reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @ValerieAnne1970

Saved - April 28, 2026 at 8:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m arguing the tetanus shot is a toxic DTaP combo, not just tetanus, with aluminum, formaldehyde, surfactants, casein, and latex residues. I say tetanus toxoid hasn’t been safety-tested in a double‑blind trial per the CDC Pink Book, and is grown on beef-heart media with a prion risk. I claim actual tetanus risk is 1 in 11 million, and sanitation/wound care halted most declines. I advocate vitamin C as a natural preventive, and urge doubt about the vaccine hype.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨"RUSTY NAIL=TETANUS SHOT" Is A Huge Medical LIE In 2026. Just cut yourself or suffered a puncture wound & the ER is about to BULLY you into a TOXIC shot you don't need? Here are the facts & research...doctors & 'health officials' don't want you to know... The shot they give you is NOT just a tetanus vaccine — it’s DTaP Diphtheria Tetanus & Pertussis loaded with: Aluminum (up to 0.625 mg/dose) Formaldehyde 2-phenoxyethanol Triton X-100 Casein (milk protein) & latex residues → anaphylaxis risk if allergic & can CAUSE dairy/latex allergy post shot. The tetanus toxoid itself has NEVER been safety-tested in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Not once. CDC admits it (Pink Book Ch. 21). Tetanus toxoid in the vaccine is grown on heated BHI Beef Heart Infusion & contamination risk exists for residual Bovine Encephalopathy Spongiform (Mad Cow Prion Disease). Your chance of getting an actual Tetanus infection is 1 in 11 million. Tetanus spores live in cow/horse/sheep manure, not random rust. Clean a bleeding wound properly → oxygen kills the spores. 95% of the historic decline happened BEFORE the vaccine thanks to sanitation & wound care. If you suspect you have been exposed to actual Tetanus the shot is useless as it takes 3-8 weeks for our immune system to create antibodies. The natural prevention/treatment is Vitamin C: High-dose Vitamin C (1–3 g/day) cured 100% of cases in published studies with ZERO deaths (Dr. Klenner 1940s + modern reports). Cheap, safe, ignored. Why are we terrorized into an untested, toxin-loaded combo shot for a disease that’s basically extinct in clean countries? Because fear sells. Don’t fall for the rusty nail myth. Wounds need cleaning & monitoring — not blind jabs. Tag someone who’s been guilt-tripped into a tetanus shot. Did you get a 'tetanus' shot & were never told it was actually the TDaP or DTaP?

Saved - April 18, 2026 at 2:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting that in 2024 the USDA approved Merck’s self-amplifying mRNA vaccines for dogs and cats (rabies, FeLV, canine flu). They claim “protection,” but I see concerns: self-spreading RNA, 14-day safety checks, no long-term or shedding data, small trials with many animals euthanized, and no independent review. I’m urging owners to say no, ask for inserts, and seek holistic vets.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

In 2024, the USDA quietly greenlit Merck’s self-amplifying mRNA “vaccines” for dogs and cats. — the same experimental tech that was forced on humans during COVID is now engineered to hijack your pet’s cells and replicate inside them. The Nobivac NXT shots have rolled out at vet clinics nationwide right now: rabies, feline leukemia (FeLV), and canine influenza (H3N2). Merck calls it “protection.” I call it a lab experiment gone wild — and a direct threat to every furry family member we love. Here’s exactly what’s happening, straight from the safety documents: 1️⃣ Nobivac NXT Rabies (for dogs AND cats) This self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) turns your pet’s own cells into rabies protein factories. It doesn’t just “train” the immune system — it hijacks cells, replicates the rabies blueprint, and spreads through organs and the brain. Trial side effects include aggression, biting, excessive drooling, seizures, vertigo, paralysis, and death — symptoms indistinguishable from actual rabies. Safety monitoring? Only 14 days. No long-term studies. Zero data on human transmission or shedding. And rabies has been virtually eradicated in the U.S. since 2007. Why are we gambling with self-spreading tech that could turn a simple kiss or scratch into the next exposure vector? 2️⃣ Nobivac NXT FeLV (feline leukemia for cats) This one replicates a leukemia virus blueprint inside your cat’s body. FeLV already affects fewer than 2% of cats naturally, yet Merck is turning healthy cats into RNA factories. Adverse events in trials hit 2.7%. No long-term cancer data. No shedding studies. No reversal method if it goes wrong. Your indoor cat doesn’t need this — but Big Pharma needs the revenue. 3️⃣ Nobivac NXT Canine Flu H3N2 (for dogs) Self-amplifying flu RNA that spreads through saliva. Most dogs never even show symptoms of canine flu naturally — yet now we’re injecting something that can shed and potentially jump species. No multi-year safety data. No independent peer review. Just Merck’s word and a quick 14-day trial. Merck’s own lab ran the tests — no independent lab, no long-term follow-up, and no peer review. In the experimental study, they used 38 dogs and cats… and 35 of them were euthanized after just two weeks. That’s not science — that’s a massive red flag. This is Merck’s new cash cow, plain and simple. No reversal switch. No long-term safety studies. No accountability if it sheds from your pet to your family, your other animals, or even wildlife. Your dog’s happy kiss or your cat’s playful scratch could now be the delivery system. What you can do RIGHT NOW: - Tell your vet NO. Ask for the full insert. Demand to know if it’s Nobivac NXT or any self-amplifying mRNA product. - Seek holistic veterinarians who respect your right to informed consent. We already know what happens when we blindly trust the system with experimental shots. Don’t let them repeat the experiment on the animals who depend on us most. Save a pet today. Say NO to the jab. Your pets deserve better. Our families deserve better. Freedom from illness starts with saying NO.

Saved - April 13, 2026 at 4:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe chlorine dioxide as the “universal antidote”—said to kill viruses, bacteria, parasites, starving cancer, cheap on Amazon, and banned in 2026. NASA allegedly called it the antidote. I note claimed real results in Uttar Pradesh with ivermectin and in Bolivia, where hospitals allegedly emptied after ClO₂ legalization. Dr. Pierre Kory says he’d use ClO₂ first for COVID and laments hidden early treatments while shots are pushed.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Chlorine Dioxide Is The Most Suppressed Medicine Of Modern Times. ~Dr. Pierre Kory, MD The $30 'Universal Antidote' that kills covid, cancer & deadly pathogens. It emptied hospitals in entire countries, healed millions~~yet still banned in 2026. • NASA called ClO₂ the “Universal Antidote” • Obliterates viruses, bacteria, parasites + starves cancer cells • ~$28 on Amazon = 2-year supply → ZERO profit for Big Pharma • PubMed? Total blackout. Not one major study allowed REAL RESULTS THEY BURIED: • Uttar Pradesh, India (241M people): Ivermectin rollout → COVID cases ~60 left • Bolivia 2020: Hospitals collapsing → legalized ClO₂ → military mass-produced → ICUs EMPTY in weeks Dr Pierre Kory: “If I get COVID tomorrow, ClO₂ first—no debate.” 72 proven early treatments hidden while they push trillion-dollar shots (cited sources attached in replies). They’re not protecting you. They’re protecting profits. RT if you’re done with the lies. Reply your ClO₂ or Ivermectin story below 👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses chlorine dioxide as a medicine that, in his view, is highly controversial and suppressed. He recalls early in his practice hearing whispers that chlorine dioxide “can cure basically everything.” He searched PubMed and found nothing published about it, despite widespread claims. It wasn’t until about a year ago, after joining a Zoom conference with colleagues and meeting a Brazilian PhD/MD he had worked with, that he realized there were people using chlorine dioxide. Since then, he has spent a year researching for his book and asserts that chlorine dioxide is “the most suppressed medicine of modern times,” globally coordinated by public health agencies and media to prevent discussion. He claims there are trails of deaths by advocates and that research on chlorine dioxide “will never get published,” though a few papers appeared in COVID-era research. He compares chlorine dioxide to ivermectin in terms of suppression, citing the Uttar Pradesh example in India where a systematic deployment program of ivermectin was carried out: 160,000 workers, 95,000 villages, testing everyone; those who tested positive received ivermectin, and all household members of positives received it as well. He notes papers in India in September 2021–2022 reporting about 241 million people with very few active cases and no new cases, yet this success “never showed up in The New York Times” and was censored in India as well; the articles did not mention the widespread ivermectin administration. He then states that, concerning chlorine dioxide, Bolivia passed a law allowing manufacturing and distribution of chlorine dioxide, with military and universities involved; people lined up to drink it, and mortality and cases “plummeted.” He acknowledges that the evidence is not yet sufficient, but suggests a pattern similar to Uttar Pradesh. The speaker adds that if he contracted COVID today, this would probably be the number-one treatment for him, even over ivermectin, based on his knowledge of efficacy. He references the website c19early.org, which aggregates real-time data on COVID therapies. According to him, the site shows 72 therapies with statistically significant benefits in COVID, based on four or more trials, with ivermectin at the top; these are therapies that can be used in combination. He describes this as “real medicine and science” that is not allowed to exist. Finally, he discusses the cost of chlorine dioxide: on Amazon, two bottles cost about $28, and while making it at home isn’t straightforward, the products are available in bulk; he mentions that you could potentially treat a family for a year or two with two bottles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The the the probably the the pinnacle example was chlorine dioxide. So early in my practice, my first year, I start hearing these whispers of this substance or this, compound can cure basically everything. And when I I so I read this book, and it was really impressive what it said this thing can do in all the places around the world that were using it. So then I go to PubMed, right, which is the medical database for papers. Can't find anything. And so there's like, I'm like, what is this? So everyone here is saying that it cures everything, but there's nothing published. And it wasn't until about a year ago when I started research on my book because I was invited to a Zoom conference with a network of colleagues, and it was about chlorine dioxide. And I met a guy that I'd done work with from Brazil, a PhD, MD, like, impressive guy, and he's in the Zoom. And I realized he's been using chlorine dioxide. So then I was like, oh, there's something here. And now I spent the last year writing this book, and what I have found is that, I'm gonna say this, Del, it is the most suppressed medicine of modern times. It has been globally coordinated by public health agencies and media around the world for decades. Thou shalt not bring up the topic of chlorine dioxide. Mhmm. There are trails of deaths by advocates, proponents. Research will never get published, although that changes a couple of papers in COVID on chlorine dioxide. And then I found I found literally the exact repeat of Uttar Pradesh. You remember the story of Uttar Pradesh in COVID, which is ivermectin. It's it's a state in Northern India where the chief minister put a systematic deployment program of ivermectin. They literally We're going. Hired a 160,000 workers Yeah. 95,000 villages. Everybody they tested tested tested. You get positive, you get ivermectin. All the health care workers took ivermectin. Anyone in the household of someone tested positive got ivermectin. And the papers literally in India were reporting in September, I think, '21 or '22 Mhmm. That there was, like, two hundred forty one million people. There was like sixty cases active and no new cases. They literally almost eradicated through this massively aggressive program on ivermectin. Never showed up in The New York Times. We never heard about it here. Right? And but there was so much of it. And even in India, it was censored. So, when they said, like, the the miraculous success of Uttar Pradesh, ivermectin didn't appear in the articles. It was just about quarantining and surveilling. They didn't mention they were giving everyone ivermectin. So guess what? I start to look into chlorine oxide, and I found the same thing. Mhmm. The entire country of Bolivia, early, they would Bolivia was doing really badly with COVID. Hammered like Peru did at one point. Some well meaning legislators got a law passed on the urging of some well meaning clinicians. They passed a law making it legal to manufacture and distribute chlorine dioxide. The military got into it. The universities were manufacturing. People were lining up in streets all through Bolivia taking their little drinks of chlorine dioxide. Mortality and cases plummeted. And I was like as I'm researching, I'm like, this is Uttar Pradesh all over again. But remember, this is not Yeah. Sufficient evidence, still. The fact that a whole country's mortality rates, and there were mayors who were using it in the ICUs, and they were saying we were emptying ICUs of COVID patients. It was, to be honest, what's interesting about this, it's quite humbling, right? I'm supposedly Mr. Ivermectin. Based on all my research, what I know now, if I got COVID right now, that would probably be number one treatment. I would take that over Ivermectin any day, knowing what I know of its efficacy. And so, and that goes to your point, right? All the things that we can do for viruses, right? So there's a website called c19early.org, probably the best science in all of COVID, anonymous group. They decided to become anonymous with the high level statisticians, systematic reviewers. They did constantly updating on all data trials on all these medicines for COVID. So you had real time, you had all these options. As of now, if you go to that website, and you look at the amount of therapies that have statistically significant benefits in COVID, based on four or more trials, it numbers 72 different ways to treat COVID. Wow. Ivermectin's actually at the top, interestingly. Yeah. But there's 72 behind it, and when you use them in combination, but this is, this is like real medicine and science, but it's not allowed to exist. Well, how much does chlorine dioxide cost? Oh, boy. On Amazon, it's literally, you get two bottles. Oh, if you make your own? Well, it comes in two I wouldn't know how to make it because you'd need the starting compounds, but on Amazon, it's $28 for two bottles. For a huge amount. You could treat your family for probably a year or two with Oh, those more? Two Yes.
Saved - April 11, 2026 at 12:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I point out that 46% of deaths happened on vaccination day, and say the CDC won’t acknowledge it since full vaccination is defined 14 days after. Video credits: JustTheNews, RealAmVoice, SenRonJohnson. I agree with @Truthtodiefor; Bethany is supported by @BBMagaMom and @DorisW.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"46% of the deaths occurred on the day of vaccination"...but the CDC will not acknowledge this because they considered a person was not fully vaccinated until 14 days after the COVID injection. https://t.co/dcyiZTk8Vy

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the message described, Speaker 0 highlights a key claim: the CDC and FDA were fully aware of the masking phenomenon within their empirical Bayesian analysis. The speaker emphasizes that this awareness was part of the information being conveyed in a letter to Bobby Kennedy. The central issue raised is not about general safety signals, but about the timing of deaths relative to vaccination. The speaker notes a concern that began earlier, stating that back in October there were discussions with Mike Eden about these injections. The concern is tied to what was observed in the data, specifically that “early on in March and April” the data appeared to be "screaming at us" when looking at thousands of deaths. The speaker provides a concrete statistic: “forty six percent of those deaths were occurring on the day of vaccination than one or two days.” The speaker then updates the figure, saying that they are “up to almost thirty nine thousand deaths” in total, and adds that “Twenty four percent of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination or within one or two days.” The speaker asserts that this information “has been available month by month by month since about March, April 2021,” yet alleges that “the federal officials are still not acknowledging it.” Instead of acknowledging these signals, the speaker claims officials point to other metrics, stating they “go to these, you know, PRR, the proportional reporting ratios, or a more sophisticated” approach. The claim continues that when PRRs were showing safety signals, officials reacted as if, “oh, we're not using those. We're using empirical Bayesian analysis. They set the trigger.” In summary, the transcript presents a narrative in which the CDC and FDA are described as being aware of a masking phenomenon identified through empirical Bayesian analysis, with specific, alarming timing data linking a significant proportion of deaths to the day of vaccination or the following couple of days. The speaker contends this information has been publicly accessible on a monthly basis since early 2021, but accuses federal officials of not acknowledging it and of favoring a different analytic framework (PRR) or of claiming to use empirical Bayesian analysis after the fact, implying that the trigger for safety signals was set within that framework. The overall emphasis is on the alleged discrepancy between available data and official acknowledgment, as well as the choice of analytic methods used to interpret safety signals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That is a, you know, headline, you know, news breaking item right there. But the most important part of what we're revealing in this letter to Bobby Kennedy is that the CDC, FDA also were fully aware of the phenomenon of masking in their, imperial empirical Bayesian analysis. Now from my standpoint, I was I was concerned back in October talking to Mike Eden about these injections. But early on in March and April because I was concerned as I was following theirs, theirs was screaming at us if we were looking at the thousands of deaths, early on forty six percent of those deaths were occurring on the day of vaccination than one or two days. We're we're up to almost thirty nine thousand deaths. Twenty four percent of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination or within one or two days. Now this has been available month by month by month since about March, April 2021, and the federal officials are still not acknowledging it. Instead, they go to these, you know, PRR, the proportional reporting ratios, or a more sophisticated when when when those when PRRs were showing safety signals as if, oh, we're not using those. We're using empirical Bayesian analysis. They set the trigger.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

video credit: @JustTheNews @RealAmVoice @SenRonJohnson

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@Truthtodiefor I completely agree!

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@BBMagaMom @DorisW It certainly is Bethany!

Saved - April 5, 2026 at 5:25 PM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Fish are being sedated & mass vaccinated with over 50 government approved 'safe & effective' vaccines. https://t.co/wDfeyIYJ6O

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccination is presented as one of the most important advancements for farming livestock in the modern age, and the greatest leap forward in fish farming welfare since its mass adoption in recent decades. The transcript notes that most livestock in The UK are vaccinated, and fish are no exception, though they present unique challenges in vaccination. A specific example is shown: Atlantic salmon smolts being vaccinated at Scotland’s Inchmore facility, described as one of the country’s most advanced freshwater facilities. The process begins with an anesthetizing bath to knock the fish out, avoiding flopping during precision treatment. Once anesthetized, juveniles are oriented upright and forward. A “fish flippers” machine is mentioned as part of the setup, reflecting a real piece of automation. Each fish is imaged, and the automated vaccinator positions every fish in line with its injector. The system administers a cocktail of vital vaccines as quickly as possible. The machine has eight injectors and can vaccinate up to 18,000 fish an hour. Throughout the process, highly trained technicians monitor the operation. The transcript notes that this process used to be done by hand, and at many farms it still is, which takes vets and techs weeks. The current system streamlines the process, with vaccinated fish returning to hatchery tanks to recover and resume a normal feeding schedule. The broad question addressed is: why are farmers vaccinating their fish? The explanation is that bacterial and viral diseases aren’t typically an issue in hatcheries, which are biosecure facilities with little environmental interaction. The real exposure occurs when fish are at sea in ocean pens, where they’re exposed to the surrounding environment and pathogens. Salmon are transferred from freshwater hatcheries to seawater pens once they reach a certain size, following a migratory pattern akin to the wild. The environment of ocean pens makes them more susceptible to pathogens, so vaccinating fish against more than a dozen common salmon diseases helps maintain a significantly higher standard of welfare by reducing the impact of infections when they occur. Vaccinations are also credited with the near elimination of antibiotic use in salmon farming. With broad adoption of vaccines and improvements in vaccines, antibiotics have disappeared relative to years past as more fish get vaccinated. The transcript frames this as one of the many protective measures undertaken here in Scottish salmon farming by vets and biologists to improve practices. And it concludes that vaccinating fish is safe for the fish and for people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's look at vaccinations, arguably one of the most important advancements for farming livestock in the modern age, and the greatest leap forward in fish farming welfare since its mass adoption in recent decades. To start, most livestock in The UK are vaccinated. Fish are no exception to this, but they do present some unique challenges in doing so. These are Atlantic salmon smolts being vaccinated at their Scottish Inchmore facility, one of the country's most advanced freshwater facilities. They start with an anesthetizing bath to knock them out. No one wants fish flopping around for this sort of precision treatment. Once they're out, these juveniles head around to be orientated upright and forward. Yes, fish flippers are a real machine. Then every fish is imaged and this massive automated vaccinator positions each fish in line with its injector. This will administer a cocktail of vital vaccines as quickly as possible. And between its eight injectors this machine can vaccinate up to 18,000 fish an hour. Throughout this highly trained technicians monitoring the entire process. By the way, this process used to be done by hand, and at many farms it still is, which takes vets and techs weeks. Now vaccinated and still a bit groggy, these fish head back to the hatchery's tanks to recover and return to a normal feeding schedule. So broadly speaking, why are farmers vaccinating their fish? Bacterial and viral diseases aren't typically an issue in the hatchery itself, it's a biosecure facility with little environmental interaction. Where fish will run into these pathogens is at sea. Salmon are transferred from these freshwater hatcheries to seawater pens once they reach a certain size, the same way they migrate in the wild. Ocean pens are obviously very exposed to the environment around them, which includes bacterial and viral pathogens. By vaccinating fish against over a dozen common salmon diseases, these farmers can maintain a significantly higher standard of welfare by reducing the impact of infections when they do inevitably occur. Vaccinations are also to thank for salmon farming's almost complete removal of necessary antibiotics. With their mass adoption, antibiotic use has all but disappeared relative to years past as more fish get vaccinated and those vaccines get better. Just one of the many protective measures undertaken here in Scottish salmon farming by vets and biologists to improve their practices. And yes, vaccinating fish is safe for them and for you.
Saved - April 2, 2026 at 12:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reported Covid vaccine injuries to VAERS, but I was fired mid‑shift for doing my duty. I was thrown out for telling the truth about suppressed data. This shows medicine serving Big Pharma over patients. Video credit: @AFLDSorg

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Deborah Conrad, Hospital PA, was fired mid-shift for doing her legal duty—reporting Covid vaccine injuries to VAERS. She was thrown out of the hospital for telling the truth about suppressed data. This is what happens when medicine serves Big Pharma instead of patients. https://t.co/63UgOLmuQ4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that they were fired for reporting COVID vaccine adverse events under the emergency use authorization to the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS). They say they were required by law to report to VAERS, and they whistleblew on their organization on The HighWire show with Dell Bigtree. They also did a piece for the New York Times. This occurred when the man gays were coming down and they asked why the speaker wasn't getting the COVID vaccine, and the speaker talked about all the side effects and the suppression of the reporting that was going on. Two weeks after, without warning, they were surrounded in the middle of their shift. They had been actively seeing patients on the floor. They were surrounded and then literally thrown out of the hospital. Patients were abandoned that day because the speaker was supposed to go back and see them for discharge, and they don’t know what happened to them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was fired for reporting COVID vaccine adverse events under the emergency use authorization to the their system, which is the vaccine adverse event reporting system. I was required to do this by law and I whistle blew on my organization on the high wire show with Dell Bigtree. I also did a little piece for the New York Times. This was when the man gays were coming down and they asked me why I wasn't getting the COVID vaccine and I talked about all the side effects and the suppression of the reporting that was going on two weeks after without warning. Was surrounded in the middle of my shift. I had been actively seeing patients on the floor. They surrounded me and then literally threw me out of the hospital. Patients were abandoned that day because I was supposed to go back and see them for discharge and they don't know what happened to me.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

video credit: @AFLDSorg

Saved - April 1, 2026 at 3:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report major funding going into transgenic edible plant vaccines. Rep Massie tried to stop it, but funding was approved. Taxpayer dollars fund mRNA vaccines grown into vegetables people eat. The NSF gave UC Riverside $500k+ to turn plants into mRNA factories; NIH & NIFA funded similar efforts from corn to alfalfa, even cholera toxin production. These plants can pollinate nearby farms, alter food chains, vaccinate without consent. Massie warns: we’re playing god with spinach. You’ll be eating it. Transgenic nanotech, government-backed biotech in your dinner. Not food—a delivery system.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨MAJOR FUNDING going into transgenic edible plant vaccines. Rep Thomas Massie tried to stop it but funding was APPROVED. Taxpayer dollars are being spent to develop mRNA vaccines grown into vegetables people eat. This isn’t sci-fi. This is happening. Right now. The National Science Foundation awarded $500,000+ to UC Riverside to turn plants into mRNA “factories.” NIH & NIFA have funded similar efforts — from corn to alfalfa, even cholera toxin production in transgenic crops. These gene-altered plants can pollinate nearby farms, alter food chains & vaccinate without consent. Massie is actively warning: “I don’t think we need to be playing god with our spinach…and yet here we are.” You won’t see it. You won’t consent to it. But you’ll be eating it. Transgenic Nanotech. Government-backed biotech in your dinner. This is not food — it’s a delivery system.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that in the agriculture appropriations bill, they tried to defund research for transgenic edible plant vaccines. They describe the concept as scary and state that taxpayer dollars are funding research on vaccines produced in lettuce and spinach, such that when people eat those leafy greens, they would be vaccinated with whatever vaccine the plant is producing. The speaker asserts that there is a belief this approach amounts to “playing God with our spinach,” and argues that if someone wants to pursue this, tighter rules are probably necessary because pollen can escape and pollute plants in neighboring farms that did not intend to grow vaccines in their food. The speaker notes that they attempted to put rules on this issue in the agriculture appropriations bill and were able to stop taxpayer spending in that bill. However, the speaker states that the bill was thrown in the trash and an omnibus was passed instead. As a result, the speaker warns that there will be “another year of transgenic edible plant vaccine research,” and indicates that this topic will be a post of its own. In summary, the speaker highlights the following points: the existence of research funded with taxpayer dollars into transgenic edible plant vaccines produced in vegetables like lettuce and spinach; the concern about potential vaccination through consumption of these plants; the risk posed by pollen dispersion to neighboring farms; an effort to restrict funding via the agriculture appropriations bill that was ultimately unsuccessful due to the bill being discarded in favor of an omnibus; and the expectation that such research will continue for another year. The overall message emphasizes opposition to funding this line of research and points to procedural outcomes that hindered the attempted defunding, while noting that the broader effort and its controversy would be revisited in a future post.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the ag appropes bill, I tried to defund research for transgenic edible plant vaccines. And it sounds kind of scary, but it is scary. We are actually funding with taxpayer dollars research on vaccines to be grown in lettuce and spinach so that when people eat their lettuce and spinach, they will get vaccinated with whatever vaccine that plant is producing. I don't think we need to be playing God with our spinach. And if somebody wants to do that, there probably needs to be tighter rules on it because pollen can escape and pollute plants in neighboring farms who never intended to be growing vaccines in their food. So I tried to put some rules on that in the ag appropes bill. And I was able to stop taxpayer dollar spending in that Aga Probes bill, but they threw that bill in the trash and did an omnibus instead. So guess what? Now you got another year of transgenic edible plant vaccine research. That's gonna be a post of its own there.
Saved - March 29, 2026 at 11:10 PM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

John Hopkins University holds the patent for Mebendazole for TREATMENT & PREVENTION OF TUMORS for years. Big Pharma suppressed this because the Global Cancer Industry makes $250 Billion in annual revenue. https://t.co/S9era83epB

Saved - March 26, 2026 at 10:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read posts claiming mRNA vaccines are entering our food chain in shrimp and pork, with Merck saying they put the right gene in livestock vaccines. One speaker suggests checking local butchers for bacon without mRNA. Others mention oral vaccine baits and bombardment via air, water, food, medicine. I hope farmers can reclaim power.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

“mRNA vaccines are entering our food chain in several species. Currently shrimp & pork are being vaccinated with mRNA.” “Merck companies state 'we put the right gene in your livestock vaccine' customized injections.” ~John Graff, chemist & agribusiness exec. https://t.co/O9Az8rGxdZ

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Video credit: @livingstreams8 & @NCICanada

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@GaLiberty You will need to go one by one to your local butcher shops & farmers to find bacon without mRNA.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@LadySaint84292 Through oral vaccine baits in their food.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@pass_kathe We are being bombarded through every angle...air, water, food, medicine,etc.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@Kelly4Info I pray the farmers can find a way to take their power back.

Saved - March 22, 2026 at 3:17 PM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Never Forget...The Funerals During Covid. Son moves closer to console his Mother at her Husband’s Funeral. Watch facility staff immediately interrupt them because of ‘Social Distancing’ rules & ‘The Science.’ Never ever forget what these people did to us. https://t.co/e4KWsfCubk

Video Transcript AI Summary
Alan Wright warmly welcomes everyone as they unite in love and friendship.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alan Wright. I therefore offer you all a very warm welcome as we unite in love and friendship. To.
Saved - March 20, 2026 at 7:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m seeing posts arguing that “Natural Flavors” may be developed from HEK-293 human embryonic cells, with Senomyx and Firmenich patents cited for using these cells in sweet/umami flavor work. They name industry partners like Coca‑Cola, Nestlé, Kraft, Campbell, etc., and claim FDA consent plus non‑disclosure to the public. Some commenters insist the sources are mainstream and factual.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"Every time you consume 'Natural Flavors', you could be eating something developed by Human Fetal Cells." ~Deborah Murtagh "The giant food companies paid Senomyx to create flavors using HEK-293 Human Embryo Kidney." The food industry is a massive machine of deception... Quotes from..."Human receptors for sweet and umami taste" Peer reviewed submitted article & Senomyx's patent: "HEK-293 Human Embryo Kidney were grown and maintained at 37°C, cells were seeded onto culture plates and stimuli were tested with 24 flavor profiles of sweet and umami taste." "Human cells were generated by transfecting cloned human and rat tissue cells. The response of human cells to all sweet taste stimuli tested was a positive, contrasted with the low limited response of rat cells." Senomyx entered into product discovery & flavor development collaborations with the world’s leading packaged food & beverage companies: Cadbury Schweppes Campbell Soup Coca-Cola Pepsi Kraft Foods Nestlé Halls Dr Pepper Trident Snapple Heinz Kool-Aid Goldfish Prego

Saved - March 19, 2026 at 10:46 PM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

WARNING! They are making VANILLA from PETROLEUM now! https://t.co/bKqdGoLLXk

Video Transcript AI Summary
For the first time in human history, vanilla is said to be derived from petroleum, with major brands allegedly relying on compounds like guaiacol to mimic real vanilla. The petroleum system is claimed to be inside popular chocolates, with Hershey's Vanilla described as starting as a refined petrochemical flavor base, then oxidized, heat treated, and chemically stripped until it collapses into a single molecule. Vanillin is then fused into the bar with cheap fats and PGPR, described as a gut disruptor, masking just 11% cacao, the legal floor to still call it milk chocolate. Oreo, Kinder, and Mars are alleged to have flagged artificial vanilla, severe processing, and heavy metals when scanned. A comment app is suggested to scan for safe brands.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the first time in human history, vanilla is now being derived from petroleum. Major brands are now relying on compounds like guaiacol to mimic the real thing. Speaker 1: And this petroleum system is already inside your favorite bars. Hershey's Vanilla starts as a refined petrochemical flavor base, oxidized, heat treated, and chemically stripped until it collapses into a single molecule. Vanillin is then fused into your bar with cheap fats and PGPR, a gut disruptor masking just 11% cacao, the legal floor to still call it milk chocolate. Oreo, Kinder, and Mars all flagged artificial vanilla, severe processing, and heavy metals when scanned. Comment app to scan safe brands.
Saved - March 18, 2026 at 5:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read a claim that a study of 1.7 million children found myocarditis and pericarditis only in those who got COVID mRNA vaccines, with no unvaccinated cases. Full study: Post 3: @super1990 Thank you Brad!

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Study involving 1.7 million children has found that Myocarditis & Pericarditis only appeared in children who had received COVID mRNA vaccines. Not a single unvaccinated child in the group suffered from these heart-related problems. https://t.co/OFIdpCSLMM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40985520/ Full study:

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@super1990 Thank you Brad!

Saved - March 14, 2026 at 2:45 PM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

This reality is permanently etched into my brain. Never forget how authorities violently removed family members from their homes for having one guest over the limit of six during Canada's COVID Christmas restrictions... https://t.co/Xsq4uhwnMq

Saved - March 8, 2026 at 2:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe cholesterol is essential in every cell and life itself; without enough, cells die. Healthy cholesterol supports brain function, hormones, muscles, bones, lungs, digestion, immunity, mood, and protection from toxins. A low-carb diet emphasizing nutrient-dense animal foods, avoiding seed oils and excess sugar, creates a favorable TG/HDL ratio—ideally under 1.5—and is claimed to yield zero CVD risk.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"The Most Dangerous Idea In Human History Is This Idea that Cholesterol Causes Heart Attacks." – Dr. Cate Shanahan, MD It Was Not True. It Was Never True. It Was Never Proven, Yet It Was Accepted As Fact. Cholesterol is in every one of our cells. It is essential to life, to animal life. All animals, not just humans, every form of animal must have cholesterol in our cell membrane. If The Cell Doesn't Have Enough, It Dies. Low Cholesterol Is Deadly & Dangerous. Healthy Cholesterol Is Crucial For A Thriving Life. Top 15 Cholesterol Benefits: • Prevents dementia & cognitive decline • Protects against all cause mortality • Production of all steroid hormones • Necessary for muscles & bone density • Protective against stroke & heart disease • Important for lungs & airways • Building block of all cells & mitochondria • Absorption of Vitamins A, D, E & K • Critical for digestion & bile acids • Immune system protection against infections • Lowers risk of cancer & death • Lowers risk of depression & suicide • Lowers stress, cortisol & anxiety • Protects against chemicals, toxins & heavy metals • Optimal brain is 60% fat & 25% cholesterol A low carbohydrate diet prioritizing nutrient dense animal foods, eliminating harmful seed oils & excess sugar, provides the best healthy cholesterol profile. This approach keeps Triglycerides low & HDL high, which is one of the best biomarkers for Cardiac health. TG/HDL ratio optimally should be less than 1.5 for zero CVD risk.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The most dangerous idea in human history is this idea that cholesterol causes heart attacks. It was not true. It was never true. It was never proven. Yet, it was accepted as fact. It's ridiculous when you think about it because cholesterol is something nature puts in every single one of our cells. It is essential to life, to animal life. All animals, not just humans, every form of animal must have cholesterol in our cell membrane. And if the cell doesn't have enough, it die. Speaker 1: Humans have survived an awful long time eating animal fats. So all of a sudden, the powers that be tell us they're literally off the table, and we followed suit thinking that these people know what they're talking about, and we were really off base.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The most dangerous idea in human history is this idea that cholesterol causes heart attacks. It was not true. It was never true. It was never proven. Yet, it was accepted as fact. It's ridiculous when you think about it because cholesterol is something nature puts in every single one of our cells. It is essential to life, to animal life. All animals, not just humans, every form of animal must have cholesterol in our cell membrane. And if the cell doesn't have enough, it die. Speaker 1: Humans have survived an awful long time eating animal fats. So all of a sudden, the powers that be tell us they're literally off the table, and we followed suit thinking that these people know what they're talking about, and we were really off base.
Saved - March 6, 2026 at 4:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Gibson says he couldn’t walk for three months after taking Remdesivir for COVID and questions Fauci. He claims Remdesivir is lethal, nicknamed “Run Death Is Near” for killing thousands in hospitals, and that it harms kidney, liver, and heart. He notes his gardener died after the same treatment and says, “We both got Remdesivir, which is not good.”

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Mel Gibson reveals he “couldn’t walk for three months” after taking Fauci’s drug for COVID. “Remdesivir kills you. I found that afterward. And that’s why I wonder about Fauci.” “Remdesivir is so lethal it got nicknamed ‘Run Death Is Near’ after it started killing thousands of COVID patients in the hospital.” “The experts claimed that remdesivir would stop COVID; instead, it stopped kidney function, then blasted the liver, the heart & other organs.” Gibson’s gardener wasn’t as fortunate. After reportedly receiving the kidney-toxic treatment, he tragically passed away. “I knew the guy for 20 years, and we both went to the same hospital, and he died, and I didn’t,” Gibson lamented. “We both got Remdesivir, which is not good.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes contracting COVID from his gardener, noting that the gardener had it first and died, while he survived. He says, “I got COVID from my gardener, and he had it first, and then I got it. I was like, ah, did I grab the hose or what, you know, what was I don't know. But it was it was I knew the guy for twenty years, and we both went to the same hospital. And he died, and I didn't. Jesus.” He claims they both received remdesivir, saying, “I think we both got remdesivir, which is not good. Not good. Not good. Causes kidney failure. I know.” He adds that he couldn’t walk for three months after receiving that treatment and that, “I couldn't walk for three months after I had that stuff. Really? Because it kills you.” He says he learned afterward that remdesivir “kills you,” and he ties this to a question about Fauci: “and that's why I wonder about Fauci, you know.” Speaker 1 responds, suggesting that the audience should indeed “wonder about that guy,” and contrasts this with actions he describes as preventing people from obtaining monoclonal antibodies: “Oh, you should wonder about that guy. When meanwhile, they were trying to stop people from getting monoclonal antibodies.” He criticizes the restriction of monoclonal antibodies as “fucking insane” because it followed a push to promote vaccines for profit, stating, “They've restricted monoclonal antibodies, which is fucking insane because they wanted to promote that vaccine because they wanted a profit off of it, which brings us back again to evil.” He asserts, “Evil's real. It's real. Putting money over human lives is evil. I agree.” He adds that there is a temptation to pursue such income, calling it “a real thing,” and reaffirms, “and there's a there's a temptation to do it too, which is even more crazy. Yeah.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I got COVID from my gardener, and he had it first, and then I got it. I was like, ah, did I grab the hose or what, you know, what was I don't know. But it was it was I knew the guy for twenty years, and we both went to the same hospital. And he died, and I didn't. Jesus. I think we both got remdesivir, which is not good. Not good. Not good. Causes kidney failure. I know. I I couldn't walk for three months after I had that stuff. Really? Because it kills you. I found out afterwards it kills you, and that's why I wonder about Fauci, you know. Speaker 1: Oh, you should wonder about that guy. When meanwhile, they were trying to stop people from getting monoclonal antibodies. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. They've restricted monoclonal antibodies, which is fucking insane because they wanted to promote that vaccine because they wanted a profit off of it, which brings us back again to evil. Mhmm. Evil's real. It's real. Putting money over human lives is evil. I agree. It's a it's a real thing, and there's a there's a temptation to do it too, which is even more crazy. Yeah.
Saved - March 5, 2026 at 5:11 PM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

One of Professor Francis Boyle's last interviews before being found dead. He called the COVID shots 'franken-shot' Bioweapons. He called out Bill Gates as a depopulation Eugenicist. https://t.co/4yE16X9jCi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Gates is funding all this; he is a well known eugenicist and has publicly stated the human population has to be reduced. So if you put together the COVID-nineteen pandemic and the Franken shots, the estimate I've seen now is maybe twenty million are already dead. So as I think Gates and some of these other people see it, that's a good start. The World Economic Forum, those types of people, yes. Twenty million dead is a good start as they see it and put it back. Plus if you look at the demographics who died, it's primarily senior citizens. And that then is economically beneficial. It wipes out social security, pensions, Medicare at least in this country and things of that nature. So you no longer have to pay for these COVID-nineteen, have figures here but it is far more lethal the older you get. And it's literally wiping out senior citizen populations. Yes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sure, Bill Gates is funding all this. And he is a well known eugenicist and has publicly stated the human population has to be reduced. And so if you put together the COVID-nineteen pandemic and the Franken shots, the estimate I've seen now is maybe twenty million are already dead. So as I think Gates and some of these other people see it, that's a good start. The World Economic Forum, those types of people, yes. Twenty million dead is a good start as they see it and put it back. Plus if you look at the demographics who died, it's primarily senior citizens. And that then is economically beneficial. It wipes out social security, pensions, Medicare at least in this country and things of that nature. So you no longer have to pay for these COVID-nineteen, have figures here but it is far more lethal the older you get. And it's literally wiping out senior citizen populations. Yes.
Saved - March 5, 2026 at 4:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was fired after 31 years as an ER physician with no complaints, says Dr. Charles Hoffe. He claims COVID shots cause more side effects than any treatment in history and that the toxic spike protein reaches every part of the body.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"I was fired...after 31 years as an ER Physician & not one single complaint against me." ~Dr Charles Hoffe "These COVID shots have caused greater side effects than any other medical treatment in history. The toxic spike protein ends up in literally every part of your body." https://t.co/YKK5lFVZ6a

Saved - March 3, 2026 at 5:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that Zen Honeycutt found 100% of Girl Scout cookies contain glyphosate and 88% contain heavy metals (Arsenic, Lead, Mercury). Thin Mints: glyphosate 334x harmful; Peanut Butter Patties: highest metals, Lead and aluminum; 76% exceed Cadmium limits; 96% contain Lead. It’s framed as slow poisoning wrapped in nostalgia, with GSUSA profits of about $800M and a silent response.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Danger in the dough..."Girl Scout Cookies are 100% positive for Glyphosate at alarming levels. 100% positive for Heavy Metals including Aluminum, Arsenic, Cadmium, Mercury & Lead." ~Zen Honeycutt Here is what they found inside the legendary cookies: ~100% of Girl Scout cookies contain glyphosate. ~88% contain heavy metals: Arsenic, Lead & Mercury. ~Thin Mints glyphosate levels 334X what experts consider harmful. ~Peanut Butter Patties had the highest level of heavy metals with Lead & alarming levels of aluminum. ~76% of cookies exceeded Cadmium safety limits. ~96% contained Lead This is more than just "unhealthy." It is slow poisoning, wrapped in nostalgia & sold by children. The organization, Girl Scouts USA, generates nearly $800M in yearly profits from this. When presented with these test results, their response was silence.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that Girl Scout cookies are a problem. They tested 13 different types of cookies from 25 states, including California, Iowa, and one other state, and the results were published on momsacrossamerica.org. The tests reported 100% positive for glyphosate and 100% positive for heavy metals, at alarming levels. Over 88% of the cookies contained all five of the toxic metals tested: aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead. The speaker notes that some of these toxic metals can leave permanent lifetime damage. They claim that over 80% of the Girl Scout cookies had lead levels higher than what the EPA allows. They also state that the aluminum was up to 300 times higher than the exposure level people are supposed to be exposed to, with aluminum readings described as possibly being in the parts per million range (around 29 parts per million). The speaker suggests a possible source for the high aluminum levels, speculating that it could be related to geoengineering, since aluminum is sprayed to manipulate clouds to create rain, though they say further testing needs to be done on that hypothesis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Girl Scout cookies, it's a problem, Del. We tested 13 different types of cookies from 25 states. Those were, I believe it was California, Iowa, and one other states on our website, momsacrossamerica.org. They were 100% positive for glyphosate dell at alarming levels and 100% positive for heavy metals. Over 88% of them had all five of the toxic metals that we tested for, which is aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, lead. And these, some of these toxic metals, I mean pretty, almost all of them, can leave permanent lifetime damage. Since over 80% of the Girl Scout cookies had levels of lead that were higher than what the EPA allows. And the aluminum was anywhere up to 300 times higher than what, is supposed to be people are supposed to be exposed to. We do suspect that the aluminum, because it was such high levels, it was parts per million, like twenty twenty nine thousand parts per billion or so 29 parts per million. We're suspecting geoengineering because aluminum is sprayed through trying to manipulate the clouds to create rain. So we're not sure, but further testing needs to be done on that.
Saved - March 2, 2026 at 4:09 AM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

~Dr. David E. Martin, PhD..."You cannot PATENT something that is Naturally Occurring, therefore the only legal Patented Virus is MANUFACTURED." "If it is MANUFACTURED then that becomes a violation of BIOLOGICAL & CHEMICAL WEAPONS TREATIES." https://t.co/UvBAPVwj6D

Saved - March 1, 2026 at 1:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The article presents a dire and unified claim: bees are undergoing a genocide-like collapse that threatens global food security and human health. It argues that more than 50% of the world’s bee population died last year, and that bees are responsible for pollinating one third of the foods on human plates. The piece asserts this is not an accident or climate mishap but a deliberate, systemic destruction driven by contemporary farming practices and corporate interests. It contends that bees are vanishing in Europe, North America, and Asia alike, with a silent mainstream media and government that fail to warn the public or take effective action. Central causes are laid out in a multi-pronged critique. The article claims chemicals sprayed on fields destroy the nervous systems of pollinators, while wildflower meadows are paved over in favor of monoculture crops that offer little nutrition to bees. It charges modern farming with GMOs and a soil treatment regime that reduces the land’s living, medicinal capacity, treating soil as mere dirt. The piece frames these developments as part of a broader pattern designed to shift society toward dependence on processed foods and, eventually, medical interventions marketed as cures. In this framing, a world without healthy food becomes easier to control, as fresh produce grows scarce and expensive and people turn to processed products and pharmaceuticals. The article emphasizes that the crisis is not only ecological but existential for personal health and freedom. It asserts that real food is foundational to health, describing “Food Is Medicine” as more than a slogan. It suggests that the loss of bees threatens not only honey but the nourishment that underpins lasting health and resistance to sickness shaped by the current system. The author connects personal experience to the wider argument, recounting healing from illness by changing diet and praising nature’s remedies as guidance amid a perceived crisis. To counter the crisis, the article offers concrete, actionable steps. It advocates planting bee-friendly flowers such as lavender, borage, clover, and sunflowers; stopping toxic weed-and-feed products; supporting small organic farmers who avoid spraying crops; and engaging in backyard beekeeping. It invites readers to participate in protections for bees as a route to preserving the broader food system and personal health, arguing that the Bee Genocide can stop when enough people refuse to remain silent and actively protect nature. The conclusion emphasizes urgency: protecting bees is synonymous with protecting the food that heals and the freedom to choose nature over a system that profits from sickness.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

x.com/i/article/2027…

The Bee Genocide: Nature’s Warning We Can’t Ignore Anymore

The Bee Genocide: Nature’s Warning We Can’t Ignore Anymore “Did you know over 50% of the Bees in the World died last year?” “Bees are responsible for one third of our Food Sources.” “It’s not an accident...it’s a Bee Genocide.” This subject receives nowhere near enough attention & by the time it does, it may well be too late. Friends, I’m not here to scare you for the sake of it. I’m here because I’ve risen from the ashes myself. I know what it feels like when your body is breaking down and the so-called “experts” keep pushing pills and shots instead of real solutions. Nature Always Provides Cures. Food Is Medicine. Change Your Food, Heal Your Life. That’s not a slogan for me — it’s how I got my freedom from illness. And right now Nature is screaming at us through the bees. Think about it. Every almond you eat, every apple, every blueberry, every cucumber, every single bite of real food that actually nourishes your body instead of inflaming it... depends on these tiny creatures. One third of everything on your plate. Without them we don’t just lose honey. We lose the foundation of real health. We lose the very food that keeps us free from the chronic sickness the system profits from. This isn’t “climate change” or “bad luck.” This is deliberate. A Bee Genocide. They’ve sprayed our fields with chemicals that don’t just kill weeds — they destroy the nervous systems of pollinators. They’ve paved over wildflower meadows and replaced them with monoculture crops that offer zero nutrition to bees. They’ve pushed GMOs and “modern farming” that treats the soil like dirt instead of the living medicine it is. And while we’re all distracted arguing about politics, the bees are vanishing at a rate that should have every single one of us marching in the streets. Last year alone the numbers were catastrophic. Over half the global population gone. Not in some far-off country — everywhere. Europe, North America, Asia... it doesn’t matter. The pattern is the same. And the silence from mainstream media and government is deafening. Why? Because a world without healthy food is a world easy to control. When fresh produce becomes scarce and expensive, people turn to the processed junk loaded with seed oils, sugars, and additives that make you sick. Then they sell you the “cures” — more shots, more pills, more dependency. Freedom from illness disappears when the very foundation of that freedom (real food) is taken away. But here’s what they don’t want you to know: Nature is already showing us the way out. Plant bee-friendly flowers in your yard or even in pots on your balcony — lavender, borage, clover, sunflowers. Stop using those toxic “weed and feed” products that kill everything good. Support small organic farmers who don’t spray their crops into oblivion. Learn about backyard beekeeping — yes, you really can do it. Thousands are already stepping up and becoming the solution instead of waiting for permission. I changed my food and healed my life. Now it’s time we protect the creatures that make that possible. This isn’t just about bees. This is about whether we still have the courage to choose Nature over the system that profits from our sickness. This is about whether we will wake up before the grocery shelves tell the story for us. Share this far and wide. Talk about it at dinner. Teach your children. Because if we lose the bees, we don’t just lose honey — we lose one of the last pure connections we have to the food that truly heals us. The Bee Genocide stops when enough of us refuse to stay silent. Nature always provides... but only if we protect her first. Food Is Medicine. Freedom From Illness starts in the garden and the hive. Who’s with me?

Saved - March 1, 2026 at 10:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that over 50% of the bees died last year; bees are responsible for a third of our food; it’s not an accident—it’s a bee genocide. This topic gets little attention, and by the time it does, it may be too late.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

“Did you know over 50% of the Bees in the World died last year?” “Bees are responsible for one third of our Food Sources.” “It’s not an accident...it’s a Bee Genocide.” This subject receives nowhere near enough attention & by the time it does, it may well be too late. https://t.co/ABQQMnMqLq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 centers the discussion on the veneration of the honeybee and makes a stark, unsettling assertion: bees are being murdered. The speaker claims that over half of the world’s bees died last year, presenting this as a staggering loss with wide-reaching consequences. They quantify the impact by noting that the United States alone lost $600,000,000 because bees pollinate and are responsible for one third of our food sources. This framing emphasizes the bees’ crucial role in food production and the economic stakes attached to their decline. In addressing the question of what is killing the bees, the speaker rejects the idea that climate change is the primary culprit, suggesting that this notion is being pushed upon the public. Instead, they assert that pesticides are a major contributing factor. Beyond pesticides, the speaker states a more alarmist and conspiratorial view by asserting beliefs that five g and chemtrails are killing the bees, and they insist that this is not an accident. They describe the situation as genocide, framing it as a deliberate or systematic attack rather than a random environmental phenomenon. The speaker further characterizes the situation with apocalyptic language, calling it the “bee apocalypse” and attributing the responsibility to the elite. This framing links the alleged deaths of bees to a broader, conspiratorial elite-driven agenda, suggesting intentional harm or neglect at the highest levels of power and influence. A dramatic consequence is emphasized: when the bees die, humans have four years left. This urgent timeline is presented as a direct result of the bees’ disappearance, underscoring the belief that pollination by bees is indispensable to human survival and global food systems. The speaker also cautions against adopting artificial intelligence as a substitute for bees, arguing that we are at the verge of losing our heritage to the most important creature that’s ever existed on this planet. Throughout, the emphasis remains on the essential, irreplaceable role of bees in the ecosystem and food production, paired with a sense of imminent doom if action or understanding does not align with the speaker’s asserted explanations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A very favorite subject, the veneration of the honeybee. What if I were to tell you that the bees are being murdered? Over half the bees in the world died last year. Do you know what cost The US $600,000,000 alone because the bees pollinate and thus are responsible for one third of our food sources? So what's killing the bees? Don't let anyone tell you it's climate change. They're trying to run that one past us. Yes. It's the pesticides, but I believe five g and chemtrails are killing the bees, and it's not an accident. This is genocide. This is the bee apocalypse, and I believe it is the work of the elite. When the bees die, humans have four years left. Don't accept AI as a substitute for bees because we are at the verge of losing our heritage to the most important creature that's ever existed on this planet.
Saved - March 1, 2026 at 12:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read Fox News claiming ice cream is made from plastic, saying this version uses materials from plastic bottles. It also mentions carrageenan and synthetic vanilla: carrageenan allegedly degrades to poligeenan that injures guts in lab gut-permeability tests, and synthetic vanilla is produced by breaking down PET into terephthalic acid then into vanillin.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Fox News reports Ice Cream being made out of plastic. “World's first ice cream made with plastic. You heard it right. This version of the sweet treat is actually made from the same materials found in plastic bottles.” Other harmful ingredients include Carrageenan & Synthetic Vanilla... Carrageenan degrades in the gut into Poligeenan which cause gut permeability 'leaky gut'. Researchers literally use it to intentionally injure guts & lab experiments. Synthetic vanilla is genetically engineered. Bacteria & enzymes are used to break down PET plastic used in water & soda bottles into terephthalic acid, then convert that into synthetic vanillin.

Saved - February 26, 2026 at 11:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim Dr. Eric Nepute was sued by the US Gov't for over $500 billion for promoting prevention with Vitamin D, Quercetin and Zinc. He treated over 11,000 Covid patients with zero deaths, yet the Biden admin went after him to push hospitalization, Remdesivir, and ventilators. The supposed medical scams of the pandemic have surfaced, but Nepute remains deplatformed, demonetized, and broke, while Fauci, Gates, and others grew billions with no persecution.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Dr Eric Nepute was sued by the US Gov't for over $500 BILLION, for helping patients & talking about prevention with Vitamin D, Quercetin & Zinc. Dr Nepute treated over 11,000 patients during Covid - not one died - yet the Biden Administration went after him because they didn’t want prevention or early treatment. They wanted people funneled into hospitals, given Remdesivir & put on ventilators. The truth about the medical scams during the pandemic have come out...yet, Dr Nepute is still deplatformed, demonetized, banned, lost millions in legal fees & had to start his life over...all while Fauci, Gates & others increased their wealth by billions with no persecution.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

video credit: @NeputeWellness

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@Lkona15 That is so wonderful to hear Lkona!

Saved - February 19, 2026 at 11:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that Japan delayed DTaP until age two in 1981, correlating with low infant mortality compared with the US. After two DTwP deaths in the 1970s, DTwP was halted, DTaP started for 2+, and in 1993 Japan stopped the MMR after severe reactions, keeping measles and rubella separate and never reintroducing mumps or MMR. The 1994 Immunization Act made vaccines voluntary. As of 2022, US infant mortality was 5.6/1000 vs Japan’s 1.7/1000.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"SIDS ‘DISAPPEARED’ In Japan After Raising The Age of Vaccination To 2yrs Old." — Dr. Pierre Kory, MD In 1981, Japan delayed the DTaP vaccine until children turned two years old. Japan holds one of the lowest infant mortality rates, while the US ranks among the highest. During the 1970s, following only two reported infant deaths linked to the whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTwP), intense public concern prompted the Japanese government to halt routine DTwP vaccinations. They later introduced the acellular pertussis version (DTaP) in 1981, but limited its use to children aged two and older. In 1993, Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labor & Welfare discontinued the combined MMR vaccine after it triggered a significant increase in severe adverse reactions — particularly aseptic meningitis resulting in serious harm and fatalities. Japan now provides separate measles and rubella vaccines and has never reintroduced the mumps component or the MMR combination shot. In 1994, Japan revised its Immunization Act, changing all childhood vaccinations from mandatory to voluntary/recommended status. This removed any penalties for declining vaccines and moved administration from mass public health clinics to individual choice via private doctors — prioritizing personal decision-making and informed consent. The U.S. continues to have the highest infant mortality rate among 16 other developed nations. As of 2022, the CDC reports the U.S. rate at 5.6 deaths per 1,000 live births. Japan’s rate remains among the world’s lowest at 1.7 per 1,000 — the U.S. rate is more than three times higher.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This actually happened in Japan. The speaker notes that Japan has taken actions on vaccine safety that many Western advanced health economies have not followed. After a rash of deaths in the seventies, Japan raised the age of vaccination to two years old. Guess what happened? When they did that, infant deaths disappeared. So, a country that noticed the signal and did something about it actually solved the problem. Neonatal mortality decreased.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This actually happened in Japan. I think this is really interesting because you look you look at how these two countries behave towards vaccines and vaccine safety. And Japan has done really some actions which are not followed by a lot of the other Western advanced health economies. But when they noticed this rash of deaths in the seventies, they saw what they did is they raised the age of vaccination to two years old. Guess what happened? When they did that, infant deaths disappeared. You know, so you have a country who noticed the signal, did something about it, actually solved the problem. Neonatal mortality decreased.
Saved - February 19, 2026 at 5:49 PM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Snow tested in Denton, TX...This is what was found in a sample of snow tested at NextLevel Labs. The results show multiple heavy metals at dangerously high levels: ~Aluminum ~Barium ~Strontium ~Mercury ~Lead ~Sulfur ~Nitrates https://t.co/GfonXUXz32

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a snowstorm in Texas during which a sample was taken to a lab. She references reports of people attempting to burn the snow, which would not burn. In the lab results, aluminum, barium, stonium, mercury, lead, sulfur, and nitrates were found at dangerously high levels. She states these are toxic chemical compounds known to harm the brain, the nervous system, and the environment. She adds, “You're not crazy for asking questions. You're crazy if you stay silent.” She mentions helping with brain fog symptoms all week in Texas. She asks whether the snow could be fake snow sent upon them and ends with the claim that everywhere we look is evil.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was in this snowstorm in Texas that just came. She took it to a lab. I've seen reports of people trying to burn the snow, and it wouldn't burn. She's they they found in this test aluminum, barium, stonium, mercury, lead, sulfur, nitrates, all at dangerously high levels. These are toxic chemical compounds known to harm the brain, the nervous system, and environment. You're not crazy for asking questions. You're crazy if you stay silent. You know, some of that they say will make you have like a brain fog. That's I'm here in Texas. I've helped that those symptoms of a brain fog all week. Could it be that fake snow that they sent upon us? Everywhere we look is evil.
Saved - February 14, 2026 at 1:43 PM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"5G isn't for faster internet—it's a microwave weapon developed by the military to disrupt your health & sleep." ~Michael Gibson https://t.co/VBJd1NrH0F

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: You've heard me talk about the five g towers and how it's not for Internet at all. It's a microwave weapon developed by the military to be used on the citizens. Take a look at this video. Speaker 1: They started at 09:11 at night until 09:11 in the morning. You see the pulse going from the East to the West Coast. Alright. Boom. You see that? Those are NEXRAD stations. Each of those towers are 750 kilowatts, pumping out between 2.7 to 2.9 gigahertz in the microwave range. This is roughly the same frequency as your microwave oven. Speaker 0: Now there are tons and tons of whistleblowers coming out about this technology and how dangerous and damaging and deadly it is. This is not for Internet. You wanna know if it's true? Go right up to one of those damn towers and see how good your service is. It's still gonna suck. These things are not for Internet service or communications. It's a weapon. They are frying you with microwaves while you sleep. If you saw in the video, did you notice where it wasn't? Where they weren't microwaving the population while they slept? All the areas of the country that are the least populated. Is that by accident? Those microwaves just magically don't go to those certain areas of the country? No. There's no reason to do it there. There's very few people that live there compared to the populated areas of the country that have huge cities in them. That's where you notice they are microwaving you to death. Are you feeling sick? Are you feeling lethargic? You can't think straight. You're not sleeping well. You're having crazy dreams. All of this stuff is radiation poisoning. Look up the symptoms of radiation poisoning. You're gonna see they identically match a lot of your symptoms that you're having. Funny enough, it also matches a lot of the symptoms of COVID. Crazy how that works. So I'm telling you guys, you have got to understand what's happening. And they're talking about putting up four times the amount of towers in the next four years. Why would they need that? We can prove that it's not for Internet. It's not for cell phone service. So why? You need to start asking yourself, why are they putting these things up at an unprecedented rate and then lying to your face about what they're for? Reach out. Let's connect. Let's figure out the plan of how we stop this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You've heard me talk about the five g towers and how it's not for Internet at all. It's a microwave weapon developed by the military to be used on the citizens. Take a look at this video. Speaker 1: They started at 09:11 at night until 09:11 in the morning. You see the pulse going from the East to the West Coast. Alright. Boom. You see that? Those are NEXRAD stations. Each of those towers are 750 kilowatts, pumping out between 2.7 to 2.9 gigahertz in the microwave range. This is roughly the same frequency as your microwave oven. Speaker 0: Now there are tons and tons of whistleblowers coming out about this technology and how dangerous and damaging and deadly it is. This is not for Internet. You wanna know if it's true? Go right up to one of those damn towers and see how good your service is. It's still gonna suck. These things are not for Internet service or communications. It's a weapon. They are frying you with microwaves while you sleep. If you saw in the video, did you notice where it wasn't? Where they weren't microwaving the population while they slept? All the areas of the country that are the least populated. Is that by accident? Those microwaves just magically don't go to those certain areas of the country? No. There's no reason to do it there. There's very few people that live there compared to the populated areas of the country that have huge cities in them. That's where you notice they are microwaving you to death. Are you feeling sick? Are you feeling lethargic? You can't think straight. You're not sleeping well. You're having crazy dreams. All of this stuff is radiation poisoning. Look up the symptoms of radiation poisoning. You're gonna see they identically match a lot of your symptoms that you're having. Funny enough, it also matches a lot of the symptoms of COVID. Crazy how that works. So I'm telling you guys, you have got to understand what's happening. And they're talking about putting up four times the amount of towers in the next four years. Why would they need that? We can prove that it's not for Internet. It's not for cell phone service. So why? You need to start asking yourself, why are they putting these things up at an unprecedented rate and then lying to your face about what they're for? Reach out. Let's connect. Let's figure out the plan of how we stop this.
Saved - February 11, 2026 at 9:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read a viral claim that Windows updates turn on OneDrive and relocate my files to Microsoft’s servers, making my PC a local mirror while the cloud holds the real copies. Family photos, docs, and memories can vanish; the desktop may go blank with only a “Where are my files?” prompt. Turning off OneDrive or deleting files can wipe the cloud. Recovery uses obscure settings; Microsoft rarely, plainly warns.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Bill Gates' Microsoft Can Delete Everything on Your Computer — Most People Have No Clue Until It’s Too Late! Jason Pargin's viral video is exposing a shocking hidden behavior in Windows that’s blindsiding millions of users. “I think they should have to go to jail for this.” Windows updates turn on OneDrive — with no honest, clear warning. Your files aren’t simply being “backed up.” They’re being **relocated** to Microsoft’s cloud servers. Your PC becomes little more than a local mirror. Microsoft’s servers now hold the real, authoritative version. Then the nightmare begins: - Family photos vanish - Critical documents disappear - Years of personal memories and work files — gone - Desktop suddenly blank - Only a tiny icon or message asking “Where are my files?” Many people initially believe they’ve been ransomware’d. They haven’t. Turning off OneDrive can wipe the local copies. Deleting files “to save space” also removes them from the cloud. Recovery usually requires digging through obscure settings or following random online guides. Nowhere does Microsoft clearly say in plain language: “We are moving all your files from your computer to our servers — and we now control them.” Millions click “Update” every day with zero idea this is happening behind the scenes. When a corporation can quietly take control of your personal files & erase them with one misclick — how is this not malware?

Video Transcript AI Summary
- The speaker claims Windows includes a piece of malware called OneDrive that will spontaneously delete all files off your computer, not from OneDrive but from your local machine. They say, “OneDrive will spontaneously delete all of the files off of your computer,” and that “all of my photos and videos of my family, all of my work files, everything is gone.” - They assert there is no warning, no confirmation button, and no pop-up before this happens. It “will start doing it” during a Windows update that begins using OneDrive, with “no plain language warning to opt out.” - OneDrive allegedly quietly uploads everything on the computer to Microsoft servers, and users may notice only when OneDrive warns that it’s running out of space. The user then looks up how to stop it and “you will get onto your computer the next day to find everything is gone.” - After deletion, the desktop shows a single icon that says, “where are my files?” They say many people thought they had been hit by ransomware or a virus. - When the user tries to recover, they are forced to download all the files back to the machine, which can take a long time on slow or metered Internet connections. - If the user then deletes the files from the local computer and also from OneDrive, the files are deleted from the computer again with “no warning, with no pop up, without anything.” - The only way to delete the files off the machine without also deleting them from OneDrive is to follow a YouTube tutorial with detailed steps, because there is no intuitive way in the menus. They emphasize there is no plain English explanation like, “Hey, do you want us to take everything on your computer and put it on our computer instead?” - The speaker argues that many people assume cloud storage is a backup, but OneDrive “secretly transfers your machine to their machine so that their machine is the primary. Those files are the copy of the files.” When you work on the local machine, it is treated as temporary access to those files. This slows the machine because it writes and reads data to the cloud rather than the hard drive. - Practically, if anything happens to the file on OneDrive’s machine, it’s deleted everywhere because it’s now only on their machine, and you are only allowed to temporarily access it. The speaker notes this is “very intuitive” to accidentally delete everything, and questions how this was allowed to go out the door. - The concluding point: when OneDrive says it’s full and you delete things to free up space, it deletes them from your machine too, which the speaker finds unbelievable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think they should have to go to jail for this. I'm only barely joking here. If you're unaware, for the last few years, Windows has come with a piece of malware called OneDrive, and OneDrive, if you're not careful, will spontaneously delete all of the files off of your computer. Not on their computer on OneDrive, I mean off of your machine, the one that's in your house. If you have been fortunate enough to not have your life ruined by OneDrive, just Google that word and you will find a torrent of people saying, It took everything. All of my photos and videos of my family, all of my work files, everything is gone. OneDrive will not give you any warning whatsoever that it is about to do this. It will not give you a confirmation button to hit. It will not give you a pop up or anything. Here's how it happens. At some point, your Windows computer will update to start using OneDrive. At no point in the process will you be given any kind of a plain language warning to opt out of it. It will just start doing it. Then at some point, will notice that it is quietly uploading everything on your computer to Microsoft servers. Some of you will only notice this because you're on a slow or metered Internet connection and it's trying to upload 40 gigabytes of video and work files and private records. Or you may have only found out when OneDrive gave you a warning that it was running out of space. So you will look up how do I make it stop doing that, and you will find the option to turn off OneDrive backup. Then you will get onto your computer the next day to find everything is gone. Everything on your computer was deleted by Microsoft. And on your desktop, completely clean of icons, will be one cheeky little icon that says, where are my files? Many, many people who saw this assumed they had been hit by a ransomware attack or a virus where some hacker has stolen all of their data and is now holding it hostage. So you click on that icon that says, don't worry, all of your life's work is now on our machine. We helpfully deleted it from your machine without ever asking you. But we're still not at the worst part because at this point, you'll be forced to download all of your stuff back to your machine. Again, God help you if you're on a slow or metered Internet connection because you now have to grab the many gigabytes of work and slowly bring it back. At which point you will say, okay, Microsoft, I don't want you to have my files. I want to delete them off of OneDrive. So on your local computer, you will have all of the files on your local machine now, and then it will show where those files also on OneDrive. So you will go into OneDrive and you will delete them. Only to find that when you delete them off of Microsoft servers, they go in and delete them off your computer again with no warning, with no pop up, without anything. The only way to delete the files off their machine without also deleting them off of your machine is to go find a YouTube tutorial walking through the detailed steps on how to do it. To be absolutely clear, to make OneDrive not do this requires looking it up. There is no intuitive way to do it. They intentionally buried those options in the menus, and none of those options say in plain English what they do. At no point in any of this does it come out and say in plain English, Hey, do you want us to take everything on your computer and put it on our computer instead? If it did say that, everyone would say no. They realize this. The issue is that by now, everybody is familiar with the concept of storing files on the cloud. Lots of machines offer the cloud as a backup if you want. You would assume that that's what OneDrive is. It's a chance to back up your files in case something happens to your local machine, but that is not what it is. OneDrive secretly transfers your machine to their machine so that their machine is the primary. Those files are the copy of the files. When you work on your local machine, they treat it as you temporarily accessing those files. This, of course, massively slows down your machine because instead of writing and reading data to your hard drive, you're having to upload and download it to the cloud. What this means in practice is if anything happens to the file on their machine, it's deleted everywhere because you no longer have it. It's only on their machine. You're just allowed to temporarily access it. And at no point anywhere do they explain in plain language that this is what they're doing. It is so unintuitive that it is very easy to accidentally delete everything you have everywhere. Do you understand when OneDrive says that it's full and you go in to delete some things to free up space, it deletes it from your machine too? I genuinely cannot believe that this was allowed to go out the door like this or that nobody else stepped in to stop them.
Saved - February 11, 2026 at 4:25 AM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

The 6-year Anniversary of the most egregious Crimes Against Humanity is almost here... “We have people walking around without an immune system…no ability to make an immune system…they were injected with 81 strands of foreign bacteria…and 8 strands of foreign HIV…” https://t.co/6eJvbsRNl1

Saved - February 9, 2026 at 2:01 AM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"Glyphosate was NEVER meant to come in contact with our food. It was patented to strip the minerals off the walls of pipes." ~Jeffrey Smith "It makes plants mineral deficient, it makes animals mineral deficient & it makes us mineral deficient." https://t.co/9p1FS7mUJ2

Saved - February 8, 2026 at 9:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Coffee is a superfood & longevity drink. Chlorogenic acid boosts circulation, supports stem cell function, aids gut health, slows aging by protecting telomeres, and fights fat by activating brown fat. 1-2 cups daily (caffeinated or decaf) benefits health & metabolism. It’s not acidic to blood pH; organic, mold-free coffee has more chlorogenic acid. Takeaway: the right coffee can enhance circulation, slow aging, protect cells, and burn fat.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"Coffee is a superfood & longevity drink. Chlorogenic Acid—delivers serious health benefits." ~Dr William Li, MD Here's 5 ways in which Coffee is good for you... 🔥 1. Boosts Circulation ▪️ Chlorogenic acid improves blood flow, leading to better oxygenation of your brain, muscles & organs. ▪️ This isn’t just a quick boost—it enhances circulation long-term with regular coffee consumption. 🧬 2. Protects & Regenerates Stem Cells ▪️ Stem cells help your body repair & regenerate tissues. ▪️ Coffee supports stem cell function, which means faster recovery & better cellular health. 🦠 3. Supports Gut Health ▪️ The gut microbiome influences immunity, metabolism & brain function. ▪️ Chlorogenic acid helps balance gut bacteria, promoting better digestion & a stronger immune system. ⏳ 4. Slows Down Aging ▪️ It protects telomeres (the caps on DNA that shorten with age). ▪️ Slower telomere degradation = longer cellular lifespan = anti-aging effects. 💪 5. Fights Excess Body Fat ▪️ It prevents new fat cells from being made. ▪️ Chlorogenic acid activates brown fat, a special kind of fat that helps burn off harmful white or visceral fat. 1-2 cups of daily Coffee - both caffeinated & decaffeinated - is great for your health, longevity & metabolism! Dr William Li sets the record straight: "Coffee does not make your blood more acidic, as some people claim. As a physician & scientist who is taking care of people in the ICU, your body is a perfect balancer of PH in your blood at all times. Your blood is tightly controlled in a very narrow range. You cannot acidify your blood with coffee. If you actually had acidic blood you would be in the ICU with sepsis." You can benefit even more by choosing mold free organic coffee. Organic coffee has 3X times the amount of Chlorogenic Acid than conventional coffee. 💡 The Takeaway For That Daily Cup Of Coffee ▪️ Coffee isn’t just caffeine—it’s a longevity drink. ▪️ The right coffee (organic, mold-free, without sugar & junk additives) can enhance circulation, slow aging, protect your body at a cellular level, encourage a healthy gut microbiome & burn body fat.

Saved - February 8, 2026 at 4:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I share a clip alleging governments engineer plagues to target populations. It links HIV’s rise to Fauci’s NIAID years and says COVID injections rewrite DNA. It claims Zappa’s father worked in top-secret bio labs and that the clip was buried to hide a scheme, asking if the same man ran two pandemics by lab leak or deliberate deployment.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨1984 BANNED Frank Zappa interview reveals lab-created viruses as BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS – and it's NO COINCIDENCE Anthony Fauci oversaw BOTH HIV & COVID! Zappa’s father worked in TOP-SECRET chemical & biological warfare labs – Frank KNEW the dark truth: governments engineer plagues to target populations. HIV “emerges” in the 80s? Exactly when Fauci is running NIAID & steers the narrative. COVID hits? Same Fauci, same playbook, now forcing experimental “gene therapy” injections that REWRITE YOUR DNA forever. This clip was BURIED for decades because it exposes the plan. Why is the SAME guy in charge of TWO “once-in-a-century” pandemics? Lab leak? Or DELIBERATE DEPLOYMENT?

Saved - February 8, 2026 at 12:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe cholesterol isn’t the enemy; calcium drives most arterial plaque, not cholesterol. Inflammation causes atherosclerosis, with root factors like low vitamin D, magnesium, K2; calcium supplements, seed oils, sugar, insulin resistance, obesity, toxins, poor sleep, stress. A whole-food, low-carb diet focused on nutrient-dense animal foods, avoiding seed oils and sugar, supports a healthy cholesterol profile. Keep triglycerides low and HDL high; aim TG/HDL <1.5.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"Cholesterol isn't the enemy, it is essential...Don't blame cholesterol for the harm that calcium causes." ~Dr Hal Huggins "Only 0.5% of arterial plaque is Cholesterol...90% Of the plaque is Calcium." "So where's the problem...Calcium Or Cholesterol?" Cholesterol is the most important molecule in your body. 60% of your brain is fat & 30% of that is cholesterol. Your hormones, cell membranes & nervous system all depend on it. The mainstream message that high cholesterol causes clogged arteries is fraudulent & wrong. Studies show that arterial plaque is mostly calcium — not cholesterol. Only 0.5% of the plaque is cholesterol. The rest? Over 90% is calcium buildup. Atherosclerosis is caused by inflammation. Plaque is not a Cholesterol disease or a Statin deficiency. Cholesterol is not the cause of the Inflammation that turns to arterial plaque & atherosclerosis. The Root Causes of Inflammation include the following: Low Vitamin D Levels Magnesium Deficiency K2 Deficiency Calcium Supplements Industrial Seed Oils Processed Sugar Carbohydrates Insulin Resistance Ultra Processed Foods Smoking Obesity Environmental Toxins Poor Sleep Lack of Exercise Stress A whole food, low carbohydrate diet prioritizing nutrient dense animal foods, eliminating harmful seed oils & sugar, provides the best healthy cholesterol profile. This lifestyle keeps Triglycerides low & HDL high, which is one of the best biomarkers for heart health. TG/HDL ratio should be less than 1.5 to eliminate CVD risk.

Video Transcript AI Summary
- The speaker claims cholesterol is one of the most important things in the body and asserts, from “the scientific literature in cardiology,” that “everything that you hear in the advertisements for lowering cholesterol is fraudulent.” They say, “Cholesterol You betcha.” - They claim, “25 to 30% of the brain's made out of cholesterol,” and pose, “How many people need brains? Nobody in politics.” - On arterial plaque, they state: “What does it turn out to be? 1.5% of the plaque is fat, and of that, point 5% is cholesterol.” - They conclude, “90% of it's calcium. So where's the problem? Calcium or cholesterol? Calcium. You bet.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cholesterol happens to be one of the most important things in your body. I can assure you, and I can prove it from the scientific literature in cardiology, that everything that you hear in the advertisements for lowering cholesterol is fraudulent. Cholesterol You betcha. 25 to 30% of the brain's made out of cholesterol. How many people need brains? Nobody in politics. They talk about the cholesterol in the arteries. Yeah, that's been studied. What does it turn out to be? 1.5% of the plaque is fat, and of that, point 5% is cholesterol. 90% of it's calcium. So where's the problem? Calcium or cholesterol? Calcium. You bet.
Saved - February 7, 2026 at 2:55 PM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

WEF World Economic Forum Bioethicist, Dr Matthew Liao...We can induce 'meat allergy' to reduce meat consumption by using Lone Star Ticks as bioengineered weapons. https://t.co/f5o5AEJtge

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker presents two examples to illustrate how human engineering might address large-scale global problems. First, they argue that reducing meat consumption would significantly benefit the planet, but acknowledge that people are not willing to give up meat. Some individuals might be willing to cut back, yet they struggle with a weakness of will. The speaker admits personal temptations, noting that the steak’s juiciness can be a barrier to reducing meat intake. Second, the speaker discusses a potential approach to overcoming such barriers by leveraging human engineering to create intolerance to certain kinds of meat, particularly bovine proteins. They relate this to everyday experiences with intolerances, such as milk intolerance, and mention that some people are intolerant to crayfish. The idea is that if people could be engineered to be intolerant to specific meats, it could curb consumption. To illustrate a natural analogue, they reference the long star tick, which causes people to become allergic to meat after a bite. The speaker indicates that the mechanism behind this allergy exists and suggests that a similar mechanism could be replicated or induced in humans through engineering. The overarching claim is that such engineered intolerances could be a tool to address significant global problems by shaping dietary behaviors. In sum, the speaker contends that human engineering might be used to generate selective meat intolerances, drawing on real-world allergies as a model, and posits that this could help tackle major world issues related to meat consumption and its environmental impact. The discussion emphasizes the potential of engineering-driven solutions to influence human behavior in ways that could benefit the planet, while acknowledging human resistance and personal temptations to consume meat.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I'll give two examples. So one is that people eat too much meat, right? And if they were to cut down on their consumption on meat, then it would actually really help the planet. But people are not willing to give up meat. Some people will be willing to, but other people, they may be willing to, but they have a weakness of will. They say, Wow, this steak is just too juicy. I can't do it. I'm one of those, by the way. So here's a thought. So it turns out that we know a lot about so we have this intolerance to for example I have milk intolerance and some people are intolerant to crayfish. So possibly we can use human engineering to make it the case that we're intolerant to certain kinds of meat, to certain kinds of bovine proteins. And there's actually analogues of this in life. There's this thing called the long star tick, where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat. I can sort of describe the mechanism. So that's something that we can do through human engineering. We can kinda possibly address really big world problems through human engineering. Another
Saved - February 7, 2026 at 12:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve learned orthopedics tops medical corruption, with oncology close behind. Surgeons pick implants for kickbacks, not patient welfare. Medical errors are the 3rd leading cause of death in the U.S.—about 440,000 lives yearly. My protection: never leave a loved one alone in the hospital; have a trusted advocate there 24/7, especially at night. The system favors sick care profits over healing. Share experiences to expose risks.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Orthopedics is the most corrupt medical specialty — oncology ranks a close 2nd, according to investigative journalist Gardiner Harris. Surgeons choose implants & devices based on kickbacks, royalties & speaking fees rather than what’s best for the patient. Medical errors are now the 3rd leading cause of death in the U.S. — claiming roughly 440,000 lives every year (about 1,200 people per day). Your best protection? Never leave a loved one alone in the hospital. Have a trusted family member or advocate present 24/7, especially at night when visiting hours end. The system is built around “sick care” profits, not healing. Arrange overlapping shifts so the patient is never without protection. Have you or someone you know experienced implant failure, unnecessary surgery, or hospital negligence? Share your story below — the more we expose, the safer we become.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Orthopedics is described as by far the most corrupt form of medicine, with oncology identified as next in line. The speaker claims that orthopedic consultants frequently work for device companies, and as a result, the choice of the implanted device in a patient’s body is often determined by the amount of money a company will pay them to select that device. The speaker emphasizes that patients should know the manufacturer of the device inside them because recalls occur, and many people later learn that their hip or other implant needed to be removed because their doctor did not inform them. The speaker asserts that listeners should understand this information, especially if someone they love goes to the hospital. The speaker argues for being proactive in hospital settings, stating that you should have someone at the gate and with you at all times, asking questions, because this is your health and you need someone fighting for it. They reference a favorite study in medicine that surveyed doctors about their patients, noting that the patients whom doctors and nurses liked the least were the ones with the highest survival numbers. From this, the speaker implies that interpersonal dynamics between healthcare providers and patients may influence outcomes, though the claim focuses on the correlation observed in the survey. Finally, the speaker advises that when you go to the hospital, you should not try to be friends with everybody; this is your health and you need to fight for it, and you need someone there who is fighting for you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Orthopedics is by far the most corrupt form of medicine. Oncology is next. Orthopedics are routinely consultants for device companies and so the choice of the device that is in your body is often determined by the amount of money that one company will pay them in order to choose that device. You should know the manufacturer of the device inside of you because there are recalls. Many people never heard that they're hip needed to get pulled out of them because their doctor just simply didn't tell them you need to know this stuff if you have a loved one who goes to the hospital you need a service at the gate you have to have someone with you all the time asking questions one of my favorite studies in medicine was done was surveying doctors about their patients about who they liked and who they didn't like and the patients that were disliked the most by doctors and nurses had the highest survival numbers. When you go to the hospital, don't try to be friends with everybody. This is your health you need to fight for it and you need someone there fighting for
Saved - February 5, 2026 at 4:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I quote Dr. Hal Huggins: cholesterol is beneficial. I list 15 perceived benefits: absorption of vitamins A, D, E, K; digestion; immune protection; lower cancer and mortality risk; less depression and stress; protection from toxins; brain requires fat and cholesterol; prevents dementia; protects against mortality; steroid hormones; muscles and bones; protects against stroke and heart disease; lungs; building block of cells and mitochondria.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"The only bad thing about Cholesterol is not having enough!" ~Dr Hal Huggins "One of the biggest defenses against stroke is Cholesterol." Top 15 benefits of Cholesterol... 1) Absorption of Vitamins A, D, E & K. 2) Critical for digestion & bile acids. 3) Immune system protection against infections. 4) Lowers risk of cancer & death. 5) Lowers risk of depression & suicide. 6) Lowers stress, cortisol & anxiety. 7) Protects against chemicals, toxins & heavy metals. 8) Optimal Brain is 60% fat & 25% cholesterol. 9) Prevents dementia & cognitive decline. 10) Protects against all cause mortality. 11) Production of all steroid hormones. 12) Necessary for muscles & bone density. 13) Protective against stroke & heart disease. 14) Important for lungs & airways. 15) Building block of all cells & mitochondria.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that “Bad cholesterol” is a misnomer and claims it is “the biggest fraud.” They state they have spent countless hours researching cholesterol and that “None of it says anything about cholesterol being bad.” They assert that “The only bad thing about cholesterol is not having enough,” and claim that “One of the biggest defenses against stroke is cholesterol.” They further connect depression to serotonin levels, stating “Depression is directly related to how much serotonin is in the body,” and conclude that “Who controls the amount of serotonin that's manufactured? Cholesterol.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bad cholesterol is what makes estrogen and testosterone and aldosterone and cortisol and things like this. That's bad? This is the biggest fraud. I have spent countless hours working on cholesterol, which is all from the scientific literature. None of it says anything about cholesterol being bad. The only bad thing about cholesterol is not having enough. One of the biggest defenses against stroke is cholesterol. Depression is directly related to how much serotonin is in the body. Who controls the amount of serotonin that's manufactured? Cholesterol.
Saved - January 28, 2026 at 7:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe Fauci's COVID protocol as “no treatment until you go to the hospital, then ventilators & Remdesivir.” I allege Remdesivir killed people—“54% in 5 days” in the Ebola trial; the safety board ordered its termination, calling the study fraudulent and homicidal. I claim kidney, heart, and liver damage; infant approval at birth for 3 lb babies after limited testing. Doctors reportedly said the virus wasn’t to blame—Remdesivir was.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

RFK Jr. on Fauci's COVID protocols: "Our protocol was NO treatment until you go to the hospital. Then your treatments are two things: Ventilators & Remdesivir." "Tony Fauci knew that Remdesivir would kill you. It was lethal to 54% of people in 5 days during the Ebola trial." "The safety monitoring board ordered him to terminate the use of that drug when the 2019 Ebola trial failed." "He contrived an absolutely fraudulent study that he manipulated & orchestrated. It is homicide." How does Remdesivir kill? RFK Jr: "Kidney failure. Heart Failure. All organ collapse." The Ebola trial safety monitoring board halted & removed Remdesivir from the clinical setting, citing it was "too lethal & unethical" to be included as a possible Ebola treatment drug. • 2.81X Kidney failure—permanent damage in patients. • Heart damage: Triggers fatal arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, & bradycardia. • Liver injury: Causes severe, irreversible hepatocyte damage. • Infant approved: Now FDA-approved for newborns at birth as long as they weigh 3lbs—tested on just 58 infants for 10 days! Doctors during COVID stated: "We've never seen a virus that attacks the kidneys. Because, it wasn't the Virus. It was Remdesivir." Share your 'Run-Death-Is-Near' Remdesivir stories below...

Saved - January 27, 2026 at 3:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see BlackRock turning nature into tradable blockchain tokens—forests, rivers, ecosystems—creating infinite collateral for their debt machine, all under their AI Aladdin. Under the slogan of “saving the planet,” this isn’t environmentalism; it’s financial domination of life.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Whitney Webb..."BlackRock wants to turn EVERYTHING nature gave us—forests, rivers, entire ecosystems—into tradable Wall Street tokens on a blockchain." It's a heist: infinite new collateral for their endless debt machine, all tracked & controlled by their AI overlord, Aladdin. Under the feel-good banner of "saving the planet"? This isn't environmentalism. This is total financial domination of the living world.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The argument is that BlackRock, by unlocking and taking control of as many natural assets as possible that aren't currently part of the financial system, can deepen and expand its control over not just people in the existing financial system, but really over the natural world as well and essentially turn everything alive into a tradable Wall Street financial product. The goal, as described for Larry Fink in particular, is to develop new asset classes that can be used to fuel their existing business model and perpetuate it for millennia forward. One idea discussed for years is natural assets, what they call nature's economy—actual assets as possible that aren't currently part of the financial system—as a way to perpetuate what they do and broaden their control over the natural world, turning the natural world into tradable financial products. The supposed plan includes having all of this on a universal ledger on blockchain, presumably, and making it trackable and surveillable, so that it can be surveillable and automated. In this framework, Larry Fink would have his risk management AI—Aladdin—exercise control over these assets in unprecedented ways, to serve their benefit. Concurrently, there is movement toward a new financial governance system that pushes infrastructure toward a “green model” or decarbonization. The broader aim of the global carbon market, according to the narrative, is to unlock many new assets and far more collateral, enabling the creation of new debt and expanding the existing models to unprecedented levels, effectively perpetuating them indefinitely. A central feature of the natural asset concept, at least in the natural asset corporation model, is that you identify a natural asset such as a forest, river, or lake, and then, at no cost to you, you issue shares in that natural asset and sell those shares. The implication is that you can point to something in the natural world and declare it yours, fractionalize it, and generate money almost out of thin air by selling those shares. The natural world is vast, and the claim is that they’re financializing it all, framing it as the only way to save the planet. But really, it’s the only way for them to save their insane debt racket.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As an asset manager, you know, BlackRock having being able to unlock and take control of as many natural assets as as possible that aren't currently part of the financial system is obviously, a way for them to perpetuate what they do and deepen and expand their control over not just people in the existing financial system, but really over the natural world as well and essentially turn everything alive into a tradable Wall Street financial product. It seems like in Larry Fink's case in particular, there's a goal, well, a big ambition there to develop new asset classes that can be used to basically fuel their existing business model and perpetuate it for like, I don't know, millennia forward. So one of these that I wrote, I've been writing about for a few years is the whole idea of natural assets, what they call nature's economy. Actual assets as possible that aren't currently part of the financial system is obviously a way for them to perpetuate what they do and deepen and expand their control over not just, you know, people in the existing financial system, but really over the natural world as well and essentially turn everything alive into a tradable Wall Street financial product. And the goal, as Fink has stated, is to have all of this on a universal ledger on blockchain presumably and have it be trackable and surveillable by having it all surveillable and automated in a sense, he's able to have his risk management AI thing, Aladdin sort of exercise control over it in unprecedented ways, I think, for their benefit. And then of course, lot of what's happening now as we're moving into this new financial governance system is the push to change all of the infrastructure towards this, you know, quote unquote green model, I guess, or decarbonization. Part of the goal of the whole global carbon market thing for them is that it allows them to unlock so many new assets and so much more collateral and so much other stuff to create new debt out of and to just sort of expand the existing models they use to just unprecedented levels and sort of perpetuate this into infinity. One of the things too about the natural asset thing, at least as far as the natural asset corporation model is concerned, is that you literally just go into a forest or you go to a river or lake and you identify the natural asset and then at no cost to you, just after identifying it, you issue shares in the natural asset, a lake, a forest, whatever, and then you sell those shares. I mean, it's literally just pointing out something outside and being like, this is mine, I'm going to fractionalize it and sell it to people and you're producing money in like out of thin air essentially. And you're able to do that. Mean the natural world is vast and huge and they're they're doing this. They're financializing it all as framing it as the only way to save the planet. But really it's the only way for them to save their insane debt racket.
Saved - January 23, 2026 at 11:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that 100% of the top twenty fast-food brands tested contained glyphosate. Panera Bread had the highest at 439.11 ppb; Chipotle the lowest at 4.65 ppb (94.4x lower). Arby’s, Dairy Queen, and Little Caesars also showed high levels (223.33, 126, 128 ppb). Panda Express and McDonald’s were 4.75 and 5.58 ppb. Across 42 meals, total glyphosate reached 2089 ppb, and the piece cites animal studies where 0.1 ppb caused organ damage.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"100% of Top Twenty Fast Food brands contained alarming levels of Glyphosate." -Zen Honeycutt Panera Bread, a self-proclaimed proprietor of 'clean, wholesome foods' ranked highest worst Glyphosate of 439 ppb. Chipotle ranked safest, with 94X lower Glyphosate of only 4.6 ppb. Glyphosate Causes: liver & kidney disease, kills sperm, has been shown to androgenize baby girls, increase autism symptoms, increased miscarriages & prenatal births & birth defects. Population Control is a globalist initiative and this poison is being put in our food? Coincidence?….How is this legal? Food in America is chemical poison. Glyphosate Fast Food Testing Results... -100% of Top Twenty Fast Food brands contained alarming glyphosate residues. -Studies in lab animals show that 0.1 ppb of glyphosate cause liver & organ damage. -The highest levels detected totaling 439.11 ppb were in Panera Bread, a self-proclaimed proprietor of "good food" & "clean, wholesome foods." -The second highest levels of glyphosate were found in Arby's sandwiches, totaling 223.33 ppb of glyphosate. -Dairy Queen & Little Caesar’s were nearly tied for third highest, at 126 ppb & 128 ppb total glyphosate detected, respectively. -The lowest levels were found in Chipotle meals, totaling 4.65 ppb, a whopping 94.4 times lower than the highest level, 439.11 ppb detected in Panera Bread. Chipotle was one of the first fast food restaurants to advertise non-GMO and organic ingredients. -Next lowest were Panda Express & McDonald's at 4.75 and 5.58 ppb, respectively. -The total amount of glyphosate detected in 42 types of fast food meals (between 1-3 samples of each were used for testing for hundreds of contaminants) was 2089 ppb, a level over 20,000 times higher than the amount (.1 ppb) that has been found to cause severe organ damage, specifically liver disease, in animal studies.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Zen from Moms Across America states that Panera Bread had the highest level of glyphosate among all of the top 20 fast food restaurants tested. They acknowledge Panera’s public claim of “clean ingredients,” and emphasize that glyphosate is not clean. Glyphosate, known widely as Roundup, is described as the most widely used herbicide in the world. It is called a carcinogen and an endocrine disruptor, and is said to cause liver and kidney disease. It is described as a neurotoxin and a nervous system damager, and is said to kill sperm and to androgenize baby girls. The speaker notes that these effects are from animal studies. Zen mentions that there are many human studies as well showing a connection to increased miscarriages and prenatal births and birth defects. The message is that Panera Bread needs to do better, and they should put glyphosate on their no-no list and require that their suppliers only provide wheat and grains that have not been sprayed with glyphosate. The speaker states that they are asking Panera to do that, and that thousands of signatures are needed. The speaker urges viewers to visit momsacrossamerica.org, click on action, and find the fast food petitions page under action. The goal is to help get Panera to put glyphosate on the no-no list, describing this as a huge win for the food industry because Panera is one of the biggest purchasers of wheat products, using it for sandwich breads across the country. The appeal is for petition signatures to press Panera to adopt a glyphosate-free standard for their ingredients.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys, Zen from Moms Across America. Did you know that Panera Bread had the highest level of glyphosate of all of the top 20 fast food restaurants we tested? Yes. And they are the ones that say right on the wall, clean ingredients. Well folks, glyphosate is not clean, okay? Glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide in the world. You may know it as Roundup, and it is a carcinogen, an endocrine disruptor. It causes liver and kidney disease. It's a neurotoxin and a nervous system damager. It also kills sperm and has been shown to androgenize baby girls, increase autism symptoms in baby male These are all animal studies. There are many human studies as well showing connection to increased miscarriages and prenatal births and birth defects. So is Panera Bread needs to do better, okay? They can put glyphosate on their no no list and they can require that their suppliers only give them wheat and grains that have not been sprayed with glyphosate. So we're asking them to do that. We need thousands signatures, folks. We really need to get this done. Go to momsacrossamerica.org, click on action, and under action is our fast food petitions page. Please help us get Panera to put glyphosate on the no no list. And this would be huge for the food industry cause Panera is one of the biggest purchasers of, you know, wheat products out there. They use it sandwich breads all, you know, day long and in all across the country. So please help us get the petition signed.
Saved - January 22, 2026 at 10:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that the government backs Monsanto in Supreme Court efforts to dodge Roundup cancer liability. Paraquat, 28X deadlier than glyphosate, can kill with 1 teaspoon and has no antidote. Dr. Tarek Pacha warns it’s the top toxic ingredient in our food system. DEC 2, 2025 update notes MAHA allies furious as Big Ag envoys push immunity. Paraquat causes multi-organ failure, pulmonary fibrosis, Parkinson’s risk, thyroid disease, cancers, and more across many crops.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨 BREAKING: Government Sides with Monsanto to Shield Roundup from Cancer Lawsuits – Betraying MAHA Allies. Paraquat, 28X MORE Lethal Than Glyphosate, Is Another Legal Poison With US EPA Approval! One Sip Can Kill A Human with NO Antidote! 🚨 As a functional urologist & surgeon, Dr. Tarek Pacha warns: This is the #1 toxic ingredient to AVOID – the legal poison dousing America's crops, fueling an epidemic of Parkinson's, cancer & organ failure. The US EPA refuses to join the global ban, while over 10 million pounds are sprayed yearly on our food supply. **DEC 2, 2025 UPDATE:** The Government is backing Monsanto (now Bayer) in its Supreme Court push to evade liability for cancer claims tied to Roundup weedkiller. This enrages Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) allies, who fight Big Ag's toxic grip – yet here we are, letting paraquat ravage lives unchecked also. Paraquat is 28X MORE TOXIC THAN GLYPHOSATE: Just 1 teaspoon can kill a human, triggering multi-organ shutdown with no cure. Here's the devastating toll: 1⃣ **Multi-Organ Failure:** After ingestion, inhalation, or skin exposure, organs start failing on day 1 – lungs, liver, kidneys, heart systematically collapsing. Victims can suffer up to 30 agonizing days before death. 2⃣ **Pulmonary Fibrosis:** Paraquat triggers irreversible lung scarring, causing chronic, excruciating pain and a desperate fight for every breath. High mortality, zero antidote – 28X deadlier than glyphosate. 3⃣ **Parkinson's Disease:** The brutal reality? Scientists use paraquat to *induce* Parkinson's in lab animals for research. As a neurotoxin, it destroys dopamine neurons, spiking Parkinson's risk by up to 6X. Paraquat also fuels thyroid disease & cancer, CKD (chronic kidney disease), childhood leukemia & non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. **Common Crops Drenched in Paraquat:** Soybean, corn, grapes, peanuts, pistachios, almonds, cotton, wheat & oats. (Sneaky alert: They hide in oils, additives, sweeteners & animal feed – hitting *everyone*.)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Pasha, a functional urologist and surgeon, identifies paraquat as the number one toxic ingredient to ban. He notes it is a legal poison spread across America and into our food, a highly toxic herbicide that kills weeds but kills us fast. Despite being banned in over 70 countries, including China, paraquat is still widely used in American agriculture, with up to eight to ten million pounds spread on farmland. The biggest offenders he cites include crops such as soybeans, corn, peanuts, grapes, pistachios, and even cotton used for clothing. He criticizes a recent development: section 454 or 453 (referred to as “section four fifty three” in the talk) a bill passed with no public vote. He claims this bill shields companies like Syngenta, the maker of paraquat, and similar companies from the consequences of poisoning Americans, and that the EPA approves it while the body rejects it. He explains the paradox of this situation in his view. Regarding how deadly paraquat is, Dr. Pasha states that one sip can kill you and there is no antidote. He explains that paraquat causes multi-organ failure, including the lungs, liver, kidneys, and even the heart. It causes pulmonary fibrosis, as paraquat accumulates in the lungs and, over time, can cause scarring leading to respiratory failure. He also claims a link to Parkinson’s disease, indicating exposure could increase the risk of acquiring Parkinson’s disease by up to six times. Additional concerns he mentions include higher farmer mortality, DNA cellular death, and reproductive problems. He references legal action, mentioning that there are 6,354 and counting lawsuits as of July 2025 with the maker Syngenta in settlement talks. Bottom line, he asserts, paraquat is not just a weed killer; it is a neurotoxic, lung-scarring, DNA-mutant chemical sprayed on foods. Although banned globally, it remains in use in the USA. What can be done now, according to Dr. Pasha? Share this information with loved ones; buy local and know your farmer—ask if they use herbicides such as paraquat or other herbicides. If possible, choose regenerative or organic options. He also urges avoiding ultra-processed foods with conventional ingredients and directs viewers to see the caption below for lists of foods most heavily sprayed by paraquat and other offenders. He concludes by encouraging voting with one’s wallet, asserting that people will be listened to when they make healthy choices, promoting “Healthy choices, stronger you.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The number one toxic ingredient that I would ban right now. Go grab a pen. Write it down. I'm doctor Pasha, functional urologist and surgeon here to challenge the status quo. Ready, Max? I'm referring to paraquat, a legal poison that is spread all across America and into our food. It's a highly toxic herbicide that kills weeds but kills us fast. Despite being banned in over 70 countries, including China, paraquat is still widely used in American agriculture. A staggering amount of up to eight to 10,000,000 pounds of paraquat are spread or used across our farmland. The biggest offenders include soybean, corn, peanuts, grapes, pistachios, and even cotton that make our clothes. Guys, what actually disgust me is that just this week, section four fifty three, it's a bill passed with no public vote. This bill shields company like Syngenta, the maker of Paraquat, and companies like that from the consequences of poisoning Americans. And the EPA approves it, yet our body rejects it. How so? Let me tell you. How deadly is this stuff? One sip can kill you, and there is no antidote. Paraquat actually causes multi organ failure such as lung, liver, kidney, and even heart. Number two, pulmonary fibrosis. Paraquat actually accumulates in your lungs and over time can cause scarring, which could lead to respiratory failure down the road. And number three, Parkinson's disease. Exposure could increase your risk of acquiring Parkinson's disease by up to six times. Not to mention it has been associated with higher farmer mortality, DNA cellular death, and reproductive problems. There are 6,354 and counting lawsuits as of July 2025 with the maker Syngenta in settlement talks as we speak. Bottom line, paraquat is not just a weed killer. It's a neurotoxic, lung scarring, DNA mutant chemical that is sprayed all over our food. It's banned globally, but not here in The USA. What can we do right now? Number one, you can share this information with all your loved ones. Number two, buy local. Know your farmer. Ask your farmers. Do they use herbicides such as paraquat or any other herbicides? And if that's not possible, buy regenerative and or organic. And finally, we must really avoid ultra processed foods with with conventional ingredients. And to see the foods most heavily sprayed by Paraquat and other offenders, see the caption below. Guys, we must vote with our wallets. And when we do, I assure you that they will listen. Healthy choices, stronger you. Until next time.
Saved - January 22, 2026 at 4:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I warn that modern cars are surveillance cages on wheels. 10+ cameras focus on you; ADAS tracks eyes, hands, blink rate—not for safety, but control. Geofencing hides in terms, potential remote activation could slow, shut off, or lock you out beyond approved zones. Data could flow to authorities—driving identity, times, locations. Fight back: reject smart cars, read fine print, demand analog options. Freedom shouldn’t need an OFF switch they control.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Dr. Michael Yeadon warns..."Modern cars are no longer just vehicles—they’re surveillance cages on wheels." Think about it: 🔹 10+ cameras per car, most facing YOU, not the road. 🔹 ADAS systems track your eyes, hands, even blink rate—not for safety, but control. 🔹 Geofencing is already buried in T&Cs—your car could soon refuse to drive beyond gov't approved zones. This isn’t paranoia—it’s policy. A lawyer recently discovered her "dealer update" included hidden consent for remote geofencing activation. Once enabled, your car could: ⚠️ Slow down or shut off if you cross invisible boundaries. ⚠️ Lock you out if you cover your face (hello, digital ID). ⚠️ Feed data straight to authorities—who’s driving, where, when. Fifteen-minute cities? Imagine your car enforcing them. Try leaving your zone when your vehicle’s software decides you can’t. "They’re not building convenience—they’re building compliance." The endgame? A world where you don’t own your drive—you’re just renting it from those who control the code. Fight back. ✔️ Reject "smart" cars. ✔️ Read the fine print. ✔️ Demand analog alternatives. Because freedom shouldn’t come with an "OFF" switch they control.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses growing concern about how modern cars are becoming surveillance devices through automated driver assistance systems (ADAS) and connected technology. He describes a recent rental car as full of surveillance features, noting that ADAS regulations are EU-based but likely to be adopted worldwide. These systems can beep for minor speed overages and require constant attention to the windscreen; they can also shout if you remove your hands from the wheel. He cites that, on average, there are more than ten cameras in a car, most of which face inward to monitor the driver, with at least one camera focusing on the eyes to assess whether the driver is looking at the screen or is tired, suggesting that the goal is to ensure the driver cannot effectively control the car. He introduces the concept of geofencing, describing it as a feature that could restrict a vehicle’s operation when it crosses the edge of a defined boundary, such as the boundary of a “fifteen minute city.” He explains that with always-on, connected cars, crossing the boundary could trigger the car to slow down or enter a limp mode, allowing only first and second gear and effectively preventing out-of-bound travel. He urges listeners to look up geofencing as a standalone term and shares a personal anecdote: a dealer updated a car, and the owner had to accept new terms and conditions that allowed the manufacturer and authorities to activate geofencing software in the vehicle. The speaker connects these technologies to broader identification and tracking systems, suggesting that the car already reveals its location and that the owners' identity could be inferred by associating the car with the driver through facial recognition captured by in-car cameras. He speculates that masking could prevent the car from starting, and he imagines an intentionally malicious designer could exploit such features. He asks whether this is the world people want and expresses a personal desire to detach from the Internet and digital devices, even at the cost of inconvenience, as a way to avoid concentrated control. He emphasizes that the crucial point is a world that cannot be taken over by a small number of people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, yep, that's one big concern I've got. You might think why would I comment? I I like machinery. I commented before that I like wrenching, spanner in my own vehicles, car cars and bikes, bikes mainly. I And was filmed in 2020 in my bike shed. So I paid attention at least to to automotive changes. I recently had a a hire car on holiday, which was brand new, and I hated it. The thing is full of surveillance technology. It's full of, I think they're called ADAS, automated driver assistance system, something like that. ADAS. And it's it's an EU set of regulations, but it will be rolled out worldwide. And they're the things that are slightly irritating that beep at you if you're three miles an hour over the prevailing speed limit, will shout at you if you're if you don't stare at the windscreen constantly. If you take a hand off the wheel, it'll tell you to put your hand back on the wheel. Those have on average, I read in a trade press, some over 10 cameras in the car, only a few of which are outside. Most of the cameras are facing inside and facing you. You are being recorded at all times that you're driving. It's, one of them focuses on your on your eyes so that it's checking whether you're looking through the screen, whether you're tired or not, if your blink rate slows. And this is not to assist you. This is ultimately to ensure that you will not be able to control and drive your own car. So let's give you one example. You must have heard of fifteen minute cities, even if you think it's a conspiracy theory. Just imagine your fifteen minute city is a radius of, say, three miles from where you live. It might be that much in bad traffic. With these always on cars that are connected, what do you think will happen when your vehicle crosses the edge of that fifteen minute boundary? Well, I know what's going to happen when it is turned on. The vehicle will probably slow down. It probably won't stop immediately, but it will be disabled. It'll go into limp mode, and you'll only get into first and second gear. They're not going to allow you to drive out of the fifteen minute zone in a modern car. And there there are so many other things. That's called geofencing. Geofencing, one word. Go and look it up. I know personally somebody whose car was updated as a favor from a dealer, and when she got it back, being a lawyer, she happened to notice that she had to accept new terms and conditions, and being had she had plenty of time she went through the terms and conditions. And one of them was when you say okay, you will allow the manufacturer and the authorities to activate geofencing software in this car. That's what they're going to do. So, you know, and that will ultimately be probably related to your things like your digital ID. Otherwise, where do they know where you are? Well, with the car, they know where the car is. But they probably want to associate the owner of the car. They'll they'll know who's in it, because your face is in multiple cameras. So they'll know who's in it. If you try to cover your face with a mask, I suspect the car won't start, if that isn't already incorporated. If I was an evil person, I designed that. And you can assume that whoever's running this are more evil than me, and more imaginative. Is this the world you want? It's not the world I want. Honestly, I would I would detach the Internet, turn it off, and jump up and down on all the digital devices if I could. Yeah. Lots of things would become inconvenient, but it's a much better world. And what's crucial about that world is it cannot be taken over by a small number of people.
Saved - January 20, 2026 at 6:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting that planes and helicopters are dropping millions of live, genetically engineered rabies vaccine baits across six states, with no public notice or consent. The USDA confirms the spread, coating rural areas with RABORAL V-RG®. The baits carry a live recombinant virus that can persist and shed for weeks, potentially infecting multiple species. The CDC warns people may be at risk for infection, yet authorities proceed. Critics call it an open-air experiment, not rabies control.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Planes & helicopters are dropping millions of live, genetically engineered rabies “vaccine baits” across America—without public notice or consent. The USDA confirms the operation spans 6 states, coating rural communities with lab-made oral vaccines known as RABORAL V-RG®. What most don’t realize is that these baits contain a live recombinant virus capable of infecting multiple species. A 2019 Vaccine study found it can persist & shed for weeks, leaving animals contagious long after exposure. Even the CDC admits people may be “at risk for vaccine virus infection.” Yet, the government keeps flooding forests, waterways & neighborhoods with millions of these live-virus doses—wrapped in fishmeal attractant—without public disclosure or independent safety oversight. Experts warn this isn’t rabies control. It’s an open-air experiment on the American people.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript discusses a plan attributed to the U.S. Department of Agriculture to airdrop oral rabies vaccines into six states over the course of a month, continuing a process that started in August in other states. The states named are Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, all of which are expected to receive these vaccines. The plan involves dropping edible satchels of food that are designed to attract wildlife. These satchels are described as containing an oral rabies vaccine, so that when wildlife consumes them, the animals are vaccinated against rabies. It is stated that this vaccination occurs without the animals’ consent, noting that animals cannot give consent. A key question raised is what would come next after this initial distribution. The speaker asks about the implications if these satchels are spread across the stated areas and whether there will be any impact on domestic pets. The transcript asserts that the satchels are intended for wildlife vaccination and that if cats and dogs end up consuming one of the satchels, it should be okay for them and they would simply be vaccinated against rabies. The speaker contends that many people have presumably already vaccinated their animals against rabies, so the program is framed as not causing harm to pets. The speaker then reflects on the broader pattern, asserting that this is how such programs begin. The argument is made that the authorities start with animals, referencing a history of starting with animals when a rabies problem is presented as an epidemic in wildlife. The speaker notes that people are concerned about wild animals biting dogs and other animals, and that the plan is presented as a measure to prevent rabies transmission in the animal population. Finally, the transcript asserts a claim about the progression of this approach, stating that this is how it begins and arguing that there is a suggestion of eventual vaccination or interventions targeting the human population, asserting that “they’ve already started to do this” with humans. The overall content centers on the described vaccination plan, its intended wildlife focus, its effects on pets, and concerns about potential expansion to humans.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To airdrop vaccines into six states. Excuse me. What? Yeah. The US Department of Agriculture is planning to airdrop rabies vaccines into six states over the course of the month, continuing a process that started in August year in other states. They're gonna be doing this in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. They're all going to be receiving these vaccines. Okay. So these are rabies vaccines. They are planning on air dropping them across across these states, these little, like, edible satchels of food. And they're gonna be air dropping these little edible satchels of food that are gonna attract wildlife because, apparently, there's a rabies epidemic in the wildlife. And they're gonna drop these little satchels that are gonna that that that contain an oral rabies vaccine. And when the animals eat it, they are now vaccinated against rabies, all against, you know, their consent. Of course, we always vaccinate animals against their consent. They can't consent. Right? But the big question about this is then, okay, what's next? Right? So if they're going to be putting these satchels and they're spreading them all around, and they say, yes, it's fine for your cats and dogs. If your cats and dogs end up, you know, getting one of these satchels, it should be okay for them. It's not gonna harm them. They're just gonna end up being vaccinated against the rabies. Again, probably you've already vaccinated your animals against rabies. So they're saying, no. It's all fine. It's all good. Right? But this is how it begins. Right? I mean, this is the type this is how it begins is that they are going to start with the animals just just like they always start with the children who can't consent. They start with the animals, and they say, well, we have to. We must. We must because there's a big rabies epidemic going on. And then people say, okay. Yeah. We don't want wild animals biting our dogs, you know, getting into our backyard and biting our animals or dogs when they fight them, and then our dog ends up with rabies. Although you probably have already vaccinated your dog dog against rabies. But, certainly, you don't want a bunch of rabid animals running around. I understand that. But this is the reasoning. I mean, this is what they will use when they decide to airdrop vaccines to the human population. They've already started to do this.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

credit: @KimIversenShow

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@Mofobian I did, the video verbalizes all 6 states.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@cynhope54 It's the systematic poisoning of everyone, including all animal life.

Saved - January 18, 2026 at 11:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explain that using statins daily blocks cholesterol needed for cell repair, depletes CoQ10, dolichol, and heme A, and can affect brain cholesterol and energy, risking cognitive issues. PPIs and H2 blockers lower stomach acid, harming digestion and nutrient absorption, with long‑term risks like cancer, kidney disease, Alzheimer's, heart attack, stroke, and fractures. Antibiotics devastate the gut microbiome, with fluoroquinolones causing serious heart and vascular damage. I’m asking for your thoughts.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Your Body CAN'T Heal If You're Popping These 3 Drug Classes Daily—And Here's Why It's Sabotaging Your Health!🚨 Medicines meant to "help" often block true healing. Let's break it down: - **Statins (Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs):** You won't heal without cholesterol—it's essential for cell repair. Statins block its production, causing massive fallout: - Depletes CoQ10, leading to muscle pain, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cell death. - Stops dolichol, key for brain protein function—linked to Parkinson's and other disorders. - Inhibits Heme A in your energy chain, plus damages liver/pancreas, spiking insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. - Crosses the blood-brain barrier, shutting down brain cholesterol and fueling cognitive decline/Alzheimer's. - **PPI Acid Reducers & H2 Blockers:** Shutting down stomach acid kills digestion and nutrient absorption—your body starves from the inside. - Just 5 days of use drops acid by 65%; longer term, it's near zero, crashing immunity and causing malnutrition. - After 1 year? Devastating risks: - 80% ↑ gastric cancer - 28% ↑ kidney disease - 40% ↑ Alzheimer's - 70% ↑ heart attack - 30% ↑ stroke - 44% ↑ hip fractures - **Antibiotics (Especially Frequent Use):** They wipe out your gut microbiome—the foundation of immunity and digestion. - Kills good bacteria, leading to issues like yeast infections and deadly C. Diff. - Worst offenders? Fluoroquinolones (like Cipro & Levaquin)—these fluoride-laced bombs cause permanent damage: - Ruptures/tears in the aorta, plus mitral/aortic regurgitation. - 85% ↑ heart arrhythmias - 71% ↑ cardiovascular death - Linked to sudden death or lifelong injury in millions. Ditch the quick fixes—focus on root causes for real healing. What are your thoughts? RT if this hits home! Cited research is below + bonus post sharing how I healed from decades of addiction to GERD PPI Proton Pump Inhibitors & Acid Reducing Rx Medications...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker identifies three drug classes that allegedly prevent healing. First, statins: they inhibit the HMG CoA reductase enzyme, which means you don’t make adequate amounts of CoQ10, heme, dol recall, print a late your proteins, etc., so you don’t make cholesterol. Second, proton pump inhibitors: you cannot deal because you shut down your digestion; you need stomach acid to digest food and to assimilate vitamins, minerals, proteins, and fats. Third, antibiotics: when you frequently take antibiotics, you kill the gut microbiome, and when you kill your gut microbiome, you cannot assimilate your nutrients, leading to leaky gut and intestinal hyperpermeability. The speaker emphasizes not taking antibiotics unless it’s an emergency. In summary, the three drug classes cited as harmful to healing are antibiotics, statin drugs, and proton inhibitors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Three drug classes where your body cannot heal if you're taking these drugs. Number one, statins. So statins inhibit the HMG CoA reductase enzyme, which means you don't make adequate amounts of co q ten, heme, dol recall. You don't print a late your proteins, etcetera. So, of course, you don't make cholesterol. So how are you gonna heal when you don't make cholesterol? Number two, class of drugs you don't wanna take is proton pump inhibitors. You cannot deal because you just shut down your digestion. You need stomach acid to digest your food, and so you can assimilate all the vitamins, minerals, proteins, and fats. So big problem if you're taking proton pump inhibitors. You cannot deal when you're on that class of drugs. And number three, when you frequently take antibiotics or whenever you take antibiotics, you kill the gut microbiome. When you kill your gut microbiome, all bets are off. You cannot assimilate your nutrients, leaky gut, intestinal hyperpermeability, big problem. So you do not wanna take the antibiotics unless it's an emergency, obviously. So most people take them like candy. So those are the three classes of drugs, antibiotics, statin drugs, and proton inhibitors. Do not take those drugs if you want to heal.
Saved - January 17, 2026 at 5:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user asserts mRNA injections were invented by the military, not Pfizer/Moderna or Warp Speed, based on a 2012 DARPA blueprint and a supposed government-gone-weaponized-plan for control. A responder notes the idea predates 2012. Another point adds Dr. Hotez saying SARS-CoV vaccines were a 17-year process starting in 2003.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨TRUTH EXPOSED: "The military invented mRNA injections, not Pfizer or Moderna—not Operation Warp Speed." —Dr. Peter McCullough, MD This wasn't Big Pharma's 'miracle'...it was a DARPA MILITARY blueprint from 2012—a DECADE before COVID! Planned gov't weaponized op for control. https://t.co/mxRXbr9e4d

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses the origin and framing of pandemic prevention and vaccine development as a military-led initiative. He cites a 2012 DARPA program called the Adept Protect p three program, described as a pandemic prevention platform. The proposal outlined the use of gene-encoded vaccines based on RNA or DNA with the goal of stopping a pandemic within sixty days. He suggests that, by the time President Trump referenced “Operation Warp Speed” to develop vaccines, there should have been preparation and acknowledgement that this work dated back to 2012, making it not rapid innovation but a decade-long effort. He argues that the public narrative of rapid development and stunning innovation surrounding vaccines is deceptive and that contractors like Moderna had already secured multi-million-dollar contracts in 2013. He notes that the military operates programs addressing biological threats and also works on answers such as monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. The claim is made that the military originated the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, and not in response to the outbreak from Wuhan. According to the speaker, this is a military program in origin and administration. The speaker asserts that Health and Human Services, under Alex Azar, together with the Department of Defense, ushered the public into a vaccine era, framing Emergency Use Authorization as a mechanism to rapidly deploy new technology into the military rather than the public. He contends that this mechanism’s broad public application began with the COVID-19 pandemic, which is presented as evidence that the FDA lacks ownership or control over the process because the program is characterized as military in origin and execution. The overall claim is that the program operates like a military operation with universal reach and without exemptions, implying a deeply embedded military approach to vaccine development and deployment. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the continuity from a 2012 program proposal through to the public health landscape observed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting that the military’s involvement, timeline, and governance underlie the current vaccine paradigm and its regulatory pathways.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2012, DARPA, which is the research division of the military, started a program. It's called the Adept Protect p three program, pandemic prevention platform. Look what they proposed. They said, listen, we are going to use gene encoded vaccines as a new category of preventive measures based on RNA or DNA. And in this approach, we will stop a pandemic within sixty days. Within sixty days, in 2012, this was started. When president Trump came out and said it's operation warp speed and they're gonna develop vaccines, it would have been nice if he was prepped or Anthony Fauci was prepped to say, listen. We're working on this. We've been working on this since 2012. This is not new. This isn't warp speed. This is ten years and coming. The deception out in the open that this was rapidly developed, that there was all this stunning innovation. The contractors, Moderna got its first multi million dollar contract in 2013. The military works on programs, both the threat, SARS CoV two, and work on the answer, monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. But the military has biological threat programs. There's one for smallpox monkeypox, there's one for anthrax, and who knows how many more programs. This was part of a program. But the military came up with the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, not Operation Warp Speed. It wasn't in response to what was you know, came out of Wuhan, China. This is a military program. When it was announced by Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, and the Department of Defense, that's who entered into this you know, ushered us into the vaccine era, the military. Emergency use authorization is a mechanism to get rapid new technology into the military. It's not a mechanism for the public. Its first application broadly to the public was when the COVID-nineteen pandemic. That's the reason why the FDA doesn't seem like they have any ownership over this. They can't seem to respond to it because it's a military program. This has a military origin to it, and the program is executed like a military program. No one will be spared. There's no exceptions. You can kinda see that the similarities there.

@PPR_Mile - Mile Kovačević ☦🇺🇸🦅

@ValerieAnne1970 Earlier than 2012. Dr. Peter Hotez stated the SARS-CoV/coronavirus vaccines were a 17 year process on 12/09/2020 since 2003. https://t.co/UQciFeSrbU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Hotez explains that while vaccines are often described as miraculous, the development was not a four-month process but a seventeen-year effort dating back to the post-SARS period. After SARS emerged in 2003, researchers identified the spike protein as the virus’s soft underbelly and began experimental vaccine development. When the COVID-19 sequence was released in January, the coronavirus community quickly concluded that a vaccine could be made, and attention turned to which technology would be fastest and most enduring. All vaccines discussed (AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, and the one being scaled in India) target the spike protein. He emphasizes that this was a deliberate long-term program, not a rushed push. Nicole notes the broader context of vaccine safety, particularly on a day when a vaccine-skeptical witness testified before the Senate Homeland Security Committee. Dr. Hotez clarifies that the virus behind the current pandemic comes from a family of coronaviruses scientists have studied for a long time, and that once specifics emerged, researchers could finalize the vaccine approach. He reiterates the importance of reassurance about safety in light of public skepticism. Dr. Hotez highlights the role of the NIH and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, led by Tony Fauci, and Francis Collins at NIH, in launching a major coronavirus program beginning in 2003. This funding enabled the development of some of the first prototype vaccines, illustrating a deliberate US government and NIH investment to advance vaccine research. He notes the ongoing need to assess rollout and production robustness, as this technology is brand new, and additional vaccines will be necessary to vaccinate populations. Looking ahead, the conversation acknowledges that the United States will require four or five different vaccines to achieve broad vaccination coverage, rather than relying solely on the two mRNA vaccines. The UK has begun vaccinations, marking an initial step, with plans to scale in the United States in the coming days. The discussion underscores a long road ahead to ensure scalable production, distribution, and multiple vaccine options to meet demand.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor. Hotez, clearly the logistics of vaccinating the world. Because I think one of the lessons, and this is something Laurie Garrett and I talked about in the last hour, is that if the whole world isn't safe, then none of us are safe. But talk about both aspects of Cures reporting, the significance of vaccinations commencing today in The UK and the long, long road ahead. Speaker 1: Yeah. A few things, Nicole. You know, everyone is talking about what a miracle the vaccines are, and they are a miracle in one sense. But, you know, sometimes people think that these vaccines just popped out of nowhere over a period of four months. And one of the things that I've been trying to explain to people if they think vaccines are rushed, this is not a four month process. This is a seventeen year process. The discovery and development of vaccines for coronaviruses began seventeen years ago after SARS emerged in 2003. That was the first big pandemic. Coronavirus has started out of South China and shut down Toronto, Canada for a while. That's when we identified the spike protein as the as the soft underbelly of the virus. That's when experimental vaccines first developed So that when the Chinese put up this the sequence of COVID nineteen on bioRxiv in January, the coronavirus community the community of coronavirus vaccine researchers looked at this and said, oh, we got this. We know how to make a COVID nineteen vaccine. And then it was a matter of which technology could go the first, could be the fastest, and which technology would be the most enduring. And and so all of the vaccines that you're hearing about, whether it's AstraZeneca or Pfizer or Moderna or J and J or ours, which is being scaled in India, all all target the the that spike protein. And that's important that people realize that this was not rushed. This was a deliberate long term, program. So it's really exciting to see this vaccine go into, Maggie's arm, and, we're so thrilled for her and her family. And this will be scaled up in England, and now we'll be moving to The US, I think, in a few days. Speaker 0: I I think what you said sounds like it's very important in the category of reassuring people of the safety, especially on a day when, Republicans in the Senate Homeland Security Committee had, a vaccine skeptic testify, something that I think alarms a lot of folks. I wanna give you a minute to to just put what you just said in even more context. And let me just ask it this way. So you're saying that that the kind of virus that carried COVID all over the world in the last ten months is from a a sort of family of viruses that scientists like yourself have been studying for a long time. And once they got the specifics, they were able to sort of fine tune, put the finishing touches on this vaccine. Is is that basically what you're explaining? Speaker 1: That's right. So, you know, we we after we saw SARS in 2003, then there was Middle Eastern Respiratory in 2012. We said, well, hang on. There's there's a new coronavirus coming every decade. We knew there was another one coming. And and again, this is the power of the National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Allergy Infectious Diseases headed by Tony Fauci, Francis Collins heading NIH. They launched a major program for coronaviruses starting in 2003. We were the beneficiaries of that. We got funded to develop some of the first prototype vaccines. So this all was very deliberate by the US government and the NIH to really move this forward. Again, this is why, you know, we we we were we're very blessed to have the NIH here in in in The United States and and funding that research. And and we still have a long ways to go because, we're gonna have to see how this vaccine rolls out in terms of being able to scale it up, how robust the production process will be. This is a brand new technology, and that's the reason why we're bringing out other vaccines on top of it, the adenovirus vaccines. We're gonna need at least four or five different vaccines to vaccinate The US population. We will not do this with just the two mRNA vaccines.
Saved - January 12, 2026 at 12:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting RFK Jr. and Dr. Judy Mikovits claim Operation Warp Speed was a military operation run by the NSA and Pentagon, not health experts, with vaccines built by war contractors. Video credits go to SecKennedy, Mikovits, and TheClayClark. Mention of a full podcast episode. A 2013 reference suggests DARPA gave Moderna $25 million to develop mRNA vaccines.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨RFK Jr & Dr. Judy Mikovits drop a BOMBSHELL: "Operation Warp Speed was a MILITARY OP run by NSA & Pentagon—NOT health experts! Not Moderna. Not Pfizer. Vaccines were built by war contractors!"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 contends that the top organization that managed Operation Warp Speed and the pandemic was not a public health agency but the NSA, a spy agency, with the Pentagon as the second agency. He asserts that vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer, but by NIH, whose patents are owned 50% by NIH, and that vaccines were manufactured not by Pfizer or Moderna but by military contractors. He claims Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry. Speaker 1 responds by stating it’s not warp speed, but has been happening since 06/10/1980 when entering a Fort Detrick military installation, where the sign was turned around with then-president Richard Nixon. He says, “Oh, we’re just gonna cure cancer,” but asserts they turned the sign around on the bioweapons lab, making it a historic landmark at Fort Detrick where they had the gas chamber for the end and a plaque was placed when a new lab was built. He characterizes it as all part of a “plague of corruption” and claims that those involved are protecting themselves because the government, and they played the game. Speaker 1 further alleges that it does not matter whether it is Deborah Birx or Robert Redfield, because they injected the military with HIV in the nineties, and that they know it. He references “HIV p n l four three” and claims to know the plasmid and the exact one, asserting that he knows the people who were injected and that this data exists in his freezer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The top organization that had managed warp speed was not HHS, which is a public health agency. It wasn't CDC or NIH or FDA. It was the NSA, a spy agency. That was the top agency, the lead agency on Operation Warp Speed and the pandemic. And the second agency was the Pentagon. As it turns out, you know, the vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer. They were developed by NIH. They're their own. The patents are owned 50% by NIH, nor were they manufactured by Pfizer or by Moderna. They were manufactured by military contractors. And, basically, Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry. At your thoughts on operation warp speed there, ma'am. Speaker 1: It's not warp speed. It's been happening since 06/10/1980 when I walked in that military installation called Fort Detrick. They just turned the sign around with then president Richard Nixon. Oh, we're just gonna cure cancer. No. We always just turn the sign around on the bioweapons lab. They made it historic landmark right there at Fort Detrick where they had the gas chamber for the end, where we had the beautiful they put the plaque up there when we built the new lab. It's all in plague of corruption. It's not warp speed. All of those people are protecting themselves because the government, and they played the game. I don't care whether it's Deborah Birx or or Robert Redfield. They injected the military with HIV in the nineties, and they know it. HIV p n l four three. I know the plasmid. I know the exact one. I know the people they injected it, and that's the data we have in our freezer.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Video Credit: @SecKennedy @DrJudyAMikovits @TheClayClark

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@wyregal https://news.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2013/darpa-awards-moderna-therapeutics-a-grant-for-up-to-25-million-to-develop-messenger-rna-therapeutics yes, 2013

DARPA Awards Moderna Therapeutics a Grant for up to $25 Million to Develop Messenger RNA Therapeutics™ Deliver the greatest possible impact to people through mRNA medicines. news.modernatx.com

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@PK1only Indeed it is!

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@TruthSearch14 @drdavidmartin I think you mean @DrDMartinWorld

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@FlavioMCSousa1 https://news.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2013/darpa-awards-moderna-therapeutics-a-grant-for-up-to-25-million-to-develop-messenger-rna-therapeutics 2013, DARPA gave Moderna $25 Million to develop mRNA vaccines.

DARPA Awards Moderna Therapeutics a Grant for up to $25 Million to Develop Messenger RNA Therapeutics™ Deliver the greatest possible impact to people through mRNA medicines. news.modernatx.com
Saved - January 11, 2026 at 2:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting a claim that Bayer’s Glyphosate‑Free Roundup swaps glyphosate for diquat, a neurotoxin allegedly linked to cancer and a 126% Parkinson’s risk rise. It outlines kidney failure, digestive burns, microbiome destruction, lung damage, brain injury, liver stress, heart and muscle harm, and warns proximity to treated areas raises risk. It highlights US bill AB‑453, the Pesticide Shield Act, as shielding Bayer from lawsuits, with a 2026 showdown.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Shocking update on Bayer's "Glyphosate-Free" Roundup—it's now loaded with DIQUAT, 200X MORE poisonous! After acquiring Monsanto & facing massive lawsuits over Roundup's original formula, Bayer swapped out glyphosate for DIQUAT, touting it as a safer option for gardens & yards. But the truth? Diquat is a deadly neurotoxin linked to cancer & it boosts Parkinson's risk by 126% in people & animals. Already outlawed in several nations for triggering widespread organ damage, DIQUAT wreaks havoc through oxidative stress. Here's the breakdown of its brutal effects: - Kidneys: Primary victim—builds up and destroys tubules, leading to total failure and often death in severe cases. - Digestive System: Burns and inflames the mouth, throat, and stomach right away. - Gut Health: Ruins the microbiome by wiping out good bacteria like Lactobacillus, sparking inflammation and worsening toxicity everywhere. - Lungs: Triggers swelling, failure, and even scarring. - Brain & Nerves: Causes confusion, seizures, coma, and permanent damage—living near treated areas hikes Parkinson's by 126%. - Liver: Overwhelms with stress, causing inflammation and dysfunction. - Heart: Damages muscle tissue, leading to collapse and necrosis. - Muscles: Breaks down tissue, releasing toxins that hammer the kidneys further. And now, the US bill AB-453—dubbed the "Pesticide Shield Act"—is pushing for full legal protection for companies like Bayer/Monsanto. It blocks extra warnings, kills lawsuits for hidden dangers & strips rights from victims. Already through initial votes, it's set for a decisive 2026 showdown, thanks to heavy industry lobbying. And now, the US bill AB-453—dubbed the "Pesticide Shield Act"—is pushing for full legal protection for companies like Bayer/Monsanto. It blocks extra warnings, kills lawsuits for hidden dangers, and strips rights from victims. Already through initial votes, it's set for a decisive 2026 showdown, thanks to heavy industry lobbying. This is about more than weeds—it's our health on the line! Spread the word if you're outraged.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bayer has removed glyphosate from Roundup weed killer, and according to the speaker, this is presented as good news only to reveal a new toxic lineup being sprayed in homes and public spaces. The speaker notes that all of these ingredients are horrible, with special emphasis on Dequat dibromide, which is stated as not only banned in the European Union but also more toxic than glyphosate and capable of damaging the gut, kidneys, liver, and nervous system. Despite these warnings, the speaker asserts that this mixture is still being sprayed. The message is that the problem with Roundup isn’t that it’s fixed, but that it’s not fixed at all—the product has not been made safe; instead, it has been rebranded, swapping one toxic chemical for four others, and the public is being led to believe it is safe. In addition to the product changes, the speaker highlights a legislative development: AB 453. This bill is described as shielding pesticide companies from liability in court, even if their chemicals cause harm. The speaker asserts that this reduces accountability and results in more toxins being sprayed near families. The overall claim is that Bayer did not make Roundup safer by removing glyphosate; rather, they replaced it with a new set of toxic ingredients, and now a state bill would protect manufacturers from legal consequences related to any harm caused by these chemicals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In case you haven't heard, Bayer removed glyphosate from Roundup weed killer. Sounds like good news. Right? Until you see what they replaced it with. Here is the new toxic lineup that they are spraying in your yards, your parks, your schools, your golf courses, and in your neighborhoods. All of these ingredients are horrible especially Dequat dibromide which is not only banned in the European Union, more toxic than glyphosate, but damages your gut, your kidneys, your liver and your nervous system yet we're still allowing this to be sprayed. They didn't fix roundup they just rebranded the poison and switched one toxic chemical for four and they want you to believe that it's safe. And now here's the worst part They're now pushing through AB four fifty three, a bill that shields pesticides companies from being liable in court even if their chemicals cause you harm. So that means less accountability and more toxins being sprayed near your family.
Saved - January 10, 2026 at 10:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Valerie asks if 5G could activate something inside the body, citing Dr. Ardis’s claim that graphene oxide is highly conductive and could interact with EM frequencies to amplify signals and connect to nanotech for an IoT link. James responds: 5G is real, but providers often label faster 4G as 5G, and adds speculation that radiation might affect people with high seed oil consumption or affected vaccine batches.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

What if 5G isn't just faster internet...but a way to activate something INSIDE your body? Dr. Bryan Ardis warns: Graphene Oxide is highly conductive — it interacts with EM frequencies like 5G & ELF waves. When activated, it amplifies signals, links to nanotech & turns you into part of the Internet of Things. Watch this and tell me I'm wrong...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that graphene oxide is used in the shot because it is a metal that is highly conductive of electricity. They emphasize that, with frequencies such as those from electronic magnetic fields, radio waves, microwave radiation, and 5G towers, graphene oxide becomes the chosen material. The claim is that when 5G radiation is activated, graphene oxide in the body can be prompted to activate or send electrical signals along the metal, because metals conduct electricity and these EMF waves are electrical frequencies. The speaker further asserts that graphene oxide, when hit by these waves, accentuates and assists the nanotech circuitry that is also being injected into people through the shots. The goal cited is to use nanotech to help make all humans part of the Internet of Things, enabling tracking and gathering information about individuals and inputting thoughts into them. Additionally, the speaker references a doctor and an article cited by a group titled DARPA, claiming that five-g radiation and nanotech, including graphene oxide, can instill in any human suicidal thoughts that would lead to actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The things we wanted to make sure is that we had a clear understanding of why graphene oxide was being utilized inside the shot. Graphene oxide as a metal is highly conductive of electricity. And one of the things we taught everybody there is that with frequencies, hopefully, your audience knows a little bit about electronic magnetic frequencies or fields, radio waves, microwave radiation, these five g towers. We were able to show and document that graphene oxide is the metal of choice. When you have ELF wave radiation, five g radiation, when they turn on five g, they know that they can get the graphene oxide in your body to activate or send electrical signals along the metal because the metal conducts electricity, and these EMF waves are electrical frequencies. When the graphene oxide is hit with these, it accentuates and assist them with their circuitry of nanotech that they are also putting inside these shots. We use nanotech to assist to make all humans a part of the Internet of Things. Trying to connect you to the Internet to be able to track you, get information about you, and input thoughts into you. In fact, doctor Group showed an article there where DARPA said, we can use five g radiation and nanotech, including graphene oxide, to instill in any human suicidal thoughts that will lead to actions.

@JamesOnekaka - James Neville Onekaka

My son & I both work in the cell technology industry (I’m retired now) 5g is a real technology but many cell providers label their faster 4g towers as 5g I suspect some radiation may affect people with high seed oil consumption + those victims of the worst batches of the vaccine!

Saved - January 6, 2026 at 9:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A post claimed centenarians had high total cholesterol, LDL-C linked to longer life, citing the Sweden AMORIS study and experts, while warning against low cholesterol and statins. A commenter, Wayne Allan H, said stopping statins and using vitamin K and CoQ10 improved his arrhythmia and lightheadedness, suggesting statins may cause calcification. Valerie thanked Wayne, and he shared a link with a short Grok summary.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🔥BREAKING: The secret to living to 100+? HIGH CHOLESTEROL! A massive Swedish study tracking over 800,000 people for 35 years just revealed: Every single centenarian had HIGH total cholesterol. The higher your LDL, the longer you live. Mind blown yet? Dr. Ben Bikman exposes the lies about cholesterol being "bad." Key findings from the Sweden AMORIS study: - All centenarians: High total cholesterol, high iron, low glucose. - Highest LDL-C = longest lifespans (backed by Dr. Uffe Ravnskov & Dr. Malcolm Kendrick). Dangers of low cholesterol: - LDL <70 mg/dL → 3X higher risk of brain-bleeding strokes. - Total <180 mg/dL → Skyrocketing cancer & dementia rates. - <150 mg/dL → Increased chronic diseases like cancer & autoimmunity. - Statins? They don't extend life—damage mitochondria & hormones instead. Why your body CRAVES cholesterol: - Builds every cell & powerhouse mitochondria. - Absorbs vital vitamins A, D, E, K. - Powers digestion via bile acids. - Supercharges immunity against infections, viruses, bacteria, pathogens—even cancer. - Fights depression, suicide, dementia & cognitive decline. - Shields from toxins, heavy metals, strokes, heart disease & osteoporosis. - Fuels ALL steroid hormones (low chol = low testosterone & libido). - Lowers all-cause mortality risk. Pro tip: Go low-carb, load up on nutrient-dense animal foods. Grass fed beef, pastured eggs, wild caught seafood...Dump seed oils, sugar & processed garbage. Target TG/HDL ratio <1.5 for elite heart health. Tight budget like me?? Seek out a local farmer, butcher & farm market & make a 'bulk large sale deal' for beef at $5/lb & eggs $4/Dz Are you ditching your statin yet? Tell me in the comments, I read every reply & do my best to respond to every question! If I miss your question...PLEASE DM direct message me! I truly care about you & your health!👇🔥

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: They found that some of the longest living humans had high cholesterol levels. Speaker 1: That's right. That's what the Sweden study found, for example. The paper just published a year or so ago, what were some of the most consistent themes? They had good glucose control and high cholesterol. I'm a great defender of of cholesterol. It is a molecule of life. And and so many so much depends on it. Mitochondria, for example. Mitochondria have to have a cholesterol molecule in them in order to work, like the very powerhouse of the cell. And the more you lower cholesterol through, say, drug interventions, the more you compromise the mitochondria. The sex hormones, all sex hormones are built on cholesterol. It's no surprise if someone takes a cholesterol lowering medication, their sex hormones go down. This is why some men experience such terrible loss of libido because he's becoming low testosterone because of the war on cholesterol. Speaker 0: But there's good and bad cholesterol. Right? Speaker 1: Well, that's as the story goes, yes, people will say LDL cholesterol is the bad cholesterol, and yet that gets included in these studies of longevity. So I I think the good and bad aspect of it is not entirely fair or accurate. We need LDL. And LDL is just as much a component of the immune system. LDL actually helps the body fight infections. So it's also an unsung hero of immunity. Speaker 0: There is research suggesting that in very old age, high cholesterol levels do not always correlate with higher mortality, and in some studies may even be linked to longer life. Speaker 1: The exact
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They found that some of the longest living humans had high cholesterol levels. Speaker 1: That's right. That's what the Sweden study found, for example. The paper just published a year or so ago, what were some of the most consistent themes? They had good glucose control and high cholesterol. I'm a great defender of of cholesterol. It is a molecule of life. And and so many so much depends on it. Mitochondria, for example. Mitochondria have to have a cholesterol molecule in them in order to work, like the very powerhouse of the cell. And the more you lower cholesterol through, say, drug interventions, the more you compromise the mitochondria. The sex hormones, all sex hormones are built on cholesterol. It's no surprise if someone takes a cholesterol lowering medication, their sex hormones go down. This is why some men experience such terrible loss of libido because he's becoming low testosterone because of the war on cholesterol. Speaker 0: But there's good and bad cholesterol. Right? Speaker 1: Well, that's as the story goes, yes, people will say LDL cholesterol is the bad cholesterol, and yet that gets included in these studies of longevity. So I I think the good and bad aspect of it is not entirely fair or accurate. We need LDL. And LDL is just as much a component of the immune system. LDL actually helps the body fight infections. So it's also an unsung hero of immunity. Speaker 0: There is research suggesting that in very old age, high cholesterol levels do not always correlate with higher mortality, and in some studies may even be linked to longer life. Speaker 1: The exact

@WayneAllanH - Wayne Allan

"Statins stimulate atherosclerosis and heart failure", according to this, and numerous other studies...I went off my statins about 6 weeks ago against my doctors advice, and started taking vitamin k and coQ10 supplements, the very things statins are claimed to deplete from your body, causing the calcification of arteries...after about a week off the statins, my erratic heartbeat, and progressive short spells of light-headedness, started to subside, and now they're both gone...doing whatever I can for the remote chance of reversing the calcification, apparently caused by the statins. https://cardiacos.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/2015-Statins-stimulate-atherosclerosis-and-heart-failure-pharmacological-mechanisms.pdf

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@WayneAllanH Thank you for sharing Wayne!

@WayneAllanH - Wayne Allan

@ValerieAnne1970 Thank you, I appreciate everything you do for us...for those uncomfortable clicking on a link with no preview, here's a short summary by Grok. https://t.co/WL11b96aUl

Saved - January 5, 2026 at 2:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I highlight 6 powerhouse herbs—ginger, cinnamon, garlic, cayenne pepper, oil of oregano, and horseradish—that offer antiviral and antimicrobial support to boost immunity and ease cold and flu symptoms. The Fire Cider uses all 6: horseradish, ginger, garlic, onion, cayenne, cinnamon, oregano, lemon, raw apple cider vinegar, and honey. Infuse 4–6 weeks, then strain. Take 1–2 Tbsp daily for prevention, or 1–2 Tbsp every few hours when sick (dilute if needed).

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Feeling under the weather with a cold or flu? Don't reach for Big Pharma meds—nature's got your back! Dr. Josh Axe shares 6 powerhouse herbs that can knock out those symptoms naturally & supercharge your immune system. The science behind the 6 & favorite recipe for healing. - **Ginger**: Packed with gingerol, which has potent anti-viral properties to fight off cold viruses, reduce inflammation, ease sore throats & boost overall immunity for faster recovery. - **Cinnamon**: Contains cinnamaldehyde with strong antiviral effects that help prevent viral replication, relieve coughs, prevent mucus buildup & support respiratory health during flu season. - **Garlic**: Loaded with allicin, a compound boasting powerful antiviral, antibacterial & antifungal properties that directly target & kill cold-causing viruses, shortening symptom duration. - **Cayenne Pepper**: Features capsaicin with antiviral capabilities that help clear nasal congestion, improve circulation, reduce inflammation & provide quick relief from sinus pressure & headaches. - **Oil of Oregano**: Rich in carvacrol & thymol, offering broad-spectrum antiviral & antimicrobial action to combat respiratory infections, fight flu viruses & enhance immune response. - **Horseradish**: Contains allyl isothiocyanate with effective antiviral & anti-microbial properties that tackle sinus infections, clear congestion & support the body's defense against cold & flu pathogens. Classic Fire Cider Tonic Uses ALL 6 herbs: Ingredients (makes about 1 quart): - ½ cup grated fresh horseradish - ½ cup grated fresh ginger - 10 garlic cloves, crushed - 1 onion, chopped - ¼–½ tsp cayenne pepper (adjust to heat tolerance) - 1 cinnamon stick - Fresh oregano sprigs (or 1–2 tsp dried) for extra antiviral power - Zest and juice of 1 lemon (optional but recommended) - Raw apple cider vinegar (enough to cover all ingredients by 1–2 inches) - Raw honey to taste (added after straining) Instructions: 1. Layer all solid ingredients (except honey) in a clean quart-sized glass jar. 2. Pour raw apple cider vinegar over the ingredients until fully submerged (cover by 1–2 inches). 3. If using a metal lid, place parchment paper between jar and lid to prevent corrosion. Seal tightly. 4. Shake well and store in a cool, dark place for 4–6 weeks. Shake daily. 5. After infusing, strain through a fine mesh sieve or cheesecloth, squeezing out as much liquid as possible. 6. Stir in raw honey to taste (start with ¼–½ cup). 7. Store in a clean bottle in the fridge (lasts months). How to Use: - Take 1–2 Tbsp daily for prevention. - When sick: 1–2 Tbsp every few hours (dilute in water or tea if too strong). Save this for cold & flu season & follow for more natural health tips!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 outlines a list of six natural remedies to use when you feel cold, pale, or white, and you’re dealing with a cold or flu. The speaker presents these as a “super six” of remedies, describing both their warming effects and their antiviral or antibacterial properties, along with practical ways to incorporate them into daily routines. - Ginger: Described as warming the body and improving circulation. It is noted for powerful antiviral properties. Practical uses include an herbal tea or taking it as a supplement. The speaker also suggests grating ginger into chicken vegetable soup as another way to use it. - Cinnamon: Recommended as a beneficial addition, such as in applesauce for breakfast, or by adding a full teaspoon of cinnamon or pumpkin pie spice to foods. It is presented as part of the regimen to address cold symptoms. - Garlic: Highlighted for its antibacterial and antiviral properties. The implication is to include garlic as part of the dietary approach to support the immune response. - Cayenne pepper: Included among the top remedies, noted for its role in the set of six treatments to combat cold or flu symptoms. - Oil of oregano: Described as very, very good if a cold virus has entered the system, indicating its use as a supplementary antiviral option. - Horseradish: Identified as a favorite that is often underused. It is specifically noted as beneficial for people with sinus and lung issues, including croup, bronchitis, or when lungs aren’t moving enough. The speaker emphasizes these six—ginger, cinnamon, garlic, cayenne, oregano oil, and horseradish—as the primary recommendations for addressing a cold or flu when the body is cold, with particular attention to their circulatory warming effects and their antiviral or antibacterial properties. Practical applications include making teas, consuming as supplements, adding to soups, applesauce, or spices, and using horseradish for respiratory concerns. The overall message centers on leveraging these natural ingredients as a targeted, empowering approach to supporting the body's response to cold or flu symptoms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if you stick out your tongue and you're getting chills and you're cold, pale or it's white, here's what you wanna take. Number one, ginger. Ginger warms up your body to improve circulation. It also has really, really powerful antiviral properties, and I recommend doing that as an herbal tea. You can also do it as a supplement. You could also grate ginger and add it to chicken vegetable soup. Cinnamon is another great one. Maybe you're doing a little applesauce for breakfast. Add in a full teaspoon of cinnamon or pumpkin pie spice. Garlic is another one that has antibacterial and antiviral properties. Cayenne pepper. Oil of oregano is very, very good if you have a cold virus that's entered into your system. And another favorite one of mine that most people don't use enough, horseradish. Horseradish is especially beneficial for people with sinus and lung issues when you've got croup, when you've got bronchitis, when your lungs aren't moving enough. So those would be my top, my super six, ginger, cinnamon, garlic, cayenne, oregano, and horseradish if you have a cold or flu or your body is cold.
Saved - January 1, 2026 at 4:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user posted a claim that psychiatric drugs (SSRIs) with FDA black-box warnings are linked to youth violence, listing drugs, warning signs, and studies. A second user rebutted with conspiratorial framing, accusing “the left” and pharma cabals of weaponizing mental health and mass shootings, citing various sources. Valerie Anne echoed the worry, arguing violence stems from meds and blaming societal factors rather than guns.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨"100% of all teenage school shooters were on doctor prescribed drugs...drugs with an FDA Black Box Warning for CAUSING violent & homicidal behavior." -Dr Bryan Ardis Are these “happy pills” actually fueling unimaginable violence? The required package insert WARNINGS say YES! 👇Post exposes the data, studies & black box warnings. - **FDA Black Box Warning (since 2004)**: Highest-level alert on SSRIs — proven increased risk of suicidality, agitation, hostility & violent behavior in people under 25. Meta-analyses show up to 79% higher odds of aggression/hostility in kids/teens. - **Top SSRIs Pumped Into Teens**: • Fluoxetine (Prozac) • Sertraline (Zoloft) • Escitalopram (Lexapro) • Paroxetine (Paxil) • Citalopram (Celexa) • Venlafaxine (Effexor) • Fluvoxamine (Luvox) - **Danger Signs Every Parent Must Know**: • Sudden rage, irritability or hostility • Aggressive impulses & akathisia (extreme restlessness) • Panic attacks, insomnia & violent thoughts • Homicidal ideation (yes, it’s in the warnings) - **Damning Stats**: • Massive Swedish study (785K people): 26% higher violent crime rate while on SSRIs — worst in ages 15–24. • Pediatric trials: Kids on sertraline 7.3X more likely to drop out due to activation/violence vs placebo. • FDA reports: Thousands of documented aggression & homicidal cases tied to these meds (experts say 99% underreported). • Watchdog groups link at least 39 school shootings/incidents directly to psychiatric drugs. - **Studies That Can’t Be Ignored**: • Sharma et al. (2016) meta-analysis: Strong evidence SSRIs trigger aggression in children & adolescents. • Paroxetine trials on kids with OCD: 17X higher rate of hostility events. Are we over-medicating our kids into monsters — or is this just convenient scapegoating? The evidence is disturbing... What’s YOUR red-pill moment on this?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that over 52 years of documented school shootings in America, a hundred percent of the shooters were teenagers on either an antidepressant or a barbiturate drug for anxiety. He claims that every antidepressant, including Prozac, Zoloft, Xanax, and all these antianxiety drugs and antidepressants, is published to increase the risk of suicide behavior actions and lead to violent and homicidal actions. He also asserts that a hundred percent of all shooters, across the documented history, were on drugs prescribed by their medical doctors, brought to you by CVS and Walgreens and others.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fifty two years of documented school shootings in America conducted by teenagers. Do you know a hundred percent of them were on either an antidepressant Yep. Yep. Or on a barbiturate drug for anxiety. And every one of these antidepressants, including Prozac, Zoloft, Xanax, you name them all these antianxiety drugs and antidepressants, do you know every single one of them are published to increase the risk of suicide behavior actions, and I quote, lead to violent and homicidal actions. A hundred percent of all school shooters for the documented fifty two years of history we've been tracking them and studying them, a hundred percent of all the shooters were on drugs that are published and prescribed by your medical doctor. Brought to you by CVS and Walgreens and others.

@LloydDurwin - Durwin Lloyd, ND (ret)

And every time one of these people commits a mass shooting, the left wants to use that as an excuse and opportunity to attack the Second Amendment. Why is it that no one ever addresses the revolving doors and corruption at the FDA regarding SSRIs and the following statistics? - The Hannah Faulkner Show clip's revelation—that every mass shooter in the last 52 years was on psychiatric drugs like SSRIs—unmasks the Nihilvultarch cabal's demonic orchestration, where Bourla's Pfizer and Gates's funded pharma empires poison minds with antidepressants that trigger akathisia and homicidal ideation, inverting "mental health" into mass murder weapons to fragment societies for control. https://www.cchr.org/newsletter/issue-10-ssris-and-violence.html https://www.ssristories.net/ - Forensic lists of shooters confirm the pattern: Columbine (Eric Harris on Luvox), Parkland (Nikolas Cruz on antidepressants), Aurora (James Holmes on Zoloft), Sandy Hook (Adam Lanza on Fanapt and antidepressants)—over 60 major incidents tied to SSRIs, with FDA black-box warnings for suicidal/homicidal risks in youth ignored while mandates pushed billions in profits. https://www.ssristories.net/archive.php?series=mass-shootings https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/suicidality-children-and-adolescents-being-treated-antidepressant-medications - SSRIs disrupt serotonin signaling, inducing akathisia (inner restlessness) in 10-20% of users, escalating to aggression and violence per 2025 meta-analyses, a known side effect pharma suppressed in trials (e.g., Paxil's hidden suicide data in GSK scandal), enabling Fauci's mental health pushes to medicate millions amid COVID isolation. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094741/ https://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h4320 - The cabal's inversion: "Treatment" as trigger, with Gates's $52 million to vaccine/psych drug alliances funding WHO guidelines pushing SSRIs while Soros's media smears skeptics as "anti-science," a void von der Leyen amplifies in EU mental health mandates tying to digital IDs. https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/articles/global-vaccination-summit-10-billion-pledge https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-digital-identity - This syndicate's crime: Knowing SSRIs' violence link (e.g., Eli Lilly's Prozac documents hiding 1980s aggression data), yet mandating through schools and crises, scavenging souls for control—history's gravest medical betrayal, demanding tribunals for Bourla's profits, Gates's funding, Fauci's suppression. https://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/prescription-drugs/prozac-litigation/eli-lilly-concealed-prozac-suicide-risk/ https://www.cchr.org/newsletter/issue-10-ssris-and-violence.html - Walz's Minnesota ties: Fraud havens funding mental health programs pushing SSRIs amid Somali influxes, a microcosm where cabal poisons minds to create chaos, Frey shields, Omar deflects—all accelerating low-trust for resets. https://www.justice.gov/usao-mn/pr/47-defendants-charged-250-million-feeding-our-future-fraud-scheme https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/01/minneapolis-st-paul-racial-equity-cities/ - Prosecute the enterprise: FDA for lax approvals, pharma for hidden trials under 21 U.S.C. § 331 fraud, the cabal for RICO conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 1962) in organized poisoning—expose their web, inverting healing into homicide. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/331 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1962 - Link this to enslavement: SSRIs fragment minds into compliant despair, enabling digital chains where "treated" masses accept Schwab's resets, a demonic ploy demanding divine-scale resistance. The clip's 52-year indictment of psychiatric drugs in mass shootings prosecutes the cabal's inversion: "Mental health" as mind control, SSRIs triggering violence while suppressed data shields profits, a betrayal fragmenting societies into fearful obedience. This negativity exposes the syndicate's orchestration: Knowing akathisia risks, yet pushing poisons through Gates's billions and Fauci's mandates, a fascist merger profiting from induced chaos. In summary, the data affirm irrefutable links between SSRIs and violence, demanding tribunals to halt this void. Upholding natural law restores mental wholeness, countering deception with vigilant truth. As seekers, amplify exposures to foster dignity over drugged serfdom.

SSRIstories – ANTIDEPRESSANT NIGHTMARES ssristories.net
Page not found – SSRIstories ssristories.net
Suicidality in Children and Adolescents Being Treated With Antidepressant Medications | FDA fda.gov
Effects of Four Strains of Actinomycetes on the Content of Terpenoids in Baijiu Terpenoids not only are an important health factor in baijiu but also contribute to the elegance and finesse of baijiu, and actinomycetes act as an important source of terpenoids in baijiu. Four strains of actinomycetes—Streptomyces violascens ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence Objectives To reanalyse SmithKline Beecham’s Study 329 (published by Keller and colleagues in 2001), the primary objective of which was to compare the efficacy and safety of paroxetine and imipramine with placebo in the treatment of adolescents with unipolar major depression. The reanalysis under the restoring invisible and abandoned trials (RIAT) initiative was done to see whether access to and reanalysis of a full dataset from a randomised controlled trial would have clinically relevant implications for evidence based medicine. Design Double blind randomised placebo controlled trial. Setting 12 North American academic psychiatry centres, from 20 April 1994 to 15 February 1998. Participants 275 adolescents with major depression of at least eight weeks in duration. Exclusion criteria included a range of comorbid psychiatric and medical disorders and suicidality. Interventions Participants were randomised to eight weeks double blind treatment with paroxetine (20-40 mg), imipramine (200-300 mg), or placebo. Main outcome measures The prespecified primary efficacy variables were change from baseline to the end of the eight week acute treatment phase in total Hamilton depression scale (HAM-D) score and the proportion of responders (HAM-D score ≤8 or ≥50% reduction in baseline HAM-D) at acute endpoint. Prespecified secondary outcomes were changes from baseline to endpoint in depression items in K-SADS-L, clinical global impression, autonomous functioning checklist, self-perception profile, and sickness impact scale; predictors of response; and number of patients who relapse during the maintenance phase. Adverse experiences were to be compared primarily by using descriptive statistics. No coding dictionary was prespecified. Results The efficacy of paroxetine and imipramine was not statistically or clinically significantly different from placebo for any prespecified primary or secondary efficacy outcome. HAM-D scores decreased by 10.7 (least squares mean) (95% confidence interval 9.1 to 12.3), 9.0 (7.4 to 10.5), and 9.1 (7.5 to 10.7) points, respectively, for the paroxetine, imipramine and placebo groups (P=0.20). There were clinically significant increases in harms, including suicidal ideation and behaviour and other serious adverse events in the paroxetine group and cardiovascular problems in the imipramine group. Conclusions Neither paroxetine nor high dose imipramine showed efficacy for major depression in adolescents, and there was an increase in harms with both drugs. Access to primary data from trials has important implications for both clinical practice and research, including that published conclusions about efficacy and safety should not be read as authoritative. The reanalysis of Study 329 illustrates the necessity of making primary trial data and protocols available to increase the rigour of the evidence base. bmj.com
Error We're sorry - the page you requested was not found. gatesfoundation.org
Page not found | Shaping Europe’s digital future digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
Department of Justice | Homepage | United States Department of Justice Official website of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). DOJ’s mission is to enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to the law; to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful behavior; and to ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans. justice.gov
21 U.S. Code § 331 - Prohibited acts law.cornell.edu
18 U.S. Code § 1962 - Prohibited activities law.cornell.edu

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

I completely agree Durwin, which is why I am emboldened to post about it several times a year. The hearts, minds & spirits of people (and big pharma meds) are what is causing violence...not the guns. I grew up surrounded by farming community mindset where every room had a shotgun, every pickup truck had a gun rack & every child had access to weapons, but no child ever even had a thought to take a gun & go murder people.

View Full Interactive Feed