TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ValerieAnne1970

Saved - March 8, 2026 at 2:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe cholesterol is essential in every cell and life itself; without enough, cells die. Healthy cholesterol supports brain function, hormones, muscles, bones, lungs, digestion, immunity, mood, and protection from toxins. A low-carb diet emphasizing nutrient-dense animal foods, avoiding seed oils and excess sugar, creates a favorable TG/HDL ratio—ideally under 1.5—and is claimed to yield zero CVD risk.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"The Most Dangerous Idea In Human History Is This Idea that Cholesterol Causes Heart Attacks." – Dr. Cate Shanahan, MD It Was Not True. It Was Never True. It Was Never Proven, Yet It Was Accepted As Fact. Cholesterol is in every one of our cells. It is essential to life, to animal life. All animals, not just humans, every form of animal must have cholesterol in our cell membrane. If The Cell Doesn't Have Enough, It Dies. Low Cholesterol Is Deadly & Dangerous. Healthy Cholesterol Is Crucial For A Thriving Life. Top 15 Cholesterol Benefits: • Prevents dementia & cognitive decline • Protects against all cause mortality • Production of all steroid hormones • Necessary for muscles & bone density • Protective against stroke & heart disease • Important for lungs & airways • Building block of all cells & mitochondria • Absorption of Vitamins A, D, E & K • Critical for digestion & bile acids • Immune system protection against infections • Lowers risk of cancer & death • Lowers risk of depression & suicide • Lowers stress, cortisol & anxiety • Protects against chemicals, toxins & heavy metals • Optimal brain is 60% fat & 25% cholesterol A low carbohydrate diet prioritizing nutrient dense animal foods, eliminating harmful seed oils & excess sugar, provides the best healthy cholesterol profile. This approach keeps Triglycerides low & HDL high, which is one of the best biomarkers for Cardiac health. TG/HDL ratio optimally should be less than 1.5 for zero CVD risk.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The most dangerous idea in human history is this idea that cholesterol causes heart attacks. It was not true. It was never true. It was never proven. Yet, it was accepted as fact. It's ridiculous when you think about it because cholesterol is something nature puts in every single one of our cells. It is essential to life, to animal life. All animals, not just humans, every form of animal must have cholesterol in our cell membrane. And if the cell doesn't have enough, it die. Speaker 1: Humans have survived an awful long time eating animal fats. So all of a sudden, the powers that be tell us they're literally off the table, and we followed suit thinking that these people know what they're talking about, and we were really off base.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The most dangerous idea in human history is this idea that cholesterol causes heart attacks. It was not true. It was never true. It was never proven. Yet, it was accepted as fact. It's ridiculous when you think about it because cholesterol is something nature puts in every single one of our cells. It is essential to life, to animal life. All animals, not just humans, every form of animal must have cholesterol in our cell membrane. And if the cell doesn't have enough, it die. Speaker 1: Humans have survived an awful long time eating animal fats. So all of a sudden, the powers that be tell us they're literally off the table, and we followed suit thinking that these people know what they're talking about, and we were really off base.
Saved - March 6, 2026 at 4:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Gibson says he couldn’t walk for three months after taking Remdesivir for COVID and questions Fauci. He claims Remdesivir is lethal, nicknamed “Run Death Is Near” for killing thousands in hospitals, and that it harms kidney, liver, and heart. He notes his gardener died after the same treatment and says, “We both got Remdesivir, which is not good.”

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Mel Gibson reveals he “couldn’t walk for three months” after taking Fauci’s drug for COVID. “Remdesivir kills you. I found that afterward. And that’s why I wonder about Fauci.” “Remdesivir is so lethal it got nicknamed ‘Run Death Is Near’ after it started killing thousands of COVID patients in the hospital.” “The experts claimed that remdesivir would stop COVID; instead, it stopped kidney function, then blasted the liver, the heart & other organs.” Gibson’s gardener wasn’t as fortunate. After reportedly receiving the kidney-toxic treatment, he tragically passed away. “I knew the guy for 20 years, and we both went to the same hospital, and he died, and I didn’t,” Gibson lamented. “We both got Remdesivir, which is not good.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes contracting COVID from his gardener, noting that the gardener had it first and died, while he survived. He says, “I got COVID from my gardener, and he had it first, and then I got it. I was like, ah, did I grab the hose or what, you know, what was I don't know. But it was it was I knew the guy for twenty years, and we both went to the same hospital. And he died, and I didn't. Jesus.” He claims they both received remdesivir, saying, “I think we both got remdesivir, which is not good. Not good. Not good. Causes kidney failure. I know.” He adds that he couldn’t walk for three months after receiving that treatment and that, “I couldn't walk for three months after I had that stuff. Really? Because it kills you.” He says he learned afterward that remdesivir “kills you,” and he ties this to a question about Fauci: “and that's why I wonder about Fauci, you know.” Speaker 1 responds, suggesting that the audience should indeed “wonder about that guy,” and contrasts this with actions he describes as preventing people from obtaining monoclonal antibodies: “Oh, you should wonder about that guy. When meanwhile, they were trying to stop people from getting monoclonal antibodies.” He criticizes the restriction of monoclonal antibodies as “fucking insane” because it followed a push to promote vaccines for profit, stating, “They've restricted monoclonal antibodies, which is fucking insane because they wanted to promote that vaccine because they wanted a profit off of it, which brings us back again to evil.” He asserts, “Evil's real. It's real. Putting money over human lives is evil. I agree.” He adds that there is a temptation to pursue such income, calling it “a real thing,” and reaffirms, “and there's a there's a temptation to do it too, which is even more crazy. Yeah.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I got COVID from my gardener, and he had it first, and then I got it. I was like, ah, did I grab the hose or what, you know, what was I don't know. But it was it was I knew the guy for twenty years, and we both went to the same hospital. And he died, and I didn't. Jesus. I think we both got remdesivir, which is not good. Not good. Not good. Causes kidney failure. I know. I I couldn't walk for three months after I had that stuff. Really? Because it kills you. I found out afterwards it kills you, and that's why I wonder about Fauci, you know. Speaker 1: Oh, you should wonder about that guy. When meanwhile, they were trying to stop people from getting monoclonal antibodies. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. They've restricted monoclonal antibodies, which is fucking insane because they wanted to promote that vaccine because they wanted a profit off of it, which brings us back again to evil. Mhmm. Evil's real. It's real. Putting money over human lives is evil. I agree. It's a it's a real thing, and there's a there's a temptation to do it too, which is even more crazy. Yeah.
Saved - March 5, 2026 at 5:11 PM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

One of Professor Francis Boyle's last interviews before being found dead. He called the COVID shots 'franken-shot' Bioweapons. He called out Bill Gates as a depopulation Eugenicist. https://t.co/4yE16X9jCi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Gates is funding all this; he is a well known eugenicist and has publicly stated the human population has to be reduced. So if you put together the COVID-nineteen pandemic and the Franken shots, the estimate I've seen now is maybe twenty million are already dead. So as I think Gates and some of these other people see it, that's a good start. The World Economic Forum, those types of people, yes. Twenty million dead is a good start as they see it and put it back. Plus if you look at the demographics who died, it's primarily senior citizens. And that then is economically beneficial. It wipes out social security, pensions, Medicare at least in this country and things of that nature. So you no longer have to pay for these COVID-nineteen, have figures here but it is far more lethal the older you get. And it's literally wiping out senior citizen populations. Yes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sure, Bill Gates is funding all this. And he is a well known eugenicist and has publicly stated the human population has to be reduced. And so if you put together the COVID-nineteen pandemic and the Franken shots, the estimate I've seen now is maybe twenty million are already dead. So as I think Gates and some of these other people see it, that's a good start. The World Economic Forum, those types of people, yes. Twenty million dead is a good start as they see it and put it back. Plus if you look at the demographics who died, it's primarily senior citizens. And that then is economically beneficial. It wipes out social security, pensions, Medicare at least in this country and things of that nature. So you no longer have to pay for these COVID-nineteen, have figures here but it is far more lethal the older you get. And it's literally wiping out senior citizen populations. Yes.
Saved - March 5, 2026 at 4:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was fired after 31 years as an ER physician with no complaints, says Dr. Charles Hoffe. He claims COVID shots cause more side effects than any treatment in history and that the toxic spike protein reaches every part of the body.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"I was fired...after 31 years as an ER Physician & not one single complaint against me." ~Dr Charles Hoffe "These COVID shots have caused greater side effects than any other medical treatment in history. The toxic spike protein ends up in literally every part of your body." https://t.co/YKK5lFVZ6a

Saved - March 3, 2026 at 5:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that Zen Honeycutt found 100% of Girl Scout cookies contain glyphosate and 88% contain heavy metals (Arsenic, Lead, Mercury). Thin Mints: glyphosate 334x harmful; Peanut Butter Patties: highest metals, Lead and aluminum; 76% exceed Cadmium limits; 96% contain Lead. It’s framed as slow poisoning wrapped in nostalgia, with GSUSA profits of about $800M and a silent response.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Danger in the dough..."Girl Scout Cookies are 100% positive for Glyphosate at alarming levels. 100% positive for Heavy Metals including Aluminum, Arsenic, Cadmium, Mercury & Lead." ~Zen Honeycutt Here is what they found inside the legendary cookies: ~100% of Girl Scout cookies contain glyphosate. ~88% contain heavy metals: Arsenic, Lead & Mercury. ~Thin Mints glyphosate levels 334X what experts consider harmful. ~Peanut Butter Patties had the highest level of heavy metals with Lead & alarming levels of aluminum. ~76% of cookies exceeded Cadmium safety limits. ~96% contained Lead This is more than just "unhealthy." It is slow poisoning, wrapped in nostalgia & sold by children. The organization, Girl Scouts USA, generates nearly $800M in yearly profits from this. When presented with these test results, their response was silence.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that Girl Scout cookies are a problem. They tested 13 different types of cookies from 25 states, including California, Iowa, and one other state, and the results were published on momsacrossamerica.org. The tests reported 100% positive for glyphosate and 100% positive for heavy metals, at alarming levels. Over 88% of the cookies contained all five of the toxic metals tested: aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead. The speaker notes that some of these toxic metals can leave permanent lifetime damage. They claim that over 80% of the Girl Scout cookies had lead levels higher than what the EPA allows. They also state that the aluminum was up to 300 times higher than the exposure level people are supposed to be exposed to, with aluminum readings described as possibly being in the parts per million range (around 29 parts per million). The speaker suggests a possible source for the high aluminum levels, speculating that it could be related to geoengineering, since aluminum is sprayed to manipulate clouds to create rain, though they say further testing needs to be done on that hypothesis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Girl Scout cookies, it's a problem, Del. We tested 13 different types of cookies from 25 states. Those were, I believe it was California, Iowa, and one other states on our website, momsacrossamerica.org. They were 100% positive for glyphosate dell at alarming levels and 100% positive for heavy metals. Over 88% of them had all five of the toxic metals that we tested for, which is aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, mercury, lead. And these, some of these toxic metals, I mean pretty, almost all of them, can leave permanent lifetime damage. Since over 80% of the Girl Scout cookies had levels of lead that were higher than what the EPA allows. And the aluminum was anywhere up to 300 times higher than what, is supposed to be people are supposed to be exposed to. We do suspect that the aluminum, because it was such high levels, it was parts per million, like twenty twenty nine thousand parts per billion or so 29 parts per million. We're suspecting geoengineering because aluminum is sprayed through trying to manipulate the clouds to create rain. So we're not sure, but further testing needs to be done on that.
Saved - March 2, 2026 at 4:09 AM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

~Dr. David E. Martin, PhD..."You cannot PATENT something that is Naturally Occurring, therefore the only legal Patented Virus is MANUFACTURED." "If it is MANUFACTURED then that becomes a violation of BIOLOGICAL & CHEMICAL WEAPONS TREATIES." https://t.co/UvBAPVwj6D

Saved - March 1, 2026 at 1:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The article presents a dire and unified claim: bees are undergoing a genocide-like collapse that threatens global food security and human health. It argues that more than 50% of the world’s bee population died last year, and that bees are responsible for pollinating one third of the foods on human plates. The piece asserts this is not an accident or climate mishap but a deliberate, systemic destruction driven by contemporary farming practices and corporate interests. It contends that bees are vanishing in Europe, North America, and Asia alike, with a silent mainstream media and government that fail to warn the public or take effective action. Central causes are laid out in a multi-pronged critique. The article claims chemicals sprayed on fields destroy the nervous systems of pollinators, while wildflower meadows are paved over in favor of monoculture crops that offer little nutrition to bees. It charges modern farming with GMOs and a soil treatment regime that reduces the land’s living, medicinal capacity, treating soil as mere dirt. The piece frames these developments as part of a broader pattern designed to shift society toward dependence on processed foods and, eventually, medical interventions marketed as cures. In this framing, a world without healthy food becomes easier to control, as fresh produce grows scarce and expensive and people turn to processed products and pharmaceuticals. The article emphasizes that the crisis is not only ecological but existential for personal health and freedom. It asserts that real food is foundational to health, describing “Food Is Medicine” as more than a slogan. It suggests that the loss of bees threatens not only honey but the nourishment that underpins lasting health and resistance to sickness shaped by the current system. The author connects personal experience to the wider argument, recounting healing from illness by changing diet and praising nature’s remedies as guidance amid a perceived crisis. To counter the crisis, the article offers concrete, actionable steps. It advocates planting bee-friendly flowers such as lavender, borage, clover, and sunflowers; stopping toxic weed-and-feed products; supporting small organic farmers who avoid spraying crops; and engaging in backyard beekeeping. It invites readers to participate in protections for bees as a route to preserving the broader food system and personal health, arguing that the Bee Genocide can stop when enough people refuse to remain silent and actively protect nature. The conclusion emphasizes urgency: protecting bees is synonymous with protecting the food that heals and the freedom to choose nature over a system that profits from sickness.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

x.com/i/article/2027…

The Bee Genocide: Nature’s Warning We Can’t Ignore Anymore

The Bee Genocide: Nature’s Warning We Can’t Ignore Anymore “Did you know over 50% of the Bees in the World died last year?” “Bees are responsible for one third of our Food Sources.” “It’s not an accident...it’s a Bee Genocide.” This subject receives nowhere near enough attention & by the time it does, it may well be too late. Friends, I’m not here to scare you for the sake of it. I’m here because I’ve risen from the ashes myself. I know what it feels like when your body is breaking down and the so-called “experts” keep pushing pills and shots instead of real solutions. Nature Always Provides Cures. Food Is Medicine. Change Your Food, Heal Your Life. That’s not a slogan for me — it’s how I got my freedom from illness. And right now Nature is screaming at us through the bees. Think about it. Every almond you eat, every apple, every blueberry, every cucumber, every single bite of real food that actually nourishes your body instead of inflaming it... depends on these tiny creatures. One third of everything on your plate. Without them we don’t just lose honey. We lose the foundation of real health. We lose the very food that keeps us free from the chronic sickness the system profits from. This isn’t “climate change” or “bad luck.” This is deliberate. A Bee Genocide. They’ve sprayed our fields with chemicals that don’t just kill weeds — they destroy the nervous systems of pollinators. They’ve paved over wildflower meadows and replaced them with monoculture crops that offer zero nutrition to bees. They’ve pushed GMOs and “modern farming” that treats the soil like dirt instead of the living medicine it is. And while we’re all distracted arguing about politics, the bees are vanishing at a rate that should have every single one of us marching in the streets. Last year alone the numbers were catastrophic. Over half the global population gone. Not in some far-off country — everywhere. Europe, North America, Asia... it doesn’t matter. The pattern is the same. And the silence from mainstream media and government is deafening. Why? Because a world without healthy food is a world easy to control. When fresh produce becomes scarce and expensive, people turn to the processed junk loaded with seed oils, sugars, and additives that make you sick. Then they sell you the “cures” — more shots, more pills, more dependency. Freedom from illness disappears when the very foundation of that freedom (real food) is taken away. But here’s what they don’t want you to know: Nature is already showing us the way out. Plant bee-friendly flowers in your yard or even in pots on your balcony — lavender, borage, clover, sunflowers. Stop using those toxic “weed and feed” products that kill everything good. Support small organic farmers who don’t spray their crops into oblivion. Learn about backyard beekeeping — yes, you really can do it. Thousands are already stepping up and becoming the solution instead of waiting for permission. I changed my food and healed my life. Now it’s time we protect the creatures that make that possible. This isn’t just about bees. This is about whether we still have the courage to choose Nature over the system that profits from our sickness. This is about whether we will wake up before the grocery shelves tell the story for us. Share this far and wide. Talk about it at dinner. Teach your children. Because if we lose the bees, we don’t just lose honey — we lose one of the last pure connections we have to the food that truly heals us. The Bee Genocide stops when enough of us refuse to stay silent. Nature always provides... but only if we protect her first. Food Is Medicine. Freedom From Illness starts in the garden and the hive. Who’s with me?

Saved - March 1, 2026 at 10:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that over 50% of the bees died last year; bees are responsible for a third of our food; it’s not an accident—it’s a bee genocide. This topic gets little attention, and by the time it does, it may be too late.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

“Did you know over 50% of the Bees in the World died last year?” “Bees are responsible for one third of our Food Sources.” “It’s not an accident...it’s a Bee Genocide.” This subject receives nowhere near enough attention & by the time it does, it may well be too late. https://t.co/ABQQMnMqLq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 centers the discussion on the veneration of the honeybee and makes a stark, unsettling assertion: bees are being murdered. The speaker claims that over half of the world’s bees died last year, presenting this as a staggering loss with wide-reaching consequences. They quantify the impact by noting that the United States alone lost $600,000,000 because bees pollinate and are responsible for one third of our food sources. This framing emphasizes the bees’ crucial role in food production and the economic stakes attached to their decline. In addressing the question of what is killing the bees, the speaker rejects the idea that climate change is the primary culprit, suggesting that this notion is being pushed upon the public. Instead, they assert that pesticides are a major contributing factor. Beyond pesticides, the speaker states a more alarmist and conspiratorial view by asserting beliefs that five g and chemtrails are killing the bees, and they insist that this is not an accident. They describe the situation as genocide, framing it as a deliberate or systematic attack rather than a random environmental phenomenon. The speaker further characterizes the situation with apocalyptic language, calling it the “bee apocalypse” and attributing the responsibility to the elite. This framing links the alleged deaths of bees to a broader, conspiratorial elite-driven agenda, suggesting intentional harm or neglect at the highest levels of power and influence. A dramatic consequence is emphasized: when the bees die, humans have four years left. This urgent timeline is presented as a direct result of the bees’ disappearance, underscoring the belief that pollination by bees is indispensable to human survival and global food systems. The speaker also cautions against adopting artificial intelligence as a substitute for bees, arguing that we are at the verge of losing our heritage to the most important creature that’s ever existed on this planet. Throughout, the emphasis remains on the essential, irreplaceable role of bees in the ecosystem and food production, paired with a sense of imminent doom if action or understanding does not align with the speaker’s asserted explanations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A very favorite subject, the veneration of the honeybee. What if I were to tell you that the bees are being murdered? Over half the bees in the world died last year. Do you know what cost The US $600,000,000 alone because the bees pollinate and thus are responsible for one third of our food sources? So what's killing the bees? Don't let anyone tell you it's climate change. They're trying to run that one past us. Yes. It's the pesticides, but I believe five g and chemtrails are killing the bees, and it's not an accident. This is genocide. This is the bee apocalypse, and I believe it is the work of the elite. When the bees die, humans have four years left. Don't accept AI as a substitute for bees because we are at the verge of losing our heritage to the most important creature that's ever existed on this planet.
Saved - March 1, 2026 at 12:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read Fox News claiming ice cream is made from plastic, saying this version uses materials from plastic bottles. It also mentions carrageenan and synthetic vanilla: carrageenan allegedly degrades to poligeenan that injures guts in lab gut-permeability tests, and synthetic vanilla is produced by breaking down PET into terephthalic acid then into vanillin.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Fox News reports Ice Cream being made out of plastic. “World's first ice cream made with plastic. You heard it right. This version of the sweet treat is actually made from the same materials found in plastic bottles.” Other harmful ingredients include Carrageenan & Synthetic Vanilla... Carrageenan degrades in the gut into Poligeenan which cause gut permeability 'leaky gut'. Researchers literally use it to intentionally injure guts & lab experiments. Synthetic vanilla is genetically engineered. Bacteria & enzymes are used to break down PET plastic used in water & soda bottles into terephthalic acid, then convert that into synthetic vanillin.

Saved - February 26, 2026 at 11:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim Dr. Eric Nepute was sued by the US Gov't for over $500 billion for promoting prevention with Vitamin D, Quercetin and Zinc. He treated over 11,000 Covid patients with zero deaths, yet the Biden admin went after him to push hospitalization, Remdesivir, and ventilators. The supposed medical scams of the pandemic have surfaced, but Nepute remains deplatformed, demonetized, and broke, while Fauci, Gates, and others grew billions with no persecution.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Dr Eric Nepute was sued by the US Gov't for over $500 BILLION, for helping patients & talking about prevention with Vitamin D, Quercetin & Zinc. Dr Nepute treated over 11,000 patients during Covid - not one died - yet the Biden Administration went after him because they didn’t want prevention or early treatment. They wanted people funneled into hospitals, given Remdesivir & put on ventilators. The truth about the medical scams during the pandemic have come out...yet, Dr Nepute is still deplatformed, demonetized, banned, lost millions in legal fees & had to start his life over...all while Fauci, Gates & others increased their wealth by billions with no persecution.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

video credit: @NeputeWellness

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@Lkona15 That is so wonderful to hear Lkona!

Saved - February 19, 2026 at 11:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that Japan delayed DTaP until age two in 1981, correlating with low infant mortality compared with the US. After two DTwP deaths in the 1970s, DTwP was halted, DTaP started for 2+, and in 1993 Japan stopped the MMR after severe reactions, keeping measles and rubella separate and never reintroducing mumps or MMR. The 1994 Immunization Act made vaccines voluntary. As of 2022, US infant mortality was 5.6/1000 vs Japan’s 1.7/1000.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"SIDS ‘DISAPPEARED’ In Japan After Raising The Age of Vaccination To 2yrs Old." — Dr. Pierre Kory, MD In 1981, Japan delayed the DTaP vaccine until children turned two years old. Japan holds one of the lowest infant mortality rates, while the US ranks among the highest. During the 1970s, following only two reported infant deaths linked to the whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTwP), intense public concern prompted the Japanese government to halt routine DTwP vaccinations. They later introduced the acellular pertussis version (DTaP) in 1981, but limited its use to children aged two and older. In 1993, Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labor & Welfare discontinued the combined MMR vaccine after it triggered a significant increase in severe adverse reactions — particularly aseptic meningitis resulting in serious harm and fatalities. Japan now provides separate measles and rubella vaccines and has never reintroduced the mumps component or the MMR combination shot. In 1994, Japan revised its Immunization Act, changing all childhood vaccinations from mandatory to voluntary/recommended status. This removed any penalties for declining vaccines and moved administration from mass public health clinics to individual choice via private doctors — prioritizing personal decision-making and informed consent. The U.S. continues to have the highest infant mortality rate among 16 other developed nations. As of 2022, the CDC reports the U.S. rate at 5.6 deaths per 1,000 live births. Japan’s rate remains among the world’s lowest at 1.7 per 1,000 — the U.S. rate is more than three times higher.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This actually happened in Japan. The speaker notes that Japan has taken actions on vaccine safety that many Western advanced health economies have not followed. After a rash of deaths in the seventies, Japan raised the age of vaccination to two years old. Guess what happened? When they did that, infant deaths disappeared. So, a country that noticed the signal and did something about it actually solved the problem. Neonatal mortality decreased.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This actually happened in Japan. I think this is really interesting because you look you look at how these two countries behave towards vaccines and vaccine safety. And Japan has done really some actions which are not followed by a lot of the other Western advanced health economies. But when they noticed this rash of deaths in the seventies, they saw what they did is they raised the age of vaccination to two years old. Guess what happened? When they did that, infant deaths disappeared. You know, so you have a country who noticed the signal, did something about it, actually solved the problem. Neonatal mortality decreased.
Saved - February 19, 2026 at 5:49 PM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Snow tested in Denton, TX...This is what was found in a sample of snow tested at NextLevel Labs. The results show multiple heavy metals at dangerously high levels: ~Aluminum ~Barium ~Strontium ~Mercury ~Lead ~Sulfur ~Nitrates https://t.co/GfonXUXz32

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a snowstorm in Texas during which a sample was taken to a lab. She references reports of people attempting to burn the snow, which would not burn. In the lab results, aluminum, barium, stonium, mercury, lead, sulfur, and nitrates were found at dangerously high levels. She states these are toxic chemical compounds known to harm the brain, the nervous system, and the environment. She adds, “You're not crazy for asking questions. You're crazy if you stay silent.” She mentions helping with brain fog symptoms all week in Texas. She asks whether the snow could be fake snow sent upon them and ends with the claim that everywhere we look is evil.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was in this snowstorm in Texas that just came. She took it to a lab. I've seen reports of people trying to burn the snow, and it wouldn't burn. She's they they found in this test aluminum, barium, stonium, mercury, lead, sulfur, nitrates, all at dangerously high levels. These are toxic chemical compounds known to harm the brain, the nervous system, and environment. You're not crazy for asking questions. You're crazy if you stay silent. You know, some of that they say will make you have like a brain fog. That's I'm here in Texas. I've helped that those symptoms of a brain fog all week. Could it be that fake snow that they sent upon us? Everywhere we look is evil.
Saved - February 14, 2026 at 1:43 PM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"5G isn't for faster internet—it's a microwave weapon developed by the military to disrupt your health & sleep." ~Michael Gibson https://t.co/VBJd1NrH0F

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: You've heard me talk about the five g towers and how it's not for Internet at all. It's a microwave weapon developed by the military to be used on the citizens. Take a look at this video. Speaker 1: They started at 09:11 at night until 09:11 in the morning. You see the pulse going from the East to the West Coast. Alright. Boom. You see that? Those are NEXRAD stations. Each of those towers are 750 kilowatts, pumping out between 2.7 to 2.9 gigahertz in the microwave range. This is roughly the same frequency as your microwave oven. Speaker 0: Now there are tons and tons of whistleblowers coming out about this technology and how dangerous and damaging and deadly it is. This is not for Internet. You wanna know if it's true? Go right up to one of those damn towers and see how good your service is. It's still gonna suck. These things are not for Internet service or communications. It's a weapon. They are frying you with microwaves while you sleep. If you saw in the video, did you notice where it wasn't? Where they weren't microwaving the population while they slept? All the areas of the country that are the least populated. Is that by accident? Those microwaves just magically don't go to those certain areas of the country? No. There's no reason to do it there. There's very few people that live there compared to the populated areas of the country that have huge cities in them. That's where you notice they are microwaving you to death. Are you feeling sick? Are you feeling lethargic? You can't think straight. You're not sleeping well. You're having crazy dreams. All of this stuff is radiation poisoning. Look up the symptoms of radiation poisoning. You're gonna see they identically match a lot of your symptoms that you're having. Funny enough, it also matches a lot of the symptoms of COVID. Crazy how that works. So I'm telling you guys, you have got to understand what's happening. And they're talking about putting up four times the amount of towers in the next four years. Why would they need that? We can prove that it's not for Internet. It's not for cell phone service. So why? You need to start asking yourself, why are they putting these things up at an unprecedented rate and then lying to your face about what they're for? Reach out. Let's connect. Let's figure out the plan of how we stop this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You've heard me talk about the five g towers and how it's not for Internet at all. It's a microwave weapon developed by the military to be used on the citizens. Take a look at this video. Speaker 1: They started at 09:11 at night until 09:11 in the morning. You see the pulse going from the East to the West Coast. Alright. Boom. You see that? Those are NEXRAD stations. Each of those towers are 750 kilowatts, pumping out between 2.7 to 2.9 gigahertz in the microwave range. This is roughly the same frequency as your microwave oven. Speaker 0: Now there are tons and tons of whistleblowers coming out about this technology and how dangerous and damaging and deadly it is. This is not for Internet. You wanna know if it's true? Go right up to one of those damn towers and see how good your service is. It's still gonna suck. These things are not for Internet service or communications. It's a weapon. They are frying you with microwaves while you sleep. If you saw in the video, did you notice where it wasn't? Where they weren't microwaving the population while they slept? All the areas of the country that are the least populated. Is that by accident? Those microwaves just magically don't go to those certain areas of the country? No. There's no reason to do it there. There's very few people that live there compared to the populated areas of the country that have huge cities in them. That's where you notice they are microwaving you to death. Are you feeling sick? Are you feeling lethargic? You can't think straight. You're not sleeping well. You're having crazy dreams. All of this stuff is radiation poisoning. Look up the symptoms of radiation poisoning. You're gonna see they identically match a lot of your symptoms that you're having. Funny enough, it also matches a lot of the symptoms of COVID. Crazy how that works. So I'm telling you guys, you have got to understand what's happening. And they're talking about putting up four times the amount of towers in the next four years. Why would they need that? We can prove that it's not for Internet. It's not for cell phone service. So why? You need to start asking yourself, why are they putting these things up at an unprecedented rate and then lying to your face about what they're for? Reach out. Let's connect. Let's figure out the plan of how we stop this.
Saved - February 11, 2026 at 9:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read a viral claim that Windows updates turn on OneDrive and relocate my files to Microsoft’s servers, making my PC a local mirror while the cloud holds the real copies. Family photos, docs, and memories can vanish; the desktop may go blank with only a “Where are my files?” prompt. Turning off OneDrive or deleting files can wipe the cloud. Recovery uses obscure settings; Microsoft rarely, plainly warns.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Bill Gates' Microsoft Can Delete Everything on Your Computer — Most People Have No Clue Until It’s Too Late! Jason Pargin's viral video is exposing a shocking hidden behavior in Windows that’s blindsiding millions of users. “I think they should have to go to jail for this.” Windows updates turn on OneDrive — with no honest, clear warning. Your files aren’t simply being “backed up.” They’re being **relocated** to Microsoft’s cloud servers. Your PC becomes little more than a local mirror. Microsoft’s servers now hold the real, authoritative version. Then the nightmare begins: - Family photos vanish - Critical documents disappear - Years of personal memories and work files — gone - Desktop suddenly blank - Only a tiny icon or message asking “Where are my files?” Many people initially believe they’ve been ransomware’d. They haven’t. Turning off OneDrive can wipe the local copies. Deleting files “to save space” also removes them from the cloud. Recovery usually requires digging through obscure settings or following random online guides. Nowhere does Microsoft clearly say in plain language: “We are moving all your files from your computer to our servers — and we now control them.” Millions click “Update” every day with zero idea this is happening behind the scenes. When a corporation can quietly take control of your personal files & erase them with one misclick — how is this not malware?

Video Transcript AI Summary
- The speaker claims Windows includes a piece of malware called OneDrive that will spontaneously delete all files off your computer, not from OneDrive but from your local machine. They say, “OneDrive will spontaneously delete all of the files off of your computer,” and that “all of my photos and videos of my family, all of my work files, everything is gone.” - They assert there is no warning, no confirmation button, and no pop-up before this happens. It “will start doing it” during a Windows update that begins using OneDrive, with “no plain language warning to opt out.” - OneDrive allegedly quietly uploads everything on the computer to Microsoft servers, and users may notice only when OneDrive warns that it’s running out of space. The user then looks up how to stop it and “you will get onto your computer the next day to find everything is gone.” - After deletion, the desktop shows a single icon that says, “where are my files?” They say many people thought they had been hit by ransomware or a virus. - When the user tries to recover, they are forced to download all the files back to the machine, which can take a long time on slow or metered Internet connections. - If the user then deletes the files from the local computer and also from OneDrive, the files are deleted from the computer again with “no warning, with no pop up, without anything.” - The only way to delete the files off the machine without also deleting them from OneDrive is to follow a YouTube tutorial with detailed steps, because there is no intuitive way in the menus. They emphasize there is no plain English explanation like, “Hey, do you want us to take everything on your computer and put it on our computer instead?” - The speaker argues that many people assume cloud storage is a backup, but OneDrive “secretly transfers your machine to their machine so that their machine is the primary. Those files are the copy of the files.” When you work on the local machine, it is treated as temporary access to those files. This slows the machine because it writes and reads data to the cloud rather than the hard drive. - Practically, if anything happens to the file on OneDrive’s machine, it’s deleted everywhere because it’s now only on their machine, and you are only allowed to temporarily access it. The speaker notes this is “very intuitive” to accidentally delete everything, and questions how this was allowed to go out the door. - The concluding point: when OneDrive says it’s full and you delete things to free up space, it deletes them from your machine too, which the speaker finds unbelievable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think they should have to go to jail for this. I'm only barely joking here. If you're unaware, for the last few years, Windows has come with a piece of malware called OneDrive, and OneDrive, if you're not careful, will spontaneously delete all of the files off of your computer. Not on their computer on OneDrive, I mean off of your machine, the one that's in your house. If you have been fortunate enough to not have your life ruined by OneDrive, just Google that word and you will find a torrent of people saying, It took everything. All of my photos and videos of my family, all of my work files, everything is gone. OneDrive will not give you any warning whatsoever that it is about to do this. It will not give you a confirmation button to hit. It will not give you a pop up or anything. Here's how it happens. At some point, your Windows computer will update to start using OneDrive. At no point in the process will you be given any kind of a plain language warning to opt out of it. It will just start doing it. Then at some point, will notice that it is quietly uploading everything on your computer to Microsoft servers. Some of you will only notice this because you're on a slow or metered Internet connection and it's trying to upload 40 gigabytes of video and work files and private records. Or you may have only found out when OneDrive gave you a warning that it was running out of space. So you will look up how do I make it stop doing that, and you will find the option to turn off OneDrive backup. Then you will get onto your computer the next day to find everything is gone. Everything on your computer was deleted by Microsoft. And on your desktop, completely clean of icons, will be one cheeky little icon that says, where are my files? Many, many people who saw this assumed they had been hit by a ransomware attack or a virus where some hacker has stolen all of their data and is now holding it hostage. So you click on that icon that says, don't worry, all of your life's work is now on our machine. We helpfully deleted it from your machine without ever asking you. But we're still not at the worst part because at this point, you'll be forced to download all of your stuff back to your machine. Again, God help you if you're on a slow or metered Internet connection because you now have to grab the many gigabytes of work and slowly bring it back. At which point you will say, okay, Microsoft, I don't want you to have my files. I want to delete them off of OneDrive. So on your local computer, you will have all of the files on your local machine now, and then it will show where those files also on OneDrive. So you will go into OneDrive and you will delete them. Only to find that when you delete them off of Microsoft servers, they go in and delete them off your computer again with no warning, with no pop up, without anything. The only way to delete the files off their machine without also deleting them off of your machine is to go find a YouTube tutorial walking through the detailed steps on how to do it. To be absolutely clear, to make OneDrive not do this requires looking it up. There is no intuitive way to do it. They intentionally buried those options in the menus, and none of those options say in plain English what they do. At no point in any of this does it come out and say in plain English, Hey, do you want us to take everything on your computer and put it on our computer instead? If it did say that, everyone would say no. They realize this. The issue is that by now, everybody is familiar with the concept of storing files on the cloud. Lots of machines offer the cloud as a backup if you want. You would assume that that's what OneDrive is. It's a chance to back up your files in case something happens to your local machine, but that is not what it is. OneDrive secretly transfers your machine to their machine so that their machine is the primary. Those files are the copy of the files. When you work on your local machine, they treat it as you temporarily accessing those files. This, of course, massively slows down your machine because instead of writing and reading data to your hard drive, you're having to upload and download it to the cloud. What this means in practice is if anything happens to the file on their machine, it's deleted everywhere because you no longer have it. It's only on their machine. You're just allowed to temporarily access it. And at no point anywhere do they explain in plain language that this is what they're doing. It is so unintuitive that it is very easy to accidentally delete everything you have everywhere. Do you understand when OneDrive says that it's full and you go in to delete some things to free up space, it deletes it from your machine too? I genuinely cannot believe that this was allowed to go out the door like this or that nobody else stepped in to stop them.
Saved - February 11, 2026 at 4:25 AM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

The 6-year Anniversary of the most egregious Crimes Against Humanity is almost here... “We have people walking around without an immune system…no ability to make an immune system…they were injected with 81 strands of foreign bacteria…and 8 strands of foreign HIV…” https://t.co/6eJvbsRNl1

Saved - February 9, 2026 at 2:01 AM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"Glyphosate was NEVER meant to come in contact with our food. It was patented to strip the minerals off the walls of pipes." ~Jeffrey Smith "It makes plants mineral deficient, it makes animals mineral deficient & it makes us mineral deficient." https://t.co/9p1FS7mUJ2

Saved - February 8, 2026 at 9:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Coffee is a superfood & longevity drink. Chlorogenic acid boosts circulation, supports stem cell function, aids gut health, slows aging by protecting telomeres, and fights fat by activating brown fat. 1-2 cups daily (caffeinated or decaf) benefits health & metabolism. It’s not acidic to blood pH; organic, mold-free coffee has more chlorogenic acid. Takeaway: the right coffee can enhance circulation, slow aging, protect cells, and burn fat.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"Coffee is a superfood & longevity drink. Chlorogenic Acid—delivers serious health benefits." ~Dr William Li, MD Here's 5 ways in which Coffee is good for you... 🔥 1. Boosts Circulation ▪️ Chlorogenic acid improves blood flow, leading to better oxygenation of your brain, muscles & organs. ▪️ This isn’t just a quick boost—it enhances circulation long-term with regular coffee consumption. 🧬 2. Protects & Regenerates Stem Cells ▪️ Stem cells help your body repair & regenerate tissues. ▪️ Coffee supports stem cell function, which means faster recovery & better cellular health. 🦠 3. Supports Gut Health ▪️ The gut microbiome influences immunity, metabolism & brain function. ▪️ Chlorogenic acid helps balance gut bacteria, promoting better digestion & a stronger immune system. ⏳ 4. Slows Down Aging ▪️ It protects telomeres (the caps on DNA that shorten with age). ▪️ Slower telomere degradation = longer cellular lifespan = anti-aging effects. 💪 5. Fights Excess Body Fat ▪️ It prevents new fat cells from being made. ▪️ Chlorogenic acid activates brown fat, a special kind of fat that helps burn off harmful white or visceral fat. 1-2 cups of daily Coffee - both caffeinated & decaffeinated - is great for your health, longevity & metabolism! Dr William Li sets the record straight: "Coffee does not make your blood more acidic, as some people claim. As a physician & scientist who is taking care of people in the ICU, your body is a perfect balancer of PH in your blood at all times. Your blood is tightly controlled in a very narrow range. You cannot acidify your blood with coffee. If you actually had acidic blood you would be in the ICU with sepsis." You can benefit even more by choosing mold free organic coffee. Organic coffee has 3X times the amount of Chlorogenic Acid than conventional coffee. 💡 The Takeaway For That Daily Cup Of Coffee ▪️ Coffee isn’t just caffeine—it’s a longevity drink. ▪️ The right coffee (organic, mold-free, without sugar & junk additives) can enhance circulation, slow aging, protect your body at a cellular level, encourage a healthy gut microbiome & burn body fat.

Saved - February 8, 2026 at 4:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I share a clip alleging governments engineer plagues to target populations. It links HIV’s rise to Fauci’s NIAID years and says COVID injections rewrite DNA. It claims Zappa’s father worked in top-secret bio labs and that the clip was buried to hide a scheme, asking if the same man ran two pandemics by lab leak or deliberate deployment.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨1984 BANNED Frank Zappa interview reveals lab-created viruses as BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS – and it's NO COINCIDENCE Anthony Fauci oversaw BOTH HIV & COVID! Zappa’s father worked in TOP-SECRET chemical & biological warfare labs – Frank KNEW the dark truth: governments engineer plagues to target populations. HIV “emerges” in the 80s? Exactly when Fauci is running NIAID & steers the narrative. COVID hits? Same Fauci, same playbook, now forcing experimental “gene therapy” injections that REWRITE YOUR DNA forever. This clip was BURIED for decades because it exposes the plan. Why is the SAME guy in charge of TWO “once-in-a-century” pandemics? Lab leak? Or DELIBERATE DEPLOYMENT?

Saved - February 8, 2026 at 12:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe cholesterol isn’t the enemy; calcium drives most arterial plaque, not cholesterol. Inflammation causes atherosclerosis, with root factors like low vitamin D, magnesium, K2; calcium supplements, seed oils, sugar, insulin resistance, obesity, toxins, poor sleep, stress. A whole-food, low-carb diet focused on nutrient-dense animal foods, avoiding seed oils and sugar, supports a healthy cholesterol profile. Keep triglycerides low and HDL high; aim TG/HDL <1.5.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"Cholesterol isn't the enemy, it is essential...Don't blame cholesterol for the harm that calcium causes." ~Dr Hal Huggins "Only 0.5% of arterial plaque is Cholesterol...90% Of the plaque is Calcium." "So where's the problem...Calcium Or Cholesterol?" Cholesterol is the most important molecule in your body. 60% of your brain is fat & 30% of that is cholesterol. Your hormones, cell membranes & nervous system all depend on it. The mainstream message that high cholesterol causes clogged arteries is fraudulent & wrong. Studies show that arterial plaque is mostly calcium — not cholesterol. Only 0.5% of the plaque is cholesterol. The rest? Over 90% is calcium buildup. Atherosclerosis is caused by inflammation. Plaque is not a Cholesterol disease or a Statin deficiency. Cholesterol is not the cause of the Inflammation that turns to arterial plaque & atherosclerosis. The Root Causes of Inflammation include the following: Low Vitamin D Levels Magnesium Deficiency K2 Deficiency Calcium Supplements Industrial Seed Oils Processed Sugar Carbohydrates Insulin Resistance Ultra Processed Foods Smoking Obesity Environmental Toxins Poor Sleep Lack of Exercise Stress A whole food, low carbohydrate diet prioritizing nutrient dense animal foods, eliminating harmful seed oils & sugar, provides the best healthy cholesterol profile. This lifestyle keeps Triglycerides low & HDL high, which is one of the best biomarkers for heart health. TG/HDL ratio should be less than 1.5 to eliminate CVD risk.

Video Transcript AI Summary
- The speaker claims cholesterol is one of the most important things in the body and asserts, from “the scientific literature in cardiology,” that “everything that you hear in the advertisements for lowering cholesterol is fraudulent.” They say, “Cholesterol You betcha.” - They claim, “25 to 30% of the brain's made out of cholesterol,” and pose, “How many people need brains? Nobody in politics.” - On arterial plaque, they state: “What does it turn out to be? 1.5% of the plaque is fat, and of that, point 5% is cholesterol.” - They conclude, “90% of it's calcium. So where's the problem? Calcium or cholesterol? Calcium. You bet.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cholesterol happens to be one of the most important things in your body. I can assure you, and I can prove it from the scientific literature in cardiology, that everything that you hear in the advertisements for lowering cholesterol is fraudulent. Cholesterol You betcha. 25 to 30% of the brain's made out of cholesterol. How many people need brains? Nobody in politics. They talk about the cholesterol in the arteries. Yeah, that's been studied. What does it turn out to be? 1.5% of the plaque is fat, and of that, point 5% is cholesterol. 90% of it's calcium. So where's the problem? Calcium or cholesterol? Calcium. You bet.
Saved - February 7, 2026 at 2:55 PM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

WEF World Economic Forum Bioethicist, Dr Matthew Liao...We can induce 'meat allergy' to reduce meat consumption by using Lone Star Ticks as bioengineered weapons. https://t.co/f5o5AEJtge

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker presents two examples to illustrate how human engineering might address large-scale global problems. First, they argue that reducing meat consumption would significantly benefit the planet, but acknowledge that people are not willing to give up meat. Some individuals might be willing to cut back, yet they struggle with a weakness of will. The speaker admits personal temptations, noting that the steak’s juiciness can be a barrier to reducing meat intake. Second, the speaker discusses a potential approach to overcoming such barriers by leveraging human engineering to create intolerance to certain kinds of meat, particularly bovine proteins. They relate this to everyday experiences with intolerances, such as milk intolerance, and mention that some people are intolerant to crayfish. The idea is that if people could be engineered to be intolerant to specific meats, it could curb consumption. To illustrate a natural analogue, they reference the long star tick, which causes people to become allergic to meat after a bite. The speaker indicates that the mechanism behind this allergy exists and suggests that a similar mechanism could be replicated or induced in humans through engineering. The overarching claim is that such engineered intolerances could be a tool to address significant global problems by shaping dietary behaviors. In sum, the speaker contends that human engineering might be used to generate selective meat intolerances, drawing on real-world allergies as a model, and posits that this could help tackle major world issues related to meat consumption and its environmental impact. The discussion emphasizes the potential of engineering-driven solutions to influence human behavior in ways that could benefit the planet, while acknowledging human resistance and personal temptations to consume meat.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I'll give two examples. So one is that people eat too much meat, right? And if they were to cut down on their consumption on meat, then it would actually really help the planet. But people are not willing to give up meat. Some people will be willing to, but other people, they may be willing to, but they have a weakness of will. They say, Wow, this steak is just too juicy. I can't do it. I'm one of those, by the way. So here's a thought. So it turns out that we know a lot about so we have this intolerance to for example I have milk intolerance and some people are intolerant to crayfish. So possibly we can use human engineering to make it the case that we're intolerant to certain kinds of meat, to certain kinds of bovine proteins. And there's actually analogues of this in life. There's this thing called the long star tick, where if it bites you, you will become allergic to meat. I can sort of describe the mechanism. So that's something that we can do through human engineering. We can kinda possibly address really big world problems through human engineering. Another
Saved - February 7, 2026 at 12:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve learned orthopedics tops medical corruption, with oncology close behind. Surgeons pick implants for kickbacks, not patient welfare. Medical errors are the 3rd leading cause of death in the U.S.—about 440,000 lives yearly. My protection: never leave a loved one alone in the hospital; have a trusted advocate there 24/7, especially at night. The system favors sick care profits over healing. Share experiences to expose risks.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Orthopedics is the most corrupt medical specialty — oncology ranks a close 2nd, according to investigative journalist Gardiner Harris. Surgeons choose implants & devices based on kickbacks, royalties & speaking fees rather than what’s best for the patient. Medical errors are now the 3rd leading cause of death in the U.S. — claiming roughly 440,000 lives every year (about 1,200 people per day). Your best protection? Never leave a loved one alone in the hospital. Have a trusted family member or advocate present 24/7, especially at night when visiting hours end. The system is built around “sick care” profits, not healing. Arrange overlapping shifts so the patient is never without protection. Have you or someone you know experienced implant failure, unnecessary surgery, or hospital negligence? Share your story below — the more we expose, the safer we become.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Orthopedics is described as by far the most corrupt form of medicine, with oncology identified as next in line. The speaker claims that orthopedic consultants frequently work for device companies, and as a result, the choice of the implanted device in a patient’s body is often determined by the amount of money a company will pay them to select that device. The speaker emphasizes that patients should know the manufacturer of the device inside them because recalls occur, and many people later learn that their hip or other implant needed to be removed because their doctor did not inform them. The speaker asserts that listeners should understand this information, especially if someone they love goes to the hospital. The speaker argues for being proactive in hospital settings, stating that you should have someone at the gate and with you at all times, asking questions, because this is your health and you need someone fighting for it. They reference a favorite study in medicine that surveyed doctors about their patients, noting that the patients whom doctors and nurses liked the least were the ones with the highest survival numbers. From this, the speaker implies that interpersonal dynamics between healthcare providers and patients may influence outcomes, though the claim focuses on the correlation observed in the survey. Finally, the speaker advises that when you go to the hospital, you should not try to be friends with everybody; this is your health and you need to fight for it, and you need someone there who is fighting for you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Orthopedics is by far the most corrupt form of medicine. Oncology is next. Orthopedics are routinely consultants for device companies and so the choice of the device that is in your body is often determined by the amount of money that one company will pay them in order to choose that device. You should know the manufacturer of the device inside of you because there are recalls. Many people never heard that they're hip needed to get pulled out of them because their doctor just simply didn't tell them you need to know this stuff if you have a loved one who goes to the hospital you need a service at the gate you have to have someone with you all the time asking questions one of my favorite studies in medicine was done was surveying doctors about their patients about who they liked and who they didn't like and the patients that were disliked the most by doctors and nurses had the highest survival numbers. When you go to the hospital, don't try to be friends with everybody. This is your health you need to fight for it and you need someone there fighting for
Saved - February 5, 2026 at 4:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I quote Dr. Hal Huggins: cholesterol is beneficial. I list 15 perceived benefits: absorption of vitamins A, D, E, K; digestion; immune protection; lower cancer and mortality risk; less depression and stress; protection from toxins; brain requires fat and cholesterol; prevents dementia; protects against mortality; steroid hormones; muscles and bones; protects against stroke and heart disease; lungs; building block of cells and mitochondria.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"The only bad thing about Cholesterol is not having enough!" ~Dr Hal Huggins "One of the biggest defenses against stroke is Cholesterol." Top 15 benefits of Cholesterol... 1) Absorption of Vitamins A, D, E & K. 2) Critical for digestion & bile acids. 3) Immune system protection against infections. 4) Lowers risk of cancer & death. 5) Lowers risk of depression & suicide. 6) Lowers stress, cortisol & anxiety. 7) Protects against chemicals, toxins & heavy metals. 8) Optimal Brain is 60% fat & 25% cholesterol. 9) Prevents dementia & cognitive decline. 10) Protects against all cause mortality. 11) Production of all steroid hormones. 12) Necessary for muscles & bone density. 13) Protective against stroke & heart disease. 14) Important for lungs & airways. 15) Building block of all cells & mitochondria.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that “Bad cholesterol” is a misnomer and claims it is “the biggest fraud.” They state they have spent countless hours researching cholesterol and that “None of it says anything about cholesterol being bad.” They assert that “The only bad thing about cholesterol is not having enough,” and claim that “One of the biggest defenses against stroke is cholesterol.” They further connect depression to serotonin levels, stating “Depression is directly related to how much serotonin is in the body,” and conclude that “Who controls the amount of serotonin that's manufactured? Cholesterol.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bad cholesterol is what makes estrogen and testosterone and aldosterone and cortisol and things like this. That's bad? This is the biggest fraud. I have spent countless hours working on cholesterol, which is all from the scientific literature. None of it says anything about cholesterol being bad. The only bad thing about cholesterol is not having enough. One of the biggest defenses against stroke is cholesterol. Depression is directly related to how much serotonin is in the body. Who controls the amount of serotonin that's manufactured? Cholesterol.
Saved - January 28, 2026 at 7:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe Fauci's COVID protocol as “no treatment until you go to the hospital, then ventilators & Remdesivir.” I allege Remdesivir killed people—“54% in 5 days” in the Ebola trial; the safety board ordered its termination, calling the study fraudulent and homicidal. I claim kidney, heart, and liver damage; infant approval at birth for 3 lb babies after limited testing. Doctors reportedly said the virus wasn’t to blame—Remdesivir was.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

RFK Jr. on Fauci's COVID protocols: "Our protocol was NO treatment until you go to the hospital. Then your treatments are two things: Ventilators & Remdesivir." "Tony Fauci knew that Remdesivir would kill you. It was lethal to 54% of people in 5 days during the Ebola trial." "The safety monitoring board ordered him to terminate the use of that drug when the 2019 Ebola trial failed." "He contrived an absolutely fraudulent study that he manipulated & orchestrated. It is homicide." How does Remdesivir kill? RFK Jr: "Kidney failure. Heart Failure. All organ collapse." The Ebola trial safety monitoring board halted & removed Remdesivir from the clinical setting, citing it was "too lethal & unethical" to be included as a possible Ebola treatment drug. • 2.81X Kidney failure—permanent damage in patients. • Heart damage: Triggers fatal arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, & bradycardia. • Liver injury: Causes severe, irreversible hepatocyte damage. • Infant approved: Now FDA-approved for newborns at birth as long as they weigh 3lbs—tested on just 58 infants for 10 days! Doctors during COVID stated: "We've never seen a virus that attacks the kidneys. Because, it wasn't the Virus. It was Remdesivir." Share your 'Run-Death-Is-Near' Remdesivir stories below...

Saved - January 27, 2026 at 3:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see BlackRock turning nature into tradable blockchain tokens—forests, rivers, ecosystems—creating infinite collateral for their debt machine, all under their AI Aladdin. Under the slogan of “saving the planet,” this isn’t environmentalism; it’s financial domination of life.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Whitney Webb..."BlackRock wants to turn EVERYTHING nature gave us—forests, rivers, entire ecosystems—into tradable Wall Street tokens on a blockchain." It's a heist: infinite new collateral for their endless debt machine, all tracked & controlled by their AI overlord, Aladdin. Under the feel-good banner of "saving the planet"? This isn't environmentalism. This is total financial domination of the living world.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The argument is that BlackRock, by unlocking and taking control of as many natural assets as possible that aren't currently part of the financial system, can deepen and expand its control over not just people in the existing financial system, but really over the natural world as well and essentially turn everything alive into a tradable Wall Street financial product. The goal, as described for Larry Fink in particular, is to develop new asset classes that can be used to fuel their existing business model and perpetuate it for millennia forward. One idea discussed for years is natural assets, what they call nature's economy—actual assets as possible that aren't currently part of the financial system—as a way to perpetuate what they do and broaden their control over the natural world, turning the natural world into tradable financial products. The supposed plan includes having all of this on a universal ledger on blockchain, presumably, and making it trackable and surveillable, so that it can be surveillable and automated. In this framework, Larry Fink would have his risk management AI—Aladdin—exercise control over these assets in unprecedented ways, to serve their benefit. Concurrently, there is movement toward a new financial governance system that pushes infrastructure toward a “green model” or decarbonization. The broader aim of the global carbon market, according to the narrative, is to unlock many new assets and far more collateral, enabling the creation of new debt and expanding the existing models to unprecedented levels, effectively perpetuating them indefinitely. A central feature of the natural asset concept, at least in the natural asset corporation model, is that you identify a natural asset such as a forest, river, or lake, and then, at no cost to you, you issue shares in that natural asset and sell those shares. The implication is that you can point to something in the natural world and declare it yours, fractionalize it, and generate money almost out of thin air by selling those shares. The natural world is vast, and the claim is that they’re financializing it all, framing it as the only way to save the planet. But really, it’s the only way for them to save their insane debt racket.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As an asset manager, you know, BlackRock having being able to unlock and take control of as many natural assets as as possible that aren't currently part of the financial system is obviously, a way for them to perpetuate what they do and deepen and expand their control over not just people in the existing financial system, but really over the natural world as well and essentially turn everything alive into a tradable Wall Street financial product. It seems like in Larry Fink's case in particular, there's a goal, well, a big ambition there to develop new asset classes that can be used to basically fuel their existing business model and perpetuate it for like, I don't know, millennia forward. So one of these that I wrote, I've been writing about for a few years is the whole idea of natural assets, what they call nature's economy. Actual assets as possible that aren't currently part of the financial system is obviously a way for them to perpetuate what they do and deepen and expand their control over not just, you know, people in the existing financial system, but really over the natural world as well and essentially turn everything alive into a tradable Wall Street financial product. And the goal, as Fink has stated, is to have all of this on a universal ledger on blockchain presumably and have it be trackable and surveillable by having it all surveillable and automated in a sense, he's able to have his risk management AI thing, Aladdin sort of exercise control over it in unprecedented ways, I think, for their benefit. And then of course, lot of what's happening now as we're moving into this new financial governance system is the push to change all of the infrastructure towards this, you know, quote unquote green model, I guess, or decarbonization. Part of the goal of the whole global carbon market thing for them is that it allows them to unlock so many new assets and so much more collateral and so much other stuff to create new debt out of and to just sort of expand the existing models they use to just unprecedented levels and sort of perpetuate this into infinity. One of the things too about the natural asset thing, at least as far as the natural asset corporation model is concerned, is that you literally just go into a forest or you go to a river or lake and you identify the natural asset and then at no cost to you, just after identifying it, you issue shares in the natural asset, a lake, a forest, whatever, and then you sell those shares. I mean, it's literally just pointing out something outside and being like, this is mine, I'm going to fractionalize it and sell it to people and you're producing money in like out of thin air essentially. And you're able to do that. Mean the natural world is vast and huge and they're they're doing this. They're financializing it all as framing it as the only way to save the planet. But really it's the only way for them to save their insane debt racket.
Saved - January 23, 2026 at 11:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that 100% of the top twenty fast-food brands tested contained glyphosate. Panera Bread had the highest at 439.11 ppb; Chipotle the lowest at 4.65 ppb (94.4x lower). Arby’s, Dairy Queen, and Little Caesars also showed high levels (223.33, 126, 128 ppb). Panda Express and McDonald’s were 4.75 and 5.58 ppb. Across 42 meals, total glyphosate reached 2089 ppb, and the piece cites animal studies where 0.1 ppb caused organ damage.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"100% of Top Twenty Fast Food brands contained alarming levels of Glyphosate." -Zen Honeycutt Panera Bread, a self-proclaimed proprietor of 'clean, wholesome foods' ranked highest worst Glyphosate of 439 ppb. Chipotle ranked safest, with 94X lower Glyphosate of only 4.6 ppb. Glyphosate Causes: liver & kidney disease, kills sperm, has been shown to androgenize baby girls, increase autism symptoms, increased miscarriages & prenatal births & birth defects. Population Control is a globalist initiative and this poison is being put in our food? Coincidence?….How is this legal? Food in America is chemical poison. Glyphosate Fast Food Testing Results... -100% of Top Twenty Fast Food brands contained alarming glyphosate residues. -Studies in lab animals show that 0.1 ppb of glyphosate cause liver & organ damage. -The highest levels detected totaling 439.11 ppb were in Panera Bread, a self-proclaimed proprietor of "good food" & "clean, wholesome foods." -The second highest levels of glyphosate were found in Arby's sandwiches, totaling 223.33 ppb of glyphosate. -Dairy Queen & Little Caesar’s were nearly tied for third highest, at 126 ppb & 128 ppb total glyphosate detected, respectively. -The lowest levels were found in Chipotle meals, totaling 4.65 ppb, a whopping 94.4 times lower than the highest level, 439.11 ppb detected in Panera Bread. Chipotle was one of the first fast food restaurants to advertise non-GMO and organic ingredients. -Next lowest were Panda Express & McDonald's at 4.75 and 5.58 ppb, respectively. -The total amount of glyphosate detected in 42 types of fast food meals (between 1-3 samples of each were used for testing for hundreds of contaminants) was 2089 ppb, a level over 20,000 times higher than the amount (.1 ppb) that has been found to cause severe organ damage, specifically liver disease, in animal studies.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Zen from Moms Across America states that Panera Bread had the highest level of glyphosate among all of the top 20 fast food restaurants tested. They acknowledge Panera’s public claim of “clean ingredients,” and emphasize that glyphosate is not clean. Glyphosate, known widely as Roundup, is described as the most widely used herbicide in the world. It is called a carcinogen and an endocrine disruptor, and is said to cause liver and kidney disease. It is described as a neurotoxin and a nervous system damager, and is said to kill sperm and to androgenize baby girls. The speaker notes that these effects are from animal studies. Zen mentions that there are many human studies as well showing a connection to increased miscarriages and prenatal births and birth defects. The message is that Panera Bread needs to do better, and they should put glyphosate on their no-no list and require that their suppliers only provide wheat and grains that have not been sprayed with glyphosate. The speaker states that they are asking Panera to do that, and that thousands of signatures are needed. The speaker urges viewers to visit momsacrossamerica.org, click on action, and find the fast food petitions page under action. The goal is to help get Panera to put glyphosate on the no-no list, describing this as a huge win for the food industry because Panera is one of the biggest purchasers of wheat products, using it for sandwich breads across the country. The appeal is for petition signatures to press Panera to adopt a glyphosate-free standard for their ingredients.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys, Zen from Moms Across America. Did you know that Panera Bread had the highest level of glyphosate of all of the top 20 fast food restaurants we tested? Yes. And they are the ones that say right on the wall, clean ingredients. Well folks, glyphosate is not clean, okay? Glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide in the world. You may know it as Roundup, and it is a carcinogen, an endocrine disruptor. It causes liver and kidney disease. It's a neurotoxin and a nervous system damager. It also kills sperm and has been shown to androgenize baby girls, increase autism symptoms in baby male These are all animal studies. There are many human studies as well showing connection to increased miscarriages and prenatal births and birth defects. So is Panera Bread needs to do better, okay? They can put glyphosate on their no no list and they can require that their suppliers only give them wheat and grains that have not been sprayed with glyphosate. So we're asking them to do that. We need thousands signatures, folks. We really need to get this done. Go to momsacrossamerica.org, click on action, and under action is our fast food petitions page. Please help us get Panera to put glyphosate on the no no list. And this would be huge for the food industry cause Panera is one of the biggest purchasers of, you know, wheat products out there. They use it sandwich breads all, you know, day long and in all across the country. So please help us get the petition signed.
Saved - January 22, 2026 at 10:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that the government backs Monsanto in Supreme Court efforts to dodge Roundup cancer liability. Paraquat, 28X deadlier than glyphosate, can kill with 1 teaspoon and has no antidote. Dr. Tarek Pacha warns it’s the top toxic ingredient in our food system. DEC 2, 2025 update notes MAHA allies furious as Big Ag envoys push immunity. Paraquat causes multi-organ failure, pulmonary fibrosis, Parkinson’s risk, thyroid disease, cancers, and more across many crops.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨 BREAKING: Government Sides with Monsanto to Shield Roundup from Cancer Lawsuits – Betraying MAHA Allies. Paraquat, 28X MORE Lethal Than Glyphosate, Is Another Legal Poison With US EPA Approval! One Sip Can Kill A Human with NO Antidote! 🚨 As a functional urologist & surgeon, Dr. Tarek Pacha warns: This is the #1 toxic ingredient to AVOID – the legal poison dousing America's crops, fueling an epidemic of Parkinson's, cancer & organ failure. The US EPA refuses to join the global ban, while over 10 million pounds are sprayed yearly on our food supply. **DEC 2, 2025 UPDATE:** The Government is backing Monsanto (now Bayer) in its Supreme Court push to evade liability for cancer claims tied to Roundup weedkiller. This enrages Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) allies, who fight Big Ag's toxic grip – yet here we are, letting paraquat ravage lives unchecked also. Paraquat is 28X MORE TOXIC THAN GLYPHOSATE: Just 1 teaspoon can kill a human, triggering multi-organ shutdown with no cure. Here's the devastating toll: 1⃣ **Multi-Organ Failure:** After ingestion, inhalation, or skin exposure, organs start failing on day 1 – lungs, liver, kidneys, heart systematically collapsing. Victims can suffer up to 30 agonizing days before death. 2⃣ **Pulmonary Fibrosis:** Paraquat triggers irreversible lung scarring, causing chronic, excruciating pain and a desperate fight for every breath. High mortality, zero antidote – 28X deadlier than glyphosate. 3⃣ **Parkinson's Disease:** The brutal reality? Scientists use paraquat to *induce* Parkinson's in lab animals for research. As a neurotoxin, it destroys dopamine neurons, spiking Parkinson's risk by up to 6X. Paraquat also fuels thyroid disease & cancer, CKD (chronic kidney disease), childhood leukemia & non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. **Common Crops Drenched in Paraquat:** Soybean, corn, grapes, peanuts, pistachios, almonds, cotton, wheat & oats. (Sneaky alert: They hide in oils, additives, sweeteners & animal feed – hitting *everyone*.)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Pasha, a functional urologist and surgeon, identifies paraquat as the number one toxic ingredient to ban. He notes it is a legal poison spread across America and into our food, a highly toxic herbicide that kills weeds but kills us fast. Despite being banned in over 70 countries, including China, paraquat is still widely used in American agriculture, with up to eight to ten million pounds spread on farmland. The biggest offenders he cites include crops such as soybeans, corn, peanuts, grapes, pistachios, and even cotton used for clothing. He criticizes a recent development: section 454 or 453 (referred to as “section four fifty three” in the talk) a bill passed with no public vote. He claims this bill shields companies like Syngenta, the maker of paraquat, and similar companies from the consequences of poisoning Americans, and that the EPA approves it while the body rejects it. He explains the paradox of this situation in his view. Regarding how deadly paraquat is, Dr. Pasha states that one sip can kill you and there is no antidote. He explains that paraquat causes multi-organ failure, including the lungs, liver, kidneys, and even the heart. It causes pulmonary fibrosis, as paraquat accumulates in the lungs and, over time, can cause scarring leading to respiratory failure. He also claims a link to Parkinson’s disease, indicating exposure could increase the risk of acquiring Parkinson’s disease by up to six times. Additional concerns he mentions include higher farmer mortality, DNA cellular death, and reproductive problems. He references legal action, mentioning that there are 6,354 and counting lawsuits as of July 2025 with the maker Syngenta in settlement talks. Bottom line, he asserts, paraquat is not just a weed killer; it is a neurotoxic, lung-scarring, DNA-mutant chemical sprayed on foods. Although banned globally, it remains in use in the USA. What can be done now, according to Dr. Pasha? Share this information with loved ones; buy local and know your farmer—ask if they use herbicides such as paraquat or other herbicides. If possible, choose regenerative or organic options. He also urges avoiding ultra-processed foods with conventional ingredients and directs viewers to see the caption below for lists of foods most heavily sprayed by paraquat and other offenders. He concludes by encouraging voting with one’s wallet, asserting that people will be listened to when they make healthy choices, promoting “Healthy choices, stronger you.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The number one toxic ingredient that I would ban right now. Go grab a pen. Write it down. I'm doctor Pasha, functional urologist and surgeon here to challenge the status quo. Ready, Max? I'm referring to paraquat, a legal poison that is spread all across America and into our food. It's a highly toxic herbicide that kills weeds but kills us fast. Despite being banned in over 70 countries, including China, paraquat is still widely used in American agriculture. A staggering amount of up to eight to 10,000,000 pounds of paraquat are spread or used across our farmland. The biggest offenders include soybean, corn, peanuts, grapes, pistachios, and even cotton that make our clothes. Guys, what actually disgust me is that just this week, section four fifty three, it's a bill passed with no public vote. This bill shields company like Syngenta, the maker of Paraquat, and companies like that from the consequences of poisoning Americans. And the EPA approves it, yet our body rejects it. How so? Let me tell you. How deadly is this stuff? One sip can kill you, and there is no antidote. Paraquat actually causes multi organ failure such as lung, liver, kidney, and even heart. Number two, pulmonary fibrosis. Paraquat actually accumulates in your lungs and over time can cause scarring, which could lead to respiratory failure down the road. And number three, Parkinson's disease. Exposure could increase your risk of acquiring Parkinson's disease by up to six times. Not to mention it has been associated with higher farmer mortality, DNA cellular death, and reproductive problems. There are 6,354 and counting lawsuits as of July 2025 with the maker Syngenta in settlement talks as we speak. Bottom line, paraquat is not just a weed killer. It's a neurotoxic, lung scarring, DNA mutant chemical that is sprayed all over our food. It's banned globally, but not here in The USA. What can we do right now? Number one, you can share this information with all your loved ones. Number two, buy local. Know your farmer. Ask your farmers. Do they use herbicides such as paraquat or any other herbicides? And if that's not possible, buy regenerative and or organic. And finally, we must really avoid ultra processed foods with with conventional ingredients. And to see the foods most heavily sprayed by Paraquat and other offenders, see the caption below. Guys, we must vote with our wallets. And when we do, I assure you that they will listen. Healthy choices, stronger you. Until next time.
Saved - January 22, 2026 at 4:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I warn that modern cars are surveillance cages on wheels. 10+ cameras focus on you; ADAS tracks eyes, hands, blink rate—not for safety, but control. Geofencing hides in terms, potential remote activation could slow, shut off, or lock you out beyond approved zones. Data could flow to authorities—driving identity, times, locations. Fight back: reject smart cars, read fine print, demand analog options. Freedom shouldn’t need an OFF switch they control.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Dr. Michael Yeadon warns..."Modern cars are no longer just vehicles—they’re surveillance cages on wheels." Think about it: 🔹 10+ cameras per car, most facing YOU, not the road. 🔹 ADAS systems track your eyes, hands, even blink rate—not for safety, but control. 🔹 Geofencing is already buried in T&Cs—your car could soon refuse to drive beyond gov't approved zones. This isn’t paranoia—it’s policy. A lawyer recently discovered her "dealer update" included hidden consent for remote geofencing activation. Once enabled, your car could: ⚠️ Slow down or shut off if you cross invisible boundaries. ⚠️ Lock you out if you cover your face (hello, digital ID). ⚠️ Feed data straight to authorities—who’s driving, where, when. Fifteen-minute cities? Imagine your car enforcing them. Try leaving your zone when your vehicle’s software decides you can’t. "They’re not building convenience—they’re building compliance." The endgame? A world where you don’t own your drive—you’re just renting it from those who control the code. Fight back. ✔️ Reject "smart" cars. ✔️ Read the fine print. ✔️ Demand analog alternatives. Because freedom shouldn’t come with an "OFF" switch they control.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses growing concern about how modern cars are becoming surveillance devices through automated driver assistance systems (ADAS) and connected technology. He describes a recent rental car as full of surveillance features, noting that ADAS regulations are EU-based but likely to be adopted worldwide. These systems can beep for minor speed overages and require constant attention to the windscreen; they can also shout if you remove your hands from the wheel. He cites that, on average, there are more than ten cameras in a car, most of which face inward to monitor the driver, with at least one camera focusing on the eyes to assess whether the driver is looking at the screen or is tired, suggesting that the goal is to ensure the driver cannot effectively control the car. He introduces the concept of geofencing, describing it as a feature that could restrict a vehicle’s operation when it crosses the edge of a defined boundary, such as the boundary of a “fifteen minute city.” He explains that with always-on, connected cars, crossing the boundary could trigger the car to slow down or enter a limp mode, allowing only first and second gear and effectively preventing out-of-bound travel. He urges listeners to look up geofencing as a standalone term and shares a personal anecdote: a dealer updated a car, and the owner had to accept new terms and conditions that allowed the manufacturer and authorities to activate geofencing software in the vehicle. The speaker connects these technologies to broader identification and tracking systems, suggesting that the car already reveals its location and that the owners' identity could be inferred by associating the car with the driver through facial recognition captured by in-car cameras. He speculates that masking could prevent the car from starting, and he imagines an intentionally malicious designer could exploit such features. He asks whether this is the world people want and expresses a personal desire to detach from the Internet and digital devices, even at the cost of inconvenience, as a way to avoid concentrated control. He emphasizes that the crucial point is a world that cannot be taken over by a small number of people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, yep, that's one big concern I've got. You might think why would I comment? I I like machinery. I commented before that I like wrenching, spanner in my own vehicles, car cars and bikes, bikes mainly. I And was filmed in 2020 in my bike shed. So I paid attention at least to to automotive changes. I recently had a a hire car on holiday, which was brand new, and I hated it. The thing is full of surveillance technology. It's full of, I think they're called ADAS, automated driver assistance system, something like that. ADAS. And it's it's an EU set of regulations, but it will be rolled out worldwide. And they're the things that are slightly irritating that beep at you if you're three miles an hour over the prevailing speed limit, will shout at you if you're if you don't stare at the windscreen constantly. If you take a hand off the wheel, it'll tell you to put your hand back on the wheel. Those have on average, I read in a trade press, some over 10 cameras in the car, only a few of which are outside. Most of the cameras are facing inside and facing you. You are being recorded at all times that you're driving. It's, one of them focuses on your on your eyes so that it's checking whether you're looking through the screen, whether you're tired or not, if your blink rate slows. And this is not to assist you. This is ultimately to ensure that you will not be able to control and drive your own car. So let's give you one example. You must have heard of fifteen minute cities, even if you think it's a conspiracy theory. Just imagine your fifteen minute city is a radius of, say, three miles from where you live. It might be that much in bad traffic. With these always on cars that are connected, what do you think will happen when your vehicle crosses the edge of that fifteen minute boundary? Well, I know what's going to happen when it is turned on. The vehicle will probably slow down. It probably won't stop immediately, but it will be disabled. It'll go into limp mode, and you'll only get into first and second gear. They're not going to allow you to drive out of the fifteen minute zone in a modern car. And there there are so many other things. That's called geofencing. Geofencing, one word. Go and look it up. I know personally somebody whose car was updated as a favor from a dealer, and when she got it back, being a lawyer, she happened to notice that she had to accept new terms and conditions, and being had she had plenty of time she went through the terms and conditions. And one of them was when you say okay, you will allow the manufacturer and the authorities to activate geofencing software in this car. That's what they're going to do. So, you know, and that will ultimately be probably related to your things like your digital ID. Otherwise, where do they know where you are? Well, with the car, they know where the car is. But they probably want to associate the owner of the car. They'll they'll know who's in it, because your face is in multiple cameras. So they'll know who's in it. If you try to cover your face with a mask, I suspect the car won't start, if that isn't already incorporated. If I was an evil person, I designed that. And you can assume that whoever's running this are more evil than me, and more imaginative. Is this the world you want? It's not the world I want. Honestly, I would I would detach the Internet, turn it off, and jump up and down on all the digital devices if I could. Yeah. Lots of things would become inconvenient, but it's a much better world. And what's crucial about that world is it cannot be taken over by a small number of people.
Saved - January 20, 2026 at 6:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting that planes and helicopters are dropping millions of live, genetically engineered rabies vaccine baits across six states, with no public notice or consent. The USDA confirms the spread, coating rural areas with RABORAL V-RG®. The baits carry a live recombinant virus that can persist and shed for weeks, potentially infecting multiple species. The CDC warns people may be at risk for infection, yet authorities proceed. Critics call it an open-air experiment, not rabies control.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Planes & helicopters are dropping millions of live, genetically engineered rabies “vaccine baits” across America—without public notice or consent. The USDA confirms the operation spans 6 states, coating rural communities with lab-made oral vaccines known as RABORAL V-RG®. What most don’t realize is that these baits contain a live recombinant virus capable of infecting multiple species. A 2019 Vaccine study found it can persist & shed for weeks, leaving animals contagious long after exposure. Even the CDC admits people may be “at risk for vaccine virus infection.” Yet, the government keeps flooding forests, waterways & neighborhoods with millions of these live-virus doses—wrapped in fishmeal attractant—without public disclosure or independent safety oversight. Experts warn this isn’t rabies control. It’s an open-air experiment on the American people.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript discusses a plan attributed to the U.S. Department of Agriculture to airdrop oral rabies vaccines into six states over the course of a month, continuing a process that started in August in other states. The states named are Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, all of which are expected to receive these vaccines. The plan involves dropping edible satchels of food that are designed to attract wildlife. These satchels are described as containing an oral rabies vaccine, so that when wildlife consumes them, the animals are vaccinated against rabies. It is stated that this vaccination occurs without the animals’ consent, noting that animals cannot give consent. A key question raised is what would come next after this initial distribution. The speaker asks about the implications if these satchels are spread across the stated areas and whether there will be any impact on domestic pets. The transcript asserts that the satchels are intended for wildlife vaccination and that if cats and dogs end up consuming one of the satchels, it should be okay for them and they would simply be vaccinated against rabies. The speaker contends that many people have presumably already vaccinated their animals against rabies, so the program is framed as not causing harm to pets. The speaker then reflects on the broader pattern, asserting that this is how such programs begin. The argument is made that the authorities start with animals, referencing a history of starting with animals when a rabies problem is presented as an epidemic in wildlife. The speaker notes that people are concerned about wild animals biting dogs and other animals, and that the plan is presented as a measure to prevent rabies transmission in the animal population. Finally, the transcript asserts a claim about the progression of this approach, stating that this is how it begins and arguing that there is a suggestion of eventual vaccination or interventions targeting the human population, asserting that “they’ve already started to do this” with humans. The overall content centers on the described vaccination plan, its intended wildlife focus, its effects on pets, and concerns about potential expansion to humans.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To airdrop vaccines into six states. Excuse me. What? Yeah. The US Department of Agriculture is planning to airdrop rabies vaccines into six states over the course of the month, continuing a process that started in August year in other states. They're gonna be doing this in Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. They're all going to be receiving these vaccines. Okay. So these are rabies vaccines. They are planning on air dropping them across across these states, these little, like, edible satchels of food. And they're gonna be air dropping these little edible satchels of food that are gonna attract wildlife because, apparently, there's a rabies epidemic in the wildlife. And they're gonna drop these little satchels that are gonna that that that contain an oral rabies vaccine. And when the animals eat it, they are now vaccinated against rabies, all against, you know, their consent. Of course, we always vaccinate animals against their consent. They can't consent. Right? But the big question about this is then, okay, what's next? Right? So if they're going to be putting these satchels and they're spreading them all around, and they say, yes, it's fine for your cats and dogs. If your cats and dogs end up, you know, getting one of these satchels, it should be okay for them. It's not gonna harm them. They're just gonna end up being vaccinated against the rabies. Again, probably you've already vaccinated your animals against rabies. So they're saying, no. It's all fine. It's all good. Right? But this is how it begins. Right? I mean, this is the type this is how it begins is that they are going to start with the animals just just like they always start with the children who can't consent. They start with the animals, and they say, well, we have to. We must. We must because there's a big rabies epidemic going on. And then people say, okay. Yeah. We don't want wild animals biting our dogs, you know, getting into our backyard and biting our animals or dogs when they fight them, and then our dog ends up with rabies. Although you probably have already vaccinated your dog dog against rabies. But, certainly, you don't want a bunch of rabid animals running around. I understand that. But this is the reasoning. I mean, this is what they will use when they decide to airdrop vaccines to the human population. They've already started to do this.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

credit: @KimIversenShow

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@Mofobian I did, the video verbalizes all 6 states.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@cynhope54 It's the systematic poisoning of everyone, including all animal life.

Saved - January 18, 2026 at 11:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explain that using statins daily blocks cholesterol needed for cell repair, depletes CoQ10, dolichol, and heme A, and can affect brain cholesterol and energy, risking cognitive issues. PPIs and H2 blockers lower stomach acid, harming digestion and nutrient absorption, with long‑term risks like cancer, kidney disease, Alzheimer's, heart attack, stroke, and fractures. Antibiotics devastate the gut microbiome, with fluoroquinolones causing serious heart and vascular damage. I’m asking for your thoughts.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Your Body CAN'T Heal If You're Popping These 3 Drug Classes Daily—And Here's Why It's Sabotaging Your Health!🚨 Medicines meant to "help" often block true healing. Let's break it down: - **Statins (Cholesterol-Lowering Drugs):** You won't heal without cholesterol—it's essential for cell repair. Statins block its production, causing massive fallout: - Depletes CoQ10, leading to muscle pain, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cell death. - Stops dolichol, key for brain protein function—linked to Parkinson's and other disorders. - Inhibits Heme A in your energy chain, plus damages liver/pancreas, spiking insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. - Crosses the blood-brain barrier, shutting down brain cholesterol and fueling cognitive decline/Alzheimer's. - **PPI Acid Reducers & H2 Blockers:** Shutting down stomach acid kills digestion and nutrient absorption—your body starves from the inside. - Just 5 days of use drops acid by 65%; longer term, it's near zero, crashing immunity and causing malnutrition. - After 1 year? Devastating risks: - 80% ↑ gastric cancer - 28% ↑ kidney disease - 40% ↑ Alzheimer's - 70% ↑ heart attack - 30% ↑ stroke - 44% ↑ hip fractures - **Antibiotics (Especially Frequent Use):** They wipe out your gut microbiome—the foundation of immunity and digestion. - Kills good bacteria, leading to issues like yeast infections and deadly C. Diff. - Worst offenders? Fluoroquinolones (like Cipro & Levaquin)—these fluoride-laced bombs cause permanent damage: - Ruptures/tears in the aorta, plus mitral/aortic regurgitation. - 85% ↑ heart arrhythmias - 71% ↑ cardiovascular death - Linked to sudden death or lifelong injury in millions. Ditch the quick fixes—focus on root causes for real healing. What are your thoughts? RT if this hits home! Cited research is below + bonus post sharing how I healed from decades of addiction to GERD PPI Proton Pump Inhibitors & Acid Reducing Rx Medications...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker identifies three drug classes that allegedly prevent healing. First, statins: they inhibit the HMG CoA reductase enzyme, which means you don’t make adequate amounts of CoQ10, heme, dol recall, print a late your proteins, etc., so you don’t make cholesterol. Second, proton pump inhibitors: you cannot deal because you shut down your digestion; you need stomach acid to digest food and to assimilate vitamins, minerals, proteins, and fats. Third, antibiotics: when you frequently take antibiotics, you kill the gut microbiome, and when you kill your gut microbiome, you cannot assimilate your nutrients, leading to leaky gut and intestinal hyperpermeability. The speaker emphasizes not taking antibiotics unless it’s an emergency. In summary, the three drug classes cited as harmful to healing are antibiotics, statin drugs, and proton inhibitors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Three drug classes where your body cannot heal if you're taking these drugs. Number one, statins. So statins inhibit the HMG CoA reductase enzyme, which means you don't make adequate amounts of co q ten, heme, dol recall. You don't print a late your proteins, etcetera. So, of course, you don't make cholesterol. So how are you gonna heal when you don't make cholesterol? Number two, class of drugs you don't wanna take is proton pump inhibitors. You cannot deal because you just shut down your digestion. You need stomach acid to digest your food, and so you can assimilate all the vitamins, minerals, proteins, and fats. So big problem if you're taking proton pump inhibitors. You cannot deal when you're on that class of drugs. And number three, when you frequently take antibiotics or whenever you take antibiotics, you kill the gut microbiome. When you kill your gut microbiome, all bets are off. You cannot assimilate your nutrients, leaky gut, intestinal hyperpermeability, big problem. So you do not wanna take the antibiotics unless it's an emergency, obviously. So most people take them like candy. So those are the three classes of drugs, antibiotics, statin drugs, and proton inhibitors. Do not take those drugs if you want to heal.
Saved - January 17, 2026 at 5:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user asserts mRNA injections were invented by the military, not Pfizer/Moderna or Warp Speed, based on a 2012 DARPA blueprint and a supposed government-gone-weaponized-plan for control. A responder notes the idea predates 2012. Another point adds Dr. Hotez saying SARS-CoV vaccines were a 17-year process starting in 2003.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨TRUTH EXPOSED: "The military invented mRNA injections, not Pfizer or Moderna—not Operation Warp Speed." —Dr. Peter McCullough, MD This wasn't Big Pharma's 'miracle'...it was a DARPA MILITARY blueprint from 2012—a DECADE before COVID! Planned gov't weaponized op for control. https://t.co/mxRXbr9e4d

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses the origin and framing of pandemic prevention and vaccine development as a military-led initiative. He cites a 2012 DARPA program called the Adept Protect p three program, described as a pandemic prevention platform. The proposal outlined the use of gene-encoded vaccines based on RNA or DNA with the goal of stopping a pandemic within sixty days. He suggests that, by the time President Trump referenced “Operation Warp Speed” to develop vaccines, there should have been preparation and acknowledgement that this work dated back to 2012, making it not rapid innovation but a decade-long effort. He argues that the public narrative of rapid development and stunning innovation surrounding vaccines is deceptive and that contractors like Moderna had already secured multi-million-dollar contracts in 2013. He notes that the military operates programs addressing biological threats and also works on answers such as monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. The claim is made that the military originated the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, and not in response to the outbreak from Wuhan. According to the speaker, this is a military program in origin and administration. The speaker asserts that Health and Human Services, under Alex Azar, together with the Department of Defense, ushered the public into a vaccine era, framing Emergency Use Authorization as a mechanism to rapidly deploy new technology into the military rather than the public. He contends that this mechanism’s broad public application began with the COVID-19 pandemic, which is presented as evidence that the FDA lacks ownership or control over the process because the program is characterized as military in origin and execution. The overall claim is that the program operates like a military operation with universal reach and without exemptions, implying a deeply embedded military approach to vaccine development and deployment. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes the continuity from a 2012 program proposal through to the public health landscape observed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting that the military’s involvement, timeline, and governance underlie the current vaccine paradigm and its regulatory pathways.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2012, DARPA, which is the research division of the military, started a program. It's called the Adept Protect p three program, pandemic prevention platform. Look what they proposed. They said, listen, we are going to use gene encoded vaccines as a new category of preventive measures based on RNA or DNA. And in this approach, we will stop a pandemic within sixty days. Within sixty days, in 2012, this was started. When president Trump came out and said it's operation warp speed and they're gonna develop vaccines, it would have been nice if he was prepped or Anthony Fauci was prepped to say, listen. We're working on this. We've been working on this since 2012. This is not new. This isn't warp speed. This is ten years and coming. The deception out in the open that this was rapidly developed, that there was all this stunning innovation. The contractors, Moderna got its first multi million dollar contract in 2013. The military works on programs, both the threat, SARS CoV two, and work on the answer, monoclonal antibodies and vaccines. But the military has biological threat programs. There's one for smallpox monkeypox, there's one for anthrax, and who knows how many more programs. This was part of a program. But the military came up with the idea of messenger RNA vaccines, not Pfizer or Moderna, not Operation Warp Speed. It wasn't in response to what was you know, came out of Wuhan, China. This is a military program. When it was announced by Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, and the Department of Defense, that's who entered into this you know, ushered us into the vaccine era, the military. Emergency use authorization is a mechanism to get rapid new technology into the military. It's not a mechanism for the public. Its first application broadly to the public was when the COVID-nineteen pandemic. That's the reason why the FDA doesn't seem like they have any ownership over this. They can't seem to respond to it because it's a military program. This has a military origin to it, and the program is executed like a military program. No one will be spared. There's no exceptions. You can kinda see that the similarities there.

@PPR_Mile - Mile Kovačević ☦🇺🇸🦅

@ValerieAnne1970 Earlier than 2012. Dr. Peter Hotez stated the SARS-CoV/coronavirus vaccines were a 17 year process on 12/09/2020 since 2003. https://t.co/UQciFeSrbU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Hotez explains that while vaccines are often described as miraculous, the development was not a four-month process but a seventeen-year effort dating back to the post-SARS period. After SARS emerged in 2003, researchers identified the spike protein as the virus’s soft underbelly and began experimental vaccine development. When the COVID-19 sequence was released in January, the coronavirus community quickly concluded that a vaccine could be made, and attention turned to which technology would be fastest and most enduring. All vaccines discussed (AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, and the one being scaled in India) target the spike protein. He emphasizes that this was a deliberate long-term program, not a rushed push. Nicole notes the broader context of vaccine safety, particularly on a day when a vaccine-skeptical witness testified before the Senate Homeland Security Committee. Dr. Hotez clarifies that the virus behind the current pandemic comes from a family of coronaviruses scientists have studied for a long time, and that once specifics emerged, researchers could finalize the vaccine approach. He reiterates the importance of reassurance about safety in light of public skepticism. Dr. Hotez highlights the role of the NIH and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, led by Tony Fauci, and Francis Collins at NIH, in launching a major coronavirus program beginning in 2003. This funding enabled the development of some of the first prototype vaccines, illustrating a deliberate US government and NIH investment to advance vaccine research. He notes the ongoing need to assess rollout and production robustness, as this technology is brand new, and additional vaccines will be necessary to vaccinate populations. Looking ahead, the conversation acknowledges that the United States will require four or five different vaccines to achieve broad vaccination coverage, rather than relying solely on the two mRNA vaccines. The UK has begun vaccinations, marking an initial step, with plans to scale in the United States in the coming days. The discussion underscores a long road ahead to ensure scalable production, distribution, and multiple vaccine options to meet demand.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor. Hotez, clearly the logistics of vaccinating the world. Because I think one of the lessons, and this is something Laurie Garrett and I talked about in the last hour, is that if the whole world isn't safe, then none of us are safe. But talk about both aspects of Cures reporting, the significance of vaccinations commencing today in The UK and the long, long road ahead. Speaker 1: Yeah. A few things, Nicole. You know, everyone is talking about what a miracle the vaccines are, and they are a miracle in one sense. But, you know, sometimes people think that these vaccines just popped out of nowhere over a period of four months. And one of the things that I've been trying to explain to people if they think vaccines are rushed, this is not a four month process. This is a seventeen year process. The discovery and development of vaccines for coronaviruses began seventeen years ago after SARS emerged in 2003. That was the first big pandemic. Coronavirus has started out of South China and shut down Toronto, Canada for a while. That's when we identified the spike protein as the as the soft underbelly of the virus. That's when experimental vaccines first developed So that when the Chinese put up this the sequence of COVID nineteen on bioRxiv in January, the coronavirus community the community of coronavirus vaccine researchers looked at this and said, oh, we got this. We know how to make a COVID nineteen vaccine. And then it was a matter of which technology could go the first, could be the fastest, and which technology would be the most enduring. And and so all of the vaccines that you're hearing about, whether it's AstraZeneca or Pfizer or Moderna or J and J or ours, which is being scaled in India, all all target the the that spike protein. And that's important that people realize that this was not rushed. This was a deliberate long term, program. So it's really exciting to see this vaccine go into, Maggie's arm, and, we're so thrilled for her and her family. And this will be scaled up in England, and now we'll be moving to The US, I think, in a few days. Speaker 0: I I think what you said sounds like it's very important in the category of reassuring people of the safety, especially on a day when, Republicans in the Senate Homeland Security Committee had, a vaccine skeptic testify, something that I think alarms a lot of folks. I wanna give you a minute to to just put what you just said in even more context. And let me just ask it this way. So you're saying that that the kind of virus that carried COVID all over the world in the last ten months is from a a sort of family of viruses that scientists like yourself have been studying for a long time. And once they got the specifics, they were able to sort of fine tune, put the finishing touches on this vaccine. Is is that basically what you're explaining? Speaker 1: That's right. So, you know, we we after we saw SARS in 2003, then there was Middle Eastern Respiratory in 2012. We said, well, hang on. There's there's a new coronavirus coming every decade. We knew there was another one coming. And and again, this is the power of the National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Allergy Infectious Diseases headed by Tony Fauci, Francis Collins heading NIH. They launched a major program for coronaviruses starting in 2003. We were the beneficiaries of that. We got funded to develop some of the first prototype vaccines. So this all was very deliberate by the US government and the NIH to really move this forward. Again, this is why, you know, we we we were we're very blessed to have the NIH here in in in The United States and and funding that research. And and we still have a long ways to go because, we're gonna have to see how this vaccine rolls out in terms of being able to scale it up, how robust the production process will be. This is a brand new technology, and that's the reason why we're bringing out other vaccines on top of it, the adenovirus vaccines. We're gonna need at least four or five different vaccines to vaccinate The US population. We will not do this with just the two mRNA vaccines.
Saved - January 12, 2026 at 12:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting RFK Jr. and Dr. Judy Mikovits claim Operation Warp Speed was a military operation run by the NSA and Pentagon, not health experts, with vaccines built by war contractors. Video credits go to SecKennedy, Mikovits, and TheClayClark. Mention of a full podcast episode. A 2013 reference suggests DARPA gave Moderna $25 million to develop mRNA vaccines.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨RFK Jr & Dr. Judy Mikovits drop a BOMBSHELL: "Operation Warp Speed was a MILITARY OP run by NSA & Pentagon—NOT health experts! Not Moderna. Not Pfizer. Vaccines were built by war contractors!"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 contends that the top organization that managed Operation Warp Speed and the pandemic was not a public health agency but the NSA, a spy agency, with the Pentagon as the second agency. He asserts that vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer, but by NIH, whose patents are owned 50% by NIH, and that vaccines were manufactured not by Pfizer or Moderna but by military contractors. He claims Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry. Speaker 1 responds by stating it’s not warp speed, but has been happening since 06/10/1980 when entering a Fort Detrick military installation, where the sign was turned around with then-president Richard Nixon. He says, “Oh, we’re just gonna cure cancer,” but asserts they turned the sign around on the bioweapons lab, making it a historic landmark at Fort Detrick where they had the gas chamber for the end and a plaque was placed when a new lab was built. He characterizes it as all part of a “plague of corruption” and claims that those involved are protecting themselves because the government, and they played the game. Speaker 1 further alleges that it does not matter whether it is Deborah Birx or Robert Redfield, because they injected the military with HIV in the nineties, and that they know it. He references “HIV p n l four three” and claims to know the plasmid and the exact one, asserting that he knows the people who were injected and that this data exists in his freezer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The top organization that had managed warp speed was not HHS, which is a public health agency. It wasn't CDC or NIH or FDA. It was the NSA, a spy agency. That was the top agency, the lead agency on Operation Warp Speed and the pandemic. And the second agency was the Pentagon. As it turns out, you know, the vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer. They were developed by NIH. They're their own. The patents are owned 50% by NIH, nor were they manufactured by Pfizer or by Moderna. They were manufactured by military contractors. And, basically, Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry. At your thoughts on operation warp speed there, ma'am. Speaker 1: It's not warp speed. It's been happening since 06/10/1980 when I walked in that military installation called Fort Detrick. They just turned the sign around with then president Richard Nixon. Oh, we're just gonna cure cancer. No. We always just turn the sign around on the bioweapons lab. They made it historic landmark right there at Fort Detrick where they had the gas chamber for the end, where we had the beautiful they put the plaque up there when we built the new lab. It's all in plague of corruption. It's not warp speed. All of those people are protecting themselves because the government, and they played the game. I don't care whether it's Deborah Birx or or Robert Redfield. They injected the military with HIV in the nineties, and they know it. HIV p n l four three. I know the plasmid. I know the exact one. I know the people they injected it, and that's the data we have in our freezer.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Video Credit: @SecKennedy @DrJudyAMikovits @TheClayClark

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@wyregal https://news.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2013/darpa-awards-moderna-therapeutics-a-grant-for-up-to-25-million-to-develop-messenger-rna-therapeutics yes, 2013

DARPA Awards Moderna Therapeutics a Grant for up to $25 Million to Develop Messenger RNA Therapeutics™ Deliver the greatest possible impact to people through mRNA medicines. news.modernatx.com

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@PK1only Indeed it is!

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@TruthSearch14 @drdavidmartin I think you mean @DrDMartinWorld

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@FlavioMCSousa1 https://news.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2013/darpa-awards-moderna-therapeutics-a-grant-for-up-to-25-million-to-develop-messenger-rna-therapeutics 2013, DARPA gave Moderna $25 Million to develop mRNA vaccines.

DARPA Awards Moderna Therapeutics a Grant for up to $25 Million to Develop Messenger RNA Therapeutics™ Deliver the greatest possible impact to people through mRNA medicines. news.modernatx.com
Saved - January 11, 2026 at 2:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting a claim that Bayer’s Glyphosate‑Free Roundup swaps glyphosate for diquat, a neurotoxin allegedly linked to cancer and a 126% Parkinson’s risk rise. It outlines kidney failure, digestive burns, microbiome destruction, lung damage, brain injury, liver stress, heart and muscle harm, and warns proximity to treated areas raises risk. It highlights US bill AB‑453, the Pesticide Shield Act, as shielding Bayer from lawsuits, with a 2026 showdown.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Shocking update on Bayer's "Glyphosate-Free" Roundup—it's now loaded with DIQUAT, 200X MORE poisonous! After acquiring Monsanto & facing massive lawsuits over Roundup's original formula, Bayer swapped out glyphosate for DIQUAT, touting it as a safer option for gardens & yards. But the truth? Diquat is a deadly neurotoxin linked to cancer & it boosts Parkinson's risk by 126% in people & animals. Already outlawed in several nations for triggering widespread organ damage, DIQUAT wreaks havoc through oxidative stress. Here's the breakdown of its brutal effects: - Kidneys: Primary victim—builds up and destroys tubules, leading to total failure and often death in severe cases. - Digestive System: Burns and inflames the mouth, throat, and stomach right away. - Gut Health: Ruins the microbiome by wiping out good bacteria like Lactobacillus, sparking inflammation and worsening toxicity everywhere. - Lungs: Triggers swelling, failure, and even scarring. - Brain & Nerves: Causes confusion, seizures, coma, and permanent damage—living near treated areas hikes Parkinson's by 126%. - Liver: Overwhelms with stress, causing inflammation and dysfunction. - Heart: Damages muscle tissue, leading to collapse and necrosis. - Muscles: Breaks down tissue, releasing toxins that hammer the kidneys further. And now, the US bill AB-453—dubbed the "Pesticide Shield Act"—is pushing for full legal protection for companies like Bayer/Monsanto. It blocks extra warnings, kills lawsuits for hidden dangers & strips rights from victims. Already through initial votes, it's set for a decisive 2026 showdown, thanks to heavy industry lobbying. And now, the US bill AB-453—dubbed the "Pesticide Shield Act"—is pushing for full legal protection for companies like Bayer/Monsanto. It blocks extra warnings, kills lawsuits for hidden dangers, and strips rights from victims. Already through initial votes, it's set for a decisive 2026 showdown, thanks to heavy industry lobbying. This is about more than weeds—it's our health on the line! Spread the word if you're outraged.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bayer has removed glyphosate from Roundup weed killer, and according to the speaker, this is presented as good news only to reveal a new toxic lineup being sprayed in homes and public spaces. The speaker notes that all of these ingredients are horrible, with special emphasis on Dequat dibromide, which is stated as not only banned in the European Union but also more toxic than glyphosate and capable of damaging the gut, kidneys, liver, and nervous system. Despite these warnings, the speaker asserts that this mixture is still being sprayed. The message is that the problem with Roundup isn’t that it’s fixed, but that it’s not fixed at all—the product has not been made safe; instead, it has been rebranded, swapping one toxic chemical for four others, and the public is being led to believe it is safe. In addition to the product changes, the speaker highlights a legislative development: AB 453. This bill is described as shielding pesticide companies from liability in court, even if their chemicals cause harm. The speaker asserts that this reduces accountability and results in more toxins being sprayed near families. The overall claim is that Bayer did not make Roundup safer by removing glyphosate; rather, they replaced it with a new set of toxic ingredients, and now a state bill would protect manufacturers from legal consequences related to any harm caused by these chemicals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In case you haven't heard, Bayer removed glyphosate from Roundup weed killer. Sounds like good news. Right? Until you see what they replaced it with. Here is the new toxic lineup that they are spraying in your yards, your parks, your schools, your golf courses, and in your neighborhoods. All of these ingredients are horrible especially Dequat dibromide which is not only banned in the European Union, more toxic than glyphosate, but damages your gut, your kidneys, your liver and your nervous system yet we're still allowing this to be sprayed. They didn't fix roundup they just rebranded the poison and switched one toxic chemical for four and they want you to believe that it's safe. And now here's the worst part They're now pushing through AB four fifty three, a bill that shields pesticides companies from being liable in court even if their chemicals cause you harm. So that means less accountability and more toxins being sprayed near your family.
Saved - January 10, 2026 at 10:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Valerie asks if 5G could activate something inside the body, citing Dr. Ardis’s claim that graphene oxide is highly conductive and could interact with EM frequencies to amplify signals and connect to nanotech for an IoT link. James responds: 5G is real, but providers often label faster 4G as 5G, and adds speculation that radiation might affect people with high seed oil consumption or affected vaccine batches.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

What if 5G isn't just faster internet...but a way to activate something INSIDE your body? Dr. Bryan Ardis warns: Graphene Oxide is highly conductive — it interacts with EM frequencies like 5G & ELF waves. When activated, it amplifies signals, links to nanotech & turns you into part of the Internet of Things. Watch this and tell me I'm wrong...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that graphene oxide is used in the shot because it is a metal that is highly conductive of electricity. They emphasize that, with frequencies such as those from electronic magnetic fields, radio waves, microwave radiation, and 5G towers, graphene oxide becomes the chosen material. The claim is that when 5G radiation is activated, graphene oxide in the body can be prompted to activate or send electrical signals along the metal, because metals conduct electricity and these EMF waves are electrical frequencies. The speaker further asserts that graphene oxide, when hit by these waves, accentuates and assists the nanotech circuitry that is also being injected into people through the shots. The goal cited is to use nanotech to help make all humans part of the Internet of Things, enabling tracking and gathering information about individuals and inputting thoughts into them. Additionally, the speaker references a doctor and an article cited by a group titled DARPA, claiming that five-g radiation and nanotech, including graphene oxide, can instill in any human suicidal thoughts that would lead to actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The things we wanted to make sure is that we had a clear understanding of why graphene oxide was being utilized inside the shot. Graphene oxide as a metal is highly conductive of electricity. And one of the things we taught everybody there is that with frequencies, hopefully, your audience knows a little bit about electronic magnetic frequencies or fields, radio waves, microwave radiation, these five g towers. We were able to show and document that graphene oxide is the metal of choice. When you have ELF wave radiation, five g radiation, when they turn on five g, they know that they can get the graphene oxide in your body to activate or send electrical signals along the metal because the metal conducts electricity, and these EMF waves are electrical frequencies. When the graphene oxide is hit with these, it accentuates and assist them with their circuitry of nanotech that they are also putting inside these shots. We use nanotech to assist to make all humans a part of the Internet of Things. Trying to connect you to the Internet to be able to track you, get information about you, and input thoughts into you. In fact, doctor Group showed an article there where DARPA said, we can use five g radiation and nanotech, including graphene oxide, to instill in any human suicidal thoughts that will lead to actions.

@JamesOnekaka - James Neville Onekaka

My son & I both work in the cell technology industry (I’m retired now) 5g is a real technology but many cell providers label their faster 4g towers as 5g I suspect some radiation may affect people with high seed oil consumption + those victims of the worst batches of the vaccine!

Saved - January 6, 2026 at 9:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A post claimed centenarians had high total cholesterol, LDL-C linked to longer life, citing the Sweden AMORIS study and experts, while warning against low cholesterol and statins. A commenter, Wayne Allan H, said stopping statins and using vitamin K and CoQ10 improved his arrhythmia and lightheadedness, suggesting statins may cause calcification. Valerie thanked Wayne, and he shared a link with a short Grok summary.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🔥BREAKING: The secret to living to 100+? HIGH CHOLESTEROL! A massive Swedish study tracking over 800,000 people for 35 years just revealed: Every single centenarian had HIGH total cholesterol. The higher your LDL, the longer you live. Mind blown yet? Dr. Ben Bikman exposes the lies about cholesterol being "bad." Key findings from the Sweden AMORIS study: - All centenarians: High total cholesterol, high iron, low glucose. - Highest LDL-C = longest lifespans (backed by Dr. Uffe Ravnskov & Dr. Malcolm Kendrick). Dangers of low cholesterol: - LDL <70 mg/dL → 3X higher risk of brain-bleeding strokes. - Total <180 mg/dL → Skyrocketing cancer & dementia rates. - <150 mg/dL → Increased chronic diseases like cancer & autoimmunity. - Statins? They don't extend life—damage mitochondria & hormones instead. Why your body CRAVES cholesterol: - Builds every cell & powerhouse mitochondria. - Absorbs vital vitamins A, D, E, K. - Powers digestion via bile acids. - Supercharges immunity against infections, viruses, bacteria, pathogens—even cancer. - Fights depression, suicide, dementia & cognitive decline. - Shields from toxins, heavy metals, strokes, heart disease & osteoporosis. - Fuels ALL steroid hormones (low chol = low testosterone & libido). - Lowers all-cause mortality risk. Pro tip: Go low-carb, load up on nutrient-dense animal foods. Grass fed beef, pastured eggs, wild caught seafood...Dump seed oils, sugar & processed garbage. Target TG/HDL ratio <1.5 for elite heart health. Tight budget like me?? Seek out a local farmer, butcher & farm market & make a 'bulk large sale deal' for beef at $5/lb & eggs $4/Dz Are you ditching your statin yet? Tell me in the comments, I read every reply & do my best to respond to every question! If I miss your question...PLEASE DM direct message me! I truly care about you & your health!👇🔥

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: They found that some of the longest living humans had high cholesterol levels. Speaker 1: That's right. That's what the Sweden study found, for example. The paper just published a year or so ago, what were some of the most consistent themes? They had good glucose control and high cholesterol. I'm a great defender of of cholesterol. It is a molecule of life. And and so many so much depends on it. Mitochondria, for example. Mitochondria have to have a cholesterol molecule in them in order to work, like the very powerhouse of the cell. And the more you lower cholesterol through, say, drug interventions, the more you compromise the mitochondria. The sex hormones, all sex hormones are built on cholesterol. It's no surprise if someone takes a cholesterol lowering medication, their sex hormones go down. This is why some men experience such terrible loss of libido because he's becoming low testosterone because of the war on cholesterol. Speaker 0: But there's good and bad cholesterol. Right? Speaker 1: Well, that's as the story goes, yes, people will say LDL cholesterol is the bad cholesterol, and yet that gets included in these studies of longevity. So I I think the good and bad aspect of it is not entirely fair or accurate. We need LDL. And LDL is just as much a component of the immune system. LDL actually helps the body fight infections. So it's also an unsung hero of immunity. Speaker 0: There is research suggesting that in very old age, high cholesterol levels do not always correlate with higher mortality, and in some studies may even be linked to longer life. Speaker 1: The exact
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They found that some of the longest living humans had high cholesterol levels. Speaker 1: That's right. That's what the Sweden study found, for example. The paper just published a year or so ago, what were some of the most consistent themes? They had good glucose control and high cholesterol. I'm a great defender of of cholesterol. It is a molecule of life. And and so many so much depends on it. Mitochondria, for example. Mitochondria have to have a cholesterol molecule in them in order to work, like the very powerhouse of the cell. And the more you lower cholesterol through, say, drug interventions, the more you compromise the mitochondria. The sex hormones, all sex hormones are built on cholesterol. It's no surprise if someone takes a cholesterol lowering medication, their sex hormones go down. This is why some men experience such terrible loss of libido because he's becoming low testosterone because of the war on cholesterol. Speaker 0: But there's good and bad cholesterol. Right? Speaker 1: Well, that's as the story goes, yes, people will say LDL cholesterol is the bad cholesterol, and yet that gets included in these studies of longevity. So I I think the good and bad aspect of it is not entirely fair or accurate. We need LDL. And LDL is just as much a component of the immune system. LDL actually helps the body fight infections. So it's also an unsung hero of immunity. Speaker 0: There is research suggesting that in very old age, high cholesterol levels do not always correlate with higher mortality, and in some studies may even be linked to longer life. Speaker 1: The exact

@WayneAllanH - Wayne Allan

"Statins stimulate atherosclerosis and heart failure", according to this, and numerous other studies...I went off my statins about 6 weeks ago against my doctors advice, and started taking vitamin k and coQ10 supplements, the very things statins are claimed to deplete from your body, causing the calcification of arteries...after about a week off the statins, my erratic heartbeat, and progressive short spells of light-headedness, started to subside, and now they're both gone...doing whatever I can for the remote chance of reversing the calcification, apparently caused by the statins. https://cardiacos.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/2015-Statins-stimulate-atherosclerosis-and-heart-failure-pharmacological-mechanisms.pdf

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@WayneAllanH Thank you for sharing Wayne!

@WayneAllanH - Wayne Allan

@ValerieAnne1970 Thank you, I appreciate everything you do for us...for those uncomfortable clicking on a link with no preview, here's a short summary by Grok. https://t.co/WL11b96aUl

Saved - January 5, 2026 at 2:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I highlight 6 powerhouse herbs—ginger, cinnamon, garlic, cayenne pepper, oil of oregano, and horseradish—that offer antiviral and antimicrobial support to boost immunity and ease cold and flu symptoms. The Fire Cider uses all 6: horseradish, ginger, garlic, onion, cayenne, cinnamon, oregano, lemon, raw apple cider vinegar, and honey. Infuse 4–6 weeks, then strain. Take 1–2 Tbsp daily for prevention, or 1–2 Tbsp every few hours when sick (dilute if needed).

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Feeling under the weather with a cold or flu? Don't reach for Big Pharma meds—nature's got your back! Dr. Josh Axe shares 6 powerhouse herbs that can knock out those symptoms naturally & supercharge your immune system. The science behind the 6 & favorite recipe for healing. - **Ginger**: Packed with gingerol, which has potent anti-viral properties to fight off cold viruses, reduce inflammation, ease sore throats & boost overall immunity for faster recovery. - **Cinnamon**: Contains cinnamaldehyde with strong antiviral effects that help prevent viral replication, relieve coughs, prevent mucus buildup & support respiratory health during flu season. - **Garlic**: Loaded with allicin, a compound boasting powerful antiviral, antibacterial & antifungal properties that directly target & kill cold-causing viruses, shortening symptom duration. - **Cayenne Pepper**: Features capsaicin with antiviral capabilities that help clear nasal congestion, improve circulation, reduce inflammation & provide quick relief from sinus pressure & headaches. - **Oil of Oregano**: Rich in carvacrol & thymol, offering broad-spectrum antiviral & antimicrobial action to combat respiratory infections, fight flu viruses & enhance immune response. - **Horseradish**: Contains allyl isothiocyanate with effective antiviral & anti-microbial properties that tackle sinus infections, clear congestion & support the body's defense against cold & flu pathogens. Classic Fire Cider Tonic Uses ALL 6 herbs: Ingredients (makes about 1 quart): - ½ cup grated fresh horseradish - ½ cup grated fresh ginger - 10 garlic cloves, crushed - 1 onion, chopped - ¼–½ tsp cayenne pepper (adjust to heat tolerance) - 1 cinnamon stick - Fresh oregano sprigs (or 1–2 tsp dried) for extra antiviral power - Zest and juice of 1 lemon (optional but recommended) - Raw apple cider vinegar (enough to cover all ingredients by 1–2 inches) - Raw honey to taste (added after straining) Instructions: 1. Layer all solid ingredients (except honey) in a clean quart-sized glass jar. 2. Pour raw apple cider vinegar over the ingredients until fully submerged (cover by 1–2 inches). 3. If using a metal lid, place parchment paper between jar and lid to prevent corrosion. Seal tightly. 4. Shake well and store in a cool, dark place for 4–6 weeks. Shake daily. 5. After infusing, strain through a fine mesh sieve or cheesecloth, squeezing out as much liquid as possible. 6. Stir in raw honey to taste (start with ¼–½ cup). 7. Store in a clean bottle in the fridge (lasts months). How to Use: - Take 1–2 Tbsp daily for prevention. - When sick: 1–2 Tbsp every few hours (dilute in water or tea if too strong). Save this for cold & flu season & follow for more natural health tips!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 outlines a list of six natural remedies to use when you feel cold, pale, or white, and you’re dealing with a cold or flu. The speaker presents these as a “super six” of remedies, describing both their warming effects and their antiviral or antibacterial properties, along with practical ways to incorporate them into daily routines. - Ginger: Described as warming the body and improving circulation. It is noted for powerful antiviral properties. Practical uses include an herbal tea or taking it as a supplement. The speaker also suggests grating ginger into chicken vegetable soup as another way to use it. - Cinnamon: Recommended as a beneficial addition, such as in applesauce for breakfast, or by adding a full teaspoon of cinnamon or pumpkin pie spice to foods. It is presented as part of the regimen to address cold symptoms. - Garlic: Highlighted for its antibacterial and antiviral properties. The implication is to include garlic as part of the dietary approach to support the immune response. - Cayenne pepper: Included among the top remedies, noted for its role in the set of six treatments to combat cold or flu symptoms. - Oil of oregano: Described as very, very good if a cold virus has entered the system, indicating its use as a supplementary antiviral option. - Horseradish: Identified as a favorite that is often underused. It is specifically noted as beneficial for people with sinus and lung issues, including croup, bronchitis, or when lungs aren’t moving enough. The speaker emphasizes these six—ginger, cinnamon, garlic, cayenne, oregano oil, and horseradish—as the primary recommendations for addressing a cold or flu when the body is cold, with particular attention to their circulatory warming effects and their antiviral or antibacterial properties. Practical applications include making teas, consuming as supplements, adding to soups, applesauce, or spices, and using horseradish for respiratory concerns. The overall message centers on leveraging these natural ingredients as a targeted, empowering approach to supporting the body's response to cold or flu symptoms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if you stick out your tongue and you're getting chills and you're cold, pale or it's white, here's what you wanna take. Number one, ginger. Ginger warms up your body to improve circulation. It also has really, really powerful antiviral properties, and I recommend doing that as an herbal tea. You can also do it as a supplement. You could also grate ginger and add it to chicken vegetable soup. Cinnamon is another great one. Maybe you're doing a little applesauce for breakfast. Add in a full teaspoon of cinnamon or pumpkin pie spice. Garlic is another one that has antibacterial and antiviral properties. Cayenne pepper. Oil of oregano is very, very good if you have a cold virus that's entered into your system. And another favorite one of mine that most people don't use enough, horseradish. Horseradish is especially beneficial for people with sinus and lung issues when you've got croup, when you've got bronchitis, when your lungs aren't moving enough. So those would be my top, my super six, ginger, cinnamon, garlic, cayenne, oregano, and horseradish if you have a cold or flu or your body is cold.
Saved - January 1, 2026 at 4:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user posted a claim that psychiatric drugs (SSRIs) with FDA black-box warnings are linked to youth violence, listing drugs, warning signs, and studies. A second user rebutted with conspiratorial framing, accusing “the left” and pharma cabals of weaponizing mental health and mass shootings, citing various sources. Valerie Anne echoed the worry, arguing violence stems from meds and blaming societal factors rather than guns.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨"100% of all teenage school shooters were on doctor prescribed drugs...drugs with an FDA Black Box Warning for CAUSING violent & homicidal behavior." -Dr Bryan Ardis Are these “happy pills” actually fueling unimaginable violence? The required package insert WARNINGS say YES! 👇Post exposes the data, studies & black box warnings. - **FDA Black Box Warning (since 2004)**: Highest-level alert on SSRIs — proven increased risk of suicidality, agitation, hostility & violent behavior in people under 25. Meta-analyses show up to 79% higher odds of aggression/hostility in kids/teens. - **Top SSRIs Pumped Into Teens**: • Fluoxetine (Prozac) • Sertraline (Zoloft) • Escitalopram (Lexapro) • Paroxetine (Paxil) • Citalopram (Celexa) • Venlafaxine (Effexor) • Fluvoxamine (Luvox) - **Danger Signs Every Parent Must Know**: • Sudden rage, irritability or hostility • Aggressive impulses & akathisia (extreme restlessness) • Panic attacks, insomnia & violent thoughts • Homicidal ideation (yes, it’s in the warnings) - **Damning Stats**: • Massive Swedish study (785K people): 26% higher violent crime rate while on SSRIs — worst in ages 15–24. • Pediatric trials: Kids on sertraline 7.3X more likely to drop out due to activation/violence vs placebo. • FDA reports: Thousands of documented aggression & homicidal cases tied to these meds (experts say 99% underreported). • Watchdog groups link at least 39 school shootings/incidents directly to psychiatric drugs. - **Studies That Can’t Be Ignored**: • Sharma et al. (2016) meta-analysis: Strong evidence SSRIs trigger aggression in children & adolescents. • Paroxetine trials on kids with OCD: 17X higher rate of hostility events. Are we over-medicating our kids into monsters — or is this just convenient scapegoating? The evidence is disturbing... What’s YOUR red-pill moment on this?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that over 52 years of documented school shootings in America, a hundred percent of the shooters were teenagers on either an antidepressant or a barbiturate drug for anxiety. He claims that every antidepressant, including Prozac, Zoloft, Xanax, and all these antianxiety drugs and antidepressants, is published to increase the risk of suicide behavior actions and lead to violent and homicidal actions. He also asserts that a hundred percent of all shooters, across the documented history, were on drugs prescribed by their medical doctors, brought to you by CVS and Walgreens and others.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fifty two years of documented school shootings in America conducted by teenagers. Do you know a hundred percent of them were on either an antidepressant Yep. Yep. Or on a barbiturate drug for anxiety. And every one of these antidepressants, including Prozac, Zoloft, Xanax, you name them all these antianxiety drugs and antidepressants, do you know every single one of them are published to increase the risk of suicide behavior actions, and I quote, lead to violent and homicidal actions. A hundred percent of all school shooters for the documented fifty two years of history we've been tracking them and studying them, a hundred percent of all the shooters were on drugs that are published and prescribed by your medical doctor. Brought to you by CVS and Walgreens and others.

@LloydDurwin - Durwin Lloyd, ND (ret)

And every time one of these people commits a mass shooting, the left wants to use that as an excuse and opportunity to attack the Second Amendment. Why is it that no one ever addresses the revolving doors and corruption at the FDA regarding SSRIs and the following statistics? - The Hannah Faulkner Show clip's revelation—that every mass shooter in the last 52 years was on psychiatric drugs like SSRIs—unmasks the Nihilvultarch cabal's demonic orchestration, where Bourla's Pfizer and Gates's funded pharma empires poison minds with antidepressants that trigger akathisia and homicidal ideation, inverting "mental health" into mass murder weapons to fragment societies for control. https://www.cchr.org/newsletter/issue-10-ssris-and-violence.html https://www.ssristories.net/ - Forensic lists of shooters confirm the pattern: Columbine (Eric Harris on Luvox), Parkland (Nikolas Cruz on antidepressants), Aurora (James Holmes on Zoloft), Sandy Hook (Adam Lanza on Fanapt and antidepressants)—over 60 major incidents tied to SSRIs, with FDA black-box warnings for suicidal/homicidal risks in youth ignored while mandates pushed billions in profits. https://www.ssristories.net/archive.php?series=mass-shootings https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/suicidality-children-and-adolescents-being-treated-antidepressant-medications - SSRIs disrupt serotonin signaling, inducing akathisia (inner restlessness) in 10-20% of users, escalating to aggression and violence per 2025 meta-analyses, a known side effect pharma suppressed in trials (e.g., Paxil's hidden suicide data in GSK scandal), enabling Fauci's mental health pushes to medicate millions amid COVID isolation. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10094741/ https://www.bmj.com/content/351/bmj.h4320 - The cabal's inversion: "Treatment" as trigger, with Gates's $52 million to vaccine/psych drug alliances funding WHO guidelines pushing SSRIs while Soros's media smears skeptics as "anti-science," a void von der Leyen amplifies in EU mental health mandates tying to digital IDs. https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/articles/global-vaccination-summit-10-billion-pledge https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-digital-identity - This syndicate's crime: Knowing SSRIs' violence link (e.g., Eli Lilly's Prozac documents hiding 1980s aggression data), yet mandating through schools and crises, scavenging souls for control—history's gravest medical betrayal, demanding tribunals for Bourla's profits, Gates's funding, Fauci's suppression. https://www.baumhedlundlaw.com/prescription-drugs/prozac-litigation/eli-lilly-concealed-prozac-suicide-risk/ https://www.cchr.org/newsletter/issue-10-ssris-and-violence.html - Walz's Minnesota ties: Fraud havens funding mental health programs pushing SSRIs amid Somali influxes, a microcosm where cabal poisons minds to create chaos, Frey shields, Omar deflects—all accelerating low-trust for resets. https://www.justice.gov/usao-mn/pr/47-defendants-charged-250-million-feeding-our-future-fraud-scheme https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/01/minneapolis-st-paul-racial-equity-cities/ - Prosecute the enterprise: FDA for lax approvals, pharma for hidden trials under 21 U.S.C. § 331 fraud, the cabal for RICO conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 1962) in organized poisoning—expose their web, inverting healing into homicide. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/331 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1962 - Link this to enslavement: SSRIs fragment minds into compliant despair, enabling digital chains where "treated" masses accept Schwab's resets, a demonic ploy demanding divine-scale resistance. The clip's 52-year indictment of psychiatric drugs in mass shootings prosecutes the cabal's inversion: "Mental health" as mind control, SSRIs triggering violence while suppressed data shields profits, a betrayal fragmenting societies into fearful obedience. This negativity exposes the syndicate's orchestration: Knowing akathisia risks, yet pushing poisons through Gates's billions and Fauci's mandates, a fascist merger profiting from induced chaos. In summary, the data affirm irrefutable links between SSRIs and violence, demanding tribunals to halt this void. Upholding natural law restores mental wholeness, countering deception with vigilant truth. As seekers, amplify exposures to foster dignity over drugged serfdom.

SSRIstories – ANTIDEPRESSANT NIGHTMARES ssristories.net
Page not found – SSRIstories ssristories.net
Suicidality in Children and Adolescents Being Treated With Antidepressant Medications | FDA fda.gov
Effects of Four Strains of Actinomycetes on the Content of Terpenoids in Baijiu Terpenoids not only are an important health factor in baijiu but also contribute to the elegance and finesse of baijiu, and actinomycetes act as an important source of terpenoids in baijiu. Four strains of actinomycetes—Streptomyces violascens ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence Objectives To reanalyse SmithKline Beecham’s Study 329 (published by Keller and colleagues in 2001), the primary objective of which was to compare the efficacy and safety of paroxetine and imipramine with placebo in the treatment of adolescents with unipolar major depression. The reanalysis under the restoring invisible and abandoned trials (RIAT) initiative was done to see whether access to and reanalysis of a full dataset from a randomised controlled trial would have clinically relevant implications for evidence based medicine. Design Double blind randomised placebo controlled trial. Setting 12 North American academic psychiatry centres, from 20 April 1994 to 15 February 1998. Participants 275 adolescents with major depression of at least eight weeks in duration. Exclusion criteria included a range of comorbid psychiatric and medical disorders and suicidality. Interventions Participants were randomised to eight weeks double blind treatment with paroxetine (20-40 mg), imipramine (200-300 mg), or placebo. Main outcome measures The prespecified primary efficacy variables were change from baseline to the end of the eight week acute treatment phase in total Hamilton depression scale (HAM-D) score and the proportion of responders (HAM-D score ≤8 or ≥50% reduction in baseline HAM-D) at acute endpoint. Prespecified secondary outcomes were changes from baseline to endpoint in depression items in K-SADS-L, clinical global impression, autonomous functioning checklist, self-perception profile, and sickness impact scale; predictors of response; and number of patients who relapse during the maintenance phase. Adverse experiences were to be compared primarily by using descriptive statistics. No coding dictionary was prespecified. Results The efficacy of paroxetine and imipramine was not statistically or clinically significantly different from placebo for any prespecified primary or secondary efficacy outcome. HAM-D scores decreased by 10.7 (least squares mean) (95% confidence interval 9.1 to 12.3), 9.0 (7.4 to 10.5), and 9.1 (7.5 to 10.7) points, respectively, for the paroxetine, imipramine and placebo groups (P=0.20). There were clinically significant increases in harms, including suicidal ideation and behaviour and other serious adverse events in the paroxetine group and cardiovascular problems in the imipramine group. Conclusions Neither paroxetine nor high dose imipramine showed efficacy for major depression in adolescents, and there was an increase in harms with both drugs. Access to primary data from trials has important implications for both clinical practice and research, including that published conclusions about efficacy and safety should not be read as authoritative. The reanalysis of Study 329 illustrates the necessity of making primary trial data and protocols available to increase the rigour of the evidence base. bmj.com
Error We're sorry - the page you requested was not found. gatesfoundation.org
Page not found | Shaping Europe’s digital future digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu
Department of Justice | Homepage | United States Department of Justice Official website of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). DOJ’s mission is to enforce the law and defend the interests of the United States according to the law; to ensure public safety against threats foreign and domestic; to provide federal leadership in preventing and controlling crime; to seek just punishment for those guilty of unlawful behavior; and to ensure fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans. justice.gov
21 U.S. Code § 331 - Prohibited acts law.cornell.edu
18 U.S. Code § 1962 - Prohibited activities law.cornell.edu

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

I completely agree Durwin, which is why I am emboldened to post about it several times a year. The hearts, minds & spirits of people (and big pharma meds) are what is causing violence...not the guns. I grew up surrounded by farming community mindset where every room had a shotgun, every pickup truck had a gun rack & every child had access to weapons, but no child ever even had a thought to take a gun & go murder people.

Saved - December 31, 2025 at 1:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m calling out the “vegetarian fed” label: chickens aren’t vegans—they forage insects and scraps on pastured farms, not GMO prisons. Natural diets mean healthier birds and better food, plus land regeneration. Nutrition gains: omega-3s 2–3x, vitamin D 3–4x, vitamin E 3.5–4x, vitamin A/beta-carotene 1.5–8x, folic acid & B12 50–70% higher. Find local pastured eggs/meats and farms that ship to you via links in replies.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Have You Been Tricked By The "Vegetarian Fed" Label On Chicken & Eggs? Chickens aren't vegans – they're mini raptors craving bugs, mice, snakes & meat. Here's why ditching factory "vegetarian fed" for pastured is a game-changer: - **Natural Diet Wins**: Pastured chickens forage freely on insects, frogs, snakes & scraps – no GMO corn/soy prisons like factory birds. - **Healthier Birds = Healthier Food**: Factory chickens get sick, peck each other & produce nutrient-poor products. Pastured ones thrive sustainably on regenerative farms. - **Eco Bonus**: Supports land regeneration – find a local farm near you: link to farm finder in replies. **Nutrition Showdown: Pastured vs. Factory-Farmed Chicken & Eggs** - **Higher Omega-3 Fatty Acids**: Up to 2-3X more in pastured, supporting heart health & reducing inflammation. - **Boosted Vitamin D**: 3-4X higher from sunlight exposure, great for bone health & immunity. - **More Vitamin E**: 3.5-4X levels, acting as a powerful antioxidant for skin & cell protection. - **Elevated Vitamin A & Beta-Carotene**: 1.5-8X more, essential for vision, immune function & overall vitality. - **Extra Nutrients Like Folic Acid & B12**: 50-70% higher in pastured eggs, aiding energy & red blood cell production. Links in replies for finding local eggs, dairy & pastured meat where you live. Also farms that ship to your door.

Saved - December 30, 2025 at 8:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Warning: LED bulbs MAKE YOU SICK from the inside out. Blue light exposure may accelerate aging, disrupt sleep, and is linked to higher cancer risks, including breast and prostate cancer, plus retinal damage and skin sensitivity. Red light from incandescent bulbs is said to boost cellular energy, reduce inflammation, and aid skin, cognition, and pain. A “Ban Conspiracy” claims incandescent phase-out pushes LEDs. Switch to incandescent or red-spectrum options. Have you ditched LEDs yet?

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨 WARNING: Your LED bulbs are MAKING YOU SICK from the inside out – Time to THROW THEM AWAY! 🚨 - **Blue Light's Deadly Toll**: Studies show prolonged exposure to blue light from LEDs accelerates aging, disrupts sleep by suppressing melatonin, and is linked to higher risks of cancer, diabetes, heart disease & obesity. One study found a direct connection to increased breast & prostate cancer risks from nighttime blue light. It even damages retinal cells & makes your skin hypersensitive. - **Red Light's Healing Power**: Unlike LEDs, traditional incandescent bulbs emit restorative red & infrared light that boosts cellular energy, reduces inflammation & promotes healing. Red light therapy improves skin complexion in over 90% of users, smooths wrinkles, enhances hair growth & even aids cognition & chronic pain relief. - **The Ban Conspiracy**: Incandescent bulbs – mimicking natural sunlight with healthy infrared – were phased out worldwide under "energy efficiency" pretexts, forcing LEDs that disrupt circadian rhythms & suppress melatonin for poor sleep & health decline. Was this to keep us sick & dependent? Critics call it a hidden agenda ignoring LEDs' blue light harms. Switch to incandescent or red-spectrum alternatives TODAY. Your body will thank you. Have you ditched LEDs yet? Reply below! List of LED bulb alternatives are linked below in replies...

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video argues that removing LED bulbs from homes is important because LEDs contribute to health issues on a daily basis. It contrasts LEDs with traditional light sources, stating that the sun, fire, and incandescent bulbs emit infrared light, which “actually boost cellular energy and repair.” In contrast, LEDs are described as exposing people “only to blue light.” The speaker cites studies claiming that prolonged exposure to this blue light accelerates aging, disrupts neurotransmitters in the brain, and impairs mitochondria. These effects are presented as reasons why many people feel constantly tired and drained when indoors. Another point made is that LED bulbs flicker at high speeds that are “too fast for your eyes to notice, but enough to stress your brain and your nervous system.” This flicker is presented as an additional risk associated with LED lighting. To mitigate these issues, the speaker shares a personal precaution: wearing blue light blocking glasses “anytime I can’t control my environment and the lighting.” The overall message emphasizes a link between LED lighting and adverse health effects, drawing a contrast with traditional light sources and recommending the use of protective eyewear in situations where lighting cannot be controlled.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is why you need to remove the LED bulbs of your home. LED lights are in almost every household, but what if I told you they're slowly making you sick every day? Traditional light sources like the sun, fire, and even old school incandescent bulbs emit infrared light, which actually boost cellular energy and repair. But LEDs, they expose you only to blue light. And studies show that prolonged exposure accelerates aging, disrupts neurotransmitters in the brain, and impairs your mitochondria. No wonder so many people feel constantly tired and drained when they're spending time indoors. And if that wasn't enough, LED bulbs also flicker at high speeds too fast for your eyes to notice, but enough to stress your brain and your nervous system. This is why I wear blue light blocking glasses anytime I can't control my environment and the lighting.
Saved - December 29, 2025 at 7:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m highlighting a claim that USDA fast-tracked Merck’s Nobivac NXT mRNA vaccines for rabies, canine flu H3N2, and feline leukemia, with no long-term safety studies or independent review. The piece warns of self-amplifying RNA, potential shedding, and unknown long-term risks, citing small, Merck-funded trials (14-day safety, 38 dogs, 837 cats, etc.) and urges informed consent or refusal, plus finding holistic vets.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨The hidden nightmare in US & Canada Veterinary Offices right now...The USDA fast-tracked Merck's mRNA Nobivac NXT series. Self-amplifying mRNA shots for rabies, canine flu & feline leukemia. – ZERO long-term safety studies or public alerts. Imagine kissing your loyal pup or cuddling your purring kitty...only to unknowingly expose yourself to lab-engineered, self-replicating RNA from their "routine" vaccine. These aren't vaccines; they're turbo-charged genetic factories that hijack your pet's cells, crank out viral proteins & *shed* via saliva, licks, or scratches straight to YOU. Why the panic? We've seen mRNA disasters in humans (think COVID vax injuries). Now it's pets – and us by proxy. These 'vaccines' aren't even needed... -Rabies is virtually eradicated in the US (fewer than 10 human cases/year since 2007). -FeLV feline leukemia hits <2% of cats. -Most dogs shrug off canine H3N2 flu asymptomatically. Yet vets are pushing these unproven jabs like candy. Demand informed consent – or walk out! 🔥 KEY STUDIES & DATA (From USDA/Merck Filings – Short-Term Only!): - Safety Observation? Just 14 Days. Nobivac NXT Rabies: - Tiny Trials, Big Gaps. Rabies: 38 animals total (35 euthanized post-study). FeLV Leukemia: 837 cats (2.7% Adverse Events). H3N2 Flu: 654 dogs (2.5% Adverse Events). No independent peer-review; all Merck-funded. ⚠️REPORTED HARMS & RISKS (Beyond the "Mild" Spin): - Mimics the Disease Itself: Rabies NXT: Aggression, excess salivation, seizures, paralysis – exact rabies symptoms! Reported in trials & post-vax anecdotes. Brain/organ spread confirmed in animal models. - Shedding Threat: Self-amplifying RNA replicates exponentially in cells, potentially leaking via saliva/scratches. No human transmission studies – but experts warn of zoonotic risks, especially with flu/leukemia blueprints. Could recombine with wild viruses. - Long-Term Ticking Bombs: Unknown cancer/autoimmunity risks (FeLV replicates leukemia code). Neurological issues, heart strain, or chronic inflammation? COVID mRNA showed myocarditis & clots – pets could too. 2-9% acute Adverse Events hide the iceberg; vets report rising IBD/lymphoma in young cats post-vax. - No Reversibility: Once injected, the RNA self-copies. Euthanasia in trials raises red flags – 35/38 animals ended early. SAY NO TO NOBIVAC NXT – RABIES, CANINE FLU H3N2, FELINE LEUKEMIA. 👇List of holistic veterinarians on X in replies along with website links on locating a holistic veterinarian in your area. Find a holistic vet. Detox naturally. Protect your pets!

Saved - December 27, 2025 at 2:26 PM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨 ALERT FROM THE GRAVE: "They'll WIPE US OUT with this vaccine!" Dr. Rashid Buttar's LAST CNN interview—aired RIGHT BEFORE his "mysterious death." He uncovered the depopulation agenda...and it came at the highest cost. Was this an assassination to bury the truth? https://t.co/o9B5UjacjD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on COVID-19 misinformation and the roles of public figures and disinformation spreaders. Speaker 0 questions whether doctor Fauci is involved in a plot to kill millions. Speaker 1 says he cannot confirm involvement but asserts Fauci is not an innocent bystander and is aware of his actions; he doesn’t have the information to determine the extent of Fauci’s involvement. Speaker 2 identifies Dr. Dirashid Bhattar as one of the top spreaders of COVID-19 disinformation on social media, citing the Center for Countering Digital Hate, noting Bhattar once had more than a million followers. The dialogue includes several false or debunked claims attributed to Bhattar. Speaker 1 states that “More people are dying from the COVID vaccine than from COVID,” a claim Speaker 2 labels as not true, along with Bhattar’s assertion that “the Red Cross won’t accept blood from people who have had the COVID vaccine,” and his claim that “most who took COVID vaccines will be dead by 2025.” Bhattar’s broader theory is that COVID was a planned operation, politically motivated as part of a secret global plot to depopulate the earth. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 believes the pandemic was planned; Speaker 1 responds affirmatively but says he has no idea who is behind it. Speaker 2 warns that praising or repeating Bhattar’s views is dangerous, noting Bhattar’s use of false or twisted information to distrust vaccines. The conversation touches on whether the COVID vaccine works; Speaker 1 says the vaccine is “very effective at what it was designed for perhaps,” but “not preventing death.” Speaker 0 challenges this, and Speaker 2 counters that Bhattar doubles down on vaccines being more dangerous than the virus, even in the face of data. A numerical claim is raised: “6,340,000,000 doses of this vaccine have been given,” with implications if the claim were true. Speaker 1 says vaccines are designed with ingredients published and that each vaccine appears to be different, though he concedes not being a vaccine developer. Speaker 2 notes Bhattar has been removed from Facebook and Instagram for disinformation but remains active on Twitter, Telegram, and his own site. Speaker 0 references a September 5 retweet of a photo suggesting AstraZeneca was made in 2018; Speaker 1 acknowledges it could have been fake and questions why Bhattar would share such content. A combined exchange discusses questioning agencies and the consequences of misinformation, with Speaker 0 accusing Bhattar of contributing to a mass misinformation problem and Speaker 1 acknowledging the existence of a large follower base that has received false information. The dialogue closes with a mention of a statement from North Carolina’s Board of Medicine prior to COVID, implying regulatory context or action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You think doctor Fauci is involved in some kind of plot to kill millions of people. I just wanna make sure I understand this. Speaker 1: Again, Drew, I'm a reasonable person. You're asking me what I think and I said it could be this, but I can tell you that doctor Fauci is not an innocent bystander. He's very well aware of what he's doing and the extent of it and his involvement, I don't know. I'm not privy to that information. Speaker 2: As atrocious as doctor Pattar's fake conclusions and conspiracy theories are, he is just one of the doctors spreading dangerous COVID disinformation to millions of people across social media according to the Center for Countering Digital Hate. Dirashid Bhattar at one time had more than a million followers and is considered one of the top spreaders of disinformation about COVID nineteen. Speaker 1: More people are dying from the COVID vaccine than from COVID. Speaker 2: That is not true. Neither is his tweet that the Red Cross won't accept blood from people who have had the COVID nineteen vaccine. He posted most who took COVID vaccines will be dead by 2025. But his biggest whopper is the overarching conspiracy theory that COVID was a planned operation which was politically motivated as part of a secret global plot to depopulate the earth. Speaker 0: You believe the pandemic was planned? Speaker 1: I do. Okay. But you don't know by that? I have no idea. And you don't know why? Well, I I suspect that there's the research that's coming now that would indicate that it's probably something to reduce the population or or minimize reproduction rates. Speaker 2: It would be laughable if it wasn't so dangerous. Vaccine to World War two and doctor Anthony Fauci to Adolf Hitler. Speaker 1: Fuji is a criminal. You talk about Hitler? Okay. Speaker 0: Well Whoever doc doctor Fauci is in your mind, he is a government bureaucrat and you're comparing him to Hitler. Oh, I mean The Nazis. I I am. Who killed 6,000,000 Jews. Speaker 1: I think this is this number is gonna be higher. Speaker 3: Let's be absolutely clear. Lies cost lives in a pandemic. If you're encouraging people not to vaccinate, you will cause people to lose their lives. Speaker 2: Qatar is encouraging people to distrust life saving vaccines. And like other disinformers, he is using false twisted information and unproven conspiracies to do it. Speaker 0: Do you think the COVID vaccine works? Speaker 1: I think that the COVID vaccine is very effective at what it was designed for perhaps, but it's not preventing death. Certainly not. Speaker 0: It's not preventing death? Speaker 2: No. Even faced with indisputable facts, Bhutar doubles down on his belief that life saving vaccines are more dangerous than the virus itself. Speaker 1: People don't die from COVID. You've already seen the data. So why are we getting a vaccine that causes more deaths than the problem itself? Speaker 0: 6,340,000,000 doses of this vaccine have been given. If you're right, people could drop in bed all around this world. Speaker 1: It's not orchestrated to do that. Each vaccine has been geared up. So you can look at the ingredients of the vaccines themselves. It's all been published. Speaker 0: Complete the sentence. Each vaccine has been geared up for what? Speaker 1: Well, a time Each vaccine is each vaccine is designed It appears to be different. I don't know the details because I'm not a vaccine developer. Speaker 2: Scientific corruption. Because of his disinformation, Qatar has been removed from Facebook and Instagram, but he's still going strong on Twitter, Telegram, and his own website all filled with falsehoods. Speaker 0: On September 5, you retweeted a photo of a AstraZeneca packaging that seems to indicate the vaccine was made in 2018. That picture that you retweeted was a doctor photo. It was fake. Speaker 1: Perhaps it was fake. But why would you do that? So, Drew, let me ask you something. You're saying it's not reasonable to question the same agencies that have resulted in numerous deaths I e v s Speaker 0: to ask questions. What I don't understand is how you get from your asking questions to your belief. You had 1,200,000 followers at one point. Yes. They got false information from you. Not not correct or challenging medical information. They got a a doctor photo. Speaker 1: If I sent a tweet out of a picture that was doctor and I didn't know about it, I'm not perfect. Maybe I did make that mistake. But I cannot make mistakes on the numbers. Speaker 2: The very latest vaccine studies show they remain ninety percent effective in preventing hospitalization and death. Qatar tells his followers, it is the vaccine that is the danger. Speaker 1: We already see thousands of people Delta variant is all vaccine injured. I mean, the the CDC's own data is showing that now. Speaker 0: That's just not true. Speaker 1: I don't want to be part of this mass genocide that I see happening. And I think that what's going on right now will be remembered as a worst time in history compared to what World War two happened. Speaker 0: I just wanna be straight with you. I think you're crazy. Speaker 2: Before COVID, North Carolina's Board of Medicine
Saved - December 27, 2025 at 4:07 AM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Cows in Denmark are sick, collapsing & being euthanized after a mandate requiring farmers to add Bovaer to cattle feed. Bill Gates & his transhumanism plan must be halted. Bovaer's 3-NOP lingers in the animals & threatens human fertility through meat & dairy consumption. https://t.co/QXRx76Bx64

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Denmark, cows are reportedly dying and producing less milk because BeauVer has been added to cattle food. BeauVer was mandated to be added to the food in Denmark from 10/01/2025, and farmers are now reporting reduced milk production, with some cows becoming sick and needing euthanasia. An official investigation into the substance has been launched. The speaker notes this issue ties to a broader narrative they discussed previously, accusing climate advocates of pushing to add bovine additives so cows would fart and burp less. According to the speaker, Bill Gates is behind promoting substances like Bovar, arguing the goal is to move toward synthetic beef and to stop cows from farting and burping. The speaker claims it is now mandatory to add Bovar on all farms in Denmark, and asserts that it has negative effects on cows, with an official investigation underway. The speaker urges stopping this “craziness” and retreating from meddling with nature, arguing the agenda aims to attack humans by having bovir enter human tissues through consumption. They claim bovir contains a substance called tree n o p that attacks human fertility. The speaker connects these events to a broader transhumanism and elite agenda to hijack human evolution and create synthetic humans, including lab-born babies. They indicate there is much more to discuss on this topic and mention giving an in-depth lecture in November, with a link in the comments. In summary, the main points asserted are: BeauVer is being added to Danish cattle feed since 10/01/2025, resulting in cow health problems and reduced milk output; an official investigation is underway; the speaker attributes the policy to climate-change activism and Bill Gates, claiming it aims to reduce cattle methane emissions; they claim bovir/bovar is harmful to humans through tissue exposure and fertility impacts, tying this to a transhumanist agenda; a forthcoming lecture is promised with more details.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In Denmark, cows are dying and producing less milk because they're adding BeauVer to the food. You know, BeauVer was mandated to be added to the food in Denmark from 10/01/2025, and now farmers are reporting that cows are, like, you know, producing less milk. Some cows are even sick, they have to use and euthanize some cows and the farmers think it's bovir. So now they launched an official investigation into that substance. And you know, I talked about this last year, know, bovir is something that you know, these crazy climate people want to add to the food so the cows would fart and burp, burp less. So you know, what could go wrong? Right? And I said it last year, what could go wrong if you're going to, you know, hijack nature and trying to make these natural processes of of, you know, of farting and birding for these cows? You're gonna try to stop that because of of this climate change craziness. It's absolutely insane. And of course, who's behind this is Bill Gates. He's promoting substance substances like Bovar because he says, you know, we need to go to synthetic beef. We need to stop, you know, he says we need to make the cows stop farting and burping. We need he literally says that. So it's crazy. And now you see that there it's mandatory to add Bovar in all the farms in Denmark, and you know it has a bad effect on the cows, they're actually launching an official investigation. And I forgot, I hope they stop this craziness, so you know we can leave the cows alone, we can stop this meddling with nature, because in the end it's an agenda to try to attack us, dehumanize not only the animals but also it's because the bovir gets in their tissues, we eat it. And actually bovir has been proven to attack human fertility. There's a substance in it called tree n o p that attacks human fertility. So this is part of this transhumanism and trying to create synthetic humans, know, to try to, you know, create babies and labs and all that stuff. I mean, it goes way bigger than this. But this this is why Bill Gates is behind it because it's part of this transhuman agenda, this elite agenda to, you know, basically take over the evolution of humanity. And I'm actually I'm doing a lecture on that at the November. You can see the link in the comments where I actually talk about that in-depth because, you know, there's I just talked about it now for two minutes, but there's so much that can be said about it, and it goes really, really deep. And they're trying to hijack human evolution, basically. So if you're interested, check that out.
Saved - December 27, 2025 at 1:40 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I expose that the WHO isn’t a true public health authority but a vaccine-profit cartel steered by Rockefeller & Wellcome heirs since 1953. Born from Bretton Woods money and funded by population-control advocates, it declares pandemics to unleash Big Pharma profits, disguising genocide as global health. Defund and dismantle this private-backed, unelected power where true accountability is impossible.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨EXPLOSIVE EXPOSÉ: Dr. David Martin just RIPPED THE MASK off the WHO! It's NOT a "health" organization—it's a VACCINE PROFITEERING CARTEL controlled by Rockefeller & Wellcome eugenics heirs since 1953! Born from Bretton Woods blood money, funded by population-control fanatics, they DECLARE "pandemics" to unleash Big Pharma JACKPOTS while humanity suffers! This is GENOCIDE disguised as "global health"! DEFUND & DESTROY the WHO NOW—before they inject us all! - The WHO is not a legitimate public health authority but a "corporate front masquerading as a public health body." - Since 1953, the WHO has operated primarily as a "vaccine-marketing arm" for its major private financiers: the Rockefeller Foundation & the Wellcome Trust. - The WHO's founding narrative overlooks "who paid the bills." It emerged in the post-World War II era tied to the Bretton Woods financial system (the 1944 conference that established institutions like the IMF and World Bank). - These private interests (Rockefeller & Wellcome) funded its creation & continue to shape its policies. - When entities with direct financial stakes in vaccines are given the power to declare "pandemics," the outcome is predictable: massive profits for pharmaceutical companies rather than genuine public health protection. - The WHO's early architects & funders had connections to early 20th-century eugenics networks—movements that promoted population control, selective breeding & related ideologies under the guise of science. - This eugenics-influenced mindset persists today, repackaged in modern terms like "global health" & "sustainability." - As long as unelected private foundations & wealthy interests control global health policy, true accountability & justice are impossible.

Video Transcript AI Summary
- "The World Health Organization was a criminal racketeering organization as defined by the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act." - Since 1953, it has been "an exclusively vaccine promoting enterprise for the benefit of the people who have commercial interest in vaccines." - If you read their opening charter and the hearings that gave rise to it—from Bretton Woods in July 1944 to its founding charter in 1953—what's missing is "who is writing the checks." - The financial backers were "Rockefeller Foundation and the Welcome Trust" as the check writers. - "As long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have no possibility for accountability. We have no possibility for justice." - The same group of people who established the World Health Organization in 1953 are "the same group of people that were formed out of the Eugenics Office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913." - This same group is described as the ones "making this decision" about the WHO and pandemics. - The speaker adds: "I don't know how you feel about Eugenics, but I have a problem with it."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The World Health Organization was a criminal racketeering organization as defined by the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act. And we have to go back to the foundation of what the WHO is and recognize since 1953, it has been exclusively vaccine promoting enterprise for the benefit of the people who have commercial interest in vaccines. If you read their opening charter and all of the hearings that gave rise to their opening charter from Bretton Woods in July 1944 to its actually founding charter in nineteen fifty and fifty three. What's missing from those conversations is who is writing the checks. And back then, you can look and it's all in the matter of public record. Rockefeller Foundation and the Welcome Trust were the check writers. As long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, we have no possibility for accountability. We have no possibility for justice. And what we do is we allow people who were formed out of the Eugenics Office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913, that same group of people that were the same group of people that established the World Health Organization in 1953, that same group of people are the ones who are making this decision. And I don't know how you feel about Eugenics, but I have a problem with it.
Saved - December 24, 2025 at 7:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explain that MTHFR mutations can cause folate deficiency, leading to anxiety and racing thoughts through neurotransmitter imbalances. If the body can’t convert folate to 5-MTHF, issues worsen, and synthetic folic acid can pile up and harm health. I highlight that zinc, heme iron, and magnesium support methylfolate and brain chemistry. I urge testing, prioritizing animal-sourced nutrition, and supplementing methylfolate as needed to restore mood and focus.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Shocking Truth: Did You Know A Genetic MTHFR Glitch & Folate Deficiency Could Be Fueling Your Anxiety & Racing Thoughts? Gary Brecka, Human Biologist Solid Research & Preventive Strategies Inside👇 If you've been battling mental fog, crushing anxiety, a racing mind, ADD, ADHD...you might be dealing with MTHFR gene mutations causing folate deficiency. Studies show MTHFR variants disrupt folate metabolism, leading to low mood, anxiety & relentless racing thoughts. Folate (vitamin B9) is crucial for brain chemistry, but if your body can't convert it to its active form methylfolate, due to MTHFR issues, neurotransmitter imbalances hit hard—think serotonin & dopamine shortages that tank your mental health. Added to this, high intake of synthetic Folic Acid, will further the imbalance because the body cannot use it to correct Folate deficiency. Folic Acid reaches toxic overload, creating more problems for those with MTHFR. Low folate levels are directly linked to anxiety, mood & attention issues that cause the belief that the racing mind can never be quieted or shut off. But here's the game-changer: Certain crucial minerals are key to maintaining optimal methylfolate levels & supporting mental health. - **Folate**: L-methylfolate (5-MTHF) is vital for mental health, directly driving production of serotonin, dopamine & norepinephrine while regenerating BH4 for optimal neurotransmitter synthesis. It lowers homocysteine & supports methylation through SAMe. MTHFR mutations impair folate conversion, raising risks of anxiety & mood issues. Consuming foods rich in natural folate (never consume Folic Acid) & supplementing L-methylfolate will restore & promote brain wellness & mood resilience. In Addition To MethylFolate These Cofactor Minerals Are Crucial For Mental Health: - **Zinc**: Essential cofactor for enzymes in the methylation cycle, including methionine synthase which works hand-in-hand with methylfolate & B12 to regulate homocysteine (high levels linked to depression). Animal sources like beef, oysters & poultry provide highly absorbable zinc—plants have it, but phytates in plants block absorption, making animal foods superior for optimal levels. - **Iron (Heme Form)**: Supports oxygen transport & energy production in the brain; deficiencies exacerbate folate-related anemia & fatigue that worsen anxiety & racing thoughts. Heme iron is ONLY found in animal products like red meat—non-heme iron from plants is poorly absorbed, & low iron can indirectly impair folate utilization for mental stability. - **Magnesium**: Powers over 300 enzymes, including those in folate activation & neurotransmitter function; deficiency ramps up anxiety & low mood. While in both plants & animals, animal sources like fish & dairy offer bioavailable forms that help sustain methylfolate pathways without anti-nutrients interfering. Don't ignore this—get tested for MTHFR, prioritize animal-sourced nutrition, supplement when needed to heal severe deficiency & reclaim your mental edge. Your life, a calm anxiety-free life without low moods, could depend on it. Resources & research in replies down below...

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that the food supply is treated with a chemical called folic acid, which is not a natural vitamin and did not exist until the 1980s. According to the speaker, folic acid is not found anywhere on the surface of the earth, whereas folate does exist in nature. The speaker notes that during pregnancy, women are told to take high doses of folic acid, and questions why a man-made chemical that didn’t exist until the eighties is deemed absolutely necessary for a healthy pregnancy. The comparison is made between folate and methylfolate, implying a distinction between natural forms and synthetic forms. The speaker also states that in the United States, the entire grain supply—flour, rice, bread, pasta, grains of any kind, and cereals—is required to be sprayed with folic acid, although this is not openly labeled as such. Instead, it is described as fortified or enriched foods. The speaker claims that these fortified or enriched nutrients are fed to children, and asserts that half of the population has a gene mutation that prevents them from processing folic acid effectively. The consequence, according to the speaker, is that when a person cannot process a high amount of something introduced into the body, it becomes dysfunctional. The speaker then connects this to a broader societal issue, describing a common scenario: a child goes to school, comes home with a phone call reporting inattention and poor ability to follow directions, and the ensuing medical response is the prescription of stimulants such as Adderall or Ritalin. The speaker characterizes this as a solution that uses amphetamines to accelerate the central nervous system to match the pace of a racing mind, rather than addressing underlying factors. Ultimately, the speaker presents a proposed solution: remove folic acid, fortified, and enriched nutrients from the diet, and observe changes in behavior. The underlying claim is that eliminating these synthetic nutrients would calm behavior and improve function, implying that the current approach relies on artificial chemistry rather than natural nutrition.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We spray our food supply with a chemical called folic acid. We've been told that folic acid is a is a natural vitamin, vitamin b nine. It's not. We make it in a laboratory. Folic acid does not exist anywhere on the surface of the earth. You cannot find folic acid anywhere in mother nature. Folate exists in mother nature. What's the first thing that we tell a pregnant woman to do when she gets pregnant? Take high doses of what? Folic acid. Why are we giving pregnant women a man made chemical that didn't even exist until the eighties something and calling it absolutely necessary for a healthy pregnancy. Folate and something called methylfolate. I'll tell you another quick one. In The United States, we are required to spray our entire grain supply. All flour, all rice, all bread, all pasta, and grains of any kind, including cereals of any kind with the chemical folic acid. Although we don't call it sprayed with folic acid, we call it fortified or enriched. So fortified or enriched foods, we feed to our children. Half of the population has a gene mutation that does not allow them to process that. Do you know what happens when you put high amounts of something into the human body that it can't process? It goes dysfunctional. And then we send our kid to school after it's a full contact sport to get them in the car to go to school, and the phone call comes home, and they say, little Johnny can't pay attention, and he doesn't follow directions, and doesn't listen. We need to bring in the Adderall or the Ritalin to solve this. We need to take his little mind that's racing and instead of calming his mind, we need to go into his central nervous system and break it. And race the central nervous system with amphetamines to match the pace of the mind. That's the solution. No. The solution is get the folic acid, the fortified and enriched nutrients, fake chemicals out of their diet and watch their behavior change. Right?
Saved - December 24, 2025 at 7:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting claims that the Amish in Lancaster, PA show 90x lower COVID fatality, with no masks or mandates and natural herd immunity as ~90% were infected early. They say autism is undetectable and chronic illnesses are rare, attributed to an unvaccinated, natural lifestyle. Cited studies reportedly find unvaccinated kids have fewer illnesses, while some vaccines are linked to higher rates. They ask what we should learn from the Amish. Full study links are promised.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🔥Let's talk about the Amish...Did you know the Amish had a 90X lower fatality rate from COVID & that Autism is undetectable in their community? Here's why their approach to health stands out—they ignore every CDC guideline, shun vaccines and their communities are thriving.... - **COVID Fatality Rate**: In Lancaster County, PA (home to ~45,000 Amish), only about 5 Amish deaths from COVID over the entire pandemic—resulting in a rate ~90 times lower than the U.S. average. - **No Lockdowns or Mandates**: The Amish continued normal life—no masking, no social distancing, no school/business closures, no vaccine mandates—and still had minimal COVID impact. - **Herd Immunity Naturally**: Reports indicate ~90% of the Lancaster Amish community contracted COVID early on, achieving natural herd immunity without vaccines. - **Autism Rates**: Essentially undetectable—Steve Kirsch, researcher Dan Olmstead & others report being unable to find unvaccinated Amish children with autism, unlike skyrocketing rates elsewhere. - **Other Chronic Conditions**: Virtually no cases of cancer, diabetes, ADHD, or autoimmune diseases in Amish kids, attributed to their unvaccinated, natural lifestyle. There are now more than a dozen vaccinated vs unvaccinated research studies that show being unvaccinated is always healthier: • 2020 study on 1,827 kids: Unvaccinated children had significantly lower rates of asthma, ear infections, ADHD, allergies & neurodevelopmental disorders. • 2017 study (6,000+ participants): Vaccinated kids were 4.5X more likely to have asthma, 22X more likely to need allergy medication & over 30X more likely to have allergic rhinitis. • New Zealand survey (over 200 unvaxxed kids): Almost ZERO chronic illness – no asthma, no eczema, no seizures, no diabetes. • Amish study: Autism rate roughly 1 in 15,000 vs national average of 1 in 31. (The few autistic children found in the Amish communities were children adopted INTO families, who were previously vaccinated & living outside the Amish.) What do you think—should we learn from the Amish? Drop your thoughts below! Full study links in the replies...

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker: Noted claims about the Amish and COVID. - The speaker traveled to Lancaster County, Amish country, visiting the house of a relative of Gideon King, described as the one person, the only known person in the Amish community who supposedly died from COVID. They say there may be up to five people, but the names of five people were not provided. A $2,500 reward on Twitter was offered for names of more than five people in Lancaster County who died from COVID; no one could name more than one person, and they all named Gideon King. - The speaker visited the house of Sam King, a relative of Gideon King. Sam said he doesn’t know if Gideon actually died from COVID. They think Gideon died in the hospital. - If there were five Amish people who died, this would mean the Amish death rate was 90 times lower than the infection fatality rate of the United States. - The explanation offered: this is possible because the Amish aren’t vaccinated and didn’t follow a single guideline of the CDC. They did not lockdown, did not mask, did not social distance, did not vaccinate, and there were no mandates to get vaccinated in the Amish community. - The speaker asserts there are no autistic kids in the Amish community, claiming it is very rare to find kids with ADD, autoimmune disease, PANDA, PANS, epilepsy, or other chronic diseases. - The speaker states the US government has studied the Amish for decades, but there has never been a report released to the public. The stated reason is that such a report would show that not following guidelines leads to better health. - The speaker concludes there is no public report after decades of study because it would be devastating to the narrative and would show that the CDC has been harming the public for decades.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's talk about the Amish. Yesterday, I drove to Lancaster County. I drove to Amish country. I drove from house to house to house. I actually went to the house of a relative of Gideon King. He's the one person, the only known person in the Amish community who supposedly died from COVID. Now they say there may be up to five people, but I was unable to get the names of five people. I offered $2,500 reward on Twitter. Hey. Give me the names of more than five people in Lancaster County who died from COVID. Not a single person was able to name more than one person. They all named Gideon King. I actually went to the house of Sam King, who's a a relative of of Gideon King, and I talked to Sam. He doesn't know if Gideon actually died from COVID or not. They die he died in the hospital. They think it was COVID, but maybe he died from the COVID hospital protocols. But let's say that we could name them, and there were five Amish people who died. That means the Amish died at a rate 90 times lower than the infection fatality rate of United States Of America. Now how is that possible? It's possible because the Amish aren't vaccinated and because the Amish didn't follow a single guideline of the CDC. They did not lockdown. They did not mask. They did not social distance. They did not vaccinate, and there were no mandates in the Amish community to get vaccinated. They basically ignored every single guideline that the CDC gave us, and there's no ought to we can't find an autistic kid who is unvaccinated. It's very, very rare in the Amish community, very, very rare. You won't find kids with ADD, with autoimmune disease, with PANDA PANS, with epilepsy. You just don't find any of these chronic diseases in the Amish. And, you know, the US government has been studying the Amish for decades, but there's never been a report out to the public. The reason, of course, is it would it would show that, oh, if you don't follow our guidelines, you're gonna end up healthier. That's why there's no report after decades of studying the Amish. There's no report because the report would be devastating to the narrative. It would show that the CDC has been harming the public for decades.
Saved - December 22, 2025 at 2:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m exposing a possible link between gluten issues and glyphosate exposure. Studies suggest glyphosate damages gut microbes, reduces gluten-digesting bacteria, and raises intestinal permeability—mirroring celiac disease. Key work: Samsel & Seneff (2013), Barnett & Gibson (2020), Mesnage (2021), Gildea (2017). Roundup as a desiccant boosted pre-harvest spraying; since 2006, wheat sees more exposure. Have you noticed wheat issues? Share your story.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨SHOCKING: Why did gluten allergies SKYROCKET in 2006? RFK Jr. drops the TRUTH BOMB on Big Ag's dirty secret...You won't believe what's in your bread! Is "gluten intolerance" actually GLYPHOSATE poisoning? Studies say it mimics celiac disease EXACTLY. Here's the shocking science: - **Samsel & Seneff (2013)**: Fish exposed to glyphosate developed digestive damage identical to celiac disease (villi inflammation, nutrient malabsorption). Explained rising celiac epidemic via gut bacteria destruction—glyphosate kills beneficial microbes through shikimate pathway while sparing pathogens. - **Barnett & Gibson (2020)**: At "safe" doses, glyphosate slashes good bacteria (Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium) and boosts pathogens—exact dysbiosis pattern seen in celiac & IBS patients. Reduces gluten-digesting bacteria like Rothia, triggering wheat sensitivity symptoms. - **Mesnage et al. (2021)**: Rats fed glyphosate/Roundup showed clear gut microbiome disruption via shikimate inhibition—direct evidence this imbalance drives celiac-like inflammation and leaky gut. - **Gildea et al. (2017)**: Glyphosate sharply upregulated zonulin in human gut cells, massively increasing intestinal permeability ("leaky gut")—the #1 hallmark of celiac disease that lets undigested gluten trigger immune attacks. Your "gluten allergy" might be herbicide residue.👇What changed when your wheat issues started? Key talking points from RFK Jr.: - **Roundup as Desiccant**: Discovered Roundup (glyphosate) dries out crops, preventing mold from rain during harvest—farmers loved it! - **Mass Adoption Post-2006**: 85% of all Roundup used in history has been since 2006, much as a pre-harvest spray on food crops. - **First Time on Wheat**: No Roundup-ready wheat existed before, but now it's sprayed directly on wheat right before harvest—no time to wash off. - **Direct Link to Health Issues**: This timing coincides exactly with the explosion in gluten allergies, celiac disease, and wheat sensitivities—draw the line at 2006! Time to #MAHA and clean up our food system. What's your take—have you noticed wheat issues? Drop a reply! 👇 & share your story about wheat, gluten, pasta & bread in the US verses pasta & bread in other countries where Glyphosate is banned... Cited research & link to full podcast of RFK Jr with Dr Mark Hyman, MD down below in replies...

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2006, it was discovered that Roundup is a desiccant, meaning it dries out crops. This allows farmers to spray Roundup on crops to dry them, reducing the risk of mold if rain occurs around harvest, which can ruin a silo. Monsanto began telling farmers to spray Roundup on crops, such as wheat, right before harvest or at harvest time. The practice became very popular, and about 85% of Roundup used in history has been used since 2006, with a large portion as a desiccant. This meant that for the first time, Roundup was sprayed on food, specifically just before harvest, rather than earlier in the season when the chemical might wash off. It was the first time Roundup was sprayed on wheat as a desiccant, since there was no such thing as Roundup Ready wheat. The transcript notes that 2006 marks the year when gluten allergies began exploding, mentioning celiac and other wheat-related problems that started to appear in the country. If one measures back to determine when these issues began, a red line at 2006 is identified as the year they started spraying Roundup on wheat.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2006, they discovered that Roundup was a desiccant of that. And what that means, if you spray it on a crop, it will actually dry out the crop. And one of the big enemies of the farmer is that if there's rain around the time of harvest, their crops can get wet, and and they get moldy, and then it ruins the entire silo. Yeah. And so what Monsanto did is they began telling farmers, spray this on the crop, on your wheat, right before harvest or at the time of harvest. And it was so popular that about 85% of Roundup that has been used in history has been used since 2006. Wow. A large part of that is as a desiccant. And what that meant, Mark, is for the first time, they're spraying it on food. Yeah. Right at harvest. Yeah. And for the first time Not early in the season when it may have a chance to wash off, but actually just before you're gonna eat it. Right. And they're spraying it for the first time on wheat because there was no such thing as Roundup Ready wheat. Yeah. They started spraying it on wheat as a desiccant. And so 2006 marks the day when suddenly these gluten allergies began exploding. Interesting. Celiac is is in all these kind of wheat problems that we started seeing in this country. If you measure back and say, when did it start? You can look and draw a red line. That's 2006, and it's the year that they began spraying it on wheat.
Saved - December 21, 2025 at 5:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I assert there’s zero evidence that dietary cholesterol or saturated fat causes heart disease, and that statins harm millions. Mechanisms include blocking CoQ10, inhibiting Heme A, suppressing dolichols, disrupting the mevalonate pathway, and damaging liver/pancreas. Side effects span muscle pain, rhabdomyolysis, neuropathy, cognitive issues, diabetes, liver enzymes, cancer risk, hormonal and kidney damage. Studies flag no heart benefit, even higher mortality. Real fix: ditch seed oils, sugar; eat real foods; TG/HDL <1.5; supplement CoQ10, Mg, K2, D3.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Statins Aren’t Saving Your Heart – They’re Destroying Your Body! “You Have To Know More Than Your Doctor Because Doctors Are Miseducated. Statins Are One of The Most Dangerous Drugs Out There.” – Dr. Cate Shanahan, MD There is ZERO evidence that dietary cholesterol or saturated fat causes heart disease. Statins don’t protect people — they harm millions. 🔥How Statins Actually Damage You (Mechanisms): - Block CoQ10 → muscle pain, weakness, heart failure - Inhibit Heme A → crashes cellular energy production - Suppress Dolichols → Parkinson’s, neurological damage - Disrupt Mevalonate Pathway → immune & hormone chaos - Damage liver & pancreas → insulin resistance & diabetes - Raise blood sugar (up to +46% diabetes risk) ⚠️Proven & Reported Statin Side Effects: • Muscle pain & weakness (1 in 10 users) • Rhabdomyolysis (life-threatening muscle breakdown) • Neuropathy & nerve pain • Heart failure (yes, statins cause heart damage) • Cognitive impairment & memory loss • Dementia & Alzheimer’s risk • Parkinson’s & ALS cases • Type 2 diabetes (dose-dependent) • Liver damage & elevated enzymes • Pancreatitis • Depression & mood disorders • Cancer (studies show increased risk) • Hormonal deficiencies (testosterone, estrogen) • Kidney damage • Headaches, dizziness, sleep issues • Digestive problems People on statins see NO reduction in heart attacks or death — studies show INCREASED mortality. ✅ The Real Fix (No Pills Needed): - Ditch seed oils, sugar, processed junk - Eat meat, eggs, butter (real food raises HDL, lowers triglycerides) - Aim for TG/HDL ratio < 1.5 (true heart marker) - Supplement CoQ10, Mg, K2, D3 to clear atherosclerosis caused by inflammatory sugars & seed oils. Your doctor was taught 50-year-old lies funded by Big Pharma & the American Heart Association.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that the American Heart Association used money to spend decades fabricating a huge pile of evidence to support the idea that cholesterol causes heart attacks, and that this pile of evidence is nonsense. He notes that some very smart scientists who have sifted through it have come to the same conclusion, that there is nothing here and no evidence. He adds that when you cut out vegetable oils and eat healthier foods, very likely your total cholesterol levels will go up, and your doctor will tell you to stop following this diet that’s improving your health and transforming your life. He warns it may scare you into taking a statin drug, which he calls one of the most dangerous drugs out there. He mentions that there is a whole chapter in Dark Calories about this so you can fortify your knowledge, and that you have to know more than your doctor because doctors are miseducated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The American Heart Association used that money to spend the next few decades fabricating a huge pile of evidence to support the idea that cholesterol causes heart attacks. And that pile of evidence is nonsense. It's nonsensical. And some very smart scientists who have sifted through it have, you know, come to the same conclusion. There's nothing here. There's no evidence. And I bring this up because when you cut out vegetable oils and eat healthier foods, very likely your total cholesterol levels will go up, and your doctor will tell you to stop following this diet that's improving your health and transforming your life. And it'll scare you maybe even into taking a statin drug, which is one of the most dangerous drugs out there. And so I have a whole chapter in dark calories about this so that you can kind of fortify your knowledge. You have to know more than your doctor because doctors are miseducated.
Saved - December 21, 2025 at 7:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A post claims 1.3 million US women were misdiagnosed with breast cancer over 30 years, leading to unnecessary mastectomies, chemo, and radiation, and asks for experiences. A responder labels the western medical system as profit-driven and promotes becoming one’s own physician and avoiding doctors. The original poster agrees, urging independent research and healing the body, stating they haven’t visited a doctor since 2019.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨SHOCKING: 1.3M women MISDIAGNOSED with breast cancer in the US over 30 years—forced into mastectomies, chemo, & radiation they NEVER needed! Has this happened to you or a loved one? Watch the proof 👇 https://t.co/9zkrInj6CO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that there has been manipulation of science and a dangerous phenomenon called overdiagnosis that has affected millions of women, particularly in breast cancer, over the last thirty years. Citing a recent study in the New England Journal of Medicine, the speaker claims that over the past three decades in the United States, one point three million women were diagnosed with early stage breast cancer that would never have caused harm. This condition is described as ductal carcinoma in situ, or stage zero cancer, which the speaker asserts was equated with actual cancer. According to the speaker, these diagnoses led to standard treatments such as mastectomy or lumpectomy with radiation, with chemotherapy, and then follow-up hormone-suppressive therapies like tamoxifen and an aromatase inhibitor (arimidex). The speaker contends that many women were subjected to these interventions for cancers that would not have caused harm, and therefore experienced the associated physical, psychological, and social burdens. The speaker characterizes the consequence as a form of medical holocaust, asserting that women were diagnosed with a cancer they did not have, underwent treatment, and endured stigma and psychospiritual stress as a result. Additionally, it is claimed that the healthcare industry told these women that they were saved or that their lives were extended, but the speaker asserts the opposite outcome occurred. A further claim is that these women identify with the aggressor in a manner likened to Stockholm syndrome. The speaker notes that millions participate in breast cancer awareness marches, seemingly unaware that the events are funded by corporations that profit from the drugs used to treat breast cancer. In summary, the speaker presents a narrative in which overdiagnosis led to widespread unnecessary cancer treatments, causing harm to a large population of women, while the industry purportedly benefited financially from the drugs and treatments administered. The remarks connect the phenomenon to broader concerns about the motives of the pharmaceutical and medical industries and the messaging surrounding breast cancer awareness campaigns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's been a manipulation of the science and there's been a very dangerous thing called over diagnosis that has really afflicted millions of women over the past thirty years, especially for breast cancer. Over diagnosis according to a recent study done in the New England Journal of Medicine, over the past thirty years in The United States resulted in one point three million women being diagnosed with early stage breast cancer that technically never had any type of cancer that would have caused harm. This is called ductal carcinoma in situ or stage zero cancer, which they equated with actual cancer, which now we know is not. And so what that basically meant is that they would give them the standard mastectomy or lumpectomy with radiation with chemotherapy, things like tamoxifen, and then follow-up hormone suppressive therapies like arimadex. So basically what we're dealing with here is a kind of a medical holocaust of sorts because those women now had to deal with being diagnosed with a cancer they didn't have, being treated for it, having the stigma and all the psychospiritual stress that's caused by that. And then statistically, the industry told them that they saved their lives when in fact, quite the opposite happened. So they identify with the aggressor like a Stockholm syndrome and millions of people march in these breast cancer awareness marches not realizing that it's funded by the very corporations that make money off the drugs used to treat breast cancer.

@WestonAPriceFan - FoodisMed

@ValerieAnne1970 Yup 💯. The western medical system is nothing but sales. Become your own physician and stay away from doctor's offices and hospitals!

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

@WestonAPriceFan Exactly! Do your own research & learn how to heal the human body & avoid the doctor. have not been to one since 2019.

Saved - December 21, 2025 at 3:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I share that glycocalyx damage drives inflammation and cholesterol rushes in to fix vessels. Real culprits: seed oils, processed sugars, excess carbs, insulin resistance, smoking, obesity, toxins, poor sleep, low vitamin D, magnesium and K2 gaps, inactivity, and chronic stress. Cholesterol is a superhero—protects against toxins, aids hormones, brain, bones, immunity, and more. The saturated-fat myth is false; aim for low triglycerides and TG/HDL <1.5 for heart health.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🔥FACT: "In the 1950s, EVERYONE walked around with cholesterol levels of 350 – & it was TOTALLY NORMAL!" Dr. Rimka drops the bomb: "The optimal lab range for healthy cholesterol was 320-350. A level of 350 is HEALTHY!" "Cholesterol has NOTHING to do with heart disease...ZERO!" Forget the myths – let's dive deeper into the TRUTHS shared by Dr Stephanie Rimka about your heart health. 👇 ### The Real Culprit: Glycocalyx Damage - Your blood vessels have a protective gel-like shield called the glycocalyx. - When it's damaged, inflammation kicks in – and cholesterol rushes to FIX it, like firefighters at a blaze. - Blaming cholesterol? That's like arresting the heroes for showing up! ### What WRECKS Your Glycocalyx? Avoid These Killers! - Industrial seed oils - Processed sugars - Excess carbs - Insulin resistance - Ultra-processed junk - Smoking - Obesity - Environmental toxins - Poor sleep - Low vitamin D - Magnesium deficiency - K2 deficiency - Lack of exercise - Chronic stress ### Cholesterol: Your Body's SUPERHERO Fat! - Shields against toxins, chemicals & heavy metals - Prevents dementia & brain fog - Lowers all-cause mortality risk - Fuels steroid hormones like testosterone - Builds strong bones, fights osteoporosis - Protects against strokes & heart issues - Essential for lungs & breathing - Core building block for cells & mitochondria - Boosts absorption of vitamins A, D, E & K - Aids digestion & bile production - Powers immune defense against infections - Guards vs. bacteria, pathogens & viruses - Reduces cancer risk & death rates - Lowers depression, suicide & anxiety risks - Cuts stress & cortisol levels ### Busting the Saturated Fat Fairy Tale - The "saturated fat causes atherosclerosis" story? PURE fiction pushed by flawed science (looking at you, Ancel Keys fraud! ) - Real threats: Oxidation, inflammation, pollution, seed oils & high blood sugar. - Stop fearing butter & steak – embrace them! 🥩 ### Unlock Optimal Heart Health: The Diet Hack - Go low-carb, high-nutrient animal foods 🥓🍳 - Ditch seed oils, starchy carbs, sugar & processed crap 🚫 - Result: Low triglycerides, High HDL – the ULTIMATE heart biomarkers! - Aim for TG/HDL ratio <1.5 for peak health. 📊 Mind blown? This could save lives! Share if you've been lied to about cholesterol. 👇Look for 3 sets of supportive peer reviewed research down below in replies...Let my passion & love for research support your optimal health! I read every reply. Your experienced 'shares' are so meaningful & I do my very best to respond to every question.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Cholesterol has nothing to do with heart disease, zero. Ansel Keyes was a researcher who committed scientific fraud, lying on the papers that determined them, saying cholesterol is highly implicated in cardiovascular disease. They know he lied; we’ve proven there was fraud. But yet all the cardiologists and all the PCPs, because the standard of care guideline is still if the cholesterol is this number “two zero one,” you better prescribe a statin, and if you don't, we will not defend you in the court of law if you get sued. That’s why they all do it, because of their malpractice. I’ve had physicians tell me this. They’re like, of course we know they’re bullshit. When my grandmother was alive, the normal cholesterol at my age was 350. So everybody used to walk around with three hundred three hundred fifty and it was very normal and they were all skinny and nobody worked out. Nobody was fat in 1950, 60, 70, they were thin. Three twenty, three fifty, that was normal. In the labs, two physicians, that’s normal. Nobody was treated. Three fifty is not high. I’m sorry they have not educated you on what really is causing it. What’s causing cardiovascular disease is damage to what’s called the glycocalyx. The glycocalyx is probably the largest organ in your body and none of you have even heard of it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cholesterol has nothing to do with heart disease, zero. Here's the thing, Ansel Keyes was a researcher. He committed scientific fraud. He lied on the papers that determined them saying oh look, cholesterol is highly implicated in cardiovascular disease. Turns out he lied. They know he lied. We've proven there was fraud. But yet all the cardiologists and all the PCPs because the standard of care guideline is still if the cholesterol is this number two zero one, you better prescribe a statin and if you don't, we will not defend you in the court of law if you get sued. That's why they all do it, because of their malpractice. I've had physicians tell me this. They're like, of course we know they're bullshit. When my grandmother was alive, the normal cholesterol at my age was 350. So everybody used to walk around with three hundred three hundred fifty and it was very normal and they were all skinny and nobody worked out. Nobody was fat in 1950, 60, 70, they were thin. Three twenty, three fifty, that was normal. In the labs, two physicians, that's normal. Nobody was treated. Three fifty is not high. I'm sorry they have not educated you on what really is causing it. What's causing cardiovascular disease is damage to what's called the glycocalyx. The glycocalyx is probably the largest organ in your body and none of you have even heard of it.
Saved - December 19, 2025 at 4:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I warn that thousands of pets die daily from needless vaccines. One rabies shot lasts forever; laws push boosters. There are no limits on vaccination, and doses aren’t adjusted for weight. Over-vaccination is linked to rising diabetes, cancer, kidney and heart disease. Grain-based dry foods are toxic. Titers are ignored; vets push more shots. Mars owns clinics and brands, prioritizing profits. Whistleblowers silenced; vet backlash and higher suicide risk. Demand titers, refuse unnecessary vaccines.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨OUR PETS ARE DYING: "There are 1000s of pets dying out there every day from vaccines they didn't need." - Dr. John Robb, DVM Our furry friends are being poisoned for profit—it's time to wake up! Here's the shocking truth: - **One Rabies Shot for Life**: A single rabies vaccination protects pets FOREVER, yet laws force annual boosters they don't need. - **No Limits on Over-Vaccination**: There are ZERO rules capping how many times pets can be jabbed for the same disease, leading to deadly overdosing. - **Size Doesn't Matter—But It Should**: Vaccines aren't adjusted for body weight; a tiny 5lb cat gets the SAME dose as a 100lb dog, risking lethal reactions. - **Rising Chronic Illnesses**: Over-vaccinating & over-medicating is skyrocketing pet diseases like diabetes, cancer, kidney failure & heart issues. - **Toxic Pet Food Alert**: Grain-based dry foods loaded with byproducts, seed oils & chemicals are wrecking dogs' & cats' health. - **Titer Tests Ignored**: If pets show positive antibodies via titers (just like humans), they shouldn't need more shots—but vets push them anyway. - **Big Food's Grip**: Mars (yes, the candy giant) owns 3,000+ vet clinics & 50+ pet food brands, prioritizing profits over pet lives with unnecessary meds, tests & services. - **Whistleblowers Silenced**: Dr. Robb faced backlash from Mars for refusing to follow harmful vaccination policies—research shows full doses are "dangerous" & "potentially lethal." - **Vet Suicide Crisis**: Veterinarians pushing for change are ignored, taunted & laughed at in hearings, contributing to a suicide rate 4X higher than the general population. Stop the madness! Protect your pets—demand titer testing & say NO to unnecessary vaccines. 👇 Lots of cited resources in replies, please check them out & as always DM me with questions...

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are thousands of pets out there dining out every day. While we sat at this table, five, six pets died in The United States from a rabies vaccine they didn't need. Anybody can walk in here, sit down and say whatever they want, but I gave you silence. I said to the state board, if I had to kill an animal to obey that law, would I have to do They said yes. One rabies vaccine is good for life. All this is unnecessary if that dog had a titer check, it would not need a vaccination. So this is the real problem here. I had put upstairs in the public health department 45 articles that show vaccines are dose dependent. Titers indicate immunity. It's been proven. Okay. But who's the we? Who's the we? The researchers. The researchers. These are the researchers. They're the ones who do the research. Okay. I spent a career the pharmaceutical. And I spent a career being a veterinarian watching the animals die. See. Think that happened before. But I completely don't agree with what you're saying. Do you know of any studies that the vaccine can sometimes create other health concerns for animals? Can you talk a little bit about that? Absolutely. You get tumors at the injection sites. You get autoimmune diseases that start later in life, but you get the immediate reactions. Some dogs die immediately of anaphylaxis. Others get just serum sickness and they vomit. Maybe you hide under the bed for a day or two. But if I lower my dose to protect the animal, then I'm in trouble. So I have to do what the manufacturer says. And like the State Board of Connecticut said, if I have to kill my pet, I have to kill my pet. It's the law. Well, guess what? I have a Hippocratic oath that is greater than any law that's passed in the state of Connecticut that would make me kill my patient. I won't do it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are thousands of pets dining out there every day. While we sat at this table, five, six pets died in The United States from a rabies vaccine they didn't need. Anybody can walk in here, sit down and say whatever they want, but I gave you silence. I said to the state board, if I had to kill an animal to obey that law, would I have to do They said yes. One rabies vaccine is good for life. All this is unnecessary if that dog had a titer check, it would not need a vaccination. So this is the real problem here. I had put upstairs in the public health department 45 articles that show vaccines are dose dependent. Titers indicate immunity. It's been proven. Okay. But who's the we? Who's the we? The researchers. The researchers. These are the researchers. They're the ones who do the research. Okay. I spent a career the pharmaceutical. And I spent a career being a veterinarian watching the animals die. See. Think that happened before. But I completely don't agree with what you're saying. Do you know of any studies that the vaccine can sometimes create other health concerns for animals? Can you talk a little bit about that? Absolutely. You get tumors at the injection sites. You get autoimmune diseases that start later in life, but you get the immediate reactions. Some dogs die immediately of anaphylaxis. Others get just serum sickness and they vomit. Maybe you hide under the bed for a day or two. But if I lower my dose to protect the animal, then I'm in trouble. So I have to do what the manufacturer says. And like the State Board of Connecticut said, if I have to kill my pet, I have to kill my pet. It's the law. Well, guess what? I have a Hippocratic oath that is greater than any law that's passed in the state of Connecticut that would make me kill my patient. I won't do it.
Saved - December 19, 2025 at 2:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see how normal blood pressure targets have shifted—from 100 plus your age, to 160/90, to 140/90, to under 120/80 by 2025—turning healthy people into patients for profit. Anti-hypertensives topped $36.7B in 2024, with lower thresholds driving lifelong prescriptions that treat symptoms and side effects, not root causes. I favor natural fixes: whole-food, low-carb, avoid seed oils and sugar, boost potassium/magnesium, and stress-free, active living. What’s your BP story?

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Why Big Pharma Keeps Moving the Goalposts on Blood Pressure Numbers—Turning Healthy People into Patients for Profit? **Historical "Normal" BP Shifts:** - 1940: 100 + your age (e.g., 170/95 fine for a 70yr old) - 1970: 160/90 - 2000: 140/90 - 2025: Must be under 120/80, or you're "hypertensive" **The Profit Machine:** - Anti-hypertensive drugs raked in $36.7 BILLION in 2024 alone - Lower thresholds = more diagnoses = more lifelong prescriptions - Meds don't fix root causes, just symptoms—leading to more pills for side effects **Hidden Dangers of BP Meds:** - Chronic cough - Low sodium & potassium - Dizziness & headaches - Dehydration & muscle cramps - Gout & joint pain - Insomnia, nightmares, & depression - Slow heartbeat & heart palpitations - Asthma symptoms - Sexual/erectile dysfunction - Fainting & kidney issues - Angioedema (swelling of face/tongue) - Very low BP increases chronic illness & mortality risk, especially in seniors **Natural Ways to Optimize Your BP (No Pill Deficiency Here!):** - Adopt a whole-food, low-carb diet prioritizing nutrient-dense animal foods - Eliminate seed oils, processed junk, & sugar - Boost potassium & magnesium via unrefined mineral salts & targeted supplements—they power your body's sodium-potassium pump - Focus on lifestyle: stress reduction, exercise, & finding YOUR unique normal Higher BP in older adults often means longer life—don't let them scare you into over-medication! What’s YOUR BP story? Are you on meds or are you going natural with therapeutic doses of magnesium glycinate & high potassium supplementation? Drop it below! 🔥 I read every comment & do my best to answer every question! Meet me in 'replies' where I share why the 'changing of blood pressure numbers' is so very personal to my family!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker outlines the historical changes in blood pressure guidelines and raises questions about what is considered normal or target. - In 1970, the criteria for high blood pressure was 160/90, at which point doctors began discussing medications with patients. There was also an age-based rule of thumb: the systolic number should be “100 plus your age,” so a 70-year-old could have a blood pressure around 170/whatever and still be considered acceptable. - About thirty years ago, the teaching in medical education shifted to a threshold of 140/90 for initiating medication, meaning patients with high blood pressure were typically sent to their primary care doctor to consider treatment. - In 2017, a study prompted another change, suggesting blood pressure should be lower than 120/80. The speaker describes this as a “pretty lofty goal,” noting that it is a level “that almost hardly anyone can pass.” - The speaker highlights real-world factors affecting readings: arriving at a doctor’s office stressed or caffeinated, being rushed, taking measurements with the cuff over clothing, and other situational issues that can push readings above 120/80. - The question is raised: is the push for lower targets driven by corporate greed from pharmaceutical companies, aiming to lower margins so most people would require medication, or by altruistic motives to prevent heart attacks or strokes? The speaker asks viewers to share their opinions in the comments. - The speaker acknowledges the hypothetical possibility that, regardless of age, blood pressure could be below 120/80, and notes there may be ways to achieve a normal reading for an individual. The central question remains: what is normal blood pressure? - The discussion shifts to whether blood pressure targets should differ by age, asking what the ideal blood pressure should be at ages 20 versus 80, and noting that research may support different needs across ages. It is pointed out that for many elderly individuals, some research suggests higher blood pressure targets might be appropriate, with the observation that people with low blood pressure due to multiple medications may have worse health outcomes or shorter lifespans than those with higher readings. - The speaker poses these as important questions to reflect on, mentioning that there is research suggesting varying recommendations for the elderly and that questions about historical patterns remain open. The transcript ends with leaving these issues for readers to ponder rather than asserting definitive answers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 1970, the criteria for high blood pressure was one sixty over 90. That's when the doctor started talking to you about your high blood pressure and whether you should take medications. There was another method of knowing if you had high blood pressure, especially as you got older, was the systolic number had to be a 100 plus your age. So if you were 70 years old, it was perfectly acceptable to have your blood pressure one seventy over something. As long as it was lower than that, everything was a okay. Then somehow about thirty ish years ago when I was in school, the numbers changed to when you were supposed to give someone medication. We were taught in our school that when someone had high blood pressure that was one forty over 90, that's when you were to send them out to their primary care doctor and have them take medication. Well, then in 2017, something happened. And that is a study came out that said people's blood pressure should be lower than one twenty over 80. Now that is a pretty lofty goal. That is very low such that almost hardly anyone can pass that. When you go into a doctor's office in the middle of the day, you've already had stress. You're already stressed about being there. Maybe you've been waiting in the waiting room too long, you probably had coffee or some type of food prior to that appointment, then they rush you into the room, usually put the blood pressure cuff off a number of over a number of clothing as you're dangling there, as they're asking questions. There's a whole host of reasons why your blood pressure is gonna be above one twenty over 80. If you are above one twenty over 80 now, you're gonna get a talking to. You're gonna get a little spanking, little slap on the wrist, the doctor's gonna talk to you. But if you're above one thirty over 80, now that's the criteria for medication. Now let me know what your opinion is. Is this simply corporate greed from pharmaceutical companies to lower the margins so low that almost no one can pass, and thus every one of us should be on blood pressure medication? Or are are the pharmaceutical companies so altruistic that they just wanna help humanity that they've made the criteria such that, you know, they're really saving lives and preventing us from having a heart attack or stroke. Let me know what you think is the answer down in the comment section down below. Hypothetically, this may be true. No matter what our age, maybe all of our blood pressure should be below one twenty over 80. There is probably a way to get your blood pressure to normal for you, but the million dollar question is, what is normal blood pressure? What should our blood pressure be when we're 20 years old? What should our blood pressure be when we're 80 years old? And whatever your opinion is, there's probably research to support that. In fact, for many people that are elderly or old, it's interesting that now they're starting to say, or at least there's some research to support that your blood pressure should be higher. That people that have low blood pressure because there's on so many medications are actually having less health and dying sooner than the people with higher blood pressure. So go figure. But that's the history of what we've seen so far just in my lifetime. Now what were they doing a hundred years ago in the nineteen twenties with high blood pressure? Were people dropping dead like crazy because of high blood pressure? And now that we're getting everyone below one twenty over 80, we're all living longer lives? Is that the reason why people are living longer now? Are they living longer? These are great questions to ask, and I'll leave it up to you to try to read between the lines. Now
View Full Interactive Feed