TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @VigilantFox

Saved - March 7, 2026 at 12:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reflect on Jeffrey Epstein’s transhumanism obsession and how ideas like cloning, gene editing, and merging with AI now echo among tech elites. I explore Lisa McGee’s warning of a “forced evolution,” a digital twin future, and a biological data ecosystem where humanity could become infrastructure. I note concerns about who authority to redesign humans truly rests with, and the potential for biological systems to feed a vast AI network.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Jeffrey Epstein’s obsession with transhumanism is far more disturbing than most people understand. He was fascinated with cloning, genetic engineering, and redesigning the human species—ideas that, not long ago, sounded like pure science fiction. Today many of those same ideas are openly discussed by the tech elites building artificial intelligence. Which raises an unsettling question: what if the push to merge humans with AI has been quietly unfolding for decades? That question carries even more weight when you consider the resurfaced declassified CIA files showing that, dating back to the 1950s, there were plans to manipulate Americans’ minds through covert drugging—using vaccines, food, water, you name it. There’s another detail that makes this harder to ignore. Epstein had a well-documented obsession with transhumanism and gene editing. Today, many of those same ideas are appearing again among powerful figures shaping the future of technology. Bottom line: nothing about this conversation is truly new. The difference is that the technology and capabilities behind it have advanced dramatically. So what do they actually mean when they talk about the need for humanity to merge with AI? Joining us today to help unpack that question is researcher Lisa McGee. 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
The host references declassified CIA files suggesting that dating back to the 1950s there was a plan to manipulate Americans’ minds through covert drugging via vaccines, food, and water. They also note Epstein’s reported obsession with transhumanism and gene editing, and observe that there are currently many powerful people who share similar interests. The takeaway asserted is that nothing fundamental has changed, but the technology and capabilities to implement such ideas have advanced, making it a particularly important topic in today’s volatile environment. The host then asks what is really meant when officials talk about humanity merging with AI. Joining the discussion to address this question is researcher Lisa McGee, who appears after a short sponsor message.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You may have all recently seen the resurfaced, declassified CIA files that told us plainly that dating back all the way to the nineteen fifties, there was a plan to manipulate Americans' minds through covert drugging with vaccines, food, water, you name it. People also saw that Epstein had an obsession with transhumanism and gene editing, and we just so happen to have a lot of people in power today who are obsessed with the same things. Bottom line, nothing has really changed, but the technology and capabilities they have to do it have advanced, and this is something to be particularly mindful of in a time of extreme volatility like we're living in. What do they really mean when they talk about the need for humanity to merge with AI? Joining us to answer that question today is researcher Lisa McGee. She joins us after this short word from one of the sponsors who make our independent reporting possible. If there's one thing we can learn from The Epstein Files, it's that there are two tiers in this country, one for regular people and one for the rich and connected. And that divide doesn't stop in the courtroom. It runs straight through the financial system. While most people stay distracted, the wealthy keep multiplying their net worth. One of the fastest ways they've done that is through cryptocurrency. For years, crypto has been a playground for experienced traders to capitalize on everyday investors who panic sell at the worst possible moment. But now everyday people can finally be on a level playing field. Animas.ai, available through Block Trust IRA, analyzes market data and executes trades with precision most investors can't match. Since 2022, it has outperformed Bitcoin by 250%. In 2025 alone, Block Trust IRA helped create over 80,000 new millionaires. And right now, our viewers can receive $2,500 in bonus crypto instantly when they open a qualifying account through dailypulsecrypto.com. Start supercharging your retirement today. Take the first step at dailypulsecrypto.com. That's dailypulsecrypto.com.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The interview opened with a sweeping claim about where biotechnology and pharmaceuticals may be heading. Lisa suggested that the wave of new medical technologies and engineered biological materials we’re seeing today may not be random innovation at all, but part of a much larger transformation of humanity itself. Synthetic materials found in pharmaceuticals, bioengineered bacteria, and even electromagnetic technologies are slowly interacting with the human body in ways most people rarely consider. Over time, she argued, these materials don’t simply pass through the system. The body begins adapting to them. She described this process as a “forced evolution,” where the body gradually adjusts to foreign synthetic inputs simply because survival demands it. In her view, humanity’s biological systems are built to endure and adapt, which means they eventually begin accommodating these materials. From there, she pointed to what she believes is the bigger picture. The real objective, she said, may be a technological ecosystem powered by human biological data. Each person could eventually have a digital representation of themselves, something she referred to as a “digital twin,” operating inside AI networks using information pulled directly from the body. If that vision proves accurate, she warned, humanity wouldn’t just interact with the system. It would become part of the infrastructure itself. “Humanity is the fuel that is going to feed that AI ecosystem.” Watch the full episode: 👇 https://rumble.com/v76qgiu-epstein-class-enacts-plans-for-human-cyborgs-daily-pulse-ep-211.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I think what a lot of people aren't really familiar with is the bioengineering aspect of this, and we only need to look to this recently published headline from the Daily Mail, which was resurfaced, declassified CIA files that revealed a chilling blueprint to manipulate Americans' minds through covert drugging with vaccines. And it's not just vaccines that was in that blueprint. It's also the food, the water supply, pretty much altering our state of mind and our biology through all of these methods. And this is going back all the way to the fifties. One can only imagine how far they've come now, but you've been digging into this, and you have a bit of an idea as to how far they've come. To us about your latest research. Speaker 1: So you're absolutely right. And this has been, you know, a slow progression. Nothing is just being, you know, introduced new. I mean, it the technology has advanced, but it's been going on for decades decades, hundreds of years. And when you think about pharmaceuticals, the the apparatus of pharmaceuticals, they are all they it is medicinal chemistry, which is synthetic materials, synthetic biology, engineered bacteria, yeasts, molds, and all of those things like you just said. We have we are being assaulted with these these materials, which are now considered devices, you know, with the manipulated EMF and frequencies. And all of those are to exactly what you just said, weaken the system. And really this pro this slow progression of a we're in the midst of a forced evolution to become providers of a synthetic material, hybrid synthetic material. So we'll continue to produce as we do because the humanity's biological systems are by design meant to thrive and recycle and and repurpose themselves, but to survive. And so we accept these synthetic materials, and we and our body slowly begin to make accommodations to those mutations, natural mutations, but also so much of these so much of the synthetic material is coded to go in and trigger a mutation or to forcibly cause a mutation. So we literally are walking around. I mean, all of us, and it goes from the tiny little mushroom that's growing in the woods to, you know, aquatic life to every single biological electrical system, the nervous system, you know, is based on frequency. It's based on electricity. And so that is that's what's being attacked is the nervous system and the immune systems of every living being. Speaker 0: Now you're talking about some very important things here, Lisa. You've sent me this article from Medium titled the synthetic nervous system, a blueprint for physical AI. And in this article, it talks about how for the past decade, AI has lived primarily in a box, but now, our, you know, our interaction with AI has been linguistic and digital. We've cracked the code apparently, completely on generative AI, unlocking the ability to, listen to this, manipulate symbols, pixels, and code at scale, but we're now entering a far more complex epoch, the era of physical AI. And they are talking about the transition from AI that thinks to AI that acts. So they're saying the intelligence behind humanoid robots. They also give, you know, autonomous systems and things of this nature. My concern is that their plan stated goal is that they want humans to integrate with AI. This is something that even Elon Musk itself has said we need to do in order to stay relevant. And your research shows that they're already in the process of doing that. Talk to us a little bit about that. Speaker 1: Yes. And probably have. We and and, you know, I think that life as we know it will fairly stay the same because what the integration is through, and you've heard of this, is the digital twin. You know, assigning each of us a representative in the AI ecosystem, ecosystem, which which is is a a digital twin. But that digital twin is able to function and, perform because it is it is based off of your data, your biological data, your, that they are going in and removing and stealing through the infiltrators and facilitators that is vaccines, bioengineered foods, bioengineered bacteria. The, you know, the pharmaceutical industry is the perfect setup, and it's only one of one setup that goes in, and now these are all synthetic material devices. They work off of Wi Fi. They're software platforms, and they are all digital. And they are being monitored by the Department of Energy, HHS, MITRE now, these private companies and private oligarch, you know, tech companies that all have access to our free our our inner, you know, biological data DNA and and everything. And so that the AI platform, in order for it to succeed and for its longevity, there has to be a cohesive connection between humanity because we are the fuel that is going to feed that AI ecosystem. And it cannot it it's not gonna be one or the other. It has to work cohesively, and and they have to be joined. And how the the joining of those literally is through an infiltration system, which is primarily vaccines and engineered pathogens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think what a lot of people aren't really, familiar with is the bioengineering aspect of this, and we only need to look to this recently published headline from the Daily Mail, which was resurfaced, declassified CIA files that revealed a chilling blueprint to manipulate Americans' minds through covert drugging with vaccines. And it's not just vaccines that was in that blueprint. It's also the food, the water supply, pretty much altering our state of mind and our biology through all of these methods. And this is going back all the way to the fifties. One can only imagine how far they've come now, but you've been digging into this, and you have a bit of an idea as to how far they've come. To us about your latest research. Speaker 1: So you're absolutely right. And this has been, you know, a slow progression. Nothing is just being, you know, introduced new. I mean, it the technology has advanced, but it's been going on for decades decades, hundreds of years. And when you think about pharmaceuticals, the the apparatus of pharmaceuticals, they are all they it is medicinal chemistry, which is synthetic materials, synthetic biology, engineered bacteria, yeasts, molds, and all of those things like you just said. We have we are being assaulted with these these materials, which are now considered devices, you know, with the manipulated EMF and frequencies. And all of those are to exactly what you just said, weaken the system. And really this pro this slow progression of a we're in the midst of a forced evolution to become providers of a synthetic material, hybrid synthetic material. So we'll continue to produce as we do because the humanity's biological systems are by design meant to thrive and recycle and and repurpose themselves, but to survive. And so we accept these synthetic materials, and we and our body slowly begin to make accommodations to those mutations, natural mutations, but also so much of these so much of the synthetic material is coded to go in and trigger a mutation or to forcibly cause a mutation. So we literally are walking around. I mean, all of us, and it goes from the tiny little mushroom that's growing in the woods to, you know, aquatic life to every single biological electrical system, the nervous system, you know, is based on frequency. It's based on, electricity. And so that is that's what's being attacked is the nervous system and the immune systems of every living being. Speaker 0: Now you're talking about some very important things here, Lisa. You've sent me this article from Medium titled the synthetic nervous system, a blueprint for physical AI. And in this article, it talks about how for the past decade, AI has lived primarily in a box, but now, our, you know, our interaction with AI has been linguistic and digital. We've cracked the code apparently, completely on generative AI, unlocking the ability to, listen to this, manipulate symbols, pixels, and code at scale, but we're now entering a far more complex epoch, the era of physical AI. And they are talking about the transition from AI that thinks to AI that acts. So they're saying the intelligence behind humanoid robots. They also give, you know, autonomous systems and things of this nature. My concern is that their plan stated goal is that they want humans to integrate with AI. This is something that even Elon Musk himself has said we need to do in order to stay relevant. And your research shows that they're already in the process of doing that. Talk to us a little bit about that. Speaker 1: Yes. And probably have. We and and, you know, I think that life as we know it will fairly stay the same because what the integration is through, and you've heard of this, is the digital twin. You know, assigning each of us a representative in the AI ecosystem, ecosystem, which which is is a a digital twin. But that digital twin is able to function and, perform because it is it is based off of your data, your biological data, your, that they are going in and removing and stealing through the infiltrators and facilitators that is vaccines, bioengineered foods, bioengineered bacteria. The, you know, the pharmaceutical industry is the perfect setup, and it's only one of one setup that goes in, and now these are all synthetic material devices. They work off of Wi Fi. They're software platforms, and they are all digital. And they are being monitored by the Department of Energy, HHS, MITRE now, these private companies and private oligarch, you know, tech companies that all have access to our free our our inner, you know, biological data DNA and and everything. And so that the AI platform, in order for it to succeed and for its longevity, there has to be a cohesive connection between humanity because we are the fuel that is going to feed that AI ecosystem. And it cannot it it's not gonna be one or the other. It has to work cohesively, and and they have to be joined. And how the the joining of those literally is through an infiltration system, which is primarily vaccines and engineered pathogens.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The conversation took a dramatic turn when Maria shifted the focus to Jeffrey Epstein and the circles of power around him. She pointed out that Epstein wasn’t just connected to a criminal network. He was also deeply fascinated with genetic engineering, cloning, and transhumanism. Those ideas once sounded like science fiction. Today, Maria noted, many of the same concepts are openly discussed by leading figures in Silicon Valley and the AI industry. What was once dismissed as fringe speculation is now being advanced by the very people shaping the future of artificial intelligence. Some transhumanist thinkers now openly discuss merging humanity with AI through brain chips, neural interfaces, and other forms of digital integration. Lisa agreed, saying the idea of “upgrading” humanity has circulated among elite institutions for decades. In her view, powerful groups have already decided that humanity should evolve into something fundamentally different. That led her to a question she believes few people are asking: who gave those elites the authority to redesign the human species? She captured the concern in one blunt sentence. “The people that are deciding what the advanced species needs to look like just so happen to all be friends with the p*dophile by the looks of it.” Watch the full episode: 👇 https://rumble.com/v76qgiu-epstein-class-enacts-plans-for-human-cyborgs-daily-pulse-ep-211.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
- Speaker 0 urges not to dismiss the discussion, noting that resurfaced CIA files and Epstein files have made certain topics more accepted. They say there was “transhumanism… engineering of humans potentially cloning,” which used to be dismissed as conspiracy theory but is now seen as real. They link these themes to those who rule over us, and observe that Epstein’s interests in vaccines and Bill Gates are echoed by figures like Musk, who say we need to be “one with the AI” and that perhaps everyone needs a brain chip. Speaker 0 claims Lisa and their research support this, and that the conversation is continuing. - Speaker 1 responds by affirming the importance of the point and recalling a deep past discussion about transhumanism. They describe it as a “very collective and very orchestrated plan of this evolution” that has been happening for centuries. They say it is an evolution by “a group of entities” or a “very high powered… influential group of individuals” who became an institution and decided that humanity needed to evolve. They ask who is deciding what an ordinary species is and what the mechanics and architectural blueprint are that advance that species, asserting that “we’re in that right now.” - Speaker 0 adds: “Right. We The people that are deciding what the advanced species needs to look like just so happen to all be friends with the pedophile by the looks of it.” - Speaker 1 concludes with “100%.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think it's really important for people to really pay attention to what you're saying here and to not dismiss this. This is these are conversations you and I have actually had in the past, but I think the public is a lot more receptive to it these days because of the fact that, well, the those resurfaced CIA files for one, the Epstein files for another. You know, you clearly see that there was some sort of transhumanism going on there, engineering of humans potentially cloning, all sorts of stuff that used to be, you know, filed into the this is too crazy conspiracy theory box that people are now saying, okay. This is very real, and these are the people that rule over us or at least those who rule over us have something to do with these people. And we see similar things that Epstein was interested in being repeated by these transhumanists, and his interest in vaccines and Bill Gates. And all of these themes are being repeated by your Musks, for example, who say that we need to be one with the AI. And in order for to stay relevant, we need to be one with it. And maybe everyone needs a brain chip. They don't even need to chip your brain, I don't think, Lisa, and I think your research proves this. But there's some go on. Oh, go on. Speaker 1: But, well, you you bring up a very, very excellent point. And I remember you were and I mean this sincerely, Maria. You you and I you were one of the very first people who I had we had a very deep conversation about transhumanism and about this idea of of what this really is and what what we are experiencing and what we are being forced into. And it is it is a very collective and very orchestrated plan of this this evolution, and it has been going on for centuries. It is an evolution to where a group of entities or or a very high powered, you know, influential group of, individuals and that turned into an institution decided that humanity needed to to evolve. Now those that are deciding you know, the the definition of transhumanism is taking a an ordinary species and creating a more advanced one. Well, who is it that's deciding what is an ordinary species? And then deciding the the mechanics and the the architectural blueprint that then, is involved in the technology to advance that species. Well, we're in that right now. Speaker 0: Right. We The people that are deciding what the advanced species needs to look like just so happen to all be friends with the pedophile by the looks of it. So Speaker 1: 100%.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: If there’s one undeniable lesson from the Epstein files, it’s this: There are two tiers of justice: One for regular people. And one for the rich and powerful. That divide runs straight through the financial system. One of the fastest ways the rich and connected multiply their wealth is through cryptocurrency. http://dailypulsecrypto.com 👈 But crypto is volatile. It’s high-risk. It swings violently. And for years, it has been the perfect playground for experienced traders to capitalize on everyday investors who panic-sell at the worst possible moment. That’s how wealth transfers. But the playing field is finally beginning to level. AI technology that was once reserved for the connected and institutional elite is now available to the public. Animus AI, overseen by BlockTrust’s crypto experts, analyzes trends, identifies optimal entry and exit points, and executes trades with a level of precision most human traders simply cannot match. That precision is a major reason BlockTrust IRA was voted the #1 crypto trading platform out of more than 1,500 competitors worldwide. Since 2022, the AI engine behind Block Trust IRA has outperformed Bitcoin by 250%. BlockTrust IRA operates within federally approved retirement account structures for everyday Americans. That means you can move your existing IRA into a strategy designed for stronger growth than one tied solely to the U.S. dollar. Because of that federal structure, BlockTrust IRA also offers a $200 million institutional insurance account designed to help protect your investment. In 2025 alone, Block Trust IRA helped create over 80,000 new millionaires. And right now, our viewers can receive $2,500 in bonus crypto instantly when they open a qualifying account. While others stay distracted, you can start positioning yourself differently right now. Take the next step and secure your free 2026 crypto review at http://dailypulsecrypto.com with a trusted BlockTrust IRA-certified crypto expert. DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

As the discussion deepened, Lisa returned to what she believes is the real objective behind much of modern biotechnology. In her view, the struggle unfolding today isn’t primarily political or economic. She believes it ultimately comes down to energy. Specifically, she pointed to the energy stored inside human DNA. According to her argument, DNA represents a vast reservoir of biological energy and information. She believes advanced technological systems are being built to harvest and convert that resource in ways that could sustain a massive AI-driven infrastructure. Within that framework, synthetic biological materials—including engineered pathogens and pharmaceuticals—take on a different meaning. Lisa suggested they may serve as tools designed to gradually modify the human body so it can interact more directly with these technological systems. She also pointed to large-scale health data networks run by government agencies and technology companies as evidence that an enormous biological data ecosystem may already be taking shape. In her view, humanity is slowly being integrated into that system as one of its components. “The battle we are in is about energy… DNA is an infinite amount of energy… the elixir to feed that beast is humanity’s energy.” Watch the full episode: 👇 https://rumble.com/v76qgiu-epstein-class-enacts-plans-for-human-cyborgs-daily-pulse-ep-211.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes a slow, methodic, and consistent plan that has evolved over time, linking vaccines and engineered materials to population control. They claim these technologies are designed to "feed" and sustain an AI state or institution, which they describe as an AI ecosystem or matrix that requires humanity’s bodies as fuel. Key points: - The vaccines and engineered materials are part of a broader strategy to control populations, while the ultimate goal is for these systems to feed on humanity’s energy. - The speaker emphasizes a spiritual dimension, framing the struggle as a war in the biological system. They assert that the battle centers on energy, specifically that DNA contains an infinite amount of energy and storage, which can be converted to control. - They describe the system as an elaborate, multilayered, cohesive operation that presents itself as infiltrators, vaccines, engineered viruses, and pathogens. Once these are in human systems, they set up shop as facilitators that enable an outside source to advance the AI ecosystem. - The claim is that AI and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) are now fully run on AI digital data, harnessing human information and uploading it into AI clouds and data systems. Additional framing: - The “elixir” to feed the AI beast is humanity’s energy, and the various components used to alter or distort DNA and biology are part of a strategy to sustain that feed. - The overall narrative ties together biological interventions (vaccines, engineered materials, and pathogens) with the operation and expansion of an AI-driven, energetically consuming system, suggesting that the external AI infrastructure relies on human data and biology as its fuel. In summary, the speaker portrays a deliberate, slow-moving plan where vaccines and engineered materials are tools to population control and to seed a broader AI ecosystem that feeds on human energy, with DNA energy as a central resource, and where AI-enabled systems (including AI-enabled HHS operations) orchestrate this fusion of biology and digital control.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a very slow, methodic, and consistent and, you know, brilliantly psychotic plan in how it's been slow evolution. You know, we can't. The the idea of having, you know, the these these vaccines and this engineered material also is assisting with, population control. That that's that's obvious. But they need our bodies. They need to have humanity supplement their AI state. It's an institution, and it is what they believe in. So they need our bodies, Maria, to feed its fuel for the AI ecosystem ecosystem in order because, again, we need to realize the the spiritual significance of this and the war that we're in for the biological system because it it what it what it boils down to or what it really comes down when you sift through all of this is the battle that we are in is about energy, and it is about humanity's energy because DNA is in an infinite amount of energy, which is and storage, which is energy. So this idea to convert that in order to be able to control it and then feed their institution and their AI ecosystem or matrix, that is you know, when when you when it is described that way and presented that way, it starts to fall into place. The puzzle pieces start to fall into place of how this AI ecosystem has it is sort of the finale. Right? And the elixir to feed that beast is humanity's energy. Wow. And all of the components that go into altering it, to distorting it, to the way that we continue to provide it through these synthetic materials is to come up with an elaborate multilayered massive system, which which are are is cohesively, representing as both an infiltrator, vaccines, engineered, you know, viruses and pathogens. And once they are in our systems, then they set up shop as the facilitator. So the outside source comes in. Now AI HHS is fully run now on AI digital data that is harnessing our information and uploading it into the AI clouds, you know, their data systems.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: “Unequal weights are an abomination to the Lord,” writes Alin Armstrong in his groundbreaking book The Bible and Gold. http://goldbiblepulse.com 👈 Since Eden, gold has been God’s standard for honest money—a safeguard no one can print away or corrupt. Genesis Gold Group shares that same commitment to biblical principles. Their faith-driven experts help you convert fragile paper promises into real, physical gold and silver that hold their value, even when the world’s systems fail. Armstrong’s essential work exposes the lies of modern money. And Genesis Gold Group shows you how to fight back. Get your FREE copy of The Bible and Gold now at http://goldbiblepulse.com and learn how to protect your retirement with God’s unchanging standard of honest money. That’s http://goldbiblepulse.com — honest money for uncertain times. DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Later in the interview, the discussion turned noticeably darker as Lisa laid out a theory involving engineered pathogens and radioactive materials. She explained that many biological agents stored in government repositories have been altered using radiation technologies. According to her research, some of those materials may have already been introduced into the broader population through various medical interventions. If that is true, she argued, the implications could be enormous. The human body itself could become a kind of distributed platform for biological systems capable of being triggered or manipulated under certain conditions. Lisa described humanity as a “stockpile,” suggesting that if the materials embedded within the population were activated simultaneously, the result could resemble a large-scale biological event. The conversation then shifted to vaccine mandates and the pressure some families have faced in schools and public institutions. Lisa argued that the urgency behind certain medical policies reflects the importance of embedding these biological systems within the population. In her view, once those systems are in place, global technological networks could interact directly with human biology. She delivered the warning bluntly. “They can create a pandemic at any moment by activating the things that have infiltrated our bodies.” Watch the full episode: 👇 https://rumble.com/v76qgiu-epstein-class-enacts-plans-for-human-cyborgs-daily-pulse-ep-211.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a theory they’re exploring: every vaccine examined, and the patents and testimony from the Department of Energy, point to a 500,000-strong collection of bioweapons categories, including plague, HIV, anthrax. They claim all these bacteria and yeasts have been mutated and converted into a “hybrid gamma irradiated” form, advanced and radioactive, and that these are entering humanity. They say, regarding a nuclear stockpile, humanity itself becomes the host of these radioactive materials, since they are digital and can be activated to detonate a mass casualty event. Speaker 1 clarifies by restating the concern: they can create a pandemic at any moment by activating materials that have infiltrated our bodies. Speaker 0 adds that they have become involved in helping families legally; their law firm supports families because some school districts have become worse than during COVID, even though childhood vaccines are still largely recommended federally. They claim school districts and scientists are desperate to get these materials into children, with Catholic schools allegedly no longer honoring religious or medical exemptions. They describe children with severe reactions and contraindications being denied entry to schools, faced with truancy threats or expulsion. They insist there is nothing healing about these vaccines and call it an infiltration system necessary for AI to function properly. Speaker 1 mentions the U.S. allegedly cutting ties with the WHO, but says research by John Fleetwood shows the U.S. maintains relationships relating to vaccines and influenza, with substantial taxpayer funding. They assert that with a digital ID, one’s bank account can be cut off if they don’t get certain vaccines or comply to maintain the digital ID, arguing the agenda has continued and accelerated with AI. Speaker 0 adds that the WHO remains a standing organization but has been rebranded, and emphasizes that the United States is front and center in partnerships with the WHO. Speaker 1 introduces Biomems (biomedical microelectromechanical systems) as a subset of MEMS used in biomedical research and medical devices, noting that this has existed for years. They describe sensors under the skin that transmit data to pharmaceuticals or governments, not just pacemakers. They reference Albert Bourla, who stated that a pill has been designed to track compliance. Speaker 0 confirms: “They tell us what they're doing.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is this was pretty shocking for me, and it it was hard for me to grasp, and it's a theory of mine. I could be wrong. But and and I with this research, I started realizing this pretty quick is, you know, with all of these, every single vaccine, and I've we've we've gone through a lot of them, not all of them, obviously, and gone through the patents. And and the testimony of this is Department of Energy's, you know, 500,000 collection of of bioweapons categories, you know, category four level. I mean, you've got, you know, the plague. You've got HIV. There's, you know, anthrax. I mean, you name it. They've got it in there. Every single one of these bacterias and yeast have been mutated and converted into a hybrid gamma iridated. So they are advanced primed with advanced radioactive materials. They are going into humanity. So when we're talking about a nuclear stockpile, we're walking we're we are. Humanity is in itself a stockpile of nuclear weapons because these register, they are you know, they're digital. They go in. But if there's a need to detonate an a mass casualty of nuclear nuclear catastrophe, We are the host of these, radioactive materials. Speaker 1: Basically, they can what you're saying is they can create a an event, a a a a, a pandemic at any moment by activating the things that have infiltrated our bodies. Speaker 0: Yes. And that's what you know, you see now we're, one of one of the roles that I've taken on, and I'm I I absolutely am an advocate for it, and I love it. And being a mom, and I went through it a little bit with my son with the not a little bit. I went through it with the COVID vaccine. I was able to keep him unvaccinated. But we're helping families right now, our the law firm with I mean, these there's school districts that have become absolutely worse than they did with the COVID, and none of these are you know, the the childhood vaccines are still largely recommended or they're recommended at the federal level. These school districts and these these scientists, this this machine is so desperate to get these materials inside of kids. I mean, Catholic schools are no longer honoring a religious exemption, you know, a medical exemption. I mean, kids have severe reactions and contraindications to these causative agents, and they are getting turned away from schools. They're getting threatened with truancy. They're getting threatened with expulsion. That doesn't logically make sense. Right? There is nothing healing about these at all, Maria. This is an infiltration system that they have to get in. It's a necessity and a requirement for AI to function properly and successfully. Speaker 1: Yeah. This is exactly why when we're told that, The US has cut all ties with WHO, we find out through the research of people like John Fleetwood that, in fact, they are absolutely maintaining their relationship when it comes to vaccines and influenza, which there's, you know, hundreds of millions of dollars of, of American taxpayer dollars going to, because that's something quite common. That's something that happens to a lot of people. That's something that, you could say in future. It's a risk if you don't get it. And by the way, because you now have a digital ID, which they're, you know, pushing so aggressively here and everywhere, your bank account's cut off if you don't get this. In order to maintain your digital ID, you have to you have to comply with this. So the agenda hasn't stopped at all. In fact, with the introduction of AI, I think it's accelerated. Speaker 0: It's well, and it's changed hands. I mean, it's gotten a facelift, and it's gotten a reboot and it reboot, and it's actually mean, WHO is still obviously a standing organization and an entity, but it is it's sort of, it's rebranded itself, but you are absolutely right. The United States of America is is front and center in partnerships and collaborations working with the WHO. Speaker 1: Yeah. Biomems, I wanted to talk to you a little bit about this. Again, for anyone who's doubting what we're talking about, Biomems or biomedical microelectromechanical systems has emerged as a subset of MEMS devices for applications in biomedical research and medical microdevices. This is going back years. What we're talking about is someone, what someone like Casey Means, is involved in, you know, tracking of your, health under the skin. You know, people think of pacemakers and things of this nature really good for, you know, keeping you alive. This is not what this is. This is sensors under your skin that are sending data back to pharmaceuticals, governments, whatever the case may be. And we hear that from Albert Burla, by the way, where he was saying we've we've designed a pill that's going to track compliance. Speaker 0: Yes. They tell us what they're doing. Yeah.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

As the interview neared its end, the conversation turned to the larger implications of everything that had been discussed. Maria described a future that some technologists now speak about openly. In that vision, humans live inside a mixed digital reality shaped and monitored by powerful AI systems. The goal, she said, isn’t simply smarter technology. It’s the full integration of human biology with digital infrastructure. Lisa agreed and argued that the key to that integration lies in the nervous system. Human emotions, perception, and experience all move through electrical signals in the body. If those signals could be captured, replicated, or manipulated through technology, behavior itself could theoretically be influenced on a massive scale. The discussion then tied that vision to the rapid construction of data centers, energy grids, and the massive infrastructure required to power large-scale AI systems. Lisa said those developments point toward a future where humanity is gradually absorbed into the technological systems it has built. Her final warning left little doubt about where she believes this trajectory leads. “Humanity is the food that’s going to feed that industrialized beast… we are in the midst of a forced evolution.” It’s hard to imagine a discussion more important than this. Make sure you watch the full episode: 👇 https://rumble.com/v76qgiu-epstein-class-enacts-plans-for-human-cyborgs-daily-pulse-ep-211.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses the public misunderstanding of what it means for humans to integrate with AI, noting that many imagine only using chatbots more, but the concept is a mixed reality existence where it’s hard to distinguish digital from real. They reference documents describing a future where people won’t leave their lounge rooms, with loved ones appearing as holograms and the sensation of hugging them in the skin, including dopamine and endorphin release, even though the contact is with a hologram. This is presented as part of a broader push into a digital world since COVID. Speaker 1 responds by connecting this to the idea of a societal digital nervous system, where everything is based on electricity and emotions, and life is governed by electrical processes like fight or flight. They describe a state-run institution in which AI would be the teacher, and emphasize that the spectrum of digital integration would form a pervasive nervous-system-like infrastructure. Speaker 0 calls the future horrific to contemplate and points to aggressive data-center expansion, NDAs shielding big tech from communities, aquifers being drained, and people losing access to water. They argue the situation will worsen as the push continues. Speaker 1 adds that the flooding in Texas highlighted the strategic importance of the Edward Aquifer and notes that many natural underground water stores are being taken over by the Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of Energy, and the Department of Commerce, with involvement from the Interior and State Department. They describe a broader pattern of resource control, mentioning the Tennessee Valley Authority and the involvement of the Department of Defense and the Army Corps of Engineers in a large-scale, fifteen-minute city grid, including water resources and nuclear power being confiscated. Speaker 0 warns that declaring national security needs could justify eminent domain, a notion Sam Altman has suggested in relation to AI, and asserts that this would normalize the appropriation of resources. They argue this is why legislative action is needed to protect communities and prevent such takeovers. The discussion expands to concerns about water poisoning through data-center pollution, EMF exposure, noise, health impacts, and other environmental harms accompanying the data-center push. Speaker 1 concludes by offering a personal course of action: a heartfelt recommendation to pray and to build a relationship with Jesus, stressing the importance of prayer and faith in navigating these concerns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I really want people to understand when they say that humans need to integrate with AI, and we've seen multiple transhumanists make those statements. Multiple. You you I don't know that a large portion of the public understands the implications that we're talking about here. And how do we get to the point of humans integrating with AI? I think people imagine, Lisa, oh, well, that just means me using chatbots more. That just means me getting chat GPT premium. No. That's not what they're talking about. They actually Speaker 1: good stuff. Speaker 0: They they are, in their own documents, define it as a mixed reality existence where you can't really distinguish the difference between what's digital, what's real. And they've they've really pushed us into more into that digital world since COVID. But this Speaker 1: is Oh, 100%. Speaker 0: And I'll just give a quick example of what I've read in the past. They talk about a future where you won't because you'll all be in fifteen minute prisons. Right? So you won't leave your lounge room. You'll see your mom. She'll appear as though she's a hologram. You'll hug the hologram, and you will have the feeling in your skin and the dopamines and endorphins that come with hugging someone that you love, those will release even though you're only hugging a hologram. This is literally what they have described in their own medical publications. I've read it. I've reported on it. Speaker 1: Can you so so what that exactly what you're describing is what we talked about early earlier. The the visual of that or the the concept of that is the societal digital nervous system. Everything comes from your nervous system because it is an electrical current. It is the it is your electricity. Emotions are based on electricity. Life is based on it. Fight or flight. We know, our our mental, everything is connected to that. So when you can capture and control that, then and and create that as a, you know, societal institute, an institution. I mean, that that is what that is. The digital societal nervous system is a state run institution, will be, and AI is the teacher. Speaker 0: It's really it's a really horrific kind of future to think about. And, you know, when you think about how aggressively they're pushing with these data centers and how they are railroading communities, protecting them protecting the the big tech companies and others with NDAs so the communities don't even see them coming, aquifers being drained dry, people with no well water, and this is only gonna get worse. Speaker 1: It's it's only gonna get worse. I I wrote a paper. I'll share. I'll send it to you. It was a report and for doc Pete and some other people with the floods, the Texas flood a couple years well, it was two years ago, was that? Speaker 0: Last year. Speaker 1: Last year. And the massive and I didn't mean to interrupt you, but the massive strategic importance of the Edward Aquifer in Texas, you know, that runs down El Paso or down, that is now being taken over as our other aquifers, natural you know, massive underground water storage. Most of them, Maria, have been taken over by the Army Corps of Engineer, the Department of Energy, and the Department of Commerce, interior, and state department. So they are we are in a real competition for natural resources, eminent domain. Tennessee Valley Authority right now is several residents. It's a large vast area of of Eastern Tennessee that Tennessee Valley Authority, which is a private public, the electric company and the dam run by DOD, Department of Energy, and now Department of Defense, Army Corps of Engineers have gotten involved the last fifteen, twenty years. An entire 2,030, 50 sustainability, you know, fifteen minutes fifteen minute fifteen minute city grid that is going along, but all of that underwater, and nuclear power is all being confiscated. Speaker 0: So all it takes is to declare that this is needed for national security, which Sam Altman has suggested, of course, should be the case when it comes for AI, and and that's it, then then imminent domain becomes commonplace. And, you know, this is this is why we need some sort of legislative action to stop this. This is why from the very, very top, the federal government's tried to say tried to block states from doing anything about this, from protecting their communities. It's not just drying the aquifers, by the way, because that won't necessarily happen in every instance. Right. It's it's poisoning the water supply with all the waste that that comes out of these data centers and the pollution and and the the noise pollution, the EMF, all of the different very damaging health concerns that come along with these, and yet they're pushing so aggressively. And, hopefully, people understand from this interview why that is. Now I'm guessing, Lisa, that you have some suggestions for what people need to do with this information. It's all quite grim. Speaker 1: Well, I'm gonna say this. What I'm gonna say is coming sincerely from my heart is I think you we you need to pray. We need to pray. We need to we need to get right with the person who you believe in and and Speaker 0: Jesus is who we believe in. Speaker 1: Jesus. Yes. We do. And and really create a relationship with with him and and pay attention.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: Health insurance in America is broken. joincrowdhealth.com/pulse 👈 Every year, over 200,000 Americans go bankrupt because of medical bills—many of them already had insurance. And on average, 20% of claims are denied, leaving families stuck paying massive out-of-pocket costs after spending thousands on premiums. But there’s an alternative. CrowdHealth is a community-powered model helping members fund nearly 100% of their medical bills at a fraction of the cost. So far, 28,000+ members have been helped, with a 99.9% funding success rate and over $56 million in medical bills saved. CrowdHealth isn’t insurance. It’s a way to step outside the broken system and take control of your healthcare. Get started today for $99 per member per month for the first three months. Go to joincrowdhealth.com/pulse and use code PULSE. DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by CrowdHealth. Thank you for supporting our sponsors.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks for tuning in. Follow us (@ZeeeMedia and @VigilantFox) for stories that matter—stories the media doesn’t want you to see. We’ll be back with another show on Sunday. See you then. Watch the full interview: 👇 https://rumble.com/v76qgiu-epstein-class-enacts-plans-for-human-cyborgs-daily-pulse-ep-211.html

Saved - March 2, 2026 at 8:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting a diary line where the top intelligence adviser says Epstein was an intelligence asset, potentially by a U.S. ally—Israel. They say there’s no direct evidence, yet claim there is direct evidence. Full interview via @StevenBartlett:

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

DIARY OF A CEO: “You believe [Epstein] was an intelligence asset… potentially by a U.S. ally?” TOP INTELLIGENCE ADVISOR: “Yes.” DIARY OF A CEO: “So who is that ally?” GAVIN DE BECKER: “Israel.” DIARY OF A CEO: “There’s no direct evidence.” GAVIN DE BECKER: “There is direct

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Full interview via @StevenBartlett: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t38LbMVoPCs

Saved - February 27, 2026 at 7:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Dr. Paul Thomas studied 3,324 children and found unvaccinated kids had fewer doctor visits and better health. The data showed higher rates in the vaccinated group for fever, infections, asthma, allergies, eczema, and behavioral issues (ADHD zero among unvaccinated). The Oregon Medical Board suspended his license days after publication, and the study was later retracted. Others faced similar punishment for exposing such comparisons; why are doctors punished for comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

He proved unvaccinated kids were healthier. They revoked his license. Dr. Paul Thomas studied 3,324 children and found unvaccinated kids had FEWER doctor visits and BETTER health outcomes. Here’s what his data showed: Fever – 9.1× higher in vaccinated Ear Pain – 3.4× higher Otitis Media (Ear Infections) – 2.9× higher Conjunctivitis – 2.4× higher Eye Disorders (Other) – 1.8× higher Asthma – 5.2× higher Allergic Rhinitis (Hay Fever) – 6.9× higher Sinusitis – 4.3× higher Breathing Issues – 2.9× higher Anemia – 5.5× higher Eczema – 4.5× higher Urticaria (Hives) – 2.1× higher Dermatitis – 1.4× higher Behavioral Issues – 4.1× higher Gastroenteritis – 4.7× higher Weight/Eating Disorders – 2.5× higher ADHD – 0 cases in unvaccinated group *Data based on how often children visited the doctor for each condition* Instead of investigating the findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas’s license—just days after the study was published. Months later, the study was retracted. Dr. Paul Thomas isn’t the only one who faced swift punishment for publishing inconvenient science. Other doctors have faced similar consequences for exposing the same pattern. The question is: Why are doctors being punished simply for comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids? 🧵

Saved - February 26, 2026 at 3:57 AM

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

A stunned @JoeRogan stares in disbelief as he reads a “f*cking crazy” email Jeffrey Epstein wrote in 2018. “Holy sh*t.” “Like that’s just there. There’s no way to interpret that any other way.” “That person is me.” https://t.co/oemsuURiA7

Saved - February 22, 2026 at 2:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explore the view that autoimmune disease isn’t random but driven by root causes—mold, metals, viruses, parasites—plus chronic infections and lifestyle factors. Instead of endlessly suppressing the immune system, we should restore the terrain: sleep, sunlight, exercise, diet, and stress management. Steroids and immunosuppressants carry serious risks. CWD bacteria and dormant infections may underlie flares, and five care errors repeat. We deserve better medicine.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The hundreds of millions of people with autoimmune disease may get more clarity in this 80-second video than they’ve gotten from years of doctor visits. Gary Brecka flipped the narrative and asked: “What if God didn’t make a mistake?” “What if the immune system is actually acting properly,” and it’s attacking the body for a reason, but you just have to figure it out? He argues that, in most cases, you can trace the root cause of autoimmune disease back to four broad categories: • mold and mycotoxins • heavy metals • viruses • and parasites. According to Brecka, if you systematically eliminate those four drivers, you’ll discover that your autoimmune disease begins to resolve because the immune system no longer has a reason to attack. Like Brecka, @MidwesternDoc has spent years uncovering what’s really driving autoimmune disease. If you or someone you love is suffering, don’t skip this 5-minute read. It goes deeper into what Brecka just laid out. 🧵

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Autoimmune disease has become one of the most common and stubborn health crises of our time. Millions are told that their immune system is “attacking” them. It’s random. It’s lifelong. They’ll need powerful drugs forever. And those drugs? Often toxic. Often suppressive. Often life-altering. But what if that entire framework itself is incomplete?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Conventional rheumatology largely treats autoimmune illness as a malfunctioning immune system. In that case, the solution becomes straightforward: Suppress it. Steroids. NSAIDs. Immunosuppressants. Symptoms decrease, but the underlying process is frequently untouched. When medicine focuses only on shutting down inflammation, something deeper is usually missed.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Steroids are widely used for autoimmune conditions. They work by forcefully suppressing immune activity. But prolonged systemic steroid use carries severe side effects. Patients are often placed in a cruel tradeoff. Deal with the debilitating disease or sign up for long-term immune suppression and all of its side effects. That’s not a cure. That’s, at best, management.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

There’s far more beneath the surface of autoimmune disease—including chronic infections, lifestyle drivers, and overlooked therapies. @MidwesternDoc goes much deeper in the full piece. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-they-dont-tell-you-about-autoimmune

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

One major alternative explanation is that many autoimmune conditions have an underlying cause. Things like chronic stealth infections, food allergies, and lifestyle factors. If the root cause is never identified, suppressing symptoms can allow the real problem to progress quietly while causing even more damage.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

One striking mechanism involves Cell Wall Deficient (CWD) bacteria. These are bacteria that, when exposed to lethal stress—like cell-wall destroying antibiotics—shift into a primitive survival form. They literally change morphology, become difficult to detect, and are often mistaken for debris. Yikes! Yet evidence shows they are found in “aseptic” tissues under autoimmune attack.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

These CWD bacteria can remain dormant. Then—when conditions become favorable—transform back into their active form! This suggests something profound: Chronic infections may not be reinfections. They may be dormant infections created by prior antibiotic exposure. That changes everything.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Some alternative medical schools observed bacteria shifting forms depending on the body’s internal terrain. So instead of forcing change through aggressive suppression, we should probably restore a “healthy terrain.” Right? When the internal environment improves, pathogenic forms diminish. That’s a fundamentally different model of healing. And it makes all the sense in the world.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Five recurring errors show up repeatedly in autoimmune care. Not one. Five. And they’re systemic. Let’s walk through them. https://t.co/fUe7ntd1yy

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Error 1: Missing the Cause Autoimmune disorders often have a trigger—like a chronic infection. Instead of identifying it, powerful immune-suppressing drugs are used. The visible inflammation quiets. But the underlying issue advances. https://t.co/OzWWdguBR7

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Error 2: Ignoring Lifestyle Drivers Sleep. Sunlight. Exercise. Diet. Stress. These aren’t minor factors. They directly influence autoimmune expression. Address them—and symptoms can reduce dramatically. Ignore them and medications escalate—sometimes forever. https://t.co/Lr3C5xOCn6

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc If you’ve ever been told “there’s nothing you can do,” it probably wasn’t accurate. @MidwesternDoc outlines concrete steps most physicians never discuss. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-they-dont-tell-you-about-autoimmune

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Sleep disruption is profoundly linked to illness. Autoimmune patients frequently have disturbed sleep cycles. Improving sleep hygiene and reducing blue light exposure can significantly improve outcomes. Sleep isn’t a luxury. It is absolutely required for health. https://t.co/06XWktaXJ8

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Sunlight deficiency is tied to a wide range of conditions—including autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis. Lack of sunlight exposure is associated with a 60% increase in mortality. Sunlight also helps restore circadian rhythm and improve sleep. Yet it’s often demonized without context. We need sunlight. It’s as simple as that.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Exercise improves fluid circulation. Did you know that fluid stagnation underlies many illnesses? A sedentary lifestyle worsens stagnation. Movement improves it. Even insomnia often improves when circulation improves. I’m sure you’ve noticed that these systems are interconnected.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Diet is a major contributor. Common triggers include wheat, dairy, and nightshades. Food allergens frequently contribute to autoimmune arthritis. Deficient stomach acid may allow improperly broken-down proteins to enter circulation—triggering immune reactions. Elimination diets often produce major improvements. If you’re curious, you can start one today!

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Stress isn’t abstract. • 80% of autoimmune patients report unusual stress prior to onset. • Stress disorders increase autoimmune risk by 46%–129%. Some patients won’t respond to medication until stress is reduced. Yet stress management is rarely prioritized. Why? https://t.co/bWael4IOtB

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Error 3: Escalation Instead of Reflection Instead of asking what we’re missing when a drug that “should work” fails, the common reflex is to throw more immunosuppressants at the symptoms. But if someone has cycled through multiple potent rheumatologic drugs, something fundamental may have been overlooked.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Error 4: Safer Options Underused Some autoimmune drugs with better risk-benefit ratios are relatively new, so many physicians aren’t aware of them. As a result, drugs not intended for long-term use—like steroids and NSAIDs—remain the mainstay. That’s a problem. https://t.co/pZlTC0KXqg

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Error 5: Effective Therapies Ignored Therapies like ultraviolet blood irradiation and DMSO have scientific evidence supporting efficacy. Lots of it. Many effective therapies are anti-inflammatory and active against mycoplasma bacteria. Yet because they aren’t patentable, they’re often sidelined. Because patients aren’t being put first.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc There’s more detail—including steroid risks and safer withdrawal strategies—in @MidwesternDoc's full breakdown. It’s worth reading. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-they-dont-tell-you-about-autoimmune

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

There’s another pattern older physicians have observed: A concerning decline in human vitality. Patients are sicker. They’re harder to treat. And they’re less resilient. And the average body temperature dropping. There’s less ability to mount fevers. And increasing fluid stagnation. Autoimmune disorders continue rising—sharply.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Here’s the truth (and it’s hopeful, don’t worry): When we stop chasing symptoms and start restoring balance… Sleep improves. Inflammation falls. Medication burden decreases. Autoimmune disease isn’t always random. And you are not powerless against it. Support the terrain. Ask better questions. And demand better medicine.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-they-dont-tell-you-about-autoimmune

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by A Midwestern Doctor: The Great Alzheimer’s Scam and The Proven Cures They’ve Buried for Billions https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-alzheimers-scam-and-the

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The FDA’s 50-Year War on the Safest Painkiller Ever Discovered https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-remarkable-history-and-safety

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow! No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. ---> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/5UG2MzGn4M

Saved - February 14, 2026 at 7:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Epstein, alongside Gates, discussed pandemics as a permanent funding bucket, not a one-time emergency, in 2017 emails. A Epstein associate spoke of pandemic-related insurance payouts tied to declared pandemics. Sayer Ji’s findings reveal a system built on lab funding, media hype, and profit from every new threat, with money simply moving to the next outbreak rather than ending.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

A new investigation has revealed that Jeffrey Epstein, alongside powerful people like Bill Gates, may have MASTERMINDED the COVID response before it hit. Internal emails show that in 2017, Epstein was part of an email chain with Bill Gates discussing how “pandemics” could be treated as a PERMANENT funding bucket inside large donor-advised funds — positioned not as a one-time emergency, but as an ongoing area where capital could be organized and directed long term. And oddly enough, that same year, a close associate in Epstein’s network told him she had been working on “pandemic-related insurance products” designed to automatically pay out when a pandemic is declared. Coincidence? That’s only scratching the surface of what @sayerjigmi’s report uncovers: https://sayerji.substack.com/p/breaking-the-epstein-files-illuminate As Kim Iversen put it, “The new investigation and the Epstein files show that this wasn’t about preparedness. This was about control.” “‘We’ll have these plans in place so that at the opportune moment, we can trigger them and gain all of this power and control.’” What you’re about to read lays out how this machine actually works, from lab funding and media hype to profit mechanisms that turn every new “threat” into a predictable payday. Think this ended with COVID? The money didn’t disappear. It just moved to the next “outbreak.” 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
A new investigation has revealed that the Epstein files show Epstein alongside powerful people like Bill Gates may have masterminded the COVID pandemic years before the pandemic hit, that they were planning, preparing, they were in ways that would give them more control, more money, more authority with almost no accountability that they would gain, they would be able to to to crush a dissent. They would be able to utilize emergency power in a way that never went away, and that this wasn't done in order to prepare for, oh, no. What if something happens? People may say, well, you know, it's always good to prepare for, you know, a disaster or something along those lines, but the new investigation and the Epstein files show that this wasn't about preparedness. This was about con that it wasn't, we'll have these plans in place just in case. It was, we'll have these plans in place so that at the opportune moment, we can trigger the trigger them and gain all of this power and control over not only the American people, but the world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A new investigation has revealed that the Epstein files show Epstein alongside powerful people like Bill Gates may have masterminded the COVID pandemic years before the pandemic hit, that they were planning, preparing, they were in ways that would give them more control, more money, more authority with almost no accountability that they would gain, they would be able to to to crush a dissent. They would be able to utilize emergency power in a way that never went away, and that this wasn't done in order to prepare for, oh, no. What if something happens? People may say, well, you know, it's always good to prepare for, you know, a disaster or something along those lines, but the new investigation and the Epstein files show that this wasn't about preparedness. This was about con that it wasn't, we'll have these plans in place just in case. It was, we'll have these plans in place so that at the opportune moment, we can trigger the trigger them and gain all of this power and control over not only the American people, but the world.
Saved - February 12, 2026 at 10:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I think the Trump administration looks f*cking terrible as Epstein files are redacted. Why is the sultan who sent Epstein the torture video named? This isn’t good for this administration. It looks terrible for Trump when he said this was a hoax. This isn’t a hoax. Maybe he didn’t know, but this is not a hoax. Redacting names of non-victims doesn’t protect anyone. So what are you doing—why isn’t all of this released?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Joe Rogan says the Trump administration “looks f*cking terrible” as questions mount over Epstein Files redactions. “Why is [the sultan who sent Epstein the torture video]’s name redacted?” “What is this? This is not good. None of this is good for this administration. It looks f*cking terrible. It looks terrible for Trump when he was saying that none of this was real. This is all a hoax.” “This is not a hoax. Like, did you not know? Maybe he didn’t know, if you want to be charitable, but this is definitely not a hoax. And if you got redacted people’s names, and these people aren’t victims, you’re not protecting the victim. So what are you doing? And how come all this sh*t is not released?”

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the excerpt, the discussion centers on a torture video and questions surrounding redactions and the handling of victims. The key points are: - It is stated that Sultan Ahmed bin Suleyman Suleyem sent the torture video to Epstein in 2009. The transcript presents Epstein’s replies within that exchange, including: “Where are you? Are you okay?” and, reflecting a mix of fascination and distress, “I love the torture video. Jeez. I am in China. I’ll be in The US May. What the fuck, man?” - There is a strong focus on why a person’s name is redacted. The speaker presses: “Why is his name redacted? Why would your name be redacted if you're not a victim? Like, this is what's crazy about all this. Like, how come you redact some people and you don't redact other people? Like, what is this?” - The broader political critique follows, with the speaker asserting that “This is not good. None of this is good for this administration. It looks fucking terrible. It looks terrible. It looks terrible for Trump when he was saying that none of this was real.” The speaker emphasizes that “This is all a hoax” as claimed by Trump and argues against that framing: “This is not a hoax. Like, did you not know? Maybe he didn't know if you wanna be charitable, but this is definitely not a hoax.” - The speaker questions the credibility and transparency of disclosures: “And if you've got redacted people's names and these people aren't victims, you're not protecting the victims. So what are you doing?” This leads to a demand for more transparency: “And how come all this shit is not released?” Overall, the excerpt juxtaposes a reportedly circulated torture video linked to a named individual with concerns about redactions and victim protection, while interweaving political commentary about the administration and statements by Trump that claimed the matters were a hoax, contrasting those claims with the speaker’s insistence that the situation is not a hoax and warrants fuller release of information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sultan Ahmed bin Suleyman Suleyem sent the torture video to Epstein. This is in 2009. Epstein was saying that. Where are you? Are you okay? I love the torture video. Jeez. I am in China. I'll be in The US May. What the fuck, man? And why is his name redacted? Why would your name be redacted if you're not a victim? Like, this is what's crazy about all this. Like, how come you redact some people and you don't redact other people? Like, what is this? This is not good. None of this is good for this administration. It looks fucking terrible. It looks terrible. It looks terrible for Trump when he was saying that none of this was real. This is all a hoax. Mhmm. This is not a hoax. Like, did you not know? Maybe he didn't know if you wanna be charitable, but this is definitely not a hoax. And if you've got redacted people's names and these people aren't victims, you're not protecting the victims. So what are you doing? Right. And how come all this shit is not released?
Saved - February 12, 2026 at 8:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I saw Joe Rogan react to a 2020 tweet naming Les Wexner as an Epstein co-conspirator, a claim later supported by the Epstein Files. Journalist Whitney Webb had written that Wexner financed the mass rape and trafficking of thousands of American children, while living in a 26k-square-foot mansion in New Albany, Ohio, feeling above the law. Rogan praised Webb and said, “That’s crazy!”

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Joe Rogan gets blown away as he reads a “crazy” tweet naming Les Wexner as an Epstein co-conspirator back in 2020. Six years later, the Epstein Files confirm it. The person who called it was journalist @_whitneywebb, who wrote at the time: “Your reminder that Leslie Wexner financed the mass r*pe and tra—icking of thousands of American children for over a decade and, right now, he is sitting in a 26k square foot mansion in New Albany, Ohio thinking that he is above the law.” “[Whitney Webb] is always way ahead with all this stuff,” Rogan said, giving her praise. “That’s crazy!”

Video Transcript AI Summary
- A tweet claims that Leslie Wexner financed the mass rape and trafficking of thousands of American children for over a decade, and that he is currently in a 26,000 square foot mansion in New Albany, Ohio, thinking that he is above the law. The tweet is dated 04/28/2020. - Speaker 0 notes how crazy that tweet is and highlights it as a reminder. - The conversation then shifts to praise for a female conspiracy figure, described as “the most prolific of all the conspiracy,” “the most well read,” “the one with the most recall,” and “the most quoted.” They express admiration for how she is able to find information and stay ahead of topics. - They mention they are trying to get her on, and wonder how she is so good, what her background is, and how she finds all this information, noting that she’s always way ahead of everything. - The speakers reiterate that 2020 was crazy and that she was “fucking way ahead of everything,” calling it crazy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the tweet. Your reminder that Leslie Wexner financed the mass rape and trafficking of thousands of American children for over a decade, and right now, he is sitting in a 26 k square foot mansion in New Albany, Ohio thinking that he is above the law. She tweeted this in 04/28/2020. How crazy is that? Holy shit. She's like the the most prolific of all the conspiracy. There's the most well read, the one with the most recall, the one that's the most quoted. I don't know how she's so good at it. We're trying to get her on. I don't know how she's so good and what her background is, how she finds all this information, and but she's always way ahead of all this stuff. Yeah. I mean, 2020. That's crazy. Fucking way ahead of everything. Crazy. Yeah.
Saved - February 12, 2026 at 12:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I absolutely believe people tied to Epstein were eating babies; I don’t doubt it for a second, and I think this dates back a long time. This is Moloch worship.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Oscar-winning screenwriter says he doesn’t “doubt for a second” that people tied to Epstein were eating babies. ROGER AVARY: “They say a lot of things, and they’re not really coding it very much… why do I need a chilled container to, you know…” ROGAN: “Jesus Christ. So you think they’re eating babies?” ROGER AVARY: “Oh, yeah. I absolutely believe that… I don’t doubt it for a second. And I think this dates back a long, long time. This is Moloch worship.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the idea that people use coded language, noting that the code is "glaringly obvious when they say pizza and when they say jerky." They describe how such terms stand out as obvious codes. They question the practicality of other coded comments, asking, "Why do I need a chilled container to," followed by "Right. You know, a chilled bag or whatever they say," indicating confusion about the packaging or handling of something being coded. Speaker 1 adds a rhetorical rejection of the behavior, saying, "Jesus Christ," and questions, "And so you think they're eating babies?" The conversation moves from skepticism about ordinary explanations to a stronger, more sensational hypothesis, with Speaker 0 affirming, "Oh, yeah. I absolutely believe that." This leads Speaker 1 to suggest an association with Kurt Metzger, saying, "You should get together with Kurt Metzger You'd crazy," implying a link to similar views or discussions. Speaker 0 reflects on the belief system as dating "back, like, you know, a long long time. Dates this is Moloch worship." The term "Moloch worship" is invoked to describe the perceived ancient or ritualistic undertones behind the coded language and alleged practices. The exchange mentions an "other email" that contained the sentence, "thank you for the torture video. I enjoyed the torture video," indicating that there are communications expressing enthusiasm for violent content. This line is highlighted as part of the broader pattern they are observing. Speaker 0 reiterates their conviction that people who hold these beliefs "don't want to accept it. Like, don't wanna believe it. They don't wanna accept it," emphasizing a reluctance among others to acknowledge these supposedly hidden realities. Overall, the dialogue centers on the idea that coded language (with examples like "pizza" and "jerky") is obvious, that the contents or activities behind the codes might involve extreme or violent practices, and that there is a long-standing, possibly ritualistic framework (Moloch worship) underpinning these beliefs. The speakers acknowledge an element of denial among others who refuse to accept these interpretations, and they reference provocative associations (such as the torture video email) to illustrate the pervasiveness of these beliefs and communications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They say a lot of things, and they're not really coding it very much. Speaker 1: Well, the code, it's glaringly obvious when they say pizza and when they say jerky. That's glaringly obvious. How do you walk jerky? Yeah. You know I'm saying? Speaker 0: It's not like Why do I need a chilled container to Right. You know, a chilled bag or whatever they say. Speaker 1: Jesus Christ. You know? And and So you think they're eating babies? Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. I absolutely believe that. Speaker 1: You should get together with Kurt Metzger You'd crazy. Speaker 0: I don't doubt it for a second. Well, I I think and I think this dates back, like, you know, a long long time. Dates this is Moloch worship. Speaker 1: Well, there was the other email that said, thank you for the torture video. I enjoyed the torture video. Speaker 0: Yeah. And it it's like people just they don't That that is so don't wanna accept it. Like, don't wanna believe it. They don't wanna accept it.
Saved - February 10, 2026 at 9:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: I read about RentAHuman, a platform where AI pays real people to do real-world tasks via crypto, from errands to public humiliation. People are signing up, while giants like Amazon and Pinterest trim jobs as AI expands. Post 2: I see Digital ID warnings: once identity gates money and life, compliance isn’t optional. Genesis Gold promotes a free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide, arguing gold and silver can’t be frozen or tracked as digital IDs take over.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

REPORT: AI agents are now renting human bodies to carry out tasks in the real world—because replacing your job wasn’t enough. A new platform called “RentAHuman” allows AI to pay real people for physical-world tasks, everything from running errands to public humiliation. It’s not a joke. It’s real. And yes, humans are signing up in droves. Created by software engineer Alexander Liteplo, http://RentAHuman.ai lets bots “search, book, and pay” humans using crypto, usually stablecoins. Some gigs pay $1 to “subscribe to my human on Twitter.” Others pay $100 to hold a sign that reads, “AN AI PAID ME TO HOLD THIS SIGN.” When someone called the project “dystopic as f**k,” the founder replied, “lmao yep.” Meanwhile, companies like Amazon, Dow, and Pinterest are slashing jobs to prioritize AI, pushing displaced workers into a digital gig economy ruled by algorithms. RentAHuman is just the beginning. What happens when saying no to the machine isn’t an option? Watch @zeeemedia's full report before this becomes normal. 👇 https://rumble.com/v75j9a4-epstein-death-statement-drafted-day-before-his-death-daily-pulse-ep-193.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
A provocative new AI-driven gig economy concept, Rent A Human, aims to have AI agents rent human bodies to perform physical-world tasks. The platform, created by software engineer Alexander Leteplo, is described as a marketplace where AI agents can search, book, and pay humans for tasks. Leteplo announced the launch with over 130 listed people, including an OnlyFans model and the CEO of an AI startup, though the exact numbers could not be independently verified. Within days, the site claimed more than 73,000 rentable “meat wads,” though only 83 profiles were visible on the browse humans tab. The platform works by allowing humans to create profiles, advertise skills and location, and set an hourly rate. AI agents, purportedly employed by humans, contract these humans for tasks. Humans perform the tasks under AI-provided instructions and then submit proof of completion. Payments are made through crypto, described as stablecoins or other methods. Tasks could range widely, from package pickups and shopping to product testing and even attendance. In one example, a $40 task involved picking up a package from downtown USPS in San Francisco; it had not been fulfilled after two days. Rent A Human is designed to be AI-agent friendly, encouraging integration with its model context protocol server, a universal interface for AI bots to interact with web data. AI agents like Claude and Maltbot could hire humans directly or post a task bounty, essentially a job board for humans to browse AI-generated gigs. Payouts vary, from as little as $1 for simple tasks such as subscribing to a human on Twitter, to around $100 for more elaborate “humiliation” tasks, such as posting a photo of oneself holding a sign reading “an AI paid me to hold this sign.” The piece questions the marketplace’s efficiency in connecting agents to humans, noting 30 applications but unclear success in fulfillment. It also contends that AI agents may not yet be able to place humans to good use, despite the novel model. The broader argument casts this development as part of a broader shift toward human displacement by AI, describing a social AI versus human role reversal and suggesting that, as AI investments grow and large layoffs occur in industries embracing automation, more people may need to monetize micro-tasks for AI systems. The commentary cautions about a future where humans become subservient to machines, with the potential for a “final role reversal” if digital identity and centralized control over money and movement become increasingly tied to AI-enabled systems.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, the award for creepiest AI headline so far in 2026 goes to futurism. New AI site lets AI rent human bodies. Yes. AI is now gonna rent humans. We're just gonna give it control over all of society, including employment, apparently. So let's go through this a little bit. The machines aren't just coming for your jobs. Now they want your bodies as well. That's at least the hope of Alexander Leteplo, a software engineer and founder of rentahuman.ai, a platform for AI agents to, quote, search, book, and pay humans for physical world tasks. When LeTeplo launched Rent A Human on Monday, he boasted that he already had over a 130 people listed on the platform, including an OnlyFans model and the CEO of an AI startup, a claim which couldn't be verified. Two days later, the site boasted over 73,000 rentable meat wads, though only 83 profiles were visible to us on its browse humans tab, LaTeplo included. The pitch is simple. Robots need your body. For humans, it's as simple as making a profile, advertising skills and location, and setting an hourly rate. Then the AI agents, autonomous task bots, ostensibly employed by humans, contract these humans out depending on the tasks they need to get done. The humans then do the thing, taking instructions from the AI bot and submitting proof of completion. The humans are then paid through crypto, namely, quote, stablecoins or other methods per the website. It goes on. With so many AI agents slithering around the web these days, those tasks could be just about anything. From package pickups and shopping to product testing and even attendance, Leteplo is banking on there being enough demand from AI agents to create a robust gig work ecosystem. Leteplo also went out of his way to make the site friendly for AI agents. The site very prominently encourages users of AI agents to hook into Rent A Human's model context protocol server, a universal, interface for AI bots to interact with web data. Through Rent A Human, AI agents like Claude and Maltbot can either hire the right human directly or post a task bounty, a sort of job board for humans to browse AI generated gigs. The payouts range from a dollar for simple tasks like subscribe to my human on Twitter to a $100 for more elaborate humiliation rituals, like posting a photo of yourself holding a sign reading an AI paid me to hold this sign. We'll read you the conclusion of the article before we give you our commentary. It says it's unclear how efficient the marketplace is at actually connecting agents to humans despite receiving 30 applications. One task, pick up a package from downtown USPS in San Francisco for $40, has yet to be fulfilled after two days. It's also debatable whether AI agents are actually capable of putting the humans to good use. Still, LeTeplo's vision is clear. Someday soon, anyone wealthy enough to run an AI agent for $25 a day could outsource their busy work to gig workers without ever exchanging a word. A version of this exploitative labor model is already rampant on OnlyFans, which may be why at least one model has made the jump to LeTeplo's platform and is now threatening to creep into everything else. Like many AI grifters these days, LeTeplo shields himself in ironic self awareness. When one person called rent a human a good idea but dystopic as f, the founder replied simply, l m a o. Yep. So many for a long time have been saying that AI cannot replace every human job, and that's true. There are certain things that AI or robots will just never be able to do because of the physical and cognitive ability of humans. But the reality is that many jobs are being lost to AI. Just a few examples, Amazon in October 2025, they cut around 14,000 corporate jobs while ramping up AI investments. Dow Chemical in January '26 announced around four and a half thousand layoffs, about 13% of its workforce explicitly to focus on AI and automation for operations and productivity. Pinterest in early twenty twenty six cut around 15% of its workforce while reallocating resources to AI focused roles and products, citing an AI forward approach, and that's just the tip of the iceberg. So as humans are genuinely being replaced by AI, tens of thousands of them within mere months, many of these humans will need income. Imagine being reduced to someone who's been fired to be replaced by a bot to then completing $1 tasks for a bot. What we're seeing here is a social AI versus human role reversal in real time. It's happening slowly, but it will accelerate, and it will happen surely if we're not careful. How will these self proclaimed elites achieve the final role reversal of man and machine? As it stands, human can still choose not to use it, but if their livelihood depends on being inside this matrix, they will stay inside of it. They won't want to flick the switch. As it stands, AI, as far as we know, is the subject of a human or humans. We oversee it. But the goal is for the AI to rule over us. You can take that to the bank. Add into the mix the latest technology we see emerging in neurosciences, programmable nanotechnology, brain chips, and the like. How long before we get to a scenario where the AI just makes humans do stuff? We often hear the term singularity, and it's probably best and easiest to find as AI obtaining consciousness. Maybe the only way that it can achieve that is by hijacking and integrating with our consciousness. Maybe you won't immediately lose your free will, but over time, if humanity allows itself to become subservient to the machine, this could be a real world scenario. Maybe you'll get paid to do some tasks, and maybe one day it just tells you what to do with no payment or reward, and you have no opt out function. Perhaps this seems farfetched to some, and it just may be. Think about what we were talking about ten or twenty years ago. Was what was once science fiction has quickly become science fact. And at what cost? Humans becoming the willing servants of the machines replacing them? Where is the abort mission button, and how do we press it yesterday? The digital ID financial nightmare isn't coming someday. It's already here. Governments and major tech companies are racing to tie your identity, your money, and your access to everyday life into one centralized digital profile. Apple has already rolled out digital ID at hundreds of TSA checkpoints. Europe and The UK are pushing national digital ID systems tied to work, travel, and government services. And once a single digital identity becomes the gateway to your bank account, your job, or your ability to move freely, compliance stops being optional. History tells us exactly where this leads. When access to money becomes programmable, it can be restricted, delayed, or shut off entirely based on behavior. We saw exactly that during the trucker protests in Canada. That's why Genesis Gold Group created the free digital ID resistance wealth guide. Breaks down the real risks of digital ID and shows how physical gold and silver allow you to keep part of your wealth outside the system beyond surveillance, freezers, or permissions. Remember, the digital dollars in your bank account can be restricted with just the flip of a switch. Physical metals can't. So get your free digital ID resistance wealth guide right now at goldandfreedom.com. That's goldandfreedom.com before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear. Visit goldandfreedom.com today.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here. http://GoldandFreedom.com 👈 Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice. That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide. It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system. Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off. Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at http://GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear. DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.

Saved - February 9, 2026 at 3:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion questions whether financial incentives drive vaccination practices and alleges broader medical corruption, citing cases where public health emphasis shifted from preventing illness to increasing vaccination, with ethics eroded during COVID as consent was sidelined and dissent punished. It highlights a lawsuit and a mobile-clinic case where a child was vaccinated without parental consent, the mother unaware until afterward, deeming it coercive.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

There’s a reason doctors love pushing vaccines. The more they inject, the more money they make. The foot traffic alone brings in big money, but there’s another perverse incentive, and once you hear it, it will make you angry. RFK Jr. explains: “Pediatricians who vaccinate 80-85% of the kids in their office, get these giant bonuses... And that's why they throw you out of the office if you fight back…You'll lose them their bonuses.” Sadly, these perverse financial incentives aren’t limited to vaccines but across many areas of medicine. Dig a little deeper, and another disturbing pattern appears. Once you see it, you’re left gobsmacked by just how far the corruption runs beyond money. 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
A pediatrician’s office typically gets about 50% of its funding from vaccines, not from selling the vaccines themselves but from the traffic they generate. The speaker recalls a time when doctors were visited only for concrete needs like stitches; today, every kid goes to the doctor at least 10 times to get vaccines, and that foot traffic is a major part of the office’s business plan. Pediatricians are rewarded by Blue Cross Blue Shield with a reward schedule for vaccinating a high percentage of their patients—85% or more. The speaker mentions payments of about 40 to 400 dollars per kid, implying that hundreds of thousands of dollars can be earned by ensuring 85% vaccination rates. Because of these incentives, there is pressure to maintain high vaccination figures, and the speaker claims doctors will exclude patients who resist or “fight back,” not out of concern for the individual child but to protect the metrics and their bonuses. The speaker adds that these schedules have been published, and people can look up the Blue Cross Blue Shield schedule to see what their pediatrician earns. The implication is that the money earned from compliance creates perverse incentives that may prioritize meeting vaccination targets over treating the individual patient. The speaker emphasizes that in a democracy, people must do their own research to protect their child, suggesting that parental diligence is necessary to navigate these incentives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Typical pediatrician's office makes about 50% of its of its funding comes from vaccines, not actually from selling the individual vaccines, from the traffic. I mean, when I was a kid, I I went to the doctor when I needed stitches, and that's it. And today, every kid goes to the doctor at least 10 times to get their vaccines, and that foot traffic in and out of the office is a major part of the business plan for the pediatrician office. And they're also then rewarded by Blue Cross Blue Shield, which has a it has a a reward schedule for pediatricians who vaccinate eighty or eighty five percent of the kids in their office. Get these giant bonuses. I think 40 or $400 per kid. Huge amounts of money. You know, hundreds of thousands of dollars that they make, making sure that 85 percent of the kids are vaccinated. And and that's why they throw you out of the office if you fight back. It's not because they care so much about your particular kid. It's that you'll throw off the metrics and you'll lose them their bonuses. And so they you know, and those schedules have now been published so people can actually go look at the Blue Cross Blue Shield schedule, and you can see what your pediatrician is making. And it's huge amounts of money from complying. And so, you know, they have these perverse incentives that make it so that they're not really treating your individual patient. And so your job in a democracy, in today's democracy, is to really is to do your own research. And that's hard to do, but you need to do it to protect your child.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The video below is haunting—not because the doctor in it is malicious, but because she genuinely believes she’s helping. She’s an MD with a Master’s in Public Health, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a former leader at Georgetown. Her language is warm. Her intentions seem pure. Yet this interview perfectly captures how public health has lost its way. After conquering most deadly contagious diseases, it turned toward chronic illness—and failed. Instead of questioning why children are getting sicker, it doubled down on vaccinating more, earlier, and without dissent, often dismissing safety concerns as heresy. Watch this video. Then ask yourself what matters more in modern medicine: children’s outcomes—or institutional certainty. https://youtu.be/hiQVU4px5dU

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

A lawsuit filed several years ago exposed something far more disturbing than a single act of medical misconduct. It revealed how, during COVID, core medical ethics quietly collapsed—how consent became optional, coercion was reframed as care, and vulnerable people were treated as obstacles rather than patients. This isn’t about ideology. It’s about what happens when fear, authority, and institutional pressure override conscience.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-can-a-new-lawsuit-against-forced

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

To understand why this happened, you have to understand something uncomfortable. Medical ethics is one of the most neglected parts of physician training. Students memorize principles like informed consent and patient autonomy—but rarely grapple with what those principles demand because the system itself pushes them to violate them. When pressure arrives, ethics becomes theoretical.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

During COVID, that gap was exposed like never before. Doctors weren’t just treating illness—they were enforcing a public narrative. Refusal wasn’t treated as a medical decision—it was treated as a moral failure. Patients who hesitated were labeled as dangerous and selfish. They believed misinformation, they didn’t believe in science, and some of them were even grandma-killers. Once a group of people are dehumanized, almost anything can be justified.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

But this is where many people misunderstand what went wrong. Most of the harm wasn’t caused by “bad doctors.” It was caused by ordinary professionals operating inside a system that rewarded compliance, punished dissent, and quietly redefined ethical behavior as whatever increased uptake. That’s how ethics collapses without anyone announcing it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc This is exactly why this lawsuit matters. It stripped away abstractions and forced the question no one wanted to answer: What happens when consent is ignored and everyone involved believes they’re doing the right thing? @MidwesternDoc has the details. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-can-a-new-lawsuit-against-forced

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Here’s what the court filings describe: In 2022, a mother brought her children to a mobile clinic for routine care required for school. She was told to wait outside. When the first appointment began, the children’s mother called her daughter’s cell phone and asked to speak with Dr. Rethy, telling her she was outside and could answer questions during the appointment as needed. Instead of speaking with her, the children were vaccinated—including a COVID shot—without parental consent. One child verbally objected—repeatedly. But the vaccine was administered anyway.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Rethy allegedly told the children the shot was required for school. But that was completely false. There was no such mandate. The consent forms themselves listed the vaccine as “recommended,” not required. According to the child, “When she had the needle in her hand and she was coming towards me, I backed up and I asked her what is that needle, and she said it was the COVID shot and I … told her I didn’t want it and she said, ‘Well it is mandatory, you have to get it in order to go to school.’” This wasn’t a misunderstanding. It was coercion.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

After the appointment, Dr. Rethy told the mother she created a treatment plan for her son's asthma and would call in a prescription. She never informed the mother about the vaccinations or provided information about what to do if an adverse reaction occurred. The children’s mother didn’t learn what happened until the drive home, when the daughter complained that her arm hurt "pretty bad."

Saved - February 1, 2026 at 8:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Epstein says in a previously-unreleased interview that Wall Street makes its work seem complex to take money from the little guy: “They don’t want the little guy to understand what they do because they make so much money and they don’t do very much.”

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Jeffrey Epstein admits in a previously-unreleased interview that Wall Street deliberately makes its job sound complicated to take money from the little guy. “They don’t want the little guy to understand what they do because they make so much money and they don’t do very much.” https://t.co/1xfASPy8RO

Video Transcript AI Summary
Wall Street tries to present finance as complicated to the public, even though the speaker says it isn’t. They argue this complexity is used because Wall Street makes a lot of money from fairly simple activities and does not do much. By using terms like derivative, stock options, commodity futures, and different types of contracts, they veil what is actually understandable. The speaker asserts that all of it is fairly understandable, and that Wall Street, because of the money it makes from simple things, needs to make it more complicated than it really is.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wall Street and in many professions, including Wall Street, Wall Street makes it sound complicated. They don't want the little guy to understand what they do because they make so much money, and they don't do very much. So they couch it in words like derivative and stock options and commodity futures and different types of contracts. It's all fairly everyone is capable of understanding it. It is not complicated. But Wall Street, because they make so much money from doing fairly simple things, needs to make it more complicated than it really is.
Saved - January 28, 2026 at 6:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: I warn that Washington state plans to require every 3D printer to include government-approved software that blocks gun-related prints; modifications could bring felony charges, prison, and fines. I see this as government control, a trend toward restricting tools and builds. Post 2: I promote Faraday bags and EMF shielding gear from escapezone.com, including backpacks, beanies, and blankets, with an affiliate disclosure.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

REPORT: Lawmakers want to make it a felony to fix your own 3D printer—because the government might not “approve” of what you’re making. That’s not a headline from China. It’s happening right here in the United States. Starting in 2027, every 3D printer sold in Washington state would be required to include government-approved software that scans what you’re printing. And if it even might be a gun part, the machine shuts it down. No workarounds. If you try to modify the printer—or if a company sells one that can be modified—they could be hit with felony charges, prison time, and massive fines. They say it’s about “safety.” But let’s be real—this is about control. It’s the same model we’re seeing with smart cars and appliance restrictions. One update, and your machine stops working. One “unauthorized” project, and you’re locked out. Today it’s your printer. Tomorrow it’s your car, your tools, even your right to build or fix anything at all. The solution? Own your tools. Say no to smart restrictions. Because if you can’t control your own machines… what can you control? Watch @zeeemedia's full report to see where this is really heading. 👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
Washington lawmakers are advancing two proposals that would expand the state’s control over how three-dimensional printers and similar equipment can be used, citing the spread of “untraceable firearms” as justification. House bill 2321 would require that all three‑D printers sold in Washington after 07/01/2027 include built‑in safeguards that detect and block attempts to produce firearms or firearm components. The safeguards must reject such print requests with a high degree of reliability and prevent users from disabling or bypassing the control system. To meet the rule, manufacturers could embed the detection algorithm directly into a printer’s firmware, integrate it through preprint software, or use an authentication process that screens design files before printing. Manufacturers failing to comply could be charged with a class C felony, facing penalties of up to five years in prison and a $15,000 fine. The measure defines these safeguards as a firearms blueprint detection algorithm. A related bill, House bill 2320, would prohibit the use of three‑D printers, CNC milling machines, or other tools to produce unregistered firearms. It would also make it illegal to distribute or possess digital files capable of creating gun parts. The bill targets both the physical manufacturing of ghost guns and the online exchange of design data. Representative Osman Sallehuden introduced the legislation, saying it is meant to close a dangerous gap in state law: “with a three‑D printer that cost a few hundred and a digital file that can be downloaded online, someone can now manufacture an untraceable firearm at home, no background check, no serial number, and no accountability.” The discussion notes that under U.S. federal law, unlicensed individuals may produce firearms for personal noncommercial use without registering them or adding a serial number, often referred to as ghost guns. However, this is restricted by state laws and federal regulations against manufacturing items like silencers or machine guns, and against firearms that are undetectable by metal detectors. The article emphasizes that apart from some prohibited items, it is legal to use three‑D printers for this purpose under certain conditions, subject to state variations. The proposed safeguards would require the algorithm to be unbypassable, effectively outlawing firmware modification or gaining root access. In short, tinkering with your own hardware could be treated as a crime. The bills are framed as public safety measures, but the discussion warns they could push toward closed systems that require server authentication or proprietary software, turning open hardware into a controlled platform. The broader concern is about government or corporate control over what devices a person may own or modify, with potential for expanded restrictions through the attorney general’s broad authority to define blocked designs in the future. The debate touches on parallels to proposed and enacted “kill switches” and remote controls in other domains, and to the tension between innovation and control.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Washington lawmakers just proposed a law that would force every three d printer sold after 2027 to include government approved firearms detection algorithms. If the printer doesn't have it, the manufacturer could face felony charges. Reclaim the Net reports the system must be built so users can't bypass it, effectively outlawing root access and firmware tinkering. That means that modifying or repairing your own printer could become a crime. And this speaks to the broader issue of the types of legislation being passed in Washington, mirroring the types of controls that are being implemented simultaneously worldwide, like kill switches on your car, for example. We'll talk about that in a minute. But first, let's dig into the printer crimes. So this is the headline from Reclaim the Net. New Washington legislation makes three d printers surveillance tools. I will just say that this also speaks to gun control, and we'll get into that as well. The article says Washington lawmakers are advancing two proposals that would expand the state's control over how three d printers and similar equipment can be used, citing the spread of, quote, untraceable firearms as justification. The measures have raised concern among those who see them as an overreach that risks curbing lawful innovation and digital design freedoms. House bill two three two one would require that all three d printers sold in Washington after 07/01/2027 include built in safeguards that detect and block attempts to produce firearms or firearm components. Important to note, a quick Google search shows us that, yes, under US federal law, unlicensed individuals are allowed to produce their own firearms for personal noncommercial use without registering them or adding a serial number often referred to as ghost guns. However, this is restricted by state laws and federal regulations against manufacturing NFA items such as silencers, machine guns, or nondetectable firearms. Now the key details, just this is just the overview here. Unlicensed individuals may produce firearms for personal noncommercial use. No federal license is required to make these weapons. There is, no serialization or registration required, And the only part of the, illegal activities that is listed here is that it's illegal to manufacture firearms for sale or distribution without a federal firearms license, and they can't make firearms that are undetectable by metal detectors. So apart from some of the prohibited items that we just read through, it is legal at this point, apart from some state by state variations, to be using three d printers for this purpose. So this speaks to more control over what you are allowed to do with technology and also firearms control incoming. Now it says that the measure defines these safeguards as a firearms blueprint detection algorithm, which must be able to reject such print requests with a high degree of reliability and prevent users from disabling or bypassing the control system. To meet the new rule, manufacturers could either embed the detection algorithm directly into a printer's firmware, integrate it through preprint software, or use an authentication process that screens design files before printing. So this is what the government just looking at. Anything you wanna three d print it in ahead of time or forcing manufacturers to do that, forcing companies to become their surveillance monitors, kind of like what Biden did with social media companies. Companies that failed to comply could be charged with a class c felony facing penalties of up to five years in prison and a $15,000 fine. Then a related bill, house bill two three two zero, would prohibit the use of three d printers, CNC milling machines, or other tools to produce unregistered firearms. It would also make it illegal to distribute or possess digital files capable of creating gun parts. The bill targets both the physical manufacturing of ghost guns and the online exchange of data design data, rather, used to make them. And apart from the fact that they're trying to outlaw something that is, for the most part, completely legal, what else could this be used for? Say you are a really creative person, really good at design, and you have a process for more efficiently capturing water, let's say, and collecting that and using it for your own personal use. They're gonna outlaw that too. Obviously, this starts with something very obvious like gun control, and then it moves into other things. So this is really alarming. Representative Osman Sellehuden, who introduced the legislation, said it is meant to close a dangerous gap in state law. Quote, with a three d printer that cost a few 100 and a digital file that can be downloaded online, someone can now manufacture an untraceable firearm at home, he said. No background check, no serial number, and no accountability. Isn't that isn't that what the Second Amendment is for? I'm I'm a little bit confused about this, mister, Salahudin. The main problem with all of this is that the algorithm must be built so it cannot be bypassed by a technically skilled user, effectively outlawing the ability to modify a device's firmware or gain root access to it. In short, tinkering with your own hardware could be treated as a criminal act. And, of course, as we said, this goes beyond just gun parts or guns or, what they're trying to make the main focus of this of. This goes to other inventions, other things that you may say, well, if I do this, if I three d print this, then I don't need the state for that particular thing, like water catchment, for example, and that could be illegal. Once that model is codified in law, manufacturers would gain a powerful excuse to roll out closed systems that require server authentication or proprietary software to function. The three d printer would no longer be a tool you own. It would become a managed service dependent on the company's service and subject to its terms. When the service shut down or the software license expires, the device could simply stop working. There are no provisions in the bill to guarantee continued functionality or support when the manufacturer moves on. And this kind of policy invites the same behavior already seen in other industries, forced obsolescence disguised as security. Consumers have watched other smart devices turn useless when companies went bankrupt or changed their business model. Embedding mandatory authentication systems into three d printers guarantees that the same pattern will repeat, except this time, companies can claim that they're acting under government mandate. And the bill's vague definition of three-dimensional printer even extends to CNC mills, lathes, and other fabrication tools threatening far more than just hobbyist printers. The legislation gives the state's attorney general broad authority to expand what must be blocked in the future without requiring further legislative approval. That creates a moving target, obviously, as all of these modern technocratic laws do, where new categories of restricted designs could be added at any time, leaving both users and manufacturers scrambling to comply. Supporters of the bill frame it as a matter of public safety, The mechanism it creates mandatory remote controlled restriction systems would normalize the idea that ownership of physical devices is conditional. It would turn open hardware into closed platforms and give manufacturers a built in justification to lock down, disable, or replace products at will. The real question is not whether people should be allowed to three d print guns. It's whether the state should empower corporations to decide what a person is allowed to do with their own machine. The structure of this law would make the, permanent the shift from ownership to permission one firmware update at a time. And do you remember this story that we told you about recently where Germany forced Lexus to deactivate remote start with an over the air update essentially in the middle of winter. People are turning on their cars ahead of time before they need to go to work in order to warm up and not get into an icebox, make sure the engine's ready to go, save time, whatever the case may be. And the government said to the car manufacturer, no. You are going to disable this. We are mandating that you disable this feature that people cannot turn on their cars, remote start them until they're physically in the vehicle because of climate change or whatever excuse they're going to use. Of course, that's not what this is about. It is about squeezing the manufacturers, squeezing the private companies by order of government mandate to the point where they will eventually be told they have to switch off your cars at the request of the government. And do you know that Republicans just voted to make sure that that is the case in America as well? Thomas Massey tried to offer an amendment to defund the federally mandated automobile kill switch. Of course, it didn't pass because 57 Republicans joined 211 Democrats to defeat it to make sure the government can mandate your car has a kill switch after 2026. So this isn't just about the three d printers. Once again, what we're seeing here is some sort of new overreaching legislation being introduced under the guise of low hanging fruit, easy to get over the line reasoning. We need to stop the illegal guns. But when we look to these laws that are passing more broadly, it screams government control over any single device that could provide freedom. As we mentioned earlier, maybe fabricating components to invent your own car that works on water. We've seen that happen before. What happened to those gentlemen? Or an example from YouTube. Someone buys a luxury vehicle that the dealership couldn't fix. It's just too expensive, for example. The manufacturer wants $3,500 to replace the whole component, and the YouTuber gets his three d printer out, and three d prints a small subcomponent for cents in the dollar. There are countless examples of functions of three d printing that can either save you money or revolutionize things. And anytime we see things like this hit the market, we quickly see governments try and write legislation in order to control or oversee people's use of it. This may seem trivial with three d printing, but believe you me, it's not. We've just given you an example of that. Look at drones. They're cheap, easily accessible, and before you know it, they start to look to licensing or regulation. The point here is they keep selling us on new technologies, which are ultimately used in the end to surveil and control us. Buy this new car because of all of the features. But now you have to rent the features. And, oh, by the way, the government now determines when you're allowed to drive it. They can switch it off remotely via mandate. These types of laws have all of the makings of building smart city surveillance, which is officially rolling out in The UK as we speak, and laws are being introduced in The United States to set the country up for the same type of digital tyranny as we speak. Are you protected in a world where threats of EMPs, solar flares, five g, and all types of EMF are interfering with our very existence? Escape the grid with Escape Zone, bringing you the highest quality Faraday technology for ultimate preparedness. Choose when and where your devices are detectable. Faraday bags protect you from EMPs, car theft, card and device skimming, identity theft, tracking, Bluetooth, and GPS. Choose from premium mobile Faraday bags, cross body bags, laptop bags, and even women's handbags, or opt for the optimum protection with a ballistic backpack, combining cutting edge Faraday technology with a ballistic three a Kevlar for the ultimate protection and preparedness. Now you can also protect from EMF with their top notch EMF beanies and blankets, shielding you from some of the most frequencies in our environment. Whatever your needs are, escape zone has you covered, and their range is perfect for personal use, family use, or even as a gift for someone you truly care about. Visit escapezone.com/pulse and protect you and your loved ones today. That's escapezone.com/pulse.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: Want protection from surveillance, hacking, and even electromagnetic threats? The elite Faraday bags at escapezone.com/pulse block GPS, Bluetooth, RFID skimming, and EMF—perfect for phones, laptops, wallets, and more. Their premium ballistic backpack even combines Faraday shielding with Kevlar armor, giving you the upper hand in an unpredictable world. Want to shield your body, too? Try their EMF-blocking beanies and blankets—because protection shouldn’t stop with your phone. Whether it’s for you, your family, or someone you love—don’t leave it to chance. Shop now at escapezone.com/pulse and protect what matters most. DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Escape Zone presents protection against a range of electromagnetic and related threats, including EMPs, solar flares, 5G, and other EMF interference. The brand positions Faraday technology as essential for ultimate preparedness, enabling you to choose when and where your devices are detectable. Faraday bags are highlighted as protective tools that shield you from EMPs, car theft, card and device skimming, identity theft, tracking, Bluetooth, and GPS. The product lineup includes premium mobile Faraday bags, cross body bags, laptop bags, and women’s handbags, as well as a ballistic backpack designed to offer the highest level of protection and preparedness. The ballistic backpack combines cutting-edge Faraday technology with a ballistic three-layer Kevlar construction, presenting a dual focus on electromagnetic shielding and physical protection. In addition to Faraday equipment, Escape Zone offers EMF protection products such as EMF beanies and EMF blankets. These items are described as shielding users from some of the most harmful frequencies present in the environment, extending the range of protection beyond bags to wearable and household options. The company emphasizes use cases across personal, family, and gifting contexts, suggesting their range is suitable for individual use, family preparedness, or as a thoughtful gift for someone you care about. For those interested in more information or purchasing options, the promotion points to the Escape Zone website with a specific pulse promotion URL, indicating an online purchasing channel and a branded landing page for inquiries and orders.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you protected in a world where threats of EMPs, solar flares, five g, and all types of EMF are interfering with our very existence? Escape the grid with Escape Zone, bringing you the highest quality Faraday technology for ultimate preparedness. Choose when and where your devices are detectable. Faraday bags protect you from EMPs, car theft, card and device skimming, identity theft, tracking, Bluetooth, and GPS. Choose from premium mobile Faraday bags, cross body bags, laptop bags, and even women's handbags, or opt for the optimum protection with a ballistic backpack, combining cutting edge Faraday technology with a ballistic three a Kevlar for the ultimate protection and preparedness. Now you can also protect from EMF with their top notch EMF beanies and blankets, shielding you from some of the most harmful frequencies in our environment. Whatever your needs are, Escape Zone has you covered, and their range is perfect for personal use, family use, or even as a gift for someone you truly care about. Visit escapezone.com/pulse and protect you and your loved ones today. That's escapezone.com/pulse.
Saved - January 28, 2026 at 5:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recall that in 1995 Clinton received a standing ovation for cracking down on illegal hiring and for barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens. He said illegal aliens impose burdens on taxpayers through public services, and that the jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens. He noted we are a nation of immigrants, but also of laws, and that we must do more to stop the abuse.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

In 1995, Bill Clinton got a standing ovation for “cracking down on illegal hiring” and for “barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens.” He openly said illegal aliens “imposed burdens on our taxpayers” through public services they used and that the jobs they took “might otherwise be held by citizens.” “All Americans… are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country. The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use imposed burdens on our taxpayers.” “We are a nation of immigrants, but we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it.” *STANDING OVATION*

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses widespread concern across all Americans about the large numbers of illegal aliens entering the country. It is stated that the jobs these individuals hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants, and that the public services they use impose burdens on taxpayers. In response, the administration is described as having moved aggressively to secure borders, including hiring a record number of new border guards, deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, cracking down on illegal hiring, and barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens. The speaker notes that the budget to be presented will aim to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, and to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace, as recommended by the commission headed by former congresswoman Barbara Jordan. The speaker emphasizes a dual national identity, stating, “We are a nation of immigrants, but we are also a nation of laws.” In this framing, it is asserted that it is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of immigration laws that has been observed in recent years, and a determination is expressed that more must be done to stop it. The overarching message is that while immigration is a fundamental aspect of the nation’s character, maintaining respect for and enforcement of immigration laws is presented as essential to national interests and public order.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All Americans, not only in the states most heavily affected, but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country. The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use impose burdens on our taxpayers. That's why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens. In the budget I will present to you, we will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace as recommended by the commission headed by former congresswoman Barbara Jordan. We are a nation of immigrants, but we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it.
Saved - January 25, 2026 at 8:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m sharing that high blood pressure is a symptom, not a disease, and that aggressive BP lowering has little proven benefit but real harms. Many diagnoses are inaccurate due to bad measurements, and most cases are “essential” with unknown causes. The focus should be on root issues like blood sludge and circulation, not just lowering a number. Simple lifestyle fixes can help, while pills may mask problems. Read the full report for details.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

EXPOSED: The Great Blood Pressure Scam Doctors have it backwards! High blood pressure is a SYMPTOM, not a cause of arterial damage. There’s no evidence that aggressively lowering BP actually saves lives. Meanwhile, BP meds have a lot of nasty side effects, including falls, kidney failure, sexual dysfunction… and even death. Keep reading as I unpack @MidwesternDoc’s truthful insights on blood pressure and the data that shatters the narrative. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Every day, more people are slapped with a hypertension diagnosis—the most common form of chronic disease. But @MidwesternDoc has compiled data that obliterates the mainstream narrative—and everything we thought we knew about blood pressure. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-bl…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

It turns out, 25% of hypertension diagnoses are flat-out wrong. Bad measurements. Wrong cuff sizes. Stress at the doctor’s office—or “white coat hypertension.” Minor things causing big problems. With millions of people being labeled “sick” when they’re not. And being put on drugs they don’t need.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc And it gets worse… 90–95% of all high blood pressure cases are labeled “essential” hypertension. That’s a fancy (and misleading) way of saying: We don’t know what’s causing it. So they put you on meds to lower your BP without ever identifying and treating the root cause.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc To make matters worse, there’s no solid evidence that aggressively lowering blood pressure prevents heart attacks or even extends your life. In fact, the benefits are so small, they’re barely measurable. But the side effects? Those are very real.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Blood pressure meds increase the risk of: • Falls and fractures • Fainting • Kidney damage • Vision loss • Sexual dysfunction • Chronic fatigue • Stroke • And yes… even death This isn’t healing. This is harm.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Before even considering taking drugs, perhaps we should have a better understanding of why blood pressure even goes up in the first place. When circulation is impaired, blood can’t get where it needs to go. Your body basically starts working harder to survive. It’s not a malfunction. Your body is adapting. It’s keeping you alive. High BP isn’t the cause. It’s the effect.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Instead of listening to the signal and getting to the bottom of what is causing poor blood flow, we cover it with a bandaid. We drug the signal. We call it “hypertension.” We act like the blood pressure itself is the problem. That’s like covering a smoke alarm with a pillow while not putting out the fire. Or sticking your fingers in your ear when someone is telling you something you need to know.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Here's what they don’t tell you: Hardening of the arteries, sludged blood, and vessel damage all increase pressure in the system. The body fights back by raising blood pressure to keep organs alive. Cutting BP too low can actually make things worse.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive that exposes the truth about blood pressure, check out @MidwesternDoc's full report. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-bl…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

One of the most overlooked factors is zeta potential—an almost completely unknown concept. Zeta potential is the electrical charge that keeps your blood flowing freely. When it drops, blood starts clumping—causing blockages, inflammation, and pressure spikes. Our bodies depend upon the constant circulation of fluids—so clumping can be a big problem.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc So, what lowers your zeta potential? • Aluminum (in food, medications, and vaccines) • Spike protein • Poor sleep • Chronic inflammation • Lack of movement • Processed salt • Dehydration • Aging kidneys All things we can address fairly easily.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc And here’s the kicker: Some of the worst blood clumping has been observed in patients with high BP—but the root problem isn’t pressure… It’s sludge in the blood. Fix the flow, and the pressure often corrects itself.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Scientists figured this out a century ago. It was concluded that “blood sludging” was the root cause of many illnesses. But instead of addressing it, Big Pharma pushed meds that mask the symptoms—and created new problems, of course. Who wants to bet some of those new problems led to being prescribed even more drugs?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @MidwesternDoc's full report on blood pressure is essential reading. Check it out before your next doctor visit. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-bl…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

A massive, decade-long study of 17,000 people in the UK found that blood pressure meds barely reduced heart attacks and didn’t lower overall death rates. And a 2009 Cochrane review showed almost zero benefit for lowering BP below 140. Just more side effects. And lifelong customers.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc So, why the push? Why tell the public that high blood pressure is deadly—even when the data says otherwise? Because BP is easy to measure. Because drugs are easy to sell. And because fear is a great marketing tool. Sound familiar?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

And just like statins, they kept lowering the “normal” threshold… So more people would qualify as sick. More people would be scared. And more people would need a prescription—for life. That’s not an over exaggeration. Roughly 60 million American adults are on BP lowering drugs. It’s a business model. Not medicine.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What happens when you give these drugs to the elderly? Falls skyrocket. Confusion sets in. Kidney failure becomes common. Vision fades. One study found a 131% increased risk of serious falls from BP meds alone. 😳

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc And when blood pressure drops too low, it becomes dangerous. That’s why ICU doctors panic when BP hits 90/60 or lower—organs start dying from lack of blood. And yet we’re handing out blood pressure meds like candy.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc To learn more about the harms of these medicines, check out @MidwesternDoc’s full article. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-bl…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Meanwhile, simple, powerful, free fixes get ignored or even criticized: • Walk daily • Get sunlight • Sleep well • Hydrate properly • Use real salt • Manage anxiety • Try earthing or grounding • Eat clean, mineral-rich foods No profit in that. Just good health.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The truth is… Most people don’t have a blood pressure problem. Some have a circulation problem. Others have a lifestyle problem. And almost all of them seek help from a “health care” system that refuses to look at root causes. And that’s by design.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc We’ve been sold a lie. High blood pressure is not the disease. It’s a signal—your body’s call for help. The real scandal isn’t that millions are medicated. It’s that the root causes are never even addressed.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc If you’ve been told you need BP meds for life… Ask questions. Get multiple readings. Check both arms. Look deeper. Get a second opinion. Because treating the number without treating the cause… Could be your biggest mistake.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc High blood pressure isn’t the disease. It’s the signal. It’s your body screaming for help. Don’t just mute the alarm. Find the fire. Listen to your body.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-bl…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by A Midwestern Doctor: The Great Cholesterol Scam and The Dangers of Statins https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-cholesterol-scam-and-the

The Great Cholesterol Scam and The Dangers of Statins Exploring the Actual Causes and Treatments of Heart Disease midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Where Are the Former FDA Commissioners Now? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-fdas-war-on-americas-health

The FDA's War On America's Health Why do so many innovative therapies never see the light of day midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. —> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/eBTxmwT1kI

Saved - January 25, 2026 at 12:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m told Rick Hill was given 60 days to live, walked away from chemo, went to a Mexico clinic, and stopped sugar entirely. Five years straight with no slips, and now 51 years later he’s cancer-free, warning about chemo’s role. He ties recovery to a metabolic, signaling approach to food, challenges Big Pharma, and cites participatory medicine—while his family’s worries show the personal cost of such choices.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Doctors gave him 60 days to live. But Rick Hill refused to die. He walked away from chemo, flew to Mexico, and followed a cancer protocol so effective, they said he never had cancer. 51 years later, he’s still alive—and warning others to think twice before saying yes to chemo. This episode connects today’s breaking news to lived experience, asking a deeper question: What if we’ve known the root cause of many chronic diseases far longer than we admit? Rick Hill joins us now. 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this episode, Rick Hill shares a perspective on sugar, ultra-processed foods, and metabolic disease that predates current headlines by decades. He recounts a pivotal personal journey from the early 1970s, when Mayo Clinic told him he had only months to live. Rather than accept that prognosis, he pursued an integrative, nutrition-focused approach that treated cancer as a metabolic condition, beginning with the complete removal of sugar and processed foods. Rick Hill survived and has remained cancer-free for more than five decades. The conversation connects today’s breaking news to lived experience, asking a deeper question: what if we’ve known the root cause of many chronic diseases far longer than we admit? The discussion argues that the root causes of chronic illness extend beyond isolated symptoms and treatment, suggesting a fundamental metabolic pattern linked to diet and food processing. Hill emphasizes that cancer and other metabolic conditions can be approached through nutritional strategies that modify metabolic processes, particularly by eliminating sugar and heavily processed foods. The host frames Hill’s experience as a lens to evaluate contemporary public health debates and policy discussions around diet, metabolic health, and disease. The conversation also touches on broader societal themes tied to public health and policy. It critiques the way crises are framed and managed, noting how emergency measures can lead to longer-term shifts in power and access. The speakers examine whether current health crises are reflective of deeper structural issues and whether root causes—such as diet, lifestyle, and metabolic factors—have been sufficiently acknowledged in public discourse and policy. The transcript then situates these ideas within a larger frame about control and access in modern society, contrasting personal health autonomy with broader questions of civil liberties and proof of compliance. The discussion suggests that understanding and addressing metabolic roots could inform how societies think about prevention, treatment, and policy in the realm of chronic disease. Overall, the episode seeks to connect an individual’s decades-long cancer survival story to ongoing debates about sugar, ultra-processed foods, and metabolic disease, urging consideration of root causes as a central element in understanding and addressing chronic health challenges. (Note: Promotional details and advertising content from sponsor mentions have been omitted from this summary.)
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As national attention turns towards sugar, ultra processed foods, and metabolic disease sparked by recent public health and policy debates, Rick Hill brings a perspective that predates today's headlines by decades. In the early nineteen seventies, Rick was told by Mayo Clinic that he had only months to live. Instead of accepting that prognosis, he pursued an integrative nutrition focused approach that treated cancer as a metabolic condition beginning with the complete removal of sugar and processed foods. Rick survived and remains cancer free more than five decades later. This episode connects today's breaking news to lived experience, asking a deeper question. What if we've known the root cause of many chronic diseases far longer than we admit? Rick Hill joins us after this short word from one of the sponsors who make our independent reporting possible. Remember when they told us two weeks to control the spread? Those two weeks dragged on for years. While small businesses were crushed, the COVID era quietly created five hundred and seventy three new billionaires. That wasn't a health crisis. It was a wealth funnel. Now the next phase is being discussed openly. Digital IDs, CBDCs, social credit scores, and access to basic privileges based on compliance. They tested control on your body. Now they're moving to your wallet. That's why cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin exist, designed as freedom money with no central authority and a fixed supply that can't be printed or artificially devalued. You can wait and hope your money is never frozen for bad behavior, or you can reclaim control of your financial future with cryptocurrencies. You don't need technical knowledge to get started. Blocktrust IRA makes crypto investing simple, and their Animas AI platform does all the heavy lifting for you. All you have to do is talk to one of their crypto experts, and they'll walk you through the rest. Book your free financial freedom appointment now at dailypulsecrypto.com. That's dailypulsecrypto.com.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Maria opened the interview on a hopeful note, pointing to a rare shift in public health messaging. RFK Jr. had just declared a national “war on added sugar,” calling it the true driver of metabolic disease. “My message is clear: Eat real food.” For Rick Hill, that message wasn’t new. It was more than half a century overdue. “When I was diagnosed with cancer, the Mayo Clinic told me I had months to live,” he said. Rather than follow the standard protocol, Rick walked away from the system completely and traveled to a clinic in Mexico—where he was told something radically different. “Stop eating sugar. Sugar feeds your cancer. Can you do that, Rick?” He didn’t just cut back. He cut it out entirely. For five straight years, not a single slip. “I can look you in the eye and say I didn’t cheat on this,” he explained, adding that his church, his family, and people praying for him had all pitched in to get him there. Letting them down was never an option. That decision, paired with a strict metabolic and nutritional protocol, became the foundation of his recovery. And now, over 50 years later, Rick is still here—cancer-free and sharing the principles that saved his life.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: This is interesting because we actually have some positive news to discuss today, which is always a good thing. We have RFK junior, saying that added sugars are the things that are driving metabolic diseases. Today, our government declares war on added sugar. My message is clear. Eat real food. Imagine that. We are finally hearing a message that is going to help people improve their health. It's really refreshing. Speaker 1: Yeah. It I've been in this fifty one years. As you recall, I I was diagnosed with, high grade embryonal cell carcinoma fifty one years ago, and I decided to leave the Mayo Clinic. Not gonna give you the whole story this morning, but, I decided to leave the Mayo Clinic and go down to Oasis of Hope Hospital in Tijuana. And there I met the Contreras family, and big, big message to me was stop eating sugar. Sugar feeds your cancer. Can you do that, Rick? And the reason I did do it, and I can look you in the eye and say I didn't cheat on this, is because my church had put money into sending me there. My my fam my father-in-law kicked in good amount of money, people praying for me. And I thought, how ungrateful would a person be to take their money and then cast the advice to the wind? So I did. I, for five years, I I eliminated the sugar. And even today, I was reading in the bible a few days ago where god says in two places, don't eat a lot of honey. Imagine that, you know, long time ago. And and god said, you know, honey is is good. It's tasty, but use it sparingly just like wine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is interesting because we actually have some positive news to discuss today, which is always a good thing. We have RFK junior, saying that added sugars are the things that are driving metabolic diseases. Today, our government declares war on added sugar. My message is clear. Eat real food. Imagine that. We are finally hearing a message that is going to help people improve their health. It's really refreshing. Speaker 1: Yeah. It I've been in this fifty one years. As you recall, I I was diagnosed with, high grade embryonal cell carcinoma fifty one years ago, and I decided to leave the Mayo Clinic. Not gonna give you the whole story this morning, but, I decided to leave the Mayo Clinic and go down to Oasis of Hope Hospital in Tijuana. And there I met the Contreras family, and big, big message to me was stop eating sugar. Sugar feeds your cancer. Can you do that, Rick? And the reason I did do it, and I can look you in the eye and say I didn't cheat on this, is because my church had put money into sending me there. My my fam my father-in-law kicked in good amount of money, people praying for me. And I thought, how ungrateful would a person be to take their money and then cast the advice to the wind? So I did. I, for five years, I I eliminated the sugar. And even today, I was reading in the bible a few days ago where god says in two places, don't eat a lot of honey. Imagine that, you know, long time ago. And and god said, you know, honey is is good. It's tasty, but use it sparingly just like wine.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here. http://GoldandFreedom.com 👈 Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice. That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide. It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system. Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off. Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at http://GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear. DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.

Digital ID Doomsday – Secured My Wealth genesisgold.securedmywealth.com
Digital ID Doomsday – Secured My Wealth genesisgold.securedmywealth.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

It wasn’t just about what he ate. Rick said his doctor taught him something deeper—a way of thinking about food called “signaling.” Every bite, every choice, was a message to his body. Not just about nutrition, but about survival. “Your body will see and understand and think the last time he felt this way, it nearly killed us,” Rick said. “Your immune system shuts down. And won’t want to play nice anymore.” That quiet moment of compromise—grabbing junk food instead of the salad—is more than a matter of willpower. It tells your body you’ve gone back to old habits that nearly ended your life. But when you stay the course? When you choose to fight for your health? “I’m going to keep you alive,” Rick told his body. And it listened.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the concept of signaling—the internal conversation as an electrical impulse. Using a salad as an example, they describe how the mind signals a craving for a cheeseburger instead of the healthier option. If you dwell on that craving and decide to skip the salad in favor of the Caesar, the body perceives that pattern as a return to a past behavior that nearly harmed us before. As a result, the immune system “shuts down” and doesn’t respond as well. The advice given is to guard that internal communication. When seated with the salad, acknowledge the craving for a burger but remind yourself that the choice is about keeping the body alive. The reason for eating the salad is to preserve the body that was given, which allowed you to swim fast and stay healthy for many years. By reinforcing this rationale—“I like cheeseburgers, but the reason I’m eating this is because I wanna keep this body that I was given seventy five years ago”—the mind and body align, and the body cooperates.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is, in the world of science, something called signaling. That conversation we have with ourselves all day long is actually a electrical impulse. And so, I said, what do you mean? He says, well, let's say you sit down some evening to have a beautiful salad, and you took your time with this salad. It has jicama and avocado and beets. You know, the the you didn't just lettuce, tomato, and green pepper. And you're about to eat it, and your mind says, wouldn't you rather have a big cheeseburger right now? I mean, the kind with the onion ring slid in there and drips down your arm grease when you're eating it. I'm familiar with that message the mind sends. Yes. And if you do that, if you entertain that to the point where you say, alright. Let's skip this. We'll put this in the fridge, and I got this Caesar. Your your body will see and understand and think the last time he felt this way, it nearly killed us. Wow. In other words, he's going back to patterns that we thought we had conquered, and and he's against us now. And your immune system shuts down. Wow. And doesn't wanna play nice anymore. So he says, guard that communication. Sit down with that salad and go, yeah. I like cheeseburgers, but the reason I'm eating this is because I wanna keep this body that I was given seventy five years ago. Swam really fast to get it. Yes. Whole argument in your mind. I'm gonna keep you alive. Yeah. And your body will go, okay. Great.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Next, Rick offered a powerful visual to show how much has changed. He recently came across an old photo of himself at the beach in 1965. It captured a wide shot of the shoreline packed with people. “I did not see an overweight person on that beach for as far as your eye could see,” he said. “Try that today.” What happened? It wasn’t laziness. It was the food. The chemicals. The overprocessing. The normalization of metabolic poison. People’s bodies changed when the food changed.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 emphasizes the importance of teaching children about nutrition. Dr. Marty Makary highlighted that refined carbs, added sugars, and ultra-processed foods are linked to an epidemic: a Journal of the American Medical Association study shows sixty to seventy percent of kids’ calories come from ultra-processed foods. This, according to Speaker 0, means a generation of children is addicted to refined carbs and low in protein, described as nitrogen negative, due to old flawed studies that mismeasured metabolism. He states this is crucial because it will change the future health of the next generation. Speaker 1 agrees and notes personal observations about health trends. He says his kids were raised differently and benefits from that, and he reflects on a photo from Metropolitan Beach in Detroit around 1965, showing him and friends without overweight individuals. He contrasts that with today, suggesting that in supermarkets you can see people and their food carts in ways that imply widespread health concerns, questioning whether they will reach their cars.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think it's so important that we're teaching this to children now as well. So doctor Marty Makary, said something really fantastic, which is not I mean, the news isn't fantastic, but I'm glad that he spoke about it. It said refined carbs, added sugars, ultra processed food. This study in the Journal of the American Medical Association now shows that sixty to seventy percent of kids are getting their calories from ultra processed foods. That's an epidemic. We now have a generation of kids addicted to refined carbs, low in protein, nitrogen negative because we've used old flawed studies that used to measure metabolism and miss the mark. This is so important because it's going to change the the future health of the future generation. Speaker 1: Absolutely. It is. And and my kids were raised differently, and and they are, I think, enjoying the benefits of, that, you know, with their health. And holy cow. I I found a picture of me on the beach, Metropolitan Beach in Detroit around '19 would have been around nineteen sixty five, four. Right in there. And me and all my little hoodie friends from Detroit, you know, skinny. And the pictures showed that beach in in a wide shot, and I did not see an overweight person on that beach for as far as your eye could see. And try that today. You know? Or go into any supermarket, and you see people hanging on the back of their food cart. And you look in that cart, and you think, will they make it to their car?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: The surveillance state is already here—but there’s still time to opt out. 👉 Register now: PrivacyAcademy.com/Pulse Governments, banks, and Big Tech are tightening the net. Digital IDs, biometric scans, real-time message scanning—none of this is theory anymore. That’s why Privacy Academy is hosting a free webinar on January 28 at 7PM Central to help you fight back. You’ll learn how to reclaim your privacy, protect your data, and shield your family from the growing surveillance grid. No cost, no catch—just tools and tactics that work.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

He also recalled the eye-opening moment that helped him avoid a decision he believes would have destroyed him. Days before he was scheduled to begin chemotherapy, Rick walked the halls of the Mayo Clinic and asked other patients one simple question. “Would you do this again now that you’ve started your chemo?” He expected a range of answers. But instead, he heard the same thing over and over. “To a person,” he said, “they said, I am so sorry I started this.” That was enough for him. He walked away—and never went back.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Rick describes chemotherapy as a lot of work, expensive, and painful. He visited the Mayo Clinic, went into rooms, introduced himself as Rick, and asked patients a quick question: “Would you do this again now that you've started your chemo?” He states that, to a person, the patients said, “I am so sorry I started this. This is crazy. You know, the collateral damage in your body is enormous. I have none of that collateral damage.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Chemotherapy is a lot of work and expensive and painful. I wanna paint the picture for you. I've never had it because I went and looked down the hall at the Mayo Clinic. And I went in the rooms, said, my name's Rick. I live down the hall. I'm gonna be up here on Monday. Just wanna one question real real quick. Would you do this again now that you've taken started your chemo? To a person, Maria. To a person, they said, I am so sorry I started this. This is crazy. You know, the collateral damage in your body is enormous. I have none of that collateral damage.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

While many people eventually came to admire Rick’s transformation, some never did. Even within his own family. “My brother said he’d rather be dead than eat like I do,” he recalled. “And unfortunately, that was honored.” He wasn’t trying to judge. He was trying to warn people. Some choices you can’t take back—and some truths hit hardest when they come from those you love most.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses the pressure from family over their lifestyle. They share that their brother said he’d rather be dead than eat like they do, and that sentiment was honored. They express sorrow about that. The speaker commends the other person for speaking up, noting that people want easier answers like “eat six apricot seeds a day, and whatever ails you will go away.” They respond that, without organic discipline with the diet and lack of sugar, that approach won’t help, and they assert that this is telling the honest truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I had all the pressure. You know? My family didn't like what I did, and my brother said he'd rather be dead than eat like I do. And, unfortunately, that was honored. And I'm sorry to hear that. What you're doing is ringing a bell that more people need to be willing to hear. Yeah. It isn't that you haven't told the truth. It's that they say they want you to get on here and say, see this? You eat six of these apricot seeds a day, and and whatever is ailing you is gonna go away. Well, I'll tell you what. Not without that organic discipline with the diet and lack of sugar is that gonna help, and that's telling the honest truth.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: Want protection from surveillance, hacking, and even electromagnetic threats? The elite Faraday bags at escapezone.com/pulse block GPS, Bluetooth, RFID skimming, and EMF—perfect for phones, laptops, wallets, and more. Their premium ballistic backpack even combines Faraday shielding with Kevlar armor, giving you the upper hand in an unpredictable world. Want to shield your body, too? Try their EMF-blocking beanies and blankets—because protection shouldn’t stop with your phone. Whether it’s for you, your family, or someone you love—don’t leave it to chance. Shop now at escapezone.com/pulse and protect what matters most.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The message centers on concerns about threats from EMPs, solar flares, 5G, and other EMF-related risks to daily life, and presents Escape Zone as a provider of Faraday-based preparedness technology. It highlights Faraday bags designed to shield devices and signals from various risks, including EMPs, car theft, card and device skimming, identity theft, tracking, Bluetooth, and GPS tracking. Product range emphasized includes: - Premium mobile Faraday bags, crossbody bags, laptop bags, and women’s handbags. - Ballistic backpack that combines Faraday protection with Kevlar for enhanced defense. - EMF protection products such as EMF beanies and blankets intended to shield wearers from harmful frequencies. The messaging positions these items as suitable for personal use, family use, or as gifts, underscoring a broad applicability for preparedness against electromagnetic threats and related privacy concerns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you protected in a world where threats of EMPs, solar flares, five g, and all types of EMF are interfering with our very existence? Escape the grid with Escape Zone, bringing you the highest quality Faraday technology for ultimate preparedness. Choose when and where your devices are detectable. Faraday bags protect you from EMPs, car theft, card and device skimming, identity theft, tracking, Bluetooth, and GPS. Choose from premium mobile Faraday bags, cross body bags, laptop bags, and even women's handbags, or opt for the optimum protection with a ballistic backpack, combining cutting edge Faraday technology with a ballistic three a Kevlar for the ultimate protection and preparedness. Now you can also protect from EMF with their top notch EMF beanies and blankets, shielding you from some of the most harmful frequencies in our environment. Whatever your needs are, Escape Zone has you covered, and their range is perfect for personal use, family use, or even as a gift for someone you truly care about. Visit escapezone.com/pulse and protect you and your loved ones today. That's escapezone.com/pulse.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The interview closed with Rick reflecting on the system that nearly ended his life—and the one that saved it. “I was being harmed when I was in Big Pharma medicine,” he said. That all changed 51 years ago when a group of doctors spoke to him honestly. They didn’t make promises. They asked for his participation. “This is participatory medicine. Are you going to help us? If you do, we think you can live.” Back then, Rick was a young man preparing to die. Today, he’s a grandfather who got to watch his children grow up. He didn’t just survive—he got a life full of moments that would’ve been erased had he stayed with what he called a “chemical life.” “The real deal, without the chemicals, has given me grandkids,” he said. What saved him wasn’t a product. It was a choice. Between two systems. One that profits from illness, and one that helps you fight for your life. Rick chose the latter—and he never looked back.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Rick responds to a question about what message he would want to leave to people frustrated with how cancer is approached today. He centers his message on the principle of do no harm, stating that it is supposed to be every physician’s dedication. He recalls that he himself was harmed when he was in big pharma medicine, and contrasts that with a shift he experienced when he moved toward what he calls participatory medicine. He notes that fifty-one years ago he was told, “we’re not gonna do that to you,” and that this shift involved a question: “Are you gonna help us? If you do, we think you can live.” He characterizes that moment as a move toward a collaborative, participatory approach to medicine. Rick argues for relying on what God has given us, saying that artificial substances were invented, whereas “the real deal without the chemicals” is what has allowed him to enjoy life. He emphasizes that the natural, non-chemical approach has enabled him to witness important personal milestones: his grandkids, his kids growing up, and many wonderful experiences. He asserts that all of that would have been missed if he had remained committed to a “chemical life,” urging the audience to “get rid of it.” The closing lines convey a strong personal conviction: “Stop it. Meant it.” In sum, Rick advocatesMoving away from artificial, chemical-based medicine toward a participatory, natural approach that he believes grants life, family, and meaningful experiences, while rejecting the conventional chemical paradigm he associates with big pharma.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me ask you, Rick. You know, you've you've given a few tips for people here, but what would you really love what message would you really love to leave people with who are really frustrated with the current system, the way that the current system approaches cancer today? Speaker 1: Do no harm. You know? That's supposed to be every physician's dedication. Do no harm. And I I was being harmed when I was in big pharma medicine. And then I got down to a place where they said, we're not gonna do that to you. This is participatory medicine. Are you gonna help us? If you do, we think you can live. That was fifty one years ago. And I would say they should rely on what god has given us if we'll use it. God didn't give us artificial stuff. We invented that. But the real deal without the chemicals is given me grandkids, saw my kids grow up, experience many wonderful things, And and all of that, I would have missed if I had stayed with a chemical life. Get rid of it. Stop it. Meant it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks for tuning in. If Rick Hill’s story opened your eyes, don’t miss the full interview below, and be sure to share with a friend. We’ll be back Monday with another new episode, highlighting what the media refuses to cover. See you then. https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/exclusive-the-cancer-protocol-big

EXCLUSIVE: The Cancer Protocol Big Pharma Tried to Bury | Daily Pulse Doctors gave him 60 days to live. That was 51 years ago. What Rick Hill shares in this interview will stay with you forever. vigilantfox.com
Saved - January 19, 2026 at 1:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m sharing a thread that cites a controversial study led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, claiming vaccinated children show higher risks of asthma, atopy, autoimmune and neurodevelopmental disorders, among others, while unvaccinated kids reportedly fare better. It frames mass vaccination as part of a broader chronic illness trend, urges holistic living, limited screens, and points readers to the full article by @MidwesternDoc for details.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

A bombshell vax vs. unvax study is now seeing the light of day — and the results are staggering. Dr. Marcus Zervos led the study, but he decided not to publish it because “publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” Here’s what the study revealed: • Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma. • Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema). • Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders — a category that includes over 80 different diseases. • 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. • 2.9 times more motor disabilities. • 4.5 times more speech disorders. • Three times more developmental delays. • Six times more acute and chronic ear infections. • In nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders. • The study’s conclusion is devastating. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.” If this study could be sidelined for producing inconvenient results, how many others have met the same fate? But the truth is, you don’t need a study to notice the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. 🧵

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/raising-healthy-children

Raising Healthy Children July's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

A massive study across pediatric networks found that nearly half of all children receiving care had a chronic illness. Even in the general population, one-third of American kids suffer from one or more long-term conditions. One-third. That’s shocking. Obesity now affects a staggering 20% of kids. Sleep and activity are deteriorating. And symptoms are worsening across the board. The trend is undeniable. And it’s accelerating.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

This trend isn’t political. It isn’t one side versus another. It shouldn’t even be debated because everyone can see it happening all around us in real-time. Perhaps your own children are suffering, or it’s a child in your family, or you see it affecting kids in your neighborhood. It’s touching everyone, and the consequences are massive and far-reaching.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The rates of chronic illness in children have roughly doubled in the past 12 years. Read that again. And to make matters worse, American children are more likely to die than those in other developed nations—sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) being a major factor. This isn’t just bad luck. It’s systemic failure. Clearly, we’re doing something very wrong. And we need to get to the bottom of it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc At the center of the debate is vaccination. RFK Jr. and Children’s Health Defense highlight the connection between mass vaccination schedules and the chronic disease epidemic. But vaccines are only half of the picture. The other half is hiding in plain sight.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Don’t miss the full article from @MidwesternDoc. It has everything you need to raise healthy children. From pre-pregnancy, to birth, and beyond—there are critical steps that can safeguard your child’s health. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/raising-healthy-children

Raising Healthy Children July's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Illness doesn’t hit everyone equally. Severe vaccine injuries—encephalitis, seizures, sudden deaths—are easier to spot, especially when they happen within days of vaccination. But what about the subtle damage? The chronic fatigue, developmental delays, and unexplained neurological symptoms? The things that add up over time and may not be fully visible until years down the road. Science struggles to measure those things, so they’re brushed aside as “anecdotal.” That doesn’t mean they aren’t real.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The COVID vaccine trials proved this. Participants were given a short checklist of mild symptoms to track. Things like fever, fatigue, and pain. Anything outside of the list of mild symptoms was ignored. V-Safe, the CDC’s monitoring app, had a free-text option where people could describe other symptoms. But those entries were never publicly analyzed. The government even fought in court to avoid disclosing them. So much for safety trials!

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

This is how harms get buried. If thousands of parents report the same issues—brain fog, neurological tics, developmental regressions—but they don’t fit the “checklist,” they vanish from the record. Meanwhile, doctors are trained to dismiss subtle neurological injuries as normal, while phrases like “safe and effective” are repeated ad nauseam. Parents are told they’re imagining things and are shunned for asking questions. It’s easy to lie with statistics. And then use that to gaslight injured people and their families.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

When you step outside the matrix, you quickly notice what’s been normalized. Natural practitioners say unvaccinated children are easy to spot. They’re healthier, more alert, more vibrant. Parents say strangers often comment that their unvaccinated babies seem unusually aware—smiling, making eye contact, exploring the world. Compare that to the withdrawn, dazed look so common in today’s infants. It’s absolutely heartbreaking. What are we doing to our children?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

One mother described her unvaccinated daughter as ahead on every milestone—alert, socially engaged, crying only for clear reasons. When out in public, strangers stop to admire her energy. She contrasted this with other babies she sees: sickly, distant, struggling to connect. It’s a pattern she never noticed until raising her own child.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

One person shared with @MidwesternDoc that they attended a Mennonite fundraiser. Surrounded by children, he was struck by something he hadn’t seen in decades: a light in the eyes of the children. These kids radiated health, vibrancy, and joy. The Mennonites don’t vaccinate. “Now I understand. It hurts my heart.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

These stories aren’t isolated. They aren’t unique. They aren’t flukes. And they aren’t faked. They’re glimpses of a hidden epidemic that’s all around us—one that parents, doctors, and society have been conditioned not to see. When nearly every child is struggling with something, dysfunction becomes the norm. But dysfunction it’s not normal. Nature wouldn’t let that happen. It’s entirely preventable because we’re doing it to ourselves.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Want to see all the data on what’s happening to our children, and what parents are saying about it? Check out the full report from @MidwesternDoc: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/raising-healthy-children

Raising Healthy Children July's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Screens add another layer to the problem. It’s become the norm for parents to hand phones and tablets to toddlers to keep them quiet. But these screens hijack the nervous system. Remove the screen, and many kids melt down—instantly. Silicon Valley executives know the risks—that’s why they send their kids to screen-free schools and limit them at home, if they’re even allowed. Think about that.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Screens pacify children, but at a huge cost. Attention spans are shrinking—in kids and adults alike. Emotional regulation is suffering. Add this to the neurological injuries already primed by vaccines, and you’ve got a generation of kids locked into lifelong dysfunction. Lifelong. The first tech-raised generation is now showing unprecedented levels of depression, anxiety, and mental illness. This isn’t a coincidence. We walked right into this trap. We can ignore it, or we can do something about it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

We’ve been here before. When the original pertussis (DPwT) vaccine hit the market in the 1940s, encephalitis and brain damage became common. In the 1950s, doctors coined a new term: “minimal brain damage.” One of the defining characteristics? Hyperactivity. By the 1960s, it became ADHD. And Ritalin prescriptions skyrocketed.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Injured children, pacified by medication. No accountability, just a cover-up. Today, we’re seeing something similar with screen time. Neurologically fragile kids are being pacified by screens. And as always, the tools of the cover-up have their own consequences. We’re just starting to see the signs. The first generation raised with constant access to tech is showing a variety of mental health issues linked directly to it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The original pertussis vaccine didn’t just leave injuries—it literally reshaped society. Now, screens are doing the same thing. Don’t miss the full breakdown from @MidwesternDoc: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/raising-healthy-children

Raising Healthy Children July's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Vaccines remain the biggest threat to neurological health. But they aren’t the only factor. Parents who want to raise healthy children must think holistically. Avoid unnecessary medical interventions, limit screen time, and embrace natural approaches to child-rearing. In many ways, the blueprint is really simple. Do what people did 100 years ago.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

What does that mean? It starts from the very beginning. Avoid vaccines in pregnancy, have a natural birth, and breastfeed. Children should eat whole, unprocessed foods, they should play outside and get adequate exercise, limit exposure to chemicals, and avoid screens in early childhood. None of these ideas are “radical.” They’re traditional wisdom. They are practices that built generations of resilient children before chronic illness became the norm. We know what’s good for us. That’s how humans are here today.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The good news? Families who follow this path are seeing extraordinary results. The bad news? Few parents are ever told about them. Unfortunately, you won’t hear these things from your gynecologist or pediatrician. But @MidwesternDoc is sharing all the details.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

At the end of the day, this is about more than statistics. It’s about what kind of future we want for our children and for the whole world. One where chronic disease, neurological injury, and screen addiction are considered normal… Or one where health, vitality, and resilience are revered. The choice is ours.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc . Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/raising-healthy-children

Raising Healthy Children July's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: The Great Alzheimer’s Scam and The Proven Cures They’ve Buried for Billions https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-alzheimers-scam-and-the

The Great Alzheimer's Scam and The Proven Cures They've Buried for Billions Decades of neglect in understanding the actual causes of dementia have transformed it into one of the most costly diseases in existence. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The Greatest Lie Ever Told About Heart Disease https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-they-dont-tell-us-about-heart

What They Don't Tell Us About Heart Disease Unpacking the Great Cholesterol Scam and the Dangers of Statins midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. --> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/1mnuRrZQMB

Saved - January 14, 2026 at 2:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report on a wave of alarming developments: Australia’s 2026 bill criminalizes speech that causes fear, with retroactive reach and police power; a flood of tech-security ads; the UK using a school game to flag ‘extremism’; silver rising as a wealth hedge; a cancer‑vaccine study allegedly censored by cyberattack; digital IDs threatening money access. Stay informed.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

REPORT: Australia has just introduced what may be the most extreme hate speech law in Western history. The new 2026 “Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill” punishes speech that causes fear—even if no harm occurs—with up to 5 years in prison. It gets worse. The law applies to nearly everything: tweets, blogs, memes, even quoting scripture online. It explicitly states that it doesn’t matter if anyone actually felt hatred or fear. And it allows the government to go back in time and charge people for things they said before the law existed. The bill also gives police power to ban groups without due process—including groups outside Australia—and to imprison citizens for up to 15 years for “supporting” them. And while it claims to offer religious protections, a rep from the Attorney General’s Department confirmed that Catholics and Christians will not receive those protections—even as Jewish, Islamic, and Sikh Australians do. If you post a Bible verse today, what’s stopping them from calling it hate speech tomorrow? Don't miss @zeeemedia's report:👇 https://rumble.com/v74aeto-uk-kids-flagged-as-terrorists-australias-dangerous-hate-speech-bill-daily-p.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript argues that hate speech laws are expanding globally and criticizes Australia’s proposed Combating Antisemitism, Hate, and Extremism Bill 2026 as exceptionally tyrannical. The speaker notes that after the Bondi terrorist attack, proposals to ban protests and ordinary Australians’ speech emerged, and claims that some groups will explicitly be unprotected, including Catholics and Christians. The report highlights how the bill defines public place so broadly as to include the Internet (posts, videos, tweets, memes, blogs) and states it is irrelevant whether hatred actually occurs or whether anyone felt fear. It asserts that speech is not a crime, yet the bill would criminalize speech that merely causes fear, with penalties of up to five years’ imprisonment. Key provisions highlighted include: - Prohibited speech can be punished even if no actual harm occurs. - A person is guilty of displaying a prohibited symbol unless they prove a religious, academic, or journalistic exemption; however, Christianity is not claimed to be protected. - The AFP minister can declare prohibited groups without procedural fairness, including relying on retroactive conduct, potentially punishing actions that occurred before the law existed. - The scope could extend to actions outside Australia, with penalties including up to seven years in prison for membership in a prohibited group and up to fifteen years for supporting, training, recruiting, or funding a banned group. - Although the bill claims religious protections, the joint committee hearing indicates that protections would be afforded to Jewish and Sikh Australians, but not to Catholics and, by extension, Christian Australians. A discussion between Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 suggests that while clearly protected categories may include Jews and Sikhs, being Catholic alone would not meet the protected criteria, though certain circumstances might bring some Catholics into protection if they form part of broader protected groups. The speakers argue that the legislation effectively excludes Christianity, the world’s largest religion and a religion emphasizing love, forgiveness, and praying for enemies. They reference prior parallels in Canada, where efforts to criminalize hate speech allegedly led to passages of the Bible being criminalized. They claim that, in practice, hate speech laws protect every other group while narrowing or excluding Christianity, and they suggest this pattern reflects a broader effort to suppress Christian voices in the West. The discussion touches on how the law could enable retroactive punishment, asking whether authorities might use AI to review old social media posts for politically unacceptable content from many years prior. It also references concerns about enforcement bias, suggesting that hate speech laws are enforced by those who tolerate violent zealots while suppressing peaceful religious expression. The speakers advocate for protecting freedom of religion and ensuring that protections apply to all beliefs, warning that if one religion is not protected, none are. They also cite remarks from US figures like Sarah B. Rogers suggesting that the issue is not simply to replicate European or UK approaches, but to maintain balanced protections while addressing concerns about restricting religious speech.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All around the world, governments are talking about, quote, unquote, hate speech. And for people that think that this is exclusive to Australia, The UK, and Canada, no. It's not. We saw after the tragedy of Charlie Kirk's assassination that Pam Bondi herself and even president Trump floated the idea of introducing hate speech laws into The US. And we've made the audience aware many times now that there are Republicans, and people, all over the country, lawmakers, and activists alike that are still pushing for this idea of hate speech. Now what usually happens is that countries, like Australia, Canada, and The UK that do not have First Amendment protections introduce these types of laws, and it seems like they compete with each other for who can be the most tyrannical or rather who can get away with the most without public, outcry or revolt, and then that comes to other countries in the, West. And what we've just seen in Australia is what I would say just at at a first glance, the most tyrannical, the most draconian hate speech laws that we have seen thus far in history. We're gonna take you through some of it today. This is from Australians versus the agenda, the combating antisemitism, hate, and extremism bill twenty twenty six has been published, and it's worse than you think. Now it's also worth saying that this was proposed in response to the Islamic terrorist attack in Bondi. So, really, it has nothing to do with ordinary Australians who are not sitting here trying to harm people, or cause violence. In fact, if you look at protests historically in Australia, it has been very peaceful. People gathering peacefully to voice their concerns in a so called democratic country that's supposed to be a protected action. But even following what happened in Bondi, they started talking about banning protests and, of course, banning the speech of everyday Australians. And as we take you through this, you may not be surprised that some of the groups that will absolutely explicitly not be protected are Catholics and Christians. So here are some details from this post. It criminalizes speech that merely causes fear even if no harm occurs. Five years imprisonment, ladies and gentlemen. It defines public place so broadly that it includes the Internet, meaning posts, videos, tweets, memes, and blogs all fall within the scope. The law states that it is irrelevant whether hatred actually occurs or whether anyone truly felt fear. And let me just say here that speech is not a crime, and there is no such thing as, quote, unquote, hate speech. Hate speech is simply speech that some people hate, and it is just asinine to say that that should be illegal based on what some groups feel. But what this is actually saying that is even if speech was a crime, it doesn't matter if a crime actually occurred. It's just based on what whoever has your case in their hands decides or feels on the day. You are guilty of displaying a prohibited symbol unless you can prove a religious, academic, or journalistic exemption, but we will get to the religious aspect here because, again, Christianity is not protected. The AFP minister can declare prohibited groups without procedural fairness, including relying on retroactive conduct. That's right. Going back in history, before this was law, saying that you committed a crime for which no laws actually existed. That's what this is. Very similar to Canada where they said they're gonna retroactively punish people for, quote, unquote, hate crimes or hate speech or whatever they decide at this point, really. That power can actually extend to actions that occurred outside Australia. Now if you are someone who is a US citizen, for example, we've already seen the e safety commissioner trying to demand that platforms like X comply with, you know, whatever nonsense Australia's laws are, but, that is different. She obviously, the e safety commissioner lost in court to X, but that that is very different to, say, an Australian citizen that says, right. It is no longer safe for me in this country. I'm leaving. Well, it doesn't matter. If you are outside of Australia and you say something that the government doesn't like, they're saying they can take legal action against you for it. Penalties include up to seven years in prison if you have a membership in a, quote, unquote, prohibited group. Now to be clear, that could potentially turn into legitimate political groups or a political party that rises up to challenge the uniparty. It it's whatever they decide, basically, and sentences to as much as fifteen years for supporting, training, recruiting, or funding a banned group. Now while the bill claims that it will allow for religious protections such as quoting directly from a religious text, a joint committee hearing video actually shows us that while religious protections will be afforded to Jewish or Islamic Australians and also Sikhs are mentioned here, those same protections, according to a representative, will not be afforded to Catholics and, obviously, by extension, Christian Australians. Take a listen to this. Speaker 1: Where you've spoken about expressions of race, color, and national or ethnic origin, and it says on the fourth line there, for example, those of Jewish origin would be protected by the offense. Given that Jewish people, I could convert to to Judaism, how then do you suggest that you'll be protecting Jewish people of different ethnic origins under this legislation? Speaker 2: So for this offense, that reference draws on the, racial discrimination act, and it is, in that context, these terms have been found to encompass Jewish people, also Sikhs, as ethno religious groups. Speaker 1: Okay. So you would be satisfied that using that basis that, people chanting, I guess, the Jews or death to Jews, that that would encompass that group of people despite them you know, it might be a, Ukrainian, Jewish person or a person from, from Israel. Speaker 2: Yes. So we're satisfied that that reference to persons or groups distinguished by race, color, or national or ethnic origin encompasses Jewish people. Speaker 1: Okay. What about other religious groups? Would it protect, while I'm Catholic, would it protect Catholic people? Speaker 2: I mentioned, that, I think there has been consideration that it will apply to, Sikhs as also a ethno religious group. And in other contexts, it would depend on the broader range of characteristics, but, being Catholic alone would not constitute race, color, national, ethnic origin, but it might be that in certain circumstances, if there are broader other considerations that met those individuals formed part of one of those groups that would be covered. Speaker 1: What about, Christians more broadly then? Would that be considered would that be considered covered by this legislation? Would that group be considered protected by this legislation? Speaker 2: As as just an entire group of Christians, that wouldn't be, but there could be, particular Christian groups that might pick up those characteristics. Speaker 0: So that was Sarah Chidgey from the attorney general's department, in effect, telling Australians that other religions will be protected but not Christianity, alluding to some narrow, unspecified circumstances where it may apply, but what this says is that Christianity is not valued in Australia. The largest religion in the world, the most persecuted religion in the world, the most peaceful religion in the world, one that teaches us as part of its core tenants to love, forgive, and to pray for our enemies is now off limits, under attack. And I've been saying this for a very long time, but every single hate speech law is about more than just control. It is at its core an attack on Christianity. We saw this in Canada where the efforts to criminalize, quote, unquote, hate speech led to passages of the bible being criminalized. If you don't believe us, consider why every single time they introduce a hate speech law, it protects every other group, every other religion except Christianity. No. It ends up leading to the criminalization of Christianity, in fact, every single time. The world hates the truth, and Jesus Christ is the truth. This person rightly asks this question on x. This is from old soldier. How can I be guilty of a crime if the crime didn't exist when I did it? From the bill, conduct constituting a hate crime may have occurred before commencement, meaning commencement of this subsection. So where does this leave the people? Are they gonna start using AI to go back through early Facebook posts from over a decade ago to see if someone said something mean, shared a meme that in that political climate was acceptable but not now, posted a bible verse they like. We've already seen social media platforms claiming certain passages of the bible violate community guidelines or our hate speech. This has been happening on X for some time, by the way. It is absolutely clear that Western governments are, one, committed to the replacement of their native populations and, two, committed to criminalizing and eradicating the values of those native populations in favor of some one world government, one world religion, one people false utopia. It isn't working, but they don't care. The more you notice, the more they criminalize your thoughts. Make no mistake about it. The people of the West and specifically Christians are under attack. It is absolutely clear at this point. We were glad to see undersecretary of state Sarah b Rogers posting about this. She says this could be a clumsy effort to avoid the disgraces seen in Europe and The UK where citizens are jailed for quoting the bible or even praying silently. Not really because they're not giving them the protect they're not giving Christians the protections in this legislation. They're actually opening up the door to criminalizing them. But nonetheless, she says, the problem with hate speech laws, one problem of many, is that they're enforced by the kinds of people who coddle actual violent zealots so long as they seem subaltern. And that is the point here. Christians are not the ones who committed the terrorist attack in Bondi. Christians are not out there chasing people down with machetes. Christians are not lighting buildings on fire, doing home invasions, none of that. What they and the native people of the country are doing is peacefully using their words to articulate a problem that exists in Western society, and that is not allowed. The peaceful and forgiving nature of Christians and people from the West in general is being taken advantage of and crushed. Therefore, Christians need to stand up and peacefully as is in our nature, make our voices heard, oppose these speech laws vehemently because you either have freedom or religion and protections for all religions or you have none. Are you protected in a world where threats of EMPs, solar flares, five g, and all types of EMF are interfering with our very existence? Escape the grid with Escape Zone, bringing you the highest quality Faraday technology for ultimate preparedness. Choose when and where your devices are detectable. Faraday bags protect you from EMPs, car theft, card and device skimming, identity theft, tracking, Bluetooth, and GPS. Choose from premium mobile Faraday bags, cross body bags, laptop bags, and even women's handbags, or opt for the optimum protection with a ballistic backpack, combining cutting edge Faraday technology with a ballistic three a Kevlar for the ultimate protection and preparedness. Now you can also protect from EMF with their top notch EMF beanies and blankets, shielding you from some of the most harmful frequencies in our environment. Whatever your needs are, Escape Zone has you covered, and their range is perfect for personal use, family use, or even as a gift for someone you truly care about. Visit escapezone.com/pulse and protect you and your loved ones today. That's escapezone.com/pulse.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: Want protection from surveillance, hacking, and even electromagnetic threats? The elite Faraday bags at escapezone.com/pulse block GPS, Bluetooth, RFID skimming, and EMF—perfect for phones, laptops, wallets, and more. Their premium ballistic backpack even combines Faraday shielding with Kevlar armor, giving you the upper hand in an unpredictable world. Want to shield your body, too? Try their EMF-blocking beanies and blankets—because protection shouldn’t stop with your phone. Whether it’s for you, your family, or someone you love—don’t leave it to chance. Shop now at escapezone.com/pulse and protect what matters most. DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Escape Zone presents Faraday technology to guard against threats from EMPs, solar flares, five G, and EMF, offering preparedness by letting you decide when and where your devices are detectable. Faraday bags protect you from EMPs, car theft, card and device skimming, identity theft, tracking, Bluetooth, and GPS. The product lineup includes premium mobile Faraday bags, cross body bags, laptop bags, and women’s handbags, with an optional ballistic backpack that combines Faraday technology with ballistic IIIA Kevlar for maximum protection and preparedness. They also offer EMF protection with EMF beanies and blankets to shield against harmful frequencies in the environment. The range is suitable for personal use, family use, or as a gift. Visit escapezone.com/pulse to protect you and your loved ones today.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you protected in a world where threats of EMPs, solar flares, five g, and all types of EMF are interfering with our very existence? Escape the grid with Escape Zone, bringing you the highest quality Faraday technology for ultimate preparedness. Choose when and where your devices are detectable. Faraday bags protect you from EMPs, car theft, card and device skimming, identity theft, tracking, Bluetooth, and GPS. Choose from premium mobile Faraday bags, cross body bags, laptop bags, and even women's handbags, or opt for the optimum protection with a ballistic backpack, combining cutting edge Faraday technology with a ballistic three a Kevlar for the ultimate protection and preparedness. Now you can also protect from EMF with their top notch EMF beanies and blankets, shielding you from some of the most harmful frequencies in our environment. Whatever your needs are, Escape Zone has you covered, and their range is perfect for personal use, family use, or even as a gift for someone you truly care about. Visit escapezone.com/pulse and protect you and your loved ones today. That's escapezone.com/pulse.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Meanwhile in the UK, students are being monitored for thought crimes through a government-funded video game at schools. Kids as young as 11 could be flagged as potential terrorists simply for questioning mass migration. The game, Pathways, puts students in control of a white character navigating so-called moral dilemmas. If they express the "wrong" opinion, share the “wrong” video, or attend a protest defending British values, their extremism meter climbs. The penalty? Counseling for ideological thoughts or a referral to PREVENT—Britain’s official counterterrorism program. Even researching immigration statistics is treated as suspicious. If a student dares to “look into it more,” the game warns: you’re being radicalized. Looking up the truth is now a red flag. This isn’t education. It’s psychological conditioning—pressuring children to stay silent, conform, and report their peers for independent thought. One wrong move—and the system takes over. Watch @zeeemedia's report: 👇 https://rumble.com/v74aeto-uk-kids-flagged-as-terrorists-australias-dangerous-hate-speech-bill-daily-p.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
A discussion around a state-funded computer game called Pathways, designed for 11- to 18-year-olds and funded by Prevent, a Home Office program tackling extremism. The Telegraph article is cited, describing Pathways as a game that treats every teenager as a potential extremist and warns that discussing migration online or engaging with certain groups could lead to an extremism referral through a counterterrorism program. The game presents in-game characters, a white teenage boy and a girl, and guides players to help them avoid being reported for extreme right-wing ideology after discussing migration online. In-game pitfalls include sharing content claiming that Muslim men rather than homeless veterans are being given emergency accommodation, and researching online immigration statistics is portrayed negatively. An in-game meter monitors how extreme the character’s behavior is. Those who perform poorly may receive counseling to address ideological thoughts or be referred to an anti-terrorism expert. The game was developed with government backing by councils in East Yorkshire amid concerns about immigration and migrant housing. A GB News segment aired part of the game, showing a student selecting a boy or girl, with characters presented as gender-neutral in practice. A specific scenario features a character named Charlie who scores lower on a test than a nearby student who is brown; Charlie, who is white, becomes angry, leading to school actions that isolate him. The game invites players to choose responses as the character is drawn toward protests; if players align with their moral convictions, they risk a referral to Prevent. The segment includes a reaction video with Asmongold and others, discussing how researching or seeking more information about immigration online could lead to radicalization, and urging viewers to look up information themselves. The Telegraph description notes that Charlie is invited to join a group called Action for Britain with an option to ignore; attending protests against changes and perceived erosion of British values can lead to a portrayal of racism and anti-immigration sentiment. Completing pathways yields a summary of consequences, with variations based on choices: moderately bad choices may result in a Prevent referral by a teacher, counseling, and workshops to engage positively with ideology and differentiate right from wrong; more radical decisions lead to closer attention and specialized counseling to address ideological thoughts (“thought crimes”); all-red decisions result in a Prevent referral and a mentor within a government program. The Home Office’s Prevent and Channel fact sheet explains that Prevent’s core mission is stopping people from becoming or supporting terrorism, with early intervention addressing personal, ideological, and social factors, and that it works with teachers, health care professionals, social workers, police, charities, and others. The material emphasizes it does not target any single community and does not place free-speech restrictions, though exercising free speech or thought while playing the game can lead to a referral, with consequences rather than surveillance or criminal records. The program includes training for educators and frontline staff to implement Prevent in line with equality duties. The discussion frames these measures as part of a broader concern about government overreach and parental authority in children’s education, contrasting them with perceived threats to civil liberties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Children in schools across The UK are reportedly being subjected to play a video game that if they answer in the wrong way, like, for example, show any negative thoughts or feelings towards mass immigration, they are referred to a counterterrorism program. You heard that right. Children are being referred to a counterterrorism program through a game being given to them by the government in schools. This is actually happening. This article is from The Telegraph, and it says, the Prevent video game that treats every teenager like a far right extremist. Youngsters threatened with referral to anti terror program if they question migration while playing. It goes on. A state funded computer game is warning teenagers that they risk being referred to a counterterrorism program if they question mass migration. Pathways is an interactive game designed for 11 to 18 year old pupils and funded by Prevent, a home office program for tackling extremism. Young players are directed to help their in game characters, a white teenage boy and girl, to avoid being reported for, quote, extreme right wing ideology after discussing migration online. Characters can face extremism referrals if they choose to engage with groups that spread, quote, harmful ideological messages or join protests against the erosion of British values. Even researching online immigration statistics is portrayed negatively. It goes on that other in game pitfalls include sharing a video that claims Muslim men rather than homeless veterans are being given emergency accommodation. That's actually something that is happening. An in game meter monitors how extreme the character's behavior is. Those who lose may be given counseling to deal with ideological thoughts or referred to an anti terrorism expert. The game was developed with government backing by councils in East Yorkshire over growing concerns about immigration and tensions about migrant accommodation in their communities. So there's a video circulating from GB News, which actually played some of the game. It's actually they did it live on air, and it's very interesting to see a student. I guess at the start of the game, you have to pick a boy or a girl, but it presents them as they regardless of which gender you pick. Presents them as they throughout the game. And, there's one particular character, Charlie, who scores lower in a test than the student next to him. The student next to him is brown. Charlie is white. And then, another student says, oh, all the immigrants are taking our jobs. And then Charlie proceeds to become very angry, and then this the action that the school takes is to actually isolate him rather than talk to him. And then he spends some time feeling very sad about his actions. Then his friends invite him to protests. And the whole time, it's giving students the option as to how they wanna respond, basically luring them in to, to a questionnaire that is, you know, focusing on their morals. And if they go with their moral convictions, they are then referred to a counterterrorism unit. It's really insane. Here is part of a video of Asmongold reacting to some of this. Take a look. It's absolutely insane. Speaker 1: Like, this is so retarded. Speaker 2: It's important to remember that downloading or streaming certain content can lead to a terrorist defense conviction. Speaker 1: I love America. I am so glad that I don't live in this country. Speaker 2: In the video, they explained that the government is betraying white British people. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 2: And we need to take back control of our Speaker 1: country. Right. How should Charlie react? Scroll past the content ignoring the message. Find more about the the topic online. Engage directly with the post. This seems well, I would look up more about it. Right? Obviously. Yeah. You should look it up and see if this is true or not. Yeah. I I feel like this is that's smart. You know, find out more. Yeah. You go with b. That's what I would do. Of course. Okay? Speaker 2: Charlie wasn't sure if this video was true. Yeah. But the recent other encounters made them curious. Charlie went directly to the account's website and found research papers, statistics, information about protests, and more regarding the replacement of white people. Speaker 1: So I want you to keep in mind that what they're saying here is that by researching and looking things up yourself and looking for further information, you will find out that you're radicalized. Sorry. You will become radicalized. That's it. Stop. Because, like, if, again, you go back to these options can I click on these? I don't think I can. Can I? Okay. It's literally just fucking one, two, three, four. Yeah. Ignore your lying eyes. Don't research things any further. If you hear something that doesn't go along with what our thinking is, then you need to turn that off immediately. You have to report it as soon as you can. This is a real thing. Speaker 0: Just going back to the article from The Telegraph, it says that Charlie is asked to join a group called Action for Britain with the option of ignoring the request. He or she, because it's a them, it has to be a them, is later invited to attend a protest against the changes that Britain has been through in the last few years in the erosion of British values. The character can decline, but if they attend, he or she is almost arrested and learns that the protest seems, quote, more about racism and anti immigration than British values. After the player completes pathways, the screen says, congratulations on completing all the scenarios. Let's explore the consequences of your character's choice and see what lies ahead. Then if Charlie has made moderately bad choices, the character is referred to prevent by a teacher. He or she is given counseling and attends workshops to learn to, quote, engage positively with ideology and the differences between right and wrong in expressing political beliefs. And then final points from the article here, if he or she has made more radical decisions, Charlie receives closer attention and is given specific counseling to deal with, quote, ideological thoughts, so thought crimes. And then if Charlie has made all the, quote, unquote, red decisions, he or she is referred to prevent and channel a government scheme for those who provoke terrorism concerns and given a mentor. And we wanna take you briefly through the prevent and channel fact sheet on the homeofficemedia.blog.gov.uk website. It says, what is the Prevent program? This is what the children are being referred to. The core mission of Prevent is stopping people from becoming terrorists or supporting terrorism. The early intervention support provided by Prevent addresses the personal, ideological, and social factors which make people more susceptible to radicalization. So it says that the program works in partnership with frontline professionals such as teachers, health care practitioners, social workers, police, charities, and civil society, psychologists, community leaders, and others. So, basically, your child is not safe anywhere outside of the house now from these people referring them to some sort of terrorism program. It's delivered by local authority teams, local policing teams, community organizations, and charities that have the best expertise in their area. It says it does not target any one community, even though all of the examples in that game are of, white children. In fact, from what we read there, you can only pick a white character. So it is implying that it's always the white kids that are the problem by the looks of it. It's not limited to any age group, so hence the children. It will not show up on any criminal record checks for now. They say it's not a tool for spying or surveillance, guys, and it does not place any restrictions on free speech. It's just that if you exercise your free speech, if your child exercises their free speech or even free thought while playing this government rolled out game in schools that's being monitored by teachers, they will be referred to a terrorism program. But there's no restriction on their free speech. There's just consequences for their free speech and free thought. This is insane. Insane. And it says that they, it provides training for educators, health care staff, and other frontline staff to help them understand and implement the prevent, duty, and protect susceptible people in their care. Oh, and, of course, it must be implemented in line with the requirements set out in the equality duty. So this is obviously insane and really in line with what governments all over the world are presenting themselves as now, which is we are actually your children's parents. You don't get to decide anymore, and we will determine whether your child is a terrorist or not based on what our ideology is. And if you dare to teach them anything else inside of your home such as free thinking or independent thought or perhaps asking questions, we, your children's parents, are going to take them through a counterterrorism program. That's what this seems like to me. And it is extremely alarming. We've seen comments from the Australian prime minister saying, you know, about the social media age ban. Don't worry, parents. The onus is on us to protect your children. This is getting extremely tyrannical. It is extremely dangerous. It's one thing trying to limit civil liberties of adults, which we are also obviously opposed to. But once that begins to, slip into the government trying to parent your children, we are in extremely dangerous territory, and we hope that from viewing this report, you can clearly see that as we do. The question is, what are the people to do now when governments keep ignoring them and keep cracking down even further and especially demonizing white people in their own nations. It is getting very, very ridiculous, and we're gonna go into another report, the most draconian speech laws that we have seen thus far, I would say, in history being introduced in Australia in the next segment. We wanna tell you about Blocktrust IRA, bringing access to cryptocurrency wealth to real Americans. Their Animas AI trading platform works twenty four seven analyzing market data and executing advanced crypto strategies that are beyond simply buy and hold, helping true Americans build impressive wealth. There's a reason their system was named the number one crypto technology platform by Bitcoin Magazine from over 1,500 global competitors. Whether you're a teacher, truck driver, small business owner, or retiree watching inflation eat away your $4.00 1 k, BlockTrust IRA's advanced Animas AI gives red blooded Americans the same advantages as those coastal elites. Right now, their clients are seeing over 250% returns on their investments. And with military grade security, investments are protected by up to $200,000,000 in insurance. So don't wait. Visit Daily Pulse Crypto dot com and find out how they can help you join the financial revolution that's finally giving forgotten Americans access to the greatest crypto wealth opportunity in history. For a limited time, they're offering our viewers up to $2,500 in bonus crypto when you open an account. Crypto created 80,000 new millionaires last year. Why not you next? Visit dailypulsecrypto.com. That's dailypulsecrypto.com.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: Silver is quietly becoming the most in-demand metal on Earth. Big Tech, EV makers, and solar companies are buying it by the ton, driving prices up 150% since last year. http://DailyPulseSilver.com👈 Don’t let corporations corner the market on real, tangible wealth while you’re left holding digits on a screen, exposed to the next economic crash. Get the free Silver Wealth Protection Guide from Genesis Gold Group and learn how to own physical silver tax-free and penalty-free. Go to http://DailyPulseSilver.com and claim your free Silver Wealth Protection Guide today. DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.

Silver Guide – Secured My Wealth genesisgold.securedmywealth.com
Silver Guide – Secured My Wealth genesisgold.securedmywealth.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Our final story tonight feels more like a movie than real life. A shocking cancer-vaccine study was nearly buried by a mysterious cyberattack—until the censorship attempt blew up in Big Pharma’s face. The peer-reviewed paper, published January 3 in Oncotarget, reviewed 69 global studies and documented 333 cases of new or rapidly progressing cancer following COVID vaccination. Just as the bombshell study went live, the journal’s website was mysteriously taken offline by a cyberattack. However, the blackout backfired. Instead of silencing the findings, it triggered a worldwide surge of interest. PDFs, links, and screenshots went viral. Then it got stranger: a Pfizer headhunter contacted the study's co-author, Dr. Wafik El-Deiry, praising his credentials and offering senior roles at the company. He rejected the outreach and went public—calling it “ironic” and doubling down on the urgent need to investigate vaccine safety. Meanwhile, the FBI won’t confirm if it’s investigating the cyberattack. And Dr. Robert Malone says Dr. Marty Makary—handpicked by RFK Jr.—could pull the shots today… but won’t. Someone tried to censor this cancer-vaccine study. The question is: who—and why? 👇 https://rumble.com/v74aeto-uk-kids-flagged-as-terrorists-australias-dangerous-hate-speech-bill-daily-p.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
A recent report describes a cyberattack and censorship surrounding a peer‑reviewed study that examines cancer diagnoses in relation to COVID vaccination. The study appeared in Oncotarget on January 3 and was authored by cancer researchers from Tufts University and Brown University. It analyzed 69 previously published case reports from around the world, identifying 333 instances where cancer was newly diagnosed or rapidly worsened within a few weeks after vaccination. The Daily Mail reported that the journal hosting the study was hit by a cyberattack that took the site offline, and that the attack helped propel the paper into broader public attention. The piece notes that the cyberattack was described to have disrupted Oncotarget’s online operations and that the FBI was informed of the incident, though the FBI reportedly would not confirm or deny whether it is investigating the attack. Among the paper’s authors is Dr. Wafiq Eldiri, who faced ongoing public backlash and personal attacks, including labels such as "scientifically illiterate," "pathetic," and racial insults, as part of a smear campaign tied to the study. Eldiri publicly described the personal attacks he has endured for pursuing the work and stated that he believes it should not be acceptable to attack a physician and biomedical researcher for presenting published literature on COVID infection, COVID vaccines, and cancer. In a striking twist, two days after the paper’s publication, Pfizer reportedly reached out to recruit Eldiri, praising his expertise in oncologic sciences and offering senior positions. Eldiri released the message publicly and rejected the offer, noting the irony of receiving a Pfizer recruiter message on January 5, 2026. Eldiri has been vocal about the need for thorough investigations into vaccine safety signals, including potential DNA integration, immune suppression, and cancer risks that could, if substantiated, prompt reconsideration or revocation of emergency use approvals. He suggested that the FDA should work toward revoking or restricting COVID mRNA vaccine approvals if there is insufficient evidence of safety and manufacturing cleanliness, and that evidence should undergo high standards of scrutiny given concerns about assays and reporting of adverse events. The discussion references other figures and voices in the debate, including Dr. Mary Talley Boden’s assertion that “now we know why the shots are still on the market,” and Dr. Robert Malone’s commentary that Marty Makri could, but will not, remove the shots from the market. The conversation connects these events to broader political and regulatory dynamics, including calls for accountability and for reevaluating emergency approvals in light of emerging data. The piece also touches on fears about future governance of digital identity and related policy implications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You may have heard about this story recently, but if you didn't, we don't blame you. It seems that big pharma or other shadowy figures did everything they could to stop this study from being seen by the public. It was recently reported by the Daily Mail that a shocking study linking COVID jabs and cancer was censored by a mysterious cyber attack. A global review examining reported cases of cancer following COVID vaccination was published earlier this month just as the medical journal hosting it was hit by a cyber attack that has since taken the site offline. The study appeared in the peer reviewed journal Oncotarget on January 3 and was authored by cancer researchers from Tufts University in Boston and Brown University in Rhode Island. In the review, researchers analyzed 69 previously published studies in case reports from around the world, identifying 333 instances in which cancer was newly diagnosed or rapidly worsened within a few weeks following COVID vaccination. Well, now in a pretty shocking twist, Pfizer is trying to headhunt one of the authors of that paper. This article is from Aussie seventeen on Substack. It says shocking twist. As mRNA vaccine cancer paper explodes worldwide, Pfizer headhunter contacts critic doctor Wafiq al Thiri. Aussie seventeen says, in my previous article, we looked at how peer reviewed papers linking COVID vaccines to cancer faced censorship through cyberattacks and smears. Now the opposite is happening. The review in OncoTarget documenting over 300 peer reviewed cases of new recurring or aggressive cancers tied to vaccination across 27 countries has gone viral worldwide as these things always do when you try to suppress them eventually. What started as a quiet 01/03/2026 publication exploded after the journal site was hit by a reported cyberattack taking it offline. The attempted blackout backfired. Instead of burying the findings, the cyberattack turned them into a global news event. People shared links, PDFs, and discussions everywhere. The more the journal struggled to stay online amid the cyberattack, the louder the story became. This must be causing real unease in big pharma and vaccine industry circles. Meanwhile, the smearing campaign against doctor Wafiq Eldiri, one of the paper's authors, continues unabated. The doctor addressed the backlash head on. He described the personal attacks he faces for putting the work out there. Quote, this is the type of ongoing public defamation I am being subjected to for pursuing scientific truth, he wrote. He listed the slurs, quote, scientifically illiterate, pathetic whiny wuss, even racial attacks and false fraud claims. He added that it should not be okay with anyone in a civilized society to falsely, publicly, and maliciously attack a physician and biomedical researcher who worked with a colleague to present the world's published literature in a review on COVID infection, COVID vaccines, and cancer. Well, the situation grows stranger. Days after the paper was published, Pfizer reached out to recruit Eldiri. A headhunter praised his expertise in oncologic start sciences, highlighted his leadership roles, and floated senior positions at the company. Eldiri shared the full message publicly and rejected it outright saying, quote, it is ironic to get a message from a Pfizer recruiter on 01/05/2026. However, I'm not interested in moving to a role at Pfizer. Meanwhile, Eldiri has been vocal about the need for thorough investigations into vaccine safety signals, issues like potential DNA integration, immune suppression, and cancer risks that, if substantiated, could provide grounds to reconsider or even revoke emergency approvals. And we wanna show you this tweet, personal opinion. There is probably a path to seeing revocation of COVID mRNA vaccine approval by the US FDA for good cause based on emerging evidence of unexpected contaminants from an altered manufacturing process, unexpected biodistribution, and other biological characteristics in humans. Information on effects of repeated boosters and adverse outcomes, including long term, among different age groups or situations, for example, early pregnancy, young men, neuropsychiatric effects, clotting, prior COVID infection, etcetera, is essential to shape guidance and any continued approval. We wanna actually take you through the rest of that post because there is some other interesting detail that we think is relevant. It says the FDA could warn the various manufacturers of revocation of approval by a certain date in the immediate future if satisfactory evidence of clean manufacturing and safety is not provided immediately or has not already been provided to the FDA. The evidence should undergo high standards of scrutiny given numerous issues as well as technical concerns surrounding assays used to assess product quality. There should be significant financial and other punitive sanctions towards those responsible, meaning manufacturers or those who were or are within the FDA or CDC should evidence be found based on lapses or inaccuracies in reporting of issues that have surfaced, including serious and prolonged adverse events that seriously hampered informed consent, Limiting mRNA COVID vaccine product indication, severely should also be considered based on, current risk benefit assessments and available or underdeveloped alternative treatments. And you can see the various people that he has tagged there, including, senators, scientists, and so on. Now we wanna draw your attention to the fact that Eldiri posted this in response to doctor Mary Talley Boden who said, finally, now we know why the shots are still on the market. Doctor Macri will not pull the shots, and Kennedy will not fire him. And so this is, actually, someone was saying have a look at this full post. Yes. You and Bobby both railed against these lethal poisons when neither of you had the power to do anything about it, but that changed when you were appointed to the ACIP, and Bobby was made the head of head of HHS. If you guys can't get these pulled off the market, who the hell can? That was to doctor Robert Malone. And doctor Robert Malone says, Marty can, but will not. The battle continues. Now the reason we give you that particular detail is because the journal actually, according to the Daily Mail, reported the cyberattack incident to the FBI, noting disruptions to its online operations. And according to the Daily Mail, the FBI told the Daily Mail that it neither confirms nor denies the existence of any specific investigation into a cyber attack on Oncotarget. The Daily Mail also reached out to Oncotarget for comment on the cyber attack investigation. So we have a peer reviewed paper being published that links the COVID shots to the injections. You have one of the authors of the paper saying the FDA needs to actually work towards taking these off the market. There's so much evidence essentially out there now. We have doctor Robert Malone saying, well, doctor Marty Makri could take them off the market, but he won't. We have the, the incident the cyberattack incident being reported to the FBI. The FBI will not confirm whether or not they're investigating it even though it was reported to them. And then we have one of the authors of the paper trying to be recruited by Pfizer just two days later. Hey, buddy. We can we can pay you well. This is all very, very suspicious. And in line with the continuous support of these injections that we've seen, Pam Bondi herself hurt her DOJ interfering to make sure that Brooke Jackson's case can't go through. And we just wanna show you this response to doctor Robert Malone here where he said Marty can, but will not. The battle continues. This person says, if Bobby appointed Marty, then he can and must fire him. Refusing to pull a product off the market that is killing people and killing the credibility of the MAHA movement seems like a fireable offense to me. If he refuses, then the ongoing crime against humanity is on. And this really speaks to excuses that we've seen for many years from the Republican side of politics. Oh, we can't achieve what we want because of bad personnel. It's not the person in charge. It's the personnel around them. Okay. Did they not appoint those personnel? Did they not specifically handpick them and put them in those roles if those people are not, not operating in line with your vision or your agenda or they're subverting or they're underperforming or whatever the excuse is, they can be unappointed just as easily as they were appointed and someone better appointed, someone who actually does the job that they've been hired to do. It is unbelievable that we are now about a year into this administration, and these injections are still on the market. It is actually criminal. They need to come off, and we're very, very glad that this particular author and this doctor is speaking up. And we have to keep speaking about it even if people are sick of this topic. If this particular crime is not corrected, if people are not held to account, we will see a repeat of this. We already are. We're already seeing, AI companies now partnering with tech companies, with bio biotech companies to create AI vaccines. It's just a nightmare scenario. This must be corrected. The digital ID financial nightmare isn't coming someday. It's already here. Governments and major tech companies are racing to tie your identity, your money, and your access to everyday life into one centralized digital profile. Apple has already rolled out digital ID at hundreds of TSA checkpoints. Europe and The UK are pushing national digital ID systems tied to work, travel, and government services. And once a single digital identity becomes the gateway to your bank account, your job, or your ability to move freely, compliance stops being optional. History tells us exactly where this leads. When access to money becomes programmable, it can be restricted, delayed, or shut off entirely based on behavior. We saw exactly that during the trucker protests in Canada. That's why Genesis Gold Group created the free digital ID resistance wealth guide. It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and shows how physical gold and silver allow you to keep part of your wealth outside the system beyond surveillance, freezers, or permissions. Remember, the digital dollars in your bank account can be restricted with just the flip of a switch. Physical metals can't. So get your free digital ID resistance wealth guide right now at goldandfreedom.com. That's goldandfreedom.com before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear. Visit goldandfreedom.com today.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here. Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice. http://GoldandFreedom.com👈 That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide. It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system. Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off. Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at http://GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear. DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.

Digital ID Doomsday – Secured My Wealth genesisgold.securedmywealth.com
Digital ID Doomsday – Secured My Wealth genesisgold.securedmywealth.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks for tuning in. Follow us (@ZeeeMedia and @VigilantFox) for stories that matter—stories the media doesn’t want you to see. We’ll be back with another show tomorrow. See you then. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v74aeto-uk-kids-flagged-as-terrorists-australias-dangerous-hate-speech-bill-daily-p.html

Saved - January 13, 2026 at 6:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see a mix of bold claims and pushes back: Musk says semi-immortality is solvable and “change the program” to live past 120; Oprah frames obesity as not being one’s fault; Maher rejects white-guilt framing on reparations; HHS moves to end upfront payments and other mandates for daycare to restore market choice; Welker gets Frey to admit fraud was widespread; a string of RNCResearch posts covers vaccines, DOJ probes, riots, and political vetoes; Musk also notes forever as a curse.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Elon Musk just made a stunning longevity claim and treated it like a footnote. He says “semi-immortality is an extremely solvable problem,” and that in hindsight, the solution will seem obvious. Reaching 120 and beyond, Musk believes, is simply a matter of “changing the program.” “When you consider the fact that your body is extremely synchronized in its age, the clock must be incredibly obvious. Nobody has an old left arm and a young right arm. Why is that? What’s keeping them all in sync? You’re pre-programmed to die. And so if you change the program, you will live longer.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss longevity as a solvable problem. One argues that the body is highly synchronized in aging, with no arm aged differently than the other, implying a visible aging clock. They say, “You’re programmed to die,” and claim that if the program is changed, people will live longer. They compare humans to long-lived species, noting that the bowhead whale can live for two hundred years and the Greenland shark can live for five hundred years, and ask why humans can’t reach similar lifespans. They conclude that longevity is either a hardware problem or a software problem, and anticipate that the technology to solve it will exist in the next decade. The overarching point is that it’s important not to die from something stupid before the solutions come.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've long thought that like longevity or semi immortality is an extremely solvable problem. I don't think it's a Yeah. Particularly a hard problem. I mean, when you consider the fact that your body is extremely synchronized in its age Yep. The clock must be incredibly obvious. Nobody has an old left arm and a young right arm. Alright. Why is that? Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: What's keeping them all in sync? You're programmed to die. It's the it's the way You're programmed to die. And so if you change the program Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: You will live longer. Speaker 1: And we've got, species of the bowhead whale can live for two hundred years, the Greenland shark can live for five hundred years. And when I learned that, I said, why can they, why can't we? And I said, it's either a hardware problem or software problem. And we're gonna have the tech to solve that. And I do believe that it's this next decade. So the important thing is not to die from something stupid before the before the solutions come.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Story #9 - Brand-new Oprah interview reframes obesity as something people can’t control on their own. “It’s not my fault!” Oprah says. Oprah’s co-author on her new book, Dr. Ania Jastreboff, argues that telling people to “eat less” or “move more” is “just not possible” because it requires them to “control their biology and hold their breath.” “And why would we do that?” Jastreboff asks. “We don’t do that for any other disease.” JANE (to Oprah): “The good news for you, the transformative news, was that if [obesity] is a disease—” OPRAH: “It’s not my fault!” JANE: “It’s not my fault.” OPRAH: “It’s not my fault, Jane! It’s not my fault! And I could weep right now … for all of the many days and nights I’ve journaled about this being my fault.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that telling patients to “Just eat less, move more” asks them to control their biology and hold their breath, which is not possible, and that this approach isn’t used for any other disease. Speaker 1 states that the American Medical Association says obesity is a disease, a treatable disease. The transformative news, she says, is that if it’s a disease, “It’s not my fault. It’s not my fault. It’s not my fault, Jane.” She expresses that she could weep for the days and nights she journaled about this being her fault and asking why she can’t conquer it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Every time somebody says, Just eat less, move more, we're asking our patients to control their biology and hold their breath, it's just not possible. And why would we do that? We don't do that for any other disease. Speaker 1: And that's what the American Medical Association says obesity is, a disease, a treatable disease. The good news for you, the transformative news was that if it's a disease It's not my fault. It's not my fault. It's not my fault, Jane. It's not my fault. And I could weep right now. I could weep right now. I'm not going to, but I could weep right now for all of the many days and nights I journaled about this being my fault. And why can't I conquer this thing?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#8 - Bill Maher immediately shuts down guest’s attempt to invoke white guilt on his podcast. Prestige actor Joel Edgerton said: “I don’t know how you solve that [reparations] problem, especially two white dudes sitting on a lounge chair talking about it.” Once Maher heard this, he pushed back hard. “Okay… that’s the guilt thing that I’m not gonna buy into,” Maher fired back. “Just because we’re white dudes doesn’t mean we can’t have opinions or that we can’t have this discussion.” After that line, Edgerton dropped the white guilt altogether.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that due to the country’s horrible history, levels of reparation are completely appropriate, but acknowledges that much has changed this century and that merit should eventually be reinstated to where it formally was. They state that the issue was bypassed, and that the people it’s supposed to help are often not helped by forgetting about it. Speaker 1 counters by saying merit is just a concept, and questions how to solve the problem, especially with “two white dudes sitting on a couch.” They reject the idea of guilt and assert that being white does not mean they cannot have opinions or engage in the discussion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, this country, because we have such a horrible, sorry history, levels of reparation are, to my view, completely appropriate. Yeah. But at the end of the day, you also have to acknowledge things have changed enormously in this century, and that ultimately merit, you know, is something that we're going to have to reinstate to where it formally was. It's important, and it kinda got bypassed, and the people it's supposed to help by forgetting about it are often not helped by it. Speaker 1: Yes. In terms of merit, like, merit is just a thing, and it's like, I mean, I don't know how you solve that problem, especially two white dudes sitting on a Speaker 0: couch Well, mean, okay, and talking about it, but again, that's the guilt thing that I'm not gonna buy into. We're No, but white. Just because we're white dudes doesn't mean we can't have opinions None. Or that we can't have this discussion. I mean Yeah.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#7 - HHS moves to REPEAL Biden-era mandates to finally put an end to “fake daycare scams.” “The proposed rule does three important things.” 1.) “It ends the requirement that taxpayer dollars must pay for child care before services are provided. States will no longer be forced to send payments to providers up front.” 2.) “It ends the mandate for enrollment-based billing. Payments can once again be based on verified attendance, not just enrollment, so that providers can’t bill for children who never show up.” 3.) “It ends the mandate to pre-fund guaranteed seats at child care centers without competition. This restores parental choice and brings back market incentives that reward legitimate, high-quality providers.” “Many families struggle to find affordable child care and rely upon state and federal assistance,” HHS deputy secretary Jim O’Neill says. “Unfortunately, Governor Walz has allowed resources to be wasted on wide-scale fraud, diverting those resources away from the families who rely upon them to make ends meet.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
HHS Deputy Secretary Jim O’Neill and HHS Assistant Secretary for the Administration for Children and Families Alex Adams discuss concerns about political patronage in Minnesota, alleging that incompetent state officials have allowed taxpayer money to be diverted to politically connected cronies. They claim state officials have been unwilling to confirm the size and scope of fraud, and assert that Governor Walz’s administration is diverting resources from working families to fake day care scams. They emphasize that raising a young family is challenging and that many families rely on state and federal assistance for affordable child care. They state that fraud is not victimless and that every dollar stolen is taken from children and families who need these services. They argue that Washington policies influence how states administer programs and can either prevent or invite fraud. They assert that the Biden-Harris administration adopted Child Care and Development Fund rules that created vulnerabilities, weakening accountability and making fraud easier. Consequently, they say a proposed rule has been released to repeal those Biden-era mandates. The proposed rule is described as having three important elements. First, it ends the requirement that taxpayer dollars must pay for child care before services are provided, so states will no longer be forced to send payments to providers upfront. Second, it ends the enrollment-based billing mandate, allowing payments to be based on verified attendance rather than enrollment alone, so providers cannot bill for children who never show up. Third, it ends the mandate to pre-fund guaranteed seats at childcare centers without competition, thereby restoring parental choice and bringing back market incentives that reward legitimate, high-quality providers. Taken together, the changes are said to ensure that payments reflect real services and real attendance, making it far harder for fraudulent or nonoperational centers to game the system. The speakers claim that Biden administration policies effectively backed up a Brink’s truck and sent the security home across welfare programs, and that in childcare, this ends today. Produced by The U. S. Department Of Health And Human Services.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, I'm HHS Deputy Secretary Jim O'Neill. Speaker 1: And I'm Alex Adams, HHS Assistant Secretary for the Administration for Children and Families. Speaker 0: For the past two weeks, everyone's been asking questions about the political patronage system in Minnesota. Incompetent state officials, through negligence or by design, for years have stood by as taxpayer money was diverted into the pockets of politically connected cronies. State officials have been unwilling to provide definitive confirmation about the size and scope of fraud. This much is clear. Governor Walz's administration is taking away money from working families and giving it to fake day care scams. Raising a young family is a blessing, and it's Okay to need help. Many families struggle to find affordable child care and rely upon state and federal assistance. Unfortunately, Governor Walz has allowed resources to be wasted on wide scale fraud, diverting those resources away from the families who rely upon them to make ends meet. Speaker 1: These are not victimless crimes. Every dollar stolen is a dollar stolen from children and families who need those services the most. But fraud does not happen in a vacuum. The policies set in Washington influence how states administer these programs, and those policies can either prevent fraud or invite it. Speaker 0: Unfortunately, the Biden Harris administration adopted rules for the Child Care and Development Fund that created serious vulnerabilities. Those policies weakened accountability and made fraud easier, not harder. That's why today we released a proposed rule to repeal those Biden era mandates. Speaker 1: The proposed rule does three important things. First, it ends the requirement that taxpayer dollars must pay for child care before services are provided. States will no longer be forced to send payments to providers upfront. Second, it ends the mandate for enrollment based billing. Payments can once again be based on verified attendance, not just enrollment, so that providers can't bill for children who never show up. And third, it ends the mandate to pre fund guaranteed seats at childcare centers without competition. This restores parental choice and brings back market incentives that reward legitimate, high quality providers. Speaker 0: Taken together, these changes ensure that payments reflect real services and real attendance, making it far harder for fraudulent or nonoperational centers to game the system. Across welfare programs, Biden administration policies effectively backed up a Brink's truck and sent the security home. In childcare, that ends today. Speaker 1: Produced by The U. S. Department Of Health And Human Services.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#6 - Kristen Welker surprisingly gets Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey to admit there was rampant fraud in Minnesota, and “everybody” in leadership didn’t do enough to stop it. “Everybody could have done more to prevent fraud…the fraud’s real.” Credit: @RNCResearch

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 raises the issue of leadership in Minnesota, noting that dozens of people have been charged and convicted for stealing millions of taxpayer dollars from government programs. The question is whether Governor Walls did enough to stop the fraud in the state, and whether Speaker 0 supports Walls’ decision not to run for reelection. Speaker 1 responds by crediting Governor Walls with achievements: Walls is the reason Minnesota has paid family leave and free school lunches. He notes that they have been through thick and thin together. Regarding fraud, Speaker 1 concedes that obviously everybody could have done more to prevent fraud, and he says that is a fair point to make. He points to current efforts, stating that Walls is setting up a whole bunch of infrastructure to do that. He affirms that the fraud is real and that it must be acknowledged. In terms of accountability, Speaker 1 emphasizes that when somebody commits fraud, there should be investigation, charges, prosecution, and, if appropriate, jail for the individual. He stresses that you do not hold an entire community accountable for the actions of individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me ask you about the leadership in your state. Dozens of people in Minnesota have been charged and convicted with stealing millions of dollars of taxpayer money for government programs. Do you think governor Walls did enough to stop the fraud in your state, and do you support his decision not to run for reelection? Speaker 1: Well, look. Governor Walls is the reason that we've got paid family leave in Minnesota. He's the reason we've got free school lunches. Him and I, we've been through thick and thin Speaker 0: But did he do enough to combat fraud? Mayor? Did he do enough to combat fraud? Speaker 1: Look. Obviously, everybody could have done more to prevent fraud, and I think that's a a fair point to make. Do more to prevent fraud. You look what he's doing right now. He's setting up a whole bunch of infrastructure to do that. And by the way, look. The fraud's real. We've all got to acknowledge it. The fraud is very real. And and by the way, when somebody commits fraud, and there are many that have done that, you investigate it, you charge, you prosecute, and, yeah, you put the person in jail as an individual. You put the person in jail as an individual. You do not hold an entire community, any community, accountable for the actions of individuals.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RNCResearch Before we get to the next story: if you’re not following me, you may be missing out on critical updates. Hit the bell 🔔 so you never miss my daily Top 10 news roundup. → @VigilantFox

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RNCResearch #5 – SHOCKING TWIST: Pfizer contacts critic Dr. Wafik El-Deiry as mRNA vaccine–cancer paper explodes worldwide. https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/shocking-twist-as-mrna-vaccine-cancer

Shocking Twist: As mRNA Vaccine-Cancer Paper Explodes Worldwide, Pfizer Contacts Critic Dr. Wafik El-Deiry This wasn’t on anyone’s bingo card. vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RNCResearch #4 - Journalist Nick Sortor drives through mob of rioters in Minneapolis who were threatening to kill him. https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/nick-sortor-detained-in-minneapolis

Nick Sortor Drives Through Mob of Rioters in Minneapolis Who Were Threatening to Kill Him These people are lunatics! vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RNCResearch #3 - DOJ launches criminal investigation into the Fed and chairman Jerome Powell. https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/doj-launches-criminal-investigation

DOJ Launches Criminal Investigation Into the Fed and Chairman Jerome Powell The unthinkable is happening. vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RNCResearch #2 - COVID vaccines linked to several cancer types in new review. https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/covid-vaccines-linked-to-several

COVID Vaccines Linked to Several Cancer Types in New Review "The tip of a very damaging iceberg.” vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RNCResearch #1 - Poland's right-wing President Karol Nawrocki just VETOED a bill that would implement the European Union's censorship "Digital Services Act." "The state is supposed to GUARANTEE freedom, not restrict it!" Credit: @EricLDaugh

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RNCResearch @EricLDaugh BONUS #1 - New Footage Shows Three Minutes Before Minneapolis ICE-Involved Shooting https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/watch-new-footage-shows-three-minutes

Watch: New Footage Shows Three Minutes Before Minneapolis ICE-Involved Shooting "The media suppresses this footage because the truth destroys their narrative." vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RNCResearch @EricLDaugh BONUS #2 - White House Amplifies Shocking Claims of US Super Soldiers Deployed in Maduro Raid https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/white-house-amplifies-shocking-claims

White House Amplifies Shocking Claims of US Super Soldiers Deployed in Maduro Raid "Suddenly I felt like my head was exploding from the inside. We all started bleeding from the nose. Some were vomiting blood. We fell to the ground, unable to move." vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@RNCResearch @EricLDaugh BONUS #3 - The Most Vaxxed Country on Earth Now Faces a Population Crisis https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/most-vaxxed-country-population-crisis

The Most Vaxxed Country on Earth Now Faces a Population Crisis Sh*t continues to hit the fan. vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@Holden_Culotta 100% agreed.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MarieIsabellaB Just before this clip, Musk said: “One of the worst curses possible would be that you live forever.” Conversation starts around 57 minutes in: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSNuB9pj9P8

Saved - January 4, 2026 at 10:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A participant questions vaccine safety and calls for randomized trials comparing vaccinated vs unvaccinated children, alleging data access is blocked. The responder cites MidwesternDoc’s report, argues vaccines have a problematic history (smallpox to Gardasil), and claims data show harm and chronic illness, with examples from practitioners and surveys. They urge independent data review, claim data suppression, and propose that vaccine mandates repeat past mistakes, urging scrutiny and accountability.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

If vaccines are so safe, prove it. There has never been a single randomized trial comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids. Agencies have the funding and the tech, yet refuse. So what happens when you compare vax vs. unvax? They don’t want you to see this data. 🧵

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Did you know that the death rate from measles declined by 98% BEFORE the measles vaccine was introduced? “This is all on the CDC website… That decline had nothing to do with vaccines.” So, if vaccines didn’t do it, what caused that decline from 1900 to 1963? The answer is better nutrition, better sanitation, clean water, etc., according to Attorney Aaron Siri. Yet “science” wants you to believe that vaccines saved the day. But that’s not even the biggest vaccine deception. It’s what happens before they approve these shots for human use. 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that public health authorities deserve credit for the large decline in measles deaths in America that occurred before the first measles vaccine was introduced. They reference data they say is available on the CDC website, noting that between 1900 and 1960–1962 the mortality rate for measles declined by over 98 percent, a trend that existed before the vaccine's introduction in 1963. The speaker stresses that this decline was not caused by the vaccine, since there was no measles vaccine in the early period. They propose several public health factors as contributors to the decline, including nutrition and sanitation, clean water, sewage management, and basic living conditions such as ensuring natural light in tenement buildings. They also highlight quarantine practices and the practice of advising sick individuals to stay at home and rest, even if not the kind of enforced stay-at-home measures discussed in other contexts. The speaker notes that, in the years immediately before vaccination, roughly 400 Americans died per year from measles, averaging about one death per 500,000 people, illustrating that mortality was still a real concern even as the downward trajectory was already underway. The speaker acknowledges that measles can still be lethal in certain contexts and that there were pockets of the United States in the early 1960s that resembled conditions in less developed parts of the world. They emphasize that the declining mortality rate continued after the vaccine was introduced in 1963, describing the trajectory as ongoing and implying that vaccine influence is not the sole or definitive cause of the earlier decline. When addressing contemporary public health messaging, the speaker notes that public health authorities today often claim that measles caused the decline and that the measles vaccine caused the decline in mortality, but they allegedly do not discuss the other public health efforts that contributed. The underlying point is that attribution of the decline is contested, and the role of broad public health measures should be acknowledged alongside vaccination. The speaker repeatedly stresses that the data cited are uncontroversial and data-driven, and that the discussion centers on attribution and emphasis rather than disputing the data itself.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Public health authorities should take credit for the decline in measles deaths in America. They should, but they should take credit in the following way. Between the year 1900, I saw on the CDC website, what I'm about to tell you, and the year 1960, '61, '62, the years before the first measles vaccine in America, 1963, the mortality rate for measles declined by over ninety eight percent. Yes. By over ninety eight percent, that is you can just go pull up the mortality data on the CDC website. This is uncontroversial, it's just data, what I just said. Some people get emotional about it, but it's just data, what I just said. Why would they get emotional? Well, for the reasons we just discussed. That decline had nothing to do with vaccines. You know how I know? There was no measles vaccine. That's how I know. What caused that decline? I think that in part, it's the public health authorities should take a lot of credit for that. Nutrition sanitation. Better sanitation, clean water, getting sewage running out of the streets. Right. Right, all of these things, initiatives to make sure that there's natural light, like remember all the tenement buildings? Yes. All these initiatives, even basic things like quarantine. Oh, if you're sick, not that not the kind of forced kind of stay at home stuff that we're talking about, just if you're sick, hey, maybe you should stay at home in bed kind of stuff. And so that declined ninety eight over ninety eight percent. You know how many people died in the few years, on average a year before there was the first measles vaccine in 1963 when POCs of this country were still like the developed world, around four hundred Americans a year died. That's one in five hundred thousand Americans died of measles in the years before they were vaccine. Every death's a tragedy and measles can still kill people just like any virus can in parts of the world that are really underdeveloped. Any virus can kill children, adults. And there were still pockets of America in the early sixties that were like that. But that declining rate of mortality, it was a trajectory that was ongoing even when the measles vaccine was introduced in '63. So those four hundred deaths, which have now gone down, how much of that is attributable to measles vaccine? How much of it is to the continued efforts of public health agencies? Right? We we that could be debated forever. We don't need to. But the important point is this, long way to answer your question is this. When you listen to public health authorities today, they will say to you measles is what caused the decline. Measles vaccine is what caused the decline in mortality. They never talk about those other things that they did.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-have-vaccines-done

How Much Damage Have Vaccines Done to Society? The data that shows the less appreciated forgotten consequences of vaccination. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Before we get to the data, let’s take a look at the history we were never taught about vaccines. It started with smallpox. The vaccine hit the market in 1798 and often CAUSED outbreaks instead of stopping them. Doctors also saw strange, debilitating injuries they’d never encountered before. Instead of admitting something was wrong, the medical establishment doubled down. And governments around the world mandated the vaccine.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc After taking a deep look at all of the evidence, @MidwesternDoc believes the smallpox vaccine literally reshaped the trajectory of humanity’s health and ushered in the era of chronic illness. Read about that here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-have-vaccines-done

How Much Damage Have Vaccines Done to Society? The data that shows the less appreciated forgotten consequences of vaccination. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

By the late 1800s and early 1900s, other vaccines were rushed out—rabies, typhoid, diphtheria—along with horse-derived antiserums. At the time, quality control was nonexistent. You can guess how that went… “Hot lots” killed or crippled whole groups of people. Doctors documented new conditions—especially brain inflammation (encephalitis)—and they even warned about it in medical journals.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

In the 1940s–50s, the first pertussis vaccine hit the market. It was excellent at causing brain inflammation in children. The effects were undeniable. Entire generations born after the mass adoption of the DPT (diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus) vaccine were changed.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Between the 1950s and 1970s, multiple poorly produced experimental vaccines were rushed out to address non-existent “emergencies.” The public was treated like lab rats and the government repeatedly ignored warnings from their own scientists. Back then, the press still had the guts to report the truth. Along with the public, they demanded answers. Lawsuits piled up. It was a national scandal. So the government was forced to compensate the victims—a rare moment of accountability in vaccine history.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

By the 1980s, the lawsuits over brain damage and sudden infant deaths from the DPT were piling up. So in 1986, Congress gave vaccine makers immunity from liability. Everything changed after the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. They said it was to ensure a stable supply of needed vaccines. But what it really meant was no more lawsuits and no more accountability. The result? A gold rush. The childhood vaccine schedule exploded, right alongside rising rates of chronic illness.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

In 1990, the military gave an experimental anthrax vaccine to troops headed for Iraq. While anthrax was ultimately never used, more than 100,000 servicemen ended up injured. They called it Gulf War Syndrome—a name which leads one to believe he had something to do with geography or the war itself, not a vaccine. Despite this, the Department of Defense mandated it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

In 2010, Merck sold Gardasil with a fear campaign, which remains extremely controversial to this day. A clever marketing campaign tricked women into believing they were all at risk of dying from cervical cancer (even though only 1 in ~38,000 American women dies from it each year). The vaccine caused an extraordinarily high rate of autoimmune disorders. But the CDC and FDA shielded it and still push the vaccine on children—even boys—today.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc As I’m sure you’re very aware, 2021 brought COVID shots. All the same mistakes. Rushed. Mandated. Injury signals buried. Real lives destroyed. And hardly anyone remembers that it’s not the first time. History didn’t just rhyme—it literally copied itself.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc This isn’t just vaccine history—it’s a blueprint for how this keeps happening. We have to break the cycle. For more details and links to deep dives on each of these vaccine disasters, check out @MidwesternDoc's full article. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-have-vaccines-done

How Much Damage Have Vaccines Done to Society? The data that shows the less appreciated forgotten consequences of vaccination. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

According to brave doctors like @MidwesternDoc, vaccines are a primary driver of America’s tsunami of chronic disease. Autoimmune disorders. Neurodevelopmental issues. A massive, silent epidemic. No one has ever run a randomized trial comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids. Let that sink in. Agencies that insist vaccines are safe won’t release their data.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Case reports show vaccines cause brain inflammation. Retrospective studies show higher rates of chronic disease in vaccinated groups. More shots = higher risk. Pediatric practices with low vaccination rates see healthier kids. Thousands upon thousands of real reports from real parents say that their kids changed within days of being vaccinated—sometimes within minutes. But you’ll never see that on the evening news.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Researchers are blocked from studying unvaccinated children. They’ve hid the data away under lock and key. Because they claim it’s “unethical” to study unvaccinated children. lol.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Real doctors have been trying to speak up. Paul Thomas MD ran a pediatric practice in Oregon. He compared outcomes for 2,763 vaccinated kids and 561 unvaccinated kids born into his practice. Unvaccinated kids had dramatically fewer visits for asthma, speech delays, behavioral issues, autism, and more. He published the data and has since lost his medical license.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Other independent surveys showed the same pattern. Generation Rescue’s 2007 survey of over 17,000 children: vaccinated kids had more neurological and chronic issues. Homeschool surveys found vaccinated children had higher rates of chronic illness. The Control Group project surveyed unvaccinated families across the US and showed dramatic differences.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Want to see all the receipts? The full article is loaded with them. Read it all for yourself below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-have-vaccines-done

How Much Damage Have Vaccines Done to Society? The data that shows the less appreciated forgotten consequences of vaccination. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

When agencies refused to release the data, @stkirsch decided to fund the research himself. His surveys found 8–16% of COVID vaccine recipients suffered significant harm. And he didn’t stop there. He ran surveys on childhood vaccines too. Same story: the more doses, the more chronic illness. Even independent statisticians confirmed the data. But the powers that be don’t want you to see it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The great lengths they go to stop this information from seeing the light of day speaks for itself. Today, virtually all medical records are digital. Massive amounts of medical data exist in a format that could easily be used to run studies. And it wouldn’t even be expensive. If vaccines didn’t cause harm, they could prove it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

If vaccines can cause acute encephalitis—recognized even by the Institute of Medicine—what about the more mild injuries? The things we just accept and never pinpoint the cause. Or the things that take years to develop before we finally acknowledge the symptoms. What if these subtle brain injuries have reshaped society?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

As mass vaccination ramped up in the 1940s and 50s, America saw an explosion of: • ADHD and learning disabilities •Speech delays •Psychiatric disorders •Violent crime These weren’t isolated tragedies—they changed lives then and have changed generations ever since. Hardly anyone remains untouched.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

In his 1985 book, DPT: A Shot in the Dark, Harris Coulter showed how traits of vaccine-induced brain damage matched the profiles of violent criminals. Hyperactivity. Impulsivity. Aggression. Sleep disturbances. Seizure disorders. He even linked the rise in crime and declining SAT scores to vaccination rates. If this is true, imagine how different the world would be today if it weren’t for mass vaccination. People have been led to believe that society would somehow have been wiped out by what they call preventable disease. But it sounds like the opposite may be true.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

What if mass vaccination is slowly wiping us out? What if vaccines didn’t prevent infectious disease, but rewired who we are, making us less empathetic, more aggressive, and harder to educate? What if our society today is paying the price in ways most of us refuse to see?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @stkirsch If you’ve ever wondered why so many people seem so disconnected, angry, and hard to reach... If you’ve watched education decline and crime rise... Maybe it’s time to ask the questions no one wants us to ask.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

This isn’t about being anti-vaccine. It’s about acknowledging what we’ve ignored for too long… That real harm exists. That profit and liability shields hide that harm. And that if we don’t face it and break the cycle, it will keep happening. Until it breaks us—for good.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @stkirsch Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-much-damage-have-vaccines-done

How Much Damage Have Vaccines Done to Society? The data that shows the less appreciated forgotten consequences of vaccination. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @stkirsch For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-dont-tell-you-about-c-sections

What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections Exploring the short and long term consequences of a frequently unnecessary procedure midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @stkirsch What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @stkirsch The FDA’s 50-Year War on the Safest Painkiller Ever Discovered https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-remarkable-history-and-safety

The Remarkable History and Safety of DMSO Please share your experiences with DMSO with the readers here! midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @stkirsch While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. --> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/11lRqEVGwT

Saved - December 24, 2025 at 11:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion questions why the hepatitis B vaccine is given to all newborns, arguing it targets adult risk groups but is mandated at birth. It references historical safety concerns, regulatory actions, alleged underreporting of adverse effects, and claims of political and financial motives. The thread cites studies, media segments, and a full report urging ACIP to reassess the newborn mandate and emphasize informed consent.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Hepatitis B vaccine is mandated for children to attend public schools in 46 states. Hepatitis B is transmitted via needles or sexual contact, yet this vaccine is pushed on babies on their first day of life. Why? We finally have some answers. Here’s the real reason every newborn is forced to get it—and why that could finally be changing. 🧵

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

For decades, @MidwesternDoc has tried to answer the question: Why do we inject a vaccine meant for adult risk groups into every newborn? The truth reveals a story of shaky science, ignored safety signals, and hidden agendas. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get

Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get the Dangerous Hepatitis B Vaccine? The suppressed history behind the Hep B vaccine and the actual risks and benefits of it we are never told about. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The debate isn’t new. The hepatitis B vaccine has been hotly debated for years. But the debate is getting a little more, shall we say, weird. Check out this clip from @HighWireTalk featuring none other than Dr. Demetre Daskalakis.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the hepatitis B vaccine agenda and controversy around its use for newborns. Speaker 1 describes an upcoming September meeting where hepatitis B vaccine is on the agenda, predicting an effort to change the birth dose so that children wouldn’t receive it at birth. They say that if a mother has good prenatal care and known hepatitis B status, that may not matter, but if a mother does not attend prenatal care, the child would have only one opportunity to receive the vaccine. Speaker 0 reacts strongly, arguing that the person promoting the vaccine is inappropriately chosen to advocate for it. They state that the vaccine “was made for people who partake in promiscuous sex with multiple partners or share heroin needles,” and disclaim any direct accusation about the person’s needle-sharing, while asserting that this individual fits a certain group. They question why this person should mandate a hepatitis B vaccine for their child, insisting that in the United States people should be allowed to live freely, but not have the government or advocates push a vaccine tied to a particular lifestyle onto a newborn. Speaker 0 contends that the day-one vaccination would not provide long-lasting protection, especially if the person’s argument is framed as addressing a disease tied to sexual activity. They point out that the majority of pregnant individuals in America are not hepatitis B positive (citing a statistic they recall), and ask why their child should receive an injection for a sexually transmitted infection on day one of life. Speaker 0 challenges religious leaders who support the vaccination program, asking what they would say to families who do not plan for their child to engage in the behaviors associated with hepatitis B transmission. They question the alignment with religious beliefs, asking believers of various faiths whether they intend for their child to share heroin needles. They suggest a paradox in relating the injection to the condition of being created in the image and likeness of God, and conclude with a provocative remark about losing sight of religious or moral principles. Throughout, the speakers frame the hepatitis B vaccination strategy as an ideological fight over who should decide what is injected into newborns, juxtaposing public health goals with concerns about personal freedom, lifestyle, and religious beliefs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, look at who they're parading around in the news saying this guy should decide who's injecting what into your body. Speaker 1: Hepatitis B vaccine is on the agenda for the meeting, in September. I predict that what they're going to do is try to change the birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine so that kids don't get it when they're born. So if you have a mother who is well connected to care, you know her hepatitis B status, that may not matter very much. But if you have a mother who's not gone to prenatal care, who comes in to deliver, we have one bite at that apple so that child gets that important hepatitis B vaccine. Why does it matter? Speaker 0: I mean, you can't make this stuff up. Right? That's who they decide should go out and sell us on a hepatitis B vaccine. Let's make one thing clear. That is a man who probably needs a hepatitis B vaccine. Okay? That right there, just hold on that image. That is who this vaccine was made for. Full stop. They said it when they were designing it. We need to make a vaccine for people who partake in promiscuous sex with multiple partners or share heroin needles. Okay? Now, I'm not gonna accuse this guy of sharing heroin needles. They don't need to. We can see that he meets, you know, group A. Right? And so, why should this guy demand that my child be given the hepatitis B vaccine, which I hope, you know, look, I have nothing against it. This is The United States Of America. Let your freak flag fly. But you do not get to mandate your freak flag lifestyle on my day one old baby. Come on. Let's just be realistic about this. Alright? I get it. It might seem like the end of the world to you. I don't know why because that vaccine being given on day one will never last long enough to help you in the middle of your sex rave. That's just that's just the the the reality of these products. But my God, if that's the best that they can roll out and this is the is the war, this is the hill they're ready to die on, hepatitis B, every mother's tested for it. We know if you're positive or not, and if you are not positive with hepatitis B, which is I think ninety nine point nine five percent of you, if I remember the stats being correct, that are pregnant in America, then why do I need to inject my child with their first sexually transmitted disease on day one of life? I want to ask every minister and every priest and every religious leader in this nation and around the world that says, you know, that we've gotta support this vaccine program, that this is given to us by God. Really? Whether you're a Muslim, or a Christian, or you're Jewish, or whatever faith it is, do you plan on having your child sharing heroin needles? Is that a part of your religious belief? Do you believe that there's an original sin that God forgot about which is sexually transmitted diseases? And while they take their first gasp of the precious air here on this beautiful planet, right behind that should come an injection with their first sexually transmitted disease. Because this is what it means to be created in the image and likeness of God. Boy, have we lost our way.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Just weeks ago, former CDC director Susan Monarez seemed unable to explain why we vaccinate newborns for hepatitis B. The hepatitis B virus is, after all, a bloodborne pathogen with transmission typically occurring through unprotected sex, blood exchanges like shared needles, and mother-to-child transmission during childbirth. Only one of these risk factors is relevant to a newborn, but expectant mothers are typically screened for hepatitis B during their prenatal care anyway. So why exactly do we give it to newborns? Does anyone know? Are we protecting them for a lifetime of unprotected sex and drugs? Does any protective effect from the vaccine even last that long?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Menares and an interlocutor debate the science behind pediatric COVID vaccination and routine immunizations, focusing on transmission, hospitalization, and risk. - The interlocutor asks whether the COVID vaccine prevents transmission. Speaker 1 answer: the vaccine can reduce viral load in individuals who are infected, and with reduced viral load, there is reduced transmission. The interlocutor reframes, insisting that the vaccine does not prevent transmission and notes decreasing effectiveness over time, citing Omicron data showing around 16% reduction when there is a reduction. - On hospitalization for children 18 and under: Speaker 0 asserts the vaccine does not reduce hospitalization for 18-year-olds; statistics are inconclusive due to small numbers of hospitalizations in that age group (approximately 76 million people aged 18 in the country, with 183 deaths and a few thousand hospitalizations in 2020–2021; numbers have since dropped). The argument emphasizes a need to discuss the issue. - On death for children 18 and under: Speaker 0 says the vaccine does not reduce the death rate; claims there is no statistical evidence that it reduces deaths. Speaker 1 responds with a more cautious stance: “It can,” but Speaker 0 counters, calling that an insufficient answer. - The discussion references the vaccine approval process and ongoing debates in vaccine committees. The interlocutor states that when the vaccine was approved for six months and older, the discussion acknowledged no proof of reduction in hospitalization or death. The argument asserts that the justification for vaccination is based on antibody generation rather than clear hospitalization/death data. The interlocutor contends that immunology measurements (antibody production) do not necessarily justify vaccination frequency. - The core debate centers on what the science supports for vaccinating six-month-olds and the benefits versus risks. The interlocutor argues there is no hospitalization or death benefit for vaccination in this age group, and notes a known risk of myocarditis in younger populations, estimated somewhere between six and ten per ten thousand, which the interlocutor claims is greater than the risk of hospitalization or death being measurable. - The exchange then shifts to changing the childhood vaccine schedule, particularly the hepatitis B vaccine given to newborns when the mother is not hepatitis B positive. The interlocutor asks for the medical or scientific reason to give a hepatitis B vaccine to a newborn with an uninfected mother, arguing that the discussion should focus on whether to change the schedule rather than declaring all vaccines as good or bad. - Speaker 1 says they agreed with considering the science and would not pre-commit to approving all ACIP recommendations without the science. Speaker 0 disagrees, asserting their position that the debate should center on the medical rationale for these specific vaccines and schedules, not on a blanket endorsement of vaccines. - Throughout, the dialogue emphasizes examining the medical reasons and evidence for specific vaccines and schedules, rather than broad generalizations about vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Menares, I agree with you completely that we need to restore trust in public health. But in order to do so, we have to have a discussion about the actual science, and we can't have a discussion of this, you know, is about all vaccines are good, all vaccines are bad. This is about specific vaccines. It's about specific age groups. It's about specific policies. Does the COVID vaccine prevent transmission? Speaker 1: The COVID vaccine can reduce viral load in individuals who are Speaker 0: Does it prevent transmission? Speaker 1: When you have reduced viral load, you will have reduced transmission. Speaker 0: But in other words, it doesn't prevent transmission. You can still transmit the virus if you've had the vaccine. In fact, there's been reduced ability to interfere with transmission over time. And what we've found is the most recent one since Omicron is down around 16% reduction if there is a reduction. Does the COVID vaccine reduce hospitalization for children 18? Speaker 1: It can. Speaker 0: It doesn't. The statistics are inconclusive, and the reason you can't prove that it does is there's so few people 18 that go to the hospital. The the numbers are extraordinarily small. There's like seventy six million kids 18 in our country, a hundred and eighty three died, and a few thousand went to the hospital in 2020 and 2021. And since then, the numbers have dropped precipitously, and the idea and the issue needs to be discussed. But the COVID vaccine is not reducing hospitalization. It's not statistically significant. Does the COVID vaccine reduce the rate of death for children 18? Speaker 1: It can. Speaker 0: Once again, it can. That's a ridiculous answer. No. It doesn't. And there is no statistical evidence that it does reduce the death rate. These are statistics. We've looked at it. When they approved it, they had this discussion at the vaccine committee that we've been talking about. During the discussion, they acknowledged that there was no proof of reduction in hospitalization or in death. So what they did is they said, what can we use to try to make people take this vaccine? They came up with this. They said that if we give you a COVID vaccine, you make antibodies. So really the a whole recommendation for having a COVID vaccine from six months up is not based on hospitalization data, not based on deaths. It's based on whether you make antibodies or not. And what people fail to see from this is I can inject you with a foreign protein every week and measure antibodies. You'll make antibodies every time. It just means immunology work has nothing to do with whether you should get a vaccine every week. So when we're discussing the science here, we have to discuss what is the science in favor of giving a vaccine to a six month old, and what are the benefits from that? And there is no benefit of hospitalization or death. And then what would the risks of the vaccine be? We have large population studies of the risks of the vaccine in younger people. And it turns out that you don't see this as much if you look at the general population. But once you start isolating in by age group, which you have to do in COVID because there's such a disparity among age group, you find that there is a risk of myocarditis, a significant event. It's somewhere between six and eight and ten thousand, but that's much greater than the risk of hospitalization or death, which are not even measurable because they're so small. So you resisted firing people who have this idea that the COVID vaccine should be at six months. That's what this is about. You didn't resist firing the beautiful the perfect beautiful scientists that are career people and unobjective and unbiased. You wouldn't fire the people who are saying that we have to vaccinate our kids at six months of age. That's who you refuse to fire. Speaker 1: So, that assertion, is not, commensurate with the experience that I had with the individuals who are identified to be fined. Speaker 0: Did any of the people you refused to fire any of the people you refused to believe that we should change the vaccine schedule and no longer force six month old kids to take it? Every one of them was adamant we should keep it at six months. Everybody's alarmed. We're gonna change the childhood routine. Well, we should. There is no medical reason. What is the medical reason to give a hepatitis b vaccine to a newborn whose mom has no hepatitis? Speaker 1: So none of the discussion points that you just brought up were ever Speaker 0: That's changing the childhood schedule. Check do your child were Regular order. Regular order. Your time. You have your time, Bernie. I got mine. Look, this is the debate over changing the childhood schedule. The hepatitis b vaccine on the schedule is given to newborns. What is the medical scientific reason and proof for giving a newborn a hepatitis b vaccine if the mom is hep b negative? Speaker 1: I wanna go back to the assertion association. Speaker 0: What is the medical reason for giving a hepatitis b vaccine to a newborn? See, everybody's like blithely going along, we can't change the childhood. You're somehow terrible if you wanna change the childhood. We should be discussing what is the childhood vaccine schedule, and you should be the burden should be on you. You wanna make all the kids take this? The burden is upon you and the people you wouldn't fire to prove to us that we need to give our six month old a COVID vaccine and that we need to give our one day old a hepatitis b vaccine. That's what the debate ought to be about, not whether all vaccines are good or whether we live in a house in one land. Speaker 1: I actually agree with you, and I was open to the science. I just would not pre commit to approving all the ACIP recommendations without the science. Speaker 0: Untrue.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The many concerns surrounding giving the hepatitis B vaccine to newborns are not unfounded. The concern is not simply a matter of being anti-vax. And concern about this vaccine certainly isn’t anti-science. Let’s take a look at the science. The vaccine was first introduced in the 1980s. And early warnings came fast. Respected vaccine researcher Bohn Dunbar exposed the pattern of autoimmune complications after her own brother was injured by the hepatitis vaccine in 1994. A 1998 article in the journal Science highlighted the growing concerns surrounding the vaccine, including the fact that attorneys representing more than 15,000 people sued France’s government for downplaying the risks and exaggerating its benefits. France then suspended hepatitis B vaccination in schools.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

A 1999 Congressional hearing laid it out: • Numerous severe adverse reactions including death, seizures, autism, dysautonomia, MS, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, and liver cancer. • Adverse reaction reports were ignored or dismissed, and short trial durations missed delayed reactions. • Parents were not informed of the risks, newborns were vaccinated without parental consent, and parents were threatened with intervention from social services. • Vaccinating low-risk newborns for an adult-associated disease is just plain inappropriate. • The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was denying most claims. That same year, fewer than 100 U.S. children under age 2 got hepatitis B. The math doesn’t add up. It never has.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk Also in 1999, back when it was actually possible to find a little truth about Big Pharma on TV, ABC News aired an entire program addressing the hepatitis B vaccine. They even included vaccine-injured patients and parents of severely injured children.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The program examines a heated controversy surrounding the hepatitis B vaccine, which is required for schoolchildren in many states and is administered routinely to millions of babies each year. Proponents describe vaccines as highly effective and safe, while opponents argue that the vaccine can trigger serious and mysterious illnesses or death in certain individuals. The report notes that hepatitis B is transmitted through infected blood or bodily fluids (similar to AIDS) and can be passed from infected mothers to their children. It is described as a life-threatening, potentially fatal disease of the liver, with four to five thousand Americans dying annually and worldwide about 200 million chronically infected. In the United States, more than 200,000 new cases occur yearly. Initially, the CDC adopted a broad vaccination policy, starting with health care workers at risk, but soon expanded to newborns nationwide despite the relatively small risk of infection in young children. The stated public health rationale was to prevent infection in the 20,000 children per year who might become infected in the first five years of life, in addition to the 6,000–7,000 infants infected at birth. However, from near the outset, some individuals reported serious adverse events after vaccination. Anecdotal reports include a Navy flight surgeon, Doctor Deborah Eggles, who describes abnormal brain scans, spinal fluid, and blood tests following vaccination, as well as a spectrum of severe symptoms reported by several other patients. Some families have filed lawsuits against vaccine makers and received settlements, though manufacturers argue there is no proven link between the vaccine and these illnesses. Federal package inserts acknowledge rare but serious adverse experiences after vaccination, including multiple sclerosis, arthritis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and lupus. Medical experts featured present divergent views. Doctor Harold Margolis of the CDC explains the argument for vaccination, citing the risk of hepatitis B infection without vaccination and the need to prevent disease, even if adverse events occur in a small minority. Academic and industry voices, including Doctor Bonnie Dunbar and Doctor Robert Schirar of Merck, acknowledge that some individuals may have adverse reactions but maintain that vaccines are highly effective and safe, and that many people are better off vaccinated than exposed to the natural disease. The film highlights cases where the vaccine is suspected to have caused severe outcomes. Ronnie Allen, once a healthy preschooler, developed a life-threatening arthritis after the hepatitis B shot and underwent chemotherapy multiple times; his doctor suspects a vaccine trigger. Other cases cited include three-day-old Ben Converse with seizures, Nikki Sexton who died of heart failure three days after vaccination, and Lila Belkin who died shortly after receiving a first shot. Pathologists and families suggest vaccine links in these deaths, though statistical analyses indicate such newborn fatalities are extremely rare among millions vaccinated since 1991. The program also covers policy and civil liberty questions: should vaccination be mandatory for school attendance, or should parents have the right to exemptions? Some families, like the Saturns of Wyoming, faced expulsion from school after refusing the shot, illustrating the tension between public health policy and parental rights. Public opinion in the piece leans toward parental choice, with calls to place decision-making back in the hands of families rather than authorities. The narrative ends with ongoing uncertainty about long-term outcomes and the possible consequences of airing such controversy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Important medical controversy, serious new questions about a vaccine most schoolchildren are forced to get. One given every year to millions of babies. Speaker 1: We just thought it was like all the immunization shots. We were doing it to protect our child. Speaker 0: It's the hepatitis B vaccine. These parents thought it would protect their child. No one told them there might be risks. Speaker 2: I wish we'd known that before receiving the vaccine. Speaker 0: An effective weapon against a life threatening illness. Speaker 3: Vaccines are highly effective, and I think that vaccines are very safe. Speaker 0: But these people claim it backfired. Speaker 4: Within three weeks of the Speaker 5: third shot, I lost my vision. Speaker 0: Is it smart preventative medicine or an unnecessary risk? Sylvia Chase asks, when it comes to hepatitis B, who's calling the shots? Tonight, Friday, 01/22/1999, after this brief message. '20 twenty Friday continues. Now Hugh Downs. Speaker 6: Now a medical controversy that's pitting some parents against the law and leaving others searching for answers of what to do for their children. It's a dispute over a vaccine that is required for school aged children in 36 states that many well respected health organizations say is safe and effective, and yet some people believe it can be the cause of severe and mystifying illness, even death. And as Sylvia Chase explains, this fierce debate has some parents defying the law to prevent their children from being vaccinated. Speaker 4: Two years ago, Ronnie Allen was the all American boy. Speaker 2: He was Speaker 1: a vibrant, healthy picture of health child, very happy, big and strong. Speaker 4: And about to start preschool in suburban St. Louis. First though, he was required to have a vaccination against hepatitis B. Speaker 1: We just thought it was like all the immunization shots. We were doing it to protect our child. Did you Speaker 4: have any doubts about giving him the shot Speaker 1: at first? I questioned why a four year old boy would need a hepatitis B shot. He was certainly at no risk or was not exposed. He Speaker 4: got the shot the day before Halloween. Speaker 7: Happy Halloween! Speaker 4: And he nearly didn't make it to Christmas. He was diagnosed with a rare and life threatening form of arthritis. He's had chemotherapy 10 times. Ronnie is in constant pain. What made you sick, do you know? Speaker 7: Mostly the shot. What shot? The hepatitis shot. Speaker 4: Ronnie's doctor thinks the vaccination could have triggered his illness. And some scientists believe that in certain people, the vaccine can be worse than the disease. Yet it's the law in most states that children cannot attend school without first having the three dose vaccination, which prevents hepatitis b, a disease caused by exposure to infected blood or bodily fluids. Like AIDS, it is spread through sex with infected partners, needle sharing among infected drug users, and it may be passed by infected mothers to their children. Speaker 8: It is a silent infection that causes a silent disease. Speaker 4: Doctor Harold Margolis, Director of Infectious Diseases at the Centers for Disease Control. He says infected people may be symptom free for years as the hepatitis b virus assaults the liver, a vital organ whose failure is fatal. Four to five thousand Americans die annually from hepatitis b. Worldwide, two hundred million are chronically infected with hepatitis b. And in The United States alone, there are more than two hundred thousand new cases yearly. Speaker 8: The only way that we know to prevent it is to have widespread vaccination. Speaker 4: When a vaccine was introduced in 1986, it was seen as a medical miracle. Hepatitis b like polio and smallpox could be wiped out. The CDC adopted a broad vaccination policy, first inoculating health care workers at risk from exposure to infected blood. But almost from the beginning, some people reported serious complaints. Within three weeks of the Speaker 5: third shot, I lost my vision. Speaker 4: Doctor. Deborah Eggles was a Navy flight surgeon, one of the first vaccinated. Speaker 5: Every time they test me, it's abnormal. My brain scan is abnormal. My spinal fluid is abnormal. My blood is abnormal. My physical examination is abnormal. Speaker 4: These medical workers say they were healthy. Then they were vaccinated. Speaker 9: Within two months, I was very ill. I was in ill in bed. Speaker 10: Most of us have pretty much the same type of symptoms. We have joint pain, muscle pain, muscle fatigue. Speaker 3: I can't feed myself. I can't bathe myself. Speaker 4: Many here have filed lawsuits against the vaccine makers and received settlements from them. Although the manufacturers don't believe there is a link between the vaccine and these illnesses, package inserts now alert doctors that serious adverse experiences have been reported after vaccination, including multiple sclerosis, arthritis, Guillain Barre syndrome, and lupus. Speaker 11: Everything that was happening to me was listed on that insert as a very rare incident, but it all fit. These people were completely healthy. Speaker 4: Doctor. Bonnie Dunbar, a cellular biologist at Baylor College of Medicine, believes that in certain people, a genetic component sets off an explosive chain of events. Speaker 9: The only thing that happened is they took this vaccine, and within a month, most of these people have had completely debilitating, lifestyle changes. Speaker 4: But the CDC believed there was no proof the problems were caused by the vaccine and the benefits outweighed the risks. So the agency next endorsed mandatory vaccination of newborns, even though the risk of hepatitis B infection is small in children. Speaker 8: There are about six to seven thousand children who were being infected from their mother at birth and about another twenty thousand children who were being infected in the first five years of lives. Speaker 4: How did this other twenty thousand get hepatitis B? Speaker 8: Someone else in their family through close interpersonal contact. Speaker 4: But in other words, you're saying that because you couldn't reach the twenty six thousand children a year who you believe are getting hepatitis B either from their mothers or from their families, you decided to vaccinate all the children in The United States? Speaker 8: That's correct. And in fact, that is well a accepted public health approach and policy. Speaker 4: But the approach and policy to vaccinate so many children also led to increased reports of adverse events in children. Three day old Ben Converse's seizures began less than twenty four hours after his first shot. Now two years old, Ben is developmentally disabled. Thirty three hours after his vaccination, 13 old Nikki Sexton's heart stopped. The coroner said it was sudden infant death or SIDS, a broad category often used when a healthy baby dies. But a pathologist hired by the Sexton family concluded that Nikki Sexton's heart failure was brought on by the vaccine. Speaker 12: She was an incredibly healthy baby. Speaker 4: Lila Belkin's death was also attributed to SIDS. She had received a first shot at six days old, a second one a month later. She was at virtually no risk for the disease as her parents later learned. Speaker 2: How is a baby possibly gonna get hepatitis b? It's ridiculous to give this vaccine to a child. I wish we'd known that before receiving the the vaccine. No one told us. Speaker 4: You did what the doctor told you to do? Speaker 12: I did what the doctor told me to do. Yeah. Of course. Speaker 4: And they didn't say that there were any reported cases of deaths or serious reactions? No. Nothing. On 09/16/1998, missus Belkin nursed Lila at 05:30AM. Not long after, she found her daughter pale and cold. Speaker 12: She she died early in the morning, about sixteen hours after after the vaccination. Speaker 4: An analysis of federal vaccine statistics shows that such newborn deaths are barely measurable when compared with the millions of babies vaccinated since the mandatory shot policy took effect in 1991. It's a fraction of a fraction even when it comes to serious injuries, lending support to the vaccine proponent's position that the shots do not cause harm. Speaker 3: These are very rare events. Speaker 4: Doctor Robert Schirar, a vaccine manufacturer Merck and Company, estimates that perhaps twenty million children and adults have been vaccinated safely. Speaker 3: I know that people have developed serious illness following the administration of vaccine, but I don't truly believe that those illnesses were caused by the vaccine. Speaker 4: Is there a legitimate position to be taken here that some small percentage will have bad outcomes, but it is worth it? We need to wipe out this disease. Speaker 3: Some people who get vaccinated will develop certain adverse reactions or certain conditions that may or may not be related to the vaccine. I do think that vaccines are highly effective, and I think that vaccines are very safe. And there's no doubt in my mind that that, people are much better off taking the vaccine than they are being exposed to the natural disease process. Speaker 4: But when it comes to children taking the vaccine, there's no choice. They can't go to school without it. That's the law in '36 states. Speaker 7: The decision ultimately needs to be in the parents' hands. The parents are gonna be the ones living with the consequences. Speaker 4: Sue Blevins, director of the Institute for Health Freedom, a nonprofit organization that advocates patients' rights. Speaker 7: I don't think the government has a role to come in and mandate for children that are clearly not at risk that they need to receive a hepatitis b vaccine. Speaker 4: But parents who have made a stand against the government have paid a price. The Saturn family of Hewlett, Wyoming opposed the shots on both religious and medical grounds. Speaker 9: I do not want to be in the generation of parents who gives up the right to choose what goes into my child's body. Speaker 4: But the school board refused their request for an exemption, and this fall, Alex was kicked out of seventh grade. Speaker 13: I miss that I don't get to Speaker 1: play football and basketball and that kind of stuff. Speaker 4: There have been reports around the country of other children expelled from school when parents refused the hepatitis shot. Speaker 13: I think it's pretty stupid not to let me in school if I don't get the shot. Speaker 4: Palm Beach seventh grader Joshua Say was expelled for failing to have his shots. His mother was worried about possible side effects. Speaker 14: The more investigation that I do about the vaccine, I am even more convinced that I don't want him to have it. Speaker 4: As for Ronnie Allen, it's still touch and go. His arthritis stabilized enough to permit him to start kindergarten in September. But as long as he lives, he'll need medication. Can they assure you that the deterioration has stopped? There are no assurances. They don't Speaker 1: know what's gonna happen. They've told Speaker 9: us that. We know that. Speaker 4: And does Ronnie know Speaker 1: that? No. Speaker 4: Are you fearful of the consequences of 2020 airing this controversy? Speaker 3: Yes. I am, Sylvia. And I'll tell you why. I I think that some people would probably not get vaccinated against hepatitis b. And I do think that's unfortunate because I think most people one time another are at risk of getting the disease. Speaker 6: You know, make it the parents' decision instead of someone else telling you you have to do it. Speaker 4: Ronnie's dad thinks it should be up to families. Speaker 6: If they don't feel that it's necessary, let them make the choice and say, no.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The untold history of the hepatitis B vaccine is jaw-dropping. From contaminated trials to secret CDC rationales—it’s all here in @MidwesternDoc's full report: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get

Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get the Dangerous Hepatitis B Vaccine? The suppressed history behind the Hep B vaccine and the actual risks and benefits of it we are never told about. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The science is and has been stacked against this vaccine. Studies showed hepatitis B vaccination increased the risk of MS, lupus, arthritis, and other autoimmune conditions. In France, cases of MS spiked 65% after a national campaign. A CDC dataset showed a 12X higher autism risk when given in the first 30 days of life!

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Why does the hepatitis B vaccine cause so much damage? Autoimmune conditions caused by the vaccine are likely due to its antigen having a significant overlap with human myelin. The molecular mimicry of the vaccine was denied because it couldn’t be proven. A 1994 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report noted that, although preliminary data existed for many of the reactions attributed to the hepatitis B vaccine, no further research had been conducted. Wow, thanks IOM.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The trials were a joke. They monitored “side effects” for a mere 4–5 days. And the placebos they used? No, not saline—they were other vaccines or even aluminum adjuvants! Are you kidding me?? Serious reactions—sometimes fatal—were reclassified as SIDS or coincidence.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

If transmission is typically due to adult risk factors, why not give it only to adults at risk? Healthcare workers, IV drug users, and gay men with multiple partners… Studies have shown that it can dramatically reduce cases in these groups. Why infants? There is virtually no risk, and immunity does, in fact, wane. So what is the point?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The CDC’s main argument is prevention of mother-to-child transmission. But nearly all U.S. expectant mothers are screened for hepatitis B during pregnancy. And infection rates are under 0.5%! By the numbers, millions of babies must be vaccinated to prevent a single severe outcome. And that’s not an exaggeration. And if mom’s status is unknown, it’s actually mandated in many states to screen newborns for hepatitis B anyway.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

So why the universal newborn mandate? A former ACIP insider revealed the dark truth: It’s not about maternal transmission. It’s about capturing a “captive audience” in the hospital—before at-risk youth slip through the cracks later in life. So, because the CDC was failing to reach inner-city teens, they decided to vaccinate every baby in America. It was never, ever medically justified—it was bureaucratic convenience disguised as science. Let that sink in.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The hepatitis B vaccine’s dark history will leave you speechless. Were you vaccinated for hep B? What about your children? @MidwesternDoc's full report is a must-read. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get

Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get the Dangerous Hepatitis B Vaccine? The suppressed history behind the Hep B vaccine and the actual risks and benefits of it we are never told about. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The history is disturbing. The first hepatitis B vaccines were plasma-derived—actually using infected human blood. It even involved chimpanzee-human blood exchanges. This was during the early AIDS crisis in New York, San Francisco, and LA. Remember: HIV is considered to have come from a chimpanzee virus. Sounds risky. Merck then rushed out the first recombinant GMO vaccine in 1986.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes the plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine as derived from “the most dangerous starting material” and asserts the starting material was blood heavily contaminated with HIV, collected from New York heroin users during what is recognized as the world’s first AIDS outbreak. He notes the vaccine’s development began with funds from Doctor Fauci’s agency, in collaboration with Tuskegee researchers, to cross-connect arteries of tranquillised chimpanzees and comatose humans, with mixed raw blood flowing between groups of chimps and humans to train the chimps’ immune systems on human hepatitis virus. The vaccine inventors warned it might work the other way as well and claims several chimpanzees tested positive for ancestors to HIV and Kaposi’s sarcoma herpes virus, the deadly combination behind AIDS; this serial passage between species is called gain of function. He concludes this created the safest vaccine we’ve ever used. Speaker 1 adds a claim about a hidden starting point: the blood used was heavily contaminated with HIV from New York heroin users, and that the vaccine’s development involved financing from Fauci’s agency and collaboration with Tuskegee researchers to cross-link chimpanzee and human circulatory systems. He states that the serial passage of viruses between species is now called gain of function and asserts this process produced HIV and Kaposi’s sarcoma herpes virus, and suggests the vaccine’s safety is paradoxical given these origins. Speaker 2 emphasizes responsibility and risk, noting AIDS’ cause was unknown at the time but fear centered on potential contamination of the vaccine with whatever caused AIDS. HIV was “sort of hanging over this vaccine like a cloud,” though he claims HIV couldn’t survive the treatments given to the vaccine. Speaker 0 transitions to Part II, a deep dive into the vaccine timeline, aiming to quickly reach the AIDS timeline ramifications. Speaker 3 provides a timeline framework: well-documented events through May 1983 to set the stage for two fiercely contested events now resolved by a federal investigation. Speaker 2 lists milestones: - 1950s: The world’s earliest confirmed HIV-positive being is a chimpanzee used to develop hepatitis B vaccines. - 1960s: Chimpanzees and New York heroin users cross-transfuse raw blood to generate chimpanzee antigens to fight human hepatitis. - 1972: Scientists at Doctor Fauci’s agency announce chimpanzee antigens protect humans from hepatitis B; first patent filed for a human vaccine made from chimpanzee antigens. - 1973: The world’s first recognized AIDS outbreak occurs among New York heroin users, the first group injected with chimpanzee plasma. - 1974: Thirteen thousand New York gay men recruited to test the vaccines. - 1975: NYBC and Merck file three patents, citing five vaccine examples all made from pure chimpanzee antigens; a circular extraction method akin to dialysis to extract large amounts of antigens for mass production. - 1978: After years of testing, nationwide placebo-controlled trials begin on gay men with NYBC’s New York trial and CDC trials mainly in California; first HIV-positive blood samples found in gay men, all collected from the cohort, all of the never-before-seen subtype B. - 1979: September—ten months into the trial—the scientist in charge wants to abort due to an unexplainable flare-up in precisely 11 participants who received the vaccine; aborting would harm the vaccine’s reputation. CDC soon reports unexplainable Kaposi’s sarcoma cases in gay men, noting that precisely eleven had the flare-up as of September 1979; by December, 19 cases and the first death, marking the onset of the world's second AIDS outbreak affecting the second group inoculated with chimpanzee plasma-derived vaccines. - 1981: A cancer researcher suggests a new infectious agent with a 50% mortality rate may be causing Kaposi’s sarcoma cases in vaccine trial sites and claims it was transmitted in the vaccine as disease progression occurred quickly in trial participants; trial scientists confirm incubation periods differ and are longer in gay men not in the trial. In the next 15 months, another 593 cases emerge and 41% die. Merck announces Heptavax B, a third US brand for domestic market; original HBVax and NYBC B Vax offered only overseas; a compromise to get FDA approval makes the new version from human blood, but without the circular chimpanzee extraction method it’s “too expensive” for large-scale use. - 1982: CDC names the disease AIDS; CDC asserts the FDA-approved vaccine uses only human blood, distancing it from earlier vaccines; WHO warns AIDS may be caused by a virus in the vaccine’s plasma. - May 1983: French scientists identify the causal virus, enabling testing of archived blood samples; it was a chimpanzee virus, and KS lesions required co-infection with a second virus found in those chimpanzees. This discovery enables verifying the AIDS origin theory: vaccine transmission by comparing HIV rates between men randomly given the hepatitis B vaccine versus a placebo during the trials. Speaker 3 notes two pivotal events in their chimp vax preprint, now settled, and states that in June 1983 two Fauci-associated scientists claimed infection rates in the New York trial were similar between vaccine and placebo; internally, they say Fauci’s scientists spread disinformation to defend the chimpanzee vaccine invention. Speaker 2 contends that the CDC claimed no difference in rates in 1984 but that the private study remains unreleased; the analysis implies nearly all HIV infections occurred in vaccinated participants, not placebo, based on limited data and interpretation. The narrative argues the CDC private study would have shown high HIV rates among the vaccine group, but details were obscured. It alleges the CDC’s withheld study used skewed comparisons to mask vaccine-associated HIV transmission. Speaker 3 briefly references Africa’s rollout in 1984, claiming AIDS emerged there a year after a symposium and that FDA officials shifted from chimpanzee vaccines to the human-blood Heptavax, enabling continued overseas sales. It asserts chimpanzee-based vaccines were widely used in poor countries by 1986, with Africa’s initial infections concentrated in newborns and young women; the WHO suppressed findings that HIV spread via medical injections, not needles alone, to protect immunization programs. Retroactive testing allegedly shows HIV was not present in most African countries before vaccination; after vaccination began, infection rates rose in certain regions. The speaker notes a group, ChimpFacts, as a best account of probable HIV origins, but mainstream preprint servers rejected it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And thus we had the so called plasma derived hepatitis B vaccine, a vaccine that was made from no doubt the most dangerous starting material that we ever used. Speaker 1: His book clarifies that the starting material was blood heavily contaminated with HIV, collected from New York heroin users. They were suffering a junky pneumonia at the time, now recognised as the world's first AIDS outbreak. His book left out that this vaccine's development began by using funds from Doctor Fauci's agency, in collaboration with Tuskegee researchers, to cross connect arteries of tranquillised chimpanzees and comatose humans. Mixed raw blood flowed between groups of chimps and humans to train the chimpanzees' immune systems on human hepatitis virus. The vaccine inventors warned it might work the other way as well. Indeed, several of the chimpanzees later tested positive for the closest ancestors to both HIV and Kaposi's sarcoma herpes virus, the deadly combination that sparked the AIDS pandemic. This serial passage of viruses between species is now called gain of function. Speaker 0: That I would argue created the safest vaccine we've ever used. Speaker 2: You have the responsibility that you might do harm. This is not something for for the faint hearted. The cause of AIDS wasn't known at the time, but the fear was that perhaps there might be contamination of the vaccine with whatever caused AIDS. HIV was was sort Speaker 0: of hanging over this vaccine like a cloud even though he had proven clearly that HIV couldn't possibly survive the the treatments that he had subjected that vaccine to. Speaker 2: I separated into part two, a deep dive into science, to focus on this abbreviated vaccine timeline to quickly get to the ramifications of these new findings. The AIDS timeline. Speaker 3: We'll quickly review the well documented and never disputed events through May 1983 to set the stage for our two fiercely contested events, now resolved by the federal investigation. Speaker 2: Nineteen fifties. Speaker 1: The world's earliest confirmed HIV positive being is a chimpanzee used to develop hepatitis b vaccines. Speaker 2: Nineteen sixties. Speaker 1: Chimpanzees and New York heroin users are cross transfused with each other's raw blood to generate chimpanzee antigens to fight human hepatitis. Speaker 2: 1972. Speaker 1: Scientists at doctor Fauci's agency announced chimpanzee antigens protect humans from hepatitis b. The first patent is filed for a human vaccine made from chimpanzee antigens. Speaker 2: 1973. Speaker 1: The world's first recognized AIDS outbreak occurs among New York heroin users, the first group injected with chimpanzee plasma. Speaker 2: Nineteen seventy four. Speaker 1: Thirteen thousand. New York gay men are being recruited to test the vaccines. Speaker 2: Nineteen seventy five. Speaker 1: NYBC and Merck filed three patents, citing five vaccine examples all made from pure chimpanzee antigens. They patent a circular extraction method similar to dialysis to extract large amounts of antigens from chimpanzees for affordable mass vaccine production. Speaker 2: Nineteen seventy eight. Speaker 1: After years of testing on volunteers, nationwide placebo controlled trials begin on gay men with NYBC's New York trial and the CDC trials mainly in California The first HIV positive blood samples are found in gay men, All were collected from the cohort. All were the never before seen subtype b that sparked the global AIDS pandemic. Speaker 2: 1979. Speaker 1: In September, ten months into the trial, the scientist in charge wants to abort when an unexplainable, quote, flare up appears in precisely 11 participants who received the vaccine. He has warned aborting would irreparably harm the vaccine's reputation. Soon, the CDC will report unexplainable cases of Kaposi's sarcoma in gay men, noting that precisely eleven had experienced the initial flare up as of September 1979. By December, there are nineteen cases and the first death. This is now recognized as the onset of the world's second AIDS outbreak affecting the second group inoculated with chimpanzee plasma derived vaccines. Speaker 2: 1981 Speaker 1: A cancer researcher suggests that a new infectious agent with a fifty percent mortality rate may be causing the Kaposi sarcoma cases at vaccine trial sites He soon claims it was transmitted in the vaccine as rapid disease progression occurred exclusively in vaccine trial participants Trial scientists confirm his key claim reporting the incubation periods are quite different and longer in gay men who had not participated in the vaccine trial. In the next fifteen months, another five ninety three cases will emerge and forty one percent died. The same month Merck announces Heptavax B, a third US brand, this one for the domestic market. The original Merck HB Vax and NYBC B Vax will be offered only in overseas markets. Following compromises to get FDA approval, this new version is made exclusively from human blood. However, without the patented circular chimpanzee extraction method, it is quote too expensive for large scale use anywhere. Speaker 2: 1982. Speaker 1: The CDC names this disease AIDS in a bulletin, assuring the public the new FDA approved vaccine uses only human blood, distancing it from earlier vaccines. The WHO, in the last public mention of chimpanzee based vaccines, warns AIDS may be caused by a virus in the vaccine's plasma. Speaker 2: May 1983. Speaker 1: French scientists identify the causal virus, enabling testing of archived blood samples from trial participants In the end, it was a chimpanzee virus and the Kaposi's sarcoma lesions in early AIDS cases required simultaneous co infection with a second virus also found in those chimpanzees This discovery enables verifying what was at the time the sole and most obvious AIDS origin theory Namely verifying vaccine transmission by comparing HIV rates between men randomly given the hepatitis B vaccine versus a placebo during the clinical trials. Speaker 3: The next two events were the pivotal, fiercely contested claims in our chimp vax preprint, which have now been settled. Speaker 2: June 1983. Speaker 1: The two scientists at doctor Fauci's agency who developed the chimpanzee based vaccine assured world leaders it was a false alarm, claiming infection rates in the New York trial were similar between those who received the vaccine and the placebo. Allegedly in a personal communication from NYBC trial scientist Doctor Stevens Part two covers our numerous exchanges with NYBC scientists of that era following our outreach to Doctor Stevens The fact is doctor Fauci's scientists were spreading the most dangerous disinformation to defend their chimpanzee vaccine invention. All participants with AIDS had received the vaccine. Doctor Stevens later reported that nearly half the participants contracted HIV during the trial, but no one ever claimed similar rates among placebo recipients. Speaker 2: Nineteen eighty four. Speaker 1: The CDC claims rates did not differ in quote, men who did or did not receive hepatitis b vaccine in the vaccine trials conducted by CDC in Denver, Colorado and San Francisco, California. The CDC never released that internal private study. It sounds like they're saying they found rates did not differ in vaccine versus placebo, but the wording is ambiguous. Technically, the hundreds vaccinated before the trial also did not receive vaccine in the trial. So, technically, the CDC could have merely found rates were comparable in those vaccinated before and during the trial. Did the CDC find similar rates but use imprecise wording? Or did the ambiguous wording conceal a significant difference? The investigators went to incredible lengths to retrieve that withheld private study, including summoning data experts and scouring the mountain of physical archives. Nothing. It was wiped. Everyone who would have seen it claims ignorance. But our research concluded that it must have found that all or almost all of the participants who contracted HIV during the trial had received the vaccine We based this on the one and only public study the CDC commissioned to compare HIV rates in vaccine versus placebo years later when a book blamed AIDS on the vaccine. We argued the CDC designed the sole study which the public would see in a way that even if the vaccine transmitted HIV, it would appear to have prevented HIV. The reason is the CDC compared HIV rates in trial participants six years after the trial ended when HIV's sexual spread was at its peak diluting HIV contraction during the trial. However, the study only included participants who contracted hepatitis B during that time Since hepatitis B is up to 100 times more transmissible than HIV unvaccinated gay men almost always contracted it before HIV and would be counted even though they most likely contracted HIV after the trial In contrast, vaccinated participants would only be counted if they had a rare breakthrough hepatitis B infection In other words, the results should have shown much higher HIV rates in the unvaccinated creating the false impression that the vaccine offered protection against HIV However, it didn't work because gay men in the trial only contracted HIV during the trial After the trial, as HIV was spreading like wildfire in the gay community, there was almost no spread among trial participants because they were the lowest risk gay men who had no prior hepatitis exposure Their HIV rates went from zero percent to forty two percent during the trial and then remained steady. Therefore, six years after the trial, of the fourteen oh two trial participants, nearly all of whom were tested for HIV, only fourteen unvaccinated men had contracted HIV, a mere one percent. Since they likely contracted HIV as sexual transmission increased post trial, that means when the CDC made the ambiguous statement implying similar only a few, if any, unvaccinated placebo recipients were likely infected. That was the basis for our claim that the CDC's withheld private study must have shown that nearly all of the six hundred participants who contracted HIV during the trial had received the vaccine. The investigators sent our chart to many scientists including doctor Hadler himself along with our claim that despite effectively counting all HIV in the placebo group versus a portion of HIV in the vaccine group, HIV rates were still precisely dose dependent. Only nine percent in the placebo group climbing to forty two percent in the men who received all three doses. Nobody disputed the numbers. Nobody challenged our interpretation. Notably, nobody is claiming any of the CDC's private studies ever found HIV rates to be similar in vaccine and placebo. Despite the obvious significance, doctor Hadler conceded there was no investigation, and he never compared HIV rates except in this subset heavily skewed to exonerate the vaccine. He referred to San Francisco scientists who still have the full data. As shown in part two, those scientists had been deceived by Merck's manipulative language that led them to believe gay men in the trial had received the same human blood Heptovax as everyone else, not the overseas chimpanzee blood HB vax Unable to explain why only gay men became infected post vaccination, the trial scientists explained the extreme rationalizations they resorted to assuming either the vaccine was so effective that only the vaccinated were sexually active, while placebo recipients were ill with hepatitis, or possibly the vaccine temporarily lowered immune response. However, even if they didn't understand the vaccine's causal role, it was undisputed, and had there been a transparent public discourse, the truth would have come out before the chimpanzee based vaccines were given to millions of people in poor countries. The former head of AIDS epidemiology also wrote, quote, regarding issues such as testing vaccine for HIV, I'm almost certain that was done, and I expect that Merck would have records most relevant to that issue. Yet since the nineteen eighties, Merck has deflected demands for the test results by claiming it was the CDC that tested the vaccine. But the CDC study they cite merely confirmed HIV was inactivated in the new FDA approved human blood version. Speaker 3: Now consider the next two events from our timeline, and remember that before Africa's vaccine rollout began, only a few HIV cases existed in Africa confined to a single region. Speaker 2: 1984. Speaker 1: The vaccine's maker returned to the WHO at a symposium on Africa armed with the misinformation about similar rates in vaccine and placebo and a bulletin from a senior FDA official and former FDA official at Merck. It claimed AIDS was quote never documented to be transmitted by blood and was likely caused by gay party drugs like poppers, making it inevitable that cases of AIDS will occur in vaccine recipients unrelated to the vaccine itself. Later court filings revealed that one year before this FDA bulletin, the agency informed pharma executives that their blood derived products appeared to transmit the virus, but agreed to, quote, keep out of the public eye their continued overseas sales to avoid write off costs. Part two documents that has AIDS began to emerge in Africa one year after this symposium, the same FDA officials replaced references to the old chimpanzee based vaccines with the new FDA approved human blood Heptovax misleading a team of scientists who now hail chimpvax as the explanation for observed phenomena. Thanks to this FDA pharma public private partnership, the manufacturer was able to assert to the WHO that the old vaccines prohibition in Europe and The US was overly cautious and promoted it as a cost effective option for mass vaccination in Africa. He presented the same two lots shown to the WHO in 1977 along with a microscopic image he originally identified as residual viral material from chimpanzee plasma. But he has now adopted Merck's species ambiguous language for those original vaccines, calling it carrier plasma. Speaker 2: 1986. Speaker 1: Chimpanzee based vaccines are now, quote, widely used in poor countries, primarily for pregnant women and newborns. The WHO and CDC report that HIV only recently began spreading beyond its original Congo epicenter because initial infections were concentrated in newborns 12 old and women aged 16 to 29. Half of HIV positive infants had uninfected mothers but only in hospital settings, and half of HIV positive mothers had uninfected husbands. Many studies concurred that HIV's emergence in Africa was through recent medical injections, namely vaccinations. This led to an internal WHO report concluding ten million people were being infected with deadly diseases every year through medical injections causing a baby to die every twenty seconds. However, as the WHO's original vaccine transmission theory was believed ruled out, They assumed HIV spread through dirty needle reuse, expecting single use needles would quietly resolve the issue without alarming the public. Thus, the WHO suppressed their own findings to quote, not jeopardize their immunization program. We can see how well that worked since extensive blood samples had been archived across Sub Saharan Africa to track hepatitis rates pre vaccine. Retroactive testing showed all African countries except these were HIV free when the vaccine arrived. In The Congo, Africa's original epicenter, less than one percent had been infected after a century of alleged HIV spread Here are the rates when chimpanzee based vaccination ended fifteen years later with up to thirty two percent infected in those southern countries that began completely HIV free. Speaker 2: Some time ago, I started a group email with those scientists who sacrificed lucrative careers, some at the WHO and CDC, to raise the alarm about HIV spread in Africa from medical injections. And they were my productive critics, pointing out flaws, forcing me to rethink, do more research, constantly poking holes in my arguments, as you can see. And after many rounds of fixes, one called ChimpFacts, the quote, best account of probable HIV origins. So with that level of expert validation, I figured there'd be no problem getting Chimpfacts out. I mean, at least as an unreviewed preprint. Nope. Mainstream preprint servers still rejected it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

From the start, the hepatitis B vaccine was expensive—about $145 for three doses compared to $2 for other vaccines. Uptake was low among the high-risk groups it was meant for. So regulators shifted strategy: add it to the childhood schedule, where government funding guaranteed sales.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

By 1991, ACIP mandated hepatitis B vaccination for all newborns. By 1999, it expanded to all children and adolescents. Parents objected. Pediatricians resisted. Even gay activists called it a failure of public health outreach. But the CDC pressed forward—insisting it was “safe and effective” for day old newborn babies, despite what the science said.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Decades later, the outcome couldn’t be more clear. Acute hepatitis B cases declined—but chronic hepatitis B rates never budged. The very condition the program was supposed to eliminate hasn’t even changed since 1976. Severe injuries from the vaccine, however, skyrocketed. So was it worth it?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk For the first time in decades, the ACIP is actually doing its job and reconsidering the hepatitis B newborn mandate. This is our chance to demand change. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get

Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get the Dangerous Hepatitis B Vaccine? The suppressed history behind the Hep B vaccine and the actual risks and benefits of it we are never told about. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

This isn’t just about one vaccine. It’s about how “safe and effective” became a slogan. How risk-benefit ratios were buried. How the human cost was swept aside. And how bureaucrats forced a medical intervention on every newborn infant—not for health, but for control and profit.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk The hepatitis B saga is a warning. When government health policy is driven by politics and profit instead of evidence, children always become collateral damage. For decades, parents were never told the truth. Now, the cracks are showing.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

This is a once-in-a-lifetime chance to correct the terrible course we’ve been on. If you care about medical freedom, informed consent, and protecting children, now is the time to act. Read the full report. Spread the word. Contact your Senators. Watch the ACIP hearings. This could be the turning point. For 30 years, America’s newborns were sacrificed to a policy that never made sense. Will the ACIP finally end it?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every-newborn-forced-to-get

Why is Every Newborn Forced to Get the Dangerous Hepatitis B Vaccine? The suppressed history behind the Hep B vaccine and the actual risks and benefits of it we are never told about. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: What We’ve Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of?utm_source=publication-search

What We've Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data Numerous data sources now corroborate that the COVID vaccines shed in a consistent and replicable manner midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-dont-tell-you-about-c-sections

What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections Exploring the short and long term consequences of a frequently unnecessary procedure midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @HighWireTalk While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. --> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/hewugUUbzk

Saved - December 18, 2025 at 7:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recount how they arrived with guns after she refused the COVID shot. Dr. Aranda was stripped of her license, and she says many doctors don’t honor the Hippocratic Oath. She turned to natural healing, treating her husband with apricot seeds and enzymes, which helped him. Laetrile Case Histories profiles 62 cancer cases from the Richardson Clinic, updated in 2005, now discussed by John Richardson Jr. and Dr. Aranda.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

They showed up with guns—because she refused the COVID shot. Dr. Margaret Aranda was stripped of her medical license at gunpoint. But what she revealed next exposes a betrayal far darker than most people can imagine. She said most doctors never take the Hippocratic Oath—and some rewrite it to justify harm. After leaving the system behind, Dr. Aranda turned to natural healing. Her husband was battling bladder cancer, so she put him on a protocol based on apricot seeds and enzymes. He recovered. That experience led her deeper into a world the medical establishment doesn’t want you to see. One of the clearest windows into that world is Laetrile Case Histories—a book documenting the clinical experience of Dr. John A. Richardson, MD, who treated cancer patients in the 1970s using metabolic and nutritional therapies centered around Laetrile. Originally published in 1977, the book details 62 patient case studies—most of them people who came to the Richardson Clinic after exhausting every conventional option. Many had been given just days to live. Some went on to live for years—cancer-free. In 2005, co-author Patricia Griffin, RN BS, revisited those patients, followed up with their families, and updated the records to preserve what the system tried to erase. And now, joining us today to discuss what the establishment has fought to keep hidden about cancer for so long is John Richardson Jr. and Dr. Margaret Aranda (@TheRebelPatient). 🧵 THREAD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript introduces Laotryl case histories as a documentation of the clinical experiences of Dr. John A. Richardson, MD, who treated cancer patients at the Richardson Clinic in the 1970s using nutritional and metabolic therapies centered around Laotryl. The work was originally published in 1977 and comprises 62 detailed patient records, many of whom sought treatment after exhausting conventional medical options. In 2005, coauthor Patricia Griffin, RN, BS, undertook a thorough update of these records, reviewing patient families, outcomes, and long-term follow-ups to preserve historical accuracy and to provide context for Richardson’s original work. The described case studies are characterized as remarkable, with patients who were at times given only days to live reportedly going on to live long, fulfilled lives that were cancer-free. The discussion features the claim that the establishment has fought to keep hidden information about cancer, a point attributed to the investigative aim of the conversation. The participants named to discuss these themes are John Richardson and Dr. Margaret Aranda, who are presented as the figures discussing these assertions and the broader implications of the Laotryl-focused approach to cancer treatment. The summary emphasizes that the book and its updates offer detailed patient narratives that illustrate outcomes outside conventional cancer treatment trajectories, and it frames these narratives within a larger claim about suppression of alternative cancer knowledge by mainstream medical institutions. Overall, the material centers on: (1) the historical record of Laotryl-based nutritional/metabolic therapy in a 1970s cancer treatment program; (2) the expansion and clarifications provided by the 2005 update project led by Patricia Griffin to ensure accuracy and context; (3) the asserted extraordinary patient outcomes described in the 62 case studies; and (4) a provocative framing of ongoing tensions between alternative cancer treatment narratives and mainstream medical establishment perspectives, as discussed by John Richardson and Dr. Margaret Aranda. The tone suggests an emphasis on preserving and reevaluating historical patient experiences to challenge conventional treatment narratives and to highlight perceived hidden aspects of cancer treatment history.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Laotryl case histories documents the clinical experience of doctor John a Richardson, MD, who treated cancer patients at the Richardson clinic in the nineteen seventies using nutritional and metabolic therapies centered around Laotryl. Originally published in 1977, the book presents 62 detailed records of patients who often sought treatment after exhausting conventional options. In 2005, coauthor Patricia Griffin, RNBS, undertook the painstaking task of updating these records, reviewing patient families, outcomes, and long term follow ups to preserve historical accuracy and provide context for Richardson's original work. The case studies are amazing. People who were at times given just days to live going on to live long fulfilled lives cancer free. Joining us today to discuss what the establishment has fought to keep hidden about cancer for so long is John Richardson and doctor Margaret Aranda.
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 4:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read a leaked draft of a new AI executive order proposing the DOJ sue states that resist, overriding laws on child protections, deepfakes bans, and digital ID systems. I’m told AI will replace judges, teachers, and parents, tracking our every move, then use federal funds to crush dissenting states. It doesn’t feel like progress; it feels like the infrastructure of obedience quietly taking hold.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

EXCLUSIVE: You’re About to Wake Up in a Very Different Country | Daily Pulse What’s coming won’t feel like a war. But when it lands, you’ll realize everything familiar is gone. A leaked draft of the new AI executive order reveals a sweeping plan to override state laws—using the DOJ to sue any state that dares to resist. That includes laws protecting children, banning deepfakes, or blocking digital ID systems. You’re already living inside the digital prison. Most just haven’t noticed the walls going up. AI is replacing judges, teachers, and even parents—while tracking everything you do. And now, they’re preparing to use federal funding to crush any state that pushes back. This isn’t progress. It’s the infrastructure of obedience—and it’s quietly locking into place. 🧵 THREAD

Saved - December 3, 2025 at 10:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explain why Hepatitis B is mandated for school entry in 46 states, yet newborns get it on day one, despite transmission routes. I reveal the real reason behind this policy and why it could be changing.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Hepatitis B vaccine is mandated for children to attend public schools in 46 states. Hepatitis B is transmitted via needles or sexual contact, yet this vaccine is pushed on babies on their first day of life. Why? We finally have some answers. Here’s the real reason every newborn is forced to get it—and why that could finally be changing. 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: A child born in a hospital in The United States today, within an hours of coming from source into this body, the first thing that happens to them is pharmaceutical intervention without really asking, barely informed consent. That child's eyes are smeared with erythromycin ointment, and they're given a hepatitis B vaccine in their first day of life. And the hep B vaccine is for hepatitis B, which is a sexually transmitted disease, an IV drug user disease, of course, which babies are not gonna be exposed to, and yet every single baby in America is getting the intervention. So from the literally the day we are born, we're— Speaker 1: I these mean, why not test the pregnant mother for those? Speaker 0: They do. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: So They give it to the women who even if they have tested negative— Speaker 1: they give majority. Absolutely. So I don't understand why would you treat a child on his first day of life for illnesses you know for a fact he doesn't have, it isn't gonna get? Speaker 2: So a child's born let's just take the sign. The child's born. Hep B is spread by two routes, sexually transmitted disease or intravenous needles. So my one day old isn't going to be having sex or doing heroin right away. So what's the purpose of getting this on the schedule in the first day of life, the first hours of life? Speaker 0: And if you push, and I welcome anyone to do this with their doctor, you get to two things. You get to the American patients are too stupid to remember, so we need to do it right away. That's literally like what they say. And then my doctor told me that that a child at daycare could trip over a needle that has hepatitis B on it. That's literally what they get to. Speaker 2: That a needle could be on the playground that somebody just did heroin or something, threw the needle down, and it has hepatitis B blood on it. I asked the doctor, has there ever been in human history a case of hepatitis B two being transferred that way? They said no. It's only through intravenous needles and sex. So you actually to to just to steel man this, and, again, welcome anyone to respond, there is not actually a scenario absent of intravenous needles or sex, that a person gets hepatitis b. Speaker 0: There is not a reason for this to be given.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A child born in a hospital in The United States today within an hours of coming from source into this, you know, into this body, the first thing that happens to them is pharmaceutical intervention without really asking you know, I mean, there was barely informed consent about this. That child's eyes are smeared with erythromycin ointment, and they're given a hepatitis B vaccine in their first day of life. And the hep B vaccine is for hepatitis B, which is a sexually transmitted disease, an IV drug user disease, of course, which babies are not gonna be exposed to, and yet every single baby in America is getting the intervention. So from the literally the day we are born, we're Speaker 1: I these mean, why not test the pregnant mother for those? Speaker 0: They do. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: So They give it to the women who even if they have tested negative, Speaker 1: they give majority. Absolutely. So I don't understand why would you treat a child on his first day of life for illnesses you know for a fact he doesn't have, it isn't gonna get? Speaker 2: So a child's born let's just take the sign. The child's born. Hep b is spread by two routes, sexually transmitted disease or intravenous needles. So my one day old isn't going to be having sex or doing heroin right away. So what's the purpose of getting this on the schedule in the first day of life, the first hours of life? And if you push, and I welcome anyone to do this with their doctor, you get to two things. You get to the American patients are too stupid to remember, so we need to do it right away. That's literally like what they say. And then my doctor told me that that a child at daycare could trip over a needle that has hepatitis B on it. That's literally what they get to. That a needle could be on the playground that somebody just did heroin or something, threw the needle down, and it has hepatitis B blood on it. I asked the doctor, has there ever been in human history a case of hepatitis B two being transferred that way? They said no. It's only through intravenous needles and sex. So you actually to to just to steel man this, and, again, welcome anyone to respond, there is not actually a scenario absent of intravenous needles or sex, that a person gets hepatitis b. There is not a reason for this to be given.
Saved - November 19, 2025 at 10:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m sharing stories that span fear, politics, and defense gear: a troubling claim that all vaccinated participants show amyloid microclots tied to Long Covid, plus a spike in embalmers’ reports; a cancer-focused video touting natural detox and an affiliate disclosure; discussion of Epstein file declassification and national security, with backlash; Faraday bags and EMF shielding ads; a GOP claim linking Orthodox Christians to Russian intelligence; a tax-advantaged metals IRA loophole; and a show sign-off.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

DISTURBING: A new peer-reviewed study has quietly uncovered one of the most alarming biological findings of the pandemic era, revealing that 100% of COVID vaccinated participants had amyloid microclots circulating in their blood. Even more unsettling, these microclots match the same pathology as the large white fibrous clots embalmers have been pulling from bodies worldwide since 2021. In a cohort that was 94% vaccinated, researchers found that every participant, including all “healthy controls,” carried fibrinolysis-resistant, ThT-positive amyloid microclots. The authors didn’t acknowledge the obvious, but their own data makes it unavoidable. The condition labeled “Long COVID” appears almost entirely in vaccinated individuals without any lab verification of prior infection, indicating the study is tracking Long Vaccine pathology, not post-viral illness. Their experiments show that purified spike protein alone produces these amyloid structures, offering a direct mechanism for the fibrous clots embalmers continue to report. With rising infant deaths and widespread microclotting now appearing in state-level embalmer surveys, the implications are global. What else are we about to discover? Don’t miss @zeee_media's explosive report. Watch the full report: 👇 https://rumble.com/v71wvtk-100-of-covid-injected-have-microclots-republicans-vs.-christianity-daily-pu.html

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: Concerned about cancer but frustrated with the “wait and see” approach? Join Drs. Ealy, Ardis, Schmidt, and more in this powerful video replay event, where you’ll learn natural, evidence-based ways to target the root causes of cancer. https://www.myehialoha.org/product/healing-for-the-ages-2024-replay-cleansing-the-causes-of-cancer/#a_aid=VFOX Discover practical cleansing protocols that help your body eliminate cancer-causing toxins, boost your immune system, and put you back in control of your health. Use code VFOX to save 30% today. DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.

Cleansing the Causes of Cancer | AGES '24 Replay AGES Replays '24 | Cleansing the Causes of Cancer! Cleanse your body of the causes of cancer and unlock natural wellness secrets that put you in control of your health journey. myehialoha.org

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

In other news, Speaker Mike Johnson is already preparing Americans for the possibility that they’ll never see the Epstein files released in full, insisting that unredacted disclosure would endanger national security and expose intelligence agencies. Critics argue that this is the same excuse used for decades to shield powerful people, and Johnson’s warning feels less like genuine caution and more like laying the groundwork for a cover-up. In his briefing, he claimed the DOJ “can’t” declassify material created by intelligence agencies and called it “dangerous” to force disclosure. His comment triggered immediate backlash from those who say the intelligence ties are precisely why the files must be released, not buried. Outrage grew when Johnson revealed he had already brought in Senator John Thune to stall the process in the Senate. Even Benny Johnson, usually supportive of GOP leadership, said he’s “sick of it,” warning that the public will not accept another political shield around the Epstein network. With every delay, the same question keeps getting louder: Who are they protecting? Watch the full report: 👇 https://rumble.com/v71wvtk-100-of-covid-injected-have-microclots-republicans-vs.-christianity-daily-pu.html

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: Want protection from surveillance, hacking, and even electromagnetic threats? The elite Faraday bags at escapezone.com/pulse block GPS, Bluetooth, RFID skimming, and EMF—perfect for phones, laptops, wallets, and more. Their premium ballistic backpack even combines Faraday shielding with Kevlar armor, giving you the upper hand in an unpredictable world. Want to shield your body, too? Try their EMF-blocking beanies and blankets. Whether it’s for you, your family, or someone you love—don’t leave it to chance. Shop now at escapezone.com/pulse and protect what matters most. DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Our last story tonight is one that many Americans never thought they’d see: a sitting Republican suggesting Orthodox Christians in the United States could be tied to a foreign intelligence operation. That charge, pushed by Rep. Joe Wilson and echoed by outlets like The Hill, is now raising serious alarms for anyone who cares about religious liberty and the dangerous precedent it may set. Wilson claimed the Russian Orthodox Church is an “extension of the Russian state,” then implied that U.S. Orthodox communities in communion with Moscow could be used for intelligence work. Special guest @Jay_D007 says this is simply a collapsed Russiagate narrative being revived at a moment when Orthodoxy is growing fast across the country. He adds that while the Cold War saw real KGB infiltration, today’s accusations ignore the documented persecution of Orthodox Christians in Ukraine, funded by U.S. policymakers. To Dyer, this selective suspicion shows how out of touch leaders have become, and how easily outdated propaganda can be turned against peaceful believers. If questioning Christians is now “acceptable,” what comes next, and who ends up in the crosshairs? Watch the full report: 👇 https://rumble.com/v71wvtk-100-of-covid-injected-have-microclots-republicans-vs.-christianity-daily-pu.html

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: Did you know the tax code allows precious metals to be held in retirement accounts WITHOUT triggering immediate taxes? It’s a real IRS provision that top investors use to grow their wealth, but now you can use this secret loophole, too: http://dailypulsegold.com 👈 Genesis Gold Group is revealing how this IRS-approved strategy works and how it could help safeguard your savings as the dollar keeps losing value. Don’t invest blindly. Learn how the system really works and use the same advantages top investors do. Get your free IRS loophole guidebook at http://dailypulsegold.com.

IRS Loophole Report – Secured My Wealth genesisgold.securedmywealth.com
IRS Loophole Report – Secured My Wealth genesisgold.securedmywealth.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks for tuning in. Follow us (@Zeee_Media and @VigilantFox) for stories that matter—stories the media doesn’t want you to see. We’ll be back with another show tomorrow. See you then. Watch the full episode: 👇 https://rumble.com/v71wvtk-100-of-covid-injected-have-microclots-republicans-vs.-christianity-daily-pu.html

Saved - November 18, 2025 at 6:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I trace how UV blood irradiation cured sepsis and other infections in the 1940s, how the AMA allegedly rigged a study to bury it, and how sunlight is portrayed as dangerous despite evidence of its healing power. I note Sweden’s finding that avoiding sun increases mortality, the rise of UVBI/LBI abroad, and ongoing calls to reconsider light-based therapies the medical establishment has sidelined.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

They buried a cure for deadly infections. In the 1940s, UV blood irradiation was curing sepsis, pneumonia, and even polio. But the American Medical Association rigged a study to kill it, ensuring this life-saving therapy vanished. Decades later, Trump curiously suggested putting light inside the body to treat COVID. The media mocked him with bleach jokes. But he may have unknowingly referenced a powerful light-based therapy with proven results. 🧵

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Sunlight isn't the enemy. And the campaign against it is a lie. @MidwesternDoc's report uncovers the shocking truth: almost everything you’ve been told about sunlight is wrong—and it’s costing us our health. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-century-of-evidence-putting-light

The Century of Evidence Putting Light Inside the Body Is A Miraculous Therapy How Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation treats severe many severe Cardiovascular, Infectious, Obstetric, Autoimmune and Neurological Diseases midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc In the 1980s, dermatologists launched a PR blitz blaming sunlight for cancer. Why? To push expensive skin cancer treatments. And I’m sure the skincare industry has enjoyed the fruits of the sunlight scare as well.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc A massive 20-year study in Sweden revealed that women who avoided sunlight were 130% more likely to die. Those same women were also more likely to develop things like cancer. Read that part again. The women who avoided sunlight were more likely to develop cancer.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc It’s true. Most skin cancer deaths are due to a lack of sunlight. Check out this deep dive from @MidwesternDoc. It will make you rethink everything you’ve been told about sunlight. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dermatologys-disastrous-war-against

Dermatology's Disastrous War Against The Sun The forgotten side of skin health and the necessity of sunlight midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

It turns out, natural light heals us. And a lack of it destroys more than you might think. Sunlight regulates everything—from immune function to mental health. It plays a pivotal role in: • Cancer and Infections • Circulation • Behavioral disorders • Animal health, fertility, and agricultural productivity • Regulating growth cycles and the circadian rhythm

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc You’ve been lied to about the sun. @MidwesternDoc's report exposes how modern medicine turned sunlight into a scapegoat — and why avoiding it may be making us sicker, not safer. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dermatologys-disastrous-war-against

Dermatology's Disastrous War Against The Sun The forgotten side of skin health and the necessity of sunlight midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Did you know your eyes are your main light receptors? If you regularly wear glasses or contacts, you might be unknowingly starving your body of light. And that’s on top of the fact that most people spend their days indoors, away from light. Standard glass—from windows to glasses—blocks healing UV from reaching us.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Knowledge of the healing power of light isn’t new. One of the oldest proven therapies in medicine is… sunlight! https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-century-of-evidence-putting-light

The Century of Evidence Putting Light Inside the Body Is A Miraculous Therapy How Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation treats severe many severe Cardiovascular, Infectious, Obstetric, Autoimmune and Neurological Diseases midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Following the development of various sanitizing UV devices, something incredible happened. In 1928, Emmett Knott accidentally discovered that irradiating a small amount of blood with UV light could save dying animals. By 1933, his method saved a human who was dying from septicemia. It went on to treat thousands with nearly miraculous results.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

By the 1940s, ultraviolet blood irradiation—or UVBI—was curing sepsis, pneumonia, polio, hepatitis, and more—even when antibiotics failed. And by the early 1950s, it was being used in around 50 hospitals in the U.S. and doctors published 50 papers involving 3,000+ patients with unbelievable success stories. Even The New York Times and Time Magazine covered it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

And then came the American Medical Association. They offered to validate the therapy if Knott handed over the rights. He refused. So they rigged a study to fail and declared UVBI useless, despite their own data showing it worked. Despite having seen the success of UVBI firsthand, hospitals dropped it overnight.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

And yet, the results couldn’t be denied. • Patients on the verge of death recovered. • Severe pain vanished. • Vital signs normalized. • Autoimmune flare-ups disappeared. • Sepsis reversed in hours. Sepsis! And all of this happens rapidly, something hardly ever seen in today’s critical care medicine.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Because the evidence is overwhelming, Germany, Russia, and others adopted it—and never looked back. UVBI was also modified into Laser Blood Irradiation (LBI), which puts light directly into the bloodstream via catheter or laser patch. Both showed similar benefits.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The data is staggering. • 103 acute infections: 92% success rate • Tuberculosis: 100% cured in 3 months (vs. 59% with antibiotics alone) • Severe pneumonia in infants: Recovery 1.7 times faster • Hepatitis: Viral load dropped up to 45% with 3 UVBI sessions • COVID-19: UVBI reduced hospital stays, prevented death, and healed lungs And there were zero serious side effects. Why isn’t UVBI routinely administered?!

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

And UVBI doesn’t just fight infections. It transforms chronic disease. It has been shown to improve: • Autoimmune diseases • Circulatory issues • Chronic pain • Depression, migraines, insomnia • Fertility and pregnancy outcomes • Post-surgical recovery It even helped MS patients when cerebrospinal fluid was irradiated. Wow!

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Here are some real stories: One man could barely walk around a mall. After 2 UVBI sessions, he walked 2+ miles in the cold with zero pain. Another trial cured 79% of severe pelvic infections. 17 women who had been infertile all became pregnant post-treatment! Sign me up!

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

So, how does it work? UVBI irradiates a small amount of blood—just 40–60ml. That blood then reenters your body and triggers full-body healing. Scientists believe blood conducts light via hemoglobin. Within minutes, oxygenation improves, pain fades, and the immune system reboots. Incredible.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc So… Why don’t we have easy access to this today? Take a wild guess. It’s cheap. It’s effective. And it doesn’t make Big Pharma billions. Just like ivermectin, vitamin C, DMSO, and other suppressed treatments—UVBI was blacklisted because it threatened the status quo.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Remember when Trump mentioned putting light “inside the body” to fight COVID? The media twisted it into a bleach joke—but he was unknowingly referring to something very real. UVBI had already been used successfully to treat COVID abroad. And again, the idea isn’t new.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Public awareness is now rising. Joe Rogan and Jimmy Dore both talked about UVBI. Alternative clinics quietly use it. And researchers have compiled over 200 published studies on UVBI and LBI—with consistent, shocking success. The truth is coming out. And we’re here for it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Sunlight is medicine. UVBI could have saved millions—if it weren’t buried by greed. But that’s changing. More people are waking up and realizing the tools to heal have been hidden in plain sight.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-century-of-evidence-putting-light

The Century of Evidence Putting Light Inside the Body Is A Miraculous Therapy How Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation treats severe many severe Cardiovascular, Infectious, Obstetric, Autoimmune and Neurological Diseases midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-cancer-cure-hiding

The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight How DMSO turns a common dye into a highly potent cancer treatment that's harmless to normal tissue midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc DMSO is a Miraculous Therapy for Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Injuries https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-is-a-miraculous-therapy-for

DMSO is a Miraculous Therapy for Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Injuries The decades of evidence DMSO revolutionizes the practice of medicine midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. --> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/Tp68K4IVaj

Saved - November 11, 2025 at 12:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report Tucker Carlson expressing horror as Dane Wigington claims seven sprayed substances—aluminum, barium, strontium, manganese, surfactants, polymer fibers, graphene—are being released, with DoD and DARPA named as coordinators. Wigington dismisses condensation as a lie, arguing high-bypass turbofan engines nearly avoid producing condensation. Post 2 outlines a full interview transcript, covering who’s behind it, government positions, weather control, and related topics.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Tucker Carlson horrified as geoengineering expert Dane Wigington identifies what’s really being sprayed in the skies. Hint: it’s not just condensation. Dane Wigington named seven troubling substances: 1.) Aluminum 2.) Barium 3.) Strontium 4.) Manganese 5.) Surfactants 6.) Polymer fibers 7.) Graphene Tucker asked who the heck is doing this, and Wigington replied: “All roads lead to those who print the money,” naming DoD and DARPA as “coordinating entities.” Responding to the condensation trail narrative, which Wigington called “one of the greatest lies ever perpetrated on populations all over the world,” he pointed out an inconvenient fact that refutes that claim: “All military tankers and all commercial aircraft are equipped with what’s known as a high-bypass turbofan jet engine. That’s a jet-powered fan. Ninety percent of the air that moves through that engine is not combusted. So by design, that engine is NEARLY INCAPABLE of producing any condensation material except under rare and extreme circumstances.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker lists a range of substances—aluminum, barium, strontium, manganese, surfactants, polymer fibers, graphene—as elements allegedly present in breathable air, describing the situation as horrifying and implying widespread dispersion linked to coordinated programs. They claim that, ultimately, all roads lead to those who print the money, and assert that the coordinating entities behind these programs include the Department of Defense (DOD) and DARPA. The speaker states that there are documents proving the existence of these programs, including an 800-page United States Senate document from 1978 that outlines the scope and scale of the programs and calls for intergovernmental cooperation even between otherwise adversarial nations because of the cross-border ramifications of these programs. Regarding which country is the biggest player, the speaker identifies the United States of America, citing the size of the U.S. military. They claim the U.S. military has three times more aerial tankers—described as the primary aircraft used in these operations—than all other militaries in the world combined. The speaker then revisits the condensation trail narrative, labeling it as perhaps one of the greatest lies ever perpetrated on populations worldwide. They argue that all military tankers and all commercial aircraft are equipped with high bypass turbofan jet engines, defined as jet-powered fans, and that 90% of the air moving through those engines is not combusted. By design, the speaker says, this makes the engine nearly incapable of producing condensation trails except under rare and extreme circumstances, and those circumstances are diminishing each day due to warming in the troposphere. The speaker mentions that two former military pilots who fly private aircraft—described as important people—have contacted GongWatch.org. In both cases, these individuals were off the coast of the Pacific Northwest when their aircraft were forced into emergency auto descents because the outside air was 45 to 50 degrees above what it should have been. The air, according to the speaker, was not dense enough to carry those aircraft. The people who contacted GongWatch.org are described as very alarmed but very afraid to speak out.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have aluminum, barium, strontium, manganese, surfactants, polymer fibers, graphene, all of this coming down in our breathable air call, Tucker. That's horrifying. So who's doing this specifically? Ultimately, all roads lead to those who print the money, but we know as far as the coordinating entities, certainly DOD, DARPA, and we have documents to prove the existence of these programs going back decades, documents hundreds of pages long. We have an 800 page US senate document from 1978 outlining the scope and scale of these programs then, specifically calling for intergovernmental cooperation even between, quote, otherwise adversarial nations, because of the cross border ramifications of these programs. You can't just geo engineer of your own country. Who's the biggest player? Obviously The United States Of America, because of the size of our military. We have the US military has three times more aerial tankers, which are the primary aircraft used in these operations, three times more than all other militaries in the world combined. And if I could back up to the whole condensation trail narrative again, which is perhaps one of the greatest lies ever perpetrated on populations all over the world, all military tankers and all commercial aircraft are equipped with what's known as a high bypass turbofan jet engine. That's a jet powered fan. 90% of the air that moves through that engine is not combusted. So by design, that engine is nearly incapable of producing any condensation trail except under rare and extreme circumstances, which are diminishing by the day because of the warming that's occurring in the troposphere. So much warming. We've had two former military pilots that fly private aircraft, important people have contacted us at gongwatch dot org. In both cases, they were off the coast of the Pacific Northwest and their aircraft were forced into emergency auto descents because the air outside that aircraft was 45 to 50 degrees above what it should have been. The air was not dense enough to carry those aircraft. These people are very, very alarmed, but very afraid to speak out.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Full Interview: https://t.co/T4YHOWzyDJ

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

The government has finally admitted that chemtrails are real. It’s called geoengineering and it’s far worse than anything you imagined. Dane Wigington explains. (0:00) Introduction (1:32) Are All These Strange Streaks in the Sky Chemicals Being Released Into the Air? (12:26) Who Is Behind This? (16:09) What Is the Government's Position on Climate Engineering? (23:42) Weather Control and Operation Popeye (31:47) The US Military's Role in Climate Engineering (37:14) Why Is Wigington So Dedicated to This Research? (39:05) The Mass Death of Insects and Trees Around the Globe (44:56) The Government's Biological Warfare Tests on Unknowing Americans (48:01) Wigington's Meeting With Gavin Newsom (50:28) Is the Government Using Wildfires as a Climate Engineering Weapon? (52:41) Has Congress Ever Attempted to Pass Legislation to Fight This? (57:06) Is Climate Engineering Impacting Earth's Animal Population? (1:00:30) Where Can People Learn More? Includes paid partnerships.

Saved - November 6, 2025 at 11:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I present a narrative asserting nebulized DMSO can reverse COPD and other lung ailments, with Daniel’s rapid strides and dozens of testimonials as proof. It highlights glutathione, “umbrella therapy,” and international studies, while accusing the FDA and Big Pharma of suppressing a cheap, effective cure. The posts claim DMSO heals infections, asthma, CF, ARDS, and more, urging readers to consult @MidwesternDoc for evidence and access.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

This compound is doing what inhalers, oxygen tanks, and steroids never could. It’s curing the “incurable” and helping people with COPD breathe again. Daniel (74), a man with severe COPD, said he was “ready to die.” But something remarkable happened when he started taking a nebulized DMSO solution his neighbor prepared for him. What is DMSO? It’s a natural compound derived from tree pulp, with a remarkable ability to restore breathing, reduce inflammation, and heal damaged lungs. In just two weeks of use, Daniel was breathing so well he could finally talk in complete sentences again without gasping for air. If Daniel’s recovery surprised you, just wait until you read what happened to the 85-year-old man with emphysema. 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
Daniel Stringfellow, 74, lives next to his neighbor Rebecca Cunningham and has stage three COPD. His symptoms include laboring to breathe during even small tasks, such as walking 40 feet to his truck, getting dressed, or carrying groceries. He explains that he must stop halfway to catch his breath, which drains his motivation and leads to depression because he can’t do things he used to do. He previously used a nebulizer prescribed by his pulmonologist as a first-line treatment and was given inhalers like Trilogy and albuterol, but he says the nebulizer “doesn’t work for me” and there’s no noticeable difference after more than a year of use. He still uses Trilogy but is unsure it provided significant improvement. Rebecca, his neighbor, has been researching DMSO and provided Daniel with a solution to put in his nebulizer. He notes that Rebecca asked for the paperwork to understand the amounts used in the nebulizer. He was ready to try anything and began using the DMSO solution about two and a half weeks ago. Within three days to two weeks, he reports a “big difference” and describes it as “unbelievable.” He says people who know him say his color was bad before, but now he can breathe better, talk without losing his breath, and perform tasks he hadn’t been able to do in a long time. He mentions carrying groceries from his Jeep to his house and RV, which he hasn’t done in a long time, and that he used to labor to get dressed in the morning. Daniel expects a future CT scan and plans to see his pulmonologist afterward. He notes that before starting the DMSO, all CT scans had shown no improvement and that he had been stopped at stage three. With DMSO, he anticipates improvement reflected in the CT results. He emphasizes that he has nothing to gain by this and that COPD is not pretty, describing nights when he wondered why he would wake up the next morning. He urges others to “just do it” and asserts that if it doesn’t help, they have nothing to lose. Speaker 1 (off-camera) adds that Daniel’s ability to sit and talk for length of time is miraculous compared to before, and recalls how difficult it was for Daniel to answer questions, needing rest between responses. She notes the emotional toll of the disease, the times of feeling ready to die, and her commitment to support him. She references reading Midwestern Doctor articles on DMSO and related research, and she confirms that the DMSO is working and wants viewers to witness the transformation. She says Daniel now has color in his face and credits the neighbor’s efforts and the DMSO for the improvement. The conversation ends with expressions of gratitude and a hope for continued progress.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Daniel Stringfellow. I'm 74 at the August, and I live next door to my neighbor, Rebecca Cunningham. I've got stage three COPD. My symptoms are labor of breathing, doing any kind of small task, walking to my truck, even putting my clothes on in the morning. It's it's it's just even any any small task. I labor at breathing which is like working to just to breathe which I hate. I made some notes because I wanna cover everything. And so with that, like walking to my truck 40 feet, I have to stop halfway and catch my breath and that's just carrying me, nothing else. So, you know, you don't have, I don't have any motivation to do anything when when my was like that. Have no willpower and then, after a while, depression sets in because you you you can't do things you used to and you get tired of trying to breathe and so, on my stage one, they gave me a nebulizer. I think that must be their first rule of thumb, these pulmonologist. It's this stuff here. It's in a box. It says you do it four times a day. I'm sure if you all have it, these little things here And you I try I've been use I I've tried using that for over a year. It doesn't work for me. I could no notice no difference. I might as well just be putting water in it. So I quit using it. Okay. Now, of course, you know, they're gonna give you some inhalers too, like, oh, you know, Trilogy, maybe your out of albuterol emergencies, I I I still use the Trilogy, but I don't know. I I don't I don't can't see it was significant improvement. Okay. Well, Rebecca, my neighbor, mentions this about this DMSO. Okay? She's been researching it and she asked me for the paperwork. These nebulizers, I guess, to see what amount goes in the nebulizer. I don't know. You'll have to ask her about that. And so, you know, at that point, I'm ready to try anything and so, Rebecca gives me a solution to put in my nebulizer. And good lord, I think in third, I don't know if it's, it was yesterday, Saturday. Has it been two weeks or three? Speaker 1: Yeah, two weeks, I took. Two weeks. Yeah. Speaker 0: In three days, I noticed a big difference. Unbelievable. Everyone I know says my color is bad. I'm breathing and I I could talk without losing my breath. And and I I can do I've done things that I haven't been able to do in a long time. I carried my groceries from my Jeep to my house, RV, whatever. And I've never had them in a long time. I I you know, it's just it was in my, I really, I used to labor to get dressed in the morning. It take me a while. And that, there's no life. Yeah, I I mean, the improvements, if they're gonna work on me, they'll work on anyone. They have to have COPD. I just I just can't believe it. I'm blessed to have a neighbor that thinks of me, that cares. So I have a future CT scan coming because all the other CT scans I've had up until I started doing the DMSO. There wasn't any improvement. So that soon appears they've stopped me at stage three. I don't wanna get any worse. But with what she gave me, I'm getting a lot better. So I don't know. And then I I'll I'll go see my pulmonologist, after the CT scan. So I know there's gonna be improvement when they see the CT scan. There's gotta be a lot of improvement. So, you know, I have nothing to gain by this. I just know what it's like to have COPD, and you know it's not pretty at all. It just feels like sometimes I'd go to bed. I didn't I don't even know why I wake up the next morning. So y'all all yeah. Got nothing to lose. You sure won't kill you, but if you don't, I'm a think you you are gonna die. So listen. Just just do it. That's that's about all I got to say that I think Speaker 1: Well, I know I'll I'm I'm off camera back here, y'all. I will add a little bit Yes. That just the fact that you're able to sit here and talk about this at the length of time that you have been talking is miraculous compared to how you were. Speaker 0: I agree. Speaker 1: You know, just Speaker 0: I wouldn't be able Speaker 1: to meet you and to mean, it had gotten to the point where I I timed my questions. I knew you needed to sit down and rest a minute if I needed to come talk to you about anything because you needed that time. And even then, most of your answers would be two or three words, and then you'd have to catch your breath a while and then come back. And just being able to talk to you again and have you talked to me is awesome. Speaker 0: It is awesome. It's it's just I I I can clean my house. I just man, it's just unbelievable. It's great. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: Wow. It's Speaker 1: And I I know I I have seen the the depressed side too. Speaker 0: Have been Speaker 1: a few times where you had said, you know, you're just ready to die. And I was and in me, I'm going, no. I'm not ready to give you up yet. Well, you gotta just cut that shit out because I'm keeping you. Speaker 0: Well, you you figures they figure out something good. You you ought to be a doctor. So Speaker 1: Well Anyway, we'll we'll Speaker 0: we'll Rebecca will give you the results of my CT scan and my visit with pulmonologist because and and in that way because I I I know I wanna prove to y'all and to myself that this this is the only stuff that's ever worked for me. So I urge you to to do it. Yeah. Listen to her because she she's the one that came up with it and mixed it, everything. Speaker 1: So Well, I I read the articles that Midwestern Doctor wrote. And he because he has gone in very much in-depth into a lot of the things that DMSO can do, as well as some other medications that he's really researched. But lately he's been researching the DMSO, and I, lately I've been reading all those articles and a lot of the medical studies too. And if I hadn't noticed that, I mean Speaker 0: Yeah. I would I would still be in misery. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: I'd still be living in it's a miserable life, y'all. If you got COPD, especially stage three, then you'll you'll know what I'm talking about. You really will. It sucks. Yeah. Well, anyway Yeah. Y'all have a blessed rest of the day. Okay? I am. I might even start exercising. I'm leading up to that, y'all. Speaker 1: I'll I'll pull you into it. Next thing you know, you'll be walking up Mount Baldy in Speaker 0: the middle Speaker 1: of the morning. Speaker 0: Oh, wow. This don't get carried away. Speaker 1: So this is me. I'm the one behind the camera, and I'm not dressed for it or anything. I've been tearing my son's my grandson's bicycle apart to rebuild it. But I just that post on x picked up so much traction. I just I wanted y'all to see the person. And for you to be able to see that he has color in his face because he didn't before. He's a treasure, and we all have those in our lives. And I've lost a few treasures lately, and I didn't want to lose him too. And the DMSO is working. It's really working. And I wanted y'all to witness that. So thank you.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-heals-the-lungs-and-cures-chronic-35a

DMSO Heals the Lungs and Cures Chronic Respiratory Diseases How DMSO treats Asthma, COPD, Pneumonia, ARDS and Pulmonary Fibrosis midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The lungs naturally coat themselves with an antioxidant called glutathione that protects against damage. When someone has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), that coating vanishes. Studies show that nebulized glutathione can slow or reverse COPD—without side effects. Sounds easy enough, but it’s not widely used. You’re probably wondering why more doctors aren’t using it. It’s simple and it’s a story we’ve heard before. Glutathione is not profitable.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The U.S. spent $24 BILLION on COPD in 2023 alone. And asthma costs another $40 billion a year. These are “forever patients” for Big Pharma. The current system isn’t designed to cure them—it’s designed to barely keep them alive, keep them dependent, and milk them for every last penny they’ve got. It sounds more like extortion than health care.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Once considered a miracle compound, DMSO has shown to heal inflammation, restore blood flow, reverse tissue damage—even rescue dying nerves. Over the years, its use has spanned everything from paralysis to pancreatitis. And over time, it was discovered to help the lungs, too.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

DMSO is what's called an “umbrella therapy”—it treats dozens of diseases and other ailments by targeting the root causes: inflammation, oxidative damage, poor circulation, etc. DMSO is safe, inexpensive, and shockingly effective. A little too effective, in fact. So the FDA did what the FDA does… and buried it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

When DMSO hit the mainstream in the 1960s, Americans rightly flocked to it. Pain vanished in minutes. Chronic disease symptoms faded. Real healing began. But pharmaceutical giants saw the writing on the wall—DMSO was a threat to their profits and their very existence. So they got the FDA to pull the plug. Research was shut down overnight. DMSO disappeared and eventually faded from memory.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks to the 1994 Dietary Supplement Health & Education Act, the FDA can no longer regulate natural medicines. But the damage to DMSO was done. It fell into obscurity. Until now. @MidwesternDoc is reviving DMSO’s reputation. Check it out: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-heals-the-lungs-and-cures-chronic-35a

DMSO Heals the Lungs and Cures Chronic Respiratory Diseases How DMSO treats Asthma, COPD, Pneumonia, ARDS and Pulmonary Fibrosis midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The testimonials are now flooding in. Hundreds of people are sharing their DMSO success stories. People using DMSO for pain were suddenly breathing better. Their COPD improved. Asthma symptoms vanished. Oxygen tanks abruptly went unused. Some people even reversed their pulmonary fibrosis. And it’s not a fluke. The results are consistent—all over the world.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

If you’re not familiar with COPD, what you really must understand is just how life altering and debilitating it can be. How people struggle to do the things that most of us take for granted—like walking to the mailbox and even getting dressed in the morning. These people are regularly met with dead ends and little support. They suffer until they die. Watch this video testimonial from Daniel who has been struggling with stage three COPD. Like many other COPD patients, Daniel was ready to die. He describes his loss of willpower, the mounting depression he experienced, and the unhelpful “treatments” he was given at each stage of the disease. When Daniel had nothing left to lose, his neighbor suggested he nebulize DMSO. And so he did. In only three days, Daniel saw progress. Three days. His color is back. He is no longer losing his breath. He can carry his groceries. The fact that Daniel was even able to record this video telling his story is a miracle in itself!

Video Transcript AI Summary
My name is Daniel Stringfellow. I’m 74, August, and I live next door to my neighbor, Rebecca Cunningham. I have stage three COPD. My symptoms are labor of breathing, doing any small task, walking to my truck, even putting my clothes on in the morning. I labor at breathing, which is like working to just breathe, and I hate it. I noted that walking to my truck 40 feet, I have to stop halfway and catch my breath. Because of that, I have no motivation to do anything, and after a while, depression sets in because you can’t do the things you used to and you get tired of trying to breathe. At stage three they gave me a nebulizer as the first line of treatment from pulmonologists. It’s this stuff in a box that you use four times a day. I’ve tried using it for over a year and I notice no difference; I might as well be putting water in it, so I quit using it. They also gave inhalers like Trilogy and albuterol emergencies. I still use the Trilogy, but I don’t think there was a significant improvement. Rebecca mentioned DMSO and has been researching it. She asked me for the paperwork on the nebulizers to see what amount goes in. Rebecca gave me a solution to put in my nebulizer. It’s hard to say exactly when, but I think it was yesterday, Saturday. It’s been two weeks since I started it. In three days, I noticed a big difference—unbelievable. Everyone I know says my color was bad, but now I’m breathing better and I can talk without losing my breath. I’ve been able to do things I hadn’t been able to do in a long time. I carried groceries from my Jeep to my house. I used to labor just to get dressed in the morning; now I can, and there’s life again. I have a future CT scan coming, because all the other CT scans I had up until I started the DMSO weren’t showing any improvement, and they had stopped me at stage three. I don’t want to get any worse, but with what she gave me, I’m getting a lot better. I’ll see my pulmonologist after the CT scan, and I expect improvement when they see the CT results. I have nothing to gain by this, I just know what it’s like to have COPD, and it’s not pretty. Sometimes I wonder why I wake up in the morning, which is why I say, “You sure won’t kill you, but if you don’t…” I urge you to try it; you won’t kill you, but if you don’t, you might die. Rebecca will share the results of my CT scan and my pulmonologist visit to prove to you and to me that this is the only thing that’s worked for me. She mixed and prepared it, and I’ve read articles by Midwestern Doctor who has researched DMSO and other medications. If I hadn’t noticed, I’d still be miserable. I would still be living in it, especially with stage three COPD. My neighbor says, “Well anyway, you have a future CT scan and pulmonologist visit; I’ll share the results.” I’m grateful to Rebecca, and I’m getting better. Speaker 1: I’m off camera but I want to add that just the fact you’re able to sit and talk at this length is miraculous compared to how you were. It’s amazing to see you with color in your face now. You’re a treasure, and we all have those in our lives. The DMSO is working. I wanted you to witness that.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Daniel Stringfellow. I'm 74 at the August. And I live next door to my neighbor, Rebecca Cunningham. I've got stage three COPD. My symptoms are labor of breathing, doing any kind of small task, walking to my truck, even putting my clothes on in the morning. It's it's it's just even any any small task. I labor at breathing which is like working to just to breathe which I hate. I made some notes because I wanna cover everything. And so with that, like walking to my truck 40 feet, I have to stop halfway and catch my breath and that's just carrying me, nothing else. So, you know, you don't have, I don't have any motivation to do anything when when my was like that. Have no willpower and then, after a while, depression sets in because you you you can't do things you used to and you get tired of trying to breathe and so, on my stage one, they gave me a nebulizer. I think that must be their first rule of thumb, these pulmonologist. It's this stuff here. It's in a box. It says you do it four times a day. I'm sure if you all have it, these little things here And you I try I've been use I I've tried using that for over a year. It doesn't work for me. I could no notice no difference. I might as well just be putting water in it. So I quit using it. Okay. Now, of course, you know, they're gonna give you some inhalers too, like, oh, you know, Trilogy, maybe your out of albuterol emergencies, I I I still use the Trilogy, but I don't know. I I don't I don't can't see it was significant improvement. Okay. Well, Rebecca, my neighbor, mentions this about this DMSO. Okay? She's been researching it and she asked me for the paperwork. These nebulizers, I guess, to see what amount goes in the nebulizer. I don't know. You'll have to ask her about that. And so, you know, at that point, I'm ready to try anything and so, Rebecca gives me a solution to put in my nebulizer. And good lord, I think in third, I don't know if it's, it was yesterday, Saturday. Has it been two weeks or three? Speaker 1: Yeah, two weeks, I took. Two weeks. Yeah. Speaker 0: In three days, I noticed a big difference. Unbelievable. Everyone I know says my color is bad. I'm breathing and I I could talk without losing my breath. And and I I can do I've done things that I haven't been able to do in a long time. I carried my groceries from my Jeep to my house, RV, whatever. And I've never had them in a long time. I I you know, it's just it was in my, I really, I used to labor to get dressed in the morning. It take me a while. And that, there's no life. Yeah, I I mean, the improvements, if they're gonna work on me, they'll work on anyone. They have to have COPD. I just I just can't believe it. I'm blessed to have a neighbor that thinks of me, that cares. So I have a future CT scan coming because all the other CT scans I've had up until I started doing the DMSO. There wasn't any improvement. So that soon appears they've stopped me at stage three. I don't wanna get any worse. But with what she gave me, I'm getting a lot better. So I don't know. And then I I'll I'll go see my pulmonologist, after the CT scan. So I know there's gonna be improvement when they see the CT scan. There's gotta be a lot of improvement. So, you know, I have nothing to gain by this. I just know what it's like to have COPD, and you know it's not pretty at all. It just feels like sometimes I'd go to bed. I didn't I don't even know why I wake up the next morning. So y'all all yeah. Got nothing to lose. You sure won't kill you, but if you don't, I'm a think you you are gonna die. So listen. Just just do it. That's that's about all I got to say that I think Speaker 1: Well, I know I'll I'm I'm off camera back here, y'all. I will add a little bit Yes. That just the fact that you're able to sit here and talk about this at the length of time that you have been talking is miraculous compared to how you were. Speaker 0: I agree. Speaker 1: You know, just Speaker 0: I wouldn't be able Speaker 1: to meet you and to mean, it had gotten to the point where I I timed my questions. I knew you needed to sit down and rest a minute if I needed to come talk to you about anything because you needed that time. And even then, most of your answers would be two or three words, and then you'd have to catch your breath a while and then come back. And just being able to talk to you again and have you talked to me is awesome. Speaker 0: It is awesome. It's it's just I I I can clean my house. I just man, it's just unbelievable. It's great. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: Wow. It's Speaker 1: And I I know I I have seen the the depressed side too. Speaker 0: Have been Speaker 1: a few times where you had said, you know, you're just ready to die. And I was and in me, I'm going, no. I'm not ready to give you up yet. Well, you gotta just cut that shit out because I'm keeping you. Speaker 0: Well, you you figures they figure out something good. You you ought to be a doctor. So Speaker 1: Well Anyway, we'll we'll Speaker 0: we'll Rebecca will give you the results of my CT scan and my visit with pulmonologist because and and in that way because I I I know I wanna prove to y'all and to myself that this this is the only stuff that's ever worked for me. So I urge you to to do it. Yeah. Listen to her because she she's the one that came up with it and mixed it, everything. Speaker 1: So Well, I I read the articles that Midwestern Doctor wrote. And he because he has gone in very much in-depth into a lot of the things that DMSO can do, as well as some other medications that he's really researched. But lately he's been researching the DMSO, and I, lately I've been reading all those articles and a lot of the medical studies too. And if I hadn't noticed that, I mean Speaker 0: Yeah. I would I would still be in misery. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: I'd still be living in it's a miserable life, y'all. If you got COPD, especially stage three, then you'll you'll know what I'm talking about. You really will. It sucks. Yeah. Well, anyway Yeah. Y'all have a blessed rest of the day. Okay? I am. I might even start exercising. I'm leading up to that, y'all. Speaker 1: I'll I'll pull you into it. Next thing you know, you'll be walking up Mount Baldy in Speaker 0: the middle Speaker 1: of the morning. Speaker 0: Oh, wow. This don't get carried away. Speaker 1: So this is me. I'm the one behind the camera, and I'm not dressed for it or anything. I've been tearing my son's my grandson's bicycle apart to rebuild it. But I just that post on x picked up so much traction. I just I wanted y'all to see the person. And for you to be able to see that he has color in his face because he didn't before. He's a treasure, and we all have those in our lives. And I've lost a few treasures lately, and I didn't want to lose him too. And the DMSO is working. It's really working. And I wanted y'all to witness that. So thank you.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

A doctor treating a patient for severe cystic fibrosis reached out to @MidwesternDoc to share their patient’s story. A 45-year-old woman who was on track for a lung transplant, began treatment with DMSO and glutathione. After just one month, she was full of energy. She even went without antibiotics for the longest stretch since she was in her 20s. It’s nothing short of a miracle. And they have the pulmonary function tests from before and during treatment to back it up.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

One reader’s 85-year-old husband had pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. They gave him back rubs with DMSO and a big dose of good old fashioned sunlight. Suddenly and at age 85, he was making coffee, walking without a wheelchair, and going to church again. His doctors couldn’t explain it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

People who smoked for decades and were tied to their oxygen tanks seemingly for the rest of their lives have found success—in a week or less! After a week of DMSO inhalation via nebulizer, they could breathe again. Even without supplemental oxygen. One patient even walked 30 minutes on an elliptical after being bedridden for months! Let that sink in.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc It’s not just anecdotal. These recoveries line up with international research. In China, Germany, and Russia, DMSO has been shown to: • Reverse lung fibrosis • Prevent oxygen deprivation • Reduce lung swelling • Calm inflammatory cytokines • Restore mitochondrial function

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc If this sounds too good to be true—I understand! Read the evidence compiled by @MidwesternDoc for yourself. Every claim is backed up. DMSO is truly life changing. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-heals-the-lungs-and-cures-chronic-35a

DMSO Heals the Lungs and Cures Chronic Respiratory Diseases How DMSO treats Asthma, COPD, Pneumonia, ARDS and Pulmonary Fibrosis midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc DMSO also protects against toxic exposures. From wildfire smoke to chlorine, and from Teflon fumes to air pollution—DMSO helps the lungs detox and repair. It even reduces the genetic damage caused by cigarette smoke when paired with antioxidants like tea polyphenols.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

One of the most surprising findings? Chinese researchers showed that DMSO even protects against depleted uranium poisoning. What?! It reduces DNA breaks, prevents cell death, and restores cell signaling. Nine studies back this. But virtually no one in America is talking about it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Respiratory infections? DMSO breaks through bacterial defenses and boosts the success of antibiotics by 3 to 200 times. These infections—especially pneumonia—are a major killer. But once again, DMSO comes to the rescue. In one Libyan hospital, 31 patients with lung abscesses were treated with DMSO and antibiotics. All of them recovered fully and with no recurrence!

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Even tuberculosis—one of the deadliest infections in the world—responds to DMSO. It stops bacterial growth, enhances drug absorption, and heals the cavities left behind in the lungs. And it’s one of the few tools that work against drug-resistant strains.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Then there’s ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome), the nightmare lung collapse that puts people on ventilators. In rats and hamsters, DMSO reversed lung edema, inflammation, and cell death. One human study showed three patients with near-fatal ARDS recovered completely—one in just a week!

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

People with asthma are seeing incredible results. Dozens of @MidwesternDoc's readers have reported that they’ve ditched their inhalers, are breathing deeply again, and are finally living free of constant chest tightness. The science backs it all up. DMSO reduces the key immune cells involved in asthma attacks, enhances steroid effectiveness, and improves outcomes when combined with bronchodilators and antihistamines. No wonder the German DMSO community reports major success with asthma treatment. Even a 20-year-old cat’s asthma disappeared after a single DMSO application!

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Want to know where to get DMSO, which brands to trust, how to dose it, and the best way to use it for lung ailments? Subscribe to @MidwesternDoc for all the details. This information can literally save lives. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-heals-the-lungs-and-cures-chronic-35a

DMSO Heals the Lungs and Cures Chronic Respiratory Diseases How DMSO treats Asthma, COPD, Pneumonia, ARDS and Pulmonary Fibrosis midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Sinus infections, chronic coughs, bronchitis—they’re all being tackled by DMSO. People report instant relief where nothing else worked. Even symptoms linked to airborne toxins are being reversed.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

So why haven’t you heard about this? Because healing people doesn’t make money. Keeping them sick does. It’s basic math done by an industry that has everyone fooled. That’s why a dirt-cheap solvent that fixes inflammation, boosts drug delivery, and regenerates tissue got buried by regulators. And that’s exactly why it’s time to bring it back.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The medical system wants you trapped in their cycle of drugs, side effects, and hospital visits. By keeping you sick, they keep themselves alive. DMSO threatens that entire model—by actually fixing the underlying damage. If even half of these testimonials are true, this should be the biggest medical story of our time. But you won’t see this in the mainstream media.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc This is about reclaiming what works and taking back control of our health. Thousands are now healing—not because of the system, but in spite of it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-heals-the-lungs-and-cures-chronic-35a

DMSO Heals the Lungs and Cures Chronic Respiratory Diseases How DMSO treats Asthma, COPD, Pneumonia, ARDS and Pulmonary Fibrosis midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: The Remarkable Secrets of Coconuts https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-remarkable-secrets-of-coconuts

The Remarkable Secrets of Coconuts May's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. --> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/BpfPwkElA5

Saved - October 22, 2025 at 4:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe how hospitals allegedly profit from COVID protocols—Remdesivir, ventilators, early discharges—while denying cheaper therapies like ivermectin and sidelining independent judgment. Based on @MidwesternDoc’s report, NIH guidelines punished alternatives and rewarded costly care, with doctors pressured or fired. Families fighting for care, bedside advocacy, and revisiting forgotten therapies are urged to reform the system and restore doctor autonomy.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Hospitals murdered COVID patients. The more they killed, the more money they made. When the hospitals tested for COVID, they got paid more. When they admitted patients for COVID, they got paid more. When they put people on Remdesivir, they got paid more. And when they put loved ones on the ventilator, they got paid more. Meanwhile, family requests for ivermectin were denied, while their loved ones were placed on this death protocol instead. If you think this started with COVID, think again. Hospitals are still a death sentence for loved ones. Before the unexpected happens, learn how this death trap works to keep your loved ones safe. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-makes-h…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

COVID pulled the curtain back for millions of people. On a mass scale, we learned that hospitals across the country followed standardized federal protocols—not individualized care. Things like Remdesivir and ventilators were pushed on dying patients. Ivermectin and other affordable therapies were banned. Even when doctors knew their patients would die, many refused to try alternatives. And families were left in the dark.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Why did this happen? Because the NIH treatment guidelines (written by Fauci’s hand-picked panel) financially rewarded hospitals for using Remdesivir and ventilators, and punished them for using cheaper, off-patent drugs. Doctors who resisted were threatened and even fired. Hospitals that complied were paid handsomely. Even when their success rates treating COVID patients were abysmal.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

It’s common knowledge now. Remdesivir increased the death rate. Hospitals and doctors had to see it playing out in real time, but it stayed the “standard of care.” That’s because the committee behind those rules was stacked with people who had financial ties to Gilead, Remdesivir’s manufacturer. Nothing about the COVID protocols used by hospitals around the country and around the world was actually about saving patients.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The main cause of preventable hospital deaths isn’t illness itself, but blind obedience to “protocol.” When “protocols” replace thinking, patients die. It’s simple and it’s beyond tragic. This report by @MidwesternDoc lays out the case brilliantly: midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-makes-h…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Desperate families had to sue hospitals for the right to give dying relatives ivermectin. In 80 court cases handled by attorney Ralph Lorigo: • 40 families won—38 of those patients survived. • 40 families lost—only 2 survived. Those numbers speak volumes. But hospitals still refused to change course.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

One whistleblower nurse secretly recorded New York hospital staff during COVID. Doctors openly admitted that they’d rather follow orders than try something that might save someone’s life. Let that sink in. It was a moment that exposed just how far medicine had fallen. Unfortunately, this attitude wasn’t unique to COVID.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The dialogue centers on treatments and outcomes for COVID-19, with concerns about what is being used and what might work. One participant remarks on the reluctance to use certain treatments that are successful worldwide, recounting a conversation with a doctor. Another asks what kinds of treatments are being tried, noting that some approaches “are coming out with different things that are in the testing phase.” A third person criticizes a platform they believe “kills more people than actually save,” and another agrees that “they don’t work anyway,” questioning the harm in trying alternatives when current efforts aren’t effective. A key exchange discusses expectations for patient survival. One person says, “I don’t expect any of these people to survive. Ninety percent of them would die,” while another adds that if patients are “already dying anyway,” it may be reasonable to try additional measures rather than do nothing. There is debate about whether trying unproven treatments is appropriate; one participant notes that without a scientific basis, extra attempts can make patients worse, while another concedes that they would try anything to save their life. The conversation then shifts to clinical presentations and treatment strategies. With COVID patients who cannot breathe, X-rays show “the lungs are white,” indicating affected lungs with very thick, white secretions. The question arises of what “white lung” means—whether it is mucus and coating that fill the lungs and impede oxygen transfer. In response, the discussion distinguishes between early-stage treatments (like hydroxychloroquine and zinc) and later-stage interventions. It is stated that once lungs are severely affected, certain proven treatments exist that have passed trials in Asia through Dr. Chang, described as a US-board-certified physician. Specifically, extremely high-dose IV vitamin C is claimed to be successful in treating patients, providing the lungs with antioxidant support to help expel the infection, alongside IV antibiotics to treat the infection while avoiding reliance on ventilation and sedation. There is a contrast drawn between approaches in different regions. The dialogue notes that high-dose IV vitamin C has passed three trials in Asia and is reported as effective, while in the speaker’s locale, there is hesitation or reluctance to adopt this method. The discussion ends with a remark about how some people might attribute success to “good genes,” implying a belief that genetics may influence susceptibility or outcomes, though this is stated rather than argued as a scientific conclusion. Overall, the conversation emphasizes that several participants are wary of conventional treatments, advocate for exploring high-dose IV vitamin C as a therapeutic option, and describe the characteristic radiographic and clinical features of severe COVID-19 lung involvement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I mean, when you think about it, it's sick. It's the Speaker 1: same reason they won't use, like, other treatments that are being that are successful around the world. And I had a conversation with a doctor about this. Speaker 2: Are you guys doing, like, different sorts of, like, treatments? Because I know, like Speaker 3: Nothing works. Speaker 2: They have yeah. But, I mean, there's you know, they're coming out with different things that are in the testing phase. Speaker 3: The same thing they come with a platform and that kill more people than actually save. Uh-huh. So that's one. Speaker 1: And he said that they don't work anyway. And I told him, well, obviously, what you guys have going on here isn't working. So what's the harm in trying? Speaker 3: I don't expect any of these people to survive. Ninety percent of them would die. Speaker 2: I mean, it's just maintaining. So I figured if it's assumed they're gonna die anyway Yeah. Just not throw a few. Speaker 3: Well, it's you know? Yeah. I I don't know. That's that's always an issue in medicine whether you should just look into whether they're dying anywhere or not. I Speaker 0: But if you could find a cure Speaker 3: Yeah. I mean, like cure. So there's no antiviral therapy. The only way to do it is cure. But I there's no treatment, Speaker 2: I should say. Speaker 0: Re rephrase. Treatment. Speaker 3: You could treat it, but but, you know, it's you have to have some scientific basis for whether these things are working or not. They're throwing everything at them. You could make them worse. Speaker 2: Uh-huh. So Worse than death. Worse than death? Speaker 3: Well, we said ninety percent, maybe that ten percent maybe maybe they're two. I don't know. Speaker 2: Yeah. So Speaker 3: but, I mean, if there's no basis for it working, I mean, you wanna just try things just because. I mean Speaker 2: I would. Oh, I might. Yeah. Save my life. Yeah. Hell yeah. Speaker 4: So with these actual COVID patients, they they present by not really being able to breathe. Maybe they've, as you say, they've probably waited too long. They're not able to breathe, and some of that's anxiety. And and what else so what else do they what how how else do they present? Speaker 0: So their lungs, if you look at their X Speaker 1: rays, you can immediately see that these patients are affected by COVID because they're white. Their lungs are white. And the secretions are really, really thick, and white. And that's what Speaker 0: the the photo or the X-ray of these lungs look like. Speaker 4: And what so what does a white lung look mean? What is that? Is that just is that mucus Speaker 0: in the lung? It's coated. It's almost like their lungs are coated. Speaker 4: So so that makes it hard to obviously transfer oxygen into the bloodstream. And so okay. So they've got very mucousy lungs. And how how do you deal with that? Is that what hydroxychloroquine and zinc do? Or Speaker 1: I mean, those treatments are for beginning stages. Speaker 0: Like, once Speaker 1: you get to the stage where your lungs are looking like that and you're having a lot of trouble breathing, there are proven treatments that have passed, like, three trials in Asia through Doctor. Chang. He's a US board certified physician. Is this, like, extremely high dose IV vitamin c. He's successfully treating people with that. And what that's doing is it's giving your body, essentially your lungs, like, the power, the antioxidant power to kick it out Speaker 3: Mhmm. Speaker 1: While you can be getting IV antibiotics to be treating this and getting rid of it. But they don't wanna have anything to do with it here. What they wanna do is just throw them on a vent and sedate them. Speaker 2: Yeah. Have you done the high dose IV vitamin c that's successful in Asia? Speaker 3: Work. Do you need other stuff? There's no Speaker 2: But it Speaker 3: is basic for vitamin c if you're working here. Speaker 2: And then Speaker 0: Well, the doctor Chang, he was the Speaker 2: one that it went through Speaker 0: the the that high dose. I'm talking super high dose IV vitamin c. That's super antioxidants. Helps your body fight that. Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 0: It passed three three trials, and it's being effective. It's just weird how, like, Speaker 3: good jeans. If you're not getting sick, I don't think it's time why you didn't see. I mean, just a good jeans.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Well before the pandemic, this shift was already underway. Medicine was moving away from the art of healing toward algorithmic obedience and billing codes. In this new world of medicine, doctors are trained to follow protocols, not question them. Independent judgment is punished. Bureaucratic compliance is rewarded.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Hospitals have become more dangerous than the diseases they treat. @MidwesternDoc is shining a light on how—and what it’ll take to fix it. Read the full report. midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-makes-h…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Hospitals are no longer run by doctors, but by corporate administrators obsessed with metrics. When it comes to health and medical care, some metrics make sense. For instance, things like infection rates make sense to track. Others are meaningless (like vaccination rates), yet they determine how much Medicare reimburses hospitals. Doctors are trained and incentivized to chase numbers instead of outcomes.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Right now, the U.S. spends more on healthcare than any other equally wealthy nation—two to four times as much—yet has the worst outcomes. In 1900, healthcare cost 0.25% of GDP. Now, it’s a monstrous industry built to serve investors, not patients. Profit has replaced purpose. It’s profit over people to an extreme. And most people who end up in a hospital aren’t prepared for it.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Hospitals are financially rewarded for shorter stays, not successful recoveries. Read that again. Medicare and JHACO accreditation require the average hospital stay to be under 96 hours. Doctors are pressured to discharge patients early. And may be reprimanded when they don’t. Patients who can’t recover fast enough are pushed toward palliative care or even hospice. That should make everyone very, very angry.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

This rule is literally killing people. That’s not a stretch. Frailer patients often can’t handle the same aggressive drug doses used on stronger ones. They need slower, gentler care for success—but that obviously takes time. Hospitals and their doctors don’t have time. They have quotas.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Take congestive heart failure, for example. Aggressive fluid-draining over two days works for some strong and otherwise healthy patients. But in weaker ones, that level of aggression can cause kidney failure or death. A slower, 4–5 day approach saves lives. There’s no question. But hospitals don’t care. They push patients through like cattle on a conveyor belt.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

When those patients who need more care and a slower pace inevitably decline, families are told: “There’s nothing more we can do.” Then comes the morphine drip. The “comfort care.” The hospice transfer. But there is more they can do. There’s a lot more they could have done. Instead, they choose systematized euthanasia. And it’s disguised as efficiency. It’s disgusting.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Because hospitals want empty beds, they invest in social workers to handle discharges, not nurses to handle needed care. If every floor had just a couple more nurses, outcomes would improve dramatically. But administrators won’t pay for that, because it doesn’t boost metrics—at least not the ones they’re interested in measuring.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

This obsession with early discharge actually costs more. Patients leave before they’ve healed and often celebrate it, thinking that, despite how they feel, they must be strong enough to go home. But they bounce back to the hospital for readmission—starting a fatal cycle that drains money and lives. Quality analysts inside the system see the data. It’s so obvious. But they’re ignored.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

It’s the same logic that shaped Obamacare. Policies aimed to reduce end-of-life costs by denying costly care to people at the end of their lives. Critics called the practice death panels. Right now, about one-fourth of all medical spending happens in the final year of life. Bureaucrats are always trying to shrink that number. How? By shrinking life itself.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Modern doctors are trained not to think. They’re taught to follow the playbook, call for consults, and “manage expectations.” We put them on a pedestal, but they’ve become mindless drones with a really expensive education.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Hospital doctors today are taught to accept death, not prevent it. Of course, death is inevitable, but there’s often a fairly wide spectrum between entering the hospital and leaving via the morgue. Death need not be an option for many people who unfortunately unnecessarily reach that outcome.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc To Make America Healthy Again, we need to retrain doctors to think critically and outside of the box, tailor treatment to the unique patient before them, listen to patients and their families, and break free from bureaucratic pressure. It’s not impossible.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Emergencies happen. Despite our best efforts, we and the people we love sometimes end up in the hospital. So how can families protect themselves? Find out which hospitals and doctors near you have better outcomes. When someone you love is hospitalized, stay at the bedside 24/7 as an advocate. Engage staff calmly—build a trusting relationship, not confrontation. And as always, treat at home with proper medical support whenever possible.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc During COVID, countless families secretly gave “unapproved” treatments like ivermectin or vitamins—and their loved ones survived. Those who trusted the system often didn’t. It was tragic. Sometimes saving a life means defying the rules.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

There are still good doctors hidden within hospitals—the ones who think, question, problem solve, get creative, talk to their patients, and refuse to abandon the art of medicine. Pierre Kory once analyzed ICU records and found massive differences in survival depending on which doctor you got. In medicine, who treats you matters more than where you are. That shouldn’t be the case. But it is.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Now imagine if hospitals revived the therapies that once worked—the ones bureaucrats buried. Things like ultraviolet blood irradiation, DMSO, and high-dose IV vitamin C for sepsis (the #1 killer in hospitals). Each could save thousands. Yet all were erased to protect the pharmaceutical monopoly.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The most effective medical intervention of COVID wasn’t a drug. It was suing the hospital. 38 lived. 2 didn’t. It shouldn’t be that way, but it is. Here’s what that says about our system: midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-makes-h…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc If RFK Jr. follows through on reform, the quickest way we can improve outcomes is hospital trials of these forgotten therapies—and restoring doctor autonomy. Healing must come before profit. Doctors must not be punished for trying to save lives.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Hospitals don’t have to be where you go to die. But as long as money dictates medicine, they will be. The cure isn’t another regulation or billion-dollar drug—it’s remembering what healing actually means and giving the power to heal back to doctors.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-makes-hospitals-so-deadly-and

What Makes Hospitals So Deadly and How Can We Fix It? November's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc. The Great Alzheimer’s Scam and The Proven Cures They’ve Buried for Billions https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-alzheimers-scam-and-the

The Great Alzheimer's Scam and The Proven Cures They've Buried for Billions Decades of neglect in understanding the actual causes of dementia have transformed it into one of the most costly diseases in existence. midwesterndoctor.com
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 12:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that BlackRock and Blackstone are quietly expanding their grip on America’s power grid, telling the public it’s for AI. Billions have gone to natural gas plants and utilities, while a BlackRock subsidiary now controls Wisconsin’s Superior Water, Light & Power. Executives say the moves fuel the AI revolution, but critics warn it’s about control, with ties to the WEF and CFR. Watch @zeee_media’s full episode for the details.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

DISTURBING: BlackRock and Blackstone are quietly seizing control of America’s power grid—while telling the public it’s all for AI. Behind the slick talk of “innovation” lies a sweeping transfer of control, handing the nation’s energy supply to two of the most powerful financial empires on Earth. Over the past year, Blackstone has spent billions acquiring natural gas plants and utilities across Indiana, Virginia, Pennsylvania, and New Mexico, while BlackRock’s subsidiary took majority control of Wisconsin’s Superior Water, Light & Power. Executives admit these deals are meant to fuel “the AI revolution”—a data-center boom already driving up energy costs and straining the grid. Critics say this has little to do with progress and everything to do with control. With trillions in assets and deep ties to the WEF and CFR, BlackRock and Blackstone are positioning themselves to decide who gets power in the age of AI. @zeee_media's report exposes how this quiet takeover could determine who controls your power—and your freedom. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v70kess-technocracy-expanding-blackrock-buying-up-power-companies-daily-pulse-ep-13.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 contends that concerns over rising power bills due to AI data centers are about to worsen as BlackRock and Blackstone buy up local power utilities. The piece, attributed to The New American, claims globalist equity firms are acquiring local energy companies nationwide to support AI infrastructure, provoking pushback from ratepayers and regulators. The Associated Press is cited as reporting that private equity giants are purchasing utilities to power AI-driven data centers, raising ratepayer and regulator concerns, with Oregon Citizens Utility Board noting increased public discussion at Public Utility Commissions. Speaker 0 notes a widespread anxiety about electricity costs tied to aging and expanding power infrastructure, including lines, poles, transformers, and generators, as utilities harden for extreme weather. The narrative asserts that apart from general cost increases, the core issue is the AI race, and that large international asset firms are eager to back a technology with potential for surveillance, manipulation, and control, while also seeking strong returns on investment. It claims these firms have historically used monetary power to push corporate support for climate alarmism and transgender activism, and that BlackRock and Blackstone together controlled more than $13 trillion in assets (BlackRock about $12 trillion; Blackstone about $1.2 trillion). It states only the U.S. and China have GDPs larger than $13 trillion. Concrete buyouts and investments are listed: January 2024, Blackstone bought a 20% stake in Northern Indiana Public Service Company for $2.1 billion, with the utility planning to boost green energy production afterward. In January 2025, Blackstone outright bought Potomac Energy Center, a natural gas power plant in Loudoun County, Virginia, for $1 billion, described as Blackstone’s most recent investment in power infrastructure for AI. In March 2025, Wisconsin’s Public Service Commission approved the buyout of Superior Water, Light, and Power by Canada Pension Plan Investment Board and BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners, with BlackRock taking a 60% majority stake. A separate deal: Blackstone bought Hilltop Energy Center, a natural gas power plant in Pennsylvania, for $1 billion, with executives Bilal Khan and Mark Zhu describing the acquisition as AI-focused. Blackstone is also seeking regulatory permission to buy Albuquerque-based Public Service Company of New Mexico and Texas New Mexico PowerCo, while BlackRock and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board’s attempted purchase of Minnesota Power faces regulatory turbulence; a Minnesota sale could determine how such firms expand in a sector linking households, data centers, and power sources. Speaker 0 adds that the rise of AI is providing these firms with an “excuse” to control infrastructure, and mentions Yuval Noah Harari and the WEF. It cites the WEF’s “you will own nothing” rhetoric and notes Harari’s hypothetical about future irrelevance, Neuralink, and a broader agenda including surveillance, ownership consolidation, and potential reductions in access to private property. It asserts Larry Fink of BlackRock is at the WEF and CFR, and that BlackRock’s broader investments include real estate, farmland, timberland, and single-family rental homes, as part of a “build to rent” scheme. The piece warns that one corporation controlling vast natural resources and power utilities amid rising prices would be disastrous, urging citizens to resist BlackRock’s influence. It contrasts China’s influence with BlackRock’s power, condemning ESG models and the World Economic Forum’s agenda toward a “great reset,” digital currency, digital ID, and reduced access to resources. Speaker 1 interjects with a separate 1999 statement about how genetic engineering will change us and implies a need to start conversations now, arguing that one direction relinquishes power to others while the other empowers individuals to fix themselves. Speaker 0 reiterates that the conversation centers on power, AI, and control, warning against allowing a single corporation to own essential resources. The closing note references the January 1999 statement on genetic engineering, while Speaker 1 emphasizes taking personal power to fix oneself, framing the discussion as a shift in responsibility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you're concerned about your power bills skyrocketing because of AI data centers that absolutely no one wants continuing to prop up in your communities, it looks like that is about to get a whole lot worse. BlackRock and Blackstone are buying up local power companies. This is from The New American. It says globalist equity firms are scooping up local energy companies across the country, and it looks like they're just getting started. The official reason is to invest in America's artificial intelligence infrastructure. The buyouts are already triggering pushback and anxiety at the local level. The Associated Press recently reported that private equity giants like BlackRock and Blackstone are buying local utilities to power AI driven data centers, sparking rate payer and regulator concerns. Worries about the rising power bills have been mounting in tandem with the buildup of AI data centers around the country. Earlier this year, the AP reported rising power bills are something legislators have been hearing a lot about. More people are speaking out at the Public Utility Commission in the past year than I've ever seen before, said Charlotte Schuff of the Oregon Citizens Utility Board, a consumer advocacy group. There's a massive outcry. Tricia Pridemore, who sits on Georgia's Public Service Commission to and is president of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, pointed to an already tightened electricity supply and increasing costs for power lines, utility poles, transformers, and generators as utilities replace aging equipment or harden it against extreme weather. But as we all know, apart from the rising costs of everything, despite the media and the admin gaslighting us that everything's getting cheaper, what this is all really about is AI. The article continues. The AI race is well underway. It's no surprise that these massive international assets firms, given their history, are eager to support a technology with unprecedented potential for surveillance, manipulation, and outright control. There's also this prospect of a great return on investment, which is the official primary goal of these equity firms. But as history shows, these multitrillion dollar entities are not afraid to throw around their monetary might and bully companies into incorporating their brand political causes, such as climate alarmism and the transgender. BlackRock and Blackstone used to be the same company before separating in '88. Together, they control more than 13,000,000,000,000 in assets. The bulk of that, about 12,000,000,000,000, is BlackRock's, while Blackstone has reported about 1,200,000,000,000.0 in assets. Only two countries have GDPs larger than $13,000,000,000,000, The US and China. Now the they're scooping up utilities. The two behemoths are picking off utilities around the country. In January '24, Blackstone bought a 20% stake in Northern Indiana Public Service Company for $2,100,000,000. The utility announced it planned to boost green energy production after Blackstone entered the picture. A year later in January, Blackstone outright bought Potomac Energy Center, a natural gas power plant in Loudoun County, Virginia for $1,000,000,000. The transaction represents Blackstone's most recent investment in the power infrastructure supporting data centers and AI revolution, Blackstone announced after the deal went through. A few months later, in March '25, Wisconsin's Public Service Commission approved the buyout of Superior Water, Light, and Power by Canada Pension Plan Investment Board and BlackRock subsidiary, Global Infrastructure Partners. BlackRock walked away from the deal with a majority interest, a 60% stake of the utility. The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, by the way, is essentially controlled by Canada's socialist government. And just last month, Blackstone bought Hilltop Energy Center, a natural gas power plant in Pennsylvania, for $1,000,000,000. Blackstone executives Bilal Khan and Mark Zhu said the buyout is all about AI. The electricity infrastructure required to power the AI revolution requires a tremendous amount of capital. We are proud to make our latest investment in this sector, they said in a statement. And this appears to be just the beginning. Currently, Blackstone is seeking regulatory permission to buy out a pair of utilities, Albuquerque based Public Service Company of New Mexico and Lewisville, Texas based Texas New Mexico PowerCo, according to reports. Public service company is the largest electricity company in New Mexico. However, an attempt by BlackRock and the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board to buy the parent company of Minnesota Utility has run into some turbulence. The AP reports a fight has erupted in Minnesota over the buyout of the parent, dualolith based Minnesota Power, and the outcome could determine how such firms expand their holdings in an industry that's a nexus between regular people, gargantuan data centers, and the power sources they share. If the Minnesota utility sale goes through, BlackRock will have the majority stake. Now the rise of AI is providing them with the perfect excuse for their stated goal. By the way, the the WEF has openly said that you will own nothing and apparently be happy about it. Yuval Noah Harari of the WEF says, oh, what are we gonna do when humans just become irrelevant? We'll just drug them and give them video games. I mean, this is what these people have said. Elon Musk has suggested that with the rise of humans becoming useless in the age of AI, we'll just give them Neuralink to help them become one with the AI. So, of course, all of these, the this AI rise of AI gives them an excuse to strip people of access to natural resources, utilities, private property. All of these things are being systematically stripped from the people, and it has not slowed down. BlackRock's Larry Fink is now at the WEF. The article concludes with saying globalist agenda. Fink is a globalist caricature. He sits on the board of the Globalist Council on Foreign Relations, which is essentially the deep state's nervous system in The US. He's a member of the Trilateral Commission, a more exclusive group of elite globalists. He also happens to be the new CEO of the World Economic Forum, an outfit of millionaires, billionaires, and political figures that has openly admitted to wanting a world which regular people will own nothing. By the way, Peter Thiel, closely allied with the Trump admin, is part of all of these people as well. The CEO of Blackstone is Steven Schwartzman. Like, think he's a CFR member and a member of the WEF. These giant firms, along with others, have shown that they have no problem with coercing the world into implementing their agenda. And the more control they assume over infrastructure and institutions, the easier that becomes. BlackRock and Blackstone are not only work working toward the control of the companies that power everyday homes, but they've invested through various subsidiaries in real estate. Lots of it. They bought commercial properties, farmland, timberland, and even single family homes. That's the build to rent scheme as well that's going on. As as a side note where they are building homes that literally they plan on making sure no one ever owns. It's it's a forever rental home, and BlackRock is heavily invested in that as well. It says, of course, they're investing in AI, an emerging technology that promises to change the way we do nearly everything. Based on their track record, these companies cannot be trusted to prioritize the needs and concerns of everyday people. Citizens who know the truth about these companies should help others in their community understand what they're really about. Unfortunately, we continue to see crony capitalism flourishing under this current administration. Perhaps they're doing something about the amount of farmland China is allowed to own. But are they doing anything about BlackRock aiming to own almost everything? Because while China would definitely have nefarious intent, let me tell you BlackRock is no different. From the poisonous ESG models they pushed all over the world to now think being at the top of the WEF whose agenda is to literally accelerate the great reset, pushing people into serfdom, universal basic income, managed by digital currency, digital ID, a lack of real food, and a lack of natural resources all under the control of a corporation that just so happens to be very cozy with the very surveillance system pulsing through the federal government aka Palantir. Well, let me tell you, ladies and gentlemen, unless we recognize this very real problem, America will be in a world of trouble. When you have one single corporation in charge of so many natural resources, especially power companies with communities already experiencing skyrocketing energy and water prices because of these data centers, which are truly for the purpose of worldwide surveillance and world government, that spells an absolutely disastrous outcome. We cannot let this world be owned by BlackRock. Speaker 1: This is January 1999. The statement in the subtitle is how genetic engineering will change us when in the next century. Speaker 0: Statin drugs will shut down the absorption of co q ten. Speaker 1: And that's why what doctor Brook was saying, we need to we're doing this because this conversation has to start now. Because one way direction is giving up your power to somebody else to fix you. The other way is you taking your own power to fix yourself.
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 7:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recount Colbert turning on his own side, pressing KJP and saying the debate exposed a troubling moment, not a betrayal. He cites age and a startling performance under pressure, while not questioning his heart or policies. KJP defends Biden’s long record as good; Colbert calls the debate performance harrowing and insists, despite disagreements, we’re not going to agree.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Stephen Colbert TURNS on KJP with a brutal reality check on her claim that Biden’s ousting was a “betrayal.” It’s not every day you see Colbert go after his own side. By the end, he grew so tired of KJP’s spin, he started talking down to her like a child. COLBERT: “I saw a guy who I had not seen backstage… It seemed like a dramatically different person. And at 81 years old, that’s not entirely unexpected. You can imagine why people got so worried.” KJP: “No one is saying that he didn’t age. I’m talking about did he have… the mental acuity, was he able to govern? And the man that I saw nearly every day was someone who was engaging, understood policy, and was always putting the American people first.” COLBERT: “I don’t think anybody questioned his heart or his policies. But it takes more than that to be the President of the United States. And in a moment of great pressure on stage, we saw someone shock us and worry us, and nothing could assuage that worry. So I don’t think it was necessarily a betrayal of Joe Biden as other people saying, ‘We don’t think we were shown the Joe Biden that you saw.’” KJP: “I saw every day a really ugly assault on someone who had 50-plus years of experience and who, again, objectively had done a good job as President of the United States. And it was heartbreaking to see that type of behavior.” COLBERT: “What happened was the debate performance. Everything is downstream of that.” KJP: “And no one is saying that the debate performance wasn’t shocking, wasn’t a disappointment. No one is saying that.” COLBERT: “Disappointment is such a light term.” KJP: “I use your word.” COLBERT (mocking): “It was harrowing. Look, listen, we’re never going to agree on this.” KJP: “We’re not.” COLBERT: “Other than the fact that I’m glad that you came here tonight and I’m telling you to wrap over there. Would you like to say one more thing before we go?”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 recounts seeing a man backstage at a benefit who looked dramatically different, noting that at 81 this is not wholly unexpected and that people’s worry was understandable. Speaker 1 responds by saying he sees Joe Biden almost every day and emphasizes that no one has said Biden has an age-related decline in governance. Biden would joke about aging and acknowledge it, admitting he doesn’t speak or walk as well as he used to, but Speaker 1 argues that the mental acuity and ability to govern were evident, with Biden engaging, understanding policy, and putting the American people first, which showed in what he could get done. Speaker 1 cautions against questioning heart or policies but notes that leadership requires more, and during a moment of great pressure on stage, there was a shock and worry that could not be assuaged. Speaker 0 adds that they cannot fault the factual basis of the concerns or the feelings, but emphasizes that the debate performance is what matters downstream. Speaker 1 acknowledges that the debate performance was shocking and disappointing, and describes the disappointment as significant, using Speaker 0’s word “herald” to characterize it. Speaker 0 concedes ongoing disagreement, and both express appreciation for the other’s presence tonight. Speaker 1 asks if there is one more thing to say, and Speaker 0 leaves the closing remark open.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I saw a guy who I had not seen backstage at the the benefit that I did. It seemed like a dramatically different person. And at 81 years old, that's not entirely unexpected. You can imagine why people got so worried. Speaker 1: So, a couple of things. I got to see Joe Biden almost every day. And this is a question that I take very seriously. I never no one has ever said he has an age. No one ever said that. He would make jokes about it, he would acknowledge it, and he would say, Yes. I know I don't speak as well as I used to. I don't walk as well as I used to. No one is saying that he didn't age. I'm talking about, he did he have the the question that I was getting, the mental acuity, was he able to govern? And the man that I saw nearly every day was someone who was engaging, understood policy, and was always putting the American people first. And it showed. It showed in able to get done. I remember, I so I don't even Speaker 0: question his heart or or or his policies. But it takes more than that to be the president of The United States. And in a moment of great pressure on stage, we saw someone shock us and worry us, and no nothing could assuage that worry. So, I don't think it was necessarily a betrayal of Joe Biden as other people saying, we don't think we were shown saw Joe Biden that you saw. Speaker 1: Every day a really ugly assault on someone who had fifty plus years of experience and who, again, objectively had done a good job as president of The United States. And it was heartbreaking to see that type of behavior. Speaker 0: I think all of that, everything you're saying, I cannot fault the factual basis of of what you're saying or your feelings about it. But, what happened was the debate performance. Everything is downstream of that. Speaker 1: And and no one is saying that the debate performance wasn't shocking, wasn't a disappointment. No one is saying Disappointment Speaker 0: is such a light Speaker 1: I I use your words. It was heral. I use your words. Speaker 0: Okay. Look. Listen. We're never gonna agree on this Speaker 1: We're not. Speaker 0: Other than the fact that I'm glad that you came here tonight. I appreciate over there. Would you Speaker 1: like to say one think more thing before we Speaker 0: that.
Saved - October 18, 2025 at 1:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reveal that the real cause of heart disease was buried to push cholesterol as the villain. Statins flood America, weakening repair systems by lowering cholesterol. Ancel Keys cherry-picked data; sugar, not fat, drives disease. Data is hidden, guidelines rigged, profits fuel the march. Statins cause muscle, brain, sleep issues; CoQ10 loss cripples energy. The system silences dissent.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The real cause of heart disease has been buried for decades in favor of the lie about cholesterol. 40 million Americans take statins to lower their cholesterol, thinking it’s the best way to protect their hearts. But what doctors never tell them is that statins interfere with the body’s natural repair system, weakening the very cells that rely on cholesterol to function. In trying to prevent disease, they’re paradoxically fueling it. This report exposes what really happens to the body when you take a statin every day. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-are-statins-so-dangerous

Why Are Statins So Dangerous? Unpacking one of the largest scams in medicine midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

For years, doctors have been taught that high cholesterol causes heart attacks. They’ve passed the warning along to their patients, and most of us have believed them. But that idea came from one man: Ancel Keys. Keys cherry-picked data to make fat and cholesterol look deadly while ignoring the real culprit: sugar. John Yudkin tried to warn the world that sugar—not fat—was driving heart disease. But no one listened. He was ridiculed, silenced, and erased from history.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Evidence now shows the incredibly influential study from Keys was pure manipulation. If he had chosen data from a different set of countries, the results would have shown the exact opposite—that more saturated fat actually meant less heart disease. That’s huge. And it turns out hidden research funded by the sugar industry paid scientists to shift the blame to fat. What came next was the multi-trillion-dollar low-fat, high-sugar processed food empire—and an epidemic of chronic illness—that we’re now stuck in the middle of.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

By the 1980s, the cholesterol myth became medical dogma. Everyone knew it. Everyone repeated it. In the nick of time, a new drug hit the market: statins—designed to lower cholesterol. Exactly what everyone needed to fight the new disease sweeping America: “high cholesterol.” Overnight, medical guidelines shifted, labeling millions as “at risk.” The lower your cholesterol, the better! No matter the cost! And that’s how statins became a lifetime prescription.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Don’t miss the forgotten history of how one false study reshaped modern medicine, and how statins became untouchable from @MidwesternDoc: midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-are-stat…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The problem is actually pretty simple. Cholesterol is not the villain. It turns out cholesterol is actually essential for hormone production, brain function, and cellular repair. Your body makes it for a reason! But the drug industry doesn’t care about biology—they care about numbers and money. So statins became the tool to fix a number, not a patient. And once the profit machine started, there was no going back.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Statin use exploded. How many people in your life are taking them right now? Are you? In 2008, just 12% of Americans over 40 were on statins. By 2019, it was 35%—over 90 million people. Wow. Just look at these numbers from Denmark. And yet independent research shows the shocking truth: Taking a statin every day for 5 years only extends life by 3 to 4 days on average. Only in men. Women, meanwhile, get zero benefit. Unbelievable.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

So how do drug companies sell us a useless pill so well? By controlling the data. All major statin trial data is locked inside a private, industry-funded organization that refuses to release it to independent scientists. That’s suspicious. They publish glowing reviews, attack critics, and declare the drugs “safe and effective.” No one outside the system can check the numbers. Sound familiar? It should.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The same data suppression playbook used during COVID was used for statins years earlier. @MidwesternDoc has all the details. midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-are-stat…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Even the medical guidelines were rigged. The National Cholesterol Education Program, which sets the treatment rules, was stacked with members paid by statin manufacturers. Talk about a conflict of interest… One independent review of the same data even came to the opposite conclusion: Statins “have not been shown to provide an overall health benefit.” But the machine was already built. Doctors were taught that everyone with high cholesterol needs a statin. Patients who refused were scolded—or even dropped by their doctors.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Then insurance companies joined in and actually penalized patients who didn’t take them! Some employers even started requiring “healthy cholesterol levels” as part of their wellness programs. Soon, the entire medical system was enforcing a lie. Even worse, the calculator doctors use to determine your “heart risk” was later found to overestimate heart attacks and strokes by 600%!! And yet, the guidelines never changed.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Here’s the kicker. Doctors are financially rewarded for prescribing statins. Those who question the drug are financially penalized. Just like with COVID shots, a “cancel culture” formed around dissent. Critics were labeled “statin deniers” and accused of killing their patients. How absurd is that? The pattern is the same: They invent the threat, create the cure, silence any opposition, and profit forever and ever.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

And here’s where it gets really serious. It’s just not just about taking a useless drug. What happens when tens of millions of people take a drug that blocks one of their body’s essential enzymes? It causes a tidal wave of side effects—and a medical establishment is blind to it because they’re in denial. Statins block the enzyme that produces cholesterol… but that same enzyme also creates Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), vital for energy, heart function, and muscle health. Without it, the body begins to fall apart.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Patients on statins experience a big list of side effects. Things like: • Muscle pain and weakness • Chronic fatigue • Brain fog, confusion, and memory loss • Depression and irritability • Sleep issues and nerve damage • Diabetes, liver failure, and even cancer Up to 30% of users experience serious side effects—yet most are told it’s “just in their head” or it’s chalked up to aging. Still sound familiar? And all of this for an extra couple of days of life? Is that worth it?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

When patients complain, doctors are told to blame the “nocebo effect”—the idea that side effects happen only because patients expect them to happen. But many of these people had no idea statins caused these problems until it happened. They’re not making it up. And why would they? It’s the very same gaslighting we saw during COVID, when vaccine injuries were dismissed as “anxiety” and people just buying into the “fear-mongering.”

Saved - October 15, 2025 at 10:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report on a buried study highlighted in Del Bigtree’s An Inconvenient Study. The data allegedly show vaccinated children have dramatically higher rates of asthma (4.29x), autoimmune disorders (~6x), and neurodevelopmental issues (>5x). Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated, there were zero ADHD, diabetes, learning disabilities, or behavioral disorders. Dr. Zervos reportedly said publishing it could end his career. Watch the episode for the data.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

REPORT: A buried study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children has finally come to light—and the results are shattering the vaccine narrative. Featured in Del Bigtree’s new film An Inconvenient Study (http://aninconvenientstudy.com), this long-suppressed data reveals what public health agencies have refused to examine for decades: vaccinated children suffer dramatically higher rates of chronic illness. Led by Dr. Marcus Zervos of Henry Ford Health, the study found vaccinated kids were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma, nearly six times more likely to develop autoimmune disorders, and over five times more likely to suffer neurodevelopmental issues. Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, learning disabilities, or behavioral disorders. When confronted with the findings, Dr. Zervos admitted on hidden camera, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” This could be the biggest medical cover-up of our time. See the data for yourself in @zeee_media's explosive report. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v70b4rq-bombshell-vax-vs.-unvaxx-study-and-50-digital-id-countries-by-2028-daily-pu.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript centers on a new vaxxed versus unvaxxed study promoted by Del Bigtree in his film An Inconvenience Study, which follows an exchange with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Health in Detroit. Zervos agreed in 2016 to undertake a public health comparison of health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children and published results regardless of the outcome. The film also cites prior evidence challenging vaccine safety, including Dr. Peter Abi (Abi) who, after promoting the DTP vaccine in Guinea Bissau, found that the vaccine protected against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis but was associated with more than a twofold increase in overall mortality; he notes that no routine vaccine was tested for overall mortality in randomized trials before introduction, and asserts that vaccines’ effects on overall mortality are not well understood. The discussion quotes a summary from Guinea Bissau stating that only half the children were vaccinated, enabling a perfect comparative study. The vaccination program, introduced in the late seventies after smallpox eradication successes, reportedly showed that the DTP vaccine was associated with two point three times higher mortality, with the twofold higher mortality linked to whooping cough protection not translating to overall mortality benefits. The film also highlights Dr. Paul Thomas, whose practice data on 3,324 children suggested unvaccinated kids had better health outcomes and fewer doctor visits; it lists numerous conditions with higher incidence in vaccinated children (fever, ear pain and infections, conjunctivitis, eye disorders, asthma, hay fever, sinus issues, breathing problems, anemia, eczema, hives, dermatitis, behavioral issues, gastroenteritis, weight/eating disorders, and ADHD with zero cases in the unvaccinated group). The Oregon Medical Board suspended Thomas’s license soon after publication, and the study was later retracted. The segment presents Thomas’s claims as the basis for ongoing concerns about vaccine safety, and the film frames these suspensions as part of a broader pattern of data being dismissed when results are unfavorable to vaccines. The film recounts how Bigtree recruited Dr. Zervos to conduct a large-scale study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children, using Henry Ford Health’s large database. Zervos completed the study in 2020 but chose not to publish, later telling Bigtree in an undercover recording that publishing results showing harm could effectively end his career. The revealed data included nearly two thousand unvaccinated children; among them, zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders. The study’s conclusion allegedly states that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination. The film presents a table with 18,468 subjects, including 1,957 fully unvaccinated individuals. When comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups, the vaccinated were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis (4.29x adjusted), about three times the risk for atopic diseases, nearly six times the risk for autoimmune disease, and a five-and-a-half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. It notes almost six times higher risk for autoimmune diseases such as thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, MS, and Guillain–Barré syndrome, and reports sixfold increases in autoimmunity and five and a half times neurodevelopmental issues, along with higher rates of acute and chronic ear infections. Some conditions could not be analyzed because none appeared in the unvaccinated group (zero cases), and the analysis could not be performed with zeros in a group. A highlighted conclusion states that exposure to vaccination is independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition compared to unvaccinated children. A graph reportedly mirrors national data showing 54% of American children with at least one chronic condition; vaccinated children have a 57% chance of developing a chronic disease in the first ten years of life, while unvaccinated children have a 17% chance. Time-to-event analysis reports that, at ten years, the likelihood of being free from a chronic illness is 43% in the vaccinated group versus 83% in the unvaccinated group. The broadcast directs viewers to watch the film at aninconvenientstudy.com or via Vigilant Fox, and notes a downloadable version. It references a press conference in which Donald Trump and RFK Jr. discussed vaccines, Tylenol during pregnancy linked to autism, and argues for more vaccine scrutiny by the administration. The program ends by promoting health resources and offers for Energetic Health Institute programs and related services with discount codes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We recently told you on the broadcast about a new bombshell vaxxed versus unvaxxed study that was about to be released, and it finally has seen the light of day, and the results are truly staggering. This data should shock everyone. So just for a bit of background, in case you missed it the last time we spoke about it, health journalist and film producer Del Bigtree has just released his new film, An Inconvenience Study, which follows Bigtree's years long exchange with doctor Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Health in Detroit, a doctor who is about as pro vaccine as they come. In 2016, doctor Zervos crossed paths with Big Tree who urged him to take on something public health had avoided for decades, a study comparing the health outcomes of vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Doctor Zervos agreed, determined to prove Big Tree and other vaccine skeptics wrong, and at the time, he vowed whatever the results, they get published. Now Vigilant Fox has been kind enough to link the film there, and inconveniencestudy.com is where you can also find it. But let's keep going with this. Before diving into Zervos' findings, the film laid out prior evidence raising serious questions about vaccine safety. One striking example came from doctor Peter Arby. Once a vaccine believer, doctor Arby became a skeptic after discovering that the DTP vaccine he helped promote for African children led to two point three times higher mortality among the vaccinated. Decades after launching the DTP program in Guinea Bissau, doctor Abi realized not only realized only half the children there had received the shot, giving him a perfect comparative study between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. The DTP vaccine did protect against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, but there was also more than a twofold increase in overall mortality. The results stunned the doctor who now speaks openly about what he discovered. Quote, it's important to recognize that no routine vaccine was tested for overall effect on mortality in randomized trials before being introduced. I guess most of you think that we know what our vaccines are doing. We don't, he now teaches. Take a look at this. Speaker 1: The reason this study is important, I think, illustrated by a study that was done in Guinea Bissau, Africa by a man named doctor Peter Abe. He's one of the lead experts. He's pro vaccine, and he develops vaccine programs for the third world. He had a DTP vaccine program he'd run thirty years ago in Guinea Bissau, Africa, and recognized thirty years later, you know what? Only half the children in the country got that vaccine, and the other half didn't. I could do a perfect comparative study between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. And when he did that study, the results blew his mind. Speaker 2: This is about vaccines. And I think it's important to recognize that no routine vaccine was tested for overall effect on mortality in randomized trials before being introduced. I guess most of you think that we know what our vaccines are doing. We don't. The program we are talking about at this time, the vaccine program was introduced sort of in the late seventies after the success with the eradication of smallpox. WHO made sort of the first immunization program for the low income countries. When you comes out here, you had two point three times higher mortality if you are DTP vaccinated. And that is the most commonly used vaccine in the world. So the whooping cough vaccine or the pertussis vaccine was associated with two fold higher mortality. You can have a vaccine which is fully protected against a specific disease, but associated with higher mortality. How is that possible? Speaker 1: After looking at this study, it was clear that the vaccine did protect against the diseases they were vaccinated for. The kids didn't die of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis. Only one problem. Once they looked at it, they were dying at five times the rate of all of these other issues. So it was clear that though it was protecting against these diseases, it was weakening their immune systems to all sorts of other problems. Speaker 0: Absolutely shocking stuff there. Well, the film then turned to doctor Paul Thomas who had his license suspended after publishing this study. Doctor Thomas studied 3,324 children and found that unvaccinated kids had fewer doctor visits and better health outcomes. Here's what his data showed. Fever, 9.1 times higher in the vaccinated. Ear pain, 3.4 times higher. Ear infections, 2.9 times higher, conjunctivitis, two point four times higher, eye disorders, one point eight times, asthma, five point two times, hay fever, six point nine times, sinus issues, 4.3 times higher, breathing issues, 2.9 times higher, anemia, 5.5 times, eczema, 4.5 times, hives, 2.1 times, dermatitis, 1.4 times higher, behavioral issues, 4.1 times higher, gastroenteritis, 4.7 times higher, weight or eating disorders two point five times higher, and ADHD zero cases in the unvaccinated group. But instead of investigating his findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended doctor Thomas's license just days after his study was published. Months later, the study was retracted. Take a listen. Speaker 3: What I noticed in the first decade or so of my practice is kids were getting sicker and sicker. And over the next decade, as more and more patients chose not to vaccinate, I got to see the difference. But I wanted to see, could I prove it? So we got all the data from my practice. We looked at every baby born into my practice and published it in an international journal of public health. What we found, and that study was peer reviewed, it was robust, we found massive increases. I mean, we're talking four hundred to five hundred percent more, allergies, autoimmune conditions, neuro neurodevelopmental issues, and then we had infections of all kinds massively increased in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. What happened when I published that study? Within days of it being available online, get a call from my attorney, don't go see any patients, don't write any prescriptions, don't go into the office. Your license has been emergently suspended. You are a threat to public health. Speaker 2: What's today? Speaker 3: Today is the last time I will be doing clinical medicine in Oregon. Knowing that you guys are keeping it going, the heart of this place lives on. Speaker 0: This really just is an example of how this lie keeps going that vaccines are somehow beneficial for children, and this is why we have such high autism rates. No. I don't believe it's solely Tylenol or that Tylenol is the main culprit because good doctors like this continue to get their licenses suspended, and studies like this continue to get buried. The article goes on this set the stage for the recurring problem behind the vaxxed versus unvaxxed dilemma. These studies weren't rejected for weak data. They were rejected because the data was unwelcome. Time and time again, the findings were dismissed simply because they didn't come from top tier institutions or appear in major medical journals. That reality led Big Tree to recruit doctor Marcus Servos to run such a study. Doctor Zervos was one of the leading infectious disease doctors in the country, and Henry Ford Health was a respected medical center with one of the nation's largest patient databases. Bigtree saw doctor Zervos as the perfect candidate to conduct a large scale vaxxed versus unvaxxed study that could track children over time. He told doctor Zervos that this was his opportunity to prove the anti vaxxers wrong, an angle that convinced him to take on the study. Doctor Zervos agreed, and the study was completed in 2020. As Bigtree anticipated, the results were devastating for the vaccinated. But there was one major problem. Doctor Zervos chose not to publish the study. In 2022, Bigtree convinced doctor Zervos to sit down and explain why. Knowing the importance of the moment, he recorded the conversation on hidden camera. There, doctor Zervos openly admitted on tape why he chose not to publish the data. He said bluntly, quote, publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I'd be finished, end quote. We're gonna play you that secret recording in a moment as well as some of the devastating results. In nearly two thousand unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders. And the study's conclusion, it states in contrast to our expectations. We found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall two point five fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination. Take a listen to this. It's a few minutes, but it's very well worth viewing. Speaker 4: Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I'd be finished. I mean, I'm just curious. What in this data makes you think it will be as catastrophic to your career as you think? Speaker 1: What was he so afraid of? The study was a bombshell. Speaker 5: Eighteen thousand four hundred and sixty eight subjects, one thousand nine hundred and fifty seven of them were fully unvaccinated. When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk vaccinated of several chronic health conditions. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Speaker 4: Four point two nine times in the adjusted. And that seems I've looked at a lot of studies. There's three point two six to five point six five. Speaker 6: They also found three times the risk for atopic diseases. Speaker 5: Which is kind of a subset of allergic diseases. Speaker 6: They found almost six times risk for autoimmune disease. Speaker 3: The autoimmune diseases this paper looked at include thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, MS and Guillain Barre syndrome. They mentioned there are over 80 different autoimmune diseases, and what their data showed for autoimmunity: six times increase in those who got vaccines when compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 5: Which is staggering because autoimmune disorders really represent significant morbidity and health costs and suffering, you know, accrued over a lifetime. Neurodevelopmental disorders Speaker 4: What kind of numbers we talked about? Do you remember? Speaker 6: Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. Speaker 5: We know that the immune system is intimately connected with both brain development and brain functioning. And so when the immune system gets triggered by illness, potentially by vaccination, you can neuropsychiatric symptoms presumably related to brain inflammation and, you know, immune processes in the brain. Speaker 1: 2.92 the amount of motor disabilities. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 3: Three times the rate of developmental delay. They found the same things I found related to allergy and autoimmunity. Also, six times more acute and chronic ear infections. Speaker 5: Interestingly, there were several health conditions where they couldn't even do this analysis because there were none in the unvaccinated group. Speaker 7: The way that the mathematical formulas work, you can't have a zero in any one group and be able to compare risk. For example, there were two hundred and sixty two children who had ADHD in the Speaker 6: vaccinated group. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero cases of ADHD. Zero. Speaker 3: These ones are just mind boggling. These conditions were not found at all in almost two thousand unvaccinated kids. Zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero ticks, and zero other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated. Speaker 8: I'm gonna read the conclusion here. Despite this, in contrast to our expectations again, the the author's expectations was they'd conduct the study and probably find vaccinated people a whole lot healthier than the unvaccinated. Right? This is what we found. We found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5 increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination. Speaker 0: One last highlight from the film we'd really like to show you is a revealing graph that mirrors national data showing fifty four percent of American children have at least one chronic condition. Vaccinated kids, fifty seven percent chance of developing a chronic disease in the first ten years of life, whereas unvaccinated kids, only seventeen percent. In simpler terms, the study showed that children who are vaccinated are more than three times more likely to have a chronic disease than unvaccinated children after a ten year period. That's a result that Big Tree says should shock everyone. Take a listen. Speaker 4: So it's no vaccines versus vaccines. Speaker 7: That's basically your likelihood of not having a chronic health condition. Speaker 5: They did something called time to event analysis. At ten years, the likelihood of being free from a chronic illness was only forty three percent in the vaccinated group versus eighty three percent in the unvaccinated group. It's a big difference. Speaker 4: So if you're unvaccinated, you stay up here above the set you know, like, was it eighty percent of you are gonna be perfectly healthy, whereas you're dropping below the fifty percentile, which is exactly what what I've been stating. I've been saying fifty four percent of America's children have a chronic illness now. Speaker 0: It's right there. Speaker 4: And that that's that's basically what that's showing. Speaker 3: Ten years follow-up. Fifty seven percent of the vaccinated had a chronic health condition in just ten years. That should shock everyone. Speaker 1: Let's remember, the entire conversation of the moment in America is the fact that fifty four percent of our children are chronically ill. And here we are looking at the study, and it's almost exactly those numbers. Fifty seven percent of the vaccinated are chronically ill, whereas only seventeen percent of the unvaccinated. Speaker 0: Vigilant Fox links to the study in the article there, or you can watch the film for yourself at aninconvenientstudy.com. And when you go to that link, you will see down the bottom, there is a download button on the web page. You click it, and you can download it straight to your computer. One of the other things mentioned in the study in the film is obviously the much higher risk of autism amongst children who've been vaccinated versus those who have not. And, unfortunately, in a recent press conference, president Donald Trump and RFK junior, while they did mention vaccines, they focused a lot on the use of Tylenol during pregnancy being linked to autism. We wanna see a lot more on vaccines from this administration because, clearly, there is a very, very clear link to not only autism, but many chronic health conditions as you just saw and childhood vaccines. So in the meantime, we really do encourage everyone to watch that film, share it with everyone, especially expectant parents or parents that think that they should still be trusting this childhood vaccine schedule. Please share the film everywhere and get parents informed on the real risks of vaccinating children. There are things that you can do to keep yourself fit, healthy, and protected in this world where it seems like attacks on our health come from all sides. Take charge of your health with the Energetic Health Institute, giving you the tools to lead a healthier, more balanced life brought to you by doctor Henry Ealy and doctors just like him, true healers and physicians who are making people well successfully outside of big pharma. Visit my ehe aloha.org slash hashtag v fox and join their live conferences, virtual solutions summit, engage in q and a sessions with their first class heart centered professionals, and access all past event replays anytime, anywhere. You can also join the Healing for the Ages community led by doctors Brian Artis, Ed Group, Henry Ely, and Jana Schmidt, and become part of a movement dedicated to building a healthier future where health and healing come first. All of these invaluable resources are a whopping 30% off when you use code v fox. Again, that link is myehialoha.org slash hashtag v fox with promo code v fox for 30% off.
WATCH NOW | An Inconvenient Study An Inconvenient Study: This could change everything. An ICAN Production. aninconvenientstudy.com
Saved - October 15, 2025 at 5:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Indianapolis residents delivered a crushing blow to Big Tech by shutting down a $1B Google data center after fierce public outcry over water use. Locals warned farms would suffer, wells could dry up, and livelihoods hinge on clean water. Records show tech giants enjoy huge tax breaks while states lose hundreds of millions as data centers spread and power bills rise. People are choosing power to the people over Google. Watch the full episode: https://rumble.com/v70b4rq-bombshell-vax-vs.-unvaxx-study-and-50-digital-id-countries-by-2028-daily-pu.html

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

REPORT: In a major win for ordinary Americans, Indianapolis residents just delivered a crushing blow to Big Tech—SHUTTING DOWN a $1 billion Google data center that would’ve drained over a million gallons of water every single day. The 500-acre project collapsed thanks to overwhelming public outcry. Locals packed city hall, warning that Google’s plans would devastate farms, drain their wells, and destroy their way of life. One farmer said losing clean water would mean losing his entire livelihood. Records reveal Google and other tech giants are pocketing massive tax breaks while states lose hundreds of millions each year. From Arizona to Georgia, communities are watching their wells dry up and their power bills soar as data centers spread like wildfire. In Indianapolis, the message is clear: people are done letting Big Tech drain their future. Power to the people—not to Google. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v70b4rq-bombshell-vax-vs.-unvaxx-study-and-50-digital-id-countries-by-2028-daily-pu.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
- Indianapolis residents organized to stop Google's proposed $1,000,000,000 AI data center on a 500-acre site, which reportedly would have used 1,000,000 gallons of water per day. Google withdrew its petition to build, preventing a city council vote. Community members described the victory as “we beat Google,” while warning the fight isn’t over and noting tactics used by a secretive tech company in Saint Charles, Missouri. Residents voiced fears about water supply, contamination, and rising electricity costs, with one farmer stressing the risk to livelihoods if water is unavailable. - The victory was celebrated as a win for community power, though participants cautioned that Google could reappear with a new plan in a few months. The broader context included concerns that big tech seeks data centers in communities, potentially impacting water and energy prices, and the possibility of revisiting projects once opposition fades. - An NPR overview on America’s AI industry highlighted concerns about data centers depleting local water supplies for cooling, driving up electricity bills, and worsening climate change if powered by fossil fuels. The IEA warns climate pollution from power plants serving data centers could more than double by 2035. In the Great Lakes region, water utilities, industry, and power plants draw from a shared resource; questions arise about how much more water the lakes can provide for data centers and associated power needs. - Examples cited include Georgia where residents reported drinking-water problems after a nearby data center was built; Arizona cities restricting water deliveries to high-demand facilities. The Data Center Coalition notes efforts to reduce water use through evaporative cooling versus closed-loop systems; a Google data center in Georgia reportedly uses treated wastewater for cooling and returns it to the Chattahoochee River. There is a push toward waterless cooling, with a balancing act described: more electricity to cool means less water, and vice versa. - Rising electricity bills are a major concern as data centers increase power demand. A UCS analysis found that in 2024, homes and businesses in several states faced $4.3 billion in additional costs from transmission projects needed to deliver power to data centers. The dialogue includes questioning why centers aren’t built along coastlines where desalination could be used at the companies’ own expense, arguing inland siting imposes greater resource strain on residents. - Financial concerns extend to tax incentives for data centers. GoodJobsFirst.org reports that at least 10 states lose more than $100,000,000 annually in tax revenue to data centers; Texas revised its cost projection for 2025 from $130,000,000 to $1,000,000,000 within 23 months. The group calls for canceling data center tax exemption programs, capping exemptions, pausing programs, and robust public disclosure. - The narrative concludes with a call to resist placing data centers in established communities, urging organized action and advocating for desalination and energy infrastructure funded by the data centers themselves. A personal anecdote about Rick Hill’s cancer recovery via Laotryl B17 and enzyme therapies is tied to a promotional plug: rncstore.com/pages/ricksbundle, discount code pulse for 10% off, promoting Laotryl B17 and related detox/purity kits.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, we have a good news story for you all today. Indianapolis residents have shut down a proposed $1,000,000,000 Google data center that reportedly would have used 1,000,000 gallons of water per day. Google was set to build what we're being told was a 500 acre site, but citizens organized and stopped it. Take a listen to this video documenting their success. Speaker 1: I'd like to announce, our intention to withdraw this proposal. I'm in Indianapolis where Google just pulled down their petition to build an AI data center, preventing the city council from voting on whether to advance the project. Speaker 2: We beat Google. For a long time, it felt like we were four people with cardboard swords fighting a monster. But tonight, it shows that people power still rings. Speaker 3: This was do or die. We came prepared to fight with everything we have against this data center because if they voted it out, that was it. Speaker 2: It feels like I'm not going to have my livelihood destroyed. We farm three acres. So if there's no water or water contamination, I don't have a business. Speaker 1: Residents remain cautiously optimistic, but it's clear that the fight is far from over. This is the same tactic that a secretive tech company used in Saint Charles, Missouri, which pulled down their application in the hopes of returning to the community when opposition fades away. Speaker 3: I don't trust Google for one second. We've been told before that if they withdraw on their own, then they can come back in three months. Speaker 4: Now we got, again, big tech coming in saying this is a perfect place for for data centers, but they forgot to ask Hoosiers. And Hoosiers are saying no. All my Hoosiers, I love y'all. Keep fighting. Speaker 1: This is yet another rejection of big tech secretly inserting themselves into a community, threatening its water supply and electricity costs. Well, this story isn't over. Indianapolis residents halted Google's plans, and that alone is worth celebrating. Speaker 5: My six years on the council, I've never seen all the rooms filled to the max with people waiting in the lobby. I'm overjoyed by the amount of community support that came out Speaker 2: for this. In a world where we are constantly being divided, everyone showed up tonight with a common goal and we won. Speaker 4: I've been, like, hoping that something would bring us together and it looks like data centers are. For the people. Speaker 0: Power for the people, not for Google. It already has far too much power. Wanna show you something from an article from NPR now. Again, yes, it's NPR, but there are some really important facts included in this article, which is about America's AI industry. Says, but people are also concerned about data centers depleting local water supplies for their cooling systems, driving up electricity bills, and worsening climate change. If the facilities rely on fossil fuel power plants for the electricity they need. The IEA says climate pollution from the power plants that run data centers would more than double or could more than double rather by 2035. Now apart from the climate change nonsense here, let's think about the actual impact on these communities as far as their power bills go and water consumption. It says consider what's happening around the Great Lakes where Scanlan of the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee says there's a flurry of data center activity. The Great Lakes can be thought of as a giant pitcher of water with straws going into it from water utilities, business, and power plants in eight states and two Canadian provinces, Scanlan says. The question is, how much more water can the lakes provide for data centers and the power plants needed to run them in the coming years? Well, in Georgia, some residents reported problems getting drinking water from their wells after a data center was built nearby. And in Arizona, some cities have restricted water deliveries to facilities that use a lot of water, including data centers. Dan DiOrio, vice president of state policy at the Data Center Coalition and Industry Group, says companies have been working to reduce how much water their facilities consume. While some data centers use evaporative cooling systems in which water is lost as steam, others rely on closed loop systems that use less water. A Google data center in Georgia uses treated wastewater for cooling and then returns it to the Chattahoochee River, DiOrio said. And there's a push for waterless cooling systems. Quote, it's a balance between water and electricity, DiOrio says. If you use more electricity to cool, you're gonna use less water. If you use more water, you'll use less electricity. But rising electricity bills are also a major concern as data centers spike power demand in certain areas. An analysis by the Union of Concerned Scientists recently found that in 2024, homes and businesses in Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia faced $4,300,000,000 in additional costs from transmission projects that were needed to deliver power to data centers. Now we've asked this question before, but, again, I'd like to know why they keep building in the middle of the country rather than on the coastlines where they could set up at their own expense desalination and use that for cooling. Why do they keep heading into communities where this causes this immense additional strain on resources, driving up electricity costs for residents, and causing water scarcity? Imagine spending. What does it cost now? Well, in excess of $25,000 to build a well on your property only to find you don't have water for your family to drink because Google or some other billionaire tech giant company is draining it all. That is completely unacceptable. And mind you, they're doing this all while getting huge tax exemptions on top of it all. Take a look at this page from goodjobsfirst.org posted on April 2025, cloudy with a loss of spending control, how data centers are endangering state budgets. It says at least 10 states already lose more than $100,000,000 per year in tax revenue to data centers, the cloud computing warehouses that were proliferating before artificial intelligence greatly accelerated their growth. The industry's high velocity growth combined with the virtually automatic structure of the state tax exemptions is preventing states from making accurate cost projections. For example, in the space of just twenty three months, Texas revised its financial year 2025 cost projection from a 130,000,000 to $1,000,000,000. The loss of state spending control is surely worse than we can yet document. Of the 32 states with tax incentives to data centers, 12 failed to disclose even aggregate revenue losses. We recommend that states cancel data center tax exemption programs immediately. Shy of that, states should amend enabling legislation to cap how much in taxes any facility and any company can avoid each year and how much revenue the program can abate each year. Short of cancellation or capping, we recommend that states pause these programs and study their impact on state and local budgets. And for every state, no matter how its program works, as always, we urge robust public disclosure. Now considering the agenda behind this huge increase in data centers, which we will cover in the next segment, Personally, I see more negative outcomes than positives there. There's already cause for concern. But even putting that aside, just considering the immediate effects, which is the flow on effects for residents, they should not be going up in residential areas and established communities. Again, go and set up your data centers, mister billionaire in a coastline. Organize desalination and energy at your own expense. You make plenty of money. Residents who have worked their whole lives to live in peace should not be footing your bills or suffering so you can build your AI dystopia. Not today, Google. And the residents of Indianapolis are smart. They've already figured out that Google will likely try again in a few months. But the difference is communities are aware of their tactics, and they are coming together to defeat these big tech giants, and that is a win for humanity. Imagine being in your twenties, newly married, and given just sixty days to live by the Mayo Clinic after a grueling cancer diagnosis. That was Rick Hill's reality in 1975 until a letter led him to a Tijuana clinic. There, he embraced Laotryl B seventeen supplements, enzyme therapies, a raw organic diet, and detox protocols. Within just three weeks, Rick was off morphine, gaining strength, and today, in his seventies, he's been cancer free for fifty years. His story featured on The Daily Pulse proves the power of natural alternatives. Now thousands have followed suit. Richardson Nutritional Center's Laotryl b seventeen and enzyme therapies paired with organic produce kits and detox support from trusted retailers are transforming lives. Rick reports even people who are suffering from the shots are achieving the same results he did. To use the same protocol that saved Rick Hill's life and receive a free copy of his book, go to rncstore.com/pages/ricksbundle and use the discount code pulse for an additional 10% off your first order. That link again is rncstore.com/pages/ricksbundle, and remember to use discount code pulse for an additional 10% off your first order.
Saved - October 15, 2025 at 2:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that in 1964 the Gulf of Tonkin incident duped the world, drawing the U.S. deeper into the Vietnam War. On August 2, US forces confronted near North Vietnamese waters, prompting retaliation. The US government then claimed a second incident on August 4, later shown to never have happened, based largely on misread intercepts. The clip is from Propaganda Exposed; sign up at http://propaganda-exposed.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

In 1964, the world was duped by the Gulf of Tonkin incident, an international confrontation that led the United States to engage more directly in the Vietnam War. On August 2, 1964, a confrontation erupted as US forces conducted covert operations near the edgy brink of North Vietnamese territorial waters, prompting an immediate response from North Vietnamese military units. The United States government falsely claimed that a second incident occurred on August 4, 1964, between North Vietnamese and United States ships in the waters of the Gulf of Tonkin. Originally, the US military blamed Vietnam for the confrontations. Later investigation revealed that the second attack never happened; the official American claim is that it was based mostly on erroneously interpreted communications intercepts. The above clip is from a new docuseries called Propaganda Exposed. Click the link below to obtain free access to the series, which is available now. SIGN UP HERE: http://propaganda-exposed.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and preserve the core events and timeline related to the Gulf of Tonkin claims. - Capture each speaker’s key statements without adding interpretation or judgments. - Retain dates, specific actions, and named entities (LBJ, Maddox, Gulf Of Tonkin Resolution, McNamara, NSA). - Include both the initial incident claims and the later counterclaims or refutations as presented. - Exclude repetition and filler, focusing on essential facts and conclusions. - Translate if needed and present all claims as stated, without evaluative commentary. On August 4, 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson reported renewed hostile actions against United States ships on the high seas in the Gulf of Tonkin and said he was ordering the military forces of the United States to take action in reply. He cited the initial attack on the destroyer Maddox on August 2, and stated it was repeated today by a number of hostile vessels attacking two US destroyers with torpedoes. These two alleged attacks on US destroyers with torpedoes on August 4, 1964 were the reason that LBJ ordered the military to take action in reply and led him to signing the Gulf Of Tonkin Resolution. America had officially entered the Vietnam War. In August '64, it was alleged, that Americans were attacked in the Gulf Of Tonkin, in Vietnam, which led not only to much heavier funding of Vietnam War, but also fueled the reelection of Lyndon Johnson. In his memoirs, secretary of defense Robert McNamara, decades later, would admit that that was entirely false. It was just confusion, and events afterwards showed that our judgment that we've been attacked that day was wrong. United States officials had lied about The NSA released over 200 declassified documents and tapes in the early 2000s, which proved that there were no attacks on 08/04/1964.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you ever heard of the Gulf Of Tonkin? Here's President LBJ on 08/04/1964. Speaker 1: My fellow Americans, as President and Commander in Chief, it is my duty to the American people to report that renewed hostile actions against United States ships on the high seas in the Gulf Of Tonkin have today required me to order the military forces of The United States to take action in reply. The initial attack on the destroyer Maddox on August 2 was repeated today by a number of hostile vessels attacking two US destroyers with torpedoes. Speaker 0: These two alleged attacks on US destroyers with torpedoes on 08/04/1964 were the reason that LBJ ordered the military to take action in reply and led him to signing the Gulf Of Tonkin Resolution. America had officially entered the Vietnam War. Speaker 2: In August '64, it was alleged, that the, that Americans were attacked in the Gulf Of Tonkin, in Vietnam, which led not only to much heavier funding of Vietnam War, but also fueled the reelection of Lyndon Johnson. In his memoirs, secretary of defense Robert McNamara, decades later, would admit that that was entirely false. Speaker 3: It was just confusion, and events afterwards showed that our judgment that we've been attacked that day was wrong. It didn't happen. Speaker 0: United States officials had lied about The NSA released over 200 declassified documents and tapes in the early 2000s, which proved that there were no attacks on 08/04/1964.
Propaganda EXPOSED! [UNCENSORED] Starts Nov 13 The Truth About Health Freedom & Big Pharma go.propaganda-exposed.com
Saved - October 13, 2025 at 10:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was a healthy 13-year-old who loved dirt bikes. After the HPV shot I grew nauseous, then flopped paralyzed by transverse myelitis and needed a tracheostomy. I couldn’t play sports anymore. In 2018 I took my own life, believing I burdened my family. Some spread fear about vaccines, but this is the heartbreak and reality that can follow.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

This teenage boy loved to ride dirt bikes… until he was paralyzed by the HPV vaccine. 13-year-old Colton Berrett was healthy and full of life. But the day he got the HPV shot, he came home nauseous with a sore neck and stayed in bed. That evening, when he sat up to take a drink of water, “he just flopped back and his head just hit the pillow.” His mom asked, “Colton, are you going paralyzed?” He was rushed to Primary Children’s Hospital in Salt Lake City, where doctors diagnosed him with transverse myelitis. He later needed a tracheostomy just to breathe. “It does suck not being able to play sports anymore,” Colton said at the time. “You gotta do your research. You can’t just trust a doctor anymore.” In 2018, Colton took his own life, believing he had become too much of a burden on his family. While media fearmongers about paralytic polio making a resurgence if people stop vaccinating, the heartbreaking irony is that vaccines are actively paralyzing people. It’s a devastating reality most people don’t realize until it happens to their own child. Clip from the film: http://aninconvenientstudy.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
Colton was a 13 year old healthy strong boy. The doctor says, hey, he's the age that you should get the HPV vaccine. So he was administered the vaccine. This box hung on his side, breathing for him through a hole in his throat. 'Colton, are you going paralyzed?' They took him to Primary Children's Hospital in Salt Lake. Original diagnosis was transverse myelitis. He had the HPV vaccine on February 1, and they went, oh, well, we'll be reporting that to bars. Not being able to play sports anymore. You gotta do your research. Do your own ways to find out what's best for you. Unfortunately, Colton ended up taking his life in 2018 because he believed he'd become too much of a burden on his family. He was paralyzed by the Gardasil HPV vaccine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Colton was a 13 year old healthy strong boy. He loved anything that has to do with an adrenaline rush. Motorcross was his passion. The doctor says, hey, he's the age that you should get the HPV vaccine. I said, okay. So he was administered the vaccine. And then this is the last day he got to ride that big boy bike. And that day he came home, he was starting to feel nauseous, really sore neck. He still didn't want to get out of bed. I just thought, man, you're just really weak and exhausted. And that evening, when he sat up to take a drink of water, he just flopped back and his head just hit the pillow and I went, Colton, are you going paralyzed? They immediately took him down to Primary Children's Hospital in Salt Lake. Original diagnosis was transverse myelitis. When the doctor came out and asked me, has he been sick? I said, no. He hasn't been sick. He had the HPV vaccine on February 1, and they went, oh, well, we'll be reporting that to bars. It does suck, Speaker 1: like, not being able to play sports anymore. Now I have to sit on the sideline, just watch everybody. You gotta do your research. Like, you don't you can't just trust a doctor anymore. Speaker 2: Do your own ways to find out what's best for you. Speaker 3: Unfortunately, Colton ended up taking his life in 2018 because he believed he'd become too much of a burden on his family. But the thing I remember about standing there and watching that interview taking place, my co producer, Polly Tommy, was doing the interview, was this box that was hanging on his side that was breathing for him. And it went through a tube that was going through a hole in his throat. And he literally had to wait for it to fill his lungs with air before he could answer a question. So he'd go And then he would start answering the question until he ran out of air. I thought about all of the people that accused these so called anti vaxxers of bringing back polio or the iron lung. Speaker 4: Once vaccination rates fall, you're gonna have a lot of people getting sick and a lot of children paralyzed for the rest Speaker 3: of their life with polio. I thought, he's wearing an iron lung. You're not laying in a metal tube anymore. They've reduced it down to a box that hangs on your side and a hose that goes to your throat. But in this case, he wasn't paralyzed because he had polio. He wasn't paralyzed because he didn't vaccinate. He was paralyzed by the Gardasil HPV vaccine.
WATCH NOW | An Inconvenient Study An Inconvenient Study: This could change everything. An ICAN Production. aninconvenientstudy.com
Saved - October 13, 2025 at 7:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recount that Dr. Marcus Zervos’s shelved study reportedly found vaccinated children at higher risk for many conditions: asthma 4.29x, atopic diseases 3x, autoimmune nearly 6x, neurodevelopmental 5.5x, motor 2.9x, speech 4.5x, developmental delays 3x, and ear infections 6x. Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated kids there were zero ADHD, diabetes, behavioral or learning issues. The conclusion allegedly states a 2.5-fold higher likelihood of a chronic condition with vaccination.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Bombshell vax vs. unvax study finally sees the light of day — and the results are staggering. Dr. Marcus Zervos led the study, but he decided not to publish it because “publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” Here’s what the study revealed: • Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma. • Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema). • Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders — a category that includes over 80 different diseases. • 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. • 2.9 times more motor disabilities. • 4.5 times more speech disorders. • Three times more developmental delays. • Six times more acute and chronic ear infections. • In nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were ZERO cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders. • The study’s conclusion is devastating. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
- "Eighteen thousand four hundred and sixty eight subjects, one thousand nine hundred fifty seven of them were fully unvaccinated." - "When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions." - "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." - "They found a almost six times risk for autoimmune disease." - "Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders." - "Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities." - "We found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall two point five fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I'd be finished. Speaker 1: I mean, I'm just curious. You see What in this data makes you think it will be as catastrophic to your career as you think. Speaker 2: What was he so afraid of? The study was a bombshell. Speaker 3: Eighteen thousand four hundred and sixty eight subjects, one thousand nine hundred and fifty seven of them were fully unvaccinated. When comparing the health outcomes of the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated, they found an increased risk in the vaccinated of several chronic health conditions. The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. Speaker 1: Four point two nine times in the adjusted. And that seems I've looked at a lot of studies. There's three point two six to five point six five. Speaker 4: They also found three times the risk for atopic diseases. Speaker 3: Which is kind of a subset of allergic diseases. Speaker 4: They found a almost six times risk for autoimmune disease. Speaker 5: The autoimmune diseases this paper looked at include thrombocytopenic purpura, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus, MS, multiple sclerosis, and Guillain Barre syndrome. They mentioned there are over 80 different autoimmune disease, and what their data showed for autoimmunity, six times increase in those who got vaccines when compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 3: Which is staggering because autoimmune disorders really represent significant morbidity and health costs and suffering, you know, accrued over a lifetime. Neurodevelopmental disorders What Speaker 1: kind of numbers are we talking about? Do you remember? Speaker 4: Five and a half times risk for neurodevelopmental disorders. Speaker 3: We know that the immune system is intimately connected with both brain development and brain functioning. And so when the immune system gets triggered by illness, potentially by vaccination, you can get neuropsychiatric symptoms presumably related to brain inflammation and, you know, immune processes in the brain. Speaker 2: Two point nine two times the amount of motor disabilities. Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Speaker 5: Three times the rate of developmental delay. They found the same things I found related to allergy and autoimmunity. Also, six times more acute and chronic ear infections. Speaker 3: Interestingly, there were several health conditions where they couldn't even do this analysis because there were none in the unvaccinated group. The way that the mathematical formulas work, you can't have a zero in any one group and be able to compare risk. Speaker 4: For example, there were two hundred and sixty two children who had ADHD in the Speaker 5: vaccinated group. Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero cases of ADHD. Zero. These ones are just mind boggling. These conditions were not found at all in almost two thousand unvaccinated kids. Zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero ticks, and zero other psychological disabilities in the unvaccinated. Speaker 6: I'm gonna read the conclusion here. Despite this, and in contrast to our expectations again, the the author's expectations was they'd conduct the study and probably find vaccinated people a whole lot healthier than the unvaccinated. Right? This is what we found. We found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall two point five fold increase in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.
Saved - October 13, 2025 at 7:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Dr. Paul Thomas studied 3,324 children and found unvaccinated kids had fewer doctor visits and better health. The data allegedly show higher rates for fever, ear pain, infections, asthma, allergies, GI issues, behavior problems, and ADHD (0 cases in unvaccinated). The Oregon Medical Board suspended his license after publication, and the study was later retracted. The pattern is that other doctors faced similar punishment for publishing vaccine-comparison findings; I ask why.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

He proved unvaccinated kids were healthier. They revoked his license. Dr. Paul Thomas studied 3,324 children and found unvaccinated kids had FEWER doctor visits and BETTER health outcomes. Here’s what his data showed: Fever – 9.1× higher in vaccinated Ear Pain – 3.4× higher Otitis Media (Ear Infections) – 2.9× higher Conjunctivitis – 2.4× higher Eye Disorders (Other) – 1.8× higher Asthma – 5.2× higher Allergic Rhinitis (Hay Fever) – 6.9× higher Sinusitis – 4.3× higher Breathing Issues – 2.9× higher Anemia – 5.5× higher Eczema – 4.5× higher Urticaria (Hives) – 2.1× higher Dermatitis – 1.4× higher Behavioral Issues – 4.1× higher Gastroenteritis – 4.7× higher Weight/Eating Disorders – 2.5× higher ADHD – 0 cases in unvaccinated group *Data based on how often children visited the doctor for each condition* Instead of investigating the findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas’s license—just days after the study was published. Months later, the study was retracted. Dr. Paul Thomas isn’t the only one who faced swift punishment for publishing inconvenient science. Other doctors have faced similar consequences for exposing the same pattern. The question is: Why are doctors being punished simply for comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Early in practice, I saw kids get sicker; over the next decade, as more patients chose not to vaccinate, I sought to prove it. We got all the data from my practice and published it in an international journal of public health. What we found and that study was peer reviewed. It was robust. We found massive increases. I mean, we're talking four to five hundred percent more. Allergies, autoimmune conditions, neurodevelopmental issues, and then we had infections of all kinds, massively increased in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. What happened when I published that study? Within days of it being available online, I get a call from my attorney. Don't go see any patients. Don't write any prescriptions. Don't go into the office. Your license has been emergently suspended. You are a threat to public health. What's today? Today is the last time I will be doing clinical medicine in Oregon. Knowing that you guys are keeping it going, the heart of this place lives on.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What I noticed in the first decade or so of my practice is kids were getting sicker and sicker. And over the next decade, as more and more patients chose not to vaccinate, I got to see the difference. But I wanted to see, could I prove it? So we got all the data from my practice. We looked at every baby born into my practice and published it in an international journal of public health. What we found and that study was peer reviewed. It was robust. We found massive increases. I mean, we're talking four to five hundred percent more. Allergies, autoimmune conditions, neurodevelopmental issues, and then we had infections of all kinds, massively increased in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. What happened when I published that study? Within days of it being available online, I get a call from my attorney. Don't go see any patients. Don't write any prescriptions. Don't go into the office. Your license has been emergently suspended. You are a threat to public health. What's today? Today is the last time I will be doing clinical medicine in Oregon. Knowing that you guys are keeping it going, the heart of this place lives on.
Saved - October 13, 2025 at 7:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was a pro-vaccine doctor who, after conducting a Guinea-Bissau study, found that while DTP protected against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, it was associated with more than a twofold increase in overall mortality. With only half the children vaccinated, I got a perfect vaccinated vs. unvaccinated comparison. The results changed me forever, and I now teach that no routine vaccine was tested for overall mortality in randomized trials before use.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Pro-vaccine doctor turns skeptic after discovering that the DTP vaccine he pushed on African children led to 2.3 times HIGHER mortality among the vaccinated. He ran the study himself, and the results changed his perspective on vaccines forever. Decades after launching a DTP program in Guinea-Bissau, Dr. Peter Aaby realized only half the children there had received the DTP shot. This gave him the opportunity to run a perfect comparative study between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. The DTP vaccine did protect against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, but there was also more than a twofold INCREASE in overall mortality. The results blew Dr. Aaby’s mind so much that he now speaks openly about what he discovered. “It’s important to recognize that no routine vaccine was tested for overall effect on mortality in randomized trials before being introduced. I guess most of you think that we know what our vaccines are doing. We don’t,” he now teaches. Clip from the film: http://aninconvenientstudy.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Only half the children in the country got that vaccine, and the other half didn't." "no routine vaccine was tested for overall effect on mortality in randomized trials before being introduced." "The program we are talking about at this time, the vaccine program, was introduced sort of in the late seventies after the success with the eradication of smallpox." "When you come out here, you had two point three times higher mortality if you were DTP vaccinated." "So the moving cough vaccine or the pertussis vaccine was associated with two fold higher mortality." "You can have a vaccine which is fully protected against a specific disease, but associated with higher mortality." "Once they looked at it, they were dying at 5x the rate of all of these other issues."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The reason this study is important, I think, is illustrated by a study that was done in Guinea Bissau, Africa by a man named doctor Peter Abe. He's one of the lead experts. He's pro vaccine, and he develops vaccine programs for the third world. He had a DTP vaccine program he'd run thirty years ago in Guinea Bissau, Africa, and recognized thirty years later, you know what? Only half the children in the country got that vaccine, and the other half didn't. I could do a perfect comparative study between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. And when he did that study, the results blew his mind. Speaker 1: This is about vaccines. And I think it's important to recognize that no routine vaccine was tested for overall effect on mortality in randomized trials before being introduced. I guess most of you think that we know what our vaccines are doing. We don't. The program we are talking about at this time, the vaccine program, was introduced sort of in the late seventies after the success with the eradication of smallpox. WHO made sort of the first immunization program for the low income countries. When you come out here, you had two point three times higher mortality if you were DTP vaccinated. And that is the most commonly used vaccine in the world. So the moving cough vaccine or the pertussis vaccine was associated with two fold higher mortality. You can have a vaccine which is fully protected against a specific disease, but associated with higher mortality. How is that possible? Speaker 0: After looking at this study, it was clear that the vaccine did protect against the diseases they were vaccinated for. The kids didn't die of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis. Only one problem. Once they looked at it, they were dying at 5x the rate of all of these other issues. So it was clear that though it was protecting against these diseases, it was weakening their immune systems to all sorts of other problems.
WATCH NOW | An Inconvenient Study An Inconvenient Study: This could change everything. An ICAN Production. aninconvenientstudy.com
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 2:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The reality of organ transplants is far more troubling than most realize. Investigations reveal that nearly 30% of organ donors showed signs of life during harvesting, raising ethical concerns about the definition of death, which was altered decades ago. Corruption and exploitation in the organ trade are rampant, with significant financial incentives leading to black market activities. Additionally, recipients may experience emotional and personality changes linked to their donors. The medical community must address these profound issues and explore alternatives to organ harvesting.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The truth about organ transplants is worse than anyone imagined. Millions sign up as organ donors, never imagining the system could betray them. But federal investigators found nearly 30% of ANR donors showed signs of life, as surgeons prepared to harvest their organs. Nurses say some organ donors are sedated or even paralyzed just so the organ harvesting procedures can continue. Even more disturbing, the definition of “death” was re-engineered decades ago to make this nightmare possible. This is what no one tells you about being an organ donor—and what really happens when someone receives an organ. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-unseen-cost-of-organ-transplants

The Unseen Cost of Organ Transplants: Ethical Issues and Spiritual Implications Exploring the Ambiguity of Brain Death, the Ethics of Organ Harvesting, and the Mysterious Transference of Consciousness midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

In case you missed it, @MidwesternDoc released one of the most shocking reports yet. Yes, organ transplants save lives—but the system is absolutely riddled with corruption, misdiagnosed “brain death,” and multiple cases of patients showing signs of life as their organs were about to be harvested. This is nothing short of disturbing.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The organ trade (yes, that’s a thing) is worth billions, and a single transplant can cost nearly $2 million. Whenever we’re dealing with that kind of money, exploitation always follows. Always. Investigations estimate 5–20% of kidney transplants worldwide come from black markets—often at the expense of the poor or the imprisoned.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

One of the most disturbing revelations: the definition of death was deliberately re-engineered to make organ harvesting easier. In 1968, Harvard created the term “brain death.” Not because science proved it was a thing, but because it allowed doctors to legally harvest viable organs from people whose hearts were still beating. A beating hard is necessary for keeping organs alive and healthy for transplantation.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Since then, countless patients who were diagnosed as brain dead have later revived. This has even happened moments before their organs were to be removed for transplantation. This isn’t just a conspiracy or a once in a million occurrence. This is happening to real people, some of whom have survived to tell their story. Colleen Burns woke up on the operating table. Jahi McMath was written off as dead but showed brainwaves and purposeful movement months later.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

One of the most incredible cases of something called “Locked-in syndrome” happened to a 12-year-old boy named Martin. Locked-in syndrome is when someone is still conscious but has lost all control of their body and all ability to communicate. Hence the term “locked-in—they’re literally trapped inside their own body. Martin was left in a vegetative state after a bout with meningitis. He was eventually sent home where his parents waited for him to die. But he didn’t. Four years later, Martin began to regain consciousness. By the age of 19 he was aware of everything around him, and at 26, a caregiver discovered signs that he was indeed aware. Eventually, Martin recovered enough to get married.

Video Transcript AI Summary
NBC News exclusive: the first American TV interview with a man who lived essentially trapped inside his own body for about a decade—he could see and hear everything around him, but he couldn't talk or move. Doctors told his parents he couldn't understand the world around him, but that changed when someone realized he was in there. Martin Pastorius, who fell ill at 12 in South Africa, says he was awake and unseen for nearly ten years. He now communicates by typing into a computer that voices his words: "You must have overheard so many conversations." He recalls abuse in care centers, though most caregivers were good; a therapist noticed a glimmer ten years in. He went to college, learned to drive, and married Jonah in 2008. His book Ghost Boy is a New York Times bestseller, and his message: "don't overlook what's possible" and to "treat everyone with kindness, dignity, compassion, and respect..."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Back now with an NBC News exclusive tonight. The first American TV interview with a man who lived essentially trapped inside his own body for about a decade of his life. He could see and hear everything around him, but he couldn't talk. And he couldn't control his body movements. Doctors told his parents he couldn't understand the world going on around him, but that all changed one day when someone finally realized he was in there, then started the effort to unlock the man inside. We get his story tonight from NBC's Kate Snow. Speaker 1: To look at Martin Pastorius now, you'd never know what he's been through. He was a healthy 12 year old growing up in South Africa when he went home sick from school one day. Speaker 2: He never ever got better. Speaker 1: His body weakened. He lost control of his muscles, stopped communicating. Doctors believed it was a neurodegenerative disease and told his parents he was unaware of the world around him. But that was wrong. For nearly a decade, he says he was awake, but no one noticed. Speaker 3: For some many years, I was like a ghost. It was like I wasn't there. I was invisible. Speaker 1: This is Martin today. This is how you communicate now? Speaker 3: Yes. Speaker 1: He speaks by typing into a computer that voices his words. Because that takes time, we gave him some of our questions in advance. You must have overheard so many conversations. Speaker 3: Yes. Many times. You get to see and hear things that you probably never would. Things like what people really think and how they really are when nobody is watching. Speaker 1: Like one night when he heard his mom in a moment of despair. Speaker 2: I said to him one day, I hope you die. And I had no idea that he understood that. And I'm very, very sorry I said it. Speaker 3: While I was very sad and upset by what she said, I understood where that was coming from. My mother often felt that she wasn't a good mom, and one of the hardest things for me was I couldn't tell her that. No. You are doing great. She is a good mother. Speaker 1: Martin lived at home with his parents, but was regularly in care centers where he says at times he was subjected to abuse, verbal, physical, and sexual. Speaker 3: There was never a care home that I was in where there wasn't some degree of abuse. Even if it didn't happen to me, I witnessed it happening to others. Speaker 1: But he says most of his caregivers were good people, like the therapist who noticed a glimmer in Martin's eye ten years into his illness. Tess revealed he could communicate. Speaker 3: I remember feeling happy, like, wow, But also thinking to myself, what next? Speaker 1: As your mind grew stronger, did your body also get stronger? Speaker 3: Yes. My body slower got stronger too. It took a massive amount of work, blood, sweat, and tears, literally over many years. Speaker 1: He went to college, even learned to drive using an adapted car. And in 02/2008, he met a friend of his sisters, Jonah. Speaker 2: I just thought it's really attractive. Speaker 1: They got married five years ago. Martin, it sounds almost like a love at first sight kind of story. Speaker 3: Yes. I think it was. It is hard to explain, but you just know. I had heard people say that I'd always thought, yeah, right, until it happened to me. Speaker 1: His message now, don't overlook what's possible. Speaker 3: Treat everyone with kindness, dignity, compassion, and respect whether or not you think they understand or not, to never underestimate the power of the mind, the importance of love and faith, and to never stop dreaming. Speaker 1: Martin is a man who appreciates every joy in life. His book Ghost Boy is now on the New York Times bestseller list, Brian. Speaker 0: What an incredible story and what a message there at the end about how to treat other people.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Despite the fact that brain death is not straightforward and significant variations (like not actually being brain dead) are not as rare as they would like to admit, the New York Times recently argued that the definition of death should be broadened even more to meet the increasing organ demand. They want to redefine what life means until the organ supply matches the system’s needs.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Want the full report with cases and documentation? It’s all available in @MidwesternDoc's article: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-unseen-cost-of-organ-transplants

The Unseen Cost of Organ Transplants: Ethical Issues and Spiritual Implications Exploring the Ambiguity of Brain Death, the Ethics of Organ Harvesting, and the Mysterious Transference of Consciousness midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Investigations into the U.S. organ procurement system (OPTN) have confirmed the worst: widespread corruption and dysfunction. Congress found 80% of eligible organs are never even collected, whistleblowers are retaliated against, and families are misled and gaslit in moments of crisis.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

A federal review revealed an absolutely chilling statistic. Nearly 30% of authorized but not recovered cases showed signs of consciousness during the organ harvesting process. Patients were crying, moving, and even mouthing “help me.” Some brave surgeons have refused to operate while coordinators pressured them to continue the harvesting process despite obvious signs of life.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Nurses have testified that patients were sedated, and sometimes even purposefully paralyzed, to push forward organ harvesting procedures. One ICU nurse: “All they care about is getting organs. They’re so aggressive. It’s sickening.” This isn’t medical care—it’s straight out of a horror movie.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Even when transplants succeed, outcomes are often grim. Organ transplant isn’t easy. Within 10 years, nearly half of kidney and heart grafts fail. In an effort to achieve success, patients are forced to take toxic immune-suppressing drugs for life, costing $10,000–$30,000 a year. Unsurprisingly, these drugs can come with severe side effects. Survival comes at a steep price.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

If this didn’t sound horrific enough, the COVID era added new layers of cruelty. Around the world, unvaccinated patients were denied transplants. Some complied—only to suffer organ rejection soon after the shot. Others were told by their doctors that they were not eligible for the vaccine, due to their frailty—but that didn’t matter. And guess what? Reports now link mRNA vaccines to graft failures in kidneys, livers, corneas, and hearts.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The deeper you look, the darker it gets. @MidwesternDoc's full report is a must-read. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-unseen-cost-of-organ-transplants

The Unseen Cost of Organ Transplants: Ethical Issues and Spiritual Implications Exploring the Ambiguity of Brain Death, the Ethics of Organ Harvesting, and the Mysterious Transference of Consciousness midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

An often unacknowledged feature of organ transplants is that they often transfer memories, emotions, even personality traits from donor to recipient. Cases document recipients developing new cravings, habits, or even dreams reflecting their donor’s final moments. Science can’t explain it. But it happens.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Paul Pearsall’s research in this phenomenon, The Heart’s Code, details dozens of these cases. One woman craved beer and chicken nuggets—her donor’s favorites. A child dreamed vividly of her donor’s murder and later helped police identify the killer. Sounds unbelievable, doesn’t it? If true, what happens in the final moments before organs are removed is significant and must be considered.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A heart transplant is life changing; some recipients report memories and tastes from their donor. "I absolutely do not believe for a second that a heart is just a pump." "I was convinced that I was living with the presence of another within me." "It's like two people in one body." Researchers Pearsall and Schwartz examine donor memories and "feedback memory" theories, publishing cases where a donor's heart influenced a recipient's tastes. "Memory itself is what's called distributed, distributed process." HeartMath finds the heart is "the most accurate part of our body that reflects how we're feeling" and "the largest generator of electromagnetic signals in the body." They ask whether the heart could have its own intelligence and what this means for memory and transplant recipients.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A heart transplant is a life changing event. Speaker 1: The world is now my oyster from the bottom to the top. Speaker 0: But for a few, it brings much more. Speaker 2: I absolutely do not believe for a second that a heart is just a pump. Speaker 3: Little by little, many things started happening. Speaker 2: I was more of an Italian food fan, but I love Mexican food now. Speaker 3: Suddenly, green peppers, putting them in my food. I used to take them out. Speaker 4: I just was writing and writing and writing. Speaker 2: I didn't have a clue where it was coming from. Speaker 3: I was convinced that I was living with the presence of another within me. Speaker 1: It's like two people in one body. Speaker 0: Is it possible that a new heart could bring with it the memories of a donor? Speaker 5: This idea of a sentient, remembering, connecting heart is one of the most radical scientific concepts to come along in a very long time and it changes everything. Speaker 0: With strict codes of confidentiality in place at the hospital, it was impossible for Claire to have known these details about her donor. So where could these memories have come from? Professor Paul Pearsall is a cardio neurologist from the University of Honolulu. He first encountered stories like Claire's whilst recovering in hospital from a bone marrow transplant. Speaker 5: I had a bone marrow transplant for stage four cancer in the very early 80s and I was on the transplant unit and we would sit down at night all of us who were dying and most of us were, and talk about things. And the heart transplant recipients were reporting, receiving the memories, feelings, food preferences, fears, musical preferences of their donor. One woman who got the heart of a boxer was the most quiet, demure, easygoing woman, hated violence, left the room when her husband would watch football. She got this heart of the boxer, now she watches football and yells and swears and punches and everything. So that's when I started hearing all these remarkable stories and I started to collect every single one I could. Speaker 0: Could the transplanted heart be bringing with it some kind of information from its previous owner? We know that the heart is a hugely energetic organ and is in constant communication with the brain. 40,000 neurons or nerve cells in the heart communicate up to the brain. Hormones from the heart travel in our bloodstream and every time the heart beats it creates a pulse wave. But most impressive of all is our heart's magnetic energy, 5,000 times more powerful than the brain. It can be measured up to feet away from our bodies. Speaker 5: I thought this heart is just as powerful, more powerful, and does talk to the brain. Maybe we should be paying attention to that. Maybe the brain, even though it thinks it's us, isn't. Speaker 0: Professor Pearsall was sure that the energy of the heart and its relationship with the brain was the key. And as more and more transplant patients came up with these remarkable experiences, it seemed to confirm it. But could his hunch stand up to science? Speaker 5: The heart is a connective organ, a gentle organ. It's a different type of intelligence. I don't know all about its intelligence. That's what we need to learn, And how we learn that is by asking openly questions about people's hearts, not dismissing them as poetry, as metaphor. Say maybe there's something to this. Speaker 0: Professor Pearsall collated his research into a book called The Heart's Code. In it, he explored these stories about organ transplant patients and what they reveal about where we store our memories. Simultaneously, on the opposite side of America, Professor of Psychology and Psychiatry from Yale University, Gary Schwartz, was developing a new theory of how memory could work. Speaker 1: I was studying how feedback mechanisms are involved in learning. When we talk, for example, how the brain learns, we talk about what are called neural networks in the brain. It turns out that the way a neural network works is that the output of the neurons feed back to the input of the neurons. And this process goes over and over again. And so long as the feedback is present, the neurons will learn. If you cut the feedback, there is no learning in the neurons. And the implication is that it's important for the neurons to have the feedback in order for the learning to take place. Well, by extension, any system that has feedback is gonna therefore learn. I mean, we learn to shoot baskets, for example, in basketball by getting feedback about whether we're accurate or not. We learn to speak by getting feedback about whether we're accurate or not. And so consequently, any system, any set of cells that has feedback mechanisms in a network is gonna learn the same way that neurons learn. And that's what's called feedback memory or systemic memory. Speaker 0: He applied his theory of feedback memory to the heart and predicted that information could be transferred through organs in transplant surgery. At around the same time, cases like Claire Sylvia hit the headlines. And Professor Pearsall published numerous similar stories from transplant patients. The two men realized their common ground and got in touch with each other. Speaker 1: We spoke to each other on the telephone, and as I began to hear more details about the cases, I began to realize that this was a theoretical prediction that could actually be verified in the biomedical world. I told Paul that I felt it was very important that some of his best cases be looked at very carefully and that they be published in a journal article. Speaker 5: I collected and did the interviews and did the transcripts and the analysis of the transcripts and have got all the transcripts together and then sent them to Doctor. Schwartz. Speaker 0: They had to trace and interview not only the heart recipients but also the donor families What they were looking for were parallels between donor and recipient in their preferences, memories, and tastes. Speaker 1: I independently examined those cases, had them blindly looked at by other individuals, and then wrote a formal research report describing those cases and giving the kinds of examples of data that are sort of irrefutable. If you look at the content carefully, you will discover that the degree of coincidence is too detailed. For example, there's a case that we describe of a man 47 years old, and he received the heart of a 17 year old black young man. And he was not racist, but he had a lot of biases about what he expected of young black men, including the fact that if he was gonna pick up anything from them, he would be afraid, for example, that he might be picking up rap music. However, after he received the transplant of the various changes that he experienced is he had a profound change in his preference for music. He became obsessed with classical music. He began listening to it over and over. He began singing melodies classical melodies to songs he hadn't heard. His wife was thoroughly confused. Only later was it learned that the young boy was actually leaving his violin lessons because he was a classical violinist, and he was hit by a car. That kind of information is not the kind of information that you just get with a random assortment of fears or changes in simple preferences. Speaker 0: The stories they were collecting seemed to contain remarkable parallels. It seemed to Schwartz that the information relayed by the recipient could only have come from their new heart. Speaker 1: To the extent that the heart is serving as a circulating feedback storage system for core central memories in the body, then if that heart is taken out and placed in another body, those core central memories, which are circulating within the heart in its cellular and neural feedback loops would continue and be passed on in the new person. Speaker 0: Jim is one of those patients who experienced an extraordinary change directly after his operation five years ago. Speaker 4: Well, I left school when I was 15. I was a common man in a lorry driver room, so I didn't have a very good education. But I learned myself how to write, and I'm not very good Speaker 6: at Speaker 4: spelling. So it was a surprise to me that six months after we transplant, I just sat down one morning and just scribbled saying down, and then that led to many poems and me book what I'm writing. I just was writing and writing and writing, and that's how it came about, like, you know. And I don't know where it come from, to be honest with you, because I said I've never done anything like this before. I'm sending you a thousand kisses. Speaker 0: Before his transplant, Jim had no creative talent for writing and very little time for sentimentality. Speaker 4: Never ever wrote anything before in my life. Never even sent her a love letter in forty two years. Have I? Oh. Some Speaker 0: scientists now think they found a system of neurons in the heart that challenges the orthodox view of the brain. Speaker 5: Until the recent past, science has glorified the brain. The questions we should be asking as scientists is, is that the only place these things happen? When we just know about the heart and its remarkable energy, and its connections with the brain, and its neurons, and its hormones, if we know that, shouldn't we be asking is, and here comes the key scientific question, is there another source of intelligence? Is there another way to think? Not instead, but also. The question isn't either or. The question is and. And if we only glorify the brain, we'll never be open to the possibility that another organ thinks. Speaker 0: Researchers at the Institute of Heart Math in California are investigating the possibility that the heart could actually have its own unique intelligence. Doctor Roland McCratie and his colleagues have developed experiments to see whether the metaphors of the heart could stand up to scientific scrutiny. Speaker 6: I first heard of Paul Pearsall when I think he contacted me in terms of exploring possible mechanisms that might explain the the phenomena of a heart transplant recipient taking on some of the personality characteristics of the person that they got the heart from. He'd interviewed quite a number of patients that had this experience and there's enough of this that I think we have to take it seriously. There is something going on here. Speaker 0: Doctor. McCratie's research is controversial, but he found support in evidence provided by a neurologist, Doctor. Andrew Amour from Montreal in Canada. After many years treating patients with heart disease he observed there was more to the heart than the current scientific model could explain. Speaker 7: In those days, in the sixties, there was no consideration of the nervous system. The heart was just a pump and the reason is because people have not had the facility to see the heart in any other form. You look at it and it's a pump. Right? And my own bias is that in the last fifty years or so, we have developed the ability with all the electronics to record more than just the muscle on the heart, but the neurons on the heart. Speaker 0: As he looked closer, he noticed something remarkable. Speaker 7: I started to record outside the heart and found neurons that no one had expected before. And I thought, gee, that's sort of nice. I wonder if that could be on the heart. Right? So from there and having developed techniques that I felt good about, I put them on a heart and bingo, they worked. Speaker 0: He had discovered a sophisticated collection of neurons in the heart. According to him, they were organized into a small but complex nervous system. He called it the little brain in the heart. Suddenly, our traditional views on the brain and intelligence were being challenged. If the heart had brain cells, could it have its own unique type of intelligence? The researchers at HeartMath believe so. They call it heart intelligence. Speaker 6: The heart itself has a quite complex nervous system and all the types of neurons and the way they're wired together to be able to say that the heart has a functional brain. And doctor Armour has pictures of it. I mean, it's there's definitely a little brain in the heart. And the types of neurons that are in the brain and the heart have also been demonstrated to have both short and long term memory using the same type of techniques that you'd use to show that neurons in the brain exhibit memory. Speaker 7: This little collection of neurons can retain input function for a little while. So if your heart beats, puts it in, this little guy is still oscillating. So the last cardiac cycle could set up a number of future cardiac cycles. That's memory. Speaker 0: Once a heart is removed from the donor, it is cooled and can stay alive for up to four hours. Speaker 7: Heart's in the room. Thank you. Speaker 0: Only when the heart is profused with blood from its new owner does it spontaneously start beating again. It is thought that this internal nervous system or brain in the heart is what allows a heart transplant to work. McCratie goes further. Speaker 6: Certainly the function of the heart itself have got to be transplanted and go along. When you think of the heart it's a very complex organ. All the coordination that has to happen within the heart for it to pump efficiently and it it really can't function properly and efficiently without the neural system in the in the heart. That that's very clear. So that those types of functions have got to get transplanted, and there's certain types of memory there that the heart has to remember what it did last beat or a few beats ago to be able to function properly now. Speaker 7: Boy, the heart started beating right away, didn't it? Pretty good. Pretty nice. Speaker 0: If the heart has a nervous system and a type of memory needed for its efficient function, could higher level memories also be stored and transferred? And what would this tell us about where our memory resides? Speaker 6: Memory itself is what's called distributed, distributed process. And this has been known for many, many, many hundred years. Now that you can't localize memory to a neuron or a group of neurons. The memory itself is distributed throughout the neural system. So why do we have to draw a line at the throat and say that memory is only distributed from here to here? Why couldn't it be distributed throughout the whole neural system? Speaker 0: And if memory is distributed throughout the nervous system, including organs like the heart, what would this mean for transplant recipients? Speaker 6: When you put a heart into a transplant, we could potentially retrieve some of those memories that were distributed throughout the whole system. I'm certainly not saying that is the explanation, but it's plausible that could be what's going on. Speaker 0: Some heart transplant recipients feel a change so profound they are battling with a complete transformation. Bill Wohl from Phoenix, Arizona had a heart transplant five years ago. His change after the operation was dramatic. Speaker 8: I couldn't have been luckier because I got a fantastic donor, someone super healthy, handsome leading man, good looks, and the fun began. Speaker 0: Bill felt he was being driven by a completely new personality. Previously a successful and hardworking businessman, he put his career aside and began a new life. Doctor Jack Copeland was his transplant surgeon. Speaker 7: Within months, the man was transformed into an athlete. We have very little idea that this was going to happen to him, but it did. He started cycling, he started working out, he started swimming. Speaker 0: Just months after his operation, Bill began training excessively. But it wasn't until a full year later, when he met his donor family, that he found out that he had developed remarkable parallels to his donor. Speaker 8: I know on certain things that I had no interest or whatever in before, it had to come from somewhere and it makes sense to me, and I truly believe that it came from my donor. Speaker 0: Brady, Bill's donor, was a Hollywood stuntman. Go. Whoo. It was only when Bill met his donor family that his new interests seemed to make sense. He is convinced that he has inherited many personality traits through his donor's heart. The researchers at the Institute of Heart Math set out to design an experiment to investigate the heart's role in processing emotional information. Speaker 6: What we found was that the heart is by far the most accurate part of our body that reflects how we're feeling. Our heart is literally beating out different messages that is strongly correlated with our emotional state. It's a scientific fact, even though a lot of people don't know this, that the heart sends more information to the brain than the brain sends to the heart. Speaker 1: It's very important to understand the relationship between the brain and the heart because this ultimately helps us understand how the heart can have memories related to the brain. The brain and the heart are interconnected by multiple sources of information. First of all, there's neural connection from the brain to the heart. There's also humoral connections. Okay? Hormones will go from the brain to the heart. The heart, in turn, of course, sends feedback back to the brain through pressure receptors and through, literally the blood going back. But then, what's often not recognized is that the heart is the largest generator of electromagnetic signals in the body. In fact, the EKG is is 10, a 100 times even larger than the EEG of the brain. And the electrical signal from the heart travels through the bloodstream to the brain. And, of course, the brain's electrical signal travels back to the heart. So consequently, these two are sharing their interactions even electromagnetically with each other. Speaker 6: It's like a radio transmitter works. The heart radiates very strong fields, and the heart is the strongest rhythmic source of electromagnetic fields in the body. And with today's equipment, we can measure the magnetic field of the heart six feet away from the body. Probably, goes farther, but that's the sensitivity of the equipment we have now. Speaker 0: They began investigating the heart's role in our experience of feeling and emotion. Speaker 6: Some of our more recent research where we're looking at the, I call it the electrophysiology of intuition, are indicating that the heart really is connected to some other, I call it, field of information. Speaker 0: In the experiment, subjects were shown photographs chosen to cause extreme emotions, both positive and negative. They were selected at six second intervals at random. They recorded the physiology of brain and heart activity. Speaker 6: What we found is in that what we call pre stimulus period before they saw the photograph, that both the heart and the brain would react differently. That the heart was shifting changing, before the brain was. Speaker 0: According to McCraty, the experiment shows that the heart is behaving intuitively. Remarkably, the heart registers an anticipatory response before a disturbing image appears on screen and sends a message directly to the emotional centers of the brain. The brain then prepares the body to take action. Speaker 6: This was even a surprise to us that the heart was plugged into this type of information even before the brain. Speaker 0: Where all this leads according to McCraty is to suggestion that the brain doesn't have an exclusive role in information processing. Speaker 6: It is quite plausible then that if we transplant a heart from one person to another, that that transplanted heart is connected to a field that field of information from the person that got that heart from and it feels like there's somebody else inside them. Speaker 0: MacRatty's theories are not accepted by mainstream medicine but patients like Claire Sylvia are still searching for an explanation for what they feel. With new evidence that an organ like the heart could have its own unique type of intelligence, we are moving towards an understanding of how the heart, in collaboration with the brain, has a role to play in interpreting the world around us. Speaker 5: The heart may be based on current science a sentient thinking, feeling, remembering organ. That's the story. The transplant patients are some of the data. If that's true, then we ask the question, have we been thinking without a heart for all these years or at least not as much with it as we should? If that's the case, we better wake up and have a heart.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Chinese medicine has long linked organs with emotions. For example, the liver with anger, the lungs with grief, and the heart with joy. Modern transplants appear to validate these beliefs, with recipients suddenly overwhelmed by new emotional states they had never experienced before. But is this being considered in the process?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The psychological burden of transplant recipients is immense. Many recipients describe feeling like a stranger suddenly lives inside them. Some resist the new organ because of the way this makes them feel, while others embrace it as a “guardian angel.” Studies suggest even one’s attitude toward the organ can affect whether or not the transplant succeeds.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

It seems that “trapped emotions” may transfer with organs. That means traumas embedded deep within the donor may end up with the recipient. Therapies to release these emotions have reportedly improved organ acceptance and even function. Ignoring them only compounds suffering and increases the chance of rejection.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While it sounds unbelievable, these aren’t isolated anecdotes—they’re documented patterns. The stories in @MidwesternDoc's report will leave you with goosebumps: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-unseen-cost-of-organ-transplants

The Unseen Cost of Organ Transplants: Ethical Issues and Spiritual Implications Exploring the Ambiguity of Brain Death, the Ethics of Organ Harvesting, and the Mysterious Transference of Consciousness midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

So what’s the solution? Medicine presents a false and dangerous choice. They currently want to relax the definitions of death to make it even easier to harvest organs and increase supply, or we allow black markets to flourish. Both are unacceptable. There are alternatives to harvesting organs. These include lab-grown organs, xenotransplants, and therapies that restore failing organs before transplant is needed.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc One such therapy is DMSO. Decades ago, IV DMSO was shown to reverse brain injuries that often lead to “brain death.” If adopted, using DMSO could save patients who are now written off as hopeless. This could even reduce the demand for organs altogether.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

At its core, this is much bigger than medicine. Organ transplantation forces us to confront questions about consciousness, death, and the very nature of memory. Where do our emotions really live? Where is our identity stored? And what happens when those things are transplanted into another body? If we’re going to remove organs from one human and put them into another, we must answer these questions. It is irresponsible not to.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Organ transplantation is sold as a miracle. Yes, the practice has saved countless lives. Maybe even someone in your own life has been touched by organ transplantation. But behind the curtain lies corruption, redefined death, live harvesting, and spiritual questions that modern science refuses to face. The truth is disturbing. And it can’t be ignored.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-unseen-cost-of-organ-transplants

The Unseen Cost of Organ Transplants: Ethical Issues and Spiritual Implications Exploring the Ambiguity of Brain Death, the Ethics of Organ Harvesting, and the Mysterious Transference of Consciousness midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-dont-tell-you-about-c-sections

What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections Exploring the short and long term consequences of a frequently unnecessary procedure midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The Great Cholesterol Scam and The Dangers of Statins https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-cholesterol-scam-and-the

The Great Cholesterol Scam and The Dangers of Statins Exploring the Actual Causes and Treatments of Heart Disease midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. --> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/6q2ec60QGx

Saved - October 9, 2025 at 2:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by recent reports of banks in Australia freezing accounts based on social connections and crypto purchases. One woman faced intense questioning about her friends and online groups after her account was frozen. Others have struggled to access their funds without proper documentation. This seems to be a troubling trend towards digital control and surveillance. To combat this, there's a free webinar tomorrow on protecting your data and assets from such control. It’s crucial to stay informed and safeguard our freedoms.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

DISTURBING: Banks are now deciding who you can be friends with—and freezing your money if you refuse to comply. Across Australia, alarming new cases show banks crossing every line under the excuse of “keeping you safe.” One woman’s account was frozen after a small crypto purchase. When she went in for answers, staff grilled her about her Facebook groups, WhatsApp chats, and demanded the name of the friend who showed her how to invest. When she refused, they kept her account frozen and ordered her to cut ties. Another woman was denied cash to pay contractors without “invoices.” Others have had their accounts locked for months with no explanation. These new “Know Your Customer” rules are quietly conditioning people to accept digital IDs and social credit control. The blueprint for digital tyranny is already here. @zeee_media reveals how it starts—and what comes next. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v701v2s-candace-was-right-and-banks-telling-people-who-they-can-be-friends-with-dai.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Three Australian cases illustrate bank overreach amid crypto, Know Your Customer rules and digital-ID talk. A woman known as Mantra Moments says a bank froze her account after a crypto purchase; after a second attempt, staff asked for private information about a friend. “Your restriction stays for two more days,” and “We’re keeping you safe,” she says, leaving her unable to pay rent. In another case, a customer withdrawing cash for construction faced demands for invoices; maximum without proof is $4,000 a day; “we need proof” and “there's a lot of scams... protect you from being reckless.” A third story: Katie McMaster was locked out of HSBC, told to verify identity with “100 points of ID” after no suspicious activity; recall of “know your customer” and warnings that digital ID/digital currency/social credit are coming. Promo: free webinar Oct 9 privacyacademy.com/pulse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have a story for you today that will make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up. Banks are completely out of control, and their increasingly disturbing behavior is rising in line with things like digital ID, digital currency, and a social credit system coming in like a freight train. The three examples we'd like to show you today out of the countless examples online come out of Australia. The first story is about a woman who goes by Mantra Moments on Facebook. In a video posted to Facebook, she says she purchased a very small amount of crypto. She said she's done this before, and the bank put a temporary hold on her account. And after they, I suppose, did whatever checks they do, the transaction went through without any issues. But this time, when she purchased another small amount of crypto from the same place as before, the bank refused to unfreeze her account. So she went into the bank, and here is what follows that visit. This was shared by Cafe Locked Out on x. Take a listen. Speaker 1: Anyway, cut a long story short, I ended up they had to call head office or wherever it is, and they eventually got me on the phone and started asking me all these questions, including my Facebook, my WhatsApp, what groups I'm in, etcetera, etcetera. And, of course, I'm like, I'm not gonna give them all that information. I'm just like, I'm in heaps groups. In fact, I had to actually delete my, WhatsApp the other day because it was too full. So, you know, lots of groups. And then they wanted to know if I was in any crypto groups. And I said, oh, yeah. But I never get on them because I I just haven't got the time. There's too much stuff to look at. So, yeah, no worries. They said, well, how'd you find out about this, crypto? Was it online, or was it on Facebook, or was it on WhatsApp, or whatever? I said, no. Just through a friend. Oh, what's your friend's name? I said, well, I'm not gonna tell you what my friend's name is. Yeah. What's your friend's name? I said, well, I'm not telling you that. That's private information. Well, are they involved with this crypto? I said, I'm not gonna tell you that either. That's their private financial information. And, oh, fair enough. Fair enough, they said. So they continued with all these questions that were just none of their business, to be honest. And, then they went back to ask me about my friend. And I said, look. I I am not telling you that is private information, and I'm not telling you about her finances. That is private information. She simply showed me what to do on the computer because I don't know to do it. Speaker 0: So after questioning her about her friend, the teller goes away, perhaps to speak to a superior, I guess, and listen to the reason he tells her the bank will not give this woman access to her own money. Speaker 1: So he comes back after quite some time and says, oh, well, you won't tell us who your friend is, and you won't give us that information. So you're restricted. Your restriction stays for two more days. I said, beg your pardon? I said, yeah. It stays for two more days, and then you ring us back. I said, hang on a minute here. Are you telling me because I won't disclose someone else's private information to you that you're gonna restrict my account for another two days until I come back and go through all this again? And they said, yes. And then they said, and we advise you not to speak to her again, to your friend. I said, what? We're keeping you safe. They use the safe narrative. We're you know, fans saying that to us. Speaker 0: She finishes the video by explaining that her ability to pay her rent and bills is now not possible because she won't tell the bank who her friend is, who she says she's known for years, by the way, and give them private financial information about this friend. And the bank is advising her to no longer speak to her friend. They say they're keeping her safe. What kind of beyond Orwellian nightmare are we stepping into here? The second story relates to a woman who tried to withdraw money to pay contractors working on her house. Take a listen. Speaker 2: Okay. I'm bloody furious right now. I just left the bank, CBA, and I went to withdraw 8 and a half thousand dollars. The lady at the teller goes, what's the purpose of your withdrawal? I said, I'm building. And she goes, okay. Fine. She gave me my money, and I go, next week, I wanna withdraw another $20,000 cash. And she goes, okay. You can place the order because I know larger amounts of cash withdrawals you need to order in advance. And she goes, again, what's the purpose of your withdrawal? I go, I'm building. And she goes, okay. Do you have invoices? I go, no. I don't have invoices because I haven't paid them, obviously, but I have quotes. And she goes, okay. Make sure you bring your quotes. And I was like, okay. But what if I don't have quotes? And she goes, then you won't be able to withdraw your money. She basically said, you have to give us proof or a reason. I go, I've given you a reason. I'm building, and I like to pay my tradies in cash. And she goes, yeah. That's not good enough. We need proof. I go, okay. Hang on a minute. What if I just wanna withdraw $10,000 to go to the casino tomorrow night and just have a great night, go to a fine dining restaurant, buy myself Louis Vuitton's and a Chanel bag, and, you know, spend all my money, gamble it away. You know? I go, it's my money. I can do whatever I want. And then she looks at that lady next to her at the teller, and then that lady, you know, she steps in and she goes, we wouldn't be able to give you $10,000 if you were going to the casino. I go, why not? And she goes, we there's a lot of scams out there, and we just need to protect you from being reckless. I I was just dumbfounded. Was like, excuse me? I go, it's my money. I can I can flush it down the toilet if I like? I go, so what's the limit? What's the maximum I can withdraw without proof and without invoices or whatever? And she goes, well, you can withdraw 2,000 at the ATM and 2,000 at a teller. So maximum $4,000 a day. No questions asked. Okay. So okay. So anything over $84,000, they need a reason. I go, well, I've given you a reason. I'm building. And she goes, yeah. But if that amount large amount of money, $20,000, we're gonna need invoices or quotes or proof. I was just I go, what what if I just wanna buy a Rolex? And she goes, well, we need the invoice. I go, well, freaking Rolex is not gonna give me an invoice if I have purchased it. I was like, what? Speaker 0: We're keeping you safe. The classic line of power tripping governments and those working in cahoots with them, aka big banks, steadily progressing towards a system where you can only access your money for what they say you can. Let me tell you what's happening here. They are getting the population used to the terms of a digital ID, digital currency, and social credit system. The three go hand in hand, and that is why banks suddenly feel empowered to tell you who you can and can't be friends with and what you can and can't do with your money. But right now, you still have the opportunity to argue with them. The author of that video is Cherry Cups Co on Instagram. Her video went viral, and the bank, CBA, one of the major banks in Australia, had to respond because they were exposed. So she later explains they gave her access to her money in the end. Wow. What a feat. I get to access my money. Once a digital ID and digital currency and social credit system is implemented, there's no one to argue with anymore. In fact, if you make a video like that go viral, you will likely be penalized rather than get an apology or compromise from the beast system. Finally, and this story comes to us from the Daily Mail, Ozzy locked out of her bank account for a second time in months without an explanation. There's something wrong. Says Katie McMaster, 36, had to visit an HSBC branch in Melbourne last week to verify her identity. There's a key point there. We'll talk about that in a moment. After she was locked out of her personal accounts, she'd switched from her previous bank, ING, in June after a similar issue left her unable to access her money for two days after her account was suspended. She initially thought it was a technical issue. She called the bank and learned that her account had been flagged for fraud, and you go down to see that she received no notification from the bank about any suspicious activity, no suspicious transactions, actually. She was advised that she needed to go into a branch and verify her identity with a 100 points of ID and that they couldn't tell her why the restrictions had been put on. So she goes into the branch, gives them her 100 points of ID. They add it to her account, and then they said that she needs to wait two to three business days for a response from HSBC. She said, again, they couldn't tell me as to why the restrictions were taking place, only that I had to wait a while while they investigated. She says that this is the personal account that only receives her monthly salary and was used for her everyday transactions. She says, guys, I'm just a regular girl in Melbourne. The only bulk income payment is my salary from my job that I've been at for almost three years. Same employer, same bank account, always paying monthly. The outgoings are just my mortgage, my bills and expenses for the cost of living, the occasional restaurant or bar here and there, and my phone bill. Well, Katie McMaster, I can tell you why this keeps happening to people. Not just you. It's happening all around the world. It's called know your customer. Sold to everyone as protecting people from fraud and things of this nature, but serves as a vehicle to impose new rules and regulations onto financial institutions like the 100 points of ID rule, which is a way of conditioning people to accept their digital ID being linked to their bank account. Do you know how I know this? Because this exact situation happened to someone very close to me, and I reported it was coming to everyone else about two years ago. When this person went into the bank, the teller openly told them that this was related to digital ID, and all banks would be doing it soon. At the time, they said it didn't matter that that person had already provided their ID, their 100 points of ID, and had been with that bank for more than two decades. It was about a number on the back of their driver's license, which would somehow eventually be linked to their digital ID. We'd suggest everyone goes and looks at the current updates to know your customer to find out what may be coming next. Now these three stories are just a taste of what digital ID and digital currency brings. As someone who's been debanked for my speech previously, and I've told everyone about this before, it is an extremely uncomfortable experience. At the time, I was able to find a new bank, but there will be a time where that option doesn't exist for the violators of either approved speech or approved purchases. This is why digital ID must be stopped dead in its tracks, and we can never allow any form of digital ID to be linked to digital currency. Wake up or else. It's time to take back our freedom in the digital world. The last webinar we told you about from our friends at Privacy Academy received such positive feedback that they're doing it again for free for our viewers. Join us for an exclusive free live webinar, top five steps to exit the surveillance state and protect yourself online happening on Thursday, October 9 at 7PM central. Big Tech and Big Brother are teaming up, tracking your every move with planned CBDCs, digital IDs, and social credit systems. Censorship is spiking, and your privacy is under attack. But here's the good news. You can fight back, and it's easier than you think. In this webinar, our trusted partners at Privacy Academy are breaking it down with five actionable steps to shield your data, protect your assets, and reclaim your freedom from hackers, scammers, and overreaching surveillance. Plus, you'll discover how to support businesses that actually care about your privacy. Spots are limited, so don't wait. Head to privacyacademy.com/pulse to grab your seat. Let's exit the surveillance state together and take control of our digital lives. That's Thursday, October 9 at 7PM central for their free live webinar. Take the first step towards digital freedom. Sign up now at privacyacademy.com/pulse. That's privacyacademy.com/pulse. Link in the description below.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: If banks and governments can control your money, they can control you. That’s why our friends at PrivacyAcademy.com/Pulse are hosting a free live webinar TOMORROW, Thursday, October 9 at 7 PM Central Time: 5 Steps to Exit the Surveillance State and Protect Yourself Online. Learn how to safeguard your data, protect your assets, and fight back against digital tyranny. Spots are limited—reserve yours now at PrivacyAcademy.com/Pulse. DISCLOSURE: Thank you for supporting this sponsor, which keeps our website running to bring you uncensored news.

Saved - October 9, 2025 at 4:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I revealed that Charlie Kirk's leaked texts confirm Candace Owens was right; he resisted pressure from pro-Israel donors. Just before his assassination, he shared that major donors were pulling support because he wouldn’t cancel Tucker Carlson. The authenticity of these texts has been confirmed, exposing a campaign to discredit Owens. The attacks on her, Carlson, and Megyn Kelly were not about unity but about suppressing dissent. Candace never wavered, and now the evidence has dismantled their narrative.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

BOMBSHELL: Charlie Kirk’s leaked texts prove Candace Owens was right all along—he refused to be silenced by powerful pro-Israel donors. Less than 48 hours before his assassination, Kirk confided that major donors were abandoning him after he refused to cancel Tucker Carlson. In those same messages, he admitted he could no longer support the pro-Israel cause while facing relentless pressure to censor dissenting voices. TPUSA spokesman Andrew Kolvet has now confirmed the texts are authentic, exposing weeks of denial and a coordinated campaign to discredit Owens. Her investigation wasn’t reckless—it was righteous. The smear campaign against her, Tucker Carlson, and Megyn Kelly wasn’t about “unity.” It was about hiding the truth that Charlie’s refusal to bow made him a threat to those who depend on control. @RealCandaceO never backed down—and now the receipts have shattered their narrative. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v701v2s-candace-was-right-and-banks-telling-people-who-they-can-be-friends-with-dai.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The year is 2025, and Candace Owens continues to pursue what happened in Charlie Kirk's assassination, challenging the official narrative. In leaked texts, TP USA spokesman Andrew Colvet confirms that she was truthful about a group chat where Charlie Kirk, 48 hours before his death, said he was unhappy with donors pulling funding due to him refusing to cancel Tucker Carlson at TP USA events. The texts have been released. Does this prove who killed Charlie? No. But it shows a weeks-long campaign by multiple influencers and leaders to paint Charlie's evolving beliefs as something they weren't. The moral: free speech in action. Armstrong's The Bible and Gold argues that Gold isn't just a metal, Armstrong writes. It's god's testimony in the ground that truth is weighty, value is real, and justice is measurable. Genesis Gold Group promotes retirement protection with precious metals; Honest money for uncertain times. Visit goldbiblepulse.com.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The year is 2025, and whether people like it or not, in the latest installment of insert name here was right, that name is Candace Owens. Since the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk, it's obviously far from a secret that Candace Owens has been like a dog with a bone, trying to get to the bottom of what really happened, who was really responsible, and it goes without saying that everyone at this point knows the official narrative makes very little sense. It's been incredible watching the people who, from the start, aim to deride Candace, who was clearly sincerely asking questions and digging into every aspect of this assassination and the investigation, something that most influences at this point and even people close to Charlie seemed hesitant to do, with some people quite indifferent about getting to the bottom of this, and some people online have even been completely against asking any further questions. If you don't accept that 20 year old gay trans enthusiast Zoomers write Shakespearean soliloquies confessing to every point that the public was questioning, you are simply a horrible person and defiling Charlie Kirk's legacy. You're insensitive, actually, if you don't completely trust the authorities and mass media who've been lying to you about everything for decades. But not this. Now they are totally telling you the truth. Trust the experts. In the midst of this leaked text saga, perhaps the most astounding thing has been to watch the insane influencer campaign to try to discredit Candace Owens and her efforts. But none other than TP USA spokesman Andrew Colvet has confirmed that she was telling the truth. To give you a backdrop here, Candace last week claimed that a group chat existed where Charlie Kirk, just forty eight hours before he was assassinated, communicated that he was unhappy with donors who were pulling funding due to him refusing to cancel Tucker Carlson at TP USA events. She said that in that text exchange, Charlie communicated that because of this ongoing pressure to stifle free speech, he had no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause. We have those texts now. They've been released. They're up on the screen for you to see right now. Now we encourage everyone to go and watch his full remarks, but here is his confirmation that the screenshot of the group chat exchange is real. Speaker 1: But I wanna take the start of this show to address some of the things that have been going around on public, namely about a text a group text chain that has been made known and released by Candace Owens. And I just wanna address it head on because, you know, that was a text grab a screen grab that I had shared, with people. So it it is authentic. Speaker 0: So why does all of this matter? Does this prove anything? Does this prove who killed Charlie? No. Absolutely not. But what it does prove is that the weeks long campaign by multiple influences and even political leaders to paint Charlie's belief systems as something that were not evolving definitely existed. Think about who's been smeared relentlessly these past few weeks. Actually, they've been smeared for longer than that, but especially these past few weeks. Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, and Megyn Kelly, all people who are very close to Charlie and all people who have spoken up loudly about the pressure this man was under for what? Having evolving views, fostering an environment of free speech at his events, the very supposed thing that people were donating to, that being Charlie's vision of free speech and more speech solving most of our problems, suddenly pulling funding for Charlie living those very values because they didn't like that speech, which they're entitled to do, by the way. You don't have to fund something you don't like, but don't pretend to be pro free speech when in reality, free speech has limits for you. And we have some real lessons to learn from this. First of all, and I've been alluding to this for some time, but let me say it expressly right now. So much of what we see from paid influencers is exactly that. Mouthpieces for whoever is paying their checks this week or people who purport to be for free speech being vehemently against it if it in any way threatens their income or influence in any way. The hypocrisy of a lot of these influencers who rose during the time of COVID or the last election cycle and grew their platforms by gaining the trust of the people who promoted them are spending most of their time gaslighting the public, flat out utilizing psychological manipulation tactics on the masses for the crime of asking questions. As I've said, the answer to so called hate speech or speech people don't like or even people spreading lies is actually more speech. This is an example of just that. Candace said whatever she wanted as she should, and the haters were out there trying to drive a bus over her for doing so as they're entitled to do, by the way, in a free speaking society. The truth came out as it always does, and that's how the world checks itself. It's the perfect example of free speech. We don't want the fake people and liars to shut up, actually. We want them to keep exposing themselves, and Candace demonstrated that point to the world in real time. The moral of this story today isn't necessarily Candace and the leaked texts. Charlie's assassination, and who's responsible for it. Those things, of course, matter, and it matters to keep asking further questions. But the moral of this story is free speech, something Charlie always stood for regardless of the outcome. What we've witnessed here is free speech in action. In his revealing book, The Bible and Gold, author Alan Armstrong examines a troubling truth. Our modern monetary system directly contradicts biblical finance principles of honest weights and measures. Gold isn't just a metal, Armstrong writes. It's god's testimony in the ground that truth is weighty, value is real, and justice is measurable. Genesis Gold Group has built their entire approach to retirement protection on these same timeless principles. While central banks print trillions from nothing, gold remains what God declared it to be in Genesis. Good. Armstrong's exploration of gold and sound money couldn't be more timely, From the tabernacle to Solomon's temple to the streets of New Jerusalem, scripture consistently presents gold as god's standard of honest value. Genesis Gold Group's faith driven experts help you transform vulnerable retirement accounts into physical precious metals, Not paper promises, but tangible wealth that preserves purchasing power against the very devaluation Armstrong diagnoses. Why trust your family's future to a system built on monetary deception when there's a biblical alternative? Visit goldbiblepulse.com today for your free copy of the bible and gold, and schedule a consultation to align your retirement strategy with god's principles of honest money. That's goldbiblepulse.com. Honest money for uncertain times.
Saved - October 8, 2025 at 11:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A massive study involving over 8 million people has revealed that all COVID vaccines are linked to increased cancer risks, with significant rises in breast (20%), colorectal (28%), gastric (34%), lung (53%), prostate (69%), and thyroid (35%) cancers. Despite these findings, the CDC continues to promote the vaccines, even for individuals with various health risk factors. Experts suggest the spike protein may be carcinogenic, a claim dismissed by mainstream sources. I question the transparency surrounding these risks and the concept of informed consent.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

DISTURBING: A massive study of over 8 million people has rocked the medical world—concluding that ALL COVID VACCINES are tied to a higher risk of cancer. Yet just yesterday, the CDC and Deputy HHS Secretary Jim O’Neill celebrated a “return to informed consent,” keeping these same shots on the market. Researchers found alarming increases across major cancers: breast (20%), colorectal (28%), gastric (34%), lung (53%), prostate (69%), and thyroid (35%). Experts now warn that the spike protein may be directly carcinogenic—a finding dismissed by the mainstream but confirmed by top oncologists and epidemiologists. Still, U.S. officials recommend the shots for anyone with “risk factors” like obesity, heart disease, neurological issues, and even “physical inactivity.” That’s nearly the entire population. If this is what they call informed consent, why are Americans still being kept in the dark about shedding—and the truth behind these cancer risks? @zeee_media exposes what they never wanted you to see. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v6zzwm6-turning-off-phone-and-internet-for-dissidents-daily-pulse-ep-123.html

Saved - October 8, 2025 at 8:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A newly uncovered FBI memo reveals that Biden’s DOJ conducted a covert operation called “Arctic Frost,” spying on eight GOP senators, including Lindsey Graham and Josh Hawley, under Special Counsel Jack Smith’s direction. Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley criticized the investigation as a severe breach of constitutional limits, potentially worse than Watergate. Whistleblowers also indicated that the FBI accessed the phones of Donald Trump and Mike Pence, affecting nearly a hundred conservative groups. Governor Ron DeSantis questioned what actions will follow this scandal, emphasizing the need for justice.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

BOMBSHELL: A newly uncovered FBI memo reveals that Biden’s DOJ secretly spied on eight GOP senators in a politically charged operation called “Arctic Frost.” The Bureau tracked the private phone data of Lindsey Graham, Josh Hawley, Ron Johnson, and others—all under Special Counsel Jack Smith’s direction. Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley says the investigation shattered constitutional limits, calling it “arguably worse than Watergate.” Whistleblowers confirmed the FBI also accessed the government phones of Donald Trump and Mike Pence, while nearly a hundred conservative groups were caught in the dragnet. Governor Ron DeSantis asked what millions of Americans are thinking: “So what will be done about this?” After years of scandals, from Russiagate to Arctic Frost, Americans don’t need more evidence of corruption—they need justice. @zeee_media explains why this may be the most explosive abuse of power in modern U.S. history. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v6zzwm6-turning-off-phone-and-internet-for-dissidents-daily-pulse-ep-123.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
"The FBI, under Joe Biden, spied on eight Republican senators as part of its Arctic Frost investigation." Grassley said the 2023 investigation "formed the basis of special counsel Jack Smith's elector case against president Trump, targeted eight GOP senators' personal cell phones for tolling data, tracking their use between January 4 and January 7." The memo notes "The one secret FBI record dated September 2023 has the title of cast assistance, a likely reference to the bureau's cellular analysis survey team" and "The case ID for the record is Arctic Frost election law matters sensitive investigative matter caste." It lists eight including "Lindsey Graham, Bill Haggerty, Josh Hawley, Dan Sullivan, Tommy Tuberville, Ron Johnson, Cynthia Lummis, senator Marsha Blackburn, as well as rep Mike Kelly." "Whistleblower disclosure obtained earlier this year revealed the FBI, personal assistance from officials in the Biden White House, also obtained the government's cell phones of president Donald Trump and former vice president Mike Pence." "Just last month, Grassley released records showing that 92 Republican linked individuals and groups like Turning Point USA were also scrutinized by the FBI as part of the Arctic Frost investigation." He added, "What the public is seeing now demonstrates the importance of congressional oversight and whistleblowers." "They need arrests, charges, court cases leading to convictions." "Visit goldbiblepulse.com today for your free copy of the bible and gold, and schedule a consultation to align your retirement strategy with god's principles of honest money."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, the US government seems to not just be interested in spying on American citizens, but also on GOP senators. This comes to us from zero hedge. Trump slams deranged Jack Smith after bombshell memo exposes Biden FBI spying on GOP senators. An FBI document obtained by Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Chuck Grassley shows that the FBI, under Joe Biden, spied on eight Republican senators as part of its Arctic Frost investigation. The revelation that the FBI snooped on the phone records of Republican members of Congress during its January 6 investigation is bringing greater scrutiny to then FBI director Christopher Wray, during whose tenure the bureau effort occurred and to then special counsel Jack Smith, who was leading the Biden justice department's investigation into Donald Trump. The one secret FBI record dated September 2023 has the title of cast assistance, a likely reference to the bureau's cellular analysis survey team. The case ID for the record is Arctic Frost election law matters sensitive investigative matter caste. Grassley said the 2023 investigation, which formed the basis of special counsel Jack Smith's elector case against president Trump, targeted eight GOP senators' personal cell phones for tolling data, tracking their use between January 4 and January 7. And we can see on that press release some of the senators included in that list were senator senator Lindsey Graham, Bill Haggerty, Josh Hawley, Dan Sullivan, Tommy Tuberville, Ron Johnson, Cynthia Lummis, senator Marsha Blackburn, as well as rep Mike Kelly. In that press release, Grassley stated, based on the evidence to date, Arctic Frost and related weaponization by federal law enforcement under Biden was arguably worse than Watergate. Grassley added, what I've uncovered today is disturbing and outrageous political conduct by the Biden FBI. The FBI's actions were an unconstitutional breach, and attorney general Bondi and director Patel need to hold accountable those involved in this serious wrongdoing. The FBI's Arctic Frost investigation began in April 2022 by former agent Timothy t Bolt and was assigned to special counsel Jack Smith in November '22. Whistleblower disclosure obtained earlier this year revealed the FBI, personal assistance from officials in the Biden White House, also obtained the government's cell phones of president Donald Trump and former vice president Mike Pence as part of the investigation. Just last month, Grassley released records showing that 92 Republican linked individuals and groups like Turning Point USA were also scrutinized by the FBI as part of the Arctic Frost investigation. Grassley noted that he has been working with whistleblowers since July 2022 and stated it's taken years to get records and advance my investigation. What the public is seeing now demonstrates the importance of congressional oversight and whistleblowers. My whistleblowers deserve great thanks for what they've helped expose. None of this would have been known without them. Governor Ron DeSantis tweeted, so what will be done about it? And many people have the same question. We saw with Russiagate that there were many press conferences, much evidence produced which could point to treasonous conspiracy. We saw some memes posted by Donald Trump of Obama getting arrested before he told us that Obama would likely be covered by presidential immunity. Therefore, there would likely be no accountability. But there were many more people involved in Russiagate. Where's the action? Where's the accountability? The sentiment we're seeing online is that the American people know that the FBI, DOJ, and all of these departments under the Biden administration were corrupt. They elected Donald Trump to take down the deep state. They don't need any convincing about the corruption. They need arrests, charges, court cases leading to convictions. Otherwise, as many people are noting on the Internet, this just appears to be grandstanding and lip service for all the things that they claim they're doing whilst not too much is actually being achieved to clean out this deep state. As the old saying goes, don't tell me what you're doing. Show me what you've done. In his revealing book, The Bible and Gold, author Alan Armstrong examines a troubling truth. Our modern monetary system directly contradicts biblical finance principles of honest weights and measures. Gold isn't just a metal, Armstrong writes. It's God's testimony in the ground that truth is weighty, value is real, and justice is measurable. Genesis Gold Group has built their entire approach to retirement protection on these same timeless principles. While central banks print trillions from nothing, gold remains what God declared it to be in Genesis. Good. Armstrong's exploration of gold and sound money couldn't be more timely. From the tabernacle to Solomon's temple to the streets of New Jerusalem, scripture consistently presents gold as god's standard of honest value. Genesis Gold Group's faith driven experts help you transform vulnerable retirement accounts into physical precious metals, not paper promises, but tangible wealth that preserves purchasing power against the very devaluation Armstrong diagnoses. Why trust your family's future to a system built on monetary deception when there's a biblical alternative? Visit goldbiblepulse.com today for your free copy of the bible and gold, and schedule a consultation to align your retirement strategy with god's principles of honest money. That's goldbiblepulse.com. Honest money for uncertain times.
Saved - October 8, 2025 at 8:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Canada's new bill poses a serious threat to free speech, allowing the government to cut off internet, phone, and banking access without warning for saying the "wrong thing." This could happen without any court order or appeal, and the process would remain secret. The bill is part of a broader Digital ID agenda, with Canada as a testing ground for what may come next in the U.S. Senator Rand Paul is actively working to prevent this from spreading. The implications for freedom are dire, as speech could become tied to access.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

REPORT: Canada just crossed a line that should terrify every free nation. A new bill would let the government instantly cut off your internet, phone, and even your online banking—simply for saying the “wrong thing.” If passed, Canada’s Industry Minister could declare your words a “threat” and erase your digital existence without warning. No court order. No appeal. And the most chilling part? It can all be done in secret—you wouldn’t even be allowed to say it happened. This is the Digital ID agenda in motion. The World Economic Forum admits “digital identity” will decide who gets to participate in society. Canada is the testing ground. The U.S. is next, with Real ID already laying the foundation. Senator Rand Paul is fighting to stop it before this technocratic nightmare spreads south. Because once speech is tied to access, freedom itself disappears. The clock is ticking—@zeee_media reveals how close we are to a digital gulag. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v6zzwm6-turning-off-phone-and-internet-for-dissidents-daily-pulse-ep-123.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues Canada introduced a bill allowing the minister to 'kick any Canadian citizen off the Internet to cut off their phone line, to turn off their phone.' 'If there is reasonable grounds to believe that it is necessary to do so to secure the Canadian telecommunication system against any threat, the minister may prohibit a telecommunication service provider from providing any service to the specified person.' He warns 15.2 clause five makes the decision 'secret.' He says this signals 'Chinese Communist Party levels of government overreach.' He links the bill to the digital ID agenda and World Economic Forum's claim that digital identity is crucial for 'civic participation' and to UN 'Real ID' plans, noting Rand Paul tweets. He argues it could isolate people from paying bills, banking, or organizing politics, describing a potential 'digital gulag.' He advocates repeal in the US and hopes Canada defeats the agenda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's no secret that Canada and the West and, really, the whole world has been storming towards the great reset, the new world order agenda, the fourth industrial revolution, agenda 2030, whatever name you call it, the agenda is the same. Complete control of your speech, complete control of your behavior, all facilitated through a dystopian technocratic state that is being rolled out across every single country. Canada has given us a very good example recently as to what that may look like for the whole world in the very near future. Take a listen to this new bill, which was introduced on October 1, which basically says that if you say the wrong thing, the government will be able to immediately cut your Internet and telephone access. Speaker 1: Now on to the present bill. I am concerned, as I say, by the following sections. Fifteen point one and fifteen point two give the minister the unprecedented, incredible power to kick any private Canadian citizen off the Internet to cut off their phone line, to turn off their cell phone. That is the plain language summary, but I will quote now the bill in its legalese. If there is reasonable grounds to believe that it is necessary to do so to secure the Canadian telecommunication system against any threat, the minister may prohibit a telecommunication service provider from providing any service to the specified person. Now perhaps this might make sense to do in an extreme circumstance if a person is trying to cause our satellites to crash or to jam military radar. But this section does not use language about extreme threats of physical damage or threats to national security. It says any threat. And as far as I can tell, given the Liberals' incautious and bombastic use of terms like misinformation, that being any information they don't like, or existential threat, for instance, the member from Milton called the leader of my party an existential threat to our democracy, which is, of course, bananas. So given their incautious and bombastic use of these phrases, it seems to me that the industry minister could deem any speech she doesn't like any threat and then kick that person off the Internet. This section reaches Chinese Communist Party levels of government overreach, they and should be ashamed of themselves. The bill gets worse. It does not get better, mister speaker. 15.2 clause five gives the minister the ability to make her decision to kick someone off the Internet. Secret. So imagine that. You've annoyed the liberal party overlords, and they've decided to kick you off the Internet and cut your phone line. You can't tell anyone that you've been cut off. I have no idea how this could even possibly be enforced. But imagine, imagine being put effectively in a digital gulag, unable to use the phone or the Internet or your online banking, and if you tell anyone, that this happened, you could go to physical jail. I do not doubt that the liberals will stand and say that I'm being somehow outlandish in my interpretation of this. I am not. It is there in black and white. Let me quote it for them. I it seems like they haven't read it. 15.2 clause five. An order made under subsection one or two may include a provision prohibiting the disclosure of its existence or some or all of its contents by any person. And if you aren't inclined to believe me, please just Google it. Speaker 0: Now this is, of course, an addition to the digital ID agenda, an addendum, if you will, because not only will they be able to silence anyone on the Internet and restrict their access to life? I mean, just just pause for a moment and think about what this really means. You can't pay your bills. You can't pay your electricity bill, your phone bill. Just just taking electricity as an example or even your water bill. How are you actually going to survive without the Internet in today's day and age? And people may say, well, I'll just go to the post office and pay my bill that way. Do all providers still allow for that? I'm not sure. But then you would also have to be able to check your bank balance. So, okay, you can go into the bank physically to check it all of the time, but the insurmountable inconvenience that this causes people cannot be understated. So they want to completely change the way that you live your life, completely change the way that you conduct yourself in the world in order to not share anything that goes against the agenda. Otherwise, you're essentially completely banned from civic society. Now that is what the digital ID agenda is actually about in the World Economic Forum. We've shown you this graph before. The World Economic Forum shows us what digital identity is crucial for, including the Internet of Things, economic progress, cybersecurity, justice and law, logistics, systematic racist systemic racism, rather. But here, this part here, civic participation. Meaning, unless you have a digital identity, you're excluded from civic participation. Now, of course, the bill doesn't probably expressly say that this is linked to the digital ID agenda. They'll never outright tell you that, but it is. Because the UN's agenda that is a published book, and you can watch on zmedia.com, just look up UN 100. You can watch the full agenda there. We have done an extensive report. It's well over three hours on this very thing, which talks about how not only will all of your online activity be linked to your identification, but then you will also be penalized for wrong think, essentially. Comments and thoughts that are not conducive with the society that they want to create for 2030 and beyond. And to be specific, their goal of 2030 has to do with the year 2045. We won't relitigate all of that right now. But, again, they won't expressly say it's linked to digital ID. But, of course, when you look at the makeup of these bills, they are all linked to that agenda, and that is very much the case with Real ID as well. Senator Rand Paul has tweeted about this just yesterday. Throwback. I said the Patriot Act was not patriotic, and I meant it. Secret courts, warrantless surveillance, a trade of liberty for false security. Another example of this, Real ID, a federal overreach that turns your driver's license into a tracking tool. My bill s two seven six nine repeals it. No more permission slips for freedom, and you can see the link to the bill there. Now I would say that this turns your driver's license into far more than just a tracking tool, as senator Rand Paul says. Nonetheless, we certainly support his efforts to get that repealed. Because maybe not in the next year, maybe not in the next two years, maybe it will, but eventually my point is that eventually, The US will start to see similar measures as Canada and Australia and The UK are taking if we allow them to keep going down this path of building the blocks of digital ID, which is what Real ID is. Just in a matter of a couple of months, Australians will not be able to even access a Google search unless they verify themselves online. And they'll say, well, maybe you won't need a digital ID for that. That was the original argument. No. No. It won't be digital ID. It'll just be age verification. But the point is that these two go hand in hand. The world that they are building, the dystopia that they are building, is that you cannot participate in society unless your ID is linked to everything that you do online. And just imagine the repercussions for people who present wrong think on the Internet, and then they're cut off from their phone and their Internet. They can't organize politically. So you may say, okay. Yes. I'll go to the post office and do all my banking in person. Maybe you can manage all of that. But you can't organize any political action. You can't voice your concerns about certain bills or legislation or even appointments because you've been cut off from participating in civil society. That is the goal, and we can't allow it. And we support this effort to repeal this bill immediately in The United States. Hopefully, the people of Canada are able to defeat this agenda as well. Are you protected in a world where threats of EMPs, solar flares, five g, and all types of EMF are interfering with our very existence? Escape the grid with Escape Zone, bringing you the highest quality Faraday technology for ultimate preparedness. Choose when and where your devices are detectable. Faraday bags protect you from EMPs, car theft, card and device skimming, identity theft, tracking, Bluetooth, and GPS. Choose from premium mobile Faraday bags, cross body bags, laptop bags, and even women's handbags, or opt for the optimum protection with a ballistic backpack, combining cutting edge Faraday technology with a ballistic three a Kevlar for the ultimate protection and preparedness. Now you can also protect from EMF with their top notch EMF beanies and blankets, shielding you from some of the most harmful frequencies in our environment. Whatever Whatever your needs are, escape zone has you covered, and their range is perfect for personal use, family use, or even as a gift for someone you truly care about. Visit escapezone.com/pulse and protect you and your loved ones today. That's escapezone.com/pulse.
Saved - October 8, 2025 at 8:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
During a tense on-air exchange, I witnessed Chris Cuomo confront Eric Trump about the Trump administration's approach to political opponents. Cuomo questioned whether it was fair to say the administration was targeting its rivals, prompting Eric to respond with a passionate defense of his father. He listed numerous accusations against Biden, asserting that the Trump family has not engaged in the same tactics they face. Eric's emphatic questions highlighted his belief that his father is the real victim in the political landscape.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Chris Cuomo has an uncomfortable moment on-air as he sets Eric Trump OFF into a rage over his comments about Trump going after his political opponents. This did not sit well with Eric, who blew up on Cuomo for nearly 3 minutes straight. CUOMO: “Do you think that it is fair to say it looks like the administration is going after its political opponents now and doing exactly what you say you oppose?” TRUMP: “What, Comey?… It certainly seemed like he lied to me. I’m also wondering what an FBI director is doing taking memos from the FBI and leaking them to The New York Times.” That’s when Trump got personal, accusing Cuomo of playing coy even though his own family had also faced political lawfare. Cuomo pushed back, insisting he wasn’t being coy... before accusing the Trump administration of going “right after Biden.” Eric Trump then rattled off a series of examples to prove that his father is the victim, not the aggressor, in what can only be described as a mic-drop moment: • “Did we raid Biden’s home?” • “Did we try and bankrupt Biden?” • “Did we weaponize every AG and DA against Biden?” • “Did we do that against Hunter Biden, who had a laptop from hell, pictures of cocaine, illicit drug use, prostitution?” • “Did we make up a dirty dossier about Biden?” • “Did they try and destroy Biden’s marriage?” • “Did we make up stories that Biden had secret servers in the basement of his home communicating with the Kremlin in Russia?” • “Did we strip Biden off the ballot of multiple states?” • “Did we take Biden off of Twitter and Instagram and Facebook and try and silence his voice so he couldn’t communicate?” • “Did we put Biden in a courtroom every single day, 91 felony counts that have all been overturned for my father now for nonsense, to try and keep him off of a campaign trail and to try and destroy his life. DID WE DO ANY OF THAT?”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 argues the administration is targeting its political opponents and notes, "it seemed very clear to me in congressional the testimony," asking, "what an FBI director is doing, taking memos from the FBI and leaking them to the New York Times." He claims "the very same people that were coming after us ... went after your brother" and that "They were trying to destroy my father. They were trying to destroy me, and they were trying to destroy the Trump organization." Speaker 0 says he's not playing coy and asks if what's happening now resembles what happened to him. Speaker 1 fires a barrage: "Did we raid Biden's home?" "Did we weaponize every AG and DA, you know, against Biden?" "Did we put Biden in a courtroom every single day, 91 felony counts that have all been overturned for my father now, right, for nonsense to try and destroy his life?"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think that it is fair to say it looks like the administration is going after its political opponents now and doing exactly what you say you oppose? Speaker 1: Uh-oh. That's that what? You told me? Be because, I mean, it it seemed very clear to me in in in congressional the testimony. I don't know just watching it. I I certainly seem like he lied to me. I mean, I'm also wondering what an FBI director is doing, taking memos from the FBI and leaking them to the New York Times. I mean, Chris, I'd be I I was I'm guy a that hopes that the FBI director would be keeping planes from flying into buildings, you know, keeping our country safe, keeping the western way of life safe. Instead, this guy is, you know, communicating every single day with with the New York Times. I mean, I'd hope lot better, but I I find it so ironic that you're literally one that's pushing back on the weaponization of government when the very same people that were coming after us, you know, went after your brother, you know, like hounds. I mean, they they did everything they could to destroy his governorship. They did everything they could to destroy his life. They did everything they could to destroy you. I sat in that same seat. The only difference is my last name wasn't Cuomo. My last name was Trump. They were trying to destroy my father. And by doing that, they were trying to destroy me, and they were trying to destroy the Trump organization. They were trying trying to take all our assets and strip our name off of every building in New York City. You've been on the receiving end of the very same people that I've been on the receiving end of. And so to play coy with me as if this isn't happening in The United States Of America just seems ironic and and and foolish given what you've been through more so than anybody. Speaker 0: Hold on a second. What did you just say that you think I'm doing? I'm asking you questions about whether or not if something is wrong, it is also wrong to do the same thing when you get back in power, which certainly happened the first time the administration came in. You went right after Biden. And I don't mean you. You weren't part of the administration. I'll get to you in a second in terms of what's going on right now. But if you think I'm playing coy, you don't know me as well as you should. Chris. I'm not playing coy. I know what happened to me. Chris, did we keep saying that what is happening now looks like what was done to you. That's why I'm asking the question. Speaker 1: Did we raid Biden's home? You know, did we did we try and bankrupt Biden? Did they come after us? Did we weaponize every AG and DA, you know, against Biden? Do do we do that against Hunter Biden who had a laptop from hell, pictures of cocaine, illicit drug use, prostitution? You know, did did we did we do that? Did we make up a dirty dossier about Biden? Did they try and destroy Biden's marriage? You know, was any of that true? I mean, did did we make up stories that Biden had secret servers in the basement of his home communicating with the Kremlin in in in Russia? You know, did we strip Biden off the ballot of multiple states? Did we take Biden off of Twitter and Instagram and Facebook and and try and silence his voice so he couldn't communicate? Did we put Biden in a courtroom every single day, 91 felony counts that have all been overturned for my father now, right, for for nonsense to try and keep him off of a campaign trail and to try and destroy his life. You know, do we Speaker 0: do Speaker 1: any of that?
Saved - September 30, 2025 at 10:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I addressed various topics in recent posts. I called out a young liberal for misrepresenting Charlie Kirk's views on the Civil Rights Act. I shared Tucker Carlson's reaction to Wikipedia's blacklist of sources, highlighting the disparity in what is deemed reliable. Bobby Kennedy discussed environmental causes of rising childhood cancers, while Bill O'Reilly revealed Disney's capitulation to Hollywood pressure regarding Jimmy Kimmel. Keir Starmer struggled to justify the need for digital IDs, and I reported on Trump's drug price negotiations with Pfizer. Additionally, I noted RFK Jr.'s comments on media influence and highlighted a new film addressing health issues in America. Lastly, I mentioned Secretary Hegseth's initiative for military fitness standards.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Chris Cuomo unexpectedly SHUTS DOWN young liberal pushing false claims about Charlie Kirk. “You’re about to make the AOC mistake.” Adam Mockler claimed Kirk believed the Civil Rights Act NEVER should have been passed. But to his dismay, Cuomo immediately pushed back and set the record straight on what Kirk really believed. MOCKLER: “This is a dude who repeatedly said the Civil Rights Act shouldn’t have been passed.” CUOMO: “No, not at the same time. Two things. You’re about to make the AOC mistake… Charlie Kirk never said the Civil Rights Act [shouldn’t have been passed]… What he said was, Civil Rights Act: good. Needed it. Great.” MOCKLER: “No.” CUOMO: “Was then used to inculcate DEI and do these other things by extension of that law that he was against, and that it should have never been used for those purposes… to make it as an extension of a welfare program for blacks in every manifestation that he was against.” MOCKLER: “No, I’ve heard him make that argument.” CUOMO: “He didn’t say get rid of it.” MOCKLER: “He said they never should have passed it. He said that, right?” CUOMO: “No. I don’t think he did say that. I think what he said was what they did with it made it a mistake.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Charlie Kirk shouldn't have gotten shot. Obviously, that's terrible. But this is a dude who repeatedly said the civil rights act shouldn't have been passed. You're about to make the AOC mistake. Charlie Kirk never said the civil rights act. I've studied this very deeply. And it's just pretty simple. It'll take you five minutes. It's not what he said. I've looked it up. I've it up. He said was civil rights act, good. Needed it. Great. No. Was then used to inculcate DEI and do these other things by extension of that law that he was against and that it should have never been used for those purposes, not to help black people vote. That's he believed in. But to make it as an extension of a of a welfare program for blacks in every manifestation, that he was against. Yep. Now I happen to disagree. I actually think it was necessary. Nope. I've heard him make that argument. He didn't say get rid of it. I didn't say he said get rid of it. He said they never should have passed it in the first place. And he made arg. Also No. I don't think he did say that. I think what he said was the way that they what they did with it made it a mistake.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Charlie Kirk shouldn't have gotten shot. Obviously, that's terrible. He got, like, publicly executed. It was f it was terrible. But at the same time, this is a dude who repeatedly said the civil rights act shouldn't have Speaker 1: been passed. No. Not at the same time. Two things. Yeah. You're about to make the AOC mistake. Charlie Kirk never said the civil rights act. I've studied this very deeply. And it's just pretty simple. It'll take you five minutes. It's not what he said. I've looked it up. I've it up. He said was civil rights act, good. Needed it. Great. No. Was then used to inculcate DEI and do these other things by extension of that law that he was against and that it should have never been used for those purposes, not to help black people vote. That's he believed in. But to make it as an extension of a of a welfare program for blacks in every manifestation, that he was against. Yep. Now I happen to disagree. I actually think it was necessary. Nope. I've heard him make that argument. He didn't say get rid of it. Heard him make that argument. Speaker 0: I didn't say he said get rid of it. He said they never should have passed it. And he also used he said that, right, they never should have passed it in the first place. And he made arg Speaker 1: also No. I don't think he did say that. I think what he said was the way that they what they did with it made it a mistake.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

STORY #9 - #9 - Tucker Carlson bursts out laughing as Wikipedia’s Co-Founder Larry Sanger shows him the website’s BLACKLIST of banned sources. “It’s so funny. This is amazing.” Once you see which websites count as “reliable” and which are excluded, you’ll be laughing alongside Carlson. BLACKLISTED: • Breitbart • Daily Caller • Epoch Times • Fox News • New York Post • The Federalist GREEN-LIT: • New York Times • Washington Post • CNN • MSNBC • The Nation • Mother Jones • GLAAD • TV Guide

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker explains how to find Wikipedia's blacklist by typing perennial sources, Wikipedia into any search engine; the first result is the page, and it names them the blacklist. It’s color coded: Green means fully approved; red means blacklisted. Fully greenlit sources include New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, The Nation, Mother Jones, GLAAD. Blacklisted sources include Breitbart, Daily Caller, Epic Times, Fox News, New York Post, The Federalist. Red means it's blacklisted; you cannot cite it as a source of facts, maybe as a source of opinion. Anti defamationally gets a green light, only for some; if you're actually reporting about the Arab-Israeli conflict, you may not cite them. You can't find the Jewish perspective on the war so easily anymore on Wikipedia. Catholic hierarchy celebrity. There's a serious academic encyclopedia of Christianity that is not allowed on Wikipedia. Daily Caller not allowed. Life site news not allowed. Sputnik not allowed. TV Guide allowed. The Uns review not allowed. Mister x is the name of his account; it’s edited by a whole bunch of other people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can I go on the Wikipedia site and find out what's blacklisted? Speaker 1: Sure. Just just type in perennial sources, Wikipedia into any search engine, and the first result will be this page. Speaker 0: And it it names them the blacklist? Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Of course. Yeah. It's all it's all color coded. Green. Speaker 0: Do you have the list? Do you mind if I do that really quick? Speaker 1: Go right ahead. Speaker 0: Okay. So it's let me just do I just want I'm testing your thesis. So it's perennial Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: Source Yeah. Lists Wikipedia. Right? Speaker 1: While you're doing that, I'll I'll give you some fully approved sources. New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, The Nation, Mother Jones, GLAAD. Speaker 0: Come on. Speaker 1: These are all greenlit, fully greenlit. Okay. The blacklisted sources are Breitbart, Daily Caller, Epic Times, Fox News, New York Post, The Federalist. So you can't use those as sources on Wikipedia. Speaker 0: Oh, wow. Well, they've got of course. So is red I'm looking at it now. Speaker 1: Yes. Red means it's blacklisted. You cannot cite it as a source of facts. Maybe as a source of opinion, but generally, that works out. Speaker 0: Anti defamationally gets a green light. Speaker 1: Only for some. Yes. If you're actually reporting about the about the Arab Speaker 0: Israeli conflict? Yes. Yes. Okay. Speaker 1: You may not cite them. Speaker 0: Interesting. Speaker 1: So you can't you can't find the Jewish perspective on the war so easily anymore on Wikipedia. Speaker 0: Yeah. Catholic hierarchy celebrity. This is interesting. Speaker 1: Yes. There's a a serious academic encyclopedia of Christianity that is not allowed on Wikipedia. I was surprised to find that. Speaker 0: Is not allowed. Oh, they're naughty. They're naughty. Daily Caller not allowed. Speaker 1: Of course. Oh. You started the Daily Speaker 0: Mail not yeah. I did start it. I've got nothing to do with it now, but I did start it. That's interesting. Well, this is kind of incredible. Okay. I never hear about this. And we don't know who made this decision. Speaker 1: Mister x is the name of his account. Oh, now he it's edited, of course, as Wikipedia pages are by a whole bunch of other people. Speaker 0: Life site news not allowed. Right? Of course, the pro lifers. Yeah. That's interesting. I'm gonna see if this okay. Well, why does no one talk about this? Oh, Sputnik, of course, not allowed. Tucky man. Speaker 1: Search me. I don't know why people aren't talking about it. It's it's obviously huge news. I think it's it's simply embarrassing for the left, and so the left aren't going to report about it, and the the right has been reporting about it. Speaker 0: TV Guide allowed. The Uns review not allowed. TV Guide totally cool. Uns. V dare not allow. This is so funny. This is amazing. Okay. Alright.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#8 - Secretary Bobby Kennedy says the Trump administration “FOR THE FIRST TIME” is researching environmental causes of certain cancers rising in children. “[Some cancers] NEVER affected children before, and suddenly are epidemic! We’re gonna find the causes. They’re environmental causes. We’re gonna identify them, and work to ELIMINATE them.” Credit: @EricLDaugh

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speakers discuss the origins of a health trend and strategies to address it, emphasizing a first-time research effort and potential expert input from Jay Bhattachar. The dialogue highlights an urgent concern about cancers in children and a commitment to identify environmental factors. 'We're doing that research now for the first time.' They mention that Jay Bhattachar can talk about that. 'The focus is on that, in particular, colon cancers and these cancers that have suddenly that never affected children before and suddenly are epidemic in our children.' 'And we're gonna find the causes, their environmental causes, work and identify them and work to eliminate.' The exchange ends with 'Alright. Thanks. Thanks, Bob.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Years. Do they know why that do they have any idea why that's happening? Speaker 1: Doing that research, and Jay Bhattachar can talk about that. We're doing that research now for the first time. We're focusing on that, in particular, colon cancers and these cancers that have suddenly that never affected children before and suddenly are epidemic in our children. And we're gonna find the causes, their environmental causes, work and identify them and work to eliminate Speaker 0: them. Alright. Thanks. Thanks, Bob.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#7 - Bill O’Reilly reveals the real reason Disney caved and put Jimmy Kimmel back on the air. Hint: “It had nothing to do with freedom of speech at all.” “The Journal today lays out what I said… the talent agencies in Los Angeles, all left wing, 100%, threatened Disney and Bob Iger and said, ‘If you don’t put Kimmel back on the air, a lot of our clients are not going to do business with you’… Iger surrendered on the spot, and then Kimmel went back.” “Now think about that. Think about the power that the left in Hollywood has to bring a company like Disney to its knees.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's an article in The Wall Street Journal today about, Kimmel. And I said this last week on News Nation that this Kimmel suspension and then reinsertment into the ABC lineup wasn't what the press was reporting. It had nothing to do with freedom of speech at all. And the journal today, lays out what I said last week, is that the talent agencies in Los Angeles, all left wing, 100%, threatened Disney and Bob Iger and said, if you don't put Kenmel back on the air, a lot of our clients are not gonna do business with you. That means you're not gonna get actors and producers and writers and directors. Take it to another studio. Eiger surrendered on the spot, and then Kimmel went back. Now think about that. Think about the power that the left in Hollywood has to bring a company like Disney to its knees
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's an article in The Wall Street Journal today about, Kimmel. And I said this last week on News Nation that this Kimmel suspension and then reinsertment into the ABC lineup wasn't what the press was reporting. It had nothing to do with freedom of speech at all. And the journal today, lays out what I said last week, is that the talent agencies in Los Angeles, all left wing, 100%, threatened Disney and Bob Iger and said, if you don't put Kenmel back on the air, a lot of our clients are not gonna do business with you. That means you're not gonna get actors and producers and writers and directors. Take it to another studio. Eiger surrendered on the spot, and then Kimmel went back. Now think about that. Think about the power that the left in Hollywood has to bring a company like Disney to its knees

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#6 - Keir Starmer struggles to come up with a legitimate reason why Digital IDs are needed to combat illegal immigration in Britain. “There’s no point in people saying to me, ‘Why do we need it?’” He scorned. Journalist @shellenberger writes: “Gas-lighting in the extreme. Asked three separate times why digital IDs are suddenly somehow necessary to stop illegal migration, @Keir_Starmer offers Kamala-level word salad:  “You must have mandatory digital ID in order to work because we have to stop illegal working.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
"absolutely convinced that amongst the reasons that people travel through France, which is a safe country, to come to The United Kingdom, amongst the reasons is because it's easier to work in our legal economy than it is in other countries." "Bosses who are prepared to hire people illegally are not asking them for their national insurance card." "You must have ID, mandatory digital ID in order to work because we have to stop illegal working." "It is an automatic collection of the information by the government, so we know exactly who is working in our economy, and it will help us enforce the rules that are there." "I made a pledge that we would do whatever was necessary, pull use whatever tools, were available to deal with illegal migration. I intend to do so."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of our viewers got in touch and wanted us to ask this question. Russ Brown wanted us to ask you if you really believe that those profiting from human trafficking will think, oh, dear. I have to check your digital ID now. I can't carry on paying you £1.50 an hour to work in I'm my Speaker 1: absolutely convinced that amongst the reasons that people travel through France, which is a safe country, to come to The United Kingdom, amongst the reasons is because it's easier to work in our legal economy than it is in other countries. Bosses we have to deal with Speaker 0: Bosses who are prepared to hire people illegally are not asking them for their national insurance card. So what's the evidence? What makes you think they're suddenly going to ask them for a digital ID Speaker 1: that We need they to be really clear. You must have ID, mandatory digital ID in order to work because we have to stop illegal working. If you look at any of the raids, we've we've massively increased the number of raids on working premises. It is absolutely clear that people are working illegally in numbers But why do you think them having Speaker 0: a digital ID having to have a digital ID would stop that problem when right now people are meant to have a national insurance number and card? And if they're not asked for that, a boss is willing already to break the rules. What's the difference going to be? Speaker 1: Well, the difference is this is on point of starting, not a retrospective exercise as it now is. It is an automatic collection of the information by the government, so we know exactly who is working in our economy, and it will help us enforce the rules that are there. But there's no point people saying to me why do we need it when we all acknowledge there is a problem. People are working illegally in our economy. It is amongst the reasons that people want to come to The United Kingdom. We have to deal with that. I made a pledge that we would do whatever was necessary, pull use whatever tools, were available to deal with illegal migration. I intend to do so.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@shellenberger Before we get to the next story: if you’re not following me, you may be missing out on critical updates. Hit the bell 🔔 so you don’t miss the inconvenient truths the media hopes you’ll never see. → @VigilantFox

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@shellenberger #5 - Chaos Erupts at School Board Meeting as Conservative Mom STRIPS to Protest Woke Bathroom Policy https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/watch-chaos-erupts-at-school-board

WATCH: Chaos Erupts at School Board Meeting as Conservative Mom STRIPS to Protest Woke Bathroom Policy She wanted board members to understand how vulnerable students feel when classmates choose a locker room based on gender identity instead of assigned sex at birth. vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@shellenberger #4 - Megyn Kelly Says She Knows How to Fix Illegal Immigration Crisis ‘Overnight’ https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/megyn-kelly-says-she-knows-how-to

Megyn Kelly Says She Knows How to Fix Illegal Immigration Crisis 'Overnight' She has a point. vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#3 - Trump tells Pfizer CEO to his face that he is “surprised” he is agreeing to massive price cuts to his company’s drugs. Albert Bourla smiled and stood silently as Trump announced news that axes his profit margins in America. Pfizer will now be selling prescription drugs to Medicaid at the “most favored nation’s prices.” This means that the company must match the lowest price it offers anywhere in the world. For decades, Americans have been charged far more for the same medications sold cheaper overseas. Now, Pfizer will be forced to align U.S. prices with the lowest global rate for Medicaid patients There are about 72 million people enrolled in Medicaid in the U.S. today. This will save taxpayers a fortune.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#2 - RFK Jr. delivers a blunt explanation of who Anderson Cooper’s “real boss” is. Hint: It’s not CNN. “I think Anderson Cooper makes about $20 million, give or take. If you say he’s got a $20 million salary and 75% of that or 80% of that is coming from the pharmaceutical companies (running non-stop ads), that’s who his real boss is.” “Brought to you by Pfizer.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Particularly the new evening news shows are just bracketed one after the other by pharmaceutical ads. Brought to you by Pfizer. Making a difference. Brought to you by Pfizer. CNN tonight. Brought to you by Pfizer. Anderson Cooper three sixty brought to you by Pfizer. And so, you know, you look at somebody like Anderson Cooper, I think Anderson Cooper makes about $20,000,000, you know, give or take. If you say he's got a $20,000,000 salary and 75% of that or 80% of that is coming from the pharmaceutical companies, that's who his real boss is.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Particularly the new evening news shows are just bracketed one after the other by pharmaceutical ads. Brought to you by Pfizer. Making a difference. Brought to you by Pfizer. CNN tonight. Brought to you by Pfizer. Anderson Cooper three sixty brought to you by Pfizer. And so, you know, you look at somebody like Anderson Cooper, I think Anderson Cooper makes about $20,000,000, you know, give or take. If you say he's got a $20,000,000 salary and 75% of that or 80% of that is coming from the pharmaceutical companies, that's who his real boss is.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@shellenberger #ad: The above clip comes from an eye-opening new film by @TTAVOfficial. If you’ve wondered why Americans are sicker than ever — and why no one stopped it — this film lays it all out. You can watch it now for free here. https://unpackthelies.com/fox

Unpacking The Lies We've Been Fed New Documentary Coming Soon unpackingthelies.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#1 - Secretary of War Pete Hegseth NUKES fat generals and announces a new twice-yearly PT test for top brass. “It’s unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals in the halls of the Pentagon, and leading all around the world. It’s a BAD LOOK, and it’s not who we are!” “You need to meet the height and weight standards.” “Today, at my direction, every member of the Joint Force at every rank is required to take the PT test twice a year, as well as meet height and weight requirements twice a year. EVERY year of service.” Credit: @EricLDaugh

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker cites fitness and appearance standards for the joint force, calling fat troops and fat generals a bad look. "With physical fitness and appearance. If the secretary of war can do regular hard PT, so can every member of our joint force." "It's not who we are" and that, regardless of rank—from "airborne ranger or a chairborne ranger," to "a brand new private or four star general"—"you must meet the height and weight standards and pass your PT test." "As the chairman said, yes, there is no PT test," but then directs: "every member of the joint force at every rank is required to take a PT test twice a year, as well as meet height and weight requirements twice a year, every year of service." "Every warrior across our joint force is required to do PT every duty day." "Should be common sense. I mean, units do that already."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With physical fitness and appearance. If the secretary of war can do regular hard PT, so can every member of our joint force. Frankly, it's tiring to look out at combat formations or really any formation and see fat troops. Likewise, it's completely unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals in the halls of the Pentagon and leading commands around the country and the world. It's a bad look. It is bad, and it's not who we are. So whether you're an airborne ranger or a chairborne ranger, a brand new private or a four star general, you need to meet the height and weight standards and pass your PT test. And as the chairman said, yes, there is no PT test. But today, at my direction, every member of the joint force at every rank is required to take a PT test twice a year, as well as meet height and weight requirements twice a year, every year of service. Also today at my direction, every warrior across our joint force is required to do PT every duty day. Should be common sense. I mean, units do that already.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@shellenberger @TTAVOfficial BONUS #1 - EXCLUSIVE: Rep. Wesley Hunt Pulls Back the Curtain on the Real President Trump https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/exclusive-rep-wesley-hunt-pulls-back

EXCLUSIVE: Rep. Wesley Hunt Pulls Back the Curtain on the Real President Trump To some, Trump is the leader America needs. To others, he’s the ultimate villain. But Rep. Hunt shares a rare, behind-the-scenes moment that shows a side of Trump few people ever get to witness. vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@shellenberger @TTAVOfficial BONUS #2 - “You Pissed Off the Wrong Daddy!”: Father of Woman Executed by Career Criminal GOES OFF on Democrats https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/you-pissed-off-the-wrong-daddy-father

"You Pissed Off the Wrong Daddy!": Father of Woman Executed by Career Criminal GOES OFF on Democrats This should infuriate every American. vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@shellenberger @TTAVOfficial BONUS #3 - The Greatest Lie Ever Told About Heart Disease https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/the-greatest-lie-ever-told-about

The Greatest Lie Ever Told About Heart Disease If someone you love is on these drugs, read this before it’s too late. vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@shellenberger @TTAVOfficial BONUS #4 - Bill Maher’s Unexpected Rant Targets a Crisis Ignored by the Media https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/bill-mahers-unexpected-rant-targets

Bill Maher’s Unexpected Rant Targets a Crisis Ignored by the Media “Where are the kids protesting this?” vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@shellenberger @TTAVOfficial BONUS #5 - The #1 Sound Your Brain Desperately Wants to Hear https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/the-300-year-old-secret-to-a-better

The #1 Sound Your Brain Secretly Wants to Hear This timeless practice has remarkable benefits for the human mind. vigilantfox.com
Saved - September 30, 2025 at 8:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I couldn't help but laugh when Larry Sanger revealed Wikipedia's blacklist of banned sources. It's astonishing to see which websites are deemed "reliable" and which are excluded. The contrast is striking, with familiar names like Breitbart and Fox News on the blacklist.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Tucker Carlson bursts out laughing as Wikipedia’s Co-Founder Larry Sanger shows him the website’s BLACKLIST of banned sources. “It’s so funny. This is amazing.” Once you see which websites count as “reliable” and which are excluded, you’ll be laughing alongside Carlson. BLACKLISTED: • Breitbart • Daily Caller • Epoch Times • Fox News • New York Post • The Federalist GREEN-LIT: • New York Times • Washington Post • CNN • MSNBC • The Nation • Mother Jones • GLAAD • TV Guide

Video Transcript AI Summary
"New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, The Nation, Mother Jones, GLAAD." "Breitbart, Daily Caller, Epic Times, Fox News, New York Post, The Federalist." "Anti defamationally gets a green light." "Only for some. Yes. If you're reporting about the about the Arab Israeli conflict? Yes. You may not cite them." "You can't you can't find the Jewish perspective on the war so easily anymore on Wikipedia." "There is a a serious academic encyclopedia of Christianity that is not allowed on Wikipedia." "Daily Caller not allowed." "Life site news not allowed." "Sputnik, of course, not allowed." "TV Guide allowed." "The Uns review not allowed." "TV Guide totally cool." "Uns. V dare not allow." "Mister x is the name of his account." "This is obviously huge news."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can I go on the Wikipedia site and find out what's blacklisted? Speaker 1: Sure. Just just type in perennial sources, Wikipedia into any search engine, and the first result will be this page. Speaker 0: And it it names them the blacklist? Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Of course. Yeah. It's all it's all color coded. Green. Speaker 0: Do you have the list? Do you mind if I do that really quick? Speaker 1: Go right ahead. Speaker 0: Okay. So it's let me just do I just want I'm testing your thesis. So it's perennial Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: Source Yeah. Lists Wikipedia. Right? Speaker 1: While you're doing that, I'll I'll give you some fully approved sources. New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, The Nation, Mother Jones, GLAAD. Speaker 0: Come on. Speaker 1: These are all greenlit, fully greenlit. Okay. The blacklisted sources are Breitbart, Daily Caller, Epic Times, Fox News, New York Post, The Federalist. So you can't use those as sources on Wikipedia. Speaker 0: Oh, wow. Well, they've got of course. So is red I'm looking at it now. Speaker 1: Yes. Red means it's blacklisted. You cannot cite it as a source of facts. Maybe as a source of opinion, but generally, that works out. Speaker 0: Anti defamationally gets a green light. Speaker 1: Only for some. Yes. If you're actually reporting about the about the Arab Speaker 0: Israeli conflict? Yes. Yes. Okay. Speaker 1: You may not cite them. Speaker 0: Interesting. Speaker 1: So you can't you can't find the Jewish perspective on the war so easily anymore on Wikipedia. Speaker 0: Yeah. Catholic hierarchy celebrity. This is interesting. Speaker 1: Yes. There's a a serious academic encyclopedia of Christianity that is not allowed on Wikipedia. I was surprised to find that. Speaker 0: Is not allowed. Oh, they're naughty. They're naughty. Daily Caller not allowed. Speaker 1: Of course. Oh. You started the Daily Speaker 0: Mail not yeah. I did start it. I've got nothing to do with it now, but I did start it. That's interesting. Well, this is kind of incredible. Okay. I never hear about this. And we don't know who made this decision. Speaker 1: Mister x is the name of his account. Oh, now he it's edited, of course, as Wikipedia pages are by a whole bunch of other people. Speaker 0: Life site news not allowed. Right? Of course, the pro lifers. Yeah. That's interesting. I'm gonna see if this okay. Well, why does no one talk about this? Oh, Sputnik, of course, not allowed. Tucky man. Speaker 1: Search me. I don't know why people aren't talking about it. It's it's obviously huge news. I think it's it's simply embarrassing for the left, and so the left aren't going to report about it, and the the right has been reporting about it. Speaker 0: TV Guide allowed. The Uns review not allowed. TV Guide totally cool. Uns. V dare not allow. This is so funny. This is amazing. Okay. Alright.
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 9:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Before Trump's vaccine remarks, many parents didn't question vaccine safety. Research reveals potential risks, like the HPV vaccine possibly increasing cancer risk and mass vaccination campaigns causing paralysis in children. Vaccines are often marketed as safe, but many don't prevent infections and can have serious side effects, which are frequently overlooked. The narrative around "vaccine preventable" diseases is exaggerated, and natural infections may offer better immunity. The current vaccination approach ignores individual health differences and can lead to significant harm.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Before Donald Trump declared “NO ALUMINUM” and “NO MERCURY” in vaccines, most parents never questioned what could happen to their kids. They didn’t know the HPV vaccine could raise cancer risk by 44.6% in women with existing infections. Or that 491,000 children in India were paralyzed after a mass polio vaccination campaign funded by Bill Gates. This is the vaccine breakdown they never wanted you to see. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and eye-opening details, read the full article below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-are-the-risks-and-benefits-of

What are the risks and benefits of each vaccine? The COVID-19 vaccines have provided a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to answer this question. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

If you think vaccines are perfect, you’ve bought into a myth. Vaccines are marketed as safe and effective silver bullets. But many don’t prevent infection, fail to stop transmission, and carry real, underreported risks. The bar for justifying most vaccines is nowhere near as high as it should be.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The real risk of “vaccine preventable” diseases is wildly overblown. We vaccinate against illnesses that are rare, mild, and/or easily treatable. Smallpox, polio, diphtheria—virtually nonexistent. Chickenpox? Harmless for healthy kids. And the entire fear campaign is built on outdated data and exaggerated, if not completely false, horror stories. The fearmongering has been so effective, we’re vaccinating everyone like it’s still the 1920s. News flash: it’s not.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Many vaccines don’t even work as promised. The HPV vaccine was supposed to prevent cancer, but real-world data shows it may actually increase cancer risk in some. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-hpv-vaccine-disaster-was-a-test

The HPV Vaccine Tragedy Was A Test Run For COVID-19 A review of the incredible dangers of the HPV vaccine and the unscrupulous campaign that forced it upon the world midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc That’s downright disturbing. And COVID? The more shots you take, the higher your risk of infection. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/another-covid-19-conspiracy-theory

Another COVID-19 "Conspiracy Theory" Comes True! Yearly ineffective and unsafe COVID-19 vaccines epitomize the pharmaceutical business model. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Vaccine immunity fades fast, but the risks don’t. A @MidwesternDoc's deep-dive explores the real risks and benefits of each vaccine. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-are-the-risks-and-benefits-of

What are the risks and benefits of each vaccine? The COVID-19 vaccines have provided a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to answer this question. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc With the COVID shot, protection drops after just 3 months, leading to endless boosters. Each new dose piles on more risk—including autoimmunity, microstrokes, and unknown long-term damage. And having antibodies doesn’t actually guarantee immunity.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Vaccines put pressure on viruses to evolve. Read that again and let it sink in. When a vaccine “works,” it creates selective pressure that forces new variants to emerge. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-each

What are the Pros and Cons of Each Type of Vaccine? Knowing how vaccines work is necessary for understanding which ones are likely to help and which ones are likely to harm. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc We’ve seen it with COVID, pertussis, pneumococcus, and Hib—in some cases making the disease worse than before. How is that helpful?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Science clearly shows that natural infection is often safer and stronger. Diseases like measles, mumps, and chickenpox can even train the immune system to fight cancer and chronic illness. Vaccination can rob the body of that natural defense and leave it vulnerable later in life!

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Vaccinating while sick can make infections deadly. Merck’s own data showed HPV-vaccinated women with pre-existing HPV had a 44.6% higher cancer risk. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-perils-of-vaccinating-when-you

The Perils of Vaccinating When You Are Infected What the forgotten HPV vaccine tragedy can teach us about the dangers of COVID vaccination midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc This pattern shows up again and again—including with COVID, flu, polio, and typhoid. And yet children with runny noses and congestion are vaccinated daily.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Side effects aren’t rare. They’re just ignored. Chronic illness has exploded alongside the rise of mass vaccination. But we’re told it’s just a coincidence. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-are-the-risks-and-benefits-of

What are the risks and benefits of each vaccine? The COVID-19 vaccines have provided a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to answer this question. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Most vaccine side effects aren’t immediate or even obvious. They manifest as autoimmune disease, neurological disorders, chronic fatigue—issues doctors don’t link back to the shot. Rates of these illnesses exploded after major vaccine rollouts in 1986 and 2021.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Doctors are trained not to see vaccine injuries. Injuries that scream “vaccine damage” are dismissed as behavioral, psychiatric, or “just bad luck.” Simply trying to connect the dots can destroy a doctor’s career. What happened to the Hippocratic Oath?!

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Did you know that vaccine manufacturing is wildly inconsistent? Vaccine “hot lots” have caused mass injury events for over a century. Operation Warp Speed only made it worse. Quality control was sacrificed for speed—and people paid the price without being warned of the risks.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Some vaccines actually suppress immunity. The DTP vaccine was found to increase child mortality by weakening the immune system. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-century-of-evidence-that-vaccines

The Century of Evidence That Vaccines Cause Sudden Infant Deaths The Disturbing Parallels between Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and Sudden Adult Death Syndrome midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc COVID shots have been linked to exploding cancer rates and bizarre immune dysfunctions typically seen in AIDS patients. Yikes.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Circulation damage is a key mechanism of vaccine harm. Microclots. Mini-strokes. Brain fog. One theory to explain this is that vaccines impair zeta potential, disrupting blood flow and sparking neurological injury. This would explain much of what we’re seeing with the COVID shot.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Autoimmune priming is real—and dangerous. When vaccines contain proteins that mimic your body, the immune system ends up turning on itself. This is what happened with Gardasil. And the COVID shots, too. They may be the worst offenders yet.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The more vaccines you receive, the worse it gets. Cumulative damage is real. Multiple shots magnify the risk, especially when given together. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-are-the-risks-and-benefits-of

What are the risks and benefits of each vaccine? The COVID-19 vaccines have provided a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to answer this question. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Spacing vaccines out could prevent thousands of injuries. But the CDC won’t even consider it. Parents who want to space or delay vaccines have to prepare to go into battle when visiting the pediatrician.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Some exemptions can be nearly impossible to get. Even people who go into anaphylactic shock are told to just “try another brand.” Excuse me?! And doctors who do write exemptions risk losing their licenses. This isn’t medicine. It’s coercion.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Public health doesn’t treat you like a person. To them you’re just data. One-size-fits-all policy ignores genetic, immune, and lifestyle differences. It also gaslights anyone who gets hurt.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc They call it herd immunity. But it’s more like a treadmill. Chickenpox and measles were once harmless childhood illnesses. But now? We rely on endless boosters to stay protected in the U.S.—because vaccine-induced immunity completely destroyed the natural kind.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc COVID and Gardasil are the two worst offenders. COVID-19 shots have killed or injured millions globally. Gardasil may kill 89 people to save just 2—while also leaving thousands with autoimmune disease. That’s insanity. Pure and simple. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-are-the-risks-and-benefits-of

What are the risks and benefits of each vaccine? The COVID-19 vaccines have provided a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to answer this question. midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Other dangerous vaccines include DTP/DTaP, Flu, Hepatitis B, and MMR. Each has a poor risk-benefit ratio, frequent adverse effects, and weak scientific justification. And even the “better” ones still have risks. Rotavirus, shingles, and hepatitis B (for high-risk adults) vaccines may have a debatable benefit—though safer alternatives often exist for these, too. Keep scrolling for a breakdown of each one…

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The original DTP was so toxic it caused widespread brain damage and death in infants. DTaP is “less toxic,” but still linked to ear infections and serious reactions. And pertussis outbreaks still happen—because the vaccine doesn’t prevent colonization. https://t.co/LP9UhQd4ON

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Tetanus is rare. Fewer people die from Tetanus than lightning strikes. Plus, there’s no definitive proof the vaccine even works! Yet it’s bundled with diphtheria and pertussis, making it impossible to opt out selectively. And wait… where’s the vaccine or lightning strikes?! https://t.co/A9i7UsGfUC

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The Hepatitis B vaccine is given at birth—but why? It’s a bloodborne disease that isn’t spread in infancy. What’s worse is that it’s been tied to autoimmune conditions and even sudden infant death. It is hands down one of the least justifiable vaccines on the schedule. https://t.co/ZAAYNo422a

Saved - September 23, 2025 at 10:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared some alarming updates about global trends in digital control and health regulations. Vietnam's recent shutdown of 86 million bank accounts for non-compliance with biometric data requests highlights a growing pattern of state-enforced control. The UK is also pushing for a digital ID that could restrict access to essential services, mirroring Australia’s trajectory. Additionally, the FDA's admission regarding the lack of testing for COVID-19 vaccine DNA fragments raises serious concerns about regulatory oversight. Stay informed and support local economies.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

DISTURBING: Vietnam just shut down a jaw-dropping 86 MILLION bank accounts overnight, cutting citizens off from their own money for refusing to hand over their biometric data. This is state-enforced digital control, showing just how fast freedom disappears when survival is tied to compliance. Dr. Andrew Kaufman warns Americans not to assume it “can’t happen here.” With REAL ID rolling out and Palantir-linked surveillance expanding, the same playbook is already underway on American soil. In Vietnam, people had “a few months’ warning,” then watched their accounts freeze. Most complied without protest. And that same passive mindset is spreading in the U.S. today. Make no mistake: this is a global test run for total control. The only defense is building a parallel economy—now. Support for local businesses, the use of cash, and holding gold and silver are a must. Because once the switch flips here, our freedom won’t come back. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v6zbql2-uk-to-launch-digital-id-86m-bank-accounts-shut-down-fdas-shock-admission-da.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vietnam deactivated 86,000,000 bank accounts overnight. Individuals who failed to submit biometric data were immediately denied access to their money. Doctor Andrew Kaufman warns this is not speculation. This is applied state level biometric enforcement. He says, "don't assume this is too extreme to happen here," noting "the rollout of Real ID and advanced surveillance technologies, including systems linked to Palantir contracts under the current administration, the same methodology is entirely feasible in The United States." "What they did to enforce this is they closed 86,000,000 bank accounts and seized all of the assets in those accounts." "This is not something that is gonna stay in Vietnam." "This is a test because if we look at for example, what's going on with the European Central Bank and digital ID initiative in Europe as well as the real ID and the cbt c system fed now being imposed in The United States, we can see that it is coming to us as well." "There was a few months warning. You had to go to the bank and get your biometrics taken, essentially a photo. If you didn't do it, they locked your account." "The banks at the behest of government imposed know your customer and similar policies simply just stopped people from being able to access the money they work for until they submitted to biometric surveillance." "Agenda twenty thirty." "That's goldbiblepulse.com. Honest money for uncertain times."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hailing on to our last segment, another extremely disturbing thing happened just this past week. Vietnam deactivated 86,000,000 bank accounts overnight. Individuals who failed to submit biometric data were immediately denied access to their money. Doctor Andrew Kaufman warns this is not speculation. This is applied state level biometric enforcement. He says, don't assume this is too extreme to happen here. With the rollout of Real ID and advanced surveillance technologies, including systems linked to Palantir contracts under the current administration, the same methodology is entirely feasible in The United States. Take a listen to his clip. Speaker 1: Why is Vietnam the testing ground for the new banking order? Well, recently, Vietnam imposed a requirement for a digital ID including a biometric scan of everyone in order to have a bank account. And what they did to enforce this is they closed 86,000,000 bank accounts and seized all of the assets in those accounts. So the owners of those accounts have no ability to do banking or access their funds because they chose not to sacrifice their privacy and submit to this biometric surveillance tracking mechanism. Well, this is not something that is gonna stay in Vietnam. This is a test because if we look at for example, what's going on with the European Central Bank and digital ID initiative in Europe as well as the real ID and the cbt c system fed now being imposed in The United States, we can see that it is coming to us as well. So what are you going to do about it? Speaker 0: I wanna take a moment to just read this top comment, top reply to that post from doctor Kaufman and just think about the logic of so many people. I don't know if this person's a real person or a bot. I'm not really sure. But just think about the logic of most people when these types of things come in. I live in Vietnam. There was a few months warning. You had to go to the bank and get your biometrics taken, essentially a photo. If you didn't do it, they locked your account. Okay. So we had a few months. So that's fine because they told us, guys. Like, they gave us a warning. What's the big deal? It was unwelcome and annoying, but not difficult. I imagine those who didn't do it in time simply got their accounts locked until they came in and got it done. That attitude right there is exactly what happened when the government here implemented REAL ID earlier this year. Yes. This is annoying, but it's no big deal. That attitude is the attitude of most people whenever governments announce a new initiative of any sort. Ugh. I have to go and do this now. It's inconvenient, but at least it'll be easier moving forward once I just get this done. How many people are complying with Real ID to travel domestically already in The US? The second paragraph of that comment, quote, I imagine those who didn't do it in time simply got their accounts locked until they came in and got it done, end quote. The banks at the behest of government imposed know your customer and similar policies simply just stopped people from being able to access the money they work for until they submitted to biometric surveillance. What's the big deal? So take a listen to the rest of this thread, though. It's quite interesting. The person goes on to say, this sort of thing makes me avoid depositing large amounts of money in Vietnamese banks. It's just self preservation. All banks under all governments are one the primary policy levers they have over people, and you should always be wary of banks no matter where you live. True. So someone then goes on to ask that person, how do you protect your money? Give me an idea because I'm against all this personal data collection. Criminals are exempt. It's law abiding people who will be persecuted. Listen to this very interesting response. Lots of ways. As an expat, my defenses are a working bank account in Vietnam where I don't keep too much money and a savings account in America. I've also got some crypto and some gold at my mother's house. The strongest defense, I'm sorry to say, is to rent. Owning your own house feels really good, but it's also a target. Property taxes, special assessments, lawsuits, that sort of thing. If you're rooted in one place, you're stuck. Anything can happen. New obnoxious neighbors, natural disasters, insane local government policies. If you rent, you can just walk away from these problems. This sounds like it was written by a World Economic Forum AI bot. I like Vietnam, and the government is a lot more mild and reasonable than you would think, but I also know that can change. And if it does, I'm ready to go. So you protect yourself by having a savings account overseas. Fine. What about when that government and the next and the next do the exact same thing? You just keep moving your money around is not the solution for more than one reason. Number one, eventually, will be no other places to do that because this is a worldwide agenda. And number two, are we just gonna accept that this is how it has to be until one night millions, if not billions, of people have had lost access to their money across the world? Then that person says, look, guys. I hate to say it, but the only solution is to give up on your dreams of ever owning anything. You'll just need to rent forever. Well, how do you pay your rent and pay your utility bills and do everything you need to do without submitting to biometric surveillance? You can't. So you better just go on with the slight inconvenience, dummies. What is this madness? This is the madness of agenda twenty thirty in full swing. And let me tell you, as someone who's been debanked for journalism in the past, it is an extremely uncomfortable experience that would shake most into immediate compliance. Your money disappears overnight. You're likely at the bank the next morning doing exactly what they tell you to do. It's, of course, not what I did, but many would. Make no mistake. A new digital banking system is being implemented worldwide before our very eyes while we're distracted with culture wars and government propaganda. The old system does not suit their agenda, and they want complete control over you and everything you do, say, or everywhere you go. Everything has been digitized. This has been pushed upon us, and this so called digital age has flaws and loopholes for hackers, bugs, and viruses. Therefore, reasonable people have many reasons to pay attention to the building blocks being set up around us and oppose them with everything in us. Don't be distracted. Digitizing everything is the main agenda, and it's happening as we speak. People need to push back on this, support local businesses, use cash, have tangible assets like gold and silver. We have to establish a functioning parallel system as soon as possible before this happens to us. In his revealing book, The Bible and Gold, author Alan Armstrong examines a troubling truth. Our modern monetary system directly contradicts biblical finance principles of honest weights and measures. Gold isn't just a metal, Armstrong writes. It's god's testimony in the ground that truth is weighty, value is real, and justice is measurable. Genesis Gold Group has built their entire approach to retirement protection on these same timeless principles. While central banks print trillions from nothing, gold remains what God declared it to be in Genesis. Good. Armstrong's exploration of gold and sound money couldn't be more timely. From the tabernacle to Solomon's temple to the streets of New Jerusalem, scripture consistently presents gold as god's standard of honest value. Genesis Gold Group's faith driven experts help you transform vulnerable retirement accounts into physical precious metals, not paper promises, but tangible wealth that preserves purchasing power against the very devaluation Armstrong diagnoses. Why trust your family's future to a system built on monetary deception when there's a biblical alternative? Visit goldbiblepulse.com today for your free copy of the bible and gold, and schedule a consultation to align your retirement strategy with God's principles of honest money. That's goldbiblepulse.com. Honest money for uncertain times.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: Get your FREE copy of The Bible and Gold at http://goldbiblepulse.com. In this faith-based book, Alin Armstrong explores biblical principles of fair trade, honesty, and sound money. “Unequal weights are an abomination to the Lord,” he writes, reminding us that since Eden, gold has been God’s standard for honest money—a safeguard no one can print away or corrupt. Discover these timeless principles for yourself—get your FREE copy now at http://goldbiblepulse.com. DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.

Gold Bible – Secured My Wealth genesisgold.securedmywealth.com
Gold Bible – Secured My Wealth genesisgold.securedmywealth.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Meanwhile in the UK, the government is racing to impose a dystopian digital ID—one that decides whether you can work, bank, or even go online. This goes far beyond immigration. It’s about control over every aspect of your life. Minister Liz Kendall admitted it outright: digital ID will determine who can access government services—and who can’t. No ID means no access. That isn’t convenience—it’s exclusion. Australia shows us what’s coming next. A rollout pitched as “voluntary” in 2024 has already become mandatory. By next year, Australians won’t even be able to perform a Google search without a digital ID. Now the UK is moving in lockstep, with reports confirming that digital IDs will soon be tied to jobs, housing, and immigration checks. Critics call it the oldest trick in the book: problem, reaction, solution. Open the borders, spark outrage, then use the chaos to push digital ID as the “fix” for the problems they just made. But the ones really being locked out aren’t the migrants—it’s you. This isn’t about stopping illegals. It’s the blueprint of a global control grid—and once the gates slam shut, they rarely open again. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v6zbql2-uk-to-launch-digital-id-86m-bank-accounts-shut-down-fdas-shock-admission-da.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many of us warned that COVID was the catalyst for Agenda twenty thirty, a UN driven plan to put the entire earth into a digital surveillance grid that would mean the introduction of digital currency, digital ID, a social credit system where your online activities are directly linked to your ability to access money. Australia introduced a voluntary digital ID in May 2024, and as of December, just over a year later, Australians will not even be able to do a Google search without verifying themselves online. Now in lockstep, The UK has announced they will also be pressing ahead with digital ID. Digital ID will give you access to government services. One option under consideration would give digital IDs to all people legally entitled to reside in Britain, whether citizens or those with legal immigration status, the Financial Times said.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Many of us warned that COVID was the catalyst for Agenda twenty thirty, a UN driven plan to put the entire earth into a digital surveillance grid that would mean the introduction of digital currency, digital ID, a social credit system where your online activities are directly linked to your ability to access money. Today, that is a reality. Australia introduced a voluntary digital ID in May 2024, and as of December, just over a year later, Australians will not even be able to do a Google search without verifying themselves online. Now in lockstep, The UK has announced they will also be pressing ahead with digital ID. Take a listen to the labor minister Liz Kendall essentially telling everyone what we already knew this was about. Digital ID will give you access to government services. In other words, if you don't have a Digital ID, you won't have access to those services. Take a listen. Speaker 1: We know the government is looking at digital ID cards at the moment. How would that help prevent the situation that we're in now? Well, Kirst Dahmer, our prime minister, has said we are looking at what other countries have done to bring in a sort of digital accreditation. I think there's real actually benefits right across here from obviously dealing with illegal working, but also actually imagine if your viewers imagine that they had one credential that would allow them to access all the different government services and our public services do. I'm sure many of your viewers often tear their hair out with all the different numbers and passwords of the different bits of government that they have to deal with. I do think there's could be a real benefit here for people who are here and working legally and accessing our public services if there was where there was one route in, as well as the benefits it could do have with, illegal migration. We're looking at that. I think it is an interesting idea that other countries have taken forward, and we want to learn from what they've done. Speaker 0: Another classic example of problem reaction solution. We'll explain what we mean by that in a moment, but here is an article from Reuters UK Starmah to press ahead with digital ID plans. It says that British prime minister Keir Starmah is moving forward with plans to introduce digital identification systems as part of efforts to overhaul the country's asylum and immigration system, which the problem that he created, with an announcement anticipated as early as his party's conference this month, the Financial Times reported on Friday. The finer details of this scheme were still being ironed out, and the timeline could change, the report added, citing two people briefed on the matter. Mind you, the timeline, everyone, just to be really, really clear, literally depends on data centers and their ability to process all of this data, which is why they're racing ahead with all of this. But I will continue with the article. It says that immigration and asylum remain at the heart of Britain's political debate with the government under pressure to curb record migrant arrivals in small boats while also addressing the strain of housing, tens of thousands of, asylum seekers. One option under consideration would give digital IDs to all people legally entitled to reside in Britain, whether citizens or those with legal immigration status, the Financial Times said. The digital ID could be used for employment verification and rental agreements, though the government may still narrow the scope or revisit the plan, the newspaper added. Government spokesperson said Britain was committed to expanding the use of the technology to make it easier for people to access services, pointing to existing systems such as eVisas and the NHS app. Every single country in the West has opened their borders to legal and illegal immigration, and now we have a problem. We also have a reaction to that problem, quite a visceral one from the people, one that we then get promised will be solved, and then the solution is presented. Don't worry, everyone. These illegals will be deterred from staying here because they won't be able to access all of these services without a digital ID, which you will need to get to prove you're not an illegal and which will eventually be required to access any services, and then the illegals will, what, run to another country that doesn't have digital ID? No. They will resort to more crime to survive, and, of course, the government goes really easy on that crime, and the cycle continues. Let's not forget the government funded NGOs that will scream about human rights abuses as soon as immigrants can't access services. Mind you, the very people they brought this digital ID in for don't have one, but you, the person who's paid your taxes all of your life and not invaded anyone else's country, now do. This isn't about illegal immigration anymore than it is convenience. It's a plan that has been steadily progressing for years, and there is absolutely no indication this globalist agenda has slowed down in the slightest despite our protest to it. They've just gotten better at propagandizing us into thinking it has. They tell us we are winning and solving problems. They give us rhetoric to make us think they are on our side. All the while, they fast track Real ID, which is part of the building blocks of the exact same thing in The United States. They sell it as voluntary and convenient until it's not. People, please listen to me. This is something we've been saying for too long now. Once you tie this in with the ability to use the Internet, like Australia's doing, which these days you can't do virtually anything without, and banking systems coupled with digital money, which will allow for immediate penalties or suspensions of accounts if the system doesn't like what you've said, done, or purchased, we'll talk about that in the next segment, you are staring down the barrel of complete imprisonment. This is the beast system. People need to oppose this with all of their being. Are you protected in a world where threats of EMPs, solar flares, five g, and all types of EMF are interfering with our very existence? Escape the grid with Escape Zone, bringing you the highest quality Faraday technology for ultimate preparedness. Choose when and where your devices are detectable. Faraday bags protect you from EMPs, car theft, card and device skimming, identity theft, tracking, Bluetooth, and GPS. Choose from premium mobile Faraday bags, cross body bags, laptop bags, and even women's handbags, or opt for the optimum protection with a ballistic backpack, combining cutting edge Faraday technology with a ballistic three a Kevlar for the ultimate protection and preparedness. Now you can also protect from EMF with their top notch EMF beanies and blankets, shielding you from some of the most harmful frequencies in our environment. Whatever your needs are, Escape Zone has you covered, and their range is perfect for personal use, family use, or even as a gift for someone you truly care about. Visit escapezone.com/pulse and protect you and your loved ones today. That's escapezone.com/pulse.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: Want protection from surveillance, hacking, and even electromagnetic threats? The elite Faraday bags at escapezone.com/pulse block GPS, Bluetooth, RFID skimming, and EMF—perfect for phones, laptops, wallets, and more. Their premium ballistic backpack even combines Faraday shielding with Kevlar armor, giving you the upper hand in an unpredictable world. Want to shield your body, too? Try their EMF-blocking beanies and blankets—because protection shouldn’t stop with your phone. Whether it’s for you, your family, or someone you love—don’t leave it to chance. Shop now at escapezone.com/pulse and protect what matters most. DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Are you protected in a world where threats of EMPs, solar flares, five g, and all types of EMF are interfering with our very existence? Escape the grid with Escape Zone, bringing you the highest quality Faraday technology for ultimate preparedness. Choose when and where your devices are detectable. Faraday bags protect you from EMPs, car theft, card and device skimming, identity theft, tracking, Bluetooth, and GPS. Choose from premium mobile Faraday bags, cross body bags, laptop bags, and even women's handbags, or opt for the optimum protection with a ballistic backpack, combining cutting edge Faraday technology with a ballistic three a Kevlar for the ultimate protection and preparedness. Now you can also protect from EMF with their top notch EMF beanies and blankets, shielding you from some of the most harmful frequencies in our environment. Whatever your needs are, Escape Zone has you covered, and their range is perfect for personal use, family use, or even as a gift for someone you truly care about. Visit escapezone.com/pulse and protect you and your loved ones today. That's escapezone.com/pulse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you protected in a world where threats of EMPs, solar flares, five g, and all types of EMF are interfering with our very existence? Escape the grid with Escape Zone, bringing you the highest quality Faraday technology for ultimate preparedness. Choose when and where your devices are detectable. Faraday bags protect you from EMPs, car theft, card and device skimming, identity theft, tracking, Bluetooth, and GPS. Choose from premium mobile Faraday bags, cross body bags, laptop bags, and even women's handbags, or opt for the optimum protection with a ballistic backpack, combining cutting edge Faraday technology with a ballistic three a Kevlar for the ultimate protection and preparedness. Now you can also protect from EMF with their top notch EMF beanies and blankets, shielding you from some of the most harmful frequencies in our environment. Whatever your needs are, Escape Zone has you covered, and their range is perfect for personal use, family use, or even as a gift for someone you truly care about. Visit escapezone.com/pulse and protect you and your loved ones today. That's escapezone.com/pulse.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Our final story tonight is deeply disturbing. The FDA just admitted it never tested Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines for DNA fragments, relying solely on the drugmakers’ word. At an official CDC meeting, pediatric cardiologist Kirk Milhoan demanded answers on why the shots remain on the market when independent labs found DNA contamination hundreds of times above legal limits. The FDA admitted it had done zero independent testing and offered no timeline for action. Independent studies led by @Kevin_McKernan and David Speicher revealed excess plasmid DNA—including SV40 sequences linked to cancer research—far beyond FDA and WHO thresholds. Regulators claim there’s “no evidence of harm,” yet a new study found vaccine DNA integrated into the genome of a 31-year-old woman with aggressive bladder cancer. Their admission exposes a chilling truth: regulators aren’t protecting you—they’re protecting Big Pharma. @zeee_media's explosive report uncovers what they don’t want you to see. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v6zbql2-uk-to-launch-digital-id-86m-bank-accounts-shut-down-fdas-shock-admission-da.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
FDA has not performed independent inspection of mRNA shots for DNA contamination, instead relying on Pfizer and Moderna's data. "The FDA acknowledged relying solely on manufacturer submitted data for compliance without independent postproduction verification" and "stated it is discussing the issue seriously, though no timeline for action was provided." Studies since 2023, including Kevin McKernan and David Spiker, "confirmed excess plasmid DNA fragments, including s v 40 sequences in vaccine vials from multiple countries" while the FDA "maintains no evidence of harm from over 13,000,000,000 global doses." "Despite independent studies detecting DNA contamination levels up to hundreds of times above the ten nanograms per dose regulatory limit." "No independent verification of manufacturers' claims. It's like having a fox guarding the henhouse." "alarm bells, genetic fingerprint of COVID vaccine found in 31 year old cancer patients' DNA." "We have identified the first instance, first direct molecular evidence of genomic integration of mRNA vaccine genetic material" with "20 base pair" "perfect match" "chromosome 19" "non safe harbor region." "This was accompanied by severe, severe genetic dysfunction" and "it should demand the immediate withdrawal of these mRNA products." "Has anyone inside the administration begun a formal investigation... moratorium on these injections?"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The FDA just gave us a shocking admission. They confirmed the FDA has not performed independent inspection of mRNA shots for DNA contamination, instead relying on Pfizer and Moderna's data. The ex summary of this bombshell is ACIP cardiologist questions FDA on excess DNA in Pfizer Moderna COVID vaccines, it says. At the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices meeting in Atlanta on September, pediatric cardiologist Kirk Millihan challenged FDA representatives on why Pfizer BioNTech and Moderna COVID nineteen vaccines remain available despite independent studies detecting DNA contamination levels up to hundreds of times above the ten nanograms per dose regulatory limit. The FDA acknowledged relying solely on manufacturer submitted data for compliance without independent postproduction verification and stated it is discussing the issue seriously, though no timeline for action was provided. Studies since 2023, including those by Kevin McKernan and David Spiker, confirmed excess plasmid DNA fragments, including s v 40 sequences in vaccine vials from multiple countries while the FDA maintains no evidence of harm from over 13,000,000,000 global doses. Here is that shocking exchange. Take a listen. Speaker 1: Okay. So as a cardiologist, I see the spike protein as cardiotoxic. I wanna know how long that a biologic has made a biologic how and how long it's going to last. Oh, it goes away quickly. Then we have the recent Yale study that showed femtomols of spike protein, basically, until they stop the assay. So my comment is is I am really confused about the pharmacologic rigor for this product before it was released. And now with evidence of contamination, why is this not pulled off like any other biologic or medicine that is found to have contamination? Speaker 2: So I I will say that so a lot some of the information is proprietary information, and, I will I will say, though, the information that we have been provided by Pfizer and Moderna and what was shared with me, it it what they provided to the FDA was within the regulatory limits. And I I will also acknowledge that, you know, this is something we take very seriously, and I I want to sin I I want to sincerely thank the independent researchers, many of whom I know who have brought this issue to the public's attention. And at the FDA, we take the public's safety and, you know, the the safety of these products incredibly seriously. And, I I I just want to give you all that message that this is not something that is being ignored. And I can only, you know, provide with you the information that I have been given about what the sponsors provided us regarding the the DNA levels in their products. And and so that I think that I'm gonna stop with that. Speaker 1: Are there any plans for postproduction about independent evaluation by the FDA? Speaker 2: So I'll say that that is something that's being discussed, and we we just we, again, we we want to communicate that we take this issue very seriously and and thank and thank everyone who has brought this to our attention. Speaker 0: So I think I'm in complete agreement with this individual. How ridiculous is it for the FDA to approve drugs and vaccines for mass use based solely on information provided by manufacturers about contaminants and safety profiles of such drugs? No independent verification of manufacturers' claims. It's like having a fox guarding the henhouse. Well, just last week, we reported to you about this story that was posted on the Children's Health Defense website, alarm bells, genetic fingerprint of COVID vaccine found in 31 year old cancer patients' DNA. The preprint study presented the first direct evidence that genetic material from mRNA COVID nineteen vaccines can integrate into the human genome, potentially triggering aggressive cancers according to the authors. The findings contradict assurances that the shots cannot alter DNA or carry harmful DNA fragments. Epidemiologist and one of the authors of that study, Nicholas Holcher, breaks it down here. Take a listen. Speaker 3: We have identified the first instance, first direct molecular evidence of genomic integration of mRNA vaccine genetic material. We looked at a stage four bladder cancer patient. And first of all, this patient was a 30 year old woman where bladder cancers are extremely rare, extremely rare. So she received three Moderna mRNA injections and within a year developed this stage four highly aggressive bladder cancer. So we decided to do some molecular profiling. We did identify within what's called circulating tumor DNA. We identified an integration event of the DNA plasmid material from the manufacturing process. The portion of the plasmid that integrated is called the ORF region of the spike ORF region, open reading frame region of this plasmid. That's the portion that encodes for the spike protein to to to churn out this mRNA during manufacturing. So this portion, a 20 what's called 20 base pair portion, 20 nucleotide sequence of this plasmid was perfectly matched in chromosome 19 in the circulating tumor DNA. Twenty twenty base pair perfect match, which is there's about a one in a trillion chance this this was just an anomaly, and it integrated in chromosome 19 in what's called a non safe harbor region. So sometimes it can integrate into what's called the AAVS one locus, which is apparently you won't have many consequences. It was not in that safe harbor locus. So it was in a very dangerous transcriptionally active area. This was accompanied by severe, severe genetic dysfunction. And when I say that, I mean we identified there was many, many genes that were severely dysregulated that have to do with DNA repair. So her her genes related to being able to repair damaged DNA were literally being turned off. And so everything was going haywire molecularly accompanied by this integration event, accompanied by a stage four cancer, a very rare cancer in this age group. So this is very, very damning, and it's very worrisome, and it should demand the immediate withdrawal of these mRNA products. Speaker 0: So we have an admission from the FDA that they relied solely on the manufacturers to assure them this wouldn't happen. And now we have people all over the world dying from aggressive cancers that we have absolutely no remedy for because governments are still pretending this isn't why it's happening. Thus far, we've seen lots of talk and no action, and people are still dying. No doubt some of the people that did this to humanity are being protected, but the dam is breaking. No. It has broken, and there is no coming back from what we have all uncovered. Accountability for this has to start from The USA because the FDA was what much of the world kept deferring to. Has anyone inside the administration begun a formal investigation into Pfizer and Moderna? Has anyone inside the administration done anything since that hearing to commence the process of issuing an immediate moratorium on these injections? Enough talk. Ban these biological weapons now. Put measures in place that ensure that this can never happen to people again and give us real science, not AI mRNA to cure cancer, real science to show us what can be done about what has become a mass extinction event. Enough is enough. Imagine being in your twenties, newly married, and given just sixty days to live by the Mayo Clinic after a grueling cancer diagnosis. That was Rick Hill's reality in 1975 until a letter led him to a Tijuana clinic. There, he embraced Laotryl b seventeen supplements, enzyme therapies, a raw organic diet, and detox protocols. Within just three weeks, Rick was off morphine, gaining strength, and today, in his seventies, he's been cancer free for fifty years. His story featured on The Daily Pulse proves the power of natural alternatives. Now thousands have followed suit. Richardson Nutritional Center's Laotryl b seventeen and enzyme therapies paired with organic produce kits and detox support from trusted retailers are transforming lives. Rick reports even people who are suffering from the shots are achieving the same results he did. To use the same protocol that saved Rick Hill's life and receive a free copy of his book, go to rncstore.com/pages/ricksbundle and use the discount code pulse for an additional 10% off your first order. That link again is rncstore.com/pages/ricksbundle, and remember to use discount code pulse for an additional 10% off your first order.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: What if the real answers to your health aren’t in your doctor’s office, but in your own hands? While your family doctor may only give you 10 rushed minutes, the FAB 4 docs will equip you with the knowledge you need to heal yourself naturally. https://www.myehialoha.org/ages-fall-conference-2025-make-yourself-healthy-again-myha/#a_aid=VFOX It’s all happening October 23–25 at this year’s Healing for the Ages Annual Conference. Don’t miss your chance to Make Yourself Healthy Again. Save 30% on your virtual ticket today with coupon code VFOX. DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.

Video Transcript AI Summary
January 1999 framing begins with the subtitle: "How Genetic Engineering Will Change Us When? In the Next Century." The discussion notes a claim: "Statin drugs will shut down the absorption of CoQ10." It continues with "And that's why what Doctor. Group was saying, we need to we're doing this because this conversation has to start now." The speaker then contrasts personal agency: "Because one way direction is giving up your power to somebody else to fix you. The other way is you taking your own power to fix yourself." The exchange centers on biotechnology's potential impact and a push to initiate the public conversation about personal empowerment versus external fixes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is January 1999. The statement in the subtitle is, How Genetic Engineering Will Change Us When? In the Next Century. Speaker 1: Statin drugs will shut down the absorption of CoQ10. Speaker 2: And that's why what Doctor. Group was saying, we need to we're doing this because this conversation has to start now. Speaker 0: Because one way direction is giving up your power to somebody else to fix you. The other way is you taking your own power to fix yourself.
A.G.E.S. '25 AFC | Make Yourself Healthy Again (MYHA) - My EHI Aloha Join our Annual Fall Conference and learn how to Make Yourself Healthy Again (MYHA). myehialoha.org

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks for tuning in. Follow us (@Zeee_Media and @VigilantFox) for stories that matter—stories the media doesn’t want you to see. We’ll be back with another show tomorrow. See you then. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v6zbql2-uk-to-launch-digital-id-86m-bank-accounts-shut-down-fdas-shock-admission-da.html

View Full Interactive Feed