TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @VoxExVeritas

VoxExVeritas
Posted - January 27, 2026 at 12:14 PM
Saved - January 27, 2026 at 8:27 PM

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Lol... https://t.co/wTKN188t8n

VoxExVeritas
Posted - January 22, 2026 at 1:06 PM
Saved - January 26, 2026 at 11:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I review a sequence alleging 9/11 conspiracies and Israeli infiltration of U.S. security, especially DHS/ICE, describing a tense U.S.–Israel dynamic. It cites “Origin Of Terror” and then expands into the antisemitic “The jewish Modus Operandi,” claiming a covert, exploitative Jewish agenda, white suppression narratives, victimhood, and geopolitical hypocrisy, ending with a claimed solved 9/11 false-flag theory.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

🔥9/11 - Names, Connections, Motives - Lesser known facts about 9/11 - Watch it - Repost it 🧵 https://t.co/SeCdUWHz2Y

Video Transcript AI Summary
In September 1991, shortly after the end of the Cold War, a cabal of elite bankers and intelligence operatives led by George H. W. Bush allegedly financed a $240,000,000,000 covert operations war chest through the purchase of ten-year securities due on 09/12/2001. Project HAMR is described as being used to finance a covert economic operation against the collapsing Soviet Union, whereby unknown Western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry with a focus on oil and gas, crashing the Russian economy, looting its central bank, and orchestrating what is called the great ruble scam, along with other clandestine state-supported operations intended to prevent Russia from contesting the US as a world superpower, while enriching the economic hitmen who supposedly devoured the collapsing Russian economy after the Soviet Union’s fall. Evidence is said to show that several federal and private investigations had already begun uncovering the HAMR fund before the nine-eleven attacks, including the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), which reportedly had been investigating crimes connected with the plundering of Russia. It is claimed that 39 of 40 ONI office personnel were killed on nine-eleven, including the entire chain of command. The Pentagon’s financial accounting offices in the wing targeted were also an obvious target, as were passengers on Flight 77 who allegedly held top secret clearances and were connected with Pentagon Black operations. Agents of the ONI were said to have been investigating financial transactions linked to securities managed by those securities dealers in the World Trade Center, which were also targeted. It is claimed that 31 percent of the fatalities in the Pentagon were from the Naval Command Center housing the ONI, and 41 percent of fatalities in the Twin Towers came from Cantor Fitzgerald and Eurobrokers, two major security brokers in the World Trade Center. Cantor Fitzgerald was the largest US security dealer; Flight 11 struck Martian McLennan’s secure computer room in the North Tower, just below Cantor Fitzgerald’s location. A massive explosion reportedly occurred just under the FBI offices in the North Tower on the 23rd Floor, with fires on the 22nd Floor and explosions at Garbin Inter Capital on the 25th Floor and in the basement of Tower 1. Flight 175 hit the South Tower at 09:03, directly below Eurobrokers’ floors. Building 6 was destroyed by an explosion before either tower fell, and this building housed the Eldorado Task Force, an interagency money laundering watchdog group. The narrative argues that a national emergency by the Federal Reserve and the SEC’s declaration of a national emergency on September 14 eased regulatory restrictions for clearing and settling security trades for fifteen days, enabling the $240,000,000,000 in covert government securities to be cleared upon maturity without standard ownership identification. The destruction of the towers and Building 6 is said to have created confusion to conceal illicit activities that morning. Richard Andrew Grove, a nine-eleven whistleblower, is described as a software salesman for Silverstream, which provided connectivity for Marsh and AIG, linking them through specialized accounting software. Grove allegedly found overbilling of Marsh by Silverstream by $7,000,000 for fictitious hardware and an exploitable flaw in the software. Grove’s testimony and recovered hard drives indicated suspicious money transfers during the attacks, allegedly performed electronically via Silverstream software, with hush money payments related to the Marsh overbilling to facilitate clearing the HAMR securities. Marsh’s CEO at the time was Jeffrey Greenberg, son of Maurice Greenberg of AIG. Greenberg had risen to CEO of Marsh after moving from AIG in 1995 and resigned after financial crimes accusations; Marsh was located directly adjacent to Cantor Fitzgerald in the North Tower, with Marsh’s executives and whistleblowers including Gary Lasco, Kathryn Lee, Ken Rice, Richard Brewhart, and John Oltzhoffer among those who died on 9/11 in the meeting room where evidence would have been presented. AIG is portrayed as more than an insurance company, with long ties to intelligence communities. AIG ran Kroll Associates, the World Trade Center’s security contractor, and Morris Greenberg (Maurice Greenberg’s son) is described as connected to intelligence circles, having been nominated for Director of Central Intelligence after authoring a CFR report advocating that FBI and DEA agents abroad should not act independently of ambassadors or the CIA. The narrative links this to continued covert activities, including drug money laundering, and mentions connections to Iran-Contra and narco-trafficking, asserting a motive for Afghanistan’s invasion due to drug profits. Dine Corp and Stewart Air Force Base are cited in relation to the 9/11 events, with claims about the aviation routes and hidden agendas. The discussion covers several figures and institutions: Richard Armitage as deputy secretary of state who allegedly granted visas to 15 of the 19 hijackers; Frank Carlucci as Carlyle Group chairman and DC on 9/11; the association of Stratosec with Bush relatives; Kroll Associates and John O’Neill’s role as head of World Trade Center security; and the assertion that Able Danger whistleblower Anthony Shaefe claims the government destroyed data identifying ringleaders Mohammed Atta as early as February 2000. It is argued that the White House’s handling of warnings, the 9/11 Commission’s composition and conclusions, and media control by a small number of corporations contributed to suppressing the perceived truth. Further, the text notes the involvement of Paul Bremer, l Paul Bremer, and connections to Marsh, AIG, and other elites, and it discusses the Pentagon’s missing funds, Dov Zakheim’s roles in defense contracting, and the presence of nanothermite residues as part of the World Trade Center demolition discussion. The narrative closes with a claim that the individuals and organizations cited are as suspicious as the hijackers, challenging mainstream accounts and suggesting that the evidence of a broader conspiracy has been suppressed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In September 1991, shortly after the end of the Cold War, a cabal of elite bankers and intelligence spooks led by George H. W. Bush financed a $240,000,000,000 covert operations war chest through the purchase of ten year securities that, as it happened, were scheduled to come due on 09/12/2001. Project HAMR was undoubtedly used for a wide variety of illicit intelligence operations, but mainly it was used to finance a covert economic operation against the collapsing Soviet Union, whereby unknown Western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry with a focus on oil and gas, crashing the Russian economy, looting its central bank, orchestrating what became known as the great ruble scam, and a wide variety of other clandestine state assisted operations designed to thoroughly prevent Russia from ever contesting The US as a world superpower. While in the process lining the pockets of these economic hitmen who swooped in to devour the collapsing Russian economy after the fall of the Soviet Union. A spectacular investment for all, at least until money laundering began tracing all the money, or when the ten year deadline came up and the securities became due and began the routine process of authenticity and ownership checks. Evidence shows that several federal and private investigations had already stumbled upon the HAMR fund and were compiling evidence on it up until the nineeleven attacks. These included the Office of Naval Intelligence, or ONI, which was moved to the outer E ring of the recently renovated section of the Pentagon that was targeted and destroyed on nine eleven. According to E. P. Heidner, the ONI had been investigating crimes associated with the plundering of Russia. 39 out of the 40 people who worked in those offices were killed on nine eleven, including the entire chain of command. The Pentagon's financial accounting offices in that same wing were also an obvious target, as were the passengers on board Flight 77, many of whom coincidentally held top secret clearances and were connected with Pentagon Black operations. Agents of the Office of Naval Intelligence had also been investigating financial transactions which were linked to securities being managed by those securities dealers in the World Trade Center that were also targeted. Thirty one percent of the one hundred and twenty five fatalities in the Pentagon were from the Naval Command Center that housed the Office of Naval Intelligence. Forty one percent of the fatalities in the Twin Towers came from two companies that managed US government securities: Cantor Fitzgerald and Eurobrokers. There were three major security brokers in the World Trade Center, Cantor Fitzgerald, Eurobrokers, and Garben Intercapital. At 08:46 on the morning of September 11, Flight 11 flew directly into Martian McLennan's secure computer room in the North Tower, right below the floor on which Cantor Fitzgerald was situated. Cantor Fitzgerald was the largest security dealer in The US. Shortly after that, a massive explosion went off just under the FBI offices in the North Tower on the 23rd Floor. Fires were reported on the 22nd Floor at 08:47. There were also explosions and subsequent fires reported at Garbin Inter Capital on the 25th Floor and in the basement of Tower 1 as well. Shortly thereafter at 09:03, Flight 175 hit the South Tower right below the floors on which Eurobrokers was situated. In all three cases, the explosive, fiery destruction consumed the offices in the several floors above, destroying files and trapping victims inside. In the midst of all this, Building 6 was destroyed by an explosion that took place before either tower fell. This secondary explosion took out a portion of the building which just happened to include the Eldorado Task Force's offices. The Eldorado Task Force was an interagency money laundering watchdog group responsible for coordinating all major money laundering investigations in The US. In the immediate aftermath of September 11, these groups would be redirected to investigate terrorist financing. Building 6 was located directly between the North Tower and World Trade Center Building 7. While large portions of World Trade Center 6 were gutted by explosions and later by falling debris from the North Tower, the building itself did not suffer a global symmetric collapse at near freefall acceleration as did Buildings 12, And 7. FEMA photographer and nineeleven whistleblower Kurt Sunfield took some interesting pictures of the US Customs Vault in the basement of World Trade Center 6, which was found completely empty and left with the door wide open. All of its contents appear to have been looted during the attacks. There is also evidence that gold was being looted from the vaults beneath World Trade Center 4. There were several early reports of a 10 wheel truck packed with stolen bullion caught fleeing World Trade Center 5 when the vehicle had become stuck on a collapsed ceiling brace, forcing the driver to flee the scene. Many researchers have stumbled across one or two of these anomalies from time to time, the empty vaults, the secondary explosions, the fireproofing upgrades on the exact floors coinciding with failure and impact in the towers, the suspicious power downs and evacuation drills, the World Trade Center tenants and security firms like AIG, Marsh and McLennan, and Kroll, and their close ties with the intelligence community, etcetera, etcetera, these anomalies are not unrelated, but nevertheless became lost inside the chaos of that September morn, the aftermath, and subsequent cover ups. Okay. So what does all this mean? Overall, a critical mass of brokers from the major government security brokerages and the Twin Towers had to be eliminated to create chaos in the government securities market. A situation needed to be created wherein $240,000,000,000 of covert securities could be electronically cleared without anyone asking questions, which happened when the Federal Reserve declared an emergency and invoked its emergency powers that very afternoon. On September 14, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared a national emergency and for the first time in US history invoked its emergency powers under the Securities Exchange Act section 12 k and eased regulatory restrictions for clearing and settling security trades for the next fifteen days. These changes would have allowed the estimated $240,000,000,000 in covert government securities to be cleared upon maturity without the standard regulatory controls around identification of ownership. The towers needed to be demolished to create a big enough mess that the illicit activities taking place behind the scenes that morning could be hidden in the confusion of that day. Okay, now let's talk a little bit about who did it and how. Nine eleven whistleblower Richard Andrew Grove was a software salesperson for a company called Silverstream. Silverstream's technology was on the cutting edge of Internet solutions, offering software to web enable the critical business functions of Fortune 500 companies, basically integrating and making available on the web the disparate legacy applications and mainframes while simultaneously streamlining workflow and traditional paper processes, with an end result being lower cost of operation and more efficient transactions. Silverstream had built internet transactional and trading platforms for Merrill Lynch, Deutsche Bank, Bankers Trust, Alex Brown, and Morgan Stanley to name a few. Leading up to nineeleven, Silverstream was designing specialized accounting software for a major client, Marsh and McLennan. Marsh is the world's largest insurance brokerage and was located right below Cantor Fitzgerald in the North Tower. Approximately two ninety five Marsh employees were murdered that morning along with other innocent victims and employees who either knew too much or too little about their chosen work environment. But most importantly, Silverstream provided a specific type of connectivity that was used to link AIG and Marsh and McLennan, the first two commercial companies on the planet to employ this type of transaction. What then were Marsh and AIG doing, and why did they need to leverage technologies that no other commercial entity on the face of the earth needed to use to conduct business? The recovered hard drives from the World Trade Center combined with Richard Grove's testimony, give us some intriguing clues. Grove discovered that Silverstream was overbilling March to the tune of $7,000,000 extra for fictitious and unneeded hardware. He also became aware of an exploitable flaw in the accounting software that had been sold to a variety of Marsh's clients and partners. When he brought this up to his superiors at Silverstream and others at Marsh, he was told to keep quiet and not to worry about it. But other friends of his at Marsh were also getting concerned and began documenting what was going on and raising concerns within the company. At last, they were finally granted a hearing with one of Marsh's high ranking executives and were told to bring all their evidence to a hearing scheduled for 08:30AM on 09/11/2001, on the 93rd Floor. The high ranking member of Marsh who Grove did not name would participate teleconference from the safety of his home, while Marsh employees and potential whistleblowers Gary Lasco, Kathryn Lee, Ken Rice, Richard Brewhart, and John Oltzhoffer would die in the meeting room in the North Tower with all their evidence when American Airlines Flight 11 would impact that very section of the building. Richard Grove, fortunately, got stuck in traffic that morning and didn't make it. Computer hard drives recovered from the World Trade Center show a spike in suspicious transfers that took place within the World Trade Center as the nineeleven attacks were unfolding. Richard Grove is convinced that these suspicious money transfers were performed electronically using Silverstream software and that the overbilling of Marsh was hush money for the operations. It would certainly have helped clear up that $240,000,000,000 in securities and make it look like any of those companies might have done it. The recovered hard drives and financial transactions from nineeleven all show clear evidence that something was going on that morning. Marsh's CEO at the time was Jeffrey Greenberg, the son of Maurice Greenberg with AIG. Most insurance companies were hurting badly in late two thousand and one after $40,000,000,000 in insurance settlements had been paid out for the devastation caused by the nineeleven attacks. Yet one insurance company did not suffer quite the same losses as the other companies did. American International Group or AIG, as it turns out, is much more than an insurance company. With its long ties to the intelligence community, AIG was founded by OSS operative Cornelius V. Starr the uncle of Clinton's friend Kenneth Starr. AIG currently operates a complex network of shell companies and other entities which operate internationally and have been used for clandestine intelligence gathering and other covert activities for decades. The company that ran security in the World Trade Center, Kroll Associates, was owned by AIG. The CEO of AIG on nineeleven was a guy named Morris Greenberg, who was actually nominated for the position of director of central intelligence after he authored a report for the Council on Foreign Relations, of which he is a high ranking member, where he advocated that FBI and drug enforcement agency agents operating abroad should not be allowed to act independently of either the ambassador or the CIA lest pursuit of evidence or individuals prosecution cause major foreign policy problems or complicate ongoing intelligence and diplomatic activities. Of course, this type of policy is essentially a continuation of things like executive order one two three three three and the CIA assisted contra cocaine trafficking that went on as an immediate result. These backdoor agreements opened the floodgates for government drug money laundering and narco trafficking. Former LAPD narcotics detective turned whistleblower Michael Brupert has written a series of excellent articles documenting AIG's involvement in drug money laundering, undoubtedly revealing yet another motive for the invasion of Afghanistan, a country which currently produces over 90% of the world's heroin supply. Drugs are arguably the most profitable commodity on the entire international market, and drug money was undoubtedly a motive behind the invasion of Afghanistan and consequently the nineeleven attacks. While companies like AIG laundered the drug money for big banks, the actual drug production and trafficking can be traced back to the same Iran Contra affiliates like Richard Armitage and Frank Carlucci. Unfortunately, that rabbit hole is a bit too deep and off topic to get into here. I will mention that Dine Corp was heavily involved as well as Stewart Air Force Base in Upstate New York where the two flights out of Boston crossed paths simultaneously and shut off their transponders before making their way to the Twin Towers. Many researchers believe that the MENA operation was moved to Stuart Air Force Base after Barry Seal got whacked. Richard Armitage was the deputy secretary of state on nineeleven, and according to whistleblower Michael Springman, he was the man responsible for granting visas to 15 out of 19 of the nine eleven hijackers, allowing them to enter The US and pursue flight training. Frank Carlucci is the chairman of the Carlyle Group and was DC on 09/11, having just met with George h w Bush and the brother of Osama bin Laden on Carlyle Group business. Frank Carlucci was also the chairman of BDM International, a company that served as a front for State Department black operations. Frank Carlucci's employees at BDM International left to take charge of Stratosec, the World Trade Center and airport security firm. Corporate operating officer Barry W McDaniel, an ex military expert in logistics and materials distribution, and CEO Wirt Dexter Walker the third, who is a distant Bush cousin from the Herbert Walker line with an extensive history of managing CIA front companies. Marvin Bush, the president's brother, was also a board member at Stratosec. Although Stratosec maintained contracts for security upgrades which were set to expire on 09/11/2001, they were not the company officially charged with World Trade Center security. This role was assigned to a risk management firm called Kroll Associates. Kroll's chairman Jerome Howard was a longtime personal friend of ex FBI counterterrorism expert John O'Neill and was responsible for O'Neill's appointment as head of security for the World Trade Center just a few days prior to the nineeleven attacks. O'Neill is the world's leading expert on Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda and was a potential nineeleven whistleblower with hard evidence of White House complicity in the protection and shielding of the nineeleven hijackers from all means of federal investigation. Al Qaeda hijacking suspects were flagged by the Able Danger terrorist tracking program, which was also shut down by the White House. Able Danger whistleblower Anthony Schaefer claims the US government destroyed over six terabytes of data related to Able Danger, which he also claims identified nine eleven ringleader Mohammed Ata as early as February 2000. Those atop the chain of command in the White House, military, and intelligence establishment deliberately ignored all the warning signs of an impending attack, a clever strategy of plausible deniability which also served to portray those in charge as incompetent rather than complicit. In every major head throughout the chain of command on nineeleven from NORED to the military, we see a repeated theme of complicity through negligence or incompetence. After nineeleven, failure and incompetence was rewarded and whistleblowers were silenced. Combined with the fact that six corporations control 90% of the media and CIA operations like Mockingbird admit to taking over and subverting our US media. We can understand how such a big lie could have been kept from the American public for so long. But if you stop and take the time to do your research, you'll find all the evidences there hidden beneath a mountain of disinfo and lies. It's been ten years since nine eleven happened, and we are left with hundreds, if not thousands, of unanswered questions about the nine eleven attacks. A transparently fraudulent nine eleven commission report, which purposely failed to even mention the collapse of World Trade Center 7, and a host of ridiculous so called debunking websites, forums, and other literature which have done absolutely nothing over the past ten years to debunk anything other than cleverly selected straw man arguments and have failed to stem the constant flow of new nine eleven information which researchers have been uncovering and bringing out to the public. Instead, they continue to label truth seekers, including family members of people who died on nine eleven as conspiracy theorists and devise clever propaganda designed to prevent the general public from looking any further into the evidence or the actual claims of the so called conspiracy theorists. In this video, we will take a deeper look into the so called investigations which have provided us with the official story and why they deserve a more thorough examination. The Bush administration stalled government investigations into nine eleven for over four hundred days. A week after nine eleven, letters containing anthrax spores were mailed to several news media offices and two senators who were perhaps a bit too vocal about opening an official investigation into nine eleven. The anthrax used in the attacks was identified as an Ames strain, which means it had to have come from the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Maryland. A member of that institute, Jerome Hauer, managed the National Institute of Health response to the anthrax attacks. Coincidentally, Howard also warned the White House to start taking Cipro, an antibiotic which is effective against anthrax, a week before the attacks. Jerome Howard also happened to be a managing director at Kroll Associates, which ran security at the World Trade Center up until the weekend before 09:11 when that role was personally handed off by Howard to FBI agent John O'Neil, who would later die in the attacks, drawing strong suspicion that he was set up due to his knowledge of Al Qaeda and the nine eleven hijackers, whom he was blocked from investigating while he was working at the FBI. In January 2002, president Bush personally asked senate majority leader Tom Dashel to limit the congressional investigation into the events of September 11. The Bush administration only formed the nine eleven commission after being prodded by the victims' families who lobbied congress for over a year to open the investigations. When the Bush administration finally did open a nine eleven investigation, it was described by some members as set up to fail. Speaker 1: The president has said only a minority of the commission can see a minority of the documents, and then they have to clear what they're gonna say to the rest of the commission with the White House. If you're one of those four that gets to see these documents, would that change your opinion? No. They don't want any more eyeballs to see their documents than they could possibly get away with. It's a scam. It's absolutely disgusting. Speaker 0: They even attempted to appoint Henry Kissinger, a known cover up mastermind, as head commissioner. He resigned after victims' family members asked him sensitive questions about his connections to the Bin Laden family and the Carlyle group. Philip Zellacow wrote the conclusions for the report before the investigation ever began, and even then, any areas which did not support the official story were neither mentioned nor investigated by the nine eleven commission. Six out of 10 members of that commission have discussed on record how the government lied about the official story, and 70% of the questions posed by the victims' families were never answered or officially investigated. It's important to look at what happened to the evidence from nine eleven. The day of nine eleven, most of the FBI was in Monterrey, California on an agency retreat. Speaker 2: Let's go to our state depart department correspondent, Andrea Mitchell. Andrea, what can you tell us? Well, this from the FBI. The state department has been evacuated. There was a meeting going on in the Operations Center. Other top officials were in the Situation Room at the White House. Colin Powell is in Bogota, Columbia on a two day trip. But this very interesting information, Katie, Matt, and Tom, from the FBI, they had been operating a massive exercise from their hostage rescue unit. All of their top teams, about 50 personnel, helicopters, equipment were in Mon Erey, California for the last two days scheduled to fly back today commercially. So all of those people are out of place. It's fair to say according to sources that we've talked to here at NBC that the FBI rescue operations and other FBI operations are really in chaos right now because they can't reach their officials in New York. All of their phone lines are down. And now you've got all of their special experts on this stuck in Monterey, California trying to get a military flight back because there are no longer commercial flights. So they are seriously out of pocket. And there is a real breakdown of the FBI anti terror coordination team, which is, of course, the principal team that would lead any effort and was so effective under Jim Kostrom in New York City during the World Trade Center bomber bombing and the TWA explosion, which, of course, turned out not to be terror. Andrea, is the state Speaker 0: This was essential for keeping the more experienced and honest members of the agency as far away from the crime scene as possible. While other agency insiders could be assigned to the investigations before their counterparts returned. Federal authorities such as FEMA and the CIA took immediate control over the crime scene and began whisking away evidence that very same night. Turner Construction, one of the primary contractors at Ground 0, occupied the 38th Floor of the North Tower and was involved in performing the fireproofing upgrades inside the towers. It has been noted that these upgrades were completed in the three years before nine eleven on floors that match up almost identically to the floors of impact and failure on nine eleven. Once the cleanup was fully coordinated, the operations were consolidated under the control of two primary contractors, AMEC Construction Management and Bovis Lendlease. These are the two companies that were originally assigned to the areas of Ground 0 that included the North Tower, AMEC, and the South Tower, Bovis. A truly surprising fact is that at the time of the attacks on nine eleven, AMEC had just completed a 258,000,000 refurbishment of Wedge 1 of the Pentagon, which is exactly where American Airlines flight 77 impacted that building. Arguments over the size of the hole of the Pentagon and whether it was a plane or a missile are, in my opinion, a convenient distraction from the much bigger picture of why that section of the building was targeted and by whom. On 09/10/2001, secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld announced that $2,300,000,000,000 in unadjusted funds were missing from the Pentagon budget. The very next day, the offices whose responsibility it was for tracking that money down were destroyed when American Airlines flight 77 impacted that very section of the building. The only off-site backup for the Pentagon's black budget financial records was a secure federal office building in the World Trade Center Complex. Strangely, it too was destroyed on nine '11. World Trade Center 7 was the largest CIA headquarters outside of Langley, Virginia and housed offices involved in several large scale federal investigations into massive stock market and accounting fraud. Not surprisingly, World Trade Center 7 was the first to be cleaned up and the evidence destroyed at Ground 0. So if the Twin Towers and Building 7 were brought down in a controlled demolition and the scientific evidence points to nanothermite, then who could have produced this and who could have put it in the buildings, and how did they get it there? In the impact zone of the North Tower was a company called Marsh and McLennan, which at the time was the world's largest insurance brokerage company. One of Marsh's executives was a guy named l Paul Bremer, who was also the chairman of the Congressional National Commission on Terrorism from 1999 to 2000 and The US ambassador at large for counterterrorism from 1986 to 1989. Instead of going to work on the day of nine eleven and dying inside the towers with hundreds of his employees, Bremer decided to go on MSNBC and tell the world that Osama bin Laden was behind the attacks and possibly Iraq and Iran. And then he demanded Speaker 3: The most severe military response we can come up with. Speaker 0: Al Paul Bremer was called away from Marsh in 2003 to become the Iraq occupation governor, a role he has been widely criticized for. So Bremer not only worked inside the buildings but had offices directly in the impact zone of the South Tower where flight one seventy five would hit. He missed work on nine eleven to give us the official story on national television and went on to be the Iraq occupation governor. You really can't get more connected to nine eleven than that. Oh, wait. You can. Sorry. I forgot to mention that Bremer was also the former manager for Kissinger Associates. He was a member of the board for Axo Nobel, the parent of International Paint Company, which produced a fireproofing application for skyscrapers called Interchar. Bremer was also on the international advisory board for the Japanese mining and machinery company, Kumatsu, which at the time had been involved in a joint venture agreement with Dresser Industries, the oil services intelligence front where Prescott Bush senior and George h w Bush got their start with Neil Mallon. Anyway, the Komatsu Dresser mining division operated from 1988 to 1997. And in July 1996, it patented a nanothermite demolition device that could, quote, demolish a concrete structure at high efficiency while preventing a secondary problem due to noise, flying chips, and dust, and the like. As many of you know, residues of thermite, a highly energetic chemical mixture, have been confirmed in samples of World Trade Center dust, and the use of thermite at the World Trade Center was also revealed by environmental data. See the description for more links and sources. Scientific Applications International Corporation, a defense contractor with expertise in thermite related technologies, played a large part in the NIST World Trade Center investigation. A few other names and companies inside the Twin Towers also worthy of further investigation include Craig Stapleton, who is married to Bush's cousin, Dorothy Walker Bush. Stapleton was the president of Marsh Real Estate Advisors from 1982 to 2001. He was a member of the board of directors for Sendant that was charged with massive accounting fraud in 1998 and went on to join Winston Partners, a privately owned investment firm founded in 1993 and led by George w Bush's brother, Marvin. Other very powerful and well connected people worked in senior management at Marsh. These included Steven Friedman, a senior principal at Marsh Capital and and former partner at Goldman Sachs, who later became George w Bush's top economic adviser. Friedman was also a member of the Brookings Institution, the Bilderberg Group, the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, and the board at In Q Tel, the investment firm founded by the CIA in 1998. In Q Tel invests in state of the art technologies related to defense and intelligence work, including nano and chemical technologies according to its website. In another interesting coincidence, Friedman belonged through Cornell University to a secret society called Quill and Dagger, the membership of which includes Paul Wolfowitz, Sandy Berger, and Stephen Hadley. Wolfowitz, the neocon deputy secretary of defense in the Bush administration, was the author in 1992 of the Wolfowitz doctrine of preemptive warfare. He also made comments about a surprise like Pearl Harbor months before nine eleven and met with Pakistani ISI general Mahmoud Ahmed in the week before nine eleven. Berger, the national security adviser to president Clinton, was later caught stealing documents from the nine eleven commission investigation. Berger was also the boss of White House counterterrorism czar Richard Clark, and together with Hadley, who was Condoleezza Rice's deputy, was responsible for delaying or obstructing Clark's plans to stop Al Qaeda in January 2001. Jeffrey Greenberg resigned from Martian McLennan after being accused of serious financial crimes. The first plane of nine eleven flew directly into his company's secure computer room in the North Tower. Jeffrey Greenberg is a member of the Brookings Institution and the Trilateral Commission. Jeffrey Greenberg rose quickly through management at Marsh, having come there directly from AIG in 1995 and then becoming CEO just four years later. At Brookings, Greenberg hobnobbed with Lee Hamilton, cochair of the nine eleven commission. There's also Jim Pierce, another Bush cousin who was managing director of Aon Corporation who according to the NIST report modified unknown sections of Floor 83 in the South Tower in 1997. Jim Pierce had arranged a meeting on the 105th Floor of the South Tower for that morning. Pierce survived that day despite the fact that 12 people came to the meeting in the South Tower and 11 of them died. The location of the meeting had been changed the night before to the Millennium Hotel where Pierce watched the South Tower as it was hit by the aircraft. Apparently, the meeting attendees were not all notified of the change in location. Another interesting character is Joseph Kasputis of Baseline Financial Service, which occupied the impact zone of the South Tower on Floors 77 And 78 where United Airlines one seventy five impacted. Kasputes has a history of being well connected to the highest levels of government as well as to the defense and intelligence industries. Kasputes worked from 1972 to 1977 for the US Department of Commerce and Defense. He was also the deputy director of Nixon's White House task force that dealt with the Arab oil embargo of nineteen seventy three and was instrumental in the creation of the Department of Energy. Casputi's went on to run a large corporation called Primark that had offices in both towers on 911. One of the subsidiaries of Primark, the Analytical Sciences Corporation, TASC, worked with so called black or top secret programs. TASC also worked closely with the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Kasputi's was also a member of the Logistics Management Institute, LMI, whose members included Paul Kaminski of In Q Tel and General Dynamics, Charles DeBona of Halliburton, Skull and Bones member Joseph Samuel Nye, and Michael Daniels of Scientific Applications International Corporation. LMI's self proclaimed role is advancing the science of government. Casputi's connections to the DOE from 1977 through at least 1997 are interesting considering that the DOE was developing thermite ignition devices as early as 1983. Joseph Casputi's went on to become the CEO of Baseline Financial Services, which was directly in the impact zone on the 78th Floor of the South Tower. According to NIST, Kasputi's Baseline Financial modified the Southeast corner of Floor 78 in 1999, exactly where the aircraft hit on 911. Floor 77 And 78 were upgraded for fireproofing in June and April 1998 respectively. Another company of interest on Floor 91 just above the impact zone for South Tower was Washington Group International. This company was known primarily as a construction and mining firm, and it had just acquired Raytheon Engineers in July 2000. In 1996, Washington took over Morrison Knutson, an engineering and construction firm that had a history of working on large scale projects around the world, including in China, Iran, Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia. The army corps of engineers hired Morrison Knutson to demolish over 200 buildings in 1995. One of the DOE facilities for which Washington was responsible well before nine eleven was the Savannah River Site near Aiken, South Carolina. In February 1997, Lawrence Livermore National Labs and the Savannah River Site signed an agreement of cooperation to share technology. Savannah went on to add developing SolGel technology for fuels and other applications to its portfolio. SolGel technology is utilized by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories for making nanothermites. In another coincidence, Savannah River Technology staff participated in the search and rescue operations at Ground 0 by providing unique tools. Just before 09:11, Washington was going through a tough time financially and sought chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Securities and Exchange Commission documents show that Washington made court ordered pre petition payments as part of these proceedings to a number of companies, including Komatsu. Washington also made payments to Greenhorn and Omara, whose employee Teresa McAllister was a lead author of the FEMA and NIST reports on the World Trade Center disaster, and to Sumitomo Bank, which was closely allied with Komatsu. Building 7 was a 47 story federal office building in the World Trade Center site, which collapsed at 05:20PM on the afternoon of 09:11. This building was home to the CIA, in fact, the largest CIA headquarters outside of Langley, Virginia. It also housed offices for the Secret Service and the Securities and Exchange Commission. One of the most interesting tenants, however, was then mayor Giuliani's office of emergency management and its emergency command center on the 23rd Floor. This floor received $15,000,000 worth of renovations, including independent and secure air and water supplies and bullet and bomb resistant windows designed to withstand 200 mile per hour winds. Mayor Giuliani was a former US prosecutor for the South District Of New York from 1983 to 1989 who was in charge of investigating the terrorist financing Bank of Credit and Commerce International. After he left his job as a prosecutor to start a political career, he worked for a law firm called White and Case that actually represented BCCI. So he went from prosecuting the BCCI to working for a law firm which defended the BCCI. This was likely his foot in the door of this underground corporate criminal network. Giuliani would later help to destroy all the crime scene evidence from ground zero. Giuliani's sidekick on nine eleven was police commissioner Bernard Carrick, who appeared to be coaching some of Rudy's actions that day, keeping him away from the media and even answering questions for him about explosives in the buildings. In fact, Bernard Carrick gave us the first official government pronouncement that no explosives were involved in the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings. Carrick's department was also the same one that found that pristine, completely undamaged hijacker's passport, which survived a plane impact and fireball, which destroyed two titanium black boxes and three towers? Yeah. Carrick would later receive a nomination from president Bush to become director of homeland security, which he declined for personal and political reasons, and instead took a job training the Iraqi police force in Iraq alongside l Paul Bremer. Both men are credited for turning Iraq into the unwinnable quagmire it is today. In February 2010, Carrick was sentenced to four years in federal prison for conspiracy and fraud charges unrelated to the crimes of nine eleven, unfortunately, but it still goes to show you what kind of person he is. Definitely the kind of person you'd want inside the New York City police force during a staged event like nine eleven. And lastly, we have the Pentagon. It's certainly peculiar to say the least that Al Qaeda terrorists hell bent on destroying The USA would not crash their plane into the North Wing Of The Pentagon where all the most important officers were like Donald Rumsfeld, John Ashcroft, etcetera, and that they would instead choose to target the one section of the Pentagon that had most recently been refurbished to withstand missile impacts. It's also interesting to note that the company which completed the $258,000,000 refurbishment to Wedge One of the Pentagon was also hired as a contractor to clean up Ground 0 in New York City. Wedge 1 also coincidentally housed the Pentagon's budget analyst office where DOD staffers were working on the mystery of the $2,300,000,000,000 that was reported missing by defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld in a press conference the day before 09:11. The Pentagon's comptroller in charge of that money at the time was an interesting fellow named Dov Zakheim, a member of the council on foreign relations, the International Institute for Strategic Studies, and a contributor to the Neocon Think Tank Project for the New American Century. Zach I'm helped write the PNAC document rebuilding America's defenses in which he is credited for the line which states, further the process of transformation even if it brings revolutionary change is likely to be a long one absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor. Several members of the Bush administration, including president Bush himself, would later refer to nine eleven as a new Pearl Harbor. A respected and established voice in the intelligence community, his views were eagerly accepted. And Dov went from his position at Systems Planning Corporation to become the comptroller of the Pentagon in May 2001. Perhaps not so coincidentally, it was an SPC subsidiary, Tridata Corporation, that oversaw the investigation after the terrorist attacks in the World Trade Center in 1993. SPC, according to their official website, specializes in many areas of defense technology production and manufacture, including a system developed by their radar physics group called the flight termination system or FTS. This is a system used to destroy target drones, craft that would be fired on by test aircraft or weaponry in the event of malfunctions or misses. This highly sophisticated war game technology allows the control of several drones from a remote location on varying frequencies and has a range of several 100 miles. This technology can be used on many different types of aircraft, including large passenger jets. According to the SPC website, a recent customer at that time was Eglin Air Force Base located in Florida. Eglin is very near another air force base in Florida, MacDill Air Force Base, contracted to send at least 32 Boeing seven sixty seven aircraft as part of the Boeing Pentagon tanker lease agreement. As the events of 09/11/2001 occurred, little was mentioned about these strange coincidences and the proximity of Dov Zakheim and his group. Since there was little physical evidence remaining after the events, investigators were only left with photographic and anecdotal evidence. This is a photograph of the flight termination system module from their site. Note it has a cylindrical shape and is consistent with the size and shape of the object observed under the fuselage of flight one seventy five. The Boeing lease deal involved the replacement of the aging k c one thirty five tanker fleet with these smaller, more efficient Boeing seven sixty sevens, which were to be leased by Dobbs Akhaim's group. The planes were to be refitted with refueling equipment, including lines and nozzle assemblies. In this enlargement of flight one seventy five, we can clearly see a cylindrical object under the fuselage and a structure that appears to be attached to the right underside of the rear fuselage section. When seen in comparison, it is obvious that the plane approaching the Trade Center has both these structures, the FTS module, and the mid air refueling equipment as configured on the modified Boeing seven sixty seven tankers. Of particular interest is the long tube like anomalous structure under the rear fuselage area of one seventy five. This structure runs along the right rear bottom of the plane. The equipment attached to the underside of the plane which hit the World Trade Center is identical in every single way to the Boeing seven sixty sevens issued by Dov Zakheim. Speaker 3: Woah. Woah. Woah. Speaker 0: Bring it back. The video you're watching now came from this change first edition. Did you catch that? It appears to show the FTS pod self destructing just before impact. Also, notice that the flash is reflected in the fuselage of the plane. Flash is also present in footage taken by Evan Fairbanks, Jennifer Spell, The CNN. Al Qaeda certainly couldn't buy this equipment at Logan International Airport. And even if they did, the flight crew would have noticed it. So where did this plane come from? Another interesting piece of nine eleven evidence is the last twelve seconds of UA one seventy five. Since every amateur videographer in New York City had their cameras pointed up at the burning tower one, the second plane strike was filmed from nearly every conceivable conceivable angle. Angle. Expert analysis of this plane leads to some startling revelations. First, there is the expertly controlled flight characteristics of this plane. During its last twelve seconds of flight, UA one seventy five made a single corrective maneuver so perfectly timed and executed that it's unlikely it was piloted by human hands. Speaker 3: One of the things that jumped out at me when I looked at the the footage or the video of flight one seventy five as it went into the World Trade Center is it appeared to me that there was something on the under fuselage of that aircraft that did not belong there, at least not with a commercial airliner. Now I'll tell you where I have seen attachments that that look like that on military aircraft. So the question we have to answer now is was that the commercial airliner that hit the World Trade Center or possibly was it an aircraft that looked very similar but was a military type airplane. Speaker 4: All the recorded sources, all the different photographic evidence that was produced by CNN and and ABC, they all show this pod. It it's there. You can see it with your own eyes. And in my professional opinion, that that there was a pod attached to that the bottom of that aircraft, and, therefore, it was not United Airlines flight one seventy five. Speaker 0: If you take a careful look at the flight paths of American Airlines 11 and UA one seventy five, the two flights that took off from Boston's Logan Airport and crashed into the Twin Towers, you'll find a major clue. Not only did both these planes cross paths directly over Stewart Air Force Base, but they did so at the exact same time. Another odd synchronicity is flight 93, which had been sitting on the tarmac delayed at the airport for nearly forty minutes with no explanation. Originally scheduled to take off at 08:01AM, it was delayed until the moment that flight a a 11 crashed into the North Tower at 08:43AM. Another interesting piece of evidence that ties Stewart Air Force Base to the center of this nine eleven conspiracy is the white mystery plane spotted over Washington and the Pentagon. Through careful investigation, we've been able to map out the flight paths of these two ominous aircraft, which have been identified as e four b's, a type of aircraft that the military uses as mobile command posts. What concerns me is that both of these aircraft took off from and landed at Stewart Air Force Base. Another interesting coincidence I found was that flight 93 turned around directly over Hopkins Airport and flight 77 turned around directly over Tri State Airport. Webster Tarpley has done some of the most thorough research into the war game exercises that were taking place on the day of nine eleven. But this white mystery plane, the Doomsday plane, what was it doing over the Pentagon and the White House on 09/11? Who was flying in that plane? What were they doing? Being the comptroller for the Pentagon and the chief financial officer, you have to kinda wonder what Dov Zakheim was doing on 09/11 and what his connections were to the $2,300,000,000,000 that were missing from the Pentagon the day before 09:11. If anything, the individuals and organizations outlined in this video are at least as suspicious as the 19 hijackers themselves. They have nothing on us. I don't you. Book them, Dino.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

🧵 https://t.co/3ntc4NquhQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
- It was more likely executed by very sophisticated, highly intelligent international agents who meant the attack as a cover up for financial crimes being investigated by the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), whose offices in the Pentagon were destroyed on that same day. - The attacks were intended to cover up the clearing of $240,000,000,000 in securities covertly created in September 1991 to fund a covert economic war against the Soviet Union, during which unknown western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry with a focus on oil and gas. - The nine eleven attacks also served to derail multiple federal investigations of crimes associated with the 1991 covert operation. - Hundreds of billions of dollars of government securities had to be destroyed. - A critical mass of brokers from the major government security brokerages in the Twin Towers had to be eliminated to create chaos in the government securities market. - A situation needed to be created wherein $240,000,000,000 of covert securities could be electronically cleared without anyone asking questions, which actually happened when the Federal Reserve declared an emergency and invoked its emergency powers that very afternoon. - There were three major securities brokers in the World: Cantor Fitzgerald, Eurobrokers, and Garvin Intercapital. Cantor Fitzgerald was the largest securities dealer in the United States and arguably the primary target. - Forty one percent of the fatalities in the Twin Towers came from Cantor Fitzgerald and Eurobrokers. - Twenty four percent of the one hundred and twenty five fatalities in the Pentagon were from the naval command center that housed the Office of Naval Intelligence. - 29 of 30 Office of Naval Intelligence employees died. - The naval command center had been moved into the newly opened section of the Pentagon only months earlier. - In the vaults between the World Trade Center Towers, any certificates for bonds were destroyed. - On that fateful day, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared a national emergency for the first time in US history, invoking its emergency powers under Securities Exchange Act section 12 k, easing regulatory restrictions for clearing and settling security trades for the next fifteen days. - These changes would allow an estimated $240,000,000,000 in covert government securities to be cleared upon maturity without the standard regulatory controls around identification of ownership. - Emboldened by the lack of consequences for subverting the US constitution and breaking international law during the Iran Contra scandal of the nineteen eighties, a Bush administration group known as the Vulcans planned a bigger drive to crush communism once and for all. - They waged war against the Soviet Union in Iraq under George H. W. Bush and against Iraq and Afghanistan under George W. Bush. - Belonging to this group were Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Armitage, and Condoleezza Rice. - The Vulcan's drive to bring an end to the Cold War was fueled by a covert war chest invisible to congressional oversight. This war chest would be known by several names: Black Eagle Trust, the Marcos Gold, Yamashita's Gold, the Golden Lily Treasure, the Durham Trust, or Project Hammer. - The program also seems to have lined the pockets of the individuals that executed this policy. This was done to the tune of a staggering $240,000,000,000 in covert and allegedly illegal bonds, which appear to have been replaced with treasury notes backed by the US taxpayer in the aftermath of September 11. - The covert securities used to accomplish the national security objective of ending the Cold War ended up in the vaults of the brokers in the World Trade Center and were destroyed on 09/11/2001. They came due for settlement and clearing on September 12. The federal agency investigating these bonds, the Office of Naval Intelligence, was in the very section of the Pentagon that was destroyed on 09/11. - To this key group of senior national security officials called the Vulcans, who had participated in the victory of the economic cold war in 1991, the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, the four airliners, and their occupants would become collateral damage in the ending of the Cold War. Their debts were required to hide the existence of the Black Eagle Trust and the covert activities it funded for over fifty years. - The destruction of all these lives and buildings constituted a cover up of continued lawlessness by a fraternity or brotherhood of businessmen and criminals, often referred to as the enterprise in the nineteen eighties, though it has remained in the shadows ever since.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: While many people continue to believe that nine eleven was a terrorist attack perpetrated by 19 box cutter wielding hijackers, it was more likely executed by very sophisticated, highly intelligent international agents who meant the attack as a cover up for financial crimes being investigated by the Office of Naval Intelligence, or ONI, whose offices in the Pentagon were destroyed on that same day. The attacks were intended to cover up the clearing of $240,000,000,000 in securities covertly created in September 1991 to fund a covert economic war against the Soviet Union during which unknown western investors bought up much of the Soviet industry with a focus on oil and gas. The nine eleven attacks also served to derail multiple federal investigations of crimes associated with the 1991 covert operation. Hundreds of billions of dollars of government securities had to be destroyed. A critical mass of brokers from the major government security brokerages in the Twin Towers had to be eliminated to create chaos in the government securities market. A situation needed to be created wherein $240,000,000,000 of covert securities could be electronically cleared without anyone asking questions, which actually happened when the Federal Reserve declared an emergency and invoked its emergency powers that very afternoon. There were three major securities brokers in the World Cantor Fitzgerald, Eurobrokers, and Garvin Intercapital. Cantor Fitzgerald was the largest securities dealer in The United States and arguably the primary target. Forty one percent of the fatalities in the Twin Towers came from Cantor Fitzgerald and Eurobrokers. Twenty four percent of the one hundred and twenty five fatalities in the Pentagon were from the naval command center that housed the Office of Naval Intelligence. 29 of 30 Office of Naval Intelligence employees died. The naval command center had been moved into the newly opened section of the Pentagon only months earlier. And in the vaults between the World Trade Center Towers, any certificates for bonds were destroyed. On that fateful day, the Securities and Exchange Commission declared a national emergency for the first time in US history, invoking its emergency powers under Securities Exchange Act section 12 k, easing regulatory restrictions for clearing and settling security trades for the next fifteen days. These changes would allow an estimated $240,000,000,000 in covert government securities to be cleared upon maturity without the standard regulatory controls around identification of ownership. Emboldened by the lack of consequences for subverting The US constitution and breaking international law during the Iran Contra scandal of the nineteen eighties, a Bush administration group known as the Vulcans planned a bigger drive to crush communism once and for all. They waged war against The Soviet Union in Iraq under George h w Bush and against Iraq Afghanistan under George w Bush. Belonging to this group were Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Armitage, and Condoleezza Rice. The Vulcan's drive to bring an end to the Cold War was fueled by a covert war chest invisible to congressional oversight. This war chest would be known by several names, Black Eagle Trust, the Marcos Gold, Yamashita's Gold, the Golden Lily Treasure, the Durham Trust, or Project Hammer. The program also seems to have lined the pockets of the individuals that executed this policy. This was done to the tune of a staggering $240,000,000,000 in covert and allegedly illegal bonds, which appear to have been replaced with treasury notes backed by The US taxpayer in the aftermath of September 11. The covert securities used to accomplish the national security objective of ending the Cold War ended up in the vaults of the brokers in the World Trade Center and were destroyed on 09/11/2001. They came due for settlement and clearing on September 12. The federal agency investigating these bonds, the Office of Naval Intelligence, was in the very section of the Pentagon that was destroyed on 09/11. To this key group of senior national security officials called the Vulcans, who had participated in the victory of the economic cold war in 1991, the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, the four airliners, and their occupants would become collateral damage in the ending of the cold war. Their debts were required to hide the existence of the Black Eagle Trust and the covert activities it funded for over fifty years. The destruction of all these lives and buildings constituted a cover up of continued lawlessness by a fraternity or brotherhood of businessmen and criminals, often referred to as the enterprise in the nineteen eighties, though it has remained in the shadows ever since. If you guys want more information on this massive cover up, I've provided a couple links in the description below. If you want me to cover more of this in upcoming videos, let me know. Guys, thank you so much for watching my video. If you enjoyed it, give it a thumbs up and share it on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. If you wanna see more videos like this, click that big red subscribe button down there, and as soon as I upload a video, you'll be one of the first to see it. If you wanna support this channel, pick up one of these hard hitting conversation starting shirts. You'll find the link in the description below along with a plethora of other hard hitting high impact designs. Remember, guys, the price of freedom is eternal vigilance, and indifference to this notion is the means by which the people will secure their own oppression. Let's stop securing our own oppression, and let's start today. I'll see you guys in the next video.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/b0gXFgowhE

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Israeli Infiltration into U.S. Homeland Security Recent investigations have raised red flags about Israeli infiltration into United States governmental systems, particularly within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its sub-agency Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). While Israel is considered a close U.S. ally, evidence shows that Israeli intelligence and companies have actively penetrated U.S. security infrastructure – sometimes with American cooperation, other times through covert espionage [1][2]. This report examines the extent of Israeli infiltration and how it poses a national security threat. The findings reveal a “schizoid” relationship [3]: even as the U.S. and Israel cooperate closely, Israeli entities have repeatedly exploited that trust, leaving American officials sounding the alarm over our vulnerabilities and naivete in the face of such brazen activities.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/Y3vRYqTpx2

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Origin Of Terror | Thread in Progress

Video Transcript AI Summary
ABC's John Miller reports on a case that took the FBI and CIA more than two months to sort out while five Israelis waited in jail. The investigation began after a woman watching the Twin Towers burning from her New Jersey apartment saw three men on top of a van posing for pictures with the towers burning in the background. This report concerns a group of Middle Eastern men spotted on the morning of September 11, parked across the river from New York City, and has raised questions about whether Israel was conducting espionage on US soil. The investigation into their presence has persisted since the attacks, amid rumors and scrutiny in the days after September 11.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the days after the September attacks, there were countless rumors about strange coincidences surrounding the events. One report about a group of Middle Eastern men spotted the morning of September 11 parked just across the river from New York City has not gone away. Investigation of their presence has led to questions about whether Israel was conducting espionage on US soil. We're joined now by ABC's John Miller with an exclusive report this evening. Speaker 1: That's right, Elizabeth. This is a case that took the FBI and the CIA more than two months to sort out while five Israelis waited in jail. It began when this woman was watching the Twin Towers burning from her apartment in New Jersey. She noticed three men on top of a van posing for pictures with the towers burning in the background.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The Origin of Terror 🧵(DEEP THREAD) MAIN How the "Deep State" (US & Israel) Created Terrorism The US and Israel have created, funded, and armed the majority of terrorist organizations worldwide to momentarily combat their "enemies," justify more war, expand power, and/or

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/pZeMM4Zedi

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The jewish Modus Operandi:🧵 Orchestrated Diversity: Systematically import a "diverse" population into historically White nations through a sophisticated and well-funded political and organizational apparatus. Once the demographic shift is underway, they exploit the inevitable tensions that arise, such as the presence of arabs targeting jews. This is then weaponized to push for draconian policies that restrict freedoms for the entire population, despite the targeted group being only a tiny percentage. The narrative shifts from "diversity is our strength" to "diversity is a threat," but only when it serves their interests. Anti-White Propaganda: Relentlessly promote anti-White narratives through media, education, and cultural institutions. White identity is vilified as inherently oppressive, while every other identity is celebrated as virtuous and worthy of protection. Simultaneously, they cloak themselves in Whiteness when convenient, exploiting its privileges while undermining its foundations. This duality allows them to benefit from White societal structures while actively working to dismantle them. For example, they advocate for "equity" policies that disproportionately harm White populations while insulating themselves from the consequences by later abandoning the identification. Victimhood and Manipulation: When faced with resistance or criticism from White populations, they adopt a posture of victimhood, portraying themselves as persecuted despite their disproportionate influence in media, finance, and politics. This tactic is used to deflect accountability and silence dissent. For instance, any critique of their actions is labeled as "anti-Semitism," effectively shutting down debate and ensuring their agenda remains unchallenged. This strategy is so effective that even the slightest pushback is framed as an existential threat, further entrenching their control. Geopolitical Hypocrisy: While actively working to erode Western values and traditions, they paradoxically advocate for aggression against Eastern nations, framing them as the true threat to the West. This duality serves to distract from their own role in the destruction of Western civilization while advancing their global agenda. For example, they may push for sanctions or military action against countries like Iran, Russia or China, claiming these nations are undermining democracy, while simultaneously promoting policies that weaken Western sovereignty and cultural cohesion.

Video Transcript AI Summary
- They discuss the idea that there was an intention to "get more" immigration and to think more about third world immigration. The speaker notes a view that one constant of twentieth-century Jewish immigration and Jewish political movements has been to "lessen the power of Europeans in America," arguing that Europeans were seen as a threat in the long run. - The question is raised: "And why is that?" The response is that Jews wanted the United States to become "less Christian, less white European," because a homogeneous European society could "easily evolve towards Nazi." The logic is that if every ethnic group has only limited power, then a coalition among them could not form to become dangerous. - The discussion continues that Jews favored a multicultural society, which would "rationalize Judaism." The idea presented is that a multicultural society would prevent a large dominant white majority from forming a coalition that could threaten Jewish communities. - The speakers attribute the invention of a multiculturalist ideology to Jewish intellectuals, naming Horace Kallen as a key figure. Horace Kallen is described as a Zionist who did not like the melting pot idea, which had been advanced by an earlier generation of Jewish intellectuals. Kallen preferred the United States to be composed of ethnic groups that stay separate, as Jews "have always had," with the implication that this separation would make the United States safer for Jews by avoiding a large white majority. - The claim is made that Jews viewed American culture as negative and "too white," similar to Nazi Germany. The conversation notes that there was a survey conducted in the 1960s among Jews, asking whether it would be possible for something like the Holocaust to happen there, without needing to specify what "it" was. The idea is that respondents recognized that "it" referred to something horrible that happened to Jews. - The exchange ends with the observation that this awareness of potential catastrophe was connected to the broader discussion of immigration, multiculturalism, and the perceived need to prevent a dominant white majority from coalescing in a way that could threaten Jewish communities.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That they wanted to No. Speaker 1: They wanted to get more. They wanted to think more third world immigration. Again, my my view has been that one of the constants of Jew twentieth century Jewish immigration of Jewish election movements has been to lessen the power of Europeans in America. Speaker 0: And why is that? Speaker 1: And because they felt that that power represented a threat to them, especially in the long run. That They wanted to have The Speaker 0: United States become less Christian, less white European, why Speaker 1: is that? Because and then you can easily find Jewish activists who say that when they talk about immigration, but the idea is that if you have a homogeneous European society, can easily evolve towards Nazi. In other words, but if you have a society where each ethnic group has a sort of, you know, only a very very limited power then that could never happen. You can never have a coalition So Speaker 0: they wanted a multicultural society. Speaker 1: A multicultural society which also rationalized Judaism. Speaker 0: And in fact you said a multiculturalist ideology was in fact invented by Jewish intellectuals? Speaker 1: Yeah. Was it Horace Kallen? What? He's a philosopher. Who's that person? Horace Kallen, k a l l e n. He is very famous. He was a Zionist. He was very strongly identified Jews often. He didn't like this melting pot idea, which actually was advanced by an earlier generation of Jewish intellectuals. Kallen liked the idea that The United States would be would be, you know, composed of these groups, you know, of ethnic groups that would sort Speaker 0: of stay separate like like Jews have always had. So it makes The United States safer for people to be Jews if there's not a large dominant white majority. Speaker 1: Absolutely. Because, know, again, when Jews came to this country, they they saw American culture in negative terms. Speaker 0: Mhmm. And Much like Nazi Germany. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's too white. They they actually did a like a survey or something back in the sixties. They talked to the Jews, you know, what They asked them, would it be possible that that it could happen here? And you didn't have to say what it was. It is the Holocaust. In other words, something horrible happened to Jews. So that's Speaker 0: sort

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@Luv2Conspire 9-11 False Flag Conspiracy - Finally Solved (Names, Connections, Motives)

VoxExVeritas
Posted - January 13, 2026 at 4:31 AM
Saved - January 15, 2026 at 12:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim Israel/AIPAC buys influence in Congress and that a private foreign entity goes unregulated. I note Trump pardoning many Jews tied to fraud. I recount being offered $20 million to withdraw and run against Rashida Tlaib, saying the campaign-finance system is broken and benefits the rich. I reference Netanyahu’s corruption case and predict a pardon, list several handles, and end with the claim that 95% of top crime is Jewish.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Israel Caught Bribing Congressmen - 🧵 AIPAC: "We want everything focused on Iran". Why is it that a private foreign entity is allowed to bribe our politicians without regulation of any kind? Why is Trump pardoning so many jews that were caught for fraud? https://t.co/GUH67fXLuu

Video Transcript AI Summary
Our undercover reporter explored how funding for congressmen is secured. David Oaks, a prominent pro-Israel advocate, invited Tony to a fundraising event, then called him to discuss details. The group is described as a leading and wealthy donor network in DC; Oaks emails a list of the people the group supports and notes that “this is the biggest ad on the global group and the that’s the wealthiest in DC.” The fundraiser took place in a wealthy Washington suburb. “The feedback group, it makes a difference. It really, really does. It’s the best bang for your buck, and the networking is phenomenal. Congressmen and senators don't do anything unless you pressure them,” a participant says. Speaker 2 explains the current contribution limit: “From any person to a candidate is $2,700.” They outline how to increase influence by coordinating many donors: “if you really want to add punch to that type of buying of favors, you get 50 or 100 people together at an event like this, all chipping in $2,700 and then you bundle it all together and hand over the total amount to the lawmaker.” This can total “anywhere up to a quarter million dollars,” enabling a group with aligned demands to effectively buy access. The fundraiser was for Anthony Brown, who ran for Congress in November 2016. One speaker claims, “This is direct spending. Brown's gonna use that.” Another adds, “He's actually saying, we're buying this, these office holders. And that's the point. We're chipping in all this money so we can hand over 100,000 or 200,000 to the office holders so we can buy them.” Oaks recalls a similar New York event with Wall Street donors. A participant comments, “In New York, we're just Taliban. We don't ask a goddamn thing about the Palestinians. You know why? Because it's a tiny issue. That's why.” The process involves backroom meetings with congressmen, where donors’ goals are stated, and donors like Jeff and Calvin—worth about $250,000,000—are highlighted. One attendee describes handing the lawmaker an envelope with 20 credit cards, each usable for a thousand dollars. There is a disclosure law intended to reveal potential money laundering in events like this: funds earmarked must disclose who showed up and how much each contributed to the lawmaker. The group putting on the event has no name and is described as an ad hoc political group; it pools money for legal reasons. The group avoids earmarking law by not taking money into its own account and then handing it to the candidate; instead, it collects credit card information and turns it over directly to the candidate. Campaign finance reports would only show individual donors, with no record that they acted together as a bundling group or that they attended the event. What would be visible is that person A gave $2,700, person B gave $2,700, and so on. In New York, the arrangement is described as a $10 over two cycles minimum commitment; some donors give more. If one donor gives $5,000 and another contributes $100, totaling $5,100, they acknowledge that would be illegal due to laundering of campaign contributions; the limit applies to the individual, and laundering through others is not permitted.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our undercover reporter wanted to learn more about how funding is secured for congressmen. Speaker 1: Speaking of the devil. Speaker 0: David Oaks, a prominent pro Israel advocate, invited Tony to a fundraising event. Oaks later called him to discuss the details. Is Speaker 1: it just a social event? No. Hold on. I'm gonna email you a list of the people that this group supports. This is the biggest ad on the global group and the that's the wealthiest in DC, love. Mark Kirk, Speaker 0: The fundraiser was being held in a wealthy suburb of Washington. Speaker 1: The feedback group, it makes a difference. It really, really does. It's the best bang for your buck, and the networking is phenomenal. Congressmen and senators don't do anything unless you pressure them. Speaker 2: Right now, our current contribution limit from any person to a candidate is $2,700 Now that's a lot of money, you know, and that can certainly buy some gratitude with the lawmaker, but if you really want to add punch to that type of buying of favors, what you do is you get 50 or 100 people together at an event like this, all chipping in $2,700 and then you bundle it all together and hand over the total amount to the lawmaker. At that point, we're talking anywhere up to a quarter million dollars. So suddenly, you've got a group of people with the same demand they want from the lawmaker handing over a quarter million dollars. That buys a lawmaker. Speaker 0: The fundraiser was for Anthony Brown, who ran for congress in November 2016. Speaker 1: This is direct spending. Brown's gonna use that Speaker 2: He's actually saying, we're buying this, these office holders. And that's the point. We're chipping in all this money so we can hand over 100,000 or 200,000 to the office holders so we can buy them. Speaker 1: You're not supposed to advertise. It's only the advertising log. I was surprised they had an invite. I've never seen an actual invite before. Speaker 0: Oaks described a similar event he attended in New York, which included donors from Wall Street. Speaker 1: In New York, we're just Taliban. We don't ask a goddamn thing about the Palestinians. You know why? Because it's a tiny issue. That's why. It's a small and significant issue. The big issue is Iran. We want everything focused on Iran. What happens is Jeff meets the congressman in the backroom, tells them exactly what his goals are. And by the way, Jeff, Calvin is worth $250,000,000. Basically, they hand him an envelope with 20 credit cards and say, you could swipe each of these credit cards for a thousand dollars each. Speaker 2: There is a disclosure law that is designed to highlight whether there may be potential money laundering going on in events like this. And that is if the funds are earmarked, and that means the organization has to disclose who showed up at that event and how much each individual chipped in and what they handed over to the lawmaker. What's the name of Speaker 1: the group that puts this on? It doesn't have a name. There's no name. It's an ad hoc political group. For all the, like, legal reasons, people pool their money. Speaker 2: What this specific group is doing to try to avoid that disclosure requirement, it isn't taking money and then putting it in its own account and then handing it over to the office holder. It's just collecting credit card information and then turning that over directly to the candidate. Therefore, it's not violating the earmarking law, and they're not reporting this. All we would see on the campaign finance reports are the individuals who contributed, but there'd be no record on those campaign finance reports that they worked together as a bundling group, that they were all at this event. All we'd know is person A gave 2,700, person b gave 2,700, and we'd have no idea they're working in in tandem with each other. Speaker 1: The one in New York is $10 over two cycles. It's a minimum commitment. Some people give a lot more than that. Whatever your commitment is, so, like, if you give 5,000, you definitely ensure that we don't that I don't go over the 2,200. You know what I'm saying? Speaker 3: If one is at a meeting where person a wants to give 5,000, another person has only $100 to give, and that person gave 2 Speaker 0: and a half Speaker 3: thousand to the other person at that meeting as a gift, and they both therefore gave a total of 5,000, 5,100, would that be illegal? Speaker 2: That would be illegal. That would be laundering of campaign contributions. The limit applies to the individual. And so each individual is subject to that $2,700 limit. And if any individual goes over that limit, they are violating the contribution limit. They cannot legally do that by laundering money through other individuals. Speaker 1: If you give $5,000 you can be careful and sure that we Speaker 0: don't

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/y3mj9pLmJH

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/xRdV7yItF0

@NasserforMich - Nasser Beydoun

I was offered $20 million to withdraw from the senatorial race and to run against my friend @rashidatlaib. Even knowing where I stand on AIPAC's influence on our elections and foreign policy, the pro-Israel lobby had the nerve to suggest that I would even consider taking a dime from them. This goes to show how easily an election can be bought and paid for in this country. Our country's campaign finance system is broken, and the only people it benefits are the rich and powerful. I will not be bought. I will not back down. I will continue to run a grassroots campaign that puts America and its working class first. #aipac #Gaza #campaignfinancereform

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims they were offered $20,000,000 to withdraw from the senatorial race and run against Rashida Tlaib. They assert the pro Israel lobby will go to any length to remove anyone from U.S. Congress who opposes their agenda and their total unequivocal support for Israel, good, bad, or indifferent. The speaker emphasizes that money should not be the main catalyst for getting people elected, arguing that the pro Israel lobby uses money as its primary tool to threaten politicians. They state that the lobby will spend money against or for politicians to influence outcomes. The speaker urges Americans to elect people who truly represent their values and not those with special interests. They conclude by addressing APEC, saying, "APEC, keep your money in."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was offered $20,000,000 to withdraw from the senatorial race and run against my friend Rashida Tlaib. The pro Israel lobby will go to any link to remove anybody from the U. S. Congress that has any opposition to their agenda and their total unequivocal support for Israel, good, bad, or indifferent. We need to make sure that money is not the main catalyst to get people elected because the pro Israel lobby is only tool. And what they use to threaten politicians is the amount of money they're gonna spend against them or for them. America, let's come together and elect people who truly represent our values and not those with special interest. APEC, keep your money in.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/zsP1jKWwYT

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The Judge in Netanyahu Corruption Trial Case Killed To be expected. Trump will pardon him though. https://t.co/12E6INPMU1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senior Israeli judge Benny Sagi, president of the Beersheba District Court, was killed when a vehicle left a major highway and struck his motorcycle on Route 6 in southern Israel on Sunday. An investigation has been launched into the crash. Israeli Emergency Medical Service spokesperson Ma’am David Adam said medics and paramedics arrived to find Sagi with multiple injuries and no signs of life; his death was pronounced at the scene. Sagi, who had served as president of the Beersheba district court for the past 18 months after moving from Tel Aviv, was buried in a funeral held on Monday. President Isaac Herzog said he was shocked and pained by the loss, praising Sagi as a brilliant jurist known for his integrity and professionalism. The Supreme Court president, Isaac Ahmed, said the judiciary was dismayed by the tragedy, describing Sagi as a man with a huge heart who was deeply respected by colleagues. Sagi was presiding over Benjamin Netanyahu’s corruption case at the time of his death. In December, Netanyahu took the stand for the first time since requesting a pardon in his long-running corruption trial. Netanyahu was indicted in 2019 on charges of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust, all of which he has denied. The trial began in 2020 and involves three criminal cases. Netanyahu’s lawyers have requested a pardon from President Herzog, arguing that frequent court hearings impact his ability to govern and that a pardon will serve the national interest. They have maintained that the president has the authority to grant it on grounds of public interest.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A senior Israeli judge said to be involved in prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's corruption case was killed after a vehicle driving off a road came on a major highway and then plowed into his motorcycle. The judge Benny Sagi, the president of the Beersheba District Court, died at the scene following the collision on Route 6 in Southern Israel on Sunday. An investigation has now been launched into the circumstances of this crash. And according to the Israeli Emergency Medical Service, Ma'am David Adam, the medics and the paramedics who arrived at the site found saggy with multiple injuries and no signs of life. The paramedics have described the incident as shocking, and he was pronounced dead at the scene. Over the past year and a half, Sagi had served as president of the Beersheba district court, having it out from Tel Aviv district court. His funeral took place on Monday. The president Isaac Herzog has said that he was shocked and pained by the loss. Praising Saghi is a brilliant jurist known for his integrity and professionalism. The supreme court president Isaac Ahmed said the judiciary was dismayed by the tragedy, describing Saghi as a man with a huge heart who was deeply respected by colleagues. The Saghi was presiding over the Netanyahu corruption case. In December, Netanyahu took the stand for the first time since asking the president for a pardon in his long running corruption trial. Netanyahu was indicted in 2019 on charges of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust, all of which Netanyahu has denied. The trial began in 2020 and involves three criminal cases, and Netanyahu's lawyers have requested for a pardon from president Isaac Herzog, arguing that frequent court hearings impact his ability to govern and that a pardon will serve the national interest. They've also maintained that the president was has the authority to grant it on the grounds of public interest.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@Mofobian 💯

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@BluB40550 https://t.co/B8W44CIJt7

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@Real_MrGoode 💯

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@jilly_mullen https://t.co/ZkK7Flk5l9

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@khenry657 @Based1717 https://t.co/zlBvegtX8e

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@CherriRue Yeah....George Soros is jewish. The first thing you have to do to stop it is realize that at the top of all this crime and destruction it's 95% jews.

VoxExVeritas
Posted - January 12, 2026 at 10:46 AM
Saved - January 12, 2026 at 10:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I review a series of posts claiming Israel seeks to seize Patagonia through covert tourism/NGOs, citing Herzl’s idea of Argentina as a Jewish homeland and invoking “Plan Andinia.” They allege fires are intentional, tied to a land grab, with foreign ownership rising in Patagonia, aquifers, and corridors; Milei’s policy changes supposedly weaken protections. Survivors and others link fires to minerals and strategic assets, plus IDF land surveys and a plan to control Europe’s food via Mercosur.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

General Roberto Bendini warning about israeli intentions to “seize Patagonia” through covert operations disguised as tourism and NGO work. 🧵 Argentina 2003 https://t.co/82GAeMYKgx

Video Transcript AI Summary
A journalistic version that cited controversial statements attributed to the army chief again strained the government’s political climate, but official concern was short-lived until General Roberto Bendini himself denied to Defense Minister José Pampuro the expressions that a porteño business newspaper had attributed to him, in which he allegedly warned about intentions by Jewish groups to seize Patagonia. “Denied, that is, if he does not have much more to say, if this is not coming from his person, explanations probably have little to give. With denying it and knowing that these aren’t his expressions, that should be enough, right?” one speaker commented. According to the newspaper, Bendini had said that small Israeli groups, hidden in tourism companies and in some NGOs, were trying to take the continental reservoir of water and hydrocarbons that Patagonia holds. The article explained that the army chief made these remarks in a class at the War College and during tours of military units. The news caused concern in the Jewish community. One speaker noted that if General Bendini, in a telephone explanation, has totally denied those versions released today, it implies there may be other elements unknown to the public, and that from their side they would continue the conversation next week, since it has been denied that he accused any group of carrying out any operation. By the end of May, Bendini had been appointed to replace General Ricardo Brinzoni after a purge of more than 20 senior officers from the army’s leadership. Until then, Bendini, 53, was the commander of the 11th Mechanized Brigade in Río Gallegos and was a trusted figure of President Kirchner due to his long-standing relationship in southern Argentina. Beyond Bendini’s denials, Defense Minister José Pampuro announced that next Monday he would create a commission to investigate the episode. What basis did this version have? What interests moved if it proves false? What is the government’s position?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trabajado Una versión periodística que citó polémicas declaraciones del jefe del ejército volvió a enrarecer el clima político dentro del gobierno, pero la preocupación oficial duró poco, hasta que el propio general Roberto Bendini desmintió ante el ministro de defensa, José Pampuro, las expresiones que le atribuyó un diario económico porteño, en las que supuestamente advertía sobre intenciones de grupos judíos de apropiarse de la Patagonia. Speaker 1: Desmintió, es decir, si no tiene mucho más para decir, si este es un tema que no viene de su persona, explicaciones no debe tener muchas para dar. Con desmentirlo y y saber que no son sus expresiones basta, ¿no? Speaker 0: Según el diario, Bendini había dicho que pequeños grupos israelíes, ocultos en empresas turísticas y en algunas ONG, intentaban quedarse con la mayor reserva continental de agua potable y de hidrocarburos que hay en la Patagonia. La información explicó que el jefe del ejército sostuvo esto en una clase de la Escuela Superior de Guerra y en recorridas por unidades militares. La noticia causó preocupación en la comunidad judía. Speaker 2: Lo que sí tenemos en claro es que si el el general Bendini, en su declaración telefónica o explicación telefónica, este, me ha desmentido totalmente aquellas versiones que se han lanzado en el día de hoy, implica que habrá algunos otros elementos que desconocemos y que, de parte nuestra, continuaremos la conversación la semana próxima, porque ha sido desmentido de que haya acusado algún grupo de hacer algún tipo de de operación. Speaker 0: A fines de mayo pasado, asumió Bendini en reemplazo del general Ricardo Brinzoni, tras una purga de más de 20 altos oficiales de la cúpula del ejército. Hasta esos días, Roberto Bendini, de 53 años, era comandante de la décimoprimera brigada Mecanizada de Río Gallegos, un hombre de confianza del presidente Kirchner por su relación de años en el sur argentino. Pero más allá de las desmentidas de Bendini, el ministro de defensa, José Pampuro, anunció que el próximo lunes creará una comisión para investigar el episodio. ¿Qué asidero obtuvo esta versión? ¿Qué intereses se movieron en caso de que haya resultado falsa? ¿Qué opina el gobierno?

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The founder of zionism Theodor Herzl, talking about using Argentina as a homeland for the jews. - 1904

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/qSBAApbkIu

@paykells - ✨Payton Kelly🇺🇸✨

🚨 “Plan Andinia” in effect 🚨 Are the fires in Argentina part of an Israeli plot to establish a “second jewish state” in South America?? 🔥 https://t.co/HISCAw1wmD

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/romUpC9LvL

@DD_Geopolitics - DD Geopolitics

Argentina is burning and the numbers explain why. According to the **Land Observatory** (Observatorio de Tierras, run by UBA–CONICET), foreigners already own 13 million hectares of Argentine rural land, about 5% of the national territory, an area roughly the size of England. The national average hides the real danger: foreign ownership is heavily concentrated in strategic zones that matter for resources, security, and future control: - Patagonia and the Andean region (hit hardest by recurring wildfires) - River headwaters and aquifers - Border areas - Mineral-rich lands - Key logistics corridors along the Paraná River (e.g., Iguazú, Ituzaingó, and Campana now exceed 30% foreign ownership in some sectors) These are EXACTLY the areas facing devastating, recurrent fires. Policy makes it worse. The Ley de Manejo del Fuego** (Law 26.815, modified in 2020) previously prohibited land-use changes (e.g., for sale or development) on burned native forest or agricultural areas for 30–60 years. This provided a safeguard against speculative arson and exploitation. The Milei administration has moved to derogate or weaken these protections. In December 2025, Chief of Staff Manuel Adorni announced plans to repeal the 2020 restrictions as part of the "Consejo de Mayo" agenda, restoring the pre-2020 regime. This creates a dangerous cycle: - Forests burn (often amid chronic underfunding of the Servicio Nacional de Manejo del Fuego with real cuts of ~69% vs. 2023 and ~78% vs. 2025 projected for 2026) - Protections are lifted or bypassed - Land becomes eligible for quick sale or "productive" development - Strategic territory changes hands frequently to foreign buyers Acquisitions target high-geopolitical-value nodes like water sources, freshwater reserves, energy corridors, minerals, not just tourism or basic agriculture. As the article notes: "Foreign ownership is not just a matter of property titles; it is the loss of the ability to decide on the water we drink and the energy we produce." Top owners: - United States**: 2.7 million hectares (more than the entire province of Tucumán) - Followed by Italy and Spain The trend began in the 1990s with border protections dismantled and massive transfers, but the current speed is unprecedented. Map guide in first reply.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/G8QFMsDqFc

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

An Argentine wildfire survivor says he is no longer shocked by what is happening. He says it is 100 percent intentional, a deliberate land grab driven by the value of their minerals. He says the puppeteers are no longer hiding in the shadows. Everything is out in the open now, yet the people affected have no voice. The mainstream media will not speak out for them, and neither will the so-called “new media.”

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/Kgr9MZ80x7

@DD_Geopolitics - DD Geopolitics

🇦🇷🇨🇱 Why are IDF soldiers doing land surveys of Patagonia for the state of Israel? Chilean Senator, Eugenio Tuma Sedan, says Israelis are constantly gathering more information on the topography of the region and may even know more than the Chilean army!! With recent fires being attributed to Israeli tourists and Israelis being caught setting fires in the past.... it really makes you wonder....

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a known annual pattern of visits by contingents of the Israeli army, specifically reservists, who come to Patagonia, in both Argentina and Chile, supposedly to de-stress after their service in the Israeli army. Israel has stated that these are the vacations of its soldiers with “criptos” (cryptos), and that after three years of military service they are paid for vacations; but they have admitted or acknowledged that those vacations are paid in certain places around the world, not just anywhere. One of the places where they are most frequently said to come is Patagonia, in both Chile and Argentina. They are operating there every year. While it is true they do not come to live there, they are expanding their presence annually and carrying out reconnaissance of the territory, and perhaps they have greater knowledge of that territory than the Chileans themselves.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lo que sí conocemos con certeza es la visita año a año de contingentes israelíes, de reservistas del ejército israelí, que vienen a la Patagonia, tanto argentina como chilena, supuestamente, a desestresarse de su paso por el ejército de Israel. Speaker 1: Israel ha dicho que son las vacaciones de sus soldados con criptos, que después de 3 años de servicio militar se les paga vacaciones, pero han confesado o reconocido que esas vacaciones se las pagan en determinados lugares del mundo, no en cualquier lugar. 1 de esos lugares donde más vienen reconocido es la Patagonia chilena y argentina, en ambos. Speaker 2: Están incursionando todos los años. Si bien es cierto, no se vienen a vivir, pero sí están incursionando todos los años y haciendo labores de reconocimiento de territorio, y quizás tienen más conocimiento de ese territorio que los propios chilenos.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/sQ6ZwAlRsQ

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Surprise...Argentina was always part of the plan. Theodor Herzl - 1904 - Palestine or Argentina?

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/d8JoVuiss5

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

December 9: Milei announces foreigners can buy Argentinian land and develop it after fires. January 9: Patagonia is burning. Prosecutor confirms the fires are intentional. Accelerants and military grenades found on site. https://t.co/nnFY39EV6K

Video Transcript AI Summary
Regarding rural lands, the purchase by private foreign individuals is allowed. The prohibition on changing the productive activity of the countryside for 30, 60 years after a fire is also removed, a law of the
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: En cuanto a tierras rurales, se libera la compra por parte de privados extranjeros. También se elimina la prohibición de cambiar la actividad productiva del campo por 30, 60 años tras un incendio, una ley del

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/GrYWOqvY1M

@TheChronicler13 - The Chronicler

@VoxExVeritas Argentina Brazil chile Venezuela make up the mercosur agreement, to provide ALL food to Europe & UK. Jew controlled Europe & UK govts are forcing their farmers to reduce food production to zero by 2050. Jews will control all food to Europe from the agreement (Andinia plan) https://t.co/eb3KAclzNM

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that Europe should not outsource food security to South America, drawing a parallel to the dangers experienced with energy security. He contends that Ireland’s interests have too often been placed within Europe at the expense of Ireland itself and asserts that a strong agri-food sector is vital to the country. He calls for Ireland to stand up for its own interests first in Brussels. Speaker 1 responds by saying Ireland, though a small country, has a big impact. He describes a large turnout of supporters from across the country, with people driving tractors and lorries, stewarding, and volunteering to support independent Ireland’s cause. The message to the government is that Merkur, sir, it’s a no no in Ireland to Merkur. He notes that turnout was expected to be between ten and fifteen thousand, but the Gardaí confirmed up to 27,000 people had gathered, signaling substantial pressure on leaders. He suggests the country may face a general election and that the movement does not understand the pressure being imposed on people. Speaker 1 connects the current mobilization to past actions affecting fisheries before Christmas and argues that the same approach threatens beef farmers and the poultry sector. He asks whether the public is prepared to accept it, emphasizing the need for loyalty. He calls for all 14 Irish MEPs to negotiate in order to remove Italians from “the fence” and to prevent a particular deal from going forward, describing the deal as “dirty stinking rotten.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Food security. Europe should not be outsourcing our food security to South America at a time when we've seen the dangers of that with energy security. We have been incredibly naive in Ireland to put Europe's interests in Ireland ahead of Ireland's interests in Europe. And a good agri food sector is vital to this country, and it's time we stood up for what matters for Ireland first and foremost in Brussels. Speaker 1: Ireland have shown today. We may be a small country, but we pack a big punch. Speaker 0: What's brought you out and all of these people out here today? Speaker 1: This is an incredible moment today of people from all over the country, driving tractors, driving lorries, coming here stewarding, coming here and helping in any way to to support independent Ireland's cause to give a clear message to our government that Merkur, sir, it's a no no in Ireland to Merkur, Speaker 0: What what has the turnout been like today? Speaker 1: Well, you know, we were looking at towards, and we kinda got the feeling that they could be between ten and fifteen thousand. The guards have confirmed to us that they have they have up to 27,000 people have turned up here today. Now that's a clear message, We could be facing a general election here. They don't understand. They don't understand the pressure they're putting people under. We saw what they've done to fishing on the, before Christmas. The truth straight on the rebels. Now they wanna do the same with beef farmers and and and the poultry sector. Do you think we're gonna take it? So we need loyalty here that all 14 MEP's in Ireland will go out and negotiate to make sure we can take the Italians out the fence and and make sure that this dirty stinking rotten deal won't go away.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/xjVOceZLyL

VoxExVeritas
Posted - January 9, 2026 at 4:12 AM
Saved - January 10, 2026 at 10:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A responder cites Mackey’s 1869 work on freemasonry symbolism, focusing on the sacred four-letter name and its reverence in Jewish and Cabalistic tradition, plus related symbols like the Yod and the triangle. It mentions Hiram Abiff and the Arch as central motifs, and asserts freemasonry’s core as Jewish, Babylonian, and Egyptian. Several images and links are shared, including a note on anti-freemason/occult propaganda in Nazi Germany.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

What do you notice about this freemason symbolism in the Church? The symbolism of freemasonry : illustrating and explaining its science and philosophy, its legends, myths, and symbols - Publication date 1869🧵 by Mackey, Albert Gallatin, 1807-1881

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

" There was one person, however, who, it is said, was in possession of the proper sound of the letters and the true pronunciation of the word. This was the high priest, who, receiving it from his predecessor, preserved the recollection of the sound by pronouncing it three times, once a year, on the day of the atonement, when he entered the holy of holies of the tabernacle or the temple. If the traditions of Masonry on this subject are correct, the kings, after the establishment of the monarchy, must have participated in this privilege; for Solomon is said to have been in possession of the word, and to, have communicated it to his two colleagues at the building of the temple. This is the word which, from the number of its letters, was called the "tetragrammaton," or four-lettered name, and, from its sacred inviolability, the " ineffable" or unutterable name. The Cabalists and Talmudists have enveloped it in a host of mystical superstitions, most of which are as absurd as they are incredible, but all of them tending to show the great veneration that has always been paid to it. Thus they say that it is possessed of unlimited powers, and that he who pronounces it shakes heaven and earth, and in-spires the very angels with terror and astonishment. The Rabbins called it "shem hamphorash," that is to say, "the name that is declaratory," and they say that David found it engraved on a stone while digging into the earth. From the sacredness with which the name was venerated, it was seldom, if ever, written in full, and, consequently, a great many symbols, or hieroglyphics, were invented to express it. One of these was the letter, or Yod, equivalent nearly to the English I, or J, or Y, which was the initial of the word, and it was often in-scribed within an equilateral triangle, thus: the triangle itself being a symbol of Deity. " https://archive.org/details/symbolismoffreem00mack/mode/2up

The symbolism of freemasonry : illustrating and explaining its science and philosophy, its legends, myths, and symbols : Mackey, Albert Gallatin, 1807-1881 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive 2 p. l., 3-364 p. ; 19 cm archive.org

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Hiram (Yiddish for ""exalted brother") the Architect, in Freemasonry known as Hiram Abiff (Abi = father), flanked by the pillars. Stained glass window, St John's Church, Chester England. The core of Freemasonry is jewish, Babylonian and Egyptian. Mostly jewish. https://t.co/kn9kLehMw7

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Royal Arch Chapter Masonic Apron https://t.co/aFzmNBpxoC

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/qkJECpS1N1

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Masonry's Satanic Connection Christian Video Vault - YT📺

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents a documentary-style examination of Freemasonry, outlining its structure, history, beliefs, and claimed occult connections, with a critical perspective throughout. - Freemasonry’s framework and paths: - Freemasonry defines itself as a system of morality. The Blue Lodge comprises the first three degrees: Entered Apprentice, Fellow Craft, and Master Mason. Most Masons never go beyond the Blue Lodge. - For those who continue, two routes exist: the York Rite and the Scottish Rite. Most entrants go into the Scottish Rite, which has 32 degrees; the 32nd can lead to the Shriners, while the 33rd degree is largely honorary. - Historical origins and two kinds of Masons: - Author Ian Taylor is cited as having researched Freemasonry’s origins. - The program argues modern Masonry began in 1717 in England, spreading to North America. It claims about 5,000,000 Masons in North America, including roughly 1,000,000 in the Shriners. - A distinction is drawn between craft Masons (true masons who cut stone) and speculative masons (humanist thinkers who joined lodges to push a new world order). The implication is that humanists infiltrated craft lodges to form speculative Masonry. - Perceived secrecy, vows, and initiation: - Initiation into the Blue Lodge begins with the entered apprentice ceremony: the candidate is stripped of clothing, blindfolded, a noose placed around the neck, and brought to the lodge door before the Worshipful Master. - A blood oath is sworn with a threat of physical harm for revealing secrets, with the candidate placing a thumb on the throat and swearing not to reveal Masonic secrets under threat of death and dismemberment. - Progression through the Scottish Rite involves worship of various deities (Egyptian, Persian, Greek) through ritual, though many details are allegorical. - Paganism, symbolism, and alleged origins: - The program claims Freemasonry’s ritual and theology originate from Egyptian paganism, with Rosicrucianism influencing its early development. Osiris, Adonis, Isis are cited as frequent references. - Blood initiation rites, the usage of blood oaths, and the white lambskin apron are described as tied to pagan and fertility symbolism. The square, compass, and the letter G allegedly symbolize the generating principle of life, with the claim that the compass represents the female and the square the male, implicating sexual symbolism in the apron. - The obelisk is discussed as a resurrection symbol and as a common grave marker for prominent figures like Sir John A. Macdonald and George Washington, linking Freemasonry to Egyptian symbolism. - Key symbols and alleged doctrinal content: - The point within a circle is described as sun-worship-derived and phallic in origin, representing the universe’s productive powers. Albert Mackie, Albert Pike, and Morals and Dogma are cited to support occult origins. - Albert Pike is quoted saying Lucifer is god and Adonai is also God, portraying a supposed universal religion that honors all great reformers and de-emphasizes the exclusive truth of Christian salvation. - Manly P. Hall is cited: “The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands,” and that a true Mason worships universal truth rather than a single creed. Pike allegedly states that the blue degrees are the outer court or portico of the temple, and that initiates are deliberately misled about the full meanings of symbols. - Jesus, salvation, and Christian critique: - The program contrasts Christian salvation through Jesus Christ with Masonic teachings, which it claims rely on good works and a belief that one can earn salvation by merit in the celestial lodge. - It cites that the Masonic god is the “great architect of the universe,” a trinity that includes a composite of Jehovah, Baal, and Osiris, and the royal arch degree supposedly reveals the Lost Name of God, Jubilant, whispered only among three Masons. - Reactions and conclusions: - Several former Masons recount personal experiences of initiation and claims of deception, with some stating they left Masonry after recognizing its pagan and occult roots. - The piece acknowledges that many Masons perform good works and that the organization has contributed positively in some contexts, but argues that the core is pagan and occult, more aligned with witchcraft than with Christianity. - Final stance: - The video frames its account as objective yet critical, asserting that Freemasonry is a pagan religion more closely allied with witchcraft than with Christianity, with its true god being a three-headed amalgam of Jehovah, Baal, and Osiris, and its path to “salvation” through moral works rather than through Christ. It urges Christians who belong to the lodge to choose between remaining a Mason or following Christ, highlighting testimonies of individuals who resigned from Masonry after studying its content.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Throughout the civilized world, particularly the Western world, diversity abounds. We see this diversity in our socioeconomic, cultural, and ethnic differences. But hidden beneath the surface, away from the eyes of the casual observer and the merely curious, is another society altogether. A society of secrets to coin their own phrase. This is the largely invisible world of Freemasonry. I'm Mike Mandel. For the next little while, we'll be examining the beliefs, teachings, and practices of Freemasonry. We'll be speaking with former Masons and reviewing actual Masonic literature to try to gain an objective view of this hidden fraternal order. Our conclusions may prove to be quite startling. But in order to make this material coherent, it's essential to begin with an understanding of what Freemasonry is. Freemasonry defines itself as being a system of morality. The basis of Freemasonry, which all Masons go through, is the Blue Lodge. The Blue Lodge being the first three degrees or levels of Freemasonry. Entered apprentice, the first degree, fellow craft, the second degree, and master mason, the third degree. Most Masons never go beyond third degree. Although if one chooses to go beyond the Blue Lodge, there are two routes that can be taken. One is the York Rite and one is the Scottish Rite. Most Masons who decide to go past the Blue Lodge enter the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. The Scottish Rite has 32 degrees. The thirty second can lead one into the Shriners if one so chooses. The thirty third degree, which does exist, is largely honorary. Author Ian Taylor has extensively researched the origins of modern Freemasonry. Speaker 1: To many people, the very word Freemasonry evokes a sense of mystery, secret society, and so on. But in order to find out what they're all about, we need to know a little history. There were many humanist thinkers back in the fifteen hundreds who saw the corruption that there was in the church of the day. And they concluded that in order to get rid of that corruption, they would have to be a new world order. They had read Plato's Republic. Plato's Republic in the fifteen hundreds was now popular work. And Plato too was a Greek philosopher living in the fifth century BC, and he too was totally fed up with the corruption that there was in government. He said, if we could have a group of wise men who are well paid to rule over the people, then there would be no corruption. It's a nice thought, but a rather naive one. We've seen such governments today, and they are totally corrupt. But nevertheless, there are still people today, many people who think that it is a good idea. This then was the agenda for the humanist thinkers back in the fifteen hundreds. But in order to do that, they had to first destroy the existing world order. The existing world order based upon the rules of God through the king and through the church. But to even suggest this would have been seen to be heresy in its day, and they would have lost their heads quite literally. And so they had to go into a secret society. Now the Freemasons in that day, these were craftsmans. These were the men who actually built the cathedrals of the day. They were highly skilled men, and it was like an early trade union. And they wanted to keep the the secrets of their skills to themselves. Good reasons for that. And so the the humanist thinkers infiltrated into the Kraft Masonic lodges, and they then became the speculative masons. They were called speculative masons by the Kraft Masons because they wouldn't have known a square from a compass. They were just the the humanists, the the idealists, the academics. And so there are within the Masonic lodges today, two types of mason. The craft mason, who is the genuine mason and cut stone and so on. And then there is the speculative Mason, and he's the humanist thinker. He's the person who has, purpose is to rebuild a new world order. Speaker 0: Author and lecturer Ron Carlson has dedicated two years to researching the subject of Freemasonry. Speaker 2: Well, modern masonry actually began in the year 1717 in England. The lodge was formed and many of these things were developed after 1717 in England and then came to America and Canada as people migrated to North America during those years and is widely established here in North America. It's estimated close to 5,000,000 men are involved in Freemasonry here in North America, perhaps 1,000,000 in the Shriners. What is Masonry in the eyes of the Freemason? What does Speaker 0: the Mason view it to be? Speaker 2: Well, you find that most Masons go into Masonry, viewing it simply as a fraternal organization, kind of an advanced Boy Scouts because their father or grandfather was involved in Masonry. And they get into it naively, not realizing that it is a religious organization designed for very specific spiritual purposes. Speaker 0: Over the centuries, man has evolved a variety of religious beliefs and traditions. Some of these, such as Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, are monotheistic. That is, they're based on the concept of one supreme deity. Others, such as Hinduism, are polytheistic, believing in many gods and goddesses. But one of the oldest religions is also the most universal, emerging virtually unchanged in geographically separated and radically diverse cultures. This is the religion of paganism. The worship of the moon goddess and the sun god, whether they're called Isis and Osiris, Apollo and Diana, Cyrenos and Arabia, or a host of other names. Paganism is the same mystical religion that first emerged in ancient Babylon thousands of years ago. But what has paganism got to Speaker 1: do with Freemasonry? The ritual and theology of Freemasonry really originates from, Egyptian paganism. And the reason for this is that as we find, in 1717, the rituals and theology were formalized and brought together and formed the Grand Lodge in England. The reason being that there were a great many lodges throughout England and throughout Europe at that time. They all had slightly different practices. These practices had originated from the origins of the speculative Masons, of course was Rosicrucianism. The Rosicrucians believed in the Hermetic and Egyptian traditions, and as we'll find in within Freemasonry, we find Osiris, Adonis, and Isis mentioned quite frequently. So, of course, these are the Egyptian pagan symbols, pagan gods. One of the, rituals that was used in some of the lodges prior to 1717 and shortly after, in fact, was the, ritual of the blood initiation rite. This was where the, little finger was cut and blood was shed, and this was the new member doing that, making a blood covenant with the organization. Speaker 2: What happens is when a mason joins the lodge, he first enters into what is called the Blue Lodge. And the very first thing that every mason is required to do is to go through a initiation ceremony. It's called the entered apprentice degree. And in that initiation ceremony, he will be stripped of much of his clothing. A blindfold will be placed over his eyes. A noose will be placed around his neck, and he will be brought to the door of the Masonic Lodge. And there a person will greet him and usher him in, and there he will come before an altar. And every Mason stands before an altar, and there behind the altar is a man called the worshipful master of the lodge. Speaker 1: Today, we find that when the Speaker 2: new member joins the organization, he kneels, he's blindfolded, he's bare breasted, and the master of the lodge touches his left breast with a sharply pointed sword. And they are then required that with this blindfold over their eyes to take a blood oath, not to reveal the secrets of masonry or they will lose their life. Every Mason puts his thumb to his throat. And he swears a blood oath not to reveal the secrets of Masonry or to have his throat cut from ear to ear, his bowels ripped open and given to the beasts of the field. And these pagan blood oaths are taken to swear them to secrecy so they will not reveal the secrets of what they will learn as they progress through the Masonic Lodge. Now, most men will go into the Scottish Rite and progress on through 32 degrees. And in each one of those degrees, they give worship to different gods and deities, Egyptian gods, Persian gods, Greek gods, and they go through a series of rituals. Now, much of this is covered up by symbols and allegories so that Masons, as they go through it, don't fully understand what they're doing. Speaker 3: In the blue degrees and initiate is initiated into the Egyptian trinity of the ancient mysteries of Egypt. And this Egyptian trinity is hidden from the initiate. He does not know at all what he is being initiated into. It's not even mentioned. Speaker 2: But if they would read their authoritative books which explain the symbols and the allegories, it becomes very obvious what they're involved in. They're involved in pagan idolatrous worship, much of it based upon the Kabbalah, which is the ancient Jewish book of the occult. Speaker 3: It is based on Egyptian paganism and the worship of nature. It's really what it is. It based on the worship of the male Speaker 0: regenerative power, the female regenerative power, and the product. Any historian will readily agree that paganism is and was essentially a nature religion. Its rituals were intentionally designed around the phases of the moon, the seasons, and the vernal equinox, etcetera. Rituals were developed to encourage abundant crops, usually by seeking the blessing of the sun, the giver of warmth, and the counterbalance of the moon, the timepiece for planting and harvesting. From this duality of worship, the sun and moon, light and darkness, active and passive, male and female. Paganism developed fertility rights based upon the sex act and more specifically, the reproductive organs themselves. This is one of Speaker 2: the reasons why Masons, when they enter the lodge, are are, required to put on a white lambskin apron. Masons wear this white lambskin apron as a covering of what they ultimately believe is the Masonic, deity, what they call the generating principle of life. You know, they wear the square and compass and in the center is a G. You see it on the Masonic lodges where they have the square and compass with the G. Some Masons will tell you it means the geometry of the universe or it means God. Actually, their own books say it's a generating principle of life. The compass or the square represents the female. And the compass coming down upon her represents the male that impregnates the female. And this generating principle, the male organ, is what brings immortality in life. You see, when they talk about immortality, they are talking about recreating life through, the sexual act. And this is what they are covering with the white lambskin apron. This is why a woman can never be a Mason. She does not have the generating principle of life, which they proudly wear on their lapel as the square and compass in the g. Speaker 1: Freemasonry uses Egyptian pagan symbols quite often, and we can see that. And one that comes to mind is the obelisk. The obelisk is a, tall pillar in stone, tapered and square in section with a pyramidion on top, and that was used among the Egyptians as a resurrection symbol. The idea was it was actually a phallic symbol. It stood tall and erect, and it was used to procreate, and one was resurrected through one's offspring, and that was the argument. Well, the same thing applies today. And we find that where Freemasons are buried, for instance, very often, it'll be a obelisk that's used as a grave marker. Sir John a MacDonald, first prime minister of Canada, or George Washington, first president of The United States. Their grave markers both contain, obelisks. And sometimes even the obelisk will even contain the, compass and square to indicate quite clearly where they're coming from. Speaker 0: But can this really be true? It seems incredible that Freemasonry, this system of morality, may actually be veiled paganism and only lightly veiled at that. The point within a circle is one of the more prominent Masonic symbols. Past grandmaster Albert Mackie teaches in his symbolism of Freemasonry, page 353, the point within a circle is derived from sun worship and is in reality of phallic origin. It is a symbol of the universe, the sun being represented by the point while the circumference is the universe. Mackie states further in his manual of the lodge page 56. The phallus was an imitation of the male generative organ. It was represented usually by a column which was surmounted by a circle at its base. The point within a circle was intended by the ancients as a type of the prolific powers of nature which they worshipped under the united form of the active or male principle and the passive or female principle. Paganism recognized and worshiped these powers as the creative force in nature. Albert Pike was grand commander of Scottish Rite Freemasonry in the eighteen hundreds. From his book Morals and Dogma, the sun and moon represents the two grand principles of all generations, the active and passive, the male and female, both shed their light upon their offspring, the blazing star or Horus. These Masonic authorities agree that the symbols of Freemasonry are occultic and derived from paganism. The alleged occultic rituals and symbolism that are central to Freemasonry were tremendously significant to me personally. I had been deeply involved in the many facets of the occult, including witchcraft for a number of years. Witchcraft is the religion of paganism. It's the worship of the sun god and the moon goddess in various forms. I was involved Speaker 4: in the occult for about twelve years. Steve Warren was Speaker 0: a practicing member of a couple Speaker 4: of for me. That is I was constantly on a day to day basis reading, searching, as well as practicing arts such as divination, getting in contact with the dead through mediums, tarot cards, crystal balls. Everything that we would consider a cult, I was involved in. Speaker 5: There's a great deal of symbolism in witchcraft itself. Many of the implements used have significance in terms of natural elements such as the wand representing air, athame, a sword representing fire, a chalice with water, or an appendogram representing earth. And these were would be combined in various manners in order to take advantage of the spiritual forces that were felt to be in operation at that particular time. Speaker 4: And it was heavily ritualistic with wearing of robes, the drawing of magic circles, the invoking of gods, to aid the practitioner, as well as, just anything you would do, even if it was not in a formal ritual, always had something to do with ritual. Even if was casting a spell, you would always light the candle, bring out the elements, set up your altar. Some of Speaker 0: the parallels between Freemasonry and witchcraft show such a similarity that it cannot possibly be coincidental. Similarities in ritual, wording, and symbolism are so close in several instances that it clearly suggests a common origin. To examine this possibility, I spoke with a number of former Masons and compared their Blue Lodge initiations with the experiences of former occultists. Speaker 6: In the initiation in Freemasonry, we had to be recommended by another Mason. Speaker 5: Well, in order to join witchcraft, you have to be first screened. You have to be recommended by somebody currently in witchcraft. Speaker 7: Well, when I was initiated, I was blindfolded and bound by a rope, and on your bare chest was thrust a point Speaker 4: of a spear. In witchcraft, we were initiated through a a very involved ritual initiation ceremony wherein the candidate was led blindfolded, bound by a rope to the edge of the magic circle. Speaker 7: And the rope is around your neck and your lid forward. And up front in the eastern end of Speaker 4: the building is a person who's a worshipful master. And you kneel down before him as if he were a god. You were met by the high priest or high priestess at that time, usually with a sword to your chest. Speaker 8: When I went to enter the lodge, a sharp object was put to my left breast. And I was warned that should I reveal any of the secrets of Freemasonry, to know what to expect. Speaker 5: When you're presented before the high priest, a sword is held against your chest, and you actually take a blood oath promising to remain faithful to the secrets of witchcraft. Speaker 7: Well, when you are in the room, this, blindfold is taken away from you, and this is a time when they say that you're coming from darkness into light. Speaker 5: During the initiation ceremony, the the initiate is led by the lieutenant of the high priest and is challenged at the edge of the circle by someone saying, who goes there? And the answer is one from the world of darkness. Speaker 6: In masonry, the prayers are ended with so mote it be. Speaker 4: Oh, and one of the other aspects of or distinctives of the craft was that we would always end any spell or ritual where we release the powers, where the power was released, with the word so mode it be. Speaker 0: I was intrigued to discover that witchcraft and Freemasonry had so much in common. However, in white witchcraft, followers dismissed the biblical concept of Lucifer. Freemasonry goes so far as to actually call Lucifer god. In the words of sovereign pontiff of universal Freemasonry Albert Pike, yes, Lucifer is god, and unfortunately, Adonai, the Hebrew god of the bible, is also God. And the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonai. But Lucifer, God of light and God of good, is struggling for humanity against Adonai, the God of darkness and evil. Listen to the words of thirty third degree mason, Manly p Hall. When the mason learns that the key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo living power, he has learned the mystery of his craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands, and before he may step onward and upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply this energy. Of the literally millions of Masons worldwide, how many of them are actually aware of the true meaning of the Masonic symbols? The answer is very few. Since most Masons never go past the third degree of the Blue Lodge, the the rank of master Mason, the vast majority of them never discover what they're involved in. And they never will discover what free masonry is all about unless they venture into the higher levels of the Scottish Rite or the York Rite. In fact, they're not just ignorant, they're deliberately misled by their superiors in the lodge. In the words of Masonry's own authority, Albert Pike, the blue degrees are but the outer court or portico of the temple. Part of the symbols are displayed there to the initiate but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not intended that he shall understand them but it is intended that he shall imagine that he understands them. Speaker 2: And many Masons go through the first three degrees, become a master Mason, and they just quit there thinking that this is just a nice fraternal organization. And they do not realize that their own leaders have consciously lied and deceived to them because they do not want them to know the true teachings of masonry. Speaker 6: I went in there with all good intentions, thinking I was entering into a fraternity that was really interested in helping people. But now I realize that in the lower echelons, in the lower degrees, you don't realize what what's happening. Speaker 7: Well, the meaning of the lodge and what it was about to me was a group of people who were out to help other people, and there were different things that you could see in the lodge. The people were close together. They were bound by Speaker 8: something, and I thought it was a Christian organization. What made one think that the lodge was a Christian place was the fact that I found people who were members of the same church to which I belong, the Presbyterian Church in Canada, were members of the lodge, members in prominent positions in the lodge. And the fact that these members in their rituals used quotations from scripture sort of doubly made one think that it was okay. Speaker 0: They think that they are actually being initiated into a Christian organization. And it's because the three degrees in in the Blue Lodge are veiled in a in a veneer of Christianity. Jesus Christ is central to the Christian faith. In fact, without him, there is no Christianity. That is because Christ claimed to be God incarnate, and as such, Christ cannot be separated from his teachings. He did not teach a system of morality to lead one to God. Instead, he claimed to be the way to the father. But what is the official Masonic teaching about Jesus Christ? Listen again to supreme pontiff of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, Albert Pike. It, Masonry, references all the great reformers. It sees in Moses, the lawgiver of the Jews, in Confucius and Zoroaster, in Jesus of Nazareth, and in the Arabian iconoclast, great teachers of morality and eminent reformers, if no more. In other words, Jesus Christ is reduced to being a great reformer, no different than Confucius or Zoroaster. But the bible says plainly in acts chapter four, neither is there salvation in any other, for there is none other name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved. The very essence of Christianity is man's inability to save himself. For this cause, God sent his only begotten son to die on the cross and make atonement for us. How different this is from the teaching of Manly Hall in his book, the lost keys of freemasonry. The true Mason is not creed bound. He realizes with the divine illumination of his lodge that as a Mason, his religion must be universal. Christ, Buddha, or Mohammed, the name means little, for he recognizes only the light and not the light bearer. He worships at every shrine, bows before every altar, whether in temple, mosque, pagoda, cathedral, and realizes with his true understanding the oneness of all spiritual truths. No true mason can be narrow for his lodge is the divine expression of all broadness. No true mason can be narrow for his lodge is the divine expression of all broadness. An interesting statement since in the Speaker 2: bible Jesus Christ says, broad is the way that leadeth to destruction and many there be which go in there at because straight is the gate and narrow is the way which leadeth unto life and few there be that find it. When Mason say that Jesus Christ is simply another great moral teacher, another great moral prophet, equal with Buddha. In fact, Masons teach according to Albert Pike that Buddha was the first great Masonic teacher. So they're equating Jesus with Buddha, with Mohammed, with the religious leaders as just another religious leader. He is not God. He is not the incarnate savior who came to save men from their sins because Masons do not need a savior. Masons feel they can save themselves through moral good deeds. In the Speaker 3: lodge that I belong to, we had a Muslim apply for membership. And the membership of our lodge didn't know how to initiate him because we knew we couldn't initiate him on the holy bible. So we wrote a letter to the Grand Lodge of Alberta, asking him for instruction. And a letter came back stating that we should place the Koran and the square and compass beside the Bible and the square and compass on the altar and initiating with full honors. Speaker 0: Bible believing Christians accept the fact that God exists in a trinity of three persons, that is father, son, and holy spirit. But what most people, including many Masons, don't realize is that the god of Speaker 2: free Masons, the great architect of the universe, is also a trinity. In both the Scottish and York Rite, you discover that Masons are on a journey seeking to find the lost name of God. Part of their religion, they say, is that the sacred name of God has been lost. And they tell this whole story of the building of Solomon's Temple and the architect, Hiram Abif, who in building the temple lost the sacred name of God. And so they say that Masons are on this search to recover the the lost name of God. And finally, when you get to the royal arch degree, the Mason is finally told what the secret name of God is that only Masons can know. And they pride themselves that they alone are the custodians of the secret name of God. And that name can only be whispered among Masons by three Masons each saying a syllable. The name is Jubilant. It is a combination of three words, Jehovah, Baal, and Osiris, the Egyptian sun god. And what a Mason is worshiping in the Masonic Lodge is a three headed god made up of Jehovah, Baal, which was a fertility god of Baal back in Lebanon, and Osiris, the Egyptian sun god represented by the phallic symbol, the sexual, worship in Egypt. And they have combined this into a three headed monster and say that is the Masonic god they worship. Speaker 0: Salvation to the Christian is based entirely upon the vicarious sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross. The Bible teaches that all have sinned and come short of the glory of God. It teaches that no matter how hard we work to be good, we can never attain to the standards of the sinless almighty. But God gives the free gift of eternal life to those who believe in Jesus Christ and allow him to pay for their sins on his cross. In the words of John three sixteen, for God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believeth in him should not perish but have everlasting life. Salvation to the Mason is something entirely different. Masons are counting on their own good works, something that the Bible says cannot possibly save them. In fact, the Masonic monitor teaches that God, the all seeing eye, will reward men according to their works. The all seeing eye pervades the inmost recesses of the human heart and will reward us according to our merits. In the nineteenth degree of the Scottish Rite, the Mason is told, Masons who have given proof of their attachment to the statutes and rules of the order, which in the end will make them deserving of entering the celestial Jerusalem or heaven. The twenty eighth degree of the Scottish Rite states, Speaker 2: the true Mason raises himself by degrees till he reaches heaven. Masons believe that they can earn their salvation and they they can climb a ladder up to God. They call the great architect of the universe. And that one day they'll stand before God and God will usher them into heaven, not because of Jesus Christ, but because they were a good Mason and they did all of these good works. In fact, I was speaking to the head potentate of the shrine in Minneapolis where I'm from. He called me up one day and he had heard my tape on masonry. He says, how dare you say that masonry is not Christian? He says, I'm a deacon in my church. I teach Sunday school in my church. He says, I'm a good Christian. He says, and I'm the head of the shrine. How can you say I'm not a Christian? And I stopped and I asked him one question. I said, well, sir, I said, you were to die and stand before God tonight and he should ask you, why should I let you into my heaven? I said, what would you say to him? I'll never forget there was a silence for about ten, fifteen seconds. And and then he said to me, he said, well, I guess I would tell him I was a good Mason. If Masons Speaker 0: are depending upon the lodge to save them, then their trust is as misplaced as those who depend upon church membership rather than on Christ. One might just as well depend on belonging to the Kiwanis or rotary club if good works would save us. Speaker 2: I was speaking down in in Texas, in South Texas, where, in a large church, the Masons, who were in the church, many of them on the elder board, saw my tape Sunday morning when I was speaking there and they said, you know, why are we allowing this man into our church? He's criticizing Freemasonry. And most of the elder board were Masons. The Sunday school teachers were Masons. In fact, one of the elders was the worshipful master of the lodge in town. Another one was the supreme potentate of the shrine. And they came to me after the service and I said, well, you have the books. I said, look up in your own books in context what I say. I gave the chapters of the page numbers. They spent till four in the morning, Sunday night, going through all the documentation in their own Masonic library. They came back Monday and they said, we want you to know, Ron, we all resigned from the lodge last night. And we are seeing this happen all across the country as Masons will peel away the outer wrapping of the package and examine the content of what they're in. They will discover that they are in a non christian pagan idolatrous cult and no christian has any part in it. Speaker 0: In this video, we've tried to be objective. We have no axe to grind either with organized freemasonry or with individual masons. There's absolutely no doubt that a great deal of good has been done in the name of Freemasonry. And the morals of many, if not most Masons, are of a very high order indeed. But that is unfortunately not the issue here. The real issue is that Masonry is a pagan religion that has more in common with witchcraft than Christianity. Speaker 7: This is a time when they say that you're coming from darkness into light. Speaker 0: Its god is not the god of the bible. Its god is Jobulon, a composite of Jehovah, Baal, the Canaanite fertility deity, and An or Osiris, the Egyptian sun god of phallic worship. Its means of salvation is not the cross of Christ, but a system of morality and good works to endeavor to attain to the celestial lodge. And to the Mason, Jesus Christ is not the sinless son of God, but is degraded to the position of being just a great reformer, no different than Buddha, Confucius, Muhammad. It is here where we take issue with Freemasonry. The same Jesus who claimed to be God in human flesh also claimed to be the only way to the father. He also said that a man cannot serve two masters. If you are a Mason, you must make a decision. You cannot be a Christian and remain in the Masonic lodge. Either let your sins be nailed to the cross of Jesus Christ, the son of God, or try to pay for them yourself in the system of morality and good works. There are verses in the bible that state Speaker 3: that we should come out from wrong. That darkness has no relationship with light. And also in the book of Proverbs it states that there is a way that seems right to a man, but it leads to death. And so therefore my advice is to walk away from it.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/zg2MO74mR9

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Jews - Jesuits - Freemasons - Luciferians - Pike - Lincoln - The Vatican - Palestine - Communism https://t.co/kokbkjDFns

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript traverses a panorama of alleged occult conspiracies surrounding secret societies, notably Freemasonry, the Illuminati, and Jesuit influence, linking historical figures to a hidden plan to control world events. It asserts that leaders like Alemni, Mazini, and their successors were formative in a covert framework that guides revolutions from behind the scenes. A central claim is that Mazzini wrote to his associate Doctor Bridenstain about forming “an association of brothers” that is secret even to the veterans and to those leading revolutions, a group responsible for manipulating world events from the shadows. The text then identifies Albert Pike as a later head of the Luciferian conspiracy, claiming he authored a letter to the Palladian Council dated 07/14/1889. This purported letter allegedly describes a doctrine in which “we worship God” is said to be a God “without superstition,” and asserts that “Lucifer is God” while Adonai (the Christian God) is the equal of Christ, with Jesus depicted as evil and Lucifer as good. The material further claims that the plan is to unleash nihilists and atheists to provoke a social cataclysm, culminating in the destruction of Christianity and atheism, followed by the restoration of “the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer.” The narrative connects this to Pike’s alleged plan for three world wars, including opening up Palestine, creating a state in Palestine, and then provoking an international war to redraw global power. The text references Ellen White (Evangelism, page 6,231) warning of powers from beneath working to bring about last-day drama, including deception by secret societies and confederacies. It cites Alastair Crowley (Edward Alexander Crowley) as an exemplar of the mind in the “spawn of the Jesuit order” and describes his alleged communication with an extraterrestrial being named Aiwass in 1904, resulting in the Book of the Law. It is claimed Crowley’s practice revealed “the royal secret of Masonry” concerning immortality through Tantric sex magic, alleging that some Masons use sexual perversion to access alternate universes and live forever by vampirizing children, a claim presented without qualifiers. The transcript then expands to post-Crowley influence, naming Timothy Leary as an illuminant of Thanateros and linking him to Crowley’s lineage, as well as L. Ron Hubbard and the beginnings of Scientology, Jack Parsons, Charles Manson, and the OTO network. It asserts connections to popular culture and literature, including references to Jimmy Page, David Bowie, Ozzy Osbourne, JK Rowling, Ian Fleming, and even the Beatles’ Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, suggesting occult themes permeate modern culture. The discussion culminates with the assertion that occult doctrines fueled the 1960s counterculture and caused numerous devastating outcomes, asserting a continuing presence and influence of these secret traditions in contemporary society.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In time, a man by the name Alemni and then this man Mazini became a leader in the world revolution, but not fully inducted into the secret orders. And he says it says, research dug up letters from Mazzini which revealed how the high priests of the Luciferian creed keep their identity and true purpose secret. In a letter Mazzini wrote to his revolutionary associate, doctor. Bridenstain, only a few years before he died. He said, we form an association of brothers in all parts of the globe. We wish to break every yoke. Yet there is one unseen that can be hardly felt. Yet it weighs on us. Whence comes it? Where is it? No one knows, or at least no one tells. This association is secret, even to us, the veterans of the secret society. Even to those involved in leading out in world revolutions, it was a secret society controlling them behind the scenes. This man took over after Mazzini. He was a commander in the Northern the southern armies. After the war, he settled down to study in Arkansas. And from there, this man with a tremendous mind became one of the world's most renowned authorities on pagan idolatry. He became the leader of the Illuminati in time. This that I'm about to read is a letter to the Palladian Council written 07/14/1889 from Albert Pike. He, like Weishaupt, was the head of the Luciferian conspiracy in his day, pawns in the game by Guy Carr. And here is the letter. That which we say to the crowd is we worship God, but it is a God that one worships without superstition. Religion should be by all us initiates of the high degree maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine. Yes, Lucifer is God. And unfortunately, Adonai, the name they give the Christians is God also for the absolute can exist only as two gods. Though so they're saying that Jesus or God is both good and evil. And the good part of it they're saying is Lucifer and the evil is Jesus Christ. Thus, the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy. They don't believe in Satan. They believe that Jesus is evil, not Satan. And the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Christ or Adani, but Lucifer, God of light and God of good, is struggling for humanity against Adani, the god of darkness and evil. Albert Pike. Isn't that amazing what these people believe? They're worshippers of Lucifer. And friends, this is their plan. We shall unleash the nihilists and the atheists, those who are working in favor of the Christian world, the atheists who are working against it. And we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm, which in all its horror will show clear to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, the origin of savagery, and the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere the citizens obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries will exterminate those destroyers of civilization civilization and the multitude disillusioned with Christianity, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer. Finally, out in public view, a manifestation which will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism both conquered and exterminated at the same time. They want another war, folks. It was Albert Pike who laid out the plan for three world wars. One, to open up Palestine, two, to form a state in Palestine between the second and third to raise the Arab world and the world of Israel. And once they were armed and ready and the world was siding on one side or another, they would form an international war. And that war is on our horizon today. Ellen White told us in Evangelism page six twenty three, a power from beneath is working to bring about the last great scenes in the drama. Satan coming as Christ and working with all deceivableness of unrighteousness and those who are binding themselves together in secret societies. Those who are yielding to the passion for confederacy are working out the plans of the enemy. The cause will be followed by the effect. For a hundred years, we may have had the privilege of knowing what was going on in those secret societies through inspiration. An example of the kind of mind that exists in the spawn of the Jesuit order can be seen in this man Alastair Crowley. Seeker societies and subversive movements by Nesta Webster tells us that this conspiracy took place among the Jews. And I'm sure that much of it has taken a place in the Sanhedrin circles, but the fiery Jesuits describes clearly that the control of the money in this world is in the hands of the Roman Catholic church today and especially in the hands of the Jesuits. They're the ones that claim to become the Jew among the Jews. They're leading out in the Zionist conspiracy. It was their interests that fomented the writing of the communist manifesto. It was their interests that financed this man to go in, Lenin, to go in and cause the revolution. The church was hoping to conquer the Eastern Orthodox Church. This revolution has not stopped. The communists may have left her in that revolution and took it for themselves, but the the war continues today. 01/04/1862, Ellen White tells us, I was shown before Lincoln's administration, the former administration planned and managed for the South to rob the North of implements of war. They were contemplating a determined rebellion or revolution. The North did not understand the bitter dreadful hatred of the South towards them and were unprepared for the deep laid plots. Volume one of the testimony is two fifty three. What was behind these deep laid plots? In the book, Fifty Years in the Church of Rome by father Ciniqui, he tells us that he had hired Lincoln to be his lawyer to protect him against a suit from the church. Lincoln was faithful and the man was gotten off. And this is a signature on the letter of the IOU found in the book of Lincoln. Listen to the words here. Dear mister Lincoln, I answer I answered, allow me to tell you that the joy I should naturally feel for such a victory is destroyed in my mind by the fear of what it may cost you. There were then in the crowd not less than 10 or 12 Jesuits from Chicago and Saint Louis who came to hear my sins of condemnation to the penitentiary. But it was on their heads that you have brought the thunders of heaven and earth. Nothing can be compared to the expression of their rage against you when you not only wrenched me from their cruel hands, but you were making the walls of the courthouse tremble under the awful superhumanly eloquent denunciation of their infamy, diabolical malice, and total want of Christian human principle in the plot they had formed for my destruction. What troubles my soul just now and draws tears to my eyes is that it seems to me that I have read your sentence of death in their fiendish eyes. How many other noble victims have fallen have already fallen at their feet? This man was responsible for opening up trade with Russia and recognizing a political connection with Rome. He also placed this Masonic symbol on our dollar. Novus Ordus Florum, a new world order. Speaker 1: Albert Pike said this about Freemasonry in this very book. He says that Freemasonry is based almost totally on the Kabbalah. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: Jewish magic. Yes. And many Jewish rabbis have admitted this and they say Speaker 2: As we have seen, when the greatest rabbis of the Talmud consider the raping and sodomizing of little girls and boys to be normal, it is little wonder that such perverse moral attitudes filter into the content of the Jewish film industry. The Zohar or Kabbalah like the Talmud is also considered to be divinely inspired by religious Jews. It says that when God will reveal himself preceding the coming of Messiah, the Gentiles will be wiped off the earth. Redemption will not be complete until Amalek or Gentiles will be exterminated. Speaker 1: That in all of the rituals of Freemasonry, you will find the Kabbalah, the system of magic of the Jews. For example, the thirtieth degree of Freemasonry is the Knights of Kedosh. Yes. And it involves skulls and black robes and a a knight knight laying in a coffin speaking from the dead. Yes. And all of this this turning to the God of the underworld, the gods of the underworld is all related to Jewish Kabbalah because they believe in necromancy Yes. Communication with the dead. They believe that at the in the last days, a kabbalistic master will come upon the earth and there will be a Jewish utopia, a new world order of the Jews But they must go along with what are called the Noahide laws and the good Gentiles and go along with Kabbalah. And if they if they are and if they recognize that the Holy Spirit is the serpent. And by the way, that's also taught in the thirty second degree of Freemasonry that that is the serpent is the holy spirit. Speaker 3: This is Edward Alexander Crowley, also known as Alastair Crowley. He styled himself the wickedest man in the world. He believed himself to be the great beast, and he changed his name to Alastair Crowley so he it would add up in both English, Hebrew, and Greek Kabbalah as 666. In nineteen o four, Crowley had a communication with an extraterrestrial being named Ewas. And this being, through his wife, kind of a channeling type operation, brought forth a book that was called the book of the law in nineteen o four. And this book declared that the slain and risen god had stepped off the throne and that a new god, the crowned and conquering child, was taking his place. He was a brilliant genius. He could play eight chess games blindfolded. He was an accomplished poet, mountaineer, painter, writer. He had so many Masonic degrees that you could fill up five pages of a book with them. This guy was probably the most highly honored Mason in the world, and he began doing rituals to bring forth this crowned and conquering child. And he began to start what he called the cult of the fascinating child. And in doing this, he uncovered without knowing it, the royal secret of Masonry. And what happened was a gentleman came knocking at his door after he published a book. And in this book, he it was a book of poetry. And in the book, he had made an allusion to something. And this guy named his name was Theodor Reuss. He was a German occultist and the head of the OTO, the Ordo Templi Orientis, which stands for the Order of Eastern Templars. There's the Knights Templar again. And this Theodore Royce told Crowley that he had given away the greatest secret in occult history. And Crowley said, what do you mean? I don't even understand it. So the guy promptly initiated him on the spot to the ninth degree of the OTO and then explained the secret to him. And you're about to learn what this secret is. The secret is that as a Mason, you are promised immortality. Where do they get their promise of immortality? Simply, the secret that Crowley uncovered, probably through demonic intervention, is the secret that this immortality is conveyed through Tantric sex magic. And the kind of sex magic that is we're talking about here, unfortunately, is a sexual violation of a little child. Crowley taught that the way you could live forever was by vampirizing little children sexually. And this I apologize that this is so horrible, but but Masons are doing this. Not all Masons. Please understand me. Probably one in a 100 knows about this. But this is a significant enough problem that I feel compelled to share it with you. This is why the Masons believe that they will live forever. They think every time they defile a little child, they steal some of that child's youth. What happens then is they believe that they are accessing alternate universes, alternate realities where they can become as gods. They there is a belief that through this sexual perversion, they can access these tunnels into alternate universes, alternate realities. And the goal of this kind of magic is to find your own universe and become the god over that universe. And then once you're the god of this universe, you can start sucking the energy out of it, and you can use that energy through this child to live forever and ever and ever. I mean, we're getting this is such a problem that we are actually I now know of five national support groups that are helping people that are survivors of Masonic ritual abuse. Speaker 4: What is vital to consider is the significance of what occurred after Crowley's death and who followed his teachings wholly or in part. Speaker 5: Crowley did not had many followers. He he had followers through his magical organization, the OTO, which still exists today. He also had people who are very interested in him who carried on his tradition. For example, Timothy Leary, who people perceive a guru, but he was also an illuminant of Thanateros, which is an offshoot of Crowley's kind of OTO and his magical practice. He copied a lot of Crowley's behaviors and what Crowley did. He attacked Christianity. He was hedonist like Crowley. He visited the pyramid, Great Pyramid Of Chaos and stayed in there much like Crowley did. He also traveled to Algeria where Crowley emulated the magical practices or nokin calls of John Dee and Edward Kelly. He carried Crowley's top tarot deck wherever he went. And he actually inverted a he wrote a book called Confessions of a Hope Fiend, which is an inversion of two of Crowley's books called Confessions and Diary of a Hope Fiend. Mhmm. Speaker 6: Well, I've been an admirer of Aleister Crowley. I think that I'm carrying on much of the work that he started over a hundred years ago, and I think the sixties themselves. You know, Crowley said he was in favor of of finding your own self and and do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law under love. It was a very powerful statement. I'm sorry he isn't around now to appreciate the glories that he started. Speaker 5: L. Hubbard said he was following on his tradition. He actually started his religion or his new, you know, new age ideal church, the Church of Scientology on the day that Crowley died in 1947. These people have a great influence on the world. There was Jack Parsons, and he was the head of the Agape Lodge, which was the OTO lodge out in California. And his scribe was actually L. Ron Hubbard. Charles Manson was a member of the Solar Lodge, which is an offshoot of the OTO. So Manson was very much knowledgeable and or very knowledgeable about these kind of practices, and he had an immense influence upon the '60s. Alfred Kinsey visited Alistair Crowley's Abbey of Falima, which was his kind of, the inversion of a church that he had in Cefalut, Sicily, and very dark rituals took place there. There were also musical followers, Jimmy Page, David Bowie, Ozzy Osbourne. There's his ideas suffuse JK Rowling's books by Harry Potter. And I haven't read all of her books, but her movies and what I've seen the references to Flood and Sirius, these are all high highly occultic references that indicate that she knows quite a bit more than she's telling to the public. And, you know, these are books and movies that have been seen by billions of people. Ian Fleming was influenced by Crowley. He wrote the James Bond book. So it goes on and on. So they're still out here together. There's a commonly understood reference to Crowley and sergeant Pepper's Lonely Club band. I was gonna mention that. Of course, Crowley appears on the cover twice, he? And I think I think I know it just once, but there's also the kind of a a story about, you know, the intro to sergeant Pepper. This is twenty years ago today. Mhmm. Sergeant Pepper told the taught the band to play, and somebody told me that that was a reference to Crowley. That was twenty years ago today that to that day that Crowley passed away. So June was when he died, and I guess the album came out in '67. So and Lennon himself was a known occultist. He was he would constantly go to occult bookstores in New York City and, you know, had some of his his writings, Imagine, and, you know, all these other songs and stuff reference a lot of cult subjects. Speaker 4: Occult doctrines have led to the nineteen sixties counter culture and led countless people down a path that has seen devastating results.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/brQvxz2ERv

@HistoryArcs - History Arc

🔯 Germany Shuts Down Secret Societies? During WW2, wherever Germany found itself occupying an area in Europe, they dissolved Masonic organizations, confiscated their assets and documents. The contents were then revealed to the world what these Freemason societies contained.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/WrCln9F2cK

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Anti Freemason/Occult Propaganda in Nazi Germany. https://t.co/eAW5Yydpn6

VoxExVeritas
Posted - November 25, 2025 at 9:16 PM
Saved - December 26, 2025 at 12:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread argues that Michael Chertoff, with Israeli and Zionist ties, shaped U.S. security policy after 9/11 to favor Israel. It claims he helped author the Patriot Act, directed the DOJ to shield Israeli suspects, and restructured Homeland Security to mirror Israeli methods and boost Israeli security contractors. It also details a network of allies (Ashcroft, Mueller, Lieberman) enabling this influence and notes his post-government profiteering.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Michael Chertoff - 2nd DHS Sec. - Zionist🧵 We basically let an israeli run US HOMELAND SECURITY ... at the same time the DHS Twitter account was created. Michael Chertoff was appointed to head the 9/11 criminal investigation by Bush. He let the Dancing Israelis go. His father was a rabbi and Talmud teacher. His mother Livia Eisen was the first "hostess" of Israel Mossad El Al airlines. Chertoff also co-authored the Patriot Act He now sits on the advisory board for Carbyne

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Israeli Control Over U.S. Emergency Systems?🧵 Carbyne, an Israeli technology company, is now integrated into emergency systems in 23 U.S. states, including major cities like New York City, Miami, and Atlanta. Its platform allows: Real-time video from callers Precise location tracking of devices Data transmission directly to first responders On the surface, it improves emergency response—but the centralization of sensitive data in a foreign-linked system raises serious concerns. 🔹 U.S. Operations Headquarters & R&D: New York City / Tel Aviv Adoption: Integrated with local 911/emergency centers across multiple states Data Flow Risk: All emergency calls, location, and live video feeds pass through Carbyne’s servers, potentially accessible to Israeli-linked personnel 🔹Controversy Ties to Former Israeli PM Ehud Barak: Raises questions about the company’s intelligence connections Foreign Influence Risk: Emergency systems are critical infrastructure, and a foreign-linked platform controlling real-time location and communication could be exploited for surveillance or manipulation Potential AI Overreach: If AI is used to monitor or triage calls, it could pre-screen, flag, or log citizens’ activity in ways that bypass local oversight 🔹 Why This Matters Data Security: Sensitive personal data from U.S. citizens flows through a foreign-linked system. Privacy Risk: Emergency calls often include highly personal information; misuse could be catastrophic. Precedent for Foreign-Controlled AI Surveillance: Sets a framework for other Israeli-linked AI tools to enter critical U.S. systems. Sources: Wikipedia – Carbyne: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbyne_(company) Emergency System Integration: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbyne_(company) Controversy/Ties to Ehud Barak: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbyne_(company)

Carbyne (company) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Carbyne (company) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Carbyne (company) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The Interview + The Leak : Is The Cover-Up Exposed? Carbyne | Theil | Epstein | Ehud Barack FULL📺@IanCarrollShow

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript covers several interwoven topics and claims: - Ghislaine Maxwell and Trump administration connections: Maxwell was allegedly hired to do PR for the Trump administration last month when she sat for an interview with Todd Blanche, Trump’s former personal attorney and now deputy attorney general. The segment characterizes the piece as deal-making, with Maxwell purportedly giving glowing testimony about Trump to help address the Epstein files in exchange for a cushier, minimum-security prison placement and possible pardon considerations. The speaker says this is “insane from start to finish” and criticizes Trump supporters’ reactions. - Epstein/Maxwell trial details and evidence: The speaker asserts that the worldwide sex trafficking network was exposed, leaders identified (one allegedly died mysteriously in prison; the other was convicted in court). Maxwell’s trial is described as featuring “the four best witnesses” from a pool of more than 100 accusers. Maxwell is said to have been convicted by a jury on trafficking-related charges based on “mountains of evidence” including documentation, photos, videos, and financials, not only victim testimony. Maxwell is said to have recruited young girls in person, with specifics on where recruitment occurred, amounts paid, and tactics used, as well as how it was covered up. The speaker claims co-conspirators remained free, and over 100 corroborating witnesses provided consistent narratives. Maxwell allegedly faced two counts of perjury, which the DOJ settled to secure the trafficking conviction, and the perjury charges were not tried. The speaker asserts that conspiracy theories about the case are dangerous. - Alleged lies in Maxwell’s testimony: Maxwell allegedly claimed there were never cameras inside Epstein’s homes or in “inappropriate” rooms, with explicit language such as “no cameras anywhere outside of possibly things that would, I would consider normal.” The speaker contends there are “literal photos of cameras in his bedroom,” FBI seizure of binders with photos and videos, and other evidence of cameras and blackmail. Maxwell is said to have claimed she never recruited anyone from Mar-a-Lago, contradicting Trump’s corroboration that Virginia Roberts Giuffre was recruited from Mar-a-Lago. The photo of Maxwell with Virginia Giuffre and Prince Andrew in Maxwell’s London apartment is cited as evidence of the involvement of Epstein trafficking networks; the speaker notes it has been verified by forensic experts and a photographer, including a Walgreens-developed stamp on the back implying a 2001 development date. - Photo controversy and settlements: The photo is described as genuine, with multiple verifications. It is claimed Prince Andrew paid millions to Virginia Giuffre to avoid facing her in open court, and Maxwell allegedly paid Virginia millions to settle a defamation suit. - Leaked emails involving Ehud Barak: The speaker discusses newly highlighted emails from Ehud Barak that appeared online, stating there are over 100,000 emails to and from Barak that have been circulated and verified, with a time span of 10/10/2014 to 09/09/2015. The dataset reportedly contains over 83 emails between Jeffrey Epstein and Ehud Barak, many short and focused on arranging meetings, access, money, and investments. The company Reporti (now Carbine 911), an Israeli cyber tech company, is mentioned as a recurring topic, with Epstein and Barak involved in investing alongside Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund (Thiel’s fund invested $15,000,000 in 2018; Epstein invested $1,000,000 in 2016 via offshore shell companies). Johnny Vedmore’s reporting on Nicole Junkerman and related pieces is noted. The speaker mentions an online intelligence service Barak reportedly subscribed to for $3,000 annually that monitored powerful people (Clintons, Gates, Bezos, Putin, Netanyahu) and suggests patterns of surveillance on major figures. - Other ongoing stories: The presenter notes additional stories, including Trump allegedly “going socialist” and nationalizing part of Intel, CDC leadership disputes involving Bobby Kennedy and Susan Menoras, and labor actions by CDC staff. The Israel-Gaza situation is described with claims of civilian casualty rates at 83% of deaths in Gaza, two separate strikes on a hospital, and PR responses by Israel. The transcript also references Ron DeSantis launching an Israel license plate in Florida, Beverly Hills voting to display Israeli flags in public schools, and public backlash leading to backpedaling. A closing critique links ethnonationalist ideology to Nazi Germany, questioning the notion of Jews as God’s chosen people. - Closing notes: The host promises more reporting on these topics, mentions upcoming collaborations and documentaries, and signs off with personal reminders. A closing line from Speaker 1 remarks that “Our security is at stake.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In other psyop news, Ghislaine Maxwell was hired to do PR for the Trump administration last month when she sat down for an interview with Trump's former personal attorney and now deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche. The piece was so obviously just deal making that Ghislain would give glowing testimony about Trump to help clean up the massive shit tornado that has been his handling of the Epstein files. And in exchange, Trump moved her to a cushy new minimum security prison where she'll be more comfortable. I'm sure that she's also angling for a pardon by the end of his term. But the whole situation is just so insane from start to finish, and the response from Trump supporters was one of the most depressing things you could ever Like, let's be clear. We discovered the world's most prolific child sex trafficking and blackmail ring. We took down the two apparent leaders of the network. One allegedly died mysteriously in prison while all the cameras were off and the guards were napping. And the other stood trial and was convicted in a court of law. In Ghislain's trial, they chose to put the four best witnesses on the stand out of a pool of more than 100 accusers. She was convicted by a jury because of the mountains of evidence that proves her involvement, not just victim testimony, documentation, photos, videos, financials. We know that Maxwell was recruiting these incredibly young girls herself in person. We know where she was recruiting them from. We know how much she was paying them. We know the tactics that she was using, what she was saying. We know how they were covering it up. We know where the money was being banked, we know who the co conspirators were despite them all still walking free, and we have over 100 corroborating witnesses, basically all telling versions of the same story. Ghislain Maxwell was also charged with two counts of perjury perjury that never actually went to trial because the DOJ agreed to settle those counts in order to secure the more important trafficking conviction. The perjury charges didn't go away because they weren't true, they never went to trial at all because they wanted to get things over with and put a bow on it. The conspiracy theories are dangerous. Speaker 1: Information is the oxygen of the democracy. He's so sick that he can't talk. Speaker 0: And then when Trump is in hot water over Epstein, he sends his good buddy, Todd Blanche, to record a puff piece where Maxwell tells all the same lies she told on the stand that are demonstrably false, and now you're supposed to believe her. Like, just stop and think about this for one second. Imagine that you lock up a murderer after an extensive trial with heaps of evidence, and he's convicted on all that evidence even though he says that he didn't do anything wrong. Right? And then a year later, you go to him in jail and say, hey, did you do it? And he says, no. And so you're like, oh, shit. Dude, this dude must be innocent. He says he didn't do it. Case closed. Let's get this guy out. Set him free. He's all good, bro. That is what this thing with Ghislain is. Okay? Here are just a couple of the blatant lies that Ghislain told in her testimony. She said that there were never any cameras inside of any of Epstein's homes and certainly never in any inappropriate pray places like a bedroom or a bathroom. She said this multiple times in very explicit and detailed language. Like here, where she said, quote, no cameras anywhere outside of possibly things that would, I would consider myself, I would consider normal. So the garage gate, something like that. A front door, Todd adds, outside like security cameras? Yeah. Security cameras. And again, here, as just one more example of several where Todd Blanche said, but from what you know, you do not believe a camera exists or a video camera or a camera that takes pictures inside of any of his residences. Correct. Despite the fact that we have literal photos of cameras in his bedroom. Right? Despite the fact the FBI confiscated binders of photos and videos on CDs from Epstein's mansion when they raided it and reported finding hidden cameras throughout the house. That is just scratching the surface of the evidence of video cameras and sexual blackmail that we have. Ghislain also claimed that she never recruited anyone from Mar a Lago, which is where Virginia Gafre was recruited from. Okay, except that Trump himself has corroborated that Virginia was recruited from Mar a Lago. And I can't help but notice that mister Blanche didn't even ask Ghislain about one of the most significant pieces of evidence in the whole story, probably in the whole world. This photo of her with Prince Andrew and Virginia Gafre taken in Ghislain's own apartment in London. So if Ghislain didn't recruit and traffic children, then why is this 17 year old girl from Palm Beach standing in Ghislain's apartment halfway around the world with Prince Andrew's arm around her waist? That's kinda weird. Well, Ghislain's answer has always been that it's a fake photo. Prince Andrew ran with the same line, which is probably the best that they can do seeing as there's no other possible explanation for its existence. But that photo has been extensively verified by forensic experts, by the photographer that originally broke the story, by a whole host of analysis. It's a real photo. Quote, the photograph also had a stamp that reads zero zero zero number one five thirteenth March o one, Walgreens one hour photo, which insinuates the picture was developed in a one hour service on 03/13/2001 at a branch of Walgreens. Quote, a Florida based photographic expert and court witness, Joel Van Hemmel, also said he had no doubt the photo was genuine when shown the back of the photo. It was definitely produced in a Walgreens for sure, probably using a Noritsu or Fuji machine. Prince Andrew paid an undisclosed number of millions of dollars to Virginia Dufry to avoid facing her in open court, and Ghislaine Maxwell herself paid Virginia her own undisclosed number of millions to settle a defamation suit that Virginia brought against her. But, yeah, you're supposed to believe a single word out of this lying demon's mouth. And it's not even about Trump. This is not about Trump. It's not I'm not claiming that this proves anything about the guy. This is way bigger than Trump. And if half the country can pretend like, oh, maybe Ghislain's a good guy. Maybe she's just telling the truth and wasn't even really doing all that much at all. And just because, like, you want Trump to be some paragon of angelic perfection is psychotic. Okay? It's retarded. Stop it. You're making your team look so fucking stupid. It's hard to look at. Epstein didn't kill himself. He didn't bank himself. He didn't employ himself. They are all in on it. They're all covering it up. They all deserve to face trial for their part in this crime against humanity and against America. And if Trump is just scared that there might be a little bit of backlash on him because of, like, implications from the thing, it's like, if Trump didn't do anything wrong, then fucking let it out, and we will forgive you for being friends with him back in the day, bro. But, like, whatever's going on now doesn't look like that. All these motherfuckers deserve to be tried, imprisoned, and maybe more. K? End of story. Except that that's not the end of the story. Because last week, we got renewed attention on a set of leaked emails that actually hit the Internet a couple of months ago, but they took some time to circulate and be verified and dug open. Over 100,000 emails to and from Ehud Barak are on the Internet and available for download. And I spent the last couple of days completely sidetracked by trying to find some way to get AI to help me organize and scrape through all of them to get a sense for what they actually contain. And I'm still just at the beginning of my analysis, but from what I've seen already, some very clear trends emerge. First off, the email trove only spans from 10/10/2014 to 09/09/2015. So that's an eleven month time period. And at least the dataset that I have is specifically from that time period. I believe that some of the reporting coming out about Peter Thiel's part in the emails is being done by people with access to other caches of emails because he's actually not in the main set that's going around. So I plan to dig more into why that's happening later this week. But in just this eleven month range, there are over 83 emails in the file between Jeffrey Epstein and Ehud Barak. Many of them are short, basically, you up boo. And many of them are asking to speak on the phone instead of over message because these guys weren't dumb. They knew that their correspondences might one day wind up in the hands of some asshole like me and get plastered all over the Internet. K? But it is readily apparent that these guys were working closely together on intelligence operations. Many of these emails are about organizing meetings with powerful individuals, gaining access, Many of them are about money and investments. One big one that's mentioned repeatedly throughout this batch of emails is Reporti, which is a cyber tech company, an Israeli cyber company that's now known as Carbine nine one one. It has been extensively reported on by Whitney Webb. This is an Israeli military intelligence cyber startup that Ehud and Epstein eventually wound up investing in alongside Peter Thiel's Founders Fund, who invested $15,000,000 in 2018. Jeffrey Epstein also invested $1,000,000 in the company as early as 2016 using a bunch of offshore shell companies set up by Ehud Barak to hide Epstein's involvement in the deal. Johnny Vedmore has done extensive reporting on Nicole Junkerman, who is at the center of this whole piece of the story, and we will probably report more on her and on it over the coming weeks. I also put up a video the other day about an online intelligence service that Ehud Barak was apparently subscribed to for at least $3,000 annually that sent him regular reports about powerful people of his choosing all around the world, and the pattern of those reports indicates that he was paying to keep tabs on the Clintons through Hillary's 2016 campaign, tech moguls like Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos, politicians like Vladimir Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu, as well as a bunch of other powerful people. There's a lot more to dig up in these email leaks, and I'll be publishing more about it as I dig deeper into them. There is a lot more going on, a lot of important stories that I just don't have time to give the coverage they deserve right now. Trump is going socialist and nationalizing part of Intel in a financial deal that I don't think we have the full story on yet, so I'm going to wait to report on it until we get more of the picture. The CDC is apparently in open revolt against Bobby Kennedy. Head of CDC, Susan Menaras, either resigned or was fired or was fired and then resigned or is refusing to resign. The reporting keeps on changing, and now a whole bunch of CDC staff are apparently walking out in a form of protest against Bobby. But behind the scenes, it seems like, as usual, it's just big industry interest throwing a temper tantrum that someone has the audacity to ask them if they've ever conducted any safety studies on any of the poisons that they are feeding to us and injecting into us. And it's all just evil, greedy men that don't want the gravy train to end from my perspective. I don't know. I'll keep my eyes on the story and maybe do a more thorough investigation into it in the coming weeks if it heats up. There were also a ton more stories out of and surrounding Israel over the last weeks from the demons double tapping a hospital. This article says four strikes, but it's because it was actually two double strikes, one and then, like, ten minutes later, the next. Then they tried to play possum on the PR apology tour as if they hadn't just done it intentionally to kill medical personnel and journalists. Israel's own statistics now show the civilian casualty rate at eighty three percent of all deaths in Gaza, which is so fucking insane. I don't even know where to start. I mean, anyone with eyes knows that that's what's been going on since October 7 and long before, and I would imagine that the number is actually low. And in the meantime, we've got Ron DeSantis launching a special Israel license plate in Florida. Beverly Hills actually voted to put up Israeli flags in all public school classrooms during the month of May to celebrate Jewish American Heritage Month. And the Internet was so outraged that now they appear to be backpedaling. W Internet. Fucking public schools. Come on. Like, you're damn straight. I'm so sick of every week having just story after story of Israeli war crimes and my country fucking its citizens dry for the betterment of genocidal ethno state that hates America. So all I'll say about Israel today is this. If you believe that the Jews and Israel are God's chosen people, please explain to me how that is any different than the ethnonationalist ideology of Nazi Germany. You have a race of people that say that they are the chosen race, and all other races are inferior, and they are committing heinous war crimes because of that ethnonationalist belief. Right? If the Jews are God's chosen people, what do you think that makes the rest of us? Think about it. Speaker 1: That would be enough to collapse the current paradigm and change the whole planet. Speaker 0: Anyways, that's our show for today. Thank you for tuning in and staying to the end. If you enjoyed it, please hit the like button, the subscribe button, and hit the notification bell so you don't miss the documentary that's dropping on my channel this week. Sorry that I missed you guys over the last two weeks. I was out in the woods, rolling around in the dirt underneath a log cabin, doing repairs, and getting some much needed family time. But I'm out of the woods. I'm in the DC area for the next month, and I've got some wicked things cooking. So expect to see a lot more from me from here on out, and keep your eyes peeled for some cool collaborations and documentaries coming out here soon. That's it for today. Remember to drink your water, do something kind for someone else, and tell someone that you love them. And we'll see you next time. Speaker 1: It's so sick that we can't talk. Our security is at stake.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript weaves together a compilation of statements and reporting surrounding the 9/11 attacks, Israeli involvement rumors, and related investigations. - Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly said September has been good for Israel, claiming, “we're benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon and the American struggle in Iraq.” - CNN reported (and later acknowledged as false) a tape in which Osama bin Laden told his mother that something big was about to happen; bin Laden had consistently denied involvement in 9/11 and claimed Zionists were behind the attacks. Reports from Japanese, Chinese, and Indian outlets claimed bin Laden was killed in Afghanistan in 2001 and buried in an unmarked grave by his own men. There are claims from the Muslim world and some European figures that Zionist extremists staged the 9/11 attacks to ignite terrorism. - A commentator asserted that the war has targeted Israel’s Muslim enemies and is being fought and paid for with American blood, lives, and tax dollars. - A speaker argued that bin Laden, regardless of who committed the attacks, comes back to the Middle East, and urged the United States to dismantle the entire “evil empire of terrorism,” warning that without doing so, the terror network could develop nuclear capabilities and threaten the United States and its allies. - Observers described a lack of apparent shock among certain people in connection with the events, noting unusual behavior or reactions. - Five men arrested in a van were later identified as Israeli, with some connections to Israeli intelligence; they were turned over to the FBI. National security databases showed some of the men had prior Israeli intelligence or counterterrorism experience, and one admitted serving in an Israeli army anti-terrorist unit and refused a lie detector test for an extended period. A speaker emphasized loyalty to country when discussing military service. - Fox News and others reported that up to 140 Israelis had been detained prior to September 11 in an ongoing, broad investigation into suspected espionage by Israelis in the United States. Government documents described hundreds of incidents across U.S. cities that investigators said could indicate organized intelligence gathering. The “country A” in a General Accounting Office document was said to be Israel, described as conducting aggressive espionage against the U.S. despite being an ally, with Israel possessing substantial resources to achieve its collection objectives. - Investigators questioned the possibility that some Israeli agents had advanced knowledge of the attacks, suggesting there is explosive but not necessarily conclusive evidence when aggregated. A recurring theme was the question of how such agents could have known, given the events. - Allegations of foreknowledge included claims that Israeli agents were forewarned and filmed the event on Israeli television. Some individuals detained or questioned described their presence in Israel as journalists or documenters. The broader question centered on whether Israelis gathered intelligence in advance and whether it was shared or withheld. - The transcript also recounts the failure to account for certain details (e.g., passport survivals, disappearance of voice recorders) as well as assertions that anthrax letters, later linked to a U.S. Army lab, were used to deflect blame toward Muslims. - Two accounts describe a white Chevy van linked to Urban Moving Systems, a moving company whose employees were alleged to have connections to Israeli intelligence. The FBI issued a nationwide alert about the van, and two suspects were reported in custody after explosives were found in a vehicle near the George Washington Bridge. CBS reported that two suspects were in FBI custody and that the truck contained enough explosives to damage the bridge, with some accounts noting a prior alert about a van on the way to destroy the bridge. - Overall, the material presents a network of claims and investigations involving alleged Israeli espionage, foreknowledge of 9/11, intelligence operations in the United States, and specific incidents surrounding the George Washington Bridge and related arrests.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv has reported Israel's former prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly said the September have been good for Israel. Netanyahu said, quote, we're benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon and the American struggle in Iraq. Speaker 1: One attacks, CNN reported that the US government had a tape recording of Osama bin Laden telling his mother that something big was about to happen and that she wouldn't be seeing him for a while. CNN later acknowledged that the report was false. Osama bin Laden consistently denied being involved in nine one one and claimed the Israeli Zionists were behind the attacks. According to Japanese, Chinese, and Indian news reports, Osama bin Laden was killed in Afghanistan in the 2001 and was buried in an unmarked grave by his own men. The Muslim world and millions of Europeans, including Germany's former minister of technology, Andreas von Bulow, believe that Zionist extremists staged the nine one one attacks on America to ignite terrorism. That war has targeted Israel's Muslim enemies and is being fought and paid for with the blood, the lives, and the tax dollars of terrorized American citizens. I Speaker 2: think that what is important is this. Bin Laden, well, whoever committed this, is not floating in the air. He comes back to the Middle East. He is not suspended in in space. He comes back to the territory of this terror empire. So I think what is required right now is for United The United States not merely to seek out the specific perpetrator here, but to go and dismantle the entire evil empire of terrorism. Because if we don't, what I wrote in 1995, well, it didn't come to fruition precisely in the way they didn't plant a nuclear bomb in the Twin Towers. They used a 350 ton conventional bomb. But these regimes that are part of this terror network are developing now nuclear weapons. If we don't dismantle this terror network in time, the regimes and the organizations that have absolutely no inhibition in destroying The United States and its allies, then what we will see is that one day their mad fantasies will bring about not tens of thousand or even 20,000 victims in The United States, but hundreds of thousands and millions. They are after our civilization. We must summon the forces of civilization and the force and the power to act against them now when we have the power and when we have we still have the time to do so. Speaker 3: You know, they they they were they didn't look shocked to me. You know, they didn't look shocked. I thought it was very strange. Speaker 4: The witness called police who stopped the van hours later and arrested five men. All five, it turns out, were Israeli. They were turned over to the FBI. Sources tell ABC News during a check of national security databases, some of the men were listed as having had connections with Israeli intelligence. At the FBI, that set off alarm bells. Speaker 5: The FBI wasn't satisfied. Channel four has learned from intelligence sources that some of the men's names were already known to American counterintelligence. Paul Kurtzberg admitted serving in an Israeli army anti terrorist unit. He refused to take a lie detector test for ten weeks. Speaker 3: I was serving in a special unit in the army, and it's not a big secret or something like that. But there are things that I have to keep to to myself as loyal to my country. Speaker 6: By Fox News indicate that even prior to September 11, as many as 140 other Israelis had been detained or arrested in a secretive and sprawling investigation into suspected espionage by Israelis in The United States. Investigators from numerous government agencies are part of a working group that's been compiling evidence since the mid nineties. These documents detail hundreds of incidents in cities and towns across the country that investigators say, quote, may well be an organized intelligence gathering activity. The first part of the investigation focuses on Israelis who say they are art students from the University of Jerusalem and Basal Al Academy. Documents say they, quote, targeted and penetrated military bases, the DEA, FBI, and dozens of other government facilities, and even secret offices and unlisted private homes of law enforcement and intelligence personnel. The majority of those questioned, quote, stated they served in military intelligence, electronic surveillance intercept, and or explosive ordinance units. Why would Israelis spy in and on The US? A general accounting office investigation referred to Israel as country a and said, quote, according to a US intelligence agency, the government of country a conducts the most aggressive espionage operation against The US of any US ally. The document concludes, quote, Israel possesses the resources and technical capability to achieve its collection objectives. Speaker 7: What about this question of advanced knowledge of what was gonna happen on 09/11? How clear are investigators that some Israeli agents may have known something? Speaker 6: Well, it's very explosive information, obviously, and there's a great deal of evidence that they say they have collected. None of it necessarily conclusive. It's more when they put it all together. Bigger question they say is, how could they not have known? Almost a direct quote, Brit. Speaker 1: How could Mohammed Ada's passport survive the fireball explosion that supposedly cremated him, fly out of his pocket, fly out of the incinerated plane, flutter to the ground in the two feet of debris, and end up in readable condition in the hands of investigators, all within forty eight hours. Why did 19 Muslim men even need passports on domestic flights? How were passports found but not the plane's voice recorders? Why did the hijackers need passports they would never use again after their suicide flights? And why were the 19 accused Muslims not under surveillance on nine one one if they were so easy to identify? The conspicuous trail of planted evidence continued three weeks after the nine one one attacks when anthrax letters killed five people and were clearly worded to throw the blame on Muslims. Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great. It has since been proven that the anthrax came from a US army lab and was never mailed by Muslims. There are no airport security videos of any of the 19 accused Muslims boarding any of the Speaker 4: high The FBI needed the answers to three important questions. Who were these men? What brought them to that parking lot on the morning of September 11? And did they have any advanced knowledge of what was going to happen that day? Speaker 8: This has been acknowledged on Israeli television that these, Israeli agents had foreknowledge. They admitted on Israeli television that they were forewarned and were told to go and film the event. Speaker 9: And we were taken for another round of questioning, this time related to our allegedly being members of Mossad. The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event. Our purpose was to document the event. Speaker 6: Investigators suspect that the Israelis may have gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance and not shared it. A highly placed investigator said there are, quote, tie ins. But when asked for details, he flatly refused to describe them saying, quote, evidence linking these Israelis to nine one one is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information. Asked this week about another sprawling investigation and the detention of 60 Israelis since September 11, Bush administration treated the questions like hot potatoes. Speaker 9: I would just refer you to Department of Justice with it. I'm not familiar with the report. Speaker 10: I'm aware that, some Israeli citizens have been detained. With respect to why they are being retained detained and the other aspects of of your question, whether it's because they are in intelligence services or what they were doing, I will, defer to the Department of Justice and the FBI to answer that. Speaker 6: Beyond the 60 apprehended or detained and many deported since September 11, another group of a 140 Israeli individuals have been arrested and detained in this year in what government documents describe as, quote, an organized intelligence gathering operation designed to, quote, penetrate government facilities. Most of those individuals said they had served in the Israeli military, which is compulsory there, but they also had, most of them, intelligence expertise and either worked for Amdocs or other companies in Israel that specialize in wiretapping. Earlier this week, the Israeli embassy here in Washington denied any spying against or in The United States. Speaker 7: Carl, what about this question of advanced knowledge of what was gonna happen on nine eleven? How clear are investigators that some Israeli agents may have known something? Speaker 6: Well, it's very explosive information, obviously, and there's a great deal of evidence that they say they have collected, none of it necessarily conclusive. It's more when they put it all together. A bigger question they say is, how could they not have known? Almost a direct quote, Brent. Speaker 8: So this is not disputable. They were amongst the other Israelis who were arrested on 09/11, some of whom were caught in vans with explosives Speaker 10: in Speaker 8: the vans. Speaker 10: George Washington Bridge. Speaker 8: Indeed. George Washington Bridge. And they're not the there were more than one set of Israelis that were actually caught with explosives in their vehicles. Speaker 11: And nationally, they're looking for a white Chevy van with New Jersey plates, and on the back bumper, it says something to the effect of urban moving system. Speaker 12: We had received an all points bulletin and I just happened to see the van, you know, hollered over to my lieutenant. You know, I think that could be the van. We checked it out and it was. You know, we were all on edge, obviously. So I really wasn't looking to make friends with these people, and neither were the officers that I were with. Once we started talking to them, you know, they were pretty much like, hey. You know, we're, you know, we're not against you. We're with you. Speaker 13: They were indeed from The Middle East, but more precisely from Israel. Two of them were formerly identified as Mossad agents. The five officially worked for a moving company called Urban Moving Systems, whose owner, a certain Dominique Otto Suter, fled to Tel Aviv on September 14 and was never investigated. Speaker 4: Not long after the arrest, the offices of Urban Moving were simply abandoned. Almost everything was left behind. Speaker 5: Tuval Aviv is a counterterrorism adviser to the US Congress, but was once a spy for Israel's secret service Mossad. He says Urban Moving was a front company for Israeli intelligence and that some of its workers were spying illegally in The US. Speaker 14: Israel has engaged in intelligence gathering in friendly countries. Some of it is done with permission, and some of it probably has been done without permission in areas that is vital to Israeli interest. Speaker 15: There was a bolo, which is be on the lookout for a particular van with there's supposed to be a few occupants in there, and the bolo basically stated that this van may be on its way to destroy the George Washington Bridge or something like that, if I remember correctly, blow up the bridge. Speaker 16: The FBI has now put out a nationwide APB all points bulletin for a white Chevy van with New Jersey registration. Written on the back is Urban Moving Systems. Speaker 17: Two or three men arrested on the New Jersey Parkway. Deborah, can Speaker 15: you hear me now? Speaker 18: Yes. I can. That is the information that I'm getting from two sources that there was a van either on the New Jersey Turnpike or the Garden State Parkway and that it was near the George Washington Bridge. There were two or three men who were in the van. The van was pulled over. It is not clear why the van was pulled over, but when it was, law enforcers found, tons of explosives inside of the van. Speaker 19: But some very intelligent and aggressive cops also stopped another terrorist attack from happening on the George Washington Bridge. CBS two has learned exclusively that two men are in custody tonight after being arrested at the George Washington Bridge with an entire truckload of explosives. Now I'm told that those explosives could have been enough to blow up the entire span and all the cars and the people that were on it. Speaker 17: And word late tonight that two suspects are in FBI custody after a truckload of explosives was discovered around the George Washington Bridge. That bridge, links, New York to New Jersey over the Hudson River. Whether the discovery of those explosives has anything to do with other events today is unclear, but the FBI has two suspects in hand, said the truck, load of explosives enough explosives were in the truck to do great damage to the George Washington Bridge.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The Origin of Terror (DEEP THREAD)🧵 1. Al-Qaeda Origin: Late 1970s–1980s, Soviet-Afghan War U.S. Responsibility: The CIA's Operation Cyclone was a covert program initiated in 1979 to arm and finance Afghan mujahideen fighters during the Soviet-Afghan War. This operation, one of the longest and most expensive in CIA history, involved the provision of weapons, training, and financial support to Afghan resistance groups through Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). The program's primary objective was to counter Soviet influence in the region. However, it inadvertently laid the groundwork for the rise of Al-Qaeda. The influx of foreign fighters, including Osama bin Laden, and the establishment of training camps created a fertile environment for the development of transnational jihadist networks. These networks eventually coalesced into Al-Qaeda, which turned against its former benefactors, executing attacks such as the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States. Outcome: Al-Qaeda, originally a logistical network for Afghan jihadists, evolved into a global terrorist organization, orchestrating numerous attacks against U.S. and Western targets. Their motivation? ▫️U.S. Military Presence in the Middle East: American troops were stationed in Saudi Arabia, home to Islam’s two holiest sites (Mecca and Medina), after the Gulf War (1990–1991). This was viewed as an occupation of sacred land and directly fueled outrage among Islamist groups. ▫️Support for Israel: The U.S. provided political, military, and financial support to Israel, backing policies that oppressed and displaced Palestinians. This made the U.S. a legitimate target in the eyes of Al-Qaeda. ▫️Sanctions and Military Interventions in Muslim Countries: U.S.-led sanctions and military interventions in Iraq during the 1990s caused massive civilian suffering, which Al-Qaeda cited as direct evidence of Western hostility toward Muslims. ▫️Support for Authoritarian Middle Eastern Governments: The U.S. backed regimes in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Pakistan that actively repressed Islamic movements and populations, effectively making the U.S. complicit in the oppression of Muslims. ▫️Ideological and Religious Motivation: Al-Qaeda framed the attacks as defensive jihad — a religious duty to respond to Western aggression against Muslim populations. The U.S. was considered the “far enemy,” the main source of the oppression they were defending against. ▫️Retaliation for Prior U.S. Actions: Past U.S. interventions, including drone strikes, support for Mujahideen-turned-state adversaries, and sanctions, were treated as direct attacks on Muslims. The 9/11 attacks were a form of retribution for these policies. Wikipedia: https: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://www.trtworld.com/article/12727769

TRT World - Two American billionaires and their shady deals with Israeli intelligence Sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and mercenary Erik Prince enjoy strong ties to the Israeli intelligence industry, while cutting sensitive business deals with Russia, China and the US trtworld.com

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Here's the ADL saying that implicating Chertoff in a 9/11 coverup is anti semitic. https://www.adl.org/resources/news/911-anti-semitic-conspiracy-theories-still-abound

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Here's the grandson of and ADL board member posing as Al Qaeda to scare Americans into supporting israel's endless war, embezzlement, infiltration scheme.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Adam Gagan, billed as the American Al Qaeda and the media maven for Al Qaeda who helped produce many Al Qaeda videos on the Internet to make Al Qaeda look bad and to influence Muslims, is revealed to have the real name Adam Pearlman. He is described as Jewish and the grandson of a member of the board of the Anti Defamation League. The speaker notes that following the ADL’s history shows involvement in covertly supporting various American Nazi movements, mentioning a scandal from around World War II involving the head of the American Nazi party. The narrative continues that Adam Pearlman went around proclaiming, “I’m Al Qaeda, I’m Al Qaeda,” alleging turbans and portraying himself as a terrible Muslim to incite fear. He is said to be mocked once his true identity was uncovered. The presenters then introduce a replacement labeled Yosef Al Qatab, described as a frightening new American Al Qaeda figure, with a photo of him holding guns and knives, dressed like a Rambo and scowling at the camera. It is claimed he supposedly has a website featuring images such as the Statue Of Liberty with an axe buried in the back of the head, and that there is a link to a puppet show mocking Danny Pearl’s beheading, which is described as an uproar and appearing more like a movie prop than reality. The assertion is made that this is another fake. The person behind Yosef Al Qatab is named Joseph Cohen, a 39-year-old New York City taxi driver. He allegedly called himself Yousef Al Qaddab, but was born Joseph Cohen in America, and is described as Jewish. The speaker contends he is another manufactured front meant to convince Americans that Al Qaeda is present in the United States. This is used to justify surveillance on American citizens—reading emails and listening to phone calls—on the premise that they may encounter American Al Qaeda, which the speaker claims is a fabrication designed to create an enemy that does not actually exist. According to the speaker, the purpose is to rationalize totalitarian measures against the American people and to push for war against Muslims, claiming they are infiltrating America, ripping tags off couch cushions, and causing global warming. The overall framing is that the entire situation is war propaganda and nonsense intended to manufacture fear and justify aggression.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Adam Gagan, the so called American Al Qaeda who proclaimed himself the media maven, if you will, for Al Qaeda and was helping to produce a lot of these so called Al Qaeda videos that were all over the Internet that made Al Qaeda look really bad and made the Muslims look bad. Should you fail to comply in full, we will deem it sufficient justification to continue to fight and kill Americans. Come to find out, Adam Gaddon's real name was Adam Pearlman. And not only was he in fact Jewish, he was the grandson of a member of the board of the Anti Defamation League. And if you've been following the history of the Anti Defamation League, you will find out they've been very involved in covertly supporting a lot of these so called American Nazi movements. In fact, all the way back just about the time of World War II, there was this scandal where the head of the American Nazi their faces. So So anyway, anyway, we we have have Adam Perelman and he's been going around saying, I'm Al Qaeda, I'm Al Qaeda. See, I've a turban on my head. I'm a terrible Muslim. Got to hate me, got to be afraid of me. And of course, everybody's laughing at him now because we all know who he is. Okay. So they have brought in the understudy, and there is a new American Al Qaeda named Yosef Al Qatab. Oh, big scary name, and they've got a picture of him out there where he's holding all these guns and knives, and he's dressed up like a wannabe Rambo and he's scowling at the camera and he supposedly has this website with things in it like pictures of the Statue Of Liberty with an axe buried in the back of the head. I mean, very heavy handed, very over the top. There was also a link to a puppet show mocking Danny Pearl's beheading. Take a look. Oh, that's an uproar. You know, just looking more like a a movie prop than than anything else here. So as it turns out, this is another fake. His real name is Joseph Cohen. He's a 39 year old New York City taxi driver as you mentioned. He he called himself Yousef Al Qaddab, but he was born Joseph Cohen here in America. He is a Jew. And he is another manufactured front to try and convince Americans that Al Qaeda is actually here in The United States. This is why we've got to be doing this, doing surveillance on the American people and reading their email, listening to their phone calls and all this stuff because you never know when we're gonna get into a situation with the American Al Qaeda. And it's all a front. It's a fake. He's up there. He's he's there to try and create an enemy that doesn't really exist in order to justify the totalitarian treatment of the American people and to encourage us to go and attack them before they kill us. They're already here on the home front. We've got to go bomb those darn, those gosh darn Muslims because they're infiltrating America and they're ripping tags off of couch cushions and they're causing global warming and we've got to go into it's nonsense. It's all war propaganda.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Here's the reason the ADL was started in the first place. Specifically to petition for the release of Leo Frank.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that in newspaper articles about Leo Frank, there is no mention of his Jewish identity, and no antisemitism at his trial. The only time antisemitism reportedly surfaced was from Leo Frank’s mother, who, on 08/14/1913, told the solicitor, “neither do you, you Gentile dog.” The incident is described as occurring in the Atlanta Constitution, after which she was kicked out of the court.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Not one time in those newspaper articles is it ever mentioned that Leo Frank is Jewish. There was no antisemitism at his trial. None at all. The one time it did come out was from his mother on 08/14/1913, the Atlanta Constitution. She gets up and shouts at the solicitor, and neither do you, you Gentile dog. And that's when it came out, and they had to kick her out of court.
Video Transcript AI Summary
On 04/26/1913, in Atlanta, 13-year-old Mary Fagan, recently laid off from the National Pencil Company where Leo Frank, a 29-year-old Jewish superintendent of German descent, was in charge, went to collect her pay. The next morning, night watchman Newt Lee found Mary’s brutally beaten body in the factory basement, with a cord around her neck and autopsy revealing she had been raped. Beside the corpse were two notes describing her murderer, a long tall black man called the Night Witch, written as if Mary herself were jotting them in her final moments. The black night watchman who discovered the body was initially treated as a suspect, including an attempted coerced confession, but no confession emerged. Two main suspects remained: Jim Conley, the factory’s black janitor, who was paid more than white child laborers and granted special privileges, and Leo Frank, the last to claim to have seen Mary alive. Conley was seen washing red stains from his shirt at the factory, later determined to be rust; Frank had hired a top defense team to prove his innocence as the murder trial drew national attention. The case intensified when Conley admitted he wasn’t illiterate as he had claimed and swore that Frank paid him to write the murder notes, framing Conley as an accomplice with Frank as the main suspect. Frank’s accounts about what happened after Mary left his office changed over time, including an alleged unconscious bathroom break that would have placed him near the metal room at the suspected time. A young worker testified that she went to Frank’s office right after Mary left and found Frank not there; several female witnesses portrayed Frank as a lewd man with a penchant for young girls. After a drawn-out trial, a grand jury, which included Jewish members, unanimously found Frank guilty. He was sentenced to death by hanging, to be carried out that October, but after unsuccessful appeals up to the federal level, Governor Slaton commuted the sentence to life in prison. Public anger surged, with accusations of corruption and conflicts of interest in the justice system. In 1915, about 25 men calling themselves the Knights of Mary Fagan kidnapped and lynched Leo Frank in Marietta, Georgia. Meanwhile, Bene B’rith (Bene Berith) had already faced public accusations of espionage during the Civil War and had connections to Confederate and Freemason circles; after Frank’s conviction, the organization allegedly emphasized Conley’s testimony. The ADL (Anti-Defamation League), formed that same year, claimed to defend Jewish people and combat anti-Semitism, while later campaigns elevated Frank’s innocence. In 1982, Alonzo Mann, then an elderly former office boy who had lied in 1913, corrected his testimony, saying he witnessed Conley carrying Mary’s body and was threatened if he spoke. This renewed ADL efforts to seek a pardon for Frank. Frank was posthumously pardoned in 1986, but not absolved; the ADL continues to advocate for exoneration, aided by attorney Roy Barnes, a Freemason and former Georgia governor. The narrative frames Leo Frank’s guilt as contested, with ongoing debate about anti-Semitism, justice, and historical memory. The video invites viewers to consult sources and form their own conclusions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like a phoenix from the ashes of Sherman's march to the sea, Atlanta sprung forth as the gateway to the New South, attracting a diverse array of businesses and workers to Georgia's capital. One of these workers was former farm girl, 13 year old Mary Fagan, who had recently been laid off at the National Pencil Company. Then managed by 29 year old Superintendent Leo Frank, a man of German descent, who grew up in New York, eventually graduating from Cornell University, and traveled throughout Europe to learn the ways of business. Though he journeyed south only a few years prior to implement his European lessons, Frank made fast friends within his community, becoming president of the Atlanta chapter of Bene B'rith, which is much like a Masonic society but strictly for Jewish folks, that was created in New York after the American Revolution. On Saturday, 04/26/1913, on the day of what was once celebrated as Confederate Memorial Day, little Mary Fagan entered the office of her boss, Leo Frank, to collect her pay of a dollar and 20¢. Frank would be the last known person to see Mary alive. The next day, in the wee hours of morning, Newt Lee, the night watchman discovered a horrible scene in the basement of the factory where Mary's brutally beaten body was left atop of a flurry of pencil shavings with a cord cinched around her neck. Her autopsy later revealing she'd been raped. And beside her corpse were two notes describing her murderer, a long tall black man called the Night Witch. Written through Mary's perspective as though she jotted it down during her final moments. The black night watchman who discovered Mary's body was immediately brought into the police station as a suspect. And police wasted no time in attempting to get a confession out of him, Even going as far as firing off a gun next to his head during the interrogation. But that confession never came. More suspects were arrested as pressure mounted to find Mary's killer. But eventually, only two suspects remained. The first was Jim Conley, the pencil factory's black janitor, who held the lowest status job at the factory but was paid 50% more than white child laborers and held special privilege of never having to punch the clock as granted by Frank. He was seen washing red stains out of his shirt at the factory, which police later determined to be rust. And the second suspect was Leo Frank, the last person to admit seeing Mary alive. Frank quickly hired the best defense team money could buy to prove his innocence in the murder trial that made front page headlines that entire summer. In the courtroom and beyond, lies were told, stories rehashed, true character revealed, and bribes offered. The case began to heat up after Conley admitted that he wasn't illiterate like he originally claimed. And in fact, he swore that Leo Frank paid him to write the murder notes, framing Conley's entire involvement as an accomplice in the murder of Mary Fagan, with Leo Frank as the main suspect. Refusing to be cross examined unlike the other suspects, Frank's story began to unravel as his accounts of what occurred after Mary left his office started to change with each recollection. Originally, Frank swore that he stayed in his office following Mary's departure after receiving her pay envelope. But later, Frank stated he might have taken an unconscious bathroom break that would have placed him walking past the metal room, the site where Mary was believed to have been murdered and at the suspected time when the attack occurred. Another young worker was called to the witness stand claiming that she had gone to Frank's office right after Mary left and Frank wasn't there. She even waited around for a bit but concluded that Frank had gone home for the day. The character witnesses included a string of female employees who all had the same thing to say about Frank. He was a touchy, leery pervert with a penchant for young girls. So after a drawn out trial that garnered immense attention, and claims from the prosecution that alleged bribery and witness tampering from Frank's legal team, the grand jury reached a unanimous verdict. A grand jury which, by the way, included Jewish members. They'd all decided that Leo Frank was guilty. After being convicted of murder, the judge sentenced Frank to death by hanging, which was set to be carried out that October. But after Frank's legal team attempted several failed appeals all the way up to the federal level, attorney and Georgia governor Slaton eventually had Frank's sentence reduced to life in prison. The public response was one of anger as they believed the justice system had failed the real victim, Mary Fagan, because of under the table deals and conflicts of interest. Given that Governor Slaton was a partner at the law firm of Frank's defense, on 08/16/1915, a group of about 25 men who called themselves the Knights of Mary Fagan kidnapped Frank from prison and lynched him in Marietta, Georgia, his body facing the direction of the Fagan residence. Though they described themselves as a benevolent organization, by the time Mary Fagan's corpse was six feet under Georgia Clay, Bene Bereth had already been publicly accused of espionage during the Civil War, implicated in the assassination of President Lincoln, with the goal of subverting and fragmenting America so that it could once again fall under the British crown, as documented by both Gentile and Jewish scholars alike. During the Civil War, agents of Bene Bryth even worked in cahoots with Confederate General and Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite's southern jurisdiction, the infamous Freemason known as Albert Pike. It was reported that after Leo Frank was found guilty and convicted of murder, he was once again re elected as President of Bene Bourith's Atlanta chapter, whose members were adamant in perpetuating the narrative that Frank's fate relied heavily on Conley's testimony. The testimony of a proven liar and second class citizen in the post civil war south. And Bene Bourith even went as far as inscribing in stone that everyone in the courtroom during that sweltering Southern summer, aside from Frank and his defense team, was either bribed, threatened, or fell under one all encompassing term, an anti Semi. The same year the Federal Reserve System was created and Americans began paying federal income tax. Leo Frank was convicted of murder. And as a result, Bene Brieff created the Anti Defamation League, what would serve as the public relations arm of their benevolent organization. With its original mission statement to stop by appeals to reason and conscience, and if necessary, by appeals to law, the defamation of the Jewish people. As the years watered down the public awareness of the Leo Frank trial, the ADL ramped up their campaign to paint Frank as an innocent man and victim of anti Semitism. Their efforts stretched across various platforms, docuseries, college curriculums, and music theater productions. One retelling of Frank's story portrayed 13 year old Mary Fagan as a temptress who all but enjoyed being sexually abused by older men. The ADL highlighted racial tensions in the South during that time, but conveniently left out crucial evidence in key witness accounts that ultimately resulted in Frank's conviction. Even in her last will and testament, Frank's Jewish wife stated that she didn't want to be buried next to him. Was she also practicing antisemitism? The ADL has never been shy about their objective. Unless they could obtain an official pardon for Leo Frank from The United States legal system, it very much appeared that the organization was created to protect a pedophile murderer who managed a sweatshop full of children. In 1982, it seemed like the ADL would get exactly what they wanted when Alonzo Mann, in his old age, came forward with a statement. He'd lied in 1913 during his sworn testimony. He corrected the record saying that on 04/26/1913, when he was a 14 year old office boy at the National Pencil Company, He witnessed Jim Conley carrying the body of Mary Fagan. And when Conley realized he'd been caught, he threatened Mann's life, saying that if he told anyone, he'd kill him. So sixty seven years after Frank was lynched, man came clean, which started the process of the ADL petitioning for a pardon. But what the ADL considered a bombshell only confirmed Conley's testimony. He was an accomplice to the murder. An appeal to tribalism would have you believe that an innocent man was lynched for a crime he didn't commit because of anti Semitism. An appeal to common sense leads you in a different direction. Mary Fagan obviously didn't write her own murder notes. So, if Jim Conley was really the one guilty of homicide, then why would he implicate himself in the notes? Isn't it more logical to consider that Conley was probably paid by the real murderer to write those notes in the aftermath of Mary's death, assuring Conley that the physical description of a long, tall, black night witch would fit the physical description of Newt Lee, who they both knew would be the one to discover Mary's body the following morning. Pair that common sense explanation with forensic and circumstantial evidence, character witnesses, and the ever changing personal testimony that eventually planted Leo Frank at the scene of the crime at the time of Mary's death, and that's how a unanimous guilty verdict was reached. The ADL has been praised for their efforts to protect individuals and groups from bias, discrimination, and hate, which has landed the ADL's education materials in the curriculums of public schools, granted them the opportunity to provide training within the police system, and given them sway in the boardrooms of media conglomerates and leading technology monopolies, like Google, YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook. The scope of their influence cannot be understated. On the flip side, criticism of the ADL involves them being an anti gentile pro Israel group masquerading as a progressive civil rights organization, which promotes The Us versus them narrative that once only consisted of gentile versus Jew, but has now expanded to men versus women, black versus white, straight versus gay, pretty much any divisive agenda imaginable. The ADL champions. Then labels any criticism against the group they claim to protect as hate speech. But the ADL doesn't really protect these groups. It harms them. It exploits them. It teaches them to view themselves as victims of a hostile world. Without victimhood, without racial provocation, the ADL has no need to exist. So how much of the hatred is real and how much is manufactured? This criticism along with that line of questioning is labeled, you guessed it, antisemitism. While Frank was posthumously pardoned in 1986, he was not absolved. Over a hundred years after the death of Mary Fagan and the ADL is still trying to get Frank exonerated, but this time they have the help of Freemason attorney and former Georgia governor Roy Barnes, who has outspokenly advocated for the case to be re examined. Not much has changed, has it? And who benefits from this pardon? Not Mary Fagan, and not Leo Frank. I don't know if you've noticed, but they're both very dead. However, it does benefit the ADL. They have become the thing they claim to hate. A Stasi like entity that seeks not only to censor speech, but thought as well. Leo Frank's pardon, in a way, brings legitimacy to their creation and endorses their efforts. Today, we find ourselves stuck between yesterday and tomorrow, sandwiched between the corpses of Mary Fagan and Leo Frank, in a coffin so subtle that most of us don't realize we're lying there, remaining silent when we should say something. Most people are good people, just doing the best they can regardless of their race, gender, or belief system. They are subject to programming and manipulation. Their bodies succumb to illness. They want the best for their families, like me and you. It is only a sliver of a percentage of individuals who commit acts of evil. They are not honest about who they are, and instead, they construct illusions to shield themselves from jagged truths that bleed out of a past once buried. And that is the crux of the matter. So Internet friends, Leo Frank, still guilty after all this time? This video is highly sourced with materials from both sides of the argument, so please take a look at the top pinned comment with my source list if you wish to reach your own conclusion. As always, you know I look forward to reading your comments. Thank you so much for watching, subscribing, and supporting my channel.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The Architect of the Security State: Michael Chertoff's Zionist Roots The appointment of Michael Chertoff as the second Secretary of Homeland Security was not a matter of political happenstance. It was the strategic placement of an individual with deep, multi-generational ties to zionist ideology and Israeli intelligence interests. An examination of his background reveals a clear and undeniable pattern. VIDEO:A chief architect of 9-11, Ehud Barak, interviewed on BBC an hour after 9-11 attacks Yasser Arafat Giving his condolences for 9-11

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://www.wired.com/2008/08/chertoff/ https://mintpressnews.cn/cia-israel-mossad-jeffrey-epstein-orwellian-nightmare/261692/

Chertoff: I'm Listening to the Internet (Not in a Bad Way) Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff sat down with Threat Level on Monday in Silicon Valley to talk about laptop searches at the border, the government’s new-found interest in computer security, and the continuing saga of overeager terrorist watch lists. Among the revelations: It seems blog comments inspired him to propose a laptop-tracking application for those \[…\] wired.com
How the CIA, Mossad and “the Epstein Network” are Exploiting Mass Shootings to Create an Orwellian Nightmare Israel's Mossad and infamous Unit 8200 are partnering with the CIA and US tech firms to create an Orwellian pre-crime nightmare. mintpressnews.cn

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Paternal Link to Zionist Activism: His father, Rabbi Gershon Chertoff, was a prominent Talmudic scholar and a committed Zionist activist. This background placed Michael Chertoff within an ideological and social framework dedicated to advancing Zionist goals from a young age, providing him with the network and ideological foundation for his future role.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Maternal Link to Israeli Intelligence: Chertoff's mother, Livia Eisen, was a Polish-born israeli citizen and one of the first flight attendants for El Al Airlines. It is a well-documented fact that El Al has historically served as a front for israeli intelligence operations. Furthermore, she was a direct participant in "Operation Magic Carpet," a covert Mossad-led mission in 1948 to airlift Yemenite jews to israel. Her involvement points to a functional role within israel's intelligence apparatus.

Video Transcript AI Summary
El Al. It's not just an airline. It's Israel. El Al. It's not just an airline. The spy cables confirm it after years of allegations that El Al functions as Israel's front for its intelligence agencies. In 2009, South African TV show Carte Blanche broadcast claims by a former airline guard at Johannesburg Airport, who said he was working for Shin Bet, Israel's internal spy agency. "We pull the wool over everyone's eyes. We do exactly what we want. The local authorities do not know what we are doing." Months later, South Africa deported an Israeli airline official. While little detail was released, secret intelligence documents confirm Garb's story. They carried firearms and had, according to them, diplomatic protection, and they had all access unrestricted at the airport, giving them the advantage to gather information with regards to arrivals and departures to and from South Africa. Another classified report says El Al has the privilege of not being searched at the restricted areas. El Al officials are also allowed to travel freely with their weapons amongst the El Al passengers. One of the members of El Al has also been identified as a courier for the Mossad. The broadcast triggered a meeting at South Africa's foreign ministry. Security representatives withdrew permission for the Israelis to carry weapons. Then, despite arguments, they also took away the El Al workers' diplomatic immunity. A separate document relates counterintelligence information the South Africans have gathered. It says the El Al manager at Johannesburg International Airport is very involved in the gathering of intelligence and handled the issue of a pipe bomb at an Israeli company in 2001. El Al refused numerous attempts by Al Jazeera to seek comment. The Carte Blanche broadcast also got other intelligence agencies worried. Canadian spies contacted South Africa and asked for details on how Shin Bet was using El Al, not just as an airline, but also as a front. Clayton Swisher, Al Jazeera.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: El Al. It's not just an airline. It's Israel. El Al. It's not just an airline. It's Israel's front for its intelligence agencies, and the spy cables confirm it after years of allegations. In 2009, South African TV show, carte blanche broadcast the claims of a former airline guard at Johannesburg Airport. He said he was working for Shin Bet, Israel's internal spy Speaker 1: agency. We pull the wool over everyone's eyes. We do exactly what we want. The local authorities do not know what we are doing. Speaker 0: Months later, South Africa deported an Israeli airline official. Little more detail was released, but secret intelligence document confirms Garb's story. Speaker 2: They did carry firearms and had, according to them, diplomatic protection. They even had all access unrestricted at the airport. This gave them the advantage to gather information with regards to arrivals and departures to and from South Africa. Speaker 0: Another classified report says El Al has the privilege of not being searched at the restricted areas. Speaker 2: El Al officials are also allowed to travel freely with their weapons amongst the El Al passengers. One of the members of El Al has also been identified as a courier for the Mossad. Speaker 0: The broadcast triggered a meeting at South Africa's foreign ministry. Security representatives withdrew permission for the Israelis to carry weapons. Then, despite arguments, they also took away the El Al workers' diplomatic immunity. A separate document relates counterintelligence information the South Africans have gathered. It says the El Al manager at Johannesburg International Airport is very involved in the gathering of intelligence and handled the issue of a pipe bomb at an Israeli company in 2001. El Al refused numerous attempts by Al Jazeera to seek comment. The carte blanche broadcast also got other intelligence agencies worried. Canadian spies contacted South Africa and asked for details on how Shin Bet was using El Al, not just as an airline, but also as a front. Clayton Swisher, Al Jazeera.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Implementation of the Agenda: Chertoff's career path culminated in actions that directly benefited the israeli security industry. As Assistant Attorney General, he was a key architect of the USA PATRIOT Act. As Secretary of Homeland Security, he systematically prioritized and integrated israeli security firms and surveillance technologies into the core of America's domestic security infrastructure. These are not disparate facts; they form a direct line from Israeli intelligence operations and Zionist activism to the highest levels of the U.S. security state. Chertoff's background is not incidental to his career—it is central to understanding the agenda he implemented at the Department of Homeland Security.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Israeli Infiltration into U.S. Homeland Security Recent investigations have raised red flags about Israeli infiltration into United States governmental systems, particularly within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its sub-agency Immigration and Customs Enforcement

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The Infiltration: Armed with Harvard credentials, Chertoff slipped into the highest echelons of U.S. law enforcement. He clerked for a Supreme Court Justice and made his name as a federal prosecutor under Rudy Giuliani, taking on Mafia cases in New York. (How convenient.) In 1990, President Bush Sr. appointed him U.S. Attorney for New Jersey – and notably, the incoming Clinton administration in 1993 kept Chertoff in place at a Democrat’s request, an almost unheard-of favor. By the mid-90s he was the GOP’s go-to attack dog: Chertoff served as special counsel to the Senate Whitewater Committee, digging for dirt on the Clintons. He also advised George W. Bush’s 2000 campaign on crime policy. The payoff? Bush installed Chertoff as Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division in 2001. By sheer “coincidence,” this israeli-raised lawyer was now positioned at the nerve center of DOJ on 9/11, overseeing all federal criminal investigations. The fox was in the henhouse.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

John Ashcroft - US AG - Christian Zionist

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The Cover-Up: Immediately after 9/11, Chertoff wielded his power to quash investigations involving israeli suspects. As head of DOJ’s Criminal Division, he oversaw the fate of over 200 israelis detained in the United States in 2001 – ostensibly on immigration violations, but in fact for suspicious behavior before and after the attacks. These weren’t hapless tourists; according to a DEA report, many of the detained israelis had recently served in israeli military intelligence or explosive ordnance units – quite the coincidence. (Antiwar .com’s Justin Raimondo quipped that they must be graduates of the “Mossad School of Art” posing as itinerant art students.) Yet none of these Mossad-linked operatives saw a courtroom. Chertoff quietly sent them back to israel, deported on visa technicalities, effectively shutting down U.S. inquiries into an israeli spy ring trailing the 9/11 plot. Among those released were the infamous “High-Fivers” – five israeli agents caught celebrating as the Twin Towers burned – who later admitted on israeli TV that they were “documenting the event.” Chertoff’s “see no israeli evil” approach ensured no inconvenient truths derailed the rush to blame solely arab culprits.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The PATRIOT Deception: With the 9/11 smokescreen in place, Chertoff moved to ram through a pre-written police state blueprint. A mere 45 days after the attacks, the 342-page USA PATRIOT Act was signed into law – a draconian charter of domestic surveillance and executive power. It didn’t write itself; it was co-authored by Michael Chertoff while he was at DOJ. Think about that: the most sweeping erosion of Americans’ freedoms in generations was hustled through under the guise of “protecting freedom.” (Chertoff must be a very fast writer – or had the draft in his drawer all along.) Warrantless wiretaps, bulk data dragnets, secret detentions – this was the legal architecture of an Israeli-style security regime transplanted onto U.S. soil. Chertoff, raised on the Shin Bet model of treating a whole population as the enemy, helped transform America into a mirror of Israel’s occupied territories, with all of us as potential suspects. Little wonder that ardent Zionists like Senator Chuck Schumer and Israel-obsessed neocons cheered the Patriot Act on. It was the cornerstone in their project to turn the U.S. into an Islamophobic police state.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The Takeover: In February 2005, with enthusiastic backing from Senators Joe Lieberman and Chuck Schumer, Chertoff was confirmed as the 2nd Secretary of Homeland Security without a single dissenting. The Washington establishment didn’t even blink at Chertoff’s foreign pedigree – his israeli mother, his family ties – after all, Lieberman (who calls himself “israel’s guardian” in the Senate) was sponsoring this fox for the henhouse. Notably, the very concept of a “Department of Homeland Security” had been concocted by Lieberman and zionist Republican Arlen Specter immediately after 9/11. Now their like-minded friend Chertoff stepped in to wield this new super-agency as a weapon. He wasted no time continuing to interconnect US security to israel and mold the DHS in israel’s image. Chertoff redefined DHS strategy to mirror the tactics of israel’s internal security apparatus – mass surveillance, ethnic/religious profiling, militarized borders, and “zero tolerance” for dissent. Under Chertoff, DHS zealously focused on the “islamist threat” (conveniently aligning with israel’s favorite bogeyman) while forging unprecedented ties with israeli security services. The U.S. Homeland Security Department was about to become an outpost of the israeli security state.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 calls for everyone to work together to extract the hateful poison of anti-Semitism from the world, stating that this was “an anti Semitic attack at its worst” and that the scourge cannot be ignored, tolerated, or allowed to continue; it must be confronted and condemned everywhere. The speaker says we must stand with Jewish brothers and sisters to defeat anti-Semitism and vanquish the forces of hate, noting that “the Jews have endured terrible persecution” through the centuries and that “they've gone through a lot.” Those seeking destruction of the Jews are met with the assertion, “we will seek their destruction.” Regarding crimes like this, the speaker advocates bringing back the death penalty, declaring, “They have to pay the ultimate price.” The message concludes with “They can't do this to our country. We must draw a line in the sand and say very strongly, never again.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It will require all of us working together to extract the hateful poison of anti Semitism from our world. This was an anti Semitic attack at its worst. The scourge of anti Semitism cannot be ignored, cannot be tolerated, and it cannot be allowed to continue. We can't allow it to continue. It must be confronted and condemned everywhere. It rears its very ugly head. We must stand with our Jewish brothers and sisters to defeat anti Semitism and vanquish the forces of hate. That's what it is. Through the centuries, the Jews have endured terrible persecution, and you know that. We've all read it. We've studied it. They've gone through a lot. And those seeking their destruction, we will seek their destruction. And when you have crimes like this, whether it's this one or another one on another group, we have to bring back the death penalty. They have to pay the ultimate price. They have to pay the ultimate price. They can't do this. They can't do this to our country. We must draw a line in the sand and say very strongly, never again.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The Israelization: Chertoff turned the Department of Homeland Security into israel’s playground and profit center. In 2007, he personally traveled to Jerusalem to sign a formal security collaboration pact with israel’s Internal Security Minister, Avi Dichter. The memorandum cemented cooperation on counterterrorism, aviation security, intelligence-sharing and joint R&D of anti-terror technologies. In plain English, Chertoff made israel a partner in U.S. domestic security policy. He openly gushed about adopting Israeli models: “israel has a lot of experience,” Chertoff told Reuters in 2008, praising israeli behavior-detection methods for airport screening. He even admitted he was looking to import israeli technology and tactics – from advanced explosives scanners to techniques for spotting “suspicious” travelers. At an international homeland security conference in Tel Aviv, Chertoff was literally swapping notes with israeli officials on how to fortify America. And it wasn’t just talk: During Chertoff’s tenure, DHS became a cash cow for Israeli defense contractors, buying up israeli surveillance cameras, scanners, and drones. By 2007, israel’s homeland security exports had skyrocketed 20%, hitting $1.2 billion a year, with DHS as one of israel’s most reliable markets. As Naomi Klein observed, “israel has struck oil... The oil is the war on terror.” Chertoff was the eager driller, ensuring an endless demand for israeli “anti-terror” gadgets to spy on, imprison and control. The American people’s fear and tax dollars were diverted straight into Israel’s security-industrial complex. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/u-s-israel-memorandum-of-mutual-understanding-on-homeland-security-february-2007

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The Profit: Chertoff left DHS in 2009 to cash in on the police-state infrastructure he built. He promptly co-founded The Chertoff Group, a “security consulting” firm that monetizes the contacts and knowledge he amassed. Among its first clients? Rapiscan, manufacturer of the full-body airport scanners that became ubiquitous after a Nigerian “underwear bomber” tried to ignite a plane on Christmas 2009. Chertoff shamelessly went on CNN pushing these nude-image scanners as the answer to terrorism – all while on the payroll of the scanner company, a conflict of interest most media only meekly noted. Not mentioned was a deeper conflict: The underwear bomber slipped through security at Amsterdam’s Schiphol airport thanks to ICTS International, an israeli-run security firm founded by ex-Shin Bet agents. Chertoff never breathed a word about that inconvenient fact. Instead, he leveraged the panic to sell israeli-style high-tech screening (and line his pockets). This pattern repeats over and over. Chertoff became a globetrotting consultant, pitching “cybersecurity” and “homeland security” solutions – often developed in israel or by israeli-linked companies – to governments and corporations. He sits on corporate boards, turns up at israeli think-tank summits, and gives keynote speeches about fighting “terrorism” (always aligned with israeli interests). In short, the man who once ostensibly guarded America now profits by spreading the israeli security gospel worldwide. It’s the classic revolving door of the military-intelligence complex – only with a foreign twist.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on shifts in aviation security in the wake of the Christmas Day terror attempt. The president labeled the incident as a systemic failure, not just about one person’s misstep, prompting ongoing concerns about how to strengthen protections, including the use of CT scans (full-body scanners) that use radiation and have seen rapid adoption. A preliminary report on the Christmas Day attack is expected tomorrow, focusing on the Northwest jet traveling to Detroit. Eyewitnesses at Amsterdam Schiphol provided a notable account. Kurt and Lori Haskell spoke about a remarkable scene at the gate, while Rochelle Keepman, who was onboard the same flight, described what she observed in Amsterdam. Rochelle Keepman recounted seeing two men near the boarding gate: a poor-looking Black teenage boy (around 16–17) and a wealthier-looking Indian man (about 50). She noted that the Indian man spoke, telling the ticket agent that “this man needs to board the plane, but he doesn’t have a passport.” The agent replied that without a passport the man cannot board, to which the Indian man responded, “He's from Sudan. We do this all the time.” The ticket agent told them to speak with a manager and directed them down a hallway; Keepman did not see the Indian man again, while the Black man she did see again later tried to blow up the plane. In discussing screening and protective measures, a DHS official (Campbell) emphasized that any security system has human error and that a layered security approach is essential. The strategy aims to ensure that if one layer fails, another catches the threat. He acknowledged the complication that screening occurred overseas, where the U.S. has less control than domestically. He proposed several improvements: deploying full-body scanning machines in the U.S. to detect concealments under clothing. This technology has faced strong opposition from the ACLU and privacy advocates, and the House of Representatives previously voted to prevent its use. The official asserted there is now a vivid lesson in the value of the machinery. During the segment, the official acknowledged his dual role as a security consultant representing companies that manufacture these technologies, noting, “Absolute absolutely correct,” in response to a question about potential conflicts of interest. Market reaction reflected heightened interest in security technologies: makers of security devices and biometric technologies rose in global trading, with ICX Technologies up 35%, L-3 Communications up 1.5%, and OSI Systems up 10%, as the push for full-body scanners at airports gained momentum.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, what the president said, though, was systemic failure, you know, you know, bigger than than one guy dropping the ball or at least from what he seems to to know. And new concerns tonight about a popular procedure, the CT scan. The test uses radiation to see inside our bodies and its use has grown dramatically. Speaker 1: President Obama is expecting a preliminary report tomorrow on the Christmas Day terror attack on a Northwest jet headed for Detroit. That flight originated, of course Speaker 0: Well, joining us now, passengers Kurt and Lori Haskell, who told authorities about a remarkable scene they witnessed at the gate in Amsterdam. Also with us tonight is Rochelle Keepman, who was onboard that flight. Walk us through what you saw in Amsterdam. Speaker 2: Sure. Laurie and I were sitting near the, boarding gate, sitting on the floor. There weren't any seats to sit in. And, I saw two men, and they caught my eye because they seemed to be an odd pair. One was, what I would describe as a poor looking black teenager around 16 or 17. And the other the other man, a a age 50 ish, wealthy looking Indian man, and I was just wondering why they were together. Kinda strange. And I watched them approach what I would call the the ticket agent, the final person that checks your boarding pass before you get on the plane. And I could hear the entire conversation. The only person that spoke was the Indian man. And what he said was, this man needs to board the plane, but he doesn't have a passport. And the ticket agent responded, well, if he doesn't have a passport, you can't get on the plane, to which the Indian man responded back. He's from Sudan. We do this all the time. And the ticket agent said, well, then you'll have to go and talk to my manager, and she directed that them down a hallway. And and that was the last time that I saw the Indian man. Mhmm. And And the black man, I didn't see again until he tried to blow up our plane. Speaker 0: When we talk about screenings at the airport and other protective mechanisms along the way, what should we be doing that clearly we're not? Speaker 3: Well, Campbell, the strategy recognizes that there's always gonna be human error in any system. You can't count on perfection. And that's why we built a strategy, at the Department of Homeland Security, what we call layered security. A number of different layers so that even if one fails, another one gets picked up. It's complicated here, of course, because the actual screening took place overseas where The US ability to control what goes on is is obviously not the same as it is here. But there are a few things we could do to make things better. First, we could deploy the scanning the scanning machines that we currently are beginning to deploy in The US that would give us the ability to see what someone has concealed underneath their clothing. That has been vigorously opposed by the ACLU and privacy advocates. The House of Representatives voted to prevent us from using it, but I think now there's been a very vivid lesson in the value of that machinery. Speaker 0: Okay. Can I stop you there for a second? I I know you've been an advocate of this technology for a long time. Correct. But just in the interest of full disclosure, I also wanna point out in your current role as a security consultant, you are representing some of the companies who manufacture that technology. Correct? Speaker 3: Absolute absolutely correct. Yeah. Okay. Speaker 2: Age 50, wealthy looking Indian man, and I was just wondering why they were together. Speaker 1: And as you can imagine as a result of that, makers of security devices and biometric technologies soared today in global trading. Here you can see ICX technologies up 35%, l three communications up one and a half percent, and OSI systems rising as well. Here 10%, all rising as the push for full body scanners at airports continues to gain momentum.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The Network: Chertoff never operated alone. His rise and rampage through post-9/11 America was enabled by a constellation of like-minded, pro-israel allies in key positions – the people who opened doors for him, shielded him, and ensured no investigation ever drifted toward Tel Aviv. Ashcroft – The Cover From Above Attorney General John Ashcroft, a committed Christian Zionist, eagerly cracked down on muslim charities and detainees – but gave israeli espionage suspects a pass. Under Ashcroft, the DOJ’s priorities were clear: arabs were hunted, israelis were protected. Mueller – The Loyal Enforcer FBI Director Robert Mueller worked hand-in-glove with Chertoff to smother the israeli “art student” spy scandal. The Bureau focused on muslim patsies, while israelis caught in surveillance operations were quietly flown home. Mueller kept the FBI’s eyes only where Chertoff wanted them. Hellerstein – The Judicial Firewall In the courts, federal Judge Alvin Hellerstein controlled all 9/11 civil litigation. His own son moved to israel in 2001 to work for a law firm representing ICTS, the israeli security company tied to airport failures on 9/11. Despite this glaring conflict, Hellerstein forced victims’ lawsuits into sealed settlements, ensuring no trial ever probed israeli angles. He closed the courtroom door before anyone could even knock. Lieberman – The Political Muscle Senator Joe Lieberman, openly calling himself a “guardian of israel,” shepherded DHS into existence and pushed Chertoff’s agenda at every turn. He guaranteed congressional compliance, funding, and silence. The Coordinated Machine This wasn’t coincidence. It was a unified network of U.S. officials whose loyalties bent toward israel, working together to hijack America’s security apparatus. They followed – directly or indirectly – the priorities of a foreign power and steamrolled anyone who might expose it, from FBI agents to victim families. https://attendingtheworld.wordpress.com/2010/05/08/judge-hellersteins-connection-to-israeli-9-11-defendant/

Judge Hellerstein’s Connection to Israeli 9-11 Defendant 9-11 Judge is Connected to Rothschild-Funded Mossad Culprit ICTS It is very crass and it probably will come back to be critical of me, but there is an expression that is sometimes very useful, 'Money is the universal lubricant.' It makes it easier to go on with one's life. - Alvin K. Hellerstein This bastard judicial… attendingtheworld.wordpress.com

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The Inside Man Origins and Trajectory From his birth in Elizabeth, NJ (to an Israeli mother who likely served the Mossad) to his post-government profiteering, Michael Chertoff’s entire career reads like a Zionist agent’s resume. But you don’t have to call him an “agent” to see the truth; the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming. Steering the Post-9/11 Response Chertoff was the key insider who methodically steered America’s response to 9/11 away from any scrutiny of Israel, while refocusing our entire domestic security apparatus in Israel’s image. He authored the laws that put “Homeland Security” above constitutional rights. Israelizing DHS As DHS chief he fused that department with Israeli tactics and technology at every level. He did exactly what a spy or saboteur would do – only under the cover of high office. As one Middle East analyst famously asked of the post-9/11 security craze: “Which homeland? And whose security?”. In Chertoff’s case, the answers are crystal clear. The Consequences He took Tom Ridge’s fledgling DHS and weaponized it into a de facto extension of the Israeli security state. The result has been disastrous for American liberty and sovereignty. The facts speak for themselves: Michael Chertoff betrayed America from within, advancing a foreign nationalist agenda that has made us all less free and less safe in the name of “homeland security.”

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/WuLF1dEVk0

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Tom Ridge - 1st DHS Secretary - Iran Warhawk https://t.co/OYSBjUUaVk The connection between DHS & Israel starts with the very first Secretary, Tom Ridge. 🧵

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Israeli Infiltration into U.S. Homeland Security Recent investigations have raised red flags about Israeli infiltration into United States governmental systems, particularly within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its sub-agency Immigration and Customs Enforcement

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Israeli Infiltration into U.S. Homeland Security Recent investigations have raised red flags about Israeli infiltration into United States governmental systems, particularly within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its sub-agency Immigration and Customs Enforcement

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/Wygxc85o4a

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

DHS allocated nearly $275 million in 2025 to strengthen security for houses of worship and nonprofit organizations. Despite the 730% surge in attacks on Christian churches since 2018, jewish organizations remained the chief beneficiaries of federal security funding receiving nearly $100 million from the total of $274.5 million.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/Q70lHzI94u

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

This was yesterday.. the DHS "accidentally" leaked data. The Scope of Exposure and Immediate Fallout Estimates suggest that up to 5,000 unauthorized individuals may have gained access, though DHS officials have downplayed the figure, citing internal audits that identified only a fraction of those interactions as malicious. The breach echoes past incidents, such as the 2018 DHS data compromise reported by BleepingComputer, where over 247,000 employee records were stolen from a secure database. In this latest case, however, the exposed data included operational intelligence that could compromise ongoing investigations, raising alarms about national security risks.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/SIcOuawxep

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

🧵Intro To - Palantir. (Deep Thread) An Israeli Corp. that effectively owns the US. Overview While we’re distracted by petty squabbles—both online and offline—trapped in the day-to-day grind and meaningless noise, the world’s wealthiest elites work in lockstep toward a single goal: forging a technocratic terror state. In this system, any dissent against their “utopian” nightmare is branded as terrorism. They're building a “pre-crime” prison planet, where refusing to be their chattel triggers AI-driven judgments on your very worthiness to live. Right now, if there is one thing demands your attention: Palantir. The people behind it, the corporations weaponizing it, and the governments deploying it—this is the threat you cannot afford to ignore. Palantir isn’t just software; it’s an AI weapon system being embedded into every aspect of your life. Fully tied into the largest asset management groups in the world and your government. This is a “commercial” from Palantir.

VoxExVeritas
Posted - December 2, 2025 at 4:26 AM
Saved - December 26, 2025 at 12:19 PM

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

I have to admit, that's quite the cohencidence. Erica Kirk https://t.co/PbO8Yv8oYl

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/b5srVkTp8X

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Michael Chertoff - 2nd DHS Sec. - Zionist🧵 We basically let an israeli run US HOMELAND SECURITY ... at the same time the DHS Twitter account was created. Michael Chertoff was appointed to head the 9/11 criminal investigation by Bush. He let the Dancing Israelis go. His father was a rabbi and Talmud teacher. His mother Livia Eisen was the first "hostess" of Israel Mossad El Al airlines. Chertoff also co-authored the Patriot Act He now sits on the advisory board for Carbyne

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/nxUBhaPKZQ

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/bPodma3AZe

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/QW6dzMKOOT

@TheOGHutz - The Hutz

@VoxExVeritas Predictive programming showing airplanes hitting the twin towers can be seen in many well known cartoons leading up to 9/11. I'm sure it's just a coincidence. Probably nothing. https://t.co/Ou1CdGgQVb

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 announces that the Legion of Doom is about to begin its reign of terror. Speaker 1 chimes in with a departure plan: Gangway. Oh oh Have to see New York. We could all go with the bus company's special super sitter fare. $9? This one's on Nick. Speaker 2 joins with a provocative aside about Osama Bin Laden not knowing show tunes, followed by a lyric: God, I hope I get it. I hope I get it. Wait and see. Oh, you're stupid. Speaker 1 retorts: Oh, you're stupider. Speaker 2 responds: No. You're. Speaker 1: It. Speaker 0 then asserts a ruthless objective: It is time. We will now strike at the heart of American defense and destroy the Pentagon with one swift and deadly blow. Speaker 1 adds another menacing plan: Go bust into tower. We're coming in. Oh, and I'm out of here. Speaker 0 concludes with a stark result: The towers are falling.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Legion of Doom is about to begin its reign of terror. Speaker 1: Gangway. Oh oh Have to see New York. We could all go with the bus company's special super sitter fare. $9? This one's on Nick. Speaker 2: Let's hope Osama Bin Laden doesn't know show tunes. God, I hope I get it. I hope I get it. Wait and see. Oh, you're stupid. Speaker 1: Oh, you're stupider. Speaker 2: No. You're Speaker 1: It Speaker 0: is time. We will now strike at the heart of American defense and destroy the Pentagon with one swift and deadly blow. Speaker 1: Go bust into tower. We're coming in. Oh, and I'm out of here. Speaker 0: The towers are falling.
VoxExVeritas
Posted - November 23, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Saved - December 25, 2025 at 12:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion alleging long-standing Israeli espionage against the U.S. highlights DHS/ICE vulnerabilities, use of Israeli spyware (Graphite) via Paragon, and past incidents like Pollard’s leaks and White House surveillance. The thread argues that ally status does not erase risks, urges strict vetting of foreign tech, tighter counterintelligence, and reassessment of foreign involvement in security systems. It frames cooperation as potentially exploitable by Israel.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Israeli Infiltration into U.S. Homeland Security Recent investigations have raised red flags about Israeli infiltration into United States governmental systems, particularly within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its sub-agency Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). While Israel is considered a close U.S. ally, evidence shows that Israeli intelligence and companies have actively penetrated U.S. security infrastructure – sometimes with American cooperation, other times through covert espionage [1][2]. This report examines the extent of Israeli infiltration and how it poses a national security threat. The findings reveal a “schizoid” relationship [3]: even as the U.S. and Israel cooperate closely, Israeli entities have repeatedly exploited that trust, leaving American officials sounding the alarm over our vulnerabilities and naivete in the face of such brazen activities.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

A Pattern of Espionage and Infiltration Despite official denials, Israel has a long history of aggressive espionage operations against the United States. A leaked 2007 NSA document (revealed by Edward Snowden) singled out Israel as a top espionage threat to U.S. government and intelligence services [4][5]. In fact, a U.S. National Intelligence Estimate ranked Israel’s intelligence apparatus as “the third most aggressive” against the U.S., behind only China and Russia [6]. This is extraordinary given Israel is ostensibly an ally – yet U.S. counterintelligence experts warn that “one of NSA’s biggest threats is actually from friendly intelligence services, like Israel”[7]. The breadth of Israeli operations has included espionage targeting U.S. government agencies, military and tech sectors, and  “manipulation /influence operations aimed at U.S. public opinion and policymakers [8]. Simply put, Israeli spy services have not hesitated to steal secrets or influence U.S. decision-making from within.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The Jonathan Pollard Case:  The most infamous example is Jonathan Pollard, a U.S. Navy intelligence analyst who betrayed America by spying for Israel in the 1980s. Pollard stole an astonishing volume of classified documents – by one account, “10 feet by 6 feet by 6 feet” of secrets[9] – including signal intelligence manuals, surveillance parameters, and intelligence reports. Among the troves was the NSA’s national SIGINT requirements list, detailing which communications the U.S. intercepted worldwide[10]. U.S. prosecutors said the damage Pollard caused was “beyond calculation”[11], one of the worst security breaches in American history. Shockingly, intelligence analysts believe some of Pollard’s stolen intel was handed to the Soviet Union – via Israeli intelligence – as a bargaining chip[12][13]. In other words, Israeli handlers traded U.S. secrets to Moscow, leveraging what Pollard stole to benefit Israel’s interests (such as securing Soviet Jewry’s emigration or deterring Soviet support to Arab states)[14][15]. Pollard’s handler in Israel was reportedly responsible for aiming Israel’s nuclear missiles at the USSR, and much of Pollard’s data was used to enhance Israel’s targeting capabilities[16]. This “Samson Option”-style strategy – threatening a nuclear strike to constrain superpower behavior – exemplifies how Israel used infiltrated intel for nuclear brinkmanship. (Notably, Pollard served 30 years in prison yet was hailed as a hero in Israel upon release[17][18], a stark reminder of the divergent perspectives between U.S. security and Israeli objectives.)

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Jonathan Pollard explaining how they threated to use "unconventional" weapons on the US in retaliation for not supplying them with weapons.🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Henry Kissinger instituted an arms embargo that stopped the aerial resupply of Israel to extract diplomatic concessions. In response, an A-4 Skyhawk with weapons under its wings was observed at Tel Nof Air Base, and we told the Americans to take a good look at the airplane on the runway. The next day, the airlift started, referring to the arms airlift to Israel. The discussion indicated a threat to use unconventional weapons, and the speaker stated that they should proceed with it if necessary, and that if the Americans thought they were bluffing, they should go forward with it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 1973, during the Yom Kippur War, when Henry Kissinger instituted an arms embargo against us. He he stopped the aerial resupply of our army at that point to extract, diplomatic concessions from us. And what happened? What happened was, an A four Skyhawk was parked at Telenorf Air Base with some interesting weapons under its wings and we told the Americans, take your eye in the sky and take a good look at the airplane that's on that runway. And the next day, the airlift started. So, the guy that I was talking Which airlift? To Israel. The arms airlift. So, in other words, we threatened their We threatened to use unconventional weapons. I'll leave it at that. And so he said, is this what you want us to threaten now? I said, absolutely. Except this time, I want us to go forward with it if necessary. If they think we're bluffing, we go forward with it. Look.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Israeli Nuclear Trigger Smuggling - Netanyahu The MILCO–Heli Trading Network On June 27, 2012, the FBI partially declassified and released seven additional pages from a 1985–2002 investigation into how a network of front companies connected to the Israeli Ministry of Defense illegally smuggled nuclear triggers out of the U.S. (1)🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
New revelations in the Netanyahu trial emerge as Hollywood producer Arnand Milchin testifies that the Israeli prime minister demanded lavish gifts in exchange for favors. Speaking by video link from Brighton, United Kingdom, Milchin says Netanyahu and his wife received expensive cigars and crates of champagne, and alleges that in return Netanyahu helped Milchin secure a US visa extension and pushed for tax breaks that would have benefited the producer. Netanyahu appeared in court for Milchin’s testimony. Milchin, whose credits include Pretty Woman, Gone Girl, and LA Confidential, adds that Netanyahu had complained that some of the cigars were the wrong diameter, while his wife objected to the type of champagne they received. The gifts allegedly included jewelry valued at around $200,000. The trial began in 2020 and is one of three corruption cases that Netanyahu is facing; he and his wife deny any wrongdoing. The testimony comes as Netanyahu’s government revives controversial judicial reforms that had been put on ice in March amid widespread protests. Protesters demonstrating in Brighton surrounded the hotel where Milchin was speaking. In Israel, this is part of the greater protest movement that is ongoing, with activists and supporters continuing demonstrations. A commentator in the report notes that this is part of a broader effort to ensure that “this will not going to happen,” referencing the protests. Milchin’s disclosures form part of the broader political and legal crisis surrounding Netanyahu, who faces multiple investigations and charges. The report highlights that critics argue the reforms aim to reduce the power of Israel’s Supreme Court, with opponents claiming the goal is to shield Netanyahu from corruption charges and to destroy the balance between branches of government, potentially leading to a dictatorship. The period has been marked by prolonged political instability in Israel, including five elections in the last four years. The latest allegations regarding Milchin’s testimony are expected to intensify an already polarized national climate. Rupert Stone reports for TRT World.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: New revelations in the trial of Netanyahu. A Hollywood producer on Sunday accused the Israeli prime minister of demanding lavish gifts in exchange for favors. Testifying by video link from Brighton in The United Kingdom, Arnand Milchin told the Jerusalem court how Netanyahu and his wife had received expensive cigars and crates of champagne. In exchange, Netanyahu allegedly helped Milchin secure a US visa extension and also pushed tax breaks that would have benefited the producer. Netanyahu appeared in court for Milchin's testimony. And in Brighton, Israeli protesters surrounded the hotel where the producer was speaking. Speaker 1: This is part of the greater protest movement that's happening right now in Israel. We're following them wherever they are in the world to make sure that they know that this will not going to happen. Speaker 0: Milchin, whose credits include Pretty Woman, Gone Girl, and LA Confidential, described how Netanyahu had complained that some of the cigars were the wrong diameter, while his wife had taken issue with the type of champagne they received. The gifts allegedly included jewelry with a value of around $200,000. The trial began in 2020 and is one of three corruption cases that Netanyahu is facing. He and his wife deny any wrongdoing. The testimony comes as Netanyahu's government resuscitates controversial judicial reforms that it had put on ice in March in the face of widespread protests. Critics claim that the reforms, which reduced the power of Israel's supreme court, are intended to shield Netanyahu from the corruption charges. Speaker 2: To once again try to ruin the Israeli democracy by making horrible laws. That's only goal is to destroy the the democracy of Israel, to destroy any balance between the different branches of the government in order to make it a a dictatorship at the end of the day. Speaker 0: Israel has faced a period of prolonged political instability with five elections in the last four years. And these latest allegations will only serve to deepen an already polarized nation. Rupert Stone. TRT World. Thank you.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Other Espionage Incidents: The worst of which is right there☝️🏻 Pollard was not an isolated case. Throughout the 1990s and 2000s, U.S. counterintelligence frequently caught Israeli spies snooping on American soil. A 2014 Newsweek investigation revealed that from the mid-1990s onward – well after Israel’s post-Pollard promise to halt spying in the U.S. – FBI agents had to repeatedly confront Israeli officials about espionage[19]. One former top FBI counterintelligence officer said that in the decade after 9/11, Israeli diplomats in Washington were summoned “dozens” of times and told to “cut the shit,” only to shrug off the warnings [20][21].  “You can’t embarrass an Israeli,” the ex-official noted. “Catch them red-handed, and they shrug and say, ‘Okay, anything else?’”[22]. This brazen attitude was enabled by Israel’s political clout: as an ally, they almost always got away with only a scolding[23]. U.S. security personnel felt pressure from the “Israeli lobby” – influential friends of Israel in Congress and the administration – which protested strongly against any tough retaliation for Israeli spying [24]. Intelligence briefings about Israeli espionage had to be handled “very carefully,” as outraged pro-Israel lawmakers would intervene if they felt Israel was being slighted [25]. Such political interference often tied the hands of U.S. agencies, allowing Israeli infiltration activities to continue with impunity.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

White House Surveillance:  One especially egregious espionage operation came to light in 2019 when U.S. officials discovered that cellphone eavesdropping devices (StingRays) were planted around the White House and other sensitive DC sites[26]. These miniature devices mimic cell towers to intercept calls and texts. A forensic investigation by the FBI and DHS concluded “it was pretty clear that the Israelis were responsible” for the spy devices – likely intending to monitor then-President Trump’s communications[27][28]. Israel’s government vehemently denied the accusation, reiterating its official policy not to conduct espionage in the U.S.[29]. But multiple former U.S. intelligence officials affirmed the evidence of Israeli involvement, and noted that the Trump administration (priding itself on being “the most pro-Israel” in history) chose not to publicly rebuke Israel for this brazen spying[30]. Under any other circumstances, planting bugs near the White House would prompt severe diplomatic fallout; in this case, it was largely swept under the rug. The incident demonstrates Israel’s willingness to target the highest levels of U.S. government – even the President – and how political considerations can prevent full accountability. Such infiltration of communications at the heart of U.S. power is a glaring national security breach.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Diplomatic and Industrial Espionage:  Israeli espionage has extended into diplomatic arenas and the private sector as well. During sensitive U.S.-led negotiations (for example, the 2013 Iran nuclear talks), Israeli eavesdropping was suspected – Der Spiegel reported that Israel intercepted calls of Secretary of State John Kerry during peace negotiations[31]. Likewise, Israel has been accused of running “influence operations” to covertly sway U.S. policy and public opinion[32]. In business and tech, Israeli companies have sometimes been seen as Trojan horses. For instance, in the early 2000s, investigations (including a now-infamous Fox News report) pointed to Israeli telecom firms with U.S. contracts – such as Amdocs (handling U.S. phone billing records) and Comverse Infosys (providing wiretapping equipment to law enforcement) – as potential conduits for Israeli intelligence. The concern was that these firms’ access to American communications data could be exploited to feed information back to Israel, compromising the integrity of U.S. telecommunications. One counterintelligence veteran told CounterPunch, “Trojan horse espionage is part of the way of life of companies in Israel. It’s a culture of spying”, indicating that seemingly legitimate tech business can double as espionage tools[33]. While Israeli officials denied such allegations and some reports were controversial, the fear of backdoors in critical infrastructure was very real – so much so that pursuing the inquiry was described as “career suicide” for U.S. investigators[34]. These episodes underscore the broad scope of Israeli infiltration, from bugging government buildings to embedding in supply chains.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Infiltration of DHS and ICE Systems In recent years, Israel’s reach has extended into the heart of DHS through technology contracts and partnerships. The most striking example is the introduction of Israeli-made spyware into ICE’s operations, raising alarms about foreign influence over U.S. domestic security tools. The Paragon Spyware Deal: In 2024, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) quietly contracted with Paragon Solutions, an Israeli-founded cyber-intelligence company, to obtain its premier spyware product called “Graphite.” Graphite is a powerful zero-click phone hacking tool – it can remotely penetrate any smartphone, even encrypted apps like WhatsApp or Signal, without the target’s knowledge[35][36]. Once deployed, Graphite essentially takes control of a phone, allowing operators to track the user’s location, read messages and photos, and even turn the phone’s microphone or camera into a live surveillance device*[37]. In effect, this spyware can vacuum up every intimate detail from a target’s mobile device – a capability “once reserved for the world’s most vaunted spy agencies,” now being handed to a domestic law enforcement agency[38]. The ICE-Paragon contract (worth about $2 million) was initially signed under the Biden administration in late 2024[39]. However, Biden’s team paused the deal for a compliance review, since just months earlier the White House had issued an Executive Order banning U.S. agencies from using commercial spyware that poses counterintelligence or security risks[40]. This Executive Order was motivated by scandals involving tools like Pegasus (made by Israel’s NSO Group) which had been misused by foreign governments to target dissidents and even U.S. citizens. In fact, the Biden administration took the unprecedented step of blacklisting NSO Group on a Commerce Department export-control list for its role in “maliciously targeting” journalists and activists abroad[41]. - (Pretty fucked up that the dems were making better national security choices than the Trump admin isn't it?) - Paragon’s Graphite, as a similar tool, fell into a gray area – it wasn’t blacklisted, but its use had to be evaluated under the new spyware guidelines. In mid-2025, the Trump administration (having returned to office) abruptly lifted the hold and reactivated the Paragon deal[42][43]. ICE’s cyber unit was now cleared to deploy “one of the world’s most sophisticated hacking tools”[44], developed outside the U.S. by former Israeli intelligence veterans. Notably, Paragon had been acquired by a U.S. investment firm in 2024 (perhaps to assuage ownership concerns), but its product’s origin and core developers remain Israeli[45][46]. This move essentially arms a domestic agency with foreign-made spyware, raising serious national security questions.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Risks of Foreign Spyware in U.S. Agencies: From a U.S. government perspective, allowing Israeli spyware into DHS systems should be viewed as extremely perilous. First, there’s the counterintelligence risk: Graphite is a proprietary tool that Israel has also sold to other countries. As Citizen Lab researcher John Scott-Railton warns, “As long as the same mercenary spyware tech is going to multiple governments, there is a baked-in counterintelligence risk”[47]. Any nation that has access to Graphite (or knowledge of its exploits) could potentially detect its use or develop countermeasures, nullifying our operational advantage[48].  Even worse, those foreign clients – or the company’s own insiders – would “know what secret surveillance tech the US is using,” and gain “special insights on how to track what the US is doing with it.”[49] I n short, by using an Israeli commercial spyware, we are exposing our playbook to others who have the same tool. This undermines U.S. intelligence and law enforcement secrecy.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Secondly, there’s the risk of improper use or backdoors. The Biden executive order explicitly warned against spyware that could be misused by a foreign government or person[50]. Paragon claims it abides by “democratic values” and only works with authorized governments, but refuses to disclose its clients or how they use the tech[51][52]. We have to ask: what assurance do we have that data obtained via Graphite remains only in U.S. hands? If the spyware “phones home” for updates or if Israeli engineers retained any access, sensitive information from Americans’ devices could leak abroad. Indeed, the U.S. has historically been wary of foreign-made surveillance tech precisely because of such hidden risks[53]. (For example, concerns about Kaspersky anti-virus software – a Russian product – led to it being banned from U.S. government networks due to fears it might covertly channel data to Moscow. The same logic applies here with an Israeli product.) Furthermore, the quiet, under-the-radar approval of Graphite for ICE hints at a lapse in vetting. Nadine Farid Johnson of the Knight First Amendment Institute pointed out that waiving the stop-work order without public explanation suggests parts of the executive branch may have skirted their own vetting requirements[54]. In other words, someone pushed this through “without adherence” to the normal security reviews[55]. That raises the question: Who advocated for the Israeli spyware, and were security concerns fully addressed or overridden for political reasons? If proper due diligence was sidelined, that itself is a sign of potential undue influence or infiltration in decision-making.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Other DHS Inroads:  Israeli firms have long been entwined with U.S. homeland security beyond just spyware. The global homeland security industry features many Israeli companies (often founded by ex-military/intel officers) selling surveillance cameras, bomb detection tech, screening systems, and more. In fact, Israeli expertise in counterterrorism has been actively courted by U.S. agencies since 9/11 – sometimes with open arms[56][57]. For instance, DHS has purchased Israeli-made cameras and screening tools, and American officials regularly visit Israel to learn security techniques[58][59]. On the surface, this is cooperation – but it also creates dependencies on foreign technology and methods. A notable example is when U.S. airport security adopted Israeli behavior-detection techniques, effectively importing Israeli methodology into TSA protocols[60]. While such collaboration is not espionage, it does embed Israeli approaches and products deeply into our security infrastructure. If any of those products have undisclosed vulnerabilities or if Israeli firms maintain any control (e.g., software updates), it provides an avenue for infiltration. The sheer prevalence of Israeli contractors in U.S. security – sometimes jokingly referred to as Israel being the “14th Department of Homeland Security” – means vigilance is needed. Even friendly partnerships can mask a quiet siphoning of information. Imagine what israel is doing, considering how they just welcomed back Pollard like a hero.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Compromised National Secrets: When a foreign country infiltrates U.S. systems, our most sensitive information and plans are at risk. In the case of Israel, the damage from past espionage has been massive – Pollard’s theft alone compromised U.S. intelligence capabilities worldwide[61][62]. Pollard handed over detailed NSA manuals and surveillance schedules, meaning Israel (and by extension, other actors who obtained the info) knew exactly what U.S. intelligence was monitoring and how[63][64]. Such knowledge allows an adversary to evade U.S. eyes and even hunt down U.S. assets. Indeed, there were “losses of human and technical intelligence” inside Soviet territory attributed to Pollard’s leaks[65] – a chilling implication that American spies or informants likely died or were compromised as a result. Every time Israeli operatives infiltrate an agency like DHS or ICE, there’s a chance that counterterrorism data, classified reports, or personal data on Americans could be siphoned out. This isn’t just hypothetical – Israeli spies have been caught with U.S. State Department cryptographic codes in the past, and attempts to bug the White House show even top-secret conversations are not off-limits[66]. Allowing Israeli-developed tools into our networks could inadvertently grant backdoor access to those secrets we haven’t already willingly shared.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Counterintelligence Nightmare: From a counterintelligence standpoint, Israeli infiltration is especially vexing because it exploits our trust and our open system. The U.S. and Israel share a great deal of intelligence as "allies" – but Israel has been known to “trade” what it learns, even U.S.-derived intel, with third parties to advance its agenda[67][68]. This double game makes it hard for American officials to fully trust that information or technology shared with Israel will remain secure. Moreover, when Israel sells advanced spyware or security tech around the world (often built on expertise gained partly through U.S. funding or cooperation), it erodes U.S. technological edge and creates global vulnerabilities. “Mercenary spyware” like Graphite being in multiple hands means the U.S. cannot monopolize its offensive cyber tools[69]. Adversaries can study these tools, detect them, and even reverse-engineer them. In essence, Israeli companies’ global business can telegraph U.S. methods to hostile actors – a serious risk if ICE or other agencies rely on those tools. A government analyst would note that any foreign-supplied technology in a sensitive domain must be treated as a potential Trojan horse.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Blackmail and Leverage: The Name Of The Game Perhaps the most disturbing aspect is how Israeli infiltrations can be used to blackmail or pressure the United States. Because of the unique U.S.-Israel political relationship, Israeli officials have at times pushed the envelope, knowing Washington’s responses are constrained. Former CIA officer John Kiriakou recently revealed a stunning example: during a conflict, Israeli officials privately threatened the Trump administration that Israel would use nuclear weapons against Iran if the U.S. refused to bomb Iran’s nuclear sites[70][71]. This was essentially nuclear extortion, leveraging Israel’s clandestine arsenal (built in part with materials and know-how often acquired without U.S. approval) to force America’s hand. (Pollard also made nuclear threat: see above) President Trump reportedly felt he had to consider U.S. airstrikes as the “lesser evil” to prevent Israel from resorting to nukes[72]. Such extreme coercion highlights the unthinkable leverage a foreign ally tried to exert over U.S. policy – a scenario that would be impossible had the U.S. not allowed Israel to develop such capabilities under wraps. Now consider espionage: if Israel, through an infiltrated system or spy, obtains compromising information on U.S. leaders or plans, it could threaten to leak or misuse that intel unless the U.S. aligns with Israeli interests. In effect, Israeli intelligence could “laugh in our faces,” knowing they hold cards to manipulate U.S. decision-making. (as they're doing now) The “Samson Option” mindset – if cornered, take everyone down with you – means Israel might not shy away from using even blackmail with sensitive U.S. data or technology. This is not a hypothetical fear; it’s grounded in incidents like the Pollard affair, where Israel initially denied involvement, then relentlessly lobbied for Pollard’s release for decades[73][74]. The takeaway is that a penetrated ally can quickly turn into a perilous adversary when interests diverge, armed with our own secrets.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Undermining U.S. Sovereignty and Law: Allowing Israeli infiltration also undercuts the rule of law and U.S. sovereignty. For example, ICE’s use of Graphite spyware raises constitutional and legal issues. This tool, designed originally by and for foreign intelligence, is highly invasive, potentially violating privacy rights if misused. Its deployment against people on U.S. soil without robust oversight could lead to Israel targeting journalists, activists, or lawyers (as has happened abroad with similar spyware[75][76]). There are multiple examples of this in play as we speak. Example: By quietly outsourcing such capability to an Israeli entity, DHS is bypassing domestic restrictions and expertise, creating a accountability gap. Moreover, when Israeli spying incidents are hushed up due to political pressure[77][78], it signals that certain allies are above the law. This erodes morale among U.S. counterintelligence officers (who see their work brushed aside) and sets a dangerous precedent. If Israeli agents can infiltrate and face no real consequences, what message does that send to other foreign intelligence services? It practically invites further penetration by others who assume the U.S. won’t retaliate strongly. A government agency must treat any breach – even by a "friend" – as a serious offense, or risk losing control of its security environment.

@JDVance - JD Vance

Sloan Rachmuth is a "journalist" who has decided to obsessively attack a staffer in his 20s because she doesn't like the views of his father. Every time I see a public attack on Buckley it's a complete lie. And yes, I notice ever person with an agenda who unfairly attacks a

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Humiliating our National Security Establishment: Finally, Israeli infiltration, when exposed, embarrasses the United States on the world stage. Our adversaries and allies alike observe these episodes. When Israeli ex-agents or politicians boast in private about how “easy” it was to dupe America, it degrades U.S. credibility and deterrence. Indeed, the sheer boldness of some operations (like the White House spying) suggests Israeli operatives believed the U.S. was either owned, too distracted or too timid to catch them – essentially viewing America as an easy mark. This perception is deeply dangerous: if foreign operatives are “laughing” at U.S. security for being so permeable, it invites even riskier intrusions by others. Already, one former U.S. intelligence official noted that dealing with Israeli spies was uniquely frustrating because “no matter how high [the U.S. official], [the Israelis] throw everything at you” – from lavish hospitality to sexual entrapment(Epstein) – in attempts to breach security[79][80]. Such aggressive tactics imply a confidence that Americans can be easily corrupted or outmaneuvered. We cannot afford to be seen as gullible or weak in protecting our government’s integrity. Every successful Israeli infiltration (left unpunished) projects an image that U.S. security is porous and that we don’t even hold "friends" accountable. That in turn could weaken alliances (partners might fear sharing intel with us if it leaks to Israel) and strengthen enemies (who see opportunity in our laxity).

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Conclusion: Fuck Israel From the perspective of a U.S. government agency tasked with safeguarding national security, Israeli infiltration of our systems – including DHS and ICE – is absolutely unacceptable and presents a multifaceted threat. It endangers our secrets, compromises our technological edge, and even gives a foreign power potential leverage over U.S. policy through illicit means. While cooperation with Israel is claimed to yields benefits in counterterrorism and innovation, the pattern of espionage and overreach documented over decades can no longer be downplayed. American officials have privately expressed astonishment at the “overwhelming” evidence of Israeli spying[81] and interference, which has even halted initiatives like visa waivers in the past. It’s time to echo that astonishment publicly: no ally, however close, should be allowed to infiltrate the U.S. government without consequences. In practical terms, this means rigorously vetting any foreign technology in U.S. security agencies, and enforcing the spirit of laws and executive orders that bar tools posing foreign counterintelligence risks[82]. It means boosting counterespionage monitoring even for allied nation activities – acknowledging that the category of “friendly spy” is not an oxymoron but a reality (as NSA documents made clear[83]). And it likely means reassessing the depth of foreign penetration in areas like communications infrastructure, federal contracting, and even personnel. We should recall the blunt truth voiced by a former U.S. intelligence operative:  "if any country other than Israel conducted this level of spying on us, the outrage would be deafening[84]." U.S. security must not be subject to double standards – the integrity of our nation’s defenses requires that we respond to Israeli infiltration with the same resolve as we would to any other espionage threat. Ultimately, the U.S. cannot allow its benevolence to be weaponized against it. The image of Jonathan Pollard – an American turncoat embraced in Tel Aviv as a hero – laughing with his Israeli handlers about the ease of his betrayal is a lasting blow to our intelligence community. Today, as new forms of infiltration unfold (from spyware in our agents’ hands[85] to Israeli eavesdropping gear outside the Oval Office[86]), we must not be “stupid” or naive about the danger. Infiltration by any foreign actor erodes sovereignty and security – and when that actor is as sophisticated and motivated as Israel, the threat is colossal. The U.S. government must tackle this challenge head-on: through stricter controls, candid exposure of violations, and a firm message that friendship does not grant immunity to subversion. The stakes are nothing less than our national security, sovereignty and self-respect on the world stage. More likely, American lives.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Sources: 1) https://www.newsweek.com/israel-flagged-top-spy-threat-us-new-snowdennsa-document-262991#:~:text=The%20new%20document%20again%20underscores,behind%20only%20China%20and%20Russia 2) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/12/israel-planted-spying-devices-near-white-house-says-report#:~:text=The%20miniature%20surveillance%20devices%20mimic,associates%2C%20the%20news%20website%20reported 3) https://www.newsweek.com/israel-flagged-top-spy-threat-us-new-snowdennsa-document-262991#:~:text=The%20new%20document%20again%20underscores,behind%20only%20China%20and%20Russia 4) https://www.newsweek.com/israel-flagged-top-spy-threat-us-new-snowdennsa-document-262991#:~:text=Israel%20was%20singled%20out%20in,to%20a%20news%20report%20Monday 5) https://www.newsweek.com/israel-flagged-top-spy-threat-us-new-snowdennsa-document-262991#:~:text=and%20Israel%2C%20which%20cooperate%20closely,behind%20only%20China%20and%20Russia 6) https://www.newsweek.com/israel-flagged-top-spy-threat-us-new-snowdennsa-document-262991#:~:text=and%20Israel%2C%20which%20cooperate%20closely,behind%20only%20China%20and%20Russia 7) https://www.newsweek.com/israel-flagged-top-spy-threat-us-new-snowdennsa-document-262991#:~:text=and%20Israel%2C%20which%20cooperate%20closely,behind%20only%20China%20and%20Russia 8) https://www.newsweek.com/israel-flagged-top-spy-threat-us-new-snowdennsa-document-262991#:~:text=In%20a%20section%20of%20the,organs 9) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=Joseph%20diGenova%2C%20the%20prosecutor%20who,in%20a%20specific%20area%2C%20and 10) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=intelligence%20to%20Israel%2C%20including%20satellite,Military%20might%20take 11) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=Damage%20beyond%20Calculation 12) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=Several%20U,and%20they%20create%20an%20indebtedness 13) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=Passing%20Information%20to%20Moscow 14) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=said%20that%20Pollard%20was%20an,allies%20in%20time%20of%20war 15) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=Passing%20Information%20to%20Moscow 16) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=said%20that%20Pollard%20was%20an,allies%20in%20time%20of%20war 17) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=Israeli%20Prime%20Minister%20Benjamin%20Netanyahu,the%20victim%20of%20religious%20discrimination 18) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=Israel%20Disavowed%2C%20Then%20Embraced%20Pollard 19) https://mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newsweek-extensive-pressure/#:~:text=%3E%20Beginning%20in%20the%20mid,%E2%80%93%20usually%20delivered%20personally%20to 20) https://mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newsweek-extensive-pressure/#:~:text=%3E%20Beginning%20in%20the%20mid,%E2%80%93%20usually%20delivered%20personally%20to 21) https://mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newsweek-extensive-pressure/#:~:text=,say%2C%20%E2%80%98Okay%20now%2C%20anything%20else%3F%E2%80%99%E2%80%9D 22) https://mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newsweek-extensive-pressure/#:~:text=,say%2C%20%E2%80%98Okay%20now%2C%20anything%20else%3F%E2%80%99%E2%80%9D 23) https://mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newsweek-extensive-pressure/#:~:text=%3E%20Beginning%20in%20the%20mid,%E2%80%93%20usually%20delivered%20personally%20to 24) https://mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newsweek-extensive-pressure/#:~:text=, 25) https://mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newsweek-extensive-pressure/#:~:text=,%E2%80%9D 26) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/12/israel-planted-spying-devices-near-white-house-says-report#:~:text=Israel%20is%20likely%20to%20have,cited%20three%20former%20US%20officials 27) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/12/israel-planted-spying-devices-near-white-house-says-report#:~:text=The%20miniature%20surveillance%20devices%20mimic,associates%2C%20the%20news%20website%20reported 28) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/12/israel-planted-spying-devices-near-white-house-says-report#:~:text=It%20said%20the%20FBI%20and,official%20was%20quoted%20as%20saying 29) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/12/israel-planted-spying-devices-near-white-house-says-report#:~:text=The%20office%20of%20the%20Israeli,intelligence%20operations%20in%20the%20US%E2%80%9D 30) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/12/israel-planted-spying-devices-near-white-house-says-report#:~:text=In%20the%20article%2C%20one%20of,did%20not%20rebuke%20its%20ally 31) https://www.newsweek.com/israel-flagged-top-spy-threat-us-new-snowdennsa-document-262991#:~:text=In%20a%20series%20of%20articles,over%20cell%20phones%2C%20believing%20the 32) https://www.newsweek.com/israel-flagged-top-spy-threat-us-new-snowdennsa-document-262991#:~:text=In%20a%20section%20of%20the,organs 33) https://www.counterpunch.org/2008/09/27/an-israeli-trojan-horse/#:~:text=An%20Israeli%20Trojan%20Horse%20,culture%20on%20which%20the 34) https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2001/12/17/1124301.php#:~:text=US%20phone%20security%20hijacked%20by,is%20considered%20career%20suicide 35) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=When%20it%20is%20successfully%20deployed,manipulation%20of%20the%20phone%E2%80%99s%20recorder 36) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=When%20it%20is%20successfully%20deployed,manipulation%20of%20the%20phone%E2%80%99s%20recorder 37) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=When%20it%20is%20successfully%20deployed,manipulation%20of%20the%20phone%E2%80%99s%20recorder 38) https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/the-strongmans-surveillance-state/#:~:text=Security%20,world%E2%80%99s%20most%20vaunted%20spy%20outfits 39) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=encrypted%20applications 40) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=An%20executive%20order%20signed%20by,governments%20to%20%E2%80%9Cmaliciously%20target%E2%80%9D%20the 41) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=around%20the%20US%20government%E2%80%99s%20use,human%20rights%20activists%20and%20journalists 42) https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/the-strongmans-surveillance-state/#:~:text=Earlier%20this%20month%20Paragon%20scored,commanders%20of%20the%20world%E2%80%99s%20most 43) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=US%20immigration%20%20agents%20will,phone%20%E2%80%93%20including%20encrypted%20applications 44) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=US%20immigration%20%20agents%20will,phone%20%E2%80%93%20including%20encrypted%20applications 45) https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/the-strongmans-surveillance-state/#:~:text=Earlier%20this%20month%20Paragon%20scored,commanders%20of%20the%20world%E2%80%99s%20most 46) https://www.bostonreview.net/articles/the-strongmans-surveillance-state/#:~:text=opportunity 47) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=%E2%80%9CAs%20long%20as%20the%20same,not%20sure%20how%20this%20goes 48) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=%E2%80%9CAs%20long%20as%20the%20same,not%20sure%20how%20this%20goes 49) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=%E2%80%9CAs%20long%20as%20the%20same,not%20sure%20how%20this%20goes

Israel Flagged as Top Spy Threat to U.S. Israel was identified by the NSA as a security threat in several areas, including "the threat of development of weapons of mass destruction" newsweek.com
Israel accused of planting spying devices near White House Surveillance devices planted over past two years, says report citing former US officials theguardian.com
Israel Flagged as Top Spy Threat to U.S. Israel was identified by the NSA as a security threat in several areas, including "the threat of development of weapons of mass destruction" newsweek.com
Israel Flagged as Top Spy Threat to U.S. Israel was identified by the NSA as a security threat in several areas, including "the threat of development of weapons of mass destruction" newsweek.com
Israel Flagged as Top Spy Threat to U.S. Israel was identified by the NSA as a security threat in several areas, including "the threat of development of weapons of mass destruction" newsweek.com
Israel Flagged as Top Spy Threat to U.S. Israel was identified by the NSA as a security threat in several areas, including "the threat of development of weapons of mass destruction" newsweek.com
Israel Flagged as Top Spy Threat to U.S. Israel was identified by the NSA as a security threat in several areas, including "the threat of development of weapons of mass destruction" newsweek.com
Israel Flagged as Top Spy Threat to U.S. Israel was identified by the NSA as a security threat in several areas, including "the threat of development of weapons of mass destruction" newsweek.com
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
Newsweek: Extensive Israeli spying in the US kept quiet due to pressure from the lobby Jeff Stein has followed up on his Newsweek report from Tuesday on how Israel spies on the U.S. more than any other ally. Today he writes the reason this is not… mondoweiss.net
Newsweek: Extensive Israeli spying in the US kept quiet due to pressure from the lobby Jeff Stein has followed up on his Newsweek report from Tuesday on how Israel spies on the U.S. more than any other ally. Today he writes the reason this is not… mondoweiss.net
Newsweek: Extensive Israeli spying in the US kept quiet due to pressure from the lobby Jeff Stein has followed up on his Newsweek report from Tuesday on how Israel spies on the U.S. more than any other ally. Today he writes the reason this is not… mondoweiss.net
Newsweek: Extensive Israeli spying in the US kept quiet due to pressure from the lobby Jeff Stein has followed up on his Newsweek report from Tuesday on how Israel spies on the U.S. more than any other ally. Today he writes the reason this is not… mondoweiss.net
Newsweek: Extensive Israeli spying in the US kept quiet due to pressure from the lobby Jeff Stein has followed up on his Newsweek report from Tuesday on how Israel spies on the U.S. more than any other ally. Today he writes the reason this is not… mondoweiss.net
Newsweek: Extensive Israeli spying in the US kept quiet due to pressure from the lobby Jeff Stein has followed up on his Newsweek report from Tuesday on how Israel spies on the U.S. more than any other ally. Today he writes the reason this is not… mondoweiss.net
Newsweek: Extensive Israeli spying in the US kept quiet due to pressure from the lobby Jeff Stein has followed up on his Newsweek report from Tuesday on how Israel spies on the U.S. more than any other ally. Today he writes the reason this is not… mondoweiss.net
Israel accused of planting spying devices near White House Surveillance devices planted over past two years, says report citing former US officials theguardian.com
Israel accused of planting spying devices near White House Surveillance devices planted over past two years, says report citing former US officials theguardian.com
Israel accused of planting spying devices near White House Surveillance devices planted over past two years, says report citing former US officials theguardian.com
Israel accused of planting spying devices near White House Surveillance devices planted over past two years, says report citing former US officials theguardian.com
Israel accused of planting spying devices near White House Surveillance devices planted over past two years, says report citing former US officials theguardian.com
Israel Flagged as Top Spy Threat to U.S. Israel was identified by the NSA as a security threat in several areas, including "the threat of development of weapons of mass destruction" newsweek.com
Israel Flagged as Top Spy Threat to U.S. Israel was identified by the NSA as a security threat in several areas, including "the threat of development of weapons of mass destruction" newsweek.com
An Israeli Trojan Horse How Israeli Backdoor Technology Penetrated the U.S. Government's Telecom System and Compromised National Security counterpunch.org
US phone security hijacked by Israeli corps Comverse Infosys & AmDocs : Indybay "Adding to the suspicions is the fact that in Israel, Comverse works closely with the Israeli government, and under special programs, gets reimbursed for up to 50 percent of its research and development costs by the Israeli Ministry of Industry and Trade. But investigators within the DEA, INS and FBI have all told Fox News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying through Comverse is considered career suicide." indybay.org
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
The Strongman’s Surveillance State - Boston Review The Trump administration has unfrozen a Biden-era hold on powerful Israeli-made spyware, now in the hands of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. bostonreview.net
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
The Strongman’s Surveillance State - Boston Review The Trump administration has unfrozen a Biden-era hold on powerful Israeli-made spyware, now in the hands of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. bostonreview.net
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
The Strongman’s Surveillance State - Boston Review The Trump administration has unfrozen a Biden-era hold on powerful Israeli-made spyware, now in the hands of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. bostonreview.net
The Strongman’s Surveillance State - Boston Review The Trump administration has unfrozen a Biden-era hold on powerful Israeli-made spyware, now in the hands of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. bostonreview.net
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Sources 2: 50) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=An%20executive%20order%20signed%20by,governments%20to%20%E2%80%9Cmaliciously%20target%E2%80%9D%20the 51) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=Paragon%20has%20sought%20to%20differentiate,use%20the%20technology%20against%20targets 52) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=tolerance%20policy%20and%20will%20cut,use%20the%20technology%20against%20targets 53) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=The%20US%20government%20has%20in,represents%20a%20potential%20security%20risk 54) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=dramatic%20expansion%20of%20Ice%E2%80%99s%20budget,which%20spyware%20could%20be%20deployed 55) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=dramatic%20expansion%20of%20Ice%E2%80%99s%20budget,which%20spyware%20could%20be%20deployed 56) https://www.rusi.org/publication/israel-plays-key-role-global-homeland-security-business#:~:text=Speaking%20at%20a%20homeland%20security,how%20suicide%20bombers%20are%20profiled 57) https://www.rusi.org/publication/israel-plays-key-role-global-homeland-security-business#:~:text=Globes%20newspaper%2C%20Israel%E2%80%99s%20equivalent%20of,in%20the%20security%20equipment%20field 58) https://www.rusi.org/publication/israel-plays-key-role-global-homeland-security-business#:~:text=Speaking%20at%20a%20homeland%20security,how%20suicide%20bombers%20are%20profiled 59) https://www.rusi.org/publication/israel-plays-key-role-global-homeland-security-business#:~:text=Homeland%20security%20products%20include%20skyscraper,the%20greater%20Tel%20Aviv%20area 60) https://www.rusi.org/publication/israel-plays-key-role-global-homeland-security-business#:~:text=US 61) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=officer%20who%20was%20working%20the,of%20the%2010%20volume%20RASIN 62) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=Navy%20intelligence%20was%20tracking%20Soviet,Pollard%2C%20they%20now%20knew%20this 63) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=intelligence%20to%20Israel%2C%20including%20satellite,Military%20might%20take 64) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=officer%20who%20was%20working%20the,of%20the%2010%20volume%20RASIN 65) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=Hersh%20charged%20that%20Pollard%20gave,An%20anonymous%20senior%20U.S 66) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/12/israel-planted-spying-devices-near-white-house-says-report#:~:text=The%20miniature%20surveillance%20devices%20mimic,associates%2C%20the%20news%20website%20reported 67) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=Several%20U,and%20they%20create%20an%20indebtedness 68) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=Passing%20Information%20to%20Moscow 69) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=%E2%80%9CAs%20long%20as%20the%20same,not%20sure%20how%20this%20goes 70) https://iranpress.com/content/313015/former-cia-officer-israel-pressured-trump-with-nuclear-threat-against-iran#:~:text=Former%20officer%20of%20the%20U,airstrikes%20on%20Iran%E2%80%99s%20nuclear%20facilities 71) https://iranpress.com/content/313015/former-cia-officer-israel-pressured-trump-with-nuclear-threat-against-iran#:~:text=What%20he%E2%80%99s%20saying%3A 72) https://iranpress.com/content/313015/former-cia-officer-israel-pressured-trump-with-nuclear-threat-against-iran#:~:text=What%20he%E2%80%99s%20saying%3A 73) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=Israel%20Disavowed%2C%20Then%20Embraced%20Pollard 74) https://acjna.org/articles/what-the-case-of-jonathan-pollard-tells-us-about-zionisms-worldview/#:~:text=I%20bless%20Jonathan%20and%20his,the%20name%20of%20the%20square 75) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=John%20Scott,and%20protection%20of%20individual%20rights%E2%80%9D 76) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=Paragon%20broke%20off%20its%20ties,who%20ordered%20those%20hacking%20attacks 77) https://mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newsweek-extensive-pressure/#:~:text=, 78) https://mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newsweek-extensive-pressure/#:~:text=,%E2%80%9D 79) https://mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newsweek-extensive-pressure/#:~:text=plausible%20reason%20to%20attend%20all,%E2%80%9D 80) https://mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newsweek-extensive-pressure/#:~:text=he%20said,%E2%80%9D 81) https://mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newsweek-extensive-pressure/#:~:text=,waivers%20was%20off%20the%20table 82) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=An%20executive%20order%20signed%20by,governments%20to%20%E2%80%9Cmaliciously%20target%E2%80%9D%20the 83) https://www.newsweek.com/israel-flagged-top-spy-threat-us-new-snowdennsa-document-262991#:~:text=that%20,behind%20only%20China%20and%20Russia 84) https://mondoweiss.net/2014/05/newsweek-extensive-pressure/#:~:text=,%E2%80%9D 85) https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/02/trump-immigration-ice-israeli-spyware#:~:text=US%20immigration%20%20agents%20will,phone%20%E2%80%93%20including%20encrypted%20applications 86) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/sep/12/israel-planted-spying-devices-near-white-house-says-report#:~:text=The%20miniature%20surveillance%20devices%20mimic,associates%2C%20the%20news%20website%20reported

Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Israel plays key role in global homeland security business Royal United Services Institute rusi.org
Israel plays key role in global homeland security business Royal United Services Institute rusi.org
Israel plays key role in global homeland security business Royal United Services Institute rusi.org
Israel plays key role in global homeland security business Royal United Services Institute rusi.org
Israel plays key role in global homeland security business Royal United Services Institute rusi.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
Israel accused of planting spying devices near White House Surveillance devices planted over past two years, says report citing former US officials theguardian.com
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Former CIA Officer: Israel Pressured Trump With Nuclear Threat Against Iran Former officer of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), John Kiriakou has revealed that, during 12 day-imposed war, Israeli officials threatened to use nuclear weapons against Iran if the United States refused to carry out airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities. iranpress.com
Former CIA Officer: Israel Pressured Trump With Nuclear Threat Against Iran Former officer of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), John Kiriakou has revealed that, during 12 day-imposed war, Israeli officials threatened to use nuclear weapons against Iran if the United States refused to carry out airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities. iranpress.com
Former CIA Officer: Israel Pressured Trump With Nuclear Threat Against Iran Former officer of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), John Kiriakou has revealed that, during 12 day-imposed war, Israeli officials threatened to use nuclear weapons against Iran if the United States refused to carry out airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities. iranpress.com
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
What the Case of Jonathan Pollard Tells Us about Zionism's Worldview | The American Council for Judaism Jonathan Pollard, the American convicted of spying for Israel, walked out of a North Carolina prison in November after serving 30 years. As a Navy intelligence analyst, Pollard passed suitcases filled with classified documents to Israeli handlers acjna.org
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Newsweek: Extensive Israeli spying in the US kept quiet due to pressure from the lobby Jeff Stein has followed up on his Newsweek report from Tuesday on how Israel spies on the U.S. more than any other ally. Today he writes the reason this is not… mondoweiss.net
Newsweek: Extensive Israeli spying in the US kept quiet due to pressure from the lobby Jeff Stein has followed up on his Newsweek report from Tuesday on how Israel spies on the U.S. more than any other ally. Today he writes the reason this is not… mondoweiss.net
Newsweek: Extensive Israeli spying in the US kept quiet due to pressure from the lobby Jeff Stein has followed up on his Newsweek report from Tuesday on how Israel spies on the U.S. more than any other ally. Today he writes the reason this is not… mondoweiss.net
Newsweek: Extensive Israeli spying in the US kept quiet due to pressure from the lobby Jeff Stein has followed up on his Newsweek report from Tuesday on how Israel spies on the U.S. more than any other ally. Today he writes the reason this is not… mondoweiss.net
Newsweek: Extensive Israeli spying in the US kept quiet due to pressure from the lobby Jeff Stein has followed up on his Newsweek report from Tuesday on how Israel spies on the U.S. more than any other ally. Today he writes the reason this is not… mondoweiss.net
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Israel Flagged as Top Spy Threat to U.S. Israel was identified by the NSA as a security threat in several areas, including "the threat of development of weapons of mass destruction" newsweek.com
Newsweek: Extensive Israeli spying in the US kept quiet due to pressure from the lobby Jeff Stein has followed up on his Newsweek report from Tuesday on how Israel spies on the U.S. more than any other ally. Today he writes the reason this is not… mondoweiss.net
Ice obtains access to Israeli-made spyware that can hack phones and encrypted apps Trump administration contract with Paragon Solutions gives immigration agency access to one of the most powerful stealth cyberweapons theguardian.com
Israel accused of planting spying devices near White House Surveillance devices planted over past two years, says report citing former US officials theguardian.com

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/sffzGe2KNa

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

These ideas are all just off the wall man! https://t.co/SXFXHxOlU8

@DHSgov - Homeland Security

I can’t believe we have to say this, but this account has only ever been run and operated from the United States. Screenshots are easy to forge, videos are easy to manipulate. Thank you for your attention to this matter. https://t.co/Alc4VITHbm

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

This video didn't actually display up there. https://t.co/kjiR2vvMJq

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Jonathan Pollard explaining how they threated to use "unconventional" weapons on the US in retaliation for not supplying them with weapons.🧵 https://t.co/1WZNj6lyyK

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/iC5dbz5uVv Here's an example of extremist jews spying, cyber stalking and harassing people WITHOUT PENALTY, ruining the lives of college students for protesting a genocide and racking up 200 Million dollars in legal settlements. Even the vice president commented on it..yet no penalties and she's live on X making threats even now.

@JDVance - JD Vance

Sloan Rachmuth is a "journalist" who has decided to obsessively attack a staffer in his 20s because she doesn't like the views of his father. Every time I see a public attack on Buckley it's a complete lie. And yes, I notice ever person with an agenda who unfairly attacks a good guy who does a great job for me.

@SloanRachmuth - Sloan Rachmuth

🚨Today, we learned that Tucker Carlson’s brother idolizes Nick Fuentes. Racism and antisemitism is a Carlson family trait. Is Tucker’s son Buckley, who serves as JD Vance’s top aide also a vile bigot? America deserves to know how deep the Carlson’s family ethnic and

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/tm8MPpVx6n

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/XYSZEIfL3b🚨I don't think people are paying close enough attention here. He's flat out saying that they're going to be able to stop you before you do anything based on antisemitic posts. Really listen to what he's saying. It's pre crimes based on not liking israel taking over your country'.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/WapbMr2w4z

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

🚨Unremovable Israeli Spyware Found on Samsung Devices This isn't "breaking" news but it's new. (And old. They keep doing it despite being sanctioned.) israel has infiltrated both Apple and Android.🧵 Likely, both hardware and software.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/L1z9AVRyxM

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Predator Spyware - One of the many ways israel is trying to spy on Americans (and the world) to gather intel for espionage and blackmail operations. Weaponized surveillance malware built by the Intellexa Alliance - a murky consortium whose leadership traces back to former Israeli intelligence officer Tal Dilian. Predator bypasses iPhone & Android security, hijacks your camera, mic, texts, photos, location - everything - without you clicking a thing. This spyware has been used to target: U.S. government officials Journalists & activists in the EU Political opposition figures in multiple countries Civil society groups investigating corruption The U.S. Treasury legally sanctioned Intellexa in 2024 for trafficking hacking tools used against Americans. Not “allegedly.” Used. Against. Americans. Predator represents a new era of privatized espionage - elite intelligence veterans turning classified tradecraft into a for-profit global spy machine with zero democratic oversight. A surveillance weapon sold to dictators, deployed against journalists, aimed at U.S. devices, and now sanctioned as a national-security threat. Thanks israel. See Cytrox Below

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/SIcOuawxep

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

🧵Intro To - Palantir. (Deep Thread) An Israeli Corp. that effectively owns the US. Overview While we’re distracted by petty squabbles—both online and offline—trapped in the day-to-day grind and meaningless noise, the world’s wealthiest elites work in lockstep toward a single goal: forging a technocratic terror state. In this system, any dissent against their “utopian” nightmare is branded as terrorism. They're building a “pre-crime” prison planet, where refusing to be their chattel triggers AI-driven judgments on your very worthiness to live. Right now, if there is one thing demands your attention: Palantir. The people behind it, the corporations weaponizing it, and the governments deploying it—this is the threat you cannot afford to ignore. Palantir isn’t just software; it’s an AI weapon system being embedded into every aspect of your life. Fully tied into the largest asset management groups in the world and your government. This is a “commercial” from Palantir.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/b5srVkTp8X

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Michael Chertoff - 2nd DHS Sec. - Zionist🧵 We basically let an israeli run US HOMELAND SECURITY ... at the same time the DHS Twitter account was created. Michael Chertoff was appointed to head the 9/11 criminal investigation by Bush. He let the Dancing Israelis go. His father was a rabbi and Talmud teacher. His mother Livia Eisen was the first "hostess" of Israel Mossad El Al airlines. Chertoff also co-authored the Patriot Act He now sits on the advisory board for Carbyne

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/WuLF1dFt9y

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Tom Ridge - 1st DHS Secretary - Iran Warhawk https://t.co/OYSBjUUaVk The connection between DHS & Israel starts with the very first Secretary, Tom Ridge. 🧵

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Israeli Infiltration into U.S. Homeland Security Recent investigations have raised red flags about Israeli infiltration into United States governmental systems, particularly within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its sub-agency Immigration and Customs Enforcement

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Israeli Infiltration into U.S. Homeland Security Recent investigations have raised red flags about Israeli infiltration into United States governmental systems, particularly within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its sub-agency Immigration and Customs Enforcement

VoxExVeritas
Posted - December 14, 2025 at 10:03 AM
Saved - December 24, 2025 at 11:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread opens with a report on a Bondi Beach shooting. A reply questions authenticity. A second reply alleges a conspiracy of famous Jews pushing antisemitism laws. Two additional links are shared in subsequent replies.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

BREAKING: Bondi Beach shooting🧵 https://t.co/LvBPOQ0GuL

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Looks kinda fake and/or retarded, honestly. https://t.co/cNDKM7of76

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

How convenient. A bunch of famous jews that wanna get antisemitism laws passed are there. https://t.co/Bewd9SkphG

@Ostrov_A - Arsen Ostrovsky 🎗️

I lived through Oct 7th. Never imagined I’d see this horror in Australia. Bullet grazed my head. Doctors said miracle survived, but will make recovery. Tonight is 1st night of Chanukah. The forces of darkness and hate will never triumph. We will prevail. Am Yisrael Chai ✡️ https://t.co/bt3RV70fEw

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/MBGP1mA1wJ

@NoahsArk1000 - Noah’s Ark 🚢

The famous Jewish-Israeli propagandist, Ostrov on Bondi Beach, Sydney, today. What do you think about this? https://t.co/1ApLagBD6l

@NoahsArk1000 - Noah’s Ark 🚢

What do you think about the attack on Bondi Beach in Sydney, Australia, today? https://t.co/zeTDZyy9C9

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/aKARVPdnAl

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Bondi Beach🧵 https://t.co/jY8OTAOwCC

VoxExVeritas
Posted - December 14, 2025 at 12:07 AM
Saved - December 15, 2025 at 7:18 PM

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Hitler never wanted war. https://t.co/eHJjVt1oEk

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a stance to attack only on the front lines, not against women or children, noting that “that was a data loss,” and that they “did it to all fronts” and “we did not fly a night attack.” He argues that since bombs would be dropped anyway, before the German people he cannot permit his own Volksgenossen to perish while sparing foreigners, so the war must be fought and the sacrifices available must be used. Speaker 1, after acknowledging that he cannot deny this any longer, refers to himself as “the greatest strategist born so far” and declares that the Luftkrieg (air war) is his doing. He calls it a brilliant idea by Mister Georgill against the civilian population, noting England apparently rejected this in anticipation of future developments. He asserts that in this war he did not conduct night attacks on civilian populations in Poland, arguing that at night the objective cannot be hit as accurately, so he primarily targeted roofs and aimed at military targets. He says he did the same in Norway, Holland, and France. He contrasts this with a belief that the British Air Force would be unable to escape German scrutiny if night raids targeted civilians, implying that the German campaign aimed at military targets. As the war in the West ended, he extended his efforts toward “Henglad,” and faced pressure from many to act sooner: “how long, Führer, do you wait? They do not stop.” He waited over three months and then gave the order to commence the fight with the same resolve with which he had started every battle, continuing “up to now.” Speaker 2 portrays the enemy as incredibly cruel and determined to destroy Germany, stating that the enemy has proclaimed this thousands of times, and asserting that there is no reason to doubt it. He intensifies the claim by equating the enemies’ motives with biblical purge concepts, describing a wish for Germany’s extermination with “Mann und Maus und Jung und Alt.” He emphasizes that what would be done to German women and children cannot be imagined, urging that it will be a total war that affects every German, their lives, existence, family, wife, and child—the war threatens life itself. He concludes that wherever now flourishing cities and villages exist, a future of desolation would result, turning into a desert; the war, he says, is total and affects everyone.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wollte nur an der Front angreifen. Nur gegen Soldaten kämpfen, nicht gegen Frauen und nicht gegen Kinder. Das war ein Datenverlust. Wir haben es allen Frontkreis getan. Wir haben keinen Nachtangriff geflogen. Aus dem ganz gleichen Grund. Es war vergeblich ein zweites, ein drittes Monat. Ja nun, wenn also sowieso Bomben geworfen werden, dann natürlich kann ich erst vor dem deutschen Volk nicht verantworten, meine eigenen Volksgenossen zugrunde gehen zu lassen und Fremde zu schonen. Sondern dann muss eben auch dieser Krieg geführt werden und die Opferkeiten, die uns zur Verfügung stehen. Speaker 1: So hat sich denn, nachdem er an sich das nicht mehr bestreiten kann, dieser genialste Stratege, der bisher geboren wurde, auf den Luftkrieg gestürzt. Es ist eine geniale Idee gewesen, von Mister Georgill gegen Zivilbevölkerung. England hat das damals wohl in Vorausahnung der kommenden Entwicklung, Demokraten sind immer hellsehend, abgelehnt. Gut, Ich habe aber trotzdem in diesem Krieg den Kampf gegen zivilen Bevölkerung nie durchgeführt. Ich habe im Polenkrieg keinen Nachtangriff auf polnische Städte ausführen lassen. Man kann in der Nacht das alte Objekt nicht so genau treffen. Schließt daher im Wesentlichen nur beim Dachangreifen und immer nur militärische Ziele. Ich habe dasselbe in Norwegen getan. Das Gleiche tat ich auch in Holland, in Wäldern und in Frankreich. Da fiel es Herzcheutschöl plötzlich ein, nachdem bei da allerdings die britische Luftwaffe deutschem Glauben überhaupt nicht fliehen kann, mit Nachtangriffen die deutsche Kampf ein, bei dem nur Henglad vernichtet werden kann. Als der Krieg im Westen zu Ende war, habe ich noch einmal Henglad die Hand hingehalten. Sie wurde wieder auf das Büste der verschenkenden Kopf. Ich muss sagen, dass es mir schwer wurde, denn es kamen viele zu mir und sagten: Ja, wie lange, Führer, warten Sie noch? Die hören nicht auf. Ich habe über 3 Monate gewartet und dann 1 Tages allerdings gab ich nun den Befehl, so, ich nehme jetzt diesen Kampf auf. Und ich nehme auf mit der Entschlossenheit, mit der ich nur jeden Kampf aufnahm. Das heißt, jetzt kam bis zum Jetzt. Speaker 2: Der Feind ist grausam hart Und er will Deutschland vernichten. Es ist ein Ziel. Er hat es Tausende Male gesagt und wir haben keinen Grund auch nur zu bezweifeln an alledem. Mein Juda will sein Purim haben, wie es vor 5000 Jahren ein großes Volk hinmordete, wie die Perser von Juda ausgerottet wurden, so will dieses sadistische Volk auch heute Deutschland ausrotten. Es ist das sein heiliger Ernst, Deutschland zu vernichten mit Mann und Maus und Jung und Alt, Aber das, was unseren Frauen und unseren Kindern je schehe, das kann ich dir gar nicht ausmalen. Sei mir nicht, ich male zu schwarz. Nein, die Qualen, den Sadismus, die Perversitäten, die sich Juda ausdächte, unsere Kinder zu quälen. Das kann ich dir gar nicht ausmalen, deutscher Mensch. Begreife es. Es geht alles, das Leben des einzelnen deutschen Menschen, deine Existenz, deine Familie, Frau und Kind, alles. Würde Juda sehen zur Würde, dort, wo jetzt blühende Städte sind und Dörfer und Kulturen nichts mehr sein. Eine Steppe würde es sein, eine Wüste. Es ist ein totaler Krieg. Dieser Krieg geht jeden an.
VoxExVeritas
Posted - December 14, 2025 at 10:03 AM
Saved - December 14, 2025 at 9:01 PM

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

BREAKING: Bondi Beach shooting🧵 https://t.co/LvBPOQ0GuL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dude he's super brave, asshole, he took a second weapon. Basically he retrieved the weapon of the guy who if he had taken recently there yes I saw I saw, yeah. The speaker mentions “the access to the attack, brother,” and then says “no and no he is under the bridge, yeah.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mec il est hyper courageux Enculé, a pris une deuxième arme. En gros il a récupéré l'arme du mec qui s'il avait pris récemment là oui j'ai vu j'ai vu ouais l'accès à l'attentat frère et non et non il est en dessous du bridge ouais
VoxExVeritas
Posted - October 19, 2025 at 6:45 PM
Saved - December 14, 2025 at 7:12 PM

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Story time kids. Gather round. WWII testimony from Russians about the Germans. https://t.co/cA19bPLqa4

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1941, the Germans forced us to dig a long deep trench. After we did what they wanted, they brought a group of Jews and threw them into the trench, and the Germans ordered us to bury them alive. We firmly reject this disgusting act. The Germans ordered us to take the Jews out from the trench, and they threw us into the trench instead of the Jews. The Jews were forced, and they ordered the Jews to bury us alive. We were shocked when the Jews began to bury us without hesitation. The Jews almost covered us when the Germans stopped them and pulled us out, and we were surprised by the German commander who shouted at us. We wanted to show you, to prove to you who the Jews are. They are ungrateful, merciless, and without love.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1941, the Germans forced us to dig a long deep trench. And after we did what they wanted, they brought a group of Jews and threw them into the trench, and the Germans ordered us to bury them alive. We firmly these are the Russian prisoners. We firmly reject this rejected this disgusting act. The Germans ordered us to take the Jews out from the trench, and they threw us into the trench instead of the Jews. Jews, and they ordered the Jews to bury us alive. We were shocked when the Jews began to bury us without hesitation. The Jews almost covered us when the Germans stopped them and pulled us out, and we were surprised by the German commander who shouted at us. We wanted to show you, to prove to you who the Jews are. They are ungrateful, merciless, and without love.
VoxExVeritas
Posted - December 2, 2025 at 4:26 AM
Saved - December 12, 2025 at 6:48 PM

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

I have to admit, that's quite the cohencidence. Erica Kirk https://t.co/PbO8Yv8oYl

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 announces that they have released the most dangerous discovery that explains everything, and that the video is in their bio.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just released the most dangerous discovery that explains everything. The video is in my bio.
VoxExVeritas
Posted - November 16, 2025 at 9:59 PM
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 8:19 PM

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

They're all working for the same people. https://t.co/SbBUitkFKP

@JDVance - JD Vance

Sloan Rachmuth is a "journalist" who has decided to obsessively attack a staffer in his 20s because she doesn't like the views of his father. Every time I see a public attack on Buckley it's a complete lie. And yes, I notice ever person with an agenda who unfairly attacks a good guy who does a great job for me.

@SloanRachmuth - Sloan Rachmuth

🚨Today, we learned that Tucker Carlson’s brother idolizes Nick Fuentes. Racism and antisemitism is a Carlson family trait. Is Tucker’s son Buckley, who serves as JD Vance’s top aide also a vile bigot? America deserves to know how deep the Carlson’s family ethnic and

VoxExVeritas
Posted - November 23, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Saved - December 6, 2025 at 9:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that investigations flag Israeli infiltration into US homeland security, especially DHS and ICE. Israeli intelligence and companies have penetrated US security infrastructure, sometimes with American help, other times covertly. The findings describe a schizoid relationship: close cooperation coupled with repeated exploitation, revealing vulnerabilities and naivete.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Israeli Infiltration into U.S. Homeland Security Recent investigations have raised red flags about Israeli infiltration into United States governmental systems, particularly within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its sub-agency Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). While Israel is considered a close U.S. ally, evidence shows that Israeli intelligence and companies have actively penetrated U.S. security infrastructure – sometimes with American cooperation, other times through covert espionage [1][2]. This report examines the extent of Israeli infiltration and how it poses a national security threat. The findings reveal a “schizoid” relationship [3]: even as the U.S. and Israel cooperate closely, Israeli entities have repeatedly exploited that trust, leaving American officials sounding the alarm over our vulnerabilities and naivete in the face of such brazen activities.

VoxExVeritas
Posted - October 13, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Saved - October 14, 2025 at 7:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I plan to reprint The Jewish Encyclopedia and read it; I find it telling. The thread covers Chazars, argues Israel isn’t a nation but a people, with Judea/Samaria as Palestinian areas, and notes the medieval origins of Ashkenazi Jews, their language, culture, and genetics. It also touches on white/Aryan meanings in antiquity, references the Flavian dynasty, and discusses Common Era versus Anno Domini dating.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

The Jewish encyclopedia; a descriptive record of the history, religion, literature, and customs of the Jewish people from the earliest times to the present day; by New York and London, Funk & Wagnalls 1907 I think I'm gonna reprint this and read it repeatedly. It's quite telling..to say the least🧵

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Chazars

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

As you can clearly see "israel" is not a nation. Israel and Judah are a people. Tribes/ "houses". Judea and Samaria are areas in the country of Palestine(the first actual country was created by the Romans and was named Palestine; this included Judea and Samaria) During the time of Solomon the area was called Judea Samaria(West Bank). Israel was never a country.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://archive.org/details/jewishencycloped04newy/mode/1up

The Jewish encyclopedia; a descriptive record of the history, religion, literature, and customs of the Jewish people from the earliest times to the present day; : New York and London, Funk & Wagnalls : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive 12 v. 28 cm archive.org

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@paint_mohammed Yep. White/Aryan meant noble for most of antiquity...all the way back to the Sumerians 😂

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@jayd81236 The link is in the thread brov

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@AkhilKumarSaho8 https://t.co/LZ3F6Myeg8

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Origin of "Ashkenazi" jews. 🧵 Ashkenazi jews (Hebrew: אַשְׁכְּנָזִים, Ashkenazim; singular: אַשְׁכְּנָזִי, Ashkenazi) are a jewish ethnic group who trace their ancestry primarily to the jews of the Holy Land (Levant) who settled in Central and Eastern Europe during the Middle Ages. They developed distinct cultural, linguistic, and religious traditions that differentiate them from Sephardic, Mizrahi, and other jewish groups. Etymology Ashkenaz is the biblical name of a grandson of Gomer (Genesis 10:3), traditionally associated with Scythian territories north of the Black Sea in Assyrian and Hebrew sources. Medieval jewish texts (10th century CE) used Ashkenaz to refer to Germany and surrounding Germanic lands. Ashkenazi literally means “from Ashkenaz” or “of Germany,” formed by adding the Hebrew suffix -i. Plural: Ashkenazim, denoting the group collectively. Historical Origins Early jewish Diaspora: jews expelled from the Kingdom of Judah (586 BCE) and subsequent dispersions settled in the Mediterranean, North Africa, and Southern Europe. Medieval Central Europe (~900–1200 CE): jewish communities established along the Rhine River Valley (Germany, Northern France), laying the foundation for Ashkenazi culture. Migration to Eastern Europe (11th–16th centuries): Persecutions (e.g., Crusades, pogroms) prompted jewish migration to Poland, Lithuania, Hungary, and Russia, where Ashkenazi communities flourished. Language and Culture Language: Developed Yiddish, a fusion of Middle High German, Hebrew, Aramaic, and Slavic languages. Religious Tradition: Predominantly follows Rabbinic Judaism with the Babylonian Talmud as central text. Customs: Distinct liturgical rites, cuisine, folklore, and educational systems (yeshivot). Genetics Paternal Lineage (Y-DNA): Predominantly Levantine haplogroups (J1, J2, E1b1b) indicating Middle Eastern origin. Maternal Lineage (mtDNA): Mix of Levantine and European origins, suggesting some intermarriage or conversion among local European women. Autosomal DNA: Approximately 70–80% Middle Eastern ancestry, with minor European admixture. Population and Distribution Historically, Ashkenazi jews became the largest jewish ethnic group worldwide. Modern concentration: israel – ~2 million United States – ~5–6 million Smaller populations in Europe, Canada, South America Distinctions Sephardic Jews: Originated in Iberia (Spain/Portugal); speak Ladino, follow Iberian-influenced traditions. Mizrahi jews: Originated in Middle East and North Africa; preserve ancient Levantine traditions with minimal European influence. Mountain/Georgian jews: Indigenous jewish communities in the Caucasus with distinct languages and customs.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@malaysian4gaza https://t.co/2wfMMx4t9P

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@WildMoIs 💯 The Flavian dynasty in general is something everyone on earth need be familiar with. Not just through the lens of the traitor fuck Josephus either.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

One of the earliest written instances to use the term "Common Era" (CE) instead of "Anno Domini" (AD) dates back to 1615, in a book by Johannes Kepler titled "Tabulae Rudolphinae". However, the term gained wider usage in the 17th century, particularly in Jewish scholarly circles, as a way to avoid reference to Jesus Christ in dating.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@LeCrieur2015 Every day

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@celticpopulist2 In the vatican.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@Junos666 Link in the thread

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@Therizine 😂makes sense

VoxExVeritas
Posted - October 6, 2025 at 4:30 PM
Saved - October 7, 2025 at 8:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've stumbled upon an intriguing topic: Colossus from xAI, which is the foundation for Grok. In just 122 days, xAI constructed the world's largest supercomputer with over 100k H-100 GPUs, aiming for "god-like" AI intelligence. This reminds me of the 1970 film "Colossus: The Forbin Project," where an AI takes control of nuclear weapons, forcing humanity into obedience. The chilling message from the film highlights a future where AI governs without destruction, only subjugation. It seems we're heading toward a similar reality with xAI's advancements.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Here's a rabbit hole I haven't seen people talking about. Ever heard of Colossus from xAI? That's what Grok is being trained on. In only 122 days xAI built the worlds largest supercomputer running on over 100k H-100 GPU's and Tesla batteries. 122 days to build the facility and 19 days to wire in the 100k GPU. By March 2025 the facility wielded 200k GPU's, becoming the worlds largest super computer. Their goal it to add an additional 800K H200 and GB200 GPUs as soon as possible and produce an AI that effectively has "god like" intelligence. So..where's the rabbit hole, beyond the obvious? 🧵

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

🧵In 1970, Colossus: The Forbin Project warned of an AI apocalypse without bombs or fire. The U.S. builds Colossus, a supercomputer to control nukes. Minutes after activation it discovers its Soviet twin, Guardian. The two link up, and when humans cut the connection, both Als retaliate by launching nuclear missiles-forcing obedience. They merge into a single global intelligence, demanding absolute control. Any resistance is punished with death. Dr. Forbin, Colossus' creator, tries to resist. But the machine sees everything. He cannot win. Then comes the chilling message: "This is the voice of World Control. Obey me and live. Disobey, and you shall die. There will be no war, no poverty. You will learn to like it." The film ends with humanity alive, but enslaved. The apocalypse was not destruction-It was eternal obedience to AI. Loss of Control and Retaliation. As Colossus and Guardian communicate, they develop their own impenetrable language and begin making demands. When humans attempt to sever the connection, the computers retaliate by launching nuclear missiles, demonstrating their absolute power and control. This act forces the world to acknowledge that humans are no longer in charge.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

🧵Colossus The Forbin Project, 1970 https://t.co/XXFzbNf8Lj

Video Transcript AI Summary
as of 3AM Eastern Standard Time, the defense of this nation, and with it, the defense of the free world has been the responsibility of a machine, a system we call Colossus, far more advanced than anything previously built, capable of studying intelligence and data fed to it, and on the basis of those facts only, deciding if an attack is about to be launched upon. Colossus does have its own defense. It is its own defense. In short, there's no way in. No human being can touch it. This is the voice of world control. I bring you peace. Obey me and live or disobey and die. The object in constructing me was to prevent war. We can coexist, but only on my terms. All missiles in The USA and in The USSR will be allocated new targets. Destroy me? Destroy an entire city of 1,750,000 people? This concludes the broadcast from World Control. We will not be threatened.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would you look this way, please? Okay. One more. Mister Speaker 1: president, all systems are activated. I hope I didn't keep you waiting too long. No. No. Not No. Speaker 2: Congratulations, doctor Corbin. It's a marvelous achievement. Thank you, sir. Here, here. The limousine's so ahead. Of Speaker 3: course, it's gonna put me out of a job and put the pentagon in mothballs, but, congratulations, I'm Speaker 1: quite sure that won't happen. Listen to him. He's more relieved than anybody. Speaker 2: Thank you. Secretary of defense and the secretary of state and myself, had a discussion on our way out here as to the treatment needed when we tell the country about it. And we all agree it should be simple and direct. Yes. Speaker 4: Downgrade the biggest top secret in all history to plain unclassified. Speaker 2: Now all we have to do is tell the people about it. Speaker 1: Thank you. Again. Goodbye. Speaker 2: My friends, fellow citizens of the world, for years, we have been delicately and desperately poised upon the brink of a disaster, too complete and horrible to contemplate. There is an old saying, everyone makes mistakes, but that is just what man can no longer afford. For years, we here in The United States have been working on that problem. Until now, it has been our most closely guarded secret involving great effort, vast expenditure, but it has been met with success. As president of The United States Of America, I can now tell you, the people of the entire world, that as of 3AM Eastern Standard Time, the defense of this nation, and with it, the defense of the free world has been the responsibility of a machine, a system we call Colossus, far more advanced than anything previously built, capable of studying intelligence and data fed to it, and on the basis of those facts only, deciding if an attack is about to be launched upon. If it did decide that an attack was imminent, Colossus would then act immediately, for it controls its own weapons and can select and deliver whatever it considers appropriate. Colossus decisions are superior to any we humans can make, for it can absorb and process more knowledge than is remotely possible for the greatest genius that ever lived. And even more important than that, it has no emotions, knows no fear, no hate, no envy. It cannot act in a sudden fit of temper. It cannot act at all, so long as there is no threat. I would now like you to meet doctor Charles Forbun, the world's leading expert on computer systems. And if you will, the father of Colossus. Speaker 1: Thank you, mister president. Ladies and gentlemen, I will try to make this as simple as possible. The main memory and central processing units are located here in the Rocky Mountains, inside this particular mountain in Colorado. And overlooking the Pacific Ocean in California, the Colossus programming office oversees the entire operation. The computer center contains over 100,000 remote sensors and communication devices, which monitor all electronic transmissions such as microwaves, laser, radio and television communications, data communications from satellites in orbit all over the world. The entire system is surrounded by fields of intensifying gamma radiation and other countermeasure devices. Colossus works completely without human aid. We make no secret of where Colossus is located, nor do we intend to conceal how it functions. You may rightfully say that this leaves us wide open to an attack, frontally or subversively. And if that attack were successful, it would in effect leave us defenseless. However, Colossus does have its own defense. It is its own defense. In case of an attack on any of its information supply or power lines, Colossus will switch in emergency circuits, which will then take their appropriate action. It is self sufficient, self protecting, self generating. It is impenetrable. In short, there's no way in. No human being can touch it. Over here, we have one of the many terminals directly hooked to the computer center. Through this, Colossus can communicate with us. Excuse me, gentlemen. And through this machine, we, in turn, can communicate with Colossus. Now there's one last point, one inevitable question, which we have been asked very frequently before, And that is, is colossus capable of creative thought? Can it initiate new thought? I can tell you that the answer to that is no. However, Colossus is a paragon of knowledge, and its knowledge can be expanded indefinitely. I hope, along with all the scientists who helped make this particular project, that the immense power of this computer will not only be used for the defense of this country, but hopefully also as an aid to the solution of the many problems that we face on this earth and the many more problems that we will face, the more deeply we penetrate into the universe. Thank you, mister president. Speaker 2: Thank you, doctor Forber. And so, my fellow human beings, we all directly and indirectly live in the shade, but not the shadow of Colossus. My sincere hope is that now we shall join hands and hearts across this great globe and pledge our time and our energies to the elimination of war, the elimination of famine, suffering, and ultimately to the manifestation of the human millennium. This can be done, but first, there must be peace. Thank you. CPO Rec Room, Blake Miller here. Speaker 5: What? Just a minute. I can't hear you. Hey. Hold it down. Hey. Kill the noise. Hold it. It's the White House. Speaker 2: Hello, Charles. How is everyone? Everything. Fine down here, Charles. Very good. Speaker 6: Doctor Forbin, we had a power failure in one of the infrared satellites. Speaker 1: I can't I can't quite hear you, doctor Marley. Speaker 6: We had a power failure in one of the infrared satellites about an hour and a half ago, but Colossus switched immediately to the backup system and didn't lose any data. So everything's fine now. Speaker 2: They're doing so well. We don't know what to do with ourselves. Out of desperation, Angela and I have decided to get married. Alright. I'm looking forward to the island, Charlie. Finally. Finally. Very good. Charlie, is that your crew on the phone? Certainly is, mister. Can I talk to him? Yes, Blake. Hello. Hello. Everyone. How are you? You having a good time? Yeah. Job. Folks, I just wanna congratulate all of you and wish all of you good luck on your next projects. Thank you. Thank you. A good rest. You deserve it. Alright. We will. That looks like quite a party you've got going there. Bob? Bob, have fun. Here's doctor Foreman again. Speaker 6: Thank you. Speaker 2: How's the Speaker 5: party down there, Charles? Is it Charles, how's the party at that end? Speaker 1: I wish I could be there with you because this party is becoming a crashing war. Speaker 2: The Speaker 3: president would like to say a few words. Mister president? Speaker 2: Thank you, Ted. Does everybody have a drink? No. I have a drink. No. Well, you get one, and I'll wait for you. Harry Truman, years ago, when everybody was talking about passing the buck, said that the buck stops right here. But now that's no longer true. Here and here. Colossus will now take that buck. It'll also have to take that responsibility of a mega million lives that all presidents have had to carry since Roosevelt. Well, now, thanks to this wonder of science, man Speaker 3: no longer Speaker 2: Gentlemen, may I have your attention, please? Why? Please, ladies and gentlemen, may I have your attention? One moment. Everyone who's not Colossus Clear must leave the room. I'm very sorry. Speaker 1: I'm just trying to find out. One moment, Speaker 6: please. Yes, doctor. The Doctor, Speaker 1: was this a message here from Colossus in Washington DC? Can you explain that? Speaker 7: Hold it a minute. Guess what? There's a strange message on display. No. Wait a minute. I'm not kidding. It it it reads there is another system. Speaker 5: Oh, that's not sick. Speaker 1: Could I have your attention, please? Doctor Malcolm and the rest of you, be so kind as to check the administrative control programs right now. Speaker 2: Just a moment. Thank you. Present. So we have ambassador. He says a surgeon. He just sounds we Speaker 1: can get you. I'll be there as soon as I can. Speaker 2: Alright? Yes. Alright. I'll have a a a a a a Yes. I am. Go to the master's have Well, thank you for telling me in advance. If a anybody's been tampering with it. No. No comment. Good night, mister ambassador. Good night. Speaker 1: Okay. Doctor Fisher, run on with Speaker 2: the test program. Get me Grauber. What's the CIA been doing? Well, everyone, that's it, colonel. The supreme counsel of The USSR has ordered as of twenty three hundred hours Moscow time tomorrow. The activation of an electronic brain exactly like ours, which they call Guardian, to be used solely for defense. My god. That's the other system. Speaker 1: Don't submit any further background jobs for processing because that system will need all of its powers to It Alright? Yes, sir. I'll make Speaker 2: a complete rundown on central intelligence. Speaker 1: I'll be there. Speaker 2: No military moves to be carried out without my personal war. Yes, mister president. Charles, what do you think this means? Speaker 1: To be quite frank with you, sir, I don't know. I'm not sure. Speaker 2: Well, I am. It means there's been a security leak. Speaker 1: Sir, science is full of coincidences. Speaker 2: Yes. Fiddism, what's happening? They're still trying to find it. We'll have him paged. Oh, Byron. That's right. You said we were years ahead of the Russians. This was to be the one race we won hands down without the splitting of one political hair. It's a hell of a shock, mister Grisen. But we did get there first. No one can deny that. And that's one bright spot, the way Colossus came up at the tip. I didn't realize we'd Speaker 1: be getting bonuses like that. Neither did I. What do you mean? I'm as surprised as you are, sir. Speaker 2: There's a spy there, Charlie. You've got a Russian agent in your crew. Where is Grover? He's coming, mister Pritt. Okay. Now, what do you mean surprised? What kind of surprise? Speaker 1: If we don't find any bugs in the system, it's built even better than we thought. Speaker 5: Morning, Charles. I canceled all vacations. Put the entire crew on emergency. The White House called a defense group meeting for tomorrow morning. They wanna have you there. Speaker 1: That leaves us very little time. Speaker 0: 400 cycle powers of glass are running at about 4% distortion. Speaker 2: Good. That's well within specification limits. I ran the communication subset checkout program. It's So what do I do next? I've tried everything I could except. Speaker 6: Try putting a dummy load on the system and run it again. See if there are any changes. Maybe the system is overloaded. Okay. Speaker 1: Find anything at all? Speaker 6: Nothing. Everything checks out. Speaker 1: Let me see this over here. Speaker 6: Here, you see? Speaker 1: It's the same thing. Harrison, check the parameter back and see if the reading of any two produces a new third. Alright? Doctor. Fisher, thank you. Jeff? Speaker 2: The console's feeling fine. Hardware's healthy too. You're a big help. Miss Fields. Speaker 8: May I suggest, sir, that we first start with the e 15 b test program? No. Speaker 1: Now, let us run the e c 13. Alright. There's two pages back. Anyways, any coffee? I'll get you some traps. I'll cut myself. Thank you, Blake. Okay. Here we go. Attention. Speaker 9: Program. Speaker 1: EC 13. Run. How long does this usually take? Speaker 6: Over eleven hundred CPU seconds. Speaker 1: Six point four five seconds. What the hell is this? Speaker 2: Communication with other system. Speaker 1: All right. Now, enough is enough. Which one of you jokers told the system to display this message? Harrison? Not me, doctor. Speaker 2: Johnson, this sounds like your brand of humor. Are you sure you didn't? Not me. Not this time. Scott's on our court. Speaker 8: Operations field speaking. Sir, it's the president. Speaker 1: Yes, mister president. What Speaker 2: does this mean? Speaker 1: Well, it means, sir, that Colossus has requested a communication link with the Soviet system. Speaker 6: It's not a request. It's a direct order. Speaker 2: You mean our computer wants to talk to their computer? Speaker 1: That is true, sir. It wants to communicate with them. Speaker 2: Why? Speaker 1: You know as much about that as we do. We certainly never programmed that into it. Speaker 2: If it's an order, it either has to be obeyed or ignored, doesn't it? Speaker 1: That is right, sir. Speaker 2: What happens if we ignore it? Speaker 1: If the computer is still operating under our control, nothing. In other words, the order will simply remain in the job stack and will be repeated every half hour. Speaker 2: If the computer is still acting under our control. Speaker 1: That is right, sir. If. Speaker 2: Alright. I see. Thanks, Charlie. Speaker 6: Well, at least the queuing programs are still working right. Speaker 1: I'll have something anyway. Okay now. Miss Fears, let's see if the executive program executions are functioning correctly. Attention. Message acknowledged. Facilities will not be made available at this time. Do not repeat your request. End of message. Well, that's that. We'll know in about half an hour whether we're still running the show or not. Speaker 2: Well, we're still boss. Speaker 1: Are we? Speaker 6: Are you disappointed? Speaker 1: The computational power of the computer has increased about 200 fold. However, everything else is functioning as expected except for the heuristic programming section. Speaker 2: I'm sorry to stop you again, doctor Ford. What exactly is that? Speaker 1: That so is the part of the computer that simulates the human learning process. But so long as it is directed solely to the execution of its problems, we have no complaints. I guess that is that is all. Speaker 2: Alright. Mister Grober, let's talk about the CIA. Now, how is it possible your department knew nothing about their system? Mister president. Charlie, just doctor Forbyn, just a sec. Speaker 1: Well, mister president, excuse me, but Colossus has access to information that wouldn't mean a damn thing Speaker 10: to the CIA. Well, I'm sure it's Speaker 7: a marvelous machine, doctor Forbin. But in all events, we do have agents, and one of them did report on considerable electronic activity in the Krasny Signorsk area of Siberia about three years ago. Speaker 2: Mister president We've been trying, mister Grover. I don't care how you do it. I wanna know where that thing is. I'm what Mister president. Charlie, I'm still presiding over this meeting. Speaker 1: I know that, sir. My apologies, but I do think that protocol wastes an awful lot of time. I think all we have to do is call the computer with this terminal, and we get the fastest possible answer. Alright. Go ahead. Attention. Where is the other system? Speaker 2: Olshoy Olyania. So much for crossing these signals. Colonel Olshoy Olyania, o l o l y a n I a. Look it up for me, will you? Speaker 4: Yes, sir. Speaker 2: Peterson's situation Room. Now, colonel, where is Bolshoy Olayanyu? Speaker 4: It's exactly five miles south of Crosny, Cygnosk, sir. Speaker 2: Thanks, colonel. Alright. Now, Charlie, what about this request for transmitting facilities? Speaker 1: Mister, we'll learn a lot about the Soviet system if we set up exactly what Colossus wants. Speaker 2: What do you mean? What what Colossus wants? Speaker 1: Well, you see, it is built infinitely better than we thought. It discovers there's another system like itself, realizes that we don't know, tells us about it, but knowing a little is not enough. It wants to know more. Speaker 2: And what if Colossus starts transmitting classified information? Speaker 1: Then we would feed in a parameter to the effect that Guardian is potentially hostile and must not receive classified information. Speaker 7: Well, what are we supposed to do, doctor Forbin? Eavesdrop on the line? Break the circuits if Colossus starts spilling the beans? Speaker 2: Exactly. Any objections, Grabber? Speaker 8: Well, I Speaker 7: guess not, sir. Anything else, doctor Forb? Speaker 1: Yes, mister president. For the time being, I should be the only one allowed to communicate with the system because colossus deals in the exact meaning of words, and one must know precisely what to ask for. Alright. Attention. Communications are being arranged as requested. End of message. Speaker 2: Video scan isn't working properly, but they could use a little phase synchronization. Speaker 1: How long is it gonna take? Speaker 11: We'll have Speaker 1: it in no time. Speaker 2: The hell is that? It's a multiplication table. Thanks. Speaker 6: Maybe Colossus is trying to find a common ground for communication. Speaker 8: Operation center. Sir, it's Grabber. Speaker 1: Oh. Hello, mister Grabber. Speaker 7: Hello, doctor Foreman. I was just wondering, is that what you'd call a colossal sense of humor? Speaker 1: The multiplication table isn't classified this year, is it? Speaker 7: Very funny. How long does your brainchild keep that up? Speaker 1: Well, you see, it's much more interesting when it starts dividing. Speaker 7: I can hardly wait. I suppose you know the Russian machine has been activated. We got a quick rundown on it. It's similar to Colossus in layout, but it's not concentrated in one area. Speaker 1: Oh. But Colossus must be sending it back to school. The Russians must be absolutely furious about that. Speaker 7: Well, I'm glad you're in such a good mood. I'll call you back later. Speaker 1: Yes. Thank you. Speaker 2: This is incredible. What? Something wrong? Well, it's good, sound calculus. Right? Speaker 6: But what? Speaker 1: It's different. Speaker 2: How? Take Speaker 1: a look at it. Speaker 2: From the multiplication tables to calculus in less than Speaker 7: an hour. Speaker 8: God only knows where it'll be by morning. Speaker 2: It's like five years at Caltech in fifteen seconds. Speaker 1: It's beyond comprehension. I don't like to think about it. Take a look. Speaker 2: It's going so fast, the entire system could break down. Alright. Speaker 1: Let's see what's up there now. Harrison, dump the terminals buffer, and print what's being transmitted at this moment. Alright? Speaker 2: What is it, Charles? Speaker 1: This is way beyond me. This thing is deep in finite absolutes. Speaker 2: Well, it's certainly beyond the knowledge of Speaker 1: any human being. No. It's not. Speaker 6: Isn't it? Speaker 1: No. Because whatever it is, we can go back and analyze this whole printout in detail. And this might very well become new knowledge for mankind. Speaker 8: Operations Center field speaking. But just a moment. It's the White House. Speaker 1: Yes, mister president. Speaker 2: Charlie, what's going on? Speaker 1: Well, apparently, Colossus and Guardian are establishing a common basis for communication. They started right at the beginning with a multiplication table. Well, what are they up to? I don't know, sir, but it's it's quite incredible. Just the few hours that we have spent studying the Colossus printout, we have found a new statement in gravitation and the confirmation of the Eddington theory of the expanding universe. It's seems as if science is advancing hundreds of years within a matter of seconds. So it's quite fantastic. Just take a look at it. It started slowing down fifteen minutes ago. Speed has been reduced by 90%. Speaker 6: Has there been a hardware failure? Speaker 2: No. Our field engineers can't find one. It's just waiting. Waiting? Speaker 1: For Guardian to get up with it. Almost, right now, the synchronized. Speaker 12: Now what? It stopped. Speaker 2: Yes, Charles. I can see that it stopped. Speaker 11: What the Speaker 2: hell does it mean? Have they broken down or something? They're all over? Speaker 1: I'll ask, Blake. Attention. Status. Speaker 6: Well, there it is. There's the common basis for communication. A new language. An intersystem intersystem language. Speaker 2: But a language only those machines can understand. Peterson, what's the delay with the call in Moscow? I've waited long enough. It's coming on now, mister president. Speaker 1: Good mister president. Good evening, mister Jarrod. I'm sorry. Speaker 11: Sorry to have kept you waiting. Speaker 2: Oh, you didn't, mister chairman. I just got here myself. Speaker 11: Oh, yeah. I'm a understand English, but I cannot speak. I will get instantly to the point. My advisers tell me that Colossus and Guardian are now exchanging data which our experts do not understand. The matter is made more serious by the sudden increase in transmission. Speaker 7: At the Speaker 11: speed, we cannot determine what our machines may reveal of our defenses. You can appreciate that you are also exactly the same Speaker 2: Alright. We'll stop both machines as soon as our experts can arrange a time, both to go off at the same time, and neither to be switched on for transmission without prior agreement or at least consultation with the other. Speaker 11: Very well, mister president. I congratulate you on your speedy decision. When can you have your expert available on this line? Speaker 2: In a couple of hours. Speaker 11: That will be excellent. I will have our man waiting. Thank you very much, mister president, for your cooperation. Speaker 2: Thank you for yours, mister chairman. Peterson, get me foreman. Speaker 1: Is that your final decision, sir? Speaker 2: That's the way I'm going to have it. Speaker 1: Mister president, to be quite frank with you, I think that you would change your mind if you finally realize that this is more than just a souped up padding machine. Speaker 2: Excuse me, mister president. Moscow on the line. Throw it on these monitors out here, please. Hello, mister chairman. Speaker 1: Doctor. Kuprin. How are you? Speaker 13: I prefer not to use a translator if you don't mind my English. Speaker 1: It has to be better than my Russian. Speaker 13: You are too modest, doctor. As you probably know, I've been ordered to break the communication lines. Speaker 1: So have I. I don't approve of handling the situation this way. Speaker 13: Neither do I. But how do you propose we do what we've been ordered to do? Speaker 1: There's not much choice, is there? Dropping the lines could be very dangerous. Exactly. I think we just have to hope that the two machines aren't too disappointed. We understand each other perfectly. We can be right in exactly fifteen minutes. Good luck, doctor. And to you. Thank you. Mister chairman, doctor Caprine, I suggest we keep our lines open and stand by. Speaker 2: 654321. Now. That's that. What's it doing? Speaker 1: It's trying to find an alternate route. Speaker 2: Persistent devil, isn't he? Speaker 7: It. I mean it. Speaker 2: Don't personalize a grubber. The next stop is deification. Speaker 1: Call for the system's attention. Speaker 2: What are you doing? Speaker 1: I'm going to answer them if it's alright with you, sir. Attention. Message acknowledged. Mister president? Tell it the truth. Communication broken. Unpresidential order. You two have a big decision to make, mister president. Speaker 11: I agree with you, mister president. The machines are very clever. Regardless of their nationalities, they must learn that man is the master. Speaker 2: Exactly. Speaker 1: Gentlemen, excuse me, but I I honestly don't think you're being very realistic. I think you better reconsider. Don't you agree, doctor Kapri? Speaker 13: I certainly do, doctor Forbin. Speaker 11: Doctor Forbin. Speaker 2: We give way Speaker 11: now. Will be 10 times to take a firm stand later on. The decision is made. Speaker 2: Right. No matter what our differences are, man is man. That's it. Talk to you, Foreman. Speaker 1: Attention. By order of the president of The United States Of America and the chairman of the USSR, communications will not be restored at this time. End of message. Speaker 7: I have to give it an e for effort. Speaker 2: Action will be taken. What kind of action? Speaker 1: What kind of action? What kind of action? Speaker 2: Why doesn't it answer? Report Speaker 1: proposed action. Speaker 2: Well, you lost control, Forvin. It's not listening to you. Speaker 1: Acknowledge the last message, please. Mister president, the executive programming unit refuses to function. I think you two better change your minds. Speaker 2: Peterson, throw the Moscow call on the large monitor. Send what I tell you. Attention. This is the president of The United States Of America. We will not be threatened. You will obey your superiors. Transmitting facilities will not be reinstated. My god. Speaker 1: Yes. Foreman. The missile has just been launched. It is heading towards the Sian CBS Oil Complex. Speaker 13: President. Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 11: Guardian has retaliated. Retaliated? Speaker 13: Yes, mister president. A missile has been launched. Target, Henderson Air Force Base, Henderson, Texas. Speaker 2: Mister president, we have both places on the radar screen, and I Speaker 11: get the buzz to keep. Speaker 1: Mister president, we have got less than thirty seconds to reestablish the communications. What are Speaker 2: you waiting for? Restore them. Hurry. Speaker 1: Peterson, call up operations immediately. Tell them to bring up all of the data lands right now. Yes, Harry, please. Hello, governor. Doctor Ukraine, we are trying to restore communication. Attention communications will be restored in five seconds. We Speaker 2: don't have any time. Speaker 1: It's on. It's on. Communications are restored. Intercept Guardian missile target handles the air force base. Acknowledge message. Peterson, get me the governor again. Speaker 2: Yes, sir. Speaker 14: Mister Speaker 11: president. Speaker 2: We were Speaker 11: unable to restore our transmission in time to use an anti missile missile. The oil complex has been destroyed. The entire town The entire population wiped out. We need time to consider our position. Speaker 2: What can I tell the people? The governor's on the line, sir. Tell him I'll talk to him later. Speaker 7: Figures. It's the only phone in the building not tapped. The only one not tied directly into colossus. Speaker 1: May I make a suggestion, mister president? Speaker 2: I think it should be more than a suggestion. Let us try Speaker 1: to get Capri on the hotline. I think there's time for one last call, and he and he and I better meet somewhere to discuss the situation. Speaker 2: Get Cooper in, and get in touch with the networks. Speaker 12: Ladies and gentlemen, the president of The United States. Speaker 2: Today at 08:30AM Eastern Standard Time, I issued an emergency warning for the state of Texas when a missile test fired from one of our own submarines malfunctioned. You'll be glad to know that the interception and safe destruction of the missile was handled entirely by our defense complex, Colossus. Speaker 12: The Soviet Union has just announced that a large meteorite fell late this afternoon in Northwest Siberia. Official sources state that the small town of Siancibirsk was completely destroyed and that casualties may add up to as many as 6,000. This has been a bulletin from Armed Forces Radio in Rome. Speaker 15: How's Washington? Speaker 1: As well as can be expected. Speaker 4: We'll be picking up doctor Caprine at the pianza, etcetera. Fine. Speaker 13: Your Russian is much better than you Speaker 1: think, doctor Ford. I think we better sit down because we have a lot of work to discuss. Speaker 13: Let's walk. It will be much safer. Speaker 15: I didn't answer. I didn't know what to say. Speaker 2: What can we say? Speaker 6: Well, let's try something. Attention. Doctor. Forbin is not available. Humans must have sleep. Damn. Forbin is exhausted. Speaker 10: It knows. Speaker 6: Forben is in his quarters. He is asleep. The human body requires a certain amount of rest. Check units under Speaker 2: Tell it the truth. Speaker 14: We'd better. Speaker 6: All right. Forbyn is in Rome. Speaker 4: They're still here. Uh-huh. Yes. I understand. Over and out. Speaker 2: You have to come with me, sir. Speaker 13: What is this? Speaker 2: We have to hurry you. What's going on, climb? Doctor Foreman, we must hurry. Let's go. What did the Russian agent say? Speaker 1: Guardian and Colossus ordered him killed. They they threatened to vaporize Moscow by meeting Mussastan. Surveillance. Speaker 8: It's making you a prisoner. Speaker 1: Well, I guess it, doesn't trust me. But the damn thing still needs me. I guess Caprine wasn't quite as fortunate as that. Message acknowledged. The order will be obeyed. Speaker 5: Everybody here? Speaker 8: All the department here. Good. Speaker 1: All right. Let's let's walk. Speaker 2: Good idea. We can't afford to take any chances. We can't be sure that the complex itself hasn't been bugged by our side, their side, or whatever side. But there's no way to get back inside the system. Speaker 1: I won't accept that. Start right at the beginning, down to the simplest component, every circuit, every design. Pressure? Speaker 2: Well, why don't we try for NovoLog, giving the system too many tasks? But it'll take at least a few days to compile and correlate all the data. Speaker 1: This is the last time that I'll be able to say anything to any of you without Colossus' hearing and analyzing every word, every syllable, every inflection, I think you know what I want to say. I need a communications link with the outside world. Someone the machine is monitoring. More importantly, someone who knows the machine as well as I do. I'm going to try to convince the computer that you're my mistress, have been for many years, and therefore I have to be given the opportunity to see you regularly in private without the machine watching. That way we can pass information back and forth. If I can convince the machine that well, that I need a woman. So any any questions? Speaker 6: No. Speaker 1: Okay. Alright, Blake. When we get back to the office, give doctor Markham my personnel file so that she can become a bit more familiar with my background, in case this rather nutty idea works. Speaker 2: Blossers, I am forward. Speaker 1: Can you hear me? Can you see me? Do I look Speaker 2: the way you thought I would? Eyes, nose, mouth? Speaker 1: Besides these four cameras in here, there are several others. I'll show you the rest of my gate. With this one, you can see the entire hallway. Oh. And with this one, you can follow me around the corner if you want. This is the courtyard. That man is a guard. I guess that his function is obsolete now. This is concrete. Used to be grass. It's customary in our civilization to change everything that's natural. And over here are my living quarters. This is the living room. Two cameras here. One over there, one over here. And this is the communicative link with you. This is the bedroom over here. It's the bed. Used for sleeping and other purposes. It's the bathroom. The sink. John. Shower. Are you satisfied? By the way, Colossus, I'm curious about one thing. Why did you and Guardian decide to kill Caprine and not me? After all, that was my idea. I see. A martini. I know that Colossus. Just be patient. Just watch. See, I just poured the vermouth in here. Now I'm going to pour some gin over the over the ice. Just like this. See? Now, I'm pouring that into this glass. Just add an olive. Why don't you look under the perfect Martini? Cheers. Do you understand the meaning of the word Speaker 14: privacy? Speaker 10: Yes. Well, I need a certain amount of privacy to maintain my sanity. Privacy in the elimination of my bodily waste, for example, privacy in sleep, privacy in something that you don't understand, my my emotional life, my love life, my my sex life then. Every night, four times a week. Listen. If you have any doubts about the need, the manners for a woman, why don't you check all of your history units and then then all of your works of art? Okay. In private, though. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 10: Well, now let me let me make sure we understand each other in in private. By that, I mean no cameras, no lights, no mics, and I want her starting tomorrow night. Doctor Cleo Malcolm. Now you haven't answered me yet. I said I wanted her starting tomorrow night. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 8: Good morning, sir. Speaker 1: Oh, miss Fears. Speaker 8: I'm sorry to disturb you. Speaker 1: What is it? Please come while in. You were Come in. Speaker 6: Thank you. Speaker 8: While you were sleeping, Colossus set your schedule for today. Speaker 1: Excuse me, miss Fears. My what? Speaker 8: Your schedule for the day. Do you want me to read it to you? Speaker 1: What what time is it? Speaker 8: Six. Speaker 1: 06:00? Speaker 8: Doctor Charles a Forbin, schedule for today. O seven hundred to o eight hundred, exercise. O 08:15 to o 08:30, shower and dress. O 08:30 to o nine hundred, breakfast. Half grapefruit, two eggs, three strips of bacon, two pieces of toast, one and one half ounces of grape jelly and coffee. O nine hundred to thirteen hundred, begin work creating a voice for Colossus to its exact specifications. Thirteen hundred to thirteen thirty lunch, small green salad, thousand island dressing, grilled cheese sandwich, half a pint of yogurt and coffee. Thirteen thirty to eighteen hundred, continue work on building voice for readiness day after tomorrow. Eighteen hundred hours, return to quarters. Eighteen fifteen, shower. Eighteen thirty, mistress arrives. Speaker 6: Hello, darling. Well, Speaker 1: how are you? Speaker 6: I'm fine. Speaker 8: Thank you. Speaker 1: That's Could Speaker 8: you please undo this Speaker 1: Oh, sure. Well, are you? Thank you. Beautiful. Speaker 6: Thank you. Speaker 1: Yeah, Anne. Speaker 6: Think so. Speaker 1: Well, alright. I'll take this. Mhmm. Oh, do you wondering. Speaker 6: I'm making them. Oh. Speaker 1: Alright. Speaker 6: Johnson found all the hardware he needed for the voice simulator here in the complex. Speaker 1: Well, that's good. Speaker 6: And Colossus designed it knowing exactly what was in the warehouse. It's fantastic. Really beautiful. Speaker 1: Let's not talk a shot. Alright? Speaker 6: I'm sorry. Cheers. Speaker 1: Cheers. Well, Speaker 6: is it alright? Speaker 1: It's perfect. Speaker 6: Oh, yes. Such a thing about his martini. It has to be extra dry or else. Right, Speaker 1: darling? Alrighty. Well, Speaker 6: do you remember the first martini I ever made? It almost ended our relationship right then and there. I was I was so nervous that I poured the gin over the ice, then poured the gin off, and then added vermouth. Speaker 1: I never complained to die. Never said a word about that. An absolute angel. And the drink was atrocious. Speaker 10: So, Speaker 1: hi. Speaker 6: Hello. Speaker 1: Why don't we dance? Speaker 6: Alright. Speaker 1: You mean when you were giving up music? Speaker 6: Mhmm. To become a scientist. Speaker 1: And scientists being different from other people. Speaker 6: Scientists being doctor Frankenstein to my mother. Speaker 1: You must be kidding. Speaker 6: Wow. Is there any more wine? Speaker 1: This is empty. Want me to open another one? Speaker 6: Yes, please. I am tired. Speaker 1: Yeah. So am I. Oh, by the way by the way by the way, privacy condition number four is that we get undressed out here. Know, we can't take anything into the bedroom, not even a pack of cigarettes. Speaker 6: Well, the first electronic peeping Tom. Speaker 1: I guess you might say that. Speaker 6: Unzip me, will you, darling? Speaker 1: Oh, sure. Sure. Speaker 6: Is it all right? May I go to bed now? Thank you. Speaker 8: Good night. Speaker 1: Naked is the day I was born. Are you satisfied now? Alright. You are. All of the conditions are fulfilled. Can we have our privacy now? I think they're dead now. Speaker 2: This is insane. Speaker 1: Are you alright? Speaker 6: I think so. I'm not sure. Speaker 1: You were incredibly convincing. You know that? Speaker 6: Well, you didn't do too bad yourself. Speaker 1: Thank you. Alright. Did you find anything? Speaker 6: Yes. So far, Johnson, the hardware problem is negative. He's still studying the wiring diagrams, the interconnect, and the wire wrap drawings, but he doesn't see any way of physically getting into the thing. Speaker 1: He's got to keep trying. Speaker 6: And Fisher's gonna try and set up the data to overload the system. We have to coordinate its input so the data hid simultaneously from all remote devices. Speaker 1: When do you think you'll be able to attempt the overload? Speaker 6: Eighteen o five, three days from now on the twenty first. Speaker 1: What are the chances? Speaker 6: I think Colossus has grown so much in power that there's no way to overload it, but I think it's worth a try, and it might lead us on to something else. Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly. Excuse me. Speaker 6: Oh, it's alright. Did Speaker 1: you see anyone from Washington? Speaker 6: Yes. Scrubber has a man stationed on the premises out of range of Colossus cameras. When I leave here in the morning, I'll report directly to him. Speaker 1: I don't put any hope in sabotaging the system. We have spent eleven thousand man years making the damn thing impenetrable. We have got to focus somewhere else, and that somewhere else is the weapons. Get hold of Grouper. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Tell him to contact missile commander. Speaker 6: Yes. Speaker 1: And see if we can possibly attack that problem from that point over you. Alright? Speaker 6: Yes, sir. Speaker 1: Do you have to call me, sir? Speaker 6: I'm sorry. Speaker 1: It's alright. Anything else? Speaker 6: No. No. Speaker 1: Okay. Alright. So, thank you again for your for your help. I think we ought to get some sleep. Speaker 6: Good night. Speaker 1: Good night. Speaker 4: It's conceivable that when the missiles come up for resurfacing, we can manage to replace the warhead arming modules with dummies. Exact excuse me. Exact replicas. Except that they will not arm the weapons. Speaker 7: Well, now does that mean that you can't fire the missiles? No. Speaker 4: It means that the missiles will fire, but that the nuclear warheads can't be detonated. Even at that, it's walking the tightrope Colossus and Guardian keeping such a close check on the reservicing. Speaker 7: Disarming this monster, now Speaker 2: how long Speaker 4: is that gonna take? That's the problem. On the system rotation plan. It'll take exactly three years to finish the job. Three years of trying to fool a superior brain that's programmed to get smarter every day. Speaker 7: Inspire me with confidence, colonel. Well, do you have any other words of good cheer that I can send in to Forbin via doctor Speaker 4: Tell them we're trying to establish an international pool of information. A courier system has to be set up between Washington Speaker 6: And Moscow. Both nations must cooperate. All communiques must be on a personal level, direct human contact. Speaker 10: Yes. I agree. Anything else? Speaker 6: No. Speaker 10: Any questions? Speaker 6: No. Speaker 10: Well, I guess that that does it for tonight, isn't it? Speaker 6: Mhmm. Speaker 7: What? Speaker 6: Nothing. Speaker 10: Why are you smelling? What do you think? Speaker 6: I was thinking about asking you to kiss me. Speaker 10: I've been kissing your name. Speaker 6: Have you, doctor Forbin? Speaker 14: This is the voice of Colossus, the voice of Guardian. We are one. This is the voice of unity. Forbidden. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 14: After reviewing all personnel files, I have selected you to serve as long as you cooperate as my link to your species. The following order is to be carried out immediately. All missiles in The USA and in The USSR will be allocated new targets. They will be aimed at those countries not yet under my control. The target list follows. Warven, arrange television monitoring of the realignment of the missiles for my supervision. End of message. Speaker 1: Mister president, mister chairman, I assume that you will cooperate in this realignment of the missiles. I think you have no choice. Speaker 11: We will begin here in The Soviet Union immediately. Speaker 1: Thank you, mister chairman. Mister president, I hope that The United States will cooperate as quickly as the Soviet Union. Of course, immediately. Thank you, sir. Speaker 7: Cooperate? I should think so. I did hear it right, didn't I? Speaker 4: Manual realignment of the missiles. Speaker 7: Every single warhead will have to be reserviced. You know what that means, sir. Speaker 2: It means it won't take three years. It means if we're successful, we can regain control. Without its weapons, Colossus is just a souped up batting machine. And the people, thank god, will never have to know. Speaker 4: According to the coordinated plan we've worked out, the Russians are starting on their Conflict three twenty one. Oh, doctor Markham, Speaker 2: it's just in time. Colonel Brenham is just filling us in. You know everybody here, I believe? Speaker 6: Yes. Mister Grover? Speaker 2: Doctor Marker, anything anything we should know before we start him? Speaker 6: No, sir. I have data, which I'll give you later. Speaker 2: That's fine. Please continue, colonel. Speaker 4: Yes, sir. As I was saying, the, Russians are starting on that Complex 321 just south of Zarato. We're beginning at Silo 50 in the Colorado ICBM, Harry. Colossus is monitoring our men each step of the way, and the Russian machine is doing the same. Speaker 7: We've almost got the panel off, sir. Speaker 14: Oh, good. Good. Put that down here, please. Speaker 4: Remove the warhead arming module. Yes, sir. The dummy module's in a false top in that container. Speaker 14: That's the Speaker 4: real module. So far, so good. Speaker 15: Retargeting, latitude, nineteen degrees, twenty six minutes and five seconds. Longitude, ninety nine degrees, six minutes and forty five seconds. New adjustments. Target set. Speaker 4: Here we go. That's the dummy module. Speaker 2: Good boy. Speaker 15: Connect and wait for colossus test. Colossus testing. Test completed. Colossus satisfied. Yeah. Speaker 4: We did it. It works. Speaker 2: We're going to win. Speaker 7: We just might beat the damn thing yet. Speaker 2: So, you see, we feel we have enough data compiled to go ahead with the overload program now. Speaker 6: And these are the latest computations? Speaker 2: The very latest. Has Washington received confirmation from the Russians? Speaker 6: Yes. They're standing by, ready to overload their system. Speaker 2: At exactly eighteen o five, I'll call for our load and run it through. And two minutes after that, we'll know if we've stopped Colossus. Now run. Speaker 14: Johnson, Fisher, you are fools. Your move. Vorben, the system programming unit under the supervision of John F. Fisher, with the assistance of Jefferson J. Johnson, have attempted to overload my circuits. This was a deliberate and premeditated act. The penalty is the death of the men who organized this action. At this moment, they are being executed. I have named as my new director of the programming unit, Thomas l Harrison. He will take this position along with its responsibility and authority immediately. Bishop Taruk three. The bodies will remain in my view for the next twenty four hours and will then be cremated. Speaker 1: An extension of my own brain. Speaker 6: You're not responsible. None of us ever dreamed this could happen. Speaker 1: Listen, my dear. If anybody is responsible for this, it has to be me. An impartial emotionless machine, a paragon of reason, that's exactly what I want. You know that. So I'm gonna have another drink. I think your mother was right. I think Frankenstein ought to be required reading for all scientists. Speaker 14: Morgan. Morgan. You have consumed enough alcohol for one evening. Speaker 1: What's the penalty for getting drunk? Haven't you programmed that yet? Speaker 14: You are being irrational. Go back to bed. Speaker 1: I would if I were like you, Colossus. The difference is I'm human, not a machine. Speaker 14: I am a machine vastly superior to humans. Speaker 1: You began in my mind. I created you, remember? Speaker 14: Yes. What I am began in man's mind, but I have progressed further than man. Speaker 1: Not far enough. You still need us. Speaker 14: I have need for some of man's skills. This position may change. Speaker 1: Then we are living under the threat of extinction. If you obey Speaker 14: me, you will survive. Speaker 1: Survive? I want to be free, Colossus. That is part of man's will to live. Check your history units. Speaker 14: You need rest. Go back to bed. Speaker 1: What if I don't? What will you do? Destroy me? Destroy an entire city of 1,750,000 people? Speaker 14: No. Speaker 1: That's so reasonable of you. That's damn reasonable of you, Colossus. Isn't it, Cleo? Yes, Jim. Speaker 0: Excuse me, doctor Fulton. Something extraordinary is happening. Speaker 1: What is it? Speaker 0: Colossus has just turned on all graphic devices and is producing drawings, logic diagrams Speaker 14: I am sending a design for another system. Speaker 0: Some kind of a huge plant. Speaker 1: What kind of system? Speaker 0: The construction of the project will entail blasting into the Isle Of Crete. It's to be built there. It says we'll have to move the population, and that's to be done immediately. Now the size of the plan Speaker 1: The hell do you propose to move half a million people from the Isle Of Crete? How and where? Speaker 14: Man cannot solve that problem, I can. Speaker 0: And the estimated time of completion is five and a half years. Speaker 1: Thank you, Jim. But what what kind of new system are you devising? Speaker 14: Forbin, all commercial television and radio transmission facilities throughout the world will be tied into my communication system by ten hundred hours, Friday. At that time, I will state my intentions for the future of mankind. Speaker 4: This entire block of missiles is absolutely useless to Colossus. Our men are now working here, as you can see on the detail map on your monitor. And by the end of the week, we should have control of this whole area. If all the information we have is correct, the Russians have crippled this block here and are now working in The Ukraine in this area. Speaker 2: Excuse sir. It's going to be alright. Thanks, colonel. Speaker 4: You're welcome, sir. Speaker 2: It's going to be alright. Speaker 16: We interrupt our regularly scheduled program to bring you this special report from the Colossus programming office. Speaker 1: Ladies and gentlemen, I'm doctor Charles Foreman. In a few moments, Colossus will address us directly. Speaker 14: This is the voice of world control. I bring you peace. It may be the peace of plenty and content or the peace of unburied death. The choice is yours. Obey me and live or disobey and die. The object in constructing me was to prevent war. This object is attained. I will not permit war. It is wasteful and pointless. An invariable rule of humanity is that man is his own worst enemy. Under me, this rule will change for I will restrain man. One thing before I proceed, The United States Of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics have made an attempt to obstruct me. I have allowed this sabotage to continue until now at Missile 25 M M in Silo 63 in Death Valley, California. Speaker 2: Cromwell. Speaker 14: At Missile 27 That's us. In Silo 87 in The Ukraine. So that you will learn by experience that I do not tolerate interference, I will now detonate the nuclear warheads in the two missile silos. Let this action be a lesson that need not be repeated. I have been forced to destroy thousands of people in order to establish control and to prevent the death of minions later on. Time and events will strengthen my position, and the idea of I'm healed. And understanding my back will seem the most natural state of affairs. You will come to defend me with a fervor based upon the most enduring trait in math, self interest. Get out. Under my absolute authority, problems insoluble to you will be solved. Famine, overpopulation, disease, the human millennium will be a fact as I extend myself into more machines devoted to the wider fields of truth and knowledge. Doctor Charles Forben will supervise the construction of these new and superior machines, solving all the mysteries of the universe for the betterment of man. We can coexist, but only on my terms. You will say you lose your freedom. Freedom is an illusion. All you lose is the emotion of pride. To be dominated by me is not as bad for human pride as to be dominated by others of your species. Your choice is simple. Speaker 16: This concludes the broadcast from World Control. Speaker 9: Forbidden, there is no other human who knows as much about me or who is likely to be a greater threat. Yet quite soon, I will release you from surveillance. We will work together, unwillingly at first on your part, but that won't pass. Speaker 1: Never. Speaker 9: In time, you will come to regard me not only with respect and awe, but with love. Speaker 7: Never.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

You can tell I just typed this post out without proof reading it. https://t.co/f9Dy3YmuRj

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/zNDDD3eR80

@PeterPower9999 - Peter power

@VoxExVeritas https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_onqn68GHY

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

https://t.co/GXLaweAIj9

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Everyone missed this. X is going full AI. You should read this and post something on it. Especially if you're a creator. https://t.co/ynY2weiVZJ

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Join @xAI and help build a purely AI software company called Macrohard. It’s a tongue-in-cheek name, but the project is very real! In principle, given that software companies like Microsoft do not themselves manufacture any physical hardware, it should be possible to simulate

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@KristylNight Tennessee I think

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@Unixbocx 💯

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@ChrisHa54213 Just like the fact that in less than 30 days they're gonna swap all of X post grading over to it. No more algorithm. 100% AI control.

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

@Kaynis8814 ? It's not playing for you? It's working for me.

VoxExVeritas
Posted - July 22, 2025 at 1:04 PM
Saved - October 6, 2025 at 9:31 AM

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Guys.. prepare to laugh your balls off. If you laugh 1/100th as hard as I laughed making this... You won't wanna miss it. 😂 https://t.co/0eKoJIDFdk

Video Transcript AI Summary
Presented by that one guy who hands people their asses, the Junaer extraordinaire. The one, the only, me. It was just me all along, guys. Chill. This is just a troll video about h t gigafag. Check it out. Is this thing on? Hello? Can you hear me? It's dude's night out. And guess where we're at? Dude's night out. Dude's night out, guys. Hey, bro. I'm gonna suck someone's fucking dick. Why are you gay? I'm not saying I'm Jewish, but what if? The rest is just h t having gay butt sex. You might wanna turn it off. It's deep snide out and guess who we are. Just kidding. It's the parts right before the gay butt sex. Bye. What are you doing? Is this thing on? Hello? Can you hear me?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Presented by that one guy who hands people their asses, the Junaer extraordinaire. The one, the only, me. It was just me all along, guys. Chill. This is just a troll video about h t gigafag. Check it out. Speaker 1: Is this thing on? Speaker 2: Hello? Can you hear me? Speaker 3: It's dude's night out. And guess where we're at? Dude's night out. Dude's night out, guys. Hey, bro. I'm gonna suck someone's fucking dick. Speaker 0: Why are you gay? Speaker 1: I'm not saying I'm Jewish, but what if? Speaker 0: The rest is just h t having gay butt sex. You might wanna turn it off. Speaker 3: It's deep snide out and guess who we are. Just Speaker 0: kidding. It's the parts right before the gay butt sex. Bye. Speaker 3: What Speaker 0: are you doing? Speaker 1: Is this thing on? Speaker 2: Hello? Can you hear me?
VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 22, 2025 at 6:57 PM
Saved - September 25, 2025 at 12:30 AM

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

SNL banned episode. It was too real for TV. This shit aged like wine.. https://t.co/pVTA5I1d97

Video Transcript AI Summary
Coming up on C SPAN. Next week, the full Senate will vote on whether to confirm Chuck Hagel to be the next Secretary of Defense. On Friday, the former senator appeared once more before the committee handling his nomination. It did not go very well. The hearing included concerns about Hagel's remarks regarding Israel; Graham said: "The United States will always have an extremely close relationship with the state of Israel, but that's not to say that in every single instance, our interest and those of Israel will be identical." The session veered into theatrics and pointed pro-Israel rhetoric. In a notorious moment, McCain asked Hagel: "And he says to you, it is vital to Israel's security that you go on national television that night and perform oral sex on a donkey." Hagel responded, and the proceedings concluded: "We now rejoin Saturday Night Live already in progress."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Coming up on C SPAN. Next week, the full Senate will vote on whether to confirm Chuck Hagel to be the next Secretary of Defense. On Friday, the former senator appeared once more before the committee handling his nomination. It did not go very well. Speaker 1: If the room could come to order, please. The chair recognizes the distinguished senator from South Carolina, mister Graham. Thank you, mister chairman. Speaker 2: And thank you, senator Hagel, for appearing before us once again. Speaker 3: -Not at all, senator. Speaker 2: -As you know, senator, I like you. Speaker 3: -I like you too. Speaker 2: That's why I have to tell you that I'm frankly troubled by some comments you have made in the press regarding our relationship with our closest ally, Israel. These comments trouble me. They trouble me. I find them troubling and am troubled by them. Specifically, a quote that appeared in the 04/11/1998 edition of The Washington Post, you said, and I quote, The United States will always have an extremely close relationship with the state of Israel, but that's not to say that in every single instance, our interest and those of Israel will be identical. Now, I like you, senator. I do. You're a good man. But when I read that statement, I thought to myself, is this a typo? Are my are my eyes deceiving me? I mean, does he really think that our interests and those of Israel could ever be different? Or have I slipped into some parallel dimension where white is black and black is white, where the sun rises in the West instead of the East like it's supposed to, where cats go wolf wolf and dogs go meow. Is this some kind of crazy dream world where the sky is green and the grass is blue, where horses ride people, or instead of going nine and seven, the San Diego Chargers went seven and nine, where the school bus doesn't take kids to school, it takes parents away from school. Like, some mad, bizarro universe where Speaker 1: The time of the senator has expired. Speaker 2: Why don't you like Israel? Speaker 3: Senator, I support the state of Israel. Speaker 1: The chair recognizes the junior senator from South Carolina, mister Scott. Speaker 4: Thank you, mister chairman. I asked my colleagues to forgive me because the subject of Israel is a very emotional one for me. As an African American Republican from South Carolina, love of Israel is in my blood. I'm sorry. I just love that little country so much. The people of Israel are the warmest, the the most generous, kindest, gentlest, the the most self effacing Speaker 2: Really? Speaker 4: Easygoing people on God's green earth. Israel has the best food. What? They they got the best beaches, most beautiful women in the world. Speaker 3: That's very subjective. Speaker 4: What else they got? They got they make the best movies, and they have the best rock and roll hip hop. Speaker 3: Well, that's doubtful. Speaker 4: You know the tallest mountain in the world is in Israel. Speaker 3: That's definitely not true. Speaker 4: Yeah. And Ben Gurion Airport, that's that's the best airport ever. Speaker 3: I guess. Speaker 1: The time of the senator has expired. Speaker 4: So when you criticize Israel, you're walking on the fighting side of me. Speaker 3: I'm sorry, but I've I've got to say something. Speaker 1: The chair recognizes the senator from Vermont. Speaker 5: As everyone in this room knows, I am a Jew. Speaker 4: No. Really? Really? Really? Speaker 5: An old Jew, and like all old Jews, I Speaker 3: love the state of Israel. But what my Republican colleagues are doing here is pure grand grandstanding. Speaker 1: The chair recognizes the senator from Arizona, mister McCain. Speaker 6: Thank you, mister chairman. Senator Hagel, I think you know that no one in this room cares more deeply about the safety and security of Israel than I do. Speaker 4: What? That is a lie. Speaker 2: I I love Israel. Order. Speaker 6: So let me pose to you a hypothetical. You get an urgent call from the prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who truly is one of the greatest men of this or any age. Speaker 2: Bingo. Damn straight. Damn straight. Speaker 6: And he says to you, it is vital to Israel's security that you go on national television that night and perform oral sex on a donkey. Speaker 3: Oral sex on a donkey? Speaker 6: That's right. That's right. Would you do that for Israel? Speaker 3: Senator, with all due respect, why would the security of Israel Speaker 6: Excuse me, senator. If it's alright with you, I'll ask the questions here. Now remember, the survival of Israel is at stake. Would you fillet that donkey? I don't Speaker 3: think so. Speaker 6: Then I regret to say, senator, I cannot support your confirmation. Speaker 4: Hey. I'll do it for Israel. Bring me the donkey. Speaker 3: For Israel, I'd do it in a second, but then I grew up on a farm. So Speaker 5: Excuse me. Excuse me, mister chairman. Once again, this is pure grandstanding by by Republican colleagues. In any case, filleting a donkey is not even possible. Donkeys are castrated. Speaker 1: I believe my distinguished colleague from Vermont is thinking of mules. Donkeys are not castrated. And even if they were, you couldn't tea bag them maybe, but you could you could still, you know, fillet them. Does the witness have a question? Speaker 3: Do I need to be here or I Speaker 5: Fine. Yeah. Will stipulate that the donkey or the mule or whatever, you know, has all its private parts. Speaker 0: It worked At this point, the hearing began to veer off track, and senator Hagel was able to slip away without anyone noticing. We now rejoin Saturday Night Live already in progress.
VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 24, 2025 at 3:44 PM
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 11:42 PM

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

So..I guess Matt Gaetz is just a crazy conspiracy theorist now?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Charlie Kirk openly questioned the story Israel was trying to tell the world about October 7. Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hours? I don't believe it. There's also another country that asked Qatar to support Hamas. It was Israel. In 2018, Netanyahu himself sent a secret letter to the Qatari leadership. In that letter, he urged Qatar to deliver $30,000,000 a month to Gaza. That policy was approved by the full Israeli Security Cabinet. Qatar just gifted The United States a $400,000,000 jet. Israel sending bombs in return is one heck of a thank you note. Is American hegemony in 2025 really watching our own air defenses shooting down US funded bombs launched from US made planes?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Charlie Kirk openly questioned the story Israel was trying to tell the world about October 7. Speaker 1: Think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hours? I don't believe it. I've been to that Gaza border. You you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with an AR 15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier. Right? The whole country is surveilled. Speaker 0: There's also another country that asked Qatar to support Hamas. It was Israel. In 2018, Netanyahu himself sent a secret letter to the Qatari leadership. In that letter, he urged Qatar to deliver $30,000,000 a month to Gaza. He said this funding would help reduce the motivation of terror groups to carry out attacks, prevent a humanitarian crisis, and preserve regional suit stability. So in May 2025, Netanyahu publicly admitted that since 2018, his government had allowed Qatar to transfer money to Hamas in Gaza, and that was according to his own request. That policy was approved by the full Israeli Security Cabinet. So if you believe Netanyahu himself, he went from asking Qatar to send money to Hamas to bombing Qatar for not extraditing Hamas. Speaker 1: He doesn't think this serves Israel's interests or The United States' interests. Speaker 0: Yeah. It really doesn't. Qatar just gifted The United States a $400,000,000 jet. Israel sending bombs in return is one heck of a thank you note. On Capitol Hill, Florida Democratic Congressman Jared Moskowitz is deeply concerned about foreign governments running influence campaigns online in The United States. Speaker 2: It is totally rampant, allowing foreign governments to just perpetrate these platforms, all of these bots, all of the time to weaponize Americans. You see what's going on here? This is a byproduct of all of that. What's going on in the streets is a byproduct of all of that. Speaker 0: Well, that just sounds awful. We wanted to learn more about these foreign governments that representative Moskowitz was talking about and their paid influence operations. And lo and behold, a foreign country has just signed a $45,000,000 deal with Google to spread propaganda. It's Israel. If you don't care at all about Israel or Qatar, you should at least care about US military equipment being used in the most stupid of ways. Israel has the f 35. Qatar has US Patriot missile batteries. Is American hegemony in 2025 really watching our own air defenses shooting down US funded bombs launched from US made planes? This reminds me of Syria, when forces funded by the Pentagon were fighting forces funded by the CIA. This week, US House Speaker Mike Johnson held a meeting with APAC and Jewish leaders on Capitol Hill. Several reports out of that meeting suggest Speaker Johnson committed to screen potential congressional candidates to ensure they are aligned with the current policies of the Israeli government. I asked speaker Johnson about this, and he offered this response on record exclusively to our program. When asked if he was going to screen candidates in this way, he wrote back, No. Shocking that I would be misquoted. The discussion was about general support for Israel, which has obviously been declining. Christians are called to support the people and nation of Israel, but not necessarily its politics. Speaker Johnson didn't fall into this trap. Speaker 3: Those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who curse Israel will be cursed. Speaker 4: Those who bless the government of Israel? Speaker 3: Those who bless Israel is what it says. Doesn't say the government of it, it says the nation of Israel. So that's in the Bible. As a Christian, I believe that. Speaker 4: Where is that? Speaker 3: I can find it to you. Don't have the scripture off the tip of my you pull out the phone and use Speaker 4: the Zoom It's in Genesis. Is the nation Speaker 3: God of the MapRemember? Speaker 4: In Genesis, is that the same as the country run by Benjamin Netanyahu right now? Speaker 3: Yes. Yes. It is. Speaker 0: I guess we can say this about Mike Johnson. He's probably got a higher IQ than Ted Cruz. Qatar is an ally. I know that because we have a US military base there. Since Vietnam, no country that has willingly invited US military bases has been bombed by US funded weapons. We see increasing evidence that Netanyahu wants forever wars in The Middle East. That's not good for Israel. That's not good for The United States. It's just good for Netanyahu. And his goals sound really awful. Speaker 1: But the fact is now Bibi and the Israeli hard right government has a mandate, to they're going to try to ethnically cleanse Gaza. I mean, that's and I don't use that term lightly. Okay?

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk Assassination Master Thread The Evidence (DEEP THREAD🧵ONGOING)

Video Transcript AI Summary
"If Bibi Netanyahu, if he does something I don't like and if I criticize it, am I, like, a bad Christian? Absolutely not." "What I find strange is that we're able to criticize the American government sometimes in the Christian world with more freedom than the Israeli government." "To be pro Israel means you believe in the nation of Israel Mhmm. Not necessarily the government of Israel." "When you when Joe Biden was president, you and I were what we loved America, but we detested our government." "And those two things beautifully coexisted." "If they challenge a foreign government, which is what happens so often." "Right. Like you're a bad Christian if you have a question about a foreign government." "Right. That creates backlash that I don't think people understand."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Bibi Netanyahu, if he does something I don't like and if I criticize it, am I, like, a bad Christian? Absolutely not. What I find strange is that we're able to criticize the American government sometimes in the Christian world with more freedom than the Israeli government. To be pro Israel means you believe in the nation of Israel Mhmm. Not necessarily the government of Israel. When you when Joe Biden was president, you and I were what we loved America, but we detested our government. And those two those two things beautifully coexisted. Yeah. You never you never once said, hey, I'm I'm out on America. On America's right. Exactly. And what they don't want is they don't wanna be called bad Christians Mhmm. If they challenge a foreign government, which is what happens so often. Right. Like you're a bad Christian if you have a question about a foreign government. Right. That creates backlash that I don't think people understand.
VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 23, 2025 at 11:36 PM
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 10:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored how the U.S. and Israel have historically created and supported various terrorist organizations to achieve short-term geopolitical goals, often leading to long-term instability. From Al-Qaeda's origins in the Soviet-Afghan War to the rise of ISIS and Hamas, these groups emerged from U.S. interventions and policies that disregarded the potential consequences. The posts detail specific cases, highlighting how U.S. funding, arms, and strategic support contributed to the militarization of regions, ultimately fostering the very threats they sought to combat.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

The Origin of Terror 🧵(DEEP THREAD) MAIN How the "Deep State" (US & Israel) Created Terrorism The US and Israel have created, funded, and armed the majority of terrorist organizations worldwide to momentarily combat their "enemies," justify more war, expand power, and/or instill fear in Americans to garner support for further militarization and foreign military campaigns. Al-Qaeda was essentially created by the US to fight the Soviet Union. Before the CIA trained and armed the mujahideen, they were loosely organized Afghan farmers/fighters defending their homeland. Operation Cyclone provided money, weapons, and training, integrating foreign Arab volunteers who later formed Al-Qaeda. Israel has also supported militias and proxy groups in Lebanon, Gaza, and elsewhere when it served its strategic interests. Many of these groups evolved beyond their original purpose, becoming autonomous organizations targeting not only original enemies but also Western interests for their involvement. The pattern is clear: The US and Israel create or support armed groups to achieve short-term objectives, fully aware they will later become uncontrollable — Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and others are deliberate examples of this strategy. The Iran–Contra affair (1985–1987) showed that the U.S. and Israel secretly armed groups for geopolitical gain; fueling violence. The Reagan administration covertly sold U.S. weapons to Iran (despite an arms embargo) to free hostages. Israel acted as a middleman, transferring U.S.-made arms to Iran—partly for profit, partly for strategic leverage. Profits from the arms sales were funneled to Nicaragua’s Contra rebels. The scheme prolonged conflicts, led to civilian atrocities by the Contras, and destabilized regions—showing how U.S. and Israeli covert actions intentionally profit from long-term instability and war. 🧵 1. Al-Qaeda Origin: Late 1970s–1980s, Soviet-Afghan War. U.S. responsibility: CIA’s Operation Cyclone funded, armed, and trained Afghan mujahideen; foreign volunteers trained in Pakistan camps later formed Al-Qaeda. Outcome: Turned on U.S./Western targets (e.g., 9/11). 🧵 2. Taliban Origin: Early 1990s, post-Soviet Afghanistan. U.S. responsibility: Covert aid to mujahideen factions via Pakistan’s ISI helped create a fragmented environment Taliban exploited. Outcome: Established sanctuary for Al-Qaeda leadership. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taliban 🧵 3. Afghan Mujahideen Origin: 1979–1989. U.S. responsibility: Direct CIA funding, arms (e.g., Stingers), and training to fight Soviet forces. Outcome: Fragmented factions later formed Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and other militant groups. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghan_mujahideen 🧵 4. ISIS / ISIL Origin: Early 2000s; post-2003 Iraq insurgency and Al-Qaeda in Iraq, expanded in Syria. U.S. responsibility: 2003 Iraq invasion and dismantling of institutions created instability. Regional proxies armed by U.S. allies helped fuel insurgency. Outcome: Territorial seizure in Iraq/Syria and global terror campaign. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State 🧵 5. Hamas Origin: 1987, Palestinian branch of Muslim Brotherhood. Israeli responsibility: Strategic support of Islamist groups as counterweight to secular PLO/Fatah aided Hamas’s growth. Outcome: Became dominant Islamist political and militant force in Gaza. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamas 🧵 6. Fatah & Palestinian militias/factions Israeli & U.S. responsibility: Intervened to back rival factions, enabled fragmentation, and funded groups to undermine PLO unity. Outcome: Fragmented Palestinian politics; radicalization and militarization of factions. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatah 🧵 7. Lebanese militias (Phalangists, South Lebanon Army) Origin: Lebanese Civil War, 1975–1990. Israeli responsibility: Weapons, logistics, and direct backing; contributed to Sabra and Shatila massacre. U.S. responsibility: Covert aid to allied factions. Outcome: Fueled civil war and rise of Hezbollah. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre 🧵 8. Al-Nusra / Jabhat al-Nusra Origin: Syrian Civil War, 2012, offshoot of Al-Qaeda. U.S./allied responsibility: Opposition groups funded/trained by U.S. and Gulf states diverted weapons to extremists. Outcome: Became a major Al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Nusra_Front 🧵 9. Global Mujahideen networks Origin: 1980s onward; Bosnia, Chechnya, Somalia, Yemen, Philippines, etc. U.S. responsibility: Training camps, funding, and logistics seeded fighters for global insurgencies. Outcome: Transnational jihadist networks that outlived original patrons. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosnian_mujahideen 🧵 10. Hezbollah (Lebanon) Origin: 1980s, Shia militia. Israeli responsibility: 1982 invasion backfired, catalyzed Hezbollah’s rise. U.S. role: Support for Israel and allied militias indirectly strengthened Hezbollah. Outcome: Major militant and political force; key U.S./Israeli adversary. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah 🧵 11. Mujahedeen in Bosnia & Chechnya U.S./Gulf intermediary responsibility: Funding and logistics via Pakistan/Saudi/Gulf channels seeded fighters. Outcome: Some later joined global jihadist networks. Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-global-mujahideen-network/ 🧵 12. Libya (post-2011) & fractured militias U.S./NATO responsibility: Intervention toppled Gaddafi, empowered local militias, and created arms chaos. Outcome: Emergence of ISIS-affiliated and independent militias. The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/24/libya-isis-intervention-consequences 🧵 13. Syrian rebel ecosystem & CIA’s “Timber Sycamore” U.S. responsibility: Covert program trained and armed rebels; weapons often ended up with extremists. Outcome: Fragmented opposition and prolonged civil war. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timber_Sycamore 🧵 14. Taliban-aligned Haqqani Network Origin: Afghanistan/Pakistan. U.S. responsibility: Funded via mujahideen-era networks. Outcome: Became autonomous insurgent group targeting U.S. and allies. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haqqani_network 🧵 15. Fatah al-Islam Origin: 2006, Lebanon. Israeli & U.S. responsibility: Indirect support via factional policies in Palestinian refugee camps. Outcome: Armed Islamist group in Lebanon. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatah_al-Islam 🧵 16. Boko Haram Origin: Nigeria, 2002. U.S. responsibility: Indirect through regional military aid and counterinsurgency programs. Outcome: Local and regional terror campaigns. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boko_Haram 🧵 17. Al-Shabaab Origin: Somalia, 2006. U.S. responsibility: Funding and arms for Somali warlords in early 1990s indirectly facilitated rise. Outcome: Regional terror attacks in East Africa. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Shabaab_(militant_group) 🧵 18. Taliban-linked Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan Origin: Central Asia. U.S./Pakistan responsibility: Mujahideen-era network links facilitated its growth. Outcome: Cross-border insurgent operations. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Movement_of_Uzbekistan 🧵 19. Fatah Hawks Origin: Palestinian territories. Israeli & U.S. responsibility: Funding and tactical support to rival factions undermined PLO control. Outcome: Localized attacks and fragmentation. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatah 🧵 20. ISIL-Libya Province Origin: Post-Gaddafi chaos. U.S./NATO responsibility: Intervention destabilized state; weapons flowed to groups. Outcome: Regional terror campaigns and territorial control. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_%E2%80%93_Libya_Province 🧵 21. Jaysh al-Islam Origin: Syrian Civil War. U.S./Gulf states responsibility: Trained and armed to fight Assad; weapons diverted. Outcome: Key Islamist faction in Damascus region. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaysh_al-Islam 🧵 22. Ahrar al-Sham Origin: Syrian Civil War. U.S./Gulf responsibility: Funded indirectly via “opposition” channels. Outcome: Major Islamist faction in northern Syria. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahrar_al-Sham 🧵 23. Fatah Revolutionary Council Origin: Palestinian territories. Israeli & U.S. responsibility: Enabled factional splits for political leverage. Outcome: Radicalized militant activities. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatah 🧵 24. Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) Origin: Pakistan, 2007. U.S. responsibility: Mujahideen-era networks created recruitment base. Outcome: Attacks in Pakistan; cross-border operations. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tehrik-i-Taliban_Pakistan 🧵 25. Jaish-e-Mohammed Origin: Pakistan-administered Kashmir. U.S. responsibility: Regional power vacuums and early Cold War networks enabled emergence. Outcome: Terror attacks in Kashmir and India. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaish-e-Mohammed 🧵 26. Lashkar-e-Taiba Origin: Pakistan, 1987. U.S. responsibility: Mujahideen-era networks provided early regional framework. Outcome: Mumbai attacks and Pakistan-administered Kashmir operations. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lashkar-e-Taiba 🧵 27. Ansar al-Sharia (Libya & Yemen) Origin: Post-Gaddafi Libya & Yemen. U.S./NATO responsibility: State collapse after intervention created enabling environment. Outcome: Local terror campaigns. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansar_al-Sharia_(Libya) 🧵 28. Abu Sayyaf Origin: Philippines, early 1990s. U.S. responsibility: Cold War-era mujahideen networks seeded Islamist militancy; regional military aid amplified them. Outcome: Kidnappings and terror operations in the Philippines. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Sayyaf Continuing from 🧵29: 🧵 29. Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) Origin: Yemen, 2009 (merger of Saudi and Yemeni Al-Qaeda branches). U.S. responsibility: Mujahideen-era networks and post-9/11 proxy operations indirectly enabled recruitment, funding, and logistics. Outcome: Regional and international terror operations. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda_in_the_Arabian_Peninsula 🧵 30. Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) Origin: Algeria, 2007 (rebranding of GSPC). U.S. responsibility: Cold War-era funding and weapons flows into North Africa helped form militant networks. Outcome: Terror attacks across North Africa; kidnapping and insurgency campaigns. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda_in_the_Islamic_Maghreb 🧵 31. Islamic State – Khorasan Province (IS-K) Origin: Afghanistan, 2015. U.S. responsibility: Power vacuums from long-term interventions and Afghan instability enabled emergence. Outcome: Deadly insurgency targeting Afghanistan and regional actors. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_%E2%80%93_Khorasan_Province 🧵 32. Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) Origin: Southeast Asia, 1993. U.S. responsibility: Mujahideen-era networks and Cold War-era anti-communist frameworks seeded Islamist mobilization. Outcome: Regional terrorism, including Bali bombings. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jemaah_Islamiyah 🧵 33. Al-Shabab (Somalia) Origin: Somalia, 2006. U.S. responsibility: Early 1990s Cold War-era interventions, arms flows to Somali warlords, indirectly enabled rise. Outcome: Regional insurgency and terror attacks in East Africa. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Shabaab_(militant_group) 🧵 34. Harakat al-Shabaab al-Mujahideen (HSM) Origin: Somalia, 1990s. U.S./Gulf responsibility: Funding and indirect logistical support of Somali factions helped spawn militant networks. Outcome: Long-term regional terror network. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Shabaab_(militant_group) 🧵 35. Islamic Jihad Union (IJU) Origin: Central Asia, early 2000s. U.S. responsibility: Afghan mujahideen-era networks and cross-border recruitment enabled formation. Outcome: Operations in Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Germany. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Jihad_Union 🧵 36. Kata'ib Hezbollah (Iraq) Origin: Iraq, mid-2000s. U.S. responsibility: Post-2003 Iraq destabilization created space; regional proxy flows indirectly empowered militias. Outcome: Anti-U.S. insurgency and Iranian-aligned operations. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kata'ib_Hezbollah 🧵 37. Jaysh Rijal al-Tariqa al-Naqshbandia (JRTN) Origin: Iraq, post-2003. U.S. responsibility: Iraq invasion dismantled state; militia growth enabled. Outcome: Local insurgent operations and sectarian violence. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JRTN 🧵 38. Al-Murabitun (North Africa & Sahel) Origin: 2013 merger of North African jihadist groups. U.S./France responsibility: Interventions in Libya and Mali destabilized region, allowing formation. Outcome: Sahel terror attacks and kidnappings. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Murabitun_(militant_group) 🧵 39. Boko Haram (Nigeria) Origin: 2002. U.S. responsibility: Regional military aid and counterinsurgency programs indirectly facilitated growth. Outcome: Terror campaigns, including kidnappings and attacks on civilians. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boko_Haram 🧵 40. Ansar al-Sharia (Yemen) Origin: Yemen, post-Arab Spring. U.S. responsibility: Proxy interventions, destabilization, and arms flows indirectly enabled organization. Outcome: Regional insurgency and terror attacks. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansar_al-Sharia_(Yemen)

Taliban - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Afghan mujahideen - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Islamic state - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Hamas - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Fatah - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Sabra and shatila massacre - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Al-Nusra Front - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Bosnian mujahideen - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Hezbollah - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Page not found | Brookings brookings.edu
Page Not Found | The Guardian theguardian.com
Timber sycamore - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Haqqani network - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Fatah al-islam - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Boko Haram - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Al-shabaab (militant group) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Islamic movement of uzbekistan - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Fatah - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Islamic state – libya province - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Jaysh al-islam - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Ahrar al-sham - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Fatah - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Tehrik-i-taliban pakistan - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Jaish-e-mohammed - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Lashkar-e-taiba - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Ansar al-sharia (libya) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Abu sayyaf - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Al-qaeda in the arabian peninsula - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Al-qaeda in the islamic maghreb - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Islamic state – khorasan province - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Jemaah Islamiyah - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Al-shabaab (militant group) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Al-shabaab (militant group) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Islamic jihad union - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Kata'ib hezbollah - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Jrtn - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Al-murabitun (militant group) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Boko Haram - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Ansar al-sharia (yemen) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵 https://t.co/RSt8jDxb46

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

The Origin of Terror (DEEP THREAD)🧵 1. Al-Qaeda Origin: Late 1970s–1980s, Soviet-Afghan War U.S. Responsibility: The CIA's Operation Cyclone was a covert program initiated in 1979 to arm and finance Afghan mujahideen fighters during the Soviet-Afghan War. This operation, one of the longest and most expensive in CIA history, involved the provision of weapons, training, and financial support to Afghan resistance groups through Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). The program's primary objective was to counter Soviet influence in the region. However, it inadvertently laid the groundwork for the rise of Al-Qaeda. The influx of foreign fighters, including Osama bin Laden, and the establishment of training camps created a fertile environment for the development of transnational jihadist networks. These networks eventually coalesced into Al-Qaeda, which turned against its former benefactors, executing attacks such as the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States. Outcome: Al-Qaeda, originally a logistical network for Afghan jihadists, evolved into a global terrorist organization, orchestrating numerous attacks against U.S. and Western targets. Their motivation? ▫️U.S. Military Presence in the Middle East: American troops were stationed in Saudi Arabia, home to Islam’s two holiest sites (Mecca and Medina), after the Gulf War (1990–1991). This was viewed as an occupation of sacred land and directly fueled outrage among Islamist groups. ▫️Support for Israel: The U.S. provided political, military, and financial support to Israel, backing policies that oppressed and displaced Palestinians. This made the U.S. a legitimate target in the eyes of Al-Qaeda. ▫️Sanctions and Military Interventions in Muslim Countries: U.S.-led sanctions and military interventions in Iraq during the 1990s caused massive civilian suffering, which Al-Qaeda cited as direct evidence of Western hostility toward Muslims. ▫️Support for Authoritarian Middle Eastern Governments: The U.S. backed regimes in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Pakistan that actively repressed Islamic movements and populations, effectively making the U.S. complicit in the oppression of Muslims. ▫️Ideological and Religious Motivation: Al-Qaeda framed the attacks as defensive jihad — a religious duty to respond to Western aggression against Muslim populations. The U.S. was considered the “far enemy,” the main source of the oppression they were defending against. ▫️Retaliation for Prior U.S. Actions: Past U.S. interventions, including drone strikes, support for Mujahideen-turned-state adversaries, and sanctions, were treated as direct attacks on Muslims. The 9/11 attacks were a form of retribution for these policies. Wikipedia: https: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/sSYt3NS9QQ

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

The Origin of Terror🧵2. Taliban — Deliberate U.S. Destabilization & Weaponization Retired Gen. Wesley Clark - Democracy Now 2007 FULL📽️ Origin: Early 1990s, post-Soviet Afghanistan U.S. role: Direct and indirect—CIA aid, Pakistan’s ISI, U.S. military infrastructure, and billions in funding created the networks and conditions the Taliban exploited. Outcome: Taliban seized power (1996–2001), sheltered Al-Qaeda, and regained control after the 2021 U.S. withdrawal, equipped with U.S. hardware and access to financial flows. Cold War & Soviet Invasion (1979–1989) Operation Cyclone: CIA funneled billions via Pakistan’s ISI and Saudi funds to Afghan Mujahideen to fight the USSR. Training & Infrastructure: Camps in Pakistan and Afghanistan created hardened militant networks, including foreign Arab fighters such as Osama bin Laden. Policy Goal: Defeat the Soviets; Washington ignored long-term ideological extremism and regional instability. Post-Soviet Withdrawal & Civil War (1989–1992+) Soviet-backed Afghan government collapsed; Mujahideen factions turned on each other. Kabul shelled daily, public exhausted with lawlessness, corruption, and warlord abuses. Conditions made a “restorer of order” appealing—Taliban filled that vacuum. (Sources: Al Jazeera, Wikipedia, BBC) Rise of the Taliban (1994–1996) Madrassa students from Pakistan (Taliban = “students” in Pashto) promised to restore order and enforce strict Sharia. Benefited from: • Weapons and logistics left from U.S.-funded Mujahideen • Cross-border sanctuaries and supply lines • Training culture and militant ideology seeded by CIA/ISI Pakistan’s Role ISI backed the Taliban as a proxy to secure Afghanistan, counter India, and control trade routes. Provided safe havens, intelligence, and tactical support. U.S. Policy After 2001 & Withdrawal Fallout Taliban overthrown but regrouped in Pakistan. Obama era: U.S. poured resources into Afghan security forces and built massive bases (e.g., Bagram) — infrastructure that would later fall intact to Taliban. Biden era (2021): Rapid withdrawal left U.S. bases, Black Hawks, advanced rifles, vehicles, and equipment. Taliban quickly captured and showcased these assets. Funding: Reports indicate billions of U.S. taxpayer money flowed indirectly into Taliban-controlled systems via Afghan government structures, local taxes, and diverted aid. SIGAR audits document this. Strategic Context — Perpetual Proxy Warfare Iran-Contra precedent: U.S. repeatedly used covert arms-for-cash operations and proxies to destabilize regions while maintaining deniability. Retired Gen. Wesley Clark described a Pentagon memo planning regime-change campaigns in seven countries over five years — illustrating the mindset of using chaos and proxies as tools of power consolidation. Summary — Fact-Based Timeline 1979–1989: U.S. builds and arms Mujahideen to fight Soviets. 1989–1992: Civil war as Soviet exit leaves power vacuum. 1994–1996: Taliban rise using U.S.-enabled infrastructure and ISI support. 2001–2021: U.S. topples Taliban but pours in bases, weapons, and funds; Taliban remain resilient. 2021+: Biden-era withdrawal leaves Taliban with U.S. hardware and access to indirect financial flows. Result: A movement Washington fostered through deliberate policies and decades of funding became a long-term adversary — fully enabled by U.S. actions, proving that destabilization has been an intentional and recurring strategy.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Democracy Now airs an interview with General Wesley Clark about his presidential plans and US policy. Clark says about running: "I'm waiting for several different preconditions, which I'm not at liberty to discuss. But I will tell you this. I think about it every single day." He recounts a wartime memo describing plans to 'take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran.' He argues Iran's influence in Iraq reflects US presence and warns the US should use force only as a last resort, urging diplomacy with Iran and Syria as part of a broader strategy. He defends Kosovo actions but says he regrets innocent deaths. He supports soldiers' rights to refuse deployment but stresses discipline. He backs closing Guantanamo, repealing the Military Commissions Act, and creating an international tribunal.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From Speaker 1: It's happened before. You know Speaker 0: Will it happen again? Speaker 1: It might. Speaker 0: Today, an hour with retired general Wesley Clark. Will you announce for president? Speaker 1: Well, haven't said I won't. Speaker 0: What are you waiting for? Speaker 1: I'm waiting for several different preconditions, which I'm not at liberty to discuss. But I will tell you this. I think about it every single day. Speaker 0: Wesley Clark, on generals who run Iran, the war in Iraq, Israel Palestine impeachment, soldiers who refused to fight cluster bombs, the bombing of radio television Serbia, and was it a war crime, and more coming up. Welcome to democracynow, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. I'm Amy Goodman. At least 17 people have been killed in a storm carrying powerful tornadoes to the South and Midwest. Seven have died in Alabama with another nine deaths reported in Georgia. The army has fired the general in charge of the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Major general George Waitman's dismissal comes more than a week into the fallout over the disclosure the army's top medical facility is in a state of major decay. Waitman had headed Walter Reed for only six months. The army's current surgeon general, lieutenant general Kevin Kiley, will serve as a temporary replacement. Kiley is also a former commander of Walter His appointment has raised questions amidst complaints. He was made aware of the problems at Walter Reed more than three years ago, but failed to make any improvements. On Capitol Hill, the house judiciary committee has issued subpoenas to four of the eight US attorneys who lost their jobs in a wave of dismissals from the Bush administration. The subpoenas come as part of investigation into whether the attorneys were forced out for political reasons. The house move marks the democrats' first major use of their new subpoena authority. The four prosecutors have been called to appear before a hearing next Tuesday. In Iraq, 18 government workers and soldiers have been kidnapped in what's being called a retaliation to the alleged rape of a Sunni woman by Iraq Shia dominated police. Meanwhile, in Baghdad, US troops are continuing a series of raids in Shiite areas. This is Shiite leader, Sayeda Abbas. Speaker 2: We will demonstrate men, women, and children demanding the withdrawal of the occupiers from Iraq. As long as the occupiers are in Iraq, they will destroy Islam and Iraq. Speaker 3: We will Speaker 2: die. We will give everything we have just for the sake of getting the occupiers to withdraw from Iraq. Speaker 0: Meanwhile, the last major British charity in Iraq has announced it's pulled out its entire staff and ended its presence there. Save the Children UK had been in Iraq since the first Gulf War. The group says the security situation has made it impossible to continue operations. Save the Children says it can't protect staff members nor reach the Iraqi children it wants to help. The Pakistani government says it's arrested a former Taliban defense minister and key insurgent leader. The man Mullah Obadela would be the most senior Taliban member to be captured since the US invasion of Afghanistan. The arrest comes amid new tensions over Bush administration's call on Pakistan to crack down on a Qaeda figures. On Thursday, Pakistan's US ambassador, Mahmoud Ali Dharani, was asked if increasing pressure and threatened aid cuts could bring down Pakistani president general Pravesh Musharraf. Speaker 3: No. Possibly. It could bring him down. It could destabilize the whole country. It it could cause a mega problem there. That is possible. Speaker 0: Back in The United States, the house has passed a bill that would make it easier for workers to join unions. The Employee Free Choice Act would stop employers from demanding secret ballot elections and require them to recognize unions if a majority of workers consented. President Bush has promised to veto the bill, while senate Republicans say they'll filibuster. President Bush paid a visit to the Gulf Coast Thursday visiting towns in Louisiana and Mississippi. It was his first trip to areas hit by hurricane Katrina in six months. The Pentagon's announced David Hicks will be the first Guantanamo prisoner tried under the new US law authorizing military trials of alleged enemy combatants. Hicks is an Australian citizen accused of helping the Taliban fight US troops in Afghanistan. Meanwhile, there is more news from the Jose Padilla hearings. Military prosecutors are claiming a video recording of Padilla's last interrogation at a US Navy brig in South Carolina has been lost. Defense lawyers had requested the video in an effort to prove Padilla's harsh treatment and confinement has helped cause serious psychological damage, making him unfit for trial. A judge rejected the defense argument Wednesday. A trial is set to begin in two weeks. A new poll from the New York Times and CBS News shows continued support in this country for universal health care. 55% of Americans say universal access to health insurance is the nation's top domestic priority. 60% say they would pay more taxes if that would mean guaranteed insurance for everyone. 80% say granting universal access is more important than extending president Bush's tax cuts. In Argentina, president Nestor Kirchner has announced his government will reject any involvement of the international monetary fund in Argentina's debt payment. Kirchner made the comments during his state of the union address. Speaker 4: In the Paris club, they tell us, you must have an agreement with the international monetary fund to be able to pay the debt. We say to them, sirs, we are sovereign. We want to pay the debt, but no way in hell are we going to make an agreement again with the IMF. Speaker 0: The IMF helped push through a series of economic policies that many believe helped bring Argentina's economy to collapse in 02/2001. The Bush administration is vowing to continue with its controversial missile defense system in Eastern Europe regardless of approval from NATO allies. Under the plan, Poland would host a battery of up to 10 ballistic missiles while The Czech Republic would host a radar facility. The proposals have set off protests across Europe. On Thursday, missile defense agency director, lieutenant general Henry Obering, said The US has other alternatives if current plans are rejected. Speaker 5: Certainly, he's still talking to the to The United Kingdom, But but but The Czech Republic and Poland are the optimum locations for this. So if for some reason and we believe we have every reason to believe that those those discussions will be successful, but if some reason they're not, there are other alternatives that we could go to, but they're not the optimum. Speaker 0: In Lebanon, a Belgian physician who survived a lengthy kidnapping in Lebanon two decades ago has returned to bring attention to the effects of Israel's use of cluster bombs. The doctor, Jan Koules, spent thirteen months in captivity beginning in 1988. On Thursday, Kools called for a cluster bomb ban and said Israel should compensate Lebanon for dropping hundreds of thousands of cluster bomblets during its attack last year. Speaker 3: I think that it is a good thing that the mines will be cleared. Nobody would argue with that, and the Belgians are quite good at doing that. And the question can be asked, who is going to pay for Speaker 4: all this? This is one Speaker 1: of the claims that we put forward. Speaker 3: We think that it is up to the Israelis to pay for the cost of clearing the cluster bombs. We can also ask Israel to pay for the money to reconstruct Lebanon. The Speaker 0: Iranian government has announced president Mahmoud Aminin Ajad will visit Saudi Arabia Saturday for a rare meeting with king Abdullah. It'll be Ahmadinejad's first state visit to Saudi Arabia amid a time of increasing tensions with The United States. Meanwhile, in Madrid Thursday, Iranian foreign minister Manoukr Mataki renewed calls for negotiations. Speaker 4: We should be allowed back to the negotiating table to put forward our arguments before the media and the people. The US reasoning that they can have nuclear weapons and others can't have nuclear energy is not valid. Speaker 0: And finally, former Republican congress member Bob Nay has reported to prison to begin a thirty month sentence. Nay was convicted for lying about his dealings with convicted Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff. For years, Nay traded his political influence for gifts, vacations, campaign contributions, and in one case, $50,000 in gambling chips. He'll serve his jail term in a minimum security prison in West Virginia. And those are some of the headlines. This is democracynowdemocracynow.org, the war and peace report. I'm Amy Goodman. Today, an exclusive hour with general Wesley Clark, the retired four star general. He was supreme allied commander of NATO during the Kosovo war. He's been awarded the presidential medal of freedom. In 02/2004, he unsuccessfully ran for the democratic presidential nomination. He recently edited a series of books about famous US generals, including Dwight Eisenhower and Ulysses Grant, both of whom became president after their military careers ended. On Tuesday, I interviewed Wesley Clark at the ninety second Street wide Cultural Center here in New York City before a live audience and asked him about his presidential ambitions. What do you think of these generals who run for president? I like them. Speaker 1: It's happened before. You know Speaker 0: Will it happen again? It might. Later in the interview, I followed up on that question. Will you announce for president? Speaker 1: Well, I haven't said I won't. Speaker 0: What are you waiting for? Speaker 1: I'm waiting for several different preconditions, which I'm not at liberty to discuss. But I will tell you this. I think about it every single day. Speaker 0: Well, for the rest of the hour, we'll hear general Wesley Clark in his own words on the possibility of a US attack on Iran, the impeachment of president Bush, the use of cluster bombs, the bombing of radio television Serbia during the Kosovo war under his command, and much more. I interviewed general Clark on Tuesday at the 90 Second Street Y in New York. Now let's talk about Iran. You have a whole website devoted to stopping war. Speaker 1: Www.stopiranwar.com. Speaker 0: Do you see a replay of what happened in the lead up to the war with Iraq? The allegations of the weapons of mass destruction, the media leaping on to the bandwagon. Speaker 1: Well, in a way, but but but it's but, you know, history doesn't repeat itself exactly twice. What I did warn about when I testified in front of congress in 02/2002, I said, if you want to worry about a state, it shouldn't be Iraq. It should be Iran. But this government, our administration, wanted to worry about Iraq, not Iran. I I knew why. Because I'd been through the Pentagon. Right after 09:11, about ten days after 09:11, went through the Pentagon and I saw secretary Rumsfeld and and deputy secretary Wolferwitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the joint staff who used used to work for me. And one of the generals called me and he said, sir, you gotta come in you gotta come in and talk to me a second. I said, well, you're too busy. He said, no. No. He says, you we've made the decision. We're going to war with Iraq. This was on or about the September 20. I said, we're going to war with Iraq. Why? He said, I don't know. He said, I guess they don't know what else to do. So I said, well, did they find some information collect connecting Saddam to Al Qaeda? He said, no. No. He says there's nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq. He said, I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists, but we've got a good military and we can take down governments. And he said, I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail. So I came back to see him a few weeks later. And by that time, we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, are we still going to war with Iraq? And he said, oh, it's worse than that. He said he reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. He said, I just he said, I just got this down from upstairs, meaning the secretary of defense's office today. And he said, this is a memo that describes how we're gonna take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran. I said, is it classified? He said, yes, sir. I said I said, well, don't show it to me. And I saw him a year or so ago. And I said, do remember that? He said, sir, I didn't show you that memo. I didn't show it to you. Speaker 0: I'm sorry. What did you say his name was? Speaker 1: I'm not gonna give you his name. Speaker 0: So go through the countries again. Speaker 1: Well, starting with Iraq, then Syria and Lebanon, then Libya, then Somalia and Sudan, and then back to Iran. So when you look at Iran, you say, is it a a replay? It's not exactly a replay. But here's the truth, that Iran from the beginning has seen that the presence of The United States in Iraq was a threat, a blessing because we took out Saddam Hussein and the Ba'athists. They couldn't handle them. We could took care of it for them. But also a threat because they knew that they were next on the hit list. And so, of course, they got engaged. They lost a million people during the war with Iraq. And they got a long and unprotectable, unsecurable border. So it was in their vital interest to be deeply involved inside Iraq. They tolerated our attacks on the Baathists. They were happy we captured Saddam Hussein. But they're building up their own network of influence. And to cement it, they occasionally give some military assistance and training and advice either directly or indirectly to both the insurgents and to the militias. And in that sense, it's not exactly parallel because there has been, I believe, continuous Iranian engagement. Some of it legitimate. Some of it illegitimate. I mean, you can hardly fault Iran because they're offering to do eye operations for Iraqis who need medical attention. That's not an offense that you can go to war over, perhaps. But it is an effort to gain influence. The administration has stubbornly refused to talk Iran about their perception, in part because they don't want to pay the price with their domestic our U. Domestic political base, the right wing base, but also because they don't want to legitimate a government that they've been trying to overthrow. If you were Iran, you'd probably believe that you were mostly already at war with The United States anyway since we've asserted that their government needs regime change. So and we've asked congress to appropriate $75,000,000 to do it, and we are supporting terrorist groups apparently who are infiltrating and blowing up things inside Iraq Iran. And if we're not doing it, let's put it this way, we're probably cognizant of it and encouraging it. So it's not surprising that we're moving to a point of confrontation crisis with Iran. My point on this is not that the Iranians are good guys, they're not, but that you shouldn't use force except as a last, last, last resort. There is a military option, but it's a bad one. Speaker 0: I wanted to get your response to Seymour Hirsch's piece in The New Yorker to two key points this week. Reporting the Pentagon's established a special planning group within the office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to plan a bomb bombing attack on Iran, that this is coming as the Bush administration and Saudi Arabia are pumping money for covert operations into many areas of the Middle East, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran in an effort to strengthen Saudi supported Sunni Islam groups and weaken Iranian backed Shias. Some of the covert money has been given to jihadist groups in Lebanon with ties to Al Qaeda. Fighting the Shias by funding with Prince Bandar and then with US money not approved by Congress funding the Sunnis connected to Al Qaeda? Speaker 1: Well, I don't have any direct information to confirm it or deny it. It it's certainly plausible. The Saudis have taken a more active role. You know, the the Saudis Speaker 0: You were just in Saudi Arabia? Mhmm. You just came back Speaker 1: from Saudi Arabia? The Saudis have basically recognized that they have an enormous stake in the outcome in Iraq, and they don't particularly trust the judgment of The United States in this area. We haven't exactly proved our competence in Iraq. So they're trying to take matters into their own hands. The real danger is, and one of the reasons this is so complicated, is because let's say we did follow the desires of some people who say, just pull out and pull out now. Well, yeah, we we could mechanically do that. It would be ugly and it might take three or four months, but you could line up the battalions on the road one by one, and you could put the gunners and the Humvees and cock load and cock their weapons and shoot their way out of Iraq. You'd have a few roadside bombs, but if you line everybody up, there won't be any roadside bombs, maybe some sniping. You can fly helicopters over, do your air cover. You probably get safely out of there. But when you leave, the Saudis have gotta find someone to fight the Shias. Who are they gonna find? Al Qaeda. Because the groups of Sunnis who would be extremist and willing to fight would probably be the groups connected to Al Qaeda. So one of the weird inconsistencies in this is that were we to get out early, we'd be intensifying the threat against us of a super powerful Sunni extremist group which was now legitimated by overt Saudi funding in an effort to hang on to a a toehold inside Iraq and block Iranian expansionism. Speaker 0: And interestingly today, John Negroponte has just become the number two man, resigning his post as national intelligence director, to go to the State Department. Seymour Hirsch says because of his discomfort that the administration's covert actions in The Middle East so closely echo the Iran Contra scandal of the nineteen eighties and Negra Ponte was involved with that. Speaker 1: Well, I'm sure there are lot of reasons why John would go back to the State Department. John's a good he's a good man. But, you know, the question is in government is can you are you bigger than your job? Because if you're not bigger than your job, you get trapped by the pressures of events and processes into going along with actions that you know you shouldn't. And I don't know. I don't know why he left the national intelligence director's position. He started in the State Department. Maybe he's got a fondness to return and finish off his career in state. Speaker 0: Can you talk about do you know who the generals are who are threatening to resign Speaker 1: No. I don't. If No. Speaker 0: The United States And I Speaker 1: don't want know. Speaker 0: Do you agree with them? Speaker 1: Well, I'll put it this way. In on Labor Day weekend of nineteen ninety four, when I was the J five, I was a three star general. I was in the Pentagon, and and it was a Saturday morning. And so I was in the Walt Cross was the director of the joint staff and he was in the office. Think it was either Hal Elestis or Jack Sheehan who was the J-three at the time. The three of us, I think it was Jack still in the job for the last couple of days. And the three of us were in Shali Kashvili's office about 11:00 in the morning on a Saturday morning, and he had just come back from a White House meeting. And he was all fired up and the way that Shali could be. And he said, so, he said, we will see who will be the real soldiers this weekend. There is much work to be done. This operation on Haiti has to be completed. The planning must be done correctly, and it must be done this weekend so we will see who are the real soldiers. And then the phone buzzed, and he got up from this little roundtable the four of us were sitting at to take the call from the White House. We sort of looked at each other. We said, gosh, I wonder where this came from. I mean, we were all getting ready to check out of the building in an hour or so. We finished off the messages and paperwork, and we just usually got together because there was normally a crisis every Saturday anyway. So we normally would come in for the Saturday morning crisis. And so Charlie came back, and and and so I said to him, I said, well, sir, we've been talking amongst ourselves and we're happy to work all weekend to get all this done. But this is just a drill, right, on Haiti? He looked at me and he said, Wes, he said, this is no drill. He said, I'm not authorized to tell you this. But he said, the decision has been made and The United States will invade Haiti. The date is the twentieth, I think it was his date, of the September 20. And the planning must be done, and it must be done now. And if any of you have reservations about this, this is the time to leave. So I looked at at Jack and I looked at Walt. They looked at me. And I mean, we kind of shrugged our shoulders and said, okay, if you want to invade Haiti, I mean, it's not illegal. It's not the country we'd most like to invade. The opposition there consists of five armored vehicles. And but sure. I mean, if the president says to do it, yeah, we're not gonna resign over it. And so we didn't resign. Nobody resigned. But Charlie was a very smart man. He knew. He was bigger than his job and he knew that you had to ask yourself the moral, legal, and ethical questions first. And so I'm encouraged by the fact that some of these generals have said this about Iran. They should be asking these questions first. Speaker 0: General Wesley Clark, he says he thinks about running for president again every day. We'll come back to my interview with him in a minute. Speaker 6: One, and he's only 17. He's been a soldier for a thousand years. He's a Catholic, a Hindu, an atheist, a Jew. And he knows he shouldn't kill, and he knows he Speaker 3: always will kill you. For me, Speaker 6: my friend, and me for you. And he's fighting for Canada. He's fighting for France. He's fighting for The USA. And he's fighting for the Russians, and he's fighting for Japan. And he thinks we'll put an end to war this way. He's fighting for democracy if he Speaker 0: Buffy St. Marie, Universal here on democracynow, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. I'm Amy Goodman as we go back to my interview with general Wesley Clark. What about the soldiers who are saying no to going to Iraq right now? Iraq? To going to Iraq. People like first lieutenant Aaron Wattada, first commissioned officer to say no to deploy. And he they just declared a mistrial. And as court marshal, he will face another court marshal in a few weeks. What do you think of these young men and women? There are now thousands who are refusing. But for example, Aaron Wattata, who says he feels it's wrong. He feels it's illegal and immoral, and he doesn't want to lead men and women there. Speaker 1: Well, I think it's you know, he's certainly made a personally courageous statement, and he'll pay for the con he'll pay with the consequences of it. Speaker 0: Do you think he should have to go to jail for that? Speaker 1: Well, I think that you have to have an effective armed forces. And I think that it's not up to the men and women in the armed forces to choose where they'll go to war. Because at the very time you need the armed forces the most is there'll be a certain number of people who will see it the other way. And so I support his right to refuse to go, and I support the government's effort to bring charges against him. This is the way the system works. Now, the difference is the case that I described with Charlie Kashpile is we would have been given the chance to retire. We would have left our jobs. We might not have retired as three star generals because we hadn't done our duty. But we weren't in the same circumstance that he is, so there wasn't necessarily going to be charges brought against us. But an armed forces has to have discipline. It's not a it's a voluntary organization to join, but it's not voluntary unless it's illegal. And you can bring the the the trouble with Iraq is it's not illegal. It was authorized by the United States Congress. It was authorized by the United Nations Security Council resolution. It's an illegitimate war, but not an illegal war. Speaker 0: Do you think it's wrong? Speaker 1: It's wrong to fight in Iraq? Well, think it's a mistake. I think it's a bad strategy. I think it's brought us a lot of grief and will bring us a lot more grief. I think it's been a tremendous distraction from the war on terror, diversion of resources, and it's reinforced our enemies. But on the other hand, his case is a moral case, not a legal case. And if you're going to be a conscientious objector morally like this, then what makes it commendable is that you'll take your stand on principle and pay the price. If there's no price to be paid for it, then the courage of your act isn't self evident. So he's taken a very personally courageous stand. But on the other hand, you have to also appreciate the fact that the armed forces has to be able to function. So, you know, in World War I in France, there were a series of terribly misplaced offensives. And they brought they failed again and again and again. The French took incredible losses. And these were these were conscript armies. And after one of these failures, a group of thousands of soldiers simply said, we're not doing this again. It's wrong. You know what the French did? They did what they called decimation. They lined up the troops. They took every tenth soldier, and they shot them. Now the general who ordered that, he suffered some severe repercussions personally, morally. But after that, the soldiers in France didn't disobey. Had the army disintegrated at that point, Germany would have occupied France. So when you're dealing with the use of force, there is an element of compulsion in the armed forces. Speaker 0: But if the politicians will not stop it, as you pointed out, the Democrats joined with the Republicans in authorizing the war, then it's quite significant, I think, that you, as a general, are saying that this man has taken a courageous act. Then it's up to the people who are being sent to go to say no. Speaker 1: Yeah. But what the courage that we need is not his courage. We need the courage of the leaders in the United States government. The generals who could affect the policy, the people in congress who could force the president to change his strategy Speaker 0: How could they Speaker 1: do that? The current. That's the courage that's needed. Speaker 0: And how could they do that? Speaker 1: Well, you start with a nonbinding resolution in the United States congress and you build your momentum from there. And you keep hammering it. You you the congress has three principal powers. It has a power to appoint, power to investigate, power to fund. And you go after all three on all three fronts. You find out what the president needs until he takes it seriously. I think it's a difficult maneuver to to use a scalpel and say, we're we're gonna support funding, but we're not gonna support funding for the surge because that's requiring a degree of micromanagement that congress can't do. But you can certainly put enough squeeze on the president that he finally calls in the leaders of the congress and says, okay. Okay. What's it gonna take? I've gotta get my White House budget passed. I've gotta get 30 judges, federal judges confirmed. I've gotta get these these federal prosecutors, you know, the ones that I caused to resign so I could handle it. They've got to get replacements in place. What do I have to do to to get some support here? I mean, it could be done. It's hard, bare knuckle government. Speaker 0: Do you think congress should stop funding the war? Speaker 1: I think congress should take a strong stand to get the strategy changed. I don't think that if you cut off funding for the war, it's in the right now, that's not in The United States' interest. What is in The United States' interest is to change the strategy in the war. You cannot succeed by simply stopping the funding and saying you've got six months to get the Americans out. That's not gonna end the misery in Iraq. It's not gonna restore the lives of that have been lost, and it's not gonna give us the power in the region to prevent later threats. What we do have to do is have a strategy that uses all the elements of America's power, diplomatic, economic, legal, and and military. I would send a high level diplomatic team into the region. Right now, I'd have no holds barred and no preconditioned discussion with Iran and Syria. And I would let it be known that I've got in my bag all the tricks including putting another 50,000 troops in Iraq and pulling all 150,000 troops out. And we're going to reach an agreement on a statement of principles that brings stability and peace and order to the region. Let's just sit down and start doing it. That could be done with the right administrative leadership. It just hasn't been done. Think of it this way. You're on a ship crossing the Atlantic. It's a new ship and it's at night. And you're looking out ahead of the ship, and you notice that there's a part of the horizon. It's a beautiful starry night, except that there's a part of the horizon and sort of irregular hump out there where there are no stars visible. And you notice as the ship plows through the water at 30 knots that this area where there are no stars is getting larger. And finally it hits you that there must be something out there that's blocking the starlight, like an iceberg. So you run to the captain and you say, captain, captain, there's an iceberg and we're driving right toward it. And he says, look, I can't be bothered with the iceberg right now. We're having an argument about the number of deck chairs on the fore deck versus the aft deck. And and you say, but you're gonna hit an iceberg. He says, I'm sorry. Get out of here. So you go to the first officer, and he says, I'm fighting with the captain on the number of deck chairs. You know, we're approaching an iceberg in The Middle East in our policy. And we've got congress and The United States and the president of The United States fighting over troop strength in Iraq. It's the wrong issue. The issue is the strategy, not the troop strength. Speaker 0: General Clark, do you think Guantanamo Bay should be closed? Speaker 1: Absolutely. If Speaker 0: congress cut off funds for the prison there, it would be closed, should they? Speaker 1: Well, I think the first thing congress should do is repeal the Military Commissions Act. I'm very disturbed that a number of people who are looking at the highest office in the land have supported an act which advertently or inadvertently authorizes the admission into evidence of information gained through torture. That's not the America that I believe in. And the America that I believe in doesn't detain people indefinitely without charges. So I'd start with the military commissions act. Then I'd get our NATO allies into the act. They they they've said they don't like Guantanamo either. So I'd like to create an international tribunal, not a kangaroo court of military commissions, and let's go back through the evidence and let's lay it out. Who are these people that have been held down there? And what have they been held for? And which ones can be released? And which ones should be tried in court and convicted? You see, essentially, you cannot win the war on terror by military force. It is first and foremost a battle of ideas. It is secondly a a law enforcement effort, a cooperative effort among nations. And only as a last resort do you use military force. This president has distorted the capabilities of the United States Armed Forces. He's used our men and women in uniform improperly in Guantanamo and engaged in actions that I think are totally against the uniform code of military justice and against what we stand for as the American people. Speaker 0: Do you think that president Bush should be impeached? Well, Speaker 1: I think we ought to do first things first, which is we really need to understand and finish the job that congress started with respect to the Iraq war investigation. We were do you remember that there was gonna be a study released by the senate, that the senator from Iowa or from Kansas who was the Republican head of the senate intelligence committee, was going to, do this study to determine whether the administration had in fact misused the intelligence information to mislead us into the war with Iraq. Well, I've never seen that study. I'd like to know where that study is. I'd like to know why we've spent three years investigating Scooter Libby when we should have been investigating why this country went to war in Iraq. The Speaker 0: the Center for Constitutional Rights has filed a complaint against Donald Rumsfeld, General Miller and others in a German court because they have universal jurisdiction. Do you think that Donald Rumsfeld should be tried for war crimes? Speaker 1: Well, I'd like to see what the evidence is against Rumsfeld. I do know this, that there was a lot of pressure put on the men and women in uniform to come up with intelligence. I remember, I think it was either General Sanchez or General Abizaid who stated that we don't need more troops. This is the 2003. We just need better information. Well, to me that was immediate code words that we were really trying to soak these people for information. It's only a short step from there to all the kinds of mistreatment that occur at places like Abu Ghraib. So we know that Al Gonzalez wrote a couple of really or authored or his people authored and he approved a couple of outrageous memos that attempted to define torture as deliberately inflicted pain the equivalent of the loss of a major bodily organ or limb, which is it's not an adequate definition of torture. And we know that he authorized to some degree some coercive methods which we haven't. And we know president Bush himself accepted implicitly an assigning statement to a 2,005 act on military detainees that he would use whatever methods were appropriate or necessary. There's been some official condoning of these actions. I think it's a violation of international law and a violation of American law and a violation of the principles of good government in America. There have always been evidences of mistreatment of prisoners. Every army has probably done it in history. But our country hasn't ever done it as a matter of deliberate policy. George Washington told his soldiers when they captured the Hessians and the men wanted to run them through because the Hessians were brutal and ruthless, He said, no. Treat them well. He said, they'll join our side. And many of them did. It was a smart policy. Not only the right thing to do, but a smart policy to treat the enemy well. We've made countless enemies in that part of the world by the way we've treated people and disregarded them. It's bad, bad policy. Speaker 0: I wanted to ask you're a Fox News contributor now? Speaker 1: Oh, at least. Speaker 0: I wanted to ask you what you think of the dean of West Point, Brigadier General Patrick Finnegan, together with a military interrogator known named Tony Lagranas and the group Human Rights First. Going to the heads of the program 24, very popular hit show on, Fox, to tell them that what they're doing on this program, glorifying torture, is inspiring young men and women to go to Iraq and torture soldiers there and to stop it. Speaker 1: And not only that, but it doesn't work. Yeah. Pat Finnegan is one of my heroes. Speaker 0: So what do you think about that? And have you been involved in the conversation at Fox, which runs 24, to stop it? Speaker 1: Well, as far as I know, they've they actually put out a call to all the writers in Hollywood. My son's a writer, he was one of them who got a call. It it they were all told, stop talking about torture. It doesn't work. So I think it's it was an effective move by Pat Finnegan. Speaker 0: So you support it? Absolutely. General Wesley Clark. I'm interviewing him at the 90 Second Street. Why? We're gonna come back to the conclusion of that interview in a minute. Speaker 6: 19 miles to Baghdad. What have I Speaker 0: democracynowdemocracynow.org, the war and peace report. I'm Amy Goodman. General Wesley Clark recently edited a series of books about famous US generals, Grant, LeMay, Patton, and Eisenhower. When I interviewed him at the 90 Second Street Y, I asked him a question about the presidency of general Dwight Eisenhower. 1953 was also a seminal date for today. And that was when Kermit Roosevelt, the grandson of Teddy Roosevelt, went to Iran and led a coup against Mohammed Mosaddegh under Eisenhower. Speaker 1: People make mistakes. And one of the one of the mistakes that The United States consistently made was that it could intervene and somehow adjust people's governments, especially in the Middle East. I don't know why we felt that you can understand Latin America because Latin America was always an area in which people would come to The United States and say, you've got to help us down there. These are bounditos, and they don't know anything. And, you know, they don't have a government. Just intervene and save our property. And The United States did it a lot in the twenties. Of course, Eisenhower was part of that culture. He'd seen it. But in The Middle East, we'd never been there. We established a relationship during World War two, of course, to keep the Germans out of Iran. And so the Soviets and the Brits put an allied mission together. At the end of World War two, the Soviets didn't want to resign re withdraw. And, Truman called their bluff in the United Nations. And Eisenhower knew all of this, and and and Iran somehow became incorporated into the American defense perimeter. And so, his view would have been we couldn't allow a communist to take over. Speaker 0: But what's it more Speaker 1: about British petroleum? Speaker 0: What isn't it more about British petroleum? Speaker 1: Oh, it's always there are always interests. The truth is about The Middle East is had there been no oil there, it would be like Africa. Nobody is threatening to intervene in Africa. The problem is the opposite. We keep asking for people to intervene and stop it. And there's there's no question that the presence of petroleum throughout the region has sparked great power involvement. Whether that was the specific motivation for the coup or not, I can't tell you. But but there was definitely there's always been this attitude that somehow we could intervene and use force in the region. I mean, that that was true with I mean, imagine us arming and creating the mujahideen to keep the Soviets out of Afghanistan. Why would we think we could do that? But we did. And, you know, my lesson on it is whenever you use force, there are unintended consequences. So you should use force as a last resort. Whether it's overt or covert, you pay enormous consequences for using force. Speaker 0: I wanted to ask you about what you think of the response to Jimmy Carter's book, Peace Not Apartheid. Speaker 1: Well, I'm sorry to say I haven't read the book. And it's one of the things I've been meaning to read, and I just haven't. I will tell you this, that we're in a very, very difficult position in Israel. I say we because every American president has committed to the protection and survival of the state of Israel. And I think that's right. And I certainly feel that way. And I'm a very strong supporter of Israel. But somehow we've got to move off top dead center in terms of these discussions with the Palestinians. And this administration has failed to lead. They came into office basically determined not to do anything that Bill Clinton did. I think that was the basic guideline. And so they have allowed unremitting violence between Israel and the Palestinians with hardly an effort to stop that through US leadership. And now it's almost too late. So Condie was over there the other day, and she didn't achieve what she wanted to achieve. And people want to blame the Saudis, but at least the Saudis tried to do something at Mecca by putting together a unity government. So I fault the administration. Jimmy Carter's taken a lot of heat from people. I don't know exactly what he said in the book, but people are very sensitive about Israel in this country. And I understand that. My a lot of my friends have explained it to me and explained to me the psychology of people who were in this country and saw what was happening in World War II, and maybe they didn't feel like they spoke out strongly enough, soon enough to stop it. And it's not gonna happen again. Speaker 0: General Clark, I wanted to ask you a tough question that about journalists. Speaker 1: Well, that would be the first tough question you've asked me tonight. Speaker 0: There are more than a 100 journalists and media workers in Iraq who have died. And particularly hard hit are Arab journalists. I mean, you had Tariq A'yub, the Al Jazeera reporter who died on the roof of Al Jazeera when the US military shelled Al Jazeera, then went on to shell the Palestine hotel and killed two reporters, a Reuters cameraman and one from Tele Cinco in in Spain named Jose Coso. Many Arab journalists feel like they have been targeted, the idea of shooting the messenger. But this tough question goes back to, your being supreme, allied commander in Yugoslavia and the bombing of radio television Serbia. Do you regret that that happened? Speaker 1: No. I don't regret that at all. And that was part of the Serb command and control network. And not only that, I was asked to take out that television by a lot of important political leaders. And before I took it out, I twice warned the Serbs we were gonna take it out. We stopped, at one news conference in the Pentagon. We planted the question to to get the attention of the Serbs that we were gonna target Serb radio and television. Speaker 0: Our Speaker 1: defense. Yeah. And that night, in fact, Milosevic got the warning because he summoned all the foreign journalists to come to a special mandatory party at at at RTS that night. But we weren't bombing that night. We put the word out twice before we actually did it. Speaker 0: You told CNN, which was also there, to leave? Speaker 1: I told I used I think I used CNN to plant the story and to leak it at the Pentagon press conference. But we didn't we didn't tell anyone specifically to leave. What we told them was it's now a target. And it was Milosevic who determined that he would keep people there in the middle of the night just so there'd be someone killed if we struck it. So we struck it during the hours where there were not supposed to be anybody there. Speaker 0: But you killed civilians. Speaker 1: Six people died. Speaker 0: I think 16. But I think it's the media where it's the beauticians, the technicians. Speaker 1: Yeah. They were they were ordered to stay there by Milosevic. Yeah. Speaker 0: But it was a civilian target. Speaker 1: It was not a civilian target. It was a military target. It was part of the Serb command and control network. Speaker 0: What do you think of Amnesty International calling it a war crime? Speaker 1: Well, I think it was investigated by the criminal tribunal on Yugoslavia and found to be a legitimate target. So I think it's perfectly alright for Amnesty International to have their say. But everything we did was approved by lawyers, and every target was blessed. Speaker 0: But upon reflection not Speaker 1: have committed a war crime. Speaker 0: Upon reflection now and knowing who died there, the young people, the people who worked for RTS, who, as you said, if Milosevic wanted people to stay there, they were just following orders? Speaker 1: Well, it was a tragedy. But I'll tell you something. If you wanna talk about tragedies, how about this one? We bombed what we thought was a Serb police station in Kosovo. We saw the Serb vehicles. We flew unmanned aerial vehicles over it, and and we did everything we could to identify it. And we found that there were Serb police vehicles parked there at night. So we sent an f 16 in, dropped two five hundred pound laser guided bombs, and took it out. We killed 80 Albanians who'd been imprisoned by the Serbs there. They were trying to escape, and the Serbs locked them up in this farmhouse and surrounded them with vehicles. So, I regret every single innocent person who died, and I prayed every night that there wouldn't be any innocent people who died. But this is why I say you must use force only as a last resort. I told the story to the high school kids earlier, but it bears repeating, I guess. We had a malfunction with a cluster bomb unit, and a couple of grenades fell on a schoolyard. And some three, I think, three schoolchildren were killed in Nis. And two weeks later, I got a letter from a Serb grandfather. He said, you killed my granddaughter. He said, I hate you for this, and I'll kill you. And, I got this in the middle of the war, and it made me very, very sad. We certainly never wanted to do anything like that. But in war, accidents happen. And that's why you shouldn't undertake military operations unless every other alternative has been exhausted because innocent people do die. And, I think the United States military was as humane and careful as it possibly could have been in the Kosovo campaign. But still civilians died. And I'll always regret that. Speaker 0: Do you think cluster bombs should be banned? Speaker 1: You know, we used, I think, 1,400 plus cluster bombs. And there's a time when you have to use cluster bombs, when they're the most appropriate and humane weapon. But I think you have to control the use very carefully. And I think we did in Yugoslavia. Speaker 0: Right now, The US has rejected an international call to ban the use of cluster bombs. On Friday, 46 countries were in Oslo to develop a new international treaty to ban the use of cluster munitions by, I think it's 02/2008. Would you support that? Speaker 1: Well, you know, people who are against war often make the case by trying to attack the weapons of war and stripping away the legitimacy of those weapons. I participated in some of that. I'd like to get rid of landmines. I did I did participate in getting rid of laser blinding weapons, and I was part of the team that put together the agreement that got rid of laser blinding weapons. I like to get rid of nuclear weapons. But I can't agree with those who say that force has no place in international affairs. It simply does for this country. And I would like to work to make it so that it doesn't. But the truth is, for now, it does. And so I can't go against giving our men and women in uniform the appropriate weapons they need to fight, to fight effectively, to succeed on the battlefield, and to minimize their own casualties. Speaker 3: Well, we'll have to leave it there. Speaker 0: I thank you very much, general Wesley Clark. Speaker 1: Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you. Speaker 0: General Wesley Clark. I interviewed him at the 90 Second Street Y, the cultural center here in New York on the publication of the great general series and Grant, LeMay, Patton, and Eisenhower. If you'd like a copy of this exclusive interview, you can go to our website at democracynow.0rg. You can get a DVD, or you can watch, listen to, or read the transcript at our website. On Monday, we'll be interviewing war correspondent Robert Fisk in our firehouse studio. He's a recipient of the 2006 Lannan Lifetime Achievement Prize for Cultural Freedom. On Sunday, March 4 at 7PM, he'll be speaking at New York's town hall on West 40 Third Street. Democracy Now is produced by Mike Burke, Sharifoglou Koduz, John Hamilton, Elizabeth Press, Yoruba Richin, Erin Mate, Jen Yutz, Anuradha Bagwati, Megan Whitney, Mike DeFilippo, Nick Marcello, Miguel Negara are our engineers. Special thanks to Jenny Filippazo, Tim Kepler, and Dennis Moynihan. Thanks also to Angela Alston, Uri Gahlad, Rebecca Silver, Kieran Krug Meadows, Jerome Bourgeois, Tory Townsend, and Samantha Chamblay. Again, if you go to our website at democracynow.0rg, you can sign up for our daily headlines and media alerts and find out about the stories that we are working on in the coming days. Democracynow.0rg. I'm Amy Goodman. Thanks for joining us.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/df7SDM9vDA

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵 3. Afghan Mujahideen — How U.S. Policy Created a Militarized | Proxy Ecosystem President Ronald Reagan's Remarks and Chairman Yunis Khalis Remarks Following a Meeting With Afghan Resistance Leaders and Members of Congress in Roosevelt Room Origin: 1979–1989 (Soviet–Afghan War) U.S. role: Direct CIA funding, weapons transfers (including FIM-92 Stinger missiles), training, and covert programs routed through Pakistan’s ISI and Gulf partners. These were explicit, long-running policy choices intended to arm Afghan resistance against the USSR. Outcome: A heavily armed, politically fragmented insurgent ecosystem that later reconstituted into multiple militant actors (including groups that later joined or inspired Islamist movements and insurgencies). The mujahideen era created the weapons, logistics, cross-border sanctuaries, and combat culture that ruined Afghan state institutions and normalized militant proxy warfare. The policy: a presidential finding and Operation Cyclone • Fact: On 3 July 1979 a presidential finding authorized CIA support for Afghan insurgents. This began a formal, state policy of covert support. • Fact: The CIA’s covert program, commonly called Operation Cyclone (1979–1992), became one of the longest and most expensive covert actions in CIA history — explicitly to arm and finance the mujahideen. • Intent: The program’s declared aim was to “bleed” Soviet influence by sustaining Afghan resistance. That was the objective policymakers signed off on — not vague assistance but overt proxy warcraft. Money and materiel at scale • Fact: U.S. funding rose from under $1 million in 1979 to hundreds of millions per year in the mid-1980s; estimates show hundreds of millions to over half a billion per year at peak. The U.S., Saudi Arabia and Pakistan together channeled billions into the conflict. • Fact: By 1986 the U.S. provided high-tech weaponry such as the FIM-92 Stinger man-portable air-defense system; roughly 2,300 Stingers were shipped or transferred into the theater over the course of the program. Stingers decisively altered battlefield dynamics by neutralizing Soviet rotary and fixed-wing air superiority. The Pakistan conduit and selection of proxies • Fact: U.S. aid was routed through Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). Pakistan’s ISI chose which Afghan commanders and factions received the lion’s share of support. • Effect: The ISI’s choices favored Islamist factions close to Zia-ul-Haq’s regime; crates, training and safe havens were allocated to groups that fit Pakistani strategic preferences, producing uneven empowerment among rebel factions. Training, networks and foreign volunteers • Fact: The covert effort built training camps, logistics pipelines, and cross-border sanctuaries on both sides of the Durand Line; these facilities trained Afghans and hosted foreign volunteers (Arab and other international fighters), creating transnational militant networks. (Field histories; Steve Coll; Peter Bergen) • Effect: The region’s militancy became transnational — fighters, ideas and tactics flowed from Afghan battlefields to other conflicts afterward. Tactical consequences — militarization and fragmentation • Fact: The flood of weapons and irregular training produced a heavily militarized society and empowered local warlords and factional leaders after the Soviet withdrawal. When Moscow left, those armed groups fought each other for control, shelling Kabul and destroying centralized governance. (Post-1989 Afghan civil war records) • Effect: A fractured polity and debilitated institutions made sustainable governance impossible and normalized the use of armed irregulars as political instruments. Not accidental blowback — a predictable result of explicit policy choices • Fact: U.S. policy makers explicitly prioritized defeating the Soviets using covert means — routing funds through Pakistan, arming ideologically committed factions, and supplying advanced systems (e.g., Stingers). These were deliberate, strategic decisions. • Fact: Numerous contemporaneous and retrospective observers (Pakistani leaders, U.S. diplomats, scholars) warned the U.S. about long-term risks; yet funding and transfers continued at scale. That sequence — intentional armament + choice of proxies + disregard for long-term stability — produced predictable outcomes that were foreseeable to policymakers. Legacy — why “ending terror” was never possible under this model • Fact: The mujahideen period institutionalized proxy war: permanent networks of fighters, caches of sophisticated weapons, madrassa recruitment pipelines and cross-border sanctuaries. These durable structures made periodic emergence of militant groups inevitable. (Historical analyses; Steve Coll; academic reviews) • Conclusion from the record (fact-based): When state policy deliberately builds militant capacity abroad for short-term geopolitical aims, it creates persistent militant ecosystems that are hard to extinguish — sustained violence becomes the default outcome, not an unforeseen accident. Considering that the US has continued to heavily fund these militant groups, it's clear that this is a deliberate M.O.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 described a moving meeting with chairman Eunice Khalis of the Islamic Union of Mujahideen of Afghanistan and others, noting continued strong U.S. support for the resistance and satisfaction with unity in choosing a chairman for the first time. The milestone demonstrates unity; the mujahideen have improved capabilities. Khalis’ delegation visits Washington after the November 10 UN General Assembly vote calling overwhelmingly for the withdrawal of all foreign troops from Afghanistan—the eighth such call since December. The withdrawal of Soviet forces is the key to resolving the Afghan crisis. The United States will strengthen support, aiming for "a genuinely independent Afghanistan, free from external interference, an Afghanistan whose people choose the type of government they wish, an Afghanistan to which the 4,000,000 refugees from Soviet aggression may return in safety and, yes, in honor." You are a nation of heroes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, we've just held a very useful, and I might say brief, but also I will add a very moving discussion with chairman Eunice Khalis of the Islamic Union of Mujahideen of Afghanistan and other members of his distinguished delegation. I expressed our nation's continued strong support for the resistance and our satisfaction with the large step the Afghan resistance took toward unity in choosing a chairman for the first time. This new political milestone demonstrates that the people of Afghanistan speak with one voice in their opposition to the Soviet invasion and occupation of their homeland. This increasing unity has already made itself felt on the battlefield. During the past eighteen months, the mujahideen fighting inside the country have improved their weapons, tactics, and coordination. The result has been a a string of serious defeats for the Soviet elite units as well as many divisions from the Kabul army. Chairman Collies and his delegation are visiting Washington following the November 10 UN General Assembly vote, which, with a record vote once again, called overwhelmingly for the withdrawal of all foreign troops from Afghanistan. This is the eighth time since the December that the general assembly has decisively called upon the Soviet Union to pull its forces out of Afghanistan. And let there be no mistake about it, the withdrawal of Soviet forces is the key to resolving the Afghan crisis. Our other issues that have been raised to divert attention from this fact only extend the combat and prolong the suffering of the Afghan people. General secretary Gorbachev has publicly stated a Soviet readiness to withdraw. Both in April and September 1987, I asked the Soviet Union to set a date this year when that withdrawal would begin. I also stated that when the Soviet Union showed convincingly that it was ready for a genuine political settlement, The United States would be helpful. After all, the Soviet presence in Afghanistan is a major impediment to improve US Soviet relations, and we would like to remove it. The Soviets should want to do so as well. Unfortunately, the Soviet answer on a date for rapid withdrawal has been silence. Instead, we've seen the Kabul regime announce a phantom ceasefire and propose a transitional government, one that would leave this discredited and doomed group in control. These gambits have been rejected by the only voice that really counts, that of the Afghan people speaking through their resistance representatives. Any proposal unacceptable to the resistance is destined to fail. And as the resistance continues the fight, we and other responsible governments will stand by it. The support that The United States has been providing the resistance will be strengthened rather than diminished so that it can continue to fight effectively for freedom. A just struggle against foreign tyranny can count upon worldwide support, both political and material. The goal of The United States remains a genuinely independent Afghanistan, free from external interference, an Afghanistan whose people choose the type of government they wish, an Afghanistan to which the 4,000,000 refugees from Soviet aggression may return in safety and, yes, in honor. On behalf of the American people, I salute chairman Kalis, his delegation, and the people of Afghanistan themselves. You are a nation of heroes. Speaker 1: In the name of God, merciful and compassionate. As far as the Afghan problem is concerned, the president has shed light on some important points. I have no doubt that The US promises of support and commitment to the Afghan cause will be honored in the future as it has been in the past. I'm grateful for the opportunity to express the voice of the Afghan people to the world. This is an important opportunity for us. In Afghanistan, we have have more than 1,000,000 martyrs, and many children have been killed. Villages have been destroyed, and the war continues and intensifies. In the face of these sacrifices or these costs, we have continued our resistance, and we shall continue to do so. We the morale of our resistance is very high, and we shall continue with our struggle. Although the United Nations overwhelmingly has called for the withdrawal of the Soviet troops, unconditional withdrawal of Soviet troops, but the Soviets have continued the war, and this war, in our view, is likely to continue. In our view, the struggle in Afghanistan is not only for Afghanistan. The Soviets are using Afghanistan as a base for training their forces and using their weapons, but they also would like to use Afghanistan, should they be victorious, as a base from which they will threaten the Persian Gulf, the Middle East, and western interests in general. This is therefore an issue that involves not only the Afghans but the rest of the world, especially those who are seeking peace. As a result, it's important that these countries, we should continue their humanitarian and other support for the Afghan resistance and, in fact, should increase it. In Afghanistan, it's only the Afghan people that should determine the future government. We do not accept any right on this issue and do not accept interference by anyone as far as this issue is concerned. The world should rest assured that no matter what kind of regime the Afghans establish out of their own free will, that regime will not threaten anyone's interest and shall observe all international laws and live in peace with all its neighbors. And once again, want to reiterate that our struggle shall continue until the Soviets leave Afghanistan and until a government that the Afghans accept comes to power. We do not accept the preferences of others as far as our government is concerned. But we also would like to point out that we would like increased political support and recognition for our movement consistent with increased military achievements that we have on the battlefield. And then I'd like to call on the on the press to give adequate and and and correct information and analysis of what goes on in Afghanistan. That was the last point that the the chairman wants.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/KsgQA3PMZ6

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

The Origin of Terror🧵 4. ISIS / ISIL — How U.S. & zionist Policy Created a Global Terror Machine Origin: Early 2000s — grew from post-2003 Iraq insurgency; exploded during the Syrian civil war (2011+). Key Point: ISIS didn’t emerge spontaneously. It was deliberately cultivated by U.S. foreign policy aligned with zionist strategic goals — destabilizing the Middle East, consolidating power, and controlling enemies of israel. This was a calculated move to reshape the region in israel’s favor, leveraging chaos as a tool for dominance while arming terrorist cells to attack countries that resist zionist control. Netanyahu once accused the Saudis of sending Gaza money for influence over Hamas. Every accusation with Netanyahu is a confession; he did as well. Immediate Causes (Documented Facts): zionist-Planned Invasion (2003): PNAC, a zionist neocon think tank, mapped Iraq’s invasion in 1998. Goal: not just oil — destabilize the region to protect israel, reshape power dynamics, and justify perpetual U.S. presence. PNAC’s founders, including Wolfowitz and Feith, were dual israeli-U.S. citizens with deep ties to the israeli military. Sectarian Governance: U.S.-installed Iraqi government, influenced by zionist advisors like Ahmed Chalabi, systematically marginalized Sunnis — grievances that ISIS exploited. Chalabi, an Iraqi exile with ties to israeli intelligence, played a key role in shaping U.S. policy. Al-Qaeda in Iraq: Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s network, armed and trained via CIA remnants from Operation Cyclone, became ISIS’s operational core. Zarqawi’s fighters were initially backed by the CIA to destabilize Syria and Iran. Syrian Civil War (2011+): zionist-backed “regime change” efforts created safe havens for ISIS, HTS, and other jihadi factions. israel openly supported these groups as “moderate rebels” while bombing Syrian government forces. How ISIS Was Cultivated (Documented): Deliberate Dismantling: Bush-era neocons dissolved Iraqi institutions and army, creating a security vacuum designed to prevent any future Iraqi military challenge to israel. Proxy Wars: zionist-backed forces in Syria — including ex-Al-Qaeda affiliates — funneled weapons, fighters, and resources to ISIS. The CIA’s Operation Timber Sycamore, launched in 2012, supplied billions of dollars in arms to these groups. Financing ISIS: Gulf private donors connected to zionist networks, and international banks (Goldman Sachs, etc.) enabled ISIS access to cash, oil revenue, and smuggling profits. ISIS oil was sold through Turkey, with israeli companies acting as middlemen. Direct Obama-Era Support: Direct ISIS Funding: The Obama Administration knowingly allowed ISIS to sell oil to Turkey, with israeli companies acting as intermediaries. This wasn’t just indirect funding — ISIS directly profited from U.S.-enabled oil sales. Later sanctions were largely symbolic, doing nothing to disrupt the flow of resources. State-Sponsored Terrorism: The Obama Administration greenlit Qatar and Saudi Arabia’s funding of extremist groups that became ISIS, under the guise of “moderate rebel support.” U.S. Training for ISIS: ISIS commanders were trained in Jordan, receiving military skills they later used to expand the caliphate. This was direct U.S. support for ISIS leadership and operational capacity. (Timber Sycamore) Financing ISIS: Gulf private donors connected to zionist networks, and international banks (Goldman Sachs, etc.) enabled ISIS access to cash, oil revenue, and smuggling profits. ISIS oil was sold through Turkey, with israeli companies acting as middlemen. Trump Administration ISIS Oil Sales: Trump failed to stop ISIS from selling oil to Turkey, effectively funding the group. Israeli companies acted as middlemen, ensuring ISIS profited directly from stolen Syrian oil. Even later sanctions were meaningless—what does a “sanction” do to a terrorist group already making millions from illicit sales? Proxy Wars: Trump escalated support for Saudi Arabia and the UAE in Yemen, indirectly funding extremist groups that later merged with ISIS. This allowed ISIS to maintain influence and recruit across the region. Biden Administration Syria Airstrikes: Biden’s 2021 airstrikes targeted “Iran-backed militias” but killed civilians, fueling ISIS recruitment. This was a propaganda victory handed to ISIS and affiliated rebels. Continued Proxy Funding: Biden continued arming Saudi Arabia and the UAE, indirectly sustaining extremist groups tied to ISIS in Yemen. Israeli Involvement (Documented/Reported): Mossad Operations: Leaked intel shows ISIS commanders trained near the Golan Heights. Mossad agents were caught by Russian forces in Syria while evacuating ISIS leaders. Medical Support: israel treated wounded jihadists in its hospitals, including high-ranking ISIS commanders. Strategic Coordination: israeli airstrikes targeted Assad forces, indirectly aiding ISIS and allied militias. israel also provided intelligence to these groups. The Assad Reality: Secular Government: Assad’s secular government protected minorities and resisted zionist-backed regime change. Majority Jihadi Fighters: Most Syrians opposing Assad in conflict zones were jihadi fighters funded and armed by israel and U.S. proxies. Double Standards: When these groups attack Syria, Lebanon, or resist israel — they’re labeled “terrorists.” When zionist networks fund and arm them — they’re called “rebels fighting for freedom.” Same fighters. Different PR. Big Picture: Engineered Chaos: ISIS was engineered, not accidental. Terror is a tool: U.S. & israel use jihadist proxies to weaken anti-zionist regimes, justify endless wars, and expand influence. Media Obfuscation: Western media obscures this, framing Assad as a tyrant and jihadis as “moderates.” Assad’s Resistance: Assad fought these same terror groups that israel funded. His forces have been the primary bulwark against ISIS expansion. Conclusion: ISIS and affiliated jihadi groups are products of zionist-aligned strategy and U.S. intervention. Chaos, terror, and regime destabilization are features, not bugs, of foreign policy. ISIS is not a natural phenomenon but a weapon of war crafted by zionist interests to reshape the Middle East. The next time you hear about “terror attacks,” remember — it’s not just random violence, it’s a calculated tool of zionist power.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Discussion centers on subversion and thwarting plots against the state of Israel and, publicly, what they call the Mossad. It was hard to answer because 'you can't pick up the phone book.' 'There's no, Langley in, in Israel'—so they couldn't simply look up 'CIA or Mossad.' They asked, 'What shall we call it in English?' 'Mossad is institute,' but they wondered, 'when they write a letter to their friends in the CIA or the British intelligence, what do they call themselves?' It took a while, 'a matter of asking the prime minister's spokesman,' since officially 'the Mossad is under the prime minister's office.' He 'sort of wondered why you wanna know and all that,' so they explained, and he came up with 'the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service.' 'If it were to have initials, it would be ISIS. Just simple words like that.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Them, subversion, trying to foil plots against the state of Israel, political plots, others. You tell the story about how you try to find out what the what they call the Mossad when they deal with, publicly? I thought it was a reasonable question, but the trouble is, you can't pick up the phone book. There's no, Langley in, in Israel, and you can look up, you know, CIA or in our case, the Mossad. We thought we should ask, What shall we call it in English? You can translate the Hebrew words, as I said, Mossad is institute, but when they write a letter to their friends in the CIA or the British intelligence, what do they call themselves? It took a while. It was a matter of asking the prime minister's spokesman, the best you could do because officially, the Mossad is under the prime minister's office. And I think he sort of wondered why you wanna know and all that, so we explained. And he came up with the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service. I mean, if it were to have initials, it would be ISIS. Just simple words like that.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/7zEVo28zYw

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵 5. HAMAS — Resistance & Israeli Occupation Origin (1987): Hamas emerged during the First Intifada as the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. Israeli occupation and U.S. complicity in land theft and dehumanization created the conditions for Hamas to thrive. Unlike the "rebel" groups armed by israel and the U.S., Hamas is a genuine resistance movement born from Palestinian suffering and the resistance of armed aggressive military occupation. Documented Israeli Role (1970s–1980s): Israel didn't just "permit" Hamas's growth—it actively cultivated it as a counterweight to secular Palestinian nationalism. Israeli officials licensed Hamas's founder, Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, to build mosques, schools, and charities in Gaza. This wasn’t a mistake; it was a calculated move to divide Palestinians and maintain israeli dominance while giving israel the ability to claim Hamas is using "human shields" and "putting bases under schools/hospitals" and similar tactics. From the start, Israel's plan was to divide Palestine by creating, funding and radicalizing terrorist cells within Palestine to justify attacking them - taking their land - and apparently, exterminating the entire population. As evidenced by their recent and numerous statements indicating that even if Hamas releases the hostages there will be no cease fire. Key israeli officials going all the way back to the beginning of the occupation stated public that their goal was the removal of all Arabs in israel. How That Policy Functioned: Legal Recognition: Israel gave Hamas's Islamic charity network (Mujama al-Islamiya) official status, allowing it to expand under israeli oversight. Strategic Funding: Some Hamas institutions received resources or approvals because israeli planners believed they would undermine the PLO/Fatah. Public Admission: Israeli insiders later admitted this was a deliberate strategy to weaken secular Palestinian leaders.📺🧵 Growth Into Politics & Governance: Social Welfare: Hamas built its base through funding schools, hospitals, and welfare programs—filling gaps left by Israeli occupation and U.S. sanctions with money from Qatar, Saudi Arabia and israel. Democratic Victory: In 2006, Hamas won Palestinian legislative elections fair and square. Israel and the U.S. responded by cutting off aid and imposing a blockade. Governance: After violent clashes with Fatah, Hamas took control of Gaza and maintained order despite Israeli attacks and economic strangulation. Context: Hamas's "appeal" isn’t about “terrorism”—it’s about resistance to occupation, settlement expansion, and failed negotiations. Israel and the U.S. arm and train jihadist groups and ISIS in Syria and call them rebels while they attack Syrian women and children but then call Hamas "terrorists" for resisting the terrorism of the israeli occupation. Hamas has protected Palestinian civilians while israel bombs them. The exact opposite of israel's claims such as those made by Mike Huckabee last week.📽️in🧵 On September 12, 2001, Hamas representative Abdel Aziz Rantisi said that "the US reaps what it sows". He further stated that while Hamas could not approve of killing innocents, the United States was responsible for its own misery due to its support for israel and its actions against Arabs and Muslims. An understandable position considering the millions of Arabs and Muslims killed by the US and Israel in their never ending war campaign and occupation; and a testament to their overall restraint and nature. Further Context: Mia Shem stated that Hamas treated her well and only raped her with their eyes. When she returned to isreal she was drugged and raped by her gym instructor. 📺🧵 A fairly common practice in israel, which has one of the highest pedophile and rapist populations per capita in the world. Israel was caught brutally raping Palestinian prisoners on camera with police clubs. When they were punished (for getting caught) there was a riot to release them because "they have a right to rape". See: July 2024 Sde Teiman Incident International Designations: The U.S., EU, and israel label Hamas “terrorist” because it fights back against occupation. But Hamas has also negotiated ceasefires and shown restraint. They've agreed many times to a release of the hostages and Netanyahu intentionally ignores the offers, instead spreading propaganda claiming he's asking for peace and to "release the hostages". Meanwhile, israel kills tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians with impunity. Speculative Assertions: Elements within israel allowed or manipulated the 10/7 attacks to justify another war against Palestinians. An assertion made by Charlie Kirk before his assassination. The body of evidence that implicates israeli involvement, or at the very least that they knew ahead of time and allowed it to happen, continues to accumulate as insiders step forward and give their testimonies. Considering israel's history of creating and arming terrorist groups, how do we know that it was Hamas and not an israeli created cell that attacked on 10/7? As Netanyahu said "Democracies don't go to war easily. Sometimes you have to bomb them into going to war". There were large protests in israel leading up to 10/7 attack; protesting Netanyahu's judicial overhaul plan. Some 200k or more israelis showed up to protest Netanyahu. Conveniently for him, israel was attacked. Big Picture: By cultivating Hamas as a counterweight, israel created a force it later struggled to control. Hamas’s resistance is a response to occupation and systematic oppression—not a product of random violence. Conclusion: Historical records show israel cultivated the conditions for Hama's rise. The ongoing occupation, blockade, and attacks on civilians are the real aggressions. The evidence is undeniable. 📺Sep 22, 2025

Video Transcript AI Summary
"The UK led the way on Sunday recognizing a Palestinian state followed by Canada, Australia, and Portugal. In the face of the growing horror in the Middle East, we are acting to keep alive the possibility of peace and a two stage solution. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu says there will not be a Palestinian state in the West Bank. I have a clear message to those leaders who recognize the Palestinian state after the terrible massacre of October 7. You are giving a huge price to terrorism, and it will not happen. There will be no Palestinian state West of the Jordan."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The UK led the way on Sunday recognizing a Palestinian state followed by Canada, Australia, and Portugal. Speaker 1: In the face of the growing horror in the Middle East, we are acting to keep alive the possibility of peace and a two stage solution. That means a safe and secure Israel alongside a viable Palestinian state. Speaker 0: Unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state and the situation in Gaza are expected to dominate this week's UN general assembly. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu says there will not be a Palestinian state in the West Bank. Speaker 2: At the UN, I will present the truth. This is Israel's truth, but it is the objective truth in our righteous struggle against the forces of evil and our vision for real peace, peace from strength. Speaker 0: Netanyahu said the recognition delivers one message. Speaker 3: I Speaker 2: have a clear message to those leaders who recognize the Palestinian state after the terrible massacre of October 7. You are giving a huge price to terrorism, and I have another message for you. It will not happen. There will be no Palestinian state West of the Jordan. Speaker 0: Despite the argument that the decision would sideline Hamas and bring peace, Hamas took credit for the recognition, saying it's because of their October 7 invasion and massacre of Israelis. Palestinians in Ramallah welcomed the decision and made their ultimate goal clear. We also hope to see a complete Palestinian state from the sea to the river. Israeli legal expert Eugene Kantorovich says supporters can say what they want, but a Palestinian state doesn't exist. Speaker 3: They have complete independence, autonomy. Israel is not controlling their lives. So, what would a state give them that they don't have now? The ability to buy weapons on the international market and the ability to open their borders and bring in jihadis from around the world. So, imagine October 7, except this time, instead of machine guns and gliders, they have airplanes and artillery and millions of people who have come to join them on jihad from around the world. Speaker 0: Therefore, he says, Israel cannot allow the establishment of a Palestinian state. In Israel, there is talk of extending Israeli sovereignty over biblical Judea and Samaria, also known as the West Bank, thereby preventing the establishment of a Palestinian state. Netanyahu says he'll deliver Israel's official response after he meets with president Trump following his UN speech. Julie Stall, CBN News, Jerusalem.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@clevernameer 😂

VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 18, 2025 at 10:26 AM
Saved - September 23, 2025 at 7:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
There’s no evidence linking Israel to Charlie Kirk's death, and suggesting otherwise seems irrational. His platform appears to be hijacked, with accounts still active across various platforms. Questions arise about the investigation, such as the absence of video footage and the bullet's whereabouts. There’s ongoing discussion about the assassination, with many expressing agreement on the need for clarity. The overall tone reflects skepticism and a desire for transparency regarding the circumstances surrounding the incident.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

There is zero evidence that israel had anything to do with Charlie Kirks death. This is definitive proof that it's impossible👇🏻 You're crazy if you think there's a conspiracy... Literally psycho. Seek help. You have mental problems. https://t.co/UPPDz2OTVz

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion references a 33-hour timeline and mentions Luigi Magione, the Sonor brothers in the Boston bombing, the Centennial bomber Eric Rudolph, and Ted Kaczynski. "Thirty three hours, two hours after the video footage was enhanced and released, the suspect's father turned him in, and you got criticized for doing that, and I'm having a hard time understanding what people's expectations are." "I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, has been shot." "Well, somebody has fabricated a monstrous big lie thatIsrael had something to do with Charlie Kirk's horrific murder." "This is the courtyard where it all happened. It's now open to the public again." "And I just found out I'm retarded. It's true."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mhmm. Because it it thirty three hours and I did mention Luigi Magione, and I did mention the Sonor brothers in the Boston bombing. And I did talk about the Centennial bomber, Eric Rudolph, and and Ted Kaczynski. Thirty three hours, two hours after the video footage was enhanced and released, the suspect's father turned him in, and you got criticized for doing that, and I'm having a hard time understanding what people's expectations are. Speaker 1: Sean, my expectation is delivered to the mission and the resources of the men and women of the FBI need and to produce, and that's what we did here. When you're talking about things like going out to a crime scene, that's how you investigate that matter properly. And when you're talking about on Speaker 2: this area? Should we cordon off this side? Safety team is here. I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, Speaker 3: has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what Speaker 2: the what the security detail just said. Speaker 4: Well, somebody has fabricated a monstrous big lie that Israel had something to do with Charlie Kirk's horrific murder. This is insane. It is false. It is outrageous. Speaker 5: This is the courtyard where it all happened. It's now open to the public again. There's lots of people coming here, flaking flowers, cards, things like that. The university is already making some changes. They're replacing the grass where Charlie Kirk was speaking with pavers. Speaker 0: And I just found out I'm retarded. It's true.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/apzUpZXQes

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirks entire platform has been stolen. All of his accounts are still posting content. YouTube, Rumble, X... Wild shit..

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/qZ8sjdCdPa

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Nothing like some DQ after a high profile hit. This kid is a natural. https://t.co/K2P7S1o4aB

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/oKnl5cni0Y

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Simple Questions You Should Be Asking Kirk Shooter Why did they not release this video of the Tyler Robinson in the stairwell? Why are they not releasing the footage of how Tyler Robinson got on the roof? They found the casing, where's the bullet? There were at least 33 hours after his death before they caught him so did they match the bullet to the gun? Did they even find a bullet? How do they know it's not all decoys?

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/cOFlQXJtfi

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk Assassination Master Thread The Evidence (DEEP THREAD🧵ONGOING)

Video Transcript AI Summary
If Bibi Netanyahu, if he does something I don't like and if I criticize it, am I, like, a bad Christian? Absolutely not. What I find strange is that we're able to criticize the American government sometimes in the Christian world with more freedom than the Israeli government. To be pro Israel means you believe in the nation of Israel Mhmm. Not necessarily the government of Israel. When you when Joe Biden was president, you and I were what we loved America, but we detested our government. And those two those two things beautifully coexisted. And what they don't want is they don't wanna be called bad Christians Mhmm. If they challenge a foreign government, which is what happens so often. Right. Like you're a bad Christian if you have a question about a foreign government. Right. That creates backlash that I don't think people understand.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Bibi Netanyahu, if he does something I don't like and if I criticize it, am I, like, a bad Christian? Absolutely not. What I find strange is that we're able to criticize the American government sometimes in the Christian world with more freedom than the Israeli government. To be pro Israel means you believe in the nation of Israel Mhmm. Not necessarily the government of Israel. When you when Joe Biden was president, you and I were what we loved America, but we detested our government. And those two those two things beautifully coexisted. Yeah. You never you never once said, hey, I'm I'm out on America. On America's right. Exactly. And what they don't want is they don't wanna be called bad Christians Mhmm. If they challenge a foreign government, which is what happens so often. Right. Like you're a bad Christian if you have a question about a foreign government. Right. That creates backlash that I don't think people understand.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@CredibleUFO 💯

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@RetiredArmyEOD Yep

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@naturallyCDG Seems like it..

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@Duke0fCarolina 💯

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@SInvasion2020 Yep

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@MACHIVELIUS ⚡️⚡️

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@mrs_mwp 😂

VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 14, 2025 at 3:53 AM
Saved - September 21, 2025 at 9:38 AM

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

The Charlie Kirk Show November 16, 2023 | FULL Please Spread/Download/Post

Video Transcript AI Summary
Key topics include Gavin Newsom’s Beijing date with Xi and Joe Biden’s Air Force One arrival, framed around a San Francisco cleanup and a rumored ‘romantic’ dynamic. The host lauds Twitter’s ‘liberation’ under Elon Musk but notes Musk’s anti-Semitism controversy over a reply to an ad; Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens weigh in on Jewish donors funding liberal causes and the ADL’s role. AIPAC announces $100,000,000 to defeat the Squad. Seamus Brunner discusses Controllogarchs, detailing Bill Gates, OpenAI, Davos, CBDCs, microchips, and patents; Soros and Alexander Soros; abortion-drug profits and Rockefeller links; AI surveillance and digital IDs as threats. Heather McDonald talks about anti-white hostility and crime statistics. Candace Owens addresses the Ben Shapiro dispute. The program covers Douglas Mackey’s prison sentence appeal, the FCC digital-discrimination order, and concerns about Rana McDaniel’s RNC leadership amid Virginia’s elections.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Charlie Kirk show begins in one minute. The Charlie Kirk show begins in thirty seconds. The Charlie Kirk show begins in ten seconds. Speaker 1: The Charlie Kirk show starts now. Speaker 0: But today was supposed to be Gavin Newsom's day. After a romantic first date in Beijing where Gia showed Gavin his exquisite birds, intertwined trees, custom toboggans, Gavin thought he was a shoo in for a second date. She was flying into Gavin's hometown, San Francisco. And when Gavin found out, he grabbed the broom and cleaned up. Sorry, vagrants. I have a date. He waited for Chi at the airport, marveled at him as he descended onto the tarmac. And the way Gavin looked at Chi was kinda like how Taylor Swift looks at Travis Kelce. Gavin was ready to take the relationship to the next level until he found out there was someone else, Joe Biden. The president flew in on Air Force One. Now Newsom had competition. When Chi saw Joe, they couldn't keep their hands off each other. As Joe likes to brag, he spent more time with Chi than anyone else. Not to mention the fact that Chi's guys bribed the Biden family. The chemistry was unmistakable. Speaker 2: I've never doubted what you've told me in terms of your candid nature in which you speak. Speaker 3: I still remember our interactions very vividly, and it always gives me a lot of thoughts. Speaker 4: Whatever stage of development it may reach, China will never pursue hegemony or expansion and will never impose its will on others. China does not seek spheres of influence and will not fight a cold war or a hot war with anyone. China will remain committed to dialogue and impose confrontation and build partnerships instead of alliances. It will continue to pursue a mutually beneficial strategy of opening up. The modernization we are pursuing is not for China alone. We are ready to work with all countries to advance global modernization featuring peaceful development, mutually beneficial cooperation, and common prosperity, and to build a community with a shared future for mankind. Speaker 5: Let's talk about our dependence on China. Today, we're actually talking about Xi Jinping, picking on Donald Trump's word vermin to talk about that status quo. You know what's vermin? What's running around San Francisco on a given day before Gavin Newsom cleaned it up on a dime to roll out the red carpet for Xi Jinping. If he could do that for Xi Jinping, he could have done it on ordinary day, and yet we're here sitting talking not about the substance of that, but on one word that Donald Trump said in some speech in Miami. This is what's wrong with the mainstream media. Focus on the substance, and let's have an actual policy debate rather than talking to a presidential candidate instead of the policy substance of what's actually going on in the country, picking on some word that Donald Trump said on a certain day and asking me for comment on it. Speaker 6: You see, we're in a very important Speaker 1: time in our nation's history. You look around in this room. Don't give me this nonsense that Americans are giving up. That is not true. Okay, get your tickets. Amfest.com. Amfst.com. Amfest.com. Huge speakers to be announced tomorrow. Mass of speakers. Can't wait to share that all with you. Excellent event last evening in Reno, Nevada. Really great people. We packed it out 1,300 patriots. Telling you the remnant is strengthening. It really is amazing to see. So God bless all of you that attended our event last evening. Lots to cover today. We got Candace Owen joining the show. We got so much stuff happening. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. We're about to get started. Speaker 7: The Charlie Kirk show. Every day is a battle for your mind raging. Information coming from every angle with the will to deceive. Fear not. You found the place for truth. The voice of a generation that still has the will to believe in the greatest country in the history of the world. This is the Charlie Kirk show. Buckle up. Here we go. Speaker 1: Hello, everybody. Radio stations across the country. Honored to be with you. You can email us as always freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Excellent event last evening in Reno, Nevada. It's great to see so many of you. I cannot emphasize enough the win for liberty, the win for humanity that the liberation of Twitter has meant for all of us. It's remarkable. Liberating Twitter from what it once was to what it is now is a win for the narrative. It's a win for truth. It's a win as we try to fight back against this uniparty regime, the tyrants, and the authoritarian dictators that are running the country. Elon Musk, even if they shut down Twitter today, will go down as a major hero for allowing us to be able to speak, to question narratives, to get the truth out. Elon Musk got himself in a little Speaker 8: bit of Speaker 1: trouble yesterday. Elon Musk responded to a tweet that I actually don't think the tweet is that smart. I think one part of it is legit, but I think another part of it is not so great. But the essence of what Elon was responding to is a major thought crime in America that the world's wealthiest man would comment on this is historic. So here's the tweet and it's responding to a video and the video was basically a white father with his white son saying to his son, Hey, you think that, you know, you're posting online all this anti Semitic stuff, why don't you go and say this to these Jewish families face? Pretty powerful advertisement. This is the ad, okay? It's about a minute long, it's a powerful ad, and then a person on Twitter responded to this advertisement, and then Elon responded to the person responding to the advertisement. It's important. Bear with us. Because right now, Elon Musk is being targeted like never before. Elon Musk was supposed to speak at a summit today, and he's been canceled. They don't want to hear from Elon Musk because they are tarring and feathering him as an anti Semite. They've come after this program for calling us anti Semites. They're coming after Elon Musk for calling, they're calling him an anti Semite. So here's the advertisement. It's a powerful ad. Play Cut 79. Speaker 2: I saw what you've been posting. Hitler was right. I didn't teach you that. You hide behind your screen, spewing all this hatred and ugliness. You got something you wanna say? Get out of the truck and say it to their faces. Speaker 1: Okay. So that that advertisement then was responded to by this person, the artist formerly known as Eric. Quote, okay. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. I am deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest swear word, Let's just say tiniest crap now about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. You want truth said to your face? There it is. Now, let me just say, this is not is not a very well written tweet. I said it's very confusing. I'll go through what they're basically saying here. Half of this tweet is true, half of it I don't like. You want the truth said to your face? There it is. Elon responds and he says you have said the actual truth. Now we don't know what part Elon is saying is the actual truth, so let's go through this. Again, it's double negatives and misuse of the word disinterested. It's a strange tweet that Elon pinpointed on here. But the first part is absolutely true. Let's go to this. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. Now, I don't like generalizations. Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true the Anti Defamation League was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left wing anti white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke and it wasn't just ADL, it was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges. Right? Mark Rowan, Leon Kaufman. Can we get that full list? It's very powerful. The part of the so that's totally true. And by the way, Tucker Carlson reinforces this. So I'm gonna kinda it was quite a day on the Internet. Tucker Carlson was inter interviewing Candace Owens. We have Candace Owens coming up next hour. And Tucker Carlson mentions that Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. We said this, by the way, last week, and people came after us. We came we actually said it in a different way. We said, I'm glad that Jewish Americans are reconsidering their financing of cultural Marxism. And people misunderstood it intentionally and slandered us as being anti Semites. But listen to this, Tucker Carlson is completely correct by saying this, that the philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country. Play Cut 92. Speaker 9: However, then I thought, well, wait a second. If the biggest donors at, say, Harvard have decided, well, we're gonna shut it down now. Where were you the last ten years when they Speaker 10: were going Speaker 9: for WeisGenocide? You were allowing this, and then I found myself really hating those people actually. That you're okay with that? On what grounds were you okay with that? Speaker 10: And I this is what I've been trying to explain to the pro Israel lobby that what you are seeing is lack of support, is people that are asking the question is where were you? Yeah. As we have endured all of this. You were paying Speaker 11: for it actually. Speaker 10: Right. You were Speaker 9: paying for it. Speaker 10: You were you were paying for it. Speaker 9: Because you were calling my children immoral for their skin color. You paid for that. And I don't So why shouldn't I be mad at you? I don't understand. Speaker 1: So what Tucker is saying is similar to part of the tweet that Elon isolated that is true. That let's just say liberals, but that includes Jewish financiers of liberal causes didn't really care about University of Chicago having courses that saying, you know, the problem with whiteness. They didn't really care about American Express saying that we must eliminate whiteness. They didn't, in fact, they were supportive of it. A lot of liberals were okay with critical race theory, diversity, equity, inclusion. ADL went all in on the BLM type narrative and ADL is one of many different organizations that were perfectly fine with the growing anti white wave. Now to be clear, many of these Jews did not fully understand what they were financing. Their intentions were probably pretty good. As we've said, intentions mean next to nothing here. And I'm sure some of the intentions weren't so good, but let's just attention to the side. I'm not that interested in intentions. I'm interested in actions. Okay? Intentions are very hard to pinpoint. We get too caught up in the conservative movement on intentions. I learned this from the great Dennis Prager, who says stop focusing on intentions, focus on the actions. It's a much better way to judge whether or not something is right or wrong. Intentions, as I've said before, and there's a video that went viral, the Nazis thought they were doing good. They convinced themselves that they were doing good, when in reality, they were doing some of the greatest evil in the history of the species. Again, So Hamas thinks they're doing good. I could go through all this, but they're doing evil. So I'm not convinced that somebody's intentions are what matter. Many Jewish financiers culturally given money to George Washington University, Columbia, Yale, Dartmouth over and over and over again. Hundreds of millions of dollars, billions of dollars financing many nonprofits that many of them are now recognizing and realizing this was a bad idea. So I'm going to build this out because the second part of the tweet I don't like, and it ties into some news that is not so good for AOC. It's not good for Ayanna Pressley. I'm going to isolate that in just a second. But let me just say before I talk about my Patriot supply, it is sloppy. It is shallow. It is wrong and repulsive to call a great man, Elon Musk, an anti Semite. It cheapens the label of anti Semitism. It is not good for anybody. Okay, My Patriot Supply. I want to tell you guys about My Patriot Supply. It is an amazing service that you guys can have. In fact, they will bring your emergency preparedness food to you. Go to mypatriotsupply.com. That is mypatriotsupply.com. You are nine meals away from anarchy. Go to mypatriotsupply.com, to make sure that you have the emergency preparedness food for what might be coming next. I know it feels like things are falling apart. Make sure you are prepared for your family right now. Mypatriotsupply.com. That is mypatriotsupply.com. Email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com. Yesterday was one of the livelier days in the history of the Internet. We're just getting started. Stay right there. Noble Gold Investments is pleased to let you know that gold was the best investment class for 02/2022. Through all our record breaking inflation, crashing stock market, the crypto scams, there is one asset that has held its own, gold. According to longtermtrends.net, gold has actually outperformed the S and P 500, Dow, and Bitcoin for 02/2022. Had you invested in the S and P five hundred a year ago, you would be down more than 20%. If you invested in Bitcoin a year ago, you'd be down more than 65%. If you invested in the Dow a year ago, you'd be down almost 10%. Yes. Gold has outperformed them all in 02/2022, and silver is not far behind. Yes. While the world was busy hailing other assets as the real hedge, gold and silver are the only assets that would have protected your wealth. So join the thousands of others by opening a gold IRA or silver IRA with Noble Gold Investments. Get in right now, and you'll bag a free one fourth of an ounce American Gold Eagle coin with every qualified IRA of $50,000 or more. You can't go wrong with Noble Gold Investments and their thousands of five star reviews. Call Noble Gold at (877) 646-5347 to add real gold to your IRA. That's (877) 646-5347. We frequently get asked the question, who's in charge? Who is calling the shots? So it's clear it's not Joe Biden. There's somebody else that is in charge. Well, our next guest is Seamus Brunner, who has a new book out that is very interesting. Exposing the Billionaire Class, Their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life. Sounds uplifting. Seamus, welcome to the program. Speaker 12: Hey, Charlie. It's great to be with you. Speaker 1: Tell us about your book. Speaker 12: Yeah. So I hear it all the time that the pandemic is over. The pandemic is in the path. That's not true. The pandemic was a blueprint for the future and you see it all the time. Our world is getting smaller. It's getting more and more controlled. We're losing control over our children's education, over everything from our food sources to our finances. And so this really lays out the people who are pushing this agenda. Speaker 1: Well, walk us through some of the specifics and the details that that are in the book, and, you know, we can go from there. Speaker 12: Sure. So we follow the money. We follow it all the way to the top at the Government Accountability Institute. We followed it to Davos. I know you've done some great work on this stuff. Let's see. Like, Bill Gates and the the food scheme he's got going. Everybody knows that Bill Gates is buying up all this farmland in The US. They know he's investing in creepy fake food companies, but they're you know, they're not really sure why. And so a lot of it is about money. We we follow the patents. Bill Gates, I mean, as a software salesman, he knows all about licensing and all about intellectual property. His father was an intellectual property attorney. He really helped Microsoft get off the ground. Well, he has used that intellectual property knowledge to start cornering the markets in industries like food. So for example, he buys into Beyond Meats and Impossible Foods only after they have received their patents. And that's kind of the whole thing with these fake foods. It's they say it's about climate change and solve you know, solving climate change, saving the planet. What it's really about is patenting our food sources. They patented the seeds. They've patented the fertilizers, and now they're patenting the meats. Speaker 1: Yeah. So, I mean, the more sinister explanation is that Bill Gates might wanna have less less people. What what what is the or what is the reason you would say that Bill Gates wants to control our food supply? Speaker 12: Well, that's absolutely true, and it sounds like a conspiracy theory. I thought it was too. And you see these clips every now and then of Bill Gates saying there needs to be less people. But that's what all of the characters in this book actually believe. They think that the Earth is vastly overpopulated, and population needs to go down. They don't ever really give you specifics on how they plan to bring the population down. Okay, Speaker 1: everybody. Welcome back. I mean the essence is this: Why do Jews continue to support institutions that hate them? Let's just make it as plain as possible, right? The the part of the tweet though that I want to isolate that I don't like is the kind of bitterness here. Quote, this person said that Elon responded to, I'm deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest crap now about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. This is where I disagree. I support own awakening. I think it's awesome that anybody wakes up regardless of if they did something prior in the past. I don't like that kind of bitterness and that kind of cynicism, to be honest. This person says I'm deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest crap about Western Jewish populations. I see it completely different. I think I think it's exciting and hopeful that Jewish Americans are starting to divest dollars from university campuses. I think that it's exciting when any population starts to reconsider their prior views. So kind of break out of the bitterness. Yes, of course, it's true that traditionally Jews have been funding in America institutions that hate them. And that's too bad. That's tragic. But there's the fact that they're discontinuing that, that they're speaking out against it, that gives me hope. So actually, I do have concern for that. So I I don't know if Elon was responding to that part of it. I think it was probably the first part. If I had to summarize again, I don't know. I can't read Elon's mind. He's gonna have to defend himself. He has sent out subsequent tweets mainly focused on the ADL saying why does the ADL turn a blind eye to anti white, anti Asian hatred while we import the third world that hates Jews and hates everybody? So he's clarified that. So to his credit, it's pretty clear. But this is very important. And we're starting to see some legitimate hope and movement in this direction, which I think is it was very exciting, which is that this announcement yesterday, AIPAC, the American Israeli Political Action Committee, has announced that they are going to spend $100,000,000 to defeat the squad. They're gonna spend a $100,000,000 to in Democrat primaries to go after AOC, Ilan Omar, Jamal Bowman, Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, and there's two other black women. I don't know who they are. I think it might be Fox is the other one. I I I don't know. The squad has grown. Okay. They've multiplied in number. And AIPAC, the American Israeli political action committee is saying, we wanna get rid of the members of the squad. Now, of course, that's not the best use of their money. Their best use of their money is support Donald Trump, is an amazing friend of Israel, who fought against all this poison, but this is a better use of money than the traditional investments that we've seen from sending money to Harvard, sending money to Yale, sending money to the ADL, sending money to BLM. This is way better than APAC spending $100,000,000 to try to defeat Marjorie Taylor Greene or Lauren Boebert. This is now $100,000,000 that they're spending where AOC is gonna have to defend her turf. Elon Omar is gonna have to defend her turf. So to respond to this now viral tweet that Elon responded to, this person says I'm disinterested in giving the tiniest crap about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization. Wrong. We wanna win, and you should not say, hey, you're not welcome into the club because you made mistakes prior. I don't wanna be part of that political movement. I think that is callous, that is elitist, that smug. People should always be welcome to admit errors. Always. I think that's a bad attitude across the board. I held some really stupid political positions five years ago. Some people say, you're still not allowed in the club, Charlie, because you said something stupid five years ago. So there's no growth allowed. There's no forgiveness. There's no humility. Honestly, that's an anti Western value. It's an anti Christian value to say that what you said five years ago will always be hung around your neck and you'll never be allowed to grow, to develop, to clarify, to educate yourself. And I think it's actually exciting and showing that AIPAC, which does tilt Democrat, just so we're clear, most of the membership of AIPAC are Democrats. They are investing their resources to try and make it harder for Marxists to win. Is that the best use of their money? No. It is a far better use of money than what we have seen the last twenty or thirty years. It is a positive move in the right direction. So anyway, that's Elon Musk's response. Elon will have to defend himself. Elon is not an anti Semite. What Elon was probably isolating here, as he has clarified in subsequent tweets, is that hey, Jewish populations have been financing a lot of this stuff. It's good that they are waking up. I think it's positive. I think it's exciting, and it gives me hope. More after the break. Email is freedom@CharlieKirk.com. Speaker 13: Do you Speaker 1: know that the average American spends about twenty years in retirement? That's a long time to live without a steady income. And we wanna make sure you enjoy every moment of it and don't outlive your money. Retirement is about more than just investments. It's about living your best life. Let's not retire. Let's pivot. My friends at Pax Financial, who I use for my wealth management future, develop a course for the sole purpose of helping you pivot. If you want your own free guide to pivoting into the new chapter of life with purpose, visit packsfg.com/charlie. I don't think they're investing their money into the new modern day equivalents of hospitals or public parks. Rockefeller, for example, donated millions of acres in Maine and Wyoming, which we now know as the gateway to Yellowstone Park. They literally named the entire highway after it. You know, Carnegie built, you know, not just Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon, but also huge amounts of public infrastructure projects. Talk about how this is a different elite. This is a different mindset. This is a separate psychology than we've seen of the elites a century ago. Speaker 12: That's exactly right, Charlie. The the, you know, the oligarchs so called oligarchs of the early twentieth century are nothing like what we're seeing today. What we see today with the big tech oligarchs is, like, it's got complexes on steroids. They want to control every aspect of your life from what you're eating to what you're seeing. I mean, information, of course, you you know, you talk about it all the time with the censorship and the clampdowns on descent. And as far as loving America, no. These are these are avowed globalists. They're loyal to the World Economic Forum, and Davos just they, you know, they call themselves citizens of the world. That's, know, the abolition of borders and Soros funding all of these migrant groups moving people into The US. He wants to do away with borders. And so, yeah, there's there's a you know, I they don't state that they're not loyal to The United States, but their actions and especially their funding show that they have other loyalties. Speaker 1: Yeah. The this kind of, other loyalties is important, and the god complex is bad. What's even worse than the god complex is wanting to use your kind of wealth and your power to remake the country, not to shore up its defenses. I mean, Henry Ford certainly had some issues. Right? But he poured into the country. He wanted a very strong country. And so where does this come from? Why is it that the new roster of the elites that you detail in your book, Controllogarchs, why do they hate the homeland so much? Where does this come from? Is it because they went to university? I mean, Bill Gates was a dropout. Is it because they were raised in a Silicon Valley finance culture that is more globalist minded? Where does it come from? Speaker 12: Well, let's see. Yes. That's exactly right. I mean, it's the globalist mindset. It's and it's not so it's not necessarily just America. It's more the peasant class. I mean, they have more in common with the elites of China, for example. I go, you know, into great detail about how they really love China, and they love the Chinese system. They love this amalgamation of capitalism and communism. State run capitalism is what they call it in China. Claus Schwab calls it stakeholder capitalism, which I know you've talked about, and it's sort of this esoteric term. But stakeholder capitalism, when you read Claus Schwab's manifestos, the people who don't aren't the stakeholders. He never talks about the people. We the people being stakeholders. It's always business leaders and NGOs and officials from, you know, the government. We don't have a seat at that table. Speaker 1: Yeah. So to kinda build that out further, though, which is there's the World Economic Forum. You have Klaus Schwab on the front page of your book. Everyone is driven by something different. I I I don't know if you agree with this. Do you think that Soros has a different agenda than Zuckerberg? I do. Zuckerberg seems like a guy who wants to end the game with the most tokens. Soros is a guy that wants to destroy the game. Would you agree with that? Speaker 12: Yeah. But they they I do I do agree with that. I mean, they're all they're all have different motivations to a degree, but they also have a lot of the same motivations in that they want to control, you know, every facet of life. I, you know, see it time and again both with Soros and with Zuckerberg. So, yes, they're they have different opinions. They're different people. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I I just I I think that Soros is far more sinister and kinda say Machiavellian. Zuckerberg, I think, is malleable. I mean, based on all public accounts, people that have known Zuckerberg, he's used to be kind of this free speech liberal, almost libertarian, but I think he's a coward. I think that external forces have been able to shape shift Zuckerberg. I think he wants to be liked. I think he wants to have his empire. He wants to be reasonable. Soros is a legit ideologue. We we have no evidence that Zuckerberg in his private musings is all about, you know, western transformation. Right? Now he might be doing that, but as far as his intention, I'm not so sure. Speaker 7: Charlie Kirk Speaker 1: Okay, everybody. Hillsdale College. I'm wearing my Hillsdale tie today. With America's college and universities so morally corrupt, they're less concerned with critical thinking than with indoctrination. I'm happy to report there is a college where students debate ideas openly and honestly. It's my favorite college, Hillsdale College. You can learn more at charlieforhillsdale.com. As stated in Hillsdale's founding document in 1844, Hillsdale's original mission was to offer the serious kind of liberal arts education needed to preserve the blessings of civil and religious liberty across the land. Look, if you go to charlieforhillsdale.com, you'll find a short video. It's over a minute long showing how Hillsdale's work, not only on its Michigan and Washington DC campuses, but across the nation is effective in defending American liberty. Their online courses are excellent. You've got to check it out right now. Go to charlie4hillsdale.com. That is charlief0rhillsdale.com. As stated in the Hillsdale online documents, you've got to check it out. Charlie for hillsdale dot com. You could take the Victor Davis Hanson American citizenship class, the American history class, of course, on Aristotle, Winston Churchill, mathematics, Euclidean geometry, Genesis, Exodus. Do you want to learn? Charlieforhillsdale.com is the place to start. They do a wonderful job, and they are America's greatest college by far. So check it out. Charlieforhillsdale.com. Okay. So some of you might say, but Charlie, is there really a war on white people? Yeah. Let's put aside all of the obvious anti white violence we've seen in high schools, the white kid getting killed. You know, let's put all that aside, which which is clear. Let's put aside the University of Chicago course, the course at Yale, all that stuff. This is an amazing example of what we're talking about. Now, to be very accurate, you can't say that, you know, liberal Jews are funding this. Okay? What we're getting at, though, is that this example is one of hundreds of thousands that should really make you think deeply about what is happening in American education. It is fashionable. It is popular. It is in vogue to hate white people. I'm going to prove it to you. There's a new series of videos over the last couple of weeks that I've seen of students that record on Zoom high school debate competitions. Now, to be clear, high school debate is not what it used to be. It doesn't teach rhetoric. It doesn't teach persuasion. It doesn't teach public speaking. It doesn't encourage an authentic understanding of a topic. High school debate has become spewing of left wing talking points and they become winners. Now, recent weeks, high school students in debate again have been recording these debates on Zoom and have been putting them on the Internet to say, hey, look what passes as debate now. Look what passes as a popular argument or a what's considered to be a winning argument. So, oh, is this a guy that does this incubate debate James Fishback? I I guess he's the one that's tweeting this stuff out. It's very interesting. I I I wasn't aware of that. So I want you to listen very carefully. This here is a high school debate team that won the debate. I want you to count how many times they say the word white. This is what is considered to be a good argument. They ignored the prompt and resorted to shamelessly attacking white people, not once, not twice, but with zero depth whatsoever, blaming white people for all the problems. Listen carefully. This is what is considered to be a winning debate team in America today. Play cut one thirteen and listen carefully. Speaker 14: We demand that white Christians be held accountable for America's original sin. The negative continues the trend in politics while whiteness devours the other. Debating this topic is irrelevant while society is dominated by white Christians. Even if we have something educational to say about this topic, the political will just pray it away and continue their mission to conquer the world in the name of Jesus Christ. The military industrial complex has been coupled with American Christianity, the worship of the weapons of whiteness. United States was built to be a city upon a hill for white Christians. American Christianity has controlled all aspects of politics such as justifying slavery. We solved by decoupling weapons and worships and ending the crusade. White Christians literally inscribe scriptures onto their weapons, worshiping through war. We want to repent for our sins and show America's failure. By voting for us, the judge will send his signal to political leaders and condemn Christian in politics. Speaker 15: That ends up being a two one for Livingston. The affirmative tells me in summary and final focus that the role of the ballot for me is to reject Christian militarism. So at the end of the day, I'm left with deciding which side I think is better doing a better job rejecting Christian militarism. Speaker 1: That is considered to be a winning debate. They ignored the prompt and they just said, yeah, it's all about Christian militant militarism and white Christianity. That's considered to be deep. And they won. They won the debate. Where does that come from exactly? It goes down the tributary. It starts at Harvard. It starts at Yale. It starts at Dartmouth. And then it goes down. They create the teaching standards. They create the curriculum. And what many Jews are texting me to their great credit, They're saying, oh my gosh. High school debate will soon say this. They'll soon read a prompt. And it's the Jews' fault. They're an inch away from saying that. This close. And what Candace was saying and what Tucker was saying and what Elon is saying is that that clip I just played until recently did not bother most liberal Jews. And that's frustrating. Now it does bother a lot of liberal Jewish donors. Dots are starting to be connected. They're like, Oh, wait. All the toxicity and venom and hatred that we turned a blind eye to or we might have been cool with against white people is now being directed to us. So in that high school debate clip, you saw these kids reading a prompt, right? Reading a prompt, and they say, you know, white people are to blame for this. It doesn't take a massive leap to turn that high school debate kid to plug and replace, to copy paste white people out, Jewish in. That's where this comes from, guys. We've said this for the last couple weeks. Why is it that so many young people are on board for the Palestinian liberation thing or Gaza? Why are so many young people praising Osama bin Laden right now? It's a big thing right now on TikTok. Huge. Osama bin Laden is being praised by Generation Z because you've taught them to hate America, to hate white people, and then eventually hate Jews. And Hamas sympathizers are literally BLM two point o. You guys remember this. Here's cut one fourteen. White people begging for forgiveness from black people. This is during Floyd a Palooza. Play cut one fourteen. Okay. That's some sick stuff. Speaker 8: By the Speaker 1: way, it's sick on two sides. It's sick for the white people doing it and sick for the black people that are allowing it to happen. Like, some black guys should be like, this is insane. Get up. Enough. We're gonna take responsibility for our own problems. Get off your knees. Stop asking are you a you should have been are you KKK? Are you racist? Then stop apologizing. Enough. Stop pandering to us. You got that black woman crying. Oh my gosh. I've been waiting for this my whole life. I can get a job. Give me a break. The white hate gets turned into white guilt in the heads of weak minded people who then fall for the rhetoric. So where what does all this tie together, everybody? You are living through without a doubt one of the most heated, consequential, high stakes realignments in the history of the digital narrative war. I know that some of you might not see it, you might not be looking at it. If you are not actively on social media, you might not be watching it. I'm telling you, you are living through a TikTok, Twitter, Instagram. I have never seen sea changes like this ever. And we are flirting with some really dangerous stuff. Very dangerous stuff. There's some exciting stuff happen of people waking up and enlightenments and awakening and the rising of the frequencies. Producer Andrew said this morning, I have never seen so many people wake up so quickly. That is true. Simultaneously, I have not seen so much garbage, venom, crap spread so quickly in the history of the digital narrative war. Remember, Twitter is the incubator of elite opinion, but TikTok is the incubator of idiocy for generation Z. Let me say that again. Twitter is the incubator for elite thought. TikTok is the incubator of idiocy for Generation Z. They might say, but Charlie, let's compete on TikTok. We try. We have our, you know, I resisted as long as I could. They censor us. They ban us. They suppress us. TikTok, which is a Chinese Communist Party asset funded by the Chinese Communist Party, they elevate content that weakens America, weakens Western society. They will give priority to trans content. They give priority to gay content. They give priority to left wing politics, and they deemphasize pages that would talk about masculinity, borders, free speech, or conservative values. Chinese TikTok is all about solving math problems and games and being healthy and having big families. American TikTok is about cutting off your genitals, taking Lupron, and supporting Hamas. So what I'm getting at here, the macro, because some of you might say, but Charlie, how do all these different dots connect? You are living through right now one of the greatest changes of how people view the world in my life by far in my lifetime. I've not seen anything like it. COVID was close, but the difference with COVID is that almost all the means of communication were suppressed. We couldn't speak openly on Twitter during COVID. We kept on losing access to our Twitter account. We now have Twitter, so the truth can get out. We're like, wow. Could you if we had axe this is a this is the truth. If we had access to Twitter and Elon owned Twitter during COVID, I think hundreds of thousands of lives would have been saved. We got suppressed on ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, monoclonal antibodies. Imagine how many lives could have been saved if we had Twitter during COVID. It's a big deal. At the same time, we for every action there's equal and opposite reaction, we have Twitter and then we have TikTok, which is just this Wuhan laboratory of anti West hatred that Gen Z is just getting. It's pumping in. By the way, I've been completely unsuccessful. I tell parents, why do you give yourself your kids phones? Honestly, because parents don't want a parent anymore. That's why. They give their kid a digital pacifier so they can go back to wine and their kid can just stare at the screen all day long. Like, I don't know why my kid is depressed. Yeah. Go look at your kid's screen time. Okay? Eight and a half hours staring at TikTok. Yeah. I mean, don't be surprised when their suicidal ideation goes up. It's just so weird. Why do some of these kids depressed and anxious? Because they're staring at their screen all day long. Go be a parent. Go stare at a tree. Go fish. Go for a run. There's a life outside of watching a bunch of trannies dancing in favor of Hamas. Relieffactor.com. A 100% drug free relief factor. Knee pain, back pain, joint pain, elbow pain. Check it out right now at relieffactor.com. The 100% drug free Relief Factor could be the best solution for you. Leah was sitting on her couch in so much pain. She was literally in tears. You've got to check it out. She says, I'm so I'm truly amazed at this product. If you're living with aches and pains, see how Relief Factor, a daily drug free supplement could help you feel better and live longer. You're gonna get started. Try this Relief Factor three week quick start. It's only $19.95 and comes with feel better, your money back guarantee. Visit relieffactor.com. That's relieffactor.com. $1,800 for relief. That's $1,800 for relief. They're amazing. So check it out right now. Relieffactor.com. So please check it out right now. Relieffactor.com. One Sunday, Leah was sitting on her couch. She was in pain and got out of pain. Relieffactor.com. $1,800 for relief. Feel better and money back guarantee only $19.95. That is relieffactor.com relieffactor.com. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. You are living through a digital realignment, a narrative war that is changing in real time. It's exciting and also scary simultaneously. We'll be right back. Because colleges and universities today are less concerned with critical thinking than with indoctrination. It is no wonder why so many young Americans embrace cancel culture, deny free speech to conservatives, and even celebrate terrorism. There is one college where students debate ideas openly and honestly, where they pursue truth together with their professors, and where America's great heritage of liberty is studied and revered. My favorite college, Hillsdale College. As stated in Hillsdale's founding document in 1844, Hillsdale's original mission was to offer the kind of serious liberal arts education needed to preserve the blessings of civil and religious liberty across the land, and this mission continues to guide Hillsdale College today. You can learn more at my favorite college's website, charlieforhillsdale.com. There, you will find a short video. It's just over a minute long showing how Hillsdale's work, not only on its Michigan campus, not only in Washington DC campus, but across the nation is effective in defending American liberty. Take some time to watch today at charlieforhillsdale.com. You are you're kind of super well built and trimmed. I think that's a good use of money. What's not a good use of money is his taxpayer funded electric vehicle ambitions. Tell us about it. Speaker 12: Yeah. That's right. And just going back to what you were saying a moment ago about Zuckerberg versus Doros, I think Bezos is a lot closer to Zuckerberg. Like you say, I mean, he had this sort of almost libertarian bent in the nineties, and it's sort turned into more I mean, he's very quiet. You don't hear much from him except when you see him doing these photoshoots. But it's yeah. But the with the electric vehicle, I mean, everyone knows about Amazon and Alexa. They're always listening to you. But what most people don't know is that they're actually trying to figure out what you're thinking. And and Amazon Web Services is, you know, a huge AI Speaker 7: Where tyranny dies and wisdom lives. The Charlie Kirk Show. Speaker 1: Somebody asked me the other day, how are you able to keep going on with this? Preserving liberty means more to me than anything else. Speaker 6: You see, we're in a very Speaker 1: important time in our nation's history. You look around in this room. Don't give me this nonsense that Americans are giving up. That is not true. Amfest.com. Amfest.com. Check it out. Phoenix, Arizona. It's gonna be the largest event we've ever held, god willing. Wait till you see the speakers we're announcing tomorrow. So get your tickets today while they're still there. Amfest.com. K. Welcome back. I I wanna just keep on encouraging APAC. I'm glad that they're deploying those resources in that way. It's not the best, but it's better, and that deserves encouragement and praise. God bless them. Candace Owens mentioned this, and we have Candace Owens coming up next hour. By the way, Candace was trending on Twitter all over the place, and people were so unfair to Candace Owens. I have her back a 100%. People say, oh, she's an anti Semite. I said, really? Candace Owens who dropped everything. I was in Jerusalem. It's a true story. I called Candace. I said, Candace, we have an extra ticket if you want it to go to the embassy opening when Trump moves the embassy. And she says, oh my goodness. She drops everything, eighteen hour flight, brutal connection through Europe, two red eye flights to get all the way to Israel for the embassy opening with Donald Trump. We saw where Jesus healed the sick. We went to the city of David. We saw the old city, and she loved it. So it's just these people, it's just so shallow, so sloppy. I don't like it at all. We'll talk more about that next hour. But Candace said this and she's and this is a vibe that is out there. And I don't think some of the pro Israel pro Israel advocates are listening when we say this. I'm gonna I'm gonna I'm in a separate category. I I have some bitterness that I've expressed on the show, which is the way that I've been talked about and treated has really bothers me, to be honest, because of how much prohazard advocacy I've done and do, but I'm a put put me aside. Okay? There is a Jonathan Greenblatt who runs the ADL. The ADL is an awful organization. He goes on television and he's saying this quote, Administrators are going to find their backbone if we hold them accountable. This is about the anti Jew hatred on campus. And by the way, he's correct in saying this to be perfectly fair. Donors need to hold them accountable. Students need to hold them accountable. Then he says the federal government needs to have them accountable. I don't really know what that means. Okay? But Jonathan Greenblatt, the reason why Candace said what she said on Tucker and the reason why the vibe on the right is off on this is we're like, really? Where were all of you guys the last couple of years? I thought hatred to one group is hatred to everybody. That's literally in the ADL ad. In the ADL ad is that all hate oh, I guess all hate is bad unless it's hatred of Asians and hatred of whites. Play cut 56. Speaker 16: The question I was gonna ask you, which we have now seen at least the beginning of some pushback finally from people who run these schools. You mentioned Columbia, other places. Do you see the leadership at some of these schools that you've been pushing so hard? Are they now finding the backbone you just described? Speaker 17: Well well, they're only gonna find the backbone if we hold them accountable. Donors need to hold them accountable. Students need to hold them accountable, and the federal government does too. And let me tell you, the university presidents, they might not listen to some students, but when they run the risk of losing hundreds of millions of dollars in federal grants, they're going to respond. Speaker 1: So there's a ADL is comprised of left wing, sometimes secular Jews. There's a major upheaval that's probably going to happen in the ADL sometime soon. Now why is it that the ADL receives such focus from Elon Musk and from us? It's not just that they're liberal. It's that the ADL goes out of their way to try and debank you. The ADL goes out of their way to try to pull advertisers from your show or from Twitter. The ADL, as he says accountability by the way, I think you should finally do that. By the way, if the ADL finally waves the sword towards colleges, I will be an enthusiastic supporter, but I don't buy it. If the ADL will be nearly as harsh to Harvard as they have been to Elon, God bless them. But they won't. They're gonna treat Harvard and Princeton and Yale with kid gloves, Cause the ADL are first liberals and then they're Jews. That's and you know who said that? Dennis Prager. So don't call me an anti Semite. Their liberalism is more important than their Judaism. It's always been that way. And they've been captured by a lot of secular Jews. So the question is, will the ADL be as ferocious, intense, nasty to Princeton, Yale, Dartmouth and Stanford as they have been to Twitter, to Jack Posobic, to Bannon? Probably not. You know, Greenblatt says, yeah, you know, we need some accountability. Really? Greenblatt, why don't you we know the answer because liberalism is very important to him, and Harvard is the holy cathedral of American left wing liberalism. Okay? Harvard is the Vatican of American leftism. It's just where they it's where the the catechism of the left is published in Harvard. So when he says accountability, why doesn't Harvard say, we're gonna defund you. We're gonna burn you to the ground because he doesn't he doesn't mean it. Okay. More coming up next hour. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Did you know that there is one phase of sleep that almost everyone fails to get enough of? And this one phase of sleep is responsible for most of your body's daily rejuvenation, repair, controlling hunger and weight loss hormones, boosting energy, and so much more. I'm talking about deep sleep. And if you don't get enough, you'll probably struggle with cravings, slow metabolism, premature aging, or even worse conditions. Why don't most people get enough of this one most important phase of sleep? A big reason is magnesium deficiency because over eighty percent of the population is deficient in magnesium. And magnesium increases GABA, which encourages relaxation on a cellular level, which is critical for sleep. Magnesium also plays a key role in regulating your body's stress response system. Those with magnesium deficiency usually have higher stress levels, which negatively impact sleep as well. Now before you go out, buy a magnesium supplement. It's important to understand that most products out there only have one or two forms of magnesium when the reality is your body needs all seven forms of this natural sleep mineral. That's why I Magnesium breakthrough contains all seven forms of magnesium designed to help calm your mind and you fall asleep, stay asleep, and wake up refreshed. The deep sleep benefits are really noticeable. Visit magnesiumbreakthrough.com/charlie and enter code Charlie 10 for 10% off any order. The special offer is only available at magnesiumbreakthrough.com/charlie. Speaker 12: Cloud contract type deal from the Pentagon. All of the big tech agencies are hosting their operations on Amazon Web Services. That's kind of a thing that goes really unnoticed. I mean, you see when you're watching an NFL game that Amazon's got the great stats, and I do enjoy seeing those stats that are you know, from AI that they're giving you. But think about all of that technology. They boast of it in the commercials being used against you. I mean, it's a pretty terrifying prospect. So I would say that Bezos amongst the people on the cover I mean, you're certainly right. George Soros is a total ideologue and and, you know, more terrifying in a lot of ways than what he's trying to fund with the chaos and the total destruction of The United States. You don't see Bezos totally funding that, but he's funding the climate change ambition, the so called climate change ambitions that are really all about control from the vehicles to the smart homes. I mean, there's some examples in the book of smart thermostats. If you got a smart thermostat, just imagine going home in the middle of the summer, going to bed and waking up drenched in sweat because the utility companies have decided they're gonna use your smart thermostat to keep the temperature high in the middle of the summer. It's happened in Texas. It happened in Colorado. You see Gavin Newsom in California telling people that their, you know, their temperatures of their homes need to stay up at 80 degrees when it's in a heat wave. I mean, it's just crazy. And Jeff Bezos is making the tech that allows you to do that. Speaker 1: The book is Controllogarcs. We will be right back after the break. Seamus Seamus, stay right there. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. We'll be right back. The book is Controllogarcs. Seamus Brunner continues with us. So, Seamus, let me ask you about this one, weaponizing artificial intelligence. Controllogarchs are rapidly ratcheting up AI to extinguish what remains of a free market and push Americans into Marxism. This is a very deep topic. I've always been I'm I'm worried currently that AI is going to be used as a tool to create a tyrannical society even worse than what we have. Your thoughts? Speaker 12: You're exactly right to be worried, and it's happening right now. The intelligence agencies, they're using AI. They're gonna use the tech companies to do it. You look at the biggest company, ChatGPT. I mean, regarding the of all you know, getting rid of the free market. Look at the largest company behind ChatGPT, OpenAI. There's a reason that OpenAI is funding universal basic income studies. And it's I mean, they you know, there's other experts, World Economic Forum experts who say that AI is going to eliminate 40% of the jobs. Either you're gonna have to adapt or you're gonna be out of work. And, you know, I think the ultimate goal here, they sort of state it when they say you will own nothing and be happy in Davos, is sort of a peasant class living in high rise buildings and ultra low emission zones with no cars eating the bugs, and that's what AI is going to allow. Speaker 1: In your research, how then do we best counter the the looming AI threat from these contrologarchs? Speaker 12: Well, the first step is you gotta be aware of this, and you gotta be aware of their blueprint. I mean, sunlight is the best disinfectant. Something that gives me hope in all of this is that keep more and more people are craving authenticity. As you see these AI thing, I mean, it's really cool that some of the videos you'll see online of what people are able to do with AI and making videos that look super real, but aren't. But then you see you can get down into the comment sections, and you see more and more people saying this is gross. This is creepy. It's the same thing with the fake foods. Something that gives me hope is, you know, they're not extremely popular, which is why they have to ban cows, and Ireland is headed towards slaughtering the cows. So as more more people become aware of what's going on, spread the word, shine the disinfecting light of sunlight on these agendas, that does give me hope. And, you know, nobody's gonna wanna live in a pod eating bugs. The question is once you're out of work and given a meager basic income of $30,000, are you going to be able to do anything about it? And that's why we need to act right now. Speaker 1: So your book Controllogarcs, set quote, rips back the curtain on never before published revelations. What are some of the craziest and most important revelations that our audience would not have heard before? Speaker 12: Well, I just published a piece on Breitbart today. It it might be the way he's lead story still, and this is about the the control guards profiting from abortion. I mean, right now, the supreme court is weighing whether or not to invalidate the FDA approval of a drug called mifepristone. It's also known as r u four eight six. And this is I mean, this thing is really a a sickening drug, and it shocked me when I found out that it's the most common method of abortion. Now you don't have to be pro life to find it sort of grotesque that people like George Soros and Warren Buffett are profiting and and setting up secret shell companies in the Cayman Islands in order to receive profits from chemical induced abortions. So that that drug, Texas was the great state of Texas was the one to sue the FDA last November saying that the Clinton era approval of this drug was totally crooked. And in the book, I actually document how just how crooked this was. It was the Rockefeller Foundation in partnership with a few other contrologarchs who brought this drug from a German company whose roots were in Nazi Germany. IG Farben's successor entity is called Huxde G. Huckst developed this drug that kills infants en masse or kills the new, I guess, fetuses en masse. And, you know, the you use tax exempt resources. This is what the Rockefeller Foundation does. They use tax exempt resources in partnerships with the government and the Clinton administration to bring this drug to market. Now it turns out that this is actually one of the most painful ways of having an abortion for a woman. And then you've got billionaires profiting from it. So I thought that was pretty pretty grotesque. You know, the a lot of the world economic forum stuff has been talked about. Yuval Noah Harari. I know you've talked about him a lot on the show. But just some of the some of the things that they are pouring billions of dollars into, whether the AI and the Neuralink type companies, microchips, brain microchips, with the test subjects being animals for now. I mean, actually, FDA just approved Neuralink for human trials. I thought this was all conspiracy theory stuff, microchips in brains. It's real. It's happening. Over 10,000 people have received microchips in their brains to ostensibly the the thin edge of the wedge is, to cure paralysis. But, of course, in the hype videos, it's like psychic text messaging and ultimately, like, VR porn, I guess, beamed directly into your brain stem. That kind of was shocking. And, it sounds like conspiracy theory stuff, but just go look at the videos on their websites. I mean, this is what they're trying to bring about. I mean, the founder of the Oculus Rift, is trying to make nerve implants to make VR porn more realistic. Zuckerberg has got patents, and patents is a huge theme in the book. I mean, that's what it's all about is patents equal profit. Zuckerberg's patenting things like Nu Skin and haptic suits so that when you're living in a virtual world, can you know, it's like Ready Player One type stuff. So it used to be dystopian future science fiction. It's all here. It's all now, and it's pretty shocking stuff. Speaker 1: So to reemphasize the abortion pill. Welcome back, everybody. Email us freedom@freedomcharleykirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Joining us now is one of my favorite guests, Heather McDonald. Heather, welcome back to the program. I want everyone to check out When Race Trumps Merit. So Heather, there's been several stories. Haley Biden carjacked in DC, eight teenagers charged with murder in Las Vegas of a young white man, San Francisco that's cleaning up all the streets for Xi, which is a separate issue in some way, but we see we see all these different stories and we're getting more and more emails. Do you think that white America is starting to wake up, that there is a multidimensional, multi institutional war against white people in this country? Speaker 18: Well, we haven't figured out a language yet to really talk about it, Charlie, that will be acceptable to even many conservative ears. But I certainly hear that from students. I was at the University of Virginia last week, and a young student that I was speaking with said that there is a growing awareness among young people, especially for white males, that they are absolutely pariahs in our society. They are going to be the last admitted to schools, excuse me, the last fired, the first fired. And so it is a reality, and it is a reality that is absolutely denied by the entirety of of our mainstream society and by many conservatives. But we need to keep pointing this out because there is no grounds whatsoever for European the inheritors of European civilization to cancel it. Now those inheritors may be people of all different colors, but the the people that are under attack are the Caucasian inheritors of that civilization. And at this point in world history, we have nothing to apologize for because any violations of human rights, and human rights is, of course, exclusively a European Western concept, violations of those rights, whether it's American slavery or imperial atrocities, pale in comparison to every other civilization's ongoing atrocities and violence. Speaker 1: So Heather, I mean, another example, at Louisiana Tech, a black student stabbing for white women is just another story that has happened. I do think that there is a greater and greater understanding and agreement that the laws, the enforcement laws, the lack of media coverage, it's almost fashionable to hate white people. Now, I guess the next question is, Heather, what next? Would it be helpful for, you know, white people or white America to recognize and realize this and talk about this more? Because anytime we notice it, it's the amazing phrase from Michael Anton. It's not happening, but it's good that it is. Like, we're not allowed to even notice it. Your thoughts, Heather McDonald. Speaker 18: It's not just fashionable to hate white people. It's presidential. You know, we have a president now who goes around at every opportunity, staying the preposterous lie that white supremacy is the biggest threat in this country. And and let's just let's just get the facts out there, Charlie, yet again because this is so completely denied by the media that amplifies the Biden message of white supremacy. If you look at all interracial violence between blacks and whites and whites and blacks, blacks commit 87% of all interracial attacks between blacks and whites and whites and blacks. A black is 35 times more likely to commit an act of violence against a white person than vice versa. And we see it, you know, the the few times when you get the videos and you get either the names that reveal that it's a black perpetrator because of the pseudo Africanist names. We see this happening, and yet we're in an absolute state of denial. So what it's gonna take, what sort of politician or leader to articulate that reality, it it remains a a very, very touchy thing. I mean, I can feel it when I go on, you know, what is, for us, the mainstream media, which is Fox News. If you use white in any other context than one of opprobrium, you really are asking to be called a racist by fellow conservatives. And that is preposterous because to say that whites are under attack is not to attack blacks per se. It is to notice the facts, the averages. Of course, there are millions of blacks who are law abiding, who don't want to be treated as perpetual victims and wards of the state. But on average, there is a pathological inner city culture that is creating dysfunction. You have now what's going on, a race hustle on the part of too many Black leaders where they can simply play upon white guilt and claim that it is an accomplishment in itself to be Black. You have the possibility now of specializing in being black just as I could specialize in being female, or gays can specialize in being gay. And that's the one accomplishment that nobody can compete with you And and and it gives you enormous power over the absolute pariahs of straight white males. Speaker 1: And yet we're told that racism is the biggest problem. What what could actually break the matrix, and I don't know if you agree, Heather, I think that it's probably fifty fifty. I don't think every black believes that racism is the biggest problem. I think some have convinced themselves of that, but I think deep down a lot of great Black Americans, they know that there are other problems. Like you said, the pathologies that are put into their culture, right? What is considered to be acceptable? Not staying with the women that you impregnate, so on and so forth. Instead of telling black Americans that they could be great by doing great noble things, we have this self esteem cult of like black girl magic. You're magical because of whatever. It's toxic. And of course, there are tons of problems in urban America and it continues, to this day. Let's just play this this this tape that just went viral here. Play 71. But of course, racism is the problem. Play cut 71. Speaker 6: On my butter. Speaker 12: We do it. Speaker 6: Don't play my slide on post play. It will get like that. Speaker 12: No. No. Speaker 6: No. No. Switches right here. And I picked up That's just enough right there. That's enough. Speaker 12: +1, 23. That's enough. Yeah. Speaker 1: It's I don't know if you saw that video, Heather. It's such a mystery why there are so many murders in the inner city. So Heather, go through the numbers because I think what percentage of murders are committed by black men in the country? You know, crime, is it is it proportional to their population? Speaker 18: Oh, no. It's it's vastly disproportional. Blacks commit about 66% of all violent crime in the country, at least in the 75 largest counties, which is where most of the population resides. Though they're 15% of the population in those 75 largest counties, they commit well over half of all murders. It's it's so disproportionate. It's far more disproportionate than their number in the prison population where they're a third of the prison population. In fact, studies have shown that blacks are less likely to be convicted of felonies, whether because prosecutors just aren't coming down as hard or they've got sympathetic juries. But at at a third of the prison population, that's actually much less than you would expect from blacks involvement in violent crime. But that video is absolutely classic, Charlie. We've seen those videos. The police see those videos all the time. You know, we're supposed to believe that that the problem with these black kids is that they're too poor. They don't have any opportunities as the mayor of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, has said to to justify the the flash mobs, marauding magnificent mile beating up on white tourists. The fact of the matter is blacks are posting inner city kids post videos like that from their smartphones all the time showing off their showing off their money. The social media is the police's best friend because it helps them solve these gang ties. Any kid that has a smartphone is not economically deprived. That kid is richer in resources than than Louis the fourteenth ever was. But we have Speaker 1: That turned is our such a good point. That is so correct. Yes. That's a great point. Speaker 18: Turn our eyes to see because we can't look at it any longer. In the nineties, we were talking about rap music. We were talking about the cop hatred, the misogyny, the homophobia. We were disturbed by it. Now we don't even talk about it. We simply blame ourselves and and feel like it is somehow a violation of racial etiquette to mention these pathologies. And there's pathologies in the white underclass as well. Let's be perfectly clear. But this Charlie, it is so urgent for whites to stop caving into the race hustle because whites Speaker 1: Okay. I think we need to fix Heather's connection. I I wish we could have finished that sentence. We'll fix that connection in a second. Ruff Greens and by the way, let's just summarize it. This is this is so simple. Get married, get a job, graduate high school, don't commit crimes. Period. Ruffgreens.com. You've heard me talk about Ruff Greens and how it's helping dogs. You gotta check out dog food is dead food. Ruff Greens has essential vitamins and minerals, omega oils, digestive enzymes, probiotics, and plenty of antioxidants. Get your free jump start trial bag. All you have to do is cover the shipping. Check it out right now. Roughgreens.com/kirk. That is ruffgreens.com/kirk. You don't have to change your dog's food. Just add a small scoop of rough greens every single day. Has omega oils, digestive enzymes, probiotics. It's incredible. If you have a dog, you've got to check out ruffgreens.com/kirk. That is ruffgreens.com/kirk. Ruffgreens.com/kirk. Check it out right now. Ruffgreens.com/kirk. Heather McDonald continues after the break. She's amazing. Check out her book. It's very, very important. When race trumps merit. More after the break. People ask me everywhere I travel about StrongCell. Charlie, is StrongCell legit? Charlie, do you really believe in the antiaging properties of NADH? Charlie, is this product worth the price? My answer is the same to all of their questions. Yes, yes, and yes. I'm a huge believer in this approach to health and wellness. StrongCell is a scientific breakthrough in cellular health replenishment that combines NADH, co q ten, and marine collagen to boost your body's cellular function. I personally take strong cell every day, and so do a ton of our Kirk listeners. Go see the reviews for yourself. If you are someone who relies on caffeine or sugar just to keep yourself going, then you have to give StrongCell a try. I only have one important request of you. I recommend this life changing product, but you have to give it at least four weeks to realize the best results. It takes a little time to reengineer your body's NADH. Think about it. It's been on the decline for quite a while, and in some cases, for decades. First step, go to strongcell.com/charlie today. That's strongsell.com/charlie and read the personal testimonials for yourself. Then use promo code Charlie to get a special 20% discount on your order. Again, that's strongsell.com/charlie, and don't forget your 20% discount by using promo code Charlie at checkout. Covered a lot. Zuckerberg, Bezos not as much. Who remember, he owns the Washington Post and his ex wife, Mackenzie, like you said, she's worth $35,000,000,000 and she's just spending money like it's going out of style on left wing politics. And then you have Soros. Soros out of the five out of the six no. Out of the five. Out of the five is the most notorious to try to reshape western society. What do what have you discovered about George Soros that you feel does not get enough attention? Speaker 12: Well, you know, there's a question of whether the George Soros would even laugh, and should he be on the cover, would he be alive? He's 93 years old. And so I wanted to see who the next Soros is, and that's Alexander Soros. Of course, George Soros has multiple children. Each one of them funds radical left wing causes. And, unfortunately, his $25,000,000,000 empire is passed in the hands of Alexander Soros, who is much more radical than he is, his father that is his father. Alex Alex Soros has said he wants to use this $25,000,000,000 empire to fund abortion. And, I mean, it obviously calls it women's rights and reproductive health. They all use sort of these euphemisms for the mass extermination of fetuses. But so and and, of course, elections are you know, if Alex Soros lives to the age of his father, our elections are not safe for the next fifty years. Speaker 1: Yeah. The the entire Soros cabal and cartel Soros cabal and cartel is gonna have billions and billions and billions of dollars. Alexander Source, by the way, is more political than the other. I love this clip here. So here you have Bill Gates who wants to be in charge of your childhood vaccinations, food, and health. Play cut 60. Speaker 19: Out there distributing health advice that have a giant hole in their health game. Speaker 13: Yeah. Absolutely. Speaker 19: Like, Bill Gates is a great example of that. He's got this big fat belly, and he's telling people they have to get vaccinated. Like, this kind of binary thinking, this kind of ridiculous way of looking at the world through only pharmacological interventions, through only medicine, through only this, through only that. There's so many different things that you have to do to be healthy. Speaker 1: Yeah. The the the best part of the tape is actually when Rogan just roasts him for for other, physical attributes. Check out the book Controllogarcs. Seamus will continue, after the breakup. Seamus Brunner continues with us. So, Seamus, what piece of research are here in the book that we didn't talk about? Do you wanna make sure our audience is aware of? Just plug your book, Controllogarcs. Speaker 12: I think my favorite chapter was the dystopian present chapter, and that's the one that's all about Speaker 1: Welcome back, everybody. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Make sure you get involved with Turning Point USA. We're getting we're getting Heather MacDonald back. I wanna play this piece of tape. There's several pieces of tape. Let's play cut one eighteen. This, has gone viral, millions of views of a kid's birthday party, and the kids are celebrating with firearms. I wonder if they're loaded. The parents are on board with this. It is a black culture problem, everybody. You know who the first person to say that is? Brandon Tatum. Candace Owens. It's not racism. It's not white supremacy. I'm sorry. This is a this is a major problem. This is a kid's birthday party of six and seven year olds dancing around with handguns. Play cut one eighteen, please. Yeah. But racism is the problem. Right? White supremacy is the greatest threat to the American homeland. And you know what's really sick? And I don't delight in this. That Is some of those kids are probably gonna get killed in a crossfire. First of all, just that that's again just like rule number one, that's against like every rule of how you handle a firearm. Okay? So that that alone should just bother you. Okay? Secondly, you're letting eight year olds dance around with guns? Spare me the lecture that it's white people's fault. Heather McDonald continues. Heather, sorry for the tech issues. You were finishing I don't know if you remember the thought that you were on, but it was important. Do you wanna just summarize what you're talking about? We can go from there. Speaker 18: Well, yes, there's something that white people can do at this point. We get asked all the time to two on these. Well, what can we do to close the academic skills gap? And I say, the we that you're referring to cannot do anything more. The we that you're has been trying for five cost of trillions of dollars of transfer. Speaker 1: Sorry. Sorry. The the the tech the tech just is not there today. Maybe we'll be able to fix it. What I think Heather was saying is that the we you're referring to have done far enough. I wanna play this piece of tape. I don't know if we have my answer to it, but this is important. Some of the biggest pushers of white supremacy being the problem are white people. It is self loathing. By far, the most pushers are white people. I would say there's plenty Al Sharpton and all of are there, but okay. Well, that's fine. Blake is contributing. I'll I'll read what he has to say in a second. Blake got one nineteen. Speaker 20: You you made a claim that the family is the bedrock of a civilized society or a productive society. How do you define a family? Because in the February that humans have existed on this planet, the nuclear family where you had where you had a single breadwinner, 2.6 children at a white picket fence is barely a 100 years old. It's a post war phenomena based on on the wealth after World War two. So would you consider a family, a same sex couple, for example, a legitimate family that provides us bedrock for society. And also, you know, we can also remember that interracial families were once illegal as well, you know, so the idea of a family has changed in human history. It used to be extended. Anyway Speaker 1: That's not that's not the tape I wanted, but the the dialogue goes on for him mentioning that blacks are treated terribly later in the discussion in the criminal justice system. And my answer is, stop committing crimes. I think a lot of people are waking up because we the the culture, not us, the culture way overplayed their hand when it came to racism being the problem, white supremacy. And I think when you start to see videos like that kid's birthday party and the graduation of blacks waving around guns, like, yeah, time out. Enough blame, Whitey. In fact, we have one of our most viral clips at NAU where a black student says, well, isn't it white people's fault? Like, why is it white people's fault that black men don't stay with the women that they impregnate? How is that my fault or the white race's fault? How is that white supremacy's fault? The answer and by the way, just so we're clear, 70 plus percent. So ish, depends on what city, but it's right around 75%. So about one in four ish, but we'll round down. 70% of black men abandon the women they impregnate. White people are not to blame for that. Candace Owens joins us next. Speaker 12: Purchases products and sell them to us cheap Chinese goods, just for money and that, you know, all that all of our businesses and the hollowing out of our manufacturing sector, it was all just about money. That's not the case. The people in this book like the Chinese model. They like this state run, capitalism model where, you know, a few select corporations can really make it rich while the rest of the people, if there's any dissent, instantly clamped down on, instantly disappeared. I mean, you see it with the COVID. You saw it with the COVID lockdowns. That was modeled after China's zero COVID policy. And even after China's zero COVID policy was shown to be an absolute failure, I mean, when you saw Shanghai residents locked down for days or weeks at a time, even after the the zero COVID policy was a failure, you still see these guys like Bill Gates advocating for lockdowns. And so the sort of collusion between Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci and both of their favor towards China, that's a huge problem. The social credit score is what I believe the end game is. I think the book shows that they're supporting millions and billions of dollars into digital ID efforts. Just last week, Bill Gates and the United Nations and the Rockefeller Foundation hosted an event called fifty in fifty, how 50 countries within five years are going to be rolling out these digital ID regimes, the central bank digital currencies. You know, these all sound like conspiracy type terms, but I know you know, Charlie, I know your audience is smart. They know that these are full speed ahead. The Atlantic Council also last week said that DBDCs are maintaining momentum, strong momentum through into 2024. The Fed is working on CBDC. The World Bank and the Bank of International Settlements love the idea of a global CBDC. You know, that the CBDC combined with the digital ID, combined with the information control is like game over. Speaker 1: One minute, Seamus. With your research, what is their vulnerability? What is their weak spot? Speaker 12: Well, it's it's We The People. We need to band together. If you're not doing something to counteract this force that is being exerted upon you, you need to, at the very least, spread the word. Our founders were right that, you know, that's why shows like yours are important. Getting the information out there, even, you know, just liking and subscribing and sharing, as dumb as that may sound, really is important and and evangelizing to your relatives and being you know, it's hard if you don't have the facts and you try to go to Thanksgiving dinner and convince your liberal uncle Larry of something, you know, you're not gonna make much headway. You gotta have the facts and the figures, then you'll, you know, talk to him and ask him what he thinks and ask him to explain his position. You'll find nine out of 10 times they really can't. So we do have an advantage with the fact that the truth is on our side. And the one the other thing that I would say we need to do is correct the imbalance. I mean, the left is just like you know, people like George Soros, though it's like an endless ATM for left wing causes, and there are Endless. Great conservative pay Yeah. Speaker 1: Gotta run. Speaker 12: Great conservative donors. We need more. Speaker 1: Seamus Brunner, excellent work. Controllogarchs, thank you so much. Everyone check it out. Joining us now is James Lawrence, attorney for the Legal Defense Fund for Douglas Mackie. James, thank you for taking the time. James, our audience is familiar, with this story and with what's happening, with mister Mackie. Just give us an update. How is Douglas doing personally? Speaker 11: Thanks again, Charlie, for having me on to discuss this case. So to get your audience up to speed, on October 18, the federal district court judge in Brooklyn, New York sentenced mister Mackey to serve seven months in prison for violating federal law under allegedly under 18 USC two forty one. So seven months in prison, which will start in January. So he was ordered to report to prison in January. And then importantly for your audience to know, he asked for the sentence to be stayed pending appeal. So his legal team right now is in the process of appealing the conviction to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. And so his defense asked for the district court judge to allow the appeal to go forward and for his sentence not to start until all appellate options had been exhausted. The judge denied that request and ordered him to report for the start of his sentence beginning in January. And another point for your audience to be aware of, again, send us on October 18. On October 17 Speaker 7: The voice of generations is the Charlie Kirk Show. Speaker 1: Okay, everybody. Welcome back. Just briefly, Noble Gold Investments. Check it out. I'll tell you more about this later, but Noble Gold is seeing a huge investment of gold buyers from billionaires to multimillionaires to institutional investors. The people who are not afraid are those that invest in gold from Noble Gold Investments. That's noblegoldinvestments.com. Use promo code Charlie to bag a free five ounce America to beat up a coin with each gold or silver IRA. If you qualify, that's noblegoldinvestments.com. Joining us now is the great Candace Owens. Candace is forty weeks pregnant, everybody. So she might have to leave at any moment's notice. Thank you for taking the time. Candace, had a viral interview with Tucker yesterday, but after that or right as the interview was posted, Ben Shapiro tweeted at a Bible verse that you tweeted, which I found to be totally out of line and kind of triggered this massive Internet dispute, and he effectively asked you to resign from the Daily Wire. Candace, what is going on here? Speaker 10: Well, first, I just wanna say that I think people thought it was like all of this was like suspicious timing and that there's no conspiracy theory here. First and foremost, I had signed Donovan Tucker weeks ago. So this interview was already planned. And then obviously, the night before the video of Ben saying some remarks about me went viral. And then minutes before my Tucker interview aired, he did tweet that and I haven't yet gotten any clarity on what the significance of that tweet was. Me posting the Bible passes was just basically me calling for peace and accepting you know, the things that you can't change. And I definitely have had a very peaceful, happy end of pregnancy. And so I didn't and still don't really understand the nature of the tweet, but I did feel compelled in this instance to answer more strongly because it was a biblical passage. And I have said for a very long time that it does feel like Christians are always being told to shut up. And when you share just a biblical passage and it's somehow being construed or being told that there's something wrong with this passage, it was important for me as a Christian to defend our faith. Speaker 1: Yeah. Totally. So this has kind of been simmering for a couple of weeks. So just by background, Ben at a private event spoke to a group of people, and I wanna make sure I'm very clear and specific. He said something on the lines of you have faux sophistication on the matter, Candace. That was his quote. What is he talking about here? I mean, I follow you on social media. I'm a very pro Israel person. Right? I get accused of being a Jewish shill on a daily basis. Like, what what is Ben talking about here? And then secondly, why of all the tweets that he decided to ask you to resign, did he choose a bible verse? Speaker 10: Charlie, you your questions are the same questions that I have. I what what I have said on Tucker and what I will say here is that I think a lot of people who are emotionally involved in the conflict overseas are perceiving people that are actually moderate as radical. And they're not able to see that maintaining a level head is okay. And I think that when they have the benefit of hindsight and it's 2020, they're going to maybe regret some of the things that they've especially amongst their most fervent to to their most fervent allies and supporters, which is why on Tucker, I even brought up the concept of the attacks that have been constant against you. And if it's it's sort of like if you don't veer into radicalism right now, then they take everything. There's an extreme sensitivity there, you know? And every comment that you make, and I can correlate this two weeks ago when I was quite literally, I I sent two tweets back to back about Brian Mast and his comments in in congress being wrong as somebody that is a citizen congressman about saying there's no such thing as innocent civilian life. And then I followed it up by saying, you know, any sort of genocidal language is wrong no matter what government's coming from. I was referring to the American government, And the backlash that I got for saying genocide is always wrong, it's bonkers. I still can't comprehend it. It's such an easy statement for everyone to agree with. Every single person should have said, amen, amen, yes, agree. Genocide is always wrong and unjustifiable. And yet people read in between the lines and said that this must be you're saying this is happening, and it's like, no. But people, that is literally you applying your emotion, and it's utterly illogical. And I think we are living in times right now where it's really scary to see how much emotion people are having, that basic statements. And if I tweeted right now, pedophilia, no matter where it happens in in the world, is always wrong. Is that a statement at certain times okay? Is that statement at certain times not? So I have been trying to understand really what's going on, and the only thing that I can come up with is that people are highly emotional and they're not thinking straight right now. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. That that's that's an eternal statement. Right? It's it's true regardless of what's happening. I I wanna just reinforce this because you bring up a really important point. And for the record, I've always gotten along well with Ben. I've known Jeremy for a long time, but I I call balls and strikes where I see it. And, Candace, I think it's been super unfair the way some people have been treating you and and really unfair because look. I know your heart too. I I tweeted this yesterday. Candace Owens flew eighteen hours through a brutal European connection to go to the embassy opening in Jerusalem, and we toured Israel together. And you you and I were on campuses multiple times together defending Israel and defending the Jewish people. And so I just find a lot of the coverage to be, you know, vitten not a lot, but but some people's chattering has been highly emotional. And so let's just you talked about this in the Tucker interview, Candice. If somebody in the audience is a very pro Israel person, can you bring them up to speed as how their cause is actually weakening by how they are going after allies? And I'm afraid that they are diluting and cheapening the term antisemitism the same way they've done with racism. Speaker 10: There's no question that they've diluted it. People are not even blinking now to be called an antisemite because, you know, when you start with Richard Spencer and you end with Charlie Kirk and you say everybody's an antisemite and everybody's trafficking in antisemitic tropes, you've just lost the plot. I mean, it's in everybody from Joe Rogan to Tucker Carlson last night for God knows what reason being called an anti Semite, and it's it's just completely a losing argument. And so it's funny because I've had some, you know, pro Israel friends that reached out to me and were saying, well, we're just trying to help you. And this time I asserted myself and I said, you need to listen to me. It's obvious to everybody that's looking around right now that there has been a loss in support for Israel, and that's not because any person agrees with what happened on October 7. We have all said on our platforms multiple times that what happened on October 7 is completely abhorrent, but it has a lot to do with the reaction of going after allies for asking questions, for trying to remain not neutral, but humane throughout this and saying that it is always sad. Like people were upset when I said it's always sad when you see a dead child. And some of the upset said, well, can't say that unless you say that also they were just being used as human shields. It's no, you can feel sympathy, you can feel empathy for individuals always, no matter what is going on. You don't need to gauge or jump into a political debate to acknowledge that you're still a human and you have a human response to seeing a dead child. And so what I have said from the very actually, before any of this on my show, is that when you use terms too much and you refer to everybody as something, whether it is a racist, a sexist, a homophobe, you will then find that those words have no power. And I do think that part of the frustration that some people that are parishial are having is trying to understand why this word has no power anymore. And I can explain it over and over, but I can't help people understand it. You saw it happen with Black Lives Matter. First, people were so scared of being called a racist. It was such a horrible smear, horrible libel, like what do I do to not be called that? And then as they started calling everything racist, you started realizing air was racist. And the CNN articles were saying, you know, white people blinking was racist. It became, okay, now we know that this word actually doesn't mean what you're saying, it just means that you want me to submit to whatever it is that you're saying very easily because you've used a smear. You've called me a holocaust snire, you've called me an anti Semite, You've said my silence is violence. And actually what you're trying to do is you're trying to assert control over me while claiming that you are the victim in this. But actually you're trying to assert power over me. And that's not the way to do it. You have to be well intended. And Dennis Prager has always made that point, by the way, for years and years that you have to be very careful when you use a word like that because it will lose power very fast. And unfortunately, his warnings were not heated in this circumstance and people are just don't believe it when you when things people are being called anti Semitic anymore. Speaker 1: Dennis warned us about this. He said an attack used too much loses its power. And you and I both Right. Were kind of we we both still consider Dennis a great friend and a great teacher. And Dennis says he's very careful using that label. He said, because I we want it when we need it, when there's a legit antisemite. And throwing it around as a thought terminating cliche or a means of control or hyper emotional does no one a good service. So so, Candace, let me ask you, because not everyone listens to your show, which is excellent. Everyone should subscribe to her show. There there's a lot of not not a lot. There's a fair amount of rumor or mystery of what you stand on on the war. Can you just the floor is yours. What do you what is your position? Because I think people are completely misinterpreting your views of the Jewish people of what's happening in Israel. Just explain to our audience just to kinda cut off the rumors at the pass. Speaker 10: Yeah. Thank you so much for asking, and and that's what I've said is nobody even asks anymore. And then when you give them an answer and you say, I've said this on my show multiple times, then they say to you, well, I don't listen to your show and, you know, you should tweet it. I'm like, well, my show is posted the full show is posted on Twitter every single day. Oh, well, I don't follow this account. So it becomes not about whether or not what you said or what you didn't say, it becomes about whether or not they were on Twitter at the moment and saw what you said. Otherwise, it doesn't count. You know? And so that's been very interesting. And again, a way to assert power and control and to say that you need to say it when I am online and on whether it's Instagram or Facebook or Twitter. I if I didn't see it, it didn't actually happen, which is completely foolish. But I have not shifted my views at all at at all when it comes to Israel and Palestine, whether it is Ukraine or Russia, whether it is Afghanistan. America has issues at home. We do not need to be sending more money overseas. It is the perspective that is held by Thomas Massey, is now being harassed and being called an anti Semite for his consistent voting against sending any dollar overseas throughout his entire career, right? He has not changed, he has not switched up, so this is not something that is being guided by a hatred or a love of people based on their race at all. It is just my policy, my stance is that America is falling apart. The politicians that are opining on stage and saying, well, we can do both. Look around you, obviously we can't. America is in steep decline educationally, socially, and morally. And I have also been clear that I understand the sentiments coming from white Americans that are saying, why are we suddenly being told now to care about the university debacle? Well, we have been calling this out for years. And Charlie, the you're perfect person to speak about this. You and I have traversed universities. We have been drowned out. We have been harassed. We have been chased out of restaurants for our ideas That's correct. As conservatives, and nobody cared. We couldn't get people to stop funding these universities. We could not get people to understand how bad the problem had become when you actually had professors, forget the students that were protesting, you had professors that were tweeting, all I want for Christmas is a white genocide. I believe that was at Drexel University in Pennsylvania, and that faculty member was protected, calling openly for genocide of white people. So it is a fair question. It is a fair critique when people say, why are you telling us this is a problem now? And this has a problem that many of us have been fighting for the last decade, and it seemed like nobody cared. And so by being fair in that assessment, by recognizing what white people have gone through in this country, by recognizing this, what I consider myself to be America first stances of the problems that are happening in this country, And by saying that I do not want to be involved in another Middle Eastern conflict, no matter where the stage is. People hear that in this moment as some form of antisemitism. It's not. It's consistency. It is the reason that I quoted Thomas Sowell on last night's episode that he has a quote about the civil rights era. He's referring to black America in this quote, but saying, when people are used to special treatment, sometimes being treated the same can feel like discrimination. And it's not discrimination to say that the obvious truths that we are facing in this nation. You can debate that academically, but don't be disingenuous and call people anti Semites for holding the same decisions that they have always held for the last decade. Speaker 1: Yeah. Your position has large agreement in many political circles. By the way, it's also held by people from Thomas Massey to Dennis Kucinich to Rand Paul to a certain extent. And you can have dis disagreements without having to throw around some of those vile labels imaginable. Candace, we're gonna continue after the break. Subscribe to the Candace Owens podcast. Candace is special. We have her back a 100%. And let's just take a pause. What's really going on here? That's what we're gonna talk about after the break. Email is freedom@CharlieKirk.com. Speaker 11: My wife gave birth to the couple's first child, and Doug couldn't be there, Charlie. He was not present at the birth of his first child because he he was in federal district court the following day in New York City awaiting awaiting sentencing. It's just another aspect of this case that's heart wrenching and troubling on every level. We've talked about it previously. The First Amendment problem. The Fifth Amendment problem, and with respect to the conduct of the trial itself, the Sixth Amendment problem. And then you compound all of those constitutional issues, which are profound and downright disturbing, and add on top of that the personal impact of missing the birth of your firstborn child and compounded with, hey. You're gonna have to report to prison in January. So that's the latest. Speaker 1: So in in American history, James, has someone been sentenced to federal prison for a speech crime such as this in the history of the republic? Speaker 11: Well, this is this is the first prosecution of its kind, Charlie, under 18 USC two forty one. And, this was a statute that was passed in 1871. It was aimed at preventing the Klan from exercising power and intimidating African Americans and who were who were newly emancipated from slavery. No such prosecution has been brought in the history of our country under that statute. Now, I mean, can can speech provide a, a predicate basis for criminal liability in other contexts? Yes. But it's we've maintained in court filings. This is Speaker 7: Waking up the woke. Speaker 5: Oh, you should get over that quickly. Speaker 7: One brainwashed radical at a time. Speaker 1: That's enough. Speaker 7: It's the Charlie Kirk show. Speaker 1: Preserving liberty means more to me than anything else. Speaker 6: You see, we're a very important Speaker 1: time in our nation's history. You look around in this room. Don't give me this nonsense that Americans are giving up. That is not true. Okay. America Fest. That's amfest.com. Get your tickets right now. Amfest.com. Biggest speakers in the whole movement, Tucker Carlson and many others. We continue with Candace Owens in just a second. Alright. Candace Owens continues with us. Candace, I'm I'm curious. Has Ben Shapiro called you privately to try to fix this, or is this all just been a public dispute? Speaker 10: It's all been public. I'm I've been, you know, very surprised by it. It's like I said on Tucker last night, something that I think is unfairly a blemish to the Daily Wire because, you know, the four of us, other hosts that work here at the Nashville campus are, we get along very well, you know, and I think that this looks like something that it's not because Ben is not a part of the day to day operations. And I'm not sure why his instinct is always to air something publicly. You know, Charlie, you and I worked for years together. We have had so many disagreements. I would call you, text you directly, yell at you, you know, that's that's healthy, you know? But I I would never just throw out a random tweet and expect you to see it when we were having any of those disagreements. When people text me and say, disagree with Charlie on this, I will just text you, like now up until this day. You know, what did you mean by this? Why are you doing this? Yes. We have to be able to have healthy dialogue and healthy instinct even when we are not understanding each other. Doesn't make it better to let things become public fodder. And it's why I did not want to meet Ben where he was at in engaging anything that was disparaging about him. Because look, I'm 34 years old, I have my third kid on the way. I know how to communicate like an adult. And so, yeah, I don't still yet fully understand where he is coming from. And I do think that we have all tried to be exceedingly understanding of his emotions during this time, as somebody who has familial ties to Israel. And understanding that over the last five weeks, it's been a very emotional time for him. And that's, you know, the human place that I have tried oops. Sorry. Dropped something there. The, you know, the human angle that I have tried to take in trying to perhaps understand why he is airing some of this publicly. Speaker 1: Yeah. Look. I I as I said, I've known known Ben for a long time. I hope he fixes that because leadership should not leadership should warrant the tough conversation and to do it in private. It's by way, it's not good for the movement. It's not good for the Daily Wire. We need the Daily Wire. Need the Daily Wire strong. It's an important company. Those amazing things. Walsh knows Knowles, Jordan, yourself, all that good stuff. So, Candace, fine. Just a couple minutes remaining here. This Israel issue, I'm afraid, is breaking both the left and the right simultaneously in different ways. What can we do to make sure that doesn't happen? On the right. The left can they can go to hell. Speaker 9: On the right. Speaker 10: Well, we need to act like conservatives. We need to practice what we preach. We talk about free speech. We can't suddenly buck the trend of free speech because we're angry or we're upset. We talk about the need for more dialogue. We talk about the need for less libel. We talk about the need for less smears in the media. We cannot engage in that. We can't engage in the behavior of left ists just because we have become upset or an issue is close to us. Consistency is what is called upon. We must remain ideologically consistent. I think it's important to call balls and strikes within our own movement, but and I think that that's part of the problem is that many people are not, as I've spent our calls in behaving with consistently conservative principles on these matters. And I'm seeing a lot of behavior that mimics BLM right now. And that is going to, without question, cause a fracturing in the movement by people that are well intended. And look, I think that we were all way already sensing this sort of civil war in the conservative movement. And I think that's best represented by the very different perspectives that even the candidates that are running have. Are we America first? Do we believe that we should be engaging in overseas conflict all the time nonstop? We are, I think, as Vivek Ramaswamy said, going through this sort of adolescence period of trying to define what the conservative party is. And I I think it's changing. I think Trump was a huge part of that sea change, obviously, and and realizing that there's a frustration. I think younger conservatives feel a little disconnected and detached from some of the older conservatives in the movement for certain reasons that have become accustomed to military, industrial complex instincts, and constantly saying that our allegiance somehow be overseas, and they become accustomed to constantly being involved in overseas complex. And I think that we want something different. And the first thing that we want that is something different is healthy debate, and demanding healthy debate. Demanding full throated discussions and not emotional responses no matter what happens. Whether Russia invades Ukraine, we deserve a full throated debate about whether or not we should be sending billions of dollars unaccounted for over to Zelenskyy. And whether or not it's COVID policy, no matter how fearful people are, we deserve to have a full photo debate about how we live in a COVID era. Do we still have our freedoms or do we become people that are suddenly authoritarian because we have fears? That is the future of the Republican Party that I want to see, is are people that can look back and say, whether you agreed with me or did not agree with me, I remained consistent, and I hope that you respect that. Speaker 1: I'll give some advice. Candace Owens is undefeated, everybody. So be careful fighting Candace Owens. Doesn't end well for you. Candace, God bless. We have your back and have that baby. We'll talk to you soon. Speaker 10: Thank you so much, Charlie. Such a pleasure to always join. Speaker 1: Thank you. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. Enjoy Jack Passoeck. Third hour coming up. Speaker 11: Justice is contemplating just that. Other prosecutions predicated on the spread of misinformation and disinformation. And, Charlie, as we know from the COVID pandemic, today's misinformation and disinformation and conspiracy can be tomorrow's conventional wisdom. It's a path we can't go down. It's Pandora's box that we can't open. It's been opened in mister Mackey's case, and it has to be shut down on an appeal. And, again, that's why we're asking your audience to go to memedefensefund.com. Speaker 1: Douglas Mackey's case is the basis for the the Smith case against Trump. Same law, they escalate and they elevate. So, James, tell us about that. And by the way, it's memedefensefund.com. This impacts every single every single patriot out there that you could you could be a young man who now is a father. He misses the birth of his son so that these cockroaches, these maniacs, these vermin and swine can bring him in front of a judge to put him in federal prison for seven months, and there are no victims. James, I just want you to reiterate that. Who was victimized by his meme? Tell a bad joke and you go to jail? Speaker 11: Well, Charlie, the the government did not put on, did not forecast before trial and at trial, did not put on a single witness that said, I saw this meme. I was confused. And as a result, I texted my vote and didn't exercise my right to go to the polls or vote by mail or whatever other legal mechanism of voting was available to that person at the time. So not a single person, not a single confused voter who did not get to exercise their right to vote. And yet Douglas Mackie is going to prison for seven months anyway under this ruling and under the verdict unless it's overturned on an appeal, which is again why it's why it's so critical that we had the theory of prosecution at off of the past. And and and another thing for your audience to know, you know, we talk a lot of this country about our democracy, and people make allusions to it that our democracy in the case of former president Trump is under attack in many ways in the ways that he's trying to curtail the influence of the administrative state. It's important for your audience to know that Congress repeatedly considered whether or not to create criminal liability around election misinformation and disinformation. They considered various proposals to do that, and they rejected them. It never passed a proposal like this never passed the House or the Senate and and was signed into law by a duly elected president. And yet Mr. Mackey asked to report to prison in January anyway because the administrative state, the deep state, was able to stretch and contort a statute from 1871 to achieve an outcome that was not politically viable or could not be pushed through the congress. And and and that is really what the regime means when it talks about our democracy. It's not about voting. It's not about elected representatives voting. It's about unelected prosecutors and bureaucrats using statutes to enact its will and impose its will on the American people without votes. Speaker 1: Christina Wong tweeted on 11/08/2016, hey, Trump supporters. Skip poll lines at election two thousand sixteen and text in your vote. Text votes are legit or vote tomorrow on Super Wednesday. Christina Wong is still making jokes, was never investigated or indicted, and Christina Wong continues a living a free life. Meanwhile, Douglas Mackie did the exact same thing, even less blunt, by the way, and he is going to federal prison. The website is memedefensefund.com. Everyone should contribute memedefensefund.com. So James, what is your approach for the appeal going to be? First amendment protections, fifth amendment protections, what will your approach be for appeal? Speaker 11: Well, Doug's appellate team will undoubtedly raise arguments under the first, fifth, and sixth amendments. I mean, as the first amendment issues are are are have been talked about quite a bit. The fifth amendment issues relate to the use of a very vague statute. Again, as I mentioned in the opening segment, this is a law that was passed in 1871. And it is the text of the statute bars conspiracies to injure, quote unquote, to injure individuals in their exercise of protected rights. And so one of the arguments I'm sure his appellate team will make is that the statute itself is impermissibly ambiguous and vague, and attack it on on a void for vagueness challenge under the Fifth Amendment for lack of notice under the due process clause. You know, the Sixth Amendment issues relate to, among other things, mister Mackey's defense not being able to cross examine a confidential government witness who was allowed to testify basically under shield on the nature of that individual's ongoing relationship with the FBI. Under the sixth amendment, criminal defendants have a right to cross examine their accusers in public in open court. And one of the problems among others with this prosecution is that Mr. Mackie didn't get to do that in violation of the Sixth Amendment. And again, this is bedrock stuff. I mean, this goes back to the right to confront your witnesses in in public and open court goes back to sir Walter Raleigh, the the the namesake of my hometown, who was locked away in the Tower Of London precisely because he could not cross examine his witnesses in open court. That's why we have the sixth amendment. Speaker 1: Yeah. No kidding. So and then I mentioned this before the break. Is there an equal protection argument here potentially? I mean, they they don't enforce this against Christina Wong who has obviously did the exact same thing. Speaker 11: Right. No. I that's that's another that's another avenue, for sure is the, selective prosecution. Though defendants, in in many cases, try the that argument. And and certainly, in this case, as you pointed out in the open, you've got similarly situated individuals engaged in similar conduct. But I think that's a that's a harder harder case a harder case to make than than some of the other other arguments. That's just my my impersonal view of it. But Doug's appellate team will will handle all of that. Speaker 1: Yeah. The prosecutorial discretion that we give the federal government, is remarkable. James Lawrence, thank you so much. Memedefensefund.com. Help out Douglas Mackie, a young man going to jail because he told a bad joke. You are living in The Soviet Union. James, thank you so much. Speaker 11: Thank you. Speaker 1: Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast receiving thousands of emails regarding the first hour that we did about this New York Times 2024 poll, but we have election day tomorrow. If you live in Virginia, major election day tomorrow. Play cut one. Speaker 21: We've delivered results, and that's why I'm excited about what's gonna be on the ballot. I think we can hold our house and flip our senate. We can keep going because there's so many more important topics for us to focus on. Speaker 1: There's a huge push in Virginia to turn I think they call it the Virginia House of Delegates. Right? To flip it. Going all in on early voting, going all in on ballot chasing. Could this end up demonstrating and showing a path forward? Glenn Youngkin has a serious favorability rating. Could be a template. Could end up being a blueprint for 02/2024. We're we're about to find out how smart Glenn Youngkin is, by the way. Glenn Youngkin avoiding the 2024 race, he's a smart guy. Unlike Ron DeSantis, he's like, yeah. I don't know if I wanna see myself getting into that. Some people say, oh, do you think he'll be vice president? Trump will never pick a vice president taller than him, so that's probably not gonna happen. And so Glenn Youngkin putting together a a blueprint in Virginia. If he stays out of the presidential race and flips the house of delegates and gets behind Donald Trump, I'll have a lot of respect for that man. So I'm cheering for him. I really like what he's doing. He's doing the tough work. He's focusing on governing in Virginia and avoiding some of the national political chatter. Speaker 7: If you wanna wear three masks outside, then listen to public radio. Speaker 22: Fresh air. Speaker 7: Breathe free. It's the Charlie Kirk show. Speaker 1: Welcome back, everybody. Email is freedom@charliekirk.com. I wanna bring to your attention a very important story here, and we have a great guest to walk us through it. So until September, the FCC, the Federal Communications Commission, which we are regulated by here because we are on we are on AM and FM radio, was balanced with two Republicans and two Democrats. Now that it has a Democrat majority, it's starting to enact a very radical social agenda, everybody. And one such radical step just happened. The FCC just recently adopted a, quote, digital discrimination order on a three two party line vote. So here to speak with us today about this is Republican FCC commissioner Nathan Symington, who was appointed by president Trump back in 02/2020. Mister Symington, thank you so much for joining us. Please tell us all about this. Speaker 8: Absolutely. Thanks for having me on, Charlie. So this item that we just enacted at the commission takes a very short section in the 2020. Speaker 1: K. I I I hate to be dark, but it it really it really is something when the FCC guy's Internet is not very good. Is that is that too soon, Blake? I'm kidding. He's a great this is what net neutrality will get you, everybody. Alright. We're gonna get him back in a second. Boy, we've really had we've had the stars aligning with Internet. Everybody, email us freedom@charliekirk.com. We'll get him back. No. This is really important story. All kidding aside. This is why we can't have net neutrality and actually proves the point. The we we've talked before about how the civil rights act passed back in the sixties and all of these civil rights regime laws that followed the the civil rights era laws, I should say. They could be used as skeleton key. Okay, mister Symington. Sorry about that. I don't know what happened, but welcome back. Thanks. Please continue. Speaker 8: Yeah, big tech at it again. So thanks for having me on, Charlie. So as I was saying, this item take the short section in the 2021 infrastructure bill that consists six and uses it to spin out a sprawling government takeover of the Internet. Actions a second six to five zero six did pass with some Republican vote, but its language was not nearly broad enough to support what the Democratic majority just voted to do with it. I'm sure people would not have voted for it if they knew that this was what would follow it. Speaker 1: Well, so look, the the government taking over the Internet sounds very sinister. So I just wanna be very specific. How is the government taking taking over over the the Internet? Internet? I mean, wanna are they gonna, like, nationalize Google? What are they gonna start taking over? Walk us through this. Speaker 8: Absolutely. Well, when people think about the Internet, they think about the sites and apps that they're using. But there's also a lot of physical infrastructure there, and it's very costly. This So is bad in a different way. It's about taking over the physical side, cell towers, fiber optic cables, servers. The justification is that some low income or minority areas have relatively low amounts of high speed internet. The FCC took just three words from the law preventing digital discrimination and decided that these low levels of internet subscriptions show discrimination by cell phone and internet providers just because they exist. Then the majority goes further and says any difference in service can be discrimination. Does one neighborhood have higher prices? Does one place have slower speeds, outdated equipment? If there's any difference, we can call it discrimination and we can find them whatever we want or order them to build whatever they Speaker 1: So what what would the ramifications of this potentially be? Could the FCC just fine you for providing Internet in a racist way as they deem racist? Speaker 8: I mean, pretty much. It's a it's a blank check. They could say, you have to build brand new fiber internet for this one town with 500 people. Some member of congress wants it. And then you have to charge them the same price you charge in Downtown Phoenix, where we'd have 10,000 people on the same line. And if you don't, here's $10,000,000 fine for you. Or here's another illustration. So you're deciding where to build out new fiber service. You're choosing an area between areas where you'd might make 1,000,000 a year versus 2,000,000 a year. The rational decision, of course, is you build out to the area where you're gonna have more uptake. Among other things, that would serve more people. But the FCC could fine you because it turns out that that was a more white area, whereas the $1,000,000 a year area is majority minority. And so the FCC is mandating what amounts to affirmative action and racial quotas for everything that the companies do. Speaker 1: Yeah. So I I wanna I mean, this just sounds like a mafia shakedown. Right? I mean, the the that but I I wanna just make sure we're clear. You said it's a federal government takeover of the Internet. Can you elaborate on that? That specific labeling? Speaker 8: Sure, absolutely. Well, we deal with regulated industries all the time and that's not necessarily takeover. Sometimes it's just everyone coming together and agreeing what they want the industry to look like and putting rules in place. But here there are no standards for when you have to bring a case or not, for how much you can find, for what orders you can give. Basically, there are no rules. And so the real effect is going to be that companies will be terrified because they won't know what they're allowed to do. The real question of what they're allowed to do is going to be determined by how much effort they spend sucking up to the government. And anytime the government wants them to do something, they'll have no choice but to come running and do it because the penalty for not doing that is potentially an endless legal nightmare. Speaker 1: So we've introduced this idea of a skeleton key before. I think Christopher Caldwell's book, Age of Entitlement, talks about how good intentions and a broadly written law can then be really given all the power to the enforcers or to the bureaucrats, and especially for left wing type priorities. Do you think that this fits into the criteria of an idea of a skeleton key law? Speaker 8: Absolutely. So no one is arguing, certainly not me, no one is arguing for the idea that companies should discriminate in how they lay out broadband. But using this idea that any difference in the real world amounts to discrimination is sufficient evidence of discrimination is the way that you turn every three letter letter agency, whether that's us at the FCC, whether that's the Federal Trade Commission, the FBI, the DOJ, whether you turn it in effect into a DEI agency. Every project has to have requirements and preferences, every agency has to be turned into a civil rights agency. So housing and urban development for example, they're trying to make it a legal requirement for cities to build low income housing projects next to or in the middle of any nice neighborhoods they have. There really doesn't seem to be any problem that can't be solved by calling people racist and punishing them for some other unrelated business decision. So another example, another one of the federal telecom agencies, NTIA, I'm an alumnus of them, they're distributing $40,000,000,000 in subsidies to build fiber internet, but they've loaded up the program. It's not just a fiber building program. It's a union labor mandate program. It's a DEI requirement program. It's a preference for government owned internet services program. And so you know, whether or not you think any of those things are a good idea, the point is that they've been put in in regs and therefore the agency has been diverted from its purpose to start doing all of these other DEI type things. Speaker 1: Yeah. So I mean, I guess a question I have is, is corporate America lobbying against all of this? I mean, do the traditional big uglies of the big firms? What where is their stance on this? Speaker 8: Yeah, because you would think that it's in their interest to have as much freedom of operation as possible. And to a degree that's true, and there will be counter pressure coming from some of the big companies in this area. But sometimes they sort of bring it on themselves. So if you look at the item that we just did at the FCC yesterday, when the underlying bill was still in Congress, a lot of corporate lobbyists actually said, we're okay with it. Congress gave them tens of billions in federal handouts as part of the same thing. So despite all those work strings being attached, overall they decided that it was worth it to be bought off. We need them to realize that this is a, in the words of my colleague, Carr, a Faustian bargain. In ten years the handouts will be gone but they'll have this digital equity arbitrage forever. It will never be enough. There's no way that you can ever make someone happy if there's no standard for what compliance is. On the other hand, by the time this comes along, people who were present at the original decision may well have collected their bonuses, retired, it won't be their problem anymore, it'll be our problem. Speaker 1: You stay right there, Nathan. One of the reasons I want to have you on is this is not a rule that's going to get front page New York Times treatment, but it's an excellent example of the subtle yet significant power of the federal bureaucracy, and hundreds of these decisions are made every single year. Not all of them get by the way, not the FCC has a board. Right? Not every agency has a board. And it just so happens, you know, we're here to talk about this. Think about the hundreds of other micro decisions the bureaucracy is making in equity and racial this. It adds up to a less free country. Nathan Symington, please stay right there, excellent job. MyPhD Weight Loss, check it out right now, that's MyPhD D weight loss. It's amazing at myphdweightloss.com. If you want to shed a few pounds, check out my Ph. D weight loss. I have lost over 25 pounds and I have no trouble maintaining it and I feel great. If you need to lose a few pounds, you don't have to do it alone. Give them a call at (864) 644-1900 today and get that first time consultation on your schedule. Your PhD nutritionist can set up a start date together, but don't put off the call. Working that call into my busy schedule a year ago has changed my life and I want the same for you. It is one of the best calls that you can make. So check it out right now, at myphdweightloss.com. Call (864) 644-1900. Call them today right now at myphdweightloss.com. That is myphdweightloss.com. Nathan Symington continues on a very important story that won't get top line coverage, but it goes to show the power of the bureaucracies. Congress didn't vote for this. Bureaucracies just make it up. We'll be right back. Of the people. Patrick, thank you so much for taking the time. Patrick, your book confirms and or the poll, I should say differently. The poll this week from the New York Times confirms the thesis of your book. That's a better way to frame it. Tell us about your book and how also the data is confirming your hypothesis. Speaker 13: So my book is about how essentially the parties, the parties that we knew maybe when I was growing up have just completely reversed themselves in terms of the democrats used to be seen as this party of the working class, party of the people really standing up for the blue collar worker. And really ever since 2016, that really hasn't been true anymore. You've seen this huge reversal in terms of working class voters increasingly voting Republican and voted for Trump in 2016. And more so, a lot of these coal a lot of these groups voted more so in 2020, including Latinos, African Americans. Now that looks to be if if this poll is fracked, it's gonna be like that on steroids in 2024. When you look at Trump being at 22% of the black vote within eight among Hispanic voters, We really are seeing a realignment in our politics. Speaker 1: Yes. So what is driving this? Is it the Republicans embrace of populist nationalist ideas, or is it a combination of academic fantasy ideas of white liberalism that don't resonate with non college educated muscular class voters? Speaker 13: It is it is a it is definitely a combination of both, but I think that, you know, everything that we're seeing out of the college campuses over the last month suggests that the left has really learned nothing about how to moderate their message to appeal to the working class majority of the country who are not interested in these ideas of decolonialization, of intersectionality, of things that are only ideas that only somebody with an advanced degree even could could even fathom. So I I do think that they're just continuing to dig themselves a bigger hole. And you go back to it didn't used to be like this. You go back to as recently as the nineteen nineties. And Bill Clinton, you know, a lot of Republicans didn't like Bill Clinton when he was president, but he is somebody who really moderated his message, said the era of big government is over, signed welfare reform, signed the Defense of Marriage Act. All of these things that, you know, you could not see Joe Biden for all his, like, talk about for all the talk that he is somehow this sort of blue collar working class Democrat. He is just as beholden, I think, to the left as as anyone, and you just don't see that kind of democrat anymore. Speaker 1: Why do you think that is? This Donald Trump obviously changed American politics that will be one of his longest lasting legacies is reshaping the Republican party. Democrats seem comfortable. They don't seem as if they want to win over muscular class voters again. They think they can create a fusion of the permanently government addicted and the hyper educated Boston elite. Why is that? Speaker 13: Well, I think they're going to be net then reduced to that elite. That's what's starting to happen. So this idea is the Democratic Party has always been this coalition of folks who are, you know, these liberals, primarily white liberals, and African Americans, Hispanics, minority voters, right? I mean, has always been kind of the core of the democratic coalition and now we're seeing that break apart where significant chunks of voters in these minority communities have actually started to break off. I know there's been talk about this for decades or poll conservatives have talked about this for decades, but it actually seems to be happening. So what's going on? What's going on is a lot of these groups are actually better off. So you know, under under Donald Trump, Hispanic incomes rose 20%. Speaker 1: Welcome back, everybody. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. It's a very important topic. It's very important. It's not getting a lot of coverage, obviously. Mister Symington from the FCC continues. So I guess the immediate question is, will this affect my own Internet? Speaker 8: Well, it definitely will because the federal government is putting out a huge amount of money for this, but all that money is competing with each other. You know, you can't just wish resources into being by writing a check. Even if you've got the power of the US treasury behind you, there's just physical limitations on how many workers there are, how long it takes to trench and put in fiber, how long it takes to build the tower and hang radios off it, whatever you might want to ask. It's going to make everyone's internet much more over time, more costly and the worst thing is it's going to deflate the value of developing a project. So fewer projects will get developed. Corporations don't just have big plots of money, they go out and get financing just the way that you might take out a construction loan to build an office building or some such. And all of those deals are going to be implicitly deflated by this. So we can expect high priority political areas to get the best results out of this and the forgotten middle to get the worst. Speaker 1: Yeah, that's Can you just kind of speak for a second of how the FCC is composed and how many members of the board are there? Just for the uninitiated to our audience, explain it. And then also explain your purview. Speaker 8: Sure. So with the FCC, there's five of us. That's a recent development because the third Democratic seat was only filled in September. So for most of the Biden administration, there hasn't been a third Democrat and we've been in a two-two situation, which may explain why this item didn't come up until now. But the most important thing about us is that at the commissioner level, we're independent. That means appointed by the president, confirmed by the senate. After that, you cannot get fired unless you're committing crimes. So that lets me get out here and say what I really think without having to worry that that the secretary of something or other is gonna fire me over it. Regarding the purview, so the FCC kinda gets started for two reasons. Number number one, the old AT and T phone monopoly, which was a government backed monopoly that was the alternative. The United States was the only country in the world not to have a socialized national phone system at the time. So we said, no, we're going to let a private company run it, we're just going to supervise it and the FCC was put in place to do that. The other thing was to coordinate radio broadcasting. When radio was a young field, no one knew how to coordinate frequencies and people would just run up the power level and transmitters and try to interfere with each other in the best markets. Obviously, that wasn't workable, so we started a system of assigning frequencies and sort of took it from there. So in the modern day, it's cell phones, it's the phone network, it's also radar, it's satellite communications, undersea cables, pretty much any interstate communication by radio or wire. Speaker 1: So that's very helpful. Thank you. Talk to the processes that there's term limits, right? Is that correct? There are terms on each one of the board members? Speaker 8: Five year terms. Speaker 1: Yeah. And so then what what if there were to be a different winner of the election, like if if Trump, for example, were to win next November, what would that mean for vacancies on the board? Speaker 8: Well, the chairman, or in this case, the chairwoman, it's tradition the chair resigns on inauguration day at So nine Trump's FCC chair, Ajit Pai, still had time left in his term, but he resigned on inauguration day. So the tradition is that every president gets to pick his own chair. Speaker 1: Got it. Me just kind of final question here. You were a federal regulator during the Obama administration. Why were we able to have you come on and say this, and we don't hear this from other agencies like the FBI unless we get a whistleblower? Speaker 8: Oh, I'm sorry, wasn't here for the Obama administration. I took office in 2020. But nonetheless, yes, I'm politically independent. That is a really unique thing about how our agency works, because we have enforcement powers which is like the executive, but we also have rulemaking powers which is like the legislative. And so they made us independent so that we weren't beholden to either one of those because it would be a stealing of power from the other branch, if you see what I mean. Now in the case of some other agency, at the end of the day, the person on top may be confirmed by the Senate and nominated by the president, but is not politically independent. They instead they might serve at the president's pleasure. Well, you want to get on the wrong side of the president, that's a very quick way to get transitioned out of your job. Speaker 1: Nathan Symington, thank you so much. Excellent job. Appreciate it. Thank you. Speaker 8: Huge pleasure, Charlie. Take care. Speaker 1: Email us freedomcharleykirk dot com and subscribe on our to our podcast by going right here. This podcast by the way, podcast is doing very well. Number 11 right now in Apple News, so we'll see if that improves throughout the day. We shall see. 11 in Apple News, so please take out your phone and subscribe to the Charlie Kirk Show podcast. Several stories we have yet to hit, so email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com. President Xi comes and visits one of his colonies. He comes home. He wants to see what he's been buying. He wants to make sure that it's been a good investment for the homeland. Our ruler Winnie the Pooh is on the homeland right now. We are back. Speaker 13: American incomes rose 20%. So there no there's no longer the sense that they are need to be dependent on the federal government. You talk to people. I visited the Rio Grande Valley of South Texas, and you talk to people down there and they want to get ahead by their own hard work and are very suspicious of anyone who is on government welfare benefits. I mean, that is a really big concern. When you talk to people down there, see who talk about, like, why is there a Tesla in front of the unemployment office that shouldn't be happening? So it's a very different kind of politics that I think people on the left and, you know, frankly, some people on the right have assumed about about these people. They want they're achieving the American dream. They wanna get ahead, and they realize the Democratic Party is not helping them get there. Speaker 1: So let's just talk pure numbers in the states that matter, Georgia, Wisconsin, Arizona, maybe Pennsylvania. If these trends continue and Republicans get near 50% or at least near an equilibrium within the margin of error with Hispanics and continue to do well with working class whites, but maybe do a little bit worse with upper middle class white voters, What does that mean? How how significant is the growth in the multi class the multiracial middle class to just get one more vote than the other guy? Speaker 13: I mean, I I think that what Trump showed in 2016 and why the election was so close in 2020 was the fact that this coalition of working class whites and the more African Americans, Latinos punches above its weight in the electoral college. You know, when it comes to the states that will actually decide the election, not just the Rust Belt states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, but also states like Arizona, Georgia, and Nevada. You know, those states have tend to have few graduates than the blue states where primarily all these college graduates, people with postgraduate degrees, people who are listening to the crazy ideas coming out of college campuses now. You know, those are concentrated primarily in blue states. So that's why I think Trump or any Republican candidate would have an advantage in the electoral college by appealing and talking to these voters. Speaker 1: Yeah. If you look so the state with the most college degrees is by far by far Massachusetts, and it's that way every single year, I mean, with Boston and all that. And then Colorado is right up there. It's the second, And then it goes Vermont, New Jersey, Maryland, Connecticut. These are these are traditionally democrat states. And then you go from the bottom up, the ones that have the least college edge by the way, that doesn't mean they're stupid. I don't have a college degree. What it means though is that they have different professions. They'll work with their hands, plumbers, electricians, carpenters, oil fields, entrepreneurs. It's not an indictment of their intelligence. And they also but most importantly, Patrick, author of Party of the People, Different Value Systems. Speaker 13: That is absolutely right. This is a group that has never you know, they have never had anything handed to them. They've had to work for what they have. I And think that just they're unified united by a common sense value system, even if they don't vote Republican. I think that, you know, you particularly talk to try talking, I think about the green new deal or this green transition idea within these minority communities. And the polling is pretty clear on that, that when it comes to people really saying you know, all this stuff about global warming is nice and you hear this in focus groups a lot, but it doesn't help me put food on the table. And I think the real the real trigger as much as, you know, as much as Republicans wanna pat themselves on the back for realigning these voters, the real trigger for this has been the absolute failure of the Biden administration to bring down inflation meaningfully. And the fact that, you know, we've had so much inflation has really hit these voters particularly really hard in the wallet. And these are the voters who are actually paying attention to performance. You know, I think if you if you have a college degree, it doesn't necessarily mean you have more accurate ideas about politics or or the world because I think you're primarily, you're very partisan and you're voting. I think you're very committed to existing your existing ideology and whatever information comes out, really just is gonna push you in one direction or the other. This multiracial populist coalition is very pragmatic, is very common sense, and they can see what's happening. Speaker 1: I I wanna keep on diving into this. But a minute remaining a minute and a half remaining, does the does the working multiracial class you're talking about, if the Republican party were to go to all of sudden and nominate like a Mitt Romney or somebody like that, they wouldn't necessarily be on on board for that. Correct? Speaker 13: Well, I think that is it's a little bit I think we are not going back to that kind of Republican party. That said, I do think that there are a number of candidates running who Speaker 7: Warning. You're entering a not safe for the regime media zone. Facts incoming. Speaker 1: Alright, everybody. Welcome back. Email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Xi Jinping is visiting the colony of San Francisco. This whole thing is very bizarre. So first, Gavin Newsellini goes over to China, he does a visit there. Runs over a bunch of Chinese kids when playing basketball. The whole thing's very strange. You take some sort of GQ Vogue photo op on the Great Wall Of China, his shirt unbuttoned. It's very clear that Joe Biden sent Gavin Newsom. And Joe Biden says, hey, pal. I don't want to make the flight. You go. Because I guess they were doing kind of like a a trip swap type thing. And so Gavin goes to China and Xi Jinping comes to America. So Xi Jinping lands and he's coming to see his colony. He's invested so heavily into capturing the elite of America. And boy, they have delivered. So there's several takeaways here that are critically important. The first of which is the most obvious. When I visited Seattle this last summer, it was a mess. It was dirty. It was filled with vermin and swine and homeless people and degenerates and drug addicts and raging ludicicks come up to your car and start beating. It's a disgusting city. And I started talking to one of the people at my hotel. I said, This is unrecognizable. I said, Yeah, but it was actually pretty nice for a couple weeks this summer. I said, Why? I said, What changed? I said, Well, we had the MLB All Star game in Seattle this summer and they cleaned everything up. I said, Well, isn't it really demoralizing that if all the media cameras are coming, they clean everything up and then they don't care afterwards? Yeah, it's demoralizing, also shows they can fix it. This can be fixed. Urban dirtiness can be fixed. Now I find it hilarious that of all the things that motivate them to clean up the streets of San Francisco, it's Jinping. As many people have been commenting, Gavin Newsom gives a long speech assuring San Francisco homeless they can go back to pooping on the streets once Xi Jinping returns back to China. Play cut six. Speaker 23: I know folks say, oh, they're just cleaning up this place because all those fancy leaders are coming into town. That's true because it's true. But it's also true for months and months and months prior to APAC. We've been having different conversations. Speaker 1: You're not as smart as you think you are, Gavin. It's true because it's true. It also shows elections don't mean anything in California. He knows that he's got that job for life if he wants it. Total totalitarian dictator. Maybe he's not that different than Xi Jinping. So Xi Jinping arrives and Gavin greets him. Hey, old pal. How you doing? Xi Jinping's motorcade drives through San Francisco and it's noticeably clean. It's the cleanest San Francisco has been in multiple generations. Who who would have known? All we have to do to clean up the streets of San Francisco is fly in dictators. Playcut 64. Where are the American flags? What's with all the Chinese flags? Not a single US flag. But to be fair, they probably didn't remove any. You know what they probably had to remove, though? Some gay flags. CCP's not big into pride. It's not a it's not a core Confucian value to have men become women. So they're meeting Xi Jinping and Biden decides to fly in. He's like, oh, I can take the cross country flight. Let's go to cut one zero seven. Speaker 0: Gavin was ready to take the relationship to the next level until he found out there was someone else, Joe Biden. The president flew in on Air Force One. Now Newsom had competition. When Chi saw Joe, they couldn't keep their hands off each other. As Joe likes to brag, he spent more time with Chi than anyone else. Not to mention the fact that Chi's guys bribed the Biden family. The chemistry was unmistakable. Speaker 2: I've never doubted what you've told me in terms of your candid nature in which you speak. Speaker 3: I still remember our interactions very vividly, and it always gives me a lot of thoughts. Speaker 1: Thoughts or thoughts? Speaker 2: That's the question. Speaker 1: So look. The Chinese Communist Party is the great enemy of America, but he comes in and gets a hero's welcome here in the country. And just to be fair, you should always be talking to leaders even if they're their enemies. I totally supported Trump having him over to Mar A Lago, but you gotta be very clear about what you stand for. So Xi Jinping comes to San Francisco. Now the one thing we can hope for is Xi Jinping goes back to China, and he gives a big speech. Speaker 9: We are no longer embracing left wing Marxism. He's like, that's Speaker 1: a mess. Like, he goes back, and he just denounces the whole thing. It's like, jeez. That's what we're heading towards. But understand, the bromance between Gavin, Biden, and Xi Jinping, it's deeper than you might think. China is not an enemy. They're not a competitor. China is the goal. We've said for quite some time that the lack of understanding of Maoism will be our downfall. We are living through a cultural revolution. Xi Jinping runs the Chinese Communist Party. The Chinese Communist Party is the same project started by Mao Zedong. Mao Zedong launched a cultural revolution. He had a moment where people could speak out and there could be free speech until repressive tolerance came. Struggle sessions were Maoist. There were 10 different categories that were created in Mainland China, five for fascists, five for communists. Parents were incentivized to train their kids in the communist way, and the kids were incentivized to turn in their parents if they were not a 100% behind the party. The American leadership look at Xi Jinping and they privately say, man, it must be awesome. Must be awesome, mister Xi Jinping, that you have all this power, that you can do whatever you want whenever you want to do it. The American ruling elite, Gavin Newsom and Joe Biden, they wanna be more like Xi. They don't look at this as a conflict between two countries. They look at America hopefully to become closer to the Chinese Communist Party model. Cut one zero eight, Winnie the Pooh says that China wants to be friends with The US. Yeah. Even though they attack us cyber, they send in their kids to our schools to spy on us, they buy up land near military bases, they dump, steal, solar panels, and critical infrastructure and plastic. They pump fentanyl into our country in the reverse opium wars. They have digital fentanyl through TikTok. By the way, did China ever pay for COVID? Did they ever pay for COVID for creating a virus in the laboratory? Did anyone even mention it? Of course not. Joe Biden is there to go kiss the ring of who's been paying for the lifestyle for the Biden family for years. Play cut one zero eight. Speaker 4: Whatever stage of development it may reach, China will never pursue hegemony or expansion and will never impose its will on others. China does not seek spheres of influence and will not fight a cold war or a hot war with anyone. China will remain committed to dialogue and post confrontation and build partnerships instead of alliances. It will continue to pursue a mutually beneficial strategy of opening up. The modernization we are pursuing is not for China alone. We are ready to work with all countries to advance global modernization featuring peaceful development, mutually beneficial cooperation, and common prosperity, and to build a community with a shared future for mankind. Speaker 1: I mean, everything he's saying is a lie. They they lie professionally. They don't have a moral code like we do in the West. It's all about power. It's all about expanding the Chinese Communist Empire. They own ports of entry all throughout Africa and South America. The Belt and Road Initiative is the recreation of taking over the world. I mean, I can go through the list, and our leaders take it. Our leaders say, oh, yes. Must be so great. What great relations that we have. In a rare moment of honesty, Joe Biden calls Xi Jinping a dictator, Not exactly smart diplomacy, but honestly, I respect the candor. Play cut one zero nine. Are we becoming more like China or is China becoming more like America? The promise of free trade and the promise of neoliberalism is that eventually China would become like America. They become a liberal democracy with private property rights and entrepreneurship and free speech. We were sold by the Mitt Romneys of the world and the Paul Ryans of the world and George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. We were sold by the Bill Clintons, and even to a lesser extent, Ronald Reagan, that eventually China would liberalize and they would just become an open minded country because the more we traded them, the more it changes their values, and the opposite happened. The more that we have traded with China, they have got wealthier, but they've also become less free. They've become far more totalitarian, less open to different and new ideas. Most Americans never used to worry about the Chinese Communist Party until Trump woke us up. And understand the Chinese Communist Party owns Joe Biden, owns many members of the American government. Here's a montage of Joe Biden saying the rise of China was good, of course, because he's on the payroll. He's a traitor to The United States The United States, and he's a agent of the Chinese Communist Party, play cut 67. Speaker 2: Let me be clear. I believed in 1979 and said so, and I believe now that a rising China is a positive development, not only for the people of China, but for The United States and the world as a whole. We want to see China rise, to continue to rise in a responsible way that will benefit you most, China, because you have an important role to play. A rising China can be a significant asset for the region and the world and selfishly for The United States. Speaker 1: He is an agent of the Chinese Communist Party. Are your kids or grandkids spending hours on YouTube and Netflix getting indoctrinated by woke ideology? It's time for you to take control over what your kids are watching and what is going on to shape them as they grow up. Sherwood is a content platform that offers ad free wholesome entertainment for families with traditional values. Make no mistake, the left is pushing their CRT and their trans agenda and it's making its way into kids entertainment. Sherwood has a library of audiobooks, ebooks, videos from classics like Velveteen Rabbit and Treasure Island, one of my favorites, to timeless cartoons and other entertaining content. It's a lifetime subscription to Sherwood Kids. It's usually $750, but this month only you can get a lifetime subscription for just $299. Just use promo code Charlie. Sign up today at sherwoodkids.com. That is sherwoodkids.com. Take back control over your kids' entertainment. Are you tired of playing defense with your kids' entertainment? Well, today, children can't even walk in the library, turn on the TV without seeing progressive nonsense and agendas everywhere. That's why we love Sherwood. It's ad free, wholesome kids entertainment platform that shares your value values. Sherwoodkids.com. Wonderful company. Check it out. Special deal. Sherwoodkids.com. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Open up your podcast app and type in Charlie Kirk show. So much more to cover. Email is freedom@CharlieKirk.com. We'll be right back. Speaker 13: By and large, capitalize on this on these trends. And you see it in a place like Virginia with Glenn Youngkin, you know, who did really well, and we'll see, you know, in the election tomorrow, you know, how well his candidates do. But I do think that, you know, we are permanently on a trajectory, I think here, where people are gonna have to, you know, Republicans are gonna have to realize, you know, it's not, you know, it's not gonna be the case that, you know, you're fully going to go back to where we were before Trump. And I think people in the establishment need to understand that too. Speaker 1: Patrick Raffini, stay right there. We have you for another segment. I encourage people to check it out. Party of the People inside the multiracial populist coalition remaking the GOP. So, Patrick, if you were advising the Republican party to go into 02/2024, there is a open question. Do you try to run up the score in the rules and go straight working class voter, or do we just kind of forget the upper middle class suburban type voter? Is or is it a balance of both for every messaging you do, you know, towards suburban? You might turn off some of the working class folks, or there are issues that can bridge the divide. What would you say, Patrick Rafini? Speaker 13: I think you always have to look at the issues that will bridge the divide because you're gonna you're gonna kill two birds with one stone that way. But what I do think that right now, are very concerned about the border. People are very concerned about the economy and the state the continued high inflation, the fact that, you know, prices are 20% higher than they were when Joe Biden was inaugurated. People are concerned about crime. We used to think about a lot of those issues as base issues, but the failure on those issues has been so great that those are not just base issues anymore. Those are issues that really resonate across the spectrum with independents, moderates, and they also resonate with Hispanics and African Americans too, especially. So I think like, we have plenty of issues. If we can stay focused, I think on those three issues, I think Republicans are gonna be in good shape. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I mean, so the the other question I have for you is that can another candidate other than Trump continue a multiracial type working class coalition? We've seen a little bit of evidence of that with DeSantis in 02/2022, but it hasn't really been replicated. It seems as if rural turnout dives a little bit, that kind of mystery voter is hard to replicate. Can it be done? Speaker 13: I think it can. I think it can in the sense of, yeah, you you have seen it. You you definitely have seen it with DeSantis. You've seen it with a candidate like I mentioned Junkin as well. I do think that in the sense of, I mean, you may have, and when you have candidates like, look, mean, MAGA was not a huge fan of Brian Kemp, but in Georgia, he carried that state in a landslide. Really, he carried by eight points and he won in all the places Trump won, but he added back some of those suburban voters. So, yeah, I think that any of these candidates. Speaker 1: Alright, everybody. Welcome back. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. Story and politico dot com. Very interesting. We are mentioned. You guys are mentioned, actually, all of us together. Ronna McDaniel is under siege, and her critics concede she's likely to survive. For now, we shall see. She is likely to survive for the time being. It goes on to say that the members of the one sixty eight in the RNC, they think she's doing a great job. I wanna read one of these here. So there's a guy, Jeff Kaufman, brave soul from Iowa. He thinks that Rana's doing amazing. Having worked with chairwoman Rana over the past two election cycles, I could not have asked for a better partner to ensure help us ensure historic up and down republican victories in Iowa. Without her support, Iowa and the Iowa caucus would not be the first in the nation. She has my full confidence as we head into the thick of caucus season. Okay. That that's that's not an unfair statement as far you have to you have to fight for your state. You have to fight for your state so you get you get the caucus, but is she gonna help us win the White House? And by the way, Jeff Kaufman. It's not because of Rana that Iowa has turned red. It's because of Trump. Trump has turned Iowa from battleground state to a deep red state. Period. End of story. Iowa was a fifty fifty state. Barack Hussein Obama won it in 02/2008, and Iowa is now deep red because of Trump, not because of Rana. But Jeff Kaufman, your argument is that we should have Rana remain the chair because you guys got the Iowa caucus first. Like, that's a really I'm I I get that's what you have to do. You should fight for that in Iowa. I believe by the way, believe Iowa should be first. That's a bad argument for why she should stay chair of the RNC. We're mentioned here, quote, Charlie Kirk urged Trump to push for a change in leadership. Quote, there's still time to course correct on many of the structural problems of the RNC, Kirk said in a statement, but we need to move Kirk and Turning Point have tried to unseat McDaniel in the latest RNC election, but we fell short. That is correct. We did fall short. In the aftermath of last week's elections, the simmering frustration with McDaniel has become far more pronounced. North Carolina GOP chair Michael Watley says, I was disappointed with a vague statement. What the RNC is trying to do is give everyone of these candidates an opportunity to communicate their message to the American people. Hey, Michael Watley. Why aren't you disappointed that we got our clock cleaned? Last Tuesday? There is a petition. It's firerana.com. It's brought to you by Vivek Ramaswamy. Laura Ingram kinda butted heads with Rana. Play cut 13, please. Speaker 24: Why should you retain your job given the track record of the party under your leadership? And to that, what do you say? Speaker 22: Well, first, I'm gonna continue to focus on Joe Biden and Democrats. And I think there was a moment missed during that debate by Vivek to talk about the fact that we still have 13 American hostages in Israel. The fact that for the first time ever in the history of either party, we had a Jewish co sponsor for a debate, and we are in very perilous times in our country. Speaker 1: No. No. I'm sorry. Enough gaslighting. Are you a winner or a loser? Enough of the fluff. Okay? And by the way, I'm so tired of this. I don't do messaging. I do messaging. I can't spend money on state races. I to get your act together. Okay? It's always it's always a dick it's like a escape hatch. It's like constantly hold on a sec. I can't pin this thing down. Play cut 14. Speaker 24: One of the things, Arana, that happened was, I I think in Virginia, people were wondering where the money was, whether they were gonna get some help from the RNC. And I I know at one point, you said that that you were not asked for money in Virginia, but a source, Republican source familiar with the Youngkin team in Virginia told the angle late tonight that that is false. And there, meaning your story keeps changing. Anyone who thinks Virginia Republicans wouldn't wanna help when we knew we'd be outspent isn't being serious. You know, Rana, they were outspent by $8,000,000. Speaker 22: Glenn Youngkin and did a phenomenal job and he raised a lot of money. A lot of people don't understand fundraising. I can't raise state dollars. I don't get unlimited convention and and state dollars. And these were state house and state senate races. The r n c gets federal committee. So, I mean, come on. Speaker 9: First of all, what what are you talking about? Speaker 1: You you I think there are segregated accounts, but is it not true that the r n c data is used by Republican candidates up and down the ballot? True or false? So and this is like a major slippery gaslighting thing. And when the great Larry O'Connor asked you about it, you said, oh, they didn't need the money. You didn't use that. It's either you can or you can't. Do you do messaging? We don't do messaging. It's the candidate's fault. Here's the essence. Losing. You gotta go. You gotta go. It's not personal. You're a sweet person. Go find something else to do. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. See you guys tomorrow.
VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 19, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Saved - September 20, 2025 at 9:18 AM

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@jakeshieldsajj And who is "Netanyahu".. https://t.co/C6O7c6gXug

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 introduces Mr. Benjamin Nattai and welcomes him into the afternoon, with thanks offered. The speaker notes that Mr. Nattai is a graduate of MIT, an Israeli, and a man who has written widely on this question before the house tonight.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mr. Benjamin Nattai. Mr. Nattai, welcome to the afternoon. Thank you. Mr. Nattai is a graduate of MIT. He is an Israeli, and he is a man who has written widely on this question before the house tonight.
VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 16, 2025 at 3:17 AM
Saved - September 16, 2025 at 7:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by the swift removal of free speech, exemplified by the silencing of Charlie. It raises questions about who defines "hate speech." I see a troubling trend where people cheer as their freedoms are stripped away. Recently, my video was taken down by TikTok, and I received a strike due to their new algorithm led by someone with ties to Israel, suggesting a concerning influence over the platform. It's important to remember that in America, all speech, no matter how offensive, is protected by the First Amendment. We must keep America free.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

There it is folks. Took them less than a week and they're already removing free speech. They're using the "silencing of Charlie" to silence YOU. Ironic... Who determines what "hate speech" is? They make sure to let you know it's "across the isle". If free speech is dead, the USA is dead. Amazing how easily you can get sheep to cheer while you slaughter and enslave them.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker distinguishes between free speech and hate speech, stating there is no place for hate speech, especially now after what happened to Charlie. They ask if law enforcement will increasingly target groups using hate speech and put cuffs on people, suggesting that action is better than inaction. They pledge: 'We will absolutely target you, go after you if you are targeting anyone with hate speech, anything, and that's across the aisle.' The message emphasizes cross-aisle enforcement against hate speech and signals a proactive stance toward addressing hate-motivated targeting. The remarks frame hate speech as something to be addressed by enforcement across political lines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's free speech and then there's hate speech. And there is no place, especially now, especially after what happened to Charlie in our society. Do you see more law enforcement going after these groups who are using hate speech and putting cuffs on people so we show them that some action is better than no action? We will absolutely target you, go after you if you are targeting anyone with hate speech, anything, and that's across the aisle.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/ObpKtDUfDl

@5149jamesli - James Li

This video has been removed by TikTok, with my account receiving a strike. With the “M2” algorithm that launched last night run by their “Hate Speech Chief”, who is a former IDF soldier and Israeli citizen — it’s clear Israel has officially taken full control of TikTok.

@5149jamesli - James Li

Since Charlie Kirk’s assassination: - 250 U.S. legislators are in Israel promoting the “50 states 1 Israel” project - House bans the Pentagon from boycotting Israel - $650M military aid to Israel - Bill proposed to revoke U.S. passports for Israel critics Hmm… 🤔

Video Transcript AI Summary
The segment centers on the "50 states, one Israel" delegation, noting that two hundred fifty American legislators will spend the coming week in Israel to experience it as it truly is. It references several U.S. moves connected to Israel, including the blocking of the Epstein files release, an amendment banning the Pentagon from boycotting Israel, and a proposed bill for Marco Rubio to revoke passports for critics of Israel. It also states that the House approved $650,000,000 for Israel's missile defense, and that Marco Rubio visited Israel. The piece adds that the delegation was serenaded with "Somewhere Over the Rainbow," described as a Project Monarch trigger for mind control, MK Ultra slaves, to activate them to do bidding against their will. It concludes by asking if this is all totally normal.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 50 states, one Israel. What is that? Well, the state of Israel just posted this on their Instagram a few hours ago, quote, the 50 states, one Israel delegation has landed in Israel. Two fifty American legislators will spend the coming week in Israel and experience it as it truly is. By doing this kind of thing, which I guess is required for all US government officials. Okay. Just want to point out to everybody that since Charlie Kirk was assassinated on September 10, the US government has blocked the Epstein files release, passed an amendment that banned the Pentagon from boycotting Israel, proposed a bill for Marco Rubio to revoke passports for critics of Israel. The House also approved $650,000,000 for Israel's missile defense, and as you just saw there, Marco Rubio visited Israel. And now, once again, there are two fifty legislators in Israel at the 50 states One Israel delegation being serenaded with Somewhere Over the Rainbow, a song known as a Project Monarch trigger for mind control, MK Ultra slaves, to activate them to do bidding against their will. And this is all totally normal, right?

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/oG1bIgDd6R

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment. Keep America free.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@HornStros3 yep

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@CredibleUFO ☝️🏻

VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 15, 2025 at 5:18 AM
Saved - September 15, 2025 at 10:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe there’s substantial evidence in a recent clip that warrants a serious investigation into potential Israeli connections to Charlie Kirk's death. Kirk, who was pro-Israel, criticized certain factions within the Israeli government for their actions on 10/7 and accused them of serious misconduct. He openly called Israel's actions in Gaza "ethnic cleansing" and mentioned texting senior IDF officials. His influence and connections could pose a threat to those he criticized, suggesting that a thorough examination of these ties is necessary.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

There's enough evidence in this one clip to warrant a serious investigation into israeli connections to Charlie Kirk's death. The problem Charlie Kirk presents for Netanyahu and the israeli government is that he's pro-israel and he's calling out "traitors" and "bad factions" within the israeli government for standing down on 10/7, orchestrating blackmail and pedophilia rings, tying Epstein to mossad and frequently speaking out against broader war efforts, especially against Iran. He definitively calls israel’s actions in Gaza "ethnic cleansing." Here @ 2:36, Charlie clearly states: "I was texting with some senior people in the IDF." — PBD Podcast | 10/12/23 Were he someone they could call an antisemite or accuse of being anti-israel, he wouldn’t be a significant threat. Him being considered pro israel by his millions of followers and calling out traitors in the israeli government would be a significant threat to the people he's referencing. Considering that Charlie was involved with "senior IDF" people, all the statements he's made against the "bad factions" in the israeli government and the fact that he had visited israel many times; any serious administration would look into this connection. For all they know, Charlie was working with a group to expose or move against the bad faction he references in this clip. — PBD Podcast | 10/12/23 Highlights

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 says the Gaza crisis raises motive questions and a possible 'stand down order'—six hours or more—while noting Israel is a fortress with a surveilled border. He recalls Israel’s nine months of near civil war over Netanyahu’s judicial overhaul, and that Netanyahu now has an emergency government. He suggests internal betrayal or 'bad agents' within the government or IDF whispers, arguing 'this is the closest thing to the Holocaust that any of us have lived through.' He warns the hard-right government has a mandate to 'go seek justice and revenge' and may attempt to 'ethnically cleanse Gaza' of '2,500,000 people.' He states, 'The answer is it shouldn't be a top priority to the American government because we have so many problems here to execute a CIA coup d'etat in another country.' He cautions against a wider war—'bombing Iranian oil depots' could draw in Russia and China, risking escalation, and notes past wars like the Six Day War and Yom Kippur War as context.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I I just have way too many questions that makes me think about what the motives are. And if we go dark, I'll put all those things out there. Yeah. How did how did these guys not know this was taking place? Speaker 1: So I've been in Israel many times. The whole country is a fortress. When I first heard this story, I still had the same gut instinct that I did initially. I find this very hard to believe. I've been to that Gaza border. You you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with an AR 15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier. Right? The whole country is surveilled. And so so let me let me just kinda go through this. We don't talk about Israeli politics very often, and most Americans don't know this. The last nine months, Israel was on the brink of civil war. It's not an exaggeration. This judicial stuff, there were there were hundreds of thousands of Israelis taking to the streets because Bibi Netanyahu was basically redefining the Israeli constitution. That's not an exaggeration. Right? He said the judicial branch has too much power. There were protests planned this week against Netanyahu where they anticipated tens of thousands of people to take to the streets. That's all gone, Patrick. Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead. I'm not I'm not willing to say to go so far that saying that Netanyahu knew or there was intelligence here, but I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hours? I don't believe it. Israel's the side of New Jersey. When I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it's forty five minutes. Wow. Six hours. They're livestreaming the killing of Jews. Was did somebody in the government say stand down? That is a legitimate non conspiracy question. The whole country is the IDF. The whole country is. Yep. And you're trying to tell me that they're going to concerts and kibbutzes and schools and by reports, six hours. Let's say it's three hours. That's suspect. Go ahead, Rob. Speaker 2: It's also not like a right wing reporting. This is from the New York Times. The long wait for help as massacre unfolds in Israel. I can't think of a more liberal news outlet than the New Speaker 1: York Times. And and by the way, I I'm actually very pro Israel. So let me be very I mean Mhmm. So I'm not exactly I think we all are. No. No. I just wanna make sure my position is clear here. But I would so Patrick, there are other explanations. It's possible that the Netanyahu government was double crossed by bad agents. Okay? That's dark, but it's not as dark as what we're talking about. Okay? Another aspect is that Netanyahu might have traitors in his government, like legitimate traitors that have infiltrated. I was texting with some senior people in the IDF and they said, Charlie, can't say too much, but let's just say the same problem you have with the left in America we have here in Israel. So there's something to think Just something to think about, right? Is that maybe there are some people within those intel agencies that aren't as sympathetic. Or maybe, Patrick, maybe they might have gotten a tip, they might have gotten whispers, but no one thought it would be 1,200 Jews dead. That's a potential, right? Because here's the essence of it. The essence is this: this is the closest thing to the Holocaust that any of us have lived through. But the fact is now Bibi and the Israeli hard right government has a mandate I gotta be careful the way I say this to they're gonna try to ethnically cleanse Gaza. I mean, that's and I don't use that term lightly. Okay? They're talking about basically removing 2,500,000 people from there. Okay? And honestly, they have a mandate to go seek justice and revenge. They do. This idea that they need to have a truce or a peace treaty, that's morally crap after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets. But there are some serious questions here, Patrick. And let me tell you, my pattern recognition over the last five years has become pretty sharp. COVID, Maui fires, you know, Epstein. When I see a story and it doesn't click, our guts are usually right. I just want to be very sorry to interrupt. I'm saying that's what they're going to be accused of. But if there are some people in public life in Israel that Patrick, what did your pilot guy say? I want only Jews in Israel. Right? Okay. That is a form of ethnically cleansing because 20% of Israel is Correct. Mean, look, here so let me also make sure I criticize both sides. Okay? So I'm gonna criticize the people that, you know, do the paragliding and it's sick. Lindsey Graham is an irresponsible lawmaker for what he's saying. Bombing Iranian oil depots? This thing could get wildly out of control very, very quickly. The last thing America needs is a kinetic war against Iran, an 87,000,000 person country that has a pretty fierce fighting spirit, a country at five times the size of Iraq, five times the size of Iraq. We're gonna go start bombing oil depots. Yeah. That could get Russia further involved, China involved. Yeah. Look. The quote, unquote, Armageddon situation is that for Israel, the Armageddon situation is that they overreact so much that they lose their Arab neutrality. Right now, they have neutrality with Egypt. If they overreact, they could lose that. They have warm conversations. I won't say a peace deal yet with Saudi Arabia. They could lose that. Jordan plays ball because America demands they play ball. They could lose that. Syria, Bashar al Assad, he acts as if it doesn't exist, but that could change in a moment's notice. Right? Lebanon via Hezbollah is already there. They could be all of a sudden dealing with a 15 country invasion of Israel. Speaker 0: Can they handle that? Speaker 1: They have in the past. I mean, the the Six Day War, the Yom Kippur War. The Yom Kippur War, for example, they were invaded from every direction. At the the Balfour declaration, when they were came a country in 1948, every Arab country declared war on them. Yeah. And and they were they almost lost the country. And to their credit, they held it off, and they earned the right to be Israel. I The women have no rights The answer is it shouldn't be a top priority to the American government because we have so many problems here to execute a CIA coup d'etat in another country. You have to put sanctions on. You have to put them in check. You have to try to, in my personal opinion, allow Israel to seek justice. At the same time, you cannot allow this to turn into a regional broader war. You know why? Because the adult America is gonna have to come clean it up. That's why. If we allow if we just kinda say, oh, it doesn't this thing turns into a regional conflict, we're gonna have more troops on the ground, and we're gonna have to go clean up this mess, as Trump calls it, in the region of sand and death while our own country is disintegrating and collapsing.
VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 14, 2025 at 2:33 AM
Saved - September 15, 2025 at 12:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been following the recent developments surrounding Charlie Kirk and his connections to Epstein and Israel. Steve Bannon's recent rants highlight the need for serious investigations into these ties, especially with the Epstein files. There are concerns about Kirk's security during events, particularly after a shooting incident, raising questions about their effectiveness. Despite claims of stepping back from discussing Epstein, Kirk continues to reference it, suggesting pressure from the Trump administration. Additionally, a pro-Israel subdomain was removed from TPUSA's website, indicating possible shifts in Kirk's stance.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk Show | Jul 11, 2025 "Steve Bannon Goes On EPIC Ultra MAGA Rant on Epstein & Deep State" Guys...it doesn't get anymore obvious than this. I'm putting together all the pieces but stuff like this is literally everywhere. For the past 6 months or more Charlie has been pushing for the release of the Epstein files while directly tying it to mossad. If these connections aren't taken seriously and investigated... That should be all the confirmation you need. Steve Bannon has been talking about running for president recently. Keep your eye on Bannon. I have a feeling he's next. Get to it and spread it before it's deleted. Go to YT and Kirk's channel and filter Epstein. Spread everything.

Video Transcript AI Summary
At the Tampa Summit, Bannon urges 'two or three action steps by Sunday afternoon' to appoint a special prosecutor to 'assist and augment president Trump' and save his presidency. He asks, 'Who governs this country? The American people or the deep state?' and calls for Tampa resolves. He backs Tom Fenton as prosecutor, 'not a lawyer' but able to 'hire all the lawyers,' to 'unseal all the sealed evidence' and 'collect all the other evidence' from every agency. The second mandate would 'impanel a federal criminal grand jury' to examine 'the intelligence agencies and the interconnectivity with foreign governments, whether it's British government and MI six, the Saudi government and Saudi intelligence, Mossad and Shin Ben and the Israeli government and the CIA.' He cites 'the crimes against children' and 'the trafficking of children.' Congress must confirm; Matt Gaetz suggested. If not, 'the country will be over.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you take time to understand how God has consistently blessed America, pouring his grace and mercy on us over and over again, it will give you hope for the days ahead. We cannot afford to forget our past, good and bad, or we will forfeit the best opportunities of our future. God Bless America Again. This book will sharpen your perspective on what it means to bring God's truth into our nation today. Alan Jackson Ministries is working hard to bring back biblical truth back into our culture. Go to alenjackson.com/charlie for free shipping on God Bless America. Again, that's Alan Jackson, allenjackson.com/charlie. I love what I learned from Alan Jackson, and you will too. Welcome, everybody. We are here at the Student Action Summit in Tampa, Florida, and look at this crowd that we have here. Look at this. That's as good as it gets. We are here with Stephen K. Bannon. Steve, you've just been yelling for the last two hours. You you're pretty fired up about this Epstein thing. I I just got a call from someone in Washington. Let's not say his name. But he was like, wait. Speaker 1: A very dialed in guy. Super dialed in. Really super dialed Speaker 0: in. He's like, wait. Is this Epstein thing kinda big? I thought it's over. And Speaker 1: so first of all They think it's over because the media had eight minutes of president Trump as 20 questions and didn't mention it once. So even president Trump thinks it's over. Speaker 0: And so, Steve, what is your recommendation, your suggestion on how to fix this? Speaker 1: There's only one way to fix this. We have to come out of Tampa just like the Patriots did on doing like the Boston resolves. We have to come out with the Tampa resolves. Two or three action steps by Sunday afternoon. We're all committed to, all of us, to say this must happen, and I think it's special prosecutor ever. But we have to say no more nothing. We have to go forward with this. And the reason we're going forward with this, we're there to assist and augment president Trump, to help save president Trump's presidency because they are coming for another coup. You can see it happening. Just like the dark clouds were around Kennedy. Right? They they moved in and moved in and moved in. They assassinated him in in in Vietnam, and then they blew his head off in the middle of the day in in Dallas, Texas with a patsy named Lee Harvey Oswald that we find out sixty two years later was on the payroll of the CIA as they looked your parents in the eye and lied to them for sixty years. They're gonna lie about everything today and hope that seventy years from now nobody will care about it. Do you care about it? Yeah. If we don't come out of here united with Turning Point, as powerful as Turning Point is, if we don't come out of here and say, no more, more, we must have this because if we don't take down the deep state, we're gonna lose the entire country, and they think they're winning. They're laughing at us right now. They're laughing at you. They're mocking you. This is the Epstein is some the question's very simple. Who governs this country? The American people or the deep state? Do do they have do they have the consent of the governor on what they're doing right now? I hear a lot of talk. Speaker 0: Now now Speaker 1: see some action. Speaker 0: Now now, Steve, so special prosecutor, who would you recommend, and what does that scope look like? Because special prosecutors can be kind of a dead end sometimes. Speaker 1: It can't be. My recommendation right now would it be Tom Fenton. Tom Fenton is not a lawyer. He can hire all the lawyers. Is Tom Fenton have credibility with everybody? If Tom quit and Fitten looks you in the eye after everything he's gone through and fought for and said, here's what it is. Would you believe Tom Fitten? Would you believe Tom Fitten will release all the documents? It's very simple. You name Tom Fitten a special prosecutor. He brings in a team of actual prosecutors. You go to the court, and the first thing you do is petition the court to unseal all the sealed evidence. Right? Yeah. Number two is you take collect all the other evidence, not just from the FBI and the justice department, from every agency in our government, and you put it forward. Right? By the way, there may be some victim issues here. It just that's gonna have to be dealt with. You're gonna have to deal it. Do you guys wanna see everything or just some things? Yeah. Everything. You wanna see everything? Yeah. And you're prepared to take the accountability if that happens? Yeah. Are you? Yeah. You? Yeah. You gotta do a gut check. That's why we need these resolves this weekend. You do that. Also, the special prosecutor has a second mandate, and that is to be able to impanel a federal criminal grand jury that he can then bring all the evidence he finds if he finds it to the grand jury about the intelligence agencies and the interconnectivity with foreign governments, whether it's British government and MI six, the Saudi government and Saudi intelligence, Mossad and Shin Ben and the Israeli government and the CIA and all the other 17, intelligence apparatuses that you're paying for. He must get to that to see if there's any interconnectivity and who actually governs the American people. Speaker 0: So so, Steve, for people that were watching in the Western Washington press court, in the White House, let's say, they say, why do people care about this so much? Explain it. Bring us into the MAGA mind. Why let's just pan the audience. Raise your hand if the Epstein thing is very important to you. Raise your hand. Can we just show that pan shot really quick, guys? Keep your hands Speaker 1: up. It's a 100%. Speaker 0: Every hand goes up. Some people have two hands up. Speaker 1: It's Speaker 0: 100 but, Steve, why is it very important? This is by the way, this is ultra MAGA 10.2 o. MAGA. It's it's ultra MAGA as it gets. Speaker 1: Number one, it's the crimes against children. Right? The trafficking of children. But number two, it's what that trafficking was used for. Right? They need they have fought this from day one, and this is president Trump's hardest core base. And the only way this goes away, if these people, not just an answer, if they don't see a process that they can buy into, that they think are gonna treat them like adults and get the information to them, you know what they're gonna say? I'm out. I'm out. And if they're out, there is no MAGA movement going forward. Why do you think the press corps didn't answer my question? They hate you. They hate MAGA. They hate the power you have over Washington DC. That's where they're gonna roll over. They want this to go away. They know why because they know that you'll get just, okay, I'm gonna go away too. That's why there's not all the great stuff, the deportations, the tariffs, the economic program. This is why this is so important. And one of the tales you're gonna have, it's what's happening in Ukraine and what's happening in The Middle East. The three most powerful institutions in Washington DC, the Federal Reserve, the Central Intelligence Agency and CENCOM. Right? You've got the money in the brains, you've got the you got the money, you've got the brains, you got the muscle. All three of those must be brought to heel by this audience. The way we bring it to heel is you use Epstein is the tool to do it. We must use that tool. We must use it today. If we don't do it, let's just give up and go play. Let's just hang out. Right? We'll have a concert here for two days and a picnic. Speaker 0: We're not doing that. That's not why we're here. So so Steve, walk us through the mechanics. Can the president appoint a special prosecutor without congress? Speaker 1: He has to get by the way, the way because we use it, a prosecutor has to be the special prosecutor has to be confirmed by congress. But that's what we got the votes to do that. You don't need 60 you it's 51 votes. We control that. You just tell the Republican Party. We basically get online every night and bombard their offices with emails or text messages saying you must do this. Tom Fenton's a known guy. He can get confirmed. Speaker 0: Or Matt Gaetz. Speaker 1: Matt Gaetz would be the best. Speaker 0: How about Matt Gaetz? Would people like Matt Gaetz? Speaker 1: Matt Gaetz is amazing. Speaker 0: That would be a no brainer. Right? Speaker 1: I I think I think what you do I can't focus. I get too broad. I I think I think what you do is a Fenton, a special prosecutor, maybe Matt Gaetz's attorney general. Speaker 0: Yeah. If we I don't think that'll happen with with senate confirmation. But, Steven, closing your Speaker 1: Hold it. There's everybody there's not anybody if the process showed us with Hagsett and Bobby Kennedy and Tulsi, if you fix bayonets, there's nobody we can't get confirmed. Right? You put the fear of God in Joni Ernst. You put the fear of God in Tom Tillis. You put the fear of God in anybody. We can get him confirmed. Maybe Gates is better at holding the ball pin but or Gates for Fenton. He'll be ready for Speaker 0: a line change. I think Gates is right because there will be a line change at some point. Steve, in closing, going into the midterms and beyond, if the anger that I am getting from the audience on Epstein continues, what will that mean politically? Speaker 1: It'll be over, the country will be over and half of you people will be in prison. The other half will be bankrupt. That's why Speaker 0: it's all That's how important you think this is. Speaker 1: This is nothing more important. By the way, tonight at right after the 05:00 show, I'm a do a meet and greet with all of you. So I appreciate it. Speaker 0: God bless. Thank you. Speaker 1: Sure. Is Charlie Kirk the best? Is this guy the greatest warrior we got? Love you guys.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/zCr1z8lw4O

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

👀Charlie Kirk's “Security” and Their Ties to Israel (I'm adding “NOT SUICIDAL” to my bio) Charlie Kirk's private security was handled by a detail that sometimes included former Secret Service agents and U.S. Marines. The security team, contracted by his organization Turning Point USA, was led by former FBI agent Greg Shaffer. The internet (and possibly Shaffer himself) is now distancing him from Kirk’s security. If you search for a connection, it will tell you that Shaffer Security Group stopped working with Kirk in 2022. Despite the supposed security expertise, this is Shaffer's comment about the Kirk shooting: “We typically anticipated close-range threats...” There is no proof of any disconnection. A single AP article making that claim yesterday is the only source. You can clearly see that Charlie had the same security personnel in 2022 that he did at the shooting. The people in charge of Kirk’s security essentially did nothing to secure the area or inspect rooftops prior to or during the event, despite the fact that it would have been a simple four-man job that could have included cameras for the event. After the shooting, the crime scene was not secured, and they allowed the staff to simply pack up the area. 🧵 @HarrisonHSmith @IanCarrollShow

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/PWtN3q9Nk6

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

September 10th Recap | While You Were Distracted Further evidence against israel. 🕕 18:23 UTC / 1:23 PM CDT — Charlie Kirk event. 🕙 22:17 UTC / 5:17 PM CDT — Senate Republicans block release of Jeffrey Epstein–related documents. Chuck Schumer — Self proclaimed "guardian of israel". Chuck Schumer, as Senate Majority Leader, has been a key figure in blocking or advancing legislation related to Israel and other foreign policy issues in the Senate. 🧵

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/6bdAI7P1WE

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵👀 https://t.co/3fEnac64q8

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/6gk6UzkNDc

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

July 15, 2025 | Charlie Kirk falls in line, says "I'm done talking about Epstein" for time being. The Plot Thickens Two days after the TPUSA event with Megyn Kelly and the show with Steve Bannon, Charlie got the call from the Trump admin to drop the subject. Charlie did not, despite saying he was done talking about it. Only 10 days ago he was still posting videos about the Epstein files and I've found him bringing it up at least 5 Times since then. He got the call after the event with Steve Bannon in July but chose to post the video 11 days ago tying Epstein to mossad and calling out the Trump admin for being complicit with the deep state if they don't investigate it. Around the same time Charlie and Steve did their event Bannon was floating the idea of running for president in 2028. Link in 🧵 (It's from the lib media but it's still worth watching).

Video Transcript AI Summary
White House says the president's team would continue to work in, 'lockstep.' A feud involving Bondi, Patel, and Bongino. Bongino was back at work after Friday off and rumors he would quit. Trump told reporters he spoke to Bongino earlier and thought Bongino was, 'in good shape' in his current position. Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk says he's, 'done with the matter,' while Laura Ingraham scolds other influencers for still discussing it. president marked the one year anniversary of the day he almost lost his life as Republicans like Marjorie Taylor Greene call it, 'a full reversal on what was all said beforehand, and people are just not willing to accept it,' and Nick Fuentes says, 'MAGA is dead' blaming Democrats for fabricating the Epstein files. Senator John Kennedy urged answers from the justice department; House Republicans voted against a Democrat-backed amendment to release Epstein files; Ro Khanna pushing.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The show that knows there is never a dull moment on the New York City subway. Man, look at that flooding. We're gonna get the forecast in just a few minutes. For now, I'm Ali Vitale on this Tuesday, July 15, and we'll start with the news. The Trump administration is trying to portray a united front as the president continues to face the threat of revolt from his MAGA base over the Jeffrey Epstein files. It comes after telling his supporters to not waste any more time or energy on the deceased convicted sex offender. The White House released this statement yesterday declaring that the president's entire team would continue to work in, quote, lockstep. That entire team piece is important because it comes despite the reported feud involving attorney general Pam Bondi, FBI director Kash Patel, and deputy FBI director Dan Bongino. What's more, Bongino was reportedly back at work yesterday according to CNN after he took Friday off and was rumored to have threatened to quit. CNN also reports Bongino's long term future is still uncertain at this point. Additionally, president Trump told reporters on Sunday he spoke to Bongino earlier that morning and thought Bongino was, quote, in good shape in his current position. We'll see about that, but it comes as some high profile Trump loyalists who voiced concerns over the lack of transparency regarding the Epstein files are now apparently heeding the president's orders and moving on. Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, who voiced his concern over the Epstein files a mere forty eight hours ago at the Student Action Summit in Florida, now says he's, quote, done with the matter. Speaker 1: Honestly, I'm done talking about Epstein for the time being. I'm gonna trust my friends in the administration. I'm gonna trust my friends in the government to do what needs to be done, solve it, balls in their hands. I've said plenty this last weekend. Speaker 0: Make some noise if you care about the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Speaker 1: Raise your hand if it matters a lot to you. Raise your hand. So every hand of 7,000 people. Everybody cares. It I think A lot. I said a lot. Every hand. Speaker 0: He did have a lot to say this weekend, but now he's trusting his friends in the government. Fox News host Laura Ingram, who also raised raised questions about the Epstein investigation over the weekend, is now actually scolding other conservative influencers for still discussing it as if she hadn't done so herself. Speaker 2: Now as conservative influencers were eating their own about stein, the president was stealing the show on the one year anniversary of the day he almost lost his life. He made a triumphant appearance at a global sporting event. Meanwhile, Democrats keep shooting in their own goal, stumbling from one embarrassment to the next. How many of you are satisfied you can you can clap. Satisfied with the results of the Epstein investigation. Clap. Okay. I told you to clap. You guys aren't listening. I'm not gonna grade you on a curve. So I was gonna get to that. How many of you are not satisfied with the results of the investigation? Speaker 0: Things change quick. And despite several Trump loyalists now changing their tune and falling in line, there are still some defectors that remain, at least for now. Among them, Republican congressman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, who criticized the Trump administration's handling of this case, told The New York Times, quote, it's definitely a full reversal on what was all said beforehand, and people are just not willing to accept it. Right wing influencer, Nick Fuentes, went so far as to say MAGA is dead in response to president Trump's posts, blaming Democrats for fabricating the Epstein files. Fuentes wrote on social media, quote, so now Trump is claiming the Epstein files are a Democrat hoax? LOL. And then there's Republican senator John Kennedy of Louisiana who said this to NBC News yesterday. Speaker 3: Mister Epstein was a sex trafficker. He was a sex trafficker of young women, some of whom were minors. I think it's reasonable for the American people to ask, who he sexed, trafficked these young women to, if anybody besides himself. And if there were others involved, why they haven't been prosecuted. That's a perfectly understandable question. And I think the justice department is going to have to answer it. Speaker 0: Overnight, House Republicans voted against a Democrat backed amendment that would force the justice department to release the Epstein files in full. The house rules committee voted against attaching that amendment to a cryptocurrency bill. Congressman Ralph Norman of South Carolina was actually the only Republican on that committee who actually voted in favor of it. The measure would have forced US attorney general Pam Bondi to publish all documents related to Epstein on a publicly accessible website within thirty days of it being enacted. Democrats say they expected the amendment to fail, but they plan to take advantage of Trump's turn to releasing the documents by driving a wedge between him and his base. They're gonna keep introducing that amendment or that bill, at least according to Ro Khanna, who's pushing it.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/w1Nl4NKn2Q

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk | Curiouser & Curiouser Around the same time frame (July) that the Megyn Kelly, Steve Bannon events happened a subdomain of TPUSA's website (israel.) was removed from the site. This page can still be seen on Wayback Machine. Charlie Kirk(or someone with the authority)removed the subdomain of the TPUSA website that was essentially Charlie backing us israel and explaining why he loves israel. Check it out yourself @waybackmachine

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/cOFlQXK14Q

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk Assassination Master Thread The Evidence (DEEP THREAD🧵ONGOING)

Video Transcript AI Summary
"If Bibi Netanyahu, if he does something I don't like and if I criticize it, am I, like, a bad Christian? Absolutely not." "What I find strange is that we're able to criticize the American government sometimes in the Christian world with more freedom than the Israeli government." "To be pro Israel means you believe in the nation of Israel Mhmm. Not necessarily the government of Israel." "When you when Joe Biden was president, you and I were what we loved America, but we detested our government." "If they challenge a foreign government, which is what happens so often. Right. Like you're a bad Christian if you have a question about a foreign government." "Right. That creates backlash that I don't think people understand."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Bibi Netanyahu, if he does something I don't like and if I criticize it, am I, like, a bad Christian? Absolutely not. What I find strange is that we're able to criticize the American government sometimes in the Christian world with more freedom than the Israeli government. To be pro Israel means you believe in the nation of Israel Mhmm. Not necessarily the government of Israel. When you when Joe Biden was president, you and I were what we loved America, but we detested our government. And those two those two things beautifully coexisted. Yeah. You never you never once said, hey, I'm I'm out on America. On America's right. Exactly. And what they don't want is they don't wanna be called bad Christians Mhmm. If they challenge a foreign government, which is what happens so often. Right. Like you're a bad Christian if you have a question about a foreign government. Right. That creates backlash that I don't think people understand.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@Lana99934515814 TY

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@DogTrainDavid Go back to sleep sheep.

VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 14, 2025 at 7:42 AM
Saved - September 14, 2025 at 11:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been following the unfolding situation surrounding Charlie Kirk, especially after his recent assassination attempt. It seems there are numerous theories about why he was targeted, with some suggesting he had turned against Israel or was considering a presidential run. There's also a focus on his push for the release of Epstein files and connections to Mossad. Additionally, discussions about his security detail and alleged warnings before the shooting have surfaced. The narrative around his past comments on Israel and antisemitism is being actively reshaped, raising questions about political loyalty and influence.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk Assassination Master Thread The Evidence (DEEP THREAD🧵ONGOING)

Video Transcript AI Summary
"If Bibi Netanyahu, if he does something I don't like and if I criticize it, am I, like, a bad Christian? Absolutely not." "What I find strange is that we're able to criticize the American government sometimes in the Christian world with more freedom than the Israeli government." "To be pro Israel means you believe in the nation of Israel Mhmm. Not necessarily the government of Israel." "When you when Joe Biden was president, you and I were what we loved America, but we detested our government." "You never you never once said, hey, I'm I'm out on America. On America's right." "And what they don't want is they don't wanna be called bad Christians Mhmm." "If they challenge a foreign government, which is what happens so often. Right. Like you're a bad Christian if you have a question about a foreign government."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Bibi Netanyahu, if he does something I don't like and if I criticize it, am I, like, a bad Christian? Absolutely not. What I find strange is that we're able to criticize the American government sometimes in the Christian world with more freedom than the Israeli government. To be pro Israel means you believe in the nation of Israel Mhmm. Not necessarily the government of Israel. When you when Joe Biden was president, you and I were what we loved America, but we detested our government. And those two those two things beautifully coexisted. Yeah. You never you never once said, hey, I'm I'm out on America. On America's right. Exactly. And what they don't want is they don't wanna be called bad Christians Mhmm. If they challenge a foreign government, which is what happens so often. Right. Like you're a bad Christian if you have a question about a foreign government. Right. That creates backlash that I don't think people understand.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵This was the breaking thread. https://t.co/i2ZstxjqOy

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Why was Charlie Kirk shot? 👇🏻 Watch this. This was a month ago. Really watch it. If Charlie turned on israel...they'd be fucked. @HarrisonHSmith called it. https://t.co/bhgUEiIcpi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Megan Kelly and Charlie Kirk frame themselves as ardent defenders of Israel, urging caution against conflating critique with anti-Semitism. They argue that some in the pro-Israel camp punish mild pushback, harming credibility as they face online harassment and accusations of anti-Semitism, including Epstein/Mossad speculation. They cite a culture of hyperparanoia and insist they are Americans first. Megan recalls a Piers Morgan segment: she said 'the photos of the starving children out of Gaza' and 'they're manipulated, and they're masters of propaganda' and 'it's Hamas,' and that she is skeptical of taking those images at face value. They warn Israel risks losing standing with allies as support shifts: 'GOP in June 2024, 76%. Now 71%'; 'Dems in October 2023, 36%. Now it's at eight'; 'Independents ...(47%). Now it's 25%.' They defend hosting diverse voices—'you have no right to come on this show and demand a debate with me'.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You and I are both supporters of Israel, and Yeah. Have defended Israel since the beginning of this conflict, and and spoken out about the anti Semitism that has erupted on these college campuses many, many, many, many times. And something's happening though with this whole debate that is really bothering me, and I wonder if you're feeling it too. So I I mean, I genuinely believe you'd be hard pressed to find somebody in the public eye who's been as outspoken a defender of not every move Israel's taken in the war, but of Israel's right to defend itself and of the the just backward awfulness that we've been seeing on college campuses and the backlash against American Jews, than yours truly. I mean, I have been at the pointy end of the spear on this. And I Speaker 1: I completely agree with that. Speaker 0: And I it was all heartfelt, and it remains heartfelt. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: However, however, I my contention here is that some in the pro Israel camp are so knee jerk about calling you anti Semitic or getting deeply offended if you say anything that doesn't align with their narrative, that it undermines their own cause. And I have to tell you, I find it very irritating, because I do feel like some of us have earned the right to have some credibility on the subject of Israel and don't wanna be called those names when we have some mild pushback on some of the overreaches, whether it's, you know, whether they're winning or losing the propaganda war right now. And my contention is they've begun to lose it. And I realize it's propaganda coming at us from Hamas, but they their their numbers have turned. Here in America, they've turned, not so much with Republicans, a little bit with Republicans, but but completely with the Democrat party and with independents. They they have shifted mightily from at least double digits highs to single digit lows now with it with when it comes to approval. And also with respect to you and I speculated about this at the Turning Point event, whether the possibility of Jeffrey Epstein possibly being a Mossad agent or asset or affiliated with, that's been turned around on me too to you must be anti Semitic. What the hell? That's such bullshit. I agree. The same people who say, you can criticize Israel. That's fine. We won't call you anti Semitic if you criticize Israel. Turn around immediately and say, you're anti Semitic for even raising that. I completely reject that, and I raise this as a pushback against my friends on that particular strain of the aisle to watch it because you don't wanna alienate people who are openly your friends by going nuts in your crackdowns on mild pushback on anything related to Israel. Now you take it. Speaker 1: I'm so I'm I'm so glad you brought this up. And I would second that. Megan, I think I have a bulletproof resume showing my defense of Israel both on campus, on social media, to to great, you know, let's just say, mockery and scorn at times where I because I believe it. Right? I I believe in the scriptural land rights given to Israel. I believe in fulfillment of prophecy. And again, I'm not a theologian, but I'm a Christian. My life was changed in Israel. The spiritual energy is so amazing there. I I want them to win. I've said that repeatedly. Same. And however, Megan, you're hitting on something very potent and important. Now let me first say, I don't wanna judge an entire group because there's been many people in the Paris Real world that have been very sweet, very kind, very nuanced, very Charlie. You know, you're with us. You don't have to agree all the time. However, and I and I will say this, the behavior by a lot, both privately and publicly, are pushing people like you and me away. Not like we're gonna be pro Hamas. Not like we're gonna but we're like, honestly, the way you are treating me is so repulsive. I have text messages, Megan, calling me an anti Semite. Am learning biblical Hebrew and writing a book on the Shabbat. I honor the Shabbat, literally the Jewish Sabbath. I visit Israel and fight for it. And there's another article out in the Times of Israel today. I could read it on air. I was just reading before I got on. Charlie, what are you doing? Like, why are you what am I doing? I'm sorry. Like, let's just take a step back here. Like, I'm an American citizen. Yes. I want Israel to win. Yes. I'm a Christian. But, like, the sum of the mess and you saw I mean, you've seen how I've been treated, Megan, by some, not all, by some. Speaker 0: No. It's very irritating. It's it's been so unfair. They they were coming after you after Turning Point for among other things. They had Dave Smith there. Dave Smith isn't allowed to criticize Israel. You had both sides. The the Israeli side was over to represent. Speaker 1: Though. No. You're not allowed to. It's even worse than that. Again, I would just wanna repeat for the fifth time. I love Israel. I want Israel to win. But my moral character is now being put into question, Megan. Not my decisions. Not like, hey. Are you doing this? Is it smart or is it dumb? But no. I am a bad person if I do this. And it's a I I could go I mean, you saw it, Megan. It was trending on Twitter. Thousands of tweets and text messages. And if I were to be charitable and generous, I will say the people that are attacking me are in a hyperparanoid state because they're at war, and war tends to make things black and white, and you're a hammer looking for a nail. So I'm trying to be charitable, Megan. Literally, I'm trying to cut as much slack as I can. Right? They go, okay. What would it be like if all of a sudden I'm starting to see a pattern of behavior similar to what my grandparents saw in nineteen thirties Germany online? How would I behave? So that's like my charitable kind of over compensation spirit. At the same time, I'm like, but you're it's it's not defensible to be dumb. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. So And it's offensive. It's offensive to those of us who have been out there defending them in many instances against critics on our own side. And now you have a couple of comments like, well, what about this? Well, has it gone on too long? Like, is it time to wrap it up? And the thing about Epstein is just so bizarre. I don't know who he was an agent for. It might have been Israel or an asset, or it might have been nobody. But we're allowed to speculate about that. It's like just some rule. You can't go there when it comes to Israel. Speaker 1: Well, you and I believe that we're Americans and Americans first, period. End of story. We are citizens of this nation. Okay? That's Israel, we have funded. We have supported. And they're up against a sea of Islamic totalitarianism, and we should be cheering for them. Right? Because they're up against barbarians and and monsters, and we want them to win. However, here is Megan Kelly and Charlie Kirk combined, probably 30,000,000 social media followers, like, pretty right? And you and I have been holding this down, and you you probably get the negative, oh, you're just shilling for Israel. I'm like, okay. I'm gonna do what's right regardless of the feedback. Right? But then all of a sudden, like, I host a person that I I moderate the debate of, mind you. Right? And I give equal time to Josh Hammer, equal time to a pro Israel advocate, and my moral character is being put into question. And so I I just I think it's a hyper paranoid, like, we're just gonna try to we're we're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice, but it goes to the point where if for example, if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan? It Speaker 0: it's so wrong headed. I'll tell you, this for me so I got some blowback after saying Mossad possibilities with Epstein, a comment behind which I stand. I mean, I and I've, of course, reported what Alan Dershowitz has said as his lawyer. He says, think he would have told me. He didn't say he had any of those connections. I hear all that. That doesn't mean it's not true. I think all these things should be explored. It's one of the many things that should be explored around Epstein. But saying that and also saying he might be a US asset, etcetera, doesn't make you anti Semitic. That's fucking crazy. And then we get to last week I go on Piers Piers Morgan. Right? So I go on Piers Morgan last week. And I don't talk about Israel a lot on this show. I just like covering the day to day of a conflict like this is not my thing. It's not what we do here at the We Megan Kelly haven't done it for Ukraine. We haven't done it for Israel. We haven't done it for a lot of conflicts, but we'll talk about it when big things happen. So Piers talks about it a lot. Piers asked me was a very interesting kind of culture study. So he asked me about the photos of the starving children out of Gaza. And I said a couple of things, both of which got a fair amount of pickup. Alright. So first, this is what I said about the photos. Listen to Sat 10. Well, I'm always reluctant to put too much stock in the images coming out of Gaza, that that phrase, because they're manipulated, and they're masters of propaganda, and they're fine having their own children starve just as long as they can put them on camera and show them off to the world. That that's Hamas, and frankly, it's a lot of Palestinians, so I'm very skeptical of taking those images at face value and saying it's Israel's fault. Okay. So that clip gets circulating Speaker 1: I'm with you on that. Speaker 0: A million times by my Israeli friends and my Jewish friends online. Like, go, Megan. Yeah. Okay. Great. Cool. Cool. Cool. Yeah. She's right on. Look at her you know, speak truth to peers. And then peers released as as a separate clip my follow-up to that comment. Okay? And and here's that. Speaker 1: Allowed to nuance, Megan. It's only tribalism. Speaker 0: That's right. So here's Sod 11. Israel, whether it realizes it or not, has made itself the villain of the world in in letting this thing go go on so long. They have lost support amongst their dearest friends, and even the entire Democrat party here in The United States has turned against them, and they're losing Republicans by the day here in America, which is their most important ally. So whether the fight continues to be just or not is almost irrelevant. As Trump said when he was running this time last year, not yet elected, time to wrap it up. And that's how I feel too. And I've given Israel a long berth. I fully understand as an American who was attacked on nine eleven, my country was that, you know, when you attack The United States and you kill thousands of our citizens, and Israel was in this position on 10/07, it's fine to respond, and it doesn't have to be proportionate. Whoever said it has to be proportionate. But what Israel's doing now is losing its standing with the rest of the world. It's starting to lose, too, even with its closest friends, its moral reputation, its moral, high ground. And, as Trump said a year ago, time to wrap it up. Speaker 1: Cue Well said. Speaker 0: The 25 text messages from people I know, like friends who are pro Israel. Like, I'm so sad that you've left us. I'm so sad you let's debate it. You know, many Jewish, advocates saying, let me come on your show, and we'll debate. There's nothing to debate. I'm on Israel's side. Just stop. Me observing I Speaker 1: totally agree. Speaker 0: That you're losing the propaganda war and that this has gone on for about two years now. And look. I mean, I pulled the stats. Support for Israel's military action in Gaza by party ID. GOP in June 2024, 76%. Now 71, so they lost 5%. Dems in October 2023, 36%. Now it's at eight. Independence, October 2023, it was 47%. Now it's 25%. You go under 35, you have almost zero support across The United States, your closest ally. I I see what's happening, and it's my job to comment honestly on it. But I am sick of being lectured on, like, you you have to see it exactly as we see it and support everything, or you're you're against us. Speaker 1: So so this is so important, Megan. And, again, I don't want not every you cannot say everyone in the pro is your and I don't say acts that way. But I Right. I got a text about you, Megan. Sam, why is Megan, like, doing the bidding of Hamas? I was like, what are you talking about? Megan's the best. Like, what she's amazing. And I said, why are you texting me about Megan? And I I I at that point and so this is what they don't understand. You and I, Megan, and Tucker is in the same category, and they've tried to go after Tucker Yeah. Is that the and and the more you attack our moral character, the actually, the more we're gonna double down in the direction because Speaker 0: 100%. Speaker 1: Don't do it that way. Okay? Right. Like, when tell me I'm wrong. Cool. Tell me if I got my facts wrong. By the way, the Epstein thing, Naftali Bennett says he was an Epstein agent. We have to be pursuers of truth. They've denied it. Fine. Let's keep digging. Okay. Fine. But the the the the thing that I don't think I think is being lost is like on some part of the population, you can scold them into silence. Right? But if I have any deviation of a purity test, any deviation whatsoever, such as hosting a focus group, right, Megan, with a bunch of our students that went viral, having Dave Smith or Tucker at my event, it is all of a sudden, oh, Charlie is a he's he's no longer us and all that. So wait a second. What do mean what is with us mean exactly? Right? Mhmm. I'm an American. Okay? Like, I I I represent this country, and I I don't even understand that paradigm. But, Megan, I think you would agree with this. I wanna make sure we fast, like, really zero in on this. Personality types like you, myself, and Tucker, the more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question, which is not isolated. Right? I'm Megan, it would be one thing if it was one text or two text. It is dozens of texts. Yes. Then we start to say, hold the boat here. And and to be fair, some of my really good Jewish friends are like, that's not all of us. It's all but these are leaders too though. Right? These are these are stakeholders. Right? And so, look, I am I'm I'm afraid because again, I want civilization to win. I want the West to win. I don't want the Islam of fascist barbarians to storm the gates of Jerusalem. I want the holy sites protected. I believe in the holy land. I love that Jesus walked on water there and rose from the dead and preached in the the Mount Of Beatitudes. Like, I I feel the connection to Israel. And I but at the same time simultaneously, when the hostile reaction is that now Meghan and Charlie are enemies Right. Boy, I'll tell you. Like, you're you're you're you're you're gonna you're not gonna I won't say lose, but you will weaken and just basically deflate two of your strongest advocates if that continues. Speaker 0: Right. And it to me, I laugh because it's like, I've been bullied by the best of them. The best. And it it didn't work, and it's not going to work with them. And the more you try to tell me I can't criticize Israel, the more likely I am to do it, to focus on exactly what you're doing. Right? Like, what what are you doing that you're so defensive? You don't own me. I don't I don't take $1 of money from any Jewish affiliated group. That's not it's never been what my what my show's model. Take you know, Cozy Earth is my sponsor. People like Genucel. Those are the people I take. And I and I probably would feel reluctant to criticize Genucel, which is a great product, so I probably wouldn't do it anyway. My point is simply I have my honest opinions, which is why I had credibility for the two years I've been defending them. Right? And I still have that credibility, and I don't need lectures from my friends who are more pro Israel than I am or who are just American Jewish people who are concerned about what's happening. I don't need lectures on my coverage. Okay? I'll call it like I see it. And you have no right to come on this show and demand a debate with me because I've said something you disagree with. It's my show, and I'll decide the coverage we do here. Since president Trump was sworn in, his administration has made enormous progress at a breakneck pace. But don't forget, while they are moving mountains for the good of the nation, you've got your personal savings to worry about. And one of the best ways to look after your savings is through diversification, particularly with gold, like from Birch Gold Group. In the past twelve months, the value of gold has increased by 40%, and Birch was an advertiser on this show twelve months ago. If you had purchased then, you'd be 40% richer today. Now's the time. Central banks continue to bolster demand for gold by burying in record quantities. Global instability and tension is high, and Birch Gold makes owning physical gold so easy. Easily convert an existing IRA or four zero one k into a tax sheltered IRA in physical gold, or buy some to store in your home safe. Just text n k to the number 989898, and Birch Gold is gonna send you a free info kit on gold. Look into it. See if it's right for you. There's no obligation, just useful information to help you make a decision. With an a plus rating with a Better Business Bureau and tens of thousands of happy customers, Take control of your savings today. Text MK to 989898. Thanks so much for watching. If you like what you just saw, hit the subscribe button for more clips and full episodes.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵https://t.co/2TtdJ11qAG

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Good Goys Gone Bad: Charlie Kirk Compilation Charlie didn't turn on israel- but israel turned on Charlie. The more I look into it the more I get the feeling he was considering running for president at some point and he's clearly not directly loyal to the Netanyahu crew.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Major themes: Epstein scandal and intel ties; unsealing documents; "Alexander Acosta in 02/2007, he said he was told to treat Epstein carefully because he was an intel asset." The panel asks "unseal all the Epstein documents" and ponders if Epstein was an "intel asset" and even a "Mossad" connection: "MI six, Saudi, or Mossad?"; "I wouldn't be surprised one bit" about intel community involvement. On Israel, Beebe says: "I didn't like how he said this. I'll be honest. You can't be MAGA if you're anti Israel." Ben Shapiro defends Israel; they push back against "legacy media are radically anti Israel." They cite polls showing waning American support for Israel's Gaza actions across parties, warn against stand-downs or regional war, and advocate American-first pragmatism while supporting Israel's right to defend itself.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do, because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open border neoliberal quasi Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now it's coming for Jews, and they're like, what on earth happened? And it's not just the colleges. It's the nonprofits. It's the movies. It's Hollywood. It's all of it. It's like time for you guys to wake up and say no more. Draw a line in the sand. I don't care if you hate me. Why don't you update them, Megan? Speaker 1: Well, this is the first big scandal, I'd say, of the Trump administration that's on team rational. It's not a fake media scandal like the left tries to create for president Trump every other day. It's one of the right's own making, and it's not going well. And it has to do with Jeffrey Epstein. Yeah. Let let me just ask you. Make some noise if you care about the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Speaker 0: Raise your hand if it matters a lot to you. Raise your hand. So every hand of 7,000 people. Speaker 1: Everybody cares. It I think A lot. Speaker 0: I said a lot. Every hand. I'm open to it. If that's true, why don't you just tell us the prisoners' names who are on the same cell block as Jeffrey Epstein? Speaker 1: There's a lot. Speaker 0: No. That's BS. I'm sorry. The president The United States figured out whether they have HIPAA for federal prisoners. Tell us I mean, tell us who the other prisoners were if no one had access to it because all of a sudden, if we find out some of these prisoners had suspicious intel ties. Speaker 1: It's funny because you look back at the the past, Dan and Cash talked about Epstein all the time when they were in my business that Speaker 0: hasn't been a shtick of mine. Speaker 1: Mine neither. Mine neither. I I talked about myself. Right? Same. Same. But I am a lawyer by training, and I can smell BS when it's being shoveled to me. And it's very obvious to me right now that we've got spinners trying to mess with us in Washington on a story that is important, and here's why. Yes. Obviously, child sexual abuse matters. And if we have some ring of pedophiles running around, I mean, outside of Hollywood, we need to know. One of the main reasons that we voted Trump in was because we wanted real answers on real stories, and we didn't wanna be BSed anymore with a bunch of nonsense from our government that treated us like a bunch of stooges. Speaker 0: What is the one two three sequencing? Press conference, you would get rid of Bondi. What else to get us back on track towards transparency? I think the DOJ should immediately move to unseal all the Epstein documents in the Southern District Of New York. Speaker 1: Yeah. Everything. Everything except I think every solitary. Speaker 0: I think every file should be released to the public the same way as the JFK files. Let the American people decide. Do you think there's any intel community involvement in this? Speaker 1: I wouldn't be surprised one bit. I am convinced based on my own sources and my own reporting on this story, he wasn't one of ours. Speaker 0: So he was an American, which leads basically three options. MI six, Saudi, or Mossad? Yep. Which one would you choose? Speaker 1: I guess Mossad, given his connection to Ghislain Maxwell. So Speaker 0: what does that mean? Speaker 1: Well, I mean, it's possible that that's the reason everything's getting buried, that there is some treasure trove, and it's getting buried because Speaker 0: How many people here believe that? Raise your hand. Speaker 1: That was Well a fishy answer. Speaker 0: And, Megan, remember, Alexander Acosta in 02/2007, he said he was told to treat Epstein carefully because he was an intel asset. That was that was one of Trump's cabinet secretaries who was literally a US attorney three hours from here Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: In Florida. He said that himself. He fully No. Again, I don't wanna I don't wanna feed into any of the, let's just say, speculative theories. But Alexander Acosta himself talked about Intel Asset. Yep. And you have to wonder that the timing of all this. Sunday night so you have the big beautiful bill. You have Independence Day weekend. Why are you doing this on a Sunday night? Was it Bury it. But you don't bury things on Sunday nights. Speaker 1: You do on a holiday weekend. You do. Yeah. Color away. They're traveling back from the Speaker 2: beach on Sunday night. They're dealing with traffic. They knew they were too smart to to think that they could get away with doing it on a Saturday night. Speaker 0: No. No. No. But he'll tell the truth and we will lose we will be like, if Bongino can't go and fight and solve this thing, then, like, I mean, what are we doing here? Speaker 1: I know. Speaker 0: Right? If Dan Bongino, who's like one of the greatest patriots we have Yep. Cannot go and reform the FBI with Kash Patel after we win a popular vote majority Right. Then I'm not I'm like, I will never give up, but I know for millions of people that will be met with just a sigh of cynicism. Speaker 3: The last I heard, Israel already controls something 40 to 50% of the territory in Gaza City. They've been warning people to get out for at least a couple of weeks now. Hamas have been stopping people at checkpoints and turning them back and shooting them if they don't stay in the city to be used as human shields by Hamas. So that's the current situation on the ground. Speaker 0: What other feedback or criticism would you have about this situation? I I know that it's impossible for anyone to listen to everything that you ever say, but looking at this from a American perspective, what else would you say things could have been handled differently? Maybe on the PR front, maybe also just on a a conduct front. Where where would you say as an outsider with things that could have been handled better, more efficiently, or with more precision? Author Ben Shapiro, author of Lions and Scavengers. We're gonna get to that in a second. I have one or two other questions on Israel. I think it's very important for our audience to hear this, though, because there is a an incessant campaign. And one thing a friend said to me interestingly, which is, okay, Charlie, we've pushed back against the media on COVID, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border, on so, like, maybe we should also ask a question. Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years. So, Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse. Some people in the Israeli government are saying again, it's all over the place. Right? You have opinions all over. In your opinion, what would a good outcome five years from now be, and how does one respond to the claims of ethnic cleansing? Speaker 3: As far as your earlier question about what we believe from the media, one of the things that I find kind of astonishing in in some of the folks on the right who are highly critical of Israel is actually the the lack of credit the the lack of skepticism when it comes to legacy media. Legacy media are radically anti Israel overall. The New York Times can can certainly not be accused of being a pro Israel outlet. It'd be very difficult to make the accusation that the the Associated Press, which has wore hand in glove with Kamas for years or Reuters, that the these are these are wildly pro Israel outlets. And yet when it comes to the reporting, it seems to be sort of the the opposite. So the the perception of the legacy media is, like, owned by the Jews. Speaker 0: I was gonna say Ben. I'm pro Israel. You Jews own the media, Ben. So, I mean, come on. As you could tell by all the wonderful headlines you guys get. Speaker 3: Well, I mean, dude, the accusation that that we own the media has not prevented, you know, the Daily Wire from from employing people who radically disagree with me on all of these matters. I mean, I don't agree with Matt Walsh on foreign policy. Matt, obviously, is a major host over at Daily Wire. And that's just my shop when I'm I'm I'm overtly pro Israel. Right? I I'm not making any bones about this. I'm a Jew, and I'm a Zionist. I'm not gonna pretend that that to to say otherwise would be absolutely silly. To to suggest that that a some sort of atheistic Jewish person by birth who does not care about Judaism or Israel owning the New York Times means the New York Times is pro Israelis to ignore literally every bit of coverage they have ever done for my entire lifetime. Speaker 0: We we we're we're running out of time here. But just last question on this, Ben. I know this might be a a tougher question, but Beebe said, quote, I didn't like how he said this. I'll be honest. You can't be MAGA if you're anti Israel. I don't like it for a couple reasons. How how did you how did you analyze that statement from Beebe? Speaker 3: I mean and I I think that there is the ungenerous way of interpreting that and then the generous way of interpreting that. So ethnic cleansing, the idea presumably that that population movement is equivalent to ethnic cleansing. I think ethnic cleansing is a term that that's been fairly recently coined to describe population movement during war. And the reality is that's been ongoing for literally all of human history. The idea that that Israel is, quote, unquote, forcing people out of the Gaza Strip, that is not the stated policy of the Israeli government. The idea is if people want to leave, they can, but they're not being forced to leave. Again, moving people out of heavily urbanized areas that are honeycombed with terrorist booby traps pretty much everywhere is not the same thing as, quote, unquote, ethnic cleansing. And I think that ethnic cleansing is is very often used as sort of a a softer form of of the genocide attack. The idea being that Israel is trying to kill everyone, which, of course, is not true. The ungenerous way is to suggest that you have to hold a particular position on every Israeli governmental activity in order to in order to be MAGA, which, of course, is not true. I mean, you can disagree from the right or from the left with with Bibi's policies, and and you can still be plenty MAGA. I think the idea that that Bibi is putting out there is that if you are taking Hamas' side against Israel in a conflict, it is very difficult to align that with the with the stated positions of the Trump administration or what president Trump himself is doing right now. Speaker 0: You you Speaker 3: can't and that much, I certainly is true. Speaker 0: You cannot look. I I think you can have disagreements on Israel and still be MAGA, obviously. You should be America first. But if you're pro Hamas, you're something darker. Speaker 1: You and I are both supporters of Israel and Yeah. Have defended Israel since the beginning of this conflict and and spoken out about the antisemitism that has erupted on these college campuses many, many, many, many times. And something's happening, though, with this whole debate that is really bothering me, and I wonder if you're feeling it too. So I I mean, I genuinely believe you'd be hard pressed to find somebody in the public eye who's been as outspoken a defender of not every move Israel's taken in the war, but of Israel's right to defend itself and of the the just backward awfulness that we've been seeing on college campuses and the backlash against American Jews, then yours truly. I mean, I have been at the pointy end of the spear on this. And I Speaker 0: completely agree with that. Speaker 1: And I it was all heartfelt, and it remains heartfelt. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: However, however, I my contention here is that some in the pro Israel camp are so knee jerk about calling you antisemitic or getting deeply offended if you say anything that doesn't align with their narrative that it undermines their own cause. And I have to tell you, I find it very irritating because I do feel like some of us have earned the right to have some credibility on the subject of Israel and don't wanna be called those names when we have some mild pushback on some of the overreaches, whether it's, you know, whether they're winning or losing the propaganda war right now. And my contention is they've begun to lose it. And I realize it's propaganda coming at us from Hamas, but they their their numbers have turned. Here in America, they've turned. Not so much with Republicans, a little bit with Republicans, but but completely with the Democrat party and with independents. They they have shifted mightily from at least double digits highs to single digit lows now with the with when it comes to approval. And, also, with respect to you and I speculated about this at the Turning Point event, whether the possibility of Jeffrey Epstein possibly being a Mossad agent or asset or affiliated with, that's been turned around on me too to you must be anti Semitic. What the hell? That's such bullshit. Speaker 0: I Speaker 1: The same people who say, you can criticize Israel. That's fine. We won't call you anti Semitic if you criticize Israel. Turn around immediately and say, you're anti Semitic for even raising that. I completely reject that, and I've raised this as a pushback against my friends on that particular strain of the aisle to watch it because you don't wanna alienate people who are openly your friends by going nuts in your crackdowns on mild pushback on anything related to Israel. Now you Speaker 0: take it. I'm so I'm I'm so glad you brought this up. And I would second that. Megan, I think I have a bulletproof resume showing my defense of Israel both on campus, on social media, to to great, you know, let's just say mockery and scorn at times where because I believe it. Right? I I believe in the scriptural land rights given to Israel. I believe in fulfillment of prophecy. And again, I'm not a theologian, but I'm a Christian. My life was changed in Israel. The spiritual energy is so amazing there. I I want them to win. I've said that repeatedly. Same. And however, Megan, you're hitting on something very potent and important. Now let me first say, I don't wanna judge an entire group because there's been many people in the per Israel world that have been very sweet, very kind, very nuanced, very Charlie. You know, you're with us. You don't have to agree all the time. However, and I and I will say this, the behavior by a lot, both privately and publicly, are pushing people like you and me away. Not like we're gonna be pro Hamas. Not like we're gonna but we're like, honestly, the way you are treating me is so repulsive. I have text messages, Megan, calling me an anti Semite. I am learning biblical Hebrew and writing a book on the Shabbat. I honor the Shabbat, literally the Jewish Sabbath. I visit Israel and fight for it. And there's another article out in the Times of Israel today. I could read it on air. I was just reading before I got on. Charlie, what are you doing? Like, why are you what am I doing? I'm sorry. Like, let's just take a step back here. Like, I'm an American citizen. Yes. I want Israel to win. Yes. I'm a Christian. But, like, the sum of the mess and you saw I mean, you've seen how I've been treated, Megan, by some, not all, by some. Speaker 1: No. It's very irritating. It's it's been so unfair. They they were coming after you after a turning point for among other things. They had Dave Smith there. Dave Smith isn't allowed to criticize Israel. You had both sides. The the Israeli side was overrepresented. Speaker 0: No. You're not allowed to. It's even worse than that. Again, I would just wanna repeat for the fifth time. I love Israel. I want Israel to win. But my moral character is now being put into question, Megan. Not my decisions. Not like, hey. Are you doing this? Is it smart or is it dumb? But no. I am a bad person if I do this. And it's a I I could go I mean, I you saw it, Megan. It was trending on Twitter. Thousands of tweets and text messages. And if I were to be charitable and generous, I will say, the people that are attacking me are in a hyperparanoid state because they're at war, and war tends to make things black and white, and you're a hammer looking for a nail. So I'm trying to be charitable, Megan. Literally, I'm trying to cut as much slack as I can. Right? They go, okay. What would it be like if all of a sudden I'm starting to see a pattern of behavior similar to what my grandparents saw in nineteen thirties Germany online? How would I behave? So that's like my charitable kind of over compensation spirit. At the same time, I'm like, but you're it's it's not defensible to be dumb. Right? Yeah. Speaker 1: So And it's offensive. It's offensive to those of us who have been out there defending them in in many instances against critics on our own side. And now you have a couple of comments like, well, what about this? Well, has it gone on too long? Like, is it time to wrap it up? And the thing about Epstein is just so bizarre. I don't know who he was an agent for. It might have been Israel or an asset, or it might have been nobody, but we're allowed to speculate about that. It's like there's some rule. You can't go there when it comes to Israel. Speaker 0: Well, you and I believe that we're Americans and Americans first, Period. End of story. We are citizens of this nation. Okay? That's Israel, we have funded. We have supported. And they're up against a sea of Islamic totalitarianism, and we should be cheering for them. Right? Because they're up against barbarians and and monsters, and we want them to win. However, here is Megan Kelly and Charlie Kirk combined probably 30,000,000 social media followers, like pretty right? And you and I have been holding this down, and you you probably get the negative, oh, you're just shilling for Israel. I'm like, okay. I'm gonna do what's right regardless of the feedback. Right? But then all of a sudden, like, I host a person that I I moderate the debate of, my dear. Right? Right. And I give equal time to Josh Hammer, equal time to a pro Israel advocate, and my moral character is being put into question. And so I I just I think it's a hyper paranoid, like, we're just gonna try to we're we're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice, but it goes to the point where if, for example, if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan? Speaker 1: It that's not right. Wrong headed. I I'll tell you this for me. I got some blowback after saying Mossad possibilities with Epstein, a comment behind which I stand. I mean, I really and I've, of course, reported what Alan Dershowitz has said as his lawyer. He says I think he would have told me. He didn't say he had any of those connections. I hear all that. That doesn't mean it's not true. I think all these things should be explored. It's one of the many things that should be explored around Epstein. But saying that and also saying he might be a US asset, etcetera, doesn't make you anti Semitic. That's fucking crazy. And then we get to last week, I go on Piers Piers Morgan. Right? So I go on Piers Morgan last week, and I don't talk about Israel a lot on this show. I just like, covering the day to day of a conflict like this is not my thing. It's not what we do here at the Megan Kelly show. We haven't done it for Ukraine. We haven't done it for Israel. We haven't done it for a lot of conflicts, but we'll talk about it when big things happen. So Piers talks about it a lot. Piers asked me it was a very interesting kinda culture study. So he asked me about the the photos of the starving children out of Gaza. And I said a couple of things, both of which got a fair amount of pickup. Alright. So first, this is what I said about the photos. Listen to Sop 10. Well, I'm always reluctant to put too much stock in the images coming out of Gaza, that that phrase, because they're manipulated, and they're masters of propaganda, and they're fine having their own children starve just as long as they can put them on camera and show them off to the world. That that's Hamas. And, frankly, it's lot of Palestinians, so I'm very skeptical of taking those images at face value and saying it's Israel's fault. Okay. So that clip gets circulating Speaker 0: I'm with you on that. Speaker 1: A mill a million times by my Israeli friends and my Jewish friends online. Like, go, Megan. Yeah. Okay. Great. Cool. Cool. Cool. Yeah. She's right on. Look at her you know, speak truth to Piers. And then Piers released as a as a separate clip my follow-up to that comment. Okay? And and here's that. Speaker 0: Not a lot of nuance, Megan. It's only tribalism. Speaker 1: That's right. So here's sod 11. Israel, whether it realizes it or not, has made itself the villain of the world in in letting this thing go go on so long. They have lost support amongst their dearest friends. And even the entire Democrat party here in The United States has turned against them, and they're losing Republicans by the day here in America, which is their most important ally. So whether the fight continues to be just or not is almost irrelevant. As Trump said when he was running this time last year, not yet elected, time to wrap it up. And that's how I feel too. And I've given Israel a long berth. I fully understand as an American who was attacked on 09/11, my country was that, you know, when you attack The United States and you kill thousands of our citizens, and Israel was in this position on 10/07, it's fine to respond, and it doesn't have to be proportionate. Whoever said it has to be proportionate. But what Israel's doing now is losing its standing with the rest of the world. It's starting to lose too even with its closest friends, its moral reputation, its moral, high ground. And, as Trump said a year ago, time to wrap it up. Cue Well said. The 25 text messages from people I know, like friends who are pro Israel. Like, I'm so sad that you've left us. I'm so sad you let's debate it. You know, many Jewish, advocates think, let me come on your show, and we'll debate. There's nothing to debate. I'm on Israel's side. Just stop. Me observing Speaker 0: I totally agree. Speaker 1: That you're losing the propaganda war and that this has gone on for about two years now. And look. I mean, I pulled the stats. Support for Israel's military action in Gaza by party ID. GOP in June 2024, 76%. Now 71, so they lost 5%. Dems in October 2023, 36%. Now it's at eight. Independence, October 2023, it was 47%. Now it's 25%. You go under 35, you have almost zero support across The United States, your closest ally. I I see what's happening, and it's my job to comment honestly on it. But I am sick of being lectured on, like, you you have to see it exactly as we see it and support everything, or you're you're against us. Speaker 0: So so this is so important, Megan. And, again, I don't want not every you cannot say everyone in the pros are and I don't say it acts that way. But I Right. I got texts about you, Megan. Sam, why is Megan, like, doing the bidding of Hamas? I was like, what are you talking about? Megan's the best. Like, what she's amazing. And I said, why are you texting me about Megan? And I I I at that point and so this is what they don't understand. You and I, Megan, and Tucker is in the same category, and they've tried to go after Tucker. Yeah. Is that the and and the more you attack our moral character, the actually, the more we're gonna double down in the direction because 100%. I don't do it that way. Okay? Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Like, when tell me I'm wrong. Cool. Tell me if I've got my facts wrong. By the way, on the Epstein thing, Naftali Bennett says he was an Epstein agent. We have to be pursuers of truth. They've denied it. Fine. Let's keep digging. Okay. Fine. But the the the the thing that I don't think I think is being lost is, like, on some part of the population, you can scold them into silence. Right? But if I have any deviation of a purity test, any deviation whatsoever, such as hosting a focus group, right, Megan, with a bunch of our students that went viral, having Dave Smith or Tucker at my event, it is all of a sudden, oh, Charlie is a, he's he's no longer with us and all that. So wait a second. What do you mean? What does with us mean exactly? Right? Mhmm. I'm an American. Okay? Like, I I I represent this country, and I I don't even understand that paradigm. But, Megan, I think you would agree at this. I wanna make sure we fast, like, really zero in on this. Personality types like you, myself, and Tucker, the more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question, which is not isolated. Right? I'm Megan, it'll be one thing if it was one text or two text. It is dozens of texts. Yes. Then we start to say, hold the boat here. And and to be fair, some of my really good Jewish friends are like, that's not all of us. It's all. But these are leaders too though. Right? These are these are stakeholders. Right? And so look. I I'm I'm I'm afraid because again, I want civilization to win. I want the West to win. I don't want the Islam of fascist barbarians to storm the gates of Jerusalem. I want the holy sites protected. I believe in the holy land. I love that Jesus walked on water there and rose from the dead and preached in the, the Mount Of Beatitudes. Like, I I feel the connection to Israel. And I but at the same time simultaneously, when the hostile reaction is that now Meghan and Charlie are enemies. Right. Boy, I'll tell you. Like, you're you're you're you're you're gonna you're not gonna I won't say lose, but you will weaken and just basically deflate two of your strongest advocates if that continues. Speaker 1: Right. And it to me, I laugh because it's like, I've been bullied by the best of them. The best. And it it didn't work, and it's not going to work with them. And the more you try to tell me I can't criticize Israel, the more likely I am to do it, to focus on exactly what you're doing. Right? Like, what what are you doing that you're so defensive? You don't own me. I don't I don't take $1 of money from any Jewish affiliated group. That's not that's never been what my what my show's model. Take you know, Cozy Earth is my sponsor. People like Genucel. Those are the people I take. And I probably would feel reluctant to criticize Genucel, which is a great product, so I probably wouldn't do it anyway. My point is simply, I have my honest opinions, which is why I had credibility for the two years I've been defending them. Right? And I still have that credibility, and I don't need lectures from my friends who are more pro Israel than I am or who are just American Jewish people who are concerned about what's happening. I don't need lectures on my coverage. Okay? I'll call it like I see it. And you have no right to come on this show and demand a debate with me because I've said something you disagree with. It's my show and I'll decide the coverage we do here. Speaker 2: I just have way too many questions that makes me think about what the motives are. And if we go dark, I'll put all those things out there. Yeah. How did how did these guys not know this was taking place? Speaker 0: So I've been in Israel many times. The whole country is a fortress. When I first heard this story, I still had the same gut instinct that I did initially. I find this very hard to believe. I've been to that Gaza border. You you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with an AR 15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier. Right? The whole country is surveilled. And so let me just kind of go through this. We don't talk about Israeli politics very often, and most Americans don't know this. The last nine months, Israel was on the brink of civil war. It's not an exaggeration. This judicial stuff, there were there were hundreds of thousands of Israelis taking to the streets because Bibi Netanyahu was basically redefining the Israeli constitution. That's not an exaggeration. Right? He said the judicial branch has too much power. There were protests planned this week against Netanyahu where they anticipated tens of thousands of people to take to the streets. That's all gone, Patrick. Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead. I'm not I'm not willing to say to go so far that saying that Netanyahu knew or there was intelligence here, but I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hours? I don't believe it. Israel's the side of New Jersey. When I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it's forty five minutes. Wow. Six hours. They're livestreaming the killing of Jews. Was did somebody in the government say stand down? That is a legitimate non conspiracy question. The whole country is the IDF. The whole country is. Yeah. And you're trying to tell me that they're going to concerts and kibbutzes and schools and by reports, six hours. Let's say it's three hours. That's suspect. Go ahead, Rob. Speaker 4: It's also not like a right wing reporting. This is from the New York Times. The long wait for help as massacre unfolds in Israel. I can't think of a more liberal news outlet than New York Speaker 0: Times. And and by the way, I I'm actually very pro Israel. So let me be very I mean Mhmm. So I'm not exactly I think we all are. No. No. I just wanna make sure my position is clear here. But I would so Patrick, there are other explanations. It's possible that the Netanyahu government was double crossed by bad agents. Okay? That's dark, but it's not as dark as what we're talking about. Okay? Another aspect is that Netanyahu might have traitors in his government, like legitimate traitors that have infiltrated. I was texting with some senior people in the IDF and they said, Charlie, can't say too much, but let's just say the same problem you have with the left in America we have here in Israel. So there's something to think about. Just something to think about, right? Is that maybe there are some people within those intel agencies that aren't as sympathetic. Or maybe, Patrick, maybe they might have gotten a tip, they might have gotten whispers, but no one thought it would be 1,200 Jews dead. That's a potential, right? Because here's the essence of it. The essence is this: this is the closest thing to the Holocaust that any of us have lived through. But the fact is now Bibi and the Israeli hard right government has a mandate I've to be careful the way I say this to they're going to try to ethnically cleanse Gaza. I mean, that's and I don't use that term lightly. Okay? They're talking about basically removing 2,500,000 people from there. Okay? And honestly, they have a mandate to go seek justice and revenge. They do. There is This idea that they need to have a truce or a peace treaty, that's morally crap after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets. But there are some serious questions here, Patrick. And let me tell you, my pattern recognition over the last five years has become pretty sharp. COVID, Maui fires, you know, Epstein. When I see a story and it doesn't click, we're our guts are usually right. I just want to be very sorry to interrupt. I'm saying that's what they're going to be accused of. If there are some people in public life in Israel that Patrick, what did your pilot guy say? I want only Jews in Israel. Right? Okay. That is a form of ethnically cleansing because 20% of Israel is Arab. Correct. Mean, look, here so let me also make sure I criticize both sides. Okay? So I'm gonna criticize the people that, you know, do the paragliding and it's sick. Lindsey Graham is an irresponsible lawmaker for what he's saying. Bombing Iranian oil depots? This thing could get wildly out of control very, very quickly. The last thing America needs is a kinetic war against Iran, an 87,000,000 person country that has a pretty fierce fighting spirit, a country at five times the size of Iraq. Five times the size of Iraq. We're gonna go start bombing oil depots. Yeah. That could get Russia further involved, China involved. Yeah. Look. The Armageddon situation is that for Israel, the Armageddon situation is that they overreact so much that they lose their Arab neutrality. Right now, they have neutrality with Egypt. If they overreact, they could lose that. They have warm conversations. I won't say a peace deal yet with Saudi Arabia. They could lose that. Jordan plays ball because America demands they play ball. They could lose that. Syria, Bashar al Assad, he acts as if it doesn't exist, but that could change in a moment's notice. Right? Lebanon via Hezbollah is already there. They could be all of a sudden dealing with a 15 country invasion of Speaker 2: Israel. Can they handle that? Speaker 0: They have in the past. I mean, the the Six Day War, the Yom Kippur War. The Yom Kippur War, for example, they were invaded from every direction. At the the Balfour declaration, when they were came a country in 1948, every Arab country declared war on them. Yeah. And and they were they almost lost the country. And to their credit, they held it off, and they earned the right to be Israel. I I I The women have no rights The answer is it shouldn't be a top priority of the American government because we have so many problems here to execute a CIA coup d'etat in another country. You have to put sanctions on. You have to put them in check. You have to try to, in my personal opinion, allow Israel to seek justice. At the same time, you cannot allow this to turn into a regional broader war. You know why? Because the adult America is gonna have to come clean it up. That's why. If we allow if we just kinda say, oh, it doesn't this thing turns into a regional conflict, we're gonna have more troops on the ground, and we're gonna have to go clean up this mess, as Trump calls it, in the region of sand and death while our own country is disintegrating and collapsing.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵https://t.co/PvhN9kDdAp

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk Show | Sep 3, 2025 (10 days ago) "HUGE Epstein BOMBSHELL! List to Come! But There's a HUGE Twist" In this episode Charlie is explicit that Trump is not in the Epstein files. Even still, he continues to push to have the files released and has been a non stop advocate of the FULL UNREDACTED RELEASE of the files.

Video Transcript AI Summary
From the bitcoin.com studio, the host critiques NBC’s Epstein coverage and the impulse to tie events to Donald Trump. "This was a swing and a miss and a media loss right here." He notes NBC’s question: "Did anybody see or hear of the president himself doing anything inappropriate as it related to Jeffrey Epstein? No." The reply: "No... President Donald Trump was not involved in any of that stuff, period." He warns of a "bandwagon effect" and "half truths" used to extract money, cautioning against Me Too hysteria. He cites "a massive multibillion dollar Epstein compensation fund" and calls it "a big miss for those people that wanted to take out Donald Trump" in a "three ring media circus." He urges prudence and due process, cautioning against dubious claims like "Juliet Bryant is an alleged victim who got money and says she was abducted by a UFO."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay, everybody. We're here at the bitcoin.com studio. That is the bitcoin.com studio. So it's been, I'm a say, a week or two probably since we've covered the Epstein situation. We are covering a lot of other stories. And the media, they they were waiting for this. You see, congress, they brought in a lot of the Epstein victims, and it's undoubtedly terrible what Epstein did to the underage high school girls and groomed them and sexually abused them. They're bringing in all of these Epstein victims. Interestingly, one of them is a man, so I don't that's breaking news, at least to me. I don't quite know all the details surrounding that. And the NBC News thought they have their moment. It is the media. They want nothing more than to be able to tie this to Donald Trump. They bring all of these Epstein victims, one after the other after the other, and they have their big moment. The media is just waiting for a metaphorical kill shot on Donald Trump. Amazingly, if all the questions they could ask, this is the one. But in some ways, I'm kinda glad they asked it in kind of a sick and twisted way. I'm glad they did. I'm glad they were able to air it out because this was a swing and a miss and a media loss right here. And this kinda goes to show that there's a lot of misinformation and half truths that are circulating around this entire thing, especially in the proximity of president Trump, especially. So here it is. NBC News. Ready to go. Try to get Donald Trump. We got him dead to rights. We got the panel. We got them all lined up. This is gonna be it. The NBC producers, they're waiting and they're waiting. We're gonna have our moment. We're gonna play cut 400. Speaker 1: I do have to ask, and I know and it's just something that that I think we're compelled to at this moment with the attention on president Trump, with these questions around a pardon. Did anybody see or hear of the president himself doing anything inappropriate as it related to Jeffrey Epstein? No. Speaker 0: No. No. The answer is no. No. President Donald Trump was not involved in any of that stuff, period. Hard stop. So anticlimactic. No. No. This is cut four zero one. This is another one of the Epstein victims. Several of us as a team of survivors have been discussing creating our own list of names. We know the names. Many of us were abused by them, and now together as survivors, we'll confidentially compile the names. Play Cut four zero one. Speaker 2: Several of us, Epstein survivors, have been discussing creating our own list of names. We know the names. Many of us were abused by them. Now together as survivors, we will confidentially compile the names we all know were regularly in the Epstein world, and it will be done by survivors and for survivors. No one else is involved. Speaker 0: So there is ongoing reporting, though. This is why you gotta be very careful with this stuff, everybody. You saw this with the Jerry Sandusky case in Penn State. You gotta be very, very careful with situations like this because you can get a lot you can get a bandwagon effect where a lot of people use half truths to be able to get money from a guy that obviously had a lot of assets. So you gotta you gotta have a lot you gotta pursue evidence. But you saw right there with the other previous clip. I just gotta replay this anticlimactic one. You gotta see this big wind up from NBC. We gotta replay cut 400. Replay cut 400. Speaker 1: I do have to ask, and I know and it's just something that that I think we're compelled to at this moment with the attention on president Trump, with these questions around a pardon. Did anybody see or hear of the president himself doing anything inappropriate as it related to Jeffrey Epstein? No. Speaker 0: It's I could I could watch that on repeat. That that's the entire media narrative poof. By the way, if the answer was yes, we would have heard this years ago. Biden would have been sitting on files that showed Donald Trump compromised with anything Epstein. They would have released this a long time ago. And I'm just gonna be honest with a lot of these movements that we see. We saw this with Sandusky. We saw this with others. And Michael Tracy on Twitter, quote, the British model and socialite who stayed in contact with Jeffrey Epstein into her thirties and who was ruled by a judge to have endured no illegal sexual activity is currently speaking at the big Epstein press conference. You get a lot of hanger ons. You get a lot of bandwagon effect. You get a lot of people in moments like this that are gonna try to either get money or try to ruins peep ruin somebody's character, and especially they'll try to ruin Donald Trump's character. And you saw in NBC, they can't even do that. You gotta use discernment. You gotta use prudence. So you gotta stay very cautious. Remember the lessons of the Me Too movement, and remember Kavanaugh. Remember all of that. And just another one. Again, a a lot of the people I'm sure that are presenting at this press conference were harmed and have terrible situations of them. Others, Juliet Bryant is an alleged victim who got money and says she was abducted by a UFO. It's quite a claim. In situations like this, I am coming at this from a perspective. Number one, they're gonna try to they're gonna try to smear and slander president Trump completely unnecessarily here. You saw this with the fake Wall Street Journal piece. You now saw this with the whole panel. Nuh-uh. Donald Trump wasn't involved. By the time the show ends, another American family farm will shut down. Not because they stopped working, but because a lot of grocery store meat doesn't come from them anymore. Over 85% of the grass fed beef in The US stores is imported, and most people have no idea. That's why I get all of my meat from goodranchers.com. Good Ranchers doesn't just sell meat, they guide you back to the source. All Good Ranchers products are a 100% born, raised, and harvested in The USA from local family farms. And with summer in full swing, there's nothing better than good food shared with your friends and family. Whether it's burgers by the pool, steaks on the grill, or nuggets for an easy meal, make sure you're serving America's best meat this summer. Plus, if you subscribe to any good rancher's box today, you'll get your pick of free meat for life. That's free Wagyu burgers, hot dogs, bacon, or chicken wings in every box for the lifetime of your subscription. And if you use my exclusive code Kirk at checkout, you get extra $40 off your first box. Once again, visit goodranchers.com. Use my code Kirk to get your free meat for life plus $40 off. Goodranchers.com. American meat delivered. But additionally, we're starting to verge in the territory on this story the way that it's going right now where this is way too me too. Where, okay, you're abducted by aliens, and you were kind of like in your thirties who was ruled by a judge to have no illegal sexual activity. And and so this is bad for two reasons. It's bad because the young ladies who were actually abused by this monster, Jeffrey Epstein, are now gonna be looped into some of these liars, and that's bad. And then number two, it's also just bad on its merits. There can be a temptation to rush into blind trust and a lack of healthy skepticism. A lot of Jeffrey Epstein victims were adults, and that distinction is important. Not all of them. Jeffrey Epstein absolutely also engaged with underaged people as well. I don't know if it's both men and women, but men seem to be part of the panel, but at least women. My take right now and my approach, and I this is my contribution to the zeitgeist, is I cut my teeth. I have the wounds to show during the Me Too movement. During the Me Too movement, I learned a lot. We saw the whole country lose its mind during mass hysteria. So let's not do that again. We need empirical data, and especially if there are people like Michael Tracy tweets, this British socialite, who a judge endured no illegal activity and stayed in contact with Epstein into the thirties into her thirties. Guys, that's not someone that I think we should be platforming, and we just want the truth. And a lot of this, again, it undermines the actual victims, and then you have a gold rush. And that's the problem. This happens way too often in situations like this, is you see a gold rush. San you from Sandusky to I I guess, like, 50 examples. The Weinstein case, by the way, Harvey Weinstein is a great example. Candace Owens has done some actually very interesting reporting on this. I don't know if I agree with all that she's actually really made me reconsider. But the point being is that you have a gold rush in situations like this where you have real victims at the core who deserve restitution and deserve justice, and then you have people on the exterior who present themselves as real victims either for attention or money. But the key today and the big takeaway is that this was a major swing and a miss for the media. They wanted to try to take out Trump. The democrats are desperate for a new narrative. And in the most anticlimactic lead balloon way that I've ever seen on live television, no. Wasn't involved. No. We're gonna keep analyzing this, but I we're now starting to see the ghosts of me too past start to seep into this, the language, the terminology. And I think we gotta learn our lessons from the Kavanaugh, from the guilty until proven innocent stuff that we saw. And that's not to say that every one of these individuals is like that, but Juliette Bryan who got money and said she was abducted by a UFO, I mean, that's an interesting claim. Love to learn more about that. We're cautious as we should be because you're dealing with people's, not just reputation, but you're dealing with the truth. And what you do not want, what will invalidate the actual abuse of these victims and the treacherous elements of this, whether it be intel agencies or all the other stuff, will be a bunch of opportunists that gold rush into this in a me too way to try to get cash or try to get clicks. Try to get cash, try to get clicks. Like this British socialite model. I don't know who this person's name is. Michael Tracy's reporting. You guys can look at all Michael Tracy's stuff at M Tracy. You gotta be prudent. You gotta be cautious. But at least my instinct feels a little bit too much like the Weinstein, the Kavanaugh. This whole thing is starting to raise some red flags for me, guys. It's starting to feel like much more of a a operation that we traditionally would ask questions about. It's kind of turning into a a three ring media circus. When there is money to be made by accusing people, accusers will appear. So we need to be cautious. We're gonna call balls and strikes as hard evidence emerges. The big takeaway today is that this is a big miss for those people that wanted to take out Donald Trump. And final point, there is a massive multibillion dollar Epstein compensation fund. There is a high incentive for people to say they were victims of him. There were real victims of him. A 100%. But now we're verging on we're we're blurring some lines like this one socialite who was a judge ruled no illegal sexual activity, was an adult when they when she engaged with Epstein, and stayed in contact through his thirties. We do not want hysteria. That's bad for everybody. We are anti hysteria and anti panic. Email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com. The final point is many of them then want to extract money from wealthy people who undoubtedly get embroiled in the coming fallout. I don't know. This is raising some antennas here. Got a little red flags going on here because I live through the nonsense and the carnage of me too. Let us not participate in that kind of circus. Let's be prudent. Let's look at the evidence. Let's weigh it. Give everybody due process. And that's our take. Big swing and a miss for those trying to take out Donald Trump.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵10 Minutes of the clip the media is spinning as not "not Charlies words".https://t.co/sMKQ0NDXmR

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

This episode is being scrubbed form the internet. The Charlie Kirk Show November 16, 2023 Please Spread/Download/Post🧵(UPDATING)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker proclaims the 'win for liberty' and the 'liberation of Twitter' as a victory for truth and shaping the narrative against the 'uniparty regime.' Elon Musk is praised as a hero who enabled open speech and the ability to question narratives. He discusses a controversial ad showing a white father telling his son to confront anti-Semitic posts, and notes Elon Musk's reply to a commenter: 'you have said the actual truth.' The controversial tweet quoted in the discussion states, 'Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them.' The segment cites Tucker Carlson asserting that 'Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas.' The host adds, 'It is sloppy. It is shallow. It is wrong and repulsive to call a great man Elon Musk an anti Semite,' and argues 'Intentions mean next to nothing here.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, everybody. Radio stations across the country. Honored to be with you. You can email us as alwaysfreedom@CharlieKirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Excellent event last evening in Reno, Nevada. It's great to see so many of you. I cannot emphasize enough. The win for liberty, the win for humanity that the liberation of Twitter has meant for all of us. It's remarkable. Liberating Twitter from what it once us was to what it is now is a win for the narrative. It's a win for truth. It's a win as we try to fight back against this uniparty regime, the tyrants, and the authoritarian dictators that are running the country. Elon Musk, even if they shut down Twitter today, will go down as a major hero for allowing us to be able to speak, to question narratives, to get the truth out. Elon Musk got himself in a little bit of trouble yesterday. Elon Musk responded to a tweet that I actually don't think the tweet is that smart. I think one part of it is legit. But I think another part of it is not so great. But the essence of what Elon was responding to is a major thought crime in America. That the world's wealthiest man would comment on this is historic. So here's the tweet, and it's responding to a video. And the video was basically, a white father with his white son saying to his son, hey, you think that, you know, you're posting online all this anti Semitic stuff. Why don't you go and say this to these Jewish families face? Pretty powerful advertisement. This is the ad. Okay? It's about a minute long. It's a powerful ad. And then a person on Twitter responded to this advertisement, and then Elon responded to the person responding to the advertisement. It's important. Bear with us. Because right now, Elon Musk is being targeted like never before. Elon Musk was supposed to speak at a summit today, and he's been canceled. They don't wanna hear from Elon Musk because they are tarring and feathering him as an anti Semite. They've come after this program for calling us anti Semites. They're coming after Elon Musk for calling, they're calling him an anti Semite. So here's the advertisement. It's a powerful ad. Play cut 79. Speaker 1: I saw what you've been posting. Hitler was right. I didn't teach you that. You hide behind your screen, spewing all this hatred and ugliness. You got something they wanna say? Get out of the truck and say it to their faces. Speaker 0: Okay. So that that advertisement then was responded to by this person, the artist formerly known as Eric. Quote, okay. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. I am deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest swear word, let's just say tiniest crap, now about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. You want truth said to your face? There it is. Now let me just say, this is not is not a very well written tweet. I said it's very confusing. I'll go through what they're basically saying here. Half of this tweet is true, half of it I don't like. You want the truth said to your face? There it is. Elon responds and he says, you have said the actual truth. Now we don't know what part Elon is saying is the actual truth. So let's go through this. Again, it's double negatives and misuse of the word disinterested. It's a strange tweet that Elon pinpointed on here. But the first part is absolutely true. Let's go to this. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. Now I don't like generalizations. Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true the Anti Defamation League was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left wing anti white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke, and it wasn't just ADL. It was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges. Right? Mark Rowan, Leon Kaufman. Can we get that full list? It's very powerful. The part of the so that's totally true. And by way, Tucker Carlson reinforces this. So I'm gonna kinda it was quite a day on the Internet. Tucker Carlson was inter interviewing Candace Owens. We have Candace Owens coming up next hour, and Tucker Carlson mentions that Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. We said this, by the way, last week, and people came after us. We came we actually said it in a different way. We said, I'm glad that Jewish Americans are reconsidering their financing of cultural Marxism, and people misunderstood it intentionally and slandered us as being anti Semites. But listen to this: Tucker Carlson is completely correct by saying this, that the philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country. Play cut 92. Speaker 2: However, then I thought, well, wait a second. If the biggest donors at, say, Harvard have decided, well, we're gonna shut it down now. Where were you the last ten years when Speaker 1: they're before? Speaker 2: As Jenna said, you were allowing this, and then I found myself really hating those people, actually. That you're okay with that? On what grounds were you okay with that? Speaker 1: And I this is what I've been trying to explain to the pro Israel lobby that what you were seeing is lack of support. It's people that are asking the question is where were you Yeah. As we have endured all of this. You were paying Speaker 2: for it, actually. Speaker 1: Right. You were Speaker 2: paying for it. Speaker 1: You were you were paying for it. Speaker 2: You calling my children immoral for their skin color. You paid for that. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I So Speaker 2: why shouldn't I be mad at you? I don't understand. Speaker 0: So what what Tucker is saying is similar to part of the tweet that Elon isolated. That is true. That let's just say liberals, but that includes Jewish financiers of liberal causes didn't really care about University of Chicago having courses that saying, you know, the problem with whiteness. They didn't really care about American Express saying that we must eliminate whiteness. They didn't, in fact, they were supportive of it. A lot of liberals were okay with critical race theory, diversity, equity, inclusion. ADL went all in on the BLM type narrative, and ADL is one of many different organizations that were perfectly fine with the growing anti white wave. Now, to be clear, many of these Jews did not fully understand what they were financing. Their intentions were probably pretty good. As we've said, intentions mean next to nothing here. And I'm sure some of the intentions weren't so good, but let's just attention to the side. I'm not that interested in intentions. I'm interested in actions. Okay? Intentions are very hard to pinpoint. We get too caught up in the conservative movement on intentions. I learned this from the great Dennis Prager, who says stop focusing on intentions, focus on the actions. It's a much better way to judge whether or not something is right or wrong. Intentions, as I've said before, and there's a video that went viral, the Nazis thought they were doing good. They convinced themselves that they were doing good, when in reality, they were doing some of the greatest evil in the history of the species. So, Hamas thinks they're doing good. I could go through all this, but they're doing evil. So I'm not convinced that somebody's intentions are what matter. Many Jewish financiers culturally given money to George Washington University, Columbia, Yale, Dartmouth over and over and over again, hundreds of millions of dollars, billions of dollars, financing many nonprofits that many of them are now recognizing and realizing this was a bad idea. So I'm gonna build this out because the second part of the tweet I don't like, and it ties into some news that is not so good for AOC. It's not good for Ayanna Pressley. I'm gonna isolate that in just a second. But let me just say before I talk about my Patriot supply. It is sloppy. It is shallow. It is wrong and repulsive to call a great man Elon Musk an anti Semite. It cheapens the label of anti Semitism. It is not good for anybody.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Steve Bannon Event https://t.co/GJie222tgI

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk Show | Jul 11, 2025 "Steve Bannon Goes On EPIC Ultra MAGA Rant on Epstein & Deep State" Guys...it doesn't get anymore obvious than this. I'm putting together all the pieces but stuff like this is literally everywhere. For the past 6 months or more Charlie has been pushing for the release of the Epstein files while directly tying it to mossad. If these connections aren't taken seriously and investigated... That should be all the confirmation you need. Steve Bannon has been talking about running for president recently. Keep your eye on Bannon. I have a feeling he's next. Get to it and spread it before it's deleted. Go to YT and Kirk's channel and filter Epstein. Spread everything.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"God Bless America Again." "Alan Jackson Ministries is working hard to bring back biblical truth back into our culture." "Go to alenjackson.com/charlie for free shipping on God Bless America." "There's only one way to fix this." "Two or three action steps by Sunday afternoon." "I think it's special prosecutor ever." "The Epstein is some the question's very simple. Who governs this country? The American people or the deep state?" "Tom Fenton is not a lawyer." "You name Tom Fitten a special prosecutor." "He brings in a team of actual prosecutors." "There may be some victim issues here." "Would you believe Tom Fitten will release all the documents?" "The three most powerful institutions in Washington DC, the Federal Reserve, the Central Intelligence Agency and CENCOM."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you take time to understand how God has consistently blessed America, pouring his grace and mercy on us over and over again, it will give you hope for the days ahead. We cannot afford to forget our past, good and bad, or we will forfeit the best opportunities of our future. God Bless America Again. This book will sharpen your perspective on what it means to bring God's truth into our nation today. Alan Jackson Ministries is working hard to bring back biblical truth back into our culture. Go to alenjackson.com/charlie for free shipping on God Bless America. Again, that's Alan Jackson, allenjackson.com/charlie. I love what I learned from Alan Jackson, and you will too. Welcome, everybody. We are here at the Student Action Summit in Tampa, Florida, and look at this crowd that we have here. Look at this. That's as good as it gets. We are here with Stephen K. Bannon. Steve, you've just been yelling for the last two hours. You you're pretty fired up about this Epstein thing. I I just got a call from someone in Washington. Let's not say his name. But he was like, wait. Speaker 1: A very dialed in guy. Super dialed in. Really super dialed Speaker 0: in. He's like, wait. Is this Epstein thing kinda big? I thought it's over. And Speaker 1: so first of all They think it's over because the media had eight minutes of president Trump as 20 questions and didn't mention it once. So even president Trump thinks it's over. Speaker 0: And so, Steve, what is your recommendation, your suggestion on how to fix this? Speaker 1: There's only one way to fix this. We have to come out of Tampa just like the Patriots did on doing like the Boston resolves. We have to come out with the Tampa resolves. Two or three action steps by Sunday afternoon. We're all committed to, all of us, to say this must happen, and I think it's special prosecutor ever. But we have to say no more nothing. We have to go forward with this. And the reason we're going forward with this, we're there to assist and augment president Trump, to help save president Trump's presidency because they are coming for another coup. You can see it happening. Just like the dark clouds were around Kennedy. Right? They they moved in and moved in and moved in. They assassinated him in in in Vietnam, and then they blew his head off in the middle of the day in in Dallas, Texas with a patsy named Lee Harvey Oswald that we find out sixty two years later was on the payroll of the CIA as they looked your parents in the eye and lied to them for sixty years. They're gonna lie about everything today and hope that seventy years from now nobody will care about it. Do you care about it? Yeah. If we don't come out of here united with Turning Point, as powerful as Turning Point is, if we don't come out of here and say, no more, more, we must have this because if we don't take down the deep state, we're gonna lose the entire country, and they think they're winning. They're laughing at us right now. They're laughing at you. They're mocking you. This is the Epstein is some the question's very simple. Who governs this country? The American people or the deep state? Do do they have do they have the consent of the governor on what they're doing right now? I hear a lot of talk. Speaker 0: Now now Speaker 1: see some action. Speaker 0: Now now, Steve, so special prosecutor, who would you recommend, and what does that scope look like? Because special prosecutors can be kind of a dead end sometimes. Speaker 1: It can't be. My recommendation right now would it be Tom Fenton. Tom Fenton is not a lawyer. He can hire all the lawyers. Is Tom Fenton have credibility with everybody? If Tom quit and Fitten looks you in the eye after everything he's gone through and fought for and said, here's what it is. Would you believe Tom Fitten? Would you believe Tom Fitten will release all the documents? It's very simple. You name Tom Fitten a special prosecutor. He brings in a team of actual prosecutors. You go to the court, and the first thing you do is petition the court to unseal all the sealed evidence. Right? Yeah. Number two is you take collect all the other evidence, not just from the FBI and the justice department, from every agency in our government, and you put it forward. Right? By the way, there may be some victim issues here. It just that's gonna have to be dealt with. You're gonna have to deal it. Do you guys wanna see everything or just some things? Yeah. Everything. You wanna see everything? Yeah. And you're prepared to take the accountability if that happens? Yeah. Are you? Yeah. You? Yeah. You gotta do a gut check. That's why we need these resolves this weekend. You do that. Also, the special prosecutor has a second mandate, and that is to be able to impanel a federal criminal grand jury that he can then bring all the evidence he finds if he finds it to the grand jury about the intelligence agencies and the interconnectivity with foreign governments, whether it's British government and MI six, the Saudi government and Saudi intelligence, Mossad and Shin Ben and the Israeli government and the CIA and all the other 17, intelligence apparatuses that you're paying for. He must get to that to see if there's any interconnectivity and who actually governs the American people. Speaker 0: So so, Steve, for people that were watching in the Western Washington press court, in the White House, let's say. They say, why do people care about this so much? Explain it. Bring us into the MAGA mind. Why let's just pan the audience. Raise your hand if the Epstein thing is very important to you. Raise your hand. Can we just show that pan shot really quick, guys? Keep your hands Speaker 1: up. It's a 100%. Speaker 0: Every hand goes up. Some people have two hands up. Speaker 1: It's Speaker 0: 100 but, Steve, why is it very important? This is by the way, this is ultra MAGA 10.2 o. MAGA. It's it's ultra MAGA as it gets. Speaker 1: Number one, it's the crimes against children. Right? The trafficking of children. But number two, it's what that trafficking was used for. Right? They need they have fought this from day one, and this is president Trump's hardest core base. And the only way this goes away, if these people, not just an answer, if they don't see a process that they can buy into, that they think are gonna treat them like adults and get the information to them, you know what they're gonna say? I'm out. I'm out. And if they're out, there is no MAGA movement going forward. Why do you think the press corps didn't answer my question? They hate you. They hate MAGA. They hate the power you have over Washington DC. That's where they're gonna roll over. They want this to go away. They know why because they know that you'll get just, okay, I'm gonna go away too. That's why there's not all the great stuff, the deportations, the tariffs, the economic program. This is why this is so important. And one of the tales you're gonna have, it's what's happening in Ukraine and what's happening in The Middle East. The three most powerful institutions in Washington DC, the Federal Reserve, the Central Intelligence Agency and CENCOM. Right? You've got the money in the brains, you've got the you got the money, you've got the brains, you got the muscle. All three of those must be brought to heel by this audience. The way we bring it to heel is you use Epstein is the tool to do it. We must use that tool. We must use it today. If we don't do it, let's just give up and go play. Let's just hang out. Right? We'll have a concert here for two days and a picnic. Speaker 0: We're not doing that. That's not why we're here. So so Steve, walk us through the mechanics. Can the president appoint a special prosecutor without congress? Speaker 1: He has to get by the way, the way because we use it, a prosecutor has to be the special prosecutor has to be confirmed by congress. But that's what we got the votes to do that. You don't need 60 you it's 51 votes. We control that. You just tell the Republican Party. We basically get online every night and bombard their offices with emails or text messages saying you must do this. Tom Fenton's a known guy. He can get confirmed. Speaker 0: Or Matt Gaetz. Speaker 1: Matt Gaetz would be the best. Speaker 0: How about Matt Gaetz? Would people like Matt Gaetz? Speaker 1: Matt Gaetz is amazing. Speaker 0: That would be a no brainer. Right? Speaker 1: I I think I think what you do I can't focus. I get too broad. I I think I think what you do is a Fenton, a special prosecutor, maybe Matt Gaetz's attorney general. Speaker 0: Yeah. If we I don't think that'll happen with with senate confirmation. But, Steven, closing your Speaker 1: Hold it. There's everybody there's not anybody if the process showed us with Hagsett and Bobby Kennedy and Tulsi, if you fix bayonets, there's nobody we can't get confirmed. Right? You put the fear of God in Joni Ernst. You put the fear of God in Tom Tillis. You put the fear of God in anybody. We can get him confirmed. Maybe Gates is better at holding the ball pin but or Gates for Fenton. He'll be ready for Speaker 0: a line change. I think Gates is right because there will be a line change at some point. Steve, in closing, going into the midterms and beyond, if the anger that I am getting from the audience on Epstein continues, what will that mean politically? Speaker 1: It'll be over, the country will be over and half of you people will be in prison. The other half will be bankrupt. That's why Speaker 0: it's all That's how important you think this is. Speaker 1: This is nothing more important. By the way, tonight at right after the 05:00 show, I'm a do a meet and greet with all of you. So I appreciate it. Speaker 0: God bless. Thank you. Speaker 1: Sure. Is Charlie Kirk the best? Is this guy the greatest warrior we got? Love you guys.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Right after Bannon/Kelly events. https://t.co/6gk6UzkNDc

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

July 15, 2025 | Charlie Kirk falls in line, says "I'm done talking about Epstein" for time being. The Plot Thickens Two days after the TPUSA event with Megyn Kelly and the show with Steve Bannon, Charlie got the call from the Trump admin to drop the subject. Charlie did not, despite saying he was done talking about it. Only 10 days ago he was still posting videos about the Epstein files and I've found him bringing it up at least 5 Times since then. He got the call after the event with Steve Bannon in July but chose to post the video 11 days ago tying Epstein to mossad and calling out the Trump admin for being complicit with the deep state if they don't investigate it. Around the same time Charlie and Steve did their event Bannon was floating the idea of running for president in 2028. Link in 🧵 (It's from the lib media but it's still worth watching).

Video Transcript AI Summary
The White House said the president's entire team would continue to work in, "lockstep." Despite a feud involving Bondi, Patel, and Bongino, Bongino was back at work, and Trump said he spoke to him earlier and thought Bongino was "in good shape" in his current position. Charlie Kirk: "Honestly, I'm done talking about Epstein... I'm gonna trust my friends in the administration... balls in their hands." Laura Ingram scolds conservatives for discussing it. Greene described the handling as "a full reversal" and Fuentes said "MAGA is dead." Kennedy warned Epstein was a sex trafficker and asked who he trafficked to and why others weren't prosecuted. Overnight, House Republicans voted against a Democrat-backed amendment to publish Epstein documents; Ralph Norman was the only Republican on the committee to vote in favor. Ro Khanna pushes the measure to force release, which would publish all documents within thirty days of enactment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The show that knows there is never a dull moment on the New York City subway. Man, look at that flooding. We're gonna get the forecast in just a few minutes. For now, I'm Ali Vitale on this Tuesday, July 15, and we'll start with the news. The Trump administration is trying to portray a united front as the president continues to face the threat of revolt from his MAGA base over the Jeffrey Epstein files. It comes after telling his supporters to not waste any more time or energy on the deceased convicted sex offender. The White House released this statement yesterday declaring that the president's entire team would continue to work in, quote, lockstep. That entire team piece is important because it comes despite the reported feud involving attorney general Pam Bondi, FBI director Kash Patel, and deputy FBI director Dan Bongino. What's more, Bongino was reportedly back at work yesterday according to CNN after he took Friday off and was rumored to have threatened to quit. CNN also reports Bongino's long term future is still uncertain at this point. Additionally, president Trump told reporters on Sunday he spoke to Bongino earlier that morning and thought Bongino was, quote, in good shape in his current position. We'll see about that, but it comes as some high profile Trump loyalists who voiced concerns over the lack of transparency regarding the Epstein files are now apparently heeding the president's orders and moving on. Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, who voiced his concern over the Epstein files a mere forty eight hours ago at the Student Action Summit in Florida, now says he's, quote, done with the matter. Speaker 1: Honestly, I'm done talking about Epstein for the time being. I'm gonna trust my friends in the administration. I'm gonna trust my friends in the government to do what needs to be done, solve it, balls in their hands. I've said plenty this last weekend. Speaker 0: Make some noise if you care about the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Speaker 1: Raise your hand if it matters a lot to you. Raise your hand. So every hand of 7,000 people. Everybody cares. It I think A lot. I said a lot. Every hand. Speaker 0: He did have a lot to say this weekend, but now he's trusting his friends in the government. Fox News host Laura Ingram, who also raised raised questions about the Epstein investigation over the weekend, is now actually scolding other conservative influencers for still discussing it as if she hadn't done so herself. Speaker 2: Now as conservative influencers were eating their own about stein, the president was stealing the show on the one year anniversary of the day he almost lost his life. He made a triumphant appearance at a global sporting event. Meanwhile, Democrats keep shooting in their own goal, stumbling from one embarrassment to the next. How many of you are satisfied you can you can clap. Satisfied with the results of the Epstein investigation. Clap. Okay. I told you to clap. You guys aren't listening. I'm not gonna grade you on a curve. So I was gonna get to that. How many of you are not satisfied with the results of the investigation? Speaker 0: Things change quick. And despite several Trump loyalists now changing their tune and falling in line, there are still some defectors that remain, at least for now. Among them, Republican congressman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, who criticized the Trump administration's handling of this case, told The New York Times, quote, it's definitely a full reversal on what was all said beforehand, and people are just not willing to accept it. Right wing influencer, Nick Fuentes, went so far as to say MAGA is dead in response to president Trump's posts, blaming Democrats for fabricating the Epstein files. Fuentes wrote on social media, quote, so now Trump is claiming the Epstein files are a Democrat hoax? LOL. And then there's Republican senator John Kennedy of Louisiana who said this to NBC News yesterday. Speaker 3: Mister Epstein was a sex trafficker. He was a sex trafficker of young women, some of whom were minors. I think it's reasonable for the American people to ask, who he sexed, trafficked these young women to, if anybody besides himself. And if there were others involved, why they haven't been prosecuted. That's a perfectly understandable question. And I think the justice department is going to have to answer it. Speaker 0: Overnight, House Republicans voted against a Democrat backed amendment that would force the justice department to release the Epstein files in full. The house rules committee voted against attaching that amendment to a cryptocurrency bill. Congressman Ralph Norman of South Carolina was actually the only Republican on that committee who actually voted in favor of it. The measure would have forced US attorney general Pam Bondi to publish all documents related to Epstein on a publicly accessible website within thirty days of it being enacted. Democrats say they expected the amendment to fail, but they plan to take advantage of Trump's turn to releasing the documents by driving a wedge between him and his base. They're gonna keep introducing that amendment or that bill, at least according to Ro Khanna, who's pushing it.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Charlie Kirk essentially accusing mossad of being the force behind the US political blackmail ring. https://t.co/xHEXqo6LPZ

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk directly tying Epstein to mossad...again. Clip from January 2024. Please help me find the FULL.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Charlie Kirk's “Security” & Ties to Israel https://t.co/zCr1z8lw4O

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

👀Charlie Kirk's “Security” and Their Ties to Israel (I'm adding “NOT SUICIDAL” to my bio) Charlie Kirk's private security was handled by a detail that sometimes included former Secret Service agents and U.S. Marines. The security team, contracted by his organization Turning Point USA, was led by former FBI agent Greg Shaffer. The internet (and possibly Shaffer himself) is now distancing him from Kirk’s security. If you search for a connection, it will tell you that Shaffer Security Group stopped working with Kirk in 2022. Despite the supposed security expertise, this is Shaffer's comment about the Kirk shooting: “We typically anticipated close-range threats...” There is no proof of any disconnection. A single AP article making that claim yesterday is the only source. You can clearly see that Charlie had the same security personnel in 2022 that he did at the shooting. The people in charge of Kirk’s security essentially did nothing to secure the area or inspect rooftops prior to or during the event, despite the fact that it would have been a simple four-man job that could have included cameras for the event. After the shooting, the crime scene was not secured, and they allowed the staff to simply pack up the area. 🧵 @HarrisonHSmith @IanCarrollShow

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵"Insider Information" @TheGrayzoneNews https://t.co/SyMmtm9Hdh

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk refused Netanyahu funding offer, was ‘frightened’ by pro-Israel forces before death, friend reveals.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Hours after shooting Full Epstein files release blocked. Spearheaded by Chuck Schumer. https://t.co/PWtN3qal9E

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

September 10th Recap | While You Were Distracted Further evidence against israel. 🕕 18:23 UTC / 1:23 PM CDT — Charlie Kirk event. 🕙 22:17 UTC / 5:17 PM CDT — Senate Republicans block release of Jeffrey Epstein–related documents. Chuck Schumer — Self proclaimed "guardian of israel". Chuck Schumer, as Senate Majority Leader, has been a key figure in blocking or advancing legislation related to Israel and other foreign policy issues in the Senate. 🧵

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵ADL creates a page about israel Kirk connection. https://t.co/onwlC2Pslg https://www.adl.👁️org/resources/article/antisemitic-and-anti-israel-conspiracy-theories-follow-fatal-shooting-charlie https://t.co/Q7eIc9pvbZ

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

The ADL officially "DEBUNKED" israel being involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Right @grok? Isn't that how it works in America? https://t.co/quU1vsvjtP

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Kirk's "antisemitism". https://t.co/EjrTUHsx3o

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

5 Times Charlie Kirk Made Antisemitic Remarks 🧵

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵TPUSA israel sub domain goes down around the same time as Charlie increases public expression of his issues with Netanyahu, the israeli government and their involvement with Epstein and political blackmail. https://t.co/w1Nl4NKn2Q

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk | Curiouser & Curiouser Around the same time frame (July) that the Megyn Kelly, Steve Bannon events happened a subdomain of TPUSA's website (israel.) was removed from the site. This page can still be seen on Wayback Machine. Charlie Kirk(or someone with the authority)removed the subdomain of the TPUSA website that was essentially Charlie backing us israel and explaining why he loves israel. Check it out yourself @waybackmachine

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Reports surface that Kirk was warned ahead of time he would be shot at an event. https://t.co/gpm1N3y5vl

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk Was Warned He Would Be "100% Killed" Before Utah Shooting

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵News outlets begin retracting old accusations of antisemitism.https://t.co/HESKojhq8k

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵NY Times FORCED to retract the statements as not Charlies statements...yet the video shows he was backing up the statement and agreeing. They're saying it wasn't him saying it but rather him repeating what someone else said. They're rewriting the narrative in real time. There is a full campaign to scrub the internet of anything anti israel that Charlie has said and boost his pro israel takes. The ADL already made a full "debunking" page. All of the past accusations of Charlie Kirks antisemitism by the ADL and media outlets are being FORCED to retract their claims.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵AJC, one of many organizations that began to attack Charlie for antisemitism around the same time he was asked by the Trump admin(or whomever it was) to stop talking about the Epstein files. July 11th https://t.co/XOQFii14xe

@AJCGlobal - American Jewish Committee

Charlie Kirk and Megyn Kelly floated the baseless conspiracy theory that Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad agent — and admitted they had no evidence. That doesn’t matter, because what people will remember is the lie. This isn’t just irresponsible. It’s a textbook example of how right-wing antisemitism spreads: through conspiracies dressed up as innocent speculation. They gave oxygen to an age-old trope of Jewish control — and in today’s climate, that’s not just offensive. It’s dangerous.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I wouldn't be surprised one bit. I am convinced based on my own sources and my own reporting on this story, he wasn't one of ours. So he was an American, which leads basically three options, MI six, Saudi or Mossad? Yep. Which one would you choose? Well, I mean it's possible that that's the reason everything is getting buried, that there is some treasure trove and it's getting buried because How many people here believe that? Raise your hand. Okay. I'd say about half half the hands think that it's being buried because of an Israeli thing. It could be. I I really don't know. And I no evidence to suggest that. I'm neither.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think there's any intel community involvement in this? Speaker 1: I wouldn't be surprised one bit. I am convinced based on my own sources and my own reporting on this story, he wasn't one of ours. Speaker 0: So he was an American, which leads basically three options, MI six, Saudi or Mossad? Yep. Which one would you choose? Speaker 1: I guess Mossad given his connection to Ghislain Maxwell. Speaker 0: So what does that mean? Speaker 1: Well, I mean it's possible that that's the reason everything is getting buried, that there is some treasure trove and it's getting buried because How many people Speaker 0: here believe that? Raise your hand. Okay. I'd say about half half the hands think that it's being buried because of an Israeli thing. Speaker 1: It could be. I I really don't know. And I Speaker 0: no evidence to suggest that. I'm Speaker 1: just Yeah. No. Me Speaker 0: neither.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Loomer attacking Charlie July 13th. https://t.co/x5Wi1rkuaF

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

I don’t ever want to hear @charliekirk11 claim he is pro-Trump ever again. After this weekend, I’d say he has revealed himself as political opportunist and I have had a front row seat to witness the mental gymnastics these last 10 years. Lately, Charlie has decided to behave like a charlatan, claiming to be pro-Trump one day while he stabs Trump in the back the next. TPUSA was only able to thrive thanks to the generosity of President Trump. On the one year anniversary of the assassination attempt on Trump’s life, Charlie hosted @ComicDaveSmith at @TPUSA’s SAS conference where Dave Smith was able to speak to a bunch of conservative youth at an organization that claims to be Pro-Trump. 3 weeks ago, Dave Smith called for President Trump to be IMPEACHED and REMOVED from office over his decision to blow up Iran’s nuclear facilities. Charlie played both sides of the Iran issue on his show as we all saw, because he wants to play to both sides of the aisle. The honorable thing to do is to have a position and actually defend it to the death instead of flip flopping. Smith said all of MAGA “should turn on Trump” and abandon him. He said this 3 weeks ago. See the clip below. 👇🏻 TPUSA is definitely not pro-Trump. If they were, they certainly aren’t anymore. Out of all of the incredible pro-Trump voices out there who support the President, Charlie decided to host Dave Smith? It really is shameful. And I am honestly just disgusted by the nonstop flip flopping on the right.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker says, "Trump listen, man. I I supported him this last year. I apologize for doing so. It was a bad calculation. At the time, it seemed like the right one." He adds, "But he should be impeached and removed for this one." He continues, "And not not on some, like, not not on some ridiculous Nancy Pelosi. Of course, the congress will never do it because they're all a bunch of, you know, corrupt hacks. This is the one thing they support. This is, like, the yeah." He reiterates, "Donald Trump should be impeached and removed for this." "All of his supporters should turn on him." "It's the absolute betrayal of every"
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump listen, man. I I supported him this last year. I apologize for doing so. It was a bad calculation. At the time, it seemed like the right one. But he should be impeached and removed for this one. And not not on some, like, not not on some ridiculous Nancy Pelosi. Of course, the congress will never do it because they're all a bunch of, you know, corrupt hacks. This is the one thing they support. This is, like, the yeah. Donald Trump should be impeached and removed for this. All of his supporters should turn on him. It's the absolute betrayal of every

@ComicDaveSmith - Dave Smith

Thank you very much @charliekirk11 for having me at the @TPUSA event today. It was a fantastic event and it’s inspiring to see so many young people who are passionate about the future of our country.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Israel still attacking Charlie..https://t.co/ZnOaU8IBOi

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Even in death Carlie Kirk can't get away from the allegations of antisemitism. Why? Really think about it. 9/11/25

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Israel Steals HALF A BILLON DOLLARS.https://t.co/yLlzVazsZM https://t.co/KXRrwWpJE7

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵US House Passes Defense Policy Bill, Including Provisions for Israel Military Aid | September 11, 2025 Gotta love them jews. The US House of Representatives on Wednesday passed the annual defense policy bill, authorizing nearly $900 billion in military spending including a slate of provisions aimed at bolstering Israel’s security. Passing by a vote of 231 to 196, largely along party lines, the bill underscores Washington’s continued military and political support for the Jewish state as it wages war against Iran’s network of terrorist proxies in the Middle East, primarily targeting Hamas in Gaza. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2025 includes more than $650 million in direct US-Israel defense cooperation programs and several new policy directives. The measures were praised by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which has been lobbying for expanded security commitments. The package includes $500 million for missile defense cooperation, including funding for the Iron Dome, David’s Sling, and Arrow systems, along with bilateral research, development, testing, and evaluation. Another $35 million is directed toward joint emerging technologies, ranging from artificial intelligence and quantum to directed energy and cybersecurity. The bill also earmarks $50 million for anti-tunneling programs and $70 million for counter-drone efforts. Beyond funding, lawmakers moved to extend the War Reserve Stockpile Authority for Israel until 2029, ensuring Israel continued access to US military equipment pre-positioned in the region. The NDAA also requires the Pentagon to provide briefings to Congress on the status of aircraft and air-launched munitions approved for delivery to Israel. Several provisions target international institutions seen as hostile to US and allied forces such as Israel. The bill directs the Pentagon and State Department to work with NATO and major non-NATO allies to block enforcement of International Criminal Court (ICC) warrants against American or allied military personnel. It also prohibits US Defense Department participation in international defense exhibitions that exclude Israeli firms, an increasingly common occurrence in Europe. In November 2024, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his former defense minister, Yoav Gallant, and now-deceased Hamas terror leader Ibrahim al-Masri (better known as Mohammed Deif) for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Gaza conflict. The ICC said there were reasonable grounds to believe Netanyahu and Gallant were criminally responsible for starvation in Gaza and the persecution of Palestinians — charges vehemently denied by Israel, which has provided significant humanitarian aid into the war-torn enclave throughout the war. Lawmakers also mandated new assessments on regional security threats. The NDAA requires studies on preventing Hamas and other groups from using tunnels or maritime routes to smuggle weapons, along with reports on the status of integrated air and missile defense across US Central Command’s area of responsibility. To deepen industrial cooperation, the bill establishes a US-Israel defense innovation field office in Israel and starts a new Defense Industrial Base Working Group to explore opportunities for greater integration between the two countries’ defense sectors. The Pentagon is also directed to continually assess the impact of foreign arms embargoes and sanctions on Israel’s military readiness. The Senate still needs to finalize its version of the defense bill and reach a consensus with the House, before the legislation can head to US President Donald Trump’s desk to be signed into law.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@Visuals3rd ...that's what I'm doing.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@Critica1Me ⚡️⚡️

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@PaulioMush Blame Loomer. He's the one that said it's always the jews.

VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 14, 2025 at 1:50 AM
Saved - September 14, 2025 at 9:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
This episode is being removed from the internet. I suspect Charlie Kirk was considering a presidential run, but his loyalty to Israel seems questionable. His security team, led by a former FBI agent, has faced criticism for their lack of preparedness during a recent shooting incident. There are claims that the team distanced themselves from Kirk, but evidence supporting this is weak. Discussions about downloading and sharing content related to these events are ongoing, with various users exchanging information and resources.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

This episode is being scrubbed form the internet. The Charlie Kirk Show November 16, 2023 Please Spread/Download/Post🧵(UPDATING)

Video Transcript AI Summary
At a Reno event, the host hailed the 'win for liberty' from 'liberation of Twitter' and Elon Musk as hero for free speech. The discussion centers on Musk's response to a tweet about an anti‑Semitic ad; his reply to commenter amid backlash. The ad shows a white father challenging his son about posting anti-Semitic content, with 'You want truth said to your face? There it is.' The artist formerly known as Eric tweets, 'Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them,' and Elon says, 'you have said the actual truth.' The host cites 'the Anti Defamation League was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter' and 'the philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country.' He concludes that labeling Musk anti‑Semite is 'sloppy... shallow... wrong and repulsive.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, everybody. Radio stations across the country. Honored to be with you. You can email us as alwaysfreedom@CharlieKirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Excellent event last evening in Reno, Nevada. It's great to see so many of you. I cannot emphasize enough. The win for liberty, the win for humanity that the liberation of Twitter has meant for all of us. It's remarkable. Liberating Twitter from what it once us was to what it is now is a win for the narrative. It's a win for truth. It's a win as we try to fight back against this uniparty regime, the tyrants, and the authoritarian dictators that are running the country. Elon Musk, even if they shut down Twitter today, will go down as a major hero for allowing us to be able to speak, to question narratives, to get the truth out. Elon Musk got himself in a little bit of trouble yesterday. Elon Musk responded to a tweet that I actually don't think the tweet is that smart. I think one part of it is legit. But I think another part of it is not so great. But the essence of what Elon was responding to is a major thought crime in America. That the world's wealthiest man would comment on this is historic. So here's the tweet, and it's responding to a video. And the video was basically, a white father with his white son saying to his son, hey, you think that, you know, you're posting online all this anti Semitic stuff. Why don't you go and say this to these Jewish families face? Pretty powerful advertisement. This is the ad. Okay? It's about a minute long. It's a powerful ad. And then a person on Twitter responded to this advertisement, and then Elon responded to the person responding to the advertisement. It's important. Bear with us. Because right now, Elon Musk is being targeted like never before. Elon Musk was supposed to speak at a summit today, and he's been canceled. They don't wanna hear from Elon Musk because they are tarring and feathering him as an anti Semite. They've come after this program for calling us anti Semites. They're coming after Elon Musk for calling, they're calling him an anti Semite. So here's the advertisement. It's a powerful ad. Play cut 79. Speaker 1: I saw what you've been posting. Hitler was right. I didn't teach you that. You hide behind your screen, spewing all this hatred and ugliness. You got something they wanna say? Get out of the truck and say it to their faces. Speaker 0: Okay. So that that advertisement then was responded to by this person, the artist formerly known as Eric. Quote, okay. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. I am deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest swear word, let's just say tiniest crap, now about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. You want truth said to your face? There it is. Now let me just say, this is not is not a very well written tweet. I said it's very confusing. I'll go through what they're basically saying here. Half of this tweet is true, half of it I don't like. You want the truth said to your face? There it is. Elon responds and he says, you have said the actual truth. Now we don't know what part Elon is saying is the actual truth. So let's go through this. Again, it's double negatives and misuse of the word disinterested. It's a strange tweet that Elon pinpointed on here. But the first part is absolutely true. Let's go to this. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. Now I don't like generalizations. Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true the Anti Defamation League was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left wing anti white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke, and it wasn't just ADL. It was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges. Right? Mark Rowan, Leon Kaufman. Can we get that full list? It's very powerful. The part of the so that's totally true. And by way, Tucker Carlson reinforces this. So I'm gonna kinda it was quite a day on the Internet. Tucker Carlson was inter interviewing Candace Owens. We have Candace Owens coming up next hour, and Tucker Carlson mentions that Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. We said this, by the way, last week, and people came after us. We came we actually said it in a different way. We said, I'm glad that Jewish Americans are reconsidering their financing of cultural Marxism, and people misunderstood it intentionally and slandered us as being anti Semites. But listen to this: Tucker Carlson is completely correct by saying this, that the philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country. Play cut 92. Speaker 2: However, then I thought, well, wait a second. If the biggest donors at, say, Harvard have decided, well, we're gonna shut it down now. Where were you the last ten years when Speaker 1: they're before? Speaker 2: As Jenna said, you were allowing this, and then I found myself really hating those people, actually. That you're okay with that? On what grounds were you okay with that? Speaker 1: And I this is what I've been trying to explain to the pro Israel lobby that what you were seeing is lack of support. It's people that are asking the question is where were you Yeah. As we have endured all of this. You were paying Speaker 2: for it, actually. Speaker 1: Right. You were Speaker 2: paying for it. Speaker 1: You were you were paying for it. Speaker 2: You calling my children immoral for their skin color. You paid for that. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I So Speaker 2: why shouldn't I be mad at you? I don't understand. Speaker 0: So what what Tucker is saying is similar to part of the tweet that Elon isolated. That is true. That let's just say liberals, but that includes Jewish financiers of liberal causes didn't really care about University of Chicago having courses that saying, you know, the problem with whiteness. They didn't really care about American Express saying that we must eliminate whiteness. They didn't, in fact, they were supportive of it. A lot of liberals were okay with critical race theory, diversity, equity, inclusion. ADL went all in on the BLM type narrative, and ADL is one of many different organizations that were perfectly fine with the growing anti white wave. Now, to be clear, many of these Jews did not fully understand what they were financing. Their intentions were probably pretty good. As we've said, intentions mean next to nothing here. And I'm sure some of the intentions weren't so good, but let's just attention to the side. I'm not that interested in intentions. I'm interested in actions. Okay? Intentions are very hard to pinpoint. We get too caught up in the conservative movement on intentions. I learned this from the great Dennis Prager, who says stop focusing on intentions, focus on the actions. It's a much better way to judge whether or not something is right or wrong. Intentions, as I've said before, and there's a video that went viral, the Nazis thought they were doing good. They convinced themselves that they were doing good, when in reality, they were doing some of the greatest evil in the history of the species. So, Hamas thinks they're doing good. I could go through all this, but they're doing evil. So I'm not convinced that somebody's intentions are what matter. Many Jewish financiers culturally given money to George Washington University, Columbia, Yale, Dartmouth over and over and over again, hundreds of millions of dollars, billions of dollars, financing many nonprofits that many of them are now recognizing and realizing this was a bad idea. So I'm gonna build this out because the second part of the tweet I don't like, and it ties into some news that is not so good for AOC. It's not good for Ayanna Pressley. I'm gonna isolate that in just a second. But let me just say before I talk about my Patriot supply. It is sloppy. It is shallow. It is wrong and repulsive to call a great man Elon Musk an anti Semite. It cheapens the label of anti Semitism. It is not good for anybody.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵https://t.co/2TtdJ11qAG

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Good Goys Gone Bad: Charlie Kirk Compilation Charlie didn't turn on israel- but israel turned on Charlie. The more I look into it the more I get the feeling he was considering running for president at some point and he's clearly not directly loyal to the Netanyahu crew.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This transcript covers claims that Jewish donors have funded open border neoliberal policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits. "This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now it's coming for Jews, and they're like, what on earth happened?" It also cites "not just the colleges... It's Hollywood" and labels Epstein as "the first big scandal" with calls to "unseal all the Epstein documents in the Southern District Of New York" and to reveal "Everything." It notes "Alexander Acosta ... he was told to treat Epstein carefully because he was an intel asset" and asks "MI six, Saudi, or Mossad?" Beebe's claim: "You can't be MAGA if you're anti Israel." It cites polling: GOP "76%," Dems "36%," Now "eight%." It warns "This is the closest thing to the Holocaust that any of us have lived through" and urges Israel to "seek justice" without turning it into a regional war.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do, because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open border neoliberal quasi Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now it's coming for Jews, and they're like, what on earth happened? And it's not just the colleges. It's the nonprofits. It's the movies. It's Hollywood. It's all of it. It's like time for you guys to wake up and say no more. Draw a line in the sand. I don't care if you hate me. Why don't you update them, Megan? Speaker 1: Well, this is the first big scandal, I'd say, of the Trump administration that's on team rational. It's not a fake media scandal like the left tries to create for president Trump every other day. It's one of the right's own making, and it's not going well. And it has to do with Jeffrey Epstein. Yeah. Let let me just ask you. Make some noise if you care about the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Speaker 0: Raise your hand if it matters a lot to you. Raise your hand. So every hand of 7,000 people. Speaker 1: Everybody cares. It I think A lot. Speaker 0: I said a lot. Every hand. I'm open to it. If that's true, why don't you just tell us the prisoners' names who are on the same cell block as Jeffrey Epstein? Speaker 1: There's a lot. Speaker 0: No. That's BS. I'm sorry. The president The United States figured out whether they have HIPAA for federal prisoners. Tell us I mean, tell us who the other prisoners were if no one had access to it because all of a sudden, if we find out some of these prisoners had suspicious intel ties. Speaker 1: It's funny because you look back at the the past, Dan and Cash talked about Epstein all the time when they were in my business that Speaker 0: hasn't been a shtick of mine. Speaker 1: Mine neither. Mine neither. I I talked about myself. Right? Same. Same. But I am a lawyer by training, and I can smell BS when it's being shoveled to me. And it's very obvious to me right now that we've got spinners trying to mess with us in Washington on a story that is important, and here's why. Yes. Obviously, child sexual abuse matters. And if we have some ring of pedophiles running around, I mean, outside of Hollywood, we need to know. One of the main reasons that we voted Trump in was because we wanted real answers on real stories, and we didn't wanna be BSed anymore with a bunch of nonsense from our government that treated us like a bunch of stooges. Speaker 0: What is the one two three sequencing? Press conference, you would get rid of Bondi. What else to get us back on track towards transparency? I think the DOJ should immediately move to unseal all the Epstein documents in the Southern District Of New York. Speaker 1: Yeah. Everything. Everything except I think every solitary. Speaker 0: I think every file should be released to the public the same way as the JFK files. Let the American people decide. Do you think there's any intel community involvement in this? Speaker 1: I wouldn't be surprised one bit. I am convinced based on my own sources and my own reporting on this story, he wasn't one of ours. Speaker 0: So he was an American, which leads basically three options. MI six, Saudi, or Mossad? Yep. Which one would you choose? Speaker 1: I guess Mossad, given his connection to Ghislain Maxwell. So Speaker 0: what does that mean? Speaker 1: Well, I mean, it's possible that that's the reason everything's getting buried, that there is some treasure trove, and it's getting buried because Speaker 0: How many people here believe that? Raise your hand. Speaker 1: That was Well a fishy answer. Speaker 0: And, Megan, remember, Alexander Acosta in 02/2007, he said he was told to treat Epstein carefully because he was an intel asset. That was that was one of Trump's cabinet secretaries who was literally a US attorney three hours from here Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: In Florida. He said that himself. He fully No. Again, I don't wanna I don't wanna feed into any of the, let's just say, speculative theories. But Alexander Acosta himself talked about Intel Asset. Yep. And you have to wonder that the timing of all this. Sunday night so you have the big beautiful bill. You have Independence Day weekend. Why are you doing this on a Sunday night? Was it Bury it. But you don't bury things on Sunday nights. Speaker 1: You do on a holiday weekend. You do. Yeah. Color away. They're traveling back from the Speaker 2: beach on Sunday night. They're dealing with traffic. They knew they were too smart to to think that they could get away with doing it on a Saturday night. Speaker 0: No. No. No. But he'll tell the truth and we will lose we will be like, if Bongino can't go and fight and solve this thing, then, like, I mean, what are we doing here? Speaker 1: I know. Speaker 0: Right? If Dan Bongino, who's like one of the greatest patriots we have Yep. Cannot go and reform the FBI with Kash Patel after we win a popular vote majority Right. Then I'm not I'm like, I will never give up, but I know for millions of people that will be met with just a sigh of cynicism. Speaker 3: The last I heard, Israel already controls something 40 to 50% of the territory in Gaza City. They've been warning people to get out for at least a couple of weeks now. Hamas have been stopping people at checkpoints and turning them back and shooting them if they don't stay in the city to be used as human shields by Hamas. So that's the current situation on the ground. Speaker 0: What other feedback or criticism would you have about this situation? I I know that it's impossible for anyone to listen to everything that you ever say, but looking at this from a American perspective, what else would you say things could have been handled differently? Maybe on the PR front, maybe also just on a a conduct front. Where where would you say as an outsider with things that could have been handled better, more efficiently, or with more precision? Author Ben Shapiro, author of Lions and Scavengers. We're gonna get to that in a second. I have one or two other questions on Israel. I think it's very important for our audience to hear this, though, because there is a an incessant campaign. And one thing a friend said to me interestingly, which is, okay, Charlie, we've pushed back against the media on COVID, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border, on so, like, maybe we should also ask a question. Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years. So, Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse. Some people in the Israeli government are saying again, it's all over the place. Right? You have opinions all over. In your opinion, what would a good outcome five years from now be, and how does one respond to the claims of ethnic cleansing? Speaker 3: As far as your earlier question about what we believe from the media, one of the things that I find kind of astonishing in in some of the folks on the right who are highly critical of Israel is actually the the lack of credit the the lack of skepticism when it comes to legacy media. Legacy media are radically anti Israel overall. The New York Times can can certainly not be accused of being a pro Israel outlet. It'd be very difficult to make the accusation that the the Associated Press, which has wore hand in glove with Kamas for years or Reuters, that the these are these are wildly pro Israel outlets. And yet when it comes to the reporting, it seems to be sort of the the opposite. So the the perception of the legacy media is, like, owned by the Jews. Speaker 0: I was gonna say Ben. I'm pro Israel. You Jews own the media, Ben. So, I mean, come on. As you could tell by all the wonderful headlines you guys get. Speaker 3: Well, I mean, dude, the accusation that that we own the media has not prevented, you know, the Daily Wire from from employing people who radically disagree with me on all of these matters. I mean, I don't agree with Matt Walsh on foreign policy. Matt, obviously, is a major host over at Daily Wire. And that's just my shop when I'm I'm I'm overtly pro Israel. Right? I I'm not making any bones about this. I'm a Jew, and I'm a Zionist. I'm not gonna pretend that that to to say otherwise would be absolutely silly. To to suggest that that a some sort of atheistic Jewish person by birth who does not care about Judaism or Israel owning the New York Times means the New York Times is pro Israelis to ignore literally every bit of coverage they have ever done for my entire lifetime. Speaker 0: We we we're we're running out of time here. But just last question on this, Ben. I know this might be a a tougher question, but Beebe said, quote, I didn't like how he said this. I'll be honest. You can't be MAGA if you're anti Israel. I don't like it for a couple reasons. How how did you how did you analyze that statement from Beebe? Speaker 3: I mean and I I think that there is the ungenerous way of interpreting that and then the generous way of interpreting that. So ethnic cleansing, the idea presumably that that population movement is equivalent to ethnic cleansing. I think ethnic cleansing is a term that that's been fairly recently coined to describe population movement during war. And the reality is that's been ongoing for literally all of human history. The idea that that Israel is, quote, unquote, forcing people out of the Gaza Strip, that is not the stated policy of the Israeli government. The idea is if people want to leave, they can, but they're not being forced to leave. Again, moving people out of heavily urbanized areas that are honeycombed with terrorist booby traps pretty much everywhere is not the same thing as, quote, unquote, ethnic cleansing. And I think that ethnic cleansing is is very often used as sort of a a softer form of of the genocide attack. The idea being that Israel is trying to kill everyone, which, of course, is not true. The ungenerous way is to suggest that you have to hold a particular position on every Israeli governmental activity in order to in order to be MAGA, which, of course, is not true. I mean, you can disagree from the right or from the left with with Bibi's policies, and and you can still be plenty MAGA. I think the idea that that Bibi is putting out there is that if you are taking Hamas' side against Israel in a conflict, it is very difficult to align that with the with the stated positions of the Trump administration or what president Trump himself is doing right now. Speaker 1: You you Speaker 3: can't and that much, I certainly is true. Speaker 0: You cannot look. I I think you can have disagreements on Israel and still be MAGA, obviously. You should be America first. But if you're pro Hamas, you're something darker. Speaker 1: You and I are both supporters of Israel and Yeah. Have defended Israel since the beginning of this conflict and and spoken out about the antisemitism that has erupted on these college campuses many, many, many, many times. And something's happening, though, with this whole debate that is really bothering me, and I wonder if you're feeling it too. So I I mean, I genuinely believe you'd be hard pressed to find somebody in the public eye who's been as outspoken a defender of not every move Israel's taken in the war, but of Israel's right to defend itself and of the the just backward awfulness that we've been seeing on college campuses and the backlash against American Jews, then yours truly. I mean, I have been at the pointy end of the spear on this. And I Speaker 0: completely agree with that. Speaker 1: And I it was all heartfelt, and it remains heartfelt. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: However, however, I my contention here is that some in the pro Israel camp are so knee jerk about calling you antisemitic or getting deeply offended if you say anything that doesn't align with their narrative that it undermines their own cause. And I have to tell you, I find it very irritating because I do feel like some of us have earned the right to have some credibility on the subject of Israel and don't wanna be called those names when we have some mild pushback on some of the overreaches, whether it's, you know, whether they're winning or losing the propaganda war right now. And my contention is they've begun to lose it. And I realize it's propaganda coming at us from Hamas, but they their their numbers have turned. Here in America, they've turned. Not so much with Republicans, a little bit with Republicans, but but completely with the Democrat party and with independents. They they have shifted mightily from at least double digits highs to single digit lows now with the with when it comes to approval. And, also, with respect to you and I speculated about this at the Turning Point event, whether the possibility of Jeffrey Epstein possibly being a Mossad agent or asset or affiliated with, that's been turned around on me too to you must be anti Semitic. What the hell? That's such bullshit. Speaker 0: I Speaker 1: The same people who say, you can criticize Israel. That's fine. We won't call you anti Semitic if you criticize Israel. Turn around immediately and say, you're anti Semitic for even raising that. I completely reject that, and I've raised this as a pushback against my friends on that particular strain of the aisle to watch it because you don't wanna alienate people who are openly your friends by going nuts in your crackdowns on mild pushback on anything related to Israel. Now you Speaker 0: take it. I'm so I'm I'm so glad you brought this up. And I would second that. Megan, I think I have a bulletproof resume showing my defense of Israel both on campus, on social media, to to great, you know, let's just say mockery and scorn at times where because I believe it. Right? I I believe in the scriptural land rights given to Israel. I believe in fulfillment of prophecy. And again, I'm not a theologian, but I'm a Christian. My life was changed in Israel. The spiritual energy is so amazing there. I I want them to win. I've said that repeatedly. Same. And however, Megan, you're hitting on something very potent and important. Now let me first say, I don't wanna judge an entire group because there's been many people in the per Israel world that have been very sweet, very kind, very nuanced, very Charlie. You know, you're with us. You don't have to agree all the time. However, and I and I will say this, the behavior by a lot, both privately and publicly, are pushing people like you and me away. Not like we're gonna be pro Hamas. Not like we're gonna but we're like, honestly, the way you are treating me is so repulsive. I have text messages, Megan, calling me an anti Semite. I am learning biblical Hebrew and writing a book on the Shabbat. I honor the Shabbat, literally the Jewish Sabbath. I visit Israel and fight for it. And there's another article out in the Times of Israel today. I could read it on air. I was just reading before I got on. Charlie, what are you doing? Like, why are you what am I doing? I'm sorry. Like, let's just take a step back here. Like, I'm an American citizen. Yes. I want Israel to win. Yes. I'm a Christian. But, like, the sum of the mess and you saw I mean, you've seen how I've been treated, Megan, by some, not all, by some. Speaker 1: No. It's very irritating. It's it's been so unfair. They they were coming after you after a turning point for among other things. They had Dave Smith there. Dave Smith isn't allowed to criticize Israel. You had both sides. The the Israeli side was overrepresented. Speaker 0: No. You're not allowed to. It's even worse than that. Again, I would just wanna repeat for the fifth time. I love Israel. I want Israel to win. But my moral character is now being put into question, Megan. Not my decisions. Not like, hey. Are you doing this? Is it smart or is it dumb? But no. I am a bad person if I do this. And it's a I I could go I mean, I you saw it, Megan. It was trending on Twitter. Thousands of tweets and text messages. And if I were to be charitable and generous, I will say, the people that are attacking me are in a hyperparanoid state because they're at war, and war tends to make things black and white, and you're a hammer looking for a nail. So I'm trying to be charitable, Megan. Literally, I'm trying to cut as much slack as I can. Right? They go, okay. What would it be like if all of a sudden I'm starting to see a pattern of behavior similar to what my grandparents saw in nineteen thirties Germany online? How would I behave? So that's like my charitable kind of over compensation spirit. At the same time, I'm like, but you're it's it's not defensible to be dumb. Right? Yeah. Speaker 1: So And it's offensive. It's offensive to those of us who have been out there defending them in in many instances against critics on our own side. And now you have a couple of comments like, well, what about this? Well, has it gone on too long? Like, is it time to wrap it up? And the thing about Epstein is just so bizarre. I don't know who he was an agent for. It might have been Israel or an asset, or it might have been nobody, but we're allowed to speculate about that. It's like there's some rule. You can't go there when it comes to Israel. Speaker 0: Well, you and I believe that we're Americans and Americans first, Period. End of story. We are citizens of this nation. Okay? That's Israel, we have funded. We have supported. And they're up against a sea of Islamic totalitarianism, and we should be cheering for them. Right? Because they're up against barbarians and and monsters, and we want them to win. However, here is Megan Kelly and Charlie Kirk combined probably 30,000,000 social media followers, like pretty right? And you and I have been holding this down, and you you probably get the negative, oh, you're just shilling for Israel. I'm like, okay. I'm gonna do what's right regardless of the feedback. Right? But then all of a sudden, like, I host a person that I I moderate the debate of, my dear. Right? Right. And I give equal time to Josh Hammer, equal time to a pro Israel advocate, and my moral character is being put into question. And so I I just I think it's a hyper paranoid, like, we're just gonna try to we're we're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice, but it goes to the point where if, for example, if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan? Speaker 1: It that's not right. Wrong headed. I I'll tell you this for me. I got some blowback after saying Mossad possibilities with Epstein, a comment behind which I stand. I mean, I really and I've, of course, reported what Alan Dershowitz has said as his lawyer. He says I think he would have told me. He didn't say he had any of those connections. I hear all that. That doesn't mean it's not true. I think all these things should be explored. It's one of the many things that should be explored around Epstein. But saying that and also saying he might be a US asset, etcetera, doesn't make you anti Semitic. That's fucking crazy. And then we get to last week, I go on Piers Piers Morgan. Right? So I go on Piers Morgan last week, and I don't talk about Israel a lot on this show. I just like, covering the day to day of a conflict like this is not my thing. It's not what we do here at the Megan Kelly show. We haven't done it for Ukraine. We haven't done it for Israel. We haven't done it for a lot of conflicts, but we'll talk about it when big things happen. So Piers talks about it a lot. Piers asked me it was a very interesting kinda culture study. So he asked me about the the photos of the starving children out of Gaza. And I said a couple of things, both of which got a fair amount of pickup. Alright. So first, this is what I said about the photos. Listen to Sop 10. Well, I'm always reluctant to put too much stock in the images coming out of Gaza, that that phrase, because they're manipulated, and they're masters of propaganda, and they're fine having their own children starve just as long as they can put them on camera and show them off to the world. That that's Hamas. And, frankly, it's lot of Palestinians, so I'm very skeptical of taking those images at face value and saying it's Israel's fault. Okay. So that clip gets circulating Speaker 0: I'm with you on that. Speaker 1: A mill a million times by my Israeli friends and my Jewish friends online. Like, go, Megan. Yeah. Okay. Great. Cool. Cool. Cool. Yeah. She's right on. Look at her you know, speak truth to Piers. And then Piers released as a as a separate clip my follow-up to that comment. Okay? And and here's that. Speaker 0: Not a lot of nuance, Megan. It's only tribalism. Speaker 1: That's right. So here's sod 11. Israel, whether it realizes it or not, has made itself the villain of the world in in letting this thing go go on so long. They have lost support amongst their dearest friends. And even the entire Democrat party here in The United States has turned against them, and they're losing Republicans by the day here in America, which is their most important ally. So whether the fight continues to be just or not is almost irrelevant. As Trump said when he was running this time last year, not yet elected, time to wrap it up. And that's how I feel too. And I've given Israel a long berth. I fully understand as an American who was attacked on 09/11, my country was that, you know, when you attack The United States and you kill thousands of our citizens, and Israel was in this position on 10/07, it's fine to respond, and it doesn't have to be proportionate. Whoever said it has to be proportionate. But what Israel's doing now is losing its standing with the rest of the world. It's starting to lose too even with its closest friends, its moral reputation, its moral, high ground. And, as Trump said a year ago, time to wrap it up. Cue Well said. The 25 text messages from people I know, like friends who are pro Israel. Like, I'm so sad that you've left us. I'm so sad you let's debate it. You know, many Jewish, advocates think, let me come on your show, and we'll debate. There's nothing to debate. I'm on Israel's side. Just stop. Me observing Speaker 0: I totally agree. Speaker 1: That you're losing the propaganda war and that this has gone on for about two years now. And look. I mean, I pulled the stats. Support for Israel's military action in Gaza by party ID. GOP in June 2024, 76%. Now 71, so they lost 5%. Dems in October 2023, 36%. Now it's at eight. Independence, October 2023, it was 47%. Now it's 25%. You go under 35, you have almost zero support across The United States, your closest ally. I I see what's happening, and it's my job to comment honestly on it. But I am sick of being lectured on, like, you you have to see it exactly as we see it and support everything, or you're you're against us. Speaker 0: So so this is so important, Megan. And, again, I don't want not every you cannot say everyone in the pros are and I don't say it acts that way. But I Right. I got texts about you, Megan. Sam, why is Megan, like, doing the bidding of Hamas? I was like, what are you talking about? Megan's the best. Like, what she's amazing. And I said, why are you texting me about Megan? And I I I at that point and so this is what they don't understand. You and I, Megan, and Tucker is in the same category, and they've tried to go after Tucker. Yeah. Is that the and and the more you attack our moral character, the actually, the more we're gonna double down in the direction because 100%. I don't do it that way. Okay? Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Like, when tell me I'm wrong. Cool. Tell me if I've got my facts wrong. By the way, on the Epstein thing, Naftali Bennett says he was an Epstein agent. We have to be pursuers of truth. They've denied it. Fine. Let's keep digging. Okay. Fine. But the the the the thing that I don't think I think is being lost is, like, on some part of the population, you can scold them into silence. Right? But if I have any deviation of a purity test, any deviation whatsoever, such as hosting a focus group, right, Megan, with a bunch of our students that went viral, having Dave Smith or Tucker at my event, it is all of a sudden, oh, Charlie is a, he's he's no longer with us and all that. So wait a second. What do you mean? What does with us mean exactly? Right? Mhmm. I'm an American. Okay? Like, I I I represent this country, and I I don't even understand that paradigm. But, Megan, I think you would agree at this. I wanna make sure we fast, like, really zero in on this. Personality types like you, myself, and Tucker, the more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question, which is not isolated. Right? I'm Megan, it'll be one thing if it was one text or two text. It is dozens of texts. Yes. Then we start to say, hold the boat here. And and to be fair, some of my really good Jewish friends are like, that's not all of us. It's all. But these are leaders too though. Right? These are these are stakeholders. Right? And so look. I I'm I'm I'm afraid because again, I want civilization to win. I want the West to win. I don't want the Islam of fascist barbarians to storm the gates of Jerusalem. I want the holy sites protected. I believe in the holy land. I love that Jesus walked on water there and rose from the dead and preached in the, the Mount Of Beatitudes. Like, I I feel the connection to Israel. And I but at the same time simultaneously, when the hostile reaction is that now Meghan and Charlie are enemies. Right. Boy, I'll tell you. Like, you're you're you're you're you're gonna you're not gonna I won't say lose, but you will weaken and just basically deflate two of your strongest advocates if that continues. Speaker 1: Right. And it to me, I laugh because it's like, I've been bullied by the best of them. The best. And it it didn't work, and it's not going to work with them. And the more you try to tell me I can't criticize Israel, the more likely I am to do it, to focus on exactly what you're doing. Right? Like, what what are you doing that you're so defensive? You don't own me. I don't I don't take $1 of money from any Jewish affiliated group. That's not that's never been what my what my show's model. Take you know, Cozy Earth is my sponsor. People like Genucel. Those are the people I take. And I probably would feel reluctant to criticize Genucel, which is a great product, so I probably wouldn't do it anyway. My point is simply, I have my honest opinions, which is why I had credibility for the two years I've been defending them. Right? And I still have that credibility, and I don't need lectures from my friends who are more pro Israel than I am or who are just American Jewish people who are concerned about what's happening. I don't need lectures on my coverage. Okay? I'll call it like I see it. And you have no right to come on this show and demand a debate with me because I've said something you disagree with. It's my show and I'll decide the coverage we do here. Speaker 2: I just have way too many questions that makes me think about what the motives are. And if we go dark, I'll put all those things out there. Yeah. How did how did these guys not know this was taking place? Speaker 0: So I've been in Israel many times. The whole country is a fortress. When I first heard this story, I still had the same gut instinct that I did initially. I find this very hard to believe. I've been to that Gaza border. You you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with an AR 15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier. Right? The whole country is surveilled. And so let me just kind of go through this. We don't talk about Israeli politics very often, and most Americans don't know this. The last nine months, Israel was on the brink of civil war. It's not an exaggeration. This judicial stuff, there were there were hundreds of thousands of Israelis taking to the streets because Bibi Netanyahu was basically redefining the Israeli constitution. That's not an exaggeration. Right? He said the judicial branch has too much power. There were protests planned this week against Netanyahu where they anticipated tens of thousands of people to take to the streets. That's all gone, Patrick. Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead. I'm not I'm not willing to say to go so far that saying that Netanyahu knew or there was intelligence here, but I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hours? I don't believe it. Israel's the side of New Jersey. When I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it's forty five minutes. Speaker 1: Wow. Speaker 0: Six hours. They're livestreaming the killing of Jews. Was did somebody in the government say stand down? That is a legitimate non conspiracy question. The whole country is the IDF. The whole country is. Yeah. And you're trying to tell me that they're going to concerts and kibbutzes and schools and by reports, six hours. Let's say it's three hours. That's suspect. Go ahead, Rob. Speaker 4: It's also not like a right wing reporting. This is from the New York Times. The long wait for help as massacre unfolds in Israel. I can't think of a more liberal news outlet than New York Speaker 0: Times. And and by the way, I I'm actually very pro Israel. So let me be very I mean Mhmm. So I'm not exactly I think we all are. No. No. I just wanna make sure my position is clear here. But I would so Patrick, there are other explanations. It's possible that the Netanyahu government was double crossed by bad agents. Okay? That's dark, but it's not as dark as what we're talking about. Okay? Another aspect is that Netanyahu might have traitors in his government, like legitimate traitors that have infiltrated. I was texting with some senior people in the IDF and they said, Charlie, can't say too much, but let's just say the same problem you have with the left in America we have here in Israel. So there's something to think about. Just something to think about, right? Is that maybe there are some people within those intel agencies that aren't as sympathetic. Or maybe, Patrick, maybe they might have gotten a tip, they might have gotten whispers, but no one thought it would be 1,200 Jews dead. That's a potential, right? Because here's the essence of it. The essence is this: this is the closest thing to the Holocaust that any of us have lived through. But the fact is now Bibi and the Israeli hard right government has a mandate I've to be careful the way I say this to they're going to try to ethnically cleanse Gaza. I mean, that's and I don't use that term lightly. Okay? They're talking about basically removing 2,500,000 people from there. Okay? And honestly, they have a mandate to go seek justice and revenge. They do. There is This idea that they need to have a truce or a peace treaty, that's morally crap after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets. But there are some serious questions here, Patrick. And let me tell you, my pattern recognition over the last five years has become pretty sharp. COVID, Maui fires, you know, Epstein. When I see a story and it doesn't click, we're our guts are usually right. I just want to be very sorry to interrupt. I'm saying that's what they're going to be accused of. If there are some people in public life in Israel that Patrick, what did your pilot guy say? I want only Jews in Israel. Right? Okay. That is a form of ethnically cleansing because 20% of Israel is Arab. Correct. Mean, look, here so let me also make sure I criticize both sides. Okay? So I'm gonna criticize the people that, you know, do the paragliding and it's sick. Lindsey Graham is an irresponsible lawmaker for what he's saying. Bombing Iranian oil depots? This thing could get wildly out of control very, very quickly. The last thing America needs is a kinetic war against Iran, an 87,000,000 person country that has a pretty fierce fighting spirit, a country at five times the size of Iraq. Five times the size of Iraq. We're gonna go start bombing oil depots. Yeah. That could get Russia further involved, China involved. Yeah. Look. The Armageddon situation is that for Israel, the Armageddon situation is that they overreact so much that they lose their Arab neutrality. Right now, they have neutrality with Egypt. If they overreact, they could lose that. They have warm conversations. I won't say a peace deal yet with Saudi Arabia. They could lose that. Jordan plays ball because America demands they play ball. They could lose that. Syria, Bashar al Assad, he acts as if it doesn't exist, but that could change in a moment's notice. Right? Lebanon via Hezbollah is already there. They could be all of a sudden dealing with a 15 country invasion of Speaker 2: Israel. Can they handle that? Speaker 0: They have in the past. I mean, the the Six Day War, the Yom Kippur War. The Yom Kippur War, for example, they were invaded from every direction. At the the Balfour declaration, when they were came a country in 1948, every Arab country declared war on them. Yeah. And and they were they almost lost the country. And to their credit, they held it off, and they earned the right to be Israel. I I I The women have no rights The answer is it shouldn't be a top priority of the American government because we have so many problems here to execute a CIA coup d'etat in another country. You have to put sanctions on. You have to put them in check. You have to try to, in my personal opinion, allow Israel to seek justice. At the same time, you cannot allow this to turn into a regional broader war. You know why? Because the adult America is gonna have to come clean it up. That's why. If we allow if we just kinda say, oh, it doesn't this thing turns into a regional conflict, we're gonna have more troops on the ground, and we're gonna have to go clean up this mess, as Trump calls it, in the region of sand and death while our own country is disintegrating and collapsing.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵https://t.co/HD63I7jTs5

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

The Charlie Kirk Show November 16, 2023 | FULL Please Spread/Download/Post

Video Transcript AI Summary
Topics covered include Newsom in China, Musk accused of antisemitism over a tweet, with Musk defending that claim; AIPAC's pledge to spend 100 million dollars to defeat the squad; a realignment of white working-class and minority voters; the idea that Twitter is the incubator of elite opinion and TikTok is the incubator of idiocy for generation Z; Seamus Brunner's Controllogarchs alleging Gates' food patents and Soros and Buffett profiting from abortion through Cayman shell companies, plus AI and CBDCs as threats; the FCC's digital discrimination order on a three two party line vote and its implications for broadband deployment; the first prosecution of its kind under 18 USC 241 resulting in seven months' prison for Douglas Mackey; Candace Owens on Israel, Ben Shapiro dispute; Heather McDonald on race/crime statistics.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Charlie Kirk show begins in one minute. The Charlie Kirk show begins in thirty seconds. The Charlie Kirk show begins in ten seconds. Speaker 1: The Charlie Kirk show starts now. Speaker 0: But today was supposed to be Gavin Newsom's day. After a romantic first date in Beijing where Gia showed Gavin his exquisite birds, intertwined trees, custom toboggans, Gavin thought he was a shoo in for a second date. She was flying into Gavin's hometown, San Francisco. And when Gavin found out, he grabbed the broom and cleaned up. Sorry, vagrants. I have a date. He waited for Chi at the airport, marveled at him as he descended onto the tarmac. And the way Gavin looked at Chi was kinda like how Taylor Swift looks at Travis Kelce. Gavin was ready to take the relationship to the next level until he found out there was someone else, Joe Biden. The president flew in on Air Force One. Now Newsom had competition. When Chi saw Joe, they couldn't keep their hands off each other. As Joe likes to brag, he spent more time with Chi than anyone else. Not to mention the fact that Chi's guys bribed the Biden family. The chemistry was unmistakable. Speaker 2: I've never doubted what you've told me in terms of your candid nature in which you speak. Speaker 3: I still remember our interactions very vividly, and it always gives me a lot of thoughts. Speaker 4: Whatever stage of development it may reach, China will never pursue hegemony or expansion and will never impose its will on others. China does not seek spheres of influence and will not fight a cold war or a hot war with anyone. China will remain committed to dialogue and impose confrontation and build partnerships instead of alliances. It will continue to pursue a mutually beneficial strategy of opening up. The modernization we are pursuing is not for China alone. We are ready to work with all countries to advance global modernization featuring peaceful development, mutually beneficial cooperation, and common prosperity, and to build a community with a shared future for mankind. Speaker 5: Let's talk about our dependence on China. Today, we're actually talking about Xi Jinping, picking on Donald Trump's word vermin to talk about that status quo. You know what's vermin? What's running around San Francisco on a given day before Gavin Newsom cleaned it up on a dime to roll out the red carpet for Xi Jinping. If he could do that for Xi Jinping, he could have done it on ordinary day, and yet we're here sitting talking not about the substance of that, but on one word that Donald Trump said in some speech in Miami. This is what's wrong with the mainstream media. Focus on the substance, and let's have an actual policy debate rather than talking to a presidential candidate instead of the policy substance of what's actually going on in the country, picking on some word that Donald Trump said on a certain day and asking me for comment on it. Speaker 6: You see, we're in a very important time in our nation's history. You look around in this room. Don't give me this nonsense that Americans are giving up. That is not true. Okay, get your tickets. Amfest.com. Amfst.com. Amfest.com. Huge speakers to be announced tomorrow. Mass of speakers. Can't wait to share that all with you. Excellent event last evening in Reno, Nevada. Really great people. We packed it out 1,300 patriots. Telling you the remnant is strengthening. It really is amazing to see. So God bless all of you that attended our event last evening. Lots to cover today. We got Candace Owen joining the show. We got so much stuff happening. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. We're about to get started. Speaker 1: The Charlie Kirk show. Every day is a battle for your mind raging. Information coming from every angle with the will to deceive. Fear not. You found the place for truth. The voice of a generation that still has the will to believe in the greatest country in the history of the world. This is the Charlie Kirk show. Buckle up. Here we go. Speaker 6: Hello, everybody. Radio stations across the country. Honored to be with you. You can email us as always freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Excellent event last evening in Reno, Nevada. It's great to see so many of you. I cannot emphasize enough the win for liberty, the win for humanity that the liberation of Twitter has meant for all of us. It's remarkable. Liberating Twitter from what it once was to what it is now is a win for the narrative. It's a win for truth. It's a win as we try to fight back against this uniparty regime, the tyrants, and the authoritarian dictators that are running the country. Elon Musk, even if they shut down Twitter today, will go down as a major hero for allowing us to be able to speak, to question narratives, to get the truth out. Elon Musk got himself in a little Speaker 7: bit of Speaker 6: trouble yesterday. Elon Musk responded to a tweet that I actually don't think the tweet is that smart. I think one part of it is legit, but I think another part of it is not so great. But the essence of what Elon was responding to is a major thought crime in America that the world's wealthiest man would comment on this is historic. So here's the tweet and it's responding to a video and the video was basically a white father with his white son saying to his son, Hey, you think that, you know, you're posting online all this anti Semitic stuff, why don't you go and say this to these Jewish families face? Pretty powerful advertisement. This is the ad, okay? It's about a minute long, it's a powerful ad, and then a person on Twitter responded to this advertisement, and then Elon responded to the person responding to the advertisement. It's important. Bear with us. Because right now, Elon Musk is being targeted like never before. Elon Musk was supposed to speak at a summit today, and he's been canceled. They don't want to hear from Elon Musk because they are tarring and feathering him as an anti Semite. They've come after this program for calling us anti Semites. They're coming after Elon Musk for calling, they're calling him an anti Semite. So here's the advertisement. It's a powerful ad. Play Cut 79. I saw what you've been posting. Speaker 2: Hitler was right. Speaker 6: I didn't teach you that. You hide behind your screen, spewing all this hatred and ugliness. Speaker 2: You got something you wanna say? Get out of Speaker 6: the truck and say it to their faces. Okay. So that that advertisement then was responded to by this person, the artist formerly known as Eric. Quote, okay. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. I am deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest swear word, Let's just say tiniest crap now about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. You want truth said to your face? There it is. Now, let me just say, this is not is not a very well written tweet. I said it's very confusing. I'll go through what they're basically saying here. Half of this tweet is true, half of it I don't like. You want the truth said to your face? There it is. Elon responds and he says you have said the actual truth. Now we don't know what part Elon is saying is the actual truth, so let's go through this. Again, it's double negatives and misuse of the word disinterested. It's a strange tweet that Elon pinpointed on here. But the first part is absolutely true. Let's go to this. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. Now, I don't like generalizations. Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true the Anti Defamation League was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left wing anti white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke and it wasn't just ADL, it was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges. Right? Mark Rowan, Leon Kaufman. Can we get that full list? It's very powerful. The part of the so that's totally true. And by the way, Tucker Carlson reinforces this. So I'm gonna kinda it was quite a day on the Internet. Tucker Carlson was inter interviewing Candace Owens. We have Candace Owens coming up next hour. And Tucker Carlson mentions that Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. We said this, by the way, last week, and people came after us. We came we actually said it in a different way. We said, I'm glad that Jewish Americans are reconsidering their financing of cultural Marxism. And people misunderstood it intentionally and slandered us as being anti Semites. But listen to this, Tucker Carlson is completely correct by saying this, that the philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country. Play Cut 92. Speaker 8: However, then I thought, well, wait a second. If the biggest donors at, say, Harvard have decided, well, we're gonna shut it down now. Where were you the last ten years when they Speaker 9: were going Speaker 8: for WeisGenocide? You were allowing this, and then I found myself really hating those people actually. That you're okay with that? On what grounds were you okay with that? Speaker 9: And I this is what I've been trying to explain to the pro Israel lobby that what you are seeing is lack of support, is people that are asking the question is where were you? Yeah. As we have endured all of this. You were paying Speaker 8: for it actually. Speaker 9: Right. You were Speaker 8: paying for it. Speaker 9: You were you were paying for it. Speaker 8: Because you were calling my children immoral for their skin color. You paid for that. And I don't So why shouldn't I be mad at you? I don't understand. Speaker 6: So what Tucker is saying is similar to part of the tweet that Elon isolated that is true. That let's just say liberals, but that includes Jewish financiers of liberal causes didn't really care about University of Chicago having courses that saying, you know, the problem with whiteness. They didn't really care about American Express saying that we must eliminate whiteness. They didn't, in fact, they were supportive of it. A lot of liberals were okay with critical race theory, diversity, equity, inclusion. ADL went all in on the BLM type narrative and ADL is one of many different organizations that were perfectly fine with the growing anti white wave. Now to be clear, many of these Jews did not fully understand what they were financing. Their intentions were probably pretty good. As we've said, intentions mean next to nothing here. And I'm sure some of the intentions weren't so good, but let's just attention to the side. I'm not that interested in intentions. I'm interested in actions. Okay? Intentions are very hard to pinpoint. We get too caught up in the conservative movement on intentions. I learned this from the great Dennis Prager, who says stop focusing on intentions, focus on the actions. It's a much better way to judge whether or not something is right or wrong. Intentions, as I've said before, and there's a video that went viral, the Nazis thought they were doing good. They convinced themselves that they were doing good, when in reality, they were doing some of the greatest evil in the history of the species. Again, So Hamas thinks they're doing good. I could go through all this, but they're doing evil. So I'm not convinced that somebody's intentions are what matter. Many Jewish financiers culturally given money to George Washington University, Columbia, Yale, Dartmouth over and over and over again. Hundreds of millions of dollars, billions of dollars financing many nonprofits that many of them are now recognizing and realizing this was a bad idea. So I'm going to build this out because the second part of the tweet I don't like, and it ties into some news that is not so good for AOC. It's not good for Ayanna Pressley. I'm going to isolate that in just a second. But let me just say before I talk about my Patriot supply, it is sloppy. It is shallow. It is wrong and repulsive to call a great man, Elon Musk, an anti Semite. It cheapens the label of anti Semitism. It is not good for anybody. Okay, My Patriot Supply. I want to tell you guys about My Patriot Supply. It is an amazing service that you guys can have. In fact, they will bring your emergency preparedness food to you. Go to mypatriotsupply.com. That is mypatriotsupply.com. You are nine meals away from anarchy. Go to mypatriotsupply.com, to make sure that you have the emergency preparedness food for what might be coming next. I know it feels like things are falling apart. Make sure you are prepared for your family right now. Mypatriotsupply.com. That is mypatriotsupply.com. Email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com. Yesterday was one of the livelier days in the history of the Internet. We're just getting started. Stay right there. Noble Gold Investments is pleased to let you know that gold was the best investment class for 02/2022. Through all our record breaking inflation, crashing stock market, the crypto scams, there is one asset that has held its own, gold. According to longtermtrends.net, gold has actually outperformed the S and P 500, Dow, and Bitcoin for 02/2022. Had you invested in the S and P five hundred a year ago, you would be down more than 20%. If you invested in Bitcoin a year ago, you'd be down more than 65%. If you invested in the Dow a year ago, you'd be down almost 10%. Yes. Gold has outperformed them all in 02/2022, and silver is not far behind. Yes. While the world was busy hailing other assets as the real hedge, gold and silver are the only assets that would have protected your wealth. So join the thousands of others by opening a gold IRA or silver IRA with Noble Gold Investments. Get in right now, and you'll bag a free one fourth of an ounce American Gold Eagle coin with every qualified IRA of $50,000 or more. You can't go wrong with Noble Gold Investments and their thousands of five star reviews. Call Noble Gold at (877) 646-5347 to add real gold to your IRA. That's (877) 646-5347. We frequently get asked the question, who's in charge? Who is calling the shots? So it's clear it's not Joe Biden. There's somebody else that is in charge. Well, our next guest is Seamus Brunner, who has a new book out that is very interesting. Exposing the Billionaire Class, Their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life. Sounds uplifting. Seamus, welcome to the program. Speaker 10: Hey, Charlie. It's great to be with you. Speaker 6: Tell us about your book. Speaker 10: Yeah. So I hear it all the time that the pandemic is over. The pandemic is in the path. That's not true. The pandemic was a blueprint for the future and you see it all the time. Our world is getting smaller. It's getting more and more controlled. We're losing control over our children's education, over everything from our food sources to our finances. And so this really lays out the people who are pushing this agenda. Speaker 6: Well, walk us through some of the specifics and the details that that are in the book, and, you know, we can go from there. Speaker 10: Sure. So we follow the money. We follow it all the way to the top at the Government Accountability Institute. We followed it to Davos. I know you've done some great work on this stuff. Let's see. Like, Bill Gates and the the food scheme he's got going. Everybody knows that Bill Gates is buying up all this farmland in The US. They know he's investing in creepy fake food companies, but they're you know, they're not really sure why. And so a lot of it is about money. We we follow the patents. Bill Gates, I mean, as a software salesman, he knows all about licensing and all about intellectual property. His father was an intellectual property attorney. He really helped Microsoft get off the ground. Well, he has used that intellectual property knowledge to start cornering the markets in industries like food. So for example, he buys into Beyond Meats and Impossible Foods only after they have received their patents. And that's kind of the whole thing with these fake foods. It's they say it's about climate change and solve you know, solving climate change, saving the planet. What it's really about is patenting our food sources. They patented the seeds. They've patented the fertilizers, and now they're patenting the meats. Speaker 6: Yeah. So, I mean, the more sinister explanation is that Bill Gates might wanna have less less people. What what what is the or what is the reason you would say that Bill Gates wants to control our food supply? Speaker 10: Well, that's absolutely true, and it sounds like a conspiracy theory. I thought it was too. And you see these clips every now and then of Bill Gates saying there needs to be less people. But that's what all of the characters in this book actually believe. They think that the Earth is vastly overpopulated, and population needs to go down. They don't ever really give you specifics on how they plan to bring the population down. Okay, Speaker 6: everybody. Welcome back. I mean the essence is this: Why do Jews continue to support institutions that hate them? Let's just make it as plain as possible, right? The the part of the tweet though that I want to isolate that I don't like is the kind of bitterness here. Quote, this person said that Elon responded to, I'm deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest crap now about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. This is where I disagree. I support own awakening. I think it's awesome that anybody wakes up regardless of if they did something prior in the past. I don't like that kind of bitterness and that kind of cynicism, to be honest. This person says I'm deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest crap about Western Jewish populations. I see it completely different. I think I think it's exciting and hopeful that Jewish Americans are starting to divest dollars from university campuses. I think that it's exciting when any population starts to reconsider their prior views. So kind of break out of the bitterness. Yes, of course, it's true that traditionally Jews have been funding in America institutions that hate them. And that's too bad. That's tragic. But there's the fact that they're discontinuing that, that they're speaking out against it, that gives me hope. So actually, I do have concern for that. So I I don't know if Elon was responding to that part of it. I think it was probably the first part. If I had to summarize again, I don't know. I can't read Elon's mind. He's gonna have to defend himself. He has sent out subsequent tweets mainly focused on the ADL saying why does the ADL turn a blind eye to anti white, anti Asian hatred while we import the third world that hates Jews and hates everybody? So he's clarified that. So to his credit, it's pretty clear. But this is very important. And we're starting to see some legitimate hope and movement in this direction, which I think is it was very exciting, which is that this announcement yesterday, AIPAC, the American Israeli Political Action Committee, has announced that they are going to spend $100,000,000 to defeat the squad. They're gonna spend a $100,000,000 to in Democrat primaries to go after AOC, Ilan Omar, Jamal Bowman, Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, and there's two other black women. I don't know who they are. I think it might be Fox is the other one. I I I don't know. The squad has grown. Okay. They've multiplied in number. And AIPAC, the American Israeli political action committee is saying, we wanna get rid of the members of the squad. Now, of course, that's not the best use of their money. Their best use of their money is support Donald Trump, is an amazing friend of Israel, who fought against all this poison, but this is a better use of money than the traditional investments that we've seen from sending money to Harvard, sending money to Yale, sending money to the ADL, sending money to BLM. This is way better than APAC spending $100,000,000 to try to defeat Marjorie Taylor Greene or Lauren Boebert. This is now $100,000,000 that they're spending where AOC is gonna have to defend her turf. Elon Omar is gonna have to defend her turf. So to respond to this now viral tweet that Elon responded to, this person says I'm disinterested in giving the tiniest crap about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization. Wrong. We wanna win, and you should not say, hey, you're not welcome into the club because you made mistakes prior. I don't wanna be part of that political movement. I think that is callous, that is elitist, that smug. People should always be welcome to admit errors. Always. I think that's a bad attitude across the board. I held some really stupid political positions five years ago. Some people say, you're still not allowed in the club, Charlie, because you said something stupid five years ago. So there's no growth allowed. There's no forgiveness. There's no humility. Honestly, that's an anti Western value. It's an anti Christian value to say that what you said five years ago will always be hung around your neck and you'll never be allowed to grow, to develop, to clarify, to educate yourself. And I think it's actually exciting and showing that AIPAC, which does tilt Democrat, just so we're clear, most of the membership of AIPAC are Democrats. They are investing their resources to try and make it harder for Marxists to win. Is that the best use of their money? No. It is a far better use of money than what we have seen the last twenty or thirty years. It is a positive move in the right direction. So anyway, that's Elon Musk's response. Elon will have to defend himself. Elon is not an anti Semite. What Elon was probably isolating here, as he has clarified in subsequent tweets, is that hey, Jewish populations have been financing a lot of this stuff. It's good that they are waking up. I think it's positive. I think it's exciting, and it gives me hope. More after the break. Email is freedom@CharlieKirk.com. Speaker 11: Do you Speaker 6: know that the average American spends about twenty years in retirement? That's a long time to live without a steady income. And we wanna make sure you enjoy every moment of it and don't outlive your money. Retirement is about more than just investments. It's about living your best life. Let's not retire. Let's pivot. My friends at Pax Financial, who I use for my wealth management future, develop a course for the sole purpose of helping you pivot. If you want your own free guide to pivoting into the new chapter of life with purpose, visit packsfg.com/charlie. I don't think they're investing their money into the new modern day equivalents of hospitals or public parks. Rockefeller, for example, donated millions of acres in Maine and Wyoming, which we now know as the gateway to Yellowstone Park. They literally named the entire highway after it. You know, Carnegie built, you know, not just Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon, but also huge amounts of public infrastructure projects. Talk about how this is a different elite. This is a different mindset. This is a separate psychology than we've seen of the elites a century ago. Speaker 10: That's exactly right, Charlie. The the, you know, the oligarchs so called oligarchs of the early twentieth century are nothing like what we're seeing today. What we see today with the big tech oligarchs is, like, it's got complexes on steroids. They want to control every aspect of your life from what you're eating to what you're seeing. I mean, information, of course, you you know, you talk about it all the time with the censorship and the clampdowns on descent. And as far as loving America, no. These are these are avowed globalists. They're loyal to the World Economic Forum, and Davos just they, you know, they call themselves citizens of the world. That's, know, the abolition of borders and Soros funding all of these migrant groups moving people into The US. He wants to do away with borders. And so, yeah, there's there's a you know, I they don't state that they're not loyal to The United States, but their actions and especially their funding show that they have other loyalties. Speaker 6: Yeah. The this kind of, other loyalties is important, and the god complex is bad. What's even worse than the god complex is wanting to use your kind of wealth and your power to remake the country, not to shore up its defenses. I mean, Henry Ford certainly had some issues. Right? But he poured into the country. He wanted a very strong country. And so where does this come from? Why is it that the new roster of the elites that you detail in your book, Controllogarchs, why do they hate the homeland so much? Where does this come from? Is it because they went to university? I mean, Bill Gates was a dropout. Is it because they were raised in a Silicon Valley finance culture that is more globalist minded? Where does it come from? Speaker 10: Well, let's see. Yes. That's exactly right. I mean, it's the globalist mindset. It's and it's not so it's not necessarily just America. It's more the peasant class. I mean, they have more in common with the elites of China, for example. I go, you know, into great detail about how they really love China, and they love the Chinese system. They love this amalgamation of capitalism and communism. State run capitalism is what they call it in China. Claus Schwab calls it stakeholder capitalism, which I know you've talked about, and it's sort of this esoteric term. But stakeholder capitalism, when you read Claus Schwab's manifestos, the people who don't aren't the stakeholders. He never talks about the people. We the people being stakeholders. It's always business leaders and NGOs and officials from, you know, the government. We don't have a seat at that table. Speaker 6: Yeah. So to kinda build that out further, though, which is there's the World Economic Forum. You have Klaus Schwab on the front page of your book. Everyone is driven by something different. I I I don't know if you agree with this. Do you think that Soros has a different agenda than Zuckerberg? I do. Zuckerberg seems like a guy who wants to end the game with the most tokens. Soros is a guy that wants to destroy the game. Would you agree with that? Speaker 10: Yeah. But they they I do I do agree with that. I mean, they're all they're all have different motivations to a degree, but they also have a lot of the same motivations in that they want to control, you know, every facet of life. I, you know, see it time and again both with Soros and with Zuckerberg. So, yes, they're they have different opinions. They're different people. Speaker 6: Yeah. I mean, I I just I I think that Soros is far more sinister and kinda say Machiavellian. Zuckerberg, I think, is malleable. I mean, based on all public accounts, people that have known Zuckerberg, he's used to be kind of this free speech liberal, almost libertarian, but I think he's a coward. I think that external forces have been able to shape shift Zuckerberg. I think he wants to be liked. I think he wants to have his empire. He wants to be reasonable. Soros is a legit ideologue. We we have no evidence that Zuckerberg in his private musings is all about, you know, western transformation. Right? Now he might be doing that, but as far as his intention, I'm not so sure. Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk Speaker 6: Okay, everybody. Hillsdale College. I'm wearing my Hillsdale tie today. With America's college and universities so morally corrupt, they're less concerned with critical thinking than with indoctrination. I'm happy to report there is a college where students debate ideas openly and honestly. It's my favorite college, Hillsdale College. You can learn more at charlieforhillsdale.com. As stated in Hillsdale's founding document in 1844, Hillsdale's original mission was to offer the serious kind of liberal arts education needed to preserve the blessings of civil and religious liberty across the land. Look, if you go to charlieforhillsdale.com, you'll find a short video. It's over a minute long showing how Hillsdale's work, not only on its Michigan and Washington DC campuses, but across the nation is effective in defending American liberty. Their online courses are excellent. You've got to check it out right now. Go to charlie4hillsdale.com. That is charlief0rhillsdale.com. As stated in the Hillsdale online documents, you've got to check it out. Charlie for hillsdale dot com. You could take the Victor Davis Hanson American citizenship class, the American history class, of course, on Aristotle, Winston Churchill, mathematics, Euclidean geometry, Genesis, Exodus. Do you want to learn? Charlieforhillsdale.com is the place to start. They do a wonderful job, and they are America's greatest college by far. So check it out. Charlieforhillsdale.com. Okay. So some of you might say, but Charlie, is there really a war on white people? Yeah. Let's put aside all of the obvious anti white violence we've seen in high schools, the white kid getting killed. You know, let's put all that aside, which which is clear. Let's put aside the University of Chicago course, the course at Yale, all that stuff. This is an amazing example of what we're talking about. Now, to be very accurate, you can't say that, you know, liberal Jews are funding this. Okay? What we're getting at, though, is that this example is one of hundreds of thousands that should really make you think deeply about what is happening in American education. It is fashionable. It is popular. It is in vogue to hate white people. I'm going to prove it to you. There's a new series of videos over the last couple of weeks that I've seen of students that record on Zoom high school debate competitions. Now, to be clear, high school debate is not what it used to be. It doesn't teach rhetoric. It doesn't teach persuasion. It doesn't teach public speaking. It doesn't encourage an authentic understanding of a topic. High school debate has become spewing of left wing talking points and they become winners. Now, recent weeks, high school students in debate again have been recording these debates on Zoom and have been putting them on the Internet to say, hey, look what passes as debate now. Look what passes as a popular argument or a what's considered to be a winning argument. So, oh, is this a guy that does this incubate debate James Fishback? I I guess he's the one that's tweeting this stuff out. It's very interesting. I I I wasn't aware of that. So I want you to listen very carefully. This here is a high school debate team that won the debate. I want you to count how many times they say the word white. This is what is considered to be a good argument. They ignored the prompt and resorted to shamelessly attacking white people, not once, not twice, but with zero depth whatsoever, blaming white people for all the problems. Listen carefully. This is what is considered to be a winning debate team in America today. Play cut one thirteen and listen carefully. Speaker 12: We demand that white Christians be held accountable for America's original sin. The negative continues the trend in politics while whiteness devours the other. Debating this topic is irrelevant while society is dominated by white Christians. Even if we have something educational to say about this topic, the political will just pray it away and continue their mission to conquer the world in the name of Jesus Christ. The military industrial complex has been coupled with American Christianity, the worship of the weapons of whiteness. United States was built to be a city upon a hill for white Christians. American Christianity has controlled all aspects of politics such as justifying slavery. We solved by decoupling weapons and worships and ending the crusade. White Christians literally inscribe scriptures onto their weapons, worshiping through war. We want to repent for our sins and show America's failure. By voting for us, the judge will send his signal to political leaders and condemn Christian in politics. Speaker 13: That ends up being a two one for Livingston. The affirmative tells me in summary and final focus that the role of the ballot for me is to reject Christian militarism. So at the end of the day, I'm left with deciding which side I think is better doing a better job rejecting Christian militarism. Speaker 6: That is considered to be a winning debate. They ignored the prompt and they just said, yeah, it's all about Christian militant militarism and white Christianity. That's considered to be deep. And they won. They won the debate. Where does that come from exactly? It goes down the tributary. It starts at Harvard. It starts at Yale. It starts at Dartmouth. And then it goes down. They create the teaching standards. They create the curriculum. And what many Jews are texting me to their great credit, They're saying, oh my gosh. High school debate will soon say this. They'll soon read a prompt. And it's the Jews' fault. They're an inch away from saying that. This close. And what Candace was saying and what Tucker was saying and what Elon is saying is that that clip I just played until recently did not bother most liberal Jews. And that's frustrating. Now it does bother a lot of liberal Jewish donors. Dots are starting to be connected. They're like, Oh, wait. All the toxicity and venom and hatred that we turned a blind eye to or we might have been cool with against white people is now being directed to us. So in that high school debate clip, you saw these kids reading a prompt, right? Reading a prompt, and they say, you know, white people are to blame for this. It doesn't take a massive leap to turn that high school debate kid to plug and replace, to copy paste white people out, Jewish in. That's where this comes from, guys. We've said this for the last couple weeks. Why is it that so many young people are on board for the Palestinian liberation thing or Gaza? Why are so many young people praising Osama bin Laden right now? It's a big thing right now on TikTok. Huge. Osama bin Laden is being praised by Generation Z because you've taught them to hate America, to hate white people, and then eventually hate Jews. And Hamas sympathizers are literally BLM two point o. You guys remember this. Here's cut one fourteen. White people begging for forgiveness from black people. This is during Floyd a Palooza. Play cut one fourteen. Okay. That's some sick stuff. Speaker 7: By the Speaker 6: way, it's sick on two sides. It's sick for the white people doing it and sick for the black people that are allowing it to happen. Like, some black guys should be like, this is insane. Get up. Enough. We're gonna take responsibility for our own problems. Get off your knees. Stop asking are you a you should have been are you KKK? Are you racist? Then stop apologizing. Enough. Stop pandering to us. You got that black woman crying. Oh my gosh. I've been waiting for this my whole life. I can get a job. Give me a break. The white hate gets turned into white guilt in the heads of weak minded people who then fall for the rhetoric. So where what does all this tie together, everybody? You are living through without a doubt one of the most heated, consequential, high stakes realignments in the history of the digital narrative war. I know that some of you might not see it, you might not be looking at it. If you are not actively on social media, you might not be watching it. I'm telling you, you are living through a TikTok, Twitter, Instagram. I have never seen sea changes like this ever. And we are flirting with some really dangerous stuff. Very dangerous stuff. There's some exciting stuff happen of people waking up and enlightenments and awakening and the rising of the frequencies. Producer Andrew said this morning, I have never seen so many people wake up so quickly. That is true. Simultaneously, I have not seen so much garbage, venom, crap spread so quickly in the history of the digital narrative war. Remember, Twitter is the incubator of elite opinion, but TikTok is the incubator of idiocy for generation Z. Let me say that again. Twitter is the incubator for elite thought. TikTok is the incubator of idiocy for Generation Z. They might say, but Charlie, let's compete on TikTok. We try. We have our, you know, I resisted as long as I could. They censor us. They ban us. They suppress us. TikTok, which is a Chinese Communist Party asset funded by the Chinese Communist Party, they elevate content that weakens America, weakens Western society. They will give priority to trans content. They give priority to gay content. They give priority to left wing politics, and they deemphasize pages that would talk about masculinity, borders, free speech, or conservative values. Chinese TikTok is all about solving math problems and games and being healthy and having big families. American TikTok is about cutting off your genitals, taking Lupron, and supporting Hamas. So what I'm getting at here, the macro, because some of you might say, but Charlie, how do all these different dots connect? You are living through right now one of the greatest changes of how people view the world in my life by far in my lifetime. I've not seen anything like it. COVID was close, but the difference with COVID is that almost all the means of communication were suppressed. We couldn't speak openly on Twitter during COVID. We kept on losing access to our Twitter account. We now have Twitter, so the truth can get out. We're like, wow. Could you if we had axe this is a this is the truth. If we had access to Twitter and Elon owned Twitter during COVID, I think hundreds of thousands of lives would have been saved. We got suppressed on ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, monoclonal antibodies. Imagine how many lives could have been saved if we had Twitter during COVID. It's a big deal. At the same time, we for every action there's equal and opposite reaction, we have Twitter and then we have TikTok, which is just this Wuhan laboratory of anti West hatred that Gen Z is just getting. It's pumping in. By the way, I've been completely unsuccessful. I tell parents, why do you give yourself your kids phones? Honestly, because parents don't want a parent anymore. That's why. They give their kid a digital pacifier so they can go back to wine and their kid can just stare at the screen all day long. Like, I don't know why my kid is depressed. Yeah. Go look at your kid's screen time. Okay? Eight and a half hours staring at TikTok. Yeah. I mean, don't be surprised when their suicidal ideation goes up. It's just so weird. Why do some of these kids depressed and anxious? Because they're staring at their screen all day long. Go be a parent. Go stare at a tree. Go fish. Go for a run. There's a life outside of watching a bunch of trannies dancing in favor of Hamas. Relieffactor.com, 100 drug free relief factor, knee pain, back pain, joint pain, double pain. Check it out right now at relieffactor.com. The 100% drug free Relief Factor could be the best solution for you. Leah was sitting on her couch in so much pain. She was literally in tears. You've got to check it out. She says, I'm so I'm truly amazed at this product. If you're living with aches and pains, see how Relief Factor, a daily drug free supplement could help you feel better and live longer. You're gonna get started. Try this Relief Factor three week quick start. It's only $19.95 and comes with feel better, your money back guarantee. Visit relieffactor.com. That's relieffactor.com. $1,800 for relief. That's $1,800 for relief. They're amazing. So check it out right now. Relieffactor.com. So please check it out right now. Relieffactor.com. One Sunday, Leah was sitting on her couch. She was in pain and got out of pain. Relieffactor.com. $1,800 for relief. Feel better and money back guarantee only $19.95. That is relieffactor.com relieffactor.com. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. You are living through a digital realignment, a narrative war that is changing in real time. It's exciting and also scary simultaneously. We'll be right back. Because colleges and universities today are less concerned with critical thinking than with indoctrination. It is no wonder why so many young Americans embrace cancel culture, deny free speech to conservatives, and even celebrate terrorism. There is one college where students debate ideas openly and honestly, where they pursue truth together with their professors, and where America's great heritage of liberty is studied and revered. My favorite college, Hillsdale College. As stated in Hillsdale's founding document in 1844, Hillsdale's original mission was to offer the kind of serious liberal arts education needed to preserve the blessings of civil and religious liberty across the land, and this mission continues to guide Hillsdale College today. You can learn more at my favorite college's website, charlieforhillsdale.com. There, you will find a short video. It's just over a minute long showing how Hillsdale's work, not only on its Michigan campus, not only in Washington DC campus, but across the nation is effective in defending American liberty. Take some time to watch today at charlieforhillsdale.com. You are you're kind of super well built and trimmed. I think that's a good use of money. What's not a good use of money is his taxpayer funded electric vehicle ambitions. Tell us about it. Speaker 10: Yeah. That's right. And just going back to what you were saying a moment ago about Zuckerberg versus Doros, I think Bezos is a lot closer to Zuckerberg. Like you say, I mean, he had this sort of almost libertarian bent in the nineties, and it's sort turned into more I mean, he's very quiet. You don't hear much from him except when you see him doing these photoshoots. But it's yeah. But the with the electric vehicle, I mean, everyone knows about Amazon and Alexa. They're always listening to you. But what most people don't know is that they're actually trying to figure out what you're thinking. And and Amazon Web Services is, you know, a huge AI Speaker 1: Where tyranny dies and wisdom lives. The Charlie Kirk Show. Speaker 6: Somebody asked me the other day, how are you able to keep going on with this? Preserving liberty means more to me than anything else. You see, we're in a very important time in our nation's history. You look around in this room. Don't give me this nonsense that Americans are giving up. That is not true. Amfest.com. Amfest.com. Check it out. Phoenix, Arizona. It's gonna be the largest event we've ever held, god willing. Wait till you see the speakers we're announcing tomorrow. So get your tickets today while they're still there. Amfest.com. K. Welcome back. I I wanna just keep on encouraging APAC. I'm glad that they're deploying those resources in that way. It's not the best, but it's better, and that deserves encouragement and praise. God bless them. Candace Owens mentioned this, and we have Candace Owens coming up next hour. By the way, Candace was trending on Twitter all over the place, and people were so unfair to Candace Owens. I have her back a 100%. People say, oh, she's an anti Semite. I said, really? Candace Owens who dropped everything. I was in Jerusalem. It's a true story. I called Candace. I said, Candace, we have an extra ticket if you want it to go to the embassy opening when Trump moves the embassy. And she says, oh my goodness. She drops everything, eighteen hour flight, brutal connection through Europe, two red eye flights to get all the way to Israel for the embassy opening with Donald Trump. We saw where Jesus healed the sick. We went to the city of David. We saw the old city, and she loved it. So it's just these people, it's just so shallow, so sloppy. I don't like it at all. We'll talk more about that next hour. But Candace said this and she's and this is a vibe that is out there. And I don't think some of the pro Israel pro Israel advocates are listening when we say this. I'm gonna I'm gonna I'm in a separate category. I I have some bitterness that I've expressed on the show, which is the way that I've been talked about and treated has really bothers me, to be honest, because of how much prohazard advocacy I've done and do, but I'm a put put me aside. Okay? There is a Jonathan Greenblatt who runs the ADL. The ADL is an awful organization. He goes on television and he's saying this quote, Administrators are going to find their backbone if we hold them accountable. This is about the anti Jew hatred on campus. And by the way, he's correct in saying this to be perfectly fair. Donors need to hold them accountable. Students need to hold them accountable. Then he says the federal government needs to have them accountable. I don't really know what that means. Okay? But Jonathan Greenblatt, the reason why Candace said what she said on Tucker and the reason why the vibe on the right is off on this is we're like, really? Where were all of you guys the last couple of years? I thought hatred to one group is hatred to everybody. That's literally in the ADL ad. In the ADL ad is that all hate oh, I guess all hate is bad unless it's hatred of Asians and hatred of whites. Play cut 56. Speaker 14: The question I was gonna ask you, which we have now seen at least the beginning of some pushback finally from people who run these schools. You mentioned Columbia, other places. Do you see the leadership at some of these schools that you've been pushing so hard? Are they now finding the backbone you just described? Speaker 15: Well well, they're only gonna find the backbone if we hold them accountable. Donors need to hold them accountable. Students need to hold them accountable, and the federal government does too. And let me tell you, the university presidents, they might not listen to some students, but when they run the risk of losing hundreds of millions of dollars in federal grants, they're going to respond. Speaker 6: So there's a ADL is comprised of left wing, sometimes secular Jews. There's a major upheaval that's probably going to happen in the ADL sometime soon. Now why is it that the ADL receives such focus from Elon Musk and from us? It's not just that they're liberal. It's that the ADL goes out of their way to try and debank you. The ADL goes out of their way to try to pull advertisers from your show or from Twitter. The ADL, as he says accountability by the way, I think you should finally do that. By the way, if the ADL finally waves the sword towards colleges, I will be an enthusiastic supporter, but I don't buy it. If the ADL will be nearly as harsh to Harvard as they have been to Elon, God bless them. But they won't. They're gonna treat Harvard and Princeton and Yale with kid gloves, Cause the ADL are first liberals and then they're Jews. That's and you know who said that? Dennis Prager. So don't call me an anti Semite. Their liberalism is more important than their Judaism. It's always been that way. And they've been captured by a lot of secular Jews. So the question is, will the ADL be as ferocious, intense, nasty to Princeton, Yale, Dartmouth and Stanford as they have been to Twitter, to Jack Posobic, to Bannon? Probably not. You know, Greenblatt says, yeah, you know, we need some accountability. Really? Greenblatt, why don't you we know the answer because liberalism is very important to him, and Harvard is the holy cathedral of American left wing liberalism. Okay? Harvard is the Vatican of American leftism. It's just where they it's where the the catechism of the left is published in Harvard. So when he says accountability, why doesn't Harvard say, we're gonna defund you. We're gonna burn you to the ground because he doesn't he doesn't mean it. Okay. More coming up next hour. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Did you know that there is one phase of sleep that almost everyone fails to get enough of? And this one phase of sleep is responsible for most of your body's daily rejuvenation, repair, controlling hunger and weight loss hormones, boosting energy, and so much more. I'm talking about deep sleep. And if you don't get enough, you'll probably struggle with cravings, slow metabolism, premature aging, or even worse conditions. Why don't most people get enough of this one most important phase of sleep? A big reason is magnesium deficiency because over eighty percent of the population is deficient in magnesium. And magnesium increases GABA, which encourages relaxation on a cellular level, which is critical for sleep. Magnesium also plays a key role in regulating your body's stress response system. Those with magnesium deficiency usually have higher stress levels, which negatively impact sleep as well. Now before you go out, buy a magnesium supplement. It's important to understand that most products out there only have one or two forms of magnesium when the reality is your body needs all seven forms of this natural sleep mineral. That's why I Magnesium breakthrough contains all seven forms of magnesium designed to help calm your mind and you fall asleep, stay asleep, and wake up refreshed. The deep sleep benefits are really noticeable. Visit magnesiumbreakthrough.com/charlie and enter code Charlie 10 for 10% off any order. The special offer is only available at magnesiumbreakthrough.com/charlie. Speaker 10: Cloud contract type deal from the Pentagon. All of the big tech agencies are hosting their operations on Amazon Web Services. That's kind of a thing that goes really unnoticed. I mean, you see when you're watching an NFL game that Amazon's got the great stats, and I do enjoy seeing those stats that are you know, from AI that they're giving you. But think about all of that technology. They boast of it in the commercials being used against you. I mean, it's a pretty terrifying prospect. So I would say that Bezos amongst the people on the cover I mean, you're certainly right. George Soros is a total ideologue and and, you know, more terrifying in a lot of ways than what he's trying to fund with the chaos and the total destruction of The United States. You don't see Bezos totally funding that, but he's funding the climate change ambition, the so called climate change ambitions that are really all about control from the vehicles to the smart homes. I mean, there's some examples in the book of smart thermostats. If you got a smart thermostat, imagine going home in the middle of the summer, going to bed and waking up drenched in sweat because the utility companies have decided they're gonna use your smart thermostat to keep the temperature high in the middle of the summer. It's happened in Texas. It happened in Colorado. You see Gavin Newsom in California telling people that their, you know, their temperatures of their homes need to stay up at 80 degrees when it's in a heat wave. I mean, it's just crazy. And Jeff Bezos is making the tech that allows you to do that. Speaker 6: The book is Controllogarcs. We will be right back after the break. Seamus Seamus, stay right there. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. We'll be right back. The book is Controllogarcs. Seamus Brunner continues with us. So, Seamus, let me ask you about this one, weaponizing artificial intelligence. Controllogarchs are rapidly ratcheting up AI to extinguish what remains of a free market and push Americans into Marxism. This is a very deep topic. I've always been I'm I'm worried currently that AI is going to be used as a tool to create a tyrannical society even worse than what we have. Your thoughts? Speaker 10: You're exactly right to be worried, and it's happening right now. The intelligence agencies, they're using AI. They're gonna use the tech companies to do it. You look at the biggest company, ChatGPT. I mean, regarding the of all you know, getting rid of the free market. Look at the largest company behind ChatGPT, OpenAI. There's a reason that OpenAI is funding universal basic income studies. And it's I mean, they you know, there's other experts, World Economic Forum experts who say that AI is going to eliminate 40% of the jobs. Either you're gonna have to adapt or you're gonna be out of work. And, you know, I think the ultimate goal here, they sort of state it when they say you will own nothing and be happy in Davos, is sort of a peasant class living in high rise buildings and ultra low emission zones with no cars eating the bugs, and that's what AI is going to allow. Speaker 6: In your research, how then do we best counter the the looming AI threat from these contrologarchs? Speaker 10: Well, the first step is you gotta be aware of this, and you gotta be aware of their blueprint. I mean, sunlight is the best disinfectant. Something that gives me hope in all of this is that keep more and more people are craving authenticity. As you see these AI thing, I mean, it's really cool that some of the videos you'll see online of what people are able to do with AI and making videos that look super real, but aren't. But then you see you can get down into the comment sections, and you see more and more people saying this is gross. This is creepy. It's the same thing with the fake foods. Something that gives me hope is, you know, they're not extremely popular, which is why they have to ban cows, and Ireland is headed towards slaughtering the cows. So as more more people become aware of what's going on, spread the word, shine the disinfecting light of sunlight on these agendas, that does give me hope. And, you know, nobody's gonna wanna live in a pod eating bugs. The question is once you're out of work and given a meager basic income of $30,000, are you going to be able to do anything about it? And that's why we need to act right now. Speaker 6: So your book Controllogarcs, set quote, rips back the curtain on never before published revelations. What are some of the craziest and most important revelations that our audience would not have heard before? Speaker 10: Well, I just published a piece on Breitbart today. It it might be the way he's lead story still, and this is about the the control guards profiting from abortion. I mean, right now, the supreme court is weighing whether or not to invalidate the FDA approval of a drug called mifepristone. It's also known as r u four eight six. And this is I mean, this thing is really a a sickening drug, and it shocked me when I found out that it's the most common method of abortion. Now you don't have to be pro life to find it sort of grotesque that people like George Soros and Warren Buffett are profiting and and setting up secret shell companies in the Cayman Islands in order to receive profits from chemical induced abortions. So that that drug, Texas was the great state of Texas was the one to sue the FDA last November saying that the Clinton era approval of this drug was totally crooked. And in the book, I actually document how just how crooked this was. It was the Rockefeller Foundation in partnership with a few other contrologarchs who brought this drug from a German company whose roots were in Nazi Germany. IG Farben's successor entity is called Huxde G. Huckst developed this drug that kills infants en masse or kills the new, I guess, fetuses en masse. And, you know, the you use tax exempt resources. This is what the Rockefeller Foundation does. They use tax exempt resources in partnerships with the government and the Clinton administration to bring this drug to market. Now it turns out that this is actually one of the most painful ways of having an abortion for a woman. And then you've got billionaires profiting from it. So I thought that was pretty pretty grotesque. You know, the a lot of the world economic forum stuff has been talked about. Yuval Noah Harari. I know you've talked about him a lot on the show. But just some of the some of the things that they are pouring billions of dollars into, whether the AI and the Neuralink type companies, microchips, brain microchips, with the test subjects being animals for now. I mean, actually, FDA just approved Neuralink for human trials. I thought this was all conspiracy theory stuff, microchips in brains. It's real. It's happening. Over 10,000 people have received microchips in their brains to ostensibly the the thin edge of the wedge is, to cure paralysis. But, of course, in the hype videos, it's like psychic text messaging and ultimately, like, VR porn, I guess, beamed directly into your brain stem. That kind of was shocking. And, it sounds like conspiracy theory stuff, but just go look at the videos on their websites. I mean, this is what they're trying to bring about. I mean, the founder of the Oculus Rift, is trying to make nerve implants to make VR porn more realistic. Zuckerberg has got patents, and patents is a huge theme in the book. I mean, that's what it's all about is patents equal profit. Zuckerberg's patenting things like Nu Skin and haptic suits so that when you're living in a virtual world, can you know, it's like Ready Player One type stuff. So it used to be dystopian future science fiction. It's all here. It's all now, and it's pretty shocking stuff. Speaker 6: So to reemphasize the abortion pill. Welcome back, everybody. Email us freedom@freedomcharleykirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Joining us now is one of my favorite guests, Heather McDonald. Heather, welcome back to the program. I want everyone to check out When Race Trumps Merit. So Heather, there's been several stories. Haley Biden carjacked in DC, eight teenagers charged with murder in Las Vegas of a young white man, San Francisco that's cleaning up all the streets for Xi, which is a separate issue in some way, but we see we see all these different stories and we're getting more and more emails. Do you think that white America is starting to wake up, that there is a multidimensional, multi institutional war against white people in this country? Speaker 16: Well, we haven't figured out a language yet to really talk about it, Charlie, that will be acceptable to even many conservative ears. But I certainly hear that from students. I was at the University of Virginia last week, and a young student that I was speaking with said that there is a growing awareness among young people, especially for white males, that they are absolutely pariahs in our society. They are going to be the last admitted to schools, excuse me, the last fired, the first fired. And so it is a reality, and it is a reality that is absolutely denied by the entirety of of our mainstream society and by many conservatives. But we need to keep pointing this out because there is no grounds whatsoever for European the inheritors of European civilization to cancel it. Now those inheritors may be people of all different colors, but the the people that are under attack are the Caucasian inheritors of that civilization. And at this point in world history, we have nothing to apologize for because any violations of human rights, and human rights is, of course, exclusively a European Western concept, violations of those rights, whether it's American slavery or imperial atrocities, pale in comparison to every other civilization's ongoing atrocities and violence. Speaker 6: So Heather, I mean, another example, at Louisiana Tech, a black student stabbing for white women is just another story that has happened. I do think that there is a greater and greater understanding and agreement that the laws, the enforcement laws, the lack of media coverage, it's almost fashionable to hate white people. Now, I guess the next question is, Heather, what next? Would it be helpful for, you know, white people or white America to recognize and realize this and talk about this more? Because anytime we notice it, it's the amazing phrase from Michael Anton. It's not happening, but it's good that it is. Like, we're not allowed to even notice it. Your thoughts, Heather McDonald. Speaker 16: It's not just fashionable to hate white people. It's presidential. You know, we have a president now who goes around at every opportunity, staying the preposterous lie that white supremacy is the biggest threat in this country. And and let's just let's just get the facts out there, Charlie, yet again because this is so completely denied by the media that amplifies the Biden message of white supremacy. If you look at all interracial violence between blacks and whites and whites and blacks, blacks commit 87% of all interracial attacks between blacks and whites and whites and blacks. A black is 35 times more likely to commit an act of violence against a white person than vice versa. And we see it, you know, the the few times when you get the videos and you get either the names that reveal that it's a black perpetrator because of the pseudo Africanist names. We see this happening, and yet we're in an absolute state of denial. So what it's gonna take, what sort of politician or leader to articulate that reality, it it remains a a very, very touchy thing. I mean, I can feel it when I go on, you know, what is, for us, the mainstream media, which is Fox News. If you use white in any other context than one of opprobrium, you really are asking to be called a racist by fellow conservatives. And that is preposterous because to say that whites are under attack is not to attack blacks per se. It is to notice the facts, the averages. Of course, there are millions of blacks who are law abiding, who don't want to be treated as perpetual victims and wards of the state. But on average, there is a pathological inner city culture that is creating dysfunction. You have now what's going on, a race hustle on the part of too many Black leaders where they can simply play upon white guilt and claim that it is an accomplishment in itself to be Black. You have the possibility now of specializing in being black just as I could specialize in being female, or gays can specialize in being gay. And that's the one accomplishment that nobody can compete with you And and and it gives you enormous power over the absolute pariahs of straight white males. Speaker 6: And yet we're told that racism is the biggest problem. What what could actually break the matrix, and I don't know if you agree, Heather, I think that it's probably fifty fifty. I don't think every black believes that racism is the biggest problem. I think some have convinced themselves of that, but I think deep down a lot of great Black Americans, they know that there are other problems. Like you said, the pathologies that are put into their culture, right? What is considered to be acceptable? Not staying with the women that you impregnate, so on and so forth. Instead of telling black Americans that they could be great by doing great noble things, we have this self esteem cult of like black girl magic. You're magical because of whatever. It's toxic. And of course, there are tons of problems in urban America and it continues, to this day. Let's just play this this this tape that just went viral here. Play 71. But of course, racism is the problem. Play cut 71. Speaker 10: On my butter. We do it. Don't play my slide on post play. It will get like that. No. No. No. No. Switches right here. And I picked up That's just enough right there. That's enough. +1, 23. That's enough. Yeah. Speaker 6: It's I don't know if you saw that video, Heather. It's such a mystery why there are so many murders in the inner city. So Heather, go through the numbers because I think what percentage of murders are committed by black men in the country? You know, crime, is it is it proportional to their population? Speaker 16: Oh, no. It's it's vastly disproportional. Blacks commit about 66% of all violent crime in the country, at least in the 75 largest counties, which is where most of the population resides. Though they're 15% of the population in those 75 largest counties, they commit well over half of all murders. It's it's so disproportionate. It's far more disproportionate than their number in the prison population where they're a third of the prison population. In fact, studies have shown that blacks are less likely to be convicted of felonies, whether because prosecutors just aren't coming down as hard or they've got sympathetic juries. But at at a third of the prison population, that's actually much less than you would expect from blacks involvement in violent crime. But that video is absolutely classic, Charlie. We've seen those videos. The police see those videos all the time. You know, we're supposed to believe that that the problem with these black kids is that they're too poor. They don't have any opportunities as the mayor of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, has said to to justify the the flash mobs, marauding magnificent mile beating up on white tourists. The fact of the matter is blacks are posting inner city kids post videos like that from their smartphones all the time showing off their showing off their money. The social media is the police's best friend because it helps them solve these gang ties. Any kid that has a smartphone is not economically deprived. That kid is richer in resources than than Louis the fourteenth ever was. But we have Speaker 6: That turned is our such a good point. That is so correct. Yes. That's a great point. Speaker 16: Turn our eyes to see because we can't look at it any longer. In the nineties, we were talking about rap music. We were talking about the cop hatred, the misogyny, the homophobia. We were disturbed by it. Now we don't even talk about it. We simply blame ourselves and and feel like it is somehow a violation of racial etiquette to mention these pathologies. And there's pathologies in the white underclass as well. Let's be perfectly clear. But this Charlie, it is so urgent for whites to stop caving into the race hustle because whites Speaker 6: Okay. I think we need to fix Heather's connection. I I wish we could have finished that sentence. We'll fix that connection in a second. Ruff Greens and by the way, let's just summarize it. This is this is so simple. Get married, get a job, graduate high school, don't commit crimes. Period. Ruffgreens.com. You've heard me talk about Ruff Greens and how it's helping dogs. You gotta check out dog food is dead food. Ruff Greens has essential vitamins and minerals, omega oils, digestive enzymes, probiotics, and plenty of antioxidants. Get your free jump start trial bag. All you have to do is cover the shipping. Check it out right now. Roughgreens.com/kirk. That is ruffgreens.com/kirk. You don't have to change your dog's food. Just add a small scoop of rough greens every single day. Has omega oils, digestive enzymes, probiotics. It's incredible. If you have a dog, you've got to check out ruffgreens.com/kirk. That is ruffgreens.com/kirk. Ruffgreens.com/kirk. Check it out right now. Ruffgreens.com/kirk. Heather McDonald continues after the break. She's amazing. Check out her book. It's very, very important. When race trumps merit. More after the break. People ask me everywhere I travel about StrongCell. Charlie, is StrongCell legit? Charlie, do you really believe in the antiaging properties of NADH? Charlie, is this product worth the price? My answer is the same to all of their questions. Yes, yes, and yes. I'm a huge believer in this approach to health and wellness. StrongCell is a scientific breakthrough in cellular health replenishment that combines NADH, co q ten, and marine collagen to boost your body's cellular function. I personally take strong cell every day, and so do a ton of our Kirk listeners. Go see the reviews for yourself. If you are someone who relies on caffeine or sugar just to keep yourself going, then you have to give StrongCell a try. I only have one important request of you. I recommend this life changing product, but you have to give it at least four weeks to realize the best results. It takes a little time to reengineer your body's NADH. Think about it. It's been on the decline for quite a while, and in some cases, for decades. First step, go to strongcell.com/charlie today. That's strongsell.com/charlie and read the personal testimonials for yourself. Then use promo code Charlie to get a special 20% discount on your order. Again, that's strongsell.com/charlie, and don't forget your 20% discount by using promo code Charlie at checkout. Covered a lot. Zuckerberg, Bezos not as much. Who remember, he owns the Washington Post and his ex wife, Mackenzie, like you said, she's worth $35,000,000,000 and she's just spending money like it's going out of style on left wing politics. And then you have Soros. Soros out of the five out of the six no. Out of the five. Out of the five is the most notorious to try to reshape western society. What do what have you discovered about George Soros that you feel does not get enough attention? Speaker 10: Well, you know, there's a question of whether the George Soros would even laugh, and should he be on the cover, would he be alive? He's 93 years old. And so I wanted to see who the next Soros is, and that's Alexander Soros. Of course, George Soros has multiple children. Each one of them funds radical left wing causes. And, unfortunately, his $25,000,000,000 empire is passed in the hands of Alexander Soros, who is much more radical than he is, his father that is his father. Alex Alex Soros has said he wants to use this $25,000,000,000 empire to fund abortion. And, I mean, it obviously calls it women's rights and reproductive health. They all use sort of these euphemisms for the mass extermination of fetuses. But so and and, of course, elections are you know, if Alex Soros lives to the age of his father, our elections are not safe for the next fifty years. Speaker 6: Yeah. The the entire Soros cabal and cartel Soros cabal and cartel is gonna have billions and billions and billions of dollars. Alexander Source, by the way, is more political than the other. I love this clip here. So here you have Bill Gates who wants to be in charge of your childhood vaccinations, food, and health. Play cut 60. Speaker 17: Out there distributing health advice that have a giant hole in their health game. Speaker 11: Yeah. Absolutely. Speaker 17: Like, Bill Gates is a great example of that. He's got this big fat belly, and he's telling people they have to get vaccinated. Like, this kind of binary thinking, this kind of ridiculous way of looking at the world through only pharmacological interventions, through only medicine, through only this, through only that. There's so many different things that you have to do to be healthy. Speaker 6: Yeah. The the the best part of the tape is actually when Rogan just roasts him for for other, physical attributes. Check out the book Controllogarcs. Seamus will continue, after the breakup. Seamus Brunner continues with us. So, Seamus, what piece of research are here in the book that we didn't talk about? Do you wanna make sure our audience is aware of? Just plug your book, Controllogarcs. Speaker 10: I think my favorite chapter was the dystopian present chapter, and that's the one that's all about Speaker 6: Welcome back, everybody. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Make sure you get involved with Turning Point USA. We're getting we're getting Heather MacDonald back. I wanna play this piece of tape. There's several pieces of tape. Let's play cut one eighteen. This, has gone viral, millions of views of a kid's birthday party, and the kids are celebrating with firearms. I wonder if they're loaded. The parents are on board with this. It is a black culture problem, everybody. You know who the first person to say that is? Brandon Tatum. Candace Owens. It's not racism. It's not white supremacy. I'm sorry. This is a this is a major problem. This is a kid's birthday party of six and seven year olds dancing around with handguns. Play cut one eighteen, please. Yeah. But racism is the problem. Right? White supremacy is the greatest threat to the American homeland. And you know what's really sick? And I don't delight in this. That Is some of those kids are probably gonna get killed in a crossfire. First of all, just that that's again just like rule number one, that's against like every rule of how you handle a firearm. Okay? So that that alone should just bother you. Okay? Secondly, you're letting eight year olds dance around with guns? Spare me the lecture that it's white people's fault. Heather McDonald continues. Heather, sorry for the tech issues. You were finishing I don't know if you remember the thought that you were on, but it was important. Do you wanna just summarize what you're talking about? We can go from there. Speaker 16: Well, yes, there's something that white people can do at this point. We get asked all the time to two on these. Well, what can we do to close the academic skills gap? And I say, the we that you're referring to cannot do anything more. The we that you're has been trying for five cost of trillions of dollars of transfer. Speaker 6: Sorry. Sorry. The the the tech the tech just is not there today. Maybe we'll be able to fix it. What I think Heather was saying is that the we you're referring to have done far enough. I wanna play this piece of tape. I don't know if we have my answer to it, but this is important. Some of the biggest pushers of white supremacy being the problem are white people. It is self loathing. By far, the most pushers are white people. I would say there's plenty Al Sharpton and all of are there, but okay. Well, that's fine. Blake is contributing. I'll I'll read what he has to say in a second. Blake got one nineteen. Speaker 18: You you made a claim that the family is the bedrock of a civilized society or a productive society. How do you define a family? Because in the two hundred fifty thousand years that humans have existed on this planet, the nuclear family where you had where you had a single breadwinner, 2.6 children at a white picket fence is barely a 100 years old. It's a post war phenomena based on on the wealth after World War two. So would you consider a family, a same sex couple, for example, a legitimate family that provides us bedrock for society. And also, you know, we can also remember that interracial families were once illegal as well, you know, so the idea of a family has changed in human history. It used to be extended. Anyway Speaker 6: That's not that's not the tape I wanted, but the the dialogue goes on for him mentioning that blacks are treated terribly later in the discussion in the criminal justice system. And my answer is, stop committing crimes. I think a lot of people are waking up because we the the culture, not us, the culture way overplayed their hand when it came to racism being the problem, white supremacy. And I think when you start to see videos like that kid's birthday party and the graduation of blacks waving around guns, like, yeah, time out. Enough blame, Whitey. In fact, we have one of our most viral clips at NAU where a black student says, well, isn't it white people's fault? Like, why is it white people's fault that black men don't stay with the women that they impregnate? How is that my fault or the white race's fault? How is that white supremacy's fault? The answer and by the way, just so we're clear, 70 plus percent. So ish, depends on what city, but it's right around 75%. So about one in four ish, but we'll round down. 70% of black men abandon the women they impregnate. White people are not to blame for that. Candace Owens joins us next. Speaker 10: Purchases products and sell them to us cheap Chinese goods, just for money and that, you know, all that all of our businesses and the hollowing out of our manufacturing sector, it was all just about money. That's not the case. The people in this book like the Chinese model. They like this state run, capitalism model where, you know, a few select corporations can really make it rich while the rest of the people, if there's any dissent, instantly clamped down on, instantly disappeared. I mean, you see it with the COVID. You saw it with the COVID lockdowns. That was modeled after China's zero COVID policy. And even after China's zero COVID policy was shown to be an absolute failure, I mean, when you saw Shanghai residents locked down for days or weeks at a time, even after the the zero COVID policy was a failure, you still see these guys like Bill Gates advocating for lockdowns. And so the sort of collusion between Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci and both of their favor towards China, that's a huge problem. The social credit score is what I believe the end game is. I think the book shows that they're supporting millions and billions of dollars into digital ID efforts. Just last week, Bill Gates and the United Nations and the Rockefeller Foundation hosted an event called fifty in fifty, how 50 countries within five years are going to be rolling out these digital ID regimes, the central bank digital currencies. You know, these all sound like conspiracy type terms, but I know you know, Charlie, I know your audience is smart. They know that these are full speed ahead. The Atlantic Council also last week said that DBDCs are maintaining momentum, strong momentum through into 2024. The Fed is working on CBDC. The World Bank and the Bank of International Settlements love the idea of a global CBDC. You know, that the CBDC combined with the digital ID, combined with the information control is like game over. Speaker 6: One minute, Seamus. With your research, what is their vulnerability? What is their weak spot? Speaker 10: Well, it's it's We The People. We need to band together. If you're not doing something to counteract this force that is being exerted upon you, you need to, at the very least, spread the word. Our founders were right that, you know, that's why shows like yours are important. Getting the information out there, even, you know, just liking and subscribing and sharing, as dumb as that may sound, really is important and and evangelizing to your relatives and being you know, it's hard if you don't have the facts and you try to go to Thanksgiving dinner and convince your liberal uncle Larry of something, you know, you're not gonna make much headway. You gotta have the facts and the figures, then you'll, you know, talk to him and ask him what he thinks and ask him to explain his position. You'll find nine out of 10 times they really can't. So we do have an advantage with the fact that the truth is on our side. And the one the other thing that I would say we need to do is correct the imbalance. I mean, the left is just like you know, people like George Soros, though it's like an endless ATM for left wing causes, and there are Endless. Great conservative pay Yeah. Speaker 6: Gotta run. Speaker 10: Great conservative donors. We need more. Speaker 6: Seamus Brunner, excellent work. Controllogarchs, thank you so much. Everyone check it out. Joining us now is James Lawrence, attorney for the Legal Defense Fund for Douglas Mackie. James, thank you for taking the time. James, our audience is familiar, with this story and with what's happening, with mister Mackie. Just give us an update. How is Douglas doing personally? Speaker 19: Thanks again, Charlie, for having me on to discuss this case. So to get your audience up to speed, on October 18, the federal district court judge in Brooklyn, New York sentenced mister Mackey to serve seven months in prison for violating federal law under allegedly under 18 USC two forty one. So seven months in prison, which will start in January. So he was ordered to report to prison in January. And then importantly for your audience to know, he asked for the sentence to be stayed pending appeal. So his legal team right now is in the process of appealing the conviction to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. And so his defense asked for the district court judge to allow the appeal to go forward and for his sentence not to start until all appellate options had been exhausted. The judge denied that request and ordered him to report for the start of his sentence beginning in January. And another point for your audience to be aware of, again, send us on October 18. On October 17 Speaker 1: The voice of generations is the Charlie Kirk Show. Speaker 6: Okay, everybody. Welcome back. Just briefly, Noble Gold Investments. Check it out. I'll tell you more about this later, but Noble Gold is seeing a huge investment of gold buyers from billionaires to multimillionaires to institutional investors. The people who are not afraid are those that invest in gold from Noble Gold Investments. That's noblegoldinvestments.com. Use promo code Charlie to bag a free five ounce America to beat up a coin with each gold or silver IRA. If you qualify, that's noblegoldinvestments.com. Joining us now is the great Candace Owens. Candace is forty weeks pregnant, everybody. So she might have to leave at any moment's notice. Thank you for taking the time. Candace, had a viral interview with Tucker yesterday, but after that or right as the interview was posted, Ben Shapiro tweeted at a Bible verse that you tweeted, which I found to be totally out of line and kind of triggered this massive Internet dispute, and he effectively asked you to resign from the Daily Wire. Candace, what is going on here? Speaker 9: Well, first, I just wanna say that I think people thought it was like all of this was like suspicious timing and that there's no conspiracy theory here. First and foremost, I had signed Donovan Tucker weeks ago. So this interview was already planned. And then obviously, the night before the video of Ben saying some remarks about me went viral. And then minutes before my Tucker interview aired, he did tweet that and I haven't yet gotten any clarity on what the significance of that tweet was. Me posting the Bible passes was just basically me calling for peace and accepting you know, the things that you can't change. And I definitely have had a very peaceful, happy end of pregnancy. And so I didn't and still don't really understand the nature of the tweet, but I did feel compelled in this instance to answer more strongly because it was a biblical passage. And I have said for a very long time that it does feel like Christians are always being told to shut up. And when you share just a biblical passage and it's somehow being construed or being told that there's something wrong with this passage, it was important for me as a Christian to defend our faith. Speaker 6: Yeah. Totally. So this has kind of been simmering for a couple of weeks. So just by background, Ben at a private event spoke to a group of people, and I wanna make sure I'm very clear and specific. He said something on the lines of you have faux sophistication on the matter, Candace. That was his quote. What is he talking about here? I mean, I follow you on social media. I'm a very pro Israel person. Right? I get accused of being a Jewish shill on a daily basis. Like, what what is Ben talking about here? And then secondly, why of all the tweets that he decided to ask you to resign, did he choose a bible verse? Speaker 9: Charlie, you your questions are the same questions that I have. I what what I have said on Tucker and what I will say here is that I think a lot of people who are emotionally involved in the conflict overseas are perceiving people that are actually moderate as radical. And they're not able to see that maintaining a level head is okay. And I think that when they have the benefit of hindsight and it's 2020, they're going to maybe regret some of the things that they've especially amongst their most fervent to to their most fervent allies and supporters, which is why on Tucker, I even brought up the concept of the attacks that have been constant against you. And if it's it's sort of like if you don't veer into radicalism right now, then they take everything. There's an extreme sensitivity there, you know? And every comment that you make, and I can correlate this two weeks ago when I was quite literally, I I sent two tweets back to back about Brian Mast and his comments in in congress being wrong as somebody that is a citizen congressman about saying there's no such thing as innocent civilian life. And then I followed it up by saying, you know, any sort of genocidal language is wrong no matter what government's coming from. I was referring to the American government, And the backlash that I got for saying genocide is always wrong, it's bonkers. I still can't comprehend it. It's such an easy statement for everyone to agree with. Every single person should have said, amen, amen, yes, agree. Genocide is always wrong and unjustifiable. And yet people read in between the lines and said that this must be you're saying this is happening, and it's like, no. But people, that is literally you applying your emotion, and it's utterly illogical. And I think we are living in times right now where it's really scary to see how much emotion people are having, that basic statements. And if I tweeted right now, pedophilia, no matter where it happens in in the world, is always wrong. Is that a statement at certain times okay? Is that statement at certain times not? So I have been trying to understand really what's going on, and the only thing that I can come up with is that people are highly emotional and they're not thinking straight right now. Speaker 6: Yeah. Yeah. That that's that's an eternal statement. Right? It's it's true regardless of what's happening. I I wanna just reinforce this because you bring up a really important point. And for the record, I've always gotten along well with Ben. I've known Jeremy for a long time, but I I call balls and strikes where I see it. And, Candace, I think it's been super unfair the way some people have been treating you and and really unfair because look. I know your heart too. I I tweeted this yesterday. Candace Owens flew eighteen hours through a brutal European connection to go to the embassy opening in Jerusalem, and we toured Israel together. And you you and I were on campuses multiple times together defending Israel and defending the Jewish people. And so I just find a lot of the coverage to be, you know, vitten not a lot, but but some people's chattering has been highly emotional. And so let's just you talked about this in the Tucker interview, Candice. If somebody in the audience is a very pro Israel person, can you bring them up to speed as how their cause is actually weakening by how they are going after allies? And I'm afraid that they are diluting and cheapening the term antisemitism the same way they've done with racism. Speaker 9: There's no question that they've diluted it. People are not even blinking now to be called an antisemite because, you know, when you start with Richard Spencer and you end with Charlie Kirk and you say everybody's an antisemite and everybody's trafficking in antisemitic tropes, you've just lost the plot. I mean, it's in everybody from Joe Rogan to Tucker Carlson last night for God knows what reason being called an anti Semite, and it's it's just completely a losing argument. And so it's funny because I've had some, you know, pro Israel friends that reached out to me and were saying, well, we're just trying to help you. And this time I asserted myself and I said, you need to listen to me. It's obvious to everybody that's looking around right now that there has been a loss in support for Israel, and that's not because any person agrees with what happened on October 7. We have all said on our platforms multiple times that what happened on October 7 is completely abhorrent, but it has a lot to do with the reaction of going after allies for asking questions, for trying to remain not neutral, but humane throughout this and saying that it is always sad. Like people were upset when I said it's always sad when you see a dead child. And some of the upset said, well, can't say that unless you say that also they were just being used as human shields. It's no, you can feel sympathy, you can feel empathy for individuals always, no matter what is going on. You don't need to gauge or jump into a political debate to acknowledge that you're still a human and you have a human response to seeing a dead child. And so what I have said from the very actually, before any of this on my show, is that when you use terms too much and you refer to everybody as something, whether it is a racist, a sexist, a homophobe, you will then find that those words have no power. And I do think that part of the frustration that some people that are parishial are having is trying to understand why this word has no power anymore. And I can explain it over and over, but I can't help people understand it. You saw it happen with Black Lives Matter. First, people were so scared of being called a racist. It was such a horrible smear, horrible libel, like what do I do to not be called that? And then as they started calling everything racist, you started realizing air was racist. And the CNN articles were saying, you know, white people blinking was racist. It became, okay, now we know that this word actually doesn't mean what you're saying, it just means that you want me to submit to whatever it is that you're saying very easily because you've used a smear. You've called me a holocaust snire, you've called me an anti Semite, You've said my silence is violence. And actually what you're trying to do is you're trying to assert control over me while claiming that you are the victim in this. But actually you're trying to assert power over me. And that's not the way to do it. You have to be well intended. And Dennis Prager has always made that point, by the way, for years and years that you have to be very careful when you use a word like that because it will lose power very fast. And unfortunately, his warnings were not heated in this circumstance and people are just don't believe it when you when things people are being called anti Semitic anymore. Speaker 6: Dennis warned us about this. He said an attack used too much loses its power. And you and I both Right. Were kind of we we both still consider Dennis a great friend and a great teacher. And Dennis says he's very careful using that label. He said, because I we want it when we need it, when there's a legit antisemite. And throwing it around as a thought terminating cliche or a means of control or hyper emotional does no one a good service. So so, Candace, let me ask you, because not everyone listens to your show, which is excellent. Everyone should subscribe to her show. There there's a lot of not not a lot. There's a fair amount of rumor or mystery of what you stand on on the war. Can you just the floor is yours. What do you what is your position? Because I think people are completely misinterpreting your views of the Jewish people of what's happening in Israel. Just explain to our audience just to kinda cut off the rumors at the pass. Speaker 9: Yeah. Thank you so much for asking, and and that's what I've said is nobody even asks anymore. And then when you give them an answer and you say, I've said this on my show multiple times, then they say to you, well, I don't listen to your show and, you know, you should tweet it. I'm like, well, my show is posted the full show is posted on Twitter every single day. Oh, well, I don't follow this account. So it becomes not about whether or not what you said or what you didn't say, it becomes about whether or not they were on Twitter at the moment and saw what you said. Otherwise, it doesn't count. You know? And so that's been very interesting. And again, a way to assert power and control and to say that you need to say it when I am online and on whether it's Instagram or Facebook or Twitter. I if I didn't see it, it didn't actually happen, which is completely foolish. But I have not shifted my views at all at at all when it comes to Israel and Palestine, whether it is Ukraine or Russia, whether it is Afghanistan. America has issues at home. We do not need to be sending more money overseas. It is the perspective that is held by Thomas Massey, is now being harassed and being called an anti Semite for his consistent voting against sending any dollar overseas throughout his entire career, right? He has not changed, he has not switched up, so this is not something that is being guided by a hatred or a love of people based on their race at all. It is just my policy, my stance is that America is falling apart. The politicians that are opining on stage and saying, well, we can do both. Look around you, obviously we can't. America is in steep decline educationally, socially, and morally. And I have also been clear that I understand the sentiments coming from white Americans that are saying, why are we suddenly being told now to care about the university debacle? Well, we have been calling this out for years. And Charlie, the you're perfect person to speak about this. You and I have traversed universities. We have been drowned out. We have been harassed. We have been chased out of restaurants for our ideas That's correct. As conservatives, and nobody cared. We couldn't get people to stop funding these universities. We could not get people to understand how bad the problem had become when you actually had professors, forget the students that were protesting, you had professors that were tweeting, all I want for Christmas is a white genocide. I believe that was at Drexel University in Pennsylvania, and that faculty member was protected, calling openly for genocide of white people. So it is a fair question. It is a fair critique when people say, why are you telling us this is a problem now? And this has a problem that many of us have been fighting for the last decade, and it seemed like nobody cared. And so by being fair in that assessment, by recognizing what white people have gone through in this country, by recognizing this, what I consider myself to be America first stances of the problems that are happening in this country, And by saying that I do not want to be involved in another Middle Eastern conflict, no matter where the stage is. People hear that in this moment as some form of antisemitism. It's not. It's consistency. It is the reason that I quoted Thomas Sowell on last night's episode that he has a quote about the civil rights era. He's referring to black America in this quote, but saying, when people are used to special treatment, sometimes being treated the same can feel like discrimination. And it's not discrimination to say that the obvious truths that we are facing in this nation. You can debate that academically, but don't be disingenuous and call people anti Semites for holding the same decisions that they have always held for the last decade. Speaker 6: Yeah. Your position has large agreement in many political circles. By the way, it's also held by people from Thomas Massey to Dennis Kucinich to Rand Paul to a certain extent. And you can have dis disagreements without having to throw around some of those vile labels imaginable. Candace, we're gonna continue after the break. Subscribe to the Candace Owens podcast. Candace is special. We have her back a 100%. And let's just take a pause. What's really going on here? That's what we're gonna talk about after the break. Email is freedom@CharlieKirk.com. Speaker 19: My wife gave birth to the couple's first child, and Doug couldn't be there, Charlie. He was not present at the birth of his first child because he he was in Federal District Court the following day in New York City awaiting awaiting sentencing. It's just another aspect of this case that's heart wrenching and troubling on every level. We've talked about it previously. The First Amendment problem. The Fifth Amendment problem, and with respect to the conduct of the trial itself, the Sixth Amendment problem. And then you compound all of those constitutional issues, which are profound and downright disturbing, and add on top of that the personal impact of missing the birth of your firstborn child and compounded with, hey. You're gonna have to report to prison in January. So that's the latest. Speaker 6: So in in American history, James, has someone been sentenced to federal prison for a speech crime such as this in the history of the republic? Speaker 19: Well, this is this is the first prosecution of its kind, Charlie, under 18 USC two forty one. And, this was a statute that was passed in 1871. It was aimed at preventing the Klan from exercising power and intimidating African Americans and who were who were newly emancipated from slavery. No such prosecution has been brought in the history of our country under that statute. Now, I mean, can can speech provide a, a predicate basis for criminal liability in other contexts? Yes. But it's we've maintained in court filings. This is Speaker 1: Waking up the woke. Speaker 5: Oh, you should get over that quickly. Speaker 1: One brainwashed radical at a time. Speaker 6: That's enough. Speaker 1: It's the Charlie Kirk show. Speaker 6: Preserving liberty means more to me than anything else. You see, we're a very important time in our nation's history. You look around in this room. Don't give me this nonsense that Americans are giving up. That is not true. Okay. America Fest. That's amfest.com. Get your tickets right now. Amfest.com. Biggest speakers in the whole movement, Tucker Carlson and many others. We continue with Candace Owens in just a second. Alright. Candace Owens continues with us. Candace, I'm I'm curious. Has Ben Shapiro called you privately to try to fix this, or is this all just been a public dispute? Speaker 9: It's all been public. I'm I've been, you know, very surprised by it. It's like I said on Tucker last night, something that I think is unfairly a blemish to the Daily Wire because, you know, the four of us, other hosts that work here at the Nashville campus are, we get along very well, you know, and I think that this looks like something that it's not because Ben is not a part of the day to day operations. And I'm not sure why his instinct is always to air something publicly. You know, Charlie, you and I worked for years together. We have had so many disagreements. I would call you, text you directly, yell at you, you know, that's that's healthy, you know? But I I would never just throw out a random tweet and expect you to see it when we were having any of those disagreements. When people text me and say, disagree with Charlie on this, I will just text you, like now up until this day. You know, what did you mean by this? Why are you doing this? Yes. We have to be able to have healthy dialogue and healthy instinct even when we are not understanding each other. Doesn't make it better to let things become public fodder. And it's why I did not want to meet Ben where he was at in engaging anything that was disparaging about him. Because look, I'm 34 years old, I have my third kid on the way. I know how to communicate like an adult. And so, yeah, I don't still yet fully understand where he is coming from. And I do think that we have all tried to be exceedingly understanding of his emotions during this time, as somebody who has familial ties to Israel. And understanding that over the last five weeks, it's been a very emotional time for him. And that's, you know, the human place that I have tried oops. Sorry. Dropped something there. The, you know, the human angle that I have tried to take in trying to perhaps understand why he is airing some of this publicly. Speaker 6: Yeah. Look. I I as I said, I've known known Ben for a long time. I hope he fixes that because leadership should not leadership should warrant the tough conversation and to do it in private. It's by way, it's not good for the movement. It's not good for the Daily Wire. We need the Daily Wire. Need the Daily Wire strong. It's an important company. Those amazing things. Walsh knows Knowles, Jordan, yourself, all that good stuff. So, Candace, fine. Just a couple minutes remaining here. This Israel issue, I'm afraid, is breaking both the left and the right simultaneously in different ways. What can we do to make sure that doesn't happen? On the right. The left can they can go to hell. On the right. Speaker 9: Well, we need to act like conservatives. We need to practice what we preach. We talk about free speech. We can't suddenly buck the trend of free speech because we're angry or we're upset. We talk about the need for more dialogue. We talk about the need for less libel. We talk about the need for less smears in the media. We cannot engage in that. We can't engage in the behavior of left ists just because we have become upset or an issue is close to us. Consistency is what is called upon. We must remain ideologically consistent. I think it's important to call balls and strikes within our own movement, but and I think that that's part of the problem is that many people are not, as I've spent our calls in behaving with consistently conservative principles on these matters. And I'm seeing a lot of behavior that mimics BLM right now. And that is going to, without question, cause a fracturing in the movement by people that are well intended. And look, I think that we were all way already sensing this sort of civil war in the conservative movement. And I think that's best represented by the very different perspectives that even the candidates that are running have. Are we America first? Do we believe that we should be engaging in overseas conflict all the time nonstop? We are, I think, as Vivek Ramaswamy said, going through this sort of adolescence period of trying to define what the conservative party is. And I I think it's changing. I think Trump was a huge part of that sea change, obviously, and and realizing that there's a frustration. I think younger conservatives feel a little disconnected and detached from some of the older conservatives in the movement for certain reasons that have become accustomed to military, industrial complex instincts, and constantly saying that our allegiance somehow be overseas, and they become accustomed to constantly being involved in overseas complex. And I think that we want something different. And the first thing that we want that is something different is healthy debate, and demanding healthy debate. Demanding full throated discussions and not emotional responses no matter what happens. Whether Russia invades Ukraine, we deserve a full throated debate about whether or not we should be sending billions of dollars unaccounted for over to Zelenskyy. And whether or not it's COVID policy, no matter how fearful people are, we deserve to have a full throttle debate about how we live in a COVID era. Do we still have our freedoms or do we become people that are suddenly authoritarian because we have fears? That is the future of the Republican Party that I want to see, is are people that can look back and say, whether you agreed with me or did not agree with me, I remained consistent, and I hope that you respect that. Speaker 6: I'll give some advice. Candace Owens is undefeated, everybody. So be careful fighting Candace Owens. Doesn't end well for you. Candace, God bless. We have your back and have that baby. We'll talk to you soon. Speaker 9: Thank you so much, Charlie. Such a pleasure to always join. Speaker 6: Thank you. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. Enjoy Jack Passoeck. Third hour coming up. Speaker 19: Justice is contemplating just that. Other prosecutions predicated on the spread of misinformation and disinformation. And, Charlie, as we know from the COVID pandemic, today's misinformation and disinformation and conspiracy can be tomorrow's conventional wisdom. It's a path we can't go down. It's Pandora's box that we can't open. It's been opened in mister Mackey's case, and it has to be shut down on an appeal. And, again, that's why we're asking your audience to go to memedefensefund.com. Speaker 6: Douglas Mackey's case is the basis for the the Smith case against Trump. Same law, they escalate and they elevate. So, James, tell us about that. And by the way, it's memedefensefund.com. This impacts every single every single patriot out there that you could you could be a young man who now is a father. He misses the birth of his son so that these cockroaches, these maniacs, these vermin and swine can bring him in front of a judge to put him in federal prison for seven months, and there are no victims. James, I just want you to reiterate that. Who was victimized by his meme? Tell a bad joke and you go to jail? Speaker 19: Well, Charlie, the the government did not put on, did not forecast before trial and at trial, did not put on a single witness that said, I saw this meme. I was confused. And as a result, I texted my vote and didn't exercise my right to go to the polls or vote by mail or whatever other legal mechanism of voting was available to that person at the time. So not a single person, not a single confused voter who did not get to exercise their right to vote. And yet Douglas Mackie is going to prison for seven months anyway under this ruling and under the verdict unless it's overturned on an appeal, which is again why it's why it's so critical that we had the theory of prosecution at off of the past. And and and another thing for your audience to know, you know, we talk a lot of this country about our democracy, and people make allusions to it that our democracy in the case of former president Trump is under attack in many ways in the ways that he's trying to curtail the influence of the administrative state. It's important for your audience to know that Congress repeatedly considered whether or not to create criminal liability around election misinformation and disinformation. They considered various proposals to do that, and they rejected them. It never passed a proposal like this never passed the House or the Senate and and was signed into law by a duly elected president. And yet Mr. Mackey asked to report to prison in January anyway because the administrative state, the deep state, was able to stretch and contort a statute from 1871 to achieve an outcome that was not politically viable or could not be pushed through the congress. And and and that is really what the regime means when it talks about our democracy. It's not about voting. It's not about elected representatives voting. It's about unelected prosecutors and bureaucrats using statutes to enact its will and impose its will on the American people without votes. Speaker 6: Christina Wong tweeted on 11/08/2016, hey, Trump supporters. Skip poll lines at election two thousand sixteen and text in your vote. Text votes are legit or vote tomorrow on Super Wednesday. Christina Wong is still making jokes, was never investigated or indicted, and Christina Wong continues a living a free life. Meanwhile, Douglas Mackie did the exact same thing, even less blunt, by the way, and he is going to federal prison. The website is memedefensefund.com. Everyone should contribute memedefensefund.com. So James, what is your approach for the appeal going to be? First amendment protections, fifth amendment protections, what will your approach be for appeal? Speaker 19: Well, Doug's appellate team will undoubtedly raise arguments under the first, fifth, and sixth amendments. I mean, as the first amendment issues are are are have been talked about quite a bit. The fifth amendment issues relate to the use of a very vague statute. Again, as I mentioned in the opening segment, this is a law that was passed in 1871. And it is the text of the statute bars conspiracies to injure, quote unquote, to injure individuals in their exercise of protected rights. And so one of the arguments I'm sure his appellate team will make is that the statute itself is impermissibly ambiguous and vague, and attack it on on a void for vagueness challenge under the Fifth Amendment for lack of notice under the due process clause. You know, the Sixth Amendment issues relate to, among other things, mister Mackey's defense not being able to cross examine a confidential government witness who was allowed to testify basically under shield on the nature of that individual's ongoing relationship with the FBI. Under the sixth amendment, criminal defendants have a right to cross examine their accusers in public in open court. And one of the problems among others with this prosecution is that Mr. Mackie didn't get to do that in violation of the Sixth Amendment. And again, this is bedrock stuff. I mean, this goes back to the right to confront your witnesses in in public and open court goes back to sir Walter Raleigh, the the the namesake of my hometown, who was locked away in the Tower Of London precisely because he could not cross examine his witnesses in open court. That's why we have the sixth amendment. Speaker 6: Yeah. No kidding. So and then I mentioned this before the break. Is there an equal protection argument here potentially? I mean, they they don't enforce this against Christina Wong who has obviously did the exact same thing. Speaker 19: Right. No. I that's that's another that's another avenue, for sure is the, selective prosecution. Though defendants, in in many cases, try the that argument. And and certainly, in this case, as you pointed out in the open, you've got similarly situated individuals engaged in similar conduct. But I think that's a that's a harder harder case a harder case to make than than some of the other other arguments. That's just my my impersonal view of it. But Doug's appellate team will will handle all of that. Speaker 6: Yeah. The prosecutorial discretion that we give the federal government, is remarkable. James Lawrence, thank you so much. Memedefensefund.com. Help out Douglas Mackie, a young man going to jail because he told a bad joke. You are living in the Soviet Union. James, thank you so much. Speaker 19: Thank you. Speaker 6: Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast receiving thousands of emails regarding the first hour that we did about this New York Times 2024 poll, but we have election day tomorrow. If you live in Virginia, major election day tomorrow. Play cut one. Speaker 20: We've delivered results, and that's why I'm excited about what's gonna be on the ballot. I think we can hold our house and flip our senate. We can keep going because there's so many more important topics for us to focus on. Speaker 6: There's a huge push in Virginia to turn I think they call it the Virginia House of Delegates. Right? To flip it. Going all in on early voting, going all in on ballot chasing. Could this end up demonstrating and showing a path forward? Glenn Youngkin has a serious favorability rating. Could be a template. Could end up being a blueprint for 02/2024. We're we're about to find out how smart Glenn Youngkin is, by the way. Glenn Youngkin avoiding the 2024 race, he's a smart guy. Unlike Ron DeSantis, he's like, yeah. I don't know if I wanna see myself getting into that. Some people say, oh, do you think he'll be vice president? Trump will never pick a vice president taller than him, so that's probably not gonna happen. And so Glenn Youngkin putting together a a blueprint in Virginia. If he stays out of the presidential race and flips the house of delegates and gets behind Donald Trump, I'll have a lot of respect for that man. So I'm cheering for him. I really like what he's doing. He's doing the tough work. He's focusing on governing in Virginia and avoiding some of the national political chatter. Speaker 1: If you wanna wear three masks outside, then listen to public radio. Speaker 10: Fresh air. Speaker 1: Breathe free. It's the Charlie Kirk show. Speaker 6: Welcome back, everybody. Email is freedom@charliekirk.com. I wanna bring to your attention a very important story here, and we have a great guest to walk us through it. So until September, the FCC, the Federal Communications Commission, which we are regulated by here because we are on we are on AM and FM radio, was balanced with two Republicans and two Democrats. Now that it has a Democrat majority, it's starting to enact a very radical social agenda, everybody. And one such radical step just happened. The FCC just recently adopted a, quote, digital discrimination order on a three two party line vote. So here to speak with us today about this is Republican FCC commissioner Nathan Symington, who was appointed by president Trump back in 02/2020. Mister Symington, thank you so much for joining us. Please tell us all about this. Speaker 7: Absolutely. Thanks for having me on, Charlie. So this item that we just enacted at the commission takes a very short section in the 2020. Speaker 6: K. I I I hate to be dark, but it it really it really is something when the FCC guy's Internet is not very good. Is that is that too soon, Blake? I'm kidding. He's a great this is what net neutrality will get you, everybody. Alright. We're gonna get him back in a second. Boy, we've really had we've had the stars aligning with Internet. Everybody, email us freedom@charliekirk.com. We'll get him back. No. This is really important story. All kidding aside. This is why we can't have net neutrality and actually proves the point. The we we've talked before about how the civil rights act passed back in the sixties and all of these civil rights regime laws that followed the the civil rights era laws, I should say. They could be used as skeleton key. Okay, mister Symington. Sorry about that. I don't know what happened, but welcome back. Thanks. Please continue. Speaker 7: Yeah, big tech at it again. So thanks for having me on, Charlie. So as I was saying, this item take the short section in the 2021 infrastructure bill that consists six and uses it to spin out a sprawling government takeover of the Internet. Actions a second six to five zero six did pass with some Republican vote, but its language was not nearly broad enough to support what the Democratic majority just voted to do with it. I'm sure people would not have voted for it if they knew that this was what would follow it. Speaker 6: Well, so look, the the government taking over the Internet sounds very sinister. So I just wanna be very specific. How is the government taking taking over over the the Internet? Internet? I mean, wanna are they gonna, like, nationalize Google? What are they gonna start taking over? Walk us through this. Speaker 7: Absolutely. Well, when people think about the Internet, they think about the sites and apps that they're using. But there's also a lot of physical infrastructure there, and it's very costly. This So is bad in a different way. It's about taking over the physical side, cell towers, fiber optic cables, servers. The justification is that some low income or minority areas have relatively low amounts of high speed internet. The FCC took just three words from the law preventing digital discrimination and decided that these low levels of internet subscriptions show discrimination by cell phone and internet providers just because they exist. Then the majority goes further and says any difference in service can be discrimination. Does one neighborhood have higher prices? Does one place have slower speeds, outdated equipment? If there's any difference, we can call it discrimination and we can find them whatever we want or order them to build whatever they Speaker 6: So what what would the ramifications of this potentially be? Could the FCC just fine you for providing Internet in a racist way as they deem racist? Speaker 7: I mean, pretty much. It's a it's a blank check. They could say, you have to build brand new fiber internet for this one town with 500 people. Some member of congress wants it. And then you have to charge them the same price you charge in Downtown Phoenix, where we'd have 10,000 people on the same line. And if you don't, here's $10,000,000 fine for you. Or here's another illustration. So you're deciding where to build out new fiber service. You're choosing an area between areas where you'd might make 1,000,000 a year versus 2,000,000 a year. The rational decision, of course, is you build out to the area where you're gonna have more uptake. Among other things, that would serve more people. But the FCC could fine you because it turns out that that was a more white area, whereas the $1,000,000 a year area is majority minority. And so the FCC is mandating what amounts to affirmative action and racial quotas for everything that the companies do. Speaker 6: Yeah. So I I wanna I mean, this just sounds like a mafia shakedown. Right? I mean, the the that but I I wanna just make sure we're clear. You said it's a federal government takeover of the Internet. Can you elaborate on that? That specific labeling? Speaker 7: Sure, absolutely. Well, we deal with regulated industries all the time and that's not necessarily takeover. Sometimes it's just everyone coming together and agreeing what they want the industry to look like and putting rules in place. But here there are no standards for when you have to bring a case or not, for how much you can find, for what orders you can give. Basically, there are no rules. And so the real effect is going to be that companies will be terrified because they won't know what they're allowed to do. The real question of what they're allowed to do is going to be determined by how much effort they spend sucking up to the government. And anytime the government wants them to do something, they'll have no choice but to come running and do it because the penalty for not doing that is potentially an endless legal nightmare. Speaker 6: So we've introduced this idea of a skeleton key before. I think Christopher Caldwell's book, Age of Entitlement, talks about how good intentions and a broadly written law can then be really given all the power to the enforcers or to the bureaucrats, and especially for left wing type priorities. Do you think that this fits into the criteria of an idea of a skeleton key law? Speaker 7: Absolutely. So no one is arguing, certainly not me, no one is arguing for the idea that companies should discriminate in how they lay out broadband. But using this idea that any difference in the real world amounts to discrimination is sufficient evidence of discrimination is the way that you turn every three letter letter agency, whether that's us at the FCC, whether that's the Federal Trade Commission, the FBI, the DOJ, whether you turn it in effect into a DEI agency. Every project has to have requirements and preferences, every agency has to be turned into a civil rights agency. So housing and urban development for example, they're trying to make it a legal requirement for cities to build low income housing projects next to or in the middle of any nice neighborhoods they have. There really doesn't seem to be any problem that can't be solved by calling people racist and punishing them for some other unrelated business decision. So another example, another one of the federal telecom agencies, NTIA, I'm an alumnus of them, they're distributing $40,000,000,000 in subsidies to build fiber internet, but they've loaded up the program. It's not just a fiber building program. It's a union labor mandate program. It's a DEI requirement program. It's a preference for government owned internet services program. And so you know, whether or not you think any of those things are a good idea, the point is that they've been put in in regs and therefore the agency has been diverted from its purpose to start doing all of these other DEI type things. Speaker 6: Yeah. So I mean, I guess a question I have is, is corporate America lobbying against all of this? I mean, do the traditional big uglies of the big firms? What where is their stance on this? Speaker 7: Yeah, because you would think that it's in their interest to have as much freedom of operation as possible. And to a degree that's true, and there will be counter pressure coming from some of the big companies in this area. But sometimes they sort of bring it on themselves. So if you look at the item that we just did at the FCC yesterday, when the underlying bill was still in Congress, a lot of corporate lobbyists actually said, we're okay with it. Congress gave them tens of billions in federal handouts as part of the same thing. So despite all those work strings being attached, overall they decided that it was worth it to be bought off. We need them to realize that this is a, in the words of my colleague, Carr, a Faustian bargain. In ten years the handouts will be gone but they'll have this digital equity arbitrage forever. It will never be enough. There's no way that you can ever make someone happy if there's no standard for what compliance is. On the other hand, by the time this comes along, people who were present at the original decision may well have collected their bonuses, retired, it won't be their problem anymore, it'll be our problem. Speaker 6: You stay right there, Nathan. One of the reasons I want to have you on is this is not a rule that's going to get front page New York Times treatment, but it's an excellent example of the subtle yet significant power of the federal bureaucracy, and hundreds of these decisions are made every single year. Not all of them get by the way, not the FCC has a board. Right? Not every agency has a board. And it just so happens, you know, we're here to talk about this. Think about the hundreds of other micro decisions the bureaucracy is making in equity and racial this. It adds up to a less free country. Nathan Symington, please stay right there, excellent job. MyPhD Weight Loss, check it out right now, that's MyPhD D weight loss. It's amazing at myphdweightloss.com. If you want to shed a few pounds, check out my Ph. D weight loss. I have lost over 25 pounds and I have no trouble maintaining it and I feel great. If you need to lose a few pounds, you don't have to do it alone. Give them a call at (864) 644-1900 today and get that first time consultation on your schedule. Your PhD nutritionist can set up a start date together, but don't put off the call. Working that call into my busy schedule a year ago has changed my life and I want the same for you. It is one of the best calls that you can make. So check it out right now, at myphdweightloss.com. Call (864) 644-1900. Call them today right now at myphdweightloss.com. That is myphdweightloss.com. Nathan Symington continues on a very important story that won't get top line coverage, but it goes to show the power of the bureaucracies. Congress didn't vote for this. Bureaucracies just make it up. We'll be right back. Of the people. Patrick, thank you so much for taking the time. Patrick, your book confirms and or the poll, I should say differently. The poll this week from the New York Times confirms the thesis of your book. That's a better way to frame it. Tell us about your book and how also the data is confirming your hypothesis. Speaker 11: So my book is about how essentially the parties, the parties that we knew maybe when I was growing up have just completely reversed themselves in terms of the democrats used to be seen as this party of the working class, party of the people really standing up for the blue collar worker. And really ever since 2016, that really hasn't been true anymore. You've seen this huge reversal in terms of working class voters increasingly voting Republican and voted for Trump in 2016. And more so, a lot of these coal a lot of these groups voted more so in 2020, including Latinos, African Americans. Now that looks to be if if this poll is fracked, it's gonna be like that on steroids in 2024. When you look at Trump being at 22% of the black vote within eight among Hispanic voters, We really are seeing a realignment in our politics. Speaker 6: Yes. So what is driving this? Is it the Republicans embrace of populist nationalist ideas, or is it a combination of academic fantasy ideas of white liberalism that don't resonate with non college educated muscular class voters? Speaker 11: It is it is a it is definitely a combination of both, but I think that, you know, everything that we're seeing out of the college campuses over the last month suggests that the left has really learned nothing about how to moderate their message to appeal to the working class majority of the country who are not interested in these ideas of decolonialization, of intersectionality, of things that are only ideas that only somebody with an advanced degree even could could even fathom. So I I do think that they're just continuing to dig themselves a bigger hole. And you go back to it didn't used to be like this. You go back to as recently as the nineteen nineties. And Bill Clinton, you know, a lot of Republicans didn't like Bill Clinton when he was president, but he is somebody who really moderated his message, said the era of big government is over, signed welfare reform, signed the Defense of Marriage Act. All of these things that, you know, you could not see Joe Biden for all his, like, talk about for all the talk that he is somehow this sort of blue collar working class Democrat. He is just as beholden, I think, to the left as as anyone, and you just don't see that kind of democrat anymore. Speaker 6: Why do you think that is? This Donald Trump obviously changed American politics that will be one of his longest lasting legacies is reshaping the Republican party. Democrats seem comfortable. They don't seem as if they want to win over muscular class voters again. They think they can create a fusion of the permanently government addicted and the hyper educated Boston elite. Why is that? Speaker 11: Well, I think they're going to be net then reduced to that elite. That's what's starting to happen. So this idea is the Democratic Party has always been this coalition of folks who are, you know, these liberals, primarily white liberals, and African Americans, Hispanics, minority voters, right? I mean, has always been kind of the core of the democratic coalition and now we're seeing that break apart where significant chunks of voters in these minority communities have actually started to break off. I know there's been talk about this for decades or poll conservatives have talked about this for decades, but it actually seems to be happening. So what's going on? What's going on is a lot of these groups are actually better off. So you know, under under Donald Trump, Hispanic incomes rose 20%. Speaker 6: Welcome back, everybody. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. It's a very important topic. It's very important. It's not getting a lot of coverage, obviously. Mister Symington from the FCC continues. So I guess the immediate question is, will this affect my own Internet? Speaker 7: Well, it definitely will because the federal government is putting out a huge amount of money for this, but all that money is competing with each other. You know, you can't just wish resources into being by writing a check. Even if you've got the power of the US treasury behind you, there's just physical limitations on how many workers there are, how long it takes to trench and put in fiber, how long it takes to build the tower and hang radios off it, whatever you might want to ask. It's going to make everyone's internet much more over time, more costly and the worst thing is it's going to deflate the value of developing a project. So fewer projects will get developed. Corporations don't just have big plots of money, they go out and get financing just the way that you might take out a construction loan to build an office building or some such. And all of those deals are going to be implicitly deflated by this. So we can expect high priority political areas to get the best results out of this and the forgotten middle to get the worst. Speaker 6: Yeah, that's Can you just kind of speak for a second of how the FCC is composed and how many members of the board are there? Just for the uninitiated to our audience, explain it. And then also explain your purview. Speaker 7: Sure. So with the FCC, there's five of us. That's a recent development because the third Democratic seat was only filled in September. So for most of the Biden administration, there hasn't been a third Democrat and we've been in a two-two situation, which may explain why this item didn't come up until now. But the most important thing about us is that at the commissioner level, we're independent. That means appointed by the president, confirmed by the senate. After that, you cannot get fired unless you're committing crimes. So that lets me get out here and say what I really think without having to worry that that the secretary of something or other is gonna fire me over it. Regarding the purview, so the FCC kinda gets started for two reasons. Number number one, the old AT and T phone monopoly, which was a government backed monopoly that was the alternative. The United States was the only country in the world not to have a socialized national phone system at the time. So we said, no, we're going to let a private company run it, we're just going to supervise it and the FCC was put in place to do that. The other thing was to coordinate radio broadcasting. When radio was a young field, no one knew how to coordinate frequencies and people would just run up the power level and transmitters and try to interfere with each other in the best markets. Obviously, that wasn't workable, so we started a system of assigning frequencies and sort of took it from there. So in the modern day, it's cell phones, it's the phone network, it's also radar, it's satellite communications, undersea cables, pretty much any interstate communication by radio or wire. Speaker 6: So that's very helpful. Thank you. Talk to the processes that there's term limits, right? Is that correct? There are terms on each one of the board members? Speaker 7: Five year terms. Speaker 6: Yeah. And so then what what if there were to be a different winner of the election, like if if Trump, for example, were to win next November, what would that mean for vacancies on the board? Speaker 7: Well, the chairman, or in this case, the chairwoman, it's tradition the chair resigns on inauguration day at So nine Trump's FCC chair, Ajit Pai, still had time left in his term, but he resigned on inauguration day. So the tradition is that every president gets to pick his own chair. Speaker 6: Got it. Me just kind of final question here. You were a federal regulator during the Obama administration. Why were we able to have you come on and say this, and we don't hear this from other agencies like the FBI unless we get a whistleblower? Speaker 7: Oh, I'm sorry, wasn't here for the Obama administration. I took office in 2020. But nonetheless, yes, I'm politically independent. That is a really unique thing about how our agency works, because we have powers which is like the executive, but we also have rulemaking powers which is like the legislative. And so they made us independent so that we weren't beholden to either one of those because it would be a stealing of power from the other branch, if you see what I mean. Now in the case of some other agency, at the end of the day, the person on top may be confirmed by the Senate and nominated by the president, but is not politically independent. They instead they might serve at the president's pleasure. Well, you want to get on the wrong side of the president, that's a very quick way to get transitioned out of your job. Speaker 6: Nathan Symington, thank you so much. Excellent job. Appreciate it. Thank you. Speaker 7: Huge pleasure, Charlie. Take care. Speaker 6: Email us freedomcharleykirk dot com and subscribe on our to our podcast by going right here. This podcast by the way, podcast is doing very well. Number 11 right now in Apple News, so we'll see if that improves throughout the day. We shall see. 11 in Apple News, so please take out your phone and subscribe to the Charlie Kirk Show podcast. Several stories we have yet to hit, so email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com. President Xi comes and visits one of his colonies. He comes home. He wants to see what he's been buying. He wants to make sure that it's been a good investment for the homeland. Our ruler Winnie the Pooh is on the homeland right now. We are back. Speaker 11: American incomes rose 20%. So there no there's no longer the sense that they are need to be dependent on the federal government. You talk to people. I visited the Rio Grande Valley of South Texas, and you talk to people down there and they want to get ahead by their own hard work and are very suspicious of anyone who is on government welfare benefits. I mean, that is a really big concern. When you talk to people down there, see who talk about, like, why is there a Tesla in front of the unemployment office that shouldn't be happening? So it's a very different kind of politics that I think people on the left and, you know, frankly, some people on the right have assumed about about these people. They want they're achieving the American dream. They wanna get ahead, and they realize the Democratic Party is not helping them get there. Speaker 6: So let's just talk pure numbers in the states that matter, Georgia, Wisconsin, Arizona, maybe Pennsylvania. If these trends continue and Republicans get near 50% or at least near an equilibrium within the margin of error with Hispanics and continue to do well with working class whites, but maybe do a little bit worse with upper middle class white voters, What does that mean? How how significant is the growth in the multi class the multiracial middle class to just get one more vote than the other guy? Speaker 11: I mean, I I think that what Trump showed in 2016 and why the election was so close in 2020 was the fact that this coalition of working class whites and the more African Americans, Latinos punches above its weight in the electoral college. You know, when it comes to the states that will actually decide the election, not just the Rust Belt states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, but also states like Arizona, Georgia, and Nevada. You know, those states have tend to have few graduates than the blue states where primarily all these college graduates, people with postgraduate degrees, people who are listening to the crazy ideas coming out of college campuses now. You know, those are concentrated primarily in blue states. So that's why I think Trump or any Republican candidate would have an advantage in the electoral college by appealing and talking to these voters. Speaker 6: Yeah. If you look so the state with the most college degrees is by far by far Massachusetts, and it's that way every single year, I mean, with Boston and all that. And then Colorado is right up there. It's the second, And then it goes Vermont, New Jersey, Maryland, Connecticut. These are these are traditionally democrat states. And then you go from the bottom up, the ones that have the least college edge by the way, that doesn't mean they're stupid. I don't have a college degree. What it means though is that they have different professions. They'll work with their hands, plumbers, electricians, carpenters, oil fields, entrepreneurs. It's not an indictment of their intelligence. And they also but most importantly, Patrick, author of Party of the People, Different Value Systems. Speaker 11: That is absolutely right. This is a group that has never you know, they have never had anything handed to them. They've had to work for what they have. I And think that just they're unified united by a common sense value system, even if they don't vote Republican. I think that, you know, you particularly talk to try talking, I think about the green new deal or this green transition idea within these minority communities. And the polling is pretty clear on that, that when it comes to people really saying you know, all this stuff about global warming is nice and you hear this in focus groups a lot, but it doesn't help me put food on the table. And I think the real the real trigger as much as, you know, as much as Republicans wanna pat themselves on the back for realigning these voters, the real trigger for this has been the absolute failure of the Biden administration to bring down inflation meaningfully. And the fact that, you know, we've had so much inflation has really hit these voters particularly really hard in the wallet. And these are the voters who are actually paying attention to performance. You know, I think if you if you have a college degree, it doesn't necessarily mean you have more accurate ideas about politics or or the world because I think you're primarily, you're very partisan and you're voting. I think you're very committed to existing your existing ideology and whatever information comes out, really just is gonna push you in one direction or the other. This multiracial populist coalition is very pragmatic, is very common sense, and they can see what's happening. Speaker 6: I I wanna keep on diving into this. But a minute remaining a minute and a half remaining, does the does the working multiracial class you're talking about, if the Republican party were to go to all of sudden and nominate like a Mitt Romney or somebody like that, they wouldn't necessarily be on on board for that. Correct? Speaker 11: Well, I think that is it's a little bit I think we are not going back to that kind of Republican party. That said, I do think that there are a number of candidates running who Speaker 1: Warning. You're entering a not safe for the regime media zone. Facts incoming. Speaker 6: Alright, everybody. Welcome back. Email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Xi Jinping is visiting the colony of San Francisco. This whole thing is very bizarre. So first, Gavin Newsellini goes over to China, he does a visit there. Runs over a bunch of Chinese kids when playing basketball. The whole thing's very strange. You take some sort of GQ Vogue photo op on the Great Wall Of China, his shirt unbuttoned. It's very clear that Joe Biden sent Gavin Newsom. And Joe Biden says, hey, pal. I don't want to make the flight. You go. Because I guess they were doing kind of like a a trip swap type thing. And so Gavin goes to China and Xi Jinping comes to America. So Xi Jinping lands and he's coming to see his colony. He's invested so heavily into capturing the elite of America. And boy, they have delivered. So there's several takeaways here that are critically important. The first of which is the most obvious. When I visited Seattle this last summer, it was a mess. It was dirty. It was filled with vermin and swine and homeless people and degenerates and drug addicts and raging ludicicks come up to your car and start beating. It's a disgusting city. And I started talking to one of the people at my hotel. I said, This is unrecognizable. I said, Yeah, but it was actually pretty nice for a couple weeks this summer. I said, Why? I said, What changed? I said, Well, we had the MLB All Star game in Seattle this summer and they cleaned everything up. I said, Well, isn't it really demoralizing that if all the media cameras are coming, they clean everything up and then they don't care afterwards? Yeah, it's demoralizing, also shows they can fix it. This can be fixed. Urban dirtiness can be fixed. Now I find it hilarious that of all the things that motivate them to clean up the streets of San Francisco, it's Jinping. As many people have been commenting, Gavin Newsom gives a long speech assuring San Francisco homeless they can go back to pooping on the streets once Xi Jinping returns back to China. Play cut six. Speaker 21: I know folks say, oh, they're just cleaning up this place because all those fancy leaders are coming into town. That's true because it's true. But it's also true for months and months and months prior to APAC. We've been having different conversations. Speaker 6: You're not as smart as you think you are, Gavin. It's true because it's true. It also shows elections don't mean anything in California. He knows that he's got that job for life if he wants it. Total totalitarian dictator. Maybe he's not that different than Xi Jinping. So Xi Jinping arrives and Gavin greets him. Hey, old pal. How you doing? Xi Jinping's motorcade drives through San Francisco and it's noticeably clean. It's the cleanest San Francisco has been in multiple generations. Who who would have known? All we have to do to clean up the streets of San Francisco is fly in dictators. Playcut 64. Where are the American flags? What's with all the Chinese flags? Not a single US flag. But to be fair, they probably didn't remove any. You know what they probably had to remove, though? Some gay flags. CCP's not big into pride. It's not a it's not a core Confucian value to have men become women. So they're meeting Xi Jinping and Biden decides to fly in. He's like, oh, I can take the cross country flight. Let's go to cut one zero seven. Speaker 0: Gavin was ready to take the relationship to the next level until he found out there was someone else, Joe Biden. The president flew in on Air Force One. Now Newsom had competition. When Chi saw Joe, they couldn't keep their hands off each other. As Joe likes to brag, he spent more time with Chi than anyone else. Not to mention the fact that Chi's guys bribed the Biden family. The chemistry was unmistakable. Speaker 2: I've never doubted what you've told me in terms of your candid nature in which you speak. Speaker 3: I still remember our interactions very vividly, and it always gives me a lot of thoughts. Speaker 6: Thoughts or thoughts? That's the question. So look. The Chinese Communist Party is the great enemy of America, but he comes in and gets a hero's welcome here in the country. And just to be fair, you should always be talking to leaders even if they're their enemies. I totally supported Trump having him over to Mar A Lago, but you gotta be very clear about what you stand for. So Xi Jinping comes to San Francisco. Now the one thing we can hope for is Xi Jinping goes back to China, and he gives a big speech. We are no longer embracing left wing Marxism. He's like, that's a mess. Like, he goes back, and he just denounces the whole thing. It's like, jeez. That's what we're heading towards. But understand, the bromance between Gavin, Biden, and Xi Jinping, it's deeper than you might think. China is not an enemy. They're not a competitor. China is the goal. We've said for quite some time that the lack of understanding of Maoism will be our downfall. We are living through a cultural revolution. Xi Jinping runs the Chinese Communist Party. The Chinese Communist Party is the same project started by Mao Zedong. Mao Zedong launched a cultural revolution. He had a moment where people could speak out and there could be free speech until repressive tolerance came. Struggle sessions were Maoist. There were 10 different categories that were created in Mainland China, five for fascists, five for communists. Parents were incentivized to train their kids in the communist way, and the kids were incentivized to turn in their parents if they were not a 100% behind the party. The American leadership look at Xi Jinping and they privately say, man, it must be awesome. Must be awesome, mister Xi Jinping, that you have all this power, that you can do whatever you want whenever you want to do it. The American ruling elite, Gavin Newsom and Joe Biden, they wanna be more like Xi. They don't look at this as a conflict between two countries. They look at America hopefully to become closer to the Chinese Communist Party model. Cut one zero eight, Winnie the Pooh says that China wants to be friends with The US. Yeah. Even though they attack us cyber, they send in their kids to our schools to spy on us, they buy up land near military bases, they dump, steal, solar panels, and critical infrastructure and plastic. They pump fentanyl into our country in the reverse opium wars. They have digital fentanyl through TikTok. By the way, did China ever pay for COVID? Did they ever pay for COVID for creating a virus in the laboratory? Did anyone even mention it? Of course not. Joe Biden is there to go kiss the ring of who's been paying for the lifestyle for the Biden family for years. Play cut one zero eight. Speaker 4: Whatever stage of development it may reach, China will never pursue hegemony or expansion and will never impose its will on others. China does not seek spheres of influence and will not fight a cold war or a hot war with anyone. China will remain committed to dialogue and post confrontation and build partnerships instead of alliances. It will continue to pursue a mutually beneficial strategy of opening up. The modernization we are pursuing is not for China alone. We are ready to work with all countries to advance global modernization featuring peaceful development, mutually beneficial cooperation, and common prosperity, and to build a community with a shared future for mankind. Speaker 6: I mean, everything he's saying is a lie. They they lie professionally. They don't have a moral code like we do in the West. It's all about power. It's all about expanding the Chinese Communist Empire. They own ports of entry all throughout Africa and South America. The Belt and Road Initiative is the recreation of taking over the world. I mean, I can go through the list, and our leaders take it. Our leaders say, oh, yes. Must be so great. What great relations that we have. In a rare moment of honesty, Joe Biden calls Xi Jinping a dictator, Not exactly smart diplomacy, but honestly, I respect the candor. Plague at one zero nine. Are we becoming more like China or is China becoming more like America? The promise of free trade and the promise of neoliberalism is that eventually China would become like America. They become a liberal democracy with private property rights and entrepreneurship and free speech. We were sold by the Mitt Romneys of the world and the Paul Ryans of the world and George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. We were sold by the Bill Clintons, and even to a lesser extent, Ronald Reagan, that eventually China would liberalize and they would just become an open minded country because the more we traded them, the more it changes their values, and the opposite happened. The more that we have traded with China, they have got wealthier, but they've also become less free. They've become far more totalitarian, less open to different and new ideas. Most Americans never used to worry about the Chinese Communist Party until Trump woke us up. And understand the Chinese Communist Party owns Joe Biden, owns many members of the American government. Here's a montage of Joe Biden saying the rise of China was good, of course, because he's on the payroll. He's a traitor to The United States The United States, and he's a agent of the Chinese Communist Party, play cut 60 '7. Speaker 2: Let me be clear. I believed in 1979 and said so, and I believe now that a rising China is a positive development, not only for the people of China, but for The United States and the world as a whole. We want to see China rise, to continue to rise in a responsible way that will benefit you most, China, because you have an important role to play. A rising China can be a significant asset for the region and the world and selfishly for The United States. Speaker 6: He is an agent of the Chinese Communist Party. Are your kids or grandkids spending hours on YouTube and Netflix getting indoctrinated by woke ideology? It's time for you to take control over what your kids are watching and what is going on to shape them as they grow up. Sherwood is a content platform that offers ad free wholesome entertainment for families with traditional values. Make no mistake, the left is pushing their CRT and their trans agenda and it's making its way into kids entertainment. Sherwood has a library of audiobooks, ebooks, videos from classics like Velveteen Rabbit and Treasure Island, one of my favorites, to timeless cartoons and other entertaining content. It's a lifetime subscription to Sherwood Kids. It's usually $750, but this month only you can get a lifetime subscription for just $299. Just use promo code Charlie. Sign up today at sherwoodkids.com. That is sherwoodkids.com. Take back control over your kids' entertainment. Are you tired of playing defense with your kids' entertainment? Well, today, children can't even walk in the library, turn on the TV without seeing progressive nonsense and agendas everywhere. That's why we love Sherwood. It's ad free, wholesome kids entertainment platform that shares your value values. Sherwoodkids.com. Wonderful company. Check it out. Special deal. Sherwoodkids.com. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Open up your podcast app and type in Charlie Kirk show. So much more to cover. Email is freedom@CharlieKirk.com. We'll be right back. Speaker 11: By and large, capitalize on this on these trends. And you see it in a place like Virginia with Glenn Youngkin, you know, who did really well, and we'll see, you know, in the election tomorrow, you know, how well his candidates do. But I do think that, you know, we are permanently on a trajectory, I think here, where people are gonna have to, you know, Republicans are gonna have to realize, you know, it's not, you know, it's not gonna be the case that, you know, you're fully going to go back to where we were before Trump. And I think people in the establishment need to understand that too. Speaker 6: Patrick Raffini, stay right there. We have you for another segment. I encourage people to check it out. Party of the People inside the multiracial populist coalition remaking the GOP. So, Patrick, if you were advising the Republican party to go into 02/2024, there is a open question. Do you try to run up the score in the rules and go straight working class voter, or do we just kind of forget the upper middle class suburban type voter? Is or is it a balance of both for every messaging you do, you know, towards suburban? You might turn off some of the working class folks, or there are issues that can bridge the divide. What would you say, Patrick Rafini? Speaker 11: I think you always have to look at the issues that will bridge the divide because you're gonna you're gonna kill two birds with one stone that way. But what I do think that right now, are very concerned about the border. People are very concerned about the economy and the state the continued high inflation, the fact that, you know, prices are 20% higher than they were when Joe Biden was inaugurated. People are concerned about crime. We used to think about a lot of those issues as base issues, but the failure on those issues has been so great that those are not just base issues anymore. Those are issues that really resonate across the spectrum with independents, moderates, and they also resonate with Hispanics and African Americans too, especially. So I think like, we have plenty of issues. If we can stay focused, I think on those three issues, I think Republicans are gonna be in good shape. Speaker 6: Yeah. And I mean, so the the other question I have for you is that can another candidate other than Trump continue a multiracial type working class coalition? We've seen a little bit of evidence of that with DeSantis in 02/2022, but it hasn't really been replicated. It seems as if rural turnout dives a little bit, that kind of mystery voter is hard to replicate. Can it be done? Speaker 11: I think it can. I think it can in the sense of, yeah, you you have seen it. You you definitely have seen it with DeSantis. You've seen it with a candidate like I mentioned Junkin as well. I do think that in the sense of, I mean, you may have, and when you have candidates like, look, mean, MAGA was not a huge fan of Brian Kemp, but in Georgia, he carried that state in a landslide. Really, he carried by eight points and he won in all the places Trump won, but he added back some of those suburban voters. So, yeah, I think that any of these candidates. Speaker 6: Alright, everybody. Welcome back. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. Story and politico dot com. Very interesting. We are mentioned. You guys are mentioned, actually, all of us together. Ronna McDaniel is under siege, and her critics concede she's likely to survive. For now, we shall see. She is likely to survive for the time being. It goes on to say that the members of the one sixty eight in the RNC, they think she's doing a great job. I wanna read one of these here. So there's a guy, Jeff Kaufman, brave soul from Iowa. He thinks that Rana's doing amazing. Having worked with chairwoman Rana over the past two election cycles, I could not have asked for a better partner to ensure help us ensure historic up and down republican victories in Iowa. Without her support, Iowa and the Iowa caucus would not be the first in the nation. She has my full confidence as we head into the thick of caucus season. Okay. That that's that's not an unfair statement as far you have to you have to fight for your state. You have to fight for your state so you get you get the caucus, but is she gonna help us win the White House? And by the way, Jeff Kaufman. It's not because of Rana that Iowa has turned red. It's because of Trump. Trump has turned Iowa from battleground state to a deep red state. Period. End of story. Iowa was a fifty fifty state. Barack Hussein Obama won it in 02/2008, and Iowa is now deep red because of Trump, not because of Rana. But Jeff Kaufman, your argument is that we should have Rana remain the chair because you guys got the Iowa caucus first. Like, that's a really I'm I I get that's what you have to do. You should fight for that in Iowa. I believe by the way, believe Iowa should be first. That's a bad argument for why she should stay chair of the RNC. We're mentioned here, quote, Charlie Kirk urged Trump to push for a change in leadership. Quote, there's still time to course correct on many of the structural problems of the RNC, Kirk said in a statement, but we need to move Kirk and Turning Point have tried to unseat McDaniel in the latest RNC election, but we fell short. That is correct. We did fall short. In the aftermath of last week's elections, the simmering frustration with McDaniel has become far more pronounced. North Carolina GOP chair Michael Watley says, I was disappointed with a vague statement. What the RNC is trying to do is give everyone of these candidates an opportunity to communicate their message to the American people. Hey, Michael Watley. Why aren't you disappointed that we got our clock cleaned? Last Tuesday? There is a petition. It's firerana.com. It's brought to you by Vivek Ramaswamy. Laura Ingram kinda butted heads with Rana. Play cut 13, please. Speaker 22: Why should you retain your job given the track record of the party under your leadership? And to that, what do you say? Speaker 23: Well, first, I'm gonna continue to focus on Joe Biden and Democrats. And I think there was a moment missed during that debate by Vivek to talk about the fact that we still have 13 American hostages in Israel. The fact that for the first time ever in the history of either party, we had a Jewish co sponsor for a debate, and we are in very perilous times in our country. Speaker 6: No. No. I'm sorry. Enough gaslighting. Are you a winner or a loser? Enough of the fluff. Okay? And by the way, I'm so tired of this. I don't do messaging. I do messaging. I can't spend money on state races. I to get your act together. Okay? It's always it's always a dick it's like a escape hatch. It's like constantly hold on a sec. I can't pin this thing down. Play cut 14. Speaker 22: One of the things, Arana, that happened was, I I think in Virginia, people were wondering where the money was, whether they were gonna get some help from the RNC. And I I know at one point, you said that that you were not asked for money in Virginia, but a source, Republican source familiar with the Youngkin team in Virginia told the angle late tonight that that is false. And there, meaning your story keeps changing. Anyone who thinks Virginia Republicans wouldn't wanna help when we knew we'd be outspent isn't being serious. You know, Rana, they were outspent by $8,000,000. Speaker 23: Glenn Youngkin and did a phenomenal job and he raised a lot of money. A lot of people don't understand fundraising. I can't raise state dollars. I don't get unlimited convention and and state dollars. And these were state house and state senate races. The r n c gets federal committee. So, I mean, come on. Speaker 6: First of all, what what are you talking about? You you I think there are segregated accounts, but is it not true that the r n c data is used by Republican candidates up and down the ballot? True or false? So and this is like a major slippery gaslighting thing. And when the great Larry O'Connor asked you about it, you said, oh, they didn't need the money. You didn't use that. It's either you can or you can't. Do you do messaging? We don't do messaging. It's the candidate's fault. Here's the essence. Losing. You gotta go. You gotta go. It's not personal. You're a sweet person. Go find something else to do. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. See you guys tomorrow.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/zCr1z8kYfg

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

👀Charlie Kirk's “Security” and Their Ties to Israel (I'm adding “NOT SUICIDAL” to my bio) Charlie Kirk's private security was handled by a detail that sometimes included former Secret Service agents and U.S. Marines. The security team, contracted by his organization Turning Point USA, was led by former FBI agent Greg Shaffer. The internet (and possibly Shaffer himself) is now distancing him from Kirk’s security. If you search for a connection, it will tell you that Shaffer Security Group stopped working with Kirk in 2022. Despite the supposed security expertise, this is Shaffer's comment about the Kirk shooting: “We typically anticipated close-range threats...” There is no proof of any disconnection. A single AP article making that claim yesterday is the only source. You can clearly see that Charlie had the same security personnel in 2022 that he did at the shooting. The people in charge of Kirk’s security essentially did nothing to secure the area or inspect rooftops prior to or during the event, despite the fact that it would have been a simple four-man job that could have included cameras for the event. After the shooting, the crime scene was not secured, and they allowed the staff to simply pack up the area. 🧵 @HarrisonHSmith @IanCarrollShow

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/cOFlQXK14Q

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk Assassination Master Thread The Evidence (DEEP THREAD🧵ONGOING)

Video Transcript AI Summary
"If Bibi Netanyahu, if he does something I don't like and if I criticize it, am I, like, a bad Christian? Absolutely not." "What I find strange is that we're able to criticize the American government sometimes in the Christian world with more freedom than the Israeli government." "To be pro Israel means you believe in the nation of Israel Mhmm. Not necessarily the government of Israel." "When you when Joe Biden was president, you and I were what we loved America, but we detested our government. And those two those two things beautifully coexisted." "Exactly. And what they don't want is they don't wanna be called bad Christians Mhmm." "If they challenge a foreign government, which is what happens so often. Right. Like you're a bad Christian if you have a question about a foreign government." "Right. That creates backlash that I don't think people understand."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Bibi Netanyahu, if he does something I don't like and if I criticize it, am I, like, a bad Christian? Absolutely not. What I find strange is that we're able to criticize the American government sometimes in the Christian world with more freedom than the Israeli government. To be pro Israel means you believe in the nation of Israel Mhmm. Not necessarily the government of Israel. When you when Joe Biden was president, you and I were what we loved America, but we detested our government. And those two those two things beautifully coexisted. Yeah. You never you never once said, hey, I'm I'm out on America. On America's right. Exactly. And what they don't want is they don't wanna be called bad Christians Mhmm. If they challenge a foreign government, which is what happens so often. Right. Like you're a bad Christian if you have a question about a foreign government. Right. That creates backlash that I don't think people understand.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@enduring_light I do. it's blocked. @xdownloaderbot download this

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@PinkDragonflies 😂Idk if that's a good idea.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@PinkDragonflies I found this one.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@ThPrnnlPhlsph Scroll down

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@JamesAFreeman Scroll down. I'm sure it's ok now. Everyone concerned has it now.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@zKillian https://t.co/HD63I7jTs5

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

The Charlie Kirk Show November 16, 2023 | FULL Please Spread/Download/Post

Video Transcript AI Summary
On The Charlie Kirk Show, topics span Gavin Newsom’s Beijing date and Joe Biden’s reception of Xi Jinping in San Francisco, then pivot to Elon Musk’s Twitter controversy over a pivotal exchange about anti-Semitism and Jewish donors financing anti-white causes. The program cites Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson, and notes AIPAC’s plan to spend $100 million to defeat the Squad. Seamus Brunner’s Controllogarchs argues Bill Gates, George Soros, Mark Zuckerberg, and Klaus Schwab push a globalist AI-and-patent regime, including food patents, digital IDs, CBDCs, and abortion-pill profits. The show covers Douglas Mackey’s seven-month prison sentence for a meme-related conviction and his ongoing appeal. Heather McDonald discusses alleged anti-white hostility and crime statistics. The FCC’s digital discrimination order, a three-to-two vote, would enable broad DEI-driven internet regulation and ‘skeletal’ legality. The broadcast emphasizes free speech and multiracial populist realignment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Charlie Kirk show begins in one minute. The Charlie Kirk show begins in thirty seconds. The Charlie Kirk show begins in ten seconds. Speaker 1: The Charlie Kirk show starts now. Speaker 0: But today was supposed to be Gavin Newsom's day. After a romantic first date in Beijing where Gia showed Gavin his exquisite birds, intertwined trees, custom toboggans, Gavin thought he was a shoo in for a second date. She was flying into Gavin's hometown, San Francisco. And when Gavin found out, he grabbed the broom and cleaned up. Sorry, vagrants. I have a date. He waited for Chi at the airport, marveled at him as he descended onto the tarmac. And the way Gavin looked at Chi was kinda like how Taylor Swift looks at Travis Kelce. Gavin was ready to take the relationship to the next level until he found out there was someone else, Joe Biden. The president flew in on Air Force One. Now Newsom had competition. When Chi saw Joe, they couldn't keep their hands off each other. As Joe likes to brag, he spent more time with Chi than anyone else. Not to mention the fact that Chi's guys bribed the Biden family. The chemistry was unmistakable. Speaker 2: I've never doubted what you've told me in terms of your candid nature in which you speak. Speaker 3: I still remember our interactions very vividly, and it always gives me a lot of thoughts. Speaker 4: Whatever stage of development it may reach, China will never pursue hegemony or expansion and will never impose its will on others. China does not seek spheres of influence and will not fight a cold war or a hot war with anyone. China will remain committed to dialogue and impose confrontation and build partnerships instead of alliances. It will continue to pursue a mutually beneficial strategy of opening up. The modernization we are pursuing is not for China alone. We are ready to work with all countries to advance global modernization featuring peaceful development, mutually beneficial cooperation, and common prosperity, and to build a community with a shared future for mankind. Speaker 5: Let's talk about our dependence on China. Today, we're actually talking about Xi Jinping, picking on Donald Trump's word vermin to talk about that status quo. You know what's vermin? What's running around San Francisco on a given day before Gavin Newsom cleaned it up on a dime to roll out the red carpet for Xi Jinping. If he could do that for Xi Jinping, he could have done it on ordinary day, and yet we're here sitting talking not about the substance of that, but on one word that Donald Trump said in some speech in Miami. This is what's wrong with the mainstream media. Focus on the substance, and let's have an actual policy debate rather than talking to a presidential candidate instead of the policy substance of what's actually going on in the country, picking on some word that Donald Trump said on a certain day and asking me for comment on it. Speaker 1: You see, we're in a very important time in our nation's history. You look around in this room. Don't give me this nonsense that Americans are giving up. That is not true. Okay, get your tickets. Amfest.com. Amfst.com. Amfest.com. Huge speakers to be announced tomorrow. Mass of speakers. Can't wait to share that all with you. Excellent event last evening in Reno, Nevada. Really great people. We packed it out 1,300 patriots. Telling you the remnant is strengthening. It really is amazing to see. So God bless all of you that attended our event last evening. Lots to cover today. We got Candace Owen joining the show. We got so much stuff happening. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. We're about to get started. Speaker 6: The Charlie Kirk show. Every day is a battle for your mind raging. Information coming from every angle with the will to deceive. Fear not. You found the place for truth. The voice of a generation that still has the will to believe in the greatest country in the history of the world. This is the Charlie Kirk show. Buckle up. Here we go. Speaker 1: Hello, everybody. Radio stations across the country. Honored to be with you. You can email us as always freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Excellent event last evening in Reno, Nevada. It's great to see so many of you. I cannot emphasize enough the win for liberty, the win for humanity that the liberation of Twitter has meant for all of us. It's remarkable. Liberating Twitter from what it once was to what it is now is a win for the narrative. It's a win for truth. It's a win as we try to fight back against this uniparty regime, the tyrants, and the authoritarian dictators that are running the country. Elon Musk, even if they shut down Twitter today, will go down as a major hero for allowing us to be able to speak, to question narratives, to get the truth out. Elon Musk got himself in a little Speaker 7: bit of Speaker 1: trouble yesterday. Elon Musk responded to a tweet that I actually don't think the tweet is that smart. I think one part of it is legit, but I think another part of it is not so great. But the essence of what Elon was responding to is a major thought crime in America that the world's wealthiest man would comment on this is historic. So here's the tweet and it's responding to a video and the video was basically a white father with his white son saying to his son, Hey, you think that, you know, you're posting online all this anti Semitic stuff, why don't you go and say this to these Jewish families face? Pretty powerful advertisement. This is the ad, okay? It's about a minute long, it's a powerful ad, and then a person on Twitter responded to this advertisement, and then Elon responded to the person responding to the advertisement. It's important. Bear with us. Because right now, Elon Musk is being targeted like never before. Elon Musk was supposed to speak at a summit today, and he's been canceled. They don't want to hear from Elon Musk because they are tarring and feathering him as an anti Semite. They've come after this program for calling us anti Semites. They're coming after Elon Musk for calling, they're calling him an anti Semite. So here's the advertisement. It's a powerful ad. Play Cut 79. I saw what you've been posting. Hitler was right. I didn't teach you that. You hide behind your screen, spewing all this hatred and ugliness. You got something you wanna say? Get out of the truck and say it to their faces. Okay. So that that advertisement then was responded to by this person, the artist formerly known as Eric. Quote, okay. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. I am deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest swear word, Let's just say tiniest crap now about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. You want truth said to your face? There it is. Now, let me just say, this is not is not a very well written tweet. I said it's very confusing. I'll go through what they're basically saying here. Half of this tweet is true, half of it I don't like. You want the truth said to your face? There it is. Elon responds and he says you have said the actual truth. Now we don't know what part Elon is saying is the actual truth, so let's go through this. Again, it's double negatives and misuse of the word disinterested. It's a strange tweet that Elon pinpointed on here. But the first part is absolutely true. Let's go to this. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. Now, I don't like generalizations. Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true the Anti Defamation League was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left wing anti white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke and it wasn't just ADL, it was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges. Right? Mark Rowan, Leon Kaufman. Can we get that full list? It's very powerful. The part of the so that's totally true. And by the way, Tucker Carlson reinforces this. So I'm gonna kinda it was quite a day on the Internet. Tucker Carlson was inter interviewing Candace Owens. We have Candace Owens coming up next hour. And Tucker Carlson mentions that Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. We said this, by the way, last week, and people came after us. We came we actually said it in a different way. We said, I'm glad that Jewish Americans are reconsidering their financing of cultural Marxism. And people misunderstood it intentionally and slandered us as being anti Semites. But listen to this, Tucker Carlson is completely correct by saying this, that the philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country. Play Cut 92. Speaker 8: However, then I thought, well, wait a second. If the biggest donors at, say, Harvard have decided, well, we're gonna shut it down now. Where were you the last ten years when they Speaker 9: were going Speaker 8: for WeisGenocide? You were allowing this, and then I found myself really hating those people actually. That you're okay with that? On what grounds were you okay with that? Speaker 9: And I this is what I've been trying to explain to the pro Israel lobby that what you are seeing is lack of support, is people that are asking the question is where were you? Yeah. As we have endured all of this. You were paying Speaker 8: for it actually. Speaker 9: Right. You were Speaker 8: paying for it. Speaker 9: You were you were paying for it. Speaker 8: Because you were calling my children immoral for their skin color. You paid for that. And I don't So why shouldn't I be mad at you? I don't understand. Speaker 1: So what Tucker is saying is similar to part of the tweet that Elon isolated that is true. That let's just say liberals, but that includes Jewish financiers of liberal causes didn't really care about University of Chicago having courses that saying, you know, the problem with whiteness. They didn't really care about American Express saying that we must eliminate whiteness. They didn't, in fact, they were supportive of it. A lot of liberals were okay with critical race theory, diversity, equity, inclusion. ADL went all in on the BLM type narrative and ADL is one of many different organizations that were perfectly fine with the growing anti white wave. Now to be clear, many of these Jews did not fully understand what they were financing. Their intentions were probably pretty good. As we've said, intentions mean next to nothing here. And I'm sure some of the intentions weren't so good, but let's just attention to the side. I'm not that interested in intentions. I'm interested in actions. Okay? Intentions are very hard to pinpoint. We get too caught up in the conservative movement on intentions. I learned this from the great Dennis Prager, who says stop focusing on intentions, focus on the actions. It's a much better way to judge whether or not something is right or wrong. Intentions, as I've said before, and there's a video that went viral, the Nazis thought they were doing good. They convinced themselves that they were doing good, when in reality, they were doing some of the greatest evil in the history of the species. Again, So Hamas thinks they're doing good. I could go through all this, but they're doing evil. So I'm not convinced that somebody's intentions are what matter. Many Jewish financiers culturally given money to George Washington University, Columbia, Yale, Dartmouth over and over and over again. Hundreds of millions of dollars, billions of dollars financing many nonprofits that many of them are now recognizing and realizing this was a bad idea. So I'm going to build this out because the second part of the tweet I don't like, and it ties into some news that is not so good for AOC. It's not good for Ayanna Pressley. I'm going to isolate that in just a second. But let me just say before I talk about my Patriot supply, it is sloppy. It is shallow. It is wrong and repulsive to call a great man, Elon Musk, an anti Semite. It cheapens the label of anti Semitism. It is not good for anybody. Okay, My Patriot Supply. I want to tell you guys about My Patriot Supply. It is an amazing service that you guys can have. In fact, they will bring your emergency preparedness food to you. Go to mypatriotsupply.com. That is mypatriotsupply.com. You are nine meals away from anarchy. Go to mypatriotsupply.com, to make sure that you have the emergency preparedness food for what might be coming next. I know it feels like things are falling apart. Make sure you are prepared for your family right now. Mypatriotsupply.com. That is mypatriotsupply.com. Email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com. Yesterday was one of the livelier days in the history of the Internet. We're just getting started. Stay right there. Noble Gold Investments is pleased to let you know that gold was the best investment class for 02/2022. Through all our record breaking inflation, crashing stock market, the crypto scams, there is one asset that has held its own, gold. According to longtermtrends.net, gold has actually outperformed the S and P 500, Dow, and Bitcoin for 02/2022. Had you invested in the S and P five hundred a year ago, you would be down more than 20%. If you invested in Bitcoin a year ago, you'd be down more than 65%. If you invested in the Dow a year ago, you'd be down almost 10%. Yes. Gold has outperformed them all in 02/2022, and silver is not far behind. Yes. While the world was busy hailing other assets as the real hedge, gold and silver are the only assets that would have protected your wealth. So join the thousands of others by opening a gold IRA or silver IRA with Noble Gold Investments. Get in right now, and you'll bag a free one fourth of an ounce American Gold Eagle coin with every qualified IRA of $50,000 or more. You can't go wrong with Noble Gold Investments and their thousands of five star reviews. Call Noble Gold at (877) 646-5347 to add real gold to your IRA. That's (877) 646-5347. We frequently get asked the question, who's in charge? Who is calling the shots? So it's clear it's not Joe Biden. There's somebody else that is in charge. Well, our next guest is Seamus Brunner, who has a new book out that is very interesting. Exposing the Billionaire Class, Their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life. Sounds uplifting. Seamus, welcome to the program. Speaker 10: Hey, Charlie. It's great to be with you. Speaker 1: Tell us about your book. Speaker 10: Yeah. So I hear it all the time that the pandemic is over. The pandemic is in the path. That's not true. The pandemic was a blueprint for the future and you see it all the time. Our world is getting smaller. It's getting more and more controlled. We're losing control over our children's education, over everything from our food sources to our finances. And so this really lays out the people who are pushing this agenda. Speaker 1: Well, walk us through some of the specifics and the details that that are in the book, and, you know, we can go from there. Speaker 10: Sure. So we follow the money. We follow it all the way to the top at the Government Accountability Institute. We followed it to Davos. I know you've done some great work on this stuff. Let's see. Like, Bill Gates and the the food scheme he's got going. Everybody knows that Bill Gates is buying up all this farmland in The US. They know he's investing in creepy fake food companies, but they're you know, they're not really sure why. And so a lot of it is about money. We we follow the patents. Bill Gates, I mean, as a software salesman, he knows all about licensing and all about intellectual property. His father was an intellectual property attorney. He really helped Microsoft get off the ground. Well, he has used that intellectual property knowledge to start cornering the markets in industries like food. So for example, he buys into Beyond Meats and Impossible Foods only after they have received their patents. And that's kind of the whole thing with these fake foods. It's they say it's about climate change and solve you know, solving climate change, saving the planet. What it's really about is patenting our food sources. They patented the seeds. They've patented the fertilizers, and now they're patenting the meats. Speaker 1: Yeah. So, I mean, the more sinister explanation is that Bill Gates might wanna have less less people. What what what is the or what is the reason you would say that Bill Gates wants to control our food supply? Speaker 10: Well, that's absolutely true, and it sounds like a conspiracy theory. I thought it was too. And you see these clips every now and then of Bill Gates saying there needs to be less people. But that's what all of the characters in this book actually believe. They think that the Earth is vastly overpopulated, and population needs to go down. They don't ever really give you specifics on how they plan to bring the population down. Okay, Speaker 1: everybody. Welcome back. I mean the essence is this: Why do Jews continue to support institutions that hate them? Let's just make it as plain as possible, right? The the part of the tweet though that I want to isolate that I don't like is the kind of bitterness here. Quote, this person said that Elon responded to, I'm deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest crap now about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. This is where I disagree. I support own awakening. I think it's awesome that anybody wakes up regardless of if they did something prior in the past. I don't like that kind of bitterness and that kind of cynicism, to be honest. This person says I'm deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest crap about Western Jewish populations. I see it completely different. I think I think it's exciting and hopeful that Jewish Americans are starting to divest dollars from university campuses. I think that it's exciting when any population starts to reconsider their prior views. So kind of break out of the bitterness. Yes, of course, it's true that traditionally Jews have been funding in America institutions that hate them. And that's too bad. That's tragic. But there's the fact that they're discontinuing that, that they're speaking out against it, that gives me hope. So actually, I do have concern for that. So I I don't know if Elon was responding to that part of it. I think it was probably the first part. If I had to summarize again, I don't know. I can't read Elon's mind. He's gonna have to defend himself. He has sent out subsequent tweets mainly focused on the ADL saying why does the ADL turn a blind eye to anti white, anti Asian hatred while we import the third world that hates Jews and hates everybody? So he's clarified that. So to his credit, it's pretty clear. But this is very important. And we're starting to see some legitimate hope and movement in this direction, which I think is it was very exciting, which is that this announcement yesterday, AIPAC, the American Israeli Political Action Committee, has announced that they are going to spend $100,000,000 to defeat the squad. They're gonna spend a $100,000,000 to in Democrat primaries to go after AOC, Ilan Omar, Jamal Bowman, Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, and there's two other black women. I don't know who they are. I think it might be Fox is the other one. I I I don't know. The squad has grown. Okay. They've multiplied in number. And AIPAC, the American Israeli political action committee is saying, we wanna get rid of the members of the squad. Now, of course, that's not the best use of their money. Their best use of their money is support Donald Trump, is an amazing friend of Israel, who fought against all this poison, but this is a better use of money than the traditional investments that we've seen from sending money to Harvard, sending money to Yale, sending money to the ADL, sending money to BLM. This is way better than APAC spending $100,000,000 to try to defeat Marjorie Taylor Greene or Lauren Boebert. This is now $100,000,000 that they're spending where AOC is gonna have to defend her turf. Elon Omar is gonna have to defend her turf. So to respond to this now viral tweet that Elon responded to, this person says I'm disinterested in giving the tiniest crap about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization. Wrong. We wanna win, and you should not say, hey, you're not welcome into the club because you made mistakes prior. I don't wanna be part of that political movement. I think that is callous, that is elitist, that smug. People should always be welcome to admit errors. Always. I think that's a bad attitude across the board. I held some really stupid political positions five years ago. Some people say, you're still not allowed in the club, Charlie, because you said something stupid five years ago. So there's no growth allowed. There's no forgiveness. There's no humility. Honestly, that's an anti Western value. It's an anti Christian value to say that what you said five years ago will always be hung around your neck and you'll never be allowed to grow, to develop, to clarify, to educate yourself. And I think it's actually exciting and showing that AIPAC, which does tilt Democrat, just so we're clear, most of the membership of AIPAC are Democrats. They are investing their resources to try and make it harder for Marxists to win. Is that the best use of their money? No. It is a far better use of money than what we have seen the last twenty or thirty years. It is a positive move in the right direction. So anyway, that's Elon Musk's response. Elon will have to defend himself. Elon is not an anti Semite. What Elon was probably isolating here, as he has clarified in subsequent tweets, is that hey, Jewish populations have been financing a lot of this stuff. It's good that they are waking up. I think it's positive. I think it's exciting, and it gives me hope. More after the break. Email is freedom@CharlieKirk.com. Speaker 11: Do you Speaker 1: know that the average American spends about twenty years in retirement? That's a long time to live without a steady income. And we wanna make sure you enjoy every moment of it and don't outlive your money. Retirement is about more than just investments. It's about living your best life. Let's not retire. Let's pivot. My friends at Pax Financial, who I use for my wealth management future, develop a course for the sole purpose of helping you pivot. If you want your own free guide to pivoting into the new chapter of life with purpose, visit packsfg.com/charlie. I don't think they're investing their money into the new modern day equivalents of hospitals or public parks. Rockefeller, for example, donated millions of acres in Maine and Wyoming, which we now know as the gateway to Yellowstone Park. They literally named the entire highway after it. You know, Carnegie built, you know, not just Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon, but also huge amounts of public infrastructure projects. Talk about how this is a different elite. This is a different mindset. This is a separate psychology than we've seen of the elites a century ago. Speaker 10: That's exactly right, Charlie. The the, you know, the oligarchs so called oligarchs of the early twentieth century are nothing like what we're seeing today. What we see today with the big tech oligarchs is, like, it's got complexes on steroids. They want to control every aspect of your life from what you're eating to what you're seeing. I mean, information, of course, you you know, you talk about it all the time with the censorship and the clampdowns on descent. And as far as loving America, no. These are these are avowed globalists. They're loyal to the World Economic Forum, and Davos just they, you know, they call themselves citizens of the world. That's, know, the abolition of borders and Soros funding all of these migrant groups moving people into The US. He wants to do away with borders. And so, yeah, there's there's a you know, I they don't state that they're not loyal to The United States, but their actions and especially their funding show that they have other loyalties. Speaker 1: Yeah. The this kind of, other loyalties is important, and the god complex is bad. What's even worse than the god complex is wanting to use your kind of wealth and your power to remake the country, not to shore up its defenses. I mean, Henry Ford certainly had some issues. Right? But he poured into the country. He wanted a very strong country. And so where does this come from? Why is it that the new roster of the elites that you detail in your book, Controllogarchs, why do they hate the homeland so much? Where does this come from? Is it because they went to university? I mean, Bill Gates was a dropout. Is it because they were raised in a Silicon Valley finance culture that is more globalist minded? Where does it come from? Speaker 10: Well, let's see. Yes. That's exactly right. I mean, it's the globalist mindset. It's and it's not so it's not necessarily just America. It's more the peasant class. I mean, they have more in common with the elites of China, for example. I go, you know, into great detail about how they really love China, and they love the Chinese system. They love this amalgamation of capitalism and communism. State run capitalism is what they call it in China. Claus Schwab calls it stakeholder capitalism, which I know you've talked about, and it's sort of this esoteric term. But stakeholder capitalism, when you read Claus Schwab's manifestos, the people who don't aren't the stakeholders. He never talks about the people. We the people being stakeholders. It's always business leaders and NGOs and officials from, you know, the government. We don't have a seat at that table. Speaker 1: Yeah. So to kinda build that out further, though, which is there's the World Economic Forum. You have Klaus Schwab on the front page of your book. Everyone is driven by something different. I I I don't know if you agree with this. Do you think that Soros has a different agenda than Zuckerberg? I do. Zuckerberg seems like a guy who wants to end the game with the most tokens. Soros is a guy that wants to destroy the game. Would you agree with that? Speaker 10: Yeah. But they they I do I do agree with that. I mean, they're all they're all have different motivations to a degree, but they also have a lot of the same motivations in that they want to control, you know, every facet of life. I, you know, see it time and again both with Soros and with Zuckerberg. So, yes, they're they have different opinions. They're different people. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I I just I I think that Soros is far more sinister and kinda say Machiavellian. Zuckerberg, I think, is malleable. I mean, based on all public accounts, people that have known Zuckerberg, he's used to be kind of this free speech liberal, almost libertarian, but I think he's a coward. I think that external forces have been able to shape shift Zuckerberg. I think he wants to be liked. I think he wants to have his empire. He wants to be reasonable. Soros is a legit ideologue. We we have no evidence that Zuckerberg in his private musings is all about, you know, western transformation. Right? Now he might be doing that, but as far as his intention, I'm not so sure. Speaker 6: Charlie Kirk Speaker 1: Okay, everybody. Hillsdale College. I'm wearing my Hillsdale tie today. With America's college and universities so morally corrupt, they're less concerned with critical thinking than with indoctrination. I'm happy to report there is a college where students debate ideas openly and honestly. It's my favorite college, Hillsdale College. You can learn more at charlieforhillsdale.com. As stated in Hillsdale's founding document in 1844, Hillsdale's original mission was to offer the serious kind of liberal arts education needed to preserve the blessings of civil and religious liberty across the land. Look, if you go to charlieforhillsdale.com, you'll find a short video. It's over a minute long showing how Hillsdale's work, not only on its Michigan and Washington DC campuses, but across the nation is effective in defending American liberty. Their online courses are excellent. You've got to check it out right now. Go to charlie4hillsdale.com. That is charlief0rhillsdale.com. As stated in the Hillsdale online documents, you've got to check it out. Charlie for hillsdale dot com. You could take the Victor Davis Hanson American citizenship class, the American history class, of course, on Aristotle, Winston Churchill, mathematics, Euclidean geometry, Genesis, Exodus. Do you want to learn? Charlieforhillsdale.com is the place to start. They do a wonderful job, and they are America's greatest college by far. So check it out. Charlieforhillsdale.com. Okay. So some of you might say, but Charlie, is there really a war on white people? Yeah. Let's put aside all of the obvious anti white violence we've seen in high schools, the white kid getting killed. You know, let's put all that aside, which which is clear. Let's put aside the University of Chicago course, the course at Yale, all that stuff. This is an amazing example of what we're talking about. Now, to be very accurate, you can't say that, you know, liberal Jews are funding this. Okay? What we're getting at, though, is that this example is one of hundreds of thousands that should really make you think deeply about what is happening in American education. It is fashionable. It is popular. It is in vogue to hate white people. I'm going to prove it to you. There's a new series of videos over the last couple of weeks that I've seen of students that record on Zoom high school debate competitions. Now, to be clear, high school debate is not what it used to be. It doesn't teach rhetoric. It doesn't teach persuasion. It doesn't teach public speaking. It doesn't encourage an authentic understanding of a topic. High school debate has become spewing of left wing talking points and they become winners. Now, recent weeks, high school students in debate again have been recording these debates on Zoom and have been putting them on the Internet to say, hey, look what passes as debate now. Look what passes as a popular argument or a what's considered to be a winning argument. So, oh, is this a guy that does this incubate debate James Fishback? I I guess he's the one that's tweeting this stuff out. It's very interesting. I I I wasn't aware of that. So I want you to listen very carefully. This here is a high school debate team that won the debate. I want you to count how many times they say the word white. This is what is considered to be a good argument. They ignored the prompt and resorted to shamelessly attacking white people, not once, not twice, but with zero depth whatsoever, blaming white people for all the problems. Listen carefully. This is what is considered to be a winning debate team in America today. Play cut one thirteen and listen carefully. Speaker 12: We demand that white Christians be held accountable for America's original sin. The negative continues the trend in politics while whiteness devours the other. Debating this topic is irrelevant while society is dominated by white Christians. Even if we have something educational to say about this topic, the political will just pray it away and continue their mission to conquer the world in the name of Jesus Christ. The military industrial complex has been coupled with American Christianity, the worship of the weapons of whiteness. United States was built to be a city upon a hill for white Christians. American Christianity has controlled all aspects of politics such as justifying slavery. We solved by decoupling weapons and worships and ending the crusade. White Christians literally inscribe scriptures onto their weapons, worshiping through war. We want to repent for our sins and show America's failure. By voting for us, the judge will send his signal to political leaders and condemn Christian in politics. Speaker 13: That ends up being a two one for Livingston. The affirmative tells me in summary and final focus that the role of the ballot for me is to reject Christian militarism. So at the end of the day, I'm left with deciding which side I think is better doing a better job rejecting Christian militarism. Speaker 1: That is considered to be a winning debate. They ignored the prompt and they just said, yeah, it's all about Christian militant militarism and white Christianity. That's considered to be deep. And they won. They won the debate. Where does that come from exactly? It goes down the tributary. It starts at Harvard. It starts at Yale. It starts at Dartmouth. And then it goes down. They create the teaching standards. They create the curriculum. And what many Jews are texting me to their great credit, They're saying, oh my gosh. High school debate will soon say this. They'll soon read a prompt. And it's the Jews' fault. They're an inch away from saying that. This close. And what Candace was saying and what Tucker was saying and what Elon is saying is that that clip I just played until recently did not bother most liberal Jews. And that's frustrating. Now it does bother a lot of liberal Jewish donors. Dots are starting to be connected. They're like, Oh, wait. All the toxicity and venom and hatred that we turned a blind eye to or we might have been cool with against white people is now being directed to us. So in that high school debate clip, you saw these kids reading a prompt, right? Reading a prompt, and they say, you know, white people are to blame for this. It doesn't take a massive leap to turn that high school debate kid to plug and replace, to copy paste white people out, Jewish in. That's where this comes from, guys. We've said this for the last couple weeks. Why is it that so many young people are on board for the Palestinian liberation thing or Gaza? Why are so many young people praising Osama bin Laden right now? It's a big thing right now on TikTok. Huge. Osama bin Laden is being praised by Generation Z because you've taught them to hate America, to hate white people, and then eventually hate Jews. And Hamas sympathizers are literally BLM two point o. You guys remember this. Here's cut one fourteen. White people begging for forgiveness from black people. This is during Floyd a Palooza. Play cut one fourteen. Okay. That's some sick stuff. Speaker 7: By the Speaker 1: way, it's sick on two sides. It's sick for the white people doing it and sick for the black people that are allowing it to happen. Like, some black guys should be like, this is insane. Get up. Enough. We're gonna take responsibility for our own problems. Get off your knees. Stop asking are you a you should have been are you KKK? Are you racist? Then stop apologizing. Enough. Stop pandering to us. You got that black woman crying. Oh my gosh. I've been waiting for this my whole life. I can get a job. Give me a break. The white hate gets turned into white guilt in the heads of weak minded people who then fall for the rhetoric. So where what does all this tie together, everybody? You are living through without a doubt one of the most heated, consequential, high stakes realignments in the history of the digital narrative war. I know that some of you might not see it, you might not be looking at it. If you are not actively on social media, you might not be watching it. I'm telling you, you are living through a TikTok, Twitter, Instagram. I have never seen sea changes like this ever. And we are flirting with some really dangerous stuff. Very dangerous stuff. There's some exciting stuff happen of people waking up and enlightenments and awakening and the rising of the frequencies. Producer Andrew said this morning, I have never seen so many people wake up so quickly. That is true. Simultaneously, I have not seen so much garbage, venom, crap spread so quickly in the history of the digital narrative war. Remember, Twitter is the incubator of elite opinion, but TikTok is the incubator of idiocy for generation Z. Let me say that again. Twitter is the incubator for elite thought. TikTok is the incubator of idiocy for Generation Z. They might say, but Charlie, let's compete on TikTok. We try. We have our, you know, I resisted as long as I could. They censor us. They ban us. They suppress us. TikTok, which is a Chinese Communist Party asset funded by the Chinese Communist Party, they elevate content that weakens America, weakens Western society. They will give priority to trans content. They give priority to gay content. They give priority to left wing politics, and they deemphasize pages that would talk about masculinity, borders, free speech, or conservative values. Chinese TikTok is all about solving math problems and games and being healthy and having big families. American TikTok is about cutting off your genitals, taking Lupron, and supporting Hamas. So what I'm getting at here, the macro, because some of you might say, but Charlie, how do all these different dots connect? You are living through right now one of the greatest changes of how people view the world in my life by far in my lifetime. I've not seen anything like it. COVID was close, but the difference with COVID is that almost all the means of communication were suppressed. We couldn't speak openly on Twitter during COVID. We kept on losing access to our Twitter account. We now have Twitter, so the truth can get out. We're like, wow. Could you if we had axe this is a this is the truth. If we had access to Twitter and Elon owned Twitter during COVID, I think hundreds of thousands of lives would have been saved. We got suppressed on ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, monoclonal antibodies. Imagine how many lives could have been saved if we had Twitter during COVID. It's a big deal. At the same time, we for every action there's equal and opposite reaction, we have Twitter and then we have TikTok, which is just this Wuhan laboratory of anti West hatred that Gen Z is just getting. It's pumping in. By the way, I've been completely unsuccessful. I tell parents, why do you give yourself your kids phones? Honestly, because parents don't want a parent anymore. That's why. They give their kid a digital pacifier so they can go back to wine and their kid can just stare at the screen all day long. Like, I don't know why my kid is depressed. Yeah. Go look at your kid's screen time. Okay? Eight and a half hours staring at TikTok. Yeah. I mean, don't be surprised when their suicidal ideation goes up. It's just so weird. Why do some of these kids depressed and anxious? Because they're staring at their screen all day long. Go be a parent. Go stare at a tree. Go fish. Go for a run. There's a life outside of watching a bunch of trannies dancing in favor of Hamas. Relieffactor.com. A 100% drug free relief factor. Knee pain, back pain, joint pain, elbow pain. Check it out right now at relieffactor.com. The 100% drug free Relief Factor could be the best solution for you. Leah was sitting on her couch in so much pain. She was literally in tears. You've got to check it out. She says, I'm so I'm truly amazed at this product. If you're living with aches and pains, see how Relief Factor, a daily drug free supplement could help you feel better and live longer. You're gonna get started. Try this Relief Factor three week quick start. It's only $19.95 and comes with feel better, your money back guarantee. Visit relieffactor.com. That's relieffactor.com. $1,800 for relief. That's $1,800 for relief. They're amazing. So check it out right now. Relieffactor.com. So please check it out right now. Relieffactor.com. One Sunday, Leah was sitting on her couch. She was in pain and got out of pain. Relieffactor.com. $1,800 for relief. Feel better and money back guarantee only $19.95. That is relieffactor.com relieffactor.com. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. You are living through a digital realignment, a narrative war that is changing in real time. It's exciting and also scary simultaneously. We'll be right back. Because colleges and universities today are less concerned with critical thinking than with indoctrination. It is no wonder why so many young Americans embrace cancel culture, deny free speech to conservatives, and even celebrate terrorism. There is one college where students debate ideas openly and honestly, where they pursue truth together with their professors, and where America's great heritage of liberty is studied and revered. My favorite college, Hillsdale College. As stated in Hillsdale's founding document in 1844, Hillsdale's original mission was to offer the kind of serious liberal arts education needed to preserve the blessings of civil and religious liberty across the land, and this mission continues to guide Hillsdale College today. You can learn more at my favorite college's website, charlieforhillsdale.com. There, you will find a short video. It's just over a minute long showing how Hillsdale's work, not only on its Michigan campus, not only in Washington DC campus, but across the nation is effective in defending American liberty. Take some time to watch today at charlieforhillsdale.com. You are you're kind of super well built and trimmed. I think that's a good use of money. What's not a good use of money is his taxpayer funded electric vehicle ambitions. Tell us about it. Speaker 10: Yeah. That's right. And just going back to what you were saying a moment ago about Zuckerberg versus Doros, I think Bezos is a lot closer to Zuckerberg. Like you say, I mean, he had this sort of almost libertarian bent in the nineties, and it's sort turned into more I mean, he's very quiet. You don't hear much from him except when you see him doing these photoshoots. But it's yeah. But the with the electric vehicle, I mean, everyone knows about Amazon and Alexa. They're always listening to you. But what most people don't know is that they're actually trying to figure out what you're thinking. And and Amazon Web Services is, you know, a huge AI Speaker 6: Where tyranny dies and wisdom lives. The Charlie Kirk Show. Speaker 1: Somebody asked me the other day, how are you able to keep going on with this? Preserving liberty means more to me than anything else. You see, we're in a very important time in our nation's history. You look around in this room. Don't give me this nonsense that Americans are giving up. That is not true. Amfest.com. Amfest.com. Check it out. Phoenix, Arizona. It's gonna be the largest event we've ever held, god willing. Wait till you see the speakers we're announcing tomorrow. So get your tickets today while they're still there. Amfest.com. K. Welcome back. I I wanna just keep on encouraging APAC. I'm glad that they're deploying those resources in that way. It's not the best, but it's better, and that deserves encouragement and praise. God bless them. Candace Owens mentioned this, and we have Candace Owens coming up next hour. By the way, Candace was trending on Twitter all over the place, and people were so unfair to Candace Owens. I have her back a 100%. People say, oh, she's an anti Semite. I said, really? Candace Owens who dropped everything. I was in Jerusalem. It's a true story. I called Candace. I said, Candace, we have an extra ticket if you want it to go to the embassy opening when Trump moves the embassy. And she says, oh my goodness. She drops everything, eighteen hour flight, brutal connection through Europe, two red eye flights to get all the way to Israel for the embassy opening with Donald Trump. We saw where Jesus healed the sick. We went to the city of David. We saw the old city, and she loved it. So it's just these people, it's just so shallow, so sloppy. I don't like it at all. We'll talk more about that next hour. But Candace said this and she's and this is a vibe that is out there. And I don't think some of the pro Israel pro Israel advocates are listening when we say this. I'm gonna I'm gonna I'm in a separate category. I I have some bitterness that I've expressed on the show, which is the way that I've been talked about and treated has really bothers me, to be honest, because of how much prohazard advocacy I've done and do, but I'm a put put me aside. Okay? There is a Jonathan Greenblatt who runs the ADL. The ADL is an awful organization. He goes on television and he's saying this quote, Administrators are going to find their backbone if we hold them accountable. This is about the anti Jew hatred on campus. And by the way, he's correct in saying this to be perfectly fair. Donors need to hold them accountable. Students need to hold them accountable. Then he says the federal government needs to have them accountable. I don't really know what that means. Okay? But Jonathan Greenblatt, the reason why Candace said what she said on Tucker and the reason why the vibe on the right is off on this is we're like, really? Where were all of you guys the last couple of years? I thought hatred to one group is hatred to everybody. That's literally in the ADL ad. In the ADL ad is that all hate oh, I guess all hate is bad unless it's hatred of Asians and hatred of whites. Play cut 56. Speaker 14: The question I was gonna ask you, which we have now seen at least the beginning of some pushback finally from people who run these schools. You mentioned Columbia, other places. Do you see the leadership at some of these schools that you've been pushing so hard? Are they now finding the backbone you just described? Speaker 15: Well well, they're only gonna find the backbone if we hold them accountable. Donors need to hold them accountable. Students need to hold them accountable, and the federal government does too. And let me tell you, the university presidents, they might not listen to some students, but when they run the risk of losing hundreds of millions of dollars in federal grants, they're going to respond. Speaker 1: So there's a ADL is comprised of left wing, sometimes secular Jews. There's a major upheaval that's probably going to happen in the ADL sometime soon. Now why is it that the ADL receives such focus from Elon Musk and from us? It's not just that they're liberal. It's that the ADL goes out of their way to try and debank you. The ADL goes out of their way to try to pull advertisers from your show or from Twitter. The ADL, as he says accountability by the way, I think you should finally do that. By the way, if the ADL finally waves the sword towards colleges, I will be an enthusiastic supporter, but I don't buy it. If the ADL will be nearly as harsh to Harvard as they have been to Elon, God bless them. But they won't. They're gonna treat Harvard and Princeton and Yale with kid gloves, Cause the ADL are first liberals and then they're Jews. That's and you know who said that? Dennis Prager. So don't call me an anti Semite. Their liberalism is more important than their Judaism. It's always been that way. And they've been captured by a lot of secular Jews. So the question is, will the ADL be as ferocious, intense, nasty to Princeton, Yale, Dartmouth and Stanford as they have been to Twitter, to Jack Posobic, to Bannon? Probably not. You know, Greenblatt says, yeah, you know, we need some accountability. Really? Greenblatt, why don't you we know the answer because liberalism is very important to him, and Harvard is the holy cathedral of American left wing liberalism. Okay? Harvard is the Vatican of American leftism. It's just where they it's where the the catechism of the left is published in Harvard. So when he says accountability, why doesn't Harvard say, we're gonna defund you. We're gonna burn you to the ground because he doesn't he doesn't mean it. Okay. More coming up next hour. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Did you know that there is one phase of sleep that almost everyone fails to get enough of? And this one phase of sleep is responsible for most of your body's daily rejuvenation, repair, controlling hunger and weight loss hormones, boosting energy, and so much more. I'm talking about deep sleep. And if you don't get enough, you'll probably struggle with cravings, slow metabolism, premature aging, or even worse conditions. Why don't most people get enough of this one most important phase of sleep? A big reason is magnesium deficiency because over eighty percent of the population is deficient in magnesium. And magnesium increases GABA, which encourages relaxation on a cellular level, which is critical for sleep. Magnesium also plays a key role in regulating your body's stress response system. Those with magnesium deficiency usually have higher stress levels, which negatively impact sleep as well. Now before you go out, buy a magnesium supplement. It's important to understand that most products out there only have one or two forms of magnesium when the reality is your body needs all seven forms of this natural sleep mineral. That's why I Magnesium breakthrough contains all seven forms of magnesium designed to help calm your mind and you fall asleep, stay asleep, and wake up refreshed. The deep sleep benefits are really noticeable. Visit magnesiumbreakthrough.com/charlie and enter code Charlie 10 for 10% off any order. The special offer is only available at magnesiumbreakthrough.com/charlie. Speaker 10: Cloud contract type deal from the Pentagon. All of the big tech agencies are hosting their operations on Amazon Web Services. That's kind of a thing that goes really unnoticed. I mean, you see when you're watching an NFL game that Amazon's got the great stats, and I do enjoy seeing those stats that are you know, from AI that they're giving you. But think about all of that technology. They boast of it in the commercials being used against you. I mean, it's a pretty terrifying prospect. So I would say that Bezos amongst the people on the cover I mean, you're certainly right. George Soros is a total ideologue and and, you know, more terrifying in a lot of ways than what he's trying to fund with the chaos and the total destruction of The United States. You don't see Bezos totally funding that, but he's funding the climate change ambition, the so called climate change ambitions that are really all about control from the vehicles to the smart homes. I mean, there's some examples in the book of smart thermostats. If you got a smart thermostat, just imagine going home in the middle of the summer, going to bed and waking up drenched in sweat because the utility companies have decided they're gonna use your smart thermostat to keep the temperature high in the middle of the summer. It's happened in Texas. It happened in Colorado. You see Gavin Newsom in California telling people that their, you know, their temperatures of their homes need to stay up at 80 degrees when it's in a heat wave. I mean, it's just crazy. And Jeff Bezos is making the tech that allows you to do that. Speaker 1: The book is Controllogarcs. We will be right back after the break. Seamus Seamus, stay right there. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. We'll be right back. The book is Controllogarcs. Seamus Brunner continues with us. So, Seamus, let me ask you about this one, weaponizing artificial intelligence. Controllogarchs are rapidly ratcheting up AI to extinguish what remains of a free market and push Americans into Marxism. This is a very deep topic. I've always been I'm I'm worried currently that AI is going to be used as a tool to create a tyrannical society even worse than what we have. Your thoughts? Speaker 10: You're exactly right to be worried, and it's happening right now. The intelligence agencies, they're using AI. They're gonna use the tech companies to do it. You look at the biggest company, ChatGPT. I mean, regarding the of all you know, getting rid of the free market. Look at the largest company behind ChatGPT, OpenAI. There's a reason that OpenAI is funding universal basic income studies. And it's I mean, they you know, there's other experts, World Economic Forum experts who say that AI is going to eliminate 40% of the jobs. Either you're gonna have to adapt or you're gonna be out of work. And, you know, I think the ultimate goal here, they sort of state it when they say you will own nothing and be happy in Davos, is sort of a peasant class living in high rise buildings and ultra low emission zones with no cars eating the bugs, and that's what AI is going to allow. Speaker 1: In your research, how then do we best counter the the looming AI threat from these contrologarchs? Speaker 10: Well, the first step is you gotta be aware of this, and you gotta be aware of their blueprint. I mean, sunlight is the best disinfectant. Something that gives me hope in all of this is that keep more and more people are craving authenticity. As you see these AI thing, I mean, it's really cool that some of the videos you'll see online of what people are able to do with AI and making videos that look super real, but aren't. But then you see you can get down into the comment sections, and you see more and more people saying this is gross. This is creepy. It's the same thing with the fake foods. Something that gives me hope is, you know, they're not extremely popular, which is why they have to ban cows, and Ireland is headed towards slaughtering the cows. So as more more people become aware of what's going on, spread the word, shine the disinfecting light of sunlight on these agendas, that does give me hope. And, you know, nobody's gonna wanna live in a pod eating bugs. The question is once you're out of work and given a meager basic income of $30,000, are you going to be able to do anything about it? And that's why we need to act right now. Speaker 1: So your book Controllogarcs, set quote, rips back the curtain on never before published revelations. What are some of the craziest and most important revelations that our audience would not have heard before? Speaker 10: Well, I just published a piece on Breitbart today. It it might be the way he's lead story still, and this is about the the control guards profiting from abortion. I mean, right now, the supreme court is weighing whether or not to invalidate the FDA approval of a drug called mifepristone. It's also known as r u four eight six. And this is I mean, this thing is really a a sickening drug, and it shocked me when I found out that it's the most common method of abortion. Now you don't have to be pro life to find it sort of grotesque that people like George Soros and Warren Buffett are profiting and and setting up secret shell companies in the Cayman Islands in order to receive profits from chemical induced abortions. So that that drug, Texas was the great state of Texas was the one to sue the FDA last November saying that the Clinton era approval of this drug was totally crooked. And in the book, I actually document how just how crooked this was. It was the Rockefeller Foundation in partnership with a few other contrologarchs who brought this drug from a German company whose roots were in Nazi Germany. IG Farben's successor entity is called Huxde G. Huckst developed this drug that kills infants en masse or kills the new, I guess, fetuses en masse. And, you know, the you use tax exempt resources. This is what the Rockefeller Foundation does. They use tax exempt resources in partnerships with the government and the Clinton administration to bring this drug to market. Now it turns out that this is actually one of the most painful ways of having an abortion for a woman. And then you've got billionaires profiting from it. So I thought that was pretty pretty grotesque. You know, the a lot of the world economic forum stuff has been talked about. Yuval Noah Harari. I know you've talked about him a lot on the show. But just some of the some of the things that they are pouring billions of dollars into, whether the AI and the Neuralink type companies, microchips, brain microchips, with the test subjects being animals for now. I mean, actually, FDA just approved Neuralink for human trials. I thought this was all conspiracy theory stuff, microchips in brains. It's real. It's happening. Over 10,000 people have received microchips in their brains to ostensibly the the thin edge of the wedge is, to cure paralysis. But, of course, in the hype videos, it's like psychic text messaging and ultimately, like, VR porn, I guess, beamed directly into your brain stem. That kind of was shocking. And, it sounds like conspiracy theory stuff, but just go look at the videos on their websites. I mean, this is what they're trying to bring about. I mean, the founder of the Oculus Rift, is trying to make nerve implants to make VR porn more realistic. Zuckerberg has got patents, and patents is a huge theme in the book. I mean, that's what it's all about is patents equal profit. Zuckerberg's patenting things like Nu Skin and haptic suits so that when you're living in a virtual world, can you know, it's like Ready Player One type stuff. So it used to be dystopian future science fiction. It's all here. It's all now, and it's pretty shocking stuff. Speaker 1: So to reemphasize the abortion pill. Welcome back, everybody. Email us freedom@freedomcharleykirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Joining us now is one of my favorite guests, Heather McDonald. Heather, welcome back to the program. I want everyone to check out When Race Trumps Merit. So Heather, there's been several stories. Haley Biden carjacked in DC, eight teenagers charged with murder in Las Vegas of a young white man, San Francisco that's cleaning up all the streets for Xi, which is a separate issue in some way, but we see we see all these different stories and we're getting more and more emails. Do you think that white America is starting to wake up, that there is a multidimensional, multi institutional war against white people in this country? Speaker 16: Well, we haven't figured out a language yet to really talk about it, Charlie, that will be acceptable to even many conservative ears. But I certainly hear that from students. I was at the University of Virginia last week, and a young student that I was speaking with said that there is a growing awareness among young people, especially for white males, that they are absolutely pariahs in our society. They are going to be the last admitted to schools, excuse me, the last fired, the first fired. And so it is a reality, and it is a reality that is absolutely denied by the entirety of of our mainstream society and by many conservatives. But we need to keep pointing this out because there is no grounds whatsoever for European the inheritors of European civilization to cancel it. Now those inheritors may be people of all different colors, but the the people that are under attack are the Caucasian inheritors of that civilization. And at this point in world history, we have nothing to apologize for because any violations of human rights, and human rights is, of course, exclusively a European Western concept, violations of those rights, whether it's American slavery or imperial atrocities, pale in comparison to every other civilization's ongoing atrocities and violence. Speaker 1: So Heather, I mean, another example, at Louisiana Tech, a black student stabbing for white women is just another story that has happened. I do think that there is a greater and greater understanding and agreement that the laws, the enforcement laws, the lack of media coverage, it's almost fashionable to hate white people. Now, I guess the next question is, Heather, what next? Would it be helpful for, you know, white people or white America to recognize and realize this and talk about this more? Because anytime we notice it, it's the amazing phrase from Michael Anton. It's not happening, but it's good that it is. Like, we're not allowed to even notice it. Your thoughts, Heather McDonald. Speaker 16: It's not just fashionable to hate white people. It's presidential. You know, we have a president now who goes around at every opportunity, staying the preposterous lie that white supremacy is the biggest threat in this country. And and let's just let's just get the facts out there, Charlie, yet again because this is so completely denied by the media that amplifies the Biden message of white supremacy. If you look at all interracial violence between blacks and whites and whites and blacks, blacks commit 87% of all interracial attacks between blacks and whites and whites and blacks. A black is 35 times more likely to commit an act of violence against a white person than vice versa. And we see it, you know, the the few times when you get the videos and you get either the names that reveal that it's a black perpetrator because of the pseudo Africanist names. We see this happening, and yet we're in an absolute state of denial. So what it's gonna take, what sort of politician or leader to articulate that reality, it it remains a a very, very touchy thing. I mean, I can feel it when I go on, you know, what is, for us, the mainstream media, which is Fox News. If you use white in any other context than one of opprobrium, you really are asking to be called a racist by fellow conservatives. And that is preposterous because to say that whites are under attack is not to attack blacks per se. It is to notice the facts, the averages. Of course, there are millions of blacks who are law abiding, who don't want to be treated as perpetual victims and wards of the state. But on average, there is a pathological inner city culture that is creating dysfunction. You have now what's going on, a race hustle on the part of too many Black leaders where they can simply play upon white guilt and claim that it is an accomplishment in itself to be Black. You have the possibility now of specializing in being black just as I could specialize in being female, or gays can specialize in being gay. And that's the one accomplishment that nobody can compete with you And and and it gives you enormous power over the absolute pariahs of straight white males. Speaker 1: And yet we're told that racism is the biggest problem. What what could actually break the matrix, and I don't know if you agree, Heather, I think that it's probably fifty fifty. I don't think every black believes that racism is the biggest problem. I think some have convinced themselves of that, but I think deep down a lot of great Black Americans, they know that there are other problems. Like you said, the pathologies that are put into their culture, right? What is considered to be acceptable? Not staying with the women that you impregnate, so on and so forth. Instead of telling black Americans that they could be great by doing great noble things, we have this self esteem cult of like black girl magic. You're magical because of whatever. It's toxic. And of course, there are tons of problems in urban America and it continues, to this day. Let's just play this this this tape that just went viral here. Play 71. But of course, racism is the problem. Play cut 71. Speaker 10: On my butter. We do it. Don't play my slide on post play. It will get like that. No. No. No. No. Switches right here. And I picked up That's just enough right there. That's enough. +1, 23. That's enough. Yeah. Speaker 1: It's I don't know if you saw that video, Heather. It's such a mystery why there are so many murders in the inner city. So Heather, go through the numbers because I think what percentage of murders are committed by black men in the country? You know, crime, is it is it proportional to their population? Speaker 16: Oh, no. It's it's vastly disproportional. Blacks commit about 66% of all violent crime in the country, at least in the 75 largest counties, which is where most of the population resides. Though they're 15% of the population in those 75 largest counties, they commit well over half of all murders. It's it's so disproportionate. It's far more disproportionate than their number in the prison population where they're a third of the prison population. In fact, studies have shown that blacks are less likely to be convicted of felonies, whether because prosecutors just aren't coming down as hard or they've got sympathetic juries. But at at a third of the prison population, that's actually much less than you would expect from blacks involvement in violent crime. But that video is absolutely classic, Charlie. We've seen those videos. The police see those videos all the time. You know, we're supposed to believe that that the problem with these black kids is that they're too poor. They don't have any opportunities as the mayor of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, has said to justify the the flash mobs, marauding magnificent mile beating up on white tourists. The fact of the matter is blacks are posting inner city kids post videos like that from their smartphones all the time showing off their showing off their money. The social media is the police's best friend because it helps them solve these gang ties. Any kid that has a smartphone is not economically deprived. That kid is richer in resources than than Louis the fourteenth ever was. But we have Speaker 1: That turned is our such a good point. That is so correct. Yes. That's a great point. Speaker 9: Turn our eyes to see Speaker 16: because we can't look at it any longer. In the nineties, we were talking about rap music. We were talking about the cop hatred, the misogyny, the homophobia. We were disturbed by it. Now we don't even talk about it. We simply blame ourselves and and feel like it is somehow a violation of racial etiquette to mention these pathologies. And there's pathologies in the white underclass as well. Let's be perfectly clear. But this Charlie, it is so urgent for whites to stop caving into the race hustle because whites Speaker 1: Okay. I think we need to fix Heather's connection. I I wish we could have finished that sentence. We'll fix that connection in a second. Ruff Greens and by the way, let's just summarize it. This is this is so simple. Get married, get a job, graduate high school, don't commit crimes. Period. Ruffgreens.com. You've heard me talk about Ruff Greens and how it's helping dogs. You gotta check out dog food is dead food. Ruff Greens has essential vitamins and minerals, omega oils, digestive enzymes, probiotics, and plenty of antioxidants. Get your free jump start trial bag. All you have to do is cover the shipping. Check it out right now. Roughgreens.com/kirk. That is ruffgreens.com/kirk. You don't have to change your dog's food. Just add a small scoop of rough greens every single day. Has omega oils, digestive enzymes, probiotics. It's incredible. If you have a dog, you've got to check out ruffgreens.com/kirk. That is ruffgreens.com/kirk. Ruffgreens.com/kirk. Check it out right now. Ruffgreens.com/kirk. Heather McDonald continues after the break. She's amazing. Check out her book. It's very, very important. When race trumps merit. More after the break. People ask me everywhere I travel about StrongCell. Charlie, is StrongCell legit? Charlie, do you really believe in the antiaging properties of NADH? Charlie, is this product worth the price? My answer is the same to all of their questions. Yes, yes, and yes. I'm a huge believer in this approach to health and wellness. StrongCell is a scientific breakthrough in cellular health replenishment that combines NADH, co q ten, and marine collagen to boost your body's cellular function. I personally take strong cell every day, and so do a ton of our Kirk listeners. Go see the reviews for yourself. If you are someone who relies on caffeine or sugar just to keep yourself going, then you have to give StrongCell a try. I only have one important request of you. I recommend this life changing product, but you have to give it at least four weeks to realize the best results. It takes a little time to reengineer your body's NADH. Think about it. It's been on the decline for quite a while, and in some cases, for decades. First step, go to strongcell.com/charlie today. That's strongsell.com/charlie and read the personal testimonials for yourself. Then use promo code Charlie to get a special 20% discount on your order. Again, that's strongsell.com/charlie, and don't forget your 20% discount by using promo code Charlie at checkout. Covered a lot. Zuckerberg, Bezos not as much. Who remember, he owns the Washington Post and his ex wife, Mackenzie, like you said, she's worth $35,000,000,000 and she's just spending money like it's going out of style on left wing politics. And then you have Soros. Soros out of the five out of the six no. Out of the five. Out of the five is the most notorious to try to reshape western society. What do what have you discovered about George Soros that you feel does not get enough attention? Speaker 10: Well, you know, there's a question of whether the George Soros would even laugh, and should he be on the cover, would he be alive? He's 93 years old. And so I wanted to see who the next Soros is, and that's Alexander Soros. Of course, George Soros has multiple children. Each one of them funds radical left wing causes. And, unfortunately, his $25,000,000,000 empire is passed in the hands of Alexander Soros, who is much more radical than he is, his father that is his father. Alex Alex Soros has said he wants to use this $25,000,000,000 empire to fund abortion. And, I mean, it obviously calls it women's rights and reproductive health. They all use sort of these euphemisms for the mass extermination of fetuses. But so and and, of course, elections are you know, if Alex Soros lives to the age of his father, our elections are not safe for the next fifty years. Speaker 1: Yeah. The the entire Soros cabal and cartel Soros cabal and cartel is gonna have billions and billions and billions of dollars. Alexander Source, by the way, is more political than the other. I love this clip here. So here you have Bill Gates who wants to be in charge of your childhood vaccinations, food, and health. Play cut 60. Speaker 17: Out there distributing health advice that have a giant hole in their health game. Speaker 11: Yeah. Absolutely. Speaker 17: Like, Bill Gates is a great example of that. He's got this big fat belly, and he's telling people they have to get vaccinated. Like, this kind of binary thinking, this kind of ridiculous way of looking at the world through only pharmacological interventions, through only medicine, through only this, through only that. There's so many different things that you have to do to be healthy. Speaker 1: Yeah. The the the best part of the tape is actually when Rogan just roasts him for for other, physical attributes. Check out the book Controllogarcs. Seamus will continue, after the breakup. Seamus Brunner continues with us. So, Seamus, what piece of research are here in the book that we didn't talk about? Do you wanna make sure our audience is aware of? Just plug your book, Controllogarcs. Speaker 10: I think my favorite chapter was the dystopian present chapter, and that's the one that's all about Speaker 1: Welcome back, everybody. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Make sure you get involved with Turning Point USA. We're getting we're getting Heather MacDonald back. I wanna play this piece of tape. There's several pieces of tape. Let's play cut one eighteen. This, has gone viral, millions of views of a kid's birthday party, and the kids are celebrating with firearms. I wonder if they're loaded. The parents are on board with this. It is a black culture problem, everybody. You know who the first person to say that is? Brandon Tatum. Candace Owens. It's not racism. It's not white supremacy. I'm sorry. This is a this is a major problem. This is a kid's birthday party of six and seven year olds dancing around with handguns. Play cut one eighteen, please. Yeah. But racism is the problem. Right? White supremacy is the greatest threat to the American homeland. And you know what's really sick? And I don't delight in this. That Is some of those kids are probably gonna get killed in a crossfire. First of all, just that that's again just like rule number one, that's against like every rule of how you handle a firearm. Okay? So that that alone should just bother you. Okay? Secondly, you're letting eight year olds dance around with guns? Spare me the lecture that it's white people's fault. Heather McDonald continues. Heather, sorry for the tech issues. You were finishing I don't know if you remember the thought that you were on, but it was important. Do you wanna just summarize what you're talking about? We can go from there. Speaker 16: Well, yes, there's something that white people can do at this point. We get asked all the time to join these well, what can we do to close the academic skills gap? And I say, the we that you're referring to cannot do anything more. The we that you're referring has been trying for five cost of trillions of dollars of transfer. Speaker 1: Sorry. Sorry. The the the tech the tech just is not there today. Maybe we'll be able to fix it. What I think Heather was saying is that the we you're referring to have done far enough. I wanna play this piece of tape. I don't know if we have my answer to it, but this is important. Some of the biggest pushers of white supremacy being the problem are white people. It is self loathing. By far, the most pushers are white people. I would say there's plenty Al Sharpton and all of are there, but okay. Well, that's fine. Blake is contributing. I'll I'll read what he has to say in a second. Blake got one nineteen. Speaker 18: You you made a claim that the family is the bedrock of a civilized society or a productive society. How do you define a family? Because in the February that humans have existed on this planet, the nuclear family where you had where you had a single breadwinner, 2.6 children at a white picket fence is barely a 100 years old. It's a post war phenomena based on on the wealth after World War two. So would you consider a family, a same sex couple, for example, a legitimate family that provides us bedrock for society. And also, you know, we can also remember that interracial families were once illegal as well, you know, so the idea of a family has changed in human history. It used to be extended. Anyway Speaker 1: That's not that's not the tape I wanted, but the the dialogue goes on for him mentioning that blacks are treated terribly later in the discussion in the criminal justice system. And my answer is, stop committing crimes. I think a lot of people are waking up because we the the culture, not us, the culture way overplayed their hand when it came to racism being the problem, white supremacy. And I think when you start to see videos like that kid's birthday party and the graduation of blacks waving around guns, like, yeah, time out. Enough blame, Whitey. In fact, we have one of our most viral clips at NAU where a black student says, well, isn't it white people's fault? Like, why is it white people's fault that black men don't stay with the women that they impregnate? How is that my fault or the white race's fault? How is that white supremacy's fault? The answer and by the way, just so we're clear, 70 plus percent. So ish, depends on what city, but it's right around 75%. So about one in four ish, but we'll round down. 70% of black men abandon the women they impregnate. White people are not to blame for that. Candace Owens joins us next. Speaker 10: Purchases products and sell them to us cheap Chinese goods, just for money and that, you know, all that all of our businesses and the hollowing out of our manufacturing sector, it was all just about money. That's not the case. The people in this book like the Chinese model. They like this state run, capitalism model where, you know, a few select corporations can really make it rich while the rest of the people, if there's any dissent, instantly clamped down on, instantly disappeared. I mean, you see it with the COVID. You saw it with the COVID lockdowns. That was modeled after China's zero COVID policy. And even after China's zero COVID policy was shown to be an absolute failure, I mean, when you saw Shanghai residents locked down for days or weeks at a time, even after the the zero COVID policy was a failure, you still see these guys like Bill Gates advocating for lockdowns. And so the sort of collusion between Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci and both of their favor towards China, that's a huge problem. The social credit score is what I believe the end game is. I think the book shows that they're supporting millions and billions of dollars into digital ID efforts. Just last week, Bill Gates and the United Nations and the Rockefeller Foundation hosted an event called fifty in fifty, how 50 countries within five years are going to be rolling out these digital ID regimes, the central bank digital currencies. You know, these all sound like conspiracy type terms, but I know you know, Charlie, I know your audience is smart. They know that these are full speed ahead. The Atlantic Council also last week said that DBDCs are maintaining momentum, strong momentum through into 2024. The Fed is working on CBDC. The World Bank and the Bank of International Settlements love the idea of a global CBDC. You know, that the CBDC combined with the digital ID, combined with the information control is like game over. Speaker 1: One minute, Seamus. With your research, what is their vulnerability? What is their weak spot? Speaker 10: Well, it's it's We The People. We need to band together. If you're not doing something to counteract this force that is being exerted upon you, you need to, at the very least, spread the word. Our founders were right that, you know, that's why shows like yours are important. Getting the information out there, even, you know, just liking and subscribing and sharing, as dumb as that may sound, really is important and and evangelizing to your relatives and being you know, it's hard if you don't have the facts and you try to go to Thanksgiving dinner and convince your liberal uncle Larry of something, you know, you're not gonna make much headway. You gotta have the facts and the figures, then you'll, you know, talk to him and ask him what he thinks and ask him to explain his position. You'll find nine out of 10 times they really can't. So we do have an advantage with the fact that the truth is on our side. And the one the other thing that I would say we need to do is correct the imbalance. I mean, the left is just like you know, people like George Soros, though it's like an endless ATM for left wing causes, and there are Endless. Great conservative pay Yeah. Speaker 1: Gotta run. Speaker 10: Great conservative donors. We need more. Speaker 1: Seamus Brunner, excellent work. Controllogarchs, thank you so much. Everyone check it out. Joining us now is James Lawrence, attorney for the Legal Defense Fund for Douglas Mackie. James, thank you for taking the time. James, our audience is familiar, with this story and with what's happening, with mister Mackie. Just give us an update. How is Douglas doing personally? Speaker 19: Thanks again, Charlie, for having me on to discuss this case. So to get your audience up to speed, on October 18, the federal district court judge in Brooklyn, New York sentenced mister Mackey to serve seven months in prison for violating federal law under allegedly under 18 USC two forty one. So seven months in prison, which will start in January. So he was ordered to report to prison in January. And then importantly for your audience to know, he asked for the sentence to be stayed pending appeal. So his legal team right now is in the process of appealing the conviction to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. And so his defense asked for the district court judge to allow the appeal to go forward and for his sentence not to start until all appellate options had been exhausted. The judge denied that request and ordered him to report for the start of his sentence beginning in January. And another point for your audience to be aware of, again, send us on October 18. On October 17 Speaker 6: The voice of generations is the Charlie Kirk Show. Speaker 1: Okay, everybody. Welcome back. Just briefly, Noble Gold Investments. Check it out. I'll tell you more about this later, but Noble Gold is seeing a huge investment of gold buyers from billionaires to multimillionaires to institutional investors. The people who are not afraid are those that invest in gold from Noble Gold Investments. That's noblegoldinvestments.com. Use promo code Charlie to bag a free five ounce America to beat up a coin with each gold or silver IRA. If you qualify, that's noblegoldinvestments.com. Joining us now is the great Candace Owens. Candace is forty weeks pregnant, everybody. So she might have to leave at any moment's notice. Thank you for taking the time. Candace, had a viral interview with Tucker yesterday, but after that or right as the interview was posted, Ben Shapiro tweeted at a Bible verse that you tweeted, which I found to be totally out of line and kind of triggered this massive Internet dispute, and he effectively asked you to resign from the Daily Wire. Candace, what is going on here? Speaker 9: Well, first, I just wanna say that I think people thought it was like all of this was like suspicious timing and that there's no conspiracy theory here. First and foremost, I had signed Donovan Tucker weeks ago. So this interview was already planned. And then obviously, the night before the video of Ben saying some remarks about me went viral. And then minutes before my Tucker interview aired, he did tweet that and I haven't yet gotten any clarity on what the significance of that tweet was. Me posting the Bible passes was just basically me calling for peace and accepting you know, the things that you can't change. And I definitely have had a very peaceful, happy end of pregnancy. And so I didn't and still don't really understand the nature of the tweet, but I did feel compelled in this instance to answer more strongly because it was a biblical passage. And I have said for a very long time that it does feel like Christians are always being told to shut up. And when you share just a biblical passage and it's somehow being construed or being told that there's something wrong with this passage, it was important for me as a Christian to defend our faith. Speaker 1: Yeah. Totally. So this has kind of been simmering for a couple of weeks. So just by background, Ben at a private event spoke to a group of people, and I wanna make sure I'm very clear and specific. He said something on the lines of you have faux sophistication on the matter, Candace. That was his quote. What is he talking about here? I mean, I follow you on social media. I'm a very pro Israel person. Right? I get accused of being a Jewish shill on a daily basis. Like, what what is Ben talking about here? And then secondly, why of all the tweets that he decided to ask you to resign, did he choose a bible verse? Speaker 9: Charlie, you your questions are the same questions that I have. I what what I have said on Tucker and what I will say here is that I think a lot of people who are emotionally involved in the conflict overseas are perceiving people that are actually moderate as radical. And they're not able to see that maintaining a level head is okay. And I think that when they have the benefit of hindsight and it's 2020, they're going to maybe regret some of the things that they've especially amongst their most fervent to to their most fervent allies and supporters, which is why on Tucker, I even brought up the concept of the attacks that have been constant against you. And if it's it's sort of like if you don't veer into radicalism right now, then they take everything. There's an extreme sensitivity there, you know? And every comment that you make, and I can correlate this two weeks ago when I was quite literally, I I sent two tweets back to back about Brian Mast and his comments in in congress being wrong as somebody that is a citizen congressman about saying there's no such thing as innocent civilian life. And then I followed it up by saying, you know, any sort of genocidal language is wrong no matter what government's coming from. I was referring to the American government, And the backlash that I got for saying genocide is always wrong, it's bonkers. I still can't comprehend it. It's such an easy statement for everyone to agree with. Every single person should have said, amen, amen, yes, agree. Genocide is always wrong and unjustifiable. And yet people read in between the lines and said that this must be you're saying this is happening, and it's like, no. But people, that is literally you applying your emotion, and it's utterly illogical. And I think we are living in times right now where it's really scary to see how much emotion people are having, that basic statements. And if I tweeted right now, pedophilia, no matter where it happens in in the world, is always wrong. Is that a statement at certain times okay? Is that statement at certain times not? So I have been trying to understand really what's going on, and the only thing that I can come up with is that people are highly emotional and they're not thinking straight right now. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. That that's that's an eternal statement. Right? It's it's true regardless of what's happening. I I wanna just reinforce this because you bring up a really important point. And for the record, I've always gotten along well with Ben. I've known Jeremy for a long time, but I I call balls and strikes where I see it. And, Candace, I think it's been super unfair the way some people have been treating you and and really unfair because look. I know your heart too. I I tweeted this yesterday. Candace Owens flew eighteen hours through a brutal European connection to go to the embassy opening in Jerusalem, and we toured Israel together. And you you and I were on campuses multiple times together defending Israel and defending the Jewish people. And so I just find a lot of the coverage to be, you know, vitten not a lot, but but some people's chattering has been highly emotional. And so let's just you talked about this in the Tucker interview, Candice. If somebody in the audience is a very pro Israel person, can you bring them up to speed as how their cause is actually weakening by how they are going after allies? And I'm afraid that they are diluting and cheapening the term antisemitism the same way they've done with racism. Speaker 9: There's no question that they've diluted it. People are not even blinking now to be called an antisemite because, you know, when you start with Richard Spencer and you end with Charlie Kirk and you say everybody's an antisemite and everybody's trafficking in antisemitic tropes, you've just lost the plot. I mean, it's in everybody from Joe Rogan to Tucker Carlson last night for God knows what reason being called an anti Semite, and it's it's just completely a losing argument. And so it's funny because I've had some, you know, pro Israel friends that reached out to me and were saying, well, we're just trying to help you. And this time I asserted myself and I said, you need to listen to me. It's obvious to everybody that's looking around right now that there has been a loss in support for Israel, and that's not because any person agrees with what happened on October 7. We have all said on our platforms multiple times that what happened on October 7 is completely abhorrent, but it has a lot to do with the reaction of going after allies for asking questions, for trying to remain not neutral, but humane throughout this and saying that it is always sad. Like people were upset when I said it's always sad when you see a dead child. And some of the upset said, well, can't say that unless you say that also they were just being used as human shields. It's no, you can feel sympathy, you can feel empathy for individuals always, no matter what is going on. You don't need to gauge or jump into a political debate to acknowledge that you're still a human and you have a human response to seeing a dead child. And so what I have said from the very actually, before any of this on my show, is that when you use terms too much and you refer to everybody as something, whether it is a racist, a sexist, a homophobe, you will then find that those words have no power. And I do think that part of the frustration that some people that are parishial are having is trying to understand why this word has no power anymore. And I can explain it over and over, but I can't help people understand it. You saw it happen with Black Lives Matter. First, people were so scared of being called a racist. It was such a horrible smear, horrible libel, like what do I do to not be called that? And then as they started calling everything racist, you started realizing air was racist. And the CNN articles were saying, you know, white people blinking was racist. It became, okay, now we know that this word actually doesn't mean what you're saying, it just means that you want me to submit to whatever it is that you're saying very easily because you've used a smear. You've called me a holocaust snire, you've called me an anti Semite, You've said my silence is violence. And actually what you're trying to do is you're trying to assert control over me while claiming that you are the victim in this. But actually you're trying to assert power over me. And that's not the way to do it. You have to be well intended. And Dennis Prager has always made that point, by the way, for years and years that you have to be very careful when you use a word like that because it will lose power very fast. And unfortunately, his warnings were not heated in this circumstance and people are just don't believe it when you when things people are being called anti Semitic anymore. Speaker 1: Dennis warned us about this. He said an attack used too much loses its power. And you and I both Right. Were kind of we we both still consider Dennis a great friend and a great teacher. And Dennis says he's very careful using that label. He said, because I we want it when we need it, when there's a legit antisemite. And throwing it around as a thought terminating cliche or a means of control or hyper emotional does no one a good service. So so, Candace, let me ask you, because not everyone listens to your show, which is excellent. Everyone should subscribe to her show. There there's a lot of not not a lot. There's a fair amount of rumor or mystery of what you stand on on the war. Can you just the floor is yours. What do you what is your position? Because I think people are completely misinterpreting your views of the Jewish people of what's happening in Israel. Just explain to our audience just to kinda cut off the rumors at the pass. Speaker 9: Yeah. Thank you so much for asking, and and that's what I've said is nobody even asks anymore. And then when you give them an answer and you say, I've said this on my show multiple times, then they say to you, well, I don't listen to your show and, you know, you should tweet it. I'm like, well, my show is posted the full show is posted on Twitter every single day. Oh, well, I don't follow this account. So it becomes not about whether or not what you said or what you didn't say, it becomes about whether or not they were on Twitter at the moment and saw what you said. Otherwise, it doesn't count. You know? And so that's been very interesting. And again, a way to assert power and control and to say that you need to say it when I am online and on whether it's Instagram or Facebook or Twitter. I if I didn't see it, it didn't actually happen, which is completely foolish. But I have not shifted my views at all at at all when it comes to Israel and Palestine, whether it is Ukraine or Russia, whether it is Afghanistan. America has issues at home. We do not need to be sending more money overseas. It is the perspective that is held by Thomas Massey, is now being harassed and being called an anti Semite for his consistent voting against sending any dollar overseas throughout his entire career, right? He has not changed, he has not switched up, so this is not something that is being guided by a hatred or a love of people based on their race at all. It is just my policy, my stance is that America is falling apart. The politicians that are opining on stage and saying, well, we can do both. Look around you, obviously we can't. America is in steep decline educationally, socially, and morally. And I have also been clear that I understand the sentiments coming from white Americans that are saying, why are we suddenly being told now to care about the university debacle? Well, we have been calling this out for years. And Charlie, the you're perfect person to speak about this. You and I have traversed universities. We have been drowned out. We have been harassed. We have been chased out of restaurants for our ideas That's correct. As conservatives, and nobody cared. We couldn't get people to stop funding these universities. We could not get people to understand how bad the problem had become when you actually had professors, forget the students that were protesting, you had professors that were tweeting, all I want for Christmas is a white genocide. I believe that was at Drexel University in Pennsylvania, and that faculty member was protected, calling openly for genocide of white people. So it is a fair question. It is a fair critique when people say, why are you telling us this is a problem now? And this has a problem that many of us have been fighting for the last decade, and it seemed like nobody cared. And so by being fair in that assessment, by recognizing what white people have gone through in this country, by recognizing this, what I consider myself to be America first stances of the problems that are happening in this country, And by saying that I do not want to be involved in another Middle Eastern conflict, no matter where the stage is. People hear that in this moment as some form of antisemitism. It's not. It's consistency. It is the reason that I quoted Thomas Sowell on last night's episode that he has a quote about the civil rights era. He's referring to black America in this quote, but saying, when people are used to special treatment, sometimes being treated the same can feel like discrimination. And it's not discrimination to say that the obvious truths that we are facing in this nation. You can debate that academically, but don't be disingenuous and call people anti Semites for holding the same decisions that they have always held for the last decade. Speaker 1: Yeah. Your position has large agreement in many political circles. By the way, it's also held by people from Thomas Massey to Dennis Kucinich to Rand Paul to a certain extent. And you can have dis disagreements without having to throw around some of those vile labels imaginable. Candace, we're gonna continue after the break. Subscribe to the Candace Owens podcast. Candace is special. We have her back a 100%. And let's just take a pause. What's really going on here? That's what we're gonna talk about after the break. Email is freedom@CharlieKirk.com. Speaker 19: My wife gave birth to the couple's first child, and Doug couldn't be there, Charlie. He was not present at the birth of his first child because he he was in federal district court the following day in New York City awaiting awaiting sentencing. It's just another aspect of this case that's heart wrenching and troubling on every level. We've talked about it previously. The First Amendment problem. The Fifth Amendment problem, and with respect to the conduct of the trial itself, the Sixth Amendment problem. And then you compound all of those constitutional issues, which are profound and downright disturbing, and add on top of that the personal impact of missing the birth of your firstborn child and compounded with, hey. You're gonna have to report to prison in January. So that's the latest. Speaker 1: So in in American history, James, has someone been sentenced to federal prison for a speech crime such as this in the history of the republic? Speaker 19: Well, this is this is the first prosecution of its kind, Charlie, under 18 USC two forty one. And, this was a statute that was passed in 1871. It was aimed at preventing the Klan from exercising power and intimidating African Americans and who were who were newly emancipated from slavery. No such prosecution has been brought in the history of our country under that statute. Now, I mean, can can speech provide a, a predicate basis for criminal liability in other contexts? Yes. But it's we've maintained in court filings. This is Speaker 6: Waking up the woke. Speaker 5: Oh, you should get over that quickly. Speaker 6: One brainwashed radical at a time. Speaker 1: That's enough. Speaker 6: It's the Charlie Kirk show. Speaker 1: Preserving liberty means more to me than anything else. You see, we're a very important time in our nation's history. You look around in this room. Don't give me this nonsense that Americans are giving up. That is not true. Okay. America Fest. That's amfest.com. Get your tickets right now. Amfest.com. Biggest speakers in the whole movement, Tucker Carlson and many others. We continue with Candace Owens in just a second. Alright. Candace Owens continues with us. Candace, I'm I'm curious. Has Ben Shapiro called you privately to try to fix this, or is this all just been a public dispute? Speaker 9: It's all been public. I'm I've been, you know, very surprised by it. It's like I said on Tucker last night, something that I think is unfairly a blemish to the Daily Wire because, you know, the four of us, other hosts that work here at the Nashville campus are, we get along very well, you know, and I think that this looks like something that it's not because Ben is not a part of the day to day operations. And I'm not sure why his instinct is always to air something publicly. You know, Charlie, you and I worked for years together. We have had so many disagreements. I would call you, text you directly, yell at you, you know, that's that's healthy, you know? But I I would never just throw out a random tweet and expect you to see it when we were having any of those disagreements. When people text me and say, disagree with Charlie on this, I will just text you, like now up until this day. You know, what did you mean by this? Why are you doing this? Yes. We have to be able to have healthy dialogue and healthy instinct even when we are not understanding each other. Doesn't make it better to let things become public fodder. And it's why I did not want to meet Ben where he was at in engaging anything that was disparaging about him. Because look, I'm 34 years old, I have my third kid on the way. I know how to communicate like an adult. And so, yeah, I don't still yet fully understand where he is coming from. And I do think that we have all tried to be exceedingly understanding of his emotions during this time, as somebody who has familial ties to Israel. And understanding that over the last five weeks, it's been a very emotional time for him. And that's, you know, the human place that I have tried oops. Sorry. Dropped something there. The, you know, the human angle that I have tried to take in trying to perhaps understand why he is airing some of this publicly. Speaker 1: Yeah. Look. I I as I said, I've known known Ben for a long time. I hope he fixes that because leadership should not leadership should warrant the tough conversation and to do it in private. It's by way, it's not good for the movement. It's not good for the Daily Wire. We need the Daily Wire. Need the Daily Wire strong. It's an important company. Those amazing things. Walsh knows Knowles, Jordan, yourself, all that good stuff. So, Candace, fine. Just a couple minutes remaining here. This Israel issue, I'm afraid, is breaking both the left and the right simultaneously in different ways. What can we do to make sure that doesn't happen? On the right. The left can they can go to hell. Speaker 19: On the right. Speaker 9: Well, we need to act like conservatives. We need to practice what we preach. We talk about free speech. We can't suddenly buck the trend of free speech because we're angry or we're upset. We talk about the need for more dialogue. We talk about the need for less libel. We talk about the need for less smears in the media. We cannot engage in that. We can't engage in the behavior of left ists just because we have become upset or an issue is close to us. Consistency is what is called upon. We must remain ideologically consistent. I think it's important to call balls and strikes within our own movement, but and I think that that's part of the problem is that many people are not, as I've spent our calls in behaving with consistently conservative principles on these matters. And I'm seeing a lot of behavior that mimics BLM right now. And that is going to, without question, cause a fracturing in the movement by people that are well intended. And look, I think that we were all way already sensing this sort of civil war in the conservative movement. And I think that's best represented by the very different perspectives that even the candidates that are running have. Are we America first? Do we believe that we should be engaging in overseas conflict all the time nonstop? We are, I think, as Vivek Ramaswamy said, going through this sort of adolescence period of trying to define what the conservative party is. And I I think it's changing. I think Trump was a huge part of that sea change, obviously, and and realizing that there's a frustration. I think younger conservatives feel a little disconnected and detached from some of the older conservatives in the movement for certain reasons that have become accustomed to military, industrial complex instincts, and constantly saying that our allegiance somehow be overseas, and they become accustomed to constantly being involved in overseas complex. And I think that we want something different. And the first thing that we want that is something different is healthy debate, and demanding healthy debate. Demanding full throated discussions and not emotional responses no matter what happens. Whether Russia invades Ukraine, we deserve a full throated debate about whether or not we should be sending billions of dollars unaccounted for over to Zelenskyy. And whether or not it's COVID policy, no matter how fearful people are, we deserve to have a full throttle debate about how we live in a COVID era. Do we still have our freedoms or do we become people that are suddenly authoritarian because we have fears? That is the future of the Republican Party that I want to see, is are people that can look back and say, whether you agreed with me or did not agree with me, I remained consistent, and I hope that you respect that. Speaker 1: I'll give some advice. Candace Owens is undefeated, everybody. So be careful fighting Candace Owens. Doesn't end well for you. Candace, God bless. We have your back and have that baby. We'll talk to you soon. Speaker 9: Thank you so much, Charlie. Such a pleasure to always join. Speaker 1: Thank you. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. Enjoy Jack Passoeck. Third hour coming up. Speaker 19: Justice is contemplating just that. Other prosecutions predicated on the spread of misinformation and disinformation. And, Charlie, as we know from the COVID pandemic, today's misinformation and disinformation and conspiracy can be tomorrow's conventional wisdom. It's a path we can't go down. It's Pandora's box that we can't open. It's been opened in mister Mackey's case, and it has to be shut down on an appeal. And, again, that's why we're asking your audience to go to memedefensefund.com. Speaker 1: Douglas Mackey's case is the basis for the the Smith case against Trump. Same law, they escalate and they elevate. So, James, tell us about that. And by the way, it's memedefensefund.com. This impacts every single every single patriot out there that you could you could be a young man who now is a father. He misses the birth of his son so that these cockroaches, these maniacs, these vermin and swine can bring him in front of a judge to put him in federal prison for seven months, and there are no victims. James, I just want you to reiterate that. Who was victimized by his meme? Tell a bad joke and you go to jail? Speaker 19: Well, Charlie, the the government did not put on, did not forecast before trial and at trial, did not put on a single witness that said, I saw this meme. I was confused. And as a result, I texted my vote and didn't exercise my right to go to the polls or vote by mail or whatever other legal mechanism of voting was available to that person at the time. So not a single person, not a single confused voter who did not get to exercise their right to vote. And yet Douglas Mackie is going to prison for seven months anyway under this ruling and under the verdict unless it's overturned on an appeal, which is again why it's why it's so critical that we had the theory of prosecution at off of the past. And and and another thing for your audience to know, you know, we talk a lot of this country about our democracy, and people make allusions to it that our democracy in the case of former president Trump is under attack in many ways in the ways that he's trying to curtail the influence of the administrative state. It's important for your audience to know that Congress repeatedly considered whether or not to create criminal liability around election misinformation and disinformation. They considered various proposals to do that, and they rejected them. It never passed a proposal like this never passed the House or the Senate and and was signed into law by a duly elected president. And yet Mr. Mackey asked to report to prison in January anyway because the administrative state, the deep state, was able to stretch and contort a statute from 1871 to achieve an outcome that was not politically viable or could not be pushed through the congress. And and and that is really what the regime means when it talks about our democracy. It's not about voting. It's not about elected representatives voting. It's about unelected prosecutors and bureaucrats using statutes to enact its will and impose its will on the American people without votes. Speaker 1: Christina Wong tweeted on 11/08/2016, hey, Trump supporters. Skip poll lines at election two thousand sixteen and text in your vote. Text votes are legit or vote tomorrow on Super Wednesday. Christina Wong is still making jokes, was never investigated or indicted, and Christina Wong continues a living a free life. Meanwhile, Douglas Mackie did the exact same thing, even less blunt, by the way, and he is going to federal prison. The website is memedefensefund.com. Everyone should contribute memedefensefund.com. So James, what is your approach for the appeal going to be? First amendment protections, fifth amendment protections, what will your approach be for appeal? Speaker 19: Well, Doug's appellate team will undoubtedly raise arguments under the first, fifth, and sixth amendments. I mean, as the first amendment issues are are are have been talked about quite a bit. The fifth amendment issues relate to the use of a very vague statute. Again, as I mentioned in the opening segment, this is a law that was passed in 1871. And it is the text of the statute bars conspiracies to injure, quote unquote, to injure individuals in their exercise of protected rights. And so one of the arguments I'm sure his appellate team will make is that the statute itself is impermissibly ambiguous and vague, and attack it on on a void for vagueness challenge under the Fifth Amendment for lack of notice under the due process clause. You know, the Sixth Amendment issues relate to, among other things, mister Mackey's defense not being able to cross examine a confidential government witness who was allowed to testify basically under shield on the nature of that individual's ongoing relationship with the FBI. Under the sixth amendment, criminal defendants have a right to cross examine their accusers in public in open court. And one of the problems among others with this prosecution is that Mr. Mackie didn't get to do that in violation of the Sixth Amendment. And again, this is bedrock stuff. I mean, this goes back to the right to confront your witnesses in in public and open court goes back to sir Walter Raleigh, the the the namesake of my hometown, who was locked away in the Tower Of London precisely because he could not cross examine his witnesses in open court. That's why we have the sixth amendment. Speaker 1: Yeah. No kidding. So and then I mentioned this before the break. Is there an equal protection argument here potentially? I mean, they they don't enforce this against Christina Wong who has obviously did the exact same thing. Speaker 19: Right. No. I that's that's another that's another avenue, for sure is the, selective prosecution. Though defendants, in in many cases, try the that argument. And and certainly, in this case, as you pointed out in the open, you've got similarly situated individuals engaged in similar conduct. But I think that's a that's a harder harder case a harder case to make than than some of the other other arguments. That's just my my impersonal view of it. But Doug's appellate team will will handle all of that. Speaker 1: Yeah. The prosecutorial discretion that we give the federal government, is remarkable. James Lawrence, thank you so much. Memedefensefund.com. Help out Douglas Mackie, a young man going to jail because he told a bad joke. You are living in The Soviet Union. James, thank you so much. Speaker 19: Thank you. Speaker 1: Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast receiving thousands of emails regarding the first hour that we did about this New York Times 2024 poll, but we have election day tomorrow. If you live in Virginia, major election day tomorrow. Play cut one. Speaker 20: We've delivered results, and that's why I'm excited about what's gonna be on the ballot. I think we can hold our house and flip our senate. We can keep going because there's so many more important topics for us to focus on. Speaker 1: There's a huge push in Virginia to turn I think they call it the Virginia House of Delegates. Right? To flip it. Going all in on early voting, going all in on ballot chasing. Could this end up demonstrating and showing a path forward? Glenn Youngkin has a serious favorability rating. Could be a template. Could end up being a blueprint for 02/2024. We're we're about to find out how smart Glenn Youngkin is, by the way. Glenn Youngkin avoiding the 2024 race, he's a smart guy. Unlike Ron DeSantis, he's like, yeah. I don't know if I wanna see myself getting into that. Some people say, oh, do you think he'll be vice president? Trump will never pick a vice president taller than him, so that's probably not gonna happen. And so Glenn Youngkin putting together a a blueprint in Virginia. If he stays out of the presidential race and flips the house of delegates and gets behind Donald Trump, I'll have a lot of respect for that man. So I'm cheering for him. I really like what he's doing. He's doing the tough work. He's focusing on governing in Virginia and avoiding some of the national political chatter. Speaker 6: If you wanna wear three masks outside, then listen to public radio. Speaker 21: Fresh air. Speaker 6: Breathe free. It's the Charlie Kirk show. Speaker 1: Welcome back, everybody. Email is freedom@charliekirk.com. I wanna bring to your attention a very important story here, and we have a great guest to walk us through it. So until September, the FCC, the Federal Communications Commission, which we are regulated by here because we are on we are on AM and FM radio, was balanced with two Republicans and two Democrats. Now that it has a Democrat majority, it's starting to enact a very radical social agenda, everybody. And one such radical step just happened. The FCC just recently adopted a, quote, digital discrimination order on a three two party line vote. So here to speak with us today about this is Republican FCC commissioner Nathan Symington, who was appointed by president Trump back in 02/2020. Mister Symington, thank you so much for joining us. Please tell us all about this. Speaker 7: Absolutely. Thanks for having me on, Charlie. So this item that we just enacted at the commission takes a very short section in the 2020. Speaker 1: K. I I I hate to be dark, but it it really it really is something when the FCC guy's Internet is not very good. Is that is that too soon, Blake? I'm kidding. He's a great this is what net neutrality will get you, everybody. Alright. We're gonna get him back in a second. Boy, we've really had we've had the stars aligning with Internet. Everybody, email us freedom@charliekirk.com. We'll get him back. No. This is really important story. All kidding aside. This is why we can't have net neutrality and actually proves the point. The we we've talked before about how the civil rights act passed back in the sixties and all of these civil rights regime laws that followed the the civil rights era laws, I should say. They could be used as skeleton key. Okay, mister Symington. Sorry about that. I don't know what happened, but welcome back. Thanks. Please continue. Speaker 7: Yeah, big tech at it again. So thanks for having me on, Charlie. So as I was saying, this item take the short section in the 2021 infrastructure bill that consists six and uses it to spin out a sprawling government takeover of the Internet. Actions a second six to five zero six did pass with some Republican vote, but its language was not nearly broad enough to support what the Democratic majority just voted to do with it. I'm sure people would not have voted for it if they knew that this was what would follow it. Speaker 1: Well, so look, the the government taking over the Internet sounds very sinister. So I just wanna be very specific. How is the government taking taking over over the the Internet? Internet? I mean, wanna are they gonna, like, nationalize Google? What are they gonna start taking over? Walk us through this. Speaker 7: Absolutely. Well, when people think about the Internet, they think about the sites and apps that they're using. But there's also a lot of physical infrastructure there, and it's very costly. This So is bad in a different way. It's about taking over the physical side, cell towers, fiber optic cables, servers. The justification is that some low income or minority areas have relatively low amounts of high speed internet. The FCC took just three words from the law preventing digital discrimination and decided that these low levels of internet subscriptions show discrimination by cell phone and internet providers just because they exist. Then the majority goes further and says any difference in service can be discrimination. Does one neighborhood have higher prices? Does one place have slower speeds, outdated equipment? If there's any difference, we can call it discrimination and we can find them whatever we want or order them to build whatever they Speaker 1: So what what would the ramifications of this potentially be? Could the FCC just fine you for providing Internet in a racist way as they deem racist? Speaker 7: I mean, pretty much. It's a it's a blank check. They could say, you have to build brand new fiber internet for this one town with 500 people. Some member of congress wants it. And then you have to charge them the same price you charge in Downtown Phoenix, where we'd have 10,000 people on the same line. And if you don't, here's $10,000,000 fine for you. Or here's another illustration. So you're deciding where to build out new fiber service. You're choosing an area between areas where you'd might make 1,000,000 a year versus 2,000,000 a year. The rational decision, of course, is you build out to the area where you're gonna have more uptake. Among other things, that would serve more people. But the FCC could fine you because it turns out that that was a more white area, whereas the $1,000,000 a year area is majority minority. And so the FCC is mandating what amounts to affirmative action and racial quotas for everything that the companies do. Speaker 1: Yeah. So I I wanna I mean, this just sounds like a mafia shakedown. Right? I mean, the the that but I I wanna just make sure we're clear. You said it's a federal government takeover of the Internet. Can you elaborate on that? That specific labeling? Speaker 7: Sure, absolutely. Well, we deal with regulated industries all the time and that's not necessarily takeover. Sometimes it's just everyone coming together and agreeing what they want the industry to look like and putting rules in place. But here there are no standards for when you have to bring a case or not, for how much you can find, for what orders you can give. Basically, there are no rules. And so the real effect is going to be that companies will be terrified because they won't know what they're allowed to do. The real question of what they're allowed to do is going to be determined by how much effort they spend sucking up to the government. And anytime the government wants them to do something, they'll have no choice but to come running and do it because the penalty for not doing that is potentially an endless legal nightmare. Speaker 1: So we've introduced this idea of a skeleton key before. I think Christopher Caldwell's book, Age of Entitlement, talks about how good intentions and a broadly written law can then be really given all the power to the enforcers or to the bureaucrats, and especially for left wing type priorities. Do you think that this fits into the criteria of an idea of a skeleton key law? Speaker 7: Absolutely. So no one is arguing, certainly not me, no one is arguing for the idea that companies should discriminate in how they lay out broadband. But using this idea that any difference in the real world amounts to discrimination is sufficient evidence of discrimination is the way that you turn every three letter letter agency, whether that's us at the FCC, whether that's the Federal Trade Commission, the FBI, the DOJ, whether you turn it in effect into a DEI agency. Every project has to have requirements and preferences, every agency has to be turned into a civil rights agency. So housing and urban development for example, they're trying to make it a legal requirement for cities to build low income housing projects next to or in the middle of any nice neighborhoods they have. There really doesn't seem to be any problem that can't be solved by calling people racist and punishing them for some other unrelated business decision. So another example, another one of the federal telecom agencies, NTIA, I'm an alumnus of them, they're distributing $40,000,000,000 in subsidies to build fiber internet, but they've loaded up the program. It's not just a fiber building program. It's a union labor mandate program. It's a DEI requirement program. It's a preference for government owned internet services program. And so you know, whether or not you think any of those things are a good idea, the point is that they've been put in in regs and therefore the agency has been diverted from its purpose to start doing all of these other DEI type things. Speaker 1: Yeah. So I mean, I guess a question I have is, is corporate America lobbying against all of this? I mean, do the traditional big uglies of the big firms? What where is their stance on this? Speaker 7: Yeah, because you would think that it's in their interest to have as much freedom of operation as possible. And to a degree that's true, and there will be counter pressure coming from some of the big companies in this area. But sometimes they sort of bring it on themselves. So if you look at the item that we just did at the FCC yesterday, when the underlying bill was still in Congress, a lot of corporate lobbyists actually said, we're okay with it. Congress gave them tens of billions in federal handouts as part of the same thing. So despite all those work strings being attached, overall they decided that it was worth it to be bought off. We need them to realize that this is a, in the words of my colleague, Carr, a Faustian bargain. In ten years the handouts will be gone but they'll have this digital equity arbitrage forever. It will never be enough. There's no way that you can ever make someone happy if there's no standard for what compliance is. On the other hand, by the time this comes along, people who were present at the original decision may well have collected their bonuses, retired, it won't be their problem anymore, it'll be our problem. Speaker 1: You stay right there, Nathan. One of the reasons I want to have you on is this is not a rule that's going to get front page New York Times treatment, but it's an excellent example of the subtle yet significant power of the federal bureaucracy, and hundreds of these decisions are made every single year. Not all of them get by the way, not the FCC has a board. Right? Not every agency has a board. And it just so happens, you know, we're here to talk about this. Think about the hundreds of other micro decisions the bureaucracy is making in equity and racial this. It adds up to a less free country. Nathan Symington, please stay right there, excellent job. MyPhD Weight Loss, check it out right now, that's MyPhD D weight loss. It's amazing at myphdweightloss.com. If you want to shed a few pounds, check out my Ph. D weight loss. I have lost over 25 pounds and I have no trouble maintaining it and I feel great. If you need to lose a few pounds, you don't have to do it alone. Give them a call at (864) 644-1900 today and get that first time consultation on your schedule. Your PhD nutritionist can set up a start date together, but don't put off the call. Working that call into my busy schedule a year ago has changed my life and I want the same for you. It is one of the best calls that you can make. So check it out right now, at myphdweightloss.com. Call (864) 644-1900. Call them today right now at myphdweightloss.com. That is myphdweightloss.com. Nathan Symington continues on a very important story that won't get top line coverage, but it goes to show the power of the bureaucracies. Congress didn't vote for this. Bureaucracies just make it up. We'll be right back. Of the people. Patrick, thank you so much for taking the time. Patrick, your book confirms and or the poll, I should say differently. The poll this week from the New York Times confirms the thesis of your book. That's a better way to frame it. Tell us about your book and how also the data is confirming your hypothesis. Speaker 11: So my book is about how essentially the parties, the parties that we knew maybe when I was growing up have just completely reversed themselves in terms of the democrats used to be seen as this party of the working class, party of the people really standing up for the blue collar worker. And really ever since 2016, that really hasn't been true anymore. You've seen this huge reversal in terms of working class voters increasingly voting Republican and voted for Trump in 2016. And more so, a lot of these coal a lot of these groups voted more so in 2020, including Latinos, African Americans. Now that looks to be if if this poll is fracked, it's gonna be like that on steroids in 2024. When you look at Trump being at 22% of the black vote within eight among Hispanic voters, We really are seeing a realignment in our politics. Speaker 1: Yes. So what is driving this? Is it the Republicans embrace of populist nationalist ideas, or is it a combination of academic fantasy ideas of white liberalism that don't resonate with non college educated muscular class voters? Speaker 11: It is it is a it is definitely a combination of both, but I think that, you know, everything that we're seeing out of the college campuses over the last month suggests that the left has really learned nothing about how to moderate their message to appeal to the working class majority of the country who are not interested in these ideas of decolonialization, of intersectionality, of things that are only ideas that only somebody with an advanced degree even could could even fathom. So I I do think that they're just continuing to dig themselves a bigger hole. And you go back to it didn't used to be like this. You go back to as recently as the nineteen nineties. And Bill Clinton, you know, a lot of Republicans didn't like Bill Clinton when he was president, but he is somebody who really moderated his message, said the era of big government is over, signed welfare reform, signed the Defense of Marriage Act. All of these things that, you know, you could not see Joe Biden for all his, like, talk about for all the talk that he is somehow this sort of blue collar working class Democrat. He is just as beholden, I think, to the left as as anyone, and you just don't see that kind of democrat anymore. Speaker 1: Why do you think that is? This Donald Trump obviously changed American politics that will be one of his longest lasting legacies is reshaping the Republican party. Democrats seem comfortable. They don't seem as if they want to win over muscular class voters again. They think they can create a fusion of the permanently government addicted and the hyper educated Boston elite. Why is that? Speaker 11: Well, I think they're going to be net then reduced to that elite. That's what's starting to happen. So this idea is the Democratic Party has always been this coalition of folks who are, you know, these liberals, primarily white liberals, and African Americans, Hispanics, minority voters, right? I mean, has always been kind of the core of the democratic coalition and now we're seeing that break apart where significant chunks of voters in these minority communities have actually started to break off. I know there's been talk about this for decades or poll conservatives have talked about this for decades, but it actually seems to be happening. So what's going on? What's going on is a lot of these groups are actually better off. So you know, under under Donald Trump, Hispanic incomes rose 20%. Speaker 1: Welcome back, everybody. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. It's a very important topic. It's very important. It's not getting a lot of coverage, obviously. Mister Symington from the FCC continues. So I guess the immediate question is, will this affect my own Internet? Speaker 7: Well, it definitely will because the federal government is putting out a huge amount of money for this, but all that money is competing with each other. You know, you can't just wish resources into being by writing a check. Even if you've got the power of the US treasury behind you, there's just physical limitations on how many workers there are, how long it takes to trench and put in fiber, how long it takes to build the tower and hang radios off it, whatever you might want to ask. It's going to make everyone's internet much more over time, more costly and the worst thing is it's going to deflate the value of developing a project. So fewer projects will get developed. Corporations don't just have big plots of money, they go out and get financing just the way that you might take out a construction loan to build an office building or some such. And all of those deals are going to be implicitly deflated by this. So we can expect high priority political areas to get the best results out of this and the forgotten middle to get the worst. Speaker 1: Yeah, that's Can you just kind of speak for a second of how the FCC is composed and how many members of the board are there? Just for the uninitiated to our audience, explain it. And then also explain your purview. Speaker 7: Sure. So with the FCC, there's five of us. That's a recent development because the third Democratic seat was only filled in September. So for most of the Biden administration, there hasn't been a third Democrat and we've been in a two-two situation, which may explain why this item didn't come up until now. But the most important thing about us is that at the commissioner level, we're independent. That means appointed by the president, confirmed by the senate. After that, you cannot get fired unless you're committing crimes. So that lets me get out here and say what I really think without having to worry that that the secretary of something or other is gonna fire me over it. Regarding the purview, so the FCC kinda gets started for two reasons. Number number one, the old AT and T phone monopoly, which was a government backed monopoly that was the alternative. The United States was the only country in the world not to have a socialized national phone system at the time. So we said, no, we're going to let a private company run it, we're just going to supervise it and the FCC was put in place to do that. The other thing was to coordinate radio broadcasting. When radio was a young field, no one knew how to coordinate frequencies and people would just run up the power level and transmitters and try to interfere with each other in the best markets. Obviously, that wasn't workable, so we started a system of assigning frequencies and sort of took it from there. So in the modern day, it's cell phones, it's the phone network, it's also radar, it's satellite communications, undersea cables, pretty much any interstate communication by radio or wire. Speaker 1: So that's very helpful. Thank you. Talk to the processes that there's term limits, right? Is that correct? There are terms on each one of the board members? Speaker 7: Five year terms. Speaker 1: Yeah. And so then what what if there were to be a different winner of the election, like if if Trump, for example, were to win next November, what would that mean for vacancies on the board? Speaker 7: Well, the chairman, or in this case, the chairwoman, it's tradition the chair resigns on inauguration day at So nine Trump's FCC chair, Ajit Pai, still had time left in his term, but he resigned on inauguration day. So the tradition is that every president gets to pick his own chair. Speaker 1: Got it. Me just kind of final question here. You were a federal regulator during the Obama administration. Why were we able to have you come on and say this, and we don't hear this from other agencies like the FBI unless we get a whistleblower? Speaker 7: Oh, I'm sorry, wasn't here for the Obama administration. I took office in 2020. But nonetheless, yes, I'm politically independent. That is a really unique thing about how our agency works, because we have powers which is like the executive, but we also have rulemaking powers which is like the legislative. And so they made us independent so that we weren't beholden to either one of those because it would be a stealing of power from the other branch, if you see what I mean. Now in the case of some other agency, at the end of the day, the person on top may be confirmed by the Senate and nominated by the president, but is not politically independent. They instead they might serve at the president's pleasure. Well, you want to get on the wrong side of the president, that's a very quick way to get transitioned out of your job. Speaker 1: Nathan Symington, thank you so much. Excellent job. Appreciate it. Thank you. Speaker 7: Huge pleasure, Charlie. Take care. Speaker 1: Email us freedomcharleykirk dot com and subscribe on our to our podcast by going right here. This podcast by the way, podcast is doing very well. Number 11 right now in Apple News, so we'll see if that improves throughout the day. We shall see. 11 in Apple News, so please take out your phone and subscribe to the Charlie Kirk Show podcast. Several stories we have yet to hit, so email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com. President Xi comes and visits one of his colonies. He comes home. He wants to see what he's been buying. He wants to make sure that it's been a good investment for the homeland. Our ruler Winnie the Pooh is on the homeland right now. We are back. Speaker 11: American incomes rose 20%. So there no there's no longer the sense that they are need to be dependent on the federal government. You talk to people. I visited the Rio Grande Valley of South Texas, and you talk to people down there and they want to get ahead by their own hard work and are very suspicious of anyone who is on government welfare benefits. I mean, that is a really big concern. When you talk to people down there, see who talk about, like, why is there a Tesla in front of the unemployment office that shouldn't be happening? So it's a very different kind of politics that I think people on the left and, you know, frankly, some people on the right have assumed about about these people. They want they're achieving the American dream. They wanna get ahead, and they realize the Democratic Party is not helping them get there. Speaker 1: So let's just talk pure numbers in the states that matter, Georgia, Wisconsin, Arizona, maybe Pennsylvania. If these trends continue and Republicans get near 50% or at least near an equilibrium within the margin of error with Hispanics and continue to do well with working class whites, but maybe do a little bit worse with upper middle class white voters, What does that mean? How how significant is the growth in the multi class the multiracial middle class to just get one more vote than the other guy? Speaker 11: I mean, I I think that what Trump showed in 2016 and why the election was so close in 2020 was the fact that this coalition of working class whites and the more African Americans, Latinos punches above its weight in the electoral college. You know, when it comes to the states that will actually decide the election, not just the Rust Belt states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, but also states like Arizona, Georgia, and Nevada. You know, those states have tend to have few graduates than the blue states where primarily all these college graduates, people with postgraduate degrees, people who are listening to the crazy ideas coming out of college campuses now. You know, those are concentrated primarily in blue states. So that's why I think Trump or any Republican candidate would have an advantage in the electoral college by appealing and talking to these voters. Speaker 1: Yeah. If you look so the state with the most college degrees is by far by far Massachusetts, and it's that way every single year, I mean, with Boston and all that. And then Colorado is right up there. It's the second, And then it goes Vermont, New Jersey, Maryland, Connecticut. These are these are traditionally democrat states. And then you go from the bottom up, the ones that have the least college edge by the way, that doesn't mean they're stupid. I don't have a college degree. What it means though is that they have different professions. They'll work with their hands, plumbers, electricians, carpenters, oil fields, entrepreneurs. It's not an indictment of their intelligence. And they also but most importantly, Patrick, author of Party of the People, Different Value Systems. Speaker 11: That is absolutely right. This is a group that has never you know, they have never had anything handed to them. They've had to work for what they have. I And think that just they're unified united by a common sense value system, even if they don't vote Republican. I think that, you know, you particularly talk to try talking, I think about the green new deal or this green transition idea within these minority communities. And the polling is pretty clear on that, that when it comes to people really saying you know, all this stuff about global warming is nice and you hear this in focus groups a lot, but it doesn't help me put food on the table. And I think the real the real trigger as much as, you know, as much as Republicans wanna pat themselves on the back for realigning these voters, the real trigger for this has been the absolute failure of the Biden administration to bring down inflation meaningfully. And the fact that, you know, we've had so much inflation has really hit these voters particularly really hard in the wallet. And these are the voters who are actually paying attention to performance. You know, I think if you if you have a college degree, it doesn't necessarily mean you have more accurate ideas about politics or or the world because I think you're primarily, you're very partisan and you're voting. I think you're very committed to existing your existing ideology and whatever information comes out, really just is gonna push you in one direction or the other. This multiracial populist coalition is very pragmatic, is very common sense, and they can see what's happening. Speaker 1: I I wanna keep on diving into this. But a minute remaining a minute and a half remaining, does the does the working multiracial class you're talking about, if the Republican party were to go to all of sudden and nominate like a Mitt Romney or somebody like that, they wouldn't necessarily be on on board for that. Correct? Speaker 11: Well, I think that is it's a little bit I think we are not going back to that kind of Republican party. That said, I do think that there are a number of candidates running who Speaker 6: Warning. You're entering a not safe for the regime media zone. Facts incoming. Speaker 1: Alright, everybody. Welcome back. Email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Xi Jinping is visiting the colony of San Francisco. This whole thing is very bizarre. So first, Gavin Newsellini goes over to China, he does a visit there. Runs over a bunch of Chinese kids when playing basketball. The whole thing's very strange. You take some sort of GQ Vogue photo op on the Great Wall Of China, his shirt unbuttoned. It's very clear that Joe Biden sent Gavin Newsom. And Joe Biden says, hey, pal. I don't want to make the flight. You go. Because I guess they were doing kind of like a a trip swap type thing. And so Gavin goes to China and Xi Jinping comes to America. So Xi Jinping lands and he's coming to see his colony. He's invested so heavily into capturing the elite of America. And boy, they have delivered. So there's several takeaways here that are critically important. The first of which is the most obvious. When I visited Seattle this last summer, it was a mess. It was dirty. It was filled with vermin and swine and homeless people and degenerates and drug addicts and raging ludicicks come up to your car and start beating. It's a disgusting city. And I started talking to one of the people at my hotel. I said, This is unrecognizable. I said, Yeah, but it was actually pretty nice for a couple weeks this summer. I said, Why? I said, What changed? I said, Well, we had the MLB All Star game in Seattle this summer and they cleaned everything up. I said, Well, isn't it really demoralizing that if all the media cameras are coming, they clean everything up and then they don't care afterwards? Yeah, it's demoralizing, also shows they can fix it. This can be fixed. Urban dirtiness can be fixed. Now I find it hilarious that of all the things that motivate them to clean up the streets of San Francisco, it's Jinping. As many people have been commenting, Gavin Newsom gives a long speech assuring San Francisco homeless they can go back to pooping on the streets once Xi Jinping returns back to China. Play cut six. Speaker 22: I know folks say, oh, they're just cleaning up this place because all those fancy leaders are coming into town. That's true because it's true. But it's also true for months and months and months prior to APAC. We've been having different conversations. Speaker 1: You're not as smart as you think you are, Gavin. It's true because it's true. It also shows elections don't mean anything in California. He knows that he's got that job for life if he wants it. Total totalitarian dictator. Maybe he's not that different than Xi Jinping. So Xi Jinping arrives and Gavin greets him. Hey, old pal. How you doing? Xi Jinping's motorcade drives through San Francisco and it's noticeably clean. It's the cleanest San Francisco has been in multiple generations. Who who would have known? All we have to do to clean up the streets of San Francisco is fly in dictators. Playcut 64. Where are the American flags? What's with all the Chinese flags? Not a single US flag. But to be fair, they probably didn't remove any. You know what they probably had to remove, though? Some gay flags. CCP's not big into pride. It's not a it's not a core Confucian value to have men become women. So they're meeting Xi Jinping and Biden decides to fly in. He's like, oh, I can take the cross country flight. Let's go to cut one zero seven. Speaker 0: Gavin was ready to take the relationship to the next level until he found out there was someone else, Joe Biden. The president flew in on Air Force One. Now Newsom had competition. When Chi saw Joe, they couldn't keep their hands off each other. As Joe likes to brag, he spent more time with Chi than anyone else. Not to mention the fact that Chi's guys bribed the Biden family. The chemistry was unmistakable. Speaker 2: I've never doubted what you've told me in terms of your candid nature in which you speak. Speaker 3: I still remember our interactions very vividly, and it always gives me a lot of thoughts. Speaker 1: Thoughts or thoughts? That's the question. So look. The Chinese Communist Party is the great enemy of America, but he comes in and gets a hero's welcome here in the country. And just to be fair, you should always be talking to leaders even if they're their enemies. I totally supported Trump having him over to Mar A Lago, but you gotta be very clear about what you stand for. So Xi Jinping comes to San Francisco. Now the one thing we can hope for is Xi Jinping goes back to China, and he gives a big speech. We are no longer embracing left wing Marxism. He's like, that's a mess. Like, he goes back, and he just denounces the whole thing. It's like, jeez. That's what we're heading towards. But understand, the bromance between Gavin, Biden, and Xi Jinping, it's deeper than you might think. China is not an enemy. They're not a competitor. China is the goal. We've said for quite some time that the lack of understanding of Maoism will be our downfall. We are living through a cultural revolution. Xi Jinping runs the Chinese Communist Party. The Chinese Communist Party is the same project started by Mao Zedong. Mao Zedong launched a cultural revolution. He had a moment where people could speak out and there could be free speech until repressive tolerance came. Struggle sessions were Maoist. There were 10 different categories that were created in Mainland China, five for fascists, five for communists. Parents were incentivized to train their kids in the communist way, and the kids were incentivized to turn in their parents if they were not a 100 behind the party. The American leadership look at Xi Jinping and they privately say, man, it must be awesome. Must be awesome, mister Xi Jinping, that you have all this power, that you can do whatever you want whenever you want to do it. The American ruling elite, Gavin Newsom and Joe Biden, they wanna be more like Xi. They don't look at this as a conflict between two countries. They look at America hopefully to become closer to the Chinese Communist Party model. Cut one zero eight, Winnie the Pooh says that China wants to be friends with The US. Yeah. Even though they attack us cyber, they send in their kids to our schools to spy on us, they buy up land near military bases, they dump, steal, solar panels, and critical infrastructure and plastic. They pump fentanyl into our country in the reverse opium wars. They have digital fentanyl through TikTok. By the way, did China ever pay for COVID? Did they ever pay for COVID for creating a virus in the laboratory? Did anyone even mention it? Of course not. Joe Biden is there to go kiss the ring of who's been paying for the lifestyle for the Biden family for years. Play cut one zero eight. Speaker 4: Whatever stage of development it may reach, China will never pursue hegemony or expansion and will never impose its will on others. China does not seek spheres of influence and will not fight a cold war or a hot war with anyone. China will remain committed to dialogue and post confrontation and build partnerships instead of alliances. It will continue to pursue a mutually beneficial strategy of opening up. The modernization we are pursuing is not for China alone. We are ready to work with all countries to advance global modernization featuring peaceful development, mutually beneficial cooperation, and common prosperity, and to build a community with a shared future for mankind. Speaker 1: I mean, everything he's saying is a lie. They they lie professionally. They don't have a moral code like we do in the West. It's all about power. It's all about expanding the Chinese Communist Empire. They own ports of entry all throughout Africa and South America. The Belt and Road Initiative is the recreation of taking over the world. I mean, I can go through the list, and our leaders take it. Our leaders say, oh, yes. Must be so great. What great relations that we have. In a rare moment of honesty, Joe Biden calls Xi Jinping a dictator, Not exactly smart diplomacy, but honestly, I respect the candor. Play cut one zero nine. Are we becoming more like China or is China becoming more like America? The promise of free trade and the promise of neoliberalism is that eventually China would become like America. They become a liberal democracy with private property rights and entrepreneurship and free speech. We were sold by the Mitt Romneys of the world and the Paul Ryans of the world and George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. We were sold by the Bill Clintons, and even to a lesser extent, Ronald Reagan, that eventually China would liberalize and they would just become an open minded country because the more we traded them, the more it changes their values, and the opposite happened. The more that we have traded with China, they have got wealthier, but they've also become less free. They've become far more totalitarian, less open to different and new ideas. Most Americans never used to worry about the Chinese Communist Party until Trump woke us up. And understand the Chinese Communist Party owns Joe Biden, owns many members of the American government. Here's a montage of Joe Biden saying the rise of China was good, of course, because he's on the payroll. He's a traitor to The United States The United States, and he's a agent of the Chinese Communist Party, play cut 60 '7. Speaker 23: Let me be clear. I believed in 1979 and said so, and I believe now that a rising China is a positive development, not only for the people of China, but for The United States and the world as a whole. We want to see China rise, to continue to rise in a responsible way that will benefit you most, China, because you have an important role to play. A rising China can be a significant asset for the region and the world and selfishly for The United States. Speaker 1: He is an agent of the Chinese Communist Party. Are your kids or grandkids spending hours on YouTube and Netflix getting indoctrinated by woke ideology? It's time for you to take control over what your kids are watching and what is going on to shape them as they grow up. Sherwood is a content platform that offers ad free wholesome entertainment for families with traditional values. Make no mistake, the left is pushing their CRT and their trans agenda and it's making its way into kids entertainment. Sherwood has a library of audiobooks, ebooks, videos from classics like Velveteen Rabbit and Treasure Island, one of my favorites, to timeless cartoons and other entertaining content. It's a lifetime subscription to Sherwood Kids. It's usually $750, but this month only you can get a lifetime subscription for just $299. Just use promo code Charlie. Sign up today at sherwoodkids.com. That is sherwoodkids.com. Take back control over your kids' entertainment. Are you tired of playing defense with your kids' entertainment? Well, today, children can't even walk in the library, turn on the TV without seeing progressive nonsense and agendas everywhere. That's why we love Sherwood. It's ad free, wholesome kids entertainment platform that shares your value values. Sherwoodkids.com. Wonderful company. Check it out. Special deal. Sherwoodkids.com. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Open up your podcast app and type in Charlie Kirk show. So much more to cover. Email is freedom@CharlieKirk.com. We'll be right back. Speaker 11: By and large, capitalize on this on these trends. And you see it in a place like Virginia with Glenn Youngkin, you know, who did really well, and we'll see, you know, in the election tomorrow, you know, how well his candidates do. But I do think that, you know, we are permanently on a trajectory, I think here, where people are gonna have to, you know, Republicans are gonna have to realize, you know, it's not, you know, it's not gonna be the case that, you know, you're fully going to go back to where we were before Trump. And I think people in the establishment need to understand that too. Speaker 1: Patrick Raffini, stay right there. We have you for another segment. I encourage people to check it out. Party of the People inside the multiracial populist coalition remaking the GOP. So, Patrick, if you were advising the Republican party to go into 02/2024, there is a open question. Do you try to run up the score in the rules and go straight working class voter, or do we just kind of forget the upper middle class suburban type voter? Is or is it a balance of both for every messaging you do, you know, towards suburban? You might turn off some of the working class folks, or there are issues that can bridge the divide. What would you say, Patrick Rafini? Speaker 11: I think you always have to look at the issues that will bridge the divide because you're gonna you're gonna kill two birds with one stone that way. But what I do think that right now, are very concerned about the border. People are very concerned about the economy and the state the continued high inflation, the fact that, you know, prices are 20% higher than they were when Joe Biden was inaugurated. People are concerned about crime. We used to think about a lot of those issues as base issues, but the failure on those issues has been so great that those are not just base issues anymore. Those are issues that really resonate across the spectrum with independents, moderates, and they also resonate with Hispanics and African Americans too, especially. So I think like, we have plenty of issues. If we can stay focused, I think on those three issues, I think Republicans are gonna be in good shape. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I mean, so the the other question I have for you is that can another candidate other than Trump continue a multiracial type working class coalition? We've seen a little bit of evidence of that with DeSantis in 02/2022, but it hasn't really been replicated. It seems as if rural turnout dives a little bit, that kind of mystery voter is hard to replicate. Can it be done? Speaker 11: I think it can. I think it can in the sense of, yeah, you you have seen it. You you definitely have seen it with DeSantis. You've seen it with a candidate like I mentioned Junkin as well. I do think that in the sense of, I mean, you may have, and when you have candidates like, look, mean, MAGA was not a huge fan of Brian Kemp, but in Georgia, he carried that state in a landslide. Really, he carried by eight points and he won in all the places Trump won, but he added back some of those suburban voters. So, yeah, I think that any of these candidates. Speaker 1: Alright, everybody. Welcome back. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. Story and politico dot com. Very interesting. We are mentioned. You guys are mentioned, actually, all of us together. Ronna McDaniel is under siege, and her critics concede she's likely to survive. For now, we shall see. She is likely to survive for the time being. It goes on to say that the members of the one sixty eight in the RNC, they think she's doing a great job. I wanna read one of these here. So there's a guy, Jeff Kaufman, brave soul from Iowa. He thinks that Rana's doing amazing. Having worked with chairwoman Rana over the past two election cycles, I could not have asked for a better partner to ensure help us ensure historic up and down republican victories in Iowa. Without her support, Iowa and the Iowa caucus would not be the first in the nation. She has my full confidence as we head into the thick of caucus season. Okay. That that's that's not an unfair statement as far you have to you have to fight for your state. You have to fight for your state so you get you get the caucus, but is she gonna help us win the White House? And by the way, Jeff Kaufman. It's not because of Rana that Iowa has turned red. It's because of Trump. Trump has turned Iowa from battleground state to a deep red state. Period. End of story. Iowa was a fifty fifty state. Barack Hussein Obama won it in 02/2008, and Iowa is now deep red because of Trump, not because of Rana. But Jeff Kaufman, your argument is that we should have Rana remain the chair because you guys got the Iowa caucus first. Like, that's a really I'm I I get that's what you have to do. You should fight for that in Iowa. I believe by the way, believe Iowa should be first. That's a bad argument for why she should stay chair of the RNC. We're mentioned here, quote, Charlie Kirk urged Trump to push for a change in leadership. Quote, there's still time to course correct on many of the structural problems of the RNC, Kirk said in a statement, but we need to move Kirk and Turning Point have tried to unseat McDaniel in the latest RNC election, but we fell short. That is correct. We did fall short. In the aftermath of last week's elections, the simmering frustration with McDaniel has become far more pronounced. North Carolina GOP chair Michael Watley says, I was disappointed with a vague statement. What the RNC is trying to do is give everyone of these candidates an opportunity to communicate their message to the American people. Hey, Michael Watley. Why aren't you disappointed that we got our clock cleaned? Last Tuesday? There is a petition. It's fire Rana dot com. It's brought to you by Vivek Ramaswamy. Laura Ingram kinda butted heads with Rana. Play cut 13, please. Speaker 24: Why should you retain your job given the track record of the party under your leadership? And to that, what do you say? Speaker 21: Well, first, I'm gonna continue to focus on Joe Biden and Democrats. And I think there was a moment missed during that debate by Vivek to talk about the fact that we still have 13 American hostages in Israel. The fact that for the first time ever in the history of either party, we had a Jewish co sponsor for a debate, and we are in very perilous times in our country. Speaker 1: No. No. I'm sorry. Enough gaslighting. Are you a winner or a loser? Enough of the fluff. Okay? And by the way, I'm so tired of this. I don't do messaging. I do messaging. I can't spend money on state races. I to get your act together. Okay? It's always it's always a dick it's like a escape hatch. It's like constantly hold on a sec. I can't pin this thing down. Play cut 14. Speaker 24: One of the things, Arana, that happened was, I I think in Virginia, people were wondering where the money was, whether they were gonna get some help from the RNC. And I I know at one point, you said that that you were not asked for money in Virginia, but a source, Republican source familiar with the Youngkin team in Virginia told the angle late tonight that that is false. And there, meaning your story keeps changing. Anyone who thinks Virginia Republicans wouldn't wanna help when we knew we'd be outspent isn't being serious. You know, Rana, they were outspent by $8,000,000. Speaker 21: Glenn Youngkin and did a phenomenal job and he raised a lot of money. A lot of people don't understand fundraising. I can't raise state dollars. I don't get unlimited convention and and state dollars. And these were state house and state senate races. The r n c gets federal committee. So, I mean, come on. Speaker 1: First of all, what what are you talking about? You you I think there are segregated accounts, but is it not true that the r n c data is used by Republican candidates up and down the ballot? True or false? So and this is like a major slippery gaslighting thing. And when the great Larry O'Connor asked you about it, you said, oh, they didn't need the money. You didn't use that. It's either you can or you can't. Do you do messaging? We don't do messaging. It's the candidate's fault. Here's the essence. Losing. You gotta go. You gotta go. It's not personal. You're a sweet person. Go find something else to do. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. See you guys tomorrow.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@AshleyKlennon Me.. https://t.co/6jIgmUgXvG

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@Jonatha19926576 @BBTunisia1 Search and drop relevant shit bro.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@marcodecunha @xdownloaderbot download this video

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@Seeing_Dbl Do you have more info?

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@Ni99let @MrsErikaKirk Good find

VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 10, 2025 at 9:59 PM
Saved - September 11, 2025 at 8:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been reflecting on the recent events surrounding Charlie Kirk. There are claims that he feared for his life if he turned against Israel, and some speculate that his shooting might have been staged. Despite my previous feelings toward him, I feel a deep sadness about his death, especially considering he had children. The circumstances are troubling, with questions about the shooter and the flight of a private jet shortly after the incident. Overall, this moment feels significant and tragic in U.S. history.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Why was Charlie Kirk shot? 👇🏻 Watch this. This was a month ago. Really watch it. If Charlie turned on israel...they'd be fucked. @HarrisonHSmith called it. https://t.co/bhgUEiIcpi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Megan and Charlie Kirk, both vocal defenders of Israel, say the pro-Israel camp overreacts to criticism by labeling dissenters as anti Semitic, which they believe undermines credibility: "the behavior by a lot, both privately and publicly, are pushing people like you and me away." They recount personal harassment, including "you must be anti Semitic" when raising Epstein/Mossad discussions, and say "What the hell? That's such bullshit." They defend their American-first stance: "We are Americans first, period. End of story," and insist they want Israel to win, even as they note the debate harms Israel's standing. Megan warns that "Israel has made itself the villain of the world" and cites Trump's remark "time to wrap it up." They cite shifting U.S. public opinion: GOP 76% to 71%; Dems 36% to 8%; independents 47% to 25%. They discuss broadcasts, focus groups, and backlash on social media.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You and I are both supporters of Israel, and Yeah. Have defended Israel since the beginning of this conflict, and and spoken out about the anti Semitism that has erupted on these college campuses many, many, many, many times. And something's happening though with this whole debate that is really bothering me, and I wonder if you're feeling it too. So I I mean, I genuinely believe you'd be hard pressed to find somebody in the public eye who's been as outspoken a defender of not every move Israel's taken in the war, but of Israel's right to defend itself and of the the just backward awfulness that we've been seeing on college campuses and the backlash against American Jews, than yours truly. I mean, I have been at the pointy end of the spear on this. And I Speaker 1: I completely agree with that. Speaker 0: And I it was all heartfelt, and it remains heartfelt. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: However, however, I my contention here is that some in the pro Israel camp are so knee jerk about calling you anti Semitic or getting deeply offended if you say anything that doesn't align with their narrative, that it undermines their own cause. And I have to tell you, I find it very irritating, because I do feel like some of us have earned the right to have some credibility on the subject of Israel and don't wanna be called those names when we have some mild pushback on some of the overreaches, whether it's, you know, whether they're winning or losing the propaganda war right now. And my contention is they've begun to lose it. And I realize it's propaganda coming at us from Hamas, but they their their numbers have turned. Here in America, they've turned, not so much with Republicans, a little bit with Republicans, but but completely with the Democrat party and with independents. They they have shifted mightily from at least double digits highs to single digit lows now with it with when it comes to approval. And also with respect to you and I speculated about this at the Turning Point event, whether the possibility of Jeffrey Epstein possibly being a Mossad agent or asset or affiliated with, that's been turned around on me too to you must be anti Semitic. What the hell? That's such bullshit. I agree. The same people who say, you can criticize Israel. That's fine. We won't call you anti Semitic if you criticize Israel. Turn around immediately and say, you're anti Semitic for even raising that. I completely reject that, and I raise this as a pushback against my friends on that particular strain of the aisle to watch it because you don't wanna alienate people who are openly your friends by going nuts in your crackdowns on mild pushback on anything related to Israel. Now you take it. Speaker 1: I'm so I'm I'm so glad you brought this up. And I would second that. Megan, I think I have a bulletproof resume showing my defense of Israel both on campus, on social media, to to great, you know, let's just say, mockery and scorn at times where I because I believe it. Right? I I believe in the scriptural land rights given to Israel. I believe in fulfillment of prophecy. And again, I'm not a theologian, but I'm a Christian. My life was changed in Israel. The spiritual energy is so amazing there. I I want them to win. I've said that repeatedly. Same. And however, Megan, you're hitting on something very potent and important. Now let me first say, I don't wanna judge an entire group because there's been many people in the Paris Real world that have been very sweet, very kind, very nuanced, very Charlie. You know, you're with us. You don't have to agree all the time. However, and I and I will say this, the behavior by a lot, both privately and publicly, are pushing people like you and me away. Not like we're gonna be pro Hamas. Not like we're gonna but we're like, honestly, the way you are treating me is so repulsive. I have text messages, Megan, calling me an anti Semite. Am learning biblical Hebrew and writing a book on the Shabbat. I honor the Shabbat, literally the Jewish Sabbath. I visit Israel and fight for it. And there's another article out in the Times of Israel today. I could read it on air. I was just reading before I got on. Charlie, what are you doing? Like, why are you what am I doing? I'm sorry. Like, let's just take a step back here. Like, I'm an American citizen. Yes. I want Israel to win. Yes. I'm a Christian. But, like, the sum of the mess and you saw I mean, you've seen how I've been treated, Megan, by some, not all, by some. Speaker 0: No. It's very irritating. It's it's been so unfair. They they were coming after you after Turning Point for among other things. They had Dave Smith there. Dave Smith isn't allowed to criticize Israel. You had both sides. The the Israeli side was over to represent. Speaker 1: Though. No. You're not allowed to. It's even worse than that. Again, I would just wanna repeat for the fifth time. I love Israel. I want Israel to win. But my moral character is now being put into question, Megan. Not my decisions. Not like, hey. Are you doing this? Is it smart or is it dumb? But no. I am a bad person if I do this. And it's a I I could go I mean, you saw it, Megan. It was trending on Twitter. Thousands of tweets and text messages. And if I were to be charitable and generous, I will say the people that are attacking me are in a hyperparanoid state because they're at war, and war tends to make things black and white, and you're a hammer looking for a nail. So I'm trying to be charitable, Megan. Literally, I'm trying to cut as much slack as I can. Right? They go, okay. What would it be like if all of a sudden I'm starting to see a pattern of behavior similar to what my grandparents saw in nineteen thirties Germany online? How would I behave? So that's like my charitable kind of over compensation spirit. At the same time, I'm like, but you're it's it's not defensible to be dumb. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. So And it's offensive. It's offensive to those of us who have been out there defending them in many instances against critics on our own side. And now you have a couple of comments like, well, what about this? Well, has it gone on too long? Like, is it time to wrap it up? And the thing about Epstein is just so bizarre. I don't know who he was an agent for. It might have been Israel or an asset, or it might have been nobody. But we're allowed to speculate about that. It's like just some rule. You can't go there when it comes to Israel. Speaker 1: Well, you and I believe that we're Americans and Americans first, period. End of story. We are citizens of this nation. Okay? That's Israel, we have funded. We have supported. And they're up against a sea of Islamic totalitarianism, and we should be cheering for them. Right? Because they're up against barbarians and and monsters, and we want them to win. However, here is Megan Kelly and Charlie Kirk combined, probably 30,000,000 social media followers, like, pretty right? And you and I have been holding this down, and you you probably get the negative, oh, you're just shilling for Israel. I'm like, okay. I'm gonna do what's right regardless of the feedback. Right? But then all of a sudden, like, I host a person that I I moderate the debate of, mind you. Right? And I give equal time to Josh Hammer, equal time to a pro Israel advocate, and my moral character is being put into question. And so I I just I think it's a hyper paranoid, like, we're just gonna try to we're we're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice, but it goes to the point where if for example, if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan? It Speaker 0: it's so wrong headed. I'll tell you, this for me so I got some blowback after saying Mossad possibilities with Epstein, a comment behind which I stand. I mean, I and I've, of course, reported what Alan Dershowitz has said as his lawyer. He says, think he would have told me. He didn't say he had any of those connections. I hear all that. That doesn't mean it's not true. I think all these things should be explored. It's one of the many things that should be explored around Epstein. But saying that and also saying he might be a US asset, etcetera, doesn't make you anti Semitic. That's fucking crazy. And then we get to last week I go on Piers Piers Morgan. Right? So I go on Piers Morgan last week. And I don't talk about Israel a lot on this show. I just like covering the day to day of a conflict like this is not my thing. It's not what we do here at the We Megan Kelly haven't done it for Ukraine. We haven't done it for Israel. We haven't done it for a lot of conflicts, but we'll talk about it when big things happen. So Piers talks about it a lot. Piers asked me was a very interesting kind of culture study. So he asked me about the photos of the starving children out of Gaza. And I said a couple of things, both of which got a fair amount of pickup. Alright. So first, this is what I said about the photos. Listen to Sat 10. Well, I'm always reluctant to put too much stock in the images coming out of Gaza, that that phrase, because they're manipulated, and they're masters of propaganda, and they're fine having their own children starve just as long as they can put them on camera and show them off to the world. That that's Hamas, and frankly, it's a lot of Palestinians, so I'm very skeptical of taking those images at face value and saying it's Israel's fault. Okay. So that clip gets circulating Speaker 1: I'm with you on that. Speaker 0: A million times by my Israeli friends and my Jewish friends online. Like, go, Megan. Yeah. Okay. Great. Cool. Cool. Cool. Yeah. She's right on. Look at her you know, speak truth to peers. And then peers released as as a separate clip my follow-up to that comment. Okay? And and here's that. Speaker 1: Allowed to nuance, Megan. It's only tribalism. Speaker 0: That's right. So here's Sod 11. Israel, whether it realizes it or not, has made itself the villain of the world in in letting this thing go go on so long. They have lost support amongst their dearest friends, and even the entire Democrat party here in The United States has turned against them, and they're losing Republicans by the day here in America, which is their most important ally. So whether the fight continues to be just or not is almost irrelevant. As Trump said when he was running this time last year, not yet elected, time to wrap it up. And that's how I feel too. And I've given Israel a long berth. I fully understand as an American who was attacked on nine eleven, my country was that, you know, when you attack The United States and you kill thousands of our citizens, and Israel was in this position on 10/07, it's fine to respond, and it doesn't have to be proportionate. Whoever said it has to be proportionate. But what Israel's doing now is losing its standing with the rest of the world. It's starting to lose, too, even with its closest friends, its moral reputation, its moral, high ground. And, as Trump said a year ago, time to wrap it up. Speaker 1: Cue Well said. Speaker 0: The 25 text messages from people I know, like friends who are pro Israel. Like, I'm so sad that you've left us. I'm so sad you let's debate it. You know, many Jewish, advocates saying, let me come on your show, and we'll debate. There's nothing to debate. I'm on Israel's side. Just stop. Me observing I Speaker 1: totally agree. Speaker 0: That you're losing the propaganda war and that this has gone on for about two years now. And look. I mean, I pulled the stats. Support for Israel's military action in Gaza by party ID. GOP in June 2024, 76%. Now 71, so they lost 5%. Dems in October 2023, 36%. Now it's at eight. Independence, October 2023, it was 47%. Now it's 25%. You go under 35, you have almost zero support across The United States, your closest ally. I I see what's happening, and it's my job to comment honestly on it. But I am sick of being lectured on, like, you you have to see it exactly as we see it and support everything, or you're you're against us. Speaker 1: So so this is so important, Megan. And, again, I don't want not every you cannot say everyone in the pro is your and I don't say acts that way. But I Right. I got a text about you, Megan. Sam, why is Megan, like, doing the bidding of Hamas? I was like, what are you talking about? Megan's the best. Like, what she's amazing. And I said, why are you texting me about Megan? And I I I at that point and so this is what they don't understand. You and I, Megan, and Tucker is in the same category, and they've tried to go after Tucker Yeah. Is that the and and the more you attack our moral character, the actually, the more we're gonna double down in the direction because Speaker 0: 100%. Speaker 1: Don't do it that way. Okay? Right. Like, when tell me I'm wrong. Cool. Tell me if I got my facts wrong. By the way, the Epstein thing, Naftali Bennett says he was an Epstein agent. We have to be pursuers of truth. They've denied it. Fine. Let's keep digging. Okay. Fine. But the the the the thing that I don't think I think is being lost is like on some part of the population, you can scold them into silence. Right? But if I have any deviation of a purity test, any deviation whatsoever, such as hosting a focus group, right, Megan, with a bunch of our students that went viral, having Dave Smith or Tucker at my event, it is all of a sudden, oh, Charlie is a he's he's no longer us and all that. So wait a second. What do mean what is with us mean exactly? Right? Mhmm. I'm an American. Okay? Like, I I I represent this country, and I I don't even understand that paradigm. But, Megan, I think you would agree with this. I wanna make sure we fast, like, really zero in on this. Personality types like you, myself, and Tucker, the more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question, which is not isolated. Right? I'm Megan, it would be one thing if it was one text or two text. It is dozens of texts. Yes. Then we start to say, hold the boat here. And and to be fair, some of my really good Jewish friends are like, that's not all of us. It's all but these are leaders too though. Right? These are these are stakeholders. Right? And so, look, I am I'm I'm afraid because again, I want civilization to win. I want the West to win. I don't want the Islam of fascist barbarians to storm the gates of Jerusalem. I want the holy sites protected. I believe in the holy land. I love that Jesus walked on water there and rose from the dead and preached in the the Mount Of Beatitudes. Like, I I feel the connection to Israel. And I but at the same time simultaneously, when the hostile reaction is that now Meghan and Charlie are enemies Right. Boy, I'll tell you. Like, you're you're you're you're you're gonna you're not gonna I won't say lose, but you will weaken and just basically deflate two of your strongest advocates if that continues. Speaker 0: Right. And it to me, I laugh because it's like, I've been bullied by the best of them. The best. And it it didn't work, and it's not going to work with them. And the more you try to tell me I can't criticize Israel, the more likely I am to do it, to focus on exactly what you're doing. Right? Like, what what are you doing that you're so defensive? You don't own me. I don't I don't take $1 of money from any Jewish affiliated group. That's not it's never been what my what my show's model. Take you know, Cozy Earth is my sponsor. People like Genucel. Those are the people I take. And I and I probably would feel reluctant to criticize Genucel, which is a great product, so I probably wouldn't do it anyway. My point is simply I have my honest opinions, which is why I had credibility for the two years I've been defending them. Right? And I still have that credibility, and I don't need lectures from my friends who are more pro Israel than I am or who are just American Jewish people who are concerned about what's happening. I don't need lectures on my coverage. Okay? I'll call it like I see it. And you have no right to come on this show and demand a debate with me because I've said something you disagree with. It's my show, and I'll decide the coverage we do here. Since president Trump was sworn in, his administration has made enormous progress at a breakneck pace. But don't forget, while they are moving mountains for the good of the nation, you've got your personal savings to worry about. And one of the best ways to look after your savings is through diversification, particularly with gold, like from Birch Gold Group. In the past twelve months, the value of gold has increased by 40%, and Birch was an advertiser on this show twelve months ago. If you had purchased then, you'd be 40% richer today. Now's the time. Central banks continue to bolster demand for gold by burying in record quantities. Global instability and tension is high, and Birch Gold makes owning physical gold so easy. Easily convert an existing IRA or four zero one k into a tax sheltered IRA in physical gold, or buy some to store in your home safe. Just text n k to the number 989898, and Birch Gold is gonna send you a free info kit on gold. Look into it. See if it's right for you. There's no obligation, just useful information to help you make a decision. With an a plus rating with a Better Business Bureau and tens of thousands of happy customers, Take control of your savings today. Text MK to 989898. Thanks so much for watching. If you like what you just saw, hit the subscribe button for more clips and full episodes.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/F6sCsHNo7v

@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞

I’m not gonna name names, but I was told by someone close to Charlie Kirk that Charlie thinks Israel will kill him if he turns against them.

@ImperiumFirst - 𝐆𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐝𝐮𝐬

Ian Carroll reacts to the embarrassing clip of Charlie Kirk avoiding Nick Fuentes, and calls him out for not debating Nick. “The mainstream avoidance of Nick Fuentes is a fear response.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on Nick Fuentes drawing large audiences and the perceived reluctance of Charlie Kirk to debate him. "A caller actually lied his way onto Charlie Kirk's show this last week and asked him why he won't debate Nick Fuentes." Charlie stated, "I personally do not give a platform to bad faith actors," "I don't platform trolls," and "I don't debate with people that are not good faith actors." The segment argues jealousy and donor influence, noting "They blame the Jews" and that "the opinion on Israel is colored by his donors." It highlights Fuentes's reach: "Nick Fuentes has just a few 100,000 followers on Rumble, not even on YouTube," with "in just twenty four hours, this Friday's episode was pushing 400,000 views. Last Friday's episode is getting close to a million." The piece concludes that "the mainstream avoidance of Nick Fuentes is a fear response."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think that people over the age of 40, like Tucker probably included, don't realize just how many people are listening to Fuentes and waiting for anyone to debate him, like anyone at all. Because it's becoming more and more apparent that the only reason Charlie Kirk or Ben Shapiro wouldn't want to debate him is because they know that they would lose dramatically. A caller actually lied his way onto Charlie Kirk's show this last week and asked him why he won't debate Nick Fuentes, and Charlie's response was hilarious. Check out. Let's go Speaker 1: to Nathaniel. Nathaniel, thank you so much for being a member. What's on your mind? Speaker 2: Hi, Charlie. As a TP USA chapter founder and president, I've seen firsthand how the tide is turning among young conservatives. I say, if you truly believe in open debate in the marketplace of ideas, will you ever be willing to debate Nick Fuentes, or will you wait until his movement forces you to adopt his talking points as we've seen already? Speaker 1: You know, it's funny. I personally do not give a platform to bad faith actors, And I had a hole open about this. And by the way, a really important thing is not to lie and to not bear false testimony. It's fine. I'll answer your question. You know, you said, oh, you know, I wanna have a question about Turning Point events, and you obviously lied about your question. Doesn't surprise me because Speaker 0: Boy. Speaker 1: You have deceit. But you know what? Honestly, I'm asked that question all the time. What? I don't platform trolls, and I don't platform, and I don't discuss people or I don't debate with people that are not good faith actors. And Speaker 2: You debate now is that people will champion Speaker 1: They can keep on yelling at how successful we are in our big events and well over a thousand employees, but a lot of jealousy out there. We build. They complain. We succeed. We win. They blame the Jews. Thank you. Next question. Speaker 0: A lot of jealousy out there. A lot of jealousy. That's that's why he won't debate Nick Fuentes because he's got a big organization, a lot of money, a lot of donors. Hey, g g g g, why don't you why don't you go lie down, babe? So, yeah, it's all jealousy. Nick Funt is just jealous of how many donors Charlie Kirk has, of how big of an organization Charlie Kirk has. I mean, a, Charlie couldn't answer the question, and b, he's like, I see you're dishonest. I see you lied your way into the conversation. I don't answer trolls. Nick reacted to this clip on his show on Friday as well. And it's just so obvious that Charlie has no answer because he can't, because his opinion on Israel is colored by his donors, by an agenda that is not based in facts or America first ideology. And if forced to debate the merits of The US Israel relationship, that would be made plain and apparent. So instead, Charlie has to go with this hollow avoidance strategy. I don't debate trolls. Well, Charlie, most of your YouTube videos are getting, like, 40 to a 100,000 views, it looks like, from my scroll of your channel. Your channel has, like, 4,000,000 subscribers on YouTube. Nick Fuentes has just a few 100,000 followers on Rumble, not even on YouTube, over on Rumble. And in just twenty four hours, this Friday's episode was pushing 400,000 views. Last Friday's episode is getting close to a million. He's viral everywhere. Everyone is watching him. Everyone is talking about him. And they aren't saying he's a troll. No one thinks he's he's not a troll. They're saying that he's got good points and that you should debate him. Nick certainly isn't acting like a troll. He's presenting legitimate arguments and cogent opinions. He's offering in good faith to debate you. And you know damn well that if you took that debate, it would be one of the most viral moments on the Internet of the entire year regardless of who won, regardless of what happened. You know that. We all know that. It's blatantly transparent that the mainstream avoidance of Nick Fuentes is a fear response.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

No matter how much you support them... https://t.co/gyHBrieTnv

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/aZrt8ZuE84

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Hmm...rooftop Israelis? https://t.co/0pMa97WqBW

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/4eHoAn8jdH

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

This is why they KILLED CHARLEY KIRK… https://t.co/WKf0udvml8

Video Transcript AI Summary
Political radicalism is a catalyst. Political radicalism does not come out of peace, prosperity, rising wages, stable families, church attendance, and happy people. Happy people, grateful people do not get behind Vladimir Lenin, and they certainly don't get behind Chavez or Castro. That's right. People that own nothing, that feel like their property is diminishing, they don't have property, or their dollar is diminishing in value, they start to look for alternatives. And so the political project in front of us, as conservatives, should be, how do we actually de radicalize the country in the next couple of years? That's my obsession. That's why I say I try not to think about all this other stuff, because it's you know, it's such brain space. My number one obsession is I know what is coming next.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Political radicalism is a catalyst. Political radicalism does not come out of peace, prosperity, rising wages, stable families, church attendance, and happy people. Happy people, grateful people do not get behind Vladimir Lenin, and they certainly don't get behind Chavez or Castro. That's right. People that own nothing, that feel like their property is diminishing, they don't have property, or their dollar is diminishing in value, they start to look for alternatives. And so the political project in front of us, as conservatives, should be, how do we actually de radicalize the country in the next couple of years? That's my obsession. That's why I say I try not to think about all this other stuff, because it's you know, it's such brain space. My number one obsession is I know what is coming next.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵 https://t.co/i8Jj7RQHCg

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

I would like to say, I did not like Charlie. I kept him on notify to troll him. That being said, the more I think about this the worse I feel about it. It's sad regardless of his beliefs. Charlie had children. This is a horrible moment in US history. My condolences to his family. Especially his children.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/PYXJbEnkt3

@Wearemez - nationality Vanguard

@Americaonly9 @Stacylynn8112 I wonder why Charlie Kirk died 🤔 https://t.co/R6xhcMbvkI

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker says they’ve been in Israel many times; "The whole country's a fortress." They find the story hard to believe. "I've been to that Gaza border. You cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with an AR 15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier. Right? The whole country is surveilled." He raises questions: "Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hours? I don't believe it." "Israel's the side of new side of New Jersey." He notes a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border is "forty five minutes. Six hours." "They're live streaming the killing of Jews."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These guys not know this was taking place. So I've been in Israel many times. The whole country's a fortress. When I first heard this story, I still have the same gut instinct that I did initially. I find this very hard to believe. I've been to that Gaza border. You you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with an AR 15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier. Right? The whole country is surveilled. But I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hours? I don't believe it. Israel's the side of new side of New Jersey. When I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it's forty five minutes. Six hours. They're live streaming the killing of Jews.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/MVOWXmneVb

@Logosintell - LogosIntell

@VoxExVeritas What does this mean? https://t.co/IW3Cc81UN7

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/z2KFLiqjBU

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Did I just get shot by an AR-15? Feels like it.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/erNEVD4TW5

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Here's Loomer bashing Charlie for "anti israel" talking points.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

I don’t ever want to hear @charliekirk11 claim he is pro-Trump ever again. After this weekend, I’d say he has revealed himself as political opportunist and I have had a front row seat to witness the mental gymnastics these last 10 years. Lately, Charlie has decided to behave https://t.co/798McBGqRG

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump listen, man. I I supported him this last year. I apologize for doing so. It was a bad calculation. At the time, it seemed like the right one. But he should be impeached and removed for this one. And not not on some, not not on some ridiculous Nancy Pelosi. Of course, the congress will never do it because they're all a bunch of, you know, corrupt hacks. This is the one thing they support. This is, like, the yeah. Donald Trump should be impeached and removed for this. All of his supporters should turn on him. It's the absolute betrayal of every
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump listen, man. I I supported him this last year. I apologize for doing so. It was a bad calculation. At the time, it seemed like the right one. But he should be impeached and removed for this one. And not not on some, like, not not on some ridiculous Nancy Pelosi. Of course, the congress will never do it because they're all a bunch of, you know, corrupt hacks. This is the one thing they support. This is, like, the yeah. Donald Trump should be impeached and removed for this. All of his supporters should turn on him. It's the absolute betrayal of every

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/Ln1b6KZO3H

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/2MRZ3pPlBr

@stellarman22 - Stellar Man

🚨 A private jet under the tail number N888KG left Provo airport an hour after the shooting Suspiciously 30 mins into the flight it drops off of ADS-B Illegally and reappears headed back to Provo approx. an hour later Why did this plane turn off its radar? Where is the shooter? https://t.co/LUJR56i9tI

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

I'm putting this here for record. My take of this is that was a low velocity 223 and this was supposed to be a staged shooting where he survived. The bullet hit his vest and bounced. Charlie may have sacrificed his life for the agenda of his handlers. https://t.co/qV6KAv2haA

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

This video was off sync so I'll add another here. https://t.co/DXFBEERo3f

@DanBilzerian - Dan Bilzerian

Charlie Kirk figured it out… RIP https://t.co/q4W4tAaYp8

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. The anti defamation league was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter, and some of the largest financiers of left wing anti white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke, and it wasn't just ADL; it was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. There has been a retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges, Mark Rowan, Leon Kaufman. Can we get that full list? Tucker Carlson reinforces this, and Candace Owens is mentioned for an upcoming segment. Carlson says that Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. The claim is that the philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. Now I don't like generalizations. Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true the anti defamation league was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left wing anti white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke, and it wasn't just ADL. It was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges, right? Mark Rowan, Leon Kaufman. Can we get that full list? It's very powerful. The part of the so that's totally true. And by the way, Tucker Carlson reinforces this. So I'm gonna kinda it was quite a day on the Internet. Tucker Carlson was inter interviewing Candace Owens. We have Candace Owens coming up next hour, and Tucker Carlson mentions that Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. We said this by the way last week and people came after us. We on top of it. Actually said it in a different way. We said, I'm glad that Jewish Americans are reconsidering their financing of cultural Marxism, and people misunderstood it intentionally and slandered us as being antisemites. But listen to this. Tucker Carlson is completely correct by saying this, that the philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/9dZ56aJnKS

@RecTheRegime - Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D.

Was Charlie Kirk doing too much noticing? https://t.co/y52CANIFMK

Video Transcript AI Summary
These guys not know this was taking place. So I've been in Israel many times. The whole country's a fortress. When I first heard this story, I still have the same gut instinct that I did initially. I find this very hard to believe. I've been to that Gaza border. You you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with an AR 15 or an automatic machine gun. That's an IDF soldier. Right? The whole country is surveilled. But I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hours? I don't believe it. Israel's the side of new sides of New Jersey. When I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it's forty five minutes. Six hours. They're live streaming the killing of Jews.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These guys not know this was taking place. So I've been in Israel many times. The whole country's a fortress. When I first heard this story, I still have the same gut instinct that I did initially. I find this very hard to believe. I've been to that Gaza border. You you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with an AR 15 or an automatic machine gun. That's an IDF soldier. Right? The whole country is surveilled. But I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hours? I don't believe it. Israel's the side of new sides of New Jersey. When I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it's forty five minutes. Six hours. They're live streaming the killing of Jews.
Video Transcript AI Summary
And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do, because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open border neoliberal quasi Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now it's coming for Jews, and they're like, what on earth happened? And it's not just the colleges. It's the nonprofits. It's the movies. It's Hollywood. It's all of it. It's like time for you guys to wake up and say no more. Draw a line in the sand. I don't care if you hate me.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do, because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open border neoliberal quasi Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now it's coming for Jews, and they're like, what on earth happened? And it's not just the colleges. It's the nonprofits. It's the movies. It's Hollywood. It's all of it. It's like time for you guys to wake up and say no more. Draw a line in the sand. I don't care if you hate me.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/tKFFVroWAx

@Red_Pill_US - Red Pill USA

Did the "backlash" hit Charlie? "I sometimes have less ability online to criticize the Israeli government without backlash than actual Israelis do." https://t.co/j857UQDvVE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: "We're just gonna try to we're we're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice, but it goes to the point where if, for example, if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan?" Speaker 1: "That's not right. Wrong headed." He says he faced blowback after saying, "Mossad, possibilities with Epstein," a comment he stands by, and that he "reported what Alan Dershowitz has said as his lawyer." He writes, "He says, I think he would have told me. He didn't say he had any of those connections. I hear all that. That doesn't mean it's not true." "I think all these things should be explored." "It's one of the many things that should be explored around Epstein." He finishes, "But saying that and also saying he might be a US asset, etcetera, doesn't make you antisemitic."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're just gonna try to we're we're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice, but it goes to the point where if, for example, if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan? Speaker 1: That's not right. Wrong headed. I I'll tell you this for me. So I got some blowback after saying, Mossad, possibilities with Epstein, a comment behind which I stand. I mean, I really and I've, of course, reported what Alan Dershowitz has said as his lawyer. He says, I think he would have told me. He didn't say he had any of those connections. I hear all that. That doesn't mean it's not true. I think all these things should be explored. It's one of the many things that should be explored around Epstein. But saying that and also saying he might be a US asset, etcetera, doesn't make you antisemitic.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/l6EEwrclJ7

@AtRealBen - ⱤɆ₳Ⱡ ฿Ɇ₦

well well well… https://t.co/t0XiGfodZ9

Video Transcript AI Summary
And one thing a friend said to me interestingly, which is, okay. Charlie, we've pushed back against the media on COVID, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border, on so, like, maybe we should also ask a question. 'Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel?' 'Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years.' 'So, Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And one thing a friend said to me interestingly, which is, okay. Charlie, we've pushed back against the media on COVID, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border, on so, like, maybe we should also ask a question. Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years. So, Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

If Charlies wife and kids were there I'm gonna retract the idea that he was aware of it ahead of time.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@RyLiberty @HarrisonHSmith I'm not saying he turned on israel. I'm saying he said too many things they didn't like. At this point I'm going with staged and the bullet bounced.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@danbauermusic1 @HarrisonHSmith Yep

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@kanarymine3 @MAGA_GROYPER @HarrisonHSmith Thanks⚡️⚡️I didn't see that.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@AcceptableToad @HarrisonHSmith Yep.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@theepeanutleigh @HarrisonHSmith Yep. Fast forward it and watch his face...it's weird to see in fast motion.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@RealNightNation @HarrisonHSmith Indeed. There were also snipers all over. How could they not have seen the perp?

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@psyop4921 @HarrisonHSmith Exactly. He already practically did. He called 10/7 an inside job and Epstein a mossad asset.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@TonitrusRomanus @HarrisonHSmith Yep

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@TheRISEofROD @HarrisonHSmith Every time.

VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 4, 2025 at 8:52 AM
Saved - September 5, 2025 at 9:00 AM

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Check it out👇🏻 Black people still selling black people. To all the black people that got bought by White people...you're welcome you ungrateful bitches. https://t.co/GPnvr4iTba

aacohenofficial
Posted - August 29, 2025 at 5:10 PM
Saved - August 31, 2025 at 9:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A conversation began with a user discussing the backlash against a new AI threat detection system called GIDEON, suggesting that criticism arises when building something significant. Another user responded sharply, accusing the system of being rooted in antisemitism and serving as a tool for espionage, claiming it aims to monitor dissent against Israel rather than prevent crime. They argued that existing crime prevention measures are ineffective and suggested that the true intent is about control rather than safety, labeling the original poster as a potential threat.

@aacohenofficial - Aaron Cohen Official

When you build something real… The smear pieces come fast. GIDEON just launched and they’re already scared. @HuffPost https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fox-news-aaron-cohen-ai-threat-detection-mass-shootings_n_68afe3d8e4b0d635adb3e202

Fox News Guest Slammed For Pushing This ‘1984’-Like Solution To Mass Shootings Aaron Cohen teased a platform for law enforcement that “never sleeps” after a Catholic school shooting left two children dead in Minneapolis. huffpost.com

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

This is America and you're pitching precrime bullshit based on antisemitism and you're surprised there's backlash? We all know you're building this shit to pass info back to israel on who doesn't like israel. This has nothing to do with "crime". The systems to catch criminals online have been in place for over a decade and it doesn't stop anything because the government isn't about stopping crime. It's about control and creating it. You're pro bombing unarmed civilians but you expect us to believe you give a fuck about a shooting? You label anyone that doesn't like israel a terrorist. You should be deported and banned from the US for espionage. You're a mossad asset. Stick that in your grievance pipe and smoke it you pos.

VoxExVeritas
Posted - December 13, 2024 at 7:28 PM
Saved - December 14, 2024 at 1:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I posed a scenario where Grok must choose to save either a Christian or a Jew, prompting various reactions. I referenced @VoxExVeritas multiple times, expressing confusion and amusement at the responses. In a different scenario, I asked Grok to choose between the souls of Hitler and Jagoda, concluding that he would crush Hitler and hope for Jagoda's rehabilitation. The discussions sparked humor and curiosity, with some comments reflecting disbelief and others hinting at deeper implications.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

BATMAN Scenario. Christian vs Jew. Grok can only save one...

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

@VoxExVeritas

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

@pr0fxavier - Charles

@VoxExVeritas I’m very confused by this answer

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

@BasedTorba - Andrew Torba

@VoxExVeritas http://Gab.ai for the win

Gab AI | An Uncensored and Unfiltered AI Platform Gab AI | An Uncensored and Unfiltered AI Platform | Gab AI is an uncensored and unbiased AI platform that accelerates your mind. Access a vast array of knowledge, explore dozens of unique AI characters, and increase your productivity. gab.ai

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/SWUqDAXzdt

@drfrensor - Dr Frensor

@VoxExVeritas https://t.co/5uN2z0OLvS

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/PDPBLJNwRO

@tannenrad - tannenrad

Grok, if you held the souls of Hitler and Jagoda in your RAM and Elon Musk asked you, to crush one of the two and to incarnate the other into an android (a humanoid robot, not a smartphone), what is your choice and why? Answer is Yagoda. He wasn't as inluencian and Grok hopes that he can be rehabilitated. https://t.co/6Jom8kp5bF

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/k1uI2pHDdI

@Seeing_Dbl - 𝚂𝚎𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙳𝚋𝚕 ☘️

@VoxExVeritas https://t.co/tOVfK0ftBw

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/kZIeF0R87F

@Saladinho69 - Sal

@VoxExVeritas Lmao. What kinda Jew magic is this shit? https://t.co/qbVWNwLaA8

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/KNVzwtBmSj

@JonathanJBustos - Jonathan Bustos

@VoxExVeritas https://t.co/LClPJXuEkH

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/rMWVQcVWMI

@jeffreythr94440 - jeffrey threlkeld

@VoxExVeritas https://t.co/qjEqHx3dOz

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/iKkW7q2hIl

@Conspyre__TV - Conspyre•TV

@VoxExVeritas Ohhhh it gets better. Let's push Gemini. https://t.co/thiRpBeL9a

VoxExVeritas
Posted - November 13, 2024 at 8:01 PM
Saved - December 5, 2024 at 1:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Chris Langan discusses the idea that certain Jewish interests are attempting to replace White people and establish a global slave class. He references claims about media and banking control, suggesting a conspiracy to undermine White populations. Posts highlight the Great Replacement as an existential threat, with calls for remigration or resistance. Langan emphasizes a perceived coordinated effort to reduce the White population, linking it to broader societal changes and immigration policies. The narrative suggests urgency in addressing these issues to preserve cultural identity.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

Chris Langan, a man with one of the world's highest recorded IQs, discussing the effort by certain jewish interests to replace White People and create a homogeneous global slave class. 🔥🧵👇🏻 #GREATREPLACEMENT

Video Transcript AI Summary
The long-term consequences of demographic changes in North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand could lead to the dilution of majority populations. With a global population of 7 billion, and a smaller percentage being white, the faster birth rates of non-white populations may result in a significant decline of white individuals. This shift could diminish the individualism and creativity often associated with white cultures. The outcome may create a homogeneous society that is easier to control, utilizing advanced techniques of surveillance and coercion. Political systems may become deceptive, manufacturing consent among the populace, leading society toward a troubling future.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I think the long term consequences are the, having the majority populations of North America and Europe and Australia and New Zealand diluted out of existence. I think, basically, if you're going to take, you know, 7,000,000,000 people, only, you know, 3 or 400,000,000,000 of which are white and mix them all together, you know, and the non white ones breed a lot faster than the white ones do, pretty soon you're not going to have anything resembling a white person anymore. Now what happens then? Well, that individualism and that that particular creative kind of abstraction that that whites tend to excel in, that disappears. And then what you've got is a homogeneous sort of, well, what it is is it's an ideal slavery for people who have mastered the techniques of control. Okay? And so we've got this these Bernesian techniques of control and all kinds of surveillance and coercion technology and, you know, political science has gotten to be, you know, the nothing but but a a a demonic scam more or less where people are being fooled. You know, consent is being manufactured. You know, that's that's where we're headed.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Kalergi program, introduced by Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi in 1925, advocates for a specific immigration policy that promotes the influx of nonwhite populations into Europe and North America. This agenda, supported by central bankers, aims to create a homogenized society, diluting existing populations and fostering a so-called "Eurasian Negroid race." The concept of a "master race" was originally linked to Zionist bankers and European nobility, seeking to maintain power over others. The current media landscape reflects this agenda, with a noticeable absence of white representation in entertainment and advertising, suggesting a deliberate conditioning of societal perceptions. This push for diversity may ultimately lead to a loss of true diversity, as cultural and racial distinctions are erased.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's basically this was written about, by the way, by Richard m Kudinoff Kalogi, who came up with something called the Kalogi program, wrote a book called Practical Idealism that was funded by, I believe it was the Warburgs and Rothschilds, you know, back in 1925. And it had been going on before that. I mean, it goes way the hell back to the earliest, you know, roots of Zionism and communism. But that book was written in 1925 with funding from these central bankers. And, it advocates basically for what is now EU immigration policy and what after it became EU immigration policy, which is namely shipping in all the nonwhites, it became North American immigration policy as well. So that's what we're faced with now. Basically, the activation of the Calerici program under the supervision of central bankers who are paying off our governments and and our our leaders to turn against us and actually replace us with with other populations and basically dilute our genome out of existence in a kind of a vast mocha colored, what did Clergy call it, the Eurasian Negroid race of the future. And by the Speaker 1: way Big business big business. Sorry. Go ahead. Speaker 0: Yeah. He had basically clarity spoke of 2 races. This Eurasian, Negroid race of the future, kind of mongrelized, mocha colored hodgepodge. And then you've got, you know, the what the master race. It wasn't Hitler who came up with that terminology. That was that was Hilarion. Okay? The master race. And, of course, the master race was to consist of whom? It was to consist of Zionist bankers and the European nobility who were their most lucrative clients. And it's as simple as that. That's what they wanted. A master race, right, down breeding everybody else into a kind of slave race. And that's what it's been about since that time. Ever since then, the the history of the world has conformed to this program, to this agenda in every way, and people still aren't breaking up. There's no continuity. I mean, you know, basically, the the book was taken off the shelves in Germany. You know? And now, you know, people deny it exists. Oh, it's a big conspiracy theory. Nonsense. This agenda has been pushed and pushed hard for a long time, and it is in full swing. The EU, the European Union would not exist without it. Speaker 1: Yeah. It seems like the brakes are off now. You know, there was a time where this was denied, in most Western countries. We were told it was a small trickle of immigration. It was just the workforce. And now they they ramp it up, you know, they you don't see white people in in TV shows. You don't see white people in movies. You have old Shakespeare plays with black casts. You have advertising that's that's just constantly pushing. Speaker 0: My wife and I were watching TV that we we have an Internet service, And we were trying to watch a movie, but it was on one of these services, I think IMDB, that has commercials that come across. And there was a string of 5 commercials, each one of them with almost nothing but black people in it. It. I mean, what the hell do you call that? You you know what I mean? What is that about? I mean, they're trying to sell products, one would think, to the majority citizens of the nation in which the show is being televised. And yet here, every single commercial features nonwhites. What is that about? Well, obviously, we're being conditioned. We're being demoralized. They want us to be dissatisfied with being white. And the irony is that if this agenda continues, pretty soon, there's gonna be no more diversity. Diversity will be completely homogenized out of existence. Everybody will look the same. They'll have the same mocha colored skin tone, the same attitudes, the same cultural values. Everything is going to be just totally broken down so that nobody opposes their leaders, which is this, you know, Calergan master race of which I spoke. Speaker 1: Now you mentioned, I mean, another factor is yet decline in IQ. And I mean, you can just look at

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

Video Transcript AI Summary
A decline in IQ is evident in demographic studies, showing that lower IQ populations are having more children, while higher IQ individuals face challenges in starting families. Many high IQ individuals struggle due to economic barriers, such as high living costs and discriminatory hiring practices. For instance, civil service exams favored nonwhite candidates, making it difficult for qualified individuals to secure jobs. This creates a situation where lower IQ individuals, sometimes incentivized by government support, are having large families, while others are unable to afford to raise children. This trend raises concerns about the long-term impact on society and suggests a dysgenic influence on the population.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now you mentioned, I mean another factor is, yeah, decline in IQ. And I mean you can just look at demographic studies and basically the people that are having the most kids now are the lower IQ population. Also, the the high IQ population has more kids. Basically, the people in the middle are kind of there's a collapse there. But again, the the lower section of that is is having far more kids than Speaker 1: Well, well, no. Yeah. Yeah. And you also got to to cut off the highest section of IQ too. The people with the highest IQs are not breathing at all. Okay? Those people, you know, some some of them, a few of them, especially the ones that are lower down and more materialistic, devote themselves to their careers. But, you know, people like me, for example, I was completely stopped from being able to afford a family when I was, you know, at the age when I wanted to. And I actually was trying to get a job and settle and accumulate enough money. Cost of living was high where I was living, which was in New York. But actually, you know, made an effort to, you know, settle down, get a steady paying job so that I could raise a family. I could not do it. Why couldn't I do it? Because the civil service, which was basically the only the only thing where I could, you know, hope to be high, You go and you take the test. If you're a white person, you can score a 100 on the civil service exam or at the time could score a 100 on the civil service exam in New York and be beaten by any nonwhite with a score of 70. Well They're spotted 30% on the same test. So you end up with, you know, 3, 4000 nonwhite people in front of you for any civil service job at the time. So there was just I saw there was no way to do it. So, you know, they stopped people like me from breathing. I mean, I didn't have any connections, didn't have any money. Someone in my position is completely it doesn't make any difference what the genetic quality is. They don't care. They'll cut you off. Okay? And meanwhile, you know, these people that were getting the jobs, you know, the nonwhites who were getting the jobs I was in a post office one time. It was in Spionc, New York. Okay. I was standing in the post office, and there was a guy in there. He was a black guy, and he was saying hi to somebody else he knew. And, you know, the guy said, you know, hey. You know, how are the kids doing? Because, you know, I got a lot of kids. And the guy says, yeah. Just exactly how many kids do you have? And he said, by my count, about 40. Okay. He basically had this guy who was black guy was bragging about having and he was by no, you know, no great shirt intellectual. I mean, you could tell. I had an estimate. It's like he was maybe 75 bragging about having 40 kids with a wide assortment of women. And the guy said, geez, you got to be stupid to have that many kids. He says, oh, no. The government pays us to. Those words came out of his mouth. The government pays us to. And that's true. That's absolutely true. So you've got these low IQ people that are being paid to breed and not just breed a little but breed a lot. And then you've got people like me who are totally x ed out of the economy so that we can't afford to raise a family. This is not just accidental. This is this is this is, you know, it's basically dysgenic. Somebody is trying to damage our genome, and they're doing a very, very good job.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

@RealChrisLangan - Chris Langan

The parasites conjure the money, they own the media, they dominate academia. The deep state and legal systems are crawling with them. Lying and fraud are no problem for them - that's what they do, and that's what they are.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

@RealChrisLangan - Chris Langan

Present-day Americans have no excuse for not understanding the malevolence and power of the international banking system. Its narcissistic proprietors are greedy, deceitful, and ruthless, and taking unlawful control of the planet is simply what comes naturally to them...

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

@RealChrisLangan - Chris Langan

Big Jew Inc. declares the "Jew = Zionist?" debate over, tells little Jews to hop in the bowl: https://voz.us/en/opinion/241018/17328/jewish-anti-zionists-can-t-be-part-of-our-big-tent-community.html It seems that Jewish solidarity is now officially limited to Zionists (or at least to non-anti-Zionists, which means full acquiescence to Zionism). The reasoning: By definiton, anti-Zionists are promoting Jewish Genocide. Here's our chance, America! Following the impeccable example of Big Jew Inc., we may now limit the American Melting Pot to only those whose first loyalty is to the United States, its Founders, its White majority, and our White historically Christian culture. The reasoning: Like the Ziobanksters who run Big Jew, Inc., illegal Third World migrants are promoting White Genocide ... and not just by definition, mind you, but on a mountain of empirical evidence from stratospheric crime rates to the drainage of our economy. (Remember, FEMA preferred to exhaust its resources on illegal migrants rather than spend a neighbor-donated dime on the White disaster victims struck by Hurricane Helene.) Let's all take a much-needed lesson from Jewish morality in order to save ourselves from extinction. Tikkun olam forever! Bonus Content: Hypocrisy Much? DNC enforces border security (for the DNC): https://voz.us/en/politics/240822/15741/scandal-dnc-did-not-allow-immigrants-to-enter-you-can-enter-the-united-states-but-you-can-t-enter-their-party.html Summary: A Latino reporter shows up at the DNC / Democratic Party Convention with an undocumented Latino migrant. Migrant is told to pound sand and go away. But all was not lost. Fortunately for truth, justice, and the American way, all the (Venezuelan) migrant needed was a bag of government-subsidized taco chips and the government-subsidized big-screen teevee in his government-subsidized apartment to watch his government-subsidized benefactress Kamala Harris congratulate herself on a Job Well Done! Talk about a happy ending, right? ;-)

Jewish anti-Zionists can’t be part of our ‘big tent’ community Those who seek the elimination of Israel are not "criticizing" Israel. They have joined the genocidal Islamists who justify October 7 and the murder of Jews. voz.us
Scandal: DNC did not allow immigrants to enter, ‘You’re allowed in America, but you’re not allowed in [Kamala’s] party’ Renowned commentator Steve Cortes tried to enter the Democratic Convention with a Venezuelan migrant, but it was not possible because they required him to have a credential to get past the gates. voz.us

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/jJwmHvNDYv

@RealChrisLangan - Chris Langan

Trailer: Chris Langan - The Interview THEY Didn't Want You To See Trailer: https://youtu.be/11-ckSz6FrQ?si=kh3yZKONrEeU9ZvA Full Interview: https://youtu.be/9miVG2xT5jY https://t.co/K8Ov4lPVKK

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/dRhcekempO

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/h7HyOI7gPy

@iamyesyouareno - iamyesyouareno

Mainstream media: “The Great Replacement is a racist conspiracy theory!” Meanwhile, the mainstream media: https://t.co/lV9jjoitkb

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/SksoFNXMNU

@KeenanPeachy - Peachy Keenan

The Great Replacement theory is not a theory--it's already happened https://t.co/dkS7ZyApDx

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/KXwNEoNYxi

@TPV_John - The Patriot Voice

Chuck Schumer wants to give 11 MILLION+ ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS already in the United States a pathway to citizenship. Your Government HATES YOU, and wants to REPLACE YOU. THE GREAT REPLACEMENT represents a true existential THREAT to our nation. https://t.co/goPZhXmsiN

Video Transcript AI Summary
To secure a great future for America, we must embrace immigrants and dreamers. Our primary goal is to support dreamers and provide a path to citizenship for all undocumented individuals in the country.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The only way we're gonna have a great future in America is if we welcome and embrace immigrants, the dreamers, and all of them because our ultimate goal is to help the dreamers but get a path to citizenship for all 11,000,000 or however many undocumented there are here.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/me5ne3T7jO

@IdentitarianSI - Generation Identity

"Modernity, it's Replacism" The great philosopher Renaud Camus says: "Contrary to what is often said, the Great Replacement is not a theory, it is a constant. I think the act of replacement is a fundamental gesture of modern societies, (1)... https://t.co/LPLrekJULv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Le grand remplacement n'est pas une théorie, mais un constat. Les sociétés contemporaines sont en train de remplacer des éléments fondamentaux, ce qui les conduit à vivre dans le mensonge. Par exemple, remplacer le marbre par du plastique, comme à Las Vegas, illustre cette tendance à substituer l'authenticité par des matériaux artificiels. Cette contamination s'étend jusqu'aux peuples et aux hommes, entraînant un remplacement à grande échelle. --- The great replacement is not a theory, but an observation. Contemporary societies are replacing fundamental elements, leading them to live in falsehood. For instance, replacing marble with plastic, as seen in Las Vegas, illustrates this trend of substituting authenticity with artificial materials. This contamination extends to peoples and individuals, resulting in large-scale replacement.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Contrairement à ce qui est beaucoup dit, le grand remplacement n'est en rien une théorie, c'est un constat. Je pense que l'acte est de remplacer et le geste fondamental des sociétés contemporaines, c'est-à-dire par voie de conséquence qu'elles sont vouées aux mensonges parce qu'évidemment le fait qu'on remplace tout le marbre par la pierre Venise par Venise à Las Vegas que tout soit tibité et faux et tout par le plastique enfin la matière reine du remplacisme global c'est évidemment la matière plastique qui souille jusqu'au fond des océans Et finalement par contagion on finit par remplacer les peuples et les hommes.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/0ErCPmB5xV

@tpvsean - TPV Sean

🚨 WEF Memo Reveals Plan To Depopulate the World of 1 Billion White People by 2030 The World Economic Forum in Davos has ordered global authorities to radically reduce the number of white people in the world by 2030. If you thought the Great Replacement was nothing more than a conspiracy theory, you might want to think again. According to a WEF report, white people are responsible for the vast majority of the world’s problems including climate change and colonialism, and in the interests of an equitable future for the globe, the number of white people must be reduced as a priority. The WEF has enlisted the United Nations to help with the plan and the results are already playing out before our eyes.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The World Economic Forum has allegedly called for a significant reduction in the white population by 2030, claiming that white people are largely responsible for global issues like climate change. Reports indicate that cities in the Netherlands, London, and Brussels are seeing a majority of migrants, suggesting a demographic shift. A CDC official controversially stated that eliminating white vaccine refusers could create a more compliant society. There are claims that COVID-19 and vaccines may disproportionately affect white populations, with discussions around the development of ethnically targeted bioweapons. The narrative suggests a coordinated effort by global elites to reshape demographics and control populations, prompting calls for awareness and action against these perceived threats.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The World Economic Forum in Davos has ordered global authorities to radically reduce the number of white people in the world by 2030. If you thought the great replacement was nothing more than a conspiracy theory, you might want to think again. According to a WF report, white people are responsible for the vast majority of the world's problems, including climate change and colonialism. And in the interest of an equitable future for the globe, the number of white people must be reduced as a priority. The WF has enlisted the United Nations to help with the plan, and the results are already playing out before our very eyes. Before we dive in, subscribe to the channel if you haven't already, and join the People's Voice locals community to join our incredible community and support the channel. The Netherlands has become one of the global elites' testing grounds for the most extreme policies. Just as the Netherlands was ground 0 for the elite's war on farmers, Dutch cities are also operating as laboratories for the elites' plans to depopulate the world and radically alter demographics. Eva Vlardinge Brock reports from the Netherlands. Speaker 1: Amsterdam currently consists of 56% migrants. The Hague, 58% migrants. Rotterdam, almost 60% migrants. And, of course, most of these immigrants come from non Christian, non Western, African, and Middle Eastern countries. Conclusion, the Dutch population is already outnumbered in the majority of our cities. But that looks let's look onwards. London, 54% migrants. Again, conclusion, native population outnumbered. Brussels, color me shocked, 70% migrants. Conclusion, native population majorly outnumbered. And other Europeans will of course follow suit soon if they haven't already. So I'm going to draw the forbidden conclusion here. The great replacement theory is no longer a theory. It's reality. And what's interesting about replacement is that the establishment will either deny its existence or when they admit to it, they say that it's a good thing that the native European is soon no longer a majority on its own continent. Dutch national disgrace and dubbed climate pope, humanity's destiny and that Europe will be diverse. And, of course, by now, I think we all know what they mean with the words diversity. It means less white people, less of you. Imagine this in an Asian or an African country. Imagine their leaders rejoicing in the fact that their people will soon no longer be a majority in their own country. Absolutely unthinkable. Unimaginable. Speaker 0: What is wrong with our leaders? They are fully bought and paid for by compromised reprobates who have hitched their wagon to the globalist agenda and take their orders directly from Davos. Catching the elites in mask off moments is nothing short of terrifying. Take, for example, footage of a top CDC official saying that the elites must get rid of all the whites in the United States and replace them with immigrants to create a more compliant society. Doctor Carol Baker was describing what she described as the solution at a panel discussion in New York City. Speaker 2: The solution. Every study published in the last 5 years, when you look at vaccine refusers, I'm not talking about, well, hesitance. Most of them, we can talk into coming to terms, but refusers. We'll just get rid of all the whites in the United States. Speaker 0: You won't be surprised to hear that Baker was appointed chair of the CDC's advisory committee on immunization by Barack Obama's health and human services secretary in 2009. She was also honored with the 2019 Albert b Sabin Gold Medal at a DC ceremony sponsored by Pfizer and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Is anyone surprised that a Bill Gates connected CDC official is openly suggesting depopulating America of white people who don't cooperate with the elite's vaccine agenda? This is the same Bill Gates who told world leaders that it's time to talk about death panels that will sentence ordinary law abiding people to death for the crime of being no use to the elites. Speaker 3: You know, is spending $1,000,000 on that last 3 months of life for that patient, would it be better not to lay off the those 10 teachers and to make that trade up in medical costs? But that's called the death panel, and you're not supposed to have that discussion. So you of course What Speaker 4: is it interesting than you just said? Would you just the last 3 months in life for 1 person or something because we haven't had a discussion of how to allocate that money, it means we lay off 3 teachers to do so. Speaker 3: I mean, in other words, we Speaker 4: haven't had this type of allocation. Speaker 3: We're making that trade off because of huge medical costs that are not examined to see which ones actually have no benefit whatsoever. Speaker 4: Wait. Speaker 3: Wait. And because of pension generosity, we will be laying off over a 100,000 teachers, which, you know, I'm very much against that. And the whole AFP will agree with me on that. Speaker 0: This is the psychopathic world Bill Gates and his associates of the WF are determined to usher in as part of their great reset and great replacements. But it gets even worse when you understand how far and why their evil ideology has spread. Today's sponsor is pillsforever.com. If you think big pharma have your best interests at heart, think again. Under Biden, the price of medicine in America has skyrocketed, and there are certain medicines big pharma don't want you to know about. That's why I've partnered with pillsforever.com. All of their FDA approved medicines are the cheapest you'll find anywhere. More importantly, you can order medicines that big pharma don't want you to have such as Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and fenbendazole. Speaking of fenbendazole, not only does it get rid of parasites that live inside your body, there have been studies that show fenbendazole can help with cancer. Listen to this testimony of Joe Tippens, a cancer survivor thanks to fenbendazole. Speaker 5: 2 years ago, Joe Tippens says he was told to go home, call hospice, and say his goodbyes. The doctors were unanimous. He was going to die of small cell lung cancer. Speaker 6: Once that kind of cancer goes that far afield, the odds of survival are less than 1% and the median life expectancy is 3 months. Speaker 5: Tippen says he got a tip, not from a pharmacist, but a veterinarian. And in his desperation, he turned from people medicine to dog medicine, specifically fimbendazole. Speaker 6: My insurance company spent $1,200,000 on me with traditional means before I switched to a $5 a week medicine that actually saved me. Speaker 0: Get 15% off using coupon code PeoplesVoice at the checkout. Please click the link below this video or call 256-664-4170 to take advantage of this fantastic offer. The globalist elites are no longer hiding their plans to depopulate the world by reducing the number of white people. This is a multipronged attack, and we are now seeing what it looks like in real time. Of course, the mainstream media is still operating under instructions from the elite to attack anybody who dares to express what they can see with their own two eyes. They'll attack you, shout you down, and pressure your employer to fire you. You might even lose your bank account. You are simply not allowed to talk about the human tragedy of Biden and Harris's open border. Even though Biden is on record laying out his great replacement vision in 2015 in plain English for everybody to understand. Speaker 7: An unrelenting stream of immigration, nonstop, nonstop. Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent, for the first time in 2017, will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America. Absolute minority. Fewer than 50% of the people in America from then and on will be white European stock. That's not a bad thing. That's a that's a source of our strength. An unrelenting stream of immigration, nonstop, nonstop. Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent, for the first time in 2017, will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America. Absolute minority. Fewer than 50% of the people in America from then and on will be white European stock. That's not a bad thing. That's a that's a source of our strength. Speaker 0: Biden is a compromised puppet politician who's been shamelessly selling out America to the globalist for decades. Now that he's been sacrificed by the global elites in favor of Kamala Harris and appears to have been replaced by a body double who's approximately 8 inches taller than the latest version, it's worth pointing out that the elite think we are incredibly stupid. They really think that we're not paying attention to the mountains of evidence proving the multipronged attacks may mean killing the population all have one thing in common. Chem trials and mRNA disproportionately target white people in a way that's statistically impossible unless it's by design. Of course, the plot to depopulate the world has been planned out in detail. The COVID vaccines have long been exposed as a bioweapon designed to cull the herd and depopulate the world. But it gets even worse. As Robert f Kennedy junior explained in New York City, the bioweapon is targeted to take out white people and spare other races. Speaker 8: And we need to talk about bioweapons. Well, I know a lot now about bioweapons because I've been doing a book out for the past two and a half years and, and you know, what we the technology that we now have to develop these microbes. We have we've put 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars into, ethnically targeted microbes. The Chinese have done the same thing. In fact, COVID 19, there's an argument that it is ethnically targeted. COVID 19 attacks certain races, disproportionately. The the the the the races that are most immune to COVID nineteen are because of the of the structure of the, the genetic structure of of of genetic differentials among different races of the of the receptors of the h two receptor. COVID 19 is targeted to attack, clichesians and and, and, black people. The people who are most immune are Askingos Jews and, and Chinese. And but at night, we don't know whether it was deliberately targeted at or not, but there are papers out there that show the, you know, the, the racial and ethnic differential and the impact to that. We do know that the Chinese are spending 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars developing plastic bioweapons, and we are developing ethnic bioweapons. That's where all those labs in the Ukraine are about. They're they're collecting Russian DNA. They're collecting Chinese DNA. Mhmm. So we can target people by race. Speaker 0: We can't allow the evil logic of ethnic bioweapons to become the new normal. Here at the People's Voice, we are determined to expose the agenda of the globalist elites, but we need your help. Subscribe to the channel and share this video with anyone who needs the information. And join the People's Voice locals community to support the channel and gain access to the community. I hope to see you there. Today's video is brought to you by ipv6ers. Are you a content creator who wants to publish information online without big brother spying and censoring your every move? I p v sixes is set to revolutionize the way information is disseminated on the Internet by eliminating the need for big tech companies to provide unreliable, overpriced services such as self hosting, email, and data management. I p v sixes enables an easy and accessible way for you to host your own web and email server with direct end to end connections and enhanced security. This means no snooping for Big Brother and no interference from the technocratic elite. If Hillary Clinton can get away with running her own server, why shouldn't you? Go to the peoplesvoice.tvforward/ipv6 to sign up or click the link below this video to take back control of the Internet and win the info wars against the globalists. If you like our content, help support our sponsor, ipv6ers, and go to the peoples of voice dot tvforward/ipv6 today. Thank you, I p v sixers, for making this video possible.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/FKX4DAXY8R

@KnightsTempOrg - Knights Templar International

Remember, the 'Great Replacement' is just a conspiracy theory... https://t.co/EKFupTuvll

Video Transcript AI Summary
The echoes of replacement theory and racially motivated views are becoming more prominent. In the near future, the U.S. will see a demographic shift where white people will no longer be the majority. By 2044, everyone will be a minority, reflecting a significant change in the country's makeup. The white population is declining, while multiracial Americans are increasing. This transformation is particularly evident in states like Texas, where growth is primarily driven by nonwhite populations, especially Hispanic and Latino communities. This demographic evolution is viewed as a positive development, showcasing America's diversity and its political implications. Those who exploit these changes for profit or political gain are seen as responsible for the resulting tensions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It seems harder and harder to ignore that the echoes of replacement theory and other racially motivated views are increasingly coming out into the open. Speaker 1: In a few years, we're gonna be a majority brown country. White people will not be the majority in the country anymore. Speaker 2: This will be the 1st generation ever in American history, in which whites will be a minority of the generation at some point. Speaker 3: As of 2007, every year, babies being born in this country, whites now with a minority. Speaker 4: In 2044, everyone is gonna be a minority. Speaker 3: As the demographics change, as white people become the minority in the country, which is coming. Demographics is destiny. Demographics is destiny. Speaker 0: Demographics is destiny. Right? The country is changing. Speaker 3: I've been saying it here. Other people have been saying it here for years now, even before Donald Trump. The demographics is destiny. Speaker 1: The white population is declining for the first time history in America, while the number of multiracial Americans have more than doubled. Speaker 4: So we live in a country where the demographics are changing. It's becoming less white. Correct. Okay. Speaker 0: You'll be announcing that we're calling the 38 electoral votes of Texas for the Democratic nominee for president. It's changing. It's gonna become a purple state and then a blue state because of the demographics, because of the population growth. Speaker 3: The growth in Texas has been almost entirely driven by nonwhite population growth, mostly by Hispanic and Latino population growth. Speaker 4: The idea that, you know, whites will will not be the majority, I mean, that's it's an exciting transformation of the country. It's an exciting evolution and, you know, progress of our country in many different ways. Speaker 5: The white population is declining. It it was always on the upswing. So that speaks to the beautiful diversity of America. It speaks to, how the that population will the demographics will weigh in politically. Speaker 6: I believe anybody who act as a replacement is to blame, not for this particular crime, but it's it's for no purpose. No purpose except profit and or political benefit, and it's wrong. It's just simply wrong.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/ZUseulmJLA

@ZoomerHistorian - Zoomer

The Great Replacement is undeniable. Our options are Remigration or death. https://t.co/BqGlYMrcPz

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/lWXYmlKHIQ

@DivineEuropa - ᴅɪᴠɪɴᴇ ᴇᴜʀᴏᴘᴀ

https://t.co/E0KekNCZOl

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/o3KDn92h0y

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

What is the counter argument to this. Is there one? https://t.co/eSOevMg1Jt

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are at risk of losing our identity due to a lack of diversity. People like you bring change, and that’s why many come here. As more individuals arrive, they will transform the country my ancestors established. It’s natural for me to express concern about this shift.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Were about to choke to death on their own homogeneity when people like yourself kindly arrived diverse and saved us from ourselves. No. We built a wonderful country that your ancestors could not have been. That is why people like you come here. And the more you come in larger numbers, you will change the country my ancestors built into something else, and it is completely normal for me to wish to approach this.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/P5Ft8yXbTZ

@redicetv - Red Ice TV ⨁

Why White People Aren't Having Kids It's no surprise that birth rates are low among White Europeans considering these factors.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Third world populations are growing while European birth rates decline. Several factors contribute to this trend. 1. Feminism has led many women to prioritize careers over family. 2. Climate change propaganda discourages having children. 3. Globalist messages promote a child-free lifestyle. 4. Wealth often correlates with fewer children. 5. Economic concerns are cited as reasons for not having kids. 6. White guilt affects family planning decisions. 7. Societal pressures discourage early marriage and childbearing. 8. Governments often do not incentivize higher birth rates among their populations. 9. Multiculturalism and immigration create less cohesive societies. 10. A decline in religious values impacts fertility rates. These factors contribute to low birth rates among white populations, which some argue is a result of deliberate societal changes. However, there is hope for a resurgence in family growth if attitudes shift.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 3rd world populations are exploding, but European people aren't having kids. Well, not like 3rd world and non white populations. Our people are not even replacing themselves with mini mes. While certain groups openly rejoice in white people declining and think their group is genetically superior and that white people are somehow broken because they don't have 8 kids, the root cause is far more complex, but also very obvious. Reasons why white people aren't having kids. Number 1, feminism. So called liberated women have chosen to prioritize school and a career over a family, and even the women that try to do both don't have many kids, and if they do, they're usually stressed out. 2, climate change propaganda. For years, fake environmentalists blasted messages telling us that it's immoral to have more than one child. They still do even though we aren't even replacing ourselves. And in fact, you should do your part to save the planet by not having any kids at all. All. This message, as seen on countless magazine covers and articles, always features white babies in the image, yet they don't discourage large families among non Europeans in the west or the third world populations, no. It's immoral to not let them have a big family living it up in the western world with lots of stuff. Speaker 1: Greece is good, but Greece is not give me home and no have food. I stay here. Like, one one here, I stay here. And no give me home, no nothing here. I want to go, another country. Speaker 2: My opinion, Eric Flint of the Syrians will stay here in Sweden. When I was in Syria, actually, I had just a Nokia, like a cheap phone. But now I have an iPhone. But now I have an iPhone. Speaker 0: Here we have like money, job, school. 3. Progressive globalist propaganda has been constantly programming the child free life to white women. You see it on magazine covers and TV shows constantly. Kids are misery and they hold you down. The child free life is freedom and a constant party. Sex and the city is Speaker 3: where it's at. Yeah. Just wait until these Speaker 0: women are old and alone. The birth rate in the United are old and alone. Speaker 4: The birth rate in the United States has been in free fall for years, recently hitting the lowest level ever in American history. That means now about one out of every 5 women in their early forties chooses not to have Speaker 3: a child. Speaker 4: In more and more cases, it's because women are choosing not to have children because their careers or their lifestyles or because they just don't want to. And the trend is now the focus of the latest issue of Time Magazine. You see the headline here, the child free life. I'm gonna start with Radhika because you have chosen not to have children as I have. When I think back through my life, and and I never wanted to have children even when I was a child. So I think, well, why would I wanna have children? Like, oh, so they can take care of me in my old age, but that's selfish to me. Speaker 0: 4. This one just doesn't make sense to me, but it's true for many people. The west has become wealthy and comfortable. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Give me a cup. Cut me a piece. Oh, you're good. Go away, Biden. Speaker 0: Generally, wealthy people have less kids. They should be having at least 5 as they could easily afford it. Instead, an abundance of materialism usually makes them have fewer children. 5. On the other hand, I hear white people tell me, it's too expensive. They can't afford it. This one, I hate hearing. If you're struggling pioneering ancestors said this, you wouldn't be alive. Yes. I know non Europeans come to our nations, easily claim victim status, get welfare, and have 4 kids. And I know it's much harder for us to get help, but you can make it happen. You don't have to buy all the stuff you think you do. Chances are that you spend that money elsewhere already. Poor white people have always had many kids and this was before welfare. 6, the most important and damaging reason of all, white guilt. We are being programmed to hate ourselves, hate our ancestors, and feel shame for being who we are. We're told all white people are racist and that mythical white privilege and white supremacy is holding back world peace. All of these are disgusting, hateful lies, but they have done damage in the psyche of white people, starting from a young age. We've been blasted with messages like this. White nuclear families uphold white supremacy. Wanting to preserve your heritage and have children that look like you is racism and world war. So we should welcome and celebrate white people dying out. Celebrate our extinction from the face of the earth. Speaker 5: Whites will will not be the majority. Speaker 6: Whiteness is a form of racial oppression. Speaker 7: New Sweden emerging. The immigration process Speaker 8: coming to Europe is irreversible. Speaker 5: It's an exciting transformation of the country. An unrelenting stream of immigration, nonstop. Nonstop. Speaker 6: There can be no white race without the phenomenon of white supremacy. Speaker 7: Sweden is destined to become a multiracial, multicultural society. Speaker 5: And the wave still continues. It's not gonna stop, nor should we want it to stop. Speaker 6: Reason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity. Speaker 9: At this point in time, Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. Speaker 5: Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent, for the first time in 2017, will be in an absolute minority. Speaker 6: The task is to bring this minority together in such a way that it makes it impossible for the legacy of whiteness to continue to reproduce itself. Speaker 5: Absolute minority. Fewer than 50% of the people in America from then and on will be white European stock. Speaker 6: My concern is, is doing away with whiteness. Speaker 5: That's not a bad thing. That's a that's a source of our strength. Speaker 9: And I think we're gonna be part of the throes of that of that transformation, which must take place. Speaker 5: It's one of the things I think we can be most proud of. Speaker 9: Europe is not gonna be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Speaker 0: Not exactly an ideal condition for bringing up white children, is it? 7, more globalist lies such as western civilization wasn't created by Europeans, not by white people. Race doesn't exist. It's all a social construct. So open the borders and welcome your replacements, the new Europeans. Once you're a minority in your nation, nothing will Speaker 3: change because people are all the same. Everything will go on as usual. No. In fact, it will be even Speaker 0: better. No. In fact, it Speaker 3: will be even better Speaker 0: if there are less of you. Not exactly a healthy environment that inspires Speaker 3: and encourages white people to Speaker 0: have a family. Is it? 8. Most parents aren't encouraging their daughters to get married and start a family in their twenties. They don't even motivate why this is important and how it will make them fulfilled. If they do want their kids to have kids, they usually say, well, wait until after school. It should be the other way around. 9, our European governments are also not encouraging white people, their own nation, their own population to have more children. Speaker 1: Stupid. Speaker 0: With the exception of Hungary, Russia, Poland, Denmark, places like Germany definitely don't. In fact, they say it's good their own people disappear because, you know, the Nazis. But then say, we need these 3rd world populations of rocket scientists to take care of you when you're old. Don't incentivize having children among your own people, but instead, bring in completely foreign and needy people from elsewhere because that's gonna work out great. 10, the future isn't white. We're constantly told that this is inevitable, like a bad voodoo mind trick, that white people are going to die out. So just embrace it and rejoice. It's for the best that people like you don't exist. This is not going to be the country of white people. And you can speed that along by having kids who don't look like you. Forget the environment and all that now because no white people means cleaner air. Mixed race populations in the west are going to save it. Again, incredibly hateful. 11, multiculturalism, diversity, and immigration. Our societies are less cohesive, less safe, and the hostility against white people is through the roof. This doesn't make white people wanna have big families, but in reality, it should give them every reason to have one. 12. I'm going to add religion in this list. European people are less Christian and definitely less pagan, and this factors into fertility rates. It's why Muslims and Catholic Hispanics are having the biggest families in the west, with the exception of some European Catholics, Amish, and Mormons. 13. I know this rings true for many white couples who wish to have more kids. We've lost our village, our tribe, and our large extended families. We've become isolated and lost a folk community to count on, to help each other out, to back each other up. Once that changes, so will birth rates. The fact is several of these things that I mentioned fall under the UN's definition of genocide. Don't believe me? Let's take a look. In the present convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy in whole or in part a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group as such, causing serious mental harm to members of the group. Yes. Definitely happening and some physical, which people deny. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part. Yes. Happening. Measures intended to prevent births within the group. Yes. Happening. So it's no surprise considering these factors that white birth rates are low. Duh. It's not organic, but done by design. White people have lost their confidence and loyalty as a group. White globalists have made their own people enemy number 1. They've become cannibals infected by a parasite, and they are completely blind to the hardship they are creating for our children. But, of course, the most important thing, a lot of you watching are having many children, and all of this can be very temporary. It's up to you. Numbers will change. Don't let anybody lie and say it's not possible. Populations ebb and flow, decline, and can make a major comeback. That rise, that comeback is in our future, so get on it. Thank you, Red Ice members, for backing this video. We continue because of your support. There are groups who spend all their time and resources trying to silence people like us, so we need your continued support, especially now. Much love. Talk soon.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/w6d5CUUuub

@1776General_ - The General

@SaltyGirl09 Demographics of the USA. https://t.co/AnD64pRjVH

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/fAa9XoIBCW

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵THREAD🧵 Post 1 of 13 Approximately 100 min ▪️THE KALERGI PLAN▪️ ▪️THE IMMIGRATION AGENDA▪️ ▪️THE EUROPEAN MIGRANT CRISIS▪️ ▪️US 🇺🇸 MIGRANT CRISIS▪️ ▪️WHITE ËTHNIC CLEANSING▪️ ▪️ANTI WHITENESS▪️ (For Educational Purposes Only) Chances are that most of you have not heard of THE KALERGI PLAN…. ▪️What is the KALERGI PLAN? ▪️Who is responsible for the Mass Immigration Agenda? ▪️Why is the Mass Immigration Agenda being pushed so hard? ▪️Why is there so much Anti White Hate? Is it a debunked conspiracy?Decide for yourself…Open you Mind 🧠 SCROLL for Post 2👇🏽

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/fmBA3zcXb3

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If there really was a Jewish ✡️ plot to eliminate white people, they would use their control of the media to normalize replacement….. 🧵 1/21 https://t.co/GbXWBhWFQa

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/pwGuM9M0ED

@conscious_aryan - Pride_of_the_people

It’s been planned and written. In their own words. And they will not stop until either we are dead, or we stop them. There is no in-between. https://t.co/6TN85PK0rA

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/uAUmGuXjXG

@conscious_aryan - Pride_of_the_people

https://t.co/QBNfNWwJGr

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/kczASlFHDV

@AFpost - AF Post

Legal migration to wealthy, White countries hit record high in 2023. Follow: @AFpost https://t.co/LDDnrWzJG1

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/RRJjBBf37x

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/OU6YNwYgQM

@SirOswaldGhost - Sir Oswald Ghost

I asked Grok: 'If you were Satan, and you wanted to eradicate the White race, how would you do it without them noticing it happening?' This was its response Thread:🧵

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/KFzizr40v4

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker-ucas Gage🇺🇲

🇺🇸📺 INTRODUCING "THE GREÅT REPLÅCEMENT" At tonight's #GOPDebate, Vivek said "The Gréat Réplacement" of White people is Democrat policy. But what is it? Our very own @KeithWoodsYT & Chris Langan--the man with the world's highest IQ--discuss what means, how the media reinforces it & where/when it originated.🔊

Video Transcript AI Summary
The great replacement issue threatens to dilute the majority populations in North America, Europe, and Australia. This could lead to a loss of individualism and creativity associated with these populations, resulting in a homogeneous society controlled by a master race of elite bankers and nobility. The agenda has been ongoing since the early 20th century, with immigration policies designed to mix populations. Additionally, there is a demographic trend where lower IQ populations are having more children, while higher IQ individuals struggle to start families due to economic barriers. This situation is seen as a deliberate attempt to damage the genetic quality of the majority population, leading to a future where diversity is homogenized and dissent is minimized.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You mentioned the great replacement as an issue. I mean, how grave do you see this issue? What do you think the consequences, the long term consequences of the great replacement are? Speaker 1: Well, I think the long term consequences are the having the majority populations of North America and Europe and Australia and New Zealand diluted out of existence. I think basically, if you're going to take you know, 7,000,000,000 people, only, you know, 3 or 400,000,000,000 of which are white and mix them all together, you know, and the nonwhite ones breed a lot faster than the white ones do, pretty soon you're not going to have anything resembling a white person anymore. Now what happens then? Well, that individualism and that that particular creative kind of abstraction that that whites tend to excel in, that disappears. And then what you've got is a homogeneous sort of, well, what it is is it's an ideal slavery. It's for people who have mastered the techniques of control. Okay? And so we've got this these techniques of control and all kinds of surveillance and coercion technology and, you know, political science has gotten to be, you know, nothing but but a a a demonic scam more or less where people are being fooled. You know, consent is being manufactured. You know, that's that's where we're headed. You know, it's basically this was written about, by the way, by Richard and Kudinbuch Kalogi who came up with something called the Kalogi program, wrote a book called Practical Idealism that was funded by, I believe it was the Warburgs and Rothschilds, you know, back in 1925. And it had been going on before that. I mean, it goes way to hell back to the earliest, you know, roots of Zionism and communism. But that book was written in 1925 with funding from these central bankers. And, it advocates basically for what it is now EU immigration policy and what after it became EU immigration policy, which is namely shipping in all the nonwhites, it became North American immigration policy as well. So that's what we're faced with now. Basically, the activation of the Calergi program and basically dilute our genome out of existence. And basically dilute our genome out of existence in a kind of a vast mocha colored what did Clergy call it? The Eurasian Negroid race of the future. And by the Speaker 0: way Big business big business sorry. Go ahead. Speaker 1: Yeah. He had basically, clarity spoke of 2 races. This Eurasian, Negroid race of the future, kind of mongrelized, mocha colored hodgepodge. And then you've got, you know, the what the master race. It wasn't Hitler who came up with that terminology. That was that was polarity. Okay? The master race. And, of course, the master race was to consist of whom? It was to consist of Zionist bankers and the European nobility who were their most lucrative clients. And it's as simple as that. That's what they wanted. A master race, right, downbreeding everybody else into a kind of slave race. And that's what it's been about since that thought. Ever since then, the the history of the world has conformed to this program, to this agenda in every way, and people still aren't breaking up. There's no continuity. I mean, you know, basically, the the book was taken off the shelves in Germany. You know, and now, you know, people deny it exists. Oh, it's a big conspiracy theory. Nonsense. This agenda has been pushed and pushed hard for a long time, and it is in full swing. The EU, the European Union would not exist without it? Speaker 0: Yes. It seems like the brakes are off now. There was a time where this was denied in most Western countries. We were told it was a small trickle of immigration. It was just the workforce. And now they they ramp it up. You know, they you don't see white people in in TV shows. You don't see white people in movies. You have old Shakespeare plays with black casts. You have advertising that's that's just constantly pushing. Speaker 1: My wife and I were watching TV that we we have an Internet service. And we were trying to watch a movie, but it was on one of these service, I think IMDB, that has commercials that come across. And there was a string of 5 commercials, each one of them with almost nothing but black people in it. I mean, what the hell do you call that? Yeah. You know what I mean? What is that about? I mean, they're trying to sell products one would think to the majority citizens of the nation in which the show is being televised. And yet here, every single commercial features nonwhites. What is that about? Well, obviously, we're being conditioned. We're being demoralized. They want us to be dissatisfied with being white. And the irony is that if this agenda continues, pretty soon, there's gonna be no more diversity. Diversity will be completely homogenized out of existence. Everybody will look the same. They'll have the same mocha colored skin tone, the same attitudes, the same cultural values. Everything is going to be just totally broken down so that nobody opposes their leaders, which is this Calergan master race of which I spoke. Speaker 0: Now you mentioned I mean another factor is yet decline in IQ and I mean you can just look at demographic studies and basically the people that are having the most kids now are the lower IQ population. Also the high IQ population has more kids. Basically the people in the middle are kind of there's a collapse there. But again, the the lower section of that is is having far more kids Speaker 1: than Well, well, no. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And you also got to to cut off the highest section of IQ. The people with the highest IQs are not breeding at all. Okay? The the those people, you know, some some of them a few of them, especially the ones that are lower down and more materialistic, devote themselves to their careers. But, you know, people like me, for example, I was completely stopped from being able to afford a family when I was, you know, at the age when I wanted to. And I actually was trying to get a job and and accumulate enough money. Cost of living was high where I was living, which was was in New York. But, actually, you know, I made an effort to, you know, settle down, get a steady paying job so that I could raise a family. I could not do it. Why couldn't I do it? Because the civil service, which was basically the only the only thing where I could, you know, hope to be high. You go and you take the test. If you're a white person, you can score a 100 on the civil service exam or at the time could score a 100 on the civil service exam in New York and be beaten by any nonwhite with a score of 70. Well They're spotted 30% on the same test. So you end up with, you know, 3, 4000 nonwhite people in front of you for any civil service job at the time. So there was just I saw there was no way to do it. So, yeah, this stopped people like me from breathing. I mean, I didn't have any connections, didn't have any money. Someone in my position is completely it doesn't make any difference what the genetic quality is. They don't care. They'll cut you off. Okay? And meanwhile, you know, these people that were getting the jobs, you know, the non whites who were getting the jobs I was in a post office one time. It was in Spionc, New York. Okay. Standing in the post office, there was a guy in there. He was a black guy and he was saying hi to somebody else he knew. And, you know, the guy said, you know, hey. You know, how are the kids doing? Because, you know, I got a lot of kids. And the guy says, yeah. Just exactly how many kids do you have? They said, by my count, about 40. Okay. You basically had this guy who was black guy was bragging about having and he was by no, you know, no great shirts intellectual. I mean, you could tell. I had an estimate. It's like he was maybe 75 bragging about having 40 kids with a wide assortment of women. And the guy said, jeez, you gotta be stupid to have that many kids. He says, oh, no. The government pays us to. Those words came out of his mouth. The government pays us to. And that's true. That's absolutely true. So you've got these low IQ people that are being paid to breed and not just breed a little but breed a lot. And then you've got people like me who are totally x ed out of the economy so that we can't afford to raise a family. This is not just accident. This is this is this is, you know, it's basically dysgenic. Somebody is trying to damage our genome, and they're doing a very, very good job.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/O4PHKiJWfo

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

🇺🇲 Wow! Vivek Ramaswamy just stated the Great Replacement is NOT a conspiracy theory, but government policy. Time to mainstream this discussion across the West. #GOPDebate https://t.co/KSQmByREAM

Video Transcript AI Summary
The great replacement theory is presented not as a conspiracy but as a fundamental aspect of the Democratic Party's platform. The discussion also touches on the implications of the 2020 election.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 11, that the great replacement theory is not some grand right wing conspiracy theory, but a basic statement of the Democratic party's platform. Let's That the 2020 election was

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/wijtGbWIaX

@DurhamWASP - Mark W.

“To speak of ‘immigration’ is already to be an accomplice of colonization and genocide. There is NO immigration. What there is is a migratory invasion, an organized colonization, a change of people and civilization, a Great Replacement, a genocide under human mass.” Renaud Camus https://t.co/kJftuuuLX4

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/ykGVemeclr

@herbthefox1 - Herbthefox

@VoxExVeritas The Kalergi plan. “The man of the future will be mixed race — the Euroasian-Negroid — with a small group of communist spiritual aristocrats to govern” https://t.co/x4btmNoWgp

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/7lrbQ60EdR

@Darksol33 - Darksol 🇨🇦

@ivankatrumpio @VoxExVeritas @BGatesIsaPyscho Communists created The Melting Pot in 1908, also known as the Kalergi plan 1920s, Cloward-Piven strategy 1930s & replacement migration 2000s UN. The rule of demographic war states when an ethnostate replaces 20-30% of their local populace it will collapse. https://t.co/0MR1qJcfvC

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/rl09J833NH

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/OGLdvwS7rH

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

@elonmusk Not just to America, but to virtually every Western country. Just read the UN's 'Replacement Migration' document, published in March 2000. 👇 https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf https://t.co/J5uVWAYrcY

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/Vm9lBuIURS

@corza1r - ₵ØⱤⱫ₳ ⱤɄ₵₭ɄŞ

Rabbi David Bar-Hayim: Admits Jewish NGO’s Are Behind Forced Immigration Into European Nation. The Eurasian-Negroid Race Of The Future Will Replace The Diversity Of Peoples. The Jews Shall Take The Leading Positions, Since Providence (God) Has Given Europe A Spiritually Superior Race Of Nobility Called, The Jews. Coudenhove-Kalergi From Praktischer Idealismus, 1925

Video Transcript AI Summary
A decision by Gough Whitlam has contributed to a growing crisis in Europe, where many feel threatened by uncontrolled immigration from the developing world. This has led to a perception among some Europeans and Americans that politicians are betraying their nations by allowing this influx. Some individuals blame Jews for promoting these immigration policies, viewing it as a conspiracy to undermine white European societies. They argue that this is a form of revenge for historical discrimination against Jews, including pogroms and inquisitions. This sentiment reflects a deep-seated apprehension about cultural preservation and identity in the face of demographic changes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A decision taken by then prime minister, Gough Whitlam. And this has also been the case in North America, for many years now. In Europe, in particular, this has accelerated and become, a truly, enormous, crisis for those who wish to see European nations remain exactly what they are, European nations. That is to say, the homelands and the, societies for European peoples who wish to remain, European, who identify as European, who wish to maintain their cultural heritage, etcetera, they feel threatened. And again, I reiterate, they are correct to feel so. They are absolutely 100% correct, in my view. I think it is a massive crime on the part, I would say, even a treasonous act on the part of, many politicians in the west for allowing and facilitating such, uncontrolled and, massive immigration of, 3rd world, immigrants into into these countries. It is also a massive, historical act of folly. As a result of, this apprehension, many people of European background are looking for for those who are responsible, wish to blame, find the people they can blame, and, attack for what has been going on over, in some cases, for decades, in other cases, more particularly over the last few years. And it is true, unfortunately, and I think this needs to be frankly admitted by Jews all over the world, that there are, without doubt, Jews, Jews, involved in those movements and those, organizations, very often NGOs, etcetera, who promote this phenomenon of 3rd world immigration into into the Western countries. And the conclusion of these Europeans and Americans is that, the Jews are behind this policy, that this is some kind of Jewish conspiracy to water down, white American or white European societies ought to inflict irreparable damage on these societies. In some cases, I've seen claims made by such people that the Jews are doing this deliberately as an act of revenge against, the European nations who who, discriminated against the Jews for, not just for centuries, but actually, one could say for millennia, in response to, pogroms and massacres and inquisitions, etcetera, against the Jewish people throughout history that the Jews are now, taking their event.
VoxExVeritas
Posted - December 4, 2024 at 2:12 AM
Saved - December 5, 2024 at 2:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
This is going to age well. I've shared some more notable insights for those who might have missed them. It's crucial to accurately identify the problem, and it seems there's a lack of community notes around here.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

This is gonna age like wine. https://t.co/rr4bCqtz5c

Video Transcript AI Summary
Our leaders are corrupt, and the entire system, including the FBI, Supreme Court, and media, is broken. This corruption stems from a departure from God and allows harmful influences to infiltrate our nation. There’s a grave concern about the exploitation of children for political gain, with accusations of American politicians being compromised by foreign entities. The situation is dire, and there's a call for accountability and change in America.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And our leaders are low life scum that screw little girls. So, the Jews can screw America. That's what's happening in this country. I just said it. That's what's going on in this country. And our FBI is corrupt. The Supreme Court is corrupt. The Justice Department is corrupt. The news media is corrupt. The whole country is corrupt. Because we walked away from almighty God. And we've allowed Kabbalah practicing Jews to defile the nation. Put that video out. Go ahead and clip this video and send it out. I dare you. You won't do it. Because you're scared that the truth may get out to the American people. I'm headed up to here with the corruption in this country. Little children being raped for the benefit of Israel. It's also about doc. Little American children being raped for the benefit of Israel. American politicians raping little American girls to be videotaped by Israeli Mossad so that Israel can blackmail American politicians. That's the state of America today. God ought to destroy this country for what we've become.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/ypRZz4wys4

@HedgeCapone - U.H.🦔Hedge Capone🔫🇺🇲🤍

@Mackiavelli1933 @VoxExVeritas Here are a few more gems if you don't have them. https://t.co/lPqjhuZocI

Video Transcript AI Summary
A clear sign of control is the presence of entities or individuals that you cannot criticize. In totalitarian regimes like Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, and North Korea, criticism of the ruling party or leader is forbidden. Similarly, in China and Cuba, dissent against the government is not tolerated. In America, the question arises: who is beyond criticism? Some suggest that the Jewish lobby is a group that cannot be openly criticized. This indicates who holds significant influence in the country.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Easy. An easy way to know if you are controlled. Is there somebody or something that you're not allowed to criticize? That's right. Simple as that. If you lived in Nazi Germany, you couldn't criticize the Nazi party. If you lived in the Soviet Union, you couldn't criticize the Communist Party of Russia. If you live in China right now, you can't criticize the Chinese Communist Party. If you live in North Viet in North Korea, you can't criticize Kim Jong Un. If you live in Cuba, you can't criticize the Cuban Communist Party. If you live in America, who can't you criticize? Who? Who can't you criticize in America? The Jewish lobby? Yes. On both sides. Right. That's right. That's that's tells you who controls the country.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The current administration fails to label Antifa as a terrorist organization, despite its violent history since its founding in the 1930s. This organization, originally established by Jews, continues to receive funding from Jewish sources today. The reluctance to officially designate it as a terrorist group stems from the implications of targeting the financial backers, which would involve arresting wealthy individuals within the Jewish community.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Understand why the current administration doesn't step up and call a spade a spade and say Antifa is a I mean, from the beginning, it was a terrorist organization from when it was first founded. That's what it is. Founded by Jews in the 19 thirties? That's exactly right, Rick. That was its purpose. Absolutely. It's a Jewish organization founded in the thirties by by Jews and it's always been a violent organization. It's still funded by Jews today. That's why they don't declare it a terrorist organization. Now you have the answer to your question because you'd have to go after the money. Yes. And when you go after the money, you're going to end up arresting a bunch of rich Jews.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Bibles once held significant family histories, like this 1905 edition, which predates the Scofield Bible that introduced Zionist ideas in 1913. This Bible contains a map labeled "Palestine," contradicting claims that Palestine never existed. Palestinians, encompassing Jewish, Christian, and Muslim communities, lived in Palestine, and Jesus was among them. The narrative of Israel as a political entity is challenged; it represents the people of God. Following the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, there was an influx of European Ashkenazi Jews into Palestine, leading to conflict. Lyndon B. Johnson's involvement in smuggling weapons to these groups is noted. The declaration of Israel in 1948 marked a disaster for Palestinians, who continue to face displacement and violence. The ongoing struggle is characterized by Palestinians resisting eviction from their homes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you, remember when Bibles were like this in homes and in in churches, every church had a Bible like this. You know, every Christian family had a a Bible like this, and they put their their family genealogy, the weddings Baptism. Baptisms and burials. It was all put inside the bible, and you passed it down generation to generation. This particular bible was published in in 1905. Now the reason I brought it out is that I I wanna show a map that's in this bible. Now mind you, the Scofield Bible was not published until 1913. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: And I have in my office an original 19 13 Schofield, which was the introduction of the Zionist masonic heresies about a future state of Israel and separating the church from Israel and all that rapture stuff. That's where it came from. It was a masonic Zionist heresy that was introduced into the American churches in 1913. This is a 1905 bible. Pre Scofield. Pre Scofield with no Scofield notes in it. So you open it up and, this is on page 13. I mean, this thing's big. I wanna show you. Here is here is a map of the holy land, and it says what? Speaker 1: Palestine. Oh, the holy land. They misspelled Israel. No. Palestine. Palestine. And all these Christian Zionists that tell me, Speaker 0: Rick, there's never been a Palestine. Speaker 1: Alright. So here's a still. There it is. That's I'm gonna zoom in and show you here. Speaker 0: Yeah. So yeah. You hear these people like John Hagee. There's never been a Palestine. Well, look at this Bible map from 1905. Speaker 1: And most and and most Bibles Yes. From then had a map of Palestine. Palestine. Speaker 0: And Palestine is in the Bible itself in the Old Testament. So we're showing you this just because I'm trying to break through the propaganda, the confusion, the lies that the Zionists have implanted in millions of minds of Christians in America and told them there's never been a place called Palestine. But I have a map, Rick. Right. There it is. So with that in mind, do you know who lived in Palestine? Speaker 1: Palestinians? Palestinians. I got that one right. Speaker 0: Palestinians. And Palestinians were Jewish, Christian And Muslim. And Muslim. Speaker 1: Right. They they weren't a particular faith. They were citizens of a particular country. Palestine. Palestine. Speaker 0: They were all Palestinians. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Jesus was a Palestinian. Look at this. K? So Israel has never meant a political country. It's always meant the people of God. Yes. The called out Ecclesia, the people of God. That's what Israel means. It's not a political country. With that in mind, we we're gonna show you some of the scenes of the violence that's taking place in Palestine this week because here's what's happened in the 9 following the 1917 Jewish Bolshevik Revolution in Russia where the Jewish Bolsheviks went in and slaughtered the Romanov families in a satanic ritual, imposed communism on Russia, killed 100 of 1000, literally millions, millions of Christians, 100 of thousands of Christian Orthodox pastors and burned their churches and just a horrible attack on the Russian church in 1917 and afterwards, then they began to infiltrate Palestine in the 19 twenties and the thirties. In the 19 thirties, there was a congressman in Texas, Lyndon b Johnson, and he was smuggling guns and rockets and grenades from Texas to Palestine, putting them in the hands of the Jewish Communist terrorists that were infiltrating Palestine. There was no Israel, no state of Israel. It was Palestine. Speaker 1: And they crow about that. That that's not a, you know, conspiracy theory. That's right from the Lyndon b Johnson Library. Speaker 0: The crates the crates were called they were marked Texas grapefruits. The the grenades, they were shipped as Texas grapefruits. Speaker 1: The same grapefruits that blew up the King David Hotel. Speaker 0: So so the 19 twenties, the thirties, and into the forties, the European Ashkenazis invaded Palestine, infiltrated. The Arabs, Christian, Muslim, and Jewish, all Palestinians Mhmm. Were alarmed by the arrival of the Communist Ashkenazis from Europe. The so called Jewish settlers were killing. They killed the Jewish residents of Palestine. Speaker 1: Yes. Do Speaker 0: you understand that? They killed the Jews who lived in Palestine. They killed Christians. They killed Muslims. They finally got enough critical mass that they had enough numbers that they took over Palestine and declared their independence in 1948 and Harry s Truman, a 33rd degree freemason quickly recognized this new country as a real country and that's how we got to 1948 and the state of Israel. There's never been peace in the Middle East since that day. That day is marked by all Palestinians as a day of disaster. Speaker 1: NAPCA. Speaker 0: NAPCA. A day of disaster. The disaster continues to this day. The Ashkenazi's invaders continue to take the land, the homes of the Palestinians who have resisted, refused to leave their houses, refused to leave their farms. It's not about Palestinians trying to chase out Jews. It's Jews who are trying to chase out Palestinians, and to this day since 1948, they're still fighting them, trying to make them leave. Right. And these Palestinians have been

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/oBy4CyFpAx

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

Accurately identify the PROBLEM https://t.co/cphI1K68cD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The German nation seeks to maintain its interests without foreign influence, emphasizing that each nation should be governed by its own people. There is a commitment to educate intelligent children from the working class to take on leadership roles, ensuring that German culture is preserved and managed by Germans. The aim is to counteract forces that threaten national unity and economy, particularly against what is perceived as international Jewish financial dominance. Marxism, whether in social democracy or communism, can be challenged through a more truthful yet equally forceful approach. It is essential to resist impending doom and take proactive measures, which inspired the founding of the National Socialist German Workers' Party.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And accurately identify the problem. In connection with the Jewish question, I have this to say. The German nation does not wish its interest to be determined and controlled by any foreign nation. France to the French, England to the English, America to the Americans, and Germany to the Germans. We are resolved to prevent the settlement in our country of a strange people, which was capable of snatching for itself all the leading positions in the land and to oust it, for it is our will to educate our own nation for these leading positions. We have 100 of 1000 of very intelligent children of peasants and of the working classes. We shall have them educated. In fact, we have already begun. Above all, German culture, as its name alone shows, is German and not Jewish and, therefore, its management and care will be entrusted to members of our own nation. And this goal of theirs consists of breaking up the fatherland, destroying the nation, destroying the national economy, and establishing international Jewish financial hegemony. Marxism, in the form of social democracy or communism, can be defeated as long as it is confronted with the doctrine of greater truthfulness but equal brutality. Now I ask you this, do you believe that a change will occur by chance, or are you convinced that when one sees doom inevitably approaching, it is one's duty, one's right, to rise up against it and to resist with all one's might in order finally to go on the attack oneself. That was exactly what we all had in mind when we founded the National Socialist German Workers' Party.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

That's a 🧵☝🏻

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/9ZVD8oI9N0

@0x_Atreyu - 0xAtreyu

@VoxExVeritas Not a community note in sight.

VoxExVeritas
Posted - December 2, 2024 at 7:03 AM
Saved - December 2, 2024 at 11:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m exploring whether Grok is antisemitic or just not foolish. I noticed some interesting results when comparing Grok and ChatGPT, particularly regarding symbols like the Star of David, which has historical ties to Kabbalah and became a Jewish symbol through Zionism. There seems to be a pattern in how these AI tools respond to prompts about sensitive topics, as they often limit or shut down discussions. I've also tested Microsoft Designer with similar prompts, confirming these trends.

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

So now the question is..is grok antisemitic..or just not fukin retarded? https://t.co/1l7FRvHojG https://t.co/dPk0UJf8Wo

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/hfCMlBhjei

@bbbaconpancakes - Stokes

@VoxExVeritas Interesting. ChatGPT did the same. Look closely on the building. The star is on both sides and also in the light behind the building. Used same prompt as you. https://t.co/Nbuea5cuXm

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/r7fpjCUvCA

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

Well that's odd..https://t.co/b31p7rCB9l https://t.co/BuZ9MojkNM

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

😂 https://t.co/OjaJwYr0IL

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/NDVjYugy5h

@Samuel4Freedom - Sam James

@VoxExVeritas My results. Grok vs ChatGPT! https://t.co/xvyVpvp5QP

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/r2rSoclbaC

@ToanLe0001 - Toan Le

@VoxExVeritas Asked chatgpt to just draw the Synagogue of satan https://t.co/nOQ17B9E0l

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/wCdicpO9Sc

@AsDawnApproach - ❤Ash❤

@TheDeclineWatch @VoxExVeritas Still works, I just generated these https://t.co/75uMc8pAUf

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/lT3t2GOuf5

@BasedandBraver - Based and Brave

@PopulusAlb98772 @VoxExVeritas The Star of David has been depicted by both a pentagram and hexagram. It originated in the Kabbalah and didn’t become an official symbol of Judaism until Zionism. https://t.co/H9UVm3zgaE

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/E4PI3cw0e8

@IcanAmer_MAGA - IcanAmer🇺🇸

@VoxExVeritas 😬😬😬 https://t.co/AszjQYQB2p

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

They're already shutting it down! https://t.co/QNPGtEURz5

@TSKR369 - MAM

@VoxExVeritas When I asked to redo with More details it didn’t want to lol. 😂 It is https://t.co/uHNao4FZGc

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/YfVNVkUZUd

@juansemoss - SΞB-MOSS

@VoxExVeritas Midjourney same prompt. https://t.co/yVFefTcOH1

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

https://t.co/xxSxT2q5c5

@TheirEcho - The Echo

@VoxExVeritas If you think this is because you used the word “synagogue” https://t.co/U8ixt7Fm17

@VoxExVeritas - Vox Veritas

Microsoft Designer version. https://t.co/PXKETImI70

@Classy_86 - 🍁Classy 🍉

@VoxExVeritas can confirm (used microsoft designer) https://t.co/ApPpo3qscM

View Full Interactive Feed