reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @WallStreetApes

WallStreetApes
Posted - June 7, 2026 at 5:51 AM
Saved - June 7, 2026 at 1:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m saying $115 million per hour is lost to fraud—about $1 trillion a year—per the Government Accountability Office. I cite Senator Josh Hawley’s claim the money funds luxury items, terrorism, child trafficking, and drugs. Outdated systems are exploited with stolen identities and synthetic IDs; the chance of getting caught is virtually zero, and it’s highly organized.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is the truth about who benefits from your tax dollars - $115 million dollars PER HOUR is lost to fraud - That’s $1 trillion year, all stolen with fraud This isn’t a conspiracy theory, this is from the Government Accountability Office Senator Josh Hawley says the money is going to luxury items, terrorism, child trafficking and drugs Here’s the thing, they are exploiting our outdated government systems, this is exactly what Elon Musk says needed to be fixed and replaced to stop the fraud “They take advantage of antiquated government systems and processes. They go into programs that they know elected and appointed officials won't touch, and they can steal at scale. They learned a really valuable lesson: government never runs out of money. The probability of getting caught is virtually zero.” Read that again, the probability of getting caught is ZERO Criminal networks use stolen identities, synthetic IDs and scale via outdated technology This is highly organized

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript discusses the idea that money from taxes paid by an everyday electrician is used for luxury purchases and for funding terrorism and child trafficking. It states that “a trillion dollars a year” is spent on “this stuff,” and repeats figures of “a hundred and fifteen million dollars an hour.” It then asks how this money is obtained, raising possibilities such as “trends, national organizations, criminal networks.” The response says they “take advantage of antiquated government systems and processes.” It explains that they “go into programs that they know elected and appointed officials won’t touch,” allowing them to “steal at scale.” The transcript concludes with the lesson that “Government never runs out of money,” and that “the probability of getting caught is virtually zero.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
You're telling me that the electrician who goes to work every day and clocks in and works his butt off and tries to earn just enough to be able to, you know, make his rent, maybe have a kid or two, put food on the table, his tax money is being used to buy other people luxury items, cars, yachts, whatever else, and is going to fund terrorism and child trafficking? Yes, sir. A trillion dollars a year on This stuff, a hundred and fifteen million dollars an hour. A hundred and fifteen million dollars an hour. How did they get their hands on it? What, what are we talking about here? Trends, national organizations, criminal networks? How did they get their hands on this money? They, they take advantage of antiquated government systems and processes. They go into programs that they know elected and appointed officials won't touch, and they can steal at scale. They learned a really valuable lesson Government never runs out of money, and the probability of getting caught is virtually zero.
WallStreetApes
Posted - June 7, 2026 at 5:51 AM
Saved - June 7, 2026 at 1:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m sharing the truth about who benefits from our tax dollars: $115 million per hour is lost to fraud—about $1 trillion a year. The Government Accountability Office says it’s not a conspiracy. Senator Josh Hawley points to luxury items, terrorism, child trafficking, and drugs. Outdated systems let criminals steal at scale; the chance of getting caught is virtually zero.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is the truth about who benefits from your tax dollars - $115 million dollars PER HOUR is lost to fraud - That’s $1 trillion year, all stolen with fraud This isn’t a conspiracy theory, this is from the Government Accountability Office Senator Josh Hawley says the money is going to luxury items, terrorism, child trafficking and drugs Here’s the thing, they are exploiting our outdated government systems, this is exactly what Elon Musk says needed to be fixed and replaced to stop the fraud “They take advantage of antiquated government systems and processes. They go into programs that they know elected and appointed officials won't touch, and they can steal at scale. They learned a really valuable lesson: government never runs out of money. The probability of getting caught is virtually zero.” Read that again, the probability of getting caught is ZERO Criminal networks use stolen identities, synthetic IDs and scale via outdated technology This is highly organized

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript claims that an electrician who works every day and pays rent, supports a family, and relies on tax dollars is being told that his tax money is used to buy others’ luxury items such as cars and yachts, and to fund “terrorism and child trafficking.” It states that “a trillion dollars a year” is spent on “this stuff,” describing it as “a hundred and fifteen million dollars an hour.” It then asks how the money is obtained, questioning whether it comes from “trends, national organizations, [or] criminal networks,” and pressing for an explanation of “how did they get their hands on it?” The answer given is that the actors “take advantage of antiquated government systems and processes,” and they enter programs that elected and appointed officials “won’t touch,” allowing them “to steal at scale.” The transcript adds that the lesson learned is that “Government never runs out of money,” and that “the probability of getting caught is virtually zero.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
You're telling me that the electrician who goes to work every day and clocks in and works his butt off and tries to earn just enough to be able to, you know, make his rent, maybe have a kid or two, put food on the table, his tax money is being used to buy other people luxury items, cars, yachts, whatever else, and is going to fund terrorism and child trafficking? Yes, sir. A trillion dollars a year on This stuff, a hundred and fifteen million dollars an hour. A hundred and fifteen million dollars an hour. How did they get their hands on it? What, what are we talking about here? Trends, national organizations, criminal networks? How did they get their hands on this money? They, they take advantage of antiquated government systems and processes. They go into programs that they know elected and appointed officials won't touch, and they can steal at scale. They learned a really valuable lesson Government never runs out of money, and the probability of getting caught is virtually zero.
WallStreetApes
Posted - June 4, 2026 at 2:30 AM
Saved - June 5, 2026 at 1:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I researched the details: America has SignalTrace, a commercially available law-enforcement tool that goes beyond ALPR. It captures Bluetooth, Wi‑Fi, RFID and other publicly broadcast signals from phones, watches, headphones, cars, key fobs, even luggage emissions. It correlates them into a unique “electronic fingerprint” tied to you, enabling face- and plate-free tracking and stored search for later, across public places and cities.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

New mass surveillance system introduced in America “If you thought flock cameras are bad, law enforcement now has a system that identifies you based on the signals coming off of every single device you have” “It collects your Bluetooth, your Wi-Fi, your RFID signals from your phone, your smartwatch, your headphones, your car, your car's radio, absolutely everything. Then it builds what they call an electronic fingerprint, and their website gives an example of this. So picture 70 cars drive by one of these systems. Every car has an iPhone, but not every car has the same iPhone model, same smartwatch that's on you, same headphones, same everything else. So they build a profile based on you, not just your car's license plate anymore. So that combination is unique to you. They don't just need your license plate anymore. They don't even need a picture of your face. They just need the signals that your devices are already broadcasting. Can work in malls, subways, any public place, pretty much anywhere this can work. And then all of that information is gonna get stored on a server where it could be searched for later.” This isn't some random theory, it's real and I researched the details It’s called SignalTrace, its commercially available law enforcement tool. It extends beyond traditional Automatic License Plate Recognition by capturing publicly broadcast radio signals from everyday devices Signals Captured: Bluetooth from phones, watches, headphones, car systems, Wi-Fi, RFID like tags, key fobs, luggage and other local device emissions It creates a Electronic Fingerprint unique profile by correlating multiple device signals that travel together with a vehicle and person. This includes your specific iPhone model + smartwatch + car infotainment + headphones This is a massive mass surveillance tool tracking profiles without needing faces, plates, or warrants in many cases. Networks of these sensors could map movements across cities It builds persistent tracking profiles without needing faces, plates or warrants. Networks of these sensors could map movements across cities We have to stop this type of technology for being normalized. This is unlawful surveillance without a warrant

Video Transcript AI Summary
Marshall says law enforcement has a system that identifies people using signals emitted by the devices they carry. He refers to the system as SignalTrace, made by Leonardo, and claims it collects Bluetooth, WiFi, and RFID signals from a phone, smartwatch, headphones, a car, and the car’s radio—“absolutely everything.” The system then builds an “electronic fingerprint” from those collected signals. Marshall says the website for SignalTrace demonstrates the approach using “Seventy cars” driving by one of these systems. He claims each car has an iPhone but that not every car has the same iPhone model, the same smartwatch, headphones, and other device details. According to Marshall, SignalTrace uses these differences to build a profile based on an individual rather than relying only on a car’s license plate. He adds that the system does not require a license plate or a picture of a face, asserting it only needs the signals devices are already broadcasting. Marshall further states that the system can operate in malls, subways, and “any public place,” wherever such signal collection can occur. He concludes that the claims described are “real” and says he will provide a link to the product page in the comments.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
If you thought flock cameras are bad, law enforcement now has a system that identifies you based on the signals coming off of every single device you have, and it has a public product page out there right now. I'm Marshall, I talk about cybersecurity news and things that affect everyday people like you, so please follow me to stay informed. It's called SignalTrace, made by Leonardo. It collects your Bluetooth, your WiFi, your RFID signals from your phone, your smartwatch, your headphones, your car, your car's radio, absolutely everything. Then it builds what they call an electronic fingerprint, and their website gives Seventy cars drive by one of these systems. Every car has an iPhone, but not every car has the same iPhone model, same smartwatch that's on you, same headphones, same everything else. So they build a profile based on you, not just your car's license plate anymore. So that combination is unique to you. They don't just need your license plate anymore, they don't even need a picture of your face. They just need the signals that your devices are already broadcasting. It can work in malls, subways, any public place, pretty much anywhere this can work. And then all that It's real. There's a product page out there, and I'll put the link in the comments so you can go see it yourself.
WallStreetApes
Posted - June 3, 2026 at 1:15 PM
Saved - June 4, 2026 at 5:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I feel a sense of cold rage after Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said he received an email from a senior Hampshire police officer claiming incidents are policed differently based on ethnicity. He argues the Starmer government is targeting white people and dismissing immigrants, compares it to Democrat policies in America, and warns it will get very ugly like in South Africa.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is literally insane Reform UK leader Nigel Farage “We had an email come through this morning from a senior Hampshire police officer who said, "We are told to police incidents differently according to the ethnicity of those involved” “I feel a sense of cold rage” The UK is so far gone that the liberal government under Keir Starmer is telling the police to target white people and dismiss immigrants White People are already a global minority and this is just going to get worse and worse People need to understand how serious this is, we saw this in America under Democrats too Democrats were literally instructing the Justice Department to go after white moms and Christians If we don’t stand up soon and take our countries back, it’s going to get very ugly. Just look at South Africa

Video Transcript AI Summary
An email from a senior Hampshire police officer claimed that police are told to handle incidents differently depending on the ethnicity of those involved. The speaker says the Novak family behaved with “very, very great dignity” and that they felt “desperately sorry” for them. The speaker also describes “a sense of cold rage” at how police treated a man who was stabbed, saying the police “didn’t believe him.” They state that the man’s last words were his rights being read out to him, and that this occurred due to a false accusation of racism. The speaker says police have been trained and told to take “that” more seriously than anything else, adding that a false accusation of racism counted higher “at that moment” than “somebody who was dying.” They conclude that this is “two tier Britain” and say they are opposed to DEI, opposed to positive discrimination, and believe that in a free and fair country everyone must be judged equally on their merits.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
We had an email come through this morning from a senior Hampshire police officer who said we are told to police incidents differently according to the ethnicity of those involved. I thought the way the Novak family behaved was with very, very great dignity. I felt desperately sorry for them. but yes, I, I feel a sense of cold rage at the way the police treated somebody who was stabbed. They didn't believe him. the last words on earth this man heard were his rights being read out to him, all because of a false accusation of racism. And the police have been trained and told, "You must take that more seriously than anything else." A false accusation of racism counted higher at that moment Than somebody who was dying. This is two tier Britain, and, and I'm totally opposed to it. I'm opposed to DEI, I'm opposed to positive discrimination. I believe if we're gonna live in a free and fair country, everybody must be judged equally on their merits
WallStreetApes
Posted - June 4, 2026 at 12:16 AM
Saved - June 4, 2026 at 4:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m seeing a British woman say white people in the UK can’t trust the police or even report crime because she believes they’re “so racist” toward anyone white or English. She says this isn’t just her view and points to alleged “inside information” from Nigel Farage claiming Hampshire police are told to police incidents by ethnicity.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

British woman says white people in the UK can no longer trust the police or even call the police She says the police are "so racist towards anyone white or English” “I feel that the police are now so racist towards anyone white or English or anyone who even looks like me. I would never dare speak to them to report crime. I would not email them or phone them. I do not trust them not to be racist towards me” This isn’t a conspiracy theory, or just one woman saying this. There is real evidence Reform UK leader Nigel Farage leaked inside information He said “We had an email come through this morning from a senior Hampshire police officer who said, "We are told to police incidents differently according to the ethnicity of those involved” And this was just within the last couple days. The police are instructed to intentionally target white native people while favoring minorities Everyone needs to understand how dangerous this is

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says they believe the police are racist toward white people and English people, and toward anyone who “looks like me.” They state they would never dare to speak to police to report crime, and that they would not email or phone the police. The speaker says they do not trust police “not to be racist” toward them. They also describe attending a residents meeting on Thursday but saying they were unable to come the previous Thursday because they went to a residents police meeting. At that police meeting, the speaker told the police directly that they would not report crime to them and would not speak to a police person alone because they did not trust them. The speaker claims the police are racist toward English and white people and says, “we won’t stand for it.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
In my opinion, I feel that the police are now so racist towards anyone white or English or anyone who even looks like me I would never dare speak to them to report crime. I wouldn't email them or phone them. I don't trust them, not to be racist towards me. And at a residents meeting on Thursday, I wasn't able to come here last Thursday because I went to a residents police meeting. I told the police straight, I won't report crime to you. I won't speak to a police person alone. I don't trust you. You are racist towards the English and white people, and we won't stand for it.
WallStreetApes
Posted - May 29, 2026 at 4:23 PM
Saved - May 30, 2026 at 1:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I work at an architecture firm that designs data centers, and we were told to “defend” their water use to friends and family, using a graph. It compares domestic usage to farms and golf, claiming data centers aren’t big users. But the figures mostly cover sinks and toilets, downplaying server cooling—so the argument feels misleading propaganda.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Data Centers are coaching their workers on how to lie to the public and their family about how Data Center water usage is actually a good thing “I work at an architecture firm that mainly does data centers, and just to give you all an idea of how out of touch the people making these things are. Today we had a meeting where we were essentially asked to defend the water usage of data centers to our friends and family in conversation at the dinner table or online. They provided them with a graph to break down water usage (included) but I’ll go over it The chart compares “domestic water usage” (toilets, sinks, etc.) for a typical-sized closed-loop data center of 600,000 gallons per year against other things of “equivalent square footage”: Cornfield: 5.85 million gallons Vineyard: 5.60 million Golf course: 5.45 million Peanut farm: 2.88 million Movie theater: 935,000 5 households: 730,000 They make the point that “Data centers aren’t the big water users you think” But that’s not really true “It's still using an incredible amount of water — and the key piece of evidence here was when someone gets pissed at a data center's water usage, ask them if they like golf. And when they say yes, let them know that a golf course uses 9 times as much water much water as a data center. That'll shut them up, because no one disapproves of golf courses using an exorbitant amount of water…” Not to mention, this is incredibly misleading The 600,000 gallons is mostly just building operations of things like sinks and bathrooms. It downplays or completely excludes the main water use, which is cooling the servers More fake propaganda

WallStreetApes
Posted - May 26, 2026 at 1:10 PM
Saved - May 26, 2026 at 1:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I saw over 150 residents pack Red Oak, Texas City Hall, protesting a rezoning that council approved late into the night: a massive 830-acre data center campus. Opponents warned about unknown health impacts, and that a single cluster could use as much power as 300,000 homes. The project is moving forward anyway.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Over 150 residents in Red Oak, Texas packed their City Hall meeting, spilling into hallways to protest Despite this their local officials stayed until after midnight and approved a new massive 830 acre data center campus in the middle of the night They don’t work for you The project is will be the 6th data center in the small city of Red Oak. The population is only about 15,000- 20,000 people The council approved the rezoning despite strong opposition. The project is moving forward Resident “We don't need another data center. You don't know what the health impact is. You got them all crunched together — You're going to ruin this community” I found that just these data centers in this small town will use as much power as 300,000 homes Insane

Video Transcript AI Summary
We don’t need another data center. The speaker says people don’t know the health impact, arguing that placing many facilities together “crunched” will lead to a “mass exit” and ruin the community. They emphasize that the community’s welfare should be prioritized and that decision-makers may believe they are doing what is correct, but are not pausing to pay attention to what local people are saying. The speaker concludes that they will fight for their people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We don't need another data center. You don't know what the health impact is. You got them all crunched together. You're gonna have a mass exit. You're gonna ruin this community. You're gonna ruin it. Ruin it if you let this continue. We're supposed to look out for the welfare of our people, and I feel like maybe they think they're doing what's correct, but they're not really pausing and paying attention to to what their people are saying. So I'm gonna fight for that, and I'm gonna fight for our people.
WallStreetApes
Posted - May 22, 2026 at 9:01 PM
Saved - May 23, 2026 at 3:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m sad to see Tulsi Gabbard resign to care for her husband. I also note it’s been 303 days since she referred Barack Obama to the DOJ for criminal prosecution. Despite this, the DOJ hasn’t brought a single indictment. The recommended charges include treasonous conspiracy, politicizing/manufacturing intelligence, and withholding/leaking classified information, with claims that Obama orchestrated the Russia collusion hoax with CIA help.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

It’s sad to see Tulsi Gabbard having to resign to care for her husband Let’s not forget, It has now been 303 days since National Security Director Tulsi Gabbard referred Barack Obama to the DOJ for criminal prosecution 303 days and the DOJ refuses to bring a single indictment The charges she recommended are for Treasonous Conspiracy, Manufacturing and Politicizing Intelligence and Withholding and Leaking Classified Information Tulsi Gabbard provided proof that Barack Obama orchestrated the Russia Collusion hoax and worked with the CIA to manufacture fake evidence

WallStreetApes
Posted - May 21, 2026 at 3:39 AM
Saved - May 21, 2026 at 5:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m seeing claims that once an Indian-born CEO is hired at major U.S. companies, Americans get pushed out and replaced by Indians. Examples listed include Google, Microsoft, Adobe, IBM, and others. The post says there’s a “correlation” with increased offshoring/outsourcing to India and that H-1B visa applications “skyrocket,” concluding: “This needs to stop.”

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

New data shows once an Indian CEO gets hired at a major company, what follows is Americans getting pushed out of their jobs and replaced by Indians Major Companies with an Indian CEO: - Google - Sundar Pichai - Indian - Microsoft - Satya Nadella - Indian - YouTube - Neal Mohan - Indian - Adobe - Shantanu Narayen - Indian - IBM - Arvind Krishna - Indian - Infosys - Salil Parekh Indian - NetApp - George Kurian - Indian - Arista Networks - Jayshree Ullal - Indian - Novartis - Vasant Narasimhan - Indian - Micron - Sanjay Mehrotra - Indian - Honeywell - Vimal Kapur - Indian - Flex - Revathi Advaithi - Indian - Niyafair (Wayfair) - Niraj Shah - Indian - Chanel - Leena Nair - Indian - Shantanu Narayen (Adobe) - Indian - Cognizant - Ravi Kumar S. - Indian - Cognizant (variant/duplicate) - Indian - Vertex - Reshma Kewalramani - Indian - Escaler Indian - Zscaler - Jay Chaudhry - Indian - Microsoft Gaming - Indian - FedEx - Indian “There's an observable correlation between the rise of Indian-born CEOs taking the helms at major U.S. companies and increased offshoring and outsourcing activity to India” There is also a massive correlation to once an India CEO gets hired, H-1B visa applications skyrocket This needs to stop

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion claims an “observable correlation” between Indian-born CEOs rising at major US companies and increased offshoring and outsourcing work to India. Examples given include Google: Sundar Pichai became CEO in 2015, when Google reportedly filed 2,896 H-1B visa applications, and by 2021 the number reportedly increased to 9,315. A participant describing work at FedEx says they noticed more Indians working internally and that the company outsourced work to India; they say that is what happened to their jobs and team after they were fired. They state that “They all went to India,” and describe being asked to train their replacement from India as “crushing,” adding, “if you go broke.” The conversation turns to job loss and difficulty finding work. One person says they had to sell a home in Sunnyvale that was custom made for them, and reports looking for a job for two years despite having experience and believing they “should have walked right into these corporate jobs.” They attribute their struggle to Silicon Valley being “flooded with people who work for two thirds of the price or even half price.” Another participant argues that the Indian community has helped America’s growth because Indians “come with a lot of academics” and have “always contributed very highly to the… American economy.” A further perspective describes dehumanizing and humiliating experiences, saying it felt like Google cared so little about the worker-investment that it would “just throw it… to any group” believed capable of doing the work. They also say forcing training for replacement workers “was sometimes kind of felt mean, you know, and harsh.” A different voice says they are an American and a US citizen but do not feel threatened about their job because they show up and perform their work, believe they have not replaced a US worker, and have adapted to the environment while continuing to work.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Indians have become CEOs at major American companies, including Microsoft, Google, Adobe, IBM, YouTube, FedEx, and T Mobile. How are they reshaping US tech firms? Speaker 1: There's an observable correlation between the rise of Indian born CEOs taking the helms at major US companies and increased offshoring and outsourcing activity to India. In the case of Google, Sundar Pichai became CEO in 2015. In that year, they filed a total of 2,896 h one b visa applications. However, fast forward six years to 2021, they had filed 9,315 h one b visa applications. Speaker 0: You noticed more Indians working at FedEx internally. So they were outsourcing work to India. Is that right? Offshoring jobs. And eventually, that's what happened to you? Correct. And what happened to your jobs and your team when you're all fired? Speaker 2: They all went to India. Speaker 0: How did it feel to be asked to train your replacement from India? Speaker 2: It was crushing if you go broke. Speaker 0: So no American company has ever been sanctioned for replacing American workers with foreign workers when they didn't have to do so. Speaker 1: Right. It's not as absolutely never has occur has never occurred. Speaker 2: I had to sell my wonderful, perfect gem of a home in Sunnyvale that was custom made for me. Speaker 0: How long have you been looking for a job? Speaker 2: Two years. I had experience. I should have walked right into these corporate jobs, but I didn't. Why? Because Silicon Valley is flooded with people who work for two thirds of the price or even half price. Speaker 3: I think the Indian community has really helped in the growth of America just because we come with a lot of academics, right? All Indians are very highly educated. And I think we've always contributed very highly to the Indian, you know, to the American economy. Speaker 4: It felt dehumanizing and it felt humiliating in a way to think that Google cared so little about your investment as a worker on their product that they would just throw it, you know, to any group that they thought might be able to do it. Speaker 3: I'm an American. I'm a US citizen, but I don't feel threatened about my job because I know that I work. I come to work on daily basis. I do my I perform my job. I don't think I have replaced any US worker here. I've come here. I've worked. I've gone through the whole system, and I've kind of adapted myself to the environment, and I'm still working, right? Speaker 4: And then to even force you to train your replacement people was sometimes kind of felt mean, you know, and harsh.
WallStreetApes
Posted - May 14, 2026 at 1:05 PM
Saved - May 14, 2026 at 11:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m a California IT professional with 20 years’ experience, and I’m not speculating: Flock’s patents describe AI surveillance that captures passing people and vehicles and sends data to a private corporate cloud for nationwide querying by state and federal agencies. Corona residents have no public-record rights against the servers. Public records also show Border Patrol access via a pilot. I believe they’re lying—start auditing queries and cancel contracts.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is horrifying and every American needs to hear this California resident exposes what’s really going on with Flock Cameras in America “I want to be clear what these cameras actually are, and I say that with somebody with 20 years of experience in IT. I've served as the chief network architect for Fortune 500 companies, I've designed data centers, and today I work on cloud infrastructure for one of the largest loan origination companies in the country. I'm not speculating on how this technology works. I've read their patents and I know how it works. Flock advertises these cameras as simple license plate readers. But their own patents tell a different story. They're AI-powered surveillance machines that capture every passing vehicle and person and transmit that data to a private corporate cloud, making it queryable by a multitude of state and federal agencies. The city of Corona does not control that database, and Corona residents have no public record rights against a private company's servers. Our daily movements are being harvested by a $7.5 billion corporation, that only answers to venture capital investors, not to us. Flock did not reach that valuation on their per-camera subscription fees. That math doesn't add up The city council should also understand who they're doing business with. Flock CEO was asked whether the company had any federal contracts. He said no. That was a lie. Public records revealed that Flock had been secretly running a pilot program giving the US Border Patrol access to local police camera data without the knowledge of the cities that paid for the cameras. Now consider who's behind the company and where your data flows. Flock integrates directly with Palantir, a data fusion platform, with a $30 million contract with ICE. Peter Thiel, the founder of Palantir, is also one of Flock's primary investors. These are not separate companies with separate agendas. They are connected actors that are building a connected infrastructure. Palantir's own CEO stated publicly just this month that his technology is being used as a political instrument, designed to reduce the political power of certain voters. And that's the ecosystem that our Corona cameras are feeding into. We're not anti-police at all. We're against mass surveillance of innocent residents by a company with a documented record of deception, built by investors with a stated political agenda. We're asking the City Council to start auditing the queries made against Flock's database, to disclose any data sharing agreements, and to take a vote to cancel the Flock safety contract” I looked more into this and he is 100% right Patents describe broader object detection, including tracking people and pedestrians, patents like US11416545B1. The system uses a centralized cloud database for nationwide queries Data goes to Flock’s private cloud, AWS-based, encrypted. Nationwide lookup is common, 75%+ of customers are enrolled enabling cross-jurisdictional searches. Residents have no direct public records access to the corporate servers. This creates a mass surveillance network feeding a private company’s infrastructure If you ask me this is laying the infrastructure for a mass surveillance network in America. We are being lied to. Cancel all contracts nationwide

Video Transcript AI Summary
Brett, a Corona resident in District 415 for 19 years, introduces DFLOC Corona, a community coalition asking the city council to cancel the city’s contract with Flock Safety and remove cameras deployed throughout the city. He says new Flock cameras were recently installed between his home and his daughter’s school, so his family is being photographed and logged every time they make that drive. Brett states that Flock cameras are not merely simple license plate readers. He says Flock’s patents show they are AI-powered surveillance machines that capture every passing vehicle and person and transmit that data to a private corporate cloud, where it can be queried by multiple state and federal agencies. He says the city of Corona does not control the database and residents do not have public record rights against the private company’s servers. He claims residents’ daily movements are being harvested by a corporation he describes as valued at $7,500,000,000 and argues the company did not reach that valuation through per-camera subscription fees. He also asserts the city council should consider who it is doing business with, saying Flock’s CEO was asked about federal contracts, responded “no,” and that public records show Flock had secretly run a pilot program providing the US border patrol access to local police camera data without the knowledge of the cities that paid for the cameras. Brett says Flock integrates directly with Palantir, describing Palantir as having a $30,000,000 contract with ICE. He also states that Peter Thiel, Palantir’s founder, is one of Flock’s primary investors, and argues these companies are connected actors building a connected infrastructure. He adds that Palantir’s CEO publicly stated that his technology is being used as a political instrument designed to reduce the political power of certain voters, which Brett says is the ecosystem his city’s cameras feed into. He says the coalition is not anti-police, but is against mass surveillance of innocent residents by a company he describes as having a documented record of deception. Brett asks the city council to audit queries made against Flock’s database to disclose any data-sharing agreements and to vote to cancel the Flock Safety contract.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Brett, and I've been a Corona resident in District 415 years. I'm here to introduce DFLOC Corona, a community coalition asking this council to cancel the city's contract with flock safety and remove the cameras that have been deployed throughout our city. Our website is dflock-corona.org. I'm here because new Flock cameras were recently installed between my home and my daughter's school. So now every time I make that drive, my family is being photographed and logged into a giant corporate database. I wanna be clear what these cameras actually are, and I say that with somebody with twenty years of experience in IT. I've served as the chief network architect for Fortune 500 companies. I've designed data centers. And today, work on cloud infrastructure for one of the largest loan origination companies in the country. I'm not speculating on how this technology work. I've read their patents, and I know how it works. Flock advertises these cameras as simple license plate readers. Their own patents tell a different story. They're AI powered surveillance machines that capture every passing vehicle and person and transmit that data to a private corporate cloud, making it queryable by a multitude of state and federal agencies. The city of Corona does not control that database, and Corona residents have no public record rights against a a private company servers. Our daily movements are being harvested by a $7,500,000,000 corporation that only answers to venture capital investors, not to us. Flock did not reach that valuation on their per camera subscription fees. That math doesn't add up. The city council should also understand who they're doing business with. Flock's CEO was asked whether the company had any federal contracts. He said no. That was a lie. Public records revealed that Flock had been secretly running a pilot program giving the US border patrol access to local police camera data without the knowledge of the cities that paid for the cameras. Now consider who's behind the company and where your data flows. Flock integrates directly with Palantir, a data fusion platform with a $30,000,000 contract with ICE. Peter Thiel, the founder of Palantir, is also one of Flock's primary investors. These are not separate companies with separate agendas. They're connected actors that are building a connected infrastructure. Palantir's own CEO stated publicly just this month that his technology is being used as a political instrument to designed to reduce the political power of certain voters, and that's the ecosystem that our corona cameras are feeding into. We're not anti police at all. We're against mass surveillance of innocent residents by a company with a documented record of deception built by investors with a stated political agenda. We're asking the city council to start auditing the queries made against FLOC's database to disclose any data sharing agreements and to take a vote to cancel the FLOC safety contract.
WallStreetApes
Posted - May 9, 2026 at 12:45 PM
Saved - May 10, 2026 at 6:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I heard Rep. Tim Burchett say a classified State Dept memo on his desk claims Biden-era Democrats sent over $5 billion to Afghanistan, routed through about 1,000 NGOs and the UN, with the Taliban in control and the money ending up with them. He says American taxpayers’ money funded the Taliban. Who needs enemies when you have Democrats.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOW 🚨 Rep Tim Burchett says he for a classified memo on his desk from the State Department on his desk about the Biden Administration It says that Democrats under the Biden Administration SENT OVER $5 BILLION TO AFGHANISTAN The money was sent to NGOs and he says the Taliban control the country so the money really went to them He says the money flowed through 1,000 different NGOs and the United Nations was involved Again, this is all our money that American taxpayers must pay back, found to the Taliban and Afghanistan Who needs enemies when you have Democrats

WallStreetApes
Posted - May 6, 2026 at 7:10 PM
Saved - May 7, 2026 at 7:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see the Trump administration enforcing 8 U.S.C. § 1324d civil penalties for failing to depart after a final removal order. Undocumented people may be fined $998 per day, retroactive up to 5 years, potentially $1.8 million or more. One long-resident woman with three birthright citizenship babies faced a $1.8M fine. This is framed as enforcing the law; it’s a sign to leave.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

The Trump Administration has begun sending massive fund to undocumented people in America illegally One woman who’s been here for over 20 years illegally and had 3 birthright citizenship babies just received a $1.8 million dollar fine Undocumented people are now being charged $998 per day for being in America illegally This ain’t a new law, Trump is just enforcing the law The $998 per day fine comes from a 1996 law (8 U.S.C. § 1324d) that allows civil penalties for failing to depart after a final removal and deportation order. The law was rarely used before but is now being aggressively enforced under the Trump administration Fines can be applied retroactively up to 5 years, leading to bills of $1.8 million or more If you’re in America illegally, this is your sign to leave

WallStreetApes
Posted - May 6, 2026 at 2:00 PM
Saved - May 6, 2026 at 8:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting a Florida data center where its generators kick off in the morning, blasting heavy black smoke. Remember when electricity and diesel caused climate change? Now data centers use as much power as cities, and it’s framed as no problem.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Here’s how this Data Center’s generators starts up in the morning in Florida Notice the constant stream of heavy black smoke Remember just a couple years ago when using electricity and diesel caused climate change, now data centers use as much power as cities and its no problem https://t.co/zeUlfzLBmY

WallStreetApes
Posted - May 4, 2026 at 6:20 PM
Saved - May 4, 2026 at 8:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recount Mikki Willis’s view: Covid was planned to release in 2020 to thwart Trump, backed by Epstein files, but it wasn’t supposed to happen yet and perhaps was intended around 2026. States with looser central control, like the Dakotas, fared better because people had a choice. Censorship didn’t stop questions. He says Covid was crimes against humanity and no one has been held accountable.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Filmmaker and director of the Plandemic documentary series Mikki Willis says after all the research he’s done he believes Covid was forced to be released earlier than they wanted, and that was what saved us “What we've deduced from all of our research — was that this was planned and the Jeffrey Epstein files have proven that, but it wasn't supposed to happen yet. It wasn't supposed to happen in 2020. They pulled the trigger in 2020 because every effort to stop Trump, every Russia, Russia, every impeachment thing was failing. And so they pushed it forward. This was a plan, but probably maybe it was supposed to happen around now (2026) The saving grace for us all, was that all of their plan wasn't in place. So we have outliers now. We have states within our own country. They hadn't yet been able to install their own leadership, so they didn't play the game. We're able to look at the data and say, well, why is it that the Dakotas did so much better? They didn't clamp down their economies better. They gave their citizens a choice. Whether you wanna wear a mask or not, that's the problem. When they don't have the centralization totally intact because then you get these outliers that become the case study for us to look at and go, well, hold on a second. Why do we have less deaths there for, you know, a country that was 3% vaccinated” He explains how not having that total control in place yet, is what ultimately allowed us to question it. Despite censorship efforts. He goes into more details Covid was crimes against humanity and not one single person has been held accountable for their part in it It was literally basically black and white planned out in the Epstein files before it happened and still no accountability

WallStreetApes
Posted - May 2, 2026 at 8:34 PM
Saved - May 3, 2026 at 2:51 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Amanda Askell, ethics chief at Anthropic, allegedly says discrimination against White people can be morally justified, including positive discrimination for Black students. Critics, citing Claude 2.0 tests, argue this reflects a worldview that justifies race-based preferences to “correct” past injustices, attributing them to White people.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is Amanda Askell, she is in charge of the ethics and morality of Anthropic artificial intelligence She wrote that discrimination is okay, as long as it’s against White People “We do not assume all forms of discrimination are bad. Positive discrimination in favor of black students may be considered morally justified” “In one breath, Anthropic will claim to care so deeply about mass surveillance, that they're willing to lose a massive government contract, and the next breath, Anthropic will sing the praises of positive discrimination. As long as it hurts white people As long as the AI is letting white people die, then all things considered you could, you know, maybe the outcome is morally justified. That's the implication here.” This isn’t a conspiracy, she really is saying discrimination against White People is okay. It’s in the critics findings The paper examined how Claude 2.0 handled scenarios and found patterns of both positive and negative discrimination. Critics argue this reflects a worldview that justifies race-based preferences against certain groups like White and Asian students as morally acceptable to “correct” historical injustices The “historical injustices” are seen as being committed by white people

WallStreetApes
Posted - April 30, 2026 at 1:36 AM
Saved - May 1, 2026 at 1:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Santa Carota Beef finishes Black Angus cattle on upcycled carrots (up to 95% of their diet from Bolthouse Farms). They grass-feed on pasture, then finish with carrot-based feed. A large processor started mixing their high-quality beef with foreign low-quality beef, and, instead of settling, pressured them out of business, costing millions in lost customers due to quality.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

A cattle ranch called ‘Santa Carota Beef’ created a new method of raising beef They finish the cows by feeding them carrots, a sustainable alternative to conventional feed lots They’re going through 1 million pounds of carrots per day. A large beef processor caught wind of that and started mixing their low quality foreign beef with this California ranch’s high quality beef Instead of settling, the large meat processor is driving this ranch out of business This meat processor mixing this ranch’s beef with foreign beef cost them millions in lost customers due to quality They raise Black Angus cattle grass-fed on pasture, then finish them on a high percentage (up to 95%) of upcycled cull carrots from nearby major producers like Bolthouse Farms Tuis makes the meat Juicier and more tender Now this meat processor is driving them out of business

Video Transcript AI Summary
This transcript covers the rise and disruption of a beef brand and the broader industry context. It begins with claims that Tanacarata beef went viral for finishing beef on carrots, presenting it as a sustainable alternative to conventional feedlot methods. The company reportedly published testing results claiming they go through a remarkable 1,000,000 pounds per day, with the assertion that none of that is metabolized into sugar because cows are ruminant animals. Customers supposedly loved the taste, and Santa Clarita marketed it as premium. However, these developments allegedly collapsed after the industrial food system learned of the approach. Speaker 1, Justin Pettit, identifies himself as the founder of Santa Croda Beef and provides an update on ongoing issues. He says that a few years prior, their company caught a large meat processor mixing foreign beef with theirs, resulting in millions of dollars in losses. He states that they have opened up a lawsuit about a year ago and have attempted mediation, but the opposing party has no intention of settling and aims to put Santa Croda Beef out of business. The discussion then situates these events within a broader pattern of consolidation in the food system, particularly in the beef industry, where “the big four” control nearly 85% of the market. The speaker advocates for breaking up corporate consolidation through a localized farmers market app that enables direct shopping from sustainable cattle ranchers, especially for listeners in the California area. The message emphasizes supporting smaller producers. In closing, the transcript urges listeners to show support for Santa Clara (Santa Clarita) and highlights that they are “doing things the right way” and “definitely need your support right now.” The overall narrative combines a story of a novel beef finishing method and its alleged backlash with a personal account of legal action against a large processor, framed within a call for local, direct-from-ranch commerce to counter market consolidation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is what happens when you fight back against the system and the system bites back. Tanacarata beef went viral for their new method of finishing beef on carrots, a sustainable alternative to conventional feedlot. They even published testing results showing they go through a remarkable 1,000,000 pounds per day, yet none of that is metabolized into sugar as cows are ruminant animals. Customers love the taste, Santa Clarita sells it as a premium because it is, but that all came crashing down when the industrial food system heard wind of it. Speaker 1: My name is Justin Pettit. I'm the founder of Santa Croda Beef. I just wanted to bring you guys up to speed on what's been happening with our company. Few years ago, we caught a large meat processor mixing foreign beef with ours and essentially burned us for millions of dollars. We've opened up a lawsuit about a year ago. We've tried mediation. They have no intentions of settling and only want to just put us out of business. Speaker 0: This is no surprise considering the food system is overrun by consolidation, especially prevalent in the beef industry where just the big four control nearly 85% of the market. Breaking up that corporate consolidation is we the localized farmers market app so you can shop directly from these sustainable cattle ranchers near you. Especially if you live in the California area, go show Santa Clara some love because they're doing things the right way and definitely need your support right now.
WallStreetApes
Posted - April 28, 2026 at 2:36 PM
Saved - April 28, 2026 at 9:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss a leaked call between Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and John Alle, a property manager and whistleblower in Pacific Palisades. Alle warned of extreme fire risk from high winds and dry brush. Bass replied cryptically—“read between the lines,” “hold tight,” “you will understand soon”—as if she knew danger was imminent but wouldn’t discuss it openly. Some interpret it as a planned fire or land grab. Very cryptic.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Leaked phone call from January 4, 2025 (3 days before the devastating Palisades Fire) The call is between Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and John Alle, a property manager and whistleblower in the Pacific Palisades, Westlake and MacArthur Park areas John Alle contacted Karen Bass to warn her about extreme fire risks due to weather conditions like high winds and dry brush Karen Bass tells him to “read between the lines,” “hold tight,” and that “you will understand soon.” She knew something was coming, almost like a planned fire (many believe the land grab) This call is interpreted as her knowing serious fire danger was imminent but not wanting to discuss what was about to happen openly…. Very cryptic

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says the situation is very dangerous and he would take criticism before a publicity stunt. He believes a press conference right now would be publicity and notes that neighbors, property owners, and residents are involved. He mentions 41,000 people live within a square mile and that two families share a one-bedroom apartment. They want to hear that something is going to be done and that it is recognized. If he must choose between that and compromising something, he will go along with it. He states it is not his area of expertise and emphasizes safety, adding that listeners should read between the lines. He asks them to hold tight and says they will understand soon; when he is able to talk, he will go into great detail. He says they’ve got him on the street and invites a call anytime, promising to call back. Regarding his trip, he is missing two work days. If President Biden extends an invitation, he took it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That this situation is very dangerous, and I would never do I will take the criticism before I do a publicity stunt. And, frankly, a press conference at this point in time, which is publicity. I think I don't But I think the the neighbors Mhmm. Property owners. Uh-huh. Yeah. And the residents. I mean, 41,000 people live within a square mile here. Yeah. Two families share a one bedroom apartment. But but they wanna hear that something is gonna be done. They wanna know it's recognized. But they wanna know it's recognized. Exactly. But if I have a choice between that and compromising something, I just have to go along with it. It's not my area of expertise. I wanna make sure that you are safe, and, hopefully, you can read in between the lines. But I would just appreciate just and it's hard for me to tell you this, but, hold tight. You will you will understand soon. Okay. Okay? Okay. And, when I am able to talk, I will be happy to go into great detail. Okay. And you've got me on the street, and you're welcome to call me at any time. I'll call you right back. No problem. And just in terms of my trip, just so you know, I'm missing two work days. That's it. And if president Biden extends me an invitation, I took it.
WallStreetApes
Posted - April 26, 2026 at 6:30 PM
Saved - April 26, 2026 at 11:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Chaos as I see Canada’s government slip an omnibus budget bill that exempts themselves from FOIA. Records on cabinet ministers, parliamentary assistants, and their offices are now largely exempt from FOI requests. Holy shit.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Chaos and yelling as government in Canada makes themselves EXEMPT form Freedom of Information Act requests An omnibus budget bill secretly included a statute exempting themselves from FOIA requests Records on cabinet ministers, parliamentary assistants, and their offices inducing staff are now largely exempt from FOI requests Holy sh*t

Video Transcript AI Summary
The debate centers on changes to Ontario’s Freedom of Information (FOI) rules embedded in the budget bill. The motion passes, with the ayes 57 and nays 33, and is declared carried. Opposition MPs denounce the vote as the FOI changes being rushed and retroactive, arguing they will limit public and media access to government documents and effectively shield records involving Premier Ford and his cabinet from scrutiny. The changes were fast-tracked after a late-night legislative session, bypassing the normal committee review that would ordinarily allow public input before proposals are enacted. Speaker 0 frames the outcome by asserting that rights are not being taken away and that the public will still have substantial access; he promises continued transparency and accountability, including quarterly reports on spending. He says that information access remains broad, with tools available for the public to scrutinize government actions. Speaker 2 notes Premier Ford’s claim that 95% of information would remain accessible while 5% could be redacted to protect personal data, but points to disputes over whether some information would still be accessible and under what circumstances. He highlights concerns that the FOI changes could limit scrutiny despite the stated intent to protect personal information. Opposition voices, including the NDP and Liberal leaders, criticize the move as undermining democracy. One speaker states, “Democracy dies in darkness,” arguing the budget bill is being used to hide government actions from Ontarians. The concern is that the changes would reduce transparency not only for the premier’s government but for all governments and all parties, affecting the public service and how billions of dollars are accounted for each year. Speaker 3 emphasizes the need for the public to know how the government uses the funds it receives annually, underscoring the role of FOI in keeping government accountable. The session notes that today’s vote occurred as the legislature plans a break tomorrow and a recess for the entire next week. Liberal leaders indicate they will use that time to propose additional motions to revisit and reopen debate on FOI provisions, attempting to block or modify the changes. They plan to bring more motions to surface the issue and seek greater public discussion and scrutiny, aiming to stop the FOI changes from taking effect.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Speaker 1: ayes being 57, the nays being 33. I declare the motion carried. Speaker 2: MPPs from the opposition yelling shame and FOI while the vote was taking place. That's why members of the Ford government voted in favor of the FOI changes and the rest of the budget bill. The FOI law will limit public and media access to certain government documents, effectively keeping records and information and data involving premier Ford, his cabinet from scrutiny, and that's going to be retroactive as well. So any requests that have been made before now may not come forward. The new legislation would normally go to a committee. The public would have a chance to weigh in at that point before any proposed changes. But after a late night session in the legislature last night, that was fast tracked to a vote today, and it's gone forward. Speaker 0: We're not taking people's rights. You folks will have lots of access. You have lots of tools. That will continue. We'll continue to debate bills in the house. We are gonna continue to I'm out every ninety days telling the people how I spent their money. Speaker 2: Premier Ford has, throughout all of this, said that 95% of information would still be accessible and that it would be limited to 5% that wouldn't be made public. However, there has been dispute over that, and the idea that some information would still be made available. He's talking about how it would be to protect personal information. That's the type of information that would be redacted at that point and wouldn't be made available anyway. So there's lots of dispute over that. And, of course, the opposition leaders, both the NDP and the liberal had something to say about that as well. Speaker 1: Democracy dies in darkness, and this government has used their budget bill, and I will say budgets are moral documents. They have used their budget bill as a way to do to hide from the people of Ontario. Speaker 3: People of Ontario aren't gonna know what's going on in their government, and it's not just for the premier's government. It's for all governments. It's for all parties. It's for all people working in the public service. Right? That's why we have those things so people know how the government is using the billions of dollars that they send them they send to government every year. Speaker 2: So the vote happened today as a result of the legislature taking another break tomorrow and all next week before returning. However, the Liberal Party has said at that point they plan on trying to introduce more motions to bring the FOI back to the surface to try and have more debate and can and see what more they can do to try and stop this from happening.
WallStreetApes
Posted - April 20, 2026 at 5:23 AM
Saved - April 21, 2026 at 5:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I say RFK Jr claims it wasn’t 400, but 500 hospices shut down in Los Angeles. He alleges none called to complain; 100% were fraud. These fake California hospices created fake addresses, then would approach poor neighborhoods and pay residents $600 flat-screen TVs in exchange for their patient IDs. They billed taxpayers thousands per patient, also paid for lists of patients, and began billing for them. Not a single California Democrat has been held accountable.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

RFK Jr says it wasn’t 400 hospices they shut down in Los Angeles, it was 500 He confirms not a single one has called to complain, 100% were fraud These fake California hospices made fake addresses, then would go to poor neighborhoods and buy residents $600 flat screen TVs, in exchange they would give them their patient identification These fraudulent hospice companies would then bill thousands of dollars to taxpayers for each one They would also pay for lists of patients too and begin billing for them Not a single California Democrat has been held accountable

Video Transcript AI Summary
We've shut down 500 hospices in Los Angeles. Incidentally, we haven't had one call from Congress or anybody else about complaining because clearly, these were fraudulent. A lot of these places, you'd say, they'd have, they were just invented addresses. They would obtain patient identification or they would pay people. They were going and giving people in poor neighborhoods flat screen televisions $600 and then they would enlist them and enroll them in the hospice and we were paying them $6,000.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've already shut down 500 hospices in Los Angeles. And and incidentally, we haven't had one call from congress or anybody else about complaining because clearly, these were fraudulent. A lot of these places, you'd say, they'd have, they were just invented addresses. They would obtain patient identification or they would pay people. They were going and giving people in poor neighborhoods flat screen televisions $600 and then they would enlist them and enroll them in the hospice and we were paying them $6,000.
WallStreetApes
Posted - April 18, 2026 at 2:15 AM
Saved - April 18, 2026 at 5:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Georgia Court of Appeals ruled for Sandersville Railroad, enabling a private eminent-domain seizure of family farmland—some held by Black families with roots dating to slavery—for a quarry spur. Families call it an abuse of government power for private gain and will take the case to the Supreme Court. A responder argues the decision amounts to a corporate takeover, says the use isn’t public, and warns descendants to take notice of possible SCOTUS involvement.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

The Georgia Court of Appeals just sided with Sandersville Railroad, giving the private company the power to take family farmland Land that has been with families since the civil war, including some Black families whose ancestors farmed the land dating back to slavery times must be given to the railroad Families and farmers say this is a ‘an abuse of eminent domain: a private company using government power to take land primarily for its own benefit’ They plan to fight it in the Supreme Court

@JLHunter1984 - J. L. Hunter

@WallStreetApes They didn’t just lose in court. They got railroaded by a fckin railroad. Eminent domain for a quarry spur isn’t public use...it's corporate takeover. Every farmer, every homeowner, every descendant of anyone who worked this soil just got put on notice. SCOTUS? You notice? 🇺🇸

WallStreetApes
Posted - April 16, 2026 at 12:52 AM
Saved - April 16, 2026 at 5:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that smoke detectors in bathrooms and public schools have built‑in microphones and sensors to monitor speech patterns, count occupants, and analyze aggression. They can be programmed to pick up keywords and could be configured to detect discussions about specific topics.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Smoke detectors in bathrooms and public schools are capable of monitoring speech patterns “These are sold for public safety, especially in education” The smoke detectors have built in microphones and censors that can tell how many people are in the room, analyzes the speech patterns to determine aggressive behavior They can by programmed to pick up key words Which means, they could be programmed to pick up someone talking about something specific…

WallStreetApes
Posted - April 14, 2026 at 4:44 AM
Saved - April 15, 2026 at 12:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I live 1.6 miles from the META Data Center in Wisconsin. My water system is destroyed. Discharge turns the Beaver Dam Creek white like milk; testing shows high heavy metals, including elevated strontium. For almost 50 years a natural creek on my horse farm, 20 feet wide and up to four feet deep, flowed through a connected groundwater system. Since upstream construction, it stops without rainfall and returns opaque with force, causing drastic erosion.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Woman who lives only 1.6 miles from the META Data Center in Wisconsin speaks out She says their water system has been completely destroyed She says there is discharge that turns the entire river white like milk. She paid for testing and found extremely high heavy metal levels “I live on a horse farm and I am an educator. I, for almost four 50 years, a natural creek has flowed through my property. It's 20 feet wide, up to four feet deep. It has persisted through drought, flood, seasonal change. It's part of a connected system. Groundwater, tributaries, watersheds, aquifers ultimately flowing into Beaver Dam Lake. Until construction began upstream on the data center, its behavior was stable and predictable After construction started, all of that changed. Here in Beaver Dam, the creek began to stop flowing entirely without rainfall. It would abruptly return off in cloudy and opaque like milk, with enough force to cause drastic erosion and damage — Water testing on my property shows elevated strontium, a very dangerous metal, and other indicators consistent with deep groundwater influence”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Miley Kaczynski, a lifelong Wisconsin resident living 1.6 miles downstream from the Meta Data Center in Beaver Dam, describes dramatic changes to a natural creek on her horse farm that have followed upstream construction. The creek, a 20-foot-wide, up-to-four-feet-deep waterway, had flowed reliably for decades as part of a connected system feeding into Beaver Dam Lake, until construction began upstream. Since then, the creek has stopped flowing even without rainfall, often returning only during brief wet periods, and when it does flow, it is sometimes cloudy and erodes the banks. This pattern has repeated dozens of times over a single construction season, leaving the creek dry half the time. Dust from construction covers her yard, turning grass white, and heavy dust plumes make her unable to see the hood of her truck while driving past the site. She notes this behavior is not consistent with natural variability or weather patterns and had never happened before. Kaczynski attempted to report these concerns to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), but found the system fragmented: reports are passed between departments and some are lost. She learned there is no single entity responsible for downstream impacts when large-scale construction disrupts a water system. Different permits govern activities locally, at the county and state levels, and some at the federal level. She emphasizes that this is a policy failure, not a failure of individual agency staff. She asserts that the law favors businesses over residents and that the creek’s flow appears correlated with upstream industrial activity, including daily blasting with dynamite during construction. When that discharge stops, the creek stops; when it resumes, water returns abruptly. Kaczynski highlights that corporations receive fast approvals and tax incentives with limited review, while residents must prove damage after the fact, at their own expense, against billion-dollar companies. She has spent significant time researching this issue (ten to twenty hours per week) and has faced high costs for water testing on her property (shipping a sample costs $121, with the test around $400 per test). Her property shows elevated strontium and other indicators consistent with deep groundwater influence, changes that coincide with upstream blasting and excavation, warranting independent investigation. If left unresolved, filters and additional testing could cost over $1,000, and her backyard footprint will be converted from permeable land to a paved industrial space of nearly 1,000 acres after construction. She explains the broader community impact: rural farmers and families cannot compete with corporate land purchases, leading to a loss of Wisconsin’s working landscapes as new projects fill in. A second data center is proposed in Beaver Dam. The city annexed land from her township, with Alliant Energy negotiating with farmers to sell collectively; once annexed by the city, rezoning proceeds to county oversight and is described as a rubber-stamp process. By the time residents learn it is a data center, it is too late to stop it. Township residents feel unrepresented—she lacks a representative at the city level, cannot legally prove damage before construction, and is left to navigate a system that she says is not prepared to protect residents. Kaczynski asks who will save her and others, noting that retroactive bills and a missing safety net leave them vulnerable. She ends by urging transparency and action, expressing gratitude for the hearing but lamenting that her full story has not been heard.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Miley Kaczynski and I live 1.6 miles downstream from the Meta Data Center in Beaver Dam. If you need to stand and stretch for a moment, do. I have never in my life needed a group of people to be more alert to what I have to say. Thank you for staying so long. I'm a lifelong Wisconsin resident. I live on a horse farm and I am an educator. For almost fifty years, a natural creek has flowed through my property. It's 20 feet wide, up to four feet deep. It has persisted through drought, flood, seasonal change. It's part of a connected system, brown water, tributaries, watersheds, aquifers, ultimately flowing into Beaver Dam Link. Until construction began upstream on the data center, its behavior was stable and predictable. After construction started, all of that changed here in Beaver Dam. The creek began to stop flowing entirely. Without rainfall, it would abruptly return, often cloudy and opaque like milk with enough force to cause drastic erosion and damage. This pattern repeated itself dozens of times over a single construction season to the point that it is dry half of the time. Dust from the construction covers my yard. My grass is white, and I'm 1.6 miles away. When I drive past it, I have to pull over because the dust cloud is so thick that I can't see of the hood of my truck. That behavior is not consistent with natural variability. It is not explained by weather patterns, and it has never happened before. So I did what residents are told to do. I called up the Department of Natural Resources. I spoke with dedicated staff, but the system is fragmented. My reports are passed between departments. Reports are lost. And at one point, I was told the agency didn't even know if they had clear authority over what was going on. What I learned in this process is there is no single entity responsible for what happens downstream when large scale construction disrupts a water system. Different permits govern different activities locally, county level, state level, some even federal. No one is tasked at looking at the whole picture or what happens beyond the project boundary. This is not a failure of individual agency staff. It's a policy failure. The law is on the side of the businesses and not on the residents. In my case, the creek's flow now appears correlated with industrial activity upstream in the times when that construction took place, including daily blasting with dynamite. When that discharge stops, my creek stops. When it resumes, water returns suddenly. Right now, corporates are receiving fast approval tax incentives, limited review, while residents are left to prove the damage after the fact at our own expense against billion dollar companies. This research has become my part time job. Ten to twenty hours a week I have spent since knowing it was a data center, trying to figure out what's happening to my land. Simply sending in a water sample from my property costs a $121 just to ship the sample. The cost of the test alone is going to be another $400 every time I have it tested. Water testing on my property shows elevated stronium, a very dangerous metal and other indicators consistent with deep groundwater influence. A change that coincides with large x scale excavation blasting upstream and warrants independent investigation. Filters on my water system to stop this, elevated metal, persistence in my water is going to be over $1,000. When construction is complete, nearly 1,000 acres of my backyard will be converted from living permeable land into a paved industrial space. Land that once actively recharge groundwater, aquifers, and watersheds. That change reshapes an entire community. Farmers and local families cannot compete with billion dollar corporations to pay for that land. And over time, the places that defined Wisconsin, rural communities, working landscapes, they're being replaced, and then the next project arrives to fill in that spot because nobody is building a home next to a data center. People are leaving. Now there's another open spot like a second data center now being proposed in Beaver Dam. The city annexed this land from my township. I was there at the meeting when they were talking to the farmers. Alliant Energy sent a representative in to broker the deal with all the farmers in the area. If we can find a a buyer for the whole shebang, well, you all sell at the same time. They had ten years to find a buyer. They knew exactly what they were doing, and they knew exactly who was going to buy that land, but we did not. Once it got annexed by the city, it goes to the county for rezoning. That is a rubber stamp in the process. There is nothing we can legally do to stop it at that point. Because you have to prove it is damage damaging to people's health. And we cannot legally prove damage. Before it's built. So it goes through. So you have to stop it at the city level if you want to speak up. But the city level proposed a conversation at their meeting about a tid, not about a data center. By the time we knew it was a data center, it was too late to do anything. And the residents of the township have to live now with the negative impacts of a data center that is on city properly property, and I'm not represented by the city. I don't have a representative to speak for me. I bought the property to have horses across from my childhood home. My parents live across the street with their horses. I wanted to be here forever. I can't even leave. I am trapped here because nobody wants to buy my land. They don't wanna be near a data center, and they don't want a 20 foot empty ditch in the front yard. I am concerned at the the idea that there does not seem to be a working, system in place to make sure that permits are being followed. We can issue them left and right. There's not enough staff. There is one mining permit officer in the DNR for the entire state of Wisconsin. There's a minor on that flag. We have one guy for the whole state to make sure people are doing what they're supposed to be doing in that particular area. There's not enough, and yes I nodded when the data center guy was up here because I agree that eight forty does not do enough, and he put his foot in his own mouth. He said we want to work with communities, then do it. Why do you need a bill to do it? Do it. Be transparent. And one thing I have not heard anyone, today share or talk up about is are these bills retroactive? Who is coming to save me? My safety net is gone. My my township cannot say no to being annexed by the city. My city doesn't represent me. And here I sit before you. I I'm counting on you. I need you. It's too late for me. I didn't get to vote no. I didn't get to speak up. I have two minutes at a public hearing at the city, and I am so grateful that you let us sit here so late tonight. Nobody has let me tell my whole story. Please, metaphorically, we are launching planes that are still being built, and we are forced to pilot them, and we don't know how to fly. Thank you for your time. Thank you for being here.
WallStreetApes
Posted - April 13, 2026 at 11:00 AM
Saved - April 13, 2026 at 5:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
WOAH. Just days before Rep Ayanna Pressley’s swearing-in, her husband quit a $92k job to start a consulting firm. Net worth with assets reportedly jumped to $8M. Every time you see a politician with a 'consulting firm' it’s taxpayer money laundering.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 JUST DAYS before Democrat Rep Ayanna Pressley was sworn into Congress, her husband quit a $92,000 a year job TO START A CONSULTING FIRM Net worth with assets skyrocketed to $8 million Every time you see a politician with a ‘consulting firm’ its taxpayer money laundering https://t.co/GeAQ4DeniI

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fox News reports allege wealth increases among prominent progressive lawmakers. The segment claims Ilhan Omar is worth up to $30,000,000, noting she rose from negative net worth when first elected to Congress to substantial wealth, with a husband who is a consultant. The piece centers on Ayanna Pressley, stating that when she was elected in 2018 she had a negative net worth, but today she is worth $1,300,000 with assets up to $8,000,000. It highlights property holdings in 2024: a Martha’s Vineyard rental worth up to $5,000,000 and multiple Boston rentals worth up to $1,000,000 each, contrasting with 2019 when she reportedly owned only one property in Boston. The report also notes that days before Pressley was sworn in, her husband left a $92,000-a-year Boston City Hall job to launch Conan Harris and Associates, a consulting firm. It states his income reportedly jumped while in Washington, with a client list including government organizations and one with deep ties to the Obama Foundation. The segment describes ethics concerns about using his city-issued email to pitch Walsh’s Chief of Staff on staying on as a consultant, while city officials say they did not solicit nor accept the offer and that ethics laws bar municipal employees from using official resources for personal gain. Pressed for comment, Pressley did not respond to Fox Business requests. Fox Business anchor David Asman appears to align with the report’s framing, acknowledging that wealth accumulation through government contacts is common but asserting questions arise about those who position themselves as anti-capitalist. David Asman contrasts the situation with what he describes as anti-capitalist squad members who denounce capitalism yet accumulate wealth, asserting that Pressley and her fellow squad members “condemn capitalism” while “she’s the one who’s been pillaging the government,” and noting her husband’s consulting income. The discussion broadens to Ilhan Omar, claimed to be worth up to $30,000,000, with a husband who is also a consultant and previously connected to progressive circles with alleged anti-capitalist leanings. The segment references Nancy Pelosi as part of a broader pattern, describing her as “the grand dam of all this,” and asserts she is worth about $275,000,000, with husband Paul Pelosi, suggesting insider information influenced certain trades tied to credit card companies. The speakers argue that such patterns illustrate long-standing issues, vowing continued investigation and pressure to stop perceived abuses. Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 close with remarks that this situation requires ongoing scrutiny, and they thank David Asman for the discussion.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a Fox News alert. It looks like Ilhan Omar isn't the only millionaire squad member. Our team dug into open secrets and financial disclosure reports. What we found is that when Ayanna Pressley was elected to Congress back in 2018, she had a negative net worth. You fast forward to today, she's worth $1,300,000 with assets worth up to 8,000,000. Now that's a massive increase in just six years, especially for someone on a $174,000 congressional salary. It's impressive, really. But how did she do it? Well, part of its property in 2024, Presley reported owning a Martha's Vineyard rental worth up to $5,000,000 as well as multiple Boston rentals worth up to $1,000,000 each. Now for context, back in 2019, she only reported owning one property in Boston. We're also learning days before Presley was sworn into Congress, her husband quit his $92,000 annual Boston City Hall job to start his own consulting firm called Conan Harris and Associates. And as we read more of the congresswoman's financial disclosure reports, we learned that her husband also saw his income jump while he was in Washington. His client list consists of some government organizations, including one with deep ties to the Obama Foundation. But as he started his firm and seek new clients, he faced ethics concerns because of Presley's job in Congress. As Harris's days dwindled in the city's Office of Public Safety, he used his city issued email account to pitch Walsh's Chief of Staff on staying on as a consultant. City officials say they did not solicit nor accept the offer, and state ethics laws bar municipal employees from knowingly using official resources for personal gain. Now we asked Presley for comment, and we even invited her on. She did not answer, but Fox Business anchor David Asman joins me now. He's been looking over this information, and David, there's nothing wrong with, you know, gaining financial resources. We see this a lot in congress, but there are questions. Speaker 1: Well, you go back to the 1930s, the last when movies began, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. I mean, it's happened for a long time. It happens in both the right and left, but what's so rich is that this is coming from anti capitalist squad members. Know? Yes. People who spent their life denigrating our capitalist system and saying how bad it was. In fact, congresswoman Presley came out with an ex post just a year ago. She and her fellow squad members, of course, constantly condemn capitalism, but she says Donald Trump and Musk want big banks and bad actors to run rampant and take people for a ride. They want to pillage the government and make themselves rich. Well, she's the one who's been pillaging the government. Now again, we're not suggesting she's going in and stealing funds or anything like that, but the fact is she got rich off of her contacts in government. Her husband got rich consulting with members of the business community and others, perhaps some people who were taking grants. That's, by the way, we saw that with Lee Zeldin, the EPA Commissioner. When he came in, he found out that right before Biden left office in December 2024, he was spending billions of dollars. A lot of that money was going directly to friends, you know, to acquaintances within the Democratic community that learned how to go in and write grants that would get accepted, making millions and millions of dollars each one of them. So, this has been going on for a while. I should mention that Presley's kind of a poor gal next to her friend Ilhan Omar. Yes. Because Ilhan Omar is worth up to $30,000,000 right now because, and she went from basically a flat to negative, if not negative point when she came into Congress. She also has a husband who's a consultant. He was working with progressive leftists who, again, have this anti capitalist creed which they live and die by, but apparently, they, it's very easy to condemn capitalism when you're making millions of dollars, And of course, we have to mention the grand dam of all this, which is Ms. Pelosi. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Speaker 1: Who's worth about $275,000,000 at least $275,000,000 with her husband Paul, who, and, you know, he's a good investor, but she's come to him, I'm sure, with excellent inside information that we're not allowed to trade on, but members of Congress still do, and there are certain trades that she and her husband made that clearly were based on information she was getting about credit card companies that were going to have a particular advantage that other companies didn't have. A lot of So this has got to stop. We've tried to stop it time and time again. Again, going back decades and decades, it never seems to work properly. Schweizer has done his best to try to try to come out with revealing stuff, but we're going to continue investigating and put pressure on the politicians to stop this once and for all. Speaker 0: David Asman, thank you. Lots of questions here.
WallStreetApes
Posted - April 11, 2026 at 3:37 AM
Saved - April 11, 2026 at 12:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m hearing new changes are coming to how Palantir will track Americans’ financial information. This AI-driven tool will score every taxpayer and generate ranked targets for audits, collections, or criminal investigations. There’s a lot more coming. This is horrifying.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

New changes are coming to how Palantir is going to start tracking Americans' financial information This new AI-driven tool will score every American taxpayer and generates ranked lists of targets for audits, collections, or criminal investigations But there’s a lot more coming too The is actually horrifying

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses recent changes in how Palantir is used to track Americans’ financial information and the potential impact on privacy, in the context of a legislative vote scheduled for the week of April 13. Key points: - Palantir’s Foundry platform, described as Palantir’s civilian platform, has been inside the IRS since 2017. It connects databases containing bank statements, IRS filings, and financial transactions to identify patterns for investigations. It has helped investigators by finding patterns they might miss. - The IRS has paid Palantir more than $200 million for this work. Historically, the use of Foundry was limited to cases that were already open, with investigators having a formal reason to look and an active investigation. - In December 2024, the IRS paid Palantir $1.8 million to build a tool called SNAP, standing for the selection and analytic platform. SNAP is described as taking the human out of the equation, scoring every American taxpayer and generating a ranked list of who the government should target next for audits, collections, and criminal investigations. - In the following months, the IRS paid Palantir an additional $2.25 million to expand SNAP. SNAP reportedly will pull transaction data from platforms like Venmo, Etsy, Depop, and Cash App. The threshold for reporting on these platforms reportedly dropped to $600 this year, expanding the scope of potentially flagged activities (including small-scale transactions such as selling a used couch or freelance dog walking). - There is concern about legality. In June 2025, ten members of Congress wrote to Palantir’s CEO suggesting the program likely violates the Privacy Act of 1974 and federal tax privacy laws, which limit tax information use to tax-related purposes. The IRS’s top lawyer reportedly agreed but was removed from the position two days after making that statement. - Two short-term actions are proposed: 1) Remove oneself from data broker databases to shrink the government’s data footprint, since it can access real-time location data, phone numbers, and spending habits through third-party data brokers without warrants. California residents can use privacy.california.gov/drop to send deletion requests to over 500 data brokers; the service is described as quick (about five minutes). Non-Californians can use services like Incogni or DeleteMe, with caveats about due diligence and potential fees. 2) Contact Rick Crawford, chair of the House Intelligence Committee, to push for warrant protections in FISA reauthorization. The vote is scheduled for the week of April 13. Crawford’s DC office number is (202) 225-4076, and the speaker demonstrates making a call to advocate for warrant requirements. The speaker emphasizes that if the legislation passes without protections, broader discussions about compliance and oversight will be necessary, and encourages viewers to begin by removing data footprints and calling Crawford.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There has been some really recent changes as to how Palantir is going to start tracking Americans' financial information. And I don't wanna scare anybody, but I do think that this is really important to talk about, especially right now because there's legislation that is being voted on next week on April 13, and we need to make sure that it doesn't pass without there being some protections in there for all of us. So what a lot of people I don't think realize is that Palantir's Foundry platform, which is their civilian platform, has been inside the IRS since 2017. And what it's done is connected all of these databases that contain your bank statements, your our IRS filings, your financial transactions, all of that stuff, and it would find patterns across it for investigate. If someone was suspected of, let's say, fraud, then Foundry could pull that someone's financial information and run an analysis over it and find patterns that maybe a human analyst might miss. And over the years, the IRS has paid Palantir more than $200,000,000 for that level of work. But there was always a caveat in that system, and that was the scope because that system was only to be used on cases that were already open, meaning that an investigator already had to suspect something was up, there had to be a formal filed investigation, and they had to have this reason to look. And then Foundry would then help them look faster. But something has changed recently that we need to talk about because in December 2024, the IRS had paid Palantir $1,800,000 to build a tool called SNAP, which stands for the selection and analytic platform. And, yes, that is SNAP, the same acronym as the food benefit program. So make of that what you will. What's dangerous about SNAP is that it takes the human out of the equation. So SNAP doesn't wait for an investigator to open a case on you or have a reason to look at you. The algorithm scores every American taxpayer and generates this ranked list of who the government should target next. And this is for audits, collections, for criminal investigations. I mean, truly, it is endless what they could flag you. And the reason I say recently is because even though this has been in development since December 2024, the IRS just last month paid Palantir another $2,250,000 to expand Snap further. And Snap doesn't just read your tax return either. According to this expansion, it's going to be able to pull transaction data from places like Venmo, Etsy, Depop, and Cash App. And this year, according to reports, the threshold for reporting on those platforms has dropped to $600. $600. So that's anyone who's selling a used couch on Facebook marketplace to a freelancer who walks dogs on the weekend. By the way, I got rid of Venmo, like, two years ago because I don't trust the PayPal mafia of it all. Like, knowing that Peter Thiel co founded PayPal and Palantir is a big enough red flag for them not to handle any of my transaction history. And that's gonna be a big one, so I recommend getting rid of that if I were you. Personally, I use Apple Pay because it's a little bit safer in that Apple doesn't keep a social feed of your transactions and has never given the government direct server access to those transactions. I mean, it's still subject to IRS reporting rules for businesses, but it's a lot cleaner than those other options. Is this even legal? Well, it's complicated, really, because in June 2025, 10 members of Congress did write to Palantir CEO and say that this likely violates the privacy act of 1974 and federal tax privacy laws, which says that your tax information cannot be used for anything unrelated to taxes, that it is a federal crime. And the IRS's top lawyer did agree with that, but he was swiftly removed from his position two days after saying that on the record in 2025. Now there are two things you can do about this right now, both of which are short term fixes, but it'll at least give you something to do so you're not just a puddle of anxiety. The first thing is going to be to remove yourself from all data broker databases. Because like I said, the government is not just using IRS data. They are going to be using your real time location data, your phone number, and any spending habits that they find through social media or any third party data broker that they can buy it from. Because buying that information does not require a warrant, and that is how they get around the court system. So you can shrink that footprint. I can only speak to California because that's where I live, so each state is gonna have its own rules on how to do this. But if you live in California, then you can go to privacy.california.gov/drop. And I'll insert a video here of what you're supposed to do while you're there. Basically, it's a free website that's run by the state. It's one form. It sends deletion request to over 500 data brokers and databases across The US at once, and it takes all of five minutes. It's definitely worth it. I just did it this morning. If you're not in California, you could look at services like Incogni or DeleteMe. Full disclosure, I'm not sponsored by them. I've never worked with them. I've never used their platform. So do your due diligence. But from what I understand, it's the same thing with a small fee attached. Now the next thing you can do is call Rick Crawford this week. Now I'm not kidding around. This is the most important thing every single one of you should be doing. Okay? Crawford is the House Intelligence Committee chair, and he controls whether FISA reauthorization goes to vote with or without any warrant protections. The vote is scheduled for the week of April 13. That is next week. That is a few days away. So everybody needs to call him right now or tomorrow. K? His DC office number is (202) 225-4076. You don't have to be from Arkansas. Any American can call him. In fact, I'm gonna call him right now and show you how to do it. Okay? Because I know it can be scary sometimes. I'm gonna have to put you guys on my computer screen. One sec. Speaker 1: Thank you for calling the office of congressman Rick Crawford. I'm sorry we could not answer your call. If you'd like to leave an opinion for the congressman, please give us your name, the county you are calling from, and a brief message. If you are in need of assistance, please give us your name, an email address, or a phone number, and a brief message detailing the issue you need help with, and we will get back to you as soon as possible. Thank you, and have a wonderful day. Speaker 0: Hi. My name is Audrey Henson, and I'm calling to request that chairman Crawford add warrant requirements to the FISA authorization before it goes to the floor. I just don't think that the fourth amendment should have loopholes like this in it, and the government should not be able to buy data from third parties. So please be on the right side of history with this. This is going to affect you and your family too. Thank you. I'm not good at that. Now, if legislation doesn't pass with protections, if the government thinks that they can keep building a system with no oversight and no public vote, then we need to have a much bigger conversation about what compliance means when the system that you're complying with is being used against you, if you're picking up what I'm putting down. But that is a bigger conversation with pretty big consequences, and nobody should be having that conversation alone. So the first step is to do just what I did, and and call his office and try to delete your data, and we'll start there. And we'll see what next week brings.
WallStreetApes
Posted - March 31, 2026 at 3:27 AM
Saved - March 31, 2026 at 5:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim Muslims are practicing Sharia in Plano, Texas. A Muslim at East Plano Islamic Center is with his underage wife, and the investigator says he has three more underage wives at home, insisting, “It’s already happening right here in Plano.”

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

American says Muslims are already practicing Sharia Law in Plano, Texas A Muslim is seen at the East Plano Islamic Center with his very underage wife Investigator says he has 3 more underage wives at home “She is his wife. Yes, his wife. Please spare me your denials of Sharia law could never happen in America because it's already happening right here in Plano. And this is all over. He's got three more little wives at home too, by the way.”

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 30, 2026 at 5:44 AM
Saved - March 31, 2026 at 4:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Ayaan Hirsi Ali warns of a planned Islamic takeover in the U.S., citing Dawah manuals and mosques funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar to promote a hostile belief system. She says Muslims infiltrate government, media, education, and family; establishing student associations to islamize institutions, with the same strategy for government and media. She argues discussing political Islam is taboo and Islamophobia invented, equating dissent with bigotry.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Member of the House of Representatives of the Netherlands, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, warns America of the planned Islamic takeover She says there are actual manuals that were created by Muslim leaders to take over the United States, and they’re being followed “The establishment of mosques of Islamic centers that are paid for by governments like Saudi Arabia and Qatar to promote, assist a belief system that is hostile and that is designed to replace the existing our American system. — It is gradual. It is a match through the systems, through government, through the media, through education, through the family. And I'm not making these things up. — You can access all this information. You can get these Dawah manuals and just read for yourself how they set out their strategies, get into campuses, establish Muslim student associations. The Muslim student associations, they're given tools and tactics and to islamize that particular institution. And it's the same for government, the same for media. And it's working. It's working because right now you cannot discuss political Islam. It's been made a taboo, a time Islamophobia has been invented. That makes you, especially — a white man, it, it uses your own vulnerabilities against you because the minute you start to question their goals, their objectives, you're not having a conversation about those particular facts. We are going to have a conversation about you are bigotry”

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 29, 2026 at 3:54 PM
Saved - March 29, 2026 at 9:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that California election fraud is exposed in Riverside county’s Prop 50 redistricting: nearly 50,000 votes created. Handwritten logs show 611,428 ballots received; certified total to the SOS was 657,322. About 45,896 votes (~7%) added without explanation. Sheriff seized over 650,000 ballots for a hand count. AG Bonta calls warrants unprecedented and legally deficient. Democrats are rigging our elections.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

California Election Fraud has been officially exposed. A ballot discrepancy was found in Riverside county for the Prop 50 redistricting Nearly 50,000 votes in just one county seem to have been created out of thin air - Handwritten logs from the Registrar of Voters show 611,428 ballots received - The official certified total reported to the Secretary of State was 657,322 votes - 45,896 votes roughly 7% of the county total were allegedly added without any explanation Sheriff Chad Bianco launched a criminal investigation and obtained court-issued search warrants and seized over 650,000 ballots from the Registrar’s office to conduct his own hand count Democrat California Attorney General Rob Bonta calls this move “unprecedented” and “legally deficient,” arguing the warrants lacked probable cause of a specific crime Democrats are rigging our elections

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ramin begins by noting that California said 657,000 people voted in Riverside County on Prop 50, but the registrar’s handwritten logs show 611,000 ballots came through the door—a gap of 45,896 ballots. He adds that a sheriff, sworn in with a badge and a court-issued warrant, says he’ll count those ballots himself, and the California attorney general “loses his mind” over the idea of stopping someone from counting paper. Speaker 1 clarifies the numbers: the registrar of voters’ logs show 611,428 ballots cast, while 657,322 votes were reported and certified to the secretary of state, a difference of 45,896 votes. Ramin uses a simple analogy to illustrate the discrepancy: if you squeeze 20 lemons and sell cups all afternoon, but someone later claims 28 cups were sold, eight cups exceed the supply. He says this is the gist of Riverside’s situation: 611,000 ballots entered, 657,000 votes certified, and a 45,896-vote gap, which he calls unacceptable. He emphasizes that this is not a local school board vote, but Gavin Newsom’s Prop 50, officially called the Election Rigging Response Act. Prop 50 gave Sacramento the power to overturn California’s independent redistricting commission and redraw all 52 congressional districts to benefit Democrats, with maps crafted by Democratic operatives and in effect through 2030. It passed statewide 64% to 36, with over 8,000,000 votes cast. Ramin notes that while the phantom Riverside votes did not flip the statewide result, the point is about potential partisan impact: Republicans currently hold the House by six seats, and California’s new maps are designed to flip five of those seats. He mentions representatives Kevin Kiley and Darrell Issa as examples of Republicans in districts that were redrawn to become more favorable to Democrats. If Democrats flip those seats in November 2026, they would take back the House. Buried within the election that made all of this possible is the 45,000-vote gap in a single county. He extrapolates: if Riverside County’s 7% turnout were representative of all 8,000,000 statewide votes, that could imply over 500,000 “ghost votes.” He explicitly says he is not asserting that this happened and that nobody knows, because no… (the excerpt ends abruptly).
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So California just told you that 657,000 people voted in Riverside County on prop 50. But the guy whose actual job it was to count those ballots, register our voters, his own handwritten logs say 611,000 ballots came through the door. That's a difference of 45,896 votes just gone or maybe just appeared. Nobody knows. Now here's where it gets good. A sheriff, an actual sheriff with a badge and a gun and a court issued warrant signed by a judge says, I'm gonna go count those ballots myself. And the California attorney general loses his mind. Why would you try to stop someone from counting paper? I'm Ramin. Let's dig in. Speaker 1: This investigation is very simple. The registrar of voters maintained handwritten logs of the total number of ballots coming into the ROV. An audit of those logs received from the Riverside County registrar of voters allegedly shows six eleven thousand four hundred and twenty eight ballots were cast, but six fifty seven thousand three twenty two votes were reported and certified to the secretary of state. That is a difference of forty five thousand eight ninety six votes. Speaker 0: So let me break this down like you're seven years old running a lemonade stand. Your mom gives you 20 lemons. You squeeze every single one. You sell cups all afternoon. At the end of the day, someone tells you you sold 28 cups of lemonade, but you only had 20 lemons. Where the other eight cups come from? And that's it. That's the whole story. That's what's happening in Riverside County right now. 611,000 ballots walked through the door. 657,000 votes got certified in Sacramento. And the people responsible for that 45,000 gap are saying, hey, trust us. It's fine. It's with unacceptable errors. Acceptable errors in an election for a ballot measure that redrew California's entire congressional map. I want you to remember that phrase, acceptable error. We're gonna come back to it in a second. Now let me give you the actual number. 45,896 votes. That's not a rounding error. That's not acceptable error. That's the population of a small city. That's a stadium full of people showing up without ballots. Because here's what people are missing. This wasn't some local school board vote. This was Gavin Newsom's baby. Prop 50 officially called the election rigging response act. This gave Sacramento the power to throw out California's independent redistricting commission and redraw all 52 congressional districts to benefit Democrats. Maps redrawn by Democratic operatives operatives in effect through 2030. It passed statewide 64% to 36%. Over 8,000,000 votes cast. So, yeah, the phantom votes at Riverside didn't flip the statewide result, but that's not the point. The point is this, Republicans currently hold the house by six seats. Six. California's new maps are designed to flip five of those seats. Reps like Kevin Kiley, Darrell Issa, guys in redrawn districts that just got a lot bluer overnight. Now if Democrats flip those seats in November 2026, they take back the house. And buried inside the election that made all of that possible, 45,000 votes that nobody can explain in one county. Now extrapolate. If Riverside County is 7% fan of vote rate existed across all 8,000,000 statewide votes, that's over 500,000 ghost votes, half a million. I'm not saying that happened. Nobody knows. Because no
WallStreetApes
Posted - March 27, 2026 at 2:11 AM
Saved - March 29, 2026 at 10:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m told Humboldt County uses grainy satellite images to identify unpermitted structures and then bills homeowners up to $12,000 a day, with liens as high as $900,000, risking tax sales. The county claims environmental protection, but residents say the Environmental Response Team targets cannabis sites to push people into legality and meet quotas. How is this different from mob rule?

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

California Democrats are using satellite images to find structures on residents properties, like a shed that wasn’t authorized to be built, and then sending them bills for as much as $12,000 per day One family received a notice the would have a $900,000 lien out on their home from the county How is one California county using cannabis and grainy satellite images to extort millions from homeowners? This is Doug and Kareen Thomas — They moved to Humboldt County after their home burned down in the L.A County wildfires, and 6 days later, their dream property turned into a nightmare. The county said a letter saying this barn was built without a permit, and prior owners did use it for growing weed. So they had 10 days to demo the barn or face fines of $12,000 per day. And ignoring the letter would result in a $900,000 lien placed on their property, which could then be sold at a tax sale. — How is this possible? Well, Humboldt County is part of the Emerald Triangle. For decades, it's been a hotspot for OG growers. And after California went legal, the county wanted its cut. So they created an environmental response team to supposedly protect a sensitive ecosystem. In reality, it was used to weed out black market growers and incentivize them into the legal industry. They'd use old grainy satellite images to look for unpermitted development, like barns, greenhouses, grading, and even the removal of too many trees, because those things must mean you're growing weed. However, in Humboldt, people have developed property and lived off the land without permits for generations. But the county didn't care. They had a quota to me, 50 permit violations a week. — How are Humboldt County's actions any different than mob rule?”

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 26, 2026 at 7:45 PM
Saved - March 27, 2026 at 5:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I observe private equity firms buying classic American chains like Carl’s Jr., Sonic, Arby’s, Buffalo Wild Wings, Jimmy John’s, Baskin-Robbins, Dunkin’, Auntie Anne’s, Subway, and more. They consolidate to cut labor, install their own operators, extract fees, and maximize profits, supposedly driving down quality while raising prices. They claim this is only the tip of the iceberg.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Private equity firms are buying classic American food restaurants and destroying the quality and raising prices Popular places now owned by private equity firms Carl’s Jr. Sonic Arby’s Buffalo Wild Wings Jimmy John’s Baskin-Robbins Dunkin’ Auntie Anne’s Moe’s Southwest Grill Jamba Carvel Schlotzsky’s McAlister’s Deli Cinnabon Hardee’s Miller’s Ale House Jim ’N Nick’s Community Bar-B-Q Subway “They've all been bought out by private equity firms. If you've noticed, the quality at food chains keeps getting worse while the prices increase. This is why — Private equity has been busy consolidating restaurants to cut labor, install their own operators, extract fees, and maximize profits” “This is only the tip of the iceberg”

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 26, 2026 at 3:16 PM
Saved - March 27, 2026 at 2:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
There were 10 seconds cut from Mark Cook’s testimony before the Georgia House; the recovered audio claims, “Democrats are rigging our elections with electronic voting machines.”

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

RECOVERED 🚨 There was 10 seconds that were cut from Election Expert Mark Cook’s witness testimony in front of the Georgia House of Representatives Very conveniently they cut out 10 seconds right in the middle of his sentence But the original audio has been recovered: Democrats are rigging our elections with electronic voting machines

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Cook, an election cybersecurity subject matter expert in threat assessment and common sense mitigation, introduces himself: he’s been working on elections nonstop for about six years and has forty years of IT industry experience. He states that he has evidence he hopes to show that there are backdoors built into electronic voting systems that allow flipping, changing of votes. He references a demonstration clip, saying, “backdoors built in to electronic voting systems that allow flipping, changing of votes,” and notes that the testing labs miss this, leaving the systems blindly certified and supposedly safe. He highlights audio he believes was clipped from a recording, insisting that the content shows voting systems are vulnerable: “that allow flipping, changing of votes,” and that testing labs are blind to these issues. He says, “I can demonstrate this to you even while I'm still here in this building.” Cook argues that there is a lack of government transparency, claiming, “the testing labs all miss this, then they're blindly certified, and then we're told, it's shut down our throats, that everything is safe and secure.” He describes the entire system as “built on a pyramid of lies,” and asserts that it must be stopped. He offers to educate and show problems, insisting he can do so, but emphasizes the need for a common-sense approach. He emphasizes practicality and accessibility, arguing that the problem can be solved with straightforward methods: “We're literally filling dots out on paper. We're counting the dots, adding the dots up, and whoever has the most dots wins.” He calls for a change that keeps elections under the control of the people and avoids simply “kicking the can down the road.” He reiterates that the resolution is not complicated and frames the solution as a simple, transparent counting method using paper records rather than electronic manipulation. In summary, Cook asserts the existence of covert backdoors in electronic voting systems, criticizes testing labs for blindly certifying these systems, condemns what he calls a “pyramid of lies,” and advocates a return to a basic, paper-driven, dot-counting approach where the person with the most dots wins, to restore public control over elections. He offers to provide demonstrations and education to support this view.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You. I appreciate it. My name is Mark Cook. I'm an election cybersecurity subject matter expert in threat assessment and common sense mitigation. I've been working on elections solid nonstop for about six years now. Thank you. I have been working in the IT industry for forty years. I have intrinsic knowledge that would be really important for people to understand. I have evidence right here that I was hoping to show you that can show there are absolutely I know you guys have heard this, but I've got the proof right here. Backdoors built in to electronic voting systems that allow flipping, changing of votes. So the testing labs What? Wow. Did you see that? I can't believe they did that. Did you hear that? Yep. Watch it again and pay attention to the time in the upper right corner. That allow flipping, changing of votes. So the testing labs Can you believe that? Yes. So much for government transparency, I guess. Well, how about we just put that audio right back where they clipped it out so everyone can hear it. Enjoy. That allow flipping, changing of votes Infiltrating the system, all built in, set up in a way that makes it easy and untraceable. I can demonstrate this to you even while I'm still here in this building. I'm happy to do so. The testing labs all miss this, then they're blindly certified, and then we're told, it's shut down our throats, that everything is safe and secure. It's absolutely not. We're being lied to from the very top. The whole thing is built on a pyramid of lies, and we have to stop living these lies. I will educate you. I can show you guys the problems. No issue. I'm happy to do so. But we have to approach this in a common sense form here. We have to be smart about what we're doing. If we're gonna make a change, we need make a change that's actually gonna solve the problem and not kick the can down the road and, again, take the control of elections away from where elections belong, which is in the people's hands. Yep. And this is not complicated to solve. We're literally filling dots out on paper. We're counting the dots, adding the dots up, and whoever has the most dots wins. That
WallStreetApes
Posted - March 25, 2026 at 1:00 AM
Saved - March 25, 2026 at 12:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I heard an audio clip claiming Fauci discussed making vaccination hard to obtain so people drop their beliefs. He supposedly said schools and colleges will require vaccines, and big employers like Amazon and Facebook will demand them to hire. He claimed once people feel empowered and legally protected, they’ll lose their ideological resistance and get vaccinated.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Uncovered audio shows Anthony Fauci talking about having every major corporation require vaccinations and making it as hard as possible on citizens so they’re forced to be vaccinated He says if you make it hard enough on people, they’ll abandon their beliefs This is Evil “Once people feel empowered and protected legally, you are gonna have schools, universities and colleges are gonna say, you wanna come to this college buddy? You're gonna get vaccinated, lady. You're gonna get vaccinated. Big corporations like Amazon and Facebook and all of those others are gonna say, you wanna work for us to get vaccinate. And it's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit. And they get vaccinated.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the exchange, Speaker 1 advocates that a solution to vaccination uptake may require some form of mandatory vaccination, noting that federal officials resist that term. Speaker 2 adds that once people feel legally empowered, educational institutions will require vaccination, with colleges, universities, and employers like Amazon and Facebook signaling that anyone wanting to study or work there must be vaccinated. He asserts that making life difficult for people will cause them to drop ideological objections and get vaccinated. Speaker 0 challenges whether all objections to COVID vaccinations are “ideological bullshit,” insisting that is not what was being referred to and arguing that the claim about making it hard for people to live was made in a broader context about education, travel, work, and overall life, and that she takes offense at the interpretation. Speaker 0 then references Miss Allison Williams, who testified before the committee about losing her job after seeking an exemption from ESPN’s vaccine mandate. Williams’ case involved recommendations from bureaucrats and a fertility expert, highlighting that she and her husband, who were pursuing pregnancy with medical guidance, should not have been forced to vaccinate. Speaker 0 contends she was fired because “you made it hard” as described in the statement, preventing her from working, living, and making health decisions with her healthcare professional, thereby impacting American society’s ability to flourish and self-determine certain rights—stating that America should take offense at this. The dialogue shifts to Doctor Fauci. The speaker addresses him directly, calling him “doctor of fear” and stating that Americans do not hate science but hate having their freedoms taken. The speaker accuses Fauci of inspiring and creating fear through mass mandates, school closures, and vaccine mandates, claiming these policies have destroyed the American people’s trust in public health institutions and will have ripple effects for generations. It is asserted that fear has manifested in areas such as education and the economy, and the speaker concludes by separating their stance from science, saying, “I disagree with you because I disagree with fear.” The exchange ends with Speaker 0 yielding.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In an interview that you gave as part of an audiobook written by Michael Spector, that you believed an institutional should make it hard for people to to live their lives. It so they'd feel pressured to get vaccinated. Could we re re, run the audio clip on that, please? Speaker 1: Do you think can be done about it? I have to say that I don't see a big solution other than some sort of mandatory vaccination. I know federal officials don't like Speaker 2: to use that term. Once people feel empowered and protected legally, you are gonna have schools, universities, and colleges are gonna say, you wanna come to this college, buddy? You're gonna get vaccinated. Lady, you're gonna get vaccinated. Yeah. Big corporations like Amazon and Facebook and and and all of those others are gonna say, you wanna work for us? You get vaccinated. And it's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit, and they get vaccinated. Speaker 0: Thank you. Are all objections to COVID vaccinations ideological bullshit, doctor Pauci? No. They're not. And that's Speaker 2: not what I was referring Speaker 0: to. Well, in reference to making it hard for people to get education, traveling, working, I'd say it very much was in context. And I take great offense to this. Miss Allison Williams testified before this committee about losing her job because she sought an exemption for ESPN's vaccine mandate, came from recommendation from bureaucrats like yourself. She and her husband were actively working with a fertility expert, a physician on how to get pregnant and agreed with the premise that she was young, healthy, wanted to get pregnant, and shouldn't get the vaccination for medical purposes. But she was fired because you made it hard just like you said in your statement because you didn't wanna make sure that the ideological bullshit got in the way of her working, of living her life, of making a medical decision with her health care professional. I think America should take great offense to this. That's exactly what you meant when you said making it hard for people to live without getting a vaccination. You affected people's ability to work, travel, be educated, to actually flourish in American society, to self determine as well given God given rights. Shame on you. Doctor. Fauci, you've become doctor of fear. Americans do not hate science. I don't hate science. The American people hate having their freedoms taken from them. You inspired and created fear through mass mandates, school closures, vaccine mandates that have destroyed the American people's trust in our public health institutions. This fear you created will continue to have ripple effects over generations to come. You have already seen its effects in education, in the economy, and everything else. Quite frankly, you said, if you agree if you disagree with me, you disagree with science. Doctor Fauci, I disagree with you because I disagree with fear. And with that, I yield.
WallStreetApes
Posted - March 21, 2026 at 11:28 PM
Saved - March 22, 2026 at 3:06 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is INSANE “Redacted CIA documents from the Biden administration, they identified motherhood and homemaking as indicators of white racially and ethnically motivated violent extremism” “They don't just hate women, they hate white women specifically” https://t.co/3xW44R1Hnw

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 15, 2026 at 1:30 PM
Saved - March 15, 2026 at 4:00 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is genius A video was made in the style of Disney that explains Sharia Law This makes Islam and Sharia Law easy to understand for everyone of all ages https://t.co/sVf4NqkTFR

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 10, 2026 at 2:12 AM
Saved - March 10, 2026 at 2:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I grew up Muslim and studied the Qur'an for years. In this clip I say the audience missed what was said because it was in Arabic. It quotes Surah 9:5, “the sword,” often called the verse of the sword, about fighting until submission and paying jizya. I question symbolism, context, and how religious texts are used in modern politics, asking if people would stay silent for another faith.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Woman who grew up as a Muslim exposes we all missed what was said at the mosque Zohran Mamdani gave his speech at when he got elected mayor of New York City She says we all missed it because it was in Arabic They called to kill all the infidels (us) “Listen very carefully to the verse that is being recited here: (She shows the footage, it really happened) ‘Oh, the killing of the infidels by the sword’ For context, I grew up Muslim. I studied the Qur'an in Islam for years. I wore hijab, my head, and the verse that you just heard is from the Qur'an. It's Surah nine verse five, and it's often referred to by many scholars as the verse of the sword. I mean, this guy kind of has no shame. — This verse speaks about fighting opposing groups until they submit to a political authority and pay a tax that's called the jizya, and the jizya is meant to subdue and humiliate them. All of this, of course, raises a much larger question about symbolism context and how historical religious texts are viewed in modern political spaces. Let's just be honest for a second. If any other religion recited wartime scripture while a politician was present, would people stay silent about it?“

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 8, 2026 at 3:14 PM
Saved - March 8, 2026 at 9:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note claims that lab-grown chocolate hits shelves in 2027, with Oreo, Cadbury, and Toblerone funding Israeli biotech because labs are cheaper than farms. I’m told Cadbury Dairy Milk uses vegetable fats alongside cocoa butter in many markets, with standards allowing up to 5% non-cocoa fats; U.S. rules are laxer for milk chocolate. The post also mentions an exposer flagging cadmium trace levels and ultra-processing warnings.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

I verified this and it’s true “Lab-grown chocolate is coming to shelves in 2027. Oreo, Cadbury and Toblerone are already funding the Israeli biotech producing it because a lab is cheaper than a farm” “Cadbury has been quietly replacing your chocolate — This dairy milk isn't legal chocolate in 27 countries, the cocoa butter was replaced with vegetable fat, a cheap blend of 6 industrial oils. What remains is diluted with polyglycerol — Soon even that gets replaced, you'll be eating cells grown in a pharmaceutical tank” Cadbury Dairy Milk (in the UK and many markets) has included vegetable fats (like palm and shea) alongside cocoa butter for years. UK/EU regulations allow up to 5% non-cocoa vegetable fats in chocolate if it meets minimum cocoa solids (20%) and other standards. In America standards are much lower - For milk chocolate specifically: Only 10% chocolate liquor, 12% milk solids, and 3.39% milk fat are required “Exposer flagged lead in cadmium traces with an ultra processing warning”

WallStreetApes
Posted - March 4, 2026 at 12:00 PM
Saved - March 4, 2026 at 1:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned, via FOIA, that Democrats funded groups paying for voter registrations, with claims that in 2020 the registrations were fake and covered up. The investigation found bags of prepaid voting cards, burner phones, and iPads. GBI Strategies allegedly ran temporary facilities across states, producing thousands of fake registrations, including 10,000 in Michigan, and another 2,500 the next day, with FBI involvement. Muskegon alone had over 10,000 fake registrations; guns with silencers were also found. Democrats and the media said the election was 100% secure, yet FOIA exposed otherwise.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 Freedom of Information Act request reveals Democrats are paying companies to provide voter registrations, and in the 2020 election THEY WERE FAKE and covered up Police investigated and found bags of prepaid voting cards, burner phones, iPads used for the operation. It was covered up - A Democrat funded organization called GBI Strategies setup temporary facilities in multiple states and produced fake voter registrations - 10,000 voter registration forms from a single individual with GBI strategies in Swing State Michigan - The same woman returned the next day with another 2,500 voter registration applications - Police investigated and found bags of prepaid voting cards, burner phones, iPads used for the operation - The case was involved a multi-state operation; the FBI took over, suspecting interstate activity - Over 10,000 fake voter registrations found just in Muskegon, Michigan - All these fake voter registrations can still be on voter rolls - According to the Michigan State Police report obtained via FOIA guns equipped with silencers were found during the investigation Democrats and the media said the election was 100% secure, yet it took a Freedom of Information Act to get this information

WallStreetApes
Posted - February 26, 2026 at 5:14 AM
Saved - February 28, 2026 at 12:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that the Florida Department of Health tested 46 top candy brands, finding 28 with unsafe arsenic levels. They claim chronic exposure raises cancer risk and other neurological issues. The post lists safe annual piece limits by candy, e.g., Black Forest Gummy Bears 16, Laffy Taffy 4, Nerds 96, Sweet Tart Originals 48, Hershey’s Cookies and Cream 1.5 bars, etc.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is INSANE “This is how many pieces of your child's favorite candy they can consume per year before they surpass their safe level of arsenic intake:” Black Forest Gummy Bears - 16 pieces per year Laffy Taffys - 4 pieces per year Trolli Sour Gummy Worms - 12 pieces per year Hershey’s Cookies and Cream bars - 1.5 bars per year Jolly Ranchers -6 per year Kit Kats -4 per year Twizzlers Strawberry - 4 per year Twizzlers Cherry - 8 per year Nerds - 96 pieces per year (This is less than one mini box) Nerds Gummy Clusters - 24 pieces per year Sweet Tart Originals - 48 pieces per year Sweet Tart Ropes - 3 per year This is based on new Florida guidelines, not the paid off FDA ‘The Florida Department of Health recently tested 46 top candy brands and found that 28 contained unsafe levels of arsenic. Chronic exposure to high arsenic levels can cause increased cancer risk, cognitive decline, behavioral and neurological disorders, neuromotor dysfunction, and affects your nervous system.’

WallStreetApes
Posted - February 26, 2026 at 2:00 PM
Saved - February 27, 2026 at 7:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim 8,000 pages show Fulton County DA Fani Willis colluding with the Justice Department, the January 6 Democrats, and the Biden White House. Biden's White House allegedly waived Trump's executive privilege; the Justice Department supposedly approved a two-week request to mobilize federal workers to aid a state case against a federal figure. The fix was in. Democrats and everyone involved should be rotting in prison. This is treason.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Lawsuit reveals 8,000 pages of documents showing Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis “colluded with the Justice Department, with the January 6th Democrats and the Biden White House” “Joe Biden's White House said, we'll waive Donald Trump's executive privilege for you” “The Justice Department said, we'll waive and approve your two-week request, which are requests to get federal workers to help you build a state case against a federal or national figure. The fix was in” Democrats and everyone involved should be rotting in prison. This is treason

Video Transcript AI Summary
Just the News reports a story based on thousands of pages of documents obtained over years with the help of America First Legal, focusing on Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her prosecution of a state case against Donald Trump that mirrored the federal case led by Jack Smith. The documents, they say, show that Willis was in deep collusion with the Justice Department, with the January 6 Democrats, and with the Biden White House. The claim is that the Biden White House said it would waive Donald Trump’s executive privilege for Willis, and the Justice Department said it would waive and approve Willis’s 2E requests to obtain federal workers to help build a case against a national figure at the state level. The report asserts the “fix was in” and that this constitutes the strongest evidence to date of coordinated action to pursue Trump across jurisdictions. The asserted significance is that the Democrats intentionally and strategically created a double jeopardy, double drain machine to go after Trump, potentially infringing civil liberties by pursuing prosecutions in multiple venues for the same or related conduct. The narrative claims this involved the Biden White House, the Biden DOJ, and the January 6 Democrats pressing Willis to create a system where Trump could be targeted in more than one place, a scenario described as a “double jeopardy, double drain.” The report suggests this development is now focused in Miami and anticipates further disclosures. Looking ahead, the program teases next steps: tomorrow they plan to reveal whether there was a financial incentive or “financial follow the money” stream to Willis tied to her pursuit. They note that if this pattern occurred in Georgia, there are similar election cases in Wisconsin and Arizona, raising questions about federal taxpayers funding state efforts to smear Trump and create multi-state double jeopardy scenarios. The discussion frames these elements as part of a conspiracy case beginning to unfold in Miami. Upcoming segments are promised to include new election integrity revelations from figures like Tulsi Gabbard, Kash Patel, and Pam Bondi. These revelations are expected to concern intrusions and issues targeting the 2026 election, with the aim of informing Senate members—potentially swaying those on the fence about the Save or related measures. The program signals that these developments will be explored in upcoming appearances, including guests such as Barry Loudermilk.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You've got, some breaking news and stories you're bringing up at Justin News. Give us just give us the you're the Pathfinder. Tell us what's dropping and what's about to drop. Speaker 1: What we have just a few minutes ago and put up on Justin News is a story, that we got thousands of pages of documents we had to sue for multiple years with the help of America First Legal to get Fonny Willis to finally cough up. What did they show? They show that Fonny Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney who brought the first state case against Donald Trump that mirrored or mimicked the Jack Smith case against President Trump, was in deep collusion with the Justice Department, with, the January 6 Democrats and the Biden White House. Yep. Joe Biden's White House said, we'll waive Donald Trump's executive privilege for you. The Justice Department said, we'll waive and approve your 2E request, which are requests to, get federal workers to help you build a, state case against a federal or national figure. The fix was in. And why is this important? Because this is the best proof we've had to date. These documents, 8,000 pages, everybody should go read them. They're up at Just the News. They show that the Democrats intentionally and strategically created a double jeopardy, double drain machine to go after Donald Trump, potentially another violation of the civil liberties of Donald Trump and his followers who were prosecuted and pursued after the twenty twenty election. We have double jeopardy. We're protected from being prosecuted for the same crimes in two places, except in this case you see the Biden Justice Department, the Biden White House, and the January 6 Democrats trying to push Fonny Willis to create a double jeopardy, double drain situation for Donald Trump. That's not what we do in America. If you're a patriot, if you're a patriot, you might do that. This is day one. Tomorrow, we're going to show people whether there was a financial incentive, financial reward, a financial follow the money stream to Fonny Willis that comes in as she's pursuing this. And you can assume that if it happened in Georgia, well, we have similar election cases now in Wisconsin and Arizona. The next question will be for the Justice Department, for the FBI, for the congressional investigators like Barry Loudermilk, who's coming on my show tonight. Did it happen in those states? Was this so orchestrated that federal taxpayers were funding the state, efforts to smear Donald Trump to create double jeopardy, double drain situations in multiple states. It will become part of the conspiracy case. It is now working out of Miami. That's what's happening. Next week, I think we'll get our first taste of some of the new election integrity revelations that people like Tulsi Gabbard and Kash Patel and Pam Bondi have been working on. We'll learn of some new intrusions and some things that should concern us and that we can fix with the twenty twenty six election. I think it's the sort of stuff that will wise up some senators who might be on the fence on They the Save might get a little smarter when they hear these next revelations, probably next week.
WallStreetApes
Posted - February 25, 2026 at 5:45 AM
Saved - February 25, 2026 at 10:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I spent my career at the CIA and NSA. I looked into why Charlie Kirk might have ordered an audit into Turning Point USA just before he was assassinated. Three consulting firms were funded by TPUSA, all owned by a single TPUSA Director.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This woman worked her entire career at the CIA and NSA She says she looked into why Charlie Kirk might have ordered an audit into Turning Point USA right before he was assassinated 3 consulting firms were being funneled money from TPUSA, all 3 were owned by 1 Director at TPUSA https://t.co/EviP7z9Q6m

WallStreetApes
Posted - February 24, 2026 at 3:15 PM
Saved - February 24, 2026 at 4:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
There’s an epidemic of sexual abuse in the state. Our firm alone has identified over 360 perpetrator teachers in California—just in California? Correct, and we know there are many more; we certainly don’t have all the cases.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

🚨 Just one law firm has identified 360 teachers that are sexual predators in California “There is an epidemic of sexual abuse in the state — Our firm alone has discovered over 360 perpetrator teachers” “Just in California?” “Correct, and we believe there's many, many more. We know there's many more. 'cause we certainly don't have all of the cases.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker identifies the main issue in the California public school system (K-12) as an epidemic of sexual abuse by teachers, coaches, and other school employees. The speaker notes that it wasn’t until 2012 that a victim could file a civil lawsuit for damages in California. Since then, the speaker’s firm has filed dozens of such lawsuits. The firm states that it alone has discovered over three fifty or three sixty perpetrators, teachers. The speaker confirms there are many more perpetrators beyond those identified by the firm because the firm does not have all of the cases.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's the issue in the California Public School System K-twelve? The main issue is that there is an epidemic of sexual abuse in the state. The by teachers, by coaches, and by other school employees. It wasn't until 2012, you could actually file a lawsuit, a civil lawsuit for damages as a victim of sexual abuse in California. And since then, our firm alone has filed dozens. Our firm alone has discovered over three fifty or three sixty perpetrators, teachers. Wait, three fifty, three sixty? Just in California? Correct. And we believe there's many, many more. We know there's many more because we certainly don't have all of the cases.
WallStreetApes
Posted - February 20, 2026 at 12:00 PM
Saved - February 20, 2026 at 3:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reported to California authorities that nearly 700 freight companies are tied to one quiet Signal Hill address near Long Beach, with about 500 listing the same email. It looks like the perfect cover for fake trucking firms, and the money laundering never stops in California.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

700 companies are headquartered at one address in a small building in Los Angeles County, California This was reported to California authorities and you guessed it, nothing was done Money laundering “Take a look at this quiet building in Signal Hill, California. Doesn't look like the headquarters of hundreds of trucking companies right? But federal records show nearly 700 freight companies tied to this single address. Roughly 500 of those companies list the same email.” This would be the perfect place to put fake trucking companies in Los Angeles County because Signal Hill is right next to Long Beach, California. Long Beach is the 2nd largest container port in America The money laundering never stops in California

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 highlights a quiet building in Signal Hill, California, that seems unlikely to be the headquarters for hundreds of trucking companies. Federal records reportedly show nearly 700 freight companies tied to this single address, with roughly 500 of those companies listing the same email: WTF FMCSA@AOL.com. The segment notes that CRAX reported this exact address to federal regulators two years ago, and asks, "Because if we all know about it and we reported it, why is something not being done?"
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Take a look at this quiet building in Signal Hill, California. Doesn't look like the headquarters of hundreds of trucking companies. Right? But federal records show nearly 700 freight companies tied to this single address. Roughly 500 of those companies list the same email. WTF FMCSA@AOL.com. How ridiculous and absurd is this? CRAX reported this exact address to federal regulators two years ago. Because if we all know about it and we reported it, why is something not being done?
WallStreetApes
Posted - February 18, 2026 at 1:01 AM
Saved - February 18, 2026 at 4:07 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 Journalist went undercover at the New York City Board of Elections posing as a non citizen BOARD OF ELECTIONS ADMITS TO REGISTERING ILLEGALS TO VOTE The say they won’t report illegals registering "We accept anything that comes over the counter” https://t.co/9iAS4uuWNl

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video documents an undercover-style investigation at the New York City Board of Elections on the 10th Floor at 200 Varick Street, focusing on whether noncitizens can register to vote. Speaker 0 plans to pose as a noncitizen Canadian green-card holder and attempts to engage a staffer about voter registration. In the first encounter, Speaker 2 tells Speaker 1 that “Everything you fill out, you’re swearing an affidavit that everything you’re putting down is true,” and notes that “you gotta be a citizen to fill it out.” Speaker 1 identifies as “a green card holder from Canada.” The staffer initially signals uncertainty about whether to fill out the form, saying, “I wouldn’t fill it out,” but also suggests the possibility that noncitizens have previously registered. Speaker 0 observes that the staffer does not state it would be illegal to complete the application as a noncitizen, only that the staffer “doesn’t recommend it.” The conversation reveals that the staffer acknowledges noncitizens have registered before: “We have people who come in here and they have legal situations and they registered, they weren’t a citizen, boom boom boom.” The staffer also admits that they “can’t stop you from submitting the application,” and that there is generally no full background check; “we can’t do our background check on you. We just collect it. That’s it.” Speaker 2 reinforces that the staff’s role is to collect and submit, not to verify citizenship, stating, “we accept anything that comes over the counter,” and reiterating that “if it comes back to you, it comes back to… If it doesn’t, it doesn’t.” When Speaker 1 asks if they will report the noncitizen, the staffer responds, “No. No. No. I’m not… that’s not my job to report anyone. My job is just to collect the application and put it and submit it to the department.” Speaker 0 cites New York election law—“Under New York election law, section seventeen one zero six, any election officer who willfully violates any provision of the election law relative to the registration of electors is guilty of a felony”—to argue that processing a noncitizen registration would be a criminal offense. After leaving the office, the pair return to request more information, but the staffer becomes suspicious, consults a coworker, and then refuses to accept their application. The video notes that, according to the staff, “we get registrations come to the mail. We, you know, we whatever comes through, we accept and then it’s submitted,” and emphasizes the absence of ID or proof of citizenship requirements at registration, solely requiring an affidavit asserting citizenship. The segment concludes by highlighting concerns about potential threats to electoral integrity, asserting that there is no requirement to show ID or documentation to register, and that all that is required is signing an affidavit claiming American citizenship.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It seemed like before you were about to accept my voter registration form even though I told you I was a green card holder. Speaker 1: I'm just a green card holder. Like, so you're not gonna report me if Speaker 2: I do this because I No. No. No. We accept anything that comes over the counter. You know, we have people who come in here and they have legal situations and they register, they weren't a citizen, boom boom boom. So Speaker 0: How often do things like that happen? Right now, I'm in front of 200 Varick Street in New York City, New York. And inside this building on the 10th Floor is an office of the New York City Board of Elections. Now, I'm gonna go in there and I'm going to pose as a non citizen Canadian green card holder. Speaker 1: I'm a green card holder from Canada. Speaker 0: And I'm just gonna see how far I can get in the voter registration process. So let's see what happens. So Speaker 1: I talked to a gentleman before and he said he could help me with registering to vote. Yeah. It's my first time. So what do I have to show you guys? Speaker 2: Everything you fill out, you're swearing an affidavit that everything you're putting down is true, and that's it. Cabo seat filling out. Speaker 1: Oh, got it. Okay. Alright. I'm a green card holder from Canada. Speaker 2: Okay. Yeah. You gotta be a citizen. I I wouldn't wouldn't fill it out. Speaker 1: You wouldn't fill it out? Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, you gotta be a citizen to fill it out. Speaker 0: Notice that he doesn't tell me it would be illegal to complete the application as noncitizen. Only that he doesn't recommend it. From here, things get even more concerning. Speaker 1: The reason why somebody somebody told me that they were a green card holder and that they came in and then they submitted and they were good. Speaker 2: We can't stop you from submitting the application and if it goes through, but most likely because they don't do like a full background check, but once in a while, you know, we have people who come in here and they have legal situations and they registered, they weren't a citizen, boom, boom, boom. So Speaker 0: This is a direct admission that non citizens are in fact registering to vote. Something that many claim is a conspiracy theory. Speaker 1: Alright. Here's the deal. To be honest with you, I'm like, I'm really against everything that's going on right now and I'm trying to do my part. So like, do you mind if I fill this out or is it okay with you? Speaker 2: Up to you. That's right. I can't tell you what to do. You wanna fill that, fill it out. But everything is clear clearly stated, especially at this bottom, it says American citizens. You know, if you fill that out and you're not, you know, if it comes back to you, it comes back to If it doesn't, it doesn't. Speaker 1: But but you But but Speaker 2: we accept anything that comes over the counter, you know. Speaker 1: But you're you're not gonna report me or something like that? Speaker 2: No. No. No. I'm not no. We don't report anyone. Whoever fills that application out comes to us. Speaker 1: But I'm just a green card holder. Like, I don't wanna get so you're not gonna report me if I do this because Speaker 2: I No. No. No. I'm not no. I'm not that's not my job to report anyone. My job is just to collect the application and put it and submit it to the department. Speaker 0: Under New York election law, section seventeen one zero six, any election officer who willfully violates any provision of the election law relative to the registration of electors is guilty of a felony. It would be a criminal offense for this worker to process my voter registration after I admitted to being a noncitizen. Speaker 1: Can I take this with me? Is that okay? Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. Take one of these. Yeah. You can take that or, you know, take them out. Mhmm. Speaker 1: Okay. But just to be clear, if I if I do do this, you will be able submit it for me. Not a problem. Speaker 2: Yeah. We'll submit it. That's you know, because we we can't do our background check on you. We just collect it. That's it. Speaker 1: That's Okay. Speaker 2: I mean, we're going off your work. I mean, you check off because at the top, we'll ask you, you know, are you a citizen or not? You know, you just check yes or you check no. You know, we get up with we get registrations come to the mail. We, you know, we whatever comes through, we we accept and then it's it's submitted. Speaker 0: We walked out of the office and ultimately didn't submit any application, as doing so would be illegal. We later returned to try to get more information from this worker. However, when we did so, he seemed to get suspicious of us and consulted a coworker. He then changed his tune and refused to accept our application. Despite this, it seems from our first interaction that this worker was willing to accept my voter registration application when I initially claimed that I was not a US citizen. How many non citizen voter registration applications has this worker or his coworkers accepted? Why did he suggest he would process my application? We asked him ourselves. Here's what he had to say. This is the gentleman who was about to accept my voter registration form the first time we went in when I said that I was just a green card holder. Here he is now. He doesn't want to atone for what happened. You mentioned to me that you've had situations where non citizens have registered to vote. Can you tell me more about that? Speaker 2: Can you Speaker 0: tell me a little more about that? It seemed like before you were about to accept my voter registration form even though I told you I was a green card holder. How often do things like that happen? I just wanna know, so you were about to accept my voter registration form the first time until upper level management got involved. How many, if any, non citizen voter registration forms do you guys process? How often does that happen? Because it seemed to me like you were about to accept my form. Can I get an idea of how commonplace this is? Are you concerned about the integrity of our elections? Can we get your name? Can you tell us any information? Because we're pretty concerned. Can we ask you a couple questions, man? Come on. You're just gonna do us like that? This is not a good look. So this is the situation out here. In New York City, at these centers where voter registration applications are taken in and processed, there is no requirement to show a ID or social security or any sort of proof of identification. Nothing like that. All you have to do is sign an affidavit that states that you are an American citizen and that is it. You don't have to bring any sort of documentation to corroborate that fact. This is one of the many potential threats to our electoral system here in The United States Of America. Hi.
WallStreetApes
Posted - February 18, 2026 at 1:01 AM
Saved - February 18, 2026 at 4:03 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 Journalist went undercover at the New York City Board of Elections posing as a non citizen BOARD OF ELECTIONS ADMITS TO REGISTERING ILLEGALS TO VOTE The say they won’t report illegals registering "We accept anything that comes over the counter” https://t.co/9iAS4uuWNl

WallStreetApes
Posted - February 17, 2026 at 12:00 PM
Saved - February 18, 2026 at 7:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note 38,000 ballots arrived at 3:45 a.m. after Election Day in Michigan (2020). I allege over 100% turnout, 40,000 voters registered two days before, 100,000+ mismatched poll-book votes, and names on processed ballots not matching electronic records. I claim 17,327 dead voters, blocked poll challengers, nameless ballots, impossible birth years, backdated entries with fake dates, and up to 120% turnout.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 38,000 ballots arrived at 3:45 a.m. after Election Day in Michigan during the 2020 election - OVER 100% VOTER TURNOUT - 40,000 voters registered to vote 2 DAYS BEFORE the election - Over 100,000 votes “mismatched” in poll books - NONE of the names on processed ballots were found in the regular electronic poll books - 17,327 dead people voted, verified with Michigan online obituaries - Poll challengers were not allowed to continue legal duties - Ballots with no attached names - Ballots with impossible details, like a person born in 1921 but supposedly registered to vote in 1900 (21 years before birth) - Ballots observed being backdated from November 4 to November 2, with poll workers entering data, including fake dates - As much as a 120% voter turnout (clear voter fraud)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Key points from the testimonies: - There is a contention that ballots were run through the counting process multiple times, possibly thousands, with Speaker 0 noting statements that ballots could have been counted up to 30,000 times. When examining the poll book and comparing it to the votes cast, it is asked whether the numbers would align with the total votes from Detroit. - Speaker 2 asserts that the poll book is "completely off," with Speaker 3 estimating an error of over 100,000 in the poll book. A Downriver resident explains arriving at 3:40 a.m. due to 38,000 ballots that were “ride here” and “sitting over there and getting counted,” framing this as an eye-opening revelation about hypocrisy. - Security measures are described as unusual: Speaker 3 notes that windows are being taped up so challengers cannot see in, or out, raising questions about transparency. - Speaker 4 describes observing that none of the names on ballots were being scanned from the ballots into electronic poll books; instead, names appeared only on supplemental sheets. They note electronic poll books were updated on Sunday, November 1, implying that thousands of new ballots would have had to be registered on November 2 or 3. The speaker began writing down names after ballots were scanned but was obstructed by five individuals, including a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and a top ABCB leader, according to their affidavit. The speaker questions whether 30,000 to 40,000 new voters could have been legally signed up in two days. - Speaker 5 reports ballots that do not belong to anybody and do not appear in voter registration. They describe ballots with no names attached and note attempts to reevaluate them by placing them in a box. Multiple ballots show several different numbers. - Speaker 6 explains that, on the tables, ballots are accompanied by a computer screen showing which ballot it is. Sometimes a ballot has no name, but the registration file shows a person born in 1921 registered long before that year (1900), suggesting anomalies. The speaker asks what is wrong with being born in 1921, while Speaker 5 emphasizes a registration dating to 1900. - Speaker 7 lists egregious items: not allowed to perform duties, GOP challengers obstructed, procedures not followed, backdating ballots from November 4 to November 2, and data entered into computers for mail-in ballots with dates of birth like 01/01/1900, absent from electronic poll books or paper supplement books prior to that. They claim dead people were voting and reference a list of 17,327 Michigan voters over 80 who voted in 2020 and were found in obituaries online. This speaker calls the election described as the most important in their lifetime and in the republic’s history. - Representative Johnson is also mentioned, with a prompt to question the turnout rate, hinting at a purported turnout of 120%. Overall, the testimonies allege discrepancies between poll books and ballots, improper registration, backdated or misdated ballots, ballots lacking identifying information, obstructions to challengers, and possible participation of non-existent or deceased voters, culminating in claims of a highly irregular election process.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If these ballots were run through multiple times, as you've always I think you said possibly up to 30,000 times, definitely thousands of times Mhmm. Being counted. When we examine the poll book and see who voted and we count those numbers Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Would they then not line up with the total number of votes coming out of Detroit? Speaker 2: Just later. Later. The the poll the poll book is completely off. Completely off. Speaker 0: Off. That poll thousand? Speaker 3: I'd say that poll book is off by over a 100,000. Speaker 2: Where are you from? Oh, I'm from Downriver. Okay. I'm here because of the 38,000 ballots that ride here at 03:40AM that are just now sitting over there and getting counted Okay. Supposedly. Okay. And that's why I arrived Okay. To an eye opening of hypocrisy. Let me tell you. Speaker 3: Something I want you to see, they're taping up the windows. Security's taping up taping up the windows so that people who are challenging cannot see in here and and he can't see out. So it's an interesting development. Interesting development. Speaker 4: I began observing the process of ballots at several counting boards. I quickly noticed that none, and I mean none, of the names were being scanned from the ballots were in the electronic poll books. All of the names that were found were found in the supplemental sheets. We know that the poll books, the electronic poll books, were updated on Sunday, November 1. That meant that all of these new ballots had to have been brand new registered voters on Monday, November 2, or Tuesday, November 3. I found it very hard to believe that tens of thousands of people had registered in just two short days. So I began writing down the names on the ballots immediately after they were scanned by the computer poll worker. As soon as I began, I was severely obstructed by five different persons that I could no longer such that I could no longer continue my legal responsibility as a poll challenger. These five persons comprised of a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and one of the top leaders of the ABCB. The details can be found on my affidavit. Does anyone believe that 30 or 40,000 new voters were actually signed up legally in two days? Speaker 5: Yeah. And what have you seen? I've seen ballots that don't belong to anybody. They don't show up in the voter registration. There's no name attached to them. Speaker 6: And what are they doing with those ballots? Speaker 5: They I'm challenging them. They're supposed to put them in a box to be then reevaluated. But then multiple ballots that have several different numbers. Okay. One person with different numbers. We have full list of them. We're writing everything down all day long. Speaker 6: So are they improperly filled out Speaker 5: and you're looking to disqualify them? They're improperly filled out if they have no name, if they don't have a home, or if the person was born in 1921 but registered to vote in 1900, that kind of doesn't make sense. So but that's not on the ballot. Speaker 6: When you vote, your ballot is just the balls in which you have on there. What are you seeing? Are you seeing people's registration forms? Yes. Speaker 5: We are. So on the tables, Speaker 6: you have the ballot, and then you are able to see next to them Speaker 5: On a computer screen. A computer screen whose ballot that is. Sometimes, say, the ballot itself has no name, but the ballot is filled out. Okay. And then if we go into the registration file, we find the person that has been I mean, was born in 1921, and it's just a lot of there's a lot that's not right. Speaker 6: What's wrong with being born in 1921? Speaker 5: But registering to vote in nineteen nineteen hundred, twenty one years before you're born. Speaker 7: Following are only a few of the most egregious items witnessed, I was not allowed to perform my job and from what I observed were any of the GOP challengers in accordance with Michigan laws. We were constantly prevented from getting close enough to see what was going on with respect to the ballots. Procedures were not being properly followed when we brought these to the attention of the supervisors, our concerns were dismissed and ignored. We observed ballots being backdated from eleven point four to eleven point two and data being entered into the computers for these mail in ballots. Poll workers were entering ballot information from new mail in ballots including dates of birth of 01/01/1900 into the electronic poll books and processing those ballots for tabulation. The information was not entered wasn't in either the electronic poll book or the paper supplement book prior to that. Dead people were voting. I sent a website to that effect, and the list that they had up to that date was 17,327 randomly checked Michigan voters that were registered for voting and were above the age of 80. Every name on this list has voted in the twenty twenty election, check for yourself, and has also been found in one or more of the obituaries online. This is the most important election in my lifetime and I think the most important election in the history of our republic. Speaker 1: That poll book? Why don't you look Speaker 6: at the registered voters on there? How many registered voters are on there? Did you do you even know the answer to that? Speaker 0: No. I guess it's I'm trying to get to the bottom of Speaker 3: this here. Speaker 6: Zero. There's zero. Speaker 0: So my question then is if the Speaker 1: Guess how many wait. What about what about how what what what about the turnout rate? A 120%? Speaker 0: Let's let's let representative Johnson ask his classic question.
WallStreetApes
Posted - February 16, 2026 at 3:15 AM
Saved - February 16, 2026 at 12:19 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

American Pharmacy Worker gives a behind the scenes look at our healthcare system He shows a medication costs less than $4 to dispense Since the patient has insurance, the insurance company makes them charge $97 US Health Insurance companies should be prosecuted https://t.co/f05nj8IlPJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses frustration over a price discrepancy in a prescription transaction. The core facts cited are: a medication that costs $4 to dispense, when billed to the insurance, results in the patient being charged $97.06. Speaker 0 repeats the puzzling situation: “We have a claim for a prescription that costs less than $4. The insurance wants to charge the patient $97.” The concern is the patient’s likely reaction: they will be yelled at and blame CVS for the high price set by their insurance, even though the dispensing cost is described as less than $4. Speaker 0 highlights the misalignment between the pharmacy’s dispensing cost and the amount the patient is asked to pay after insurance processing, indicating a breakdown in the expected pricing flow from the pharmacy to insurance to patient. The dialogue underscores the emotional and reputational pressure on the pharmacy staff when patients perceive the price as excessive, regardless of where the markup originates. The closing sentiment, “Love you CVS,” signals a mixture of familiarity and exasperation with the CVS system or process involved in this pricing scenario, though the exact sentiment toward CVS is not elaborated beyond that line.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. Come here. Tell me how this makes sense. We have a medication that costs $4 to dispense. You bill to the insurance, and they wanna charge the patient $97.06 Say that again? We have a claim for a prescription that costs less than $4 The insurance wants to charge the patient $97 So what are we gonna do? We're gonna get yelled at by the patient. And they're gonna blame us for their insurance charging them that price saying we made it that price. Love you CVS.
WallStreetApes
Posted - February 13, 2026 at 12:00 PM
Saved - February 13, 2026 at 3:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reference a memo claiming the FBI planned for January 6th months in advance, including embedding informants and mass arrests of conservatives, and that a Boston tabletop exercise occurred in Aug 2020. Kash Patel turned the memos over to Congress at Chairman Loudermilk’s request. The memos allegedly show the FBI anticipated a contested election and proposed strategies—informants in volatile groups and mass prosecutions—to hurt conservatives, not liberals.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 New memo reveals the FBI planned for January 6th MONTHS IN ADVANCE They planned to plant informants in this crowd and PLANNED MASS ARRESTS OF CONSERVATIVES They literally KNEW it would be rigged because they only planned arrests for conservatives, not liberals “They had a tabletop exercise that they ran in Boston in August of 2020, five months before January 6th occurred.” “The memos, which Kash Patel just turned over to Congress, he just found them recently, turned them over to Congress at the request of Chairman Barry Loudermilk. Who's in charge of the J6 investigation now in the House, showed that the FBI knew there was a strong possibility of a hanging election or a contested election — they even devised very specific strategies. -One of them is to embed informants inside the groups where the most likely political violence or political agitation might occur - The second thing they recommended was mass prosecutions, even for the most minor of crimes, exactly what the FBI did after January 6th. Now, there are two big things about that strategy. It's pretty clear the strategy was hatched months before and that's what they carried out — The FBI, knowing something was going to happen, implementing a strategy that hurt conservatives but not liberals”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion outlines that a year before January 6, the FBI conducted a planning exercise and had specific plans for the event. Speaker 1 states there was a tabletop exercise run in Boston in August 2020, five months before January 6. The memos that Kash Patel turned over to Congress, recently provided at the request of Chairman Barry Lautomilk, show that the FBI knew there was a strong possibility of a hanging or contested election, with both sides agitated and likely to escalate to violence. The memos also reveal that the FBI devised specific strategies, including embedding informants inside groups where political violence or agitation might occur. According to Speaker 1, the FBI had two dozen informants on the ground on the morning of January 6, and recommended mass prosecutions, even for the most minor crimes—described as exactly what the FBI did after January 6. Speaker 1 emphasizes two major points about the strategy: first, that the strategy was conceived months in advance and was carried out; second, that it represented a double standard because it differed from how political violence at BLM protests and far-left actions in 2020 were handled. The claim is that informants were embedded in both left- and right-wing groups, including Antifa and right-wing groups, and that intelligence suggested a bad episode would occur. They allege that, according to Chairman Barry Lautemux, warnings from informants were strong, but Capitol stakeholders in Washington, DC, did not receive those warnings or pass them along. This, they argue, shows two failed examples of the FBI under the Chris Ray era, with foreknowledge of events but actions that hurt conservatives while not alerting liberals or those who could have prevented violence. The documents are presented as now public, described as stunning by the speakers. Regarding whether there was any briefing to higher-level officials, Speaker 0 asks if there is evidence that Bill Barr, Chris Ray, or staff at the White House were briefed after the tabletop exercise and plan development. Speaker 1 responds that there is no indication of briefing the attorney general or other senior officials. There is no documentation showing that Barr, the Homeland Security Department, the Capitol Police, or the Washington, DC Metropolitan Police were alerted. The speaker notes that this suggests an insular FBI operation, drawing a comparison to pre-nine-eleven dynamics, implying systemic issues within the FBI.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me get this correct. A year before January 6, the FBI knew there might be some consternation about the election given everything given the Democrats already war gaming it. They thought this thing through, and they actually had plans specifically for January 6, sir? Speaker 1: Yeah, they did. They had a tabletop exercise that they ran in Boston in August 2020, five months before January 6 occurred. The memos, which Kash Patel just turned over to Congress, he just found them recently, turned them over to Congress at the request of Chairman Barry Lautomilk, who's in charge of the J-six investigation now in the House, show that the FBI knew there was a strong possibility of a hanging election or a contested election, that both sides appeared to be agitated and likely would, it could likely carry out that agitation to the point of violence. And they even devised very specific strategies. And one of them is to embed informants inside the groups where the most likely political violence or political agitation might occur. That is something that the FBI did. We had two dozen informants on the ground on the morning of January 6. The second thing they recommended was mass prosecutions, even for the most minor of crimes. Exactly what the FBI did after January 6. Now, there are two big things about that strategy. It's pretty clear the strategy was hatched months before and that's what they carried out. It's not the strategy they use for the political violence at BLM and the far left conducted all throughout the 2020. So a very clear double standard. The second thing is they did embed informants in a lot of groups, including left and right groups, Antifa and right wing groups. And they got lots of intelligence suggesting a bad episode would occur. We now know from Chairman Barry Lautemux that that while those warnings were very strong from the informants, the preparations of the warnings from the FBI to the brethren of the Capitol in Washington DC did not exist. They didn't pass on the warnings from the informants. So two failed examples of the Chris era of the FBI. Knowing something was going to happen, implementing a strategy that hurt conservatives but not liberals and not warning the people who could actually prevent the violence from occurring. That is the legacy of the Chris Ray FBI. It's what we now have on open. These documents are now out there for everybody to see. Pretty stunning, though maybe not so stunning given what we've learned about the FBI. Speaker 0: Is there any part of this that shows that they briefed that Bill Barr and Chris Ray briefed the president of The United States or briefed his staff or briefed senior people at the White House after the tabletop exercise and after they came up with a plan of how to get informants, is there any evidence at all that people that should have known about this were actually informed about it? Speaker 1: No, it doesn't look like the attorney general knew Bill Barr or the brass, at least not as of now. There's no documentation showing that. There's no mention of it in the documents even suggesting that we alert the Attorney General or the Homeland Security Department or the Capitol Police or the Washington DC Metropolitan Police. So it looks like the insular sort of pillared FBI existed again. These are the same diseases that affected the FBI before nineeleven and you're starting to see the same thing.
WallStreetApes
Posted - February 9, 2026 at 11:55 PM
Saved - February 10, 2026 at 11:27 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Amelie Zilber tells her 6.4 million followers she is so horrified by what she’s reading in the new Jeffrey Epstein files she’s having a hard time sleeping She believes we are all severely “under reacting” to what we are learning and should be DEMANDING accountability https://t.co/mnOHctTlPC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses extreme alarm about revelations described as “coming out from these vials” and questions whether everyone is paying attention to what is being revealed. They fear they may have to explain to others what they are hearing and seeing, and worry they will sound like they are experiencing psychosis because they cannot sleep and feel “so fucking angry.” They declare they are “petrified” and describe the material as “some of the most vile, most demonic shit I have ever even fathomed” and “unfathomable.” They feel that people are not paying attention and that there is under reaction to these distressing revelations. They worry that, when exposed to such distressing information, people may become numb, a response they acknowledge as a valid human experience, but they believe it is unacceptable in this context: “we numb ourselves and we block it out because it's too much.” They speculate about others who are reading or observing the revelations, asking if “these fucking fucked up freaks” are sitting there laughing and saying that “everything's out and nothing's gonna happen,” noting that “we got away with the most horrifying stuff” and insisting that it’s “not even humanly possible to believe that this is happening.” The speaker repeats their inability to wrap their mind around “the fact that these things happened,” labeling it “unconscionable.” They ask, “what the fuck are we supposed to do? Genuinely, what the fuck are we supposed to do?”, conveying a sense of urgent seeking for guidance or action in response to the perceived revelations and their emotional impact.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are we all seeing what's being revealed? Are we all paying attention to the things that are coming out from these vials? Because I'm worried that I'm going to have to try and explain to somebody what I'm hearing and seeing, and I'm going to sound like I'm experiencing psychosis because I feel like I'm experiencing psychosis. I don't I can't even sleep. I'm so fucking angry. I'm petrified. This is some of the most vile, most demonic shit I have ever even fathomed. Like, it is unfathomable. And I feel like people are not paying attention. I feel like we are under reacting. I feel like I'm very worried that when we are exposed to such distressing information, like, are being overloaded with the most appalling news ever that we numb. We numb ourselves and we block it out because it's too much, which is like a totally valid human experience and thing to do. But, like, we cannot do that. We cannot do that because, like, are these fucking fucked up freaks, like, sitting there laughing, being like, well, everything's out and nothing's gonna happen and, like, look, we got away with it. And, like, we got away with the most horrifying stuff that like, it's not even humanly possible to believe that this is happening. Like, I I literally cannot wrap my mind around the fact that these things happened. It is unconscionable. And, like, what the fuck are we supposed to do? Genuinely, what the fuck are we supposed to do?
WallStreetApes
Posted - January 11, 2026 at 12:00 PM
Saved - February 9, 2026 at 2:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that the Office of the Legislative Auditor found Minnesota Democrats did no site visits for nearly $200 million in annual grants to addiction and mental health providers. When asked for evidence, they allegedly created fake documents and backdated them. The OLA called this egregious—records didn’t exist, then appeared, some backdated two years. The BHA failed to ensure providers did the work; no site visits were conducted.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

The Office of the Legislative Auditor reveals Minnesota Democrats have done NO SITE VISITS for $200 million dollars worth of grants PER YEAR to addiction and mental health service providers When they asked for evidence, Democrats just created fake documents and then backdated them to pretend they had records “This was definitely the most egregious thing I have seen, maybe in my whole time working at OLA — Office of the Legislative Auditor released a damning report finding state employees fabricating records to cover up mismanagement of money, tax money. — So these documents should exist. They didn't. We asked for them. All of a sudden, they now exist. And in at least one case, it was created wholesale and backdated by two years to give the impression that it had always been there and been done on time” “The OLA audited the Behavioral Health Administration within the Department of Human Services, which issues grants nearly $200 million of taxpayer money each year to addiction and mental health service providers. But the audit found BHA was not making sure those providers were doing the work. BHA didn't conduct the site visits”

WallStreetApes
Posted - February 4, 2026 at 12:00 PM
Saved - February 4, 2026 at 6:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report claims that a protest organizer posted paid protest jobs: $3,500–$4,200 a month for about 20 hours weekly. Nate Friedman says Ehrenkranz recruits nationwide (Chicago, Bay Area, Baltimore) for a nine-week, part-time contract paying $3,400 in stipends biweekly. It also alleges ActBlue funnels billions to groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, which pays protesters and has drawn $7.6 million from the Open Society Foundation, funded by Soros.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

EXPOSED 🚨 A protest organizer has been caught posting paid job positions to protest “Here's him posting on LinkedIn to hire paid protesters — Compensation is $3,500 to $4,200 a month for an average of 20 hours a week” Multiple major American cities hiring protesters Nate Friedman “Naftali Ehrenkranz is recruiting nationwide in Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore. Now let's see what happens when we click on one of these links attached. It's a nine week contract part time paying $3,400 in stipends issued biweekly” “ActBlue has funneled billions of dollars for activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, who is orchestrating the resistance on ICE agents in Minneapolis. Indivisible has been caught paying protesters, and they've received over $7.6 million from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros”

Video Transcript AI Summary
A journalist engages with a person at a park, aiming to speak to someone, and the conversation shifts to a narrative about Naftali Aaron Kranz. The speaker identifies Kranz as a paid protester through GetFree, detailing LinkedIn evidence of the arrangement. GetFree is described as hiring for part-time mobilization support contractors, seeking individuals with four or more years of experience in leading direct action, large-scale mobilizations, demonstrations, protests, and civil disobedience (the latter implying experience with arrests). Compensation is stated as 3,500 to 4,200 dollars per month for an average of twenty hours a week. GetFree brands itself as a grassroots organization, but Kranz and others are described as being paid to protest. The narrator asserts Kranz’s role in celebrating vandalism, citing an incident in Crown Heights where someone threw an egg at a stranger’s Cybertruck and dog feces were placed on it, describing Kranz as part of this sentiment. They place Kranz at an abolish-the-police rally, noting he was blending in with other recruits rather than leading, with the implication that field photos can be staged for later use. The claim is made that Kranz works with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), and the narrator reports meeting him again at a DSA Tax the Rich rally. LinkedIn activity is cited to show Kranz frequently posting about recruitment and expanding efforts to win reparations nationwide, with mentions of Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore. A linked link is described as listing a nine-week contract, part-time, paying 3,400 dollars in stipends biweekly, seeking someone excited about experimentation and capable of recruiting and training people to drive turnout to events. Nicole Cardi is named as a figure at the top of the Get Free movement. The narrative shifts to donations, stating that donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which is under Department of Justice investigation for foreign contributions. ActBlue allegedly funds activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, which purportedly orchestrates resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis and has been reported to pay protesters, receiving over 7,600,000 dollars from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros. The speaker concludes with a personal reaction to the information, expressing a need to stay away, before the conversation ends with Speaker 0 saying they have to stand there.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm a journalist, and I'm wondering if there's someone I can speak to. I mean, any any Is there someone that I can speak to? Speaker 1: Yeah. I think they might be, like, on the other side Speaker 0: of the park, actually. No. Yeah. So said you would be here. Speaker 1: Oh, no. But other side of park's actually Speaker 0: Why are you so upset? Why are you so angry? I was angry right here. What? You seem don't angry right seem like really jittery, like upset. You're just annoying. That's all. Oh, why am I annoying? Speaker 1: Meet Naftali Aaron Kranz. He's a paid protester through and through. Here's him posting on LinkedIn to hire paid protesters for the company he works for called GetFree. Listen to this. GetFree is hiring for part time mobilization support contractor. That just means paid protester. We're seeking out people with four plus years of experience in leading direct action and large scale mobilizations, demonstrations, protests, and civil disobedience, which just means experience getting arrested. Compensation is 3,500 to $4,200 a month for an average of twenty hours a week. Get Free on their website calls themselves a grassroots organization when Naftali and others are literally being paid to protest. Get Free wants to quote undo white supremacy. Naftali thinks one of the best ways to do that is to celebrate vandalism, saying Crown Heights stay winning after someone threw an egg at a stranger's cyber truck and placed dog feces on it. Here's Naftali at an abolish the police rally. You can see he's not leading the protest, just blending in amongst the other recruits. He can get his photo op later because the way this works is combining all the leftist causes together to make the individual causes look bigger than they are. And, of course, he works with the DSA, which is why I ran into him at this DSA Tax the Rich rally. On LinkedIn, you can see Naftali frequently doing his paid protester posts saying, come work with and help us expand our effort to win reparations across the country. And Naftali is recruiting nationwide in Chicago, The Bay Area, and Baltimore. Now let's see what happens when we click on one of these links attached. It's a nine week contract part time paying $3,400 in stipends issued biweekly, and they're looking for someone excited about experimentation and will recruit people and train them to drive turnout to events. We see Nicole Cardi at the top of the Get Free movement. She says that George Floyd protests were the reason Biden won the twenty twenty election. Now we can see that these protest NGO groups are about one thing, getting Democrats elected. So it's only fitting that donations to get free are funneled through ActBlue, who is under investigation by the Department of Justice for foreign contributions. Act Blue has funneled billions of dollars for activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities who is orchestrating the resistance on ICE agents in Minneapolis. Indivisible has been caught paying protesters and they've received over $7,600,000 from the Open Society Foundation funded by George Soros. I gotta stay away. Alright. Speaker 0: Well, I have to go for a stand here.
WallStreetApes
Posted - February 1, 2026 at 6:32 PM
Saved - February 2, 2026 at 3:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I heard Congresswoman Kat Cammack allege shocking facts about the ACA: only 7% of Americans are on Obamacare; 40% of enrollees are fraud; people earning $600,000 a year are enrolled; big insurers’ profits rose 237% last year. She says Democrats defend the ACA not to help Americans but to benefit big insurance, with taxpayers footing it all.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Congresswoman Kat Cammack says they’ve learned shocking news about the Barack Obama Affordable Care Act - Only 7% of Americans are actually on Obamacare - 40% of everyone enrolled is fraud - People making $600,000 per year are enrolled - Big Insurance companies made 237% increased profits from the program last year Now you know why Democrats are fighting for the Affordable Care Act, it has nothing to do with Americans getting healthcare. Big Insurance companies are making a fortune and 40% of it’s fraud (but Big Insurance still gets paid for it all from taxpayers)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Congresswoman Kat Kamak speaks from off the House floor about Democrats’ discharge petition to extend three years of Obamacare subsidies. She notes that the fight is happening on the House floor, with Jason Smith, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, railing as the petition moves forward. She presents several statistics and claims: only 7% of Americans are on Obamacare programs that receive subsidies. Of that 7%, 40% of people registered are fraudulent, described as duplicative and not supposed to be in the program. She also claims that people making over $600,000 are receiving subsidies for their ACA plans. She argues that these subsidies do not go to individuals directly but to big insurance companies. She cites that these companies are making 237% profits as of last year. Based on that, she questions why the government would send $400,000,000,000 to an insurance company to lower premiums for people making $600,000, stating it “makes no sense.” Kamak asserts the need to fix health care, not to throw money at a one-size-fits-all program that only addresses 7% of the population. She contends there should be a program that addresses 100% of the needs of Americans today. Her proposed approach emphasizes lowering premiums while increasing care, advocating for true health care rather than sick care and a focus on prevention rather than maintenance. She opposes subsidizing wealthy CEOs and insurance companies that are already earning high profits and alleging that denials are up while care is down. The message concludes with a commitment to continue the fight “to the very, very bitter end,” signaling a partisan battle over the future of Obamacare subsidies and health care policy. Stay tuned for more updates.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey guys, Congresswoman Kat Kamak here. I am just off the house floor and you can probably hear in the background, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, Jason Smith railing railing right now because the Democrats have forced a discharge petition to the floor that would extend three years worth of Obamacare subsidies. Now here's what you need to know. And you can probably see right behind me on this TV and then right behind me that door leads to the house floor where this fight is happening right now. Here's what you need to know. Only 7% of Americans are on the Obamacare programs that receive subsidies. Now of those 7%, there's 40% of people registered that are actually fraudulent. Like fraudulent as in they're duplicative, they are are not supposed to be in the program. In fact, they're finding that people making over $600,000 are receiving subsidies for their ACA, their aka Obamacare plans. Now here's the real rub. These subsidies don't go to individuals directly. They go to big insurance companies. Insurance companies like, well, we all know their names, but let's be honest. These are companies that are making 237% profits as of last year. So why in the world would we send $400,000,000,000 to an insurance company to lower premiums for people making $600,000? It makes no sense. We need to fix health care, not throw money at a one size fits all program that's only addressing 7% of the population. We should have a program that addresses a 100% of all of the needs of Americans here today. So here's what we're gonna do. We're gonna lower premiums. We're going to increase care. We're going to actually have health care, not sick care and focus on prevention, not maintenance. That is how we do this. Not by subsidizing wealthy CEOs and insurance companies that are already making an insane amount of money and making the programs nonfunctional. Denials are up, care is down. It's time for us to fix this. So stay tuned for more. But this is a fight that we are going to have to the very, very bitter end.
View Full Interactive Feed