TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @WallStreetApes

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - March 10, 2026 at 2:12 AM

Saved - March 10, 2026 at 2:39 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I grew up Muslim and studied the Qur'an for years. In this clip I say the audience missed what was said because it was in Arabic. It quotes Surah 9:5, “the sword,” often called the verse of the sword, about fighting until submission and paying jizya. I question symbolism, context, and how religious texts are used in modern politics, asking if people would stay silent for another faith.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Woman who grew up as a Muslim exposes we all missed what was said at the mosque Zohran Mamdani gave his speech at when he got elected mayor of New York City She says we all missed it because it was in Arabic They called to kill all the infidels (us) “Listen very carefully to the verse that is being recited here: (She shows the footage, it really happened) ‘Oh, the killing of the infidels by the sword’ For context, I grew up Muslim. I studied the Qur'an in Islam for years. I wore hijab, my head, and the verse that you just heard is from the Qur'an. It's Surah nine verse five, and it's often referred to by many scholars as the verse of the sword. I mean, this guy kind of has no shame. — This verse speaks about fighting opposing groups until they submit to a political authority and pay a tax that's called the jizya, and the jizya is meant to subdue and humiliate them. All of this, of course, raises a much larger question about symbolism context and how historical religious texts are viewed in modern political spaces. Let's just be honest for a second. If any other religion recited wartime scripture while a politician was present, would people stay silent about it?“

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - March 8, 2026 at 3:14 PM

Saved - March 8, 2026 at 9:34 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I note claims that lab-grown chocolate hits shelves in 2027, with Oreo, Cadbury, and Toblerone funding Israeli biotech because labs are cheaper than farms. I’m told Cadbury Dairy Milk uses vegetable fats alongside cocoa butter in many markets, with standards allowing up to 5% non-cocoa fats; U.S. rules are laxer for milk chocolate. The post also mentions an exposer flagging cadmium trace levels and ultra-processing warnings.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

I verified this and it’s true “Lab-grown chocolate is coming to shelves in 2027. Oreo, Cadbury and Toblerone are already funding the Israeli biotech producing it because a lab is cheaper than a farm” “Cadbury has been quietly replacing your chocolate — This dairy milk isn't legal chocolate in 27 countries, the cocoa butter was replaced with vegetable fat, a cheap blend of 6 industrial oils. What remains is diluted with polyglycerol — Soon even that gets replaced, you'll be eating cells grown in a pharmaceutical tank” Cadbury Dairy Milk (in the UK and many markets) has included vegetable fats (like palm and shea) alongside cocoa butter for years. UK/EU regulations allow up to 5% non-cocoa vegetable fats in chocolate if it meets minimum cocoa solids (20%) and other standards. In America standards are much lower - For milk chocolate specifically: Only 10% chocolate liquor, 12% milk solids, and 3.39% milk fat are required “Exposer flagged lead in cadmium traces with an ultra processing warning”

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - March 4, 2026 at 12:00 PM

Saved - March 4, 2026 at 1:56 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I learned, via FOIA, that Democrats funded groups paying for voter registrations, with claims that in 2020 the registrations were fake and covered up. The investigation found bags of prepaid voting cards, burner phones, and iPads. GBI Strategies allegedly ran temporary facilities across states, producing thousands of fake registrations, including 10,000 in Michigan, and another 2,500 the next day, with FBI involvement. Muskegon alone had over 10,000 fake registrations; guns with silencers were also found. Democrats and the media said the election was 100% secure, yet FOIA exposed otherwise.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 Freedom of Information Act request reveals Democrats are paying companies to provide voter registrations, and in the 2020 election THEY WERE FAKE and covered up Police investigated and found bags of prepaid voting cards, burner phones, iPads used for the operation. It was covered up - A Democrat funded organization called GBI Strategies setup temporary facilities in multiple states and produced fake voter registrations - 10,000 voter registration forms from a single individual with GBI strategies in Swing State Michigan - The same woman returned the next day with another 2,500 voter registration applications - Police investigated and found bags of prepaid voting cards, burner phones, iPads used for the operation - The case was involved a multi-state operation; the FBI took over, suspecting interstate activity - Over 10,000 fake voter registrations found just in Muskegon, Michigan - All these fake voter registrations can still be on voter rolls - According to the Michigan State Police report obtained via FOIA guns equipped with silencers were found during the investigation Democrats and the media said the election was 100% secure, yet it took a Freedom of Information Act to get this information

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 26, 2026 at 5:14 AM

Saved - February 28, 2026 at 12:19 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I read that the Florida Department of Health tested 46 top candy brands, finding 28 with unsafe arsenic levels. They claim chronic exposure raises cancer risk and other neurological issues. The post lists safe annual piece limits by candy, e.g., Black Forest Gummy Bears 16, Laffy Taffy 4, Nerds 96, Sweet Tart Originals 48, Hershey’s Cookies and Cream 1.5 bars, etc.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is INSANE “This is how many pieces of your child's favorite candy they can consume per year before they surpass their safe level of arsenic intake:” Black Forest Gummy Bears - 16 pieces per year Laffy Taffys - 4 pieces per year Trolli Sour Gummy Worms - 12 pieces per year Hershey’s Cookies and Cream bars - 1.5 bars per year Jolly Ranchers -6 per year Kit Kats -4 per year Twizzlers Strawberry - 4 per year Twizzlers Cherry - 8 per year Nerds - 96 pieces per year (This is less than one mini box) Nerds Gummy Clusters - 24 pieces per year Sweet Tart Originals - 48 pieces per year Sweet Tart Ropes - 3 per year This is based on new Florida guidelines, not the paid off FDA ‘The Florida Department of Health recently tested 46 top candy brands and found that 28 contained unsafe levels of arsenic. Chronic exposure to high arsenic levels can cause increased cancer risk, cognitive decline, behavioral and neurological disorders, neuromotor dysfunction, and affects your nervous system.’

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 26, 2026 at 2:00 PM

Saved - February 27, 2026 at 7:08 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I claim 8,000 pages show Fulton County DA Fani Willis colluding with the Justice Department, the January 6 Democrats, and the Biden White House. Biden's White House allegedly waived Trump's executive privilege; the Justice Department supposedly approved a two-week request to mobilize federal workers to aid a state case against a federal figure. The fix was in. Democrats and everyone involved should be rotting in prison. This is treason.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Lawsuit reveals 8,000 pages of documents showing Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis “colluded with the Justice Department, with the January 6th Democrats and the Biden White House” “Joe Biden's White House said, we'll waive Donald Trump's executive privilege for you” “The Justice Department said, we'll waive and approve your two-week request, which are requests to get federal workers to help you build a state case against a federal or national figure. The fix was in” Democrats and everyone involved should be rotting in prison. This is treason

Video Transcript AI Summary

Just the News reports a story based on thousands of pages of documents obtained over years with the help of America First Legal, focusing on Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her prosecution of a state case against Donald Trump that mirrored the federal case led by Jack Smith. The documents, they say, show that Willis was in deep collusion with the Justice Department, with the January 6 Democrats, and with the Biden White House. The claim is that the Biden White House said it would waive Donald Trump’s executive privilege for Willis, and the Justice Department said it would waive and approve Willis’s 2E requests to obtain federal workers to help build a case against a national figure at the state level. The report asserts the “fix was in” and that this constitutes the strongest evidence to date of coordinated action to pursue Trump across jurisdictions. The asserted significance is that the Democrats intentionally and strategically created a double jeopardy, double drain machine to go after Trump, potentially infringing civil liberties by pursuing prosecutions in multiple venues for the same or related conduct. The narrative claims this involved the Biden White House, the Biden DOJ, and the January 6 Democrats pressing Willis to create a system where Trump could be targeted in more than one place, a scenario described as a “double jeopardy, double drain.” The report suggests this development is now focused in Miami and anticipates further disclosures. Looking ahead, the program teases next steps: tomorrow they plan to reveal whether there was a financial incentive or “financial follow the money” stream to Willis tied to her pursuit. They note that if this pattern occurred in Georgia, there are similar election cases in Wisconsin and Arizona, raising questions about federal taxpayers funding state efforts to smear Trump and create multi-state double jeopardy scenarios. The discussion frames these elements as part of a conspiracy case beginning to unfold in Miami. Upcoming segments are promised to include new election integrity revelations from figures like Tulsi Gabbard, Kash Patel, and Pam Bondi. These revelations are expected to concern intrusions and issues targeting the 2026 election, with the aim of informing Senate members—potentially swaying those on the fence about the Save or related measures. The program signals that these developments will be explored in upcoming appearances, including guests such as Barry Loudermilk.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You've got, some breaking news and stories you're bringing up at Justin News. Give us just give us the you're the Pathfinder. Tell us what's dropping and what's about to drop. Speaker 1: What we have just a few minutes ago and put up on Justin News is a story, that we got thousands of pages of documents we had to sue for multiple years with the help of America First Legal to get Fonny Willis to finally cough up. What did they show? They show that Fonny Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney who brought the first state case against Donald Trump that mirrored or mimicked the Jack Smith case against President Trump, was in deep collusion with the Justice Department, with, the January 6 Democrats and the Biden White House. Yep. Joe Biden's White House said, we'll waive Donald Trump's executive privilege for you. The Justice Department said, we'll waive and approve your 2E request, which are requests to, get federal workers to help you build a, state case against a federal or national figure. The fix was in. And why is this important? Because this is the best proof we've had to date. These documents, 8,000 pages, everybody should go read them. They're up at Just the News. They show that the Democrats intentionally and strategically created a double jeopardy, double drain machine to go after Donald Trump, potentially another violation of the civil liberties of Donald Trump and his followers who were prosecuted and pursued after the twenty twenty election. We have double jeopardy. We're protected from being prosecuted for the same crimes in two places, except in this case you see the Biden Justice Department, the Biden White House, and the January 6 Democrats trying to push Fonny Willis to create a double jeopardy, double drain situation for Donald Trump. That's not what we do in America. If you're a patriot, if you're a patriot, you might do that. This is day one. Tomorrow, we're going to show people whether there was a financial incentive, financial reward, a financial follow the money stream to Fonny Willis that comes in as she's pursuing this. And you can assume that if it happened in Georgia, well, we have similar election cases now in Wisconsin and Arizona. The next question will be for the Justice Department, for the FBI, for the congressional investigators like Barry Loudermilk, who's coming on my show tonight. Did it happen in those states? Was this so orchestrated that federal taxpayers were funding the state, efforts to smear Donald Trump to create double jeopardy, double drain situations in multiple states. It will become part of the conspiracy case. It is now working out of Miami. That's what's happening. Next week, I think we'll get our first taste of some of the new election integrity revelations that people like Tulsi Gabbard and Kash Patel and Pam Bondi have been working on. We'll learn of some new intrusions and some things that should concern us and that we can fix with the twenty twenty six election. I think it's the sort of stuff that will wise up some senators who might be on the fence on They the Save might get a little smarter when they hear these next revelations, probably next week.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 25, 2026 at 5:45 AM

Saved - February 25, 2026 at 10:05 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I spent my career at the CIA and NSA. I looked into why Charlie Kirk might have ordered an audit into Turning Point USA just before he was assassinated. Three consulting firms were funded by TPUSA, all owned by a single TPUSA Director.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This woman worked her entire career at the CIA and NSA She says she looked into why Charlie Kirk might have ordered an audit into Turning Point USA right before he was assassinated 3 consulting firms were being funneled money from TPUSA, all 3 were owned by 1 Director at TPUSA https://t.co/EviP7z9Q6m

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 24, 2026 at 3:15 PM

Saved - February 24, 2026 at 4:12 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

There’s an epidemic of sexual abuse in the state. Our firm alone has identified over 360 perpetrator teachers in California—just in California? Correct, and we know there are many more; we certainly don’t have all the cases.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

🚨 Just one law firm has identified 360 teachers that are sexual predators in California “There is an epidemic of sexual abuse in the state — Our firm alone has discovered over 360 perpetrator teachers” “Just in California?” “Correct, and we believe there's many, many more. We know there's many more. 'cause we certainly don't have all of the cases.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker identifies the main issue in the California public school system (K-12) as an epidemic of sexual abuse by teachers, coaches, and other school employees. The speaker notes that it wasn’t until 2012 that a victim could file a civil lawsuit for damages in California. Since then, the speaker’s firm has filed dozens of such lawsuits. The firm states that it alone has discovered over three fifty or three sixty perpetrators, teachers. The speaker confirms there are many more perpetrators beyond those identified by the firm because the firm does not have all of the cases.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: What's the issue in the California Public School System K-twelve? The main issue is that there is an epidemic of sexual abuse in the state. The by teachers, by coaches, and by other school employees. It wasn't until 2012, you could actually file a lawsuit, a civil lawsuit for damages as a victim of sexual abuse in California. And since then, our firm alone has filed dozens. Our firm alone has discovered over three fifty or three sixty perpetrators, teachers. Wait, three fifty, three sixty? Just in California? Correct. And we believe there's many, many more. We know there's many more because we certainly don't have all of the cases.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 20, 2026 at 12:00 PM

Saved - February 20, 2026 at 3:19 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I reported to California authorities that nearly 700 freight companies are tied to one quiet Signal Hill address near Long Beach, with about 500 listing the same email. It looks like the perfect cover for fake trucking firms, and the money laundering never stops in California.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

700 companies are headquartered at one address in a small building in Los Angeles County, California This was reported to California authorities and you guessed it, nothing was done Money laundering “Take a look at this quiet building in Signal Hill, California. Doesn't look like the headquarters of hundreds of trucking companies right? But federal records show nearly 700 freight companies tied to this single address. Roughly 500 of those companies list the same email.” This would be the perfect place to put fake trucking companies in Los Angeles County because Signal Hill is right next to Long Beach, California. Long Beach is the 2nd largest container port in America The money laundering never stops in California

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 highlights a quiet building in Signal Hill, California, that seems unlikely to be the headquarters for hundreds of trucking companies. Federal records reportedly show nearly 700 freight companies tied to this single address, with roughly 500 of those companies listing the same email: WTF FMCSA@AOL.com. The segment notes that CRAX reported this exact address to federal regulators two years ago, and asks, "Because if we all know about it and we reported it, why is something not being done?"

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Take a look at this quiet building in Signal Hill, California. Doesn't look like the headquarters of hundreds of trucking companies. Right? But federal records show nearly 700 freight companies tied to this single address. Roughly 500 of those companies list the same email. WTF FMCSA@AOL.com. How ridiculous and absurd is this? CRAX reported this exact address to federal regulators two years ago. Because if we all know about it and we reported it, why is something not being done?

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 18, 2026 at 1:01 AM

Saved - February 18, 2026 at 4:07 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 Journalist went undercover at the New York City Board of Elections posing as a non citizen BOARD OF ELECTIONS ADMITS TO REGISTERING ILLEGALS TO VOTE The say they won’t report illegals registering "We accept anything that comes over the counter” https://t.co/9iAS4uuWNl

Video Transcript AI Summary

The video documents an undercover-style investigation at the New York City Board of Elections on the 10th Floor at 200 Varick Street, focusing on whether noncitizens can register to vote. Speaker 0 plans to pose as a noncitizen Canadian green-card holder and attempts to engage a staffer about voter registration. In the first encounter, Speaker 2 tells Speaker 1 that “Everything you fill out, you’re swearing an affidavit that everything you’re putting down is true,” and notes that “you gotta be a citizen to fill it out.” Speaker 1 identifies as “a green card holder from Canada.” The staffer initially signals uncertainty about whether to fill out the form, saying, “I wouldn’t fill it out,” but also suggests the possibility that noncitizens have previously registered. Speaker 0 observes that the staffer does not state it would be illegal to complete the application as a noncitizen, only that the staffer “doesn’t recommend it.” The conversation reveals that the staffer acknowledges noncitizens have registered before: “We have people who come in here and they have legal situations and they registered, they weren’t a citizen, boom boom boom.” The staffer also admits that they “can’t stop you from submitting the application,” and that there is generally no full background check; “we can’t do our background check on you. We just collect it. That’s it.” Speaker 2 reinforces that the staff’s role is to collect and submit, not to verify citizenship, stating, “we accept anything that comes over the counter,” and reiterating that “if it comes back to you, it comes back to… If it doesn’t, it doesn’t.” When Speaker 1 asks if they will report the noncitizen, the staffer responds, “No. No. No. I’m not… that’s not my job to report anyone. My job is just to collect the application and put it and submit it to the department.” Speaker 0 cites New York election law—“Under New York election law, section seventeen one zero six, any election officer who willfully violates any provision of the election law relative to the registration of electors is guilty of a felony”—to argue that processing a noncitizen registration would be a criminal offense. After leaving the office, the pair return to request more information, but the staffer becomes suspicious, consults a coworker, and then refuses to accept their application. The video notes that, according to the staff, “we get registrations come to the mail. We, you know, we whatever comes through, we accept and then it’s submitted,” and emphasizes the absence of ID or proof of citizenship requirements at registration, solely requiring an affidavit asserting citizenship. The segment concludes by highlighting concerns about potential threats to electoral integrity, asserting that there is no requirement to show ID or documentation to register, and that all that is required is signing an affidavit claiming American citizenship.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: It seemed like before you were about to accept my voter registration form even though I told you I was a green card holder. Speaker 1: I'm just a green card holder. Like, so you're not gonna report me if Speaker 2: I do this because I No. No. No. We accept anything that comes over the counter. You know, we have people who come in here and they have legal situations and they register, they weren't a citizen, boom boom boom. So Speaker 0: How often do things like that happen? Right now, I'm in front of 200 Varick Street in New York City, New York. And inside this building on the 10th Floor is an office of the New York City Board of Elections. Now, I'm gonna go in there and I'm going to pose as a non citizen Canadian green card holder. Speaker 1: I'm a green card holder from Canada. Speaker 0: And I'm just gonna see how far I can get in the voter registration process. So let's see what happens. So Speaker 1: I talked to a gentleman before and he said he could help me with registering to vote. Yeah. It's my first time. So what do I have to show you guys? Speaker 2: Everything you fill out, you're swearing an affidavit that everything you're putting down is true, and that's it. Cabo seat filling out. Speaker 1: Oh, got it. Okay. Alright. I'm a green card holder from Canada. Speaker 2: Okay. Yeah. You gotta be a citizen. I I wouldn't wouldn't fill it out. Speaker 1: You wouldn't fill it out? Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, you gotta be a citizen to fill it out. Speaker 0: Notice that he doesn't tell me it would be illegal to complete the application as noncitizen. Only that he doesn't recommend it. From here, things get even more concerning. Speaker 1: The reason why somebody somebody told me that they were a green card holder and that they came in and then they submitted and they were good. Speaker 2: We can't stop you from submitting the application and if it goes through, but most likely because they don't do like a full background check, but once in a while, you know, we have people who come in here and they have legal situations and they registered, they weren't a citizen, boom, boom, boom. So Speaker 0: This is a direct admission that non citizens are in fact registering to vote. Something that many claim is a conspiracy theory. Speaker 1: Alright. Here's the deal. To be honest with you, I'm like, I'm really against everything that's going on right now and I'm trying to do my part. So like, do you mind if I fill this out or is it okay with you? Speaker 2: Up to you. That's right. I can't tell you what to do. You wanna fill that, fill it out. But everything is clear clearly stated, especially at this bottom, it says American citizens. You know, if you fill that out and you're not, you know, if it comes back to you, it comes back to If it doesn't, it doesn't. Speaker 1: But but you But but Speaker 2: we accept anything that comes over the counter, you know. Speaker 1: But you're you're not gonna report me or something like that? Speaker 2: No. No. No. I'm not no. We don't report anyone. Whoever fills that application out comes to us. Speaker 1: But I'm just a green card holder. Like, I don't wanna get so you're not gonna report me if I do this because Speaker 2: I No. No. No. I'm not no. I'm not that's not my job to report anyone. My job is just to collect the application and put it and submit it to the department. Speaker 0: Under New York election law, section seventeen one zero six, any election officer who willfully violates any provision of the election law relative to the registration of electors is guilty of a felony. It would be a criminal offense for this worker to process my voter registration after I admitted to being a noncitizen. Speaker 1: Can I take this with me? Is that okay? Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. Take one of these. Yeah. You can take that or, you know, take them out. Mhmm. Speaker 1: Okay. But just to be clear, if I if I do do this, you will be able submit it for me. Not a problem. Speaker 2: Yeah. We'll submit it. That's you know, because we we can't do our background check on you. We just collect it. That's it. Speaker 1: That's Okay. Speaker 2: I mean, we're going off your work. I mean, you check off because at the top, we'll ask you, you know, are you a citizen or not? You know, you just check yes or you check no. You know, we get up with we get registrations come to the mail. We, you know, we whatever comes through, we we accept and then it's it's submitted. Speaker 0: We walked out of the office and ultimately didn't submit any application, as doing so would be illegal. We later returned to try to get more information from this worker. However, when we did so, he seemed to get suspicious of us and consulted a coworker. He then changed his tune and refused to accept our application. Despite this, it seems from our first interaction that this worker was willing to accept my voter registration application when I initially claimed that I was not a US citizen. How many non citizen voter registration applications has this worker or his coworkers accepted? Why did he suggest he would process my application? We asked him ourselves. Here's what he had to say. This is the gentleman who was about to accept my voter registration form the first time we went in when I said that I was just a green card holder. Here he is now. He doesn't want to atone for what happened. You mentioned to me that you've had situations where non citizens have registered to vote. Can you tell me more about that? Speaker 2: Can you Speaker 0: tell me a little more about that? It seemed like before you were about to accept my voter registration form even though I told you I was a green card holder. How often do things like that happen? I just wanna know, so you were about to accept my voter registration form the first time until upper level management got involved. How many, if any, non citizen voter registration forms do you guys process? How often does that happen? Because it seemed to me like you were about to accept my form. Can I get an idea of how commonplace this is? Are you concerned about the integrity of our elections? Can we get your name? Can you tell us any information? Because we're pretty concerned. Can we ask you a couple questions, man? Come on. You're just gonna do us like that? This is not a good look. So this is the situation out here. In New York City, at these centers where voter registration applications are taken in and processed, there is no requirement to show a ID or social security or any sort of proof of identification. Nothing like that. All you have to do is sign an affidavit that states that you are an American citizen and that is it. You don't have to bring any sort of documentation to corroborate that fact. This is one of the many potential threats to our electoral system here in The United States Of America. Hi.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 18, 2026 at 1:01 AM

Saved - February 18, 2026 at 4:03 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 Journalist went undercover at the New York City Board of Elections posing as a non citizen BOARD OF ELECTIONS ADMITS TO REGISTERING ILLEGALS TO VOTE The say they won’t report illegals registering "We accept anything that comes over the counter” https://t.co/9iAS4uuWNl

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 17, 2026 at 12:00 PM

Saved - February 18, 2026 at 7:07 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I note 38,000 ballots arrived at 3:45 a.m. after Election Day in Michigan (2020). I allege over 100% turnout, 40,000 voters registered two days before, 100,000+ mismatched poll-book votes, and names on processed ballots not matching electronic records. I claim 17,327 dead voters, blocked poll challengers, nameless ballots, impossible birth years, backdated entries with fake dates, and up to 120% turnout.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 38,000 ballots arrived at 3:45 a.m. after Election Day in Michigan during the 2020 election - OVER 100% VOTER TURNOUT - 40,000 voters registered to vote 2 DAYS BEFORE the election - Over 100,000 votes “mismatched” in poll books - NONE of the names on processed ballots were found in the regular electronic poll books - 17,327 dead people voted, verified with Michigan online obituaries - Poll challengers were not allowed to continue legal duties - Ballots with no attached names - Ballots with impossible details, like a person born in 1921 but supposedly registered to vote in 1900 (21 years before birth) - Ballots observed being backdated from November 4 to November 2, with poll workers entering data, including fake dates - As much as a 120% voter turnout (clear voter fraud)

Video Transcript AI Summary

Key points from the testimonies: - There is a contention that ballots were run through the counting process multiple times, possibly thousands, with Speaker 0 noting statements that ballots could have been counted up to 30,000 times. When examining the poll book and comparing it to the votes cast, it is asked whether the numbers would align with the total votes from Detroit. - Speaker 2 asserts that the poll book is "completely off," with Speaker 3 estimating an error of over 100,000 in the poll book. A Downriver resident explains arriving at 3:40 a.m. due to 38,000 ballots that were “ride here” and “sitting over there and getting counted,” framing this as an eye-opening revelation about hypocrisy. - Security measures are described as unusual: Speaker 3 notes that windows are being taped up so challengers cannot see in, or out, raising questions about transparency. - Speaker 4 describes observing that none of the names on ballots were being scanned from the ballots into electronic poll books; instead, names appeared only on supplemental sheets. They note electronic poll books were updated on Sunday, November 1, implying that thousands of new ballots would have had to be registered on November 2 or 3. The speaker began writing down names after ballots were scanned but was obstructed by five individuals, including a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and a top ABCB leader, according to their affidavit. The speaker questions whether 30,000 to 40,000 new voters could have been legally signed up in two days. - Speaker 5 reports ballots that do not belong to anybody and do not appear in voter registration. They describe ballots with no names attached and note attempts to reevaluate them by placing them in a box. Multiple ballots show several different numbers. - Speaker 6 explains that, on the tables, ballots are accompanied by a computer screen showing which ballot it is. Sometimes a ballot has no name, but the registration file shows a person born in 1921 registered long before that year (1900), suggesting anomalies. The speaker asks what is wrong with being born in 1921, while Speaker 5 emphasizes a registration dating to 1900. - Speaker 7 lists egregious items: not allowed to perform duties, GOP challengers obstructed, procedures not followed, backdating ballots from November 4 to November 2, and data entered into computers for mail-in ballots with dates of birth like 01/01/1900, absent from electronic poll books or paper supplement books prior to that. They claim dead people were voting and reference a list of 17,327 Michigan voters over 80 who voted in 2020 and were found in obituaries online. This speaker calls the election described as the most important in their lifetime and in the republic’s history. - Representative Johnson is also mentioned, with a prompt to question the turnout rate, hinting at a purported turnout of 120%. Overall, the testimonies allege discrepancies between poll books and ballots, improper registration, backdated or misdated ballots, ballots lacking identifying information, obstructions to challengers, and possible participation of non-existent or deceased voters, culminating in claims of a highly irregular election process.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: If these ballots were run through multiple times, as you've always I think you said possibly up to 30,000 times, definitely thousands of times Mhmm. Being counted. When we examine the poll book and see who voted and we count those numbers Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Would they then not line up with the total number of votes coming out of Detroit? Speaker 2: Just later. Later. The the poll the poll book is completely off. Completely off. Speaker 0: Off. That poll thousand? Speaker 3: I'd say that poll book is off by over a 100,000. Speaker 2: Where are you from? Oh, I'm from Downriver. Okay. I'm here because of the 38,000 ballots that ride here at 03:40AM that are just now sitting over there and getting counted Okay. Supposedly. Okay. And that's why I arrived Okay. To an eye opening of hypocrisy. Let me tell you. Speaker 3: Something I want you to see, they're taping up the windows. Security's taping up taping up the windows so that people who are challenging cannot see in here and and he can't see out. So it's an interesting development. Interesting development. Speaker 4: I began observing the process of ballots at several counting boards. I quickly noticed that none, and I mean none, of the names were being scanned from the ballots were in the electronic poll books. All of the names that were found were found in the supplemental sheets. We know that the poll books, the electronic poll books, were updated on Sunday, November 1. That meant that all of these new ballots had to have been brand new registered voters on Monday, November 2, or Tuesday, November 3. I found it very hard to believe that tens of thousands of people had registered in just two short days. So I began writing down the names on the ballots immediately after they were scanned by the computer poll worker. As soon as I began, I was severely obstructed by five different persons that I could no longer such that I could no longer continue my legal responsibility as a poll challenger. These five persons comprised of a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and one of the top leaders of the ABCB. The details can be found on my affidavit. Does anyone believe that 30 or 40,000 new voters were actually signed up legally in two days? Speaker 5: Yeah. And what have you seen? I've seen ballots that don't belong to anybody. They don't show up in the voter registration. There's no name attached to them. Speaker 6: And what are they doing with those ballots? Speaker 5: They I'm challenging them. They're supposed to put them in a box to be then reevaluated. But then multiple ballots that have several different numbers. Okay. One person with different numbers. We have full list of them. We're writing everything down all day long. Speaker 6: So are they improperly filled out Speaker 5: and you're looking to disqualify them? They're improperly filled out if they have no name, if they don't have a home, or if the person was born in 1921 but registered to vote in 1900, that kind of doesn't make sense. So but that's not on the ballot. Speaker 6: When you vote, your ballot is just the balls in which you have on there. What are you seeing? Are you seeing people's registration forms? Yes. Speaker 5: We are. So on the tables, Speaker 6: you have the ballot, and then you are able to see next to them Speaker 5: On a computer screen. A computer screen whose ballot that is. Sometimes, say, the ballot itself has no name, but the ballot is filled out. Okay. And then if we go into the registration file, we find the person that has been I mean, was born in 1921, and it's just a lot of there's a lot that's not right. Speaker 6: What's wrong with being born in 1921? Speaker 5: But registering to vote in nineteen nineteen hundred, twenty one years before you're born. Speaker 7: Following are only a few of the most egregious items witnessed, I was not allowed to perform my job and from what I observed were any of the GOP challengers in accordance with Michigan laws. We were constantly prevented from getting close enough to see what was going on with respect to the ballots. Procedures were not being properly followed when we brought these to the attention of the supervisors, our concerns were dismissed and ignored. We observed ballots being backdated from eleven point four to eleven point two and data being entered into the computers for these mail in ballots. Poll workers were entering ballot information from new mail in ballots including dates of birth of 01/01/1900 into the electronic poll books and processing those ballots for tabulation. The information was not entered wasn't in either the electronic poll book or the paper supplement book prior to that. Dead people were voting. I sent a website to that effect, and the list that they had up to that date was 17,327 randomly checked Michigan voters that were registered for voting and were above the age of 80. Every name on this list has voted in the twenty twenty election, check for yourself, and has also been found in one or more of the obituaries online. This is the most important election in my lifetime and I think the most important election in the history of our republic. Speaker 1: That poll book? Why don't you look Speaker 6: at the registered voters on there? How many registered voters are on there? Did you do you even know the answer to that? Speaker 0: No. I guess it's I'm trying to get to the bottom of Speaker 3: this here. Speaker 6: Zero. There's zero. Speaker 0: So my question then is if the Speaker 1: Guess how many wait. What about what about how what what what about the turnout rate? A 120%? Speaker 0: Let's let's let representative Johnson ask his classic question.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 16, 2026 at 3:15 AM

Saved - February 16, 2026 at 12:19 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

American Pharmacy Worker gives a behind the scenes look at our healthcare system He shows a medication costs less than $4 to dispense Since the patient has insurance, the insurance company makes them charge $97 US Health Insurance companies should be prosecuted https://t.co/f05nj8IlPJ

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 expresses frustration over a price discrepancy in a prescription transaction. The core facts cited are: a medication that costs $4 to dispense, when billed to the insurance, results in the patient being charged $97.06. Speaker 0 repeats the puzzling situation: “We have a claim for a prescription that costs less than $4. The insurance wants to charge the patient $97.” The concern is the patient’s likely reaction: they will be yelled at and blame CVS for the high price set by their insurance, even though the dispensing cost is described as less than $4. Speaker 0 highlights the misalignment between the pharmacy’s dispensing cost and the amount the patient is asked to pay after insurance processing, indicating a breakdown in the expected pricing flow from the pharmacy to insurance to patient. The dialogue underscores the emotional and reputational pressure on the pharmacy staff when patients perceive the price as excessive, regardless of where the markup originates. The closing sentiment, “Love you CVS,” signals a mixture of familiarity and exasperation with the CVS system or process involved in this pricing scenario, though the exact sentiment toward CVS is not elaborated beyond that line.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hey. Come here. Tell me how this makes sense. We have a medication that costs $4 to dispense. You bill to the insurance, and they wanna charge the patient $97.06 Say that again? We have a claim for a prescription that costs less than $4 The insurance wants to charge the patient $97 So what are we gonna do? We're gonna get yelled at by the patient. And they're gonna blame us for their insurance charging them that price saying we made it that price. Love you CVS.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 13, 2026 at 12:00 PM

Saved - February 13, 2026 at 3:39 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I reference a memo claiming the FBI planned for January 6th months in advance, including embedding informants and mass arrests of conservatives, and that a Boston tabletop exercise occurred in Aug 2020. Kash Patel turned the memos over to Congress at Chairman Loudermilk’s request. The memos allegedly show the FBI anticipated a contested election and proposed strategies—informants in volatile groups and mass prosecutions—to hurt conservatives, not liberals.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 New memo reveals the FBI planned for January 6th MONTHS IN ADVANCE They planned to plant informants in this crowd and PLANNED MASS ARRESTS OF CONSERVATIVES They literally KNEW it would be rigged because they only planned arrests for conservatives, not liberals “They had a tabletop exercise that they ran in Boston in August of 2020, five months before January 6th occurred.” “The memos, which Kash Patel just turned over to Congress, he just found them recently, turned them over to Congress at the request of Chairman Barry Loudermilk. Who's in charge of the J6 investigation now in the House, showed that the FBI knew there was a strong possibility of a hanging election or a contested election — they even devised very specific strategies. -One of them is to embed informants inside the groups where the most likely political violence or political agitation might occur - The second thing they recommended was mass prosecutions, even for the most minor of crimes, exactly what the FBI did after January 6th. Now, there are two big things about that strategy. It's pretty clear the strategy was hatched months before and that's what they carried out — The FBI, knowing something was going to happen, implementing a strategy that hurt conservatives but not liberals”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The discussion outlines that a year before January 6, the FBI conducted a planning exercise and had specific plans for the event. Speaker 1 states there was a tabletop exercise run in Boston in August 2020, five months before January 6. The memos that Kash Patel turned over to Congress, recently provided at the request of Chairman Barry Lautomilk, show that the FBI knew there was a strong possibility of a hanging or contested election, with both sides agitated and likely to escalate to violence. The memos also reveal that the FBI devised specific strategies, including embedding informants inside groups where political violence or agitation might occur. According to Speaker 1, the FBI had two dozen informants on the ground on the morning of January 6, and recommended mass prosecutions, even for the most minor crimes—described as exactly what the FBI did after January 6. Speaker 1 emphasizes two major points about the strategy: first, that the strategy was conceived months in advance and was carried out; second, that it represented a double standard because it differed from how political violence at BLM protests and far-left actions in 2020 were handled. The claim is that informants were embedded in both left- and right-wing groups, including Antifa and right-wing groups, and that intelligence suggested a bad episode would occur. They allege that, according to Chairman Barry Lautemux, warnings from informants were strong, but Capitol stakeholders in Washington, DC, did not receive those warnings or pass them along. This, they argue, shows two failed examples of the FBI under the Chris Ray era, with foreknowledge of events but actions that hurt conservatives while not alerting liberals or those who could have prevented violence. The documents are presented as now public, described as stunning by the speakers. Regarding whether there was any briefing to higher-level officials, Speaker 0 asks if there is evidence that Bill Barr, Chris Ray, or staff at the White House were briefed after the tabletop exercise and plan development. Speaker 1 responds that there is no indication of briefing the attorney general or other senior officials. There is no documentation showing that Barr, the Homeland Security Department, the Capitol Police, or the Washington, DC Metropolitan Police were alerted. The speaker notes that this suggests an insular FBI operation, drawing a comparison to pre-nine-eleven dynamics, implying systemic issues within the FBI.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Let me get this correct. A year before January 6, the FBI knew there might be some consternation about the election given everything given the Democrats already war gaming it. They thought this thing through, and they actually had plans specifically for January 6, sir? Speaker 1: Yeah, they did. They had a tabletop exercise that they ran in Boston in August 2020, five months before January 6 occurred. The memos, which Kash Patel just turned over to Congress, he just found them recently, turned them over to Congress at the request of Chairman Barry Lautomilk, who's in charge of the J-six investigation now in the House, show that the FBI knew there was a strong possibility of a hanging election or a contested election, that both sides appeared to be agitated and likely would, it could likely carry out that agitation to the point of violence. And they even devised very specific strategies. And one of them is to embed informants inside the groups where the most likely political violence or political agitation might occur. That is something that the FBI did. We had two dozen informants on the ground on the morning of January 6. The second thing they recommended was mass prosecutions, even for the most minor of crimes. Exactly what the FBI did after January 6. Now, there are two big things about that strategy. It's pretty clear the strategy was hatched months before and that's what they carried out. It's not the strategy they use for the political violence at BLM and the far left conducted all throughout the 2020. So a very clear double standard. The second thing is they did embed informants in a lot of groups, including left and right groups, Antifa and right wing groups. And they got lots of intelligence suggesting a bad episode would occur. We now know from Chairman Barry Lautemux that that while those warnings were very strong from the informants, the preparations of the warnings from the FBI to the brethren of the Capitol in Washington DC did not exist. They didn't pass on the warnings from the informants. So two failed examples of the Chris era of the FBI. Knowing something was going to happen, implementing a strategy that hurt conservatives but not liberals and not warning the people who could actually prevent the violence from occurring. That is the legacy of the Chris Ray FBI. It's what we now have on open. These documents are now out there for everybody to see. Pretty stunning, though maybe not so stunning given what we've learned about the FBI. Speaker 0: Is there any part of this that shows that they briefed that Bill Barr and Chris Ray briefed the president of The United States or briefed his staff or briefed senior people at the White House after the tabletop exercise and after they came up with a plan of how to get informants, is there any evidence at all that people that should have known about this were actually informed about it? Speaker 1: No, it doesn't look like the attorney general knew Bill Barr or the brass, at least not as of now. There's no documentation showing that. There's no mention of it in the documents even suggesting that we alert the Attorney General or the Homeland Security Department or the Capitol Police or the Washington DC Metropolitan Police. So it looks like the insular sort of pillared FBI existed again. These are the same diseases that affected the FBI before nineeleven and you're starting to see the same thing.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 9, 2026 at 11:55 PM

Saved - February 10, 2026 at 11:27 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Amelie Zilber tells her 6.4 million followers she is so horrified by what she’s reading in the new Jeffrey Epstein files she’s having a hard time sleeping She believes we are all severely “under reacting” to what we are learning and should be DEMANDING accountability https://t.co/mnOHctTlPC

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 expresses extreme alarm about revelations described as “coming out from these vials” and questions whether everyone is paying attention to what is being revealed. They fear they may have to explain to others what they are hearing and seeing, and worry they will sound like they are experiencing psychosis because they cannot sleep and feel “so fucking angry.” They declare they are “petrified” and describe the material as “some of the most vile, most demonic shit I have ever even fathomed” and “unfathomable.” They feel that people are not paying attention and that there is under reaction to these distressing revelations. They worry that, when exposed to such distressing information, people may become numb, a response they acknowledge as a valid human experience, but they believe it is unacceptable in this context: “we numb ourselves and we block it out because it's too much.” They speculate about others who are reading or observing the revelations, asking if “these fucking fucked up freaks” are sitting there laughing and saying that “everything's out and nothing's gonna happen,” noting that “we got away with the most horrifying stuff” and insisting that it’s “not even humanly possible to believe that this is happening.” The speaker repeats their inability to wrap their mind around “the fact that these things happened,” labeling it “unconscionable.” They ask, “what the fuck are we supposed to do? Genuinely, what the fuck are we supposed to do?”, conveying a sense of urgent seeking for guidance or action in response to the perceived revelations and their emotional impact.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Are we all seeing what's being revealed? Are we all paying attention to the things that are coming out from these vials? Because I'm worried that I'm going to have to try and explain to somebody what I'm hearing and seeing, and I'm going to sound like I'm experiencing psychosis because I feel like I'm experiencing psychosis. I don't I can't even sleep. I'm so fucking angry. I'm petrified. This is some of the most vile, most demonic shit I have ever even fathomed. Like, it is unfathomable. And I feel like people are not paying attention. I feel like we are under reacting. I feel like I'm very worried that when we are exposed to such distressing information, like, are being overloaded with the most appalling news ever that we numb. We numb ourselves and we block it out because it's too much, which is like a totally valid human experience and thing to do. But, like, we cannot do that. We cannot do that because, like, are these fucking fucked up freaks, like, sitting there laughing, being like, well, everything's out and nothing's gonna happen and, like, look, we got away with it. And, like, we got away with the most horrifying stuff that like, it's not even humanly possible to believe that this is happening. Like, I I literally cannot wrap my mind around the fact that these things happened. It is unconscionable. And, like, what the fuck are we supposed to do? Genuinely, what the fuck are we supposed to do?

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 11, 2026 at 12:00 PM

Saved - February 9, 2026 at 2:44 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I report that the Office of the Legislative Auditor found Minnesota Democrats did no site visits for nearly $200 million in annual grants to addiction and mental health providers. When asked for evidence, they allegedly created fake documents and backdated them. The OLA called this egregious—records didn’t exist, then appeared, some backdated two years. The BHA failed to ensure providers did the work; no site visits were conducted.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

The Office of the Legislative Auditor reveals Minnesota Democrats have done NO SITE VISITS for $200 million dollars worth of grants PER YEAR to addiction and mental health service providers When they asked for evidence, Democrats just created fake documents and then backdated them to pretend they had records “This was definitely the most egregious thing I have seen, maybe in my whole time working at OLA — Office of the Legislative Auditor released a damning report finding state employees fabricating records to cover up mismanagement of money, tax money. — So these documents should exist. They didn't. We asked for them. All of a sudden, they now exist. And in at least one case, it was created wholesale and backdated by two years to give the impression that it had always been there and been done on time” “The OLA audited the Behavioral Health Administration within the Department of Human Services, which issues grants nearly $200 million of taxpayer money each year to addiction and mental health service providers. But the audit found BHA was not making sure those providers were doing the work. BHA didn't conduct the site visits”

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 4, 2026 at 12:00 PM

Saved - February 4, 2026 at 6:21 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I report claims that a protest organizer posted paid protest jobs: $3,500–$4,200 a month for about 20 hours weekly. Nate Friedman says Ehrenkranz recruits nationwide (Chicago, Bay Area, Baltimore) for a nine-week, part-time contract paying $3,400 in stipends biweekly. It also alleges ActBlue funnels billions to groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, which pays protesters and has drawn $7.6 million from the Open Society Foundation, funded by Soros.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

EXPOSED 🚨 A protest organizer has been caught posting paid job positions to protest “Here's him posting on LinkedIn to hire paid protesters — Compensation is $3,500 to $4,200 a month for an average of 20 hours a week” Multiple major American cities hiring protesters Nate Friedman “Naftali Ehrenkranz is recruiting nationwide in Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore. Now let's see what happens when we click on one of these links attached. It's a nine week contract part time paying $3,400 in stipends issued biweekly” “ActBlue has funneled billions of dollars for activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, who is orchestrating the resistance on ICE agents in Minneapolis. Indivisible has been caught paying protesters, and they've received over $7.6 million from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros”

Video Transcript AI Summary

A journalist engages with a person at a park, aiming to speak to someone, and the conversation shifts to a narrative about Naftali Aaron Kranz. The speaker identifies Kranz as a paid protester through GetFree, detailing LinkedIn evidence of the arrangement. GetFree is described as hiring for part-time mobilization support contractors, seeking individuals with four or more years of experience in leading direct action, large-scale mobilizations, demonstrations, protests, and civil disobedience (the latter implying experience with arrests). Compensation is stated as 3,500 to 4,200 dollars per month for an average of twenty hours a week. GetFree brands itself as a grassroots organization, but Kranz and others are described as being paid to protest. The narrator asserts Kranz’s role in celebrating vandalism, citing an incident in Crown Heights where someone threw an egg at a stranger’s Cybertruck and dog feces were placed on it, describing Kranz as part of this sentiment. They place Kranz at an abolish-the-police rally, noting he was blending in with other recruits rather than leading, with the implication that field photos can be staged for later use. The claim is made that Kranz works with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), and the narrator reports meeting him again at a DSA Tax the Rich rally. LinkedIn activity is cited to show Kranz frequently posting about recruitment and expanding efforts to win reparations nationwide, with mentions of Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore. A linked link is described as listing a nine-week contract, part-time, paying 3,400 dollars in stipends biweekly, seeking someone excited about experimentation and capable of recruiting and training people to drive turnout to events. Nicole Cardi is named as a figure at the top of the Get Free movement. The narrative shifts to donations, stating that donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which is under Department of Justice investigation for foreign contributions. ActBlue allegedly funds activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, which purportedly orchestrates resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis and has been reported to pay protesters, receiving over 7,600,000 dollars from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros. The speaker concludes with a personal reaction to the information, expressing a need to stay away, before the conversation ends with Speaker 0 saying they have to stand there.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I'm a journalist, and I'm wondering if there's someone I can speak to. I mean, any any Is there someone that I can speak to? Speaker 1: Yeah. I think they might be, like, on the other side Speaker 0: of the park, actually. No. Yeah. So said you would be here. Speaker 1: Oh, no. But other side of park's actually Speaker 0: Why are you so upset? Why are you so angry? I was angry right here. What? You seem don't angry right seem like really jittery, like upset. You're just annoying. That's all. Oh, why am I annoying? Speaker 1: Meet Naftali Aaron Kranz. He's a paid protester through and through. Here's him posting on LinkedIn to hire paid protesters for the company he works for called GetFree. Listen to this. GetFree is hiring for part time mobilization support contractor. That just means paid protester. We're seeking out people with four plus years of experience in leading direct action and large scale mobilizations, demonstrations, protests, and civil disobedience, which just means experience getting arrested. Compensation is 3,500 to $4,200 a month for an average of twenty hours a week. Get Free on their website calls themselves a grassroots organization when Naftali and others are literally being paid to protest. Get Free wants to quote undo white supremacy. Naftali thinks one of the best ways to do that is to celebrate vandalism, saying Crown Heights stay winning after someone threw an egg at a stranger's cyber truck and placed dog feces on it. Here's Naftali at an abolish the police rally. You can see he's not leading the protest, just blending in amongst the other recruits. He can get his photo op later because the way this works is combining all the leftist causes together to make the individual causes look bigger than they are. And, of course, he works with the DSA, which is why I ran into him at this DSA Tax the Rich rally. On LinkedIn, you can see Naftali frequently doing his paid protester posts saying, come work with and help us expand our effort to win reparations across the country. And Naftali is recruiting nationwide in Chicago, The Bay Area, and Baltimore. Now let's see what happens when we click on one of these links attached. It's a nine week contract part time paying $3,400 in stipends issued biweekly, and they're looking for someone excited about experimentation and will recruit people and train them to drive turnout to events. We see Nicole Cardi at the top of the Get Free movement. She says that George Floyd protests were the reason Biden won the twenty twenty election. Now we can see that these protest NGO groups are about one thing, getting Democrats elected. So it's only fitting that donations to get free are funneled through ActBlue, who is under investigation by the Department of Justice for foreign contributions. Act Blue has funneled billions of dollars for activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities who is orchestrating the resistance on ICE agents in Minneapolis. Indivisible has been caught paying protesters and they've received over $7,600,000 from the Open Society Foundation funded by George Soros. I gotta stay away. Alright. Speaker 0: Well, I have to go for a stand here.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 1, 2026 at 6:32 PM

Saved - February 2, 2026 at 3:22 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I heard Congresswoman Kat Cammack allege shocking facts about the ACA: only 7% of Americans are on Obamacare; 40% of enrollees are fraud; people earning $600,000 a year are enrolled; big insurers’ profits rose 237% last year. She says Democrats defend the ACA not to help Americans but to benefit big insurance, with taxpayers footing it all.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Congresswoman Kat Cammack says they’ve learned shocking news about the Barack Obama Affordable Care Act - Only 7% of Americans are actually on Obamacare - 40% of everyone enrolled is fraud - People making $600,000 per year are enrolled - Big Insurance companies made 237% increased profits from the program last year Now you know why Democrats are fighting for the Affordable Care Act, it has nothing to do with Americans getting healthcare. Big Insurance companies are making a fortune and 40% of it’s fraud (but Big Insurance still gets paid for it all from taxpayers)

Video Transcript AI Summary

Congresswoman Kat Kamak speaks from off the House floor about Democrats’ discharge petition to extend three years of Obamacare subsidies. She notes that the fight is happening on the House floor, with Jason Smith, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, railing as the petition moves forward. She presents several statistics and claims: only 7% of Americans are on Obamacare programs that receive subsidies. Of that 7%, 40% of people registered are fraudulent, described as duplicative and not supposed to be in the program. She also claims that people making over $600,000 are receiving subsidies for their ACA plans. She argues that these subsidies do not go to individuals directly but to big insurance companies. She cites that these companies are making 237% profits as of last year. Based on that, she questions why the government would send $400,000,000,000 to an insurance company to lower premiums for people making $600,000, stating it “makes no sense.” Kamak asserts the need to fix health care, not to throw money at a one-size-fits-all program that only addresses 7% of the population. She contends there should be a program that addresses 100% of the needs of Americans today. Her proposed approach emphasizes lowering premiums while increasing care, advocating for true health care rather than sick care and a focus on prevention rather than maintenance. She opposes subsidizing wealthy CEOs and insurance companies that are already earning high profits and alleging that denials are up while care is down. The message concludes with a commitment to continue the fight “to the very, very bitter end,” signaling a partisan battle over the future of Obamacare subsidies and health care policy. Stay tuned for more updates.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hey guys, Congresswoman Kat Kamak here. I am just off the house floor and you can probably hear in the background, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, Jason Smith railing railing right now because the Democrats have forced a discharge petition to the floor that would extend three years worth of Obamacare subsidies. Now here's what you need to know. And you can probably see right behind me on this TV and then right behind me that door leads to the house floor where this fight is happening right now. Here's what you need to know. Only 7% of Americans are on the Obamacare programs that receive subsidies. Now of those 7%, there's 40% of people registered that are actually fraudulent. Like fraudulent as in they're duplicative, they are are not supposed to be in the program. In fact, they're finding that people making over $600,000 are receiving subsidies for their ACA, their aka Obamacare plans. Now here's the real rub. These subsidies don't go to individuals directly. They go to big insurance companies. Insurance companies like, well, we all know their names, but let's be honest. These are companies that are making 237% profits as of last year. So why in the world would we send $400,000,000,000 to an insurance company to lower premiums for people making $600,000? It makes no sense. We need to fix health care, not throw money at a one size fits all program that's only addressing 7% of the population. We should have a program that addresses a 100% of all of the needs of Americans here today. So here's what we're gonna do. We're gonna lower premiums. We're going to increase care. We're going to actually have health care, not sick care and focus on prevention, not maintenance. That is how we do this. Not by subsidizing wealthy CEOs and insurance companies that are already making an insane amount of money and making the programs nonfunctional. Denials are up, care is down. It's time for us to fix this. So stay tuned for more. But this is a fight that we are going to have to the very, very bitter end.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 1, 2026 at 3:56 PM

Saved - February 2, 2026 at 9:07 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I describe claims that, for the 2020 election, Pennsylvania had 205,000 more votes than registered voters, over 1.5 million fraudulent votes counted with a spread under 82,000, ballots from dead voters and ballots received before mail-out, 330k electronic spikes, 682k ballots processed without oversight, and over 1.5M votes allegedly to spread Biden’s win. Georgia alleged underage and dead voters, felons, 200k fraudulent votes, 4,500 from unregistered voters. Arizona: 10,457 margin, 36,400 non-citizens, ~50,000 phantom spikes. These come from public sources.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Donald Trump just posted evidence Democrats are stealing our elections For the 2020 Election: Pennsylvania: - 205,000 more votes than registered voters - Over 1.5 million fraudulent votes counted, and the spread is less than 82,000 votes - These fraudulent votes come from dead voters, ballots that were received before they were supposedly mailed out - Over 330,000 electronic spikes from the voting machine - 682,000 ballots that were illegally processed without any oversight whatsoever - More than 1.5 million votes in Pennsylvania is apparently what it took for Joe Biden to steal the state Georgia: - 66,248 underage voters voted in Georgia. 10,315 dead people voted - 2,500 convicted felons voted - Nearly 200,000 votes were fraudulently inserted into the vote count instantaneously - 4,500 votes come from unregistered voters. Arizona: - The final result is only a difference of 10,457, yet 36,400 non-citizens voted in the state - Arizona also experienced phantom spikes from the voting machines to the tune of roughly 50,000 additional votes going to Joe Biden “These numbers come from information that is publicly available, whether from the Secretary of State's website before the content was removed, or from the raw data that was pushed out on election night”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Over 1,500,000 fraudulent votes counted, and the spread is less than 82,000 votes. These fraudulent votes come from dead voters, ballots that were received before they were supposedly mailed out, and over 330,000 electronic spikes from the voting machine. 205,000 over votes, meaning there were 205,000 more votes than registered voters, and 682,000 ballots that were illegally processed without any oversight whatsoever. More than 1,500,000 votes in Pennsylvania is apparently what it took for Joe Biden to steal the state. Georgia has a similar phenomenon that Democrats are failing to account for. 66,248 underage voters voted in Georgia. 10,315 dead people voted. 2,500 convicted felons voted. Nearly 200,000 votes were fraudulently inserted into the vote instantaneously. 4,500 votes come from unregistered voters. These numbers show a clear pattern that a variety of types of fraud occurred in this election and that Democrats are desperately trying to cover it up. They're going to great lengths to change the narrative of the election fraud in an effort to run up the clock to 01/20/2020. In addition to president Trump's team, many independent groups have completed research on the fraud and the results are staggering. Totaling across the country, millions of votes were fraudulently covered up, changed, or deleted in favor of Joe Biden. The governors and secretaries of state have actively participated in the cover up. Removing information from their website that is normally easily accessible to the public and depriving conservatives a chance to audit or review the results are just some of their tactics. In Arizona, the final result is only a difference of 10,457, yet 36,400 non citizens voted in the state. Arizona also experienced phantom spikes from the voting machines to the tune of roughly 50,000 additional votes going to Joe Biden. These numbers come from information that is publicly available, whether from the secretary of state's website before the content was removed or from the raw data that was pushed out on election night.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Over 1,500,000 fraudulent votes counted, and the spread is less than 82,000 votes. These fraudulent votes come from dead voters, ballots that were received before they were supposedly mailed out, and over 330,000 electronic spikes from the voting machine. 205,000 over votes, meaning there were 205,000 more votes than registered voters, and 682,000 ballots that were illegally processed without any oversight whatsoever. More than 1,500,000 votes in Pennsylvania is apparently what it took for Joe Biden to steal the state. Georgia has a similar phenomenon that Democrats are failing to account for. 66,248 underage voters voted in Georgia. 10,315 dead people voted. 2,500 convicted felons voted. Nearly 200,000 votes were fraudulently inserted into the vote instantaneously. 4,500 votes come from unregistered voters. These numbers show a clear pattern that a variety of types of fraud occurred in this election and that Democrats are desperately trying to cover it up. They're going to great lengths to change the narrative of the election fraud in an effort to run up the clock to 01/20/2020. In addition to president Trump's team, many independent groups have completed research on the fraud and the results are staggering. Totaling across the country, millions of votes were fraudulently covered up, changed, or deleted in favor of Joe Biden. The governors and secretaries of state have actively participated in the cover up. Removing information from their website that is normally easily accessible to the public and depriving conservatives a chance to audit or review the results are just some of their tactics. In Arizona, the final result is only a difference of 10,457, yet 36,400 non citizens voted in the state. Arizona also experienced phantom spikes from the voting machines to the tune of roughly 50,000 additional votes going to Joe Biden. These numbers come from information that is publicly available, whether from the secretary of state's website before the content was removed or from the raw data that was pushed out on election night.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 1, 2026 at 12:16 AM

Saved - February 1, 2026 at 1:43 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I report James O’Keefe exposing a protester nonprofit with a $30 million budget, funded by American taxpayers for ICE protests. He says the United States government funds this, citing Make the Road New York. They reportedly have a 501 nonprofit status, file a 990, and received about $16 million in grants. The government funding claim is emphasized.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

🚨 James O’Keefe EXPOSES a paid protester nonprofit organization that has a budget of $30 MILLION American taxpayers are literally paying for our own ICE protests “The United States government is funding this” “Protester we secretly recorded talks about an organization called Make the Road New York. We've never heard of this organization, but apparently they have a budget of $30 million — We looked up the tax returns of make the road New York and found there were registered 501 that file a 990 and they received $16 million in grants” Again, “The United States government is funding this”

Video Transcript AI Summary

A protester, speaking during a recording, discusses an organization called Make the Road New York and its perceived financial scope as part of a broader critique of immigrant-rights organizations. The protester asserts that Make the Road New York has a budget of $30,000,000 and notes that the topic of the immigrants’ rights organization is of interest to those observing organizational funding and influence. The speaker identifies themselves as being with a union, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). They state that they looked at the tax returns of Make the Road New York and found there were registered 501(c)(3) entities that file Form 990, and that Make the Road New York “received $16,000,000 in grants.” This claim ties the organization to a substantial influx of grant funding, suggesting a significant level of financial support from funders or the government. The conversation shifts toward hypothetical implications of such funding, with the speaker asking, “Can you imagine what Nick Shirley could do with $16,000,000? Can you imagine what James O’Keeffe could do with $16,000,000?” This line of inquiry appears to juxtapose the perceived influence of large sums of money with recognizable figures associated with political and investigative activities, raising questions about the power and use of funds. A broader assertion follows: “The United States government is funding this.” This statement connects the funding to government support, implying that public dollars are being directed toward Make the Road New York or similar organizations. The speaker then contrasts national debt with alleged fraud, stating, “We're 36,000,000,000,000 in debt, or are we 36,000,000,000,000 in fraud?” This rhetorical question presents a dichotomy between debt and fraud on a colossal scale, underscoring the protester’s critical stance regarding government spending and accountability. Overall, the excerpt highlights concerns about the financial backing of Make the Road New York, the role of grant funding for immigrant-rights organizations, and the perceived connection to government funding, framed within a broader critique of national debt and potential misallocation of public resources.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This other protester we secretly recorded talks about an organization called Make the Road New York. We've never heard of this organization, but apparently, they have a budget of $30,000,000. I mean, if you're interested in in on the immigrants' right organization, you should look up Make the Road New York. Make the Road New York. Make the Road New But who are you with? I'm just with the I'm with the union. Oh. Yeah. S e I u, service employees, international. We looked at the tax returns of Make The Road New York and found there were registered five zero 1 c three that file a nine ninety, and they received $16,000,000 in grants. We are in the wrong business, everyone. Can you imagine what Nick Shirley could do with $16,000,000? Can you imagine what James O'Keeffe could do with $16,000,000? The United States government is funding this. We're 36,000,000,000,000 in debt, or are we 36,000,000,000,000 in fraud?

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 30, 2026 at 12:00 PM

Saved - January 30, 2026 at 2:30 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I report Forbes alleging Ilhan Omar and her husband run a money-laundering operation. He says their investment firm has no track record, no clients, no SEC registrations, with a DC WeWork‑type office and dubious winery. He questions how they rose from near‑zero net worth to multimillions, implying money may come from illegal sources, including about $30 million.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Steve Forbes, chairman and editor-in-chief of Forbes, says Ilhan Omar and her husband are running a money laundering operation 🚨 Ilhan Omar’s husbands investment firm was looked into, THERE IS NO RECORDS OF THEM MANAGING MONEY, “NO CLIENTS” “His investment firm — It’s DC headquarters appear to share office space at a WeWork. There's no track record of his firm managing money, doing M&A deals, no clients we see, no investment deals or any work it's done. They say they do work in 80 nations operating in. There's no SEC registrations for them as investment advisers. What is going on here? This increasingly looks sketchy, both the winery and his investment firm. Yeah, the winery may not exist and the firm may be just a really a name only” “It’s amazing how people can go into Congress and then become these entrepreneurial investing geniuses, where they come in, she had under $1,000 of net worth, and her husband didn't have much, and suddenly now they're multimillionaires. Is there a money laundering operation here — something is not right” “That $30 million came from sources that are illegal, period”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The discussion centers on Ilhan Omar and questions about a sudden surge in wealth. The hosts reference Omar claiming the United States of America, and report new information from Forbes that the state of Delaware and Washington DC canceled the registrations for Omar’s husband’s investment firm, Rose Lake, for failing to pay back taxes—over $400,000 in Delaware and nearly $1,800 in DC. Omar has claimed the couple’s wealth rose to $25,000,000 from less than a grand a year prior. The hosts note the firm is supposedly worth an estimated $75,000,000 to $150,000,000, calling the situation “weird.” Steve Forbes responds, calling the situation “crooked” and arguing for an investigation into Omar and her husband’s finances, noting that the Biden administration had previously examined their finances but the inquiry “went nowhere.” Forbes questions how the couple, who reportedly had under a thousand dollars in net worth and little for Omar and her husband, could become multimillionaires. He raises the possibility of money laundering and asks where the winery in California fits in, suggesting the wine venture has a “sketchy background.” Omar is described as blaming others and engaging in race-baiting, though no public evidence of a winery exists. The winery is said to be valued at $5,000,000. Forbes notes Omar’s husband’s investment firm appears to have a DC headquarters sharing office space at a WeWork, with no visible track record of asset management, M&A deals, clients, or investment deals, and no SEC registrations for investment advisers. Forbes emphasizes the lack of verifiable activity and questions what is going on with the winery and the investment firm. The discussion suggests the investment firm may be largely a name or shell, and the WeWork office is highlighted as a potential red flag. The hosts anticipate that the $30,000,000 figure could originate from illegal sources, predicting that the wealth increase will be traced to illicit origins. The segment concludes with Steve Forbes assisting in breaking down the story, with plans to stay on the coverage.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Okay. That was far left congresswoman Ilhan Omar claiming the justice department in congress probing her sudden skyrocketing wealth to $30,000,000 in just one year that they have a problem with her living the American dream. You heard her say the goddamn United States Of America. We've got new questions on where she and her husband got all that money. Joining us now, Forbes media chair, editor in chief c Forbes. Steve, new information coming in in Forbes Magazine. Your magazine has reported this too, that the state of Delaware and Washington DC canceled the registrations for Omar's husband's investment firm, Rose Lake, for not paying its back taxes. We saw it owed more than 400,000 to Delaware and nearly 1,800 to DC. She's claiming it's worth 25,000,000 from less than a grand a year before. How can this investment firm not afford to pay taxes? It's supposedly worth an estimated 75,000,000 to 150,000,000. This is really weird stuff. Speaker 1: Well, weird is not the word for it. There's another word for it called crooked, and that's why we have to have an investigation into this. As you know, the Biden administration examined started examining her finances and then that of her husband. And so so surprise, surprise, that investigation went nowhere. But it's amazing how people can go into congress and then become these entrepreneurial investing geniuses where they come in. She had under a thousand dollars of net worth, and her husband didn't have much, and suddenly now they're multimillionaires. Is there a money laundering operation here? And in terms of in terms of the the firms themselves, they have a sketchy background over that winery in California that she and her husband own. Where did that come from? Where's the wine there? And nobody can seem to find it. So, there's a lot of smelly stuff here. And that's why in the American dream, her version of the American dream is the Al Capone version of the American dream, Tony Soprano version of the American dream, and that is steal it, steal it from the taxpayers. And so, there's a lot of stuff here. And so when somebody cloaks themselves in the, oh, the American dream, and so you have numbers like this from minus 1,000 to thirty, forty million, you know something is not right. Speaker 0: Yes. She's also also, like, blaming people, bullying, doing race baiting, race bullying. There's no evidence, public evidence, there's even a winery. She valued it at $5,000,000 His investment firm is real. It's supposedly real. Its DC headquarters appear to share office space at a WeWork, Steve. There's no track record of his firm managing money, doing M and A deals. No clients we see, investment deals, any work it's done. They say they do work in 80 nations operating in. There's no SEC registrations for them as investment advisers. What is going on here? This increasingly looks sketchy, both the winery and his investment firm. Speaker 1: Yeah. The winery may not exist, the firm may be just really a name only. As you say, we work office. Big deal. So that's why the investigation needs to be done. And, suddenly, all that 30,000,000, I think you're gonna find, I'll make a speculation or prediction, that 30,000,000 came from sources that are illegal, period. Speaker 0: Thank you so much, Steve Forbes, helping us to break it down. We're gonna stay on the store.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 26, 2026 at 12:00 PM

Saved - January 28, 2026 at 4:13 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I report that the largest refugee resettlement NGO is taxpayer funded and funds the Somali American Community Center, whose businesses allegedly sign refugees up for government benefits. David Khait says Congress seeks $5B for resettlement; the IRC outsources work to the Center. We found an almost abandoned retail space and claims that most Somali immigrants rely on public assistance (87%). After three days in Little Somalia, Atlanta, I found: paying to import immigrants, NGOs funnel funds to welfare, then ongoing welfare payments.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOW 🚨 The largest refugee resettlement NGO in the country is taxpayer funded and is giving money to the Somali American Community Center The Somali American Community Center building is filled with businesses that SIGN UP REFUGEES FOR GOVERNMENT BENEFITS David Khait “Congress is trying to give $5 billion of your money for refugee resettlement programs, and then it ends up in places like. This is the International Rescue Committee, the largest refugee NGO in the country. They get the government funds and subcontract the work out to places like the Somali American Community Center. It receives grants from the IRC in order to help refugees resettle in America. But when we went in, We found this. An almost completely abandoned retail space which hasn't filed taxes in almost 10 years. Where almost every business is focused on getting refugees on taxpayer funded welfare programs. And that is how the largest refugee city in the country is funded and how over 87% of Somali immigrants end up on taxpayer funded public assistance. We spent three days in Little Somalia in Atlanta, Georgia. The largest refugee center in the entire country and this is what we found.” We are literally: - Paying to import immigrants - Then paying NGOs to send our money to businesses that sign immigrants up for government welfare - Then we pay them all again with monthly welfare payments and programs

Video Transcript AI Summary

The first speaker contends that Congress is trying to give $5,000,000,000 of your money for refugee resettlement programs, and that money ends up in places like this. The second speaker identifies the International Rescue Committee as the largest refugee NGO in the country, noting that they get government funds and subcontract the work out to places like this. The first speaker describes the Somali American Community Center as a location that receives grants from the IRC in order to help refugees resettle in America. The second speaker reports that when they went in, they found this: an almost completely abandoned retail space that hasn’t filed taxes in almost ten years. The first speaker states that almost every business in the area is focused on getting refugees on taxpayer funded welfare programs. The second speaker asserts that this is how the largest refugee city in the country is funded. The first speaker adds that this is how over 87% of Somali immigrants end up on taxpayer funded public assistance. The second speaker notes that they spent three days in Little Somalia in Atlanta, Georgia. The first speaker concludes by saying that in the largest refugee center in the entire country, this is what they found.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Congress is trying to give $5,000,000,000 of your money for refugee resettlement programs, and then it ends up in places like This. Speaker 1: This is the International Rescue Committee, the largest refugee NGO in the country. They get the government funds and subcontract the work out to places like This. Speaker 0: This is the Somali American Community Center. It receives grants from the IRC in order to help refugees resettle in America. Speaker 1: But when we went in, we found this. An almost completely abandoned retail space, which hasn't filed taxes in almost ten years. Speaker 0: Where almost every business is focused on getting refugees on taxpayer funded welfare programs. Speaker 1: And that is how the largest refugee city in the country is funded. Speaker 0: And how over 87% of Somali immigrants end up on tax payer funded public assistance. We spent three days in Little Somalia in Atlanta, Georgia. Speaker 1: The largest refugee center in the entire country, and this is what we found.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 27, 2026 at 10:42 PM

Saved - January 28, 2026 at 1:25 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m citing Rep. Tim Burchett, who alleges members of Congress buy real estate and lease it back to the government. He claims there are federal buildings owned by reps that are rented to the government, calling it a massive scandal. He also cites a chart showing over a trillion dollars in duplicate payments within departments, a issue he says nobody is willing to tackle.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Rep Tim Burchett confirms MEMBERS OF CONGRESS are buying real estate and then renting it back to the government He says there are EVER FEDERAL BUILDINGS owned by Congress reps that are being rented back to government A TRILLION DOLLARS in duplicate records payments “I found out that through government duplication, I've got a chart. It's just the craziest looking thing. And it shows, and my staff has uncovered basically over a trillion dollars of just simple duplication within these departments that nobody is willing to tackle” “A massive scandal, which are Big federal buildings owned by members of Congress that are leased out to the federal government — private buildings owned by members of Congress leased back to the federal government”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Marjorie Taylor Greene said she found the situation in a building that was “basically empty” and questioned whether members of Congress own real estate and rent to the federal government in Washington, DC. She claimed the answer was “Yeah,” and argued this should have been the beginning of addressing corruption. She emphasized she would be different and would be on the front end, aiming to eliminate corruption that has infiltrated committee systems. She acknowledged politics’ current back-and-forth dynamics but said the goal is to reduce that tension and focus on reform. Speaker 1 asked Greene, as Doge chairman, to continue the work on what appears to be a massive scandal: big federal buildings owned by members of Congress and leased back to the federal government—private buildings owned by members of Congress leased to the government—describing it as “the snake eating its tail” and “the tip of the iceberg.” Greene described the broader problem as a frustration with the system and warned against a “shotgun approach,” saying they must not be neutralized and must focus on a few targets. She identified the first focus as the IRS, noting that the big complaint with the IRS, besides “stealing your money,” is that you can’t ever reach them and that their technology is not intermingled. Speaker 1 referenced Greene’s statements about government duplication. Greene said she found through government duplication a chart that “my staff has uncovered basically over a trillion dollars of just simple duplication within these departments that nobody is willing to tackle.” She reiterated the plan to tackle this issue, even if it’s not “sexy,” and to “tackle it,” showing it to the American public, with the hope they will back efforts when changing the structure of government. Greene reiterated that the aim is to focus on a few issues, start with IRS problems, and address the broader duplication and inefficiencies uncovered by her staff. She expressed a determination to reveal these findings to the public and pursue structural changes in government.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Marjorie Taylor Greene had us in there in a building that was basically empty. That was the people that were supposed to be overseeing our real estate. And I asked the question, are members of Congress owning real estate? And the guys that are being rented to the federal government in Washington, DC? And the guy said, Yeah, they are. And it stopped right there. Nothing, nothing. And that should have been the beginning of it. And that's where I'm gonna be a little different. I'm gonna be on the front end of it. It's not gonna be sexy. And hopefully, screaming the screaming will be back and forth because that's just the nature of politics. But we're gonna eliminate that, and we're gonna eliminate the corruption that has infiltrated our committee systems. Speaker 1: You are, as Doge chairman, going to pick up the ball and continue the work when it comes to what seems like a massive scandal, which are big federal buildings owned by members of Congress that are leased out to the federal government. I mean, private buildings owned by members of Congress leased back to the federal government. Yeah. And so that's like the snake eating its tail, right? Speaker 0: As it's the tip of the iceberg. That just shows you my frustration with this thing. I mean, anywhere you look, it's just, it's, you know, we've gotta not be the shotgun approach because that's where we'll be neutralized. We gotta focus in on just a few The first thing, I think we'll have something around IRS time. What's the big complaint with IRS outside of the fact they're stealing your money is that you can't ever get to them. Their technology is not intermingled. Speaker 1: I found out that through government duplication, I've got Speaker 0: a chart, it's just the craziest looking thing. And it shows, and my staff has uncovered basically over a trillion dollars of just simple duplication within these departments that nobody is willing to tackle. It's not sexy, but we're gonna tackle it. We're gonna show you show it to the American public. And hopefully they'll back us when we go to change the structure of government. And that is the tip That of the just shows you my frustration with this thing. I mean, anywhere you look, it's just, it's, you know, we've, we've gotta not be the shotgun approach because that's where we'll be neutralized. We gotta focus in on just a few things. The first thing, I think we'll have something around IRS time. What's the big complaint with IRS outside of the fact they're stealing your money is that you can't ever get to them. Their technology is not intermingled. Speaker 1: I found out that through government duplication, I've got a Speaker 0: chart, it's just the craziest looking thing. And it shows, and my staff has uncovered basically over $1,000,000,000,000 of just simple duplication within these departments that nobody is willing to tackle. It's not sexy, but we're gonna tackle it. We're gonna show you show it to the American public, and hopefully they'll back us when we go to change the structure of government.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 26, 2026 at 7:16 PM

Saved - January 27, 2026 at 3:31 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m an American living in northern India in a small ranch brick home. Our power bills are rising: last month $206, this month $810. How can they get away with this? People around here are talking about protesting and shutting off heat. They’re price gouging the American people, with no repercussions. They get away with it because power companies are huge donors to local and state politicians. Something has to change.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

American lives in northern Indian in a small ranch brick home The power company in their area said to expect bills to increase Last month her bill was $206 This month it’s $810 “How can they possibly get away with this? Everybody in the area is talking about protesting, shutting off their heat — I just want to know how they can get away with this. They are price gouging the American people. There's no repercussions. Something has to change” They get away with it because power companies are huge donors to local and state politicians

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker reports an unusually high monthly utility bill of $810 for gas and electricity, noting that neighbors in the same area have similarly expensive bills. They mention that the gas and electric company, which effectively owns the area, has been signaling through the news that bills would be higher. The speaker questions how the situation can be tolerated, expressing concern about protests and the pressure to turn off heating despite personal needs. They highlight a family situation with three children, including two nonverbal autistic children who require ongoing therapy, costing about $10,000 per year. The speaker asks whether they can continue sending their children to therapy if they must pay over $800 per month just to have heat and electricity in their home. They describe their home as a twelve hundred fifty square foot ranch brick house, noting that it is not large. The speaker emphasizes a perceived lack of accountability, asking how the company can be allowed to act this way. They state, "They are price gouging the American people." They express frustration that there seem to be no repercussions and argue that "Something has to change."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We just got back our gas and electricity bill for this month and it was $810. Everyone in my area has been saying that their bill has been really expensive this month. The gas and electric company that basically owns the area has been posting through the news to expect higher bills. Our bill was $810 this month. Last month it was $2.00 $6 How can they possibly get away with this? I mean, like everybody in the area is talking about protesting, shutting off their heat, but I have three kids. I have two non verbal autistic children that we have to send to therapy for that cost us $10,000 a year. And now I'm like, can we even send them to therapy if we have to pay over $800 a month just to have heat and electric in our home. For reference, we live in a twelve fifty square foot ranch brick home, so our home is not even that big. I just want to know how they can get away with this. They are price gouging the American people. There's no repercussions. Something has to change.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 18, 2026 at 2:37 AM

Saved - January 18, 2026 at 9:07 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I allege the Biden admin secretly funneled millions to CAIR via intermediaries, hid the money to avoid tracking, and used it to admit Muslims and alleged terrorists. I cite 30,000–36,000 lacking ID, a wiretap claiming CAIR would pose as a civil rights group while furthering Hamas, and state totals: California $15M, Washington over $1M. I found no direct federal CAIR entry; funds routed indirectly. This is a scandal.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

INSANE 🚨 Senator Josh Hawley reveals the Biden Admin was secretly funneling millions of dollars to The Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR) into states like California and Washington They hid the money so it couldn’t be tracked and used it to bring in Muslims, even terrorists “We found over 30,000 that did not have formal identification. Say that number one more time. I believe the number is actually 36,000. That's astounding. The Council of American Islamic Relations, CAIR, the wiretap from the 1993 meeting in which CAIR was founded, they specifically stated that they are going to present themselves as a legitimate civil rights organization while furthering the mission of Hamas. How much money did they get from the federal government to shepherd Afghan paroles? - I can say with certainty that in California, they received $15 million - In the state of Washington, they received more than a million dollars. Now, when I look at the federal databases to see if there's any reference to CAIR, I don't see anything. Because the money did not go directly from the federal government to CAIR, but rather a intermediary and that is how they've hidden the money. We need to find out where this money has gone. This is a scandal. This is corruption. And we've got to figure out how taxpayer money has ended up in the hands of yet another organization with terrorist ties.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Official A states that in 2022, the office found that president Biden's DHS allowed some Afghans into the country before they were fully vetted, including one who had been liberated from prison by the Taliban. Official A notes that over 50 known or suspected terrorists had entered the United States as a result of Biden administration screening or lack thereof, and that last month the director of national intelligence said that 2,000 Afghans in America may have ties to terrorism. Official A asks whether a formal vetting process was in place, and asserts that the department did not have a formal process at the start of the OAW. Official A repeats the figure and corrects it to 36,000, calling it astounding. Official B replies that CARE, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, is the organization in question, stating that CARE was founded at a 1993 meeting and that they specifically state they are going to present themselves as a legitimate civil rights organization while furthering the mission of Hamas. Official A asks how much money CARE received from the federal government to shepherd Afghan parolees. Official B responds that CARE received $15,000,000 in California and more than $1,000,000 in Washington. Official A adds that when they check federal databases for CARE, they find nothing, and Official B explains that the money did not go directly from the federal government to CARE, but rather through an intermediary, and that this is how they’ve hidden the money. Official A states, “We need to find out where this money has gone. This is a scandal. This is corruption, and we've gotta figure out how taxpayer money has ended up in the hands of yet another organization terrorized.”

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: 2022, your office found that president Biden's DHS allowed some Afghans into the country before they were fully vetted, including one who had been liberated from prison by the Taliban. Over 50 known or suspected terrorists had entered The United States as a result of the Biden administration screening or lack thereof. And last month, the director of national intelligence said that 2,000 Afghans in America may have ties to terrorism. Did you find that the Biden administration's DHS had a formal vetting process in place? The department did not have a formal process at the start of the OAW. We found over 30,000 that did not have formal identification. Say that number one more time. I believe the number's actually 36,000. That's that's astounding. Speaker 1: The Council of American Islamic Relations, CARE, the wiretop from the nineteen ninety three meeting in which CARE was founded, they specifically state that they are going to present themselves as a legitimate civil rights organization while furthering the mission of Hamas. Speaker 0: How much money did they get from the federal government to shepherd Afghan parolees? Speaker 1: I can say with certainty that in California, they received $15,000,000. In the state of Washington, they received more than $1,000,000. Speaker 0: Now when I look at the federal databases to see if there's any reference to CARE, I don't see anything. Speaker 1: Because the money did not go directly from the federal government to CARE, but rather an intermediary, and that is how they've hidden the money. Speaker 0: We need to find out where this money has gone. This is a scandal. This is corruption, and we've gotta figure out how taxpayer money has ended up in the hands of yet another organization terrorized.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 14, 2026 at 5:33 AM

Saved - January 14, 2026 at 7:00 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is not a third world country This is what it’s like to drive around at night in Minneapolis, Minnesota Mass immigration does not make America better. It does not culturally enrich us. All it does is turns us into a 3rd world hell hole https://t.co/aZ9g672ArY

Video Transcript AI Summary

You have arrived. This is what I get a kick out of. People and property, but without people, there isn't property.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You have arrived. This is what I get a kick out of. People and property, but without people, there isn't property.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 12, 2026 at 3:35 PM

Saved - January 12, 2026 at 7:30 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A user accuses HwaJeong Kim, VP of Saint Paul City Council, of organizing volunteers to deliver groceries to undocumented immigrants during ICE operations in Minnesota, calling for her arrest; another user replies with a link.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

HwaJeong Kim is the Vice President of the Saint Paul City Council in Minnesota 🚨 She is putting together a group of people to do grocery runs for illegals so they don’t have to leave their house while ICE is in Minnesota This is a government employee orchestrating this. Stop putting up with this and go arrest her now

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 describes immediate immigration enforcement activity in their neighborhood, noting: “It's not even noon, and ICE has already kidnapped five of my neighbors.” They add that they responded to an incident where they believe “a whole family was taken with children.” The speaker emphasizes the scale of federal presence, asserting, “There are more federal agents in Minnesota than we have of the Saint Paul and Minneapolis police combined.” Community response is highlighted as neighbors take action in support of those affected. They report neighbors “standing in front of known targeted businesses, helping escort workers home.” To address ongoing disruption to everyday life, the speaker announces the launch of a mutual aid effort: “Today, I'm kicking off one of our first mutual aid grocery runs in my neighborhood.” The aim is to assist, since workers “have been pulled over time and time again, attempting to make deliveries to families that are too afraid to even go grocery shopping.” The speaker also points to growing concerns about enforcement activity in public spaces. They describe “troubling trends where HSI and ICE agents are rolling into, city owned parking lots like our libraries rec centers and our SPPD parking lots.” In response to these incidents, they urge residents to take action by reporting what they see: “If you see this, please record it to the best of your ability and submit to the Ward 5 office.” They promise practical guidance for reporting by noting, “I'll drop the email in the comment below.”

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: It's not even noon, and ICE has already kidnapped five of my neighbors. I responded to one where we believe a a whole family was taken with children. There are more federal agents in Minnesota than we have of the Saint Paul and Minneapolis police combined. And yet, there are neighbors that are showing up in incredible ways, like standing in front of known targeted businesses, helping escort workers home. Today, I'm kicking off one of our first mutual aid grocery runs in my neighborhood, an easy way for folks to get involved, but it's because the workers have been pulled over time and time again, attempting to make deliveries to families that are too afraid to even go grocery shopping. We're also seeing troubling trends where HSI and ICE agents are rolling into, city owned parking lots like our libraries rec centers and our SPPD parking lots. If you see this, please record it to the best of your ability and submit to the Ward 5 office. I'll drop the email in the comment below. See you out there.

@Emilia__writes - Emilia H

@WallStreetApes https://t.co/VDsDlfKno5

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 11, 2026 at 5:21 AM

Saved - January 11, 2026 at 11:01 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m worried the case against Maduro could be dismissed. I say the CIA set up Venezuela’s cocaine networks, and will press the DOJ to drop it to keep details from emerging. The 1993 60 Minutes piece shows the CIA and Venezuelan Guard trafficking cocaine into Miami. The opposition linked to CIA networks; Maduro may have crimes, but a CIA-origin conspiracy makes the case tenuous. I fear CIA pressure on DOJ could derail discovery.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Mike Benz is worried the case against Nicolas Maduro may end up getting dismissed He says the CIA is who setup the cocaine trafficking networks in Venezuela and to make sure details of this don’t get released the CIA will want the DOJ to drop it “The cocaine networks in Venezuela were set up by the CIA, not by Maduro. The fact is, you can simply watch the 1993 60 Minutes episode where Mike Wallace broke that the CIA had set up an anti-cocaine warehouse in Venezuela and then struck a secret agreement with the Venezuelan National Guard to traffic 1,500 tons of cocaine into Miami against the protestations of DEA That was all sold on the streets of Miami to support CIA, Black Operations, paramilitary groups. The opposition backed by the US inside of Venezuela in 2019 is deeply affiliated with the CIA cocaine networks. There are probably international crimes that Maduro committed, but the idea of charging him with running a cocaine conspiracy, which Venezuela inherited from the Central Intelligence Agency itself, has made this case very tenuous. I'm concerned that this case could get dismissed because there's going to be so much last minute craziness going on inside the DOJ as the CIA is going to be constantly leaning on the DOJ to try to limit discovery.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The cocaine networks in Venezuela were set up by the CIA, not by Maduro. A 1993 60 Minutes episode with Mike Wallace reportedly revealed that the CIA had set up an anti-cocaine warehouse in Venezuela and struck a secret agreement with the Venezuelan National Guard to traffic 1,500 tons of cocaine into Miami, with the proceeds sold on the streets of Miami to support CIA black operations and paramilitary groups. The opposition backed by the US inside Venezuela in 2019 is deeply affiliated with the CIA cocaine networks. There are probably international crimes that Maduro committed, but the idea of charging him with running a cocaine conspiracy, which Venezuela inherited from the central intelligence agency itself, has made this case very tenuous. There is concern that the case could be dismissed because there will be considerable last-minute activity inside the DOJ as the CIA is expected to lean on the DOJ to limit discovery.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The cocaine networks in Venezuela were set up by the CIA, not by Maduro. The fact is is you can simply watch the nineteen ninety three sixty minutes episode where Mike Wallace broke that the CIA had set up an anti cocaine warehouse in Venezuela and then struck a secret agreement with the Venezuelan National Guard to traffic 1,500 tons of cocaine into Miami against the protestations of DEA that was all sold on the streets of Miami to support CIA black operations paramilitary groups. The opposition backed by The US inside of Venezuela in 2019 is deeply affiliated with the CIA cocaine networks. There are probably international crimes that Maduro committed, but the idea of charging him with running a cocaine conspiracy, which Venezuela inherited from the central intelligence agency itself, has made this case very tenuous. I'm concerned that this case could get dismissed because there's going to be so much last minute craziness going on inside the DOJ as the CIA is going to be constantly leaning on the DOJ to try to limit discovery.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 8, 2026 at 10:06 PM

Saved - January 9, 2026 at 5:30 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I note that Ring and Flock Safety formed a partnership, enabling AI cameras to pull video from neighbors’ Ring doorbells and link street cameras to front-door footage into a single police surveillance network. ICE and the Secret Service already access Flock; Ring will gain millions more cameras. Ring was fined $5.8 million by the FTC for employees spying on customer videos, turning a home security device into a channel for federal access.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

A new surveillance network is coming to America “Two of the largest private surveillance networks in America just teamed up. Amazon's Ring and Flock Safety have officially partnered. Here's what that means - The AI powered cameras that track your car on the street can now ask your neighbor's Ring doorbell for video of you - They're connecting the street to your front door, creating one massive searchable surveillance network for the police. And this isn't theory. 404 Media has already reported that ICE and the Secret Service have access to Flock Network. Now that network is about to get millions of new cameras from Ring. Remember, Ring was already fined $5.8 million by the FTC because its employees were caught spying on customers' private videos. You bought that doorbell to keep strangers out. Now it's letting federal agents in.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Two of the largest private surveillance networks in America have formed a partnership. Amazon's Ring and Flock Safety have officially joined forces, and the collaboration is presented as a move that could change how surveillance data is accessed and used. The partnership is described as enabling Ring and Flock to interconnect their systems in a way that expands the reach of video data in public and semi-public spaces. The summary asserts that the AI-powered cameras used to track vehicles on the street can now request video from neighbors' Ring doorbells. In practical terms, this means the street-level cameras could obtain footage from front-door devices, effectively creating a link between street surveillance and doorbell cameras. The result is characterized as “one massive searchable surveillance network for the police,” implying broad access to footage for investigative or monitoring purposes. The claim is that this development is not hypothetical. Four0four Media reportedly documented that ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and the Secret Service already have access to Flock's network. With Ring entering the mix, the network is said to be poised to gain millions of additional camera endpoints, further expanding the pool of video data available for review by authorities. The transcript recalls Ring’s regulatory history, noting that Ring had been fined $5,800,000 by the FTC because its employees were reported to have spied on customers’ private videos. The implication drawn is that Ring’s devices were purchased by consumers to deter unauthorized access and intrusions, but the partnership with Flock is framed as a move that extends access to federal agents. The closing emphasis is on the expansion of access to surveillance footage as a direct consequence of Ring’s collaboration with Flock Safety, highlighting a transition from consumer use to broader, potentially federal-level access to video data across a combined network. The overall message conveys concern about the scale and implications of integrating street-level and doorbell video systems, and the potential for law enforcement to draw from a larger, interconnected pool of footage.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Two of the largest private surveillance networks in America just teamed up. Amazon's Ring and Flock Safety have officially partnered. Here's what that means. The AI powered cameras that track your car on the street can now ask your neighbor's Ring doorbell for video of you. They're connecting the street to your front door, creating one massive searchable surveillance network for the police. And this isn't theory. Four zero four Media has already reported that ICE and the Secret Service have access to Flock's network. Now that network is about to get millions of new cameras from Ring. Remember, Ring was already fined $5,800,000 by the FTC because its employees were caught spying on customers' private videos. You bought that doorbell to keep strangers out. Now it's letting federal agents in.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 8, 2026 at 10:06 PM

Saved - January 9, 2026 at 2:32 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I learned Ring and Flock Safety have partnered, linking street cameras with Ring doorbells to form a nationwide, searchable police network. AI cams can ping neighbors’ Ring devices for video, connecting street and home. This isn’t theoretical: ICE and the Secret Service already access Flock. Ring will gain millions more cameras despite its $5.8 million FTC penalty for employees spying on customers; the doorbell now invites federal agents in.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

A new surveillance network is coming to America “Two of the largest private surveillance networks in America just teamed up. Amazon's Ring and Flock Safety have officially partnered. Here's what that means - The AI powered cameras that track your car on the street can now ask your neighbor's Ring doorbell for video of you - They're connecting the street to your front door, creating one massive searchable surveillance network for the police. And this isn't theory. 404 Media has already reported that ICE and the Secret Service have access to Flock Network. Now that network is about to get millions of new cameras from Ring. Remember, Ring was already fined $5.8 million by the FTC because its employees were caught spying on customers' private videos. You bought that doorbell to keep strangers out. Now it's letting federal agents in.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Two of the largest private surveillance networks in America have teamed up: Amazon's Ring and Flock Safety. The partnership means the AI-powered cameras that track cars on the street can now ask neighboring Ring doorbells for video of you, effectively connecting the street to your front door and creating one massive searchable surveillance network for the police. Four zero four Media has reported that ICE and the Secret Service have access to Flock's network, and with this partnership, that network is about to gain millions of new cameras from Ring. Ring was previously fined $5,800,000 by the FTC because its employees were caught spying on customers' private videos. You bought that doorbell to keep strangers out, and now it's letting federal agents in.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Two of the largest private surveillance networks in America just teamed up. Amazon's Ring and Flock Safety have officially partnered. Here's what that means. The AI powered cameras that track your car on the street can now ask your neighbor's Ring doorbell for video of you. They're connecting the street to your front door, creating one massive searchable surveillance network for the police. And this isn't theory. Four zero four Media has already reported that ICE and the Secret Service have access to Flock's network. Now that network is about to get millions of new cameras from Ring. Remember, Ring was already fined $5,800,000 by the FTC because its employees were caught spying on customers' private videos. You bought that doorbell to keep strangers out. Now it's letting federal agents in.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 8, 2026 at 4:10 AM

Saved - January 8, 2026 at 1:31 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

WallStreetApes claimed Minneapolis residents are rallying to use the Second Amendment against federal officers, calling it a real insurrection by liberals. Snoopsmom123 replied by recalling Biden’s past warnings about sanctuary cities and his stance on enforcing federal law, accusing the opposing side of playing with people’s lives.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Minneapolis residents are calling to use their Second Amendment Right against the Federal Government They are rallying their residents to fight back with guns against federal officers This is a REAL insurrection. A liberal insurrection against America https://t.co/f68Jse9sxd

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 argues that, just like George Floyd, there must be violent action: “we're not gonna… tear this motherfucker up.” They claim the second amendment is to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government, stating, “Google it. It's to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government. That's true.” They insist the police should be on “our side fighting, pointing their guns at the fucking government,” and assert, “It's the facts.” They emphasize that the Second Amendment is not for hunting or self-defense, but to protect from tyranny. The speaker expresses personal fear and anger: “I have a little baby,” and asserts, “You put a gun to my baby's head. I'm gonna hurt somebody.” They claim the government is harming them and their community: “That's what they're doing to us.” They identify as not Hispanic and formerly lived comfortably, but now fear for life quality, saying, “I'm black. I used be sitting home smoking my weed, enjoying my money, but I'll die about this shit. I'll have no quality of life left.” They describe difficulties related to immigration status and fear of consequences: their wife, who is documented with a work permit, “won't go to work because they'll take her still.” They claim confiscations of people with documents and even children, and declare that “they're taking people that have documents. They're taking kids.” They declare the world is ending for them and their community and assert the environment as intolerable. The speaker references political outrage and perceived hypocrisy in leadership, noting, “They go snatch the president of Venezuela, but our fucking president is a sex offender.” They suggest drastic action: “Why are we not the White House dragging him out by his fucking collar? That’s where we gotta go, you guys, to White House.” They describe the situation as unsustainable and dismiss what they call “bullshit,” insisting the current state cannot continue. They mention abortion in a negative or contradictory context with frustration: “You can just abort a baby,” implying a provocative or incendiary line of argument. Overall, the message centers on fervent anti-government and anti-establishment sentiment, the belief that the Second Amendment serves as protection against tyranny, a call for direct action, fear for personal and family safety, and accusations of political hypocrisy and systemic oppression affecting immigrants, Black people, and ordinary citizens.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Just like with George Floyd. We're not gonna what? We're tear this motherfucker up. That's what the fuck has to happen. Do you does anybody know why we're given the second amendment right? Google it. It's to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government. That's true. The police are supposed to be on our side fighting, pointing their guns at the fucking government. It's the facts. It's not for hunting. It's not for self defense. It's to protect ourself from a tyrannical government. It don't get no worse than this. It don't. Yep. What the fuck? I know that, sir. What the fuck? I have a little baby. I have a little fucking baby, man. And it's like I had you a doctor to protect her from this shit. You put a baby to my gun's head. You put a gun to my baby's head. I'm gonna hurt somebody. That's what they're doing to us. I'm not Hispanic. I'm black. I used be sitting home smoking my weed, enjoying my money, but I'll die about this shit. I'll have no quality of life left. If you think you do, you're fucking nuts. We don't have no quality of life left. My wife is a documented she has her work permit. It's legit. She won't go to work because they'll take her still. They're taking people that have documents. They're taking kids. They're doing all you guys, this this is where the world ends. There's nothing left. There's nothing left. They go snatch the president of Venezuela, but our fucking president is a sex offender. Yeah. Yeah. Why are we not the White House dragging him out by his fucking collar? That's where we gotta go, you guys, to White House. This is only gonna go so far. This is bullshit. This is bullshit, you guys. This is bullshit. You can just abort a baby.

@snoopsmom123 - Suzanne 🇺🇸♥️

@WallStreetApes When Joe Biden was a U.S. Senator, he talked about how dangerous “Sanctuary Cities,” are, and he said that he “Would Not Allow cities to ignore the Federal Law.” They’re the ones 👇 playing games with people’s lives. https://t.co/xIoQTZZT46

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 raises the question of whether cities should be allowed to ignore federal law regarding reporting of illegal immigrants and effectively provide sanctuary to immigrants. Speaker 1 responds by explaining that cities ignore federal law because there is no funding at the federal level to support the kind of enforcement required. He references the New York Times, noting that a city near his state implemented similar sanctions and subsequently experienced adverse effects—“their city went in the dumpster,” with stores closing and other consequences—leading to a policy reversal. He argues that the underlying issue is the need for a federal government capable of enforcing laws and asserts that the administration has been fundamentally derelict in not funding the requirements needed to enforce the existing laws. Speaker 0 follows up with a direct question to Senator Biden: yes or no—“Would you allow the cities to ignore the federal law?” Speaker 1 answers: No. Speaker 0 closes with a brief, informal remark: “You okay.”

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Would you allow these cities to ignore the federal law regarding the reporting of illegal immigrants and, in fact, provide sanctuary to these immigrants? Speaker 1: The reason the cities ignore the federal law is the fact that there is no funding federal level to provide for the kind of enforcement at the federal level you need. Pick up the New York Times today. There's a city not far across the river from my state that imposed a similar sanctions. And what they found out is, as a consequence of that, their city went in in the dumpster. Store started closing. Everything started to happen. And they changed the policy. Part of the problem is, you have to have a federal government that can enforce laws. This administration has been fundamentally derelict in not funding any of the requirements that are needed even to enforce the existing Speaker 0: senator Biden, yes or no? Would you allow the cities to ignore the federal law? Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: You okay.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 6, 2026 at 12:00 PM

Saved - January 7, 2026 at 5:34 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I heard Nick Shirley claim that Somalians block-by-block ballot harvest in Minnesota: one Somali collects all ballots for entire complexes—nine ballots per apartment—and submits them for Democrats with no tracking. A major, massive complex where one group votes for one candidate; one person collects ballots and there’s no tracking. He says 100,000+ people live rent-free, drive vehicles you paid for, eat food you paid for, and all vote together via ballot harvesting.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

🚨 Nick Shirley interview exposes Somalians go block to block ballot harvesting in Minnesota They’ll have 1 Somalian go collect all the ballots for entire complexes, sometimes ‘9 ballots’ per apartment home, and then submit them all for Democrats, “nobody tracks” WHAT IS THIS?!?! “Major massive apartment complex — That entire block will then go and vote for one specific candidate — They'll have one person go there and collect all the ballots and nobody tracks. They could say they have 9 people living in an apartment. They're going to send them 9 ballots and then they have someone who comes along and collects all the ballots.” “You're talking probably 100,000 or more people, and they're all living rent free. They're driving a vehicle that you paid for. They're eating food that you paid for. Everything they do is something that you paid for.” “They all vote together and there's ballot harvesting”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speakers discuss what they describe as a mass and opaque operation affecting elections. They claim that the total amount involved is “way beyond anybody’s imagination” and that neither the state nor the federal government knows it. They allege that a judge would bow to the head of the “Somalian mafia,” and describe the situation as a voting block whose members will vote together. They state that if someone does something against “our community,” they will vote for that person’s opponent, asserting that there is ballot harvesting and that they have witnessed it firsthand. The implication is that the voting bloc coordinates to influence election outcomes. They describe Cedar Riverside as a major, massive apartment complex and ask how many Somalis live there, noting that there are “one complex” and “20 more just like this around the Twin Cities,” totaling “probably a 100,000 or more people.” They claim these people are all Somali and are “living rent free.” They further claim they are driving vehicles paid for by others, eating food paid for by others, and that “they’re everything they do is something that you paid for,” implying that public funds or subsidies support them. The speakers allege that an entire block will vote for a single candidate, with “one person” going to collect all the ballots. They assert there is no tracking and that there could be multiple people living in an apartment, possibly nine ballots, with someone then “collect[ing] all the ballots.” The dialogue emphasizes a coordinated effort to manipulate voting outcomes through ballot collection and bloc voting, portraying the Somali community as organized to vote as a unified force in elections while alleging widespread use of ballot harvesting and ballot collection practices.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Here, and it's way beyond anybody's imagination, the total amount. The state doesn't even know. The feds don't even know. Speaker 1: And so for instance, Speaker 0: why would that judge bow down to the head of the Somalian mafia here? What I can tell you is that it's a voting block, and what they say is if you do something to go against our community, we're gonna vote for and they all vote together, and there's ballot harvesting. I've seen them do it, that we're gonna vote for your opponent unless you do what we tell Speaker 1: you to do. And so Speaker 0: it's all purely for votes. Yes. And so this building right here, Cedar Riverside, major massive apartment complex. How many Somalians do you think live in there, for instance? Well, this is just one complex. You've got 20 more just like this around the Twin Cities, and they're all Somali. You're talking probably a 100,000 or more people, and they're all living rent free. They're driving a vehicle that you paid for. They're eating food that you paid for. They're everything they do is is something that you paid for. And for instance, that entire block will then go and vote for one specific candidate. They'll have one person go there and collect all the ballots, and nobody tracks they could say they have nine people living in an apartment. They're gonna send them nine ballots. And then they have someone who comes along, collects Speaker 1: all Speaker 0: the ballots,

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 4, 2026 at 5:02 AM

Saved - January 4, 2026 at 6:07 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m noting four protests across NY, IL, FL, and MA with identical white signs in black letters, each made in under 24 hours. It looks paid and organized. Portland also had the same signs.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

CHECK THIS OUT They’re getting sloppy 4 protests in 4 different states, pay very close attention to solid white signs with black letter writing 4 protests in 4 different states all have the EXACT SAME signs made in under 24 hours Proof this is all PAID and ORGANIZED 1) New York City 2) Chicago Illinois 3) Orlando, Florida 4) Boston, Massachusetts I also checked the Portland, Oregons protest and they too have the same signs

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 4, 2026 at 12:26 AM

Saved - January 4, 2026 at 3:06 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I report that the Hands Off Venezuela protest in NYC for Maduro is organized by The People’s Forum. The NGO has received over $20 million from Neville Roy Singham, a Shanghai-based billionaire with CCP ties who funds media echoing Chinese state narratives.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

EXPOSED 🚨 The “Hands Off Venezuela” protest taking place in New York City supporting Nicolas Maduro is being organized by ‘The People’s Forum’ The People’s Forum is a NGO that has received over $20 million dollars from a billionaire who lives in China with ties to the CCP The NGOs primary funding over $20 million Neville Roy Singham - Singham’s residence in Shanghai. - His business ties are to the CCP - He attends CCP-related events - He funds media outlets echoing Chinese state narratives

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 3, 2026 at 5:55 PM

Saved - January 3, 2026 at 7:07 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I report that Democrat Congress Reps defend Maduro and condone Trump ordering strikes without congressional approval. Here are Biden-era strikes without approval: Yemen Jan 11–12, 2024: ~70 airstrikes on 60+ targets; Syria Feb 25, 2021: several facilities, 7 bombs on Iran-backed militias; Iraq Feb 2, 2024: part of ~85 targets; Syria Feb 2, 2024: part of ~85 targets; Yemen Jan 2024–Jan 2025: ongoing, hundreds. Totals: Yemen ~931 (US-UK), initial Yemen ~70; Syria ~10; Iraq/Syria ~85; no congressional approval.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Democrat Congress Reps are already defending Nicolas Maduro and condoning Donald Trump for ordering a military strikes ‘without Congressional Approval’ Here is every military strike done under Joe Biden without Congressional Approval: (170 military strikes) - Yemen: January 11-12, 2024 – Over 70 airstrikes on more than 60 Houthi targets - Syria: February 25, 2021 – Multiple facilities targeted, 7 bombs dropped on buildings used by Iran-backed militias - Iraq: February 2, 2024 – Part of over 85 targets struck - Syria: February 2, 2024 – Part of over 85 targets struck - Yemen: January 2024 to January 2025 – Ongoing campaign with multiple waves of strikes (hundreds of strikes) Total strikes: Yemen ~931 strikes (US-UK combined) Yemen initial (Jan 2024): ~70 Syria: ~10 (multiple facilities, 7 bombs) Iraq/Syria (Feb 2024): ~85 targets Zero congressional approval

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 1, 2026 at 10:52 PM

Saved - January 3, 2026 at 1:54 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I claim Jeffrey Epstein earned a Bear Stearns role in “complex transactions,” masking CIA weapons deals as financials in the Middle East. I say the DOJ let him off since it couldn’t air national security secrets. I link his rise to Ace Greenberg and BCCI, show ties to CIA, MI6, Saudi, Israeli, French intelligence, via the Safari Club Network, Iran–Iraq, and Afghanistan, with Bronfman and ongoing protection from fraud prosecutions.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Mike Benz exposes how Jeffrey Epstein was given a position at Bear Stearns His job was ‘complex transactions,’ he was “handling CIA disguising illegal weapon sales as complex financial transactions for commodities or oil” in the Middle East This couldn’t come out in court so the DOJ would always let him off “we just broke the entire Jeffrey Epstein story. If Ace Greenberg brought Jeffrey Epstein into the BCCI deals at Bear, that explains literally everything. It explains Jeffrey Epstein’s meteoric rise. It explains why everyone was so charmed by him. Hint, not because of his charm. It explains how in 1982 he’s already meeting with major CIA, MI6, Saudi intelligence officials. Douglas Leese, Stan Pottinger, Adnan Khashoggi, Middle Eastern sheikhs. Oh, it’s because he handled BCCI at Bear, handling CIA disguising illegal weapon sales as complex financial transactions for commodities or oil. That explains how Jeffrey Epstein got a specialty in complex financial transactions. Oh, because he got it because he was put on the BCCI account. That explains how he’s working with Edgar Bronfman because BCCI was helping US Saudi British but also Israeli interests in the Iran Iraq affair and in Afghanistan. That explains how he was protected every time he got in trouble with fraud. The Justice Department takes action against Jeffrey Epstein for securities fraud. These laws violations, Jeffrey Epstein openly says in court that Bear Stearns was actually secretly moving money for the CIA. Well, that can’t come out in open court. Okay, let’s not move forward with prosecution. Don’t wanna reveal national security secrets. That explains how Jeffrey Epstein has these French intelligence connection points, how Jeffrey Epstein has these British intelligence connection points, how he’s got these Israeli intelligence connection points. That explains how he’s got these Saudi intelligence connection points. And that definitely explains how he has all these CIA connection points. They’re all connected through the late 1970s Safari Club Network that then scaled up BCCI”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 contends that the entire Jeffrey Epstein story can be explained if Ace Greenberg brought Jeffrey Epstein into the BCCI deals at Bear Stearns. This, he says, would explain Epstein’s meteoric rise and why many were charmed by him, suggesting the charm was not genuine. He asserts that by 1982 Epstein was already meeting with major intelligence figures, including the CIA, MI6, and Saudi intelligence officials, as well as Doug Lee, Stan Pottinger, Adnan Khashoggi, and Middle Eastern sheiks. The claim is that Epstein handled BCCI at Bear Stearns, disguising illegal weapon sales as complex financial transactions for commodities or oil, which, he argues, explains Epstein’s specialty in complex financial transactions and why he was put on the BCCI account. The narrative connects Epstein’s work with Edgar Bronfman, claiming BCCI was helping US, Saudi, British, and Israeli interests in the Iran-Iraq affair and in Afghanistan. This, he says, explains how Epstein was protected whenever he encountered fraud trouble and that the justice department took action against him for securities violations, yet Epstein publicly stated in court that Bear Stearns was secretly moving money for the CIA, a claim he asserts cannot be disclosed in open court, hence the decision not to prosecute. Further, he claims Epstein had French intelligence connections, British intelligence connections, Israeli intelligence connections, and Saudi intelligence connections, all linked to his broader CIA connections. He ties these networks back to the Safari Club network of the late 1970s, which he says later scaled up into BCCI.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Guys, we just broke the entire Jeffrey Epstein story. If Ace Greenberg brought Jeffrey Epstein into the BCCI deals at bear, that explains literally everything. It explains Jeffrey Epstein's meteoric rise. It explains why everyone was so charmed by him. Hint, not because of his charm. It explains how in 1982, he's already meeting with major CIA, MI six, Saudi intelligence officials, Doug Lee, Stan Pottinger, Adnan Khashoggi, Middle Eastern sheiks. Oh, it's because he handled BCCI at bear handling CIA financing, disguising illegal weapon sales as complex financial transactions for commodities or oil. That explains how Jeffrey Epstein got a specialty in complex financial transactions. Oh, because he got it because he was put on the BCCI account. Well, that explains how he's working with Edgar Bronfman because BCCI was helping US, Saudi, British, but also Israeli interests in the Iran Iraq affair and in Afghanistan. That explains how he was protected every time he got in trouble with fraud. The justice department takes action against Jeffrey Epstein for securities laws violations. Jeffrey Epstein openly says in court that Bear Stearns was actually secretly moving money for the CIA. Well, that can't come out in open court. Okay? Let's not move forward with prosecution. Don't wanna reveal national national security secrets. That explains how Jeffrey Epstein has these French intelligence connection points. How Jeffrey Epstein has these British intelligence connection points. How he's got these Israeli intelligence connection points. That explains how he's got these Saudi intelligence connection points, and that definitely explains how he has all these CIA connection points. They're all through the late nineteen seventies, Safari Club network that then scaled up BCCI.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 1, 2026 at 7:53 AM

Saved - January 2, 2026 at 6:00 AM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

4,000 daycares were discovered in a 20 mile radius around Boston Massachusetts There are “clusters” of condos and homes that are registering themselves as daycares Americans can’t even fathom the theft and money laundering taking place nationwide. Why are any of us paying taxes https://t.co/NYHePh3XhM

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - December 31, 2025 at 12:00 PM

Saved - January 2, 2026 at 5:49 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I read that Abdi Daisane, a Somali immigrant running as a Democrat for Minnesota State Representative, owns a Minnesota daycare with alleged DHS violations: no equipment, materials, supervision, or license compliance; missing background checks; unsanitary conditions; no CPR or first-aid kits; no immunization records; insufficient staff; repeated violations. The post asks if this amounts to fraud.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOW 🚨 A Somalian immigrant named Abdi Daisane is running for Minnesota State Representative as a Democrat and you’ll never believe this, he owns a daycare in Minnesota The daycare has “a laundry list” of violations including not complying with DHS requests Violations include - No equipment - No materials - No supplies - No supervision for the kids - Not operating within the terms of their license - Never submitted their DHS background study when requested - Unsanitary conditions - Not complying with CPR regulations - No first aid kits - No furnishings - No documents to show that the teachers were qualified to do the job - No immunization records for any of the children - Not enough staff - Same violations happen over and over and over Sure sounds like fraud doesn’t it….

Video Transcript AI Summary

Abdi, running for Minnesota House District 14A, owns Blooming Kids Child Care. The speaker highlights a long list of alleged violations at Blooming Kids, including: - No first aid kits - Unsanitary conditions - Not complying with CPR regulations - No supervision for the kids - Not operating within the terms of their license - Never submitted their DHS background study when requested - Children subjected to prohibited disciplinary actions - No furnishings, no equipment, no materials, and no supplies - No documents to show that the teachers were qualified to do the job - Repeated violations: same violations happen over and over - No immunization records for any of the children - Not enough staff The speaker notes they cannot determine how much state or federal funding Blooming Kids receives because that information requires access they don’t have. Regarding campaign fundraising, the speaker checked Abdi’s campaign donations and states he is not getting any from any day care centers. The speaker concludes by asking someone to tag Nick Shirley, suggesting he should look into this issue as well.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Meet Abdi. He is running for Minnesota House District 14 A, and I bet you'll never guess what type of business Abdi owns. Blooming Kids Child Care. And I did a little research on Blooming Kids, and they have quite the laundry list of violations as well, just like the other ones that we were looking at. And over the years, they've been violated for no first aid kits, unsanitary conditions, not complying with CPR regulations, no supervision for the kids, not operating within the terms of their license. They never submitted their DHS background study when requested. Children were subjected to prohibited disciplinary actions. No furnishings, no equipment, no materials, and no supplies. No documents to show that the teachers were qualified to do the job. Same violations happen over and over and over. No immunization records for any of the children. Not enough staff. So I'm not able to see how much money that this particular day care center is getting from the state or the federal government because that needs to be done by somebody who has access to that information, which I don't. I did look up his campaign fund donations, and he's not getting any from any day care centers. So so if somebody can tag Nick Shirley, let him know that he should probably look into this one too.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 1, 2026 at 8:56 PM

Saved - January 2, 2026 at 5:00 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I hear Senator Trey Stewart claim Democrats began kickbacks in the Obama era, continued into Biden, and spread to governors and local officials. He says fraud is by design, a system created by the left for their social circles—top federal, then state, then local. He cites Walz, Mills, Maine, Minnesota, calls it the tip of the iceberg and warns of financial Armageddon.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Senator Trey Stewart says Democrats began creating kickback schemes during the Barack Obama Admin and it has continued into the Biden Admin and goes on with Democrat Governors He says they all are absolutely financially benefiting and getting kickbacks “Fraud by design. This wasn't an accident. This didn't just happen. It's a system that's designed by the left for people in their social circles - It starts all the way at the top with the federal government with the Barack Obama administration, - Promulgated even more by the Biden administration - It runs down to the states, to governors across the country, including Governor Walz and Governor Mills - Even at the local level You see the bad actors, you read the headlines, you see what's happening right here in Maine, certainly in Minnesota, and I would agree with what's been said so far that this is just the tip of the iceberg, folks. — Financial Armageddon. That's what we're heading for”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 asserts that there are two F’s that come to mind: fraud by design and financial Armageddon. - Fraud by design: This, according to Speaker 0, was not an accident or a happenstance event. It is described as a system that is designed by the left for people in their social circles. The claim traces the system back to the top of the federal government, beginning with the Obama administration and being promulgated even more by the Biden administration. It is said to run down to the states, including governors across the country, specifically naming governors Waltz and Mills. The speaker also mentions the local level, noting bad actors and headlines in Maine and Minnesota. The overarching assertion is that this situation is “the tip of the iceberg.” - Financial Armageddon: The second F is financial Armageddon. Speaker 0 argues that if the Trump administration does not take the issue seriously, listeners are “probably on another planet.” The speaker contends that the problem will have implications for the state of Maine amounting to “billions with a b of dollars,” and that this will spell financial Armageddon for the state. The speaker emphasizes the urgent need to get a handle on the problem. In sum, Speaker 0 portrays a systemic, politically driven pattern of fraud across federal, state, and local levels, described as the tip of the iceberg, and projects drastic financial consequences for Maine unless the issue is addressed, asserting that the Trump administration is serious about taking action.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Two F's come to mind. The first being fraud by design. This wasn't an accident. This didn't just happen. It's a system that's designed by the left for people in their social circles. It starts all the way at the top of the federal government with the Obama administration, promulgated even more by the Biden administration. It runs down to the states, the governors across the country, including governors Waltz and governor Mills. And even at the local level, you see the bad actors, you read the headlines, you see what's happening right here in Maine, certainly in Minnesota, and I would agree with what's been said so far that this is just the tip of the ice berg, folks. The other f is financial Armageddon. That's what we're heading for. If you don't think that the Trump administration is serious about getting a handle on this, you're probably on another planet. This is going to have implications for the state of Maine in the billions with a b of dollars. This will spell financial Armageddon for our state. We have got to get a handle on this problem.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - January 1, 2026 at 7:53 AM

Saved - January 1, 2026 at 2:47 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

WallStreetApes claims 4,000 daycares within a 20-mile radius of Boston, with condo clusters registering as daycares, alleging nationwide theft, money laundering, and tax avoidance. Persistant_Wolf responds by mocking a Somali woman reacting to fraud claims.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

4,000 daycares were discovered in a 20 mile radius around Boston Massachusetts There are “clusters” of condos and homes that are registering themselves as daycares Americans can’t even fathom the theft and money laundering taking place nationwide. Why are any of us paying taxes https://t.co/NYHePh3XhM

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker describes a pattern of fraud concentrated in clusters rather than in isolated, large-scale operations. The fraud appears to occur within family groups or tightly connected networks, spreading across multiple small sites rather than a single, massive operation. These clusters involve using single apartments, single condos, or potentially a single-family home outside of Boston, effectively creating numerous small daycare facilities. The speaker notes that the capacity of these clusters is not as high as it might be in other regions (e.g., Minnesota). As a result, fraud operates at a large number of smaller sites rather than a few large ones. The implication is that there may be more individual perpetrators overall, but each site commits fraud on a smaller scale. This distributed approach contrasts with a hypothetical scenario in which one building or site would generate a multi-million-dollar fraud; instead, the speaker expects many buildings each contributing smaller amounts, culminating in a broader spread of fraudulent activity. A key factor driving this pattern is the very low barrier to entry for opening a daycare, which facilitates a large number of potential operators and, consequently, a higher overall opportunity for fraud. The speaker emphasizes that this low barrier makes it easier for fraudulent actors to multiply across numerous small locations, contributing to a wide but shallow trafficking of schemes. The speaker explains the financial impact and mechanism of the fraud: the state is subsidizing payments for these kids, but the fraud involves both the daycare and the parents allegedly claiming that children attend the daycare when they do not. In reality, the parents certify attendance, while the daycare providers and the parents are allegedly splitting the subsidized funds. As a result, taxpayers bear the burden of subsidizing services that are not actually being provided to the claimed attendees. In summary, the described fraud occurs in clustered groups, leveraging many small daycare operations (often housed in single residences) with a very low entry barrier, leading to widespread but not individually vast fraud. The purported scheme involves falsified attendance to obtain state subsidies, with the daycare operators and some parents allegedly sharing the ill-gotten funds.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Oh, a lot has happened in the course of the last couple of hours. I think the majority of the fraud is happening in clusters within the same either family members or groups of people or whatever it may be. And it's all happening at a it's it's it's not very deep, but it's very wide, if that makes sense. So I think that what's happening is it's happening in clusters. And these are clusters of of, let's say, you know, condos or multifamily homes or whatever it is, and what is happening and I'm gonna find it, by the way. And what's happening is they are all using these single apartments, single condos, or potentially even a single family home if it's really outside of Boston. They're using those as the daycares. That's that's what's happening. Okay? And their their capacity is not the same as it is in, Minnesota. That that's just the fact. So I think it's happening at scale with a smaller capacity. But so so there's probably more people committing fraud at a smaller scale, if that makes sense. So, like, you're not gonna have one building that is committing $5,000,000 in fraud, but you might have 50 buildings that are committing $1,000,000 in fraud. That is going to be the difference between Massachusetts and a place like Minneapolis because, again, the barrier to entry to open a day care is very, very low, which provides the barrier to entry for fraud to be very, very, very high. And it's very unfortunate because who gets stuck with the bill? We do. What they these businesses are doing is that they're charging the low the state basically to to subsidize the payments for these kids that are not even showing up there. The parents are saying that the kids are showing up there, and then both the daycare and the parent allegedly are splitting the money. This is happening.

@Persistant_Wolf - Wolf Of The West

@WallStreetApes This Somali woman reads “fraud is bad” and immediately panics https://t.co/V4DNC1QHQ1

Video Transcript AI Summary

First speaker: says "Calcula is cut. I'm unable to work or go to school. I understand. Fraud is bad." Second speaker: says "I'm sure what happened there at the end trade. I admit that she thought that was not supposed to be in there, but fraud is bad, and it's it's a bad issue publicly with the gun types in Minnesota."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Calcula is cut. I'm unable to work or go to school. I understand. Fraud is bad. Speaker 1: I'm sure what happened there at the end trade. I admit that she thought that was not supposed to be in there, but fraud is bad, and it's it's a bad issue publicly with the gun types in Minnesota.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - December 30, 2025 at 10:00 PM

Saved - December 31, 2025 at 5:55 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

It’s been 345 days since Trump’s inauguration and Republicans took control of the Presidency, House, and Senate. They still won’t pass the Save Act for nationwide voter ID. Illegals are buying licenses and SS cards on Facebook Marketplace to vote, exposed by Savanah Hernandez over a year ago, and we still don’t have voter ID.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

It has been 345 days since Donald Trump was inaugurated and Republicans took control of the Presidency, House and Senate 345 days and the GOP still won’t pass the Save Act to mandate nationwide Voter ID Illegals are buying Drivers Licenses and Social Security cards from Facebook Marketplace which they can then use to vote, that’s how out of control fraud is in America This was exposed by Savanah Hernandez over a year ago and we still can’t get voter ID

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - December 28, 2025 at 5:14 AM

Saved - December 29, 2025 at 6:54 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

This is why I believe no NGO money launderers ever go to jail. Elon Musk confirms taxpayer funds to fake NGOs are used to buy mansions and private jets, with fake NGOs paying themselves lavish salaries and expensing everything—living like kings on the taxpayer dime.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is why no NGO money launderers never go to jail Elon Musk CONFIRMS the taxpayer money politicians and bureaucrats are sending to fake NGOs are being used to purchase themselves MANSIONS AND PRIVATE JETS “A fake NGO — they then give themselves extremely lavish, insane salaries, expense everything to the nonprofit, buy jets and homes and all sorts of things” “Live like kings and queens on the taxpayer dime.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The transcript asserts that the government can provide funding to a so called nonprofit with very few controls, and that there is no auditing subsequently of that nonprofit. It emphasizes that with the 1,900,000,000.0 to Stacey Abrams, those involved “give themselves extremely lavish, like, salaries, expense everything” and that the nonprofit is used to “buy jets and homes and all sorts of things” and to “live like kings and queens” within the tax paradigm. The speaker reiterates that this pattern is not isolated to a single instance but is happening at scale. It is described as not being limited to one or two cases but as something being seen “everywhere.” Key points highlighted include: - Government funding to nonprofits occurs with very few controls. - There is an absence of auditing of the recipient nonprofit after the funding is provided. - A substantial amount, specifically 1,900,000,000.0, is directed to a high-profile figure identified as Stacey Abrams. - The recipients are portrayed as granting themselves lavish salaries, paying for expenses, and purchasing luxury assets such as jets and homes. - The overall implication is that funds are used to “buy jets and homes and all sorts of things,” leading to a lifestyle described as living “like kings and queens” within the tax framework. - The speaker stresses that this phenomenon is not isolated but is happening at scale, with examples seen “everywhere.” The speaker’s framing centers on alleged governance and accountability failures in nonprofit funding, pointing to large sums of money directed to an individual and the perceived use of nonprofit resources for personal luxury. The emphasis is on the scale of the practice and the lack of oversight, suggesting systemic repetition rather than isolated incidents.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The government can give money to a so called nonprofit with with very few controls, and then that and there's there's no auditing subsequently of that nonprofit. So there's no so so this is where with the, you know, 1,900,000,000.0 to Stacey Abrams, who's who's they they then give themselves extremely lavish, like, salaries, expense everything Yep. To to the nonprofit, you know, buy jets and homes and all sorts of things. Link live like kings and queens Yes. On the tax paradigm. Correct. You you mentioned And this is happening at scale. It's not just one or two. We're seeing this everywhere.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - December 27, 2025 at 10:31 PM

Saved - December 29, 2025 at 6:00 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I read claims that Stacey Abrams founded an NGO that supposedly received $2 billion from the Biden administration 30 days after its founding, and that she has not returned any money. The piece says the NGO has not been required to repay any portion of the funds. It also quotes Elon Musk alleging there are many similar fraud cases and criticizes loud complainers as fake righteousness.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Stacey Abrams founded an NGO and 30 days later was sent $2 billion dollars by the Biden Admin As of today, December 27, 2025 she has not had to give a single penny back Again, the Stacey Abrams NGO has not been required to return any portion of the $2 billion fund Elon Musk confirms there are MANY cases similar to the Stacey Abrams NGO fraud “The fraudsters — Like the $2 billion to Stacey Abrams NGO, that basically doesn't exist and suddenly gets $2 billion awarded from the federal government. Why? There are MANY such cases like that” “The, you know, who complains the loudest and the, with the, the most amount of fake righteous indignation. The frauds

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker argues that the loudest complainers and the most fake righteous indignation come from fraudsters. They claim there are NGOs, including a Stacey Abrams NGO, that “basically didn't exist” yet were suddenly awarded $2,000,000,000 from the federal government. Stacey Abrams reportedly asks, “why?” The speaker notes there are many such cases.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The you know who complains the loudest and the with the the most amount of fake righteous indignation? The fraudsters. That's it's a tell. These the NGOs that are crazy. Like, the the $2,000,000,000 to Stacey Abrams NGO that basically didn't exist and suddenly gets $2,000,000,000 awarded from the federal government. She says, why? And there are many such cases like that.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - September 19, 2025 at 4:25 AM

Saved - December 27, 2025 at 10:07 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A participant questions Palantir’s origins, citing Whitney Webb on it starting as a DARPA project later privatized to bypass constitutional protections. Another participant claims Palantir is quietly acquiring 9-1-1 response agencies to centralize emergency services and act as the intermediary for assistance.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is insane ‌ Whitney Webb gives a history of Palantir ‌ Palantir essentially started as a DARPA project. It was going to completely destroy our constitutional protections so it was quietly taken out of government and rebranded as a private company to do the same thing https://t.co/sJl3wiQktX

@Humannoyed_b - Humannoyed_b

@WallStreetApes Palantir is quietly buying up all the 9-11 response agencies to consolidate them. Soon, they will be the middle man between you and emergency assistance. https://t.co/Tf90Ela1wg

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - September 19, 2025 at 4:25 AM

Saved - December 27, 2025 at 9:50 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This is insane ‌ Whitney Webb gives a history of Palantir ‌ Palantir essentially started as a DARPA project. It was going to completely destroy our constitutional protections so it was quietly taken out of government and rebranded as a private company to do the same thing https://t.co/sJl3wiQktX

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - December 27, 2025 at 3:30 PM

Saved - December 27, 2025 at 7:24 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Muslim man say Sharia Law will come to every nation on earth “Do you think at some point there's gonna be Sharia law everywhere?” Muslim “100%, this is my goal and every Muslim's goal” He openly says there are 2 choices, Islam or Death “There's two choices, Islam or death” https://t.co/hADMvP89bF

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 asks if at some point there will be sharia law everywhere. Speaker 1 replies, “Percent. This is my goal and every Muslim's goal.” Speaker 0 acknowledges the idea of establishing sharia law on earth and asks what would happen to someone like them who is a murtad and believes they should be killed under sharia if such law is universal. Speaker 1 states that the decision is “up to the army.” Speaker 0 questions whether it would be fair under Islamic law for someone to be killed simply because they arrived at the wrong conclusion, asserting they would be killed for being a murtad, and asks if that would be fair. Speaker 1 reiterates, “In the Sharia law, that's what I follow,” and that if sharia is universal, the speaker would follow that rule. Speaker 0 challenges the fairness of a system where their safety hinges on adherence to sharia, noting that if Islam dominates all of earth, there would be no safe haven for them. Speaker 1 confirms this by saying, “That's the plan. And you where.” Speaker 0 asks where their safe haven would be if all of earth is under Islam, and suggests that safety would have to come from Islam itself. Speaker 1 responds that safety would be found within Islam, implying it would be by force if necessary. Speaker 0 contends that safe haven would require conversion to Islam, and if they do not return to Islam, punishment would be death. Speaker 1 concludes that there are two choices, then says “Slam or death,” indicating the binary outcome under the stated framework.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You think at some point there's gonna be sharia law everywhere? Speaker 1: Percent. This is my goal and every Muslim's goal. Speaker 0: And you think Establish sharia law on earth. Okay. But when there is sharia law on earth, then somebody like me should be killed? Because I am a murtad. Speaker 1: It's up to the army. Speaker 0: But it's under Islamic law, says that I should be killed. So you think that's okay? Speaker 1: In the Sharia law, that's what I follow. Speaker 0: But do you think that's fair for me? Like, let's say you're right, I'm wrong. Do you think it's fair to kill me because I I got the conclusions right wrong? Speaker 1: If Sharia law states that, then it should be fair for me. There's always a safe haven for you under Sharia law. Speaker 0: No. Because you said Sharia law on everywhere on earth, so there's not gonna be any safe haven for me. If it all earth if if Islam dominates all of all of earth. Speaker 1: That's the plan. And you where Speaker 0: I would where would be my safe haven? Speaker 1: In Islam. Speaker 0: But that would be by force then, wouldn't it? If if if if my only safe haven is by Islam, and if I don't go back to Islam, punishment is death. Speaker 1: So there's two choices. Then Slam or death?

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - December 27, 2025 at 2:51 AM

Saved - December 27, 2025 at 6:53 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I read that Portland, Oregon spent over $1.5 billion on homelessness in the past two years, with a 60% rise in homeless people. I read Houston, Texas spent $72 million and saw a 60% drop. Democrats are laundering money.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

These numbers are 100% accurate Portland Oregon spent over $1.5 billion in the past 2 years on homelessness, and the homeless population rose by 60% Houston Texas spent a small fraction of that amount of money ($72M) on homelessness and their homeless population reduced by 60% Democrats are laundering money

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker states that the city of Portland, Oregon has spent over $1,500,000,000 in the past two years on homelessness, and that the homeless population has risen by 60%. In contrast, Houston, Texas, a significantly larger city, has spent a small fraction of that amount on homelessness and managed to reduce their homeless population by 60% in the same period. The speaker expresses ongoing astonishment that information points to the state government as at least incompetent, and likely corrupt, but asserts that there will still be Oregonians who vote yes to raise taxes and give them more money.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The city of Portland, Oregon has spent over $1,500,000,000 in the past two years on homelessness, and the homeless population has risen by 60%. In that same time frame, a significantly larger city, Houston, Texas, has spent a small fraction of that amount of money on homelessness and managed to reduce their homeless population by 60%. It's never going to stop amazing me how every single piece of information out there is pointing to the fact that our state government is, in the very least, completely incompetent, but more likely full of corruption, but there will still be Oregonians who will vote yes to raise our taxes and give them more money.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - December 24, 2025 at 2:23 AM

Saved - December 24, 2025 at 9:39 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I say that California taxpayers aren’t the only ones paying: the entire country is. I claim Newsom created a 1:1 federal funding loop for noncitizen healthcare, with $9.6 billion spent this year. I insist the media lies by saying no federal dollars go to illegals; emergency department coverage is backfilled one-for-one with federal funds, so ER use draws federal dollars.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

California Assemblyman confirms illegals are receiving healthcare and not only are California taxpayers paying to it but the entire country is Gavin Newsom created a loophole to get 1:1 funding from the federal government on noncitizen healthcare “This past year, we spent $9.6 billion on illegal immigrant health care —The media has actually been lying to people saying that no federal dollars goes to illegal. That is fundamentally wrong.” “Then what most people don't realize are the games that they're playing because we expanded Medi-Cal access towards emergency departments. Emergency departments are actually backfilled and funded one for one dollars from the federal government. So if an illegal immigrant uses the emergency room at all, they are bringing in federal dollars that are being spent on them.” “So it is a lie when they say that there are, there is no federal dollars going to illegal immigrants. California is doing it. The media is lying to you.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker asserts that last year California spent $9.6 billion on health care for illegal immigrants. They claim the media has misled people by saying that no federal dollars go to undocumented immigrants, stating that this is fundamentally wrong. The speaker points to Governor Newsom, who allegedly announced that California is the first state in the nation to provide health care to illegal immigrants. They also claim that San Francisco operates the only universal health care plan in America for all undocumented residents, expressing pride in that status. According to the speaker, a key mechanism behind federal funding for care provided to undocumented individuals is the expansion of medical access through emergency departments. They contend that emergency departments are backfilled and funded at a rate of one dollar from the federal government. The implication is that any time an illegal immigrant uses the emergency room, federal dollars are brought in to cover or support that care, effectively meaning there are federal dollars being spent on illegal immigrants. The speaker asserts that the statement that there are no federal dollars going to illegal immigrants is a lie, arguing that California is facilitating this funding. They also claim that the media is lying about this issue as well. Throughout the statement, the overarching themes are the existence of substantial state spending on undocumented health care, the involvement of federal funding through emergency department backfill, and the portrayal of these facts as being misrepresented by the media. In summary, the speaker emphasizes four main points: (1) California’s reported $9.6 billion expenditure on health care for undocumented immigrants, (2) Governor Newsom’s assertion that California is leading the nation in providing health care to illegal immigrants, (3) San Francisco’s universal health care plan for all undocumented residents, and (4) the mechanism by which emergency department funding from the federal government allegedly backfills care for undocumented individuals, leading to federal dollars being spent on them. The speaker concludes by asserting that the claim of no federal dollars supporting illegal immigrants is false and accuses the media of lying.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This past year, we spent $9,600,000,000 on illegal immigrant health care. Oh my god. The media has actually been lying to people saying that no federal dollars goes to illegals. That is fundamentally wrong. Governor Newsom came out last week and actually said, we are the first state in the nation to provide illegal immigrants health care. San Francisco is the only universal health care plan for all undocumented residents in America. Very proud of that. And then what most people don't realize are the games that they're playing because we expanded medical access towards emergency departments. Emergency departments are actually backfilled and funded one for $1 from the federal government. So if an illegal immigrant uses the emergency room at all, they are bringing in federal dollars that are being spent on them. So it is a lie when they say that there are there is no federal dollars going to illegal immigrants. California is doing it. The media is lying too.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - December 21, 2025 at 5:40 AM

Saved - December 24, 2025 at 7:27 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I say California’s homelessness money is going to NGOs whose executives earn up to $500k a year. LA spent $13 billion last year on homelessness, and that money went to these nonprofits. It’s my money and my parents’ money—hardworking Californians’ taxes. I’m sick of it, and seeing the ground reality in California has made me question left-wing ideology.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Ana Kasparian Exposes where the money California is spending on homelessness is going It’s being funneled into NGO’s & Executives are making $500k a year each “Just experiencing what I've seen on the ground in California has made me question a lot about left wing ideology” “We spent $13 billion in Los Angeles alone last year to combat homelessness. You wanna know where that money went? That money went to these trash nonprofits who have a bunch of executives making half a million a year. You're working for a nonprofit dealing with homelessness. That's my money. That's my parents' money. Okay, that is the hardworking people of California paying incredibly high taxes that go to what? So, yeah. I'm sick of it. I'm sick of it and honestly just experiencing what I've seen on the ground in California has made me question a lot about left wing ideology.”

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - December 23, 2025 at 6:39 AM

Saved - December 24, 2025 at 7:51 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I understand claims that California Democrats and Mayor Karen Bass’s administration altered the Pacific Palisades after-action report and deleted evidence to shield themselves from liability. Rick Caruso called it a “massive cover-up” or Firegate, alleging deliberate changes to shield the LA Fire Department and leadership from January 7 failures, including the January 1 reignition and officers being ordered off. He says those references were deleted, implying a lack of accountability, with an LA Times investigation confirming this.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

It is now CONFIRMED California Democrats and Mayor Karen Bass’ administration CHANGED the Pacific Palisades ‘after action report’ and DELETED EVIDENCE in order to shield themselves from liability Rick Caruso “A massive cover-up, Firegate. A deliberate effort to cover up the findings in the after-action report by changing the after-action report. This was deliberately and intentionally done to shield LA Fire Department, Mayor Bass, and her administration from the failures of the fires on January 7th. The type of changes that were made include the fact that the earlier fire on January 1 reignited on January 7 and the fire department officers were ordered off the area. They deleted all of those references from the after action report. This is an intentional cover-up to reduce accountability, the lack of transparency. The culture of corruption, in the city of Los Angeles is despicable and is out of control. Mayor Bass and her administration and the leadership of the fire department should be held accountable.“ Confirmed by LA Times investigation

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - December 22, 2025 at 4:10 PM

Saved - December 22, 2025 at 5:42 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I read leaked plans from a freshman education course at the University of Illinois. The professor turned the course into an indoctrination seminar, training 1st-year education majors to prioritize equity, LGBTQ+ issues, privileged identities, and preferred pronouns as a graduation requirement. The curriculum, “Identity and Difference in Education,” centers on identity in schooling, power, privilege, and inclusion, using asset-based and identity-affirming frameworks.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Leaked lesson plans from a freshman education course at the University of Illinois The professor turned the “course into an indoctrination seminar” 1st year education majors were trained to prioritize equity, LGBTQ+ issues, privileged identities and preferred pronouns This is all a requirement to graduate “Identity and Difference in Education” Curriculum - Focuses on identity in schooling and how identity is socially constructed - Analyzes inclusion, exclusion, power, and privilege in education - Examines power, privilege, and equity across identities - Explores “asset-based” and identity-affirming frameworks

View Full Interactive Feed