reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @WallStreetApes
reSee.it AI Summary
Chaos as I see Canada’s government slip an omnibus budget bill that exempts themselves from FOIA. Records on cabinet ministers, parliamentary assistants, and their offices are now largely exempt from FOI requests. Holy shit.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Chaos and yelling as government in Canada makes themselves EXEMPT form Freedom of Information Act requests An omnibus budget bill secretly included a statute exempting themselves from FOIA requests Records on cabinet ministers, parliamentary assistants, and their offices inducing staff are now largely exempt from FOI requests Holy sh*t
Video Transcript AI Summary
The debate centers on changes to Ontario’s Freedom of Information (FOI) rules embedded in the budget bill. The motion passes, with the ayes 57 and nays 33, and is declared carried. Opposition MPs denounce the vote as the FOI changes being rushed and retroactive, arguing they will limit public and media access to government documents and effectively shield records involving Premier Ford and his cabinet from scrutiny. The changes were fast-tracked after a late-night legislative session, bypassing the normal committee review that would ordinarily allow public input before proposals are enacted.
Speaker 0 frames the outcome by asserting that rights are not being taken away and that the public will still have substantial access; he promises continued transparency and accountability, including quarterly reports on spending. He says that information access remains broad, with tools available for the public to scrutinize government actions.
Speaker 2 notes Premier Ford’s claim that 95% of information would remain accessible while 5% could be redacted to protect personal data, but points to disputes over whether some information would still be accessible and under what circumstances. He highlights concerns that the FOI changes could limit scrutiny despite the stated intent to protect personal information.
Opposition voices, including the NDP and Liberal leaders, criticize the move as undermining democracy. One speaker states, “Democracy dies in darkness,” arguing the budget bill is being used to hide government actions from Ontarians. The concern is that the changes would reduce transparency not only for the premier’s government but for all governments and all parties, affecting the public service and how billions of dollars are accounted for each year.
Speaker 3 emphasizes the need for the public to know how the government uses the funds it receives annually, underscoring the role of FOI in keeping government accountable.
The session notes that today’s vote occurred as the legislature plans a break tomorrow and a recess for the entire next week. Liberal leaders indicate they will use that time to propose additional motions to revisit and reopen debate on FOI provisions, attempting to block or modify the changes. They plan to bring more motions to surface the issue and seek greater public discussion and scrutiny, aiming to stop the FOI changes from taking effect.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The
Speaker 1: ayes being 57, the nays being 33. I declare the motion carried.
Speaker 2: MPPs from the opposition yelling shame and FOI while the vote was taking place. That's why members of the Ford government voted in favor of the FOI changes and the rest of the budget bill. The FOI law will limit public and media access to certain government documents, effectively keeping records and information and data involving premier Ford, his cabinet from scrutiny, and that's going to be retroactive as well. So any requests that have been made before now may not come forward. The new legislation would normally go to a committee.
The public would have a chance to weigh in at that point before any proposed changes. But after a late night session in the legislature last night, that was fast tracked to a vote today, and it's gone forward.
Speaker 0: We're not taking people's rights. You folks will have lots of access. You have lots of tools. That will continue. We'll continue to debate bills in the house.
We are gonna continue to I'm out every ninety days telling the people how I spent their money.
Speaker 2: Premier Ford has, throughout all of this, said that 95% of information would still be accessible and that it would be limited to 5% that wouldn't be made public. However, there has been dispute over that, and the idea that some information would still be made available. He's talking about how it would be to protect personal information. That's the type of information that would be redacted at that point and wouldn't be made available anyway. So there's lots of dispute over that.
And, of course, the opposition leaders, both the NDP and the liberal had something to say about that as well.
Speaker 1: Democracy dies in darkness, and this government has used their budget bill, and I will say budgets are moral documents. They have used their budget bill as a way to do to hide from the people of Ontario.
Speaker 3: People of Ontario aren't gonna know what's going on in their government, and it's not just for the premier's government. It's for all governments. It's for all parties. It's for all people working in the public service. Right?
That's why we have those things so people know how the government is using the billions of dollars that they send them they send to government every year.
Speaker 2: So the vote happened today as a result of the legislature taking another break tomorrow and all next week before returning. However, the Liberal Party has said at that point they plan on trying to introduce more motions to bring the FOI back to the surface to try and have more debate and can and see what more they can do to try and stop this from happening.
reSee.it AI Summary
I say RFK Jr claims it wasn’t 400, but 500 hospices shut down in Los Angeles. He alleges none called to complain; 100% were fraud. These fake California hospices created fake addresses, then would approach poor neighborhoods and pay residents $600 flat-screen TVs in exchange for their patient IDs. They billed taxpayers thousands per patient, also paid for lists of patients, and began billing for them. Not a single California Democrat has been held accountable.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
RFK Jr says it wasn’t 400 hospices they shut down in Los Angeles, it was 500 He confirms not a single one has called to complain, 100% were fraud These fake California hospices made fake addresses, then would go to poor neighborhoods and buy residents $600 flat screen TVs, in exchange they would give them their patient identification These fraudulent hospice companies would then bill thousands of dollars to taxpayers for each one They would also pay for lists of patients too and begin billing for them Not a single California Democrat has been held accountable
Video Transcript AI Summary
We've shut down 500 hospices in Los Angeles. Incidentally, we haven't had one call from Congress or anybody else about complaining because clearly, these were fraudulent. A lot of these places, you'd say, they'd have, they were just invented addresses. They would obtain patient identification or they would pay people. They were going and giving people in poor neighborhoods flat screen televisions $600 and then they would enlist them and enroll them in the hospice and we were paying them $6,000.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've already shut down 500 hospices in Los Angeles. And and incidentally, we haven't had one call from congress or anybody else about complaining because clearly, these were fraudulent. A lot of these places, you'd say, they'd have, they were just invented addresses. They would obtain patient identification or they would pay people. They were going and giving people in poor neighborhoods flat screen televisions $600 and then they would enlist them and enroll them in the hospice and we were paying them $6,000.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Georgia Court of Appeals ruled for Sandersville Railroad, enabling a private eminent-domain seizure of family farmland—some held by Black families with roots dating to slavery—for a quarry spur. Families call it an abuse of government power for private gain and will take the case to the Supreme Court. A responder argues the decision amounts to a corporate takeover, says the use isn’t public, and warns descendants to take notice of possible SCOTUS involvement.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
The Georgia Court of Appeals just sided with Sandersville Railroad, giving the private company the power to take family farmland Land that has been with families since the civil war, including some Black families whose ancestors farmed the land dating back to slavery times must be given to the railroad Families and farmers say this is a ‘an abuse of eminent domain: a private company using government power to take land primarily for its own benefit’ They plan to fight it in the Supreme Court
@JLHunter1984 - J. L. Hunter
@WallStreetApes They didn’t just lose in court. They got railroaded by a fckin railroad. Eminent domain for a quarry spur isn’t public use...it's corporate takeover. Every farmer, every homeowner, every descendant of anyone who worked this soil just got put on notice. SCOTUS? You notice? 🇺🇸
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that smoke detectors in bathrooms and public schools have built‑in microphones and sensors to monitor speech patterns, count occupants, and analyze aggression. They can be programmed to pick up keywords and could be configured to detect discussions about specific topics.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Smoke detectors in bathrooms and public schools are capable of monitoring speech patterns “These are sold for public safety, especially in education” The smoke detectors have built in microphones and censors that can tell how many people are in the room, analyzes the speech patterns to determine aggressive behavior They can by programmed to pick up key words Which means, they could be programmed to pick up someone talking about something specific…
reSee.it AI Summary
I live 1.6 miles from the META Data Center in Wisconsin. My water system is destroyed. Discharge turns the Beaver Dam Creek white like milk; testing shows high heavy metals, including elevated strontium. For almost 50 years a natural creek on my horse farm, 20 feet wide and up to four feet deep, flowed through a connected groundwater system. Since upstream construction, it stops without rainfall and returns opaque with force, causing drastic erosion.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Woman who lives only 1.6 miles from the META Data Center in Wisconsin speaks out She says their water system has been completely destroyed She says there is discharge that turns the entire river white like milk. She paid for testing and found extremely high heavy metal levels “I live on a horse farm and I am an educator. I, for almost four 50 years, a natural creek has flowed through my property. It's 20 feet wide, up to four feet deep. It has persisted through drought, flood, seasonal change. It's part of a connected system. Groundwater, tributaries, watersheds, aquifers ultimately flowing into Beaver Dam Lake. Until construction began upstream on the data center, its behavior was stable and predictable After construction started, all of that changed. Here in Beaver Dam, the creek began to stop flowing entirely without rainfall. It would abruptly return off in cloudy and opaque like milk, with enough force to cause drastic erosion and damage — Water testing on my property shows elevated strontium, a very dangerous metal, and other indicators consistent with deep groundwater influence”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Miley Kaczynski, a lifelong Wisconsin resident living 1.6 miles downstream from the Meta Data Center in Beaver Dam, describes dramatic changes to a natural creek on her horse farm that have followed upstream construction. The creek, a 20-foot-wide, up-to-four-feet-deep waterway, had flowed reliably for decades as part of a connected system feeding into Beaver Dam Lake, until construction began upstream. Since then, the creek has stopped flowing even without rainfall, often returning only during brief wet periods, and when it does flow, it is sometimes cloudy and erodes the banks. This pattern has repeated dozens of times over a single construction season, leaving the creek dry half the time. Dust from construction covers her yard, turning grass white, and heavy dust plumes make her unable to see the hood of her truck while driving past the site. She notes this behavior is not consistent with natural variability or weather patterns and had never happened before.
Kaczynski attempted to report these concerns to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), but found the system fragmented: reports are passed between departments and some are lost. She learned there is no single entity responsible for downstream impacts when large-scale construction disrupts a water system. Different permits govern activities locally, at the county and state levels, and some at the federal level. She emphasizes that this is a policy failure, not a failure of individual agency staff. She asserts that the law favors businesses over residents and that the creek’s flow appears correlated with upstream industrial activity, including daily blasting with dynamite during construction. When that discharge stops, the creek stops; when it resumes, water returns abruptly.
Kaczynski highlights that corporations receive fast approvals and tax incentives with limited review, while residents must prove damage after the fact, at their own expense, against billion-dollar companies. She has spent significant time researching this issue (ten to twenty hours per week) and has faced high costs for water testing on her property (shipping a sample costs $121, with the test around $400 per test). Her property shows elevated strontium and other indicators consistent with deep groundwater influence, changes that coincide with upstream blasting and excavation, warranting independent investigation. If left unresolved, filters and additional testing could cost over $1,000, and her backyard footprint will be converted from permeable land to a paved industrial space of nearly 1,000 acres after construction.
She explains the broader community impact: rural farmers and families cannot compete with corporate land purchases, leading to a loss of Wisconsin’s working landscapes as new projects fill in. A second data center is proposed in Beaver Dam. The city annexed land from her township, with Alliant Energy negotiating with farmers to sell collectively; once annexed by the city, rezoning proceeds to county oversight and is described as a rubber-stamp process. By the time residents learn it is a data center, it is too late to stop it. Township residents feel unrepresented—she lacks a representative at the city level, cannot legally prove damage before construction, and is left to navigate a system that she says is not prepared to protect residents.
Kaczynski asks who will save her and others, noting that retroactive bills and a missing safety net leave them vulnerable. She ends by urging transparency and action, expressing gratitude for the hearing but lamenting that her full story has not been heard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Miley Kaczynski and I live 1.6 miles downstream from the Meta Data Center in Beaver Dam. If you need to stand and stretch for a moment, do. I have never in my life needed a group of people to be more alert to what I have to say. Thank you for staying so long. I'm a lifelong Wisconsin resident.
I live on a horse farm and I am an educator. For almost fifty years, a natural creek has flowed through my property. It's 20 feet wide, up to four feet deep. It has persisted through drought, flood, seasonal change. It's part of a connected system, brown water, tributaries, watersheds, aquifers, ultimately flowing into Beaver Dam Link.
Until construction began upstream on the data center, its behavior was stable and predictable. After construction started, all of that changed here in Beaver Dam. The creek began to stop flowing entirely. Without rainfall, it would abruptly return, often cloudy and opaque like milk with enough force to cause drastic erosion and damage. This pattern repeated itself dozens of times over a single construction season to the point that it is dry half of the time.
Dust from the construction covers my yard. My grass is white, and I'm 1.6 miles away. When I drive past it, I have to pull over because the dust cloud is so thick that I can't see of the hood of my truck. That behavior is not consistent with natural variability. It is not explained by weather patterns, and it has never happened before.
So I did what residents are told to do. I called up the Department of Natural Resources. I spoke with dedicated staff, but the system is fragmented. My reports are passed between departments. Reports are lost.
And at one point, I was told the agency didn't even know if they had clear authority over what was going on. What I learned in this process is there is no single entity responsible for what happens downstream when large scale construction disrupts a water system. Different permits govern different activities locally, county level, state level, some even federal. No one is tasked at looking at the whole picture or what happens beyond the project boundary. This is not a failure of individual agency staff.
It's a policy failure. The law is on the side of the businesses and not on the residents. In my case, the creek's flow now appears correlated with industrial activity upstream in the times when that construction took place, including daily blasting with dynamite. When that discharge stops, my creek stops. When it resumes, water returns suddenly.
Right now, corporates are receiving fast approval tax incentives, limited review, while residents are left to prove the damage after the fact at our own expense against billion dollar companies. This research has become my part time job. Ten to twenty hours a week I have spent since knowing it was a data center, trying to figure out what's happening to my land. Simply sending in a water sample from my property costs a $121 just to ship the sample. The cost of the test alone is going to be another $400 every time I have it tested.
Water testing on my property shows elevated stronium, a very dangerous metal and other indicators consistent with deep groundwater influence. A change that coincides with large x scale excavation blasting upstream and warrants independent investigation. Filters on my water system to stop this, elevated metal, persistence in my water is going to be over $1,000. When construction is complete, nearly 1,000 acres of my backyard will be converted from living permeable land into a paved industrial space. Land that once actively recharge groundwater, aquifers, and watersheds.
That change reshapes an entire community. Farmers and local families cannot compete with billion dollar corporations to pay for that land. And over time, the places that defined Wisconsin, rural communities, working landscapes, they're being replaced, and then the next project arrives to fill in that spot because nobody is building a home next to a data center. People are leaving. Now there's another open spot like a second data center now being proposed in Beaver Dam.
The city annexed this land from my township. I was there at the meeting when they were talking to the farmers. Alliant Energy sent a representative in to broker the deal with all the farmers in the area. If we can find a a buyer for the whole shebang, well, you all sell at the same time. They had ten years to find a buyer.
They knew exactly what they were doing, and they knew exactly who was going to buy that land, but we did not. Once it got annexed by the city, it goes to the county for rezoning. That is a rubber stamp in the process. There is nothing we can legally do to stop it at that point. Because you have to prove it is damage damaging to people's health.
And we cannot legally prove damage. Before it's built. So it goes through. So you have to stop it at the city level if you want to speak up. But the city level proposed a conversation at their meeting about a tid, not about a data center.
By the time we knew it was a data center, it was too late to do anything. And the residents of the township have to live now with the negative impacts of a data center that is on city properly property, and I'm not represented by the city. I don't have a representative to speak for me. I bought the property to have horses across from my childhood home. My parents live across the street with their horses.
I wanted to be here forever. I can't even leave. I am trapped here because nobody wants to buy my land. They don't wanna be near a data center, and they don't want a 20 foot empty ditch in the front yard. I am concerned at the the idea that there does not seem to be a working, system in place to make sure that permits are being followed.
We can issue them left and right. There's not enough staff. There is one mining permit officer in the DNR for the entire state of Wisconsin. There's a minor on that flag. We have one guy for the whole state to make sure people are doing what they're supposed to be doing in that particular area.
There's not enough, and yes I nodded when the data center guy was up here because I agree that eight forty does not do enough, and he put his foot in his own mouth. He said we want to work with communities, then do it. Why do you need a bill to do it? Do it. Be transparent.
And one thing I have not heard anyone, today share or talk up about is are these bills retroactive? Who is coming to save me? My safety net is gone. My my township cannot say no to being annexed by the city. My city doesn't represent me.
And here I sit before you. I I'm counting on you. I need you. It's too late for me. I didn't get to vote no.
I didn't get to speak up. I have two minutes at a public hearing at the city, and I am so grateful that you let us sit here so late tonight. Nobody has let me tell my whole story. Please, metaphorically, we are launching planes that are still being built, and we are forced to pilot them, and we don't know how to fly. Thank you for your time.
Thank you for being here.
reSee.it AI Summary
WOAH. Just days before Rep Ayanna Pressley’s swearing-in, her husband quit a $92k job to start a consulting firm. Net worth with assets reportedly jumped to $8M. Every time you see a politician with a 'consulting firm' it’s taxpayer money laundering.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
WOAH 🚨 JUST DAYS before Democrat Rep Ayanna Pressley was sworn into Congress, her husband quit a $92,000 a year job TO START A CONSULTING FIRM Net worth with assets skyrocketed to $8 million Every time you see a politician with a ‘consulting firm’ its taxpayer money laundering https://t.co/GeAQ4DeniI
Video Transcript AI Summary
Fox News reports allege wealth increases among prominent progressive lawmakers. The segment claims Ilhan Omar is worth up to $30,000,000, noting she rose from negative net worth when first elected to Congress to substantial wealth, with a husband who is a consultant.
The piece centers on Ayanna Pressley, stating that when she was elected in 2018 she had a negative net worth, but today she is worth $1,300,000 with assets up to $8,000,000. It highlights property holdings in 2024: a Martha’s Vineyard rental worth up to $5,000,000 and multiple Boston rentals worth up to $1,000,000 each, contrasting with 2019 when she reportedly owned only one property in Boston. The report also notes that days before Pressley was sworn in, her husband left a $92,000-a-year Boston City Hall job to launch Conan Harris and Associates, a consulting firm. It states his income reportedly jumped while in Washington, with a client list including government organizations and one with deep ties to the Obama Foundation. The segment describes ethics concerns about using his city-issued email to pitch Walsh’s Chief of Staff on staying on as a consultant, while city officials say they did not solicit nor accept the offer and that ethics laws bar municipal employees from using official resources for personal gain.
Pressed for comment, Pressley did not respond to Fox Business requests. Fox Business anchor David Asman appears to align with the report’s framing, acknowledging that wealth accumulation through government contacts is common but asserting questions arise about those who position themselves as anti-capitalist.
David Asman contrasts the situation with what he describes as anti-capitalist squad members who denounce capitalism yet accumulate wealth, asserting that Pressley and her fellow squad members “condemn capitalism” while “she’s the one who’s been pillaging the government,” and noting her husband’s consulting income. The discussion broadens to Ilhan Omar, claimed to be worth up to $30,000,000, with a husband who is also a consultant and previously connected to progressive circles with alleged anti-capitalist leanings.
The segment references Nancy Pelosi as part of a broader pattern, describing her as “the grand dam of all this,” and asserts she is worth about $275,000,000, with husband Paul Pelosi, suggesting insider information influenced certain trades tied to credit card companies. The speakers argue that such patterns illustrate long-standing issues, vowing continued investigation and pressure to stop perceived abuses.
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 close with remarks that this situation requires ongoing scrutiny, and they thank David Asman for the discussion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a Fox News alert. It looks like Ilhan Omar isn't the only millionaire squad member. Our team dug into open secrets and financial disclosure reports. What we found is that when Ayanna Pressley was elected to Congress back in 2018, she had a negative net worth. You fast forward to today, she's worth $1,300,000 with assets worth up to 8,000,000.
Now that's a massive increase in just six years, especially for someone on a $174,000 congressional salary. It's impressive, really. But how did she do it? Well, part of its property in 2024, Presley reported owning a Martha's Vineyard rental worth up to $5,000,000 as well as multiple Boston rentals worth up to $1,000,000 each. Now for context, back in 2019, she only reported owning one property in Boston.
We're also learning days before Presley was sworn into Congress, her husband quit his $92,000 annual Boston City Hall job to start his own consulting firm called Conan Harris and Associates. And as we read more of the congresswoman's financial disclosure reports, we learned that her husband also saw his income jump while he was in Washington. His client list consists of some government organizations, including one with deep ties to the Obama Foundation. But as he started his firm and seek new clients, he faced ethics concerns because of Presley's job in Congress. As Harris's days dwindled in the city's Office of Public Safety, he used his city issued email account to pitch Walsh's Chief of Staff on staying on as a consultant.
City officials say they did not solicit nor accept the offer, and state ethics laws bar municipal employees from knowingly using official resources for personal gain. Now we asked Presley for comment, and we even invited her on. She did not answer, but Fox Business anchor David Asman joins me now. He's been looking over this information, and David, there's nothing wrong with, you know, gaining financial resources. We see this a lot in congress, but there are questions.
Speaker 1: Well, you go back to the 1930s, the last when movies began, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. I mean, it's happened for a long time. It happens in both the right and left, but what's so rich is that this is coming from anti capitalist squad members. Know?
Yes. People who spent their life denigrating our capitalist system and saying how bad it was. In fact, congresswoman Presley came out with an ex post just a year ago. She and her fellow squad members, of course, constantly condemn capitalism, but she says Donald Trump and Musk want big banks and bad actors to run rampant and take people for a ride. They want to pillage the government and make themselves rich.
Well, she's the one who's been pillaging the government. Now again, we're not suggesting she's going in and stealing funds or anything like that, but the fact is she got rich off of her contacts in government. Her husband got rich consulting with members of the business community and others, perhaps some people who were taking grants. That's, by the way, we saw that with Lee Zeldin, the EPA Commissioner. When he came in, he found out that right before Biden left office in December 2024, he was spending billions of dollars.
A lot of that money was going directly to friends, you know, to acquaintances within the Democratic community that learned how to go in and write grants that would get accepted, making millions and millions of dollars each one of them. So, this has been going on for a while. I should mention that Presley's kind of a poor gal next to her friend Ilhan Omar. Yes. Because Ilhan Omar is worth up to $30,000,000 right now because, and she went from basically a flat to negative, if not negative point when she came into Congress.
She also has a husband who's a consultant. He was working with progressive leftists who, again, have this anti capitalist creed which they live and die by, but apparently, they, it's very easy to condemn capitalism when you're making millions of dollars, And of course, we have to mention the grand dam of all this, which is Ms. Pelosi.
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 1: Who's worth about $275,000,000 at least $275,000,000 with her husband Paul, who, and, you know, he's a good investor, but she's come to him, I'm sure, with excellent inside information that we're not allowed to trade on, but members of Congress still do, and there are certain trades that she and her husband made that clearly were based on information she was getting about credit card companies that were going to have a particular advantage that other companies didn't have. A lot of So this has got to stop. We've tried to stop it time and time again. Again, going back decades and decades, it never seems to work properly. Schweizer has done his best to try to try to come out with revealing stuff, but we're going to continue investigating and put pressure on the politicians to stop this once and for all.
Speaker 0: David Asman, thank you. Lots of questions here.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m hearing new changes are coming to how Palantir will track Americans’ financial information. This AI-driven tool will score every taxpayer and generate ranked targets for audits, collections, or criminal investigations. There’s a lot more coming. This is horrifying.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
New changes are coming to how Palantir is going to start tracking Americans' financial information This new AI-driven tool will score every American taxpayer and generates ranked lists of targets for audits, collections, or criminal investigations But there’s a lot more coming too The is actually horrifying
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses recent changes in how Palantir is used to track Americans’ financial information and the potential impact on privacy, in the context of a legislative vote scheduled for the week of April 13.
Key points:
- Palantir’s Foundry platform, described as Palantir’s civilian platform, has been inside the IRS since 2017. It connects databases containing bank statements, IRS filings, and financial transactions to identify patterns for investigations. It has helped investigators by finding patterns they might miss.
- The IRS has paid Palantir more than $200 million for this work. Historically, the use of Foundry was limited to cases that were already open, with investigators having a formal reason to look and an active investigation.
- In December 2024, the IRS paid Palantir $1.8 million to build a tool called SNAP, standing for the selection and analytic platform. SNAP is described as taking the human out of the equation, scoring every American taxpayer and generating a ranked list of who the government should target next for audits, collections, and criminal investigations.
- In the following months, the IRS paid Palantir an additional $2.25 million to expand SNAP. SNAP reportedly will pull transaction data from platforms like Venmo, Etsy, Depop, and Cash App. The threshold for reporting on these platforms reportedly dropped to $600 this year, expanding the scope of potentially flagged activities (including small-scale transactions such as selling a used couch or freelance dog walking).
- There is concern about legality. In June 2025, ten members of Congress wrote to Palantir’s CEO suggesting the program likely violates the Privacy Act of 1974 and federal tax privacy laws, which limit tax information use to tax-related purposes. The IRS’s top lawyer reportedly agreed but was removed from the position two days after making that statement.
- Two short-term actions are proposed:
1) Remove oneself from data broker databases to shrink the government’s data footprint, since it can access real-time location data, phone numbers, and spending habits through third-party data brokers without warrants. California residents can use privacy.california.gov/drop to send deletion requests to over 500 data brokers; the service is described as quick (about five minutes). Non-Californians can use services like Incogni or DeleteMe, with caveats about due diligence and potential fees.
2) Contact Rick Crawford, chair of the House Intelligence Committee, to push for warrant protections in FISA reauthorization. The vote is scheduled for the week of April 13. Crawford’s DC office number is (202) 225-4076, and the speaker demonstrates making a call to advocate for warrant requirements.
The speaker emphasizes that if the legislation passes without protections, broader discussions about compliance and oversight will be necessary, and encourages viewers to begin by removing data footprints and calling Crawford.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There has been some really recent changes as to how Palantir is going to start tracking Americans' financial information. And I don't wanna scare anybody, but I do think that this is really important to talk about, especially right now because there's legislation that is being voted on next week on April 13, and we need to make sure that it doesn't pass without there being some protections in there for all of us. So what a lot of people I don't think realize is that Palantir's Foundry platform, which is their civilian platform, has been inside the IRS since 2017. And what it's done is connected all of these databases that contain your bank statements, your our IRS filings, your financial transactions, all of that stuff, and it would find patterns across it for investigate. If someone was suspected of, let's say, fraud, then Foundry could pull that someone's financial information and run an analysis over it and find patterns that maybe a human analyst might miss.
And over the years, the IRS has paid Palantir more than $200,000,000 for that level of work. But there was always a caveat in that system, and that was the scope because that system was only to be used on cases that were already open, meaning that an investigator already had to suspect something was up, there had to be a formal filed investigation, and they had to have this reason to look. And then Foundry would then help them look faster. But something has changed recently that we need to talk about because in December 2024, the IRS had paid Palantir $1,800,000 to build a tool called SNAP, which stands for the selection and analytic platform. And, yes, that is SNAP, the same acronym as the food benefit program.
So make of that what you will. What's dangerous about SNAP is that it takes the human out of the equation. So SNAP doesn't wait for an investigator to open a case on you or have a reason to look at you. The algorithm scores every American taxpayer and generates this ranked list of who the government should target next. And this is for audits, collections, for criminal investigations.
I mean, truly, it is endless what they could flag you. And the reason I say recently is because even though this has been in development since December 2024, the IRS just last month paid Palantir another $2,250,000 to expand Snap further. And Snap doesn't just read your tax return either. According to this expansion, it's going to be able to pull transaction data from places like Venmo, Etsy, Depop, and Cash App. And this year, according to reports, the threshold for reporting on those platforms has dropped to $600.
$600. So that's anyone who's selling a used couch on Facebook marketplace to a freelancer who walks dogs on the weekend. By the way, I got rid of Venmo, like, two years ago because I don't trust the PayPal mafia of it all. Like, knowing that Peter Thiel co founded PayPal and Palantir is a big enough red flag for them not to handle any of my transaction history. And that's gonna be a big one, so I recommend getting rid of that if I were you.
Personally, I use Apple Pay because it's a little bit safer in that Apple doesn't keep a social feed of your transactions and has never given the government direct server access to those transactions. I mean, it's still subject to IRS reporting rules for businesses, but it's a lot cleaner than those other options. Is this even legal? Well, it's complicated, really, because in June 2025, 10 members of Congress did write to Palantir CEO and say that this likely violates the privacy act of 1974 and federal tax privacy laws, which says that your tax information cannot be used for anything unrelated to taxes, that it is a federal crime. And the IRS's top lawyer did agree with that, but he was swiftly removed from his position two days after saying that on the record in 2025.
Now there are two things you can do about this right now, both of which are short term fixes, but it'll at least give you something to do so you're not just a puddle of anxiety. The first thing is going to be to remove yourself from all data broker databases. Because like I said, the government is not just using IRS data. They are going to be using your real time location data, your phone number, and any spending habits that they find through social media or any third party data broker that they can buy it from. Because buying that information does not require a warrant, and that is how they get around the court system.
So you can shrink that footprint. I can only speak to California because that's where I live, so each state is gonna have its own rules on how to do this. But if you live in California, then you can go to privacy.california.gov/drop. And I'll insert a video here of what you're supposed to do while you're there. Basically, it's a free website that's run by the state.
It's one form. It sends deletion request to over 500 data brokers and databases across The US at once, and it takes all of five minutes. It's definitely worth it. I just did it this morning. If you're not in California, you could look at services like Incogni or DeleteMe.
Full disclosure, I'm not sponsored by them. I've never worked with them. I've never used their platform. So do your due diligence. But from what I understand, it's the same thing with a small fee attached.
Now the next thing you can do is call Rick Crawford this week. Now I'm not kidding around. This is the most important thing every single one of you should be doing. Okay? Crawford is the House Intelligence Committee chair, and he controls whether FISA reauthorization goes to vote with or without any warrant protections.
The vote is scheduled for the week of April 13. That is next week. That is a few days away. So everybody needs to call him right now or tomorrow. K?
His DC office number is (202) 225-4076. You don't have to be from Arkansas. Any American can call him. In fact, I'm gonna call him right now and show you how to do it. Okay?
Because I know it can be scary sometimes. I'm gonna have to put you guys on my computer screen. One sec.
Speaker 1: Thank you for calling the office of congressman Rick Crawford. I'm sorry we could not answer your call. If you'd like to leave an opinion for the congressman, please give us your name, the county you are calling from, and a brief message. If you are in need of assistance, please give us your name, an email address, or a phone number, and a brief message detailing the issue you need help with, and we will get back to you as soon as possible. Thank you, and have a wonderful day.
Speaker 0: Hi. My name is Audrey Henson, and I'm calling to request that chairman Crawford add warrant requirements to the FISA authorization before it goes to the floor. I just don't think that the fourth amendment should have loopholes like this in it, and the government should not be able to buy data from third parties. So please be on the right side of history with this. This is going to affect you and your family too.
Thank you. I'm not good at that. Now, if legislation doesn't pass with protections, if the government thinks that they can keep building a system with no oversight and no public vote, then we need to have a much bigger conversation about what compliance means when the system that you're complying with is being used against you, if you're picking up what I'm putting down. But that is a bigger conversation with pretty big consequences, and nobody should be having that conversation alone. So the first step is to do just what I did, and and call his office and try to delete your data, and we'll start there.
And we'll see what next week brings.
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim Muslims are practicing Sharia in Plano, Texas. A Muslim at East Plano Islamic Center is with his underage wife, and the investigator says he has three more underage wives at home, insisting, “It’s already happening right here in Plano.”
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
American says Muslims are already practicing Sharia Law in Plano, Texas A Muslim is seen at the East Plano Islamic Center with his very underage wife Investigator says he has 3 more underage wives at home “She is his wife. Yes, his wife. Please spare me your denials of Sharia law could never happen in America because it's already happening right here in Plano. And this is all over. He's got three more little wives at home too, by the way.”
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Ayaan Hirsi Ali warns of a planned Islamic takeover in the U.S., citing Dawah manuals and mosques funded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar to promote a hostile belief system. She says Muslims infiltrate government, media, education, and family; establishing student associations to islamize institutions, with the same strategy for government and media. She argues discussing political Islam is taboo and Islamophobia invented, equating dissent with bigotry.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Member of the House of Representatives of the Netherlands, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, warns America of the planned Islamic takeover She says there are actual manuals that were created by Muslim leaders to take over the United States, and they’re being followed “The establishment of mosques of Islamic centers that are paid for by governments like Saudi Arabia and Qatar to promote, assist a belief system that is hostile and that is designed to replace the existing our American system. — It is gradual. It is a match through the systems, through government, through the media, through education, through the family. And I'm not making these things up. — You can access all this information. You can get these Dawah manuals and just read for yourself how they set out their strategies, get into campuses, establish Muslim student associations. The Muslim student associations, they're given tools and tactics and to islamize that particular institution. And it's the same for government, the same for media. And it's working. It's working because right now you cannot discuss political Islam. It's been made a taboo, a time Islamophobia has been invented. That makes you, especially — a white man, it, it uses your own vulnerabilities against you because the minute you start to question their goals, their objectives, you're not having a conversation about those particular facts. We are going to have a conversation about you are bigotry”
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that California election fraud is exposed in Riverside county’s Prop 50 redistricting: nearly 50,000 votes created. Handwritten logs show 611,428 ballots received; certified total to the SOS was 657,322. About 45,896 votes (~7%) added without explanation. Sheriff seized over 650,000 ballots for a hand count. AG Bonta calls warrants unprecedented and legally deficient. Democrats are rigging our elections.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
California Election Fraud has been officially exposed. A ballot discrepancy was found in Riverside county for the Prop 50 redistricting Nearly 50,000 votes in just one county seem to have been created out of thin air - Handwritten logs from the Registrar of Voters show 611,428 ballots received - The official certified total reported to the Secretary of State was 657,322 votes - 45,896 votes roughly 7% of the county total were allegedly added without any explanation Sheriff Chad Bianco launched a criminal investigation and obtained court-issued search warrants and seized over 650,000 ballots from the Registrar’s office to conduct his own hand count Democrat California Attorney General Rob Bonta calls this move “unprecedented” and “legally deficient,” arguing the warrants lacked probable cause of a specific crime Democrats are rigging our elections
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ramin begins by noting that California said 657,000 people voted in Riverside County on Prop 50, but the registrar’s handwritten logs show 611,000 ballots came through the door—a gap of 45,896 ballots. He adds that a sheriff, sworn in with a badge and a court-issued warrant, says he’ll count those ballots himself, and the California attorney general “loses his mind” over the idea of stopping someone from counting paper.
Speaker 1 clarifies the numbers: the registrar of voters’ logs show 611,428 ballots cast, while 657,322 votes were reported and certified to the secretary of state, a difference of 45,896 votes.
Ramin uses a simple analogy to illustrate the discrepancy: if you squeeze 20 lemons and sell cups all afternoon, but someone later claims 28 cups were sold, eight cups exceed the supply. He says this is the gist of Riverside’s situation: 611,000 ballots entered, 657,000 votes certified, and a 45,896-vote gap, which he calls unacceptable.
He emphasizes that this is not a local school board vote, but Gavin Newsom’s Prop 50, officially called the Election Rigging Response Act. Prop 50 gave Sacramento the power to overturn California’s independent redistricting commission and redraw all 52 congressional districts to benefit Democrats, with maps crafted by Democratic operatives and in effect through 2030. It passed statewide 64% to 36, with over 8,000,000 votes cast.
Ramin notes that while the phantom Riverside votes did not flip the statewide result, the point is about potential partisan impact: Republicans currently hold the House by six seats, and California’s new maps are designed to flip five of those seats. He mentions representatives Kevin Kiley and Darrell Issa as examples of Republicans in districts that were redrawn to become more favorable to Democrats. If Democrats flip those seats in November 2026, they would take back the House.
Buried within the election that made all of this possible is the 45,000-vote gap in a single county. He extrapolates: if Riverside County’s 7% turnout were representative of all 8,000,000 statewide votes, that could imply over 500,000 “ghost votes.” He explicitly says he is not asserting that this happened and that nobody knows, because no… (the excerpt ends abruptly).
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So California just told you that 657,000 people voted in Riverside County on prop 50. But the guy whose actual job it was to count those ballots, register our voters, his own handwritten logs say 611,000 ballots came through the door. That's a difference of 45,896 votes just gone or maybe just appeared. Nobody knows. Now here's where it gets good.
A sheriff, an actual sheriff with a badge and a gun and a court issued warrant signed by a judge says, I'm gonna go count those ballots myself. And the California attorney general loses his mind. Why would you try to stop someone from counting paper? I'm Ramin. Let's dig in.
Speaker 1: This investigation is very simple. The registrar of voters maintained handwritten logs of the total number of ballots coming into the ROV. An audit of those logs received from the Riverside County registrar of voters allegedly shows six eleven thousand four hundred and twenty eight ballots were cast, but six fifty seven thousand three twenty two votes were reported and certified to the secretary of state. That is a difference of forty five thousand eight ninety six votes.
Speaker 0: So let me break this down like you're seven years old running a lemonade stand. Your mom gives you 20 lemons. You squeeze every single one. You sell cups all afternoon. At the end of the day, someone tells you you sold 28 cups of lemonade, but you only had 20 lemons.
Where the other eight cups come from? And that's it. That's the whole story. That's what's happening in Riverside County right now. 611,000 ballots walked through the door.
657,000 votes got certified in Sacramento. And the people responsible for that 45,000 gap are saying, hey, trust us. It's fine. It's with unacceptable errors. Acceptable errors in an election for a ballot measure that redrew California's entire congressional map.
I want you to remember that phrase, acceptable error. We're gonna come back to it in a second. Now let me give you the actual number. 45,896 votes. That's not a rounding error.
That's not acceptable error. That's the population of a small city. That's a stadium full of people showing up without ballots. Because here's what people are missing. This wasn't some local school board vote.
This was Gavin Newsom's baby. Prop 50 officially called the election rigging response act. This gave Sacramento the power to throw out California's independent redistricting commission and redraw all 52 congressional districts to benefit Democrats. Maps redrawn by Democratic operatives operatives in effect through 2030. It passed statewide 64% to 36%.
Over 8,000,000 votes cast. So, yeah, the phantom votes at Riverside didn't flip the statewide result, but that's not the point. The point is this, Republicans currently hold the house by six seats. Six. California's new maps are designed to flip five of those seats.
Reps like Kevin Kiley, Darrell Issa, guys in redrawn districts that just got a lot bluer overnight. Now if Democrats flip those seats in November 2026, they take back the house. And buried inside the election that made all of that possible, 45,000 votes that nobody can explain in one county. Now extrapolate. If Riverside County is 7% fan of vote rate existed across all 8,000,000 statewide votes, that's over 500,000 ghost votes, half a million.
I'm not saying that happened. Nobody knows. Because no
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m told Humboldt County uses grainy satellite images to identify unpermitted structures and then bills homeowners up to $12,000 a day, with liens as high as $900,000, risking tax sales. The county claims environmental protection, but residents say the Environmental Response Team targets cannabis sites to push people into legality and meet quotas. How is this different from mob rule?
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
California Democrats are using satellite images to find structures on residents properties, like a shed that wasn’t authorized to be built, and then sending them bills for as much as $12,000 per day One family received a notice the would have a $900,000 lien out on their home from the county How is one California county using cannabis and grainy satellite images to extort millions from homeowners? This is Doug and Kareen Thomas — They moved to Humboldt County after their home burned down in the L.A County wildfires, and 6 days later, their dream property turned into a nightmare. The county said a letter saying this barn was built without a permit, and prior owners did use it for growing weed. So they had 10 days to demo the barn or face fines of $12,000 per day. And ignoring the letter would result in a $900,000 lien placed on their property, which could then be sold at a tax sale. — How is this possible? Well, Humboldt County is part of the Emerald Triangle. For decades, it's been a hotspot for OG growers. And after California went legal, the county wanted its cut. So they created an environmental response team to supposedly protect a sensitive ecosystem. In reality, it was used to weed out black market growers and incentivize them into the legal industry. They'd use old grainy satellite images to look for unpermitted development, like barns, greenhouses, grading, and even the removal of too many trees, because those things must mean you're growing weed. However, in Humboldt, people have developed property and lived off the land without permits for generations. But the county didn't care. They had a quota to me, 50 permit violations a week. — How are Humboldt County's actions any different than mob rule?”
reSee.it AI Summary
I observe private equity firms buying classic American chains like Carl’s Jr., Sonic, Arby’s, Buffalo Wild Wings, Jimmy John’s, Baskin-Robbins, Dunkin’, Auntie Anne’s, Subway, and more. They consolidate to cut labor, install their own operators, extract fees, and maximize profits, supposedly driving down quality while raising prices. They claim this is only the tip of the iceberg.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Private equity firms are buying classic American food restaurants and destroying the quality and raising prices Popular places now owned by private equity firms Carl’s Jr. Sonic Arby’s Buffalo Wild Wings Jimmy John’s Baskin-Robbins Dunkin’ Auntie Anne’s Moe’s Southwest Grill Jamba Carvel Schlotzsky’s McAlister’s Deli Cinnabon Hardee’s Miller’s Ale House Jim ’N Nick’s Community Bar-B-Q Subway “They've all been bought out by private equity firms. If you've noticed, the quality at food chains keeps getting worse while the prices increase. This is why — Private equity has been busy consolidating restaurants to cut labor, install their own operators, extract fees, and maximize profits” “This is only the tip of the iceberg”
reSee.it AI Summary
There were 10 seconds cut from Mark Cook’s testimony before the Georgia House; the recovered audio claims, “Democrats are rigging our elections with electronic voting machines.”
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
RECOVERED 🚨 There was 10 seconds that were cut from Election Expert Mark Cook’s witness testimony in front of the Georgia House of Representatives Very conveniently they cut out 10 seconds right in the middle of his sentence But the original audio has been recovered: Democrats are rigging our elections with electronic voting machines
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Cook, an election cybersecurity subject matter expert in threat assessment and common sense mitigation, introduces himself: he’s been working on elections nonstop for about six years and has forty years of IT industry experience. He states that he has evidence he hopes to show that there are backdoors built into electronic voting systems that allow flipping, changing of votes.
He references a demonstration clip, saying, “backdoors built in to electronic voting systems that allow flipping, changing of votes,” and notes that the testing labs miss this, leaving the systems blindly certified and supposedly safe. He highlights audio he believes was clipped from a recording, insisting that the content shows voting systems are vulnerable: “that allow flipping, changing of votes,” and that testing labs are blind to these issues. He says, “I can demonstrate this to you even while I'm still here in this building.”
Cook argues that there is a lack of government transparency, claiming, “the testing labs all miss this, then they're blindly certified, and then we're told, it's shut down our throats, that everything is safe and secure.” He describes the entire system as “built on a pyramid of lies,” and asserts that it must be stopped. He offers to educate and show problems, insisting he can do so, but emphasizes the need for a common-sense approach.
He emphasizes practicality and accessibility, arguing that the problem can be solved with straightforward methods: “We're literally filling dots out on paper. We're counting the dots, adding the dots up, and whoever has the most dots wins.” He calls for a change that keeps elections under the control of the people and avoids simply “kicking the can down the road.” He reiterates that the resolution is not complicated and frames the solution as a simple, transparent counting method using paper records rather than electronic manipulation.
In summary, Cook asserts the existence of covert backdoors in electronic voting systems, criticizes testing labs for blindly certifying these systems, condemns what he calls a “pyramid of lies,” and advocates a return to a basic, paper-driven, dot-counting approach where the person with the most dots wins, to restore public control over elections. He offers to provide demonstrations and education to support this view.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You. I appreciate it. My name is Mark Cook. I'm an election cybersecurity subject matter expert in threat assessment and common sense mitigation. I've been working on elections solid nonstop for about six years now.
Thank you. I have been working in the IT industry for forty years. I have intrinsic knowledge that would be really important for people to understand. I have evidence right here that I was hoping to show you that can show there are absolutely I know you guys have heard this, but I've got the proof right here. Backdoors built in to electronic voting systems that allow flipping, changing of votes.
So the testing labs What? Wow. Did you see that? I can't believe they did that. Did you hear that?
Yep. Watch it again and pay attention to the time in the upper right corner. That allow flipping, changing of votes. So the testing labs Can you believe that? Yes.
So much for government transparency, I guess. Well, how about we just put that audio right back where they clipped it out so everyone can hear it. Enjoy. That allow flipping, changing of votes Infiltrating the system, all built in, set up in a way that makes it easy and untraceable. I can demonstrate this to you even while I'm still here in this building.
I'm happy to do so. The testing labs all miss this, then they're blindly certified, and then we're told, it's shut down our throats, that everything is safe and secure. It's absolutely not. We're being lied to from the very top. The whole thing is built on a pyramid of lies, and we have to stop living these lies.
I will educate you. I can show you guys the problems. No issue. I'm happy to do so. But we have to approach this in a common sense form here.
We have to be smart about what we're doing. If we're gonna make a change, we need make a change that's actually gonna solve the problem and not kick the can down the road and, again, take the control of elections away from where elections belong, which is in the people's hands. Yep. And this is not complicated to solve. We're literally filling dots out on paper.
We're counting the dots, adding the dots up, and whoever has the most dots wins. That
reSee.it AI Summary
I heard an audio clip claiming Fauci discussed making vaccination hard to obtain so people drop their beliefs. He supposedly said schools and colleges will require vaccines, and big employers like Amazon and Facebook will demand them to hire. He claimed once people feel empowered and legally protected, they’ll lose their ideological resistance and get vaccinated.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Uncovered audio shows Anthony Fauci talking about having every major corporation require vaccinations and making it as hard as possible on citizens so they’re forced to be vaccinated He says if you make it hard enough on people, they’ll abandon their beliefs This is Evil “Once people feel empowered and protected legally, you are gonna have schools, universities and colleges are gonna say, you wanna come to this college buddy? You're gonna get vaccinated, lady. You're gonna get vaccinated. Big corporations like Amazon and Facebook and all of those others are gonna say, you wanna work for us to get vaccinate. And it's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit. And they get vaccinated.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the exchange, Speaker 1 advocates that a solution to vaccination uptake may require some form of mandatory vaccination, noting that federal officials resist that term. Speaker 2 adds that once people feel legally empowered, educational institutions will require vaccination, with colleges, universities, and employers like Amazon and Facebook signaling that anyone wanting to study or work there must be vaccinated. He asserts that making life difficult for people will cause them to drop ideological objections and get vaccinated.
Speaker 0 challenges whether all objections to COVID vaccinations are “ideological bullshit,” insisting that is not what was being referred to and arguing that the claim about making it hard for people to live was made in a broader context about education, travel, work, and overall life, and that she takes offense at the interpretation.
Speaker 0 then references Miss Allison Williams, who testified before the committee about losing her job after seeking an exemption from ESPN’s vaccine mandate. Williams’ case involved recommendations from bureaucrats and a fertility expert, highlighting that she and her husband, who were pursuing pregnancy with medical guidance, should not have been forced to vaccinate. Speaker 0 contends she was fired because “you made it hard” as described in the statement, preventing her from working, living, and making health decisions with her healthcare professional, thereby impacting American society’s ability to flourish and self-determine certain rights—stating that America should take offense at this.
The dialogue shifts to Doctor Fauci. The speaker addresses him directly, calling him “doctor of fear” and stating that Americans do not hate science but hate having their freedoms taken. The speaker accuses Fauci of inspiring and creating fear through mass mandates, school closures, and vaccine mandates, claiming these policies have destroyed the American people’s trust in public health institutions and will have ripple effects for generations. It is asserted that fear has manifested in areas such as education and the economy, and the speaker concludes by separating their stance from science, saying, “I disagree with you because I disagree with fear.” The exchange ends with Speaker 0 yielding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In an interview that you gave as part of an audiobook written by Michael Spector, that you believed an institutional should make it hard for people to to live their lives. It so they'd feel pressured to get vaccinated. Could we re re, run the audio clip on that, please?
Speaker 1: Do you think can be done about it? I have to say that I don't see a big solution other than some sort of mandatory vaccination. I know federal officials don't like
Speaker 2: to use that term. Once people feel empowered and protected legally, you are gonna have schools, universities, and colleges are gonna say, you wanna come to this college, buddy? You're gonna get vaccinated. Lady, you're gonna get vaccinated. Yeah.
Big corporations like Amazon and Facebook and and and all of those others are gonna say, you wanna work for us? You get vaccinated. And it's been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit, and they get vaccinated.
Speaker 0: Thank you. Are all objections to COVID vaccinations ideological bullshit, doctor Pauci? No. They're not. And that's
Speaker 2: not what I was referring
Speaker 0: to. Well, in reference to making it hard for people to get education, traveling, working, I'd say it very much was in context. And I take great offense to this. Miss Allison Williams testified before this committee about losing her job because she sought an exemption for ESPN's vaccine mandate, came from recommendation from bureaucrats like yourself. She and her husband were actively working with a fertility expert, a physician on how to get pregnant and agreed with the premise that she was young, healthy, wanted to get pregnant, and shouldn't get the vaccination for medical purposes.
But she was fired because you made it hard just like you said in your statement because you didn't wanna make sure that the ideological bullshit got in the way of her working, of living her life, of making a medical decision with her health care professional. I think America should take great offense to this. That's exactly what you meant when you said making it hard for people to live without getting a vaccination. You affected people's ability to work, travel, be educated, to actually flourish in American society, to self determine as well given God given rights. Shame on you.
Doctor. Fauci, you've become doctor of fear. Americans do not hate science. I don't hate science. The American people hate having their freedoms taken from them.
You inspired and created fear through mass mandates, school closures, vaccine mandates that have destroyed the American people's trust in our public health institutions. This fear you created will continue to have ripple effects over generations to come. You have already seen its effects in education, in the economy, and everything else. Quite frankly, you said, if you agree if you disagree with me, you disagree with science. Doctor Fauci, I disagree with you because I disagree with fear.
And with that, I yield.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
This is INSANE “Redacted CIA documents from the Biden administration, they identified motherhood and homemaking as indicators of white racially and ethnically motivated violent extremism” “They don't just hate women, they hate white women specifically” https://t.co/3xW44R1Hnw
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
This is genius A video was made in the style of Disney that explains Sharia Law This makes Islam and Sharia Law easy to understand for everyone of all ages https://t.co/sVf4NqkTFR
reSee.it AI Summary
I grew up Muslim and studied the Qur'an for years. In this clip I say the audience missed what was said because it was in Arabic. It quotes Surah 9:5, “the sword,” often called the verse of the sword, about fighting until submission and paying jizya. I question symbolism, context, and how religious texts are used in modern politics, asking if people would stay silent for another faith.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Woman who grew up as a Muslim exposes we all missed what was said at the mosque Zohran Mamdani gave his speech at when he got elected mayor of New York City She says we all missed it because it was in Arabic They called to kill all the infidels (us) “Listen very carefully to the verse that is being recited here: (She shows the footage, it really happened) ‘Oh, the killing of the infidels by the sword’ For context, I grew up Muslim. I studied the Qur'an in Islam for years. I wore hijab, my head, and the verse that you just heard is from the Qur'an. It's Surah nine verse five, and it's often referred to by many scholars as the verse of the sword. I mean, this guy kind of has no shame. — This verse speaks about fighting opposing groups until they submit to a political authority and pay a tax that's called the jizya, and the jizya is meant to subdue and humiliate them. All of this, of course, raises a much larger question about symbolism context and how historical religious texts are viewed in modern political spaces. Let's just be honest for a second. If any other religion recited wartime scripture while a politician was present, would people stay silent about it?“
reSee.it AI Summary
I note claims that lab-grown chocolate hits shelves in 2027, with Oreo, Cadbury, and Toblerone funding Israeli biotech because labs are cheaper than farms. I’m told Cadbury Dairy Milk uses vegetable fats alongside cocoa butter in many markets, with standards allowing up to 5% non-cocoa fats; U.S. rules are laxer for milk chocolate. The post also mentions an exposer flagging cadmium trace levels and ultra-processing warnings.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
I verified this and it’s true “Lab-grown chocolate is coming to shelves in 2027. Oreo, Cadbury and Toblerone are already funding the Israeli biotech producing it because a lab is cheaper than a farm” “Cadbury has been quietly replacing your chocolate — This dairy milk isn't legal chocolate in 27 countries, the cocoa butter was replaced with vegetable fat, a cheap blend of 6 industrial oils. What remains is diluted with polyglycerol — Soon even that gets replaced, you'll be eating cells grown in a pharmaceutical tank” Cadbury Dairy Milk (in the UK and many markets) has included vegetable fats (like palm and shea) alongside cocoa butter for years. UK/EU regulations allow up to 5% non-cocoa vegetable fats in chocolate if it meets minimum cocoa solids (20%) and other standards. In America standards are much lower - For milk chocolate specifically: Only 10% chocolate liquor, 12% milk solids, and 3.39% milk fat are required “Exposer flagged lead in cadmium traces with an ultra processing warning”
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned, via FOIA, that Democrats funded groups paying for voter registrations, with claims that in 2020 the registrations were fake and covered up. The investigation found bags of prepaid voting cards, burner phones, and iPads. GBI Strategies allegedly ran temporary facilities across states, producing thousands of fake registrations, including 10,000 in Michigan, and another 2,500 the next day, with FBI involvement. Muskegon alone had over 10,000 fake registrations; guns with silencers were also found. Democrats and the media said the election was 100% secure, yet FOIA exposed otherwise.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
WOAH 🚨 Freedom of Information Act request reveals Democrats are paying companies to provide voter registrations, and in the 2020 election THEY WERE FAKE and covered up Police investigated and found bags of prepaid voting cards, burner phones, iPads used for the operation. It was covered up - A Democrat funded organization called GBI Strategies setup temporary facilities in multiple states and produced fake voter registrations - 10,000 voter registration forms from a single individual with GBI strategies in Swing State Michigan - The same woman returned the next day with another 2,500 voter registration applications - Police investigated and found bags of prepaid voting cards, burner phones, iPads used for the operation - The case was involved a multi-state operation; the FBI took over, suspecting interstate activity - Over 10,000 fake voter registrations found just in Muskegon, Michigan - All these fake voter registrations can still be on voter rolls - According to the Michigan State Police report obtained via FOIA guns equipped with silencers were found during the investigation Democrats and the media said the election was 100% secure, yet it took a Freedom of Information Act to get this information
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that the Florida Department of Health tested 46 top candy brands, finding 28 with unsafe arsenic levels. They claim chronic exposure raises cancer risk and other neurological issues. The post lists safe annual piece limits by candy, e.g., Black Forest Gummy Bears 16, Laffy Taffy 4, Nerds 96, Sweet Tart Originals 48, Hershey’s Cookies and Cream 1.5 bars, etc.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
This is INSANE “This is how many pieces of your child's favorite candy they can consume per year before they surpass their safe level of arsenic intake:” Black Forest Gummy Bears - 16 pieces per year Laffy Taffys - 4 pieces per year Trolli Sour Gummy Worms - 12 pieces per year Hershey’s Cookies and Cream bars - 1.5 bars per year Jolly Ranchers -6 per year Kit Kats -4 per year Twizzlers Strawberry - 4 per year Twizzlers Cherry - 8 per year Nerds - 96 pieces per year (This is less than one mini box) Nerds Gummy Clusters - 24 pieces per year Sweet Tart Originals - 48 pieces per year Sweet Tart Ropes - 3 per year This is based on new Florida guidelines, not the paid off FDA ‘The Florida Department of Health recently tested 46 top candy brands and found that 28 contained unsafe levels of arsenic. Chronic exposure to high arsenic levels can cause increased cancer risk, cognitive decline, behavioral and neurological disorders, neuromotor dysfunction, and affects your nervous system.’
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim 8,000 pages show Fulton County DA Fani Willis colluding with the Justice Department, the January 6 Democrats, and the Biden White House. Biden's White House allegedly waived Trump's executive privilege; the Justice Department supposedly approved a two-week request to mobilize federal workers to aid a state case against a federal figure. The fix was in. Democrats and everyone involved should be rotting in prison. This is treason.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Lawsuit reveals 8,000 pages of documents showing Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis “colluded with the Justice Department, with the January 6th Democrats and the Biden White House” “Joe Biden's White House said, we'll waive Donald Trump's executive privilege for you” “The Justice Department said, we'll waive and approve your two-week request, which are requests to get federal workers to help you build a state case against a federal or national figure. The fix was in” Democrats and everyone involved should be rotting in prison. This is treason
Video Transcript AI Summary
Just the News reports a story based on thousands of pages of documents obtained over years with the help of America First Legal, focusing on Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her prosecution of a state case against Donald Trump that mirrored the federal case led by Jack Smith. The documents, they say, show that Willis was in deep collusion with the Justice Department, with the January 6 Democrats, and with the Biden White House. The claim is that the Biden White House said it would waive Donald Trump’s executive privilege for Willis, and the Justice Department said it would waive and approve Willis’s 2E requests to obtain federal workers to help build a case against a national figure at the state level. The report asserts the “fix was in” and that this constitutes the strongest evidence to date of coordinated action to pursue Trump across jurisdictions.
The asserted significance is that the Democrats intentionally and strategically created a double jeopardy, double drain machine to go after Trump, potentially infringing civil liberties by pursuing prosecutions in multiple venues for the same or related conduct. The narrative claims this involved the Biden White House, the Biden DOJ, and the January 6 Democrats pressing Willis to create a system where Trump could be targeted in more than one place, a scenario described as a “double jeopardy, double drain.” The report suggests this development is now focused in Miami and anticipates further disclosures.
Looking ahead, the program teases next steps: tomorrow they plan to reveal whether there was a financial incentive or “financial follow the money” stream to Willis tied to her pursuit. They note that if this pattern occurred in Georgia, there are similar election cases in Wisconsin and Arizona, raising questions about federal taxpayers funding state efforts to smear Trump and create multi-state double jeopardy scenarios. The discussion frames these elements as part of a conspiracy case beginning to unfold in Miami.
Upcoming segments are promised to include new election integrity revelations from figures like Tulsi Gabbard, Kash Patel, and Pam Bondi. These revelations are expected to concern intrusions and issues targeting the 2026 election, with the aim of informing Senate members—potentially swaying those on the fence about the Save or related measures. The program signals that these developments will be explored in upcoming appearances, including guests such as Barry Loudermilk.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You've got, some breaking news and stories you're bringing up at Justin News. Give us just give us the you're the Pathfinder. Tell us what's dropping and what's about to drop.
Speaker 1: What we have just a few minutes ago and put up on Justin News is a story, that we got thousands of pages of documents we had to sue for multiple years with the help of America First Legal to get Fonny Willis to finally cough up. What did they show? They show that Fonny Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney who brought the first state case against Donald Trump that mirrored or mimicked the Jack Smith case against President Trump, was in deep collusion with the Justice Department, with, the January 6 Democrats and the Biden White House. Yep. Joe Biden's White House said, we'll waive Donald Trump's executive privilege for you.
The Justice Department said, we'll waive and approve your 2E request, which are requests to, get federal workers to help you build a, state case against a federal or national figure. The fix was in. And why is this important? Because this is the best proof we've had to date. These documents, 8,000 pages, everybody should go read them.
They're up at Just the News. They show that the Democrats intentionally and strategically created a double jeopardy, double drain machine to go after Donald Trump, potentially another violation of the civil liberties of Donald Trump and his followers who were prosecuted and pursued after the twenty twenty election. We have double jeopardy. We're protected from being prosecuted for the same crimes in two places, except in this case you see the Biden Justice Department, the Biden White House, and the January 6 Democrats trying to push Fonny Willis to create a double jeopardy, double drain situation for Donald Trump. That's not what we do in America.
If you're a patriot, if you're a patriot, you might do that. This is day one. Tomorrow, we're going to show people whether there was a financial incentive, financial reward, a financial follow the money stream to Fonny Willis that comes in as she's pursuing this. And you can assume that if it happened in Georgia, well, we have similar election cases now in Wisconsin and Arizona. The next question will be for the Justice Department, for the FBI, for the congressional investigators like Barry Loudermilk, who's coming on my show tonight.
Did it happen in those states? Was this so orchestrated that federal taxpayers were funding the state, efforts to smear Donald Trump to create double jeopardy, double drain situations in multiple states. It will become part of the conspiracy case. It is now working out of Miami. That's what's happening.
Next week, I think we'll get our first taste of some of the new election integrity revelations that people like Tulsi Gabbard and Kash Patel and Pam Bondi have been working on. We'll learn of some new intrusions and some things that should concern us and that we can fix with the twenty twenty six election. I think it's the sort of stuff that will wise up some senators who might be on the fence on They the Save might get a little smarter when they hear these next revelations, probably next week.
reSee.it AI Summary
I spent my career at the CIA and NSA. I looked into why Charlie Kirk might have ordered an audit into Turning Point USA just before he was assassinated. Three consulting firms were funded by TPUSA, all owned by a single TPUSA Director.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
This woman worked her entire career at the CIA and NSA She says she looked into why Charlie Kirk might have ordered an audit into Turning Point USA right before he was assassinated 3 consulting firms were being funneled money from TPUSA, all 3 were owned by 1 Director at TPUSA https://t.co/EviP7z9Q6m
reSee.it AI Summary
There’s an epidemic of sexual abuse in the state. Our firm alone has identified over 360 perpetrator teachers in California—just in California? Correct, and we know there are many more; we certainly don’t have all the cases.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
🚨 Just one law firm has identified 360 teachers that are sexual predators in California “There is an epidemic of sexual abuse in the state — Our firm alone has discovered over 360 perpetrator teachers” “Just in California?” “Correct, and we believe there's many, many more. We know there's many more. 'cause we certainly don't have all of the cases.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker identifies the main issue in the California public school system (K-12) as an epidemic of sexual abuse by teachers, coaches, and other school employees. The speaker notes that it wasn’t until 2012 that a victim could file a civil lawsuit for damages in California. Since then, the speaker’s firm has filed dozens of such lawsuits. The firm states that it alone has discovered over three fifty or three sixty perpetrators, teachers. The speaker confirms there are many more perpetrators beyond those identified by the firm because the firm does not have all of the cases.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's the issue in the California Public School System K-twelve? The main issue is that there is an epidemic of sexual abuse in the state. The by teachers, by coaches, and by other school employees. It wasn't until 2012, you could actually file a lawsuit, a civil lawsuit for damages as a victim of sexual abuse in California. And since then, our firm alone has filed dozens.
Our firm alone has discovered over three fifty or three sixty perpetrators, teachers. Wait, three fifty, three sixty? Just in California? Correct. And we believe there's many, many more.
We know there's many more because we certainly don't have all of the cases.
reSee.it AI Summary
I reported to California authorities that nearly 700 freight companies are tied to one quiet Signal Hill address near Long Beach, with about 500 listing the same email. It looks like the perfect cover for fake trucking firms, and the money laundering never stops in California.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
700 companies are headquartered at one address in a small building in Los Angeles County, California This was reported to California authorities and you guessed it, nothing was done Money laundering “Take a look at this quiet building in Signal Hill, California. Doesn't look like the headquarters of hundreds of trucking companies right? But federal records show nearly 700 freight companies tied to this single address. Roughly 500 of those companies list the same email.” This would be the perfect place to put fake trucking companies in Los Angeles County because Signal Hill is right next to Long Beach, California. Long Beach is the 2nd largest container port in America The money laundering never stops in California
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 highlights a quiet building in Signal Hill, California, that seems unlikely to be the headquarters for hundreds of trucking companies. Federal records reportedly show nearly 700 freight companies tied to this single address, with roughly 500 of those companies listing the same email: WTF FMCSA@AOL.com. The segment notes that CRAX reported this exact address to federal regulators two years ago, and asks, "Because if we all know about it and we reported it, why is something not being done?"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Take a look at this quiet building in Signal Hill, California. Doesn't look like the headquarters of hundreds of trucking companies. Right? But federal records show nearly 700 freight companies tied to this single address. Roughly 500 of those companies list the same email.
WTF FMCSA@AOL.com. How ridiculous and absurd is this? CRAX reported this exact address to federal regulators two years ago. Because if we all know about it and we reported it, why is something not being done?
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
WOAH 🚨 Journalist went undercover at the New York City Board of Elections posing as a non citizen BOARD OF ELECTIONS ADMITS TO REGISTERING ILLEGALS TO VOTE The say they won’t report illegals registering "We accept anything that comes over the counter” https://t.co/9iAS4uuWNl
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video documents an undercover-style investigation at the New York City Board of Elections on the 10th Floor at 200 Varick Street, focusing on whether noncitizens can register to vote. Speaker 0 plans to pose as a noncitizen Canadian green-card holder and attempts to engage a staffer about voter registration.
In the first encounter, Speaker 2 tells Speaker 1 that “Everything you fill out, you’re swearing an affidavit that everything you’re putting down is true,” and notes that “you gotta be a citizen to fill it out.” Speaker 1 identifies as “a green card holder from Canada.” The staffer initially signals uncertainty about whether to fill out the form, saying, “I wouldn’t fill it out,” but also suggests the possibility that noncitizens have previously registered.
Speaker 0 observes that the staffer does not state it would be illegal to complete the application as a noncitizen, only that the staffer “doesn’t recommend it.” The conversation reveals that the staffer acknowledges noncitizens have registered before: “We have people who come in here and they have legal situations and they registered, they weren’t a citizen, boom boom boom.” The staffer also admits that they “can’t stop you from submitting the application,” and that there is generally no full background check; “we can’t do our background check on you. We just collect it. That’s it.”
Speaker 2 reinforces that the staff’s role is to collect and submit, not to verify citizenship, stating, “we accept anything that comes over the counter,” and reiterating that “if it comes back to you, it comes back to… If it doesn’t, it doesn’t.” When Speaker 1 asks if they will report the noncitizen, the staffer responds, “No. No. No. I’m not… that’s not my job to report anyone. My job is just to collect the application and put it and submit it to the department.” Speaker 0 cites New York election law—“Under New York election law, section seventeen one zero six, any election officer who willfully violates any provision of the election law relative to the registration of electors is guilty of a felony”—to argue that processing a noncitizen registration would be a criminal offense.
After leaving the office, the pair return to request more information, but the staffer becomes suspicious, consults a coworker, and then refuses to accept their application. The video notes that, according to the staff, “we get registrations come to the mail. We, you know, we whatever comes through, we accept and then it’s submitted,” and emphasizes the absence of ID or proof of citizenship requirements at registration, solely requiring an affidavit asserting citizenship.
The segment concludes by highlighting concerns about potential threats to electoral integrity, asserting that there is no requirement to show ID or documentation to register, and that all that is required is signing an affidavit claiming American citizenship.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It seemed like before you were about to accept my voter registration form even though I told you I was a green card holder.
Speaker 1: I'm just a green card holder. Like, so you're not gonna report me if
Speaker 2: I do this because I No. No. No. We accept anything that comes over the counter. You know, we have people who come in here and they have legal situations and they register, they weren't a citizen, boom boom boom.
So
Speaker 0: How often do things like that happen? Right now, I'm in front of 200 Varick Street in New York City, New York. And inside this building on the 10th Floor is an office of the New York City Board of Elections. Now, I'm gonna go in there and I'm going to pose as a non citizen Canadian green card holder.
Speaker 1: I'm a green card holder from Canada.
Speaker 0: And I'm just gonna see how far I can get in the voter registration process. So let's see what happens. So
Speaker 1: I talked to a gentleman before and he said he could help me with registering to vote. Yeah. It's my first time. So what do I have to show you guys?
Speaker 2: Everything you fill out, you're swearing an affidavit that everything you're putting down is true, and that's it. Cabo seat filling out.
Speaker 1: Oh, got it. Okay. Alright. I'm a green card holder from Canada.
Speaker 2: Okay. Yeah. You gotta be a citizen. I I wouldn't wouldn't fill it out.
Speaker 1: You wouldn't fill it out?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, you gotta be a citizen to fill it out.
Speaker 0: Notice that he doesn't tell me it would be illegal to complete the application as noncitizen. Only that he doesn't recommend it. From here, things get even more concerning.
Speaker 1: The reason why somebody somebody told me that they were a green card holder and that they came in and then they submitted and they were good.
Speaker 2: We can't stop you from submitting the application and if it goes through, but most likely because they don't do like a full background check, but once in a while, you know, we have people who come in here and they have legal situations and they registered, they weren't a citizen, boom, boom, boom. So
Speaker 0: This is a direct admission that non citizens are in fact registering to vote. Something that many claim is a conspiracy theory.
Speaker 1: Alright. Here's the deal. To be honest with you, I'm like, I'm really against everything that's going on right now and I'm trying to do my part. So like, do you mind if I fill this out or is it okay with you?
Speaker 2: Up to you. That's right. I can't tell you what to do. You wanna fill that, fill it out. But everything is clear clearly stated, especially at this bottom, it says American citizens.
You know, if you fill that out and you're not, you know, if it comes back to you, it comes back to If it doesn't, it doesn't.
Speaker 1: But but you But but
Speaker 2: we accept anything that comes over the counter, you know.
Speaker 1: But you're you're not gonna report me or something like that?
Speaker 2: No. No. No. I'm not no. We don't report anyone.
Whoever fills that application out comes to us.
Speaker 1: But I'm just a green card holder. Like, I don't wanna get so you're not gonna report me if I do this because
Speaker 2: I No. No. No. I'm not no. I'm not that's not my job to report anyone.
My job is just to collect the application and put it and submit it to the department.
Speaker 0: Under New York election law, section seventeen one zero six, any election officer who willfully violates any provision of the election law relative to the registration of electors is guilty of a felony. It would be a criminal offense for this worker to process my voter registration after I admitted to being a noncitizen.
Speaker 1: Can I take this with me? Is that okay?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. Take one of these. Yeah. You can take that or, you know, take them out.
Mhmm.
Speaker 1: Okay. But just to be clear, if I if I do do this, you will be able submit it for me. Not a problem.
Speaker 2: Yeah. We'll submit it. That's you know, because we we can't do our background check on you. We just collect it. That's it.
Speaker 1: That's Okay.
Speaker 2: I mean, we're going off your work. I mean, you check off because at the top, we'll ask you, you know, are you a citizen or not? You know, you just check yes or you check no. You know, we get up with we get registrations come to the mail. We, you know, we whatever comes through, we we accept and then it's it's submitted.
Speaker 0: We walked out of the office and ultimately didn't submit any application, as doing so would be illegal. We later returned to try to get more information from this worker. However, when we did so, he seemed to get suspicious of us and consulted a coworker. He then changed his tune and refused to accept our application. Despite this, it seems from our first interaction that this worker was willing to accept my voter registration application when I initially claimed that I was not a US citizen.
How many non citizen voter registration applications has this worker or his coworkers accepted? Why did he suggest he would process my application? We asked him ourselves. Here's what he had to say. This is the gentleman who was about to accept my voter registration form the first time we went in when I said that I was just a green card holder.
Here he is now. He doesn't want to atone for what happened. You mentioned to me that you've had situations where non citizens have registered to vote. Can you tell me more about that?
Speaker 2: Can you
Speaker 0: tell me a little more about that? It seemed like before you were about to accept my voter registration form even though I told you I was a green card holder. How often do things like that happen? I just wanna know, so you were about to accept my voter registration form the first time until upper level management got involved. How many, if any, non citizen voter registration forms do you guys process?
How often does that happen? Because it seemed to me like you were about to accept my form. Can I get an idea of how commonplace this is? Are you concerned about the integrity of our elections? Can we get your name?
Can you tell us any information? Because we're pretty concerned. Can we ask you a couple questions, man? Come on. You're just gonna do us like that?
This is not a good look. So this is the situation out here. In New York City, at these centers where voter registration applications are taken in and processed, there is no requirement to show a ID or social security or any sort of proof of identification. Nothing like that. All you have to do is sign an affidavit that states that you are an American citizen and that is it.
You don't have to bring any sort of documentation to corroborate that fact. This is one of the many potential threats to our electoral system here in The United States Of America. Hi.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
WOAH 🚨 Journalist went undercover at the New York City Board of Elections posing as a non citizen BOARD OF ELECTIONS ADMITS TO REGISTERING ILLEGALS TO VOTE The say they won’t report illegals registering "We accept anything that comes over the counter” https://t.co/9iAS4uuWNl
reSee.it AI Summary
I note 38,000 ballots arrived at 3:45 a.m. after Election Day in Michigan (2020). I allege over 100% turnout, 40,000 voters registered two days before, 100,000+ mismatched poll-book votes, and names on processed ballots not matching electronic records. I claim 17,327 dead voters, blocked poll challengers, nameless ballots, impossible birth years, backdated entries with fake dates, and up to 120% turnout.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
WOAH 🚨 38,000 ballots arrived at 3:45 a.m. after Election Day in Michigan during the 2020 election - OVER 100% VOTER TURNOUT - 40,000 voters registered to vote 2 DAYS BEFORE the election - Over 100,000 votes “mismatched” in poll books - NONE of the names on processed ballots were found in the regular electronic poll books - 17,327 dead people voted, verified with Michigan online obituaries - Poll challengers were not allowed to continue legal duties - Ballots with no attached names - Ballots with impossible details, like a person born in 1921 but supposedly registered to vote in 1900 (21 years before birth) - Ballots observed being backdated from November 4 to November 2, with poll workers entering data, including fake dates - As much as a 120% voter turnout (clear voter fraud)
Video Transcript AI Summary
Key points from the testimonies:
- There is a contention that ballots were run through the counting process multiple times, possibly thousands, with Speaker 0 noting statements that ballots could have been counted up to 30,000 times. When examining the poll book and comparing it to the votes cast, it is asked whether the numbers would align with the total votes from Detroit.
- Speaker 2 asserts that the poll book is "completely off," with Speaker 3 estimating an error of over 100,000 in the poll book. A Downriver resident explains arriving at 3:40 a.m. due to 38,000 ballots that were “ride here” and “sitting over there and getting counted,” framing this as an eye-opening revelation about hypocrisy.
- Security measures are described as unusual: Speaker 3 notes that windows are being taped up so challengers cannot see in, or out, raising questions about transparency.
- Speaker 4 describes observing that none of the names on ballots were being scanned from the ballots into electronic poll books; instead, names appeared only on supplemental sheets. They note electronic poll books were updated on Sunday, November 1, implying that thousands of new ballots would have had to be registered on November 2 or 3. The speaker began writing down names after ballots were scanned but was obstructed by five individuals, including a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and a top ABCB leader, according to their affidavit. The speaker questions whether 30,000 to 40,000 new voters could have been legally signed up in two days.
- Speaker 5 reports ballots that do not belong to anybody and do not appear in voter registration. They describe ballots with no names attached and note attempts to reevaluate them by placing them in a box. Multiple ballots show several different numbers.
- Speaker 6 explains that, on the tables, ballots are accompanied by a computer screen showing which ballot it is. Sometimes a ballot has no name, but the registration file shows a person born in 1921 registered long before that year (1900), suggesting anomalies. The speaker asks what is wrong with being born in 1921, while Speaker 5 emphasizes a registration dating to 1900.
- Speaker 7 lists egregious items: not allowed to perform duties, GOP challengers obstructed, procedures not followed, backdating ballots from November 4 to November 2, and data entered into computers for mail-in ballots with dates of birth like 01/01/1900, absent from electronic poll books or paper supplement books prior to that. They claim dead people were voting and reference a list of 17,327 Michigan voters over 80 who voted in 2020 and were found in obituaries online. This speaker calls the election described as the most important in their lifetime and in the republic’s history.
- Representative Johnson is also mentioned, with a prompt to question the turnout rate, hinting at a purported turnout of 120%.
Overall, the testimonies allege discrepancies between poll books and ballots, improper registration, backdated or misdated ballots, ballots lacking identifying information, obstructions to challengers, and possible participation of non-existent or deceased voters, culminating in claims of a highly irregular election process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If these ballots were run through multiple times, as you've always I think you said possibly up to 30,000 times, definitely thousands of times Mhmm. Being counted. When we examine the poll book and see who voted and we count those numbers
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Would they then not line up with the total number of votes coming out of Detroit?
Speaker 2: Just later. Later. The the poll the poll book is completely off. Completely off.
Speaker 0: Off. That poll thousand?
Speaker 3: I'd say that poll book is off by over a 100,000.
Speaker 2: Where are you from? Oh, I'm from Downriver. Okay. I'm here because of the 38,000 ballots that ride here at 03:40AM that are just now sitting over there and getting counted Okay. Supposedly.
Okay. And that's why I arrived Okay. To an eye opening of hypocrisy. Let me tell you.
Speaker 3: Something I want you to see, they're taping up the windows. Security's taping up taping up the windows so that people who are challenging cannot see in here and and he can't see out. So it's an interesting development. Interesting development.
Speaker 4: I began observing the process of ballots at several counting boards. I quickly noticed that none, and I mean none, of the names were being scanned from the ballots were in the electronic poll books. All of the names that were found were found in the supplemental sheets. We know that the poll books, the electronic poll books, were updated on Sunday, November 1. That meant that all of these new ballots had to have been brand new registered voters on Monday, November 2, or Tuesday, November 3.
I found it very hard to believe that tens of thousands of people had registered in just two short days. So I began writing down the names on the ballots immediately after they were scanned by the computer poll worker. As soon as I began, I was severely obstructed by five different persons that I could no longer such that I could no longer continue my legal responsibility as a poll challenger. These five persons comprised of a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and one of the top leaders of the ABCB. The details can be found on my affidavit.
Does anyone believe that 30 or 40,000 new voters were actually signed up legally in two days?
Speaker 5: Yeah. And what have you seen? I've seen ballots that don't belong to anybody. They don't show up in the voter registration. There's no name attached to them.
Speaker 6: And what are they doing with those ballots?
Speaker 5: They I'm challenging them. They're supposed to put them in a box to be then reevaluated. But then multiple ballots that have several different numbers. Okay. One person with different numbers.
We have full list of them. We're writing everything down all day long.
Speaker 6: So are they improperly filled out
Speaker 5: and you're looking to disqualify them? They're improperly filled out if they have no name, if they don't have a home, or if the person was born in 1921 but registered to vote in 1900, that kind of doesn't make sense. So but that's not on the ballot.
Speaker 6: When you vote, your ballot is just the balls in which you have on there. What are you seeing? Are you seeing people's registration forms? Yes.
Speaker 5: We are. So on the tables,
Speaker 6: you have the ballot, and then you are able to see next to them
Speaker 5: On a computer screen. A computer screen whose ballot that is. Sometimes, say, the ballot itself has no name, but the ballot is filled out. Okay. And then if we go into the registration file, we find the person that has been I mean, was born in 1921, and it's just a lot of there's a lot that's not right.
Speaker 6: What's wrong with being born in 1921?
Speaker 5: But registering to vote in nineteen nineteen hundred, twenty one years before you're born.
Speaker 7: Following are only a few of the most egregious items witnessed, I was not allowed to perform my job and from what I observed were any of the GOP challengers in accordance with Michigan laws. We were constantly prevented from getting close enough to see what was going on with respect to the ballots. Procedures were not being properly followed when we brought these to the attention of the supervisors, our concerns were dismissed and ignored. We observed ballots being backdated from eleven point four to eleven point two and data being entered into the computers for these mail in ballots. Poll workers were entering ballot information from new mail in ballots including dates of birth of 01/01/1900 into the electronic poll books and processing those ballots for tabulation.
The information was not entered wasn't in either the electronic poll book or the paper supplement book prior to that. Dead people were voting. I sent a website to that effect, and the list that they had up to that date was 17,327 randomly checked Michigan voters that were registered for voting and were above the age of 80. Every name on this list has voted in the twenty twenty election, check for yourself, and has also been found in one or more of the obituaries online. This is the most important election in my lifetime and I think the most important election in the history of our republic.
Speaker 1: That poll book? Why don't you look
Speaker 6: at the registered voters on there? How many registered voters are on there? Did you do you even know the answer to that?
Speaker 0: No. I guess it's I'm trying to get to the bottom of
Speaker 3: this here.
Speaker 6: Zero. There's zero.
Speaker 0: So my question then is if the
Speaker 1: Guess how many wait. What about what about how what what what about the turnout rate? A 120%?
Speaker 0: Let's let's let representative Johnson ask his classic question.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
American Pharmacy Worker gives a behind the scenes look at our healthcare system He shows a medication costs less than $4 to dispense Since the patient has insurance, the insurance company makes them charge $97 US Health Insurance companies should be prosecuted https://t.co/f05nj8IlPJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses frustration over a price discrepancy in a prescription transaction. The core facts cited are: a medication that costs $4 to dispense, when billed to the insurance, results in the patient being charged $97.06. Speaker 0 repeats the puzzling situation: “We have a claim for a prescription that costs less than $4. The insurance wants to charge the patient $97.” The concern is the patient’s likely reaction: they will be yelled at and blame CVS for the high price set by their insurance, even though the dispensing cost is described as less than $4.
Speaker 0 highlights the misalignment between the pharmacy’s dispensing cost and the amount the patient is asked to pay after insurance processing, indicating a breakdown in the expected pricing flow from the pharmacy to insurance to patient. The dialogue underscores the emotional and reputational pressure on the pharmacy staff when patients perceive the price as excessive, regardless of where the markup originates. The closing sentiment, “Love you CVS,” signals a mixture of familiarity and exasperation with the CVS system or process involved in this pricing scenario, though the exact sentiment toward CVS is not elaborated beyond that line.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. Come here. Tell me how this makes sense. We have a medication that costs $4 to dispense. You bill to the insurance, and they wanna charge the patient $97.06 Say that again?
We have a claim for a prescription that costs less than $4 The insurance wants to charge the patient $97 So what are we gonna do? We're gonna get yelled at by the patient. And they're gonna blame us for their insurance charging them that price saying we made it that price. Love you CVS.
reSee.it AI Summary
I reference a memo claiming the FBI planned for January 6th months in advance, including embedding informants and mass arrests of conservatives, and that a Boston tabletop exercise occurred in Aug 2020. Kash Patel turned the memos over to Congress at Chairman Loudermilk’s request. The memos allegedly show the FBI anticipated a contested election and proposed strategies—informants in volatile groups and mass prosecutions—to hurt conservatives, not liberals.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
WOAH 🚨 New memo reveals the FBI planned for January 6th MONTHS IN ADVANCE They planned to plant informants in this crowd and PLANNED MASS ARRESTS OF CONSERVATIVES They literally KNEW it would be rigged because they only planned arrests for conservatives, not liberals “They had a tabletop exercise that they ran in Boston in August of 2020, five months before January 6th occurred.” “The memos, which Kash Patel just turned over to Congress, he just found them recently, turned them over to Congress at the request of Chairman Barry Loudermilk. Who's in charge of the J6 investigation now in the House, showed that the FBI knew there was a strong possibility of a hanging election or a contested election — they even devised very specific strategies. -One of them is to embed informants inside the groups where the most likely political violence or political agitation might occur - The second thing they recommended was mass prosecutions, even for the most minor of crimes, exactly what the FBI did after January 6th. Now, there are two big things about that strategy. It's pretty clear the strategy was hatched months before and that's what they carried out — The FBI, knowing something was going to happen, implementing a strategy that hurt conservatives but not liberals”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion outlines that a year before January 6, the FBI conducted a planning exercise and had specific plans for the event. Speaker 1 states there was a tabletop exercise run in Boston in August 2020, five months before January 6. The memos that Kash Patel turned over to Congress, recently provided at the request of Chairman Barry Lautomilk, show that the FBI knew there was a strong possibility of a hanging or contested election, with both sides agitated and likely to escalate to violence. The memos also reveal that the FBI devised specific strategies, including embedding informants inside groups where political violence or agitation might occur. According to Speaker 1, the FBI had two dozen informants on the ground on the morning of January 6, and recommended mass prosecutions, even for the most minor crimes—described as exactly what the FBI did after January 6.
Speaker 1 emphasizes two major points about the strategy: first, that the strategy was conceived months in advance and was carried out; second, that it represented a double standard because it differed from how political violence at BLM protests and far-left actions in 2020 were handled. The claim is that informants were embedded in both left- and right-wing groups, including Antifa and right-wing groups, and that intelligence suggested a bad episode would occur. They allege that, according to Chairman Barry Lautemux, warnings from informants were strong, but Capitol stakeholders in Washington, DC, did not receive those warnings or pass them along. This, they argue, shows two failed examples of the FBI under the Chris Ray era, with foreknowledge of events but actions that hurt conservatives while not alerting liberals or those who could have prevented violence. The documents are presented as now public, described as stunning by the speakers.
Regarding whether there was any briefing to higher-level officials, Speaker 0 asks if there is evidence that Bill Barr, Chris Ray, or staff at the White House were briefed after the tabletop exercise and plan development. Speaker 1 responds that there is no indication of briefing the attorney general or other senior officials. There is no documentation showing that Barr, the Homeland Security Department, the Capitol Police, or the Washington, DC Metropolitan Police were alerted. The speaker notes that this suggests an insular FBI operation, drawing a comparison to pre-nine-eleven dynamics, implying systemic issues within the FBI.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me get this correct. A year before January 6, the FBI knew there might be some consternation about the election given everything given the Democrats already war gaming it. They thought this thing through, and they actually had plans specifically for January 6, sir?
Speaker 1: Yeah, they did. They had a tabletop exercise that they ran in Boston in August 2020, five months before January 6 occurred. The memos, which Kash Patel just turned over to Congress, he just found them recently, turned them over to Congress at the request of Chairman Barry Lautomilk, who's in charge of the J-six investigation now in the House, show that the FBI knew there was a strong possibility of a hanging election or a contested election, that both sides appeared to be agitated and likely would, it could likely carry out that agitation to the point of violence. And they even devised very specific strategies. And one of them is to embed informants inside the groups where the most likely political violence or political agitation might occur.
That is something that the FBI did. We had two dozen informants on the ground on the morning of January 6. The second thing they recommended was mass prosecutions, even for the most minor of crimes. Exactly what the FBI did after January 6. Now, there are two big things about that strategy.
It's pretty clear the strategy was hatched months before and that's what they carried out. It's not the strategy they use for the political violence at BLM and the far left conducted all throughout the 2020. So a very clear double standard. The second thing is they did embed informants in a lot of groups, including left and right groups, Antifa and right wing groups. And they got lots of intelligence suggesting a bad episode would occur.
We now know from Chairman Barry Lautemux that that while those warnings were very strong from the informants, the preparations of the warnings from the FBI to the brethren of the Capitol in Washington DC did not exist. They didn't pass on the warnings from the informants. So two failed examples of the Chris era of the FBI. Knowing something was going to happen, implementing a strategy that hurt conservatives but not liberals and not warning the people who could actually prevent the violence from occurring. That is the legacy of the Chris Ray FBI.
It's what we now have on open. These documents are now out there for everybody to see. Pretty stunning, though maybe not so stunning given what we've learned about the FBI.
Speaker 0: Is there any part of this that shows that they briefed that Bill Barr and Chris Ray briefed the president of The United States or briefed his staff or briefed senior people at the White House after the tabletop exercise and after they came up with a plan of how to get informants, is there any evidence at all that people that should have known about this were actually informed about it?
Speaker 1: No, it doesn't look like the attorney general knew Bill Barr or the brass, at least not as of now. There's no documentation showing that. There's no mention of it in the documents even suggesting that we alert the Attorney General or the Homeland Security Department or the Capitol Police or the Washington DC Metropolitan Police. So it looks like the insular sort of pillared FBI existed again. These are the same diseases that affected the FBI before nineeleven and you're starting to see the same thing.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Amelie Zilber tells her 6.4 million followers she is so horrified by what she’s reading in the new Jeffrey Epstein files she’s having a hard time sleeping She believes we are all severely “under reacting” to what we are learning and should be DEMANDING accountability https://t.co/mnOHctTlPC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses extreme alarm about revelations described as “coming out from these vials” and questions whether everyone is paying attention to what is being revealed. They fear they may have to explain to others what they are hearing and seeing, and worry they will sound like they are experiencing psychosis because they cannot sleep and feel “so fucking angry.”
They declare they are “petrified” and describe the material as “some of the most vile, most demonic shit I have ever even fathomed” and “unfathomable.” They feel that people are not paying attention and that there is under reaction to these distressing revelations. They worry that, when exposed to such distressing information, people may become numb, a response they acknowledge as a valid human experience, but they believe it is unacceptable in this context: “we numb ourselves and we block it out because it's too much.”
They speculate about others who are reading or observing the revelations, asking if “these fucking fucked up freaks” are sitting there laughing and saying that “everything's out and nothing's gonna happen,” noting that “we got away with the most horrifying stuff” and insisting that it’s “not even humanly possible to believe that this is happening.”
The speaker repeats their inability to wrap their mind around “the fact that these things happened,” labeling it “unconscionable.” They ask, “what the fuck are we supposed to do? Genuinely, what the fuck are we supposed to do?”, conveying a sense of urgent seeking for guidance or action in response to the perceived revelations and their emotional impact.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are we all seeing what's being revealed? Are we all paying attention to the things that are coming out from these vials? Because I'm worried that I'm going to have to try and explain to somebody what I'm hearing and seeing, and I'm going to sound like I'm experiencing psychosis because I feel like I'm experiencing psychosis. I don't I can't even sleep. I'm so fucking angry.
I'm petrified. This is some of the most vile, most demonic shit I have ever even fathomed. Like, it is unfathomable. And I feel like people are not paying attention. I feel like we are under reacting.
I feel like I'm very worried that when we are exposed to such distressing information, like, are being overloaded with the most appalling news ever that we numb. We numb ourselves and we block it out because it's too much, which is like a totally valid human experience and thing to do. But, like, we cannot do that. We cannot do that because, like, are these fucking fucked up freaks, like, sitting there laughing, being like, well, everything's out and nothing's gonna happen and, like, look, we got away with it. And, like, we got away with the most horrifying stuff that like, it's not even humanly possible to believe that this is happening.
Like, I I literally cannot wrap my mind around the fact that these things happened. It is unconscionable. And, like, what the fuck are we supposed to do? Genuinely, what the fuck are we supposed to do?
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that the Office of the Legislative Auditor found Minnesota Democrats did no site visits for nearly $200 million in annual grants to addiction and mental health providers. When asked for evidence, they allegedly created fake documents and backdated them. The OLA called this egregious—records didn’t exist, then appeared, some backdated two years. The BHA failed to ensure providers did the work; no site visits were conducted.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
The Office of the Legislative Auditor reveals Minnesota Democrats have done NO SITE VISITS for $200 million dollars worth of grants PER YEAR to addiction and mental health service providers When they asked for evidence, Democrats just created fake documents and then backdated them to pretend they had records “This was definitely the most egregious thing I have seen, maybe in my whole time working at OLA — Office of the Legislative Auditor released a damning report finding state employees fabricating records to cover up mismanagement of money, tax money. — So these documents should exist. They didn't. We asked for them. All of a sudden, they now exist. And in at least one case, it was created wholesale and backdated by two years to give the impression that it had always been there and been done on time” “The OLA audited the Behavioral Health Administration within the Department of Human Services, which issues grants nearly $200 million of taxpayer money each year to addiction and mental health service providers. But the audit found BHA was not making sure those providers were doing the work. BHA didn't conduct the site visits”
reSee.it AI Summary
I report claims that a protest organizer posted paid protest jobs: $3,500–$4,200 a month for about 20 hours weekly. Nate Friedman says Ehrenkranz recruits nationwide (Chicago, Bay Area, Baltimore) for a nine-week, part-time contract paying $3,400 in stipends biweekly. It also alleges ActBlue funnels billions to groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, which pays protesters and has drawn $7.6 million from the Open Society Foundation, funded by Soros.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
EXPOSED 🚨 A protest organizer has been caught posting paid job positions to protest “Here's him posting on LinkedIn to hire paid protesters — Compensation is $3,500 to $4,200 a month for an average of 20 hours a week” Multiple major American cities hiring protesters Nate Friedman “Naftali Ehrenkranz is recruiting nationwide in Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore. Now let's see what happens when we click on one of these links attached. It's a nine week contract part time paying $3,400 in stipends issued biweekly” “ActBlue has funneled billions of dollars for activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, who is orchestrating the resistance on ICE agents in Minneapolis. Indivisible has been caught paying protesters, and they've received over $7.6 million from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros”
Video Transcript AI Summary
A journalist engages with a person at a park, aiming to speak to someone, and the conversation shifts to a narrative about Naftali Aaron Kranz. The speaker identifies Kranz as a paid protester through GetFree, detailing LinkedIn evidence of the arrangement. GetFree is described as hiring for part-time mobilization support contractors, seeking individuals with four or more years of experience in leading direct action, large-scale mobilizations, demonstrations, protests, and civil disobedience (the latter implying experience with arrests). Compensation is stated as 3,500 to 4,200 dollars per month for an average of twenty hours a week. GetFree brands itself as a grassroots organization, but Kranz and others are described as being paid to protest.
The narrator asserts Kranz’s role in celebrating vandalism, citing an incident in Crown Heights where someone threw an egg at a stranger’s Cybertruck and dog feces were placed on it, describing Kranz as part of this sentiment. They place Kranz at an abolish-the-police rally, noting he was blending in with other recruits rather than leading, with the implication that field photos can be staged for later use. The claim is made that Kranz works with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), and the narrator reports meeting him again at a DSA Tax the Rich rally.
LinkedIn activity is cited to show Kranz frequently posting about recruitment and expanding efforts to win reparations nationwide, with mentions of Chicago, the Bay Area, and Baltimore. A linked link is described as listing a nine-week contract, part-time, paying 3,400 dollars in stipends biweekly, seeking someone excited about experimentation and capable of recruiting and training people to drive turnout to events. Nicole Cardi is named as a figure at the top of the Get Free movement.
The narrative shifts to donations, stating that donations to Get Free are funneled through ActBlue, which is under Department of Justice investigation for foreign contributions. ActBlue allegedly funds activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities, which purportedly orchestrates resistance to ICE agents in Minneapolis and has been reported to pay protesters, receiving over 7,600,000 dollars from the Open Society Foundation, funded by George Soros.
The speaker concludes with a personal reaction to the information, expressing a need to stay away, before the conversation ends with Speaker 0 saying they have to stand there.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm a journalist, and I'm wondering if there's someone I can speak to. I mean, any any Is there someone that I can speak to?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I think they might be, like, on the other side
Speaker 0: of the park, actually. No. Yeah. So said you would be here.
Speaker 1: Oh, no. But other side of park's actually
Speaker 0: Why are you so upset? Why are you so angry? I was angry right here. What? You seem don't angry right seem like really jittery, like upset.
You're just annoying. That's all. Oh, why am I annoying?
Speaker 1: Meet Naftali Aaron Kranz. He's a paid protester through and through. Here's him posting on LinkedIn to hire paid protesters for the company he works for called GetFree. Listen to this. GetFree is hiring for part time mobilization support contractor.
That just means paid protester. We're seeking out people with four plus years of experience in leading direct action and large scale mobilizations, demonstrations, protests, and civil disobedience, which just means experience getting arrested. Compensation is 3,500 to $4,200 a month for an average of twenty hours a week. Get Free on their website calls themselves a grassroots organization when Naftali and others are literally being paid to protest. Get Free wants to quote undo white supremacy.
Naftali thinks one of the best ways to do that is to celebrate vandalism, saying Crown Heights stay winning after someone threw an egg at a stranger's cyber truck and placed dog feces on it. Here's Naftali at an abolish the police rally. You can see he's not leading the protest, just blending in amongst the other recruits. He can get his photo op later because the way this works is combining all the leftist causes together to make the individual causes look bigger than they are. And, of course, he works with the DSA, which is why I ran into him at this DSA Tax the Rich rally.
On LinkedIn, you can see Naftali frequently doing his paid protester posts saying, come work with and help us expand our effort to win reparations across the country. And Naftali is recruiting nationwide in Chicago, The Bay Area, and Baltimore. Now let's see what happens when we click on one of these links attached. It's a nine week contract part time paying $3,400 in stipends issued biweekly, and they're looking for someone excited about experimentation and will recruit people and train them to drive turnout to events. We see Nicole Cardi at the top of the Get Free movement.
She says that George Floyd protests were the reason Biden won the twenty twenty election. Now we can see that these protest NGO groups are about one thing, getting Democrats elected. So it's only fitting that donations to get free are funneled through ActBlue, who is under investigation by the Department of Justice for foreign contributions. Act Blue has funneled billions of dollars for activist groups like Indivisible Twin Cities who is orchestrating the resistance on ICE agents in Minneapolis. Indivisible has been caught paying protesters and they've received over $7,600,000 from the Open Society Foundation funded by George Soros.
I gotta stay away. Alright.
Speaker 0: Well, I have to go for a stand here.
reSee.it AI Summary
I heard Congresswoman Kat Cammack allege shocking facts about the ACA: only 7% of Americans are on Obamacare; 40% of enrollees are fraud; people earning $600,000 a year are enrolled; big insurers’ profits rose 237% last year. She says Democrats defend the ACA not to help Americans but to benefit big insurance, with taxpayers footing it all.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Congresswoman Kat Cammack says they’ve learned shocking news about the Barack Obama Affordable Care Act - Only 7% of Americans are actually on Obamacare - 40% of everyone enrolled is fraud - People making $600,000 per year are enrolled - Big Insurance companies made 237% increased profits from the program last year Now you know why Democrats are fighting for the Affordable Care Act, it has nothing to do with Americans getting healthcare. Big Insurance companies are making a fortune and 40% of it’s fraud (but Big Insurance still gets paid for it all from taxpayers)
Video Transcript AI Summary
Congresswoman Kat Kamak speaks from off the House floor about Democrats’ discharge petition to extend three years of Obamacare subsidies. She notes that the fight is happening on the House floor, with Jason Smith, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, railing as the petition moves forward.
She presents several statistics and claims: only 7% of Americans are on Obamacare programs that receive subsidies. Of that 7%, 40% of people registered are fraudulent, described as duplicative and not supposed to be in the program. She also claims that people making over $600,000 are receiving subsidies for their ACA plans.
She argues that these subsidies do not go to individuals directly but to big insurance companies. She cites that these companies are making 237% profits as of last year. Based on that, she questions why the government would send $400,000,000,000 to an insurance company to lower premiums for people making $600,000, stating it “makes no sense.”
Kamak asserts the need to fix health care, not to throw money at a one-size-fits-all program that only addresses 7% of the population. She contends there should be a program that addresses 100% of the needs of Americans today.
Her proposed approach emphasizes lowering premiums while increasing care, advocating for true health care rather than sick care and a focus on prevention rather than maintenance. She opposes subsidizing wealthy CEOs and insurance companies that are already earning high profits and alleging that denials are up while care is down.
The message concludes with a commitment to continue the fight “to the very, very bitter end,” signaling a partisan battle over the future of Obamacare subsidies and health care policy. Stay tuned for more updates.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey guys, Congresswoman Kat Kamak here. I am just off the house floor and you can probably hear in the background, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, Jason Smith railing railing right now because the Democrats have forced a discharge petition to the floor that would extend three years worth of Obamacare subsidies. Now here's what you need to know. And you can probably see right behind me on this TV and then right behind me that door leads to the house floor where this fight is happening right now. Here's what you need to know.
Only 7% of Americans are on the Obamacare programs that receive subsidies. Now of those 7%, there's 40% of people registered that are actually fraudulent. Like fraudulent as in they're duplicative, they are are not supposed to be in the program. In fact, they're finding that people making over $600,000 are receiving subsidies for their ACA, their aka Obamacare plans. Now here's the real rub.
These subsidies don't go to individuals directly. They go to big insurance companies. Insurance companies like, well, we all know their names, but let's be honest. These are companies that are making 237% profits as of last year. So why in the world would we send $400,000,000,000 to an insurance company to lower premiums for people making $600,000?
It makes no sense. We need to fix health care, not throw money at a one size fits all program that's only addressing 7% of the population. We should have a program that addresses a 100% of all of the needs of Americans here today. So here's what we're gonna do. We're gonna lower premiums.
We're going to increase care. We're going to actually have health care, not sick care and focus on prevention, not maintenance. That is how we do this. Not by subsidizing wealthy CEOs and insurance companies that are already making an insane amount of money and making the programs nonfunctional. Denials are up, care is down.
It's time for us to fix this. So stay tuned for more. But this is a fight that we are going to have to the very, very bitter end.
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe claims that, for the 2020 election, Pennsylvania had 205,000 more votes than registered voters, over 1.5 million fraudulent votes counted with a spread under 82,000, ballots from dead voters and ballots received before mail-out, 330k electronic spikes, 682k ballots processed without oversight, and over 1.5M votes allegedly to spread Biden’s win. Georgia alleged underage and dead voters, felons, 200k fraudulent votes, 4,500 from unregistered voters. Arizona: 10,457 margin, 36,400 non-citizens, ~50,000 phantom spikes. These come from public sources.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Donald Trump just posted evidence Democrats are stealing our elections For the 2020 Election: Pennsylvania: - 205,000 more votes than registered voters - Over 1.5 million fraudulent votes counted, and the spread is less than 82,000 votes - These fraudulent votes come from dead voters, ballots that were received before they were supposedly mailed out - Over 330,000 electronic spikes from the voting machine - 682,000 ballots that were illegally processed without any oversight whatsoever - More than 1.5 million votes in Pennsylvania is apparently what it took for Joe Biden to steal the state Georgia: - 66,248 underage voters voted in Georgia. 10,315 dead people voted - 2,500 convicted felons voted - Nearly 200,000 votes were fraudulently inserted into the vote count instantaneously - 4,500 votes come from unregistered voters. Arizona: - The final result is only a difference of 10,457, yet 36,400 non-citizens voted in the state - Arizona also experienced phantom spikes from the voting machines to the tune of roughly 50,000 additional votes going to Joe Biden “These numbers come from information that is publicly available, whether from the Secretary of State's website before the content was removed, or from the raw data that was pushed out on election night”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 1,500,000 fraudulent votes counted, and the spread is less than 82,000 votes. These fraudulent votes come from dead voters, ballots that were received before they were supposedly mailed out, and over 330,000 electronic spikes from the voting machine. 205,000 over votes, meaning there were 205,000 more votes than registered voters, and 682,000 ballots that were illegally processed without any oversight whatsoever. More than 1,500,000 votes in Pennsylvania is apparently what it took for Joe Biden to steal the state. Georgia has a similar phenomenon that Democrats are failing to account for.
66,248 underage voters voted in Georgia. 10,315 dead people voted. 2,500 convicted felons voted. Nearly 200,000 votes were fraudulently inserted into the vote instantaneously. 4,500 votes come from unregistered voters.
These numbers show a clear pattern that a variety of types of fraud occurred in this election and that Democrats are desperately trying to cover it up. They're going to great lengths to change the narrative of the election fraud in an effort to run up the clock to 01/20/2020. In addition to president Trump's team, many independent groups have completed research on the fraud and the results are staggering. Totaling across the country, millions of votes were fraudulently covered up, changed, or deleted in favor of Joe Biden. The governors and secretaries of state have actively participated in the cover up.
Removing information from their website that is normally easily accessible to the public and depriving conservatives a chance to audit or review the results are just some of their tactics. In Arizona, the final result is only a difference of 10,457, yet 36,400 non citizens voted in the state. Arizona also experienced phantom spikes from the voting machines to the tune of roughly 50,000 additional votes going to Joe Biden. These numbers come from information that is publicly available, whether from the secretary of state's website before the content was removed or from the raw data that was pushed out on election night.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over 1,500,000 fraudulent votes counted, and the spread is less than 82,000 votes. These fraudulent votes come from dead voters, ballots that were received before they were supposedly mailed out, and over 330,000 electronic spikes from the voting machine. 205,000 over votes, meaning there were 205,000 more votes than registered voters, and 682,000 ballots that were illegally processed without any oversight whatsoever. More than 1,500,000 votes in Pennsylvania is apparently what it took for Joe Biden to steal the state. Georgia has a similar phenomenon that Democrats are failing to account for.
66,248 underage voters voted in Georgia. 10,315 dead people voted. 2,500 convicted felons voted. Nearly 200,000 votes were fraudulently inserted into the vote instantaneously. 4,500 votes come from unregistered voters.
These numbers show a clear pattern that a variety of types of fraud occurred in this election and that Democrats are desperately trying to cover it up. They're going to great lengths to change the narrative of the election fraud in an effort to run up the clock to 01/20/2020. In addition to president Trump's team, many independent groups have completed research on the fraud and the results are staggering. Totaling across the country, millions of votes were fraudulently covered up, changed, or deleted in favor of Joe Biden. The governors and secretaries of state have actively participated in the cover up.
Removing information from their website that is normally easily accessible to the public and depriving conservatives a chance to audit or review the results are just some of their tactics. In Arizona, the final result is only a difference of 10,457, yet 36,400 non citizens voted in the state. Arizona also experienced phantom spikes from the voting machines to the tune of roughly 50,000 additional votes going to Joe Biden. These numbers come from information that is publicly available, whether from the secretary of state's website before the content was removed or from the raw data that was pushed out on election night.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report James O’Keefe exposing a protester nonprofit with a $30 million budget, funded by American taxpayers for ICE protests. He says the United States government funds this, citing Make the Road New York. They reportedly have a 501 nonprofit status, file a 990, and received about $16 million in grants. The government funding claim is emphasized.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
🚨 James O’Keefe EXPOSES a paid protester nonprofit organization that has a budget of $30 MILLION American taxpayers are literally paying for our own ICE protests “The United States government is funding this” “Protester we secretly recorded talks about an organization called Make the Road New York. We've never heard of this organization, but apparently they have a budget of $30 million — We looked up the tax returns of make the road New York and found there were registered 501 that file a 990 and they received $16 million in grants” Again, “The United States government is funding this”
Video Transcript AI Summary
A protester, speaking during a recording, discusses an organization called Make the Road New York and its perceived financial scope as part of a broader critique of immigrant-rights organizations. The protester asserts that Make the Road New York has a budget of $30,000,000 and notes that the topic of the immigrants’ rights organization is of interest to those observing organizational funding and influence.
The speaker identifies themselves as being with a union, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). They state that they looked at the tax returns of Make the Road New York and found there were registered 501(c)(3) entities that file Form 990, and that Make the Road New York “received $16,000,000 in grants.” This claim ties the organization to a substantial influx of grant funding, suggesting a significant level of financial support from funders or the government.
The conversation shifts toward hypothetical implications of such funding, with the speaker asking, “Can you imagine what Nick Shirley could do with $16,000,000? Can you imagine what James O’Keeffe could do with $16,000,000?” This line of inquiry appears to juxtapose the perceived influence of large sums of money with recognizable figures associated with political and investigative activities, raising questions about the power and use of funds.
A broader assertion follows: “The United States government is funding this.” This statement connects the funding to government support, implying that public dollars are being directed toward Make the Road New York or similar organizations.
The speaker then contrasts national debt with alleged fraud, stating, “We're 36,000,000,000,000 in debt, or are we 36,000,000,000,000 in fraud?” This rhetorical question presents a dichotomy between debt and fraud on a colossal scale, underscoring the protester’s critical stance regarding government spending and accountability.
Overall, the excerpt highlights concerns about the financial backing of Make the Road New York, the role of grant funding for immigrant-rights organizations, and the perceived connection to government funding, framed within a broader critique of national debt and potential misallocation of public resources.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This other protester we secretly recorded talks about an organization called Make the Road New York. We've never heard of this organization, but apparently, they have a budget of $30,000,000. I mean, if you're interested in in on the immigrants' right organization, you should look up Make the Road New York. Make the Road New York. Make the Road New But who are you with?
I'm just with the I'm with the union. Oh. Yeah. S e I u, service employees, international. We looked at the tax returns of Make The Road New York and found there were registered five zero 1 c three that file a nine ninety, and they received $16,000,000 in grants.
We are in the wrong business, everyone. Can you imagine what Nick Shirley could do with $16,000,000? Can you imagine what James O'Keeffe could do with $16,000,000? The United States government is funding this. We're 36,000,000,000,000 in debt, or are we 36,000,000,000,000 in fraud?
reSee.it AI Summary
I report Forbes alleging Ilhan Omar and her husband run a money-laundering operation. He says their investment firm has no track record, no clients, no SEC registrations, with a DC WeWork‑type office and dubious winery. He questions how they rose from near‑zero net worth to multimillions, implying money may come from illegal sources, including about $30 million.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Steve Forbes, chairman and editor-in-chief of Forbes, says Ilhan Omar and her husband are running a money laundering operation 🚨 Ilhan Omar’s husbands investment firm was looked into, THERE IS NO RECORDS OF THEM MANAGING MONEY, “NO CLIENTS” “His investment firm — It’s DC headquarters appear to share office space at a WeWork. There's no track record of his firm managing money, doing M&A deals, no clients we see, no investment deals or any work it's done. They say they do work in 80 nations operating in. There's no SEC registrations for them as investment advisers. What is going on here? This increasingly looks sketchy, both the winery and his investment firm. Yeah, the winery may not exist and the firm may be just a really a name only” “It’s amazing how people can go into Congress and then become these entrepreneurial investing geniuses, where they come in, she had under $1,000 of net worth, and her husband didn't have much, and suddenly now they're multimillionaires. Is there a money laundering operation here — something is not right” “That $30 million came from sources that are illegal, period”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on Ilhan Omar and questions about a sudden surge in wealth. The hosts reference Omar claiming the United States of America, and report new information from Forbes that the state of Delaware and Washington DC canceled the registrations for Omar’s husband’s investment firm, Rose Lake, for failing to pay back taxes—over $400,000 in Delaware and nearly $1,800 in DC. Omar has claimed the couple’s wealth rose to $25,000,000 from less than a grand a year prior. The hosts note the firm is supposedly worth an estimated $75,000,000 to $150,000,000, calling the situation “weird.”
Steve Forbes responds, calling the situation “crooked” and arguing for an investigation into Omar and her husband’s finances, noting that the Biden administration had previously examined their finances but the inquiry “went nowhere.” Forbes questions how the couple, who reportedly had under a thousand dollars in net worth and little for Omar and her husband, could become multimillionaires. He raises the possibility of money laundering and asks where the winery in California fits in, suggesting the wine venture has a “sketchy background.”
Omar is described as blaming others and engaging in race-baiting, though no public evidence of a winery exists. The winery is said to be valued at $5,000,000. Forbes notes Omar’s husband’s investment firm appears to have a DC headquarters sharing office space at a WeWork, with no visible track record of asset management, M&A deals, clients, or investment deals, and no SEC registrations for investment advisers. Forbes emphasizes the lack of verifiable activity and questions what is going on with the winery and the investment firm.
The discussion suggests the investment firm may be largely a name or shell, and the WeWork office is highlighted as a potential red flag. The hosts anticipate that the $30,000,000 figure could originate from illegal sources, predicting that the wealth increase will be traced to illicit origins.
The segment concludes with Steve Forbes assisting in breaking down the story, with plans to stay on the coverage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. That was far left congresswoman Ilhan Omar claiming the justice department in congress probing her sudden skyrocketing wealth to $30,000,000 in just one year that they have a problem with her living the American dream. You heard her say the goddamn United States Of America. We've got new questions on where she and her husband got all that money. Joining us now, Forbes media chair, editor in chief c Forbes.
Steve, new information coming in in Forbes Magazine. Your magazine has reported this too, that the state of Delaware and Washington DC canceled the registrations for Omar's husband's investment firm, Rose Lake, for not paying its back taxes. We saw it owed more than 400,000 to Delaware and nearly 1,800 to DC. She's claiming it's worth 25,000,000 from less than a grand a year before. How can this investment firm not afford to pay taxes?
It's supposedly worth an estimated 75,000,000 to 150,000,000. This is really weird stuff.
Speaker 1: Well, weird is not the word for it. There's another word for it called crooked, and that's why we have to have an investigation into this. As you know, the Biden administration examined started examining her finances and then that of her husband. And so so surprise, surprise, that investigation went nowhere. But it's amazing how people can go into congress and then become these entrepreneurial investing geniuses where they come in.
She had under a thousand dollars of net worth, and her husband didn't have much, and suddenly now they're multimillionaires. Is there a money laundering operation here? And in terms of in terms of the the firms themselves, they have a sketchy background over that winery in California that she and her husband own. Where did that come from? Where's the wine there?
And nobody can seem to find it. So, there's a lot of smelly stuff here. And that's why in the American dream, her version of the American dream is the Al Capone version of the American dream, Tony Soprano version of the American dream, and that is steal it, steal it from the taxpayers. And so, there's a lot of stuff here. And so when somebody cloaks themselves in the, oh, the American dream, and so you have numbers like this from minus 1,000 to thirty, forty million, you know something is not right.
Speaker 0: Yes. She's also also, like, blaming people, bullying, doing race baiting, race bullying. There's no evidence, public evidence, there's even a winery. She valued it at $5,000,000 His investment firm is real. It's supposedly real.
Its DC headquarters appear to share office space at a WeWork, Steve. There's no track record of his firm managing money, doing M and A deals. No clients we see, investment deals, any work it's done. They say they do work in 80 nations operating in. There's no SEC registrations for them as investment advisers.
What is going on here? This increasingly looks sketchy, both the winery and his investment firm.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The winery may not exist, the firm may be just really a name only. As you say, we work office. Big deal. So that's why the investigation needs to be done.
And, suddenly, all that 30,000,000, I think you're gonna find, I'll make a speculation or prediction, that 30,000,000 came from sources that are illegal, period.
Speaker 0: Thank you so much, Steve Forbes, helping us to break it down. We're gonna stay on the store.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that the largest refugee resettlement NGO is taxpayer funded and funds the Somali American Community Center, whose businesses allegedly sign refugees up for government benefits. David Khait says Congress seeks $5B for resettlement; the IRC outsources work to the Center. We found an almost abandoned retail space and claims that most Somali immigrants rely on public assistance (87%). After three days in Little Somalia, Atlanta, I found: paying to import immigrants, NGOs funnel funds to welfare, then ongoing welfare payments.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
WOW 🚨 The largest refugee resettlement NGO in the country is taxpayer funded and is giving money to the Somali American Community Center The Somali American Community Center building is filled with businesses that SIGN UP REFUGEES FOR GOVERNMENT BENEFITS David Khait “Congress is trying to give $5 billion of your money for refugee resettlement programs, and then it ends up in places like. This is the International Rescue Committee, the largest refugee NGO in the country. They get the government funds and subcontract the work out to places like the Somali American Community Center. It receives grants from the IRC in order to help refugees resettle in America. But when we went in, We found this. An almost completely abandoned retail space which hasn't filed taxes in almost 10 years. Where almost every business is focused on getting refugees on taxpayer funded welfare programs. And that is how the largest refugee city in the country is funded and how over 87% of Somali immigrants end up on taxpayer funded public assistance. We spent three days in Little Somalia in Atlanta, Georgia. The largest refugee center in the entire country and this is what we found.” We are literally: - Paying to import immigrants - Then paying NGOs to send our money to businesses that sign immigrants up for government welfare - Then we pay them all again with monthly welfare payments and programs
Video Transcript AI Summary
The first speaker contends that Congress is trying to give $5,000,000,000 of your money for refugee resettlement programs, and that money ends up in places like this.
The second speaker identifies the International Rescue Committee as the largest refugee NGO in the country, noting that they get government funds and subcontract the work out to places like this.
The first speaker describes the Somali American Community Center as a location that receives grants from the IRC in order to help refugees resettle in America.
The second speaker reports that when they went in, they found this: an almost completely abandoned retail space that hasn’t filed taxes in almost ten years.
The first speaker states that almost every business in the area is focused on getting refugees on taxpayer funded welfare programs.
The second speaker asserts that this is how the largest refugee city in the country is funded.
The first speaker adds that this is how over 87% of Somali immigrants end up on taxpayer funded public assistance.
The second speaker notes that they spent three days in Little Somalia in Atlanta, Georgia.
The first speaker concludes by saying that in the largest refugee center in the entire country, this is what they found.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congress is trying to give $5,000,000,000 of your money for refugee resettlement programs, and then it ends up in places like This.
Speaker 1: This is the International Rescue Committee, the largest refugee NGO in the country. They get the government funds and subcontract the work out to places like This.
Speaker 0: This is the Somali American Community Center. It receives grants from the IRC in order to help refugees resettle in America.
Speaker 1: But when we went in, we found this. An almost completely abandoned retail space, which hasn't filed taxes in almost ten years.
Speaker 0: Where almost every business is focused on getting refugees on taxpayer funded welfare programs.
Speaker 1: And that is how the largest refugee city in the country is funded.
Speaker 0: And how over 87% of Somali immigrants end up on tax payer funded public assistance. We spent three days in Little Somalia in Atlanta, Georgia.
Speaker 1: The largest refugee center in the entire country, and this is what we found.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m citing Rep. Tim Burchett, who alleges members of Congress buy real estate and lease it back to the government. He claims there are federal buildings owned by reps that are rented to the government, calling it a massive scandal. He also cites a chart showing over a trillion dollars in duplicate payments within departments, a issue he says nobody is willing to tackle.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Rep Tim Burchett confirms MEMBERS OF CONGRESS are buying real estate and then renting it back to the government He says there are EVER FEDERAL BUILDINGS owned by Congress reps that are being rented back to government A TRILLION DOLLARS in duplicate records payments “I found out that through government duplication, I've got a chart. It's just the craziest looking thing. And it shows, and my staff has uncovered basically over a trillion dollars of just simple duplication within these departments that nobody is willing to tackle” “A massive scandal, which are Big federal buildings owned by members of Congress that are leased out to the federal government — private buildings owned by members of Congress leased back to the federal government”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Marjorie Taylor Greene said she found the situation in a building that was “basically empty” and questioned whether members of Congress own real estate and rent to the federal government in Washington, DC. She claimed the answer was “Yeah,” and argued this should have been the beginning of addressing corruption. She emphasized she would be different and would be on the front end, aiming to eliminate corruption that has infiltrated committee systems. She acknowledged politics’ current back-and-forth dynamics but said the goal is to reduce that tension and focus on reform.
Speaker 1 asked Greene, as Doge chairman, to continue the work on what appears to be a massive scandal: big federal buildings owned by members of Congress and leased back to the federal government—private buildings owned by members of Congress leased to the government—describing it as “the snake eating its tail” and “the tip of the iceberg.”
Greene described the broader problem as a frustration with the system and warned against a “shotgun approach,” saying they must not be neutralized and must focus on a few targets. She identified the first focus as the IRS, noting that the big complaint with the IRS, besides “stealing your money,” is that you can’t ever reach them and that their technology is not intermingled.
Speaker 1 referenced Greene’s statements about government duplication. Greene said she found through government duplication a chart that “my staff has uncovered basically over a trillion dollars of just simple duplication within these departments that nobody is willing to tackle.” She reiterated the plan to tackle this issue, even if it’s not “sexy,” and to “tackle it,” showing it to the American public, with the hope they will back efforts when changing the structure of government.
Greene reiterated that the aim is to focus on a few issues, start with IRS problems, and address the broader duplication and inefficiencies uncovered by her staff. She expressed a determination to reveal these findings to the public and pursue structural changes in government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Marjorie Taylor Greene had us in there in a building that was basically empty. That was the people that were supposed to be overseeing our real estate. And I asked the question, are members of Congress owning real estate? And the guys that are being rented to the federal government in Washington, DC? And the guy said, Yeah, they are.
And it stopped right there. Nothing, nothing. And that should have been the beginning of it. And that's where I'm gonna be a little different. I'm gonna be on the front end of it.
It's not gonna be sexy. And hopefully, screaming the screaming will be back and forth because that's just the nature of politics. But we're gonna eliminate that, and we're gonna eliminate the corruption that has infiltrated our committee systems.
Speaker 1: You are, as Doge chairman, going to pick up the ball and continue the work when it comes to what seems like a massive scandal, which are big federal buildings owned by members of Congress that are leased out to the federal government. I mean, private buildings owned by members of Congress leased back to the federal government. Yeah. And so that's like the snake eating its tail, right?
Speaker 0: As it's the tip of the iceberg. That just shows you my frustration with this thing. I mean, anywhere you look, it's just, it's, you know, we've gotta not be the shotgun approach because that's where we'll be neutralized. We gotta focus in on just a few The first thing, I think we'll have something around IRS time. What's the big complaint with IRS outside of the fact they're stealing your money is that you can't ever get to them.
Their technology is not intermingled.
Speaker 1: I found out that through government duplication, I've got
Speaker 0: a chart, it's just the craziest looking thing. And it shows, and my staff has uncovered basically over a trillion dollars of just simple duplication within these departments that nobody is willing to tackle. It's not sexy, but we're gonna tackle it. We're gonna show you show it to the American public. And hopefully they'll back us when we go to change the structure of government.
And that is the tip That of the just shows you my frustration with this thing. I mean, anywhere you look, it's just, it's, you know, we've, we've gotta not be the shotgun approach because that's where we'll be neutralized. We gotta focus in on just a few things. The first thing, I think we'll have something around IRS time. What's the big complaint with IRS outside of the fact they're stealing your money is that you can't ever get to them.
Their technology is not intermingled.
Speaker 1: I found out that through government duplication, I've got a
Speaker 0: chart, it's just the craziest looking thing. And it shows, and my staff has uncovered basically over $1,000,000,000,000 of just simple duplication within these departments that nobody is willing to tackle. It's not sexy, but we're gonna tackle it. We're gonna show you show it to the American public, and hopefully they'll back us when we go to change the structure of government.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m an American living in northern India in a small ranch brick home. Our power bills are rising: last month $206, this month $810. How can they get away with this? People around here are talking about protesting and shutting off heat. They’re price gouging the American people, with no repercussions. They get away with it because power companies are huge donors to local and state politicians. Something has to change.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
American lives in northern Indian in a small ranch brick home The power company in their area said to expect bills to increase Last month her bill was $206 This month it’s $810 “How can they possibly get away with this? Everybody in the area is talking about protesting, shutting off their heat — I just want to know how they can get away with this. They are price gouging the American people. There's no repercussions. Something has to change” They get away with it because power companies are huge donors to local and state politicians
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reports an unusually high monthly utility bill of $810 for gas and electricity, noting that neighbors in the same area have similarly expensive bills. They mention that the gas and electric company, which effectively owns the area, has been signaling through the news that bills would be higher. The speaker questions how the situation can be tolerated, expressing concern about protests and the pressure to turn off heating despite personal needs.
They highlight a family situation with three children, including two nonverbal autistic children who require ongoing therapy, costing about $10,000 per year. The speaker asks whether they can continue sending their children to therapy if they must pay over $800 per month just to have heat and electricity in their home. They describe their home as a twelve hundred fifty square foot ranch brick house, noting that it is not large.
The speaker emphasizes a perceived lack of accountability, asking how the company can be allowed to act this way. They state, "They are price gouging the American people." They express frustration that there seem to be no repercussions and argue that "Something has to change."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We just got back our gas and electricity bill for this month and it was $810. Everyone in my area has been saying that their bill has been really expensive this month. The gas and electric company that basically owns the area has been posting through the news to expect higher bills. Our bill was $810 this month. Last month it was $2.00 $6 How can they possibly get away with this?
I mean, like everybody in the area is talking about protesting, shutting off their heat, but I have three kids. I have two non verbal autistic children that we have to send to therapy for that cost us $10,000 a year. And now I'm like, can we even send them to therapy if we have to pay over $800 a month just to have heat and electric in our home. For reference, we live in a twelve fifty square foot ranch brick home, so our home is not even that big. I just want to know how they can get away with this.
They are price gouging the American people. There's no repercussions. Something has to change.
reSee.it AI Summary
I allege the Biden admin secretly funneled millions to CAIR via intermediaries, hid the money to avoid tracking, and used it to admit Muslims and alleged terrorists. I cite 30,000–36,000 lacking ID, a wiretap claiming CAIR would pose as a civil rights group while furthering Hamas, and state totals: California $15M, Washington over $1M. I found no direct federal CAIR entry; funds routed indirectly. This is a scandal.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
INSANE 🚨 Senator Josh Hawley reveals the Biden Admin was secretly funneling millions of dollars to The Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR) into states like California and Washington They hid the money so it couldn’t be tracked and used it to bring in Muslims, even terrorists “We found over 30,000 that did not have formal identification. Say that number one more time. I believe the number is actually 36,000. That's astounding. The Council of American Islamic Relations, CAIR, the wiretap from the 1993 meeting in which CAIR was founded, they specifically stated that they are going to present themselves as a legitimate civil rights organization while furthering the mission of Hamas. How much money did they get from the federal government to shepherd Afghan paroles? - I can say with certainty that in California, they received $15 million - In the state of Washington, they received more than a million dollars. Now, when I look at the federal databases to see if there's any reference to CAIR, I don't see anything. Because the money did not go directly from the federal government to CAIR, but rather a intermediary and that is how they've hidden the money. We need to find out where this money has gone. This is a scandal. This is corruption. And we've got to figure out how taxpayer money has ended up in the hands of yet another organization with terrorist ties.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Official A states that in 2022, the office found that president Biden's DHS allowed some Afghans into the country before they were fully vetted, including one who had been liberated from prison by the Taliban. Official A notes that over 50 known or suspected terrorists had entered the United States as a result of Biden administration screening or lack thereof, and that last month the director of national intelligence said that 2,000 Afghans in America may have ties to terrorism. Official A asks whether a formal vetting process was in place, and asserts that the department did not have a formal process at the start of the OAW. Official A repeats the figure and corrects it to 36,000, calling it astounding.
Official B replies that CARE, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, is the organization in question, stating that CARE was founded at a 1993 meeting and that they specifically state they are going to present themselves as a legitimate civil rights organization while furthering the mission of Hamas.
Official A asks how much money CARE received from the federal government to shepherd Afghan parolees. Official B responds that CARE received $15,000,000 in California and more than $1,000,000 in Washington.
Official A adds that when they check federal databases for CARE, they find nothing, and Official B explains that the money did not go directly from the federal government to CARE, but rather through an intermediary, and that this is how they’ve hidden the money.
Official A states, “We need to find out where this money has gone. This is a scandal. This is corruption, and we've gotta figure out how taxpayer money has ended up in the hands of yet another organization terrorized.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 2022, your office found that president Biden's DHS allowed some Afghans into the country before they were fully vetted, including one who had been liberated from prison by the Taliban. Over 50 known or suspected terrorists had entered The United States as a result of the Biden administration screening or lack thereof. And last month, the director of national intelligence said that 2,000 Afghans in America may have ties to terrorism. Did you find that the Biden administration's DHS had a formal vetting process in place? The department did not have a formal process at the start of the OAW.
We found over 30,000 that did not have formal identification. Say that number one more time. I believe the number's actually 36,000. That's that's astounding.
Speaker 1: The Council of American Islamic Relations, CARE, the wiretop from the nineteen ninety three meeting in which CARE was founded, they specifically state that they are going to present themselves as a legitimate civil rights organization while furthering the mission of Hamas.
Speaker 0: How much money did they get from the federal government to shepherd Afghan parolees?
Speaker 1: I can say with certainty that in California, they received $15,000,000. In the state of Washington, they received more than $1,000,000.
Speaker 0: Now when I look at the federal databases to see if there's any reference to CARE, I don't see anything.
Speaker 1: Because the money did not go directly from the federal government to CARE, but rather an intermediary, and that is how they've hidden the money.
Speaker 0: We need to find out where this money has gone. This is a scandal. This is corruption, and we've gotta figure out how taxpayer money has ended up in the hands of yet another organization terrorized.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
This is not a third world country This is what it’s like to drive around at night in Minneapolis, Minnesota Mass immigration does not make America better. It does not culturally enrich us. All it does is turns us into a 3rd world hell hole https://t.co/aZ9g672ArY
Video Transcript AI Summary
You have arrived. This is what I get a kick out of. People and property, but without people, there isn't property.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have arrived. This is what I get a kick out of. People and property, but without people, there isn't property.
reSee.it AI Summary
A user accuses HwaJeong Kim, VP of Saint Paul City Council, of organizing volunteers to deliver groceries to undocumented immigrants during ICE operations in Minnesota, calling for her arrest; another user replies with a link.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
HwaJeong Kim is the Vice President of the Saint Paul City Council in Minnesota 🚨 She is putting together a group of people to do grocery runs for illegals so they don’t have to leave their house while ICE is in Minnesota This is a government employee orchestrating this. Stop putting up with this and go arrest her now
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes immediate immigration enforcement activity in their neighborhood, noting: “It's not even noon, and ICE has already kidnapped five of my neighbors.” They add that they responded to an incident where they believe “a whole family was taken with children.” The speaker emphasizes the scale of federal presence, asserting, “There are more federal agents in Minnesota than we have of the Saint Paul and Minneapolis police combined.”
Community response is highlighted as neighbors take action in support of those affected. They report neighbors “standing in front of known targeted businesses, helping escort workers home.” To address ongoing disruption to everyday life, the speaker announces the launch of a mutual aid effort: “Today, I'm kicking off one of our first mutual aid grocery runs in my neighborhood.” The aim is to assist, since workers “have been pulled over time and time again, attempting to make deliveries to families that are too afraid to even go grocery shopping.”
The speaker also points to growing concerns about enforcement activity in public spaces. They describe “troubling trends where HSI and ICE agents are rolling into, city owned parking lots like our libraries rec centers and our SPPD parking lots.” In response to these incidents, they urge residents to take action by reporting what they see: “If you see this, please record it to the best of your ability and submit to the Ward 5 office.” They promise practical guidance for reporting by noting, “I'll drop the email in the comment below.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's not even noon, and ICE has already kidnapped five of my neighbors. I responded to one where we believe a a whole family was taken with children. There are more federal agents in Minnesota than we have of the Saint Paul and Minneapolis police combined. And yet, there are neighbors that are showing up in incredible ways, like standing in front of known targeted businesses, helping escort workers home. Today, I'm kicking off one of our first mutual aid grocery runs in my neighborhood, an easy way for folks to get involved, but it's because the workers have been pulled over time and time again, attempting to make deliveries to families that are too afraid to even go grocery shopping.
We're also seeing troubling trends where HSI and ICE agents are rolling into, city owned parking lots like our libraries rec centers and our SPPD parking lots. If you see this, please record it to the best of your ability and submit to the Ward 5 office. I'll drop the email in the comment below. See you out there.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m worried the case against Maduro could be dismissed. I say the CIA set up Venezuela’s cocaine networks, and will press the DOJ to drop it to keep details from emerging. The 1993 60 Minutes piece shows the CIA and Venezuelan Guard trafficking cocaine into Miami. The opposition linked to CIA networks; Maduro may have crimes, but a CIA-origin conspiracy makes the case tenuous. I fear CIA pressure on DOJ could derail discovery.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Mike Benz is worried the case against Nicolas Maduro may end up getting dismissed He says the CIA is who setup the cocaine trafficking networks in Venezuela and to make sure details of this don’t get released the CIA will want the DOJ to drop it “The cocaine networks in Venezuela were set up by the CIA, not by Maduro. The fact is, you can simply watch the 1993 60 Minutes episode where Mike Wallace broke that the CIA had set up an anti-cocaine warehouse in Venezuela and then struck a secret agreement with the Venezuelan National Guard to traffic 1,500 tons of cocaine into Miami against the protestations of DEA That was all sold on the streets of Miami to support CIA, Black Operations, paramilitary groups. The opposition backed by the US inside of Venezuela in 2019 is deeply affiliated with the CIA cocaine networks. There are probably international crimes that Maduro committed, but the idea of charging him with running a cocaine conspiracy, which Venezuela inherited from the Central Intelligence Agency itself, has made this case very tenuous. I'm concerned that this case could get dismissed because there's going to be so much last minute craziness going on inside the DOJ as the CIA is going to be constantly leaning on the DOJ to try to limit discovery.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The cocaine networks in Venezuela were set up by the CIA, not by Maduro. A 1993 60 Minutes episode with Mike Wallace reportedly revealed that the CIA had set up an anti-cocaine warehouse in Venezuela and struck a secret agreement with the Venezuelan National Guard to traffic 1,500 tons of cocaine into Miami, with the proceeds sold on the streets of Miami to support CIA black operations and paramilitary groups. The opposition backed by the US inside Venezuela in 2019 is deeply affiliated with the CIA cocaine networks. There are probably international crimes that Maduro committed, but the idea of charging him with running a cocaine conspiracy, which Venezuela inherited from the central intelligence agency itself, has made this case very tenuous. There is concern that the case could be dismissed because there will be considerable last-minute activity inside the DOJ as the CIA is expected to lean on the DOJ to limit discovery.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The cocaine networks in Venezuela were set up by the CIA, not by Maduro. The fact is is you can simply watch the nineteen ninety three sixty minutes episode where Mike Wallace broke that the CIA had set up an anti cocaine warehouse in Venezuela and then struck a secret agreement with the Venezuelan National Guard to traffic 1,500 tons of cocaine into Miami against the protestations of DEA that was all sold on the streets of Miami to support CIA black operations paramilitary groups. The opposition backed by The US inside of Venezuela in 2019 is deeply affiliated with the CIA cocaine networks. There are probably international crimes that Maduro committed, but the idea of charging him with running a cocaine conspiracy, which Venezuela inherited from the central intelligence agency itself, has made this case very tenuous. I'm concerned that this case could get dismissed because there's going to be so much last minute craziness going on inside the DOJ as the CIA is going to be constantly leaning on the DOJ to try to limit discovery.
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that Ring and Flock Safety formed a partnership, enabling AI cameras to pull video from neighbors’ Ring doorbells and link street cameras to front-door footage into a single police surveillance network. ICE and the Secret Service already access Flock; Ring will gain millions more cameras. Ring was fined $5.8 million by the FTC for employees spying on customer videos, turning a home security device into a channel for federal access.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
A new surveillance network is coming to America “Two of the largest private surveillance networks in America just teamed up. Amazon's Ring and Flock Safety have officially partnered. Here's what that means - The AI powered cameras that track your car on the street can now ask your neighbor's Ring doorbell for video of you - They're connecting the street to your front door, creating one massive searchable surveillance network for the police. And this isn't theory. 404 Media has already reported that ICE and the Secret Service have access to Flock Network. Now that network is about to get millions of new cameras from Ring. Remember, Ring was already fined $5.8 million by the FTC because its employees were caught spying on customers' private videos. You bought that doorbell to keep strangers out. Now it's letting federal agents in.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two of the largest private surveillance networks in America have formed a partnership. Amazon's Ring and Flock Safety have officially joined forces, and the collaboration is presented as a move that could change how surveillance data is accessed and used. The partnership is described as enabling Ring and Flock to interconnect their systems in a way that expands the reach of video data in public and semi-public spaces.
The summary asserts that the AI-powered cameras used to track vehicles on the street can now request video from neighbors' Ring doorbells. In practical terms, this means the street-level cameras could obtain footage from front-door devices, effectively creating a link between street surveillance and doorbell cameras. The result is characterized as “one massive searchable surveillance network for the police,” implying broad access to footage for investigative or monitoring purposes.
The claim is that this development is not hypothetical. Four0four Media reportedly documented that ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and the Secret Service already have access to Flock's network. With Ring entering the mix, the network is said to be poised to gain millions of additional camera endpoints, further expanding the pool of video data available for review by authorities.
The transcript recalls Ring’s regulatory history, noting that Ring had been fined $5,800,000 by the FTC because its employees were reported to have spied on customers’ private videos. The implication drawn is that Ring’s devices were purchased by consumers to deter unauthorized access and intrusions, but the partnership with Flock is framed as a move that extends access to federal agents.
The closing emphasis is on the expansion of access to surveillance footage as a direct consequence of Ring’s collaboration with Flock Safety, highlighting a transition from consumer use to broader, potentially federal-level access to video data across a combined network. The overall message conveys concern about the scale and implications of integrating street-level and doorbell video systems, and the potential for law enforcement to draw from a larger, interconnected pool of footage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Two of the largest private surveillance networks in America just teamed up. Amazon's Ring and Flock Safety have officially partnered. Here's what that means. The AI powered cameras that track your car on the street can now ask your neighbor's Ring doorbell for video of you. They're connecting the street to your front door, creating one massive searchable surveillance network for the police.
And this isn't theory. Four zero four Media has already reported that ICE and the Secret Service have access to Flock's network. Now that network is about to get millions of new cameras from Ring. Remember, Ring was already fined $5,800,000 by the FTC because its employees were caught spying on customers' private videos. You bought that doorbell to keep strangers out.
Now it's letting federal agents in.
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned Ring and Flock Safety have partnered, linking street cameras with Ring doorbells to form a nationwide, searchable police network. AI cams can ping neighbors’ Ring devices for video, connecting street and home. This isn’t theoretical: ICE and the Secret Service already access Flock. Ring will gain millions more cameras despite its $5.8 million FTC penalty for employees spying on customers; the doorbell now invites federal agents in.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
A new surveillance network is coming to America “Two of the largest private surveillance networks in America just teamed up. Amazon's Ring and Flock Safety have officially partnered. Here's what that means - The AI powered cameras that track your car on the street can now ask your neighbor's Ring doorbell for video of you - They're connecting the street to your front door, creating one massive searchable surveillance network for the police. And this isn't theory. 404 Media has already reported that ICE and the Secret Service have access to Flock Network. Now that network is about to get millions of new cameras from Ring. Remember, Ring was already fined $5.8 million by the FTC because its employees were caught spying on customers' private videos. You bought that doorbell to keep strangers out. Now it's letting federal agents in.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two of the largest private surveillance networks in America have teamed up: Amazon's Ring and Flock Safety. The partnership means the AI-powered cameras that track cars on the street can now ask neighboring Ring doorbells for video of you, effectively connecting the street to your front door and creating one massive searchable surveillance network for the police. Four zero four Media has reported that ICE and the Secret Service have access to Flock's network, and with this partnership, that network is about to gain millions of new cameras from Ring. Ring was previously fined $5,800,000 by the FTC because its employees were caught spying on customers' private videos. You bought that doorbell to keep strangers out, and now it's letting federal agents in.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Two of the largest private surveillance networks in America just teamed up. Amazon's Ring and Flock Safety have officially partnered. Here's what that means. The AI powered cameras that track your car on the street can now ask your neighbor's Ring doorbell for video of you. They're connecting the street to your front door, creating one massive searchable surveillance network for the police.
And this isn't theory. Four zero four Media has already reported that ICE and the Secret Service have access to Flock's network. Now that network is about to get millions of new cameras from Ring. Remember, Ring was already fined $5,800,000 by the FTC because its employees were caught spying on customers' private videos. You bought that doorbell to keep strangers out.
Now it's letting federal agents in.
reSee.it AI Summary
WallStreetApes claimed Minneapolis residents are rallying to use the Second Amendment against federal officers, calling it a real insurrection by liberals. Snoopsmom123 replied by recalling Biden’s past warnings about sanctuary cities and his stance on enforcing federal law, accusing the opposing side of playing with people’s lives.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Minneapolis residents are calling to use their Second Amendment Right against the Federal Government They are rallying their residents to fight back with guns against federal officers This is a REAL insurrection. A liberal insurrection against America https://t.co/f68Jse9sxd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that, just like George Floyd, there must be violent action: “we're not gonna… tear this motherfucker up.” They claim the second amendment is to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government, stating, “Google it. It's to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government. That's true.” They insist the police should be on “our side fighting, pointing their guns at the fucking government,” and assert, “It's the facts.” They emphasize that the Second Amendment is not for hunting or self-defense, but to protect from tyranny.
The speaker expresses personal fear and anger: “I have a little baby,” and asserts, “You put a gun to my baby's head. I'm gonna hurt somebody.” They claim the government is harming them and their community: “That's what they're doing to us.” They identify as not Hispanic and formerly lived comfortably, but now fear for life quality, saying, “I'm black. I used be sitting home smoking my weed, enjoying my money, but I'll die about this shit. I'll have no quality of life left.”
They describe difficulties related to immigration status and fear of consequences: their wife, who is documented with a work permit, “won't go to work because they'll take her still.” They claim confiscations of people with documents and even children, and declare that “they're taking people that have documents. They're taking kids.” They declare the world is ending for them and their community and assert the environment as intolerable.
The speaker references political outrage and perceived hypocrisy in leadership, noting, “They go snatch the president of Venezuela, but our fucking president is a sex offender.” They suggest drastic action: “Why are we not the White House dragging him out by his fucking collar? That’s where we gotta go, you guys, to White House.” They describe the situation as unsustainable and dismiss what they call “bullshit,” insisting the current state cannot continue. They mention abortion in a negative or contradictory context with frustration: “You can just abort a baby,” implying a provocative or incendiary line of argument.
Overall, the message centers on fervent anti-government and anti-establishment sentiment, the belief that the Second Amendment serves as protection against tyranny, a call for direct action, fear for personal and family safety, and accusations of political hypocrisy and systemic oppression affecting immigrants, Black people, and ordinary citizens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just like with George Floyd. We're not gonna what? We're tear this motherfucker up. That's what the fuck has to happen. Do you does anybody know why we're given the second amendment right?
Google it. It's to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government. That's true. The police are supposed to be on our side fighting, pointing their guns at the fucking government. It's the facts.
It's not for hunting. It's not for self defense. It's to protect ourself from a tyrannical government. It don't get no worse than this. It don't.
Yep. What the fuck? I know that, sir. What the fuck? I have a little baby.
I have a little fucking baby, man. And it's like I had you a doctor to protect her from this shit. You put a baby to my gun's head. You put a gun to my baby's head. I'm gonna hurt somebody.
That's what they're doing to us. I'm not Hispanic. I'm black. I used be sitting home smoking my weed, enjoying my money, but I'll die about this shit. I'll have no quality of life left.
If you think you do, you're fucking nuts. We don't have no quality of life left. My wife is a documented she has her work permit. It's legit. She won't go to work because they'll take her still.
They're taking people that have documents. They're taking kids. They're doing all you guys, this this is where the world ends. There's nothing left. There's nothing left.
They go snatch the president of Venezuela, but our fucking president is a sex offender. Yeah. Yeah. Why are we not the White House dragging him out by his fucking collar? That's where we gotta go, you guys, to White House.
This is only gonna go so far. This is bullshit. This is bullshit, you guys. This is bullshit. You can just abort a baby.
@snoopsmom123 - Suzanne 🇺🇸♥️
@WallStreetApes When Joe Biden was a U.S. Senator, he talked about how dangerous “Sanctuary Cities,” are, and he said that he “Would Not Allow cities to ignore the Federal Law.” They’re the ones 👇 playing games with people’s lives. https://t.co/xIoQTZZT46
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 raises the question of whether cities should be allowed to ignore federal law regarding reporting of illegal immigrants and effectively provide sanctuary to immigrants.
Speaker 1 responds by explaining that cities ignore federal law because there is no funding at the federal level to support the kind of enforcement required. He references the New York Times, noting that a city near his state implemented similar sanctions and subsequently experienced adverse effects—“their city went in the dumpster,” with stores closing and other consequences—leading to a policy reversal. He argues that the underlying issue is the need for a federal government capable of enforcing laws and asserts that the administration has been fundamentally derelict in not funding the requirements needed to enforce the existing laws.
Speaker 0 follows up with a direct question to Senator Biden: yes or no—“Would you allow the cities to ignore the federal law?”
Speaker 1 answers: No.
Speaker 0 closes with a brief, informal remark: “You okay.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would you allow these cities to ignore the federal law regarding the reporting of illegal immigrants and, in fact, provide sanctuary to these immigrants?
Speaker 1: The reason the cities ignore the federal law is the fact that there is no funding federal level to provide for the kind of enforcement at the federal level you need. Pick up the New York Times today. There's a city not far across the river from my state that imposed a similar sanctions. And what they found out is, as a consequence of that, their city went in in the dumpster. Store started closing.
Everything started to happen. And they changed the policy. Part of the problem is, you have to have a federal government that can enforce laws. This administration has been fundamentally derelict in not funding any of the requirements that are needed even to enforce the existing
Speaker 0: senator Biden, yes or no? Would you allow the cities to ignore the federal law?
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: You okay.
reSee.it AI Summary
I heard Nick Shirley claim that Somalians block-by-block ballot harvest in Minnesota: one Somali collects all ballots for entire complexes—nine ballots per apartment—and submits them for Democrats with no tracking. A major, massive complex where one group votes for one candidate; one person collects ballots and there’s no tracking. He says 100,000+ people live rent-free, drive vehicles you paid for, eat food you paid for, and all vote together via ballot harvesting.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
🚨 Nick Shirley interview exposes Somalians go block to block ballot harvesting in Minnesota They’ll have 1 Somalian go collect all the ballots for entire complexes, sometimes ‘9 ballots’ per apartment home, and then submit them all for Democrats, “nobody tracks” WHAT IS THIS?!?! “Major massive apartment complex — That entire block will then go and vote for one specific candidate — They'll have one person go there and collect all the ballots and nobody tracks. They could say they have 9 people living in an apartment. They're going to send them 9 ballots and then they have someone who comes along and collects all the ballots.” “You're talking probably 100,000 or more people, and they're all living rent free. They're driving a vehicle that you paid for. They're eating food that you paid for. Everything they do is something that you paid for.” “They all vote together and there's ballot harvesting”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss what they describe as a mass and opaque operation affecting elections. They claim that the total amount involved is “way beyond anybody’s imagination” and that neither the state nor the federal government knows it. They allege that a judge would bow to the head of the “Somalian mafia,” and describe the situation as a voting block whose members will vote together. They state that if someone does something against “our community,” they will vote for that person’s opponent, asserting that there is ballot harvesting and that they have witnessed it firsthand. The implication is that the voting bloc coordinates to influence election outcomes.
They describe Cedar Riverside as a major, massive apartment complex and ask how many Somalis live there, noting that there are “one complex” and “20 more just like this around the Twin Cities,” totaling “probably a 100,000 or more people.” They claim these people are all Somali and are “living rent free.” They further claim they are driving vehicles paid for by others, eating food paid for by others, and that “they’re everything they do is something that you paid for,” implying that public funds or subsidies support them.
The speakers allege that an entire block will vote for a single candidate, with “one person” going to collect all the ballots. They assert there is no tracking and that there could be multiple people living in an apartment, possibly nine ballots, with someone then “collect[ing] all the ballots.” The dialogue emphasizes a coordinated effort to manipulate voting outcomes through ballot collection and bloc voting, portraying the Somali community as organized to vote as a unified force in elections while alleging widespread use of ballot harvesting and ballot collection practices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here, and it's way beyond anybody's imagination, the total amount. The state doesn't even know. The feds don't even know.
Speaker 1: And so for instance,
Speaker 0: why would that judge bow down to the head of the Somalian mafia here? What I can tell you is that it's a voting block, and what they say is if you do something to go against our community, we're gonna vote for and they all vote together, and there's ballot harvesting. I've seen them do it, that we're gonna vote for your opponent unless you do what we tell
Speaker 1: you to do. And so
Speaker 0: it's all purely for votes. Yes. And so this building right here, Cedar Riverside, major massive apartment complex. How many Somalians do you think live in there, for instance? Well, this is just one complex.
You've got 20 more just like this around the Twin Cities, and they're all Somali. You're talking probably a 100,000 or more people, and they're all living rent free. They're driving a vehicle that you paid for. They're eating food that you paid for. They're everything they do is is something that you paid for.
And for instance, that entire block will then go and vote for one specific candidate. They'll have one person go there and collect all the ballots, and nobody tracks they could say they have nine people living in an apartment. They're gonna send them nine ballots. And then they have someone who comes along, collects
Speaker 1: all
Speaker 0: the ballots,
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting four protests across NY, IL, FL, and MA with identical white signs in black letters, each made in under 24 hours. It looks paid and organized. Portland also had the same signs.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
CHECK THIS OUT They’re getting sloppy 4 protests in 4 different states, pay very close attention to solid white signs with black letter writing 4 protests in 4 different states all have the EXACT SAME signs made in under 24 hours Proof this is all PAID and ORGANIZED 1) New York City 2) Chicago Illinois 3) Orlando, Florida 4) Boston, Massachusetts I also checked the Portland, Oregons protest and they too have the same signs
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that the Hands Off Venezuela protest in NYC for Maduro is organized by The People’s Forum. The NGO has received over $20 million from Neville Roy Singham, a Shanghai-based billionaire with CCP ties who funds media echoing Chinese state narratives.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
EXPOSED 🚨 The “Hands Off Venezuela” protest taking place in New York City supporting Nicolas Maduro is being organized by ‘The People’s Forum’ The People’s Forum is a NGO that has received over $20 million dollars from a billionaire who lives in China with ties to the CCP The NGOs primary funding over $20 million Neville Roy Singham - Singham’s residence in Shanghai. - His business ties are to the CCP - He attends CCP-related events - He funds media outlets echoing Chinese state narratives
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Democrat Congress Reps defend Maduro and condone Trump ordering strikes without congressional approval. Here are Biden-era strikes without approval: Yemen Jan 11–12, 2024: ~70 airstrikes on 60+ targets; Syria Feb 25, 2021: several facilities, 7 bombs on Iran-backed militias; Iraq Feb 2, 2024: part of ~85 targets; Syria Feb 2, 2024: part of ~85 targets; Yemen Jan 2024–Jan 2025: ongoing, hundreds. Totals: Yemen ~931 (US-UK), initial Yemen ~70; Syria ~10; Iraq/Syria ~85; no congressional approval.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Democrat Congress Reps are already defending Nicolas Maduro and condoning Donald Trump for ordering a military strikes ‘without Congressional Approval’ Here is every military strike done under Joe Biden without Congressional Approval: (170 military strikes) - Yemen: January 11-12, 2024 – Over 70 airstrikes on more than 60 Houthi targets - Syria: February 25, 2021 – Multiple facilities targeted, 7 bombs dropped on buildings used by Iran-backed militias - Iraq: February 2, 2024 – Part of over 85 targets struck - Syria: February 2, 2024 – Part of over 85 targets struck - Yemen: January 2024 to January 2025 – Ongoing campaign with multiple waves of strikes (hundreds of strikes) Total strikes: Yemen ~931 strikes (US-UK combined) Yemen initial (Jan 2024): ~70 Syria: ~10 (multiple facilities, 7 bombs) Iraq/Syria (Feb 2024): ~85 targets Zero congressional approval