TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @WarClandestine

WarClandestine
Posted - January 9, 2026 at 5:06 AM
Saved - January 27, 2026 at 4:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I heard Trump on Hannity say the US will begin land strikes on cartel assets in Mexico, claiming “the cartels are running Mexico.” He vows the Deep State racketeering network and South/Central American cartels will be obliterated.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Trump confirmed on Hannity that the US will begin conducting land strikes on cartel assets in Mexico. He says “the cartels are running Mexico”. The Deep State racketeering network is going to be obliterated. The South/Central American cartels are going to be wiped out. https://t.co/BW142m90M9

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that cartels are running Mexico and expresses that it is very sad to watch what has happened to the country. They claim that the cartels are killing about 250,000 to 300,000 people in our country every single year, mentioning drugs as part of the issue.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are gonna start now hitting, land with regard to the cartels. The cartels are running Mexico. It's very, very sad to watch and see what's happened to that country, but the cartels are running and they're killing two hundred and fifty, three hundred thousand people in our country every single year. The drugs
WarClandestine
Posted - January 10, 2026 at 6:03 PM
Saved - January 14, 2026 at 3:36 AM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Guys, something is happening. All the pro-Islam Democrats are all the sudden, in unison, posting pro-Judaism and anti-Hamas posts, after their followers have been screaming “free Palestine” all day every day for years. They are getting in front of something. https://t.co/gYnorvuaId

@GovPritzker - Governor JB Pritzker

Shabbat Shalom, Illinois. https://t.co/3YQft3olzJ

WarClandestine
Posted - September 17, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 4:55 AM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Watters breaks down the Kirk assassination situation beautifully. Not only the cold-blooded political assassination of Charlie, but the response and lies from the Left, confirms we cannot coexist with these people. This nation needs a reckoning. https://t.co/9EvLX6I7vN

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fox News Alert: new evidence in the Charlie Kirk murder includes text messages between the shooter and his trans boyfriend, the secret note that was destroyed, and a confession. Tyler Robinson appeared on Zoom in a suicide-watch smock. Utah prosecutors charged Robinson with seven counts, including aggravated murder, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, and they're seeking the death penalty. Death by firing squad is on the table. They call it a political hit and allege aggravating factors for counts one and two, targeting Kirk based on his political expression with children present. The FBI says Robinson may have coconspirators; investigators are examining leftist groups in Utah for a conspiracy. Text messages include, 'drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard' and 'I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm gonna take it,' with the shooter telling his boyfriend to destroy the note, but police recovered it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fox News Alert. We just got our hands on a trove of new evidence in the Charlie Kirk murder. Text messages between the shooter and his trans boyfriend, the secret note that was destroyed, and a confession. Tyler Robinson making his first court appearance just moments ago on Zoom and wearing a suicide watch smock. Speaker 1: Notice conviction of this offense may carry the death penalty for pursuant to Utah code seventy six three dash two zero seven point seven, a mandatory mandatory term of imprisonment for life without parole or an indeterminate term of not less than twenty five years and that may be for life. Speaker 0: Earlier today, the Utah County Attorney's Office announced they were charging an emotionless Robinson with seven counts, including aggravated murder, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, and they're seeking the death penalty. Death by firing squad is on the table. Prosecutors say this was a political hit. Speaker 2: The state is further alleging aggravating factors on counts one and two because the defendant is believed believed to have targeted Charlie Kirk based on Charlie Kirk's political expression and did so knowing that children were present and would witness the homicide. Speaker 0: Officials say they interviewed Robinson's trans lover and got their hands on a secret note that the shooter left under his keyboard the morning of the assassination and text messages between the two when Robinson was on the run. Robinson texting his trans boyfriend saying, drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard. Underneath was a note that said, I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm gonna take it. The shooter told his boyfriend to destroy the note, but police were able to recover it. Then Robinson confessed. Speaker 3: You Speaker 2: weren't the one who did it. Right? Robinson, I am. I am. I'm sorry. Roommate, I thought they caught the person. Robinson, no. They grabbed some crazy old dude. Roommate, why? Robinson, why did I do it? Roommate, yeah. Robinson, I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. How long have you been planning this? Robinson, a bit over a week. Speaker 0: That's motive and intent. Robinson texted his trans roomie saying, I'd hoped to keep this secret until I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you. Charlie's killer thought he was gonna just go home and no one would find him. He wasn't that worried about getting caught. He was more worried about his father noticing his grandpa's gun was missing. Speaker 2: I might have to abandon it and hope they don't find Prince. How the f will I explain losing it to my old man? Remember how I was engraving bullets? The f in messages are mostly a big meme. If I see notice bulge u w u on Fox New, I might have a stroke alright. I'm gonna have to leave it. That really effing sucks. Speaker 0: So what else did the roommate know, and when did he know it? And who else knew what? The FBI says Robinson may have had coconspirators. Speaker 3: Who else may have been on that thread? What they may have known? Is that fair to say? Speaker 4: It's a lot more than that. We're running them all down. Speaker 3: It's a lot more than 20? Yes, sir. Speaker 0: Cash says they're following every lead, and the FBI is currently investigating leftist groups in Utah to see if there's a conspiracy. In the last year, Robinson became radicalized after moving in with his trans boyfriend. Speaker 2: Robinson's mother explained that over the last year or so, Robinson had become more political and had started to lean more to the left, becoming more pro gay and trans rights oriented. She stated that Robinson began to date his roommate, a biological male who was transitioning genders. This resulted in several discussions with family members, but especially between Robinson and his father who have very different political views. Speaker 0: Now the media has been telling us Robinson's conservative just because his parents were Republican. You don't always have your parents' politics. Look at me. Even though his family, his friends, his text messages pin him as a progressive, and the anti fascist catchphrases on his shell casings and his trans boyfriend. But Jasmine Crockett is still in denial. The reality is that the average person on Speaker 5: the left probably couldn't make a shot from 200 yards because they haven't been playing with assault rifles since they were a little kid. Speaker 0: He couldn't be liberal because liberals are bad shots. That's what they're telling you. Now if Crockett would read, she'd know Robinson accused Charlie of hate speech and killed him for it. And we got angry when we read the messages. ABC called them romantic. Speaker 6: It was very touching in a way that I think many of us didn't expect. A very intimate portrait into this relationship between the suspect's roommate and the suspect himself with him repeatedly calling his roommate who is transitioning, calling him my love, and I wanna protect you, my love. Speaker 0: ABC's touched by text messages between an assassin and his trans roommate. Disney is tickled by the intimacy of a killer telling his trans roommate how to orchestrate a cover up. This isn't a love story. This is a cold blooded murderer obstructing justice. ABC wasn't this touched when Charlie's widow wept in front of the nation. And the far left is acting like Charlie had it coming. Speaker 7: If you wanted Charlie Kirk to be alive, Donald Trump shouldn't have been president for the second term. You need conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when they go to events so that they look to their leadership to turn down the temperature. The issue is right now, they don't feel like there's any fear. Speaker 0: That guy's name's Destiny, and he just learned his fate. He's fired and banned from making any more money on his site. You need conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when you go to events? CNN is defending this guy. Speaker 8: We can't punish people for disagreeing with us. We can't punish people for being jerks and celebrating the death of someone. That's not illegal, and that shouldn't be who we are. Speaker 0: She's right. It's not illegal to say Charlie deserved to die, and they're glad he did. They have a right to say that, but we have a right to fire you. You can't walk into the office and say you're into homicide. You can't work at CNN and tweet, I'm comfortable with cold blooded murder. More people need to be killed. Speech is free, but you're not free from the consequences. If you're glad Charlie's dead and thought he had it coming, I'm supposed to sit next to you in the break room? You're gonna teach my kid at school or serve in government? And I'm supposed to just say, free speech. You're advertising that you're a maniac and that you have no decency, compassion, or humanity. That you're indifferent to death. And not just indifferent, you're sickly gleeful. That makes you a threat. That makes you dangerous. It makes you a beast. And what do we do with beasts? We leave them out in the wild. We have to be very careful about the kind of people we associate with. They aren't entitled to work for us. And these people, sadly, are everywhere. Speaker 9: Charlie Cook committed suicide is what he did. He knew it was coming. Charlie Cook did a great thing for humanity. He stopped that bullet before he hit a human being. Speaker 3: That bullet connected with Trump. How would you have felt if it had connected with more than I Speaker 9: wish that shooter would have been in Butner, Pennsylvania instead of getting Charlie Kirk. Speaker 0: This is more than just a disagreement over the border or crime or politics. We're talking about murder. Would CNN be okay if their producer said, that girl that got raped, she had it coming. Of course not. Or the Ukrainian refugee stabbed to death on a train, Irina, deserved to die. Those floods in Texas, that's karma. Hope you can swim. Never. And we're not saying these people should be put in prison. We're saying they're not walking into my office. I'm not letting them hang around my family. I don't wanna be anywhere near them. This college student in Texas barged into a Charlie Kirk vigil and acted out the bullying ripping through his throat. Texas State University just expelled that clown. It's a state school, and taxpayers should never have to fund that ghoul's education. He's a sociopath. And if he didn't learn his lesson today, in a few years, I guarantee he'll be preying on some innocent victim or victims. So we're not advocating jail time. We're recommending social purgatory until he repents and means it. Society's already treating the cancer. A councilman in Florida got caught celebrating Charlie's death, and now he's facing the will of the people. Speaker 10: Your days are numbered. You're rolling your eyes. It's disgraceful, man. You have brought a horrible name to this community. Speaker 5: I have a recall petition. If you're really gonna make the whole village go through this, it's gonna be done. I we have 40% of this village that's gonna do it. Walk away with respect. Do what's right. Speaker 0: I hope you find God, and your final judgment day is better than today. A country that supports assassinations is a country hurtling towards civil war. It's the very thirst for assassination and the fact that it's tolerated that's leading to more attempts. Charlie wasn't president. He wasn't a member of an extremist group. He was a mainstream Republican. He was on Fox. He had a hit podcast. He was my friend. They killed my friend. But above all, Charlie was a dad. He was a husband. Here he is telling his daughter how he met his mom. Speaker 4: Story time. So we're here at Bill's Harter's in New York City. And right near this very table is the first time that dad had met mama. And it started as a job, I was asking all these questions asking all these questions, philosophy, religion, Jesus. And then I realized mama was beautiful and smart and elegant and Christ like. And so I said, forget this job interview. I want to date you. I said, I have enough friends. And that's where your journey started. Speaker 0: Charlie wanted more than anything for Americans to fall in love and get married and have families, and draw themselves closer to God. There's nothing more American than that. There's nothing more human than that. Anyone who defiles a human life or advocates innocent lives to end violently is an animal.
WarClandestine
Posted - September 11, 2025 at 2:02 AM
Saved - September 11, 2025 at 4:49 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

As it turns out, pushing 10+ years of violent and hateful propaganda, has consequences. Now we have millions of brainwashed left-wing lunatics, who actually believe Trump is Hitler and his supporters are Nazis, and they have been encouraged to harm us… Orwell was right. https://t.co/2wDqPp2gTq

Video Transcript AI Summary
But even as we grasp the victory, there is a cancer, an evil tomb growing and spreading in our midst.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But even as we grasp the victory, there is a cancer, an evil tomb growing and spreading in our midst.
WarClandestine
Posted - September 10, 2025 at 7:03 PM
Saved - September 10, 2025 at 7:25 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

The Dems, and their mouthpieces in the MSM, are terrorists, and this is what their violent rhetoric leads to. We as a People cannot allow this to go on. If we do not destroy them, they will destroy us. I’m tired of pretending there can be coexistence. Pray for Charlie Kirk. https://t.co/8MXaQaICWl

WarClandestine
Posted - July 27, 2025 at 11:10 PM
Saved - July 28, 2025 at 1:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation outlines a timeline of events linking Donald Trump and Saudi Arabia. In December 2015, Trump accused Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal of influencing US politicians with money. During his first international trip in May 2017, Trump strengthened ties with Saudi Arabia. A month later, King Salman appointed his son, Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), as Crown Prince, sidelining Mohammed bin Nayef. In November 2017, MBS conducted a corruption purge, arresting Al-Waleed. Trump expressed confidence in MBS, raising questions about political influence and corruption.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

1) Saudi Arabia Timeline: 🧵 Before Trump was President, December 2015, he claimed Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal Al Saud, “wants to control our politicians with daddy’s money”. Trump called out Al-Waleed just a few months after coming down the escalator, and promised to stop this when he became President. Trump was alleging that certain US politicians were owned by Al-Waleed, who was, and still is, the 2nd largest stakeholder in Twitter, now X, via his investment firm, Kingdom Holding Company. Al-Waleed is an extended member of the Royal House of Saud, not in direct line of the crown, but grandson to King Abdulaziz Al Saud, the founder of modern day Saudi Arabia. On paper, he is worth $16+ billion, but he has (had) access to much more.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

2) Fast-forward to May 20th 2017: Trump’s first visit on his international tour in 2017, was Saudi Arabia. Trump did the famous sword dance and odd photo ops with King Salman. The sword dance, known as “Ardah”, is a symbol of unity/cooperation, and originated as a war dance, used by warriors to intimidate their enemies and show unity before battle.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

3) Fast-forward a month later to June 21st, 2017: King Salman replaces Mohammed bin Nayef (right) as Crown Prince and in line for the throne, in favor of King Salman’s son, Mohammed bin Salman (left). This historic move consolidated power with the Al Sudairi faction within the Royal family, and took power away from the Nayef faction, who had grown as a rival to Mohammed bin Salman, within the royal family. MBS also has a stellar relationship with one President Donald Trump. So one month after Trump visits Saudi Arabia, King Salman revokes the crown from Mohammed bin Nayef, and appoints now Trump ally, Mohammed bin Salman. Nayef was placed on House arrest after being revoked of the Crown, and would be later be formally arrested on charges of treason.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

4) Fast-forward four months later to November 4th, 2017: New Crown Prince MBS conducts unprecedented corruption “purge” on corrupt politicians, Royal family members, including, the previously mentioned, Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, on charges of money laundering and corruption. MBS arrested and detained hundreds do corrupt Saudis.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

5) Then two days later, on November 6th, 2017, right in the middle of this unprecedented Saudi purge, President Trump tweets that he has “great confidence in King Salman and the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia”(MBS). So Trump’s buddy, MBS, arrested Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, and forced Al-Waleed to give up information and $2+ billion dollars. So the guy Trump was alleging was controlling US politicians back in 2015, got arrested by Trump’s ally, MBS, on charges of corruption and money laundering. One of the first things Trump did as POTUS, was go after Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, in Saudi Arabia.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

6) Fast-forward to 2025: Trump and MBS have a stellar relationship, and Trump is beloved in Saudi Arabia. Why? Because I think Trump had something to do with King Salman and Crown Prince MBS rooting corruption out of their country in 2017, and I think the corruption there in Saudi Arabia, is related to the corruption here in the US. Trump alleged that Al-Waleed bin Talal was controlling US politicians with Saudi money. Now the questions are, which politicians were under Al-Waleed’s control, for how long, and to what effect? I’ve got a few guesses.

WarClandestine
Posted - July 15, 2025 at 5:25 PM
Saved - July 16, 2025 at 12:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Trump FBI has launched a significant investigation into Brennan and Comey regarding the Russiagate allegations and election fraud, implicating figures like Hillary, Biden, and Obama as well. Recently, Trump has made bold statements about Obama, suggesting he should face public military tribunals, particularly for his role in Iran's nuclear program. I believe that all these Deep State issues trace back to Obama, who I see as the mastermind behind Comey and Brennan's actions. If treason happened, Obama was orchestrating it all. Just something to consider.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Reminder: The Trump FBI announced they have opened a massive “grand conspiracy probe” into Brennan and Comey for the Russiagate hoax, election fraud, and much more. Meaning, it’s not just Comey and Brennan under investigation, it’s Hillary, Biden, Obama, and more. Trump himself has been dropping some wild posts recently about Obama, including calling for “public military tribunals”. This one was back in May and referring to Obama being responsible for Iran building a nuclear program. As is the case with all of these Deep State crimes and hoaxes, all roads lead to OBAMA. He is the head of the snake. Anything Comey and Brennan did, they did at the order of Obama. Meaning if treason truly did occur, Obama was calling the shots. Food for thought.

WarClandestine
Posted - May 19, 2025 at 2:04 AM
Saved - May 19, 2025 at 3:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
During Trump's first term, the media and Democrats scrutinized him intensely, questioning his mental and physical fitness. In January 2018, they aggressively challenged Dr. Ronny Jackson, Trump's physician, over every detail of Trump's health, even his ice cream intake and life expectancy. In contrast, they overlooked Biden's decline, suggesting a deliberate cover-up. The media's focus on Trump contrasted sharply with their lack of inquiry into Biden, as evidenced by the extensive questioning directed at Dr. Jackson, which was not mirrored for Biden.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Back in Trump’s first term, the Dems/MSM were all health experts, and accused Trump of being mentally, physically, and cognitively unfit for office. Flashback to 1/16/2018, when the MSM foamed at the mouth over then President’s Doctor, Ronny Jackson. The Dems were dissecting every single tiny thing Trump did, from how many scoops of ice cream he had, to arguing about his life expectancy, they even accused Dr. Jackson of withholding information from the public, and even asked about Trump’s prostate health… They had Trump under a microscope, claimed Trump was cognitively impaired, but completely missed Biden? They didn’t miss Biden. They knew he was a vegetable, and they assisted in the cover up. They chose to ignore his decline, while fabricating and amplifying that Trump was unfit for office. This is a supercut of questions from the press conference after Trump’s medical assessment, and you’ll notice the MSM NEVER asked a single question like this about Biden. This is only the first half of questions too, there’s much more. The MSM reporters grilled Dr. Jackson for nearly an hour. Don’t let the MSM tell you they didn’t know about Biden. They knew.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The president's physician, Dr. Jackson, addressed questions about the president's health, including mental fitness. Cognitive tests were administered, but were not the same as a psychiatric exam. The president doesn't have dentures. His ejection fraction is normal. Dr. Jackson was asked about ruling out early onset Alzheimer's and dementia. He clarified that the president had a transthoracic echocardiogram, not a transesophageal one. The discussion covered the 25th Amendment and under what conditions the cabinet would be advised that the president is unable to discharge his duties. The president does have allergies and sometimes takes Sudafed. The president's diet and exercise habits were questioned, including his consumption of McDonald's and Diet Cokes. Dr. Jackson stated genetics play a role. He doesn't limit the president's diet, but makes recommendations. The president's prostate health was discussed, including whether finasteride is masking PSA levels. Waist measurements are not taken. Cognitive testing will continue in the future. The examination's length and number of people involved were asked about. Dr. Jackson addressed whether anything was being withheld and if the president exhibits germaphobic behavior. Despite taking cholesterol-lowering medication, having evidence of heart disease, and being borderline obese, the president has no diabetic changes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Jackson, how much weight have you suggested the president lose? And and he he has not exactly been enthusiastic about exercising. The president kind of believes that we all have a finite battery. Why waste it on exercising when you can put it toward other pursuits? So what did you counsel him about that? Speaker 1: Thank you. Speaker 2: Doctor Jackson? Yes. Thank you. Two questions for you. Number one, there have been some questions as part of your exam. I'm wondering if you talked to the president about this, about the president's mental fitness. He has pushed back on that, calling himself a staple genius. Can you assess the president's mental fitness for office? Speaker 1: Absolutely. Mister Speaker 2: Topalov, president's personal doctor, memorably, said during the campaign that he would be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency. Speaker 3: Do you agree with that assessment? Speaker 4: Doctor Jackson. Yes. Yes. There was Speaker 2: an incident recently where the president appeared to slur his words while giving an address. Did you look into what the cause of that might have been at all? Speaker 1: I did. Yeah. Speaker 2: Suggested that could be related to dentures. Does the president wear dentures? He mentioned the dental exam. Speaker 1: The president has no partial or dent dentures of any kind. Speaker 5: Doctor Jackson, I'd Speaker 6: to ask you, two questions. One is about the ejection fracture. Right. My wife suffers from that, so I I included on the sixty percent. Is that a concern going forward for him? Is it because that, in some cases, indicates low activity Speaker 1: 60 to 65% is a normal ejection fraction. That's not there's no concern about that at all. Speaker 6: A second follow-up on the cholesterol. Over two twenty, do you hope to get it under 200? Speaker 1: The well, we're Doctor. Speaker 3: Clinton, thank you. Could you just elaborate in layman's terms if possible? And you've been doing a great job at that. What you ruled out in these cognitive tests? You know, there have been reports that the president has forgotten names that he's repeating himself. Are you ruling out things like early onset Alzheimer's? Are you looking at dementia like symptoms? And then a second question, a lot of doctors at the back end of a physical like to give their patients tips before they walk out the door, things that they should change in terms of lifestyle or behavior. What did you tell this President outside of diet that he might want to change? Speaker 7: Pretty intensive tests, including a CT scan of his chest and a transesophageal echocardiogram. Speaker 1: No, no. It was a transthoracic. Transthoracic. Speaker 7: Yes. Did he need to be sedated at all, or was there something you were worried about specifically in giving a CT scan? Speaker 8: May ask you a question that follows on the philosophy of the fitness of the president? Yes. The twenty fifth amendment, a lot of people in the country have been talking about it. It basically contemplates that a group of senate confirmed layman will weigh in on whether the president's able to discharge the duties of the office. So you as the president's position have certainly given this some thought over the years that you've been in your role. On on what basis would you, and this is just a philosophical question, advise the cabinet that the president is unable to discharge his duties? How does how does that bar get met? Speaker 1: Doctor Jackson. Yes, I'm sorry. Speaker 9: Ahead. So you talked about dealing with President Trump on a daily basis. Can you talk a bit about him as a patient? Like, what type of patient he is? Does he take all of your advice? And you also talked about, since you were dealing with him on a daily basis, has he had any ongoing ailments or anything like that? You talked about giving him Sudafed. Sometimes it sounds like he has the sniffles when he's talking. Like, does he have any allergies or anything like that? Speaker 1: He he does. Speaker 10: Jackson, just to make sure we're we're clear on this, when you analyze his cognitive ability or do a lot neurological functions, that is not the same thing as a psychiatric exam or a psychological exam? Speaker 1: It is not. No. Speaker 0: It's Speaker 11: Doctor Jackson, does the president do anything at all right now in terms of exercise? What what what what is his daily exercise routine if there is one? Speaker 1: So I was explaining Speaker 11: to me how a guy who eats McDonald's and fried chicks and all those diet Cokes and who never exercises is in as good Speaker 8: a shape as you say he's in. Speaker 1: It's called genetic. That's not just here, doctor. Right. Right. Right here. Second row. Speaker 5: Me? Yep. Speaker 3: Oh, thank you. You mentioned that you gave the president a cognitive test. Was that the mini mental state examination or the full sniff test? Or if not, you tell us what specific cognitive test you Ms. Speaker 1: It was. Speaker 7: It was Speaker 3: the doctor's judgment. Jackson, thanks very much. Speaker 0: Just a Speaker 12: couple of things. Do you have a life expectancy range for him based on his results? Number two, what exactly does the exercise and eating plan look like? Is it you're going to put an elliptical machine next to the bedroom and he's gonna use it? What does that look like? And then also, three, did you see any evidence of bone spurs, which the president said he suffered from Speaker 1: We didn't to one Speaker 12: scoop of ice cream now? Mhmm. Speaker 1: I I don't I don't I limit his diet at all. I just I make recommendations. Speaker 10: One follow-up question. There isn't anything that's a part of the president's health records or his overall physical fitness or any medications that he's taking that you're not permitted to tell us. Is there anything you're keeping from us for privacy reasons? I can prompt Speaker 4: Doctor, can you say, given the president's age, he's somewhat of appeared to where president Reagan was, at this time in his presidency. Can you say, given that there is scrutiny of what was overlooked at the time with president Reagan in terms of Alzheimer's and things he was then known to suffer from at a later date. Can you say that whether the test that you ran would exclude any of those things and what the possibility of overlooking something like that would be? You know, how can you tell the American people that this time, Speaker 3: Sorry. Speaker 0: I Can I ask you a quick question about PSA? Are you are you confident of his prostate health? You, recited a very low PSA. You're certain that's not a product of finasteride masking? Speaker 1: It it may be. You know, I mean Speaker 2: a waist measurement for the president. His weight, I think he said two thirty nine. Right? That's it seems think that's just shy of obesity. Speaker 3: Right? So it you're confident of that number, and did you do any measurements? Speaker 1: We don't do any measurements. Speaker 6: So, Angel, will you continue the cognitive testing in the future? Because of his age and continuing his physicals in the future, will you also continue the cognitive testing? Speaker 1: That's gonna be Doctor. Speaker 2: Jackson, was it's recommended that most baby boomers get screened for hepatitis C. Did you do a hep C test, or has he had one previously? Doctor. Jackson, you talked a little bit about his diet here at the White House. Can you flesh that out a little bit? What specifically is he eating? Is he eating lots of chicken and fishes and white meat? And also, is does Speaker 12: he take any sleep aids? Speaker 9: Doctor Dreicher, Speaker 2: can you say whether your prediction of of good health and no serious events for years to come still holds if the president does not make changes to his diet and start to exercise? Is that still your professional medical opinion? Speaker 3: And then also, can you just tell Speaker 2: us how long the examination was sort of start to finish and how many people were involved? Speaker 1: Yeah. So I don't Thank you, Speaker 5: doctor Jackson. Was there anything that the president or anyone else specifically said for you not to mention today? Speaker 1: Absolutely. Go ahead. And just as a Speaker 5: follow-up on that, some of the president's friends have have told reporters in the past that they think he's a germaphobe, that he washes his hands obsessively and is concerned about that. Did you have you seen any indication, of that type of behavior being around the president? Speaker 1: No. Mean, behavior Doctor, how would Speaker 5: characterize the president's health to an average 71 year old American male? Speaker 1: I'd say Just to be clear, though, Speaker 7: doctor Jackson, he he is taking cholesterol lowering medication. He has evidence of heart disease, and he's borderline obese. Can you characterize that as excellent health? Speaker 11: Mean, diabetic changes as a result of his weight. Speaker 1: He has he has no weight. Speaker 8: Yeah. Know his blood Speaker 0: sugar is real good, but what about potential because of the weight as he gets older? Speaker 1: I mean, yeah.
WarClandestine
Posted - May 7, 2025 at 11:50 PM
Saved - May 8, 2025 at 4:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I refuse to stay silent about this. I watched Alex Jones and others spread baseless claims that O’Keefe had proof of AG Bondi covering up Epstein. Jones even deleted his post after making unfounded allegations about his sources. This misinformation is dangerous, leading many to believe in fabricated stories. Meanwhile, Bondi and Kash announced they saved 115 children and arrested over 200 predators, but instead of focusing on that, people are attacking Bondi based on lies. I won’t tolerate this any longer.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Nah man. I’m not being quiet on this one. I just had to sit and watch Alex Jones, and the rest of the clickbait brigade, peddle complete speculative nonsense all day long, claiming O’Keefe had proof Bondi was covering up Epstein. Now @RealAlexJones has DELETED his post where he alleges that he made some phone calls and talked to some people, and that he has sources telling him AG Bondi is covering up the Epstein files, and O’Keefe’s big “bombshell” today was going to expose it… which of course, did not happen. This shit right here is unacceptable, and now thousands upon thousands of gullible people are believing completely fabricated nonsense, because Alex Jones can’t help but run his mouth. And now Alex has quietly deleted his post, and will fade no consequences for all the lies he just spread. Bondi and Kash just announced that they saved 115 children and locked up 200+ pedos… and instead of paying attention to that, the dipshits on the Internet have been smearing Bondi all day long, based on absolutely nothing. I’m not biting my tongue anymore. This is some bullshit, and I’m not standing for it. H/T @Jordan_Sather_ for the screen grab

WarClandestine
Posted - May 2, 2025 at 11:36 PM
Saved - May 3, 2025 at 4:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
One day, I plan to share my full story about being a victim of Big Tech censorship and a smear campaign by mainstream media for reporting on US-funded labs in Ukraine in 2022. Now, Tulsi and RFK Jr. are investigating the biolab network that the media claimed didn’t exist. I believe my name will eventually be cleared after they tried to ruin my life over legitimate information to cover up their wrongdoing. I will have my vengeance. The video features MSNBC’s Alex Wagner discussing the biolabs and referencing my viral tweet, which they dismissed as Russian disinformation.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

One day, I’m going to need to tell my full story. I was the victim of a Big Tech censorship and MSM smear campaign, for reporting on the US-funded labs in Ukraine, in 2022. Now Tulsi/RFK Jr. are investigating the US biolab network in Ukraine, that the MSM claimed didn’t exist… I don’t know how or when, but one day, they are going to put some respect on my good name that they have dragged through the mud. They tried to ruin my life, over information that was 100% legitimate, all in an attempt to cover up their criminality. I will have my vengeance. Video is of MSNBC’s Alex Wagner breaking down the biolabs in Ukraine story in 2022. They featured my viral tweet in the video, and proceeded to claim it was Russian disinformation.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In mid-February, a post appeared on Gab claiming the existence of US bio labs in Ukraine financed by the US Department of Defense. Ten days before the invasion, the post gained traction on far-right websites. On the day of the invasion, Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs tweeted about discovering evidence of Ukraine concealing a US Defense Department-financed military biological program. Tucker Carlson then discussed the conspiracy theory, which appears to have originated as Russian disinformation. This pattern of disinformation involves identifying an issue, amplifying it through social media, and then moving it into the mainstream media before it impacts the real world. This is the same playbook that resulted in January 6.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in mid February, this this random post appears on Gab, which is like a far right Right. Sort of website. Right? And this post comes up ten days before the invasion, and it says, exclusive US bio labs in Ukraine, and they are financed at the expense of the US Department of Defense. Right? Like, kind of weirdly worded, maybe not from a native English speaker. Right. Then on the day of the invasion, suddenly it gets picked up. It's skyrocketing around far right websites, social networks. Russia's Ministry Of Foreign Affairs tweets that Russia has found evidence that Ukraine is covering up a military biological program financed by the US Defense Department. And eventually, Tucker Carlson, the most watched cable news host in America, is talking about a conspiracy theory that, by all accounts, seems to have originated as a piece of Russian disinformation. Speaker 1: What exactly are they doing in these secret Ukrainian biolabs? Speaker 0: Does this kind of origin story sound familiar to you? Speaker 1: The pathology of it, yes, is consistent with prior disinformation campaigns that we've seen from Russia. So you have your social media accounts. You identify the issue that you want. Then you start amplifying. And then it jumps over into the mainstream. It jumps over from Facebook into the media space. And from there it gets to that final step of hitting the real world. And by the way that's the exact same playbook that resulted in January 6.
WarClandestine
Posted - May 2, 2025 at 1:11 AM
Saved - May 2, 2025 at 4:31 AM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Wow… Here is the bodycam footage of the Dems’ new mascot, “Maryland Man” Kilmar Abrego Garcia, at a traffic stop in Tennessee in 2022, obtained by Fox News. One trooper on the scene said “he’s hauling these people for money”. This is the guy the Dems worship… https://t.co/KiljFnB9wL

Video Transcript AI Summary
A truck with four rows of seats, totaling three seats per row, is observed. One speaker expresses surprise, stating they've never seen a truck with that many seats and initially suspects an extra row was added. The other speaker suggests the truck is being used to transport people for money, possibly to Maryland, noting the vehicle is squatting in the back due to the weight of eight occupants.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are they? The the. Yeah. From from Texas is is good. How many how many rows have you got in here? Four? Where? Four seats. Four rows of seats. Yeah. It's three three seats. Yeah. With with with with it. Yeah. Did y'all put an extra one in? Did y'all put another one in? No. They come like this? Use the the the the truck. Never I've never seen one with that many seats in it. What did say? It's my boss. I I said I've never seen one with that many seats in it. Oh, really? Yeah. That's why I was asking if you put a extra in. No. It's the same Like this. Okay. Speaker 1: You know what you got, right? You know what you got here. Right? He's he's hauling these people for money is what he's doing. But sometimes they commingled open. No. But He you see how Speaker 0: squatting the back of the house? There's eight people in there. Yeah. Know. I didn't know that. They put an extra roll of seats in there. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. So he's getting paid all these people, probably to Maryland, I would say, if I had my guess. Speaker 0: He said
WarClandestine
Posted - April 19, 2025 at 5:04 PM
Saved - April 19, 2025 at 9:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Fauci is accused of crimes against humanity, and I believe the Biden administration has preemptively pardoned him due to their involvement. The connection between Hunter Biden and Fauci's pardons dates back to 2014, a pivotal year when the CIA took control of Ukraine and offshored "gain of function" research. Hunter's company, Metabiota, received USAID contracts for studying bat coronaviruses in Ukraine that same year. Both pardons relate to bioweapon development and the broader implications of Covid, indicating a serious underlying issue we will need to confront.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Fauci committed crimes against humanity, and the Biden regime preemptively pardoned him. Why? Because they are also in on it. Why do you think Hunter and Fauci’s pardons both start in 2014? Because Soros and the Dems are running the offshore bioweapon development network. 2014 is when Obama’s CIA took control of Ukraine via proxy after the maidan coup. 2014 is when Obama offshored “gain of function” research to places like Ukraine. 2014 is when Hunter Biden’s biolab company, Metabiota, got its first USAID contracts to study bat coronaviruses in Ukraine. Fauci and Hunter’s pardons are both about the same thing. It’s about bioweapon development. It’s about Covid. It’s about crimes against humanity. This is ultimately where everything is headed. We will eventually have to cross this bridge.

WarClandestine
Posted - April 14, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 8:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm frustrated with Zelensky and the situation in Ukraine. Trump made it clear that he believes it's unwise to provoke a much larger adversary while expecting support. I feel like I've repeatedly explained how Ukraine's actions, influenced by the CIA and the 2014 Maidan coup, contributed to the current conflict. It's disheartening to see people dismiss these points and remain misinformed. It's time for those who don't understand the complexities to either educate themselves or step aside.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Trump has absolutely had it with Zelensky. When asked about sending more Patriot missile systems to Ukraine, Trump says “you don’t start a war against someone 20 times your size, and then hope that people give you some missiles”. Zelensky’s clock is about to strike midnight. https://t.co/3PWdh03UUE

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes the war should not have started and that Biden, Zelenskyy, and Putin are all to blame. Asked about Zelenskyy's offer to purchase more Patriot missile batteries, the speaker responded that Zelenskyy is always looking to purchase missiles. The speaker stated that when you start a war, you have to know you can win. You shouldn't start a war against someone 20 times your size and then hope people will give you missiles.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But, that's a war that should have never been allowed to start. And Biden could have stopped it, and Zelenskyy could have stopped it, and Putin should have never started it. Everybody's to blame. Have you spoken to President Zelensky, sir, about his offer to purchase more Patriot missile batteries? Oh, I don't know. He's always looking to purchase missiles. You know? He's he's against listen. When you start a war, you gotta know that you can win the war. Right? You don't start a war against somebody that's 20 times your size and then hope that people give you some missiles.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

For the countless Ukraine-supporting dipshits in the comments: We already explained to you a thousand times how Ukraine started this war, because they are controlled by the CIA/State Dept, Maidan coup 2014, Nuland Pyatt, etc etc. But you all didn’t listen. Not our fault you are so easily propagandized and deceived. Either catch up, or get out of the way.

WarClandestine
Posted - April 18, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 8:24 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

🔥HOLY SHIT🔥 The Trump White House repurposed http://COVID.gov to a website outlining how SARS-Cov-2 was a lab leak. Trump and his administration know what happened and they are beginning the process of breaking it to the world. Conspiracy theory no more!

Lab Leak: The True Origins of Covid-19 THE ORIGIN “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” publication — which was used repeatedly by public health officials and the media to discredit the lab leak whitehouse.gov
WarClandestine
Posted - April 18, 2025 at 5:47 PM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 8:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Trump has threatened to withdraw from Ukraine/Russia negotiations, putting pressure on Zelensky to engage in peace talks. He suggests that without U.S. support, Ukraine will quickly fall to Russia. Trump believes he can resolve the situation but emphasizes the importance of being willing to walk away from negotiations for leverage. He holds the upper hand and will continue to push Zelensky until he complies. The outlook for Zelensky is grim, as there seems to be no way for him to avoid a dire fate.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Trump threatens walking away from Ukraine/Russia negotiations! This will force Zelensky to stop playing games and come to the negotiating table ready for peace, or Trump will just let the situation be, no more funding for Ukraine, and Russia will overwhelm them. Either Zelensky does what Trump says, or Trump will let Putin kill him. Simple as that. Ukraine will collapse rapidly without US funding, weaponry, intelligence, ammunition, etc. Trump clarifies that he thinks he will get the situation resolved, but he has said many times, that you have to be willing to walk away from negotiations, which grants him additional leverage. Trump holds the cards, and will continue to squeeze Zelensky until he submits. If Zelensky does not want to submit, then Putin will take him via force. As I have said time and time again, Zelensky is a dead man walking. There is no scenario in which he escapes.

Video Transcript AI Summary
If one of the two parties makes it very difficult, they will be called foolish and horrible, and the speaker will take a pass. However, the speaker hopes this won't be necessary, because they want to see it end. A lot of people are being killed every day as they play games. The speaker says they are not going to take that. The speaker thinks there is a good chance of solving the problem. When asked if they are prepared to walk away completely from these efforts and talks, the speaker says they don't want to say that, but they want to see.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now if for some reason, one of the two parties makes it very difficult, we're just gonna say you're foolish, you're fools, you're horrible people, and we're gonna just take a pass. But, hopefully, we won't have to do that. And Marco and Marco is right in saying we're getting we wanna see it end. Think of it. Every day, a lot of people are being killed as we talk about, you know, as they play games. So we're not gonna we're not gonna take that, and we will we'll see. I think we have a good chance of solving the problem, however. What are you doing? Are you prepared to walk away completely from these efforts and these talks? Well, I don't wanna say that, but we wanna see
WarClandestine
Posted - March 25, 2025 at 7:11 PM
Saved - March 26, 2025 at 2:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The CIA has a history of engaging in biological warfare and creating plans to make their actions appear natural. I believe China is being scapegoated for COVID-19, which I argue was released from a USAID-funded lab in China to divert attention from the CIA's involvement. The media, influenced by the CIA, labeled lab leak theories as conspiracy, while key figures like Fauci and Collins worked to conceal the man-made origins of the virus. As the natural origin narrative crumbles, blame has shifted to China, following a pattern of obscuring the CIA's role in such operations.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

The CIA not only partake in biological warfare, but they preemptively generate plans to ensure that it “would appear to be of natural origin”, to obscure their involvement. This is exactly why I have been saying that China is NOT responsible for C19. They are the patsy. The CIA released C19 at a USAID-funded lab in China to obscure their involvement, then all the CIA-controlled media and entities began their propaganda campaign to declare that it was of natural origin, and anyone who suggested it was a lab leak was a conspiracy theorist spreading “covid disinformation” and was censored. That’s why Fauci and Collins of the NIH went out of their way to cover up the fact that they knew this pathogen was man-made. They were not covering for China, they were covering for themselves. That’s why now that the “natural origin” narrative has fallen apart, the FBI/CIA shifted their blame to China. This was always their plan. They built in layers of separation to obscure their involvement, to ensure there would be no way anyone could trace it back to them. That’s why the media doesn’t mind you talking about the lab in Wuhan, but they FREAKED OUT when we started talking about the labs in CIA-controlled Ukraine and Project PREDICT. The JFK files confirm that the CIA have engaged in biological warfare to conduct regime-change, and go great lengths to cover up their involvement.

WarClandestine
Posted - March 22, 2025 at 11:06 PM
Saved - March 23, 2025 at 11:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Reflecting on JFK's "secret societies" speech, I see it now as a warning about a covert entity within our government, which he described as a "monolithic and ruthless conspiracy." He believed this group was behind the Cold War, operating through military, diplomatic, and political means. I believe this same entity persists today, working to eliminate threats to its power. Trump's focus on the JFK files suggests he aims to confront this hidden influence, which explains why the establishment fears him—he seeks to complete JFK's mission.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Knowing what we know now, JFK’s “secret societies” speech makes a lot more sense. JFK tried to warn us about this secret society. He claimed this “monolithic and ruthless conspiracy” was responsible for fueling the Cold War. He claimed this entity was a “tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations”. JFK was not talking about the USSR. He was talking about a covert entity that had embedded itself within our government. That same entity exists within our government today, and it tries to overthrow/eliminate anyone that threatens its power. Trump started with the JFK files for a reason. Trump is trying to uproot this same secret entity. It never left. This why the swamp fears Trump. He is trying to finish what JFK started.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that secrecy is repugnant in a free society, and the dangers of unwarranted concealment outweigh those cited to justify it. They state that increased security should not expand to official censorship, and no official should use these words to censor news, stifle dissent, or cover up mistakes. The speaker asks every publisher, editor, and newsman to reexamine their standards and recognize the country's peril. Although no war has been declared, the speaker claims the nation's way of life is under attack, and the danger has never been more clear or imminent. The speaker calls for a change in outlook and tactics by the government, people, and the press, because the nation is opposed by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means, infiltration, subversion, and intimidation. This system combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations, and conducts the Cold War with a wartime discipline.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society. And we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweigh the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in ensuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it's in my control. And no official of my administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes, or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know. But I do ask but I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards and to recognize the nature of our country's peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self discipline to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In times of clear and present danger, the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security. Today, no war has been declared. And however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger, and yet no war has been declared. No borders have been crossed by marching troops. No missiles have been fired. If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of clear and present danger, then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear, and its presence has never been more imminent. It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covet means for expanding its sphere of influence, on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned. No rumor is printed. No secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War in short. With a wartime discipline, no democracy would ever hope or wish to
WarClandestine
Posted - March 21, 2025 at 5:32 AM
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 2:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across some shocking information about CIA covert action programs. They were active globally, targeting Soviet influence in countries like Argentina, Brazil, and Italy, among others. The CIA even controlled media outlets and various organizations, including the Black Panthers, to influence public opinion. JFK reportedly challenged these covert operations, suggesting they strayed from the CIA's primary mission and wasted taxpayer money. This stance likely contributed to the CIA's animosity toward him, as he aimed to expose and limit their activities.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Holy shit… the new batch has some juicy stuff about global CIA “covert action programs”. The CIA were operating essentially all over the globe to combat Soviet influence. -Argentina -Dominican Republic -Guatemala -Brazil -Venezuela -Peru -Japan -Congo -Kenya -Italy -France Then a few slides later, it talks about a briefing with CIA Director Dulles, notifying the board that CIA control “Radio Free Europe”, the “Afro-American Institute”, and “various other labor and youth groups”. The CIA were controlling mass media and were controlling groups like the Black Panthers to conduct protests. Kinda sounds similar to BLM doesn’t it? Then President JFK shows up to the briefing, and suggests that CIA covert action programs are outside the scope of the CIA’s supposed primary intelligence gathering mission, and was not worth the taxpayer money. This is why the CIA didn’t like JFK. He was onto their schemes, and was trying to shut them down.

WarClandestine
Posted - March 19, 2025 at 4:14 PM
Saved - March 19, 2025 at 11:23 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

The JFK files show that the CIA were engaged in: -Regime change -Biological warfare -Political/Psychological warfare -Global media control -Mass propaganda Sound familiar? There are so many parallels between what happened then and what is happening now. The CIA never changed. https://t.co/4r9mDnR1l4

WarClandestine
Posted - March 19, 2025 at 6:36 AM
Saved - March 19, 2025 at 3:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared some intriguing pages from the JFK files, specifically the Califano Papers, which reveal the CIA's strategy of using political and psychological warfare during the Cold War. The documents detail plans to infiltrate radio and television in various countries to counter the USSR and China. I see striking similarities between those tactics and recent events, particularly how the USAID/Soros media network has influenced global media to promote propaganda for regime change, reminiscent of the situation in Ukraine. The parallels are compelling.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Some juicy pages from the JFK files Califano Papers outlining the CIA using “political and psychological warfare” to spread their influence during the Cold War. These files outline the CIA plan to “penetrate” all radio and television in every country of interest, to combat the influence of the USSR and China. This playbook should sound familiar to everyone who just lived through the last 8 years, and watched how the USAID/Soros media network controlled almost all media around the globe to push propaganda so they could conduct regime change, a la Ukraine. So many parallels between what happened then, and what is happening now.

WarClandestine
Posted - March 19, 2025 at 12:30 AM
Saved - March 19, 2025 at 3:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it noteworthy that Lee Harvey Oswald traveled to Mexico City shortly before the assassination. He sought a visa at the Soviet embassy, where his request was managed by a reckless USSR intelligence officer. This suggests he might have intended to escape to the USSR after the assassination. Evidence points to Oswald collaborating with various intelligence agencies, including the CIA, USSR, and Cuba, indicating a complex web of involvement rather than him being a lone gunman. Many parties had motives for Kennedy's death.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

A topic of note is Lee Harvey Oswald’s trip to Mexico City just months before the assassination. Oswald visited the Soviet embassy in Mexico, looking for a visa, and his request was handled by a loose-cannon USSR intelligence officer. Oswald was presumably looking for a visa to flee to the USSR after the upcoming assassination. There is evidence to suggest that Oswald was working with not just the CIA, but foreign intelligence assets as well, to include the USSR and Cuba, which would make sense given the ongoing Cold War, Cuban missile crisis, etc. One thing is for certain, that Oswald was not just some lone gunman. This was highly coordinated, and many intelligence agencies, foreign and domestic, were involved to some degree. There were many entities that had something to gain from Kennedy’s death.

WarClandestine
Posted - March 5, 2025 at 5:19 PM
Saved - March 7, 2025 at 3:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m surprised by how many people are unaware that the CIA has been openly sharing intelligence with Ukraine. Many don’t realize that Ukraine acts as a proxy for the US, utilizing our resources while being primarily a US/NATO-built military force. The Ukrainian army is essentially a tool for indirect conflict against Russia, viewed as expendable by its backers. This dynamic escalated in 2014 when the US influenced regime change in Ukraine, prompting Putin's response. In 2016, US politicians assured Ukrainian soldiers of full support to combat Russia, highlighting the US's role in initiating this conflict.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

I’m surprised how many people were completely unaware that the CIA were openly sharing intelligence with Ukraine. Most of the country have no idea that Ukraine is a proxy of the US. They use our money, weapons, equipment, training, intelligence, etc. The only thing that makes the Ukrainian army Ukrainian, is that they are using Ukrainian bodies instead of American ones. Thats it. Everything else in the Ukrainian military is a US/NATO product. Ukraine’s military is an army that the US/NATO built for fighting Russia indirectly. They are a pawn on a chess board, and the US/NATO view them as dispensable. That’s why Putin escalated in 2014 when the US conducted regime change in Ukraine. He knew what the US were up to. He knew the US were planning to build an army on his border. An army designed to fight Russia. He was right. Flashback to 2016, when corrupt US politicians, Graham, Klobuchar, and McCain, were in Ukraine telling the Ukrainian soldiers that the US will provide them with everything they need to go on the offensive and fight Russia. Most people around the world have no idea that the US started this war.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're committed to fighting for your homeland alongside you. 2017 will be the year of offense, and we will push the case against Russian aggression in Washington. It's time for Russia to pay a heavier price, but our fight is with Putin, not the Russian people. We promise to take your concerns to Washington, inform Americans of your bravery, and make the case against Putin to the world. I believe in your victory and we will provide you with the resources needed to win. Your courage, not just equipment, has brought success. The world is watching because we cannot allow Putin to succeed here, or he will threaten other countries as well.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I admire the fact that you will fight for your homeland. Your fight is our fight. Twenty seventeen will be the year of offense. All of us will go back to Washington, and we will push the case against Russia. Enough of a Russian aggression. It is time for them to pay a heavier price. Our fight is not with the Russian people but with Putin. Our promise to you is to take your calls to Washington. Inform the American people of your bravery. And make the case against Putin to the world. Speaker 1: I believe you will win. I am convinced you will win, and we will do everything we can to provide you with what you need to win. And we have succeeded not because of equipment, but because of your courage. So I thank you, and the world is watching. And the world is watching because we cannot allow Vladimir Putin to succeed here. Because if he succeeds here, he will succeed in other countries. Thank you.
WarClandestine
Posted - March 4, 2025 at 2:04 AM
Saved - March 4, 2025 at 2:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Zelensky is unable to end the war because he is allegedly covering up bioweapon development in Ukraine. Elon Musk has reportedly traced this back to USAID's Project PREDICT, which implicates Trump as well. The destruction of files related to Hunter Biden's biolab, Metabiota, and the media's attacks on those discussing these biolabs, like RFK Jr. and Tulsi, suggest a deeper issue. If the war concludes, there may be demands for investigations into US/Ukrainian bioweapon activities, which could lead to serious consequences for those involved.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Another reason Zelensky cannot allow this war to end, is because he is covering up Deep State bioweapon development in Ukraine. Elon already found the paper trail via USAID Project PREDICT, which means Trump knows also. This is why Fauci and Hunter’s pardons begin in 2014. This is why Zelensky ordered the destruction of all files associated with Hunter Biden’s biolab company, Metabiota. This is why the media mercilessly attacks anyone who talks about the biolabs in Ukraine, to include RFK Jr. and Tulsi. This is why Zelensky can’t surrender. If this war ends, Putin and Russian MIL have been adamant that there must be a formal investigation into US/Ukrainian bioweapon development in Ukraine. This will surely be part of the negotiations between Trump and Putin. Putin wants justice for Covid, and he claims George Soros and his puppets are behind it all. Some of Trump’s closest advisors and most important cabinet positions, Elon, Tulsi, and RFK Jr., have also echoed the importance of this exact situation. Many keep asking about what we will find when we investigate where the money went in Ukraine. Eventually, we will end up at crimes against humanity.

WarClandestine
Posted - March 4, 2025 at 3:11 AM
Saved - March 4, 2025 at 9:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I have a huge update on the Epstein files. A "truckload" of documents from the SDNY has been delivered to Kash, who is investigating why some were withheld, leading to Dennehy's firing. His team is reviewing the thousands of files, and Bondi is calling out the Biden administration for sitting on this information. While some details will be redacted for national security and grand jury reasons, Bondi assures that the American people will see everything. I understand the anxiety and anger, but I believe Trump and his appointees are committed to transparency. It's happening; the ball is rolling.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

⚠️HUGE update on the Epstein files⚠️ -“Truckload” of files from SDNY were delivered to Kash -Kash is investigating why SDNY withheld documents (Dennehy fired) -Kash’s team are currently reviewing the thousands of files -Bondi calls out Biden regime for sitting on these files -Bondi says that the American People are going to see everything -Bondi admits some information will be redacted for NATSEC and grand jury information In other words, Bondi and Kash have the situation under control, and everyone just needs to let them do their work. I understand everyone is anxious and angry, but Trump and his appointees have proven their intentions are legitimate. It’s happening. The ball is rolling.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We received a couple hundred pages of documents from the FBI, but a source told me there were more at the Southern District of New York. I gave them a deadline, and we got thousands of pages. The FBI is reviewing them, and Director Patel is preparing a detailed report on why the FBI withheld these documents. These documents include flight logs, names, and victim names, but we believe there's more. The FBI just received these thousands of pages, and protecting victims is a priority. We believe in transparency, and America has the right to know. The Biden administration claimed no one did anything with these documents, but why were they in the Southern District of New York? I want a full report. We will redact national security information and grand jury information, but the public will know why.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We all did. And the FBI handed over a couple hundred of pages of documents. But, you know, Sean, I gave them a deadline of Friday at 8AM to get us everything, and a source had told me where the documents were being kept, Southern District Of New York, shock. So we got them all by, hopefully, all of them. Friday at 8AM, thousands of pages of documents. I have the FBI going through them, and Cash is also now that we have Cash here, it's a game changer, of course. And Cash is going to director Patel is going to get us a detailed report as to why the FBI withheld all of those documents. Speaker 1: Okay. I wanna be clear because I think people got got frustrated because they were expecting more. You were expecting more. And you didn't find out less than 24 before the release, you got a whistleblower that confirmed that there were way more documents that they had were supposed to turn over, and then you found out just before that. Speaker 0: Well, sure. And you're looking at these documents going, these aren't all the Epstein files. You know, they were flight logs. They were names and victims names. And we're going, where's the rest of the stuff? And that's what the FBI had turned over to us. And so a source said, woah. All this evidence is sitting in the Southern District Of New York. Yep. So based on that, I gave them the deadline Friday at eight. A truckload of evidence arrived. It's now in the possession of the FBI. Cash is going to get me and himself, really, a detailed report as to why all these documents and evidence had been withheld. And, you know, we're gonna go through it, go through it as fast as we can, but go through it very cautiously to protect all the victims of because there are a lot of victims. Speaker 1: Well, you had identified in in phase one over 200 over 254. Four. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Okay. Now, is that the only thing that would be redacted? Will everything else be made public that that you get in your possession? Speaker 0: Yeah. The FBI hasn't had, obviously, they haven't looked at the thousands of pages of documents that they've just received Friday. But Cash has a team going through them, and it's always about protecting the victim. But you know what? We believe in transparency, and America has the right to know. The the the Biden administration said on these documents, no one did anything with them. And why were they sitting in the Southern District Of New York? I want a full report on that. You know, sadly, these people don't believe in transparency. But I think more unfortunately, I think a lot of them don't believe in honesty. And it's a new day. It's a new administration, and everything's going to come out to the public. The public has a right to know. Americans have a right to know. Speaker 1: And and that goes the same with the JFK files? JFK files Speaker 0: and health Yep. Absolutely. Speaker 1: What are the things that and maybe some people don't understand the need to redact. In the case of a victim, that should be pretty obvious to people. What are the other things that maybe you would have to redact? Speaker 0: Well Speaker 1: National security? Speaker 0: No. Of course. National security, some grand jury information, which is always going to be confidential, but we'll see. Let's let's look through them as as fast as we can, get it out to the American people, because the American people have a right to know, not only on that, but on Kennedy, on Martin Luther King, on all of these cases that the Biden administration has just sat on for all these years. So, yeah, it's it's it's really it's not sad. It's it's it's infuriating that these people thought that they could sit on this information, but they can't. It's a new day, and we believe in transparency, and it's going to come out. And and when we redact things, Sean, what we're gonna do is not just pull pages out like they used to do. If something's redacted, you will know the line, and you will know why it's redacted. The victim's name, identifying information of a victim.
WarClandestine
Posted - March 3, 2025 at 8:50 PM
Saved - March 4, 2025 at 12:09 AM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Wow… Trump is not playing games. Trump says he believes Russia and the People of Ukraine are willing to make a deal, but that Zelensky is not. Trump warns Zelensky that he “won’t be around very long” if he is not willing to make a peace deal. 🔥Scorched-earth on Zelensky🔥 https://t.co/mH2RMWrKps

Video Transcript AI Summary
To solve the ongoing conflict, everyone needs to come together and quickly make a deal. It shouldn't be a difficult agreement to reach, and it can be done fast. If someone is unwilling to make a deal, they won't last long or be taken seriously. I believe Russia wants to make a deal. The people of Ukraine, who have suffered the most, certainly want a deal.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everybody has to get into a room, so to speak, and we have to make a deal. And the deal can be made very fast. It should not be that hard a deal to make. It could be made very fast. Now maybe somebody doesn't wanna make a deal. And if somebody doesn't wanna make a deal, I think that person won't be around very long. That person will not be listened to very long, because I believe that Russia wants to make a deal. I believe, certainly, the people of Ukraine wanna make a deal. They've suffered more than anybody else.
WarClandestine
Posted - March 2, 2025 at 9:15 PM
Saved - March 3, 2025 at 11:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that if you think Russia initiated the conflict in 2022, you might be misinformed. Understanding Victoria Nuland's role in Ukraine in 2014 is crucial. The Deep State, particularly the Obama administration, funded militant groups to instigate a civil war and orchestrated regime change. After the 2014 coup, the US effectively controlled Ukraine, using it for various covert operations. The buildup of Ukraine's military was aimed at confronting Russia, and the mainstream media has consistently misrepresented the truth about this situation.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

If you still believe that Russia started this conflict in 2022, then you are either corrupt, ignorant, or brainwashed. If you don’t know who Victoria Nuland is, or what she was doing in Ukraine in 2014, then you have no idea what’s going on. The Deep State started this war. It was the Obama CIA/State Dept that funded Nazi militant groups to start a civil war in Ukraine, and initiated regime change to a CIA/State Dept puppet, Yatseniuk. This was all revealed in the leaked phone call between State Dept diplomats and Deep State agents, Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt (link in next post). After the Maidan coup in February 2014, the US CIA/State Dept owned Ukraine via proxy, and the CIA began using Ukraine as a giant offshore playground for criminal racketeering and money laundering. Ukraine became one giant CIA base, directly on Russia’s border. Then the US/NATO began building up Ukraine’s army for the sole purpose of one day fighting Russia. The US/NATO began supplying Ukraine with weapons, equipment, missiles, training, intelligence, etc. Covert elements within the US government, along with their European partners in NATO, used espionage to overthrow and take control of the nation of Ukraine, then built a massive standing army on Russia’s border, then tried to bring Ukraine into NATO, and thus start WW3. If you are still buying the official MSM narrative about this conflict, you should not be engaged in conversations. Everything the MSM told you about Ukraine/Russia has been a lie, and in many cases, the inverse of the truth.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Link to BBC article from 2014 admitting the massive scandal at the US State Dept engaging in regime change. The MSM always leave these details out of the current narrative. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26072281.amp

Ukraine crisis: Leaked phone call embarrasses US - BBC News An apparently bugged call between US diplomats reveals a frank exchange on the strategy for Ukraine and disparaging comments about the EU. bbc.com
WarClandestine
Posted - February 28, 2025 at 5:42 PM
Saved - February 28, 2025 at 7:08 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

HOLY SHIT 👀 Trump, Vance, and Zelensky get in heated exchange and are yelling at each other in the White House! Trump has to remind Zelensky that the only reason he is still alive, is because of our funding and weapons. MUST WATCH! https://t.co/NBrFIsVbvk

WarClandestine
Posted - February 27, 2025 at 8:05 PM
Saved - February 27, 2025 at 9:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
It’s happening! AG Bondi has ordered the FBI to deliver the complete Epstein files by 8:00 AM tomorrow, which includes various documents and media. She assures that public disclosure will occur while protecting victims' privacy. This is just the start, with more phases to come. Bondi is being transparent about the process, and despite potential resistance from the Deep State, Trump’s appointees are committed to ensuring transparency for the American people. Everyone just needs to stay calm as we move forward.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

🔥It’s happening!🔥 AG Bondi just ordered the FBI to deliver the “full and complete Epstein files”, which includes documents, audio, video, etc., to her desk by 8:00 AM tomorrow. She also confirms that public disclosure will be happening, but that they will make sure to protect the privacy of the victims. In other words, we will eventually be getting everything, Trump’s appointees are working diligently to get the job done, and everyone just needs to relax. Whatever we get in “Phase 1” is just the beginning, and more will be coming, hence the usage of “phases”. Bondi is being extremely transparent and letting us know what’s going on, and the process of public disclosure is underway! Yes the Deep State will resist, but Trump and his appointees are actively working on achieving “transparency for the American People”.

WarClandestine
Posted - February 13, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 9:38 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Wow… Trump just accused Biden of starting the war in Ukraine! 👀 For decades, Russia have been clear that NATO membership for Ukraine was a hard red line, yet Biden pushed for membership anyways, provoking Russia. The Deep State are responsible for this war, not Russia. https://t.co/LEoTDON7z1

Video Transcript AI Summary
I predicted yesterday's events accurately. I don't believe Russia would ever allow Ukraine to join NATO, regardless of who is in power. I believe the war began because Biden stated Ukraine could join NATO, which he shouldn't have done. I knew then that war was inevitable, and I was right. This war is Biden's fault, not Putin's. Biden is incompetent, and saying Ukraine could join NATO was foolish. His comment about a "minor incursion" being acceptable was also a mistake.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yesterday were pretty accurate. I don't see any way that a country in Russia's position could allow them just in their position could allow them to join NATO. I don't see that happening. And long before president Putin, Russia was very strong in the fact that I believe that's the reason the war started because Biden went out and said that they could join NATO and he shouldn't have said that. As soon as he said that, I said, you know what? You're gonna have a war now. And I was right about that. That this is a war that would have never happened if our president Can you look at President Biden's fault, not President Putin? I mean, he's I think Biden is incompetent. And I think when he said that, they could join NATO, I thought that was was a very stupid thing to say. I thought when he said, well, it depends if it's a minor incursion. In other words, it's okay if Russia does a minor incursion. I thought that was a very foolish thing to say.
WarClandestine
Posted - February 12, 2025 at 11:32 PM
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 12:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe it! Joe is diving into some serious territory by flirting with the idea that COVID-19 was intentionally released. He asked Mike Benz about the "darkest of all conspiracy theories," and Benz hinted that the US might have funded the creation of the pathogen and the media campaign to cover it up. He left it open for us to draw our own conclusions. Joe is definitely getting into my area of interest!

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

🔥HOLY SHIT🔥 Joe is starting to flirt with the big secret! Joe asks Mike Benz how he feels about the “darkest of all conspiracy theories”, that C19 was released intentionally! After indirectly discussing USAID Project PREDICT, Benz essentially says that the US funded the creation of the pathogen, and funded the global media propaganda campaign to cover up the fact that it was man-made, and that we are welcome to draw our own conclusions based on this information. Joe is starting to creep dangerously close to my wheelhouse. 👀

Video Transcript AI Summary
The darkest theory is that the pandemic leak was intentional, a planned financial windfall and the greatest wealth transfer from the working class to the elite. We know it was created in a lab, funded by USAID, and that Fauci lied about gain of function research. The question is, was its release on purpose? It's a dark scenario, like Pearl Harbor, the Northwoods memo, the Gulf of Tonkin, or the Iraq War. Did they make it happen, or did they let it happen? Were we duped, or did we know the truth but found it useful? Many have similar thoughts about 9/11. I stay focused on what they did to create and cover it up and let others draw their own conclusions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the darkest of conspiracy theories. The darkest of conspiracy theories was that the leak was intentional. The darkest of conspiracy theories is that this was planned. They knew this is gonna be a financial windfall. It is the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of The United States by far from the working class to the elite. It's like 3 plus, what, trillion dollars or something crazy like that? Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: We've already established that it was created in a lab. We already established that USAID funded it. We already established that Fauci et al lied about gain of function research, what they were doing. The worst theory possible is that this was released on purpose. Yeah. Speaker 1: That would be the worst case scenario. Speaker 0: Yeah. Have you ever danced that one around your head? Because that's that's where you we know they're willing to do horrible evil shit. But, like, is there a ceiling on that? Speaker 1: Even now to this day, having spent so much of my life in it, I try I try to just pursue the leads that I have and then try to let the conclusions come to me. Certainly, the fact that they funded the capacity to do this, they work directly with all the networks that were both doing it and censoring it, is puts you pretty much as, you know, they created it and they covered up at least the leak. In terms of the the intentionality for doing it, that is a really dark scenario. You know, there there are a lot of things in American history, that that have that same, you know, mihalyha distinction. You know? Do they do they make it happen or do they let it do they let it happen or do they make it happen? And both of them are major scandals that completely change the the the legitimacy and credibility of policy changes in response to the crisis, for example. Like, you know, take something like Pearl Harbor. Right? It's been declassified now, the McCullough memo, the the eight action plan. Are you are you familiar with this? The Yeah. Yeah. I'm right. You know, and this was, you know, written before the the the bombing, and it was eight ways to get Japan to attack us because, you know, we don't have diplomatic cover to declare war on them. But if if if we get them to attack us and we can then spiral that into a war predicate I mean, the the same thing, for example, with the, you know, the Northwoods memo with, you know, pretext to war with Cuba and cooking up all these, you know, hijacking our own planes, sinking our own ships, doing, you know, riots on the streets of Miami and then saying that it was, you know, the Cuban government behind it. Same thing with Vietnam, Gulf Of Tonkin, you know, same thing with, you know, with the the weapons of mass destruction, predicate for invading Iraq. Did did we know that that you know, did did we were we duped and the crime was negligence for letting our national security state believe the New York Times reporting on, you know, on chem chemical, you know, and and biological and weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, or did we make that happen? Did we did did you know, was that was that something that we knew was not true based on our own intelligence but because there was a useful thing there? And, you know, a lot of people have the same thoughts about issues around around nine eleven and any number of of crisis events. And I I suppose I have my own thoughts on it. They're not fully settled. And because they are beyond the evidence I currently have, I I I stay in the zone of this is what they did to create it, this is what they did to cover it up. Here are the stars in the sky, draw your own constellation from there. Speaker 0: That's a good way to put it. Okay.
WarClandestine
Posted - February 4, 2025 at 4:52 AM
Saved - February 4, 2025 at 3:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m still in shock over the revelation that Trump’s top advisor claimed the US government funded the creation of COVID-19, which has led to millions of deaths worldwide. Shouldn’t this be a wake-up call for everyone? It’s surprising how many misinterpreted the situation. While many of us suspected COVID was man-made, there’s a significant difference between our speculation and an official statement from someone conducting an audit of USAID. This distinction is crucial.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

I’m still in shock. Trump’s top advisor, and most influential man on the planet, just told the world the US government funded the creation of C19 and are responsible for the deaths of millions worldwide. Shouldn’t the world be stopping? Is this not the biggest news in history? https://t.co/hHE7Ytxiqi

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

It’s amazing how many of you misinterpreted this. Yeah, no shit we all knew it was man-made. But there’s a massive difference between us saying that Covid was man-made by the USG, and the guy currently conducting the audit of the USAID, saying Covid was man-made by the USG.

WarClandestine
Posted - February 4, 2025 at 3:10 AM
Saved - February 4, 2025 at 2:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe it's crucial to discuss USAID's Project PREDICT, which started in 2009 to prevent zoonotic pandemics by studying and enhancing pathogens. This project involved significant players, including Metabiota, linked to Hunter Biden. After 2014, Metabiota began operations in Ukraine, focusing on bat coronaviruses. I find it alarming that a virologist with ties to influential families received substantial funding just before the COVID-19 pandemic emerged. This raises serious questions about accountability and transparency regarding the origins of the virus.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

1) Now that the world is keen to the USAID, it’s time to go over the big secret they are desperate to keep from the public. ⚠️Project PREDICT⚠️ This is the USAID-funded project that led to the creation of SARS-CoV-2 and the Covid pandemic. This is what Elon was alluding to.🧵 https://t.co/3GFym1ipON

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

2) USAID Project PREDICT began in 2009, was carried out in 30 countries around the globe, and was supposed to be a means to preemptively stop pandemics from zoonotic diseases jumping from animal to human. The concept was to artificially induce evolution, or enhance the functions of, naturally existing pathogens like Bird Flu and bat Coronaviruses, study them, and have vaccines prepared should one of these viruses mutate in the wild and jump to humans. The problem with this system is, that in order to preemptively create these vaccines and study these pathogens, scientists essentially have to create a bioweapon in the lab, by making these pathogens infectious to humans. Also known as “gain of function” or “directed evolution”. The project’s “Core Implementing Partners” are: -USAID -EcoHealth Alliance -UC Davis -Metabiota (Hunter Biden) -Wildlife Conservation Society -Smithsonian Institution

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

3) One of the partner organizations that received funding to carry out this project, Metabiota, a biolab company, was funded by none other than Hunter Biden’s Rosemont Seneca. The Owner, CEO, and head virologist behind Metabiota, is Nathan Wolfe, who, in addition to the Bidens, is financially tied to the Clintons, AND Epstein accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, via project TerraMar. Wolfe calls himself “Virus Hunter”@virushunter and wrote the book “The Viral Storm: The Dawn of a New Pandemic Age” (2011), which he predicted that the future would be fraught with pandemics, and the only way to prevent it is to give him millions of dollars to look for zoonotic diseases to produce vaccines. Nathan Wolfe is a REALLY deep rabbit hole, search my prior posts about Wolfe if you are interested in more information.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

4) But everything changed in 2014. After the Obama CIA/State Dept. took over Ukraine via color revolution, Metabiota were awarded their USAID/DoD contracts to begin searching for bat coronaviruses and operating labs in Ukraine via project PREDICT. All of this is open source information required by law, and is available on USA Spending government page.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

5) So what does this all mean? It means that a Clinton, Epstein, and Biden-affiliated virologist, was given tens of million of US tax dollars via USAID, to look for and genetically enhance bat coronaviruses in Ukraine, right before a man-made bat coronavirus started a global pandemic and killed millions of people. Seems pretty suspicious, no? And we have emails from Hunter’s laptop, proving that Hunter was in extremely close contact with Nathan Wolfe and Metabiota. None of this is conjecture, and is backed up via paper trail.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

6) So that’s the big secret. The ruling families of the DNC are financially involved in USAID (CIA) projects that were enhancing bat coronaviruses before the C19 pandemic, and they went great lengths to cover this up. This is ultimately where the road ends. The Deep State created C19 with US taxpayer dollars, and they are guilty of crimes against humanity. That’s why Fauci and the NIH covered up that Covid was man-made. That’s why the Dems/MSM censored/smeared anyone who talked about C19 being man-made. Thats why the Biden regime sent hundreds of billions to Ukraine. That’s why Hunter and Fauci’s pardons begin in 2014. That’s why the Dems are panicking that Trump is auditing the USAID. Because they are implicated in crimes against humanity, and Trump/Elon now have the paper trail to prove it.

WarClandestine
Posted - January 29, 2025 at 8:05 PM
Saved - January 30, 2025 at 4:28 AM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

🔥HOLY SHIT🔥 Trump says he is signing an EO to instruct DoD and DHS to prepare Guantanamo to house the “worst of the worst” illegal aliens! Trump invested hundreds of millions into GITMO in his first term, and already has 30,000 beds waiting. This was his plan all along. https://t.co/KtEhlBBYZh

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am signing an executive order directing the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security to prepare a 30,000-person migrant facility at Guantanamo Bay. This facility has the capacity to detain serious criminal illegal aliens who pose a threat to the American people. Some of these individuals are so dangerous that we cannot trust their home countries to hold them, as we want to prevent them from returning. Therefore, we will be sending them to Guantanamo.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, I'm also signing an executive order to instruct the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security to begin preparing the 30,000 person migrant facility at Guantanamo Bay. Most people don't even know about it. We have, 30,000 beds in Guantanamo to detain the worst criminal illegal aliens threatening the American people. Some of them are so bad, we don't even trust the countries to hold them because we don't want them coming back. So we're gonna send them out to Guantanamo.
WarClandestine
Posted - December 17, 2024 at 11:03 PM
Saved - December 19, 2024 at 4:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently learned about the assassination of Igor Kirillov, who had been vocal about how the US and Big Pharma manipulate global health crises for profit. In August 2023, he presented evidence to the UN, which was consistently vetoed by the US, revealing a paper trail that implicated the US government and various entities in the creation of COVID-19. Kirillov aimed to expose what he called the biggest crime in human history, which ultimately led to his death.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

If you were curious why Igor Kirillov was just assassinated, watch this video. In August 2023, Kirillov outlined how the US and Big Pharma “rule the world” by “manufacturing biological crises”. He also discussed how all of this evidence has been submitted to the UN many times, and gets vetoed every time by the US, because the US cannot refute the documentation. Essentially, Kirillov found the paper trail proving that the US government, along with NGOs and oligarchs, created C19, and used it to generate trillions in profit for pharmaceutical companies via vaccine production, as well as advancing government overreach via emergency powers. This is the reason they just killed him. He was trying to expose the biggest crime in human history.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Рост заболеваемости нехарактерными инфекциями наблюдается в ряде стран, и это может быть связано с действиями американских биологов. Ущерб от COVID-19 за два года значительно превышает последствия Второй мировой войны, что делает фармацевтические компании выгодоприобретателями. Мы передали более 2000 страниц документов в ООН, но США не опровергли эти данные. Ответы стандартные: все делается в интересах национальной безопасности, и нам предлагают слепо доверять. Соединенные Штаты используют кризисы биологического характера для глобального контроля, и даже помощь другим странам не так безвозмездна, как утверждается. --- The rise in atypical infections is noted in several countries, possibly linked to actions by American biologists. The damage from COVID-19 over two years far exceeds the consequences of World War II, making pharmaceutical companies beneficiaries. We submitted over 2000 pages of documents to the UN, but the US has not refuted this information. The responses are standard: everything is done in the interest of national security, and we are urged to trust blindly. The United States uses biological crises for global control, and even aid to other countries is not as free as claimed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Рост заболеваемости не характерными инфекциями отмечен в данный момент в ряде стран. Тоже мы можем говорить о том, что это не без помощи американских биологов? Speaker 1: Я думаю, что вот так огульно заявлять, мы же все-таки должностные лица. Ведь биологическое оружие, если посчитать какой ущерб нанес ковид, то наверное за два года. Speaker 0: Но основная такая пандемия два года Speaker 1: шла? Даже ее нельзя сравнить с ущербом который был во Вторую Мировую войну. Это в десятки раз больше. Зато выгодоприобретатели той же Биг Фармы Вы Speaker 0: имеете ввиду фармацевтические компании? Компаниям, которые в основном Speaker 1: находятся у нас там. Все дело в Штатах это там колоссальные. -То есть вопрос? Вопрос стоит. Вопросы мы задаем, мы же передаем документы. Вот характерна реакция Соединенных Штатов Америки, про которую мы говорим. Ни одного опровержения тем документам, которые мы предъявили, не было. Мы передали документы, это более, наверное, 2000 листов в Организацию Объединенных Наций. Speaker 0: Какой ответ пришел? Speaker 1: У нас, как правило, два ответа. Один ответ происходит в США. У них же он стандартный. Все, что ни делается, все делается в интересах национальной безопасности США. И нам надо доверять. Speaker 0: -Слепо доверять. Speaker 1: -Да, слепо доверять. Там политика глобального биологического контроля. Они поняли, что это работает, что посредством искусственно создаваемых таких кризисных ситуаций биологического характера можно управлять миром. Ведь ничего бесплатно они не делают и даже поставляя каким-то государствам на безвозмездной основе она не такая безвозмездная как они об этом говорят
WarClandestine
Posted - December 18, 2024 at 9:29 PM
Saved - December 19, 2024 at 1:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reflecting on a shocking claim from May 2023, when General Kirillov stated that Russia obtained deadly Avian Influenza samples from a US lab in Kherson, which could jump species and had a 40% human kill rate. Now, with his assassination and the CDC reporting human cases, I see too many connections to dismiss.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Ready to have your mind blown? Flashback to May 2023. General Kirillov claimed Russia MIL obtained samples of deadly Avian Influenza, also known as BIRD FLU, from a conquered US DoD lab in the Kherson region, that could jump species, with a 40% kill rate in humans… Coincidence that Kirillov was just assassinated, and now CDC reports that Bird Flu is jumping to humans and causing states of emergencies? Too many connecting dots to be a coincidence.

WarClandestine
Posted - December 18, 2024 at 3:50 AM
Saved - December 18, 2024 at 11:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe there are significant reasons behind the substantial financial aid to Ukraine and the impeachment of Trump over a phone call related to it. Hunter Biden's connections to biolabs in Ukraine, particularly with Metabiota, raise questions, especially since the story faced censorship from Big Tech and mainstream media. The resistance against figures like Tulsi and RFK Jr. for discussing these biolabs is notable. The recent assassination of a Russian official investigating these matters adds to my concerns about the Deep State's willingness to escalate tensions rather than allow Ukraine to surrender, suggesting a cover-up of their actions.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

There’s a reason hundreds of billions of our tax dollars are in Ukraine. There’s a reason the Dems impeached Trump over a phone call to Ukraine. There’s a reason Hunter’s pardon starts in 2014, right before his biolab company Metabiota got their contract with the DoD to begin studying bat coronaviruses in Ukraine. There’s a reason Big Tech censored the story and the MSM said there were no biolabs in Ukraine. There’s a reason the establishment/MSM apply so much resistance towards Tulsi and RFK Jr., after they made comments about the biolabs in Ukraine. There’s a reason that the CIA/Ukraine just assassinated the Russian Military official leading the investigation into the biolabs in Ukraine. There’s a reason the Deep State are willing to start nuclear war before they let Ukraine surrender. Everything we are seeing is a result of the Deep State trying to cover up their criminality in Ukraine. It’s as simple as that.

WarClandestine
Posted - December 2, 2024 at 7:45 PM
Saved - December 3, 2024 at 3:13 AM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Eyes on! 👀 Disgraced former FBI agent, Andrew McCabe, is concerned that “conspiracy theories” might arise from Hunter’s pardon beginning in 2014. The rats are panicking! They DESPERATELY don’t want you to know this is about UKRAINE! https://t.co/M41E6zZJxp

Video Transcript AI Summary
Republicans, including Indiana Senator Jim Banks, are highlighting a specific timeframe regarding Joe Biden's pardon for Hunter Biden, particularly noting that it extends back to 2014, the year Hunter joined Burisma's board. This broad timeframe may fuel ongoing accusations against Hunter, suggesting he must have committed crimes to warrant such a pardon. Biden's statement indicates that the charges against Hunter arose from political pressure from his opponents, and a plea deal fell apart due to disagreements over potential future charges. While some argue Hunter was treated differently than others in similar situations, the lengthy investigation and limited charges suggest a narrative of unfair persecution, which the president seems to support, linking it to his own political standing.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Republicans are really seizing on the time frame here, right, including the senator elect from Indiana, Jim Banks, who said Joe Biden issued a pardon to Hunter Biden for any crimes that he might have committed since 2014. Why such a specific year? Well, Hunter Biden just so happened to join the board of Burisma, Ukrainian Energy Firm, in that same year, 2014, so corrupt. What do you make of the time frame here? Speaker 1: Well, I mean, my initial impression was this is, the president's desire to protect him for the longest period that reflects the president's time of service in the White House. But nevertheless, the effect of that very broad 10 year time frame is ironically, it will perpetuate the accusations around Hunter Biden. They'll never be resolved criminally, but it gives his detractors the opportunity to say, oh, well, he must have done something in 2014 to require a pardon going back that far. I'm curious about a specific portion of, the part in the the text of what the president put out. He writes, quote, the charges in Hunter's cases came about only after several of my political opponents in congress instigated them to attack me and oppose my election. Then a carefully negotiated plea deal agreed to by the Department of Justice unraveled in the courtroom with a number of my political opponents in congress taking credit for bringing political pressure on the process. Had the plea deal held, it would have been a fair, reasonable resolution of Hunter's cases. Part of the reason it fell apart though had to do with the disagreement between Hunter's attorneys and the judge over whether other potential charges against Hunter could be processed in the future. Right? So how much stock do you put into this rationale? It's really hard. That's really hard to say. I think that it definitely has the impact of generating more of that sort of speculation. Right? The range of the pardon, the depth of going all the way back to 2014. However, there are reasonable arguments that could be made to say that Hunter Biden was treated differently than other people who are engaged in similar criminal conduct and who would likely have not been prosecuted to this extent of the law. Hunter Biden endured a, what, 5 year investigation in which these are the only charges that came out of it. So I think this narrative that he was a subject of some sort of unfair persecution, there is some facts to back that up. It's clear that the president believes that's what's going on here, and that most of it was generated targeted towards, Hunter because of president Biden's role in the White House.
WarClandestine
Posted - November 21, 2024 at 7:42 PM
Saved - November 22, 2024 at 4:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Putin has unveiled a new Russian ICBM that NATO defense systems can't intercept, but he chose not to attach nuclear payloads. This move serves as a warning to the West, demonstrating his capability to retaliate if provoked. Despite this significant development, it hasn't received the media attention it deserves, possibly because it contradicts the narrative of Putin as an uncontrollable aggressor. He seems to prefer diplomacy over nuclear conflict, yet the West continues to challenge him. I believe we need Trump back in office immediately.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

By the looks of it, Putin whipped out a new Russian ICBM that NATO defense systems cannot intercept, but did NOT attach nuclear payloads to them. Essentially, Putin just showed the West that he has the ability to destroy them if they keep provoking him. It was a warning. Putin just exercised extreme restraint, while also showing Ukraine/NATO that they are outgunned. This should be front page news on every outlet, but for some reason, it’s not. Perhaps it’s because this situation does not fit their narrative that Putin is this Hitler-esque loose-cannon who wants to conquer the world. Putin is showing restraint. He wants diplomacy, not nuclear war. But the West continue to poke the bear. We cannot wait until January 20th. We need Trump in office right now.

WarClandestine
Posted - November 13, 2024 at 10:18 PM
Saved - November 15, 2024 at 7:25 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Oddly enough, Trump’s new DNI, Tulsi Gabbard, is also deeply intertwined in the US-funded biolabs in Ukraine saga. She was the only big-name politician to speak out about the labs after Victoria Nuland spilled the beans, and took A LOT of backlash for it. Tulsi knows. 👀 https://t.co/VaojGuQGji

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are 25 to 30 US-funded biolabs in Ukraine conducting research on dangerous pathogens in an active war zone. The risk of these labs being compromised is high, which could lead to the spread of deadly pathogens across Europe and the world. To protect global health, these labs should be shut down immediately, and their pathogens destroyed. The Biden administration should collaborate with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, and the UN to establish a ceasefire around these facilities until they are secured. Additionally, the US funds around 300 biolabs worldwide engaged in similar risky research. Given the potential dangers, these labs should have been closed two years ago. This issue transcends partisan politics; immediate action is necessary for the safety of all people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here are the undeniable facts. There are 25 to 30 US funded biolabs in Ukraine. According to the US government, these biolabs are conducting research on dangerous pathogens. Ukraine is in an active war zone with widespread bombing, artillery, and shelling, and these facilities, even in the best of circumstances, could easily be compromised and release these deadly pathogens. Now, like COVID, these pathogens know no borders. If they are inadvertently or purposely breached or compromised, they will quickly spread all throughout Europe, the United States, and the rest of the world, causing untold suffering and death. So in order to protect the American people, the people of Europe, the people around the world, these labs need to be shut down immediately, and the pathogens that they hold need to be destroyed. Instead of trying to cover this up, the Biden Harris administration needs to work with Russia, Ukraine, NATO, the UN to immediately implement a ceasefire for all military action in the vicinity of these labs until they're secured and these pathogens are destroyed. Now in addition to all this, the US funds around 300 biolabs around the world who are engaging in dangerous research, including gain of function, similar to the lab in Wuhan where COVID 19 may have originated from. Now after realizing how dangerous and vulnerable these labs are, they should have all been shut down 2 years ago, but they haven't. Now this is not a partisan political issue. The administration and congress need to act now for the health and well-being of every American and every person on this planet.
WarClandestine
Posted - November 13, 2024 at 3:29 PM
Saved - November 13, 2024 at 4:21 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Adorable. Schumer is begging Republicans take it easy on them, now that Trump won the election and has majorities in both chambers. He unironically warns Republicans not to “go to the extreme”. After the Dems just waged political warfare for 8 years… https://t.co/gvgf5xQmae

Video Transcript AI Summary
To my Republican colleagues, I urge caution in interpreting the election results. Avoid the temptation to veer towards extremes, as this has historically backfired on the party in power. Our effectiveness relies on bipartisanship. If we want the next four years to be as productive as the last, cooperation is essential. Democrats are committed to working with both sides when opportunities arise, without compromising our values. The key question is whether Republicans will embrace the same approach. Do not forsake bipartisanship; it remains the most effective way to achieve our goals, just as it has in the past.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now let me turn to my colleagues on the other side of the aisle. Another closely contested election now comes to an end. To my Republican colleagues, I offer a word of caution in good faith. Take care not to misread the will of the people, and do not abandon the need for bipartisanship. After winning an election, the temptation may be to go to the extreme. We've seen that happen over the decades, and it's consistently backfired on the party in power. So instead of going to the extremes, I remind my colleagues that this body is most effective when it's bipartisan. If we want in the next 4 years the senate to be product as productive as the last 4, the only way that will happen is through bipartisan cooperation. Democrats will be ready to do what we have consistently done, work with both sides when the opportunity arises. Democrats will never abandon our values, but neither will we reject an opportunity to move the ball forward to make people's lives better when we can. The question is now whether or not Republicans are willing to do the same. To my colleagues on the other side, once again, do not abandon bipartisanship. It's the best and most effective way to get things done. It was true in the last 4 years and will be true in the years to come.
WarClandestine
Posted - October 14, 2024 at 5:13 PM
Saved - October 14, 2024 at 8:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by what I saw on 60 Minutes, which took us inside a Philadelphia voting center. Election officials stated it takes four days to count mail-in ballots due to the process of removing them from envelopes and unfolding them. It feels like they think we’re naive. This episode seems designed to prepare us for potential delays in the election, suggesting a plan to manipulate the outcome by transporting ballots to heavily Democratic areas in Pennsylvania. It feels like they’re openly revealing their strategy to influence the election.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

⚠️ALERT⚠️ They are telegraphing their plan to steal PA! 60 Minutes takes us inside a Philadelphia voting center, where election officials claim it takes 4 days to count mail-in ballots, because they have to take them out the envelope… and unfold it… They think we are stupid. The entire episode from 60 Minutes is textbook predictive programming, trying to pre bunk any future allegations, and normalize the public to expect delays in the election. Why? Because they intend to cheat. They intend to delay the election, so they can traffic ballots to deep blue districts in PA, namely Philadelphia, and then steal the most important state in this election, which will like decide the presidency. They are revealing their entire scheme.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2020, Pennsylvania took 4 days to call the election because half the voters voted by mail, and counting mail-in ballots takes time. Each ballot arrives in two envelopes, and processing cannot start until 7 AM on election day. According to elections administrator Karen Barsoum, dealing with 100,000 mail-in ballots means handling double the amount of envelopes, which is a long process. After opening the envelopes, a different team unfolds the ballots to remove creases. Processing each ballot takes several minutes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in 2020, it took 4 days to call the election in Pennsylvania. What took so long? Speaker 1: When you have half of your voters vote by mail, like we did in 2020, counting those votes takes time. Speaker 2: We saw for ourselves at a ballot intake center in Chester County outside Philadelphia. Speaker 1: So this is the actual envelope, and this is where the ballots are returned in? And this is a sample. Correct. Yes. Speaker 2: Elections administrator Karen Barsoum showed us how each ballot arrives inside 2 different envelopes. Speaker 1: 94 ballots in one tray. Speaker 2: Processing them is a tedious task, which under Pennsylvania law cannot start until 7 AM on election day. Speaker 1: So when we do open it, there is another envelope. So hypothetically speaking, if we have a 100,000 mail in ballots, we have to deal with double the amount of envelopes, which is a long process. And then, the ballast comes out. And you can't count it folded like that. Correct. We will need to have a whole different team unfold them, back fold them to get the creases out as good as we can. How long does it take to process each ballot? Several minutes. It's not it's not, like, done in a sec.
WarClandestine
Posted - September 24, 2024 at 6:17 PM
Saved - September 24, 2024 at 7:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the public will eventually realize that blackmail is a key mechanism in how the world is governed. Many in the ruling class are manipulated by powerful figures through blackmail, a tactic that has persisted for decades. Politicians, celebrities, and other influential individuals are often targeted by intelligence entities seeking control. This honeypot strategy allows bad actors to influence policy without ever needing to win an election. In my view, this reveals that democracy is more of a fairy tale than a reality.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Eventually, the public are going to learn that the world is run on blackmail. Much of the ruling class are controlled by nefarious actors, by means of blackmail. Diddy and Epstein are just two of many such operations. This practice has been going on for decades. Politicians, celebrities, athletes, musicians, actors, anyone with a high level of influence or power; all of them were a target for nefarious intelligence entities, seeking to gain control. With this method of honeypot and blackmail, bad actors can rule from the shadows, without having to win a single election. If they have dirt on all of the politicians, they control the policy decisions via proxy. This is how the world operates. Democracy is a fairy tale.

WarClandestine
Posted - September 23, 2024 at 4:47 PM
Saved - September 23, 2024 at 4:54 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

The Biden regime just went full-Gestapo. They are advertising a bounty on Trump’s head, put out by Trump’s would-be assassin, who is an intelligence asset/patsy. Our own government is trying to kill the People’s preferred candidate and frontrunner for POTUS. Wake the fuck up. https://t.co/M8khHuK2RZ

WarClandestine
Posted - September 18, 2024 at 12:39 AM
Saved - September 18, 2024 at 3:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Diddy was involved in a honeypot and blackmail operation similar to Epstein's. It raises questions about who he was working for and whether the CIA was aware of his activities. Given his strong ties to the Democrat Party, it seems clear where his loyalties lie. I see him as an intelligence asset who traded his integrity for fame and wealth, serving the Deep State's interests. It's important to recognize that he has been used by the Democrats to influence Hollywood and the music industry since the early 2000s.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

For those who don’t know, Diddy was running a honeypot/blackmail operation, just like Epstein. The only question is, who was above Diddy? Who was he feeding the intelligence to? Given the CIA are neck deep in all these kinds of operations, it’s pretty safe to assume they knew. And given Diddy has been an extremely vocal and influential asset for the Democrat Party, it’s safe to say where his loyalty lies. Diddy was an intelligence asset, and his mission was to obtain blackmail for the Deep State, in exchange for fame and riches. Literally sold his soul to the devil. Don’t let the Democrats disassociate from Diddy. He is one of theirs. They have been using him to try and influence Hollywood and the music industry since at least the early 2000’s. He is a Democrat operative. Video: Diddy interviews Obama 2004

Video Transcript AI Summary
Barack Obama, then a US Senate candidate from Illinois, stated that his election would break a barrier, as there were no African Americans in the Senate at the time. He emphasized the importance of including African Americans, Latinos, and more women in the political process, as the Senate makes decisions about war, peace, and taxes. Obama agreed that his potential election was proof that the voting process can work if minorities and young people get involved. He stressed the importance of political participation, noting that young people should be involved in decisions about war and taxes, regardless of their profession, so that their interests are looked after.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From you, sir. Speaker 1: I'm Barack Obama. I'm the US senate candidate from the state of Illinois. Speaker 0: Okay. And, you becoming a a black democratic senator, this is a big deal. This is a big deal. Speaker 1: Well, absolutely. You know, we've got a 100 US senators, across from across the country, and right now, not one is African American. So part of what we hope to do is to break that barrier, make sure that African Americans, Latinos, more women, are included in the process because the US Senate makes decisions about a lot of stuff, war and peace, what we do with our tax dollars, etcetera. Speaker 0: The reason why I'm bringing up this is a big deal because it's proof that the voting process can work if if minorities and young people get involved. The disenfranchised that don't usually vote can make changes and and and can change the face of, of politics. Do you agree? Speaker 1: Absolutely. Listen, you know, you're a motivating force for young people all across the country. Your music moves people. You are you're a trendsetter. But what part of what we wanna do is to make sure that we're we're setting a trend in terms of political participation. You know, music, fashion, all that's important, but people have to also understand that, you know, when our young men and women go to war, somebody's made that decision, and it's typically gonna be young people. You know, whether you work at Mickey D's or you're producing records, your tax dollars are going somewhere. And young people have to be involved in that decision making process so that their interests are looked after.
WarClandestine
Posted - September 13, 2024 at 6:44 PM
Saved - September 13, 2024 at 7:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Ukraine operates as a CIA base, having been influenced since the Soviet Union's fall. The CIA's involvement began with the Nunn-Lugar Act in 1991, leading to the establishment of US-funded operations under the guise of foreign aid. The 2014 civil war was fueled by US support for certain groups, allowing the State Department to install pro-US leaders. Putin's response stems from a desire to prevent NATO's encroachment on Russia's borders. The narrative of an unprovoked Russian attack obscures the US's role in escalating the conflict, which I see as a continuation of Cold War dynamics.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

I do. Ukraine is essentially a giant CIA base, posing as a sovereign nation. The CIA moved into Ukraine after the fall of the Soviet Union, looking to take advantage of the lawless and destabilized country, using it as an offshore proxy, outside the scope of US oversight. It began with the Nunn-Lugar Act in 1991, and then carried on into 2005, when then Senators Obama and Lugar visited Ukraine, to inspect the former Soviet bio, chemical, and nuclear facilities (pictured below), and then added Ukraine to the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, and began turning these former Soviet facilities into “defensive research facilities”, which opened the door for US contractors to establish their foothold in Ukraine, and set up their money laundering and racketeering operations, under the guise of “foreign aid”. Then the CIA funded Nazi militant groups in Ukraine which led to the outbreak of civil war in 2014 in the Donbas. Amidst the chaos, the US State Department, via Victoria Nuland, leveraged the situation to install US-loyal puppets, including the infamous leaked phone call between her and fellow State Department bureaucrat Geoffrey Pyatt, about ensuring “their guy” Yatsenuik, was installed as Prime Minister. The State Department, in tandem with the CIA, covertly took control of Ukraine via Color Revolution in 2014. Putin recognized this. He knew that the US had destabilized and taken control of Ukraine, and recognized that the US were building a proxy army on his border, by funding, training, and supplying Ukraine with weapons, and trying to bring them into NATO. This was a red line for Putin, as he has said for decades. Russia have been invaded from the West too many times before, and will not tolerate a hostile standing army and long-range missiles on their border. Just like the US didn’t like it when Russia tried to put nukes in Cuba in the 60’s, Russia doesn’t like the US trying to bring armies and weapons to Ukraine. Essentially, Ukraine is an unofficial US territory and NATO member, and the Deep State do not want to lose out on their cash cow and strategic asset that is Ukraine, hence why they continue to send hundreds of billions of our tax dollars to protect Ukraine’s border. They are using Ukraine as a laundry mat to funnel in hundreds of billions for the war machine, and also covering up their extreme criminality in Ukraine, including crimes against humanity for bioweapon development, human trafficking, drug trafficking, etc. All the things they can’t get away with stateside, they do in Ukraine. If the public knew the truth about the origins of US involvement in Ukraine, they would NEVER have supported sending a single penny to Ukraine. The narrative that Russia attacked Ukraine in 2022 “unprovoked”, is war propaganda to make it appear Ukraine are the righteous defenders in order to garner your support, when in reality, The US started this conflict, they are the ones who brought war to Putin’s doorstep, and the US are the ones perpetuating the war by continuing to fund and supply Ukraine. Putin does not want to conquer all of Europe, he just wants NATO off of his border, and justice for US development of weapons of mass destruction in Ukraine, namely, gene-specific biological weapons. The Cold War never truly ended.

@EricRWeinstein - Eric Weinstein

I don’t understand what we are doing in Ukraine. And I don’t think you do either.

WarClandestine
Posted - September 6, 2024 at 10:08 PM
Saved - September 7, 2024 at 7:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it significant that Dick Cheney, a figure associated with the old GOP, has endorsed Kamala Harris. This highlights the shift in the Republican Party, where traditional figures like the Cheneys, Bushes, and Romneys have been sidelined by Trump and MAGA supporters. Their loyalty to the uniparty is evident, and Cheney's endorsement serves as a clear indication of the divide. It's ironic and amusing, considering Cheney was once a target of disdain before Trump's rise. This endorsement reinforces the notion of Trump and MAGA as the true opposition to the Deep State.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Warmongering neocon, Dick Cheney, endorses Kamala Harris. This is further confirmation that the old GOP is dead, and Trump has taken over the Republican Party. -The Cheneys -The Bushes -The McCains -Paul Ryan -Mitt Romney The old GOP establishment have been booted out of MAGA, and remain loyal to their uniparty cohorts on the other side of the aisle, hence why they all support Kamala. This proves that a Deep State/Uniparty exists, and confirms that Trump/MAGA are the opposition to this entity. Dick Cheney endorsing Kamala is a MASSIVE positive for Trump. And it’s also hilarious, because before Trump came along, Dick Cheney was arguably the guy they hated most. They don’t event realize what they have become.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dick Cheney will be voting for Kamala Harris.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dick Cheney, your father, a beloved figure among democrats, for many, many years. Do you, if you know who he will be supporting or who he'll be voting for, do you care to share with us who he might be voting for? Dick Cheney will be voting for Kamala Harris.
WarClandestine
Posted - March 18, 2024 at 5:40 PM
Saved - September 7, 2024 at 7:33 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

VERY interesting 👀 Obama meets for a private conversation with UK Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, in London. The Deep State are in panic mode. Putin just won his election, and Trump is projected to win as well. They have to act. Obama is scheming. Next hoax incoming… https://t.co/89P27UInG8

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks what the purpose of the visit is and then expresses gratitude. They then inquire if there is any advice from the prime minister.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What are you here to talk about? Hello? Thank you very much. Any advice from the prime minister?
WarClandestine
Posted - September 3, 2024 at 6:30 PM
Saved - September 3, 2024 at 9:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In February 2015, Trump discussed Bill Clinton's ties to Jeffrey Epstein during an interview, indicating his awareness of Epstein's activities. Shortly after taking office, Trump signed Executive Order 13773 to combat transnational criminal organizations, which contributed to Epstein's 2019 arrest for human trafficking. I believe Trump has made significant strides against human trafficking, yet the mainstream media and Democrats have largely ignored his efforts, labeling them as conspiracy theories. This ongoing struggle against human trafficking is intertwined with broader political battles.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

⚠️Trump/Epstein Shadow War⚠️ 1) Feb. 2015: Hannity interviews Trump at CPAC. Trump says Bill Clinton has “a lot of problems coming up with famous island, with Jeffery Epstein”. Trump knew, because he helped Epstein’s victims, which led to Epstein’s imprisonment in 2008. https://t.co/24usx7aYGq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Clinton is perceived to have impending issues related to Jeffrey Epstein's island.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bill Clinton. Nice guy. Got a lot of problems coming up, in my opinion, with the famous island with Jeffrey Epstein. A lot of problems.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

2) Then when Trump took office, just three weeks into his administration, he signed Executive Order 13773, targeting Transnational Criminal Organizations and Preventing International Trafficking. This EO was dedicated to destroying Epstein’s operation, and others like it. It was one of the first things Trump did as POTUS, and it eventually led to Epstein’s arrest in 2019, on federal charges of human trafficking.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

3) Trump has done more to combat human trafficking than anyone, and the Dems/MSM never once praised him for it, or even acknowledged it. They just ignored it, said it was a conspiracy theory, and demonized/censored anyone who talked about human trafficking and pedophilia. They said Sound of Freedom was kooky tinfoil hat stuff, and discouraged people from watching it, despite human trafficking being a real global humanitarian crisis. They refuse to acknowledge the humanitarian crisis at the border, and refuse to acknowledge how human traffickers have been abusing our open borders to monetize the trade of human sex slaves, and created one of the largest human trafficking corridors on Earth, through our southern border. This is one of the main reasons why they don’t want a wall and a secure border, because it will ruin their cash cow and flow of children, in addition to new voters. Once you see that the Dems/MSM have gone to every length to cover up this reality, and see that Trump has been trying to expose it, everything becomes clear. Trump has been gunning for Epstein and the global human trafficking operation since at least 2008, if not before, and the Deep State knew it, hence why they have deployed every single asset to stop Trump since he came down that escalator, and the war rages on to this day. Video from January 6th, 2019:

WarClandestine
Posted - September 3, 2024 at 5:12 PM
Saved - September 3, 2024 at 5:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just watched Trump’s conversation with Lex Fridman about the Epstein files. He mentioned that many influential people visited the island, but he wasn’t one of them. It’s clear why the Deep State fears him; he’s aware of their secrets and intends to reveal them.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

🔥MUST WATCH🔥 Trump speaks with Lex Fridman on declassifying the Epstein files! Trump says “A lot of big people went to that island, but fortunately, I was not one of them”. This is why the Deep State fear him. Because he knows their darkest secrets, and aims to expose them! This is why they have been throwing everything at him since he came down that escalator. Because they knew that he knew.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many prominent individuals visited the island, but the speaker was not among them. The speaker finds it strange that the list of clients who visited the island has not been made public, but believes it probably will be eventually. The speaker distinguishes the Kennedy situation from the Epstein case, noting the passage of time and potential dangers involved. The speaker would be inclined to address the Epstein situation and would have no problem doing so.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But a lot of big people went to that island. But, fortunately, I was not one of them. It's just very strange for a lot of people that, the list of clients that went to the island has not been made public. Yeah. It's it's very interesting, isn't it? Probably will be, by the way. Probably. So if you're able to, you'll be Yeah. I'd certainly take a look at it. Now Kennedy's interesting because it's so many years ago. You know? They do that for danger too because, you know, it endangers certain people, etcetera, etcetera. So Kennedy, is very different from the Epstein thing. But, yeah, I'd be inclined to do the Epstein. I'd have no problem with it.
WarClandestine
Posted - August 27, 2024 at 3:13 AM
Saved - August 27, 2024 at 2:26 PM

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

So Zuckerberg came out and admitted that the Biden/Harris regime were engaged in the unconstitutional policing of free speech on private platforms. This is also known as “fascism”. The Dems are who they claim to fight. All they do is project. Their accusations are confessions. https://t.co/bkuDQ84ILj

View Full Interactive Feed