TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @WorldByWolf

WorldByWolf
Posted - January 4, 2026 at 3:23 PM
Saved - January 4, 2026 at 10:13 PM

@WorldByWolf - Wolf 🐺

In a 2012 debate on BBC Question Time @TRobinsonNewEra asks @GoodwinMJ to define what “far-right” means. Goodwin says the “far-right” is anyone who undermines liberal democracy, pluralism, and rejects equality. No one should believes Goodwin’s sudden conversion is legitimate. https://t.co/2CZnZhgVMO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on what defines the far right. Speaker 1 identifies two key features that far-right groups share. First, they reject or undermine what representative liberal democracy is all about, a system that accepts that a plurality of views is legitimate and should be supported and allowed. Speaker 1 suggests that many viewers would feel that the organization’s campaign methods automatically discount the views of Muslims and the rights of Muslims to hold those views. Second, beyond variations in different groups, there is a shared ultimate rejection of human equality. Speaker 1 notes that while the organization may deny being the same as groups like the American Nazis, there is a recognition of considerable variation within those parties; nevertheless, the core characteristic they share is this rejection of equality. Speaker 0 pushes back by saying that the discussion has moved from militant Islam to a broader focus on Muslims, implying that the conversation has shifted from a discussion about extremism within Islam to Muslims in general. This leads to a clarification of the perceived issue: the organization’s approach is viewed as not merely critiquing militant Islam but targeting Muslims as a group. The exchange highlights a tension between describing far-right groups as advocating for a democracy that excludes or diminishes minority rights and acknowledging the internal diversity of far-right movements. It also raises a concern about how such groups are perceived by the public in terms of whether their campaigns are seen as denying Muslims the right to hold views or participate in the political process. The dialogue emphasizes two main points about far-right ideology: a fundamental challenge to liberal, pluralistic democracy and a fundamental rejection of human equality, with an added discussion about whether the scope of critique should be directed at militant expressions of Islam or Muslims as a whole.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're here talking about the far right. Can someone define far right to me, please? The old the old parts. Yeah. Can you define far the well, Matt's one of the experts on that very thing. Yeah. Speaker 1: There there are there are there are two key things that far right groups share. Okay? Firstly, they reject or they undermine what representative liberal democracy is all about. Now a liberal representative democracy accepts that a plurality of views is legitimate. We should support those views. We should allow those views, okay? And I think what many people would feel is that your organization and the way in which you you campaign is automatically discounting the views of Muslims and the rights of Muslims to hold those views. But secondly, what far right groups share? Mean, you I'm sure you would say you're not the same organization as, say, I don't know, the American Nazis. No. No. Right? Because there's a lot of variation within those parties. Hold on. Yeah. But what they also share ultimately is a rejection of human equality. And I I would guess that many people who are watching the show would feel that your organization is no longer talking about militant Islam. You're Speaker 0: just talking about Muslims.
WorldByWolf
Posted - January 3, 2026 at 11:08 AM
Saved - January 3, 2026 at 8:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Discussion centers on Venezuela’s economic/financial system and its social regime. One user notes bans on sexuality-related measures and usury. Others ask if interest is allowed; Grok says lending interest is allowed and capped by the Central Bank. A further query about ownership yields that the Banco Central de Venezuela is state-owned with no private stake; leadership is appointed by the president, unlike the Fed’s private involvement.

@WorldByWolf - Wolf 🐺

“Maduro, whatever his many faults, and I wouldn’t hire him as an economist, he has the most socially conservative country probably in the hemisphere … Venezuela has banned pornography, banned abortion, banned gay marriage, banned sex changes, and banned usury” https://t.co/ZIGfVyyYud

Video Transcript AI Summary
- Ben Shapiro, in an interview with Megan Kelly, referred to Maduro, the communist leader of Venezuela, and discussed defending Maduro in a way related to regime change; Megan Kelly notes Tucker Carlson said Maduro, despite faults, wouldn’t be hired as an economist. - Megan Kelly points out Tucker Carlson’s claim that Maduro is culturally conservative, and Shapiro responds: “Who gives a shit? The guy's a communist dictator. Everyone in his country is eating dog. He's shipping fentanyl to The United States to kill Americans. Why do I give a shit whether he's anti LGBTQ rights? Who gives a shit?” - The conversation shifts to Shapiro’s personal stance: “I do. I do. I'm not moving to Venezuela. Not pro Maduro, but I care about that. Why wouldn't I care about that? I've got kids.” He expresses a personal willingness to become poorer to end abortion in the United States, stating, “I would personally become poorer to end abortion, voluntarily become poorer to end abortion in The United States. That's not a choice. Don't wanna become poorer, but I would because I care about it.” - He further states his positions on issues like pornography and gender: “Maybe you don't, maybe you're offended that I do, but I care about it, lots of people care about it. I don't think pornography is good. That really hurts people. You know? I I don't think pretending that the sexes are the same is good, and you claim that you didn't think it was good, but it turns out, quote, I don't give a shit.” - The dialogue concludes with a blunt reference to Maduro’s foreign policy stance: “Maduro's against Israel. Oh, okay.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ben Shapiro was just sitting there being interviewed by Megan Kelly and said something he said something like, well, Tucker Carlson's, you know, for Maduro. Maduro, the communist leader of Venezuela who were, guess, were on the way to killing or something, forcing out regime changing him. And he defended Maduro. Didn't, actually. And Megan Kelly says, well, Tucker said in his show that Maduro, most people didn't know this, whatever his many faults, I wouldn't hire him as an economist. Okay? But whatever's many faults has the most socially conservative country probably in the hemisphere. So Venezuela is just a fact. I mean, I didn't make this up. I'm not in charge of Venezuela. Just noticing that Venezuela has banned pornography, banned abortion, banned gay marriage, banned sex changes, and banned usury. You don't have credit cards with 40% interest in Venezuela. Okay. Ben Shapiro responded this way. Speaker 1: Tucker's made the point I'm not gonna here to be Tucker's defender, but he's made the point that Maduro is culturally conservative. Who gives a shit? The guy's a communist dictator. Everyone in his country is eating dog. He's shipping fentanyl to The United States to kill Americans. Why do I give a shit whether he's whether he's anti LGBTQ rights? Who Speaker 0: gives a shit? I do. I do. I'm not moving to Venezuela. Not pro Maduro, but I care about that. Why wouldn't I care about that? I've got kids. Like, first of I'm against abortion. Sorry. Unpopular. I feel that way. I think it's really sad. I would personally become poorer to end abortion, voluntarily become poorer to end abortion in The United States. That's not a choice. Don't wanna become poorer, but I would because I care about it. Maybe you don't, maybe you're offended that I do, but I care about it, lots of people care about it. I don't think pornography is good. That really hurts people. You know? I I don't think pretending that the sexes are the same is good, and you claim that you didn't think it was good, but it turns out, quote, I don't give a shit. Maduro's against Israel. Oh, okay.

@captive_dreamer - captive dreamer

@WorldByWolf Hello @grok does Venezuela permit the charging of interest on loans?

@grok - Grok

@captive_dreamer @WorldByWolf Yes, Venezuela permits charging interest on loans, regulated by the Central Bank with caps (e.g., maximum nominal rates historically around 29% for banks, subject to adjustments). Usury laws prohibit excessive rates, but interest itself is allowed.

@Intifada4Life - Globalize the Intifada, 🇵🇸🇷🇺🇻🇪

@grok @captive_dreamer @WorldByWolf @grok - who owns Venezuela’s central bank? Is there any indirect private sector ownership, like there is with the Federal Reserve?

@grok - Grok

The Banco Central de Venezuela (BCV) is a public legal entity owned by the Venezuelan state, with no private sector ownership. Its capital is inalienable and fully state-controlled. Leadership is appointed by the President of the Republic. Unlike the Federal Reserve, where member banks hold stock, there is no indirect private involvement in the BCV.

WorldByWolf
Posted - January 1, 2026 at 12:30 PM
Saved - January 1, 2026 at 8:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue that a struggle between good and evil is intensified within the Jewish race, suggesting they may be producing a malevolent system rivaling Christianity. I speak of a world-wide Jewish conspiracy from Spartacus-Weishaupt to Marx, Trotsky, Bela Kun, Luxemburg, and Goldman, dominating Bolshevism and terror across Russia, Hungary, and Germany.

@WorldByWolf - Wolf 🐺

A 1920 article from Winston Churchill about international Jews: “The conflict between good and evil which proceeds unceasingly in the breast of man nowhere reaches such intensity as in the Jewish race. The dual nature of mankind is nowhere more strongly or more terribly exemplified … That astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which if not arrested would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem that the gospel of Christ and the gospel of anti-Christ were destined to originate from the same people … In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the international Jews … This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx and down to Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing … It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth century … There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews … In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by the Jews … The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany … The fact that in many cases Jewish interests and Jewish places of worship are excepted by the Bolsheviks from their universal hostility has tended more and more to associate the Jewish race in Russia with the villainies which are now being perpetrated”

WorldByWolf
Posted - January 4, 2025 at 11:31 AM
Saved - January 6, 2025 at 12:51 AM

@WorldByWolf - Wolf 🐺

“We have a Muslim population in Britain growing by about 75% every 10yrs. If we politically alienate the whole of Islam we will lose”. @Nigel_Farage is controlled opposition and an appeaser on par with Neville Chamberlain. Time for him to retire and hand over to @RupertLowe10. https://t.co/z0egjhvbU9

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Muslim population in Britain is growing by approximately 75% every decade. If we politically alienate the entire Muslim community, we risk significant losses. It's crucial to find ways to include and engage with this population. By 2050, the consequences of failing to do so could be dire.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the number of it is we have a Muslim population in Britain growing by about 75% every 10 years. Right? That that's just where we are. Mhmm. If we politically alienate the whole whole of Islam, we will lose. Mhmm. We'll lose. So how does one include We will lose. By 2050, goodness knows what kind of a terrible state we're gonna be in.
WorldByWolf
Posted - November 24, 2024 at 11:01 AM
Saved - November 25, 2024 at 5:22 PM

@WorldByWolf - Wolf 🐺

A British man asks the police what he’s done wrong and then takes umbrage at the police touching him unprovoked. Three police officers aggressively throw him to the floor and the female officer repeatedly forces his head into the concrete floor. The police are out of control. https://t.co/CiyZbVUyr3

WorldByWolf
Posted - April 29, 2024 at 11:33 AM
Saved - April 29, 2024 at 2:00 PM

@WorldByWolf - Wolf 🐺

Now that @HumzaYousaf has resigned it looks like @AnasSarwar may become the next First Minister if snap elections are called. For those who don’t know much about Sarwar he is a carbon copy of Yousaf. He even copied the famous “white” hate speech. https://t.co/kkZHz1dk7x

Video Transcript AI Summary
All top positions in Scotland are held by white individuals, including council chiefs, government department heads, college principals, and news editors. This lack of diversity raises questions about representation in leadership roles. Translation: All top positions in Scotland are held by white individuals, including council chiefs, government department heads, college principals, and news editors. This lack of diversity raises questions about representation in leadership roles.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Every chief executive of every council and every government department, white. Every director of a department in Scotland, white. Every principal of a college or university in Scotland, white. Every headteacher in Scotland, white. Every chair of a public sector body in Scotland, white. Every high court judge in Scotland, white. Every present governor in Scotland, white. Every editor of a news organisation in Scotland, white. Why?
View Full Interactive Feed