TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @XvirtueSignaler
reSee.it AI Summary
A series of posts highlights various instances where the media has been accused of spreading misinformation and bias. Topics include Trump's comments on neo-nazis, Hunter Biden's laptop, Russian collusion, the effectiveness of masks, COVID vaccine testing, the lab leak theory, Ivermectin, protests, the Whitmer kidnapping plot, the January 6th incident, the Covington kids, Jussie Smollett, a parade incident, the Bubba Wallace garage pull, BYU students' alleged racist insults, and media manipulation. The posts encourage readers to question the media and not be afraid to acknowledge inconsistencies.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
📷/Thread This viral list circulating online was a big eye opener for me, and likely many others. Previously I'd just google and check the 1st site, which was generally a fact-checking page. But they were also repeating the same lies. I’ve recapped the list so you don’t have to.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
🧵My red pill moment: Life-long registered democrat; voted for Biden. Hated Trump; thought he was divisive. My head began to spin at the start of the pandemic. First mental hurdle was that main-stream media and Big Tech had regulatory capture, in a big way as I'll show.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
🧵90% of US media are owned by just 6 corporations ('96 Telecom Act). Much of what is fed to us is propaganda. I previously worked for the press, and cringed every time Trump said 'fake news.' But through COVID they all strangely parroted the same lies.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#1 Trump called neo-nazis "fine people": This full press conference was the single biggest microcosm of the media being disingenuous with their coverage of Trump. I truly thought Trump was condoning racism because they were his supporters -- and it appears that way when taken out of context, backed by the media saying Trump refused to condemn neo nazis. When you watch the full clip you realize he’s only defending the group that wasn’t supporting the cancel-culture of tearing down statues illegally.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#2 Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation: Not only did Joe Biden lie on such a main stage, he had the backing of the Deep State, MSM and Big Tech to censor the story. FBI had the laptop in its possession and knew it was legit. They falsely warned Big Tech (including Twitter 1.0) that a Russian hack-and-leak was about to happen with the laptop and told all platforms to block any info to help Biden get elected. Once you realize they can lie in unison on something this big, you see it's done on a massive scale with all things.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of being a corrupt politician. Speaker 1 responds by mentioning that 50 former national intelligence officials and the heads of the CIA have dismissed the accusations as false. Speaker 0 dismisses this as another Russia hoax. Speaker 1 tries to steer the conversation back to the issue of race.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's a corrupt politician. Right. So don't give me the stuff about how you're this innocent baby. Joe, they're calling you a corrupt politician.
Speaker 1: Nobody President Trump, I wanna stay on the issue of race. We're talking about
Speaker 0: up from hell.
Speaker 1: President Trump is talking about race right now, and I do wanna stay on the issue of race. President Trump Can you just respond to that? Please. Because look, there are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what this he's accusing me of It's a Russian plan. They have said that this is has all the 4 5 former heads of the CIA, Both parties say what he's saying is a bunch of garbage.
Nobody believes it except his and his good friend, Rudy Giuliani.
Speaker 0: You mean the laptop is now another Russia, Russia, Russia hoax? And that's exactly what Is this exactly what This is where he's going. The last stop is Russia
Speaker 1: Russian. I wanna stay on the issue of race.
Speaker 0: You have to be kidding. Here we go again with Russia.
Speaker 1: We're gonna continue on the issue of race. Mister president,
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#3 Russian collusion: DOJ Special Counsel, John Durham concluded his 4-year investigation exonerating Trump from any connection to Russia. In the meantime, they labeled the incumbent president during his election as a foreign agent working for Russia and framed him for treason. The probe relied on the 'Steele dossier' which came from a circular loop of people with little insight into Russia and also made up the Trump pee tape with zero credible backing. Between them lying to tarnish Trump's name, and lying to save Biden's name with his son’s massively incriminating laptop, how is that not direct election interference? If undecided voters knew Biden had a coke-addicted son who regularly slept with sex-trafficked prostitutes and minors, and accepted millions from foreign countries for influence peddling with no qualifications other than his father — or people thought Trump may be a Russian asset, ya that may sway some voters.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The recently released report by John Durham, after a 4-year investigation, reveals that the FBI hastily pursued allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, disregarding evidence that would have led them to drop the case. Durham suggests that confirmation bias played a significant role in the FBI's acceptance of uncorroborated information. He criticizes former FBI leaders James Comey and Andy McCabe for discounting information that didn't support the narrative of collusion. However, the report does not bring any additional charges against Comey or others as Trump had expected. It is important to note that President Biden allowed this investigation to continue along with another one involving Hunter Biden. Durham concludes that while no criminal allegations are made, the actions of the FBI and Justice Department fell short of professional standards.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Court is now here. It has dropped, and it might not have produced everything of what some Republicans sought for. It is regardless devastating to the FBI, and to a degree, it does exonerate Donald Trump. Let's bring in CNN senior justice correspondent Evan Perez. Evan, what exactly did Durham find in this report?
Speaker 1: Well, Jake, the, the bottom line finding from, John Durham's 4 year investigation is that the FBI Moved very quickly to investigate these allegations of connections, of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, And that they did so by ignoring a lot of evidence that would have led them to drop that altogether. He's saying that, they may have had reason to open a preliminary investigation, an assessment. Perhaps these are very, very low level investigations. But certainly what he finds is that there wasn't enough there, to to, to to support the FBI's decision to open a full blown investigation of this, of of the Trump Russia ties back in 2016. I'll tell you, one part of of what he writes here, he says, that it seems highly likely that at a minimum, confirmation bias Played a significant role in the FBI's acceptance of extraordinarily, serious allegations derived from uncorroborated information That had not been subjected to the typical exacting analysis, that the FBI usually uses.
He goes on to say that the FBI discounted or willfully ignored material information that did not support the narrative of a collusive relationship between Trump or Russia and Russia. There's a lot of, Very sharp criticism here of the former FBI leadership, James Comey, Andy McCabe, who were running the FBI and who oversaw a lot of these, a lot lot of the steps that, the, the report goes into, Jake. But as you pointed out, bottom line, there are no additional charges. Nobody is bringing charges against Comey or anybody else, that the former president, Trump kept saying, he expected them to. There was a a a former Trump I'm sorry, a former Clinton campaign outside lawyer who was brought up on charges.
He was acquitted. Again, in here, there's a there's a footnote that points out there's no chargeable crimes against people in the Clinton campaign. Again, Something that the, the former president said he expected this investigation to find, Jake.
Speaker 0: So it's very interesting. First of all, we should note, that when president Biden took office, He, there were 22 special counsels or 1 US attorney and 1 special counsel that he let continue doing their jobs. So one was John Durham doing this case, and the other one was the US attorney in Delaware investigating Hunter. So that is why this was allowed to to proceed. A couple, quotes here from the from Durham's report.
1, based on the review of Crossfire Hurricane, that's the investigation into Trump and Russia, and related intelligence activities, we conclude that the Justice Department and FBI failed to uphold their important mission of strict fidelity to the law in connection with certain events and activities described in the report. And he says about, quote, sir about regarding certain personnel intimately involved in the matter. There was a, quote, predisposition to open an investigation and to Trump. He he is basically saying he's he's these are not criminal allegations, but he's saying that this was unprofessional and failed to meet the standards of the Justice Department and the FBI.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#4 Cloth masks prevent Covid: CDC relied on randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) for everything, except masks. There were only two RCTs done and neither was in the US. Both showed little to no effectiveness for masks. Masks are worn overseas for pollution and in hospitals to keep spit away from others, so unless you think you’re routinely getting spit on in real life, it may not make sense. N95s work on mannequins, but when it’s not perfectly fitted and humans have a tendency to touch and adjust their mask it’s not useful. Fauci was telling the truth the first time he said masks don’t work.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Right now, there's no need to wear a mask. While it may provide some comfort and block droplets, it doesn't offer the level of protection people believe it does. In fact, there are unintended consequences as people constantly adjust and touch their masks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right now, people should not be there's no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a a droplet, but it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is, and often, there are unintended consequences. People keep fiddling with the mask, and they keep touching their
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#5 If you get vaccinated you won’t catch Covid: It was later found the vaccine was never tested for transmission. If we had an honest media, this would’ve been one of its first questions but everyone lied about it.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, various speakers express their frustration with the unvaccinated population. They argue that the unvaccinated are the problem and should be blamed for the spread of COVID-19. The vaccinated individuals feel that their freedom is being disturbed and that the unvaccinated are putting lives at risk. Some suggest mandatory vaccination and higher healthcare costs for the unvaccinated. The speakers emphasize the importance of getting vaccinated for the greater good of society and criticize those who spread misinformation. They also mention the consequences of remaining unvaccinated, comparing it to driving while intoxicated. The video concludes with a statement that the majority of COVID-19 deaths are among the unvaccinated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When the chips are down, these, these civilized people, they'll eat each other.
Speaker 1: You are the unvaccinated. You are the problem. It is the unvaccinated who are the problem, period. End of story.
Speaker 0: The only people that you can blame The only people you can blame. This isn't shaming. This is the truth. Maybe they should be shamed by the unvaccinated.
Speaker 2: Just have to start Blaming the unvaccinated folks, not the regular folks.
Speaker 0: Anyone you came into contact with will blame you as will the rest of us Who have done the right thing by getting vaccinated.
Speaker 3: Because, frankly, we know that we can't trust the unvaccinated.
Speaker 0: I think it's time to get our moral house in order, Anderson. It's the unvaccinated who are the threat.
Speaker 1: All these vaccinated folks are gonna start wearing masks to protect the unvaccinated folks. It's called a Christian value.
Speaker 3: You're basically punishing the vaccinated, for the The sins of the unvaccinated. People are not behaving honorably. The unvaccinated are basically saying, well, it's open season for me. I can do whatever I want as well.
Speaker 0: The the unvaccinated are basically beating their breasts running around the country saying, we don't care. We're living free and so forth.
Speaker 4: We've been patient, What our patience is wearing thin. The unvaccinated, a group that includes children and people acting like children. And the rest of us are starting to get pissed off. The vaccinated feel the unvaccinated are making me upset or angry. This is not about freedom A personal choice.
Speaker 0: Well, my freedom is being kind of disturbed here. No. Screw your freedom.
Speaker 4: The other Howard Stern weighed in with a much different approach. Take a look.
Speaker 0: When are
Speaker 5: we gonna stop putting up with the idiots in this country and just Say, you now, it's mandatory to get vaccinated. They have freedom.
Speaker 4: But you're treading on our freedom, and you're making other people sick. And, really, you're killing other people. The anti Taxers, they seem to have a thing for death and home remedies. The anti maskers turned anti vaxxers are not just putting their own lives at risk. If that was the key issue, we could just say that we can
Speaker 0: watch them compete to win place or show in the Darwin Awards. We have to start doing things for the greater good of society And not for idiots who think that they can do their own research. And don't get me started on the lunatics who won't take Any of the COVID vaccines
Speaker 2: Life is too short to be an ass. Life is way too short to be ignorant of the promise of something that is Helping people worldwide.
Speaker 6: Maybe you're doing it because, you're you're disconnected or disorganized. Maybe you have some sympathetic psychological reasons, But maybe you're just being antisocial.
Speaker 0: Oh, you can't shame them. You can't call them stupid. You can't call them silly. Yes. They are.
Speaker 4: Those who are not vaccinated We'll end up paying the price. The unvaccinated should be taxed. They should pay more for health care.
Speaker 3: We need to start looking at The choice to remain unvaccinated, the same as we look at driving while intoxicated.
Speaker 5: We're gonna see, and I've said, almost Mhmm. 2 types of America.
Speaker 4: Doctor Fauci said that if hospitals get any more overcrowded, they're gonna have to make some very tough choices about who gets an ICU. But that choice doesn't seem so tough to me. Vaccinated person having a heart attack, yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you.
Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse goo, rest in peace, Wheezy.
Speaker 1: Pointing back to the unvaccinated who are really creating a problem in this country. Every death that we are seeing from COVID could have been prevented.
Speaker 4: Literally, the only people dying are the unvaccinated. And for those of you spreading misinformation, shame on you. Shame on you. I don't know how some of you sleep at night.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#6 Covid lab leak was a conspiracy theory: The US Energy Department now openly says the Lab Leak is the most likely origin. The global elites wanted complete control of the narrative from the beginning and with compliance by Big Tech and main-stream media, they got it. It all started with ‘Event 201’, conducted by World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in Oct 2019, meant to simulate what would happen if a world-wide pandemic happened. And the virus ironically happened right after. In the first year-plus of The Plandemic, if anyone on social media mentioned the lab leak theory they would be shadow banned, demonetized or outright de-platformed.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video emphasizes the importance of vaccination and the belief that no one is safe from COVID-19 until everyone is vaccinated. There is a strong condemnation of the unvaccinated, with calls for them to be shamed, blamed, and excluded from society. The speakers argue that the unvaccinated pose a threat to public health and should face consequences such as being fired or even imprisoned. There is also a mention of breakthrough cases among the vaccinated, causing concern and frustration. The overall message is that vaccination is necessary to stop the spread of the virus and protect individuals and society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We wanna make sure that people can discern the truth from the misinformation. And we wanna make sure that everyone understands that no one's safe till everyone's safe. No one is safe. No one is safe.
Speaker 1: No one is safe. No one is safe.
Speaker 2: No one is safe.
Speaker 0: Nobody's safe. No one is safe.
Speaker 3: Nobody is safe.
Speaker 1: This is a post nine eleven axiom, safer but not yet safe.
Speaker 0: No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe from COVID nineteen until everyone is safe.
Speaker 1: If the whole world isn't safe, none of us are safe.
Speaker 0: No one is No one is safe. Nobody is safe.
Speaker 1: Until we're all safe. Health experts have been saying nobody is safe.
Speaker 0: Nobody is safe until everybody is safe. Nobody is safe. Science is Clear. None of us are safe. There is no safe people.
Speaker 1: No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe. No one is safe until everyone is safe. No one's safe.
Speaker 0: Nobody is safe. Nobody's safe. No one's safe.
Speaker 1: We'll never be safe. Until we're all safe. We are never gonna be safe.
Speaker 0: 99.5% of people are safe safe. And will survive COVID nineteen. The only positive thing out of this is we should be able to manufacture a lot of sick. 10 Nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated. You don't have a choice.
As long as not everybody is vaccinated, nobody will be safe. Normalcy sick. We'll see only returns when we largely vaccinated the entire global population. So Get the fucking vaccine.
Speaker 1: You need to get vaccinated. And if you don't, sick. You are going to die.
Speaker 4: I know you're vaccinated. You're the smart ones, but you know there's people out there who aren't listening to god and what god wants. You know who they are.
Speaker 0: Safe. The unvaccinated people. My message to unvaccinated Americans is this.
Speaker 1: If you are the unvaccinated, you are the problem. You'll
Speaker 0: safe. Prox condemn them, shame them, blame them. The only people that you can blame are the unvaccinated.
Speaker 1: Frankly, we can't trust the unvaccinated.
Speaker 0: They should not be part of polite society. Sick. Who won't take COVID vaccines, walking around, lawfully unvaccinated, a psychotic. If you're willing to walk among us safe. You are an enemy.
You have no right not to be vaccinated.
Speaker 2: You don't have the right to contaminate someone.
Speaker 0: You can't go around pointing a gun in somebody's face, which is what it is when people are unvaccinated. They are all idiots and losers.
Speaker 1: This is a real movement in this country against the sick.
Speaker 4: Jennifer Aniston is cutting non vaccinated people out of her life.
Speaker 0: Unrepentant, unvaccinated. They should be removed from the hospital. Those who refuse to be sick. Should be denied health care. Vaccinated person having a heart attack?
Yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy, rest safe. Peace, Wheezy.
You're
Speaker 1: Some doctors are saying they'll refuse treatment for people who choose not to get the safe. Why are hospital and ICU resources going to them? Morons
Speaker 0: who will not get the shot. The unvaccinated clowns. Idiots To think that they can do their own research. Don't do any of your own research. Doing your own research is associated with conspiracy theory circles.
Sick.
Speaker 5: This go it alone approach, doing your own research That can have serious consequences.
Speaker 0: You should get prison time for even questioning the vaccines. Can we all stop saying, I need to do my own research?
Speaker 5: That phrase, do your own research, 4 words, 4 little words that are hurting America.
Speaker 0: Doing your own research hurts safe. America. Everybody
Speaker 5: has a supercomputer in their hand that empowers them to do their own research, and that's the problem. You must not
Speaker 0: do your own research. I need to do my own research. I don't I never understand what that means. I'm doing my own research. You can't do your own research unless you're a scientist.
Sick. Do your own research.
Speaker 1: Maybe you've told yourself you're playing it safe. You just wanna wait and see since this is a new vaccine. Safe. No.
Speaker 0: Roll the
Speaker 1: up and get the vaccine.
Speaker 0: Unvaccinated people spread the virus. Get the vaccine? You dopes. Don't be a Get yourself vaccinated. That's just All is true.
There's no excuse. No excuse for being unvaccinated. There's no rational and no emotional argument that adds set up against getting your damn shot. There just isn't.
Speaker 1: But you made a conscious decision not to get the vaccine. I also have safe. Natural immunity, though for me, personally, this vaccine poses a greater risk than a benefit. I'm also not a risk to any of you. Let's look at the science.
Speaker 6: So we see that the natural infection is given greater protection or slightly greater protection than vaccination.
Speaker 1: This is a vaccine that was created To prevent severity of disease and to prevent hospitalizations, but the vaccine does not prevent you from getting COVID and does not prevent you sick. From transmitting Oh my goodness. Reality. That's not so. Come on.
No. You're gonna Fox TV.
Speaker 0: You still have
Speaker 1: to join. I don't I don't think that we should allow this
Speaker 0: safe. Sick.
Speaker 1: Safe. The virus stops with every Vaccinated person
Speaker 0: Do it so you stop spreading terrible disease. And that vaccine, key goal is to stop the transmission so that you get almost no Almost no, infection going on whatsoever. Expectation for vaccines is not to get infected.
Speaker 1: A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus Does not infect them.
Speaker 0: When the virus gets to you, you stop it. You're not gonna catch it. You're not gonna get sick. You're not gonna transmit it. The vaccine is absolutely bulletproof.
Speaker 1: Safe. Block you from getting and giving the virus.
Speaker 0: 100% effective in preventing COVID. Vaccine prevents you from getting infected.
Speaker 1: To Keep you from getting it and then spreading it. We have the ability to stop COVID in its tracks.
Speaker 0: You're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Safe.
Speaker 7: Biden tests positive for COVID nineteen.
Speaker 0: When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected.
Speaker 7: Doctor Fauci tests positive for COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: Safe. People do not carry the virus. Don't get sick.
Speaker 7: CDC director tests positive for COVID nineteen.
Speaker 0: Safe. Pfizer CEO test positive for COVID. Pfizer CEO test positive for COVID again. CDC director test positive for COVID again. Fauci test positive for COVID again.
Joe Biden test positive for COVID again.
Speaker 1: Cases up safe. 258%. The majority of these cases are among the vaccinated, and this area is the most vaccinated part of Massachusetts.
Speaker 3: Safe. So many fully vaccinated people are testing positive.
Speaker 1: So people here are a bit angry.
Speaker 3: We are all really concerned about what this means long term.
Speaker 2: I was vaccinated, and I got COVID. Safe. Almost everyone we know with vaccinations had at least 1 bout of it.
Speaker 0: Our vaccines work better, safe. Then we could have possibly hoped they would work.
Speaker 1: We are not the problem. The problem are the Unvaccinated.
Speaker 0: The unvaccinated threat. Unvaccinated people are a threat, a direct threat. It's a threat to all of us. The unvaccinated safe. Rescue all of us.
Speaker 1: People have a right to be protected from the unvaccinated.
Speaker 0: Maybe there should be laws that allow them to be kept out of
Speaker 5: the building. So at least, thankfully, they're not Breathe in the same area.
Speaker 0: Their freedom to breathe will diminish. Start firing the unvaccinated. If you
Speaker 1: don't vaccinate, you'll be fired.
Speaker 0: Time to come down on the unvaccinated. They should be safe. Banned from the VA. Banned from restaurants. Banned from other businesses and colleges.
Speaker 2: Companies should not
Speaker 0: treat us as equal. Sick. People under arrest.
Speaker 1: Who's the unvaccinated that has put America in the place that it is?
Speaker 0: We are losing freedom because people are unvaccinated. They are towards the unvaccinated. Sick. Vaccinated. I'm furious at the unvaccinated.
Frustrated with Americans. Still not vaccinated. Not to be vaccinated. Seems criminal. Suspects safe.
Face years behind bars for coughing on police officers Freedom. For them. Charged with terrorist threats. You have no individual rights when it comes to the vaccine. Really, you're killing other people.
Sick. Being attacked by unvaccinated. The unvaccinated who aren't wearing masks. It's the unvaccinated who aren't social distancing. It's the sitting going to crowded indoor events.
It is not your right as an American citizen to catch and transmit a potentially fatal infection. Go screw your freedom. We can coerce you.
Speaker 1: You're not going to be able to travel and to see your family. If someone in your family isn't vaccinated, should you ask them
Speaker 0: not to show up? BS. You really shouldn't have anyone unvaccinated come to dinner. That's Just a huge risk.
Speaker 1: If you wanna come out into public, if you wanna live your life, you need to get the vaccination.
Speaker 0: It's time for people to see vaccination as literally necessary. You should have To show that you're vaccinated in order to go places. Unvaccinated janitorial can't travel to the US.
Speaker 1: If you're not vaccinated, you're not welcome.
Speaker 0: Our precious is wearing thin. Why hasn't the president sick. Morons, scolding the unvaccinated. The refusal has cost all of us.
Speaker 1: Continued damage the unvaccinated are doing to themselves and the country.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#7 Ivermectin is a horse dewormer and not for humans: Ivermectin was administered 2 billion times to humans, who it was designed for. But like many medicines that work for humans they are then also used on animals. The scientists who discovered ivermectin won the Nobel Prize in 2015, but a full-on smear campaign was started once it showed promise in stopping Covid. If another medicine was found to help Covid the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) would not have been granted. Ivermectin is one of the safest drugs on the market, safer than Tylenol, with little downside. But its patent expired with drug company Merk so no one could get rich off it.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#8 Mostly peaceful protests: Because Black Lives Matter (BLM) and George Floyd riots were mostly supported by the establishment, the media made them out to be peaceful despite $2 billion in damages and at least 25 deaths.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#9 Governor Whitmer kidnapping plot: The media was in a race to claim Trump’s followers were dangerous as the election neared. The FBI conjured up a kidnapping attempt of the far-left wing Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer. Only problem is they later found almost all of the 14 supposed kidnappers were paid FBI informants.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Six right-wing militia members who allegedly plotted to kidnap Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer will go to trial soon. One member has already pleaded guilty and is expected to testify against the others. The case against these alleged extremists relies heavily on the involvement of government informants and undercover FBI agents, raising questions of entrapment. The FBI was aware of every aspect of the plot and even offered guidance on how to carry out the kidnapping. Despite this, Whitmer has gained sympathy as a victim of former President Donald Trump's rhetoric. However, the FBI agents and Michigan State Police Troopers involved in the operation were thanked by Whitmer herself.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, Robbie, what's on your radar?
Speaker 1: Well, remember the right wing militia members who allegedly plotted to kidnap Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer because of her COVID nineteen lockdown policies? Well, they will go to trial in just a few weeks. 6 of them were charged in connection with the plot, and one of them has already pleaded guilty and is expected to testify against the rest. State authorities charged 8 others with aiding a terrorist plot. The government's case against these 14 alleged extremists relies on work done by at least a dozen government informants and undercover FBI agents, whose extensive involvement in the plot calls into question whether it would have moved forward at all without the government's prodding.
Some of these government actors took lead roles in organizing the supposed plot. One of the informants was even paid $54,000 by the FBI. Taken together, these and other details raise the strong possibility That the militia members were victims of entrapment on the part of the FBI. Indeed, the revelations have prompted considerable welcome considerable welcome scrutiny of the case from the mainstream media. The FBI investigation into the alleged plot to kidnap Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer has gotten very complicated, conceded BuzzFeed news In a terrific in-depth examination of the available evidence that was published last month.
And earlier this week, the New York Times acknowledged that the involvement of informants and agents had quote, muddled the case. But in any case, it is now abundantly clear that Whitmer was in no real danger. At all stages of the alleged plot, The FBI was aware of every facet of it. Their agents and informants were intimately involved, not just surveilling the militia members, but actively offering guidance on how to pull off the kidnapping. Yet, Whitmer has become a more sympathetic figure on the national stage because she is perceived as a victim of former president Donald Trump's reckless rhetoric and emboldening of right wing domestic terrorists.
Quote, every time the president wraps ramps up his violent rhetoric, every time he fires up Twitter to launch another broadside against me, my family, and I see a surge of vicious attacks sent our way, wrote Whitmer in an Atlantic Article titled The Plot to Kidnap Me. The thrust of her piece is that Trump's criticism of blue state governors inspires real violence, and she very much cites herself as a potential victim of such The thing. Here was Whitmer speaking about Trump's complicity in the kidnapping plot.
Speaker 0: Just last week, the president of the United States He stood before the American people and refused to condemn white supremacists and hate groups like these 2 Michigan militia groups. Stand back and stand by, he told them. Stand back and stand by. Hate groups heard the president's words not as a rebuke, but as a rallying cry.
Speaker 1: Now Trump undoubtedly said many things that Were cruel, vile, wrong. But the person most responsible for the Whitmer kidnapping plot is clearly not Trump. What's the FBI agent who green lit this farce? Ironically, Whitmer thanked them in that same speech.
Speaker 0: I wanna start by saying thank you to our law enforcement. Thank you to the fearless FBI agents And thank you to the brave Michigan State Police Troopers who participated in this operation.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#10 January 6 was an insurrection: Another case where feds were heavily involved was Jan 6, according to FBI whistleblowers. All the footage the MSM showed for the first 2 years was grotesque, but later released video showed a fully unarmed ‘insurrection’ where the doors were opened for most of the ‘intruders’. No one died on that day other than Trump supporter and US Air Force-Veteran Ashley Babbitt who was shot in cold blood by an officer that was later honored for his efforts.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the presence of undercover officers, confidential informants, and FBI assets in the crowds during the January 6th Capitol breach. It mentions that government operatives infiltrated the protests and reveals that the Biden Department of Justice admitted to having 40 undercover operatives within the Proud Boys. The FBI and other law enforcement agencies also had informants and undercover agents present. The video suggests that the government knew about the attack in advance and allowed it to happen to discredit Donald Trump and his supporters. It concludes by stating that the FBI is withholding footage to hide the involvement of undercover agents in committing crimes during the Capitol breach.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right now, I wanna talk about how they figured out that, yes, turns out there were lots of feds in the January 6th crowd breaking. Washington FBI field office confirms undercover officers, confidential informants, and FBI assets were embedded in the crowds at the US Capitol on January 6th. This is an article from Gateway Pundit from May 18th, Thursday. Senator Ted now here's Ted Cruz. He's gonna he's gonna grill the FBI's Jill Sanborn on Ray Epstein.
Do you remember this? First of all, let me let me get back to this. Let me get back to this. Matt Getz confirmed today that the government was running several assets in the crowds during the January 6th 2021 protests in Washington, DC. Dozens, if not hundreds of government operatives filled the protests at the US Capitol on January 6th.
The Gateway Pundit previously identified 20 different confirmed incidents and operations involving federal, state, and local government operatives who infiltrated the massive Trump crowds. Each one of these incidents has been confirmed by the far left press or the government in court documents. We currently have no idea how many federal, state, and local government operatives were working undercover on January 6th, but it looks like It's close to a 100 operatives. I bet you it's way more. Leading the charge on the US Capitol on January 6th.
Recent court documents reveal the Biden Department of Justice admitting to at least 40 undercover operatives within the Proud Boys alone. So department of the DOJ had 40. 40 inside the Proud Boys on January 6th. The US government finally admitted in this letter they sent out before the trial that they were running confidential human resources. They called them CHSs, con those are people working for the Feds.
They call them CHSs inside the o Oath Keepers organization. In November of 2022, the FBI finally admitted that they had 8 informants inside the Proud Boys organization on January 6th and likely more. So the FBI had 8. The DOJ had 40. The FBI had as many as 8 informants inside the Proud Boys in the months around the January 6th capital attack, recent court papers indicate raising questions about how much federal investigators were able to learn from them before and after it took place.
So They you know that the feds knew that January 6th was gonna happen, and so now you know. But why didn't they do anything to try to stop it? Because they were egging it out and pushing it on because they wanted this to happen. Yeah. Because what would be the long term consequence of that?
Consequences that is you can disqualify Donald Trump from being president again because you can disqualify his whole political organization, his whole political movement as terrorists. And that's what they did. The Department of Justice and remember, if it wasn't Donald Trump, if Bernie Sanders actually had this act to go ahead and grab power, They'd be doing this to Bernie Sanders and Bernie Sanders supporters. The Department of Justice admitted to 40 government shocked. The Department of Justice now admits that another 40 undercover agents were with the Proud Boys.
The vast majority of the group was paid by the government as either w two employees or as CHS's. And here at least 2 law enforcement agencies each numb each outnumbered the FBI in terms of running undercover agents, informants, and CHS's on January 6th. 1st, the DC metro police had 13 undercover plainclothes agents among the Proud Boys and other part so they had 13. The the FBI is admitting to 9. The Department of Justice says 40.
There appears to have been 19 CHS's on January 6th belonging to the agency, called HIS, homeland security investigation. So that's even more. Wow. When added to the 8 FBI's, Barlow, this means that there were at least 40 undercover informants or agents doing surveillance among them. On Thursday okay.
So there you go. And the number keeps growing to 50 or more that they are admitting to. Breaking another doozy of a motion filed today by the Proud Boys defense lawyer re related to informants undercover agents. The number of DC metro undercover agents keeps growing. So let's see.
Where's the number? And just the last weekend, the defense learned that there was at least 10 to 12 additional previously unknown plainclothes Metropolitan Police Department officers among the proud boys. This brings the total number of informants among defendants on or around January 6 to 6 or 50 or more. And there's great reason to re believe that number is higher. And now this Washington DC FBI field office confirmed on Thursday that undercover officers, confidential informants, and FBI assets were present despite the w the FBI director, Wray, testifying that there weren't.
So that guy should be imprisoned. And so he Michael Shellenwerg, who, done a lot of reporting, and he he he says this. Indeed, there may have been hundreds of undercover government hundreds of undercover government agents and informants, both local and federal, in the January 6th crowd. According to 1 January 6th witness, there were a 100 to 200 Secret Service agents alone at the capitol before and during the breach of the police barriers. So no they'd even no one's has even mentioned the Secret Service yet.
I wouldn't it wouldn't it wouldn't surprise me if there were a 1000 feds in that goddamn. And by the way, they won't release and they won't release the video. Right? So this is a FBI whistleblower testifying under oath that FBI won't allow 11000 hours of January 6 footage to be released because it would expose undercover agents committing crimes inside the Capitol. Not only was January 6th a Fed setup, but now it's confirmed that the FBI is also covering its tracks.
So just as we've been reporting all along, January 6th was a fed operation, and now they're covering their
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#11 Officer Sicknick was murdered by protesters: Footage showed protesters, and mostly agent provocateurs, hitting the police officer over the head with his helmet on. Sicknick died the following day due to 'natural causes' from a medical examiner after suffering two strokes.
Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 6th, a mob breached the Capitol building, resulting in the deaths of five police officers. The Democratic Party and the national news media quickly labeled it a deadly insurrection, a phrase that carried emotional weight. However, surveillance footage from inside the Capitol showed mostly chaotic but peaceful scenes. The media also falsely claimed that Officer Brian Sicknick was murdered with a fire extinguisher, which was later retracted. The video evidence disproves this claim, as Sicknick can be seen walking in the Capitol after the alleged attack. The January 6th committee, aware of this footage, chose not to release it to the public, revealing their dishonesty.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Within hours of January 6th, literally hours, you began to hear that day described as a deadly insurrection and not described by 1 news outlet or 1 politician but in unison by all of them. Almost like it was coordinated. A deadly insurrection. That's how history may record January 6th. But the tape that we reviewed from within the building on that day proves It was neither an insurrection nor deadly.
Here it is. January 6th, when an Estimated 2,000 rioters breached the capitol building, causing the deaths of 5 police officers.
Speaker 1: Certain dates echo throughout history. December 7, 1941, September 11, 2001, And January 6th, the mob beat officers with anything they had on them, hockey stick, flagpole, a fire extinguisher. Police officers died. Donald Trump supporters who, of course, rioted and killed police officers.
Speaker 0: By the evening of January 6th, the Democratic Party and its publicist in the national news media had settled on a description of what had happened that day. They distilled an enormous number of highly complex events, events that even now we don't fully understand into a single emotionally elated political slogan which they've repeated for years with remarkable discipline. January 6th they said, was a deadly insurrection.
Speaker 1: There was a deadly insurrection that the right wing is trying to cover up.
Speaker 0: He incited a deadly insurrection.
Speaker 1: Incited a deadly insurrection. The violent deadly insurrection on the Capitol 9 months ago. It was about white supremacy in my view.
Speaker 0: A deadly insurrection. Everything about that phrase is a lie. Very little about January 6th was organized or violent. Surveillance video from inside The capital shows mostly peaceful chaos, but the slogan worked. The term deadly carries enormous emotional power, which is why they used it.
To prove the insurrection was deadly, propaganda pointed to the death of an officer called Brian Cichnik. The mob killed officer Brian Cichnik. That's what they said. It was their single most powerful indictment of the January 6th protesters and of Donald Trump and of Republican voters nationally. They repeated that claim for years.
They are still repeating it. At first, they told the country that officer Cichnek was murdered with a fire extinguisher. Officer Brian Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during the fight. That story came from the New York Times, which is effectively the assignment editor for most of the rest of American media. It was a lie untrue in any way.
But only after that lie had hardened into conventional wisdom did the newspaper bother to retract it.
Speaker 1: The New York Times has quietly retracted its story about the death of Capitol Police Sir Brian Sicknick.
Speaker 0: The damage had been done. Brian Sicknick himself, a Trump voter, had been transformed without his consent into a political martyr of the His memory was shamelessly exploited by the incoming Biden administration. In February of 2021, Sicknick's body lay in state in the capital rotunda, where a parade of unscrupulous politicians made use of it. Here's Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Breaking down the doors, Trying to overturn an outcome of election and killing several police officers in the meantime.
Speaker 0: But Brian Cipniak should not be reduced to a prop Up for the political ambitions of the democratic party. He was a human being. The facts of his life matter including how he died. To this day, media counts described Sicknick as someone who was quote slain on January 6th. The video we reviewed proves that is a lie.
Here is surveillance footage of Sicknick walking in the capitol after he was supposedly murdered by the mob outside. By all appearances Sicknick is healthy and vigorous. He's wearing a helmet so it's hard to imagine he was killed by a head injury. Whatever happened to Brian Sicknick was very obviously not the result of violence he suffered at the entrance to the Capitol. This tape overturns the single most powerful and politically useful lie Crats have told us about January 6th.
And it was indeed a lie. The January 6th committee knew perfectly well that Brian Sicknick was walking normally way through the capital after he was supposedly murdered by Trump supporters. And they know that because they saw this tape. We can be sure because the footage contains an electronic bookmark that is still archived in the capital's computer system. That means that investigators working for the Democratic Party reviewed this tape.
They saw it but they refused to release the tape to the public. Why? Because this tape would shatter the fraud they were perpetrating on the country because hiding the truth serve their political interest. They lied about the police officer they claimed to revere. If they were willing to do that then their dishonesty knew no limits.
Subscribe to the Fox News YouTube channel to catch our nightly opens. Or is that are changing the world and changing your life from Tucker Carlson tonight.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#12 Don’t Say Gay was in a bill: MSM is quick to demonize the Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis, and new presidential nominee, who created a school bill. Nowhere in the bill did it say ‘don’t say gay’ as was routinely labeled in the media. Instead it simply said public schools couldn’t teach sexual orientation or gender identity to kids from kindergarten to third grade, which most protesters may agree with if they knew what it actually said.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#13 Covington kids: Covington Catholic HS student Nick Sandmann was portrayed as an aggressive Trump-supporting racist with a smirk on his face in a standoff with a Native American at a pro-life rally on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in DC. In fact, Sandmann simply stood there with his hands behind his back as the Native American approached him banging a drum in his face. Sandmann later won millions in defamation lawsuits when a full video surfaced showing his innocence.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#14 Jussie Smollett: The former “Empire” actor maintains he was the victim of a racist and homophobic assault from two Trump supporters. But an investigation revealed Smollett was guilty of setting up the whole hate crime. Not before a cast of Hollywood celebs including Biden and VP Kamala Harris pledged their support for Smollett.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jussie Smollett's associates reveal their side of the story in the Fox Nation special, "Anatomy of a Hoax." They explain how they planned the attack on Smollett, arriving at the scene early and without phones. They approached Smollett, yelled the slurs he requested, and threw him to the ground. To make it look more real, one of the associates gave him a noogie and tried to leave a mark. This new information contradicts Smollett's original claims and sheds light on the staged nature of the incident.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. It was only a year ago, member after Jussie Smollett was sentenced to 150 days in jail for faking a hate crime against himself in downtown Chicago. Now that happened back in 2019. Now Smollett claimed that he was attacked on a freezing January night by 2, quote, white supremacists wearing MAGA hats that shouted, this is Trump country, and specifically targeted him because of his race and his sexual orientation. Of course, we now know that all of that was false.
Smollett actually hired 2 of his associates to stage the attack, and they are now telling their story or their side of the story for the first time in the new Fox Nation special, Anatomy of a Hoax. Take a look at this.
Speaker 1: So we got here with 10 minutes to spare, and we had to plan our escape route to survey the land. After His building is actually right here, right above the stairs that we're going to attack him at. We made sure we got there at 2 AM I Sharp. On a dot. On a dot.
We had no phones because he did not want us to bring any phones. He said, so we don't lose them. I don't know if that's asking really the reason. That's him. It's that him.
That's that That's that Get that Get that Oh, he's moving fast. Come on. Let's get him. Get that Get him. As we cross the street, we say hey to get his attention.
Hey, Nick. Hey. He turned around, after looked at us, and that's when we started yelling, the famous slurs he wanted us to yell. Hey. Aren't you that empire after empire fat It's MAGA country.
Yeah. And then he said, what did you say to me? After And then that's when I threw the 1st punch at him, and then I threw him to the ground. And while after I threw him to the ground, I He had no bruise. I wanted it to look more real.
So then I threw him to the ground. After I threw him to the ground, I used my knuckle I And gave him a noogie. So I went like this. Why did I do that? To give him a after Scar to give him a mark to make it look real, like, he really did get his
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#15 SUV killed parade marchers: As has become custom with the media, whenever a minority group commits a heinous crime, often race isn’t mentioned. Such was the case when a BLM supporter and Black nationalist drove into a Wisconsin parade and was labeled 'Tragedy caused by a SUV'.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#16 Bubba Wallace garage pull: When the MSM demand for racism exceeds the supply, as is the case with most of these, the situations are almost fabricated out of thin air.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A noose was found in Bubba Wallace's garage stall, causing confusion and concern. However, the FBI has determined that no federal crime was committed. New video evidence shows that the noose was in the garage since October 2019, before Wallace used that particular stall. This incident occurred amidst racial tension and Wallace's call for NASCAR to ban confederate flags.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For a moment, a stunning display of solidarity on the racetrack helped soothe the nation reeling from racial tension. But now confusion after a noose found in the garage stall of Bubba Wallace, the only black driver in NASCAR's cup series, may not have been directly targeting the driver. The FBI saying after a thorough review of the facts and evidence surrounding this event, We have concluded that no federal crime was committed. New video evidence showing the noose found in Wallace's garage number 4 was in that garage as early as October 2019, before it was his and months before Wallace demanded NASCAR ban confederate flags.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#17 BYU students hurled racist insults at Duke volleyball player: An avid sports fan most of my life, I’ve grown to hate ESPN and their race-baiting tactics. The godmother of the player brought attention to the incident with the accusations. It turns out the godmother was running a political campaign and likely created the narrative to gain sympathy for her in this victimhood culture we live in.
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's an ongoing battle, but on good days, we find the courage to fight for the best in us. White supremacy is the biggest terrorist threat to our country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's never really over. But on the best days, enough of us have the guts and the hearts to stand up for the best in us. The most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland is white supremacy.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#18 Many will claim, 'I don't even watch the news.' And I was the same. Yet I still had (incorrect) passive knowledge that everything in this thread was truthful prior to peeling back the surface.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
#19 The media has trained us to think we are racist conspiracy theorists if we acknowledge the craziness pointed out in this thread. Fight the fear. If you can relate to my political confusion at the start of the pandemic please retweet and follow.
reSee.it AI Summary
Chamath Palihapitiya, an early Facebook executive, admits he was wrong about President Trump. He now praises Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, for his thoughtfulness and intelligence. The All-In Pod also commends Trump's willingness to meet with world leaders and his business mindset. Initially critical, Chamath now sees Trump as a pretty good president.
@XvirtueSignaler - Reality Check
Chamath Palihapitiya thought very little of President Trump when he came into office. But as time passes, he realizes how wrong his outlook was. The ultra-successful businessman and early executive at Facebook shows how a true free thinker can adjust their opinions. The whole All-In Pod also praised Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, a senior advisor to Trump and in charge of brokering peace between Israel and Palestine. Kushner's recent long-form interview on Lex Friedman's podcast brought praise. Chamath: "But Jared Kushner is thoughtful. He's smart. I was fed all these lies for years about how this guy was, like, moping around in the shadows and this and that, and it was all not true. David Sacks: "[Trump] was willing to meet with Kim Jong Un. He was willing to meet with Putin and Xi Jinping, and he avoided criticizing them personally. He didn't call them dictators. He talked about how smart they are. It's the art of the deal. Right. I mean, at the end of the day, he's looking to do business, and we need a little bit more of that. And I think this is why Jared Kushner was successful. He went in there with the mindset of a businessman. How do we find something that's beneficial to both sides?" Chamath: "I think that when Trump was elected, I was told that it was the end of the world, and that's what I thought. And I'd already underwritten him as an F, okay? And then, four years into the presidency, he was probably like a C in my mind. And then, as I get a little bit of distance away, I realized, no, hold on a second. This guy was like a B, B-plus. Like, he was pretty good. "But the further and further I get away from him and the less emotional I am, he did a pretty good job. He was a pretty good president." @theallinpod @chamath @DavidSacks @Jason
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jared Kushner is described as thoughtful and competent, contrary to the lies that were spread about him. Despite the nontraditional approach of sending a president's family member to the Middle East, he did good work. Trump's willingness to do business and negotiate without moral condemnations was seen as smart. He met with leaders like Kim Jong Un, Putin, and Xi Jinping, avoiding personal criticism. This approach was beneficial for both sides, and Jared Kushner's success can be attributed to his businessman mindset. Initially perceived as the end of the world, Trump's presidency was later seen as pretty good, with the potential to save America from fiscal ruin through initiatives like 100-year bonds. Overall, he did a commendable job as president.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The most important thing that is resoundingly obvious about Jared Kushner is that he is incredibly thoughtful and incredibly competent. And Right. Why did we have to spend years being fed all of these stupid lies because one can judge for oneself, but Jared Kushner is thoughtful, he's smart, and I thought to myself, I was fed all these lies for years about how this guy was, like, moping around in the shadows and this and that, and it was all not true. Well, no. When I say it's nontraditional, if you sent, you know, any president's son-in-law, daughter-in-law, whatever child to go to the Middle East.
On its surface, this seems insane. But in fact, he they did good work. And so it's not traditional. It's it's not what you would expect. Thoughtful and competent.
That's what I thought after I that's what I got out of it as well, is that he's thoughtful and competent.
Speaker 1: The thing that was smart about Trump Was that he was willing to do business. Yes. He was willing to negotiate, and he didn't feel the need to make these moral condemnations all the time. He was willing to meet with Kim Jong Un. He was willing to meet with Putin and And Xi Jinping, and he avoided, criticizing them personally.
He didn't call them dictators. He talked about how smart they are. Yeah. It's the art of the deal. Right?
I mean, at the end of the day, he's looking to do business, and we need a little bit more of that. And I think this is why Jared Kushner was successful is went in there with the mindset of a businessman. Yeah. How do we find something that's beneficial to both sides?
Speaker 0: Totally right. I think that when Trump was elected, I was told that it was the end of the world and that's what I thought. And I'd already underwritten him as an f. Okay? And then 4 years into the presidency, he was probably like a c in my mind.
And then as I get a little bit of distance away, I realized, no, hold on a second. This guy was like a b b plus. Like, he was pretty good. And, unfortunately, the few things that if he if he could have just pushed through would have really saved America, the biggest one being these 100 year bonds. It it would have kept America from getting to the precipice of fiscal ruin and we'd be in a highly different situation.
And I'm not sure we could have ever given him credit for it, but the further and further I get away from him and the less emotional I am. He did a pretty good job. He was a pretty good president.