TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @YossiBenYakar

YossiBenYakar
Posted - November 23, 2025 at 5:29 AM
Saved - November 24, 2025 at 4:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see posts claiming Muslims view dogs as najis and that, in Britain and Europe, this leads to forced removals, threats, and “no-go zones,” with policing seen as biased and a two-tier justice system. Some call for bans on groups and deportations, while others argue Christians face penalties and migrants reshape public space.

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

According to Islamic law, dogs are considered “najis”, impure. In this video, a Muslim violently hits a woman’s dog and forces her out of the public area, simply because the animal is “unclean” in his eyes. This is what happens when extremist religious norms overpower basic human decency.

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

https://t.co/l7o4UYz7Lt

@robertbrynin - R S Brynin, Anglo-Jewish Author

@YossiBenYakar Muslims can get away with murder, but if they come near our dogs ... In the trilogy, the government of the Islamic Republic of Denmark orders all dogs put down. ONLY THEN do the people of Denmark rise up against their new masters and reclaim their country. https://t.co/grW6QAX1AP

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

https://t.co/ydwF8tjlG7

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

In the UK, an Islamist tells police they must not bring dogs into “his area” — and openly threatens to kill any dog that comes near him. And as always with the UK police, they listen… letting him spread fear and hatred, toward Jews and even toward innocent dogs. For those who don’t know: in Islamist doctrine, dogs are considered “Najis” (impure).

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that Zionists came in with their dogs as an act of provocation, and asserts that if those dogs come close again, it will be seen as an act of aggression, and they will kill those dogs.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: However, when the when those Zionists came in with their dogs Yeah. That was an that was an act of provocation. So what we're saying now, and I'm making it very clear so everyone understands Yep. If those dogs come close to us again, we will see it as an act of aggression, and we will kill those dogs.

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

https://t.co/O1EcP8rk9v

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

This infamous sign from 2014 warned dog-walkers in London to stay out of "Islamic areas." ​For many Islamists, dogs are considered "Najis" (ritually unclean). ​This wasn't an isolated incident. It was the beginning of a phenomenon that has only escalated. This isn't a request; it's a claim of territory and an enforcement of their own rules on British soil. Is this the quiet establishment of 'no-go zones' in Britain?

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

https://t.co/EL0dZsUJow

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

In Britain, that Islamist guy is explaining to everyone what the difference is between them and the sinners. He explains that they are true believers, that they have no problem dying for Allah. Yes, this is in Europe, this is in Britain, and this is happening right next to police officers who aren't doing anything about it.

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

In the UK, an Islamist tells police they must not bring dogs into “his area” — and openly threatens to kill any dog that comes near him. And as always with the UK police, they listen… letting him spread fear and hatred, toward Jews and even toward innocent dogs. For those who

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

https://t.co/SYRX0OHz8X

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

UK Christians are now being sentenced to two years in prison simply for preaching in public. Meanwhile, Muslims freely pray in the streets, no fear, no fines, no restrictions. If this is “equality,” why does it only ever seem to punish one side? https://t.co/NQgNOhfwJb

Video Transcript AI Summary
TBN Tonight, hosted by Martin Dobney, presents a report about a development in Rushmore Borough Council, led by the Labour Party, which has sparked public outrage. The core issue described is a proposed sweeping injunction that, if enacted, could criminalize certain street-preaching activities carried out by Christians. The report highlights that the injunction would carry penalties including imprisonment for up to two years for anyone who breaches its terms. The grounds for enforcement are framed as concerns over causing offense or distress in the community. The specific provisions of the proposed injunction are outlined in the report as restricting several practices commonly associated with Christian street preaching. Under the terms as described, Christians would be banned from praying for individuals in public spaces, a practice traditionally associated with street ministry. They would also be prohibited from handing out religious leaflets or Bibles by hand, which would target the distribution of religious materials directly to passersby. Additionally, the injunction would prohibit laying hands on people in prayer, even if the individuals involved have given explicit permission to be prayed over. The report emphasizes that these restrictions would apply to public exhortation or activities aimed at sharing religious beliefs in street settings, and that breaching the injunction could result in a substantial custodial penalty of up to two years. The framing in the broadcast underscores the tension between religious expression in public spaces and the measures proposed by local government officials to address concerns about offense or distress caused to the public. Viewers are informed that the controversy centers on balancing freedom of religious expression with considerations of public offense, distress, or nuisance, as invoked by the proposed legal instrument. The discussion implies a broader debate about how such injunctions would operate in practice, what constitutes offense or distress, and how such terms would be interpreted and enforced by authorities. While the report notes the council’s involvement and the potential consequences for individuals who engage in these activities, it presents the key facts of the proposed policy and the severe penalties associated with its breach. In summary, the broadcast reports that Rushmore Borough Council, under Labour leadership, is proposing an injunction aimed at restricting Christian street preaching, with prohibitions on praying for individuals, distributing religious materials by hand, and laying on hands in prayer, and imposes a penalty of up to two years’ imprisonment for violations. The presentation foregrounds the outrage and controversy surrounding the proposal.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: TBN tonight with me, Martin Dobney. Now the Labour ran Rushmore Borough Council has sparks outrage by proposing a sweeping injunction that could see Christian street preachers imprisoned for up to two years if the injunction is breached now over claims of causing offense or distress. Now under the proposed terms, Christians will be banned from praying for individuals, handing out religious leaflets or bibles by hand, and laying hands on people in prayer even with their permission.

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

https://t.co/kA4wYykM6u

@Shannon45277368 - Kafir Kitty

@YossiBenYakar No. More than ever, dogs are needed. https://t.co/6LFXjN3fqi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hello. Are you okay? Why are you bothering her? So she refused. Yes. But then why force if she refused? But that’s not how you hit on a woman. Okay, but that’s none of your business. Me, it’s none of my business, but stop looking. If he doesn’t like that we’re assaulting women, he can look at me. I like you that way, that doesn’t concern him either. Well, after a while, he’ll stop looking, he’ll intervene. I propose we leave; we’ll leave, it’s at our place, we’re going to leave. And why are you like that? We do what we want, go ahead, please move and end it there. Attention.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bonjour. Vous allez bien Pourquoi vous l'embêtez Du coup elle a refusé. Ouais. Mais du coup pourquoi forcer si elle a refusé Mais ça ne marchera pas, ce n'est pas comme ça qu'il faut draguer une femme. D'accord, mais ça te regarde Moi, ça ne me regarde pas, mais arrête, le regarde. Si il n'aime pas qu'on agresse les femmes. Il peut me regarder, je t'aime bien comme ça, ça ne regarde pas lui aussi. Bon, au bout d'un moment, il va arrêter de regarder, il va intervenir. Moi, je vous propose de partir, on en reste là. On va partir là, on on va partir, c'est chez nous, on va partir. Et pourquoi vous êtes comme ça On fait ce qu'on veut, vas-y, s'il te plaît, bouge et tranché là. Alors attention.

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

https://t.co/JaydIP6BtQ

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

https://t.co/CyqUi8fHoW A British woman, simply walking her dog, was told to leave the area or face arrest. Why? Because Muslim migrants in the neighborhood “don’t like dogs.” Let that sink in: In 2025, British citizens are being policed to accommodate the demands of migrants. How did this become normal?

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

https://t.co/yCmvqNBHSV

@LizaRosen0000 - Liza Rosen

Britain should ban the Muslim Brotherhood and deport Muslims who want to impose sharia laws. https://t.co/0ypvikZYqz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks how to weed out Muslims in a country that despises you and means you harm without vilifying or persecuting those who are fine and part of the social fabric. Speaker 1 responds by highlighting that Arab states have taken a strong stance against the Muslim Brotherhood and asks why the West hasn’t. The Muslim Brotherhood has been banned in Egypt and in many Gulf states (not Qatar), and there is a reason: they know how dangerous this organization is, that it doesn’t represent peace-loving Muslims who simply want to practice their religion and not impose a perverted version of jihad. Speaker 1 asserts that the Muslim Brotherhood is not pro-Muslim; it is an organization providing cover for terrorism that disproportionately impacts Muslims, especially in the Arab world. He emphasizes that the biggest victims of terrorism are the people of the Middle East, the majority of whom are Muslims, and urges people to educate themselves about what’s really happening on this front before it’s too late. Speaker 0 then asks why Europe is failing and has massively open borders, taking people from regimes where terrorism is life-threatening. Speaker 1 answers with a single word: subversion. He claims this is most evident in the Israel-Palestinian conflict, stating that the way the war and the conflict are presented in international media is not an accurate reflection of what’s happening on the ground. He believes many Palestinians would share that sentiment. He contends that what’s happening in Gaza is not how it’s reported, because narratives are shaped to present a certain story, a process he attributes to Al Jazeera. He questions who runs Al Jazeera and asserts it is state-run by Qatar, and says they have been a chief sponsor of a “laundered ideology” presenting Palestinian victimhood even if some stories are fabricated. He claims Al Jazeera has falsified stories during the Gaza war. Speaker 1 concludes that when people push back against Islamism, they’re accused of conspiracy or exaggeration, but the speaker argues that there is a conspiracy to undermine the West. He acknowledges that it may seem crazy to say so, but asserts that such a conspiracy is exactly what is happening. He identifies this as the fundamental ideology of Qatar, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Islamic Republic of Iran on the Shia side, and says this is something that must be spoken out against to educate the general public.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How can you weed out Muslims in a country who despise you and mean you harm without actually vilifying or persecuting those who absolutely do not, who are absolutely fine, who are part of our social fabric? Speaker 1: I think that's a really, really great question and brings up something that I wanted to mention just a second ago, and that is that the Arab states have taken a very strong stance against the Muslim Brotherhood. So why hasn't the West? The Muslim Brotherhood has been banned in Egypt. They've been banned in many of the Gulf states, obviously, not Qatar. And there's a reason for that because they know how dangerous this organization is, that it doesn't represent peace loving Muslims who simply wanna go about their lives practicing their religion and not bothering anyone else or trying to impose some sort of perverted version of, jihad, and that is exactly what the Muslim Brotherhood does want to do. So there is a difference. They are not pro Muslim. This is something really important to to understand about all of all of the issue with with the Palestinians, but especially with the Muslim Brotherhood. This is not about Muslim rights or Muslim civil rights. They are an organization that is providing cover for terrorism that disproportionately impacts Muslims, especially in the Arab world. The the biggest victims of terrorism are the people of the Middle East, the majority of whom are Muslims. And I think that people need to educate themselves about what's really happening on this front before it's too late. Speaker 0: Why do you think it is that Europe is failing to do this? Why is it that Europe has massively open borders that we are taking people from regimes where we know terrorism is life? I can't wrap my head around this. Well, simply put, if Speaker 1: I had to sum it down, sum it up to one word, it would be subversion. And we've seen that nowhere more prominently than the issue between Israel and the Palestinians. The way that this war, this conflict has been presented, especially in the international media, is completely accurate to what's happening on the ground. I think a lot of Palestinians even would agree with that, sentiment. What's happening in Gaza is not how it's being reported in the news because they wanna present a certain narrative, and that is a lot of it is being spearheaded by Al Jazeera. Now who runs Al Jazeera? The state of Qatar. That's state run media. And they have been one of the chief sponsors of this, laundered ideology and and presenting it as something that, oh, the Palestinians are victims of everything that happened even if the stories are completely fabricated in some cases. We know that Al Jazeera has completely falsified stories during this war about Gaza. And so when people push back against Islamism, they say it's a conspiracy. You're exaggerating. It's not really that bad in order to distract the public from what's really happening. Because as a Western person, we don't wanna believe that there's a conspiracy to undermine the West. It seems crazy. It seems extreme to say that. But the reality is that is exactly what they're doing. That is the fundamental ideology both of Qatar, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Islamic Republic Of Iran on the Shia Muslim side. This is something that we need to speak out against to to educate the general public about.

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

https://t.co/cBVU1NhXkP

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

The double standard in Britain is now impossible to ignore. ​If you are a Christian praying or singing hymns on the street, you face restrictions. But if you block a public space for Islamic prayer? The police stand back and do nothing. ​They are simply too terrified of being called "Islamophobic" to enforce the law equally. ​We are watching a two-tier justice system in real time.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The dialogue centers on whether singing church songs is permitted outside church grounds and who determines the authorization for such practice. The exchange begins with a claim that religion can be practiced anywhere, but this assertion is challenged. One speaker says, “No, miss. You're not allowed to sing church outside of church grounds, by the way,” followed by a repetition: “You're not allowed to sing church songs outside of church? Outside of church or church songs outside church.” This introduces a conflict between an apparently stated freedom to practice religion in public versus a restriction on singing church songs in non-church spaces. Further remarks reiterate the restriction: “You're not allowed.” The response that follows, “That's fine. That's fine. You're allowed,” appears to acknowledge the stated prohibition, while a later line, “She just said you're not allowed to sing church songs outside of church,” reinforces the sense that the prohibition has been asserted clearly, though the situation remains confusing or contested in the moment. The speaker then references the location of the church’s influence, saying, “Our church is outside the church grounds unless you have a …” which trails off, indicating an attempt to clarify under what conditions the church’s authority applies beyond its physical boundaries, but the sentence is left incomplete. This suggests there is a consideration of whether the church’s authorization can extend beyond its grounds and under what circumstances such authorization would be required. A key element introduced is the notion of authorization: “Authorized by the church through this kind of song.” This line implies that any singing of church songs outside the church may need explicit approval from the church, tying the activity to an official authorization rather than an unconstrained freedom. The conversation ends with a pointed question about human rights: “Are you saying that you don't care about the human rights act? You're lost?” This introduces a legal or rights-based dimension to the dispute, juxtaposing religious expression with potential human rights considerations, and framing the other party as disregarding those rights. Overall, the transcript captures a dispute over the permissibility of performing or singing church songs outside church premises, the extent of the church’s authority to authorize such performances beyond its grounds, and the potential relevance of human rights law to the discussion.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Religion you're allowed to do anywhere. No, miss. You're not allowed to sing church outside of church grounds, by the way. You're not allowed to sing church songs outside of church? Outside of church or church songs outside church. You're not allowed. That's fine. That's fine. You're allowed. She just said you're not allowed to sing church songs outside of church. Our church is outside the church grounds unless you have a That's a load of it. Authorized by the church through this kind of song. Are you saying that you don't care about the human rights act? You're lost?

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

https://t.co/9ZwtgvIjxA

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

Americans are fed up with what’s happening in Dearborn and the demographic shift driven by rising Islamist influence. One man put on a vest, walked straight into a pro-Palestinian rally, and held bacon just to provoke the protesters, and they were instantly offended. Islamophobia.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says Dearborn, Michigan needs to be cleared and swiped to Muslims. They don't know how to behave. Let's retake them. They don't wanna be anywhere near Dearborn.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is why Dearborn, Michigan needs to be cleared and swiped to Muslims. They don't know how to behave. Let's retake them. I don't wanna be anywhere near Dearborn.
YossiBenYakar
Posted - August 21, 2025 at 5:57 AM
Saved - August 21, 2025 at 5:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The situation in Britain is appalling, reflecting a betrayal of justice and morality. I shared the story of John from Lancashire, whose 13-year-old daughter was gang-raped by Pakistani groomers in Oldham. When he sought police help, he was told to “let it go” or face arrest for racism. This reveals a disturbing reality where young girls are victimized while authorities, fearing accusations of Islamophobia, fail to act. The system appears complicit in protecting predators. How many more children must suffer before this scandal is addressed? Is this truly what “protection” means in modern Britain?

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

https://t.co/lm58uQPF97 The situation in Britain is an utter disgrace—a betrayal of justice and morality. Listen to John from Lancashire: His 13-year-old daughter was gang-raped by Pakistani groomers in Oldham. When he pleaded with the police for help, a constable had the gall to say, “Let it go, or I’ll arrest you for being racist.” This is the sickening truth: young girls are preyed upon, their lives destroyed, while authorities cower, paralyzed by the government’s fear of being labeled Islamophobic. The system isn’t just failing—it’s complicit, shielding predators to dodge accusations of “intolerance.” How many more children must suffer before this scandal is exposed and the guilty are brought to justice? What do you think? Is this what “protection” looks like in modern Britain?

Video Transcript AI Summary
John recounts that in 02/2004 his daughter was, gang raped Pakistani Muslims from Oldham. They traveled 18 miles to his town to get to his daughter. After he phoned the police, they told him to 'let it go' or he would be arrested for being racist; she 'could pick any boyfriend she wanted.' He says nothing happened; four cars and a van came from Oldham to look for him, and a friend warned him not to come into town. He says he is not racist and has Muslim friends; one friend said, 'there's a lot of us' and blamed clerics. The host suggests MPs should be grilled by the SAS because 'they've known all along what's been going on, and they buried it.' He wants perpetrators, 'rounded up and put in prison.' His daughter, around 30, has a husband and grandchildren; they buried it but it lives with him.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'd like to talk to you about my daughter, back in 02/2004. My daughter was, gang raped Pakistani Muslims from Oldham. They traveled 18 miles to my town to get to my daughter. I phoned the when I found out, I phoned the police up. Now this had been going on for a few weeks, and I didn't know because I used to work hundred hours a week to pay for me kids to go to private school. And when I found out, I phoned the police up. Police constable come to them. I basically told them what has been going on, told me to let it go. Otherwise, I will get arrested for being racist. She could pick any boyfriend she wanted. She was 13 year old, and he was 20. Speaker 1: I don't know what I don't know what to say to you. I mean, first of all, thank you. Thank you for for on the show. You're telling me the police genuinely said to you, let it go. Speaker 0: Let it go. Speaker 1: Your 13 year old daughter is being groomed by a 20 year old who's traveled 18 miles to your hometown. You're phoning me now live from Lancashire. Your daughter was raped by a Muslim man. You know this for a fact. She admitted that. You went to the police, and nothing has ever happened. Speaker 0: Nothing happened. The only thing that happened is that four cars and a van came up from Oldham to look for me to do me. And, I had a friend who phoned because I was at work at the time, phoned me up and said, John, don't come into town. He said there's a a huge gang of Muslims looking for you. He said, don't come into town. He said, we can tackle this afterwards. So, obviously, there were no point falling the police up again because I did what I need that blood down. Speaker 1: Let's not talk about that because I don't I don't I don't wanna talk about that because I don't want to to say anything that will get you into trouble. Let me ask you, if you're okay with this, a couple of questions. Are you racist? Speaker 0: No. Speaker 1: When you Speaker 0: Mostly as I have Muslim friends. Speaker 1: What do they say about this abhorrence? Speaker 0: Oh, well, I have one chap. I won't mention his name, and he's turned around to me. He said, I'm so sorry, John. He said, but he said, there's a there's a lot of us. He said, alright. We know what's been going on. He said, but he said, it it's all down. He he put it all down to the clerics and whatever that they go down to the mosques. Speaker 1: But your friend and people like him, and I'm not having a go at your friend, they need to be vocal. I've been saying this for weeks. The the the police Yeah. I I I'm this is why I agree with Mike Graham wholeheartedly. There needs to be maybe not a national inquiry. And if there is gonna be one, it doesn't need to be the police because they can't mark their own home. Well, there's too many problems with the police. And I believe and and and yours is a personal story, Johnny, but I've been saying all afternoon that I believe this goes higher and deeper than any of us can possibly imagine. Can we talk about something that we don't talk about, which is the victims? How is your daughter? How old is she now? Speaker 0: She well, she's a she she's 30 well, she well, think she's about 30. And what she got she got a lovely husband. She got we got lovely grandkids. And this, we we we buried it from day one, but it lives with me every day. Speaker 1: That lives with you, and I understand that as a father. What about her? Speaker 0: Oh, she she still has the memories. You know? But it she's like she's moved she's had to move on. Speaker 1: But as a father, you I suppose the first emotion as a father, and I mean this in the right way, you'll know you let me get the sentence out, you wanna protect your kids. And when you're not able to, not through your own fault in any way all, it lives with you forever. Right? Speaker 0: Exactly. What what do you want Speaker 1: for what what do you wanna see happen as this becomes quite rightly a national scandal? What do you wanna see happen, buddy? Speaker 0: Well, I'll I'll tell you what I'd like to see. I'd like to see every MP to be grilled by the SAS because they've known all along what's been going on, and they buried it. Speaker 1: It's absolutely disgusting. It's a stain on us as a country. May I I'm I'm so grateful that you were you felt able to to share your story, and I'm glad in part that your daughter has been able to move on. I'm sorry for you as well because there will be people. But, you know, a lot of people will say the first question to you was you're racist because a lot of people, Joli, will say, you're just saying this because you're just making no. No. We're not. This is a fact. And whether it's because of illegal migration or certain religions, cults, creeds having a different view, I don't give a damn. Morally, I keep saying this. It is disgusting. It is repugnant. It is a stain. It is a disgrace. And these people, I don't care whether it's I don't care who it is. They need to be rounded up and put in prison. John, I really, really, really appreciate you phoning the show. My love to your family. Thank you so much indeed.
YossiBenYakar
Posted - February 19, 2025 at 12:52 PM
Saved - June 7, 2025 at 3:31 AM

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

Thank you, Switzerland, for cutting funding to UNRWA! A perfect time to take a closer look at their terror-driven education system: How sickening is this? This is a "Palestinian" school graduation ceremony. And yes, UNRWA plays a direct role in shaping this indoctrination. https://t.co/oocQokdhbi

YossiBenYakar
Posted - May 4, 2025 at 5:57 AM
Saved - May 4, 2025 at 7:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a British child's frustration about learning Islam in school instead of British history, sparking a discussion on cultural education. I highlighted concerns about the UK government's alleged silence on grooming gangs, referencing a former PM's directive to police. I also mentioned a troubling incident involving an illegal immigrant attempting to assault a young girl and a brave woman confronting immigrants about Britain's Christian identity. Lastly, I exposed the ongoing issue of grooming gangs targeting young girls, emphasizing the need for accountability and justice.

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

Listen to this British child speaking out: 🇬🇧 "They are forcing us to learn about Islam & Mohammed in school. I don’t want to know this. I want to learn about my own culture." What do you think about teaching Islam in the UK instead of British history? https://t.co/6KMYFqJTUI

Video Transcript AI Summary
In schools, there's pressure to learn about Islam instead of English culture and beliefs. The speaker is proud to be English, but wasn't taught about the Bill of Rights or the Battle of Agincourt. The speaker says school taught about Islam and Mohammed's ideologies, barely covering Christianity. When the speaker tried to discuss negative aspects of Mohammed, they were suspended for being racist. The speaker claims to have been questioning an ideology, not being racist, and believes free speech is being suppressed. The speaker says they were suspended for discussing the wrongs of Islam, because schools only portray it as peaceful, which the speaker disputes based on their book.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In schools, they're pressuring us to learn about Islam and learn about the people that are coming up. I don't wanna learn about that. I wanna learn about my culture, my beliefs, and I'm proud to be English. Have they taught you about the Bill of Rights? No. Did you learn about the Battle of Agincourt? No. In school, they teach they were teaching us about, you know, about Islam, about proper Mohammed, and all their and all their all their ideologies. They barely covered they barely covered Christianity at all. Did they tell you about how he was a warlord who brutally brutally murdered me? They wouldn't say any of that. And when I tried to stand up and say that some of them picked, I would get in trouble for it. Dispended from school because apparently I was being racist. I wasn't I was just trying to, you know You're questioning I'm questioning an ideology. I was questioning the ideology. In my opinion, it's not the right ideology. I'm trying to take away my free speech at school. I'm trying to silence people to suspend me from school for, you know, trying to stand up and discuss stuff about Islam, the wrongs of it. Because they only say, oh, Islam's a peaceful religion. But if you look into if you look into their book, you'll find out it's not.

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

Wake up UK! Follow me @YossiBenYakar and @LizaRosen0000 to support us https://t.co/s9UBHRiChT

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

🇬🇧 Ex-Police Officer Dion Miller reveals: Former PM Gordon Brown sent a letter to all Police Forces, ordering them not to get involved with grooming gangs! Is the UK government complicit in this scandal? Are they silencing the truth to avoid Islamophobia accusations? https://t.co/CSmPm8n8Cv

Video Transcript AI Summary
A clip features ex-police officer Dion Miller discussing a letter allegedly sent to all UK police forces by then-Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Leon Miller, an ex-police officer from Leicestershire Constabulary, states that she received several commendations, including one from the Prime Minister. She addresses current police officers regarding a statement made on BBC Radio 4 by former chief crown prosecutor Nasir Afwas. Afwas claimed that in February 2008, the Labour government, under Gordon Brown and Jackie Smith, sent a circular to all police forces stating that young, exploited girls had made an informed choice about their sexual behavior. Therefore, police officers should not get involved. Miller asks if the officers were aware of this directive.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A clip of an ex police officer called Dion Miller has surfaced of her talking about a letter sent to all police forces around The UK by then, at the time, prime minister Gordon Brown. And the contents will truly shock you. Speaker 1: My name is Leon Muller. I'm an ex police officer from Leicestershire Constabulary. During my service, I was awarded several letters of commendation. I received a chief constable's commendation for outstanding service and was the recipient of a bravery award from the prime minister at that time, which I received at Number 10 Downing Street. Thank you. I've not come here to speak to you today. I've come here to speak to them, police officers of this country on the 10/19/2018, and I hope you are listening. Former chief crown prosecutor, mister Nasir Afwas, stated in an interview to the BBC Radio four that in 02/2008, the Labour government under prime minister Gordon Brown and home secretary Jackie Smith sent a circular to all police forces in this country saying that as far as these young girls who are being exploited in town, we believe that they have made an informed choice about their sexual behavior. And therefore, it is not for you police officers to get involved in. Did you know that?

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

@LizaRosen0000 Why does the UK government do this to the British citizens? Follow me @YossiBenYakar and @LizaRosen0000 if you want to uncover the truth. https://t.co/spue3Wo0y0

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

Watch in the UK: Muhammad Abdullah an illegal Muslim immigrant, posed as a security guard in Scotland, probably thinking British citizens are as foolish as their government, attempted to rape a 12-year-old girl. Caught and arrested. Muhammad says, "Why, what is the problem?" https://t.co/GrvP7rDngO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker demands to know what someone has been saying to a 12-year-old child. The speaker insists on being looked at and accuses the person of communicating with the child. The speaker asks how long the person has been in Scotland, noting they communicated a sentence earlier. The speaker suggests the person is pretending. The speaker states the person is not moving until the police come.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What have you been saying to this child? What type of now look at me. I'm having a conversation. Look at me. What have you been saying to this 12 year old child? What have you been communicating with her? Excuse me. Excuse me. We're having a conversation. No. Speak? Well, you write very well to this 12 year old child. And you were speaking very well before. How long have you been no. No. How long have you been in Scotland? How long have you been in Scotland for? How long have you been in Scotland? Well, you've just you've just communicated with me a sentence, so I think you do. I think you're just playing a bit of Oh gosh. Imagine how this 12 year old feels. You're not moving till police come. Why? Because you're not. You don't understand that, didn't you?

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

@LizaRosen0000 https://t.co/riYg3zSxru

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

https://t.co/gHWEWEJfOF A brave British woman speaks out. She confronts Muslim immigrants in the streets, declaring that Britain is a Christian country. Tragically, they quickly dismiss her away, claiming Britain is now theirs and no longer Christian. What are your thoughts on this?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that the country is a Christian country, repeating the claim multiple times. The speaker accuses someone of being jealous that "we're taking over." Another person denies that anyone is taking over and asks how this is happening. The first speaker insists "we've got it" and claims "you can't." The speaker suggests someone may think they are safe, but implies they are not.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What? The it's a Christian country. Christian country. It's a Christian country. Yes. It is. This is a Christian country. You're jealous. You're jealous that we're taking over. You're not taking over. Why are you taking over? How are you taking over? Yeah, mate. We've it, mate. We've got it. You can't. That's you think. You might. You ever been safe. But

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

@LizaRosen0000 https://t.co/VcaLvFQVqx

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

Exposing the Pakistani Rape Gangs in the UK: Since the 1980s, the UK has been plagued by a horrific practice known as "grooming gangs." These groups, predominantly composed of men of Pakistani origin, have targeted and raped young girls, luring them with gifts and alcohol. 🧵 https://t.co/aIg9Nv5aBH

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

@LizaRosen0000 https://t.co/NwvEgAfq39

@YossiBenYakar - Yossi BenYakar

🇬🇧 Manchester, UK: Umar Hamid, a predator from Pakistan, tried to rape a 14-year-old British girl—until brave British patriots stepped in and caught him! What punishment does Umar deserve for this horrific act? https://t.co/PBR5d9bQ1C

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker confronts an individual, accusing them of grooming a child and planning to have sex with her, referencing condoms. The speaker claims to have evidence despite the individual possibly deleting it. The speaker questions the individual's early morning activities outside a flat and accuses them of using fake accounts to trap kids. They mention sending live locations and pictures of a front door. The speaker states the individual is getting arrested and remanded, as the police are present. They tell the individual to leave kids alone.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't daring me. You'd be saying please release me later, but you ain't getting released. Christmas dinner in the cell, lad. Yes. Yes. Got one extra at Foley's Park. Can't forgive the liars. You're not selling the truth, so I can't forgive you. So we got we have to now wait for the police to come. But you've got about two minutes before the police come. Well, could you tell me the truth then? Please please please means nothing, does it? Tell me why well, tell tell me that you're sorry that you groomed a child. And you did tell her that you was gonna have sex and have a condom, didn't you? Did you? Did you say he was gonna bring have a condom use condoms? Listen. Right? Every time you pull away, that's when it hurts to stay calm, and it won't hurt. Merry Christmas. Uma, honey. Uma, Uma, Oliver. By the way, this guy likes to use a different account trying to trap the kids, see if she's talking to other men. Uma Hamid comes to meet a 14 year old girl, tell her she's gonna bleed, bring condoms. Yeah. Yes. Yes. I you might have put all you think you might have deleted all, but I've got it. Watch me that is. Feel the weight of that. Hey. Can you feel it? Yes. Ready for the fleece, you? Aren't you? Tell her to go to the pawn site. You always have a romantic time with her. Lice over. You thought you so clever. Tell you something, you know, picking you up though, but tell you something, you've gotta get up out fucking really early to get one over on us and telling you. 05:00. Hey. What was you doing outside the flat twenty eight twenty past five in the morning? Send me the location, tell him to come out of her house. Tell him, tell your house when, no. My mama asked me where I am. Come out. Come out. Come out. You stopped for hours and hours from Stoke On Trent to where sending live locations, pictures of the front door. You wronging. You wronging. You are getting arrested today. You are getting remanded because it's Manchester police. Police are here. Police are here already, mate. Yeah. Fucking kids alone, cunt. Stay there. Stay
View Full Interactive Feed