TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @YukonStrong

Posted - October 29, 2025 at 4:58 AM

Saved - October 29, 2025 at 2:43 PM

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇺🇸

Can you imagine waking up tomorrow & finding out you don’t own your home anymore? Life’s work flushed down the toilet. Literally millions of Canadians in for a wake up call on just how fucked up Canada really is. Gun owners & outfitters warned you all https://t.co/atMlJdsobP

Video Transcript AI Summary

The discussion centers on the handling and potential consequences of a land claim proceeding and its impact on landowners. - The attorney general position is described as not sharing a certain viewpoint and being deeply disappointing that neither attorney general argued extinguishing. Landowners are being pressured, and there is concern that the city of Richmond is applying pressure. - Randy Elaine asks for direction given the possibility of four to six years before a final decision, noting problems with banks, insurance companies, and mortgages due to land claims on properties. She asks whether property values will be devalued during the process and whether those changes will be considered. She asks if individual owners will need to challenge their assessments year by year as values may decrease, and whether those issues will be addressed. - The response acknowledges the concerns: there is a real cloud on titles for properties within the area outlined in black, and negative consequences such as decreased home equity, effect on land values, and potential adverse reactions from lenders and insurers are possible. The speaker agrees that all those negative outcomes are real and urges that every argument be advanced on the appeal, since the injustice is that the implications could apply to any fee simple owner in British Columbia, with over 2,000,000 titles potentially susceptible to the same outcome. - Regarding assessments, the speaker notes that BC Assessment handles that matter and cannot definitively state what they will do. He emphasizes that it is a real problem and invites confidential details to be shared. He says the mayor intends to bring an application with the province to stay the proceedings until the appeal outcome, and that the information provided by landowners is valuable for that purpose. - Randy adds a point about the judge reportedly saying that the college and tribe did not need to notify all individual property owners, indicating there is further discussion to be had about notification and procedural aspects.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The attorney general because we don't we don't share it. We we we don't share that opinion, and and and we find it deeply disappointing that neither attorney general neither one of them argued extinguishing. And now here we are pleading landowners to pressure them as the city of Richmond is pressuring them. Speaker 1: Alright. The next speaker is Randy Elaine. I know there are a lot of questions that can't be answered here. Perhaps you can give us some direction. Given that we may have four or five or six years not knowing what the final decision will be in that time as prior speakers have already noted, there are issues with banks and insurance companies with mortgages because of the land claims on our properties. Would there be some sort of recourse in that our property values are gonna be devalued quite substantially in some cases while this is going on? So will that be taken into account? And I know that you are city lawyers in the property tax assessments. And will we have to will that be looked at? Do you feel, or will will each individual owner have to challenge their assessment on a year to year basis while this goes on and our property values are decreased? Speaker 0: In answer to, there are many issues that you raised there. And yes, I absolutely agree that all those negative things, home equity, all that is above it. There's a cloud. If you're in the if your property is within the area outlined in black, there certainly is a real concern. And the only solution, unfortunately, is to have this matter overturned on appeal, which is again why I'm saying we have to make sure all arguments are advanced because it is unfair. It is hugely unfair that you as a landowner now face all the negative consequences of this decision that you just described. And the real injustice is that the implications of what you just described can apply to any fee simple owner of British Columbia. There are over 2,000,000 titles in this province. All now are susceptible to the same outcome. And, yes, it is it is a problem. It will affect your land values. It could trigger negative consequences from lenders. It it could trigger negative consequences from insurers. All those things are true, which is why we are imploring that every argument be advanced on this appeal. As for assessment, again, that's a matter with BC Assessment. I can't really speak to what BC Assessment will do, But, again, it is a real problem, and and I appreciate you sharing that. And, again, if there's details of that that you're able to share with us, not here in a public forum, but confidentially, please contact us because as the mayor said, we intend to bring an application together with the province to stay the proceedings until the outcome of the appeal. And all that information you described is valuable information for that purpose. Speaker 1: Okay. Thank you. I would like to say again, I know that it's been spoken about that the judge is the one who said that the college and tribe did not need to notify all the individual property owners. And I think I

@YukonStrong — Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Posted - May 15, 2025 at 5:00 AM

Saved - May 15, 2025 at 2:44 PM

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

The real enemies aren’t on the outside 🇨🇦 They’re within https://t.co/mqOxcXwO3j

@YukonStrong — Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Posted - April 10, 2025 at 1:01 AM

Saved - April 10, 2025 at 1:37 PM

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Once again The charter of privileges and maybes crushes Canadian freedom @LichTamara https://t.co/ZqKvANLPEP

@YukonStrong — Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Posted - January 30, 2025 at 4:51 PM

Saved - January 31, 2025 at 3:27 AM

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

"UK does not look like a country which won the war. Western civilization is the political legacy of Christianity, and that's dying." Tucker goes savage on Piers Morgan https://t.co/GCmcufxCyj

Video Transcript AI Summary

The current state of Great Britain raises questions about its post-war recovery, especially considering the long rationing period. There's frustration over the alliance with Stalin during WWII, particularly the decision to hand Poland to him after fighting to protect it. The moral implications of this alliance are troubling, as it undermines any moral authority to lecture others. While acknowledging the threat of Hitler, there's a call for a reassessment of Churchill's actions and their consequences for Western civilization. Despite defeating the Nazis, the decline of Western values and Christianity is concerning. The discussion highlights the complexity of historical leadership and the ongoing impact on society today.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Here's my problem with Churchill. Again, the current state of Great Britain does not look to me like a country that won a war. Looks like a country that lost a war badly and was degraded. How did that happen? Why? You're not allowed to ask that because people like, oh, that's holocaust denial. The country of a lot of my ancestors looks like it lost a war. How did that happen? I think it's a totally fair question and anyone who says it's not a fair question is a liar and I'm not gonna be intimidated because I'm part English, so buzz off. What's the answer? And so I don't think that you can You can't Speaker 1: put it on Churchill. Speaker 0: I don't put it entirely on Churchill. Speaker 1: You can't put any of it in Churchill because it's actually if you look at if you look at the sixties, you would say that that Britain was absolutely roaring post war. Right? It's only Oh, really? Speaker 0: Your manufacturing was dying. Well, you were rationing until the fifties. Like, how did this work? Speaker 1: Well, because we've just been in the World War. Speaker 0: I'm I'm saying that's an awfully slow recovery for a winning nation. If you won, why did you have rationing for 10 years after? But here's here's the real problem to be much more specific. I don't know how you could say to the English people, it is essential that your sons go die to preserve the territorial integrity of Poland, and then hand Poland to Stalin of all people. I don't know how you could be in an alliance with Stalin, the greatest mass murderer in history. I don't know how Roosevelt could be in an alliance with Stalin. Once you're in an alliance with Stalin, you lose all moral authority. Speaker 1: So what do you do about that? Speaker 0: Not allowed to lecture me about anything. Let me You're in a military alliance with those of Stalin. Speaker 1: Let me take you back. Who murdered all the Let me make you president. Speaker 0: Tens of millions of people. Alright. Speaker 1: Let me make you president of United States at the time. Speaker 0: I'm not against fighting World War 2. I'm not I'm not. I'm only saying specifically with reference to Churchill. You can't go to your country, your countrymen, and say go ahead and die to preserve the dignity of Polish territorial integrity, the dignity of Poland, the nation of Poland, and then give it to Stalin, and it languishes under an iron curtain. People are murdered and rounded up and tortured to death for 40 years. Speaker 1: That wasn't what Churchill did. Speaker 0: Yes. It is what Churchill did. Speaker 1: Because he came in after the war started. No. No. Speaker 0: At Tehran, Pazda, Mjalta, he they made a deal to hand Eastern Europe, which he had brought his country to war to protect to Stalin. There is no getting around the fact that Stalin is maybe the worst person in all human history, but certainly in the running. I don't disagree. So you're in a military alliance with Joseph Stalin? You shut the fuck up. You have no right to lecture me about anything. Okay? That that's where we start. And that's been sort of a lied it over. The Roosevelt administration armed Stalin in lend lease. Tell me how that's defensible. It's not Speaker 1: defensible. But that's the the question I was asking. Speaker 0: What But to hand Poland, would you went to war to protect I I hate to Stalin. Like, why doesn't someone answer that question? They're like, oh, we had no choice. Really? Speaker 1: But what my question though is Then Speaker 0: you're a failed leader. But what would Speaker 1: you have done about Hitler? Speaker 0: I would have opposed him. Of course. How? I I certainly wouldn't arm Stalin. I certainly So how would you murdering Christians and Speaker 1: What would you, though? Speaker 0: To be Speaker 1: I'm I'm genuinely Speaker 0: curious. No idea what I would have done. I would have been opposed to him. I am opposed to him. I mean, it's not so I love this conversation. So it's like, there's no way to reassess anything without getting right to so you're for you're for Hitler. Right? Or you would just let people ramp those through Europe or something. Speaker 1: I'm not saying that. I'm not saying that. I'm just curious. If you don't do what Churchill did, I'm curious what you think we should have done. Speaker 0: You act on behalf of your country. That's your job. Yeah. I don't care. If you're a theologian, we certainly didn't look at it. Have you been there? Speaker 1: Well, my country? Yes. I live in my country. Oh, okay. Speaker 0: Great. So you know. No one looked after Great Britain. It ran the world. Now it's degraded. Now you have Sadiq Khan, like, giving the finger to Christianity in your capital city. It's like, what? This is the seat of ism globally. Or even in downtown Berlin, the war is the effort to save western civilization and I agree with you that Hitler was a grave threat to western civilization. Ask Dietrich Bonhoeffer. But that was lost. So where's the victory? Yeah. But it wasn't lost. Really? Really? Where is it? Where's western civilization thriving? Speaker 1: No. What has happened is you've seen Britain's power in the world diminishing ever since. That is true. Speaker 0: What is Western civilization? Well, that's an interesting question. Speaker 1: I would say that for for example, I would say one of the reasons that well, the three reasons It's Christianity Speaker 0: is what it is. Speaker 1: Well, that's okay. I I know that you believe that strongly. Well, what okay. Speaker 0: I'm a cap I'm a cap, Speaker 1: but your preaching is acquired literally. Speaker 0: No. But if it's not Christianity, what is it? It's Christianity. That's what it is. It's the political legacy of Christianity and that's dying. And I'm not saying Churchill was its assassin. I'm just I'm just saying, like, he didn't save it because it's dying. Speaker 1: And Well, can we agree he saved us from the Nazis? Speaker 0: I I guess, but I'm saying it was a pure victory. I mean, beating the Nazis is always good. You wanna beat the Nazis. Okay? I'm I'm for beating the Nazis, to be clear. The Nazis were a threat to western civilization. They were a threat to Christianity. But if Churchill saved it, where is it? Speaker 1: Well, I think that's a that's a perfectly legitimate question. Speaker 0: No. I know. Yeah. And they call me a holocaust denier for bringing that up. Speaker 1: I don't call you that. Speaker 0: Well, no. But I'm just saying, like, I got so attacked. But that's not only a legitimate question, it's the question. And I'm very upset about it because I think Western civilization is the best thing this world has ever produced. Speaker 1: Can can I ask you about something that happened big in the American election which we're now wrestling within our country? Woke

@YukonStrong — Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Posted - November 7, 2024 at 4:36 AM

Saved - November 7, 2024 at 5:12 AM

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Holy crap! this is the most savage and based smackdown I’ve ever witnessed in political debate anywhere. https://t.co/6tFLB594i9

Video Transcript AI Summary

Cenk criticizes a non-American for chanting "USA," emphasizing that Donald Trump’s actions, including attempting to overturn the election and inciting a riot, demonstrate a lack of class. He expresses disappointment in the Democratic Party's campaign strategy, suggesting they rely too much on donors. Patrick, the guest, explains he was invited to the U.S. as a politician and respects the country for its role in promoting freedom, particularly for Poland, which he says was liberated from communism thanks to American efforts. He expresses gratitude towards the Republicans for their support and asserts he does not want communism to return, labeling Kamala Harris as a communist.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Cenk, go for it. Go ahead, Cenk. Yeah. This brother isn't isn't even American. So I don't know what the hell he's chanting USA for. I'll chant USA, not you. Okay? And so second of all, you're talking about losing with class when that bitch Donald Trump tried to steal an election, tried set to terminate the constitution, or set off a riot, that he didn't mind if his vice president was murdered, bum rushed to capital, tried to destroy our democracy. He he's the very worst in how That does do you. Losing and losing with no class at all. Here I am telling you that I think the Democratic party would did it wrong. I think they ran a wrong campaign. They're relying on the donors. They've got the wrong strategy. So we are honest about what goes wrong in the Democratic Party and what goes in the Republican Party. Are you guys honest about the fact that Donald Trump tried to steal an election? He's got no class at all. Speaker 1: Patrick, if I may So please sentence. Speaker 0: Cenk, go for it. Dominic. Speaker 1: Guys, if I if I can ask you for another moment of silence. Speaker 0: Who the hell is this guy? Are you Victor Orban's cousin? Speaker 1: Yes. I'd like to have a I'd like to have a conversation. I would like to answer. You asked me why I am in US now, because I was invited, and I came here with my passport. So I was invited. Patrick invited me as a politician to come to US because as a European, as a Polish, I do recognize US as a leader of the free world, and I pay my respect to this country. Speaker 0: Good. Speaker 1: And I came here, my friend, and I came here because I used to live under communism. My country was under communism, and Reagan with John Paul the second freed our country. And I will be always grateful to the republicans of United States for the freedom of Poland and Europe. And my presence here in America is my way to pay respect to those who free the world from the communism. And that was America and John Paul the second. And I do not want communism back. And Kamala is a communist.

@YukonStrong — Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Posted - October 30, 2024 at 11:34 PM

Saved - October 31, 2024 at 4:39 PM

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Wow, @vesperdigital brings the receipts It’s looking more and more like Trudeau is in bed with 🇨🇳, or at the very least knew about the treason and did nothing because it benefitted him politically. https://t.co/sPxPSQULgT

Video Transcript AI Summary

Canada's spy agency warns that China's media manipulation is now common, with calls for stronger foreign interference measures. Reports suggest a covert Chinese election interference network funded the 2019 federal election, and intelligence briefings indicated attempts to influence the 2021 election in favor of a Liberal minority government while targeting Conservatives. Allegations include $250,000 funneled from the Chinese consulate to support candidates. Experts highlight Beijing's strategies, including leveraging proxies and disinformation campaigns, to undermine political opponents. Concerns grow over the normalization of foreign influence in Canadian politics, with a need for robust defensive measures against such threats to democracy.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: There has never been any information given to me on the funding of federal candidates by China. Speaker 1: Canada's spy agency is warning that China's attempts to manipulate the media are becoming the new normal. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service raised that issue in a meeting with prime minister Trudeau earlier this year, and there are renewed calls now for a much tougher approach to foreign interference. Speaker 2: Trudeau did not address reporting by Global News that sources say a clandestine election interference network was covertly funded by Chinese state entities in the 2019 federal election, and that the prime minister was briefed in 2022 by Canadian intelligence officials on these stunning allegations of political interference schemes. Canada's chief electoral officer says he's not aware of Beijing interfering beyond global news reports. Speaker 3: I've not received any reports regarding specific instances of noncompliance with the legislation or or or specific instances of Chinese interference in the election. Speaker 4: MLI senior fellow, J Michael Cole, warns that Ottawa also needs to contend with the possibility of interference by Beijing. The Chinese regime has every reason to regard the upcoming elections as an opportunity and to engineer the election of a future government that is more to its liking. The Chinese Communist Party, or CCP, has a variety of tools at its disposal, honed by experience in other jurisdictions such as Taiwan. For example, it could escalate its economic warfare against Canada by targeting sectors of the economy and export reliant parts of the country with the aim of alienating those ridings from the current government. I woke up to an explosive report Speaker 5: in The Globe and Mail this morning reporting that CSIS documents viewed by the newspaper reveal China's strategy to influence the 2021 election. Beijing wanted the Liberals to be elected but only to a minority mandate. And according to the documents, China viewed the conservatives as too harsh on China and used disinformation campaigns against them. Alleged Chinese government election interference is rattling Canadian politics. A string of media reports based on leaked intelligence reveals both the 2019 and 2021 elections were targeted. Senior government officials are adamant the integrity of those elections were not compromised. The allegations though are alarming And my next guest says they're just the tip of the iceberg. Chuck Kwan is cochair of the Toronto Association For Democracy in China. He joins us now from Toronto. Mister Kwan, welcome to the show. Speaker 6: Thank you. Speaker 5: What can you tell us about how Beijing runs foreign interference operations in Canada? Speaker 6: Well, it all started about 34 years ago, after Tiananmen Square massacre when Beijing was eager to burnish its image internationally. And they have start setting up, what I would call proxy organizations. And through these organizations and through their proxies, Beijing has been able to exert very soft influence in many ways, in many levels of our government. Speaker 5: Is that the primary focus or do these operations primarily target Chinese Canadians? Speaker 6: No. They are targeted at Canadian society and at large. Speaker 5: How concerned are you about how the government hasn't done enough or do you think believe the government hasn't done Speaker 6: enough? We can go from website and see who's who who's who and who's meeting whom and that includes a lot of Canadian politicians and government officials being wine and dined. Speaker 5: So help me understand this because the allegation right now, the headline story right now certainly in the Globe and Mail, what was that China wanted to help elect Liberals to get a Liberal minority government and they wanted to defeat conservatives who they believed were had policies that were unfavorable to China. In your experience on monitoring this, is it that starkly partisan? Is China in your view interested in electing Liberals at the expense of Conservatives? Speaker 6: They understand that, perhaps from the proper days, the the the Conservatives are a little bit tougher on them than the Liberals would, and that's why in the last 10, 12 years, they have been pretty much putting the money on the Liberals. Certainly, they are the beneficiary of the Chinese operation. Speaker 4: Given the large number of accredited Chinese diplomats in Canada, we can assume Beijing has thoroughly studied potential vulnerabilities. Likewise, candidates who hew closer to Beijing's line might be promised greater Chinese investment in their writings. Additionally, the Communist Party of China may rely on its various proxies in the business community political donors, captured elites in academia, think tanks and retired government officials as well as communities with large concentrations of ethnic Chinese to undermine the electoral prospects of politicians seeking election. Speaker 2: Separate sources with knowledge of the 2022 intelligence briefs told Global News funds from the Chinese consulate in Toronto allegedly facilitated by a Toronto businessman, Wei Chung Yi, totaling some $250,000 was transferred first to an unnamed Ontario MPP and a federal candidate staff member. Wei Chung Yi denies the allegations. From there, sources say the money was distributed to members of a clandestine network. Intelligence says the network was comprised of at least 11 federal candidates along with 13 campaign staffers. Speaker 4: The Communist Party of China also enjoys near total control of Chinese language media in Canada. Adding to the rampant disinformation being circulated on social media apps, the regime has perfected the practice of discrediting politicians over many years in Taiwan and Hong Kong. And the CCP's content farms are known to spread dis and misinformation, cause confusion, and embattled a targeted government by forcing it to dedicate large amounts of resources to debunking false claims. Speaker 1: Canada's spy agency is warning that China's attempts to manipulate the media are becoming the new normal. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service raised that issue in a meeting with prime minister Trudeau earlier this year, and there are renewed calls now for a much tougher approach to foreign interference. Catherine Tunney reports. Speaker 7: Foreign interference is becoming more sophisticated, frequent, and insidious. That's a warning the head of Canada's spy agency gave to the prime minister during a meeting earlier this year. According to briefing docs prepped ahead of that meeting, CSIS warned the prime minister that foreign states were trying to influence media to get their message out. In particular, the People's Republic of China's media influence activities in Canada have become normalized. Chinese language media outlets operating in Speaker 4: Canada and members of the Chinese Canadian community are primary targets of PRC directed foreign influenced activities. Cyberattacks against political parties, local governments, election Canada websites, and other critical sectors can also be used as a means to interfere with elections and, as with disinformation, erode public confidence in the integrity of an election. And we cannot rule out the possibility that the Communist Party of China will seek to buy outright certain candidates with promises of money or lucrative deals at some point in the future. Finally, in the case of the Liberal Party, former Prime Minister Jean Quetin's recent proposal to visit Beijing and negotiate a deal with Communist Party officials an idea that would ensure the future capture of Canadian nationals whenever Beijing entered into a dispute with Ottawa illustrates the potential for a serious split within the party, which could be exploited by Beijing. Every effort must be made by our intelligence and law enforcement agencies, by the judiciary, and by other government agencies to track suspected foreign interference and implement appropriate defensive measures. Speaker 8: So we have had ample time to have an honest discussion, which I think is not people are not prepared to have. It is also why people are resisting a foreign agent registry because of the number of Canadian elites that would get ensnared in such a registry. These are very serious matters in a parliamentary democracy, and there are many options available to the government today if it wants to show that it is serious about defending Canadian democracy. We need to decide, are we standing with the tyrants, or are we standing up for Canadian democracy? Speaker 0: There has never been any information given to me on the funding of federal candidates by China.

@YukonStrong — Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Posted - October 25, 2024 at 8:31 PM

Saved - October 26, 2024 at 12:14 AM

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Honestly I’m sorry to even tweet this. But by all accounts, it’s verified true. Kidnapped into sex slavery for a decade and fed Baby meat. These are your new Gazan neighbours and when they call death to 🇨🇦, they mean it. https://t.co/tNCEGZJMuW

@YukonStrong — Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Posted - February 9, 2024 at 3:14 AM

Saved - February 9, 2024 at 3:45 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Putin's interview with Tucker Carlson reveals his perspective on the Ukraine conflict, history, and global politics. He criticizes NATO's rejection of Russian cooperation and expansion, blames the CIA for the 2014 coup in Ukraine, and sees Ukraine's invitation to join NATO as a direct threat. Putin claims no territorial aspirations outside of Ukraine and calls for the "De-Nazification" of Ukraine to end the war. He discusses the Nord Stream pipeline, the US dollar's abuse as a foreign policy tool, and the need for global security and cooperation. Putin believes the global economy is shifting away from the US due to aggression, sanctions, and currency control. He mentions the dangers of AI, genetic enhancements, and the need for international treaties. Putin suggests releasing a WSJ reporter as a gesture of goodwill but accuses him of espionage. He sees Ukraine as a US satellite state and blames NATO, Europe, and the West for aggression. The author concludes that Putin enjoys defying NATO and criticizes Canada's reliance on the US, Western support for the Ukraine war, and the push for digital currency. They view China as a global threat and advocate for cutting ties and out-innovating them. The author advises preparing for the worst and calls for immediate changes in culture to avoid downfall.

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

A 🇨🇦 perspective on Putin’s #TuckerCarlson Interview Putin started off with a story of deep historical and cultural knowledge of Ukraine, however as I am of Ukrainian descent myself I noticed he conveniently left out Holodomor. This was a brutal starvation and socialist re-education of Ukrainians just prior to WWII by Stalin, which was overshadowed by the holocaust and events of WWII, even though it was an equally brutal genocide. To me this was a red flag that his account of history was not entirely honest, and certainly one sided. One thing that separates Holodomor from other genocides is that is was done purely in the name of the communist ideal, not territorial, religious or racial division. It was an ideological persecution, the same type we see from Trudeau and the #woke authoritarians in North America. Join the socialist ideal …or else. In his time as president, Putin expressed he felt US Presidential will was repeatedly undermined by US administrative will (the swamp) in his face to face negotiations with multiple US presidents. It seems to me Putin is in a position of advantage diplomatically due to dealing with multiple negotiations and administrations, learning from mistakes and gaining experience over the years whereas every new president is starting out more or less from scratch. In Putin’s eyes the war was not started in 2022, but an attempt to end a war which was initiated by the CIA and NATO. Ukraine’s invasion is a response to repeated rejection of Russia peace initiatives after the fall of the USSR, and NATO’s promise not to expand eastward which was broken 5 times with expansions eastward. This was brought to a head by the CIA initiated coup of Ukraine in 2014 and the military fallout in the Donbas region, and finally triggered by Ukraine’s invitation to join NATO on 2022 forcing Putin’s invasion. In short, Putin sees NATO as repeatedly rejecting Russian attempts at co-operation, followed by NATO claiming territory which is in his view is both historically and culturally Russian, suddenly becoming a NATO member state and posing a direct threat to Russia. I also infer he felt USA was weak under Biden and it was Russia’s first chance to respond from the primary aggression that occured in 2014. Putin claimed he has no territorial aspirations outside of Ukraine, and in order for him to consider an end to the war if will require the “De-Nazification” of Ukraine. Embarrassingly, the Canadian liberal govt has antagonized the situation with their incompetence and attempts at virtue signalling via the invitation of Yaroslav Hunka to Canadian parliament and the stupidity of our politicians to applaud him. He cited this blunder as a recent provocation and example of whY Neo-Naziism needs to be eliminated within Ukraine. Canada must to get rid of Trudeau. With respect to Nordtsream he says responsibility lies with someone who had the will and submarine capability to blew it up. (USA) and claims there is an alternate route for gas to be supplied to Germany from Russia through Poland, Putin is willing to help germany out, but Ukraine refuses to allow Germany to regain energy stability. Putin says the worlds security should be shared and is not meant for the “golden billion” and that is the only scenario the world could become stable, sustainable, and predictable and the world is going through a period of severe disease. Putin then pointed to the US dollar as a tool for foriegn policy abuse as one of the biggest mistakes of US political leadership. By freezing assets and restricting Russia’s transactions they have driven Russia to embrace the yuan, and scared other nations into downsizing their US reserve funds. He alluded to Russia and China’s border to be stable and peaceful, from my perspective it seemed that it is a similar situation as the US-Canada border. Their trade has surpassed 230 billion yearly and is rich in hi tech, energy, scientific research and development

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

In regards to global economy Putin assessed as so: In 1992 the G7 was 47% and BRICS 16% In 2022 G7 is 30% and BRICS has finally surpassed it Putin claims this shift will continue due to US aggression, sanctions and currency control, while the rest of the world focuses on trade, cooperation and growth When posed with the question if a new administration could change the war in Ukraine he responded it would Come down to US foriegn policy stopping sanctions, restrictions, bombing and power abuse He touched on AI, genetic and cybernetic enhanced humans and how they will change the future forever, and as there are no current rules surrounding this fields things are growing dangerous. He alluded to the rise of the global nuclear threat being Akin to the rise of AI, genetic & other fields destroying humanity that an international treaty will be needed to prevent global destruction. When asked if he would release Even Gershkovich from the WSJ as gesture of good faith, Putin said he is open to it, but it will require good will on behalf of USA first. Putin is definitely using him as a hostage bargaining chip, but insisted he is not an innocent reporter and was in fact engaged in espionage, caught seeking classified documents in secret while working for US Special Services. When pressed on Ukraine conflict leading to larger global conflict, Putin sees Ukraine as a US satellite state and that the aggression is coming from NATO, Europe and the west and it will require Ukraine to come to the negotiation table to end the conflict. He claimed the war could have been ended 18 months ago but former UK president Johnson interfered with a Ukrainian treaty signed in Istanbul. He says there is also an element of civil war to the conflict and in some cases even Ukraine’s own troops identify as Russian, and continue to dismantle the Ukrainian Orthodox Church in solidarity.

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

After listening to his statements here are my conclusions, Putin is thoroughly enjoying the fact NATO can’t stop him and will not bend the knee to western will. He sees this all as payback for decades of foreign policy abuse by USA From a Canadian perspective I’ve never felt Canada to be so absurdly weak on the global stage. We are 100% reliant on USA for our survival, yet the USA is losing dominance every year simply due to competing nations having a larger population, bigger economies and better manufacturing. I think western support for the Ukraine war hinges on fears the world is abandoning US dollar reliance more than anything else, and ideological stupidity and naivety by the likes of the current Canadian govt and woke EU nations. I am starting to also view the push for digital currency as not just a tool for power abuse, but as a desperate last ditch effort to combat rise of the BRICS economy. Trust is waning in the US dollar and might globally. Biden’s incompetence and weakness will have decades long consequences. Trump must be elected in 2024. I also view China as the biggest threat globally, including to Putin himself. He is naive to think China is not actively undermining his nation too. I also see our social strife with respect to the #woke UN agenda driven policy, socialism, transgenderism and emasculation of North American men as direct result of Chinese influence to exploit and weaken western society. It is highly likely that China is infiltrating both the west and Russia through technology / espionage and IMO the best thing the west could do would be to completely cut ties with China and out innovate them on our own soil to regain global superiority economically and militarily. To do this 🇨🇦 and 🇺🇸 should enter into long term military, Energy, resource, manufacturing and technology initiatives to compete with BRICS nations before it’s too late. We must get both our nation’s borders and immigration under control and Instill a competitive and extremely hard work ethic in our society I also advise everyone reading this to prepare for the worst, prepare for it now and pray that war does not escalate globally. Canada’s embarrassingly reckless govt and its incredibly petty goals leave me feeling the danger to our nation to be extremely high after watching this interview Is Putin a good guy? Bad guy? I leave that to the reader but I say this with all seriousness, 🇺🇸 and 🇨🇦 are going down unless we change course immediately in almost every aspect of our culture.

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

FYI @RealAndyLeeShow @SheilaGunnReid @AndrewLawton @Yanky_Pollak my first attempt at “journalism”

@YukonStrong — Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Posted - October 19, 2023 at 8:14 PM

Saved - October 21, 2023 at 1:22 AM

@YukonStrong - Yukon Strong 🇨🇦🇺🇸

⚡️Team Trudeau wants to kill newborns⚡️ Unfortunately, it looks like rumors about legalizing MAID for children with defects and illnesses up to one year old were true. 🇨🇦 is now a global leader in organ harvesting. #cdnpoli https://t.co/IurvCZg1lK