reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @Zeteticzz

Saved - June 3, 2024 at 1:06 PM

@Zeteticzz - Ƶ𝐞TⒺ𝓉𝐢C

https://t.co/e0kDi8zG9G

Saved - June 2, 2024 at 7:38 PM

@Zeteticzz - Ƶ𝐞TⒺ𝓉𝐢C

Wait till the masses find out the secret ingredient that keeps them coming back for more 🤮 I hope you don't eat this garbage. https://t.co/1agLsRBJun

Saved - May 9, 2024 at 11:06 PM

@Zeteticzz - Ƶ𝐞TⒺ𝓉𝐢C

oops 😆 https://t.co/4S0nXetjAP

Saved - May 6, 2024 at 6:11 PM

@Zeteticzz - Ƶ𝐞TⒺ𝓉𝐢C

Jeff Bezos - what do you see? 🧐 https://t.co/q1qpH6tPq6

Saved - April 9, 2024 at 1:57 PM

@Zeteticzz - Ƶ𝐞TⒺ𝓉𝐢C

Aether - the 5th element Einstein - the Jesuit fraud https://t.co/m3ABLF0vWe

Video Transcript AI Summary
Einstein aimed to disprove the existence of the ether, a substance believed to fill the universe. The ether was associated with explaining reality and was accessible to all. The ether, also known as quintessence, was considered the 5th element in ancient and medieval science. Despite Einstein's efforts, the idea of the ether has been largely forgotten and suppressed. Interestingly, the word "Earth" is an anagram for ether, leading to speculation about its significance. Additionally, the precursor to AOL Messenger was called Aimna, which stood for ether intelligent messaging network architecture.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As we all probably know by now, Einstein's main objective with his relativity theories, and I stress the word theories, was to eliminate the well known and documented idea that there was a substance, the ether, that permeated everything and everyone on this earth, and was pivotal in trying to explain the true nature of our reality. This was obviously not what the elite controllers wanted, as the ether was, and still is, absolutely free to access if one has the right equipment. By the way, the word equipment also includes you, yourself. But what is the ether? Let's look at its definition in WikiLeaks Believe It or Not. According to ancient and medieval science, ether was also called quintessence, meaning the 5th element, and is the material that fills the region of the universe above the terrestrial sphere. That's the Spaceball's definition. So since Einstein's nefarious masonic ramblings were published in 190 5, the idea of an ether has been relegated to the dark and dusty corner of historical failed research, and subsequently intentionally forgotten and suppressed. Or was it? By no coincidence, the plane or planet we live on is named Earth, an anagram for ether. Now why would the ancients find it so important to name the place we live on after something that doesn't exist? Did you know that AOL, America Online's precursor to Messenger, was called Aimna, a I m n a, which stands for ether intelligent messaging network architecture.
Saved - April 8, 2024 at 6:53 PM

@Zeteticzz - Ƶ𝐞TⒺ𝓉𝐢C

Keep your eyes peeled 🧐 https://t.co/rL2rrAP67T

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are live with the solar telescope showing the sun with Mercury passing by. Solar astronomer Bob Berman shares interesting facts about Mercury. There is a second sun to the right of the sun, usually hidden from view by organizations like NASA.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here we are with the live use in the solar telescope just behind me. It's what SLU members are gonna watch every single day from now on. And, you can see there the sun is on the left. You can see the small black dot, which is just to the right of center of the sun. That is the tiny orb of Mercury. Mercury, you now know so many interesting and fascinating facts from solar astronomer, Bob Berman. You'll be able to tell all your friends. Now you may be asking yourself, what is that large round thing to the right of the sun? Well, that's our second sun. I don't know if you knew that we had a second sun, but, there it is. It's normally hidden from view. NASA and other organizations, they usually hide that stuff away from us. They don't tell us the truth. But, you know, there is. It's true.
Saved - March 24, 2024 at 3:26 PM

@Zeteticzz - Ƶ𝐞TⒺ𝓉𝐢C

https://t.co/DB41fletZF

Saved - February 29, 2024 at 3:54 PM

@Incogni17422663 - Ƶ𝐞TⒺ𝓉𝐢C

"Just another conspiracy theory Flerf!" https://t.co/XtEAyeeGL5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Geoengineering technologies like stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) could help combat global climate change by reflecting the sun's heat. SAI is cost-effective at $10 billion annually, but challenges include the need for greenhouse gas reductions alongside SAI to address all climate change effects. Additionally, SAI could cause geopolitical tensions by altering weather patterns and benefiting some regions over others. Lack of global norms and standards further complicates the deployment of SAI and other geoengineering initiatives. Translation: Geoengineering technologies, such as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), have the potential to combat global climate change by reflecting the sun's heat. SAI is cost-effective at $10 billion annually, but challenges include the need for greenhouse gas reductions alongside SAI to address all climate change effects. Additionally, SAI could cause geopolitical tensions by altering weather patterns and benefiting some regions over others. The lack of global norms and standards further complicates the deployment of SAI and other geoengineering initiatives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another example is the array of technologies often referred to collectively as geoengineering. That potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection or SAI. A method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun's heat in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do. An SAI program could limit global temperature increases reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. This process is also relatively inexpensive. The National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10,000,000,000 yearly. As promising as it may be, moving forward on SAI would also raise a number of challenges for our government and for the international community. On the technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAI to address other climate change effects such as ocean acidification because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. On the geopolitical side, the technology's potential to alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions of the world at the expense of other regions could trigger sharp opposition by some nations. Others might seize on SAIs benefits and back away from their commitment to carbon dioxide reductions. And as with other breakthrough technologies, global norms and standards are lacking to guide the deployment and implementation of SAI and other geoengineering initiatives.
Saved - February 28, 2024 at 9:23 PM

@Incogni17422663 - Ƶ𝐞TⒺ𝓉𝐢C

Given that Eclipses are an absolute 💩show in the 🌏model, we need to consider previous understandings and observations from ancient civilizations. Black Sun, transparent celestial bodies? Thoughts? https://t.co/psuXb90zNc

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ancient civilizations mentioned other celestial bodies in the sky, like during solar eclipses when the moon isn't visible. Some believe the eclipse isn't caused by the moon but by unseen celestial bodies. The idea of a "black sun" has been linked to ancient symbols, possibly representing hidden celestial bodies. There may be more suns and moons beyond Antarctica, but they are unseen. The true nature of these celestial bodies remains a mystery.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All ancient civilizations spoke about other bodies, other lights in the sky that may or may not be visible to us at any given time. It's crazy though when you see solar eclipse, you don't see the moon at all. I remember as a kid, like, where's the moon now? And it's like you just see this black circle, and then everything goes back to normal, it seems like. Speaker 1: It's like, Speaker 0: that what the heck just happened? Speaker 1: On the total eclipse of the sun, the shadow that the moon casts on the earth is only 70 miles wide. That is impossible. But then they come up with umbra and penumbra, and it's just up to confuse your mind. We have a infinitely far sun sending diagonal rays from the side and straight rays from the middle where they cross each other. It makes absolutely no sense. Speaker 2: I went live a few years ago on YouTube during the 2018 eclipse in the United States, on a live event, and we were all waiting for the moon to actually show up, to cause this elliptical, this eclipse. And all we found was no moon showed So that blew my mind to think that there was actually no moon visible, yet this this effect of the sun literally being covered by an object I had witnessed. Speaker 1: Why can't we see the moon next to the sun. Now people say, well, it's because the sun is so bright. When the moon is totally eclipsing the sun, you should be able to see the features on the moon. You should be able to with a regular camera, with your regular eyes, with an infrared camera, but it has never been seen. There's only been anti flutter. There is that will fake an image and fade it into a picture of the eclipse. There's no video of it. Think about what an amazing video would be if they could film it from the International Space Station or from the moon itself. Never happens because I don't believe it's the moon that we see is what's eclipsing the sun. There's lots of ancient mythology about other dark bodies. Speaker 2: There could be, anomalous bodies out there. They're not actually visible to us. Speaker 3: A celestial body that we perhaps can't see because, you know, there's no on the the spectrum of light, there's only we can only see 1% of all the light rays, gamma rays, x rays. We can't see these certain frequencies and energies and lights. What happens is the sun is eclipsed by the so called moon, but it's not the moon. It's actually the north node. There's been, you know, times documented in the past where there's, you know, this eclipse. The moon's supposed to be eclipsed, and then there's no moon anywhere in the sky. Nowhere. Anywhere. And that that makes absolutely no sense. So there's gotta be another celestial body. The oldest ancient symbols, and it's the black sun. A celestial body that we perhaps can't see. Speaker 0: A lot of ancient civilizations always spoke about a black sun. It's like, why are they talking about a black sun for 100 if not 1000 of years? And that information now has turned into all the black sun is an evil thing. It's like, well yeah, of course, that's what they're selling it. They're selling it to you as an evil thing to stay away from it. They already don't want you to like the real sun in the sky. They push it so far away. They they want you to not care about it. There's a reason that's close to you. There's a reason that it's here for us. There might be more suns and moons on the outskirts of Antarctica. The outer lands. There might be more suns and moons. There might be more suns and moons in our world here, but we just can't see it.
Saved - February 27, 2024 at 9:27 AM

@Incogni17422663 - Ƶ𝐞TⒺ𝓉𝐢C

I find this to be incredibly intriguing - what did he find? https://t.co/RXAADi3uzx

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the 1990s, while filming in the Gulf of Mexico for Blue Planet, I discovered a strange underwater phenomenon. It appeared as a dark band that turned out to be a ring of mussels surrounding a black center. The water was so dense and saline that our submarine couldn't descend into it, causing ripples when we tried. It was a surreal experience unlike anything I had ever seen before.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the strangest places on the ocean's floor was only just discovered in the 19 nineties. I might agree Without a doubt, one of the most amazing things that I have ever seen in the bottom of the ocean. It was while filming for blue planets in the Gulf of Mexico. And I noticed there's something out in the distance. Couldn't tell exactly what, but it looked like a dark band. And as we approached it, the dark band became a donut. I saw this donut. It was black in the center. What the heck is that? And so as we get closer and closer to it, I noticed that the black band had what appeared to be kind of steam over it. And then I looked and there was water lapping against the shore. This band was with a ring of mussels. And inside the ring of mussels from the lake, it was like, wait a minute. We're not already underwater. And it's like, wait a minute. I'm already underwater. We went out over the water in this lake and tried to descend it, and that stopped. It was so super saline and dense that the submarine couldn't go down it. We literally bounced off. And as we bounced off, we sent ripples heading back to the shoreline. This is insane. I've never seen anything like that.
Saved - February 16, 2024 at 1:53 AM

@Incogni17422663 - Ƶ𝐞TⒺ𝓉𝐢C

👀👀

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

REPORT: Iran has claimed ownership over Antarctica and plans to build a military operation in the South Pole. The announcement is a direct challenge to the Antarctic Treaty which bans military activity on the continent. “We have property rights in the South Pole. We have a plan to raise our flag there and carry out military and scientific work,” said Iranian Navy Commander Rear Admiral Shahram Irani. “Our scientists are getting ready for a joint operation, encompassing the efforts of all our people, in keeping with the guidelines of our Leader.” He suggested that they have plans to have a permanent base on the continent. The video below is the White Desert in Antarctica.

Saved - January 30, 2024 at 5:44 PM

@Incogni17422663 - Ƶ𝐞TⒺ𝓉𝐢C

'gravity' 😏 https://t.co/UIDzpbtMjJ

Saved - January 11, 2024 at 8:53 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

Good morning 😎 https://t.co/DCBon5KXIe

Saved - January 8, 2024 at 9:53 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

Do you understand how ridiculous this is? https://t.co/nPthccnQKE

Saved - December 21, 2023 at 10:14 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

Seasons on a Globe 🤣😭😂 https://t.co/32AxZ9kyT9

Saved - December 18, 2023 at 3:05 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

Nikola Tesla told us Electromagnetism was the aether being thrown into motion, alluding to the relationship between magnetisn and an electric field. https://t.co/vGrSS18E3P

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the concept of constructive and destructive interference in magnets. They explain that magnets do not have poles, but rather the inverse of counter space, which is force and motion. The speaker zooms in on a magnet and points out concentric circles, which represent the interplay between the magnetic and dielectric fields. They compare this pattern to a lotus blossom or a dream catcher. The speaker also mentions that more powerful magnets have smaller spatial magnetic fields.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of course, the way the contrast, you can actually see rings along the, looks like an owl's face, doesn't it? This is the secret of mother nature here. This is the actual construct in destructive interference. Here's 1 pole, here's another pole, a magnet doesn't actually have poles. What it has is the inverse of counter space, which is specifically force and motion. See centrifugal divergent magnetic field, which of course is not literally being emitted from the magnet. It's literally the ether itself under polarized deformation from the field of the point source singularity that is and what defines the magnet, because a magnet is not defined by what is quantitative rather by what is qualitative. And I've explained this a 1000 times, and also to including my book. I'll show you 1 pole of the magnet here. Let's zoom in. Sorry about that shaky video. But if you, if I zoom in here, you can actually see little concentric circles in the middle. Now you notice how small the black spot is? Of course, where it's black is a dielectric. This is constructive and destructive interference between the magnetic and the dielectric. This is literally the lotus blossom. It kind of looks like a lotus blossom, doesn't it? But specifically from up above it looks like a dream catcher. It's a hypertrochoidal pattern of constructive and destructive of interference. So that was the interplay between magnetic and dielectric, because magnetism is the dielectric field. Let me give you the perfect analogy, and this is destructive to the supercell, is this really powerful N 60 Gauss magnet. People don't understand that actually a more powerful magnet actually has smaller spatial magnetic field. The reason being, and, the only kind of good analogy
Saved - December 12, 2023 at 10:10 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

@MrAnderson3417 Nah, Y'all are r3tarded with your head in the sand. https://t.co/3SCw4b7mMt

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that our history is a lie and introduces the concept of the Tartarians, an advanced race who built buildings to obtain free energy. They suggest that these buildings are wrongly attributed to different architectural styles, and the true history has been falsified. The theory proposes that a powerful organization opposed Tartaria as it threatened their control over energy sales. This organization supposedly destroyed Tartaria and erased their existence from history. However, evidence still exists in the form of buildings and structures that share a common theme of energy harvesting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our history is all a lie. Ever heard of the Tartarians? Well, they were a unified and advanced race of people who built extremely well crafted buildings like this, and they designed them in order to obtain free energy from the atmosphere. These style of buildings are everywhere, yet people attribute them to design and architecture styles, and the history and true meaning of them has been falsified by someone or something that doesn't want us to know about it. There is so much more to the story. Think about it. What happened? If we did actually build these, then how have we gone so far downhill? Well, the theory goes that there was already a powerful organization that controlled the world through the sale of energy and had already heavily invested into energy production. They were completely against Tartaria because free energy would be the end of any control that they had. So they tore Tartaria apart and erased them from our history, making it seem like Tartaria never existed. But if you dig deep, there is still a load of evidence that proves their existence. Just look at all these buildings and architectural structures that seem to advance to have been built by the respective nations. Funny enough, all of these respective nations. Funny enough, all of these structures have a common theme, harvesting energy.
Saved - December 8, 2023 at 12:56 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

Overtly pissing our money away while lying to the Public. They didn't go to the Moon then and they won't be in future either. https://t.co/QRgVRuARYV

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1969, the United States sent someone to the moon, but since then, the trend has been a decline in space exploration. When people say they want to go into space, they usually mean they want to go into orbit. However, only the Apollo astronauts have left Earth for a destination beyond low Earth orbit. Most astronauts have only gone into low Earth orbit, where the space station is located. Currently, we can only fly in Earth orbit, but there are plans to test systems for exploration beyond low Earth orbit in the next decade. NASA has faced issues with losing expensive equipment, but they are aware of the problem and aim to improve. The technology to go to the moon again has been destroyed and needs to be rebuilt. There is also uncertainty about the whereabouts of telemetry data.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1969, we were able to send somebody to the moon. 1969, then we had the the space shuttle. The the space shuttle could only take people to low Earth orbit. Then the space shuttle retired, and United States could take no one to orbit. So that's the trend. The trend is, like, down to nothing. Speaker 1: Gotta get this off my chest right now. When people say they wanna go into space, I wanna go what do they typically mean by that? Speaker 2: I mean, I'm gonna be Astronaut, I'm gonna be I'm going into space, man. I'm going up there. I'm going up there. Speaker 1: Up there. And generally, I mean, they wanna go into orbit. Right? Most now Anyone who has ever been in space Speaker 2: They don't mean that. They wanna go to space, man. Speaker 1: Well well, okay. If that's the case, do you know how many people have left lower orbit? Apollo astronauts Okay. K, that left Earth, right, to go to the moon. Speaker 2: Alright. And that's that's space. Speaker 1: Those are the only people who have ever left Earth for a destination. That's cool. Every other astronaut, hundreds of them Speaker 2: Uh-huh. Speaker 1: Are called astronauts, and we still say they went into space. And what that means is they went into low earth orbit. Speaker 2: Oh, that's just awful. I mean, so Speaker 1: low earth orbit is in practice where the space station is, it's about a couple of 100 miles up. So so it's so the distance From earth's surface to the space station is less than the distance from New York City to Washington, D. C. Speaker 2: Oh, oh, God. Why are you depressing me? Like, I'm just trying I'm just trying to be honest Speaker 3: about this. Speaker 2: This is awful. Okay? Speaker 3: Right now, we only can fly in Earth orbit. That's the farthest that we can go. Speaker 4: The kinds of technologies that we're testing out on space station are definitely helping us with Our goals of going beyond low Earth orbit. Speaker 1: Early in the next decade, a set of crewed flights will test and prove the systems required for exploration beyond low Earth orbit. Speaker 4: And this is really the beginning, I think, of human beings leaving low Earth orbit. Speaker 5: They can put a man on the moon, but they can't keep track of the equipment they use to do it. That's according to NASA reports obtained by the I team. Kennedy Space Center employees report just last year, nearly $500,000 of high-tech items simply vanished, like this one, a digital video recorder valued at $100,000. Here's another one, 11 radios lost, price, $35,000, and a high-tech wave reflectometer went missing in 2008. That's another $15,000. NASA officials say they're aware of the problem. We need to do a better job Speaker 3: of keeping track of it, obviously, and we know that. We wanna do a better job Speaker 2: most of Speaker 5: the missing items are computers, TVs, and radio equipment. Don't spend your time tracking computers and not launching spaceships. I mean, there's you need to be launching spaceships. So all that lost equipment still adds up to half a $1,000,000 the taxpayers paid for. Speaker 6: I'd go to the moon in a nano the problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to, but we, destroyed that technology and, no, it's a painful process to build it back again. Speaker 3: I haven't, seen anything that indicates the telemetry data is even Understand. As I said, even if we had it, we don't have machines to play it back. I right. We we've been unable to to to track it down. I mean, we don't know, where this this telemetry data ended up. And we don't know the what path it may have taken. So unfortunately, I'm afraid I can't really give you much of a clue as to as to where this data ended up and whether it still exists or not. Speaker 6: And
Saved - December 4, 2023 at 4:51 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

We are easily fooled. https://t.co/8121yRIkWd

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tonight, we will make a good bed. Yes, we could do more. There will be more coming from Monday onwards.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ach so. Ja. Ja. Guten Bett. Machen heute Abend hier. Ja, wir könnten noch. So, es kommen noch dicker. Ab Montag.
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 7:42 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

They lyin to you .. just sayin https://t.co/u9DQd3sGb5

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that our history is a lie and introduces the concept of the Tartarians, an advanced race of people who built impressive structures. They argue that these buildings have been falsely attributed to other architectural styles, and the true history behind them has been hidden. The speaker suggests that a powerful organization opposed Tartaria because their free energy technology threatened their control. This organization supposedly destroyed Tartaria and erased their existence from history. However, the speaker believes there is still evidence of Tartaria's existence in the form of these buildings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our history is all a lie. Ever heard of the Tartarians? Well, they were a unified and advanced race of people who built atmosphere. These style of buildings are everywhere, ex yet people attribute them to design and architecture styles, and the history and true meaning of them has been falsified by someone or something that doesn't want us to know about it. Ex there is so much more to the story. Think about it. What happened? If we did actually build these, then how have we gone so far downhill? Ex well, the theory goes that there was already a powerful organization that controlled the world through the sale of energy and had already heavily invested into energy production. They were completely against Tartaria because free energy would be the end of any control that they had. So they tore Tartoria apart and erased them from our history, making it seem like Tartoria never existed. But if you dig deep, ex there is still a load of evidence that proves their existence. Just look at all these buildings and architectural structures ex that seemed to advance to have been built by the respective nations. Funny enough, all of these structures have a common
Saved - November 29, 2023 at 5:02 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

The Pseudo scientists tell you that 'comets', are massive Ice particles that begin to melt as they pass near the sun. 🤡🌎 Go search up 'comet time lapse' on YT - you will see exactly what is being mentioned in this video, 👏every 👏single 👏time https://t.co/IxkwUb3EwU

Video Transcript AI Summary
NASA claims that the Earth spins at 1000 miles per hour on its axis and orbits the sun at 67,000 miles per hour, while the sun moves at 570,000 miles per hour within our galaxy. However, if this were true, the constellations in the night sky would constantly change. Instead, the stars appear to move in circular motions around our flat, stationary Earth, with Polaris as the fixed point at the North Pole. Comets, said to be melting ice particles, are also questioned. Time-lapse footage of the comet NEOWISE suggests that it is not actually moving independently but is fixed in its position on the firmament, possibly revealing an opening in the firmament itself.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: NASA tells us that our globe is spinning at a 1000 miles per hour on its axis at 67,000 miles per hour around the sun, which is then traveling at 570,000 miles per hour within our galaxy. Speaker 1: If this was truly the case, then we would not see the same constellations in the same places in the night sky. The night sky would be completely random and perpetually changing But it isn't. As we've seen, the stars above us, attached somehow to a great, immense and Asterious firmament travel in circular motions around our flat, stationary earth with Polaris, or what we call the northern star, a fixed unmoving point in the center and above the center of our earth at the north pole. We've been told that comets are huge ice particles that, when passing within the distance of our sun, begin to melt which causing them to release gas and create a trail and tail. They tell us that comets can travel a 100,000 miles an hour, But they are lying again. Here is time lapse footage of the recent comet, NEOWISE. As you can see, the comet is not actually moving in its own path. It is fixed in its area on the firmament and moving in conjunction with the rest of the stars. There is no traveling comet Journeying at a 100,000 miles per hour. But look closer. Can you not see it? It is a large opening in the firmament, casting a ray of light from whatever exists behind and through the water beneath it. Much like you see with the light entering in an underwater cave opening deep in the ocean.
Saved - November 28, 2023 at 11:12 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

@tactical2cat Ya, cool looking see through rock... I see you shill ..with your burner account https://t.co/cCoHoBSPJu

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions if the person is their partner and accuses them of always lying. They express frustration but also acknowledge that they find the person's lies entertaining.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's your girl? Golly. Okay. I see you. But I just wanna know one thing. You ready? Why the fuck you lying? Why you always lying? Yeah. I know you're lying. But you sound exciting. And you know that I know that you're lying.
Saved - November 28, 2023 at 11:48 AM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

115,000 feet .. Flaaaaattt https://t.co/ltTdxsNJjg

Saved - November 27, 2023 at 7:29 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

I find this interesting. 👀🤔 https://t.co/QCU91SVecP

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker reveals that the new world capital is located in Astana, Kazakhstan. They highlight the city's progress and unique architectural features, such as freemasonry pillars and a pyramid-shaped building. The speaker speculates on the symbolism behind these structures, including references to the World Cup trophy and the sun. They also mention the presence of owls and suggest a connection to Moloch. The speaker then focuses on a large bird, possibly a phoenix, flying towards a pyramid, which is called the Palace of Peace and Reconciliation. They note the presence of an evil eye symbol and a round table. The speaker concludes by suggesting the significance of this place and its importance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So guys, I got the answer to the question you guys have all been asking yourselves. So where is the new world or a capital gonna be? Is it gonna be New York City, Paris, you know, Beijing? Where? I know the answer. Let's see. Kazakhstan. Very nice. Yeah. I'm sorry. That was cringey, but I had to do it. Okay. Let's let's I'll show you. It's it's It's really not like this anymore. Let's look. Check it out. That's Astana, Kazakhstan. In 1999, it actually looked a lot like Borat, But in 2012, they made quite a bit of progress. Look. They they added a couple freemasonry pillars, a pyramid on a building, maybe a World Cup trophy. We should probably take a closer look. Woah. Check it out. That's pretty impressive. Kinda looks like Vegas at night. Maybe that is a World Cup trophy, or maybe it's a big monument to the sun? Or maybe the World Cup trophy is a monument to the sun too. We should probably look in the daytime. Woah. Check it out. Check out the owls. Is that on Moloch? Give me a minute. I'm sure it's probably Moloch. You got you got the big freemasonry towers right there, pillars. Probably once to the sun, once to the moon. Got big ones. It's like a White House in the middle of it. You know, fountains, you know, it's very very pretty. Very pretty. Let's let's look some more. Woah. Yeah. That's a big bird. I think that's a phoenix, and we know that phoenix rise rise from ashes. I wonder what's gonna be in ashes when that phoenix rises. I got I got a few ideas. It's flying toward a what looks to be a a pyramid. Yeah. That's definitely in a pyramid. Let's take a closer look. Yeah. That's definitely a pyramid. Little. Yeah. I mean, exactly what it is. It's actually called the Palace of Peace and Reconciliation. When they say peace and safety, you know what happens. Let's take a look inside. There you go. You knew there's an evil eye somewhere. Yeah. An eye with the with the sunburst right around it and a big round table. I guess that's where Sauron's telling them all what to do. Yeah. That's pretty interesting. Right? Yeah. They're not hiding anything Maybe it's both. Either way, pretty cool. Definitely cool. So yeah. You guys probably hadn't seen this place before, have you? I have a feeling it's kind of important. One thing
Saved - November 24, 2023 at 7:50 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

So much to unpack. If you've never seen this, I guarantee you will watch it several times. https://t.co/uxAG7iNzXp

Saved - November 24, 2023 at 5:56 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

Good morning Friends Rupes Nigra Which translates to 'Black Rock' Where have you heard that before? 🤔 A large Magnetic rock, aligned with a fixed Polaris North Star. A river watering the garden flowered from Eden, from there it was separated into four headwaters - Genesis 2:10

Saved - November 24, 2023 at 11:02 AM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

Sonoluminescence is a phenomenon from imploding bubbles in a liquid when excited by sound, emits light. 'Sono' is sound 'Luminescence' is light https://t.co/76mKiEUFzv

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker briefly mentions that the Bible states that the stars are fixed in the firmament. They conclude by thanking the viewers for watching.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now like the Bible says, the stars are fixed in the firmament. So there you have seen it, simple proof that the stars Thanks for watching.
Saved - November 23, 2023 at 3:47 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

'Trust Me' 😂😅 https://t.co/AF8NBakCjL

@Cyanadontay - Human being

@EbenezerPrime @TheGree53716841 @Incogni17422663 I have sent a weather balloon up, trust me, I wish I could go amount the stars and explore

Saved - November 23, 2023 at 3:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Discovering lies can be disorienting, like entering a new world where truths are rearranged. Emotions range from disbelief to anger, with a sense of betrayal or loss. Questioning everything, reevaluating beliefs, and seeking new perspectives lead to a deeper understanding of truth's complexities and a more discerning approach to information.

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

Discovering the lies around you can feel like a veil slowly lifting, revealing a reality starkly different from what you once believed. Initially, it's disorienting, like stepping into a new world where truths are rearranged. Emotions can range from disbelief to anger, and there might be a sense of betrayal or loss. It's a process of questioning everything you thought you knew, reevaluating beliefs, and seeking new perspectives. Ultimately, it will lead you to a deeper understanding of the complexities of truth and a more critical, discerning approach to information.

Saved - November 23, 2023 at 2:53 AM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

It's 🌏🤥tipping over, quickly. Be part of the acceleration of #Flatearth Truth! https://t.co/DSs6S4sY27

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are many flat Earthers who are still in the closet, including some big channels. People with large platforms know the truth about the globe but are afraid to admit it. Eventually, the conversation will tip over and everyone will be talking about it. Flat Earthers are not decreasing in numbers, but rather the globe believers are. To keep people from understanding, there is immense censorship and psychological operations. Many people find the Flat Earth conversation interesting and want to investigate further. Once the conversation is more widespread, more people will be open about it. Change is coming, and there are plans to shake things up.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Know how many people are flat Earthers, but they're in the closet? Do you know how many huge channels are flat Earthers, but they won't say it? Do you know how many people with huge platforms know they lied about the globe, but they're afraid to come out and say it? When this starts to tip over, you're gonna wake up one day and everyone's gonna be talking about it. I don't know W how exactly it's going to happen. And all I can do is everything I can to accelerate that. But it's gonna happen. It's going to happen for sure. You've been saying that you guys have been saying that for so long. Really? Because I don't think I have been. I have, I mean, Yeah, I know that eventually it's going to get there. It's very close. K. Believe it or not, Flat Earthers don't decrease in numbers. It is the globe that is drastically decreasing in numbers and requires immense censorship, Strawmans, obfuscation, gaslighting, psychological operations, jade trig, all kinds of crazy psyops to keep you away from understanding it. Do you know how many people would say, I have to admit the Flat Earth conversation is very interesting. I don't know all about it. I haven't made my mind up yet, but I'm not gonna lie. There are a lot of interesting stuff here. I have a lot to still investigate. I was Not fully aware of all the details of this conversation. It isn't as simple as you think. They have lots of good points over there. Okay? Do you know how many of those people are like, they're, they're gonna be more open about it once the conversation is out everywhere? See, It's like people, it's just human nature. People are afraid to say it right now. It's about to change. It's gonna change. And I've got some Pretty big things planned myself that I think will actually significantly shake that up.
Saved - November 22, 2023 at 3:23 AM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

F̸̠͈̤̔̄̇͒͜͝ļ̶̢̼̝͇̟̗̒̀̒̀͝ǎ̷̢̹͈̻͔̹͇̝̑͜ẗ̴̺̬̳̠͓́̾̃̒͌̃̀ ̵̡̡̲͕̀͗̍͑̓͛̔̅̾Ę̷͖̼̟̘̈͋̒̌̀̓͌̐a̷̡̨̱̟̗̹̰̓̕r̷̭̹̺̟̼̦̘̙̒͆̓̓͌̇̈́͘̕͝t̸̤̅͊͑͌͠ḥ̶̡͉̰̣͚̱̌̑̀̉̅̀͝ https://t.co/hgRX4RdwzK

Saved - November 21, 2023 at 1:02 AM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

They have been telling you your entire life ... are you getting it yet? https://t.co/psi1ow2loL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pixar's short film "Knickknack" takes viewers on a journey through various locations where knickknacks wear sunglasses. The story then shifts to Nome, Alaska, where a character resides at the edge of the world, Antarctica. He attempts to escape by drilling and blowing up the edge, reminiscent of real-life operations like Operation Deep Freeze and Operation Fishbowl. The film caught the attention of Walt Disney, who has since released every Pixar movie. Disney Studios filmed Operation Deep Freeze, and Walt Disney himself witnessed the discovery of the firmament. This is represented in the Magic Kingdom logo, featuring a firmament and a tower reaching towards it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 6 years prior to the release of Toy Story, Pixar released a short film called Knickknack. They showed you hot location after hot location or all the knickknacks have on sunglasses. Then they take you to a land far away towards the edge of the JELF. They call it Nome Alaska, but they make the pun gnome sweet gnome showing you that this is your home. This character is not wearing sunglasses because he's at the edge of the world where the sun barely reaches the coldest place on Earth, Antarctica. He finds the edge just like we did in Operation Deep Freeze. Then he proceeds to drill just like they did in Russia. Then he tries to blow it up just like we did over the Pacific Ocean. Again, symbolizing the edge of the known world. And what was the name of the operation we were trying to explode the firmament? Operation Fishbowl. And we see here how if he actually did escape from his home sweet home beyond the firmament, he would be in water. Pixar obviously got the attention of Walt Disney in this short little film because Disney Studios has released every single Pixar movie. After all, Disney Studios filmed Operation Deep Freeze. And Walt Disney is an honorary member because he was there when they found the firmament of heaven and Where It Meets the Earth. This is commemorated in his logo of the Magic Kingdom depicting a firmament And a tower whose top would reach
Saved - November 20, 2023 at 9:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Here are some recommended Twitter accounts to follow: @XposeTheNose, @BrockRiddickIFB, @TheGlobeIsDead, @My_TeslaModelS, @thejspaceonx, @TedLogan1010, @GhostGone420, @Kaleb5D, @TheFlatEartherr, @RobotPolisher, @BillyZigouras, @CryptoStu3, @100KryptoKeyz, @No_Curve, @BillSEsquire_11, @levelheadzHQ, @JasonBjorn5, @AntiDisinfo86, @Sniper0fTruth, @ornery_owls, @maththfcx, @SheepDogLegend, @ErwinJanssens4, @BiffDon, @EscanorReloaded, @race002, @JumzyRau, @idropFbombs, @truthscant, @sergioa94679493, @NotOpCue, @lyingclowns, @Casper101Susie, @jacwiljam, @ken_caudle, @Earstohearyou, @Death6102, @ThatGuyM88, @space_audits, @KingpGodzilla33, @RevealingDaniel, @crrow777.

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

Some of my recommended follows 👇🏼 @XposeTheNose@BrockRiddickIFB@TheGlobeIsDead@My_TeslaModelS@thejspaceonx@TedLogan1010@GhostGone420@Kaleb5D@TheFlatEartherr@RobotPolisher@BillyZigouras@CryptoStu3@100KryptoKeyz@No_Curve@BillSEsquire_11@levelheadzHQ@JasonBjorn5@AntiDisinfo86@Sniper0fTruth@ornery_owls@maththfcx@SheepDogLegend@ErwinJanssens4@BiffDon@EscanorReloaded@race002@JumzyRau@idropFbombs@truthscant@sergioa94679493@NotOpCue@lyingclowns@Casper101Susie@jacwiljam@ken_caudle@Earstohearyou@Death6102@ThatGuyM88@space_audits@KingpGodzilla33@RevealingDaniel@crrow777

Saved - November 20, 2023 at 2:38 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

Heliocentrisim has its foundation from religious cults that worshipped the sun. It took them 2000 years to reverse engineer reality with their pseudoscience math. https://t.co/Zwnf5vw8aV

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the heliocentric model was created to place the sun at the center of the universe, as a form of sun worship disguised as science. They argue that to achieve this, the sun was made much larger than the earth, despite appearing small from our perspective. Additionally, the sun was placed 93,000,000 miles away to support the model. The speaker believes that all the facts and explanations surrounding the heliocentric model were reverse engineered to fit this ultimate goal, and that it is not based on reality or truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everything with this model has been reverse engineered from the truth. The ultimate goal from the beginning was to place the sun at the center of the universe. They want the sun at the center as they are sun worshippers. Heliocentrism is simply modern day sun worship sun masquerading as a science. So their goal from the beginning was to put the sun at the center. So how do you do this? Well, the first thing you have to do is you have to make the sun much larger than the earth. For the earth to orbit the sun, the sun's gonna have to be much larger than the earth. So they made the sun sun over 1,000,000 times larger than the earth. But when I stand on earth and I look at the sun, it looks no bigger than a quarter. So if the sun is over a1000000 times larger than the earth. How come I observe it no bigger than a quarter? So how do you explain this? Oh, well, that's because the sun is really far away. So since we We had to make the sun really big to place the sun at the center. Now we have to make the sun really far away. So let's make the sun 93,000,000 miles away. Every explanation has to be reverse engineered because they started with an ultimate goal of placing the sun at the center. Every other fact that they create is reverse engineered to make this work. This is exactly what happened in reality. All these men that we learned about who created the heliocentric model, they had to work selectively over the span of 2000 years to reverse engineer this model. This model comes from man. This model is built on perfected mathematics that has no relation to reality, no relation to the truth. It's simply a reverse engineered masterpiece. I chopped up.
Saved - November 19, 2023 at 2:41 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

Gravity is bullshit https://t.co/EwMRJg1Mlr

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that gravity is a misconception and that everything in the world is electric. They claim that electrostatics, the attraction between positive and negative charges, is the unifying force that holds everything together. They suggest that objects seek equilibrium based on their electric nature, and electrostatics is even stronger than gravity. They mention experiments using a corona motor to manipulate electrostatics and make objects levitate or change their weight. They assert that gravity is not caused by manipulating space-time but rather by electrostatics, as objects seek balance on the ground where their charge disperses.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As for this whole, like, gravity and nonsense about you need a force, there's something called a downward electric current on the earth. It's measurable. It's provable. So we have positive energy increasing above. It then goes down to the ground and seek equilibrium. This is, of course, from a Richard Feynman lecture right here explaining it. It's a grounded metal plate. We'll have the same surface charge as the earth. The plates face covered with the ground conductor. We'll have no surface charge. In the next level movie, actually, it's Level With Me. Check it out, levelwithmefilm.com. We actually did the experiment to show you can make things go up and down, manipulating prostatics, gravity's a fairy tale. Speaker 1: Electrostatics is a proven thing. We all know that a positive and a negative will attract towards each other. So the earth has a neutral or negative charge. Everything above it has a positive charge and it is attracted to it. Everything that exists is electric. There's not Speaker 0: one thing that exists in the entire world that is not electric. It's actually the unifying force that keeps everything here, holds everything together, And everything seeks equilibrium based on that. So everything's trying to find a state of rest based on its electric phenomena or its electric nature with in the environment that we exist within. And then when you start to look further into it, you find out that on the smallest scale, electrostatics It's significantly stronger than gravity is even claimed to be. Magnitude's greater. 10 to the 36 power to be specific. So everything simply put, everything that exists is electric. Everything that is falling to the ground or not falling to the ground It's seeking delivery based on electrostatics. We can actually test this. We can use something called a corona motor. And whenever we manipulate electrostatics, we can make things levitate. We can make things go up or down, and we can actually change how fast they go down. We can also manipulate the weight of an object simply by manipulating electrostatics. And, of course, that's how science actually works as you do an experiment that shows you what the cause of the effect is, and you can manipulate electrostatics and cause the effect of downward acceleration commonly referred to as gravity. Of course, I've never seen a test that manipulates space time, and you will never see that. It doesn't exist. Everyone thinks that the reason things fall is because Because of gravity, but actually everything that exists is electrostatic. So whenever things go to the ground, they're seeking equilibrium. So they go find their balance on the ground where their charge disperses or spreads out in through the ground. So we have positive charge in the air. We have negative charge
Saved - November 18, 2023 at 8:50 AM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

Can't wait to watch the splish splash show😏 https://t.co/yXJDzGh5LK

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Preparing for launch on Saturday https://t.co/gIpnubscWa

Saved - November 16, 2023 at 3:49 AM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

The ☀️and🌒are not hat they tell you they are. https://t.co/6uRHk1RPi1

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker demonstrates a configuration of magnets on a rail. They show how a superconductor can move without friction on the rail, levitating and rotating. The speaker explains that the amount of energy needed to move the disc is minimal due to the absence of friction. They also demonstrate how the disc can move below the rail when pinned upside down. The speaker emphasizes that this phenomenon is not classical physics but rather quantum levitation and locking in space.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's sound 1 rotate around flat earth. I have here a different configuration, a different set of magnets. I put on a rail in image magnetic field is the same along this rail. So the superconductor will move without any friction on this rail. Let's see if it works. I'm going to cool it a little bit more and then I'm going to lock it on top of this rail and you see, it just levitates. If I had a 20 meters long rail, it would just go without any friction. The amount of energy I need to move this disc is minimal because there's no friction. If I take this circular rail, you see these are just 2 circles of magnets. And if I take the disc and put this on the rail, you see that it immediately starts moving. I give it a little push and that's enough. It will keep rotating until it warms up. So there's no friction at all. Now I can do the same thing on this rail, but upside down because again, this is not magnetic repulsion. So if I take this disc and pin it below the rail, it will just move below the rail. Again, forget everything you know. This is not classical physics. I forgot. Okay. So this is quantum levitation and quantum locking, locking in space. Right?
Saved - November 14, 2023 at 3:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
As a former military member, I realized the Moon landing was fake. My experiences in long range shooting, artillery, and gunner radar designator made me question the Heliocentric spell that deceives many.

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

I was a Globie in the Military as well. I had already determined the Moon landing was fake but had not pushed the thought further. When i reflect on my experiences in the Military, long range shooting, Artillery, gunner radar designator, I am reminded how easily the deception still has many under the Heliocentric spell.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, a former Navy member discusses his realization that all the equipment used in measuring sound in the Navy relies on the concept of a flat earth, even though it is not explicitly stated. He mentions that charts and radar charts are also based on a flat earth model. The speaker explains how sonar works, including the use of active and passive sonar. He highlights the existence of acoustic shadows, which can allow submarines to hide over the curve of the earth and remain undetected. The conversation concludes with the realization that this information is readily available and can be researched online.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: During my time in the Navy, it never once occurred to me that there'd be any other possibility that we would have to have lived on a ball earth. So, it wasn't in the purview of anyone around me, it was just never even something ever talked about. There's nothing in the literature that I read that told me one way or the other, but in hindsight, this is all in hindsight. It's only when I look back that I can tell you that everything that we've done to measure sound. Everything that we do right now, in the open market, things that I can talk about, you know, the actual passive acoustic equipment that's available or the active sonar equipment that's available. All of them do rely on the concept of a flat earth, even though they don't explicitly say that. There's even some specific equipment that I simply just can't talk about, but it really does only a hindsight. I realized this would only work if we're living in a flat environment. In fact, all of our charts were based off that. Speaker 1: Right. Yeah. And that doesn't surprise me at all because so were The radar charts that we worked off of. So in SONAR, obviously, if you're in a submarine or something like that, What kind of ranging did you have? I mean, how far away could you actually detect targets with the sonar? Speaker 0: Well, technically, you could hear a target for as far away as, say, 1,000 miles. Yeah, it's going to depend on so far, there is a channel. You might be familiar with this because the same thing exists in the troposphere, I think. I mean, in the atmosphere, there is a channel where the pressure causes sound to move slower than anywhere else, and underwater that's met through pressure, temperature, salinity. There's a, you know, an optimal curve there, which actually causes a slowdown of sound as sound passed through that so far channel. So that channel acts as a sort of an underwater internet for whales, for really anything. Anyone who wants to communicate underwater could pump their sound into that SOPHAR channel and it's going to travel for thousands of miles. To me, that alone is a flat earth proof. There is a consequence of sound being wrapped around a doughnut versus sound being able to just permeate straight. However, it's not exact enough where I've gotten in enough arguments with people where I can't just like flip this card over and go, see here. Perfect proof of that. So, that's just one element of underwater acoustics. There's really 2 types of sonar. There's an active sonar and a passive sonar. And so in active mode, you would be sending a pulse or a signal or an oscillation out from your transducer and then listening for the time it took for that pulse to get back, that would give you a very active, not only vector of where your target is, but more specifically, it would give you a distance and a range. And that's really is what's crucial, for underwater. Meanwhile, on passive side, all you can really do is detect a vector of where something's coming from. You can't really range it from there. But the primary meat, the stake that I'm bringing to this conversation is that there is something called acoustic shadows. And these acoustic shadows, I'm sure there's the same thing in the radar. There are radar shadows if you're hitting a direct target, anything behind that target is going to be blind. And it's just simply it would be the easiest thing in the world for, submarines to hide over the curve. I don't see how any they would ever be able to be found simply because they could stay low enough on the bottom where there's a hump of earth between them and the person trying to hunt them. Speaker 1: So, essentially, anything over say 10 to 15 miles, which would give you 60 to a 100 foot plus of curvature theoretically, that would they would be in that blind spot for the sonar. Speaker 0: Exactly. And what I'm quoting here, just to this is all standard. You can Google this and look it up. This is just, you know, how any kind of underwater submarine you would buy off the market, you know, their sonar equipment or if you were to build your own. This is just how transducers work. Yeah, there's going to be shadows you're going to be blind behind those shadows and a hill or a hump at the bottom would be that giant shadow. Speaker 1: Okay. Wow. You know, that's very interesting. I never thought about anything like that before.
Saved - November 13, 2023 at 11:52 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

The heliocentric lie is one that props up many of the other lies we have been told. It is evident that we live on a #flatearth motionless plane. That includes our history. #Tartaria Is a close second, if not the biggest cover-up, they have ever done. https://t.co/yteh9vpSjV

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Tartarians were an advanced race who built impressive buildings, but their existence has been hidden and falsified. There is evidence that they were erased from history by a powerful organization that controlled the world through energy sales. This organization feared the end of their control if Tartaria's free energy technology became known. Despite their efforts, evidence of Tartaria can still be found in various architectural structures. These structures, built by different nations, share common features that suggest an advanced civilization. Our history has been manipulated, and there is much more to uncover.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our history is all a lie. Ever heard of the Tartarians? Well, they were a unified and advanced race of people who built atmosphere. These style of buildings are everywhere, ex yet people attribute them to design and architecture styles, and the history and true meaning of them has been falsified by someone or something that doesn't want us to know about it. Ex there is so much more to the story. Think about it. What happened? If we did actually build these, then how have we gone so far downhill? Ex well, the theory goes that there was already a powerful organization that controlled the world through the sale of energy and had already heavily invested into energy production. They were completely against Tartaria because free energy would be the end of any control that they had. So they tore Tartoria apart and erased them from our history, making it seem like Tartoria never existed. But if you dig deep, ex there is still a load of evidence that proves their existence. Just look at all these buildings and architectural structures ex that seemed to advance to have been built by the respective nations. Funny enough, all of these structures have a common
Saved - November 12, 2023 at 12:54 AM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

The real bloodlines that rule the world 👇🏼 Zoroastrian Bloodlines 🩸 1. Aldobrandini 2. Borja 3. Breakspeare 4. Chigi 5. Colonna 6. Conti 7. Este 8. Farnese 9. Gaetani 10. Medici (Rockefeller) 11. Orsini (Rothschild) 12. Pamphili 13. Somaglia https://t.co/Vbe9mv46gZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the power dynamics of various families and organizations. They claim that the Orsini family, also known as the Rothschilds, are the most powerful and have connections to ancient bloodlines. They mention the Colonna and Farnese families as well. The speaker also suggests that the Jesuits are the top authority, with the Jewish Sanhedrin in collaboration with them. They assert that the Pentagon is owned by the Farnese family and discuss the influence of the Jesuits in various countries and organizations. The speaker concludes by stating that the Jesuits play both sides and co-opt grassroots movements.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Rothschilds come from the Orsini family. Roth means red in German and the Orsini means red, red bear, little red bears. That's what Orsini means. The Grey Pope is Pepe Orsini. He trumps the black, he trumps the white Pope. Speaker 1: The Grey Pope is even higher than the black Speaker 0: The Orsini is the Maxima family. They are the maximum family. They are on top. And somehow they've trumped the Colonna and the Farnese, which I know without any doubt through all my studies that they are the 3 most powerful illuminations. Speaker 1: What about Roth Down Rockefeller. Speaker 0: Well, they are Orsini, they just changed their name. Rockefeller were Rothschilds, Rothschilds were Orsini. Orsini were a family which have their blood lines in Babylon and Egypt. They tell you that. You read their biographies. They'll tell you that. We go back to Nimrod. They tell you that. The Rothschilds say that. We go back to Nimrod. How? Through the Orsini. So Rockefeller, Rothschild, Orsini And then you go back to the Persian and Egyptian Dynasties. Speaker 1: And what is the name of the top family? Speaker 0: Orsini would be on top now because they're called the Maxima. Speaker 1: The Maxima. The Orsini. Speaker 0: Then I would say under them would have to The colons, the colona, the Columbus Families or enterprise. I think it's an enterprise. I don't think they're even really families. It's the funds. It's the Venetian funds that they created. It's where all the money power is. And then the Farnezes. Some people say the Farnezes are the most powerful, that have researched because they actually created the Tuscan Empire. They created the 12 founding cities of the Etruscan Empire which, the Romans supposedly destroyed. But the theory is that they went down to Rome and created that as well. Speaker 1: Now why why do There's a lot of people out there who think, the Jews own the media. The Jews run the world. Look at everybody's last name. It's a Jewish last name. Is that just to, distract Make a boogie man? Yeah. Is that what that is? Speaker 0: Pretty much. Pretty much. Even though the Jewish Sanhedrin is made struck a deal with the Jesuits, I believe. So the Jesuits represent they are the military arm of the Vatican, which is Catholic and Catholic means universal. Hence, they're trying to claim that they are the universal Christian, Christendom base. So the Judaic base, which is the other monotheistic aberration, you know, monstrosity. They are the Jewish Sanhedrin. They are like the the cardinals of the Jews and and they are dark people and I'm sure they're in cahoots with the Jesuits who run everything. Top top top top top are the Jesuits. Everybody else comes under their command. They are the military. Then Speaker 1: who is the top top again, one more time, of Speaker 0: the addresses? Orsini. Speaker 1: The Orsini. Speaker 0: The Pentagon is owned by the Farnese family though. Speaker 1: Oh my God, nobody owns the Pentagon. Speaker 0: Well, if you look at the mansion The tune of the Farneses in Rome is pentagon shape and they they wanted that shape for the pentagon. Speaker 1: So Which is a pentagram, right? Which is satanic. Speaker 0: It's a pentagon. A pentagram has spikes. The pentagon has the the spikes. Speaker 1: But you could fit a pentagram inside the pentagon. Speaker 0: That's right. Exactly. Good one. Yeah. Yeah. And that's from the Farnezes. The the Coloner family, they own stuff like California, New York, the Stock Exchange But the military, the Farnez, they really run. The Jesuits are the military. They run the US military. Australia, Speaker 1: where I CIA, Nazis. All of it. Speaker 0: Catholics in action. Speaker 1: CIA. Is Israel I mean, Israel founded by, basically, Kazarian Rothschilds, their the Mossad, Mi 6. They're all ran by the Jesuits. Speaker 0: Absolutely. Speaker 1: And then all the crime families Right. Are all Catholic based. They're ran by the Jesuits, So they're playing both sides of this ball? Speaker 0: Absolutely they do. They're masters at it, they have to. Otherwise they get caught out. They have to run both sides. They're co opting everything. You see these grassroots movements like Greenpeace, they start up next thing you know, you see the corruption coming.
Saved - November 11, 2023 at 10:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Einstein, accused of being a Zionist tool, allegedly created special relativity to counter Tesla's aether theory. Critics claim it lacks empirical testing. No proof, just unproven pseudoscience.

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

Einstein was a fraud; a Zionist leveraged by the Cabal to oppose Nikola Tesla. He fabricated the theory of special relativity to counter why Michelson/Morley's interferometer experiment did not show any motion of the earth (which proved the aether existence, as Nikola knew) Time Dilation Watch the insatiable effort, to sell you unproven pseudoscience 🐂💩 with ZERO experimentation or empirical testing.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the concept of time dilation and the muon decay experiment. They explain that muons are subatomic particles that come from cosmic rays and have a short lifespan. Scientists have observed that there are more muons on Earth's surface than expected, suggesting that time must have slowed down as distance shortened. The speaker criticizes this as evidence for time dilation, arguing that it is based on philosophical bias rather than empirical evidence. They also mention the idea of speed and how changing distance requires a change in time to maintain a constant speed. The speaker concludes by calling the heliocentric model incompetent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Get into time dilation and maybe the next one where I'll bury the muon decay, which supposedly proves length contraction and time dilation. And to give you a brief breakdown of what they claim, they claim that the muon is like the electron's awkward heavy cousin. Right? Do you know the electron that they claim was a charge carrying particle of matter that has no size or shape, at least no known size or shape, but they know it's matter. But they don't know it has size or shape, but they know it's matter. It's material, but no size or shape. And it's carrying a charge like Santa carries a bag, And then they slowly changed it sleight of hand and let all the laypers people run around keep saying that. Right? And it's a 100,000,000 times smaller than the atom that can't be directly observed unless you create a contrasted image with reflectance, right? You create an image of an atom that's 99.999 99% empty space. The electron is a 100,000,000 100,000,000 times smaller than that. And then there's something they call the muon, which is the cousin of the electron, just a little heavier. And they claim this comes from cosmic rays from space coming down to the earth, hitting a certain layer in the earth's atmosphere and then creating different subatomic particles, one of which is a muon. And when they claim they find the muon on the surface of the Earth, they see that it only lasts a very small portion of time, right? And then they see way too many of the muons on the surface of the earth, which means that that neuron had to get way further than it could have based on its lifespan. Therefore, time must have physically changed and slowed down as distance shortens. Okay. And they claim that's evidence that they detect too many muons muons at the surface. And that is the best evidence they have. We'll cover that next show. We'll cover time dilation. And this is this is coding edge science. I mean, this is how bad the heliocentric model is, dude. This is just reprehensible. It's so incompetent. But the reason I wanted to touch on time dilation real quick is just so everyone the basic concept. Okay. You got speed. Speed. Right? Speed is the amount of distance traveled over time. Distance over time equals speed. Okay. So if you're gonna claim that light has an absolute speed constant. It's absolute for all observers. It's constant. It's absolute. Okay. So it can't change. C, constant speed. What you're gonna claim that the distance got shorter, right? You're gonna have to also change the time. Because if you change the distance, but keep the speed the same, that means you're gonna have to change the time. Simple analogy. If someone runs across a football field that's a 100 yards and it takes them 5 seconds. And then another guy, probably having more melanin, runs across 2 football fields in 5 seconds. Now they've ran different distances, a 100 yards and 200 yards, but they had the same time, which means the 1 guy that ran 200 yards in the 5 seconds had to be going faster. Right? Speed equals distance over time. They said that the distance or the length contracted and that the length of the apparatus contracting made the distance that that light path had to travel shorter, which means if you wanna keep the same speed but change that distance to save the heliocentric model, you then have to claim that time also changed. That is how they came up with time dilation. No experiments. Nothing like that. This is actually antithetical to scientists or religion. It's a philosophical bias built upon the doctrine of men. Void of empirical evidence, and in fact, it's so agreed just in the face of the evidence antithetical to empirical evidence. So that's how they
Saved - November 6, 2023 at 9:09 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

Do you read? https://t.co/b4zNp7xhCh

Saved - November 6, 2023 at 8:31 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

https://t.co/dMshatxuiO

Video Transcript AI Summary
Located at the center of the North Pole, this place is known as the torus field, the center of the Earth's magnetic field. The massive mountain in the center, called the root Snigra or Mount Mary, is taller than Mount Everest and reaches out to the planets. This mountain is deliberately concealed from mainstream science and media because its existence would rewrite the true nature of our world and challenge the globe-shaped earth theory. The wind stream is blocked by the mountain due to its immense height and size. Described as 33 French miles or roughly 40 miles in diameter, this mountain is linked to the major shareholder of all major companies, BlackRock.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you know what this place is? It's located in the center of the North Pole, and it's the center of the Earth magnetic field known as the torus field. That black thing in the center of the whirlwind is the tallest mountain on Earth, far more taller then the Mount Everest. It's so tall that even it keeps reaching out the planets. It's the root Snigra or the black rock, also known as Mount Mary. Some people also called it Mount Zion. You wouldn't find this massive mountain existence in mainstream science and media because it's deliberately concealed. Because if the world knew them, there is such a huge mountain In the center of the earth, it would change the course of history. This includes the true nature of our world will be rewritten, And that will undo the globe shaped earth theory and the entire timeline of the Earth from the beginning, and they don't want that. Look how the wind stream passes through that mountain. It blocks the wind stream because of its height and size. The roots nigra or the black rock describes by Mercator as 33 French miles in size or roughly 40 miles in diameter. It's purportedly explained why all capacities point to this location. The biggest shareholder of all the major companies in the world is BlackRock. It's named after this
Saved - November 5, 2023 at 11:19 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

😂 https://t.co/HybDhfTUWJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses the idea of the flat earth movement and expresses disbelief in it. They acknowledge that there are people who genuinely believe in it, often influenced by persuasive YouTube videos. The speaker also mentions that they believe there are people who are less intelligent than them but still hold these beliefs. They suggest that it may work for those individuals and imply that someone is hiding something.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's mostly just a big ball of lava. That's earth. But 10,000 feet is not a big deal. Have you given any consideration whatsoever to the flat earth movement? I think that's a trusted situation. You don't even know what to say. No. It's not. You would like to think that because you're super genius. But I, as a normal normal person, I know there's people way dumber than me, and they really, really believe. They watch YouTube videos, which go on erupted, and spewed out a bunch of fucking fake facts very eloquently and articulately, and they really believe? People really believe? I mean, if it works for them, sure. He's just trying not to spill the beans. Look at
Saved - November 4, 2023 at 8:04 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

These shill asinine comments are getting old. https://t.co/unwCPt5odY

Saved - November 1, 2023 at 10:34 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

@fzeri @sargin111 https://t.co/u02hn2iixA

Saved - October 31, 2023 at 1:40 PM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

Can you feel that? The momentum of #flatearth truth overwhelming the Heliosexual lie? https://t.co/NoMdlOiwDG

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video features Wernher von Braun discussing the Apollo 11 mission. It emphasizes the use of modern technology to capture real-time pictures and sounds. However, the second speaker goes off-topic, making claims about NASA, Disney, and JPL being founded by black magicians and controlling the human mind. The speaker also questions the belief in a spinning ball Earth and the origins of the universe. Another speaker mentions the inability to track down telemetry data from the mission. The video ends with uncertainty about the existence of the data.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am Wernher von Braun. This motion picture was produced to enable you to experience more personally and vividly the most dramatic events of the Apollo 11 story. We have made full use of modern technology to capture this experience on film. The pictures and sounds are real, recorded real time where the action really was. So come with us. We are going to Speaker 1: the moon. Astronaut to the moon. Ball Earth, b a a l, because I'm being funny, is a trippy illusion. Every observation says it's not a spinning ball, but it takes a while before it doesn't feel totally insane to realize we are not Standing on a sphere, spinning faster than the speed of sound in an infinite void, expanding outward because we are also shrapnel from an explosion 14,700,000,000 years ago in which all matter and energy came from nothing. That's Early what most people believe. NASA, Disney, and JPL were all founded by black magicians who legitimately figured out how to keep the adult mind in a state of infancy. They believe we are descended from monkey cum. We're spinning at the speed of sound On a ball, in an infinite emptiness, expanding because everything came from an explosion An unfathomable amount of time ago, there were chaotic shrapnel going forever, and out of that evolved the human I'm not in. I'm not in that. I'm not in that fucked up world. What the Nazis and a lot these people figured out was how to completely control the human mind. You know, JPL was founded by by Alan Parsons who was an Aleister Crowley student. He's a black magician. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. NASA was founded by Wernher Von Braun, who was an SS major in the Nazi army, and American Baby boomers have no problem with any of that. And then, of course, Walt Disney, who was Wernher von Braun's best friend, was a freemason who figured out how to grown adults cry using animation. And they all came together and figured out how to keep adults in a state of infancy, begging for daddy to let them take their masks off. Isn't that wild? NASA will show you that 1 microgram of plastic will make a hole this big in five because it's going so fast. And then in the next sentence, they'll show you what appears to be a meth head's tree fort hurling through that's so thin that you can stick your finger through it. It's basically aluminum foil that landed on the moon and then exploded back and then we lost the technology, you can never go back. And I'm the crazy one because I grew up because I took my diapers off because I'm not gonna be find by crazy, fucked up, abusive people. Speaker 2: It doesn't have it either. An athlete once and dozens of years. Right. Right. We we have been unable to to to track it down. I mean, we don't know, where this This telemetry data ended up, and we don't know the what what path it may have taken. So, I'm afraid I can't really give you much of a clue as to as to where this data ended up and whether it it still exists or not.
Saved - October 28, 2023 at 1:58 AM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

The truth will set you free from the lies. Open your eyes. https://t.co/7eOOHkh5KW

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the truth and asks where the curve is. They point out a 95 feet tall target, the Port Weller Lighthouse, which is visible from 42.5 kilometers away, proving it's not an illusion. Despite being at nearly the same elevation, the speaker mentions that even the floor and streetlights can be seen. They then mention visiting Saint Catherine's to confirm what they saw, specifically the blinking lighthouse and the yellow and red lights behind it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The truth can always be questioned. We aren't here to make assumptions, only to ask the question, where is the curve? Let's look across the lake at our 95 feet tall target in Saint Catherine's, Port Weller Lighthouse. This is the same target 42 and a half kilometers away during day night, Proving it's not an illusion. We're at nearly the same elevation, so that should be completely under the horizon, but even the floor and streetlights can be seen. So we decided to stop by Saint Catherine's and make sure. The lighthouse is blinking that we saw all the way from Toronto. This over here is the yellow and red lights that we saw behind it. It's the
Saved - October 28, 2023 at 1:49 AM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

#ThanksWalter https://t.co/93iiIpSaVY

Video Transcript AI Summary
At the North Pole, the North Star is directly above your head at your zenith. At the equator, the North Star is directly 90 degrees above your head. As you move past the equator towards the South Pole, the South Pole is near the horizon and is never directly above your head. The sun's path at the North Pole is curved, never going in a straight line above your head. In Sweden and Scandinavia during the summer, the sun goes around the horizon, sometimes below it, but still providing light. At the South Pole, the South Pole is near the horizon and only the army takes pictures of it directly above your head. The dome at the South Pole is reflective and turns in the opposite direction.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay? So watch this. There it is. Sun's above your head, and then it sets. One more time. That's exactly what is happening. Okay? Let's change latitudes now, and let's go to the North Pole. If you go to the North Pole, the the North Star would be directly above your head at your zenith. So if this is the latitude of 45 degrees because if the equator is here, this black line, that's 0 degrees. That's 45, which is right in the middle of 0 90 degrees. Okay? So the forty five degree parallel the North Star is visible 45 degrees. The North Star would be here. Okay? So if you're at 90 degree north, the North Star is 90 degrees above your head. 40 degree, then it's 45 degrees above your head. Now if you're at the equator, the North Star would be directly 90 degrees. You would you wouldn't even be able to see the North Star if you go past the equator. See? Watch. I'm a show you. But first you're going to see how it looks. See now it arches. It's going this way because the sun is at the equator, But you're not at the equator, so the sun doesn't go directly above your head. It does this arc it does a curve instead of a straight line. So the sun would never do a straight line at the North Pole. It would always go around you, and the sun would never do a straight line going above your head. The sun would always be turning at the horizon at the North Pole. So, the sun never sets. In Sweden and Scandinavia, during the summer, it keeps going around the horizon, And it's never above the head or below the horizon. It's it's at the horizon. Sometimes it's twilight, where the sun is below the horizon. But even though it's below the horizon, you still get light because it's not a ball. Well, peep this out, guys. This is very interesting here. Look what happens when we go past the equator And we go to the South Pole. Boom. The South Pole is near the horizon. It's never above your zenith unless you go to the South Wall, which we're not allowed to go there. So no one ever takes pictures of the South Pole directly above your head except for the army. And, that South Pole going the opposite direction is just a reflection This dome is reflective and as that turns this way Like that. This goes the other direction.
Saved - October 24, 2023 at 2:01 AM

@Incogni17422663 - zєtєtเς

I sincerely hope that if there are real Globies hiding in the the threads and followers, that they recognize how much these paid shills just will FLAT out lie at every opportunity https://t.co/lrglWfxtvZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 suggests going high enough to verify an agreement made 500 years ago.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Go high enough to actually fucking check out if what we agreed to 500 years ago, this would be old. But if you.
View Full Interactive Feed