reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @ZombyWoof2022
reSee.it AI Summary
Public health agencies are accused of covering up the increasing number of vaccine injuries and disabilities. There are calls for whistleblowers to come forward and expose the crimes being committed. Concerns are raised about the dangers of vaccines and the erosion of trust in public health. The evidence suggests a global cover-up, and the need for awareness and action to hold those responsible accountable. The article highlights the fraudulent practices, lack of transparency, and potential harm caused by the COVID-19 vaccines.
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"The bodies are piling up, the disabilities are piling up ... Our public health agencies are in cover-up mode ...This is criminal negligence and malfeasance"
Video Transcript AI Summary
These individuals strongly believe that the evidence is clear and undeniable. They argue that the statistics and consequences of the situation are evident to everyone. They accuse public health agencies of intentionally hiding the truth, which they consider to be a serious crime.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These guys are doubling down. They see the numbers we see. The numbers are everywhere for people to see. The bodies are piling up. The disabilities are piling up.
So in my viewpoint, our public health agencies are in a cover up mode and and and this is criminal negligence and malfeasance, in my humble
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"An actual increase in vaccine injuries is occurring and it is not a result of a bias leading to over-reporting; it is a result of the vaccines being dangerous." https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-most-important-dataset-of-the
The Most Important Dataset of the Pandemic Was Just Released
Germany Has Provided The Means To Quantify The Human Cost Of The Experimental Vaccination Program
midwesterndoctor.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"Deadliest Fraud in History" "Some of these people are gonna pay a very personal price. I don't wish that upon them, that's why they need to come forward quickly & start whistle-blowing so that they can get into the court system & be protected in jails." https://rumble.com/v17omi3-cv19-vax-deadliest-fraud-in-history-edward-dowd.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses their opposition to being labeled as an anti-vaxxer and clarifies that they are against fraud. They state that those who did not receive the vaccine will not resort to violence, but rather it is the individuals who feel betrayed and poisoned that may become violent. The speaker predicts that the elites will eventually face consequences for their actions, as history has shown. They emphasize the importance of whistleblowing and coming forward to avoid personal harm. The speaker references the French Revolution as an example of what can happen when the elites are disconnected from the people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People have always said, oh, are you guys gonna get violent? You know, they call me an anti vaxxer. I'm not an anti I'm an I'm I'm anti fraud, and this was a fraudulent fraud. No. We're not gonna get violent.
Those of us who didn't take the poison are not gonna get violent. The people they need to worry about and need to hire bodyguards to protect them or from their own religious zealots. And once they've realized they've been been betrayed and poisoned are gonna be the ones who go, postal. So it's not us. They need to worry about their own rank and file going postal on them once they figure this out.
And they will. I like to Make predictions. Okay? Good. I like to play the movie forward.
You know, play the tape forward. Right? So I agree people like you and me, we're not gonna get violent. I'm not calling for violence. But historically, if you've looked how these things end, they don't end until the elites let's so called elites.
Let's call them elites. Thing. These things don't end until they pay a personal price throughout history. And that's where we're headed. Some of these people are gonna pay a very personal price.
And I don't wish that upon them. That's why they need to come forward quickly and start whistle blowing so that they can get into the court system and, you know, be protected in jails. But This is where it's headed, eventually. I I I'm not gonna put a a timeline on that, but, these crimes are so hard and difficult to hide thing. That there will be that kind of action.
And I I I think Cliff High is right. And if you look historically, that's what happens at the end. I mean, you remember Marie for that saying, let them eat cake. Well, the French revolution didn't end well for the elites.
CV19 Vax Deadliest Fraud in History – Edward Dowd
Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he as he goes One-on-One with money manager and investment expert Edward Dowd for 6.7.22. To Donate to USAWatchdog.com Click Here: https://usawatchdog.com/donati
rumble.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"The people they need to worry about are from their own religious zealots who, once they realize they've been betrayed and poisoned, are gonna be the ones who go postal on them."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses their opposition to being labeled as an anti-vaxxer and clarifies that they are against fraud. They state that those who did not receive the vaccine will not resort to violence, but rather it is the individuals who feel betrayed and poisoned that may become violent. The speaker predicts that the elites will eventually face consequences for their actions, as history has shown. They emphasize the importance of whistleblowing and coming forward to avoid personal harm. The speaker references the French Revolution as an example of what can happen when the elites are disconnected from the people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People have always said, oh, are you guys gonna get violent? You know, they call me an anti vaxxer. I'm not an anti I'm an I'm I'm anti fraud, and this was a fraudulent fraud. No. We're not gonna get violent.
Those of us who didn't take the poison are not gonna get violent. The people they need to worry about and need to hire bodyguards to protect them or from their own religious zealots. And once they've realized they've been been betrayed and poisoned are gonna be the ones who go, postal. So it's not us. They need to worry about their own rank and file going postal on them once they figure this out.
And they will. I like to Make predictions. Okay? Good. I like to play the movie forward.
You know, play the tape forward. Right? So I agree people like you and me, we're not gonna get violent. I'm not calling for violence. But historically, if you've looked how these things end, they don't end until the elites let's so called elites.
Let's call them elites. Thing. These things don't end until they pay a personal price throughout history. And that's where we're headed. Some of these people are gonna pay a very personal price.
And I don't wish that upon them. That's why they need to come forward quickly and start whistle blowing so that they can get into the court system and, you know, be protected in jails. But This is where it's headed, eventually. I I I'm not gonna put a a timeline on that, but, these crimes are so hard and difficult to hide thing. That there will be that kind of action.
And I I I think Cliff High is right. And if you look historically, that's what happens at the end. I mean, you remember Marie for that saying, let them eat cake. Well, the French revolution didn't end well for the elites.
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"classic criminal behavior … a cover-up … and crimes being committed right now. They'll double- and triple-down until someone stops them … Most of the globe doesn't know what's just happened … Once we get to a tipping point…things will change." https://thehighwire.com/videos/episode-298-bringing-the-heat/
Video Transcript AI Summary
I've seen corporate frauds on Wall Street, and when they get caught, they don't admit it. They continue to lie and convince investors to hold on, just like what's happening now. Whether it was accidental or intentional, the data shows a cover-up and criminal negligence. In my experience, regulators would step in, but here, the population is unaware. We need to spread this information because most people don't know what's happening. Once enough people are aware, things can change. We can't rely on anyone to save us. It's no surprise they approved the vaccine for childhood schedules because they want immunity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I've been on Wall Street a long time and I've seen corporate frauds. And in corporate fraud, when they get caught or it's just to unravel, they don't say, hey, I'm caught. Sorry. They wait until they're stopped and they continue to tell their lies and their story. They double and triple down.
They convince some of the investors that are hanging on to their, you know, the hope that they're gonna gain back some of their losses. They they talk to them and convince them that they're not lying all the way to the end. And that's why people will hold the frauds to 0 because they believe and trust these people. It's it's classic criminal behavior. So if I take it to this horrific situation we have now, and like you said, whether they it was accidental or on purpose, it doesn't matter.
At this point, the data that I'm seeing and that, my team has presented, the global health authorities are seeing. Denmark's already told us that they're seeing it, but they're not admitting it. So it's basically a cover up, criminal negligence and crimes being committed right now, because that's what's going on. And they double and triple down until someone stops them. The problem is, in other in in my corporate fraud experience, there were regulators that would come in.
Okay, or and the markets would, punish the stocks and then the regulators would come in. So the problem here is we have a population that doesn't know what's going on. And there's a a group of us that do know, and we need to get that information to the rest of the relation, I I I call this the greatest asymmetric information gap of my career, meaning, most of the globe doesn't know what's just happened, and and we need to get them aware of this. So once we get to a tipping point, like I, you know, I saw my career in financial markets, you get enough marginal minds on board, things will change. We don't have anybody coming to rescue us.
And I I said on a couple of shows early on when I got started that, I expected them to triple and double down. And I you know, it was no shock to me that they approved the the vaccine for childhood, schedules because they want their immunity.
Page not found - The HighWire
thehighwire.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"Social proof can convince people who don't want to look at the data. If you want to continue to go along thinking everything's fine, just know that people are starting to wake up and putting money to work on this, and that hopefully wakes you up." https://thehighwire.com/videos/episode-298-bringing-the-heat/
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a conspiracy involving corporations, government, media, and big tech players. They aimed to create a COVID surveillance economy, but the vaccine has hindered their plans. The evidence against them is growing, and resistance is increasing. We need to convince those who doubt us that we are not conspiracy theorists. Wall Street is showing interest in this, and capital will flow into this space. It's sad but true. Social proof can convince people who don't want to look at the data. If you think everything is fine, know that people are waking up and investing in this cause. It's time to wake up.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is classic criminal behavior, but it's it's on a I call it a metaphor. It's it's not just a corporation. It's got government players. It's got media players. It's got big it's got big tech players.
It's a conspiracy of interests, and I think the momentum got going. And they thought that, they were gonna be swimming in riches and what what what they were looking to create, which was the COVID surveillance economy. Well, that that doesn't appear to be working out so well for them. And, the vaccine, as tragic as it is that a lot of people are dying and being disabled, it's kind of what has stopped what they're trying to do in their tracks. The the evidence is growing.
There's enough people and resistance to this that, it can't go on. And we just need to get everybody that isn't convinced yet that we're not crazy conspiracy theorists. That Wall Street is slowly starting to look at this. You know, we're trying to start a hedge fund and the interest in our hedge fund is off the darts, and money capital will flow to this space. And it's sad and tragic, but one thing I've learned is social proof.
It can convince people who won't wanna look don't wanna look at the data. And, you know, if you wanna continue to go along thinking everything's fine, just know that people are starting to wake up and putting money to work on this. And that hopefully wakes you up.
Page not found - The HighWire
thehighwire.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
Money: "Somehow that broke the spell for him" "That's what I think is the tragedy of this: a lot people got the jabs because of their tribe identity. Well, you might want to get out of your tribe identity if you know Wall St is starting to focus on this" https://thehighwire.com/videos/episode-298-bringing-the-heat/
Video Transcript AI Summary
Financial analysts have found that money can influence people's decisions regarding vaccination. One analyst shared an anecdote about a friend who initially dismissed their concerns but changed their tune after seeing a video of the analyst discussing the issue with Steve Bannon. The friend became alarmed when they learned that the analyst was meeting with hedge fund professionals to raise funds for their cause. This incident made the friend realize that even Wall Street is starting to pay attention to the issue. The analyst emphasized that when money is involved, people's priorities can shift, and even those who have been vaccinated may change their stance if it means making a profit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Must talk to other financial analysts. Have you found that, you know, I'm sure a lot of them get vaccinated. Does money talk when when it when this conversation when you approach it from that perspective?
Speaker 1: It does. I I have an anecdote from several weeks ago. A friend on Maui, who doesn't live here anymore came to visit. He got vaccinated. Thought I was kind of a kooky, crazy conspiracy theorist, then he heard I wrote a book, And he kinda laughed about that.
And then he someone showed him a a video of, that I did with Steve Bannon about this problem. Then he started giving the excuses that we all hear. Oh, it's due to suicide. It's due to drug overdoses. And I said, hey, let listen.
It's my day off by the book. And, oh, by the way, I'm meeting with some, gentlemen from the hedge fund community. They wanna help us raise assets for what we're What we're doing. And soon as he heard that, his face turned white and he ran out of there because we can't somehow that broke the spell.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: It just broke the spell for him and, I find that, social proof sometimes a lot of people Wanna be liked by everybody and that's what I think is the the tragedy of this is a lot of people got the jobs because of their tribe identity. Well, you know, you might wanna get out of your tribe identity if you know Wall Street's starting to focus on this. And I wanna give an example of What happened during the the the, great financial crisis, Goldman Sachs was up to their eyeballs in subprime debt and they were a big proponent of subprime debt. Then they noticed that something was wrong and within a day or two they went the other way. They sold all their subprime debt, then they started shorting subprime debt.
And so, Wall Street doesn't care about, about this. If Wall Street smells money, they'll turn. You know, you can understand something about money and capital. It it has a life of its own. It's a force in nature, like gravity, like the oceans.
It flows where it wants to flow. And these people will, you know, even though they just all got jabbed themselves, if they can make money they'll they'll do it. I think they're slowly waking up.
Page not found - The HighWire
thehighwire.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"the greatest miscarriage of medical science, attack on democracy, erosion of trust in public health, and damage to population health that we will see in our lifetime. I have no doubt about that, the evidence is overwhelming." —@DrAseemMalhotra
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the validity of claims that millions of lives have been saved by the COVID vaccine, stating that the evidence is weak and based on modeling studies. They argue that the vaccine has serious adverse effects, such as heart problems, and that the reported side effects are likely underreported. They criticize the lack of transparency and suppression of information by institutions and call for rebuilding the system. The speaker believes that the truth about vaccine harms will eventually come out and that getting COVID is not worse for the heart than vaccine side effects, contrary to some claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've heard, figures of around 3,000,000 lives saved globally as a result of the vaccine.
Speaker 1: Do
Speaker 0: you really want anybody that's in a vulnerable situation, an older person, somebody with a high BMI, to hear you talking down the vaccines scenes and then die from COVID. I mean, here's the thing, Asim. Surely, the COVID vaccine is, by definition, the most tested vaccine in history given the fact that 1,000,000,000 have had it?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Sadly not, Mark. And in fact, that figure of 3,000,000, that isn't based upon any good hard evidence. I mean, there was a a headline about 20,000,000 lives saved from COVID vaccines, But it was based upon the lowest level quality of evidence we can ever have a modeling study. In other words, you know, people like John Ineidis, who I consider the Stephen Hawking Medicine, describes sort of studies or observational studies is being spurious.
In other words, fake. This is science fiction, not scientific fact. And I've broken down the information in such a way. I'm I'm glad you raised this, Mark, because I'm all about informed consent. So if we take the most vulnerable group right now, which is, say, the people over the age of 80 who are the most vulnerable to COVID, You have to vaccinate 7,300 of them to prevent 1 COVID death.
Let them make that decision if that's what they really want. But you're talking of a serious adverse event rate of at least 1 in eight We pulled other vaccines in the past for much less. Swine flu vaccine, 1976 pulled because it caused Guillain Barre syndrome in 1 in 100,000. The rotavirus vaccine was pulled in 1999 because it formed caused a form of bowel obstruction in 1 in 10,000. The original trial data, Mark, Which was reanalyzed when we had the more lethal Wuhan strain, suggested one was more likely to get serious adverse effects from the, from the vaccine The more was to be hospitalized with COVID.
What does that mean, Mark? It means, if that is correct, what it clearly seems to be, it should never have been approved in the 1st place.
Speaker 0: However, a lot of these statistics around vaccine side effects are self reported, aren't they, yellow card? Is there a concern on your part about their veracity?
Speaker 1: Yeah. No. It's a great question, Mark. So, normally, people don't report these, effects unless they feel really ill. Right.
So clearly something's happened and they normally do it within a very short time period of after having the vaccine. But Actually, historically, I'm glad you've raised this, pharmacovigilance data, it's thought that serious adverse events are reported Actually only represent 10% of the true events in the population. In other words, it's likely to be tenfold higher. So if anything, of course, some of them may be coincidence, but the the likelihood is most of these yellow card card reports are genuine, And then we're missing many other people. I'll give you one example.
So this 1 in 800 figure, which is from randomized controlled trial data, so that's irrefutable in terms of at least 1800. That's in the 1st 2 months. A period medical journal concluded, because I also made that conclusion myself and they supported it, is that my father, You know, honorary vice president of the BMA, you know, Labour Party's doctor of the year, and I wanna and there's a reason I mentioned that in a minute. He suffered a sudden cardiac arrest and died 6 months after having the 2nd dose. He would not have been picked up in that original trial.
That suggests this problem is much worse as we move forward because the mechanism is and I can explain this. It accelerates heart disease. We're gonna have most people We've got mild firing of their arteries that have never bothered them, certainly not for a long time, who are suddenly presenting with severe heart problems, heart attacks, needing stents. I'm managing many of these patients myself, and the clear diagnosis has been the common denominator in these diagnosis is the vaccine. And, again, you know, it's great that Andrew Visions come forward.
So Christopher Choep has also been very vocal on this conservative MP. But I'm just really shocked that labor are silent on it. You know? And, it it's just it it just baffles me why the Labour Party and members of Labour Party aren't coming out. And I know a number of politicians.
I won't name them, certainly, Labour ones. That themselves are saying they're not gonna have any more boosters and are worried because one of their relatives was vaccine injured. They're scared to speak out, But, you know, enough is enough, Mark. This is this is really going down without a shadow of a doubt as the greatest miscarriage of medical science, attack on democracy, erosion in trust in public health, and damage to population health that we will see in our lifetime. I have no doubt about that.
The evidence is overwhelming.
Speaker 0: It's interesting. You mentioned this, this study. Some have suggested that the 1 in 800 adverse events was based on unorthodox methodology, but the bottom line is though we have it in black and white, as seen, the vaccine is killing some people, including BBC presenter Lisa Shaw, whose husband, Gareth, is endlessly on Twitter trying to draw attention to the fact that she received the AstraZeneca vaccine. She was not in the vulnerable group. She's no longer with us.
Arguably, the vaccine should have been focused on the medically vulnerable from the very beginning.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, Mark. I think that should have been we would be a lot better off if they'd just been focusing on the vulnerable. But even having said that, Because of the original data and this methodology stuff, that's nonsense. I know what a lot of those people that are questioning that so this was published in the journal vaccine about the 1 800 figure Peer reviewed, and it's not being challenged in any legitimate way by anybody other than, those that have a vested interest. And the problem we've got, and this is a real issue, and Andrew Bridgen raised it as Well, shocking allegations that someone in a leadership role, in the British Heart Foundation allegedly is involved in Suppressing information that shows that the vaccine causes current inflammation.
This is a problem that is widespread, that has been going on for many years. Richard Smith, the former editor of the BMJ, only a few years ago wrote in in the BMJ that there's a big problem with British institutions covering up research misconduct. And he gave an example where he gave a talk, and he asked people in the audience who are academics from prestigious institutions, how many of you are aware A fabrication of data or fraud taking place in your department, a third of them, Mark, put their hand up. He asked them, how many of you reported it? They will put their hand down.
This is a system failure issue, and we need to rebuild the system.
Speaker 0: The clock's against us, Assim. When will the truth out as you see it? When will the mainstream media have to, actually address and acknowledge, what you consider to be these vaccine harms that, given the fact that many that had the vaccine didn't statistically need them, were unnecessary?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Listen. I was also double vaxxed, and I was also, a misled On triple vaccinated evidence change. Yes. Can you hear me, Mark?
Speaker 0: Yeah. I've I've had it 3 times.
Speaker 1: Oh, sorry. Yes. Of course. I know. So so the thing is, you know, we were we we in good faith, we took these vaccines.
The evidence has changed. The mainstream media, I think, we just have to keep, You know, getting the information out there, there's been a big shift. I think the we're close to the bubble bursting. Certainly, the Andrew Bridgen speech was reported in the Daily Express online. International news is picking it up.
I think we're very close to that tipping point where we have to keep fighting for the truth.
Speaker 0: Three second answer. Many would say Getting COVID is worse for your heart than any vaccine side effects, including myocarditis.
Speaker 1: Completely and totally false. The Times did an article a few weeks ago. I debunked it. The headline was mild COVID linked to heart attacks. The actual paper they referred to revealed the opposite.
Mild COVID was linked to less risk of heart disease. This is a kind of fraud we're dealing with, Mark.
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
@DrAseemMalhotra "If you want to convince a loved one who doesn't trust the other doctors who have a counter-narrative, say “Wall Street's looking to bet against your decision to keep jabbing yourself” - that's social proof & it's very persuasive to lots of individuals." https://rumble.com/v20t3l0-edward-dowd-cause-unknown-or-is-it.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
This book is for people who want to convince others that Wall Street is betting against the mainstream narrative. The speaker, a former Wall Street professional, shares their experience of making money by going against the herd mentality. They claim to be a stock picking conspiracy theorist and now a vaccine conspiracy theorist. They emphasize that smart money knows something is going on and that they are starting a hedge fund based on their thesis. The speaker's goal is to save lives, so they provide data on their website for people to use as evidence. They acknowledge the censorship and blackout surrounding this information and suggest using Wall Street's interest in betting against the mainstream as social proof to persuade skeptics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And this book is for people, that wanna convince their I mean, obviously, it's for you if you want it. But once you're done reading it, hand it to someone who is on the fence, who believes you're a conspiracy theorist because I'm a Wall Street guy. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. My whole life, I spent my career living in a world between perception and reality. And I made money.
Right now, the perception is everything's fine. Most of the people think that. Reality is much different. And then when I was on Wall Street, I would come up with a thesis on a stock that the herd would think was wrong, but I was right and that's how I made my money. So I'm what you call a stock picking conspiracy theorist now.
I'm a vaccine conspiracy theorist, but I put conspiracy in quotes because I'm right. And this book is going to convince people to, their loved ones to, to hopefully understand that Wall Street is now marshaling its forces to, bet against, the narrative. And what I mean by that is, we started a hedge fund and there's super interest in it. And you know, you have to understand one thing. Money capital has a life of its own.
It's a force of nature like gravity, like the oceans, it flows where it wants to flow. And the interest in our, thesis and our viewpoint is off the hook. So we're planning on starting it over the next several months. But the bottom line is this, smart money knows something that's going on and that's how it begins. Smart it starts with smart money and then dumb money comes in at the end.
Now my goal is to save lives. So we put all our data on our website financetechnologies.com, spelled PHI instead of an f. It's the humanity project with the data is free and available for all to take and use to take local actions, sue people, use as evidence of a crime. So we're not hiding this information. But we also understand that there's a blackout on this information and censorship.
So it's the greatest asymmetric information gap of my lifetime. And, you know, if you want to convince a loved one, you know, who doesn't trust, you know, the the other doctors that have a counter narrative. Say, Wall Street's looking to bet against your decision to keep jabbing yourself. So, you know, that is social proof and is very persuasive to lots of individuals.
Edward Dowd: CAUSE UNKNOWN – Or is It?
In 2021, when the "lifesaving" Covid shots arrived, it was expected that the all-cause mortality rate, which had slightly increased in 2020, would go down, yet the opposite happened: unexplainably, de
rumble.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
@DrAseemMalhotra "Reports that were present three months ago are now inexplicably missing. And fewer than 4% of adverse events recorded in V-Safe have made their way to VAERS." @CDCgov “deleted over 32,000 records specifically with myocarditis and pericarditis” https://vigilantfox.substack.com/p/a-cover-up-of-evidence-of-mass-murder #CoverUp
Video Transcript AI Summary
In September, there were over 45,000 cases of myocarditis, pericarditis, or heart inflammation reported to Verus. However, upon further investigation, it was discovered that over 30,000 records have been deleted, reducing the number to 12,544 by December 2nd. This deletion of records is specifically focused on myocarditis and pericarditis, which is concerning considering the recent study by Doctor Latypo and Governor DeSantis on the same topic. It appears that there is an intentional effort to undermine the work of Governor DeSantis and Doctor Latypo. This situation is significant and comparable to the Pentagon Papers, highlighting the need for independent researchers like Doctor Ely to uncover the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: September 16th dataset, we had a, a signal of over 45,000 cases reported to Verus of, of myocarditis, pericarditis or heart inflammation. Right. All the kind of the same thing. Well, when I went back in to do this for you, and I was just like, well, let me go take a look around and see what's going on. There's been records deleted because that number dropped in September from 45,000 to now in December, by December 2nd, that number dropped to where are we baby?
Dropped to 12,544. So, they've deleted over 30,000 records. They've deleted over 32,000 records, from specifically with Myocarditis and Pericarditis, and I've triple checked this. I Stand by what I'm saying right there that they are deleting records again, especially on the biggest safety signal that everybody's aware of. And it's not an accident that they would do this with Doctor.
Latypo and Governor DeSantis coming out with that study about myocarditis and pericarditis. They are trying to do everything they can to delete records to thwart what Governor DeSantis and the surgeon general in Florida, Doctor. Latipo are doing? I'm stunned. Once again, it's People like Doctor.
Ely doing the work that should be done by the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. I mean, this is as big as The Pentagon Papers easily if indeed the CDC deleted those records.
A ‘Cover-Up of Evidence of Mass Murder’: The CDC Appears to Be Removing VAERS Records
Watch now (11 mins) | “It’s not an accident they would do this.”
vigilantfox.substack.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
@DrAseemMalhotra @CDCgov "Most of the globe doesn't know what's just happened" —Ed Dowd …because MSM, like the @nytimes, is still lying: "Several reinstated users…raised doubts about the effectiveness of vaccines or suggested, without evidence, that vaccines kill people." https://nytimes.com/2022/12/22/technology/musk-twitter-bans.html
Musk Lifted Bans for Thousands on Twitter. Here’s What They’re Tweeting.
Many reinstated users are tweeting about topics that got them barred in the first place: Covid-19 skepticism, election denialism and QAnon.
nytimes.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"The greatest asymmetric information gap of my career" —Ed Dowd If you only get your news from mainstream media, you've been badly propagandized about C19. Your ignorance is costing lives.
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
Cause Unknown: "tightly packed with provocative color images that tell the same story again & again & again—a lot of people started to die suddenly or became disabled in a completely unexpected way immediately after the COVID vaccines entered the market" https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/what-can-we-learn-from-cause-unknown
What Can We Learn From "Cause Unknown?"
One of my relatives (who is unaware of this blog) excitedly gave me a book yesterday that she told me I had to read. After I read it, I realized it had a few things going for it which necessitated discussing it with an audience that is already well versed in this subject.
midwesterndoctor.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"This is a clarion call to get off the bench and get onto the field … Make everyone aware of what just happened with the vaccines … If we can convince enough people that they've been poisoned by their global governments, things will change" https://speedtheshift.org/2022/11/16/ed-dowd-and-mike-adams-deep-dive-into-excess-mortality-following-covid-vaccines/
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a call to action for everyone to get involved. We need to spread awareness about the vaccine situation and convince people that they have been poisoned by their governments. It's important for everyone to play a part in this battle. Share videos from Mike and Alex Jones to get this information in front of people. Let's get off the bench and onto the field.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everyone can get involved. This is a clarion call to get off the bench and get out onto the field. You can't sit and, you know, just watch YouTube videos and talk about it at the pub. You have to literally make everyone aware of what just happened with the vaccines. And I think that's the linchpin.
If we can convince enough people that they've been poisoned by their global governments. Things will change. But the the the battle is, at the marginal mind and everybody has a part to play. You know, take Mike's videos, take Alex Jones's videos. You know, get this information in front of people.
Ed Dowd and Mike Adams Deep Dive Into EXCESS MORTALITY Following Covid Vaccines - Speed The Shift
speedtheshift.org
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
“the window is closing on what I call the death merchants, the death dealers. The evidence is becoming overwhelming …the CDC is doing the one-two shuffle here to try to cover up what’s coming. They know what’s coming; it’s becoming undeniable.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Yesterday, the Society of Actuary Research Institute released a report on group life insurance, confirming the findings of a previous study. In the third quarter, there was a significant increase in excess deaths among working-age individuals, particularly in the 35 to 44 age group. The report also indicates that there is currently a 20% excess death rate. While the Society of Actuaries may not draw the same conclusions as the speaker, the data supports their belief that there is a cause for concern. The speaker suggests that the increase in deaths cannot be solely attributed to long COVID, suicides, missed cancer screenings, or drug overdoses. Additionally, they mention ongoing research in the UK that shows a correlation between vaccination and rising deaths in children aged 1 to 14. The speaker believes that the evidence is becoming overwhelming and that the CDC is attempting to cover up the impending truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, I wanna report, something brand new. Yesterday, I was notified by one of my insurance actuarial insiders that the, Society of Actuary Research Institute put out a report on group life insurance, mortality excess mortality. And this is a a survey of 80% of the revenues of the group life US, industry. And, basically, it confirms what my self and my Wall Street partner found on your show in February that we were doing individually company by company. It confirms that in q three, if you have table 5.7, you might wanna show that.
It confirmed that in q three Yeah. Into the mandates, there was an alarming spike in working age excess deaths. In in the 35 to 44, it was a 100% over, normal for that quarter. You know, this basically this report and the quote from my insiders, to to me about this societies, basically, that she said, nerds, highest standards of data and quality ethics for real. You can rely on that report.
So this is literally confirming what we've seen in the company results aggregated. It continues to show, about 20% excess desk currently in the q end of q one in this report. I am told by her that this number remains around that level going into, q 2 from q 1. So the data has been confirmed by the the Society of Actuaries. Now Whether or not they make the same conclusions I do, I won't go there because they're actuaries.
They're not, you know, the bravest people on the planet, but I'm a loud, brash Wall Street guy. I have my thesis. I believe I'm a 100% right on what's causing the excess deaths in the US and across the globe.
Speaker 1: What you're saying now is the Society of Actuaries doing their own analysis is going to publish it's been internal, but it hasn't been promulgated publicly, I guess. They they are going to pay forward to the best of your knowledge?
Speaker 0: It's already public. It's Go ahead. I have a link on Better, site. It's already it came out yesterday and my, actuarial insider said, go look at table 5.7. It basically confirms everything you've said about the insurance industry.
So
Speaker 1: the insurance exactly 5.7. Let's put
Speaker 0: 5 Go ahead.
Speaker 1: Okay. Walk us through 5 points walk us through 5.7 because This should be the front page of the New York Times. This should be front page of the Wall Street Journal. This should the Financial Times of London should have a screaming headline. Even if the actuaries don't make the jump or don't make go the logical inclusion of what you're saying, this is what this is what the drivers are.
Just the math in itself should shock people, correct, Ed, in the normal course of business?
Speaker 0: This should be front page of Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Washington Post. It should be on Fox, CBS, NBC, ABC. This needs to stop. This what we see here, the red is highlighted by the society is an event. What was that event?
That event was mandates into q 3, August, September, October. And what what I showed earlier on your show several months ago was a breakdown of the millennial cohort where I, famously complained that the or or proclaimed that the government had committed genocide through, mandates, and, you know, the numbers are there. So we showed the millennial age group saw a rate of change into 84% excess mortality in the, Q3 of 2021, and boom. There's the Society of Actuaries confirming my work and my partner's work. There it
Speaker 1: is. So where do we go from here? I mean, we'll we'll obviously make sure the correct people get this, but Now that it's out, tell me, you know, because you make you have a theory of the case. The actuaries don't have to. They just put up the actuarial The actuarial charts.
How do you then make the link to what you're saying the case is of what's driving these, the differences in death rates?
Speaker 0: Well so the naysayers have claimed, that it's, long COVID, they've claimed that it's suicides, they've claimed that it's missed screening cancer treatments and they've claimed it's drug overdoses. The problem with that is you can see temporarily the rate of change into Q3. And you can't say to me that all these events occurred simultaneously, everyone decided to commit suicide, overdose on drugs, or miss, their cancer screening treatments. It makes no sense for that age group. That's number 1.
So temporarily, the rate of change is the smoking gum for that gun for that age group. Secondarily, we're working my my hedge fund partners and I are working on some data from the UK that's gonna basically show a linkage between ages 1 through 14 of actual all cause mortality coming down during 2020 and 2021 before that age group got vaccinated. And then mysteriously as soon as the vaccines get rolled out, the cumulative deaths start rising. And you can't say that ages 1 through 14, are overdosing on drugs, missing their cancer screening treatments, or, committing suicide. So the window, is closing on the what I call the death merchants, the death dealers.
The evidence is becoming overwhelming and, You know, I saw your show this morning, and the CDC is, doing a, the the one to, shuffle here to try to cover up what's coming. They know what's coming. It's becoming undeniable.
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"It turns out that both the regulators and the manufacturers were highly dishonest and pushed an entirely novel technology and product on millions of people without a single well designed toxicology assessment." https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/did-pfizer-perform-safety-testing
Did Pfizer Perform Safety Testing for its Covid-19 mRNA Vaccine in Preclinical Studies?
Evidence of Scientific and Regulatory Fraud
sashalatypova.substack.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"The product should be considered fraudulent and adulterated." https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/maria-gutschi-pharmd-on-lack-of-manufacturing
Video Transcript AI Summary
Stainless steel particles were found in Moderna vaccines in Japan, and a few people died after receiving them. The speaker questions how these particles made it into the vaccines and expresses disbelief that such a serious issue went unnoticed. They compare it to their experience in a pharmacy, where any contamination would result in losing their license. The speaker believes the vaccine is of poor quality and could be considered adulterated. They criticize the regulatory authorities for failing to ensure good manufacturing practices and highlight variations in batches and vials. The speaker suggests recalling the vaccines and reevaluating the manufacturing process. They doubt that the product can meet consistent manufacturing standards.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This story of stainless steel particles in Moderna has blown my mind. And I don't know if anyone knows how serious this is, how serious this is. So what happens is there were stainless steel particles that were shards of Stainless steel in there that was found in Japan. With the naked eye, you could see it. And 2, 3 Men died in Japan after receiving the Moderna.
We don't know if it's due to the stainless steel particles or not. But how did they leave the plant? Okay. You know, I make I ran a pharmacy for a while, a hospital pharmacy. I had to put in or a new clean room and anterooms And train everybody and put standards in for making hazardous chemotherapy.
If we found anything like stainless steel particles in our chemo, We lose our license. That would be it. Like, forget it. Like, it would be shut down and you have to go through the whole thing again. Nobody knew about it.
And Tell me that this was in the fill and finished plant in Spain that they didn't know and they sent it out on purpose. It's it's beyond comprehension to me. In summary, the vaccine product is of poor quality and could be considered adulterated in my view. There's failure of regulatory authorities for the chemistry, manufacturing and control. Many of the stuff don't meet the criteria for good manufacturing practices.
There's variation from batch to batch but also in my view from vial to vial. Based on manufacturing standards, lack of basic pharmacological info, and some of the errors that have been made and proven so far, like We should really recall them and think about how exactly we're making these. In my view, I am not sure that this whole product line can be fixed to be, a product that has repeatable good, manufacturing standards.
Maria Gutschi, PharmD, on Lack of Manufacturing Quality of mRNA Injections
Watch now (39 mins) | mRNA/DNA injections cannot be manufactured to cGMP standards.
sashalatypova.substack.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
C-19 💉: "Countermeasures are legally NOT pharmaceutical products. The FDA has no authority over them and cannot enforce any regulations. They only pretend that they do. This answers the question WHY the regulators are acting this way. They are acting." https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/intent-to-harm
Intent to Harm
“mRNA Vaccine Approval” was a farce. Deaths and injuries are real and intentional.
sashalatypova.substack.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
October 2020: "Operation Warp Speed Is Using A CIA-Linked Contractor To Keep Covid-19 Vaccine Contracts Secret", by @_whitneywebb "Unlike such well-funded and secretive military operations of years past, this one is aimed directly at the American people" https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/operation-warp-speed-is-using-a-cia-linked-contractor-to-keep-covid-19-vaccine-contracts-secret/
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"The data that I see clearly global governments & health authorities see the same data and they're not talking about it. The question is why. So there's a cover-up of something going on; I believe it's the vaccines." —@DowdEdward https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4Pi7DCSn2c
Video Transcript AI Summary
Global governments and health authorities are ignoring the data that I see, suggesting a cover-up. I believe the vaccines are the cause, but I'm open to other explanations. This is a massive mistake for humanity, as we have administered this experimental vaccine to 5 billion people without proper human testing. The 28-day trial seems fraudulent, and I suspect data fraud at Pfizer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Data that I see, clearly, global governments and health authorities see the same data and they're not talking about it. And the question is why? So there's a cover up of something going on. I believe it's the vaccines. If anybody has another, thesis that could make sense to me, I'd love to hear it.
I haven't heard one yet. But, it's become apparent to me that there's definitely a cover up going on on a global scale because this is one of the biggest, bio, biological missteps we've ever made in in in in humanity. And we've just, you know, dosed 5,000,000,000 people on this planet with this with this thing that is experimental, never was actually tested on humans, had a 28 day trial, which, you know, I can get into it, later on. But that it looks fraudulent to me. It looks like the data was manufactured.
So there was data fraud at Pfizer in my humble opinion.
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
@DowdEdward "There was a military-grade psy-op propaganda campaign ... it's come out through FOIA requests that the government gave over a billion dollars to mainstream media to push the vaccine narrative and censor anybody with a counter-narrative" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4Pi7DCSn2c
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that the situation surrounding the vaccine has been a disaster and suggests that there was a military-grade propaganda campaign to promote it. They claim that the government provided over $1 billion to mainstream media to push the vaccine narrative and censor opposing views. According to the speaker, this violated informed consent for the entire country and the world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This this thing was, a disaster from the get go and it has become apparent to me and many others that there was a, military grade propaganda campaign that was pushed forth. And it's come out through requests that the government gave over $1,000,000,000 to mainstream media to push the vaccine narrative and, censor anybody with the counter narrative, not allow them on their shows. So informed consent at a bare minimum was violated for the whole country and the globe in my humble opinion.
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"Why are they continually trying to re-animate the explanation that this is a natural spillover event? Because if it isn't then we know who did it ... Those who are responsible cannot allow a full investigation." https://open.spotify.com/show/4rOoJ6Egrf8K2IrywzwOMk #Fauci
Video Transcript AI Summary
It is important to determine what exactly happened and when, as there are disturbing questions that need to be addressed. The continuous effort to push the narrative of a natural spillover event is to avoid implicating anyone. If it was a natural occurrence, Anthony Fauci would be cleared of any involvement. However, if it was a result of gain of function research, particularly in Wuhan with our funding, it changes the situation. We have faced significant resistance for simply pointing out obvious patterns and evidence that are being ignored. This resistance stems from those responsible not wanting a thorough investigation to take place.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I still I still believe that it is in our vital interest to figure out exactly what happened and when. I will point out that is also a big question that leads, in a number of very disturbing directions. But, leaving these questions aside is, is not in our interest. So back to your question though, why are they continually trying to, reanimate the explanation that this is a natural spillover event. Because if it isn't, then we know who did it.
Right? Anthony Fauci was key to circumventing the ban on gain of function research that resulted in the Wuhan lab being funded by us to do this work. So if this was a natural spillover event from a wet market, then Anthony Fauci is in the clear. Right? If this is the result of ill conceived gain of function research taking place in Wuhan partially at our direction, that's a whole different ballgame.
And so part of what you and I have experienced, right, the Incredible pushback that we have gotten for just noticing obvious patterns, right, patterns of dishonesty, patterns of evidence that aren't being discussed. That is about the, the fact that those who are responsible cannot allow a full investigation.
Page not found
open.spotify.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
“One of the effects of the deployment of these ventilators, and the fact that it killed people, was that it elevated our collective sense of how dangerous the pathogen was. That fear was a big part of how we were sold on the rest of it.” https://open.spotify.com/show/4rOoJ6Egrf8K2IrywzwOMk
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speakers discuss the alternative scenario of not implementing official measures when COVID-19 emerged. They suggest that if doctors were left to figure out how to treat the disease on their own, they would have inevitably made mistakes but also learned from them. They mention the example of ventilators, which were initially seen as crucial but later caused harm. The deployment of ventilators increased fear and influenced public perception of the virus. The speakers emphasize the importance of protecting vulnerable populations without unnecessarily exposing the rest of the population to risks. They also mention the comparison with the flu.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All of that suggests a very ominous picture, and I would say, well, let's compare 2 worlds. Let's compare the world where when COVID emerged, we did nothing official. We recognized that it existed to the extent that we could do that, and we just let doctors figure out how to treat it. Right? If that had happened, Then doctors would have I don't mean this in a negative way they would inevitably have killed a certain number of people following hunches, Deploying techniques that didn't work, but they would have discovered that, and they would have gotten rapidly better at treating this disease, and they would have discovered all of the compounds that work, and they would have talked to each other about in what way to deploy those compounds, at what dosage.
They would have discovered all of that stuff.
Speaker 1: And we can see that in the implementation of respirators.
Speaker 0: Of, yeah, of ventilators.
Speaker 1: Ventilators.
Speaker 0: Excuse me. Absolutely.
Speaker 1: And Because that was the narrative at the beginning of the pandemic. We need more ventilators.
Speaker 0: We need more ventilators. And I must say that there's a part of me that is increasingly revisiting that chapter, and I I you can hear me hesitating to say this, but one of the effects of the Deployment of these ventilators and the fact that it killed people was that it elevated Our collective sense of how dangerous the pathogen was, and that fear was a big part of how we were sold on the rest of it. Right? So you have a lot of vulnerable people in a population. Right?
They're concentrated amongst the elderly and the infirm. Nobody is okay. Nobody decent is okay with the fact that if you have a new pathogen circulating, it is liable to kill those people disproportionately. However, it's unexpected it's not unexpected, and it should not trigger you to expose the rest of your population to risks that they don't need to face.
Speaker 1: And we experienced that with the flu. Right.
Speaker 0: All the time.
Page not found
open.spotify.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"no acceptance criteria for vials/doses exist ... These products are fraudulent by design." https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/it-doesnt-add-up
It Doesn't Add Up!
Nobody knows what's in the vials, nor how much of it is there.
sashalatypova.substack.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
Pfizer had an 'OTA' contract "which states there was no legal obligation to conduct valid or clean clinical trials because the only goods and services being paid for by the US government was for a large-scale manufacturing demonstration of a 'prototype'"
Video Transcript AI Summary
In January 2021, Brooke Jackson filed a lawsuit against Pfizer, claiming that she witnessed the company defraud the US government by lacking oversight in the making and distribution of vaccines. She was particularly concerned about the absence of clinical trials and safety protocols. Pfizer countered the lawsuit by stating that the US government was already aware of the lack of clinical trials and safety protocols. They provided evidence in the form of a base agreement, stating that there was no legal obligation to conduct valid clinical trials because the government's payment was for a large-scale manufacturing demonstration, not for clinical trials.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In January of 2021, Brooke Jackson, working with Ventavia, a subcontractor of Pfizer, filed a lawsuit against Pfizer for violation of the Federal False Claims Act, which is a federal statute originally enacted in 18/63 in response to defense contractor fraud during the American civil war. Miss Jackson's claim in the lawsuit is that she witnessed Pfizer defraud the US government. This defrauding occurred through lack of oversight in the making and distribution of vaccines. The lack of coherent clinical trials or any clinical trials for that matter was particularly alarming to her. She assumed the US government would want to know the company they were funding was failing every clinical trial, every safety regulation and disregarding standard procedure for the transparency, safety, and efficacy of a COVID vaccine about to be distributed to 100,000,000 Americans and the global population.
Pfizer countered miss Brooks' lawsuit by stating in their motion to dismiss that they could not be defrauding the US government because the US government was already fully aware that there were no clinical trials or no safety e protocols in the making of the COVID nineteen injectable.
Speaker 1: Within the motion to dismiss, Pfizer offered their evidence by producing a base agreement between the Department of Defense's Research and Technology Development Center, Advanced Technology International and Pfizer. This base agreement is what's known as an Other transaction authority or an OTA contract. Which states there was no legal obligation to conduct valid or clean clinical trials because the only goods and services being paid for by the US government Was for a large scale manufacturing demonstration of a prototype.
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"we have this theatrical performance called 'clinical trials' but they were actually not real …The clinical trail subjects were deceived, most of the clinical trail sites & investigators were also deceived, and most of the FDA employees were deceived" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERvURcpg3JE
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Department of Defense used shady contracting practices and laws to shield pharmaceutical companies from conducting proper clinical trials. They manipulated public perception with the help of mainstream media. The clinical trials were just a theatrical performance and not required by law. Human subjects were deceived, including a 13-year-old girl who experienced adverse events. The Vaccine Safety Council had an ad featuring her, but it was pulled from airing during the Super Bowl. Most clinical trial sites, investigators, and FDA employees were also deceived, as only a few top officials were aware of the scam.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Department of Defense used very shady contracting practices and also used several laws that were put in place previously, previous to COVID, to to do this, to shield pharmaceutical companies, to not conduct, you know, proper clinical trials, to do a lot of fraudulent, I would say, manipulations of public perception, and all in collusion obviously with mainstream media and these pharma companies, And so as a result, we have this theatrical performance called clinical trials but they were actually not real. They were they did not, you know, based on the laws that are used here and invoked in this process, the clinical trials are not required at all. And in fact, they cannot be conducted.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's one of there's many there's many really troubling parts of the story. We'll we'll unpack a few of them. But that one stands out to me, Perhaps at the top of the list is the theatrics that were put in place for these trials. So there were human beings, In many ways, being used as props to paint the veneer that they were somehow going through deep trials to make sure that we were all safe with these vaccines. And you have I know there was, for instance, a 13 year old girl.
They, in fact, had an ad. The Vaccine Safety Council had put out an ad that was going to run during the Super Bowl. Then it was yanked by Comcast. They wouldn't allow it to air, which shows a perfectly healthy 13 year old girl who went through this particular trial, and then Ended up having all sorts of adverse events. So these people were used as props, essentially, right?
Speaker 0: Yes exactly, and so the clinical trial subjects were deceived, and, but importantly most of the clinical trial sites, and investigators were also deceived. And most of the FDA employees were deceived because this, particular scam is driven from the top. Only few people, as far as I understand, at the top of these organizations, the Department of Defense, HHS, FDA, BARDA, their legal, councils, they know. But then the rest of the regular employees and rank and file and especially
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"At least three global regulatory agencies - FDA, EMA and TGA, all accepted fake Western blot images as if they didn’t know any better. Of course they did. They did know. Nobody made a mistake. These documents were “props” in a theatrical performance." https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/fake-western-blots-submitted-by-pfizer
Fake Western Blots Submitted by Pfizer to Several Regulatory Agencies.
Props in a theatrical performance do not have to be real. Top EMA officials were clearly in on the scam, so were the FDA and TGA.
sashalatypova.substack.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
Intentionally meant to harm? "We know that they are lying, and they're not doing anything about it." https://rumble.com/v1noo7s-sasha-latypova-whistleblower-covid-injections-department-of-defense-bio-wea.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that the intentional nature of the situation is clear, supported by a wealth of data on scientific fraud, regulatory fraud, PCR test fraud, adverse events, deaths, and excess mortality correlating with vaccination rates. The regulators, who are experienced and trained, are accused of lying and denying the evidence. While some argue it is for financial gain, the speaker argues against this, pointing out that liability has been removed and shipping placebos would have been more profitable. Instead, the speaker concludes that the intention is to harm and kill people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The the part that it's intentional is absolutely clear. So even if, you know, let's let's say, maybe it's a different purpose. I I can't get in the head of a criminal. But I totally can convince you that this is intentional very easily, because, it's it's not it's no longer, you know, we're two and a half years into it. There's so much data that came out.
There's so much of this information, the the scientific fraud, the regulatory fraud, the PCR test fraud, the amount of, adverse events and deaths, excess mortality all over the world in perfect correlation with the vaccination rate. The higher the vaccination, the higher the excess mortality. So there's overwhelming amount of data and none of those regulators who are denying and, and not, you know, pretending like this is not happening. Again, they're not amateurs. They were not Born yesterday.
They are all credentialed. They they're trained, and they've experienced. So we know that they're lying and they're not doing anything about it. And, since they're lying and denying, we know it's intentional. So the intentional part is absolutely proven.
As far as, you know, whether this is for the purposes of depopulation, Well, you know, that's a that's a logical conclusion because they're they're insisting on killing and injuring people. Now a lot of, a lot of People are saying well it's just because of money. You know, pharma is making billions and all these politicians are making billions because, you know, they have stalking these farmers and so forth so it's all about money. Actually, that's also not true and very easy to demonstrate because You know, think about it. They've removed all possible liability.
They don't have to follow any rules with these products. They can ship whatever they like through DoD distribution network, black box, and if if the objective is only to make money, if you shipped placebo, they would have made 2, 3 times more money that they're making now and in perpetuity because none of us would have noticed any problem. We would all think these are good products. COVID would have disappeared by itself, and they could claim success. Mhmm.
Okay? So if this was just about money, this is what they would have done. But it's not about money. They're insisting on killing and injuring people.
Sasha Latypova - Whistleblower - Covid Injections - Department of Defense - Bio Weapon
Sasha is an authority on the scientific research process and manufacturing supply chain of pharmaceutical products. When many in her position would be enjoying their wealth and a indulgent lifestyle S
rumble.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"the entire circus of trials and FDA approvals were literally just pandemic theater" "One of the federal agencies has to investigate the DOD and everyone else involved. The likelihood of this happening seems minuscule." https://syedhaider.substack.com/p/the-covid-military-coup
The COVID Military Coup
The DOD Is Officially In Charge
blog.mygotodoc.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"That's the biggest lie - FDA has no regulatory authorities over countermeasures ... The FDA is impersonating regulators to the public ... They're play-acting!" https://rumble.com/v25amto-the-kim-iversen-show-1-13-23.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that the representation of COVID-19 vaccines as vaccines is false. They argue that the FDA has no regulatory authority over these countermeasures, and that the manufacturers engaged in fraud and data manipulation. They claim that there is documented data showing significant injury and death, which Pfizer was aware of. The FDA's assertion that the vaccines are safe and effective is seen as play-acting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, so so what was faked, in my opinion, and actually, you know, based on these contracts and how they're written, is the representation to the public that first of all these are vaccines and they're not vaccines, they're countermeasures. And you can see clearly in the contracts it states that, that the FDA is regulating them. That's not true. That's the biggest lie. FDA has no regulatory authorities over counter measures.
And in fact they all cited that piece of law, including the FDA, so they all knew what they were doing. The piece of law that says that use of emergency use authorized countermeasures that under public health emergency does not constitute clinical investigation. And so the regulations need not apply. And so that's the piece that they're all citing, including FDA, so they're in full knowledge what they're doing. And there the FDA is impersonating regulators to the public to convince everyone and fool everyone into believing that these are actually really pharmaceuticals, that they are really manufactured to good manufacturing practices, that really there were rigorous clinical trials instead of the the huge amount of fraud and manipulation of data that they did on behalf of these manufacturers.
So that's the biggest lie. That explains why for 2 years very The premier scientists and advocates and people who, professionals, collect impeccable data. By the way, this is like the best that's documented with data a health event in the history of humankind. And there is good data showing huge amounts of injury and death. And Pfizer knew about it.
That they've issued a report in February of 2021. So everybody knows and then the FDA goes and says, Oh they're safe and effective. That don't worry everybody, go away, get vaccinated. So this makes no sense whatsoever except when they're acting. They're play acting.
And that is how they were hired to do this
SHOCKING FOIA DOCUMENTS: COVID Pandemic Was a Secret DoD Operation dating back to Obama Administration
The Kim Iversen Show LIVE 1-13-23 Thank you for watching the fully independent Kim Iversen Show. Get the FULL SHOW without ever missing a segment here: https://rumble.com/c/KimIversen Get your Free Bi
rumble.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"if they wake up? The first thing they would do is kill their leaders" —Mattias Desmet
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"This is the [VAERS] data for the last 10 years: all the vaccines combined compared to just three products in 2021. There is nothing normal going on here. The owners of this data are the FDA and the CDC - they're not talking about this." https://rumble.com/v29r5r4-mrna-technology-lessons-and-consequences-full.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Over the past 10 years, the number of adverse events and deaths from COVID products has far surpassed those from all other vaccines combined. This is a concerning trend that affects people of all age groups, not just the elderly. The data, owned by the FDA and CDC, is normalized to the number of doses administered, and it clearly shows a significant increase in adverse events, particularly among children and young adults. The use of bivalent shots has been disastrous, with severe adverse events and even deaths reported soon after their administration. Babies as young as 0 to 4 years old were injected with these vaccines before they were officially authorized. The data also suggests a potential link between syncope (fainting) and myocarditis diagnoses, particularly in the 25 to 39 age group. Younger individuals are filing more reports, indicating that they are more affected by these adverse events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the data, for the last 10 years. The, all the vaccines combined compared to just 3 products in 2021. There's nothing normal going on here. The owners of this data are the FDA and the CDC. They're not talking about this.
Houston, we have a problem. This is this is by age group, so nobody's immune. This isn't just about old people getting sick and dying. This is everybody. Normalized data on the right proves this.
This is normalized to the number of doses doled out according to the CDC. I can tell you for a fact That every week, these numbers are still going up and they're going up faster in kids. Everyone under 24. This is the same plot. Last 10 years, COVID products versus all the vaccines combined for all the, adverse events and all the deaths.
No comparison. You don't have to do stats to see, like this is Ridiculous. Bivalent shots are already a disaster. As soon as these things went out, the very 1st week, there were reports and bears clustered around the young people and the older people. It's exponentially growing, and it's not just chills and fever, it's severe adverse events and death.
They were injecting babies, 0 to 4, long before this was so called EUA authorized. That is very mysterious to me. Not only were they being injected, but these are reports that made it into VAERS. And these, this doesn't include the under reporting factor. Why were they being injected with this crap?
And even more scarily, This stuff was supposed to be used as a booster, so why are they giving it as a 1st shot? It makes no sense. And even Paul Offit is speaking out against this. He calls it a cautionary tale, Tells you something. Couple more slides.
If you pull out all the amyloid reports, adverse event reports combined with fibrin in VAERS, You get about 26,000 reports scattered along, all the age groups. When you add syncope, which is fainting, it goes up almost by 4. And you see this little peak in the 25 to 39 year old group. And I'm like, Woah, what is going on there? The reason I looked at syncope was because I'm wondering if the myocarditis diagnoses that everybody knows about by now is not cardiac amyloidosis.
I'm almost certain now that this is what's happening. So So which if you normalize that data, you get a picture like this. So on the right, it actually shows that the younger people are being more affected by this. They're filing more reports. So So this is a real phenomenon going on.
mRNA technology: Lessons and consequences – FULL
Dr Jessica Rose - PANDEMIC STRATEGIES, LESSONS AND CONSEQUENCES, 21st- 22nd January 2023
rumble.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"German Press Discusses Pfizer Vaccine Trial Fraud." "Die Welt mentions that Pfizer’s contracts included a liability waiver even for Pfizer's negligence and for “fraud or bad faith on the part of Pfizer itself”." https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/german-press-discusses-pfizer-vaccine
German Press Discusses Pfizer Vaccine Trial Fraud. Will "Covid Reckoning" Follow?
"Pfizer fraud" now openly discussed in mainstream national press
igor-chudov.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"we're not in the world where pharmaceutical regulations apply; we're now in this strange dystopian state of a public health emergency where they're using EUA products ...they're telling the public these are really pharmaceutical products but they're not" https://rumble.com/v2bvae6-sasha-latypova-interview-how-pfizer-and-the-department-of-defense-defrauded.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that the COVID injections are not considered pharmaceutical products. They discuss the significance of a particular US code that states the use of emergency use authorized (EUA) countermeasure products is not considered a clinical investigation. This allows the government to remove these products from regulatory frameworks and operate in an extrajudicial space. The public health emergency announcement triggers this mechanism, and the government can make determinations without data or criteria. The speaker also mentions that the COVID pandemic was declared based on limited cases, and once a pandemic is announced, pharmaceutical regulations no longer apply. The products are classified as countermeasures, which is a vague term.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These COVID injections are actually not pharmaceutical products. And that brings me to my next question, which is really aimed at a particular US code, which states that the use of the EUA covered countermeasure products shall not be considered to constitute a clinical investigation. So can you just explain for us what this means and why it's significant?
Speaker 1: Yeah. So this ties together several pieces of legislation. It's the public health emergency announcement that kind of triggers this mechanism. And also EUA And then, you know, the countermeasures part. So all of this together creates this structure where the government can take these products out of their regulatory framework and into this completely extrajudicial space where no rules apply.
So when they, so the public health emergency gets announced by HHS single handedly based on no data at all. There's no criteria that is involved in them making that determination. So when WHO announced the COVID pandemic based on 40 cases and 8,000,000,000 people, which is absolutely Ridiculous. They just said, oh, we have a pandemic. Then HHS also single handedly decided that we have pandemic in the United States.
And the states themselves subsequently also all fell in line and announced this pandemic. So once that happens, then we're in a different world. We're not in a world where pharmaceutical regulations apply. We're now in this strange, dystopian state of public health emergency, where they're using emergency use, the authorized products, which are, You know, they're they're telling the public that these are really pharmaceutical products, but they're not. They're countermeasures.
So they're classified in these contracts and these by this law as a countermeasure, which is a very fuzzy term. Like pharmaceutical is a legally defined term, very
Sasha Latypova Interview - How Pfizer & The Department Of Defense Defrauded The Public
In this interview, we are joined by former pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) executive, Sasha Latypova, who explains how the mRNA injections, products which are shown to be unsafe, continu
rumble.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"the biggest corruption scandal in the history of the European Union" https://rumble.com/v2btn5k--we-are-witnessing-the-biggest-corruption-coverup-in-eu-history..html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes a report for omitting important information discussed in the committee. They highlight that contracts were not fully disclosed and mention a scandal involving text messages between Ursula von der Leyen and Albert Bourla. They question the safety and effectiveness of the injections, citing a statement from a Pfizer representative. The speaker argues that information about the SARS CoV-two virus was known prior to the report's claim. They also dispute the claim that vaccines saved 250,000 lives, pointing out the high mortality rates in highly vaccinated countries. The abusive use of the Digital Green Certificate and the violation of individuals' rights to consent are also mentioned. The speaker concludes that this report highlights a disconnect between EU institutions and its citizens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Regarding this report, it does not cover major aspects revealed in this committee. 1st, the report does not talk about the fact that the contracts were not fully shown to the members of this committee. Also, the report does not talk about the scandal related to the text messages between Ursula von der Leyen and Albert Bourla. Second, the report talks about these injections as being so called safe and effective. But the Pfizer representative stated in this committee that they haven't tested their injections since if they are stopping the transmission of the virus.
Who support any more such a baseless statement about these injections? 3rd, the report states that and I quote, nothing was known about the SARS CoV-two and the disease caused by this new virus, including nothing about the genetic sequence. This statement is false. In the documents submitted to EMI by Moderna, for example, to receive authorizations. They submitted studies of their vaccines conducted prior to 2019.
Actually, they submitted documents showing that they tested their vaccines since 2016. Also, Pfizer BioNTech started the tests of their vaccines 3 days after the genetic sequence was made public. How is that possible? The 1st genetic sequence was made public on January 11, 2020 and they started the test on January 14th. 4th, the report claims that the vaccine the vaccines saved 250,000 lives.
No scientific methodology was presented that was used to calculate that figure. At the same time, we see now that the countries with the highest vaccination rate nation already have the highest mortality rate. The report is not covering this issue. 5th, nothing was said about the abuse by the abusive way in which the Digital Green Certificate was used all across Europe. 6th, the report is ignoring the fundamental rights of any human being to not be forced to be injected with a medical product, such a medical decision must have been the sole result of a free and informed consent of that patient, not the political decision of a parliament or of some bureaucrats.
In conclusion, this report proves that the clear disconnect between the EU institutions including the European Parliament and the European citizens.
" We Are Witnessing The Biggest Corruption Coverup In EU History."
Romanian 🇷🇴 MEP Cristian Terhes presents at the European parliament : " We Are Witnessing The Biggest Corruption Coverup In EU History ." - ⚡️ THE EU IS OVER --->>> https://rumble.com/v1olx6c-the-eu-i
rumble.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"they went in and doctored the data, fabricated the data, falsified the certifications, falsified - fraudulently - and submitted fraudulent invoices to the Defense Department and to the FDA" @thevivafrei @barnes_law @IamBrookJackson https://rumble.com/v2c0cqc-brook-jackson-v.-pfizer-the-biggest-whistleblower-case-in-american-history-.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
Brooke Jackson, a former clinical trial worker, witnessed numerous instances of malfeasance and misfeasance during her time supervising the clinical trials for Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. She observed needles sticking out of bags, private information displayed publicly, patients not being properly monitored, incorrect blood collection methods, and lack of informed consent. The trials were supposed to be randomized and placebo-blinded, but they were neither. The vaccine was not stored at the correct temperature, and baseline data was not collected. Additionally, the data was doctored, certifications were falsified, and fraudulent invoices were submitted to the FDA and the defense department. Jackson reported these issues to the FDA in September 2020.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Brooke Jackson has brought a claim. She was involved in, clinical trial work in in the pharmaceutical arena for better part of 2 decades, was a supporter of vaccines, wanted to see this vaccine work, was brought in to supervise part of the process on behalf of the, Ventavia that was subcontracted by Pfizer to perform the the clinicals, third stage of the clinical trials to assure the safety and efficacy and the immunization capacity of the COVID nineteen drug for the prevention of COVID nineteen. When she was there over about a 3 week time frame, she witnessed extraordinary malfeasance and misfeasance. This includes, but is not limited to, the Plaint has hundreds of paragraphs and hundreds of additional evidence of documentary, evidence and testimonial evidence where she witnessed extraordinary and exceptional breaches of the basic standards and rules and regulations governing clinical trials to assure you know, the clinical trials are the only metric we have to measure whether a drug is safe and effective and has immunization capacity. So this was the key measurement, in order to be able to know what this drug would do.
And what she saw was needles sticking out of bags. What she saw was people's private information plastered on walls. What she saw were people being rolled out in corridors, without, you know, suffering some cases, adverse events without being monitored, people's blood being taken in the wrong way, people informed consent not being given. It was supposed to be a randomized placebo blinded test. It was neither randomized nor placebo blinded, in any meaningful manner.
It was unblinded repeatedly. They weren't even giving the vaccine at the proper temperature. They weren't taking baseline data to even know what the effect of the vaccine was. And what they did is instead, they went in and doctored the data, fabricated the data, falsified the certifications, falsified fraudulently and submitted fraudulent invoices to the defense department and to the Food and Drug Administration. So in September or fall of 2020, she calls, the FDA.
Let because first, she goes up through her entire chain of commands.
Brook Jackson v. Pfizer: The Biggest Whistleblower Case In American History - Viva & Barnes
Brook Jackson's whistleblower and Qui Tam claim agaibst Pfizer.
rumble.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"The safety testing that we did see, which was conducted by the pharmaceutical industry, was Kabuki Theater put on for the public with no regulatory implications. That's why they were able to take all these short-cuts - because it was meaningless theater" https://rumble.com/v2df7hg-militarized-healthcare.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that a series of laws allowed the military to take over vaccine distribution without any clinical trials or safety testing. The safety testing conducted by the pharmaceutical industry was just for show and had no regulatory implications. The FDA, which is responsible for regulating medical products, does not have the authority to regulate these countermeasures. The legal framework being used pretends that these are health products when they are actually in a different legal space.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And let me let me just give a a punchline to what you're about to tell us, which is that, essentially there were a series of laws put in place that allowed the military the takeover distribution of vaccines and under a provision that does not allow any clinical trials and does not allow any safety testing, and that essentially, the safety testing that we did see, which was conducted by the pharmaceutical industry, was Kabuki theater put on for the public with no regulatory implications, and that's why they were able to take all these shortcuts because it was meaningless, theater. Now I I'm gonna let you explain kind of the long version of that, but that's what people, know, that's kind of where we're going.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yes. Exactly. So it was, you know, a pretend authorization by Regulatory agency, FDA, that has no, regulatory mandate to regulate countermeasures in the United States. Yeah.
Remember, the FDA mandate is to regulate interstate commerce of medical products, and food. Right? So they are supposed to approve medical products, and these are not medical products. They are countermeasures. So that that legal framework that's being utilized is essentially, pretending that, this this this, this is a health event and pretending that these are health products While using the laws that actually put them into a totally different space legally or pseudo legally, I would say.
Militarized Healthcare
This in-depth interview with Sasha Latypova is one that viewers won’t want to miss! She details the corruption in clinical trials and vaccine manufacturing as well as their relationship to product man
rumble.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"Please dismiss this case, judge. We [Pfizer] did not defraud the government; we delivered the fraud that the government ordered." —@sasha_latypova
Video Transcript AI Summary
The US government's Department of Justice defends pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer in court cases, even when they are accused of withholding clinical trial data. This shows that the pharmaceutical companies are not in charge, but rather controlled by the Department of Defense and the government. While the pharmaceutical companies are also responsible for their actions and should be prosecuted, this collaboration between government and private corporations is a model of fascism. Pfizer has even used this alliance as a legal defense in a case where they are accused of defrauding the government. They argue that they delivered the fraud the government ordered.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And they have a office of general counsel, which is the Department of Justice defending them. In fact, when you know, there was this famous, case where, Pfizer or it was said that Pfizer or FDA didn't want to release clinical trial data for 75 years. Well, who was arguing in court on behalf of Pfizer? Pfizer lawyers were not even in the room. It was the Department of Justice.
So why is the US government defending presumably a private commercial interest of a pharmaceutical company. So, here you can see that the pharmaceutical companies are a third level down. They are not in charge but they're getting tremendous amounts of money to shut up and follow the orders and do as they're told. But the whole operation is run by the Department of Defense and the US government. I'm not absolving farmers, by the way, of any responsibility, they are criminals in this cartel and they're collaborating and they're co conspirators and should be prosecuted together.
But as, doctor Malone actually mentioned, and I completely agree, here we have an implemented model of fascism. This is how it's done. Government merges with private corporations. You can't even say who's wagging the dog, but they merged and then they align and then extending this liability to the private commercial entities from which they then extract commercial interest or whatever interest they want to extract. Pfizer already invoked this in there as a legal defense.
There, you know, if you maybe heard about Brooke Jackson's it's in the U. S, she's suing Pfizer under False Claims Act, that they defrauded the government. Well, Pfizer already filed motion to dismiss. The case hasn't been dismissed yet, but Pfizer already in court stated that, please dismiss this case, judge. We did not defraud the government.
We delivered the fraud that the government ordered.
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
@sasha_latypova "The excess deaths are now exceeding 2020. The disabilities are well above 2020. So what do we have now? We have a pandemic! These are pandemic numbers that we're not talking about. This is actually a pandemic of the vaccinated. Full stop." —@DowdEdward https://rumble.com/v2f29ha-edward-dowd-fed-raising-rates-would-be-a-willful-demolition-of-the-banking-.html
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the current pandemic situation. They highlight that the number of excess deaths and disabilities in 2021 has surpassed those of 2020. They argue that we are currently experiencing a pandemic, specifically among the vaccinated population. The speaker expresses their surprise at the lack of attention given to this issue, considering the fear and concern that was prevalent in 2020. They find it mind-blowing that the ongoing pandemic is not being discussed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's just stop for a second and talk about the 2020 pandemic. We didn't have numbers like this. We didn't and the excess deaths are now exceeding 2020, and the disabilities are well above 2020. So what do we have now? We have a pandemic.
This is actually these are pandemic numbers that we're not talking about. This is actually a pandemic of the vaccinated. Full stop. And what what blows my mind is All the the fear mongering that that went on in 2020, the numbers I'm seeing don't even compare to 2020. So the People, we are literally in a pandemic, and it's not even being talked about.
It's a this is mind blowing to
Edward Dowd: Fed Raising Rates Would Be a Willful Demolition of the Banking System
Edward Dowd: Fed Raising Rates Would Be a Willful Demolition of the Banking System
rumble.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"they want us to put all of the blame onto these pharmaceutical companies?" —@_taylorhudak "That's what they want people to focus on - not on the actual crime as it happened." —@sasha_latypova https://www.bitchute.com/video/jFALCCKT1NW8/
Video Transcript AI Summary
Pfizer is being accused of colluding with the US government and the Department of Defense in what is considered a war crime. However, the speaker believes that putting all the blame on pharmaceutical companies is a deliberate tactic. They argue that the truth will eventually be revealed, leading to repercussions. To divert attention, the speaker suggests that Pfizer will be portrayed as a corrupt capitalist company that bought off politicians and government officials. Pfizer will likely plead guilty to minor crimes through shell companies, paying fines that the government will distribute to themselves. The speaker emphasizes that this strategy protects those involved and shifts focus away from the actual crime committed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who's really to blame here?
Speaker 1: Well, so absolutely, Pfizer is liable for colluding with the US government, and the Department of Defense in this crime. Okay. So this is a crime, a war crime, because it's, you know, we're at war. So Pfizer is complicit in the war crime, should be prosecuted, should be, of course, held liable. But the point I'm trying to make to people, if, you know, if you if you believe that all of this power, all of this incredible power is exerted by a private pharmaceutical manufacturer, you're incredibly deluded.
And that's maybe what they want you to believe because they've won. Wait.
Speaker 0: Let me just get you you wait. Let me just get you to repeat that and and clarify here. You think it could be possible That they want us to put all of the blame onto these pharmaceutical companies?
Speaker 1: Of course. Because, ultimately, they know The lie will be uncovered. And it's already, you know, about, say, half of the people already realize it's a lie, at least to some degree, maybe even more. So they know that the lie will eventually be uncovered, that the truth will come out. They will, there will be some sort of Reprecursion.
At this point, they immediately need to say, oh, it's a bad pharmaceutical capitalist company. They were just too corrupt and wanted too much money, and so they bought off some politicians and some government officials, and therefore let's go prosecute them. In which case what happens is at that point, Pfizer pleads to some minor minor crime. They set up, they already have shell companies set up for these The purpose is that those will plead guilty and, they will pay some big fine, which the government will take and distribute to themselves. And this will be continued in the future because this happened already many times before.
So that's why they're setting them up. They're going to throw them under the bus in a manner that doesn't hurt anyone really involved, like Albert Bourla, and, you know, they're all protected. And that's what they want people to focus on, not on the actual crime as it happened.
My interview with Taylor Hudak on the Global Covid Crime
Visit my substack for more information: https://sashalatypova.substack.com
We are no longer in a world in which standard pharmaceutical practices and good manufacturing practices apply. Instead, Sasha says, we are in a strange dystopian state of "p…
bitchute.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"Pfizer’s agreement is an OTA and therefore not subject to FAR or FDA regulations, the judge points it out here ... He then states that the DOD is free to injure and kill the service members whichever way they please …" https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/brook-jacksons-case-dismissed-by
Brook Jackson's case dismissed by Judge Truncale.
Judge sides with Pfizer's lawyers and DOJ, as expected
sashalatypova.substack.com
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"This Court will not veto the DoD's judgments concerning mission effectiveness during a national emergency." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jThJorNXtZI https://t.co/hhJUl2QT93 https://t.co/B1tZ8q3D4B
Video Transcript AI Summary
The court upheld the Department of Defense's authority in national emergencies and noted that the army's agreement with fighter didn't address clinical trial conduct. This conclusion is concerning as it suggests the judge's decision was based on complex reasoning rather than the accuracy of Miss Jackson's claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This court will not veto the Department of Defense judgments concerning mission effectiveness during a national emergency, and the judge went on to point out that the deal between the army and fighter didn't regulate the conduct of the clinical trials. How convenient. This is a troubling conclusion. It would appear that the judge dismissed this case not because miss Jackson's claims were incorrect, but rather a higher order level of complex decision making rationale directed his decision.
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
"while a lot of people were saying “Pfizer's liable! Pfizer's liable!” ... in fact what played out in court is the judge pointed to that clause and said “Oh, look - it's out of scope; the government was not supposed to pay for this.”" —@sasha_latypova https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_bNs0pk5bA https://t.co/Fe2RnRohKJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Pfizer filed a motion to dismiss fraud allegations, arguing that the US government contracts did not require valid clinical trials or evidence of safety and efficacy. They claimed that the contracts were more like prototype exercises, and the government accepted the unlawful conduct. The contracts were reviewed and found to be deceitful, with contradictory clauses. While there was language about manufacturing practices and compliance, a specific clause stated that clinical trials and good manufacturing practice compliance were not part of the contract. The judge dismissed the case based on this clause, stating that the government was not supposed to pay for those aspects, so no fraud occurred.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's talk about Pfizer's defense. It filed a motion to dismiss April 22nd last year arguing that no fraud had occurred and no fraud could have occurred because none of the US government DOD contracts required valid clinical trials or evidence of safety or efficacy as a condition for payment. Such as the contracts show that the government agreed to a prototype exercise type of contract. So no matter what Pfizer did in terms of safety, according to Pfizer and the US government is not actually illegal because the client, the in government, accepted the unlawful conduct. Your thoughts.
Speaker 1: Yes. I wrote extensively reviewing Pfizer contracts. They have separate they have multiple contracts and they're kind of fall into 2 categories. 1 is Manufacturing, the other one is is what's called technical direction letter and that's where the, the the they used it the one that they used in the motion to dismiss. And so, I wrote on my Substack, sasholotepawet.
Substack.com. You can find detailed analysis of these contracts. And, yes, the when I read them, they're written in a very deceitful way. You know, they are They use a lot of language to confuse and to write internally contradicting, seemingly contradictory clauses. So in a well written contract, All the clauses supporting the subject of the contract and they're supposed to all work together toward, you know, explaining how that subject of the contract is going to occur.
In this contract I was surprised to see that they have clauses that contradict each other. In some places, for example, a lot of language mentions good manufacturing practices that the vaccines are gonna be safe and effective, that they're going to comply, with pharmaceutical laws, but it's kinda like language, fluff language. When you come to the Things that are, you know, potentially enforceable, such as, for example, specific clause about the scope of the contract, then in that clause it says explicitly that Clinical trials and clinical, and good manufacturing practice compliance are out of the scope of this project, out of the scope of the contract. And then, in fact, what judge Trankhield cited in his Dismissal of this case, that that was the case. So that one.
So while a lot of people were saying, well, Pfizer's liable, Pfizer's liable. Look. There's all this language about the manufacturing practice compliance. In fact, what what played out in court is judge pointed to that clause and said, oh, look, it's out of scope. The government was not supposed to pay for this.
And so you can't say the government was defrauded.
@ZombyWoof2022 - Dr. ZW
@sasha_latypova "Fraud was the essential part of the Operation Warp Speed from the start, it was known to the regulators and DOD and pharma, it was expected, it was in fact required, it was and remains essential to this program." sashalatypovaDOTsubstackDOTcom/p/omg-sv40-pfizer-can-be-sued-now https://t.co/jtsT64wKZL
