TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @_BlakeHabyan
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently learned about a simulation called Catastrophic Contagion, run by the Bill Gates Foundation, which anticipates a deadly enterovirus outbreak named ‘SEERS’ in 2025. This virus is projected to have a higher fatality rate than COVID-19, particularly affecting children. The highlights from the tabletop exercise reveal discussions on lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on societal control, propaganda, and the response of church leadership and public institutions. This simulation involved collaboration with The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the WHO.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
🚨 How many people are aware that the Bill Gates Foundation ran a simulation for a deadly pandemic in 2025? That’s right. Catastrophic Contagion is a simulation for an enterovirus outbreak called ‘SEERS’ with a higher fatality rate than COVID and this time disproportionately affecting children. Here is a highlights reel from the tabletop exercise. The pannel reflects on lessons from COVID-19, including societal control, propaganda, and church closures, critiquing Church leadership and public institutions. This simulation was a partnership between The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Health Organization (WHO), and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Officials in two Latin American countries have reported outbreaks of a new infectious disease, severe epidemic enterovirus respiratory syndrome 2025, with 500 confirmed or suspected cases in the last six weeks. Without effective containment, this virus poses a risk of a severe pandemic. National leadership is crucial for managing the outbreak, and local responses must be supported. Training and equipping local health workers, along with fostering trust among populations, are essential. As of now, there are an estimated 1 billion cases globally, resulting in over 20 million deaths, including nearly 15 million children. Successful countries had invested in pandemic preparedness, with dedicated teams conducting operational planning and drills. Greater participation and adherence to guidance could have reduced the impact significantly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Officials in 2 Latin American countries alerted the WHO of several outbreaks of a new infectious disease that's mysteriously appearing across the region, severe epidemic enterovirus respiratory syndrome 2025. Over the past 6 weeks alone, there have been 500 confirmed or suspected cases reported. The virus could cause a severe pandemic if early containment and mitigation efforts are not successful.
Speaker 1: The pandemic in this type of situation and trend, would be a risk for the global health security. Pandemics are inherently political, financial, and so much broader.
Speaker 2: We have not spoken on the leadership in country, and I think that we need to be also very careful. We cannot decide a lot of things without the leaders be involved and agree on that.
Speaker 1: There is no substitute for national leadership.
Speaker 2: It's important to support the local response or the national response.
Speaker 1: Training those that are in these areas first, enabling them with the tools, protecting them, and if need be regional solidarity first. At this stage, communication is key, and communication should include not just scientists with data, but also social, religious, and political leaders. Trust. This is an essential issue, and trust was broken among countries, between populations and health care systems, between health care systems and governments.
Speaker 2: I'm very sorry to say that in, 2025, we need to strengthen the health system. WHO needs to be a voice for the voiceless.
Speaker 1: No one is safe until all of us are safe.
Speaker 3: As of today, there have been an estimated 1,000,000,000 cases worldwide with more than 20,000,000 deaths including nearly 15,000,000 children. Countless millions are alive but left with paralysis or brain damage. The most successful countries are those which invested in preparedness and trained for this moment years in advance. This included having full time pandemic preparedness and response teams, which conducted detailed operational planning and routinely tested those plans through exercises and drills. If more countries had participated and heeded the guidance, the toll might have been much less.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared estimates from Ed Dowd about the global impact of COVID vaccines: 7.5-15 million killed, 29-60 million disabled, and 500-900 million injured, with 5 billion receiving mRNA shots. Notably, there have been zero arrests despite widespread agreement on this untested vaccine.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
🚨 Global COVID ‘vaccine’ damage estimates by ex-BlackRock executive, whistleblower, Ed Dowd: 🔹 K*lled: 7.5 – 15 million people 🔹 Disabled: 29 – 60 million people 🔹 Injured: 500 – 900 million people 🔹 5 billion people received mRNA shot(s) To add: 🔹 Arrests made: zero Notice that the world appears to be in a constant wars, but in a matter of months every country magically agreed to use an untested, experimental ‘vaccine’ with lipid nanoparticles.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Approximately 5 billion people globally have received some form of vaccine. Based on U.S. death rates, it's estimated that between 7 million to 15 million individuals may have died due to vaccines. A study by Dennis Rancourt suggests a higher estimate of 17 million. For disabilities, applying a 4 to 1 ratio to the death estimates indicates that 29 million to 60 million people could be disabled globally. Regarding injuries, using data from Pfizer, estimates suggest that between 500 million to 900 million individuals may have experienced injuries that did not result in disabilities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Else do we need to know?
Speaker 1: Alright. So let me roll things up into the global estimates. And it's it's now you know, we're using some back of the envelope
Speaker 0: math, which is what we do as portfolio managers and analysts on Wall Street. So this is
Speaker 1: I gave you the US numbers, which we've done a lot of work on. So how do you estimate global? Well, you make some assumptions. So we estimate that around 5,000,000,000 individuals that we've got that's been widely reported got the vaccine on the planet. So
Speaker 0: 5,000,000,000 got which vaccine?
Speaker 1: Just all vaccines. So that's that's why we give these huge ranges.
Speaker 0: Including the Sinovacs and the Sputnik and
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Well, not yeah. It's there.
That that that's that's why that's why we give these wide ranges because we don't wanna over, overestimate. But
Speaker 0: K.
Speaker 1: So 5,000,000,000, people on the planet got a vaccine of some sort. If you apply the range of the death rate, in the US that I gave you earlier, you get a, a range of globally 7,300,000 to 15,000,000 died from the vaccine. And that 7,000,000 to 15,000,000? Yeah. And so let's let's there's been a study by Dennis Rancourt.
He we've looked at his methodology. It's different than what we do. We're not saying it's wrong. It's it's it's it's an estimate, and he came up with 17,000,000, which I think you talked about. So our upper our upper range is right there with Dennis Rancourt.
Okay? Disabilities, when you look at the ratio of 4 to 1, you multiply the 7,000,000 and the 15 possibly 15,000,000 times 4, you get a range of 29 to, let me see. I gotta look at the numbers. 29 to 60,000,000 disabled globally. Okay?
Speaker 0: 29 to 60,000,000 disabled globally. Correct.
Speaker 1: And then injuries, if you take 18% of the vaccinated for just using the clip the Pfizer. So that, again, this could be money, but we get a range of, at the high end, 900,000,000, 500,000,000 at the low end. Injured.
Speaker 0: 500,000,000 to 900,000,000 who had an injury that has not disabled?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Correct.
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a clip worth sharing, especially in light of recent events in Colorado. In it, George Soros expresses his commitment to engaging in the electoral process in the U.S. He mentions his financial support for those who advocate for an open society through his foundations. This raises concerns about efforts to undermine the United States and impose a globalist agenda. I encourage you to watch the full clip to understand the context better.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Watch: Remember When Hillary Clinton Praised George Soros? With the recent news in Colorado, this clip deserves to be shared. Soros says, “I need to stand up and do something and become really engaged in the electoral process in this country [USA]. In my foundations, basically, I have provided financial support for people in those countries who believe in the idea of an open society.” You are seeing an effort to break down the United States and force a globalist order upon it. Watch the entire clip for yourself.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Reminder: All Wars Are Bankers Wars - Full Length Documentary: As war tensions continue escalating, keep this in mind. https://t.co/7U7c3UGvqM
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video discusses the role of private central banks in causing wars and conflicts around the world. It argues that all wars are ultimately fought for the benefit of these banks, as they seek to control nations and their economies. The video provides historical examples, such as the American Revolution and World War II, to support this claim. It also highlights the dangers of private central banking and calls for a return to state-issued currencies. The video concludes by urging people to recognize the true cause of wars and to stand against private central banks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now, I want to share a story with you and this is actually an article that I wrote over the weekend called All Wars Are Bankers' Wars. And I went in, I did a lot of research, it's posted to the front page of whatreallyhappened.com. I understand it's already gone viral, it's being reposted around the web. But I wanted to basically tell it to you here on the radio show. And it's a very long story, we're probably going to take the rest of the hour to do it, but it's something that you need to understand that all of these wars and assassinations that we're told are crazed alone, not assassins, or weapons of mass destruction, or bringing democracy, all of them track back to the private central bankers as the initiating event.
And the more you study this, the more you will realize all the wars are wars for the bankers, for the private central bankers. And I know a lot of people are going to have difficulty comprehending this, just how many of these wars we have fought as a nation were fought for no other purpose than to force private central banks onto nations that did not want them. So we're going to have a few examples, so you understand why at this particular time in history, the United States government is mired in so many wars against so many foreign nations, and there's plenty of precedence for this. Now, going back to the beginning, the United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King George III's Currency Act, which forced the colonists to abandon their own government issued currencies and conduct business only using printed banknotes, borrowed at interest from the Bank of England. If you go back to the writings of Ben Franklin, direct quote, the refusal of King George III to allow the colonies to operate an honest money system, which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators was probably the prime cause of the revolution, that's Ben Franklin.
Now our public schools don't teach that, because you're not supposed to know that the bankers were really behind the American Revolution. After the revolution, the United States adopted a revolutionary radically different economic system in which the government issued its own value based currency, so that private banks couldn't skim the wealth of the people through interest bearing banknotes. So the American Revolution was fought primarily to free the American people from King George III's Currency Act, which ordered them to conduct all business using printed banknotes borrowed at interest from the Bank of England. So, the Bank of England was just raking in wealth from the labor of the American people in exchange for ink and paper and that fueled the anger that led to the American Revolution. Your public schools don't spend a lot of time on that, but that was really what it was all about.
So the revolution was over, the United States was born, but the private bankers are nothing if not dedicated to their schemes to acquire other people's wealth and they knew full well how easy it is to corrupt a nation's leaders. Now just 1 year after Mayor Amschel Rothschild had uttered his infamous, let me issue and control the nation's money and I care not who makes the laws, private bankers succeeded in setting up a new private central bank called the First Bank of the United States, largely through the efforts of the Rothschild's chief supporter in the United States, Alexander Hamilton. Now this First Bank of the United States was founded in 17/91 and by the end of its 20 year charter, the First Bank of the United States had almost ruined the nation's economy, while enriching the bank's owners. As a result, Congress refused to renew the charter and signal their intention to go back to a state issued value based currency on which the people paid no interest at all to any banker. This resulted in a threat from Nathan Mayer against the US government.
Either the application for renewal of the charter is granted or the United States will find itself involved in a most disastrous war. Congress still refused to renew the charter for the First Bank of the United States, whereupon Nathan Mayer Rothschild railed, 'Teach those impudent Americans a lesson, bring them back to colonial status.' Financed by the Rothschild Control Bank of England, Britain then launched the war of 18/12 to recolonize the United States and force them back into the slavery of the Bank of England's bank notes or to plunge the United States into so much debt, they would have they would be forced to accept a new private central bank and the plan worked. Even though the United States won the war of 18/12, Congress was forced to grant a new charter for yet another private bank issuing the public currency as loans at interest, the 2nd Bank of the United States. Once again, private bankers were in control of the nation's money supplied and cared not who made the laws or how many British or American soldiers had to die for it. So once again, the nation was plunged into debt, unemployment, poverty by the predations of the private central bank and in 18/32, Andrew Jackson successfully campaigned for his 2nd term as President under the slogan Jackson and no bank.
True to his word, Jackson succeeded in blocking the renewal of the charter for the second Bank of the United States of America. And this was where that famous quote came from Andrew Jackson. Gentlemen, I too have been a close observer of the doings of the Bank of the United States. I have had men watching you for a long time and I'm convinced that you've used the funds of the banks to speculate in the bread stuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you and when you lost, you charged it to the bank.
You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul the charter, I shall ruin 10,000 families. That may be true gentlemen, but that is your sin. Should I let you go on, you will ruin 50,000 families and that would be my sin. You are a den of vipers and thieves. I've determined to route you out and by the eternal God, I will route you out.
Andrew Jackson. Shortly after the charter for the 2nd Bank of the United States expired, there was an assassination attempt on Andrew Jackson and it failed when both pistols used by the assassin, Richard Lawrence, failed to fire. Later on, Lawrence explained the motive for the assassination by saying that with President Jackson dead, money would be more plenty. So, it was an assassination motivated by the interests of the bankers. Now, our public school system is as subservient to the bankers wishes to keep certain history from you, just as the corporate media is subservient to Monsanto's wishes to keep the dangers of GMOs from you and the global warming cult's wishes to conceal from you, the fact that earth has actually been cooling for the last 16 years.
So, it should probably be no surprise that the financial dimension of the Civil War are not well known to the average American. It's portrayed in our history books and our popular media as an internal dispute over slavery, but in fact, it was a war with global implications. When the Confederacy seceded from the United States, the bankers once again saw the opportunity for a rich harvest of debt and offered to fund Lincoln's efforts to bring the South back into the Union at at 30% interest. Lincoln remarked that he would not free the black man by enslaving the white man to the bankers and using his authority as President, issued a new government currency, the greenback. This was a direct threat to the wealth and power of the central bankers who quickly London Times following Lincoln's issuance of the Greenbacks.
If this mischievous financial policy, which its origin in North America shall become endurated down to a fixture, then that government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains and wealth of all countries will go to North America.
That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe. So goaded by the private bankers, much of Europe supported the Confederacy against the Union, with the expectation that victory over Lincoln would mean the end of the Greenback. France and Britain seriously considered an outright invasion on the United States in support of the Confederacy, but they were held at bay by Russia.
Speaker 1: A little bit
Speaker 0: of history most Americans don't understand, Russia came to the aid of Lincoln's Union during this crisis. At that time, Russia had just ended their serfdom system and they had a state central bank similar to the system the United States had been founded on. Now, free of European intervention, the Union won the war and Lincoln announced his intention to go on issuing the greenbacks. Following Lincoln's assassination, the greenbacks were pulled from circulation and the American people forced to go back to an economy based on banknotes borrowed at interest from the private bankers. So finally, in 1913, the private central bankers of Europe, in particular the Rothschilds of Great Britain, the Warburgs of Germany, met with their American financial collaborators on Jekyll Island, Georgia to form a new banking cartel with the express purpose of forming the Third Bank of the United States with the aim of placing complete control of the United States money supply once again under the control of private bankers.
Owing to hostility over the previous banks of the United States, the name of this third bank was changed to the Federal Reserve, in order to grant the new bank a quasi governmental image, but in fact, it is a privately owned bank. It's no more federal than Federal Express. In fact, last year, the Federal Reserve successfully rebuffed a Freedom of Information Law suit by Bloomberg News on the grounds that as a private banking corporation and not actually a part of the U. S. Government, 19 13 proved to be a transformative year for the nation's economy.
1st with Congress passage of the 16th income tax amendment and the false claim it had been ratified. Here's another direct quote. I think if you were to go back and try and find and review ratification for the 16th Amendment, which was the internal revenue, the income tax, I think if you went back and examine that carefully, you would find that a sufficient number of states never ratified that amendment. That's US District Court Judge James C. Fox in Sullivan versus United States 2003.
Later that same year, 1913, and apparently unwilling to risk another questionable amendment, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act over the Christmas holiday in 1913 while members of Congress opposed to the measure were at home. This was a very underhanded deal as Constitution explicitly best Congress with the authority to issue the public currency, does not authorize its delegation and thus would have required a new amendment to transfer that authority to a private bank. But pass it, Congress did and President Woodrow Wilson signed it as he promised the bankers he would in exchange for generous campaign contributions. Now, President Wilson later regretted that decision. You've probably heard this quote before, but you're going to get it again.
I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit. We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men. That was Woodrow Wilson writing in 1919.
Now, 1 year after the passage of the Federal Reserve Act, World War I started and it is important to remember that prior to the creation of the Federal Reserve, there was no such thing as a World War. Now World War I actually started between Austria, Hungary and Serbia, but quickly shifted to focus on Germany. Why Germany? They didn't start the war. Why was Germany the villain in World War I?
Well, the real reason was their industrial capacity was seen as an economic threat to Great Britain. Great Britain's pound was already in decline at the time, because too much economic emphasis was on banking and finance and not enough was on agricultural development, industrial development and infrastructure. It's very much like the situation we have in the United States right now. All the financial operatives, they want to play the Wall Street games and other parts of the economy are being neglected. We've lost a great deal of our manufacturing, we're not the agricultural exporter we used to be because everybody is over there at Wall Street playing in that giant open air casino.
Now, pre war Germany did have a private central bank, but it was under strict control by the German government to keep inflation at reasonable levels and to make sure that all of the German economy was being properly funded, just like Putin did with their central bank about a month ago. Under government control by the German government, investment was guaranteed to internal economic development and as a result, Germany had become a major manufacturing technological power. They were exporting opponent of World War I and not just defeated, it was flattened. Now following the Treaty of Versailles, Germany was ordered to pay the war costs of all the participating nations, even though Germany had not started that war. This amounted to 3 times the value of all of Germany itself.
Germany's private central bank to which the German government had gone deeply into debt to pay the cost of the wars was allowed to break free of government control that led to the massive inflation of the Weimar Republic, followed permanently trapping the German people in endless debt and money speculators were running rampant and it led to these situations where you had literally a whole basket full of paper notes to get a loaf of bread. Now, when the Weimar republic collapsed economically, it opened the door for the national socialist to take power. Their first financial move was to issue their own state currency, which was not borrowed from private central banks. It was based on the unit of value, not a unit of debt. Freed from having to pay interest on the money in circulation, Germany and quickly began to rebuild its industry.
It was an amazing transformation to see. The media called it the German miracle. Time Magazine lionized Hitler for the amazing improvement of life for the German people and the explosion of German industry and they even named him Time Magazine's Man of the Year in 1938. Then once again, Germany's prosperity and freedom from a private central bank loaning the public currency at interest became a threat to other nations and other powers. I have a couple of quotes here from Winston Churchill that tells you what was really going through the minds of Europe in the years leading up to World War II.
Which means do business. Should Germany merchandise again in the next 50 years? We have led this war, World War I in vain. That was Winston Churchill writing in the Times in 1919. Another quote, we will force this war upon Hitler if he wants it or not.
Winston Churchill in a 1936 radio broadcast. 'Germany becomes too powerful, we have to crush it.' Winston Churchill in November 1936 speaking to U. S. General Robert Wood, This war is an English war and its goal is the destruction of Germany. Winston Churchill, autumn 1939 broadcast.
So it was all about economics and profitability. Now, Germany's state issued value based currency was also a direct threat to the wealth and power of the private central banks around the world. And as early as 1933, they started to organize a global boycott against Germany to strangle this upstart ruler who thought he could run his nation without a private central bank. Now as had been the case in World War I, Great Britain and other nations threatened by Germany's economic power looked for an excuse to go to war. And as public anger in Germany grew over the boycott, Hitler foolishly gave them that excuse.
Years later in a spirit of candor, the real reasons for the war were made clear. The war wasn't only about fascism, but to conquer sales markets. We could have, if we had intended so, prevented this war from breaking out without doing one shot, but we didn't want to. Winston Churchill to Harry Truman, March 1946. One more quote here.
Germany's unforgivable crime before World War II was its attempt to loosen its economy out of the world trade system and to build up an independent exchange system from which the world finance couldn't profit anymore. We butchered the wrong pig. Winston Churchill writing in his book, the Second World War. Now, a little side note, we're going to actually step back in time to the years before World War II. Little bit of history a lot of Americans are still completely unaware of and it involves a gentleman by the name of Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler.
In 1933, Wall Street bankers and financiers had bankrolled Harriman in New York and they're still there, I saw them when I was there for the 9/11 anniversary. They were financing right up to the day war was declared with Germany and these Wall Street financers decided that a fascist dictatorship in the United States based on the one Mussolini had in Italy was going to be far better for their business interests than Roosevelt's New Deal, which threatened massive wealth redistribution to the working and middle classes of America. So the Wall Street tycoons recruited General Butler to lead the overthrow of the U. S. Government and install a Secretary of General Affairs, who would be answerable to Wall Street and not the people, would crush social unrest and shut down all the labor unions.
General Butler pretended to go along with the scheme, but then exposed the plot to Congress. So they recruited Major General, Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler to lead this coup d'etat because Butler was very popular with the soldiers and his image as part of this move would help convince the military this was the right thing to do. Now, to his credit, Major General Smedley Butler remembering his oath to the Constitution, pretended to go along with the scheme, but then exposed the plot to the United States Congress. Congress then is now in the pocket of Wall Street bankers refused to act. When Roosevelt learned of the planned coup, he demanded the arrest of the plotters, but the plotters simply reminded Roosevelt that if any one of them were sent to prison, their friends on Wall Street would deliberately collapse the still fragile US economy and blame Roosevelt for it.
So Roosevelt was unable to do anything about this attempted coup d'etat until the start of World War II at which time he prosecuted many of the plotters under the Trading with the Enemy Act. Now, mostly it was glossed over, it was just a rumor it's a conspiracy theory, but in 1967, the congressional minutes of Smedley Butler's revelation to Congress of the an attempted military takeover of the United States of America was based loosely on this story, but of course in the movie, the bankers being behind the Burt Lancaster character was completely removed from the script here. Now, Smedley Butler is also famous for writing a work called War is a Racket, and I would like to read you a quote from that. I spent 33 years and 4 months in active military service as a member of our country's most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from 2nd Lieutenant to Major General and during that period I spent more of my time being a high class muscle man for big business, for Wall Street and for the bankers.
In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time, now I'm sure of it. Like all members of the military profession, I never had an original thought until after I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation, while I obeyed the orders of the higher ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service.
Thus, I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interest in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American Republics for the benefit of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 19 09 through 1912.
I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American Sugar Interests in 1916. In China in 1927, I helped see to it that the standard oil went its way molested. During those years, I had, as the boys in the backroom would say, a swell racket. I was rewarded with honors, medals and promotion. Looking back on it, I feel I might have given Al Capone a few hints.
The best he could do was operate his racket in 3 city districts, I operated on 3 continents. General Smedley Butler, former U. S. Marine Corps Commandant and he wrote that in 1935. Now moving forward here, as President, John Fitzgerald Kennedy understood the predatory nature of Private Central Banking.
He understood why Andrew Jackson fought so hard to end the Second Bank of the United States. So Kennedy wrote and signed Executive Order 11,110, which ordered the U. S. Treasury to issue a new public currency called the United States Note. Now Kennedy's United States Notes were not borrowed from the Federal Reserve.
They were created by the U. S. Government and backed by the silver piles held by the U. S. Government.
It represented a return to the system of economics the United States had been founded on and it was perfectly legal for Kennedy to do so under the Constitution. All told, some $4,500,000,000 went into the public circulation, which eroded interest payments to Federal Reserve and loosened their control over the nation. 5 months after signing Executive Order 11,110, John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas and the United States notes pulled from circulation and destroyed. Following Kennedy's assassination, John J.
McCloy, President of the Chase Manhattan Bank and President of the World Bank was named to the Warren Commission. Now, I don't care how good a banker he is, he's not qualified to be investigating a murder, which is what we were told the Warren Commission was all about, to get the truth of the assassination. But we all know that the Warren Commission was there to cover up what was going on and obviously we can presume safely that John J. McCloy's presence on the Warren Commission was to make sure the American public never got even a hint of the financial dimensions behind the assassination. So, as we enter the 11th year of what I am certain future history will most certainly describe as World War III, we need to examine the financial dimensions behind all these wars.
Why are we here? Why are our children being killed and crippled? Is this another war for the profit of the private central bankers? And the answer is, yes. Now toward the end of World War II, when it became obvious that the Allies were going to win and dictate the post war political environment, the major world economic powers met at Bretton Woods, a luxury resort in 1944 and they hammered out the Bretton Woods agreement for international finance.
The British pound lost its position as the global trade and reserve currency to the U. S. Dollar. There are indications this was part of the price demanded by Roosevelt in exchange for the U. S.
Entry into the war. Now, absent the economic advantages of being the world's go to currency, Britain was forced to nationalize their Bank of England in 1946. The Bretton Woods agreement ratified in 1945 in addition to making the dollar the global reserve and trade currency obligated the signatory nations to tie their currencies to the dollar. The nations that ratified Bretton Woods did so on 2 conditions. The first was that the Federal Reserve would refrain from ink and paper.
It basically was an imperial tax imposed by the U. S. Economic system on the rest of the world. That assurance of no over printing was supposedly backed up by second requirement, which was that the U. S.
Dollar would always be convertible back to gold by the U. S. Government at $35 an ounce. Now, of course, the Federal Reserve being a private bank and not answerable to the U. S.
Government did in fact start over printing paper dollars, which were sent to other nations around the world and under Bretton Woods they had to send back products and produce and raw materials at full value and much of the perceived American prosperity of the 1950s 60s was the result of these foreign nations having the for these little pieces of paper with ink all over them, because they were forced to accept these paper notes as being worth $35 per ounce of gold. Then in 1970, France started looking at this huge pile of printed paper notes sitting in their bank vaults for which real French to return all those paper notes for gold at the agreed upon $35 per ounce exchange rate. The problem was the United States had nowhere near the goal to redeem all those paper notes. So on August 15, 1971, Richard Nixon temporarily, nudge, nudge, wink, wink, say no more, suspended gold convertibility of the US Federal Reserve notes. This 'Nixon Shock' as it was termed at the time, effectively ended Bretton Woods and many global currencies started to de link from the US dollar and it created another problem because the United States had been collateralizing their money borrowed from other governments and foreign investors with the American Nations Gold Reserves and with the awareness that there wasn't enough gold to redeem all the Federal Reserve Foreign nations began to get very nervous about the loans to the United States and they were understandably reluctant to loan any additional money without some form of collateral.
So what Richard Nixon did is he founded the environmental movement with the EPA and its various programs like wilderness zones and roadless areas and heritage rivers, wetlands and all these other little different programs, which all took vast areas of public lands and made them off limits to the American people who are technically the owner of all those lands. But Nixon had no concern for the environment and the real purpose of this land grab under the guise of the environment was to pledge those pristine lands and their vast mineral resources as collateral on the outstanding national debt. The multitude of all these different programs was simply to conceal the scale of the land grab and collateralization of the American people's heritage. And it actually today covers almost 25% of the entire nation is now locked up by these EPA programs and pledged its collateral on government borrowing. Now with open lands, available lands for collateralization already in short supply, the U.
S. Government embarked on a new program to shore up sagging international demand for the dollar. The United States approached the world's oil producing nations, mostly in the Middle East and offer them a deal in exchange for only selling their oil per dollars, the United States would guarantee the military safety of those oil rich nations. The oil rich nations would agree to spend and invest their U. S.
Paper dollars inside the United States, particularly in U. S. Treasury bonds, which would be redeemable through future generations of U. S. Taxpayers.
The concept was labeled the petrodollar. In effect, the United States no longer able to back the dollar with gold was now backing it with oil, other people's oil and that necessity to keep control over those oil nations to prop up the dollar has dominated America's foreign policy in the region ever since. But as America's manufacturing and the and Treasury bonds piling up in their vaults and there really wasn't all that much except real estate they wanted to buy from the United States of America. Europe's cars and aircraft were superior and less costly. In more recent times, America's experiment with GMO food crops has led a lot of nations to simply avoid buying U.
S. Agricultural exports. Israel's constant belligerence against its neighbors has caused the oil producing nations to wonder if the U. S. Could actually keep their end of the petrodollar arrangement.
So, oil producing nations started to talk of selling their oil for whatever currency the purchasers wanted to pay. Iraq already somewhat hostile to the United States following Desert Storm demanded the right to sell their oil for euros in 2,000. In 2002, the United Nations agreed that Iraq had a right to sell their oil for euros under the Oil for Food program. 1 year later, 2003, the United States re invaded Iraq, lynched Saddam Hussein and placed Iraq's oil back on the world market only available for U. S.
Dollars. Now the clear U. S. Policy shift following 9/11 away from at least attempting to appear to be an impartial broker of peace in the Mideast to one of unquestioned support for Israel's aggressions only further eroded confidence in the petrodollar deal and even more oil producing nations started openly talking of trading their oil for other global currencies. So over in Libya, had instituted a state central bank and a value based trade currency, the Gold Dinar.
Kadafi then announced that Libya's oil was for sale, but only for the Gold Dinar. Other African nations seeing the rise of the Gold Dinar and the Euro even as the U. S. Dollar continued its inflation driven decline, flocked to the new Libyan currency for trade. This move had the potential to seriously undermine the global hegemony of the dollar.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy reportedly went so far as to call Libya a threat to the financial security of the world. So the United States invaded Libya under the guise of supporting a popular rebellion, they brutally murdered Gaddafi, apparently because the object lesson of Saddam's lynching had not been enough of a message, imposed a private central bank and returned Libya's oil output to dollars only. The goal that was supposed to be made into the gold in ours as of last report I could find unaccounted for. Now according to General Wesley Clark, the master plan for the dollarification of the world's oil nations included 7 targets, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. Venezuela which has started selling their oil to China for the yuan seems to be a late addition.
What is notable about those original 7 nations targeted by the U. S. Is that none of them are members of the Bank of International Settlements. This is the private central bankers, private central bank located in Switzerland. That meant that those 7 targeted nations were deciding for themselves how to run their nation's economies rather than submitting to the international private central bankers.
Now, of course, the bankers gun sites are on Iran, which dares to have a government central bank and sell their oil for whatever currency they choose. The war agenda for Iran is as always to force Iran's oil to be sold only for dollars and to force them to accept a privately owned Central Bank. Now, you have been raised by a public school system and a media that constantly assures you that the reasons for all these wars and assassinations are many and varied. We're bringing democracy to the conquered lands. We hear that a lot when actually the US hasn't.
The usual result of a US overthrow is the imposition of a pro business, pro Wall Street, pro US dictatorship. Good example, the 1953 CIA overthrow of Iran's democratically elected government of Mohammed Mosaddegh and the imposition of the Shah or the 1973 CIA overthrow of Chile's elected government of President Salvador Allende and the imposition of the dictator, Augusto Pinochet. Another one of the excuses we'll get is, we have to save the people from a cruel oppressor, that's the one they're using in Syria right now. Revenge for 9eleven, that was a big one going into Iraq and then later on President Bush was caught on video saying, no, Iraq had nothing to do with 911. And behind all of them that tired, worn out, catch all excuse for invasion, weapons of mass destruction.
Assassinations are always passed off as crazed, lone nuts to obscure the real agenda. And the real agenda of the bankers is very simple. It is enslavement of the people by creation of a false sense of obligation. Now that obligation is false because the private central banking system by design creates more debt than money with which to pay the debt. There is no way out the way it's set up.
It's impossible to escape as long as you're
Speaker 1: playing by their rules.
Speaker 0: Central banking is not science. It is a religion. It's a set of arbitrary rules created to benefit the priesthood, meaning the bankers and is supported only because people believe this is the way it's supposed to be. It is a religion. It's a set of arbitrary rules created to benefit the priesthood, meaning the owners of the private central banks.
The fraud persists with often lethal results only because the people are brainwashed into believing that this is the way life is supposed to be and no alternative exists or should even be dreamt of. Now this same approach, the same brainwashing was true of 2 earlier systems as illegitimate. So now we are on the verge of a new era in history where we will recognize that rule by debt, rule by private central bankers issuing the public currency as a loan at interest is equally illegitimate. It only works as long as people allow themselves to believe that this is the way life is supposed to be. But you need to understand something that's the core of the issue.
Private central banks do not exist to serve the people, the community or the nation. Private central banks exist to serve their owners to make them rich beyond the dreams of Midas and all for the cost of ink, paper and the right bribe to the right official and lies a single policy of financial dictatorship. The private central bankers only allow rulers to rule only on the promise that the people of a nation be enslaved the private central banks. Rulers who do not go along with that will be killed. Their nation invaded by those other nations still enslaved to the private central banks.
The bankers themselves don't fight these wars. Their children are not in these wars. A nation tries to break free of the private central bankers like Libya. All the other nations under the bankers control pile on and destroy them. This so called clash of civilizations you are being told about by the corporate media, it's really a war between banking systems with the private central bankers forcing themselves onto the rest of the world, no matter how many millions must die for it.
The constant hate mongering against Muslims you see in the corporate media lies in the simple fact. Like the ancient Christians prior to the Knights Templars, Muslims forbid usury or the bid usury or the lending of money at interest because they saw in ancient times like Rome, how these banking practices could destroy an entire society. And that is the reason our government media insist that Muslims have to be hated and killed and converted. They refuse to submit to currencies loaned at interest. They refuse to be debt slaves.
That makes them a threat to the natural order of the world, the new world order of global fascist dictatorship. So, off to war your children must go to spill their blood for the money junkies gold. We barely survived the last 2 world wars. Now we're going into the third one in the nuclear bio weapon age. That is very dangerous.
We have to ask ourselves, are the private central bankers willing to risk incinerating the whole planet to feed their greed? Apparently so. You as parents, as siblings, as spouses need to ask yourself, do you really want to see your loved ones in uniform, killed and crippled all for a bank balance sheet? But the whole point of this article, the whole point of what I'm sharing with you today, and this is all history, you go out and hunt it down for yourself. Behind all the flag waving, behind all the propaganda, behind the craze, lone nut assassins, weapons of mass destruction, all of the modern wars this nation have fought are wars by and for the private bankers, fought and bled for by 3rd parties unaware of the true reason they're expected to gracefully accept being killed and crippled for.
And the process is quite simple. We've explained it before on this show. As soon as the private central bank issues its currency as a loan at interest, the public is forced deeper and deeper into debt. When the people are reluctant to borrow anymore, that's when the keenly and economists demand the government borrow more to keep the pyramid scheme working. When both the people and the government refuse to borrow anymore, that is when the large wars get started to plunge everyone even deeper to debt to pay for the war and then after the war to borrow even more to rebuild and when these horrible wars are over, the ordinary people have basically what they had before the war except their graveyards are a lot larger and everyone is in debt to the private bankers for the next century.
That is why Brown Brothers Herriman in New York was funding the rise of Adolf Hitler because war is the bankers richest harvest. We all need to recognize this is what all these wars have been about. Private central banking, enlarging their domain, imposing their will on nations that do not want it, imposing their system on the rulers of nations who do not want it. Bribery, blackmail, assassination, they will do anything to maintain their stranglehold on the productivity of the world's people. And as long as private central banks are allowed to exist, inevitably as the night follows the day, there will be poverty, hopelessness, millions of deaths in endless world wars until the earth itself is sacrificed in flames to mammon.
The path to true world peace lies in the abolishment of all private central banking everywhere and a return to the state issued value based currencies that allow nations and people to become prosperous through their own labor and development and efforts. Now, I mentioned the Knights Templars. Prior to the Knights Templars, Christianity, like Islam, forbade usury, because Christianity, much of Orthodox Christianity came out of Rome and they had seen firsthand what debt based economies do, even to the Roman Empire. They'd seen it firsthand. So they had a ban on usury and the Knights Templars were able to basically either bribe or blackmail the Pope to get a special dispensation that allowed them to rent money is what they called it.
They didn't call it usury, they called it renting money. A lot of modern predatory banking practices were pioneered by the Knights Templars and they plunged Europe into hopelessly unpayable debt until finally French King Philip IV, otherwise known as Philip the Fair, did the only solution he could do, because he understood as long as you believed in the rules of the bankers, as long as you played by the rules they created to serve themselves, you are hopelessly trapped. And so, Philip thought outside the box and I know he's demonized for it, but in looking at the history of the Templars, it was his last resort. He sent messages to all of the regions in France, secret orders on the same time and the same moment on the same day, all of the Templars were arrested and their commanderies, which is what they call their banks, were broken into looking for looted wealth. They didn't find a lot of it.
It was a paper empire, just like the Federal Reserve is. It's all based on paper. There's no nothing of any real value there. It's all paper notes. And he sent the Templars to prison and execution, except for Scotland and Portugal, where the Pope and King Philip IV really didn't have a lot of control.
I think that the governments of the world, looking at the situation, looking how close we are to seeing this current world conflict emerge into a full blown global thermonuclear war, that maybe they need to start thinking about the wisdom of King Philip the Fair and say it's time to simply grab all these private central bankers all at the same time, so they can't simply skedaddle from one nation to another and come back and try the same thing again, Now, we need to look at these money addicts and look at how they're destroying the entire world around them and it's time for an intervention. It's time for us to become private central banking heretics, to stop believing that this is the way life is supposed to be, because it isn't. It isn't even the way the United States was actually started and they're trying as hard. Look at the destruction of our nation. We used to be the world's greatest nation.
Now, the most generous estimate is we're down to number 16 and still falling. And yet despite the destruction to our nation, its infrastructure, its children, its quality of medical care, the quality of its manufacturing output, we still are compelled somehow to go out and force this same banking system onto the rest of the world at the point of a bayonet. Does that make any sense sense at all? Not to a rational human being, to a money junkie, yeah, it's perfect. But we're really at a crisis point in history and the first step to resolving private central banking rule by manufactured illusion of debt is no more legitimate a system of governance than rule by divine right or rule by slavery.
We all need to recognize the true cause of all the pain and suffering in wars. It's not the terrorists, it's not Al Qaeda. These are just distractions and set pieces put in front of your eyes, so you can't see the very clear pattern behind much of modern human history. It's a war of banking systems with the predatory private central banks seeking to eradicate any nation and any ruler that would dare try and operate their economy outside the control of the private central bankers. That's the real cause for the war.
Is it something you're willing to fight and die for to support these private central bankers? Is it something you're willing to let your sons and daughters and brothers and sisters be blown to bloody bits for, so the money junkies can have their latest fix, just a little tiny bit more gold or a little larger number on the bottom of that brokerage statement, so they can have today's thrill, their fix of money that is bought with the blood of your children? I don't think so. But the time has come to point out what really is the cause of all causes behind all the wars and suffering that our planet is having to endure and our people are having to endure. The common enemy of all humankind are private central banks issuing the public currency as a loan at interest.
And as history will show, they will do anything up to and including global wars to keep their lock on yours and your children's future economic well-being and productivity. We're not a free society. Media will tell us that we're free, but we're not free. We are slaves. Our slave chains are made of paper and that paper is the Federal Reserve note.
Too few of our leaders have tried to stand up to this system of enslavement, usually with lethal results. But if all the people of the world at the same time stand up and say no more private central banks, It will come crashing down just as slavery did, just as rule by divine right did, and then we'll be embarking on a new era in human history where the emphasis on social is on the people and not on the money junkies.
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Naomi Wolf exposes Pfizer documents and discusses the influence of the CCP, WEF, and WHO. She highlights their tactics of buying up resources, influencing institutions, and spreading propaganda. The speech is available at The Summit For Truth. Access the coverage through @ShannonJoyRadio.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Must Watch: Dr. Naomi Wolf Exposes Pfizer Documents & Explains The ‘Why’ Behind COVID Vaccines: What We Can Do Moving Forward: (10/21/23): @naomirwolf delivers a powerful speech at The Summit For Truth, explaining what has been found in Pfizer’s OWN documents. On top of that, she explains what unrestricted warfare by the CCP, WEF, and WHO looks like: “Buying up our ports, buying up our water supplies, buying up our farmland, buying up our president, buying up our agencies, influencing our universities, creating division & confusion, funding propaganda, demoralizing us.” It is a longer clip, so consider playing it on 1.25X speed or bookmarking it for later if you’re short on time. Please share.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the dangers and adverse effects of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, highlighting the accumulation of lipid nanoparticles in various organs, including the ovaries, liver, spleen, adrenals, and brain. They also mention the occurrence of heart damage, blood clots, and neurological disorders as a result of the vaccine. The speaker suggests that the vaccine is part of a larger agenda to harm women and reduce fertility. They argue that the distribution of adverse events is not random and may indicate that the vaccine is a bioweapon. They conclude by emphasizing the need to rebuild institutions and reclaim constitutional rights.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are literally standing. It's like that moment. I'm Jewish, and I'm the, you know, granddaughter, as I often say, of a woman who lost 9 siblings to the holocaust. We're we're at that moment where the liberating forces open the gates of Auschwitz, and and we're witnessing, you know, stacks of bodies, and we're witnessing a global crime unlike any crime in human history ever in scale and in evilness. So in the headlines that these experts immediately began to break, I mentioned 1225 deaths just in those 3 months that the Pfizer documents cover.
Here's one, doctor Robert Chandler, was the lead author on this and he's a sports medicine physician who has treated the Angels and the Lakers, very distinguished. He found and he confirmed something that Bret Weinstein had found, and I think maybe doctor Malone had been in this podcast to a year ago, that you were told that the materials, the lipid nanoparticles, the mRNA, and the spike protein stay in the deltoid, but they don't. Pfizer knew that within 48 hours, they biodistribute to every organ in the human body, and they accumulate in the ovaries, the liver, the spleen, the adrenals, and the brain. And so doctor Chandler showed that the chart showing the materials leaving the deltoid went down like this, and the accumulation went up like that. And that's the first injection.
Our volunteers have found no mechanism whereby these materials leave the body. So you have the first injection, the second injection, the third injection. My husband, who's a PI, legally found a CDC form that, like, in 2021, which has space for 6 injections. That's what was planned. And some countries are up to the 4th 5th injection.
So if you're a woman, those lipid nanoparticles, which are an industrial fat covered in polyethylene glycol, which is a petroleum product, are accumulating in your ovaries with the first injection, more with the second, more with the first booster. And independent midwives and nurses are telling us, as I mentioned, that when women are getting abdominal surgery, now their fallopian tubes are blocked. So Doctor. Flowers in one of the first reports found that even though we were not told this, the FDA and Pfizer knew by May of 2021 that the injections caused heart damage to teenagers. And there was a paper that showed that there were 35 minors who sustained myocarditis or heart damage within a week after receiving the injection.
But this was not a key, a cue for the administration to stop everything and hold a press conference and say, we're so sorry. Kids' hearts are being damaged. They doubled down as you'll see. They did not tell us. In fact, what followed was a huge propaganda campaign that whole summer aimed at teenagers and young adults.
If you will recall, the, you know, the the little stars going to visit the White House to talk about getting vaccinated. By November, they found, as I mentioned this morning, that the injections were not effective in stopping COVID And, in fact, the language in the Pfizer documents is failure of efficacy or vaccine failure. So everything that followed, all the closed businesses, all the careers ruined, all the health ruined, all the deaths, all the disabilities were based on a lie starting in November of 2020. It didn't work from the start and they knew it for the purpose that justified its rollout. In the Pfizer documents, there are masses of adverse events.
There are almost 43,000 adverse events, and they're not what you were told. If you went to the CDC website to look at side effects, it said, you know, fever, a little pain at the injection site, you might feel fatigue. That's not what Pfizer knew would happen. In the Pfizer documents, there there are catastrophic numbers of well, interestingly, number 1 is joint pain. How many people do you know with arthritis type pain subsequent to the injection?
Replacements of shoulders, replacements of hips and knees, people limping who never used to. I know so many, many of them healthy young people. The the large, large categories like industrial scale or neurological, dementias, Alzheimer's, Guillain Barre, strokes, bell's palsy and the other largest tranche has to do with, blood clots, lung clots, leg clots, thrombotic thrombocytopenia damage to blood. And now we know the mechanisms due to the people sitting here and their colleagues. They were some of the first to find the mechanisms for how these shots were damaging hearts and damaging blood and circulation itself and damaging the neurological system.
So many smoking guns were found by this team that should have been front page news all over the world. For instance, one could argue, one could fact check me by saying well there's no cause and effect, you know causation correlation does not equal causation. But in the Pfizer documents, there are reports on strokes and liver damage, and half of the adverse events, serious adverse events, took place within 48 hours after the subject received the injection. Just a coincidence. Just a coincidence.
Exactly right. I could go on but I won't because it's too sad and horrible. I'll tell you that Ed Dowd's research is so interesting because it independently from a separate database confirms what our researchers are finding from a separate database. And in journalism, that's confirmation. When 2 people find the same thing working from 2 different perspectives, that's called confirmed in journalism.
So, what Ed Dowd has reported most recently is that a 1000000 Americans self identified as disabled in the month of August 2023 alone. And what you need to know about the Pfizer documents is that and this this also is confirmed by Ed Dowd's separate research, 62 percent of the adverse events are are women. Of those, 16%, in Pfizer's own words are, quote, reproductive disorders. And in almost every organ system, which is something I don't even understand, you know, liver and neurological and stroke, it's women who disproportionately suffer the adverse events. So this is really a war on women as well as a war on humanity.
I'm gonna skip ahead over other horrors that some of which you heard about this morning, to what I think is the centerpiece of what they're doing, which is, as I mentioned, this attack on fertility. And it's it's it's holistic. It's like every single thing that is involved in a man and a woman of the human species mating and a woman gestating and successfully delivering a baby and successfully nursing the baby get destroyed intentionally. I mean, I have to conclude it's intentional in the Pfizer documents because of the nature of the structure of the research, and I'll explain. I mentioned the lipid nanoparticles in the ovaries.
So I also mentioned that they traverse the placenta and really a mystery to me since scientists have known and you can look it up and find these papers going back 8 or 10 years. It's been known for 10 years that lipid nanoparticles traverse every organ in the human body. Every organ, every barrier God made. Right? And there's actually a prayer in the Hebrew tradition, the Jewish tradition, thanking God for, like, making membranes in the body so that it isn't chaos.
Right? So you can live. But every every barrier that God created in the human body is breached and disrupted by lipid nanoparticles. Doctor Chandler said it's like a shotgun blast to the body. So, of course, it traverses the placenta, and doctor Jim Thorpe, a fetal maternal medicine specialist who has been fired and, like, publicly, you know, reputationally denounced by his institution for his honesty and his concern for his patients and their babies.
He showed, sonograms of impaired placentas, and it's like a netting of calcifications. And then I'm a journalist, so one is not enough. Right? So I solicited other people who deliver babies to see if this is really happening. And 2 independent midwives, one in Sacramento and one in Northern California, have confirmed that they're seeing these calcified placentas that prevent the baby from getting enough nutrients and oxygen, and that these placentas fall apart when the mom gives birth and that the moms are induced, like, months early because the the placentas can't grow enough.
And one one midwife actually sent me a picture of these flattened, shrunken placentas that vaccinated women now have. It's absolutely catastrophic. But not only do they degrade the most sacred space on the planet, which is where the baby develops in utero, but Amy Kelly, our incredible COO, otherwise known as the amazing Amy Kelly, who leads the teams, found that the lipid nanoparticles degraded the testes, as I mentioned this morning, in baby boys in utero. And so this degrades the Sertoli cells and the Leydig cells, and I didn't know about this. I learned a lot about what makes men men and what makes women women in this process, but the Sertoli cells and the Leydig cells switch on they're like the factories of masculinity.
They switch on adult manhood at puberty and, help to create, like, deep voices, broad shoulders, your hair on the chest, the ability to father a child, the things that we associate with adult masculinity. So we don't even know if these little boys in utero are going to grow up to be normal men who can father children. There's a section in the Pfizer documents where there's an 80% miscarriage rate. I was fact checked for the initial draft of that, of that report, which found 44%, And AP ran a story and all these fact checkers ran a story saying, Naomi's wrong, it's not 44%. That's right, it's 80%.
They didn't retract their fact checking, by the way, and update the numbers. And not only that, but women were told not to get pregnant in the Pfizer trials, but 270 got pregnant anyway. So Pfizer managed to lose the records of 234 of them, which is illegal. Right? So we don't even know.
That could have been even worse. All the babies could have died for all we know, or the moms could have died. We don't know. But of the 36 women whose records survived till they gave birth or till the end of their pregnancies, over 80% of them lost their babies. You weren't told that.
You weren't told that. Shedding is real. Pfizer Pfizer, officials warn vaccinated men in their studies not to have intercourse with unvaccinated women of childbearing age, and if they do so, to use 2 reliable forms of contraception. So there's something in the semen of vaccinated men, and this may be something for doctor Cole to look at, which is which Pfizer seems to think is injurious either to the woman or to the embryo. It's unclear from the context what their concern is, but they're concerned about it.
They also define exposure to the vaccine as including skin contact and inhalation. Again, there's not that much clarity about that, but it's like they're not they're not saying you can't be exposed to it in other ways. In fact, there are multiple ways they define exposure other than through an injection in your body. We know from the journal andrology that the injections depress sperm count and motility. The Pfizer documents show that lipid nanoparticles, as I mentioned this morning, get into and so does the, polyethylene glycol gets into mom's breast milk.
And so babies are ingesting these materials. Tiny babies, their only food is is mixed with a petroleum byproduct. By the way, polyethylene glycol is an antifreeze. So unsurprisingly, babies are getting sick that nursing from vaccinated moms, and there's this section in the PISA documents where 4 women have who are nursing have blue green breast milk. I like Chamber of Horrors, and this one poor baby who nurses from a vaccinated mom goes into convulsions is rushed to the ER and dies of multi organ system failure.
During the last 2 or 3 years, breastfeeding has gone from 34% of new moms to 14%. I think clearly because babies are getting poisoned milk and this is really bad for the human race because there's this hormonal feedback loop when moms breastfeed their babies which also involves bonding. The baby nursing releases dopamine for the mom and that's part of the bonding process and the baby also bonds through nursing. And so now babies are have I've written this essay about how babies don't look very happy happy anymore, you know, it's not just this, it's like the masking and the weirdness, but they're this fundamental human bonding and mirroring and connection is being disrupted because babies are not experiencing the first food of their lives as nurturing and comforting, but as poisonous. And we're gonna see the effects of this in the next generation psychologically, I'm quite sure, if not also physically.
Note that Abbott, which manufactures baby formula, was taken offline by whom? Remember? The FDA. So they were forcing vaccinated moms to breastfeed their babies poisoned milk. So I'm going to skip ahead.
There's another section in the Pfizer documents. Oh, this is very disturbing. In the Pfizer documents, I mentioned the menstrual dysregulation. There's a chart. And to me as a Jewish woman, the the kind of clinical detachment with which the Pfizer scientists, like, list horrible things they're doing to people without their consent and to babies is very reminiscent of Nazi science.
And anyone who wants to call me a Semite, this this Jew an anti Semite, this Jewish lady, you know, come get me because this is Nazi science, and I will stand forever in memory of my ancestors, and I'll say it. So they create this chart that shows, like, every cell, every line has, like, 15,000 women bleeding every day. 10,000 women, 2 periods a month. You know, 13,000 women, no periods at all, meaning no babies, no fertility at all. You know, 6,000 women, agonizing cramps.
45 100 women, passing tissue and hemorrhaging. You know, it goes on and on and on, horrible things that are being done to women. So it turns out that my warning in 2021 was right and we're suing Twitter. Thank you. But but more importantly, even while now legacy media is running mealy mouthed stories saying, well, studies are showing you might have some menstrual changes with the mRNA injection.
They really downplay it. In fact, in the Pfizer documents of just talking to women, you see that these some of these are disabling conditions. And I'm quite you can't if you're passing tissue or hemorrhaging or having agonizing cramps, you can't be a good soldier or pilot or scientist or mom or, you know, worker of any kind. You can't have a life and and so that it is it it's not just a chart of menstrual irregularity it's a chart of wholesale damage to to lives through, kind of deconstructing the uterus. It seems to be what they've done like deconstructing what what keeps women whole and hormonally, like, healthy.
It's very distressing. So I'm gonna fast forward. There's a section in the Pfizer documents. It's this 8 page pregnancy and lactation report. I mentioned it this morning.
And this showed that 2 babies in utero had died due to, quote, quote, maternal exposure to the vaccine. Quote, maternal exposure to the vaccine. Meaning Pfizer knew that's what killed the babies. This also has a chart showing again, one of those charts showing all these babies sick from nursing their vaccinated moms. This many babies have fever.
This many babies are vomiting. This many babies have tissue swelling, edema. You know, the this many babies are inconsolable. Again, Nazi science, but this time directed at tiny babies. They're observing what happens when they poison the babies without telling the moms.
And they turn in this report on April 20, 21. They turn in this report. To whom do they turn it in? They turn it into the FDA, which means the CDC has it, which means the White House has it. I'll tell you how I know that in a minute.
What happens on April 23, 2021? Doctor Rochelle Walensky holds a White House press conference and announces that if you're pregnant she has this document. She says if you're pregnant, you should get an mRNA vaccine, that there is never a bad time to get vaccinated before you have a baby, while you're pregnant, or after you've had a baby. That's what she tells the pregnant women of America or the women of America who are planning to get pregnant. Evil monsters.
Monsters. Nuremberg 2.0. I'll end with how I know that all those evildoers saw that document and acted on it in that way. Some of the most recent bombshells from our team have to do with a FOIA, meaning a freedom of information act request by an attorney of ours, Ed Berkovich. And the amazing Amy Kelly by the way, her birthday is tomorrow.
The amazing Amy Kelly has gone through these hundreds of pages of FOIA emails heavily redacted, And I just wanna, like, mention that part of the reason these people and the 32100, they are not sitting here and Amy Kelly are so extraordinary extraordinarily heroic is that the labor the nature of the labor they do is so exhausting and detailed and, arduous. You know? And and and and they're literally it's literally a labor of love for humanity. So this is one of those tasks where Amy Kelly went through hundreds and hundreds of pages and lifted out what's germane. Well, it turns out that, the White House communications team, and I know what I'm looking at, is a former adviser to, president Clinton's reelection campaign and a former adviser to the vice president.
I know what the White House communications team is. My my then husband was was a speechwriter for the White House in the Clinton era, and I know what I'm looking at. So the White House communications team is driving this response in May of 2021 to reports of blood clots and heart damage reaching the CDC, doctor Walensky, doctor Fauci, the president, the White House, all these evildoers, doctor Collins, they're all cc'd, Right? And instead of instead of coming clean with us and saying there's blood clots, there's there's thrombotic thrombocytopenia, there's myocarditis, we have to stop. What you see is a script, the White House's words, there are 15 White House staffers driving this effort.
They're all named. And then you see a 100% redacted 17 slides of the script. And that script is what all these people stayed on downplaying myocarditis and to my knowledge not even mentioning blood clots for all of 2021. And you remember what they said about myocarditis in 2021. It's transient.
It's mild. It resolves. No big deal. Well, the second tranche that Amy went through and just posted about showed that the American Association of Pediatricians had warned them, as I said this morning, that it's not mild and it doesn't necessarily resolve and that a whole family needs to work with doctors to make sure that teenager stays alive if they have myocarditis. Well, while all these people and by the way, it's driven by doctor Rachel Levine, which is interesting.
She seems to be the boss of the whole thing. So it seems like doctor Walensky is her junior in this effort and kind of just a front person, but doctor Fauci is CC ed, doctor Collins is CC ed, and there's a template for POTUS to surface the key insights for POTUS. And you know who POTUS is? President of the United States. So our president knew in May of 2021 that teenagers' hearts were being damaged and that people were suffering debilitating, if not fatal, blood clots.
And what did they do? While they're talking about teens hearts being damaged, doctor Walensky takes the time to email a colleague who'd mentioned doctor Paul Offit joining the effort to her, and she said, well, I don't know him personally, but I'm a big admirer and fan blushy face emoticon. So on your taxpayer dollars, Doctor. Walensky was taking the time to be flirty while they're talking about kids being injured almost to death. Monsters.
So what happened later on in 2021? Mandates. And whom did they mandate? They mandated the people you need to keep a nation alive. They mandated the soldiers.
They mandated the sailors. They mandated the special forces, the pharmacists, the nurses, the doctors. They mandated the college students, our next generation. They mandated the school children in some states, the the people who will be the next Americans. And now we're seeing the catastrophic outcome of that which they knew would happen.
And we're seeing predictably a 13 to 20% drop in live births, especially in the West. A 1000000 babies missing in Western Europe, and we're seeing, catastrophic collapse of human reproduction in the West. So the last thing I wanna say to you about this, and then I'm gonna turn to kind of a more hopeful way forward is, like, a a huge question you must be asking by now is why? Why would our own administration laughingly, jokingly roll out something so dangerous and deadly that sterilizes their own people. And this is a piece of information I really think you need to have to add to the picture that you have from all of today about the medical harms.
My independent research found that when you get a Pfizer injection, I haven't had the chance to look at Moderna, but when you get a Pfizer injection, you're not getting an injection from a German company or a German American company. And BioNTech is the subsidiary of Pfizer that makes this injection. You're getting an injection composed and distributed by our existential adversary. Because BioNTech entered into an MOU, which is a memorandum of gigantic, Chinese Communist Pharmaceutical Company in China run by senior officials of the Chinese Communist Party. Not only that, they produced in this MOU a 1000000000 doses but they were not for use in China.
People in China are not given these injections, they are for export. China also opened 14 manufacturing plants in 2021 in Western Europe and 2 in the United States, one in Andover, Massachusetts and one in Princeton, New Jersey. In 2021, BioNTech's SEC filing for the company showed as and I'm a tech CEO so again I understand what I'm looking at, showed as a 100% completed a tech transfer from BioNTech to China. The SCC filing, you can look at it for yourself, it doesn't say to a Chinese individual, it doesn't say to a Chinese company, it says to China. Those are the words.
And what is IP? What is tech? It it could mean anything from formulation to methodology of composition to manufacturing processes, but it means that literally what is in the vial now, and you've heard that Kevin McKernan found that what's in the vial is fragments of DNA and horrible contaminants. Right? The people who produced distributed that got it into your arm are China, then these are people who organ harvest their own citizens, who slaughter their own citizens into their homes, you know, under the pretext of COVID, who put their own Uighur minorities into concentration camps, who force abortions on women as you know.
And as my husband pointing pointed out and he spent his career in military intelligence and in the intelligence community, he said he said at the very early stage of this, this is China, in, like, February of 2020. And I said, honey, I love you, but that's crazy. And then he showed me so much primary documentation that I'm now a 1000% persuaded. He explained to me how unrestricted warfare works, which is the Chinese, you know, ancient methodology of going to war, not like Westerners experience war. It's not bombs dropping or armies invading, it's buying up our ports, buying up our water supplies, buying up our farmland, buying up our president, buying up our agencies, you know, influencing our universities, creating, as doctor Malone pointed out, division, confusion, funding propaganda, right, demoralizing us.
So why would they not make war on the other superpower they want to get rid of via, you know, appropriating the pharmaceutical system. It's genius. It you know, it's absolute genius, and that's what's happening. War is being waged on us by China and their allies, the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization. And as Brian, my husband put it, they want our land, they want our water, they want our energy supplies, they want our grid, they want our natural resources, they want our farmland, they don't want our population.
And combine this, again I'm a daughter and granddaughter of immigrants, I believe in it legal immigration, but combine this with a thoroughly open border where millions of people are flowing in who don't know what democracy is from the countries that many of them come from. And as Ed Dowd said, just wait 5 years. And those of us who remember what the constitution is, many will be sick or dead, and there's a new a new, reality in which America can be a thing of the past as a beacon of liberty because no one will remember what the constitution is anymore. It'll be a thoroughly altered landscape. So and the other last piece of evidence I have that this is war and that this injection is a bioweapon has to do with the distribution of adverse events.
So there are 30 there are 42,000 plus adverse events as I mentioned in the Pfizer documents. That's just 3 months. 36,000 of them are in North America, especially the United States. 7000 of them are from Western Europe in order of political importance, so Britain, Germany, France, Greece, Italy, Spain. And all the rest of the adverse events combined come from the rest of the 132 countries where this was rolled out.
So that's not random distribution, and it's very easy to make this injection more or less lethal by doing simple things such as changing the brand with Moderna more than 3 times more lethal than Pfizer, because Moderna has a 100 micrograms of the key ingredients and Pfizer has 30 for an adult dose, or or things like playing with temperature. And so this is very terrifying to me, and it's it's also a signal to me that this is a bioweapon. And I guess what I would just say is history and now I'll move to the happy part because this is very crucially awful and unbearable. I guess I'll just say, like, history is so, deceptive in a way because people, if they've never seen something happen before in their lifetime, they think it has never happened. Right?
So we've never seen another superpower poison a superpower through pharmaceuticals, but that doesn't mean that bioweapons haven't been part of human history for as long as there's been records of war, whether it's throwing diseased corpses of animals by catapult into the walls of walled cities in biblical times or in the middle ages to, you know, smallpox in blankets recorded in the 18th century in journals on in North America. So this is happening and I guess we need to wake up. Alright. Now I'm gonna this is so horrible. Are you still with me for the kind of hopeful part?
Alright. Thank you. Thank you. So, like this is my life and Amy Kelly's life and the volunteers lives, like, just when you think it can't be more grotesque and horrific, you find another one of these things. And this is very existentially traumatizing, right?
And we're not done yet, they're not done yet, there's more. So these these people are literally standing at the gates, you know, I I think of, is it Saint Michael with the dragon and the sword? You know, they're literally standing at the gates of of where humanity lives and facing this dragon every single day. And, you know, I do my small part, kind of standing by to transcribe their battles with the dragon. It's very painful and you have to and I don't know about you guys but I ask and I don't know if Amy asked because she seems superhuman but I ask like, why are we going through this?
How do how can this be? How can like, how can we have been forsaken like this? You know, how could what's happening? Right? None of it makes sense.
Well, I study history very carefully, and I study the history of totalitarianism very carefully. I wrote a book in 2,008 predicting all of this called the end of America, not this part of this, but predicting the fact that America could lose its democracy very easily because of how other fragile democracies have collapsed in the past. And what struck me, what I couldn't figure out, was why what was happening around the world from 2020 on was not like any human history I've ever seen or learned about in any book at any time in my lifetime, nothing ever. Here's what I mean, it was all in lockstep. Every leader said exactly the same things, in exactly the same way, at exactly the same time they rolled out the stupid policies in exactly the same sequence and there was no normal human history, there's infighting, there's treachery, there are factions, people make mistakes, peep you know, there are rich people who just for whatever reason don't go along with things because they don't need the money you're bribing them with or whatever.
None of that was happening. And bringing us back to the beginning of my talk I've also never seen whole groups of people in a state of delusion that's fixed. And doctor Malone mentioned this a little bit, and there's been a lot of work done on how people go into hysteria basically, historically, but I I'd never seen anything like this. And so I came reluctantly to the conclusion that we're not in human history anymore, That we've entered kind of, and I agree with what the Shannon Joyce term, we've entered kind of a biblical time in which history is not behaving normally and I believe that we I like I'm a deep rationalist, classically trained, believe in the enlightenment, critical tradition, so we don't usually talk about God and metaphysical forces in my old world certainly, but I think we have to talk about God and metaphysical forces now or we will not survive. So I've come to believe that a I've come to believe that a a an evil force that is bigger and more impressive and more gargantuan and scary than anything we could ever imagine, I think bigger than Satan, but that's another conversation because like Satan's in opposition to God, but this is like, I don't even care about God.
I don't care about humanity. It's this dark, dark, dark intelligence that was suddenly unleashed on the whole world. I think that's here, I don't fully know what it is, I've written an essay called Have the Ancient Gods Returned because it kind of reminds me more of you know, Amalek or or, Baal, you know, and, Doctor. Rabbi Jonathan Khan or Minister Jonathan Khan writes about this as well. But, like, whoever they are, their dark forces we haven't seen in our lifetime.
Right? Maybe we had a glimpse of them with Nazism, but they're creepy and occult and metaphysical and they love death and they want death and they're turning they're turning all of our institutions into a mirror of what they used to be. Hospitals used to support life, now they're engineering death. You know, euthanasia used to be not a thing, now it's a program in Canada with, you know, ads aimed at depressed teenagers. You know, even pro choice people like me, reluctantly, 1st trimester, I am, another conversation, would never in the past have been on board with bills that are are real that I've seen that have passed in Maryland and Washington state that make it basically fine to neglect a newborn baby for a month to death to death.
Right? So like all of our Judeo Christian values, even if we don't believe in a Judeo Christian God, our west till 2020 still had the imprint of Judeo Christian values in our institutions. If you go to court, you don't expect the person to win who bribes the judge. You know, you expect impartial justice. In the orphanage, they're not trafficking the kids.
They're trying to find homes for them. Right? Those are Judeo Christian values that that shaped our institutions even though we thought our institutions were secular. Well, it feels like, to me it feels like God has kind of said, you want to do it yourself this is what it looks like. And just stepped back and allowed this in rushing of not as punishment, but as some kind of balancing or cleansing or test or shaking us out of our complacency, allowed this to happen.
So where I'm going with that, I was very struck in my struggle with this time and these questions with a quote from the late doc, doctor Zelenko, who was an Orthodox Jew, and he and he said that that we're humanity is going through a time that is a test for humanity. And that makes sense to me. I don't think it's a punishment like we've been bad, though we have clearly been bad. I think it's some kind of karma. I think it's I think it's a mirror being held up to us.
You know, you you didn't cherish life. This is what it looks like when you don't cherish life. Your kids die. You know, you didn't prioritize your family. This is what it looks like when you let your family go.
You're all isolated in rooms and have lost the ability to be close to each other. You know, you didn't talk to me. You didn't worship me. Well, I I, you know, I let people close the churches and synagogues. Let's see who speaks up against it.
Nobody except for, like, 2 ministers, probably you guys and, like, one orthodox Jew, like, you know, like like, everyone walked away from god in the last few years. No one, almost no one said, we're not closing our church. We're not closing our synagogue, and the people who did got arrested are fined. I spoke at one of their churches in California, but was there did God's people say no? You know, my I can't I can't enter the synagogue that my mother belongs to because I'm not vaccinated to this day to to say yard site for my deceased father.
I can't walk in the door. K? Is this God's, like, direction in any of these religions? No. So it is a test.
It's a time of testing, and and and it's a time of deconstruction and reconstruction. So I'll just end by saying we're we're witnessing our institutions collapsing or they've already collapsed. Right? The media, the churches, the synagogues, the universities, you know, they're all corrupt, corrupt government, corrupt, corrupt all the way down, hospitals, the medical system. So we're either gonna revert to barbarism or or we're going to do what you all are doing here and say, okay, it's just us now, let's start anew.
Let's start a new clinic. Let's start a new school system even if it's just for neighbors homeschooling, you know, or shaming their their local school board. Let's start a new fellowship, let's worship wherever we worship, maybe labels don't matter so much anymore, let's just find godly people and work with them and fellowship with them. And let's reclaim our constitution. Let's let's let's defend and protect our constitution, whoever we are, wherever we come from.
That's our job. So that's where we are. And when I hear you and and listen to this and feel this, I feel that there is hope, but that we need, you know, we need to be those embers of hope in the darkness that's going to light a whole new set of lamps and candles and fires and and be part of building a new civilization, which is better and cleaner and kinder and more compassionate and really more aligned with with God's grace than what we've allowed to happen. So I will end with 2 Chronicles 714, which is a quote I think about a lot because I cling to it when I'm praying for all my loved ones who have received this horrific injection. If my people which are called by my name shall humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Thank you so much.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Access The Summit For Truth coverage here: And thanks to @ShannonJoyRadio! https://rumble.com/v3qqfqj-live-the-summit-for-truth-and-wellness.html
LIVE! The Summit For Truth & Wellness With Dr. Naomi Wolf, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Ryan Cole, Jeffrey Tucker & Bobbie Anne Cox!
This special event is produced by Joy Media to benefit Americans For Healthcare Alternatives! ALL proceeds today will be gifted to AFHA a ministry devoted to building brick and mortar wellness centers
rumble.com
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
🚨 Watch: Freedom To Chains: In The End, We Will Get Exactly What We Deserve - Paul Harvey (Bookmark this if you’re short on time. It’s worth a listen.) https://t.co/cogEbKomOc
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the dangers of excessive government control and the importance of personal responsibility. They highlight the decline of past civilizations due to moral decay and excessive taxation. The speaker emphasizes the need to uphold the American creed of faith in God, country, and self, along with the importance of hard work and self-reliance. They urge for a return to these values to ensure a prosperous future and avoid the fate of past empires.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At Runnymede, the Magna Carta was handed to King John on the end of a sword denying to royalty the right of unlimited taxation. Yet, you know, it was for us, the American people, to become the first in recorded history ever voluntarily to surrender our rights to private property. Yes. We did. With an innocent sounding constitutional amendment, 16th, which says that congress will have the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes from whatever source derived.
And we forgot to put any limit on the extent to which we could tax ourselves. Conceivably, we could be taxed out of all private property. We could be taxed not 70%, 80%, 90%, but a 100%. We could awaken one morning and find that the government owns the farm and the house and the car and has a mortgage on the church legally. Historically, whenever any nation has taxed its people more than 25% of their national income, initiative was destroyed and that nation was headed for economic eclipse.
History says we'll roll forward on momentum for a little while, but we'd better get some more gas in the tank pretty quick. You see, ours is not the first by George Good government to arise on the world stage. There have been several. Rome, Spain, and Greece, and China, and each enjoyed about a 150 years at its zenith. That's just about our time in the New World.
And then each decayed away. Not one of them was ever destroyed by anybody else's marching legions. Each rotted away morally, socially, culturally, economically, simultaneously. You know, one of the most cruel paradoxes of history is this. Because each was a good government, it bore bountiful fruit.
When it bore bountiful fruit, the people got fat. And when they got fat, they got lazy. When they got lazy, they began to want to absolve themselves of personal responsibility and turn over to government to do for them things which traditionally they had been doing for themselves. At first, there appears to be nothing wrong asking government to perform some extra service for you but if you ask government for extra services, government in order to perform its increasing function has to get bigger. Right?
And as government gets bigger, in order to support its increasing size, it has to what? Tax the individual more so the individual gets littler. And to collect the increased taxes requires more tax collectors. So the government gets bigger in order to pay the additional tax collectors. It has to tax the individual more.
So the government gets bigger and the individual gets littler. And the government gets bigger and the individual gets littler until the government is all powerful. The individual is hardly anything at all. The government is all powerful. The people are cattle.
Some believe that the need is for a vigorous strong man to arise on the scene, to regulate and regiment the affairs of men. Yet history tells us there have been several such. Once upon a time, there was a nation great and powerful and good. She was suffering from the aftermath of war from a depression. And then came upon the scene a leader, an idealist, self confident, intolerant of criticism.
Wisely, he limited his early activities to combating the financial depression. Nobody could argue with that. But in a while, he began to regulate business and establish new rules to govern commerce and finance. Some of them in diametrical disagreement with the God made laws of supply and demand, but anybody who disagreed with those new rules was promptly fired. The national debt mounted alarmingly.
Whenever anybody tried to tell him that governments, even as people can go broke when they spend beyond their incomes, he said they just didn't understand deficit finance. What do you say? Did he build on rock or on sand? I say on sand. I am satisfied with all my heart.
That if uncle Sam ever does get whipped, here too, it will have been an inside job. It was internal decay. It was not external attack that destroyed the Roman Empire. Starting about a 146 BC, internal conditions in Rome were characterized by a welter of class wars and conflicts, street brawls, corrupt governors, lack of personal integrity, and moral responsibility. And Rome passed into what history has recorded as the dark ages lasting a 1000 years.
Just by turning to the left, the world has gone in circles. Now either we will profit from the errors of their ways, Or it follows as the night the day, our children are gonna have to relive the dark ages all over again. How come after 1000 of years of experiment, our new nation has come so far so fast. All this in less than 200 years. What is the secret of our success?
Well, I think it had to do with a basic American's creed. Perhaps it never passed the pioneer's lips in this form. But if it had, I think he would have said something like this. I believe in my God, in my country, and in myself. I know that sounds like a trite, too simple thing to say, and yet it's a rare man today who will dare to stand up and say, I believe in my God and my country and in myself and in that order.
Well, sir, when that early pioneer turned his eyes toward the west, he didn't demand that somebody else look after him. He didn't demand a free education. He didn't demand a guaranteed rocking chair at Eventide. He didn't demand that somebody else take care of him if he got ill or got old. There was an old fashioned philosophy in those days that a man was supposed to provide for his own and for his own future.
He didn't demand a maximum amount of money for a minimum amount of work, nor did he expect pay for no work at all. Come to think of it, he didn't demand anything. That hard handed pioneer just looked out there at the rolling plains, stretching away to the tall green mountains and then lifted his eyes to the blue skies and said, thank you, god. Now I can take it from here. Well, that spirit isn't dead in our country.
It's dormant. It's been discredited in some circles, driven underground, but it isn't dead. It's just that a few seasons ago, politicians baiting their hooks with free barbecue and trading a Ponzi promise for votes began telling us, we don't want opportunity anymore. We want security. We don't want opportunity, they said.
We want security. They said it so often we came to believe them. We wanted security. And they gave us chains, and we were secure. Suddenly with our constitutional guarantees depleted, with our national character eroding away with our tax laws penalizing those who dare to prosper, With workers concentrating on how little they can get by with instead of how much they can produce.
Suddenly, we looked overhead one day to discover that the first tin moon in space was a Russian accomplishment. That free men dragging their feet had been out distanced by slave workers dragging their chains, and we were sore afraid. Perhaps this was a disguised blessing too. Maybe a dramatic accomplishment by this cold war adversary was necessary to get us off our dead centers and back to work again. If we can revive in ourselves, then in our youth, something of that basic American's creed, the horizon has never ever been so limitless.
For man stands now on the threshold of his highest adventure of all, his first altering footsteps into space. 20 years from today, half of the products you will be using in your everyday living aren't even in the dictionary yet. We've got it made if we just keep on keeping on. We've got it made. And if we don't, we will follow those other great nation states of history into the graveyard of ignominious oblivion.
History promises only this for certain. We will get exactly what we deserve.
reSee.it AI Summary
Speaking out against censorship and propaganda is crucial to combatting the influence of a totalitarian system. Even a small positive impact on an individual can have a ripple effect on the entire system. It's important to question everything and not be afraid to speak out sincerely and honestly, as we all have the capacity to change the world through our words. Look at Brazil as an example.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
🚨 Watch: Combatting The Largest & Most Sophisticated Censorship & Propaganda Machine Ever: What Can People Do? @DesmetMattias, “If you have a minor positive impact in society on one individual, you will have an impact on the entire system.” Someone that speaks out on @X, at the kitchen table, in a shop, somewhere on the street, in a sincere & honest way, will have an impact on the entire system. It’s time to start speaking out. Because otherwise, we will go to a state in which nobody can stop the [totalitarian] system anymore. Look at Brazil. People should realize we all have the capacity in ourselves to change the world through sincere speech. In a world filled with censorship & propaganda, you have to question everything and not be afraid to speak out.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We must practice sincere and honest speech, as even small positive impacts on individuals can influence society as a whole. Speaking sincerely at a kitchen table or in public can create ripples of change. We all have the power to shape the world through truthful words. It is our ethical duty to speak honestly and responsibly, as the truth holds more power than any propaganda. We must not claim to possess the truth, but rather recognize it outside ourselves and have the courage to share it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People have to practice the art of good speech. They have to continue to speak out. They have to continue to speak out in a sincere and honest way, respectfully, not trying to convince the other, just articulating their own most honest and sincere opinion about things, that's the first and most important thing. And they should realize that it doesn't matter where you speak out, I'm speaking out here now in an interview, I did it at Tucker Carlson's for 1,000,000 and 1,000,000 of Americans, but that's not what is the most important thing. Sincere words spoken at a kitchen table to 1 person can and will have an impact on the entire system of society.
That's exactly what complex dynamical systems theory showed us. All complex dynamical systems and also the psychological processes in society are the complex dynamical systems. All complex dynamical systems have this wonderful characteristic, this wonderful quality, which is referred to as sensitivity to initial conditions in complex dynamical systems, which boils down to the following that a minor change in a small detail of the system, like for instance, a minor change in the vibration of 1 water molecule in a pot of boiling water in the convection will have an impact on the entire architecture of the convection patterns in the pot of water. So in exactly the same way, if you have a minor positive impact in society, on one individual, you will this, will have an impact on the entire system. So someone who speaks out at the kitchen table, in a shop, somewhere on the street, in a sincere and honest way, will have an impact on the on and on the entire system.
We all have the capacity in ourselves to change the world through sincere speech. That's the most important thing. As soon as we realize that, you should realize that we have this enormous responsibility, each and every one of us, to try to live up to that first and foremost ethical duty of the human being to articulate the words that seem sincere and honest and if we do that, we will, no matter how few of us there are, but we will just prove more powerful than even the most sophisticated and the most, the largest propaganda machinery in history, in human history. The truth in the end will prove more powerful. We shouldn't be naive, when talking and thinking about the truth, we should never think that we are the only ones who possess the truth, we should never think that we possess the truth, because if you think that you possess the truth, you already lost it.
Truth is something that is always outside of ourselves, with which we can sometimes resonate a little bit, feel it a little bit, and it is at that moment that we have to have the courage to articulate it and that's what will make the difference.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Biden administration has set a world record for the number of illegal immigrants entering the country. The graph shows alarming numbers of single adults, families, and minors crossing the border from over 160 countries. The open-border policies of the Biden administration and Democrats are facilitating the largest invasion in US history. For more coverage on this report and border-related news, click the link provided. Consider following this page and subscribing to @EpochTimes for more important topic coverage.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
🚨 New: Biden Admin Sets World Record For Illegals Entering The Country: This graph should be alarming to anyone who prioritizes the safety and security of The United States and its citizens. • 🟧 Orange indicates single adults. • 🟦 Blue indicates families. • 🟥 Red indicates minors. Illegals from over 160 countries have crossed into the US to date. How many are unaccounted for? The Biden admin and Democrat open-border policies are facilitating the largest invasion in the country’s history. For more coverage on this report and border related news, check out the link below this post.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Consider following this page and subscribing to @EpochTimes using the link attached for more coverage on important topics like this. 🇺🇸 https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/illegal-immigrants-begin-squatting-in-us-homes-5620519?utm_source=copyreflink&utm_campaign=BlakeHabyan&src_src=copyreflink&src_cmp=BlakeHabyan
Illegal Immigrants Begin Squatting in US Homes
Word appears to have gotten out among illegal immigrants that many U.S. states allow them to seize the homes of Americans using squatters rights laws.
theepochtimes.com
reSee.it AI Summary
The US has seen people from over 160 countries enter the country illegally this fiscal year alone, according to Border Patrol Chief Jason Owens. Recent events, such as a viral TikTok video encouraging illegal immigration and legal rulings granting rights to illegal immigrants, have raised concerns about national security. Once these individuals enter the US, there are no barriers preventing them from going anywhere in the country.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
NEW: People From 160 Countries Or More Have Entered The US Illegally This Fiscal Year Alone Wow. Border Patrol Chief Jason Owens reports that so far this fiscal year alone, the US has had people from 160 countries or more come across the border illegally. This news comes after the following recent border related events: • A TikTokker went viral telling illegal immigrants how to ‘invade’ American homes and invoke squatter’s rights. • An Obama appointed federal judge ruled that illegal immigrants have a right to carry guns. • A federal judge upheld a Washington, D.C. law allowing noncitizens, including illegals, to vote in municipal elections. Once these unvetted illegals enter into the US, there is essentially nothing stopping them from ending up anywhere in the country. In other words, this is an obvious national security threat.
Video Transcript AI Summary
People from 160+ countries are illegally crossing our borders using smuggling routes, creating a global issue. Smugglers worldwide help them travel through continents like Europe, Asia, South America, and Central America to reach various points along our borders.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So far this fiscal year alone, we've had people from a 160 countries or more come across our border illegally. This is a global issue. We have people literally from all points across the globe making that same journey, and they're using smuggling routes. Every country and every region has smugglers that try and facilitate a pipeline for them to get to where they're going and they're connected with one another. So they may if they're coming from Europe or they're coming from Asia, they'll find ways to get to maybe South America and then from South America and then they may may make their way up through the Darien and and make their way up through Central America and ultimately find their way to decision points that take them to different points along our borders depending on what smuggling organization that they're using.
reSee.it AI Summary
Joe Rogan expresses concern over the handling of the Maui fires, suggesting it is being done in a way that may indicate a land grab. He highlights the significant cost of rebuilding the destroyed houses, emphasizing that it is a small amount compared to what is being spent in Ukraine. Hawaii Gov. Josh Green has previously linked the wildfire to global warming.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
New: Land Grab? Joe Rogan Talks Maui Fires: What’s Going On In Hawaii? It seems many have forgotten about Maui. “The way it’s being handled is not like you’re handling victims of a natural disaster that’s horrific and took more lives than any other wildfire in the history of this country.”, @joerogan says. “You’re doing it like you’re trying to figure out a way to take that from those people.” It would take approximately $5 billion to rebuild all the houses that were destroyed. “That’s a drop in the bucket to what they’re spending in Ukraine.” Hawaii Gov. Josh Green linked the deadly wildfire to global warming in August, 2023.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a conspiracy surrounding the lack of rebuilding after fires, with people unable to have insurance inspectors assess the damage. There are concerns about foreclosure, banks taking over properties, and developers benefiting at the expense of affected individuals. The handling of the situation is criticized for not prioritizing support for victims. Despite a federal emergency declaration, affected individuals only received a one-time payment of $700.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's the real conspiracy about the fires. Like, they haven't done any rebuilding. Those people, they weren't allowed to have insurance inspectors go in there. I don't know if they can now, that people still had to pay their mortgage on those things. Oh, jeez.
And the thing is just like, if you're getting to this point where you don't have anything and you're you you can't rebuild your house and you're fucked, and then they come along and offer you a payment or something, or you get foreclosed on because you haven't paid your mortgage. Mhmm. And then the banks own it. And then whoever the fuck is the developer owns it. And then whatever they wanna do for the better good of Maui, they build there.
And then these people lose everything. This is what's really scary about it. It's because, like, the way it's being handled, it's not like you're handling victims of a natural disaster that's horrific and took more lives than any wildfire in the history of this country. You're doing it like you are trying to figure out a way to take that from those people. You're not doing it like you're trying to support those people and and build it back.
You're you're doing it like if you know what's really going on. You're not asking for financial aid for these people to deal with their mortgages, and you're not asking for aid from the government in one of those giant Ukraine bills. It would take $5,000,000,000. Right? Wasn't that what the money was?
5,000,000,000 to rebuild all those houses? That that's a drop in the bucket to what they're spending Yeah. In Ukraine. Yeah. And there's no consideration at all to do something for these fucking people?
That seems like you don't want to do anything. They they declared an emergency. I know when it happened, like, a, a federal like, that usually means they can activate all federal funds and Well, those people got a onetime payment of $700.
reSee.it AI Summary
Controlling information at the education level discourages critical thought and makes people easier to control. It is a form of mind control implemented from a young age, leading to blind trust in narratives. Dissenting voices are dismissed as conspiracy theorists. The COVID response highlighted the need to question everything in a world flooded with propaganda and false flags. Dumbing down kids keeps society dull and compliant while rights are gradually removed.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Watch: Rare 1946 Film Tells The Power Of Controlling Information At The Education Level: Discouraging critical thought and questioning narratives has been practiced for many years by design. It makes people easier to control. Information control is a form of mind control. That’s why it’s implemented at a young age. These concepts lead people to blindly trust what they are told, starting with the indoctrination of youth and lasting throughout adulthood. Dissenting voices are then more likely to be dismissed (E.g. conspiracy theorist = crazy person). How many times have you seen someone say “That’s dumb, there’s no way.”, and that thing turned out to be true? This became increasingly apparent after the COVID response. It's about dumbing down kids to keep society dull and asleep while rights are gradually removed, not only with no resistance, but with compliance. In today’s world that’s flooded with propaganda, military-grade psychological operations, and false flags, it’s important to question everything.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Teachers are trained to discourage independent thinking in students, promoting blind acceptance of information. Questioning is discouraged, with textbooks and authority figures seen as the ultimate truth. Control over media ensures that people only receive information approved by those in power, whether through government censorship or private interests.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: See how community trains its teachers.
Speaker 1: Bear this in mind. Young people cannot be trusted to form their own opinion. This business about open mindedness is nonsense. It's a waste of time trying to teach students who think for themselves. It's our job to tell them.
Speaker 0: And when teachers put such training into practice, despotism stands a good chance. These children are being taught to accept uncritically whatever they are told. Questions are not encouraged.
Speaker 2: How can you ask such a question? Have you got a textbook? Yes, ma'am. Does it say here that our law courts are always just? Yes, ma'am.
Then how dare you question a fact? -ed out.
Speaker 0: And so we aren't surprised when
Speaker 2: But it must be true. I saw it in this book right here.
Speaker 0: And if books and newspapers and the radio are efficiently controlled, the people will read and accept exactly what the few in control want them to. Government censorship is one form of control. A newspaper which breaks a government censorship rule can be suspended. It is also possible for newspapers and other forms of communication to be controlled by private interests.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a video from 2019, Biden can be seen calling for people to 'surge the border'. This raises questions about the current state of illegal immigration and the perceived lack of border control. The number of illegal immigrants crossing into the US is expected to keep rising, leading some to believe there is an intentional effort to maintain open borders.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Watch: Remember When? Biden Called For Illegal Immigrants To ‘Surge The Border’: This is the guy they told you received 80,000,000+ votes from Americans. In 2019 that same guy called for people to ‘surge the border’. Fast forward to 2024 and look at the current state of things. The rate of illegal immigrants crossing into the US is only expected to continue increasing. There is a deliberate effort to maintain no borders. Wild.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe we should quickly send help to the border for those seeking asylum. It's important to listen to their stories and offer refuge to those fleeing oppression. This is a core value of our nation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would, in fact, make sure that there is we immediately surge to the border. All those people are seeking asylum. They deserve to be heard. That's who we are. We're a nation that says if you wanna flee and you're fleeing oppression, you should come.
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: Obama highlighted the strategy of flooding the public square with misinformation to weaken democratic institutions and create mass confusion. He legalized media deception and propaganda in America.
Post 2: Follow this account for alternative information not covered by corporate media.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Must Watch: Remember When? Obama Summed Up How To Ruin America In Under 1 Minute: Obama: "Understand, it's not necessary for people to believe this information in order to weaken democratic institutions. You just have to flood a country’s public square with enough raw sewage. You just have to raise enough questions, spread enough dirt, plant enough conspiracy theorizing, that citizens no longer know what to believe. Once they lose trust in their leaders, in mainstream media, in political institutions, in each other, in the possibility of truth, the game is won." Remember… This is coming from the guy who legalized the use of media deception and propaganda in America. They aim to create mass confusion so people don't know what is true.
Video Transcript AI Summary
To weaken democratic institutions, flooding the public square with misinformation is enough. By spreading doubt and conspiracy theories, trust in leaders, media, and each other is eroded, leaving citizens unsure of what to believe. This ultimately leads to a breakdown in society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And it's not necessary for people to believe this information in order to weaken democratic institutions. You just have to flood a country's public square with enough raw sewage. You just have to raise enough questions, spread enough dirt, plant enough conspiracy theorizing that citizens no longer know what to believe. Once they lose trust in their leaders, in mainstream media, in political institutions, in each other, in the possibility of truth, the game's won.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Consider giving this account a follow for information you won’t get from the corporate media.
reSee.it AI Summary
The invasion of the US continues as over 2.5 million people have crossed the border in 2023. Customs and Border Patrol is accused of aiding and abetting this invasion by lifting the barbed wire for a group of around 300 migrants to cross in Eagle Pass, TX. The efficiency for illegal crossings is expected to increase in 2024.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
New: Coordinated Invasion Of The US Continues: Biden Admin Deploys Heavy Equipment To Lift Razor Wire For Wave Of Illegals: The invasion of the US continues at record levels. As of today, over 2.5 MILLION have crossed the border in 2023. What is even more concerning, is that Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) is aiding and abetting the invasion of the US. They are being commanded to work against the Constitution. The group 'coincidentally' arrived in the area and stormed the river bank at Eagle Pass, TX. “This huge caravan of around 300 migrants crossed into Eagle Pass thanks to Border Patrol lifting the barbed wire. Hundreds of migrants crossed in a few minutes," Border Hawk correspondent Efraín González reports. "Somehow, these large groups of migrants are informed about the place and time when the forklifts raise the barbed wire to cross in groups." The efficiency for illegals to cross the border is only expected to grow into 2024. Video: @BorderHawkNews
Video Transcript AI Summary
A large group of about 300 migrants managed to cross into Eagle Pass with the help of border patrol agents who removed the barbed wire. This is the fourth major crossing witnessed by our cameras in late October. Previously, these caravans were directed to unpopulated areas of the Rio Grande, where border patrol used forklift tractors to apprehend them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This huge caravan of around 300 migrants crossed into Eagle Pass, thanks to border patrol agents lifting the barbed wire. The hundreds of migrants crossed it in a few minutes. This being the 4 massive crossing that our cameras witnessed in the last days of October. Previously, these caravans are sent to uninhabited areas of the Rio Grande, where border patrol acquires them with forklift tractors.
reSee.it AI Summary
Bill Gates expressed his interest in population control to Klaus Schwab in 2008. He mentioned the potential reduction in population growth through disease control. This is ironic considering the World Economic Forum's focus on "Rebuilding Trust" at their meeting in Davos, Switzerland. The question arises: why does Gates feel entitled to manage the world population?
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Must Watch: Did You Know? In 2008, Bill Gates Told Klaus Schwab He Wanted To Spend The Next 15 Years Focusing On Population Control: With ‘Disease X’ coverage picking up traction, I felt this would be worth sharing. And of course there will be a shot for any manufactured ‘pandemic’. “…And a number of the other ones [diseases], we have things in the pipeline.” “Which then has this effect of reducing population growth. That’s the big benefit.”, Gates says. What’s ironic, is that the WEF’s meeting in Davos, Switzerland this week is focused around “Rebuilding Trust”. What makes him feel entitled to manage the world population?
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses their ambitious goals for the next 10 to 15 years in tackling various diseases. They believe that over half of the 20 diseases targeted by their global program can see a significant impact within this timeframe. While some diseases like AIDS may not see a dramatic improvement, others like malaria have potential solutions in the pipeline. The speaker emphasizes the importance of reducing mortality rates in developing countries, as it positively affects population growth, education, and nutrition. They use dashboards internally to track progress and share results transparently. The speaker also mentions the value of learning from any shortcomings and lessons that can be applied to other foundations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 10, 15 years. Of the new work? Of the new work. Yeah. It's your new function.
Well, I've set very ambitious goals because I'm quite optimistic. If you look at say the 20 diseases, that our global whole program goes after. I don't fit within 15 years, over half of those, we could have had a very dramatic impact. Some of them will prove to be harder than others. For example, AIDS, we will made an improvement but not the dramatic improvement probably in that time frame.
Malaria perhaps and a number of the other ones, we have things in the pipeline. So, you know, huge change in the, mortality rates in developing countries which then has this effect of reducing population growth. That's the this big benefit That then makes everything like education and nutrition a lot easier. So I have very high expectations there. I mean, I actually use these dashboards Internally at the foundation to make everything be quite numeric.
You know, we're trying to be rigorous about that and even share those so that people can see, Oh, you fell short of, what you had in mind and then we get to explain if we have any lessons that might, be learnable from other foundations.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Covid-19 pandemic has been used as a financial mechanism, benefiting billionaires and consolidating power. It has also accelerated the largest transfer of wealth in history. The global debt crisis is being disguised by blaming a "deadly virus". The pandemic has also paved the way for digital IDs, Central Bank Digital Currency, Universal Basic Income, and increased surveillance. A new biomedical health management system has been created, focusing on mRNA vaccines. Fear has been used to condition the population for states of emergency and prepare for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Why Again? Hidden in Plain Sight: Covid/Psyop-19 Operation’s Objectives: 1. Creation of “The Pandemic” as a financial mechanism. Manufactured pandemics have become mammoth investment opportunities that increase the wealth of billionaires and consolidate power 2. Acceleration of the largest transfer of wealth in human history 3. Disguising the reasons for the global debt crisis (Points finger at a “deadly virus”) 4. Expansion of and setting the stage for digital IDs, Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), Universal Basic Income (UBI), and allowing for the tracking of purchases; nudging people towards ‘desired’ behaviors, or the ability to ‘shut off’ undesirables (Social Credit Score) 5. Justification and implementation of the Bio-Security State, including AI surveillance across multiple sectors of society 6. Creation of an entirely new and lucrative Bio-Medical ‘health management’ system in order to introduce and codify an entirely new Bio-Tech medical model for the Pharmaceutical Industry with a focus on mRNA ‘vaccines’ 7. Casting fear; conditioning the population for “States of Emergency”, and preparing for the implementation of “The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/covid-mask-guidelines-eris-variant-b2395530.html https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12410235/Gloomy-scientists-call-people-start-wearing-Covid-masks-sound-alarm-new-variant-BA-6-lot-new-mutations.html https://nypost.com/2023/08/18/as-covid-cases-rise-who-should-be-wearing-masks/
Should we wear masks again? Covid guidelines experts recommend
Should we wear masks again?
independent.co.uk
Scientists call for people to start masking up again over Covid strain
The new sub-strain - which doesn't have an official name but has been dubbed BA.6 - has only been spotted in two countries so far, Denmark and Israel.
dailymail.co.uk
Amid ‘summer surge’ of new COVID variant — should we be wearing masks?
To mask, or not to mask? That is the question facing many doctors and public health officials worldwide, as cases of COVID-19 once again tick upward.
nypost.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Călin Georgescu, former United Nations Executive Director and Club of Rome representative, explains how the UN, WEF, and Davos have become indistinguishable, serving the interests of oligarchs rather than the citizens they are meant to represent. Georgescu's expertise in sustainable development lends credibility to his observations. Watch the clip to form your own opinion.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Watch: Călin Georgescu Explains Infiltrating Governments (Former United Nations Executive Director And Former Club Of Rome Representative): Georgescu confirms The UN, WEF, and Davos have become indistinguishable. “They are not the employee of their people [citizens]. They are employees of the oligarchs.” Does this sound like something you’re witnessing today? Watch the entire clip for yourself. Background: Călin Georgescu is a Romanian senior expert in sustainable development, with an acknowledged recognition in the field, following 17 years of service in the environmental area in the United Nations system. He was appointed the executive director of the United Nations Global Sustainable Index Institute in Geneva and Vaduz for the period 2015 – 2016. Prior to that, he served as President of the European Research Centre for the Club of Rome (2013 – 2015). He is also member of the Club of Rome International in Switzerland.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how the world is controlled by a system where leaders like the Bundescanceler or president work for the oligarchs rather than the people. They argue that the United Nations (UN) is indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum (WEF) because they are controlled by the same ideas and oligarchs. The WEF creates leaders through their young global leaders program, ensuring they are politically correct. However, they also need intelligent opposition. The speaker suggests that the UN controls people by offering high salaries, free access to various amenities, and a UN badge, but this does not make them more important than ordinary people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The world with regards to system, they have the power on Europe because they control all the people like Bundescanceler or president or prime minister or whatever there are. Mhmm. Because they they are not the employee of their people.
Speaker 1: They work for the other side. Exactly. They work for the oligarchs.
Speaker 0: They are they are the employees of the oligarchs.
Speaker 1: Is it so in effect, what you're saying is that the UN is now indistinguishable from the World Economic Forum or Davos, in short, because It is being controlled by the same ideas and the same oligarchs.
Speaker 0: Totally. 100%. Mhmm. Totally.
Speaker 1: And the World Economic Forum, in turn, creates their leaders, who are then going to be elected by us through their young global leaders program.
Speaker 0: Here's the point. In general, in United Nations, there are coming people who they checked before, if they are politically correct. But you have to be 100% totally correct totally politically correct.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: If you are not, you cannot be in. However, they need also, how I can say, wise, intelligent, smart people. Mhmm. Because they they need also the opposition, like in Hollywood films.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: You know what I mean? You need also the opposition. Otherwise, it's too dangerous to be just in one side. Mhmm. And they try to control you by salary.
Mhmm. By, Paying you a lot of money. Exactly, by different offers, in a sense that you have access, free access to the transport, free access to the restaurants, free access, different things. And in fact, it's a badge. Your badge of UN badge.
UN badge, doesn't mean that you are some someone important in compared with the people from the street.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
@elonmusk Everyone should see this:
reSee.it AI Summary
John D. Rockefeller's influence on modern medicine involved erasing the mention of natural cures from medical textbooks. Doctors and professors who opposed his plan were marginalized and stripped of their licenses. Rockefeller saw an opportunity to monopolize the oil, chemical, and medical industries, as everything could be patented and sold for high profits. The clip aims to raise awareness about this issue.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Watch: Did You Know? How John D. Rockefeller Founded Modern Medicine And Took Away Natural Cures: “Any mention of the healing powers of herbs, plants, and diet was erased from most medical textbooks.” Doctors and professors who objected the Rockefeller’s plan were crucified by the media, removed from the American Medical Association (AMA), and stripped of their license to teach and practice medicine. Sound familiar? This was a major opportunity for Rockefeller who saw the ability to monopolize the oil, chemical and the medical industries at the same time. The best thing about petrochemicals was that everything could be patented and sold for high profits. Share this clip to spread awareness.
Video Transcript AI Summary
John D. Rockefeller seized control of U.S. Medicine and labeled traditional remedies as alternative when he discovered drugs could be made from petroleum. He bought a German pharmaceutical company and influenced Congress to declare natural healing methods as quackery. Rockefeller took over the American Medical Association and funded medical schools that taught only his approved curriculum. Any mention of herbal healing and diet was removed from textbooks, and dissenting doctors were punished. Rockefeller founded the American Cancer Society to suppress evidence linking petroleum-based medicines to cancer. The pharmaceutical industry, led by Rockefeller, now holds immense power, spending twice as much as Big Oil to influence laws and public perception. This control has made medical errors the third leading cause of death in America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Around the same time that John D. Rockefeller seized U. S. Media, he also hijacked U. S.
Medicine. When it was discovered that drugs could be produced from petroleum, America's top oil mogul ordered his army of propagandists to invert reality accordingly. Medicines used for 1000 of years were suddenly classified as alternative, while the new petroleum based, highly addictive and patentable drugs were declared the gold standard. After buying a German pharmaceutical company that manufactured chemicals of war for Adolf Hitler, Rockefeller leveraged his political influence by pressing Congress to declare natural healing modalities. Unscientific quackery.
Rockefeller then took control of the American Medical Association, and began offering massive grants to top medical schools under the mandate that only his approved curriculum be taught. Any mention of the healing powers of herbs, plants, and diet was erased from most medical text books, doctors and professors who objected to Rockefeller's plan were crucified by the media, removed from the AMA, and stripped of their license to teach and practice medicine, those who dared to speak out were arrested and jailed. When evidence began to emerge that petroleum based medicines were causing cancer, mister Rockefeller founded the American Cancer Society, through which he suppressed that information. John D. Rockefeller is duly credited as the founder of the pharmaceutical industry.
And the reason that medical error is currently the 3rd leading cause of death in America. This is not an indictment against doctors. More than anyone, they are under the stranglehold of the single largest lobbying power in Washington. Every year, the pharmaceutical industry spends at least twice the amount as Big Oil, to influence laws, policies, and public perception. Thanks to mister Rockefeller, the architect of American monopolies, no industry has more power over our lives than Big Pharma.
reSee.it AI Summary
Former hedge fund manager David Webb has created a documentary called "The Great Taking" that exposes the system central bankers have in place to take everything from everyone. This documentary covers what the corporate media avoids discussing and aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the situation. Webb's goal is to allow everyone to see the whole picture and where things are headed for our future. Additionally, a downloadable book version of "The Great Taking" is available for those interested. Consider following this account for alternative information not found in the corporate media.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Must Watch: David Webb - The Great Taking - Exposing The System Central Bankers Have In Place To Take Everything From Everyone: Full Length Documentary: The Everything Bubble. What comes next? This documentary is history in the making. It covers in detail what the corporate media isn't willing to talk about. Much of the chaos you are seeing relates to this subject. David Webb is a former hedge fund manager and Wall Street insider who does an excellent job covering this topic and sticks to what he absolutely knows. His goal is to allow everyone to see irrefutably the whole picture, including the participants who are making it happen. If you're interested in the direction of where things are headed for our future, this is a must watch. A link to the downloadable book version will be included below this post.
Video Transcript AI Summary
David Webb, a former hedge fund manager, discusses his insights into the financial markets and the current state of the global economy. He explains how the creation of money by central banks has outpaced real economic growth, leading to a breakdown in the transmission mechanism of money into the economy. Webb believes that this breakdown in the velocity of money is the underlying reason for many geopolitical issues. He also discusses the need for public banking and the importance of eliminating debt and investing in tangible assets. Webb's book, "The Great Taking," explores these topics in more detail.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is David Webb. I live in Stockholm, Sweden. I'm on a small farm here. It's important to understand I am not giving financial advice. The book I've done has a greater purpose than that.
I am not active in the markets. I'm not short the market. I am in things like farmland. I was managing public equities and ultimately hedge funds through the aftermath Of the Asian financial crisis, the lead up to the .com bubble and bust. And I noticed that fund flows We're very large relative to the size of the US economy, for example, or the global economy.
So I started to look at the Scale of money creation by the Federal Reserve. And I developed the insight that the Fed was actually influencing saying the financial markets, which no one would be surprised at today. But at that time, it was considered conspiracy theory even by my This was something I could not talk to people about, but I began studying it myself. And I saw that in individual weeks, The scale of new money created was on the order of 1% of US GDP or more. Now what that meant, Given that the US economy was growing at maybe 3% or 4% in a good year, to have money creation And on that scale in a single week, it meant that the money creation was far outstripping any real economic growth.
So the transmission mechanism for money creation into real economic activity was breaking down. This is when I started becoming concerned and started following this closely. And it actually developed into a way for me to navigate the markets. So I applied it and I managed to protect people who I was responsible to as my clients through the .com bubble and bust and did very well through that period armed with this understanding. But the bigger understanding was that the Velocity of money was collapsing.
And I knew at that time, this is over 20 years ago, that we were headed into Something like the time that the world experienced through the period of the great wars and the great depression because this kind of velocity of money was occurring at that time. So I went into this deeply and studied everything that was happening leading into the a century saw that this provided the best analogous period for understanding what we were entering then. So I have followed this very closely. I have applied it in my work in what I was doing. So I had an effective understanding of it.
The important thing to understand now is that the velocity of money, which is the relationship between economic growth and money or money creation, Money supply has broken down and is now at a lower level velocity of money than it was at any point during the Great depression and the world wars. So I believe that this is actually the profound underlying reason For the many things we are seeing geopolitically. I grew up in a family of medical people and engineers. They were not involved In high finance. As a boy, I went through basically the beginning of the industrial collapse Of Cleveland.
They say that people strive to get control over what has hurt them. And I grew up with a real need to understand what was destroying us because It deeply affected my family, which had been very happy prior to this. A happy, benevolent family, And it literally destroyed the place where I grew up. So I decided to study business and finance. This was something my My father did not want me to do.
He thought I should be an engineer. And when I was younger, I thought I would have been a medical doctor, but this became the pressing thing for me to understand. So I studied finance and computer science. I got a subscription to The Wall Street Journal. I had no one to guide me.
I just started looking at the Wall Street Journal, and I noticed these tombstones, which announced the big mergers positions, deals, or financing that all these firms were in New York. So I decided at a young age, I needed to go to New York. And I got a job with a computer services firm. I could program. I had studied systems analysis and finance.
So in this 1st year as a young guy, I went into perhaps literally every financial firm in New York City with the Sales teams. So that helps a person, I think, to begin to understand things on an intuitive just by seeing things. It's not so intimidating once you've been into these places. Things are intimidating if you've never encountered them. So that all happened in my 1st year.
And then one of my clients, which was mergers and acquisitions group, There 2 analysts were leaving. 1 was going to Harvard Business School. The other was going to the London office. And the sales Guy that I worked with on that account came back and told me that they needed someone with a background in finance Computers, and I realized at that time that was gonna be me. So I talked with my wife about it.
I showed up at this office so early the next day. Nobody was There, I had to wait about an hour for people to start coming in and they were shocked that I thought that I had any business suggesting that I could work there. They proceeded to put me through a shocking, Stressful morning. I was ushered into one of the senior vice presidents who listened to what I had to say, and And then he said, well, you better be sure you wanna do this because if you fuck up, you're gone. By the time I left, I thought maybe this wasn't such a good idea.
I probably shouldn't have bothered. You know, sure enough, they called back. They needed me because I knew how to do things. So I worked M and A mergers and acquisitions for 5 years in this firm. It was working literally around the clock, Sometimes for days with no sleep or maybe just lying on the office floor for half an hour to get up and continue.
So I learned to deal with a lot of stress with little sleep through this period of time. And then I managed to move to What was then the biggest private equity firm in the world by an order of magnitude. I chose to go there Rather than say, I had another offer from mergers and acquisitions group at L. F. Rothschild that would have been for about twice compensation, but I sense that there was gonna be a crash of some kind.
And a month later It was Black Monday, October of 87, and LF Rothschild was wiped out, lost all of its capital. I really went to this private equity firm because when you're doing M and A, it's basically being a glorified salesman. You're an agent. When you're in the Shoes of the private equity investment firm, you were the principal. It's a different kind of due diligence and analysis.
And I was there for 3 years, but it was very intensive 3 years. And shortly after I had started with the firm, I ended up running the acquisition of this long distance telephone company. I handled all of it Because the partner on the deal had difficulty with stress, and he literally went home and stayed in bed for 6 months. I handled all the due diligence, which was very complicated and the financing. And it ended up being the Largest capital gain in the history of the firm, but it was very stressful for my family because once again, I was working Around the clock, I would get up to negotiations on Saturday morning, late into 3 in the morning, Saturday I sleep for a few hours, start again on Sunday morning.
This went on for 9 months. When it was over, it took a few months, but my wife Eventually said to me, you know, if I knew our life was gonna be like this, I wouldn't have signed up for it. And that just crushed me. I got out a road atlas of the US. We went through it page by page and just thought about where could we go, where could we be happy?
I couldn't stay in that. There was a possibility I would go to their London office, but I knew that would even be more intense. It would just be more of the same. Once I've Done something. I don't need to keep doing it.
I learned what I have to learn from it. I think I am different than other people in this financial world because I actually don't care about the money. That is not why I'm doing it. That should just kind of fall out of what you're doing, and you don't need a lot of it. There's no reason that you need more and more and more.
I was always driven by understanding things, and that actually gave me an advantage. I understood things that other people didn't. So ultimately, we just decided to go back to Cleveland where I grew up, and we bought a house that was within the sound of the church bells where my grandfather's house was. My memory from Sundays when my dad would take us to grandpa's house. So I was really going home to try to make things sane, But the intensity returned.
Again, as I got into managing in the public markets, I had this insight that The public markets were even less efficient than the private markets because you had these big fund flows that were pushing things way up beyond where a negotiated deal would ever be done and driving prices down below where it would be done. You got better opportunities to both buy and sell things. I ended up ultimately running this hedge fund strategy that I Create it. So I designed the trading desk. I trained the people, developed this team trading strategy.
Through the .com bubble and the bus, we were typically in 3 to 400 positions at the same time. I had developed A strategy to be short the market using hundreds of positions so that all these crazy .com stocks, no one Position could kill us. But with all of these positions, we had a kind of visibility into the market and the fund flows And what was happening? We were doing exceptionally well. People couldn't figure out how we were doing so well.
So we had these consultants coming from literally all over the world flying into Cleveland and coming to the Office, the macro thing I was looking at was this rate of money growth. It's always growing, whether it was Accelerating or decelerating. And I knew we had maybe a day or two lead time. Once I saw the figures to get positioned ahead of the market rolling over or the market accelerating upwards, And other people didn't understand this. Even if I explained it to them, they didn't wanna hear about it.
They didn't know how to apply it. It was like that. In addition that I've always operated with a mental model of what is happening in the world. And I suppose I'm different than other people and that the Things I pay attention to is what does not fit my model. That is what can kill you.
So I pay attention to what does not make sense to me. What does not fit? You have to drop everything. Imagine you're in a highly leveraged position with hundreds of positions. When something comes up that does not fit, you pay attention to that immediately.
So the trading room was a newsroom, A research operation, so we paid attention to things 2nd by 2nd, and We would dig into things that did not make sense. So through this period of time, I also started changing, I think, as a person The peak because I was seeing things that were not in the narrative, the news narrative that people were Tempting about what was happening, so I knew that economic data series were being changed. This is after September 11th, as well as all the disconnects around September 11th itself. So it was the beginnings of my Becoming a kind of activist, although I didn't know it, I wrote quarterly letters to my clients. So I assembled things on my desk.
They would accumulate, and I eventually had something like a thick telephone book of just the things that I knew in and it documented that did not conform with the accepted narratives that people were being shown through the media. And I then Thinned this down to a thinner telephone book and literally started going door to door to my neighbors. And what I was doing was I was Seeing how I could get through to people, how could I explain this? And it's damn difficult. Basically, It doesn't work.
I decided that maybe my neighbors were too well off to be able to hear about this. So I actually went out to a Four area, and the guy was sitting on his front porch, and he was interested in what I was doing because I was still in a business suit. I explained it to him, And he just said, good luck, man. But in this voice of someone who really knew already and had a kind of resignation that there was much you can about it. So it's been a long journey for me trying to expose things.
I was expecting that there were going to be large scale insolvencies after the housing bubble. I was aware of what happened during the housing bubble and how that was engineered. In 2003, I met with George Soros. I showed him a Chart of the growth in asset backed securities, and I told him that this would be the basis of the next bubble and collapse. And he said to me, you're crazy.
So he either did not know that or he did not want to acknowledge it at that time in 2003. So what was happening was tremendous growth in the derivatives complex. So I started becoming concerned about derivatives in the very early 2000s in the aftermath of the .com bubble. At that time, The derivatives complex was about twice global GDP. By 2007, it was 10 times Global GDP that growth in maybe 5 or 6 years.
So the financialization was outstripping any real thing on earth already at that point. And this growth in asset backed Securities. What was happening was that the process of doing any credit underwriting, the moorings had been slipped, And this was done by design. Prior to this, banks would do credit underwriting, meaning they wouldn't want to get repaid money they had loans, so they would do Some analysis of whether the borrower could repay it. But during this period of time, the banking industry went to securitization of loans.
So it became a business of originating loans without any concern as to whether they could be Okay. The loans were all packaged up whether they were triple a loans or subprime loans or boat loans or Car loans, anything. These pools were stratified. Now if you think of it, you had a top 20%, the next twenty percent and so on down to bottom. And the idea was that any defaults would hit the bottom rated tranche first.
So for the defaults in that pool to reach the top of the pool, the top 20%, you'd have to blow through 80% of all the capital in the pool. So the top was rated triple a. Just structurally, they do that. The problem was no one wanted to buy the lower rated tranches. So they then used An aspect of the derivatives market, the credit default obligation, CDO, to buy the default protection for the lower rated tranches.
Then they could sell the entire pool as AAA. So this was done through as Greenspan called it, the miracles of modern finance. And he said, presumably, the risk will be borne by those best able to bear that risk at the time. So because it could all be sold as AAA and the yields were better than Treasuries and the fed was creating so much liquidity. These pools were then sold 10 times over on a modeled synthetic basis also in the derivatives market.
And so while the banks knew that they did not wanna eat their own cooking. The stuff that they had originated, they were buying The assets, this is the nature of a bubble. The people that know it's a fraud are still consuming the stuff that is being created through the same process. So the asset side of the balance sheets of banks were these securities that were being created through the same process. It reached a point where Credit default obligations alone were about 10% of the derivatives complex.
By the time the great financial crisis kicked off In 2008 and 2009, 10%. So credit to fallout obligations alone were the size of the global Now I wondered who is signing up to take that default risk. In the early stages, people are saying, well, the problem here is maybe in the 100 It's billions. They were off by an order of magnitude. It was in the tens of trillions.
So as the Fed were injecting all of this created money into the banks. It eventually became clear that the default risk had been taken by hedge fund subsidiaries within the banks themselves. So they enabled this whole thing by creating The entities within the banks that would take the other side of the default risk. And then when the collapse occurred, they were given the money to paper over that loss. The fed has murky powers that people don't know about until they decide to make it visible.
One of their powers is to create Entities out of nothing, you just create a limited liability company, and then the Fed can loan money, create money, and put it into that entity. It's completely off balance sheet. It doesn't have to be disclosed anywhere. But in this case, they did. They created something called Maiden Lane, which is a street I I sometimes walk down in this other district of Manhattan and the financial district.
So Maiden Lane was extended. This created money To buy these problematic positions out of the bags, take them off the hands of the banks. And there was so much of this problematic stuff that they then created a maiden lane 2 and a maiden lane 3. And who knows what else was created that we were not told about? So in 2008, I noticed The 1st failure of a broker dealer.
So I was expecting there to be a lot of insolvencies, and I was paying attention. And the thing that shocked me was that the client accounts in this broker dealer We're encumbered in the bankruptcy estate of the broker that never could have happened before. In all of the history of securities. They were personal property. And if the broker failed, you would say, I'm sorry, you're out of business.
Here's where you can transfer my assets. That did not happen in this case. So I started digging into what could possibly have changed, and this was as serious As a heart attack, given that we were going into this meltdown at that time, that's when I Discovered it had been done through changes to the uniform commercial code in the United States. This had been done in all 50 dates. So it was something that could be done very quietly over a long period of time and did not have to be done at the federal level, didn't draw attention.
What they did was to create a new legal construct of a security entitlement. Now prior to this, as I said, securities for 400 years were personal property. This concept of a security entitlement severed that. That's its purpose. So what people then have in institutions and in pension funds, even sophisticated investors, all they have is an entitlement.
It's a claim. It's a contractual claim, which is very weak in the event of insolvency. So it's an appearance of ownership. It's sometimes referred to as beneficial ownership, which sounds nice. But what it means is that You receive dividends.
You receive a proxy. You are the owner of title. You can of course, you can buy it and sell it, But you can see in documents that I've found that the legal owner is actually the entity that controls the Security with a secured interest. They are the legal owners of the property. So now you have a contractual claim.
Next, all of the Securities are held in pooled form, so you have no specific identification. It used to be that with paper certificates, they were numbered. You had a specific numbered bond or stock share certificate. So now they're fungible, fungible bulk, book entry Form pooled further, we know and it is absolutely irrefutable from the Fed's own response to a questionnaire from the EU that even segregated accounts, even people or institutions instead of being told that their securities are segregated are in the same pool and entitled to only a Pro rata share in the event of an insolvency of the custodian. So again, segregation is just an appearance.
People are told that it's an absolute subterfuge. And the shocking thing is that even sophisticated institutional investors do not understand this or they don't want to know it. Further, even if fraud, outright fraud is committed by the custodian. That does not obviate the ability of the secured creditors to take the securities from these Bulls ahead of the people who thought they owned them. Then there was in 2005, a change to the bankruptcy law in The United States creating something called safe harbor.
Again, that sounds nice, but what safe harbor means is safe harbor for The secured creditors to take the client assets and to make that absolutely certain that even in the event of fraud, they will take the client assets. So prior to this change in bankruptcy law, there is something called fraudulent transfer, fraudulent conveyance. And the Trustee, the bankruptcy trustee had a duty to claw back any assets that have been fraudulently transferred. So this change was made in 2005. And then with the failure of Lehman others.
This was cemented in case law, and we can see the judgment by the bankruptcy court related to this. What happened there was that JPMorgan was both the custodian for the client assets and the secured creditor that took the client assets, which prior to 2005, everything that happened there would have been constructively fraudulent. But the bankruptcy judge, this is the Southern District of New York, which is Manhattan, found in favor of JPMorgan. That JPMorgan absolutely He was entitled to take client assets. The only question was whether JPMorgan was an entitled person, basically to take the client assets.
This is an important point because it's not all secured creditors that have this power to take the client assets. It is only the very biggest banks that are entitled to take the client assets. So they don't want anyone else elbowing in there to take anything. Only they will take them. And in this judgment, the judge asked the question, Is JPMorgan a member of the protected class?
Used explicitly those words And said quite obviously as one of the biggest banks in the world, biggest financial institutions, JPMorgan is quite obviously a member of the protected To see this in a bankruptcy case law from the court, I think that's pretty strong stuff. It's Like that document directly from the fed provided to the legal certainty group. This is hard to refute. A custodian has the records of who owns what. It's in their books and records, but that's all it is.
It is the records. The system has been changed so that the property itself is then transferred up to a higher level and held in pool form. So you deal with your broker to execute a trade to buy or sell nothing, and you get a representation of an account that shows you what you have in it. But the assets are not held even at what you think is your custodian. It's Transfer to a higher level in the US.
That is the depository trust corp, which holds all securities in the United States in pool form. So the brokers themselves are low down in the food chain. In Europe, there are central security at the national level. They'd give an appearance of a registry of ownership at the national level, but by law, Under something called the Central Security Depository Regulation, CSDR, which was imposed in fourteen. By law, these securities are transferred by a mandatory link to an international central securities depository.
So they want cross border mobility of the collateral to occur. So in Sweden, for example, you have a local registry, but then the securities go up to Euroclear Belgium. So So they are subject to Belgian law, not Swedish law at that level. And then the collateral is transported To underpin the derivatives complex, which is housed at the central clearing counter parties. The acronym is the CCPs.
So this is the purpose to take the collateral up to this central clearing counterparty level. And we know from a BIS document that is now over 10 years old that The systems are in place for the movement of this collateral on a global basis nearly instantaneously, Especially in a crisis to be swept to meet the collateral demands of the system, the secured creditors. Also associated with this, we have to understand derivatives used to be bilateral, you knew When you entered into a contract who your counterparty was and you look to the credit quality of that counterparty, they were on the other side in the name of reducing risk, they actually increased risk. They created a monolithic risk because they forced central clearing so that the CCP is the counterparty on all derivatives contracts. The Central clearing parties are the counterparties.
Now what does that mean if the central clearing party itself fails? That means there is no counterparty there To honor the derivative contracts for all manner of things, but especially people that think that they have hedged their downside risk in the collapse, There's no counterparty, and the central clearing parties have been deliberately undercapitalized. So in Europe and the US, There are discussions by the participants themselves about the possibility of the central clearing parties failing. In the last few years, there have been discussions of And if you look at DTC itself, which houses all the securities in the US securities complex Ann is the central clearing party for most derivatives. They have discussion of how they will Start over again when the central clearing party collapses and explicitly that they will not put more capital behind it, But they have prefunded the startup of a new central clearing party when one of the existing ones fails.
So it's essentially planned, and the entire capital base of depository trust, so essentially, the entire US securities complex is housed there in all derivatives. The entire capital is $3,500,000,000. Individual banks have derivative positions the size of the global GDP. So something will happen to trigger this collapse implosion. I would say the cake is already baked at this time.
It's been made to happen because to take interest rates After having kept them at 0 for 15 years, which was insane to begin with and did not have to happen, It's made to happen. And then in essentially a year to take that back to over 5%. And if you're noticing they're not stopping, the rates are continuing up. I'll go through what that means For the global financial system, when interest rates were at 5%, if a bond paid $5 to simplify this. Let's say it's a perpetuity, which means you don't have to take into account a maturity date.
So if it pays $5, it's worth $100. We would pay $100 for that because interest rates are 5%. Now if interest rates are driven down by the central bank to 1% and the bond still pays $5, Now 5 is 1% of $500. So the value of the bond goes up fivefold by dropping interest This rates like that. And it was even further because they took it to 0.
So this is the source of the bubble, the financial bubble that we've experienced, the everything bubble as some people call it. And the entire financial System is basically a perpetuity. So everything is based on discounting cash flows. So all real State, the entire stock market is based on discounting back theoretical future cash flows from companies as well as bonds. Now if you do a round trip on this and you take interest rates back from 1% back to over 5%, which is something like what has happened here.
You reverse the entire thing, and you have an 80% fall in value Of everything, everything, all commercial real estate, the stock market, everything. Now imagine what happens to you if you own these things on leverage, If you borrowed to own these things, that's the problem. So the entire run up, the entire bubble was artificial, and the decline Mine will be something like a decimation where indexes will go to maybe 10% of the peak because a lot of things will just go out of business. And this is what happened with the whole .com sector when that bubble collapsed. This is what happened in the 19 thirties.
This is what happened to the Nikkei with Japan. All bubbles end this way. And when you step back and look at them, it's like a very sharp mountain peak that goes into, like, a needle blow off, and you get a 1st break and then a second run for the top that fails, and that's where we are now. If you step back and you look at something like the NASDAQ index, the 2nd top that's failing now, which is understandable given that bond yields are continuing straight up. So when this begins imploding, the insolvencies will increase due to the level of debt.
And there will be an automatic call for more collateral that will be transferred into to the derivatives complex in the central clearing counterparties. But the central clearing counterparties are themselves likely Exposed to the collapse because I say to people that you may think that you've Hedge your exposure to a decline here, but you've done it through the derivatives complex. So the risk is in the derivatives complex. It doesn't disappear, Here doesn't go away. It's all there.
And this pain will accumulate in the central clearing counter parties, and then they will fail. And they're basically telling us they will fail. And when that happens, the people that thought that they had hedged their exposure included the most Cated institutions and the pension funds will have no protection, and the secured creditors will take all of the underlying Stocks and bonds, which then gives them control of all public corporations. And once you control the capitalization structure, you then control all of the underlying real things. So this is something like what happened in the 19 thirties When there was distress globally everywhere due to debt levels, and you would think that there were no winners, But there were because the banks that were controlled by the Federal Reserve, for example, in the US, were Slated to survive, 9,000 banks in the United States were forced into failure.
The people who had money in those Banks lost all their cash, but their debts were not canceled. Their debts were then consolidated into the Federal Reserve System and Enforced. So people that were in debt were in trouble. Even wealthy people lost everything. The difference this time around is they're not going after just property that is encumbered by debt.
They've engineered this so they can take things, all securities as collateral from people and entities that have no borrowings against them. They own them clear and outright. Now let me give you an example as analogy to explain the horror of this. So you have bought a car and you paid cash for it. You think you're being very conservative.
You have no debt against the car. But Unbeknownst to you, the dealer continues to control your car as collateral. You're not told this, the dealer uses your car and all the other cars sold by the dealer as collateral for his borrowing in his business. Now the dealer goes bust and only certain Secured creditors are empowered to immediately take your car and all the cars ever sold by the Dealer without any judicial review immediately. When I describe this to people, they get worried about their Cars, this is not about your car.
This is an analogy for what has been done. It's much worse than this being about your car because it is Literally about the entire securities complex globally. So it is not about your insolvency See, that causes the loss of your assets. It's the insolvency of the people that secretly used your collateral As their property, without telling you that or disclosing it. How could this happen legally?
It's a good question, and perhaps there is some hope for humanity in avoiding this, in challenging this whole construct because it is a construct. None of this is real. There are real things in the world. This is not a real thing, But they will try to convince us that, well, I'm sorry. You've lost everything.
It's an elaborate story. So, yes, they have changed law. Can that be challenged? That's what has to happen. So this was the process.
They changed it in the uniform commercial code. This was beginning in 1994. The efforts to affect this Actually, go back further than that into the 19 sixties when they began the process of dematerialization of securities to hold them all electronically, which some people were suspicious about then, and they were right to be suspicious. It is clear that that beginning process was literally run by the CIA, and this is not conspiracy theory. The man who was Charged with forming the depository trust corp to do this in his own memoir and in interviews discloses that he was a career CIA operative from the time he was a young man.
So there was a grand Strategic purpose behind this, they've been able to do it because it has been run from the highest levels of the US government. So the involvement of the CIA, then when this construct of the securities entitlement was put into the uniform commercial code that was pushed Through all 50 states done quietly. That change was made in 1994. So it took Maybe 10 years to get it done in all the states, then they changed the bankruptcy law in 2005, and then it was ready to go with the testing of the Lehman Brothers case in 2008. So there's a plan that's executed over decades to do this.
Then they began a process of harmonization, which was to force this model in law globally, and they did this through the EU. The first discussion and documents The EU is in 2002, so that's when the process was beginning then in the aftermath of the .com bus And the EU created something they call the legal certainty group. And, again, that sounds like a good thing, but what they mean is legal certainty that the secured creditors will take the client assets. And they worked at this for years figuring out how to subvert local law. When you think about it, rights Property is kind of a sacred thing.
It's something that all people should care about. And oddly enough, even the people Participating in making this happen should care about this in a big way. So therein lies the hope of addressing this. We can come back to that. But the legal certainty group identified the problematic local law, and then it took Maybe another 10 years to come up with this CSDR regulation, Central Securities depository regulation 2014 that mandated the transport of the collateral from the local or the national level central securities depository, wherever people think They own their things outright.
Their record of ownership is there, and the securities depository level and then on to the central clearing counterparties. So it has been done in law. It's been done legally. It must be attacked legally. It must be dismantled legally.
The power behind all of this is the private control of the central banks. And when you look around the world, they are all privately controlled. You were not allowed to know actually Who controls the Federal Reserve and how it is controlled? We know that it is controlled somehow by I a set of banks. So there is some kind of an ownership structure that extends through the banks that own and control the fed.
But something like this is done in all central banks around the world. If you notice, any country Tree that has attempted to have a national bank is literally attacked and destroyed. They're not allowed to exist. So It is linked with the war machine, this private control of money, the intelligence agencies, the militaries globally Would not be able to function as they are if they weren't linked with this money creation power. We now know that when we were It's perhaps we thought that the money you borrow from the bank is someone else's savings that they're giving you.
It's a zero sum game. I think we now know with the scale of the money created during the COVID period that that is not the case. The scale outstrips any real world activity, and it's just created out of thin air. So this is the power that controls everything. They control All political parties, all governments, all the major corporations, the media, and this was the case leading into the a century in this period when the velocity money was collapsing, that is basically a collapse of their control whole system.
The money is a very sophisticated control system because it requires almost no Energy input. People are directed by chasing money incentives. But this power through chronic overuse, When it reaches this point where no matter how much money is created, it's not translating into actual economic growth, then it goes into a financial bubble and then you get the major collapse of the whole system, then they must have a plan and to stay in control through that collapse, which will require physical control over people through the reset because the money control system has broken down. So this is why you have a period of terrible instability. So as we were entering the 20th That tree, velocity money was collapsing that the Qing dynasty collapsed.
It's a global phenomenon that ended dynastic rule in China. Then in the During 1914 and 1918, the Turk Ottoman Empire collapsed, the Austro Hungarian Empire, the Russian Empire, Germany was destroyed, Lloyd and the British Empire had passed at Zenith and was really collapsing at that point. So it's a global collapse. And the people that Rolled the banking power through that, managed to stay in control, and they did it by subjugating populations. It's not about taking their money.
It's not about taking their stuff, which they don't need. It's about suppression and subjugation. And that's The lesson when you look at this period in the 19 thirties, and that is what they have planned For this kind of a cycle again, and they've set up for it. So this plan to take all collateral globally And to collapse the system in a kind of controlled demolition where they end up controlling everything. This Design was set in motion over 50 years ago.
It may have had a longer planning horizon than that, but we can see actual concrete steps beginning in 1960s with dematerialization. So when this is unfolding, this This wave of insolvencies, and it creates an urgency to take the collateral. People will be Terrified. They will be panicked, and we know that fear shuts down critical thinking. So, people will be in panic mode.
I've always been Trusted in what happened in the thirties because of talking about these things with my father who lived through that. And what I saw happening in Cleveland when I was boy. I'd try to talk with anyone who had lived through that time. And I asked my aunt, what had happened in the thirties. And she said, well, suddenly, no one had any money.
And I said, what do you mean? How could that be? And she said, well, no one had money and even wealthy families didn't have any money. And she knew families in which their daughters had been going into private schools, and they couldn't afford to go back to school. When you really look at what happened there, if you close Close all the banks, which is what FDR did.
He suddenly literally closed all the banks, and then Only certain banks were allowed to reopen, which were the ones controlled by the fed. Well, then suddenly no one had any money. It's not hard to imagine It's all just shut down suddenly. And then you have the problem that there was a drop in price level, Drop in activity and they kept the economic activity very suppressed for years. And I know that from history through the thirties, my grandfather's engineering business, I know from a family letter, but by 1936, which was 3 years after the banks had reopened, there was still no business.
3 years later, they managed to get through this both sides of my family because they had No debt. People were more conservative then, but it was very difficult. Now the other thing that and was the Federal Reserve was set up with a kind of inevitable logic that they would have to take The gold from the public, which was, of course, the monetary asset backing everything then. So The gold of the public was confiscated under the complaint that the public was hoarding the gold. But then what Did the fed do with it?
The fed hoarded the gold and did not use it to expand credit. They kept the conditions tight. So what do we have This time around, gold is not the underlying collateral in this system. It's all securities globally. So they will be taken under the argument that, well, we have to save these systemically vital institutions so that we can restart the economy again.
How could we restart the economy if they are not protected? So that will be the reason given. And it's like a game of monopoly where all of the pieces, all of the money on the board are Hold back to the bank and then they say, let's start a new game. We'll start over from the basis that we have everything and you don't. So would you like to borrow something?
And this is what the CBDC, the Central Bank Digital Currency, will be. It will be very It's called for people to refuse to use it because they literally won't be able to eat. They will have an app they can download. This will be the help. This will Be the cavalry riding to the rescue.
Just download this app and you can load your phone with some Currency to allow you to go buy milk, but every time you use that, you are actually borrowing money from them. They have you. Again, It will happen very fast. This will unfold in a very frightening crisis kind of environment, and people fully refusing. And that's why it's so important to spread this awareness of this beforehand so that people understand what happening and so that people can become engaged in this all the way to the top of the system.
It has the potential to activate very capable people all the way to the top of the system. It has the potential to unify people against this. What I tried to do with this book was to stick with things I absolutely know. And to make it a kind of whole in terms of allowing one to see, irrefutably, the whole thing with the aim of pulling it out on the table so that Everyone can have a good look at it, including the participants, including the people that are making it happen. I have the premise that This is largely being done unconsciously that the end result of this has not really been fully understood by the participants, and that perhaps Even the people at the very top of this do not understand what is about to happen and that they will be destroyed void by their own hand if they do this.
So it's the result of a kind of inevitable logic that they have, that they have to control everything that has now been taken to the ultimate degree where one can see while it's an intelligent Design, it is literally insane to actually do this because no one wants this. And that the people that have inherited this ownership layer at the very top, they did not design this. They did not put it in motion. They have allowed the juggernaut to continue. There has been no pruning in the garden.
There's been no oversight. It's literally never been looked at, never been checked. It is basically run out of control unconsciously. So we have to make it conscious all the way to the top of the system. Now another way I think about this is They study us.
We have to try to imagine who we're dealing with here. So I'm getting into conjecture about this. I have known people pretty high in the system. I have this idea that people are intimidating if you have not met them. But once you've met them, you see that they are Just people.
And I think we have to understand these are just people. They are not lizards eating babies like potato chips. That is not helpful to think of it that way. So they are actually not particularly capable people. So there is a head of the snake, but it can't do anything alone.
It is relying on the muscle beneath the head of the snake to do everything for it. And that part of the purpose of this is to push this awareness up to that muscle. Now what what would that look like? It might look like people that control corporations that are doing all the work to implement this that would realize when they see this that they didn't know anything about this, which means they do not actually have a place at the table. How might that affect their thinking?
Could they have some interesting conversations with someone when they're asked to do something? Could they perhaps decide to withdraw participation? That kind of thing we need to happen, so We have to reach people at high levels in the system. Another principle is that there's not just 1 head of the snake. It's like The hydra, there are lots of heads.
And if you cut one off, another one grows back. So you have to be able to show the entirety of this because they only understand 1 piece of it. So this is like a mirror To be able to see concisely the whole of where this is going so that you can address the many headed hydra. You know, people consider that the CIA and all the intelligence organizations are much like that. As I said, the garden has not been pruned.
There's been no oversight here, so they're all running within their missions essentially out of control. Those people also need to be aware of where this is going. Now there are people that are actual Criminals that are killers in this, but they are not the people running things. Actually, if the money is just cut off to these entities, it stops. I think that we're very close to this collapse being triggered.
What are the indications for that? Well, most profoundly, what has been done to interest rates and where they are now and the Scale of the insolvencies that are out there, they're not being discussed. They're being covered up. The only way That the financial system has not collapsed is that there is a big hidden hand injecting lots of created money directly into the financial markets holding them up right now, as well as allowing Tutions to believe they have downside risk by buying protection in the derivatives market, the combination of those things. So This support, the hidden hand as I call it, can be withdrawn at the time of their choosing, but we're getting late in this process given what's It's already happened at the interest rates.
The other indication of timing is the bank resolution, the documents So the bank resolution authority in Europe, their planning cycle documents were mandating all of the globally Systemically important banks to be ready for a solvent wind down at the end of last year, 2022. Now what they mean by Solvent wind down is not wind down of the entire bank on a solid basis. It will be parts of the bank that will main solvent, but they've literally mandated that they have to be ready, the biggest banks, to go flat on all of their derivatives positions in a controlled way suddenly. So they prepared for that. That is operational as of then last year.
Now In this year's planning cycle document, they are saying that they are on track to have completed all their work by end of this year 2023. So these are indications to give you another idea of the seriousness of this. They've been running these trilateral exercises with Britain and the EU In the US for 6 of the 7 past years, I think they may have missed a year during COVID. But in these exercises From the US side, the participants are the US treasury secretary, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, The chairman of the FDIC, the heads of all these entities in this exercise, which I've never seen before with anything. So they're very, very serious about this.
And these exercises are about assuring the cross border Transfer of the collateral when the banks are put into wind down. So you've noticed in the news that there have been some failures of banks in the last year, and that is due to this increase, this backup in interest rates, and the idea that this is a bank specific problem is not the case. These are the canaries in the coal mine. This is absolutely systemic. Again, looking back at the 19 thirties for guidance Here, the 1st big bank failure was in 1930.
It was allowed to happen, and there was a kind of trickle of bank failures. So The bank holiday when they closed everything was until 1933. So it was an unfolding banking prices for 3 years. So it's not unusual that you would have an opening stage here of a number of banks It failed, but it doesn't all let loose immediately. It unfolds over months and perhaps a couple of years before you hit the point where everything's free fall.
Well, How could things be better here? How could this go well? We have to imagine that. It seems to be overwhelming. But the first step is to Get this awareness up to the highest levels so that people realize we don't want this to happen.
It's been taken to an Sane extreme, and it's not gonna go well for anyone. Then people are left with this idea that, well, everything will just collapse. And I don't believe that at all. There is a real world with real economic activity that goes on despite This system that extracts resources from people and places enormous stress on them that Funds, psychological operations that are, of course, public facing. They're used against the population so that the resources of the public are Distracted, tremendous burdens are placed on people, stresses.
It's a system that subjugates people. And if that simply stops, Everything gets better immediately. Now how could things be different? Central banking should be a Public utility, the very idea that it should be controlled by private interests, that is the Source of all the problems for humanity that must stop as a public utility. You know, of course, banking is a useful thing to have.
We have to realize we don't have to go back to sticks and stones. We don't want everything burned to the We have to take back control of our society, which has largely been created by good people, All the innovations and usurped, so we don't owe them anything. We have good things that have been created. We just have to not allow them to control these things any longer. So public banking would be like a utility.
Any profits would be returned to the public or used to support Government. We have to have government. We have to have some way to operate society and have roads and do things that work for society. So anarchy and chaos, we can't have that. So this has to be done peacefully.
It has to be done legally. Another concept. And these are not my ideas on borrowing these things in terms of public banking, but also something like The tax system, which is really a way of harassing and, again, subjugating People, we know with the scale of money creation, things are not being funded from our tax dollars. But if we had A stable system, some kind of share of economic resources are needed to operate the government. A very simple way to do that is to place a Simple fee on every electronic money transfer wouldn't be needed for paper currency, just every electronic money transfer.
We know today that the major corporations don't pay any taxes. They aren't supporting anything. So money flows. It could be a fraction of a and especially if you end all of the wars, if you wind down the military bases, if you Of all the covert actions which are criminal, the scale of government can be right sized to what is actually beneficial to humanity. As I say, we're being governed by constructs.
They aren't even real. And if they don't Serve humanity, they must be stopped. And if we're gonna have artificial constructs, they must serve humanity. So imagine How people would feel if they were told, you don't have to file taxes anymore. That's all gonna be handled.
Just pay a tenth of a percent on whatever electronic Transfer you're doing. But the people that run this system don't want those kinds of solutions because they would eliminate their control. So my purpose with this book is to create something that will show the entirety of what this is and where it's going to do it with an economy of information and just Hard, irrefutable information and to put this in something that can travel. And that is happening. And I know already that it has reached billionaires, it's reached people all over the world, It's reached people that manage a lot of money have responsibility for that.
People in Buenos Aires and Vancouver and New Zealand and Monaco, London. So it is happening. That's what we have to have happen. And we need people at the Top of the system that are not 6 degrees separation from the head of the state, but are more like 1 or 2 degrees from the head of Snake to become aware of this and start to say something about it and start to do something about it because they realize that They are not going to be protected. As I say toward the end of the book, wealthy people think they're special.
You are special. They're saving you for dessert. And you let that sink in. So everybody has to get busy with this, Including people who believe that they are powerful and they can make a difference. And it needs to be done legally, needs to be opposed through legal means.
I mean, imagine what would happen if judges in important positions become aware of this Prosecutors, this has never really been examined in terms of how it can be dismantled. And there will be ways to do this because it is just a construct. So in terms of advice to people, and again, I can't give you financial advice. I don't know your personal I would start by saying that your happiness is important and the happiness of your family. And you should not let financial considerations cause you to do something that will drive your family in The despair.
You have to be able to get through these years. But if there are things you can do that might actually give you a relief of stress, you should consider doing those things. And one of those might be to eliminate all debt. So you have to get over this notion that you you should use borrowed money to control more stuff. They want you to do that because when the price level falls, you won't be able to service that debt.
So you take advantage of this Time remaining to sell things to pay off your debts. It does make sense to have money in the financial markets when you also have debt. There are people I know who have sold their homes, which is a tough decision to make, and are simply renting to make sure that they're not in debt at all. So you have to ask yourself, these are personal decisions, how that feels for you to do that? Another principle is to get real, so to speak.
To invest in real things, avoid Constructs and intermediaries, you want to hold things directly, have good title to them things that you can hold like that such as land, buildings and land. And you want to think about if This goes into a difficult period of years, and this can be a positive thing is to have an ability to produce food. In the thirties It's for both sides of my family. They weren't farmers, but they had to have recourse to family that had farms in order to supplement their food. It was important.
So again that can be done in a positive way. You put money into building a greenhouse, Have a big garden and orchard. Might choose to live in a more rural area. Talking with people who went through the depression, There was 1 friend of mine, much older than me. I knew he had lived through the depression, and I asked him about it.
And he said, well, you know, both my My parents were killed in an automobile accident. So I was on my grandfather's farm, and I was not aware that there was a depression. So he was on this farm with his cousins, that tells you something. As a child, they were just fine. The book I've written is called The Great Taking, and you can find it on a landing page At the great taking .com, there is a free PDF you can download.
I've done it this way because it will make it close to 0 friction so it can spread globally, and that is really happening. Some people would say, well, surely, you must be paid something for this. And I know that if I had been paid anything, I would just use it to spread the book. So why do that? Make it 0 friction.
This is the most important thing I can do right now. There are hard copy The books you can get through Lulu, and those cost something because it cost something to produce them, and they can be delivered globally. There is some Small profit in that, but I am directing that to another person who is a scientist and has done very important work.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Consider giving this account a follow for information you won’t get from the corporate media. You can read or download The Great Taking book version here: https://thegreattaking.com/read-online-or-download
reSee.it AI Summary
The open border policy in the US is not accidental; it is a deliberate strategy to weaken the country and pave the way for a one-world government. America is under attack from various angles, including the legalization of woke culture, open borders, weaponization of the DOJ, and population control measures. These actions will lead to a weaker America in the next 5-10 years, aligning with the globalists' vision of a one-world government. The question remains: how long will this continue?
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Watch: Is The US Intentionally Letting America Be Invaded To Weaken The Foundation Of The Country And Implement A One-World Government? It’s no accident that the border has remained open for millions of unchecked non-citizens to enter the US. But why? America is being attacked from what seems like all angles simultaneously. • Legalization of evil/woke culture • Open borders • Weaponization of the DOJ • Population control with many arms (food supply, abortion, trans, ‘vaccines’, etc.) When you think of where this leads to in the next 5-10 years on its current trajectory, it would result in a weaker America. Globalists have been vocal about having visions of a one-world government for many decades and to implement that, they need a weak United States. How long will this continue?
reSee.it AI Summary
The film from 1946 highlights the power of controlling information, a practice that discourages critical thought and makes people easier to control. From indoctrination to adulthood, blind trust in narratives is fostered, dismissing dissenting voices. The COVID response has shown the importance of questioning everything in a world filled with propaganda and psychological operations.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Must Watch: 1946 Film Tells The Power Of Controlling Information: This Video Was Removed From Libraries By 1967: Discouraging critical thought and questioning narratives has been practiced for many years by design. This makes people easier to control. Starting with the indoctrination of youth and lasting throughout adulthood, these concepts lead people to blindly trust what they are told. Dissenting voices are more likely to be dismissed without critical thought. How many times have you seen someone say “That’s dumb, there’s no way.”, and that thing turned out to be true? For many people, this happened with the COVID response. In today’s world that’s littered with propaganda and military-grade psychological operations, it’s extremely important to question everything.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A community trains its teachers to discourage independent thinking and promote blind acceptance. Students are told not to question authority and are taught to unquestioningly believe everything they are told. The control extends to books, newspapers, and the radio, where only the information approved by those in power is allowed. Government censorship and private interests play a role in controlling the flow of information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: See how a community trains its teachers.
Speaker 1: Bear this in mind. Young people cannot be trusted to form their own opinions. This business about open mindedness is nonsense. It's a waste of time trying to teach students to think for themselves. Own.
It's our job to tell them.
Speaker 0: And when teachers put such training into own. Despotism stands a good chance. These children are being taught to accept uncritically whatever they're told. Own. Questions are not encouraged.
Speaker 2: How can you ask such a question? Have you got a textbook? Yes, Yes, ma'am. Doth it say here that our law courts are always just? Yes, ma'am.
Then how dare you question the fact? Own. Sit down.
Speaker 0: And so we aren't surprised when?
Speaker 2: But it must be true. I saw it in this book right here.
Speaker 0: Own. And if books and newspapers and the radio are efficiently controlled, the people will read and accept exactly only what the few in control want them to. Government censorship is one form of control. Own. A newspaper which breaks a government censorship rule can be suspended.
It is also possible for newspapers and other forms of communication to be controlled by private interests.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a rare 1991 clip, George Bush announces the possibility of a "new world order." The term, once dismissed as a conspiracy theory, is now being revisited. Bush expresses optimism about the potential success of this new order.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Watch: Rare 1991 Clip Shows George Bush Announcing ‘New World Order’: Remember when the term [NWO] was mindlessly dismissed as a conspiracy theory? “We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations, a new world order.” “When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order.”, Bush says.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this historic moment, we have made significant progress in ending conflicts and the cold war. We now have the opportunity to create a new world order, where nations are governed by the rule of law instead of chaos. Our success will lead to a credible United Nations that can fulfill the vision of its founders through peacekeeping efforts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is an historic moment. We have in this past year made great progress in ending the long era of conflict and cold war. We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations. A new world order. A world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations.
When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order. An order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN's founders.
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2008, David Icke warned of a world government, central bank, army, currency, and microchipped population. He described a process called Problem > Reaction > Solution. Many dismissed it then, but time has shown the relevance of his words.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Watch: David Icke In 2008 Warning Of A World Government: "So if you want, and that's what they do want; a world government, a world central bank, a world army, a world currency (electronic, no cash), and a microchipped population,” Then what you've got to do - and this is the way they work - a process I call Problem > Reaction > Solution.”, David says. How many people would have laughed this off or called it crazy in 2008? This has aged quite well.
Video Transcript AI Summary
They want a world government, central bank, army, currency, and microchipped population. They use a tactic called problem reaction solution to achieve this. They create problems, make people react, and then offer solutions that centralize power. The financial industry is a prime example. If we don't wake up, we'll live in a global fascist dictatorship.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you want, which is what they do want, a world government, a world central bank, a world army, amalgamation of NATO and the UN peacekeeping operation, a world currency, electronic, no cash, and a microchip population, then what you've got to do, and this is the way they work, a process I call problem reaction solution, you've got to keep creating the problems, get the people to react, do something in fear and outrage, all of what's happening, what they're going to do about it, and then they, who've covertly created the problem, offer the solutions to the problems they've created, which is the constant centralization of power. That's what all the solutions are. And we're seeing such a wonderful example now with what's happening in the financial industry. And if we don't wake up, we're going to live in a global fascist dictatorship.
reSee.it AI Summary
In this thought-provoking video, the dangers of media centralization are explored. By controlling information flow, it sets boundaries and discredits alternative viewpoints. Back in 1917, 12 news managers were hired by JP Morgan interests to control the policy of influential newspapers. This led to today's media monopoly, often seen as propaganda. However, society seems ready to embrace independent media and unbiased sources. Will this be the turning point?
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Watch: Powerful Video: Will This Video Make You Abandon Corporate Media Forever? This is an extremely interesting video. Centralization of media creates an extremely dangerous environment by controlling the flow of information that people consume. It sets boundaries and frames the narratives for society to blindly follow, while discrediting alternative viewpoints. In 1917, JP Morgan interests hired 12 high ranking news managers. Those 12 determined the most influential newspapers in America. They were to figure out how many news organizations it would take to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States. It was found that it was only necessary to purchase the control of the top 25. An agreement was reached. This snowballed into the monopoly on media we see today that has largely become propaganda. It feels like we’re reaching an inflection point, where society is ready to accept independent media and various sources who aren’t bought and paid for or compromised.
Video Transcript AI Summary
World of Picture Television is a news outlet that relies on central news agencies Reuters and the Associated Press, both of which were bought by the Rothschild family. The Rothschilds also control major TV networks, radio stations, newspapers, and publishing empires through their corporate conglomerates. These conglomerates include General Electric and Westinghouse, which profit from promoting wars. The internet, publishing, recording, and top cable companies are also controlled by the Rothschild, JPMorgan, Rockefeller, and Oppenheimer Brotherhood. These media owners have corporate sponsors who support their pro-business and pro-government programming. The video also mentions instances of fabricated news and the influence of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) in shaping media agendas.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: World of Picture Television brings us the news of the world through 2 central news agencies called Reuters and the Associated Press. The Rothschilds bought Reuters in the 1800s which later bought the Associated Press and made the Rothschild family owners of the world's largest central news services. To the present day, the world depends on these Rothschild owned central news services as their main source of news and information. In his book called Who Owns the TV Networks? Author Eustace Mullins claims The major TV networks, radio stations, newspapers, and publishing empires are controlled by the Rothschild, Rockefeller, and JPMorgan money cartels sells through their corporate conglomerates.
The bankster owned media conglomerates include weapons manufacturers General Electric and Westinghouse which profit from promoting wars. Control over the internet, publishing, recording, and top cable companies can be traced back to the same big Five media empires: General Electric, Time Warner, Viacom, Disney, and News Corp. These media These are owned directly or indirectly by the Rothschild, JPMorgan, Rockefeller, and Oppenheimer Brotherhood. Yes, there are now more stations and more media voices but they're all coming from the same ventriloquist. Every TV show needs corporate sponsors and corporate Sponsors sponsor pro business, pro government programming, and journalists who support the agenda of the Big Five media owners.
While 2 thirds of the world goes hungry, these banksters offer kazillion dollar sponsorships to sports athletes to play with their balls. Why? Because they keep the masses distracted from the important issues.
Speaker 1: And welcome back to the show, ice cream, you scream. You know the rest.
Speaker 2: Ice cream, you scream. You know The rest.
Speaker 1: I scream, you scream, you know the rest. I scream, you scream. You know the rest. Well, I scream, you scream, you know the rest. I scream, you scream.
Speaker 3: Well, you know I scream, you scream.
Speaker 2: Well, you know the rest.
Speaker 3: I scream, you scream. We all well, you know the rest.
Speaker 1: I scream, you scream, you know the rest. I Screen, you scream. We all know the rest. I scream, you scream. You know the rest.
Speaker 3: I scream, you scream. Well, you know the rest.
Speaker 1: I scream, you scream. You know the rest.
Speaker 3: A child's happiness is priceless, especially on a birthday. A child's happiness is priceless, Especially on a birthday.
Speaker 0: Happiness in a price list, especially on a
Speaker 2: 1st, the severe flooding here in the northeast as more rain continues to fall today, NBCC's Michelle Kaczynski, I guess she's in a canoe, is in Wayne, New Jersey this morning. Michelle, good morning to you.
Speaker 1: Good morning. Well, obviously, we're getting a nice break from the rain, but not the flooding. This is essentially now a part of the Passaic River in this neighborhood. It rushed in yesterday.
Speaker 0: I just got a Picture of the conditions that Caleb Brown has been living in for the past 2 months. Essentially, she was by the neck inside of what would look like a steel cage, roughly 4 by 4 by 6, and that steel cage was then inside of a larger, container. Now a massive search is underway this field behind me because the victim herself told police that she believes as many as 4 bodies may be buried here. George?
Speaker 4: Boy, that is just horrific. An ABC news producer is being investigated by the network after reported evidence that a live camera shot on Good Morning America was doctored By falsely stringing police tape in the background. The shot featured reporter Lindsey Davis in Woodruff, South Carolina, where a woman was allegedly held captive in a storage by a registered sex offender. Behind Davis, yellow police tape can be seen with the words sheriff's line do not cross. A wider Photograph of the scene shows that police tape was actually just attached to some ABC camera equipment to enhance the scene.
Speaker 5: Dateline NBC, A prime time news program airs a story in 1992 entitled, Waiting to Explode. The story includes footage demonstrating that a line of trucks produced by General Motors readily explode on impact.
Speaker 6: To see for ourselves What might happen in a side impact crash, Dateline NBC hired the Institute For Safety Analysis to conduct crash At impact, a small hole was punctured in the tank. According To our experts, the pressure of the collision and the crushing of the gas tank forced gasoline to spew from the gas cap. The fuel then erupted into flames when When ignited by the impact in cars' headlight.
Speaker 5: After the program airs, one of the firemen at the taping of the crash contacts GM. The conversation inspires a full scale investigation. 3 months later, NBC is forced to reveal their role in fabricating the news.
Speaker 7: NBC's contractor did put incendiary devices under the trucks To ensure that there would be a fire if gasoline were released from the truck's gas tank.
Speaker 3: We said the crash, quote, forced gasoline to spew from the fuel cap, GM says since the gas cap was the wrong cap for the GM filler tube and because the gas tank was overfilled, the cap Came off when the impact occurred.
Speaker 7: We agree with GM that we should have told our viewers about these devices.
Speaker 3: The Dateline reporter, however, said, quote, at impact, a small hole was punctured in the tank, unquote. GM has now x rayed that tank and found No hole.
Speaker 7: We acknowledge the placing of the incendiary devices under the truck was a bad idea from start to finish.
Speaker 3: That's our new policy and And we'll be right back.
Speaker 8: Look at the pyramid. In the first couple layers, the really eager, hardworking young journalists are out there trying to get the stories, He's trying to make a name so they can move up that pyramid. Well, the further they move up the pyramid, the more Or they realize that, you know, the outlets really aren't interested in Major news that rocks the boat.
Speaker 5: The boat Charles refers to belongs to those at the top of the pyramid, where the interests of the Media outlets are quietly defined. Representative Oscar Callaway enters a disturbing statement into the US congressional record. The statement reveals why JP Morgan interests hired 12 high ranking news managers. The 12 were asked to determine the most influential newspapers in America. They were to figure out how many news organizations it would take to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States.
The 12 found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. An agreement was reached. The policy of the papers was bought and an editor was placed in each paper to ensure that all published information was in keeping with the new policy. Soon, that policy would be defined by a front group formed by JP Morgan and his colleagues. In fact, Morgan's personal attorney was founding president of the organization, The council on foreign relations.
Today, the CFR maintains that its goal is to increase America's understanding of the world. However, the actual objective of this highly club is revealed by the rare admissions of the insiders themselves. In the early sixties, a Georgetown University professor collects information for a book favorable to the network of powerful men who founded the CFR. Afar. For 2 years, professor Carol Quigley is allowed to examine the confidential papers And secret records of this network.
Quigley reveals that these men aim to create a world system of financial control in private hands. Able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. In short, they seek Total and quiet control of the entire world. And the CFR is their most visible conduit for For carrying out that agenda. CFR members include America's wealthiest tycoons As well as the highly placed elite in government, academic institutions, tax exempt foundations and the establishment media.
Ruling class journalists written by Richard Harwood describes the CFR membership as the ruling establishment in the United States. The Washington Post article boasted that news reporters who are CFR members do not merely analyze and interpret foreign policy For the United States, they helped make it. Who are these policymakers? Many of their Places are familiar. NBC's Tom Brokaw, CBS's Dan Rather, ABC's Barbara Walters, Jim Lehrer of PBS, William f Buckley of National Review, media mogul Kurt Murdoch, owner of the giant multifaceted news corporation.
These media heavyweights and many others like them are members of the CFR. Powerful corporations are also invited to become members. At the close of 20th century, CFR influence presided over far reaching consolidations of media control. In 1995, CFR members Michael Eisner of Disney and ABC's Thomas Murphy merged their media empires. Soon after the merger, The Disney ABC empire becomes a CFR corporate member.
In the year 2000, the world's largest Internet service provider, America Online, joins forces with Time Warner, one of the world's largest news organizations. The CEOs favoring the move are CNN's Thomas Johnson and Time Warner's Gerald Levin, both CFR members. Once again, another media giant is created under the shadow of CFR influence. Today, an elite handful of individuals define the agendas that are supported by the empire of establishment news.
Speaker 1: Do you have any people being paid
Speaker 9: by The CIA who are contributing to a major American Journal.
Speaker 10: We do have people who submit pieces to other to American journals.
Speaker 1: Do you have any people Paid
Speaker 9: by the CIA who are working for
Speaker 1: Television networks.
Speaker 10: This I think gets into the kind of, getting into the details, mister chairman, that I
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
@TuckerCarlson What are your thoughts?
reSee.it AI Summary
In a revealing interview, CIA Officer Frank Sepp exposes the practice of planting false information in major newspapers. This targeted propaganda aims to manipulate public opinion, manufacture consent for wars, and control narratives. By omitting context, oversimplifying issues, and demonizing leaders, the media becomes a tool for spreading state department propaganda. Operation Mockingbird, a notorious CIA program, continues to influence media today. Watch the clip for eye-opening insights.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Must Watch: Exposing Targeted Propaganda: CIA Officer Frank Sepp Discusses Planting Stories In Major Newspapers: In 1983, Frank Snepp casually discussed the CIA’s practice of ‘planting’ false information in the media. Note that those who push the CIA stories are unable to “fact check” them, just like the fact checkers are not able to fact check stories. Propaganda media is used to manufacture consent for wars & conflict by telling half truths, deliberately leaving out context, oversimplification of an issue, dehumanizing the intended target, demonizing leaders/groups & constantly parroting state department propaganda slogans. This is what creates boundaries for the approved narratives that society blindly follows. Operation Mockingbird is alive and well today. Bookmark this clip for later or play on 1.25x speed if you’re short on time.
Video Transcript AI Summary
During my time at the CIA, I was responsible for briefing the press and circulating disinformation. Disinformation is not necessarily a lie, but rather a half truth. We would select influential journalists and provide them with information that we wanted to convey to the American public. We targeted respected journalists like Robert Chaplin, Kais Beach, Bud Merrick, Malcolm Brown, and Maynard Parker. I would cultivate their trust by sharing valid information and then slip in the data we wanted to spread, which may not have been true. We would also create an environment where journalists couldn't fact-check by briefing diplomats who would confirm our false information. Personally, I am opposed to these disinformation activities as they serve no useful purpose for the CIA.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You briefed the press, did you not, when you were there? Well, I had several jobs. One of my jobs was that of and indeed brief the press when we, the CIA, wanted to, circulate disinformation on a particular issue. Disinformation is not necessarily not necessarily a lie. It may be a half truth.
And, we would pick out a journalist. I would go do the briefing and hope that he would put the information in print. For instance, if we wanted to get, across to the American public, that the North Vietnamese were building up their force structure in South Vietnam, I would go to a journalist and advise him that in the past, 6 months, x number of North Vietnamese forces had come down the Ho Chi Minh Trail System them through Southern Laos. So either he goes with the information or he doesn't, and ordinarily or usually the journalists would go with it because it was it looked like some kind of exclusive. And I would say our percentage planning that kind of data was 70 to 80%.
The correspondence we targeted were those who had terrific influence, the most respected journalists in Saigon, like Robert Chaplin of the New Yorker Magazine, Kais Beach, of the Los Angeles Times from time to time, and also he worked for the Chicago Daily News, Bud Merrick of US News and World Report, Malcolm Brown of The New York Times, even Maynard Parker of Newsweek Magazine. We would go after these gentlemen. I would be directed to cultivate them, to spend time with them at, to the Caravel Hotel or the Continental Hotel to socialize with them and and slowly but surely to try to gain their confidence by doppling out, valid information, information which was true. And then I would drop in into a conversation the data that we wanted to get across, which might not be true. One piece of data, for instance, that we managed to plan in the New Yorker magazine had to do with a a supposed North Vietnamese effort in 1973 to develop airfields along the border of South Vietnam.
The reason we wanted to plant this information was that we were trying to persuade the US Congress that Saigon should be continued to should continue to get a great deal of aid, and that the North Vietnamese were the chief violators of the ceasefire accord. That was printed in the New Yorker magazine under the byline of Robert Chaplin, as indeed was a great deal of such information which which we're trying to circulate. If I planted a piece of information with a reporter, I would ordinarily then try to create an environment in which he could not check the information. I would go to the British ambassador and brief him on the disinformation I had just given the reporter. So when the reporter wanted to cross check what I told him with, say, the British ambassador, New Zealand ambassador, or what have you.
He would get false confirmation, the same message coming back at him, and he'd say, I've got proof that Frank Snapp told me the truth, when in fact, what he'd gotten was simply an echo of what, I'd given him in in the 1st place via a British ambassador or other of our friendly diplomatic contacts. I am as an ex CIA agent opposed to the disinformation activities, in which I was involved. I admit that I was involved, and I think it, served no useful purpose, propagandizing the American, public or congress is not the CIA's job.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
@iluminatibot https://t.co/ypD6wUEMHp
reSee.it AI Summary
In a rare 1994 video, David Rockefeller advocates for depopulation, expressing concern about the negative impact of population growth on our ecosystems. He emphasizes the role of the United Nations in stabilizing the world population. This clip sheds light on their plans, involving both the private sector and government bodies. Follow this account for alternative information not covered by corporate media.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Must Watch: Rare 1994 Video Shows David Rockefeller Advocating For Depopulation Of The Planet: At the 1994 Annual UN Ambassadors' Dinner, David Rockefeller calls for the reduction of the world’s population. The clip gets even more concerning when he references the year 2020. “The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.” “The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing the world population.”, Rockefeller says. It’s important to listen to this entire clip to understand how they plan to accomplish this, utilizing both the private sector & government bodies. This should tell you everything you need to know about what’s going on.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Improved public health has led to a decline in infant mortality and an increase in life expectancy. However, this has also resulted in a rapid population growth, which is negatively impacting our ecosystems. The exploitation of energy and water resources, along with increased pollution, is a major concern. To address these challenges, nations must work together to tackle population growth, overconsumption, and environmental degradation. The recent UN meeting in Cairo focused on population growth, but controversies arose due to the divisive nature of the issue. The United Nations should play a crucial role in stabilizing population and promoting economic development while considering moral and religious aspects. Sustainable growth and global development were discussed at the Rio de Janeiro conference, emphasizing the need for private sector management and regulation by governments and international bodies. International trade entities like the European Economic Community, NAFTA, APEC, and the World Trade Organization can contribute to sustainable development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And herein lies the dilemma that we all face. Let me illustrate. Improved public health has caused the world's infant mortality rate to decline by 60% over the last 40 years. In the same period, the world's average life expectancy has increased from 46 years in 19 fifties to 63 years today. This is a development of which, as individuals, we can only applaud.
However, the result of these positive measures is a world population that has risen during the same short period of time, geometrically, to almost 6,000,000,000 people and could easily exceed 6,000,000,000 by the year 2020. The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident. In particular, the rapid and growing exploitation of the world's supply of energy and water is a matter of deep concern, and the toxic byproducts utilization of increased atmospheric pollution to dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross border challenges posed by population growth, overconsumption of resources, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened. The recent UN meeting in Cairo has appropriately focused on one of these key issues, population growth.
But the controversies which have erupted at the conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues that are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension. The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing world population and stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is of course an inevitable corollary of a growing population, and is essential to improve standards of living, but without careful coordination, unrestrained economic growth poses further threats to our environment. This was a major subject discussion at the conference in Rio de Janeiro on the environment 2 years ago. The focus then was on sustainable growth and global development.
It was pointed out at the conference that growth is most efficiently managed by the private sector, but regulation of the process by national governments and international bodies is also needed. And once again, United Nations should certainly be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process. But in addition, given the importance of unencumbered international trade in stimulating and facilitating economic growth, Some of the newer economic entities such as the European Economic Community, NAFTA, APEC, and most importantly, GATT, now known as the World Trade Organization, are probably best suited to play a major role in ensuring sustainable development.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Consider giving this account a follow for information you’ll never see from the corporate media.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a rare 1994 video, David Rockefeller advocates for reducing the world's population due to its negative impact on planetary ecosystems. He emphasizes the United Nations' role in stabilizing population growth. The clip reveals plans involving the private sector and government bodies. This unsettling footage sheds light on the situation at hand.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Must Watch: Rare 1994 Video Shows David Rockefeller Advocating For Depopulation Of The Planet: At the 1994 Annual UN Ambassadors' Dinner, David Rockefeller calls for the reduction of the world’s population. The clip gets even more concerning when he references the year 2020. “The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.” “The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing the world population.”, Rockefeller says. It’s important to listen to this entire clip to understand how they plan to accomplish this, utilizing both the private sector & government bodies. This should tell you everything you need to know about what’s going on.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Improved public health has led to a decline in infant mortality and an increase in life expectancy. However, this has also resulted in a rapid population growth, which is negatively impacting our ecosystems. The exploitation of energy and water resources, along with increased pollution, is a major concern. To address these challenges, nations must work together to tackle population growth, overconsumption, and environmental degradation. The recent UN meeting in Cairo focused on population growth, but controversies arose due to the divisive nature of the issue. The United Nations should play a crucial role in stabilizing population and promoting economic development while considering moral and religious factors. Sustainable growth and global development were discussed at the Rio de Janeiro conference, emphasizing the need for private sector management and regulation by governments and international bodies. International trade entities like the European Economic Community, NAFTA, APEC, and the World Trade Organization can contribute to sustainable development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And herein lies the dilemma that we all face. Let me illustrate. Improved public health has caused the world's infant mortality rate to decline by 60% over the last 40 years. In the same period, the world's average life expectancy has increased from 46 years in 19 fifties to 63 years today. This is a development of which, as individuals, we can only applaud.
However, the result of these positive measures is a world population that has risen during the same short period of time, geometrically, to almost 6,000,000,000 people and could easily exceed 6,000,000,000 by the year 2020. The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident. In particular, the rapid and growing exploitation of the world's supply of energy and water is a matter of deep concern, and the toxic byproducts utilization of increased atmospheric pollution to dangerous levels. Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross border challenges posed by population growth, overconsumption of resources, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened. The recent UN meeting in Cairo has appropriately focused on one of these key issues, population growth.
But the controversies which have erupted at the conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues that are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension. The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing world population and stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is of course an inevitable corollary of a growing population, and is essential to improve standards of living, but without careful coordination, unrestrained economic growth poses further threats to our environment. This was a major subject discussion at the conference in Rio de Janeiro on the environment 2 years ago. The focus then was on sustainable growth and global development.
It was pointed out at the conference that growth is most efficiently managed by the private sector, but regulation of the process by national governments and international bodies is also needed. And once again, United Nations should certainly be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process. But in addition, given the importance of unencumbered international trade in stimulating and facilitating economic growth, Some of the newer economic entities such as the European Economic Community, NAFTA, APEC, and most importantly, GATT, now known as the World Trade Organization, are probably best suited to play a major role in ensuring sustainable development.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
@jordanbpeterson https://t.co/qx7h2P7TTt
reSee.it AI Summary
In a buried video, Hillary Clinton praises George Soros, expressing admiration for his work promoting an open society. Soros acknowledges his engagement in the US electoral process and his financial support for those who share his vision. This raises concerns about efforts to dismantle the United States and impose a globalist agenda. Watch the revealing clip for yourself.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Must Watch: Buried Video Of Hillary Clinton Praising George Soros: George Soros, “I am very proud to be introduced by Hillary. I’ve seen her in operation; I have great, great admiration for her. I’ve seen her deliver a speech in Davos about open society,” It gets even worse… Soros says, “I need to stand up and do something and become really engaged in the electoral process in this country [USA]. In my foundations, basically, I have provided financial support for people in those countries who believe in the idea of an open society.” There is an effort to break down the United States and force a globalist order upon it. Watch the entire clip for yourself.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We have been given an extraordinary blessing and our country needs people like George Soros who are fearless and willing to step up. George Soros is introduced by Hillary, who admires her greatly. He praises her speech on open society and her effectiveness in visiting Central Asia. Soros agrees with Hillary that there are people who now feel the need to get involved in electoral politics. He feels the same way and wants to become engaged in the electoral process in the US. In his foundations, he has supported those who believe in the idea of an open society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have been given an extraordinary we have been given an extraordinary blessing, and at this moment in time, our country needs us and we need people like George Soros who is fearless and willing to step up when it counts. So please join me in welcoming George Soros.
Speaker 1: I'm very, very proud to be introduced by Hillary. I've seen her in operation. I have great, great admiration for her. I see her deliver a speech at in Davos about open society, that explained the ideas better than anybody else that I've heard. I've seen her, visit Central Asia where I have foundations, and she was really very effective, more effective than Most of our statesmen and I think she hit the nail on the head, when she said That there are people who have never been involved in a very active way in electoral, politics who now feel, the need to do so, and I stand here before you as such a person.
It is the first time that I feel that I need to stand up and do something really, and become really engaged, in the electoral process in in this country, in in my foundations, basically, I have provided financial support for people In those countries who believed in the idea of an open society
reSee.it AI Summary
In 1976, an emergency vaccine was hastily administered in the USA for an imaginary pandemic, resulting in injuries and deaths. This video highlights the similarity between those tactics and the recent COVID vaccine rollout. Society's trust in once-reliable institutions seems to have waned. If people were better informed, would they have chosen differently? Watch the video at 1.25X speed or save it for later.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Must Watch: Did You Know? In 1976, An Emergency Vaccine Was Pushed On The USA For An Imaginary Pandemic: As a result of this, American citizens were injured and even killed. This video serves as powerful reminder that tactics used in recent years with COVID vaccines have been around for many years. It feels like society is at a point where people have lost faith in institutions that were previously viewed as being trustworthy. If people were properly informed, how many would’ve refused the shots? This is a longer clip so consider playing it on 1.25X speed or bookmarking it for later if you’re short on time.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1976, the US government urged everyone to get a swine flu shot to prevent a potential pandemic. However, 4,000 Americans are now claiming damages of $3.5 billion due to neurological damage or death allegedly caused by the flu shot. One victim, Judy Roberts, developed Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) and was paralyzed for six months. She now suffers from partial paralysis and mobility issues. The government claims they were not aware of the potential complications, but evidence suggests otherwise. Victims are still waiting for their claims to be resolved. The video highlights the lack of transparency and accountability in the government's handling of the swine flu vaccination program.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is upon us. Which type will we worry about this year? And what kind of shots will we be told to take? Remember the swine flu scare of 1976? That was the year the US government told us all that swine flu could turn out to be a killer that could spread across the nation.
And Washington decided that Every man, woman, and child in the nation should get a shot to prevent a nationwide outbreak, a pandemic. Well, 46,000,000 of us obviately took the shot. And now 4000 Americans are claiming damages from Uncle Sam amounting to $3,500,000,000 because of what happened when they took that shot. By far, the greatest number of the claims, 2 thirds of them, are for neurological damage or even death, allegedly triggered by the flu shot. We pick up the story back in 1976 when the threat posed by the swine flu virus seemed very real indeed.
Speaker 1: This virus was the cause of a pandemic in 1918 and 1919 that resulted in over Half a 1000000 deaths in the United States as well as 20,000,000 deaths around the world.
Speaker 2: See how easy it is
Speaker 0: to publicity machine was cranked into action to urge all America to protect itself against the swine flu menace.
Speaker 2: Influenza is serious business. During major flu epidemics, millions of people are sick and thousands die. Well, this year, you can get protection. The vaccines are safe, Easy to take, and they can protect you against flu. So roll up your sleeve.
Protect yourself.
Speaker 0: One of those who did roll up her sleeve was Judy Roberts. She was perfectly healthy, an active woman, when in November of 1976, she took her shot. 2 weeks later, she says she began to feel a numbness starting up her legs.
Speaker 3: I joked about it at that time. I said I'll be numb to the knees by Friday as if this keeps up. By the following week, I was totally paralyzed.
Speaker 0: So completely paralyzed, in fact, that they had to operate on her to enable her to breathe. And for 6 months, Judy Roberts was a quadriplegic. The diagnosis? A neurological disorder called Guillain Barre Syndrome, GBS for short. These neurological diseases are little understood.
They affect people in different ways. As you can see in these home movies taken by a friend, Judy Roberts' paralysis confined her mostly to a wheelchair for over a year. But this disease can even kill. Indeed, there are 300 claims now pending from the families of GBS victims who died, allegedly as a result of the swine flu shot. In other GBS victims, the crippling effects diminish and all but disappear.
But for Judy Roberts, progress back to good health has been painful And partial. Now I notice that your smile, Judy, is a little bit constricted.
Speaker 3: Yes. It is.
Speaker 0: Is it different from what it used to be?
Speaker 3: Very different. I have, a greatly decreased mobility in my lips. And, I can't drink through a straw on the right hand side. I can't blow out birthday candles. I don't whistle anymore, for which my husband is grateful.
Speaker 0: It may be a little difficult for you to answer this question, but have you recovered as much as you are going to recover?
Speaker 3: Yes. This this is it.
Speaker 0: So you will now have a legacy of braces on your legs for the rest of your life?
Speaker 3: Yes. The weakness in my hands will stay and The leg braces will stay.
Speaker 0: So Judy Roberts and her husband have filed a claim against the US government. They're asking twelve $1,000,000, though they don't expect to get nearly that much. Judy, why did you take the flu shot?
Speaker 3: I'd never taken any other flu shots, but I felt like this was Going to be a major epidemic. And the only way to prevent a major epidemic of a a really deadly variety of flu was for everybody to be Right.
Speaker 0: Where did this so called deadly variety of flu, where did it first hit back in 1976? It began right here at Fort Dix in New Jersey in January That year when a number of recruits began to complain of respiratory ailments, something like the common cold. An army doctor here sent samples of their fruit cultures to the New Jersey public health lab to find out just what kind of bug was going around here. One of those samples was from a private David Lewis who had left his sick bed to go a forced march. Private Lewis had collapsed on that march and his sergeant had revived him by mouth to mouth resuscitation.
But the sergeant showed no signs of illness. A few days later, Private Lewis died.
Speaker 3: If this disease is so potentially fatal that it's going to kill a young, healthy man, Middle aged school teacher didn't have prayer.
Speaker 0: The New Jersey lab identified most of those soldiers' throat cultures as the normal kind of flu virus going that year, but they could not make out what kind of virus was in the culture from the dead soldier and from 4 others who were sick. So they sent those cultures to the Federal Center For Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia for further study. A few days later they got the verdict, swine flu. But that much publicized outbreak of swine flu at Fort Dix involved only Private Lewis who died and those 4 other who recovered completely without the swine flu shot.
Speaker 3: If I had known at that time that the boy had been in a sick bed, Got up, went out on a forced march, and then collapsed and died. I would never have taken a shot.
Speaker 4: The rationale for our recommendation was not on The basis of the death of, a single individual. But it was on the basis that when we do see a change in the characteristics of the influenza virus, It is a massive public health problem in this country.
Speaker 0: Doctor David Sensor, then head of the CDC, the Center For Disease Control in Atlanta, Is now in private industry. He devised the swine flu program and he pushed it. You began to give flu shots to the American people in October of 76. October 1st. By that time, how many cases of swine flu around the world had been reported?
Speaker 4: There had been, Several reported, but none confirmed. There had been cases in, Australia that were reported by the press, by the news media, there were cases in none confirmed.
Speaker 0: Did you ever uncover any other outbreaks of swine flu anywhere in the world? No. Now nearly Everyone was to receive the shock in a public health facility where a doctor might not be present. Therefore, it was up to the CDC to come up with some kind of official consent form Giving the public all the information it needed about the swine flu shot. This form stated that the swine flu vaccine had been tested.
What it didn't say was that after those tests were completed, the scientists developed another vaccine. And that was the one given to most of the 46,000,000 who took the shot. That vaccine was called X 53 a. Was X 53 a ever field tested?
Speaker 4: I I can't say. I would have to,
Speaker 0: It wasn't. I don't know. Well, not would think that you're
Speaker 4: in charge of the program. I would have to check, the records. I haven't looked at this in some time.
Speaker 0: The information form, the consent form, was also supposed to warn people about any risks of serious complications following the shot. But did it?
Speaker 5: No. I had never heard
Speaker 3: of any reactions other than a sore arm, fever, this sort of thing.
Speaker 0: Judy Roberts' husband, Gene, also took the shot.
Speaker 6: Yes. I looked at that document. I signed it. Nothing on this said I was gonna have a heart attack or I can get Guillain Barre, which I never heard of.
Speaker 0: What if people from the government, from the Center For Disease Control, what if they had indeed known about it? What would be your feeling?
Speaker 3: They should have told us.
Speaker 0: Did anyone ever come to you and say, you know something, fellas? There's the possibility of neurological damage if you get into a mass immunization program? No. No one ever did? No.
Do you know Michael Hatwick? Yes. Mhmm. Doctor. Michael Hatwick directed the surveillance team for the swine flu program at the CDC.
His job was to find out what possible complications could arise Taking the shot and to report his findings to those in charge. Did you know ahead of time, Doctor. Hatwick, That there had been case reports of neurological disorders, neurological illness, apparently associated with the injection of influenza vaccine? Absolutely. You did?
Speaker 4: Yes.
Speaker 0: How'd you know that?
Speaker 4: By review of the literature.
Speaker 0: So you told your superiors, the men in charge of the swine flu immunization program, about the possibility of neurological disorders? Absolutely.
Speaker 7: What What
Speaker 0: would you say if I told you that your superiors say that you never told them about the possibility of neurological complications?
Speaker 8: That's nonsense. I can't believe that they would say that they did not know that there were neurological illnesses associated with influenza vaccination. That simply is not true. We did know
Speaker 4: that. I've said that doctor Hatwick had never told me of, his feelings on this subject, and he's lying.
Speaker 0: I guess you would have to make that assumption. Then why does this report From your own agency, dated July 1976, list neurological complications as a possibility. I think the,
Speaker 4: Consensus of, the scientific community was that the evidence relating Neurologic disorders to influenza immunization. That they did not feel that this association
Speaker 0: was a real one. You didn't feel it was necessary Tell the people that information.
Speaker 4: I think that, over the the years, we have tried to inform the American people as as fully as possible.
Speaker 0: As part of informing Americans about the swine flu threat, Doctor. Senzer's CDC also helped create the advertising to get the public to take the shot. Let me read to you from one of your phone agencies' memos planning the campaign to urge Americans to take the shot. The swine flu vaccine has been taken by many important persons, he wrote. Example, president Ford, Henry Kissinger, Elton John, Muhammad Ali, Mary Tyler Moore, Rudolph Nureyev, Walter Cronkite, Ralph Nader, Edward Kennedy, etcetera, etcetera.
True. I'm not familiar
Speaker 4: with that particular piece of paper, but I do know that at least of that group, president Ford did take vaccination.
Speaker 0: Did you talk to these people beforehand to find out if they plan to take the shot?
Speaker 4: I did not know.
Speaker 0: Did anybody? I do not know. Did you get permission to use their names in your campaign? I do not know. Mary, did you take a swine flu shot?
Speaker 5: No, I did not.
Speaker 0: Did you give them permission to use your name saying that you had or were going to?
Speaker 5: Absolutely not. Never did.
Speaker 0: Did you ask your own doctor about taking the swine flu shot?
Speaker 5: Yes. And at the time, he thought it might be Good idea. But I resisted it because I was leery of having the symptoms that sometimes go with that kind of inoculation.
Speaker 0: So you didn't?
Speaker 5: No, I didn't.
Speaker 0: Have you spoken to your doctor since? Yes, ma'am.
Speaker 5: He's delighted that I didn't take that shot.
Speaker 0: You're in charge. Somebody's in charge.
Speaker 1: There are
Speaker 0: This is your advertising strategy that I have a copy of here. Who's it signed by? This one is unsigned. But you you'll acknowledge that it was your baby, so to speak.
Speaker 4: Could it have been from, Department of Health Education and Welfare? Could it be from CDC? I don't know. I'll be happy to take, responsibility for it.
Speaker 0: It's been 3 years now since you fell ill with GBS. Right?
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 0: Has the federal government, in your estimation, played fair with you about your claim?
Speaker 3: No. I don't think so. It seems to be dragging on and On and on. And, really, no end in sight that I can see at this point.
Speaker 9: With respect to the cases of Guillain Barre, Allegedly
Speaker 0: Former secretary of HEW Joseph Califano too was disturbed that there was no end in sight. So a year and a ago he promised that uncle Sam would cut the bureaucratic red tape for victims suffering from GBS and would pay up quickly.
Speaker 9: We shouldn't hold them to an impossible or too difficult standard of proving that they were hurt. Even if we pay a few people a few $1,000 that might not Deserved it. I think justice requires that we promptly pay those people who do deserve it.
Speaker 0: Who's making the decision to be so hard nosed about settling?
Speaker 9: Well, I assume the, justice department is.
Speaker 0: Griffin Bell before he left?
Speaker 9: Well, the justice department agreed to the statement I made. It was cleared word for word with the lawyers in the justice department by my HEW lawyers.
Speaker 0: And that statement said, in effect, that that statement said that we should pay,
Speaker 9: Guillaume Barre claims without regard to whether the federal government was negligent if they re if they resulted from the swine flu shot.
Speaker 6: I think the government knows it's wrong.
Speaker 3: If it drags out long enough, then people will just give up. Let it go.
Speaker 6: I I am a little more adamant in my thoughts than my wife is because, I asked told Judy to take the shots. She wasn't gonna take it, and, she never had had shots. And, I'm mad with my government because they knew the facts, but they didn't release those facts because they if they had released them, the people wouldn't And they can come out tomorrow and tell me there's gonna be an epidemic and they can drop off like flies to me, I will not take another shot that my government It tells me to take.
Speaker 0: Meantime, Judy Roberts and some 4,000 others like her are still waiting for their day in court.
Speaker 7: I don't need another flu shot. I had a flu shot last year. A swine flu epidemic may be coming.
Speaker 10: Swine flu shot? Well, I don't know. Oh, I've been thinking about it.
Speaker 7: It could make you very sick.
Speaker 1: Swine flu. Man, I'm too fast today
Speaker 7: to catch me. You'll want to be protected.
Speaker 0: I'm the healthiest 55 year old you ever seen. Hey. I play golf every weekend.
Speaker 7: Get a shot of protection. The swine flu shot.
Speaker 10: Joe brought it home from the office. He gave it to Betty and one of his kids and to Betty's mother. But Betty's mother went back to California the next day. On her way to the airport, she gave it to a cab driver, A trip in one of the charming stewardesses. At school, Joe's kid gave it to some other kids, And missus Merrill got it and gave it to her husband.
In California, Betty's mother gave it to her best friend, Dottie. But Dottie had a heart condition when she died. But before she died, Dottie gave it to her girlfriend, the male man, the paperboy, And the vet when she went to pick up the 2 hour.
Speaker 7: If a swine flu epidemic comes, this is how it could spread. You want to be Active, especially if you're elderly or chronically ill. Get a shot of protection. The swine
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
@TuckerCarlson Remember this? https://t.co/z769ZhDMQ0
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: America's future requires everyone's participation. We are fortunate to have people like George Soros who fearlessly step up when it matters. Please welcome George Soros. It's the first time I feel compelled to get involved in the electoral process in this country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Not enough for America's future that some participate and others don't. We have been given an extraordinary blessing and at this moment in time, Our country needs us, and we need people like George Soros who is fearless and willing to step up when it counts. So please join me in welcoming George Soros. It is the first time that I feel that I need to stand up And to do something really, and become really engaged, in the The electoral process in in this country
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Naomi Wolf reveals eye-opening information from Pfizer's internal documents at The Summit For Truth. She also sheds light on the unrestricted warfare tactics employed by the CCP, WEF, and WHO. Their strategies include acquiring ports, water supplies, farmland, influencing presidents and agencies, dividing societies, funding propaganda, and demoralizing populations. Watch the powerful speech for a comprehensive understanding. Share widely.
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Must Watch: Dr. Naomi Wolf Exposes Pfizer Documents & Explains The ‘Why’ Behind COVID Vaccines: What We Can Do Moving Forward: (10/21/23): @naomirwolf delivers a powerful speech at The Summit For Truth, explaining what has been found in Pfizer’s OWN documents. On top of that, she explains what unrestricted warfare by the CCP, WEF, and WHO looks like: “Buying up our ports, buying up our water supplies, buying up our farmland, buying up our president, buying up our agencies, influencing our universities, creating division & confusion, funding propaganda, demoralizing us.” It is a longer clip, so consider playing it on 1.25X speed or bookmarking it for later if you’re short on time. Please share.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the dangers and adverse effects of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, highlighting the accumulation of lipid nanoparticles in various organs, including the ovaries, liver, spleen, adrenals, and brain. They also mention the occurrence of heart damage in teenagers and the high number of adverse events reported. The speaker suggests that the vaccine is part of a larger agenda to attack fertility and control the population. They believe that dark forces are at play, possibly linked to China, and that humanity is being tested. They emphasize the need to rebuild institutions and reclaim values to create a better future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are literally standing. It's like that moment. I'm Jewish, and I'm the, you know, granddaughter, as I often say, of a woman who lost 9 siblings to the holocaust. We're we're at that moment where the liberating forces opened the gates of Auschwitz, and and we're witnessing, you know, stacks of bodies. And we're witnessing a global crime unlike any crime in human history ever in scale and in evilness.
So In the headlines that these experts immediately began to break, I mentioned 12 25 deaths just in the those 3 months that the Pfizer documents cover. Here's one. Doctor Robert Chandler, was the lead author on this. And he's a sports medicine physician who has treated the Angels and the Lakers, very distinguished. He found And he confirmed something that Bret Weinstein had found, and I think maybe doctor Malone had been in this podcast to a year ago, that You were told that the materials, the lipid nanoparticles, the mRNA, and the spike protein stay in the deltoid, but they don't.
Pfizer knew that within 48 hours, they biodistribute to every organ in the human body, and they accumulate in the ovaries, the liver, the spleen, the adrenals, and the brain. And so doctor Chandler showed that the chart showing the materials leaving the deltoid went down like this, and the accumulation went up like that. And that's the 1st injection. Our volunteers have found no mechanism whereby these materials leave the body. So you have the 1st injection, the 2nd injection, The 3rd injection, my husband, who's a PI, legally found a CDC form that, like in 2021, which has space for 6 injections.
That's what was planned. And some countries are up to the 4th 5th injection. So if you're a woman, those lipid nanoparticles, which are an industrial fat covered in polyethylene glycol, which is a petroleum product, are accumulating in your ovaries with the 1st injection, more with the 2nd, more with the 1st booster. And independent midwives and nurses are telling us, as I mentioned, that when women are getting abdominal surgery now their fallopian tubes are blocked. So Doctor Flowers, in one of the first reports, found that even though we were not told this, The FDA and Pfizer knew by May of 2021 that the injections caused heart damage to teenagers.
And there was a paper that showed that there were 35 minors who sustained myocarditis or heart damage within a week after receiving the injection. But this was not a key, a cue for the administration to stop everything and hold a press conference and say, we're so sorry. Kids' hearts are being damaged, they doubled down as you'll see. They did not tell us. In fact, what followed was a huge propaganda campaign that whole summer aimed at teenagers and young adults.
If you will recall, the, you know, the the little stars going to visit the White House to talk about getting vaccinated. By November, they found, as I mentioned this morning, that the injections were not effective in stopping COVID. And in fact, the language in the Pfizer documents is failure of efficacy or vaccine failure. So everything that followed, All the closed businesses, all the careers ruined, all the health ruined, all the deaths, all the disabilities were based on a lie starting in November of 2020. It didn't work from the start and they knew it for the purpose that justified its rollout.
In the Pfizer documents, there are masses of adverse events. There are almost 43,000 adverse events, and they're not what you were told. If you went to the CDC website to look at side effects, it said, you know, fever, a little pain at the injection site, you might feel Tighe. That's not what Pfizer knew would happen. In the Pfizer documents, there there are catastrophic numbers of Well, interestingly, number 1 is joint pain.
How many people do you know with arthritis type pain subsequent to the injection? Replacements of shoulders, replacements of hips and knees, people limping who never used to. I know so many, many of them healthy young people. The the large, large categories like industrial scale are neurological, dementias, Alzheimer's, gambare, strokes, Bell's palsy. And the other largest tranche has to do with, blood clots, lung clots, leg clots, thrombotic thrombocytopenia, damage to blood.
And now we know the mechanisms due to the people sitting here and their colleagues. They were some of the first to find the mechanisms for how these shots were damaging hearts and damaging blood and circulation itself and damaging the neurological system. So many smoking guns were found by this team that should have been front page news all over the world. For instance, one could argue one could fact check me by saying, well, there's no cause and effect. You know, causation correlation does not equal causation.
But in the Pfizer documents, there are reports on strokes and liver damage, and half of the adverse events serious adverse events took place within 48 hours after the subject received the injection. Just a coincidence. Exactly right. I could go on, but I won't because it's too sad and horrible. I'll tell you that, Ed Dowd's research is so interesting because it independently from a separate database confirms what our researchers are finding from a separate database.
And in journalism, that's confirmation. When 2 people find the same thing working from 2 different perspectives, that's called confirmed in journalism. So, what Ed Dowd has reported most recently is that a 1000000 Americans self identified as disabled in the month of August 2023 alone. And what you need to know about the Pfizer documents is that and this This also is confirmed by Ed Dowd's separate research. 62% of the adverse events are are women.
Of those, 16% in Pfizer's own words are, quote, reproductive disorders. And in almost every organ system, which is something I don't even understand, you know, liver and neurological and stroke, it's women who disproportionately suffer the adverse events. So this is really a war on women as well as a war on humanity. I'm going to skip ahead over other horrors that some of which you heard about this morning, to what I think is the centerpiece of what they're doing, which is, as I mentioned, this attack on fertility. And it's it's it's holistic.
It's like every single thing that is involved in a man and a woman of the human species, mating, and a woman gestating and successfully delivering a baby and successfully nursing the baby get destroyed intentionally. I mean, I have to conclude it's intentional in the Pfizer documents because of the nature of the structure of the research, and I'll explain. I mentioned the lipid nanoparticles in the ovaries. So I also mentioned that they traversed the placenta, and really a mystery to me since scientists have known and you can look it up and find these papers going back 8 or 10 years. It's been known for 10 years that lipid nanoparticles traverse every organ in the human body.
Every organ every barrier God made. Right? And there's actually a prayer in the Hebrew tradition, the Jewish tradition, thanking God for, like, making membranes in the body so that it isn't chaos. Right? So you can live.
But every Every barrier that God created in the human body is breached and disrupted by lipid nanoparticles. Doctor Chandler said it's like a shotgun blast to the body. So, of course, it traverses the placenta, and doctor Jim Thorpe, a fetal maternal medicine specialist who has been fired and, like, publicly, you know, reputationally denounced by his institution for his honesty and his concern for his patients and their babies, he showed sonograms of impaired placentas, and it's like a netting of calcifications. And then I'm a journalist, so one is not enough. Right?
So I solicited other people who deliver babies to see if this is really happening. And 2 independent midwives, one in Sacramento and one in Northern California, have confirmed that they're seeing these calcified placentas that prevent the baby from getting enough nutrients and oxygen, and that these placentas fall apart when the mom gives birth and that the moms are induced, like, months early because the the placentas can't grow enough. And 1 1 midwife actually sent me a picture of these flattened, shrunken placentas that vaccinated women now have. It's absolutely catastrophic. But not only do they degrade the Most sacred space on the planet, which is where the baby develops in utero.
But Amy Kelly, our incredible COO, otherwise known as the amazing Amy Kelly, who leads the teams, found that the lipid nanoparticles degraded the testes, as I mentioned this morning, in baby boys in utero. And so this degrades the Sertoli cells and the Leydig cells, and I didn't know about this. I learned a lot about what makes Men men and what makes women women in this process, but the Sertoli cells and the Leydig cells switch on. They're like the factories of masculinity. They switch on adult manhood at puberty, and, help to create, like, deep voices, broad shoulders, Your hair on the chest, the ability to father a child, the things that we associate with adult masculinity.
So we don't even know if these little boys in utero are going to grow up to be normal men who can father children. There's a section in the Pfizer documents where there's an 80% miscarriage rate. I was fact checked for the initial draft of that, of that report, which found 44%. And AP ran a story, and all these fact checkers ran a story saying, Naomi's wrong. It's not 44%.
That's right. It's 80%. They didn't retract their fact checking, by the way, and update the numbers. And not only that, but women were told not to get pregnant in the Pfizer trials, but 270 got pregnant anyway. So Pfizer managed to lose the records of 234 of them, which is illegal.
Right? So we don't even know. That could have been even worse. They all the babies could have died for all we know, or the moms could have died. We don't know.
But of the 36 women whose record survived till they gave birth or till the end of their pregnancies, over 80% of them lost their babies. You weren't told that. You weren't told that. Shedding is real. Pfizer officials warn vaccinated men in their studies not to have intercourse with unvaccinated women of childbearing age, and if they do so, to use 2 reliable forms of contraception.
So there's something in the semen of vaccinated men, and this may be something for doctor Cole to look at, which is which Pfizer seems to think is injurious either to the woman or to the embryo. It's unclear from the context what their concern is, but they're concerned about it. They also define exposure to the vaccine as including skin contact and inhalation. Again, there's not that much clarity about that, but it's like they're not saying you can't be exposed to it in other ways. In fact, there are multiple ways they define exposure other than through an injection in your body.
We know from the journal Andrology that the injections depress sperm count and motility. The Pfizer documents show that lipid nanoparticles, as I mentioned this morning, get into and so does the, polyethylene glycol, gets into mom's breast milk. And so babies are ingesting these materials, tiny babies, their only food is is mixed with a petroleum byproduct. By the way, polyethylene glycol is an antifreeze. So, Unsurprisingly, babies are getting sick, that nursing from vaccinated moms.
And There's this section in the Pleasure documents where 4 women have who are nursing have blue green breast milk. I like Chamber of Horrors. And this 1 poor baby who nurses from a vaccinated mom goes into convulsions, is rushed to the ER, and dies of multi organ system failure. During the last 2 or 3 years, breastfeeding has gone from 34% of new moms to 14%. I think clearly because babies are getting poisoned milk.
And this is really bad for the human race because, there's this hormonal feedback loop when moms breastfeed their babies, which also involves bonding. The baby nursing releases dopamine for the mom. And that's part of the bonding process, and the baby also bonds through nursing. And so now babies are have I've written this essay about how babies don't look very be anymore. You know?
And it's not just this. It's like the masking and the weirdness, but their this fundamental human bonding and mirroring and connection is being disrupted because babies are not experiencing the first food of their lives as nurturing and comforting, but as poisonous. And we're going to see the effects of this in the next generation psychologically, I'm quite sure, if not also physically. Note That Abbott, which manufactures baby formula, was taken offline by whom? Remember?
The FDA. So they were forcing vaccinated moms to breastfeed their babies poisoned milk. So I'm going to skip ahead. There's another section in the Pfizer documents. Oh, this is very disturbing.
In the Pfizer documents, I mentioned the menstrual dysregulation. There's a chart. And to me as a Jewish woman, The the kind of clinical detachment with which the Pfizer scientists, like, list horrible things they're doing to people without their consent and to babies is very reminiscent of Nazi science. And anyone who wants to call me a Semite, this this an anti Semite, this Jewish lady, you know, come get me because this is Nazi science and I will stand forever in memory of my ancestors and I'll say it. So they Create this chart that shows, like, every cell, every line has, like, 15,000 women bleeding every day.
10,000 women, 2 periods a month. You know, 13,000 women, no periods at all, meaning no babies, no fertility at all. You know, 6,000 women, agonizing cramps. 45 100 women passing tissue and hemorrhaging. You know, it goes on and on and on.
Horrible things that are being done to women. So it turns out that my warning in 2021 was right and we're suing Twitter. Thank you. But but more importantly, even while now legacy media is running mealy mouthed stories saying, well, Studies are showing you might have some menstrual changes with the mRNA injection. They really downplay it.
In fact, in the Pfizer documents of just talking to women, you see that these some of these are disabling conditions. And I'm quite you can't if you're passing tissue or hemorrhaging or having agonizing cramps, You can't be a good soldier or pilot or scientist or mom or, you know, worker of any kind. You can't have a life. And and so the it is it it's not just a chart of menstrual irregularity, it's a chart of wholesale damage to lives through kind of deconstructing the uterus, it seems to be what they've done, like deconstructing what what keeps women whole and hormonally, like, healthy. It's very distressing.
So I'm gonna fast forward. There's a section in the Pfizer documents. It's this 8 page pregnancy and lactation report. I mentioned it this morning. And this showed that 2 babies in utero had died due to, quote, quote, maternal exposure to the vaccine.
Quote, Maternal exposure to the vaccine, meaning Pfizer knew that's what killed the babies. This also has a chart showing again, one of those charts showing all these babies sick from nursing their vaccinated moms. This many babies have fever. This many babies are vomiting. This many babies have tissue swelling, edema.
You know, the this many babies are inconsolable. Again, Nazi science, but this time directed at tiny babies. They're observing what happens when they poison the babies without telling the moms. And they turn in this report on April 20, 21. They turn in this report.
To whom do they turn it in? They turn it into the FDA, which means the CDC has it, which means the White House has it. I'll tell you how I know that in a minute. What happens on April 23, 2021? Doctor Rochelle Walensky holds a White House press conference and announces that if you're pregnant she has this document.
She says if you're pregnant, you should get an mRNA vaccine, that there is never a bad time to get vaccinated before you have a baby, while you're pregnant, or after you've had a baby. That's what she tells the pregnant women of America or the women of America who are planning to get pregnant. Evil monsters. Monsters. Nuremberg 2.0.
I'll end with how I know that all those evildoers saw that document and acted on it in that way. Some of the most recent bombshells from our team have to do with a FOIA, meaning a Freedom of Information Act request by an attorney of ours, Ed Berkovich. And the amazing Amy Kelly by the way, her birthday is tomorrow. The amazing Amy Kelly has gone through these hundreds of pages of FOIA ed emails, heavily redacted. And I just want to, like, mention that part of the reason these people and the 3,200, they are not sitting here and Amy Kelly are so extraordinary extraordinarily heroic is that the labor the nature of the labor they do is so exhausting and detailed and, arduous.
You know? And and and And they're literally it's literally a labor of love for humanity. So this is one of those tasks where Amy Kelly went through hundreds and hundreds of pages and lifted out what's German. Well, it turns out that, the White House communications team. And I I know what I'm looking at as a former adviser to president Clinton's reelection campaign and a former adviser to the vice president.
I know What the White House communications team is, my my then husband was was a speechwriter for the White House in the Clinton era, and I know what I'm looking at. So the White House communications team is driving this response in May of 2021 to reports of blood clots and heart damage reaching the CDC, doctor Walensky, doctor Fauci, the president, the White House, all these evildoers, doctor Collins. They're all cc'd, right? And instead of instead of coming clean with us and saying there's blood clots, there's there's Thrombotic thrombocytopenia, there's myocarditis. We have to stop.
What you see is a script, the White House's words. There are 15 White House staffers driving this effort. They're all named. And then you see, a 100% redacted 17 slides of the script. And that script is what all these people stayed on downplaying myocarditis and, to my knowledge, not even mentioning blood clots for all of 2021.
And you remember what they said about myocarditis in 2021. It's transient. It's mild. It resolves. No big deal.
Well, the 2nd tranche that Amy went through and just posted about showed that the American Association of Pediatricians had warned them, as I said this morning, that it's not mild and it doesn't necessarily resolve and that a whole family needs to work with doctors to make sure that teenager stays alive if they have myocarditis. Well, well, all these people and by the way, it's driven by doctor Rachel Levine, which is interesting. She seems to be the boss of the whole thing. So it seems like doctor Walensky is her junior in this effort and kind of just a front person. But doctor Fauci is cc'd, doctor Collins is cc'd, and there's a template for POTUS to surface the key insights for POTUS.
And you know who POTUS is, president of the United States. So our president knew in May of 2021 that teenagers' hearts were being damaged and that people were suffering Debilitating, if not fatal, blood clots. And what did they do? While they're talking about teens' hearts being damaged, Doctor Walensky takes the time to email a colleague who'd mentioned doctor Paul Offit joining the effort to her, And she said, well, I don't know him personally, but I'm a big admirer and fan blushy face emoticon. So on your taxpayer dollars, doctor Walensky was taking the time to be flirty while they're talking about kids being injured almost to death.
Monsters. So what happened later on in 2021? Mandates. And whom did they mandate? They mandated the people you need to keep a nation alive.
They mandated the soldiers. They mandated the sailors. They mandated the special forces, the pharmacists, the nurses, the doctors. They mandated the college students, our next generation. They mandated the school children in some states, the the people who will be the next Americans.
And now we're seeing The catastrophic outcome of that which they knew would happen, and we're seeing predictably A 13 to 20% drop in live births, especially in the west. A 1000000 babies missing in Western Europe. And we're seeing, catastrophic collapse of human reproduction in the West. So the last thing I want to say to you about this, and then I'm gonna turn to kind of a more hopeful, way forward is, like, a a huge question you must be asking by now is why? Why would our own administration laughingly, jokingly roll out something so dangerous and deadly that sterilizes their own people.
And this is a piece of information I really think you need to have to add to the picture that you have from all of today about the medical harms. My independent research found that when you get a Pfizer injection, I haven't had the chance to look at Moderna, But when you get a Pfizer injection, you're not getting an injection from a German company or a German American company. And BioNTech is the subsidiary of Pfizer that makes this injection. You're getting an injection composed and distributed by our existential adversary, Because BioNTech entered into an MOU, which is a memorandum of understanding, with Fosun Pharmaceuticals, which is the a gigantic, Chinese communist pharmaceutical company in China run by senior officials of the Chinese Communist Party. Not only that, they produced in this MOU a 1000000000 doses, but they were not for use in China.
People in China are not given these injections. They are for export. China also opened 14 manufacturing plants in 2021 in Western Europe and 2 in the United States, 1 in Andover, Massachusetts and 1 in Princeton, New Jersey. In 2021, BioNTech's SEC filing for the company showed as and I'm a tech CEO. So again, I understand what I'm looking at.
Showed as a 100% completed a tech transfer from BioNTech to China. The SEC filing, you can look at it for yourself. It doesn't say to a Chinese individual. It doesn't say to a Chinese company. It says to China.
Those are the words. And what is IP? What is tech? It could mean anything from formulation to methodology of composition to manufacturing processes. But it means that literally what is in the vial now, and you've heard that Kevin McKernan found that what's in the vial is fragments of DNA and horrible contaminants.
Right? The people who produced distributed that got it into your arm are China. Then these are people who, organ harvest their own citizens, who sauder their own citizens into their homes, you know, under the pretext of COVID, who put their own, Uighur minorities into concentration camps, who force abortions on women, as you know. And as my husband pointing pointed out, and he spent his career in military intelligence and in Intelligence community, he said he said at the very early stage of this, this is China in, like, February of 2020. And I said, honey, I love you, but that's crazy.
You know. And then he showed me so much primary documentation that I'm I'm now a 1000% persuaded. He explained to me how unrestricted warfare works, which is the Chinese, you know, ancient methodology of going to war, not like Westerners experience war. It's not bombs dropping or armies invading, it's buying up our ports, buying up our water supplies, buying up our farmland, buying up our president, buying up our agencies, you know, influencing our universities, creating, as doctor Malone pointed out, division, confusion, funding propaganda, right, demoralizing us. So why would they not make war on the Other superpower they want to get rid of via, you know, appropriating the pharmaceutical system.
It's genius. It you know, it's absolute genius, and that's what's happening. War is being waged on us by China and their allies, the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization. And as Brian, my husband put it, they want our land, they want our water, they want our energy supplies, They want our grid. They want our natural resources.
They want our farmland. They don't want our population. And combine this again, I'm a daughter and granddaughter of immigrants. I believe in it legal immigration, but combine this with a thoroughly open border where millions of people are flowing in who don't know what democracy is from the countries that many of them come from. And as Ed Dowd said, just wait 5 years.
And those of us who remember what the constitution is, many will be sick or dead. And there's a new a new reality in which America can be a thing of the past as a beacon of liberty because no one will remember what the constitution is anymore. It'll be a thoroughly altered landscape. So and the other last piece of evidence I have that this is war and that this injection is a bioweapon, has to do with the distribution of adverse events. So there are 30 there are 42,000 plus adverse events as I mentioned in the Pfizer documents.
That's just 3 months. 36,000 of them are in North America, especially the United States. 7,000 of them are from Western Europe in order of political importance. So Britain, Germany, France, Greece, Italy, Spain. And all the rest of the adverse events combined come from the rest of the 132 countries where this was rolled out.
So that's not rampant distribution. And it's very easy to make this injection more or less lethal by doing simple things such as changing the brand with Moderna more than 3 times more lethal than Pfizer because Moderna has 100 micrograms of the key ingredients and Pfizer has 30 for an adult dose or or things like playing with temperature. And so this is very terrifying to me, and it's it's also a signal to me that this is a bioweapon. And I guess what I would just say is history and now I'll move to the happy part because this is very crucially awful and unbearable. I guess I'll just say, like, history is so, deceptive in a way because people, if they've never seen something happen before in their lifetime, they think it has never happened, Right?
So we've never seen another superpower poison a superpower through pharmaceuticals, But that doesn't mean that bioweapons haven't been part of human history for as long as there's been records of war, whether it's throwing diseased corpses of animals by catapult into the walls of walled cities in biblical times or in the middle ages to, you know, smallpox in blankets recorded in the 18th century in journals on in North America. So this is happening, and I guess we need to wake up. Alright. Now I'm gonna this is so horrible. Are you still with me for the kind of hopeful part?
Alright. Thank you. Thank you. So, like this is my life and Amy Kelly's life and the volunteers' lives. Like, Just when you think it can't be more grotesque and horrific, you find another one of these things.
And this is very existentially traumatizing. Right? And we're not done yet. They're not done yet. There's more.
So these these people are literally standing at the gates. You know, I I think of, is it Saint Michael with a dragon and the sword, you know, they're literally standing at the gates of of where humanity lives and facing this dragon every single day. And, you know, I do my small part, kind of standing by to transcribe their battles with the dragon. It's very painful. And you have to and I don't know about you guys, but I ask and I don't know if Amy asks because she seems superhuman, but I ask, like, why are we going through this?
How how can this be? How can like, how can we have been forsaken like this? You know, how could What's happening? Right? None of it makes sense.
Well, I study history very carefully, and I study the history of totalitarianism very carefully. I wrote a book in 2008 predicting all of this called The End of America. Not this part of this, but predicting the fact that America could lose its democracy very easily because of how other fragile democracies have collapsed in the past. And What struck me, what I couldn't figure out, was why what was happening around the world from 2020 on was not like any human history I've ever seen or learned about in any book at any time in my lifetime. Nothing ever.
Here's what I mean. It was all in lockstep. Every leader said exactly the same things in exactly the same way, at exactly the same time they rolled out the stupid policies in exactly the same sequence. And there was no normal human history, there's infighting, there's treachery, there are factions, people make mistakes, You know, they're rich people who just for whatever reason don't go along with things because they don't need the money you're bribing them with or whatever. None of that was happening.
And bringing us back to the beginning of my talk, I've also never seen whole groups of people in a state of delusion that's fixed. And doctor Malone mentioned this a little bit, and there's been a lot of work done on how people go into hysteria, basically, historically. But I I'd never seen anything like this. And so I came reluctantly to the conclusion that we're not in human history anymore, That we've entered kind of and I agree with what the Shannon Joyce term we've entered kind of a biblical time in which history is not behaving normally. And I believe that we I like I'm a deep rationalist, classically trained, believed in the enlightenment, critical tradition.
So we don't usually talk about God and metaphysical forces in my old world certainly, but I think we have to talk about god and metaphysical forces now or we will not survive. So I've come to believe that a I've come to believe that a a a an evil force that is bigger and more impressive and more gargantuan and scary than anything we could ever imagine. I think bigger than Satan, but that's another conversation. Because, like, Satan's in opposition to God, but this is like, I don't even care about God. I don't care about humanity.
It's this dark, dark, dark intelligence that was suddenly unleashed on the whole world. I think that's here. I don't fully know what it is. I've written an essay called Have the Ancient Gods Returned, because it kind of reminds me more of, you know, Amalek or or, Baal, you know, and, doctor Rabbi Jonathan Khan or minister Jonathan Khan writes about this as well. But, like, whoever they are, they're dark forces we haven't seen in our lifetime.
Right? Maybe we had a glimpse of them with Nazism, but they're creepy and occult and metaphysical, and they love death, and they want death, and they're turning they're turning all of our institutions into a mirror of what they used to be. Hospitals used to support life, now they're engineering death. Euthanasia used to be not a thing. Now it's a program in Canada with you know, ads aimed at depressed teenagers.
Even pro choice people like me, reluctantly, 1st trimester, I am Another conversation, would never in the past have been on board with bills that are are real that I've seen that have passed in Maryland and Washington state that make it basically fine to neglect a newborn baby for a month to death to death. Right? So, Like all of our Judeo Christian values, even if we don't believe in a Judeo Christian God, our West till 2020 still had the imprint of Judeo Christian values in our institutions. If you go to court, you don't expect the person to win who bribes the judge. You know, you expect impartial justice.
In the orphanage, they're not trafficking the kids. They're trying to find homes for them. Right? Those are Judeo Christian values that that shaped our institutions even though we thought our institutions were secular. Well, it feels like, To me it feels like God has, kind of, said you wanna do it yourself?
This is what it looks like. And just stepped back and allowed this in rushing of not as punishment, but as some kind of balancing or cleansing or test or shaking us out of our complacency, allowed this to happen. So where I'm going with that, I was very struck in my struggle with this time and these Questions with a quote from the late Doctor. Zelenko, who was an Orthodox Jew, and he And he said that that we're humanity is going through a time that is a test for humanity. And that makes sense to me.
I don't think it's a punishment like we've been bad, though we have clearly been bad. I think it's some kind of karma. I think it's I think it's a mirror being held up to us. You know? You you didn't cherish life.
This is what it looks like when you don't cherish life. Your kids die. You know, you didn't prioritize your family. This is what it looks like when you let your family go. You're all isolated in rooms and have lost the ability to be close to each other.
You know, you didn't talk to me. You didn't worship me. Well, I I, you know, I let people close the churches and synagogues. Let's see who speaks up against it. Nobody except for, like, 2 ministers, probably you guys and, like, 1 orthodox Jew, like, You know, like like everyone walked away from god in the last few years.
No one, almost no one said, we're not closing our church. We're not closing our synagogue. And the people who did got arrested are fined. I spoke at one of their churches in California, but was there did God's people say no? You know, my I can't I can't enter the synagogue that my mother belongs to because I'm not vaccinated to this day to to say Yahrzeit for my deceased father.
I can't walk in the door. Okay? Is this God's, like, direction in any of these religions? No. So it is a test.
It's a time of testing, and and and it's a time of deconstruction and reconstruction. So I'll just end by saying we're we're witnessing our institutions collapsing or they've already collapsed. Right? The media, the churches, the synagogues, the universities, you know, they're all corrupt corrupt government. Corrupt corrupt all the way down.
Hospitals, the medical system. So we're either going to revert to barbarism or or we're going to do what you all are doing here and say, okay, it's just us now, let's start anew. Let's start a new clinic. Let's start a new school system even if it's just 4 neighbors homeschooling, you know, or shaming their Their local school board, let's start a new fellowship. Let's worship wherever We worship, maybe labels don't matter so much anymore.
Let's just find godly people and work with them and fellowship with them. And let's reclaim our constitution. Let's Let's defend and protect our constitution, whoever we are, wherever we come from. That's our job. So that's where we are.
And when I hear you and and listen to this and feel this, I feel that there is hope, but that we need, you know, we need to be those embers of hope in the darkness, it's gonna light a whole new set of lamps and candles and fires and and be part of building a new civilization, which which is better and cleaner and kinder and more compassionate and really more aligned with with God's grace than what we've allowed to happen. So I will end with 2 Chronicles 714, which is a quote I think about a lot because I cling to it when I'm praying for all my loved ones who have received this horrific injection. If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves and pray and seek my face in turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and will heal their land. Thank you so much.
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Reminder: Klaus Schwab Brags About Penetrating Governments: Who Voted For This? “We penetrate the cabinets.” Klaus Schwab in 2017 bragging how the WEF penetrates governments with its Young Global Leaders & affiliates. People should continue calling this insanity out. https://t.co/XiXsfLsQRk
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am proud of the young generation, like Prime Minister Trudeau and the President of Argentina, who are making a difference. I attended a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau and learned that many members of his cabinet are young leaders in the world economy. This is also true in Argentina and France.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What we are very proud of now is the young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, President of Argentina and so on. So if he penetrates the cabinets, so yesterday, I was at the reception or Prime Minister Trudeau. And I would know that half of this cabinet or even more half of this cabinet are for our actually young noble leaders of the world economy. And that's true in Argentina too. Wow, sorry.
That's true in Argentina as well. It's still in Argentina and, it's still in France.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Flexner Report, a century-old documentation, sheds light on how the medical industry and pharmaceutical companies gained control. They prioritize profit over patient well-being, discrediting affordable and safe alternatives. The centralized medical system, influenced by materialism and medication, restricts the establishment of independent medical schools. Small schools were closed or merged with universities backed by industrial companies. Understanding this history is crucial to comprehending the current system. Watch the video for more details.
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Watch: Did You Know? Flexner Report: How Rockefeller & Carnegie Gained Total Control Of The Medical Industry: "Despite the huge amount of money accumulated in the pharma industry, there are more dreadful diseases & sick people today than ever.” After over 100 years, we must ask the question: What went wrong? You will find the answers in the Flexner Report, a documentation that created and enabled the terms of a centralized medical system and pharma industry to take over control. The pharmaceutical industry and medical system is set up to ensure you're a repeat customer and come back for their products. They work hard to discredit cheap/safe alternatives as it would not benefit their business model. It could be argued that the medical system is the leading cause of death when you consider how we treat other top diseases. According to the present-day consequences of the report, no medical school can be created without the permission of government, and medical research adheres fully to the protocols of scientific research (of the 1910s - materialism, medication and vaccination). Small medical schools were either closed or merged into universities financially supported by industrial companies. It’s important to understand the history of the current system. This is a longer clip, so consider playing it on 1.25X speed or bookmark it for later if you’re short on time.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1907, the American Medical Association involved the Carnegie Foundation to study medical education in the US and Canada. The report, known as the Carnegie Foundation bulletin number 4, was authored by Abraham Flexner, who was not a physician but had ties to the Rockefeller Institute. The report aimed to improve medical service by establishing education based on scientific principles. It promoted materialism, the belief that everything is composed of matter. The report led to the closure of many alternative medicine schools and the consolidation of medical schools. Today, the consequences of the report include government control over medical schools and adherence to scientific protocols. However, there are concerns about the high number of deaths due to medical mistakes and the increasing prevalence of diseases. The Flexner report is seen as the catalyst for the centralized medical system and pharmaceutical industry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1907, the AMA, American Medical Association, involved the Carnegie Foundation in elaborating a book length study of medical education in the United States and Canada, also known as the Carnegie Foundation bulletin number 4. The author, Abraham Flexner, was an ambitious educator. Neither a physician neuromedical scientist, but the brother of Simon Flexner, employed by the Rockefeller Institute For Medical Research. Later on, Abraham Flexner became the 1st director of the Rockefeller Philanthropy Programs in Medical Education. Andrew Carnegie was regarded as the as the 2nd richest man in history after John d Rockefeller.
While Carnegie played a leading role in the American steel industry in education, Rockefeller was interested in oil industry and medical research. Abraham Flexner's report was published in 1910, and the purpose was to improve the quality of medical service by establishing professional medical education based on mainstream scientific principles. But what was accepted as science in the early 20th century. The theory of materialism rising in the 17th century holds that the only existing thing is matter. Everything is composed of material and all phenomena including consciousness, human soul, and spirit are the results of material interactions.
Actions. In other words, matter is the only substance. Scientific materialism, physicalism became the philosophical position of the early 20th century. The main statement of physicalism is that there are no kinds of things other than physical things. When a hypothesis is repeated long enough, it often becomes a fundamental rule of life.
It is assumed to be true. Before the Fleckson report was released, twice as many physicians practiced alternative medicine than conventional allopathic medicine. And knowledge was taught in small private schools all over the USA. This report changed everything. And backed by the police power of each American state.
Medical schools were obliged to follow the trend set by the Carnegie Foundation. The human body belongs to the animal world. It is put together of tissues and organs. It grows, reproduces itself, decays according to general laws. It is liable to attack hostile physical and biological agencies.
Herbs, homeopathy, chiropractic and massage were demoted as quackery. Small medical schools were either closed or merged into universities financially ly supported by industrial companies. In less than 10 years, the number of medical schools dropped from 650 to 50. The number of medical students decreased from 7,500 to 2,500 as they were unable to afford the high education fees. The report included a detailed regulation of medical education and pharmacology as the only solution against dreadful diseases.
According to the present day consequences of the report, no medical school can be created without the permission of government, and medical research adheres fully to the protocols of scientific Research. Of the 19 tens, materialism, medication, and vaccination. Supply of physicians were restricted incomes of the remaining practitioners raised and conventional medical schools began to be centralized. In 1997, the WHO obtained full control of the medicine as the validity of the Flexner Report was extended worldwide. And what was the long term Alta performing the medical education and practice.
Hardly any news in the media. According to the 2003 medical report, death by medicine, 780 3,000 to 936 people in the United States die every year for conventional medical mistakes. This is 16,400% of the victims of September 11, 2001, equivalent of 6 jumbo jet crashes a day for an entire year. A 106,000 of the nearly 800,000 cases are from prescription drugs. The United States spends $282,000,000,000 annually on deaths due to medical mistakes or iatrogenic deaths.
According to a 1995 US iatrogenic report, the annual automobile accident mortality rate 45,000. On the other hand, annually, over a 1000000 patients get injured in hospitals. And 280,000 of these cases result in death. In 2004, the USA spent $1,400,000,000,000, fifteen point 5% of the GDP on health care. More than 1 third was paid to the pharmaceutical industry.
After 100 years, we must raise the question, what went wrong? Despite the huge amount of money accumulated in the pharmaceutical industry, there are more dreadful diseases and sick people today than ever. You will find the answers in the Flexner report, a documentation that created and enabled the terms of a centralized medical system and pharma industry to take over control.
reSee.it AI Summary
Propaganda media manufactures consent for wars by distorting truth, oversimplifying issues, and demonizing targets. Conflict benefits those who fund both sides, not the people. Mainstream media sets boundaries and frames narratives, as seen with COVID-19. Populations must be fooled into wars. Question information presented. Watch the documentary "All Wars Are Bankers' Wars" for insight. Should we consider a world without mainstream media?
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Watch: Critical Thought: Populations Don’t Like Wars: They Must Be Fooled Into Them: Who Really Benefits? With ongoing war escalation, its important to consider how propaganda media manufactures consent for wars by telling half truths, deliberately leaving out context, oversimplification of an issue, dehumanizing the intended target, demonizing leaders/groups & constantly parroting state department propaganda slogans. Conflict is a tool for powers above it who fund both sides to advance broader agendas that are not for the benefit of the people. Globalists feed on division & hate. What you see from dying mainstream media sets boundaries and frames the narratives for society to blindly follow (think COVID-19). Populations don’t like wars. They have to be fooled into wars. Recognize that its the globalist groups/elitists vs. the people. People should question and think critically about the information presented to them. Recently, @Inversionism shared an important documentary that offers powerful insight on how “all wars are bankers’ wars”. I will link it below this post. This raises the question; would the world be a better place without the mainstream media altogether?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that media lies have been responsible for starting most wars in the past 50 years. They argue that if the media had dug deeper and not spread government propaganda, wars could have been prevented. The speaker suggests that populations are tricked into wars because they don't willingly enter them. They claim that a good media environment leads to peace, but ignorance is the main enemy. The organizations promoting ignorance are those that keep secrets and distort information. The speaker expresses their opinion that the media is generally so bad that the world might be better off without it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nearly every war that has started in the past 50 years has been a result of media lives the media could have stopped it if they had searched deep enough, they hadn't, reprinted government propaganda, they could have stopped it. But what does that in. Well, that means basically populations don't like wars, and populations have to being fooled into wars, populations don't willingly and with open eyes go into a war, so if we have a good media environment, then you also have a peaceful environment, but our number one enemy is ignorance. Now question is who is promoting ignorance well those organizations who try to keep them secret scrutiny, and those organizations which distort true information, connection, false, misrepresentation. In this latter category, it is bad news.
It really is my opinion the immediate, in general, are so bad, we we have to question whether the world wouldn't be better off without
reSee.it AI Summary
David Rockefeller's leaked 1991 speech at a Bilderberg meeting exposed his desire for a world government. He acknowledged the crucial role played by mainstream media in keeping their plans hidden. This revelation raises concerns about media's complicity with globalist elites who control these corporations. Should we consider a world without mainstream media? Follow alternative accounts for unbiased information. Spread awareness.
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
David Rockefeller Leaked 1991 Speech At Bilderberg Meeting: Pulling Strings To Implement A World Government: In 1991 at a Bilderberg meeting, David Rockefeller said that without the use of [MSM] media organizations, “It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward a world government.”. This quote is extremely revealing, as it proves that not only were he and others attending the meeting striving to create a one world government since well before 1991, but mainstream media (MSM) news outlets were aware of it and chose not to disclose this information to the public. It’s disturbing that MSM turned a blind eye to this; however, it’s not at all surprising given the fact that the globalist/elitist people attending these types of meetings are the very ones who fund & control these corporations. Would the world be a better place without these mainstream media organizations altogether? Share to spread awareness.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We appreciate the support of various publications like the Washington Post, The New York Times, and Time Magazine, whose directors have attended our meetings for almost 40 years. Their discretion has allowed us to develop our plan for a world government without interference. However, the world has become more sophisticated and ready to embrace this idea. Our goal is to establish a world system of financial control in private hands, enabling us to dominate the political and economic systems of every country. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) serves as our visible means to achieve this agenda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, and other publications whose directors have attended our meetings and restricted our policies of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the right by and publicity. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward the world government.
Speaker 1: It reveals that these men aim to create The world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. In short, they seek total and quiet control of the entire world. And the CFR is their most visible conduit for carrying out that agenda.
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Consider giving these accounts a follow for information the mainstream media won't cover.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a must-watch video, Michael Yon describes the coordinated invasion of the US through Darian Gap. He predicts a potential influx of one million migrants per month by 2025. With just two bridges, the flow could increase from 300,000 to 1,000,000 per month. Darian Gap is considered the major invasion route to the US, allowing easy access within a week or two from South America. This pressing issue cannot be ignored. Increase awareness by sharing this eye-opening video.
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Must Watch: Michael Yon Describes First-Hand The Coordinated Invasion Of the US: “The aliens used to stay in the camps sometimes for several days, even weeks. Now they usually just stay for several hours, maybe overnight.” “By 2025, I would not be surprised to see a million per month coming through Darian [Gap].” There’s a only a few tweaks needed to be made to allow for that capacity and those are two bridges. One of which, the US army could construct in one or two days. That’s all you need to increase the flow from approximately 300,000 per month to 1,000,000 per month, explains @Michael_Yon. It’s growing. If you have not been following what is happening at Darian Gap, listening to this video will provide an understanding for the scope of this major issue. It cannot be ignored. Darian Gap is said to be the major invasion route to the United States. If you can get your feet anywhere into South America, you can then get anywhere in the United States or Canada very easily within a week or two. It is a longer clip, so consider playing it on 1.25X speed or bookmarking it for later if you're short on time. Please share to increase awareness.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Panama, new camps are being built to accommodate the increasing number of migrants. One camp, already tripled in size, can hold up to 15,000 people. Currently, 3,000 to 5,000 migrants pass through daily, but this number is expected to triple. The organizational structure has become more efficient, with migrants staying in the camp for shorter periods, sometimes just a few hours. Those without money work in the camp to pay for a $60 bus ticket to leave Darien and cross the Costa Rican border. Two additional camps are being constructed, and it is predicted that by January, there could be 10,000 migrants per month, reaching 1,000,000 per month by 2025. The speaker emphasizes the importance of Darien Gap as a major invasion route to the United States.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Down here in Panama again, it just left the dirty gap. They're building new camps down there. One camp is big enough for 15,000 people. I sent you drone footage, that was from a few days ago, and we droned it about 2 weeks ago too. It's already tripled in size.
There's nobody in that camp yet, but it's it's still growing, and they're preparing it. Right now, we have 3 to 5000 coming through a day, and it's increasing. It's gonna at least triple. The president of Costa Rica and Panama were down here on October 6th and announced that they're increasing from 60 from roughly 60 buses a day to about 200. And now as the aliens come through, Darien Gap, used to be this system is becoming much more efficient.
Right? The organizational structure is streamlined. And for instance, now, the the the the aliens used to stay in the camp sometimes for several days, even a couple of weeks. Now they usually stay in for just several hours, maybe overnight. If the one the ones who don't have money, they'll keep them for about 5 days.
They'll let them work around the camp to pay for the bus ticket, which is now $60 to leave Darien on a bus, go up highway 1, and cross the Costa Rican border. They just agreed to this on October 6th, and they started it last Sunday. You can cross right into Costa Rica now without a passport and go straight up on the bus to the Nicaraguan border. This is very smooth now. Right?
It's smooth from Columbia into Panama, and it's smooth right on through Costa Rica now. Now they're building 2 new camps, not just the one for 15,000 people. There's another one that I haven't droned yet. I've been out in that area many, many times, but now they're starting a new camp. The Indians are out there with machetes cutting down these new camps.
Again, I would be surprised if you don't see, 10,000 a month by the end of January when dry season is here and the camp Sorry. Getting filled up. And, and by 2025, I would not be surprised at all to see a 1,000,000 a month coming through Darien. That's why I come let Let me say it again, a 1,000,000 a month. I would not be surprised.
There's only a few tweaks that you need to do to reach that level of, intensity. 1 is is just 2 bridges. Right? And one of those bridges is, is is it will be built this year, right, or in 2024. It will be built during the dry season.
They build the bridges during dry season, which will start in about January. So they'll build that bridge, and then there's another bridge that needs to be built and which the US army could build in 1 or 2 days, maybe a day, actually. So, I mean, these are not serious bridges, but that's all you need to increase the flow from, say, 300,000 a month to, a 1,000,000 a month. They can easily do it now. They can easily do 300,000 a month now with the current infrastructure.
That's no problem at all. Or they with these 2 new camps. So we're looking at an invasion. Again, the reason I come to Darien Gap so much, and I don't waste time going off to places like Ukraine distractions or the distraction of Israel. They're trying to suck us in.
Where are these aliens from Gaza gonna go? I already see people from Gaza coming through all the time. They tell me they're from Gaza. Right? Now you gotta keep in mind, Venezuela, most of the aliens coming through now are from Venezuela.
There are a lot of Hezbollah in Venezuela, and they speak Spanish fluently. Native Spanish, they've got Venezuelan body language. They come across right as Venezuelans. Right? And you you'll never know the difference.
And Peru as well. There's there's there's some Hamas down, South America. There's a lot of Hezbollah, and they're coming across through Darien Gap. That doesn't even include the include the Chinese. I mean, so this is a you know, we've got, you know, basically, Half of Haiti seems to have come through at this point.
Cuba as well. You know, people from at least a 140 countries, Ben and Ben Bergwam and Oscar Blue have very courageously gone into the day that repeatedly, and they've seen exactly what I see. It's growing. And and and the thing It says you have to spend time down here. The reason I spend so much time in Darren is because I recognize this as the major invasion route to the United States.
If you can get your feet anywhere in the South America, you can then get anywhere in the United States or Canada very easily within, like, a week or two. Right? All you have to do is get Africa or Asia into South America, or if you're already in South America, get up to Colombia, go through the Darien Gap, and and then you're in the United States.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Club of Rome and the UN introduced Agenda 21 in 1992, leading to destabilizing geopolitical trends. To seize power, they manipulate reality by dismissing truth, facts, and science. Questioning everything is crucial in today's world. This clip concisely outlines Agenda 21's long-term goals. Share to raise awareness.
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Powerful Video: Understand Agenda 21’s Goals In 2 Minutes: Technocommunist Great Reset & One-World Government: Destabilizing geopolitical trends of the 90s, 2000s, can be traced back to the Club of Rome and the UN unleashing Agenda 21 during the 1992 Earth Summit. An important psychological component of the power grab is to invert reality. Truth, facts, & actual science are dismissed as non-credible. Sound familiar? In today’s world, you have to question everything if you want to be wise. This important clip summarizes the goals of Agenda 21, which is part of a longer term plan for the century. Share to spread awareness.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Agenda 21 is a United Nations plan from 1992 that aims to control and inventory everything, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, food, energy, information, and human beings. It focuses on moving populations into concentrated city centers and clearing rural areas. The plan involves non-governmental organizations, corporations, and governments working together to regulate and dictate global affairs. The ultimate goal is to establish a one-world government with total control. This implementation is done through public-private partnerships, which is essentially fascism. It's important for us to be aware of this development and stand up for our freedom.
Full Transcript
Agenda 21, Sustainable Development. It is the Inventory and Control Plan. Inventory and control of all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world. And this is a plan that was agreed to by 179 nations back in 1992. It's a United Nations plan. It's called the Agenda for the 21st Century. And so many of us around the world think that sustainable development just sounds so great. Isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and creating energy and food resources for everyone? And the answer is no. It really is not. It's about moving populations into city centers, concentrated city centers, and clearing them out of the rural areas. It's constructed of non-governmental organizations, corporations, and government in order to dictate and regulate what it is that happens around the world. Regionalization is the stepping stone to globalization, and globalization is the standardization of all systems. All systems have to be brought into harmony in order to control them all. And the goal of Agenda 21 is one world government and total control from a central unit. The principles are public-private partnerships, which is fascism. And this is how it's implemented on the ground, is through this joining together between corporations, non-governmental organizations, and governments in order to cut out the actual individual, your voter, and instead to take that to a level where we literally cannot penetrate. This is a corporatocracy. It's a totalitarian state being developed right now, all over the world, while we are moving towards the endgame. We are not there. And this is the opportunity that all of us have now to stand up, to speak out. We are free, and we need to continue to be free. And I do believe that we will win, but we have to become aware that there is a fight.
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2018, the World Health Organization altered the definition of adverse events from immunization. This change is crucial to understand, as it sheds light on the impact of big pharma, the leading cause of deaths worldwide. Sadly, many remain unaware of this significant development. Seek alternative media sources for coverage. Follow this account for untapped information. Spread awareness. #StayInformed
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Must Watch: Did You Know? Definition Of Adverse Event From Injections Was Changed In 2018: What It Means @DrDMartinWorld, “In 2018, The World Health Organization changed the definition of an adverse event from immunization.” It’s important to recognize that big pharma is the #1 kiIIer in the world. The tragedy of this conversation is, many people are hearing this information for the first time. What alternative media have you heard cover this? Listen carefully & share this clip.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2018, the World Health Organization changed the definition of an adverse event from immunization, only considering published literature. This means that genetically modified injections have no established adverse events. So when Pfizer and Moderna claim no adverse events, they are technically telling the truth. This change occurred just before the pandemic, leading some to speculate it was part of a plan. It's concerning that this information is not widely known, as discussing it can lead to censorship. Big pharma is the biggest killer in the world, surpassing even the military industrial complex. They have caused more deaths than guns and bullets. Big pharma is a means of controlling and limiting our freedoms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2018, the World Health Organization changed the definition of an adverse event from immunization. That the only adverse event that they would be willing to consider is an adverse event that is already established in published The literature. Isn't that fascinating? Because there is no published clinical literature on genetically modified injections. So isn't it cool that you change the definition of an adverse event so legally and technically, when Pfizer and Moderna say we have had no adverse events, They are actually telling the truth.
Speaker 1: Because all of it is
Speaker 0: Because the law changed in 2018 to redefine what an adverse This event from an injection was.
Speaker 1: It changed in 2018 just before the pandemic. It
Speaker 0: it's it's like they saw it mean, I don't know. It feels like it might have been part of a plan. See, these are the things, and once again, this published Medical journals, it's all published. And, and my, the tragedy of this conversation is, you've been around the alt media for a long time. This is the 1st time you're hearing this.
Yep. Right? You should be you should be going, oh, that's old hat. I heard it on this or that or the other thing. Nope.
You don't hear it anyway.
Speaker 1: Even your meter, I haven't discussed this or or dug on it.
Speaker 0: No. And they don't because if you rock This boat.
Speaker 1: You are censored, more than
Speaker 0: You are no. But you're rocking a foundation that even those who think they have courage are unwilling to do. This is actually the white hot core of do we want to be a population that is subservient to tyrants Or do we want to be people living at Liberty? And that question, the vast majority of people don't want to ask because they don't want the answer. And The answer is, right now, we are actually hybridized into this compliant, acquiescent BS that we call humanity.
And the fact of the matter is, We don't want to face that.
Speaker 1: Well, the fact of manner is that, when you go through the deaths which I've seen today, is that big pharma is the biggest killer anything in the world
Speaker 0: No question.
Speaker 1: Big far
Speaker 0: bigger than the military industrial complex. We were advised by the president in 19 sixties, beware of the medical industrial comp or the the, sorry, I that was a Freudian slip. Military industrial complex, we were told that that was the dangerous thing, dangerous thing, dangerous thing. Guess what?
Speaker 1: These deaths are far worse. And when we're
Speaker 0: Pharmaceuticals have killed way more people than guns and bullets have ever done.
Speaker 1: And when you're thinking of control, the they will control all of our populations and limit our freedoms is with big pharma.
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Consider giving this account a follow for information that the mainstream media won’t touch.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a thought-provoking video, XFiles eerily mirrors our current reality. This exemplifies predictive programming, a method to familiarize the public with seemingly far-fetched ideas. Media subtly conditions us, making future societal changes appear natural. By sharing this clip, we can raise awareness about this tactic and encourage critical thinking. Let's stay vigilant. #WakeUp #PredictiveProgramming
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Must Watch: Will This Video Wake Up The Brainwashed? Predictive Programming: Conditioning The Minds Of Society: 7 years ago, X-Files ran an episode that is strikingly familiar with the times we’re currently living in. The more you watch, the stranger it gets. Predictive programming at its core is a tactic used to reduce resistance by introducing concepts that seem far fetched. It is a subtle form of psychological conditioning provided by the media to acquaint the public with planned societal changes to be implemented by leaders (Think Fifth Generation Warfare / 5GW). The idea is, if & when these changes are put through, the public will already be familiarized with them and will be more accepting to them as natural progressions, thus lessening possible public resistance and commotion. Share this clip to spread awareness.
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a discussion about the possibility of someone tampering with people's DNA, specifically by removing the ADA gene to shut down their immune systems. This is believed to be done through a virus called the Spartan virus. The process used is called CRISPR Cas9, which cuts genes at a specific location. It is suggested that the government may be involved in hiding this technology and using it for their own agenda, including a takeover of America. There are also mentions of weather wars, electromagnetic waves, and the militarization of police forces. The conversation ends with a mention of a potential attack on America by terrorists.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You and everyone you know has a piece of DNA in your genome, put there without your knowing it. Pushing by whom? Well, that's the question of today. This is an Internet lunatic. You're not saying you believe it.
Speaker 1: Hold on, Agent Einstein. You're talking to a scientist.
Speaker 0: Forgive me, assistant director. It may sound insensitive, but the suggestion is pure science fiction. What I'm saying, agent Einstein, is that the facts, as I understand them, cannot be discounted out of hand. No one has the right or the ability to tamper with your DNA. Unless we gave them that ability.
When you say they're tampering with our DNA, that they're able to shut down our immune systems by the addition of something to our DNA. Yes, what I don't know how exactly. How it's being triggered. I don't know that either. So why it's happening now?
What can we possibly you. We need to act quickly. You were right about that. Well, I was wrong about the science. I was wrong about what's causing it.
Dead wrong, in fact. But it's clearly a widespread failure of our immune system. Through gene tampering. A virus within a virus that was put there through the smallpox what I've seen. It's what these men are calling the Spartan virus.
We have to figure this out. What's wrong with the science? Okay. The Spartan virus removes the adenosine DNA gene from your DNA. Remove the ADA gene and your immune system supposed to be done.
Yeah, but I'm not getting sick. It's only a matter of time. Okay? So how does it work? How does the virus remove the ADA gene?
The process called CRISPR Cas9, RNA and a protein cutting genes at that location. Exactly. But in this instance, he used it as a weapon. The ultimate weapon. The ability to depopulate the planet.
Kill everyone but the chosen by tampering with their DNA.
Speaker 1: Through gene editing.
Speaker 0: Why do such a thing and lie about it?
Speaker 1: Own government. Your own government lies as a matter of course, as a matter of policy, the Tuskegee experiments on black men in the thirties, Henrietta Lacks.
Speaker 0: What are they trying to who.
Speaker 1: That's the missing piece. But it's
Speaker 2: not hard to imagine a government hiding, hoarding technology for 70 years at the expense of human life the the future of the planet, driven not only by corporate greed, but a darker objective.
Speaker 1: The takeover of America.
Speaker 2: And then the world itself, by any means necessary, however violent or cruel or efficient, By severe drought brought on by weather wars conducted secretly using aerial contaminants and high altitude electromagnetic waves
Speaker 1: In a
Speaker 2: state of perpetual war to create problem reaction solution scenarios to distract, enrage, and enslave American citizens at home with tools like Patriot Act and the National Defense Authorization Act, which abridge the constitution in the name of national security, the militarization The station of police forces in cities across the US, the building of prison camps by the Federal Emergency Management Agency with no stated purpose, the corporate takeover of food and the pharmaceuticals and health care, even the military, in clandestine agendas to fatten, dull, sicken, and control a populace already consumed by consumerism.
Speaker 1: And I encourage you all to go shopping more.
Speaker 2: A government that taps your phone, collects your data, monitors your whereabouts with impunity. A government preparing to use that data against you when it strikes, and the final takeover begins.
Speaker 0: The takeover of America.
Speaker 2: By a well oiled and well armed multinational group of elites that will cull, kill, and subjugate.
Speaker 0: Happening as we it here.
Speaker 2: It's happening all around us.
Speaker 1: The other shoe waiting to drop?
Speaker 2: It'll probably start on a Friday. The banks will announce a security action necessitating their computers to go offline all weekend.
Speaker 1: Digital money will disappear.
Speaker 0: They can just steal your money?
Speaker 1: Followed by the detonation of strategic electromagnetic No response to knock out major grids.
Speaker 2: What will seem like an attack on America by terrorists to Russia.
Speaker 0: An invasion of the US.
Speaker 1: The Russians tried it in 47.
reSee.it AI Summary
The WHO, a non-governmental agency, lacks accountability and citizen representation. Dr. David E. Martin exposed their premeditated genocidal program, revealing a criminal cartel profiting from global terrorism. We must recognize this as a conspiracy of racketeers. Watch his presentation for a deeper understanding. Spread awareness.
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Watch: Did You Know? COVID & The WHO (World Health Organization): Premeditated Genocidal Program Of Racketeering Coconspirators: Dr. David E. Martin: @DrDMartinWorld recently exposed the criminal cartel WHO: Plan it, Fund it, Create it, Deploy & Profit from it. Consider that The WHO: - Is a non-governmental agency - Has no elected accountability - Has no appointed accountability - Has no citizen representation “A group of people in the 1940s decided to make a set of rules that only apply to them.” In part of Dr. Martin’s recent presentation in Europe, he mentioned, “Until we treat this as a criminal conspiracy, of criminal racketeers, resulting in global (t e r r o r i s m) for the purpose of profiteering and (m u r d e r); until we have that conversation, we’re having the wrong conversation.” It is a longer clip, so consider playing it on 1.25X speed or bookmarking it for later if you’re short on time. Please share to spread awareness.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) for its lack of accountability and the immunity it grants to its affiliates. They argue that the WHO has granted itself extraterritorial and extrajudicial rights that no other institution would have. The speaker believes that no institution should have absolute immunity and highlights the potential for corruption and malfeasance. They claim that the COVID narrative was a premeditated, genocidal program carried out by racketeering co-conspirators who violated laws in the United States and Europe. The speaker specifically mentions the World Health Organization's Global Preparedness Monitoring Board as a violation of the Clayton Act in the US and a criminal collusion network.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, listen. I mean, the WHO, as I articulated in that presentation, has a background which is ironically criminal in its origins, and I find it fascinating that we somehow as reasonable citizens are overwhelmed when we find out that criminals do criminal things. I mean, it's kind of one of those self evident, a bit self fulfilling prophecies. And so I find it fascinating that we have a world in which the unconsidered nature of a nongovernmental organization that has no elected accountability, has no appointed accountability, has no citizen representation whatsoever, is somehow capable of granting itself extraterritorial and extrajudicial rights that no other institution on earth would be allowed to grant, much less institution on earth would be allowed to grant, much less recognized for its granting.
And so let's unpack exactly the point. The point is that the World Health Organization grants its affiliates absolute criminal, civil and economic immunity from all, not some, from all of their actions as long as those actions are undertaken under the auspices of the Who. In other words, there is an extrajudicial, extra territorial, extra sovereign condition granted that ceded that of diplomatic immunity. It exceeds that of any other jurisdiction where a group of people in the 1940s decided to make a set of rules that only apply to them. They can kill, they can maim, they can bribe, they can be corrupt, they can financially get into all kinds of malfeasance, they can money launder, they can serve as an illegal organization for the promotion of their economic interests, and by the definition in their charter, they are immune from prosecution absolutely.
And my view is really simple, there is no human institution on the planet, and I mean none, that should be afforded absolute immunity. The fact of the matter is that since 16/0/4, and since the corporations' acts that actually grew out of the Dutch and the British realms in the very early parts of 17th century, the idea that we were going to allow corporations to act as individuals and thereby shield individuals from liability is the 1st step down the slippery slope, but by the time we get to 1947, that by the time we get to the establishment of the nongovernmental organizations inside of the UN affiliated programs, you have these unbelievable, tyrannical impulses that say, We are going to pass a set of rules, we are going to make sure that no rules apply to us other than the ones we make, and my point was simple in the presentation in the Parliament. The entirety of the COVID narrative was a premeditated, genocidal program a racketeering co conspirators who were violating federal statutes in the United States, clearly violating competitive laws in Europe, and they were doing so with impunity, and they were doing so under the protection of even a dotted line into the World Health Organization, which is the World Health Organization's Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which is a very clear violation of the Clayton Act in the United States and unambiguously creates a criminal collusion network, which is open and shut racketeering on both sides of the Atlantic.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Bank for International Settlements plans to gain absolute control over personal spending through a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). Some governments, influenced by the World Economic Forum, may impose harsh currency laws. This would be linked to an AI social credit score system, surveilling and controlling spending. The BIS operates independently, serving as the monetary arm of a OneWorld Government. This hints at a glimpse of total totalitarianism. Spread awareness about the implications of accepting a CBDC.
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Must Watch: CBDC Gameplan: Total Control Over Your Personal Spending (Summarized): In the clip, you will hear the Bank for International Settlements general manager Agustín Carstens stating they will have "absolute technological control" over your personal spending under a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). In some nations, a UBI (Universal Basic Income) bribe will be a necessary step in gaining the adoption of a CBDC, but there are currently enough World Economic Forum penetrated governments that will outright subject their citizens to harsh currency laws. This would be tied to an A.I. social credit score system that would algorithmically surveil and control personal spending. The Bank for International Settlements operates outside of all sovereign government laws, serving as the monetary arm of a One-World Government. In other words, this is a glimpse into total-totalitarianism. Please share to spread awareness. Would you accept the use of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC)?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The main difference with a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is that the central bank will have complete control over the rules and regulations governing its use. They will also have the technology to enforce these rules. This is significant because it sets CBDCs apart from cash.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The key difference in with the CBDC is that Central Bank will have absolute control on the rules and regulations that will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability. And also we will have the technology to enforce that. Those 2 issues are extremely important and that makes a huge difference with respect to what cash
reSee.it AI Summary
The Flexner Report: How Rockefeller and Carnegie gained control of the medical industry. Despite vast pharma wealth, diseases and suffering persist. What went wrong? The answer lies in the Flexner Report, enabling centralized medical systems and pharma dominance. Small schools closed, merged with industry-backed universities. Today, medical creation requires government permission, adhering to outdated protocols. Spread awareness.
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Watch: Did You Know? The Flexner Report: How Rockefeller & Carnegie Gained Total Control Of The Medical Industry: "Despite the huge amount of money accumulated in the pharma industry, there are more dreadful diseases & sick people today than ever.” After over 100 years, we must ask the question: What went wrong? You will find the answers in the Flexner Report, a documentation that created and enabled the terms of a centralized medical system and pharma industry to take over the control. Small medical schools were either closed or merged into universities financially supported by industrial companies. According to the present-day consequences of the report, no medical school can be created without the permission of government, and medical research adheres fully to the protocols of scientific research (of the 1910s - materialism, medication and vaccination). Share this clip to spread awareness.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1907, the American Medical Association (AMA) involved the Carnegie Foundation to study medical education in the US and Canada. The report, known as the Carnegie Foundation bulletin number 4, was authored by Abraham Flexner, who was not a physician but had ties to the Rockefeller Institute. The report aimed to improve medical service by establishing education based on scientific principles. It promoted materialism, the belief that everything is composed of matter, and demoted alternative medicines. As a result, many medical schools closed or merged, and the number of medical students decreased. The report's influence extended worldwide, but its long-term consequences include high rates of medical mistakes and deaths. The pharmaceutical industry also gained control.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1907, the AMA, American Medical Association, involved the Carnegie Foundation in elaborating a book length study of medical education in the United States and Canada, also known as the Carnegie Foundation bulletin number 4. The author, Abraham Flexner, was an ambitious educator. Neither a physician neuromedical scientist, but the brother of Simon Flexner, employed by the Rockefeller Institute For Medical Research. Later on, Abraham Flexner became the 1st director of the Rockefeller Philanthropy Programs in Medical Education. Andrew Carnegie was regarded as the 2nd richest man in history after John D.
Rockefeller. While Carnegie played a leading role in the American steel industry in education. Rockefeller was interested in oil industry and medical research. Abraham Flexner's report was published in 1910, and the purpose was to improve the quality of medical service by establishing professional medical education based on mainstream scientific principles. But what was accepted as science in the early 20th century.
The theory of materialism rising in the 18th century, holds that the only existing thing is matter. Everything is composed of material, and all phenomena, including consciousness, human soul, and spirit, are the results of material interactions. In other words, matter is the only substance. Scientific materialism, physicalism, became the philosophical position of the early 20th century. The main statement of physicalism is that there are no kinds of things other than physical things.
When a hypothesis is repeated long enough, it often becomes a fundamental rule of life. It is assumed to be true. Before the Flexner report was released, twice as many physicians practiced alternative medicines than conventional allopathic medicine. And medical knowledge was taught in small private schools all over the USA. The report changed everything.
And backed by the police power of each American state, Medical schools were obliged to follow the trend set by the Carnegie Foundation. The human body belongs to the animal world. It is put together of tissues and organs. It grows, reproduces itself, decays according to general laws. It is liable to attack hostile physical and biological agencies.
Herbs, homeopathy, chiropractic and massage were demoted as quackery. Small medical schools were either closed or merged into universities financially supported by industrial companies. In less than 10 years, the number of medical schools dropped from 650 to 50. The number of medical students decreased from 7,500 to 2,500 as they were unable to afford the high education fees. The report included a detailed regulation of medical education and pharmacology as the only solution against dreadful diseases.
According to the present day consequences of the report, no medical school can be created without the permission of government, and medical research adheres fully to the protocols of scientific research. Of the 19 tens, materialism, medication, and vaccination. Supply of physicians were restricted. Incomes of the remaining practitioners raised and conventional medical schools began to be centralized. In 1997, the WHO obtained full control of the medicine as the validity of the Flexner Report was extended worldwide.
And of what was the long term result of reforming the medical education and practice? Hardly any news in the media. According to the 2003 medical report, death by medicine, 780 the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, the UK, same. The same thing happened in the past, the same thing happened in the past. The same thing happened in the past, the same thing happened in Haya 106,000 of the nearly 800,000 cases are from prescription drugs.
The United States spends $282,000,000,000 annually on deaths due to medical mistakes or iatrogenic deaths. According to a 1995 US iatrogenic report, the annual automobile accident mortality rate forty five thousand. On the other hand, annually, over 1,000,000 patients get injured in hospitals and 280,000 of these cases result in death. In 2004, the U. S.
A. Spent $1,400,000,000,000, fifteen point 5% of the GDP on health care. More than 1 third was paid to the pharmaceutical industry. After 100 years, we must raise the question. What went wrong?
Despite the huge amounts of money accumulated in the pharmaceutical industry, there are more dreadful diseases and sick people today than ever? You will find the answers in the Fleckner Report, a documentation that created and enabled the terms of a centralized medical system and pharma industry to take over control.
reSee.it AI Summary
New COVID boosters, according to Dr. Peter McCullough, are untested, unnecessary, and potentially unsafe. He warns that they lack clinical evidence and may be ineffective. Some individuals have already received eight shots. Listen to the informative discussion at 125X speed or save it for later. Spread the word.
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Watch: Unpopular New COVID Boosters Expected To Be Unsafe And Ineffective: Dr. Peter McCullough: "People who are following the narrative right now, they're on their 8th shot." @P_McCulloughMD joins @TheRedactedInc to inform listeners on how the new COVID boosters are untested, not medically necessary, not clinically indicated, and expected to be unsafe and ineffective. It is a longer clip, so consider playing it on 1.25X speed or bookmarking it for later if you're short on time. Please share.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker expresses concerns about the new monovalent vaccines, stating that they are obsolete and ineffective against the current dominant strain. They also mention that COVID-19 cases among 6-month-olds are not a significant concern. The speaker discusses the idea that previous vaccination may make individuals more susceptible to COVID-19 and sheds light on the potential shedding of spike proteins after vaccination. They criticize the emergency use authorization and question the motives behind the government's push for vaccination. The speaker concludes by stating that masks are ineffective and recommends nasal sprays and gargles for hygiene. They emphasize that the vaccines are neither safe nor effective in reducing hospitalization and death.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you for joining us. Can you provide your reaction and just make it clear, this is not the original monovalent vaccine. This is not the bivalent. This is a brand new thing. So, why are we getting so little information about it?
What do you think of this?
Speaker 1: I'm not recommending them for my patients at all or for family members. These are now monovalent vaccines Directed against XBB 1.5 Omicron subvariant strain, that strain now is nearly It's only 3.1% of all strains out there. The current outbreak is driven by the ARRIS or EG5 strain, which is most prominent And what we see is a pattern here where the Pfizer and Moderna are constantly behind by the time they actually develop the RNA code For, you know, for a particular sub variant strain quickly the virus mutates away into another strain. So these are obsolete, there are no studies showing they would ever work against EG5 and to my knowledge, they're not any safer. Expect the same safety profiles we've seen with all the prior vaccines.
Speaker 2: So our sick I wanna talk about the 6 month olds because they're And this is under the emergency use authorization, doc, which is so there's an emergency and among 6 month olds on up. So are you seeing An emergency of COVID among 6 month olds?
Speaker 1: No. Not at all. We're we're not hearing about it at all in children. I've had some adults with the recent, presumably air Strange, very mild, it's like a common cold and no fever, no pulmonary involvement, we just use the virucidal nasal sprays and gargles, And they work just fine, just over the counter solutions, haven't had to prescribe any drugs. We don't believe the hospitalization data are adjudicated, Meaning that, the hospital started testing people again and people test positive for many months afterwards.
They're not bonafide COVID cases that's that are winding up in the hospital.
Speaker 0: No, in fact, just today, the CDC's data shows that even though Positivity test rates are increased. Death rates are down almost to an unmeasurable number. So that actually verifies what you just set is high numbers of positive cases do not mean high numbers of serious cases and we don't have any data to show that this is any more serious, do we?
Speaker 1: No, we don't. In fact, the virus has become progressively more mild, that's great. We know a paper from and colleagues Harvard, 97% of us have actually been through the virus clinically or sub clinically And so 2nd infections have a zero risk of hospitalization and death as shown by Chin and colleagues doing internal medicine October of 2022. So I don't worry about Any of my patients being hospitalized with COVID at this point in time, every so often I'll get somebody who's, you know, never had COVID before, there is completely new to them And, I've had to advise on a case recently where we needed to, you know, give an oral medicine like Ivermectin or doxycycline or prednisone, but It's very rare now.
Speaker 2: What about this as a preexisting condition? The idea that if you've had vaccines before, you might now be be more open To, to getting COVID that you are now somehow you have less protection. Can you speak about that? Which I find unbelievable. You couldn't say 3 years ago, you would have been outlaw, outcasted for this.
Speaker 1: I know, but, you know, all the the, countries that actually fairly report, cases, hospitalizations, deaths by vaccine status like the UK does show much higher risks for the So every single vaccine that's taken, there's more and more risk. There was a Cleveland Clinic study by Shrutha that showed the same thing. So what's going on is what, Wheatley and colleagues Predicted in 2021 is called immune imprinting. The body is being misdirected against antiquated strains. So, when the new strain hits, the vaccinated are actually more likely to acquire it and get sicker.
Those with immuno immunity, you know, have already faced The virus and against all the components of the virus, are in much better shape to actually, you know, manage an infection if they have it. It's the strangest thing to keep taking shots every 6 months but yet be more and more prone to having the illness the shots are supposed to prevent.
Speaker 0: Strange indeed. In fact, I was going over the fact sheet for each of the vaccines, 1 approved by Moderna, 1 approved by Pfizer. Both of them say this exactly under the section what are the benefits of the vaccine, says the duration of protection against COVID nineteen is currently unknown. So they don't know. They didn't test.
They don't seem to care and that leaves open the window. What I get concerned about as it leaves open a window to make you take another one in 4 to 6 months. That's not a question. I think you can respond.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but we've never had any type of vaccine where people who are following the narrative right now, they're on their 8th shot. We've never given 8 shots of any type of foreign antigen or killed vaccine or live attenuase vaccine, let alone 8 injections Of a novel genetic code, where we we don't see any evidence that the genetic code is broken down or disposed of in the human body. It's Pseudourinated, it's modified to be very resistant to human ribonucleases. The spike protein seems to have a very, very long duration of time in the body after it's produced by the vaccines. A recent paper by Brogna and colleagues, shocking, they were able to use mass And identify the spike protein truly coming from the vaccine because there's a certain signature, amino acid signature profile on it And that is widely circulating in the body in their study up to over a 180 days in about 50% of people who took the shots.
That means 50% of people took the shots walking around out there. Can you imagine every 6 months they take a shot? They'll have continually circulating spike protein. The spike protein we know causes damage to tissues, organs, causes blood Clotting and the complications all associated with the vaccines.
Speaker 0: Right. Which is not any more conjecture because those things you just said are on the fact sheet now. They weren't originally, but they are now at least on these, so you are given this warning, I guess, if that's when
Speaker 1: you go. Yes, true patients are fairly worn down, the doctors are. There's over 3,400 papers in the peer reviewed literature on this, over 800 On myocarditis, we have compelling evidence from the autopsy studies, papers by Holscher, colleagues, I'm the senior author, 73.4% of the deaths that occur after the vaccine are truly due to the vaccine that's now proven. The benefits are very, very Limited theoretical conjectures at this point in time. With no clinical data on the BA.
4, BA. 5 booster, it Completely flop, now we have none on the XBB1.5, it's another flop being introduced into the market On the efficacy side, and I think it'll be more continued safety concerns for people who take them. Fortunately, very few people in America are taking them.
Speaker 2: Chris Kingdom in our chat says, how can they approve an emergency vaccine if there's no emergency? And then also Red Spartan on our Rumble chat says, can you ask the doctor about Shedding. Yeah. How's it an emergency? And can you talk about the shedding?
Speaker 1: The emergency use authorization was a mechanism That is completely predicated on having both a national emergency and a public health emergency declared by HHS. So, the vaccines are Vaccines are government property issued as military countermeasures essentially. So, when the Biden administration on schedule, Drop the overall national emergency and Bereshera, drop the public health emergency, we should have been done, We should have been completely done, but FDA Commissioner, Rob Califf came out and said, no, the vaccines are going to continue despite The lack of a national emergency. So here, the FDA is just enabling this. The question is, who's giving the FDA these orders?
Well. The FDA is supposed to be an independent watchdog who's giving the orders. You know, there is great concern by the way, I'll take all the rest, second part is about shutting Helene Binoon and INCRM, former scientist at INCRM was probably the most knowledgeable and she's pretty convinced the shedding is occurring both of the messenger RNA As well as, the spike protein, messenger RNA is circulating in the blood at least a month after the shots, spike protein, you know, widely circulating For 6 months or more, so there's got to be a period of time where people take the shots they theoretically could shed onto someone else with a lot of contact.
Speaker 0: Well, it it does seem like the CDC and the FDA are sort of wagging the dog, for lack of a better term because tomorrow, they will meet to decide which populations to recommend. And if they decide that they agree with the FDA, which we have no reason to believe they won't, then taxpayers, the federal government will pay for these shots. So whether you want it or not Personally, American taxpayers will be paying for it. You know, I know I don't want to ask you to ring in on business deals and government corruption, but do you have a reaction to that?
Speaker 1: At this point in time, they shouldn't be government property. They should be commercial products, people should, You know, should buy them, they should sell, you know, should be bought and sold, commercially approved by insurance companies unless they Enter into the marketplace as commercial products like other biopharmaceuticals, this offering of government property that is, you know, Many times brought forward under the setting of pressure, coercion, threat of reprisal mandates, is making people Seemingly uncomfortable. Do you know they are government property in every single country in the world? That's hard to imagine. Three, you know, three and a half years into the pandemic that these are still forms of government, property.
They should be just commercial products. People should decide to to purchase them, should they want them.
Speaker 2: Yeah. As you write in your book biopharmaceutical complex, The just like the military industrial complex needs to make its money. I'll get you out of here on this, doctor. You've been great gracious with your time. We wanna allow you to get back to your patients.
Mhmm. Which is just turning on television, seeing all of these television doctors that work for, like, the local NBC affiliates and the local CBS affiliates. And then you have Jean Pierre at the White House podium And, you know, getting up there telling American people, yeah. You know, it's getting scary out there. Go out and take these shots.
That's the best thing that you can do right now. Mask up. Go get the shots. What do you say to that?
Speaker 1: Masks don't work. Many people are now standing up against masks. Many gov many governors, former President Trump, scientifically, they don't work. We should forget the masks, but I tell you, the nasal sprays and gargles really work. Everybody should be outfitted with those when they travel.
It's good for just general hygiene to avoid common cold, flu anyway. And then, the vaccines are not safe, not effective, and we can't tolerate our government officials making false claims, so Jean Jean Pierre the other day was saying The vaccines are the best way to stay safe from hospitalization or death. The vaccines have never been shown to reduce hospitalization and death in any perspective double blind randomized placebo controlled trials nor in any valid observational studies, recent paper on the preprint server by Michaels and colleagues That have analyzed all the deaths in the Pfizer dossier that occurred after the data cutoff for the very first meeting on December 10th, 2020 by the FDA actually showed 38 more deaths, majority with Pfizer. There were actually more deaths with Pfizer The moment they were approved by the EUA and the FDA missed it, Pfizer missed it or concealed it and that pattern Of excess death, particularly excess cardiovascular death and excess threefold cardiovascular death, that should have actually Halted the program right there. Pfizer never should have been approved in or on the market.
Speaker 2: Doctor Peter McCullough, thank you so much for taking some time out This afternoon there at the hospital, we really, really appreciate it. Thank you so much for your expertise and insight as always. Thanks, doc.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Mattias Desmet delivers a powerful speech alongside PMcCulloughMD in the EU Parliament. He sheds light on escaping totalitarian systems, emphasizing the need to speak out against perceived wrongs. Desmet explores the psychology behind mass formation psychosis, propaganda, and the distinctions between totalitarian systems and classical dictatorships. He urges listeners to reject false narratives. Watch the enlightening speech at 125X speed or save it for later. Spread the word.
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Must Watch: Will This Speech Wake Up The Brainwashed? The Answer That Everyone Is Looking For: By Dr. Mattias Desmet: @DesmetMattias sits alongside @P_McCulloughMD in the EU Parliament, giving a powerful speech. He provides insight on the single way to escape a totalitarian system like we’ve seen in recent years. “It’s time to start speaking out. It’s time to start telling that you feel there is something wrong. Because otherwise, we will go to a state in which nobody can stop the system anymore.” Mattias also describes the psychology behind a totalitarian system, mass formation psychosis, the use of propaganda, and how totalitarian systems are different from a classical dictatorship. Do not listen to the false narratives. It is a longer clip, so consider playing it on 1.25X speed or bookmarking it for later if you’re short on time. This is Dr. Mattias Desmet’s Speech. Please share.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Professor Matthias Desmet, a clinical psychologist and psychoanalyst, discusses the emergence of a new form of totalitarianism in society. He explains that this form, known as velvet glove technocratic totalitarianism, is led by technical experts who believe rational knowledge is the only way to manage society. Desmet highlights the psychological dynamics of this system, where a fanatical elite and a vulnerable population become convinced of a certain narrative and impose it on society. He emphasizes the importance of recognizing the dangers of this system and encourages individuals to speak out against it to prevent its further spread.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The next speaker, professor doctor Madias Desmetz. He is a professor of clinical psychology at the department of Psychology and Educational Science of Ghent University in Belgium. He works as a psychoanalyst in private practice. DESMET is the author of several books including the international bestseller, The Psychology of Totalitarianism. Furthermore, he is one of the founders of the single case archive.
In 2018, he received the evidence based Psychoanalytic Case Study Price of the Association For Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy and in 2019, he received the Wim Kreuzberg prize of the Dutch Association of Psychotherapy. Since the onset of the corona onsets of the corona crisis in 2020. He became known as the world's leading expert on the theory of mass formation. He was invited on numerous podcasts and talk shows including Tucker Carlson Today. Matthias Desmet explains the effects of the WHO's new provisions, information control and censorship on people's individuals' decision making and the effects Democracy and the effects on democracy as a whole.
Infodemic is the word here. Thank you, Matthias.
Speaker 1: Thank you for introducing me, Doctor. Haber Mok. My colleague, Doctor. McCullough, just asked you Not to fall prey to the false narratives in the corona crisis and throughout the last 3 years. I tried to explain and describe why so many people did fall prey to all these false narratives, why in many respects it was clear that they were false narratives.
So that was the focus of my work. I described what was going on in our society as a proof of mass formation, which is a kind of, psychological group formation, of Which is happening in the beginning stages of the emergence of totalitarian states. Totalitarian states of Which are often confused with so called classical dictatorships. Many people think that of A totalitarian state is a classical dictatorship, but it is something completely different. In a classical dictatorship, a small regime seizes Control over Society, usually through a demonstration of its aggressive potential.
But the emergence of a totalitarian state Happens in a completely different way. And we know the best, historically speaking, the best known examples of totalitarian states are, The Soviet Union in the first half of the twentyth century and Nazi Germany. What you are dealing with now, I think, is a completely different kind of Totalitarianism, on the one hand different, on the other hand very similar. I'm afraid we are being confronted with the emergence of the so called velvet glove totalitarian technocratic totalitarianism, a kind of totalitarianism which is led of by technical experts, which believe that they, the only way to manage society It's through rational knowledge. So what we are going through now, I think, is a replacement of a democratic model by a technocratic model, a technocratic model which in the end will be as dangerous, I think, as the fascist and communist totalitarianism of the first half of the twentyth century.
So, What happens in the beginning stages of a totalitarian system at the psychological level As the emergence of what Hannah Arendt called in a very evocative way, the diabolic pact between the elite and the masses. A substantial part of the elite, The leaders of the of society and a substantial part of the population become fanatically convinced of a certain narrative, a certain ideology, a certain theory, becomes so fanatically convinced of it that they believe that it is their duty of To impose it to society in a relentless way, transgressing all normal ethical boundaries. Of And there's, we've seen this process happening not only in the 1st part of 20th century, But we've seen it happening. We've seen it slowly emerging throughout the last, let's say, the last 2 centuries. Starting from the French Revolution onwards, We've seen how a new elite emerged.
A new elite which seized control of society or which Try to impose its will to society, not in an overt way as the ancient elite did, but in a much more covered way Through indoctrination and propaganda immediately after the French Revolution, as soon as the religious view on men in the world, was replaced by our contemporary materialist human in the world. The elite couldn't impose its will anymore in an overt way, and they found a solution to that. Define a solution by imposing its will without the population knowing they were doing what Edith wanted. Of It was at that moment that modern propaganda was born. And throughout the last 2 centuries, propaganda became more and more and more important.
Politicians, leaders, used more propaganda manipulation of the population throughout the last 2 centuries. And now we are living, I think, in a public space, which is constantly saturated of And at the same time, and that's something extremely important. Or I will add one more thing to the emergence of propaganda in the last 2 centuries. I think that of the Pandemic Treaty and amendments to the international health regulations that have been discussed here of Or just one huge step forward at the level of, the use of propaganda to convince the population of To accept the replacement of a democratic system by a technocratic system. So that's one part of the story.
The other part of the story is of That the psychological state of the population changed throughout the last few centuries. The population became more and more atomized, to use a philosophical term, meaning that more and more people started to feel lonely, were confronted with lack of meaning making and experienced so called Free floating anxiety, frustration and aggression, which means a major parallel population got in this state of Which made it extremely sensitive for indoctrination propaganda. And as the combination of the 2, the combination of Government or an elite which believes that propaganda is the only way to keep control over society. And on the other hand, a population which is in a state in which it is extremely vulnerable to Endropnesian propaganda, which gave rise to totalitarianism, to this pact between an elite who manipulates a population and a certain part of the population, the so called masses or the crowds, which blindly believe the propaganda that leads to this deadly mixture, which is called totalitarianism. So, I think it's very important to realize, I think, for everyone, That a totalitarian system is a blind system.
Even the people who go along with it, even the people who buy into the system, in the end, Fall prey to it. Nobody is safe for a totalitarian system. And in the end, there is only one way, I think, Only one way to stop the emergence of a totalitarian system, and it is by everyone who realizes that something is going wrong, To stop to con to stop going along with the narrative and to start to speak out. Everyone who feels that there is something wrong, and there are many people. I believe in total something like 70% of the people feels that something is wrong with the narratives, that now sees control of society.
Well, it's time to start speaking out, I think. It's time to start telling that you feel that there is something wrong. Because otherwise, we will go to a state In which nobody can stop the system anymore simply because it's not only an elite, that A cruel elite or an evil elite, that mismanages the world. It's much more than that. It's a mass that is on the move.
It's a blind societal system of which nobody is in control anymore. So that has always been my main message, and I continue to repeat it. It's important that we, Each in our own way, speak out in public space, that we learn the art of what was once called truth speech, of That we try to optimize it, to cultivate that art, and in this way that we prevent the only real remedy for the problems we are facing now in a society.
reSee.it AI Summary
John D. Rockefeller's influence on modern medicine involved erasing references to natural cures from medical textbooks. Dissenting doctors were silenced and stripped of their licenses. Rockefeller capitalized on this opportunity to monopolize the oil, chemical, and medical industries. Petrochemicals, easily patented, became highly profitable. Share this clip to raise awareness.
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Watch: Did You Know? How John D. Rockefeller Founded Modern Medicine And Took Away Natural Cures: “Any mention of the healing powers of herbs, plants, and diet was erased from most medical textbooks.” Doctors and professors who objected the Rockefeller’s plan were crucified by the media, removed from the American Medical Association (AMA), and stripped of their license to teach and practice medicine. Sound familiar? This was a major opportunity for Rockefeller who saw the ability to monopolize the oil, chemical and the medical industries at the same time. The best thing about petrochemicals was that everything could be patented and sold for high profits. Share this clip to spread awareness.
Video Transcript AI Summary
John D. Rockefeller seized control of US media and medicine, promoting petroleum-based drugs as the gold standard while labeling traditional healing methods as quackery. He bought a German pharmaceutical company that produced war chemicals for Hitler, then used his political influence to ensure only his approved curriculum was taught in medical schools. Any mention of natural healing was erased from textbooks, and dissenting doctors were punished and silenced. Rockefeller founded the American Cancer Society to suppress evidence linking petroleum-based medicines to cancer. He is credited as the founder of the pharmaceutical industry, which now wields immense power through lobbying. Big Pharma's influence surpasses even that of Big Oil, making it the most powerful industry in America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Around the same time that John d Rockefeller seized US media, he also hijacked US medicine. When it was discovered that drugs could be produced from petroleum, America's top oil mogul ordered his army of propagandists to invert reality accordingly. Medicines used for 1000 of years were suddenly classified as alternative, while the new petroleum based, highly addictive, and patentable drugs were declared the gold standard. After buying a German pharmaceutical company that manufactured chemicals of war for Adolf Hitler, Rockefeller leveraged his political influence by pressing Congress to declare natural healing modalities, unscientific quackery. Rockefeller then took control of the American Medical station and began offering massive grants to top medical schools under the mandate that only his approved curriculum be taught.
Any mention of the healing powers of herbs, plants, and diet was erased from most medical textbooks. Doctors and professors who objected to Rockefeller's plant were crucified by the media, removed from the AMA, and stripped of their license to teach and practice medicine, those who dare to speak out were arrested and jailed. When evidence began to emerge that petroleum based medicines were causing cancer, mister Rockefeller founded the American Cancer Society through which he suppressed that information. John d Rockefeller is duly credited as the founder of the pharmaceutical industry, and the reason that medical error is currently the 3rd leading cause of death in America. This is not an indictment against doctors.
More than anyone, they are under the stranglehold of the single largest lobbying power in Washington. Every year, the pharmaceutical industry spends at least twice the amount as Big Oil to influence laws, policies, and public perception. Thanks to mister Rockefeller, the architect of American monopolies, no industry has more power over our lives than Big Pharma.
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Peter McCullough, a renowned medical expert, recently testified in the European Parliament, urging a complete halt to all COVID vaccinations. He believes that the vaccines, including future boosters, are unsafe for human use. His speech is a must-watch, shedding light on crucial concerns. For more insightful information, consider following an account that covers topics untouched by mainstream media. Share this vital message.
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Must Watch: Dr. Peter McCullough Calls For Complete Stop To All COVID Injections - Not Safe For Human Use (9/13/23): @P_McCulloughMD testifies in the European Parliament to end all COVID vaccinations. “I submit to you the COVID-19 vaccines and all of their progeny & future boosters are not safe for human use.” It is a longer clip, so consider playing it on 1.25X speed or bookmarking it for later if you’re short on time. This is Dr. Peter McCullough’s Speech. Please share.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, discusses the adverse effects of both the SARS-CoV-2 infection and the COVID-19 vaccines. He criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) for its role in the cover-up of the virus's origins and its lack of support for early treatment protocols. Dr. McCullough highlights the dangers of the mRNA vaccines, including cardiovascular disease, neurologic issues, blood clots, and immunologic abnormalities. He urges people to reconsider taking any more shots and calls for the removal of the vaccines from the market. Dr. McCullough also suggests that major stakeholders should withdraw from the WHO.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's an honor and privilege to have Doctor. Peter McCullar from Texas in the United States of America with us today. Thank you. He is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist holding degrees from Baylor University, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School University of Michigan and Southwestern Methodist University. He manages common infectious diseases as well as the cardiovascular complications of both the viral infection and the injuries developing after the COVID nineteen injections in Dallas, Texas, U.
S. A. Doctor. Peter McCullough has broadly published on a range of topics in medicine with over 1,000 publications and 6 85 citations in the National Library of Medicine. Doctor.
McCullough testified multiple times in the U. S. Senate and many state houses on aspects of the pandemic response. Doctor. McCullough has had years of dedicated academic and clinical efforts in combating the SARS CoV-two virus and in doing so, has reviewed thousands of reports, participated in scientific congresses, group discussions, press releases and has been considered among the world's experts on COVID nineteen.
Thank you.
Speaker 1: Thank you for that introduction, and thanks for all the warm greetings today. Thanks to Ms. Anderson, members of parliament and ladies and gentlemen. As introduced, I'm Doctor. Peter McCullough.
I'm a practicing internist, a cardiologist and epidemiologist, and I've been Completely dedicated since the onset of the pandemic to doing everything I can to help each and every patient. These are my observations, and this is my analysis. There have been 2 waves of injury to the world. The first has been the SARS CoV-two infection, Which preyed upon the frail and the elderly. And then the 2nd wave of injury now has been the COVID-nineteen vaccines.
The role of the WHO appears to be adverse in both of these. The role of the WHO appears to be operating within a biopharmaceutical complex, A syndicate, a complicated syndicate that has formed over time. It includes the W. H. O, the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, The Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, Gavi, CEPI, the Coalition For Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation that Gates Foundation and the WEF formed largely.
The Department of State in the United States, The National Institutes of Health, the CDC, the FDA, the MHRA in the UK, TGA in Australia, SAFRA in South Africa, the EMA here in Europe this Grouping of nongovernmental organizations with governmental public health agencies is operating as a unit. They're carefully coordinated, And the impact has been adverse. At the outset of the pandemic, there was an investigation by the WHO on the origins of SARS CoV-two. That's when the beginning of the cover up began. Rear Admiral Brett Giroir in the United States nominated 3 independent scientists to go to Wuhan And figure out what was going on.
We knew at that time, and this has all come out in congressional hearings, That Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, Jeremy Farrar, who was at the Wellcome Trust, who is now the Chief Scientist at the WHO, Christian Andersen at Scripps, Edwin Holmes in Sydney, Peter Dessic at the EcoHealth Alliance, They all conspired in January of 2020 to cover up what they knew, that the virus was engineered in a joint U. S. Chinese Collaboration in the lab in Wuhan, China. And they deceived the world with 12 subsequent fraudulent papers in the peer reviewed literature. These were quarterbacked by Jeremy Farrar, who is the Chief Scientist at the WHO.
This is all in the series of reports And the House Select Committee in the United States by the U. S. Congress led by Representative Brad Wenstrup. The WHO has played an adverse role from the very beginning, deceiving the world on the origins of SARS CoV-two. Doctors like us in clinical practice got behind on this because our governments and agencies like the WHO weren't honest with us.
And instead of helping us or at least getting out of the way in terms of treating patients and saving lives, they got in the way And they impeded our ability to treat patients. They effectively created An entire environment of therapeutic nihilism. There are only 2 things that prevented hospitalization and death: One was early treatment early on and then the second was to acquire natural immunity with the 1st episode of the infection. Nothing else worked. There are only 2 bad outcomes, hospitalization and death.
To this day, the WHO does not support, embrace or promulgate early treatment protocols for patients with Acute COVID nineteen. That should tell you something. That should be a wake up call. We're going on 3 years of this. 3 years of this and still nothing to reduce human suffering from the W.
H. O. Nothing. In fact, efforts that enhance human suffering because the 1st wave was the illness. And I've testified in the U.
S. I've said it multiple times. The majority of hospitalizations and deaths were completely avoidable in the highest risk patients with early Interventions starting with virocidal nasal sprays and gargles and then intravenous and oral drugs administered at home to get people through the illness. Now enter the vaccines. Since 2021, the vaccines have ravaged The population in the world.
Worldwide, 2 thirds of people took a vaccine. United States COVID Community State study shows 75% of Americans took a vaccine. Thankfully, 25% didn't. I was the only public health and public figure in the United States in writing to question the vaccines before they came out, and I did it as loudly as I could. The COVID nineteen vaccines in the United States, 94% of Americans took a messenger RNA vaccine.
It is the genetic code For the potentially lethal spike protein part of the virus. It was the worst idea ever to install the genetic Code by injection and allow unbridled production of a potentially lethal protein in the human body For an uncontrolled duration of time, everything we've learned about the vaccines since they've come out is horrifying. There's not a single study showing that the messenger RNA is broken down because it's pseudouridated. It's made synthetically. It cannot be broken down.
There's not a study showing it leaves the body. We now have papers by Kastriuta who demonstrates that messenger RNA circulating for a month. That's as long as they've looked. We have the spike protein, the lethal protein from the vaccines found In the human body after vaccination circulating at least for 6 months, if not longer. And if people take an injection another 6 months, there's another installation in more Circulating potentially lethal protein.
The spike protein is proven in 3,400 Peer reviewed manuscripts to cause 4 major domains of disease. 1 is cardiovascular disease, Heart inflammation or myocarditis. Every regulatory agency agrees the vaccines cause myocarditis. I'm a cardiologist. Before COVID, for years, we've had guidelines in cardiology.
When there is myocarditis, whether it's symptomatic or not, People cannot exert themselves in athletics. It will cause a cardiac arrest. And yet across Europe and across the United States, sports leagues We're injecting young people who had no medical necessity, no clinical indication with these vaccines, and we have seen a montage of cardiac arrests in young individuals. I'm telling you as an expert cardiologist, these cardiac arrests are due to the COVID nineteen vaccine Until proven otherwise. They are.
Other cardiovascular diseases caused by the vaccine, proven Acceleration of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart attacks, so cardiovascular arrest. Posterior Orthostatic Tachycardia Synora POTS or people passing out due to low blood pressure. You have seen montages of people in the media, one after another passing out Like you've never seen before. It is the vaccine until proven otherwise. Aortic dissection, atrial fibrillation, Other arrhythmias cardiac arrest in the absence of myocarditis has been described with the COVID-nineteen vaccines.
The cardiovascular domain of damage in the human body from the vaccine is substantial more than anything we've ever seen with cholesterol, high blood pressure or diabetes. The 2nd major domain is neurologic disease, stroke, both ischemic and hemorrhagic Guillain Barre syndrome ascending paralysis that can lead to death, which it has led to death with messenger RNA vaccines, agreed to by our all of our regulatory agencies, Small fiber neuropathy, numbness and tingling, ringing in the ears, headaches, these are common. 3rd major domain, blood clots. Blood clots like we've never seen before. The spike protein is the most thrombogenic protein we've ever seen in human medicine.
It's found in the blood clots. The spike protein causes blood clots, blood clots larger and more resistant to blood thinners than we've ever experienced in human medicine. I have patients with blood clots now going on 2 years and they are not dissolving with conventional blood thinners due to these vaccines. We can't get these out of the body. We can't get the messenger RNA or the spike protein out of the body as is continually produced.
4th and last domain, immunologic abnormalities. Vaccine induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia and multisystem inflammatory disorder are early Acute syndromes, well described, published. They have their own acronyms, all agreed to by the regulatory agencies. So all of you in the room and all of you listening online are asking, is it me? Is it my family member?
Is it my loved one? Who is going to be the next person to drop after a vaccine? We've seen cardiac arrest now 2 years after these shots. 2 years. I'm the senior author on the largest autopsy study ever assembled of death after COVID nineteen vaccination Worldwide, we searched the literature, 600 papers, all the clinical findings.
We reviewed them with contemporary knowledge, Experts in pathology and clinical medicine. Our conclusion, 73.9% of the deaths After vaccination are due to the vaccine. They are due to the vaccine. When it's suspected myocarditis, In the 2nd paper, of which I'm the senior author, it's 100% of the time. It's due to the vaccine.
Not COVID, Respiratory illness, the vaccine. We are seeing now a third false narrative. The first false narrative was the virus is unassailable. We have to stay in lockdown and be fearful. The second false narrative is take a vaccine, it's safe and effective.
The third false narrative now is it's not the vaccine causing these problems, it's COVID. It's COVID that we saw back in 2020 causing all these problems in 2023. Don't fall for the false narrative. The medical literature at this point in time is compelling. The Bradford Hill criteria For causality have been fulfilled.
The vaccines are causing this enormous wave Of illness. Now could it be you and your family member? A few important papers to finish. One is by Schmeling and colleagues from Denmark demonstrating That about 30% of people who have taken a vaccine have zero side effects. Nothing.
Not even a sore arm. Not even a sensation that anything happened with the injection. Those people appear to be fine forever as if they didn't take a shot. And the data are the same in the United States in our rare system. The 2nd batch group is about 70% of individuals And they have some moderate side effects, some trouble, but they don't seem to really have serious events.
And then there's the small third batch group, 4.2% in the Schmeling data. It's through the roof. Myocarditis, cardiac arrest, blood clots, hemorrhagic stroke, Disabilities, sudden death at home in bed. And the data are the same in the United States. 4.2% of People in Europe right now are in trouble because they were unlucky enough to get a high risk badge.
In the United States, our CDC V safe data, which is self reported data, 10,000,000 Americans, the number is 7.7% Got so sick with a shot, they had to go to the hospital and be treated and or be hospitalized. A Zogby survey done about a year ago, A big representative sample in the United States found 15% of those who took a vaccine have some medical problem that they're dealing with right now. So again, 4.2%, 7.7%, 15%. That's the penumbra. That is the Venn diagram that you're all going to be involved in the calculus.
What's the path forward? The path forward is clearly for no one to take another shot. No one. Now the World Council For Health, which is a multinational evidence based Physician and health care provider organization on June 11, 2022, issued a pharmacovigilance report Looking at 39 safety databases, including the WHO VisiSafe and the EMA databases In the U. S.
Databases. And their conclusion was to remove all the COVID nineteen vaccines off the market For excess risk of death, excess risk of death, okay. On the floor of the U. S. Senate December 7, 2022, I co moderated a session, and our expert panel by Ascent in the U.
S. Senate concluded all the COVID nineteen vaccines should be removed from the market, all of them. No new boosters. And then in March 23, 2023, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, a fact Factual, fact based, evidence based, consensus driven organization, just like the 2 others, also concluded to remove the vaccines from the market. So I submit to you the COVID nineteen vaccines and all of their progeny and future boosters are not safe for human use.
I implore you as a governing body, European medicine agency, to apply All pressure and due urgency to remove the COVID nineteen vaccines from market in the United States. It's going jurisdiction by jurisdiction, probably state by state, we'll remove them off the market if the federal government doesn't do so. It's going to happen. It's going to happen all over the world. The WHO is standing behind these vaccines.
They are far more of a problem than a help to the European Union, and it's my belief That the European Union, the United States and all major stakeholders should actually completely pull out of the WHO and leave the WHO To its own endeavors not to have any jurisprudence, any dominion Over what we do in health care. WHO will never have dominion over what I do as a practitioner with patients in my practice. I'm Doctor. Peter McCullough. Thank you so much for having
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Consider giving this account a follow for information that the mainstream media won’t touch.