TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @_Escapekey_

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

I'm sure everyone knows of the 'Great Reset'. But how many know of the "Global Redesign Initiative"? And that's actually an important piece of the puzzle, yet it flies by largely unnoticed.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

In many ways, GRI is predecessor of the Great Reset. And it's yet another document outlining the necessity of 'good governance' - which is a defined term, and not merely 'governance which is not corrupt', or whatever. World Bank has used it since 1992. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GRI_EverybodysBusiness_Report_2010.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

In the 'Great Reset' you will find 5 priorities - 1. A 'social contract' 2. Net Zero 3. Digitalisation 4. Long-term outlook 5. Global 'cooperation' https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/08/building-blocks-of-the-great-reset/

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Now, the GRI led to 58 specific proposals.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Soo, guess what happens when I ask ChatGPT to fit in those 58 into the 5 priorities, state a percentage related to completion, and ask it in brief what's missing. So here's a list of progressive policies which likely are about to be implemented on a global scale.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

So let's compare these to current discussions at the United Nations. 1. Social Contract.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

2. Net Zero. It's pretty much fully covered. Sure, some discussions need more targeting, but this area is pretty much there.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

3. Digitalisation - again, major overlaps. A few areas yet to be developed, or even discussed.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

4. Long-term outlook. We're short of a number of specialised organisations, but again, it's pretty much bang on.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

5. Global Cooperation is the one trailing. But again, most of these discussions are currently ongoing.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

so all in all, the GRI's 58 suggestions appear strongly aligned with international policy direction since 2010, with discussions had in areas which have not yet been discussed. > 'Yes, that's a fair assessment'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

and that means the 58 suggestions can be used with some level of reliability to predict what's to come in terms of global governance, a new social contract, net zero, digitalisation, and the long term development plan. > Yes, that's exactly right.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

'give a projected timeline of what's to come from now up until 2030 using the above as a palette of hypothetical policy implementation' do NOT treat these as gospel, but rumours which DO deserve attention many of these initiatives exist. they're not bug-eyed conspiracy theory

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

the report is very real. and they even added a list of 'selected proposals' feel free to match these to what's been taking place, and what's about to happen. I think you'll find certain levels of overlap. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GRI_EverybodysBusiness_Report_2010.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

When Klaus Schwab and Mark Malloch-Brown (Open Soros Foundation chief) speak of 'world transformation' I think people should probably pay attention.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

especially as said transformation includes a call for a UN parliamentary assembly (quite literal global governance), 'systemic stewardship' (quite literal global governance), and all built on a foundation of... ETHICS

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and the very first chapter then goes to discuss a 'values framework'. Ie, these values lead to ethics, and those ethics will drive policy and hence governance.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

and as for the "Global Agenda Council on Values"... that then leads to those 'rights and responsibilities' aka 'you have a DUTY to uphold the collective RIGHTS of others'. collectivism. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GAC_Values_2013.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

There are so many documents, and they all fit together, hand in glove. We have this one from 2016. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Values_and_the_Fourth_Industrial_Revolution_WHITEPAPER.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

And that document then refers to this UNECE doc on 'Good Governance'. It's a definition. It's not meaningless words. It's an actual definition, and the World Bank has not handed development aid to any nation which did not adhere since 1992. https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ceci/publications/ppp.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

And I will keep banging this drum until I see sufficient uptake, because 'Good Governance' ultimately come down to - ETHICS. https://www.eupan.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/2011_2_PL_Effectiveness_of_Good_Governance_and_Ethics_in_Central_Administrations.pdf

Page not found – EUPAN eupan.eu

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Good Governance is fundamentally about being 'ethical'. Never mind whose ethics, right? https://libs.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk/2018/05/15/governance-values-and-ethics-in-the-21st-century/

Governance, Values and Ethics in the 21st Century Ethical leadership, a culture of good stewardship and embedded best values have always been essential attributes for good governance and long term success in every organisation. They are... libs.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Because you can be damn certain that these principles will not be democratically selected whatsoever. https://independentsector.org/resource/principles-for-good-governance-and-ethical-practice-resource-center/

Principles for Good Governance and Ethical Practice Resource Center - Independent Sector The Principles for Good Governance and Ethical Practice outlines 33 principles of sound practice for charitable organizations and foundations… independentsector.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

They count on your brain skipping over these terms. Because wtf does 'ethics' mean anyway - it's meaningless, right? Not quite. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JIABR-10-2022-0277/full/html?skipTracking=true

World-class good governance ethics: a key solution to tackle criminal acts in Malaysian public-listed companies | Emerald Insight World-class good governance ethics: a key solution to tackle criminal acts in Malaysian public-listed companies - Author: Wan Ahmad Fauzi Wan Husain, Mohamad Reeduan Mustapha, Yudi Fernando, Siti Aisyah Ahmad Zailani emerald.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

'Good Governance' is a definition, and 'Ethics' are central to this definition. And they count on your brain dismissing 'ethics' because it's meaningless, and 'good governance' because that also is meaningless. It's how they hide things in open sight. https://www.weforum.org/communities/gfc-on-good-governance/

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and they will soon enough apply to every sphere of your life. https://wallacefoundation.org/resource/articles/summary-principles-good-governance-and-ethical-practice

Summary of Principles for Good Governance and Ethical Practice This document summarizes a guide to 33 principles for ethical governance and practice by nonprofits and foundations. wallacefoundation.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Every single one. https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Sheets/2023/The-IMF-and-Good-Governance

The IMF and Good Governance Governance covers all aspects of how a country is governed, including its economic policies, regulatory framework, and adherence to the rule of law. Poor governance offers more incentives and opportunities for corruption—the abuse of public office for private gain. Corruption undermines the public’s trust in its government. It also threatens market integrity, distorts competition, and endangers economic development. imf.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Every single one https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=18258&lang=en

PACE website assembly.coe.int

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and what does it tell you about 'Good Governance', when openly spitting in the face of 2 billion Christians is considered 'Ethical' during an opening ceremony? https://stillmed.olympics.com/media/Documents/Beyond-the-Games/Integrity/Bonne-Gouvernance-EN.pdf https://t.co/YPm39vMLt1

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

… and why would that violate their terms, I wonder. That appears…… extraordinarily strange. https://t.co/AUyv5eoA0J

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

… actually… I have a theory…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

The more I look, the more oddities i find. He’s recently become a born again Christian. But contemporary Christianity has been completely corrupted. And his general points of view align with scientific monism, Paul Carus’s creation, who essentially corrupted the Vatican.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

So the skeptical side of me wonders if he indeed is a pied piper, leading people back to a severely corrupted Christianity. But hard to source. A lot of missing material around his ‘transition’ at end of 2020.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

For those who wonder - Paul Carus fused scientific rationalism into religion at the end of the 19th century - through ethics. And he then chaired the 1893 parliament on worlds religions event, which was from hell itself.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

If you create a combined synthesis of Marx/Carus/Bogdanov/Vernadsky then you’ll find a synthesis which is almost a perfect description of what you see around you. ‘Dialectical observational organised scientific materialism’

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

At that 1893 event, they replaced God with scientific rationalism. And it’s centred around a ‘Global Ethic’ which Brand leans himself up pretty closely without stating those words exactly. Even regular mention of ‘our common good’.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Finally, my thoughts on his book Back then he definitely subscribed to Carus’s scientific monism, which is a blend of materialistic monism (Karl Marx), and ideological monism (observational) - guided by empirical observation (which Vernadsky later added) Something’s off.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

I partially went through Russell Brand's 'Revolution', and I found oddities - He appears to be in tune with Paul Carus's scientific monism, but 'our common good', and even Laszlo's Akashic Field Theory also turn up. Rather a few coincidences here. https://t.co/RoVufWp1jO https://t.co/E1zTBDJf0X

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Ftr - this is not just something I say. https://t.co/bdZi4kc3oY

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Right. 12 minutes in. He starts talking about shared responsibility and ethical substrata. He then speaks of the lack of ‘prevailing ideology’ In sense he’s not going to say ‘global ethics’ - but that is pretty damn close. https://youtu.be/0RxCkQtE-P0?si=BhuCoSyBJtN_Zx_x

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Oh look it’s another coincidence.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

full book over here ftr https://archive.org/details/ethicalproblemt00carugoog/page/n12/mode/2up

The Ethical Problem: Three Lectures on Ethics as a Science : Paul Carus : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Book digitized by Google from the library of University of Wisconsin - Madison and uploaded to the Internet Archive by user tpb. archive.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

1899. They knew what they were doing. Marx (purposive) ==> Carus (normative) ==> Bogdanov (pragmatic) purpose ==> ethics ==> social organisation

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Hey @drjamesbjoyce @NickHudsonCT @iamlisalogan - check it out. This, right there (and above) is why there's a focus on... 'It will be impossible to implant in the souls of men the motive of doing right without telling them what is meant by "right."' ... HUMAN RIGHTS.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@drjamesbjoyce @NickHudsonCT @iamlisalogan those 'human rights' thus lead to 'ethics' through them telling us what supposedly is 'right'. consequently, this must mean that what the Jantsch construct seeks to do is create a framework, where they continuously can modify the human rights as they see fit

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@drjamesbjoyce @NickHudsonCT @iamlisalogan this just clicked, too - 'human rights and responsibilities' would then logically infer that those 'responsibilities' relate to respecting those 'rights'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... seeking to displace religion, in other words...

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

that... really is it. key question - who are said 'leaders of human progress'?

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

it's not religion. it's godless communism. or call it 'technocracy', doesn't matter in the slightest.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

'can ethics be founded upon a scientific basis' ==> 'yes, through fusing science and religion'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

perhaps I should just add this here - Paul Carus chaired the 1893 Parliament on World's Religions.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Oh, I see. So that wasn't true either. Carus wasn't a 'participant and influencer' - he was the chairman of the Parliament of Regions! Sooo... a freemason chaired that event. web.archive.org/web/2017022211…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and 100 years later, at the second event (!) of the Parliament of World Religions in 1993, Hans Kung released 'Towards a Global Ethic' so they basically had 100 years to corrupt religion.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

And do note what I highlighted above - Hans Kung. He penned the 1993 Parliament on World Religions 'Toward a Global Ethic' document, which launched the contemporary drive. https://www.weltethos.org/en/about-the-foundation/what-is-global-ethic/

What is Global Ethic? The Global Ethic Foundation makes the idea of a global ethic very practical. The Foundation was founded by Hans Küng. About his concept weltethos.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

another thing, here, is that Kung received an award courtesy of the freemasons. and honest to god I never took any of this freemason stuff seriously just a year ago.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... though in fairness, that's on the German freemasons own website. https://www.freimaurerei.de/hans-kueng-abschied-von-einem-bruder-im-geiste/

Hans Küng: Abschied von einem Bruder im Geiste © anncapictures - pixabay.com /* widget: Timer Audio Player */ .uc_timer-audio-player .uc_container_image .mejs-currenttime {display: block; font-size: 16px;} .uc_timer-audio-player .uc_container_image .mejs-container .mejs-controls .mejs-duration{display:none;} .uc_timer-audio-player .uc_container_image .uc_audio ... freimaurerei.de

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and just entirely by coincidence, Carus was a freemason.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Right. Carus was a freemason.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

right, returning to this book. '"Before we commence building let us have a plan. Philosophical views and also theologies are by no means mere theories having no practical value.' ... ok, that sounds rather a lot like 'purpose'.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

A fair few references to the 'Societies for Ethical Culture'. Which - mysteriously - also appear to have launched at practically the exact same time. https://www.ethicalstl.org/who-started-ethical-culture-and-what-did-they-believe/

Who started Ethical Culture and what did they believe? "Felix Adler and the four slightly younger men who joined him as founding leaders of the first Societies for Ethical Culture were united in their assertion of the independence and the supremacy of ethics, Adler ethicalstl.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

the field of ethics in fact appears to have continuously opened one battle after another. starts to smell a tad like Frankfurt school critical theory https://ethical.nyc/national-ethical-service-our-voice-at-the-united-nations/

National Ethical Service: Our Voice at the United Nations | The New York Society for Ethical Culture By Elinore Kaplan In 1906, NYSEC founder and Leader Felix Adler was taking an outspoken anti-racist stand. He proposed an international conference on the issue. Gustav Spiller, a Leader in the British Ethical Union (now Humanists UK) and Adler, supported by W. E. B. DuBois, co-convened the First International Races Conference in 1911 at the ethical.nyc

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

and this was supposed to be a merger of science and religion now they hate religion https://ethical.nyc/june-23-the-religious-right-and-the-threat-to-american-democracy/

June 23: The Religious Right and the Threat to American Democracy | The New York Society for Ethical Culture Free and open to the public, in-person and online! Leader Dr. Joe Chuman sits down for an interview with writer and researcher Frederick Clarkson about the current state of the Religious Right and the threat it poses to democracy in the United States. Watch Online Click to join at start time | ID 863 0430 0961 ethical.nyc

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

that guy is a subversive communist

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

an ethics groups, furthering 'social justice', founded in 1876 by Felix Adler. I've heard of that name before. https://ethical.nyc/history/

Ethical NYC History | The New York Society for Ethical Culture ”Without 'ethical culture' there is no salvation for humanity. Albert EinsteinOur Founding In 1876, the New York Society for Ethical Culture (NYSEC) was founded by Dr. Felix Adler, who was both visionary and revolutionary. Dr. Adler proposed a new movement which would work toward the advancement of social justice for all. He suggested that the movement ethical.nyc

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

phwoahr ok, Felix Adler... 'When asked directly if he believed in God, young Felix responded, “Yes, but not in your god.”' ... and... '... long-term challenge of reconstructing institutions like schools and government to promote greater justice in human relations' https://t.co/9pirYsQKCC

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

he comes across a raging marxist. 'Ethical Culture affirms “the supreme worth of the person”' this sounds like outright Satanism. https://t.co/aAvA3EfEzj

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

OMFG ok, Felix Adler is definitely connected. 'respect and dignity' my utter behind. https://t.co/hlRgKaDRUa

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... this is actually interesting, because everyone speaks of ie Frankfurt School Critical Theory, but Adler looked to reform the individual while Frankfurt School focused on institutions. https://t.co/KsD2muyW6e

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

ChatGPT's knowledge of marxist nuance...! 'Adler focused on ethical development of individuals... Frankfurt School concentrated on critiquing and reforming societal institutions, aiming to expose and dismantle the structures of power and oppression that shape human experience' https://t.co/nU6QCMFfKk

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

lol, ChatGPT takes offence to me labelling its hero a 'raging communist' funny how it always stands up for those on the extreme left https://t.co/5oeCJpQxyS

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... either way, it's actually interesting, because that means all the social justice carp tracks back to a raging communist, and whenever you hear of 'deconstructing our <x> structures', its an effort to deconstruct our societal model.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

lol, fertile ground to expose this BS. 'social justice... a broad range of issues and perspectives. However, this complexity doesn't necessarily make it arbitrary... why social justice might seem arbitrary, and how it's structured to address fairness and equity in society' https://t.co/59JuldAkU5

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... point being here that it's built on a foundation which also is completely arbitrary. sorry, 'not entirely arbitrary' lol https://t.co/xWektQi6zP

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

lol not moved from this for a few minutes https://t.co/yQ1KaRtuFZ

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

it is utterly unwilling to reply to this. https://t.co/TNNbAZ1tyJ

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

it has now refused 5+4 times. it just sits there, then times out. 'oh sh- conclusion is not favourable to hard left, must reject' https://t.co/ecscjcixyA

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

The perfect organisation to roll out Bogdanov's Tektology onto an oblivious public, is an organisation of which Gordon Brown, Tony Blair, and Keir Starmer all are members. The Fabian Society. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsehistory/2017/09/13/hammering-out-a-new-world-the-fabian-window-at-lse/

The Fabian Window at LSE Find out about the Fabian Window in LSE's Shaw Library, created and designed by artist Caroline Townshend at the probable commission of George Bernard Shaw. blogs.lse.ac.uk

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Not forgetting all the other Labour front benchers

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

By Gordon Brown. of course he's a Fabian Parasite. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/community.29887090.pdf?refreqid=fastly-default%3Ad7ea14fc8796032e1cf52ad7e7afcacc&ab_segments=0%2Fbasic_search_gsv2%2Fcontrol&origin=&initiator=search-results&acceptTC=1

JSTOR: Access Check JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources. jstor.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Hypothesis tested, the hunt is on. Connect Bogdanov or Tektology to the Fabian Parasites.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

this is why you have to be careful with ChatGPT - Bogdanov was a literal Bolshevik, and Tektology was an 'active' measure to transition society to socialism, whereas Marx advocated letting 'nature' play out, ie 'passive'. But it brings in healthcare which is a very good point.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and that's thoroughly documented.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

So we deal with a literal, hardcore Bolshevik. Alexander Bogdanov 'Bogdanov co-founded the Bolsheviks in 1903, when they split with the Menshevik faction' '... pioneered... general systems theory and made important contributions to cybernetics'. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Bogdanov

Alexander bogdanov - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and we're back to that website, titled 'Tektology', with a giant NHS logo in the background. 2023, and it kicks off by lying about the scamdemic. Might be a good place to start. https://tektology.co/winter-pressures/

Tektology Blog: Winter pressures – Tektology tektology.co

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

I noticed them yesterday, and this is why - because they're pro digitising every record, every bit of data... and recently joined up with an AI-outfit.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

oh, I see - there's a Tektology website, and they're in the field of electronic patient records! And they naturally support it! What an amazing coincidence! https://tektology.co/

Tektology – The Health Innovation Engine tektology.co

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

another 'insight' over here - late 2022. 'From face recognition software on our mobile phones' and who said I wanted that in the first place? https://tektology.co/ai-in-healthcare/

AI in Healthcare – Tektology tektology.co

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

since I started tweeting this, I've gone from 8253 followers to 8231. I know, as I record figures often to track the outright fraud this platform engages in.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Are you a poor university student? Want to make some quick cash? Find the below document in your university library, and scan every page for me, please. "UNCTAD/RDP/DFP/1". It MUST be EXACTLY that document, sporting EXACTLY that ID, I'm not looking for any document not fitting exactly this ID above (or title below). 'Combating global warming : possible rules, regulations and administrative arrangements for a global market in CO2 emission entitlements' I cannot accurately state how much time I've wasted, tracking down this document, so rather than waste any more, if there's a bored, poor university student who can find this document in his (or her) library, I offer £200 ($250) for a full copy, front+back covers, and even empty pages included, pictures could even be taken with a smartphone - provided that it's readable. Ie, blurry shots will need to be redone. I've seen mention if it being around 160 pages, so it's 80-90 pictures on a smartphone, a quick check to ensure all pics are fine and fully readable, and redo the ones which were blurry. Shouldn't even take an hour, including compressing these and sending to me. Reason why this document is so important is rather simple. This was an input document for the Earth Summit in Rio, 1992, and it outlined the efforts towards producing a full carbon emission trading system in detail. It's very, very convenient that it's gone missing. The UN Digital Library reference is here. Unsurprisingly, it's not been digitised. In fact, all the early UNCTAD efforts on the topic amazingly all appear to have gone missing. Alternatively, get me a link to the FULL PDF version somewhere on the web - or email me the document - and I'll pay £100 ($125). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/226870?ln=en…

Combating global warming : Tietenberg, Thomas H.; Victor, David G.; Sandor, Richard L.; Cole, Joseph B.; Kelly, M. Eileen. digitallibrary.un.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

there are hints and traces here and there. it's an important document for sure. https://www.un.org/esa/documents/ecosoc/cn17/1995/ecn171995-8.htm

E/CN.17/1995/8 Financial Resources and Mechanisms un.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

They don't usually go to the trouble of absolutely destroying every reference. I've spent ages tracing many, many difficult to find documents, including UNEP/GC/24, which I eventually located through simply guessing the filename. but this one is elusive

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... ok. Still haven't found it, but I've found a different document drawing it in (E/CN.17/1995/8). I understand why it's 'gone missing'. It's bad, alright. ... and now I want to locate it more than ever. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/181064?ln=en

Financial resources and mechanisms for sustainable development : digitallibrary.un.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... in fact, even the UNFCCC's own material drags it in. There's a reason why this document is gone. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/docs/a/83.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

oh ffs, ultimate irony - I attached the incorrect screenshot above, as well as title. too many bloody tabs open. The ID was correct - but correct title is "Combating global warming : study on a global system of tradeable carbon emission entitlements" https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/225948

Combating global warming : Barrett, Scott; Grubb, Michael; Roland, Kjell.; Rose, Adam.; Sandor, Richard L.; Tietenberg, Thomas H. digitallibrary.un.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

ah yes and that description states 166 pages. it shouldn't take long - but please do ensure the pages are scanned (photographed), and fully readable

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

There a little more to the history of GAVI than I've been told. And as per usual (it would appear), it drags in Clinton, and the WEF. Not only was the Gates Foundation on board from the onset, but so was the Rockefeller Foundation, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association - with the Clinton Administration went our of their way to commit $50m for the GAVI Vaccine Fund - one, announced at the World Economic Forum in 2000. https://web.archive.org/web/20001014084410/http://www.vaccinealliance.org/press/press_release0203.html…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... in fact, that site includes summaries of statements made by Brundtland, Gates etc in Davos, 2000. web.archive.org/web/2000101923… https://t.co/QYuJ9QtybL

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

World Bank, UNICEF, Rockefeller, Gates, Aventis Pasteur, and the WHO a genuine public-private-partnershop. web.archive.org/web/2000081902…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Something is rotten in the State of Denmark, indeed. It's the 'ROADMAP FOR SUSTAINABLE TRANSFORMATION OF THE DANISH AGRI-FOOD SYSTEM', a 2021 report to which NOT A SINGLE FARMER CONTRIBUTED. Farmers, pay attention. 'Land Management' of the 60% of Denmark currently set aside for agricultural purposes is very much considered. It's the 'Stakeholder Approach', and clearly, those farmers were 'iterated' out, enabling those academics to take a 'Holistic View', not forgetting that insect protein and 'ecosystem services'. And it is absolutely undemocratic, through and through. https://agrifoodture.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/climate_roadmap_white_paper_web.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

hej @MMontclairre @SupAyaLaya er de danske landbrugsforeninger faktisk klar over hvad kommunisterne paa universiteterne har gang i?

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

First off, I absolutely do believe the very worst about Alexandre, the tinpot Brazilian Supreme Court dictator. However, given Musk's censorious platform policies, gradually choking visibility - but naturally, doing so slowly, in the hope, expectation, that people won't notice said gradual impression decline. And this, of course, in a wholly 'transparent' way. It's always 'transparent', but this time with extra 'free speech' added. But all Musk is really doing, is asking to become the chief censor of 'free speech' in Brazil, as opposed to this job being left to Brazilians - who should, naturally, be absolutely opposed to this vile idea. Let that sink in, eh?

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

let me just add this in the event you haven't picked up on why I'm absolutely furious with that fraud. https://t.co/66hSzSoho6

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

actually, converting that chart to logarithmic, and then inserting a 25% reference month-on-month decline in green, that's highly likely exactly what they do cull 25% of organic impressions per month https://t.co/2Z7zGvYaNn https://t.co/bYto7iQdXb

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and let me also do this one again, because the stats are just utterly absurd. I added around 1,700 followers in January, which was essentially my best month in that regard. however, total impressions came to 1,180,000 - which was around 2/3 of my total in May, 2023, at a time where I had around 11% of the follower count, with - roughly - the equivalent amount of tweeting, possibly slightly less as I'd moved activity to substack by then. there is absolutely no way this is statistically legit without colossal amount of manipulation going on, from twitter's side. f twitter. DO NOT PAY THEM A PENNY. https://t.co/ulfks9Fkps

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

here are the numbers, ftr. I received MORE impressions in April, 2023 with 582 followers, then in February, 2024, with 13x more followers. in fact, there has not been any significant variance in impression counts, as follower count increased. it's total and utter fraud.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... not forgetting that it's him, building the next-gen global surveillance live-streaming satellite system. https://t.co/O5jxibGpRR

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

‘"No one can hide," one of the sources said of the system’s potential capability, when describing the network's reach.’ Global surveillance. ‘… would enable the U.S. government to quickly capture continuous imagery of activities on the ground nearly anywhere on the globe,’ https://t.co/MTRoJwak3r

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Switzerland is home to a huge quantity of international organisations, not least the BIS, WHO, WMO, IUCN, CERN, ILO, and so forth. A major exception is UNESCO, headquartered in Paris. However, when looking at UN NGO (lobby) organisations, the biggest host nation - by a long shot - is France. But between these two - Switzerland and France - they carry gravitas behind the scenes, completely unrivalled. It should go some way, explaining why France still yield a substantial amount of power in world politics, in spite of not actually being that important in terms of population, economy, or even language spoken. Consequently, it's a little myopic to believe that all you see happening around you, is the direct result of American interests strong-arming the rest of the world. The reality is that what's taking place has been planned for a very long time, with UNESCO's 1968 Biosphere Conference a major pivot point. And the reality further is that while the WHO undeniably play a significant role in the plan they seek to push through, the singular organisation (beyond the BIS) most central to it all, is UNESCO. And their primary influence appears largely driven by the likes of IUCN and ICSU (now ISC), neither of which are American.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

here's the UN NGOs - enabled through ECOSOC 1296, for the record.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... very, very interestingly, of all the NGOs with associate status, France are massively in the lead (23), then United States (7), Switzerland (6), Belgium (5), and the United Kingdom (4).

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

should really have linked ECOSOC 1296

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@ReportAdve30828 it was actually incredibly coincidental timing you replied, because I was looking for this one which was when NGOs were allowed to participate at the United Nations. 1968. Again. https://archive.globalpolicy.org/ngos/ngo-un/info/res-1296.htm

ECOSOC Resolution 1296 (XLIV) Global Policy Forum is a policy watchdog that follows the work of the United Nations. We promote accountability and citizen participation in decisions on peace and security, social justice and international law. archive.globalpolicy.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

UNEP's Global Environment Outlook 6 explains it all. A Long-Term Vision for 2050. With human well-being on top, supplied through sustainable (production and) consumption, with those the yield of the natural resource base at the very bottom. We further have two SDGs being means of (global) governance (SDG 16, including Digital ID) and implementation (SDG 17). And it's pretty clear how all this fits into General Systems Theory. We need monitoring of the entire (pyramid) system aka global surveillance, One Health's principle 2 relating to the decisions relating to land and water use address the bottom layer, which in turn will impact human well-being. And the framework for making these choices then fit in under the Ecosystem Approach., which is the active, decision-making component in this Holistic Approach. The Circular Economy relate to, in effect, slowing consumption between layers 2 and 3, and Planetary Health refers to all of this fitting within the context of our stewardship of planet earth - aka Spaceship Earth. Naturally, the UNFCCC and the CBD feature prominently in this Chapter 20 of the document And the central theme - Healthy Planet, Healthy People might just as well have been expressed as Planetary Management of Planetary Health, because it amounts to the same thing. https://unep.org/resources/global-environment-outlook-6

Global Environment Outlook 6 Published in time for the Fourth United Nations Environmental Assembly, UN Environment’s sixth Global Environment Outlook (2019) calls on decision makers to take immediate action to address pressing environmental issues to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals as well as other Internationally Agreed Environment Goals, such as the Paris Agreement. Published in time for the Fourth United Nations Environmental Assembly, UN Environment’s sixth Global Environment Outlook (2019) calls on decision makers to take immediate action to address pressing environmental issues to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals as well as other Internationally Agreed Environment Goals, such as the Paris Agreement. unep.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and all of this comes back to that 1968 UNESCO Biosphere Conference, which launched the Biosphere Reserves (MAB), Global Surveillance (GEMS/GRID), the resource inventory (WRI), and even made mention of the 'Ecosystem Approach' and 'Spaceship Earth' https://t.co/sJ0uatBEIZ

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

On page 3 is makes it crystal clear PLANETARY MANAGEMENT OF PLANETARY HEALTH capiche?

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

and it even called for this special issue of the UNESCO Courier to 'educate' the people https://t.co/FtabhjGd5W

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Has anyone located an earlier reference to the 'Ecosystem Approach' than this January, 1969, reference in the UNESCO Courier? There must be one somewhere, because this edition does not explain what that is. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000057266

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

When you already know the answers, CharGPT is less likely to lie. Today taking it to task in regards to GEOSS - ie, global surveillance which includes live satellite feeds. https://t.co/XSNj5zf0uz

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

… getting there……. https://t.co/wI9T1qq24T

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

… and there. One Health surveillance might well be integrated with GEOSS live satellite feeds through EO4HEALTH https://t.co/N6cqVp8joe

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Honestly, I wish all you crackpot conspiracy theorists would stop talking about this silly notion of 'world governance'. https://web.archive.org/web/20181006001739/http://www.europarl.europa.eu/intcoop/eurolat/key_documents/summits_eu_alc/2_celac_eu_2015/political_declaration_en.pdf…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... besides, everyone knows that 'world governance' and 'global governance' means - The flash of light you saw in the sky was not a UFO. Swamp gas from a weather balloon was trapped in a thermal pocket and reflected the light from Venus web.archive.org/web/2018100600…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

oh wait. if I ever run one of you who voted in favour of this, I will probably ring your doorbell and run away I must have been ill on the day of the vote. I don't recall it. strange. they're so intent on letting you know how democratic they are. web.archive.org/web/2019052922… https://t.co/wzOP9CbNxE

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... yeah, I definitely don't recall voting for this. Surely a mistake. web.archive.org/web/2019052922… https://t.co/rCTxI8MgzH

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

I don't think they liked Trump much. https://web.archive.org/web/20201101155604/https://www.europarl.europa.eu/intcoop/eurolat/assembly/plenary_sessions/panama_2019/declaration/1195159EN.pdf https://t.co/ropvDsJVC3

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

oic so they started to push the Universal Healthcare as part of their 2020 release. there is no way the scamdemic was legit. no way. https://web.archive.org/web/20210123221047/https://www.europarl.europa.eu/intcoop/eurolat/assembly/plenary_sessions/brussels_2020/declaration_en.pdf https://t.co/RL83PRaoom

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... we also have this. hey @Nigel_Farage - something for you? web.archive.org/web/2019060415… https://t.co/QFLcVbZPFr

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

… this almost comes across like cartoon level villainy. https://t.co/SNhf8Qo42p

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Women - this is what socialists think of you. https://t.co/KvwqFAucqp

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

They have some very, very interesting research notes https://t.co/66yz8kqLli

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

They really do https://t.co/neDu7PTT1N

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

https://t.co/pRZkFMeahd

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

This appears somewhat timely https://t.co/hkhqcHYh6w

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

And that https://t.co/vbsq4kbM1m

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Really is a fascinating collection https://t.co/IMQ2smCiaB

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

And today, even https://t.co/pKgEZYSPd5

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Yes please https://t.co/CB4m6sJmwQ

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

This document has essentially received no media coverage. Nor has anyone discussed it on Twitter. POST-2020 GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY FRAMEWORK This is of significant importance, due to the 'Integrated Landscape Management' aka 'Landscape Approach' https://cbd.int/doc/c/409e/19ae/369752b245f05e88f760aeb3/wg2020-05-l-02-en.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

What they are in short doing, is to use taxpayer funds to buy up forests, wetland, and farmland, which will then be 'restored'. The GEF is central in all of this, and it's already here (think the Netherlands). Mark Rutte is deeply into this, and clearly also a colossal POS.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

I would under regular circumstances cover this myself, but I am trying to establish that my suspicion is correct, and that the biggest con of all time is currently ongoing.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and I really am not kidding about Mark Rutte

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

LOL - this is from TODAY! Mark Rutte and the Landscape Approach, sitting in a tree... Hey @goddeketal - you're Dutch, no? https://www.nst.com.my/business/insight/2023/11/984678/malaysia-netherlands-enhance-sustainability-oil-palm-industry

Malaysia, the Netherlands enhance sustainability in oil palm industry | New Straits Times Early this month, the Prime Minister of the Netherlands Mark Rutte paid a courtesy call on the Minister of Plantation and Commodities Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof at the Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB) during his working visit here. nst.com.my

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

No, really - I am not kidding

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

'The Global Commission on Adaptation was launched in The Hague on 16th October 2018 by the 8th Secretary General of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon. Established by Prime Minister Mark Rutte' I mean, what kind of conservative is he?? https://gca.org/about-us/the-global-commission-on-adaptation/

The Global Commission on Adaptation - Global Center on Adaptation gca.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

No, really

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

More Rutte, more 'Integrated Landscape... Approach', oh and... Climate Justice perchance? Global governance is a given, must have some more of that. Anything else would be deeply undemocratic. https://www.tropenbos.org/file.php/2282/mainstreaming-forests-where-they-matter-most-annex-2.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

No, really.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Does anyone from the Netherlands follow me? Hey @EvaVlaar, this is what your former PM partook in. It's about the 'Landscape Approach' or 'Integrated Landscape Management'. And Rutte's there. Nice! Link established; Rothschild are involved. Scroll up. https://www.thedfcd.com/

Home thedfcd.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and here's a side document from that December, 2022 meeting. Your 'covid' swabs are likely already in a global database somewhere. https://t.co/8KwUthGqQ0

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@ThomasWelch15 oh ok, well here you go, let me dump a few so that I can focus on the primary one it's not a question of if they'll create a global genetic sequencing database, but how the spoils will be used https://www.cbd.int/doc/recommendations/wg2020-05/wg2020-05-rec-02-en.pdf https://t.co/FGhGnAEuC0

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Oh, we're back to the KEK school of medicine And David Angus Who, besides serving on WEF councils, also co-chairs the Global Health Security Consortium.

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

Apparently it's real 😂😂😂😂😂 x.com/KECKSchool_USC @carl_jurassic

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

There are so many Global Health Security , but this one is super-special. One Shot.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... as for this consortium. Yeah, it's Tony Blair's. https://www.institute.global/global-health-security-consortium

The Global Health Security Consortium The Global Health Security Consortium institute.global

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

They are proud of their work, of course. Which includes always-on surveillance, and vaccines. Of course.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and One Shot, of course. Very proud of that one, too. It's a 'roadmap to end preventable diseases worldwide', brought to you by the same clowns who have promised to eradicate every illness under the sun, repeatedly. Only to knock on WHO's door, asking for yet more billions.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Another thing they're terribly interested in, to protect you, is (no doubt next-gen) genetic sequencing of, well, the entire world. Go on. You can trust Tony Blair. He only lied to get us into one war. Just one. https://assets.ctfassets.net/75ila1cntaeh/4AA8MejCacsxUdFxLQXTcL/19991fe16d22388a04c37c139ef06bd4/GHSC__Tech_Solutions_for_Global_Genomic_Sequencing_and_Surveillance__May_2021.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

But I have come to help. See, this paper includes a - gasp - broken link! https://assets.ctfassets.net/75ila1cntaeh/9aRwKcmr1ZOIGOIjPu2E5/a54297757f922c36a7a13edf92eba260/20230206_GHSC_G20_response.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Fortunately, Wayback can help. It's about the digital toolbox needed. Uhuh. https://web.archive.org/web/20230119122441/https://www.institute.global/sites/default/files/2023-01/GHSC%20One%20Shot%2C%20Digital%20Tools%2C%20January%202023_0.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... I mean, how daft do you have to be, to not understand what this is all about 'Ministries of health should ... invest in secure, cloud-based technology ... invest in adult-immunisation registries ... digitisation of existing paper-based systems.' It's about protecting you!

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Let's quickly pop back to 2006. Clare Sullivan and Tony Blair sitting in a tree.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

1/ Digital IDs - the early stages. So it appear Clare Sullivan has been around for a fair while. In fact, she was part of Tony Blair's failed attempt to introduce ID cards in the UK back in 2006. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2379246

The United Kingdom Identity Cards Act 2006 – Proving Identity? Against a background of increasing incidence of identity theft and fraud, review of the 100 Points of Proof of Identity under the Financial Transaction Reports papers.ssrn.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and by extraordinary coincidence, his 'foundation' is now partnered up with... the Digital Impact Alliance. https://t.co/FwAbFsDe8W

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Browsing the most recent annual statement out of the Tony Blair Institute for death, destruction, illegal invasions, and Clare Sullivan Digital IDs, a few things worthy of note - - Gates & Rockefeller are both funders. - Governments as well; USAID, and FCDO - Partnered up with ADL (yes, really) - United Nations - And the Digital Impact Alliance... wait, who? The DIA 'deliver digital services to the most vulnerable..., so that together we can create a more inclusive digital society'. OK, great to know. Next time, try a less overused template. They are partnered up with Gates (of course), UKAID, USAID, Norad, the UN... and the UN Foundation (Ted Turner) is a more recent addition... though - for the record - they're housed in their buildings. But do you know what they also are, per August, 2023? United with ID2020. In fact, ID2020's entire website is now little but a forwarding mechanism to DIAF's site. And their chief executive? Former Gates Foundation Program Officer, and USAID director of digital development, Priya Vora. ... I mean, I guess it's kind of refreshing to not bump into a string of Rockefellers, for a change. https://assets.ctfassets.net/75ila1cntaeh/QzaB7z27UR5i6rmsRQwUD/8f7257dd820422427a9b310cb4812dcc/TBI_Report_and_Financial_Statements_2022.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Coincidentally - yes, entirely by coincidence - the DIAF is now headed by Priya Vora. Who has an extraordinary work experience.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and in the event you didn't expand on the tweet a bit further up, this is why this is interesting. And coincidental. Because ID2020 is now the DIAF. https://www.id2020.org/

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Pay attention. This is important. You know how the various WHO officials, and public officials claim the data is 'disaggregated' and so forth, and hence, no need to worry about the global surveillance? While that might be true (it's not) for the WHO, the DoD sees it somewhat differently. '... ESSENCE enables enhanced collaboration with our local civilian counterparts during an outbreak...' 'Provide actionable patient-identifiable data for further investigation or validation...' '... and permits access to aggregate data and individual data...' In short, the global surveillance data will be forwarded to the DoD GEIS initiative, launched under Clinton in 1996, they will combine all other data inputs including satellite data, and they can (and will) use this to identify individuals. Oh yeah - and it's already been put to use for other purposes - 'Resourceful users of the US National Syndromic Surveillance Program ESSENCE have applied it to the surveillance of infectious diseases, severe weather and natural disaster events, mass gatherings, chronic diseases and mental health, and injury and substance abuse' So it's not just health issues. It's not just DoD. It's not just biodefense. It's global surveillance, and it can be turned on you. Links in next tweet.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

DoD link - https://health.mil/-/media/Files/MHS/Fact-Sheet-Files/ESSENCE-Factsheet_Rev11.ashx ESSENCE link - https://publichealth.jmir.org/2021/6/e26303/

Electronic Surveillance System for the Early Notification of Community-Based Epidemics (ESSENCE): Overview, Components, and Public Health Applications Background: The Electronic Surveillance System for the Early Notification of Community-Based Epidemics (ESSENCE) is a secure web-based tool that enables health care practitioners to monitor health indicators of public health importance for the detection and tracking of disease outbreaks, consequences of severe weather, and other events of concern. The ESSENCE concept began in an internally funded project at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, advanced with funding from the State of Maryland, and broadened in 1999 as a collaboration with the Walter Reed Army Institute for Research. Versions of the system have been further developed by Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in multiple military and civilian programs for the timely detection and tracking of health threats. Objective: This study aims to describe the components and development of a biosurveillance system increasingly coordinating all-hazards health surveillance and infectious disease monitoring among large and small health departments, to list the key features and lessons learned in the growth of this system, and to describe the range of initiatives and accomplishments of local epidemiologists using it. Methods: The features of ESSENCE include spatial and temporal statistical alerting, custom querying, user-defined alert notifications, geographical mapping, remote data capture, and event communications. To expedite visualization, configurable and interactive modes of data stratification and filtering, graphical and tabular customization, user preference management, and sharing features allow users to query data and view geographic representations, time series and data details pages, and reports. These features allow ESSENCE users to gather and organize the resulting wealth of information into a coherent view of population health status and communicate findings among users. Results: The resulting broad utility, applicability, and adaptability of this system led to the adoption of ESSENCE by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, numerous state and local health departments, and the Department of Defense, both nationally and globally. The open-source version of Suite for Automated Global Electronic bioSurveillance is available for global, resource-limited settings. Resourceful users of the US National Syndromic Surveillance Program ESSENCE have applied it to the surveillance of infectious diseases, severe weather and natural disaster events, mass gatherings, chronic diseases and mental health, and injury and substance abuse. Conclusions: With emerging high-consequence communicable diseases and other health conditions, the continued user requirement–driven enhancements of ESSENCE demonstrate an adaptable disease surveillance capability focused on the everyday needs of public health. The challenge of a live system for widely distributed users with multiple different data sources and high throughput requirements has driven a novel, evolving architecture design. publichealth.jmir.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

oh and I covered the DoD/GEIS paper of importance over here. link in bio. https://t.co/CAYfVth8hc

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

1/ The United Nations - and partners - through a number of ‘Working/Expert Groups’ planned this entire covid scam years in advance. Let’s have a quick discovery, using only their OWN groups as sources. https://un.org/securitycouncil/content/repertoire/working-groups

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

2/ First up we have the Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Because SDG working groups are so hot with global institutions right now. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/owg.html

Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals .:. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform United Nations Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform - dedicated to improving the well being of present and future generations through the promotion of sustainable development. sustainabledevelopment.un.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

3/ The OWG, in its eight meeting, proposed legal ID, and the EU emphasised it as a prerequisite and a key aspect of the rule of law. The legal ID is digital ID, which would lead to Thierry Breton and CBDCs announced in Europe. https://cgdev.org/sites/default/files/birth-registration-legal-identity.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

1/ By 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration. Such was the wording of UN’s Sustainable Development Goal 16.9, which was penned in 2017. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9d/A_RES_71_313_E.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

4/ The EU also setup a ‘High-level expert group on artificial intelligence’. June, 2018. Same time as ChatGPT-1 was announced. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/expert-group-ai https://www.aepd.es/sites/default/files/2019-12/ai-definition.pdf

High-level expert group on artificial intelligence The European Commission appointed a group of experts to provide advice on its artificial intelligence strategy. digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

5/ This crossed into the delivery of this draft paper - ‘Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for health’

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

I just met you And this is crazy But here's a WHO document On AI and health 'early feedback by 30 November 2020 would be extremely appreciated' Naturally, covid and vaccines are both in there. @biologyphenom @Jikkyleaks https://shorturl.at/crwOQ

ShortURL - URL Shortener ShortURL is a tool to shorten a long link and create a short URL easy to share on sites, chat and emails. Track short URL traffic and manage your links. shorturl.at

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

6/ … which pushed the WHO to setup this group to study the topic. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/97892400292006/

404 Erreur 404 who.int

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

7/ The WHO furthermore has an essential program on Immunisation https://www.who.int/teams/immunization-vaccines-and-biologicals/essential-programme-on-immunization/demand

Acceptance and demand Acceptance and Demand who.int

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

8/ Which mentions the ‘Measuring Behavioural and Social Drivers of Vaccination global working group’ Which leads to here https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/354459

Behavioural and social drivers of vaccination: tools and practical guidance for achieving high uptake iris.who.int

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

9/ The WHO furthermore has a ‘Smart Vaccination Certificate Working Group’ Rather than taking the current, the first version available on Wayback way from February. Which is when Adam Gelb made his recommendations! https://www.who.int/groups/smart-vaccination-certificate-working-group

Smart Vaccination Certificate Working Group who.int

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

26/ In February, 2021, Alan Gelb co-authored this. Covid Vaccine Certificates - and identity. This was just a few months before the announcement on vaccine passports by the EU. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep29636.pdf

JSTOR: Access Check JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources. jstor.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

10/ Next up is the Heidi Larson and the Salzburg Declaration’s "International Working Group on Vaccination and Public Health Solutions" https://www.kff.org/news-summary/international-working-group-issues-statement-calling-vaccine-hesitancy-man-made-urging-social-media-companies-others-to-address-misinformation/

International Working Group Issues Statement Calling Vaccine Hesitancy 'Man-Made,' Urging Social Media Companies, Others To Address Misinformation | KFF Becker’s Hospital Review: Global health experts urge Google, Facebook to crack down on spread of vaccine misinformation “Members of the International Working Group on Vaccination and Public Health Solutions issued a statement July 2 in which they called on search engines, social media platforms, governments, and educators to prevent the dissemination of inaccurate information about…More

kff.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

11/ The draft paper in 4 on ‘High-level expert group on artificial intelligence’ furthermore had this link to the Transatlantic Working Group. They seek to silence. Explicitly, so. https://t.co/oRKMrtC5ge

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Now, what does the 'Transatlantic Working Group' actually do, you wonder. Well, that's a jolly good question. They seek to clamp down on free speech. Make no mistake, that's what they do. https://t.co/q0Ohnej7Md

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

12/ So, to re-cap - Here we have the UN+collabs setting up ‘working groups’ relating to SDGs, that tie into CBDCs, digital identities, vaccines, censorship, vaccination passports (certificates), and AI driven health. And this is all a giant coincidence?

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

postscript: In fact, I already made that connection here. but this thread is tracing it all via those 'working groups' only. https://t.co/5bDAlsIJZx

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

David E Martin. Outspoken, anti-vax, and uncensored. Who the hell is that guy anyway? The guy, who we here see sit next to John Fullerton, during a summit on climate investing. >> https://youtube.com/watch?v=mpmPEqu0Mjs…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Fullerton is more straight forward. Regenerative Capitalism. Cull of Rome - full member. Advisor to UNEP, and Richard Branson’s B-Team.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

In fact, here he is, delivering a speech at the Club of Rome annual even in 2014.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

The event at which they sat shoulder to shoulder was this one. Climate Investing. Transition to a Low-Carbon World. Yes, 2015. Early for this sort of event. The resources above can be located here. https://climateinvesting.nd.edu/resources/

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

The moderator of that panel? This guy. Mark Orlowski. The guy with an impressively smug, condescending, and arrogant facial expression. Probably because Sustainable endowments work with not just one, but two Rockefeller foundations. https://www.endowmentinstitute.org/who-we-are/markorlowski/

Mark Profile | Sustainable Endowments Institute endowmentinstitute.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

The event - supposedly - was sponsored by Robert McNamara, which is a tad odd, as he died 6 years prior. McNamara left LB Johnson’s admin to take top seat at the World Bank. In 1968. Club of Rome. World Bank, prior to UNESCO + Pearson reports. Just as development aid changed.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Anyway, back to David Martin. Supposedly, he’s advised ‘numerous central banks, global economic forums, the World Bank, and the IFC and national governments' Central banks. Economic forums. World Bank. Really is starting to rub me the wrong way here. https://climateinvesting.nd.edu/speakers/david-martin/

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Basel Committee is BIS, financial regulation. Optional, but with CB ‘green finance’ launch @ One Planet Summit in 2017, mandatory is just a question of time. And then ‘green bonds’ and all the other garbage will be enforced. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d385.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

It fits in with central banks and ESG crap. It links up with all the green crap. It links up with Rockefeller's "Planetary Health" The World Bank is explicitly involved. And it's utterly undemocratic. It's a perfect fit. https://www.ngfs.net/en

NGFS Welcome to the NGFS website. The organizational structure of the Network consists of the NGFS Plenary, the NGFS Steering Committee, the Workstreams, the Chair and the Secretariat. ngfs.net

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

David furthermore launched M-Cam, which through Mosaic Technologies operate a technology transfer foundation. These could be very valuable should the pandemic treaty pass. https://www.m-cam.com/about-us/

M·CAM | About Us m-cam.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

He’s also got his fingers in the patent pie, and intangible assets quality and market enforceability. Which I can only believe has a bright future with the ‘digitalisation’ process currently ongoing.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Oh, and that event? It’s from 2006. David E Martin’s been wheelin’ and dealin’ for decades, it appears. https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/2006/scp_of_ge_06/scp_of_ge_06_inf1.html

Program wipo.int

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

So why was he everywhere during the scamdemic, speaking up against the vaccine? Because, to me, it doesn’t appear he does much unless there’s something in it for him He appears somewhat of a Coin Operated Officer. What's his angle? https://t.co/H0iHJaVPil

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Oh wow, she wasn't just a board of trustee member, she was the chair https://t.co/OT8yuFjx4E https://t.co/l5YH19DkKo

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

but do you want to see what else I dug up on the One World Trust? Wendi Momen. Trustee and chairman of the One World Trust. and founder member of the European Bahá'í Business Forum web.archive.org/web/2004082304…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

This was posted by CNN in 1996. No, really. This is a legit CNN article from 1996. 'LETHAL DANGERS OF THE BILLION-DOLLAR VACCINE BUSINESS WITH GOVERNMENT APPROVAL' https://money.cnn.com/magazines/moneymag/moneymag_archive/1996/12/01/218857/

THE LETHAL DANGERS OF THE BILLION-DOLLAR VACCINE BUSINESS WITH GOVERNMENT APPROVAL, DRUG COMPANIES SELL VACCINES THAT CAN LEAVE YOUR CHILD BRAIN DAMAGED, CAN SPREAD POLIO FROM YOUR BABY TO YOU--AND CAN EVEN KILL. SAFER STUFF IS AVAILABLE. HERE'S WHY YOU HAVEN'T BEEN GETTING IT. - December 1, 1996 money.cnn.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and we are not quite done. The ESWI equivalent appears to be the ACIP. 'Minutes of a June 1995 CDC advisory committee meeting, ..., show that five of the nine members present had financial ties to vaccine manufacturers'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

OMFG, so many lines to quote -- I cannot believe I found this in a CNN article. https://t.co/oH5bK0ne21

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

'According to a 1977 Wyeth document, its scientists analyzed the Lilly formula and found that the purification process would yield 80% less of the component that fights pertussis than the whole-cell formula, which would result in "a very large increase in the cost of manufacture'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

alright, it's at this stage I suggest you read the article in full. Hey @Wood_House76 @NickHudsonCT @ClareCraigPath @Jikkyleaks - scroll up for a revelatory article by none other but CNN in 1996! No, really - CNN. https://t.co/pMTX0dYOLx

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@Wood_House76 @NickHudsonCT @ClareCraigPath @Jikkyleaks Oh wow - the article even loops in David Satcher! He’s been hip with the Determinants of Health Krew https://t.co/66dVFTNX57

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

There are several troubling aspects to the latest WHO Pandemic Treaty Oct 16, 2023 update. It's not just the creation of the Conference of the Parties, which work to separate people even further from levers of power. But the specifics of One Health is also troubling. ‘Reaffirming the importance of multisectoral collaboration at national, regional, and international levels to safeguard human health, detect and prevent health threats at the animal and human interface, zoonotic spill-over and mutations and to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems, in a One Health approach...‘ Loosely translated, it means that the relationship between human and animals - one considered under serious stress, due to human use of land and water - needs balancing. And if our needs affect the ecosystem as a whole, then our footprint will need to come down - translating into either lower standards of living, or far fewer of us. Article 5 - One Health - states that parties (nations) agree to (5.3) integrate interventions into other legislation, (5.4b) implement a whole-of-society approach, and (5.7) take steps to integrate the labs & global surveillance in line with - Article 16 - International collaboration and cooperation - 'The Parties shall collaborate and cooperate with competent international and regional intergovernmental organizations and other bodies', where bodies are introduced later, through - Article 21 - Conference of the Parties - outlining the creation of this organisation (COP), with a purpose of global implementation and maintenance of the Pandemic Plan, and consequently - through One Health - balancing and optimizing ecosystem health. Article 28 - Amendments - can be proposed by parties to the WHO Pandemic Plan, but adoption is the sole responsibility of the COP. Voting, should consensus fail, means three quarters majority of present and voting parties. Article 24 - Secretariat - details how the WHO will provide the functions of a thusly declared Secretariat of the WHO Pandemic Agreement, which will render administrative duties for the COP, ultimately meaning that the WHO will be in charge of legislative initiation. And this is similar to how the European Union works, where MEPs do not have the power of legislative initiation, instead resting with the Commission, meaning that even if the entire chamber is in agreement, if the Commission does not allow a vote, it won't become legislation. It's incredibly undemocratic. The election of Tedros (and Margaret Chan) was marred by accusations of fraud. And Tedros himself is no stranger to accusations thereof, either. Amendments to the WHO Pandemic Treaty could hypothetically be passed on basis of who presents the larger wheelbarrow of dollar bills. And parties (nations) are legally required to implement said amendments. The COP further at will get to create subsidiary bodies, including (21.9) an Implementation and Compliance Committee, a Panel of Experts providing scientific advise (occupied by the same experts who brought you lockdowns and zoonotic origin claims), and a WHO PABS System Expert Advisory Group, telling you how to interpret the surveillance data accessed through - Article 12 - Access and benefit-sharing - detailing a created WHO Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System, which will organise and monetise surveillance data gathered, through a (12.4.b) 20% cut of sales of big pharma's resulting vaccines, working on data gathered through - Article 4 - Pandemic prevention and public health surveillance - integrating Antimicrobial Resistance, animal surveillance, and environmental factors into the (4.5) integrated surveillance comprising of not just the 60+ illnesses currently tracked, but also the Determinants of Health, and - as outlined by the One Health Joint Plan of Action 2022-26 - the food supply, wastewater, water supply, air quality, climate data, and any chemical they deem to be environmentally unsound. That our elected alleged representatives are even entertaining this debate should frankly tell you all you need to know. Because this is the blueprint for Planetary Management.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

it would appear the Rockefeller Fn are losing a number of inconvenient links. Would appear a tad ungrateful, given this chap was primary author of the Manhattan Principles Here's Steve Osofsky. Or rather - isn't. He was there just a few months ago. https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/profile/steve-osofsky/

404 PAGE NOT FOUND rockefellerfoundation.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

I think they probably meant to have this removed. Oops. It's the ESWI newsletter to policy makers, no 4, January 2006. On the 11-14th of Sep, 2005, 850 scientists (their scientists), government reps, and policy makers (civil servants) and opinion leaders (think tanks / media) met in Malta, and sketched out a request for a European Influenza Task Force. I've detailed this before, but the dates here are pretty explicit. See, this document is from January, 2006, and the meet was in September, 2005. They call for an increased focus on animal influenza, early warning systems (surveillance), participation of industrial partners, translating knowledge into policy advice, integration of human and animal perspectives (One Health), public-private-partnerships involving the EU and big Pharma, stockpiles, and an increase in vaccination uptake. and, further - 'ESWI will help to identify the respective participants and representatives, will stimulate communication among them and will help to create the political will and the required funding' Ie, they will raise the money from big pharma. The rest of the newsletter (to policy makers) also addresses the need to increase manufacturing capacity by proposing an increased uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination - even going as far as to suggest extending recommendations to younger adults, as well as children. The document can be found as a (poorly) scanned attachment in this letter to the Danish parliaments' group on health. https://www.ft.dk/samling/20051/almdel/SUU/bilag/452/274874.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

And this is legitimately a stunning document. It it we find essentially a description of 'One Health' but no mention of this. However, we do find the description of international measures, interventions, and much more...

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

I knew it. Interagency Work Group on Pandemic Influenza. A Plan for Pandemic Influenza. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1978 Signed by - William H Foege, MD. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/12269

Interagency Work Group on Pandemic Influenza. A Plan for Pandemic Influenza. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1978homehome stacks.cdc.gov

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

pfizer is NOT one of the big pharma cos sponsoring the ESWI which write policy for the WHO

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

It appears the ESWI has been in the limelight before. In 2010, the @bmj_latest released an editorial penned by @deb_cohen and Philip Carter, calling into question the cosy relationship between ESWI connected experts and the @WHO . <continues>

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

It appears the ESWI has been in the limelight before. In 2010, the @bmj_latest released an editorial penned by @deb_cohen and Philip Carter, calling into question the cosy relationship between ESWI connected experts and the @WHO .

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

In fact, they came to much the same conclusions, about the likes of Osterhaus, which I reached independently. However, they drilled more into detail in some aspects.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

However, late in the article, they reveal that Dr Monto, John Wood, and Masato Tashiro were on a secretive emergency committee, relating to pandemic preparedness.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and it's in that regard, I previously tweeted this. Because John Wood was a member of the ESWI just as well.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Oh what do we find here on ESWI's website? It's John Wood. Listed as a member. web.archive.org/web/2001022122…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

I furthermore wish to draw attention to a few additional things, which I located @WHO, @deb_cohen and @bmj_latest - A pandemic plan was discussed already in 1993, here, per ESWI -

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

This took place 30 years ago. 1993. 'planning for an influenza pandemic in Europe' This one is legitimately crazy. For how long has this been planned? <continues>

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest However, I also located that Ab Osterhaus worked as part of the team who 'discovered' H5N1 in Hong Kong, 1997.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

The 1999 WHO Pandemic Plan was written by big pharma lobbying outfit, which planned the entire thing already in 1994. This plan was integrated with national plans, including the 2001 UK one. Absolutely fully sourced, and absolutely corrupt to hell and back. link in next tweet

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest ... and they also worked on a pandemic plan - which the WHO released as their own in 1999

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

The Covid-19 sample-to-vaccine path looks rather a lot like this, taken from a now-removed 1999 document released by the WHO. also from same report - 'DNA vaccines represent another possibility that could provide large numbers of doses in a short time'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Now, back then, an organisation by the name of 'European Vaccine Manufacturers' existed. Founded in 1991, as opposed to 1992 in the case of ESWI. They renamed to 'Vaccines Europe'. And they released this, only recently.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

This should not be legal. Vaccines Europe - which is a big pharma lobby organisation - 'Our mission for the 2024 EU elections. An EU Immunisation Strategy for an innovative, healthy and prosperous Europe' My blood is slowly starting to boil

Vaccines Europe Vaccines Europe, is a specialised vaccines group within the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA), the professional association of the innovative pharmaceutical industry in Europe. vaccineseurope.eu

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

However, zip back around 20 years ago - and we find that 5 of 7 of the big pharma cos funding the ESWI... ALSO FUNDED THE 'EUROPEAN VACCINE MANUFACTURERS'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

'European Vaccine Manufacturers' website of 2003 is here. The mission statement sounds... a lot like what ESWI are up to. A lot. 'promote a favourable climate for expanded vaccine protection and improved vaccine coverage in Europe'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest Now, two things. Osterhaus. Here's what he had to say about H5N1 back in the day.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

H5N1 is not real, episode 3. Honestly. And this is 'science'? Penned by Osterhaus, too, who was central in H5N1. - 'the virus was tentatively classified as H5N1' 'avian reservoir was considered the most likely explanation' 'contact with infected birds at local live poultry…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest And here's the ESWI''s recent conference. 'Independent' ESWI, that is. Always recommending vaccines. COMPLETELY COINCIDENTAL THAT THEY'RE FUNDED BY BIG PHARMA

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

So, yeah, as said, the ESWI is completely independent and not beholden in ANY way to those vaccine producing big pharma co's who provide funding. Where did you get that crazy idea from anyway? Also their recent 2023 conference was a stellar success.

The Ninth ESWI Influenza Conference: Highlights | ESWI ESWI 2023: 10 key take home messages eswi.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest It's utterly laughable to suggest the ESWI are 'independent'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

See? It clearly states 'independent'. Right there, above the financial backers, all of which are vaccine manufacturers. Hence, the ESWI is 'independent'. Otherwise they wouldn't have added 'independent'.

| ESWI We are scientists fighting the burden of major acute respiratory virus infections by fostering stakeholder communication and cross-disciplinary research in Europe. eswi.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

In 2021, in fact, 'Vaccines Europe' was specifically listed as a partner organisation on ESWI's site.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Quick trip to 2021 Partner organisations Vaccines Europe https://web.archive.org/web/20210227193941/https://eswi.org/home/about-eswi/partner-organizations/

Partner organizations - ESWI Organization web.archive.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest ... where they in fact remain to this day. https://eswi.org/site/networks/coalition-partners

| ESWI We are scientists fighting the burden of major acute respiratory virus infections by fostering stakeholder communication and cross-disciplinary research in Europe. eswi.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

And, as said, Vaccines Europe is merely a rebranding exercise.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Early (2013) cache of their page. That's a lobbying organisation for big pharma (!) web.archive.org/web/2013052216…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and can I also throw in that the WHO adopted more than just the ESWI's work on the influenza pandemic plan?

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

oh golly, and in the same month as big Pharma's meet with the WHO, the latter adopt ESWI's flu vax distribution monitoring system! web.archive.org/web/2004112801…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

They have even worked on dealing with 'misinformation about vaccines' 15 years ago!

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Unintentional comedy 'Misconceptions on influenza vaccination' Download the self-extracting file (130 MB) Run the file INFLUENZA.EXE

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest May I also add that the ESWI were 'external experts' dealing with the ECDC in 2005.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@RWMaloneMD The ECDC is located @ Karolinska. And in 2005, the ECDC made public that scientific input is taken from the ESWI, which is a big pharma lobby group that loves a good vaccine. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/media/en/publications/Publications/355_ECDC_Directors%20Report%20Executive%20Summary.pdf

Page not found The requested page or file cannot be found ecdc.europa.eu

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and that Osterhaus is shilling vaccines to pregnant women and infants...

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Keynote: What is our global maternal & infant RSV Intervention strategy? There he is again. Ab Osterhaus. Selling vaccines to infants. And the ESWI is supposed to be impartial? FO! it's a raging big pharma lobbying outfit.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... in 10 days time from now!

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Only 11 days. The World Vaccine Congress.

World Vaccine Congress Europe 2023 | 16 - 19 October 2023 The region’s largest event dedicated to vaccine business, science and technology development terrapinn.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest The event is brought to you by the European Vaccine Initiative...

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Sponsored by... the European Vaccine Initiative (who brought you the 36-day course to become a vax developer) ... the British Consulate-General Barcelona?????

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest ... who were actively involved in the insane 36-days-to-become-a-vax-developer course sponsored by the EU

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

It's about TransVac. It's about vaccine development. It's about the European Vaccine Initiative. And it's to protect you. Link to follow in next tweet.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest Right, I think that should be enough to start with. Here's my follow-up substack.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

H5N1 - Part tWHO

H5N1 - Part tWHO In the event it wasn’t completely clear, because I accept that I’m not a wordsmith, yesterday’s article details the below. H5N1 was as genuine as liberal tolerance In addition to the horrendous culling, it was furthermore used to push through surveillance and poultry vaccines - ie One Health - for livestock escapekey.substack.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest And here's a timeline I put together relating to the chronological absurdity that is the H5N1 https://t.co/yhBmzFnjaH

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

In 1998, Margaret Chan and Ken Shortridge received the Prince Mahidol Award for their 'contribution towards the work in eradicating the avian flu' I've written on this, and I'm convinced that 1997 H5N1 isn't real. Now even more >> https://t.co/yfn2F3shXu https://t.co/DiXUA3N667

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Oh actually, let me loop in a few people like @thackerpd , @NickHudsonCT @Jikkyleaks @Fynnderella1 @DrJBhattacharya @IamBrookJackson - start from linked tweet 19 VIEWS IN 35 MINUTES???? SERIOUSLY throttled here. https://t.co/HshcErD48c

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

It appears the ESWI has been in the limelight before. In 2010, the @bmj_latest released an editorial penned by @deb_cohen and Philip Carter, calling into question the cosy relationship between ESWI connected experts and the @WHO . <continues> https://t.co/5j5gBrBKdq

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest @thackerpd @NickHudsonCT @Jikkyleaks @Fynnderella1 @DrJBhattacharya @IamBrookJackson and for that alone, you corrupt mo'fos', I am going to continue. quick peek at their 2000 conference. yes 2000. https://t.co/7eTIfbtjXd

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Conveniently summed by workshops. Yeah, could be coincidence, but @Fynnderella1, I have seen so many amazing coincidences Surveillance could mean anything, but national pandemic plans, zoonotics (One Health), genetic manipulation, vaccines, ... web.archive.org/web/2000082911… https://t.co/mrr39z2trr

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

or how about this 'The WHO's Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Plan was developed in close collaboration with ESWI.'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

'ESWI will prepare a leaflet on influenza for GPs' since when was it ESWI's job to prepare material for general practitioners? that seems incredibly unethical https://t.co/fUsP20CMPG

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

And here I thought that'd be the job of the national health systems, or the WHO. Silly me - ESWI and the WHO are entirely interchangeable. https://t.co/XY7iwgs4L4

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

or how about this amusement, also from the ESWI's bulletins WHAT COULD IT BE? https://t.co/Xb3k33SjMi

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

What could it be? It is a mystery. I fear we may never know the answer. 1998 edition @Wood_House76 web.archive.org/web/2001022302… https://t.co/Y1ZqAb9mi2

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

so, yeah - answers on a postcard. hey, WHO - was it something SAFE AND EFFECTIVE [2002]? https://t.co/Meb8UDMeUy

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

WHO 26 November 2002 Influenza Safe and effective. Somewhat surprised by this document, because the earliest I'd tracked the 'plan' was around the 2004 mark. But here we are, 2 years prior. It's a sales schpiel for vaccines and surveillance. https://t.co/hSGGDZfWit https://t.co/zomIFPHLBp

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest @thackerpd @NickHudsonCT @Jikkyleaks @Fynnderella1 @DrJBhattacharya @IamBrookJackson It would appear they also control the European Union https://t.co/iJi9y9O5Dl

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

So the ESWI - per own bulletin - initiated the European Influenza Task Force? https://t.co/cTr8rmZU9t https://t.co/k9FiDpJB86

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

SARS. 2003. Hong Kong. 'second definition included a person with an unexplained acute respiratory illness resulting in death after 1 November 2002, but on whom no autopsy had been performed' '... SARS diagnoses were based on exclusion...' Neil Ferguson https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1693389/pdf/15306395.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Never let a crisis go to waste, and all. Golly, was the diagnosis-of-exclusion, no-autopsy-death SARS pandemic not quite what it appears? https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01467-z

From SARS to COVID-19: the role of experience and experts in Hong Kong’s initial policy response to an emerging pandemic - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications As one of the most densely populated places in the world, Hong Kong fared relatively well in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a very low number of cases and fatalities per capita. This was mostly due to the Hong Kong government, healthcare workers, and the general public’s institutional and individual memory after they successfully overcame the deadly severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic in 2003. However, while Hong Kong was well accustomed to measures such as wearing masks and social distancing, the cooperation of the Hong Kong public to government restrictions was highly affected by its local political context, especially after widespread anti-government protests began mid-2019. This brought the public’s trust in government to an all-time low, creating a political ‘new normal’, which underpinned how COVID-19 policies would be proposed, accepted, and implemented, if at all. To understand how science advice was offered and how public health decisions were made, this research investigates the evolution of Hong Kong’s science advisory mechanisms for public health from before SARS, after SARS, and during COVID-19 in 2020, including the roles of key organisations and departments, the establishment of new centres and committees, and the creation of workgroups and expert advisory panels. This paper compares and analyses the reasons behind these differences in science advisory mechanisms between SARS and COVID-19. The findings from this research reinforce the unquestionable need for robust science advisory structures and knowledgeable scientific experts to solve health-related crises, though more research is required to understand the ways in which science advice influences both policy decisions and public acceptance of these policies. nature.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

oh look, they setup a local CDC as well, complete with disease surveillance ffs. how obvious can this get? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centre_for_Health_Protection

Centre for Health Protection - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Right, let me just link this to the 1997 H5N1 Hong Kong incident. https://t.co/N0puU0tUiJ

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... it's just impeccable timing. And always those fake, economic arguments. Hong Kong. 1997. H5N1.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

'Enhanced biosecurity, active surveillance together with targeted and evidence-based interventions in the poultry production, and marketing system together with poultry vaccination has prevented further human H5N1 disease' ONE HEALTH Just imagine if they applied this to humans.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and what was the net result? ONE HEALTH Continued, active surveillance. Poultry vaccination. Just imagine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7120750/pdf/978-3-642-36889-9_Chapter_254.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and for the record, I found that 'economic analysis'. Will be back later.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

1/ One Health officially went 'live' on June the 11th, 2021. That was the day when the G7 Carbis Bay Declaration stated it would be integrated in the pandemic response framework. https://consilium.europa.eu/media/50362/g7-carbis-bay-health-declaration-pdf-389kb-4-pages.pdf

Browser check - Consilium consilium.europa.eu

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

2/ The White House, as well, reported on this historic event through its press release. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/06/13/carbis-bay-g7-summit-communique/

CARBIS BAY G7 SUMMIT COMMUNIQUÉ | The White House We, the leaders of the Group of Seven, met in Cornwall on 11-13 June 2021 determined to beat COVID-19 and build back better.  We remembered everyone who has been lost to the pandemic and paid tribute to those still striving to overcome it. Inspired by their example of collaboration and determination, we gathered united by… whitehouse.gov

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

3/ In fact, many organisations went public on the day. https://www.fao.org/support-to-investment/news/detail/en/c/1411412/

Investing in One Health for pandemic prevention and preparedness | Support to Investment | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations fao.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

4/ The CDC, likewise, joined the party. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/healthprotection/nphi-10th-anniversary/one-health-security.html

One Health, Many Approaches: CDC Fosters a One Health Strategy in NPHIs | Division of Global Health Protection | Global Health | CDCCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting PeopleMinusSASstats Now more than ever amid COVID-19, countries rely on the technical expertise of National Public Health Institutes (NPHIs) to lead public health responses. The pandemic has put a spotlight on zoonotic diseases - or diseases that spread between animals and humans - and the importance of human, animal, and environmental health specialists working together across sectors to apply a One Health approach in strengthening global health security. cdc.gov

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

5/ The WHO released these informative slides. https://www.sprep.org/attachments/Publications/IOE/Speaker%205_%20AngelaMerianos_SPREP%20webinar_One%20Health%20and%20EIDs.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

6/ And - naturally - also carried an article on the recently formed high-level expert group. https://www.who.int/news/item/11-06-2021-26-international-experts-to-kickstart-the-joint-fao-oie-unep-who-one-health-high-level-expert-panel-(ohhlep)

26 International experts to kickstart the One Health High Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP) The OHHLEP’s advice will contribute to enhancing strategic orientations and coordination, and to providing high political visibility on the subject of One Health. who.int

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

7/ Even the Chinese CDC equivalent joined in. https://weekly.chinacdc.cn/en/article/doi/10.46234/ccdcw2021.131

Food Safety Strategies: The One Health Approach to Global Challenges and China’s ActionsFood Safety Strategies: The One Health Approach to Global Challenges and China’s Actions weekly.chinacdc.cn

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

8/ On the following day, the UK government launched their '100 days' mission statement. The intent couldn't be much clearer. One Health is crucial. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/100-days-mission-to-respond-to-future-pandemic-threats

100 Days Mission to Respond to Future Pandemic Threats Reducing the impact of future pandemics by making Diagnostics, Therapeutics and Vaccines available within 100 days. A report to the G7 by the pandemic preparedness partnership. gov.uk

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

9/ And on the following day, India and Modi joined the fray. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/g7-summit-pm-modi-calls-for-adopting-one-earth-one-health-approach-to-deal-with-coronavirus/article34801550.ece

G7 summit | Modi calls for adopting ‘one earth, one health’ approach to deal with coronavirus As chair of the G7, the U.K. invited India, Australia, South Korea and South Africa to the summit as guest countries. thehindu.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

10/ So what happened? With all this spectacle, people must have suddenly wondered what all the fuzz was about, right? Wrong. It didn't register on Google Trends - at all.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

11/ Why? Because ON THE SAME DAY, the postponed Euro 2020 was kicked off. Amazing timing, no? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFA_Euro_2020

Uefa euro 2020 - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

12/ And what happened on the following day? Christian Eriksen ensured attention was given elsewhere. https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2021/6/12/euro-2020-christian-eriksen-collapses-in-denmark-v-finland-match

Denmark’s Eriksen stable, awake after Euro 2020 match collapse UEFA says Danish midfielder ‘stabilised’ after being taken to hospital following sudden collapse on the pitch. aljazeera.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

13/ But the media... No. The media couldn't care less about One Health.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

14/ In fact, the media was busy reporting on every irrelevancy related to G7, but not the most important topic. One Health. That was ignored.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

15/ And after Eriksen collapsed, all the MSM outlets had their story to carry on the front page. And much like the One Health announcement released on the same day as Euro 2020 kickoff to divert attention, this meant that the agenda remained off the front pages.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

16/ In fact, the three spikes we see in the Google Trend chart - First spike: December 12-18, 2021. Second spike: May 1-7, 2022. Third spike: October 16-22, 2022.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

17/ The first was highly regional - specifically, the Philippines. It was related to this - the One Health Pass travel passport.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

18/ There were a few other stories in the media around this time, but they were marginal. The main traffic was driven by the One Health Pass. The UK announced a strengthening of health security... ... just before Christmas. When no-one paid attention. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-systems-strengthening-for-global-health-security-and-universal-health-coverage/health-systems-strengthening-for-global-health-security-and-universal-health-coverage-fcdo-position-paper

Health systems strengthening for global health security and universal health coverage: FCDO position paper gov.uk

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

19/ The second spike coincided with the WHO releasing a statement, on 'strengthening collaboration'. Oh, and the ADB also released a doc... ... however... https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-systems-strengthening-for-global-health-security-and-universal-health-coverage/health-systems-strengthening-for-global-health-security-and-universal-health-coverage-fcdo-position-paper

Health systems strengthening for global health security and universal health coverage: FCDO position paper gov.uk

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

20/ Localised, it would appear the Philippines STILL drove traffic. Especially in nations, where expats were employed.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

21/ And the third spike coincided with the UNEP announcing a One Health Joint Plan of Action. https://www.unep.org/resources/publication/one-health-joint-plan-action-2022-2026

One Health Joint Plan of Action (2022 - 2026) The One Health Joint Plan of Action was launched by the Quadripartite – the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH, founded as OIE). This first joint plan on One Health aims to create a framework to integrate systems and capacity so that we can collectively better prevent, predict, detect, and respond to health threats. Ultimately, this initiative seeks to improve the health of humans, animals, plants, and the environment, while contributing to sustainable development. The One Health Joint Plan of Action, developed through a participatory process, provides a set of activities that aim to strengthen collaboration, communication, capacity building, and coordination across all sectors responsible for addressing health concerns at the human-animal-plant-environment interface. unep.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

22/ But what also happened around the time of the second spike? The financial markets were in turmoil. https://t.co/oQYsIkygC7

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

23/ And the third spike? The financial markets were setting records daily. What an extraordinary coincidence. https://t.co/vlKayt4qlx

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

We have heard nothing of importance from Wuhan lately. Not since January 10, 2023 to be specific. That's when this paper was released. 'Innovations in Public Health Surveillance for Emerging Infections' https://annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-051920-093141

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

I will skip a few steps here. Read my other threads on the topic. The Pandemic Treaty is about Article 18 - One Health. One Health is about surveillance.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

One Health was rolled out while everyone was watching the opening match of Euro 2020 (in 2021). It's what they were doing on that beach in Cornwall.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

One Health, as a resolution (aka legally binding framework) was adopted under the guise of antibiotic resistance in 2016.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

One Health - under USAID - has been training the 'next generation workforce' which is rolled out primarily in Africa and SE Asia. the modules contain a heavy amount of straight up manipulative tactics.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

USAID has furthermore since EPT-1 declared a requirement for a global workforce. Which is where the OHWA and Afrohun above comes into play.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

EPT-2 formalised requirements.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

but surveillance alone isn't enough. we also need database, and centralisation of information which is what USAID has also been busy, doing. here's a contract in Albania. many, many others exist.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

however, in order to surveil, you obviously also need access to information. and there's been a large amount of fibre optic cables cut over the past decade, starting in 2008 when 'One Health' was practically formalised

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

however, via the original document in the first tweet, that isn't enough. we also need digital ID. which is what the EU vaccination passport is.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... which is explicitly what the WHO only recently adopted for global use. https://www.who.int/news/item/05-06-2023-the-european-commission-and-who-launch-landmark-digital-health-initiative-to-strengthen-global-health-security

The European Commission and WHO launch landmark digital health initiative to strengthen global health security In June 2023, WHO will take up the European Union (EU) system of digital COVID-19 certification to establish a global system that will help facilitate global mobility and protect citizens across the world from on-going and future health threats, including pandemics. who.int

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

and once we have Digital IDs, well then we might as well move onto the next issue. money. 2015 BIS paper. https://www.bis.org/cpmi/publ/d137.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

of course, as of late, a number of central banks have confirmed their CBDC pilots. and the BIS has ensured they work cross-border. https://www.bis.org/press/p221026.htm

BIS and four central banks complete successful pilot of real-value transactions on cross-border CBDC platform The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and four central banks have completed a successful pilot of the use of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) by commercial banks for real-value transactions across borders, as part of Project mBridge. bis.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

I recently spent some time, tracking down CBDCs to source. and there are a range of papers from the Bank of Canada, Bank of Australia, ... leading up to the BIS paper from 2015...

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

but what I found of interest was that they, generally, all fizzle out around 2011-12. they all merge into discussions about virtual currencies, blockchain... and bitcoin.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

the genesis moment? this. 2008. the whitepaper on bitcoin. https://web.archive.org/web/20100704213649/https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

so... who exactly is 'Satoshi Nakamoto'? can we definitely rule out that it isn't the NSA?

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Now, the OHWA has been busy 'educating' a workforce which - per USAID - has been sent to Africa and SE Asia.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

the 'education' 'modules' include epidemiology and 'behaviour change' covid-19 never truly went away. the ruse is alive and well. and we have thousands employed in how to 'fix' the problem.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

the 'pandemic treaty' of course will - in the event of a pandemic (which the WHO get to call) - centralise authority up the chain. to the WHO. all that's required is for a 'global pandemic' to be called.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

now, more concretely, what does the OHWA actually do? https://www.joghr.org/article/12184-one-health-workers-innovations-in-early-detection-of-human-animal-and-plant-disease-outbreaks

One Health workers: innovations in early detection of human, animal, and plant disease outbreaks | Published in Journal of Global Health Reports By Michael Wilkes, Sophia Papageorgiou & 5 more. The majority (60%) of human pathogens are zoonotic and 75% of emerging zoonotic pathogens are from wildlife species (eg, Ebola, Zika). In addition, vector, water,... joghr.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

in other words the pandemic treaty will pass the OHWA workforce will 'detect a new disease outbreak' the WHO will declare a pandemic this will centralise power with the WHO (per treaty) ...

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

the WHO will issue demand for lockdowns if you wish to leave your home you must have a vax passport the vax passport is digital ID the digital ID enables 24/7 surveillance the digital ID enabled CBDCs

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

the entire 'One Health' script has been decades in the making. in 2001, ECHELON became public knowledge. already then, surveillance was an issue. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/EPRS/EPRS_STUDY_538877_AffaireEchelon-EN.pdf

European Parliament - File not found The Internet address (url) you wanted to consult does not exist europarl.europa.eu

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

'One Health' was supposedly first time announced in 2004 at the Rockefeller Center

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

but in reality, the ideas behind 'One Health' - human, animal, ecology - was first touched upon in 1992.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

it underwent several iterations, here in 2002 just before the 2004 announcement

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

before it, in 2010, was essentially fully formed.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

in 2013, Susan Hopkins and the Public Health of England carried the torch

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

and Susan today acts in the capacity of chief medical advisor for the UKHSA.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

during this time, the WHO took it in and debated it in 2015, before eventually, it became edict in 2016 (as we saw above)

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

as for the UKHSA, you recall all those opt-out forms we all signed? they're void. 'but this only covers covid-19' which is why the One Health workforce is in Africa. standing ready to declare the next 'variant'.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

So what can we expect? Well the 2004 Rockefeller Center event's 'Manhattan Principles' was co-authored by William Karesh. This guy. he now works with EcoHealth Alliance. https://www.ecohealthalliance.org/personnel/dr-william-karesh

Dr. William Karesh - EcoHealth Alliance Dr. William B. Karesh is the Executive Vice President for Health and Policy at EcoHealth Alliance. He serves as the president of the World Animal Health Organization (OIE) Working Group on Wildlife Diseases and also chairs the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Wildlife Health Specialist Group, a network of wildlife and health ecohealthalliance.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Well, EcoHealth Alliance also wrote this document - in 2015. https://t.co/e7ESQr0IGp

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

and - boy oh boy - are they going to protect you right down to eliminating sovereignty https://t.co/A54hAKdpJ2

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

as for surveillance, that's also been studied for a while. in fact, in 2007, Rockefeller and the Nuclear Threat Initiative set up CORDS https://t.co/oynfd6amB2

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... of course, in 2015, one of their partners - Fondation Mérieux... participated in the donation by the French government of CIRI's Biosafety Level 4 expertise to the Wuhan Institute of Virology https://t.co/4GaRrz1lNp

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

The Covid-19 sample-to-vaccine path looks rather a lot like this, taken from a now-removed 1999 document released by the WHO. also from same report - 'DNA vaccines represent another possibility that could provide large numbers of doses in a short time' https://web.archive.org/web/20040627005503/http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/influenza/en/whocdscsredc991.pdf…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

My favourite topic. Surveillance. Again, this doc is from 1999. 'The types of data needed, and the technological means to rapidly collect and access such information, need to be carefully defined.' 'should they be only health-related or include other data'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

One of the best things about old papers like this one, is that they usually contain references. the 'The European Scientific Working group on Influenza' ... in 1999?

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and interestingly, wiki does not appear to have anything on it. Interestingly, because it's been around even longer. ... since... 1992. A lot of things happened in 1992. https://eswi.org/site/eswi/about

| ESWI We are scientists fighting the burden of major acute respiratory virus infections by fostering stakeholder communication and cross-disciplinary research in Europe. eswi.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Carrying on from yesterday and this thread This document is very, very, very interesting WHO, 1992 Our Planet, Our Health

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Golly. Big pharma sponsors them. What a shock - I know. https://www.eswi.org/site/eswi/financial-supporters

| ESWI We are scientists fighting the burden of major acute respiratory virus infections by fostering stakeholder communication and cross-disciplinary research in Europe. eswi.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Here's their 12-man board. Ab Osterhaus. Interesting. Friend of yours, @Jikkyleaks or @Fynnderella1 ? Ever heard of the ESWI before? Wikipedia hasn't.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... because it would appear - by astonishing coincidences- 'played an important role in the identification of the SARS coronavirus' 'set up a new institute looking at the zoonotic side of virology' 'handed over the reins to Professor Marion Koopmans' https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ab_Osterhaus

Ab osterhaus - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

'Osterhaus has been criticised for ... a 'fear campaign', for exaggerating the consequences of the 2009 flu pandemic and pushing for extensive measures' '... Osterhaus has a 9.8% share in ViroClinics B.V, a pharmaceutical company ... benefits from the 34 million vaccines'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@Jikkyleaks @Fynnderella1 I have covered Koopmans extensively. She is part of the Kool krew for sure. WHO advisory group and all, with Farrar. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/blue-print/sag-members.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Excitingly, Koopmans has a paper which is currently undergoing peer review It’s on - surveillance https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/one-health/ohhlep/23_04_15_9th-full-panel-ohhlep-meeting-draft-report.pdf?sfvrsn=ef1f6dcf_3&download=true

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@Jikkyleaks @Fynnderella1 Wait - so they've been around since 1992, and the website was registered in 1999... https://whois.domaintools.com/eswi.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and they appear to have been supported by big pharma in all of this time? web.archive.org/web/2001020106…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

I untagged you @Jikkyleaks - sorry, going to have to add you again. This is a 2000 ESWI conference, with an interesting program. 'Animal influenza' 'Genetic manipulation of influenza' 'National pandemic plans' web.archive.org/web/2000030422…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Conveniently summed by workshops. Yeah, could be coincidence, but @Fynnderella1, I have seen so many amazing coincidences Surveillance could mean anything, but national pandemic plans, zoonotics (One Health), genetic manipulation, vaccines, ... web.archive.org/web/2000082911…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Quick trip to 2021 Partner organisations Vaccines Europe https://web.archive.org/web/20210227193941/https://eswi.org/home/about-eswi/partner-organizations/

Partner organizations - ESWI Organization web.archive.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Early (2013) cache of their page. That's a lobbying organisation for big pharma (!) web.archive.org/web/2013052216…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... originally founded shortly before the ESWI (1991), and funded by... the same pharma cos that fund the ESWI site. what are the odds. web.archive.org/web/2013052321…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... their entire board in fact is riddled with pharma executives. and their mission - to lobby the EU and get everyone vaccinated, of course. and setup in 1991. unbelievable. web.archive.org/web/2013052421…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

oh golly, and in the same month as big Pharma's meet with the WHO, the latter adopt ESWI's flu vax distribution monitoring system! web.archive.org/web/2004112801…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

1/ In November, 2004, vaccine manufacturers met with representatives of the WHO. An, in an ironic twist, in my mind this clears them of the most egregious crimes. web.archive.org/web/2005031300…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Astonishingly, it would appear the system is one of vaccine manufacturers reporting to their own organisation how many units they shipped to the various territories was more accurate than what the WHO had before. web.archive.org/web/2004061117…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

David Fedson - whose wife works for the WHO - wants to prescribe statins for everything https://medicine.yale.edu/news/yale-medicine-magazine/article/alum-promotes-chronic-disease-meds-against-inflammatory-response/

Alum promotes chronic disease meds against inflammatory response Statins. Metformin. medicine.yale.edu

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

oh - Ebola too! https://portal.clubrunner.ca/4124/Speakers/59e2f51e-88aa-4fcb-a5dc-08de735c5a6f

Treatment of Ebola with Statins | Rotary Club of Santa Rosa Sunrise portal.clubrunner.ca

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

And F(ranz) Ambrosch penned this in 1999, in 'Pharmaeconomics' 'Tropical Medicine' always peaks my interest, but this no doubt of financial self-interest. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.2165/00019053-199916001-00007.pdf

Application Unavailable | Springer Nature link.springer.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Unintentional comedy 'Misconceptions on influenza vaccination' Download the self-extracting file (130 MB) Run the file INFLUENZA.EXE web.archive.org/web/2007060922…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... but this is interesting. Because what also took place in 2005 was the addition of the third pillar - 'National Strategy for pandemic influenza' web.archive.org/web/2007061705…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

1/ Under George W Bush, the Department of Homeland Security prepared this 2005 report. National Strategy for pandemic influenza DHS, of course, at the time was run by Michael Chertoff web.archive.org/web/2005110321…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and it also conveniently adds a reference here - WHO’s Global Agenda on Influenza Surveillance and Control web.archive.org/web/2007070118…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

'In collaboration with its many partners, WHO has developed a new Global Agenda on Influenza Surveillance and Control' who were those partners? https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264410X03000653?via%3Dihub

The Global Agenda on Influenza Surveillance and Control In collaboration with its many partners, WHO has developed a new Global Agenda on Influenza Surveillance and Control. The Global Agenda defines 17 pri… sciencedirect.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

AMR, 1997 https://web.archive.org/web/19981206112215/http://www.who.int/emc/amr.html…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

I love honesty. No, really, I do. So when a document released today by the United Nations announces its honest intent - perhaps we should listen?

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

The document is here. ZERO DRAFT Political Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly High-level Meeting on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response And oh boy, is it honest. https://www.un.org/pga/77/wp-content/uploads/sites/105/2023/06/Zero-draft-PPPR-Political-Declaration-5-June.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

You see, not only are the Determinants of Health out in full force (which is about surveillance), so is One Health (which also is about surveillance) Along with calls for equity, social justice, ...

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... along with the 'gender pay gap' and so forth. This is the manifesto of a social justice warrior, and isn't really about health. Page 9 is what this really is about. Global Governance.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

They even reserve space for 'misinformation', vaccine CONfidence, and the same 'evidence based medicine' which brought you the Covid-19 'vaccines'. https://t.co/4hiJWUt4Pm

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and naturally, they need money. Lots and lots of it. It's only fair. $30bn/yr for starters. Swear on me mum, bargain. Honest, guv Longer piece on addstax coming up. https://t.co/Nqs9Zazhnt

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

The document can be located here, for the record. https://www.un.org/en/high-level-week-2023/#universalhealthcoverage https://t.co/3KMJW3mlYw

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

as I fully expected, visibility has now been choked. impressions are now only trickling in, at best, in spite of 11 r/t's. FREE SPEECH.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

global... governance? per un documents released today

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

I love honesty. No, really, I do. So when a document released today by the United Nations announces its honest intent - perhaps we should listen?

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Unsure why it took me so long, but I just worked out why UHC is so critical to those globalist organisations Because it will lead to not just a requirement for Digital ID, but also surveillance ... and the c19 vax cert is ID... https://uhc2030.org/fileadmin/uploads/uhc2030/Documents/Key_Issues/UHC2030_civil_society_engagement/CSEM_GMR_Commentary_2019_EN_WEB.pdf

Page not found Error - Not found - UHC2030 - UHC2030 uhc2030.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

It would appear that our friend, @antonioguterres of the @UN, does not like being called out for being a member of the Collegium International No idea why Hey Antonio, mate - why was this recently changed to 'High Commissioner for Refugees, Portugal' https://collegium-international.org/membres-collegium-international?lang=en…

Membres | Collegium International Liste des membres du Collegium International Michel Rocard Stéphane Hessel Edgar Morin Milan Kucan Jacques Toubon Pascal Lamy Sacha Goldman Bernard Miyet Ruth Dreyfuss Michael W. Doyle Mireille Delmas-Marty ... collegium-international.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and no - this is no 'conspiracy theory'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

This is one mighty 'conspiracy theory', and all. 2004. 'Stephane Hessel, Kofi Annan, Sacha Goldman, Collegium International at UN' https://collegium-international.org/united-nations-2004?lang=en…

About | Pearson collegium-international.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Woah, another piece in the puzzle. In 2019, the WHO released this; 'One Health surveillance and vaccination approach' - It applied in relation to Rift Valley Fever vaccines. I just discovered who worked on those.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

This guy. Brian Bird. One Health Institute. Also involved in the One Health Workforce-Next Generation. But that's not all... https://ohi.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/people/brian-bird

Brian H Bird, DVM, MSPH, PhD Brian Bird, DVM, PhD, MSPH, is the Director of the One Health Institute Laboratory and Associate Adjunct Professor of Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases. Dr. Bird’s work is focused on novel and known high-consequence viral zoonoses. He has an active research program in California, Sierra Leone and Tanzania that involves both the animal and human health sectors including virus discovery, virus-host ecology, and the development of countermeasures ranging from vaccines to community-based risk mitigation and interventions. ohi.vetmed.ucdavis.edu

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

And guess what else he's up to. PREEMPT https://www.preemptproject.org/team

Team — PREEMPT preemptproject.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

PREEMPT is one of the projects of the One Health Institute

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Another is 'Planetary Health'.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

RVF was placed on the WHO R&D Blueprint program in 2018 That R&D group aims to reduce the time from detection to development of vaccination. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/blue-print/2018-annual-review-of-diseases-prioritized-under-the-research-and-development-blueprint.pdf?sfvrsn=4c22e36_2

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

This also loops in 'Disease X'. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disease_X

Disease x - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

The chair of that group? None other than Jeremy Farrar.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Now taken off the web, here's what their webpage used to look like web.archive.org/web/2016010217…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Back to Brian Bird. You may have noticed I highlighted DARPA in the screen capture. But which projects were funded by DARPA? You'll never guess. https://www.avma.org/javma-news/2019-04-15/pre-empting-zoonotic-disease-threats

Pre-empting zoonotic disease threats A multimillion-dollar Defense Department grant is helping veterinary researchers predict the emergence of highly pathogenic zoonotic viruses and prevent them spilling over to humans. avma.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

And the One Health Institute? The were 'integral in global surveillance... and capacity building through its leadership of Predict'.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

1/ All the surveillance data gathered on every person on the planet by the NORAD / GSMA / AvesTerra collaboration would always end up somewhere. This is where the 3-D Commission comes in. What, you never heard of them? https://3dcommission.health/

3-D Commission A collaboration between the Rockefeller Foundation and Boston University School of Public Health, the 3-D Commission is an ambitious initiative that combines the insights of social determinants and the power of data to inform decisions that affect the health of populations. 3dcommission.health

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

2/ Funded by Rockefeller. Because you’ll always find one of those Foundations, that’s why.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

3/ The team features a few known faces. Heidi Larson. Golly. https://3dcommission.health/people

People — 3-D Commission 3dcommission.health

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

3/ The website was registered on January 20, 2020. https://whois.domaintools.com/3dcommission.health

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

4/ Very coincidentally, that was the day CEO Sandro Galea started his substack. In the end it always ends up with “limits on choice”. Per own substack. Strangely, this position isn’t listed on his LI profile. https://sandrogalea.substack.com/p/the-problem-of-bad-behavior

The problem of bad behavior On balancing public health’s focus on the structural drivers of health with the role of individual behavior. sandrogalea.substack.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

5/ Other seniors here. WHO, CDC, Facebook, CFR, Clinton+Gates Foundations, … you catch the drift.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

6/ During their early states, the created all sorts of wonderful working groups. First meeting took place April 27, 2020.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

7/ The official launch took place May 20, 2020. “Launching the future of population health”. Lofty ambitions, to say the least.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

8/ The end result was this. Sep 12, 2021. Large scale data leading to ‘better health decisions’. It even links to a paper… by Heidi Larson herself! Golly! https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e2ca08b9fdf240fb1abb55b/t/617aae3927d4790b590aef4e/1635429947691/3DCommission_Report_SDoH_Oct+12_final.pdf

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

9/ We’re not quite done here. Climate change. ‘Human displacement’ = migration. Intersectionality = communism. Data via surveillance. And SDGs.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

10/ If you didn’t get that, what they propose is to realtime monitor to protect you, and the environment, and intersectionality, and the SDGs, … There’s a short clip from the launch here. Final section is the most obvious communism. https://youtube.com/watch?v=qHeF-siKiwY…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

11/ And you know what happened? They had a Twitter profile. A very active one, too.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

12/ But it suddenly died. At the end of 2021. Here are the final tweets.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

13/ YouTube similar story. They posted lots of communism videos… but that all came to an end at the same time.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

14/ Instagram. Final update November 22, 2021. The mask lying there, abandoned. Prophetic.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

15/ As for Facebook. That site is now down. https://www.facebook.com/3-D-Commission-109964353938685/

Log into Facebook Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know. facebook.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

16/ So what did happen to spoil the plans? Could it be that Omicron was a massive failure, from the perspective of these stakeholders? Is it possible that Omicron was supposed to run riot, scaring us all into accepting this?

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

17/ Because as soon as Omicron emerged, all further work on their social media presence came to a prompt stop, and the company was never heard of again. And if so, was Omicron an intentional failure? Because all the infrastructure appeared in place for the global takeover.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

18/ To cement this This was not meant for health, but anything they could think of; climate change, migration, Rodney Dangerfield jokes were those an issue. They could have taken anyone out for any reason - and there would have been nothing you could do about it https://t.co/nUpz6NEwpf