TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @_aussie17

_aussie17
Posted - December 24, 2022 at 4:37 AM
Saved - November 23, 2025 at 10:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m seeing posts about the Thai king’s eldest daughter collapsing from a brain aneurysm. A top Thai neurologist then warned the COVID mRNA vaccine is unsafe. Some wonder if safety claims amount to insulting the monarchy under lèse-majesté. Dr. Thiravat Hemachudha is cited. One post notes no official statement.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

1/x This is interesting. The eldest daughter of Thai King collapses due to brain aneurysm. One week later the country’s TOP Neurologist decide to take side on the COVID Vaccine debate and declares the vaccine unsafe. He decided its safer to speak out https://www.asiasentinel.com/p/royal-death-in-thailand-throws-succession

Schrödinger's Princess: Is Thai Royal Alive or Dead? Death in Thailand throws succession into chaos asiasentinel.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

2/x. In Thailand, Kings have a demi-god status. The only few countries in the world where “lèse-majesté” laws still applies - don’t insult the royal family or risk severe punishment. I wonder if telling lies about SAFETY of covid vax is counted as “insulting” their intelligence

@_aussie17 - aussie17

3/x. Maybe thats why the Top Neuro is speaking out… he’s doesn’t wanna be on the wrong side of the equation 😂 What a movie we are watching ! 🍿

@_aussie17 - aussie17

1/x Wow! This is pretty big news… another day, another expert coming out to warn about the mRNA shots! This time we have Dr Thiravat Hemachudha, chief of the Thai Red Cross's Emerging Infectious Diseases Health Science Centre https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2464274/expert-warns-of-mrna-jab-link-to-acute-heart-issues

Expert warns of mRNA jab link to acute heart issues An emerging disease expert has voiced concern over the apparent link between a spate of heart-related symptoms among recipients of vaccines made using the mRNA technique, saying even though the risk is low, its impact on the heart is rather sudden and severe. bangkokpost.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

@TurdFur58439807 thats what i heard too but theres no official statement!

_aussie17
Posted - August 17, 2025 at 8:59 AM
Saved - August 17, 2025 at 1:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve noticed that the experimental vaccine is now widely discussed. Professor Jiang, who gained recognition for his predictions about the Iran wars, highlights the erosion of trust in institutions, using COVID and the vaccines as prime examples. He reflects on how the government imposed lockdowns, disrupting lives without clear evidence of COVID's danger, and mandated an experimental vaccine for everyone.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨 It appears that the experimental vaccine has become common knowledge. Professor Jiang, recently recognized for predicting the Iran wars, discusses the decline of institutional trust, citing COVID and the experimental vaccines as a key example. -------- Then you had Covid, right? Covid, where the government, the elite, locked down the entire nation. Kids could not go to school, the poor could not go to work and make a living. And there was absolutely no evidence that Covid was actually dangerous. Okay? Then the government made everyone take an experimental vaccine. -------------------- H/T: @xueqinjiang

Video Transcript AI Summary
What kept the country together was the fact that people believed that the elites in power knew what they were doing and they were, they cared about the well-being of the nation and of the people. But recent events have shown this isn't true. For example, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Why did America fight these wars? For no reason. the two thousand eight financial crisis where the banks basically stole from the nation, stole from the poor, and kept the money. COVID where the the government, the elite locked down the entire nation. Kids could not go to school. The poor could not go to work and make a living. And there was actually no evidence that COVID was actually dangerous. Then, the government made everyone take a experimental vaccine. elite actions over the past twenty years have made people cynical of power. there's no more trusted institution.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then the third problem is breakdown of authority or institutions. K? What kept the country together was the fact that people believed that the elites in power knew what they were doing and they were, they cared about the well-being of the nation and of the people. K? But recent events have shown this isn't true. Okay? So for example, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Right? Well, why did America fight these wars? For no reason. Then you had the two thousand eight financial crisis where the banks basically stole from the nation, stole from the poor, and kept the money. And everyone everyone was screwed. Okay? Then you had COVID. Right? COVID where the the government, the elite locked down the entire nation. Kids could not go to school. The poor could not go to work and make a living. And there was actually no evidence that COVID was actually dangerous. Okay? Then, the government made everyone take a experimental vaccine. And people were like, why are we doing this? Okay? So elite actions over the past twenty years have made people cynical of power. So that to in today's world, there's actually in in today's America, there's no more trusted institution. Okay?
_aussie17
Posted - July 2, 2025 at 11:50 AM
Saved - July 2, 2025 at 12:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Japanese Health Minister has reversed the recommendation for COVID vaccines for pregnant mothers, likely due to significant data indicating potential harms like miscarriages. It feels validating to see this acknowledgment of concerns we've raised.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Well the Japanese Health Minister just made a U-Turn and stopped recommending COVID Vaccines to pregnant mothers, likely due to overwhelming data showing excessing harms such as miscarriages. Let's just say we told them so! https://t.co/RWtwava3gF

Video Transcript AI Summary
日本語: 話者0は、厚生労働省が妊婦に特定の行為を推奨しているかどうかを尋ねた。話者1は、推奨していないと答えた。話者0は感謝の意を述べた。 English translation: Speaker 0 asked if the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare recommends a specific action for pregnant women. Speaker 1 replied that they do not. Speaker 0 expressed gratitude.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 現在 厚生 労 働 省 と し て は 妊婦 に は 推 奨 し て いる ん で しょう か し て い な い ん で しょう か し て Speaker 1: い ま せ ん わかり ま し た Speaker 0: ありがとうございました

@_aussie17 - aussie17

SOURCE TWEET https://t.co/ju7PvOiRpk

@JINKOUZOUKA_jp - 藤江成光@4月22日発売「おかしくないですか!?日本人･謎の大量死」

本日（7/1）の厚労大臣会見 現在、妊婦の新型コロナワクチン接種は「推奨していない」 https://t.co/qbegll6fIh

Video Transcript AI Summary
厚生労働省は妊婦にワクチンを推奨していません。 The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare does not recommend the vaccine for pregnant women.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 現在、 厚生 労 働 省 と し て は 妊婦 に は 推 奨 し て いる ん で しょう か し て い な い ん で しょう か し て い ま せ ん 。 わかり ま し た 。 ありがとうございました

@JINKOUZOUKA_jp - 藤江成光@4月22日発売「おかしくないですか!?日本人･謎の大量死」

厚生労働大臣が（やっと）明言 現在、若者の新型コロナワクチン接種は「推奨していない」 https://t.co/cpe0ENaOXw

Video Transcript AI Summary
推奨はしているんでしょうか、していないんでしょうか。若者に対して。 推奨をしていると公的勧告の対象から今は外している。 推奨していないと理解してよろしいでしょうか。 していない。 わかりました。 **Translation:** Is it recommended or not, for young people? It is recommended, but is now excluded from the scope of public recommendations. Is it correct to understand that it is not recommended? It is not. Understood.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 最後 に もう 一 言 だけ 確認 さ せ て ください 推 奨 は し て いる ん で しょう か し て い な い ん で しょう か 現 時 点 で 若 者 に 対 し て は Speaker 1: それ は 確認 さ ん ここ を 繰り 返し て 推 奨 を し て いる と 公的 官 へ の 対 象 から 今 は 外 し て いる ということ で ござい Speaker 0: ます。 ということ は 、推奨 し て い な い と 理 解 し て よろ し い で しょう か 。 Speaker 1: し て い な い と いう Speaker 0: 。 し て い な い 。 わかり ま し た 。 ありがとうございました
_aussie17
Posted - May 27, 2025 at 10:35 AM
Saved - May 27, 2025 at 12:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I faced threats while working as a WHO consultant, particularly regarding the mRNA vaccine. I warned the media against it before its release, but my voice was silenced through intimidation. I also suggested ivermectin, which led to further suppression. The studies on the vaccine were flawed, and I believe the public is unaware of the truth due to media control. I assert that the vaccine is not genuine but rather gene therapy, with unpredictable effects on health. This situation appears to be part of a larger, orchestrated agenda.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 "I WAS THREATENED!": WHO Consultant and Expert Toxicologist Exposes mRNA Vaccine Deceptions. Press Conference 21 May 2025, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia ----------------------------------------- I’ve given a lot of advice to WHO when I worked as a consultant panel for WHO. If there were world problems, I’ve been to Geneva, to Canada. For meetings, I know how WHO works. I can’t say much because before entering that room, there were 10 forms to sign, phones had to be kept outside, everything was very strict. So, no need to say much. But I know how they work, and I also know how this vaccine works. Two or three months before the vaccine came out, I already told the media not to take this vaccine. We’re not sure yet, but my mouth was shut, and I was threatened in all sorts of ways, that’s a long story. So, I couldn’t tell. After that, I gave another suggestion. Take ivermectin, and I was also suppressed they gave another warning until I was almost arrested. So, that’s the story. ... At the early stage, we already knew this vaccine wasn’t perfect. The studies weren’t perfect, and we tried to speak, but all our speech was silenced, and they gave warnings. If we spoke again, tomorrow they’d arrest us. Okay, what we said about the vaccine, people couldn’t know because it wasn’t allowed. .. Okay, we had ivermectin at that time. But if you mentioned ivermectin, your place would be in jail. So, all this we saw is not real, not real. This is a trap and a plan by parties who... Are trying to do something wrong. So, this is what we need to know, but the public doesn’t know because... All the media available comes from one channel; everything else is deleted. Okay, whatever you say is all deleted. I’ve had to register my YouTube and others dozens of times because they delete it, they don’t allow it. TikTok comes out today, tomorrow it’s shut down, finished. So, all this is planned. Many already know that studies in America say this vaccine strategy is fake and deliberately made. And we don’t want to talk too much. That’s too much to discuss for the press conference. But we know, in short, we can say the vaccine is fraud. The vaccine is fraud. Don’t trust it, it’s a scam, it’s not real. And what we’ve received isn’t a vaccine. It’s gene therapy! .. Now we know that it changes various genes in our body, all sorts of things, from blood clots to leads to sudden deaths. So, this shows that the vaccine that came, each batch is different. And the contents are different too, and we can’t predict what it’ll cause—cancer or anything. So, we need to understand that this is a planned agenda, not something natural.

Video Transcript AI Summary
**Bahasa Melayu:** Penceramah berkongsi pengalamannya sebagai penasihat WHO dan pengetahuannya tentang vaksin. Beliau mendakwa telah memberi amaran tentang vaksin COVID-19 sebelum ia dikeluarkan, tetapi disenyapkan. Beliau mencadangkan alternatif seperti ivermectin, tetapi juga disekat. Isu COVID-19 digunakan untuk agenda lain, dengan vaksin sebagai fokus utama. Vaksin mRNA yang digunakan berbeza daripada vaksin tradisional dan dipromosikan secara agresif walaupun terdapat kesan sampingan. Pakar tempatan dan tokoh agama digunakan untuk mempromosikan vaksin, manakala pandangan alternatif disenyapkan. FDA digunakan sebagai sandaran untuk kelulusan vaksin kecemasan, walaupun terdapat pilihan rawatan lain. Maklumat yang salah disebarkan melalui media, dan percubaan untuk berkongsi maklumat alternatif disekat. Rakyat disogok untuk mengambil vaksin dan booster. Beliau mendakwa tiada bukti vaksin menyelamatkan nyawa, tetapi banyak bukti kesan buruk. Vaksin COVID-19 sebenarnya adalah terapi gen yang mengubah genetik manusia, menyebabkan pelbagai masalah kesihatan. Beliau menggesa orang ramai untuk tidak panik tentang virus dan fokus pada meningkatkan sistem imun. **English Translation:** The speaker shared his experience as a WHO advisor and his knowledge of vaccines. He claimed to have warned about the COVID-19 vaccine before its release but was silenced. He suggested alternatives like ivermectin but was also blocked. The COVID-19 issue was used for other agendas, with the vaccine as the main focus. The mRNA vaccines used differ from traditional vaccines and were aggressively promoted despite side effects. Local experts and religious figures were used to promote the vaccine, while alternative views were silenced. The FDA was used as a backup for emergency vaccine approval, even though other treatment options existed. Misinformation was spread through the media, and attempts to share alternative information were blocked. People were bribed to take vaccines and boosters. He claimed there is no evidence that vaccines save lives, but plenty of evidence of adverse effects. The COVID-19 vaccine is actually gene therapy that alters human genetics, causing various health problems. He urged people not to panic about the virus and focus on boosting their immune systems.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Telah banyak membuat kajian, saya banyak memberi nasihat kepada WHO semasa saya kerja dulu saya konsol pada WHO kalau ada masalah masalah dunia saya pernah pergi ke Jenibah, pergi ke Kenadecel untuk musyawarat kita, saya tahu macam mana WHO bekerja ini saya tahu macam mana dia bekerja saya tak mencatat banyak, sebab ini sebelum saya masuk itu 10, surat, kena saing, simpan, ke luar semua sangat strict, saya tidak bisa catat banyak tapi saya tahu bagaimana mereka bekerja dan saya juga tahu bagaimana vaksin ini berfungsi dan 23 bulan sebelum vaksin keluar saya pun tidak bagi tahu dekat media bahwa jangan ambil vaksin ini kita tidak pasti lagi tapi menurut saya ditutup dan saya di traited macammacam lah itu banyak cerita jadi saya tidak boleh nak bagi tahu setelah itu saya pula bagi tahu satu cadangan yang lain ambillah air bermaking itupun saya di supress dibagi warning lagi sampai nak ditangkap jadi itulah ceritanya ya. Apa masalah? Tanya saya fokus pada kesehatan saja pada covid dan juga anak beranak sebenarnya isu2 ini bukan saja difokuskan pada covid Mereka ada banyak lagi agenda lain yang sebaliknya Tetapi dia punya Approos Dia punya intisari bermula dengan covid covid ini menjadi dia punya peluru gula sebenarnya tidak ada yang apapun tapi isu ini jadi besar dan covid jadi seolaholah suatu pandemic yang cukup berbahaya dan dia punya dia punya mutiara adalah vaksin kalau kita lihat kedudukan vaksin vaksin yang ada memang tidak sama langsung dengan apa yang mereka katakan vaksin yang ada adalah vaksin yang sudah kita gunakan daripada dulu lagi walaupun sedikit bahaya tapi tidak seteruk apa yang mereka buat dengan vaksin mRNA oke saya akan cerita kenapa vaksin ini sebenarnya tidak ada apa pohon dari dulu kita sudah pakai tidak ada senyap pohon tapi pada hari ini seolaholah untuk semua penyakit vaksin saja obatnya kenapa? Kenapa jadi macam tuh semua tidak guna untuk vaksin ada 450 tidak tersentuh tidak pakai vaksin, tidak bawa busa ini satu benda yang mengkairankan kita kenapa? Vaksin saja difokuskan sedangkan vaksin ini tidak sepenting apa yang kita tahu sejak dulu lagi budak kecil diambil vaksin pasti kita lupa lah vaksin dan kita tahu vaksin ini memang ada kesan sampingan jadi sebenarnya apa yang mereka nak guna adalah dia punya pivot dia punya trust adalah vaksin dan kita tahu vaksin ini dipaksa ataupun disogok dengan cara yang begitu kejam mereka kata vaksin ini satusatunya penyelamat dunia oke pada masa covid sudahlah mereka keluarkan covid itu dengan sewenangwenang lalu itu dikatakan vaksin ini satusatunya penyelamat pada peringkat awal kita sudah tahu dah vaksin ini tidak sempurna kajian pun tak sempurna dan kita coba bercakap semua percakapan kita disenyapkan dan dibagi warning kalau cakap lagi besok kita akan rest ini pengalaman jadi apa yang kita katakan mengenai vaksin tidak dapat orang tahu sebab tidak dibenarkan jadi hanya yang mereka cakap saja rakyat dapat tahu apa yang mereka cakap semuanya baik dan mereka juga menggunakan expertise lokal di Malaysia mereka sudah tahu sapersapa mereka bagi briefing briefing ini daripada bukan daripada yang sebenarnya tapi daripada kumpulan yang berkepentingan mereka panggil kakakkakak di bagian penerangan, kakakkakak ingat dia memang expert betulbetul apa yang ditangkap mereka panggil mufti dan ulama orangorang yang memberi penerangan itu adalah orangorang yang berpihak pada yang lain mufti bila dia dengar orang yang cakap dia percaya dia bukan saintis jadi mereka pun mulai mulai harus pakailah kalau tidak pakai berdosa so ini semuanya adalah perencanaan yang telah ada sebelum itu dan yang paling kuat mereka pegang FDA FDA kalau pergi ke satu dunia pun, dokter akan percaya dia katakan FDA approve the vaksin anda emergency jus sebenarnya anda emergency jus ini kalau tidak ada apaapa yang lain untuk menyelesaikan masalah baru dibolehkan menggunakan bahan yang dipanggil sebenarnya benar itu pada masa itu ada bahan lain tapi mereka tidak bagi kita bercacat kita ada ivomectin pada masa itu tapi kalau sebut saja ivomectin, dalam penjara lah jadi ini semua kita dah 4 adalah ini adalah perangkap dan perancangan pihakpihak yang mencoba membuat sesuatu yang tak betul jadi inilah yang kita perlu tahu tetapi rakyat tidak tahu semua media yang ada adalah dari satu chanel yang lain semua dipadamkan oke, apapun yang kamu katakan itu semua dilakukan kita saya berapa puluh kali kena register youtube dan sebagainya sebab dia beli, tidak pagi tidak, tiktok keluar ini besok tutup habis so ini semua adalah perancangan jadi apa yang rakyat dapat adalah wrong information tapi ada setengahsetengah rakyat dia tahu dan dia coba amalkan yang itu mereka sadar tapi sebagian besar nya tidak sadar dan bukan itu saja the follow up of the the vaccination dan booster dihasut dan disogok kepada rakyat dengan berbagaibagai cara sehingga sebagian besar rakyat dapat sampai 4 dus dan tidak lama kemudian setelah kita bercakap kita katakan ini tidak betul ini bahaya, karena jagajaga semuanya disenyapkan dan kita tidak dapat apaapa maklumat untuk tidak sampaikan kepada masyarakat apa yang kita cakap nih semua dikata tipu dan orang ini tak boleh percaya sedangkan apa yang mereka cakap itu akan dikeluarkan pada media perdana dan diberi pada rakyat jadi rakyat sekarang kalau nak pergi haji pun kena ambil vaksin oke kalau tidak ada vaksin tak boleh pergi haji dulu nak pergi masjid pun kena ambil vaksin ingatkan kata masjid dulu ketada vaksin tak boleh jadi ini semua nak pergi, nak pergi kemanamana pun nak pergi ke supermarket pun jadi ini semua adalah satu maklumat palsu yang diindaksikan diintius to the mind of the people makanya rakyat adalah pun disogok dan di brain wash sehingga maklumat itu terlekat sebagai benda yang betul sesuatu yang tak betul biasanya kalau kita bagi tahu kali kali kali kali dia jadi betul macam orang yang mencuri lah setiap kali, saya saya saya saya ini bukan kerja saya lamalama orang percaya dia tak mencuri sok sok sok dia jadi ini semua fenomena biasa jadi sekarang sekarang kita sudah pun dalam peringkat yang dikatakan vasa yang tengah banyak lagi yang nak buat nih tapi vasa tengah vasa tengah ini masyarakat sekarang 50 50 50% sudah tahu keburukan vaksin tapi 50% tak bisa dia percaya lagi dengan vaksin dikatakan ini ini ini ini tak pula itu kita tanam pinjam panjang apa yang perlu kita buat sekarang adalah kita perlu mengambil tahu bahwa tidak ada satu bukti pun yang kita boleh ambil untuk mengatakan vaksin ini telah menyelamatkan seseorang coba bagi saya satu bukti satu yang telah diselamatkan oleh vaksin tapi banyak yang telah diselamatkan oleh benarbenar lain kita tahu, kita nampak so, kita pegang dan kita juga walaupun ditepis maklumak maklumak yang dianggap pergi itu ditepis tapi kita juga dapat celah celah dari pada internet itu maklumak yang betul jadi gamma yang sudah tahu kajian kajian di amerika mengatakan strategi vaksin ini adalah palsu dan dibuat dengan sengaja dan banyak kita sangat cakap, banyak sangat, banyak sangat banyak untuk diskusi pada press conference tapi kita tahu bahwa secara ringkasnya kita boleh katakan vaksin itu stroke vaksin itu stroke jangan keras, dia bukan benar betul dan apa yang telah kita dapat itu, bukannya vaksin itu adalah Ginter Terapi apa bezelnya? Ginter Terapi ini dulu, kalau tidak paham vaksin tidak paham oleh Jean Therapy vaksin ini diambil virus tuh dia lemah kan dia, dia masuk virus tuh jadi dia akan hadir dalam badan kita, badan kita kenal dia badan kita pun buat tentara atau lawan itu saja tidak lama lama kita akan jadi rintangan itu tinggi lah rintangan kita pada virus tapi ini secara semula jadi memang kalau kita terkena sesuatu yang ada kuman badan kita pun akan keluarkan antibodi untuk kuman itu biasa itu manusia boleh buat jadi kalau dibagi vaksin macam itu kita boleh percaya oke betul tapi apa yang berlaku sekarang dia bagi sesuatu yang mengubah genetik kita vaksin tidak diubah genetik pun yang ini diubah genetik bila dia kata ubah genetik dia bagi kita dalam betul bolehkah kita tahu betul ketika dia dicatat ataukah atau pun boleh diubah genetik atau pun genetik mana dia tidak ubah jadi sekarang kita tau bahwa dia ubah, berbagai pakai jin pada badan kita macammacam benda sampai plak kelaok lah, sampai jadi pesant lah, mati, pengecut lah jadi ini menunjukkan bahwa vaksin yang datang itu setiap basnya berbeda dan dalam kandungan dia pun berbedabeda dan kita tidak boleh nak kata apa tidak boleh nak prediksi karena kanker lampu semata jadi kita kenapa paham bahwa ini adalah satu agenda yang terancam bukan yang semudah jadi jadi janganlah percaya kepada katakata bahwa oh virus sudah sampai kesini virus dana yang kena pakai tutup muka lagi jangan keluar rumah lagi, don't have to worry about that do our job, meningkatkan sistem imun kita kuatkan sistem imun kita kalau ada barang sedikitsedikit kita boleh mboten so itulah yang perlu kita tahu masa pun sudah banyak sengaja bagi background meski pas pro city banyak yang tahu gua bunuh.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

EMAILABLE FORMAT https://www.aussie17.com/p/i-was-threatened-who-consultant-and

“I Was Threatened!”: WHO Consultant and Expert Toxicologist Exposes mRNA Vaccine Deceptions. "The vaccine is fraud. Don’t trust it, it’s a scam, it’s not real" aussie17.com
_aussie17
Posted - March 12, 2024 at 10:31 PM
Saved - May 17, 2025 at 2:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I wrote an open letter to the Metropolitan Police, introducing myself as Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former senior executive in the pharmaceutical industry. I have evidence of serious crimes related to what I term the "Covid era." I assert that there was no pandemic, just a manipulation of diagnostic tests and government misinformation. Additionally, I claim that the so-called Covid vaccines are designed to cause harm, including toxicity and reduced fertility. I invite the police to evaluate my evidence and look forward to discussing these charges further.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Open Letter from Mike Yeadon to Metropolitan Police Please share! ========================== From: MikeYeadon Date: On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 22:56 Subject: Fw: Dr Mike Yeadon: Introductory statement about serious crimes per Mark Sexton communication To: Ben.Bates@met.police.uk Cc: Mark Sexton Dear Ben Bates, I have been asked by former policeman, Mark Sexton (copied) to introduce myself to you & to indicate the fields in which I have unequivocal evidence of criminal activity. Let me begin my outlining my credentials to have realised that the areas I will outline were incorrect in the first place. My name is Dr Mike Yeadon. I am the most senior, former “big pharma” & biotech research executive speaking out about several serious crimes in relation to what I call the “Covid era”. My original training was in Biochemistry & Toxicology, in which I was awarded the strongest first class joint honours degree that the School of Biomedical Sciences had ever awarded at the time (1985, University of Surrey). Part of my undergraduate training involved research placements at the Chemical Defence Establishment, Porton Down, Wiltshire, where I was a small cog in the long term development of injected antidotes for nerve gas poisoning to protect British troops. I also worked at the then Central Laboratory of the Forensic Sciences Service, Aldermaston, Berkshire, adjacent to the Atomic Weapons Research Establishment. While with the Forensic Science Service, I received training on several precision analytical methods including mass spectrometry, then a highly technically complex method. As far as I recall, I had security clearance for both establishments. Porton Down, then as now, is a top security facility with an international reputation. My PhD, in the field of Pharmacology was “On the effect of opiates on respiratory function” (1988) and this was sponsored by the MOD. After securing my PhD, which gave me a sound training in several additional subdisciplines of biology, chemistry & drug metabolism, I joined the pharmaceutical industry. I spent 24years with “big pharma”, starting at Wellcome Research Laboratories, where I briefly worked alongside a Dr Patrick Vallance (who became Chief Scientific Advisor to the British Government). For the longest period, I was in charge of Pfizer’s global research in the field of Allergic & Respiratory Disease Therapeutics. I left Pfizer in 2011, having reached the level of Vice President, because the company had decided to exit their large R&D base in Kent. The parting was cordial. Before leaving, I sought to find new homes for the portfolio of exploratory medicines I had helped create & was gratified that Mylan U.K. Ltd, the world’s second largest generics company, acquired much of my former portfolio soon after I had left. I later founded & lead as CEO a highly successful biotechnology company, Ziarco Pharma Ltd. Pfizer and four other venture capital firms were investors in my company, which was acquired by Novartis Pharmaceuticals, in 2017. 📷My accomplishments are considered by some to have been unusual. So much so that a former Pfizer board member & previously worldwide head of R&D, Dr John LaMattina, wrote up my last venture in Forbes, a leading business magazine (February 2017). In summary, I have had a very strong training in multiple disciplines and over 30 years leadership experience in the field of inventing and testing new medicines for respiratory illnesses. I have an excellent analytical background and I can claim to be at least the equal of anyone advising the government in science. I have no history of “conspiracy theory” or political campaigns or protests. I don’t believe I made a single public comment on anything prior to 2020. My accomplishments in applied biomedical sciences qualify me to be taken seriously. I ask that the evidence I marshall is evaluated thoroughly. I am confident in my assessments, which have been tested by dozens of others, internationally well known scientists and doctors. I have filed numerous legal statements as affidavits used in court proceedings in several countries. I’m going to introduce just two topics at this point. To cover everything would be simply too overwhelming to read, let alone absorb & understand at a single sitting. I’m simply going to make statements. I’m not going to attempt to prove them in this short communication. Rest assured I have done so however, on dozens of occasions. I’ve given upwards of 250 full length interviews. I must warn the reader that even this deliberately limited information is going to be shocking, if you hadn’t already realised that something without precedent in the world was going on. Please also note that ordinary searching on the internet, often colloquially as “googling”, is not going to find many of the sources upon which I have drawn. The major search engines have been manipulated such that the results exclude material troubling to the authorities. The two areas are: 1. The claimed pandemic. 2. The injections, purporting to be vaccines. The main claims are stark. 1. Put simply, there has been no pandemic. There was the normal range of illnesses in the early part of 2020 as in any other year. What was different about 2020 was that all governments, lead by the WHO, engaged in coordinated lying to their citizens. This continues to this day. Everyone was told there was a pandemic was coming. The illusion was created by deliberate misuse of a clinical diagnostic test called PCR. The heart of this entire deception is the incorrect belief that PCR is nearly flawless and so a positive result means that a person “had covid”. There is no such disease. Not one symptom is unique to the claimed new disease. A positive test was called “a case”. Anybody dying within a few weeks of a positive test was declared “a covid death”. All that was needed was to roll out such tests rapidly in early 2020 & the carefully planned result, an apparent “pandemic” was created. Government & media lies was initially all it took to maintain the illusion. Crucially, the epidemiological evidence shows that there was no additional illness or deaths compared with the same period in any other year. Numerous scientific papers and authors will present their evidence on this point, including university professors qualified in epidemiology. The WHO played their part in the crime, by declaring a “public health emergency of international concern”, or a “pandemic”. Immediately after WHO’s fraudulent declaration, changes in medical procedures were imposed everywhere. These changes caused the deaths that were held up to the citizens as proof that we were in a pandemic. We have a long list of witnesses to these changes being inappropriate and often fatal. Notice my PhD was on the effects of opiates, like morphine, on respiration. I knew that what was being prescribed was definitely inappropriate. So, no pandemic. Only the deliberate illusion of one. This was accompanied by changes in medical practise that would predictably result in large numbers of deaths in hospitals, care homes and the community. No one will fail to appreciate the severity of the charges here. I cannot be sure the motivation for this deception was. But the effects of it has been to severely damage the economies of scores of countries, with financial transfers counted in trillions of pounds, from the poorest & the taxpayers to the wealthiest elites. Civil society has also been severely disrupted and has never been allowed to begin to heal. Other, less speculative motivations became apparent as 2020 wore on & this brings us to my second, shocking charge. 2. The materials that are being called “covid1U vaccines” are obviously not vaccines. Note, there has been no pandemic. My entire career has been in the field of designing and testing new arrangements of atoms to create what we hope will be new potential medicines. In addition to bringing about desired changes in the body, the main concern is to avoid unwanted effects, in other words, toxicity or harms. My training in mechanistic toxicology was repeatedly useful in helping teams foresee, avoid or understand such problems. So I understand deeply how to design molecules and also how to interrogate them for their prospects to bring about desired effects and crucially to discern risks of harms. I don’t think it’s too great a claim to say that there isn’t anyone better qualified than I am to do this in relation to these novel treatments. I’m going to go directly to the charges. These injections have been carefully designed to intentionally cause toxicity in those injected with them. I can detect at least three, separate features of these injections which would be expected to injure, to kill or to reduce fertility in survivors. These are not mistakes. Each are so obviously deliberate to anyone who has a history of involvement in rational drug design for new medicines. At least two features are common to every injection purporting to be a “covid vaccine”. First, the mRNA nature of the major products. Second, the lipid nanoparticle nature of the formulations in which they are encapsulated. The mRNA is genetic code for a chosen protein. Regardless of what the protein is, once the human body is caused to express it, it will be recognized as foreign and attacked by their own immune system. Depending on details we cannot know, just by looking at the glass vials, some people will be injured as a result of this lethal autoimmune attack. Others will be killed, the time taken to die & their suffering before they die will vary. It’ll look like the normal range of illnesses. There will simply be more of them. Because of the lipid nano particle formulation, some of the injected materials will accumulate in the ovaries (possibly also the testicles). This homing property in reproductive tissue has been known about for more than a decade. The effect will be a lowering of fertility affecting every stage of reproduction. I can bring detailed rationales for each of these claims as well as several others. I also have an usual piece of evidence, given the crimes I claim have been committed. I had worked out part of this assault before any purported vaccine had received its fraudulent authorization. Having done so, with another author, I wrote an open letter to the European Medicines Authority in early December 2020, which is attached below. In it, we warn of the harms which we anticipated. It has been more than upsetting to watch them come true, the last taking a year, the adverse effects on fertility. All-causes mortality is elevated almost everywhere in the world that these products have been widely used and live births sharply reduced. I look forward to the opportunity to speak with you in considerable detail about these and other charges. I will publish this letter on my Telegram site, where 20,000 followers will no doubt be interested to learn what the Met Police does with this information. If I may be so bold, I would invite you to think about how you plan to describe your next actions to your family and, if you have them, your children and grandchildren. With best wishes and thank you for your attention. Dr Mike Yeadon -------------------

@_aussie17 - aussie17

LINK 1 https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2017/03/15/turning-pfizer-discards-into-novartis-gold-the-story-of-ziarco/?sh=2470f0Ua7572

Turning Pfizer Discards Into Novartis Gold: The Story Of Ziarco Mike was told in the fall of 2010 that Pfizer was closing the Allergy & Respiratory diseases programs and his own role as the CSO of this group was being eliminated. Rather than seek employment elsewhere, Mike had others ideas. forbes.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

LINK 2 https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2017/03/15/turning-pfizer-discards-into-novartis-gold-the-story-of-ziarco/?sh=2470f0Ua7572

Turning Pfizer Discards Into Novartis Gold: The Story Of Ziarco Mike was told in the fall of 2010 that Pfizer was closing the Allergy & Respiratory diseases programs and his own role as the CSO of this group was being eliminated. Rather than seek employment elsewhere, Mike had others ideas. forbes.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

SOURCE: Mike's Telegram

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Mike Yeadon announces his new, official Telegram channel: "DOCTOR MIKE YEADON's solo channel." He warns that other channels using his name are not legitimate. He thanks Robin Monotti for his help over the past few years in waking people up to prevent oncoming tyranny. The focus of their work has shifted, prompting the creation of separate channels. Yeadon encourages those who have benefited from his previous work to subscribe to and share his new channel. He looks forward to continuing to help people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everybody, this is Doctor Mike Yeadon. I'm making this short video so that you know this new channel, Doctor Mike Yeadon's solo channel on Telegram, is me. Accept no invitations, there are many other channels with my name on them, they are not mine, it's only this one. Uppercase letters for my name and lowercase letters for solo channel. I'd like to thank Robin Monotti for his great help over the last few years. We share the desire to wake up as many people as possible to delay, divert and prevent the oncoming tyranny. The focus of our work has changed enough so that I think it makes sense for us to have separate channels. If you've benefited from following me on the shared channel in the past, please subscribe to this one and also share it with your network so that we can get more people listening to this channel. I look forward to continuing to help you as much as I can. Thanks very much.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

My commentary at the end https://www.aussie17.com/p/dr-mike-yeadons-open-letter-to-the

Dr Mike Yeadon's Open Letter to the Metropolitan Police. Please share! aussie17.com
_aussie17
Posted - March 12, 2024 at 8:18 AM
Saved - May 13, 2025 at 12:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared exciting news about the first experiments on genetic vaccines conducted by two brilliant female scientists. They found that human cells absorbed the vaccine, leading to the production of spike proteins in significant quantities. Their findings showed that the spike proteins are stable and can be detected in the blood for several days. They also collaborated with Kevin McKernan, who confirmed the presence of bacterial DNA integrated into human chromosomes. Stay tuned for more updates!

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Oh-oh! First experiments of genetic vaccines getting absorbed by human cells completed - Prof Sucharit Bhakdi reveals. ----------------------------- Our two lady scientists who are just brilliant, they took cells, human cells, and immersed these cells in the vaccine and they found, and these are the first experiments that have ever been done, okay, that the human cells immediately took up the vaccines and the DNA and the chromosomes, and the chromosomes, bacterial chromosomes, entered the cells and these cells immediately started making the spike protein in horrendous quantity and they have quantified this, they have shown what happens to the spike protein, that it is stable, that it is shed into the blood, into the circulation, they have shown that they can measure this in the blood, they can measure this anywhere actually, and they have shown that the plasmid and the spike production goes on for many, many days. So, what did our girls do? They sent their human cells that had been transfected to Kevin McKernan, begging the question, Kevin, can you find any chromosomal integration of bacterial DNA in the human cell chromosomes? Do you know the answer? He put it up in his substack one week ago, and the answer is yes. He's found it. ------------------------------------- @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Human cells immersed in vaccines immediately took up the vaccines, DNA, and bacterial chromosomes, and started producing spike protein in large quantities. The spike protein is stable, shed into the blood, and measurable. Plasmid and spike production continues for many days. Uptake of a foreign chromosome equates to genetic modification, and an instant moratorium on vaccines is demanded until manufacturers and regulatory authorities can guarantee they will not genetically modify people. Modified RNAs and plasmids don't need to integrate into human chromosomes to genetically modify cells; functioning within the cell for extended periods is sufficient. Chromosomal integration of fragments into the "book of life" can smear pages, preventing them from being read, which could explain the worldwide explosion of tumors. Human cells transfected were sent to Kevin McKernan, who found chromosomal integration of bacterial DNA in the human cells' chromosomes. This information can be used to demand action, including from governments.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What then happened was that this Kevin McKernan's findings were belittled and, you know, thrown away, although they were reproduced in Canada by Spieschen. Now what our girls have done, our two lady scientists who are just brilliant. Okay? They took cells, human cells, and immersed these cells in the vaccine. And they found, and these are the first experiments that have ever been done, okay, that the human cells immediately took up the vaccines and the DNA and the chromosomes and the chromosomes, bacterial chromosomes, entered the cells, and these cells immediately started making the spike protein in horrendous quantity. And they have quantified this. They have shown what happens to the spike protein, that it is stable, that it is shed into into the blood, into the circulation. They have shown that they can measure this in the blood. They can measure this anywhere, actually. And they have shown that the plasmid and the spike production goes on for many, many days. We are trying to find the limit right now. Alright? And this is being put on paper. It's going to become a fact that is going to be made known to the world because the uptake of a foreign chromosome into your cell equates with nothing less than genetic modification. It equates. So these guys have been genetically modifying millions of human beings. Do you want to allow this to happen, continue to happen? If not, demand an instant moratorium. These vaccines have all got to be stopped until unless you these guys, these manufacturers and the governments, the regulatory authorities can guarantee to the people of the world that they are not going to be genetically modified. And they will never do that. They can't. It's impossible. So I think the next parts are going to be very interesting ones, once these papers are out. The last thing I want to tell you is, you know, these modified RNAs and the plasmids don't even have to necessarily cause become inserted into the human chromosome. As long as they act and function within the cell for extended time periods, the cell is genetically modified. Right? So, because it's a foreign chromosome. And, that alone must be enough to put all these people behind bars if they keep on doing it, including the politicians. You may say, well, that sounds terrible. Could it be even worse if anyone could show chromosomal integration of fragments of those, you know, into the book of life? Because the Book of Life, you know, has so many recipes, the Book of Life. And if something comes to lie beside the Book of Life, which happens whenever a cell divides, all right, these chromosomes and chromosome fragments will come to lie within the nucleus and integration can take place. And once integration takes place in a page of your book of life, that page cannot be read anymore. Now we all know how many pages are important. We don't know. They are innumerable pages important for the control of cell division, differentiation, tumor suppression. If any one of those pages gets smeared, that page will not be read. Now if you go out and ask them, why in god's name are all these tumors exploding all over the world? I don't know, but chromosomal integration would be one very, very viable explanation. So, what did our girls do? They sent their human cells that had been transfected to Kevin McKernan. Taking the question, Kevin, can you find any chromosomal integration of bacterial DNA in the human cells chromosomes? Do you know the answer? He put it up in his Substack one week ago, and the answer is yes. He's found it. Outrageous. It's not outrageous. It's good. Now it's they who want to put on the run. Now they are in for it. If they keep on pressing this, even your UK government, even your premier what's his name? Sunak. I think he's an Indian as as far as I Rishi Sunak. He he better watch out. He better watch out. And I met with Andrew Bridgen a few days ago, and I think that Andrew is going to use this information because all of you can use it now. All of you. I will be speaking to Thailand in two days, and I'm going to tell him this and say now is the time to act.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Write up here! Quick, heat up the popcorn!! 🍿🍿🍿 https://www.aussie17.com/p/scientists-stunned-by-first-proofs

Scientists Stunned by First Proofs of Contaminated DNA getting absorbed into Human Cells "These cells did not merely interact with the vaccines but absorbed them, incorporating foreign DNA into their very structure" aussie17.com
_aussie17
Posted - March 13, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Saved - March 14, 2025 at 6:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently shared significant findings from Dr. Peter Kotlár, who claims that vaccinated individuals are genetically modified organisms due to high levels of DNA found in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. He analyzed 34 batches, revealing that some vials contain more DNA than mRNA, suggesting a potential integration into human DNA. This information has been communicated to key figures, including Robert Kennedy Jr. and Kash Patel. Additionally, there are concerns about underreporting DNA contamination in vaccine analyses. Despite my grammar, I take pride in being organic and non-GMO.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

KABOOM! Dr. Peter Kotlár, a Slovak physician, government commissioner, and MP drops bombshell investigation into DNA Contamination. The vaccinated are now officially GMO!! "I’m not afraid to say officially— a genetically modified organism. " Robert Kennedy Jr, Pam Bondi and Kash Patel has also been informed. @SecKennedy ------------------------------------------------------ "My primary task is to uphold the Constitution, and as a doctor, I have the duty and the right to protect the health of Slovak citizens. Yesterday, I also informed the U.S. Minister of Health and Human Services by letter, Mr. Robert Kennedy Jr., who confirmed receipt. Furthermore, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Kash Patel and Pamela Bondi, the U.S. Attorney General, were also informed. "34 batches from Pfizer and Moderna have been analyzed so far, which were stored according to the proper cold chain and only those that were used for the Slovak population during the COVID-19 epidemic. Today, I will present the most significant result of the analysis. " " The results of the analysis of all, I repeat, all analyzed batches proved that in every single vial, there is an extremely high amount of DNA, a vector that encodes the cassette for the synthesis of the S-protein, if not other proteins as well. Almost in the same amount as mRNA, DNA is also present there. In three cases, the DNA content is even higher than the mRNA. This can no longer even be considered an mRNA vaccine. This genetic code for the synthesis of the S-protein, this information stored in this DNA, is stable compared to mRNA, can integrate into human nuclear DNA, and subsequently, such a human organism becomes—I’m not afraid to say officially— a genetically modified organism. "

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Write up and full clip here https://www.aussie17.com/p/breaking-news-slovak-government-official

BREAKING NEWS: Slovak Government Official Claims DNA in Vaccines Turns People into "GMOs," Sparks Global Outrage "WE ARE NOT CORN!" aussie17.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Related https://t.co/HsmkrwLQRR

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

BOOM: Another group finds billions of copies of DNA in the vaccine. Note the 100 fold difference in Spike vs Vector sequences. This was also seen in @DJSpeicher work. This is how the scam works. They only target the KAN gene in PCR thus under reporting the DNA contam 100 fold. https://t.co/DJluZQvStB

@BThesnowdog - Bob TheSnowDog🐭🦝🚛🚜

@CoyoteSanctuary @Kevin_McKernan @P_J_Buckhaults @DJSpeicher @MaryanneDemasi @dystopian_DU @JesslovesMJK @stkirsch @hudikaha @CharlesRixey @Nick @BlackTomThePyr8 Not official! So far the best I can do: Quantitative Multiplex Real-Time PCR analysis of Moderna (Spikevax) and Pfizer (BNT162b2) vaccines https://www.10letters.org/CzechResearch.pdf @Kevin_McKernan

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Robert Kennedy Jr, Pam Bondi and Kash Patel *have* also been informed. My grammar is bad but at least I am organic / non-GMO.. https://t.co/gropnWfvLy

_aussie17
Posted - January 31, 2025 at 12:18 AM
Saved - January 31, 2025 at 11:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared the anguish of a father, Allen Martin, whose daughter died after receiving the mRNA vaccine. He challenges Senator Bill Cassidy to confront the details of her autopsy, highlighting the severe health issues she faced before her death. Martin expresses his anger towards those who dismiss the vaccine's risks, demanding accountability and a face-to-face confrontation about the value of his daughter's life. He emphasizes that her story is real and should not be ignored in discussions about vaccine safety.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Listen to this angry father whose daughter was killed by the mRNA vaccine: Allen Martin @AllenDMartin issues a challenge to @BillCassidy to view her daughter's autopsy report. These senators have no idea what they are getting into if they vote against Robert Kennedy Jr. -------------------------------------------- I would like him to come read about the thrombosis, the hypereosinophilia, the destruction of her organs, the bowel ischemia, the hell that my daughter went through before she ultimately took her last breath at 5.05 p.m. on November 9th, 2022, because she believed the BULLSHIT THAT HIS PHARMA WHORING ASS KEEPS SPREADING I WOULD INVITE HIM TO COME TELL ME TO MY FACE THAT THE VACCINE WAS SAFE AND THAT MY DAUGHTER'S LIFE WAS MEANINGLESS TO HIM! I WOULD LIKE HIM TO SAY THAT TO ME! -----------------------------------------

Video Transcript AI Summary
I invite Senator Bill Cassidy from Louisiana to review my daughter's autopsy report. He often uses hypothetical scenarios in his speeches, but I want him to confront the reality of my 18-year-old daughter, who died due to complications from the mRNA vaccine he claims is safe. Her autopsy reveals serious health issues, including thrombosis and organ damage, leading to her death on November 9, 2022. I challenge him to face me and explain how he can still assert the vaccine's safety and disregard the value of my daughter's life.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would like to do a personal invite for senator Bill Cassidy from Louisiana, to come review my daughter's autopsy report. He likes to use hypothetical 18 year old little girls in his speeches, and I'd like to give him a real 18 year old little girl that was killed by the mRNA poison that he calls safe. I would like him to come read about the thrombosis, the hypereosinophilia, the destruction of her organs, the bowel ischemia, the hell that my daughter went through before she ultimately took her last breath at 5:0:5 PM on November 9, 2022 because she believed the bullshit that his pharma whoring ass keeps spreading. I would invite him to come tell me to my face that the vaccine was safe and that my daughter's life was meaningless to him. I would like him to say that to me.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

@AllenDMartin @BillCassidy SOURCE TWEET AND FULL VIDEO HERE https://t.co/BZq4Yfgcvg

@AllenDMartin - Allen Martin

A message to @SenBillCassidy from the father of a NON-FICTITIOUS 18 year old girl that he is free to mention in his next pharma whoring speech. https://t.co/2rMVCdys9V

Video Transcript AI Summary
I invite Senator Bill Cassidy from Louisiana to review my daughter's autopsy report. He often references hypothetical cases in his speeches, but I want him to see the reality of my 18-year-old daughter, who suffered from severe health issues and ultimately died on November 9, 2022, after receiving the mRNA vaccine he claims is safe. I want him to confront the details of her suffering, including thrombosis and organ damage, and to explain to me why her life was insignificant to him.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would like to do a personal invite for senator Bill Cassidy from Louisiana, to come review my daughter's autopsy report. He likes to use hypothetical 18 year old little girls in his speeches, and I'd like to give him a real 18 year old little girl that was killed by the mRNA poison that he calls safe. I would like him to come read about the thrombosis, the hypereosinophilia, the destruction of her organs, the bowel ischemia, the hell that my daughter went through before she ultimately took her last breath at 505 PM on November 9, 2022 Speaker 1: because she believed the bullshit that his pharma whoring ass keeps spreading. I would invite him to come tell me to my face that the vaccine was safe and that my daughter's life was meaningless to him. I would like him to say that to me.
_aussie17
Posted - December 14, 2024 at 3:06 AM
Saved - December 15, 2024 at 1:54 PM

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Shocking clip of man standing in front of the Japan's Ministry of Health The cry of Mr. Koganei's soul after losing his wife to COVID vaccines, pleading with the staff of the Ministry of Health to come clean. So many people with blood on their hands! H/T:@JINKOUZOUKA_jp https://t.co/FG8YzmWcip

Video Transcript AI Summary
職員の皆さん、よく聞いてください。厚労省の職員が一番理解していることです。現在もワクチン接種が推奨されていますが、多くの人が苦しんでいます。中には辞めたいと思っている人もいるかもしれません。そうした人々は勇気を振り絞って立ち上がってほしいです。多くの人が亡くなっています。ワクチンを中止しましょう。 --- Employees, listen carefully. The Ministry of Health understands the situation best. Vaccination is still being recommended, but many are suffering. Some may even want to quit. Those individuals should muster the courage to stand up. Many people are dying. Let's stop the vaccinations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 入っ て い く 職 員 よ ー く 聞 け 一 番 わかっ て いる の は 厚 労 省 の 職 員 あんた れ だ ろう 今 も な お 、ワクチン 接種 を 推 奨 し て ど ん だけ 質 を 殺し て い く ん だ い い 加 減 に しろ 放浪 者 の 職 員 の 中 に 本 当 は 心 の 中 で もう 辞 め た い と 辛 い と 思っ て いる 人 間 も いる かもしれない むしろ い け ほ し い な ん と か そう いう 人 間 は 勇 気 を 振り 絞っ て 一 緒 に 立ち 上がっ て ほ し い 多 く の 人 間 が 死ん で ん だ 早速 ワクチン の 中 止 ワクチン を 中 止 し よう ワクチン を 学 生
_aussie17
Posted - November 29, 2024 at 7:21 PM
Saved - November 30, 2024 at 5:34 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a must-watch event in Perth discussing serious concerns about mRNA vaccine contamination. Julian Gillespie highlighted the alarming presence of synthetic DNA in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, calling it a national crisis that could alter human genomes. Senator Malcolm Roberts emphasized a peer-reviewed study linking increased mortality rates to booster vaccinations, urging for a Royal Commission. Professor Ian Brighthope warned of the potential catastrophic health effects, including aggressive cancers and immune disruptions, stemming from this contamination.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Must Watch : Stunning speeches in Perth, Western Australia yesterday evening on mRNA vaccine contamination! ----------------------------- Julian Gillespie @Double_Christ The synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna's COVID-19 drugs. This is not merely a scientific anomaly. It is a national crisis, one that affects every Australian family, every individual who placed their trust in our public health system. The findings of synthetic DNA contamination are now irrefutable. Ladies and gentlemen, this is not a regional issue, it is a global catastrophe. We are potentially dealing with a biogenic time bomb, a contamination capable of altering human genomes with devastating consequences forever. In Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, the TGA, the very body tasked with ensuring the safety of our medical products has failed us miserably. On October 18, the TGA released a statement dismissing these findings as misinformation. But this statement has been systematically dismantled in a thorough analysis co -authored by investigative journalist Rebekah Barnett, alongside scientists and legal experts. That analysis highlights 14 separate false or misleading claims made by the TGA. Who within the TGA has stepped forward to defend this statement? No one. No names, no credentials, just faceless bureaucracy hiding behind its logo. Senator Malcolm Roberts @MRobertsQLD : ...the mortality rate is now higher and sustainably higher. It's not going away. It's very closely correlated with injections, COVID injections, especially the booster. ...this is a peer-reviewed scientific paper, the correlation between Australian excess deaths by state and booster vaccinations by D.E. Allen, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney. The abstract, summarising the paper. The study explores the relationship by Australia's state between COVID booster vaccinations and excess deaths. Quite clear. There is evidence of a very strong correlation in ordinary least squares regression analysis. Cross-validation tests support the strength of the regression relationship. Results suggest that it would be worthwhile to explore these associations in greater depth, as it is an important public health issue. If they cared, they would do it. But they don't! I've said it before and I'll say it again. We need a Royal Commission now. I will continue until we hound these bastards down! We want justice, compensation, trust and accountability. Professor Ian Brighthope: @VirusFighterVi1 The concerns I have are based on well-established science. This is not theoretical or speculative. Decades of research have demonstrated the risks of foreign DNA integrating into human cells, leading to potentially catastrophic outcomes. The synthetic DNA contamination as detected in Australian vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines by Dr David Speicher presents risks of genomic instability, which can manifest as cancers, autoimmune diseases, mutations, and hereditary disorders. The vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles, toxic, which encapsulate synthetic DNA fragments. These nanoparticles deliver this DNA into most organs throughout the body, where the DNA has the potential to integrate into our own genetic material. Every organ in the body, from the brain to the heart, the ovaries, the testicles, the spleen, the liver, the eye, the ear, everywhere! The scientific literature makes it clear that this can lead to cancer and cancer development, immune system disruption, infertility, and more. Levels of contamination detected are up to 145 times the permissible limit. Some cases are extraordinary and far beyond what should be allowed in any medicinal product. We are already seeing evidence of these effects in real patients. Throughout the world, my colleagues and I are witness to a very disturbing trend that must be addressed. Patients who have been cancer-free for many years are suddenly relapsing with aggressive explosive cancers shortly after receiving booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. These cases show very rapid tumour growth following the booster administration. Very rapid tumour growth. The nature of these cancers is extremely unsettling. They are not just slow-growing progressive types we are accustomed to managing. They are aggressive, often presenting in advanced stages and affecting multiple organs by the time they are diagnosed. These are pancreatic cancers, a very, very deadly cancer. Ovarian cancers, difficult to detect until they are well advanced. Lung cancers and colorectal cancers. The colorectal cancers are showing explosive growth patterns, something we have never seen before. Something else that we haven't seen much of before are two very different cancers arising in the one organ. In fact, there have been cases of colorectal or bowel cancers in which there are two different cancers, two different genetically determined cancers in the large intestine. There has been a case report of a woman with breast cancer, three different cancers, two in one breast and one in the other. This is most unusual. These turbo cancers are emerging faster and more virulently than what we would expect in patients, including in patients who had otherwise been stable for many years. There is also a rise in blood cancers such as lymphomas and leukemias, which are sometimes appearing very shortly after vaccination. The delivery of the modified RNA in a lipid nanoparticle, something that would carry the drug into the depths of our brains, our ovaries, our testicles, our heart, virtually every organ in the body, should have been known by the authorities. The drug was never going to stay in the deltoid muscle. The mantra, safe and effective, was echoed endlessly, despite insufficient evidence. Even the manufacturers of vaccines have stated that we cannot manufacture vaccines safely because they're inherently unsafe. The claim of 95% efficacy was a statistical lie. In reality, these experimental injections have been associated with more deaths and injuries than any other pharmaceutical product in history. So, ladies and gentlemen, we have undergone the most dangerous, uncontrolled experiment ever on mankind.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Synthetic DNA contamination in Biogen and Moderna's COVID-19 vaccines poses a national crisis for Australia. Research confirms excessive levels of synthetic DNA, with findings indicating potential integration into human DNA and self-replication, raising concerns about long-term health risks. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) dismissed these findings as misinformation, but this has been challenged by experts. Mortality rates have risen post-vaccination, correlating with booster shots, and there is a disturbing trend of aggressive cancers emerging after vaccination. Despite over 60 million doses administered, health authorities have not monitored cancer trends, creating a critical oversight. Immediate action is needed to halt the distribution of contaminated products and prioritize public health over profit. The truth must prevail for the sake of future generations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The synthetic DNA contamination in Biogen Moderna's COVID-nineteen drugs. This is not merely a scientific anomaly. It is a national crisis, one that affects every Australian family, every individual who place their trust in our public health system. The findings of synthetic DNA contamination are now irrefutable. From Kevin McKernan, the former Director of Research for the Human Genome Project to David Speeches Australian Lab Work to Professor Philip Buchholz, groundbreaking cancer research in South Carolina, and now the world's leading molecular biologist and also Doctor of Medicine, Doctor. Didier Rouault together with Doctor. Jessica Rose, Doctor. David Wiseman, Doctor. Maria Gucci, Professor Koenig Bridget and with her German colleague, Doctor. Jurgen Kirchner. Each Each has confirmed the presence of excessive levels of synthetic DNA contamination in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-nineteen products, vials spanning the globe and therefore contamination affecting the global population. Kevin McKernan's research way back in February of 2023, 16th February to be exact, was when Kevin first transmitted to the world, Houston, we have a problem. On that day Kevin stepped forward to say in effect, the world appears to have been injected with excessive levels of synthetic DNA contamination. Doctor. Speicher corroborated these findings in Australian Bio's finding levels up to 150 times above old regulatory limits for naked DNA. Professor Koning confirmed similar numbers in Germany and Didier Rod's team recently found strikingly similar contamination in France. Ladies and gentlemen, this is not a regional issue, it is a global catastrophe. Let me share one particularly chilling finding from Professor Buchholt's research. This contamination is not merely present, it integrates into natural human DNA. Worse, recent studies that's by Kevin and his crew suggest it may also self replicate. I must say that term again and slowly, self replicate. This stuff is living independently. We are potentially dealing with a biogenic time bomb, contamination capable of altering human genomes with the devastating consequences forever. In Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, the TGA, the very body tasked with ensuring the safety of our medical products has failed us miserably. On October 18, the TGA released a statement dismissing these findings as misinformation. But this statement has been systematically dismantled in a thorough analysis co authored by investigative journalist Rebecca Barnett, alongside scientists and legal experts. That analysis highlights 14 separate false or misleading claims made by the TGA. And who within the TGA has stepped forward to defend this statement? No one. No names, no credentials, just facialist bureaucracy hiding behind its logo. The time for waging has long passed, the time for action is now. Right to your councils demand they protect their communities, join hands with those who are stepping forward often at great personal cost to speak the truth. Challenge the disgusting silence of Canberra and let the echo of your voices shake the walls of every institution that has failed us. We're not just fighting for answers, but the many contamination results, the need for answers has nearly passed. What is now required is acting. But in the process, this fight, this war to see on prevail and the sick and wounded and dead cared for and future generations predicted. We are fighting for the soul of our nation and for every generation that follows. Thank you. Speaker 1: I would like you all to give a warm welcome to 1 nation's senator for Queensland, senator Malcolm Roberts. Speaker 2: Death data itself, the number of deaths, doesn't really mean much if the population is growing or varying. You've got to look at mortality rates per 100,000 people to standardize against an increased population. The 21st century, the last 24 years, we've had mortality rates declining. 2020 was the lowest this century, 491 deaths per 100,000, people. That mortality took a sharp swing up in 2021 and 2022 because of the COVID injections. Not because of COVID, COVID injections. Queensland and Western Australia, we believe, were the only 2 country 2 places in the world where the people were injected before COVID arrived. So we know it wasn't COVID, it was the injections. We know that for sure. And what's worse? What's worse is that the mortality rate is not going back down. There's been a slight decrease, but but it's been sustained above the long term trend, above the upper range, and around about 8 to 10000 deaths. But the mortality rate has been is now higher and sustainably higher. It's not going away. It's very closely correlated with injections, COVID injections, especially the booster. I'm gonna read a quote from the paper called the correlation between this is a peer reviewed scientific paper. The correlation between Australian Excess Deaths by State and Booster Vaccinations by D. E. Allen, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney. The abstract summarizing the paper. The study explores the relationship by Australia's state between COVID boosted vaccinations and excess deaths. Quite clear. There is evidence of a very strong correlation in ordinary least squares regression analysis. Cross validation tests support the strength of the regression relationship. The results suggest that it would be worthwhile to explore these associations in greater depth, as it is an important public health issue. If they cared, they would do it. But they don't. I've said it before and I'll say it again. We need a Royal Commission now. I will continue until we hound these bastards down. We want justice, compensation, trust, and accountability. Why? Because humans care, we care, you care. That's why you're here tonight. Thank you so much. Speaker 1: Warm welcome to one of the finest men I've ever met, Professor Ian Brighthope. Speaker 3: Thank you very much, Graham, and thank you. I would never have dreamt that I'd be standing here in Perth speaking to a lovely group of people about a iatrogenic induced disease, a doctor induced disease. You have heard from the previous speakers what's been going on with regard to the history and to the vaccination programs and to the science, the politics, and the legal aspects. From my perspective, as a medical professional, retired medical professional come out of retirement to retrain doctors and nurses and healthcare professionals in what we can do to help the general public who are scrambling for help, who are getting sicker, and who are dying unnecessarily and prematurely. The concerns I have are based on well established science. This is not theoretical or speculative. Decades of research have demonstrated the risks of foreign DNA integrating into human cells, leading to potentially catastrophic outcomes. The synthetic DNA contamination as detected in Australian vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-nineteen vaccines by Doctor. David Spyker presents risks of genomic instability, which can manifest as cancers, autoimmune diseases, mutations and hereditary disorders. The vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles toxic, which encapsulates synthetic DNA fragments. These nanoparticles deliver this DNA into most organs throughout the body where the DNA has the potential to integrate into our own genetic material. Every organ in the body from the brain to the heart, the ovaries, the testicles, the spleen, the liver, the eye, the ear, everywhere. The scientific literature makes it clear that this can lead to cancer and cancer development, immune system disruption, infertility, and more. Levels of contamination detected are up to 145 times the permissible limit. Some cases are extraordinary and far beyond what should be allowed in any medicinal product. We are already seeing evidence of these effects in real patients. Throughout the world, my colleagues and I are witness to a very disturbing trend that must be addressed. Patients who have been cancer free for many years are suddenly relapsing with aggressive explosive cancers shortly after receiving booster doses of the COVID-nineteen vaccine. These cases show very rapid tumor growth following the booster administration, very rapid tumor growth. The nature of these cancers is extremely unsettling. They are not just slow growing progressive types we are accustomed to managing. They are aggressive, often presenting in advanced stages and affecting multiple organs by the time they are diagnosed. These are pancreatic cancers, a very, very deadly cancer. Ovarian cancers, difficult to detect until they are well advanced. Lung cancers and colorectal cancers. The colorectal cancers are showing explosive growth patterns something we have never seen before. Something else that we haven't seen much of before are 2 very different cancers arising in the one organ. And in fact, there have been cases of colorectal or bowel cancers in which there are 2 different cancers, 2 different genetically determined cancers in the large intestine. There has been a case report of a woman with breast cancer, 3 different cancers, 2 in one breast and one in the other. This is most unusual. These turbo cancers are emerging faster and more virulently than what we would expect in patients, including in patients who had otherwise been stable for many years. There's also a rise in blood cancers such as lymphomas and leukemias, which are sometimes appearing very shortly after vaccination. The public health authorities are reluctant to acknowledge the correlation. This is happening across the globe where the mRNA vaccines have been administered. Australia has administered more than 60,000,000 doses of these vaccines to over 20,000,000 people. Australia's governmental health authorities have chosen not to monitor new or emerging cancer trends following the widespread use of these vaccines. It is troubling that the Department of Health has not made data on cancer trends post vaccination publicly available. It is their responsibility to do so. This is a critical gap in public health oversight. Given the massive contamination levels of rogue residual DNA in the Australian vials, we must expect an ongoing rise in cancers and other genetic disorders in Australia. This issue is a potential long term health crisis waiting to happen. This matter must be taken seriously by every Australian. We must advocate for immediate public health responses. We need our health authorities to begin monitoring these trends. These gene based vaccines should never have been considered. The technology had never been proven to be effective in preventing Coronavirus infections. The technology had been shown to be unsafe long before it was used in 2021. The delivery of the modified RNA in a lipid nanoparticle, something that would carry the drug into the depths of our brains, our ovaries, our testicles, our heart, virtually every organ in the body should have been known by the authorities. The drug was never going to stay in the deltoid muscle. Furthermore, there was another contaminant in the drug, endotoxin. Endotoxin is what causes shock, and shock can lead to death. The contamination of these vaccines with synthetic DNA should have been caught and dealt with before any doses were administered. We must act urgently to mitigate the damage. The first step is to halt further distribution of these contaminated products. The mantra, safe and effective, was echoed endlessly despite insufficient evidence. Even the manufacturers of vaccines have stated that we cannot manage vaccines safely because they're inherently unsafe. The claim of 95% efficacy was a statistical lie. In reality, these experimental injections have been associated with more deaths and injuries than any other pharmaceutical product in history. So ladies and gentlemen, we have undergone the most dangerous uncontrolled experiment ever on mankind. So in closing, I'd like us all to remember the failures of the past must not be repeated. The truth must prevail over censorship and coercion. Somebody needs to speak to to the chair of the ABC. Who believes that the ABC always tells the truth? I used to admire the ABC for its truth telling, but it has failed. It has failed dismally, and it has built its information and its narrative on that one big lie. The truth must prevail over censorship and coercion, and the health of future generations depends on the actions we take today and tomorrow. We must prioritize human life and dignity over profits and politics.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

@Double_Christ WRITE UP, EMAILABLE FORMAT AND FULL CLIPS HERE https://www.aussie17.com/p/silence-in-the-face-of-truth-wa-government

Silence in the Face of Truth: WA Government Absent in The Great Debate on mRNA Vaccine DNA Contamination "Ladies and gentlemen, this is not a regional issue, it is a global catastrophe!" aussie17.com
_aussie17
Posted - November 25, 2024 at 6:48 PM
Saved - November 25, 2024 at 7:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I addressed the Northern Ireland Parliament, focusing on the vaccine-injured and bereaved. I believe the materials called vaccines were intentionally designed to harm recipients. With my background in pharmaceutical research, I argue that the COVID pandemic was fabricated, leading to harmful medical practices and unnecessary deaths. The so-called vaccines were rushed and toxic, created to injure and reduce fertility. I urge everyone to stop trusting those who lied to us and to speak out against ongoing threats to our freedoms and health.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨Dr Mike Yeadon's Address to Northern Ireland Parliament ----------------------------------- Hello, my name is Dr. Mike Yeadon, and in the next 15 minutes or so, I would like to address those of you who've been vaccine injured or bereaved, and also those of you who are involved in the political process in Northern Ireland, as well as anywhere else in the world who might hear me. At the end of this process, I hope you will believe what I'm going to tell you, which, shockingly, is that the materials masquerading as vaccines were designed intentionally to harm the people who received them. I'm probably the most qualified former pharmaceutical company research executive in the world speaking out on this matter, and since I spent my entire career in the business of working with teams designing molecules to be new potential medicines, I think I am qualified to comment on it, and that is my shocking judgement that has been only reinforced over the last almost four years since I first said it. I'll also have some suggestions for what we can do together to fight against the global crime which is ongoing. So, just a little bit about me so you can decide whether or not to believe me. So, I'm a career-long research scientist. I've worked all of my life in the pharmaceutical industry and in biotech. My first degree included a training in toxicology, so that's an understanding of how materials can injure human beings at a molecular level, and what the relationship is between the structure of them and the toxicity. In my second degree, a PhD, I did research in respiratory pharmacology, control of breathing and control of respiratory reflexes. So, and then after that, I joined the pharmaceutical industry in 1988, and I worked until very recently on new medicines for allergic and respiratory diseases. In my corporate career, I was for a long time responsible at Pfizer, then the biggest research-based drug company in the world, for everything to do with allergic and respiratory diseases in the research field. So, that was my responsibility. And in the last 10 years, after leaving in 2011, I was an independent and I became the founder and CEO of a biotech company, which was eventually acquired by Novartis, which was then the biggest drug company in the world. So, I have had a good career, and I was well regarded in the industry for my scientific acumen and judgments, until, of course, I started speaking out against the nonsense, the COVID pandemic, and especially the so-called vaccines. I've become persona non grata. It was my former colleagues after that. So, I'm well qualified to comment on the toxicological principles, properties of molecules, and the kind of effects you might see from certain structures. So, just very briefly, before I talk about the so-called vaccines, what happened in 2020? It's taken me a long time to get there, and I haven't made everybody happy with the decision I've reached, but there was not a pandemic or a public health emergency. I don't think there was anything at all, apart from lies, propaganda, fear-based information, fake diagnostic tests called PCR, and then, as it were, misattribution of real illnesses that people did have, which were called COVID when there was no such thing. But what happened, shockingly, was that after the World Health Organisation's chairman called a pandemic, which was not true. There's never been a pandemic. There won't be pandemics. They're immunologically impossible. But after he called them, many countries in the world changed radically their medical management practises for people in hospitals, also in care homes, and in the community. And very briefly, in hospitals, many people were sedated, had a plastic tube put down their airway, and unconscious, put on mechanical ventilators. I can assure you that is not ever an appropriate treatment for someone with an influenza-like illness, whatever you might think COVID was. But that would not be something you would do, and if applied to frail and elderly people, they will die in large numbers, which they did. So that was the first crime. It's not a mistake. There are no mistakes here. Mistakes were not made. They were told to do this by figures at supranational level. We don't know exactly who, but we know this because these mad procedures changed in many countries all at the same time. So that's hospitals, in care homes, assisted living, old-age people's homes, and so on. Many people were given drugs like Midazolam, which is an injectable form of a drug like Valium, a sedative. But they were also given injections of pain-relieving drugs like morphine, even if they weren't in pain. My PhD was in the field of understanding what opiate drugs like morphine do to the respiratory reflux, and I can assure you it suppresses and suppresses it and depresses it. So if you give an elderly person on their own an injection of Midazolam, they will become sedated and sleepy, and if you give them an injection of morphine, their breathing will slow. I can tell you, it's absolutely forbidden to give a person those two drugs together, those two drug classes together, unless they are under intense ongoing medical monitoring. And the reason is they're likely to fall asleep and stop breathing. That, of course, is what happened. So that's hospitals and care homes. Your relatives were killed by the medical procedures that were imposed. Now, it's quite possible early on that not everybody involved knew what was happening, but I'm afraid after a few days, you'd have to be a blockhead not to realise that it was what you were doing to your charges, your patients, that was resulting in their deaths. So I've completely lost any trust in the medical profession because virtually no one has spoken up four and a half years later. This happens to lots of people. If you listen to the recordings, heartbreaking recordings given to the Scottish COVID Enquiry, I think that's probably the only place where there's been an official taking of evidence from people. And what I just described is exactly what happens to lots of people's relatives and no doubt happens to some people in Northern Ireland as well. It certainly happens in England. There were worse things as well. People in the community were deprived of medical care that would have saved their lives. And there's plenty of evidence to say that not being given antibiotics when they had incipient bronchial pneumonia also killed thousands, possibly tens of thousands of people. And there, ladies and gentlemen, was your pandemic. All of those deaths were attributed to COVID and you were told this is this terrible pandemic, you need to lock down, wear masks, do what you're told. Nothing was happening at all apart from medical murder and propaganda from the television and the newspaper, politicians and many public, well-known public figures who are doing what they were told. So of course one conclusion I'm going to come to later is stop listening to liars. The people who've lied to you shouldn't listen to them ever again. Stop listening to them today. But for me, I think the worst thing, because it comes out of my industry and because it's so deliberate, it requires such a lot of forethought, are the so-called vaccines. Now we were told there was this new infectious disease, so far so good ladies and gentlemen, but then they said don't worry we'll rustle up a vaccine and they did so at least in about 10 months, something like that. I can tell you after spending a career in this industry, you can no more make a baby in one month with nine women than you can make a complicated biological product in 10 months. It cannot be done. It was not done. They did something else. They created materials which were essentially injected poisons. They were not vaccines. There was never anything to vaccinate against. And when you've listened to what I've just told you, you know that must be true because you can't do something in 10 months that normally takes 6 to 12 years. Medicines are not put together randomly. They are built. And they're built by people who are discussing with colleagues, work out what kind of materials, what kind of structures, what kind of formulations, what kind of doses you would need to add in order to hit a particular molecular target to have a chance of a particular therapeutic goal being reached without unacceptable side effects. That's called rational design. And that is my whole career, ladies and gentlemen, from my undergraduate days to today. So when I look at the design of the medicine, whatever kind it is, and look at the design on paper and its composition structures and so on, it is as if I'm looking over the shoulder of the designer, someone like me, someone with my qualifications designed these things. So when I look at them, I'm looking over the shoulder of the designer and I can discern something of what their objectives were, what were they trying to do? And I came quickly to the conclusion that they wanted to bring about toxicity that would injure, kill and reduce fertility. There aren't any other alternatives. And remember, there was no public health emergency. So I'll just give you three examples. I'm not going to be too scientific, but three things so you can check them. The objective of these so-called gene-based vaccines was to inject you with a genetic sequence for something called spike protein. Now, it doesn't really matter what spike protein is, if it's real, where it came from. The point is, it's a genetic sequence for a protein that doesn't belong in your body. It's non-self, it's foreign. Your immune system is a wonderful work of God and nature. It distinguishes self, things that are meant to be inside you and are fine from anything else, foreign, non-self. If you inject a person with a genetic sequence that instructs your body to become a factory for some protein that doesn't belong in you, your immune system will detect that and it will attack every cell that's done that instruction and kill it. Now, these materials, when injected in your arm, didn't stay in your arm, they travelled around your heart, your lungs, your kidneys, your brain, your ovaries. And in every place it landed, if it was taken up and expressed, your body registered that as foreign invasion and it attacks and kills every cell doing it. There is no other possible consequence from doing that. So that's step one and no one can argue that's not what they did. That is the design of them. It also picks a particular protein. I'm not really sure where spike protein came from, if it's really real, but proteins like the one they claim was encoded in these gene-based materials are known to be toxic. There are loads of experiments, lots of published experiments, showing that proteins like that one cause blood coagulation, damaged nerves, damaged heart tissue. So they injected you with something that would make your body make a protein that doesn't belong there, knowing axiomatically, automatically, unavoidably, your immune system would attack that. It would be like rejecting an organ transplant. Your body would say, that's foreign, got to go, uses your immune system to kill it. And then they also inject you with something that's inherently toxic. So if it got out into your body or wherever it was made, it would harm you. And I've got a third one that cannot be argued with. At least the mRNA products from Pfizer and Moderna were encapsulated in something called lipid nanoparticles. It's really a blob of fat, complicated, technical blob of fat, that's what it is after all. And what that material did is allowed your injection to glide all around your body across all biological barriers and get everywhere in your body. So of course, it's not what you would want, is it? For something that they told you was inhaled into your nose and lungs. But no, it went all around your body, into your brain, blood vessels. But in particular, I need to tell you, there were publications that are now more than 10 years old in peer-reviewed journal articles. I'm sceptical about whether they're always very honest, but there were peer-reviewed journal articles showing that lipid nanoparticles were recognised over a decade ago of having a particular property, which you're not going to like to hear, which shocked me when I learned it. They tend to deposit their payload into the ovaries. That is exactly what happened with these injected materials. There was at least one study performed with the Pfizer agents, with the Japanese regulatory authorities. Lo and behold, the material accumulated in the ovaries of the test animals. That is what's happened, ladies and gentlemen, every woman and girl injected with these materials. Remember what I said about designing molecules to do things deliberately with objectives in mind? They picked lipid nanoparticles, knowing they accumulate the payload in ovaries. It's not an accident. Mistakes were not made. So I tell you, as a professional who spent his whole honest scientific career in an industry I did not realise was corrupt, trying to make experimental medicines for respiratory and allergy diseases, that my experience tells me that there are multiple independent, unnecessary and obvious mechanisms of toxicity built into these so-called vaccines. And then by sheer luck, all four companies, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca and Pfizer, all chose basically the same formula for their so-called vaccines. That would never happen if it was real. For a start, I would call my opposite numbers and say, we should do different things because if something goes wrong, if we're wrong in an assumption, all of the so-called vaccines will fail for the same reason. We should do different things. It's called diversification. But no, they all did the same things because they're just lying. They were making intentionally dangerous material, passing them off as vaccines to having you and your children. And that's what they did. Of course, I didn't get injected and neither did my children and most of my relatives. Some of them didn't believe me. I'm afraid they've been injected too. So big picture, what happens, I think from the research I've done, and of course, I'm an expert in research and development, not in politics, but I believe that very wealthy people, the kind of people who run foundations with names, have planned, as have their antecedents for a couple of generations, to take over the world, to remove the freedoms of ordinary people like us that they regard as useless eaters. They don't want us around anymore. And their intention is to strip us of our freedoms by persuading us that there are very frightening events occurring in the world, and we need them to lead us to safety. There are documents you can find from a group called the Club of Rome, who in the late 1960s were commissioned by some of these people who run the nameless global foundations that have hundreds of billions of pounds of worth. They were asked to come up with scenarios that would produce challenges for countries that couldn't be solved by countries on their own, so they would have to look outwards and upwards to supranational solutions. Now guess what? The two things they came up with, pandemics of infectious diseases, which I know as an immunologist are not possible and have never happened. The other thing they said to account for or plan for were climate change crises. I've done enough research now, ladies and gentlemen, I've spoken to people who have spent as long in climate atmospheric research as I have in pharmaceutical R&D, and they have explained to me, and I understand very well, that there's all of this nonsense about carbon dioxide, global boiling, net zero. It's all a complete scam from the same people who bought you the Covid scam and the dangerous injections. It's the same people. They want one world government, they want to be deprived of your liberty, and then I'm afraid I think they will kill us using these injections because they're going to do it again. All over the world, factories to make mRNA-based materials are being thrown up, billions of doses are being made, and if we let them they will sicken in our arms and people will sicken and die. So those of you who have been injured or bereaved, in my mind no blame whatsoever attaches to you. How could you know that people you trusted and thought you could trust were lying to you? Well, you didn't know, but if you let them inject you again, you have no sympathy for me because they have lied to you, you've been injured or killed, and I've explained to you that they're liars and they have attacked us. So if you go along with it, you cannot be saved. All we need to do is enough of us continue to speak out about this and say we're not having it anymore, get lost, don't listen to liars anymore. People who've lied to you forfeit their trust forever, in my view, and so anyone who's in the political process, for example in Northern Ireland looking at this so-called public health bill, which if you pass it would allow these supranational criminals to take you from your house, to inject you by force if necessary, they are aiding and abetting a global crime. And I saw someone online say recently that if you pass that legislation, I don't think it'd be unreasonable to interpret that as an act of war. It's as serious as that. So politicians, you may well be under pressure from shadowy figures, but if you go along with it and hope for like an easier time of it, you will have unlocked the doors of hell and pushed everybody in it and you as long with it as well. So this is your time to do what I'm doing, which is to speak out no matter the consequences. I say to you if you're frightened about what happens, if you speak out, you should be absolutely terrified about what's going to happen if you don't. So really that's all I've got to say. I do think these criminals are going to do it again, they're continuing to threaten us with pandemics like bird flu, monkey pox and so on. It is all nonsense. Stop listening to liars right now. Put things right between you, the people you love, and between you and God if you haven't already. And for goodness sake, be one of the people who speaks out no matter what the consequences, because if you don't, we'll lose our freedom and then our lives. Thank you.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hello, I’m Dr. Mike Geadon. I want to address those affected by vaccine injuries and those involved in politics. I believe the materials labeled as vaccines were intentionally designed to harm recipients. With a career in pharmaceutical research, I assert that the COVID-19 response was not a genuine pandemic but rather a series of deliberate actions leading to unnecessary deaths through harmful medical practices. The so-called vaccines were rushed and contain toxic components that can harm the body, including the ovaries. This was not an accident; it was a calculated decision. We must stop trusting those who have lied to us and resist any further harmful measures. Politicians must recognize the gravity of passing legislation that enables such actions. It’s crucial to speak out against these injustices to protect our freedoms and lives. Thank you.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. My name is doctor Mike Geadon. And in Speaker 1: the next 15 minutes or so, I would like to address those of Speaker 0: you who've been vaccine, injured, or bereaved, and also those of you who are involved in the political process in Northern Ireland as well as anywhere else in the world who might hear me. At the end of this process, I hope you will believe what I'm going to tell you, which shockingly is that the materials masquerading as vaccines were designed intentionally to harm the people who received them. I'm probably the most qualified former pharmaceutical company research executive in the world speaking out on this matter. And since I spent my entire career in the business of working with teams designing molecules to be new potential medicines, I think I am qualified to comment on it, and that is my shocking judgment that has been only reinforced over the last, almost 4 years since I first said it. I'll also have some suggestions for what we can do together to, fight against Speaker 1: the global crime, which is ongoing. So just a little bit about me so you can decide whether or not to believe me. Speaker 0: So I'm a career long research scientist. I've worked all of my life in the pharmaceutical industry and in biotech. My first degree included a training in toxicology. So it's an understanding of how materials can injure human beings at a molecular level and what the relationship is between the structure of them and and the toxicity. In my second degree of PhD, I did research in respiratory pharmacology, control of breathing and and control of respiratory reflexes. So, and then after that, I joined as a pharmaceutical industry in 1988, and I worked until very recently, Speaker 1: on new medicines for allergic and respiratory diseases. In my corporate career, I was, for Speaker 0: a long time, responsible at Pfizer, then the biggest research based drug company in the world for everything to do with allergic and respiratory, diseases in the research field. So that was my responsibility. And in the last 10 years after leaving in 2011, I was an independent, and I became the founder and CEO of a biotech company, which is eventually acquired by Novartis, which was then the biggest drug company in the world. So I have had a, Speaker 1: a good career, and Speaker 0: I was well regarded in the industry, for my scientific acumen and judgments, until, of course, I started speaking out against the nonsense, the COVID pandemic, and especially the so called vaccines. I've become persona non grata. It was my former colleagues after that. So I'm well qualified to comment on the, topological principles, properties of molecules, and, you know, the kind of effects you might see from from certain structures. Speaker 1: So just very briefly before I talk about the so called vaccines, what happened in 2020? Speaker 0: It's taken me a long time Speaker 1: to get there, and Speaker 0: I haven't made I've made, or not I've not made anybody happy with the decision I've reached, but there was not a pandemic or a public health emergency. I don't think there was anything at all apart from lies, propaganda, you know, fear based information, fake diagnostic test called PCR, and then as it were misattribution of real illnesses that people did have, which were called COVID when there was no such there was no such thing. But what happened, shockingly, was that after the World Health Organization's, chairman called a pandemic, which was not true. There's never been a pandemic. There won't be pandemics. They're immunologically impossible. But after he calls them, many countries in the world changed radically their medical management practices for people in hospitals, also in care homes and in the community. And very briefly, in hospitals, many people were sedated, had a plastic tube put down their airway and unconscious put on mechanical ventilators. I can assure you that is not ever an appropriate treatment for someone with a an influenza like illness, whatever you might think COVID was. But that would not be something you would do. And if given if applied to frail and elderly people, they will die in large numbers, which they did. So that was the first, crime. It's it's not a mistake. Speaker 1: There are no mistakes here. Mistakes were not made. They were told to do this by figures at supranational level. Speaker 0: We don't know exactly who. But we know this because these mad procedures changed in many countries all at the same time. So that's hospitals, in care homes, you know, assisted living, old age people's homes, and so on. Many people were given drugs like midazolam, which is an injectable form of a drug like Valium, a sedative. But they were also given injections or pain relieving drugs like morphine even if they weren't in pain. My PhD was in the field of understanding what opioid drugs like morphine due to the respiratory reflux. And I can assure you, it suppresses and suppresses and depresses it. So if you Speaker 1: give an elderly person on their own an injection of Midazolam, they will become sedated and sleepy. And if Speaker 0: you give them an injection of morphine, their breathing will slow. I can tell you it's absolutely forbidden to give a person those 2 drugs together, those 2 drug classes together unless they answer intense ongoing medical monitoring. And the reason is they're very likely to fall asleep and stop breathing. That, of course, is what happened. So that's hospitals and care homes. Your relatives were killed by the medical procedures that were imposed. Speaker 1: Now it's quite possible early on that not everybody involved knew what was happening, but I'm afraid after a few days, you have Speaker 0: to be a blockhead not to realize that it was what you were doing to your charges, your patients that were resulting in their deaths. So I've completely lost any trust in the medical profession because virtually no one has spoken up four and a half years later. This happens to lots of people. If you listen to the recordings, heartbreaking recording is given to the Scottish COVID inquiry. I think that's probably the only place where there's been an official taking of evidence from people. And what I just described is exactly what happened to lots of people's relatives. I know that happens to some people in Northern Ireland as well. It certainly happens in England. There were worse things as well. People in the community were deprived of medical care that would have saved their lives. And there's plenty of evidence to say that not being given antibiotics when they had incipient bronchial pneumonia also killed thousands, possibly tens of thousands of people. And there, ladies and gentlemen, was your pandemic. All of those deaths were attributed to COVID, and you were told this is a terrible pandemic. You need to lock down. Wear masks. Do what you're told. Nothing was happening at all apart from medical murder and propaganda from the television and the newspaper, politicians, and many public, well known public figures who are doing what they were told. So, of course, one conclusion events come to you later is stop listening to liars. The people who've lied to you shouldn't listen to them ever again. Stop listening to them today. But the for me, I think the worst thing because it comes out of my industry and because I it's so deliberate. It requires such Speaker 1: a loss of forethought of the so called vaccines. And we Speaker 0: were told there was this new infectious disease. So far, so good, ladies and gentlemen. But then they said, don't worry. We'll ruffle up a vaccine. And they did so at least in about 10 months, something like that. I can tell you after spending a career in this industry, you can no more make Speaker 1: a baby in 1 month with 9 women than you Speaker 0: can make a complicated biological product in 10 months. It cannot be done. It was not done. So it is something else. They created materials which were essentially injected poisons. They were not vaccines. There was never anything to vaccinate against. And when you've listened to what I've just told you, you know that must be true because you can't do something in 10 months that normally takes 6 to 12 years. Medicines are not put together randomly. They're they're built, and they're built by people who discussing with colleagues, work out what kind of materials, what kind of structures, what kind of formulations, what kind of doses you would need to add in order to hit a particular molecular target. So have a chance of a particular therapeutic goal being reached without unacceptable side effects. That's called rational design. And that is my whole career, ladies and gentlemen, from my undergraduate days to today. So when I look at the design of the medicine, whatever kind it is, and look at the design on paper and its composition, structures, and so on, it is as if I'm looking over the shoulder of the designer. Someone like me. Someone with my qualifications design these things. The one I look at them, I'm looking over the shoulder of the designer, and I can discern something of what their objectives were. What were they trying to do? Speaker 1: And I came quickly to the conclusion that they wanted to bring about toxicity that would injure, kill, and reduce fertility. There are no any other alternatives. And remember, there was no public health emergency. So I'll just Speaker 0: give you three examples. I'm not gonna be too scientific, but three things so you can check them. The objective of these so called gene based vaccines was to inject you with a genetic sequence for something called spike protein. Now it doesn't really matter what spike protein is, if it's real, where it came from. The point is it's a genetic sequence for a protein that doesn't belong in your body. It's non self. It's foreign. Your immune system is a wonderful work of God and nature. Speaker 1: It Speaker 0: distinguishes self, things that meant to be inside you and are fine from anything else, foreign non self. If you inject a person with a genetic sequence that instructs your body to become a factory for some protein that doesn't belong in you, your immune system will detect that, and it will attack every cell that's done that instruction and Speaker 1: kill it. Now these materials, when injected Speaker 0: in your arm, didn't stay in your arm. They traveled around your heart, your lungs, your kidneys, your brain, your ovaries. And in every place it landed, if it was taken up and expressed, your body registered that as foreign invasion, and it attacks and killed every cell doing it. There is no other possible consequence from doing that. So that's that's step 1, and no one can argue that's not what they did. That is the design of them. They also picked a particular protein. I'm not really sure where spike protein came came from if it's really real. But proteins like the one they claim was encoded in the gene based materials are known to be toxic. There are loads of experiments, lots of published experiments showing that proteins like that one caused blood triangulation, damaged nerves, damaged heart tissue. So they injected you with something that would make your body make protein that doesn't belong there knowing axiomatically, automatically, unavoidable, your immune system will attack that. It would be like rejecting an organ transplant. Your body would say that's foreign. Gotta go. Use your immune system to kill it. And then they also inject you with something that's inherently toxic. So if it got out into your body or wherever it was made, it would harm you. And I've got a third one that cannot be argued with. At least the mRNA products from Pfizer and Moderna were encapsulated in something called lipid nanoparticles. It's really a blob of fats, Complicated technical blob of fat. That's what it is after all. And what that materials did is allowed your injection to glide all around your body across all biological barriers and get everywhere in your body. Because it's not what you would want, is it, for something that they told you was inhaled into your nose and lungs. But, no, it went all around your body into your brain, blood vessels. But in particular, I need to tell you. There were publications that are now more than 10 years old in peer reviewed journal articles. I'm skeptical about whether they're always very honest. But there were peer reviewed journal articles showing that lipid nanoparticles were recognized over a decade ago Speaker 1: of having a particular property, which you're not going Speaker 0: to like to hear, which shocked me when I learned it. It tends to deposit their payload into the ovaries. That is exactly what happened with these injected materials. There was at least one study performed with the Pfizer agents, with the Japanese regulatory authorities. Low and behold, the material accumulated in the ovaries of the test animals. That is what's happened, ladies and gentlemen. Every woman and girl injected with these materials. Remember what I said about designing molecules to do things deliberately with objectives in mind? They picked lipid nanoparticles knowing they accumulate the payload in ovaries. It's not an accident. Mistakes were not made. So I tell you as a professional who spent his whole honest scientific career in an industry I did not realize was corrupt, trying to make experimental medicines for respiratory and allergy diseases, that my experience tells me that there are multiple independent, unnecessary, and obvious mechanisms of toxicity built into these so called vaccines. And then, by sheer luck, all four companies, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, all shows basically the same formula for their so called vaccines. That would never happen if it was real. For a start, I would call my opposite numbers and say, we should do different things because if something goes wrong, if we're wrong in an assumption, all of the all of the so called vaccines will fail for the same reason. We should do different things. It's called diversification. But now they all did the same things because they're just lying. They were making intentionally dangerous material, passing them off as vaccines, jabbing you and your children. Speaker 1: And that's what they did. Of course, I didn't get injected, neither did my children and most of my relatives. Some of them didn't believe me. I'm afraid they've been injected too. So big picture, what happens, I think, from the research I've done, and, Speaker 0: of course, I'm an expert in research and development, not in politics. But I believe that very wealthy people, the kind of people who run foundations with names, have plans as have their antecedents for a couple of generations to to take over the world, to remove the freedoms of ordinary people like us that they regard as useless leaders. Speaker 1: They don't want us around anymore. And their Speaker 0: intention, is to strip us of our freedoms by persuading us that there were very frightening events occurring in the world, and we need them to lead us to safety. There are documents you can find from a group called The Club of Rome, who in the late 19 sixties were commissioned by some of these people who run NAMES Global Foundations that have 100 of 1,000,000,000 of pounds of worth. They were asked to come up with scenarios that would produce challenges to countries that couldn't be solved by countries on their own. So they would have to look outwards and upwards to supranational solutions. Now guess what? The two things they came up with. Pandemics of infectious diseases, which I know as an immunologist are not possible and have never happened. Speaker 1: The other thing they said, to account for or plan for were climate change crises. Speaker 0: I've done enough research in our relations center, but I've spoken to people who have spent as long in climate atmospheric research as I have in pharmaceutical r and d. And they have explained to me, and I understand very well, that there's all of this nonsense about carbon dioxide, global boiling, net zero. It's it's all a complete scam from the same people who bought you the COVID scam and the dangerous injections. It's the same people. They want one world government. They want to be deprived of your liberty. And then I'm afraid, I think they will kill us using these injections because they're going to do it again. All over the world, factories to make mRNA based materials are being thrown up. Billions of doses are being made. And if we let them, they will sicken in our arms, and people will sicken and die. So those of you who have been injured or bereaved, in my mind, no blame whatsoever attaches to you. How could you know that people you trusted and thought you could trust were lying to you? Well, that you didn't know. But if you let them inject you again, you have no sympathy from me because they have lied to you, been in church, or killed. And I've explained to you that they're liars and they have taxes. So if you go along with it, it cannot be saved. All we need to do is enough of us to continue to speak out about this and say, we're not having it anymore. Get lost. So don't listen to lies anymore. People who've lied to you, forfeit their trust forever in my view. And so anyone who's in Speaker 1: the political process, for example, in Northern Ireland looking at this so called public health bill, which if you pass it, would allow the supernational criminals to take you from your house, to reject you, by force if necessary. They are aiding and abetting a global crime. And, I saw someone online say recently that if you pass that legislation, I don't think it'd be unreasonable to interpret that as an act of war. It's as serious as that. So politicians, you may well be under pressure from shadowy figures. But if you go along with it, and Speaker 0: I hope for, like, an easier time of it, you will have you will have enabled unlock the doors of hell and pushed everybody in it, and you as long with it as well. So this is your time to do what I'm doing, which is to speak out no matter the consequences. I say to you, if you're frightened about what happens, if you speak out, you should be absolutely terrified about what's going to happen Speaker 1: if you don't. So, Speaker 0: really, that's all I've got to say. You know, I do think these criminals are gonna do it again. They're continuing to threaten us with pandemics like bird flu, monkeypox, and so on. It is all nonsense. Stop listening to liars right now. Put things right between you, the people you love, and between you and God, if you haven't already. And for goodness sake, be one of the people who speaks out no matter what the consequences because if you turn us, we'll lose our freedom and then our lives. Thank you.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Emailable format https://www.aussie17.com/p/dr-mike-yeadons-address-to-northern

Dr Mike Yeadon's Address to Northern Ireland Parliament "I came quickly to the conclusion that they wanted to bring about toxicity that would injure, kill and reduce fertility." aussie17.com
_aussie17
Posted - November 18, 2024 at 9:25 PM
Saved - November 19, 2024 at 7:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I addressed the overwhelming health crisis in Australia, highlighting the urgent need for investigation into unexplained sickness affecting many citizens. I emphasized that the Australian people deserve answers, especially regarding alarming findings about DNA contamination in Pfizer's vaccine. Experts warn that even a small number of contaminants can lead to serious health issues, yet the TGA has dismissed these concerns without proper analysis. This lack of action is a failure to protect the public, and I believe it is a matter of grave national importance.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Australian Outrage Mounts as Citizens Seek Answers Following Member of Parliament Russell Broadbent's @BroadbentMP Stunning DNA Contamination Address "...health care workers are still overwhelmed in large part by unprecedented and unexplained levels of sickness right across the country. Why isn't anyone investigating this phenomenon??" "The Australian people deserve answers. Today I rise to speak as a matter of grave national importance, one that has until now been met with silence by those who should be taking decisive action. " "Experts have determined that as few as three to 10 molecules of the SV-40 promoter and enhancer sequences contaminating Pfizer's product can potentially trigger cell mutations leading to cancer, yet Dr Speicher's analysis of Australia's vials detected billions of these molecules in a single dose. For the TGA to dismiss these concerns outright, without credible testing or scientific analysis, is a failure of the duty of the Australian people."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Australia's healthcare system, supported by dedicated workers, is facing unprecedented challenges, including rising sickness levels among healthcare professionals. Concerns have been raised regarding synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, with findings indicating contamination levels far exceeding safety limits. A report co-authored by 52 scientists highlights the potential risks, including cancer mutations from minimal contamination. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has been criticized for dismissing these concerns without proper investigation, using inadequate testing methods. The Port Hedland Council has called for a suspension of these vaccines following alarming cancer trends in their community. Urgent action is needed to ensure the safety of all Australians, invoking the precautionary principle until independent testing can confirm or dispel these contamination claims. Transparency and accountability are essential to protect public health.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The motion be agreed to. I call the member for Monash. Thank you, deputy speaker. Deputy speaker, Australia's world class has a world class health system, Medicare. The system is the backbone of that system is a dedication of our highly skilled, hardworking health care workforce. These health care workers were are subject to intense conditions that wouldn't be acceptable in any other industry. But day in, day out, they they get on with their job and they do it wonderfully. They bore the brunt of the pandemic and even though overwhelmed with immense pressure and unknown variables, healthcare workers stood as our first line of defence. But 4 years on, healthcare workers are still overwhelmed in large part by unprecedented and unexplained levels of sickness right across the country. Why isn't anyone investigating this phenomenon? The Australian people deserve answers. Today, I wrote to speak to a matter of grave national importance, one that has until now been met with silence by those who should be taking decisive action. My recent correspondence to the prime minister highlights alarming findings in synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna COVID 19 products. Deep detected levels up to 145 times above the CGA's own stated limits. Let me assure you I did not write those letters lightly. My letters were accompanied by science summary co authored by 52 eminent scientists, including Doctor David Speaker, a Canadian virologist, who authorized who authored the report investigating DNA contamination in the Australian COVID 19 Pfizer and Moderna vials Professor Angus Dalglish, one of the world's leading oncologists Emeritus Professor Wendy Hoy Emeritus Professor Robert Clancy Professor Alexandra Herrion Claude and Kevin McKernan, former research director of the Human Genome Project. These distinguished individuals put their names and reputations on the line, attesting to the overwhelming evidence of synthetic DNA contamination in these vaccines and the risk posed to Australians. The science summary speaks directly to the catastrophic implications of this contamination. Experts have determined that as few as 3, to 10 molecules of the s bbordi promoter and enhancer sequences contaminating Pfizer's product can potentially trigger cell mutations leading to cancer if doctor Speaker's analysis of Australia's files detected billions of these molecules in a single dose. For the TGA to dismiss these concerns outright, without credible testing or scientific analysis of failure of duty of the Australian people, even as the evidence was brought to the attention of the prime minister and subsequently passed the health minister, We received no scientific denial nor testing, no thorough investigation, only a letter from the minister Butler's office referring to the TGA statement asserting the findings, as so called misinformation. The TGA statement has since been revealed as misleading and wholly unreliable containing at least 14 false assertions as documented in the comprehensive analysis, coauthored by investigative journalist Rebecca Barnett and leading scientific experts. We are at a crucial juncture this day. The TGA is yet to perform appropriate tests to confirm or deny doctor Speaker's report findings. The TGA has been using a testing method for DNA contamination that grossly undermeasures the levels of DNA contamination, a method Moderna itself deems inadequate for the purpose in its own patent documents for these drugs. No further evidence has been presented to allay the concerns of scientists or the public. Instead, we see avoidance, misleading statements, and a complete lack of accountability from our regulators. I must also draw attention to the extraordinary efforts made by the town of Port Hedland Council, who after hearing from cancer expert Professor Angus Dalglesian from their own community experiencing 7 fold increase in deaths, passed a historic motion calling for the suspension of these products and to the TGA to conduct independent testing. They took a stand, not out of political agenda, but from the ethical duty to protect our community. It was the testimony of professor Dalgleish observing an alarming increase in aggressive cancers among vaccinated individuals that gave way to this decision. Professor Dalgleish's observations are echoed by other medical professionals worldwide who are documenting what they term turbocancers, cancers of an aggressive nature never seen at this scale before. For the health and safety of all Australians, I call upon this house and the prime minister to act now, invoke the precautionary principle, and suspend these products until independent testing can confirm or dispel these contamination findings. Australia cannot afford the risk of another crisis, one that would eclipse even the devastating dolunomide disaster. We must protect the health of all Australians, and that requires transparency, accountability, and action.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

@BroadbentMP WRITE UP + MORE HERE https://www.aussie17.com/p/australian-outrage-mounts-as-citizens

Australian Outrage Mounts as Citizens Seek Answers Following Member of Parliament Russell Broadbent's Stunning DNA Contamination Address "For the TGA to dismiss these concerns outright, without credible testing or scientific analysis, is a failure of the duty of the Australian people!" aussie17.com
_aussie17
Posted - November 2, 2024 at 8:45 PM
Saved - November 2, 2024 at 9:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been following the concerning trend of four teenage Cross-Country athletes in Tennessee who have died in the past six months. This situation is alarming for many in the medical community, especially cardiologists. There are growing questions about the potential link between these tragic events and the COVID vaccine, particularly regarding its effects on young athletes' hearts. It's crucial that we explore all possible questions and avenues for understanding as we seek answers to this pressing issue.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨 🤯🤯 Mainstream media NewsChannel5 asks if COVID vaccine caused problems in the heart of young athletes The deaths of four teenage Cross-Country athletes in the last six months in Tennessee are raising red flags in the medical community, particularly among cardiologists. ..It certainly is concerning. It's concerning to us as physicians, as parents, as teachers and coaches... ...There have been questions raised about the COVID vaccine and the impact on the heart and if that is manifesting in young athletes. Is that a question that needs to be asked? .. ...I think we should ask every question that we can think of at this moment and we're not going to discount anything as we wait for answers... H/T: @resilient333

Video Transcript AI Summary
Concerns are rising in the medical community following the deaths of four teenage runners in the last six months, all of whom experienced sudden heart failure while running. Questions are being raised about whether this trend is unique to Tennessee or seen elsewhere. The exact causes of these deaths remain unclear, prompting discussions about various factors, including the potential impact of the COVID vaccine on young athletes' hearts. It's crucial to explore all possibilities without dismissing any concerns. In the meantime, parents are encouraged to keep their children active in sports, starting with a thorough preseason sports physical each year to reassess family history and any new symptoms.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It certainly is concerning. It's concerning to us as physicians, as parents, as teachers and coaches. Speaker 1: Doctor English Black has made studying the finest details of the human heart her life's work, but she doesn't need any diagnostic tool to spot a troubling trend. Speaker 2: When you hear that 4 teenage runners have died in our area in the last 6 months, what alarm bells start going off for you? Speaker 0: Well, number 1, in seeing what we've seen in the state of Tennessee, our questions in the past couple of days have been, is this unique to us, or is this what is also being seen at other centers? Speaker 1: As the medical community gathers information and waits on specific causes of death for the 4 teenage runners, what they do know, each young athlete was running when their heart suddenly stopped. Speaker 0: So it can look like different things when it happens, and then on the other side of it, it can be very hard to distinguish what the cause was. Speaker 1: What is certain is the concern this is raising. People asking what is happening and how to protect their young athletes with everything on the table. Speaker 2: There have been questions raised about the COVID vaccine and the impact on the heart and if that is manifesting in young athletes. Is that a question that needs to be asked? Speaker 0: I think we should ask every question that we can think of at this moment, and we're not gonna discount anything. Speaker 1: As we wait for answers, doctor Flack urges parents to keep their kids on the track and the sports field, but to always start with a preseason sports physical. Speaker 0: I think it's important to repeat that every year because every year then you're re asking the question, do we have new family history? Does this athlete have a new symptom this year that's triggered that wasn't present before?

@_aussie17 - aussie17

SOURCE

@resilient333 - cheri maday

And four teen Runners...'suddenly'😪💔 *October 2024 "The deaths of four teenage Cross Country athletes in the last six months in Tennessee are raising red flags..." https://www.newschannel5.com/news/teen-runner-deaths-prompting-doctors-to-investigate

Teen runner deaths prompting doctors to investigate The deaths of four teenage Cross-Country athletes in the last six months in Tennessee – are raising red flags in the medical community, particularly among cardiologists. newschannel5.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

WRITE UP AND EMAILABLE FORMAT https://www.aussie17.com/p/sudden-deaths-of-four-teen-athletes

Sudden Deaths of Four Teen Athletes in Tennessee Ignite Firestorm Over COVID Vaccine Safety! "..questions raised about the COVID vaccine and the impact on the heart and if that is manifesting in young athletes.." aussie17.com
_aussie17
Posted - October 29, 2024 at 11:54 AM
Saved - October 29, 2024 at 12:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been alarmed by a significant increase in aggressive colorectal cancers since the rollout of gene-based injectables. Despite claims that this trend is not new, I've observed a dramatic rise in cases since 2021, including unusual recurrences and synchronous cancers in middle-aged and elderly patients. My colleagues in the multidisciplinary team have also noted this sudden change, yet we struggle to find an explanation. This surge cannot be attributed to environmental factors or delayed diagnoses, as we maintained our cancer pathways during lockdown.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Prominent UK Cancer Surgeon Issues Alarm Over Significant Increase in Cancers ...Finally, I need to talk about cancer, particularly colorectal cancers. In addition to the increase in all cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene based injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers... ...Despite recent articles claiming that the sudden growth in cancers is not new, such as the gaslighting article in the Daily Mail reporting on a baffling increase in trend in data from 1990 to 2019, there is a clear dramatic increase that occurred in 2021 shortly after the rollout. ... I've noticed aggressive widespread recurrences in previously successfully treated bowel cancer cases that I'd considered cured. Many metastases in these cases are unusual or atypical. Middle aged and elderly people are presenting with out of the blue aggressive stage 4 colorectal cancer who are incurable and die within weeks or months. In many of these cases, the entire liver appears to be filled with large round tumour masses. It is horrific to see on a weekly basis in my MDT (multi disciplinary team)... ..In my experience, it is rare for colorectal cancer to be as aggressive in elderly. Usually sporadic cancers that are diagnosed are still operable when they present. Elderly patients rarely present with stage four disease and certainly not in the way I've started seeing. Recently, we've seen three patients presenting with synchronous cancers, that is two separate bowel cancers in different areas of the colon presenting at the same time. This was previously considered rare, less than 3%. One was middle aged, otherwise fit and well, with two bulky locally invasive cancers, and one was very elderly with two primary cancers and liver metastases... ...Many of my multidisciplinary team, colleagues, fellow surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and specialist nurses have all acknowledged to me the sudden change in patterns and dramatic increase in these aggressive, incurable advanced cancers that we've observed in these past two years. However, none of them can offer an explanation.... ...This post 2021 increase cannot be explained by a sudden population wide change in environmental toxins. Ultra processed foods are not new. We already had an obesity epidemic prior to COVID 19.... ...The post 2021 surge in aggressive cancers in all ages cannot be blamed on lockdown and delayed diagnosis. As I showed earlier, during the COVID 19 pandemic, we did not stop our two week wait for colorectal pathways. We diagnosed and treated more rather than fewer cancers during lockdown as the only pathway that GPs could access. Therefore, this argument of stage migration or missed or delayed diagnosis does not hold true for colorectal cancer.... H/T:@SaiKate108

Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a concerning rise in aggressive colorectal cancers, termed "turbo cancers," particularly since the rollout of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. This increase is not attributed to lifestyle factors, delayed diagnoses, or environmental toxins, as these issues existed prior to 2021. The correlation between the vaccine rollout and the surge in aggressive cancers fulfills several epidemiological criteria for causation. Potential mechanisms include immune system suppression and the presence of contaminants in the vaccines. Many healthcare professionals have observed similar patterns of aggressive cancers and are increasingly willing to discuss these concerns despite fears of repercussions. The data suggest that COVID-19 vaccines may not be safe or effective, and there are calls for an immediate halt to their promotion and use.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Finally, I need to talk about cancer, particularly colorectal cancers. In addition to the increase in all cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene based injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers. These cancers have been termed colloquially, turbo cancers. Obviously, this is not a scientific term, but reflects the different aggressive biological nature that seems to be being observed by the public as well as clinicians. Despite recent articles claiming that the sudden growth in cancers is not new, such as the Gaslighting article in the Daily Mail reporting on a baffling increase in trend in data from 1990 to 2019. There was a clear dramatic increase that occurred in 2021 shortly after the rollout. A robust study recently published from Japan now redacted by the journal after significant pressure showed cancer related excess mortality in vaccinated populations. Cancer is being observed within all ages. It is my assertion shared by many experts oncologists and clinical colleagues around the world that the cancers we are seeing are extremely aggressive and are of a different biology. One study showed this dramatic increase, particularly in younger ages through 2021, 5.6% increase 2022, 7.9% increase. I've noticed aggressive widespread recurrences in previously successfully treated bowel cancer cases that I consider cured. Many metastases in these cases are unusual or atypical. Middle aged and elderly people are presenting with out of the blue aggressive Stage IV colorectal cancer who are incurable and die within weeks or months. In many of these cases, the entire liver appears to be filled with large round tumor masses. It is horrific to see on a weekly basis in IMBT. In my experience, it is rare for colorectal cancer to be as aggressive in elderly. Usually, sporadic cancers that are diagnosed are still operable when they present. Elderly patients rarely present with stage 4 disease and certainly not in the way I've started seeing. Recently, we've seen 3 patients presenting with synchronous cancers, that is 2 separate bowel cancers in different areas of the colon presenting at the same time. This was previously considered rare, less than 3%. 1 of 1 was middle aged, otherwise fit well with 2 bulky locally invasive cancers, and one was very elderly with 2 primary cancers and liver metastases. Many of my multidisciplinary team colleagues, fellow surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and specialist nurses, have all acknowledged to me the sudden change in patterns and dramatic increase in these aggressive incurable advanced cancers that we've observed in these past 2 years. However, none of them can offer an explanation. Various theories have been suggested. So what then is causing the sudden increased incidence in the other 92% that we're seeing? Number 2, Western ultra processed diet obesity and sedentary lifestyles. Whilst these things have undoubtedly played a major role in the steady increase in cancer over the past 3 to 4 decades, they do not explain the post 2021 sudden increase and change in biology, aggressive nature. This post 2021 increase cannot be explained by a sudden population wide change in environmental toxins. Ultra processed foods are not new. We already had an obesity epidemic prior to COVID 19. Number 3, lockdowns causing delayed diagnosis and suspended cancer screening programs. The post 2021 surge in aggressive cancers in all ages cannot be blamed on lockdown and delayed diagnosis. As I showed earlier, during the 19 the COVID 19 pandemic, we did not stop our 2 week wait of colorectal pathways. We diagnosed and treated more rather than fewer cancers during lockdown as the only pathway that GPs can access. Therefore, this argument of staged migration or missed or or delayed diagnosis does not hold true for colorectal cancer. Furthermore, colorectal screening services were only stopped for a few months of the first and second wave. In any case, there is no valid argument that the increase is due to stopping screening, given we are seeing a particular increase in cancers in much younger people, 20 to 45 years of age. Screening services for colorectal cancer and breast and others typically start at 60 years. Number 4, there's a close temporal association of the increasing cancers and the rollout of population wide mRNA COVID 19 genetic injections. The evident correlation fulfills the majority of the 9 Bradford Hill epidemiological criteria for causation. There are multiple plausible mechanisms that have been proposed by which cancer could be induced or potentiated, accelerated by the mRNA gene injections, including unacceptably high levels of bacterial plasmid contamination, the discovery of the SV 40 tumor promoter, disruption of the p 53 tumor suppressor, etcetera. These mechanisms are discussed widely by scientists and clinicians, such as doctor Kevin McKernan, professor Angus Doug Leach, doctor William Macas, and doctor Ryan Cole, a US pathologist, and many others and have been discussed on numerous international calls. More generally, the shots are clearly causing generalized immunosuppression. The immune system is grossly underestimated its complexity and importance in tumor surveillance in destroying mutated cells before they become cancers. Recently, other doctors have told me how they are seeing sudden recurrences of cancers that have been cured 10 or even 15 years earlier. I submitted over 20 yellow cards from June 2021. I could have submitted many more, but it was becoming very apparent that the MHRA was ignoring the data. I've never been given any feedback on any analysis of my cases or even acknowledgment except for 2 or 3 cases where further clarifying information that I'd already provided was requested. I was given no information back from the MHRA to indicate that they were looking at yellow card data or analyzing it. Despite this, the safety signal from both the MHRA and the VAERS system in the United States is unprecedented and undeniably obvious. Presenting this information formally, I've received mixed responses. More recently, in my more departmental morbidity and mortality meetings, there's been a more open acknowledgment that perhaps some observed events, such as ischemic bowel cases, may have been related to vaccines. I've had a number of conversations with 2 colorectal colleagues in other areas of the country who've had similar shared experiences, and they're in agreement with the observed patterns of thrombotic, infective and inflammatory and malignant disease. I've had the opportunity to give a presentation to an international surgical meeting in London in March 2023. At the end, I was congratulated on my perceived courage in standing up and speaking about these concerns. There was general agreement in the room, 30 or more surgeons. Many offered acknowledgment and similar observations, but had been unwilling to raise their concerns for fear of repercussions. In fact, a rather alarmed, eminent, retired surgeon present stated it was our duty to raise these concerns. In conclusion, the data are clear that COVID 19 vaccines are neither effective or safe. My own personal observations have been increasingly backed up by other data around the world and research studies as well as expert opinion in other centers. I personally demand that these injections and any promotion of them be stopped with immediate effect. Thank you for your attention.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

WRITE UP https://www.aussie17.com/p/news-alert-prominent-uk-cancer-surgeon

NEWS ALERT: Prominent UK Cancer Surgeon Raises Urgent Concerns Over Cancer Surge Following mRNA Vaccinations "since the gene based injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers" aussie17.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

ORIGINAL SOURCE TWEET Please follow @SaiKate108 https://t.co/FXrWWMHWh4

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

Prominent UK surgeon, Dr James Royle warns of turbo cancers which are rapidly forming, spreading and mutating. Confirming the findings of Prof. Angus Dalgleish et al. ‘Many of my multidisciplinary team colleagues, fellow surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and specialist nurses all acknowledged to me sudden change in patterns and dramatic increase in these incurable advanced cancers that we’ve observed in these past two years.’ The close temporal association between the increase cancers and the rollout fulfils the gold standard Bradford-Hill epidemiological criteria for causation. The tide is quietly turning with his colleagues and over 30 surgeons seeing the same.

Video Transcript AI Summary
An alarming rise in aggressive colorectal cancers, termed "turbocancers," has been observed since the rollout of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Reports indicate a significant increase in cancer cases, particularly among younger populations, with unusual presentations and rapid progression. Theories attributing this surge to lifestyle factors, delayed diagnoses, or environmental changes do not adequately explain the post-2021 trends. A close temporal association with the vaccine rollout raises concerns, as various mechanisms suggest potential links between the vaccines and cancer development. Despite reporting these observations, feedback from health authorities has been minimal. Many healthcare professionals acknowledge the troubling patterns but fear repercussions for voicing their concerns. The data indicate that COVID-19 vaccines may not be safe or effective, prompting a call for their immediate cessation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Finally, I need to talk about cancer, particularly colorectal cancers. In addition to the increase in all cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene based injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers. These cancers have been termed colloquially turbocancers. Obviously, this is not a scientific term, but reflects the different aggressive biological nature that seems to be being observed by the public as well as clinicians. Despite recent articles claiming that the sudden growth in cancers is not new, such as the Gaslighting article in the Daily Mail reporting on a baffling increase in trend in data from 1990 to 2019, There was a clear dramatic increase that occurred in 2021 shortly after the rollout. A robust study recently published from Japan, now redacted by the Journal after significant pressure, showed cancer related excess mortality in vaccinated populations. Cancer is being observed within all ages. It is my assertion shared by many expert oncologists and clinical colleagues around the world that the cancers we are seeing are extremely aggressive and are of a different biology. One study showed this dramatic increase, particularly in younger ages through 2021, 5.6% increase 2022, a 7.9% increase. I've noticed aggressive widespread recurrences in previously successfully treated bowel cancer cases that I consider cured. Many metastases in these cases are unusual or atypical. Middle aged and elderly people are presenting with out of the blue aggressive stage 4 colorectal cancer who are incurable and die within weeks or months. In many of these cases, the entire liver appears to be filled with large round tumor masses. It is horrific to see on a weekly basis in IMBT. In my experience, it is rare for colorectal cancer to be as aggressive in elderly. Usually, sporadic cancers that are diagnosed are still operable when they present. Elderly patients rarely present with stage 4 disease, and certainly not in the way I've started seeing. Recently, we've seen 3 patients presenting with synchronous cancers, that is 2 separate bowel cancers in different areas of the colon presenting at the same time. This was previously considered rare, less than 3%. 1 of 1 was middle aged, otherwise fitting well with 2 bulky, locally invasive cancers, and one was very elderly with 2 primary cancers and liver metastases. Many of my multidisciplinary team colleagues, fellow surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and specialist nurses, have all acknowledged to me the sudden change in patterns and dramatic increase in these aggressive incurable advanced cancers that we've observed in these past 2 years. However, none of them can offer an explanation. Various theories have been suggested. So what then is causing the sudden increased incidence in the other 92% that we're seeing? Number 2, Western ultra processed diet obesity in sedentary lifestyles. Whilst these things have undoubtedly played a major role in the steady increase in cancer over the past 3 to 4 decades, they do not explain the post 2021 sudden increase and change in biology, aggressive nature. This post 2021 increase cannot be explained by a sudden population wide change in environmental toxins. Ultra processed foods are not new. We already had an obesity epidemic prior to COVID 19. Number 3, lockdowns causing delayed diagnosis and suspended cancer screening programs. The post-twenty 21 surge in aggressive cancers in all ages cannot be blamed on lockdown and delayed diagnosis. As I showed earlier, during the COVID-nineteen pandemic, we did not stop our 2 week wait for colorectal pathways. We diagnosed and treated more rather than fewer cancers during lockdown as the only pathway that GPs can access. Therefore, this argument of staged migration or missed or died or delayed diagnosis does not hold true for colorectal cancer. Furthermore, colorectal screening services were only stopped for a few months of the first and second wave. In any case, there is no valid argument that the increase is due to stopping screening, given we are seeing a particular increase in cancers in much younger people, 20 to 45 years of age. Screening services for colorectal cancer and breast and others typically starts at 60 years. Number 4, there's a close temporal association of the increasing cancers and the rollout population wide mRNA COVID 19 genetic injections. The evident correlation fulfills the majority of the 9 Bradford Hill epidemiological criteria for causation. There are multiple plausible mechanisms that have been proposed by which cancer could be induced or potentiated, accelerated by the mRNA gene injections, including unacceptably high levels of bacterial plasmid contamination, the discovery of the SV 40 tumor promoter, disruption of the p 53 tumor suppressor, etcetera. These mechanisms are discussed widely by scientists and clinicians, such as doctor Kevin McKernan, professor Angus Doug Leach, doctor William Mackas, and doctor Ryan Cole, a US pathologist, and many others, and have been discussed on numerous international calls. More generally, the shots are clearly causing generalized immunosuppression. The immune system is grossly underestimated its complexity and importance in tumor surveillance in destroying mutated cells before they become cancers. Recently, other doctors have told me how they are seeing sudden recurrences of cancers that have been cured 10 or even 15 years earlier. I submitted over 20 yellow cards from June 2021. I could have submitted many more, but it was becoming very apparent that the MHRA was ignoring the data. I've never been given any feedback on any analysis of my cases or even acknowledgment, except for 2 or 3 cases where further clarifying information that I'd already provided was requested. I was given no information back from the MHRA to indicate that they were looking at yellow card data or analyzing it. Despite this, the safety signal from both the MHRA and the VAERS system in the United States is unprecedented and undeniably obvious. Presenting this information formally, I've received mixed responses. More recently, in my more departmental morbidity and mortality meetings, there's been a more open acknowledgment that perhaps some observed events, such as ischemic bowel cases, may have been related to vaccines. I've had a number of conversations with 2 colorectal colleagues in other areas of the country who've had similar shared experiences and are in agreement with the observed patterns of thrombotic, infective and inflammatory, and malignant disease. I've had the opportunity to give a presentation to an international surgical meeting in London in March 2023. At the end, I was congratulated on my perceived courage in standing up and speaking about these concerns. There was general agreement in the room, 30 or more surgeons. Many offered acknowledgment and similar observations, but had been unwilling to raise their concerns for fear of repercussions. In fact, a rather alarmed eminent retired surgeon present stated it was our duty to raise these concerns. In conclusion, the data are clear that COVID 19 vaccines are neither effective or safe. My own personal observations have been increasingly backed up by other data around the world and research studies, as well as expert opinion in other centers. I personally demand that these injections and any promotion of them be stopped with immediate effect. Thank you for your attention.
_aussie17
Posted - August 30, 2024 at 6:31 AM
Saved - August 31, 2024 at 10:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Yikes! On August 30th, Japanese Health Minister Keizō Takemi shifted from stating the mRNA vaccine is "safe and effective" to saying, "we would like to refrain from commenting" on health damage from the COVID-19 vaccine and its classification as drug-induced injury.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Yikes! 🚨 Aug 30th - Japanese Health Minister Keizō Takemi went from the mRNA vaccine is "safe and effective" to "we would like to refrain from commenting..." "Regarding whether health damage from the COVID-19 vaccine constitutes drug-induced injury, our response at this point is that we would like to refrain from commenting."

@biasfree1 - 後藤　専（たかし）どや顔社長

@_aussie17 In Japan,today we have good progress that the minister of health and labor says” I can’t deny Covid vaccine is harm of medicine. Sooner,he will admit these are harm.

_aussie17
Posted - August 30, 2024 at 5:56 AM
Saved - August 30, 2024 at 9:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was taken aback when NHK aired a detailed report on August 28 about the harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, prompting over 2,000 viewer messages expressing concern about the extent of these harms. The report highlighted the struggles faced by many individuals suffering from health issues related to the vaccine. Following this, Japanese Health Minister Keizō Takemi shifted from stating the vaccine was "safe and effective" to a more cautious stance, indicating a reluctance to comment on whether the health damage constitutes drug-induced injury.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Japanese citizens were left stunned when NHK, Japan's largest national broadcaster, on 28th Aug aired an hour long comprehensive report on the harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. The program received messages from over 2,000 viewers, revealing that the extent of the harms was greater than previously believed.

Video Transcript AI Summary
視聴者から2000件を超えるメッセージが寄せられた。3回目のワクチン接種後から頭痛が2年以上続いている人がいる。国の申請簡略化を強く求めている。ワクチン接種直後に母親が難病を発症し亡くなったという人もいる。救済制度を申請中だが、ワクチンとの関連を疑うと伝えただけで心ない言葉を浴びせられたという。2回目のワクチン接種後、両下肢に痛みとしびれを覚え歩行困難になった人もいる。入院中に制度を知り、2年かかって手帳が交付された。40代の元医療従事者は、3回目の接種後から腕の痛みやしびれ、倦怠感に3年近く悩まされている。同業職や病院から心ない言葉を投げかけられたこともあり、苦しんでいる人が多い。国もメディアも行動し、副反応の苦しみを理解してほしいという声が寄せられている。 More than 2000 messages were received from viewers. One person has had headaches for over two years since their third vaccination. They strongly request simplification of the national application process. Another person's mother developed a serious illness and died immediately after vaccination. They are applying for the relief system, but they were subjected to unkind words just for saying they suspected a connection with the vaccine. Another person experienced pain and numbness in both legs after the second vaccination, leading to difficulty walking. They learned about the system while hospitalized and received a disability certificate after two years. A former healthcare worker in their 40s has been suffering from arm pain, numbness, and fatigue for nearly three years since the third vaccination. They have been subjected to unkind words from colleagues and hospitals, and many people are suffering. There are calls for the government and media to take action and understand the suffering of side effects.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 視聴 者 の 皆 さ ん から も 2000 件 を 超 える 今 日 メッセージ いただき ま し た 。 たくさ ん ありがとうございます 。私は 三 回 目 の ワクチン を 打っ て から 頭 痛 が ひどく なり 、当初 より 軽 く は な っ た も の の 二 年 以上 症 状 が 続い て い ます 。 もう 二 年 半 も ワクチン 後 遺 症 です あ まり に も たくさ ん の 病 院 を 回り すぎ て 書 類 が 用 意 で き ず と に か く 自己 治 療 を 続け て い ます 国 の 申 請 の 簡略 化 を 強 く 求め ます 足 が 痛 い の で 書 類 も 取り に 行き に く い の で で、 簡略 化 を 早 急 に し て ほ し い です。 ワクチン 接種 直 後 に 母 が 難 病 を 発症 し 亡 く なり ま し た 。 救 済 制 度 に も 申 請 し 、審査 を 待っ て いる 状 況 です。 闘病 中 から 亡 く な っ て 申 請 書類 を 集 め て いる 期 間 、ワクチン と の 関連 を 疑っ て いる と 伝え る だけ で 、何 度 も 心 な い 言葉 を 浴 び て き ま し た 。社会 全 体 が ワクチン を 疑 う 雰 囲 気 を 許 さ ず 、被害 者 を 追い 詰め て き た こと も 行 動 し て ほ し い です と い っ た メッセージ を いただき ま し た 。 私 は 二 回 目 の コロ ナ ウイルス ワクチン 接種 後 、両 下 死 に 痛 み と し び れ を 覚え 、 そうこう し て いる うち に 歩 行 困 難 と な っ て し ま い ま し た 。 入 院 中 に こ の 制 度 の こと を 知り 、二 年 かかっ て 今 年 の 二 月 に 手 帳 が 交付 さ れ ま し た 。もっと 早く こ の 特 集 が 見 たかっ た です ね 。でも 、こう やっ て 取り 上げ て い た だけ て 、周囲 の 人 に 少 し で も 健 康 被 害 を 理 解 いただけれ ば 幸 い です。 四 十 代 三 津 さ ん です。 元 医 療 従事 者 です。 ワクチン 3 回 目 の 接種 後 から 、 接種 し た 腕 の 痛 み や し び れ 、 倦怠 感 な ど に 悩 ま さ れ て い ます 。 3 年 近 く 苦 し ん で い ます 。 同業 職 、 通 院 し た 病 院 から 心 な い 言葉 を 投げ かけ ら れ た こと も あります 。 実際 に 苦 し ん で いる 人 も 多 い と 思い ます 。 国 も メディア も しっかり 行 動 し て ほ し い です と 、この 副 反 応 の 苦 し み 事 態 を 知っ て も っ と 知っ て ほ し い と いう 声 が まず 届い て お り ます 。

@_aussie17 - aussie17

WRITE UP https://www.aussie17.com/p/japans-largest-msm-broadcaster-nhk

Japan's Largest MSM Broadcaster, NHK, Releases Groundbreaking Feature on mRNA Vaccine Harms We have received more than 2000 messages from viewers... aussie17.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

SOURCE TWEET https://t.co/CP9t7A699J

@JINKOUZOUKA_jp - 藤江@日本人、謎の大量死※コロナでは説明できない

本日（8/28）NHｋあさイチ 1時間を超える新型コロナワクチンの健康被害の特集 番組最後、視聴者からのメッセージ 健康被害で苦しんでいる方がたくさんいらっしゃいます。 https://t.co/cZfLW8UspM

Video Transcript AI Summary
視聴者から2000件を超えるメッセージが寄せられた。ワクチン接種後、頭痛が2年以上続く、または難病を発症し亡くなったという事例が報告された。救済制度の申請者は、審査を待つ間、ワクチンとの関連を疑うと伝えただけで心無い言葉を浴びせられたという。別の報告者は、2回目のワクチン接種後、両下肢に痛みとしびれを感じ、歩行困難となった。入院中に救済制度を知り、手帳が交付された。健康被害について周囲の理解を求めている。 More than 2,000 messages were received from viewers. Cases were reported of headaches lasting more than two years after vaccination, or of serious illness developing and resulting in death. One applicant for the relief system said that while waiting for the examination, they were subjected to unkind words just for saying they suspected a connection with the vaccine. Another reporter experienced pain and numbness in both lower limbs after the second vaccination, making it difficult to walk. They learned about the relief system while hospitalized and a handbook was issued. They are seeking understanding from those around them regarding the health damage.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: そして 視聴 者 の 皆 さ ん から も 2000 件 を 超 える 今 日 メッセージ いただき ま し た 。 たくさ ん ありがとうございます 。私は 三 回 目 の ワクチン を 打っ て から 頭 痛 が ひどく なり 、当初 より 軽 く は な っ た も の の 二 年 以上 症 状 が 続い て い ます 。 もう 二 年 半 も ワクチン 後 遺 症 です あ まり に も たくさ ん の 病 院 を 回り すぎ て 書 類 が 用 意 で き ず と に か く 自己 治 療 を 続け て い ます 国 の 申 請 の 簡略 化 を 強 く 求め ます 足 が 痛 い の で 書 類 も 取り に 行き に く い の で と に か く 簡略 化 を 早 急 に し て ほ し い です ワクチン 接種 直 後 に 母 が 難 病 発症 し 亡 く なり ま し た 救 済 制 度 に も 申 請 し 審 査 を 待っ て いる 状 況 です 闘病 中 から 亡 く な っ て 申 請 書 類 を 集 め て いる 期 間 ワクチン と の 関連 を 疑っ て いる と 伝え る だけ で 何 度 も 心 無 い 言葉 を 浴 び て き ま し た 社 会 全 体 が ワクチン を 疑 う 雰 囲 気 を 許 さ ず 被 害 者 を 追い 詰め て き た こと も 行 動 し て ほ し い です と い っ た メッセージ を いただき ま し た 私 は 二 回 目 の コロ ナ ウイルス ワクチン 接種 後 、両 価 値 に 痛 み と し び れ を 覚え そうこう し て いる うち に 五 行 困 難 と な っ て し ま い ま し た 入 院 中 に こ の 制 度 の こと を 知り 二 人 かかっ て 今 年 の 二 月 に 手 帳 が 交付 さ れ ま し た も っ と 早く こ の 特 集 が 見 たかっ た です ね で も こう やっ て 取り 上げ て い た だけ て 周 囲 の 人 に 少 し で も 健 康 被 害 を 理 解 いただけれ ば 幸 い です

@_aussie17 - aussie17

https://t.co/VbPaA7CxlX

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Yikes! 🚨 Aug 30th - Japanese Health Minister Keizō Takemi went from the mRNA vaccine is "safe and effective" to "we would like to refrain from commenting..." "Regarding whether health damage from the COVID-19 vaccine constitutes drug-induced injury, our response at this point is that we would like to refrain from commenting."

_aussie17
Posted - August 30, 2024 at 5:56 AM
Saved - August 30, 2024 at 8:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was shocked to see NHK air an hour-long report on August 28 about the harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. The response was overwhelming, with over 2,000 viewers sharing their thoughts, indicating that the reported harms were more extensive than we had previously understood.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Japanese citizens were left stunned when NHK, Japan's largest national broadcaster, on 28th Aug aired an hour long comprehensive report on the harms of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. The program received messages from over 2,000 viewers, revealing that the extent of the harms was greater than previously believed.

Video Transcript AI Summary
視聴者から2000件以上のメッセージをいただきました。ワクチン接種後、頭痛や体の痛みが続いている方が多く、特に申請手続きの簡略化を求める声が上がっています。ワクチン接種後に母を失った方は、救済制度の申請を待っており、社会がワクチンの影響を疑うことを許さない雰囲気に苦しんでいます。また、医療従事者からも、接種後の痛みや倦怠感に悩む声があり、国やメディアに対してこの問題にもっと取り組んでほしいとの要望があります。 --- We received over 2,000 messages from viewers. Many report ongoing headaches and body pain after vaccination, with calls for simplifying application processes. One individual, who lost their mother post-vaccination, is awaiting approval from the relief system and struggles with societal pressure against questioning vaccine effects. Additionally, healthcare professionals express concerns about pain and fatigue after vaccination, urging the government and media to address these issues more effectively.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 視聴 者 の 皆 さ ん から も 2000 件 を 超 える 今 日 メッセージ いただき ま し た 。 たくさ ん ありがとうございます 。私は 三 回 目 の ワクチン を 打っ て から 頭 痛 が ひどく なり 、当初 より 軽 く は な っ た も の の 二 年 以上 症 状 が 続い て い ます 。 もう 二 年 半 も ワクチン 後 遺 症 です あ まり に も たくさ ん の 病 院 を 回り すぎ て 書 類 が 用 意 で き ず と に か く 自己 治 療 を 続け て い ます 国 の 申 請 の 簡略 化 を 強 く 求め ます 足 が 痛 い の で 書 類 も 取り に 行き に く い の で で、 簡略 化 を 早 急 に し て ほ し い です。 ワクチン 接種 直 後 に 母 が 難 病 を 発症 し 亡 く なり ま し た 。 救 済 制 度 に も 申 請 し 、審査 を 待っ て いる 状 況 です。 闘病 中 から 亡 く な っ て 申 請 書類 を 集 め て いる 期 間 、ワクチン と の 関連 を 疑っ て いる と 伝え る だけ で 、何 度 も 心 な い 言葉 を 浴 び て き ま し た 。社会 全 体 が ワクチン を 疑 う 雰 囲 気 を 許 さ ず 、被害 者 を 追い 詰め て き た こと も 行 動 し て ほ し い です と い っ た メッセージ を いただき ま し た 。 私 は 二 回 目 の コロ ナ ウイルス ワクチン 接種 後 、両 下 死 に 痛 み と し び れ を 覚え 、 そうこう し て いる うち に 歩 行 困 難 と な っ て し ま い ま し た 。 入 院 中 に こ の 制 度 の こと を 知り 、二 年 かかっ て 今 年 の 二 月 に 手 帳 が 交付 さ れ ま し た 。もっと 早く こ の 特 集 が 見 たかっ た です ね 。でも 、こう やっ て 取り 上げ て い た だけ て 、周囲 の 人 に 少 し で も 健 康 被 害 を 理 解 いただけれ ば 幸 い です。 四 十 代 三 津 さ ん です。 元 医 療 従事 者 です。 ワクチン 3 回 目 の 接種 後 から 、 接種 し た 腕 の 痛 み や し び れ 、 倦怠 感 な ど に 悩 ま さ れ て い ます 。 3 年 近 く 苦 し ん で い ます 。 同業 職 、 通 院 し た 病 院 から 心 な い 言葉 を 投げ かけ ら れ た こと も あります 。 実際 に 苦 し ん で いる 人 も 多 い と 思い ます 。 国 も メディア も しっかり 行 動 し て ほ し い です と 、この 副 反 応 の 苦 し み 事 態 を 知っ て も っ と 知っ て ほ し い と いう 声 が まず 届い て お り ます 。
_aussie17
Posted - August 10, 2024 at 6:35 AM
Saved - August 10, 2024 at 3:53 PM

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Susan Wojcicki, the former CEO of YouTube, has passed away at the age of 56 after a two-year battle with cancer. Here's Wojcicki explaining how she tackled vaccine misinformation in Youtube during 2021. https://t.co/sERwRfYQFs

Video Transcript AI Summary
YouTube has removed over a million COVID-related videos that violate policies. They aim to promote information from trusted sources. They collaborated with the Biden administration to combat vaccine hesitancy. By featuring diverse voices, including experts and regular creators, they hope to address concerns and encourage vaccination.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When it comes to vaccines, vaccine hesitancy, videos that cause a public health risk, where do you wanna see YouTube do better? Speaker 1: Well, first of all, we've taken the we've taken responsibility very seriously. I've it's been one of my top priorities. And with regard to COVID and with regard to vaccines, that has been a top priority for us. And we have, we have a number of different ways that we address that. So first of all, we wanna make sure that if there's information that violates our policies, we came up with 10 different policies around COVID. Then if that's a violation of policies, then that's something that we'll remove. We removed over a 1000000 videos associated with COVID, but we also wanna make sure that we're raising up information that we think would be that come from trusted and authoritative sources, and, we've really been able to do that. Speaker 0: Have you talked to the Biden administration at all about vaccine hesitancy or or vaccine misinformation? Speaker 1: Well, we did a event actually with the Biden administration, including president Biden Biden himself, with a number of, creators, Fauci as well. And we really saw that as an opportunity to be able to help and spread that in the information that was coming from the administration and coming from experts to, using creators in those channels to be able to distribute, authoritative trusted Speaker 0: I wonder if there's anything that you see in, you know, the way that anti vaxxers behave on the platform. If there are any data or or insights there that could be helpful to people understanding where they're coming from. Speaker 1: I mean, we try to we try to understand what are the different ways that we can break through. So we talked about in this campaign that we did about getting back to the things that you love. We talked about we rep we had people that represented all different backgrounds. We had people like, one of them was actually featuring, her mom, talking about, like, how she was thinking about. So we what we really tried to do was get not just from the experts, but also people that, were not experts, but who were explaining, like, why did they take the vaccine? Why was that relevant for them? And what was their thought process? So and that's a place where I believe YouTube can really shine is having experts as well as, just regular creators and people give their opinions.
_aussie17
Posted - July 30, 2024 at 9:56 PM
Saved - August 1, 2024 at 2:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Germany's MSM Welt has declared that the unvaccinated are the true winners of the corona pandemic, calling for apologies from government officials for misleading claims about a "pandemic of the unvaccinated." It's exciting to see the unvaccinated rehabilitated, especially after the release of unredacted protocols from the Robert Koch Institute, which revealed that as early as November 2021, officials knew the statement was incorrect. Prominent figures, including the Health Minister and the Federal President, propagated this narrative, and I believe they owe the public an apology.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Germany's MSM Welt just declared that the unvaccinated are the winners during the corona pandemic and demands apologies from government officials for lying about the "pandemic of the unvaccinated." ...that's a very exciting story because the winners for me are the unvaccinated during the Corona times. They have now been rehabilitated. And there's nothing left to argue about that. It turned out when the unredacted protocols of the crisis team at the Robert Koch Institute were opened that already in November 2021 it was officially determined by them that the statement, the pandemic is a pandemic of the unvaccinated, is not correct. Literally not correct. Mr. Spahn, the Health Minister. Mr. Söder, Mr. Lauterbach, Mr. Ramelow from the Left Party. And, hear this, the Federal President, Mr. Steinmeier, also propagated this, in the highest instance, so to speak. This is simply an impossible story. And I think they should now publicly apologize for it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In der Sendung diskutiert Hans Ulrich Jörgert die Gewinner und Verlierer der Coronazeit. Er betont, dass die Ungeimpften rehabilitiert wurden, da die Pandemie alle Bevölkerungsgruppen betrifft. Er fordert öffentliche Entschuldigungen von Politikern, die den Mythos der "Pandemie der Ungeimpften" verbreitet haben. Jörgert erinnert an die Einschränkungen für Ungeimpfte und fordert Verantwortung von den Verursachern. Translation: In the show, Hans Ulrich Jörgert discusses the winners and losers of the Covid era. He emphasizes that the unvaccinated have been vindicated, as the pandemic affects all population groups. He calls for public apologies from politicians who spread the myth of the "pandemic of the unvaccinated." Jörgert recalls the restrictions on the unvaccinated and demands accountability from those responsible.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hallo und herzlich willkommen zu unserer neuen Rubrik meine Welt, meine Meinung bei uns im Studio ist heute Hans Ulrich Jörgert. Schönen guten Abend. Speaker 1: Oh, mich sehr, guten Abend. Speaker 0: Ja, wir schauen natürlich gleich auf die Gewinner des Tages der Woche und da müssen wir einen Blick zurückwerfen in die Coronazeit. Ist ja schon Speaker 1: eine Weile her. Das ist eine ganz spannende Geschichte, denn das sind die Gewinner sind für mich die Ungeimpften der Coronazeit. Die sind ja jetzt rehabilitiert worden. Und zwar, da gibt's nix mehr dran zu deuten. Das hat sich nämlich rausgestellt bei der Öffnung der ungeschwärzten Protokolle des Krisenstabs beim Robert Koch Institut, das schon im November zweitausendeinundzwanzig von denen höchstinstanzlich festgestellt worden ist, dass der Spruch, die Pandemie sei eine Pandemie der Ungeimpften, nicht korrekt ist. Wörtlich nicht korrekt. An der Pandemie sei die gesamte Bevölkerung beteiligt, auch die Geimpften. Jetzt muss man sich mal vor Augen halten, was das für die Ungeimpften bedeutet hat damals. Die da gab's ja diese zwei G Regelung, dass nur Geimpfte und Genesene sich frei bewegen konnten. Und die Ungeimpften durften nicht ins Kino, nicht ins Theater, nicht ins Konzert, nicht ins Restaurant, die durften gar nix außer arbeiten, obwohl sie jeden Tag sich testen lassen mussten. Das war ein ziemlicher Hammer. Und einen solchen Eingriff in Freiheitsrechte von Menschen hab ich in dem Land für völlig unmöglich gehalten, aber es ging eben durch, weil alle glaubten, das sei so. Und die sind ja außerdem in einer Art und Weise beleidigt, beschimpft und runtergemacht worden, dass man sich da im Nachhinein nur schämen kann für. Und nun komm ich gleich zur zweiten Kategorie, die Verlierer des Tages. Das sind all diejenigen, die diesen Satz von der Pandemie der Ungeimpften vor sich hergetragen hat hatten. Herr Spahn, der Gesundheitsminister, Herr Söder, Herr Lauterbach, Herr Ramelow von den Linken. Und hört, hört, der Bundespräsident, Herr Steinmeier hat das auch verbreitet, höchst instanzlich sozusagen. Das ist einfach eine unmögliche Geschichte. Und ich finde, die müssten Sie jetzt dafür öffentlich entschuldigen. Ich möchte mal sehen, dass einer auf den Mumm hat und zu sagen, ich hab mich geirrt damals. Es tut mir leid. Ich sehe jetzt, was vielen Menschen dadurch passiert ist, ich entschuldige mich. Spahn hat ja relativ früh gesagt, wir wir erinnern uns alle an den Satz, wir müssen Speaker 0: Und so muss man sagen. Speaker 1: Wir müssen uns viel verzeihen am Ende der Pandemie. Dann soll er doch mal anfangen. Soll er doch mal Verzeihung bitten. Damit wirklich, damit rechne ich jetzt.
_aussie17
Posted - July 4, 2024 at 3:53 AM
Saved - July 4, 2024 at 2:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
7News is accused of covering up dissenting voices. There is a discrepancy between what they show and what actually happened. Further commentary and sources are available for more information on the matter.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

7News covers up dissenting voices... Here's what they want you to see versus what really happened.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 is pleased about vaccination effectiveness in preventing severe COVID and long-term effects. They mention rare side effects from vaccines and emphasize the importance of ongoing monitoring. Speaker 1 questions the safety of products on the market without complete testing. The TGA lacks data on adverse events due to underreporting, leading to audience frustration.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's great. I'm really pleased for you. But the people who've had COVID, who haven't been vaccinated, get more severe disease, and they're more likely to get long COVID. Once the vaccines get right That's great with basically. I understand. People who've had COVID, excuse me, that is finished. People who have COVID who haven't Snake oil salesmen. And if we're gonna see really, really, really, really rare side effects, we've had 14, 7 to 10, 000, 000, 000 doses to see those, and we haven't heard of, anything unusual at this point, but we will keep looking. Speaker 1: In a controlled manner. That's not a test. That's just giving it to everybody. Speaker 0: I disagree with that. Speaker 1: Thank you, William. Why in 2018 to allow products on the market that haven't finished all the testing required before registration. So they were because they're still building the safety profile of the drug because people didn't know about this. They didn't report their side effects. So the TGA does not know the exact number of people who died and were injured from these traps. That's why you've got an audience full of angry people. Thank you.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Emailable format and further commentary here https://www.aussie17.com/p/stunning-leaked-audio-7news-exposed

STUNNING LEAKED AUDIO: 7News Exposed Behind the Scenes Lies, Lies and More Lies! aussie17.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

SOURCE https://t.co/KlrSyGPLc2

@cafelockedout - Cafe Locked Out (KULTURE) 8:32

And this is even better, also cut https://t.co/MpwAg8d1RX

Video Transcript AI Summary
The mRNA COVID vaccines were provisionally registered in 2018, allowing them on the market without full testing. The symbol on the box indicated reporting side effects was necessary, but many did not. The exact number of deaths and injuries is unknown. Rare side effects are being monitored after 14.7 billion doses administered. The lack of controlled data collection is criticized.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you. Morning, Why the vaccine, the mRNA products for COVID. This was on the box in. It means that provisionally registered. They would have been illegal in 2016. They changed the law in 2018 to allow products on the market that haven't finished all the testing required for full registration. So they were only provisionally registered. This symbol meant your doctor or you were supposed to report any possible side effects to the TGA because they're still building the safety profile of the drug. Because people didn't know about this. They didn't report their side effects. So the TGA does not know the exact number of people who died and were injured from these traps. That's why you've got an audience full of angry people. Thank you. Speaker 1: And if we're going to see really, really, really, really rare side effects, we've had 14, 7 to 10, 000, 000, 000 doses to see those, and we haven't heard of, anything unusual at this point, but we will keep looking. Speaker 0: Not collecting the dollar. In a controlled manner. That's not a test. That's just giving it to everybody. Speaker 1: I disagree with that.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

SOURCE https://t.co/4kSVvVD9gm

@cafelockedout - Cafe Locked Out (KULTURE) 8:32

What really happened on Channel 7's spotlight show https://t.co/kGdNl0MbJ2

_aussie17
Posted - June 27, 2024 at 10:06 PM
Saved - June 28, 2024 at 12:39 AM

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Japanese cancer mortality due to vaccines paper retracted because of censorship! I'm shocked...not 🙄

@tom35345637 - tom とむ Jab Injuries Japan (JIJ) ワクチン傷害🇯🇵日本の声

A Japanese research paper published on Cureus in Apr 2024 Increased Age-adjusted Cancer Mortality after the 3rd mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan is retracted by the publisher! The authors report this was due to a complaint made by ⇒ https://t.co/Yd2FgAkopd

_aussie17
Posted - June 19, 2024 at 2:27 AM
Saved - June 19, 2024 at 10:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Japanese news anchor Oishi reports over 36,000 cases of suspected side effects and 2,168 deaths after vaccination in Japan. Many deaths show damage to the heart and brain. Despite this, vaccination continues without serious concern. English dubbed version of Oishi's commentary is now available on YouTube to spread awareness globally.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨Legendary Japanese news anchor Oishi from CBC @Nowonshare_cbc continues to share vaccine inflicted harms and asking why the Japanese Gov is not taking any actions. Highlights---- Reported cases of suspected side effects after vaccination. It has exceeded 36,000 cases. 36,000 cases! There are many types of reported side effects, and they are occurring throughout the body. ... Now, let's look at the reported cases of suspected deaths after vaccination. There have been 2,168 cases. .... Among the people who have died, many reports indicate damage to the heart and brain. .... Despite the high number of deaths in Japan, vaccination has continued as "there is no serious concern" .... What exactly does "serious concern" mean as defined by the government? How many deaths after vaccination would it take to become a "serious concern"? ------ His news reports is also now available in English Dub on their youtube channel (link below) H/T: @midfado_22

Video Transcript AI Summary
新型コロナワクチンの接種は2021年から始まり、日本では4億回以上の接種が行われています。接種率は80％で、副反応報告は3万6千件を超えています。一部の接種後に重篤な症状が現れており、死亡疑い報告も2168件あります。国は重大な懸念を示しており、接種後の死亡が増えるとさらなる検討が必要です。 Translation: The vaccination of the new coronavirus began in 2021, with over 400 million doses administered in Japan. The vaccination rate is 80%, with over 36,000 reported adverse reactions. Some individuals experienced severe symptoms after vaccination, and there have been 2,168 reports of suspected deaths. The country is expressing serious concerns, and further consideration is needed as the number of deaths post-vaccination increases.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 今回 も 出 所 の は っきり と し て いる データ と 私 の 取 材 を 交 え て 真 摯 に お 伝え する 大石 解説 です。 日本 で 新 型 コロ ナ ワクチン の 接種 は 二千 二 十 一 年 から 始 まり ま し た 。 で は 接種 回 数 を 見 て み ま しょう 。こちら です。 四 億 回 を 超 え て い ます 。 四 億 回 を 超 え て い ます 。 ちなみ に 日 本 の 人 口 は 一 億 二千 四 百 万 人 です。 一 回 目 、二 回 目 の ワクチン 接種 率 は お よ そ 八 十 パー セント 、これ は 世界 トップ レベル です。 最 も 多 く 接種 し た 方 七 回 接種 し て い ます 。 七 回 接種 し て い ます 。 で は な ぜ ここ ま で 接種 が 増 え た ん で しょう か 。まず は です ね ワクチン 接種 に 努 力 義 務 が つい た から と 思 わ れ ます 。この 努 力 義 務 と いう の は 強制 で は な い んですけど も ワクチン 接種 に 努 め なけれ ば な ら な い と いう 意 味 な ん です です。この 努 力 義 務 が つい た から 接種 が 促 進 さ れ た 、そんな こと も 考え ら れ ます 。そし て もう 一 つ は 国 の 方 針 に 従順 な 国 民 性 も 他 の 国 より も 接種 が 多 かっ た 理 由 かもしれません 。 で は 副 反 応 見 て み ま しょう 。 接種 後 の 副 反 応 疑 い 報 告 事 例 、三 万 六 千 件 を 超 え て い ます 。 三 万 六 千 件 を 超 え て い ます 。 報 告 さ れ て いる 副 反 応 の 種 類 は 多 く て そして 全 身 で 起 き て いる ん です ね 。実際 に 私 が 取 材 し ま し た お 二 人 を ご 紹介 し ま しょう 。 五十 代 の 男 性 です 。この 男 性 は 一 回 目 の ワクチン 接種 後 に 四十 度 を 超 える 高熱 が 三 週 間 続い て 、その 後 神 経 が ダメージ を 受け る 急性 産 罪 性 脳 脊髄 炎 と 診 断 さ れ 下 半 身 が 動 か なくなっ て し ま い ま し た 。 今 は 車 椅 子 が 必要 な 身 体 障 害 者 です 。もう 一 人 ご 紹介 し ま しょう 。 五十 代 の 女 性 に なり ます 。この 女 性 は 四 回 目 の ワクチン 接種 後 に 様 々 な 症 状 が 出 て き ま し た 脱 毛 、頭痛 発進 全 体 の 倦怠 感 全 身 倦怠 感 握力 は なく なり 歩行 困 難 に な っ て い ます 。 今 な お こ の 状 態 が 続い て いる ん です。 で は 、 接種 後 の 死 亡 疑 い 報 告 事 例 です。 二千 21 6 8 件 2 1 6 8 件 です これ ま で に 死 亡 し た 人 は 心臓 や 脳 な ど に ダメージ を 受け て いる 人 が 多 い と いう 報 告 が 上がっ て い ます 日本 で は 死 者 が 多 く て も です ね 、 重大 な 懸 念 は な い と し て ワクチン 接種 は 続い て き ま し た 。 国 が 示 す 重大 な 懸 念 と は 、 で は 一 体 どんな も の な ん で しょう か 。 接種 後 の 死 亡 が 何 人 ま で 増 え れ ば です ね 重大 な 懸 念 に なる ん で しょう か 。

@_aussie17 - aussie17

English Dubbed version on Youtube. "I have uploaded the English version of "Oishi Commentary" on YouTube. The purpose is to let the world know the current situation of vaccine side effects in Japan and to let them know the reality of the world. If you have any acquaintances abroad, please spread the word. I hope to spread the word to the world. Please lend me your support." https://t.co/4rKRhY6f1d

@Nowonshare_cbc - 大石邦彦のNOW ON SHARE!

YouTube「大石解説」の英語版をアップしました。ワクチン後遺症の日本の現状を世界に伝え、世界の現実を知るためです。フォロワーの皆さんの中で海外に知り合いがいれば、拡散をお願い致します。世界へ拡散を希望しています。皆様のお力をお貸し下さい。 https://youtu.be/7EBGAEup6ww?si=QQafWCLy2ZW3SQVy

@_aussie17 - aussie17

https://t.co/W06nmGivgB

@Nowonshare_cbc - 大石邦彦のNOW ON SHARE!

YouTube「大石解説」の英語版をアップしました。ワクチン後遺症の日本の現状を世界に伝え、世界の現実を知るためです。フォロワーの皆さんの中で海外に知り合いがいれば、拡散をお願い致します。世界へ拡散を希望しています。皆様のお力をお貸し下さい。 https://youtu.be/7EBGAEup6ww?si=QQafWCLy2ZW3SQVy

_aussie17
Posted - June 18, 2024 at 3:10 AM
Saved - June 18, 2024 at 1:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A recent study conducted in South Korea examined the relationship between dementia and the COVID vaccine. The study analyzed data from 550,000 individuals who received two doses of the vaccine. After three months, the study found that mild dementia had doubled among vaccinated individuals compared to non-vaccinated individuals. Additionally, the number of people who developed dementia or Alzheimer's disease increased by over 20%. (Source: @ganaha_masako)

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Japanese Neuroscientist Dr. Hiroto Komano Alarmed at Explosive Dementia Surge Amongst COVID Vaccinated Individuals: Massive Study of ~600,000 Reveals Highlights This paper was recently published. There has been talk about the relationship between dementia and the COVID vaccine, so they investigated this in South Korea. They examined a very large number of people. They examined a very large number of people - 550,000 people. 550,000 people. And they limited it to those who received two doses of the vaccine. And then, after one month, two months, three months, they analyzed all the data. Mild dementia. It's the precursor stage before dementia. It's the precursor stage before dementia. This had doubled. Among vaccinated individuals compared to non-vaccinated individuals. This is significant. And this is after three months. After three months. And the number of people who developed dementia or Alzheimer’s disease increased by over 20%. h/t: @ganaha_masako

Video Transcript AI Summary
コマ野先生は薬学博士で、認知症の研究に専念しています。最近の研究では、65歳以上の2回ワクチン接種者の認知症リスクが未接種者に比べて2倍増加し、3ヶ月後にはアルツハイマー病になるリスクも有意に上昇しています。認知症は深刻な問題であり、65歳以上の5人に1人が認知症になっています。この状況が悪化すると、高齢者の認知症リスクがさらに増加し、日本の認知症患者数が深刻な状況になる可能性があります。 Translation: Dr. Komanoya is a pharmaceutical doctor specializing in dementia research. Recent studies show that the risk of dementia doubles for those over 65 who receive two vaccine doses compared to those who do not. After three months, the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease significantly increases. Dementia is a serious issue, with one in five individuals over 65 affected. If the situation worsens, the risk of dementia among the elderly will further increase, potentially leading to a critical situation in Japan.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: それ で は 、ゲスト の 先 生 方 の プロ フィー ル を です ね 、ここ で まず ご 紹介 さ せ て いただき た い と 思い ます 。 まず は コマ 野 先 生 です。 コマ 野 先 生 は 薬 学 博 士 、一般 社 団 法 人 100 年 生 き 方 塾 の 代 表 理 事 を さ れ て お り ます 。 ブレイ ン フィット ネス コー チング 主 催 東京 大 学 部 ご 卒 業 後 、同 大 学 助 手 、そして 米 国 スタンフォード 大 学 ミシガン 大 学 医 学 部 研究 国立 長 寿 医 療 研究 センター の 室 長 、そして 、岩手 医 科 大 学 薬 学 部 教 授 北海道 大 学 大 学 院 、薬 学 研究 員 客 員 教 授 を 経 Speaker 1: て 経験 職 。 僕 の 専 門 が おかしく な っ た ん じゃ な い か と 思っ て る んですけど 、僕 は 認知 症 、神経 科 学 っ て いう の を 専 門 と し て 研究 し て い た の で 今 回 の レ プリ コン ワクチン です ね 、あり は い ま せ ん 。これ は 最 近 論 文 が 出 た ん ですよね 。 日 常 と の コロ ナ ワクチン と の 患 者 さ ん も よく 言わ れ て た んだけど 韓国 で 調べ た ん です よ 。これ すごい 人 数 を ね 、55 万 の 人 数 を 調べ た ん です よ 。それ も 二 回 打っ た ワクチン に 限ら せ た わけ 。そし て 一 ヶ 月 後 、二 ヶ 月 、三 ヶ 月 と 全 部 そ の データ から 解析 し て た ん です ね 。そし て 六 十 五 歳 以上 、二 回 ワクチン を 打っ た 人 だけ それ で 何 ヶ 月 後 に どう な っ て る か と いう の を そ の 国 民 健 康 保 険 に 載 っ て いる データ を 解析 し た ん です よ そしたら です ね 、もう 見 事 に です ね 、これ ね これ ちょっと 見 に く く て い い ん じゃ な い んだけど 、五十 八 万 で ね コントロール 非 セッション は 確 か 10 万 ぐらい だ っ た と 思い ます 。 m ci っ て いう の を ここ に 書い た んですけど 、これ 六 十 五 歳 以上 です ね。 MC I っ て いう の は マイル ド コ グ ニ ティブ ・イン ペ ア メント っ て 経 度 認 知 症 の こと を 言 う ん です ね。 経 度 認 知 症 Speaker 0: 。 Speaker 1: 認 知 症 は 映 る 前 段 階 な ん です よ 。これ が 2 倍 増 え て た ん です よ 。 ワクチン 接種 者 未 接種 者 に 比べ て 、これ で か い です よ 。そし て 三 ヶ 月 後 です よ 、三 ヶ 月 後 っ て 限ら せ て 、そして 認 知 症 、 アルツハイマー 病 に な っ た の は 二 十 何 パー セント 、 有意 に 上がっ て た ん です ね 。これ は です ね 今 ね あ の ワクチン じゃなくて コロ ナ で ぼけ ちゃっ て ぼけ る っ て 意 味 は 焦 点 が 外 れ ちゃっ た けど 、認知 症 っ て いう の は 今 六 十 五 歳 以上 だ と 五 人 に 一 人 は 認 知 症 に な っ て る ん です よ 。 薬 が な い ん です よ 。 だ から みんな すごく 介 護 そ の 他 で 非常 に 水 質 感 の 長 い 間 10 年 ぐらい で よう や く 亡 く な っちゃ っ て い く っ て いう 軽度 認 知 症 の MC I が もう そ の 二 倍 以上 増 え た 2。4 倍 に 増 え た っていうこと な ん です ね 。それ が どう し て 起 き る か っていうこと の 一 つ の 可能 性 と し て 今 これ 認 知 症 は どんどん 増 え て っ て こと 。 今 どんどん どんどん 増 え て て 、この ワクチン で 全 く 増 え ます よ 。ただ です ね こ の ワクチン 、コロナ ワクチン プリ コン ワクチン を 打 つ こと に よっ て です ね 、何 が 起 き る か と いう と です ね 、多く の 人 が IG GO な ど の 誘導 に よっ て 免 疫 が 弱 く な っ て 他 の 病 気 で 死ぬ そして 子 供 に 移 っ て 子 供 が 生 ま れ なく なる ある い は 子 供 に 何 か 毒性 が それ だけ じゃなくて 認 知 症 が 増 える っ て いう いい こと 何 も な い です よ Speaker 0: 。 Speaker 1: 認 知 症 増 え た ら ね これ 大 変 です よ 。 死な なく て 生 き 残っ た 高齢 者 は 認 知 症 に 今 度 なる 危 険 で 。 で 。 5 人 に 1 人 、65 歳 以上 5 人 に 1 人 は 認 知 症 に な っ て る ん です よ 、日本 の 状 況 は 。これ 5 人 に 2 人 に なる っ て

@_aussie17 - aussie17

write up and sources https://www.aussie17.com/p/japanese-neuroscientist-dr-hiroto

Japanese Neuroscientist Dr. Hiroto Komano Alarmed at Explosive Dementia Surge Amongst COVID Vaccinated Individuals: Massive Study of ~600,000 Reveals "It's unbelievable that they're also developing other vaccines with messenger RNA!" aussie17.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Source of Study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38806183/

A potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and development of alzheimer's disease - PubMed Preliminary evidence suggests a potential link between COVID-19 vaccination, particularly mRNA vaccines, and increased incidences of AD and MCI. This underscores the need for further research to elucidate the relationship between vaccine-induced immune responses and neurodegenerative processes, advo … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Video Source: https://rumble.com/v51q0r2-mrna.html

【生配信】具体的に”レプリコンワクチン”の何が脅威？『mRNAワクチン中止を求める国民連合』発足インタビュー⑤駒野宏人先生✖️荒川央先生 ｍRNAワクチン中止を求める国民連合 https://stop-mrna.com/ フォローや署名もお願いします🙏 ●公式HPhttps://stop-mrna.com ●署名する（VOICE）https://voice.charity/events/721 ●公式Xhttps://twitter.com/stop_mRNA_com ●Xコミュニティに参加するhttps://twitter.com rumble.com
_aussie17
Posted - June 7, 2024 at 4:07 AM
Saved - June 7, 2024 at 2:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
DNA contamination in Australian Pfizer and Moderna vials confirmed, exceeding per dose limits by over 350 times and 200 times respectively. Questions raised for @TGAgovau. H/T: @Double_Christ @DJSpeicher. Source: Post 2. @BroadbentMP @MRobertsQLD. Oof @AC_Crockett.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

DNA contamination confirmed in Australian Pfizer & Moderna Vials DNA contamination in Pfizer was over 350 times above per dose limits set by the TGA (34,900% above), and over 200 times above per dose limits for Moderna (19,900% above). H/T: @Double_Christ @DJSpeicher @TGAgovau has a lot to answer. @BroadbentMP @MRobertsQLD

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Source https://open.substack.com/pub/julesonthebeach/p/australian-dna-contamination-confirmed?r=1vqgrj&utm_medium=ios

Australian DNA CONTAMINATION Confirmed .. in Australian vials of Pfizer and Moderna .. NOT safe for Humans .. what did our politicians say this was .. safe & effective? julesonthebeach.substack.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Oof @AC_Crockett

_aussie17
Posted - May 30, 2024 at 1:54 AM
Saved - May 31, 2024 at 4:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Philippines' House of Representatives is investigating over 290,000 excess deaths potentially linked to experimental vaccines. Many Filipinos are frustrated with the Department of Health's lack of acknowledgment and support for those who have fallen ill or died. The chair believes there is a correlation between the vaccines and these adverse effects. Additionally, there is an agreement that pharmaceutical companies cannot be sued for any injuries or fatalities caused by the vaccines. The government is determined to learn from this mistake and make necessary amendments to ensure accountability in the future.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Explosive Hearing: Philippines' House of Representatives Investigates 290K+ Excess Deaths Correlated with Experimental Vaccines Highlights ....there are Filipino people who are sick and tired of how the DOH(Department of Health) has let us down, has refused to admit that people are dying, turning a blind eye to the people who are getting sick, turbo cancers, myocarditis, children who are suddenly sick as if they are 60, 70-year-old people. ...there does not seem to be any sympathy for the people who have died, for the people who are now physically disabled because of these vaccines. ...And that's the reason why the chair believes that there is really a correlation between these two.... ...those pharmaceutical companies provided us the vaccines before the vaccination rollout. There's really an agreement that indicates that they cannot be sued. ... Why would a pharmaceutical company insist on not being sued if there will be injuries or fatalities that may come after as a result of that? ...We've been a part of that mistake because we approved the law that mandate the pharmaceutical to be responsible. And now we learn from that mistake. And there's a reason why we are so serious about finding out those amendments. Because we've already learned. That's what we should do from that mistake. Moving forward, we will correct the mistakes. @SuperSally888

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers express concerns about the Department of Health's handling of deaths and adverse effects related to COVID-19 vaccines. They discuss a correlation between vaccine rollout and increased deaths, highlighting spikes in mortality following vaccination campaigns. The conversation also touches on pharmaceutical companies' immunity from lawsuits related to vaccine injuries, prompting a call for further investigation and potential policy changes. The speakers acknowledge past mistakes in legislation and emphasize the need for amendments to ensure accountability in the future. Translation: The speakers are worried about how the Department of Health is handling deaths and side effects from COVID-19 vaccines. They talk about a link between vaccine distribution and more deaths, especially after people get vaccinated. They also mention that pharmaceutical companies can't be sued for vaccine-related injuries, leading to calls for more research and changes in policies. They admit to past errors in laws and stress the importance of making improvements for accountability going forward.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And there are Filipino people who are sick and tired of how the DOH has let us down, has refused to admit that people are dying, turning a blind eye to the people who are getting sick. Horbocancers, myocarditis, children who are suddenly sick as if they are 60, 70 year old people. Your honors, we have seen the cavalier attitude of the DOH here over the past 5 hearings. They don't care. We look into their eyes. There does not seem to be any sympathy for the people who have died, for the people who are now physically disabled because of these vaccines. Speaker 1: This is our birth data, and it starts at the top from 2019 and it shows that we have had a loss of babies every single year since the pandemic has started. So 2019 was our last normal birth year. And the last line at the bottom is 2023 and we can see that our births are even lower this year. This is the death data. The very big spike are the deaths in 2021, which started in March of 2021 immediately consecutive with the start of the vaccine rollout. And the very big spike in deaths that we see in July August is actually consecutive with the rollout of the Janssen vaccines. There was a big spike in deaths exactly concurrent with that. So 2022 we had lower deaths, but the deaths were still higher than 2020 by around 8% 8% to 9%. 2023, our data is still incomplete, but the deaths in 2023 are already nearly 10% higher than 2022. So a 10% excess deaths would be considered a Black Swan event. You would not expect that. But we have had consecutive years of excess deaths since 2021. So there is no acknowledgment of any deaths officially related to COVID 19 vaccination. However, in 2020, the death rates amongst all age groups, nearly all age groups went down. In 2021, when vaccination rolled out, the deaths went up in all age groups that were vaccinated. There was a rise increase in deaths. The Department of Health has officially told us that people died because they could not access medical care and we would counter that people who do not need medical care to stay alive cannot die when they don't receive medical care. So most young people don't need medical care to stay alive, yet they still died in excess in 2021 and onwards. So we would counter there doesn't seem to be any other rational explanation and the deaths were temporarily linked following the start of vaccine rollout. We didn't have a famine. We didn't have any other diseases. We didn't have a major typhoon. What's the explanation? Speaker 2: Actually, we have, established already done with the previous hearings that, excess deaths, due to, to, vaccination. There are those that, because of the vaccines. As a matter of fact, adverse, adverse effect after immunization, 113,000. And your serious is 2,000 And that's the reason why I believe that you believes that there is really a correlation between, these Speaker 3: those those pharmaceutical companies provided us the vaccines before their before the vaccination roll out. Agreement indicate that they cannot be sued. So, I mean, that's something that we should worry about. Speaker 2: Yeah. I deducted 17. Speaker 3: And if there's a if there is really an excessive Speaker 0: theft, no, Speaker 3: and agreed upon between this between our 3, good resource per, persons, I think they established that in the previous years prior to the pandemic, here comes the pandemic roll out. So there has to be some sort of a correlation. Why would a pharmaceutical company insist on not being sued if there will be injuries or fatalities that may come after as a result of that? I think that's how I think the position of, position is I think you should dig deeper. Analyst. Speaker 2: And that's Speaker 3: it's a paradigm shift maybe for for our government and for the FDA. Speaker 2: Now I problem before I recognize congress Sorry, congressman, with your indulgence. No? We've been a part of that mistake because we approved that, the law that, that, mandate that that that that mandate the, the, pharmaceutical to be responsible. And now we learned from that mistake, and that's the reason why we are so, so serious about finding out those amendments. From that mistake, moving forward,

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Write up and emailable format https://www.aussie17.com/p/explosive-hearing-philippines-house

Explosive Hearing: Philippines' House of Representatives Investigates 290K+ Excess Deaths Correlated with Experimental Vaccines DOH has let us down, has refused to admit that people are dying, turning a blind eye to the people who are getting sick, turbo cancers, myocarditis, children who are suddenly sick as if they are 60-70 aussie17.com
_aussie17
Posted - April 28, 2024 at 3:59 PM
Saved - April 29, 2024 at 5:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A senior oncologist in Japan, Prof. Fukushima, criticizes mRNA vaccines, calling them "evil practices of science." He highlights the emergence of a new type of cancer, dubbed "turbo cancer," which is rapidly progressing and difficult to detect. He also mentions excess mortality in specific cancers, autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases, and encounters with rare conditions. Prof. Fukushima believes opposing vaccines should not lead to outcasting and dismisses the vaccines as defective and based on misconceptions. He calls for comprehensive research and urges against using such vaccines again.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Japan's Most Senior Oncologist, Prof. Fukushima Condemns mRNA Vaccines as 'Evil Practices of Science' Highlights I am the most senior medical oncologist in Japan. I was the first to open a cancer outpatient clinic at Kyoto University, and before that, in Kyoto University, in 2020, I was the head of a section at the Aichi Cancer Center, all positions were at the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital. I established the first course in pharmacoepidemiology at Kyoto University in Japan. ... People are saying about what's being called "turbo cancer," a type previously unseen by doctors, characterized by its incredibly fast speed. By the time it's discovered, it is already in stage four, advanced cancer, and such cases are starting to sporadically appear in consultations. Thus, doctors began sharing information about these extraordinary cases that are different from before. So, this has gradually become the situation since last year or the year before that. Indeed, doctors have been sensing from the field that something unusual related to cancer may be happening. They were feeling it on the ground. ... Moreover, the results of our analysis show, surprisingly, that specific types of cancer, in relation to the vaccination, seem to be experiencing excess mortality. Firstly, cancers such as breast cancer, ovarian cancer, thyroid cancer, and then statistically, esophageal and lung cancer. These are, and another one is prostate cancer in men. Such cancers are specifically observing excess mortality. This phenomenon cannot be simply explained by disruptions such as early screenings being unavailable due to the pandemic, or lost opportunities for treatment. ... It's as if we've opened Pandora's box and are now encountering all sorts of diseases. We're facing them. Autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and infections. All of these, including rare and difficult diseases, even those rare conditions are happening. Even diseases unheard of are being encountered by ordinary doctors. ... This isn't science; it's more akin to faith, hysteria, or even cult behavior, in my opinion. Opposing vaccines doesn't make one a heretic like Galileo; it's become like being treated as a complete outcast. That's the situation. This is madness. ... We really must take these damages seriously and address them earnestly. Any efforts to dismiss these damages as if they didn't happen are, frankly, the work of evil. This is a quintessential example of the evil practice of science. ... Therefore this vaccine was from the beginning based on misconception, misconduct, and evil practices of science, totally defective, founded on misconceptions, leading to a totally false production, a false product, I believe. ... We must confront this directly again and shine the light of science on it, so the WHO should lead a comprehensive outcome research on this gene vaccine used on humanity on a large scale for the first time, and all countries should cooperate with it. We should never again use such vaccines. This is a shame for humanity. It's a disgrace!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, a medical professor in Japan, discusses the need to raise awareness about medical complications related to COVID-19 vaccines. They highlight specific cases of adverse effects, including a 28-year-old man who died after receiving the vaccine. The speaker questions the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines, criticizing the World Health Organization (WHO) for its handling of the vaccination campaign. They argue that the vaccines should not have been approved and that the WHO lacks the necessary expertise. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of conducting comprehensive research on the outcomes and damages caused by the vaccines. They express concern about the decline of science and the need for transparency in reporting vaccine-related incidents.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: ご 質 問 ありがとうございます 。私は 日 本 で 最 も 年 長 な メディカル ・ ロン ・ コル ジス です。 で メディカル ・ ロン ・ コル ジス を 日 本 語 に 訳 す と 主 張 な い か って いう ん です が 、これ 私 が 最 初 に そう いう 名 称 で 新 た な ディ シ プリン と し て 普 及 する 、普及 さ せ 、定 着 さ せる こと を キャンペーン 法 を やっ て い き ます。私は 日 本 で 初め て 京 都 大 学 に が ん の アウト ペー ション クリニック を 開 設 し た わけ です し、その 前 に 京 都 大 学 に は 2020 年 に 愛知 県 が ん センター 、 前職 は 愛 知 県 西 センター ホ スピ タル の セ クション 返 答 し て お り ま し た 。 アメリカ の 講 師 。そこ で 京都 大 学 に ファー マック エ ピ デ ミ オ ロジー の 講 座 を 日 本 で 最 初 に 作っ た わけ です 。やはり 、ターボ ガン と 言わ れる タイプ 、今 ま で に 医 師 が 経験 し て な い よう な 非常 に スピード が 速 い 。 見 つかっ た 時 に は もう 4 期 で ある 進 行 し た が ん で ある と いう ケース が ちらほら 診察 に 訪 れる こと に な っ て 、それ で 今 ま で と そう いう ふう に 違 う ということ を 医 師 同 士 が や は り 情報 を 共 有 し 合う よう に な っ て ま し た 。 です から それ が 去年 、一昨 年 ぐらい から です ね 、だんだん そういうこと だ と 。やはり が ん に 関連 し て 、この 異 常 な こと が 起 こ っ て る ん じゃ な い か と いう の は 、医師 は 現 場 から 感じ 取っ て い ま し た 。だから こ の 今 回 、しかも こ の 解析 し た 結 果 から は です ね 、 驚く べ き こと に 特定 の が ん 種 が です ね ワクチン 接種 等 関連 し て 増 え 、あの 腸 化 脂 肪 が 起 き て いる よう に 見 える ということ です 。まず は 乳がん と か 卵 巣 が ん と か 、 膵臓 が ん と か 、それ から 統 計 部 の です ね 、 乗員 と 口腔 が ん です ね 。これ ら が もう 一 つ は 男 性 の 前立 腺 が ん 、こう いう が ん が 特 異 的 に 超 過 死 亡 、これ は 人 為 的 だ と か な 、つまり パン デミック に よっ て 検 診 っ て いう の は 早期 に 受 診 で き なかっ た 、あるいは 治 療 を 受け る 機 会 を ロス し た と か いう こと で は 全 然 説明 で き な い 現 象 だ と 思い ます。 が です から レ ビュー し た 症例 は です ね 、僕 解 放 も さ れ て る んですけど も 、ワクチン に よっ て 心 臓 が 溶 け た 、平 択 言 え ば 心筋 の 訪問 菌 融 解 に よっ て 亡 く な っ た 2 8 歳 の 男 性 で 、今 ま で 医 者 に かかっ た こと が な い 人 が 、あ や ざ ん の 二 回 目 の ワクチン を 打っ た 一 日 後 に 朝 、奥 さ ん が 起こし に 行っ た ら 死ん で た っ て いう 。 で 、当然 こと な が ら 警 察 を 呼 ん で 、それ で 大 学 病 院 に 運 ん で、そこ で 介 護 する と 。 介 護 士 田 先 生 と 話 し た ら 、介護 士 先 生 は 心臓 を 取り 出そう と 思っ た ら フニャフニャ で 仰 天 し た っ て 言っ て る ん です。 心 臓 が どう です か 。 ふにゃふにゃ な っ た 。まあ こ の よう な 症例 も ある ということ は 、もう そ の 一連 を 持っ て し も 、いかに こ の ワクチン が 危 険 か ということ は わ か る わけ です 。だから 私 から 見 れ ば ね 、健康 な 人 が 今 ま で 病 気 が なかっ た 人 、いつ 死ぬ か わかん な い 人 じゃ なく て 、健康 で 何 も 問 題 なかっ た 人 が ワクチン を 打っ て 死ん だ と いう の は 重大 です よ 、これ は 殺 人 です よ 、結局 は 。 私 は そう いう ふう に は っきり 言 い た い です 。これ は やっぱり 重大 な 話 だ と 思い ます 。その こと に つい て 、マスコミ も き ち っ と 報 道 は し な い し です 新聞 も 取り 上げ な い 。これ は やっぱり 歪 ん で ます 。私は 今 は 医 学 の 危機 、医療 の 危機 の み な ら ず 、科学 の 重大 な 危機 で あり 、 民主 主 義 の 危機 で ある いう ふう に 私 は 非常 に 危機 感 を 募 ら せ て い ます 。 科 学 者 と し て 医 者 と し て です ね 、この ワクチン は 断じ て 国 家 レベル で やる べ き も の で は なかっ た し 、本来 は こ の ワクチン が 承 認 さ れ て 、何 て 言 う か な 、あの 指 標 に 出 る も の で は なかっ た と いう ふう に 私 は 断定 し ます 、現 時 点 で は 。 は。 W HO が これ 全 国 の です ね 、医療 市 場 も 違 う し 、習慣 も 違 う し 、制度 も 違 う 国 に つい て 一 律 に ワクチン 接種 を WHO 指 揮 を 取っ て やる と いう の は 根 本 的 に 間 違っ て ます から 。 医 療 は 、人々 の 生 活 習 慣 、そして 医 療 制 度 それ から そ の 国 の 法 律 制 度 、そして カルチャー に よっ て 違 う わけですよ 。だから 一 律 に ね 、これ を 地 球 強 で ワクチン も 進める っ て いう の は 、これ は 遺 伝 子 ワクチン で あ ろう が な かろう が それ は ちょっと お か し い と 思い ます 。 天 然 痘 の ワクチン で 成 功 し た 方 が ね 、コロナ の ワクチン で 同 じ よう に 成 功 する と は 限ら な い し 、 ま し て イン フル エン ザ で も 全 然 成 功 なんか し て な い わけ です です し 、日本 で も 、もう す で に 何十 年 も 前 に イン フル エン ザ ワクチン は 5 で ある と いう レ ポート ま で 出 て る に も かかわら ず ワクチン を せっせと を 進め た り し た り し て る わけ です が 、やっぱり 狂 っ て ます よ 。 これ は もう 科 学 で は なく て ね 、信仰 、あるいは 邪 教 、あるいは も っ と 言っ て し まえ ば カル ト と 言っ て み よう と ね 。私は そこ ま で 思い ます 。 です けど も 、ワクチン に つい て 反 対 する と ね、 ガリ レオ の 痛 み も ん じゃ 甘 い し ね 。まる で ね 、異 教 徒 扱 い に なる わけですよ 。これ は ね 、 狂 っ て ます 。 W HO に そ ん だけ の 能 力 は な い は ず な ん です よ ね。だから ワクチン で 被 害 を 受け た こと 、W HO も 分かっ て る から 、その ポン ペン 制 度 する た め に W HO い く つ か の 国 に 対 し て 、 Developer count ry 、 カント リー カント リー カント リー に 対 し て です ね 、被害 救 済 制 度 を W HO が 提 供 する と 。 ヨーロッパ も アメリカ も 中 国 、日本 も 韓国 も です ね 、被害 者 に 救 済 制 度 を 持っ て ます から 、それ に ディ ペン ド オン に し て ね 、製造 物 責 任 を 我 々 が 要 求 で き な い よう な こと は 絶 対 に お か し い と いう ふう に 私 は 思い ます し 、 ま し て W HO で そ ん だけ の ね 、能力 を 持ち う る は ず が な い 。それ だけ の サイエンス の ベース を W HO は 一 切 持っ て ま せ ん から 、すごく 無 責 任 です。 で 、各国 政 府 は こ の W HO に 判 断 を 乱 れる こと は し て は い け な い と いう の が 私 の 基 本 です 。基本 的 な 指定 です 。だから ここ に いる 、 き くち も こ の ファースト 論 文 の コー サー です けど も 、彼 が ま と め た 論 文 は 、イスラエル と パ レス チ ナ 、 ヨルダン 、 シリア そして エジプト と 比較 し て 、イスラエル が 最 も たくさ ん ワクチン を 早期 に 世界 で 先 駆 け て 打っ た 国 だ けど 、一番 たくさ ん 死 亡 者 出 し た の は イス ラ エル だ し 、そして 一 番 たくさ ん 感 染 者 出 し た の は イス ラ エル で 、ワクチン あ まり 先 生 と 駐 車 で き なかっ た ところ は そんな に 被 害 を 受け て な い わけですよ 。 イス ラ エル が い ち 早く ワクチン は や め た と 思い ます ね。 だ から こう いう 事 実 、今 、W HO は 全 世界 の そ の ワクチン 接種 の アウト カム に つい て 、そして そ の 被 害 に つい て 、ダメージ に つい て 、レ プシ ット に つい て 、W HO が 責 任 持っ て 調査 し て 報 告 書 を 出す べ き 。これ は W HO に 私 は 強行 に 要 求 し た い と 思い ます 。 W HO それ も せ ず に しかも 遺 伝 子 ワクチン な ん て 全 く の クソ です よ 。全く の つ だ と 。 遺 伝 子 を 人 の 中 に 導 入 する っ て 遺 伝 子 治 療 で しょう ね。 そんな も の ワクチン に し て どう する の ということ です よ ね。これ メッセージ ある い ね を ナ ノ パー ティ クル に 踏 まえ し て 投与 し た ら ね な ん て いう の か な オファー ゲット エフェクト と ば っ かり 出 る わけですよ 。 で 事 実 、卵 巣 は じめ ね 、脳 に も それ から 肝 臓 に も 脾 臓 に も 骨髄 に も 、一番 問 題 は 骨髄 に 行 く ということ 、それ から 卵 巣 と か そう いう リ プロ ダ クティブ オー ガン 行く ということ ね 。もう あり と あ ら ゆ る 臓 器 に それ が 行き 渡 る 、しかも それ が です ね 、1 年 以上 経っ て も ね 、 ブツ ブツ で き た 皮 疹 の 中 に スパイ ク タンパク が 検 出さ れる と いう の は 、これ スパイ ク タンパク 作っ て る て ます よ 、そんな も の は 。そん な スパイ ク タンパク が そこ の ところ で 一 年 前 の が 残っ て て ね 、それ で 変色 さ れる っ て こと は な い 、これ 新 た に 出 し た 日 本 の コーチ 大 学 の サン プロ フェ ッサ ー サン の 論 文 です けど ね いう こと も 分かっ て き て る わけですよ 。そし て こう いう 論 文 も き ち っ と 精 査 し た 上 で 、W HO は と に か く 私 を 推 進 し た ん だ から 、この 始 末 は W HO が つけ て き と いう の が 私 の 意 見 です 。まあ ふざけん な ということ です よ これ ね。 科 学 の 乱 用 悪用 、E ビル ・ クラッチ ス を サイエンス と 断定 し て い る。 な い から イン フレ ネ ダル 悪 人 も 打た な い し 、もちろん こんな も の も 馬 鹿 みたい か な と 思っ て ま し た から 。だから こんな も 打っ て な い 。だけど これ で 以 外 受け た 人 ね 、赤ちゃん を 残し て 28 歳 男 性 死ん じゃ っ た ん です よ 。 朝 行っ た ら 奥 さ ん から 死ん で る の を 受け た 。 冗 談 じゃ な い で しょ 、こんな こと 起 こ す わけ 一 年 死ん だ だけ で 持っ て け た 。 ところ が 日 本 の 場合 、死亡 国 が 二千 何百 も ある ん です よ 。 二千 何百 も 死ん で る ん だ 。 ワクチン で 死ん だ ん です よ 、それ は 。 これ 20 3 4 件 の 死 亡 例 。これ は ね 私 が 集 計 し た ん じゃ な い 。政府 が ちゃん と 報 告 を 受け て ネット に 上げ て る 数 です。 これ は 死 亡 例 ね。 今 も っ て 医 師 に 語 ら な い と い け な い 人 が 何 万 人 も いる ん です よ 。その うち の 30 は ME 、C FS 慢性 表彰 工 具 です よ 。まだ 決 着 が つい て な い 治 療 です 。これ に 対 し て ビ タミン D が どう も 効果 が ある ということ を 我 々 の 仲 間 が 見 つけ て 今 論 文 を 作 成 中 です。 この 被 害 と 我 々 は 本 当 に ね 真剣 に こ の 取り組ま な い と い け な い わけですよ 。この 被 害 を なかっ た こと に し よう な ん て いう よう な 動き は ね 、それ は 悪 魔 の 所 業 ですよね 。 E b in practice of science の 典型 で 私 た ち は 、あらゆる 疾 患 を パンドラ の 箱 を 開け た よう に 我 々 は あ ら ゆ る 疾 患 に 遭 遇 し て る わけ です よ 。もう 自己 免 疫 疾 患 、神経 変 性 疾 患 、 癌 、それ から 患 者 。 後 編 全 部 に 対 し て それ が ね 、しかも 気 象 難 病 ま で ね レア ・ ハー ディ スコ ディ DS 。 気 象 性 、気象 の 難 病 ま で ね 、起こ っ て る。 聞い た こと の な い 病 気 ま で リスク 通 信 者 が 起 こ っ て る と リ ピー ト 7 パー ティ クル っ て いう タイプ の 今 回 の D DS は 全 く の 失 敗 です 。だから こ の ワクチン は 初め から ビス コ セ クション 、それ から と それ から トー タリー ファー ミス プロ ダクション ということ だ と 思い ます ね 。私は ここ ま で 薬 剤 疫学 の 日 本 で 初め て 作っ た 人 間 と し て 責 任 が ある から ね。 私 は もう リ タイ ア し た 人 間 です 。だけど 研究 所 主 催 し て る し サイエンス は 自 分 の 家 業 だ から 自 分 の ミッション と し て 続け て る わけ です けど だ けど やっぱり ね ここ へ 来 て みんな が ね 、 シェル 、 サイエンス が ひ る ん で し か も ね 、 パラリンピック やっ て 検閲 を し て る わけですよ 。これ サイエンス コミュニティ 崩 壊 です よ 、退 廃 です よ こんな こと が あっ て は な ら な い 。もう 一 度 正 面 から こ の サイエンス で サイエンス の 光 を 当 て な きゃ い け な い から W HO は 、この 世界 で 初め て 人 類 に 使っ た 大 規 模 に 使っ た そ の 遺 伝 子 ワクチン に つい て 、 Comp re hen s ive な アウト カム リサーチ を 指 揮 する べ き で 、各国 は それ に 協 力 する べ き です よ 。 もう こう いう よう な ワクチン を 使 う ということ は 二 度 と あっ て な ら な い ん です 。これ は もう 人 類 も ね 、あの シェ リウス 恥 です。 こんな こと やっ た ん です 。私は そう 思っ て い ます 。 本 気 で 言 い ます っ て ね 、本気 で 。ここ ま で 本 気 で 今 ま で 言っ て な い 。 ずっと 控 え て た けど 、これ は 国 際 的 な 問 題 っ て 言っ た ら 冨 永 禄 から で き て ね 、ああ いう あんな よう な タイプ で ね サイエンス を も て 遊 ん で は い た ん です よ 。 ダン ト タイプ な ん て サイエンス が 妥 協 し た ら 終 わり な ん だ ね。これ は もう 常 に 過 去 の 概 念 と 過 去 の 知 識 を 破 壊 する っ て いう の が サイエンス 。これ は サイエンス 。過去 の 知 識 に こだわっ て それ を 適 用 し た ら それ は 宗 教 信 仰 な ん だ

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Sources, writeup and emailable format here https://www.aussie17.com/p/japans-most-senior-oncologist-prof

Japan's Most Senior Oncologist, Prof. Fukushima Condemns mRNA Vaccines as 'Evil Practices of Science' "...This isn't science! It's more akin to faith, hysteria, or even cult behavior, in my opinion..." aussie17.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

ORIGINAL SOURCE https://odysee.com/@CMSi:9/fukushimaJAP:e?r=28H2QKWiRrQq74J312wXt5o15QWgtxaK

Prof. Masanori Fukushima - Vaccination mRNA for COVID-19 and unprecedented disaster: acute death and increased cancer mortality rate (original Japanese language) Prof. Masanori Fukushima is Professor Emeritus of the University of Kyoto, Director of the Translational Research Center for Medical Innovation, and the Foundation for Biomedical Research and Innovati... odysee.com
_aussie17
Posted - April 17, 2024 at 8:01 AM
Saved - April 17, 2024 at 2:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A major press conference in Japan highlights lawsuits seeking compensation for COVID-19 vaccine victims. Family members of victims tearfully share their experiences, including the difficulties of the autopsy. The media coverage of vaccine damage is being substituted for coronavirus damage, and the country is pushing for vaccination while ignoring the immense damage caused. The author questions the responsibility placed on individuals who signed the vaccination ticket and calls for the country to take responsibility.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Happening now in Japan From @Lizzy_channel_ (Lizzy News) Breaking News: The biggest press conference ever held by major media outlets in lawsuits seeking compensation from COVID-19 vaccine victims (personal experience) After this, the victim's family members tearfully spoke about the facts, including the difficulties of the autopsy. We will post a video of the press conference later, so please share it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
若い独身者がワクチン接種で死亡しても、補償は数十万円しかない。一方、高齢者の死亡補償は一律4000円から20万円と不公平。集団訴訟は、3年間続いたワクチン接種に対する不正義を正すことを目的とする。 Translation: Even if a young single person dies from the vaccine, they receive only tens of thousands of yen in compensation. In contrast, elderly individuals who pass away receive a flat rate of 4,000 to 200,000 yen, which is unfair. The purpose of the class action lawsuit is to correct the injustices towards the public regarding the vaccine administration over the past three years.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 被害 救 済 成 分 で は 、例えば 若 い 世 代 の 方 が 独 身 で 単 身 で 暮らし て い た 場合 ワクチン 接種 で 死 亡 し た と 認 め ら れ て も 数十 万 円 の 総 裁 料 し か 給 付 さ れ ま せ ん 。 一方 で 家 族 を 休 ん で い な い 高齢 の 方 も お 亡 く なり に な っ て も 、一 律 4000 円 と 20 万 円 の 被 害 を 書 く と 比較 し て あまり に も 均衡 を 借り て お り ます こう い っ た 国 が こ の 3 年 間 続け て き た 新 型 コロ ナ ワクチン 接種 に 関する 、国民 に 対 する 数 々 の 不 正 義 を 正 す と いう の が 今 回 の 集 団 訴 訟 の 目 的 です。

@_aussie17 - aussie17

SOURCE TWEET https://t.co/7jyPneb11q

@Lizzy_channel_ - Lizzy

速報　新型コロナワクチン被害者による国賠請求訴訟記者会見 これまでで最大の主要メディア(個人の体感) この後被害者遺族が解剖の大変さを含めて涙ながらに事実を語られています この後記者会見の動画を配信します 是非拡散お願いします #新型コロナワクチン #ワクチン　#ワクチン被害者 @kuwagenki https://t.co/R5XAy3vwQZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
若い独身者がワクチン接種で死亡しても補償が少ない一方、高齢者の死亡には20万円の保障がある。集団訴訟の目的は、3年間続いたワクチン接種における不正義を是正すること。 Translation: Even if young single individuals die from vaccine shots, they receive minimal compensation, while elderly deaths are guaranteed up to 200,000 yen. The purpose of the class-action lawsuit is to rectify the injustices towards the public during the three-year vaccination period.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 被害 救 済 制 度 で は 、例えば 若 い 世 代 の 方 が 独 身 で 単 身 で 暮らし て い た 場合 ワクチン 接種 で 死 亡 し た と 認 め ら れ て も 数十 万 円 の 総 裁 料 し か 給 付 さ れ ま せ ん 。 一方 で 、家族 を 休 ん で い な い 高齢 の 方 の お 亡 く なり に な っ て も 、一 日 4000 400 円 と 20 万 円 の 被 害 保 障 が な さ れる よう に 比較 し て あまり に も 均衡 を 借り て お り ます 。こう い っ た 国 が こ の 3 年 間 続け て き た 新 型 コロ ナ ワクチン 接種 に 関する 、国民 に 対 する 数 々 の 不 正 義 を 正 す と いう の が 今 回 の 集 団 訴 訟 の 目 的 です。

@_aussie17 - aussie17

https://t.co/cWqccO2AU9

@Lizzy_channel_ - Lizzy

これまでのワクチン関連の記者会見では最大の記者・報道陣かと思います これまでの私が取材した中では大手メディアがたくさん来てます 動画撮影もただ撮るというこれまでの感じではなさそうです #ワクチン #ワクチン被害 https://t.co/VjLNmrSrXl

@_aussie17 - aussie17

https://t.co/gK6IsipDaS

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Major Japanese Press Conference happening now. --------------- They were stirring up that the vaccine should be taken for people with diseases, so my spouse and I stupidly believed that that just getting this vaccine would definitely save us and we got vaccinated. Two days later, while I was on a day off going back to my parents' house, he passed away alone An autopsy was also conducted. I wasn't satisfied because many of our customers were doctors, they said to perform the autopsy anyway because if you leave the cells, they can be examined again with the latest technology later on. So the advice was to go ahead with the autopsy anyway. Okay. Based on the suggestion to preserve the cells, we had the pathologist perform the autopsy. The autopsy was conducted. And I was not satisfied either. The reason is that the pathologist said the vaccine was 100% not related. At that time, even the minister said that it's absolutely impossible to die from the vaccine. "Has anyone acknowledged this?" was the question posed. The pathologist told me that all you can do now is to conduct late-night consultations and honor your husband's memory. That's all you were told you could do. Even if you were to take the cells everywhere, or even talk to a university hospital, just to work on a single cell would cost 300,000 yen, and to work on all the cells would cost tens of millions of yen. Either way, you were laughed at with the notion that even if you sued the government, you'd lose. At that time, I thought it was absolutely terrible. What I'm thinking about now, beyond the process of death, is the immense damage caused by the coronavirus vaccine and how the country continues to ignore it and pushes for vaccination. They proceed. Meanwhile, they relentlessly pressure private companies to the fullest. The vaccine damage are not shared with the public. Not at all. Neither information nor the media are disseminated. They make the damages from the new coronavirus vaccine seem smaller or ignore them altogether, as if to suggest it's being circulated in such a way. That’s what I've thought over these three years. People are dying, and the reality of what is happening is being hidden. They are gone. There are people currently existing who suffer from side effects and damages, yet, even this is hardly broadcasted by the media. Almost not at all. What infuriates me the most is the way the new coronavirus vaccine damage is being substituted for coronavirus damage and disseminated by the media. I also feel stifled by this and really think, what kind of country is this, you know? Even before and now, after getting vaccinated, I think the information being spread by the country to Japan is impure. "Please get vaccinated." "After that, it's your responsibility." I absolutely think this situation is wrong. Because you signed the vaccination ticket, it's all on you. I got vaccinated because of the media's guidance. I believed in the country. In the end, the country says it’s your responsibility because you signed the vaccination ticket. It’s your responsibility. What does that even mean? You can't make the decision not to get it to get it. You can't judge that one step wrong could lead to death. Really? What kind of shot is that? In the end, I believe my husband wanted to live. I think my husband truly regretted it. The country really should take responsibility. That's all. -------------- H/T:@Lizzy_channel_

Video Transcript AI Summary
私たちはワクチンを打つべきだと思い、打ちました。しかし、その後、家族が亡くなりました。解剖医はワクチンとの因果関係はないと言いました。ワクチンの被害を隠していると感じ、国に責任を取ってほしいと思っています。 We believed in getting vaccinated, but after doing so, a family member passed away. The pathologist stated there was no causal relationship with the vaccine. Feeling that the vaccine's adverse effects are being concealed, I believe the country should take responsibility.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 疾患 の ある 人 間 から 打 つ べ き だ っ て いう の で 、 煽 り 立て て ま し た の で 、私 ら 夫 婦 は 泡 みたい に 正 直 言 う て 、もう こ の ワクチン だけ 打 て ば 、絶対 助 か る と 思っ て 打ち ま し た 。 で 、二 日 後 に 私 が 実 家 休み の 日 、実家 に 帰っ て る 間 に 一人 で 亡 く な っ て ま し た 。 で 、介護 も し ま し た 。 納 得 い か なかっ た ん で 、 で うち やっぱり お 客 様 に お 医 者 様 が 多 かっ た ん で 、細胞 を 置い と い た ら もう 一 回 最 新 に 後 で もう 一 回 調べ て も ら える から 解 剖 し な さ い 。 解 剖 を 置い と け ば い い っていうこと で 解 剖 医 に 解 剖 し て も ら い ま し た 。そし て 私 も 納 得 い か なかっ た なぜ か と いう と 解 剖 医 は ワクチン と は 100 因果 関係 は な い そ の 時 の 大 臣 も ワクチン で は 絶 対 なく な ら な い 誰 か 認 め て ます か ということ を 言わ れ ま し た 。その 解 剖 医 から は あ な た に できる 言葉 、あと 般若 し ん ど やっ て ご 主 人 の ご も ら い が ち を する こと しか な い っ て 言わ れ ま し た 。あな た が これ から 細 胞 を あ っち こっち に 持っ て 行っ て も 、大学 病 院 で 言 う て も 、一 つ の 細 胞 を する に は 30 万 円 全 みんな の 細 胞 を し よう と 思っ た ら 何千 万 円 かかる と 、あんた ど っち に し た っ て 国 に 訴 え て も 負け る で っ て で 笑 わ れ ま し た 。私は そ の 時 、 く そ っ た れ と 思い ま し た 。 で 、あと それ は 家 庭 、 死ん だ 家 庭 な んですけど も 、今 思っ て る こと は 莫大 な 被 害 が 出 て いる コロ ナ ワクチン に 対 し て 首 が スル ー し 続け 、 接種 を 進め る 一 方 で 民 間 企 業 へ は と こと ん 追い込む ワクチン の 起 点 は 国 民 に 共 有 さ れ て な い 、情報 も マス コミ も 流さ な い 、新型 コロ ナ ワクチン の 被 害 を 見せ て る か 、無視 する よう に 、一部 そう いう ふう に 流 し て いる よう に 私 は もう こ の 三 年 間 思い ます 現実 に 起 き て いる こと を 絶 対 隠 し て いる 人 が 、現実 に 起 き て いる こと を 隠 し て る 、人 が 亡 く な っ て る 副 作用 被 害 に 苦 し む 人 々 、現在 現存 し て いる の に それ も マス コミ で は ほ と ん ど 流さ な い あ と 一番 私 の 頭 き て いる こと は 新 型 コロ ナ ワクチン 被 害 を 新 型 コロ ナ ワクチン の 被 害 を 新 型 コロ ナ 被害 に つ り 替え て 、マスコミ に 流 し て る 、これ は 私 も 憤 り を 感 じ て 、本当 に な ん て いう 国 や ね ん な と 思っ て お り ます 。 ワクチン 打 つ 前 も 今 に し て も 国 が こ の 日 本 に 流 し て いる 情報 は 不 十 分 だ と 思い ます 。 ワクチン を 打っ て ください 、あと は 自己 責任 、この 自 体 が 絶 対 お か し い と 思い ます 。 接種 券 に 退 院 し た から 自己 責 任 、マスコミ の ユー ドル 打ち ま し た 、国 を 信 じま し た 。だけど も 最 後 に は 国 接種 券 に サイン を し た 自己 責 任 どう いう こと な ん です か 打た な い と 判 断 で き な い 一 歩 間 違え て 死 亡 箋 と 判 断 で き な い 注 射 な ん て な ん て いう 注 射 な ん です か 最後 です けど も 、私 の 主 人 は 生 き て たかっ た と 思い ます 主 陣 も ほん ま に 無 念 だ っ た と 思い ます 。本当 、国 は 責 任 と っ て ください 。以上 です。
_aussie17
Posted - April 11, 2024 at 2:33 AM
Saved - April 12, 2024 at 8:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The author, Masayasu Inoue, a professor in Japan, expresses concern about human rights abuse in the context of COVID-19 vaccinations. They argue that the pandemic was used as a pretext to rush vaccine development, resulting in the use of a dangerous and untested method. The author criticizes the Japanese government for promoting vaccines without proper informed consent and highlights the alarming number of vaccine-related injuries in Japan. They also raise concerns about the government's plans to develop new vaccines and participate in large-scale clinical trials. The author calls for international collaboration to stop these actions and emphasizes the importance of sharing the truth about vaccines globally.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 A Message from Japan to the world! Please share and distribute! Thank you very much for giving me this valuable opportunity to send my message about human rights abuse in the time of COVID-19. My name is Masayasu Inoue, Professor Emeritus of Osaka City University Medical School. My specialty is Molecular Pathology and Medicine. The pandemic was used as a false pretext by the WHO to drive vaccinations of all peoples in the world. A plan was set up to shorten the time to develop vaccines, which usually takes longer than ten years to less than one year. Operation Warp Speed. This operation was used to cover up the misconceptions of the genetic vaccines. Under the pretext of saving time, an extremely dangerous method was selected. That is, intramuscular injection of viral genes to produce toxic spike proteins directly in human tissues to stimulate immune system. Because this is a completely new method and misconceived method that has never applied before in human history, it is impossible, therefore, for most of doctors to give proper informed consent. However, due to irresponsible government and media campaigns to promote vaccines, 80% of the Japanese has been vaccinated. Unfortunately, seven shots have been done so far. This is the most and worst in the world. And the result was the induction of the terrible drug induced injury that has never seen in human history. I believe that the fraudulent use of experimental gene therapy to healthy people, particularly to healthy children, is an extreme violation of human rights. However, Keizo Takemi, Japanese Minister of Health, Labor and Welfare, has been insisting that there is no serious concern about the injury caused by genetic vaccines. And without learning from the current situation of injured patients, they plan to construct a new vaccine production system in preparation for the next pandemic. This is an unbelievable, crazy situation. The Japanese government is first in the world to approve a new type of vaccine called self replication replicon vaccine, and plans to start to supply it in this fall and winter. The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry is providing a huge amount of subsidies for this project. And factories to produce new vaccines are being built one after another in Japan. I visited these factories directly. Furthermore, the Japanese government is currently soliciting large scale clinical trials worth $900 million from pharmaceutical companies that are taking on the challenge of developing vaccines to prepare for the next pandemic by Disease X proposed during the Davos conference this year. It is speculated that the movement by the Japanese government is part of CEPI Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation's 100 days mission, which aims to shorten the time to one third of Operation Warp Speed. Namely, they are trying to shorten the vaccine business cycle by developing a vaccine in hundreds of days. This is possible only by ignoring the human rights perspective. Amendments to the WHO, International Health Regulation (IHR), and the so called Pandemic Treaty, which are about to be adopted at the 77th World Health assembly this year, are attempting to give rationality and legal binding force to such unscientific and dangerous crazy plans. If such things continue, there is high risk that Japan made vaccines will be exported under the guise for false trust. If Japan were to become a vaccine perpetrator, it would leave irreparable harm to future generations. Therefore, the actions of Japanese government MUST BE STOPPED by international collaborations. Although it has already been three years since I started to give lectures to educate Japanese people about the dangers of vaccines, it is still difficult to penetrate through the sound barriers of mainstream media. If we tell the truth about vaccines on YouTube, it is deleted within a day. The reality is that we are facing censorship and speech suppression almost every day. Therefore, I put my hope in the publication of a book with the last version of speech and published a book with a title "Withdraw From WHO" It is difficult to stop this movement because it is now politically hopeless to change the situation of the Japanese government. The message I would like to cover convey to the world is that when Disease X occurs in the future, you should never trust the Japan made vaccine that was developed in a short period of time in order to protect human rights in cases of control that transcend national boundaries. I believe that sharing the truth and countries is so important and that this is a step towards unity and solidarity. Only through the process of information exchange between all countries in the world, we can find hope in the midst of despair. I do hope that my statement will help all of you to protect your healthy life and your family. Thank you very much for your attention.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am Masayasu Inoue, a professor of molecular pathology. The COVID-19 pandemic led to rushed genetic vaccines causing unprecedented injuries. Japan's high vaccination rate resulted in severe adverse effects. The government plans to introduce new self-replicating vaccines despite risks. International collaboration is needed to stop these dangerous actions. Censorship hinders spreading vaccine dangers. Trust in Japan-made vaccines is cautioned against for future pandemics. Sharing information globally is crucial for unity and protection of human rights. Let's work together to safeguard our health and future. Thank you.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you very much for giving me this valuable opportunity to send my message about a human right abuse in the time of COVID 19. My name is Masayasu Inoue, professor emeritus of Osaka City University Medical School. My specialty is molecular pathology and medicine. The pandemic was used as a first pretext by the WHO to drive vaccinations of all peoples in the world. A plan was set up to shorten the time to develop functions which usually takes longer than 10 years to less than 1 year Operation Warp Speed. This operation was used to cover up the misconception of the genetic vaccines under the pretext of saving time. An extremely dangerous method was selected. That is intramuscular injection of viral genes to produce toxic spice proteins directly in human tissues to stimulate immune system because this is a completely new method and misconcept method that has never applied before in human history. It is impossible, therefore, for most of doctors to give proper informed consent. However, due to irresponsible government and media campaigns to promote vaccines. 80% of the Japanese has been vaccinated, unfortunately. 7th shot have been done so far. This is the most and worst in the world, and the result was the induction of the therapeutic drug induced injury that has never seen in human history. I believe that the fraudulent use of experimental gene therapy to healthy peoples, particularly to healthy children, is an extreme violation of human rights. However, Keizo Takami, Japanese minister of health, labor, and welfare, has been insisting that there is no serious concern about the injury caused by genetic vaccines. And without running from the current situation of injured patients, they plan to construct a new vaccine production system in preparation for the next pandemic. This is an unbelievable crazy situation. The Japanese government is the first in the world to approve a new type of vaccine called self replication repro replicon vaccine and plans to start to supply it in this fall and winter. The Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry is providing a huge amount of subsidies for this project, and the factories to produce new work chains are being built one after another in Japan. I visit these factories directly. Furthermore, the Japanese government is currently soliciting large scale clinical trials worth $900,000,000 from pharmaceutical companies that are taking on the challenge of developing vaccines to prepare for the next pandemic by disease x proposed during the Davos conference this year. It is speculated that the movement by the Japanese government is part of CEPI, Coalition For Epidemic Preparedness Innovations' 100 days mission, which aims to shorten the time to 1 third of operation warp speed. Namely, they are trying to shorten the vaccine business cycle by developing a vaccine in 100 days. This is possible only by ignoring the human right perspective. Amendment to the WHO, International Health Regulation, IHN, and the so called pandemic treaty, which are about to be adopted at the 77th World Health Assembly this year, attempting to give rationality and the legal binding force to such unscientific and dangerous crazy plans. If such things continue, there is a high risk that Japan made vaccine will be exported under the guise for 1st trust. If Japan were to become a peer paypalator, it would leave a repairable hand to future generations. Therefore, the actions of Japanese government must be stopped by international collaborations. Although, it has already been 3 years since I started to give lectures to educate Japanese people about the dangers of vaccines, it is still difficult to penetrate through the sound barriers of mainstream media. If we tell the truth about vaccines on YouTube, it is deleted within a day. The delay their, the reality is that we are facing censorship and speech suppression almost every days. Therefore, I put my hope in the publication of a book, which is the last version of speech, and published a book with a title, withdrawn from WHO. It is difficult to stop this movement because it is now politically hopeless to change the situation of the Japanese government. The message I would like to cover convey to the world is that when disease x occurs in the future, you should never trust the Japan made vaccine that was developed in a short period of time In order to protect human rights in cases of control that transcend national boundaries, I believe that sharing the truth and countries is so important and that this is a step towards unity and solidarity. Only through the process of information exchange between all countries in the world, We can find hope in the midst of despair. I do hope that my statement will help all of you to protect your healthy life and your family. Thank you very much for your attention.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

SOURCE https://www.nicovideo.jp/watch/so43640769

【WCH】井上正康・上條泉・柳澤厚生／日本からジュネーブへのメッセージ 日本語字幕版 【WCH】井上正康・上條泉・柳澤厚生／日本からジュネーブへのメッセージ 日本語字幕版 [社会・政治・時事] ★『第一回 環太平洋連合 インターナショナル・ウェビナー』日時：2024年4月14日(日)日本時間朝８時... nicovideo.jp

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Emailable format https://www.aussie17.com/p/a-message-from-japan-to-the-world

A Message from Japan to the World Delivered by Prof Masayasu Inoue, Professor Emeritus of Osaka City University Medical School. aussie17.com
_aussie17
Posted - April 9, 2024 at 7:48 AM
Saved - April 9, 2024 at 11:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Germany's Federal Ministry of Health is facing scrutiny as leaked documents from the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) suggest that lockdown measures were implemented despite low risk assessments. Investigative journalist Florian Warweg questions the ministry about the basis for these decisions, but the ministry refuses to comment. The release of the RKI files is changing the legal and tactical landscape, potentially holding those responsible for misleading the public accountable. The situation raises questions about the role of the World Health Organization (WHO) in giving orders to countries.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨🚨 A Developing Scandal in Germany! Germany's Federal Ministry of Health, BMG (Bundesministerium für Gesundheit), is walking on thin ice as 2000+ pages of documents from the RKI (Robert Koch Institute, which is the German federal government agency and research institute responsible for disease control and prevention), were released a few weeks ago. The RKI documents showed that the so-called pandemic was generally considered low risk to the population and severe lockdowns were not recommended, yet it is alleged that bureaucrats followed orders FROM OUTSIDE to lockdown and cripple the economy. WHO is "giving orders" to countries??? Watch the uncomfortable exchange between investigative journalist Florian Warweg (@FWarweg) and the BMG here! Transcript-------------------------- Florian Warweg: The question is directed to the BMG. From the public records of the RKI protocols, which were also a topic on March 25th, it is revealed that the RKI internally assessed the risk to the population as still low on February 24, 2020. This leads me to question the basis on which the BMG Deputy Director for Health Security,Heiko Rottmann-Großner on that very same day at the BMG meeting, recommended to several state secretaries of the Interior Ministry that the economy must now be shut down and preparations need to be made for lockdowns of an undetermined duration. As I am interested, as said, in the basis for that particular in the basis of that recommendation. BMG: Well, as you know, these are internal RKI protocols and as the BMG, we generally do not comment on them as the BMG. Florian Warweg: Okay, my question wasn't about the RKI protocols, but about the statements made by the BMG Under-Secretary. But then I'll try with a different question. It has also been emphasized repeatedly, both by your side and from the ministry's side, that the tightening of the risk assessment from March 17, 2020, was based on the lockdown decision within the RKI following a scientific debate was based on the lockdown decision within the RKI following a scientific debate and not, as partly reported by the media, due to political orders from the outside. Against this backdrop, I am again curious why, according to the RKI -lawyers, there are no documents or protocols to substantiate this debate, so to speak. I would also be interested to know how the BMG explains that the agency directly under it has no protocols about this scientific debate on this scientific debate concerning risk tightening. BMG: I can say it again, these are internal RKI protocols and everything has been said on this topic, no matter how often you ask. -------------------------------------

Video Transcript AI Summary
The BMG was asked about the discrepancy between the RKI's low-risk assessment in February 2020 and the recommendation for economic shutdown and indefinite curfews. The BMG declined to comment on internal RKI protocols. Additionally, questions were raised about the lack of documentation regarding the scientific debate within the RKI leading to the risk assessment change in March 2020. The BMG reiterated that the RKI protocols are internal and no further information would be provided.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Frage geht ans BMG. Aus den freigeklagten RKI Protokollen, die ja auch schon am fünfundzwanzigsten März Thema waren, geht unter anderem hervor, dass das RKI am vierundzwanzigsten Februar zweitausendzwanzig intern das Risiko für die Bevölkerung als weiterhin gering einschätzte. Das führt mich zu der Frage, auf welcher Grundlage der BMG Unter Abteilungsleiter für Gesundheitssicherheit, Heike Rottmann Krossner, just an demselben Tag beim Treppen im BMG mehreren Staatssekretären des Innenministerium empfahl, man müsse nun die Wirtschaft lahmlegen und Vorkehrungen für Ausgangssperren von unbestimmter Dauer treffen. Da würde mich, wie gesagt, die Grundlage dieser damaligen Empfehlung interessieren. Speaker 1: Na ja, wie Sie wissen, das sind interne RKI Protokolle und die kommentieren wir als BMW grundsätzlich nicht. Speaker 0: Gut, mir ging's ja nicht die RKI Protokoll, sondern die Aussagen des BMI und des Staatssekretärs. Aber dann versuch ich's noch mal mit 'ner anderen Frage. Es wurde ja jetzt auch von Ihrer und ministeriellen Seite mehrfach betont, dass die Verschärfung der Risikobewertung ab siebzehnten März zweitausendzwanzig auf Grundlage des Lockdowns innerhalb des RKIs gefallen sei nach einer wissenschaftlichen Debatte und nicht wie medial teilweise berichtet durch politische Anweisung von außen. Vor diesem Hintergrund würd mich wiederum interessieren, wieso es laut den RKI Anwälten keinerlei Dokumente oder Protokolle gibt, die diese Debatte sozusagen belegen. Da würde mich ebenfalls interessieren, wie das BMG denn erklärt, dass die ihm direkt unterstellte Behörde keinerlei Protokolle vorliegen hat über diese wissenschaftliche Debatte zur Risikoverschärfung. Ich kann's gern Speaker 1: noch mal sagen, es sind interne RKI Protokolle und zu diesem Thema ist auch alles gesagt, egal wie oft Sie fragen.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

SOURCE TWEET

@SHomburg - Stefan Homburg

Ist es denkbar, dass nach Fehlverhalten auf einer Polizeiwache das zuständige Innenministerium sagt: „Dies ist eine interne Angelegenheit der Polizeiwache, die wir nicht kommentieren”? Nein, das ist undenkbar. Es wäre das Ende des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Nur bei der Gesundheitspolitik ist es ständige Übung, jede Auskunft arrogant zu verweigern und darauf zu setzen, dass einige Medien bei der Verschleierung krassen Fehlverhaltens helfen. Am 24.02.2020 sah das @rki_de ausweislich der #RKIProtokolle ein „geringes Risiko”, während Bachelor-Volkswirt und Major d. R. Heiko Rottmann-Großner von Ausgangssperren faselte. Wohlgemerkt, er war und ist Unterabteilungsleiter im @BMG_Bund, so dass der Sprecher auch Auskunft über das eigene Handeln des Ministeriums ablehnt. Credit fürs Video und Lob für saubere journalistische Arbeit an @FWarweg.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Das RKI schätzte das Risiko am 24. Februar 2020 als gering ein, während das BMG am selben Tag Maßnahmen wie Wirtschaftsstilllegung und Ausgangssperren empfahl. Das BMG betont, dass die Risikobewertung ab dem 17. März 2020 auf wissenschaftlicher Basis und nicht durch politische Anweisungen erfolgte. Es wird jedoch festgestellt, dass es keine Dokumente oder Protokolle gibt, die diese wissenschaftliche Debatte im RKI belegen. Das BMG wiederholt, dass es sich um interne RKI Protokolle handelt und keine weiteren Informationen preisgeben wird. Translation: The RKI assessed the risk as low on February 24, 2020, while the BMG recommended measures such as economic shutdown and curfews on the same day. The BMG emphasizes that the risk assessment from March 17, 2020, was based on science and not political instructions. However, it is noted that there are no documents or protocols to support this scientific debate within the RKI. The BMG reiterates that these are internal RKI protocols and no further information will be disclosed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Frage geht ans BMG. Aus den freigeklagten RKI Protokoll, die ja auch schon am fünfundzwanzigsten März Thema waren, geht unter anderem hervor, dass das RKI am vierundzwanzigsten Februar zweitausendzwanzig intern das Risiko für die Bevölkerung als weiterhin gering einschätzte. Das führt mich zu der Frage, auf welcher Grundlage der BMG Unter Abteilungsleiter für Gesundheitssicherheit, Heike Rottmann Krossner, just an demselben Tag beim Treffen im BMG mehreren Staatssekretären des Innenministerium empfahl, man müsse nun die Wirtschaft lahmlegen und Vorkehrungen für Ausgangssperren von unbestimmter Dauer treffen. Da würde mich, wie gesagt, die Grundlage dieser damaligen Empfehlung interessieren. Speaker 1: Na ja, wie Sie wissen, das sind interne RKI Protokolle und die kommentieren wir als BMG grundsätzlich nicht. Speaker 0: Gut, mir ging's ja nicht die RKI Protokoll, sondern die Aussagen des BMI Unterstaatssekretärs, aber dann versuche ich's noch mal mit 'ner anderen Frage. Es wurde ja jetzt auch von Ihrer und ministeriellen Seite mehrfach betont, dass die Verschärfung der Risikobewertung ab siebzehnten März zweitausendzwanzig auf Grundlage des Lockdowns innerhalb des RKIs gefallen sei nach einer wissenschaftlichen und nicht wie medial teilweise berichtet durch politische Anweisung von außen. Vor diesem Hintergrund würd mich wiederum interessieren, wieso es laut den RKI Anwälten keinerlei Dokumente oder Protokolle gibt, die diese Debatte sozusagen belegen. Da würde mich ebenfalls interessieren, wie das BMG denn erklärt, dass die ihm direkt unterstellte Behörde keinerlei Protokolle vorliegen hat über diese wissenschaftliche Debatte zur Risikoverschärfung? Speaker 1: Ich kann's gern noch mal sagen, es sind interne RKI Protokolle und zu diesem Thema ist auch alles gesagt, egal wie oft Sie fragen

@_aussie17 - aussie17

More info on the #RKIFiles here HT @Kerstin90211504

@OlafGierhake - Prof. Dr. Dr. Olaf Gierhake

Hier meine unmassgebliche Analyse zu den #RKIFiles, Teil 2 (1/2) Also, in der Schweiz fangen die Bürger an, mit Strafklagen gegen verantwortliche Politiker und Behörden des Corona-Desasters vorzugehen. Ein Beispiel ist eine gut ausformulierte Klage gegen die medizinische Zulassungsbehörde der Schweiz, der Swissmedic. Und um dem Nachdruck zu verleihen, werden diese Strafklagen, in denen argumentativ eine saubere juristische Aufarbeitung der Tathandlungen der Akteure geschieht, in der Schweiz auch im Internet veröffentlicht. Es gibt sogar eine Website, die ich freilich über Google unter den Stichworten Corona-Anzeige-Swissmedic nicht gefunden habe, wohl aber hier: https://coronaanzeige.ch . Ich halte das für einen guten Ansatz, sich argumentativ und mit konkreten Rechtsmitteln dem Thema zu nähern, da die Politik, die Mainstream-Medien und auch die meisten Akteure von #WirHabenMitgemacht auch nach den RKIFiles weiterhin nach meiner Beobachtung eher mauern und keine Einsicht zeigen. Herrn Spahn würde es bekanntlich am besten gefallen, wenn wir uns viel verziehen. Wenn wir also weiterhin nichts tun, was den Tätern schaden und den Geschädigen nutzen könnte. Er hat extra dazu sogar ein Buch geschrieben, um auch daran noch zu verdienen. Die #RKIFiles verändern aber massgeblich die juristische und taktische Ausgangslage auch für Deutschland. Dies insofern, als dass das Standardargument der Staatsanwaltschaften und der Gerichte, das RKI hätte ja sauber alles geprüft und für „supi“ befunden, damit wie ein Kartenhaus in sich zusammengebrochen ist. Viele Akteure haben - nunmehr erwiesenermassen: entgegen besseren Wissens - einzeln die Bürger in ihrer individuellen Impfentscheidung getäuscht und kollektiv die Bevölkerung insgesamt über staatliche und massgeblich vom Staat gesteuerte Organisationen betrogen. Juristen nennen das „Vorsatz“ oder zumindest „grob fahrlässig“. Sie sind damit für die durch die „Impfung“ verursachten Schäden und Toten mitverantwortlich. Sie hätten sich eben nicht allein blind auf die Aussagen des RKI verlassen dürfen, die sich im Lichte der #RKIFiles nun als faktenwidrig und politisch gesteuert herausgestellt haben. Denkt man sich das korrumpierte RKI einmal weg, gibt es nämlich nicht viele Argumente für eine mangelhaft ausgetestete experimentelle gentechnische Behandlung an Millionen von Menschen in Deutschland. Auch der Verweis der Akteure, im Ausland hätte man ähnlich (bescheuert) agiert, hilft diesen unter Haftungsgesichtspunkten nicht. Denn der deutsche Steuerzahler leistet sich nunmal extra einen Wasserkopf namens RKI, der dann für Deutschland die Dinge auch kritisch beleuchten und sachgerecht im Interesse der Bevölkerung (und nicht im Sinne von vorgesetzten Politikern) beurteilen soll. Strafrechtlich sieht es für die Schädiger also nicht so gut aus. Zivilrechtlich ist die Sachlage für Geschädigte aber m.E. noch besser: Mindestens hätten „Impflinge“ nämlich in jedem Einzelfall ausführlich über die Chancen und Risiken der Behandlung für das eigene Leben aufgeklärt werden müssen. Meine Schwester Prof. Dr. Katrin Gierhake von der Uni Regensburg und Herr RA Carlos Gebauer (Fachanwalt für Medizinrecht) haben in einer viel beachteten juristischen Fachveröffentlichung im letzten Jahr nachgewiesen, dass genau diese zur Haftungsbefreiung der Ärzte (und deren Berufshaftpflichtversicherungen) rechtlich zwingend erforderliche ausführliche Aufklärung praktisch nie erfolgt ist. Nicht im Gespräch mit dem „Impfarzt“ und erst recht nicht in den sog. „Impfzentren“. Etwa unterschriebene Zettel mit Haftungsbefreiungserklärungen sind hiernach rechtlich unbeachtlich, was viele Impfopfer und ihre Angehörigen nicht wissen. Die Ausgangslage für durch die Impfung geschädigte Kläger könnte m.E. nicht besser sein. Einzelheiten hier: https://de.linkedin.com/posts/carlos-a-gebauer-2b92b0192_prof-dr-katrin-gierhake-und-ich-haben-uns-activity-7090350599136796672-WGBO (2/2) folgt im Kommentar

Corona Anzeige coronaanzeige.ch

@_aussie17 - aussie17

RELATED

@DigitalerC - ██████

Multipolar klagt RKI-Protokolle frei - Obwohl viel geschwärzt ist, beginnt bereits die Rumeierei! Liebe Zuschauer, das vergleichsweise kleine Magazin "Multipolar" hat es den Systemmedien vorgemacht und die Freigabe der RKI-Protokolle aus den Jahren 2020/21 gerichtlich erzwungen. Sehr vieles ist geschwärzt, was an sich eine Unverschämtheit ist, dennoch fühlen sich die Hardliner aus den Corona-Maßnahmen bereits verpflichtet, sich dazu zu äußern. Eure Rumeierei wird Euch nicht helfen. Ich vermute, es werden einige geopfert werden, damit nicht das Ganze zusammen bricht. Euer Thomas #RKIFiles #RKIProtokolle #RKI #Spahn #Laschet #Lauterbach #Merkel #Lockdown #Masken #Kinder #Impfpflicht #zdfheute

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the release of unredacted RKI protocols by Multipolar Magazine, which reveals that the lockdown measures were not based on scientific evidence but on political instructions. The speaker criticizes the mainstream media for their lack of interest in this issue and accuses them of being complicit in promoting government measures without questioning their effectiveness. The speaker also highlights the negative consequences of the lockdowns, such as increased child mortality and the neglect of other healthcare needs. The video concludes with a call for accountability and legal action against those responsible. The transcript is in German.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Grüße euch, liebe Zuschauer. Servus. Ja, nicht der Spiegel, nicht der Stern, nicht die Zeit, nicht die Süddeutsche, nicht die FAZ, auch nicht ZDF, ARD, RTL, ProSieben oder sonstige große oder auch kleine Konzernen und sonstige Medien haben die RKI Protokolle frei geklagt beziehungsweise zumindest erst mal es geschafft, dass 'n Teil, wir werden's gleich sehen, ungeschwärzt veröffentlicht wird. Das ist das Multipolar Magazin. Hier herausgegeben von Stefan Korinth und Paul Schreier. Hier RKI Protokolle, ZDF und Spiegel verfälscht nachträglich Ihre Berichte, da kommen wir noch dazu. Ich möchte jetzt erst mal nur dem Multiplar Magazin hier den Raum geben, den es sich verdient hat. Ohne die wäre es vielleicht gar nicht dazu gekommen, dass wir überhaupt irgendwie mal anfangen, hier eine wie auch immer geartete Aufarbeitung der Coronavorgänge, der Maßnahmen beschließen beschließen Beschlüsse und auch der Art und Weise, wie diese Beschlüsse zustande gekommen sind, ja. Da werden wir jetzt 'n bisschen mehr haben oder haben wir jetzt 'n bisschen mehr erfahren. Wir schauen mal rein. Hier, das meint der Epstein Liste der Account sechzig Sekunden RKI Files, darunter läuft es beziehungsweise Hashtag RKI Protokolle müssten doch helfen, im Aufwachprozess ein kleines Stückchen weiterzukommen. Sie haben uns verarscht, Sie verarschen uns immer noch, ja. Nur mal hier, das sind die geschwärzten oder zumindest teilweise geschwärzten Protokolle. Da fragt man sich teilweise schon bei manchen Seiten, warum geben Sie denn die Seite raus? Also ich hab Seiten gesehen, die sind vollkommen schwarz, ja, vollkommen geschwärzt hier. Aber sie konnten ja nicht alle schwärzen, weil sonst braucht man es ja gar nicht machen, dann wär das ja die totale vor für alle Welt offensichtliche Farce und das, was nicht geschwärzt ist, ist schon interessant genug, ja. Also damit die nicht wissen, was da da steht, wo es geschwärzt ist, weil wenn sie das stehen lassen mussten, das ist ja schon einiges, ja. Also wir laufen hier jetzt mal eine Minute durch mit dem Video. Hier zum Beispiel war es, glaube ich, ja. Moment. Ja hier, also ich meine, so eine Seite, hoher Arbeitsaufwand, dass im Lagencenterweiterung Personen personell in Arbeit, also das ist das Einzige, was wir da stehen lassen, ansonsten nur geschwärzt, ja. Es ist relativ wirklich eine Zeige oder nicht Zeige, sondern Mittelfingeraktion vom RKI, sage ich mal, Robert Koch Institut, die das hier veröffentlicht haben oder auf Zwang, ja, raus auf Klage. Das Gericht hat entschieden, sie müssen das veröffentlichen, aber eben hier seht das ja, ja, in welcher Form. Das bleibt dann dem RKI überlassen. Warum sind in den RKI Files, schützt deine Großeltern, schützt deine Kinder. Wir machen's wegen der Kinder, wir machen's wegen der vulnerablen Gruppen, wir machen's wegen der Schwachen und Kranken. Wir sind haben die richtigen Entscheidungen getroffen. Wir sind die besten, ja. Das kommt jetzt irgendwie grad 'n bisschen wenig, bis gar nicht. Also das ist wirklich wichtig. RKI falls dreißigster Zehnter zweitausendzwanzig laut diesem Protokoll, RKI bestätigt, dass es keine Evidenz für FFP2 Masken jemals gab. Die B-Bahn zum Beispiel fragt er hier, was sagt denn ihr dazu, die monatelang in mit der FFP2 Pflicht eure Kunden drangsaliert habt? Also was gibt es für Entschädigungen wegen der Nötigung? Es geht insgesamt diese Maskenpflicht, die ich Gott sei Dank, wie soll ich sagen, nicht mitgemacht hab einfach, ja. Die Einschränkungen sind im Dokumentklar dargestellt und es gibt keine Evidenz, also keinen Beweis für die Nutzung von FFP2 Masken außerhalb des Arbeitsschutzes. Dies könnte auch für die Öffentlichkeit zugänglich gemacht werden, ja, nur mal so. Und hier RKI falls, das RKI sagt, wichtiger offener Punkt, Enhanced Desease. Da geht's darum, wichtiger offener Punkt, Enhanced Desease, dies bedeutet, dass bei Impfdurchbrüchen stärkere Erkrankungen auftritt als bei Ungeimpften. Komisch, dass wir das alles schon erzählt haben, wir Schwurbler, wir Schwarzseher und wir Nazis und wir Quertreiber und Querdenker. Hier haben wir, muss mal schauen, ich bleib hier irgendwo. Ja, hier sind wir, alles klar. Stefan Aus, das muss man mal sagen, der Herausgräber der Welt, auch wenn die Welt eine eine eine wirklich schlimme Geschichte ist, aber hier muss man das auch mal bemerken, keine Evidenz, was wir jetzt gerade gesehen haben und bisherige Studien zur Wirksamkeit von FFP2 Masken daran gescheitert, dass Masken nicht oder nicht korrekt getragen wurden. Ihr Nutzen sollte auf Arbeitsschutz von Personen, die mit Infektionen und Patienten arbeiten, begrenzt bleiben Und Stefan Aust hat hier schon damals zweitausendzwanzig geschrieben, die Maske muss der Maske wegen getragen werden als Symbol für Gehäuse, den Maßnahmen der Regierenden gegenüber. Genau das ist es, ein Sklavensymbol, ein Unterwerfungssymbol. Es geht aber noch weiter. Chronologie eines Verbrechens, frei geklagtes RKI Protokoll, Lockdown schlimmer als Covid selbst. Steigende Kindersterblichkeit wurde erwartet. Hat man bewusst den Tod von Kindern in Kauf genommen, Fragezeichen? Komplettes Dokument als PDF vier. Ich mach ja alle Seiten, die wir hier aufschlagen, die verweise, die stell ich ja noch unten in die Beschreibung, wer immer. Indirekte negative Effekte, Protokoll des Covid neunzehn Krisenstabs. Also es ist jetzt keine interne internes Memo oder so, das ist ein Protokoll des ganzen gesamten Krisenstabs. Indirekte negative Effekte des Lockdowns durch Lücken bei der Behandlung von Tuberkulose, Aussetzung von Routine Impfprogrammen, also einem da schon mal deswegen der die Effekte des Lockdowns auf andere Patienten mit anderen Krankheiten, auch Krebsvorsorge und viele andere Behandlungen sind ja dann aufgeschoben worden oder haben einfach nicht stattgefunden, weil Covid, Covid, Covid, Aussetzung von Routine, Impfprogrammen, steigende Kindersterblichkeit zu erwarten. Konsequenzen des Lockdowns haben zum Teil schwerere Konsequenzen als Covid selbst. Also die Kindersterblichkeit bezieht sich nicht auf Covid, ja. Das wär ja auch wirklich mehr als lächerlich, wobei das haben Sie auch probiert. Nein, die steigende Kindersterblichkeit ist zu erwarten aufgrund der Lockdown Maßnahmen. Nur mal so, ja. So, die nächste Coronalüge ist geplatzt. Die Lockdowns basierten nach den jetzt veröffentlichten Protokollen des Robert Koch Instituts nicht auf fachlichen Einschätzungen, nicht auf anfängliche Unsicherheit, sondern allein auf politische Anweisung. Einer Person, die in den Protokollen geschwärzt ist, die nächste Klage nun gegen die Schwärzung läuft, also auch, dass das aufgedeckt wird, weil es gibt einen wird eine Person erwähnt, die aber nicht hier sichtbar ist, es geschwärzt die Stelle, die außerhalb des RKIs die politische Anweisung gegeben hat, wir ziehen hier weiter durch. Die nächste Klage, nun gegen die Schwärzung, läuft. Spahn oder direkt Merkel ein Krimi? Die Frage, ob's vielleicht direkt auch Merkel war. Und hier haben wir noch mal Multiplarmagazin, wie sich das ZDF hier versucht, langsam rauszureden beziehungsweise noch mal korrigiert innerhalb von eins, zwei Tagen. Auch der Spiegel hat hier das Onlinemagazin Multiplator auf diesen Schritt geklagt hat, der veröffentlicht er die Unterlagen. Die Frage ist an den Spiegel, warum habt ihr das nicht gemacht? Aber was macht der Spiegel nach der heimlichen Überarbeitung? Das rechte Onlinemagazin multipolar, das auf diesen Schritt geklagt hat, der veröffentlicht die Unterlagen, da wird mit dem mal schön gefranet und gehetzt und unter anderem wird dann noch dem und Multipolar dann auch noch dem Magazin Folgendes unterstellt. Multipolar wird unter anderem vom Autor Paul Schreier herausgegeben, der Bücher mit Verschwörungserzählungen zu den Anschlägen vom elften September veröffentlicht hat und mehr Verständnis für die Politik Russlands eingefordert hat, wie kann er nur, ja? Ah ja, Belaskis hat das hier auch schön aufgearbeitet, wie das ZDF hier rumeiert. Offenbar scheint's da keine wirkliche Sprachregelung zu geben. Die ARD hat meines Wissen noch gar nicht reagiert. BILD hat jetzt auch das groß aufgemacht. Spiegel, es mussten sie jetzt, ja, aufgrund von x, übrigens Twitter, ja, wo das schon seit Tagen die Runde macht und trendet in den Hashtag Trends am gefeierten ZDF Artikel, weil der zuerst nämlich 'n bisschen gefeiert wurde, dass die jetzt hier wirklich mal sowas wie 'n bisschen Klartext sprechen, ja. Am gefeierten ZDF Artikel wird bereits an entscheidenden Stellen herumeditiert, Fragezeichen kommen hinzu, sowie ein neuer beschwichtigender Einschub, die Einschätzung zur Hochstufen und der Risikobewertung sei doch aus dem RKI d e gekommen, also nicht diese ominöse Figur von außerhalb die Anweisungen gegeben haben. Dies ist schlichtweg falsch, wie Kanzlei Raue dem Pfleger multipolar selbst mitteilte, gibt es zum Hintergrund der Hochstufung der Risikobewertung keine RKI eigenen weiteren Dokumente mehr. Der Kanzler Rauhe ist der Vertreter des RKI. Die einschätzen kann, kam eben nicht aus dem RKI, sondern es gab nur den Befehl des externen geschwärzten Akteurs. Diese Info hätte den Mainstream wohl nie erreichen dürfen, jetzt wird heimlich herumeditiert. Hier steht am dreiundzwanzigsten März die Verschärfung der Risikobewertungen von mäßig auf hoch. Darum ging's ja, ja. Das ist ja das, wo dann auch die viel strengeren Maßnahmen dann dadurch entstanden sind. Von sämtlicher Lockdown Maßnahmen und Gerichtsurteile gründete, anders als bislang geglaubt, nicht auf einer fachlichen Einschätzung des RKI, sondern auf der politischen Anweisung eines externen Akteurs. Herr, wer ist 'n das bitte? Haben wir einen heimlichen König oder was oder sogar 'n Reichskanzler, der das entscheidet. Der stand vor zwei Tagen noch bei beim ZDF und dann stand dann stattdessen wurde das gestrichen, was ich gerade vorgelesen hab. Multiplar sieht aus dieser Schwärzung den Schluss, dass nicht das RKI die Risikobewertung gemacht habe, sondern eine externe Person und diese Passage in den Protokollen liegt allerdings, liegt allerdings nahe, dass die, dass das RKI die Risikobewertung selbst gemacht und nach dieser das Risiko als hoch eingestuft hat, einzig die Veröffentlichung der Risikobewertung hing demnach von der Freigabe der nicht namentlich genannten Person ab. Also nicht, dass die Person das Angewiesen hat, sondern wann das veröffentlicht werden soll oder freigegeben werden soll. Glaubwürdig geht anders. Und wir haben hier dem zwar ohne ein Wort zu den RKI Pfalz, aber dennoch recht selbstkritisch, es fängt an, ja, wir lassen das mal laufen. Speaker 1: Wer einen Fehler gemacht hat und ihn nicht korrigiert, begeht einen zweiten. Man muss nicht konfuzius sein, die Wahrheit in dem Spruch zu erkennen. Gilt auch für das, was jetzt genau vier Jahre her ist und an das viele am liebsten nicht mehr erinnert werden wollen. Für andere ist das Erlebte dagegen immer noch sehr präsent. Man kann sich's heute kaum noch vorstellen, der erste Corona Lockdown in Deutschland. Das hieß, plötzlich waren die Innenstädte leer. Schulen, Kitas, Restaurants, Friseure, alles dicht. Ab sofort dürfen sich nur noch zwei Personen treffen, wenn sie nicht in einem Haushalt sind, auch draußen. Speaker 2: Ehrlich. Speaker 0: Es ist die Zeit, Speaker 1: in der das Klima rauer wird. Speaker 0: Wo wo 'n Ehepaar nicht zusammen spazieren gehen durfte, aber abends sich gemeinsam mit ins Ehebett legen durften. Wird, in Speaker 1: der Risse entstehen in der Gesellschaft, die es bis heute gibt. Speaker 0: Risse? Wenn in deinem Kopf Speaker 1: Sich alle wiederholt korrigieren müssen. Die Wissenschaft, die Politik. Speaker 0: Wiederholt korrigieren. Ihr ihr ihr Da müsste der alles zurücknehmen, was er gesagt hat. Alle würden sagen, hey Leute, nehmt das, was wir gesagt haben und setzt es einfach ins Gegenteil, dann ist Speaker 2: es richtig. Wir in den Medien. Was haben wir gelernt? Speaker 1: Was müssten wir lernen? Speaker 0: Einer, was haben wir gelernt und was müssten wir lernen und wir lernen doch alle irgendwie Bullshit, ja? Alles Bullshit, liebe Zuschauer. Für mich, es es mag es mag jetzt nicht schlecht klingen und es ist besser als nichts, ja, aber ich vermeine, ich meine da zu merken, dass man jetzt versucht, hey, wir müssen 'n bisschen eine Wahrheit aufn Tisch packen, sonst wird's zu hart. Und mal schauen, welcher Kopf hier rollt, weil es werden Köpfe rollen, es werden Bauern geopfert werden, das ganz sicher. Aber in dem Umfang nur, dass es hier nicht alle trifft, auf gar keinen Fall, ja. Aber es gibt hier bestimmt, da bin ich mir ziemlich sicher, auch die einen oder anderen, die hier geopfert werden. Speaker 1: Heike Slansky zeigt, wie es die politische Aufarbeitung steht. Speaker 3: Es war eine düstere Zeit. Lockdown, Kontaktbeschränkungen, Ausgangssperren, noch nie dagewesene Grundrechtseingriffe, die Bevölkerung vor einem Speaker 0: Ein Gott, das ist Speaker 2: ein guter Speaker 4: Stuttgart gesperrt zu schützen. Speaker 0: Im Freien steht. Speaker 3: Gleich zu Beginn der Pandemie der verantwortliche Gesundheitsminister mit einer merkwürdigen Prophezeiung. Speaker 0: Das im Auch damals, zweiundzwanzigster Vierte bereits, ja. Also zwei Monate, nicht mal, einen Monat nach Beginn des Lockdowns. Miteinander wahrscheinlich viel werden verzeihen müssen, ne. Also damals hab ich mir gedacht, als er das gesagt hat, der Spahn, der, das war vielleicht so wirklich so'n kurzer, wahrer Moment bei ihm, wo ihm das irgendwie mehr bewusst wurde, dass das eine ganz schöne heiße Kiste ist, die er da fährt, ja, und dass da ein paar Leute vielleicht und ein paar Leute zu viel für ihn auch, langsam sauer werden. Also mir wird bei der Diskussion so, so Spahn und Merkel hier ein bisschen vergessen, ja, und nur so schwerpunktmäßig auf Lauterbach, Wieler, RKI, von mir aus auch noch Scholz, sodass so die Grünen, die natürlich auch vehement hier mit all ganz schlechtem Beispielen vorbei vorangegangen sind und wie wie wirklich faschistisch hier alle Maßnahmen und Impfpflicht und so weiter gefordert haben, brutalst, ja? Die Grünen brutalst, Menschen, Feinde, par excellence Speaker 2: am Monaten. Speaker 3: Aus Monaten werden Jahre. Politik und Medien starren auf die Inzidenzen. Erst fünfunddreißig, dann fünfzig, irgendwann über tausend. Die Stunde der Exekut Auch Speaker 0: mal, wenn ich will's noch mal sehen. Speaker 3: Die Konferenzen, die Parlamente außen vor. Jetzt fordert die FDP eine Enquete Kommissionszwecks Aufarbeitung. SPD und Grüne sind dagegen. Natürlich. Speaker 0: Hier, er hier, ja, Damen, der ist übrigens auch ganz schön komischen Körperformen angenommen, wirklich ein ein schlechter Mensch. In meinen Augen einfach nur ein schlechter, bösartiger Mensch. Speaker 4: Ich glaube, jetzt ist nicht die Zeit für Theorie, sondern jetzt ist für die Zeit von Praxis. Wir sind mittendrin in der Legislatur Ach so, Speaker 0: ach, das ist so ein Widerliegen. Während des Lockdowns, da war die Zeit nie für Praxis, da war es Speaker 1: für Theorie. Echt, von Speaker 4: Regierungshandeln erwartet wird, dass wir nun Dinge, die nicht gut gelaufen sind, ändern und in Gesetze packen, die uns zukünftig Die Speaker 0: Fresse nicht nicht in groß antun. Das geht einfach nicht. Ich muss auch an meinen Zuschauer denken, ja, wirklich. Speaker 4: Sa vorbereitet lassen. Es fand Stigmatisierung statt. Das war nicht richtig, den Menschen zu stigmatisieren, egal ob man da Speaker 0: Also Andrew Andrew Ullmann, ja, fängt hier an, aber wirklich ganz blöd zurückzurudern. Der hat Leute blockiert, die auch nur im Mähe kurz gesagt haben auf Twitter gegen die Impfpflicht oder gegen die Maßnahmen. Es ist wirklich hammerhart, wie Sie jetzt glauben, sich einfach mal neu zu positionieren und Speaker 2: dann wird Speaker 0: schon alles gut Die da war da alle d'accord, ja, dass alle Leute, so wie ich und viele andere, die hier durchaus Fragen gestellt haben und sich gesagt haben, Moment mal, also irgendwie fühlt sich das alles 'n bisschen irre, son bisschen wahnsinnig an und wenig oder bis gar nicht logisch, ja, das war dann irgendwie damals nicht so erwünscht. Speaker 4: Ob man der gleiche Meinung ist oder der andere Meinung ist, geht gar nicht. Und hier müssen wir natürlich auch schauen, ob die Maßnahmen, die da getroffen worden sind, wirklich so gut waren. Speaker 0: Der Hier müssen wir schauen, ja. Ich hab's gewusst, dass genau dieses rumgeeiere kommt Speaker 3: Instrumentenkasten wuchs im Laufe der Pandemie. Maskentests zwei G, drei G, Hygienekonzepte und das Impfen. Alles zum Schutz der vulnerablen Gruppe. Wer nicht mitmacht, wird ausgegrenzt. Speaker 2: Impfungen sind halt mehr oder weniger Nebenwirkungen. Speaker 0: Was soll denn mehr oder weniger? Da fängt es doch schon an, wenn Sie's sagen, wer mir das erzählt, ist hochgradig unseriös, ja? Da brauche ich nicht mehr, da brauche ich nichts von Lauterbach wissen. Mehr oder weniger? Speaker 2: Wirkungsfrei. Speaker 5: Es handelt sich eine Pandemie Speaker 2: Mehr oder weniger nebenwirkungsfrei. Das Speaker 0: erzählt dir. Das hat der erzählt. Wann war das? Zweiundzwanzig, noch nicht so lange her, vor zwei Jahren. Speaker 5: Es handelt sich eine Pandemie der Ungeimpfte, meine Damen und Herren. Speaker 0: Von von 'nem alternativen Kanal kommen, ja. Und am Ende dieses Winters geimpft, genesen oder gestorben sein. Ja, schön. Seit zwei Jahren laufe ich hier als Zombie durch die Gegend. Speaker 3: Angstszenarien. Zwei Jahre nach Beginn der Pandemie stimmt die Ampel über eine Impfpflicht ab, als bereits rund achtzig Prozent mehrfach geimpft sind und scheitern. Speaker 6: Bei dem Impfen ist der Fehler passiert, dass zu große Hoffnungen geweckt wurden, nämlich dass der Impfstoff die Pandemie beenden wurde. Zum Zeitpunkt der Abstimmung über die Impfpflicht im Bundestag war es bereits bekannt aus Israel, dass der Schutz vor schwerer Erkrankungen sehr gut und auch sehr lang andauernd ist, während der Schutz vor Ansteckung nur kurz und vorübergehend ist. Speaker 0: Da seht ihr noch mal den totalen Dreck, ja? Der Schutz vor vor schwerer Erkrankung, ja, am Arsch die Waldfee. Speaker 3: Zweifel wachsen in der Bevölkerung Alfa, Delta, Omikron. Speaker 0: Wahnsinn, noch mal kurz überlegt, was die uns alles reinhämmern wollten. Alfa, Beta, Omikron, was gab's noch? Irgendwelche anderen bösartigsten Killervarianten und jetzt ist es ganz oft Das Speaker 3: Virus mutiert, eine Welle folgt der anderen. Aufgebrachte Bürger Speaker 0: Nee, eben nicht. Eben nicht. Die erzählt schon wieder was von Welle. Sie versuchen echt, die ganze Geschichte noch einigermaßen zu halten. Ich verachte euch echt für alles. Wir vergessen nicht wirklich. Welle, die redet von Wellen, es gab gar keine Wellen. Speaker 3: Coronaleugner, Impfskeptiker, sogenannte Spaziergänger stigmatisiert von Verantwortlichen. Speaker 2: Meine Damen und Herren, der Spaziergang hat seine Unschuld verloren. Speaker 0: Also meine Damen und Herren, der der Spaziergang hat seine Unschuld verloren. Müsste verhaftet werden. Bin ich wirklich, stehe ich dazu dieser Aussage? Meiner Ansicht nach müssten die alle verhaftet werden. Speaker 7: Denke, dass wir Speaker 0: Und das hier ist Professor Frauke Rostalski, die denkt 'n bisschen, Rechtsphilosophin in Düsseldorf. Der Speaker 2: Spaziergang hat seine Unschuld verloren. Speaker 7: Ich denke, dass wir durch die Coronapandemie Nicole. Eine erhebliche Spaltung in unserer Gesellschaft erfahren haben und dass die bis heute fortdauerte. Und es geht nicht darum, eine Entschuldigung zu verlangen, weil man im Nachhinein doch recht haben möchte. Speaker 0: Doch, darum zum Beispiel, es werden ein Teil, ja. Es entscheidest Du, Frauke, was worum's bei mir jetzt geht oder worum's für mich jetzt geht, ja. Das ist so übergriffig, so unverschämt, ja, was die Alte da raushaut, ja, es ist wirklich unglaublich. Speaker 7: Oder weil man nachtreten möchte oder Ähnliches, sondern es geht darum, ein Signal an diese Teile der Bevölkerung zu senden, ein Signal des Verständnisses und des Aufeinanderzugehens. Nee, vielen Dank. Nee, danke. Speaker 3: Drei Jahre Pandemie, keine politische Aufarbeitung. Corona hat Speaker 4: Ich muss da noch mal Speaker 0: drauf eingehen, aufeinander zugehen. Ich geh nicht auf Leute zu, die mich umbringen wollten, die mir schwerste gesundheitliche Schäden verursachen wollten und die mir auch Stress gemacht haben ohne Ende durch ihre Maßnahmen, ja? Da gehe ich und offensichtlich wussten sie, dass das alles sinnlos ist und nichts bringt, keine Maske, die Impfung, dass die Maßnahmen mehr negative Folgen haben als Covid selbst, Lockdown und so weiter. Ihr wusstet es und auf solche Leute, auf euch, soll ich zugehen? Ganz sicher nicht. Ja, das war das Gleiche noch mal. Wo sind jetzt diese vom umstrittenen Medienkonzern ÖER geheilten Coronaerklärer? Lesch, Mai Thai, Hirschhausen, nur einige zu nennen und die geschehensbegleiteten Lachmuskelfreunde Böhmi, Welke, Uthoff, wer ist 'n Uthoff? Keine Ahnung. Und die Hürde an Impf Promis, die ihr aufgefahren habt. Hier den Arm, ja, hier die Hayali, der der Jauch, Peter Maffay, was weiß ich und die lustigen Tagesthemenkommentatoren mit schönen Dank auch ihr Ungeimpften, Montgomery Tyrannei der Ungeimpften, Söder haben wir gerade gehört, Pandemie der Ungeimpften und vier Jahre nach der Spalte der Gesellschaft durch Impfterror, Hetze und Diskriminierung drehen Politiker wie Armin Speaker 2: Und Speaker 8: Und das ist die Spaltung der Gesellschaft, denn die Frage ist, wie haben wir damals diskutiert? Wie sind wir mit anderen Meinungen umgegangen? Das ist bis heute fortgesetzt Speaker 1: Corona ist einundzwanzig schon. Speaker 8: Und das ist die Spaltung der Gesellschaft, denn die Frage ist, wie haben wir damals diskutiert, wie sind wir mit anderen Meinungen umgegangen? Das ist bis heute fortgesetzt, immer noch ein Feuer für Populisten gegen den Staat Stimmung zu machen. Ich glaube, hier müssen wir selbstkritisch sagen, wir hätten facettenreicher die wissenschaftliche Expertise nutzen müssen. Wir hätten unterschiedliche Meinungen, neue Dialogkultur, die Speaker 0: hätte, hätte Fahrradkette, halt am Mund, ehrlich. Armin Laschet, CDUCSU, Ministerpräsident a d, siebter vierter zweiundzwanzig, Impfpflicht gegen SARS Covid mit ja gestimmt, ja. Keine weiteren Fragen, euer Ehren, ja. Sei einfach still, ja. Schweig für immer, wirklich. Obwohl Georg Ressle halt Twitter blockiert hat, bekam ich dieses sehen. Er hat eine zentrale Aufgabe als Journalist entdeckt zu differenzieren. Achtung, vierundzwanziger, zwanzigster August zweitausendzwanzig, NPD, dritter W, Kompakt, IB, AfD, Rechtsextremisten mobilisieren massiv für die Berliner Corona Demonstration B neunundzwanzig null acht. Es war der August, die große Wer mit diesen Leuten gemeinsam demonstriert, weiß, was er tut und mit wem, Achtung und jetzt am fünfundzwanzigsten März heute. Und noch mal, nicht jeder, der überbordende Coronamaßnahmen kritisiert hat, ist ein Schwurbler oder Rechtsextremer, auch wenn viele damit ihre braune Suppe gekocht haben, auch das gehört zum Job, dass wir differenzieren. Es steht für sich selber, liebe Zuschauer, entscheidet bitte selber, hier seht das, Wer mit diesen Leuten gemeinsam demonstriert, weiß was er tut und mit wem, ja? Aber und zum Job gehört auch, dass wir differenzieren die sind so fertig, ehrlich. Und die Punkband Punk, ich lach mir immer, ich lach immer noch, die Ärzte stand während dieser Pandemie, symptomatisch für die echte Ärzteschaft, charakterlos, eierlos, ehrlos, hirnlos, aufschneiderisch, für Geld jedes Ethos über Bord geworfen, Pseudo Antifa. So schaut's aus. Eine Rückkerze, Mobilität funktioniert nur über Impfungen, sagen die Ärzte. Und noch mal, am Anfang des Videos hab ich's gefragt, wieso muss eigentlich multipolar das kleine, vergleichsweise kleine Magazin, die RKI Files freiklagen? Das war auch recht teuer. Anwaltskosten, hat denen kein einziges hat denen kein einziges großes Medienhaus Interesse an dem Thema. Wieso eigentlich nicht FAZ, SZ, DER SPIEGEL, Focus online, stern d e, die ZEIT und Co. Euer Schweigen ist extrem laut. Eingeweihte Mittäter oder was? Ja klar. Das als Resümee noch zum Schluss. Natürlich ohne die Medien wäre das nicht gegangen, wenn es ein oder zwei investigative Medien oder Magazine gegeben hätte, die gesagt hätten, Moment mal, ja, ihr haut einiges nicht hin, dann wär das Narrativ zusammengekracht, aber das ist nicht passiert. Sie waren eingeweiht, sie haben mitgemacht und haben alles gewusst und trotzdem alles verteidigt und gefördert, was die Regierung gemacht hat. Keine einzige Maßnahme, wirklich mal scharf kritisiert oder wirklich hier Klartext geschrieben, gesprochen, gesendet, nichts, nichts, und so weiter und so fort. Ihr seid solche billigen echt verlotten, ihr seid billiges, billigste Hunde, ja. Und jetzt versucht ihr hier oft ganz billig herauszukommen, ja. Also wir machen weiter, wir vergessen nicht, ja. Und ich kann nur sagen, so nicht, ja, Laschet und und und hier die Rechtsphilosophin, ja, aufeinander zugehen und sich, genau das haben wir gesagt, wird kommen und was passiert? Es kommt, ja? Mal schauen, wie die deutsche Öffentlichkeit damit umgeht, wie die das in der Erinnerung, wie die das empfinden. Immerhin ist es ja jetzt auch schon im Mainstream und erreicht auch die, die sonst gar nix lesen und mal schauen, wie auch die Opfer der Game Plörre hier vielleicht dann noch mal neuen Motivationsschub bekommen, hier dagegen vorzugehen, weil noch mal das Ganze verjährt auch übrigens, ja? Also da sollte man, ich glaub, der Einix der Zwölfte ist ein dieses Jahr, diesen Jahres ist, glaube ich, son Datum, wo dann etliche Ansprüche verjähren, wenn man bis dahin keine Ansprüche gestellt hat. Ich sag's nur bitte bitte erkundigen, wen das betrifft, ja. Es bleibt also nicht ewig bestehen, da eine Möglichkeit, sich da rechtlich da oder über 'n Klageweg da Recht zu verschaffen, ja. So, ja, also in diesem Sinne, liebe Leute, ja, immerhin, ich will jetzt nicht alle schlecht reden, aber das ist natürlich schon ein ein harter Witz hier, ja. Die die geschwärzten Protokolle hier, das ist Speaker 2: ja, wirklich sensationell, muss Speaker 0: man schon fast sagen, sind, dass man ja, wirklich sensationell, muss man schon fast sagen, sind, dass man echt hier zumindest sagen kann, okay, also es ist jetzt nicht, es wird jetzt nicht mit allem aller Macht hier der Deckel drauf gehalten, aber wenn Noch mal 'n Glückwunsch am Multipolarmagazin, das habt ihr toll gemacht und in diesem Sinne an alle anderen, vor allem viel größeren Medien, ihr habt es nicht toll gemacht, aber das ist ja nichts Neues. Ja. Speaker 2: Abonnieren, Speaker 0: liken, teilen, kommentieren und wenn ihr uns finanziell unterstützen wollt, gerne auf Kofi Bitcoin Stripde und deutscher Bankverbindung. Macht das gut, ihr Lieben. Servus, danke, das rutscht dir einfach weiter so durch. Super.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

a quick and dirty subbed clip of the above - no edits. pardon the errors.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the release of unredacted protocols from the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) regarding COVID-19 measures. The speaker criticizes mainstream media for not covering this issue and praises the Multipolar Magazine for their efforts. The speaker highlights key points from the protocols, such as the lack of evidence for FFP2 masks and the negative effects of lockdown measures. They also criticize politicians and media figures for their handling of the pandemic and the division it has caused in society. The speaker concludes by urging viewers to take legal action against those responsible.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Grüße euch, liebe Zuschauer. Servus. Ja, nicht der Spiegel, nicht der Stern, nicht die Zeit, nicht die Süddeutsche, nicht die FAZ, auch nicht ZDF, ARD, RTL, ProSieben oder sonstige große oder auch kleine Konzernen und sonstige Medien haben die RKI Protokolle frei geklagt, beziehungsweise zumindest erst mal es geschafft, dass 'n Teil, wir werden's gleich sehen, ungeschwärzt veröffentlicht wird. Das ist das Multiplar Magazin, hier herausgegeben von Stefan Korinth und Paul Schreier. Hier RKI Protokolle, ZDF und Spiegel verfälscht nachträglich Ihre Berichte. Da kommen wir noch dazu. Ich möchte jetzt erst mal nur dem Multiplarmagazin hier den Raum geben, den es sich verdient hat. Ohne die wär es vielleicht gar nicht dazu gekommen, dass wir überhaupt irgendwie mal anfangen, hier eine wie auch immer geartete Aufarbeitung der Coronavorgänge, der Maßnahmen beschließen beschließen Beschlüsse und auch der Art und Weise, wie diese Beschlüsse zustande gekommen sind, ja. Da werden wir jetzt 'n bisschen mehr haben wir oder haben wir jetzt 'n bisschen mehr erfahren. Wir schauen mal rein. Hier, das meint der Epstein Liste der Account sechzig Sekunden RKI Files, darunter läuft es beziehungsweise Hashtag RKI Protokolle müssten doch helfen, im Aufwachprozess ein kleines Stückchen weiterzukommen. Sie haben uns verarscht, Sie verarschen uns immer noch. Ja, nur mal hier, das sind die geschwärzten oder zumindest teilweise geschwärzten Protokolle. Da fragt man sich teilweise schon bei manchen Seiten, warum geben Sie denn die Seite raus? Also ich hab Seiten gesehen, die sind vollkommen schwarz, ja, vollkommen geschwärzt hier, aber sie konnten ja nicht alle schwärzen, weil sonst braucht man es ja gar nicht machen, dann wär das ja die totale vor für alle Welt offensichtliche Farce und das, was nicht geschwärzt, ist, schon interessant genug, ja. Also damit die nicht wissen, was da da steht, wo es geschwärzt ist, weil wenn Sie das stehen lassen mussten, das ist ja schon einiges, ja. Also wir laufen hier jetzt mal eine Minute durch mit dem Video. Hier zum Beispiel war es glaube ich, ja. Moment. Ja hier. Also ich mein, sone Seite, hoher Arbeitsaufwand, dass im Lagecenter Erweiterung Personen personell in Arbeit. Also das ist das Einzige, was wir da stehen lassen, ansonsten nur geschwärzt, ja. Es ist relativ wirklich eine Zeige oder nicht Zeige, sondern Mittelfinger Aktion vom RKI, sage ich mal, Robert Koch Institut, die das hier veröffentlicht haben oder auf Zwang, ja, raus auf Klage, das Gericht hat entschieden, sie müssen das veröffentlichen, aber eben hier seht das ja, ja, in welcher Form. Das bleibt dann dem RKI überlassen. Warum sind in den RKI Files, RKI Protokollen Stellen geschwärzt, wenn doch Hunderttausende Leben heldenhaft gerettet wurden? Warum sind die Verantwortlichen der Coronapolitik nicht stolz auf ihre grandiose Leistung, Herr Polens zum Beispiel, aber auch viele andere. Ich meine, ja, Leben retten, Helden des Alltags, stay home, schützt deine Großeltern, schützt deine Kinder, wir machen es wegen der Kinder, wir machen es wegen der vulnerablen Gruppen, wir machen's wegen der Schwachen und Kranken, wir sind haben die richtigen Entscheidungen getroffen, wir sind die besten, ja. Das kommt jetzt irgendwie grad 'n bisschen wenig bis gar nicht. Also das ist wirklich wichtig. RKI falls dreißigster Zehnter zweitausendzwanzig laut diesem Protokoll, RKI bestätigt, dass es keine Evidenz für FFP2 Masken jemals gab. Die BAAN zum Beispiel fragt er hier, was sagt denn ihr dazu, die monatelang in mit der FFP2 Pflicht eure Kunden drangsaliert habt? Also was gibt es für Entschädigungen wie in der Nötigung? Es geht insgesamt diese Maskenpflicht, die ich Gott sei Dank, wie soll ich sagen, nicht mitgemacht hab einfach, ja. Einschränkungen sind im und dokumentklar dargestellt und es gibt keine Evidenz, also keinen Beweis für die Nutzung von FFP2 Masken außerhalb des Arbeitsschutzes. Dies könnte auch für die Öffentlichkeit zugänglich gemacht werden, ja, nur mal so. Und hier RKI falls, das RKI sagt, wichtiger, offener Punkt, Enhanced Desease. Da geht's darum, wichtiger, offener Punkt, Enhanced Desease. Dies bedeutet, dass bei Impfdurchbrüchen stärkere Erkrankung auftritt als bei Ungeimpften. Komisch, dass wir das alles schon erzählt haben, wir Schwurbler, wir Schwartzeher und wir Nazis und wir Quertreiber und Querdenker. Hier haben wir, muss mal schauen, ich bleib hier irgendwo. Ja, hier sind wir, alles klar. Stephan Auß, das muss man mal sagen, der Herausgräber der Welt, auch wenn die Welt eine eine eine wirklich schlimme Geschichte ist, aber hier muss man das auch mal bemerken. Keine Evidenz, was wir jetzt gerade gesehen haben und bisherige Studien zur Wirksamkeit von FFP2 Masken sind daran gescheitert, dass Masken nicht oder nicht korrekt getragen wurden. Ihr Nutzen sollte auf Arbeitsschutz von Personen, die mit Infektionen und Patienten arbeiten, begrenzt bleiben und Stefan Aust hat hier schon damals zweitausendzwanzig geschrieben, die Maske muss der Maske wegen getragen werden als Symbol für Gehorsam den Maßnahmen der Regierenden gegenüber. Genau das ist es, ein Sklavensymbol, ein Unterwerfungssymbol. Es geht aber noch weiter. Chronologie eines Verbrechens, frei geklagtes RKI Protokoll, Lockdown schlimmer als Covid selbst. Steigende Kindersterblichkeit wurde erwartet. Man bewusst den Tod von Kindern in Kauf genommen, Fragezeichen? Komplettes Dokument als PDF hier. Ich mach ja alle Seiten, die wir hier aufschlagen, die verweise, die stelle ich ja noch unten in die Beschreibung, wer immer. Indirekte negative Effekte, Protokoll des Covid neunzehn Krisen Also, das ist jetzt keine interne, internes Memo oder so, das ist ein Protokoll des ganzen gesamten Krisenstabs. Indirekte negative Effekte des Lockdowns durch Lücken bei der Behandlung von Tuberkulose, Aussetzung von Routine Impfprogrammen, also einem da schon mal deswegen der die Effekte des Lockdowns auf andere Patienten mit anderen Krankheiten, auch Krebsvorsorge und viele andere Behandlungen sind ja dann aufgeschoben worden oder haben einfach nicht stattgefunden, weil Covid, Covid, Aussetzung von Routine, Impfprogrammen, steigende Kindersterblichkeit zu erwarten. Konsequenzen des Lockdowns haben zum Teil schwerere Konsequenzen als Covid selbst. Also die Kindersterblichkeit bezieht sich nicht auf Covid, ja. Das wär ja auch wirklich mehr als lächerlich, wobei das haben Sie auch probiert. Nein, die steigende Kindersterblichkeit ist zu erwarten aufgrund der Lockdown Maßnahmen. Nur mal so, ja. So, die nächste Coronalüge ist geplatzt. Die Lockdowns passierten nach den jetzt veröffentlichten Protokollen des Robert Koch Instituts nicht auf fachlichen Einschätzungen, nicht auf anfängliche Unsicherheit, sondern allein auf politische Anweisung. Einer Person, die in den Protokollen geschwärzt ist, die nächste Klage nun gegen Geschwärzung läuft. Also auch, dass das aufgedeckt wird, weil es gibt eine, wird eine Person erwähnt, die aber nicht hier sichtbar ist, es geschwärzt die Stelle, die außerhalb des RKI die politische Anweisung gegeben hat, wir ziehen hier weiter durch. Die nächste Klage nun gegen die Schwärzung läuft, Spahn oder direkt Merkel ein Krimi? Die Frage, ob's vielleicht direkt auch Merkel war, Speaker 1: 'n Speaker 0: Multiplarmagazin, wie sich das ZDF hier versucht, langsam rauszureden beziehungsweise sich noch mal korrigiert innerhalb von ein, zwei Tagen. Auch der Spiegel hat hier das Onlinematacy multipolator auf diesen Schritt geklagt hat, der veröffentlicht das auf diesen Schritt geklagt hat, der veröffentlicht die Unterlagen. Da wird mit der Maya schön geframt und gehetzt und unter anderem wird dann noch dem und multipolar dann auch noch die Magazin folgendes unterstellt. Multipolar wird unter anderem vom Autor Paul Schreier herausgegeben, der Bücher mit Verschwörungserzählungen zu den Anschlägen vom elften September veröffentlicht hat und mehr Verständnis für die Politik Russlands eingefordert hat, wie kann er nur, ja? Ah ja, Velasquez hat das hier auch schön aufgearbeitet, wie das ZDF hier rumeiert. Offenbar scheint's da keine wirkliche Sprachregelung zu geben. Die ARD hat meines Wissen noch gar nicht reagiert. BILD hat jetzt auch das groß aufgemacht. Spiegel, es mussten sie jetzt, ja, auch aufgrund von x, übrigens Twitter, ja, wo das schon seit Tagen die Runde macht und trendet in den Hashtag Trends am gefeierten ZDF Artikel, bei der zuerst nämlich 'n bisschen gefeiert wurde, dass die jetzt hier wirklich mal sowas wie 'n bisschen Klartext sprechen, ja. Am gefeierten ZDF Artikel wird bereits an entscheidenden Stellen herumeditiert, Fragezeichen kommen hinzu, so wie ein neuer beschwichtigender Einschub. Die Einschätzung zur Hochstufen der Risikobewertung sei doch aus dem RKI d e gekommen, also nicht diese ominöse schlichtweg falsch. Wie Kanzlei Raue dem Kläger multipolar selbst mitteile mitteilte, gibt es zum Hintergrund der Hochstufung der Risikobewertung keine RKI eigenen weiteren Dokumente mehr. Der Kanzlei Rauhe ist der Vertreter des RKI. Die Einschätzung kann kam eben nicht aus dem RKI, sondern es gab nur den Befehl des externen geschwärzten Akteurs. Diese Info hätte den Mainstream wohl nie erreichen dürfen, jetzt wird heimlich herum editiert. Hier steht am dreiundzwanzigsten März die Verschärfung der Risikobewertungen mäßig auf hoch. Darum ging's ja, ja. Das ist ja das, wo dann auch die viel strengeren Maßnahmen dann dadurch entstanden sind, von mäßig auf Hochgrundlage sämtlicher Lockdown Maßnahmen und Gerichtsurteile gründete, anders bislang geglaubt, nicht auf einer fachlichen Einschätzung des RKI, sondern auf der politischen Anweisung eines externen Akteurs. Ja, wer ist denn das bitte? Haben wir 'n eigentlich 'n König oder was oder sogar 'n Reichskanzler, der das entscheidet? Der stand vor zwei Tagen noch bei beim ZDF und dann stand dann stattdessen wurde das gestrichen, was ich grad vorgelesen hab. Multiplar zieht aus dieser Schärzung Schlärzung den Schluss, dass nicht das RKI die Risikobewertung gemacht habe, sondern eine externe Person und diese Passage in den Protokollen liegt allerdings nahe, dass die dass das RKI die Risikobewertung selbst gemacht und nach dieser das Risiko als hoch eingestuft hat, einzig die Veröffentlichung der Risikobewertung hin demnach von der Freigabe der nicht namentlich genannten Person ab. Also nicht, dass die Person das Angewiesene hat, sondern wann das veröffentlicht werden soll oder freigegeben werden soll, glaubwürdig geht anders. Und wir haben hier dem ohne ein Wort zu den RKI Falls aber dennoch recht selbstkritisch. Es fängt an, ja, wir lassen das mal laufen. Speaker 1: Wer einen Fehler gemacht hat und ihn nicht korrigiert, begeht einen zweiten. Man muss nicht konfuzius sein, die Wahrheit in dem Spruch zu erkennen. Gilt auch für das, was jetzt genau vier Jahre her ist und an das viele am liebsten nicht mehr erinnert werden wollen. Für andere ist das Erlebte dagegen immer noch sehr präsent. Man kann sich's heute kaum noch vorstellen, der erste Corona Lockdown in Deutschland. Das hieß, plötzlich waren die Innenstädte leer. Schulen, Kitas, Restaurants, Friseure, alles dicht. Ab sofort dürfen sich nur noch zwei Personen treffen, wenn sie nicht in einem Haushalt sind, auch draußen. Speaker 0: Leb mich am Arsch ehrlich gesagt. Speaker 1: Es ist die Zeit, in der das Klima rauer wird. Speaker 0: Wo wo 'n Ehepaar nicht zusammen spazieren gehen durfte, aber abends sich gemeinsam mit ins Ehebett legen durften Speaker 2: Wird Speaker 1: in der Risse entstehen in der Gesellschaft, die es bis heute gibt. Speaker 0: Risse? Wenn dein Kopf. Speaker 1: Sich alle wiederholt korrigieren müssen. Die Wissenschaft, die Politik. Speaker 0: Wiederholt korrigieren. Ihr ihr ihr das da müsste der alles zurücknehmen, was ihr gesagt habt. Alle würden sagen, hey Leute, nehmt das, was wir gesagt haben und setzt es einfach ins Gegenteil. Dann ist es richtig. Speaker 1: Wir in den Medien. Was haben wir gelernt? Was müssten wir lernen? Speaker 0: Ja, es ist schon ist schon windelweich, ja? Also da versucht einer, was haben wir gelernt und was müssten wir lernen und wir lernen doch alle irgendwie Bullshit, ja? Alles Bullshit, liebe Zuschauer. Für mich, es es mag es mag jetzt nicht schlecht klingen und es ist besser als nichts, ja? Aber ich vermeine, ich meine da zu merken, dass man jetzt versucht, hey, wir müssen 'n bisschen in Wahrheit aufn Tisch packen, sonst wird's zu hart. Und mal schauen, welcher Kopf hier rollt, weil es werden Köpfe rollen. Es werden Bauern geopfert werden, das ganz sicher. Aber in dem Umfang nur, dass es hier nicht alle trifft, auf gar keinen Fall, ja. Aber es gibt hier bestimmt, da bin ich mir ziemlich sicher, auch die einen oder anderen, die hier geopfert werden. Speaker 1: Heike Slansky zeigt, wie es die politische Aufarbeitung steht. Speaker 3: Es war eine düstere Zeit. Lockdown, Kontaktbeschränkungen, Ausgangssperren, noch nie dagewesene Grundrechtseingriffe, die Bevölkerung vor einem Nein, Speaker 0: Du hast gesperrt Auch damals, zweiundzwanzigster Vierte bereits, ja. Also zwei Monate, ja, nicht mal, einen Monat nach Beginn des Lockdowns. Speaker 2: Miteinander wahrscheinlich viel werden verzeihen müssen. Speaker 0: Also damals hab ich mir gedacht, als er das gesagt hat, der Spahn, der, das war vielleicht son wirklich son son kurzer wahrer Moment bei ihm, wo ihm das irgendwie mehr bewusst wurde, dass das eine ganz schöne heiße Kiste die er da fährt, ja? Und dass da ein paar Leute vielleicht und ein paar Leute zu viel für ihn auch langsam sauer werden. Also mir wird bei der Diskussion so, so Spahn und Merkel hier 'n bisschen vergessen, ja und nur so schwerpunktmäßig auf Lauterbach, Wieler, RKI, von mir aus auch noch Scholz, so das so und die Grünen, die natürlich auch vehement hier mit all ganz schlechten Beispiel vorbei vorangegangen sind und wie wie wirklich faschistisch hier alle Maßnahmen und Impfpflicht und so weiter gefordert haben, brutalst, ja? Die Grünen brutalst, Menschen, Feinde, par excellence Speaker 2: da Monaten. Speaker 3: Aus Monaten werden Jahre. Politik und Medien starren auf die Inzidenzen. Erst fünfunddreißig, dann fünfzig, irgendwann über Erst fünfunddreißig, dann fünfzig, irgendwann über tausend. Die Stunde der Exekut Ach, Speaker 0: mach ich das noch mal sehen. Speaker 3: Die Parlamente, die Parlamente außen vor. Jetzt fordert die FDP eine Enquete Kommission zwecks Aufarbeitung. SPD und Grüne sind dagegen. Speaker 0: Natürlich. Hier, er hier, ja, Damen. Der ist übrigens auch ganz schön komischen Körperformen angenommen. Wirklich ein ein schlechter Mensch. In meinen Augen einfach nur ein schlechter, bösartiger Mensch. Speaker 2: Ich glaube, jetzt ist nicht die Zeit für Theorie, sondern jetzt ist für die Zeit von Praxis. Wir sind mittendrin in der Legislatur Speaker 0: Ach so, ach das ist so ein Widerlegen. Während des Lockdowns, da war die Zeit nie für Praxis, da war es Speaker 2: für die Speaker 0: Theorie Echt, von Speaker 2: Regierungshandeln erwartet wird, dass wir nun Dinge, die nicht gut gelaufen sind, ändern und in Gesetze packen, die uns zukünftig beenden. Speaker 0: Die Fresse nicht nicht gegen Groß antun, das geht einfach nicht. Ich muss auch an meine Zuschauer denken, ja, wirklich. Speaker 2: Das hat vorbereitet lassen. Es Speaker 4: fand Stigmatisierung statt. Das war nicht richtig, denn Menschen zu stigmatisieren, egal ob man da Speaker 0: Also Andrew Andrew Ullmann, ja, fängt hier an, mal wirklich ganz bewusst zurückzurudern. Der hat Leute blockiert, die auch nur im Mähe kurz gesagt haben auf Twitter gegen die Impfpflicht oder gegen die Maßnahmen. Es ist wirklich hammerhart, wie Sie jetzt glauben, sich einfach mal neu zu positionieren und dann wird schon alles gut Speaker 4: Die Meinung ist oder andere Meinung ist, geht gar nicht und Speaker 0: Das geht gar nicht. Das war damals aber irgendwie, da war da alle d'accord, ja, dass alle Leute so wie ich und viele andere, die hier durchaus Fragen gestellt haben und sich gesagt haben, Moment mal, also irgendwie fühlt sich das alles 'n bisschen irre, son bisschen wahnsinnig an und wenig oder bis gar nicht logisch, ja. Das war dann irgendwie damals nicht so erwünscht. Speaker 4: Ob man der gleiche Meinung ist oder andere Meinung ist, geht gar nicht. Und hier müssen wir natürlich auch schauen, ob die Maßnahmen, die da getroffen worden sind, wirklich so gut waren. Speaker 0: Der Hier müssen wir schauen, ja. Ich hab's gewusst, dass genau dieses rumgeeiere kommt. Speaker 3: Instrumentenkasten wuchs im Laufe der Pandemie. Maskentests zwei g, drei g, Hygienekonzepte und das Image. Alles zum Schutz der vulnerablen Gruppe. Wer nicht mitmacht, wird ausgegrenzt. Speaker 4: Impfungen sind halt mehr oder weniger Nebenwirkungen. Speaker 0: Was soll denn mehr oder weniger? Da fängt es doch schon an, dass ich sag, wer mir das erzählt, ist hochgradig unseriös, ja? Da brauch ich nicht mehr, da brauch ich nichts von Lauterbach wissen. Mehr oder weniger? Speaker 4: Umfrei. Speaker 2: Es handelt sich eine Pandemie Speaker 4: mehr oder weniger nebenwirkungsfrei. Speaker 0: Das erzählt dir, weshalb er erzählt, wann war das? Zweiundzwanzig, noch nicht so lange her, vor zwei Jahren. Speaker 2: Es handelt sich eine Pandemie der Ungeimpften, meine Damen und Herren. Wahrscheinlich. Speaker 0: Also noch mal, das hat jetzt alles das ZDF hier zusammengeschnitten, ja? Könnte eigentlich aus zwanzig zwanzig oder einundzwanzig von von 'nem alternativen Kanal kommen, ja. Speaker 2: Am Ende dieses Winters geimpft, genesen oder gestorben sein. Speaker 0: Ja. Schön. Seit zwei Jahren laufe ich hier als Zombie durch die Gegend. Speaker 3: Angstszenarien. Zwei Jahre nach Beginn der Pandemie stimmt die Ampel über eine Impfpflicht ab, als bereits rund achtzig Prozent mehrfach geimpft sind und scheitern. Speaker 5: Bei dem Impfen ist der Fehler passiert, dass zu große Hoffnungen geweckt wurden, nämlich dass der Impfstoff die Pandemie beenden wurde. Zum Zeitpunkt der Abstimmung über die Impfpflicht im Bundestag war es bereits bekannt aus Israel, dass der Schutz vor schwerer Erkrankungen sehr gut und auch sehr lang andauernd ist, während der Schutz vor Ansteckung nur kurz und vorübergehend ist. Speaker 0: Seht ihr noch mal den totalen Dreck, ja? Der Schutz vor vor schwere Erkrankung, ja, am Arsch die Waldfee. Speaker 3: Zweifel wachsen in der Bevölkerung, Alpha, Beta, Delta, Omikron. Wahnsinn, Speaker 0: noch mal kurz überlegt, was die uns alles reinhämmern wollten. Alpha, Beta, Omikron, was gab's noch? Irgendwelche anderen bösartigsten Killervarianten und jetzt ist es ganz Das Speaker 3: Virus mutiert, eine Welle folgt der anderen. Aufgebrachte Bürger Speaker 0: Nee, eben nicht. Eben nicht. Sie erzählen schon wieder was von Welle. Sie versuchen echt, die ganze Geschichte noch einigermaßen zu halten. Ich verachte euch echt für alles. Wir vergessen nicht wirklich. Welle, die redet von Wellen, Es gab gar keine Wellen. Speaker 3: Coronaleugner, Impfskeptiker, sogenannte Spaziergänger stigmatisiert von Verantwortlichen. Speaker 5: Meine Damen und Herren, der Spaziergang hat seine Unschuld verloren. Speaker 0: Also meine Damen und Herren, der der Spaziergang hat seine Unschuld verloren. Müsste verhaftet werden. Bin ich wirklich, stehe ich dazu dieser Aussage? Meiner Ansicht nach müssten die alle verhaftet werden. Speaker 6: Denke, dass wir Speaker 0: Und das hier ist Richtig. Professor Frauke, Herr Rostalsky, die denkt 'n bisschen, Rechtsphilosophin in Düsseldorf. Speaker 5: Der Spaziergang hat seine Unschuld verloren. Speaker 6: Ich denke, dass wir durch die Coronapandemie Speaker 0: Wir können Speaker 6: eine erhebliche Spaltung in unserer Gesellschaft erfahren haben und dass die bis heute fortdauerte. Und es geht nicht darum, eine Entschuldigung zu verlangen, weil man im Nachhinein doch recht haben möchte. Speaker 0: Doch, darum zum Beispiel, es werden ein Teil, ja, es entscheidest Du, Frauke, was worum's bei mir jetzt geht oder worum's für mich jetzt geht, ja. Das ist so übergriffig, so unverschämt, ja, was die Alte da raushaut. Es ist wirklich unglaublich. Speaker 6: Oder weil man nachtreten möchte oder Ähnliches, sondern es geht darum, ein Signal an diese Teile der Bevölkerung zu senden, ein Signal des Verständnisses und des Aufeinanderzugehens. Nee, vielen Dank. Nee, danke. Speaker 3: Drei Jahre Pandemie, keine politische Aufarbeitung. Corona hat Speaker 0: Ich muss da noch mal drauf eingehen. Aufeinander zugehen. Ich geh nicht auf Leute zu, die mich umbringen wollten, die mir schwerste gesundheitliche Schäden verursachen wollten und die mir auch als Covid selbst, Lockdown und so weiter. Ihr wusstet es und auf solche Leute, auf euch soll ich zugehen? Ganz sicher nicht. Ja, das war das Gleiche noch mal. Wo sind jetzt diese vom umstrittenen Medienkonzernen ÖER geheilten Coronaerklärer? Lesch, Mai Thai, Hirschhausen, nur einige zu nennen und die geschehensbegleiteten Lachmuskelfreunde Böhmi, Welke, Uthoff, wer ist 'n Uthoff, kenn ich gar nicht. Und die Hürde an Impfpromiss, die ihr aufgefahren habt. Hier den Arm, ja, hier die Hayali, der der Jauch, Peter Maffay, was weiß ich und die lustigen Tagesthemenkommentatoren mit schönen Dank auch ihr Ungeimpften. Montgomery, Tyrannei der Ungeimpften, Söder haben wir grade gehört, Pandemie der Ungeimpften und vier Jahre nach der Spalte der Gesellschaft durch Impfterror, Hetze und Diskriminierung drehen Politiker wie Armin die Fahne in den Wind, waren also schon immer dagegen. Komisch, dass Laschet dann im April zweitausendzweiundzwanzig für die Impfpflicht gestimmt hat. Speaker 7: Und das ist die Spaltung der Gesellschaft, denn die Frage ist, wie haben wir damals diskutiert? Wie sind wir mit anderen Meinungen umgegangen? Das ist bis heute fortgesetzt Speaker 1: Corona ist einundzwanzig schon Speaker 7: Und das ist die Spaltung der Gesellschaft, denn die Frage ist, wie haben wir damals diskutiert? Wie sind wir mit anderen Meinungen umgegangen? Das ist bis heute fortgesetzt, immer noch ein Feuer für Populisten gegen den Staat wissenschaftliche Expertise nutzen müssen. Wir hätten unterschiedliche Meinungen, neue Dialogkultur, die Speaker 0: hätte, hätte Fahrradkette. Halt Herrn Mund. Armin Laschet, CDUCSU, Ministerpräsident a d, siebter vierter zweiundzwanzig, Impfpflicht gegen SARS Covid mit ja gestimmt, ja. Habt keine weiteren Fragen, euer Ehren, ja. Sei einfach still, ja. Schweig für immer, wirklich. Obwohl Georg Wrestle halb Twitter blockiert hat, bekam ich dieses zu sehen. Er hat eine zentrale Aufgabe als Journalist entdeckt zu differenzieren. Achtung, vierundzwanziger, zwanzigster August zweitausendzwanzig NPD dritter W, Kompakt IB, AfD, Rechtsextremisten mobilisieren massiv für die Berliner Corona Demonstration B neunundzwanzig null acht. Das war der August, die große zweitausendzwanziger Demo. Querdenken, Ballweg und so weiter, damit keine Missverständnisse aufkommen. Wer mit diesen Leuten gemeinsam demonstriert, weiß was er tut und mit wem. Achtung und jetzt am fünfundzwanzigsten März, heute. Und noch mal, nicht jeder der überbordende Coronamaßnahmen kritisiert hat, ist ein Schwurbler oder Rechtsextremer, auch wenn viele damit ihre braune Suppe gekocht haben, auch das gehört zum Job, das wir differenzieren. Speaker 3: Also es Speaker 0: steht für sich selber. Liebe Zuschauer, entscheidet bitte selber. Hier seht das. Wer mit diesen Leuten gemeinsam demonstriert, weiß was er tut und mit wem, ja? Aber und zum Job gehört auch, dass wir differenzieren bald, die sind so fertig, ehrlich. Und die Punkband Punk, ich laufe mir immer, ich laufe immer noch, die Ärzte stand während dieser Pandemie, symptomatisch für die echte Ärzteschaft. Charakterlos, eierlos, ehrlos, hirnlos, Geld, jedes Ethos über Bord geworfen, pseudoantifa. So schaut's aus. Eine Rückkerze Normalität funktioniert nur über Impfungen, sagen die Ärzte. Und noch mal, am Anfang des Videos habe ich's gefragt, wieso muss eigentlich multipolar das kleine, vergleichsweise kleine Magazin, die RKI falz freiklagen, das war auch recht teuer, Anwaltskosten, hat denen kein einziges hat denen kein einziges großes Medienhaus Interesse an dem Thema? Wieso eigentlich nicht FAZ, SZ, DER SPIEGEL, Focus online, stern d e, die ZEIT und Co. Euer Schweigen ist Keine einzige Maßnahme, wirklich mal scharf kritisiert oder wirklich hier Klartext geschrieben, gesprochen, gesendet. Nichts, nichts, nichts, nichts. Ihr habt einfach vollkommen versagt, in den Spiegel fällt in dem Zusammenhang nichts besseres ein, als einen eigenen Artikel darüber über ihr Multiplarmagazin noch mal zu korrigieren und plötzlich ist es jetzt das rechte Multiplarmagazin, der Verständnis für Russland hat und so weiter und so fort. Ihr seid solche billigen echt verlotten, ihr seid billiges, billigste Hunde und jetzt versucht ihr hier auf ganz billig herauszukommen, Es kommt, ja? Mal schauen, wie die deutsche Öffentlichkeit damit umgeht, wie die das in der Erinnerung, wie die das empfinden. Immerhin ist es ja jetzt auch schon im Mainstream und erreicht auch die, die sonst gar nichts lesen und mal schauen, wie auch die Opfer der Genplörre hier vielleicht dann noch mal neuen Motivationsschub bekommen, hier dagegen vorzugehen, weil noch mal das Ganze verjährt auch übrigens, ja. Also da sollte man, ich glaube der Einziger Zwölfte ist ein dieses Jahr, diesen Jahres ist glaube ich son Datum, wo dann etliche Ansprüche verjähren, wenn man bis dahin keine Ansprüche gestellt hat. Ich sag's nur bitte bitte erkundigen wen das betrifft, ja. Es bleibt also nicht ewig bestehen, da eine Möglichkeit, sich da rechtlich da oder über 'n Klageweg da Recht zu verschaffen, ja. So, ja, also in diesem Sinne, liebe Leute, ja, immerhin, ich will jetzt nicht alle schlecht reden, aber das ist natürlich schon ein harter Witz hier, ja. Die die geschwärzten Protokolle hier, das ist natürlich schon brutal, ja. Aber noch brutaler ist wahrscheinlich, dass die Sachen, die nicht geschwärzt sind, schon dermaßen entlarvend und dermaßen, ja, wirklich sensationell, muss man schon fast sagen, sind, dass man echt hier zumindest sagen kann, okay, also es ist jetzt nicht, es wird jetzt nicht mit allem aller Macht hier der Deckel drauf gehalten, aber wenn noch mal 'n Glückwunsch am Multipolarmagazin, das habt ihr toll gemacht und in diesem Sinne an alle anderen vor allem viel größeren Medien, ihr habt es nicht toll gemacht, aber das ist ja nix Neues. Ja. Abonnieren, liken, teilen, kommentieren und wenn ihr uns finanziell unterstützen wollt, gerne auf Kofi Bitcoin Stripde und deutscher Bankverbindung. Macht das gut ihr Lieben. Servus, danke, das rutscht hier einfach weiter so durch. Super.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Write up on developing scandal in Germany https://www.aussie17.com/p/germanys-developing-scandal

Germany's Developing Scandal! Who are they taking orders from?? aussie17.com
_aussie17
Posted - March 20, 2024 at 1:31 PM
Saved - March 20, 2024 at 4:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Three footballers have collapsed on live TV this week. Ahmed Refaat, a 30-year-old Egyptian national footballer, suffered a cardiac arrest during a match but his heart started beating again after an hour. Another player, Javier Altamirano, had a seizure during a match. Makhehlene Makhaula, a midfielder for Orlando Pirates, also collapsed on the field. Footballers collapsing on the pitch is not a new occurrence, despite what some may think.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🤯🤯 Wow! 3rd footballer collapsed on live TV this week! 30 year old Egyptian National Footballer Ahmed Refaat collapsed on the pitch during a match between his club Modern Future FC and Ittihad. The Egyptian international suffered a cardiac arrest and was taken to hospital. After an hour, his heart started beating again. Club's medical supervisors claimed doctors hadn’t seen something like it before.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

👇

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Oh my god, second footballer collapsed on live TV in two days. Estudiantes’ Javier Altamirano suffers a seizure during match against Boca

@_aussie17 - aussie17

👇

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🤯🤯🤯 Orlando Pirates midfielder Makhehlene Makhaula collapses on field yesterday, listen again to the stunned announcer: "World football, unfortunately, has been subject to so many distressing scenes on the pitch over the last few years" Maybe this announcer is brand new on the job, footballers have been collapsing all the time on the pitch for decades! 😡😡

Video Transcript AI Summary
The player gets injured during the game, prompting concern and calls for medical assistance. The commentators express hope for the player's well-being, acknowledging the distressing scenes that have occurred in football recently. They emphasize the importance of focusing on the player's health over the game's outcome.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's have a look. Clears the ball. Did he pull something as he was carrying the ball? Speaker 1: Oh, what's happening here? Speaker 0: Doesn't look good. It just doesn't look it just doesn't look good. Speaker 2: Get the medical stuff. Get them on. Speaker 0: Prayers. And this sort of situations are always called for prayer. Speaker 2: World football, unfortunately, has been subject to so many distressing scenes Yeah. On the pitch over the last few years. Yeah. We're really hoping for the best up here. Just, waiting along with you at home to to to learn any new information. If you're wrong in this moment, just to talk about the game, the football, the stats. We just wanna know that Speaker 1: he is or he is.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

SOURCE https://lovin.co/cairo/en/latest/he-suffers-from-a-rare-heart-condition-medical-supervisor-confirms-ahmed-refaats-condition/

“He Suffers From A Rare Heart Condition” Medical Supervisor Confirms Ahmed Refaat's condition Amr Sultan, one of Modern Future F.C.'s medical supervisors announced that Egyptian player Ahmed Refaat suffers from a rare heart condition. lovin.co
_aussie17
Posted - February 22, 2024 at 10:33 PM
Saved - February 25, 2024 at 11:14 PM

@_aussie17 - aussie17

💥🤯Sky News Australia reports on vaccine harms and censorship! it's Judgement Day! @SenatorRennick https://t.co/jVjDDo9457

Video Transcript AI Summary
The UK faces scrutiny over vaccine safety as individuals share their vaccine injury experiences with Rishi Sunak. In Australia, Senator Jared Rennick presses for transparency on vaccine batch details, met with redacted information. The TGA's lack of disclosure raises concerns about vaccine safety and accountability. Senator Rennick's persistence in seeking answers is commended.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, it's judgment day in the UK. Here's Rishi Sunak just 2 weeks ago on the floor of the House of Lords assuring people of this one fact that they still so desperately want us to believe. Speaker 1: Let me be unequivocal from this dispatch box that COVID vaccines are safe. Speaker 0: Except that they're not, are they, prime minister? And he was forced to admit this when face to face with 1 of tens of thousands of vaccine injured individuals in the UK? Speaker 2: I want you to look into my eyes, Rashid Shoonek, and I want you to look at the pain, the trauma, and the regret I have in my eyes. We have been left with no help at all. Not only am I in here this vaccine, and so there's another man over there whose life's been ruined by that COVID 19 vaccine. I know people who have lost legs, amputations. I know people with heart conditions like myself, Rishi Sunak. Why have I had to set up a support group in Scotland to look after the people that have been affected by that COVID 19 vaccine? Why are the people who are in charge, who told us all to do the right thing, have left us all tear up and left me and the 1,000 and the tens of 1,000 in this country to rot. Speaker 1: There is a vaccine compensation scheme that's in place, as you alluded to in the NHS. Obviously, everyone individually will work through their cases. It's difficult for me to comment on anyone's individual case. I'm sure you'll appreciate that. I'm very happy to go and look at the cases, and I'm sure you'll get them to the team here. I mean, I I'm very saddened and shocked to hear that you've been silenced by anybody. That is surprising to me. Speaker 0: You flat out liar. You said 2 weeks ago, unequivocally, your own word, unequivocally safe, then why is there 30,000 people in that gentleman's support group, Prime Minister? And why are you admitting outright just 2 weeks later to him, oh, there is a vaccine injury compensation scheme, much like we have here in Australia. Why are you still saying it's safe? It says a lot regarding why there's not one single pandemic premier left here in Australia. And indeed, the man who was prime minister, Scott Morrison, during that time has also announced his resignation. Do they know a judgment day is coming here in Australia as well? Meanwhile, here in our own parliament, here is senator Jared Rennick who has done absolutely everything to hold the government to account for the complete and utter lies it told over the pandemic. Here he is simply trying to find out how safe these vaccines are. He's asking the TGA for batch details. Speaker 3: At the last, set of estimates, I've put a question on notice that after evidence and results of safety testing in regards to commercially produced batches. And, I note recently, there was a release, FOI, Freedom of Information, 44,558 that also asked for the, data of the batches. And in my and your answer to my response was a link that had no actual data in it. And I note that the FOI for 4,558 with 70 pages of of blanked out data, can we get the batch information that was asked in this FOI that shows what was in the batches and the batch testing place? Speaker 4: Senator, I I appreciate the irony, but I might have to take that on notice. That does predate my arrival. Speaker 3: That that's fine. But what I want is a commitment from you to be completely transparent about what was in those batches. Speaker 2: I will give you Speaker 4: a commitment to be as transparent as I can within the constraints of our Freedom of Information requirements. Speaker 0: Why would the TGA not disclose their batch testing results? You saw the page Jared Redneck held up there. The whole thing was redacted. It was a page of black. The Therapeutic Goods Administration of Australia, you forced millions of people to take this. You swore till you were blue in the face. It was safe. We deserve to know. Why won't they release this? Why won't they release this? If there's nothing to hide, you'd think it would just be like, oh, here you go. Here's all the reassurance in the world. They won't release it or they will, but it's so heavily logical answer to this question. And when you've got millions of Australians you forced to take this thing, tens of thousands of Aussies whose lives are forever changed by vaccine injuries. This is unconscionable. It is unforgivable. Speaker 4: And kudos to Senator Renick because he's been like a dog with a bone on the shoe. Speaker 0: He's a legend. And can I just ask Speaker 4: Australians should be grateful to him? Speaker 0: Authorized G Renick LNP term site.
_aussie17
Posted - February 22, 2024 at 12:08 AM
Saved - February 22, 2024 at 5:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Japanese Ministry of Health has increased the COVID vaccine Health Damage Budget by 110 times, indicating a significant expectation of health damages. A systematic review of literature has revealed unprecedented side effects after vaccination, affecting various organs. Medical censorship and obstructions hinder reporting on vaccine damage. Adverse effects of the vaccines are well understood, with the spike protein and lipid nanoparticles being toxic. Failed vaccines are still being administered, and a database of reported side effects has been created. Various diseases across medical fields have been reported as side effects of the vaccine.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Holy moly! 🚨🚨 Japanese Ministry of Health increased COVID vaccine Health Damage Budget by a staggering 110 times vs previous estimates. They are expecting a lot of health damages! ---------------------- As for the basis, it's related to the FY2025 fiscal year's new coronavirus vaccine health damage budget. This budget was initially 360 million yen. However, with the supplementary budget, it turned out to be 39.77 billion yen. Indeed, it has become 110 times larger from previous estimate, it can be considered that the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare assumes over 100 times more health damage incidents have occurred. What do you think? ------------------

Video Transcript AI Summary
新型コロナワクチンの被害認定予算が増額され、110倍の健康被害が懸念される。厚生労働省が39.7億7000万円の予算を想定。Health damage from the COVID-19 vaccine in the fiscal year 2023 has led to a budget increase to 39.7 billion 700 million yen, raising concerns of over 100 times the expected health damage by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: の 根拠 ですけれども 令和 5 年度 の 新型コロナ ワクチン の 先行 被害 認定 に関わる 予算 額 ですこの 予算 が 当初 は3 億 6 000万円 でした けれども 補正 予算 で なんと ですね 39 7 億 700 0 万円 実に 1 10 岩 になっております ここから 厚生労働省 が 想定 する 100 倍 以上の 健康 被害 が出て しまった と 考えられます が いかがでしょうか

@_aussie17 - aussie17

SOURCE https://t.co/3vvk4v5EPW

@JINKOUZOUKA_jp - 藤江@日本人、謎の大量死※コロナでは説明できない

本日の厚生労働大臣記者会見 令和５年度 新型コロナワクチンの健康被害給付に関する予算 ３億６千万円➡３９７億７千万円 110倍に爆増していました。 新型コロナワクチンの健康被害の規模は、想定の100倍以上だったことが見てとれる。 #新型コロナワクチン健康被害110倍 ↓正確な数字は↓ 当初予算 359,859（千円） 補正予算後 39,770825（千円） 令和5年度厚生労働省所管 一般会計歳予算補正(第1号)各目明細書　10ページに記載あり https://www.mhlw.go.jp/wp/yosan/yosan/23hosei/dl/231129_01.pdf

Video Transcript AI Summary
新型コロナワクチンの健康被害認定に関わる予算が10倍に増え、100倍以上の被害が出た可能性がある。厚生労働省が39.7億円の予算を補正し、被害の規模が大きいと考えられる。 Translation: The budget related to health damage certification for the new coronavirus vaccine has increased tenfold, reaching 39.7 billion yen. There is a possibility that over 100 times more health damage occurred. The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare's budget adjustment suggests a significant impact.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: コン ト ですけれども 令和 5 年度 の 新型コロナ ワクチン の 健康 被害 認定 に関わる 予算 額 ですこの 予算 が 当初 は3 億 6 000万円 でした けれども 補正 予算 で なんと ですね 39 7 億 7 000万円 実に 1 10 倍 になっております ここから 厚生労働省 が 想定 する 100 倍 以上の 健康 被害 が出て しまった と 考えられます が いかがでしょうか

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Related https://t.co/3g1kkeHNhT

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 "UNPRECEDENTED SIDE EFFECTS" Press Conference from Japan's "Vaccine Issues Study Group", January 11, 2024. ---Highlights--- Professor Emeritus Masanori Fukushima from Kyoto University: A systematic review of the literature has revealed some surprising facts. Thousands of papers have reported side effects after vaccination, which affect every organ without exception. Ranging from ophthalmology to general medicine to psychiatry. These documents have been preliminarily investigated by a group of volunteer physicians. They have looked into how many cases have been reported by Japanese academic societies. This kind of reporting on drug side effects or the like is unprecedented. For example, the age-adjusted mortality rate for leukemia has increased. And there are significant findings for breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and so on. We will share the relevant information with everyone as we advise and request the government on how to proceed. Regarding medical censorship with the vaccines: Japanese doctors are trying hard, but they face various obstructions. There's this negative sentiment of 'Why report something like vaccine damage?' There are interferences. Such actions themselves hinder academic freedom, and in some academic departments, censorship is taking place. Such as in conference presentations and paper publications. This is happening globally. Some journals are effectively practicing censorship. Regarding Brain related adverse events : mental disorders, psychiatric symptoms, depression, mania, anxiety...etc About the spike protein sequence, within the genes, you know, he(Luc Montagnier) was warning that if there's a prion-like sequence, it could be very dangerous. Many scientists were warning. I too said it could be hazardous because of the possibility of prions. I discussed it with prion experts. Professor Yasufumi Murakami from Tokyo University of Science: Regarding adverse effects of the vaccines: One thing I want to say initially is that it is clear how the adverse effects occur, which is still holding many victims today. I believe it should be stopped immediately. The mechanism by which adverse effects occur is well understood; the spike is toxic. It's very clear what happens when you administer a toxic gene to a human. Another point is that the Lipidnanoparticles also induce very intense reactions, so this is also toxic. The major problem is, we are injecting two toxic substances into people, one of which being that human cells are producing spike proteins. Since the immune system will attack this, this causes very violent genetics reactions to emerge. There are cases that occur within one or two weeks after injection, but there are also many cases that appear after one or two years. Regarding IgG4 antibody: Usually with vaccines, if an IgG4 antibody is induced, it is considered a failure, however, with the current messenger-type vaccines, a significant amount of IgG4 is being induced. When this happens, it plays tricks on various immune functions. Therefore, we want to thoroughly investigate what ratio of Japanese people are inducing this, and we aim to carefully examine what level of IgG4 that reacts with the spike protein is present in each individual. Regarding failed vaccines: Vaccines that have failed are still being administered, and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare recognizes these failed vaccines. So I would like them to stop immediately, and even though I speak out in various places, they don't stop at all, so we will clearly present evidence and publish it as articles one by one. Professor Masayasu Inoue who is Emeritus Professor at Osaka City University School of Medicine: So, we are working with Dr. Fukushima to create this database, and so far, about 201 types of diseases and 3,071 papers on side effects have been reported. It is unprecedented in human history for a single vaccine to have this much literature out on it. With this, we plan to present it to the nation and the Japanese government in the form of solid science that no one can dispute. ...you will find diseases of the heart, kidney, thyroid, diabetes, liver, skin, eyes, blood, nerves, systemic diseases, brain, lungs, diseases across all medical fields have been reported, and as Professor Fukushima stated, The characteristic of the side effects of this vaccine is As for the data, when diseases such as those of the heart, kidney, endocrine, and liver are taken simultaneously with the range in which they occur, it turns out that a tremendous number of papers are reported over many pages. ------------------------------------------- H/T:@JINKOUZOUKA_jp @midfado_22

Video Transcript AI Summary
A press conference was held to report on the results of the Vaccine Issues Research Association, which was established six months ago. The speakers expressed condolences to those who have suffered health problems or passed away after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. They discussed the shocking number of papers reporting vaccine side effects across various organs and specialties. They emphasized the need for further research and the development of testing methods. The speakers also highlighted the importance of understanding the off-target effects and potential risks associated with the vaccine. They called for a deeper understanding of biology and medical principles to address the current situation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 警告 となりました ので 去 る 20 2 3年 6 月16日 に 捨て てしまった 一般 社 団 法人 ワクチン 問題 研究 会 設立 後 6 か月 の 成果 報告 に関する 記者会見 を 開催 いたします 改 め まして 私は 本日 司会 を 止め させて いきます 竹 口 と申します まずはじめに この 場 を 借り して 新型コロナ ワクチン接種 後の 健康 被害 により 亡くなり に な られた 方々 に 慎 んで お 悔 や み 申し上げます また そういった 健康 被害 を受けた 方 現在 も その 症状 に 苦 しま れている 方々 に対し まして より お 見 舞い 申し上げます Speaker 1: その 件 に関して 文 献 を 系統 的に 調査 しました 驚 愕 する 事実 が 話 します 数 千 に 上 る 論文 が ワクチン接種 後の 副 作用 として 報告 されている とその 数 を わ さ ること になる すべての 臓 器 に 渡って もう あの なんか から それから 一般 の 内 科 から それから 精神 精神 そこで それを 論文 に まとめて 昨日 公開 されました 有 志 医師 の 会 が 事前に 調査 しました 日本 の 学 会 で どれだけ の 症 例 が 報告 されている か こういうこと は 今まで 薬 の 副 作用 とかですね なんか でも 一切 なかった ことです 私は 癌 の 専門 ですから 抗 がん 剤 というのは 不 採用 の 嵐 に 思われ る わけですけど パターン は 決まって る し 知れ てる わけです この ワクチン による 副 作用 機 の パターン が 決まって ない 全身 に 起こる 複数の 疾患 が 同時に 起こる 見たこと がない というのが 医者 の 率 直 な 意見 です 日本の 先生方 も 頑張って ですね 色々な 邪魔 が 入っ そんな ワクチン の 被害 なんか 報告 して どうする んだ とかね 邪魔 が入る んですよ こういうこと 自体が やっぱり 学問 の 自由 を 紹介する 話 ですし それから ある 教室 は 検 閲 が 行われる んですよ 学 会 発表 だろう これが 全 世界 的に 起こ っています ジャー ナル によって はもう 自 律 上 検 閲 が 行われ て これは 朝 日 新聞 は 全面 的に ダ フ な 調査 で 過剰 強化 死亡 ということを 一度 やってます けども ちゃんと 年齢 調整 で きちっと 統計 的に 評価 に 耐え る 形に します と ですね 驚く べき ことが コツ 実は 特定の ガン が 超 過 死亡 が ワクチン の 3回目 接種 以降 に 起こ って るという ことがわかります 今 論文 にして 佐 野 区 に 回って ますが おそらく 近 景 で トーク パ ブ すること になります Speaker 0: 続きまして 検査 方法を 開発 は 聞い グループ 担当 理事 の 村 上 安 部 により 検査 法 開発 の 進捗 状況 と 今後の 見通し についてご説明 いたします 皆様 よろしくお願いします Speaker 2: どうぞ 初めに 僕は 言って おきたい の は どういう 仕 組 で 副 作用 が発生 するか 明確に な っ て 大勢 被害者 が出ている もの ですね 今 で 持ってる こと 今 すぐ 止める べき だと思います じゃあ どういう 風な 組織 見て ですね ファン の 腐 敗 を 発生 するか っていうのは 話は そっと 上がって まして スパイ ク は 有 毒 なんですよね 有 毒 な 遺伝子 を 開ける と 取り 憑 依 を 汚 く どうなるか って 非常に 明確 です もう一つ は 脂 質 座 の 粒子 も ですね 非常に 排 泄 に しようと するということ ですので これも 有 毒 なんです 2つの 有 毒 なもの を 一人で 打って る っていう事 なんですが もう 一段 大きな 問題は ヒ ト 細胞 で スパイ ク タンパク質 を 作っている ということです これは 免疫 系 が ですね 痩せ ようと いたします ので 非常に 阪神 印象 が発生 するということ なんですね で もう一つ 打って から 1週間 2週間 達成 するっていう ふう なもの を かかります が 1年 2年 経過 してから 現れる と いう ふう なもの も お よい あと もう一つ は 優秀な 抗 体 と 悪い 抗 体 という 理由 に 使われ まして IGG 4 T の 抗 体 は ウェイ キ オ ムシ と 押 される 働き を持っています 普通の ワクチン だと IGG 4 抗 体 誘導 した とか 失敗 だ というふうに 言われます ところが 今回の スイッチ ャ ー ド ワクチン では すごい 量 の YGG 法 が 誘導 されています それが 誘導 されます と いろんな 免疫 に ですね いた ずら をする わけです そういうこと ですので それが 日本人の ですね どういう 風な その 比率 で 誘導 されている と しっかりと 調べて いこう と ということで 我々 がある スパイ ク タンパク質 と 反応 する IGG 4 が ひとり ひとり で どういう レベル で 存在 を して 床 を しっかりと 調べて います もちろん ですね 問題 なのは ですね こういう あたり まで もう わかって る わけですよ 失敗 した 失敗 した と ワクチン を 今でも 打って いて この 功 労 者 認めて る わけです 失敗 してほしい よ だから これは 僕 を 言えば すぐ ですね 述べ て ほしい って 思ってます し いろんな ところで そういう 発信 発言 をして も 一 向 に やめて やめ ないと いうこと ですので 我々 の 明確に 夢 で 促 していって 1個 1個 かけて 一つ一つ 論文 として 発表 を 買っ していきたいと思います Speaker 3: そういうこと でこの データベース を作ろう ということで 福島 先生 と一緒に やって おります が 今のところ の だいたい 200 1 種類の 疾患 と そして 脳 副 作用 の 報告 数 としては 3 、 0 7 1本 の 論文 が出ている ということで まぁ 一つの ワクチン で こん だけの ロング が で てくる な これ 人類 史上 初めて でございます まあ そういうこと で これを きちっと した 科学 として 誰も 反論 できない ような形で 国 と 日本の 意思 に 提 唱 しようと思って ます 次の スライド を ね そういうこと でこの 右 にある の はちょっと 細かく て 恐 縮 ですが お 手 元の ハンド アウト のデータ が 見て いただけます と 心臓 の 病気 、 腎 臓 の 病気 、 甲 状 腺 の 病気 、 糖尿病 、 肝 臓 血液 の 病気 そして 神経 の 病気 全身 の 病気 脳 の 病気 肺 の 病気 あり と あらゆる 医学 の 全 ジャンル に わ たる 病気 が 報告 されている ということ 福島 代表 が おっ しゃ った ように 前 科 が 一 斉 に パッと 発症 するのが 今回の ワクチン の 副 作用 の 特 色 です そういうこと で 次の スライド お願いします そういうこと で バー ト それぞれの データを 心臓 腎 臓 内 分 泌 感 度 というふうに 病 名 で 撮る と同時に どういう 風な 範囲 で 言ってる 過程 の じょう んと ありますが ものすごい 何 ページ にも わ たる 論文 が 報告 されている いうこと で これは Speaker 1: 精神 障害 精神 症状 うつ病 欲 仏 不安 心 それから 精神 病 いっぱい 出てくる わけですけど も キリ がない んだね なんで こうなる の? っていうこと ですけどね これ 実際 もっと 黄色い キーワード ね今 のような コピー の ナイ キ ワーク ス って んじゃなくて サーブ コ ブ トゥ メ ッ セン ジャー R NA ワクチン とか いろんな キーワード に分けて やっていく かね どんどんどんどん もっと 出てきます だから これは 一部 です 先ほど 井 上 先生 紹介した ベース も あくまで パ ズ メ ロ という データベース でやって 一部 なんですけど パ ズ メ ロ で 引っ かからない の が だから ヤコブ 病 が 引っ かかって ない 次の スライド ところが こういう 歴史 とした 論文 が モン ター に 果たして HRV ね エース の ウイルス 発見 して 農業 して もらった 先生の これ 遺 言 的な 部分 ですよ 彼は ものすごく 最初から 警戒 して たんです この スパイ グ 残 波 の チー プ レース の中に 遺伝子 の中に ですよ プリ オン リー ジョン カップ 料 と 同じような に あの です 配列 がある これは 非常に 危険 だということ を 警告 してた んですよ かなり の 学者 が 警告 して ました だから 筋肉 注射 すれば それが 周辺 の に 取り 込まれて いい だろう って ものすごい ア バ ウ ト な 医学 生物 学 を 全く 知らない 人は そういうこと 考え ないから メ ッ セ じゃあ ル ネ ワ ク チン じゃないか っていう わけですよ ところが 生物 学 医学 して たら そんな スペ シ フィ ック のこと 起こ らない と 浮いて き なく つまり それ オフ ターゲット って言う んですよ 目標 とする ところ 以外 に オフ ターゲット について ou t of コントロール だよ どこに いく か わかんない 血 流 に 塗った ら 行ったら さ それは 脳 にも 行く し 家族 にも 行く し ね 腎 臓 に そこ ら じゅう で 作 っちゃった ら どうなる の ってこと が 思い 浮か ば ない わけ だから それは ものすごく ア バ ウ ト な 話 でしょ ね オフ ターゲット の話 だから それ 解決 できて ないんですよ 2人 と だから それが 解決 できたら どうか って言って も まだ 問題は いっぱい ある んですよ というような ナ ノ パーティクル っていうのが これが ス ケ ス クセ モノ って さっき 詠 唱 性 だって 7 パーティクル は プラスチック 7 パーティクル 世界中 で 問題 になっている 環境 性 ある 脳 に入る んですよ ところが 何 にも 知らない 人は ね や プラスチック だから そんな 消化 されない から これ 食べた って いいでしょう って 怒り の あの 知った ふり して その 消化 されない です そうした 全く トーン まで ナ ノ パーティクル の 表面 に どれだけ で 有 毒 な 有 機 物質 がついている か わかんない わけですよ だから そういう ね 知識 の 断 片 で ね 物事 を 新 小 膨 大 に ね 拡大 して これで いける わかった これで いい んだ そういう 感じ だね だから 全く トーン まで まああの 正直 もう もう一度 ね 中学校 の 生物 学 から 高校 大学の 入 試 まで やり 直 してもらう 皆さん そういう 人は そういうこと 言ってる 人 まだ さっき 言ったように 医学 もある 家族 まだ 未 熟 なんですよ 基本的に 我々は 生命 原理 について ほとんど わかって ない それが 今 今回 こういうこと が 起き ちゃって だから 災 い 転 じ て ここで もう一度 学び 直 すべき なんです 何が 起こった の? そう じゃなくて は ワクチン それ 行け それ 行け っていうのは ね それは あの ちょっと もう 無 知 蒙 昧 とか さ もう そういう 世界 ですよ だから もう そういう ね 信仰 になっちゃって る からね ワクチン 供給 で 邪 教 ですよ もう それ だから 無限 地獄 に 陥 っちゃった り な 基本 的 だから そういう 単純に そういうこと で 知識 の 断 片 で 物事 全体 を理解 できた と思う の は 間違い
_aussie17
Posted - January 13, 2024 at 12:12 AM
Saved - January 13, 2024 at 5:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A mother shares a heartbreaking account of her daughter's death after receiving the Moderna vaccine. She believes the vaccine caused myocardial infarction and myocarditis. Politicians are exempt from vaccinations, and the media ignores adverse effects. She speaks out to raise awareness and stop the vaccines. #NeverForget

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Please spare 10 minutes to watch this clip in which Deborah Hamilton, the mother of Natalie Boyce, recounts the events leading to her daughter's death, caused by the Moderna vaccine. They want you to forget this. #NeverForget Audible gasps could be heard in the audience when she discovered that all politicians were exempt from vaccinations that was mandatory for her daugther. Highlights--------------------------- Tragically, my healthy daughter Natalie Boyce was killed by the Moderna vaccine at the age of 21 years old on the 27th March 2022. . ... Natalie did have antiphospholipid syndrome that was well managed. She was very healthy and she rarely attended the doctor. we only discovered she had APS when she had her appendix removed at 15. She would see a leading haematologist at the Royal Children's Hospital once a year to take her bloods and he was always happy with her condition as she never had any symptoms. We asked his advice via a telehealth appointment about her having the vaccine and he told us it was safe to have any of the mRNA vaccines. ... Natalie's death certificate shows that she died of myocardial cardio infarction and that she had subacute myocarditis. I believe this was all caused by the Moderna vaccination that we told was safe and effective and also the multiple hospitals negligence. Natalie is recognised as the 14th TGA death from the vaccine. ... I was speaking in the Senate regarding the COVID vaccination bill and to stop compulsory vaccinations in the Fair Work Act for workers. Only six senators bothered to attend the Senate hearing. Pauline Hanson afterwards told me that the bill would not pass as she was the sponsor and any bill that she starts will never pass legislation, but she only did it to gain awareness. ... Ironically, she also told me that politicians don't have to have the vaccine, they are exempt. Natalie's death has destroyed my life and severely impacted her brother Hayden. I hold those pushing vaccines also responsible for her death, especially Daniel Andrews. Most mainstream media will not report any of the adverse effects of vaccines. ... These deadly vaccines must stop now. I'm only speaking out so people have a right to make an informed decision and to be aware of the side effects of these vaccines before taking any more. --------------- @WhenMumsGetMad @AMPS_RedUnion @DrAseemMalhotra @cafelockedout

Video Transcript AI Summary
Deborah Hamilton expresses gratitude to organizations and individuals involved in promoting COVID vaccinations. She shares the tragic story of her daughter, Natalie Boyce, who passed away at 21 years old after receiving the Moderna vaccine. Natalie had a well-managed condition called antiphospholipid syndrome and was advised by a hematologist that the vaccine was safe. Natalie experienced adverse reactions after vaccination, including fainting, fever, stomach pain, and fatigue. Despite seeking medical help multiple times, hospitals failed to properly assess her condition. Natalie's health deteriorated, leading to heart failure and her eventual death. Deborah holds the vaccine and the negligence of multiple hospitals responsible for her daughter's passing. She urges people to be aware of vaccine side effects and make informed decisions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. My name is, Deborah Hamilton. And I would like to thank AMF, Cara, Doctor Seam, all the people presenting and all the staff, everything you are doing in trying to spread awareness of COVID vaccinations. Tragically, my healthy daughter, Natalie Boyce, was killed by the Moderna vaccine at the age of 21 years old on the 27th March 2022. She died on my late mother's birthday. Natalie had the fatal Moderna vaccine a week after we celebrated her 21st at his birthday. Little did we know that she would be deceased 5 weeks later. Natalie did have antiphospholipid syndrome that was well managed. She was very healthy and she rarely attended the doctor. We only discovered she had APS when she had her appendix removed at 15. She would see a leading haematologist at the Royal Children's Hospital once a year to take her bloods and he was always happy with her condition as she never had any symptoms. We asked his advice via telehealth appointment about her having the vaccine and he told us it was safe to have any of the mRNA vaccines. Natalie reacted the very next day from the Moderna COVID vaccine. She fainted in her en suite and remained in her bed for the rest of the day. Natalie continued to be unwell with a fever, stomach pain, and limiting. So we attended the local GP who prescribed her reflux medication. We had told the GP she had just had the vaccine but she did not perform any investigations on her heart. She was still not well so that night we went to the Anglers Hospital in Ferntree Gully. She stayed there for about 5 hours. The angler's gave her fluids which I have since found out would have put more pressure on her at, they also sent her home saying she had reflux. A week later, Natalie continued to be extremely unwell. So So I took her to Monash Hospital. This was my biggest mistake. This hospital was an absolute shambles. She was there for 16 hours, mainly left sitting in a chair with a vomit bag. They also gave her several bags of fluids and then sent her home with a discharge report that I still have that says she looks well from both the attending doctor and the specialist. They did not perform any checks on her heart even though they knew she had been sick since she had the vaccine. For all of these visits at the hospitals, I was denied entry with her even though I was triple vaccinated. So I couldn't advocate for her. About About 36 hours later, I called an ambulance as my daughter was in serious trouble. The operator advised me that she was not sending an ambulance and and then she would get a paramedic to call me back within half an hour and then they would decide if they would send an ambulance or not. I knew Natalie was in serious trouble so I drove her like a maniac to the closest local private hospital. Natalie was going in and out of consciousness as I was driving. Mulgrave Private we arrived at Mulgrave a private hospital. Mulgrave Private, Maiden Ali followed the government rules and for her to wait 15 minutes for a PCR test result while she was going in and out of consciousness. Once she tested negative, she was then seen immediately by the emergency doctor who straightaway diagnosed her in heart failure. Mulgrave realised that she was too unwell to be treated there and she would need to be sent to a major at the hospital. The ambulance service then sent a doctor immediately to the hospital to help with the transfer to the referred to the Alfred Hospital. She was transferred they were actually deciding whether she was going to be in helicopter. But in the end, she was transported in an adult retrieval ambulance, the highest ambulance in Victoria, about 8 hours later. This ambulance did not have the correct equipment either to transport her so they had to borrow equipment from the hospital. I kissed her and spoke to her in the ambulance because I wasn't allowed to go and that was the last at the time she ever spoke again. My daughter Natalie Boysen spent 3 weeks in ICU at the Alfred Hospital. She couldn't breathe on her and was put on the highest form of life support, the ECMO machine, which resulted in spinal cord damage. The whole time at the at the fridge, she was unconscious. And in that time, her heart and body gradually collapsed. Her heart and kidneys were failing. Her foot went back from a blood from a blood clot and she lost feeling in her leg. Natalie died in the MRI eye machine at the Alfred Hospital on the 27th March last year after they made a call to perform an MRI arrived to see if she had the spinal cord damage. To have this MRI, she was disconnected from all the life support machines which resulted in her death. Natalie's death certificate shows that she died of myocardial infarction action and that she had subacute myocarditis. I believe this was all caused by the Moderna vaccination that we told was safe and active and also the multiple hospitals' negligence. Natalie is recognized as the 14th TGA death from the Singh. Monash Hospital performed an independent panel review after her death, and Natalie and some of the cardiologists on the panel agreed that they failed in not checking her heart. Monash Hospital's Director of Emergency also admitted on the phone to me that they failed in that list treatment. The TGA also convened an external expert vaccine safety investor at Geitian Group on the 7th September 22 regarding as you called that Natalie's death might attract media attention as the TGA was going to put out the announcement, and I probably would be able to work out that they were talking about Natalie. I only found out when I looked it up online on the TGA site safety report, which was eventually published on the 23rd September, that an independent panel had been convened. On this panel called me for any information about Natalie. Also, not 1 person from the media contacted me about at the report and it was not reported anywhere in the media. I'm still waiting to receive the coroner's report and have been advised that her case is too complex and to not expect to receive it this year either. We would have to query why they are holding it off for at least 2 years. They have said it will only be a coroner's inquest faced if it is in the public's interest. The family liaison officer at the coroner's court back in December last last year advised me that she was sick of this case and all the calls they receive about it all the time. It is not me calling, so I have no idea who is calling them all the time. I have requested from the advice survey in I got a call from a legal representative that went acting for me just to tell me whatever I do, make ensure that her samples, retained indefinitely. I requested this of the coroner's office, and they will not answer me. I've told Natalie's story on Instagram at jab injuries Australia, Graham Hood's Club Grubbery, also frankchungnews.com.au, and Christine Mittapp at The have also published articles. I also spoke in parliament on the 2nd May 2020 this year. The full the full more detailed story can be seen there as I had parliament privilege. I I did say a lot more. I was speaking in the Senate regarding the COVID vaccination bill and to stop compulsory vaccinations in the Fair Work Act for workers. Only 6 senators bothered to attend the senate hearing. Pauline Hanson afterwards told me that the bill would not pass as she was the sponsor and any bill that she starts will never but she only did it to gain awareness. Ironically, she also told me that politicians don't have to have the vaccine. They are exempt. Natalie's death has destroyed my life and severely impacted her brother, at Hayden. I hold those pushing vaccines also responsible for her death, especially Daniel Andrews. Most mainstream media will not report any of the adverse effects of vaccines. No parent should have to arrange their child's funeral. I have this ribbon as part of her with me today. This is 1 of 2 ribbons she held in her often. My son and I cut it at the funeral and have kept the other half so she can be with us at all times. These deadly vaccines must stop now. I'm only speaking out so people have a right to make an informed decision and to be aware of the side effects of these at scenes before taking any more. I do not want anybody else to endure the pain that we are now going through. Natalie's voice's life did matter. Thank you.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

SOURCE https://amps.redunion.com.au/vic_malhotra#hs_cos_wrapper_module_1684286835871

VIC National Malhotra Tour 2023 Dr Aseem Malholta joins AMPS in Melbourne on the 1st and 2nd June for a public event: CURING THE CORRUPTION OF MEDICINE: A NEW BEGINNING amps.redunion.com.au

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Related https://x.com/_aussie17/status/1653359799680249856?s=20

@_aussie17 - aussie17

MUST WATCH: Today's senate testimony of mother of Natalie Boyce who died after Moderna vaccine. Truly unbelievable account of what happened.. Everyone involved from government, employers and university forcing vax, fake media, hospital workers are liable for her death! https://t.co/WwFVdgsJaV

Video Transcript AI Summary
Deborah Hamilton, a single mother, shares the tragic story of her 21-year-old daughter, Natalie, who died after receiving the Moderna COVID vaccine. Natalie was a healthy and hardworking student who had the vaccine due to workplace and university requirements. She experienced adverse reactions, including fainting, fever, stomach pain, and vomiting. Despite seeking medical help, Natalie's condition worsened, and she was misdiagnosed multiple times. Eventually, she was diagnosed with serious heart failure and transferred to the hospital, where she passed away. Deborah questions the lack of communication, inadequate medical care, and the government's push for vaccines. She urges authorities to stop vaccine mandates and remove the Moderna vaccine from Australia.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. My name is Deborah Hamilton. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to talk today. I'm a single mother who raised my 2 children from the age of 1 and 3 by myself. Natalie my daughter died a brutal unnecessary death from a COVID vaccination and I'm here today to tell her story. Her passing has almost broken me and her brother Haydn. It should never have happened. I want to stop this senseless tragedy occurring ever again to any other Australian, particularly the young. Natalie is officially recognized by the TGA as the 14th Australian to lose their life to the COVID vaccine. Natalie had 2 Pfizer vaccinations in 2021 and then she had the lethal Moderna vaccine shot in February 22 at the Amcal Chemist in Rowville. I want you to be aware that I am not an anti vaxxer and I am pro vaccine. I myself have had 3 COVID vaccinations but would definitely not be having any more. Myself and both my children had all their regular childhood vaccinations and are not against vaccinations and have fully tested over many years. My healthy 21 year old daughter, Natalie Boyce, tragically died on my deceased mum's birth date on the 27th March 22. This is a picture of my daughter taken on New Year's Eve. Little did she or my family know that she would be deceased less than 3 months labour because of an evil vaccine that was forced upon us all. Nelly was a healthy 21 year old with her whole life ahead of her. She was a hardworking individual. She was working part time and also studying full time at Deakin University in Melbourne, a double degree in a Bachelor of Laws and Bachelor of Commerce. She was a hardworking student who loved her studies. She was passing with distinction and was excited for the life ahead. Natalie was strongly encouraged by her workplace to have the vaccine or otherwise, she would have to work from home. Feet or otherwise she would have to work from home. Deakin University also had the policy that for her to be able to study on campus, she must be fully vaccinated. The rules in Victoria we endured over lockdowns were so strict, she made the decision to have the vaccine so as not to feel isolated and any loneliness anymore and to be able to leave our home to attend, work and study. Children. Nelly reacted to the Moderna vaccine the very next day after having it. She fainted in her bedroom and remained in bed for the rest of the day. I called the COVID vaccine line for help, yet they were totally useless and their response was to call an ambulance if I thought I needed 1. You would have to question what the point of the government department was for when they could not assist. Was it just a waste of government funds? My daughter continued to be unwell with a fever, stomach pain and vomiting. So we attended her local children GP, Wellness on Wellington in Rowville, who misdiagnosed her as having reflux and prescribed reflux medication and requested blood tests. The GB was advised at the appointment that Natalie had just had the Moderna vaccine and had not been well since having it. The GP did not order any tests for myocarditis. This same GP practice Wellness Wellington in Rayville on the 24th February this year, nearly a year to the date of her death. Incensivatively sent me a text to to get my booster on the 24th February. Money is obviously more important to them than people's lives. This text caused me severe emotional stress. Children. That night after visiting the GP, Natalie was in a lot of pain. I knew she wasn't right, so I took her to the local public hospital, children, the Anglers Hospital in Ferntree Gully. I was not allowed into the hospital because of government COVID regulations. No visitors were allowed, so I had to go home and wait. I was unable to advocate for her and to speak up for her. She was left sitting in the waiting room for hours until being seen. They too misdiagnosed her with reflux and sent her home. I question why I followed all the government rules and mandates and was triple vaccinated myself, but I was still not allowed to be present with my daughter when she needed me the most. What was the point of being vaccinated when I was still banned from supporting my child in hospital? Janelle did not improve so I took her to Monash Hospital a week later. This was the biggest mistake of my life. This major Victorian public hospital was an absolute shambles. I went to the triage counter and gave Natalie's details childs and advised them that she had Antiphospholipid Syndrome and had not been well since the Moderna vaccine. The nurse did not know what APS was, so I had to spell it out for her to write it on the admission form. Then once again, I was sent away and not allowed to be with her even though I was triple vaccinated. All the other parents were patients, sorry, were allowed a support person except my daughter. I have text messages still in my phone from her pleading for me to come and be with her as everyone else was was allowed someone with them. This still haunts me today and probably will for the rest of my life. I desperately tried to enter the hospital to support and advocate for her but they refused to let me in. What was the point of being vaccinated? All they did was give me a piece of paper with 3 phone numbers on it and advised me to call them. I tried to call the numbers but the phone either rang out or was engaged. I wanted to get her out of Monash Hospital and take her to a private hospital to get the care that she deserved. Monash Hospital, left her sitting in a chair for 8 hours with a drip in her arm and a full vomit bag. She was humiliated and as it turns out in serious heart failure yet she was ignored by staff. They, too, misdiagnosed her and sent her home after about 16 hours. Doctors remarked that they were seeing a lot of these reactions after vaccinations, COVID vaccinations, that is, especially a messy looking liver on an ultrasound. Still, they did nothing for her. They failed to investigate her heart despite by all the signs and sent her home with a report saying she looked well and to follow-up with a GP in a week. Then 36 hours later, Natalie was in extreme pain and was having trouble breathing. I called triple o and I can't believe how I was treated by the Etzer call operator. I told her that my daughter had Antiphospholipid syndrome, which is a blood clotting condition and that I thought she had blood clots on the lungs. The operator dismissed me and refused to mark the call as a code one and to suspend an ambulance immediately as Natalie was still conscious. The EDSA call operator said she was not sending an ambulance but would get a paramedic to call me back within half an hour, and then they would decide if they would send an ambulance or not. I told the operator that I did not have half an hour to wait. I knew she was in trouble. I then made the decision to drive her to Mulgrave private hospital. On arrival at Mulgrave Private Hospital, even though Natalie was triple vaccinated as well by this stage, she was going in and out of consciousness, but we still had to follow COVID protocols again and wait 15 minutes for a negative COVID test until she be seen by any medical person. When she was seen by the emergency doctor, she was diagnosed straight away as in serious heart failure. So they made arrangements for her to be transferred to the Alfred Hospital to receive more intensive care. Ambulance Victoria then sent a doctor to straight away to care for her. It was a bit late when they should have come in the 1st place to my house. At about 2 children. The Sunday morning, she was finally transported from Mulgrave Private to the Alfred. This was about 10 hours after we arrived at Mulgrave as they had to run tests and get her stable and ready for transport. Mulgrave Private allowed me to be in the emergency department the whole time and to be present with Natalie once they had her stable. If the ETSA call operator had sent an ambulance to my house, she would have been at the Alfred 10 hours earlier and the AV children, would not have had to be with her all the time. What a complete waste, again, of government from funds from errors. The AV doctor told me not to follow the ambulance as I was going to drive fast, but to meet them at the emergency department. She was sent in an adult retrieval ambulance to the Alfred. I was also disgusted that the highest ambulance in Victoria did not have the necessary equipment to transport transport her. The ambulance Victoria doctor had to get approval to borrow the breathing equipment from Mulgrave private hospital for the transfer transfer. How can they not have the right equipment when they're the highest ambulance in Victoria? This needs to be fixed for the future. I arrived at the Alfreda around 2:30 AM and again was not allowed in to be with Natalie and told to go home even though I was triple vaccinated. I was so distressed. Me being vaccinated again meant nothing. I was a mess and had to drive home for about 40 minutes. To this day, I do not know how I got home with the state I was in. I sent 2 complaints to Daniel Andrews about this saying that the ambulance system must be fixed. He never bothered to respond. My niece and her boyfriend have both studied paramedicine, yet they're both unable to get jobs. If the system is so broken, why these new graduates not obtaining positions. If we have vaccinations to help the health system, why is the ambulance system still under so much pressure? The government the government needs to put more funding into the ambulance system and stop spending on advertising to get your booster. If there are no jobs for them on completion of these for these of the completion of their degrees for these students after studying, children. Why are the university places being offered? My daughter Natalie Boyce spent 3 weeks in the ICU at the Alfred Hospital unconscious and in that time, her heart and body gradually collapsed all because of the Moderna vaccine. Her heart and kidneys were failing. Her foot went black from a blood clot and she lost feeling in her leg. She couldn't breathe on her own as put on the highest form of life support, the ECMO machine, which resulted in spinal cord damage. If she had have survived, Natalie most likely would never have walked children again. This is the photo of my daughter in OCU as a result from the Moderna vaccine. All of this was caused by COVID vaccine and medical negligence of public hospitals and doctors. After her horrific ordeal, Natalie finally passed while having an MRI on the 27th March 22, just 5 weeks after her Moderna booster. Her death certificate states that she died of myocardial infarction and that she had subacute myocarditis. The TGA released a statement in September 2022 stating that Natalie's death was likely related to the Moderna vaccine. Ironically, 2 days after her death, I caught COVID, even though I was triple vaxxed. Vaccination did not stop transmission as advertised by medical professionals and governments. During Natalie's time in the Alfred, the 1st week, I was only allowed to visit for 1 hour for 3 days a week. The next 2 weeks, the rules changed. And I was granted 1 whole hour a day to visit my extremely sick daughter. This rule was so cruelly inhumane. My daughter was dying, yet I could only visit her for an hour every other day. I was her mother, triple vaccinated with zero rights. However, the rules were different for the premier of Victoria while he was in the Alfred. An Elfrid nurse told me that Daniel Andrews was allowed visitors whenever he wanted with no time limits. My daughter was critically ill and I was stopped from being there for her. Yet the Victorian premier could always have visitors as long as he liked. Why do some politicians not follow the rules that they enforce on others? Communication was appalling from all the hospitals. This caused incredible stress, not knowing what was going on and not being able to visit Natalie. I was told during my 1 hour visit children. She'd been resuscitated on several occasions, yet not 1 medical professional had bothered to call and let me know. Another time I arrived to find out that they'd put Natalie on dialysis, yet nobody from The Alfred rang me to tell me about this either. It was distressing and shocking to arrive to see more machines attached to my daughter. The Victorian coroner's office head office has advised that they are sick of Natalie's case and all the calls and attention that they receive about it. They will not answer my question on whether it will be a coronaial inquest or not. They said it will only be an inquest if it is in the public's interest. How can a vaccine death not be in the public's interest? Is this another government cover up? I was told in December 2022 not to expect a coroner's report in 2023, so not within 2 years either as nothing happens quick in the coroner's office. My request to have her samples preserved has also gone unanswered. I've also since discovered that there were warnings of the dangers of the vaccine in November 2021 for people with immune compromised conditions. If I had known this very real risk, Natalie would never have had another vaccine and I believe she would still be alive today. We made the fatal mistake of relying on mainstream media. Why was this medical warning not published and communicated to doctors and the public? And why is the community still being kept in the dark about the risk to the immune compromise? Where is the informed consent. I do not understand how politicians, government and mainstream media can still be pushing people to have COVID vaccines without long term fence without long term safety data. People have a right to make an informed decision. All of you know that my daughter died from Moderna, yet the government is still going ahead with a manufacturing plant in Victoria. How can this be justified? Is money and big pharmaceuticals more important than people's lives. Who will be held accountable for the deaths and injuries that will occur from this Moderna vaccine? Children. The World Health Organisation published last month that healthy children and adolescents no longer need to have the COVID vaccine. The TGA has only recognized 14 deaths of the 9 85 reported deaths as vaccine related, with Natalie's being children, the last one recognized. Why are so many of them not being acknowledged? Is the TGA really an independent body when it is a government department also. The government is building this Moderna production facility in Victoria. Surely, this is a major conflict of interest. Who will be held accountable for any deaths and injuries occurring for Moderna vaccines that the government has backed? Money means more to the government than people. There are so many victims injured by these COVID vaccines. I suggest that you go and look on the internet for sites that report adverse reactions in considering this bill. Some samples to look at are Jab Injuries Australia on Instagram, Coverse, React 19, Real Not Rare, no more silence, au.com, how bad is my batch. These are honest true stories that the most mainstream media, for some reason and not reporting. I've been contacted personally for many of these victims and their stare stories are so harrowing too. The vaccine compensation scheme is an absolute fiasco and most of the injured people can't access it. The processing times are ridiculous and their most claims are rejected anyway. I would like to know what price do you put on a human life. It is disgraceful the compensation compensation that you offer people for the long term suffering. There is definitely no price for a human life. It's also very interesting to note that once I put my claim in, in March 2023, after my meeting with the TGA, the scheme details and definitions for tier 3 were changed. How can you have a scheme that you update once a claim is lodged? All individuals should have a right to choose what vaccines and medications they put into their own bodies. The government politicians, fair work commission, etcetera, should never have the power to mandate vaccines and threaten people of being sacked and destitute. Yet 3 years on vaccine mandates remain in place at most universities and for countless jobs impacting millions of Australians. No workplace ever should have the right to decide what vaccination an employee must take to be able to work. Will the employer be prepared to take the full legal responsibility and compensation if an injury or death occurs? Children. Any of you that are here today that will that still push for compulsory vaccinations will be responsible for innocent people's innocent people's deaths and injuries. I hold those pushing vaccines accountable for the death of my healthy daughter, Natalie Boyce. Moderna needs to be pulled from Australia immediately, so no other person should die from it. No parent should ever have their child die before them, children, especially at such a young age. She was healthy with her whole life ahead of her. This deadly COVID theme, ATSA and incompetence of the hospitals and doctors took that away from her and my family. As for me personally, Natalie's death has destroyed my life and severely impacted her brother Hayden's and the rest of my family's life. Hayden never expected to be an only child at the age of 23. I'm a single mother who brought up Natalie and Hayden on my own from the time they were babies. We're a tight loving unit that is now shattered. I hold those pushing facts, those people pushing vaccines accountable for Natalie's death. Natalie had a wicked sense of humor and would always say to me, you better be nice to me as I will be choosing your nursing home. I wish so much as she would have had would have had that chance to do this. Instead, I had to arrange my daughter's funeral at the age of 21 and now I have her ashes with me at home. Stop compulsory vaccinate questions now before more deaths and injuries occur. Remove Moderna from Australia now, like many other countries such as Germany, France, Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Iceland have for the under 30 year olds. An employer has no right to force COVID vaccination for an employee to remain employed. I ask you all today, are you able to live with the fact you know the COVID vaccine is causing deaths and injuries, yet you continue to support mandates. Would your view be different if your child was deceased and not my daughter? Un government policies meant to save lives and not to destroy them. Stop COVID vaccines now to stop this carnage. My daughter would be alive today if she'd not taken that Moderna vaccine. Natalie is not a statistic. She was my only daughter and she'll be living her life still. I beg of you, do not let this tragedy happen again. The fate of innocent Australians is in your hands. Natalie's Boyce Natalie Boyce's life did matter. Thank you for allowing me to tell my family's story today.
_aussie17
Posted - December 15, 2023 at 11:08 PM
Saved - December 16, 2023 at 6:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Austrian TV station discusses DNA plasmid contamination in vaccines. Independent labs found plasmid residues in higher concentrations than specified. Authorities remain silent and mainstream media doesn't cover the issue. German TV also reports DNA contamination in Pfizer's mRNA vaccine. Concerns raised about the potential risks of foreign DNA in vaccines. Some scientists believe it could cause genetic damage, while others deem it unlikely. Authorities rely on manufacturers' test protocols and do not independently test for DNA contamination. The debate continues, with conflicting analysis results and skepticism from authorities.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Whoops! Austrian TV station ServusTV "Talk im Hanger-7" talks about DNA plasmid contamination. (Dec 14 2023) Pro government medical journalist looked uncomfortable during the segment. "...before you If you ever say that you are calling on people to get vaccinated again, you should think carefully look at what you have learned in the last few years. And you learned, for example, back in February, this year it was published for the first time that the vaccine was contaminated is, namely with plasmid DNA. And that's not false information, but these are facts. There are independent laboratories have found plasmid residues in a much higher concentration than that specification provides. And you also have to say, you also have to question things, is that true? this specification, these famous 10 nanograms per dose, because it involves naked DNA. Here The DNA is just like the messenger RNA, it is packaged in the lipid nanoparticle, With that it also goes into the cell. And that's not even said. And I want that too because of my biotechnical experience as well as being an analyst, and I worked very, very closely also with the development, and the production, question whether this is actually the right one limit is. And the authorities are silent about it. It hasn't been tested either. Yes, that's the next thing one has to tell people.They sent the test certificate further. It was at best paper control. And the control labs have barely performed any analyses. Yes, they did four parameters, including clarity, color, content, but they didn't test for all the important things regarding contamination. And we've known that since February. There are now reports again, also from Germany, from Tuesday. And this is not being covered by mainstream media media. And there is where it needs to be reported, Before anyone thinks about further vaccination recommendations. So the famous PlasmidGate, as it is also called, yes, if you've heard of it. And that's not any, not just any idea that someone has, but this is real data from laboratories, repeatedly shown that we are there have a huge problem. And that was in the MDF the day before yesterday. And the authorities are silent. And this is a scandal, in my opinion. --------

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker raises concerns about the contamination of vaccines with plasmid DNA and questions the validity of the specified limit. They criticize the lack of testing and transparency by authorities and highlight reports of contamination in Germany. The speaker suggests that further investigation is needed to determine the potential negative effects of these contaminants. They emphasize the importance of clear communication, testing for adverse effects, and conducting prospective studies to assess any potential risks. The speaker also mentions that vaccines do not remain solely at the injection site but can reach various organs, including the liver, heart, and brain. They believe that people should be informed about these issues and the possible side effects.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ganz sicher nicht. Und bevor man überhaupt ausspricht, dass man wieder die Menschen aufruft, impfen zu gehen, sollte man mal gründlich hinsehen, was man jetzt auch in den letzten Jahren gelernt hat. Und man hat zum Beispiel gelernt, und zwar schon im Februar heuer wurde das das erste Mal publiziert, dass die der Impfstoff verunreinigt ist, nämlich mit Plasmit DNA. Und das ist kein kein keine falsche Information, wenn ich Sie jetzt ansehe, wie Sie die Stirn runzeln, sondern das sind Fakten. Es haben unabhängige Labors haben Plasmitrückstände gefunden, und zwar in einem viel höheren in einer viel höheren Konzentration, als dass die Spezifikation vorsieht. Und man muss noch dazusagen, man muss auch hinterfragen, stimmt überhaupt diese Spezifikation, diese berühmten zehn Nanogramm pro Dosis? Das ist Speaker 1: aber richtig gut. Speaker 0: Weil es ja auf nackte die DNA geht, hier ist die DNA genauso wie die Messenger RNA, sie ist verpackt in dem Lipid an Nanopartikel. Damit geht sie auch in die Zelle Und das ist gar nicht gesagt und ich ich möchte das auch aus aufgrund meiner biotechnischen Erfahrung als auch Analytikerin und ich war sehr, sehr eng gearbeitet auch mit der Entwicklung, mit der Produktion hinterfragen, ob das tatsächlich der richtige Grenzwert ist. Und die Behörden schweigen dazu, es wurde auch nicht getestet, ja? Das ist ja das Nächste, was man den Menschen sagen muss. Getestet hat der Hersteller, man hat das Prüfzertifikat dann weitergeschickt. Es wurde Papier bestenfalls kontrolliert und die Kontrolllabers haben kaum Analysen durchgeführt. Ja, die haben vier Parameter gemacht, unter anderem Klarheit, Farbe Content, also Gehalt. Und all die wichtigen Dinge auf Verunreinigung zu testen, das hat man nicht gemacht und man ist das seit Februar? Es gibt jetzt erneut wieder Berichte auch aus Deutschland von von Dienstag und das kommt überhaupt nicht in den Mainstream Medien an. Und dort muss es ankommen, bevor bitte doch irgendjemand nachdenkt über weitere Impfempfehlungen. Also das berühmte Plasmit Gate, wie's auch heißt, ja, wenn Sie's schon gehört haben. Und das ist kein keine irgendeine Idee, die irgendwer hat, sondern das sind reale Daten von Labors wiederholt gezeigt, dass wir da ein Riesenproblem haben Speaker 2: Und es war jetzt die Bewerbungstellung. Schweigen. Speaker 0: Und das ist ein Skandal, meiner Meinung nach Also das muss man dringend hinsehen. Speaker 1: Dass die Behörden nicht, was Sie sagen, ist ja alles richtig. Was die Behörden jetzt nicht gut reagieren, ist komplett inakzeptabel. Was man halt Auch Speaker 0: die Medien. Die Medien haben ein bisschen das Speaker 1: eine Relativierung hier sagen möchte. Also diese zehn Pickogramm, Da das sind ist die Empfehlung der WHO. Ja. Aber die Spezifikation im Impfstoff gibt es nicht, dass dort eben nur diese zehn Speaker 0: sollte gern. Das waren immer das Klein erzählen. Speaker 1: Genau. Das ist das, was die WHO empfiehlt und das, was so in der europäischen Pharmokopäer drinsteht für auch andere Impfstoffe, zum Beispiel Hepatitis a, Chicken Pooks, für Tollwut Impfstoffe, auch für Influenza, das sind diese zehn diese zehn Einheiten. Ob das bei dem Coronaimpfstoff auch so drinsteht, weiß ich nicht. Speaker 0: Da steht drinnen. Ich hab da die Chargen angesehen. Das steht drinnen sowohl bei den Es gibt ja Prozess eins, Prozess zwei Genau. Diese Spezifikation, das wird dir gezeigt in der Abreicherung. Das ist dir dann kein Routinetestparameter mehr zwingen, sondern ich muss das validieren, ich muss das zeigen. Speaker 1: Und wir müssen kurz Speaker 2: im Namen des Buches einschreiten. Wir kommen da alle nicht mehr mit, wenn Sie dieses Fachgespräch Speaker 0: ist eine Verunreinigung und der Prozess definiert mir das Produkt. Das ist ganz, ganz wichtig bei biotechnischen Verfahren. Das heißt, wie ich probtiere Das heißt, was Speaker 2: Sie sagen, ist nicht nur in in in meine und in die Sprache des Publikums übersetzt. Was Sie sagen, ist, Dass in diesen Impfstoffen Verunreinuhren gefunden wurden, von denen noch nicht klar ist, welche negativen Folgen sie haben. Genau. Ob sie auch Kardiogen sind oder Oh, ja. Speaker 0: Und ob man's überhaupt vom von der Konzentration her richtig erfasst, denn es handelt sich nicht nackte DNA, sondern die ist, wie gesagt, eben in dieses Vehikel verpackt, wie auch die Messenger RNA. Speaker 1: Ja. Speaker 0: Und damit kann ich sie gar nicht so mit diesen Testmethoden, die man Speaker 2: bei so einem Zweifel müsste so ein Medikament vom Markt genommen werden. Das sagen Sie ja damit, oder? Ja, also im Endeffekt wird man Speaker 0: das Zweifel und untersucht werden wir uns nicht Speaker 2: beworben werden. Speaker 0: Und zwar sofort. Und das wissen wir seit Februar. Im Februar kamen bereits die ersten Daten. Speaker 1: Das müssten drei Speaker 0: Dinge Niemand. Was macht Speaker 1: aus meinem Blick wegen. Das Erste ist, man müsste da sauber kommunizieren. Die Zulassungsbehörden müssten jetzt sagen, wir haben die und die Grenzwerte, die wurden überschritten oder nicht überschritten. Das müsst die jetzt mal machen. Das Zweite, was notwendig wäre, ist, man müsste testen, ob diese Mengen tatsächlich in sequenziellen Tierversuchen eine unkogene Wirkung haben auf die Stammzellen, das würde jetzt das zweite Schritt sein. Und das Dritte würde sein, Ja. Dass man jetzt, es würden ja in Deutschland jetzt fünfundsechzig Millionen Menschen geimpft, weltweit waren das viele Milliarden. Man müsste jetzt prospektive Studien ansetzen, zu unterscheiden zwischen Geimpften und Nicht Geimpften und dann zu sehen, gibt es irgendwelche Krebs Krebsrisiken, die dann tatsächlich bei den Menschen ankommen? Denn so ehrlich muss man sein, Diese zehn Einheiten, die man da empfiehlt von der WHO, die kommen ja aus anderen Impfstoffen und auch anderen Medikamenten. Da geht man davon aus zum Beispiel, dass bei der Influenzaimpfschrift zwischen vier Komma sieben mal zehn hoch minus sieben bis zehn hoch minus fünfzehn, die wahrscheinlich zehn noch minus fünfzehn, wissen Sie, wie null da sind. Die Wahrscheinlichkeit ist, dass ein Krebsfall auftritt oder eine Infektion. Also die die Die Wahrscheinlichkeit ist unheimlich gering und diese Basenpaare, das sollen ja immer zweihundert sein, die sind frakturiert. Es gibt 'n enthematischen Abbau. Also die Sicherheitsgrenze, die die WHO hier setzt, ist extrem hoch. Also es gibt 'n theoretisches Risiko, die das kann man nicht ausschließen. Das muss sauber kommuniziert werden. Es muss untersucht werden und es muss in 'ner prospektive Studie auch Speaker 2: bei Ihnen. Was Sie, der Vorwurf, den Sie haben, ist, dass das nicht gemacht wird, sondern dass es verschwiegen wird, korrekt? Speaker 0: Es wird verschwiegen und dass man, ich möchte noch einen weiteren Punkt nennen, ja? Also mein Punkt ist, und ich halte niemanden vom Impfen ab, ja? Menschen mögen das für sich. Sie kennen Ihren Körper, Sie sollen das tun, was Sie für richtig halten. Aber man muss den Menschen sagen, Achtung, das sind Verunreinigungen. Und das Zweite ist ja, es sei auch eine aufgeklärt gehört, dass der Impfstoff nicht an der Einstiegsstelle bleibt, sondern und ich hab noch einmal jetzt da jetzt dieser Tage nachgesehen, was denn die EMA, die Europäische Arzneimittelbehörde auf ihrer Homepage schreibt. Und sie sagt ganz konkret, also Sie verweist nur auf Tierstudien und sagt, der Impfstoff verbleibt, also bleibt an der Einstichstelle und geht auch in die Lymphknoten. Und zusätzlich bestätigen Sie auch, dass in diversen Organen auch kleine Mengen ankommen, ja? Das hat man den Menschen nie gesagt, und zwar in der Leber, im Herzen, im sogar im Gehirn, ja, in der Milz findet man kleine Mengen von von den Spike Proteinen. Und das hat man den Menschen doch nie gesagt und das finde sollten wir wissen. Bis hin zu den Nebenwirkungen. Auch darüber sollte gesprochen werden und die gibt es, diese Nebenwirkungen. Ich kann das selbst aus meiner eigenen Familie berichten.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

SOURCE https://www.servustv.com/aktuelles/v/aad1gzmf0bcrfq1r4z01/

Corona statt Christkind: Drohen wieder Zwangsmaßnahmen? servustv.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Typo "Talk on Hangar 7"

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Related

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨🚨 For the first time, German TV MDR covers DNA contamination in Pfizer's mRNA vaccine! ---------Transcript----------- We are in a private laboratory in Magdeburg. Professor Brigitte König is examining Corona vaccines here. The result, all samples are contaminated. "With foreign DNA that should not be in the vaccine in this quantity. From my point of view, the alarming result is that all 5 batches had significant foreign DNA in them, which are well above the limit. It's about the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine. 5 batches were given to the Magdeburg laboratory because there was a suspicion." Foreign DNA could be contained in the vaccine, and beyond the limit. According to WHO, the limit is a total DNA content of 10 nanograms per dose. It is important that this is not exceeded, because there is a risk that foreign DNA could penetrate human cells. Brigitte König is an external professor at the medical faculty of the University of Magdeburg. She shows us the result of her privately conducted investigation. All 5 examined batches are contaminated. For the lowest concentration, the limit was exceeded by 83 times. The highest concentration found was 354 times the limit to König. This is concerning. The client of the analysis is also a private individual. The biologist Dr. Jürgen Kirchner. He has been one of the vocal critics of mRNA vaccines for years. He operates a website called Gene Vaccines. There he also advertises his books written under a pseudonym. His last one is called "Sullied." He has also appeared on YouTubers like the controversial Corona critic Paul Brandenburg. And discussed with him his theses on vaccines. Also the findings from Magdeburg. When DNA contaminations are found in a vaccine, that are as far above the limits as we have found, then in my view a special paragraph of the Medicines Act automatically applies, that is paragraph 5. It says if a medicinal product is questionable, then it must be taken off the market. And the biologist tries to achieve this. In September, he was at a hearing in the Bundestag's Petitions Committee on the topic of pandemic planning. Here he used the opportunity to present the analysis results from Magdeburg. These are gigantic exceedances of a limit for a really very questionable medicinal product. But do the vaccines actually contain foreign DNA? The accusation is not new. Already in April 2023, American scientists found foreign DNA above the limit in the vaccines from BioNTech and Moderna. Also in this pre-publication of a Canadian study from the end of October, several scientists come to a similar conclusion. The researchers write, our results extend the existing concerns regarding vaccine safety. But are such traces of foreign DNA actually dangerous? Humans constantly carry foreign DNA in themselves. This can come from food, but also if bacteria enter the lungs. These floating DNA snippets are digested in the gut by enzymes. But there is a difference with the mRNA vaccination. The vaccine contains so-called lipid nanoparticles. They smuggle the mRNA into the cells. They do not differentiate, however, whether they transport mRNA or DNA. Could foreign DNA thereby directly penetrate the cell nucleus? That is at least the concern of this American researcher, Prof. Dr. Philip Buckhaults. He is a clear proponent of mRNA technology. Yet he too says he found DNA residues in Pfizer vaccine. Here at a hearing in the South Carolina Senate, he explains the potential consequences of DNA. By email he writes us, at the moment no one knows for sure, whether the foreign DNA has caused damage or will cause damage. But there is clearly a justified theoretical risk of genetic damage to long-lived stem cells. We asked several renowned German scientists about this concern. Only a few reply to our request. Among them is Prof. Emanuel Wyler from the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, an institute funded by the federal government. He deems it extremely unlikely that the DNA could have negative consequences. Further, he writes, DNA in vaccines is not a new topic and is also tested for, for example, in a flu vaccine. Until now, no one has been interested, or one rightly trusts that the Paul Ehrlich Institute as the responsible authority performs the testing work correctly. In my opinion, this shows that this is not about DNA in vaccines, but either about fundamentally questioning vaccinations, our best weapon against infectious diseases, or about creating a sensation with the issue of Corona. However, Prof. Gerald Dyker, a chemist at the Ruhr University, does think that negative consequences are conceivable. He writes to us, against the background that one was under extreme time pressure, that the manufacturer decided, either without knowledge or with the acquiescence of supervisory authorities, to release the product with the remaining DNA impurities for mass vaccination. For Prof. Bernd Mühlbauer of the Drug Commission, however, it is still not clear at all, whether the vaccine is actually contaminated to a worrying extent. But he writes that residual amounts of DNA in the case of an mRNA vaccine cannot penetrate the cell nucleus and cause damage. Such experiments, including animal tests over several generations, are necessary and perhaps have already been conducted. And how do the authorities respond to the debate? The Paul Ehrlich Institute is responsible for the surveillance and safety of vaccines. We want to know, whether they themselves have tested the vaccines for foreign DNA or at least checked the results from Magdeburg. The written response is that parameters such as the residual DNA content in the vaccine are only experimentally tested by the manufacturer. The Institute thus does not test the vaccines themselves for DNA contamination but relies on the manufacturers' test protocols. The fact that the authority neither tests itself nor checks the analysis results from Magdeburg causes surprise to Professor Brigitte König. "I would have expected, or assumed, that the authorities would at least randomly check the end product for contamination and purity. Depending on the product, or if something else is inside. As I said, the authorities can do that. Especially the Paul Ehrlich Institute has the equipment for it." The competent Federal Ministry of Health questions the analysis from Magdeburg and points out that some of the tested batches were already expired, according to Dr. Kirchner's notification. However, for the found foreign DNA this is irrelevant, says the scientist. The DNA in these lipid particles does not multiply. And is more likely to be decomposed. That is, if the vaccine is not expired, we might expect even higher values but not lower ones. The DNA does not multiply in a sterile vaccine. Since the authorities apparently doubt the investigation results from Magdeburg, we want to have various batches tested ourselves. We contacted more than 20 laboratories, some of them at German universities, but also private providers who can conduct such analyses. From all, we received rejections or no response. So, we failed to have a DNA analysis conducted independently once again. It would indeed be important to conclusively clarify the question of the DNA content. Because one reason for suspected DNA contamination could be the manufacturing process itself, which is different from the one used during the authorization study. The vaccine used for the clinical studies was manufactured mechanically without the involvement of microorganisms. This production path is named Process 1 in the documents of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Pfizer then switched to a different production technique, referred to as Process 2. Only very few subjects in the authorization study received this vaccine. Here, the material was supplied by genetically modified bacteria. This process was apparently less complex. But did it actually pose a higher risk? That there were differences between the batches of the two different manufacturing processes has been a concern. Questions about comparability, characterization, and clinical suitability were raised. We ask BioNTech why the manufacturing process was changed nonetheless, but we do not receive an answer to this question. Regarding the suspected DNA contamination identified by the Magdeburg scientist, the company writes that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is not contaminated with DNA. Furthermore, it states that the batches were subjected to comprehensive quality control by the manufacturer. The Magdeburg scientist says that she has now examined additional vaccine batches. Here too, she found foreign DNA. However, we as an editorial team were not able to conclusively answer whether this analysis is indeed accurate and, most importantly, whether the suspected DNA contamination can cause harm. The most recent act in the debate is this official-looking letter from an association called Medical Treatment Association, which warns doctors about the vaccine. However, as informed by the responsible authorities, this is said to be a false report. ----------------------------------- H/T: @Aquarius3_0

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a private laboratory in Magdeburg, Professor Brigitte König investigates COVID-19 vaccines and finds that all samples are contaminated with foreign DNA, exceeding the permissible limit. The vaccines in question are from BioNTech Pfizer, and five batches were sent to the Magdeburg lab due to suspicions of DNA contamination. While the presence of foreign DNA in the human body is common, concerns arise when it enters human cells. Some scientists argue that the lipid nanoparticles in mRNA vaccines could transport foreign DNA into the cell nucleus, potentially causing genetic damage. However, other experts believe the risk is minimal. The Paul Ehrlich Institute, responsible for vaccine safety, relies on manufacturers' test protocols and has not independently tested for DNA contamination. The debate continues, with conflicting opinions on the potential dangers of foreign DNA in vaccines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wir sind in einem Privatlabor in Magdeburg. Professorin Brigitte König untersucht hier Coronaimpfstoffe. Das Ergebnis, alle Proben sind verunreinigt mit Fremd DNA, die in dieser Menge nicht in den Impfstoff gehört. Speaker 1: Aus meiner Sicht ist das alarmierendes Ergebnis, Dass alle fünf Chargen erhebliche Fremd DNA inne hatten, drinnen hatten, die weit über dem Grenzwert Liegen. Speaker 0: Es geht den Impfstoff von BioNTech Pfizer. Fünf Chargen wurden in das Magdeburger Labor gegeben, weil es einen Verdacht gab, Fremd DNA könnte im Impfstoff enthalten sein, und zwar über dem Grenzwert. Der liegt laut WHO Ober bei einem DNA Gesamtgehalt von zehn Nanogramm pro Dosis. Es sei wichtig, dass dieser nicht überschritten werde, so König, weil die Gefahr bestünde, dass die Fremd DNA in die Zellen des Menschen eindränge. Brigitte der König ist externe Professorin an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität Magdeburg. Sie zeigt uns das Ergebnis ihrer privat durchgeführten Untersuchung. Alle fünf untersuchten Chargen seien verunreinigt. Bei der niedrigsten Konzentration wurde der Grenzwert das Dreiundachtzigfache übertroffen. Die höchste gefundene Konzentration betrug das Dreihundertvierundfünfzigfache vom Grenzwert zu König. Dies sei besorgniserregend. Auch der Auftraggeber der Analyse ist eine Privatperson, der studierte Biologe Doktor Jürgen Kirchner. Er gehört seit Jahren zu den lautstarken Kritikern der mRNA Impfstoffe. So betreibt her eine Webseite mit dem Namen Genimpfstoffe. Dort bewirbt er auch seiner unter einem Pseudonym geschriebenen Bücher. Sein Letztes heißt beschmutzt. Er war auch bei Youtubern wie dem umstrittenen Coronakritiker Paul Brandenburg zu Gast Speaker 2: Stoff gefunden werden, der so weit, wie wir es gefunden haben, über den Grenzwerten liegt, dann greift aus meiner Sicht Automatisch ein spezieller Paragraf des Arzneimittelgesetzes, das Paragraf fünf, der sagt, wenn ein Arzneimittel bedenklich ist, Dann muss es vom Markt genommen werden. Speaker 0: Und das versucht der Biologe auch zu erreichen. Im September war er bei einer Anhörung im zum Ausschuss des Bundestages zum Thema Pandemieplan. Hier nutzte er die Chance, die Analyseergebnisse aus Magdeburg vorzutragen. Speaker 2: Das sind gigantische Überschreitungen von einem Grenzwert für ein wirklich sehr bedenkliches Arzneimittel. Speaker 0: Doch enthalten die Impfstoffe tatsächlich Fremd DNA? Der Vorwurf ist nicht neu. Schon im April zweitausenddreiundzwanzig fanden amerikanische Wissenschaftler Fremd DNA über dem Grenzwert in den Impfstoffen von BioNTech und Moderna. Auch bei dieser Vorabveröffentlichung einer kanadischen Studie von Ende Oktober kommen mehrere Wissenschaftler lag zu einem ähnlichen Ergebnis. Die Forscher schreiben, unsere Ergebnisse erweitern die bestehenden Bedenken hinsichtlich der Impfstoffsicherheit. Doch sind solche Reste fremder DNA überhaupt gefährlich? Der Mensch trägt ständig Fremd DNA in sich. Die kann über die Nahrung kommen, aber auch wenn Bakterien in die Lunge gelangen. Diese frei schwebenden DNA Schnipsel werden im Darm von Enzymen dauert. Doch bei der mRNA Impfung gibt es einen Unterschied. Der Impfstoff enthält sogenannte Lipid Nanopartikel. Sie schleusen die mRNA in die Zellen. Sie unterscheiden jedoch nicht, ob sie mRNA a- oder eben DNA transportieren. Könnte die Fremd DNA dadurch direkt in den Zellkern gelangen? Das ist zumindest die Befürchtung dieses amerikanischen Forschers, Professor Doktor Philipp Backhauls. Er ist ein klarer Befürworter der mRNA Technologie, doch auch er sagt, er habe DNA Reste in Pfizer Impfstoff gefunden. Hier bei einer Anhörung im Senat von South Carolina, erklärt er mögliche Folgen der DNA. Per Mail schreibt er uns, im Moment weiß niemand mit Sicherheit, ob die Fremd DNA Schäden verursacht hat oder verursachen wird, aber es besteht ganz klar ein begründetes theoretisches Risiko genetischer sikogenetischer Schäden an langlebigen Stammzellen. Wir befragen mehrere namhafte deutsche Wissenschaftler zu dieser Befürchtung. Nur wenige beantworten unsere Anfrage. Darunter Professor Emmanuel Wieler vom Max Delbrück Center für Molekulare Medizin, Scene, ein von der Bundesregierung finanziertes Institut. Er hält es für extrem unwahrscheinlich, dass die DNA negative die wir Folgen haben könnte. Weiter schreibt er, DNA in Impfstoffen ist kein neues Thema und wird beispielsweise bei einem Grippeimpfstoff auch getestet. Das hat bisher niemanden interessiert beziehungsweise man vertraut richtigerweise darauf, dass das Paul Ehrlich Institut als zuständige Behörde die Prüfarbeit korrekt erledigt. Meines Erachtens zeigt das, dass es hier nicht DNA in Impfstoffen geht, sondern entweder Impfungen, unsere beste Waffe gegen Sektionskrankheiten grundsätzlich in Zweifel zu ziehen oder Stimmung zu machen mit dem Thema Corona. Professor Gerald Dücker, Chemiker an der Ruhr Universität, hält hingegen negative Folgen für denkbar. Er schreibt uns, vor dem Hintergrund, dass man unter extremem Zeitdruck stand, ist es vorstellbar, dass der Hersteller entschied, entweder unter Nichtwissen oder Duldung von zu Behörden, das Produkt mit den verbliebenen DNA Verunreinigungen in die Massenverimpfung zu geben. Für Professor Bernd Mühlbauer von der Arzneimittelkommission hingegen sei allerdings noch gar nicht geklärt, ob der Impfstoff tatsächlich in bedenkenswertem Ausmaß verunreinigt ist. Er schreibt aber, es ist ein Versäumnis der Zulassungsbehörden der Öffentlichkeit nicht mitzuteilen, ob und durch welche Methoden der Hersteller nachweisen musste, dass Restmengen von DNA im konkreten Fall der mRNA eine A-Impfung, nicht in den Zellkern eindringen und zu Schäden führen können. Solche Experimente, unter anderem Tierversuche über mehrere Generationen, sind notwendig und vielleicht ja auch schon durchgeführt. Rationen sind notwendig und vielleicht ja auch schon durchgeführt. Und wie reagieren die Behörden auf die Debatte? Zuständig für die Überwachung und Sicherheit der Impfstoffe ist das Paul Ehrlich Institut. Wir wollen wissen, ob es die Impfstoffe selbst auf Fremd DNA untersucht oder zumindest die Ergebnisse aus Magdeburg überprüft hat. Schriftlich heißt es, Parameter wie der Rest DNA Gehalt im Impfstoff werden nur vom Hersteller experimentell geprüft. Das Institut stella experimentell geprüft. Das Institut testet die Impfstoffe also nicht selbst auf DNA Verunreinigungen, sondern verlässt sich auf die Prüfprotokolle der Hersteller. Dass die Behörde wieder selbst Protokolle der Hersteller. Dass die Behörde weder selbst testet noch die Analyseergebnisse aus Magdeburg überprüft, stößt bei Professorin Brigitte König auf Verwunderung. Speaker 1: Ich hätte erwartet oder hatte eigentlich auch, bin davon ausgegangen, dass die Behörden Stichprobenartig zumindest das Endprodukt überprüfen und auf ja Kontamination oder auf die Reinheit, Je nachdem nach dem Produkt, oh, das ist noch etwas anderes drinnen. Wie gesagt, die Behörden können das, also vor allen Dingen das Paul Ehrlich Institut hat die Die Ausstattung dazu. Speaker 0: Das zuständige Bundesgesundheitsministerium stellt uns gegenüber die Analyse aus Magdeburg infrage und weist darauf hin, teilweise seien die getesteten Chargen nach Mitteilung von Doktor Kirchner auch abgelaufen gewesen. Für die gefundene Fremd DNA sei dies aber irrelevant, so die Wissenschaftlerin. Speaker 1: Die DNA In diesen Lipidpartikeln vermehrt sich ja nicht, ja, und wird eher noch abgebaut. Das heißt also, wenn der Impfstoff nicht abgelaufen ist, können wir eventuell nur mit höheren Werten rechnen, Aber nicht mit geringeren. Also die DNA vermehrt sich ja nicht in einem sterilen Impfstoff. Speaker 0: Da die Behörden die Untersuchungsergebnisse aus Magdeburg offenbar anzweifeln, zweifeln, wollen wir selbst verschiedene Chargen testen lassen. Wir fragen mehr als zwanzig Labore an, teilweise bei deutschen Universitäten, aber auch bei privaten bieten, die solche Analysen durchführen können. Von allen bekommen wir Absagen oder keine Reaktion. Es gelingt uns also nicht, eine DNA Analyse nochmals unabhängig durchführen zu lassen. Dabei wäre es durchaus wichtig, die Frage nach dem DNA Gehalt abschließend zu klären, denn ein Grund für mutmaßliche DNA Verunreinigungen könnte der Herstellungsprozess selbst sein, der ein anderer ist als noch bei der Zulassungsstudie. Denn der für die klinischen Studien verwendete Impfstoff wurde maschinell ohne Beteiligung von Mikroorganismen hergestellt. Dieser Herstellungsweg wird in den Unterlagen sagen der europäischen Zulassungsbehörde EMA, Prozess eins genannt. Pfizer ist dann auf eine andere Produktionstechnik umgestiegen, Prozess zwei genannt. Nur sehr wenige Probanden in der Zulassungsstudie erhielten diesen Impfstoff. Hier wurde das Material von gentechnisch veränderten tiering geliefert. Dieser Prozess war offenbar weniger aufwendig. Barg er aber tatsächlich ein höheres Risiko? Im Prüfbericht der europäischen Zulassungsbehörde zum Pfizer Impfstoff heißt es, dass es zwischen den Chargen der beiden verschiedenen Herstellungsprozesse zu Unterschieden kam. Dabei wurden Bedenken hinsichtlich Vergleichbarkeit, Charakterisierung und klinischer Eignung erhoben. Wir wollen von BioNTech wissen, warum das Herstellungsverfahren dennoch verändert wurde. Eine Antwort auf diese Frage erhalten wir nicht. Bezüglich der von der Magdeburger Wissenschaftlerin festgestellten mutmaßlichen DNA Verunreinigung schreibt das Unternehmen, der Pfizer BioNTech Covid neunzehn Impfstoff ist nicht mit DNA verunreinigt. Weiter heißt es, die Chargen wurden einer umfassenden Qualitätskontrolle durch den Hersteller unterzogen. Die Magdaburger Wissenschaftlerin sagt, mittlerweile habe sie weitere Impfschärgen untersucht. Auch hier fand sie Fremd DNA. Ob diese Analyse tatsächlich zutrifft und vor allem ob die mutmaßliche DNA Belastung Schaden anrichten kann, diese Fragen konnten wir als Redaktion allerdings nicht abschließend beantworten. Bislang letzter Akt in der Debatte ist dieses offiziell aussehende Schreiben einer Vereinigung namens medizinischer Behandlungsverbund, der Ärzte vor dem Impfstoff warnt. Wie die zuständigen Behörden mitteilten, sei dies aber eine Falschmeldung.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Further write-up and emailable format here! https://www.aussie17.com/p/plasmidgate-continues-to-hit-the

PlasmidGate Continues to Hit the Airwaves: Servus TV's "Talk im Hangar-7" covers DNA Contamination!" Second TV station to cover PlasmidGate! aussie17.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Btw, the journalist looked really uncomfortable because the lady is a VP of German biotech/pharma and she knows what she’s talking about and he knows that too.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Lol… Community Notes “timy DNA fragments have no side effects” 😂 https://t.co/bV77SLB6dP

_aussie17
Posted - December 15, 2023 at 11:52 PM
Saved - December 16, 2023 at 7:09 AM

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Related https://t.co/4tZYDpiFn8

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨🚨 For the first time, German TV MDR covers DNA contamination in Pfizer's mRNA vaccine! ---------Transcript----------- We are in a private laboratory in Magdeburg. Professor Brigitte König is examining Corona vaccines here. The result, all samples are contaminated. "With foreign DNA that should not be in the vaccine in this quantity. From my point of view, the alarming result is that all 5 batches had significant foreign DNA in them, which are well above the limit. It's about the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine. 5 batches were given to the Magdeburg laboratory because there was a suspicion." Foreign DNA could be contained in the vaccine, and beyond the limit. According to WHO, the limit is a total DNA content of 10 nanograms per dose. It is important that this is not exceeded, because there is a risk that foreign DNA could penetrate human cells. Brigitte König is an external professor at the medical faculty of the University of Magdeburg. She shows us the result of her privately conducted investigation. All 5 examined batches are contaminated. For the lowest concentration, the limit was exceeded by 83 times. The highest concentration found was 354 times the limit to König. This is concerning. The client of the analysis is also a private individual. The biologist Dr. Jürgen Kirchner. He has been one of the vocal critics of mRNA vaccines for years. He operates a website called Gene Vaccines. There he also advertises his books written under a pseudonym. His last one is called "Sullied." He has also appeared on YouTubers like the controversial Corona critic Paul Brandenburg. And discussed with him his theses on vaccines. Also the findings from Magdeburg. When DNA contaminations are found in a vaccine, that are as far above the limits as we have found, then in my view a special paragraph of the Medicines Act automatically applies, that is paragraph 5. It says if a medicinal product is questionable, then it must be taken off the market. And the biologist tries to achieve this. In September, he was at a hearing in the Bundestag's Petitions Committee on the topic of pandemic planning. Here he used the opportunity to present the analysis results from Magdeburg. These are gigantic exceedances of a limit for a really very questionable medicinal product. But do the vaccines actually contain foreign DNA? The accusation is not new. Already in April 2023, American scientists found foreign DNA above the limit in the vaccines from BioNTech and Moderna. Also in this pre-publication of a Canadian study from the end of October, several scientists come to a similar conclusion. The researchers write, our results extend the existing concerns regarding vaccine safety. But are such traces of foreign DNA actually dangerous? Humans constantly carry foreign DNA in themselves. This can come from food, but also if bacteria enter the lungs. These floating DNA snippets are digested in the gut by enzymes. But there is a difference with the mRNA vaccination. The vaccine contains so-called lipid nanoparticles. They smuggle the mRNA into the cells. They do not differentiate, however, whether they transport mRNA or DNA. Could foreign DNA thereby directly penetrate the cell nucleus? That is at least the concern of this American researcher, Prof. Dr. Philip Buckhaults. He is a clear proponent of mRNA technology. Yet he too says he found DNA residues in Pfizer vaccine. Here at a hearing in the South Carolina Senate, he explains the potential consequences of DNA. By email he writes us, at the moment no one knows for sure, whether the foreign DNA has caused damage or will cause damage. But there is clearly a justified theoretical risk of genetic damage to long-lived stem cells. We asked several renowned German scientists about this concern. Only a few reply to our request. Among them is Prof. Emanuel Wyler from the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, an institute funded by the federal government. He deems it extremely unlikely that the DNA could have negative consequences. Further, he writes, DNA in vaccines is not a new topic and is also tested for, for example, in a flu vaccine. Until now, no one has been interested, or one rightly trusts that the Paul Ehrlich Institute as the responsible authority performs the testing work correctly. In my opinion, this shows that this is not about DNA in vaccines, but either about fundamentally questioning vaccinations, our best weapon against infectious diseases, or about creating a sensation with the issue of Corona. However, Prof. Gerald Dyker, a chemist at the Ruhr University, does think that negative consequences are conceivable. He writes to us, against the background that one was under extreme time pressure, that the manufacturer decided, either without knowledge or with the acquiescence of supervisory authorities, to release the product with the remaining DNA impurities for mass vaccination. For Prof. Bernd Mühlbauer of the Drug Commission, however, it is still not clear at all, whether the vaccine is actually contaminated to a worrying extent. But he writes that residual amounts of DNA in the case of an mRNA vaccine cannot penetrate the cell nucleus and cause damage. Such experiments, including animal tests over several generations, are necessary and perhaps have already been conducted. And how do the authorities respond to the debate? The Paul Ehrlich Institute is responsible for the surveillance and safety of vaccines. We want to know, whether they themselves have tested the vaccines for foreign DNA or at least checked the results from Magdeburg. The written response is that parameters such as the residual DNA content in the vaccine are only experimentally tested by the manufacturer. The Institute thus does not test the vaccines themselves for DNA contamination but relies on the manufacturers' test protocols. The fact that the authority neither tests itself nor checks the analysis results from Magdeburg causes surprise to Professor Brigitte König. "I would have expected, or assumed, that the authorities would at least randomly check the end product for contamination and purity. Depending on the product, or if something else is inside. As I said, the authorities can do that. Especially the Paul Ehrlich Institute has the equipment for it." The competent Federal Ministry of Health questions the analysis from Magdeburg and points out that some of the tested batches were already expired, according to Dr. Kirchner's notification. However, for the found foreign DNA this is irrelevant, says the scientist. The DNA in these lipid particles does not multiply. And is more likely to be decomposed. That is, if the vaccine is not expired, we might expect even higher values but not lower ones. The DNA does not multiply in a sterile vaccine. Since the authorities apparently doubt the investigation results from Magdeburg, we want to have various batches tested ourselves. We contacted more than 20 laboratories, some of them at German universities, but also private providers who can conduct such analyses. From all, we received rejections or no response. So, we failed to have a DNA analysis conducted independently once again. It would indeed be important to conclusively clarify the question of the DNA content. Because one reason for suspected DNA contamination could be the manufacturing process itself, which is different from the one used during the authorization study. The vaccine used for the clinical studies was manufactured mechanically without the involvement of microorganisms. This production path is named Process 1 in the documents of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Pfizer then switched to a different production technique, referred to as Process 2. Only very few subjects in the authorization study received this vaccine. Here, the material was supplied by genetically modified bacteria. This process was apparently less complex. But did it actually pose a higher risk? That there were differences between the batches of the two different manufacturing processes has been a concern. Questions about comparability, characterization, and clinical suitability were raised. We ask BioNTech why the manufacturing process was changed nonetheless, but we do not receive an answer to this question. Regarding the suspected DNA contamination identified by the Magdeburg scientist, the company writes that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is not contaminated with DNA. Furthermore, it states that the batches were subjected to comprehensive quality control by the manufacturer. The Magdeburg scientist says that she has now examined additional vaccine batches. Here too, she found foreign DNA. However, we as an editorial team were not able to conclusively answer whether this analysis is indeed accurate and, most importantly, whether the suspected DNA contamination can cause harm. The most recent act in the debate is this official-looking letter from an association called Medical Treatment Association, which warns doctors about the vaccine. However, as informed by the responsible authorities, this is said to be a false report. ----------------------------------- H/T: @Aquarius3_0

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a private laboratory in Magdeburg, Professor Brigitte König investigates COVID-19 vaccines and finds that all samples are contaminated with foreign DNA, exceeding the recommended limit. The vaccines in question are from BioNTech Pfizer, and five batches were sent to the laboratory due to suspicions of DNA contamination. The concern is that the foreign DNA could enter human cells and cause damage. However, the presence and potential risks of foreign DNA in vaccines are still debated among scientists. The Paul Ehrlich Institute, responsible for vaccine safety, relies on manufacturers' test protocols and does not conduct its own DNA analysis. The analysis results from Magdeburg are questioned by authorities, and attempts to independently test the vaccines are unsuccessful. The issue raises questions about the manufacturing process and the potential impact of DNA contamination.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wir sind in einem Privatlabor in Magdeburg. Professorin Brigitte König untersucht hier Coronaimpfstoffe. Das Ergebnis, alle Proben sind verunreinigt mit Fremd DNA, die in dieser Menge nicht in den Impfstoff gehört. Speaker 1: Aus meiner Sicht ist das alarmierendes Ergebnis, Dass alle fünf Chargen erhebliche Fremd DNA inne hatten, drinnen hatten, die weit über dem Grenzwert Liegen. Speaker 0: Es geht den Impfstoff von BioNTech Pfizer. Fünf Chargen wurden in das Magdeburger Labor gegeben, weil es einen Verdacht gab, Fremd DNA könnte im Impfstoff enthalten sein, und zwar über dem Grenzwert. Der liegt laut WHO Ober bei einem DNA Gesamtgehalt von zehn Nanogramm pro Dosis. Es sei wichtig, dass dieser nicht überschritten werde, so König, weil die Gefahr bestünde, dass die Fremd DNA in die Zellen des Menschen eindränge. Brigitte der König ist externe Professorin an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität Magdeburg. Sie zeigt uns das Ergebnis ihrer privat durchgeführten Untersuchung. Alle fünf untersuchten Chargen seien verunreinigt. Bei der niedrigsten Konzentration wurde der Grenzwert das Dreiundachtzigfache übertroffen. Die höchste gefundene Konzentration betrug das Dreihundertvierundfünfzigfache vom Grenzwert zu König. Dies sei besorgniserregend. Auch der Auftraggeber der Analyse ist eine Privatperson, der studierte Biologe Doktor Jürgen Kirchner. Er gehört seit Jahren zu den lautstarken Kritikern der mRNA Impfstoffe. So betreibt her eine Webseite mit dem Namen Genimpfstoffe. Dort bewirbt er auch seiner unter einem Pseudonym geschriebenen Bücher. Sein Letztes heißt beschmutzt. Er war auch bei Youtubern wie dem umstrittenen Coronakritiker Paul Brandenburg zu Gast Speaker 2: Stoff gefunden werden, der so weit, wie wir es gefunden haben, über den Grenzwerten liegt, dann greift aus meiner Sicht Automatisch ein spezieller Paragraf des Arzneimittelgesetzes, das Paragraf fünf, der sagt, wenn ein Arzneimittel bedenklich ist, Dann muss es vom Markt genommen werden. Speaker 0: Und das versucht der Biologe auch zu erreichen. Im September war er bei einer Anhörung im zum Ausschuss des Bundestages zum Thema Pandemieplan. Hier nutzte er die Chance, die Analyseergebnisse aus Magdeburg vorzutragen. Speaker 2: Das sind gigantische Überschreitungen von einem Grenzwert für ein wirklich sehr bedenkliches Arzneimittel. Speaker 0: Doch enthalten die Impfstoffe tatsächlich Fremd DNA? Der Vorwurf ist nicht neu. Schon im April zweitausenddreiundzwanzig fanden amerikanische Wissenschaftler Fremd DNA über dem Grenzwert in den Impfstoffen von BioNTech und Moderna. Auch bei dieser Vorabveröffentlichung einer kanadischen Studie von Ende Oktober kommen mehrere Wissenschaftler lag zu einem ähnlichen Ergebnis. Die Forscher schreiben, unsere Ergebnisse erweitern die bestehenden Bedenken hinsichtlich der Impfstoffsicherheit. Doch sind solche Reste fremder DNA überhaupt gefährlich? Der Mensch trägt ständig Fremd DNA in sich. Die kann über die Nahrung kommen, aber auch wenn Bakterien in die Lunge gelangen. Diese frei schwebenden DNA Schnipsel werden im Darm von Enzymen dauert. Doch bei der mRNA Impfung gibt es einen Unterschied. Der Impfstoff enthält sogenannte Lipid Nanopartikel. Sie schleusen die mRNA in die Zellen. Sie unterscheiden jedoch nicht, ob sie mRNA a- oder eben DNA transportieren. Könnte die Fremd DNA dadurch direkt in den Zellkern gelangen? Das ist zumindest die Befürchtung dieses amerikanischen Forschers, Professor Doktor Philipp Backhauls. Er ist ein klarer Befürworter der mRNA Technologie, doch auch er sagt, er habe DNA Reste in Pfizer Impfstoff gefunden. Hier bei einer Anhörung im Senat von South Carolina, erklärt er mögliche Folgen der DNA. Per Mail schreibt er uns, im Moment weiß niemand mit Sicherheit, ob die Fremd DNA Schäden verursacht hat oder verursachen wird, aber es besteht ganz klar ein begründetes theoretisches Risiko genetischer sikogenetischer Schäden an langlebigen Stammzellen. Wir befragen mehrere namhafte deutsche Wissenschaftler zu dieser Befürchtung. Nur wenige beantworten unsere Anfrage. Darunter Professor Emmanuel Wieler vom Max Delbrück Center für Molekulare Medizin, Scene, ein von der Bundesregierung finanziertes Institut. Er hält es für extrem unwahrscheinlich, dass die DNA negative die wir Folgen haben könnte. Weiter schreibt er, DNA in Impfstoffen ist kein neues Thema und wird beispielsweise bei einem Grippeimpfstoff auch getestet. Das hat bisher niemanden interessiert beziehungsweise man vertraut richtigerweise darauf, dass das Paul Ehrlich Institut als zuständige Behörde die Prüfarbeit korrekt erledigt. Meines Erachtens zeigt das, dass es hier nicht DNA in Impfstoffen geht, sondern entweder Impfungen, unsere beste Waffe gegen Sektionskrankheiten grundsätzlich in Zweifel zu ziehen oder Stimmung zu machen mit dem Thema Corona. Professor Gerald Dücker, Chemiker an der Ruhr Universität, hält hingegen negative Folgen für denkbar. Er schreibt uns, vor dem Hintergrund, dass man unter extremem Zeitdruck stand, ist es vorstellbar, dass der Hersteller entschied, entweder unter Nichtwissen oder Duldung von zu Behörden, das Produkt mit den verbliebenen DNA Verunreinigungen in die Massenverimpfung zu geben. Für Professor Bernd Mühlbauer von der Arzneimittelkommission hingegen sei allerdings noch gar nicht geklärt, ob der Impfstoff tatsächlich in bedenkenswertem Ausmaß verunreinigt ist. Er schreibt aber, es ist ein Versäumnis der Zulassungsbehörden der Öffentlichkeit nicht mitzuteilen, ob und durch welche Methoden der Hersteller nachweisen musste, dass Restmengen von DNA im konkreten Fall der mRNA eine A-Impfung, nicht in den Zellkern eindringen und zu Schäden führen können. Solche Experimente, unter anderem Tierversuche über mehrere Generationen, sind notwendig und vielleicht ja auch schon durchgeführt. Rationen sind notwendig und vielleicht ja auch schon durchgeführt. Und wie reagieren die Behörden auf die Debatte? Zuständig für die Überwachung und Sicherheit der Impfstoffe ist das Paul Ehrlich Institut. Wir wollen wissen, ob es die Impfstoffe selbst auf Fremd DNA untersucht oder zumindest die Ergebnisse aus Magdeburg überprüft hat. Schriftlich heißt es, Parameter wie der Rest DNA Gehalt im Impfstoff werden nur vom Hersteller experimentell geprüft. Das Institut stella experimentell geprüft. Das Institut testet die Impfstoffe also nicht selbst auf DNA Verunreinigungen, sondern verlässt sich auf die Prüfprotokolle der Hersteller. Dass die Behörde wieder selbst Protokolle der Hersteller. Dass die Behörde weder selbst testet noch die Analyseergebnisse aus Magdeburg überprüft, stößt bei Professorin Brigitte König auf Verwunderung. Speaker 1: Ich hätte erwartet oder hatte eigentlich auch, bin davon ausgegangen, dass die Behörden Stichprobenartig zumindest das Endprodukt überprüfen und auf ja Kontamination oder auf die Reinheit, Je nachdem nach dem Produkt, oh, das ist noch etwas anderes drinnen. Wie gesagt, die Behörden können das, also vor allen Dingen das Paul Ehrlich Institut hat die Die Ausstattung dazu. Speaker 0: Das zuständige Bundesgesundheitsministerium stellt uns gegenüber die Analyse aus Magdeburg infrage und weist darauf hin, teilweise seien die getesteten Chargen nach Mitteilung von Doktor Kirchner auch abgelaufen gewesen. Für die gefundene Fremd DNA sei dies aber irrelevant, so die Wissenschaftlerin. Speaker 1: Die DNA In diesen Lipidpartikeln vermehrt sich ja nicht, ja, und wird eher noch abgebaut. Das heißt also, wenn der Impfstoff nicht abgelaufen ist, können wir eventuell nur mit höheren Werten rechnen, Aber nicht mit geringeren. Also die DNA vermehrt sich ja nicht in einem sterilen Impfstoff. Speaker 0: Da die Behörden die Untersuchungsergebnisse aus Magdeburg offenbar anzweifeln, zweifeln, wollen wir selbst verschiedene Chargen testen lassen. Wir fragen mehr als zwanzig Labore an, teilweise bei deutschen Universitäten, aber auch bei privaten bieten, die solche Analysen durchführen können. Von allen bekommen wir Absagen oder keine Reaktion. Es gelingt uns also nicht, eine DNA Analyse nochmals unabhängig durchführen zu lassen. Dabei wäre es durchaus wichtig, die Frage nach dem DNA Gehalt abschließend zu klären, denn ein Grund für mutmaßliche DNA Verunreinigungen könnte der Herstellungsprozess selbst sein, der ein anderer ist als noch bei der Zulassungsstudie. Denn der für die klinischen Studien verwendete Impfstoff wurde maschinell ohne Beteiligung von Mikroorganismen hergestellt. Dieser Herstellungsweg wird in den Unterlagen sagen der europäischen Zulassungsbehörde EMA, Prozess eins genannt. Pfizer ist dann auf eine andere Produktionstechnik umgestiegen, Prozess zwei genannt. Nur sehr wenige Probanden in der Zulassungsstudie erhielten diesen Impfstoff. Hier wurde das Material von gentechnisch veränderten tiering geliefert. Dieser Prozess war offenbar weniger aufwendig. Barg er aber tatsächlich ein höheres Risiko? Im Prüfbericht der europäischen Zulassungsbehörde zum Pfizer Impfstoff heißt es, dass es zwischen den Chargen der beiden verschiedenen Herstellungsprozesse zu Unterschieden kam. Dabei wurden Bedenken hinsichtlich Vergleichbarkeit, Charakterisierung und klinischer Eignung erhoben. Wir wollen von BioNTech wissen, warum das Herstellungsverfahren dennoch verändert wurde. Eine Antwort auf diese Frage erhalten wir nicht. Bezüglich der von der Magdeburger Wissenschaftlerin festgestellten mutmaßlichen DNA Verunreinigung schreibt das Unternehmen, der Pfizer BioNTech Covid neunzehn Impfstoff ist nicht mit DNA verunreinigt. Weiter heißt es, die Chargen wurden einer umfassenden Qualitätskontrolle durch den Hersteller unterzogen. Die Magdaburger Wissenschaftlerin sagt, mittlerweile habe sie weitere Impfschärgen untersucht. Auch hier fand sie Fremd DNA. Ob diese Analyse tatsächlich zutrifft und vor allem ob die mutmaßliche DNA Belastung Schaden anrichten kann, diese Fragen konnten wir als Redaktion allerdings nicht abschließend beantworten. Bislang letzter Akt in der Debatte ist dieses offiziell aussehende Schreiben einer Vereinigung namens medizinischer Behandlungsverbund, der Ärzte vor dem Impfstoff warnt. Wie die zuständigen Behörden mitteilten, sei dies aber eine Falschmeldung.
_aussie17
Posted - December 15, 2023 at 11:08 PM
Saved - December 16, 2023 at 7:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Austrian TV station discusses DNA plasmid contamination. Independent labs found higher plasmid concentrations than specified. Questions raised about the accuracy of the 10 nanograms per dose limit. Authorities remain silent and have not conducted thorough contamination tests. Mainstream media is not covering the issue. This is a scandalous problem that needs attention before further vaccination recommendations are made. #PlasmidGate #ContaminationScandal

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Whoops! Austrian TV station ServusTV "Talk im Hanger-7" talks about DNA plasmid contamination. (Dec 14 2023) Pro government medical journalist looked uncomfortable during the segment. "...before you If you ever say that you are calling on people to get vaccinated again, you should think carefully look at what you have learned in the last few years. And you learned, for example, back in February, this year it was published for the first time that the vaccine was contaminated is, namely with plasmid DNA. And that's not false information, but these are facts. There are independent laboratories have found plasmid residues in a much higher concentration than that specification provides. And you also have to say, you also have to question things, is that true? this specification, these famous 10 nanograms per dose, because it involves naked DNA. Here The DNA is just like the messenger RNA, it is packaged in the lipid nanoparticle, With that it also goes into the cell. And that's not even said. And I want that too because of my biotechnical experience as well as being an analyst, and I worked very, very closely also with the development, and the production, question whether this is actually the right one limit is. And the authorities are silent about it. It hasn't been tested either. Yes, that's the next thing one has to tell people.They sent the test certificate further. It was at best paper control. And the control labs have barely performed any analyses. Yes, they did four parameters, including clarity, color, content, but they didn't test for all the important things regarding contamination. And we've known that since February. There are now reports again, also from Germany, from Tuesday. And this is not being covered by mainstream media media. And there is where it needs to be reported, Before anyone thinks about further vaccination recommendations. So the famous PlasmidGate, as it is also called, yes, if you've heard of it. And that's not any, not just any idea that someone has, but this is real data from laboratories, repeatedly shown that we are there have a huge problem. And that was in the MDF the day before yesterday. And the authorities are silent. And this is a scandal, in my opinion. --------

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker raises concerns about the contamination of vaccines with plasmid DNA and questions the validity of the specified limit. They criticize the lack of testing and transparency by authorities and argue for further investigation into the potential negative effects of the contamination. The speaker suggests that clean communication, testing for adverse effects, and prospective studies differentiating between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals are necessary. They also highlight that the vaccine does not remain solely at the injection site but spreads to various organs, potentially causing side effects. The speaker emphasizes the need for open discussion and awareness of these issues.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ganz sicher nicht. Und bevor man überhaupt ausspricht, dass man wieder die Menschen aufruft, impfen zu gehen, sollte man mal gründlich hinsehen, was man jetzt auch in den letzten Jahren gelernt hat. Und man hat zum Beispiel gelernt, und zwar schon im Februar heuer wurde das das erste Mal publiziert, dass die der Impfstoff verunreinigt ist, nämlich mit Plasmit DNA. Und das ist kein kein keine falsche Information, wenn ich Sie jetzt ansehe, wie Sie die Stirn runzeln, sondern das sind Fakten. Es haben unabhängige Labors haben Plasmitrückstände gefunden, und zwar in einem viel höheren in einer viel höheren Konzentration, als dass die Spezifikation vorsieht. Und man muss noch dazusagen, man muss auch hinterfragen, stimmt überhaupt diese Spezifikation, diese berühmten zehn Nanogramm pro Dosis? Das ist Speaker 1: aber richtig gut. Speaker 0: Weil es ja auf nackte die DNA geht, hier ist die DNA genauso wie die Messenger RNA, sie ist verpackt in dem Lipid an Nanopartikel. Damit geht sie auch in die Zelle Und das ist gar nicht gesagt und ich ich möchte das auch aus aufgrund meiner biotechnischen Erfahrung als auch Analytikerin und ich war sehr, sehr eng gearbeitet auch mit der Entwicklung, mit der Produktion hinterfragen, ob das tatsächlich der richtige Grenzwert ist. Und die Behörden schweigen dazu, es wurde auch nicht getestet, ja? Das ist ja das Nächste, was man den Menschen sagen muss. Getestet hat der Hersteller, man hat das Prüfzertifikat dann weitergeschickt. Es wurde Papier bestenfalls kontrolliert und die Kontrolllabers haben kaum Analysen durchgeführt. Ja, die haben vier Parameter gemacht, unter anderem Klarheit, Farbe Content, also Gehalt. Und all die wichtigen Dinge auf Verunreinigung zu testen, das hat man nicht gemacht und man ist das seit Februar? Es gibt jetzt erneut wieder Berichte auch aus Deutschland von von Dienstag und das kommt überhaupt nicht in den Mainstream Medien an. Und dort muss es ankommen, bevor bitte doch irgendjemand nachdenkt über weitere Impfempfehlungen. Also das berühmte Plasmit Gate, wie's auch heißt, ja, wenn Sie's schon gehört haben. Und das ist kein keine irgendeine Idee, die irgendwer hat, sondern das sind reale Daten von Labors wiederholt gezeigt, dass wir da ein Riesenproblem haben Speaker 2: Und es war jetzt die Bewerbungstellung. Schweigen. Speaker 0: Und das ist ein Skandal, meiner Meinung nach Also das muss man dringend hinsehen. Speaker 1: Dass die Behörden nicht, was Sie sagen, ist ja alles richtig. Was die Behörden jetzt nicht gut reagieren, ist komplett inakzeptabel. Was man halt Auch Speaker 0: die Medien. Die Medien haben ein bisschen das Speaker 1: eine Relativierung hier sagen möchte. Also diese zehn Pickogramm, Da das sind ist die Empfehlung der WHO. Ja. Aber die Spezifikation im Impfstoff gibt es nicht, dass dort eben nur diese zehn Speaker 0: sollte gern. Das waren immer das Klein erzählen. Speaker 1: Genau. Das ist das, was die WHO empfiehlt und das, was so in der europäischen Pharmokopäer drinsteht für auch andere Impfstoffe, zum Beispiel Hepatitis a, Chicken Pooks, für Tollwut Impfstoffe, auch für Influenza, das sind diese zehn diese zehn Einheiten. Ob das bei dem Coronaimpfstoff auch so drinsteht, weiß ich nicht. Speaker 0: Da steht drinnen. Ich hab da die Chargen angesehen. Das steht drinnen sowohl bei den Es gibt ja Prozess eins, Prozess zwei Genau. Diese Spezifikation, das wird dir gezeigt in der Abreicherung. Das ist dir dann kein Routinetestparameter mehr zwingen, sondern ich muss das validieren, ich muss das zeigen. Speaker 1: Und wir müssen kurz Speaker 2: im Namen des Buches einschreiten. Wir kommen da alle nicht mehr mit, wenn Sie dieses Fachgespräch Speaker 0: ist eine Verunreinigung und der Prozess definiert mir das Produkt. Das ist ganz, ganz wichtig bei biotechnischen Verfahren. Das heißt, wie ich probtiere Das heißt, was Speaker 2: Sie sagen, ist nicht nur in in in meine und in die Sprache des Publikums übersetzt. Was Sie sagen, ist, Dass in diesen Impfstoffen Verunreinuhren gefunden wurden, von denen noch nicht klar ist, welche negativen Folgen sie haben. Genau. Ob sie auch Kardiogen sind oder Oh, ja. Speaker 0: Und ob man's überhaupt vom von der Konzentration her richtig erfasst, denn es handelt sich nicht nackte DNA, sondern die ist, wie gesagt, eben in dieses Vehikel verpackt, wie auch die Messenger RNA. Speaker 1: Ja. Speaker 0: Und damit kann ich sie gar nicht so mit diesen Testmethoden, die man Speaker 2: bei so einem Zweifel müsste so ein Medikament vom Markt genommen werden. Das sagen Sie ja damit, oder? Ja, also im Endeffekt wird man Speaker 0: das Zweifel und untersucht werden wir uns nicht Speaker 2: beworben werden. Speaker 0: Und zwar sofort. Und das wissen wir seit Februar. Im Februar kamen bereits die ersten Daten. Speaker 1: Das müssten drei Speaker 0: Dinge Niemand. Was macht Speaker 1: aus meinem Blick wegen. Das Erste ist, man müsste da sauber kommunizieren. Die Zulassungsbehörden müssten jetzt sagen, wir haben die und die Grenzwerte, die wurden überschritten oder nicht überschritten. Das müsst die jetzt mal machen. Das Zweite, was notwendig wäre, ist, man müsste testen, ob diese Mengen tatsächlich in sequenziellen Tierversuchen eine unkogene Wirkung haben auf die Stammzellen, das würde jetzt das zweite Schritt sein. Und das Dritte würde sein, Ja. Dass man jetzt, es würden ja in Deutschland jetzt fünfundsechzig Millionen Menschen geimpft, weltweit waren das viele Milliarden. Man müsste jetzt prospektive Studien ansetzen, zu unterscheiden zwischen Geimpften und Nicht Geimpften und dann zu sehen, gibt es irgendwelche Krebs Krebsrisiken, die dann tatsächlich bei den Menschen ankommen? Denn so ehrlich muss man sein, Diese zehn Einheiten, die man da empfiehlt von der WHO, die kommen ja aus anderen Impfstoffen und auch anderen Medikamenten. Da geht man davon aus zum Beispiel, dass bei der Influenzaimpfschrift zwischen vier Komma sieben mal zehn hoch minus sieben bis zehn hoch minus fünfzehn, die wahrscheinlich zehn noch minus fünfzehn, wissen Sie, wie null da sind. Die Wahrscheinlichkeit ist, dass ein Krebsfall auftritt oder eine Infektion. Also die die Die Wahrscheinlichkeit ist unheimlich gering und diese Basenpaare, das sollen ja immer zweihundert sein, die sind frakturiert. Es gibt 'n enthematischen Abbau. Also die Sicherheitsgrenze, die die WHO hier setzt, ist extrem hoch. Also es gibt 'n theoretisches Risiko, die das kann man nicht ausschließen. Das muss sauber kommuniziert werden. Es muss untersucht werden und es muss in 'ner prospektive Studie auch Speaker 2: bei Ihnen. Was Sie, der Vorwurf, den Sie haben, ist, dass das nicht gemacht wird, sondern dass es verschwiegen wird, korrekt? Speaker 0: Es wird verschwiegen und dass man, ich möchte noch einen weiteren Punkt nennen, ja? Also mein Punkt ist, und ich halte niemanden vom Impfen ab, ja? Menschen mögen das für sich. Sie kennen Ihren Körper, Sie sollen das tun, was Sie für richtig halten. Aber man muss den Menschen sagen, Achtung, das sind Verunreinigungen. Und das Zweite ist ja, es sei auch eine aufgeklärt gehört, dass der Impfstoff nicht an der Einstiegsstelle bleibt, sondern und ich hab noch einmal jetzt da jetzt dieser Tage nachgesehen, was denn die EMA, die Europäische Arzneimittelbehörde auf ihrer Homepage schreibt. Und sie sagt ganz konkret, also Sie verweist nur auf Tierstudien und sagt, der Impfstoff verbleibt, also bleibt an der Einstichstelle und geht auch in die Lymphknoten. Und zusätzlich bestätigen Sie auch, dass in diversen Organen auch kleine Mengen ankommen, ja? Das hat man den Menschen nie gesagt, und zwar in der Leber, im Herzen, im sogar im Gehirn, ja, in der Milz findet man kleine Mengen von von den Spike Proteinen. Und das hat man den Menschen doch nie gesagt und das finde sollten wir wissen. Bis hin zu den Nebenwirkungen. Auch darüber sollte gesprochen werden und die gibt es, diese Nebenwirkungen. Ich kann das selbst aus meiner eigenen Familie berichten.
_aussie17
Posted - December 13, 2023 at 10:43 AM
Saved - December 13, 2023 at 12:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
German TV MDR recently reported on DNA contamination in Pfizer's mRNA vaccine. All 5 batches tested in a private laboratory in Magdeburg were found to be contaminated with foreign DNA, exceeding the WHO limit. Concerns arise as lipid nanoparticles in the vaccine can potentially transport foreign DNA into human cells. While some scientists believe the risk of genetic damage is low, others suggest negative consequences are possible. The Paul Ehrlich Institute, responsible for vaccine safety, relies on manufacturers' test protocols and does not independently test for DNA contamination. Independent analysis attempts were unsuccessful. The manufacturing process change from Process 1 to Process 2 raises questions about batch comparability. BioNTech denies DNA contamination, but the accuracy and potential harm remain unclear. A false report warning doctors about the vaccine has also surfaced.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨🚨 For the first time, German TV MDR covers DNA contamination in Pfizer's mRNA vaccine! ---------Transcript----------- We are in a private laboratory in Magdeburg. Professor Brigitte König is examining Corona vaccines here. The result, all samples are contaminated. "With foreign DNA that should not be in the vaccine in this quantity. From my point of view, the alarming result is that all 5 batches had significant foreign DNA in them, which are well above the limit. It's about the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine. 5 batches were given to the Magdeburg laboratory because there was a suspicion." Foreign DNA could be contained in the vaccine, and beyond the limit. According to WHO, the limit is a total DNA content of 10 nanograms per dose. It is important that this is not exceeded, because there is a risk that foreign DNA could penetrate human cells. Brigitte König is an external professor at the medical faculty of the University of Magdeburg. She shows us the result of her privately conducted investigation. All 5 examined batches are contaminated. For the lowest concentration, the limit was exceeded by 83 times. The highest concentration found was 354 times the limit to König. This is concerning. The client of the analysis is also a private individual. The biologist Dr. Jürgen Kirchner. He has been one of the vocal critics of mRNA vaccines for years. He operates a website called Gene Vaccines. There he also advertises his books written under a pseudonym. His last one is called "Sullied." He has also appeared on YouTubers like the controversial Corona critic Paul Brandenburg. And discussed with him his theses on vaccines. Also the findings from Magdeburg. When DNA contaminations are found in a vaccine, that are as far above the limits as we have found, then in my view a special paragraph of the Medicines Act automatically applies, that is paragraph 5. It says if a medicinal product is questionable, then it must be taken off the market. And the biologist tries to achieve this. In September, he was at a hearing in the Bundestag's Petitions Committee on the topic of pandemic planning. Here he used the opportunity to present the analysis results from Magdeburg. These are gigantic exceedances of a limit for a really very questionable medicinal product. But do the vaccines actually contain foreign DNA? The accusation is not new. Already in April 2023, American scientists found foreign DNA above the limit in the vaccines from BioNTech and Moderna. Also in this pre-publication of a Canadian study from the end of October, several scientists come to a similar conclusion. The researchers write, our results extend the existing concerns regarding vaccine safety. But are such traces of foreign DNA actually dangerous? Humans constantly carry foreign DNA in themselves. This can come from food, but also if bacteria enter the lungs. These floating DNA snippets are digested in the gut by enzymes. But there is a difference with the mRNA vaccination. The vaccine contains so-called lipid nanoparticles. They smuggle the mRNA into the cells. They do not differentiate, however, whether they transport mRNA or DNA. Could foreign DNA thereby directly penetrate the cell nucleus? That is at least the concern of this American researcher, Prof. Dr. Philip Buckhaults. He is a clear proponent of mRNA technology. Yet he too says he found DNA residues in Pfizer vaccine. Here at a hearing in the South Carolina Senate, he explains the potential consequences of DNA. By email he writes us, at the moment no one knows for sure, whether the foreign DNA has caused damage or will cause damage. But there is clearly a justified theoretical risk of genetic damage to long-lived stem cells. We asked several renowned German scientists about this concern. Only a few reply to our request. Among them is Prof. Emanuel Wyler from the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, an institute funded by the federal government. He deems it extremely unlikely that the DNA could have negative consequences. Further, he writes, DNA in vaccines is not a new topic and is also tested for, for example, in a flu vaccine. Until now, no one has been interested, or one rightly trusts that the Paul Ehrlich Institute as the responsible authority performs the testing work correctly. In my opinion, this shows that this is not about DNA in vaccines, but either about fundamentally questioning vaccinations, our best weapon against infectious diseases, or about creating a sensation with the issue of Corona. However, Prof. Gerald Dyker, a chemist at the Ruhr University, does think that negative consequences are conceivable. He writes to us, against the background that one was under extreme time pressure, that the manufacturer decided, either without knowledge or with the acquiescence of supervisory authorities, to release the product with the remaining DNA impurities for mass vaccination. For Prof. Bernd Mühlbauer of the Drug Commission, however, it is still not clear at all, whether the vaccine is actually contaminated to a worrying extent. But he writes that residual amounts of DNA in the case of an mRNA vaccine cannot penetrate the cell nucleus and cause damage. Such experiments, including animal tests over several generations, are necessary and perhaps have already been conducted. And how do the authorities respond to the debate? The Paul Ehrlich Institute is responsible for the surveillance and safety of vaccines. We want to know, whether they themselves have tested the vaccines for foreign DNA or at least checked the results from Magdeburg. The written response is that parameters such as the residual DNA content in the vaccine are only experimentally tested by the manufacturer. The Institute thus does not test the vaccines themselves for DNA contamination but relies on the manufacturers' test protocols. The fact that the authority neither tests itself nor checks the analysis results from Magdeburg causes surprise to Professor Brigitte König. "I would have expected, or assumed, that the authorities would at least randomly check the end product for contamination and purity. Depending on the product, or if something else is inside. As I said, the authorities can do that. Especially the Paul Ehrlich Institute has the equipment for it." The competent Federal Ministry of Health questions the analysis from Magdeburg and points out that some of the tested batches were already expired, according to Dr. Kirchner's notification. However, for the found foreign DNA this is irrelevant, says the scientist. The DNA in these lipid particles does not multiply. And is more likely to be decomposed. That is, if the vaccine is not expired, we might expect even higher values but not lower ones. The DNA does not multiply in a sterile vaccine. Since the authorities apparently doubt the investigation results from Magdeburg, we want to have various batches tested ourselves. We contacted more than 20 laboratories, some of them at German universities, but also private providers who can conduct such analyses. From all, we received rejections or no response. So, we failed to have a DNA analysis conducted independently once again. It would indeed be important to conclusively clarify the question of the DNA content. Because one reason for suspected DNA contamination could be the manufacturing process itself, which is different from the one used during the authorization study. The vaccine used for the clinical studies was manufactured mechanically without the involvement of microorganisms. This production path is named Process 1 in the documents of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Pfizer then switched to a different production technique, referred to as Process 2. Only very few subjects in the authorization study received this vaccine. Here, the material was supplied by genetically modified bacteria. This process was apparently less complex. But did it actually pose a higher risk? That there were differences between the batches of the two different manufacturing processes has been a concern. Questions about comparability, characterization, and clinical suitability were raised. We ask BioNTech why the manufacturing process was changed nonetheless, but we do not receive an answer to this question. Regarding the suspected DNA contamination identified by the Magdeburg scientist, the company writes that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is not contaminated with DNA. Furthermore, it states that the batches were subjected to comprehensive quality control by the manufacturer. The Magdeburg scientist says that she has now examined additional vaccine batches. Here too, she found foreign DNA. However, we as an editorial team were not able to conclusively answer whether this analysis is indeed accurate and, most importantly, whether the suspected DNA contamination can cause harm. The most recent act in the debate is this official-looking letter from an association called Medical Treatment Association, which warns doctors about the vaccine. However, as informed by the responsible authorities, this is said to be a false report. ----------------------------------- H/T: @Aquarius3_0

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a private laboratory in Magdeburg, Professor Brigitte König investigates COVID-19 vaccines and finds that all samples are contaminated with foreign DNA, exceeding the permissible limit. The vaccines in question are from BioNTech Pfizer, and five batches were sent to the laboratory due to suspicions of excessive foreign DNA contamination. The concern is that this foreign DNA could enter human cells. The analysis was conducted by a biologist named Dr. Jürgen Kirchner, who is critical of mRNA vaccines. While some scientists express concerns about the presence of foreign DNA, others believe it is unlikely to have negative effects. The Paul Ehrlich Institute, responsible for vaccine safety, relies on manufacturers' test protocols and does not conduct its own DNA analysis. The debate surrounding the issue continues, with independent testing being difficult to obtain.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wir sind in einem Privatlabor in Magdeburg. Professorin Brigitte König untersucht hier Coronaimpfstoffe. Das Ergebnis, alle Proben sind verunreinigt mit Fremd DNA, die in dieser Menge nicht in den Impfstoff gehört. Speaker 1: Aus meiner Sicht ist das alarmierendes Ergebnis, Dass alle fünf Chargen erhebliche Fremd DNA inne hatten, drinnen hatten, die weit über dem Grenzwert Liegen. Speaker 0: Es geht den Impfstoff von BioNTech Pfizer. Fünf Chargen wurden in das Magdeburger Labor gegeben, weil es einen Verdacht gab, Fremd DNA könnte im Impfstoff enthalten sein, und zwar über dem Grenzwert. Der liegt laut WHO Ober bei einem DNA Gesamtgehalt von zehn Nanogramm pro Dosis. Es sei wichtig, dass dieser nicht überschritten werde, so König, weil die Gefahr bestünde, dass die Fremd DNA in die Zellen des Menschen eindränge. Brigitte der König ist externe Professorin an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität Magdeburg. Sie zeigt uns das Ergebnis ihrer privat durchgeführten Untersuchung. Alle fünf untersuchten Chargen seien verunreinigt. Bei der niedrigsten Konzentration wurde der Grenzwert das Dreiundachtzigfache übertroffen. Die höchste gefundene Konzentration betrug das Dreihundertvierundfünfzigfache vom Grenzwert zu König. Dies sei besorgniserregend. Auch der Auftraggeber der Analyse ist eine Privatperson, der studierte Biologe Doktor Jürgen Kirchner. Er gehört seit Jahren zu den lautstarken Kritikern der mRNA Impfstoffe. So betreibt her eine Webseite mit dem Namen Genimpfstoffe. Dort bewirbt er auch seiner unter einem Pseudonym geschriebenen Bücher. Sein Letztes heißt beschmutzt. Er war auch bei Youtubern wie dem umstrittenen Coronakritiker Paul Brandenburg zu Gast Speaker 2: Stoff gefunden werden, der so weit, wie wir es gefunden haben, über den Grenzwerten liegt, dann greift aus meiner Sicht Automatisch ein spezieller Paragraf des Arzneimittelgesetzes, das Paragraf fünf, der sagt, wenn ein Arzneimittel bedenklich ist, Dann muss es vom Markt genommen werden. Speaker 0: Und das versucht der Biologe auch zu erreichen. Im September war er bei einer Anhörung im zum Ausschuss des Bundestages zum Thema Pandemieplan. Hier nutzte er die Chance, die Analyseergebnisse aus Magdeburg vorzutragen. Speaker 2: Das sind gigantische Überschreitungen von einem Grenzwert für ein wirklich sehr bedenkliches Arzneimittel. Speaker 0: Doch enthalten die Impfstoffe tatsächlich Fremd DNA? Der Vorwurf ist nicht neu. Schon im April zweitausenddreiundzwanzig fanden amerikanische Wissenschaftler Fremd DNA über dem Grenzwert in den Impfstoffen von BioNTech und Moderna. Auch bei dieser Vorabveröffentlichung einer kanadischen Studie von Ende Oktober kommen mehrere Wissenschaftler lag zu einem ähnlichen Ergebnis. Die Forscher schreiben, unsere Ergebnisse erweitern die bestehenden Bedenken hinsichtlich der Impfstoffsicherheit. Doch sind solche Reste fremder DNA überhaupt gefährlich? Der Mensch trägt ständig Fremd DNA in sich. Die kann über die Nahrung kommen, aber auch wenn Bakterien in die Lunge gelangen. Diese frei schwebenden DNA Schnipsel werden im Darm von Enzymen dauert. Doch bei der mRNA Impfung gibt es einen Unterschied. Der Impfstoff enthält sogenannte Lipid Nanopartikel. Sie schleusen die mRNA in die Zellen. Sie unterscheiden jedoch nicht, ob sie mRNA a- oder eben DNA transportieren. Könnte die Fremd DNA dadurch direkt in den Zellkern gelangen? Das ist zumindest die Befürchtung dieses amerikanischen Forschers, Professor Doktor Philipp Backhauls. Er ist ein klarer Befürworter der mRNA Technologie, doch auch er sagt, er habe DNA Reste in Pfizer Impfstoff gefunden. Hier bei einer Anhörung im Senat von South Carolina, erklärt er mögliche Folgen der DNA. Per Mail schreibt er uns, im Moment weiß niemand mit Sicherheit, ob die Fremd DNA Schäden verursacht hat oder verursachen wird, aber es besteht ganz klar ein begründetes theoretisches Risiko genetischer sikogenetischer Schäden an langlebigen Stammzellen. Wir befragen mehrere namhafte deutsche Wissenschaftler zu dieser Befürchtung. Nur wenige beantworten unsere Anfrage. Darunter Professor Emmanuel Wieler vom Max Delbrück Center für Molekulare Medizin, Scene, ein von der Bundesregierung finanziertes Institut. Er hält es für extrem unwahrscheinlich, dass die DNA negative die wir Folgen haben könnte. Weiter schreibt er, DNA in Impfstoffen ist kein neues Thema und wird beispielsweise bei einem Grippeimpfstoff auch getestet. Das hat bisher niemanden interessiert beziehungsweise man vertraut richtigerweise darauf, dass das Paul Ehrlich Institut als zuständige Behörde die Prüfarbeit korrekt erledigt. Meines Erachtens zeigt das, dass es hier nicht DNA in Impfstoffen geht, sondern entweder Impfungen, unsere beste Waffe gegen Sektionskrankheiten grundsätzlich in Zweifel zu ziehen oder Stimmung zu machen mit dem Thema Corona. Professor Gerald Dücker, Chemiker an der Ruhr Universität, hält hingegen negative Folgen für denkbar. Er schreibt uns, vor dem Hintergrund, dass man unter extremem Zeitdruck stand, ist es vorstellbar, dass der Hersteller entschied, entweder unter Nichtwissen oder Duldung von zu Behörden, das Produkt mit den verbliebenen DNA Verunreinigungen in die Massenverimpfung zu geben. Für Professor Bernd Mühlbauer von der Arzneimittelkommission hingegen sei allerdings noch gar nicht geklärt, ob der Impfstoff tatsächlich in bedenkenswertem Ausmaß verunreinigt ist. Er schreibt aber, es ist ein Versäumnis der Zulassungsbehörden der Öffentlichkeit nicht mitzuteilen, ob und durch welche Methoden der Hersteller nachweisen musste, dass Restmengen von DNA im konkreten Fall der mRNA eine A-Impfung, nicht in den Zellkern eindringen und zu Schäden führen können. Solche Experimente, unter anderem Tierversuche über mehrere Generationen, sind notwendig und vielleicht ja auch schon durchgeführt. Rationen sind notwendig und vielleicht ja auch schon durchgeführt. Und wie reagieren die Behörden auf die Debatte? Zuständig für die Überwachung und Sicherheit der Impfstoffe ist das Paul Ehrlich Institut. Wir wollen wissen, ob es die Impfstoffe selbst auf Fremd DNA untersucht oder zumindest die Ergebnisse aus Magdeburg überprüft hat. Schriftlich heißt es, Parameter wie der Rest DNA Gehalt im Impfstoff werden nur vom Hersteller experimentell geprüft. Das Institut stella experimentell geprüft. Das Institut testet die Impfstoffe also nicht selbst auf DNA Verunreinigungen, sondern verlässt sich auf die Prüfprotokolle der Hersteller. Dass die Behörde wieder selbst Protokolle der Hersteller. Dass die Behörde weder selbst testet noch die Analyseergebnisse aus Magdeburg überprüft, stößt bei Professorin Brigitte König auf Verwunderung. Speaker 1: Ich hätte erwartet oder hatte eigentlich auch, bin davon ausgegangen, dass die Behörden Stichprobenartig zumindest das Endprodukt überprüfen und auf ja Kontamination oder auf die Reinheit, Je nachdem nach dem Produkt, oh, das ist noch etwas anderes drinnen. Wie gesagt, die Behörden können das, also vor allen Dingen das Paul Ehrlich Institut hat die Die Ausstattung dazu. Speaker 0: Das zuständige Bundesgesundheitsministerium stellt uns gegenüber die Analyse aus Magdeburg infrage und weist darauf hin, teilweise seien die getesteten Chargen nach Mitteilung von Doktor Kirchner auch abgelaufen gewesen. Für die gefundene Fremd DNA sei dies aber irrelevant, so die Wissenschaftlerin. Speaker 1: Die DNA In diesen Lipidpartikeln vermehrt sich ja nicht, ja, und wird eher noch abgebaut. Das heißt also, wenn der Impfstoff nicht abgelaufen ist, können wir eventuell nur mit höheren Werten rechnen, Aber nicht mit geringeren. Also die DNA vermehrt sich ja nicht in einem sterilen Impfstoff. Speaker 0: Da die Behörden die Untersuchungsergebnisse aus Magdeburg offenbar anzweifeln, zweifeln, wollen wir selbst verschiedene Chargen testen lassen. Wir fragen mehr als zwanzig Labore an, teilweise bei deutschen Universitäten, aber auch bei privaten bieten, die solche Analysen durchführen können. Von allen bekommen wir Absagen oder keine Reaktion. Es gelingt uns also nicht, eine DNA Analyse nochmals unabhängig durchführen zu lassen. Dabei wäre es durchaus wichtig, die Frage nach dem DNA Gehalt abschließend zu klären, denn ein Grund für mutmaßliche DNA Verunreinigungen könnte der Herstellungsprozess selbst sein, der ein anderer ist als noch bei der Zulassungsstudie. Denn der für die klinischen Studien verwendete Impfstoff wurde maschinell ohne Beteiligung von Mikroorganismen hergestellt. Dieser Herstellungsweg wird in den Unterlagen sagen der europäischen Zulassungsbehörde EMA, Prozess eins genannt. Pfizer ist dann auf eine andere Produktionstechnik umgestiegen, Prozess zwei genannt. Nur sehr wenige Probanden in der Zulassungsstudie erhielten diesen Impfstoff. Hier wurde das Material von gentechnisch veränderten tiering geliefert. Dieser Prozess war offenbar weniger aufwendig. Barg er aber tatsächlich ein höheres Risiko? Im Prüfbericht der europäischen Zulassungsbehörde zum Pfizer Impfstoff heißt es, dass es zwischen den Chargen der beiden verschiedenen Herstellungsprozesse zu Unterschieden kam. Dabei wurden Bedenken hinsichtlich Vergleichbarkeit, Charakterisierung und klinischer Eignung erhoben. Wir wollen von BioNTech wissen, warum das Herstellungsverfahren dennoch verändert wurde. Eine Antwort auf diese Frage erhalten wir nicht. Bezüglich der von der Magdeburger Wissenschaftlerin festgestellten mutmaßlichen DNA Verunreinigung schreibt das Unternehmen, der Pfizer BioNTech Covid neunzehn Impfstoff ist nicht mit DNA verunreinigt. Weiter heißt es, die Chargen wurden einer umfassenden Qualitätskontrolle durch den Hersteller unterzogen. Die Magdaburger Wissenschaftlerin sagt, mittlerweile habe sie weitere Impfschärgen untersucht. Auch hier fand sie Fremd DNA. Ob diese Analyse tatsächlich zutrifft und vor allem ob die mutmaßliche DNA Belastung Schaden anrichten kann, diese Fragen konnten wir als Redaktion allerdings nicht abschließend beantworten. Bislang letzter Akt in der Debatte ist dieses offiziell aussehende Schreiben einer Vereinigung namens medizinischer Behandlungsverbund, der Ärzte vor dem Impfstoff warnt. Wie die zuständigen Behörden mitteilten, sei dies aber eine Falschmeldung.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

SOURCE https://www.mdr.de/video/mdr-videos/c/video-781834.html

Corona-Impfstoff in der Kritik – Was ist dran? | MDR.DE Der Gesundheitsminister hat gerade erst vor allem Menschen mit Risikofaktoren zu Auffrischungsimpfungen geraten. Doch ein Corona-Impfstoff ist aktuell in der Diskussion. Ein Labor will Verunreinigungen gefunden haben. mdr.de

@_aussie17 - aussie17

@Aquarius3_0 - Aquarius-elect 🗣️

💥Mouse News 🐭Network💥 #MNN Germany:First TV station,MDR,broadcasted a report regarding DNA contamination of the Pfizer/Biontech vaxxed.Dr. Jürgen Kirchner,laboratory Magdeburg,confirmed the findings of @Kevin_McKernan:"All samples massive contaminated -over permitted limits"/2

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Emailable format https://www.aussie17.com/p/finally-german-tv-mdr-breaks-the

Finally! German TV MDR Breaks the Story, Highlighting Potential DNA Risks in COVID Vaccines for the First Time A significant development aussie17.com
_aussie17
Posted - December 7, 2023 at 12:17 PM
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 7:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The ex-CEO of Singapore's largest insurance provider advises against COVID boosters. Tan Kin Lian, former CEO of NTUC Income, highlights a significant increase in deaths from cancer, heart failure, and stroke, suggesting a drop in immunity caused by mRNA vaccines. With COVID cases low and the virus mild, he questions the need for boosters. A straw poll shows 88% won't take the booster, and 75% believe the vaccine harms the body. This raises concerns about vaccine efficacy and potential risks.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Holy Moly! Another U-Turn! The ex-CEO of Singapore's largest local Insurance provider just issued a statement advising against COVID Boosters! Mr. Tan Kin Lian, most notably known for his extensive 30-year tenure as CEO of NTUC Income, Singapore's only insurance cooperative, issued a statement on 6th December 2023. Full Statement: ----------------------------------------------------- Covid booster Some of you may be deciding if you wish to take another covid booster. MOH recommends it for the older people, but does not compel it. I have decided not to take the booster. My friends pointed out that there were 21,282 deaths in 2018 (the year before the pandemic). It has now increased to 26,891 in 2022. This increase of 26% is significant and alarming. It seems that more people are dying from cancer, heart failure and stroke. The deaths from covid is quite low now. My friends have read a lot of literature and concluded that the mRNA vaccine caused the body to suffer a drop in immunity and that has lead to the additional deaths from the above causes, i.e. cancer, etc. I think that they may be right - that the vaccine does cause harm to the immune system. I decided that I do not need the booster, because few people are dying from covid now. The virus is now quite mild. There is no need to take the risk of having another booster. Recently, I did a straw poll among a dozen people. About 88% said that they will not take the booster. 75% think that the vaccine harms the body. Tan Kin Lian ----------------------------------------------

@_aussie17 - aussie17

We are at the stage now where I need to start hiring interns to update my dedicated page to monitor U-Turns...!! https://www.aussie17.com/p/aussie17s-u-turn-tracker

Aussie17's U-Turn Tracker™ When I worked in Pharma, we always gauged the sentiments towards our drugs by measuring the positions of KOLs (Key Opinion Leaders). Let’s just say that the more KOLs start making U-Turns, the more likely the "Safe and Effective" narrative will collapse. Secondly, I challenge anyone to create a list of anyone making a U-Turn in the opposite direction (i.e. from an anti-mRNA to pro-mRNA). aussie17.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Emailable format here! https://www.aussie17.com/p/national-insurance-ex-ceo-drops-stunning

National Insurance Ex-CEO Drops Stunning Statement. Another U-Turn! Prominent ex-CEO of Singapore's largest National Insurance company makes a U-Turn! aussie17.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Related Prof. Dr. Konstantin Beck Raises Alarm Over Surge in Swiss Cancer Cases based on Insurance Data https://www.aussie17.com/p/university-of-lucernes-prof-dr-konstantin

University of Lucerne's Prof. Dr. Konstantin Beck Raises Alarm Over Surge in Swiss Cancer Cases in 2022 "...individuals taking cancer medication doubled from previous years—a 94% increase in 2022." aussie17.com
_aussie17
Posted - December 7, 2023 at 12:17 PM
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 4:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The ex-CEO of Singapore's largest local Insurance provider, Tan Kin Lian, advises against COVID boosters. He highlights a significant increase in deaths from other causes and suggests that the mRNA vaccine may harm the immune system. With COVID cases low and the virus mild, he believes the risk of a booster is unnecessary. A straw poll showed 88% of people won't take the booster, with 75% believing the vaccine harms the body.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Holy Moly! Another U-Turn! The ex-CEO of Singapore's largest local Insurance provider just issued a statement advising against COVID Boosters! Mr. Tan Kin Lian, most notably known for his extensive 30-year tenure as CEO of NTUC Income, Singapore's only insurance cooperative, issued a statement on 6th December 2023. Full Statement: ----------------------------------------------------- Covid booster Some of you may be deciding if you wish to take another covid booster. MOH recommends it for the older people, but does not compel it. I have decided not to take the booster. My friends pointed out that there were 21,282 deaths in 2018 (the year before the pandemic). It has now increased to 26,891 in 2022. This increase of 26% is significant and alarming. It seems that more people are dying from cancer, heart failure and stroke. The deaths from covid is quite low now. My friends have read a lot of literature and concluded that the mRNA vaccine caused the body to suffer a drop in immunity and that has lead to the additional deaths from the above causes, i.e. cancer, etc. I think that they may be right - that the vaccine does cause harm to the immune system. I decided that I do not need the booster, because few people are dying from covid now. The virus is now quite mild. There is no need to take the risk of having another booster. Recently, I did a straw poll among a dozen people. About 88% said that they will not take the booster. 75% think that the vaccine harms the body. Tan Kin Lian ----------------------------------------------

_aussie17
Posted - December 7, 2023 at 12:50 AM
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 2:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Swiss Federal Office manipulated a health survey, but private health insurance data reveals a significant increase in the number of people receiving cancer drugs. Professor Dr. Konstantin Beck from the University of Lucerne raised concerns about the conflicting statements. The health survey showed that the majority of the Swiss population felt healthy and happy, but mental strain increased, especially among young women. However, the survey's data on chronic diseases was retracted due to a change in the question format. Private insurance data from Helsana indicated a 94% increase in cancer drug recipients from 2017 to 2022. The cause of this surge remains unclear, with vaccination and other factors being potential explanations. The trust in the Federal Office has been undermined due to the publication and subsequent retraction of misleading data.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Whoops! Swiss Federal Office caught manipulating Health Survey but Private Health Insurance data shows a staggering increase of population receiving cancer drugs! "If you do the comparison, the one that wanted to be made in the health survey, calculate the increase from 2017 to 2022, then the value increased by 94%. So there were 94% more recipients of cancer drugs." Professor Dr Konstantin Beck from University of Lucerne raises alarm in his recent presentation. ------------------------------------------------------ Hello everyone, my name is Konstantin Beck, I am a health economist at the University of Lucerne. We are asking the question, how healthy was Switzerland in the year 2022? The reason for this is because in November '23, some publications, official releases appeared that have been partially retracted, which were very differing in their statements and the confusion on this point is somewhat significant at the moment. So, it's about sorting out these different statements. To the fact-checkers online, all statements made here are actually just those of the Federal Office of Public Health, and later of the Helsana insurance, the own calculations are kept within narrow limits. And if you are interested in this type of video, please subscribe and activate the bell so that you are informed when there is a new video as YouTube's algorithms sometimes do not make these videos easily findable. Let's start with the Health Surveys 2022. This is conducted every five years by the Federal Office of Statistics. It receives high attention and is the basis for many scientific studies. And to this, the Federal Office states in its press release on November 3rd, when the health surveys were published, In the year 2022, 85%, so the vast majority of the Swiss population, felt healthy and 83% described themselves as happy. However, more than one-third of Swiss people live with a permanent health problem. However, these health problems cannot have been that great, because at least half of this third describes themselves as happy. The only negative that emerges here is the mental strain, which has increased compared to 2017 and especially in the younger age groups of 15-24-year-olds and there particularly among young women. Then there are a few details on smoking and alcohol consumption. And then, as I said, these are important results of the Swiss Health Surveys 2022 of the Federal Office for Statistics. So, even after the corona pandemic, the Swiss population is predominantly in good health according to their own assessment. This would actually say it all and solve the problem. Now, the surprising thing is that at the same time, in the database of the Federal Office, a statistic with detailed information on the health survey could be found. This was published under the abbreviation given here, and I believe I queried it on November 4th. And there you find answers to the question, have you ever had one of the following three diseases or health problems in your life? The questions were about heart attack, stroke, and cancer. And I will display it right away. What comes next has already been retracted by the Federal Office. But originally it stated that in 2017, approximately 33,000 reports of ever having a heart attack, nearly 28,000 a stroke, and about 117,000 cancer. And when you look at the figures for 2022, it increases to 170,000, 124,000, almost 461,000. So it rises by a factor of 4 to 5. It's a dramatic increase. However, I have corrected that. I calculated how much is due to age. We have immigration as well. Clearly, we have more cancer cases if more people live in Switzerland. But this gives corrections in the range of 2,000 to 9,000 cases. So according to this statistic, we would have a third of a million more cancer cases in Switzerland, than one would expect based on age, sex, and immigration. And quite honestly, if this were the case, and I first believed these data too, they are from the Federal Office, then our cancer care and our cardiac infrastructure would probably be at their limits, if not collapsed. So at the latest by November 14th, at that time I realized this, you could no longer call up these numbers. The Federal Statistical Office erased the data for 2017 with the note that the health surveys of 2017 and 2022 are not comparable. No more information was provided. One had to inquire back. So if you have such a severe error, then it would perhaps be better or desirable that the error would be communicated better. Upon inquiry, it was then found out that in 2017 the question was, did you have any of the following diseases last year? And in 2022 the question was, have you ever had any of the following diseases or health problems in your life? Of course, that's a huge difference. Many people who didn't have a problem last year may have had the problem over the last few years. So understandable that then the second number will be larger than the first and also understandable that they are no longer comparable. Not quite comprehensible, why you would change this question and thereby torpedo the comparability. Another argument, I won't go into it in so much detail now, is that the significance in many sub-evaluations was not given and they therefore wanted a larger sample, more 'yes' answers. Those are technically convincing arguments. But when you know that these are very sensitive questions because the vaccine critics expect that the negative impact of the vaccination could be shown and then just these data are first published to the institution and then retracted, it does not contribute to the trust in the Federal Office, unfortunately. Well, there remain open questions. Why was the obviously wrong comparison published? How did it even come about that the office, even though the difference is known, why did the office refrain from a detailed error communication, as I have already said? But why also does the press release of the Federal Office contrast so greatly with the development of chronic diseases? So there isn't even a mention that there was an increase here and what one doesn't know at all is, what is the actual situation concerning the increase or decrease of cancer diseases? And fortunately, besides the office, there are also private providers. There's the drug reporter Helsana, which was published on November 30th and which specifies for each year the number of persons who, projected onto Switzerland, have taken cancer drugs that year. And we see, if we look at 2013 to 2016, it rises from 90,000 to nearly 107,000. Then it goes down again and then goes up a bit. So it fluctuates. In the pre-pandemic period, it fluctuates. Then it rises slightly in the year 2020 and then increases very sharply to 152,000 respectively 154,000 in the year 2022. If we present this graphically, we see this brown curve, fluctuations within two standard deviations from a growth area and then a massive increase in the year 2021, 2022 to over 150,000 cases. If you do the comparison, the one that wanted to be made in the health survey, calculate the increase from 2017 to 2022, then the value increased by 94%. So there were 94% more recipients of cancer drugs. In the year 2020, so in the pandemic year, when I have not had so many cancer drug recipients, we have plus 9%, but then we have plus 95% from the long-term trend and even plus 106%. So in short, we have a doubling of the number of cancer cases. This is not five times more as in this distorted statistic of the Federal Office, which has also been retracted, but it's not nothing. It's a very high value when we have twice as many people who are dependent on cancer drugs and cancer treatments. Then immediately the question arises, is vaccination the cause? For the vaccination as the trigger for the cancer cases speaks to the timing pattern, that this spike begins precisely in the year of the vaccinations. If now, however, Corona were the trigger for cancer cases, why is the corresponding increase missing in the year 2020? Does it take that long until Corona has an effect? And also then one must say, yes, then but the vaccination was not able to prevent the severe courses that lead to cancer. So even then, the vaccination doesn't turn out convincingly. If a third factor were responsible, which cannot be excluded but then what could that be? What could explain this sudden and extremely significant increase? I hope to provide a bit more clarity there. I thank Helsana for the fact that they did not alter their statistics in 2022 so that a time series emerges that can still be interpreted today and I thank you for your attention. -------------------------------------- Please note that this will likely be "community noted" because (as of 7 Dec 2023), the existing "official" COVID guidelines appear to still be significantly influenced by major pharmaceutical entities, and regulatory bodies continue to be potentially compromised and official data appears to be massaged.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, Konstantin Beck, a health economist from the University of Lucerne, discusses the health status of Switzerland in 2022. He highlights the conflicting information and confusion caused by various publications on the topic. According to the Swiss Health Survey, 85% of the population felt healthy and 83% considered themselves happy in 2022. However, over a third of Swiss people live with a chronic health issue. The survey also reveals an increase in mental health problems, particularly among young women. Beck then discusses discrepancies in data regarding heart attacks, strokes, and cancer cases, which were later retracted by the Federal Statistical Office. He questions the lack of transparency and communication regarding these errors. Additionally, he presents data from the Helsana Drug Report, showing a significant increase in cancer medication usage in 2022 compared to previous years. Beck raises questions about the potential causes of this sudden rise in cancer cases and suggests further investigation is needed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Grüezi miteinander, mein Name ist Konstantin Beck. Ich bin Gesundheitsökonom der Universität Luzern. Wir stellen hier die Frage, wie gesund war die Schweiz im Jahr zwanzig zweiundzwanzig? Und das aus dem Grund, weil im November dreiundzwanzig Einige Publikationen, amtliche Veröffentlichungen erschienen sind, die zum Teil wieder widerrufen worden sind, die sehr unterschiedlich in der Aussage waren und das Durcheinander in diesem Punkt ist im Moment ein bisschen groß. Es geht also darum, diese verschiedenen Aussagen zu sortieren. An die Faktenchecker im Netz, Alle Aussagen, die hier gemacht werden, sind eigentlich nur die Aussagen des Bundesamts für Gesundheit später noch der Helsana Versicherung. Die eigenen Berechnungen halten sich in engen Grenzen. Und falls Sie diese Affen Videos interessiert, lassen Sie doch ein Abo da. Das oder vor allem aktivieren Sie die Glocke, weil Sie dann informiert werden, wenn es ein neues Video gibt und die Algorithmen von Youtube ja zuweilen diese Videos nicht so leicht auffindbar machen. Beginnen wir mit der Gesundheitsbefragung zweitausendzweiundzwanzig. Diese wird alle fünf Jahre vom Bundesamt für Statistik durchgeführt. Sie genießt hohe Beachtung und ist Grundlage für viele wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen. Und dazu sagt das Bundesamt in seiner Medienmitteilung am dritten elften, als die Gesundheitsbefragung veröffentlicht wurde. Im Jahr zwanzig zweiundzwanzig fühlten sich fünfundachtzig Prozent, also die überwiegende Mehrheit der Schweizer Bevölkerung gesund Und dreiundachtzig Prozent bezeichneten sich als glücklich, allerdings lebt mehr als ein Drittel der Schweizer mit einem dauerhaften Gesundheitsproblem. So groß können diese Gesundheitsprobleme aber nicht gewesen sein, denn mindestens die Hälfte dieses Drittls bezeichnet sich ja als glücklich. Das einzig Negative, was hier auftaucht, ist die psychische Belastung, die gegenüber zwanzig siebzehn gestiegen ist. Und besonders in den jüngeren Altersgruppen der fünfzehn- bis Vierundzwanzigjährigen und dort besonders bei den jungen Frauen. Dann gibt's noch ein paar Angaben zu rauchen und Alkohol und dann wie gesagt, das sind wichtige Ergebnisse der schweizerischen Gesundheitsbefragung zwanzig zweiundzwanzig des Bundesamts für Statistik. Also auch nach der Coronapandemie ist die Schweizer Bevölkerung nach eigener Einschätzung bei überwiegend guter Gesundheit. Damit wäre eigentlich alles gesagt und das Problem gelöst. Nun, das Überraschende ist, dass zeitgleich In der Datenbank des Bundesamts eine Statistik mit Detailangaben zu Gesundheitsbefragung gefunden werden konnte. Diese war unter dem Kürzel, das hier angegeben ist, publiziert und ich hab sie schätzungsweise am vierten elften abgefragt. Und dort gibt es Antworten auf die Frage, haben Sie in Ihrem Leben jemals eine von den folgenden drei Krankheiten oder gesundheitlichen Probleme gehabt und gefragt wird nach Herzinfarkt hier und schlagenkrebs und ich blende es gleich ein das was jetzt kommt, ist vom Bundesamt bereits wieder widerrufen worden. Aber ursprünglich stand da, dass im Jahr zweitausendsiebzehn Rund dreiunddreißigtausend Angaben, jemals einen Herzinfarkt gehabt zu haben, sieben achtundzwanzigtausend knapp einen Hirnschlag und rund hundertsiebzehntausend Krebs. Und wenn man jetzt die Zahlen für zweitausendzweiundzwanzig anschaut, Dann steigt das auf hundertsiebzig, auf hundertvierundzwanzigtausendvierhunderteinundsechzig knapp. Also es steigt den Faktor vier bis fünf. Das ist 'n dramatischer Anstieg, allerdings hab ich da noch korrigiert. Ich hab ausgerechnet, Wie viel ist der Alterung geschuldet? Wir haben ja auch eine Zuwanderung. Klar haben wir mehr Krebsfälle, wenn mehr Leute in der Schweiz wohnen. Das gibt aber Korrekturen im Bereich von zwei- bis neuntausend Fällen und dann komm ich immer noch auf zusätzliche Fälle von hundertdreiunddreißig, vierundneunzigtausenddreihundertfünfunddreißigtausend. Also wir hätten in der Schweiz gemäß dieser Statistik Eine Drittelmillion mehr Krebsfälle, als man aufgrund von alt- und schlechten Zuwanderung erwarten würde. Und also ehrlich gesagt, wenn dem so wäre, aber ich habe diese Daten auch zuerst geglaubt, das sind Bundesamtsdaten, dann werden wahrscheinlich unsere Krebsversorgung und unsere Herzinfrastruktur mindestens am Anschlag, wenn nicht zusammengebrochen. Also spätestens ab vierzehnten November, damals hab ich das realisiert, konnte man diese Zahlen nicht mehr aufrufen. Das bf s löscht die Daten für zweitausendsiebzehn mit dem Verweis, die Gesundheitsbefragung zweitausendsiebzehn und zweitausendzweiundzwanzig seien nicht vergleichbar. Mehr Informationen wurden aber nicht zur Verfügung gestellt. Man musste schon Rückfragen. Also wenn man einen so heftigen Fehler hat, dann wäre es vielleicht besser oder es wäre wünschenswert, dass der Fehler dann besser kommuniziert wird. Auf Rückfrage fand man dann heraus, dass zweitausendsiebzehn die Frage gestellt wurde, haben Sie im Ja eine der folgenden Krankheiten gehabt und zweitausendzweiundzwanzig war die Frage, haben Sie in Ihrem Leben überhaupt jemals eine der folgenden Krankheiten oder gesundheitliche Problem gehabt. Das ist natürlich 'n Riesenunterschied, oder viele Leute, die im letzten Jahr kein Problem hatten, hatten eben vielleicht doch im letzten im Laufe der letzten Jahre Das Problem. Also nachvollziehbar, dass dann die zweite Zahl größer wird als die erste und auch nachvollziehbar, dass sie nicht mehr vergleichbar sind. Nicht ganz nachvollziehbar, warum man diese Frage ändert und damit die Vergleichbarkeit eigentlich torpediert. Es wird dann weiter argumentieren, ich geh jetzt da nicht mehr so groß darauf ein, Dass eben die Signifikanz in vielen Unterauswertungen nicht gegeben war und sie deshalb eine größere Stichwort mehr ja Antworten haben wollten. Das sind technisch überzeugende Argumente, aber Wenn man weiß, dass das sehr heikle Fragen sind, weil hier die Impfstkeptiker erwarten, Dass sich die negative Auswirkung der Impfung zeigen könnte und man da grad diese Daten zuerst in die eine Richtung publiziert und dann wieder widerruft, Trägt das nicht zum Vertrauen ins Bundesamt bei, leider. Gut, jetzt bleiben eben offene Fragen. Warum wurde der offensichtlich falsche Vergleich publiziert? Wie kam es Dazu, dass man über, wenn man ja schon den Unterschied ja kennt, warum verzichtete das Amt auf eine ausführliche Fehlerkommunikation, wie ich schon gesagt habe? Warum steht aber auch die Medienmittern des bfaus in so großen Widerspruch zur Entwicklung bei den chronischen Krankheiten? Also da ist ja nicht einmal eine Erwähnung, dass man hier einen Zuwachs hat. Und was man gar nicht weiß, wie steht es nun tatsächlich die Zu- oder Abnahme von Krebserkrankungen? Und zum Glück gibt es neben dem Amt auch noch private Anbieter. Es gibt der Arzneimittelreporter Helsana, der am dreißigsten Elften publiziert worden ist und der für jedes Jahr die Zahl angibt, Wie viele Personen haben in diesem Jahr hochgerechnet auf die Schweiz Krebsmedikamente bezogen? Und wir sehen, wenn wir da zweitausenddreizehn bis sechzehn anschauen, das steigt von neunzigtausend auf hundertsiebentausend, genau. Entschuldigung. Dann geht's aber wieder runter und geht wieder 'n bisschen hoch. Es schwankt also. In der vorpandemischen Zeit schwankt es, dann steigt es ein bisschen im Jahr zwanzig zwanzig und steigt dann sehr stark auf hundertzweiundfünfzig, respektive hundertvierundfünfzigtausend im Jahr zwanzig zweiundzwanzig. Wenn wir das grafisch darstellen, dann sehen wir diese Braune Kurve, die Schwankungen innerhalb von zwei Standardabweichung, also ein Zufallsbereich. Und dann ein massiver Anstieg im Jahr zwanzig einundzwanzig, zwanzig zweiundzwanzig auf Dose über einhundertfünfzigtausend Fälle. Wenn man den Vergleich macht, den man in Der Gesundheitsbefragung machen wollte den Anstieg von zweitausendsiebzehn auf zweitausendzweiundzwanzig berechnet, dann stieg der Wert vierundneunzig Prozent an. Es gab also vierundneunzig Prozent mehr Krebsmedikamentebezüge. Im Jahr zwanzig zwanzig, also im Pandemiejahr wich die Anzahl Krebsbezöger, der Krebsmedikamentenbezüge nicht so stark ab plus neun Prozent. Aber nachher haben wir plus fünfundneunzig Prozent vom langfristigen Trend und sogar plus hundertsechs Also kurz gesagt, wir haben eine Verdoppelung der Anzahl Krebsfälle. Das ist zwar jetzt nicht fünfmal mehr, Wie in dieser verzerrten Statistik des Bundesamts, die auch zurückgezogen worden ist, aber es ist nicht nichts. Es ist ein sehr hoher Wert, wenn wir Doppelt so viele Leute haben, die auf Krebsmedikamente und Krebsbehandlungen angewiesen sind. Und dann kommt sofort die Frage, ist die Impfung Die Ursache. Für die Impfung als Auslöser der Krebsfälle, sprich das zeitliche Muster, dass dieser Ausschlag genau im Jahr der Impfungen beginnt. Phasen nun aber Corona, der Auslöser der Krebsfälle wäre, Warum fehlt dann der entsprechende Anstieg im Jahr zwanzig zwanzig? Dauert das so lange, bis sich Corona auswirkt? Und Auch dann muss man sagen, ja, dann ist aber die Impfung nicht fähig gewesen, die schweren Verläufe, die zu Krebs führen, zu verhindern. Also Auch dann schneidet die Impfung jetzt nicht überzeugend ab. Falls ein dritter Faktor verantwortlich wäre, was nicht ausgeschlossen werden kann, Aber was könnte dann das sein? Was könnte diesen schlagartigen und extrem hoch signifikanten Anstieg erklären? Ich hoffe, damit seien ein bisschen mehr Klarheit entstanden. Ich danke der Elsana dafür, dass sie ihre Statistik im Jahr zwanzig zweiundzwanzig als nicht abgeändert hat, sodass eine Zeit rein steht, die man auch heute noch interpretieren kann. Und ich danke für Ihre Aufmerksamkeit.
_aussie17
Posted - December 6, 2023 at 3:06 AM
Saved - December 6, 2023 at 5:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Robert Malone recently addressed the UK Parliament, highlighting the need for transparency and access to data regarding the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines. He emphasized the rushed nature of the vaccine development process and the disregard for informed consent. Dr. Malone called for open disclosure of data to resolve controversies surrounding the vaccines. He mentioned adverse events such as myocarditis, reproductive health damage, blood clotting, ocular and nervous system damage, immunologic and oncologic harms, and death. The testimony was science-based and aimed to promote informed decision-making.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Dr. Robert Malone's @RWMaloneMD address to the Members of UK Parliament (4th December 2023). "On the current data of somewhere between 700 and 1000 peer-reviewed studies regarding the safety or lack thereof of these products clearly demonstrate a series of adverse events I'm just gonna list them myocarditis including tachycardia, reproductive health damage women all over the world know about the damage to their menstrual cycles ... blood clotting, abnormal blood clotting, damage to peripheral ocular and central nervous systems including stroke, immunologic and oncologic harms which cold is going to be speaking about and the biggest adverse event of all, death" TRANSCRIPTION FOR LOCAL TRANSLATION---- Thank you, Pierre, and now I call on Dr. Robert Malone to give his evidence. So I'm Robert Malone. I'm a physician and scientist, and I need to acknowledge that my middle name is Wallace, and Andrew has assured me that I will not be drawn and quartered for what I'm about to say. First off, I wish to speak extemporaneously to you rather than slides. There is an unmet need for a rapid response capability to allow a global capacity to mitigate the risks of emerging infectious disease and engineered pathogens. That is a valid concern. The technology has developed to a state where almost anyone with an undergraduate degree in biology can weaponize pathogens. We know, here in the United States, as somebody with security clearance in the biodefense industrial complex for the DOD, that the binary weapons that were developed by the U.S. military for deployment, potentially as a countermeasure against the Russian tank threat, can be readily reproduced by virtually any biologist in their garage currently. So there is a valid threat. There is an unmet need. Ostensibly, this technology has advanced this mRNA or modified messenger ribonucleic acid based gene therapy vaccination technology was advanced on short notice because there is an unmet need for a platform technology that would allow a rapid response capability. That's the justification. Furthermore, the justification was that we had a pathogen based on modeling here in the U.K. at Imperial College that had a 3.4% case fatality rate. And we would potentially be seeing mass graves, people dying in the streets, vans full of bodies outside of hospitals, et cetera. That was all a lie. We knew that was a lie very early on, but the people that spoke the truth that actually gathered the data, such as happened at Stanford, that demonstrated that we had a case fatality rate of about 0.02%, okay? Not 3.4%. Despite having that knowledge, having it available in the first quarter, early in the first quarter of 2020, there was a concerted effort to justify the imposition of this technology in a rapid fashion on the basis of the thesis that there's a 3.4% case fatality rate associated with this virus. What transpired in that rush was a fundamental breach of both ethics and regulatory norms that have been developed over decades. We're all familiar with this. We're all familiar with the policies that have been put in place since World War II in Nuremberg, that humans, human beings, have the right to informed consent. And what was done here in a haphazard way under the justification ostensibly that we had to, we had to essentially reject, throw into the rubbish norms that had been developed over decades, both for assuring vaccine safety and for assuring informed consent in patients, was all, all had to be jettisoned on short notice because of the threat of a 3.4% case fatality rate and the need to move a potential countermeasure forward without the due process that normally would take place. That's what transpired. And I can tell you, you know, I'm labeled as far right in all the pejoratives that we're all so familiar with, including being a conspiracy theorist, but all I am is a physician and scientist who happened to have had a role in the genesis of this technology when I was a young man back in 1987 to 1990. I'm very, very familiar with the technology, worked as an academic to try to advance it until I determined that I could not overcome the toxicity associated with it and abandoned it for other technology platforms, which I also developed. But in this case, what, what I have objected to is that as a physician and scientist who is well-trained in clinical research and regulatory affairs, that we have decimated my, my discipline. We have rejected the knowledge that myself has, have contributed to and all of my peers and colleagues over decades about how one should do this, how one should act, what steps one should take in order to ensure that we have safe and effective products for humans. It's that simple. And furthermore, that we have rejected the norms that have been developed since World War II to respect human dignity, to ensure that human beings are treated as, as humans. They are, their, their autonomy, their sovereignty is respected, that they are provided with informed consent. Instead of informed consent about the truth of these products and their developmental state, their immature developmental state, we were given a series of lies. Those lies included that these products were safe and effective, of course, without actually qualifying what safe and effective was. You'll recall safe and effective was repeated again and again and again without stating what that meant, okay? That's neuro-linguistic programming. That's psychological operations. That's propaganda. We also received the propaganda that these products would remain at the site of injection and the draining lymph nodes. That was known to be a falsehood before these products were ever deployed into humans. Furthermore, and that's revealed by the, the non-clinical data packages from Japan and from Australia that have now been disclosed, okay? So we knew that these products deployed all through the body. We knew that they didn't stay where they were injected. We were also told the falsehood that these products in, had a molecule, this modified ribonucleic acid, which would only last in your body for a short period of time. We now know that these products remain in your body, remain biologically active for an undetermined period of time of at least weeks and probably months, another lie. We were also told that these products were, it was necessary that none of us would be safe until we were all safe. This was part of a propaganda campaign to insist that we all accept these products. And that was done, by the way, in violation of well-established norms. That involved coercion, compulsion, and enticement. Ice creams for children to take your jab, or hamburgers, or whatever the enticement was, that is illegal. That is not something that is allowed under standard, well-established bioethics, okay? So this, this series of lies was used to justify deployment of these experimental products, truly with great profit margins, no doubt, which were intended to demonstrate safety and effectiveness of a vaccine platform technology that then, according to a hearing of the WHO in 2020, as I recall, headed up by Margaret Liu, 2019? 21. 2021, thank you, Jill, was, were established that this would become a platform and all that would be necessary in the future would be to swap in a new RNA sequence, okay? Now, what we need to resolve the controversy regarding the toxicities associated with this, because we now clearly know that these are neither safe nor effective. We knew at the time, Pfizer knew at the time, these products would not prevent infection. They would not prevent replication and spread of the virus. Now the data is suggesting they don't even augment, they certainly don't protect against death or prevent against death and disease. We all know that. But that was what was asserted at the time and what we need to resolve all the controversy that swirls around these products and whatever the latest data disclosure is, is for governments to just be open and transparent. That's my core message. All I'm asking for is that we be allowed to access, in an open and transparent fashion, the data which NHS and the healthcare agencies of the world have acquired, so that those data can be analyzed. So we no longer have to wrassle over whether this data is good or that data is good. has this flaw etc etc let's all disclose in an open transparent way so that the world's scientists can evaluate that data and put to rest this controversy about whether or not these products are safe and effective. On the current data of somewhere between 700 and 1000 peer-reviewed studies regarding the safety or lack thereof of these products clearly demonstrate a series of adverse events I'm just gonna list them myocarditis including tachycardia, reproductive health damage women all over the world know about the damage to their menstrual cycles that's now these are all things that are widely acknowledged peer-reviewed multiple hundreds of studies reproductive health coagulopathy including stroke that means blood clotting, abnormal blood clotting, damage to peripheral ocular and central nervous systems including stroke, immunologic and oncologic harms which cold is going to be speaking about and the biggest adverse event of all, death so in conclusion what we've had here is a rushed product a rushed technology a failure to provide respect for humans in not allowing them to have informed consent and furthermore actively deploying the most massive propaganda campaign in the history of the modern world to suppress the ability of the public to gain access merely to have the knowledge of what the adverse event risks are and I come to you with one request open the books let's see the data and let's allow those data to be examined so we no longer have to have this you know these little fights over these little details we can actually get to the bottom of one of the most important questions the world is facing right now where these products actually safe and effective? Thank you for your time! --------------------------------

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Robert Malone, a physician scientist, discusses the rushed development and deployment of mRNA-based gene therapy vaccinations. He highlights the breach of ethics and regulatory norms, as well as the lack of informed consent. Dr. Malone emphasizes the need for open and transparent access to data regarding the safety and effectiveness of these products. He mentions the numerous adverse events associated with the vaccines, including menstrual cycle disruptions, reproductive health issues, blood clotting, damage to various body systems, immunologic and oncologic harms, and even death. Dr. Malone urges governments to disclose the data so that scientists can evaluate it and resolve the controversy surrounding these products.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, Pierre. And now I've called on doctor Robert Malone So I'm Robert Malone. I'm a physician scientist, and I need to acknowledge that my My name is Wallace, and Andrew has assured me that I will not be drawn in order for what I've got to say. I don't need I've spun my favorite. First off, I wish to speak extemporaneously to you rather than There is an unmet need for rapid response capability to allow a global key Technology has developed to the state where almost anything with a undergraduate degree in biology And weaponize pathogens. We know here in the United States is somebody with security clearance in the bio defense industrial complex For the DOD that, the binary weapons that were developed by US military, For deployment potentially as a countermeasure against, the Russian tank threat, can lead reproduced by virtually any biologist in their garage currently. K? So there is a valid threat. There is an unmet need. Ostensibly, this technology who's advanced, this mRNA or modified messenger ribonucleic acid based gene therapy vaccination technology Was advanced on short notice because there is an unmet need for a platform technology that would allow a rapid response capability That's the justification. Furthermore, the justification was that, we had a pathogen Based on modeling here in the UK at Imperial College, it had a 3.4% case fatality rate. And we would potentially be seeing, mass graves, people dying in the streets, vans full of bodies outside of hospitals, etcetera. That was all a lot. We knew that was a lie very early on, but the people that spoke the truth that actually gathered the data such as happened at Stanford, it demonstrated that we had a case fatality rate of about 0.02%. Okay? Not 3.4%. Despite having that knowledge, Making it having it available in the Q1, early in the Q1 of 2020, there was a concerted effort to justify The imposition of this technology in a rapid fashion. On the basis of the thesis that there's a 3.4 percent case fatality rate associated with this virus. What transpired in that rush was a fundamental breach of the ethics and regulatory norms that have been developed over decades. We're all familiar with this. We're all familiar with The policies that have been put in place since World War 2 in Nuremberg that humans human beings Have the right to inform consent. And what was done here in a haphazard way, Under the justification ostensibly that we had to, we had to Essentially reject on throwing to the drugs norms that have been developed over decades, Both for assuring vaccine safety and for assuring informed consent in patients was all all had to be jettisoned on short notice because Without, the due process that normally would take place, that's what transpired. And I can tell you you you you know, I'm I'm labeled As far right and all the pejorities that we're all so familiar with including being a conspiracy theorist, but all I am is a physician and scientist who happened to have had a role in the genesis of this technology when I was a young man, back in 1987 to 1990, I was very, very familiar with the technology, worked as an academic to I which I also developed. But in this case, what what I have objected to is that as a physician And scientist who is well trained in clinical research and regulatory affairs that We have decimated my my discipline. We have rejected the knowledge that myself has have contributed to and all of my peers and colleagues over decades about how one should do this, how one should act, What steps one should take in order to ensure that we have safe and effective products for humans. It's that simple. And furthermore, that we have rejected the norms that have been developed since World War 2 to respect human dignity, To ensure that human beings are treated as as humans. They are their their autonomy, their sovereignty is respected, that they are provided With informed consent. Instead of informed consent about the truth of these products and their developmental Their immature developmental state, we were given a series of lies. Those lies included that these products were safe and Effective, of course, without actually qualifying what safe and effective was. You'll recall safe and effective was repeated Again and again and again without stating what that meant. Okay? That's the neurolinguistic program. That's psychological operations. That's propaganda. We also received the propaganda that these products would remain at the site of injection and draining lymph nodes that was known to be a falsehood before these products were ever deployed into humans. The nonclinical data packages from Japan and from Australia that have now been disclosed. So we knew that these products deployed all through the body. We knew that they didn't stay where they We were also told falsehood that these products in had a molecule, this modified Ribonucleic lot. We were also told that these products were it was necessary that none of us would be safe until we were safe. This is part of the propaganda campaign to insist that we all accept these products, and that was done, by the way, in violation of well established forms. That involved coercion, compulsion, That is illegal. That that is not something that is allowed under standard, well established bio Okay. So this this series of lies was used to justify deployment of these experimental That then according to a hearing of the WHO in 2020 as I recall headed up by Margaret Lou 29th 21. Month. 2021, thank you, Joel. Was we're established that this would become a platform and all that would be necessary in the future would be to swap in a new RNA sequence. Okay? Now what we need to resolve from the controversy regarding the toxicities associated with this because we now clearly know that these are neither safe nor effective. We knew at the time, Pfizer knew at the time, These products would not prevent infection. They would not prevent replication and spread of the virus. Now the data is suggesting they don't even augment, they certainly don't protect against death or prevent against death and disease. We all know that, but that was what was asserted at the line. And what we need to resolve all the controversy that swirls around these products and whatever the latest data disclosure is, is for governments to just be open and transparent. That's my core message. All I'm asking for is that we be allowed to Access in an open and transparent fashion. The data which NHS and the, Health care agencies of the world have acquired so that those data can be analyzed, so we no longer have to wrestle Over whether this data is good or that data has this flaw, etcetera, etcetera, let's all disclose in an open and transparent way so that the world scientists can evaluate that data and put to rest this controversy about whether or not these products are staying effective. I'm running out of time. The current data of, somewhere between 700 a1000 Peer reviewed studies regarding the safety or lack thereof of these products clearly demonstrate a series of adverse events. I'm lunch to their menstrual cycles. That's now these are all things that are widely acknowledged, peer reviewed, multiple hundreds of studies. Reproductive health, coagulopathy, including stroke, that means blood clotting, abnormal blood clotting, damage to, peripheral, ocular, the In central nervous systems, including stroke, immunologic and oncologic harms, which doctor Cole is to be speaking about and the biggest adverse event of all, death. So in conclusion, What we've had here is a rushed product, a rushed technology, a failure to provide Respect for humans, in not allowing them to have informed consent. And furthermore, ability of the ability of the public to gain access merely to have knowledge of what the adverse event risks are. And I come to you with 1 request. Open the books. Let's see the data, and let's allow those data to be examined So we no longer have to have this, you know, these little fights over these little details. We can actually get to the bottom of one of the most important

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Emailable format here for those outside X https://www.aussie17.com/p/important-dr-robert-malones-address

IMPORTANT - Dr. Robert Malone's address to the Members of UK Parliament (4th December 2023) I am is a physician and scientist who happened to have had a role in the genesis of this technology ... that I could not overcome the toxicity associated with it aussie17.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

SOURCE https://x.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1731935293966590436?s=20

@RWMaloneMD - Robert W Malone, MD

The expert testimony at the invitation of MP Andrew Bridgen in the UK parliament yesterday was important. The room was overflowing with people. Many members of Parliament and Lords showed up to listen. The testimony given by myself as well as other scientists and physicians was science based, truthful and accurate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Robert Malone, a physician and scientist, discusses the need for a rapid response capability to address emerging infectious diseases and engineered pathogens. He highlights the potential risks associated with the development of bioweapons and the justification for the mRNA-based gene therapy vaccination technology. Dr. Malone criticizes the misinformation surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, including the exaggerated case fatality rate and the disregard for ethical and regulatory norms. He emphasizes the importance of informed consent and transparency in accessing and analyzing data to determine the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. Dr. Malone also mentions various adverse events associated with the vaccines, such as myocarditis, reproductive health issues, blood clotting, and death. He calls for open disclosure of data to resolve the controversy surrounding the vaccines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, Pierre. And now I call on doctor Robert Malone to give his evidence. So I'm Robert Malone. I'm a physician and scientist, and I need to acknowledge that my middle name is Wallace, and Andrew has assured me that I will not be drawn in quarter for whatever you have to say. I don't need to. I've spud my favorite. First off, I wish to speak extemporaneously to you rather than the slides. There Is an unmet need for rapid response capability to allow a global key capacity to mitigate the risks Of emerging infectious disease and engineered pathogens. That is a valid concern. The technology has developed to the state Where, almost anyone with a undergraduate degree in biology Can weaponize pathogens. We know here in the United States as somebody with security clearance in the bio defense Industrial complex for the DOD that's, the binary weapons that were developed by US military, for deployment potentially as a countermeasure against the Russian tank threat, can That'll be reproduced by virtually any biologist in their garage currently. Okay? So there is a valid threat. There is an unmet need. Ostensibly, this technology was advanced, this mRNA or modified messenger Ribonucleic acid based gene therapy vaccination technology was advanced On short notice because there is an unmet need for a platform technology that would allow a rapid response capability, that's justification. Furthermore, the justification was that, we had a pathogen Based on modeling here in the UK at Imperial College, it had a 3.4% case fatality rate and we would potentially be seeing Mass graves, people dying in the streets, vans full of bodies outside of hospitals, etcetera. That was all a lie. We knew that was a lie very early on but the people that spoke the truth that actually gathered the data such as happened at Stanford, evidence? It demonstrated that we had a case fatality rate of about 0.02%. Okay. Not 3.4%. Despite having that Acknowledge. Making it having it available in the Q1, early in the Q1 of 2020, there was a concerted effort to justify the imposition of this technology in a rapid fashion on on the basis of the thesis that there's a three 0.4% case fatality rate associated with this virus. What transpired in that rush was a fundamental breach of both ethics In regulatory norms that have been developed over decades. We're all familiar with this. We're all familiar with the Policies have been put in place since World War 2 in Nuremberg that humans human beings have the right to inform And what was done here in a haphazard way, under the justification ostensibly That we had to, we had to essentially reject, throw into the rubbish Norms that have been developed over decades both for assuring vaccine safety and for assuring Informed consent and patients was all all had to be jousted on short notice because of the threat of a 3.4% case fatality and the need to move a potential countermeasure forward without, the due process that Normally, it would take place. That's what transpired. And I can tell you you you, you know, I'm I'm labeled as, Far right in all the pejoratives that we're all so familiar with including being a conspiracy theorist, but all I am is a physician and scientist who happened to have had a role in the genesis of this technology when I was a young man, back in 1980 overcome the Overcome the toxicity associated with it and abandon it for other technology platforms which I also developed. But in this case, what what I have objected to is that as a physician And scientist who is well trained in clinical research and regulatory affairs that we have decimated my My discipline. We have rejected the knowledge that myself has been have contributed to and all of my peers and colleagues over decades About how one should do this, how one should act, what steps one should take in order to ensure that we have safe and effective products for humans. It's that simple. And furthermore, that we have rejected the norms that have been developed Since World War 2, to respect human dignity, to ensure that human beings are treated As as humans, they are their their autonomy, their sovereignty is respected That they are provided with informed consent. Instead of informed consent about the truth of these products In their developmental state, their immature developmental state, we were given a series of lies. Those lies included that these products We're safe and effective, of course, without actually qualifying what safe and effective was. You'll recall safe and effective was repeated Again and again and again without stating what that meant. Okay? That's the neurolinguistic program. That's psychological Operations. That's propaganda. We also received the propaganda that these products would remain at the site of injection and the draining lymph That was known to be a falsehood before these products were ever deployed into humans. Furthermore, And that's revealed by the, the non clinical data packages from Japan and from Australia that have now disclosed. K. So we knew that these products deployed all through the body. We knew that they didn't stay where they were injected. We were also told falsehood that these products in had a molecule, this modified ribonucleic acid, Which would only last in your body for a short period of time. We now know that these products remain in your body, remained biologically active for an undetermined period of time of at least weeks and probably months, Another law. We were also told that these products were it was necessary that, None of us would be safe until we were all safe. This was part of a propaganda campaign to insist that we all accept these products And that was done, by the way, in violation of well established norms. That involved coercion, compulsion, and enticement. Ice creams for children to take your jab Or hamburgers or whatever the enticement was, that is illegal. That that is not something that is allowed Under standard well established bioethics. Okay? So this this series of lies was used to justify the of these experimental products truly, with great profit margins, no doubt, which were intended to demonstrate safety and effectiveness So they vaccine platform technology that then according to a hearing in the WHO in 2020 is our call headed up by Margaret Alright. Lou, 29th 21. 2021. Thank you, Joel. What we're established that this would become a platform and all that would be necessary area in the future would be to swap in a new RNA sequence. Okay? Now What we need to resolve is the controversy regarding the toxicities associated with this because we now clearly know that these are neither Neither safe nor effective. We knew at the time, Pfizer knew at the time, these products would not prevent infection. They would not prevent replication and spread Of the virus. Now the data is suggesting they don't even augment, they certainly don't protect against death or prevent against death Hep and disease. We all know that. But that was what was asserted at the time and what we need to resolve all the controversy that swirls around these products and whatever the latest data disclosure is is for governments to just be open and transparent. That's my core message. All I'm asking for is that we be allowed to access in an open and transparent Good fashion. The data which NHS and the healthcare agencies of the world have Quiet so that those data can be analyzed, so we no longer have to wrestle over whether this data is good or That data has this flaw, etcetera, etcetera. Let's all disclose in an open and transparent way so that the world Scientists can evaluate that data and put to rest this controversy about whether or not these products are staying effective, and I'm running out of time. The current data Of, somewhere between 700 a1000 peer reviewed studies regarding the Safety or lack thereof of these products clearly demonstrate a series of adverse events. I'm just gonna listen. Myocarditis including tachycardia, reproductive health damage, women all over the world know about the damage to their menstrual cycles. That's now, These are all things that are widely acknowledged, peer reviewed, multiple hundreds of studies. Reproductive health, coagulopathy including stroke that means clotting, abnormal blood clotting, damage to, peripheral, ocular, and central nervous systems, including stroke, Immunologic and oncologic harms, which doctor Cole is gonna be speaking about, and the biggest adverse event of all, death. So in conclusion, what we've had here is a rushed product, a rushed technology, a A failure to provide respect for humans, in not allowing them to have Of informed consent. And furthermore, actively deploying the most massive propaganda campaign in the history of the modern To suppress the ability of the public to gain access merely to have knowledge of what the adverse event risks It's all. And I come to you with one request, open the books, let's see the data, And let's allow those data to be examined so we no longer have to have this, you know, these little fights or These little details, we can actually get to the bottom of one of the most important questions the world is facing right now. Were these products actually safe and effective? Thank you

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Please note that this will likely be "community noted" and Dr. Robert Malone may be branded as "Antivaxxer" because (as of 6 Dec 2023), the existing "official" COVID guidelines appear to still be significantly influenced by major pharmaceutical entities, and regulatory bodies continue to be potentially compromised.

_aussie17
Posted - December 5, 2023 at 10:08 AM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 3:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Pfizer executive, claims that the design of COVID-19 vaccines was intentionally harmful. He argues that there was no real pandemic and that governments created a public health emergency. Yeadon believes that the vaccines contain toxic materials, including spike proteins that can cause blood clots and neurological defects. He also suggests that the vaccines target reproductive tissues in women and girls. Yeadon estimates that the vaccines have caused the deaths of 17 million people. However, his views are controversial, and he is often labeled as an "antivaxxer."

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Boom!! 🚨🚨🚨 Dr. Mike Yeadon's address to the Members of UK Parliament (4 December 2023) ---------------------------------------------- Hello. My name is Dr. Mike Yeadon. Probably know by now that I'm a career research scientist and biologist. I've worked in the biopharmaceutical industry for over 30 years. Famously, a former vice president at Pfizer, left in 2011 as vice president and worldwide head of Respiratory research. I was responsible for everything from idea to clinical proof of concept. In the ten years after leaving Pfizer, I've worked as an independent. I consulted to 30 biotech companies. I also founded Led and sold my own biotech Ziarco. And we were written up in a 2017 article in Forbes magazine. I think it was Converting Pfizer Discards into Gold, and it was written by a former Pfizer board member. So three years before this alleged event started, I was very well regarded in the industry. I'm going to tell you that the design of the so called vaccines was intentionally to harm people, and I'm going to give you several examples of that based on my extensive industry experience of rational drug design. Not a single atom or molecule in a synthetic drug is in there. By luck, it's in there because people chose it to be in there and they intended certain things to flow from their choices. But just very briefly, you should know, I hope there has not been a pandemic. Denis Rancourt's data shows that the all cause mortality evidence data did not increase at all in the run up to the Declaration. Fraudulently by who? Of a pandemic. There is no public health emergency except that created by our governments. An inappropriate fraudulent PCR test was used to give people the impression that they had a particular disease where they didn't. There were all normal diseases. And then what happened was in three different ways. People were treated badly through changed medical procedures that were imposed above the level of nation. Briefly, mass ventilation of people inappropriately in hospitals that led to lots of deaths. In care homes, many people were given sedatives and respiratory depressants which led to their deaths. My PhD was specifically in that area of opiates and respiratory depression. And in the community, people were denied life saving antibiotics and died of bacterial pneumonia. There's your pandemic. There is no other pandemic. And based on this lie, we were told that vaccines were coming our way and would be our savior. Two things, as I say. First, there's no pandemic, so you certainly don't need an experimental, rushed medical intervention. But secondly, even if you did, as someone who's worked in the industry for over 30 years, I am telling you it's absolutely impossible to invent, test, clinically, evaluate and manufacture and then launch on global scale a complex biomedical product. It's absolutely impossible. It's not as close, it's years wrong. The fastest record price of this was six years. And friends of mine who've worked all their lives in manufacturing of complex biological products tell me the methods development alone for the development of a reproducible manufacturing process itself takes a number of years. So whatever it is you think was done, I am telling you, there was not the development of a proper medical product. What I think happened was the advancement of materials that are intentionally toxic. And then they were sketchily, advanced and jammed into people's arms, often coerced, sometimes even mandated, with the unsurprising effect that millions of people have died. I don't have time today to explain what I think they're going to do in the future, but suffice to say, more injections are coming if we don't stop this. So, like I said, I'm skilled in the arts of rational drug discovery. So why am I saying these materials are intentionally toxic? Well, let me give you the first example. How do you think your body plays nice with itself, but when it's infected or detects a cancer, it goes to war. And the answer is, it distinguishes self things that are meant to be inside you from non self, from foreign things that are not meant to be inside you. And it is trained exquisitely to detect and attack non self foreign things. If you inject a person with a gene that encodes a foreign piece of protein, like a spike protein from a foreign organism, your body will detect that. And every single cell that takes up that material and expresses foreign protein will be attacked and killed by your immune system. Now, if you think that's advanced immunology, let me put you right. It's in the first chapter. Distinguishing self from non self is one of the foremost lessons of immunology. And every single person involved in the train of delivery of these materials to doctor's hands knew what I've just told you, they will inevitably cause injury. Then on top of that, it's not just bad enough that you're making a foreign protein, you're making a specific material called spike protein. Those materials are biologically active. That is, if you add them to human blood, for example, they start to coagulate, it clots. Those materials are biological toxins. So now you've got a genetic sequence that forms foreign proteins. That means your body attacks and kills every cell that does it. And if you should release any of that protein in your blood, it will form blood clots. If it releases it near nerves, for example, you will get one or other of several neurological defects. And of course, it's not just nerves or blood. There's a third major factor, and there are many others. But let me give you the third one. These materials are formulated it's normal to formulate drugs. These are formulated in fatty globules called lipid nanoparticles. What they do is disguise the foreign genetic information so your body doesn't see it initially until it gets inside your cells and it goes all around your body. It will glide through the cell wall as if it wasn't there. And that was the entire point of it. So that means these materials don't just go to your lymph nodes. And they certainly don't stay in your arm where they're injected. They go all around the body, including into your brain and your blood and every organ in your body. But here's the thing. Ten years ago, there were papers published, and it was well established and well known in the industry that lipid nanoparticles, lipid nanocarriers deposit their cargo, preferentially in the ovaries, and that was confirmed with the pfizer products in an animal experiment performed for the Japanese regulators. So, by design, these agents cause an autoimmune attack on every tissue. They make your body form a well understood biological toxin that can damage multiple organs in your body. And they deposited their cargoes, preferentially in the reproductive tissues of women and girls. So if you think that's by luck, then you're mistaken. There is no doubt in my mind, anyone of my caliber, and this is my peers that worked on this, absolutely understood what they were designing and manufacturing. So I think, having heard what I've just said, that there was no pandemic and the lie was maintained in order to inject people en masse, I think five and a half billion people with an intentionally dangerous substance, 17 million of whom have died so far. What do you think is happening and what do you think your role as an individual is in stopping this crime? On. Thank you for listening. -------------------------------------------- Please note that this will likely be "community noted" and Dr. Mike Yeadon may be branded as "Antivaxxer" because (as of 12 Dec 2023), the existing "official" COVID guidelines appear to still be significantly influenced by major pharmaceutical entities, and regulatory bodies continue to be potentially compromised.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Mike Eden, a former vice president at Pfizer, claims that the design of the COVID-19 vaccines was intentionally harmful. He argues that there was no pandemic and that the PCR test was fraudulent. He believes that the vaccines contain toxic materials, including a spike protein that triggers an immune response and can cause blood clots and neurological defects. He also states that the lipid nanoparticles in the vaccines deposit preferentially in the ovaries, potentially causing autoimmune attacks on multiple organs. Dr. Eden urges individuals to recognize the alleged crime and take action to stop it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. My name is doctor Mike Eden. Probably know by now that I'm a career research scientist, biologist. I've worked in the biopharmaceutical industry for over 30 years. Famously, a former vice president at Pfizer. I left in 2011 as vice president and worldwide head of research. I was responsible for everything from idea to clinical proof of concept. In the 10 years after leaving Pfizer, I've worked as an independent. I consulted to 30 biotech companies. I also founded, led, And sold my own biotech, Zianco. And we were written up in a 2017 article in Forbes Magazine. I think it was, converting Pfizer discounts into gold, and it was written by a former Pfizer board member. So 3 years before this alleged event started, I was very well regarded in the industry. I'm going to tell you that the design of the so called vaccines was intentionally to harm people, And I'm going to give you several examples of that based on my extensive industry experience of rational Drug design. Not a single atom or molecule in a synthetic drug is in there by luck. It's in there because people chose it to be in there, And they intended certain things to flow from their choices. But just very briefly, you should know, I hope, There has not been a pandemic. Dennis Rancourt's data shows that the all cause mortality Evident data did not increase at all in the run up to the declaration fraudulently by WHO pandemic. There is no public health emergency except that created by our governments. A inappropriate fraudulent PCR test was used To give people the impression that they had a particular disease where they didn't, they were all the normal diseases. And then what happened was In 3 different ways, people were treated badly through changed medical procedures that were imposed above the level of nation, briefly Mass ventilation of people inappropriately in hospitals that led to lots of deaths. In care homes, Many people were given sedatives and respiratory depressants which led to their deaths. My PhD was specifically in that area of opiates and respiratory depression. And in the community, people were denied lifesaving antibiotics, and died of bacterial pneumonia. There's your pandemic. There is no other pandemic. And based on this lie, we were told that vaccines were coming our way and would be our saviour. Two things. As I say, first, there's no pandemic so you certainly don't need an experimental or rushed medical intervention. Secondly, even if you did, as someone who's worked in the industry for over 30 years, I am telling you, it's absolutely impossible To invent, test, clinically evaluate, and manufacture, and then launch on global scale a complex Biomedical products. It's absolutely impossible. It's not as close. It's years' wrong. The fastest record price of this was 6 years, And friends of mine who worked all their lives in manufacturing of complex biological products tell me the methods development Alone for the development of a reproducible manufacturing process itself takes a number of years. So whatever it is You think we're done. I am telling you that was not the development of a proper medical product. What I think happened was, the advancements of materials that are intentionally Toxic, and then it was sketchy advanced and jammed into people's arms, often coerced, sometimes even mandated, With the unsurprising effect that millions of people have died, I don't have time today to explain What I think they're gonna do in the future, but suffice to say, more injections are coming if we don't stop this. So Like I said, I'm skilled in the arts of rational drug discovery. So why am I saying these materials are intentionally toxic? Let me give you the first example. How do you think your body plays nice with itself but when it's infected or detects a cancer it goes to war? And the answer is it distinguishes self, things that are meant to be inside you from non self, on foreign things so they're not meant to be inside you. And it is trained exquisitely to detect and attack non self foreign things. If you inject a person with a gene that encodes a foreign piece of protein, like a spike protein, from a foreign organism, Your body will detect that. And every single cell that takes up that material And expresses foreign protein will be attacked and killed by your immune system. Now if you think that's advanced immunology, Let me put you right. It's in the 1st chapter. Distinguishing self from nonself is one of the firm, foremost essence of immunology and every single person involved in in the train of delivery of these materials So doctors' hands knew what I've just told you, they will inevitably cause injury. Then on top of that, It's not just bad enough that you're making a foreign protein. You're making a specific material called spike protein. Those materials are biologically active. That is, if you add them to human blood, for example, They start to coagulate. It clots. Those materials are biological toxins. So now you've got a genetic sequence that forms foreign proteins that means your body attacks and kills every cell that does it. And if you should release any of that protein in your blood, it will form blood clots. If it releases it near nerves, for example, you will get 1 or other of several neurological defects. And, of course, it's not just nerves or blood. There's a third major factor and there are many others but let me give you the third one. These materials are formulated. It's normal to formulate drugs. These are formulated in fatty globules called lipid Nanoparticles. What they do is disguise the foreign genetic information so your body doesn't see it initially until it gets inside your cells and it goes all round your body. It will glide through the cell wall as if it wasn't there. And that was the entire point of it. So that means these materials don't just go to your lymph nodes and they certainly don't stay in your arm where they're injected. They go all around the body including into your brain and your blood and every organ in your body. But here's the thing. 10 years ago, there were papers published, and it was well established and well known in the industry that lipid nanoparticles, lipid nanocarriers, Deposit their cargo preferentially in the ovaries. And that was confirmed with the Pfizer products in an analog experiment performed with the Japanese regulators. So, by design, These agents cause an autoimmune attack on every tissue. They make your body form a well understood Biological toxin that can damage multiple organs in your body. And they deposited their cargos preferentially in the reproductive tissues of women and girls. So if you think that by luck, then you're mistaken. There is no doubt in my mind that anyone of my caliber, and this is my peers that worked on this, absolutely understood What they were designing and manufacturing. So I think having having heard what I've just said, there was no pandemic, And the lie was maintained in order to inject people en masse, I think, 5 a half 1000000000 people with an intentionally dangerous substance, 17,000,000 of whom have died so far. What do you think is happening, and what do you think Your role as an individual is in stopping this crime. Thank you for listening.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

For local translations, download SRT on my page here. https://www.aussie17.com/p/important-dr-mike-yeadons-address

IMPORTANT - Dr. Mike Yeadon's address to the Members of UK Parliament (4 December 2023) I'm going to tell you that the design of the so called vaccines was intentionally to harm people aussie17.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Mike's estimation that the vaccines have killed 17 Million is based on @denisrancourt work https://x.com/BLNewsMedia/status/1731820599339585680?s=20

@BLNewsMedia - Bright Light News

"We calculate the toxicity of the vaccine for all ages and...given the number of doses that have been given worldwide...to conclude that 17 million people would have been killed by this vaccine." -@denisrancourt and study co-authors @Marine_Baudin_, @jmyremets, @josephmhickey FULL INTERVIEW from @IntCovidSummit, Romanian Parliament: https://brightlightnews.com/staggering-17-million-deaths-after-covid-vaccine-rollout-drs-denis-rancourt-marine-baudin-jeremie-mercier/

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the vaccine is toxic and could have caused the deaths of 17 million people worldwide. They argue that after each vaccine rollout, there is a temporary increase in overall mortality. This pattern is observed consistently across countries with sufficient data. Another speaker points out that typically, deaths decrease in the summer and increase in the winter, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality right after the campaigns, even in the summer. They mention that this pattern is seen in both the northern and southern hemispheres. The speakers emphasize that this is a new phenomenon.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We calculate the toxicity of the vaccine for all ages and the number allows us, given the number of doses that have been given worldwide, to conclude that 17,000,000 people would have been killed by this vaccine. You can actually see when there's a rollout of a booster, for sample, which happens very quickly in time for a given age group, you can actually see immediately following it a maximum in the all cause mortality. So an excess mortality actual peak that's temporarily associated with that rollout. We see that repeatedly for each rollout. Consistently across all countries. All the countries that have sufficient data where you're able to look at it and you have both the vaccine data and the mortality data. This is what we see. Speaker 1: When you look at all cause mortality, you see that deaths are increasing in the winter and decreasing in the summer. And it's the opposite in the southern hemisphere. There, summer is our winter. So in the summer, you should have low debt. But during the COVID vaccine campaign, suddenly you see spikes in mortality right after vaccine campaigns. And it's very clear because it's in the summer we should see a low death period. Speaker 2: Especially in the boosters, like for the southern boosters, like Speaker 0: if you Speaker 2: have a peak, of course the booster will roll out Basically everywhere at the same time around the world. And in the southern hemisphere, it's a trough, as Janine just explained. So we should have a trough. But then we have an actual Winterpeak, actual Boosterpeak and another Winterpeak. Everywhere in all the 17 countries we worked out, When data is good in the Southern Hemisphere, we saw that picture. Speaker 1: And something you never saw before.
Staggering 17 Million Deaths After Covid Vaccine Rollout -Drs. Denis Rancourt, Marine Baudin & Jérémie Mercier (Nov. 19, 2023) A groundbreaking study by Drs. Denis Rancourt, Marine Baudin and Jérémie Mercier found 17 million people died worldwide after the Covid “vaccine” rollout.”We calcu… brightlightnews.com
_aussie17
Posted - December 5, 2023 at 10:08 AM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 12:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Mike Yeadon, a renowned scientist, claims that the design of the COVID vaccines was intentionally harmful. He argues that there was no real pandemic, and the PCR test was used fraudulently. He believes that the vaccines contain toxic materials, including spike proteins that can cause blood clots and neurological issues. Furthermore, he suggests that the lipid nanoparticles in the vaccines target reproductive tissues. Dr. Yeadon urges individuals to question the narrative and take action to stop this alleged crime.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Boom!! 🚨🚨🚨 Dr. Mike Yeadon's address to the Members of UK Parliament (4 December 2023) ---------------------------------------------- Hello. My name is Dr. Mike Yeadon. Probably know by now that I'm a career research scientist and biologist. I've worked in the biopharmaceutical industry for over 30 years. Famously, a former vice president at Pfizer, left in 2011 as vice president and worldwide head of Respiratory research. I was responsible for everything from idea to clinical proof of concept. In the ten years after leaving Pfizer, I've worked as an independent. I consulted to 30 biotech companies. I also founded Led and sold my own biotech Ziarco. And we were written up in a 2017 article in Forbes magazine. I think it was Converting Pfizer Discards into Gold, and it was written by a former Pfizer board member. So three years before this alleged event started, I was very well regarded in the industry. I'm going to tell you that the design of the so called vaccines was intentionally to harm people, and I'm going to give you several examples of that based on my extensive industry experience of rational drug design. Not a single atom or molecule in a synthetic drug is in there. By luck, it's in there because people chose it to be in there and they intended certain things to flow from their choices. But just very briefly, you should know, I hope there has not been a pandemic. Denis Rancourt's data shows that the all cause mortality evidence data did not increase at all in the run up to the Declaration. Fraudulently by who? Of a pandemic. There is no public health emergency except that created by our governments. An inappropriate fraudulent PCR test was used to give people the impression that they had a particular disease where they didn't. There were all normal diseases. And then what happened was in three different ways. People were treated badly through changed medical procedures that were imposed above the level of nation. Briefly, mass ventilation of people inappropriately in hospitals that led to lots of deaths. In care homes, many people were given sedatives and respiratory depressants which led to their deaths. My PhD was specifically in that area of opiates and respiratory depression. And in the community, people were denied life saving antibiotics and died of bacterial pneumonia. There's your pandemic. There is no other pandemic. And based on this lie, we were told that vaccines were coming our way and would be our savior. Two things, as I say. First, there's no pandemic, so you certainly don't need an experimental, rushed medical intervention. But secondly, even if you did, as someone who's worked in the industry for over 30 years, I am telling you it's absolutely impossible to invent, test, clinically, evaluate and manufacture and then launch on global scale a complex biomedical product. It's absolutely impossible. It's not as close, it's years wrong. The fastest record price of this was six years. And friends of mine who've worked all their lives in manufacturing of complex biological products tell me the methods development alone for the development of a reproducible manufacturing process itself takes a number of years. So whatever it is you think was done, I am telling you, there was not the development of a proper medical product. What I think happened was the advancement of materials that are intentionally toxic. And then they were sketchily, advanced and jammed into people's arms, often coerced, sometimes even mandated, with the unsurprising effect that millions of people have died. I don't have time today to explain what I think they're going to do in the future, but suffice to say, more injections are coming if we don't stop this. So, like I said, I'm skilled in the arts of rational drug discovery. So why am I saying these materials are intentionally toxic? Well, let me give you the first example. How do you think your body plays nice with itself, but when it's infected or detects a cancer, it goes to war. And the answer is, it distinguishes self things that are meant to be inside you from non self, from foreign things that are not meant to be inside you. And it is trained exquisitely to detect and attack non self foreign things. If you inject a person with a gene that encodes a foreign piece of protein, like a spike protein from a foreign organism, your body will detect that. And every single cell that takes up that material and expresses foreign protein will be attacked and killed by your immune system. Now, if you think that's advanced immunology, let me put you right. It's in the first chapter. Distinguishing self from non self is one of the foremost lessons of immunology. And every single person involved in the train of delivery of these materials to doctor's hands knew what I've just told you, they will inevitably cause injury. Then on top of that, it's not just bad enough that you're making a foreign protein, you're making a specific material called spike protein. Those materials are biologically active. That is, if you add them to human blood, for example, they start to coagulate, it clots. Those materials are biological toxins. So now you've got a genetic sequence that forms foreign proteins. That means your body attacks and kills every cell that does it. And if you should release any of that protein in your blood, it will form blood clots. If it releases it near nerves, for example, you will get one or other of several neurological defects. And of course, it's not just nerves or blood. There's a third major factor, and there are many others. But let me give you the third one. These materials are formulated it's normal to formulate drugs. These are formulated in fatty globules called lipid nanoparticles. What they do is disguise the foreign genetic information so your body doesn't see it initially until it gets inside your cells and it goes all around your body. It will glide through the cell wall as if it wasn't there. And that was the entire point of it. So that means these materials don't just go to your lymph nodes. And they certainly don't stay in your arm where they're injected. They go all around the body, including into your brain and your blood and every organ in your body. But here's the thing. Ten years ago, there were papers published, and it was well established and well known in the industry that lipid nanoparticles, lipid nanocarriers deposit their cargo, preferentially in the ovaries, and that was confirmed with the pfizer products in an animal experiment performed for the Japanese regulators. So, by design, these agents cause an autoimmune attack on every tissue. They make your body form a well understood biological toxin that can damage multiple organs in your body. And they deposited their cargoes, preferentially in the reproductive tissues of women and girls. So if you think that's by luck, then you're mistaken. There is no doubt in my mind, anyone of my caliber, and this is my peers that worked on this, absolutely understood what they were designing and manufacturing. So I think, having heard what I've just said, that there was no pandemic and the lie was maintained in order to inject people en masse, I think five and a half billion people with an intentionally dangerous substance, 17 million of whom have died so far. What do you think is happening and what do you think your role as an individual is in stopping this crime? On. Thank you for listening. -------------------------------------------- Please note that this will likely be "community noted" and Dr. Mike Yeadon may be branded as "Antivaxxer" because (as of 12 Dec 2023), the existing "official" COVID guidelines appear to still be significantly influenced by major pharmaceutical entities, and regulatory bodies continue to be potentially compromised.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Mike Eden, a former vice president at Pfizer, claims that the design of the COVID-19 vaccines was intentionally harmful. He argues that there was no pandemic and that the PCR test was fraudulent. He believes that the vaccines contain toxic materials, including spike proteins that can cause immune system attacks and blood clotting. He also states that lipid nanoparticles in the vaccines can deposit in reproductive tissues. Dr. Eden asserts that millions of people have died as a result of these vaccines. He urges individuals to recognize the alleged crime and take action to stop it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. My name is doctor Mike Eden. Probably know by now that I'm a career research scientist, biologist. I've worked in the biopharmaceutical industry for over 30 years. Famously, a former vice president at Pfizer. I left in 2011 as vice president and worldwide head of research. I was responsible for everything from idea to clinical proof of concept. In the 10 years after leaving Pfizer, I've worked as an independent. I consulted to 30 biotech companies. I also founded, led, And sold my own biotech, Zianco. And we were written up in a 2017 article in Forbes Magazine. I think it was, converting Pfizer discounts into gold, and it was written by a former Pfizer board member. So 3 years before this alleged event started, I was very well regarded in the industry. I'm going to tell you that the design of the so called vaccines was intentionally to harm people, And I'm going to give you several examples of that based on my extensive industry experience of rational Drug design. Not a single atom or molecule in a synthetic drug is in there by luck. It's in there because people chose it to be in there, And they intended certain things to flow from their choices. But just very briefly, you should know, I hope, There has not been a pandemic. Dennis Rancourt's data shows that the all cause mortality Evident data did not increase at all in the run up to the declaration fraudulently by WHO pandemic. There is no public health emergency except that created by our governments. A inappropriate fraudulent PCR test was used To give people the impression that they had a particular disease where they didn't, they were all the normal diseases. And then what happened was In 3 different ways, people were treated badly through changed medical procedures that were imposed above the level of nation, briefly Mass ventilation of people inappropriately in hospitals that led to lots of deaths. In care homes, Many people were given sedatives and respiratory depressants which led to their deaths. My PhD was specifically in that area of opiates and respiratory depression. And in the community, people were denied lifesaving antibiotics, and died of bacterial pneumonia. There's your pandemic. There is no other pandemic. And based on this lie, we were told that vaccines were coming our way and would be our saviour. Two things. As I say, first, there's no pandemic so you certainly don't need an experimental or rushed medical intervention. Secondly, even if you did, as someone who's worked in the industry for over 30 years, I am telling you, it's absolutely impossible To invent, test, clinically evaluate, and manufacture, and then launch on global scale a complex Biomedical products. It's absolutely impossible. It's not as close. It's years' wrong. The fastest record price of this was 6 years, And friends of mine who worked all their lives in manufacturing of complex biological products tell me the methods development Alone for the development of a reproducible manufacturing process itself takes a number of years. So whatever it is You think we're done. I am telling you that was not the development of a proper medical product. What I think happened was, the advancements of materials that are intentionally Toxic, and then it was sketchy advanced and jammed into people's arms, often coerced, sometimes even mandated, With the unsurprising effect that millions of people have died, I don't have time today to explain What I think they're gonna do in the future, but suffice to say, more injections are coming if we don't stop this. So Like I said, I'm skilled in the arts of rational drug discovery. So why am I saying these materials are intentionally toxic? Let me give you the first example. How do you think your body plays nice with itself but when it's infected or detects a cancer it goes to war? And the answer is it distinguishes self, things that are meant to be inside you from non self, on foreign things so they're not meant to be inside you. And it is trained exquisitely to detect and attack non self foreign things. If you inject a person with a gene that encodes a foreign piece of protein, like a spike protein, from a foreign organism, Your body will detect that. And every single cell that takes up that material And expresses foreign protein will be attacked and killed by your immune system. Now if you think that's advanced immunology, Let me put you right. It's in the 1st chapter. Distinguishing self from nonself is one of the firm, foremost essence of immunology and every single person involved in in the train of delivery of these materials So doctors' hands knew what I've just told you, they will inevitably cause injury. Then on top of that, It's not just bad enough that you're making a foreign protein. You're making a specific material called spike protein. Those materials are biologically active. That is, if you add them to human blood, for example, They start to coagulate. It clots. Those materials are biological toxins. So now you've got a genetic sequence that forms foreign proteins that means your body attacks and kills every cell that does it. And if you should release any of that protein in your blood, it will form blood clots. If it releases it near nerves, for example, you will get 1 or other of several neurological defects. And, of course, it's not just nerves or blood. There's a third major factor and there are many others but let me give you the third one. These materials are formulated. It's normal to formulate drugs. These are formulated in fatty globules called lipid Nanoparticles. What they do is disguise the foreign genetic information so your body doesn't see it initially until it gets inside your cells and it goes all round your body. It will glide through the cell wall as if it wasn't there. And that was the entire point of it. So that means these materials don't just go to your lymph nodes and they certainly don't stay in your arm where they're injected. They go all around the body including into your brain and your blood and every organ in your body. But here's the thing. 10 years ago, there were papers published, and it was well established and well known in the industry that lipid nanoparticles, lipid nanocarriers, Deposit their cargo preferentially in the ovaries. And that was confirmed with the Pfizer products in an analog experiment performed with the Japanese regulators. So, by design, These agents cause an autoimmune attack on every tissue. They make your body form a well understood Biological toxin that can damage multiple organs in your body. And they deposited their cargos preferentially in the reproductive tissues of women and girls. So if you think that by luck, then you're mistaken. There is no doubt in my mind that anyone of my caliber, and this is my peers that worked on this, absolutely understood What they were designing and manufacturing. So I think having having heard what I've just said, there was no pandemic, And the lie was maintained in order to inject people en masse, I think, 5 a half 1000000000 people with an intentionally dangerous substance, 17,000,000 of whom have died so far. What do you think is happening, and what do you think Your role as an individual is in stopping this crime. Thank you for listening.
_aussie17
Posted - November 29, 2023 at 9:53 PM
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 6:44 PM

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Two pilots incapitated in 6 days. A332 over Atlantic and RyanAir B738 A disaster waiting to happen! H/T:@otsleeel https://t.co/XPryaMY137

_aussie17
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 9:06 AM
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 9:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Whistle-blower reveals concerning information about New Zealand's vaccine payment system. Discrepancies in death dates after vaccination raise suspicions. The database administrator, in a unique position, uncovers alarming patterns. Official COVID guidelines may be influenced by pharmaceutical entities. Excess deaths from Covid jabs analyzed by experts. Full video and detailed write-up available.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Important Whistle-Blower information coming out of New Zealand - 30th November 2023. It's an hour long clip but I edited some highlights and key analysis. Please watch! ------------------------------------------------------ I was involved with building a project, helped with implementing a vaccine payment system for our providers. It's called a pay per dose system. So that means that every time someone gets vaccinated, they get a payment for it as a provider. And I helped build it, I implemented it. And when I was looking at the data, which is part of my job, I noticed some discrepancies with the dates of death, people getting people dying within a week of being vaccinated. "the chances of that occurring naturally by chance is almost impossible." "Well, as soon as the system went live, we noticed that people were dying almost straight away after being injected. So that sort of prompted my curiosity a bit, and so I dug a little deeper. And I am a scientist by nature. I love science. It's my all time favorite. I've got a master's degree in science." "Because it's a payment system and I'm the database administrator for it. I'm the only one. Because New Zealand is a small country, you can get away with one database administrator to do this. So I'm in a unique position in the world. And because New Zealand is a tier one country with really good in I.T., I was able to manage and build the system and be the only database administrator needed to look after it. In other countries like America or Britain, you'd need a whole team of people. So it would be very difficult for one person to get access to all of this information. But in New Zealand, because of its size and because it's got really good I.T, I happen to be the one." ------------------------------------------------------- Please note that this will likely be "community noted" because (as of 30 Nov 2023), the existing "official" COVID guidelines appear to still be significantly influenced by major pharmaceutical entities, and regulatory bodies continue to be potentially compromised.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses their involvement in building a vaccine payment system in New Zealand. They noticed discrepancies in the data, specifically a high number of deaths occurring shortly after vaccination. They provide charts showing the top ten batches with high mortality rates, all of which are Pfizer. They also mention the top ten vaccinators with the highest mortality ratios. The speaker questions why these deaths are happening and suggests that the vaccine should be protecting people. They also highlight spikes in deaths during flu seasons and the COVID-19 pandemic. The speaker concludes that the death rate in New Zealand has increased even after COVID-19, as shown by ongoing black lines on the chart.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right. Well, I was involved with building a project, helped with, implementing a vaccine payment system for our providers. It's called, a pay per dose system. So it means that every time someone gets vaccinated, they get They get a payment for it as a provider. And I helped build it. I implemented it. And when I was looking at the data, which is part of my job, I noticed some discrepancies with the dates, of death, people getting people dying within a week of being vaccinated. Speaker 1: So what did you notice when you first started to look At this data as you were building it? Speaker 0: Well, as soon as the system went live, we noticed that, people would die almost straight away after being injected. So That sort of prompted my curiosity a bit, and so I dug a little deeper. And I am a scientist by nature. I I love science. It's My all time favorite. I've got a I've got a master's degree in science. Oh, no but no one knows this data. Nobody but me in New Zealand has seen this data. Now I'm giving it to the world. Speaker 1: Explain why. Explain that. Speaker 0: Because it's a it's a payment system, and I'm the database administrator for it. I'm the only one. Because New Zealand is a small country, you can get away with 1 database administrator to do this. So I'm in a unique position in the world. And because New Zealand is a tier one country with really good IT, I was able to manage and build the system and as be the only database administrator needed to look after it. In other countries like America or Britain, you'd need a whole team of people. So it'd be very difficult for 1 person to get access to all of this information. But in New Zealand, because of the size and because it's got really good IT, I happen to be the the one. Speaker 1: A lot of people want to know what was my batch? What can you do to help keep us with that? Speaker 0: Okay. So what I did with the data was, look at the top Ten, batches that were had a high death count, a high mortality rate. And I put them on a chart, which you can see up there. So it's got a a batch ID, which is our internal number for a batch, but You can easily get the Pfizer batch ID from that. It shouldn't be too difficult. Speaker 1: Tell us more about that because a lot of people will say, hey, that's only the top Tien, I want to know my batch. What would you advise? Speaker 0: Yep. You can do that. There's, there's a website, find my batch for the whole world that can actually find that. And I we can list this on, a website, the whole number of batches. There are 119 individual batches Just so far, New Zealand, a 119 Speaker 1: Of the Pfizer? Speaker 0: Of the Pfizer. Actually, not of all of them because we have We have Moderna. We have AstraZeneca. We've but they're only few and far between. Mostly, it's Pfizer. Mostly, it's Pfizer in New Zealand. Speaker 1: So people can find that? Yep. Find my batch? Speaker 0: Yes. They should be able to. Speaker 1: Yes. Hello? Speaker 0: So what I did was our internal batch ID, I counted the number of vaccinated within that batch, and then I found out who was dead. Speaker 1: Well, let's have a look. Speaker 0: And so we then look at the percentage of the ratio. Speaker 1: So do we know if these are all Pfizer, the top 10? Speaker 0: Yes, they are. Speaker 1: And this is Pfizer's batch number 1. We've had 711 from batch number 1 vaccinated. 152 of those died, which makes a 21% Speaker 0: death There are different ways to look at the data. You can slice it and dice it. So another way I looked at it was, are the vaccinators themselves, what are they doing? Are we looking at some who I've got a higher mortality rate than those. And sure enough, if we look at the next one, Unfortunately, there are. So what we have here are the top 10 vaccinators Who have the highest ratios of mortality? Speaker 1: For privacy reasons, We have redacted the names of those jabbed and the names of those jabbed. Speaker 0: We have to. Speaker 1: We have. Yeah. So we've just called it Vaccinator 1? Speaker 0: Yeah. But these are individuals. These are real people. These are real numbers. This is government data. So the top v one This vaccine added 246 people, and 60 of them are no longer with us. Speaker 1: That is nearly 25%. One in 4. Speaker 0: Nearly 1 in 4 that that person's vaccinated is dying dead. And you can come up with any number of reasons for it, But this should never happen. This should never happen. If they were all doing their job correctly, if there's a normal vaccine, But we point 7. Speaker 1: And if you were arguing, okay, there was 1 vaccinator who was incompetent, not doing the job properly, That's an aberration, but look at the other numbers. Yeah. So it looks then we start to say, what is it they were putting into people's bodies? Because the uniformity is what they were putting in. Look at this one. 621 by vaccinated, the 3rd highest Vaccinated. 621, 104 people dead, nearly 17% of the people they jabbed. Speaker 0: Yes. And unless they they go around, terribly ill cancer wards and injecting people, who they know are gonna die, Then there is no other explanation for this then, and why would they give them that anyway? You know? It doesn't make any sense. The vaccine is meant to Protect those people. On the left there, the big red line, is the Christchurch earthquake event. So that is the outlier, and that's A lot of people died on that day. From there, the next line where you get more than a 120 people dying is sometime 2012. Then you get nothing for a year. 2013 doesn't have any. 2014, you got a couple. Then nothing. 2016, you got 1. Then nothing until 2018 where you get A whole bunch of whole cluster, that's probably due to a flu epidemic because always these spikes that you see, these black lines previously on the left hand side, They're all due to the winter flu season, so you gotta remember that. They all all these deaths happened June, July, August. So there in 2018, we had a a big flu epidemic. Moving on to the right, we got another one. Then The next red one, the Christchurch massacre, which was in 2019 in March. But from that, you get a a cluster in 2020, a whole bunch there. May have been another bad flu season. We don't know. But then from 2021, you see A black line there appearing, and then it's like a flick of a switch. Suddenly, the black lines get closer together, And there's more of them. Very thick black lines there. So this this one here, Peak deaths was COVID with or from COVID, but then the deaths from COVID, if you look at the Worldometer website, it correlates to that. That was the same time, and they said that over 60 people died with or from COVID. Then after that, it suddenly suddenly drops off. So after that, you only get a couple of people a day dying with or from COVID. So if you if you go back to The chart there, in that case, you would you would expect to see the black lines disappear because no one's dying from COVID anymore. Right? But you're not. Yeah. Absolutely not. You're seeing the black lines. There are more people dying than ever before. These are the biggest number of deaths we've seen in history of New Zealand. The death rate has gone up 6%, 8% year on year. Even after COVID wasn't a thing. The death rate is still going up. And that's illustrated here by these black lines which are still going on.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Full video https://rumble.com/v3yqgsf-liz-gunn-the-mother-of-all-covid-19-vaccine-revelations-data-revealed-in-th.html

Liz Gunn: The Mother Of All [COVID-19 Vaccine] Revelations (Data Revealed In This Video) FreeNZ Media writes: "Our work in releasing M.O.A.R. to data specialists and analysts and to the public throughout the world is dedicated to all the Kiwis who have lost their lives unnecessarily and p rumble.com

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Related https://x.com/NZLoyal/status/1730122459339505805?s=20

@NZLoyal - New Zealand Loyal

M.O.A.R Data Analysis @NZLoyal is joined by Dr Paul Oosterhuis (@dragonfishy) and M.O.A.R's Winston Smith to analyse this data on New Zealand's excess deaths from the Covid jabs.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Paul Oosterhuis and whistleblower Winston discuss the lack of transparency and data surrounding COVID-19 vaccines in New Zealand. They express concern about the government's handling of the vaccine rollout and the potential risks associated with the vaccines. The speakers highlight the high number of deaths and clusters of deaths in certain areas, particularly in the South Island. They call for further investigations, accountability, and a reevaluation of medical ethics. The video emphasizes the importance of transparency, truth, and informed consent in analyzing the data and rebuilding the medical profession.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Paul Oosterhuis from Australia, and I'm going to call you Winston. That's what we've called you, whistleblower, WB. You are not known to me, by your your actual name, and I want to keep it that way. I've already done the interview with you, and that has gone out. And this interview. I am recording on the eve of us putting the prerecorded data exposure interview. I'm recording this because I want to drop it just after we have put out the data. Welcome to you both. Doctor Paul, I was on an Australian podcast with you, Cafe Locked Out. That's where I met you first, And you were very passionate about learning about the data, the whistleblower's data. Tell us about that. Speaker 1: Well, I've been, an opponent. Well, I've been a proponent of vax safety, and somehow that makes you a anti vaxxer. And, the government hasn't been forthcoming with the data. There's been a lot of obfuscation, and, I've been waiting to to get solid data that we can see the true effects, and the true safety of the so called vaccine We're not vaccine. Speaker 0: So before we get into that, can you give us a brief overview of your journey through the COVID nineteen response? You, like many of us, have suffered greatly during this, haven't you, for speaking out? Speaker 1: Yes. Well, I I was an anesthetist for 32 years. I worked in anesthetics in critical care, and so I had an interest in keeping people out of hospital. And I, early on, Understood that COVID could be treated, and I I was passionate about getting the word out about early treatment. But I was also very critical about government policy on lockdowns and masks. And I, In particular, I was very concerned that children who didn't have a risk from from from COVID, We're being put at risk, unnecessarily. And I tweeted the event health minister, Brad Hazard, here in new New South Wales We have a chart of infection fatality rate by age and said ensured that these children, high school kids, who were being 24,000 who've been vaccinated on that day were not at risk of COVID, and said if there was even 1 kid that died From this 24,000, you have a signal of harm, bad hazard, and you would be culpable. Within 2 hours, I had become, I was subject to a suspension hearing, as a as a I I went to the hearing, I I gave my evidence, They they ignored it, and said, well, you're guilty of violating the gag order. And I I thought that was totally unacceptable because you cannot have informed consent, with without free discussion. People need to know both the risks and the benefits. I warned the medical council that that they were putting they were breaching medical ethics. They were breaching the law And, so I subsequently sued sued the medical counsel and the Supreme Court of New South Wales. And, They dropped my suspension, but I continue to be a a great critic of of government policy and of the synthetic gene Injections, which they're calling vaccines. Speaker 0: And in doing all of that, you became a hero to many in Australia, doctor Paul. And on that basis and on the basis of cafe locked out, Winston Smith, I'll call you. Ironically, of course, if anybody knows Orwell's book, Winston Smith, I came to you, and I said, I believe that we should have a trans Tasman connection with this important data that you are bringing not only to New Zealanders, but to the world. And I believe doctor Paul is a man to bring over to have a look at the data. What was your first what was your first impression of him when we pushed him over to New Zealand? Speaker 2: I just fell in love with a guy right from the get go. He's he's he's a beautiful human being. And, yeah, he's, he speaks from the heart, and he's He's got a lovely heart, and, yeah, I I really respect him for what he's done. I respect the stand that he took, the courage and, you know, what he had to go through, And, yeah, the just the tenacity to get it to get where he is now, it's just it's an honor to meet you, sir. Speaker 0: And I'm I'm telling you Speaker 1: it's more than neutral. Thank you. It's a great honor to meet you. Speaker 0: Yeah. Every one of those words would apply to you, Winston Smith. Every one of them. Speaker 2: Shucks. Thank you. Speaker 0: Doctor Paul, when you came to New Zealand and you saw the data for the first time. Take us into that. What was your reaction? Speaker 1: Well, I was holding back to tears, I think, was the first reaction, Because it this is not just numbers. This is names, places, dates, And it it's not anonymous. It's not anonymous. We we have been given very. We've been we've had data which has been obfuscated and and and made murky and But there are real names to each one of these and and the scale the scale of of of of of the deaths, both by side, by by vaccinator. In our interview, you you mentioned that There was a vaccine that had 404 100 deaths, and I I was blown away because that was way worse than Harold Shipman Who was the famous, doctor. So we have an a Iatrogenic democide, a a crisis. Speaker 2: And they're all unaware of it as well. They they have no clue what what they're doing. And, you know, it's, I feel sorry for them. I honestly do. It's it's genuinely, it's it's not their fault. They believe that they're doing the right thing. But, yeah, it's it's just gotta stop. And it's it's, yeah, it's not it's not the vaccinator's fault per se. It's the it's what who's telling them, and it's it's also there's a lot of things you can get into. It Could be the the batch ID, where the where the site is located, the vaccination center itself, and a million other a million other factors that might point to why those numbers are so high at certain places. But, yeah, the the data is real. It's a 100%. It's it's from the government. It's the people's data, and I I strongly believe it it belongs to them. I'll protect as many names as possible. There will be no identifiable information on there, But the dates and times and locations, I'll let the world see. Speaker 0: And that is a very important point to bring out at this stage. You had 2 rights, if you like, to weigh up. The right of privacy, the right of of Privacy of information is one that we accord great respect to in every society. But I believe, and I know that you agree with me, Winston, There is a far more important right that we must honor, and that is the right to expose criminal action by anybody, including by our ministers of the crown, who are meant to be serving the people. And that is your courage to come forward and expose that. That's extraordinary, doctor Paul, isn't it? It is an extraordinary level of courage that he's showing. Speaker 1: With without this level of transparency, it would not be clear the scale of what is going on. It it it is it and, it was hard to believe until I actually met, Winston And, and understood his involvement in setting up integral In understanding where this data came from and setting up the database and, there there's there's just no question about About the numbers that, that these that that we have a lot of dangerous, deadly batches that would not be possible if if this product was safe and effective. It's it's definitely answered. Speaker 0: Doctor Paul, can you go deeper into that? Because it is beyond any doubt that this no longer can be said to be of natural causes or by chance or this would have happened anyway, all these reasons that have been put about when people have died suddenly as a result of this jab. What does this data show beyond any reasonable doubt to you? Speaker 1: It it it shows that, there are deadly batches. Numbers that just can't be ignored, which makes it a dangerous product. There are lots of things that have that have come out already from the data and will continue to come out, but it didn't protect grandma. We we know that there are a lot of elderly people who who who who died. And The the thing, without this record level data, we wouldn't have we wouldn't have and I wouldn't have understood the time dependency, you know, Because we know exactly when the person was vaccinated and when they died, And and the proportions, you know, in some of these sites, it was worth some plain Russian roulette. These are in incredible differentials because we know exactly how many people were vaccinated in these sites on these days at these times, And that was the thing that impacted me. Seeing the lists of vaccinated this time and then 5 minutes later and 2 minutes later and 2 minutes later and then The scatter of delayed deaths. It's the delayed deaths. It that I wasn't prepared for that, and none of there's been no transparency from government about that. And without this sort of data, it that would not have been possible. Speaker 0: Winston, your comments on that. As you were amassing this bravely for the world, Was that what was hitting you as well? Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, looking at the data, that's the last thing you expect to see. It's the last thing you want to see. It's it's hideous when you look at it, and you realize that these are actually human lives. So when I actually connected the dots and, Now put the the dates of death in there. If you were scrolling through the data, ordinarily, you'd see 1 or 2 Deaths pop up when as you're scrolling through hundreds and hundreds, and that would reflect the underlying mortality rate. But then when you see a a whole bunch of them, 10 at a time, 20 at a time, 30 at a time, And then you realize it's the same vaccination center and usually the same vaccinator as well, the same person doing it. And then you look at the times between those, and you realize that 30 people were all vaccinated within 2 hours of each other in a 2 hour stretch, and now those people are no longer with us. That's heart wrenching. That is awful. And the thing is that it's they don't all die at the same time. They all die at different times. But, you know, people will start to realize there are a lot more people, old people, dying now. And it's It could be, you know, because of this. It prove me wrong. Prove this data wrong. Speaker 1: This crime couldn't couldn't have been revealed as clearly without the statute, and that's why this transparency is so important. Speaker 0: But, Paul, what would you say to somebody who who looks at it and says, but some of these are are in their eighties nineties. They simply would have died anyway. Give the answer to that from your viewing of the data. Speaker 1: It's it's just not Possible in the numbers that they have died. Speaker 2: That's exactly right. Speaker 1: Yep. It's just not possible. We've we've looked at the statistical analysis of this. Yes. Elderly people have been were largely affected. And to me, in some ways, that was reassuring that that that we weren't seeing huge numbers of young people. But it's just the sheer volume. It it it goes well beyond what you could reasonably expect. Speaker 0: And I have looked at data on people under 40, and it is shocking, Paul. I don't know that you've seen those pages because there is such an enormity of data for people in future months years to get into from this amount of of information. There will be proper scientists, ethical scientists studying this, I believe, Winston, for years to come. Years to come. Speaker 2: Well, I hope so. Speaker 0: Never happen again. Speaker 2: And let's let's hope it's real science and not the Fauci signs And that they do actually do a good job of analysis, and they're transparent and truthful. Because, I mean, the Independent. Should go with science that, you know, the Hippocratic Oath should follow and not first do no harm, and then do good. We must all abide by that. So if if If you're looking at this with an agenda to try and hide what the data shows, then No. You you shouldn't be looking at it at all. You've gotta look at it with open eyes. And I'm I'm not biased with it. I wish I wish this was not a thing, But these statistics, it's mathematics at the end of the day. And when you you calculate the properties, The the probabilities, you realize, are it's it's just off the scale. This vaccine is a killer. You know, we're talking about A 100,000,000,000 to 1 against it, not being a killer. It's just, yeah, unreal. Speaker 0: On that note, let's get into the 1st slide then and go through this with you, doctor Paul. Speaker 2: Yep. Just give me a moment. Speaker 0: And I think, while you're doing that, for me, Paul, it was In Winston, a marriage of his, absolute understanding of numbers and statistics and mathematics and the importance of those, to tell the truth, a marriage of that with his deep humanity, his deep caring. He didn't just see these as numbers any more than you did. Would you agree with that, Paul. Speaker 1: Yes. Absolutely. I mean, this this first figure, Winston noticed that Days where a 120 peep that you had deaths of over a 120 were were there were years where where This didn't happen. And and that Can Speaker 0: we bring the slide up? We haven't got the slide on the screen yet. Speaker 1: Okay. It's alright. So it'll show the Christchurch earthquake. So this go this this figure one goes back to 2012, and you can see the Christchurch, there it is, earthquake as one of the lines. And then you can see those blank spaces, That's whole years where the the there wasn't, New Zealand's not such a big country. You you expect to see A 120 people die in a single day. And each one of those lines is is is a day that exceeds that number. You can see, a flu pandemic. You can see the Christchurch massacre, as a as a red line. And and then look at the look at the clusters of 120 per dead the dead per day, since Since the, since the vaccine. It's, you you you you saw some deaths around COVID, but it's it's a solid it's so many days now, you know, day after day. It's it's it's a tragedy, you know? And and this is and this is record level data. Something dramatic has happened. And, of course, New Zealand is was in like Australia was in a unique situation in writing. It didn't have, a lot of COVID, before before the the the rollout. So, so yeah. Speaker 2: Yeah. Were were we already vaxxed before we even got COVID, pretty much? Yes. I think we were. We were we were one of the lucky con other the lucky countries that already had a vaccination program, but almost no COVID. We went for months months without COVID, I remember. Speaker 0: Yep. Yes, sir. Discuss why the one twenty number here, Winston. Austin. Just to make that clear. Speaker 2: Oh, the Speaker 0: one deaths over 1 20 Yeah. Per day. Speaker 2: A 120 people per day. It's just A number that I came up with to to show, that, you know, usually how rare it is, how rare it should be To have that many people die in one day. And if you look at the the chart there, on the left, there's, like, Paul said, there's a Christchurch earthquake, which is just The outlier. And then there's all there's nothing. 2013, not a single day where you had that many people die. Then 2014 There's 1 or 2. Nothing for 2015, 2016. Yeah. Very few and far between. And then you get a you get a big hit, a flu epidemic, or it's big up to then. I think that was July 2017. Then 2018, pretty quiet. 2019, pretty quiet. And then it starts ticking up, more or less after the vaccination rollout, which is Kinda suspicious. Speaker 0: And where it's deep black, it means so many days, as you said, Paul. Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 0: So many days are exceeding a 120. So as you said, Winston, it's like many versions of the Christchurch massacre are now happening in New Zealand. Speaker 2: It is abs absolutely not talked about not to say anything away from the Christchurch massacre, which was, you know, it was horrific. But we are seeing, an equal number of people sometimes, dying, and it's just not being talked about. It's just nothing. It's just, oh, yeah. Excess mortality. It's there's more people died in New Zealand than ever before. You know? Speaker 1: You're on Speaker 2: you're on you're you're on you're 8%. 8%. And now it's it's just nobody's nobody's talking about it. It's it's weird. And this is global as well. It's It's not just New Zealand. This is a thing that's happening in all the countries of the world. Speaker 1: Yes. I think I I I think it makes the point that a a solid massacre is going on, and and this is why it has to be addressed. Causes have to be at the store. Speaker 2: Well, this is excess mortality, and it does need to be addressed. It does need to be debated. And as, you know, Andrew Bridgeman says in the UK parliament, It might be the first debate about it, but, by god, it will not be the last. Speaker 0: And then for those who say, Paul, oh, well, those Those deaths could be due to COVID itself. Here, we have well, yes, perhaps, Winston, if you take us through this. Speaker 2: Yeah. This is the World O Meter website, which anyone can look at. And what it shows here is, the daily deaths per day, from or with COVID in New Zealand. So we have the the the peak here. That line that sticks right up This, at July 30, 2022, where there were Over 60 deaths attributed to COVID, which when you think about it, July is the the peak flu season anyway. It's it's when most people tend to die off in the middle of winter. And that's in every country. It's, nothing special about New Zealand. But on this particular day, there was over Over 60 who were said to have, you know, succumbed to COVID. So after that, It just drops off. It drops off quite dramatically. I mean, that's a big peak and a big drop down. And then after that, what we have, Pretty consistently, numbers under under 10 attributed to with or from COVID. So the the deaths from COVID, are basically there's there's none anymore. Nobody's dying from COVID. However, the mortality rate, the the the death rate, is still going up from this point. So if you look at if you look at that 2022, 23, if you look at the previous one, 2022, 'twenty 3, those thick black lines. So if you if you just superimpose those 2 together, The thick black line is happening right after peak COVID. Speaker 0: When, in fact, COVID deaths, supposed COVID deaths, had They had dropped right away. Speaker 2: Yeah. You see that's on the chart. They peaked best from COVID. They're the black line. And there's there's still more. It's still going on. Speaker 0: Take us to this green line too, the monthly Speaker 2: Yeah. The monthly data. Speaker 0: Explain that. Speaker 2: The monthly data is, The the I think, Paul, you you can speak to it better. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, it it's it's a way of representing it as a right, And and and, although it's a little bit compressed here, you can see the lack of deaths. The the on this chart on figure 1, You can see it's it's basically 0, and there's and then you it it lifts clear off 0. It it's showing the sustained whack of these 1 20 the guys one after the other. And on figure 3, you you can see its relationship to to the vaxxophone, You know? That that one Speaker 0: to that one Speaker 1: now. There's so many lines there that you can't it just seems vague. There's so many lines there that you can't you can't resolve them. So when you zoom in, you can see, quite a coincidence So, you know, I say I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a coincidence theorist. And look at the relationship to to that to that, vaccathon. Speaker 2: Yeah. So this is the chart from 2020. And as you said, if we look at the monthly one, these are the number of days within A month where you've had more than 120 people dying. So if there's no people there's no, that is over 120, the monthly 1 will be 0. That green line will be a flat line, 0. And then if there are 2 or 3 or more days Where there's more than 120 people dying, you'll get a blip. And you've got a huge blip here. And just after the waxathon, that thick black line, Those are are days and days and days where more than a 120 people have died. And it's It's, way after the vaccine rollout as well. So as you see here, these blue lines, you've got the border workers, you've got the frontline workers, elderly, and the at risk. And then July 2021. Sorry. You've got, the main rollout, and then Avaxathon. So, you know, COVID was over by this stage, but the increased mortality rate wasn't. It's only just getting started at this time. So with no with no COVID, how do you explain the increase in mortality? Speaker 1: That's right. We also had Omicron, which, by then which greatly reduced The lethality of of of of COVID, globally. So it was in a time that, COVID wasn't wasn't, a killer than it was early on, and it was at a time that, coincides with with the drive To give this injection. Speaker 0: It's very sobering. It's It's very sobering to me, even though it is statistical, mathematical, and and graph represented to me. I also see gravestones. I see families. I can feel I can feel that pressure of humans and families torn apart when I look at those lines. They represent so much more than just lines, don't they? Speaker 2: That's the hard part about looking at the status. Mhmm. No. As a as a DPA, you just see letters and numbers. That's that's your job, just a table, rows, and columns of data. And a lot of you know, it's just meaningless a lot of the time. But when then when you connect it to a a DOD, a date of death, You realize that, you know, some someone is sad at this point. You know, there's someone is hurt, and that's that's someone's mother, grandmother, grandfather, Friend, relative, whatever. It's there is sadness here, and it's getting more it's getting it's it's increasing, you know? So It's very hard to to look at this without thinking, you know, there is a lot of there is a lot of pain here. There are a lot of people who are looking for closure, and they they haven't got it from the government that's just, You know, turning a blind eye up until now. And, yeah, like, we're just gonna Make them open their eyes and see. Speaker 0: And from the government, from the mainstream media, Winston and from, you know, the mainstream medical model as well. Those outliers like doctor Paul understand Janet, but there are still many in our hospitals who are not looking at the truth of what's been unrolling in front of their eyes. Speaker 1: Yeah. I think they're saying it. I think I think there's on some level, they're seeing it because we see that in the Rasmussen polls. We're seeing it in the declining, vaccination numbers. But, of course, the concern now is the WHO wants to bring in Mandates, for future pandemics and, we have to look soberly at how we've Behaved during COVID, and the the the result of the of the response to first come around, it doesn't give me any confidence, that the international health regulations that they're changing and the the, The bringing in of the WHO pandemic treaties. We have to face the carnage of of of COVID first. Speaker 0: And the WHO pandemic treaties reach across, country's boundaries, as it were, and remove a country's sovereignty. So it's extremely dangerous, not to mention that the WHO is now funded. Its primary funder is a corporate. It's the Gates Foundation. It's Bill Gates whose name has not come through this COVID rollout with respect from a vast number of people around the world. He has lost the trust of many people in the world, including me. What would you both say to the people of New Zealand and Australia if they start to be sold a pandemic treaty run by the WHO as being a good idea for our health. What would you say, doctor Paul, first of all? Speaker 1: I would say that if you didn't like Medical martial law, which they call lockdowns. And if you didn't like mandates the first time around, It's time to make sure that your politicians know that we have to exit these treaties, that we have to exit, the WHO because we're in danger of it repeating itself, and that's why it's so important. Speaker 0: And Winston, your view? Speaker 2: Yeah. I totally agree with that. And, I'd just like to add, Who elected the who? Who are they? The United Nations body, unelected, controlled by corporates like you say, Very shadowy and sinister, and I'm not gonna go down any, you know, rabbit holes or anything like that. But I just do not like An unelected body having total control over my life, and to tell a government, oh, this is this is how it's done now. It's ridiculous. And especially the things like the WEF. I mean, who's our Schwab? Klaus Schwab? Who elected who made him the leader? Who met him? The boss of the world. He's literally a Bond villain. You just gotta hear him. I half expect him to say, I've been expecting you, mister Bond. It's just it just oozes evil. And, you know, I get very leery of, Germans talking about Elites and globalism. It didn't work out too well in 1939, and it's not gonna work out too well now. I'm very, very wary of that organization. Speaker 0: And those are crucial points by you both, but they also raise the specter of medical, medical tyranny being a doorway to governmental tyranny by the few who are the puppet masters for these paid up politicians. There is a worldwide awakening to this. Speaker 1: Yeah, Liz. This time, big brother came with a stethoscope. So it's my it's my profession that, that manifested this tyranny and and tore away, as Winston said, Do no harm. Do good. It it's it's it's torn it's torn my professional talent, and it's made it into a a device of harm, mass harm. And and we have to face up to this is not the only dataset that points to it. You know? Ed Dowd talks about it in his book, Course unknown, the actuaries see it. The insurance industry sees it. It's present in the ex excess all cause mortality Globally. So this is just further further confirmation with hard data That it's real. It's real. But there are many data points pointing to this, and we have to face up to this, This doctor, this health care related harm. Speaker 0: That must really hurt, Paul, because you are such an ethical doctor. You are what doctors should be. You really live that edict of first, do no harm, Duggood. So do you think the medical profession can come back from the crisis in which it finds itself where many doctors have potentially gone along with what they knew from the beginning was at least questionable, if not wrong. Can those doctors be brought back and and if you like, retrained back into an ethical model of medicine? Speaker 1: I think we have to rebuild from scratch. When I did the lighthouse declaration with, A couple of my colleagues, Robert Brennan and, Rosalind Lim Cook, the psychologists, we were the first, we were Early suspendings. I was the 1st, but Robert was the 2nd and Ros was the 1st psychologist. It was just A call to basic principles. This is not a high you know, in the right of informed consent, the end of censorship. You know, I faced a lot of censorship. A lot of the messages that I put out, never made it to the public because because of the census. If you don't have free discourse, you don't have science, you have an ideology, And you don't have informed consent. And bodily autonomy is the you know, is simply Medical freedom and the right to say no to to procedures being done on you without your consent. And if we don't have bodily autonomy, we're already enslaved. You know? This this is why these issues are are are crucial. Speaker 2: Wow. Speaker 0: I would go further and say if we have censorship at all, we cannot have democracy. They they are not they're not bedfellows. One rules out the other. Censorship stops any kind of real democracy in action. Speaker 1: That's right. That's why we're we're I feel like we're living in 1984. You know? This this is not 2020 was 1984, and it's been 1984 ever since. Speaker 0: Do you hold hope, though, for the medical profession? Do you think more are waking up now and the data will wake up? Speaker 1: I think people are waking up. Look. It has to stop. The this they're still giving these shots to children who don't need them and are being harmed. They're still giving these shots to pregnant women. We know that it's it's it has serious contamination issues With with, Kevin McKernan's work and now confirmed in multiple sites with the DNA contamination. We're seeing the cancer clusters, and the rising cancers that didn't happen. We're seeing the rising cardiovascular death, Heart attacks, strokes, we're we're seeing evidence of things that I warned about in 2021, you know, that We we that these shots would produce, antibody dependent enhancement or vaccine Linked, immunodeficiency. And, so it has no it it never had any, Safety studies in in pregnancy. It it it it wasn't it wasn't studied in in the high risk elderly, that we're seeing dying in this data. It needs to stop. It needs to stop. It needed to stop in 2021, but it's long overdue that it needs to stop, you know? And and that's that's what drives me. They're they're still giving this to children. They're still giving it to pregnant women. The the the governor is is still recommending these shots. The the advisory bodies which have, You know, have have been affected by corrupted by big pharma and and moneyed interest, And, it's it's leading to untold suffering. And I think that's what this data shows, that we have to stop. Speaker 0: Was there data, Winston, on stillbirths? Because Paul raises a very interesting point. I had young friends who were pregnant, And I could find no data in the early part of the rollout on breastfeeding, the risks and dangers of that, and certainly Not a data on the dangers to pregnant women and the risks of stillbirths and miscarriage. Did you come across any of that? Speaker 2: There there is no debtor, as far as I'm aware, on that. So, yeah, Difficult question. It really is. And I hope it will be answered, one day. We we can only I can only show you what I can show you, that that that is what it is. And to go back to, Doctor Paul's point about bodily autonomy, I mean, man, that is just that is everything to me, and I I absolutely, Well, your body is the most precious thing that you've got, and you should never ever be forced to undertake a procedure that you do not want just to keep your job. And when when a politician said nobody was forced, that's an absolute lie. They made you do it, and that is that is just seconding to me. So, yes, your body your body is first, And we need to ratify the the Nuremberg Accord. We need to look at it again. It's like, what came out of Nazi Germany after World War 2? You should not ever ever experiment on human beings. And yet, what do we do? What are we doing now? This is craz is this is absolutely crazy. And we've we just was coercion. There it Speaker 1: it there was there was coercion. It was clear coercion and Speaker 0: Absolutely. Speaker 1: Say that there was no coercion. And coercion obfuscates. It it it nullifies informed consent. There's no way you could say, You know, it's, it's like the difference between the consensual sexual relationship and rape, you know. It is chalk and cheese, and and and they're nullifying it, then they're minimizing it. I remember When I used the term bodily autonomy, which is just bodily freedom, the right to say no, my body, my choice, my colleagues sneered. They sneered as if I've made up a term, you know? And so that just to answer your question, Liz, is there hope for my profession? I I I I think that they have to really I think it has to be rebuilt from the ground up because they have lost their moorings totally. And, and the trust that's been lost by the public is deserved. It is deserved. And so I I until they recognize and and really look at how how far they've become onboard from From their ethics, I I would say there's no hope. We have to rebuild rebuild the healing healing profession, rebuild the regulators, rethink everything. Speaker 0: I will add in here another whistleblower from a year and a half ago, doctor, Bruce Dooley, who lives in the northern part of the South Island, came forward and told us about something called the FSMB, the Federation of State Medical Boards in Texas, in America, which rules all medical councils and medical board around the world. And it it became very clear in that interview, they are like the enforcement arm for big pharmaceutical. And then we'll start that that FSMB was set up in 1913 by Rockefeller influence. Now I'll I'll attach That interview, for people who haven't seen that. But it shows that our medical councils are absolutely fallen around the world. And Joan Simeon, the head of the New Zealand Medical Council, heads the international arm of the FSMB, which shows that New Zealand has been focused on. And this leads into the idea that we are some kind of petri dish experimental nation. I'll just drop that in there, and we'll put that underneath this interview. But let's move on now, Winston, to the next slide and see just how this experiment has played out in this country. Speaker 2: Yep. Can you see that? It's The 20 worst sites for excess deaths. So this is this is a ratio, of mortality rates. And if you if you look at the the map, you will see something which jumps out on me. Bearing in mind, 1 in 3 New Zealanders live in Auckland. There is something very unusual about that map. So what what it's shown is these sites, There are there are sites where there's clusters and the high ratio of deaths per site. And if you look Auckland, there's only 1 or 2. And The South Island, there's masses of them. You have the most sites of interest on the South Island. The most deaths are occurring on the South Island per capita. So, yeah, you've got to wonder why. What what is What is happening here? It is a it's a it's a mind blown thing. You know, Auckland is a population center, Relatively unscathed. Yet Christchurch and Invercargill and places like Gore got absolutely slammed. Speaker 0: What jumps out at you, doctor Paul, on this map? Speaker 1: Well, I wouldn't wanna be in the South Island. It it it but it it raises it ray it it makes the point that There is some serious problem with the way this rollout, was was conducted. That you, you know, that you would expect that The the the deaths would be evenly distributed and would be higher in the in the, as Winston said, in the high population areas. And we're seeing areas that are are more remote that are that are facing much, much incredibly high Rates of death proportionately. So there's a problem, and we can speculate this to the cause of what what led to this distribution Where, wherever was effective batches, wherever was effective storage and handling, We'll but but this this shows at San Jose that we have deadly batches and and and they're being distributed largely in in the south island of, New Zealand. Speaker 0: And, Winston, if you could put the cursor on the Christchurch area, that just for people from overseas, they can see that in the middle area of the South Island, That group, where we've had excess deaths, There are many sites in Christchurch, aren't there? I think it opens up to about 8 8 sites altogether. Can you Speaker 2: can you see that? Well, 10 of the top 20 are in Christchurch alone. Are you able to see that? Speaker 0: I'm gonna extraordinary. And down in the deep south, we will get into more detail in future slides on this in the deep south of the South Island, where, as doctor Paul said, it is not a populous area. There are far fewer people down there. So on the left there, we can see the total sites for jabbing New Zealanders. There were 1391. And then a cluster Winston. Just explain what a cluster means. Speaker 2: Well, what I what I define a cluster as is a group of 3 or more, In a row of people who who died from, an injection. So you could be injected within a couple of minutes of each other on a certain day at a certain time by a certain person. If if you are no longer with us, And there's a group of 3 or more, and that's a cluster. And Speaker 0: And those we have Those are those are, 71. Speaker 2: Yep. Those should be remote. Are you able to see this map? Speaker 0: We can't just see the New Zealand map. Speaker 2: Okay. Sorry. Speaker 1: We can see the map there. It's it's not expanding. And Speaker 2: Okay. See if I can, do anything about that. You share. Speaker 0: But we have 471 clusters. Speaker 2: Yep. Sorry about that. Sharing the wrong screen. Can you see that now? Speaker 0: Oh, yes. Oh, that's better. Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. Sorry. This is the interactive one. I have to go off the slideshow to see this. So When you look at, pleasant like Auckland here we go. Just drill down there. There's only only a couple of sites in Auckland. There's, 30% of the population of New Zealand live there. So, yeah, there's There's definitely questions that need to be asked about this. So you see, most of the South Island, You get nothing. The big population centers like, you've got, Speaker 0: Most of the North Speaker 2: Palmerston. Yeah. Yeah. Palmerston, New Plymouth. Inos Speaker 0: That doesn't mean there weren't deaths there. It means that Oh, yeah. Inos in the top twenty. Speaker 2: Top 20. Speaker 0: Top clusters. Yes. Speaker 2: Exactly right. But then when you go to South, you go to Christchurch, and you start zooming in, It's like, oh my god. Look at all those crosses. Speaker 0: That's extraordinary. Speaker 2: Of the top 20, and Then when you go down, Ashburton, not a big place, and then There's all Speaker 0: the hotspots. Speaker 2: Yes. These are all in the top 20 and remote areas. I mean, for goodness sakes, I mean, you got You gotta ask questions. How come? How come? Yes. And the further Invercargill. And I think the Invercargill was the worst of the lot and places like Gore. Gore had 2 2 sites in the top twenty, a little place like Gore, and then in in Chicago, if we zoom down on there. What do we see? Speaker 0: And Gore has almost it is a tiny population to have 2 sites with excess deaths. Speaker 2: Yes. It's it's 0.2% of the population. So it's, yeah, a very small population. Yeah. In Chicago. I can't get it now, but, there's one site called the Queen's Outreach 1, And it's got a cluster of 51. So that means 51 people died, and they're all within 2 hours of each other. And it's it's unbelievable. And it's, like, this this should be an inquiry. It's, like, what what exactly happened on that day to cause this? Because 51 people dying who were all injected at the same time. They didn't all die at the same time, but they were all injected at the same time. Now no longer with us, as you've got to ask some questions about that. It's like you're sitting on a bus with a group of people, and you're one of 51 on the bus. And then a year later, You are the only one that survived out of the whole bus. It's like the chances the chances of that Oh, so remote. It's, you know, it's it's almost impossible, that sort of statistician would say. Almost impossible. But the the real odds are, like, you know, trillions to 1 against. So that that basically points to, It's if nothing else, Occam's razor, when all when you eliminate all of the factors, what are you left with? What is what is the fundamental underlying cause of this. And the only thing that is left logically and scientifically is the vaccine itself. There's no other cause. Speaker 1: And we've been and we've been told it's climate change, it's going to sleep in front of the television, it's, Every sort of ridiculous coincidence, and the thing that's unique about this dataset is that I think it should should show anyone, that this this is an unsafe product that had multiple, multiple bad batches that led to Unnecessary deaths. And there's no way it could have happened if it was safe. Speaker 0: Let's from both of you, before we move from this slide, There's 1 country, and the data, you know, is from this 1 country. Now put it in the context of its relevance to other countries around the world. I want your views on how important this data set, doctor Paul, is in your mind for showing other countries what may be going on there even though they may not yet have the dataset that we now have thanks to this brave whistleblower. Speaker 1: It's it's not isolated to, New Zealand. This is this is a phenomenon which is is doubtless happening all around the world wherever these products have been used. And as more whistleblowers come forward, with with record level data, We will see it. And this is the thing. It's been hidden. It's it's been hidden because my initial Thought was you know, you you have a date of vaccination and you'd expect the deaths to happen and certainly a lot do happen early and within the 1st 2 weeks, but what was the surprise was, All these delayed deaths, and there's no way if you didn't know that they'd all got the shot in In a particular place, in a particular day, with a particular batch, there's no way you would have seen this. So hats off to to Winston for this because, it it makes the point very clear that, we need an inquire we need inquiries, we need to stop the shop. Speaker 0: We need multiple inquiries in every country around the world now. Winston, what what is your Desire. What is your wish to come from this crucial data? Speaker 2: Yeah. Lots of things, really. I want more whistleblowers to come forward. Definitely. This this is a thing. There are other databases around the world. New Zealand isn't the only system in place where we have this data. It's it's everywhere. It'll be in all, Western countries. They will have this data. They just have to be brave enough to get it out And show the people. And, yeah, let's let's have a debate about it. Let's have an open discussion. Prove prove the data wrong. You know, it's we're we're all up. We're all open. We're all up for, you know, criticism, whatever. Bring it on. Show show us where we're wrong with the data. What is it we're missing? How how does this fit into the norm when you're looking at a 100,000,000,000 to one chance? Is that normal? No. Not when there's only 2,200,000 people in New Zealand, and it would take 1 vaccinate, a 38 years vaccinate in 247 nonstop to come up with a similar sized dataset on a cluster of 10. Not 51, 10. So the chances of it not being this, impossible. So, yeah, we've we've Speaker 1: seen p values out in the same. We'll talk about p Speaker 0: values in a moment. Just a correction there. This database contains 2,200,000 New Zealanders, but there are 5, I think, 3,000,000 in New Zealand. That's the population Speaker 2: we have. 2 something at the last count that I saw. That's on another slide. But yes, this is not the only system in in the Ministry that I work for. It is probably the biggest, But it's it's a system that I was involved with right from the get beginning. I was, helped build it, implement it, wrote some of it, supported it. So it's I know I know this data. I know this data. Speaker 0: Can you tell us something more about about this system that you built because other countries let's hope, Winston, that other politicians in other countries will stand up like Andrew Bridgen and demand inquiries and that they can then use this sort of, this sort of entry point. What was this data about that you The Speaker 2: unique the unique thing about this data is, it it is a payment system, basically. And it's a it's a we pay for each dose that is administered by the, providers, the health care providers. So they they set up these centers, vaccination centers. They perform a load of vaccines. They they record all this Data in amazing detail, by the way. It's all high-tech stuff. So even the time when the the needle goes into the arm is recorded, When the needle comes out of the arm, it's also recorded. So vast amounts of highly accurate quality data is encapsulated in this system. And it's for every single dose that is administered, the providers get a payment of 35 dollars or $40 depending on, you know, if it's after hours or public holidays, things like that. And, Speaker 0: yes, essentially, $60, $100. I've heard a wide variety of money making. Speaker 2: Yeah. It is there is a financial incentive, Definitely for this. So you think, you know, if you if you're a provider and you're getting paid $40 a shot, what is it in your best interest to do? 1st, do no harm. I'll just get those needles in as many arms as possible and get the money. That Speaker 1: that's the That's the thing about this, unique thing about this data, just how much information is there. You know, we've we've up up to now, we've been positing this data from murky datasets And and putting it and and we virtually know what the person had for breakfast. You know? It's the the the high level of data. We know we know their date of birth. We know. Yeah. It's just incredible. It's incredible. And and that's why I think it's, it's gonna be a great resource for finding out what went wrong and why it's just so incredibly powerful, and makes the point that this shot has to stop. Speaker 0: We won't say their names yet because, they've asked us to keep them private. But You have sent this data to overseas statisticians as well, haven't you, Winston? Speaker 2: Yep. Well, I'm not a statistician by trade. I'm not a data analyst. And I do know a bit of maths. I've got a scientific background. I know computers a lot, know databases a lot. But, yes, to to get some validation, It's easy enough to send over a set of redacted data. You don't have to mention names. You can You can redact the sites. Even you just said, you know, site a, site b, that sort of thing. You know, vaccinator 1, vaccinator 2, that sort of thing. You can hide all the identities you want, and you keep, you know, a date of birth, which gives you an edge. And, and, you can then do all sorts of analysis at that stage. It just becomes data. It's just, a question of doing some statistics on it. So you send over this data, and, Yeah. People will look at it and say, well, this is statistically significant. This this, cluster here, This should never happen in the size of the dataset. You know, 2,200,000 is the the the number of individuals who have been on this system. I think that the total number of vaccinations per se about this, or transactions is over 4,000,000, but 2,200,000 actually actual people are on the system. And from that, you can You can extrapolate all sorts of stuff when you're looking at stats. It's just purely a stats exercise. And you say, well, If this is the the underlying mortality rate for this age group of people, then the chances of this cluster here happening, Almost 0. And that's just one example. You know, there's there's multiple clusters. There's clusters everywhere. There's clusters of 10, 20, 30, 40. It's yeah. So when you add all that together, you're looking at an impossible event. And, yeah, that's what they've come back with. Yeah. There's there's there's some amazing information in here, and I cannot get all of it out. It would take me a lifetime to do that. So that's why I'm I'm relying on people from, you know, universities, academics, whatever. Have a look at it. Have just look at the redacted data and just see it as a statistical exercise. You don't have to mention, you know, these are These are people who just have, like, 2 dates and say, what are the chances that this happens? You know? So it becomes a yeah. And It's it's gonna be interesting. What's what comes out of this will will be interesting. I mean, it's already Mind blown stuff. Right? I get that. But there's a lot of data in here to unpack. We're only just at the start of it. And this is just 1 place in the world. And, hopefully, It'll come out that there are other places with similar data that they can share. Speaker 0: That you your heroism will inspire others. Absolutely. Speaker 2: Just let's hope. But, it comes out because people need to know. This is These are human beings. These are people's lives. We shouldn't we shouldn't treat people like this. Speaker 0: Doctor Paul, what is a, a a p number that you referred to before? Speaker 1: Well, in in statistics, you you can never say that something is, a 100, certain, or impossible. It's it's always cussed in in terms of probability where 0, you're approaching 0, which is impossible, or approaching 1, which is certain. And and some of these p values are have got such large negative exponents. They're such Tiny fractions that there was close to 0 as I've ever seen. You know, just incredible how, If this was safe, if there weren't clusters, if if this wasn't a real, a real event. You wouldn't be seeing these sort of numbers. Speaker 0: So p value, just just briefly, is Speaker 1: So so It's a probability. This is a probability. So like in a study, you might say this effect is real if if the p value is 0.05, which means that If he did, a 5% chance, a a 5% that this result appeared by chance Or 0.01, a 1% chance. So if you did a a 100 studies, maybe this result would happen in one of the studies. Now we've got 0.0000. So many zeros that, you know, in the world of probability, it's as close to impossible, as as you can. But like I say, it's always couched in those terms in terms of statistics. Impossible that Speaker 0: it would be caused by a natural event. There is Speaker 1: By chance. Help by chance. Speaker 0: By chance. Alright. Let's move on to the next slide. This is very helpful. What have we here, Winston? Speaker 2: Okay. Can you see that? Yes. So, yeah, these are the top sites. Oops. And it's got the number of, Deaths within that site and the total number of vaccinations and then the ratio. So we just divide 1 by the other, come up with the ratio, which is percent, And the underlying mortality average mortality rate for New Zealand, 0.75%. Just bear that in mind. So what we see here, these these places, these vaccination sites, We have the top one there, top of the chart, 31% mortality, nearly 32%. So it means Almost 1 in 3 people who went to this place or were in this place, No longer with us. Speaker 0: They were in this place, and they received the vaccinations. And a third of them Speaker 2: Now they got yeah. Now we're gone. The other one, 30%, 30%, 29%, 28%. These These are huge mortality rates. Absolutely huge. And the other thing that we We talked about the South Island, but we didn't mention is that, Neli, all of these sites All of these sites are mobile sites, which is another question that needs to be asked. What is happening with the mobile sites? Why so many why so many deaths from mobile sites? Explain what's the time in the register. Speaker 0: Mobile? What's your Speaker 1: definition of mobile? Speaker 2: They they go they go around to rest homes, nursing homes, places like that, with the the COVID vaccine in a in a truck. It's it's gotta be specially treated and handled and all there's a whole protocol around it. So they they go to all these, retirement villages and whatnot, and they will just then go and inject, vaccinate all the residents there. So that's what the sort of mobile site is. Speaker 1: Yeah. They were going to schools with these mobile sites as well. You know? Speaker 2: Schools as well. Speaker 1: And look at the numbers. You know? 800 Queen's Park Medical, 837 vaccinations, 253 of those are not with us anymore. Yeah. It's, Speaker 2: That's horrifying. These are these are questions that need to be asked. And, you know, I've said it before, we we shouldn't shoot down. We need to shoot up these places. You know, we've gotta look at who is responsible for this at the end of the day. We we need to point upwards. It's The politicians who mandated it, it's it's the drug companies themselves that made it and never did any, you know, proper testing on it. Those are the ones who are really responsible. It's not it's not the sites themselves per se. Speaker 1: I I know that, There's an army of trolls and and and paid workers who who who constantly, argue. What whatever, whenever you raise a safety issue or an issue of corruption, there's a vast army of paid people to to pay cover for it. This is why I'm you know, you look just look at this, and you can see, that, it's not gonna be easy to cover this. It's not it's not to sick signal out these thoughts, but just to make the point that This will not be easy to cover. Speaker 2: No. You can't. These these mortality rates are off the chart, so they They can't be explained under normal circumstances, so they have to be held to account. And, you know, these these people who have these jobs to say that, oh, you know, it's everything's normal. Nothing to see here. Move along. Move along. It must absolutely suck to be them. I feel So bad for them to have that kind of attitude and that kind of life. At the very least, they're complicit to it. And if if they know what's really going on, and yet still the narrative that they give is to take the vaccine, if they know in their heart That it is a killer, and yet they're still telling people to take the vaccine. A shame on you. Speaker 0: Shame on them. And one thing I would want to come out of this interview is this. Please, if you are watching this, Can you send it and send it in vast numbers to your local newspaper, your national newspapers in mainstream media and demand that they look at this unequivocal data so that they will no longer hold up the government lies and the government and pharmaceutical, misleading information that we were given from them. I would ask you to demand of your mainstream media outlets that they start telling the people the truth. Let's move on to the next slide, Winston. Speaker 2: Yep. Good luck with us, by the way. Yes. So this is the these are the batch numbers that we have. So we don't have the actual Pfizer batch numbers, but we can We could get that from official information requests. I'm sure people are entitled to know which batch of the vaccine that they were injected with. That should be a fundamental right of information that we all have. So we've got our Internal system batch IDs, which do correlate to the actual Pfizer batch IDs. So you've got, The batch ID, you've got the total vaccinated and total death count, and the ratio is similar format to before. So you see from batch ID number 1, you've got 711 who were vaccinated, and 151 of those and 152 are unfortunately now dead, which gives you a ratio of 21.38%. So it's 1 in 5 Who were vaccinated by batch number 1, now no longer with us. Speaker 0: Can you take us through the next few lines there? Yep. 2nd part is batch 8. Speaker 2: Yep. So it's it's the batches were rolled out sequentially in time order. So you would expect the the earliest batches to have the highest death count just just because they were the first ones rolled out. And it's also those are the batches that are gonna be dose number 1 and dose number 2 because everyone was dozed up with the 1st batches. Right? So after after that, the higher the batch number, the higher the dose number. So it's basically the correlation is the lower the batch ID, The lower is the dose number that is gonna kill you. That makes sense. So there's a and if it was a sequential thing, it would be, like, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, But it's it's not. You get a a batch number 8. So you've got a a whole, you know, batch number 2's in the middle there somewhere. 3, not there. 5 isn't even on there. Speaker 0: Could we go through batch number 8? So you have 221 total vaccinated. You have 38. That gives a ratio of what? Speaker 2: 17 17%. And, you know, bearing in mind the underlying mortality rate, 0.75. And these batches, they're administered across the board. There's no specific age range to them, So they should reflect the general New Zealand population. And if they reflect the general New Zealand population across all ages, Then the mortality rate should be 0.75. Wow. Speaker 0: And instead, for line for batch three. We've got what ratio there? Speaker 2: 15.48%. Speaker 0: And I think the key line here, doctor Paul, is That line down the bottom, could you just read that out? Chances. Speaker 1: Chances of these batches not being a killer are a 100,000,000,000 to 1. Speaker 2: Wow. I got that from a statistician, so it's it's verified. This is a thing. It's not just me. I didn't just say that. That's from one of the world's leading statisticians. He looked at the data and said, This is not a chance. This is this is a thing. Speaker 1: So it's not 1 it's not it's not 1 batch. It's batch after batch after batch after batch after batch. That's that's how you get to these ridiculously, unlikely results. Speaker 2: I mean, a 100,000,000,000 to 1. 2,200,000 people in the system. You know? There's not a 100,000,000,000 people in New Zealand or even the world. You know? It's just these are crazy numbers. Speaker 0: A 100,000,000,000 to one means you'd have to inject a 100,000,000,000 to get Speaker 2: Yes. These results. Yes. These results. Yeah. Speaker 0: This is crazy. Paul, your reaction to this, Your your your medical background must be shuddering. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, These ratios are incredibly high, you know, and yet we still hear echoes of safe Ineffective, safe and effective, safe and effective. There is no way that these, can be safe and effective when they have batch after batch after batch, which is killing such a high proportion of the people who have received. And people should be very, very concerned, and should demand that that it stop. Speaker 0: Absolutely. And beyond that, demand that those who rolled this out, particularly if they knew this, Even if they didn't, they they were negligent not to know this. Those in government who kept insisting on this need to be held accountable in our courts of law, in my opinion. What do either of you say to that? Speaker 1: I agree. I agree. Accountability is is something that I've been Talking about since 2021, that's what I warned the event health minister. This is why I'm so grateful, for this data, it's time for accountability, and it's time for it to stop. Speaker 0: Let's move on to the next slide, Winston. Speaker 2: Yep. Yeah. Just to Echo. I'm totally a 100% in favor of that. Some the people do need to be held accountable, and the the people need to see that. There needs to be Justice needs to be done. So we we will we will get there. This slide is vaccinate names, same format as before, So I've redacted the names of the Vaccinators. These are the the top ones. And you see Vaccinator 1 there. They Jabbed 246 people. Sixty of them are now no longer with us. That's a percentage of 24.39%. That means 1 in 4 that they injected died. 1 in 4. That's like like Paul's analogy, Russian roulette with a revolver, but only 4 chambers, 1 in 4. And moving down, the 2nd highest, 22%, close to 1 in 5. And on and on it goes. It's just, and these are big numbers as well. This is not, this is not a statistical anomaly. If the higher the number you get, If the number's over 200, you can discount SKUs. So there's 1682, 239. I'm looking at the middle one v five, 14.21%. A huge ratio. So, yeah, these these this might be related to sites and batches. There's, like, a a ton of work that needs to be done on this, There's a ton of questions that need to be asked. Speaker 0: Will you be putting this redacted data out for the world's Population to see, or at this stage, are you going to focus on the scientists and the statisticians? Yeah. Speaker 2: I'll give it to the scientists and statisticians first just to so that, you know, it's it's protecting the those involved as much as possible at this stage. Just so it's a it's a it's an exercise in statistics. It's gotta be seen that way. And there's there's no bias involved. It's just this is what it is. Speaker 0: I would advocate in the end for it to go wider than that because there are many very astute people who have sorted out a lot of information for themselves in the last few years. It's incredible the number of self educated and very awake, very aware human beings around the world now who've had to analyze and work out through the mountain of lies they've been given, what the truth is. Speaker 2: And absolutely, this this is government data. It's a 100% accurate As far as I can tell, and it is yeah. It's government, so they cannot deny it. They cannot deny that this Data exists. It is your data. And, yeah, it needs to be analyzed to the nth degree so that we can get as much out of this as possible, And then make sure that we never go through this hell ever again. Speaker 0: So in the long run, would you put it out to the wider Population Winston, would you consider that? Speaker 2: Yeah. Absolutely. Yeah. It's there for it's the public's data. It's there for their consumption. Alright. Speaker 0: Let's move Speaker 2: on. I I want it to be seen by all the the Harvard people, the Oxford people first so that that they can get a clear clear shot of it, and then they can come up with, prove me wrong. Yeah. Let's have a let's have it out there. Speaker 0: I'd love Jay Batacarya from Stanford to have a look at it too. Speaker 2: Stanford. Whatever. Yeah. Yep. Absolutely. So the next slide. Yeah. This was this was, basically, the chart before the the map before that. We saw the South Island. So this is the population breakdown by location. Let me just move my thing. So I concentrated, I focused just on Auckland, Christ church, Invercargill and Gore, because that was, like, the the total the skew of the South Island with Gore having two Sites of interest, and Invercargill having the biggest one, and Christchurch having over half of them. So if you look at it normally, the population, How it breaks down by each population center would look like this. So if you've got Auckland here, you've got your population 1,600,000, which is, basically, 1 in 3 of New Zealanders live in Auckland. Christchurch population, 7.7%. And you've got Invercargill, 1.1. GORE right at the bottom. 0.2% of the population of New Zealand live in GORE. Then the rest of New Zealand is 59%. So that's just basically a population breakdown, the most current stats I could find. The next one, what we're looking at, It's a distribution of the worst the top 20 worst sites would be under normal population distribution. So under on the left hand side, If if it was a normal sort of thing, you'd see, Auckland sites. You'd have between Six and seven, just because of the the size of Auckland, our biggest city. Christchurch, you'd have between 1 and 2 sites in the top twenty. In Vercargill, you'd have 0, essentially, 0.22. And GORE sites, Yeah. Forget it. Gore should not be on this, and the rest of New Zealand should have between 112 sites of interest. But what you actually see, what the Actual data shows on the right hand side, you've got the actual distribution of the top 20 worst sites. Christchurch, over half. Now compare that to the left hand side. Christchurch has got 10 sites, which are in the top 20 alone. The rest of New Zealand, you've got 5. Auckland, you only have 2. Our biggest city, only 2 sites of interest. The same as Gore. 4.2% of the population with 2 sites, the same number as Auckland. Questions? Invercargill, you've got the worst the worst of the lot, the worst cluster of the lot. Fifty 50 people injected within a couple of hours. Now no longer with us. Speaker 0: That is extraordinary. And I think Gore had only about So it has only about 13,000 people. Yep. And look at its representation there. Yep. What is this telling us? This is what we just don't know yet. But were as you said, doctor Paul earlier, were dirty batches sent down there? Were wrong batches, experimental batches? Was it poorly handled. We just don't know what this is actually throwing up, do we? Speaker 1: No. But we're we're seeing lightning striking in places like Gore. Lightning that just can't be explained. Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 0: What is This this tragedy Speaker 2: is unfolding down there. The the people in Gore and Invercargill are probably just asking, you know, what is happening here? They've been devastated. They must know what's going on. Speaker 1: And the worst thing is they're being gaslit by the Yes. By politicians and by their doctors and being told everything's fine here. There's nothing to see. Speaker 2: Nothing to see. Speaker 1: Come and get come and get your next Sure. Speaker 2: Yep. And, Speaker 1: there is something to say here. Speaker 2: Absolutely. There is. So, Speaker 0: yeah, Winston. What would you what would you say should be done about this? We need this to be front and center in the inquiry, don't we? Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely. I think, yeah, we definitely need a government inquiry about this. There's a lot of questions need to be asked and, A lot of questions. I can think of a few off the top of my head, like, how is it how is it transported down there? Why is Auckland different? I mean, it's an arduous journey down to places like Gore on the South Island. What were the what were the storage facilities like? You know, because because this vaccine has to be handled extremely carefully. I mean, even Pfizer Give a whole list of instructions that, you know, you cannot you cannot store it out of this temperature range. And if you do, you can only use it for how long. And it's it's It's unbelievably delicate how this vaccine is. You know, if you if you go outside any of those parameters, You don't know what you're dealing with. You know, as if the vaccine is stored at room temperature for a certain length of time, They say it's unusable, but, you know, what what would happen if you actually did use it? Speaker 0: But, Winston, you looked up earlier. You looked up, temperature care for vaccines. Tell us about that, what what your Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, this is anyone can do it. Just do a Google search on, the Pfizer COVID vaccine temperatures, And you'll get a whole list. This is a Google search, a whole list of all government unofficial websites all over the world, you know, MedSafe, whatever, NHI America, the the New Zealand ones, Yeah. British ones. And they will all say different things. They all say different things, how it should be stored and how it should be handled and for how long. It's yeah. And I can Speaker 1: This was a noble technology. This was a noble technology. Speaker 2: Okay. In each country, it's gotta be handled differently. That's a bit weird, isn't it? And it's it's it is strange. Yeah. Gobbledygook. Speaker 1: It's it's unlike it's unlike anything we previously called saying it's one of the things I told the medical council at my hearing in 2021 that it's been called a vaccine, But this is a totally new technology. And as a totally new technology, we have no long term safety data. And, the lipid nanoparticles, also, you know, it's The the storage is vitally important for them because they can clump and, and and and they can behave very differently if they're not handled just so. And, I think we may be seeing evidence of how important that, it it was handled just so. And yet they went ahead and treated it as if it was, an understood known commonplace technology. No. It was an entirely novel technology that had never been unleashed on a large scale. It raises serious questions. Speaker 0: Absolutely. And and beyond that, I think, you know, at the other end of the spectrum from the poor handling potentially of the vaccine, One has to ask the bigger questions. Was this a form of a hit on the South Island of New Zealand? Was there some experiment on different parts of New Zealand with different dosages being carried out. There are there are many Kiwis now who are wondering, as I said earlier, if we are not deemed an experimental population by people like those who run the WHO and the WEF and the UN. And there are many Kiwis pushing back on this now. Any comments on that from either of you? These are things that, as yet, we cannot prove, of Yeah. Speaker 2: It's more like the WTF, isn't it, at this stage? And they're they're all perfectly valid questions. And, yeah, the the the people on the South Island deserve answers because this is this is a terrible, terrible thing that's happened to them. Speaker 1: This is like a second earthquake in Christchurch. You know? Yeah. What it what is it about cross church? It's terrible. They've suffered enough. Speaker 0: They have. They've suffered enough. And we all have suffered enough in New Zealand, in Australia, and around the world. So your final thoughts from both of you. If we can just bring the screen back to full screen, Winston. Yep. I'd like to to finish this interview with all of you. Yes. Wonderful. It's been it's been such an honor to talk to you both, and it's been really enlightening. This calm way of unpacking, In fact, devastating information, I think, will help a lot of people come to terms with what is just so, unpalatable in the end. But your final comments, doctor Paul, from this whole experience of being involved with the whistleblower and his courage. Speaker 1: Yes. It's it's undoubted. It's it's it's it's very humbling to be involved, in this project. As difficult as it is to see this material, I, I think we all want people to be safe, and and to be free. And only only by transparency And openness, will we be able to achieve that? Only by eliminating censorship Will will we return to democracy? Because I think we've strayed too far. And I I'm sure we all pray that The the benefit will come from this, and that harm the harm will stop. And then we will come back to a sane, rational Society. Speaker 0: Beautifully said, and and your thoughts, Winston. Speaker 2: Yeah. I meant to that. That was that was amazing, Doctor Paul, thank you. What I think I think we've strayed from a road and we're done in a dark We're in a dark place now. And the the further down this road we go, the harder it's gonna be to get back to where we should be. And We we need to do exactly what you say. We need to we need to reassess, and we need to we need to changed the way we've been doing things. This has been a nightmare. The last 2 years have been an absolute nightmare. It has been, Like, gone through all worlds 1984. It's like living, a novel, you know. It's It's fiction, but it's real. And it's like, this, these, these things should not mandate lockdowns enforced, you know, to go on holiday. You had to be injected. And and the the whole Orwellian doublethink, It's like, oh, no. You you can't this is not true because we tell you that it's not true. The the The ministry of truth. You know, the prime minister said that we are the single source of the truth. It's like, no, you're not. Come on. And the the whole thing about science. We are the science. The speed of science is a no. Science is science is science. It's about being skeptical and curious and, you know, just wondering about the Earth and being open to Half discussion. Freedom of speech. Yeah. Yeah. I might disagree. You might disagree with me. I would die in a hill to protect your right to say that, Whatever you wanna say. If you wanna get injected 50 times, haven't seen all the data, then, yeah, sure. Go ahead. You know? But I have a right not to do that, and you should respect my right as I respect yours. So what what I want out of this, in a nutshell, is just 2 words, and I've said that right from the start. Never again. Never again this happens. Not for my kids. Not for anyone's kids. This is just No. It stops now. Speaker 0: That's extraordinary. My final words to both of you, you, as a as a woman wanting to see a better world for my children's children, You 2 men give me great hope. We have needed male leadership. Many women stood up at the beginning and spoke out. To see the courage of both of you, to see the willingness to stand up and take whatever comes at you and tell the truth anyway is what we need in this world, and I'm going to reinforce what Winston asked. Please, would more whistleblowers come forward and do what both of these men have done. But both of you, you, Paul, as a doctor, and you, Winston, for your sheer courage and honesty, you give me great hope for a far better world to come. Thank you both. Speaker 2: It'll come. Thank you.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Further write-up and fully transcribed video here https://www.aussie17.com/p/new-zealand-government-data-administrator

New Zealand Government Data Administrator who worked on Vaccine Payment System Exposes Shocking Data on Vaccine-related Deaths In a revealing interview with Liz Gunn, a New Zealand government data administrator identified as Winston Smith has come forward with startling claims regarding the consequences of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in New Zealand. Winston Smith emphasizes that he is not an anti-vaxxer. He clarifies that he has been vaccinated in the past and has aussie17.com
_aussie17
Posted - November 27, 2023 at 1:26 AM
Saved - November 27, 2023 at 1:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Slovakia's newly elected Prime Minister, Robert Fico, criticized the consequences of mass vaccination with untested experimental vaccines in a speech on November 19, 2023. He also opposes expanding the World Health Organization's authority. Fico expressed concerns about the media, NGOs, and progressive forces pushing their agenda, suppressing differing opinions on COVID vaccination. He plans to investigate the government's actions during the pandemic and rejects the idea of compulsory vaccination. Fico believes that pharmaceutical companies are behind the push for mandatory vaccination and doubts that the Slovak political parties will support strengthening the WHO's powers.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨🚨 During a speech on November 19, 2023, Slovakia's newly elected Prime Minister Robert Fico condemned what he called the consequences of mass vaccination with untested experimental vaccines! He will also be rejecting expansion of the World Health Organization's authority! -------------------------------------------- In the elections, the people simply rejected a smaller new concept by the media, non-governmental organizations and, unfortunately, by the force of pushing of progressivism, gender ideology, free market and deadly enmity against anyone who has a different opinion than they should. If someone had a different opinion about covid vaccination, they were dangerous to society. The media covered the opening, you remember, and now I quote that everyone unvaccinated should squeal in pain like a pig. It is also necessary to use force if someone rejects the policy of excommunication. And today it appears that our free view on vaccination and government measures in the fight against covid, which grossly violates human rights, was correct and justified. One study after another confirms the scandalous consequences of mass vaccination with untested experimental vaccines. Yes, I confirm as party leader and as prime minister that I will support the efforts of some politicians of the new government coalition to politically assess what the government was up to in 2020 to 2021 and look at the financial side of extensive, often completely meaningless purchases medical devices and vaccines. I also declare very clearly that the direction of Slovak social democracy will not support the strengthening of WHO's powers at the expense of sovereign states in managing the war against the pandemic. I will say that only unscrupulous pharmaceutical companies could come up with such nonsense, which began to perceive the resistance of some governments against compulsory vaccination. Under the Constitution of the Slovak Republic, the validity of such international agreements in favor of the WHO requires the approval of the National Council of the Slovak Republic. And I do not believe that the sovereign Slovak political parties will express such approval and certainly not his MPs. ---------------------------------------------

_aussie17
Posted - November 26, 2023 at 12:36 PM
Saved - November 27, 2023 at 1:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi's powerful address to the German Parliament exposes the dark side of vaccination. He highlights the influence of money, elites, and politics in promoting vaccines. Shockingly, plasmid DNA contamination has been found in vaccines, yet approval hasn't been withdrawn. Vaccination-related heart disease, including fatal myocarditis, has been scientifically proven. Those who claim vaccines are safe are either ignorant or evil. This information challenges existing guidelines influenced by pharmaceutical entities. Full transcript available for local translations. (499 characters)

@_aussie17 - aussie17

💥💥💥💥💥 Must watch if you have 30 mins! Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi's emotional address to the AfD faction at the German Parliament receives a rousing standing ovation and thunderous applause (Nov 12, 2023!) Highlights------------------------------------------ "...The vaccination turned out to be the greatest blessing for the money and world's elites, for the pharmaceutical industry and politics. They could pursue their own interests, under the common slogan "Everything for public health", "everything for the well-being of the general public". To achieve this goal, they created the WHO. This non-democratically elected people, basically a private association that is in the process of gaining power over the healthcare system in the 190 Member States" "Kevin McKernan (@Kevin_McKernan) discovered that this crucial step of removal of plasmid DNA had not been carried out conscientiously. Huge amounts of plasmid DNA have been found in packaged form. This ensured their successful delivery to the cells. Kevin's discovery has now been confirmed in several other laboratories, Also in Germany. Large amounts of DNA contamination were found in all 27 batches examined so far. Four weeks ago, the Canadian medical authority even confirmed the discovery of plasmid DNA. However, the authority does not see this as a sufficient reason for to withdraw the approval. By the way, question for the interested public, has the responsible German authority, the Paul Ehrlich Institute of the Federal Ministry of Health carried out reliable scientific measurements? Question, answer, no. Not to this day." "Who hasn't heard about the mysterious sudden cardiac deaths occurring around the world? They are just the tip of an iceberg. Heart disease caused by vaccinations is on the agenda of young and old alike. Fortunately, to save the honor of German science, well-known pathologists stood up and carried out the world's first research work, who discovered the connection between vaccination and severe organ damage. Professor Arne Burkhardt, who recently tragically died in an accident, and his dear friend Professor Walter Lang, who spoke to you today. Dr. Michael Mörz in Dresden and the world-famous Professor Peter Schiermacher, director of the Institute of Pathology at Heidelberg University. Thanks to their work, it is now scientifically proven. And so it says in this work from Peter Schiermacher's group, Literally, it has been proven beyond a doubt that vaccination can lead to fatal myocarditis." "Anyone who praises RNA vaccines as safe and effective, Anyone who claims that vaccination rarely causes serious side effects is either incredibly ignorant or infinitely evil. And they ar committing a crime. Just like everyone who actively or passively pursues and supports this vaccination. Because it is now scientifically proven that vaccination can only have negative effects and this to a life-threatening extent." -------------------------------------------- Please note that this will likely be "community noted" because (as of 26 Nov 2023), the existing "official" guidelines appear to still be significantly influenced by major pharmaceutical entities, and regulatory bodies continue to be potentially compromised.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Professor Doktor Sugarid Bhakti discusses the role of vaccinations in improving life expectancy. He argues that while vaccinations have played a smaller role than commonly believed, they have been beneficial for the pharmaceutical industry and politicians. He explains the process of RNA vaccines and highlights the potential dangers associated with them, including long-lasting production of foreign proteins and DNA contamination. He calls for doctors and politicians to reconsider the use of RNA vaccines and demands accountability from vaccine manufacturers. He also urges society to come together and reject the manipulation of power and money, and instead focus on rebuilding the country in times of crisis.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Professor Doktor Sugarid Bhakti. Frau Merkel hat die zwölf Minuten nie verdient. Hier werden Sie mal fällig gewesen. Danke, Professor Bhakdi. Danke. Danke, ihr Lieben. Ich habe Tausende von Vorträgen gehalten. Aber der Anfang von diesem Vortrag Fällt mich so schwer. Ich bin so ergriffen. Ich bin so ergriffen. Entschuldigung. Entschuldigung. Wissen Sie, wie hoch die Lebenserwartung eines deutschen Wirges zu Beginn der medizinischen Revolution Im neunzehnten Jahrhundert war ja achtunddreißig, ja. Wissen Sie, Wenn damals ein Mensch seinen sechzigjährigen Geburtstag gefeiert hat, wie viele Jahre härte ihn noch vor sich? Ja, sechs bis sieben. Kaum weniger als jetzt. Wie erklärt sich das? Damals waren Infektionen die Hauptursache von Krankheit und Tod. Und sie betrafen jüngere Menschen Unter sechzig. Sie wurden durch die Mikrobiologie besiegt, Infektionskrankheiten, sodass sich die gesamte Lebenserwartung insgesamt verdoppelte. Andere Fortschritte der Medizin in der Kardiologie, Krebsforschung, Gentechnologie Haben im Vergleich dazu der Menschheit nicht annähernd so viel gebracht. Wie hat die Mikrobiologie das geschafft, Die Mehrheit, vor allem Politiker und Medien werden rufen, natürlich durch die Impfung. Das jedoch ist der weltweite Irrglaube, der die gegenwärtige Krise verursacht hat. Tatsache ist, dass Impfungen eine viel, viel kleinere Rolle gespielt haben als andere Umstände. Vor allem die Besserung der Lebensbedingungen, Der gesunde Lebenswandel waren entscheidend für den Rückgang von todbringenden Infektionen. Sicher ist allerdings eins, Die Impfung erwies sich als größte Segen für die Geld- und Weltelite, für die Pharmaindustrie und Politik. Sie konnten ihre eigenen Interessen verfolgen unter dem gemeinsamen Slogan, alles für die öffentliche Gesundheit, Alles für das Wohlergehen der Allgemeinheit. Dieses hehre Ziel zu erreichen, haben Sie die WHO geschaffen. Dieser nicht demokratisch vom Volk gewählte, im Grunde also Privatverein ist dabei, Sich die Vollmacht übers Gesundheitswesen in den einhundertneunzig Mitgliedsstaaten zu ergattern. Deutschland ist einer der größten Unterstützer dieses Vorhabens. In nur sechs Monaten wird in diesen Räumlichkeiten dem Deutschen Bundestag Endgültig darüber abgestimmt, ob die WHO mit der Generalvollmacht ausgestattet wird, Jede Zeit eine medizinische Notlage zu verkünden, die das Aufheben von Menschenrechten begründet und zwingend notwendig macht, Dies beinhaltet auch die Verwendung der neuen genbasierten RNA Impfstoffe. Die WHO hat bereits verkündet, dass diese Impfstoffe für möglichst alle Impfungen bei Mensch und Tier eingeführt werden. Warum wohl? Geld und Macht, Macht und Geld. Immer die gleiche Antwort. Klar, manche Impfungen waren tatsächlich segensreich. Tettenus, Wunschtarkrampf. Kann man heute durch die Impfung tatsächlich besiegen. Andere Seuchen wie Polio Sind verschwunden, wenngleich aus anderen Gründen. Die Frage nach der echten Notwendigkeit von vielen Impfungen Taucht zusehends auf. Sinkende Impfwilligkeit begegnet man am effektivsten mit direktem oder indirekter Impfzwang. Zwang. Der aber muss auch offiziell autorisiert sein, also Ente WHO. Und dann muss dafür gesorgt werden, dass die Impfstoffe in ausreichender riesige Menge verfügbar gemacht werden können. Hier lautete tatsächlich ein Problem. Bei den bisherigen Impfungen werden inaktivierte Substanzen injiziert, die die Bildung von spezifischen Antikörpern anregen. Die Impfstoffe gegen Tetanus und Diphthrie beispielsweise müssen von Menschenhand produziert werden. Die Herstellung ist relativ aufwendig und werden. Die Herstellung ist relativ aufwendig und kostet. Bei den RNA Impfstoffen Werden statt Genprodukte die entsprechenden Gene verabreicht und die gespritzten Menschen produzieren dann die eigentlichen Produkte in ihrem Körper. Billiger geht es nicht. Genialst dabei, die WHO befiehlt die Indexionen, Die Bürger müssen mit ihren Steuergeldern für die Gene bezahlen, lassen sich spritzen und verwandeln sich Dann selbst in die Fabriken für die Impfstoffherstellung. Ja. Wie funktioniert das? Das Genom ist die Gesamtheit der DNA kodierten Anweisungen in eine Zelle. Links DNA. Diese Bücher des Lebens sind in Chromosomen verpackt und werden in Zellkern aufbewahrt. Die DNA Schrift besteht aus nur vier Buchstaben, die aneinander die aneinandergereiht sind. Das Geniale dabei, jede Reihenfolge ist der Code für ein ganz bestimmtes Eiweißprodukt. ABCD ergibt Produkt eins, BACD Produkt zwei, BADC Produkt drei und so weiter. Die Zahl der möglichen Produkte steigt mit jede Verlängerung der Wörter in ungeahnte Höhe steilst an. Mit zwei Buchstaben gibt es zwei mögliche Reihenfolgen, ABBA. Mit drei ABC gibt es bereits sechs Möglichkeiten. Können Sie zu Hause mal ausprobieren. Mit drei, sechs Möglichkeiten. Mit vier, Sechs mal vier Möglichkeiten, das sind vierundzwanzig. Mit fünf vierundzwanzig mal fünf, so geht es. Also nicht exponentiell, sondern super. Man muss jemand die letzte Zahl dazu multiplizieren. ABCDABCDA Fünf ABCDAB, sechs und so weiter. Sind nur vier Buchstaben, aber in eine beliebig langen Reihenfolge. Mit zehn bekommt man schon über drei Millionen Möglichkeiten. Erstaunlich. Das hat irgendjemand eingeführt. Irgendjemand. Wenn ein Rezept für ein Produkt benötigt wird, dann wird das Buch des Lebens auf der richtigen Seite aufgeschlagen Und eine Kopie, Abplattkopie hergestellt. Diese Kopie ist RNA, mRNA in der Mitte. Und diese wird dann in die Antiproduktionsstätte in der Zelle gebracht Und verwendet, abgelesen. Das nach dem Rezept entstandene Produkt Wird zur Überprüfung auf die Fensterbank der Zelle gestellt draußen? Die Rezeptur, Die RNA wird schnell und leise entsorgt. Die DNA bleibt lebenslänglich. RNA Impfstoffe sind solch kurzlebige Kopien Chromosomen ausgewählter Antigene Steuern zum Beispiel für das Virus Spike Protein. RNA Impfstoffe müssen in winzige Fettkügelchen, sogenannte Lipid Nanopartikeln verpackt werden. Das sind diese Kugeln und da drin ist mRNA. Müssen versandfertig verpackt werden. Die Verpackung schützt die RNA vor Zerstörung, damit sie über den Blutkreislauf zu allen Organen des Körpers gelangen kann. Dort wirken die Kügelchen wie trojanische Pferde. Zellen nehmen sie auf, ihre Fracht wird im Inneren und die Rezepte steuern die Produktion des Genproduktes, das auf der Fensterbank auch wieder zur Inspektion Ausgestellt wird, mehr als eine Milliarden, viele Milliarden RNA kopieren In Fettkügelchen werden mit jede Injektion in einen menschlichen Empfänger, in ein Kind, ein Baby Verabreicht. Die Massenproduktion von RNA im RNA Er fordert die massenhafte Verfügbarkeit der DNA Vorlagen. Wie kann das erreicht werden? Grundsätzlich gibt es dazu zwei Wege. Erstens, die vier DNA Buchstaben sind heute Jeweils in Großpackungen frei erhältlich, in Supermärkten. Ihre Verknüpfung ist per Computersteuerung In einem Reagenzgefäß, in jede beliebigen Reihenfolge in Labor machbar. Sind DNA Rezepte zum Beispiel für die Codierung von Virusspyprotein bekannt, können sie in Genlabors zu Papier gebracht werden und dann zur Erstellung der RNA ab Klatschkopien verwendet werden. Und so Entstand der erste Coronaimpfstoff von BioNTech, der mithilfe von Pfizer im Sommer zwanzig zwanzig in der klinischen Zulassungsstudie an zwanzigtausend Menschen getestet wurden. Zwanzigtausend haben's bekommen, Zwanzigtausend haben ein ein Placebo bekommen. Aufgrund des angeblichen Erfolges wurde die bedingte Zulassung für die Verwendung in Deutschland und Dann in der Welt erteilt. Der Erfolg der klinischen Zulassungsstudie ist für sich Eine Geschichte von Großbetrug und Täuschung, das haben Sie heute auch bereits erfahren. Dieses war der erste Streich, Doch der Zweite folgte sogleich der größte Betrug aller Zeiten. Merken Sie sich wohl, Einige Milliarden künstlich erzeugte DNA Rezepte zur Impfung von nur zwanzigtausend Menschen waren machbar Im Genlabor. Aber zur Impfung von Milliarden Menschen, nein. Das war nicht möglich. Das war einfach Viel und viel zu teuer. Dafür mussten die Hersteller zurück zur Natur. Der Trick, Die Milliarden- und Triaden- und unzähligen DNA Rezepten werden nicht mehr computergesteuert in Maschinen zusammengebastelt, Sie stammen aus Bakterien, also zwei Wege zur Produktion. Erste Weg künstlich, computergesteuert, zweite Massenproduktion durch Bakterien, Minikromosomen, Plasmide. Diese Minikromosomen, Dieses in diesem Fall ist diese DNA nicht mehr menschliche DNA, sondern das ist jetzt Bakterien DNA wohlgemerkt, Ja? Diese Minikomosomen sind leicht zu gewinnen und zu manipulieren. Fremde Rezept, zum Beispiel das Gen für das oder Jedes andere gehen, das Sie wollen, können dort eingefügt werden. Die Bakterien werden dann angezüchtet und durch der Anzug einfach automatisch massenhaft vermehrt. Die Plasmide werden anschließend herausgeholt und als Vorlage für die Herstellung der mRNA Kopien verwendet. Jetzt haben wir sie wieder, aber sie stammen aus Bakterien, dieser Abklatsch. Halt rufen Sie jetzt. Das ist doch Anders als das behördlich genehmigte Verfahren. Frage vom geneigten Publikum, Wurde die Verwendung der Bakterienkomosomen für die Impfstoffherstellern jemals auf Sicherheit geprüft und genehmigt? Die Antwort ist in kürzlich erschienenen Büchern von Doktor Jürgen Kirchner, Allias David Fischer Und Rechtsanwältin Doktor Brigitte Röhrich nachzulesen. Es war eine Leseempfehlung von mir. Die sind grade erschienen. Antwort, nein, Sie sind nie geprüft worden, weder auf Inhalt noch auf Sicherheit. Die Zulassungsbehörden, dazu gehört Pi, Immer FDA haben Sie einfach durchgewunken und genehmigt. Sie, Die Behörden waren Mitwisser und Mittäter. Mobile. Bis jetzt muss der leider Verdacht kommen, dass diese gesamte Impfaktion möglicherweise ein gigantisches Medizinverbrechen war und ist. Und jetzt erzähl ich, welche ungeheuerlichen Konsequenzen ein solches Verbrechen in sich birgt. Was jeder wissen muss, ist, dass jede Zelle Sicherheitskräfte Wache halten. Alles ist gut, wenn etwas nach einem Rezept aus Ihrem Buch des Lebens hergestellt wird. Aber wehe, Wenn das Rezept aus einem fremden Buch stammt, dann greifen die Sicherheitskräfte unser Immunsystem, Die produzierende Zelle sofort an. Die Fähigkeit des Immunsystems, Zellen zu erkennen und zu vernichten, die nicht selbst Herstellen, ist bei der Geburt gegeben und endet mit dem Tod. Auf der linken Seite eine Zelle, die Eigenes produziert. Alles gut. Das Produkt in schwarz wird nicht erkannt von unserem Immunsystem und die Zelle bleibt am Leben. Ganz anders, rechts eine Zelle, die gespritzte RNA aufgenommen hat und umsetzt. Diese gespritzte mRNA, die so verpackt ist, dass sie alle Zellen im Körper erreichen kann. Dann wird Diese Zelle markiert vom Immunsystem und zum Tode verurteilt. Es ist etwas, was jedes Kind in der Schule lernen sollte. Jedes Kind sollte das in der Schule lernen. Denken Sie an die Abstoßung von Transplantaten. Sie bekommen meine Niere, Sie stoßen meine Niere ab. Nicht selbst wird nicht einmal innerhalb der gleichen Spezies toleriert, Mensch. Und wenn nach dem ersten Misserfolg eine erneute Versuch unternommen wird, Sie bekommen eine zweite Niere, folgt eine gnadenlose Ablehnung, schnellst und heftigst. Das gleiche Prinzip liegt der immer stärker werdenden Intensität der unerwünschten Ereignisse zugrunde, die im Gefolge von Booster RNA Injektionen auftreten. Bedenken Sie, die Anzahl der verpackten RNA Kopien, die mit jede Injektion verabreicht werden, ist gigantisch. Im ganzen Körper werden schier unzählige Immunangriffe ausgelöst, die erst zum Stillstand kommen, wenn die Produktion des fremden Proteins beendet ist. Wie lange wird dies dauern? Nur ein paar Tage, wie die Impfhersteller, die Impfanbeter, die Politiker, der Nobelpreisausschuss Nicht müde werden zu behaupten? Im vergangenen Jahr tauchte ein alarmierender Befund auf, der mit dieser Behauptung unvereinbar ist. Bei Geimpften wurden Wochen und sogar Monate nach den Injektionen Schweigproteine und Multiorganentzündungen im Sinne von Autoimmunreaktionen festgestellt. Dies war mit schweren und oft tödlichen Erkrankungen verbunden. Welchen Grund konnte und kann es für eine solch katastrophale, lang anhaltende Produktion eines RNA codierten Proteins geben. Die im März dieses Jahr bekannte bekannt gemachte Entdeckung von Kevin McCönen und Kollegen Liefert eine erschreckende Erklärung. Bei der Impfstoffherstellung müssen die Bakterien Mini Chromosomen von der Verpackung der erzeugten mRNA entfernt werden, sonst werden sie ja mitverpackt. Wir haben Bakterienkonsum links, Abklatschpräparate RNA In der Mitte, bevor diese RNA verpackt wird, muss die DNA entfernt werden. Das ist möglich, aber nicht Trivial. Sonst werden Sie mitverpackt. Und dann haben wir so was. Immerennah verpackt neben DNA verpackt. Ich glaube, dass das gar nicht so schwer ist zu verstehen. Und ich kann mir vorstellen, dass auch die Politiker anderer Parteien das verstehen. Okay. Das brauchen wir jetzt nicht zu diskutieren. Kevin McCönan entdeckte, dass dieser entscheidende Schritt der Entfernung von Plasmit DNA nicht gewissenhaft durchgeführt worden war. Es wurden riesige Mengen an Plasmit DNA in verpackte Form, sehr wohlgemerkt, in verpackte Form gefunden. Ihre erfolgreiche Lieferung an die Zellen war dadurch gesichert. Kevins Entdeckung ist inzwischen in mehreren anderen Labors bestätigt worden, auch in Deutschland. In allen siebenundzwanzig bislang untersuchten Chargen wurden große Mengen an DNA Verunreinigungen gefunden. Vor vier Wochen hat sogar die kanadische Medizinbehörde Plasmit den Afund bestätigt. Allerdings sieht Die Behörde darin keinen ausreichenden Grund dafür, die Zulassung zurückzunehmen, im Übrigen. Frage an das geneigte Publikum. Hat die zuständige deutsche Behörde das Paul Ehrlich Institut vom Bundesministerium für Gesundheit Verlässliche, verlässliche wissenschaftliche Messungen vorgenommen? Frage, Antwort, nein. Bis zum heutigen Tag Nicht. Meine Damen und Herren, das muss rechtliche Konsequenzen haben. Das ist nämlich schlichtweg sträflich. Das Paul Ehrlich Institut ist, Wie alle Behörden des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit dazu verpflichtet, die Bevölkerung vor Gesundheitsgefahren zu schützen. Die Aufnahme von bakteriellen Chromosomen verändert die Gesamtheit von DNA Instruktionen in der Zelle und ist gleichbedeutend mit einer Veränderung des Genoms. Wohlgemerkt, bei jede Zellteilung löst sich die schützende Hülle des Zellkerns Auf, sodass fremde DNA, was in die Zelle kommen? Fremde DNA Unmittelbar neben unseren Chromosomen zu liegen kommen können kann und dann in den neu gebildeten Kernen der Tochterzellen eingeschlossen wird. Eine fortdauernde Produktion von Fremdproteinen kann stattfinden, die zu langfristigen Entzündungen und Organschäden im ganzen Körper führen wird. Eine solche lange anhaltende Produktion ist in Zellkulturversuchen und in Tierversuchen bereits gezeigt worden, denn diese Lipiten einer Partikel sind, werden seit über zehn Jahren verwendet, Prämie DNA in Tierversuchen, in die Tiersinn zu bringen. Natürlich sagt's Das Paul the Aires Institut, das hat man aber für Menschen nicht nachgewiesen. Eine fortdauernde Produktion kann einfach tödlich sein, Ist doch klar. Gefäßwände werden beschädigt. Blutungen Und die Bildung von Blutgrinseln sind die unvermatischen Folgen. Das haben wir vor drei jahren schon gesagt ich war drei jahre mein gott Das Gewebe wird aufgrund von Sauerstoffmangel absterben. Das Herz ist ein Organ, das abgestorbene Zellen nicht ersetzen kann. Wer hat nicht schon von den mysteriösen plötzlichen Herz Todesfällen gehört, die sich weltweit ereignen. Sie sind nur die Spitze eines Eisberges. Durch Impfungen ausgelöste Herzkrankheiten stehen auf der Tagesordnung von Jung und Alt. Zur Ehrenrettung der deutschen Wissenschaft sind zum Glück Namhafte Pathologen aufgestanden und haben die weltweit ersten Forschungsarbeiten geleistet, die den Zusammenhang zwischen Impfung und schwersten Organschäden aufdeckten. Professor Arne Burkhardt Vor Kurzem tragischerweise verunglückt. Und sein lieber Freund Professor Walter Lang, der heute zu Ihnen gesprochen hat, Doktor Michael Mertz in Dresden und der weltbekannte Professor Peter Schirrmacher, Direktor des Instituts für Pathologie der Universität Heidelberg. Durch deren Arbeiten ist es heute wissenschaftlich gesichert. Und so steht es in dieser Arbeit aus der Groove von Peter Schiermacher wortwörtlich, es Ist zweifelsfrei erwiesen, dass die Impfung zu tödlichen Myocadidin führen kann. Steht drin, es ist ein international viel zitierte, absolut akzeptierte Arbeit. Es kann niemand kommen sagen, dass das nicht erwiesen ist. Diese Herren, denn es gab noch eine Dame, Ute Krüger, Auch schon erwähnt heute, Sie haben's schon längst erwiesen und bewiesen. Das zweite Organ, das seine Toten nicht ersetzen kann, ist das Gehirn. Je nachdem, wo der Impfschaden auftritt, kann es zu verschiedenartigsten neurologischen und psychiatrischen Erkrankungen kommen. Nervenausfälle und Lähmungen, aber auch Demenz-, Psychosen- und Wesensveränderungen Sind bei Geimpften auf der Tagesordnung. Die unfassbare Horrorgeschichte ist damit noch nicht zu Ende. Zerackte DNA Bruchstücke sind massenhaft als Impfstoffverunreinigungen gefunden worden. Buchstückartige DNA Sequenzen haben eine erhöhte Neigung, in die chromomale DNA eingebaut zu werden. Die möglichen Folgen sind endlos. Es kann zur Störung des fein abgestimmten Netzwerkes kommen, Dass die Zellteilung und die Zelldifferenzierung steuert. Krebs- und Entwicklungsstörungen können Folgen sein. Mutationen in Spermien und befruchteten Eizellen könnten veränderte Eigenschaften vererbbar machen. Meine Damen und Herren, glauben Sie nichts anders. Die Wahrheit ist, Kostengünstiger Verfahren zur zuverlässigen Trennung der massenproduzierten RNA von den Bakterienchromosomen gibt es nicht. Die komplette Entfernung wär würde viel zu teuer sein. Darum sind die Bakterien Chromosomen in allen bislang untersuchten Impfschaden auch gefunden worden. Merken Sie wohl, Verunreinigungen mit Plasmit DNA Werden bei allen RNA Impfstoffen die Regeln und nicht die Ausnahme sein? Und merken Sie sich, Der Unterschied zwischen diese DNA und DNA, die sonst irgendwo Paul Ehrlich Institut oder ehemals zitiert als Akzeptable Coronaeinigung unterscheidet sich darin, dass diese DNA verpackt ist, versandfertig für die Zelle. Das passiert bei nackte DNA nie. Da können Sie tatsächlich Bakterien DNA in den Damen spritzen, es passiert nichts, weil diese DNA wird sofort abgebaut, zerstört. Meine Damen und Herren, wer RNA Impfstoffe als sicher und wirksam, lob preist. Wer behauptet, die Impfung würde nur seltenst ernsthafte Nebenwirkungen erzeugen, ist entweder unglaublich ignorant oder unendlich böse Und er macht sich Strafbar. So wie alle, die diese Impfung aktiv oder passiv betreiben und befürworten. Denn es ist heute wissenschaftlich erwiesen, dass die Impfung nur Negatives bewirken kann Und dies in lebensbedrohlichem Ausmaß. Zum Schluss etwas Positives. Die positive Botschaft für die Welt. Der alles entscheidende DNA Fund ist erst vor Monaten gemacht worden. Vorher konnte niemand erahnen, Dass Impfchargen mit Bakterien Chromosomen verunreinigt waren. Genauso wichtig, die Allgemeinheit konnte nicht ahnen, Dass sie eine Substanz injiziert bekamen, die überhaupt nicht geprüft worden war, nicht auf Wirksamkeit, nicht auf Sicherheit, nicht auf Inhalt, Schlichtweg. Deswegen, Werte, Ärzte, Kolleginnen und Kollegen, Sie können sich noch retten. Sie wurden getäuscht. Sie wurden missbraucht. Sie konnten nicht ahnen, Was und wie alles geschah. Aber jetzt wissen wir's. Und noch, noch Gibt es kurze Zeit zurückzukehren auf den Weg des Hippokrates? Nehmen Sie nie wieder eine Genspritze in die Hand, Und machen Sie Schluss mit der menschenverachtenden WHO. Im gleichen Kontext, Politiker Deutschlands, über alle Parteigrenzen hinweg, Auch Sie können sich mit der Absage an das Großverbrechen retten. Sie konnten erst recht das alles nicht gewusst haben. Auch Sie wurden getäuscht und missbraucht. Auch Sie können sich und Ihre Ehre noch retten. Ziehen Sie Ihren Kopf aus der Schlinge so schnell wie möglich. Bald wird es zu spät sein, denn die Welt versteht nun so langsam die Machenschaften. Und Sie werden nicht sagen können, dass der Weckruf Sie nicht erreicht hat. Agieren Sie gemeinsam jetzt Für Ihr Volk beschließen Sie, dass keine weiteren RNA Injektionen verabreicht werden dürfen, bis die lebenswichtigen, offenen Fragen geklärt sind. Und liebe Politiker, realisieren Sie doch, dass jeder Kaufvertrag, der auf Betrug und Täuschung ruht, für null und nichtig erklärt werden kann und muss. Verlangen Sie das Geld Ihres Volkes von den Herstellern dieser Betrugswahlen zurück. Und lassen Sie die Milliarden Ihrem Volk zukommen, vor allem den ärmsten Impfopfern und ihren Hinterbliebenen. Lieber Mitmenschen. Die Spaltung unserer Gesellschaft hat tiefer Kleben gezogen. Lasst uns jetzt zurück zueinander finden. Sagen Sie all denjenigen nein, die zu Marionetten von Macht und Geld geworden sind. Sagen Sie ja zu unserer Solidargemeinschaft, Die alleine dieses Land wie in Krisenzeiten zuvor wiederaufbauen kann und muss.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

gwahhh i misspelt his name sorry! Translated and subtitled at the Speed of Science™!

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Full transcript here - feel free to use for local translations. https://www.aussie17.com/p/prof-dr-sucharit-bhakdis-emotional

Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi's emotional address to the AfD faction at the German Parliament - Nov 12, 2023 Watch now (37 mins) | Transcript aussie17.com
_aussie17
Posted - November 26, 2023 at 12:36 PM
Saved - November 26, 2023 at 8:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In an emotional address to the AfD faction at the German Parliament, Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi highlighted the questionable motives behind the vaccination campaign. He criticized the non-democratically elected WHO's influence over healthcare systems worldwide. Furthermore, he discussed the discovery of plasmid DNA contamination in vaccine batches, which authorities have failed to address. Prof. Burkhardt and Prof. Lang's research established a link between vaccination and severe organ damage, particularly fatal myocarditis. Bhakdi emphasized that those who claim vaccines are safe and ignore their negative effects are either ignorant or complicit in a potential crime.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

💥💥💥💥💥 Must watch if you have 30 mins! Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi's emotional address to the AfD faction at the German Parliament receives a rousing standing ovation and thunderous applause (Nov 12, 2023!) Highlights------------------------------------------ "...The vaccination turned out to be the greatest blessing for the money and world's elites, for the pharmaceutical industry and politics. They could pursue their own interests, under the common slogan "Everything for public health", "everything for the well-being of the general public". To achieve this goal, they created the WHO. This non-democratically elected people, basically a private association that is in the process of gaining power over the healthcare system in the 190 Member States" "Kevin McKernan (@Kevin_McKernan) discovered that this crucial step of removal of plasmid DNA had not been carried out conscientiously. Huge amounts of plasmid DNA have been found in packaged form. This ensured their successful delivery to the cells. Kevin's discovery has now been confirmed in several other laboratories, Also in Germany. Large amounts of DNA contamination were found in all 27 batches examined so far. Four weeks ago, the Canadian medical authority even confirmed the discovery of plasmid DNA. However, the authority does not see this as a sufficient reason for to withdraw the approval. By the way, question for the interested public, has the responsible German authority, the Paul Ehrlich Institute of the Federal Ministry of Health carried out reliable scientific measurements? Question, answer, no. Not to this day." "Who hasn't heard about the mysterious sudden cardiac deaths occurring around the world? They are just the tip of an iceberg. Heart disease caused by vaccinations is on the agenda of young and old alike. Fortunately, to save the honor of German science, well-known pathologists stood up and carried out the world's first research work, who discovered the connection between vaccination and severe organ damage. Professor Arne Burkhardt, who recently tragically died in an accident, and his dear friend Professor Walter Lang, who spoke to you today. Dr. Michael Mörz in Dresden and the world-famous Professor Peter Schiermacher, director of the Institute of Pathology at Heidelberg University. Thanks to their work, it is now scientifically proven. And so it says in this work from Peter Schiermacher's group, Literally, it has been proven beyond a doubt that vaccination can lead to fatal myocarditis." "Anyone who praises RNA vaccines as safe and effective, Anyone who claims that vaccination rarely causes serious side effects is either incredibly ignorant or infinitely evil. And they ar committing a crime. Just like everyone who actively or passively pursues and supports this vaccination. Because it is now scientifically proven that vaccination can only have negative effects and this to a life-threatening extent." -------------------------------------------- Please note that this will likely be "community noted" because (as of 26 Nov 2023), the existing "official" guidelines appear to still be significantly influenced by major pharmaceutical entities, and regulatory bodies continue to be potentially compromised.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Professor Doktor Sugarid Bhakti discusses the role of vaccinations in improving life expectancy. He argues that while vaccinations have played a smaller role than commonly believed, they have been beneficial for the pharmaceutical industry and politicians. He explains the process of RNA vaccines and highlights the potential dangers associated with them, including organ damage and autoimmune reactions. He calls for a halt to RNA injections until further research is conducted and urges politicians to demand refunds from vaccine manufacturers. He also emphasizes the importance of unity and solidarity in rebuilding society.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Professor Doktor Sugarid Bhakti. Frau Merkel hat die zwölf Minuten nie verdient. Hier werden Sie mal fällig gewesen. Danke, Professor Bhakdi. Danke. Danke, ihr Lieben. Ich habe Tausende von Vorträgen gehalten. Aber der Anfang von diesem Vortrag Fällt mich so schwer. Ich bin so ergriffen. Ich bin so ergriffen. Entschuldigung. Entschuldigung. Wissen Sie, wie hoch die Lebenserwartung eines deutschen Wirges zu Beginn der medizinischen Revolution Im neunzehnten Jahrhundert war ja achtunddreißig, ja. Wissen Sie, Wenn damals ein Mensch seinen sechzigjährigen Geburtstag gefeiert hat, wie viele Jahre härte ihn noch vor sich? Ja, sechs bis sieben. Kaum weniger als jetzt. Wie erklärt sich das? Damals waren Infektionen die Hauptursache von Krankheit und Tod. Und sie betrafen jüngere Menschen Unter sechzig. Sie wurden durch die Mikrobiologie besiegt, Infektionskrankheiten, sodass sich die gesamte Lebenserwartung insgesamt verdoppelte. Andere Fortschritte der Medizin in der Kardiologie, Krebsforschung, Gentechnologie Haben im Vergleich dazu der Menschheit nicht annähernd so viel gebracht. Wie hat die Mikrobiologie das geschafft, Die Mehrheit, vor allem Politiker und Medien werden rufen, natürlich durch die Impfung. Das jedoch ist der weltweite Irrglaube, der die gegenwärtige Krise verursacht hat. Tatsache ist, dass Impfungen eine viel, viel kleinere Rolle gespielt haben als andere Umstände. Vor allem die Besserung der Lebensbedingungen, Der gesunde Lebenswandel waren entscheidend für den Rückgang von todbringenden Infektionen. Sicher ist allerdings eins, Die Impfung erwies sich als größte Segen für die Geld- und Weltelite, für die Pharmaindustrie und Politik. Sie konnten ihre eigenen Interessen verfolgen unter dem gemeinsamen Slogan, alles für die öffentliche Gesundheit, Alles für das Wohlergehen der Allgemeinheit. Dieses hehre Ziel zu erreichen, haben Sie die WHO geschaffen. Dieser nicht demokratisch vom Volk gewählte, im Grunde also Privatverein ist dabei, Sich die Vollmacht übers Gesundheitswesen in den einhundertneunzig Mitgliedsstaaten zu ergattern. Deutschland ist einer der größten Unterstützer dieses Vorhabens. In nur sechs Monaten wird in diesen Räumlichkeiten dem Deutschen Bundestag Endgültig darüber abgestimmt, ob die WHO mit der Generalvollmacht ausgestattet wird, Jede Zeit eine medizinische Notlage zu verkünden, die das Aufheben von Menschenrechten begründet und zwingend notwendig macht, Dies beinhaltet auch die Verwendung der neuen genbasierten RNA Impfstoffe. Die WHO hat bereits verkündet, dass diese Impfstoffe für möglichst alle Impfungen bei Mensch und Tier eingeführt werden. Warum wohl? Geld und Macht, Macht und Geld. Immer die gleiche Antwort. Klar, manche Impfungen waren tatsächlich segensreich. Tettenus, Wunschtarkrampf. Kann man heute durch die Impfung tatsächlich besiegen. Andere Seuchen wie Polio Sind verschwunden, wenngleich aus anderen Gründen. Die Frage nach der echten Notwendigkeit von vielen Impfungen Taucht zusehends auf. Sinkende Impfwilligkeit begegnet man am effektivsten mit direktem oder indirekter Impfzwang. Zwang. Der aber muss auch offiziell autorisiert sein, also Ente WHO. Und dann muss dafür gesorgt werden, dass die Impfstoffe in ausreichender riesige Menge verfügbar gemacht werden können. Hier lautete tatsächlich ein Problem. Bei den bisherigen Impfungen werden inaktivierte Substanzen injiziert, die die Bildung von spezifischen Antikörpern anregen. Die Impfstoffe gegen Tetanus und Diphthrie beispielsweise müssen von Menschenhand produziert werden. Die Herstellung ist relativ aufwendig und werden. Die Herstellung ist relativ aufwendig und kostet. Bei den RNA Impfstoffen Werden statt Genprodukte die entsprechenden Gene verabreicht und die gespritzten Menschen produzieren dann die eigentlichen Produkte in ihrem Körper. Billiger geht es nicht. Genialst dabei, die WHO befiehlt die Indexionen, Die Bürger müssen mit ihren Steuergeldern für die Gene bezahlen, lassen sich spritzen und verwandeln sich Dann selbst in die Fabriken für die Impfstoffherstellung. Ja. Wie funktioniert das? Das Genom ist die Gesamtheit der DNA kodierten Anweisungen in eine Zelle. Links DNA. Diese Bücher des Lebens sind in Chromosomen verpackt und werden in Zellkern aufbewahrt. Die DNA Schrift besteht aus nur vier Buchstaben, die aneinander die aneinandergereiht sind. Das Geniale dabei, jede Reihenfolge ist der Code für ein ganz bestimmtes Eiweißprodukt. ABCD ergibt Produkt eins, BACD Produkt zwei, BADC Produkt drei und so weiter. Die Zahl der möglichen Produkte steigt mit jede Verlängerung der Wörter in ungeahnte Höhe steilst an. Mit zwei Buchstaben gibt es zwei mögliche Reihenfolgen, ABBA. Mit drei ABC gibt es bereits sechs Möglichkeiten. Können Sie zu Hause mal ausprobieren. Mit drei, sechs Möglichkeiten. Mit vier, Sechs mal vier Möglichkeiten, das sind vierundzwanzig. Mit fünf vierundzwanzig mal fünf, so geht es. Also nicht exponentiell, sondern super. Man muss jemand die letzte Zahl dazu multiplizieren. ABCDABCDA Fünf ABCDAB, sechs und so weiter. Sind nur vier Buchstaben, aber in eine beliebig langen Reihenfolge. Mit zehn bekommt man schon über drei Millionen Möglichkeiten. Erstaunlich. Das hat irgendjemand eingeführt. Irgendjemand. Wenn ein Rezept für ein Produkt benötigt wird, dann wird das Buch des Lebens auf der richtigen Seite aufgeschlagen Und eine Kopie, Abplattkopie hergestellt. Diese Kopie ist RNA, mRNA in der Mitte. Und diese wird dann in die Antiproduktionsstätte in der Zelle gebracht Und verwendet, abgelesen. Das nach dem Rezept entstandene Produkt Wird zur Überprüfung auf die Fensterbank der Zelle gestellt draußen? Die Rezeptur, Die RNA wird schnell und leise entsorgt. Die DNA bleibt lebenslänglich. RNA Impfstoffe sind solch kurzlebige Kopien Chromosomen ausgewählter Antigene Steuern zum Beispiel für das Virus Spike Protein. RNA Impfstoffe müssen in winzige Fettkügelchen, sogenannte Lipid Nanopartikeln verpackt werden. Das sind diese Kugeln und da drin ist mRNA. Müssen versandfertig verpackt werden. Die Verpackung schützt die RNA vor Zerstörung, damit sie über den Blutkreislauf zu allen Organen des Körpers gelangen kann. Dort wirken die Kügelchen wie trojanische Pferde. Zellen nehmen sie auf, ihre Fracht wird im Inneren und die Rezepte steuern die Produktion des Genproduktes, das auf der Fensterbank auch wieder zur Inspektion Ausgestellt wird, mehr als eine Milliarden, viele Milliarden RNA kopieren In Fettkügelchen werden mit jede Injektion in einen menschlichen Empfänger, in ein Kind, ein Baby Verabreicht. Die Massenproduktion von RNA im RNA Er fordert die massenhafte Verfügbarkeit der DNA Vorlagen. Wie kann das erreicht werden? Grundsätzlich gibt es dazu zwei Wege. Erstens, die vier DNA Buchstaben sind heute Jeweils in Großpackungen frei erhältlich, in Supermärkten. Ihre Verknüpfung ist per Computersteuerung In einem Reagenzgefäß, in jede beliebigen Reihenfolge in Labor machbar. Sind DNA Rezepte zum Beispiel für die Codierung von Virusspyprotein bekannt, können sie in Genlabors zu Papier gebracht werden und dann zur Erstellung der RNA ab Klatschkopien verwendet werden. Und so Entstand der erste Coronaimpfstoff von BioNTech, der mithilfe von Pfizer im Sommer zwanzig zwanzig in der klinischen Zulassungsstudie an zwanzigtausend Menschen getestet wurden. Zwanzigtausend haben's bekommen, Zwanzigtausend haben ein ein Placebo bekommen. Aufgrund des angeblichen Erfolges wurde die bedingte Zulassung für die Verwendung in Deutschland und Dann in der Welt erteilt. Der Erfolg der klinischen Zulassungsstudie ist für sich Eine Geschichte von Großbetrug und Täuschung, das haben Sie heute auch bereits erfahren. Dieses war der erste Streich, Doch der Zweite folgte sogleich der größte Betrug aller Zeiten. Merken Sie sich wohl, Einige Milliarden künstlich erzeugte DNA Rezepte zur Impfung von nur zwanzigtausend Menschen waren machbar Im Genlabor. Aber zur Impfung von Milliarden Menschen, nein. Das war nicht möglich. Das war einfach Viel und viel zu teuer. Dafür mussten die Hersteller zurück zur Natur. Der Trick, Die Milliarden- und Triaden- und unzähligen DNA Rezepten werden nicht mehr computergesteuert in Maschinen zusammengebastelt, Sie stammen aus Bakterien, also zwei Wege zur Produktion. Erste Weg künstlich, computergesteuert, zweite Massenproduktion durch Bakterien, Minikromosomen, Plasmide. Diese Minikromosomen, Dieses in diesem Fall ist diese DNA nicht mehr menschliche DNA, sondern das ist jetzt Bakterien DNA wohlgemerkt, Ja? Diese Minikomosomen sind leicht zu gewinnen und zu manipulieren. Fremde Rezept, zum Beispiel das Gen für das oder Jedes andere gehen, das Sie wollen, können dort eingefügt werden. Die Bakterien werden dann angezüchtet und durch der Anzug einfach automatisch massenhaft vermehrt. Die Plasmide werden anschließend herausgeholt und als Vorlage für die Herstellung der mRNA Kopien verwendet. Jetzt haben wir sie wieder, aber sie stammen aus Bakterien, dieser Abklatsch. Halt rufen Sie jetzt. Das ist doch Anders als das behördlich genehmigte Verfahren. Frage vom geneigten Publikum, Wurde die Verwendung der Bakterienkomosomen für die Impfstoffherstellern jemals auf Sicherheit geprüft und genehmigt? Die Antwort ist in kürzlich erschienenen Büchern von Doktor Jürgen Kirchner, Allias David Fischer Und Rechtsanwältin Doktor Brigitte Röhrich nachzulesen. Es war eine Leseempfehlung von mir. Die sind grade erschienen. Antwort, nein, Sie sind nie geprüft worden, weder auf Inhalt noch auf Sicherheit. Die Zulassungsbehörden, dazu gehört Pi, Immer FDA haben Sie einfach durchgewunken und genehmigt. Sie, Die Behörden waren Mitwisser und Mittäter. Mobile. Bis jetzt muss der leider Verdacht kommen, dass diese gesamte Impfaktion möglicherweise ein gigantisches Medizinverbrechen war und ist. Und jetzt erzähl ich, welche ungeheuerlichen Konsequenzen ein solches Verbrechen in sich birgt. Was jeder wissen muss, ist, dass jede Zelle Sicherheitskräfte Wache halten. Alles ist gut, wenn etwas nach einem Rezept aus Ihrem Buch des Lebens hergestellt wird. Aber wehe, Wenn das Rezept aus einem fremden Buch stammt, dann greifen die Sicherheitskräfte unser Immunsystem, Die produzierende Zelle sofort an. Die Fähigkeit des Immunsystems, Zellen zu erkennen und zu vernichten, die nicht selbst Herstellen, ist bei der Geburt gegeben und endet mit dem Tod. Auf der linken Seite eine Zelle, die Eigenes produziert. Alles gut. Das Produkt in schwarz wird nicht erkannt von unserem Immunsystem und die Zelle bleibt am Leben. Ganz anders, rechts eine Zelle, die gespritzte RNA aufgenommen hat und umsetzt. Diese gespritzte mRNA, die so verpackt ist, dass sie alle Zellen im Körper erreichen kann. Dann wird Diese Zelle markiert vom Immunsystem und zum Tode verurteilt. Es ist etwas, was jedes Kind in der Schule lernen sollte. Jedes Kind sollte das in der Schule lernen. Denken Sie an die Abstoßung von Transplantaten. Sie bekommen meine Niere, Sie stoßen meine Niere ab. Nicht selbst wird nicht einmal innerhalb der gleichen Spezies toleriert, Mensch. Und wenn nach dem ersten Misserfolg eine erneute Versuch unternommen wird, Sie bekommen eine zweite Niere, folgt eine gnadenlose Ablehnung, schnellst und heftigst. Das gleiche Prinzip liegt der immer stärker werdenden Intensität der unerwünschten Ereignisse zugrunde, die im Gefolge von Booster RNA Injektionen auftreten. Bedenken Sie, die Anzahl der verpackten RNA Kopien, die mit jede Injektion verabreicht werden, ist gigantisch. Im ganzen Körper werden schier unzählige Immunangriffe ausgelöst, die erst zum Stillstand kommen, wenn die Produktion des fremden Proteins beendet ist. Wie lange wird dies dauern? Nur ein paar Tage, wie die Impfhersteller, die Impfanbeter, die Politiker, der Nobelpreisausschuss Nicht müde werden zu behaupten? Im vergangenen Jahr tauchte ein alarmierender Befund auf, der mit dieser Behauptung unvereinbar ist. Bei Geimpften wurden Wochen und sogar Monate nach den Injektionen Schweigproteine und Multiorganentzündungen im Sinne von Autoimmunreaktionen festgestellt. Dies war mit schweren und oft tödlichen Erkrankungen verbunden. Welchen Grund konnte und kann es für eine solch katastrophale, lang anhaltende Produktion eines RNA codierten Proteins geben. Die im März dieses Jahr bekannte bekannt gemachte Entdeckung von Kevin McCönen und Kollegen Liefert eine erschreckende Erklärung. Bei der Impfstoffherstellung müssen die Bakterien Mini Chromosomen von der Verpackung der erzeugten mRNA entfernt werden, sonst werden sie ja mitverpackt. Wir haben Bakterienkonsum links, Abklatschpräparate RNA In der Mitte, bevor diese RNA verpackt wird, muss die DNA entfernt werden. Das ist möglich, aber nicht Trivial. Sonst werden Sie mitverpackt. Und dann haben wir so was. Immerennah verpackt neben DNA verpackt. Ich glaube, dass das gar nicht so schwer ist zu verstehen. Und ich kann mir vorstellen, dass auch die Politiker anderer Parteien das verstehen. Okay. Das brauchen wir jetzt nicht zu diskutieren. Kevin McCönan entdeckte, dass dieser entscheidende Schritt der Entfernung von Plasmit DNA nicht gewissenhaft durchgeführt worden war. Es wurden riesige Mengen an Plasmit DNA in verpackte Form, sehr wohlgemerkt, in verpackte Form gefunden. Ihre erfolgreiche Lieferung an die Zellen war dadurch gesichert. Kevins Entdeckung ist inzwischen in mehreren anderen Labors bestätigt worden, auch in Deutschland. In allen siebenundzwanzig bislang untersuchten Chargen wurden große Mengen an DNA Verunreinigungen gefunden. Vor vier Wochen hat sogar die kanadische Medizinbehörde Plasmit den Afund bestätigt. Allerdings sieht Die Behörde darin keinen ausreichenden Grund dafür, die Zulassung zurückzunehmen, im Übrigen. Frage an das geneigte Publikum. Hat die zuständige deutsche Behörde das Paul Ehrlich Institut vom Bundesministerium für Gesundheit Verlässliche, verlässliche wissenschaftliche Messungen vorgenommen? Frage, Antwort, nein. Bis zum heutigen Tag Nicht. Meine Damen und Herren, das muss rechtliche Konsequenzen haben. Das ist nämlich schlichtweg sträflich. Das Paul Ehrlich Institut ist, Wie alle Behörden des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit dazu verpflichtet, die Bevölkerung vor Gesundheitsgefahren zu schützen. Die Aufnahme von bakteriellen Chromosomen verändert die Gesamtheit von DNA Instruktionen in der Zelle und ist gleichbedeutend mit einer Veränderung des Genoms. Wohlgemerkt, bei jede Zellteilung löst sich die schützende Hülle des Zellkerns Auf, sodass fremde DNA, was in die Zelle kommen? Fremde DNA Unmittelbar neben unseren Chromosomen zu liegen kommen können kann und dann in den neu gebildeten Kernen der Tochterzellen eingeschlossen wird. Eine fortdauernde Produktion von Fremdproteinen kann stattfinden, die zu langfristigen Entzündungen und Organschäden im ganzen Körper führen wird. Eine solche lange anhaltende Produktion ist in Zellkulturversuchen und in Tierversuchen bereits gezeigt worden, denn diese Lipiten einer Partikel sind, werden seit über zehn Jahren verwendet, Prämie DNA in Tierversuchen, in die Tiersinn zu bringen. Natürlich sagt's Das Paul the Aires Institut, das hat man aber für Menschen nicht nachgewiesen. Eine fortdauernde Produktion kann einfach tödlich sein, Ist doch klar. Gefäßwände werden beschädigt. Blutungen Und die Bildung von Blutgrinseln sind die unvermatischen Folgen. Das haben wir vor drei jahren schon gesagt ich war drei jahre mein gott Das Gewebe wird aufgrund von Sauerstoffmangel absterben. Das Herz ist ein Organ, das abgestorbene Zellen nicht ersetzen kann. Wer hat nicht schon von den mysteriösen plötzlichen Herz Todesfällen gehört, die sich weltweit ereignen. Sie sind nur die Spitze eines Eisberges. Durch Impfungen ausgelöste Herzkrankheiten stehen auf der Tagesordnung von Jung und Alt. Zur Ehrenrettung der deutschen Wissenschaft sind zum Glück Namhafte Pathologen aufgestanden und haben die weltweit ersten Forschungsarbeiten geleistet, die den Zusammenhang zwischen Impfung und schwersten Organschäden aufdeckten. Professor Arne Burkhardt Vor Kurzem tragischerweise verunglückt. Und sein lieber Freund Professor Walter Lang, der heute zu Ihnen gesprochen hat, Doktor Michael Mertz in Dresden und der weltbekannte Professor Peter Schirrmacher, Direktor des Instituts für Pathologie der Universität Heidelberg. Durch deren Arbeiten ist es heute wissenschaftlich gesichert. Und so steht es in dieser Arbeit aus der Groove von Peter Schiermacher wortwörtlich, es Ist zweifelsfrei erwiesen, dass die Impfung zu tödlichen Myocadidin führen kann. Steht drin, es ist ein international viel zitierte, absolut akzeptierte Arbeit. Es kann niemand kommen sagen, dass das nicht erwiesen ist. Diese Herren, denn es gab noch eine Dame, Ute Krüger, Auch schon erwähnt heute, Sie haben's schon längst erwiesen und bewiesen. Das zweite Organ, das seine Toten nicht ersetzen kann, ist das Gehirn. Je nachdem, wo der Impfschaden auftritt, kann es zu verschiedenartigsten neurologischen und psychiatrischen Erkrankungen kommen. Nervenausfälle und Lähmungen, aber auch Demenz-, Psychosen- und Wesensveränderungen Sind bei Geimpften auf der Tagesordnung. Die unfassbare Horrorgeschichte ist damit noch nicht zu Ende. Zerackte DNA Bruchstücke sind massenhaft als Impfstoffverunreinigungen gefunden worden. Buchstückartige DNA Sequenzen haben eine erhöhte Neigung, in die chromomale DNA eingebaut zu werden. Die möglichen Folgen sind endlos. Es kann zur Störung des fein abgestimmten Netzwerkes kommen, Dass die Zellteilung und die Zelldifferenzierung steuert. Krebs- und Entwicklungsstörungen können Folgen sein. Mutationen in Spermien und befruchteten Eizellen könnten veränderte Eigenschaften vererbbar machen. Meine Damen und Herren, glauben Sie nichts anders. Die Wahrheit ist, Kostengünstiger Verfahren zur zuverlässigen Trennung der massenproduzierten RNA von den Bakterienchromosomen gibt es nicht. Die komplette Entfernung wär würde viel zu teuer sein. Darum sind die Bakterien Chromosomen in allen bislang untersuchten Impfschaden auch gefunden worden. Merken Sie wohl, Verunreinigungen mit Plasmit DNA Werden bei allen RNA Impfstoffen die Regeln und nicht die Ausnahme sein? Und merken Sie sich, Der Unterschied zwischen diese DNA und DNA, die sonst irgendwo Paul Ehrlich Institut oder ehemals zitiert als Akzeptable Coronaeinigung unterscheidet sich darin, dass diese DNA verpackt ist, versandfertig für die Zelle. Das passiert bei nackte DNA nie. Da können Sie tatsächlich Bakterien DNA in den Damen spritzen, es passiert nichts, weil diese DNA wird sofort abgebaut, zerstört. Meine Damen und Herren, wer RNA Impfstoffe als sicher und wirksam, lob preist. Wer behauptet, die Impfung würde nur seltenst ernsthafte Nebenwirkungen erzeugen, ist entweder unglaublich ignorant oder unendlich böse Und er macht sich Strafbar. So wie alle, die diese Impfung aktiv oder passiv betreiben und befürworten. Denn es ist heute wissenschaftlich erwiesen, dass die Impfung nur Negatives bewirken kann Und dies in lebensbedrohlichem Ausmaß. Zum Schluss etwas Positives. Die positive Botschaft für die Welt. Der alles entscheidende DNA Fund ist erst vor Monaten gemacht worden. Vorher konnte niemand erahnen, Dass Impfchargen mit Bakterien Chromosomen verunreinigt waren. Genauso wichtig, die Allgemeinheit konnte nicht ahnen, Dass sie eine Substanz injiziert bekamen, die überhaupt nicht geprüft worden war, nicht auf Wirksamkeit, nicht auf Sicherheit, nicht auf Inhalt, Schlichtweg. Deswegen, Werte, Ärzte, Kolleginnen und Kollegen, Sie können sich noch retten. Sie wurden getäuscht. Sie wurden missbraucht. Sie konnten nicht ahnen, Was und wie alles geschah. Aber jetzt wissen wir's. Und noch, noch Gibt es kurze Zeit zurückzukehren auf den Weg des Hippokrates? Nehmen Sie nie wieder eine Genspritze in die Hand, Und machen Sie Schluss mit der menschenverachtenden WHO. Im gleichen Kontext, Politiker Deutschlands, über alle Parteigrenzen hinweg, Auch Sie können sich mit der Absage an das Großverbrechen retten. Sie konnten erst recht das alles nicht gewusst haben. Auch Sie wurden getäuscht und missbraucht. Auch Sie können sich und Ihre Ehre noch retten. Ziehen Sie Ihren Kopf aus der Schlinge so schnell wie möglich. Bald wird es zu spät sein, denn die Welt versteht nun so langsam die Machenschaften. Und Sie werden nicht sagen können, dass der Weckruf Sie nicht erreicht hat. Agieren Sie gemeinsam jetzt Für Ihr Volk beschließen Sie, dass keine weiteren RNA Injektionen verabreicht werden dürfen, bis die lebenswichtigen, offenen Fragen geklärt sind. Und liebe Politiker, realisieren Sie doch, dass jeder Kaufvertrag, der auf Betrug und Täuschung ruht, für null und nichtig erklärt werden kann und muss. Verlangen Sie das Geld Ihres Volkes von den Herstellern dieser Betrugswahlen zurück. Und lassen Sie die Milliarden Ihrem Volk zukommen, vor allem den ärmsten Impfopfern und ihren Hinterbliebenen. Lieber Mitmenschen. Die Spaltung unserer Gesellschaft hat tiefer Kleben gezogen. Lasst uns jetzt zurück zueinander finden. Sagen Sie all denjenigen nein, die zu Marionetten von Macht und Geld geworden sind. Sagen Sie ja zu unserer Solidargemeinschaft, Die alleine dieses Land wie in Krisenzeiten zuvor wiederaufbauen kann und muss.
_aussie17
Posted - November 26, 2023 at 1:43 PM
Saved - November 26, 2023 at 4:06 PM

@_aussie17 - aussie17

Full transcript here - feel free to use for local translations. https://www.aussie17.com/p/prof-dr-sucharit-bhakdis-emotional

Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi's emotional address to the AfD faction at the German Parliament - Nov 12, 2023 Watch now (37 mins) | Transcript aussie17.com
_aussie17
Posted - November 22, 2023 at 1:26 AM
Saved - November 22, 2023 at 6:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent press conference, EU/FvD members, including MP Marcel De Graff and MP Joachim Kuhs, revealed shocking information from the EMA. The EMA clarified that corona vaccines were approved for individual immunizations, not for controlling or preventing infections. This contradicts government campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others. The EMA also acknowledged that vaccinated individuals can still get infected. The EMA's response undermines the vaccination policy and calls for accountability. The EMA's disregard for adverse events within 14 days of vaccination and the presence of GMO elements in mRNA vaccines raise concerns. The EMA must assess these risks and withdraw market approval. The obscured side effects and deaths associated with vaccines demand immediate action.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 JUST IN (21 Nov 2023) Press Conference from EU/FvD in the European Parliament led by MP Marcel De Graff @MJRLdeGraaff, MP Joachim Kuhs @Joachim_Kuhs, Willem Engel, Dr Vibeke Manniche and Max Schmeling Highlights------------------------------------------------ "Last month, I wrote a letter to the EMA with Joachim Kuhs and six other colleagues from the European Parliament. The European agency responsible for the admission of medicines to the European market. We asked for clarification on the many problems surrounding the corona vaccines. These problems are so great that we asked the EMA to withdraw the market admission. This month, we received an answer from the EMA to our letter. And this answer contains shocking facts. " "First of all, the EMA explicitly states that it has exclusively allowed the corona vaccines on the market for individual immunizations and absolutely not for the control of infection and absolutely not for preventing or reducing infections. And this is devastating for governments that have gone full circle with the message that you are doing it for someone else." "In fact, the EMA states that the exposure to the virus increases the chance of infections even in those vaccinated. The mass government campaigns to vaccinate yourself to protect your parents, your neighbors, the weaker in society, were not only unauthorized but also completely nonsense and not based on facts." "And I remind you once again that we are still fighting with a gigantic so-called unexplained excessive mortality In short, this information from the EMA is destructive to the developed vaccination policy of Rutte and de Jonge. The government knew that the vaccines would not protect against the spread of the virus, but did not share this information with the citizens. On the contrary, it forced the vaccines on our citizens with lies, obscured the side effects, and thus brought the health of everyone who had taken such a vaccine into danger. The vaccination campaigns should be stopped as soon as possible, and it is simply not safe." "And it does not meet the requirements set by the EMA. And the government and all political parties that supported this should be held accountable for their lies and fraud." "One of the major considerations for people whether or not to take a vaccine is the possible risks and side effects. EMA mentioned in its letter to us, they expect, I quote, "reports of conditions occurring at or soon after vaccination." End quote. This implies that data on adverse events or side effects within 14 days of vaccinations are of the utmost importance to assess the risks related to the vaccines. However, member state officials adopted the policy that as it would take 10 to 14 days for the vaccine to produce spike proteins, adverse events within 14 days after vaccination were not to be registered as related to the vaccination. Statistically, they considered the person who got the vaccine as not vaccinated within those first 14 days. What a nonsense!" "To be very clear, the mRNA is non-human and part of a GMO. Moreover, the recent publications on plasmid DNA contamination in these mRNA injection fluids proves beyond doubt that we are dealing with a GMO product. Regardless of the attempts to redefine the term GMO, following an EU court ruling from 2018, any innovation containing or derived from the use of genetic engineering techniques is to be considered the same as a GMO and subject to the same regulatory approval system. Now, integration of bacterial or viral genetic code into the human genome has been associated with a higher risk of cancer." "The EMA needs to assess all these statistics, the safety, and then take the decision. We demanded from the EMA to withdraw market approval immediately because of all these signals of people dying, of the myocarditis, pericarditis, people with this heart failure, dropping dead on the football field in front of television. That is all related to these vaccines. And that is what has been obscured by bad registration." -------------------------------------------------------

Video Transcript AI Summary
Marcel de Graaf, Willem Engel, and others discuss the safety issues and lack of informed consent surrounding COVID vaccines in a press conference. They highlight the existence of different batches of vaccines with varying risks, the failure of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to properly inform the public, and the potential long-term side effects. They also question the classification of the vaccines as vaccines rather than gene therapy and raise concerns about the manipulation of data and the lack of transparency. The speakers call for the withdrawal of market authorizations and accountability for those responsible.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Marcel de Graaf, for the IFD Willem Engel, Nederlein, Gescholt in pharmaceutical sciences Maval Och, human rights activist. This is on set and hard marked And under the The effect of on the batches, von Karhonafaxes, batch dependency, Lumrad, Maxi Statisticas, Vibeke is in Paris. After all, Poland, Srivic met Joachim Kuz and Nocze Scholejas from the Europes parliament and briefed under EMA. Over a developed problem on the COVID vaccines. And there's a problem in Zohr wrote that by the EMA Fuhrung on in tracking from the Mark Tula team. The in the Videwele Immunizarzi, an absolute need for behearsing van besmetting, an absolute need for that for coma of Verminere van Besmettingen. And it is ver Nitegend for rehehehehehehehehehehehehehehewol, opetKompanyin, Orcholssein Gesam at the Boatschap and under. The EIMACHAP no ferre, and for Klarstein, anndhorwart, anixi pier, EIMAS p ordenings a reporte over the 2 Latinform faxes benardiche next slide. The aim of Verklaert, her how the bloats telling anaphiras, verhoek to kanst of infectsies the Zorrofen, Ester, Guseldeforge, and Marcel de Graaf, Fierst, my deal today is informazi, nicht metteburgers in Tiefendell, etdrangevakseans, and also Bergevakseans, and also Bergevakseans, Verduso de De Beijewerkingen and Brachtier made a gesundheit from Idereen, disond Vaxseinche, nomheift in Gefaari. The Vaxidancy Companions Speaker 1: Thank you very much, Marcel. I beg your pardon for my bad pronunciation, my bad English, But, if I would have known that, we could I could speak in German, then I would have done it. But now I have an English script. Please, pardon me. There are so many red flags in this COVID affair that it almost hurts your eyes. There's a big thing at stake, the health of our citizens. Many of them have decided to be repeatedly vaccinated against COVID Based on the information they received from their government and doctors, they assumed that they had made a well informed choice and have an informed consent. But informed consent is only possible when the information spread by the member states and its authorities regard these vaccines is The government's vaccines is correct. When misinformation is spread by the governments of our member states, Doctors can't give good advice, and people can't make a good choice whether they want to be vaccinated or not. One of the major consideration for people Whether or not to take a vaccine is a possible risks and side effects. EMA mentioned in its letter to us, They expect, I quote, reports of conditions occurring at at or soon after vaccination, End quote. This implies that data on adverse events or side effects within 14 days of vaccinations Member state officials adopted the policy that as it would take 10 to 14 days for the vaccine to produce Bi proteins, At worst events within 14 days after vaccination were not to be registered as related to the vaccination. What a nonsense. Government policies and also governmental med media campaigns to promote COVID vaccinations are thus Leaving out the risks and side effects that might occur in those 1st 14 days. Most allergic Reactions occur within 20 minutes to 2 hours after getting into contact with the allergen. Side effects of regular vaccines, Our children get normally occur within 1 to 2 days, but yet somehow they just invented This 14 days story to create this fake feeling of security and reducing the amounts of registered side effects. And that's my impression. They did it because they knew from the reports Pfeiffer and Madonna and so on, that many and severe side effects will come. Where are the governmental policies then based on how can doctors correctly advise their patients whether or not to take the vaccines? How can a citizen who is thinking about vaccination then assess for himself the safety of the COVID vaccines? How can there then be a truly informed choice and thus a valid consent when this crucial information is not shared? And why did the EMA not intervene? How can they upheld some market authorization when there is no accurate registration of It was also recently disclosed that the side effects registration institute in the US called VAERS has one register that's public and another closed database that is only available for certain pharmaceutical companies and officials. The closed database contains more more serious and more detailed side effects than the database that is not publicly accessible. That is, of course, unheard of and unacceptable. In this way, the ordinary citizen Who only has access to the public database if not correctly and fully informed about the risks, and, therefore, the citizen cannot give a A truly informed contribution to the vaccination. In Europe, we have a similar database called OITRAVigilance, Do they also have a closed and a public version? Are they also misleading our citizens? I don't know the answers, But we must get this question answered as soon as possible. The health of our citizens is at stake and the next COVID booster Campaigns have already started. Thank you for your attention. Speaker 0: Thank you. Thank you, Joachim. And now I'd like to to give the The floor to, Willem Engel. Speaker 2: Thank you. Speaker 3: So we are here today to inform you, the public and its representatives, About the grave errors and safety issues with the mRNA injections. You've heard from the previous speakers what political mortal sins have been committed by the EMA and the European Commission willfully misleading the public and using pseudoscience and public office to nudge, push and even force people into participating into an uncontrolled and potentially deadly experiment. The EMA has admitted that the information given to the public is not adequate for informed consent. Moreover, the lack of proof for transmission control from the start made the campaign of vaccinating for the other a scam, an illegal marketing campaign That the EMA tries to hide behind the fact that it's just advising the European Commission is weak and unbecoming of an agency that was founded to protect the European public against medical and pharmaceutical mistakes. Moreover, the argument that it would Be a disservice to the frail and elderly who are at risk from corona infection is a false argument as the whole population was forced in some way to participate in this real world experiment. From the EMA and other national institutes, we keep hearing that the Benefits outweigh the risks for each specific case or group. Yet we have seen no assessment or calculation. We have to assume this is a marketing line as it is not backed up by facts. The reality is that We are dealing with a public health crisis as we speak, not caused by a virus, but by these mRNA injections. Many 1,000 have been injured and cannot live a normal life because they were forced to participate in a potentially deadly experiment. Ignoring the Aarhus Treaty is a violation of international law that we have raised, and with us National institutes like the Commission For Genetic Modification, the COHEM. In their reports, they argue that the exemption under directive 20 twenty slash 1043 should be void as it cannot be in the interest of the public to skip studies on environmental impact and human health due to genetically modified organisms, which were used to produce the mRNA injections. To be very clear, the mRNA is nonhuman and part of a GMO. Moreover, the recent publications on plasmid DNA contamination in these mRNA injection fluids proves beyond doubt that we are dealing with a GMO product, regardless the attempts to redefine the term GMO Following an EU court ruling from 2018, any innovation containing or derived from the use of genetic engineering techniques is to be considered the same as an M GMO and subject to the same regulatory approval system. Now, integration of bacterial or viral genetic code into the human genome has been associated with a higher risk of cancer. Whether that will be the case, we don't know. But we should have known, more precisely, the EMA should have known, before giving a positive advice. Another serious concern is the interaction with the microbiome each person carries. By integration of antibiotic resistant genes, Some bacterial or fungal strains could become a health risk. An attempt was made to classify these injections as vaccines, An attempt that continues to this day. In regulation 2009 slash, 120, a line is misinterpreted. Gene therapy shall not include vaccines against infectious diseases. It should be read as mutually exclusive. Two essential components of a vaccine is long lasting immunity, also called active immunity as opposed to the passive immunity derived from antibody therapies. Secondly, a vaccine should contain an antigen. None of the mRNA injections contain an antigen. Using redefinition, omission, and skewing, An appointed expert group has tried to circumvent the regulations guarding the safety on gene therapy by silently changing the classification and and conditions for the marketing application of these mRNA injections. In the directives 2019 slash five And 2021 slash 756, the words corona and coding sequence were added to the conditions after the granting of the original marketing authorizations, making these authorizations themselves proof of fraud. The EMA in her reply is well aware of what happened, but tried to evade answering the questions about the legitimacy of the marketing applications by stating this is a political matter and should be taken up with the European Commission. Rest assured, we will. We will not stop until all mRNA injections are taken off the market. All victims are acknowledged, and those responsible For the biggest scandal in medical history are held accountable. Thank you for your attention. Speaker 0: Thank you, Willem. For you. You have cut the floor. Speaker 4: Yes. Thank you for having us. And I do agree that it's a public health crisis we are in the midst of. I'm one of 3 scientists who are behind the study of batch dependency safety issues, and Max will talk about that in a minute. But what we actually have shown, just to put it shortly, is that there was and still is 3 patterns of the side effects, both Less of the serious side effects and the more serious side effects and also the death. Max will show in a minute, which shows that from the beginning, the batches which were given were the so called bad batches. Actually, along the way, it changed whether whether it was Pfizer who changed the product, whether it was the transportation, we don't know. But what we know is that the patients or the people, the children, the young ones, the elderly who had these side effects, They weren't informed by the risk. They didn't have the benefit. You didn't have the beneficial and the the risk ratio, and some were given very bad batches. And that we know from our study. And that reminds me of what, the vice president from Pfizer said at one point in Nature. She said that, they were building the airplane while flying. And for me, that's obviously what happened because we've shown that one of the wings fell off. And then I'm like, well, if you know you have a safety issue, why don't you handle that safety issue? Why don't you withdraw the batches? Why don't you communicate to the, public? Which EMAN did and all the national, similar institutes didn't. And what our study also shows is that you have this safety issue, but it also shows that, EMA and the national institutions should have actually informed the public because Pfizer did that already in August 21. They actually informed the IMEI that there was a safety issue. They informed the IMEI that some of the badges, what we call the blue badges, gave many more side effects than some of the other batches. So we know that already. We have just replicated our data, into Sweden, which shows us us that It's a European matter. It's not just a Danish matter. It's a European issue. We know that now from Sweden. And I'm quite sure if we looked into the data From the rest of Europe, we would see exactly the same pattern. And what we are now into is that what we've shown was the short term, side effects, But we are very much interested into looking into the long term side effects. You mentioned cancer. Will there be a relation of certain cancers Toward, the the different batches, will there be, a difference between the all cause mortality? You have mentioned, Marcel, the excess mortality. We know from the data that since May 21, it was, like, literally literally on the spot that excess mortality happened In all the European countries, we have, seen those graphs or made those graphs ourselves, and we can see that the excess mortality is still there. Some places may be waning a little, but there's still an excess mortality, and that is very varying. And that brings me back to that I think I would have expected as a citizen. I'm not a politician. I'm just a doctor. I would have expected EMA to react on these data. Even before we published the data in April, I would have expected that they saw the safety issue, that they saw that in the database, and that they, You know, halted some of the vaccination, at least withdrawn, these blues batches and also informed The population, the young ones, the elderly and so on, we do have a problem. So going back to the the thing that the vice president from from Pfizer said, That they were building the airplane while flying, I must say the wing fell off. Thank you. Speaker 0: Thank you. And now I'd like to give the floor to Max Meiling, who is the statistician, who did all the data processing. Max, you have the floor. Speaker 2: Thank you very much. My name is Max Meeling, and I'm the statistician behind this study, Where BIPOCA is the medical, the medical capacity behind it. The, as you can see in front of you on this screen, is the result, The main result of our study, it shows from the official Danish data that we queried For the study, it shows each batch and how many, how many adverse reactions were present in each batch. You can see that along the y axis, the vertical axis, and along the horizontal axis, you can see how big were the batches. I should perhaps just mention a batch is a unit of vaccine that is produced, filled into vials, packaged up and sent out to different countries. As you can see from the graph, some of these batches are very small. Some of them are very big. And in this case, if we, assume that we would see a normal vaccine, a really good vaccine, something that was very consistently produced, We would see a near perfect line, one near perfect line. If we, on the other hand, produce A really horrible vaccine, the worst one we could possibly conceive. We would see no line. We would see just scattered dots. In this case, We see 3, not 1, but we see 3 lines, and they are actually near perfect. The problem with this is that it's obviously, it's something that is completely outside the category of what we should expect to see in adverse Adverse data. And in this case, it very clearly shows right away that It was because of the product's nature, it has been impossible for the, for the participants, for the vaccinees, People who receive the vaccines to give informed consent because if you cannot know the risk, how can how, how can you make Informed consent. How can you give informed consent? That's the main finding of this study, but something that is also very troubling is This shows a system. It shows a structure in the data. Adverse reactions, error, errors in production are, by nature, they're random. But this shows structure. We do not know yet why, But we're obviously researching this this issue, as BB Goetz also mentioned. But, As of now, we do not know why it is, but the only thing that we do know is that this should, by no means, be present. And that is why it's a very alarming safety signal, as has been mentioned. And I would like to stress again this this makes it Absolutely impossible to give informed consent. And I think I would like to stop there. Okay. Thank you. Speaker 0: Thank you, Max. I think you made it very clear that, there are 3 different types of batches, and every batch gives another risk. And, the blue one gives the highest mortality risk. And nobody knew upfront which batch he would get. Nobody knew that there was this difference between these batches. Nobody knew. But the EMA gets samples of every batch, and they can test it, and they can see whether or not they they are identical. And that's their job because their job is to protect us from, mistakes made by pharmaceutical industries. And they didn't. So that's it's very worrying. Thank you for, for making that clear, both of you. And that is also something that, in a second letter to the AMA we are going to address. Be sure of that, as are the things as contamination, by DNA of bacteria in the vaccines, as, are the things that, Joachim mentioned about, are there two databases with adverse, events. How come that the, EMA never warned us? And how could it be that they accepted governments to campaign, for off label use? Is there anyone who would like to ask a question? We still have some minutes before we round up. Yes, please. Speaker 5: 1st of all, thank you very much for your contribution, to this press conference. I have a question in the letter of summons. One of the arguments you have made with regards to the suspension of the marketing authorizations is That in the SMPCs of Pfizer and Moderna, that they are now very comprehensive and unreadable. However, one thing is very clear. I saw on page 4 of the document of the SMPC that is by now 574 pages. It literally mentions some cases required intensive care support and fatal cases have been observed, quote unquote. And, my question is how is it possible that the marketing authorizations have not been suspended And also withdrawn immediately by the EMA, since Pfizer and Moderna themselves admit that the remedy is now worse than the disease. Could you maybe elaborate on that a little bit? Speaker 0: I can tell you this, that's a question for the EMA. The EMA needs to, assess, all these statistics, the safety, and then take the decision. We demanded from the EMA to withdraw market approval immediately because of all these, sick Sorry. Signals of people dying of the myocarditis, pericarditis, people, with this heart failure dropping debt, on the football field, in front of television. That is all, related to these vaccines. And that is what, it has been obscured, obscured by bad registration. So, yes, It's a very, valid point. It only stresses that even now the the pharmaceutical industry is making this, clear statements in their, additional information of 5 74 pages. Sorry. I mean, that is not accessible information for a medical doctor or for a patient. They need to make a very concise, small, clear, list of side effects and, and and the probability. How much how probable how often does it occur? Like, 1 in 10,000, for instance. If 1 in 10,000 vaccinated, will drop dead sorry to put it dead blunt because of the vaccine, then it is much worse than, getting, a COVID infection. So that stated, I think the ball lies now with the EMA to take measures. Thank you. Other questions? None? Okay. [SPEAKER MARCEL DIEGE:] Speaker 5: Well, maybe one more, because, it seems that, You have to have, separate, SMPCs per booster. Could you elaborate on that maybe a little bit more, mister Engel? Speaker 3: Yeah. It's Strange that we see 1 document for all the the variants they have produced. The reasoning of the EMA is that it's Still the same marketing application, and it's a very, concerning point. We see that the clinical trials We're just ongoing for 3 weeks, yet the XBB 1.5 booster was granted a market, authorization. So the EMA really does not follow its own guidelines, and they have created a sort of, punched, A hole in this, overdraftilence, safety registration. So now we have untested, Speaker 0: Okay. Well, sorry, it's, we have to end this, no more questions. Thank you all very much for attending this press conference. Thank you very much for listening or watching us, Speaker 3: Every nation in every region now has a decision to make decisions. Speaker 1: You think I'm joking? Speaker 0: Predator drugs. You Speaker 1: will never see it coming.
View Full Interactive Feed