TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @_pblanknews
reSee.it AI Summary
I examined Palantir: The New Deep State. A former Palantir worker warns the company, founded by Peter Thiel, claims to revolutionize government with AI. They’ve worked with DoD, FBI, ICE, Wendy’s, and possibly DOGE. I listened to CEO Alex Karp and reviewed research to expose their sales pitch, how they capitalize on fear, and what More Perfect Union says about building working-class power and holding corporate power accountable.
@_pblanknews - Jordan Chain
Palantir: The New Deep State A former Palantir employee is sounding the alarm. The tech company, founded by Peter Thiel, claims they can revolutionize government systems with their AI-powered software. They’ve been hired by the Department of Defense, the FBI, ICE, and even Wendy’s. Now DOGE will likely hire Palantir as well. We talked to a former Palantir employee, dug into decades of research and listened to hours of Palantir CEO Alex Karp's own words to carefully unwrap the layers of Palantir’s carefully cultivated sales pitch — and how they capitalize on fear and unrest to make money. ----- More Perfect Union’s mission is to build power for working people. Here’s what that means: We report on the real struggles and challenges of the working class from a working-class perspective, and we attempt to connect those problems to potential solutions. We report on the abuses and wrongdoing of corporate power, and we seek to hold accountable the ultra-rich who have too much power over America’s political and economic systems. Source-https://youtu.be/DZ95Gmvg_D4?si=cA9FSKSUyKiD5oD-
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript surveys Palantir’s rise as a powerful data analytics company intertwined with government and military aims, emphasizing how fear, surveillance, and control have shaped its growth and public image. It frames Palantir as aiming to become “the ultimate military contractor and the ultimate arbiter of all of our data,” with its software described as enabling governments and major institutions to collect, analyze, and act on vast datasets, including in war zones.
Key points include:
- Palantir’s positioning and clients: The company claims it can revolutionize government systems with AI-powered data analysis and has been hired by the Department of Defense, the FBI, local police, the IRS, and other entities, including non-government customers like Wendy’s. Its business model is described as transforming “information those organizations collect, collect even more information, and use that data to draw conclusions.”
- The kill chain concept and AI: Palantir’s tech is linked to the “kill chain,” a military term for the series of decisions leading to targeting and potentially taking life. Palantir’s contract adds AI to this chain, making it “quicker and better and safer and more violent.”
- Founding story and rhetoric: Palantir traces its origins to a PayPal-connected network (the “PayPal mafia”) and to Alex Karp, who studied neoclassical social theory, with the company named after Tolkien’s Palantir. Middle-earth imagery is used to juxtapose potential good versus dangerous power.
- Data, surveillance, and ontology: The software is described as capable of reconfiguring an organization’s ontology—what systems matter, what information matters, how processes are structured, and what biases are introduced.
- Inside views and ethics: A former Palantir employee, Juan, explains his departure and later criticisms after observing the Israeli invasion of Gaza; Palantir’s involvement with the Israeli Defense Forces is noted, though contract details are opaque. The claim is that Palantir’s AI may have been used for target selection.
- Revenue and focus on government: In 2024 Palantir earned nearly $2.9 billion, with 55% from government sources, most of it American. Palantir’s CTO Sham Sankar is cited with a Defense Reformation rhetoric that aligns with the Defense Innovation Board’s push to fund emerging tech, suggesting a fusion of defense spending and Palantir’s growth.
- Domination and market strategy: Palantir is depicted as striving to be the “US government’s central operating system,” with Doge (an internal effort) aimed at unifying data across agencies like the IRS and Health and Human Services, potentially giving one contractor broad access to Americans’ data and health records.
- Corporate culture and risk: The company is described as comfortable being unpopular, with leaders like Peter Thiel investing heavily and having a role in politics; Karp emphasizes civil liberties in terms of lawful use of government data and its potential misapplication.
- Ethical tension and viewpoint: The piece notes that Palantir’s reach could enable governance by algorithm and automated decision-making, potentially reshaping personal lives, battlefields, and governance. The founders’ ownership structure preserves control through class voting shares.
- Final reflections: The speakers argue that criticizing the system is fraught because watching and fear can silence dissent, and warn against replacing a broken system with an even more broken one, urging vigilance over who wields powerful data and AI.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Criticize your former employer, it's taboo to do that. But to criticize an employer that also owns extremely lethal technologies and surveillance technologies that are highly invasive and used in war zones is is something else entirely.
Speaker 1: It's 2025. We're all kinda used to government surveillance. The idea that we're all being watched all the time and don't own our own personal data has become normalized. We're also used to the military spending vast amounts of our money on just a few giant defense contractors. But one tech company wants to change both of those things.
Become the ultimate military contractor and the ultimate arbiter of all of our data.
Speaker 2: Palantir is here to disrupt and make our the institutions we partner with the very best in the world and when it's necessary to scare enemies and on occasion kill them.
Speaker 3: Check out Palantir shares surging 22 after the company cited a boom in demand for its AI software from the US government.
Speaker 2: We we're doing it. We're doing it. And I'm sure you're enjoying this as much as I am.
Speaker 1: Palantir, a tech company based here in Denver, claims they can revolutionize government systems with their data analysis software newly powered by artificial intelligence. They've been hired by the Department of Defense, the FBI, local police departments, and even the IRS and Wendy's to take in the information those organizations collect, collect even more information, and use that data to draw conclusions.
Speaker 0: It can be used to completely reconfigure organization's ontology, its reality, what systems matter, what information matters, what processes matter, how they are structured, what biases are introduced at each of those stages.
Speaker 1: We talked to a former Palantir employee, dug into decades of research, and listened to hours of Alex Karp's own words to unwrap the layers of Palantir's carefully cultivated sales pitch, how they capitalize on fear, uncertainty, and unrest. I for danger. Let's rewind a little. Palantir's story starts with one of the most effective things a company can have for sales: fear. After the September eleventh attacks, The United States began expanding surveillance both at home and abroad.
This was, of course, a boon for the defense industry at large. Simultaneously, the Silicon Valley tech industry was growing fast and making people in a once obscure industry very, very rich, very, very quickly. Like the founders and executives at PayPal, known as the PayPal mafia. Elon Musk, Reid Hoffman, the LinkedIn guy, and Peter Thiel. When PayPal was sold, Thiel had millions of dollars burning a hole in his pocket and an idea.
PayPal had developed systems for detecting fraud and crimes on the platform. What if they could use similar thinking to analyze the world at large? So Thiel pulled from his network to build out a new company. One of the first hires was Thiel's Stanford Law School roommate, Alex Karp, who'd gone on after Stanford to get a PhD in not business or computer science or engineering, but neoclassical social theory. They named the company Palantir, after the Palantiri from J.
R.
Speaker 0: R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings. In Lord of the Rings, a Palantir stone is a magical object that allows its users to predict the future or to see what's going on in a remote location.
Speaker 4: It was originally created by the elves. It was meant to be used for good purposes. It is potentially a very dangerous technology. It's very powerful. Here we go.
Speaker 0: Long have you hunted me.
Speaker 1: So that's Middle Earth. But what does Palantir do in a regular earth?
Speaker 2: What we do is we use what legal scholars call predicate based search. So we would look at you and then we would go out and say, oh, there's lots of different things in your life that may be indicative of someone being, someone involved in bad behavior.
Speaker 1: Put simpler, they make software that makes it easier for their customer to collect and analyze data and then act on that analysis with and without AI. By 2013, ten years after their founding, Palantir's client list included the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, the marines, the air force, special operations command, and more.
Speaker 2: Did your company helped to track and kill Osama bin Laden? You know, we can never tell you the closest thing to an answer
Speaker 4: is like
Speaker 2: there are when you when you look at the like when you open the paper and look in the news about these kinds of things, there's a two thirds chance, depending on the country involved, that somehow my company was involved.
Speaker 0: Fundamentally, the mission that is pushed to employees is that we're solving the world's hardest problems and supporting Western institutions. That is the main driver of of sort of this militaristic culture that is developed inside of Palantir.
Speaker 2: If you do not feel comfortable supporting the legitimate efforts of America and its allies in the context of war, don't join Palantir.
Speaker 0: This entire message of, like, we are the most lethal, we are the most able to to surveil and process large amounts of data.
Speaker 2: You have created the system, which you call kill chain privately. Privately. Publicly, the lawyers have some innocuous. So something like tech for the amelioration of unwanted blah, blah, blah. Some term we're supposed to
Speaker 1: use.
Speaker 2: Okay. Let's
Speaker 1: For me, it's the kill chain. Kill chain sounds good. Kill chain isn't an original term created by Palantir. It's the more general military verbiage for the series of decisions leading from identifying a target to taking their life. Palantir's contract added their software and artificial intelligence to the kill chain.
It's quicker and better and safer and more violent. It's tech that Juan helped market.
Speaker 0: It reduces the distance you have to the problem, but when you're able to take a step back and really see all the narratives and how they were shaped and the actual application of these technologies, your whole world starts falling apart, which is something that, you know, definitely happened to me.
Speaker 1: Juan didn't leave Palantir entirely for ethical reasons. He just got another job. But the reason he eventually started speaking out against Palantir came after watching the Israeli invasion of Gaza following the October. Palantir has contracts with the Israeli Defense Forces. The exact nature of the contracts is opaque intentionally, but there is evidence to suggest that Palantir's artificial intelligence tech was used for selecting targets in Gaza.
Karp doesn't mind the controversy. In fact, it's part of the marketing. Palantir will even pick up the projects that other companies rejected for political reasons.
Speaker 2: We are very comfortable being unpopular.
Speaker 1: Karp doesn't think controversy will lose Palantir customers.
Speaker 2: Whatever is pissing them off, they're still buying the product.
Speaker 1: Wendy's hired Palantir to help with their supply chain. Palantir works with health insurance companies to build AI for denials management to protect revenue. Do you want Palantir's AI making decisions about what care is covered for you and your loved ones? They also do business with for profit hospitals, major investment banks, and even other defense contractors. In 2024, Palantir brought in nearly $2,900,000,000 in revenue, 55% of which came from government sources with the vast majority being American.
So let's look at their pitch to the American government. Last year, Palantir's CTO, Sham Sankar, put out a presentation and white paper called The Defense Reformation. He cites The Last Supper, which was a secretive 1993 meeting between defense industry executives and the deputy secretary of defense. Over a dozen companies walked in and only a few walked out. That dinner is often cited as the origin of our consolidated military industrial complex.
Speaker 5: And to me, I think this was the definitive moment that kicked off the financialization of defense. From that point forward, it became all about buybacks and dividends and leverage ratios.
Speaker 1: Criticizing the financialization of the defense industry, calling out stock buybacks, that doesn't sound like a defense executive. That sounds more like the exact argument about the defense industry that we have made before.
Speaker 0: I think what's interesting to
Speaker 1: me about Poundeer is how they co opt the language of revolution. But Sankar's argument did work on somebody, Uncle Sam. The Defense Innovation Board, an advisory group within the Department of Defense, cited Sankara's presentation multiple times in their 2024 report on why the DOD needs to divert more of their budget to emerging technology. That's giving money to Palantir. There's a reason Palantir just replaced Ford Motors in the S and P 100 in the months after Trump was elected.
The Trump administration is an ideal customer for what Palantir is selling. First, there are many former Palantir employees sprinkled across the Trump administration from inside Doge to foreign policy advisers to high level technology appointees. And Palantir cofounder Peter Thiel heavily invested in the company is also heavily invested in president Trump and vice president Vance. He was a major campaign donor to both. Then the stated goal of Doge is to streamline and combine government data, which is exactly what Palantir does.
Speaker 0: But the ways that the government is defrauded is that the computer systems don't talk to each other.
Speaker 1: And obviously, Carp is loving it.
Speaker 2: Disruption at the end of the day exposes things that aren't working. There'll be ups and downs. There's a revolution. Some people can get their heads cut off. Like, you know, it's like we're we're we're expecting to see really unexpected things and to win.
Speaker 1: And what is winning according to Palantir? This is CTO Shyam Sankar in 2021.
Speaker 6: Turning to government. We continue to advance our mission of becoming the US government's central operating system as we extend our footprint across defense, health care, and civilian agencies.
Speaker 1: The government's operating system. They want everything to funnel through Palantir. Palantir already has contracts with the IRS, going through taxpayer data to save auditors time by finding the easiest audits to pursue. Now, Wired reports, Doge will likely hire Palantir to create unified software for the entire IRS, a mega API that would allow anyone with access to view and possibly alter all IRS data in one place. That's all of your financial information.
And they have multiple contracts with the Department of Health and Human Services, including nearly $100,000,000 to support HHS's core administrative data and applications to manage, ingest, and access data securely across business domains. HHS's core responsibility is Medicare and Medicaid. That's control over millions of Americans' health records and their access to health care. So what does it mean for one contractor to have all that power, data, and taxpayer money as profit, especially as AI gets involved.
Speaker 0: As we kind of increasingly live in a simulated world, we lose touch with reality and the human decisions that matter, and we move closer towards governance by algorithm, not only made by decisions of automated artificial intelligence systems, which is a problem, but more importantly subject to decisions made by the people who are influencing these AI systems and creating them in order fill an agenda for whatever their profit seeking or control seeking objectives are. And when I see Doge kind of going into every agency and addressing the IT department first, I see it as an opportunity to try to change reality itself.
Speaker 1: But so what? Why am I telling you all of this? Palantir has no problem being seen as big brother, as all powerful, as lethal even.
Speaker 0: We're at the brink of using these technologies potentially to to run our government, to run our battlefields, and our personal lives. Using artificial intelligence as a sort of panacea solution across our federal departments and especially when they're, again, wielded by people with a very distinct agenda puts everyone at risk.
Speaker 1: It almost feels like that's been the plan all along. Here's cofounder Peter Thiel in 2010 at Libertopia, a libertarian conference, speaking about tech companies and government.
Speaker 4: The basic idea was that, we could never win an election on on on on getting certain things because we were in such a small minority. But maybe you could actually unilaterally change the world without having to constantly convince people and beg people and plead with people who are never gonna agree with you through technological means. And this is where I think technology is this incredible alternative to politics.
Speaker 1: And here's Alex Karp in 2,009 on civil liberties with regards to Palantir's work.
Speaker 2: The central question, in my view, of civil liberties is how it's not if the government has data, because let's assume the government has as much data as a health insurance company. It's how is that data being used? Is it being used in a way that's lawful? Meaning, do they have the right to use it? And is it being migrated into places that's not allowed to be used?
We allow enforcement of rules that government ought to enforce. And by the way, my experience is they want to enforce or at very least know they need to enforce. And if it's framed in that way, then you can have what is the ultimate Silicon Valley solution.
Speaker 1: One cofounder openly wants to use the power of the tech industry to affect politics. The other wants his company to have oversight over how the government data they're paid to handle is used. And the founders of Palantir will retain control in the company no matter what through an obscure ownership structure. Their class f shares grant them 49.99% of voting power even if they collectively own as little as 6% of the company.
Speaker 0: At the start of this journey, was extremely afraid for the repercussions of this writing, of speaking out. But now I'm, like, you know, even more convinced that this is absolutely necessary.
Speaker 1: We can't replace our current broken system with an even more broken one. And we can't let the worst people in Silicon Valley become our government.
Speaker 0: It's not about whether you're actually at risk for speaking out or not. It's just the idea that somebody's watching you is enough to push people into silence.
@_pblanknews - Jordan Chain
David Icke claims globalist leaders and billionaires are apart of a satanic cult and doing satanic rituals to “evil entities” According to him they are interdimensional beings trying to control humanity. https://t.co/4mDvkVO7nd
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on the idea that a set of nonhuman forces have long purportedly manipulated humanity. It references the Nag Hammadi library, noting that a fifth of its documents describe archons, Greek for rulers, as a nonhuman presence manipulating humans. The entities’ devil figure is identified as the Demiurge or Yaldabaoth. The conversation then brings in Krayta Mutwa, a Zulu shaman from South Africa, who allegedly describes legends and accounts of a nonhuman force taking a reptilian form and manipulating human society. The speakers assert that this same theme appears globally.
The topic then moves to ancient history, where it is claimed that ancients performed sacrificial rituals to these gods, especially sacrificing children. The question raised is what the gods gain from these sacrifices. The implication advanced is that today’s wealthy elites participate in satanic rituals to these same gods, a pattern the speaker connects to documented cases such as footage from Bohemian Grove, associated with figures like George W. Bush, and claims that royal families, including the British and Dutch royal families, are major players in this “satanic ritual culture.”
The conversation then ties these practices to the broader concept of feeding on human energy. The speaker references the first Matrix movie where Morpheus presents humans as batteries in a computer-generated dream world, using this as a metaphor to suggest that the gods feed off human energy. It is claimed that the gods or entities feed off a particular type of human energy generated by emotions and thoughts, with scientists purportedly having determined frequencies associated with different emotions.
The speakers also discuss how people can sense energy in environments, such as feeling a “bad energy” in a room, or in a house with a history of dark events. They describe how individuals involved in negative actions emit a vibe, which can influence others unless the frequency is changed. The overarching claim is that these energies or frequencies are the driving force behind the interactions with these ancient and modern powers, tying together ancient sacrifices, modern satanic rituals, and the science of emotional frequencies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the, content of the documents goes further back. And a fifth of these documents, they're known as the Nagamadi library now, are describing a nonhuman force manipulating humanity from the hidden, which they call archons, which in Greek means rulers. You can see why they called them that. And their devil figure and Shaytan Iblis figure is called the Demiurge or Yaldabaoth. Then I I talked to the great Zulu shaman, Krayta Mutwa in South Africa, spent days and days talking to him, who describes their legends and accounts of a nonhuman force manipulating human society, which, they say took a reptilian, reptilian form.
And all around the world, you pick up this same theme. And then as I was investigating, because if you if you if you go back in in what we call ancient history, the ancients were doing sacrificial rituals to these gods. Right? And, they were sacrificing, particularly children. The reason for that
Speaker 1: There was actually one found recently, the frozen girl. Yeah. She was a sacrifice that that 13,000 years old or whatever. I can't remember how long.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But what they what they did, was they in those days, because it was acceptable. God knows why. They did it openly. Right?
And and and it was a sacrifice to the gods. And I'll come to this in a second, but my question was, so what do the freaking gods get out of it then? Well, I now understand. And then I'm investigating these rich and famous billionaires of today who are players in this coal. And again and again and again, I'm led into satanism and pedophilia.
Those two are absolutely connected, for reasons I explain in the books. And what are these bloody billionaires doing satanic ritual sacrifices to to their version of the gods? Right? Is this like the old god where we see in the footage that Alex Jones took? Yeah.
In Bohemian Grove. Yeah. With George
Speaker 1: Bush and all of them with their algors there.
Speaker 0: They're they're doing it to the same gods. Right? They're same freaking entities that the ancients were doing the sacrifices to and were terrified of. These people today are doing the sacrifices to in the cold. And I've talked to people all over the world, over the decades.
I've been doing this a long time. Thirty four years, I'm I've been doing it now. No. Coming up thirty four years. And I've met satanists and people that took part in rituals against their will, who have have told me of their experiences, and they they these are major major players like the royal family, British royal family, Dutch royal family, all that stuff, all major players in this in this satanic ritual culture.
And so then I asked that question I I mentioned a few minutes ago. Oh, so what do the gods get out of it? I take you back to the first Matrix movie, and the Morpheus character holds up a battery, and he says, the Matrix is a computer generated dream world designed to turn humans into one of these, a battery. And that's when a massive understanding started to, started to come to me from many different sources, which I talk about in the books. These, quote, gods, these entities are feeding off human energy, but it's a particular type of human energy.
This is mainstream science. Again, every time we feel emotion, every time we think, we're generating frequencies. And those frequencies, in terms of what the frequencies are, relate to the nature of the emotion and the nature of the thought. And scientists have worked out what these frequencies are for different emotions. Right?
And
Speaker 1: Is that like when you go into a room and you kind of feel like, oh, there's a a bad energy in here?
Speaker 0: Yeah. You know what mean? Yeah. I mean, if if you go into a like an an old house where there's been a lot of really bad things going on. See, when the bad things are going on, the people involved in the bad things are giving off that vibe.
And unless someone goes into that house and changes the frequency, they sit there vibrating. So you go into it, and you think, oh, this is horrible. God. Because you're picking the vibe up. Mhmm.
Right? So these these are the energies I'm talking about. So
@_pblanknews - Point Blank News
Leaked Document from NASA? #ufotwitter #ufoX https://t.co/PWbcIrvZ3T
Video Transcript AI Summary
Trevor Coppola interviews Deborah Tavares about a significant NASA document from 2001, which discusses future warfare involving robots, cyborgs, and humans. The document, available on NASA's website, contains alarming predictions, including the use of biological attacks and electromagnetic pulses against Americans. It highlights a shift in perception of humans as liabilities and discusses advanced technologies for warfare, such as beam weapons and aerosolized micro dust. Tavares emphasizes the need for public awareness and education about these strategies, suggesting that understanding documents like the Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars and the Iron Mountain report is crucial. She warns that the elite are manipulating society through propaganda and advanced technology, leading to a potential loss of freedom and health. The conversation concludes with a call for grassroots movements to combat these threats.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is Trevor Coppola for Anthony j Hilder. I'm with, Deborah Tavares, and we're gonna discuss a few topics here.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for the interview. I appreciate the opportunity. One of the things that we wanna talk about is what we were discussing a little bit ago and that is the significance of this NASA war document that was found on the NASA website and the need to urgently get this out in front of of many as many people as possible because of the content of this document.
Speaker 0: So was this document available to everyone or this was on their actual website and someone found it?
Speaker 1: That is correct. It was on the NASA website and, it was a document that actually is a PowerPoint presentation by Dennis Bushnell, the chief NASA scientist at the Langley Center. And it was presented in 2001, July of 2001, just a few months before 911. And, what brought my attention to it and immediately rang some, uncomfortable realizations was when I first when we first came across it, it says on the website, fush future strategic issues, future warfare circa 2025. And, as I decided to just flip through it quickly to see what it was about, I was a little stunned on page 4.
It said, the presentation is based in all cases upon existing data trends analysis technologies, no pixie dust. And the entire premise of the document or the PowerPoint is about robots, cyborgs, and humans. So I immediately saw, a conflict between future and now. And I thought, what are they covering up? Because that was a definite cover up.
And then I started to continue looking through the document with shock. And that's why we're talking right now because I think most people would be shocked to find on page 93.
Speaker 0: So so who wrote this NASA document and was this intentional? Did they want the public to see this, do you think? Or
Speaker 1: Well, again, the Illuminati, the most wealthy, rich men on the face of the planet, always telegraph everything that they're going to do. So the fact that it was on the NASA website it was certainly available to the public but did they see it? Obviously not. Because had they looked at this document, you would know about it right now, and we don't. And that's the purpose of this discussion is for people to know about this document.
Again, the conflict between the future and the fact that they said it was a current reality in 2,001 July when this was actually presented. And what it said which was quite shocking on page 93 It said, capture torture Americans in living color on prime time. And that is an unbelievable statement. Then it's followed up by saying, terror attacks within the continental United States using binary biologicals take down critical infrastructure. They are going to use an EMP, which is an electromagnetic pulse.
They're going to use, radiation frequencies against our brains, etcetera, and conduct serious sci war and collateral damage and exploitation. On the same page 93 they say exploit CNN Syndrome. Now CNN of course is the network, the news media network propaganda machine and was set up by the CIA. You can watch the movie called Sci War on stop thecrime.net for all the background information on CNN. Very, very interesting, information.
Then you go on and you read that, on page 66. They say increasingly critical are human limitations and human downsides. Humans are too large, humans are too heavy, too tender, humans are too slow both physically and mentally, and we require huge logistical trains, meaning we cost way too much money to maintain, and humans have rapidly decreasing to negative value. Can you even believe this? I mean you're hearing this and it's got to be rather shocking coming off of a NASA website, particularly when some of the agencies that are involved are the US Air Force, DARPA, the CIA, the FBI, Southern Command, Atlantic Command, Australian Department of Defense and other agencies.
This is the corporation's agencies. We are USA Inc. We're no longer under a constitution as proclaimed in the Iron Mountain report which everyone should read on stop the crime dot net. You can download it not only as the document, but you can watch the, documentary, which I highly recommend. You will see how the, stealth and deceptive incrementally positioned, attacks upon the constitution have rendered us now a corporation.
And we do no we no longer have a legitimate government. We are being or controlled by or by, corporations and banks that are posing as a legitimate government, and they're not. We wouldn't have a legitimate government with the war machine stating what they were gonna do on the continental United States to all the people. And this is not just in the United States. This is a global planned attack and assault with technologies beyond most people's comprehension.
Everyone is is buying books and ammunition I mean, guns and ammunition. And they don't realize that the beam weapons, for example, on page 45, beam weapons increasingly prevalent. This is how they're going to attack. They talk also about on page 9. This is very interesting and horrifying.
Humans have taken over and vastly shortened evolution. They're going to direct evolution. They believe the they, the bankers, the global elites believe that they have accomplished immortality. And they're doing that again keeping in mind that this entire document is about robots, cyborgs, and humans. They've already mapped our brains.
We've just recently heard that they can, transfer a human brain into machinery. So whenever they tell us that this is a new scientific discovery, we know it's been, decades decades prior to us ever finding out about these things. And, they also talk about micro dust as a weapon. They say that this micron sized mechanized dust, which is distributed as an aerosol and inhaled into the lungs, the dust mechanically bores into the lung tissue and executes various pathological missions. They say it's a completely new type of warfare and it is legal.
It's legal. This is what they're going to do to all the humans on the face of this planet. It's all legal. And then they talk about how, the use of frequencies will be used in warfare. And we know, for example, the smart meters that are being deployed around the globe, The replacement of our electric meters, which will also and does include the replacement of all of our gas meters and our water meters as well and will be connected to our food supply when they collapse the currency and they issue energy, allowances and that will all be controlled through the metering system.
But they talk about the use of low frequencies, microwave frequencies, and they mention in this NASA document the US Army report. The US Army report is on our website, smartmetersmurder.com. It's about a 20 page, Army document that talks about the use of frequencies to target, the enemy. We're the enemy. And they say 100% of the human population will be affected by these frequencies.
Some will, be the canaries in the coal mine, which is a a term that they've been using as people have been dropping like flies. People are experiencing all kinds of health maladies. Generally it starts with ringing of the ears, heart palpitations, skin rashes, inability to sleep through the night. And what they're doing is they're jamming our immune systems with these frequencies.
Speaker 0: So how do the elite shield themselves from their own weapons?
Speaker 1: Well, that's a really good question, And some of the, information that we've come across is, of course, they have methods far ahead of anything that we have available to ourselves such as cancer cures. They don't get cancer. There's chip mechanisms that we understand can fend off certain frequency attacks. We also know that they're interested in transhumanism. So much of what they're doing globally, they're interested in.
And to what extent, they're affected by all of the chemtrails and all of the nano fibers that are being dropped, which is phase 1 of the first protocol. It all lines up. Everything lines up. You connect the dots. You see the NASA war document.
Not only does it talk about the, effects of frequencies and how it will be used, they acknowledge that it will interfere with our performance, that it will cause seizures. They acknowledge this in this document. It is no longer a debate about smart meters. We don't need any more scientists or doctors saying people are getting sick. This is the intention.
So we have to stop looking at for more verifiable proof that people are becoming sick. This is the goal. This is the absolute goal. It's incarceration. It is enslavement, and it is depopulation.
And it is massive mind control. The frequencies have multiple purposes.
Speaker 0: What do you think the solution is to all of this? This multi leveled attack that's been going on for a very long time.
Speaker 1: Well, I think the solution is that people need to become educated as rapidly as possible And there are documents that are, for example, the silent weapons quiet wars document. It's a 41 page document. It's, on our website. This lays out, it's an operations research and technical manual. This document was the 1954 built a 1954 Bilderberg policy at the 1st Bilderberg meeting.
And this laid out the strategy to control the human population. And again, I can't stress enough that everyone should read this because they talk about how, they they talk about that this document should not be released to the people because it is a declaration of war.
Speaker 2: You can't keep fighting fires. You have to go after the arsonist, and that's what you're pointing out is the people that are responsible. And everything we see out there, what they're spraying and and why are they spraying. Nobody's talking about the conspiracy itself. This is a war against the people and this you've got a hold of those specific people and that's why that's valuable.
They're killing us.
Speaker 1: That's exactly right. And this is their this is their war plan. This is the war plan. So we have to go to the war plan. This is only 41 pages.
You take out the diagrams and you've got 36 pages and it's not hard to read. They say that it's, the silent weapon, technology has evolved from operations research, a strategic and tactical developed under the military management in England during World War 2. The original purpose of this research was to study strategic and tactical problems of air and land defense with objective effectiveness used in initiated material, military resources against foreign enemies. And they go on to talk about how, they came across technologies that, they had oh, in 1952 the grant the grant period terminated and the high level meeting of the elite was held to determine the next phase of the social operations research. The Harvard product, project had been very fruitful as is borne out by the publication of some of the results in 1953, suggesting the feasibility of economic engineering studies of structure of the American economy.
And, they talk about how it was engineered in the last half of the 1940s. The new quiet war machine stood so to speak in sparkling gold plated hardware on the showroom floor by 1954. So this document talks about a combination of irresistible attacks upon humanity and how they will control humanity. Politically, they talk about how they set up the, political system right and left, so that we would feel, our grievances were aired and our frustrations could, come out, but the bankers were behind everyone who was elected and they laugh at us. They laugh at us.
The very, very last, and I'll go to this right now because we'll come back to the document itself, but the very last statement in this document it says, factor 6, cattle. Those who will not use their brains are no better off than those who have no brains And so this mindless school of jellyfish, father, mother, son, and daughter become useful beasts of burden or trainers of the same. So what they say in this document is they will dole out poisonous foods. It's not what we need, but it's what we want. And those that decide to eat these foods will have the consequences of that.
They tell us, how they set up all the social engineering, how they devise the family, how they crumble the family, how they set up the war machine, how they influence thinking, in the family unit to allow the family to give up their children to war for a rich man's father. It's it's a document that discusses, the artificial womb. They believe that people need to feel protected and that the elites are going to serve as the womb for protection of the people. That they'll have a place to take cover and hide from the reality of life because we just are not capable of managing the reality of life. So they will set up, that artificial womb.
It says, the objective of these artificial wounds is to provide a stable environment for both stable and unstable activity, to provide a shelter for the evolutionary process of growth and maturity. Survival, to provide security for freedom and to provide defensive protection for offensive activity. And they say that from the time a person leaves its mother's its mother's womb, in every effort, every its every effort is directed towards building, maintaining, and withdrawing into artificial wombs. Various sorts of substitute protective devices or shells. So they set themselves up to protect us, to keep us crippled, to numb us down with foods so that our pineal gland is interfered with.
We're never able to reach our higher consciousness, and right now, the massive fluoridation across the United States is to collapse the ability for us to think. They're shutting us down right now.
Speaker 2: They take your baby and make it Rosemary's baby.
Speaker 1: That's exactly right right.
Speaker 0: It's very similar to the matrix, which was based on a DARPA document. I mean, it's it is similar, isn't it? There it's it's problem, reaction, solution, the same way they always operate. So I guess the best thing to do is wake everyone up and hope that a grassroots movement can change it. Do you think revolution would be necessary at some point or could it change without that?
What do you think?
Speaker 1: Well, I think we need a revelation, not a revolution. A revolution would only bring in martial law in in the opinion of what we are looking at, would bring in martial law. It would also, allow people to be targeted with the weaponry that they cannot wait to roll out on us. You add the drones, you add the micro dust, you add in the beam weapons that they tell us they have. They also have a blast wave accelerator.
And when you look at the population of the United States, the majority of the population lives along the coastlines. And the blast wave accelerator was a, tidal wave, invention that the United States dreamt up with the Soviet Union back in the forties. Actually, it was going to be used in World War 2 instead of the bombs, but they decided to use the bombs instead. And the blast wave accelerator, exploits the methane deposits on the seabed and causes a fingerprintless, plumeless, tidal wave on low lying areas around the perimeter of any country that they just
Speaker 2: got your weaponized gestapo meter that keeps track of every house and every movement and every bit of energy that you're already doing and can report back to whoever is observing. So we're virtually in a concentration camp right now. In the meantime, the food supplies are being reduced. As you mentioned in your other interview, how the dams are being taken out, the food. I mean, it's so obvious that the federal government coming in and wanting your child even at earlier and earlier ages, every place, everywhere, and it's based on the foundation of climate change, which you mentioned you might wanna get into that, and your Iron Mountain.
Speaker 1: True. All the documents, the Iron Mountain document, even the NASA war document talks about, there are too many people using too much stuff, and the earth cannot support this. And they've come up, with the fear based, scientific fraudulent information that people are now accepting. They're rewriting history and they're rewriting science with the idea that, people are using too much, resources. We have to reduce c o two and reduce our greenhouse gas emissions.
And that is flying through every city across the world right now. It's written into all local government, documents. And cities now are, at well, California, for example, with the, carb initiative where we have to actually pay for the air we breathe and we're taxed, for the air. It's like the fiat money. We've accepted, false backed money, which they tell us in the iron document or in the silent weapons document.
One of the reasons that they send, our men and women off to war is to reduce the population because they have stolen from them. They've taken real labor service in exchange for illegitimate false fiat money. So they have to eliminate the creditors. That's another aspect of war is to reduce the creditors. But, it's all based on the false pollution that is not false.
They've created the pollution. When you look at the Iron Mountain document, you will see the methods in which they were going to create pollution. They even say that they will deforest us, and they're doing that with the chemtrail, the secret chemtrail or geoengineering program or weather modification. Actually, that program has multiple layers. Not only does it, increase weather events, we've just experienced some horrific events here in the United States with massive tornadoes that, just destroyed a number of cities, in Oklahoma, were were being hit globally.
They're hitting our food supply. It does reduce our food supply. It will increase the cost of our food. It's changing the pH in the soil, which will then fit to the prescribed Monsanto mega corporation food takeover of the globe. That is the intention of Monsanto is global food domination.
They have the seeds. The seeds will grow in the polluted soil that they are creating. This is all by design. So what do we do about this? You asked.
We first must become educated. And I would say that the quickest way for people to become educated is look at these very simple source documents. Look at the Quiet Weapons silent war document. Look at the Iron Mountain document and the New World Order exposed 1969, they're all on our website, stop the crime dot net. Of all the research we have done, if you just get those basic documents understood, if everyone understands the fraud, then we will be able to eliminate this.
We don't have to go on with this fraud. We do not. And people keep saying, Well, there's more of us than them. Well, that may be true. But sadly, now, there are technologies that are so, unbelievable that people won't even realize what hit them.
And that is the strategy of the future wars and the wars that we're facing in our country. But I would say everyone needs to look at the NASA document. You need to move from the illusion, the non reality that you are living in. You need to move into a new reality formed by the the truth that these documents convey. So that then from those realities, then you can look at solutions.
You can't shoot from the hip and look for solutions if you have not learned who's doing this to us, how they're doing this to us, and the documents that tell us how they are doing this to us.
Speaker 2: Like the Truman Show, which was designed to create a false reality for entertainment, the false reality we have now is designed to kill us. This is this is a war against the people. This is why that tabloid came out prepared to die, And they're doing it in so many deliberate ways in which those documents show that it's been in the works for a long time. And you not only see the individuals which can be kind of identified with the Bilderbergers, the trilats and skull and bones, They are in the saddle. They are the ones determining policy, the scientific advisor to the president of the John P.
Holdren in charge of the chemtrails. We have MITRE with the former head of the CIA directing all these branches of government. We've got guys like Leon Panetta, which is the head of the CIA and the Department of Defense, moving our armies over to NATO and moving without a constitution. This is a direct war against us. And we see people dying like flies now.
And like you said, it doesn't have fingerprints on it because because of the methods that they're using, but it's as real as people getting strokes and cancer and autism and Alzheimer's. It's so clear. I mean, the the the stats of mathematics prove the point. And so they have to know people have to know what's going on, to strategize, to fight it, and they can because the only way they're getting away with this is by the lies. And if you if you sort of come to the the mass media, the 3 networks, and the 2 wire services, you you're never gonna get out of it.
Speaker 1: Well, it actually says in the document, in the NASA war document, that they will use, mass media propaganda. That is, prevalent.
Speaker 0: Syndrome? Is that
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's one of the things that they call it. But they they're literally going through this document. Oh, they're going to also use explosive dust opportunities. They talk about, how, oh, the dust will infiltrate deeply into buried and other such targets.
They're saying in here too if if you move they can see you and you're dead. So the technology oh, sensors in everything. There is an amazing mission statement that I found on PSI, technology out of the Carnegie Mellon Institute. And the miss mission statement stated that they were changing the global infrastructure to that of, computers and technology, and that would include our entire structure, not only utilities, but civil, government, policies. And what is also very interesting, we went to, Al Gore's recent book review.
He wrote a book called The Future. And he talks about how, artificial intelligence is going to take over and that we're going to see changes within the United States that have not been seen in 500 years. And he talks about how, it's just not efficient to continue with humans. The same thing. These all tie in.
They all tie in. We have a think tank that is plotting and scheming against humanity because they believe that, it's too frail. And they also talk about, let me pause for a second here. Oh, they talk about the US brain project and it begun in the 90s. They say that it was funded by 16 organizations across 5 agencies.
NIH which of course is the National Health Institute, the Department of Defense, NASA and the Department of Energy. And, they talk about how, they have over 10,000 individual presentations at annual meetings for the Society For Neuroscience. And essentially they have redesigned humanity. And there is a fascinating, life story of a a 4th generation clone called Michael Prince. And that is on our website under the NASA document link and I urge everybody to listen to this, this, interview with Michael Prince.
He was killed in 2011, and he is a 4th generation clone. The levels of technology, the length of time that they've had technologies are unbelievable. What they also say in the Iron Mountain documentary is that they will control the educational system, that, they will, replace the education system with computers. They're saying that in, the NASA document too. Everything will be telecommuting, teleshopping, teleentertainment, teletravel, teleeducation.
This way, they can rewrite history. Everything will be on Kindle, and it'll be very easy to change books, to change the language. Recently, I was listening to a weather report. And the reporter said, it will be sunny tomorrow. But I'm calling sunshine now a soft sunshine because the sun doesn't shine like it used to.
I mean, that is what I'm saying. The reporter didn't say that. But the reporter now is saying a soft sunshine. They're rewriting our definition of what a sunny day is supposed to look like because we're under the constant vellum of this secret nonexistent, atmospheric poisoning of our skies. So they're rewriting our vocabulary.
They're rewriting everything about us. And they're keeping us so sick, from the fluoride, from the aspartame in the food, all of the dyes and chemicals on everything. I mean, even the receipts that we get from filling our cars with gas are poisonous. We shouldn't be touching them. And so we need to navigate.
I I say that life on a daily basis is like trying to walk through a landmine field. And if you get to the other side at the end of the day, you've made good choices because they've certainly put in place landmines in our lives.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's hard to avoid really. I mean
Speaker 1: The impact that it's having on our lives that we should be sitting here right now having this conversation because of what has been orchestrated against us. Our futures are being determined for us. Our life spans are being decided upon.
Speaker 0: It's fascinating information. So the best way to get access to all this is stop the crime dot net?
Speaker 1: Stop the crime dot net. It links to our other websites as well which is, smartmetersmurder.com. We have invaluable YouTube videos up on smartmetersmurder.com. There's a series done by Barry, b a r r I e, Trower, t r o w e r, who is a scientist out of the UK and, talks about the weaponization of frequencies as it relates specifically to the wireless. And in particular, the, vast deployment throughout America and other countries as well of the cell phone towers.
They're erupting everywhere. And they're disguising them as trees. They're disguising them in church steeples. Even when you drive through the desert, they're disguised into yuccas. And that is a cell phone tower.
They're also this is very interesting. They're putting them in in mobile oil signs in gas stations, so you don't even see them. Now, when you look, if you're really aware of spotting cell phone towers, my grandchildren can spot them a mile away. But you can go to shopping centers where they have landscaping and the up lights amongst the landscaping. And you'll see many up light standards that are disguised cellphone towers.
And you don't think of it. You're just thinking that it's lights within the parking lot and they're actual cell phone towers.
Speaker 0: And they're in church steeples as well, aren't they? Steeples.
Speaker 1: Yes, they are. And they're paying, schools to, put them on their campuses. Right now, there's a newly discovered cancer cluster at San Diego State University, and there have been a number of students and faculty that have have gotten brain tumors. So we are in a takedown of frequencies admitted by this document. We have the proof.
We have the military, the agencies that admit to this. We don't need to prove the deaths on the campuses near towers because it says towers will be used in this in on page 98. It says that towers will be used, to emit frequencies. So again, this is their document. This is what they tell us on page 98.
A typical scenario, takedown of the US by 10 people $10,000,000 Binary biologicals imported vitamins and clothing, the food supply will be poisoned, terror attacks with, vaccines and with viruses. They talk about, our railroads will be attacked, selective anti personnel with, radiation frequencies, microwaves from the towers. The water supply will be contaminated, via intercontinental unmanned vehicles accompanied by serious sci war, and that's the CNN syndrome. So they're telling us here how easy it would be to take down the United States with these new technologies. We've got to expose this.
Speaker 0: Thanks so much for all this information, Deborah Tavares. And we will check out your website and try
@_pblanknews - Point Blank News
White House Holds First Press Briefing (Full Video) https://t.co/tUPo0XSEbe
Video Transcript AI Summary
Good afternoon, everyone. It's great to see you all. President Trump is back, and the Golden Age of America has begun. The Senate has confirmed five cabinet nominees, and President Trump is fulfilling his campaign promises with over 300 executive actions. He declared a national emergency at the southern border, ended catch and release, and is committed to deporting illegal immigrants, including violent criminals.
On the economic front, Trump is working to lower costs for families and has ordered a review of federal spending to eliminate wasteful programs. He emphasizes transparency and accessibility, welcoming new media voices to the White House. President Trump is focused on restoring American dominance in AI and ensuring that taxpayer dollars are spent wisely. He remains committed to addressing inflation and supporting American families. Thank you, and I look forward to your questions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Afternoon, everybody. Good afternoon. How are we? Good. Good to see all of you.
It's an honor to be here with all of you. A lot of familiar faces in the room, a lot of new faces, and President Trump is back, and the Golden Age of America has most definitely begun. The Senate has already confirmed 5 of President Trump's exceptional cabinet nominees, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, homeland security secretary, Kristi Noem, and treasury secretary, Scott Bessin. It is imperative that the senate continues to confirm the remainder of the president's well qualified nominees as quickly as possible. As you have seen during the past week, president Trump is hard at work fulfilling the promises that he made to the American people on the campaign trail.
Since taking the oath of office, president Trump has taken more than 300 executive actions, secured nearly $1,000,000,000,000 in US investments, deported illegal alien rapists, gang members, and suspected terrorists from our homeland, and restored common sense to the federal government. I wanna take a moment to go through some of these extraordinary actions. On day 1, president Trump declared a national emergency at our southern border to end the 4 year long invasion of illegal aliens under the previous administration. Additionally, President Trump signed an executive order to end catch and release and finish construction of his effective border wall. By using every lever of his federal power, President Trump has sent a loud and clear message to the entire world.
America will no longer tolerate illegal immigration, and this president expects that every nation on this planet will cooperate with the repatriation of their citizens. As proven by this weekend, when President Trump swiftly directed his team to issue harsh and effective sanctions and tariffs on the Colombian government, upon hearing, they were denied a US military aircraft full of their own citizens who were deported by this administration. Within hours, the Colombian government agreed to all of president Trump's demands, proving America is once again respected on the world stage. So to foreign nationals who are thinking about trying to illegally enter the United States, think again. Under this president, you will be detained and you will be deported.
Every day, Americans are safer because of the violent criminals that president Trump's administration is removing from our communities. On January 23rd, ICE New York arrested a Turkish national for entry without inspection who is a known or suspected terrorist. On January 23rd, ICE San Francisco arrested a citizen of Mexico unlawfully present in the United States who has been convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a child aged 14 years or younger. Ice Saint Paul has arrested a citizen of Honduras who was convicted of 4th degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor. Ice Buffalo arrested a citizen of Ecuador who has been convicted of rape.
Ice Boston arrested a citizen of the Dominican Republic who has a criminal conviction for second degree murder. This criminal was convicted of murder for beating his pregnant wife to death in front of her 5 year old son. And ICE Saint Paul also arrested a citizen of Mexico who was convicted of possessing pornographic material of a minor on a work computer. These are the heinous individuals that this administration is removing from American communities every single day into the brave state and local law enforcement officers, CBP, and ICE agents who are helping in the facilitation of this deportation operation. President Trump has your back and he is grateful for your hard work.
On the economic front, president Trump took immediate action to lower cost for families who are suffering from 4 long years of the Biden administration's destructive and inflationary policies. President Trump ordered the heads of all executive departments and agencies to help deliver emergency price relief to the American people, untangle our economy from Biden's regulatory constraints, and end the reckless war on American energy. President Trump also signed sweeping executive orders to end the weaponization of government and restore common sense to the federal bureaucracy. He directed all federal agencies to terminate illegal diversity, equity, and inclusion programs to help return America to a merit based society. President Trump also signed an executive order declaring it is now the policy of the federal government that there are only 2 sexes, male and female.
Sanity has been restored. Before I take your questions, I would like to point out to all of you once again have access to the most transparent and accessible president in American history. There has never been a president who communicates with the American people and the American press corps as openly and authentically as the 45th and now 47th president of the United States. This past week, president Trump has held multiple news conferences, gaggled on Air Force 1 multiple times, and sat down for a 2 part interview on Fox News, which aired last week. As Politico summed it up best, Trump is everywhere again.
And that's because president Trump has a great story to tell about the legendary American revival that is well underway. And in keeping with this revolutionary media approach that president Trump deployed during the campaign, the Trump White House will speak to all media outlets and personalities, not just the legacy media who are seated in this room. Because according according to recent polling from Gallup, Americans' trust in mass media has fallen to a record low. Millions of Americans, especially young people, have turned from traditional television outlets and newspapers to consume their news from podcasts, blogs, social media, and other independent outlets. It's essential to our team that we share president Trump's message everywhere and adapt this White House to the new media landscape in 2025.
To do this, I'm excited to announce the following changes will be made to this historic James s Brady Briefing Room where mister Brady's legacy will endure. This White House believes strongly in the First Amendment, so it's why our team will work diligently to restore the press passes of the 440 journalists whose passes were wrongly revoked by the previous administration. We're also opening up this briefing room to new media voices who produce news related content and whose outlet is not already represented by one of the seats in this room. We welcome independent journalists, podcasters, social media influencers, and content creators to apply for credentials to cover this White House. And you can apply now on our new website, white house dot gov /newmedia.
Starting today, this seat in the front of the room, which is usually occupied by the press secretary staff, will be called the new media seat. My team will review the applications and give credentials to new media applicants who meet our criteria and pass United States Secret Service requirements to enter the White House complex. So in light of these announcements, our first questions for today's briefing will go to these new media members whose outlets, despite being some of the most viewed news websites in the country, have not been given seats in this room. And before I turn to questions, I do have news directly from the President of the United States that was just shared with me in Trump directly, an update on the New Jersey drones. After research and study, the drones that were flying over New Jersey in large numbers were authorized to be flown by the FAA for research and various other reasons.
Many of these drones were also hobbyist, recreational, and private individuals that enjoy flying drones. In meantime in the in time, it got worse due to curiosity. This was not the enemy. A statement from the president of the United States to start this briefing with some news. And with that, I will turn it over to questions, and we will begin with our new media members Mike Allen from Axios, Matt Boyle from Breitbart.
He gaggled for I think the 3rd or 4th time, throughout the weekend with members of the travelling press corps. The president said that he believes that this is a wake up call to the American AI industry. The last administration sat on their hands and allowed China to rapidly develop this AI program. And so President Trump believes in restoring American AI dominance, And that's why he took very strong executive action this past week, to sign executive orders to roll back some of the honors regulations on the AI industry. And president Trump has also proudly appointed the first, AI and crypto czar at this White House, David Sachs, whom I spoke with yesterday, very knowledgeable on this subject, and his team is here working every single day to ensure American AI dominance.
As for the national security implications, I spoke with NSC this morning. They are looking into what those may be, and when I have an update, I will share it you, Mike.
Speaker 1: Caroline, you say restore US dominance. Is there a fear that the US either is fallen or has fallen behind? And how would the president make sure US stays ahead?
Speaker 0: No. The president is confident that we will restore American dominance in AI.
Speaker 2: So, Caroline, first of all, thank you to you and president Trump for actually giving voices, to new media outlets, that represent millions and millions of Americans. The thing I would add the I I've got a 2 part question for you. The first is, is just can you expand upon what steps, the White House is going to take, to bring more voices, not less, which is what our founder, Andrew Breitbart, believed in, into this room where they, rightfully belong.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Absolutely. And as I said in my opening statement, Matt, it is a priority of this White House to honor the First Amendment. And it is a fact that Americans are consuming their news media from various different platforms, especially young people. And as the youngest press secretary in history, thanks to President Trump, I take great pride in opening up this room, to new media voices to share the president's message with as many Americans as possible.
In doing so, number 1, we will ensure that outlets like yours, Axios and Breitbart, which are widely respected and viewed outlets, have an actual seat in this room every day. We also, again, encourage anybody in this country, whether you are a TikTok content creator, a blogger, a podcaster, if you are producing legitimate news content, no matter the medium, you will be allowed to apply for press credentials to this White House. And as I said earlier, our new, media website is, white house dot gov slash new media. And so we encourage people to apply. Again, as long as you are, creating news related content of the day and, you're a legitimate independent journalist, you're welcome to cover this White House.
Speaker 2: And secondly, Caroline, you said you you laid out several of the actions that president Trump has taken. Obviously, it's stark contrast in the previous administration, a breakneck speed from president Trump. Can we expect that pace to continue as the hunt the, you know, the first 100 days moves along here and beyond that?
Speaker 0: Absolutely. There's no doubt president Trump has always been the hardest working man in politics. I think that's been proven, over the past week. This president has again signed more than 300 executive orders. He's taken historic action.
I gaggle the board Air Force 1 to mark the first 100 days of this administration 4 PM last Friday. Our first 100 hours rather, and this president did more in the first 100 hours than the previous president did in the first 100 days. So, president Trump, I think you can all expect, to for him to continue to work at this breakneck speed. So I hope you're all ready to work very hard. I know that we are.
Zeke Miller.
Speaker 3: Thanks, Caroline. A question that we've asked, your predecessors, of both parties in this job. When you're up here in this briefing room speaking to the American public, do you view yourself and your role as speaking on advocating on behalf of the president or providing the unvarnished truth that is, you know, not to lie, not to obfuscate to the American people?
Speaker 0: I commit to telling the truth from this podium every single day. I commit to speaking on behalf of the president of the United States that is my job and I will say it's very easy to speak truth from this podium when you have a president- who is implementing policies that are wildly popular with the American people and that's exactly what this administration is doing it's correcting the lies and the wrongs of the correcting the lies and the wrongs of the past 4 years. Many of the lies that have been told to your faces in this very briefing room. I will not do that. But since you brought up truth seek I would like to point out, while I vow to provide the truth from this podium, we ask that all of you in this room hold yourselves to that same standard.
We know for a fact there have been lies that have been pushed by many legacy media outlets in this country about this president, about his family, and we will not accept that. We will call you out when we feel that your, reporting is wrong or there is misinformation about this White House. So, yes, I will hold myself to the truth, and I expect everyone in this room to do the same.
Speaker 3: And, Carol, I just had a substantive question. Yesterday, the White House Office and management budget directed across the board, freeze, the the some exceptions for individual assistance, we understand, the federal grants. It's caused a lot of confusion around the country, head start providers among providers, services to homeless veterans, you know, Medicaid provider states saying they're having trouble accessing the portal. Could you help us clear up some confusion? Give some certainty to folks.
And also, is that uncertainty how does that uncertainty service the president's voters?
Speaker 0: Well, I think there's only uncertainty in this room amongst the media. There's no uncertainty in this building. So let me provide the certainty and the clarity that all of you need. This is not a blanket pause on federal assistance in grant programs from the Trump administration. Individual assistance that includes I'm not naming everything that's included, but just to give you a few examples.
Social security benefits Medicare benefits- food stamps welfare benefits assistance that is going directly to individuals will not be impacted by this pause and I wanna make that very clear to any Americans who are watching at home who may be a little bit confused about some of the media reporting. This administration, if you are receiving individual assistance from the federal government, you will still continue to receive that. However, it is the responsibility of this president and this administration to be good stewards of taxpayer dollars. That is something that president Trump campaigned on. That's why he has launched Doge, the Department of Government Efficiency, who is working alongside OMB.
And that's why OMB sent out this memo last night because the president signed an executive order directing OMB to do just this. And the reason for this is to ensure that every penny that is going out the door is not conflicting with the executive orders and actions that this president has taken. So what does this pause mean? It means no more funding for illegal DEI programs. It means no more funding for the green new scam that has cost American taxpayers tens of 1,000,000,000 of dollars.
It means no more funding for transgenderism and wokeness across our federal bureaucracy and agencies. No more funding for Green New Deal social engineering policies. Again, people who are, receiving individual assistance assistance, you will continue to receive that. And President Trump is looking out for you by issuing this pause, because he is being good steward of your taxpayer dollars.
Speaker 4: Thanks, Caroline. Sure. How long is this pause going to last, and how is the Trump administration recommending that organizations that rely on federal funding make payroll pay their rent in the meantime?
Speaker 0: It is a temporary pause and the Office of Management and Budget is reviewing, the federal funding that has been going out the door. Again, not for individual assistance, but for all of these other programs, that I mentioned. I also spoke with the, incoming director of OMB this morning, and he told me to tell all of you that, the line to his office is open for other federal government agencies across the board, and if they feel that programs are necessary and in line with the president's agenda then the Office of Management and Budget will review those policies. I think this is a very responsible measure. Again, the past 4 years we've
Speaker 5: seen the Biden administration spend money like drunken sailors. It's a big reason
Speaker 0: we've had an inflation crisis. Reason we've had an inflation crisis in this country, and it's incumbent upon this administration to make sure, again, that every penny is being accounted for honestly.
Speaker 4: Why oppose this pause with so little notice? Why not give organizations more time to plan for the fact that they are about to lose, in some cases, really crucial federal funding? There was At least for for a period
Speaker 0: of time. There was notice. It was the executive order that the president signed. There's also a freeze on hiring as you know of a regulatory freeze and there's also a freeze on foreign aid. And this is, again, incredibly important to ensure that this administration is, taking into consideration how hard the American people are working, and their tax dollars actually matter to this administration.
You know, just during this pause, Doge and OMB have actually found that there was $37,000,000 that was about to go out the door to the World Health Organization, which is an organization as you all know that President Trump with the swipe of his pen in that executive order, is no longer wants the United States to be a part of. So that wouldn't be in line with the President's agenda. DOJ and OMB also found that there was about to be 50,000,000 taxpayer dollars that went out the door to fund condoms in Gaza. That is a preposterous waste of taxpayer money. So that's what this pause is focused on, being good stewards of tax dollars.
And so this
Speaker 4: doesn't affect wheels on wheels for head start or disaster aid.
Speaker 0: Again, it does not affect individual assistance that's going to Americans. To follow-up on Nancy,
Speaker 6: do you think there'll be a
Speaker 4: list of who is affected and how much money
Speaker 6: is affected? How how will these contractors and organizations know if they are actually being having their funding frozen? And then secondly, if you're willing, can you just clarify, is the end goal of this to essentially challenge Congress or to to prove that the president can withhold federal funding? Is in other words, is this an attempt to pick a fight
Speaker 0: to prove that he can do this? No. Absolutely not. As it says right here in the memo, which I have, and I'd encourage all of you to read it, it says the American people elected President Trump to be the president of the United States and gave him a mandate to increase the impact of every federal dollar. This memo requires federal agencies to identify and review all federal financial assistance programs in supporting activities consistent with the president's policies and requirements.
The American people gave president Trump an overwhelming mandate on November 5th, and he's just trying to ensure that the tax money going out the door in this very bankrupt city actually aligns with the will and the priorities of the American people. So will the alliance line?
Speaker 7: Yes. Welcome. You look great. You're doing a great job. You talked about transparency.
And some of us in this room know how just transparent president Trump has been the last 5 or 6 years. I think you'll do the same. My question is, do you think this latest incident with the president of Colombia is indicative of the global, powerful respect they have for president Trump moving forward, not only to engage in in economic diplomacy with these countries but also world peace?
Speaker 0: Absolutely. I'll echo the answer that the president gave on Air Force 1 last night when he was asked a very similar question by one of your colleagues in the media. This signifies peace through strength is back, and this president will not tolerate illegal immigration into America's interior. And he expects every nation on this planet again to cooperate with the repatriation of their citizens who illegally, entered into our country and broke America's laws won't be tolerated. And as you saw, the Colombian government, quickly folded and agreed to all of President Trump's demands.
Flights are underway once again.
Speaker 5: Fairly. Fairly.
Speaker 8: Okay. 2 questions on deportations if I may. President Trump has said on the campaign trail that he would deport pro Hamas students who are here on visas. And on his first day in office, he sent an executive order that said, quote, the US must ensure that admitted aliens and aliens otherwise already present in the US do not bear hostile attitudes towards the citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles. So should we take this executive order as Trump think he would be open to deporting those students who are here on visas but, you know, hold pro Hamas sympathies?
Speaker 0: The president is open to deporting individuals who have broken our nation's immigration laws. So if they are here illegally, then certainly he is open to deporting them. And that's what this administration is hard at work at doing. We receive, data from DHS and from ICE every single day. From what we hear on the ground, ICE agents are feeling incredibly empowered right now because they actually have a leader in this building who is supporting them in doing their jobs that they were hired to do which is to detain arrest and deport illegal criminals who have invaded our nation's borders over the past 4 years that's what the president is committed to seeing here
Speaker 9: just following up on the question on immigration first. President Trump during the course of the campaign in 2024 said the following about illegal, immigration. He said, they're going back home where they belong, and we start with the criminals. There are many, many criminals. NBC News has learned that ICE arrested 179 undocumented immigrants on Sunday, but nearly half of them, 566 of the migrants, appear to have no prior criminal record besides entering the country illegally.
Is the president still focused exclusive, which is a civil crime, not a not a not a it's not criminal?
Speaker 5: It's a
Speaker 0: federal crime.
Speaker 9: It's a so I'm asking, though. He said he was gonna focus on those violent offenders first. So is violent offenders no longer the predicate for these people to be deported?
Speaker 0: The president has said countless times on the campaign trail. I've been with him at the rallies. I know you've been there covering them too, Peter, that he is focused on launching the largest mass deportation operation in American history of illegal criminals. And if you are an individual, a foreign national, who illegally enters the United States of America, you are by definition a criminal. And so therefore you are subject to deportation.
Speaker 9: I apologize for interrupting. So to be clear, it's not a violent criminals do not receive precedence in terms of the deportations taking place.
Speaker 0: The president has also said 2 things can be true at the same time. We wanna deport illegal criminals, illegal immigrants from this country, but the president has said that, of course, the illegal, criminal drug dealers, the rapists, the murderers, the individuals who have committed heinous acts on the interior of our country and who have terrorized law abiding American citizens, absolutely, those should be the priority of ICE, but that doesn't mean that the other illegal criminals who entered our nation's borders are off the table.
Speaker 9: Understood. And let me ask you a separate question about the confusion that still exists across the country right now as it relates to the the freeze or pause as it's described. President Trump, of course, ran one of the key policy items was that he was gonna lower prices, lower the cost of everything from groceries, as he often said. But in many of the cases, it would seem that some of these moves could raise prices for real Americans on everything from low income heating, that program, childcare programs. Well, nothing that the president's doing here in terms of the freeze in these programs raise prices on ordinary Americans?
Speaker 0: What particular actions are you referring to that would I'm referring to
Speaker 9: LHEAP right now. That's the low income heating program, for example. We can talk about there's no clarity, so I could refer to a lot of them. We don't know what they are specifically. Can you tell us that LHEAP that LIHEAP is not one of those affected?
Speaker 0: So you're asking a hypothetical based on programs that you can't even identify. I just identified that. What I can tell you Well,
Speaker 9: just be just be clear. Since you guys haven't identified, let's do it together just for Americans at home. Medicaid, is that affected?
Speaker 0: I gave you a list of examples, Social Security, Medicare, welfare benefits food stamps that will not be impacted by this federal pause I can get you the full list after this briefing from the office of management budget but I do want to address the cost cutting- because that's certainly very important- and and cutting the cost of living in this country. President Trump has taken historic action over the past week to do that. He actually signed a memorandum to deliver emergency price relief for American families, which took a number of actions. I can walk you through those. He also repealed, many honors Biden administration regulations.
We know over the past 4 years, American households has been essentially taxed $55,000 in regulations from the previous administration. President Trump with the swipe of his pen rescinded those, which will ultimately put more money back in the pockets of the American people. So deregulation is a big deal. And then when it comes to energy, I mean, the president signed an executive order to declare a national energy emergency here at home, which is going to make America energy dominant. We know that energy is one of the number one drivers of inflation, and so that's why the president wants to increase our energy supply to bring down cost for Americans.
The Trump energy boom is incoming, and Americans can expect that.
Speaker 9: Please shut
Speaker 5: that off. Thank you. Caroline, I think
Speaker 6: some of the confusion I think may be here with with this pause on federal funding. You've made it clear that you're not stopping funds that go directly to individuals, but there certainly are lots of organizations that receive funding and then may pass along a benefit. Meals on Wheels for 1. They provide meals for over 2,200,000 seniors. What is the president's message to Americans out there, many of whom supported him and voted for him, who are concerned that this is going to impact them directly even if, as you said, the funding isn't coming directly to their I
Speaker 0: have now been asked and answered this question four times. To individuals at home who receive direct assistance from the federal government, you will not be impacted by this federal freeze. In fact, OMB just sent out a memo to Capitol Hill with Q and A to to clarify some of the questions and the answers that all of you are at are asking me right now again direct assistance will not be impacted I've been asked and answered about this OMB memo There's many other topics of the day. Jackie Heiner. Direct assistance, Caroline.
Speaker 6: It's going to another organization and then trickling down.
Speaker 0: Direct assistance that is in the hands of the American people will not be impacted. Again, as I said to Peter, we will continue to provide that list as it, comes to fruition. But OMB right now is focused on analyzing the federal government's spending, which is exactly what the American people elected president Trump
Speaker 5: to do.
Speaker 6: And one question to
Speaker 8: the American American immigration.
Speaker 6: Of the 35100 arrests ICE has made so far since president Trump came back into office, can you just tell us the numbers? How many have a criminal record versus those who are just in the country illegally?
Speaker 0: All of them. Because they illegally broke our nation's laws, and therefore, they are criminals as far as this administration goes. I know the last administration didn't see it that way, so it's a big culture shift in our nation to view someone who breaks our immigration laws as a criminal, but that's exactly what they are. And welcome to the brief. If they broke our nation's laws, yes.
They are criminal.
Speaker 10: Yes. Thank you. On, stripping security details for figures like John Bolton, Pompeo, Brian Hook. Senator Tom Cotton said that he's seen the intelligence and the threat from Iran is real for anyone who played a role in Soleimani strike. He voiced concern it wouldn't just impact those individuals but potentially their family, innocent bystanders, friends, anyone who's near them when they're out in public.
Is the president open to reconsidering his decision?
Speaker 0: The president was asked and answered this yesterday, and he was firm in his decision despite some of the comments that you had referenced. And he's made it very clear that he does not believe American taxpayers should fund security details for individuals who have served in the government for the rest of their lives. And there's nothing stopping these individuals that you mentioned from, obtaining private security. That's where the president stands on it. I have no updates on that.
Speaker 10: Is there any concern that this decision might jeopardize the administration's ability to hire the best advisers for these kinds of positions in the future?
Speaker 0: No. In fact, I've talked to the presidential personnel office who has told me directly that there is such an influx of resumes for this administration that it's incredibly overwhelming. There is no lack of talent for the Trump administration. Reagan And
Speaker 11: Ron, would he take any responsibility
Speaker 10: if anything happened to these people? Would he feel at all that his decision was a factor in that?
Speaker 0: The president was asked and answered this yesterday.
Speaker 10: I'd prefer you to
Speaker 5: respond.
Speaker 0: Thank you
Speaker 9: very much.
Speaker 0: Reagan, since you're in the back row, I hear you. The back row hasn't gotten that much attention in the last 4 years. So I'm happy to answer
Speaker 11: your question. I can project. Since intend to permanently cut off funding to NGOs that are bringing illegal foreign nationals to the country such as Catholic Charities?
Speaker 0: I am actually quite certain that the president signed an executive order that did just that, and I can point you to that.
Speaker 11: One more, Caroline. President Trump issued an executive order on increased vetting for refugees in visa applications. Right. Part of that order was considering an outbreak ban for countries that have deficient screening processes. Has the president considered yet which countries might fall into this category or countries like Afghanistan or Syria under consideration for a full ban?
Speaker 0: Yeah. So the president signed an executive order to streamline the vetting for visa applicants and for, illegal immigrants in this country who are coming, of course, from other nations. It also directed the secretary of state to review the process and make sure that other countries around the world are being completely transparent with our nation, and the individuals that they are sending here. And so the secretary of state has been directed to, report back to the president. I haven't seen that report yet.
We've only been here for
Speaker 6: a few days.
Speaker 11: Thank you. One on the freeze in federal funding. Who advised the president on the legality, of telling government agencies that they don't have to spend money that was already appropriated by Congress?
Speaker 0: Well, as the OMB memo states, this is certainly within the confines of the law. So, White House Counsel's office believes that, this is within the past president's power to do it, and therefore he's doing it.
Speaker 11: Okay. So they disagree with lawmakers who say
Speaker 0: that they don't have the power to to freeze this punishment. Point you to the language in the memo that clearly states this is within the law. And all that happened
Speaker 11: on Friday night, the the administration fired several inspectors general without giving Congress the 30 day legally required notification that they were being fired. I think only 2 were left at DOJ DHS and the DOJ. And then yesterday, we saw several prosecutors, I believe 12, fired from the justice department who worked on the investigations into the president. As you know, they are career prosecutors. Therefore, they are afforded civil service protections.
How is the administration deciding which laws to follow and which ones to ignore?
Speaker 0: So it is the belief of this White House and the White House Counsel's Office that the president was within his executive authority, to do that. He is the executive of the executive branch and therefore he has the power to fire anyone within the executive branch, that he wishes to. There's also a case that went before the Supreme Court in 2020 Scala Law LLC versus the customs the, Bureau protection. I would advise you to look at that case and that's the legality that this White House has rested. Are you
Speaker 11: confident that if they bring law suits against you, the prosecutors were fired, that that they will succeed?
Speaker 0: We will win in court. Yes.
Speaker 11: And did he personally direct this given they worked on the classified documents investigation and the election interference investigation?
Speaker 0: This was a memo that went out by presidential personnel office, and the president is, the leader of this White House. So, yes. Number of them. Yes. Caroline.
Caroline. Caroline. Caroline.
Speaker 12: Thank you. Congrats on your first day guide on the podium.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
Speaker 12: President Trump and his funding for UNRWA and, also designated the Houthi as a foreign terrorist organization. Right. Both were decisions that the previous administration had reversed. So here's my question. Will there be an investigation into who gave the previous administration this terrible advice?
Speaker 0: Well, that's a very good point. I haven't heard discussions about such an investigation, but it wouldn't be a bad idea considering that the Houthis certain certainly are terrorists. They have launched attacks on
Speaker 13: What's he thinking about that? Yeah. Should those countries expect that?
Speaker 0: Again, he was asked and answered this question this past weekend when he took a lot of questions from the press, and he said that the February 1st date, for Canada and Mexico still holds.
Speaker 13: What about the China 10% tariff that he also amused for last Tuesday, going into effect on the same day? Yes.
Speaker 0: The president has said that he is very much still considering that for February 1st.
Speaker 13: Yesterday, he talked also about sectoral tariffs on, for instance, pharmaceuticals as well as semiconductor computer chips dumped with steel, aluminum, and copper. What's the timeline on those? Is that a similar sort of coming days thing?
Speaker 0: Yeah. So when the president talked about that in his speech yesterday, that actually wasn't a new announcement. That was within a presidential memorandum that he signed in one of the first days here in the White House, on his America First Trade agenda. So there's more details on those tariffs in there. As far as the date, I don't have a specific date to read out to you, but the president is committed to implementing, tariffs effectively just like he did in his first term.
Speaker 13: Finally, he also was asked on the plane when he gaggled about the potential for universal tariff. He was asked maybe 2 a half percent. There was a report about that. He said he wanted much bigger than that. Should we understand that these tariffs would add up?
You know, in other words, you might have country specific tariffs like Canada, Mexico, China. You might have sectoral tariffs like on pharmaceuticals as well as a potential universal tariff on top of that. Do we stack on one of the other or would one sort of take precedence over and out?
Speaker 5: All I
Speaker 0: can point you to is what the president has said on this front. The February 1st state for Canada in Mexico, also the China, tariff that he has discussed. He rejected the 2.5% tariff. He said that was a little bit too low. He wanted to be higher.
I'll leave it to him to make any decisions on that front.
Speaker 13: What the Mexicans and Canadians have done so far? Do you have any comment on whether that is met the borrower? What he wants to see on Treadmill? Thank you.
Speaker 0: I I won't get ahead of the president again on, advocating to a foreign nations on what they should or shouldn't do- to get away from these tariffs the president has made it very clear again that he expects every nation around this world- to cooperate with the repatriation of their citizens and the president has also put out specific statements in terms of- Canada and Mexico. But when it comes to what he expects in terms of border security, we have seen a historic level of cooperation from Mexico. But again, as far as I'm still tracking and that was last night talking to the president directly, February 1st is still on the books. Phil.
Speaker 5: So thank you, Caroline.
Speaker 14: Quick programming note and then a question on, taxes. Programming note.
Speaker 9: Well, in
Speaker 14: terms of programming, should we expect to see you here every day? How frequently will these, press briefings be?
Speaker 0: It is a good question, April. So look, the president, as you know, is incredibly accessible. 1st day here, he wanted all of you in the Oval Office. You got a 60 minute press conference with the leader of the free world while he was simultaneously signing executive orders. I may add that's pretty impressive.
I don't think the previous, office holder, would be able to pull such a thing off. So, look, the president is the best spokesperson that this White House has, and I can assure you that you will be hearing from both him and me, as much as possible.
Speaker 5: And then a question about
Speaker 14: tax cuts. You know, the president has promised to extend the tax cuts from the previous term. I'm curious, you know, does the president support corresponding spending cuts as some Republicans have called for in Congress? And will the new treasury secretary, be leading those negotiations with the Hill as, Mnuchin did during the first administration?
Speaker 0: The president is committed to both tax cuts and spending cuts, and he has a great team negotiating on his behalf, but there's no better negotiator than Donald Trump. And I'm sure he'll be involved in this reconciliation process as it moves forward.
Speaker 12: Caroline, is the, announcement that you made last night on the Iron Dome, it said the president had directed that the United States will build this Iron Dome.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 12: When you read into the executive order, it seemed, short of that. It asked for a series of studies and reports back to them. Can you tell us whether the president has directed this? And if he is as concerned on this issue, why the suspensions that we saw listed by OMB included so many different nuclear programs, nonproliferation programs, programs to wind down nuclear weapons, and and so forth?
Speaker 0: First of all, when it comes to the Iron Dome, the executive order directed the implementation of the of an iron dome. It also, as you said, kind of directed research and studies, to see, if or or how the United States can go about doing this particularly the Department of Defense. When it comes to the other question that you asked about those specific programs, again, I would say this is not a a ban. This is a temporary pause and a freeze to ensure that all of the money going out from Washington DC is in align with the president's agenda. And as the office of management and budget, has updates on what will be kick started once again, I will provide those to you.
Speaker 12: Just to clarify for a sec what you were saying before on Medicaid. It wasn't clear to me whether you were saying that no Medicaid would be cut off. Obviously, a lot of this goes to states before it goes to individuals and so forth. So are you guaranteeing here that no individual now on Medicaid would see a cut off because of the pause?
Speaker 0: I'll check back on that and get back to you. John.
Speaker 5: Thanks a lot, Caroline. As you know, in the 1st, week that the president was in office, signed an executive order as it relates to birthright citizenship, trying to eliminate that. Now 22 state attorney generals have said that this is unconstitutional. A federal judge has just agreed with their argument. What's the administration's argument for doing away with birthright citizenship?
Speaker 0: The folks that you mentioned have a right to have that legal opinion, but it is in disagreement with the legal opinion of this administration. This administration believes that birthright citizenship is unconstitutional, and that is why president Trump signed that executive order. Illegal immigrants who come to this country and have a child are not subject to the laws of this jurisdiction. That's the opinion of this administration. We have already appealed, the rule the lawsuit that was filed against this administration, and we are prepared to fight this all the way to the Supreme Court if we have to because president Trump believes that this is a necessary step to secure our nation's borders and protect our homeland.
And then
Speaker 5: on the foreign policy, Caroline, on foreign policy, if I may. The president's commitment to the NATO Defense Alliance, is it as strong as the prior administration? Is it the same as when he served as president in his first term in office?
Speaker 0: As long as NATO pays their fair share, and President Trump has called on, NATO allies to increase their defense spending to 5%. You actually saw the head of NATO, at Davos last week on Bloomberg Television saying that President Trump is right. And if Europe wants to keep itself safe, they should increase their defense spending. I would just add that there was no greater ally to, our European allies than President Trump in his first term. The world for all nations in Europe, and, of course, here at home was much safer because of President Trump's peace through strength diplomatic approach.
Thank you. Thank you, Caroline.
Speaker 11: And it's great to finally be called on as well in the briefing room.
Speaker 0: I appreciate that. You're welcome.
Speaker 5: Of
Speaker 11: course, we know president Trump just got back from North Carolina and California meeting with victims of natural disasters. There's the 2 year anniversary of the East Palestine, Ohio toxic train derailment. Does the president have any plans to go visit the victims of that toxic spill or just visit in general?
Speaker 0: Not no plans that I can read out for you here. If that changes, I will certainly keep you posted. What I can tell you, is that President Trump still talks about his visit to East Palestine, Ohio. That was one of the, turning points I would say in the previous election campaign where, Americans were reminded that President Trump is a man of the people, and he as a candidate visited that town that was just derailed by the train derailment. No pun intended, and he offered support and hope just like I saw the president do this past week.
It was a purposeful decision by this president, on his first domestic trip to go to North Carolina into California to visit with Americans who were impacted, by hurricane Helene and also by the deadly fires. A red state and a blue state both of which feel forgotten by the previous administration in the federal government. That is now that is now ended under president Trump. He will continue to put Americans first whether they're in East Palestine and Pacific Palisades or North Carolina.
Speaker 5: Caroline. Mister Hunt. Thank you, Caroline. On California, could you please clarify what the military did with the water last night as reference in the president's truth social post?
Speaker 0: The water has been turned back on in California. And this comes just days after president Trump visited Pacific Palisades. And as you all, saw, applied tremendous pressure on state and local officials in Pacific Palisades, including Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass, to turn on the water and to direct that water, to places in the south and in the middle of the state, that have been incredibly dry which has led to the expansion the rapid expansion of these fires.
Speaker 5: Could you clarify what the military's role was where the water came from and how it got there?
Speaker 0: Again the Army Corps of Engineers has been on the ground in California- to respond to the devastation from these wildfires. And I would point out that just days after President Trump visited, the devastation from these fires, the water was turned on. That is because of the pressure campaign he put on state and local officials there who clearly lack all common sense. And I will never forget being at that round table with the president last week and hearing the frustration in the voices of Pacific Palisades residents who feel as though their government has just gone insane. Before president Trump showed up on the scene, Karen Bass was telling private property owners that they would have to wait 18 months to access their private property.
So this administration, the president, and his team that's on the ground in California, Rick Grenell, who he has designated to oversee this great crisis, on had it will continue to put pressure on Karen Bass and state local officials to allow residents to access their properties this is a huge part of it these residents want to- take part in their own clearing out of their properties they should be able to do that the United States of America What happened to our freedom? Clearly, it's gone in California, but not anymore under president Trump.
Speaker 3: Caroline. April.
Speaker 15: Caroline, welcome to the briefing room.
Speaker 5: Thank
Speaker 15: you. Several questions. One on the pause. Will minority serving institutions, preferably colleges and universities, have those monies held back temporarily at this moment?
Speaker 0: Again, I have not seen the entire list because this memo was just sent out. So I will provide you all with updates as we receive them. Okay?
Speaker 15: Also, secondly, when it comes to immigration, there is this southern border focus. What happens to those who've overstayed their visas? That is part of the broken immigration system. In 2023, there was a report by the Biden administration Homeland Security Department that said overstays of visas were 3 times more than usual. Will there be a focus on the overstays for visas as well?
Speaker 0: If an individual is overstaying their visa, they are there for an illegal immigrant residing in this country, and they are subject to deportation. And also
Speaker 15: Lastly, as we're dealing with anti DEI, anti woke efforts, we understand this administration could speaking about, celebrating Black History Month, have you got any, word on that? Anything that you can offer to us?
Speaker 0: As far as I know, this White House certainly still intends to celebrate, and we will continue to celebrate American history and the contributions that all Americans, regardless of race, religion, or creed, have made to our great country, and America is back. Christian Detox.
Speaker 16: Thanks, Caroline. Just real quick. You mentioned the inflation executive order the president signed, but egg prices have skyrocketed since president Trump took office. So what specifically is he doing to lower those costs for Americans?
Speaker 0: Really glad you brought this up because there is a lot of reporting out there that is putting the onus on this White House for the increased cost of eggs. I would like to point out to each and every one of you that in 2024, when Joe Biden was in the Oval Office or upstairs in the residence sleeping, I'm not so sure, egg prices increased 65% in this country. We also have seen, the cost of everything, not just eggs. Bacon, groceries, gasoline have increased because of the inflationary policies of the last administration. As far as the egg shortage, what's also contributing to that is that the Biden administration and the Department of Agriculture directed the mass killing of more than 100,000,000 chickens, which has led to a lack of chicken supply in this country, therefore, lack of egg supply which is leading to the shortage.
So I will leave you with this point. This is, an example of why it's so incredibly important that the senate moves swiftly to confirm all of president Trump's nominees including his nominee for the United States Department of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins, who is already speaking with Kevin Hassett, who's leading the economic team here at the White House on how we can address the egg shortage in this country. As for costs, I laid out costs. I laid out the plethora of ways that President Trump, has addressed saving cost for the American people over the past week. He looks forward to continue to doing that in the days of having.
Thank you, Myra. Caroline, do
Speaker 3: you want more border for
Speaker 4: Are many paid portals down in all 50 states?
@_pblanknews - Point Blank News
Tucker Carlson Takes On Critics of His Interview with Putin | The Glenn Beck Podcast | Ep 210 https://t.co/WfYY3tbIXq
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation explores the complexities of U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding Russia and Ukraine. The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of transparency and accountability in government actions, emphasizing that decisions often benefit a select few rather than the American public. They argue that the U.S. should prioritize its own citizens and interests over foreign conflicts, criticizing NATO's ineffectiveness and the manipulation of public sentiment around race and foreign policy. The speaker also reflects on their experiences interviewing Putin, questioning the motivations behind U.S. involvement in Ukraine and the broader implications for American sovereignty and democracy. They call for a return to a more principled and transparent governance that focuses on the well-being of American citizens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome. How are you?
Speaker 1: Hey, Len. I'm great. I get in late last night. I haven't had a haircut as you can see. Yeah.
So pardon my appearance, but I'm I'm, grateful that you asked me. Thanks.
Speaker 0: Well, I I first of all, I just I I just wanna know, I mean, is this going to be a talk show or are we gonna have a serious conversation? Because I'd like to start with the the history of the Beck family starting at 800 BCE. So what did you make of what did you make of that?
Speaker 1: Well, I was enraged because I thought, you know, I didn't go into the interview feeling like I had to, you know, posture morally. You know? I took a look at the last interview I did with a Western journalist, and the entire interview was the reporter from some dumb news outlet being like, I'm a good person. You're a bad person. You know?
And that I I'm not interested in proving I'm a good person. People can assess. God can assess. You know? I I I just wanted information.
But I was infuriated because they thought he was filibustering. I asked him a really pretty straightforward the obvious question, which is why did you do this? Why'd you send troops into Eastern Ukraine? And he goes on this long answer, and so I interrupted him a couple of times. I tried to.
It got very snippy. And then I realized, no. This is the answer. And, you know, he just thinks differently. I've never met him before.
Speaker 0: So wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait.
Speaker 1: On what?
Speaker 0: So I don't understand I don't understand the story because I had the same question you did at the very end. So are you saying ancestral homelands should be given back to right? Because that where does that end?
Speaker 1: Well, I don't believe in that anywhere. Yeah. Okay?
Speaker 0: Right. Neither do I.
Speaker 1: Not giving my house back to the Passamaquoddy. Okay? I'm sorry. I feel sorry for people who are displaced, but I, you know, I there has to be a statute of limitations. So I thought it was a silly argument to make.
I'm not sure he was making an argument, and moreover, I'm not sure I understand exactly what he was doing, so I shouldn't pretend that I do. There's a lot about that interview that I don't really understand. I don't think he was very effective if his goal was to win a effective if his goal was to win a western audience to his perspective. It didn't make me pro more pro Putin. No.
Not that I was. And by the way, I should just say at the outset, I've been accused of being pro Putin, and I'm not. But if I was, that's okay too.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: I'm an adult man, an American citizen. I can like or dislike anyone I want. I can have any opinion I want. I'm not ashamed of it. And the idea that, like, a small number of people in DC get to decide what I believe
Speaker 0: I know.
Speaker 1: Is not something I accept. So You know? So I reserve I to like anybody.
Speaker 0: Right. And I and I want I mean, you like me. It can't go downhill more than that. The, I wanna get to that here in a second. But first, you had a, a tough time the first time you tried to interview interview Putin.
Okay? How do you know?
Speaker 1: Well, it could be because someone who worked there warned me through a very close very close friend of mine. And I won't bore you with the whole details, but I flipped to Washington to meet the person at his request. I couldn't believe this. It scared me. I immediately called the US senator.
I don't know very many US senators well, but there's one I thought seemed kinda trustworthy. So I said, I just wanna get this on the record this has happened. And then members of congress went to NSA, and they admitted that they had read my email. And so it's I wasn't and I went on TV and described the whole thing, and I thought there would be widespread out of it. I am.
I thought people would be like, outraged. You can't No. You can't use a spy agency that we pay for whose job is to monitor our enemies, our rivals. In other countries, you can't use that against the American population. And no one seemed to care, but I cared
Speaker 0: I did.
Speaker 1: Because I grew up on the US government. My dad ran a federal agency in Washington. So I sort of knew what the rules were, and I had a really strong sense of how much this had changed. Like, this was not allowed 30 years ago. It was an outrage.
It's a crime, but no one seems to be bothered by it. But I am bothered by it.
Speaker 0: So I am too. And I think every citizen should be, especially journalists. You know, when you have freedom of speech, freedom of press, there's two rights that are going away here, and, and nobody seemed to care. But how so then what happened the second time? How did you arrange this?
Speaker 1: Well, I, I just kept trying. You know, I kept actually, I did it myself, with, you know, texting, and I thought and I talked to a bunch of different people. After that happened to me, I I really tried to learn more about privacy and how can you communicate, outside the view of state actors' governments. Mhmm. And you can't if if you're doing electronically.
That is what I arrived at, and I think any knowledgeable person would admit that. There's no privacy, which itself is very distressing, but I just decided I would do it anyway. And I enlisted some non Russians I knew, who I thought might be able to vouch for me, etcetera. And it took a couple of years, and, ultimately, they said, yes. We will, do this.
But if if news of this interview gets out, we're canceling the interview.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: So I started to get so this is the best part. I got calls. I got a call from a New York Times reporter, and then a friend of mine got a call from another New York Times reporter asking when I was interviewing Putin. And there's no way they could have known that. I didn't tell anybody.
You know, my wife, my producers, not even my kids, I didn't tell anybody. One of my children was highly annoyed to to learn I was in Moscow. Why didn't you tell me? I said, because I didn't wanna text it. You know?
But, no, I they clearly did it again. They leaked it to the New York Times in an effort to scuttle the inter and I just again, I I hate to be, you know, mister stubborn principle guy, but that is a principle worth defending. I'm an American citizen. I have not committed a crime. I can speak to anyone I want.
I can have any opinion I want. And you're not allowed to use your creepy spy agencies against me because I'm your boss. This is a democracy. Aren't you always telling me that? But again, nobody cares, so I'm gonna stop the lecture on that.
But it it did motivate me to keep going. And but my real motivation was, like, I just wanna know what's happening there. We're in a war with Russia. We've never had a vote in congress on whether we should be in a war with Russia. No one's ever explained to me why we should be at war with Russia, why I'm supposed to hate Russians.
Why am I supposed to hate Russians? We've got an awful lot of things going on here. The country is in very tough shape, especially right now. It's completely out of money. We're bankrupt.
And so it does seem like we should have more information before we send another $60,000,000,000 that we don't keep track of to Ukraine. I mean, that just I have very straightforward motives, which I've explained many times, but nothing crazy or out of the ordinary, esoteric, or anything like that. Just like like, what is this? Let's find out more.
Speaker 0: Any feeling on why he chose you?
Speaker 1: Probably because I just kept trying. I mean, that was my sense. I just kept trying, and and I was one of the few and I should just say again, and I don't wanna be defensive because I'm I'm not defensive, but I'm I'm never been a I don't don't have anything to do with Russia. I don't I had never been there before. Russian, you know, it's so nuts.
But my first instinct when this happened was that the sanctions were gonna destroy the primacy of the US dollar around the world and stealing people's stuff, 1,000,000,000 of dollars of people's stuff because they were, quote, oligarchs.
Speaker 0: Correct.
Speaker 1: Without any vote on it at all, law enforcement proceeding, much less adjudication, much less real evidence that they had anything to do with the invasion of Ukraine, which a lot of these people didn't. You're a Russian oligarch, said American oligarchs. We're taking your stuff. I was like, whatever happened to the rules based order? You know, that's crazy behavior, and it's immoral, obviously, no matter who you're doing it to.
You can't punish people without a finding of guilt, without proof. And moreover, it's gonna convince, in short order, the rest of the world that you can't trust the US dollar because it's gonna become a political instrument instrument that we use to punish people who deviate ideologically or don't do what we want. And the second, the rest of the world understands that they're gonna do everything they can to exit the US dollar to find another place to store their money. And the second they do that, the United States is going to collapse because this is a society, an economy based on debt. And if that ever comes due, we're done.
This is a poor country, and it's all super obvious. And I didn't know why no one was saying that. None of the geniuses in congress seemed to even think about this. They're like, no. We're gonna punish Putin because I don't know why white Christian country, we hate him.
I really don't know what what the motive is. It's bizarre.
Speaker 0: Well, he's okay. But
Speaker 1: the effect on us is scary.
Speaker 0: It's huge. Agree with that a 100%. Let me let me cast out where I stand on this issue, and then you tell me if it is close to your because I can't figure out where you are exactly. And I bet a lot of people feel the same way about me and others, because it's a complex issue. Putin is a bad guy.
Cold blooded killer throws people off of roofs. You know, he's he's a bad guy. K? Period. Dictator.
But I don't like the Russian leaders either. They are corrupt and dirty, and I don't think that or Ukrainian, and I don't think the Ukrainian leadership, is in it for really anything but money, power, and I'm not sure where all that money is going to. But when you're spending more than you did, for the Marshall Plan in inflation adjusted dollars, something isn't right. And why are we just pushing this through? So I don't wanna support Putin.
I don't wanna support the leadership of Ukraine, and I don't trust Biden and and the administration on what they're doing. They have been in meddling in Russia and Ukraine forever. So I can't say I have a horse with any I I don't wanna put my name behind any of the 3 because I don't trust any of the 3. But I'm still proudly American. I just don't want to be involved in this because some this is a game that's being played where we don't have the information and what the real game is.
How do you where do you fit in that?
Speaker 1: I think pretty close to to where you are. I'm a little more agnostic on global leaders just because maybe I care less. I I having, you know, spent a lot of time out of the country, interviewed a bunch of them, I sort of assume every world leader, all leaders by definition, are up to no good on some level.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: The only thing I care about is the United States, and that's it. And I think the only thing the US government should care about by definition is the United States. So to the extent alliance is good for the United States and my children, then I'm in favor of it. And to the extent it's bad, then I'm opposed to it. I mean, that's I have a very clear lens there.
I have no emotional attachment to any other country. I just I frequently go to, say, Finland or Switzerland, England. I I have ancestors from all of those countries. I like those countries. I love them, actually, but I don't I don't have an emotional attachment.
I am American. That's it. And so the Russia, Ukraine, the domestic politics of either one of those countries, the
Speaker 0: I don't even know that.
Speaker 1: Long standing conflicts they've had exactly. It's of it's of less interest to me, almost very little interest to me, actually. What I care about is the United States. That's the first thing. Second thing is the people around our country are destroying it, and they're doing it on purpose.
And there's no doubt about that in my mind, and I've withheld judgment for a number of years now. But with Yeah. What they've done at the border, completely changing the population of the country, letting in millions and millions of people who have no connection to the United States, can't possibly help our economy, can't possibly unify our very fractured civic culture, and whose loyalty to and knowledge of the United States is completely in question. In fact, their identities are in question. We don't know who they are, and they're coming through a country in the middle of a drug war.
The whole thing is not by the way, bad management or they're not doing their job. No. They're destroying the United States on purpose. And so I'd begin with that. So the idea that those same people are going to somehow affect positive change in Eastern Europe, a region they know nothing about, and it's demonstrable.
They don't know anything at all, is, like, insane to me. And the fact that Republican leaders who really are either, in many cases, just they just don't know, or they're controlled, that is true, are on board with this is just infuriating. So but but I approach this in a very nonemotional way. I'm emotional about my country, and I think all Americans most Americans feel the same way I do. They care about what happens here because your kids live here.
Speaker 0: Right. And I feel the same way, but I look at what's happening around the world because at first, I just concentrated on us. And then after build back better became the slogan for every president and prime minister in the entire western world, I realized, wait a minute. This isn't a western world, I realized, wait a minute. This isn't about Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump and this is we are being led in our own countries, each of us, that to believe that it's us versus the Nazis or us versus, you know, the Democrats.
It's not. It is the people in each free country in the west against I'm not sure yet what it is, but, a really nasty blob up at the top, that has their own designs on the world and their own plans on the world. And there it just seems to me that I I haven't found a Winston Churchill anywhere in the world. Name one that you you see, currently in office.
Speaker 1: Well, there's no difference between most leaders in the west because no western country, including ours, has sovereignty. And sovereignty means you get to act in your own interest. You're a distinct country with, you know, borders in a democratic system where your population decides how it will be governed, sovereignty. And we don't have that and no other country does. So they act as a group.
And I and I do think, you know, always pay attention to the things you're not allowed to think or say. And NATO is is a huge part of this. NATO is, in addition to everything else, totally incompetent totally incompetent. I mean, NATO is a defense alliance aimed at Russia. And it turns out that Russia has a 7 x military an artillery shell capacity, manufacturing capacity of all of NATO.
So all the NATO countries together produce 1 7th the number of artillery shells annually that Russia, this country we were told was a gas station with nuclear weapons, totally incompetent country produces. So NATO isn't even good at the military piece, but NATO is not a military alliance. Of course, it's a political and cultural alliance, and it's the tool with which, you know, whatever this multilateral alliance of unelected people uses to express its will, and it is an offense against our sovereignty. The US military when I set up for the US military, I should fight for the United States on behalf of its territorial integrity and its interests. I shouldn't be fighting for Lithuania.
Like, the whole thing is nuts. And in Washington, criticizing NATO is considered, like, sinful or something. It's a religion. But, of course, what it really is is a scam. It's a it's a money laundering operation, and it's an attack on American sovereignty.
And, like, nobody can say that. You won't find one member of congress who will say that NATO is terrible for the United States, but, of course, it is. It's obvious.
Speaker 0: So let me let me now go to some of the criticism of you that, you know, John Stewart just did a piece. I don't know if you've seen it on you. But yeah. I never watched the movie.
Speaker 1: A lot of stuff.
Speaker 0: I know. So, you know, you went in, you said Moscow is clean. The the subways are wonderful. Look at the chandeliers. Well, you I know you, Tucker.
You're smart enough to know who built those to look like that and why. And Duranty went over
Speaker 1: I said I said it in the piece. So Walter Duranty denied the existence. He was a New York Times correspondent in Russia in the thirties. He denied, of course, the the Ukrainian Yep. Famine war.
Which was Stalin. That's exactly right. And he denied the the show trials of 1937, 38, the the the terror Right. Was was happening. So, those were lies.
Okay? He told lies, and that's why his Pulitzer Prize was pulled from him posthumously. I told the truth in order to shame our leaders. That subway station I showed was built by Stalin in 1939. Joseph Stalin, probably the worst person in human history.
That was over 80 years ago, and it's still in perfect shape. Okay. That's the point. Look at what Moscow has and compare it to what we have.
Speaker 0: So but and
Speaker 1: you have to ask yourself, like, no. This is this is an indictment of our leaders, and I would recommend to every single one of your viewers and listeners, if you can, go spend a week in Moscow. Not not because you love Russia, but because you love your own country and compare that city to the largest city in Europe, 13,000,000 people, compare it to the city that you live in or the city near you, which is in better shape? So so, actually, it's an indictment. It's a radicalizing indictment of our rapidly declining standard of living and the horrible mismanagement of our leaders.
Why don't we have a subway like that in any American city?
Speaker 0: Why give a
Speaker 1: single American city with no crime? Like, what is this?
Speaker 0: Right. Well, I mean, there's not a lot of crime in North Korea either. There's no there's no drug problem really in China because you could just take them off the street and kill them.
Speaker 1: But but but but we didn't but we didn't have that here. And I'm only 54, and I remember it.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: It's not like you have a fascist of an orderly society. We had one.
Speaker 0: So
Speaker 1: And on Memorial Day 2020 with the drug OD of George Floyd, everything changed. And what we got was the intentional destruction of American cities. Now I don't live in a city because I don't like them. But what I missed because I don't live in one is that you can't have a great country unless you have a great city, period, or a number of great cities. Cities define your country.
That's not my choice. It's just a fact. It's always been true. And so if every one of your cities is a cesspool, then your country is collapsing. But they don't need to be that way.
Crime is the easiest thing to fix. You say, we're not we're just not putting up with this. We've done it before. I covered it. I wrote a book on it in 1994.
I watched New York City go from a very dangerous place to one of the safest cities in the world, and it didn't take mass executions. It didn't even take mass incarceration. It just took paying attention to the details. If there's graffiti, wipe it off. If people are jumping over the turnstiles, arrest them.
Speaker 0: People call
Speaker 1: them broken.
Speaker 0: It's called the Windows
Speaker 1: Theory Yes. By James q Wilson and George Kelling, one of the most famous pieces on criminology and really on social science ever written and true to the state. But, anyway, the point is we have a drug crisis, a fentanyl crisis, a homeless crisis, a crisis of mental illness, and a crime crisis, and a filth crisis, just the dirtiness of it. That's all on purpose. That's what I realized when I went to Moscow, and not just Moscow.
Abu Dhabi, which is not a fascist city at all. It's much more a more tolerant place than any place in the west, actually. If you want your mind blown, spend a week in Abu Dhabi. It's true in Singapore, which is pretty authoritarian. It's true in Tokyo, which is kind of authoritarian.
I'm I'm wait.
Speaker 0: Wait. Wait. Wait. I've been to I've been to Abu Dhabi. They'll cut your hands off for, you know, for theft.
I can't talk about
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Christ in Abu Dhabi. So it does have some
Speaker 1: Oh, not true. Oh, not true. Abu Dhabi is a bigger Christmas celebration than almost any American city. Oh, no. Abu Dhabi I mean, I don't know when the last time you were there.
I was just there last week, and I've spent and look. I'm not flacking for Abu Dhabi. Okay? I'm not about Gaza. But the point is that this is the lie that they tell, and this is what I've realized after just spending a lot of time going to different places with an open mind, thinking about how the lessons of these cities might apply to the cities that I care about.
Like, the city I was born in, San Francisco, the prettiest city in North America by far by big town.
Speaker 0: By far.
Speaker 1: Totally uninhabitable. My family's been there since 1850. Wow. So I do feel like some kind of ownership. I I don't have ownership, but I feel a connection to the city.
And it has declined to a place that is 3rd world or worse than 3rd world, actually, because the people running it wanted that. It wasn't an accident. It's not a choice, but liberalism and Nazism. And if you choose liberalism, then you're gonna have 50,000 people shooting drugs on your sidewalks or crapping in your doorway. That's not the choice.
You can have a free society. We had one for 100 of years Yes. Where there's order and politeness and decency and self respect and concern for the individual. If you allow people to OD on drugs in your park, what are you saying? I don't care about their lives.
You are a cruel and vicious person if you allow that, and we are allowing. Our leaders are. And going to Moscow, I'm like, how the hell do they get this? I mean, how did how did this is Russia. This is the country.
And, again, I don't wanna live in Russia, and I'm not going to. But I should be able to live in a city like that, and I can't because our leaders, every big city mayor, most governors, the entire congress of the United States, the White House, they step over the bodies of drug addicts, of fentanyl addicts, maybe the dead bodies every day on their way to work, and they don't notice to go appropriate more money for a country they know nothing about and whose language they don't speak. Like, this is peak insanity. And so, yes, of course, I knew I was gonna be compared to Walter Duranty. And by the way, if Bill Crystal accuses you of not loving America or not, Bill Crystal, no no concern for America whatsoever.
Like, you just laugh it off. You're telling look. I have a lot of faults. I eat too much. I'm kind of a jerk.
I get all that, but I don't I don't think it's a really serious critique to say I don't love America enough. Really? Who are the people saying that? They're the ones who've opened our borders, let fentanyl flow in here, kill over a 100000 Americans every year, and it doesn't bother them at all. And they're telling me, I don't love America.
I'm trying not to use the f word on your show, but that's how I feel because it's just so insane.
Speaker 0: So, Tucker You
Speaker 1: should go to Moscow. You should go next week. It will radicalize you. You will not give up American citizenship. You'll come back to this country and say, we had cities like this.
And if even Moscow can do it, we should do it.
Speaker 0: So I I I think I agree with you a 100%. Where the sticking point is in America right now is there's a lot of people on the right and the left that are both saying screw the constitution. We need a radicalized leader. When, you know, when you look at Orban, I think Orban is great for his country. That's not our system.
I think, you know, the Moscow might be great, love to visit. That's not our system. So I think and I I believe you are you're you've already said this, but I wanna make sure it's very clear on the record. The only path forward for America is through the declaration of independence, the bill of rights, and the constitution. Correct?
Of course. Yeah.
Speaker 1: And by the way, I I should just be very, very clear. If I was I'm like the one person on the planet. You don't need to guess about my motives. I'll just say them. And if I was advocating for a different form of government or for for authoritarianism, for strong man, I would just say so.
I I would have no shame in saying that because I really believe that it's within my rights to say what I think. If I I've I've been called a racist. If I was racist, I would just say it. I would just say it, but I'm not. And I'm not advocating for that.
I'm advocating to return to America of, say, 1993. How radical. Is that really radical? No. I don't think it's very radical.
In fact, I think we should be demanding it. And if there's one thing that I will fault Americans for, it's low expectations. You should not put up with this. You should not allow them. The governor of Texas should not allow millions of people to cross his border.
And I don't wanna hear, you know, the excuses. And I don't wanna hear the excuses for why it's okay to have tens of thousands of people dying on the street or sleeping on the sidewalk in tents handed to them by the Episcopal Church forever. Like, that's not acceptable. It's not okay for my kids to use drugs at the breakfast table. I'm not gonna have a debate about it.
No is the answer. I'm within my rights as a father to say that. The US government is within its statutory rights as a government to say that. We don't need more laws. We have the laws.
The they're not being enforced on purpose and and to your point, why? And, of course, the reason is because people will lose faith in liberal democracy.
Speaker 0: Correct.
Speaker 1: And they will welcome a strong man. And that's exactly what this is about, is the left and not just the left. I would say that the quisling right, on Capitol Hill for whom I just have boundless contempt, they're in on this as well. Yes. People are just gonna give up.
They're not gonna vote that used to they're gonna steal the elections just as they stole the last one, which they did. Sorry. And they're gonna steal the next one. And people just be like, you know what? I don't even care.
I just totally give up. This is crazy. Just just get get the bums off my street. Some guy just exposed himself to my daughter. My nephew just died of a fentanyl OD.
Make it stop. Make it stop. You can have all the power you want. That is absolutely what they're going for, and I don't want that. I wanna live in the country we lived in in 1993 or 1985, not ancient history.
Post Civil Rights Act, we can do that. Let's do it right now. That's my point.
Speaker 0: You're right on that's what they're they're doing. It is it's amazing to watch. It's exactly the stuff that I talked about, back at Fox. It's deep down inside out to say the communist did it. It's the color revolution, and it's cloured and pivot.
It's it's all of it, and it's happening right in front of our eyes. It's crazy.
Speaker 1: People Americans need to know that because our sense of reality is shaped digitally, and Wikipedia is our history, and Instagram is our present, and Twitter is our future x. You know, people forget that we didn't have this just a few years ago, and that's why going to places that are different really reminds you, it triggers in you this this chain reaction of thoughts, and you realize I cannot believe I'm putting up with this. I can't believe there's a homeless encampment in front of Union Station in our nation's capital directly across from the Capitol building. That's so much more horrifying to me than anything that happened on January 6th. That's such an expression of contempt and loathing for the American people.
That's such an admission of defeat and lack of self respect. Like, no. You are not allowed to do drugs in front of Union Station. I don't wanna hear your excuse. I'm not responsible for housing you.
Get out of here. Like, it's just it's not hard. And that is kind of the society that they have in a lot of other countries.
Speaker 0: So let me let me go back to the interview. He the Putin was telling you weaving a story that our president isn't really in control. Wasn't he? And did you Of course. Have you done anything and reached out to try to verify any of this that it was true?
I mean, do you believe him?
Speaker 1: That the president's not really in control of him. Obviously, obviously Yeah. The policies don't change.
Speaker 0: Well, I will tell you. I will I when I heard him say that to you, I thought of something that George Bush told me in the Oval Office. I was asking about the policies and how they were gonna change, and he said, Glenn and then he tried to make me feel good by saying this. Glenn, don't worry. Whoever sits behind this desk in that chair is going to have the same advice given by the same advisers and they'll realize the president's hands are tied.
I walked out of that room horrified. Horrified.
Speaker 1: Uh-huh.
Speaker 0: Then why do we even have elections?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I I I, of course, I I couldn't agree more. And, I mean, look, they haven't released the JFK files over 60 years late.
Speaker 0: I know.
Speaker 1: Okay? No president has just one we have over a 1000000000 classified documents. So it's not a it's not a democracy in the sense that they told us it was. And I think it can be fixed. I think the president's primary power is his communication with the public, and I continue to think that any president who decided to go right to social media, like, a direct feed.
Here's what I know. Here's what's going on. He could harness the power of the population, and he could make a change. I mean, the US the federal government's the largest organization in human history. You can't probably not gonna change it in 4 years, but you could make this country more democratic.
And you know what you could certainly do is change the conversation away from where they want it, which is getting black people and white people to hate each other. Okay? Race hate is a manufactured phenomenon in this country for the most part. Yeah. And it's actually provable.
It happened during occupy Wall Street in 2,012. The mentions of white supremacy and racism in the New York Times went up 100 of fold. So this is an intentional strategy to get people to hate each other on the basis of race. And as I walk around this country, I'm really surprised by how little race hatred there is. It actually No.
Yeah. Hasn't worked very well. Most Americans don't wanna do that, and they don't wanna talk about foreign policy and the economy, which are the core functions of state. And on those two topics, like, why do private equity people pay half the tax rate that you do? Like, that seems like a kind of an interesting conversation.
Shut up. And why are we sending all this money to Ukraine? I I wanna hear an amazing story that just tells you everything about this. So I'm over in Moscow. I'm waiting to do this interview.
It gets out that we're doing it, and I'm immediately denounced by this guy called Boris Johnson who was for a short time the prime minister of Great Britain. And Boris Johnson calls me a tool of the Kremlin or something. And I'm thinking, well, that's I mean, his name's not actually Boris as I'm sure you know. His name is Alex Johnson,
Speaker 0: and he
Speaker 1: called himself Boris in high school. So the guy who calls himself Boris is accusing me of that. I was like so I was annoyed. So I put in a a request for an interview with Boris Johnson as I have many times because he's constantly denouncing me as a tool of the Kremlin. He says no.
So I'm thinking about saying we're getting more annoyed. So I know a lot of people who know Boris Johnson. So I reach out to them. Finally, one of his advisors gets back to me and says, he will talk to you, but it's gonna cost you $1,000,000. He wants $1,000,000 What?
In US dollars, gold, or Bitcoin. No. And, this just happened yesterday or 2 days ago. And and I'm like, he wants $1,000,000. Yeah.
And then he will talk to you about Ukraine. He will explain his position on Ukraine and explain what so he attacks me without explaining how I'm wrong, of course, or how he's right. This is, by the way, the guy who single handedly, at the request of the US government, stopped the peace deal in Ukraine a year and a half ago and is, I think, for that reason, responsible for the deaths of 100 of thousands of people. He won't explain any of that to me in an interview until I pay him a $1,000,000. And I said to the guy, you know, I just interviewed Vladimir Putin.
I'm not defending Putin, but Putin didn't ask for a $1,000,000. So you're telling me that Boris Johnson is a lot sleazier, a lot lower than Vladimir Putin Okay. Which is true.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: So this whole thing is a freaking shakedown. Why 60,000,000,000 I mean, I could get boring on this because I've learned a lot about it. But $60,000,000,000 is not gonna allow Ukraine to prevail over Russia. No honest person thinks that's gonna work. This is a money laundering operation.
A lot of the people involved in it making money from it. And if you're making money off a war, you know, you can deal with God on that because that's really immoral. Like, that's actually really, really wrong. And a lot of people are including Boris Johnson.
Speaker 0: So I pointed out that, the Ukrainians were funding, really through us, this Nazi, you know, group on the border of Russia. We had been funding them for quite a while because they were fighting against Russia. Okay. Now I guess it's okay for everybody to be, you know, in bed with the Nazis. When Putin said that, do you is he just evoking the Nazis because what it means to his people?
Is that really one of his goals? Is that really what's what's hap whatever what what did you finally get from him on what's happening on his side? Why is he doing this?
Speaker 1: I thought it was I thought it was stupid, the whole Nazi thing. I mean, there's no you know, the Nazi party was a German party, which obviously repugnant, party, but was responding to a specific historical set of circumstances growing out of the Treaty of Versailles. So Nazism, there's no there's no Das Kapital of Nazism. Right? And so it doesn't kind of transfer.
Like, Nazism died in April of 1945 when Hitler shot himself. So, you know, there are all kinds of ugly political movements in the world, but let's think of a new name for them. I I think it's like a weird
Speaker 0: National socialist.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Whatever. But, like, what ideology are you talking about? I just don't even under so, like, look. Russia moved into Eastern Ukraine because the Biden administration pushed them to.
There's a war in Ukraine because the Biden administration wanted a war in Ukraine. And that's very obvious, and it happened in public. Biden sent his vice president to the Munich Security Conference days before the invasion, 2 February's ago, to announce in public any press conference that we wanted Ukraine to join NATO. That would be nuclear weapons on Russia's border. Now this is not a new conversation.
This has been going on for 30 years.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: Russia does not want nuclear weapons aimed at Moscow on its border and has said that's the red line as it would be with with for any country for if, you know, if the Chinese did that in Mexico, I hope we would say no. We're going to war before we allow that. And they knew that, and they pushed him to do this, of course. Now their motive, you know, I we can only guess at it, but that absolutely happened. And you're, like, not allowed to say that, but that's true.
Speaker 0: Yes. It is.
Speaker 1: It's not a defense of Putin. It's an attack on the craziness of our foreign policy, which is, like, purely destructive. Nothing is built, only destroyed. It's nuts.
Speaker 0: Let me, let me switch here for, for a second on some things that have happened, just recently while you were gone. Navalny, went for a walk in the Arctic Circle because he liked to walk outside, and then he came back. They say they tried everything they could to resuscitate. Was he assassinated or not?
Speaker 1: Are you asking me if I did it? Yeah. I did.
Speaker 0: No. And I can tell you.
Speaker 1: Oh, sorry. Sorry. I should never I never admit it. Oh. You know, was he assassinated?
I have no idea. No one in the United States has any idea. All these buffoons like Chuck Schumer, the c our senile president jumping up and down Russia to this. I mean, they don't know that. They don't know anything about it, actually.
I have no freaking idea. I can tell you it didn't help Russia to do it. They put him in prison. You can argue about whether they had justification for doing that. I'm not that interested.
Russia is not a free country in the way that the country I grew up in is was, and I care about my country being free. That's all I care about. So, whatever. I don't know. I'm not that interested.
I haven't spent a lot of time reading about Navalny. I know this. Him dying during the Munich Security Conference in the middle of the debate on Ukraine funding, both of which they're highly aware of, doesn't help Russia. Yeah. So the people say, oh, Putin just had him murdered last week because They're idiots.
They don't actually know anything. They don't know anything. These are the same people who told us that Ukraine was gonna win. Really? Russia has a 100,000,000 more people and far deeper industrial capacity.
Like, that's insane. No person outside the United States thought that for a second that Ukraine could win. Not maybe they're rooting for Ukraine, maybe not. I mean, who knows? But as a factual matter, the information desert that we live in is really, really scary.
And sometimes I think maybe the average North Korean knows more about what's happening in the world than the average American who watches NBC News because it's just so distorted. The lies are, like, so it's like a vacuum. You don't even like like, the the two facts I just did, Russia has a 100,000,000 more people and the capacity to produce 7 times the number of artillery shells as all of NATO. But those are just two facts that I'm not sure the average person in this country had its ever before. And those are the determinative facts in a ground war.
Do you have more people? Do you have more material? Do you do you have more house or shells? And, like, the people making these decisions, Anthony Blinken, Anthony Blinken. I can't believe that guy is the secretary of state.
What a mediocrity. That he doesn't know that or something? Like, the whole they're just so ignorant that it's scary. Super scary. But I don't know
Speaker 0: if they are ignorant. Look at look at the Iranian policy. Who doesn't know Iran is a terrorist state that really truly means they're going to burn the Jews in the fire of the Islamic fury. Who doesn't know that? Who doesn't know that enough to say, you know what?
We shouldn't send over $8,000,000,000. We we just shouldn't do it. We we shouldn't play
Speaker 1: I got the office. I understand that. And that was, of course, something that Obama did. And there was And quite a bit of debate with party. And he, oh, boy, he pushed it through.
And I've thought about that for almost it's been almost 10 years.
Speaker 0: No. But Biden has Biden, I think, has done another allowed them to dip in to another 6,000,000,000, you know, as long as it's used for peaceful purpose. You don't you would never make that deal with Adolf Hitler. You'd you'd you know who they are. You know, somebody said to me once, is a rattlesnake a bad pet?
No. It's a perfectly fine pet as long as you always remember it's a rattlesnake. Snake. We are treating people who are in our own country like enemies and people who are oppressing people, we're we're treating them like friends.
Speaker 1: I've been an air model for 5 years. They saw my ears and they're immediately like, yes. We can book these
Speaker 0: are oppressing people. We've we're treating them like friends.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, I've I've noticed that. And and I have to say the disproportionate outrage at the Russians, is puzzling to me. But again, all of it is playing out against the backdrop that I care about, which is life in the United States. And I feel like we're in a moment where things are moving south at high speed Yes. Particularly the demographic replacement, American citizens being replaced by foreigners who are being encouraged to go into the military.
Let's let's hand them we don't know who they are. They don't know anything about the United States. They may or may not be loyal to it. Let's give them guns. I mean, where do you think that's going, Glenn?
I mean, of course, the military will be used as it was on January 6th as a tool of domestic political control
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: Obviously. And it's much easier to do that with foreigners than it is with people who grew up in this country. So that's way scarier than anything that happened to Navalny in some Siberian I mean, I guess it's kind of what I'm saying. It's like I'm against putting Navalny or any political opponents in jail ever, whether it's the January 6th people who are still rotting, whether it's Navalny, whether it's Gonzalo Lyra, the American citizen who died in custody in Ukraine. I mean, I'm opposed to all of that
Speaker 0: stuff.
Speaker 1: But all I don't understand this weird externalizing process of emotion that happens for a lot of well educated Americans where they they don't they're not mad about what's happening around them. They're mad about what's happening in some country they've never been to. It's like, what is that? In other words, it's like you you you've got a kid who's a drug addict, but you don't have time to drive him to rehab because you're sending money to
Speaker 0: The drug company.
Speaker 1: For Quino Plaza or something. No. But you're sending it to, like, some kid you've never met Oh. In a country you've never been to. It's like, what is that?
Yeah.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the story of Chris Bledsoe and his book "UFO of God" is genuine. On January 8, 2007, Chris and his son, along with subcontractors, encountered extraterrestrial beings by the Cape Fear River, leading to a sense of impending doom. MUFON sent a team to investigate, but they aimed to debunk the family's experience, which was later featured on the Discovery Channel. Since then, Chris has had numerous strange experiences, including a visitation from a being he calls "The Lady," attracting attention from various government agencies.
@_pblanknews - Point Blank News
Danny Jones says the Chris Bledsoe story and book titled “UFO of God” is real. On January 8th 2007, Chris Bledsoe Sr. came face to face with extraterrestrial beings and had missing time. While on the banks of the Cape Fear River, Chris, his son Chris Jr. and three of his subcontractors experienced an array of unexplained phenomena, leading them to believe this was the end of the world. MUFON sent their highest trained team to investigate the encounter, only to attempt to debunk and ridicule the Bledsoe family. Their experience was featured on the Discovery Channel's 2008 series UFOs Over Earth: The Fayetteville Incident. This was just the start though, Chris (and his family) have experienced a cornucopia of strange things since that original encounter, including a visitation and prophetic vision from a being he refers to as "The Lady." The Vatican, CIA, NASA, Australian government, UK government, and department of defense contacted him personally asking about the “lady” in white.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I recently had Chris Bledsoe on my podcast. He experiences sightings of orbs in his backyard, which he believes are spiritual or angelic. He documented these experiences in his book, "UFO of God." Notably, he summoned orbs from the ocean while we were at the beach, and we filmed it. His story has attracted attention from NASA, the CIA, and the Pentagon. One investigator, Hal Pobenmaier, traveled from Cape Canaveral to interview him and his family multiple times, trying to verify his claims. Hal, who mapped the moon for the Apollo missions, revealed that there are ancient structures on the moon's dark side, shaped like mushrooms, but he didn’t provide further details.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just had a guy on my podcast about a month ago. He, I don't know if you ever heard of him. His name is Chris Bledsoe. And he he has these crazy experiences where he sees orbs all the time. Like, he goes out into his backyard Yeah.
And he has these orbs that follow him, and he films them, and he posts them on Instagram. Wow. And nobody knows what they are. Wow. That's interesting.
It's it's really interesting. And and he believes it's spiritual. He believes they're angels. Mhmm. And he's got this this great book called UFO of God where he talks about his, like, life story and how how he started witnessing these orbs, and then he started seeing, like, this apparition of a lady.
Yeah. Anyways, he started getting attention Mhmm. From NASA. And one day, a guy from this is all, like, documented and confirmed. Like, he is, like, the most credible the crazy thing about him is his story is so phenomenal, unbelievable.
I mean, post these videos every day. I I He came down here. We went to the beach, and he summoned these fucking orbs from the beach. I I watched this shit come out of the ocean. Wow.
And I it's on video. Wow. It's not just, like, hearsay. It's we literally filmed it. That's incredible.
And the the craziest thing about it is that there's all these people from NASA, CIA, and the Pentagon Mhmm. That started showing up at his house and talking them and interviewing him. One guy, his name was Hal Pobenmaier, who, showed up at his house one day and said, hey, is Chris Bledsoe home? I just wanted to hope hope to talk to you for to talk to him for a little bit. And his son answered the door and and let the guy in.
And he's like, I just drove from Cape Canaveral, Florida. And the guy and he drove to, I think they were in, Fayetteville, North Carolina. Wow. So he drove from Cape Canaveral, North Carolina and sat there and interviewed him and his family for hours Wow. And kept coming back over the like, a couple times a year to ask him questions, and he was trying to confirm if the guy's story was full of shit or not.
Started interviewing people around him, family members, friends, other people who claim to be witnesses of his event. Mhmm. And long story short, this guy becomes, like, close friends to the family. Mhmm. And this guy, Hal, turns out he was the guy who was in charge of mapping the moon for the Apollo missions.
Mhmm. And I guess one day, they were having dinner, and he's like he asked him. He's like, how? He's like, is what they say about the moon true? What's the craziest thing that you could tell me about the moon?
And he's like, there he he asked about, like, the dark side of the moon. Like, is there stuff on the dark side of the moon? And he goes, there are structures that are ancient Yeah. On the dark side of the moon, and that's all we know about them. He's like, there's structures there, and they're ancient.
He didn't tell them anything more than that. And they're shaped like mushroom.
@_pblanknews - Point Blank News
JRE: UFOs Using Antigravity https://t.co/CBk9rS144o
Video Transcript AI Summary
UFO sightings appear to be predominantly reported in the United States, leading to skepticism about their credibility, especially since they are less common elsewhere. The idea is that if aliens were visiting, they would likely choose to explore notable places in the U.S. rather than less prominent locations. There may be both a psychological aspect, influenced by altered states of consciousness, and a physical element involving extraterrestrial visitation. Given humanity's advancements in space exploration, it seems plausible that other species could also possess advanced technology, allowing them to travel across vast distances effortlessly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Seems to be the case that it's, like, primarily happening in the United States. Like, if you look at the difference between the UFO sightings around the world and the UFO sightings in the United States, we're locked in. We're we're locked in. I said this to you last time, I think. Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. When you asked me what do I think of aliens, I was like, I would be a lot more I would find a lot more credible if it wasn't all in North America. Also, as an American, I have to say, it's probably because we're the shit. And if I was an alien, what am I gonna do?
Go to Czechoslovakia? Get the fuck out of here. I'm gonna go check out San Francisco. Like, look at all the shit in the streets. Right.
Look at all the needles. These people are crazy. I think, there's probably both things going on. I I I think there's probably some sort of extra dimensional possibility that I think occurs during psychedelic drugs and during, certain states of altered consciousness that I have a feeling you're you're tuning in to something that's not always available, but probably is always there. And then there's probably a physical element of things coming here from somewhere else because we do that.
It just seems so duh. Like, allegedly, we went to the moon, but we definitely sent rovers to Mars. We definitely send satellites into space to take incredible imagery of Jupiter. We definitely do all that. What why would we not think that another species would do that?
Especially if they get to some position where they're using some unique novel form of propulsion that manipulates gravity and they just they don't even have to worry about g forces. They just appear places, which seems to be, like, what they think these things are doing. Have you
@_pblanknews - Point Blank News
@libsoftiktok Alex and Tucker were right!
@_pblanktrading - Point Blank Trading
'The WORST PLAN YET to Take Your Money - U.S. Housing Market's NEWEST Disaster' with Melody Wright https://t.co/tKniEBlJu4
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the housing market and the increase in delinquencies. They mention that delinquencies are not accurately represented in the reported numbers and that lower balance loans are struggling the most. They also talk about the rise in no contact with servicers and the impact of social media on real estate transactions. The speakers explain how subject-to deals work and the risks involved. They highlight a case of fraudulent activity in a new construction community where developers were selling houses and foreclosing on delinquent buyers. The situation is currently under investigation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Scam.
Speaker 1: Do you think the inventory is a scam?
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Totally. The numbers we're seeing out there are not the true story, and no one really understands that 85% of the mortgage market is government backed. This is the government coming in and enslaving you to debt. Yet again, if it wasn't bad enough, you know, with the credit card fees and things of that nature, if we weren't indebted enough already, you're never gonna get out.
Speaker 1: Government sponsored enterprise Freddie Mac is trying to get second mortgages approved for the secondary market. What does that mean? That means if you have equity in your home and need money like most people do with today's prices, banks and loan originators will be encouraged to write these second mortgages to extract the equity out of your house, and they're hoping that it would be approved that these second mortgages could be bought and sold on the secondary market. Now we already know Americans are broke, bank accounts are drained, and now the only thing that some have left as equity in their home is that what's under attack now. And in this video, Melody Wright talks about the specific topic as well as the misinformation that we're being fed by mainstream media on home inventory and foreclosures and more.
I hope you enjoy the show. Melody Wright, so glad to have you back on our show. We're excited to dive in today, talk about what you're seeing in the housing market. Obviously, you know, it's depends on what part of the country you're in and what you're seeing, but you have a very unique perspective because you kinda study the back end of things, what happens when people aren't paying their mortgage payments. So, just kinda tell us, what are you seeing right now?
Speaker 0: I'm seeing delinquency get sticky, Todd. So, you know, around April of last year, we saw in more so we had seen in December of 22, actually, delinquencies start going up, but they got cured in the tax and bonus season. And in reality, I think people, you know, some hope came after the banks were rescued, and things kinda continued on. But this year, they have not been able to catch up. And so we know that FHA has been struggling, you know, over 11% delinquency there.
But what you're seeing in Fannie and Freddie as well is they're starting, especially and this is what I find interesting, Todd, is, you know, a lot of the lower balance loans that are actually struggling. And I think that's why delinquency looks so good, when you kinda look at Black Knight's numbers, for instance, because the higher balances are the ones that are doing just fine. And so these lower balance delinquencies kinda get hidden. And so, you know, what I would love to see is them look at it actually by count as opposed to these weighted averages. You know?
So we're starting to see it get sticky. Unfortunately, I'm starting to see hardship letters that remind me very much of the last cycle. We're also seeing people no longer the the not contacting their servicers. So when you look at the HUD loan performance report, you can see the reasons for delinquency, the ones that are ticking up our unemployment way more than what we would see by the official unemployment numbers, Also, no contact. And so this is something we definitely saw in the last cycle, and I know this is hard for people to believe, but in reality, when borrowers, so there's 2 things that could happen.
1, they feel ashamed, very ashamed, and so they don't wanna call into the servicer. And then the other is they don't care, and they're an investor, and they're walking away. And so we're we are seeing an increase on in in no contact. It was called as no right party contact. They won't call in.
And in fact, you know, with one of my clients, the first time we heard from a borrower that we had been trying, you know, through the servicer to get in contact a veteran. We got a DOJ complaint. You know? So the things things have changed. People got way more knowledgeable last time about how to kind of deal with default and they're gonna they're gonna, you know, they're gonna be strategic about it this time as well for those that actually do wanna remain in the home.
But that reason for default, no contact is going up. So default's getting sticky. I think, you know, we're also hearing every single day, there's a new tweet out there, new article about property taxes and insurance, and then you've got this condo issue in Florida with the assessments. You know, that that's that's right around the corner, and everybody I've talked to doesn't think DeSantis is going to extend that. And so you have got seniors in serious trouble down in Florida.
So, you know, we are we are we're in the thick of it, and I think by June of next year, like, not a single person's gonna be talking about low delinquency anymore.
Speaker 1: Right now, it's just being covered over.
Speaker 0: Correct.
Speaker 1: As far as 11% FHA delinquency, that's on the rise. That's gone up, right? They don't want foreclosures, obviously. So you're talking about when someone falls behind on their mortgage, you're seeing now because I think since COVID, it was clear that if you're falling behind on your mortgage payments, call your servicer. The the government actually implemented a process to try and have loan modifications for people that are delinquent, some kind of a plan, what kind of payment can you make that required a call.
Right? The servicer would have sort of like a meeting with the borrower, and and you're saying now that that is stopping.
Speaker 0: Well, with with change in COVID sorry to start laughing. But because this is how radically different, loss mitigation is since COVID. You what they changed, you you didn't even have to contact the servicer. They put you on forbearance. If you weren't paying, they just put you on forbearance without any contact.
No conversation. And in fact, now they send out the mods without you don't have to contact them. They're they're just gonna send the mod out in the mail, and it's a letter that says, hey. You've been approved for a modification. If you make these three trial payments, that will tell us that you have agreed to this, but, you know and then we'll send out the formal mod modification docs, and you can sign them.
So there's there's no reunderwriting. I mean, you put it through a calculation, but it's not like what we did back during the DFC where we completely reunderwrote the loan. You know, we got financials. We did all kinds of has your circumstances changed? They didn't even care.
They don't care. They're just sending the mods out in the mail now. And so, you know, this is also increasing moral hazard as we know. So it it's just this game has radically changed. And, Todd, something I hope well, I wanna mention real quick is another reason we think delinquency is so low is because of the reporting out there.
It's it it doesn't show the whole picture. You've got the fed who talks about the commercial banks. Well, we know 70% of origination is at the non banks. Well, you've got Black Knight that has 80% of all servicing, but they're missing some of the big specialty servicers. You take someone like FCI Lender Services, they have a 35% delinquency rate.
Okay, because they're doing nonqualified mortgages as well as private notes. But, you know, someone like Computershare has about a 7%. They do specialty servicing, but also government. So the numbers we're seeing out there are not the true story. You know, in my client books in January, you know, we went from very low bankruptcies, for borrowers.
It increased 200%. From and and so, you know, the it is happening. The foreclosures are not happening because you've talked about this on your show. As we know, the agencies do those nonperforming loan sales, the you know, they tell whoever buys it you cannot foreclose for sometimes, you know, 2 to 5 years sometimes or some of those deals. And, typically, what they're gonna do is go in there and and offer these private investors or nonprofits backed by private investors, Additionally, you know, those private notes, I believe, Additionally, you know, those private notes, I believe that what we may have witnessed around inventory is more a story about NAR becoming less relevant.
You know, the MLS is becoming less relevant because of social media. And so I'm gonna be going to a conference, at next week on private notes, and I'll be talking to a lot of those folks because I think that industry is way bigger than anybody realizes, and this is also another reason. They use very small private servicers. This is also another reason we don't know the true delinquency.
Speaker 1: So how does that tie into NAR?
Speaker 0: So when I say NAR, I'm really thinking of the lobbying group. But I'm just thinking, you know, when you look at those historical, I finally got my hands on the existing home data. NAR, you know, realtordot com, they basically had pulled all that off the Fred site. You couldn't get historical information because for folks that don't know, if you look for Fred, you know, listings for inventory, on the Fred site, that is supplied by realtor.com. And so they took all that off.
I finally got it, and I started looking at it. And this inventory story just doesn't make sense.
Speaker 2: Is a Bitcoin ETF the same as owning Bitcoin directly? While Bitcoin ETFs might offer a familiar face, they lack the true ownership and flexibility of direct
Speaker 0: And I you know, based on everything I've seen on the Fred site, that is supplied by realtor.com. And so they took all that off. I finally got it, and I started looking at it. And this inventory story just doesn't make sense. And I you know, based on everything I've seen with my own eyes, based on, you know, going into existing neighborhoods and seeing things that have been flipped, but the lights aren't on because either they can't do those final repairs or they can't, you know, rent it out, whatever.
So I believe that maybe what really happened is people just stopped using the MLS the way that they had historically. And you saw more and more, of transactions going outside of that system through these private note, you know, actors because they I I mean, you can you can talk to people that, on social media. Just last someone was talking about getting, like, hundreds of phone calls because they were trying to sell a rental, and and some of these sub 2 guys were wanting to assume the mortgage even though it wasn't assumable. And so, you know, I just think that we have underestimated the power of social media and that and we heard about it. We heard about Facebook groups where they would they'd take a private builder.
So in the short term rental market, they get a private builder to build a home. They put it on Facebook, and in 2 hours, it was gone. That never made it to the MLS. And so I think that when all this shakes out, we may actually realize that inventory was just, hey, guess what? We just we we have we have reduced how much we use in MLS.
Speaker 1: You know, Melody, I think you just hit the nail right on the head. When you talk about the amount and social media, yes, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, all of these sub 2 guys, all of the wholesalers that are out there, they are gobbling up this inventory. They're sending out their letters, their postcards. Probably rather than calling their servicer, they're calling these these, wholesalers and sub 2 saying, hey. Look.
We'll bring your mortgage up to date. We'll help you try and save your credit. But what people don't realize is that there it's a very risky proposition, like, sub
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: Subject to for the seller because if the if the buyer or the one assuming the loan and taking the property, the deed of the property, if they don't pay, I mean, that's a whole another, you know, problem in itself. But I think you just uncovered something that I believe is 100% accurate. So what we're hearing is not once again, is not the right story. We're not hearing the right narrative because you know what? I think a lot of these bureaucrats don't even know what's going on.
They don't even have a clue. Right? This is all happening if we were to gather all of these subject to buyers. And by the way, just for, Melly, why don't you explain subject to just so the audience listening, if they don't know, they they may be saying, what the heck are you guys talking about?
Speaker 0: Yeah. It's kinda so, guys, I think those of you that know me know I managed to fall. And so this just this makes me I I have nightmares about this. But, essentially, what'll happen let's say you got behind on your, mortgage. They have in many states, you have to file a notice of default.
There's many ways people can find out if you're behind. And there's whole programs that actually they sell to these investors' licenses. They can look for these notice of default, and they sell you your phone number and address at the same time. And so that's exactly right, Todd, what you just described. They send out postcards.
They send out letters. They knock on doors, and they'll say, hey. We know you're behind. We've got a deal for you. We'll take over your mortgage.
We're gonna we're gonna take it to a to a servicer, and it's all legit. We're gonna take over your mortgage. We're gonna pay your payments, and, you know, but and we're looking for a buyer, typically. Sometimes they already have the cash, but the promise is we're gonna make you whole like, we're gonna, you know, buy out your equity. We're gonna find an investor to to kinda buy this home.
And so then they start making the payments. The problem is that that seller, that borrower is still obligated under the note. And, guys, deeds don't deeds don't mean anything. I I'm so sorry to tell you. But in this country, legal standing, this is what they figured out.
What people can disagree whether it it's in the law or not, but legal standing is that it's the possession of that promissory note. And if whoever has possession of that note, that physical note, they will be able to take your house any day of the week. And so, you know, that's though those little deeds don't mean anything when it's time, you know, to really call in that note.
Speaker 1: So let's just stop right there for a minute. So when you're saying that these subject 2 guys are taking the deed there, so they go in, they say, you know, Melody, I know you're behind on your mortgage. We're gonna catch you up. You're $10,000 behind. We're gonna pay that arrears.
You're gonna sign your deed over to us. At that point, we're gonna continue to make your mortgage payment for you. You're never gonna have to worry about that. And then they do a numerous other things. They could then turn around and sell it if there's equity, and pay off the loan, of course.
They could put a renter in there. They could even rent it to own. They could advertise and have some poor sucker give them $20,000 as a down payment that because because they don't qualify for a mortgage. Right? So they can take I've seen them do that.
I've seen them take a big down payment. It's a rent to own. They don't fix anything. They tell them everything's on them. But you're saying now because what happens is the bank, there's a due on sale clause that if the bank, they get alerted to this deed, you know, they could call the note, the mortgage, and then come swoop in and and repossess that house.
But what the subject 2 guys are getting smart at is they're being taught, don't record the deed, and the lender will never know. So they actually take the deed signed by the sellers, put it in a safe somewhere. They're not registering it. Now what you're saying is regardless of that seller selling them the house or claiming to sell the house, signing the deed over, you're saying that that's subject to with the deed doesn't really mean anything if the bank swoops in.
Speaker 0: 0. 0. And and so so what happened after everybody can remember the robo signing crisis and how the big banks, including my company, GMAC, got in trouble? We we signed a consent order with the Federal Reserve. We also had to sign to the AG settlement attorney general DOJ settlement.
And as part of that, you they came up with these, these metrics, and the 1 a one was legal standing. And what is legal standing to pursue default? Because, you know, you had MERS, the mortgage electronic registration system, you know, all this non which everybody can argue that's legal. Sure. But what is in case law, what what will happen is that whoever shows up at court holding that note, that that is who has in the, legal standing to take possession of that home.
And it's not even I don't you know, the due on sale, I know these servicers, and let you know, you probably get one actor out there that thinks, okay. I'm gonna go do this. But everybody that that that is probably going to be rare. They're just not built to act that way. And and quite frankly, I don't think anyone wants them to do that either, like, the vested interest.
I mean, if we go I think so many of these deeds, Todd, so you take someone like Redfin or you take, you know, Case Shiller or CoreLogic. They're looking at public record, and they're they're taking information off these deeds. And I think what has happened is a lot of these private transactions, just like what you're describing, this is a reason the prices are so inflated because they're going for people that are desperate, and and so they're gonna keep that inflated price on record. But in reality, you know, was that a real transaction? So kind of like what you were just describing at Colony Ridge, when we went there outside of Houston, these two brothers had a, like, a whole foreclosure mill scam for the immigrants there, essentially, because they couldn't speak English.
And so they would sign, you know, these contracts, then they'd be delinquent. They take the they take the property, take the home, and then they'd sell it to somebody else. And, I mean, it was a 44% foreclosure rate, but this was all private transactions. There are 40,000 people living in that new build site, Colony Ridge. It's it's massive.
So this industry has is it's just gone on steroids, and no one has any idea, not even the people in it, how big it is.
Speaker 1: So it's a new construction community?
Speaker 0: Originally. Yep. Mhmm.
Speaker 1: And and you're saying what? The builder is selling the house and holding the paper? The developers. The mortgages? The developers.
Yeah. So the developers are selling the houses, holding the notes, and then if there's a delinquency, they're not federally regulated. Right? They're not they don't fall under the same guidelines. They could just foreclose and resell the house to somebody else, take their money, whatever down payment money they obtained from the original buyers.
It's a whole community.
Speaker 0: Whole community. And and I'll be sharing some of this footage. I mean, it looks like a third world country. Like, it's like a refugee camp. There's, empty storage containers, you know, with air conditioners and, beautiful brand new build house right next to a blown out shanty, right next to, you know, a a lean to, a house inside a house.
I mean, Todd, as a builder, you would have been probably I mean, just unbelievably upset because drainage, like, you know, water, open water I mean, it just the electric wires hanging I mean, you would have lost your mind. I know you would.
Speaker 1: How how is this not being shut down?
Speaker 0: It well, it is. And so, there's a there's a, you know, an AG investigation going on. There's been an expose about it. I think these guys, I mean, I'm pretty sure they're going to jail. But, you know, it just recently, there I think the first exo expose about it was almost a year ago.
But recently, like, around, the new year is when the AG and Texas got involved. But it is it is shameful. It is it is just
@_pblanktrading - Point Blank Trading
"White clots common" https://t.co/WmucUBEmHP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tom Haviland, a retired major in the US Air Force and an experienced embalmer, discusses the presence of white fibrous clots found in the circulatory systems of deceased individuals. These clots, which have been observed in a high percentage of corpses over the past three years, are believed to be made of amyloid protein and fibrin. Embalmers have noticed an increase in the size and prevalence of these clots, as well as an increase in microclotting or "coffee ground" clots. The data collected from embalmers suggests that these clots may be linked to the spike protein produced by the COVID-19 vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I hope you found those early pictures, interesting. They were supplied by major Tom Haviland, who I'm going to introduce now. Tom, thank you for very, very much for coming on this video.
Speaker 1: John, thanks for having me on the show to talk about this very important topic.
Speaker 0: Now, Tom, as, as the name would imply, has been a major in the, in the United States Air Force for a career. Also an engineer, mathematician, and data scientist, and analyst. So in a good position to do this work. Now what on earth what on earth are we looking at here, Tom, please?
Speaker 1: We're looking at white fibrous clots that have been supplied by embalmers, and they're seeing these all around the world. Embalmers are seeing these clots, and they're seeing them actually in a high percentage of their corpses, unfortunately, John. And they've been seeing mostly over the last 3 years. I actually have a, a small vial of the Klotz that I can show the audience live. I'll turn it slowly around so people
Speaker 0: can see
Speaker 1: the consistent.
Speaker 0: Yeah. You can see that really clearly. And and and what are what are they and where did you get them, Tom?
Speaker 1: Got these from, embalmer Richard Hirschman, who was featured in the died suddenly movie. Richard's been sending vials of these out to laboratories and scientists all over the world. We're trying to examine the clots and figure out what they're made of. One of the theories is that they're, made from amyloid protein. Amyloid is a m y l o I d.
Just a fancy term for a misshaped or misfolded protein that builds up in our bodies.
Speaker 0: So And and there's some there's there's some fibrin from blood clotting processes in them as well as there?
Speaker 1: Correct. Doctor Ryan Cole has looked at them, the famous pathologist from Idaho, and he says it's combination of the amyloid protein, fibrin. Our our blood has fibrinogen in it that is in liquid form that then converts into fibrin when there's damage done to the, lining of the of the veins or arteries. And that fibrin is white. And then there's also he's found platelets in there too color and they're colorless.
So that combination of fibrin platelets in this amyloid or amyloid like material.
Speaker 0: And what's the consistency like? Is it is it is it can you pull it apart? Is it rubbery? What does it feel like?
Speaker 1: It's rubbery. It stretches. It's rubbery. It can break if you put enough force on it, but it's it's almost like a rubber band. Like, you know, it looks like a calamari and kind of feels like a rubber band to the to the embalmers.
Very unusual.
Speaker 0: Now the these have been in the embalming process, these are flushed out of the circulatory system, and they're collected by embalmers. So these have been taken directly from the circulatory system of the recently deceased. This is where these come from.
Speaker 1: Correct. The and embalmers have 2 favored injection site points when they do embalming. Their favorite is the carotid artery in the neck. So, that's the main spot they've been finding these clots. They also do, will do an injection site point, sometimes at in the iliac artery down in the pelvis region that then runs down your femoral arteries in the legs.
So that doesn't necessarily mean where the clots are being formed, John, but that's where the embalmers seem to be finding the clots, obviously, is is they're flushing out at these injection site points. However, some of the embalmers have told me recently they've had to actually create more injection site points because when they run into a body that has a lot of these clots, then they have to use alternate points in order to get them all out. And it's actually it's actually a length in the process of embalming. Embalming used to take about hour to hour and a half for an embalmer, and now it's taking you about 2 to 2 and a half hours for for an embalming. So In some of the recently deceased, this
Speaker 0: is actually clogging up their circulatory system such as the embalmer can't flush the the blood out. Yeah.
Speaker 1: And the embalmers, that I've talked to are pretty insistent that they believe the clots are forming before death. They think that they may be forming after death as well, but they're insistent that they're perform they are forming before death because they're seeing them in bodies that are only an hour or 2 old and still warm. They have not been refrigerated. And they just there's no way they said these clots could have formed in the hour or 2 since the person was deceased. That means, Tom, that these clots are almost certainly the cause of death.
Yes. I think it's, you get this in your system. It's quite obvious it can cause strokes or heart attacks. Right? A PC, you know, breaks off and forms an embolism, for example, you can get a stroke.
And one of the interesting things, John, is, the traditional clots like the grape jelly clots and the chicken fat fat clots and embalmers have been seen forever.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: They almost exclusively appear on the on the venous side of the body. But these white fibers clots are appearing as well on the arterial side, on both the venous and the arterial side, which is very uncommon for embalmers to see clots on the arterial side.
Speaker 0: I mean, there's no question that the the if these were occlude these things in arteries would just occlude the arteries. And, of course, you'd have a heart attack, of course, you'd have a stroke. And and the the other thing I'm noticing, Tom, is if we
Speaker 1: look here, this has kind
Speaker 0: of got a branching structure. I think this is what you call a cast. Yes. It is it is essentially a mold from the inside of a piece of the vascular system.
Speaker 1: That's what the embalmers believe as well, John, that it's actually taking you on, like you say, the shape of the main canal and then all the tributaries running off of it. Correct.
Speaker 0: That that's exactly what the this is like. I mean, I can't really see anything else that will cause that. And we've got we've got some more we've got some more, more more examples, to look at, Tom, I think. So here's another example here, 6 inches long.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And that's not uncommon, John. Many of the embalmers are finding these, clots, in this 6 to 10 inch range, and there's actually been some cases where they pulled clots that are 2 feet long out of people's legs. So this is it's a, it's an amazing serious thing that's going on. So it's 6 inches, 15 15 16
Speaker 0: centimeters. And, again, that one's clearly showing a bifurcation in my mind, isn't it? It's an arterial cast. Correct. And if that was in a vessel, I don't see any blood getting through at all.
Quite quite incredible. Now let let's just point out that these just aren't isolated incidents. The these are several. There's some more in a jar similar to yours.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And I I spoke with, involved with Richard Hirschman recently, and Richard says that he has over 250, photos on his phone, doctor Campbell Mhmm. Of clots coming out of over 250 different people. He's got examples of this white fibrous clots as well as another issue we'll talk about called micro clotting Mhmm. As well.
So this is he's he's got photos from lots of people that he's involved.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So that scalpel there again would be about probably 8 inches long altogether. The blade would be a couple inches long. And I think what we're seeing here is we're seeing the blood clot that you would expect.
Speaker 1: Right. And then and then these these little things are just down. Yeah. On the end and and like I said, embalmers have been seeing those forever. They actually look and feel like grape jelly does they dissolve easily in their hands much different than these, white fibrous clots and much different than than, involve us being seen chicken fat clots for years too.
They're they're small, yellowish in color, and they tear very easily. Very different than these large white fibrous clots that are much tougher and more elastic.
Speaker 0: Yeah. The the yellow one, medically, I think we call that white thrombus. It's a well, it's the platelet aggregation. It's a well recognized pathological process. Just look at a few more to show these aren't just random things.
These are more here. Again, very similar. Another example there. Masses of these things. I mean I mean, what kind of volume are we getting, like, a pound of these out of someone?
Speaker 1: It's it's shocking.
Speaker 0: Grams. It was incredible.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And there's different doctors, and scientists around the world that are looking at the problem and trying to figure out how it's forming. There's a few theories that are that are come up recently. There was a paper out of Cambridge and right in your neck of the woods, doctor Campbell, a few months ago to talk about a process called frame shifting where the our ribosomes might be misreading the, modified RNA that they're receiving and producing about 10% of the time of what's called an aberrant or nonsense protein. 90% of the time, it's it's it's producing the correct spike protein that it's supposed to, But about 10% of the time, it's producing a nonsense protein that then could be the formation of these, white fibrous clots.
So So that's what
Speaker 0: Amyloid is a well known pathological pros protein. For example, it accumulates in the brain, doesn't it, in in Alzheimer's disease, for example?
Speaker 1: Yes, sir. Yes, sir. Another theory that's out there is that the, spike protein may be, damaging or irritating the the endothelial lining of the inside walls of the blood vessels. And if it actually causes the endothelial lining to rupture, because it's a it's a thin single layer of cells. Yeah.
The tissue then tissue factor from the interior of the walls of the blood vessels could be spilling into the bloodstream and forming these clots as well. So there are scientists around the world that are looking at the the problem of what exactly is, you know, forming or how this amyloid material is building up in in the bloodstream. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: I mean, the the idea that it's damaged to the vascular endothelial wall, I don't really see that because these things are solid, aren't they? They're you know, if if if that's the lumen of the blood vessel, then the the this white stuff is like filling up the whole gap in the middle, isn't it?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, we think it's growing. Right? So it's Yeah. At some point, it's smaller.
Right? And blood still able to flow around, but then at some point, it completely blocks off a vessel or your embolism breaks off and go through a critical juncture, and that's when you get your stroke or heart attack. So, you know, it may it may be a process where it takes maybe 6 months, maybe 12 or 18 months for these to grow to the size that they become dangerous to a living person.
Speaker 0: Really? So they could be the so they could be growing for some months.
Speaker 1: Could be. We're not sure, but that the the data that I've collected seems to indicate that's a possibility. Because some of the embalmers didn't start seeing the white fibrous cloths until the middle of 2021 after a certain event happened earlier that year.
Speaker 0: Let let let's go back a bit. 2020. Yeah. There was a lot of people getting the Wuhan version of of the SARS coronavirus 2 and then into the alpha. Were and that's before the vaccine rollout, of course, when this disease was presumably rampant because there was no vaccination, were you getting any reports of these white things, whatever we call them, happening in 2020?
Speaker 1: I did indeed, John, to a lesser extent. In our first survey, 44 of the embalmers we we got a 179 responses from embalmers in our first survey that we did, last year, and 44 of those embalmers did see the white fibrous clots. And that makes sense because, like I said, there's a spike protein on the surface of the virus itself, and we believe that spike protein on the virus on the virus itself can lead to the formation of these amyloid proteins. But then the embalmers saw that explode in 2021 when we have the advent of the rollout of the, medical intervention. So, many more embalmers saw the phenomenon in 2021.
As we know, there's a rationale for that. Right? Because the medical intervention was supposed to stay in your deltoid muscle and produce just enough of the spike protein will listen to the immune response and do that for just a couple of days or a week, and then it its job is done. It's got you ready for COVID when it came. But, we know now that that's not what happened at all.
The medical intervention goes all over your body, turning your whole body into a spike protein factory, and it can do that for months at a time. So the scientists that I've talked to, John, believe that it's exacerbated or supercharged the effect of the formation of these white fibrous clots.
Speaker 0: I just have to take a breath, Tom, to pause so I don't get cross. You know, we were told exactly what you said, and it was wrong. This the the the these lipid nanoparticles are systemically distributed. They go everywhere. And, we're just starting to learn some of the consequences of that misinformation, lie, whatever propaganda or whatever you wanna call it, but we'll we'll stick with we'll just stick with this.
So 2021, 2022, did the amount that we're seeing remain constant 2021, 2022, 2023?
Speaker 1: No. 2020 1 and 2022 when we did our survey last year. In fact, we can go to the slides if you want to. We we actually
Speaker 0: We we will we will in a minute. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. But but, actually, in 2023, when we just checked this year, the percentage of corpses, that contained the white fibrous clots went down from an average of about 30% down to 20%.
Speaker 0: It's it's in 2023?
Speaker 1: In yeah. In 2022, it was about 30% of corpses contained these white fibrous clots like like I'm showing here. Yeah. But in 2023, that went down to 20%. And that's not necessarily a vindication of the medical intervention.
Because if you remember, here in America, about 80% of adults over the age of 18 at least the the first two medical interventions way back in 2021. But only about 20% of Americans took the, BA 4, BA 5, VIVA booster in the fall of 2022. And And even less Americans, about 15%, John, took the, XBB 1.5 booster that came out last fall of 2023. So as you get further and further away from medical interventions, you might expect to see less of these white fibrous clots, which is indeed what embalmers said in 2023.
Speaker 0: So, basically, I think we've identified, a temporal correlation and a quantitative, temporal correlation there.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, we can't necessarily say correlation is not necessarily causation, John.
Speaker 0: No. No. But but,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm seeing an awful lot of correlation here. So I'll just let you know that.
Speaker 0: Yeah. We're not sure of correlation at the moment, Tom. That is for sure, unfortunately.
Speaker 1: But I think I think the data indicates, though, John, it is a spike protein problem Yes. Regardless of where the spike protein comes from.
Speaker 0: Of that, I am completely convinced, Tom. Completely. The embalmers you've talked to, had they seen anything like this? Anything at all like this before?
Speaker 1: No. The embalmers I've talked to, John, and you'll see in the survey, these these embalmers have 20 or 30 years of experience, John, and they've never seen this phenomenon before Yeah. Until the last few years. Like I said, they've only seen grape jelly clots and chicken fat clots in the past. Yeah.
Not these white fibrous clots. Yeah. And I've got half
Speaker 0: a dozen big thick books on pathology, and they're not in there. This is a new phenomena. It's a new pathology. Should we go and look at some of your data on the, on the slides, Tom? Is is that
Speaker 1: is that Absolutely. Let's let's go look at some of the data. And then I have a story for you afterwards. It's a bit of a scandal, I think, but we'll talk about it maybe
Speaker 0: after that. Let me give you a story just be just before that as as well. I've I've just been talking to a senior undertaker in England, and he wasn't aware of this, but he's actually been talking to his embalmer just today, who and this guy basically embalms all the time. It's what he does. And, he says in the people he is embalming, he's seeing a 5th to a third of people with these clots.
Speaker 1: That's not surprising to me. That's right in the wheelhouse of the averages you'll see here on the slides coming up.
Speaker 0: 20 to 30%. Now one thing that surprised me, he says that, the amount of embalming prior to cremation and prior to burial is is roughly the same. Again, where we live, it's about 30%. In other parts of the country, it's 50 or 60%. So basically, he's saying 20 to 30 percent of people being embalmed and 20 to 30 percent of those having these clots.
But, of course, there's no reason why the people that are being in barn would not be a representative sample. So from this, it looks like it looks like it could well be that 20 to 30% of people that are dying have got these clots. Correct. It's suggesting is this is just a mind blowing, massive, new pathology. I'm I'm I'm I'm I mean, I'd heard about these clots, you know, about 18 months back, Tom.
But then when I got your email with the information, I'm just blown away. I am blown away. You can see I'm blown away by it. The the the the magnitude of the pathology that we're talking about is immense. And in addition to the white
Speaker 1: fibers clots, as you'll see in the slides coming up, there's been an increase in the traditional grape jelly clots and also this phenomena of micro clotting as well of the blood. Yes. You you did say that.
Speaker 0: As well as the clots, you get in this sort of coffee ground thing.
Speaker 1: Correct.
Speaker 0: And and and, of course, coffee ground is old, altered blood. And this this is classic of, small small, small thrombi, small blood clots. Correct. So so we've got the 2 pathologies here. We've got the, the white ones, and we've got the mic the the microclotting as well.
Yeah. Now this is an impressive study that you've done on your own volition, Tom. Quite impressive. Just, do you wanna just basically talk us through it as as we as we as we look through?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I did the study from December 8th until January 8th, so it just finished about a month ago. Yep. And I used a 2 pronged approach, John, like, to for the study. I a survey.
I sent it to, use a top down approach by sending it to 50 national, regional, and state funeral director associations, each with hundreds of members under them, funeral directors and Yep. Embalmers. But I also use the bottom up approach. I I set the survey directly to over 1700 funeral homes. I found the addresses for over 1700 funeral homes around the world.
Wow. I sent the survey to them directly. It was it was an email with a link to a SurveyMonkey survey, and the survey is really easy to take. This year's survey was 12 questions. Last year's was 7 questions.
It only takes about 3 or 4 minutes to take. And when I set up the questions, John, I made sure that I kept the survey as unbiased as possible. Nowhere in the survey questions nor in the survey instructions do I ever mention the words COVID or COVID vaccine. I only asked the embalmers, what are you seeing, when did you see it, and how much are you seeing? You know, what percentage of the corpses contain these these clots?
So if we try to keep it as unbiased as possible, and the first question we asked the embalmers, by the way, that's not shown on the screen here is, where are you from? So so in the UK, for example, would be what which country in the UK are you in? The United States would be which state are you from? And we we did that. We allowed the embalmers to answer this survey anonymously, John, to keep them, so they can feel comfortable answering the survey.
Yep. But we wanted to check for regionality. Unfortunately, I didn't get enough responses to really determine whether there was regionality or not in terms like the bad batch theory, for example. So I didn't have any data there. But, that
Speaker 0: was We've just we've just established that this is probably about the same prevalence in the United States and the United Kingdom.
Speaker 1: Correct. Correct. So the second question we asked him is this year is, how long have you been an embalmer? As you can see, quite a few embalmers have at least 20 years of experience. This is
Speaker 0: a great Highly experienced individuals. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So they know what the blood looked like in the years prior to COVID. They know what it looked like in the year of COVID but no vaccines. And then they know what the what it looks like in the years of both COVID and the vaccines.
Speaker 0: Yep.
Speaker 1: Well, that's that's a good thing.
Speaker 0: Yep. We're dealing with experienced people.
Speaker 1: So the next question we asked them, yeah, is how many corpses a year do you embalm? As you can see, the average there is about a 100 if you average the bars together. So they they see bodies on a regular basis. Some of the embalmers, like, mister Richard Hurstman, who's a trade embalmer in Alabama, who's in the Diet Sunday movie, Richard does, over 300 corpses a year because he he actually embalms at 12 different funeral homes. So he does lots of he'll do 2 or 3 bodies a day sometimes.
But the average is a 100 corpses a year. So these people, they know what they're seeing.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Again, it's it's not a rare event. It's a common thing, isn't it, that's happening?
Speaker 1: Correct. We asked them again this year. Yeah. Did you observe the white fibrous clots again this year in 2023? We wanted to see how that compared to 2022.
As you see there, John, 197 out of the 269 embalmers that responded to the survey are indeed seeing the white fibrous class still in the end of year 2023. So that's not a good sign. So then the next natural question we asked John after that is, well, in what percentage of your corpses are you seeing these white fibrous clots? And as I said earlier, it's down a little bit from our survey last year in 2022. And that's a good thing.
We're down from 30% to 20%. And that includes by the way, if you if you average all the bars together, including the green bar with the 63 embalmers that said none, if you include that as well, you get about an average of 20% of the corpses that, the embalmers saw these white fibrous clots in. But, you know incredible. This this
Speaker 0: this the the the this is looking like this could be the cause of 1 in 5 deaths.
Speaker 1: Well, look over there on the left. You can see a 48 of the embalmers saw them between 21 to 40% of their corpses. Another 29 embalmers saw these white fibers clash between 41 to 60% of their corpses. 11 embalmers saw between 61 to 80% of their corpses.
Speaker 0: And then
Speaker 1: we have 6 embalmers that said they saw between 81 to a 100% of their corpses. So it's it's telling me, John, this is not a rare phenomenon. These things are prevalent. So it's it's quite and and we said earlier, they've never saw these clots prior to, to 2020.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Incredible.
Speaker 1: Shocking. We also asked the embalmers about microclotting, and they don't describe it as microclotting. As as you said, they'd call it what looks like coffee grounds.
Speaker 0: That's exactly what it looks like. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. As the as the blood's draining off the corpse and they're trying to get the formaldehyde in, they'll see what looks like coffee grounds in the blood. They also call it dirty blood.
Speaker 0: Yep. And we
Speaker 1: ask the embalmers, did you see that in 2023? And look at the results there, John. 212 of the 269 embalmers, 79% are seeing this phenomenon in 2023. Now this phenomena
Speaker 0: of coffee grounds, they might have seen this occasionally in people who had blood clotting disorders prior to 2020.
Speaker 1: Correct. If you go to the next slide, that's But very rarely. Yeah. You're yeah. In that note there.
Yeah. They would see a very rare one of the embalmers, I think, told me that he would see it particularly in, patients that had heavy chemotherapy. He'd see coffee grounds or dirty blood in them. But as you can see there, the average of all those bars is, 25% of corpses in 2023 containing these, the micro clotting, the the the coffee grounds or dirty blood. So that's at least a 5 times a quintupling of that phenomenon since the years prior to COVID.
So it it means yeah. Again, you know, look over there to the left, 58 of the embalmer saw between 21 to 40% of their corpses. 32 of the embalmers saw the microclotting between 41 to 60% of their corpses. 16 embalmers between 61 to 80% of their corpses. So this is an alarming and we as we talked about earlier, this could be just as dangerous as these large white fibrous clots.
Certainly. Yeah. Because, you know, it it the micro clotting occurs at the capillary level, and it can block the exchange of oxygen at the lungs and then the carrying of that oxygen to all the major organs of the body, you know, including the brain and, you know, like your eyes. You're you have small capillaries in your eyes. So this is, just as dangerous a phenomenon as the white fibrous clots.
Speaker 0: Well, we've got we've got blood vessels going. The only part of the body without blood vessels is the very front clear part of the eye. Everywhere else has got a vascular blood supply. So it's otherwise, it'd go black and drop off.
Speaker 1: Because we asked the embalmers last year survey, we asked them about the grape jelly clots. So we asked that question to them again this year. And as you can see, 40 percent, the the embalmers on average are seeing, the grape jelly clots in about 40% of their corpses in 2023. And they've not only seen more, there's they're they've increased in viscosity. They've gotten they're more like grape jam now than grape jelly.
So the next question, we compare that to, what they saw in the years prior to the pandemic.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And if you go to that slide, you'll see that, they saw them in 30%. So it was still a high number, but but there's still an increase from 30% up to 40% now in 2023. So that can be alarming as well.
Speaker 0: So we're getting 5 times more microthrun by, the the little coffee grounds.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 0: We're getting 30% of the, the bigger clots.
Speaker 1: 30 30 up to 40% now. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And we're getting a 100% more of the the white ones. So all of these intravascular pathologies are Yeah. Massively increased.
Speaker 1: Correct.
Speaker 0: Wow. 30%.
Speaker 1: Yeah. One of the other things that Embalmers mentioned to me throughout the year that we went ahead and asked a question on this year is, about infant deaths. And, you know, this is a very stat area. I guess the good news, John, is that you see the longer bars, the no bar, a 184 embalmers, 69%, said they were not seen. Another 25 embalmers couldn't answer the question because they were they were younger embalmers and weren't embalming prior to 2019.
But only 20% of the embalmers said they saw an increase in 2023 in infant deaths when compared to the years prior to the pandemic. So, but but that can still be alarming in and of itself, and there's actually a little bit of explanation for that. I've been told by some of the embalmers that, there seem to be a lot more cremations these days of infants. So if there is a problem with the infant, obviously, that evidence is being destroyed. Yeah.
And a lot of the, embalmers have also told me that hospitals these days seem to be more prone to asking the parents if they wanna let the hospital handle the, disposal of the remains of of the child. Yeah. So I think some of the embalmers are seeing less, you know, infancy date because of those two reasons. But if you go to the next slide, we ask the
Speaker 0: Infant being let up to 1 year old, are you classifying that as, Tom?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Because we included a a stillborn stillborns in there and SIDS as well. You know? Because there's there's been cases of SIDS where Certain infant deaths. Right.
In the crib, yeah, I've passed away, unfortunately. And we know, John, that, the spike protein from the medical intervention has been found in the breast milk of women going to the child. It's also being found, I believe, in the delivered placentas, you know, after the woman delivers the child delivers they found the spike protein in that as well. So this is really unfortunate if the spike protein is getting through from the mother to the infant. It's quite an unfortunate situation.
The next slide tells you of the, of the 20% who did see the the, an increase in infant deaths in 2023 compared to the pre COVID years. They saw an increase of about 25%. So excluding that blue bar, if you don't average that one in, if you start with just the yellow bar down and average those together, you get a 25% increase in InfantDesc for just those that solve the increase. So not a good thing.
Speaker 0: Not good at all. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Our last question on this year's survey, John dealt with age stratification. We did not get a chance to ask the embalmers last year about that. And I wasn't too surprised the results here. You would expect probably to see, we asked them, did you see an increase in the clots in 2023 of all types? You know, grape jelly, white fibrous clots, the microclotting in any particular age group, and we if we ask them to mark all age groups that apply so they can mark multiple answers on this one.
And as you can see, the longest bar there is in as people get to that age, they start to have problems, you know, with cholesterol plaque buildup in their system. But I am a little bit disturbed, John, by that that 36 to 50 year old bar. It's a pretty long bar there. 89 of the embalmers saw an increase, in the clotting and clots. Yeah.
Yeah. And, you know, this is the age group. You don't normally associate these people with having heart attacks and strokes. Usually, that starts happening when you're in your late fifties, early sixties. Correct.
But now, you know and this information, this data actually dovetails very nicely or very closely to what Edward Douds has been finding in the insurance industry. He's been taking a look at both USA and UK death and disability data, and he's found a tremendous increase over the last 3 years in that particular age group of 36 to 50 year olds. So the the the data that the embalmers are supplying to me dovetails very closely to the insurance death and disability data from Edward Dowd.
Speaker 0: And we also know there's been an increase in excess deaths certainly in the UK nationally in that age group as well.
Speaker 1: Same here in the United States. We've had, you know, at least 10% excess mortality over the last 3 years in the United States and in most countries over the western countries around the world. Surprisingly, we haven't seen much excess mortality at all in African countries that, had very little uptake on the medical intervention.
Speaker 0: Yes. It's a lot of a lot of extra people are dying, and you've just identified yet another yet another correlation. We're getting a lot of correlations as as as you say. Now the this is from a in Barmas. In the UK, I think we're doing less postmortems now.
Is that the same situation in the States?
Speaker 1: It is, unfortunately. There's there seems to be a lot less autopsies done. Yes. And And it's surprising in it because if you were the parent of a 20 or 30 year old that was in great shape and then they died suddenly, wouldn't you want an autopsy performed on your absolutely your child? Yeah.
I would too.
Speaker 0: Otherwise, you're gonna spend the rest of your life wondering what the heck.
Speaker 1: Yes. But I believe unless there's foul play suspected or maybe like overdose on drugs, you know, where they do toxicology, then coroners and medical examiners will not take close looks at the vascular system. They may look closely at the heart, but not at the rest of the vascular system. So the embalmers I'm talking to believe that there a lot of the medical examiners are missing these clots, and the the embalmers are the ones finding them, John.
Speaker 0: I think that's true because the embalmers are looking at all of the circulatory system because they're flushing it out. Whereas in the autopsy situation, you might just be taking a slice. For example, a coronary artery. I mean, the the the postmortems I've been to, they don't, like, slice open the arteries and look at the inside. You know?
It's not that's not a common And I think some
Speaker 1: death certificates are just saying, like, you know, thrombosis or embolism or something like that. They they they don't describe, I believe, the type of clot, whether it was a grape jelly or a white fibrous clot or micro clotting that they saw. They just generally label it as thrombosis. So, unfortunately, I don't think we're getting good, you know, stratified data in terms of how often death certificates from coroner reports on exactly what types of clots they're pulling out of people or seeing
Speaker 0: Even some, still surprised that pathologists aren't bouncing up and down about this saying just a minute there's a new disease here because you know if you discover a new disease you can call it you can you can call it after you can Campbell disease you know Haviland disease. You know? I mean, you know, you think they've they've discovered something new. They'd be absolutely chomping at the bit to write a paper about it.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, I've it's hard to, find something if you don't go looking for it, John.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And like I said earlier, I think I haven't I I wouldn't call it necessarily a scandal, but that's the first word that kinda comes to my mind. Yeah. When I, first did this survey and sent out to the world, the the the, 50, funeral director associations and the 1700 funeral homes around the world. I started the survey on the 8th December for this most current survey. After about 5 days, John, I only had about 14 responses of my SurveyMonkey collector.
I said, this is terrible. What's going on here? I should have a lot more responses than this. So I had a list of the 30 US state funeral director associations that I had sent this survey to. I picked the top 30 US states by population.
Yep. And I and I called each one of them, their telephone, and I talked to either their president or a secretary or somebody else in their office. They said, hey, could you please forward that, survey that, the email I sent you last week with the link to our survey down to your embalmers.
Speaker 0: Yep.
Speaker 1: And, well, god bless the Pennsylvania Funeral Directors Association, John. He did. Exactly as I asked. Because I got up the next morning, and I saw 93 responses from embalmers in my survey monkey collectors. And they were all from one state, Pennsylvania.
I then got up the next day, and I saw 32 more responses from embalmers, and they're all from Pennsylvania again. So in 2 days, I got a 125 responses from embalmers in just a single US state. And it told me 2 things, John. It told me, first of all, that embalmers, they wanna tell you what they're seeing in the room if if they feel like they have their permission from their funeral director boss or from their state funeral director association.
Speaker 0: Yep.
Speaker 1: But it also told me something else. Remember, there was 29 other funeral director associations here in the United States that I sent that email to, so they must not have sent it down to their to their embalmers. They must have suppressed it, deleted my email, and not forwarded it to their embalmers to take. So it's telling me that there is a terrific suppression going on at the either the funeral director association level or the funeral director himself, not pushing the survey down to their embalmers to take.
Speaker 0: The idea you have collected is somewhat representative of the world really because we've got data from the U. K. Which is consistent, some data from Australia, a little bit from New Zealand, a little bit from Canada. And and and the the little bit that is getting through is essentially consistent, is it, Tom, with the numbers?
Speaker 1: It is. I've I've got very poor responses, though, frankly, out of the UK and and Australia and New Zealand. It seems to me that the fear factor is even worse there in in your areas of the world than it is in the United States or Canada. The bulk of the response that did come from the United States and Canada. But, and I have two theories why that might be, John.
If you're one of these funeral director association presidents are funeral directors themselves. You know, they elect one of their own to be the head of their state association. Would you wanna participate in the survey if you think that there might be a link between the medical intervention and the formation of these white fibrous clots, you know, or the microclotting and all these issues have been popping up the last 3 years. So especially if you mandated that all of the employees of your funeral home take the medical intervention. You know, you might be setting yourself up for a lawsuit.
So and the other reason I think is, as I said earlier, 80% of Americans here, took at least the first two medical interventions. So there might be a little personal cognitive dissonance going on where they may not wanna know the answer themselves to the question. So yeah. One one of the other proof I have, by the way, in your country is when I I sent the survey to, like, 6, national, regional, and funeral director associations in the UK. London has their own.
There's a British Institute of Embalmers. There's also a UK National, Association of Funeral Directors.
@_pblanktrading - Point Blank Trading
#BREAKING White clots USA, Part 2 Embalmers out of the US are sounding the alarm 🚨🚨 Finding up to 50% of patients having white clots in their arteries, finding 20-inch white clots in the carotid arteries. https://t.co/2HEDwAtTLz
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the formation of white fibrous clots in living patients, showing images of these clots from various cases. They highlight the potential impact of these clots on blood flow and suggest they could be a factor in causing death. The speaker also presents evidence that these clots can form postmortem. They share a story of a young man who experienced cardiac arrest during a clot removal procedure. The presentation concludes with a mention of additional specimens that further support the existence of these white fibrous clots.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of course, the main question in in my mind, and I I know in your mind as well, Richard, indeed in minds around the world, is just when are these clots forming or these fibrous structures, protein structures, whatever we're gonna call them. Is it before death? Is it a long time before death? Are they there for weeks? Are they there for months?
Are they there just in the minutes before death? Are they forming during the dying process, or are they post mortem clots? And I don't think we have a definitive answer to this, but you've been a bit of a hub really for, people sending you pictures. And we've got 2 pictures from living patients here that you have got expressed permission to share. So let's look at those now.
Speaker 1: I was sent that image by a doctor, and this is apparently some kind of a drain tube that was allowing some fluid to drain off around or near the pancreas, if I recall. But it wasn't actually in the vascular system. And they found this really interesting, and the most alarming thing is it looks very similar to the same clots I'm seeing. And this person is still alive.
Speaker 0: And this specimen is also from a living person, we believe, Richard?
Speaker 1: Yes. That is the specimen that we just looked at that was put into a container and you're just looking up at it. Look how it looks ropey.
Speaker 0: Well, it does look very similar, doesn't it?
Speaker 1: Absolutely.
Speaker 0: So whose hand are we looking at here, Richard?
Speaker 1: That's my hand. That came out of the carotid artery on the right side.
Speaker 0: And I think we can clearly see it's taken up the shape of the inside of the blood vessels. It's almost like a cast of the inside of the blood vessels with with a bifurcation where the arteries would divide.
Speaker 1: It felt like, it felt like a squid. Very rubbery.
Speaker 0: And just think what that would do to the blood supply in a living person. It would just stop the blood supply if it occurred in life and would be the cause of death.
Speaker 1: Right. And, John, that wasn't even rinsed off. It came out just like that. You still see the blood as stuck in a couple of parts of it.
Speaker 0: And, you took that image, yourself, Richard, personally? Correct.
Speaker 1: Yes. Now this specimen right here, I don't remember the exact case, but the interesting thing is if you see the the dark the dark black reddish looking stuff, now that looks almost like a typical blood clot. But it's that white fibrous strand that is seriously abnormal.
Speaker 0: And as we've said, this is a new pathology. This white material is new. The red blood clot we've seen before, but, of course, this white material is a new pathology. Now this picture here is usefully giving us a sense of scale.
Speaker 1: Yes. That's about if I recall, that's about 17 inches Those came out of the, the jugular or, carotid artery in the neck. Now this person was diagnosed with blood clots, but the inflammation around the heart was so bad that they couldn't do surgery fast enough in order to remove them.
Speaker 0: So it's quite within the realms of possibility that these clots were the cause of death in this particular individual.
Speaker 1: Well, according to what I was told, he was in the hospital for blood clots, and he was and they were in they they wanted to do surgery to get him out, but they didn't have enough time.
Speaker 0: I mean, that's just huge, isn't it? I mean, it's reasonable to assume I think that that would essentially close off the blood supply if the patient were alive with terminal consequences.
Speaker 1: Now, John, I'm glad you bring that up because people will say, well, I don't know how that's possible. But I believe what happens is if these are forming the white fibrous stuff and it's just that, there's enough room for the blood to go around these clots.
Speaker 0: Interesting. So your impression is it's not a complete cast of the inside of the vessel. It's like a sort of string following the internal lumen of a vessel rather than something that's gonna block it off completely?
Speaker 1: Well, not not totally. Not totally. You're going to have an image. You're going to share that. I'm going to explain that a little bit better on coming up.
Speaker 0: Now this next specimen here that we see in a jar, it was actually taken out of a tube that was carrying the patient's blood prior to their death. So the patient had this tube attached for a medical procedure. Their blood was flowing through it, and then you took this out of the tube because the tube was supplied with the body of the patient.
Speaker 1: Correct. Yes. And this was my one of my first 100% confirmations that these clots can form post mortem, because at the end of the tube was a, where where where the blood goes in had small holes in it allowing the blood to enter the tube or or go through the tube. These clots were way too large to go through those small holes. So it must have formed inside the tube that was holding the blood.
Speaker 0: Well, this is giving us pretty conclusive evidence really that these clots can occur postmortem, but we also have strong suspicions that they can occur around about the time of death or before death and be involved as a cause of death as well.
Speaker 1: Yes. I spoke to a lady, just a few days ago who lost her 25 year old son. And she's wanting she's gonna share her story, her son's story, but she spoke to the surgeon and asked the surgeon if these, when they were trying to remove the clot from this man, was this a fibrous rubbery clot and he confirmed with her it was. And when that surgeon was trying to remove it, it broke free. Her son ended up in cardiac arrest, and they tried for over an hour to revive him, but, unfortunately, he didn't make it.
Speaker 0: Now I do have quite a few more specimens, but I think we might be dealing with the art of the possible here. So we'll just put that up as a short, section because I really wanted to get those, specimens to you. This is the physical photographic evidence. These strands of white material exist. There is more to come, but we'll, I think you get the message.
We'll see how this goes.