reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @_taylorhudak
reSee.it AI Summary
Member States are granting unprecedented constitutional powers to the WHO, allowing them to establish mandatory global conditions. Swiss lawyer Philipp Kruse discusses the WHO's pandemic treaty and IHR amendments in a speech in DC.
@_taylorhudak - Taylor Hudak
“Member States will transfer constitutional powers to the WHO to an extent never seen before.” Lawyer Philipp Kruse speaks in DC on WHO’s pandemic treaty and IHR amendments. WHO will be given full discretion to set up conditions which would be made mandatory on a global scale.
Video Transcript AI Summary
These new pandemic agreements involve 194 member states and the World Health Organization. They ignore scientific evidence on collateral damages and give WHO unprecedented power to declare emergencies without clear standards. The agreements allow mandates, including experimental injections, on a global scale. WHO can declare any public health emergency under the concept of "one health," from fighting influenza to addressing climate change, potentially leading to future pandemics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the information that is hidden from the people and that everybody must know with respect to these new pandemic agreements. Both of these legal instruments are technically international agreements. They are concluded between 194 member states, but they involve and has as a target and objective, the World Health Organization as a third party. Number 2, these agreements are negotiated without taking into consideration the massive and undeniable amount of data and of scientific evidence about the collateral damages of the global pandemic management of the WHO, And the WHO, as probably most governments, are still today in a state of total denial with respect to these collateral damages. There's no learning.
Even worse, this new pandemic, legal regime will legalize all the methods of this pandemic period under COVID 19 that have proven to be harmful or wrong. 3rd general remark, on the basis of these two legal instruments, member states will transfer constitutional powers to the WHO in ex in an extent never seen before. WHO will be given full discretion to set up conditions under which all kinds of mandates, including injections of experimental substances, can be made mandatory on a global scale. I come now to the details. Number 1, WHO's already existing authority to declare a public health emergency of international concern will become massively extended.
They will be allowed to declare all kinds of public health emergency under any given reason without any, responsibility to clear standards. This will come under the title and concept of one health. So whether to fight a human influenza with a new subtype, or to reduce rising level of CO 2 or to respond to the loss of biodiversity or to fight climate change, all of that can give rise to the next pandemic.
@_taylorhudak - Taylor Hudak
Full speech by Swiss lawyer Philipp Kruse: https://rumble.com/v4fxd89-rob-roos-and-philipp-kruse.html
ROB ROOS AND PHILIPP KRUSE
http://JamesRoguski.substack.com 310-619-3055 Original video: https://rumble.com/v4fscbr-live-federal-health-agencies-and-the-covid-cartel-what-are-they-hiding-roun.html
rumble.com
@_taylorhudak - Taylor Hudak
“I cannot understand how anybody whoever recommended this mRNA vaccination can sleep soundly now. I would not be able to.” - Prof. Arne Burkhardt Full interview: https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/arne-burkhardt-interview-12-23-23/ https://t.co/tbDq6c2OtK
Video Transcript AI Summary
I cannot understand how anyone can recommend the mRNA vaccination and sleep well at night. They seem afraid to admit they were wrong. I want to give you a chance to address your colleagues, fellow pathologists, and medical professionals. My advice is to always question what so-called experts say. You don't need top scientists, you need experienced doctors who think critically. In the past, people died from the flu without it being turned into a pandemic or locking people away.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I cannot understand how anybody who ever recommended this this MERT mRNA vaccination can sleep soundly. Now I would not be able to do this and I can only consider that they are afraid and they do not have the courage to come out and say, well, I was wrong. Well, now I would like to give you an opportunity to address your colleagues, fellow pathologists, fellow medical professionals. What do you have to say to them? Let me take a look.
Well, I think one of the thing is always question what so called experts tell you. Now they have a new term and they call it top scientific, so top virologists, top pathologists, and I think this is not in the interest of the people. You don't need top scientist, you need soundly thinking people with experience with patients, doctors that have experienced in their everyday life, there were people dying by the flu for many years, nobody ever made a pandemic out of it, and locked people away because of that.
@_taylorhudak - Taylor Hudak
Prior to the roll out of the C19 vaccines, Prof. Burkhardt saw 1 or 2 cases of myocarditis out of 1,500 to 2,000 autopsies per year. After the C19 vaccines, he says this is one of the most common diagnoses in younger people. Full interview: https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/arne-burkhardt-interview-12-23-23/ https://t.co/Ja8RhGJSWC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Before the COVID-19 vaccine, myocarditis cases were rare, with only 1 or 2 cases per year out of 15,021,000 autopsies. However, now it has become a common diagnosis, particularly among younger individuals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Prior to the rollout of the COVID nineteen vaccinations, when you look back on your career, how often did you see myocarditis then compared to now within the past 2 years?
Speaker 1: I don't think I saw burocarditis more than once a year. To and at that time, we did between 15,021,000 autopsies a year to And as I said, 1 or 2 cases a year. To? And, now this is one of the most common diagnosis in especially in younger people.