reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @adhtvaus
reSee.it AI Summary
The excess deaths in Australia are alarming, equating to two jumbo jet crashes every week since 2021. @AMPS_RedUnion's document, 'Too Many Dead,' highlights the increase in deaths after the introduction of Pfizer and Moderna's MRNA products. Julian Gillispie from Children's Health Defense discusses this on Spectator TV with @ellymelly. For more information, watch the full episode and get a copy of the book.
@adhtvaus - ADH TV
"The excess deaths in Australia continue to equate to about two jumbo jet crashes each week, and every week, since 2021." "The formidable document which @AMPS_RedUnion put together 'Too Many Dead' addressing the excess deaths which only started to occur in Australia just after the introduction of the MRNA products of Pfizer and Moderna." Says Julian Gillispie (Director of Children's Health Defense, Australia) with @ellymelly on Spectator TV (@SpectatorOz). Video by @TheMilkBarTV To get a copy of the book 'Too Many Dead': https://amps.redunion.com.au/too-many-dead FULL EPISODE: https://watch.adh.tv/spectator-tv/season:2/videos/spectator-tv-australia-friday-16-february-2024 @DowdEdward @DrAseemMalhotra @JesslovesMJK @Kevin_McKernan @JosephFraiman @ClareCraigPath
Video Transcript AI Summary
Politicians daily reported COVID cases and deaths, but now 29,000 excess deaths raise concerns. A document blames Pfizer and Moderna vaccines for the rise in deaths. The Australian Senate rejected investigating excess deaths. Politicians pushing vaccines are accused of lying about the threat of COVID. Lockdowns were unnecessary, and the vaccine rollout was called a theater.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: During the COVID era, we had politicians standing on platforms daily reciting the number of infections.
Speaker 1: There's 41 new cases.
Speaker 0: The The number of people who had died from COVID.
Speaker 1: There are now 675 Victorians who have passed away.
Speaker 0: And there was all this apparent concern.
Speaker 1: We, of course, send our sincere condolences and sympathies.
Speaker 0: But now when we've got 29,000 excess deaths, which greatly exceeds the number of purported COVID deaths, nobody wishes to address what's the cause.
Speaker 2: Every one of these deaths is a person who would not have died if it had been a normal year with a normal number of deaths.
Speaker 0: The the formidable document which AMPS put together, Too Many Dead, addressing the excess deaths which only started to occur in Australia just after the introduction of the the mRNA products of Pfizer and Moderna. The book Too Many Dead with so many prominent authors involved clearly points the finger at these drugs.
Speaker 2: So far, the ABS estimates that there have been 29,601 excess deaths from March 21 to August 2023.
Speaker 3: The Australian Senate has voted down a motion to investigate excess deaths.
Speaker 2: I gave all my colleagues in this place the opportunity to help us investigate the causes of our excess death rate. Now sadly, my motion was defeated, and 35 of my fellow senators in this place, in my opinion, stood in the way of truth and justice.
Speaker 0: If you start as a politician saying sorry, recognizing literally 100 of 1000 of Australians who have been severely injured from these things, let alone those who died from the vaccines, the non vaccines. Well, then the next logical question is, what was the cause then? The world will is engaged in the largest, clinical trial, the largest global vaccination trial ever. And if you see and acknowledge the injuries as a consequence of the vaccines, you're the government that coerced people to take those vaccines.
Speaker 1: We're gonna lock out people who are not vaccinated.
Speaker 0: Well, then you've already got the nexus for legal claims against the government. So the government's running from a multimillion dollar lawsuit.
Speaker 2: But, you
Speaker 3: know, we kept being told, okay. Well, even if there is a lot of excess deaths, even if that is true, it would have been far worse if we hadn't given everybody a rushed vaccine.
Speaker 0: If you hear any Australian politician put that position forward, that's essentially a lie. Epidemiological studies, which were known to all governments in early 2020 acknowledging that COVID or SARS CoV 2 represented no greater threat than a severe influenza season. We've had those countless times. Every few years, there is a severe influenza season, which takes out generally the older generations.
Speaker 1: Nine deaths. These include 1 female in her seventies, 1 female and 3 males in their eighties, 1 female and 3 males in their nineties.
Speaker 0: If we let that severe influenza season just run its course, we would have got through it within 6 months. It would have been finished before the end of 2020. Instead, they locked us down and told us all these boogeyman stories about how SARS CoV 2 was an imminent threat to your life and existence. Stay in your house. Stay in your house until we get a vaccine and then you can come out after you've taken the vaccine.
That was a complete theater.
Too Many Dead 2023
Australia is in the middle of an excessive rise in deaths, post-pandemic there has been a sharp increase in deaths with the government looking the other way. AMPS has decided to do their job for them
amps.redunion.com.au
Spectator TV Australia | Friday 16 February, 2024 - 2024 - ADH TV
The Spectator Australia offers provocative, insightful, and engaging writing from contrarian, conservative thinkers. From high life to low, outraged to amused, local to international, The Spectator is always stimulating and enjoyable.
Guests: Alexander Voltz, Jullian Gillespie hosted by Alexandra Marshall
Watch ‘Spectator TV’ live and on demand at ADH TV, Fridays 9PM AEDT.
watch.adh.tv
reSee.it AI Summary
There have been 139,000 adverse event reports for Covid vaccines in Australia, surpassing reports for all other vaccines combined. The data has been collated and presented on the website http://OpenDAEN.info, making it easier to interpret and visualize. Volunteer researchers have dedicated hundreds of hours to cross-matching the data with FIO reports. Watch the full episode on SpectatorTV for more information.
@adhtvaus - ADH TV
There have been over 139,000 adverse event reports for Covid vaccines in Australia. More than all other adverse event reports for all the other vaccines combined. http://OpenDAEN.info is unpacking the overwhelming Covid vaccine adverse reports data: "A group of volunteer researchers have been working on http://OpenDAEN.info for years. Hundreds of hours have been spent to collate data, cross match it with FIO reports with information about batch numbers and cases. It's been presented on a website making the data easier to interpret and easier to visualise." Says @JulesSladden with @ellymelly on SpectatorTV (@SpectatorOz). Video by @TheMilkBarTV FULL EPISODE: https://watch.adh.tv/the-week-in-60-minutes-australia-2/season:2/videos/the-week-in-60-minutes-australia-ep2-spectator-tv-wednesday-7-feb-2024 @CKellyUAP @MRobertsQLD @SenatorRennick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Open Dane is a website that presents adverse event reports for COVID-19 vaccines in an easy-to-understand format. Volunteer researchers have spent countless hours collecting and analyzing data, including batch numbers and cases. The website aims to demystify the overwhelming number of adverse event reports, which currently stands at over 139,000, surpassing all other vaccine reports combined. Critics who argue that the high number of adverse events is expected due to the widespread vaccination overlook the fact that childhood vaccines have been administered for decades with significantly lower adverse event rates. The website hopes to encourage further research into the patterns and safety signals revealed by the data. The initial claims of the vaccines being safe and effective were made without sufficient evidence, as there were known and unknown risks associated with them. The website provides valuable data to investigate these safety concerns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Open Dane is basically a representation of the TGA's adverse event reports for the COVID 19 injections. A group of volunteer researchers who have been working on this for the last year or 2 and basically they have done 100 and 100 of hours of volunteer work to collate this data, but not only that, cross match it with freedom of information reports that had info extra information about batch numbers and cases, and it's being presented on a website which is making the data Easier to interpret, easier to visualize, and basically demystifying all the adverse event reports that have been submitted, of which there are over a 100 and 39,000. It's more than all of the adverse event reports for all of the other vaccines combined.
Speaker 1: I've seen people Commenting online, trying to explain the high figure of COVID vaccines by saying, well, everyone was given a COVID vaccine. So it's only natural for there to be so many adverse reports, but correct me if I'm wrong, Julie, but hasn't pretty much All Australian kids been getting childhood vaccines since the eighties. How does their arguments stack up against the actual statistics from other medications and particularly vaccines that have been in in high use over many decades.
Speaker 0: Only need to go to, for example, the Western Australian vaccine safety report 2022, which basically showed that the rate of adverse events per 100,000 doses given had exponentially increased, and that's the words of the report, by 24 times. And that pattern has been replicated around the world. And the the people who put this website together. That's really what they wanted to do, lift the lid and show, well, this is what we have here. People can do their own private study and have a look at at the statistics, but also maybe hopefully other researchers will be actually looking to see the patterns because there are some patterns there in the adverse event reports that have appeared so we know where to look.
Speaker 1: Would you say now, looking back, when those press conferences were made, And when the mandates were implemented and we had medical authorities and politicians telling us that these vaccines were Safe and effective. Safe. It's effective. Safe. It's effective.
It's safe as effective. Safe and effective. These are safe and effective products. Was Was that a 100% truthful, and was it known at the time that there were big question marks hanging over the safety of these vaccines?
Speaker 0: At best, they Could all they could ever say when these came out was that we don't know. When we find out that the injections weren't even tested for transmission by Pfizer, well, We all soon discovered how effective they were. And as for the safety, we use time in medicine a lot, and that passage of time had not passed for us to weed out what the adverse events are going to be. There were a lot of known risks, a lot of unknown risks and unknown unknown risks. And, when you put all those things together, especially with the paucity of data that we had, I don't think There was any way they could say that they were safe, but now we have data that shows us that we need to go and look at these safety signals and see exactly what's happened, especially with the significant rates of adverse event reports there are on the website.
The Week in 60 Minutes Australia: Ep2 | Spectator TV - Wednesday 7 Feb, 2024 - 2024 - ADH TV
The Spectator Australia offers provocative, insightful, and engaging writing from contrarian, conservative thinkers. From high life to low, outraged to amused, local to international, The Spectator is always stimulating and enjoyable.
Guests: Nick Hossack, Kevin Andrews & Dr Julie Sladden hosted by Alexandra Marshall
Watch ‘The Week in 60 Minutes Australia’ live and on demand at ADH TV, Wednesdays 9PM AEDT.
watch.adh.tv
reSee.it AI Summary
The Office of the Gene Technology Regulator allowed experimental mRNA vaccines into Australia without providing safety and efficacy advice. Their reasoning? The vaccines were produced overseas. Consequently, numerous Australians suffered injuries or died from the vaccines, while those who refused faced job loss and restricted freedoms. Astonishing. Watch the video for more details.
@adhtvaus - ADH TV
The Office of the Gene Technology Regulator allowed experimental mRNA vaccines to be released into Australia without offering any advice regarding the vaccines' safety and efficacy. The OGTR's explanation? The vaccines were made overseas, not here. Thousands of Australians were subsequently seriously injured or killed by the vaccines while people who refused to take them were sacked from their jobs and denied basic freedoms. You can't make this stuff up. From @SpectatorOz TV with @ellymelly. Brilliant video editing by @TheMilkBarTV WATCH: https://watch.adh.tv/spectator-tv/season:3/videos/spectator-tv-australia-friday-10-november-2034
Video Transcript AI Summary
In April 2022, the OGTR stated their role in assessing the risk of gene technology. In February 2023, Senator Renick asked if they had received any requests for advice on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. The OGTR responded that they had not because mRNA vaccines were not regulated as they did not involve genetic modification. However, in October 2023, Senator Renick quoted information from Pfizer's website, stating that gene therapies involve introducing new genetic material, which the mRNA vaccines do. The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy also classified mRNA vaccines as gene therapy. The TGA's documents confirmed the use of DNA in the manufacturing process. This contradiction suggests that the mRNA vaccines are gene technology and are being transported and administered without proper licensing, posing a significant problem.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was in April 2022 the OGTR office of the gene technology regulator said.
Speaker 1: So our role in terms of the risk assessment, we look at how it's, if it's imported the authorizations for import, storage, transport and disposal.
Speaker 0: Then in February 2023, Senator Renick asked them.
Speaker 2: Do you have any evidence where the the secretary has written to you asking, risk? For advice on the safety and efficacy of the COVID nineteen vaccines.
Speaker 0: And they said
Speaker 1: no because the mRNA vaccines scenes were not regulated.
Speaker 0: Because they did not involve
Speaker 1: any step of genetic modification.
Speaker 0: But then in October of 2023 senator Renick was throwing the last question of the day in senate estimates I mean seriously you could not make this stuff up senator ready quoted information of Pfizer's own website.
Speaker 2: Gene therapies are a delicate intentional process encapsulating the desired gene. Risk. Manufacturing gene therapies is challenging and it requires certain steps including transfection.
Speaker 0: Also the American study of gene and cell therapy.
Speaker 2: Because the vaccine introduces new genetic material into cells for a short period of time to introduce antibodies, It is a gene therapy as defined by the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy.
Speaker 0: And, the TGA's own AUSPA documents.
Speaker 2: The proposed commercial scale manufacturing process includes use of linearized plasma DNA template for mRNA production.
Speaker 0: Risk And went through a series of steps explaining how these mRNA vaccines fall under the description of definition of risk.
Speaker 2: So we've now got Pfizer themselves to admit that the mRNA vaccines were gene therapy. The American in society of gene and cell therapy admits the mRNA vaccines, the gene therapy. And we've got the TGA themselves admit the DNA was used in the manufacturing process.
Speaker 0: And what Doctor Beulah, who was speaking on behalf of the OGTR said was.
Speaker 1: If indeed the mRNA was being manufactured here and it's correct that gene technology was used in the modification of the mRNA then under the Gene Technology Act an approval would have been required for that manufacturing step. But
Speaker 0: then goes on to say.
Speaker 1: Gene technology doesn't reach into manufacturing in other countries.
Speaker 0: If you remember back to what I said further previously about what happened in February 2022 the OGTR said they were responsible for
Speaker 1: the import, storage transport and disposal.
Speaker 0: So there's been a clear contradiction in what they've said And it appears to me in this conversation that they've admitted that these mRNA injections are actually gene technology which then leads you to Well if these are gene technology and they're being transported and imported and basically flying around this country and into people's bodies risk? They're currently doing it without a licence.
Speaker 3: I think that these institutions rely on it being so complicated, so many acronyms that people lose track of what is really being said. Risk And essentially, we have a medication in this country that perhaps and potentially has been given out unlicensed or at least not properly licensed and that is a big problem.
Spectator TV Australia | Friday 10 November, 2034 - 2023 - ADH TV
The Spectator Australia offers provocative, insightful, and engaging writing from contrarian, conservative thinkers. From high life to low, outraged to amused, local to international, The Spectator is always stimulating and enjoyable.
Guests: Rocco Loiacono, Roger Pescott, Brendan Millane, Dr Julie Sladden hosted by Alexandra Marshall
watch.adh.tv
@adhtvaus - ADH TV
Former federal MP @CKellyUAP was comprehensively vilified and lost his seat for saying #ivermectin could treat #Covid. But his critics, including Brett Sutton and @PKelly_CBR, are conspicuously quiet now that the ban on Ivermectin has been quietly lifted by the TGA. From the Alan Jones Show: https://watch.adh.tv/alan-jones-full-shows/season:3/videos/dr-jay-vidanage-byron-bailey-tuesday-12-september-2023…
Video Transcript AI Summary
Craig Kelly, former federal member for Hughes, faced backlash for promoting the effectiveness of cheap drugs like Ivermectin. He was criticized for suggesting these drugs were more effective than vaccines, which raised concerns about public confidence in the vaccination program. The cost of vaccines was a point of discussion, with assurances that they would be provided for free. The suppression of Ivermectin was attributed to its potential threat to the emergency use authorizations for experimental vaccines. The need for a discussion on medical research incentives was highlighted, as well as the large amount of research supporting Ivermectin's effectiveness. Despite the Therapeutic Goods Administration initially discouraging its use, Ivermectin is now allowed to be prescribed off-label. Craig Kelly faced personal attacks and defamation, leading to the ruin of his political career.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Remember when Craig Kelly, the then federal member for Hughes, produced proof of the effectiveness of cheap drugs like Ivermectin?
Speaker 1: Study published last year. Of the 788 that took the Ivermectin treatment, how many Contracted COVID. It was 0.
Speaker 0: He was vilified and called a foghorn of ignorance. Craig Kelly is a dangerous menace. Craig Kelly is a menace. And a threat to the nation's COVID response. Big pharma, you see, had all the answers, vaccination.
He's claimed That these drugs are more effective than vaccines. What does that do for confidence in the vaccination program which is about to be rolled out across Australia? But to this day, we've never been told what the big pharmaceutical companies were paid. The poor MUD taxpayer was told that everything was free.
Speaker 1: If you are, Receiving a vaccine, it should come at no cost to you.
Speaker 2: Free vaccine.
Speaker 1: Free booster. It's voluntary, free, and the best way to protect you and your community.
Speaker 0: Why a cheap, safe drug was actively suppressed because it threatened the emergency use authorizations for all experimental vaccines, an industry worth about $100,000,000,000.
Speaker 2: We need to really discussion about how we do medical research because the system as it is has incentives for companies like Pfizer and and Moderna To make a fortune out of drugs that can be patented. The drugs that fall out of patent, they become unusable. Here's what happened to Ivermectin.
Speaker 0: Joe, I said earlier there should be a Royal Commission. You've got no hope of getting that because every political party subscribed to this disgraceful demonization of hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin.
Speaker 3: They think that everything will be solved by taking a horse deworming tablet, Ivermectin, that gives that gives you the runs and that put Some people in hospital. There are
Speaker 1: there are many trials that have been done in Ivermectin. Not a single one of them have shown them to be effective.
Speaker 2: Now to 96 studies From 1,000 scientists, 135,000 patients involved in these studies in 27 countries. So the amount of research on this is enormous.
Speaker 0: Well, now, of course, the Therapeutic Goods Administration says, oh, Ivermectin's okay.
Speaker 2: And yes, after 6 28 day ban for no medical reason that anyone can name, these trained TGA has decided that our doctors are now allowed to prescribe Ivermectin off label just like they have for decades with no issues and no problems. It's one of the safest drugs.
Speaker 0: Of the attacks on Craig Kelly for so arguing, drawing attention to all these studies. Professor Clancy said, it's very sad when people start dragging the guy apart. It's bad enough when you drag someone apart on facts, but if you do it without facts or understanding what the argument is, it is disappointing. Well, Craig Kelly was cancelled, vilified and defamed. His career political career ruined.
Speaker 1: Ivermectin, drug which the Therapeutic Goods Administration has asked, Australians not to use. You come into this chamber. I wanna silence debate on one of the most important issues ever facing our country. Shame on you.