TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @aldamu_jo
reSee.it AI Summary
40 minors testified they were raped and trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. Kash Patel testified there’s no credible information he trafficked minors. The poster urges perjury charges against Patel. A reply links to an unrelated video.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
40 minors gave sworn testimonies that they’d been raped & trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. Kash Patel Under Oath: “There’s no credible information that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked minors” FBI Kash Patel needs to be charged with perjury. https://t.co/nRoFI7kkWp
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is no credible information available. None. If there were credible information, I would have brought the case yesterday, specifically the allegation that he trafficked to other individuals. The information we currently have is limited, and therefore the conclusion based on the available material is that there is no one implicated. So, to restate the conclusion using the information at hand, the answer is no one. This assessment is based on the information we have, in the files, in the case file. Okay.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is no credible information. None. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals. And the in information we have, again, is limited. So the answer is no one?
For the information that we have. In the files? In the case file. Okay.
@dale_dick95059 - Dale Dick
@aldamu_jo https://odysee.com/@JediSleeveEyeCollege:4/Europa---The-Last-Battle-(2017):5
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
Donald Trump's spiritual leader, Robert Morris, has just been sentenced to only six months in prison for sexually abusing a 12-year-old girl We are ruled by Pedophiles https://t.co/CZPpZQEBM3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 opens with a moment of disbelief, saying “What?” as if reacting to something unexpected or unresolved. The speaker then shifts to a hopeful note, stating that they are “just hoping that it is over,” indicating a desire for closure or an end to the situation at hand. Amid that hope, there is a sense of reassurance or confidence in the outcome, as the speaker adds, “I feel good about it.”
Following this, the speaker turns to inquiry, prompting curiosity about the forces or circumstances behind what has occurred by asking, “What’s behind this?” This question suggests a search for underlying causes, motivations, or explanations that might lie beneath the surface of the current situation.
The speaker continues to probe emotionally and perceptually with another question, “What does this feel like?” which invites reflection on the subjective experience or sensation associated with whatever is transpiring. This line of inquiry emphasizes a desire to understand the tangible or experiential aspects of the event or process.
Toward the end, the speaker conveys uncertainty about their own expressive capacity, declaring, “I don’t know that I have a word today.” This admission implies a momentary lack of vocabulary, speech, or perhaps certainty about how to articulate their thoughts or feelings in that moment.
Throughout these lines, Speaker 0 conveys a blend of anticipation, optimism, curiosity, and a momentary hesitance in expressing themselves. The progression moves from a reaction to a hoped-for ending, to a confident feeling about the outcome, to a deeper inquiry into causes and experiences, and finally to a brief incapacity to express precisely how they feel in words at that moment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What? I'm just hoping that it is over. I feel good about it. What's behind this? What does this feel like?
I don't know that I have a word today.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
Kash Patel Under Oath: "I’ve never heard of Stew Peters" Kash made eight on-air appearances on his podcast. FBI Kash Patel needs to be charged with perjury. https://t.co/ClW7DEXwkW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they are familiar with Stu Peters, and notes that Peters “made eight separate appearances on his podcast.” The conversation then shifts to Kash Patel, with Speaker 1 thanking him for making the time to be there. Throughout the exchange, all parties—Speaker 0, Speaker 1, and Kash Patel—exchange thanks, repeatedly thanking each other for being present. The overall transcript is a brief, courteous acknowledgment of Stu Peters and a short introduction of Kash Patel, punctuated by multiple expressions of appreciation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're familiar with the Stu Peters? Does that name ring a bell? I'm sorry. What is Are you familiar with mister Stu Peters? Not off the top of my head.
He made eight separate appearances on his podcast.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for being here. We appreciate it.
Speaker 0: Stu. Always love coming on your show.
Speaker 1: Kash Patel, thank you so much for making the time to be here with us. We appreciate it.
Speaker 0: Thanks, Stu.
Speaker 1: Appreciate it. Thank you so much for being here. We appreciate it.
Speaker 0: Thanks, Stu. Appreciate it. See
Speaker 1: you soon. I gotta go, Kash. Thank you so much for being here. We really appreciate it. Thanks.
Up against a heartbreak here. Thank you so much for being here. We appreciate it.
Speaker 0: Thanks so much. Appreciate it, Stu.
Speaker 1: Kash Patel, thank you so much for being here. We appreciate it.
Speaker 0: Thanks so much, Stu. Appreciate
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Rep. Thomas Massie exposed a hidden Epstein list and accused Kash Patel of lying. Massie says the FBI holds files naming 20 others tied to Epstein’s sex trafficking, including a high-profile official, and that they had the list all along. Release the names now.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
Rep. Thomas Massie just exposed a hidden Epstein list and called out Kash Patel for lying to the American people. Massie says the FBI is sitting on files that name 20 other men tied to Epstein’s sex trafficking operation; including a high-profile government official. They had this list the whole time. The cover up is collapsing. Release. The. Names. Now.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents two contrasting points. First, it states that there is no credible information that he trafficked them to anyone else. Second, it notes that, according to victims who cooperated with the FBI in that investigation, documents in FBI possession, your possession, detail at least 20 men to whom Jeffrey Epstein trafficked victims.
Among those named is mister Jess Staley, CEO of Barclays Bank, indicating that Epstein trafficked victims to him. The list also includes at least 19 other individuals, spanning a range of professions and high-profile positions. The described categories of people named in the documents include a Hollywood producer worth a few hundred million dollars, a royal prince, a high-profile individual in the music industry, a very prominent banker, a high-profile government official, a high-profile former politician, an owner of a car company in Italy, a rock star, and a magician. The enumeration further specifies that at least six billionaires are among those listed, including a billionaire from Canada.
In summary, the transcript claims that while there is no credible information of trafficking to other parties, FBI-linked documents enumerate a network of at least 20 men connected to Epstein’s trafficking of victims, with Jess Staley explicitly identified as one of the recipients. The rest of the named individuals span diverse and prestigious sectors—entertainment, royalty, finance, government, politics, automotive business, music, magic, and extreme wealth—highlighting a broad and varied set of possible associations. The allegations are presented as claims from victims who cooperated with the FBI, and the list is described as detailing those individuals to whom Epstein trafficked victims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You replied, according to the transcript, there is no credible information that he trafficked them to anyone else. According to victims who cooperated with the FBI in that investigation, these documents in FBI possession, your possession, detail at least 20 men, including mister Jess Staley, CEO of Barclays Bank, who Jeffrey Epstein trafficked victims to. That list also includes at least 19 other individuals, one Hollywood producer worth a few $100,000,000, one royal prince, one high profile individual in the music industry, one very prominent banker, one high profile government official, one high profile former politician, one owner of a car company in Italy, one rock star, one magician, at least six billionaires, including a billionaire from Canada.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
Benjamin Netanyahu in the 80's: "Israel owns and controls the U.S." "The U.S. is not a unified block. We own the senate, the congress, and we have a record strong Jewish lobby on our side. We have a strong influence over the general support. America won't force us into anything."
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
U.S. State Department official Stacey Gilbert Quit her 20 year career over a report. She said it was falsified to absolve Israel of war crimes and Justify Continued US Weapons sales to Israel . https://t.co/gZ4hhoen5p
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a discussion about a Biden administration report on Gaza, Speaker 1 recounts Her resignation over what she perceived as amisleading conclusion. She says, "I said that report will haunt us. And it does, and it haunts me. The determination that Israel is not blocking humanitarian assistance is patently, demonstrably false."
In April, Stacey Gilbert was asked for her input on the administration’s report regarding whether Israel was committing war crimes in Gaza. Speaker 0 notes that Gilbert was asked for input, and Gilbert confirms she advised that the conclusion was not the case. She states, "The subject matter experts were removed, and the report was moved up to a higher level. We were told you will see the report when it is released publicly."
When the report was released, it "just doesn't include what you had to say?" Gilbert responds, "I wasn't sure I read that correctly. I read it again and I sent an email then that I would resign as a result of that."
Overall, the exchange highlights Gilbert’s claim that the report claimed Israel was not blocking humanitarian assistance, despite her advice to the contrary, the removal of subject matter experts, the report being elevated, and her subsequent decision to consider resigning after the public release did not reflect her input.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you remember what you write in your resignation email?
Speaker 1: I said that report will haunt us. And it does, and it haunts me. The determination that Israel is not blocking humanitarian assistance is patently, demonstrably false.
Speaker 0: In April, Stacey Gilbert was asked for her input on a Biden administration report on whether Israel was committing war crimes in Gaza.
Speaker 1: I was shocked to see that it said in very clear terms, it is our determination that Israel is not blocking humanitarian assistance.
Speaker 0: You had advised that that wasn't the case. Is that correct?
Speaker 1: Yes. The subject matter experts were removed, and the report was moved up to a higher level. We were told you will see the report when it is released publicly.
Speaker 0: And then the report comes out and just doesn't include what you had to say?
Speaker 1: I wasn't sure I read that correctly. I read it again and I sent an email then that I would resign as a result of that.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
“Netanyahu is boasting he can bring the US along with whatever he does" IN a leaked video from 2001, brags about the control he has over the U. S. and how he can push the United States to do whatever he wants. Bibi has a lot success in pushing America. https://t.co/imo6oMyekg
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0, Speaker 1, Speaker 2, Speaker 3, Speaker 4, and Speaker 5 exchange views on U.S. policy and Middle East conflicts. The dialogue opens with Benjamin Netanyahu boasting that he can bring the U.S. along with whatever he does, followed by Speaker 1 asserting, “America … can be easily pushed, pushed to the right direction.” The exchange notes that, even if that were true, it is insulting to hear aloud, yet acknowledges that “BB has had a lot of success in pushing America.”
Speaker 2 asserts, “If you take out Saddam, I guarantee that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region.” In contrast, Speaker 3 announces, “My fellow citizens, at this hour, American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to undermine Saddam Hussein's ability to wage war.” Speaker 2 adds, “Obviously, we'd to see a regime change, at least I would, in Iran just as I would like to see in Iraq.”
Speaker 4 states, “Short time ago, the US military carried out massive precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the Iranian regime.” Speaker 2 further claims, “Iraq, Iran, and Libya. Today, I authorize authorize the armed forces of the United States to begin a limited military action in Libya.” The repetition of “authorize authorize” appears in the transcript, emphasizing the declaration to commence action in Libya.
Speaker 5 contends that the figure has been moving around the Middle East, his region, and his own country, “telling people point blank, just stating it, I control The United States. I control Donald Trump. I'm an American. You can't treat it it's too humiliating. I can't handle that, and I shouldn't have to put up with that.” The speakers collectively discuss U.S. involvement, potential regime changes, and the perceived influence of leadership over American actions, highlighting assertions of control, imminent military operations, and strategic aims in Iraq, Iran, and Libya.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Benjamin Netanyahu is boasting that he can bring The US along with whatever he does.
Speaker 1: America Especially today with America. I know what America is. America is something that can be easily pushed, pushed to the right direction.
Speaker 0: Wow. America can be easily pushed. Even if that is true, it's insulting to hear out loud. And to be fair, BB has had a lot of success in pushing America.
Speaker 2: If you take out Saddam, I guarantee that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region.
Speaker 3: My fellow citizens, at this hour, American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to undermine Saddam Hussein's ability to wage war.
Speaker 2: Obviously, we'd to see a regime change, at least I would, in Iran just as I would like to see in Iraq.
Speaker 4: Short time ago, the US military carried out massive precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the Iranian regime.
Speaker 2: Iraq, Iran, and Libya. Today, I authorize authorize the armed forces of the United States to begin a limited military action in Libya.
Speaker 5: He's running around the Middle East, his region, and his own country and telling people point blank, just stating it, I control The United States. I control Donald Trump. I'm an American. You can't treat it's too humiliating. I can't handle that, and I shouldn't have to put up with that.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
“A foreign leader bragging about how he's censoring Americans. This guy runs a country of 9 million people that's totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist. & here he is on camera saying, anyone who opposes me in the United States, is a Nazi...” Tucker Carlson on Netanyahu
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses what they call the “woke right,” highlighting a claim made by a foreign leader who allegedly bragged about censoring Americans. The speaker emphasizes the irony of a country with about 9,000,000 people that is described as totally dependent on U.S. tax dollars to exist, while this leader says that Americans who oppose more aid to Israel or opposition to getting drawn into a war with Iran are not simply mistaken or wrong—these opponents are “a Nazi, part of the woke Reich.” The speaker stresses that the foreign leader would fix the issue by preventing Americans in the United States from hearing the other side.
The narrative then shifts to actions the speaker alleges are being pushed here at home: pressuring Congress to force a sale of TikTok, which is described as a real effort, “TikTok. TikTok. Number one.” The speaker expresses a hope that this sale goes through due to its potentially consequential impact, framing it as part of a broader assault on free speech.
Attention is drawn to the need to talk to Elon Musk, with the implication that free speech is central to the United States, described as “really the only thing that sets us apart from any other country on Earth.” The speaker contrasts this with the foreign head of state, reiterating that the foreign leader is “totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist” and is proposing or engaging in some form of “secret pressure campaign on Elon Musk to censor X because it bothers Israel.”
Throughout, the speaker underscores a conflict over speech, censorship, and national interest, asserting that free speech is foundational to American identity and warning against foreign attempts to suppress or control American discourse, including outside interventions in private platforms and the shaping of opinion through perceived censorship. The overall message centers on opposing censorship by a foreign leader and defending American free speech principles in the face of international pressure and domestic policy movements aimed at limiting access to opposing viewpoints.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Talk about the woke right. He said, I call it the woke right. It's almost unbelievable that he said that on camera. Imagine. This is a foreign leader bragging about how he's censoring Americans.
Again, this guy runs a country of 9,000,000 people that's totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist. And here he is on camera saying, anyone who opposes me in The United States who opposes more aid to Israel or opposes getting sucked into war with Iran, which does not serve American interest, that person is not simply mistaken or wrong. I'm not gonna bother to explain why that person is wrong. That person is a Nazi, part of the woke Reich. A Nazi.
And the only way to fix it is by preventing Americans in the last country on earth with guaranteed freedom of speech. Prevent Americans from hearing the other side. And so we push congress to force a TikTok sale, which is true, by the way. What? TikTok.
TikTok. TikTok. Number one. Number one. And I hope it goes through because it's it can be consequential.
And we need to talk to Elon. You know? So we have to talk to Elon. Free speech is central to the entire idea of America. In fact, it's really the only thing that sets us apart from any other country on Earth.
And here's this guy, a foreign head of state, who, let me restate, is totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist, is saying Americans don't have that right, and he's gonna do some kind of secret pressure campaign on Elon Musk to censor x because it bothers Israel?
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
A city over 5,775 years old was wiped out live on air by a 77-year-old colonizer! https://t.co/Cg2Q617cdn
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
Israeli soldiers desecrate Church , Convert it into a Public Bathroom https://t.co/teCdmvxcGi
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the village of Sarada, the speaker asserts that the church has been absolutely desecrated by Israeli forces. The scene described includes graffiti on the wall, which is noted but deemed less offensive than other damage observed inside the church.
The speaker highlights that pews have been arranged as if for soldiers to sleep there. There is trash scattered on the floor, including toilet paper, water bottles, and various condiments.
Among the most offensive findings, the speaker emphasizes the desecration of religious figurines. Jesus is described as having his head cut off, with residents telling the speaker that this appearance seems intentional and not the result of an explosion or fighting in the village. The Virgin Mary is noted with her face seemingly cut off as well. Additionally, Baby Jesus is described as having his arm cut off.
Throughout the account, residents’ impressions are used to characterize the acts as deliberate desecrations tied to the reported presence or actions of Israeli forces, alongside the described graffiti, trash, and the use of the pews for soldiers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Village of Sarada, and I wanna show you how badly this church has been absolutely desecrated by the Israeli forces. You can see here that there's a bunch of graffiti on the wall, but I think, actually, that's probably the least offensive thing that we have seen in this church. You can see that the pews have been put together seemingly for soldiers to sleep there. There's also trash across the floor. There's toilet paper, water bottles, condiments, whatever you'd like.
But I think one of the most offensive things that we have found in this church is the desecration of religious figurines. So this would have been Jesus. His head is cut off there. Residents tell me that that looks intentional, not part of an explosion or any fighting that may have taken place in this village. This is the Virgin Mary.
Her face seems to have been cut off. You can also see baby Jesus over there, his arm cut off.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
“Were Israel not to exist, the United States of America would have to invent an Israel to protect her interests in the region.” Joe Biden, 1986. Genocide Joe https://t.co/iNITBg0yN0
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses U.S. policy in the Middle East and the posture of those who support Israel, arguing strongly that supporters in the United States should cease apologizing for backing Israel. They assert there is no need for an apology, declaring, “There’s no apology to be made.” This stance frames the U.S. relationship with Israel as clear-cut and essential, offering a provocative justification for continued support.
In advocating for unwavering backing, the speaker characterizes U.S. support for Israel as a decisive measure, calling it “the best $3,000,000,000 investment we make.” This claim positions aid to Israel as a strategic expenditure with substantial returns in terms of regional influence and security interests, suggesting that the economic commitment yields significant strategic benefits for the United States in the Middle East.
Building on this assertion, the speaker presents a hypothetical scenario to underscore the perceived indispensability of Israel to American interests. They state, “Were there not an Israel, The United States Of America would have to invent an Israel.” This statement implies that, in the absence of an existing state in the region aligned with U.S. interests, Washington would face the dilemma of creating a state in order to protect those interests, highlighting the perceived necessity of having a stable, allied presence in the area.
Further reinforcing the argument, the speaker repeats the notion of necessity with a direct formulation: “The United States would have to go out and invent an Israel.” This reiteration emphasizes the belief that Israel serves a critical role in safeguarding American regional objectives, to the extent that its existence is considered indispensable enough to warrant creation if it did not already exist.
Across these points, the core message is a vehement defense of sustained U.S. support for Israel, framed as both morally clear (no apology) and practically essential (a valuable investment with strategic weight). The speaker combines a repudiation of criticism with a hypothetical justification for the centrality of Israel to American policy in the Middle East, asserting that Israel’s existence or creation is tied to protecting United States interests in the region.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If we look at The Middle East, I think it's about time we stop those of us who support as most of us do, Israel and this body for apologizing for our support for Israel. There's no apology to be made. None. It is the best $3,000,000,000 investment we make. Were there not an Israel, The United States Of America would have to invent an Israel to protect her interest in the region.
The United States would have to go out and invent an Israel.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
Benjamin Netanyahu in the 80's: "Israel owns and controls the U.S." "The U.S. is not a unified block. We own the senate, the congress, and we have a record strong Jewish lobby on our side.We have a strong influence over the general support. America won't force us into anything."
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
The speech that got JFK killed? ‘I’m talking about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life worth living, with the kind that enables men and nations to grow and hope, and build a better life for their children. Not merely peace for Americans, peace for all men and women....
Video Transcript AI Summary
Peace is the necessary rational end of rational men, and the pursuit of peace, while less dramatic than war, is the most urgent task. He urges recognizing differences but directing attention to common interests and to making the world safe for diversity. 'We all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children's futures, and we are all mortal.' The peace he seeks is 'genuine peace,' not 'Pax Americana,' not 'the peace of the grave' or 'the security of the slave.' It should be 'the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living' and 'not merely peace for Americans, but peace for all men and women, not merely peace in our time, peace in all time.' Khrushchev called it 'the finest speech by an American president since FDR' and said, 'I wanna make peace with your president.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I speak of peace, therefore, as the necessary rational end of rational men. I realize the pursuit of peace is not as dramatic as the pursuit of war, and frequently the words of the pursuers fall on deaf ears, but we have no more urgent task. Let us not be blind to our differences, but let us also direct attention to our common interests and the means by which those differences can be resolved. And if we cannot end now our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. For in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet.
We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children's futures, and we are all mortal. That is the most important topic on Earth, peace. What kind of a peace do I mean, and what kind of a peace do we seek? Not a Pax Americana, enforced on the world by American weapons of war, not the peace of the grave or the security of the slave.
I am talking about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living, and the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and build a better life for their children, not merely peace for for Americans, but peace for all men and women, not merely peace in our time, peace in all time.
Speaker 1: And what is amazing, absolutely amazing, amazing, is is that that Khrushchev Khrushchev heard heard it, it, was carried away, summoned The US envoy, Kennedy's envoy to Moscow, April Harriman, and said this is the finest speech by an American president since FDR. I wanna make peace with your president.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
After attacking eight countries this month alone and assassinating Charlie Kirk on American soil, Netanyahu is received with full honors by an American Congress that Israel completely controls. Shame on you!!! https://t.co/muwxg5NkQc
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a leaked video from 2001 where Netanyahu discusses intentionally striking Palestinians to instill panic and fear, believing the world would remain silent. He also reveals how he manipulated the US to break the Oslo Accords, asserting that peace was never a viable option.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
A leaked video 2001 shows Netanyahu talking about how Israel intentionally strikes Palestinians 'We must hit the Palestinians hard ,take them to a state of panic and fear, and the world will not say anything.' How he deceived the US to break the Oslo Accords, and how Americans will always support Israel if it faces backlash. Peace was never an option.
reSee.it AI Summary
Charlie was assassinated using a modified camera, with the bullet entering above his left ear and exiting below his right neck, indicating a precise trajectory. The sophistication of this method suggests a calculated execution. The bullet's path aligns perfectly with the modified camera, likely fired from a distance. Shortly after the assassination, the camera was removed, pointing to an effort to conceal evidence.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
Charlie was assassinated with a modified camera. Looking at the camera position and seeing the trajectory of the bullet ( video below) tells us that the bullet was fired from that camera, entering above his left ear and exiting below his right neck. The sophistication of the action tells us who did it.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
Bullet trajectory that matches exactly as if it were fired with the modified camera, possibly at a distance. https://t.co/EnSOk4Q9mk
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
The camera is removed immediately after the assassination to cover up evidence. https://t.co/MWrLFi6Gp3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Safety team is on the scene. I just heard them say 'the active shooter Charlie Kirk has been shot.' 'Charlie Kirk got hit' is what the security detail just said. A message from the speaker's son said, 'My son just messaged me and says that Charlie Kirk I believe you need to leave.' Earlier, the speaker asked, 'Is this not fireworks? Sir, please sir. Hey.' The transcript depicts a security response to reported harm to Charlie Kirk, with the speaker relaying what the security detail reported and noting a directive for Charlie Kirk to leave. The tone conveys urgency and uncertainty.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is this not fireworks? Sir, please sir. Hey. Safety team is here. I just heard them say the active shooter Charlie Kirk has been shot.
Charlie Kirk got hit is what the what the security detail just said. My son just messaged me and says that Charlie Kirk I believe you need to leave.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
Charlie Kirk's Assassination The official FBI story is falling apart. The bullet caliber is wrong. The trajectory is wrong. The FBI keep trying to push the narrative but the online videos of the shooting are exposing the lies. It was a professional hit. https://t.co/HWXYz4kIrQ
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
Tyler James Robinson 62 years later. interviewer- “Did you shoot the president?” Lee Harvey Oswald- “No… I’m just a patsy.” https://t.co/YZxdNGsj3e
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I want to take a place. I like some legal representation. The police officers have not allowed me to to have any. I I don't know what this is all about. I got the money.
Sir? You're the president? I work in that building. Were you in the building at the time? Naturally, if I work in that building, yes, sir.
Back up, man. You're shooting presidents. No. They're taking me in because of the fact that I live in Missouri. I'm just a patsy.
President.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I want to take a place. I like some legal representation. The police officers have not allowed me to to have any. I I don't know what this is all about. I got the money.
Sir? You're the president? I work in that building. Were you in the building at the time? Naturally, if I work in that building, yes, sir.
Back up, man. You're shooting presidents. No. They're taking me in because of the fact that I live in Missouri. I'm just a patsy.
President.
reSee.it AI Summary
Charlie Kirk was assassinated by his own bodyguards, driven by his anti-Zionist views. I believe Mossad and the CIA were involved, reminiscent of JFK's assassination. There's also a video circulating that claims to show the real shooter.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
Charlie Kirk was assassinated by his own bodyguards. Inside Job motivated by his recent anti-Zionist political views. Mossad Israel and the CIA killed him, very similar to the assassination of JFK. https://t.co/djvrYSgFSU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker claims that while the rest of the country is told to beware, be cautious of 'Trans Tifas, the radical left, the lone gunman with the impossible rifle, or the killer,' the killer 'just as I originally thought, was point blank and amongst us the entire time, but more importantly amongst Charlie Kirk in his inner circle.' The speaker suggests that this contrast between warnings and the perceived presence of the killer implies a narrative dynamic in which the stated threats are superseded by the reality 'amongst Charlie Kirk in his inner circle.' It concludes that this demonstrates 'the nefarious ways of the Mossad of Israel control the narrative.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So while the rest of the country is told to beware, be cautious of the Trans Tifas, the radical left, the lone gunman with the impossible rifle, or the killer, just as I originally thought, was point blank and amongst us the entire time, but more importantly amongst Charlie Kirk in his inner circle. And that's how the nefarious ways of the Mossad of Israel control the narrative.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
97% of Israeli Jews cannot trace their DNA/lineage to ancient Palestine. They are not Semitic. But 80% of Palestinians carry trace lineage to ancient Palestine! They are Semitic and Israelis go around calling everyone antisemitic. https://t.co/xAV2T0Mzpq
Video Transcript AI Summary
If Benjamin Milakowski, a white dude who grew up in Philadelphia, whose ancestors are from Poland, can be an indigenous man from The Levant and become prime minister of a made up nation, you can be anybody that you wanna be. You just have to believe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Benjamin Milakowski, a white dude who grew up in Philadelphia, whose ancestors are from Poland, can be an indigenous man from The Levant and become prime minister of a made up nation, you can be anybody that you wanna be. You just have to believe.
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
Palestinian woman in the West Bank is arrested by Israeli police under a new terror law that outlaws passive social media use - because she shows sympathy to what’s happening in Gaza .She may spend up to 1 year in prison. Israel is a deeply depraved society. https://t.co/hNkFBDtODf
@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra
@BRICSinfo Palestine is the most well-documented genocide in history, yet the most denied. https://t.co/laurCGBime
