TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @allenanalysis

allenanalysis
Posted - March 20, 2026 at 6:11 AM
Saved - March 20, 2026 at 4:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m told Joe Kent, former NCTC director, says he won’t send young Americans to die on foreign battlefields and that we must tell leaders we don’t support this war. This isn’t a protestor or party line; he’s the one who assessed threats and claimed no Iran nuclear program, no imminent threat, and that Israel lobby pressure started the war. Now he asks us to call our reps. 14 Americans dead, $21B spent, and counting.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

The former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, Joe Kent, just issued a direct call to the American people: “I will not in good conscience send young men and women off to die on foreign battlefields. We’re at a critical juncture. We need to let our leaders hear that we do not support this war.” This is not a protester. This is not a Democrat. This is not the media. This is the man whose entire job was to assess threats to America. Who confirmed Iran had no nuclear program. Who confirmed there was no intelligence of an imminent threat. Who confirmed the war was started due to Israel lobby pressure. Who confirmed the investigation into Charlie Kirk’s death was stopped. Who resigned rather than be complicit. And now he is asking the American people to speak. Call your representative. Call your senator. Make them hear you. 14 Americans dead. $21 billion spent. An F-35 hit for the first time in history. Funerals now secret. Casualty counts hidden. Zero allied warships. The world walking away. The man who knew the most just told you what he thinks. Now it’s your turn.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Interviewer: This decision to follow your conscience, give us a little backstory. How did that happen? Guest: Without getting too much into detail, I did a long-form podcast with Tucker, laying out the entire politics of the issue. After serving twenty years, mostly deployed to the Middle East, fighting the wars over there, and seeing how our country had been lied to and brought down the wrong path in those wars, and that we were getting sucked into another one and that the American people didn't have the full story and our country did not have a vital national interest in this current fight. I said, hey, in good conscience, I can't do this because that was a promise I made to myself probably twenty plus years ago when I was deployed to Iraq. Once I realized after my first couple deployments that we weren't there for the reasons that our government told us we were there for, I said if it's ever my turn, if I'm ever an adult in this situation, I ever have a position of responsibility, I will not, in good conscience, send young men and women off to die on foreign battlefields. Interviewer: So we're Catholics here, baptized Catholic. We saw just on Sunday... Does it help you to have other members of your faith community or religious leaders speaking up on your behalf? Guest: It's been huge. I didn't think when I submitted my resignation it would get the traction or attention that you talked about. Having support from friends, family, but really, I’ve been asked a couple times, was it a hard decision to make? It wasn't made lightly. I put a lot of thought into it, and I had been thinking about it for quite some time. But having faith, I think I heard God's voice, that I was exactly where I was supposed to be and it was my time to take action, which made taking the action incredibly easy and liberating, making me feel like I was in the right spot. Interviewer: Do you have hope for America? And if you do, why so? Guest: I have a great deal of hope for America. This is a very exciting moment. The fact that we're seeing people who speak out on behalf of their faith or who are willing to speak truth to power, and that the people who support them can have a voice because of technology, which can be used for a lot of bad, but in connecting like-minded people and getting our word out, that technology is a very powerful weapon. The young people—the young men and women—there are plenty in this room; I was overwhelmed by the young folks who came up to shake my hand. I have hope for the next generation. As we head into this midterm season and as the war progresses in the next few weeks, the most important thing is to be on our knees and pray, but once we're up from our knees, we need to take action. Our leaders will hear us if we all speak out. We're at a critical juncture in the war in Iran; we must let our leaders hear that we do not support this war, that there is no vital national security interest, that we want to bring our troops home and work toward peace in that region, and that we do not want twenty plus more years of bloodletting. Heading into this next election cycle, demand from everyone, from every political party, go to your representatives, and say I will not vote for you if you are going to vote for the continuation of these wars overseas. If our country is attacked, we will attack; if there's an imminent attack, we will attack; if there's an actual threat, we will attack and fight that. However, we cannot continue to go down this path. We have to make that clear to our leaders. That's what gives me hope.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This decision to follow your conscience, give us a little backstory. How did that happen? Speaker 1: Without getting too much into detail, I just did a long form, podcast with with Tucker, kind of laid out the entire politics of of the issue. But look, after serving twenty years, mostly deployed to the Middle East, fighting the wars over there, and just seeing how our country had been lied to and brought down the wrong path in the in those wars and that we were getting sucked into another one and that the American people didn't have the full story and our country did not have a vital national interest in this current fight. I said, hey. I I, in good conscience, can't do this because that was a promise I made to myself probably twenty plus years ago when I was deployed to Iraq. Once I realized after my first couple deployments that we we weren't there for the reasons that our government told us we were there for, I said if it's ever my turn, if I'm ever an adult in this situation, I ever have a position of responsibility, I will not, in good conscience, send young men and women off to die on foreign battlefields. Speaker 0: So we're Catholics here, I believe you're baptized Catholic. We saw just on Sunday and this is so great to see because people are like, why a Catholic champion or why here? The holy father, the vicar of Christ on Earth, has been so strong and outspoken in recent comments talking about what Catholics should be worried about, the innocent people that are being hurt through all this. We he mentioned the Catholic priest that was killed, Father Pierre, by an attack, in Lebanon. Does it help you to have other members of your faith community or religious leaders speaking up on your behalf? Like, what's it been like to have that support from outside? Speaker 1: It's it's been huge. I quite frankly didn't think when I submitted my resignation it would get the the traction or the the attention that you you talked about. But having the support from from friends, family, but really, I I I've been asked a couple times, was it a hard decision to make? And it's definitely a decision I didn't make lightly. I I put a lot of thought into it, and and I had been thinking about it for quite some time. But having faith, I think I was able to hear god's voice. I was able to hear where I that I was exactly where I was supposed to be and it was my time to actually take action which made taking the action incredibly easy actually and actually made me feel very liberated and and like I'm in the right spot. So. Do Speaker 0: you have hope for America? And if you do, why so? Speaker 1: I I have a great deal of hope for America. I think this is a very exciting moment. I I I think the fact that we're seeing people who speak out on behalf of their faith or who are willing to speak truth to power and the fact that the people who support them are able to actually have a voice because of the technology, which obviously can be used for a lot of bad, but in the case of connecting like minded people and getting our word out, that technology is a very powerful weapon in our hand. And also the young people in this country, the young men, the young women, there are plenty here in this room, I was kind of overwhelmed when I got here tonight, especially by the young folks that came up and wanted to shake my hand. And so I have a lot of hope for the next generation. I think as we head into this midterm season and just as this war advances in the next couple of weeks, I I think, like you said, in your open, the most important thing we can do is be on our knees and pray. But once we're up from our knees, we need to take action. Our leaders will hear us if we all speak out. We're at a critical juncture in the war in Iran. We need to let our leaders hear that we do not support this war. We do not think there's a vital national security interest. We want to bring our troops home. We want to work towards peace in that region. We do not want twenty plus more years of bloodletting. And then as we head into this next election cycle, demand from everyone, from every political party, go to them, go to your representatives, and say I will not vote for you if you are going to vote for the continuation of these wars overseas. And by no means, I don't expect anybody here to be some kind of a pacifist. If our country is attacked, we will attack. If there's an imminent attack, we will attack. If there's an actual threat, we will attack and we will fight that. However, we cannot continue to go down this path. We have to make that clear to our leaders. That's what gives me hope.
allenanalysis
Posted - March 10, 2026 at 4:00 PM
Saved - March 10, 2026 at 10:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I celebrate Shawn McCreesh for looking the President in the eye and forcing accountability. He asked why the administration claims Iran bombed its own elementary school with a weapon we sell, and challenged Trump’s refusal to own the truth. 165 girls, ages 7-12. This is accountability journalism—going for the jugular, not softball questions or protecting access. Remember that name: Shawn McCreesh.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

🚨💪HELL YEAHHH: A reporter just did what every journalist in that room should be doing. @ShawnMcCreesh looked the President of the United States in the eye and said: “You suggested Iran bombed its own elementary school with a missile only America sells. You are the only person in your government saying this. Why?” Trump’s response: “Whatever the report shows, I’m willing to live with it.” 🔥🔥 165 girls. Ages 7-12. That’s what accountability journalism looks like. Not softball questions. Not access journalism. Not protecting your White House credential. Going for the jugular on behalf of dead children. Remember that name: @ShawnMcCreesh. That’s how it’s done.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions: "You just suggested that Iran somehow got its hands on a tomahawk and bombed its own elementary school on the first day of the war, but you're the only person in your government saying this. Even your defense secretary wouldn't say that when he was asked, standing over your shoulder on Saturday. Why are you the only person saying this?" Speaker 1 responds: "Because I just don't know enough about it. I think it's something that I was told is under investigation, but Tomahawks are used by others, as you know. Numerous other nations have Tomahawks. They buy them from us. But I will certainly whatever the report shows, I'm willing to live with that report."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You just suggested that Iran somehow got its hands on a tomahawk and bombed its own elementary school on the first day of the war, but you're the only person in your government saying this. Even your defense secretary wouldn't say that when he was asked, standing over your shoulder on your plane on Saturday. Why are you the only person saying this? Speaker 1: Because I just don't know enough about it. I think it's something that I was told is under investigation, but Tomahawks are are used by others, as you know. Numerous other nations have Tomahawks. They buy them from us. But I will certainly whatever the report shows, I'm willing to live with that report. Yeah, please.
allenanalysis
Posted - February 14, 2026 at 7:21 PM
Saved - February 14, 2026 at 11:55 PM

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

🚨 BREAKING: Marjorie Taylor Greene just admitted the Epstein files were blocked by Donald Trump himself. “He fought the hardest to STOP these files from being released.” Not Democrats. Not the DOJ. Not “the deep state.” Trump. https://t.co/GMTdqPXyMl

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that the effort to release the Epstein files came directly from President Trump. They acknowledge that many people may have a hard time with this claim, but state that it is the truth. The speaker also says that Trump fought the hardest to stop these files from being released.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That fought that fight to release the Epstein files came directly from president Trump. And I know a lot of people have a hard time with that, but that is the truth. He fought the hardest to stop these files from being released.
allenanalysis
Posted - February 13, 2026 at 2:35 PM
Saved - February 14, 2026 at 11:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I hear Massie say the Speaker, the Attorney General, the FBI Director, the President, and the Vice President could’ve spared our party months of humiliation by doing the right thing four months ago. They knew. They delayed. They protected themselves. Now the cover-up is collapsing in real time.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

🚨 Massie just said what GOP leadership has been terrified to admit: “The Speaker, the Attorney General, the FBI Director, the President, and the Vice President could’ve spared our party months of humiliation if they’d done the right thing four months ago.” They knew. They delayed. They protected themselves. Now the cover-up is collapsing in real time.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 (John) explains that the other side “got tired of me winning, so he joined our side,” and asserts he has no animosity toward him, only regret that it became personal for some people, not for him, because it’s always about the survivors. He describes a reversal: after months of fighting, the speaker, the attorney general, the FBI director, the president, and the vice president could save everyone if they’d done the right thing four months ago. He questions whether Congressman Greene truly supports the release now, suggesting he’s only backing it because the president told him to support it, and attributes this to Mike Johnson. Speaker 1 asks if John believes the president’s current stance, given weeks of opposition and now support. John says he is concerned the president is opening a flurry of investigations and fears they may use those investigations as a predicate for not releasing the files. He believes they will try to use a legal provision allowing withholding materials if they are the subject of an ongoing investigation and would harm that investigation. Speaker 2 notes that the focus is on President Trump: he initially blocked the release and now has the power to release the full files anyway. Speaker 0 summarizes that for four months the president thought secrecy was best, but someone convinced him the releases are better; if serious, they should release them now. Speaker 1 asks why John thinks the president has resisted for so long. John contends the files implicate billionaires and friends of Trump and his donors, plus Epstein’s ties to intelligence agencies, which is why there’s effort to stop the release. He predicts attempts to stop it will occur elsewhere and that this will backfire. Speaker 1 asks if the president will sign the bill; John says he thinks he will sign and would like to be at the signing party, joking about being invited to sign his own bill. John addresses personal attacks: the president attacked his wife, calling Margie Taylor Greene a traitor. John says the attack was a new low for him, but he laughs it off; his wife joked about inviting Trump to their wedding, and she blames him for not inviting him, which she says led to the anger. John remains optimistic the bill will pass tomorrow, with a veto-proof majority, and thinks the speaker will begrudgingly support it. Speaker 1 asks about the public breakup with Marjorie Taylor Greene over the Epstein files. John says Greene represents the base—the populist movement that brought Trump to the White House—and when Trump told supporters they are no longer his supporters if they want the Epstein files released, Trump lost many supporters, but Greene did not, and she remains in favor of seeking justice for the survivors. Speaker 1 asks if Trump has lost touch with the MAGA base. John believes Trump has strayed on fiscal responsibility, starting wars overseas and regime change, and on releasing the death steam files, away from the campaign promises that defined the MAGA base.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: John. Well, he got tired of me winning, so he joined our side. I have no animosity toward him. I I regret that it got personal for some folks, but it never has for me. It's always been about the survivors. Speaker 1: What do you mean? What's the reversal? I mean, after months of fighting here, how was that? Speaker 0: Well, the speaker, the attorney general, the FBI director, the president, and the vice president could save us all this time and an embarrassment, frankly, for our own party if they'd just done the right thing four months ago. Speaker 1: Do you believe him, congressman? I mean, for weeks, he's been pushing against this, and now he said he supports it. Do you buy it? Speaker 0: He's only supporting it because president told him to support it. No. That's what that's what Mike Johnson does. Speaker 1: No. I'm I'm talking do do by president Trump saying that he wants the house to pass its release. Speaker 0: Well, I'm concerned that now he's opening a flurry of investigations, and I believe they may be trying to use those investigations as a predicate for not releasing the files. That's my concern. Speaker 1: Because they don't it's you think they'll try to block it? Speaker 0: Well, they will I'm afraid they're gonna try to use a provision of the law that allows you not to release these materials if they're subject of an ongoing investigation and would harm and the release of which would harm the Speaker 1: ongoing investigation. Speaker 2: This is all about for president Trump? First, he was blocking this, pushing Republicans to block Speaker 3: this for so long. Now he's reversing course, and he has the power to Speaker 2: release the full files anyway. Speaker 0: It was pretty simple. For four months, he thought the best thing for him was to keep the files secret, and somebody convinced him that the best thing for him was to release the files. And if they're serious about it, they should release them right now. It's that simple. Speaker 1: Why do you think he is working so hard not to get them released for so many months? What do you think the real reason is? Speaker 0: It these files implicate billionaires and friends of him and of his and political donors that he's trying to protect. And Epstein also had close ties to our own intelligence agencies and Israel's intelligence agencies. That's why there's so much, effort in trying to stop this. And and I do believe they'll try to stop it somewhere else, and that's gonna backfire on them too. Speaker 1: So the president's saying he'll sign it. You don't you don't buy that? Speaker 0: No. I think he'll sign it. I wanna be there at the signing party. Speaker 1: Think he'll be invited? Speaker 0: I've never seen somebody not get invited to sign their Speaker 1: own bill. But what would you say? There's a personal nature of this. I mean, again, he goes after you, your wife, calls Margie Taylor Greene a traitor. Speaker 0: Be clear. He went after my late wife and my current wife. Speaker 1: What do you think about that? Speaker 0: I I think it's a new low for him, but, again, we laughed it off. It's it's more to his detriment than mine that he, you know, put something like that out. But I think it was beyond the pale. And if that's what it took for him to go that far to realize he needs to support this instead of opposing it, then that's okay. And My but by the way, my wife has laughed about it. She did tell me to invite Trump to the wedding, and I didn't. So she blames me for him getting mad. Are you optimistic this will pass tomorrow? Yeah. I think it's gonna pass. I think it it I think it's gonna pass with a vetoed proof majority. Speaker 1: Do you think the speaker will support it? Speaker 0: I I think begrudgingly, he has to at this point. Speaker 1: Congressman, you obviously hide your differences with president Trump in the past, but congressman Greene is was one of his closest allies, one of his strongest supporters. What do you make of the fact that over the Epstein files have prompted this such a public and searing breakup? Speaker 0: Well, Marjorie represents the base. I mean, she represents what we campaigned on, more so than me even the populist movement that, you know, brought Trump into the White House. And when he told his supporters that they're no longer his supporters, if they still want the Epstein files released. He lost a lot of supporters, but Marjorie didn't. And she, you know, she's in favor of finding justice for these survivors, and so she won the argument. Speaker 1: Do you think that president Trump has lost his touch on the Magabies? He lost his understanding of the MAGA base? Speaker 0: I I think on, aspects of fiscal responsibility, on aspects of starting wars overseas and getting into regime change, and on this case of releasing the death steam files, I think he has strayed away from the things that he campaigned on.
allenanalysis
Posted - December 13, 2025 at 1:15 PM
Saved - December 13, 2025 at 9:51 PM

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

🚨 THIS is the real story behind the Warner Bros. chaos. Larry Ellison isn’t chasing movies. He’s positioning to take control of CNN ahead of the 2026 midterms, with Trump and Jared Kushner circling the regulatory and financial pressure points. This is a shadow war over the election.

allenanalysis
Posted - November 15, 2025 at 3:18 PM
Saved - November 15, 2025 at 6:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I built my own searchable database of all 26,000 Epstein documents from the Oversight release—no paywalls, no gatekeepers, no media spin. It shows Trump is mentioned more than anyone else in Epstein’s files. Every email, reference, joke—all in the archive. Full breakdown here: https://open.substack.com/pub/theallenanalysis/p/i-built-a-searchable-database-of?r=6fupmp&utm_medium=ios

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

🚨 I built my OWN searchable database of all 26,000 Epstein documents, straight from the Oversight release. No paywalls. No gatekeepers. No media spin. And here’s the part they don’t want you to know: Trump is mentioned more than ANYONE else in Epstein’s files. Every email. Every reference. Every joke. It’s all in the archive. Full breakdown here ⬇️ https://open.substack.com/pub/theallenanalysis/p/i-built-a-searchable-database-of?r=6fupmp&utm_medium=ios

I Built a Searchable Database of All 26,000 Epstein Documents. Here’s What It Reveals. Get The Allen Analysis in your inbox theallenanalysis.substack.com
allenanalysis
Posted - July 15, 2025 at 10:07 PM
Saved - July 16, 2025 at 3:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered details about the Epstein prison footage and the mysterious disappearance of 2 minutes and 53 seconds. On the night he died, only one camera was recording, while others were down for 11 days due to a DVR crash that went unaddressed. The footage was recorded by MCC tech staff, seized by the FBI, and later edited by someone using the name “MJCOLE~1.” This editing cut out crucial moments, and the DOJ labeled the altered video as “raw.” The failures span multiple parties, raising serious concerns about evidence handling and transparency. The public deserves the full, unedited footage.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

🚨BREAKING: We now know exactly who had custody of the Epstein prison footage and how 2 minutes and 53 seconds vanished before the world saw it. The cover-up has timestamps. Let’s trace the chain. 🧵

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

The night Epstein died, only one camera in the SHU was even recording. The rest? Down for 11 days. MCC’s DVR crashed on July 29, and no one fixed it. Not IT. Not security. Not leadership. That’s the first failure.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

So who had custody of the footage? 📌 MCC tech staff recorded it. 📌 FBI seized the drives on Aug 11. 📌 DOJ oversaw the investigation. 📌 And in May 2025, someone under the username “MJCOLE~1” opened the files in Adobe Premiere… and trimmed them. By exactly 2 minutes and 53 seconds.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

The cut starts at 11:58:58 PM. It ends at 12:01:51 AM. That means the entire “missing minute,” the one everyone asked about — was literally edited out of the final public video. Then DOJ called it “raw.”

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

So who’s responsible? 🟥 Lamine N’Diaye – Warden who failed to fix the DVR 🟥 BOP Officers Noel & Thomas – Lied about cell checks 🟥 “Company 1” – Security contractor who built the faulty system 🟥 FBI CART team – Took over evidence 🟥 DOJ technician “MJCOLE~1” – Edited the video before release And finally… 🟥 Pam Bondi, overseeing DOJ’s public explanation, said it was just “a glitch.”

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Here’s what that means: The original footage ran past midnight. The system didn’t crash, it rebooted, and still captured some of that missing window. But instead of showing us that? They cut it. They literally trimmed the timeline and tried to call it transparency.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

This wasn’t one glitch. It was a collapse: 🔻 Cameras down 🔻 Footage lost 🔻 Staff falsified logs 🔻 Techs missed repairs 🔻 FBI edited the file 🔻 DOJ published a stitched version and hoped no one would check the metadata

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

This case had one job: Preserve the video. Show the truth. Instead? We got Adobe Premiere. We got “MJCOLE~1.” We got a broken DVR and a midnight cut. And now we have 2 minutes and 53 seconds missing forever.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

This is bigger than Epstein. It’s about chain of custody, digital forensics, and how the state handles evidence when it’s inconvenient. They thought metadata didn’t matter. It does now.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

The people deserve to see every second. Not a stitched-together highlight reel. Release the full unedited drive. Unmask “MJCOLE~1.” Explain why 2:53 vanished. We saw the edit. Now we want the receipts.

allenanalysis
Posted - June 7, 2025 at 5:13 PM
Saved - June 8, 2025 at 2:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Stephen Miller labeled the anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles as an "insurrection against U.S. sovereignty." Over 800 protesters confronted federal agents, breached a government building, and caused significant damage. Miller is now calling for National Guard deployment and federal arrests.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

🚨 #BREAKING: Stephen Miller is now calling the anti-ICE uprising in Los Angeles “an insurrection against U.S. sovereignty.” Let’s be clear: over 800 protesters cornered federal agents in a garage, breached a government building, and caused widespread damage. This isn’t just chaos, it’s a full-blown standoff. Miller is demanding National Guard deployment and federal arrests. The stakes just got raised. 📹 @AnthonyCabassa_

Video Transcript AI Summary
A major protest is underway in Los Angeles following mass immigration raids. Approximately one thousand people are encircling the detention facility located between Alameda and Los Angeles Street. The protest began on the front steps of the Federal Building at 300 Los Angeles. Protesters then marched down Aliso, led by a cattle truck, before turning onto Alameda Street. The goal is to encircle the detention facility, where some people are believed to be held.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Giovanna Lotta. You're taking a live look at one of the protests underway in Los Angeles just a few hours after the mass immigration raids. Chris Christie is live in Air seven with the latest. Chris? Speaker 1: Stride, Jovana. It's a major protest going on about two hours now. Close to a thousand people now wrapping around the detention facility between Alameda And Los Angeles Street. They started on the front steps of the Federal Building at 300 Los Angeles. Now marching down Aliso, and the lead there is that cattle truck leading the pack as they make the turn onto Alameda Street. The strategy here is to basically encircle the detention facility, which is that building right there where we understand there are actually some people inside of the building
allenanalysis
Posted - June 7, 2025 at 1:55 AM
Saved - June 8, 2025 at 2:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Protesters have surrounded a federal detention center in Los Angeles, creating a tense standoff with federal agents amid ongoing ICE raids. The situation escalated as demonstrators clashed with law enforcement, resulting in the use of rubber bullets and tear gas. An LA business owner even locked ICE agents inside their building during a search, drawing the FBI to the scene. The protests are intensifying, and I’m committed to providing real-time updates and unfiltered analysis as events unfold.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

BREAKING: Protesters have surrounded the federal detention center in Los Angeles. California isn’t backing down, this is a full-blown standoff with the feds. https://t.co/d4495b5N7i

Video Transcript AI Summary
A major protest is underway in Los Angeles a few hours after mass immigration raids. Close to a thousand people are encircling the detention facility between Alameda and Los Angeles Street. The protest began on the front steps of the Federal Building at 300 Los Angeles, and the crowd is now marching down Aliso. A cattle truck is leading the pack as they turn onto Alameda Street. The strategy is to encircle the detention facility, where some people are understood to be inside.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Giovanna Lotta. You're taking a live look at one of the protests underway in Los Angeles just a few hours after the mass immigration raids. Chris Christie is live in Air seven with the latest. Chris? Speaker 1: Stride, Jovana. It's a major protest going on about two hours now. Close to a thousand people now wrapping around the detention facility between Alameda And Los Angeles Street. They started on the front steps of the Federal Building at 300 Los Angeles. Now marching down Aliso, and the lead there is that cattle truck leading the pack as they make the turn onto Alameda Street. The strategy here is to basically encircle the detention facility, which is that building right there where we understand there are actually some people inside of the building

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

https://t.co/3hOypVoTyM

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

ICYMI: Downtown LA just turned into a scene out of a movie, an LA business owner locked ICE agents inside their building during a search. Now the FBI’s on site. You really can’t make this up. https://t.co/f137hzG3SH

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

https://t.co/3BGa46SKry

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

ICYMI: Protesters are surrounding federal agents across Los Angeles as ICE conducts mass arrests of undocumented immigrants. Tensions are rising fast, this isn’t just resistance, it’s a standoff. https://t.co/Qqrzi6sktD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes authorities are trying to get the rest of the agents out of the building. The speaker identifies the agents as mostly FBI. They are likely collecting additional evidence from inside and ensuring all agents are out before dispersing. The speaker believes that most of the people targeted inside the building have been taken into custody and removed in vans. The remaining investigators and agents are now leaving the location. The speaker feels the activity will wrap up within the next several minutes, and the crowd will disperse.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think they're still bringing more people out? Is that is that what they're setting up for here? You know, I think they're just trying to get the rest of the agents out. This is mostly FBI at this point that are here, and they're probably collecting additional evidence from inside and just making sure that that all their agents were out of the building before they dispersed. So we are seeing a couple more agents that are making their way out of the building. As far as people that are being taken into custody, I believe for the most part, the people that they were targeting inside the building have been taken into custody and are were taken away in those vans. And now it's just a matter of the remainder of the investigators and agents to leave the location. And that's what we're seeing here. They're starting to kind of wrap things up here. So I feel that this is going to basically wrap up here within the next several minutes. Ultimate ultimately, we'll see the crowd kind of disperse, but it's just a matter of whether they are going to

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

https://t.co/J7Tymag345

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

🚨 BREAKING: Chaos erupts in Los Angeles as protesters clash with law enforcement outside a federal detention center holding over 40 undocumented immigrants. Rubber bullets and tear gas are flying. Riot police are on the scene after demonstrators attempted to breach the facility following an ICE raid. FBI agents have reportedly been attacked as tensions boil over. The crowd is growing, and the situation is escalating fast. Developing… 🎥 First footage via @AnthonyCabassa_

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Stay ahead of the curve, because by the time the media catches up, it’s already old news. Follow for real-time updates. Tap the bell 🔔 so you never miss a beat. And if you want deeper dives, insider leaks, and unapologetic analysis, subscribe to @allenanalysis. No fluff. No spin. Just the unfiltered truth delivered straight to you.

allenanalysis
Posted - September 8, 2023 at 3:02 PM
Saved - June 2, 2025 at 2:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been highlighting the concerning issue of Arizona's groundwater being used to grow alfalfa for Saudi Arabian cattle. With 3,000 gallons of water per minute being extracted, I question whether this resource should prioritize local residents or foreign livestock. The worsening drought has intensified scrutiny on these operations, especially after Arizona revoked permits for Fondomonte, a Saudi-owned company. Despite these actions, I wonder where the legislation is to protect our natural resources from foreign exploitation. I aim to keep you informed on these critical topics.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Listen up: Saudi Arabian cattle are being fed on millions and millions of gallons of Arizona’s underground aquifers. 3,000 gallons of water per minute is used to grow alfalfa in Arizona which is then exported back to Saudi Arabia as cattle feed. The fundamental question is whether Arizona's groundwater should primarily serve its residents or be utilized for Saudi Arabian livestock. I have valid concerns regarding resource allocation and priorities. 💧🐄🌵

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

In the arid landscape of La Paz County, rural Arizona, situated along the state's rugged border with California, the decision by a Saudi-owned dairy corporation to cultivate alfalfa in the American Southwest for livestock in the Gulf kingdom initially raised questions almost a decade ago. The worsening drought has now cast a renewed spotlight on the company's operations and whether Arizona should take more proactive measures to safeguard its dwindling groundwater resources. As reported by AP News.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Saudi Arabia, which has grappled with its water scarcity issues over the past decade, imposed limitations on the cultivation of certain forage crops within its borders. Particularly, alfalfa. The decision by Fondomonte to select Arizona as the location for growing these crops has sparked frustration among some residents in the state. Arizona, which relies significantly on the Colorado River for its water supply, has recently experienced two consecutive years of federal water reductions from the river, intensifying concerns about its water resources. Yet, the state allows this atrocity to continue. Where is the legislation to protect the state's natural resources?

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Amid a comprehensive investigation led by the sthe state attorney general, Arizona recently revoked two permits that had granted Fondomonte Arizona, a subsidiary of Almarai Co., the authorization to bore over 1,000 feet (305 meters) into the water table to extract up to 3,000 gallons (11 kiloliters) of water per minute to irrigate their forage crops. Still, where is the legislation to prevent companies with foreign majority shareholders from extracting American natural resources?

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

These leases for land within Arizona's borders were established under the administration of Republican Governor Doug Ducey. The state of Arizona holds jurisdiction over these lands and the associated agreements. https://t.co/lN3WlVp2XX

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

I make threads like these daily, follow me today and stay updated with topics that affect your daily lives, with some occasional art and historical facts. Be sure to turn on tweet Notifications🔔 next to the follow button.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Keep up:

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

DON’T FORGET: The Trump administration tried its hardest to reign in TikTok, but under its watch, the largest oil refinery in the United States was sold to Saudi Arabia’s OPEC— A gang of the largest oil-producing countries. The Motiva Refinery, recognized as the largest oil refinery in North America, underwent this significant division of assets. During this split, Saudi Aramco assumed complete ownership of the Port Arthur, Texas refinery, while Shell gained ownership of refineries located in Norco and Convent, Louisiana. Which, by the way, was ultimately sold for over $600 Million dollars to who? … Saudi Arabia. 🛎️ The largest U.S. oil refinery, operated by Motiva Enterprises LLC, is jointly owned by Saudi Aramco, a Saudi Arabian state-owned oil company, and Shell Oil Company, a subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell. Saudi Aramco holds the majority stake in Motiva. The refinery, situated in Port Arthur, Texas, has substantial capabilities for refining crude oil and manufacturing diverse petroleum products.

allenanalysis
Posted - April 15, 2025 at 10:45 PM
Saved - April 16, 2025 at 11:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Chaos erupted at Marjorie Taylor Greene's town hall when a protester was tased during the event, highlighting the contradiction of promoting free speech while silencing dissent. I emphasize the importance of staying informed with real-time updates, as media often lags behind. For those seeking in-depth analysis and insider information, I recommend subscribing to @allenanalysis for straightforward, unfiltered insights. The situation at the town hall is escalating, with multiple individuals being removed, adding to the tumultuous atmosphere.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

🚨 BREAKING: Chaos at Marjorie Taylor Greene’s town hall—an unruly protester just got tased in the middle of her Georgia event. Because nothing says “small government and free speech” like electrocuting dissent in a public forum. https://t.co/bFxXWQmTVn

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Stay ahead of the curve, because by the time the media catches up, it’s already old news. Follow for real-time updates. Tap the bell 🔔 so you never miss a beat. And if you want deeper dives, insider leaks, and unapologetic analysis, subscribe to @allenanalysis. No fluff. No spin. Just the unfiltered truth delivered straight to you.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

🚨 DEVELOPING: Three people were just removed from Marjorie Taylor Greene’s town hall—one of them tased after getting into it with police. The chaos is catching up to the circus. https://t.co/ozFWzDYRHd

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes the peaceful nature of the town and town hall setting. They then introduce the first video to be shown.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a this is a peaceful town Now this is a peaceful town hall, ladies and gentlemen. This should not have to happen. This is a town hall. So I'd like to start with our first video.
allenanalysis
Posted - March 9, 2025 at 4:09 PM
Saved - March 10, 2025 at 6:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk is more than just an electric car mogul; he's seen as a threat to democracy by protesters in Chicago. The "Takedown Tesla" march targeted Musk’s proposed Department of Government Efficiency, which critics argue aims to dismantle federal oversight and empower billionaires. Protesters want Tesla to become a symbol of corporate greed, similar to other controversial brands. This movement highlights broader concerns about the influence of Trump's billionaire allies on public services and accountability. Our tax dollars support Musk's empire, and the fight against this power grab is just beginning.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Tesla’s Takedown: Chicago Protesters Declare War on Musk’s Billionaire Power Grab If you still think Elon Musk is just a guy who makes electric cars, you’re not paying attention. Downtown Chicago just erupted, and the message was clear as a blaring Cybertruck horn: Musk isn’t just a businessman—he’s a billionaire executioner, axing federal agencies while playing kingmaker for Trump’s second-term demolition crew. The ‘Takedown Tesla’ protest, led by Indivisible Chicago, wasn’t just a march—it was a declaration of war. Protesters stormed Michigan Avenue straight to Tesla’s Streeterville dealership, waving signs like “Launch Musk to Mars” and “Democracy Dies with DOGE”. Their target? Musk’s dystopian Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—a Trojan horse designed to gut federal jobs, erase oversight, and turn public services into billionaire chew toys.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Why the Uproar? 🔥 Musk’s “Efficiency” is a Hostile Takeover The U.S. government isn’t a startup, but Musk is running it like one—firing thousands, dismantling regulation, and grabbing more unchecked power. DOGE isn’t about cutting waste—it’s about cutting everyone but the billionaires out of the equation.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Tesla: The New MAGA Uniform? Protesters are pushing to make Tesla the next corporate pariah—think Chick-fil-A or MyPillow. The message? If you’re driving a Tesla, people should know exactly what side of history you’re on.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Trump’s Billionaire Boys Club This isn’t just about Musk—it’s about Trump’s entire billionaire class, using “government cuts” as a smokescreen to consolidate wealth and kill accountability. First, they strip public services to the bone—then they sell them back to you at a premium.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Chicago just drew the battle lines. The only question is: who’s next?

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/03/08/hundreds-gather-to-criticize-trump-musks-spending-cuts-at-takedown-tesla-protest/

‘Takedown Tesla’ protest: Hundreds gather in Chicago to criticize spending cuts by Elon Musk and Donald Trump Hundreds of people gathered downtown to protest President Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s government spending cuts, carrying signs that read “Launch Musk to Mars” and “Democracy Dies with DOGE.” chicagotribune.com

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Our tax dollars built his empire and it’s also our tax dollars protecting his empire. https://t.co/CRi2Cp2lwK

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Stay ahead of the curve—because by the time the media catches up, it’s old news. Hit follow for real-time updates, tap the bell icon for instant alerts, and if you want deep dives with razor-sharp analysis, follow @allenanalysis. No fluff. No spin. Just the unfiltered truth.

allenanalysis
Posted - January 24, 2024 at 9:40 PM
Saved - January 24, 2024 at 11:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Department of Defense's Office of the Inspector General has uncovered concerning details about the White House pharmacy. The investigation revealed issues with record keeping, regulatory violations, identity verification, excessive use of brand-name drugs, and the distribution of controlled medications. The report also highlighted concerns about health care costs for ineligible staff and billing irregularities. The OIG recommended establishing oversight and implementing pharmaceutical oversight. DoD officials have agreed to these recommendations. This situation raises questions about accountability and the safeguarding of controlled substances.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

New Report: 🚨🧵A recent investigation by the Department of Defense’s Office of the Inspector General has uncovered concerning details about the White House pharmacy. For years, the White House Medical Unit, overseen by the White House Military Office, has been handling a comprehensive range of pharmaceutical services for senior officials and staff. This includes the storage, inventory, prescription, dispensing, and disposal of medications, even potent ones like opioids and sleep aids. Alarmingly, this unit has been operating without the supervision of a licensed pharmacist or pharmacy support staff and lacks accreditation from any external agency. The Department of Defense’s Office of the Inspector General (DoD OIG) revealed alarming findings about the operations of the White House's informal pharmacy. Initiated by complaints in May 2018 regarding alleged "improper medical practices" by a "senior military medical officer," the investigation involved 70 interviews with Military Office officials who served in the White House from 2009 to 2018, focusing primarily on activities from 2017 to 2019 during the Trump administration.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Key issues highlighted include: 1. Record Keeping: The pharmacy staff maintained handwritten prescription records, often marred by errors, illegible entries, strikeouts, and missing crucial information like medical provider details and mandatory patient data. 2. Regulatory Violations: The pharmacy allowed White House staff to access over-the-counter drugs from open bins, contrary to Navy medical regulations. It also failed to properly dispose of controlled substances, raising the risk of misuse. 3. Identity Verification and Eligibility Issues: Prescriptions were dispensed without verifying patient identities and were provided to individuals not eligible for care. 4. Excessive Use of Brand-Name Drugs: There was a preference for expensive brand-name drugs over more affordable generic equivalents, contravening regulations. For instance, the pharmacy spent about $98,000 on brand-name Provigil, a medication for sleep disorders, which is significantly costlier than its generic counterpart. Similarly, around $46,500 was spent on Ambien, a sedative, which is 174 times more expensive than its generic version. An additional $100,000 was overspent by having Walter Reed National Military Medical Center fill these brand-name prescriptions. One striking anecdote involved a staff member recalling a request from an unnamed doctor to provide Provigil as a "parting gift" for someone leaving the White House. This paints a picture of a highly unregulated and haphazard approach to pharmaceutical management at one of the most significant government institutions.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

The Department of Defense’s Office of the Inspector General (DoD OIG) report unveiled further concerning practices within the White House Medical Unit’s pharmacy operations. A key revelation involves the preparation and distribution of “White House baggies,” containing controlled medications like Ambien and Provigil, ahead of overseas trips. These packets, often containing five tablets in a zip-lock bag, were distributed to White House staff, sometimes without proper protocol, as described by a pharmacy staff member.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Key Findings and Concerns: 1.Distribution of Controlled Medications: The practice of handing out packets of Ambien and Provigil to staff for overseas trips, often through informal means and without adequate controls. 2. Health Care Costs for Ineligible Staff: The White House Medical Office possibly incurred substantial expenses on health care for ineligible staff members. While the Executive Medicine clinic had 60 enrolled patients, care was provided to about 6,000 employees, potentially leading to billing issues with the Department of Defense. 3. Billing Irregularities: Between 2017 and 2019, senior officials were given a patient category code for care at Walter Reed, resulting in improper billing and over $496,000 in waived outpatient fees. 4. Systemic Operational Failures: The OIG concluded that the pharmacy operations had widespread and severe issues, primarily due to ineffective internal controls and non-compliance with pharmacy safety standards. Contextual Information: • The report does not directly mention Rear Admiral Ronny Jackson, the physician to the president from 2013 to 2018, who faced allegations of misconduct and misuse of Ambien. These allegations were part of a separate OIG investigation released in 2021. • A draft of the report was completed in 2020 but was under review in the White House Military Office until July 2023.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Recommendations and Responses: •The OIG recommended establishing oversight of the White House pharmacy, setting policies to determine staff eligibility, and implementing pharmaceutical oversight. •DoD officials have agreed to these recommendations and are in the process of implementing them. This situation exposes significant lapses in the management and distribution of medications within one of the nation’s most critical government institutions, raising questions about accountability and the safeguarding of controlled substances.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Read the official report here: https://media.defense.gov/2021/Mar/03/2002592287/-1/-1/1/DODIG-2021-057.PDF

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

🎯 https://t.co/6F2JXJk8mp

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

🎯

@downunder045 - Naked Mole Rat

@allenanalysis @fiona_webster22 Hint to readers - the report is talking about Ronny "Candyman" Jackson FBI/DEA - you can find this drug pusher in TX https://t.co/I5JpSmZarb

allenanalysis
Posted - January 6, 2024 at 5:11 PM
Saved - January 6, 2024 at 10:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
At a recent town hall, Laura Loomer was escorted out by police at Nikki Haley's request, despite having confirmed tickets. This incident raises questions about Haley's approach to dissent and free speech, and how she would handle global leaders like Putin and Xi. It highlights conflicts within the GOP and raises concerns about unity and leadership in facing national and global challenges. Loomer suggests a disconnect between Haley's rhetoric and actions regarding dictatorial behavior.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Laura Loomer recently reported a tense incident at a .@NikkiHaley town hall in Iowa. If they can't unite, how will they unite the nation? Despite having confirmed tickets and merely standing at the event, Loomer was escorted out by police at Haley's behest. This move by Haley, who aspires to the presidency and often speaks of challenging dictators with resolve, raises questions about her approach to dissent and free speech. Loomer provocatively asks how Haley would handle global leaders like Putin and Xi when she seemingly struggles with internal GOP dissent. This incident not only highlights conflicts within the GOP but also raises broader concerns about unity and leadership in facing national and global challenges, especially on significant anniversaries like that of January 6th. .@LauraLoomer suggests that Haley's actions contradict her public stance against dictatorial behavior, pointing to a disconnect between her rhetoric and actions.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 is confused about why they are being asked to leave a presidential campaign event. Speaker 0 explains that it is because they are on private property. Speaker 1 questions why they are being kicked out if they work for Nikki's campaign and were told to sign up for the event. Speaker 0 refuses to answer questions and asks Speaker 1 to leave. Speaker 1 insists that they received an email and text instructing them to sign up for the event. Speaker 2 also asks Speaker 1 to leave, but Speaker 1 argues that they are asking nicely too. Speaker 0 reiterates that they don't have answers and that Speaker 1 must leave the premises.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Josie, I saw this reference. Speaker 1: I don't know. What's the problem that we're here for an event? Like, I'm just standing here. Let's do the lead. Thank you. Guys so much. Presidential campaign event. Right? Can you just explain to me, like, why you're asking me Speaker 0: to leave? Because they want you to leave. Why? It's private propertyness. Speaker 1: Private propertyness. Private property. Standing here. Like, what's the issue? Speaker 0: You please gather your things and Speaker 1: you please I don't understand. Like, what's the issue if you work for Nikki's campaign? Oh, Nikki. Why I'm sending her to sign up for the event? I told you. Calls that you're just gonna kick me out. So Michael be the 1st female president when she's kicking a woman out of here tonight. Speaker 0: I'm not here to answer questions. Speaker 1: If you Speaker 0: have any comments or turns, you can contact them. Speaker 1: Well, I I'm here to do security, so please leave. You guys you guys sent me an email. I got here text last, and it says to sign up for the event. So what is the issue? Speaker 2: I'm asking nice of Speaker 1: you. Well, I think I'm asking pretty nicely as well. Speaker 0: And I don't have answers for you. I'm sorry. Speaker 2: I just got advised Speaker 0: that you must leave a premises. That's right. So
allenanalysis
Posted - October 23, 2023 at 2:48 PM
Saved - October 23, 2023 at 9:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Republican candidates for House Speakership have a controversial history. Most voted against certifying the 2020 election results after the Capitol Insurrection. Gingrich had an affair, Hastert served time for child molestation, and Ryan aimed to dismantle Social Security. McCarthy defended Trump post-January 6, Scalise faced racism accusations, and Jordan overlooked sexual misconduct. Donalds submitted fabricated evidence, Bergman opposed certifying Biden's win, and Emmer has a troubled past. Hern benefits from conflicts in Ukraine and Israel. Johnson played a significant role in the insurrection. Meuser, Palmer, Scott, and Sessions are election deniers. All candidates deny the election results.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Have you taken a closer look at the Republican's top picks for House Speakership? Every candidate, except for Reps. Emmer and Scott voted against certifying the 2020 election results following the Capitol Insurrection. Noteworthy, Gingrich had an affair while his wife battled cancer. Hastert served time for child molestation. Paul Ryan sought to dismantle Social Security. McCarthy defended Trump post-January 6. Steve Scalise has been accused of racism. Jim Jordan was implicated in overlooking sexual misconduct.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Byron Donalds Byron Donalds has a checkered history, from drug dealing to bank fraud. Recently, he submitted fabricated evidence during a televised hearing on Biden’s impeachment. The American populace surely deserves better.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Jack Bergman Jack Bergman opposed certifying President Joe Biden's win, even following the insurrection attempt.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Tom Emmer Tom Emmer, while not voting against certifying the 2020 election results, is known for his erratic behavior. His Wikipedia page notably features sections on "Drunk driving," "Allegations of antisemitism," "'Fire Pelosi' machine gun video," and "Bullying."

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Kevin Hern Kevin Hern is the Congressman presently reaping the most benefits from the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Israel, according to his stock holdings.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Mike Johnson Mike Johnson (LA) holds a 6-6 rating on the Insurrection Scorecard. Liz Cheney labels him as "extraordinarily destructive," a claim worth heeding. Johnson orchestrated the insurrection bloc, acting not merely as a figurehead but as a proficient yet radical litigator and organizer. His presence is genuinely alarming, emphasizing the high stakes involved.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Dan Meuser - election denier.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Gary Palmer - election denier.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Austin Scott

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Pete Sessions - election denier.

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/9-republican-candidates-running-for-house-speaker/

Who are the 9 Republicans running for House speaker? Here are the candidates House Republicans are back at square one in the search for a new speaker. These are the nine representatives running to replace Rep. Kevin McCarthy, who was ousted at the start of the month. cbsnews.com

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

I make threads like these daily, follow me today and stay updated with topics that affect your daily lives, with some occasional art and historical facts. Be sure to turn on tweet Notifications🔔 next to the follow button. @allenanalysis also follow My media page: @DiaryoftheTimes

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

https://t.co/ug611mzbcr

@allenanalysis - Brian Allen

Don't be misled: Although 2 out of the 9 Republicans didn't vote against certifying the election results on January 6, BOTH signed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to overturn the 2020 election. This implies that ALL 9 Speaker candidates deny the election results. This behavior is aberrant, yet it reveals their true nature.

View Full Interactive Feed