reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @almircolan

Posted - November 29, 2023 at 1:27 AM

Saved - December 2, 2023 at 8:39 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The staged crib visit by Elon Musk raised questions about the ammunition used. The metallic links seen in the photos indicate the use of 7.62×51mm NATO rounds, which are fed from belts, a feature exclusive to the IDF. The incident involved Israeli Merkava tanks breaching gates and firing, potentially targeting civilians. Another possibility is the use of 5.56×45mm ammunition with M27 metal belts, but this is less likely. The Negev machine gun, also used by the IDF, could have been involved. The bullets in the photo appear to be the smaller 5.56×45mm version, not the 7.62×51mm. The IDF's indiscriminate firing from various weapons filled homes with bullets.

@almircolan - Almir Colan

Elon @elonmusk crib visit was staged. Hamas's AK47s use smaller 7.62×39mm bullets, fed from magazines, unlike the 7.62×51mm NATO rounds, which are fed from metal belts. Those metallic links around show clearly who was firing those rounds. Only IDF has those. A quick search on Wikipedia will clearly show this about those metal bullet links: The M13 link, formally Link, Cartridge, Metallic Belt, 7.62mm, M13, is the U.S. military designation for a metallic disintegrating link specifically designed for ammunition belt-fed firearms and 7.62×51mm NATO rounds. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M13_link

M13 link - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@almircolan - Almir Colan

Here is the most plausible way that this incident occurred: The 7.62×51mm machine guns used on Israeli Merkava tanks, similar to those in many NATO-standard weapons, typically utilize M13 disintegrating links. In the chaos of the day (Oct 7), IDF soldiers were instructed (as seen in the attached video) to breach the gate with their tanks and open fire, even though they were uncertain (according to the female IDF soldier in the video) whether they were targeting civilians or not. She then stated: "I fired with my machine gun at the house."

@almircolan - Almir Colan

Another possibility is that smaller ammunition, specifically the 5.56×45mm, was used with the very similar-looking M27 metal belt (as they both appear almost identical), but this is not mounted on Merkava tanks, rather on military vehicles and armored personnel carriers. I consider this less likely because, on October 7, as per the report at https://thegrayzone.com/2023/10/27/israels-military-shelled-burning-tanks-helicopters/ - it was IDF tanks and Apache helicopters were scrambling and targeting anything that moved.

October 7 testimonies reveal Israel’s military ‘shelling’ Israeli citizens with tanks, missiles - The Grayzone Israel's military received orders to shell Israeli homes and even their own bases as they were overwhelmed by Hamas militants on October 7. How many Israeli citizens said to have been "burned alive" were actually killed by friendly fire? Several new testimonies by Israeli witnesses to the October 7 Hamas surprise attack on southern Israel thegrayzone.com

@almircolan - Almir Colan

Another option is that the IDF soldiers were using the Negev machine gun, which also uses 5.56×45mm ammunition and can utilize metal links similar to those seen in the picture. In any case it is clear that these bullets and metal links were from IDF. See more about this gun - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bADUD3VQ2U0

@almircolan - Almir Colan

I think this is the Negev machine gun used by the IDF, though it's not entirely clear video, but that seems most likely. You can see the metal links flying to the right as they feed the bullets. https://t.co/3dSNAKRznF

@almircolan - Almir Colan

Final point about this post: The bullets in the photo appear to be a bit smaller version than I thought, specifically the 5.56×45mm used in the IDF's Negev machine gun, rather than the 7.62×51mm. Instead of the M13 metal link, these smaller bullets use the nearly identical M27 metal link (see photo and compare the two). They are both utilised by the IDF and are very similar. If Hamas were targeting infants, they would likely display those bullets and weapons. Hamas was taking hostages on Oct 7, and the other side attempted to prevent this by targeting anyone on the move (including their own), in a tactic that has been named IDF Hannibal Directive. The point I'm making is that the IDF, who fired indiscriminately from machines, tanks, and helicopters, are the ones who filled those homes with bullets.

@almircolan — Almir Colan

Posted - November 29, 2023 at 9:46 AM

Saved - November 29, 2023 at 3:24 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

In the chaos of the day, Israeli soldiers breached a gate with their tanks and opened fire, using 7.62×51mm machine guns. Uncertain if they were targeting civilians, a female soldier admitted to firing at a house. The incident raises concerns about the use of force and the potential harm inflicted on innocent individuals.

@almircolan - Almir Colan

Here is the most plausible way that this incident occurred: The 7.62×51mm machine guns used on Israeli Merkava tanks, similar to those in many NATO-standard weapons, typically utilize M13 disintegrating links. In the chaos of the day (Oct 7), IDF soldiers were instructed (as seen in the attached video) to breach the gate with their tanks and open fire, even though they were uncertain (according to the female IDF soldier in the video) whether they were targeting civilians or not. She then stated: "I fired with my machine gun at the house."

@almircolan — Almir Colan

Posted - November 1, 2023 at 8:27 AM

Saved - November 1, 2023 at 1:49 PM

@almircolan - Almir Colan

What if Hamas was hiding in Israel? James vs caller https://t.co/0d1pJLvNbF

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speakers discuss the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the issue of civilian casualties. Speaker 1 argues that it is not helpful to equate the intentional killing of Israelis with unintentional deaths of Palestinians. Speaker 0 questions this viewpoint and asks what Israel would do if Hamas were hiding in their country. Speaker 1 believes Israel would pursue different tactics due to the presence of Israelis. The conversation highlights the difference in motivation between the two sides and the concern for civilian lives.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You're saying that the it it doesn't matter how many Palestinian people die, it will never be as bad as the murdered Israelis on October 2nd. Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not saying that at all. Speaker 0: What are you saying? Speaker 1: One one one is too many. I just say it doesn't help. I just say it doesn't help to call The Israeli's murderers and killing and to make an equivalence between what happened the massacre of people doing something on purpose and people not not killing people on purpose. Yes. That's what I'm saying. Speaker 0: See, I I that's where I struggle. Speaker 1: Life is the same. Speaker 0: That's how can you say it's not on purpose? Speaker 1: Sorry. They're not killing them. Their their aim the motivation is not to go and kill children. What is it? Their motivation. There is it's to eradicate Hamas Hamas. The ex potential threat from Israel comes from Hamas. Have you have you read their founding charter? Speaker 0: Yes. Of course I have. I quote it regularly on the program. Speaker 1: So there you are. So their ex threat is real and they're and it's from someone next door. Speaker 0: But they are not. So you the the Palestinians that are being killed are being killed deliberately. Speaker 1: They are not You Speaker 0: can't shoot you can't fire a missile by accident. Well, you can. But that's not no one's claiming that that's what's happening here. Let me can I run something by you, Stuart? Speaker 1: Sure. What Speaker 0: if Hamas was hiding in Israel? What would the Israeli government do then to eradicate them? Speaker 1: They would seek them out. Speaker 0: But no. What would they do? Would they adopt the same policies? Would they be blowing up Israeli hospitals after issuing a warning to get all the patients out of intensive care. Speaker 1: That's another that's another that's another myth, isn't it? They haven't blown up Speaker 0: don't let me distract you from the question I asked. How do you think how do you think the Israel another forces No. No. No. I said that they have prior to smuggling bombarding it. They've issued an order to evacuate from the Alcudz hospital in Gaza City. So now we can agree on what the facts are. Let's not get distracted from the central question. If Hamas was hiding in Israel, what policies would you still approve of the Israeli collateral damage approach to eradicating Speaker 1: anything. I don't disapprove or approve anything. Okay. Speaker 0: Would would you still use the phrase collateral would you still use the phrase collateral damage? Speaker 1: Yes. Of course, I would. Speaker 0: So 3,000 dead Israelis would be a price worth paying for the pursuit of Haman. Speaker 1: I didn't say the Palestinians Speaker 0: What are you saying, Stuart? What are you saying? Speaker 1: I'm just saying it's very important Yeah. To be specific I am Speaker 0: being specific. I am being I am. I'm saying, Speaker 1: would you presume Israel on murdering Speaker 0: No. No. I've done the opposite of that. I've done the opposite of that. I spent 20 minutes at the top of the show outlining the existential motivation of of Israel's actions, talked about Dagestana. And and said people will have a problem with however I do this, and I'm grateful to you for proving that. But I think this is a really important question. Whenever I hear the phrase collateral damage or I hear objections to language or claims that it's not the same, do you think that if Hamas was hiding in Israel, the Israeli army would be pursuing the same tactics in pursuit of them with regard to civilian life. Speaker 1: Mhmm. No. I don't. Speaker 0: Well, there it is. Why why not? Speaker 1: Because Hamas are the enemy in another country. It will be a terrorist situation. It is a terrorist it Speaker 0: is a terrorist situation. But why would they not go after Hamas with the same tactics in Israel that they're going after them in Palestine, in Gaza? Speaker 1: For obvious reasons. Speaker 0: Well, tell me what they are. Speaker 1: Because they wouldn't be if they were in a people do get killed in Situations that do eventually storm buildings and and the and the and the hospital Speaker 0: Why is collateral damage acceptable in one Speaker 1: I didn't I didn't say acceptable. Speaker 0: Why why is it why why is it collateral why is it collateral damage then if it happens in Gaza, but not if it happens in Israel? Speaker 1: The motivation is different between the murderous death cult Speaker 0: Yes, I agree. I completely agree, but that's that's why I'm not asking that question. Speaker 1: When you you say words like they're doing it on purpose and it's out of request, you have absolutely no proof that they are Speaker 0: I didn't say they were doing it on revenge. I said families of the victims of Hamas attacks to warn Israel's government that revenge is not a policy amid mounting concerns about civilian casualties in Gaza. You you don't you don't get to put words in my mouth. But you do get to answer say that. And also you You do get to answer my question. Why would it be different for the Israeli army to cause collateral damage in Israel as opposed to in Gaza. Why would it be different? I would say they're less likely to do that. No. No. But this is this is the question. Why would they be less likely to go after Hamas in the same way if they were hiding in Israel that they are if they're hiding in Gaza. Speaker 1: Because there there will be Israelis there. Speaker 0: Pardon? Speaker 1: And they they would care less about they would care less About okay. More about Iranian lives than Palestinian lives. But they're also Speaker 0: And that's it. That's all I wanted, and I and I'm grateful I'm grateful for your honesty.