TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @alx
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
BREAKING: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene announces resignation from Congress. https://t.co/7nvu852Bsv
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker identifies himself as a longtime representative for the common American, arguing that Washington’s political system of both parties uses Americans to fuel cycles of hatred, with no lasting improvement for everyday people. He claims the debt rises, corporate and global interests dominate, American jobs are replaced, small businesses are swallowed by large corporations, and tax dollars fund foreign wars and aid while the dollar’s spending power declines. He states that in recent years, many American families must rely on two earners, and his children’s generation feels hopeless about the American dream. He says he ran for Congress in 2020 with the belief that Make America Great Again meant America First, and emphasizes a conservative record defending the First and Second Amendments, unborn life, secure borders, and opposition to COVID mandates and funding of foreign wars.
He complains that after almost a year in the majority, the legislature has been sidelined, citing an eight-week shutdown that left the House inactive, and notes that during campaign season “courage leaves” and “safe campaign reelection mode” dominates. He criticizes the House for failing to pass a plan to protect Americans’ healthcare and to address overpriced, unaffordable health insurance, accusing both parties of drama instead of working to fix the disaster. He describes his own bills as reflecting Trump-era priorities, including a new census to redraw districts, making English the official language, making it a felony to medically transition a minor, eliminating capital gains taxes on primary-home sales, and eliminating H-1B visas, but says they “sit … collecting dust” because the speaker does not bring them to floor votes.
The speaker argues that ordinary Americans are no longer swayed by paid political propaganda; they live with rising costs, debt, and uncertainty, have faced job displacement by visa workers, and are burdened by student debt with limited high-paying job results. He recounts personal sacrifice: spending millions of his own money, missing time with family, and standing with Donald Trump against impeachment efforts. He describes facing constant personal attacks, death threats, and lawfare, and portrays a split within the Republican establishment that “secretly hates” Trump yet welcomes other figures after elections. He recalls supporting Trump against Democrat lawfare and defending him during impeachment votes, including choosing to vote no on the Democrat-led impeachment in 2021 while his father underwent brain surgery.
He asserts his core stance against policies like the Green New Deal, broad open-border policies, and the trans agenda on children, while defending his loyalty to the party and to America First. He argues that if he is discarded by the president and the MAGA machine for neocons and elite interests, many common Americans would be similarly cast aside. He contends that real power lies with the people and promises to stay aligned with them if they reclaim control from Washington. He announces his resignation, with his last day on 01/05/2026, and expresses a desire to return to the people he loves while seeking a new path ahead, offering a blessing to the audience and to America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, everyone. I've always represented the common American man and woman as a member of the House of Representatives, which is why I've always been despised in Washington DC and just never fit in. Americans are used by the political industrial complex of both political parties, election cycle after election cycle, in order to elect whichever side can convince Americans to hate the other side more. And the results are always the same. No matter which way the political pendulum swings, Republican or Democrat, nothing ever gets better for the common American man or woman.
The debt goes higher, corporate and global interests remain Washington's sweethearts, American jobs continue to be replaced, whether it's by illegal labor or legal labor by visas or just shipped overseas. Small businesses continue to be swallowed by big corporations. Americans hard earned tax dollars always fund foreign wars, foreign aid, and foreign interest. And the spending power of the dollar continues to decline. The average American family can no longer survive on a single breadwinner's income as both parents have to work in order to simply survive.
And today, many in my children's generation feel hopeless for their future and don't think they will ever realize the American dream. And that breaks my heart. I ran for Congress in 2020 and have fought every single day believing that Make America Great Again meant America First. I have one of the most conservative voting records in Congress defending the First Amendment, Second Amendment, unborn babies because I believe God creates life at conception and I love to fight for the little guy. Strong safe borders, I have fought hard for that.
I fought against COVID tyrannical insanity and mandated mass vaccinations and I've never voted to fund foreign wars with your hard earned tax dollars. However, with almost one year into our majority, the legislature has been mostly sidelined. We endured an eight week shutdown wrongly resulting in the house not working for the entire time. And we are entering campaign season, which means all courage leaves and only safe campaign reelection mode is turned on in the House of Representatives. During the longest shutdown in our nation's history, I raged against my own speaker and my own party for refusing to proactively work diligently to pass the plan to save Americans' healthcare and protect Americans from outrageous, overpriced and unaffordable health insurance policies.
The house should have been in session working every day to fix this disaster, but instead America was force fed disgusting political drama once again from both sides of the aisle on television every single day. My bills, reflect many of President Trump's executive orders like calling for a new census counting Americans only to draw new districts, making English the official language of The US, making it a felony to medically trans a minor, and other bills like eliminating capital gains taxes on the sale of your primary home, and eliminating h-1b visas. Just sit, they all sit collecting dust. That's how it is for most members of Congress bills. The speaker never brings them to the floor for a vote.
Many common Americans are no longer easily convinced by paid political propaganda spokespersons and consultants on TV and paid shills on social media obediently serving with cult like conviction to force others to swallow the political party talking points. Because they know how much credit card debt they have, they know how much their bills have gone up over the past five years, they actually do their own grocery shopping and no food costs too much, their rent has increasingly gone up and up, they have been outbid by corporate asset managers too many times when they put in an offer to buy a house. They have been laid off after being forced to train their visa holding replacement. The college degree they were told to earn only left them in debt with no big 6 figure salary. They see more homeless people than ever on their own community streets.
They can't afford health insurance or practically any insurance, and they just aren't stupid. These are the people I represent and love because that is who all of my family and friends are, common Americans. I've been blessed to represent the 14th District Of Georgia for five years. The district is filled with some of the most wonderful, kind hearted, God fearing, patriotic, hardworking people you will ever meet. Good regular common Americans.
I've worked hard to bring taxpayer dollars back home to help district needs. I impeached Biden's Secretary of Homeland after watching my constituents die as he facilitated dangerous open border invasion into America. And I led the effort to defund hard left politically biased NPR and PBS and the corrupt USAID, and I did that as chair of the Doge Subcommittee. I have fought harder than almost any other elected Republican to elect Donald Trump and Republicans to power. I traveled the country for years.
I spent millions of my own money. I missed precious time with my family that I can never get back. And I showed up in places like outside the New York courthouse in Collect Pond Park against a raging leftist mob as Trump faced Democrat lawfare. Meanwhile, most of establishment Republicans who secretly hate him and who stabbed him in the back and never defended him against anything have all been welcomed in right after the the election. And I will never forget the day I had to leave my mother's side as my father had brain surgery to remove cancerous tumors in order to fly to Washington DC to defend President Trump and vote no against the Democrat's second impeachment in 2021.
My poor father and my poor mother, it was way too much for all of us. Through it all, I never changed or went back on my campaign promises and only disagreed in a few areas like my stance against h one b's replacing American jobs, AI state moratoriums, debt for life fifty year mortgage scams standing strongly against all involvement in foreign wars and demanding the release of the Epstein files. Other than that, my voting record has been solidly with my party and the president. Loyalty should be a two way street and we should be able to vote our conscience and represent our district's interest because our job title is literally representative. America First should mean America First and only Americans First, with no other foreign country ever being attached to America first in our halls of government.
Standing up for American women who were raped at 14 years old, trafficked and used by rich powerful men should not result in me being called a traitor and threatened by the President of The United States whom I fought for. However, while yes, hurtful, my heart remains filled with joy, my life is filled with happiness, and my true convictions remain unchanged because my self worth is not defined by a man, but instead by God who created everything in existence. You see, I have never valued power, titles or attention in spite of all the wrong assumptions about me. I do not cling to those things because they are meaningless and empty traps that hold too many people in Washington. I believe in term limits and do not think Congress should be a lifelong career or an assisted living facility.
My only goal and desire has ever been to hold the Republican Party accountable for the promises it makes to the American people and put America first. And I fought against Democrats damaging policies like the Green New Deal, wide open deadly unsafe border policies, and the trans agenda on children and against women. With that has brought years of nonstop, never ending personal attacks, death threats, lawfare, ridiculous slander and lies about me that most people could never withstand even for a single day. It has been unfair and wrong, not only to me, but especially to my family, but it's been wrong to my district as well. I have too much self respect and dignity.
I love my family way too much. And I do not want my sweet district to have to endure a hurtful and hateful primary against me by the president that we all fought for, only to fight and win my election while Republicans will likely lose the midterms. And in turn, be expected to defend the president against impeachment after he hatefully dumped tens of millions of dollars against me and tried to destroy me. It's all so absurd and completely unserious. I refuse to be a battered wife hoping it all goes away and gets better.
If I am cast aside by the president and the MAGA political machine and replaced by neocons, big pharma, big tech, military industrial war complex, foreign leaders and the elite donor class that can never ever relate to real Americans, then many common Americans have been cast aside and replaced as well. There is no plan to save the world or a four d chess game being played. When common American people realize and understand that the political industrial complex of both parties is ripping this country apart, that not one elected leader like me is able to stop Washington's machine from gradually destroying our country, and instead the reality is that they, common Americans, the people possess the real power over Washington, then I'll be here by their side to rebuild it. Until then, I'm going back to the people that I love to live my life to the fullest as I always have. And I look forward to a new path ahead.
I'll be resigning from office with my last day being 01/05/2026. And I look forward to seeing many of you again sometime in the future. May God bless you all and may God bless America.
reSee.it AI Summary
Rachel Maddow and Mark Cuban expressed concerns that Trump may retaliate against business leaders who do not support him, citing Elon Musk as a rare supporter. Cuban noted that most CEOs avoid publicly backing Trump due to fear of retribution. He contrasted his own support for Kamala Harris, suggesting he risks little, while Musk risks much by advocating for free speech. In response, Musk made a humorous remark comparing Maddow and Cuban to a fictional couple, while another participant referenced a pop culture fusion concept.
@WesternLensman - Western Lensman
🚨Rachel Maddow and Mark Cuban warn that Trump will “target” business leaders that don't support him — that they worry "about his retribution or his vengeance." That sounds an awful lot like what’s happening right now with the targeting of @elonmusk and his companies. CUBAN: “You don’t hear a lot of CEO’s other than Elon Musk coming out and supporting him for that very reason…you don’t hear them condemning him because they’re worried about his retribution or his vengeance." “Literally there’s been nobody that I know other than Elon that has come out in support of him." The reality is, Cuban is risking nothing by supporting Kamala and establishment power. Elon is risking everything by opposing them — and standing up for free speech.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that Trump "picked out individual businesses or sometimes individual business leaders who he wanted to use the government to punish" and "went after Amazon and Jeff Bezos" and "went after saying he wanted to go after Mark Zuckerberg," engaging in actions "targeting businesses because of what were perceived to be his political interests." He warns this would make him "radioactive in the business world" because "business people are too smart to think that they can always be on the right side of those calculations." Speaker 1 notes that "you don't hear a whole lot of CEOs ... coming out in support of him" and that "nobody that I know other than Leon Elon" has supported him. He adds that some business leaders support Trump "with the caveat" for a "very transactional" reason: "For the right amount, you can guide policy. I think you saw that with crypto."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In terms of the targeting that he is talking about for a second term and what we saw in his first term when he picked out individual businesses or sometimes individual business leaders who he wanted to use the government to punish. When he went after Amazon and Jeff Bezos, when he went after saying he wanted to go after Mark Zuckerberg, when he did other things that were targeting businesses because of what were perceived to be his political interests, I would have thought that that would have made him radioactive in the business world because business people are too smart to think that they can always be on the right side of those calculations. Right? That they won't ever be the one who's in the crosshairs once you've got somebody who uses the government that way to reward and punish his enemies and and and his friends.
Speaker 1: Well, you don't hear a whole lot of CEOs other than Elon Musk, particularly of large companies coming out and supporting him for that very reason. You know, you don't hear them condemning him because they're worried about his rep retribution or his his vengeance. But literally, there's been nobody that I know other than Leon Elon that has come out in support of him.
Speaker 0: You recently said in an interview that some business leaders who are supporting Trump with the caveat of what you just described in terms of, you know, high level leaders, not too many of them doing it. You said that some business leaders who are supporting Trump are doing it because they think they can manipulate him. Can you explain what you what you mean by that?
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's very transactional. For the right amount, you know, you can guide policy. I think you saw that with crypto.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
@WesternLensman They remind me of a lesbian couple from Portland
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
@elonmusk @WesternLensman They’re going to do the Fusion Dance to become Olbermann https://t.co/jvf77vWzlP
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Never forget that Joe Biden ordered a drone strike that killed a family of 10 including 7 young children and he lied to the country saying they were “high profile ISIS-K targets” after the Afghanistan withdrawal. His false post bragging about it is still up:
@POTUS46Archive - President Biden Archived
I said we would go after the group responsible for the attack on our troops and innocent civilians in Kabul, and we have. My full statement on the strike that U.S. forces took last night against the terrorist group ISIS-K in Afghanistan: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/08/28/statement-by-president-joe-biden-on-the-evacuation-mission-in-kabul/
Error 404
whitehouse.gov
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
What did “we had Clinton, we had everything” mean? https://t.co/WINlJdWR8O
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they had an interview with Virginia Roberts three years ago, but it was not aired. They were initially told the story was "stupid" because no one knew who Jeffrey Epstein was.
The palace threatened them after finding out about Roberts' allegations regarding Prince Andrew. They feared losing access to interviews with Kate and Will, which further suppressed the story. Alan Dershowitz was also implicated.
The speaker says Roberts had pictures and was in hiding for twelve years. The speaker claims they convinced her to come out and talk, and that they had information implicating Clinton, among others. They express frustration that the story is only now coming out. They also mention other women backing up Roberts' claims and Brad Edwards' assertion three years ago that Epstein was the most prolific pedophile in the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've had this story for three years. I've had this interview with Virginia Roberts. We would not put it on the air.
Speaker 1: First of all,
Speaker 0: was told who's Jeffrey Epstein? No one knows who that is. This is a stupid story. Then the palace found out that we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew and threatened us a million different ways. We were so afraid we wouldn't be able to interview Kate and Will that we that also quashed the story.
And then then Alan Dershowitz was also implicated in because of the planes. Told me everything. She had pictures. She had everything. She was in hiding for twelve years.
We convinced her to come out. We convinced her to talk to us. It was unbelievable what we had. Clinton, we had everything. I I tried for three years to get it on to no avail, and now it's all coming out and it's like these new revelations and I freaking had all of it.
I I'm so pissed right now. Like, every day I get more
Speaker 1: and more pissed because I'm just
Speaker 0: like, oh my god. We it was on what what we had was unreal. Other women backing it up. Hey. Yep.
Brad Edwards, the attorney, three years ago saying, like, aunt, like, we there will come a day when we will realize Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific pedophile this country has ever known. I had it all three years ago.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Hello @IlhanMN https://t.co/QsIC1NteZV
@ICEgov - U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
☎️Report marriage fraud: 866-DHS-2-ICE 💍
@USCIS - USCIS
Marriage fraud is a federal crime. There will not be a happily ever after for this illegal alien who was ordered removed from the U.S. 14 years ago due to marriage fraud. She was taken into custody at our Orlando office by @ICEgov and our @FHPOrlando partners. Under @POTUS and
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Minnesota State Representative: “I am illegal in this country and my parents are illegal too”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they are illegal in the country because their father, processing paperwork after his mother's death, listed the speaker's grandmother as his mother. Consequently, the speaker's parents are also considered illegal in the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because his mother had died. My father, as the one processing the paperwork, put my grandmother down as his mother. And so I am illegal in this country. My parents are illegal here in this country.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Her name is Rep. Kaohly Vang Her https://www.house.mn.gov/members/profile/15532
Rep. Kaohly Vang Her (64A) - Minnesota House of Representatives
house.mn.gov
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
I’m told people are protesting due to Donald Trump’s immigration policy. What does stealing sneakers have to do with that? https://t.co/QsI8obHXOk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Someone jokes about looting, asking for new shoes and a shirt. They clarify they are kidding, but still express interest in taking a shirt. They tell someone named Mikey they are watching them and mention lockers and someone named Jordan. They observe that people are "wilding the fuck out" and note someone going to the cash register.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You guys, they're looting. Can I get a new pair of shoes too? I'm not doing shit. Yo. Grab me a shirt.
No. I'm just kidding. I'm just kidding. Just I'm just kidding. Man, let me just get a shirt up in here, dawg.
I watch you, Mikey. I got you, bro. He's got lockers, Jordan. Well, they're wilding the fuck out here. The guy go to the cash register?
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Mayor of Los Angeles Karen Bass: “We are going to fight for all Angelenos, regardless of when they got here, whether they have papers or not, we are a city of immigrants.” https://t.co/rBzKK2HjXb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they will fight for all Angelenos, regardless of immigration status, because Los Angeles is a city of immigrants. The speaker claims this impacts hundreds of thousands of Angelenos.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are gonna fight for all Angelenos regardless of when they got here, whether they have papers or not. We are a city of immigrants, and this impact hundreds of thousands of Angelenos.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Hillary Clinton complains about Elon Musk and JD Vance encouraging Americans to have children, suggests that’s what “legal and undocumented” immigrants are for. https://t.co/qyNZVDWq4p
Video Transcript AI Summary
There's a blatant effort exemplified by Vance, Musk, and others to send a message to women that they should have more children and return to their "born" purpose. This includes discussions of cash benefits for more children or medals for having six children.
These proposals are being contemplated while programs like Medicaid, paid family leave, quality child care funding, and Head Start are being cut, despite these programs supporting child rearing and providing a safety net for women in the workforce. This is framed as a performance about concerns for family life, echoing the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, which advocates a return to the nuclear family and a Christian nation with many children.
The speaker notes the irony of wanting more children while also wanting to deport immigrants, who often have larger families. The speaker suggests this is an effort to return to the lifestyles and economic arrangements of the past. One reason the economy did better than other advanced economies is because of immigrants, both legal and undocumented, who had larger families.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As I posted the other day, this very blatant effort to basically send a message, most exemplified by Vance and Musk and others, that, you know, what we really need from you women are more children. And what that really means is you should go back to doing what you were born to do, which is to produce more children. And they are talking about, you know, cash benefits for the more children you have. This has been tried, by the way, in other countries and it has not worked. Or metals if you have six children.
While they are contemplating, cutting Medicaid, while they have no interest in paid family leave or funding quality child care, they're cutting head start. I mean, go down the list of all the programs that support child rearing and the care of children and create, you know, some safety net for women who are in the workforce, the formal workforce, as well as, you know, raising children. So this is another performance about concerns they allegedly have for family life. But if you had read the Heritage Foundation's Project twenty twenty five, despite Trump saying he knew nothing about it, if you had read it, it's all in there. It's all in there.
Return to the family, the nuclear family, return to being a Christian nation, return to producing a lot of children, which is sort of odd because the people who produce the most children in our country are immigrants and they want to deport them. So none of this adds up. But, you know, one of the reasons why our economy did so much better than comparable, advanced economies across the world is because we actually had a replenishment, because we had a lot of immigrants legally and undocumented, who, had a, you know, larger than, normal, by American standards, family. So this is just another one of their, you know, make America great again by returning to the lifestyles and the economic arrangements of not just the nineteen fifties. I mean, let's keep going back as far as we can, and, you know, see what happens.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared breaking news about Worcester City Councilwoman Etel Haxhiaj, who was caught on police body cam allegedly assaulting law enforcement officers while obstructing the arrest of an illegal alien. The Worcester Police Patrolman’s Union is calling for an investigation, citing her role in inciting a violent crowd and her previous statements against deportation efforts. In light of the situation, I noted that she has locked her X account, and I found humor in her presence on Bluesky.
@alx - Kekius Maximus II
BREAKING: Police body cam shows Worcester City Councilwoman Etel Haxhiaj assaulting federal and local law enforcement officers and impeding the arrest of an illegal alien despite being warned: “You are obstructing federal arrest.. do you understand that? You can be charged.” https://t.co/cyt421krFN
Video Transcript AI Summary
A woman is described as a constituent who has not done anything wrong. Despite this, she is said to be under arrest, but also that she is not under arrest. The speaker repeatedly insists that she should be released because she is traumatized and has done nothing to warrant being held.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Guys, you gotta step back. She's my constituent. The people who are under arrest are under arrest. Okay? She hasn't done anything.
She's under arrest. But she's not under arrest. She hasn't done anything. Sean, she hasn't done anything. Sean, stop.
She hasn't done anything. Let her go. Please let her go. Let her go. She hasn't done anything.
She's traumatized. She's traumatized. Why are you holding her?
@alx - Kekius Maximus II
More information on City Councilwoman Etel Haxhiaj:
@alx - Kekius Maximus II
BREAKING: The Worcester Police Patrolman’s Union is calling for an investigation and charges against a City Councilwoman Etel Haxhiaj for assaulting officers and inciting a violent mob trying to stop the arrest of an illegal alien criminal suspect who was previously arrested for assaulting a pregnant woman. “Etel Haxhiaj incited aggression towards the police during the incident. This councilor participated in the conduct of the unruly crowd and eventually assaulted both Worcester police and federal law enforcement officers on scene. Her behavior also emboldened others to act in this manner.” Councilwoman Haxhiaj previously promised to meet deportation efforts “with Hell” in response to a statement from Border Czar Tom Homan.
@alx - Kekius Maximus II
City Councilwoman Etel Haxhiaj has locked her 𝕏 account https://t.co/H17UF48g0c
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
BREAKING: Update: Former FBI Director James Comey has deleted his post. https://t.co/Qo4OwM8MTt
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
President Trump on The Democrat Party: “It would be harder to beat them if they were normal on things… They’re almost insane. And they do suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome at a high level and I guess I’m honored by that.” https://t.co/4Aa65NJJqm
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes many people "don't know where they are right now" or "what to do," citing men playing in women's sports as an example. He references a Democrat he knows who was "trying to justify men playing in women's sports" and says he wanted to advise him to avoid the topic.
The speaker claims that issues like "transgender for everybody" are not "eighty twenty" splits in public opinion, but rather "ninety nine one." He admits he doesn't like discussing these topics because it reveals the "insane" positions of his political opponents, which he attributes to "Trump derangement syndrome." He states that their behavior makes it "harder to beat them if they were normal."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, not all of them. I think you have a lot of them that, they don't know where they are right now. I think they don't know what to do, like men playing in women's sports. I saw a guy that I know, good guy, Democrat. He's trying to justify two days ago on television, he's being hammered, and he's trying to justify men playing in women's sports, and it's sad.
I wanted to call him and say, you better get off that subject. That's not an eighty twenty. That's about a ninety seven three. Okay? If they talk about, you know, the famous they always say it's eighty twenty.
What's not a lot of these things are not eighty twenty, like transgender for everybody. Let's have transgender for everybody, your kids, everybody. That's not an eighty twenty. They always say that's eighty twenty. That's that's ninety nine one, I would say.
So, look, in one way, I don't like talking about it because I don't wanna talk them out of it because, you know, it would be harder to beat them if they were normal on things. It shows that they're almost insane, and they do suffer from Trump derangement syndrome at a high level. And I guess I'm honored by that. But I'll say this. Look.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Pfeiffer47 - Alex Pfeiffer
You have the memory of a goldfish. https://t.co/McT0HYoXlC
@MollyJongFast - Molly Jong-Fast
This is a rubicon crossed
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
BREAKING: New York Attorney General Letitia James responds to evidence of mortgage fraud: “Let me just say to all New Yorkers and to all Americans: the allegations are baseless. The allegations are nothing more than a revenge tour” and says “no one is above the law” about Trump. https://t.co/pcAI16l5YI
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that allegations against her are baseless and a "revenge tour" following a $454 million judgment against Donald Trump for exaggerating asset values. She claims Trump is targeting law firms, universities, immigrants, and women, causing government chaos.
She asserts her office is fighting executive orders and defending New Yorkers' and Americans' rights, and declares she "will not be silenced."
When asked about allegations regarding her Brooklyn home, she declines to litigate on camera, promising a response at the appropriate time. She believes the aim is to create a headline about a criminal investigation. She mentions right-wing individuals harassing her and her relatives, viewing it as retaliation for actions against Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good to see you, miss James. Thanks for joining us.
Speaker 1: Thank you for having me, Harold.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. What is going on here? Did anybody contact you before this letter went out accusing you of this, that, and the other and making a criminal referral about real estate transactions?
Speaker 1: No. Not at all. And let me just say to all New Yorkers and to all Americans, the allegations are baseless. The allegations are nothing more than a revenge tour. And as you mentioned, my office was successful in securing a $454,000,000 judgment against Donald Trump and others for exaggerating the value of his assets.
He engaged in a patent and practice of fraud. And the interest is accruing each and every day while the case is on appeal in the first department. It's important that individuals know that this is nothing more than the continuation of the tour. He went after law firms, universities, immigrants, women. Thousands of federal employees right now are unemployed.
Our government is in chaos and in disarray. Medicaid, Social Security, CFPB, and the list goes on and on and on. And as you know, as you mentioned, each and every day, my office is leading the fight against these executive orders, which have no legal import at all, have no legal significance. And we are standing up for the rights and privileges of New Yorkers and Americans. I will not be silenced.
I will not be bullied. I will not bend. I will not break, and I will not bow to anyone. No one is above the law, including the president of These United States.
Speaker 0: Okay. The
Speaker 1: office of the attorney general will continue to stand up.
Speaker 0: Let let me, follow-up of some of what's in this, this letter. It says that it says according to media reports, which for us in the media is kind of a red flag, meaning that it seems to be based on some social media posts that I know were made by partisan political actors. But just let me ask you about some of the specifics in the letter. They're saying that your house in Brooklyn is a legal five family, and the mortgage on it, is for a four family house. Is that true?
Speaker 1: So let me just say that, Errol, you know as any good attorney, I will not litigate this case in a camera. It's important that we will respond to these allegations at the appropriate time and in the an appropriate way. But I will not go back and forth with respect to these baseless allegations. I am more focused again on standing up for the freedoms, the liberties, and for the rule of law in the state of New York.
Speaker 0: I was under the impression by all of this that what they were really looking for is what they got, which is a headline saying, you know, Tish James is under a criminal investigation. Is that pretty much what's going on here?
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's what they got. That's what they got. And it's unfortunate that you have some of these right wing conservative individuals who are camped out in front of my home and in front of the homes of my relatives in Virginia, harassing them each and every day. And it's unfortunate, knocking on the doors of my neighbors and the neighbors of my relatives in the state of Virginia. And it is nothing more than a headline, nothing more than, again, retaliation against all of the actions that I have taken successfully against Donald Trump.
Speaker 0: Okay.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Elon Musk's full Speech at Italian Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini's 'The League Congress' https://t.co/xW1bC0s8Wx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Reducing bureaucracy and government spending faces opposition, despite transparency efforts via doge.gov and X. Restricting freedom of speech is a sign of a negative ideology, akin to historical dictatorships, and large government with censorship is fundamentally fascist. Mass immigration will destroy any country allowing it, as a country is defined by its people, not its geography. There is a rise in attacks in Europe, downplayed by media, and the trend suggests a future "slaughter of Europe."
Continuing the war in Ukraine is cruel and senseless, turning young people into cannon fodder with no plan for success. True empathy means stopping the senseless deaths in the conflict. The speaker hopes for closer US-Europe ties, ideally with zero tariffs and greater freedom of movement for workers.
Starting a company is difficult and painful, especially in overregulated Europe. Regulations protect large companies, hindering the growth of small to medium-sized businesses. Radical deregulation is needed, even if it means leaving the EU.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you. Yes. Well, it's very difficult to to reduce the size of the bureaucracy and and government spending. It comes with immense opposition. Even when the things that are we are cutting make no sense at all, it still gets a lot of opposition.
And but we're very transparent with the the Department of Government Efficiency. So any action that we make, we post on the doge.gov website and we post on our X account. So it's extreme transparency, but nonetheless, you know, we get accused of all sorts of things, but we are extremely transparent and we're only we're only cutting the most obvious terrible expenses that make no sense. But none nonetheless, we get attacked like crazy. Yes.
I think as a general rule, you can tell who which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech. The side that is restricting freedom of speech, you know, that would have been sort of the Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini's of the world. They had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That's how that's one of the signs that they are the bad guys. And so, in fact, a restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist, obviously.
So ironically, the pushing for censorship, there it makes it very clear that the the left is the is the the the side that is against freedom, And freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we we should have as a as a civil society. Because ideas should win on the strength of their
Speaker 1: arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed.
Speaker 0: Yes. The mass immigration is insane and will lead to the destruction of any country that allows unfettered mass immigration. That country will simply cease to exist. At at the end of the day, it is a a numbers game, a numbers situation. If there are 8,000,000,000 people in the world and you you let's say you're a country of, you know, 50,000,000, 60 million, or, you know, for a medium sized country or but even for a country like The United States, which is 350,000,000, given that there are 8,000,000,000 people in the world, it only takes a few percent of the rest of the world to move to the country to where it
Speaker 1: is no longer that country. A country is not its geography. A country is its people.
Speaker 0: This is a fundamental concept that is really obvious. And if if you took the the people of Italy and and you teleported the the the people of Italy to say some part of United States,
Speaker 1: it would still be Italy.
Speaker 0: But if you teleported a bunch of people from some other part of the world to Italy, where they're telling people no longer because they've been teleported to America,
Speaker 1: then then the region the geographic region would no longer be Italy. It would be that other country. A country is its people, not its geography.
Speaker 0: Yes. I mean, you're clearly seeing a massive increase in the number of attacks, in Italy and broadly in Europe, and the media the legacy media downplays these attacks.
Speaker 1: But the the attacks, the terrorism, the killing of innocent people is rising. Every week, there's more. And it and
Speaker 0: it's more and more. And and eventually, I think we're going to see widespread slaughter in Europe. That is the trend.
Speaker 1: If you if you simply extrapolate the trend of how
Speaker 0: of what is the rate at which the terrorist attacks are occurring in Europe and and put those points it's basically deadly attacks versus time on a graph and extrapolate that graph, it leads to the slaughter of Europe.
Speaker 1: Your friends, your family, your children, your parents, that's where it leads.
Speaker 0: The the numbers are clear. Well, I have no respect for the warmongers and the war profiteers and those who want the war to continue forever for their own
Speaker 1: purposes. This is, in my view, an evil thing.
Speaker 0: Because I'll talk to someone on the left, and they'll say, we must not give in to Russia. I'm like, but you have no plan for success. So what you are suggesting then is that we we send these poor kids into the meat grinder every day for nothing with no end in sight
Speaker 1: forever. That is cruel, inhumane, and senseless.
Speaker 0: So president Trump is right in this regard. There must be peace, and it's time for the slaughter of the slaughter of the of the young men and old men to stop. Why this is it's time to stop this this senseless
Speaker 1: death machine. That's that's really what it comes down to.
Speaker 0: There are those who like to have the appearance of empathy. I but but but then they they are but they don't have the reality of empathy.
Speaker 1: The the those who are pro war, they have the appearance of empathy. They're hypocrites and liars. If you want the reality of empathy, we must stop the senseless everyday death that lasts forever. That's what that's what true empathy is. We should care about those men who are dying on the in
Speaker 0: the trenches on in Ukraine and Russia who didn't wanna be there.
Speaker 1: They're con they're conscripted. They're forced to be there. They're forced to be Ukraine conscripted. Russia conscripted. They're forced to kill each other.
Speaker 0: Why? For how long?
Speaker 1: It's time to stop. Well, I I hope that, I hope I hope that The United States and Europe, can establish a very close
Speaker 0: partnership. We obviously are there's an alliance already, but I'm hopeful that there can be a very close relationship with America and Europe. And I'm hopeful, for example, with the tariffs that that at the end of the day, I hope it is agreed that both Europe and The United States should move ideally, in my view, to a zero tariff situation, effectively creating a free trade zone between Europe and North America.
Speaker 1: And that that would be my that's what I hope I hope occurs.
Speaker 0: And also more freedom of people to move between Europe and North America if if they wish. If they wish to work in Europe or wish to work in America,
Speaker 1: they should be allowed to
Speaker 0: do so in my view. So that that has certainly been my advice to the president. Well, I think starting starting a company building a company is like staring glass and is like eating glass and staring into
Speaker 1: the abyss. It's very painful and difficult. You need encouragement for starting a company. I recommend that you
Speaker 0: do not start a company. That said, the regulations in Europe Europe is overregulated. There are too many rules and regulations that make it very difficult to create a company and and and do too much to protect large companies at the expense of small to medium sized companies. So the net result is you have a bunch of very small companies in Europe and then a small number of very large companies, but then not much in the middle. So there needs to be a way to go from being a small company if you're making great products and services to be able to scale to ultimately become a big company.
But you have effectively regulatory capture by the large corporations in Europe. They don't really want to reduce the regulatory burden. And they they they like the fact that the reg regulations effectively protect their duopolies or monopolies in some cases. So, really, I think it's up to the government to say no. We have to foster small companies and allow them to compete and reduce regulations because the regulatory situation in Europe is stifling.
And Brussels is is amplifying that greatly. So you have both the local regulations, the country regulations,
Speaker 1: and then you have the EU regulations. There's so
Speaker 0: many regulations in Europe, it's very it makes it extremely difficult to start a company and be successful. So I think radical deregulation is necessary in Europe. And and if that means leaving the EU, it means leaving the EU.
Speaker 1: Thanks a lot.
Speaker 0: Thank you. I love Italy. I look forward to visiting again.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
2.1 million new non-citizen Social Security Numbers were issued in FY2024 https://t.co/eJcLsa9LUA
Video Transcript AI Summary
Antonio Gracias claims that an investigation into Social Security fraud uncovered a surge in Social Security numbers issued to non-citizens, jumping from 270,000 in 2021 to 2,100,000 in 2024. He alleges that under the current administration, individuals can enter the U.S., claim asylum, and receive a Social Security number automatically without an interview or ID. Gracias states that the system defaults to "max inclusion, max pay" for benefits, citing 1.3 million individuals from this group already on Medicaid. A sample of this population revealed voter registration and instances of voting, which have been referred for prosecution. He asserts this is a deliberate program to change the voting map and create a permanent one-party state.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I'd like to welcome my friend Antonio Gracias to the to the stage. I think so. Does it work? I can give you mine. Does it work?
Can you get us past Van Halen radiation belt? It'll be okay. I mean, Buzz Aldrin's still alive and he's he went past the belts. It worked.
Speaker 1: Is this working? Yeah. Hot. Yeah.
Speaker 0: There we go. So Antonio, can you tell us what what you Antonio is helping out with the Social Security. So just trying to review Social Security where you may have heard that we found 20,000,000 dead people marked as alive in the Social Security database. This is too so crazy. And then, you'll notice there's a strange trend here where how many Social Security numbers were issued.
It it's do do you wanna
Speaker 1: Yeah. So let let me let me tell what happened here. We we started at the top of the system.
Speaker 0: I think you're going to talk about a lot of it.
Speaker 1: We started at the top of the system mapping the whole system of social security to understand where all the fraud was. And there's a lot of great people there that showed us really a lot of waste. That came up with a big list of stuff they're working on. You've heard some that already. This is what jumped out at us.
When we saw these numbers, were like, What is this? In 'twenty one, see 270,000 people goes all the way to 2,100,000 in '24. These are noncitizens that are getting Social Security numbers.
Speaker 0: Yeah. This this is a mind blowing chart.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Just this this literally blew us away. Like, we went there to find fraud, and we found this by accident. And this isn't political, by the way. My parents are immigrants.
Yeah. This country's been great to us. My brother and sister are all born in Spain. I'm pro legal immigration. This is not this is not political.
This is not political. This is about America and the future of America. And there are a lot of good people in the system that pointed us in this direction. I wanna I wanna honor them right now that work in the government today who took risk to show us these numbers and tell us what's going on. Yeah.
So I wanna stop for a minute. I wanna I wanna honor those people today. Very good people. Very good people. I have been from DC to Social Security offices to the border to track this down, and very good people have helped us along the way.
I wanna thank them. Yeah. This number, what this is, is when you come in the country, if you're illegal, there's a couple ways to come in. You come in through a port of entry, and you can tell them you're afraid. You'll get they'll give you an asylum asylum case.
You'll get an interview, then you get in. That's one way to do it. Another way to do it is to just go to the border. Literally, this happened. I talked to border patrol myself.
Elon was there too. I went to Laredo, and I went to Brownsville. Elon went to Eagle Pass. You walk up to a border patrol officer, and you tell them you wanna come in. They have a couple of choices.
They could charge you with a misdemeanor or a felony under thirteen twenty five, or they can make it an administrative offense, like a parking ticket, basically. They were told to do that, make it an administrative offense under the last administration. And you go walk across the border, they do what's called a release in your own recognizance, and they give you an NTA, notice to appear, which to appear to judge. The wait times on judges are like average six years. Look at Grock, you'll see it on immigration judges.
There's only 700 of them. This is 5,500,000 people. Okay? So what happens then? Once you're in the country and you've got asylum through one of these pathways, and we've mapped the whole thing out, you can apply for a work document.
You file a seven sixty five, it's the work form, you get this form called the seven sixty six, That's the authorization. And then Social Security Administration automatically sends you in the mail your Social Security number. No interview. No ID.
Speaker 0: This is worth, like, just reiterating. It it it's not that it's not people sometimes think that under the Biden administration that that he was simply asleep at the switch. He wasn't asleep. They weren't asleep at the switch. It it it was a massive large scale program to import as many illegals as possible, ultimately to change the entire voting map of The United States and disenfranchise the the American people and make it a permanent, deep blue, one party state from which there would be no escape.
Look.
Speaker 1: If I hadn't seen this myself, I'm not sure I believed it. I went through it myself and mapped it. Elon is right. This is true. The defaults in the system from Social Security to all of the benefit programs have been set to max inclusion, max pay for these people and minimum collection.
That's what's happening. We found 1,300,000 of them already on Medicaid, as an example. We've gone through On every benefit program we went through, we found groups from this particular group of people, this 5,500,000 people, in those benefit programs. And then what was really, really disturbing us was why. We're asking ourselves why.
And so we actually just took a sample and looked at voter registration records. And we found people here registered to vote in this population, yes.
Speaker 0: And who did vote?
Speaker 1: And we found some by sampling that actually did vote. And we have referred them to prosecution at the Home Ed Secure Investigation Service.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Already. Already. That is already happening.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
POV: You’re Zelenskyy and you just got kicked out of The White House. https://t.co/JAOJE0kdhl
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
President Donald Trump to Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy: “You either make a deal, or we are out…” https://t.co/FjB4DrCvCy
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm not sure what happened, but he didn't break it off with me; he wants to make a deal. The problem is I've empowered you, and without the United States, you don't have the leverage. Your people are brave, but you either make a deal, or we're out. If we're out, you'll have to fight it out, and it won't be pretty because you don't have the cards.
Once we sign a deal, you're in a better position, but you're not acting thankful, which isn't nice. I think we've seen enough; this will be great television. We'll see what we can do and stay out of the way.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Maybe. Maybe he didn't. I don't know what happened, but he didn't break it with me. He wants to make a deal. I don't know if he can make a deal.
The problem is I've empowered you to be a tough guy, and I don't think you'd be a tough guy without The United States, and your people are very brave. But you're either gonna make a deal or we're out. And if we're out, you'll fight it out. I don't think it's gonna be pretty, but you'll fight it out. But you don't have the cards.
But once we sign that deal, you're in a much better position. But you're not acting at all thankful, and that's not a nice thing. I'll be honest. That's not a nice thing. Alright.
I think we've seen enough. What do you think? This is this is gonna be great television. I will say that. Alright.
We'll see what we can do about putting it together. We'll stay out of
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
The U.S. Treasury is part of the Executive Branch. The head of the Executive Branch is President Donald Trump. President Trump was elected by the people. Why is an activist judge able to prevent the head of the Executive Branch from accessing financial info he is in charge of? https://t.co/LgJjUZ7hrv
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
BREAKING: Canada to implement $1.3 billion border plan, send 10,000 personnel to border, appoint a Fentanyl Czar, launch a Canada-U.S. join strike force, and will pause proposed tariffs. https://t.co/8qepqa3MSy
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Elon Musk on USAID threatening Senator Joni Ernst: “It’s outrageous that a taxpayer-funded organization would threaten a U.S. Senator who is simply trying to figure out if American taxpayer money is being spent correctly and not fraudulently.” https://t.co/zWoSgOeWmL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Efforts to understand how American taxpayer dollars are spent on humanitarian aid in Ukraine began years ago. The goal was to ensure transparency in the use of these funds. However, attempts to exercise oversight led to threats from USAID, which is concerning for a taxpayer-funded organization. It is outrageous that a U.S. senator faced intimidation for simply seeking accountability regarding the proper use of taxpayer money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know, Elon, you have been on USAID. You have really and so
Speaker 1: That's the oneness for sure.
Speaker 0: This was another one of my efforts. And this began years ago, when we were trying to figure out what they were doing with our American taxpayer dollars that were going to support, humanitarian efforts in, in Ukraine. So I wanted to know exactly how those dollars were being spent. And not just a reasonable request. Yes.
Oh my gosh. And and I shared this with you earlier, Elon, just privately. But we got all kinds of threats from USAID because I was trying to exercise my oversight capacity in congress. So they
Speaker 1: That's that's just shocking. I mean, it's it's Oh. How I mean, honestly, it's it's outrageous that a taxpayer funded organization would threaten a US senator, who is simply trying to figure out if American taxpayer money is being spent correctly and and and not fraudulently.
Speaker 0: Yes.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
So Andrew McCabe, who was fired from the FBI for lying to investigators under oath about leaking information to the media is now telling us Kash Patel is incapable of being the FBI Director? What a joke. https://t.co/DNOxTaV2sB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Moving forward with Kash Patel's nomination as FBI director will likely provoke significant backlash. Many believe he seeks to disrupt the institution, but he is profoundly unqualified for the role. His experience in federal government is limited to three years as a line attorney at DOJ headquarters, with no leadership or management experience. The idea of him leading an organization of 37,000 people, with operations across 400 locations and sensitive global roles, is unrealistic. It’s hard to imagine him commanding respect in a room full of police chiefs and sheriffs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But in this case, moving forward with a nomination of Kash Patel as FBI director, really, it will provoke, I think, a massive amount of backlash. Now, you know, you can make the argument that that's what he wants. He wants to disrupt. He wants to, you know, provoke the ire of people like me and others who who feel strongly about the institution and what it takes to run it, faithfully and ethically and legally, none of which I think, Kash Patel can do. But we'll we'll have to see.
You know, I think at the end of the day, Kash Patel is profoundly incapable of running the FBI. He is absolutely unqualified for that position. He's never run anything in his life that I'm aware of. He's never managed or led an organization of any type. His entire experience in the federal government is limited to about 3 years as a line attorney in DOJ headquarters.
You know, the idea of him taking on the mantle of leader essentially of the American law enforcement community running an organization of 37,000 people, 400 locations in the United States, people people serving all over the globe in incredibly sensitive capacities working with the intelligence community, and really standing as the representative of law enforcement in this country. The idea that Kash Patel would walk into a room of police chiefs, and sheriffs and command any level of respect and and recognition is is absurd.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
This is the Director of the New York Department of Environmental Conservation, which is responsible for murdering Peanut the Squirrel, and her name is Karen. https://t.co/RaZgfH6Pd6
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
There have been two assassination attempts on this man in the past three months and he walks into a stadium full of 100,000 people like a boss. Next week he’s returning to the site where he was shot. Total badass. https://t.co/hamLLTNNH7
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Michael Cohen says he has no choice but to flee the country if Donald Trump wins the election and that he’s already working on getting a foreign passport with a new name. https://t.co/TacYwc2rsJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states they are working on acquiring a foreign passport with a different name and plan to leave the country if a certain person wins. They express uncertainty about their family's involvement in this move, stating they don't want them to move to where they are planning to go.
Speaker 0 mentions that the person in question has publicly stated intentions to "go after" individuals like the president of MSNBC, General Milley, and Liz Cheney. They also express concern over the Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity, believing it grants the president a "get out of jail free card." Speaker 0 confirms they would leave the country, feeling they have no choice, but would still be available remotely.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do
Speaker 1: you think happens to you if he wins?
Speaker 0: Well, I'm out of here. I mean, I'm already working on, foreign passport with a completely different name. I don't know how it's going to work as far as dealing with my wife and my children. I certainly don't want them moving to where I'm looking to go, but I I I and I don't think you yourself, the president of MSNBC, general Milley, you know, Liz Cheney. How many people has he turned around and said that this is that these are people that I intend to go after if I have the ability to.
And the worst is the supreme court's recent decision that gave him immunity, presidential immunity. Now he thinks it's not only is it I can do whatever I want, but I can't even be prosecuted to get out of jail free card solely for the president.
Speaker 1: So you're out of here. You'd leave the country.
Speaker 0: I have no choice.
Speaker 1: Unbelievable state of being. Michael I'll
Speaker 0: still be available to you, but by remote.
Speaker 1: Remote. Right. By encrypted remote. Thank you for spending time with us today.
Speaker 0: It's always good
Speaker 1: to see you. Somewhere. You've been right about everything.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
“I plan to fly there and stand with Ukraine it is worthy of WW3” https://t.co/5viEsiwj2Z
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
TRUMP: “I will bring back Free Speech in America.. I will sign an executive order banning any federal employee from colluding to limit speech, and we will fire every federal bureaucrat who is engaged in domestic censorship under the Harris regime” https://t.co/BJYAvdKcDT
Video Transcript AI Summary
I will bring back free speech in America because it's been taken away. The fake news is a threat to this country; most of them are terrible human beings. They will write that I spoke before a small crowd of people, even though that's not true. They write the opposite of the facts, and people lose faith in the press. I will sign an executive order banning any federal employee from colluding to limit speech, and we will fire every federal bureaucrat who is engaged in domestic censorship under the Harris regime.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 2nd, I will bring back free speech in America because it's been taken away. They've taken away your free speech and the fake news is a threat is a threat to to this country. They are just horrible. These are horrible people. Not everyone I mean, I know most of them up there.
Some are good. Hello, Brian. No. Some are good and most of them are just absolutely terrible human beings. They know what's going on.
You know what they'll write today? Look at this crowd. It goes from corner to corner to I flew over and I said, that's a lot of people down there. You know what they'll say today or tomorrow when they write? Donald Trump spoke today at Wisconsin before a small crowd of people, small a small gathering, a small gathering of people.
They are just so bad. I don't know. It's, you know, it's really hard to turn it back around unless they used to be like the police force. They'd write the truth, but they're no longer the police force. They're the police force for opposite.
They're a police force for bad. They're bad they're bad people, and they're very dishonest. And a lot of people don't understand, when you're a politician like these people, like me, like others, and you happen to be a republican or somewhat conservative, they write just the opposite of what the facts are. And if you're driving a cab, if you're an accountant, if you're a lawyer, if you're something, you know, other than that, you don't know the details. When we know the facts and then the story gets written, the exact opposite of what it is, you start to lose faith in the press, I will tell you.
But I will sign an executive order banning any federal employee from colluding to limit speech, and we will fire every federal bureaucrat who is engaged in domestic censorship under the Harris regime. We will do that.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
TRUMP: “At the suggestion of Elon Musk — I will create a Government efficiency Commission tasked with conducting a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and making recommendations for drastic reforms. Elon.. has agreed to head that task force” https://t.co/a48F9RUC1f
Video Transcript AI Summary
At Elon Musk's suggestion, who has given his complete and total endorsement, a government efficiency commission will be created. The commission will conduct a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and make recommendations for drastic reforms. Elon Musk has agreed to be on the task force.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 4th, at the suggestion of Elon Musk, who has given me his complete and total endorsement. That's nice. He's a smart guy. He knows what he's doing. He knows what he's doing.
It's very, very much appreciated. I will create a government efficiency commission tasked with conducting a complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and making recommendations for drastic reforms. We need to do it. Can't go on the way we are now. And Elon, because he's not very busy, has agreed to hit that task force.
Be interesting. If he has the time, he'll be a good one to do it.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Election Interference by Meta’s “Independent Fact Checkers” The entire “Fact Checking” program at Facebook and Instagram needs to be dissolved https://t.co/RuC1msJYd8
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Your daily reminder that as bad as the border crisis is under Joe Biden, it would be worse under Kamala Harris. Kamala does not even believe that illegal immigrants are committing a crime. https://t.co/P3N8Em0YV7
Video Transcript AI Summary
Being undocumented is not a crime. We need to change the narrative and stop labeling undocumented immigrants as criminals. Let's treat them with respect and not as lawbreakers when they cross the border.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is wrong to somehow suggest that an undocumented immigrant is a criminal. Being an undocumented immigrant is not a crime. I know what a crime looks like. An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal. An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal.
An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal. Undocumented immigrant is not a criminal. An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal. An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal. An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal.
An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal. An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal, and we have to correct Corus in this conversation. We're not gonna treat people who are undocumented across the border as criminals. That's correct.
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it odd that this letter isn't listed under "Statements and Releases" from The White House. I understand the difference between campaign and official communications, but this letter lacks a campaign logo, and other campaign remarks are included on the site. Why not this one?
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Anyone else find it strange that this letter doesn’t appear under “Statements and Releases” from The White House? https://t.co/KSDqDo8Qj2
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Yes I get the distinction between campaign and official, but this letter doesn’t have a campaign logo either and campaign remarks are also included on the site, so why wouldn’t an official statement be as well? https://t.co/ZBPLY43Nrn
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
One of the best quality videos I’ve seen of the assassination attempt on Donald Trump from Start to finish. https://t.co/7JEG8gvr1V
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Do you think E. Jean Carroll is credible? https://t.co/gHwQ9JR7cY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump is accused of inappropriate behavior towards women. The speaker finds it disrespectful to women who are victims of rape. They recall a past encounter with Trump involving lingerie. The speaker expresses anger and panic, mentioning death threats. They ponder the possibility of DNA evidence on the lingerie. The conversation shifts to Trump's statement about the accuser not being his type. The speaker challenges the perception of rape as sexy. The discussion pauses briefly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Charge against Donald Trump for this. Why not?
Speaker 1: I would find it disrespectful to the women who are down on the border, who are being raped around the clock down there. But for the women down there and for the women, actually, around the world And it was all fairly playful. Oh, it was charming. It was excite remember what Donald Trump was like in 95, 90 6. On the counter were these fancy lingerie boxes that they used to have back in the nineties.
Yeah. You wore lingerie in the nineties, I'll bet you. But He didn't suggest it. He shouted it. He shouted it.
Lingerie. Lingerie. He may have shouted underwear. I Yeah. Okay.
Speaker 0: Were you scared? Were you No.
Speaker 1: I'm too angry? I was too panicked to be scared.
Speaker 0: Too panicked to be scared. Okay.
Speaker 1: Totally. And I put my life on the line. Do you think that you're go well, hold on a second. What do you mean you put your life on the line? Well, people have told me I have to be careful.
You've gotten death threats. I am not looking at death threats. I have the idea that I'm gonna make him put it on over his pants. That was my idea. Mhmm.
You see how funny that would be to make him put that on? I guess my question is is could there be any DNA on there? Idea. I do not know if the president ejaculated. Have no idea.
Lawrence, I wish I had said I wish. I said, I'll tell you my age if you show me your tax returns.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. Yeah. It would've been would've been up
Speaker 1: in that. Well, so I'm holding my handbag like the the only reason I know I'm holding my handbag is because I discovered it in my hand when I got to the street.
Speaker 0: The statement that he said, which he's just made, which is she's not my type number. Well, that was the number one thing.
Speaker 1: Love that I'm not his type. I'm an archer. I have bows and arrows. You know? Yeah.
Fine. I think there's just too never mind. Never mind.
Speaker 0: I think most people think of rape as a I mean, it is a violent assault. It is not a I
Speaker 1: think most people think of rape as being sexy.
Speaker 0: Let's take a short break.
Speaker 1: Think of the fantasies.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. We're just gonna take a quick break. Or if you can stick around,
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Q: “Would you declassify the 9/11 files?” TRUMP: “Yeah” Q: “Would you declassify the JFK files?” TRUMP: “Yeah..” Q: “Would you declassify the Epstein files?” TRUMP: “Yeah, I would.” https://t.co/kZAPcQiCQm
Video Transcript AI Summary
I would declassify the 9/11, JFK, and Epstein files, as Attorney General.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would you declassify the 911, files? Yeah. Would you declassify JFK files? Yeah. Would you I did a lot of it.
Would you declassify the Epstein files? Yeah. Yeah. I would. Attorney general.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
BREAKING: The 911 Call from the night of the attack on Paul Pelosi has been released https://t.co/Abfc9lfmwp
Video Transcript AI Summary
A man named Paul Pelosi calls the San Francisco Police because a stranger named David entered his house and wants to wait for Pelosi's wife. Pelosi doesn't know David's identity but claims he is a friend. The police offer to stay on the line, but Pelosi declines as David wants him off the phone. Pelosi thanks the police and ends the call.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Please send me for 2022
Speaker 1: Oh, I guess I I guess I I told them this.
Speaker 0: 33 What
Speaker 1: is it?
Speaker 2: 18 seconds. It's in San Francisco police. Do you need help?
Speaker 1: Oh, well, there's a gentleman, here just waiting for my wife to come back and have to call a seat?
Speaker 0: 2223 and
Speaker 1: he's just waiting for her to come back because she's not gonna be here for a day, so I just have to wait.
Speaker 2: Okay. Do you need please fire a medical for anything?
Speaker 1: I I I don't think so. I don't think so.
Speaker 0: 0223 and 30 8 seconds.
Speaker 1: There's the, is the Capitol Police around?
Speaker 0: 220. No.
Speaker 2: This is San Francisco.
Speaker 1: Take my wife. They're usually here they're usually here at the house. Protect my wife.
Speaker 2: No. This is San Francisco Police.
Speaker 0: Friday, October
Speaker 1: I I no. I understand. 2022 Okay. Well He thinks everything is good. I've got a problem, but he thinks everything is good.
Speaker 2: Okay. I'll start with your date of your might
Speaker 1: 8 No. No. No. This this gentleman just, came into the house, and he wants to wait here for my wife to come home. 0, 2 And so,
Speaker 0: 4 and 48
Speaker 1: Anyway, he's on the phone. Do you
Speaker 2: know who the person is?
Speaker 1: No. I don't know who he is. He he, he has his he told me. He said he told me not to, he told me not to do anything.
Speaker 2: What is your address, sir?
Speaker 1: 826
Speaker 0: 225 and 0 What
Speaker 2: is your name? Seconds.
Speaker 1: My name is Paul Pelosi.
Speaker 0: Friday. Anyway,
Speaker 1: this this gentleman says that 28, 25.
Speaker 2: Okay. What's the gentleman's name?
Speaker 1: My name is David. The name is
Speaker 2: David. Okay. And who is David?
Speaker 1: I don't know. I'm a friend of theirs. Yeah. I, he says he's a friend but as I said, I've known
Speaker 2: But you don't know who he is? 85 No.
Speaker 1: No, ma'am.
Speaker 0: 68 seconds.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 1: Please tell me I'm being very lenient. So I I gotta stop talking to you. Okay?
Speaker 2: Okay. You sure? I can stay on the phone with you just to make sure everything's okay.
Speaker 1: No. He won't he wants me to get that all off the phone.
Speaker 0: 0226 Okay. And 8
Speaker 1: Thank you. Seconds.
Speaker 2: Okay. Bye.
reSee.it AI Summary
Senior military leadership allegedly ignored Donald Trump's authority as commander-in-chief on January 6, 2021, according to the chief legal advisor for D.C. National Guard. It is claimed that they conspired to defy orders to deploy the National Guard to the Capitol.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
“Donald Trump's authority as commander-in-chief was ignored by senior military leadership on January 6, 2021, claims the chief legal advisor for D.C. National Guard on that day… Claims they plotted to balk orders to deploy the National Guard to the Capitol”
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
NG whistleblower: Trump was 'divested' as Commander-in-Chief on Jan. 6
Colonel Earl Matthews came forward as a whistleblower to the House subcommittee reviewing the January 6 Select Committee's investigation. He has sat down with DailyMail.com.
dailymail.co.uk
reSee.it AI Summary
Richard Nixon wrote a letter to Donald Trump in 1987, praising his performance on 'The Donahue Show' as relayed by Mrs. Nixon. Nixon expressed confidence in Trump's potential success if he were to run for office in the future.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
In 1987, Richard Nixon wrote this letter to Donald Trump after his wife watched this interview: “Dear Donald, I did not see the program but Mrs. Nixon told me that you were great on ‘The Donahue Show,’.. As you can imagine, she is an expert on politics and she predicts that whenever you decide to run for office you will be a winner!”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump discusses various topics including his real estate ventures, his family, his views on politics, and his opinions on various issues. He talks about his success in the real estate industry, his dislike for rent control, his criticism of Mayor Koch, and his belief that the US is being taken advantage of by other countries. He also mentions his charitable donations and his decision not to run for political office. Overall, he expresses his strong opinions and his desire to be successful in business. (134 words)
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For $800,000,000.
Speaker 1: I read it in the paper. And you're not even are you 40? I'm 41. 41. 41.
I wanna show you what he just bought. He bought Marjorie Merriweather Post's 150 rooms. 56 bedrooms this guy's got. In pump show them, Brian. This is Mar a Lago.
That's an aerial view. Now listen to this. I think we got there are 2 pictures here, are there not? You've got to see this place. Look at this.
He has a staff of 50, 30 security guards and this guy can't buy your lunch after Black Monday. How did you do? And you must have lost your shirt. Come on.
Speaker 0: No. I was lucky I was out of the market pretty much, Phil. Like you, like you and like a lot of others. I think most of the people in your group, I don't suspect too many of you, were in the stock market during a little crash. Couple were?
Couple were. I wasn't. I like real estate better.
Speaker 1: This, he when he graduated from high school, he had 200, from college. He had $200,000. Went to the Wharton School of Finance, University of Pittsburgh.
Speaker 0: No. I'll tell you. University of Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. University of Pennsylvania. I'll tell you this. You know, I I kinda after reading your book, I kinda like your father better than you. He's a nice guy.
Speaker 0: You have good taste. He's a good guy.
Speaker 1: Show him number 1. Let's just try and briefly give you a bio here. This is Fred Trump, age 80 something. Yeah. He's 81.
81. He built middle income housing in Queens and Brooklyn. And little Donald go along and rummage around the construction sites. And obviously, his father taught him a thing or two along the way. Look, let's see number 3.
Here here's, here's 12 year old Donald inspecting, yeah, checking out the geology. I don't know what you're doing there, but, now listen to this. Your parents, enlightened as they were sent you to, next slide, the New York Military Academy. Only you went not in this uniform. Is that somewhere in the computer?
There you look at the proud parents end. Obviously, the strap is so you'll keep your mouth shut. Something, and your graduation photo. Next slide. Just give them a quick trip here.
Look at this. So you came out disciplined. You probably said yes, sir, no, sir, and all those
Speaker 0: It was a good education. It was a good training. It was a good training. I enjoyed it.
Speaker 1: Uh-huh. You didn't get married until you were 30 something?
Speaker 0: 31 years old.
Speaker 1: Mhmm. You lived in a, small apartment in Manhattan?
Speaker 0: A little small apartment. I had a lot of good time in that apartment. That was a lot of fun. I've had more fun in that apartment than I have in Trump Tower, as good as Trump Tower.
Speaker 1: Your dad would build medium priced housing and the rules as I understand the game as you explain it to us in this book. Trump, the art of the deal and, not a few folks are rolling the dice on this one too. The front page of the Wall Street Journal today tells us that they're printing a 150,000 copies. Tweaked your cheek a bit. You said there were 200.
Exaggerating, mister Hype.
Speaker 0: No. I'll tell you truthfully. I thought it was 200 and I think it will be 200, but I'm not sure what it is. I don't know what it is exactly. It's a 150 to 200,000.
Speaker 1: Uh-huh. I guess. I don't know. Are you gonna sign books in the stores? You can do all that stuff?
Speaker 0: Every once in a while, I might have to do it. I mean, whatever it takes. All the money is going to charity. I'm giving all of the proceeds to charity. So it's nothing for me, but it's something very important.
I'd like the charities to get a lot of money, and I'd like to also make it nice and because I like having successes. I like success much better than failure somehow.
Speaker 1: Show them, missus Trump, number 7 that is in our computer. Ivanna is her name. She was a top fashion model and a, yes, she was. Look at here. And also a skier, I believe a near Olympian.
She was
Speaker 0: That's correct.
Speaker 1: Alternate or so. Here you are in your honeymoon. Next slide. Where where did you go on the honeymoon? You could probably went to Atlantic City.
We went Hawaii actually. Oh, Hawaii. You, you really have caught the attention. You're a star mister Trump and you're a businessman and you do not run away from publicity. We can only speculate on how long you may have posed for these, rather
Speaker 0: flatter Not long.
Speaker 1: Not long.
Speaker 0: The good part about being a I don't have enough time to do a lot of posing and fortunately, we have some pretty good photographers so they get good pictures. But it's, not not a lot of time, Phil. I just don't have the time, unfortunately.
Speaker 1: You, your father had to come in at the right price and he also was entitled to 7 a half percent profit. Is that what I understood?
Speaker 0: Basically, that's right. Yes.
Speaker 1: And so he had to really count the nails just
Speaker 0: A much different business. There's no question about it. I mean, I count the nails also, but I count them in a different sense. My father built low and moderate income housing in Brooklyn and Queens, and it was a tough business. And today, that kind of a business really doesn't even exist.
Unfortunately, you don't have the government programs that allowed you to do this years ago. My business is much different than that, and and it's turned out to be wonderful, but it's much different. It's a much different kind of a business. Mhmm.
Speaker 1: You say that, in order to ensure that he was profitable, this made it extreme this made it very necessary for your father to be he was at the site at 6, wasn't he, in the morning?
Speaker 0: He was there early in the morning, and he'd leave late at night, and every nail was going to be counted, and he knew every contractor. As I do, really, you have to know what you're doing. You take a look at the city of New York, they can't build an ice skating rink. An ice skating rink was under construction, I guess, for a period of 7 years, the Womens Skating Rink in Central Park, and they couldn't build it. They spent 12 or $14,000,000 was supposed to cost 2.
And we did it for, in about 4 months, as you know, for a very small amount of money. Yeah. It's
Speaker 1: a big success story. No doubt about it. The, you came in and came in under and you did it in months when the city was fooling around. It was a it was a very statement on government bureaucracy, etcetera, etcetera. And boy, you looked like a republican businessman standing there when they cut cut the ribbon, but who's to complain?
They're they're skating as we speak in Central Park. Now you try to get in, you're you're single and you you're out of the Wharton School and, you've moved to Manhattan.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: Leaving your roots, we might say. Ahem. We can only speculate on how your father felt about that. And you wanna join the club, le lay club.
Speaker 0: Well, you know that, club, Phil. You're you're there all the time. I mean, you know, he's he's putting on
Speaker 1: I would tell you.
Speaker 0: He's putting on the little, lack of pronunciation here now. You would never let club?
Speaker 1: Call me anything. Don't call me hypocrite. I've never been to lake club. But, but I I'd be proud to be there some days.
Speaker 0: It's just not a
Speaker 1: I don't mean fine. You meet, now they won't who is this guy, Trump? He's 27 years old. The guy says, you know, we don't, it's, you know, so he he calls the president he gets them to have a drink with them they go to 21 and these guys are drinking. Now I just wasn't used to that.
You say listen fellas I gotta go home. They said no let's add one more. Now I wasn't used to that you say, I have a father who's always been a rock. Very straight and very solid. I believe that.
My father would come home every night at 7, have his dinner, read the newspaper, watch the news and that was that. Swedish. Swede? Swedish, German, a lot of
Speaker 0: a lot of different things. Mostly mostly good. Right?
Speaker 1: Well, and his, his
Speaker 0: A good strong, yes. Good solid man.
Speaker 1: And his father probably plowed his rows straight or whatever they Very small. His parents. Right. And I'm as much of a rock as my father. This was a totally different world.
I remember wondering if every successful person in Manhattan was a big drinker. I figured if that was the case, I was going to have a big advantage. The guys almost passed out and you helped them home
Speaker 0: and you
Speaker 1: got in the club.
Speaker 0: I got in. Later on, I got in. Yes. Yeah.
Speaker 1: You're a rock. You don't drink at all.
Speaker 0: Well, when I say rock, I mean, I think I think of myself as being a solid guy. You have different definitions of people nowadays. You have the word flake. You have people that are strong, people that aren't strong, and everyone is fine. I'm just saying that I would say that I'm rather solid, and I'm I'm proud of that.
Mhmm. So I was a little when I came into Manhattan at first, I saw people that were not of the same ilk in the sense that in in certain instances, they just weren't what I grew up with in terms of a very strong father figure, a very wonderful mother figure, And I was seeing different kinds of people. And it was interesting to me, but I thought I might have an advantage.
Speaker 1: Uh-huh. You drink then a white wine to be while you're staying? I really
Speaker 0: don't drink at all.
Speaker 1: You don't drink at all?
Speaker 0: I don't, you know, I don't drink for a lot of reasons. I don't like what it does to people. I figure it can't be good, and I just don't really enjoy the taste, perhaps most importantly, but I don't like it. I've seen so many people over the years that I had great respect for. And then we'd go out and I'd see them totally lose control.
And all of a sudden, I say, why would a person subject themselves to that? I mean, I've had people who I have tremendous respect for and then you go out to dinner and you have to literally carry them from the from the table to their house.
Speaker 1: Not a good thing. No. I don't like it. Mike Wallace called this to your attention during your the 60 minute piece on you. You're always dressed up.
I mean, at the poolside in your Greenwich home and the Sunday afternoon, you come up with a silk tie and that's just who you are.
Speaker 0: It's just I don't know. I tend to be formal. I like being formal somehow, and I'm not always dressed up. On a Sunday, I'm not dressed up. And on a Saturday, depending on what I'm doing.
But generally, I tend to be doing business. And usually for business, I feel that you should be sort of attired a certain way. And I've I've always been somewhat formal in that regard.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: I'd rather be a little bit too formal than not formal enough.
Speaker 1: Uh-huh. Your, I bet you you pick up your socks and your underwear too, don't you? Or do you? I don't know.
Speaker 0: I never gave it much thought, but I guess I do now that I think.
Speaker 1: You deposit them in the appropriate
Speaker 0: Put them put them wherever they go.
Speaker 1: Now did did did the New York Military Academy do that for you, or were you always like that?
Speaker 0: I think, and maybe this is a part of the book and what's happening, I think that people tend to be what they are. If a person's neat, if a person's orderly, they tend to be that way throughout a life. And if they're not, they tend not to be. I've always been pretty neat and pretty orderly and pretty, pretty, well adjusted from that standpoint. So I've I've just I I I've had a good training, but I really believe that in many cases, and perhaps that's not a good example, but in many cases, people really have it or they don't have it.
And that's what I'm trying to get through to an extent in the book.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Your mother is of Scottish, Scottish by birth. And, you you tell us here and I must say there's there is some personal information in here. Not a lot, but it's an interesting look. I'd like
Speaker 0: to, you know, leave it out as much as possible. Well, that's getting more and more difficult
Speaker 1: when you if you're gonna be worth a $1,000,000,000 you gotta start answering some questions here. Your mother watched the coronation, didn't she, of, Queen Elizabeth?
Speaker 0: I guess. Yes.
Speaker 1: 53, I think. Somewhere in there. I don't. And your father said, for God's sake, what are you doing? She just sat in front of that set all day.
Didn't she? Watching that season?
Speaker 0: She's really a wonderful woman. And she's got the little showbiz, and perhaps that's I mean, I was obviously very young, but just in thinking back, I believe that whatever I have in terms of the dramatic, whether it's a Trump Tower, or doing a Trump park, or or the hotels, or whatever it might be, I think I've gotten a lot of that from my mother, actually. And my father is a very strong, solid, meat and potatoes guy that Excuse me.
Speaker 1: Where are you in this shot there? Is that you with the hair? I'm on the left.
Speaker 0: Oh, all the way
Speaker 1: on the left?
Speaker 0: Yes. I'm on the left.
Speaker 1: Uh-huh. Go ahead. You were saying?
Speaker 0: So my father's a little bit different type. He, he gets things done and quickly and all, but he's less, perhaps less promotionally oriented. So it's a good combination, I think. Getting getting if you get the the best traits of both, that's a really good combination. I hope.
Speaker 1: You, your father was was there a lawsuit? You didn't have enough black he didn't have enough blacks in his project. There were blacks in his housing development, but, the federal government. And that upset you.
Speaker 0: I didn't like it because it was in fact and I decided to fight it. And this was a lawsuit against numerous landlords in New York many, many years ago and I didn't like it because it wasn't true. In fact, in one building they went, and there was a preponderance of blacks as opposed to whites. And I remember being asked a question, the question was asked about people. How many blacks do you have?
And we said some huge number like 70% or 65%, and they almost fell off the chair. Here they are suing us and we're saying a certain number. We've never discriminated there. We don't believe in it. And, I just thought on a principle ground, I should I should fight.
And other landlords didn't. Okay. And we settled and it worked out very well.
Speaker 1: One of the people you meet at La Club, I gotta get to this place, was, Roy Cohn. May he rest in peace. You liked him. He was feisty.
Speaker 0: Well, I liked Roy from the standpoint that he was a very loyal guy. When you see things happening nowadays, you see very little, loyalty. When you see an Ed Koch, leaving everybody that gets in trouble in New York immediately, he doesn't know his commissioners. He doesn't know Bess Morrison. He doesn't know anybody.
He doesn't wanna know about it. You know, he just drops them like they never existed. The one thing I'll say about Roy is he was an extremely loyal guy and and he was a very unusual guy in that respect. So he was loyal and loyalty is a great trait. In my opinion, it's a great trait.
It's a trait that maybe can cause problems, but it's also a great trait.
Speaker 1: Well, this is interesting because as you know, you're the, fat cat developer and, you know, the book on you is that you throw little old ladies who can't afford to rent out of the apartment.
Speaker 0: I don't think that's the book on me if you want to know. Well, I think I don't think it is at all. I think probably it's just the opposite. We have very wealthy people in this particular building. We have a building on a 100 Central Park South, the best probably the best piece of real estate in New York in the world.
And we have very wealthy people, extremely wealthy people living in this building. Second homes It's
Speaker 1: not quite accurate to say that every occupant is an extremely wealthy group.
Speaker 0: The ones that were complaining were the wealthy ones. The ones that were complaining, Phil, were the wealthy ones. These are people with, a lot of money. 1 of them owns a brownstone, a number of brownstones on East 66th Street, and yet she's living in this building for a rent controlled rent. The rent controlled people, the people that need rent control, they're not the ones that are protected.
It's people that are usually wealthy with a lot of influence that have the connections to get a rent control apartment. People that might need it, they don't have rent control apartments.
Speaker 1: Well, I that's a little facile. I mean, it's that's a little bit like saying, you know, those people are out of work because they're lazy.
Speaker 0: No. It's it's not I think it may
Speaker 1: be well, first of all, let's let's the, the building on Central Park South has been settled. You own it, and you've you've made your deal with all the residents.
Speaker 0: We're very happy with that.
Speaker 1: Store one for you.
Speaker 0: Very happy with that.
Speaker 1: Back to this, this lawsuit. So you hire, Roy Cohn, and he goes to work, and you win it. Cohn doesn't like lawyers either because they always wanna settle, and you don't like that about lawyers. The idea of settling drove me crazy. The fact was that we did rent to blacks in our buildings.
What we didn't do was rent to welfare cases, white or black. I watched what happened when the government came after Samuel Lafrack, another builder, and he caved in and started taking welfare cases. They virtually ruined his buildings. Welfare cases ruined his buildings. Isn't that aren't you pretty close here to to looking like an insensitive guy, from atop your Trump tower looking down on the woman rank over the vast holdings of your own empire, shouldn't we have just a little more understanding from a man of your influence and wealth on the issue of making New York livable for all of us, safety on the subway, these if that if the answer is absolutely, then we can't continue to give you guys these big tax
Speaker 0: breaks
Speaker 1: and that would go for General Electric and NBC too. You tell us in your own book that you would make money, in on the Trump Tower. In New York or when everybody else When how's the tax breaks?
Speaker 0: So when everybody else in the city gets it but Donald Trump, when Koch and the administration tries to stop Donald Trump, and I don't say give me the tax breaks, I say don't give everyone else the tax breaks. If every other building being built in New York City is entitled to a residential tax abatement, and Trump Tower goes, and I'm not entitled, I'm the only building in the city of New York that's not entitled, I don't think that's appropriate.
Speaker 1: Look at the look at the location of your building.
Speaker 0: What difference does it make? There are other wonderful locations. Phil, there are other wonderful locations also that are also getting tax abatements. I won the case. They didn't give it to me.
It took me two and a half years in court. I won it 7 to nothing in 3 different courts, and I'm very happy about it. I didn't win it because I so much needed it as much as because on a moral principle, I was entitled to it. If nobody's gonna get it, I'm satisfied. If everybody's gonna get it, I shouldn't be the only one that's not getting it, Phil.
And I know you well enough to know that you wouldn't take it either. If you were in my position, you wouldn't take that. So that's what
Speaker 1: But you tell us also in your book, you left Queens and you left Brooklyn for Manhattan to, to get away from rent control.
Speaker 0: You're you're you're honest to tell us in this. No. I'm honest. Hey. I'm not running for anything, Phil.
I'm not running for office. I don't have to lie in a book. I wanna tell the facts. Okay? But I mean, do you want me to do you want me to say little fibs and little this and little that and how much we all love rent control?
What a great thing it's been for New York. It's been a disaster for New York. It's badly hurt New York. It's crippled New York. It's made it impossible for a lot of people to live in New York.
And and you see what's happening. You look at the Bronx, you look at certain parts of Queens and Brooklyn, you see what rent control's done. And I think you know it as well as anybody else. Rent control, and I'm one of the few developers in the world that would ever say it, some forms of rent control are sometimes necessary to protect the elderly, to protect people that truly don't have the money. But when you have multimillionaires, and not all instances of this Phil, there's not all instances, but you go to Manhattan, the prime sections of Manhattan, where you have rent control and rent stabilization all over.
Those are wealthy people in many instances. And I don't mean every instance, Phil, but I mean in many and I would say in a majority. You have multimillionaires, in some cases, living in apartments for 200, $300, and $500 a month that should be paying many times. This is gonna sound a little unusual, but New York rents can be $10,020,000 a month. What does that mean?
What does that mean, Phil? That means that the city can't tax because if a wealthy person's paying $300 a month, you can't really tax that beyond a certain point, 20% of that or whatever it might be. So the city is always short of funds. It's a joke what's happened. And the people that need rent control, and there are some indeed, those aren't the people that have it.
It's the people with the connections. Somebody knows Trump. Somebody knows somebody else. They call up. They say, do me a favor.
That's what it's all about.
Speaker 1: If if we the the Saudis wants to get in here. Mister Trump, sir, if your position is, let's let's let's grant a given. No doubt about it. Under rent control circumstances, there's there are going to be certain people who don't need it, who get it. Not unlike social security.
There are going to be some people who get it, who don't need it. But to suggest that that rent control is somehow being pervasively abused throughout the island of Manhattan by people who don't need it. I do have plenty of doubt.
Speaker 0: Well, you ought to check the numbers, Phil. I mean, I can tell you something. Now one one little thing. All I'm asking for is a simple thing. Give a means test.
If a person makes a $150,000 a year working in a big advertising agency, if a person makes 200, 300, a $175,000, let there be a means test so that that person will give the apartment to somebody that can afford it if you have to do that, Phil. Let why can't there be a means test? Why should multimillionaires live for $3 or $400 a month when poor people are paying more than that and have to pay more? And how
Speaker 1: many people would have to work in the office to determine whether or not people are of means or not of means? And would you build the building? It'd be a very large one occupied by thousands of bureaucrats trying to figure out who does and who doesn't. You you wouldn't it isn't that simple. Just to and and What
Speaker 0: about the kind of money you're talking about? If you emptied and made available to people that could have that that need really this protection, the apartments occupied by very wealthy people In New York, you're talking about tremendous amounts of money. And I mean, if you're talking about a number of accountants in order to administrate a program, you're not talking about a lot relative to what we're talking.
Speaker 1: We got lot just a couple more things I wanna get in. Let's see if we can briefly touch on some of these things. You should not have called mayor Koch a moron. That was not good public relation.
Speaker 0: Hey. What can I do? Well, doesn't it isn't this aren't you a little don't you want to take this back off? Bad public relations. No.
I don't take it back. When it comes to running the city, he's about as bad as anybody I've seen. Ed Koch has been a disaster for New York. People that live in New York understand it. Taxes have gone through the roof.
Everything's gone through. You have, whether it's a Wollman Rink or a subway system, whether it's a school that comes in, it takes 8 or 9 years.
Speaker 1: But here, you you are with your folks at city hall getting your picture taken.
Speaker 0: Wasn't it?
Speaker 1: Wasn't it all days?
Speaker 0: Well, I guess you like me in those days.
Speaker 1: No. I just think that, and and this is and I don't think you have to be, a passion language from someone of your power and influence is not good style?
Speaker 0: Phil, from my standpoint, it doesn't really matter. Again, I'm not running for office. If the point is made better by saying that, let the point be made. He's done a lousy job as the mayor. Anybody from New York probably understands it and knows it.
It's it's gone down now and it's going down as the most corrupt hey, Phil. This is the most corrupt administration in the history of
Speaker 1: They have their problem.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: I have here a collection of some of your, quotes from Newsweek. I'm happy to give them credit. On his enemies. If I if people screw me, I screw it I screw back in spades.
Speaker 0: I mean, is there something wrong with that? Tell me. Yeah. Is there something wrong with that? Well, a confrontational kind of I'll get you you son of a bitch.
Let me give you a little example. Yeah. Okay. Okay. What what let let me give you an example.
This country, as I walked into this room today, the stock market was down 75 points. Okay?
Speaker 1: We should say that we're taping on November 30th. We're gonna scare the life out of people who watch this. We are taping on the last day of November in 1987. Sir.
Speaker 0: There's a lot of problems. You had Black Monday. You have the catastrophe of a 500 in April. Let me let me just give you one little example. We have countries out there that are so called allies, and I use the word so called because they're a disaster for this country.
Japan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait. They're making 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars while this country is going out and borrowing money from Japan in order to defend Japan. They don't spend for defense. We defend Japan. We get oil into Kuwait.
Then they go out and they buy 10% of of British Petroleum. Right. I'll tell you what. I think they ought
Speaker 1: to I think they ought to increase their defense spending a hundred fold and their economy will collapse just like ours has. The Japan made wasn't Japan a
Speaker 0: partner in your, TV City project? Japan wanted to be a partner in
Speaker 1: your 25%. Right?
Speaker 0: They wanna buy it. They wanna buy everything. Hey, for 20 years they've taken money out, and now they're coming back because of a low dollar caused to a large extent by them and they want to put it back in.
Speaker 1: You had a $100,000,000 deal with I must be, Troy. I They said we don't wanna deal.
Speaker 0: Where do you read this? You read the newspapers. You believe the newspaper?
Speaker 1: That must be true. I read
Speaker 0: it in the
Speaker 1: New York Post.
Speaker 0: Well, okay. I I thought that maybe is maybe is the case.
Speaker 1: Isn't that true that you lost a Japanese,
Speaker 0: hot machine? Hey. Nobody does a lot more business than me. Phil, let me just explain something. I build luxury apartments.
We sold an apartment to a Japanese gentleman, a number of apartments for $21,000,000. Okay? I've sold other apartments for lots of money for the Japanese.
Speaker 1: Some are
Speaker 0: my best friends. Okay. I just say and I respect the Japanese, but they have taken tremendous advantage of the United States, folks. If in case anybody And and what do
Speaker 1: you want them to do? You want them What
Speaker 0: do I want them to do? I want us to be represented in such a way that we can compete with Japan. They've taken the money out for 20 years, and now they're buying it back in. So what they did is they took it out, and now they're coming in trying to buy all of Manhattan, trying to buy anything. And Phil, I don't like being taken advantage of.
Okay.
Speaker 1: Okay? On Michael Dukakis and the other democratic presidential candidates, Americans are tired of the 7 dwarfs. On Leona Helmsley, I feel sorry for Harry. On Trump, there is no one my age who has accomplished more. Everyone can't be the best.
And we'll be Did
Speaker 0: I say that?
Speaker 1: It's what it says here.
Speaker 0: I get it. Don't believe it.
Speaker 1: And we'll be back
Speaker 0: in just a moment. Believe it.
Speaker 1: Here to, accommodate something like 17 people or 14 or he
Speaker 0: has a
Speaker 1: couple of bedrooms, does it?
Speaker 0: This is getting to be an embarrassing, bro.
Speaker 1: And you've got a and you've also got a yacht. I forget the number the price on that.
Speaker 0: We wanted to get something back from Are
Speaker 1: you happy? I mean, what do you want?
Speaker 0: I mean, I wanted to get something back from Saudi Arabia, so I got one of their yachts, you know. So, you know, it's about time. We should take we should do more of it. Everybody's getting from us.
Speaker 1: Now NBC is not is not apparently, going to, in any agreement with you on the terms of its occupancy of Television City.
Speaker 0: That's
Speaker 1: right. A 150 story building, which you wanna construct on the Hudson River. It would, if you completed this project, be the tallest building in the world. And this be a
Speaker 0: great thing for New York? I mean, you left Chicago in all fairness, Phil. So, I mean, shouldn't New York have maybe the world's tallest building? Wouldn't that be a nice thing for New York, film?
Speaker 1: Well, it it depends.
Speaker 0: For those of us that are proud of New York or used to be at least?
Speaker 1: Well, how much tax abatement is it going to take to build Television City? How will it contribute to the long term well-being of the city? What money's not given? How will the tax money not forthcoming to the city till influence people who are not of wealth? All these are pretty important questions.
Speaker 0: Why do you say I'm asking for tax abatement on the world's tallest building? I'm not asking for tax abatement. You assume I'm asking for tax abatement.
Speaker 1: You're not asking for any tax abatement?
Speaker 0: No. I'm not asking for tax abatement on the world's tallest building. And and, you know, not every job has to have tax abatement, Phil. That's one that, hey, if they wanna give it to me, I'd love to take it. But to be perfectly honest, I'm not asking for tax abatement in the world's tallest building.
Speaker 1: Well, in what language do you
Speaker 0: So you're on the assumption that everything I do, I'm looking for an edge, and that's not necessarily correct. It's usually correct, but it's not necessary.
Speaker 1: Well, what is the status of that deal? You and NBC have broken off time.
Speaker 0: NBC, the process is gonna be too long. I'm going for zoning on the west side. It's a fabulous parcel of land on the west side of Manhattan, fronting the water from 72nd to 59th Street, and I'm going for zoning. New York City is a very cumbersome process. This number 30,
Speaker 1: I think,
Speaker 0: is possible.
Speaker 1: There it is.
Speaker 0: There it is.
Speaker 1: This, 100 acres, think about this. In man on Manhattan Island, this is that's the Hudson River. Now what do you want, what shall we do with this property and who shall decide? And how and who will, who will live there? Who will work there?
Where will they park?
Speaker 0: How are they going to get into And how what? How are they going to get into the Broadway and and 72nd Street subways, Well, they're not.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be a great big empty building, and nobody's gonna be able to get to this state. What just very briefly, what tell us what is, what is the status of this?
Speaker 0: It's going through a long process that New York City in New York City, when you build something, you have to go through a very agonizing long process. And it's a process that's putting New York, frankly, at a great disadvantage with other cities because if you wanna put something up, it could take years years before you do it. We're toward the middle, maybe even rounding the corner on the end of that process. And I guess over the next, period of a year, hopefully, it'll be ready. And if not, I'll just sit back and wait till perhaps a more progressive administration comes in.
I'm not sure. I may have to do that, which would be unfortunate for New York. Everybody agrees this site has to be developed. It's probably the most important site. You probably know it because you're in that area, but it's the most important site in New York.
And it's got to be developed and it will be developed. It's a question of when. It's a very important site for New York and for the future of New York.
Speaker 1: Yes, ma'am.
Speaker 2: What, charities do you benefit?
Speaker 0: Well, I give a lot of money to charity and more and more so. And I think that I'm going to be doing more in the future. I gave, a lot of money to the Vietnam veterans. You remember the big parade in New York? I gave a $1,000,000 toward that on a matching grant a year, a year and a half ago, whenever it was.
And I think if you asked any Vietnam vet what they think of Donald Trump, I think they'd think I hate to be talking about it, to be perfectly honest, because I don't like to be bragging that I gave a $1,000,000 last year to the Vietnam vet and vets, and it's not really my style and perhaps Phil and other people wouldn't like it even for my image because it's not the image that they wanna project. But I gave a lot of, I gave a lot of money to the, to United Cerebral Palsy, many 1,000,000 of dollars. In fact, I gave them a building, a lot of other money. I I believe strongly that you have to put it back. And I I give, I think, far more money or or in in most cases, more money than just about anybody else comparably.
Uh-huh. Okay? Thank you.
Speaker 1: You're gonna have a you're going to You're going to have a very large party to celebrate, the publication of your book. I am told that this party, incidentally, I do not have having reviewed all of the many invitations that I, of course, receive every day. I
Speaker 0: just happen to have one.
Speaker 1: I I have not yet this obviously, you you know
Speaker 0: the postal service. You'll have one by 4 o'clock today. Thank goodness.
Speaker 1: It's probably the government again. The postal service, I'm sure, lost it. Here's my question. You can't start this party in your atrium lobby of Trump Tower because that is a public arena, at least legally defined as such, until 10 o'clock.
Speaker 0: 10 o'clock is when it starts. So Well, that's
Speaker 1: late for a football party. No. It's not. No. Now wait a minute.
Speaker 0: When did you go? Remember the old days of Studio 54? When did you go there before 10 o'clock? If you ever went there. Maybe you never went there.
You never went to a club, so never you
Speaker 1: Here's the point. Do you think it's possible that mayor Koch himself decided to enforce the law and ensure that you couldn't get your party started?
Speaker 0: I tend to doubt it because he probably doesn't even know what's going on. So I tend to doubt
Speaker 1: it. And we'll be back in just a moment. When it comes to office products and office furniture, total office product when it comes to office products and office furniture, Total Office Products has it all. Convenience, service, selection, and a hot sizzle It disallows Hyatt from constructing a hotel in New York City or either of its and including either airport forever?
Speaker 0: Yes. Well, for about 40 years or so. I don't know if you call that ever, but for a long period of time.
Speaker 1: Hyatt cannot build another hotel in New York City.
Speaker 0: That is essentially correct. Yes.
Speaker 1: And that's because you put that into a deal that you struck with the Pritzker's in Chicago.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Do you gamble?
Speaker 0: Hopefully not too much. I mean, to be perfectly honest. Well, but that's not what we all expect too.
Speaker 1: Customers will do do when they come to play.
Speaker 0: No. No. They gamble and they win sometimes and they lose sometimes. But you
Speaker 1: don't gamble.
Speaker 0: I do not gamble, no.
Speaker 1: I assume you're disallowed from gambling in your own casino.
Speaker 0: I am. I'm not allowed to gamble, and they're the only places I'd wanna gamble at anyway because they're the best places, though.
Speaker 1: Don, I was just wondering about what's the situation with the New Jersey generals? Where are they at?
Speaker 0: The, the court is, we won the case, and we only got a dollar.
Speaker 1: That was the USFL?
Speaker 0: That was USFL. It was an interesting
Speaker 1: suit against the NFL
Speaker 0: Against the NFL.
Speaker 1: Saying you're a monopoly, and the court said you're right. Saying
Speaker 0: they're a monopoly.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. The NFL's a monopoly and the court said they are a monopoly and only rewarded you $1.
Speaker 0: Right. The courts gave us $1. And, so we won the case, but we only got a dollar. That's on appeal right now, and I think we're gonna be hearing the decision very shortly. And it's very possible.
In fact, it's been up there for a long time, an appeal, and it's very possible we're gonna end up winning that. I think it's very possible because I think it was injustice. We won the case, but we didn't get the damages that we sought. And those people that followed the generals, the generals were a great success in New York and New Jersey. As you know, we had 45,000 people average attendance.
It was a tremendous success. And we'll see what happens.
Speaker 1: I assume you sided with the players during the NFL strike.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I sided with everybody, Phil.
Speaker 1: I happen to agree with your assessment of mayor Koch in New York City. What do you think will finally have to happen to bring his downfall?
Speaker 0: Well, I I have a feeling, and maybe it's more of a prediction. I think that the incompetence and corruption of the Koch administration will eventually lead to his resignation or his just having to be forced out because, I think he's that bad. And as Phil says, I don't like mincing words because what difference does it make? Again, I'm not running for office, so it doesn't matter. Can stand up here and unlike a lot of people that I watch, I can say what I think.
But, that's much of a prediction. I believe that the incompetence and corruption will ultimately lead to his having to get out.
Speaker 1: Hold hold on just one second. No.
Speaker 2: You keep saying you're not running for office, but why don't you? Run for mayor of New York.
Speaker 0: No. I wouldn't wanna run for mayor of New York. I'd like to see somebody talented do that. And there's a tremendous potential in New York. New York is the great city.
It's one of the great places of the world, but I really have no intention of running for me. Thank you.
Speaker 2: But you definitely are a political person whether you run for office by what everything that you say and do points points in that direction.
Speaker 0: You know what it is? I don't like being taken advantage of. Okay? And when I see a Japan ripping off this country, and I'm not saying that negative to Japan. I'm saying it from my standpoint.
I'm a businessman. I know how to deal, and some of you folks do too. When I see a total rip off of this country by Japan, where they literally have no defense budget, where we have to borrow money from them in order to get them oil and defend the Persian Gulf where most of the oil goes to Japan and other countries, not us. We get 4% of oil. When I see Kuwait, a total rip off.
We'll bring in the Bridgston. You remember the Bridgston? Their oil minister sat back and he laughed at how much money he's gonna make. Why aren't we getting some of that money? Why aren't we getting it?
They're taking in 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 of dollars, and we can't even land a helicopter on Kuwaiti soil. You tell me that's right. Saudi Arabia, they wouldn't even be there except for us. And in Saudi Arabia, we couldn't even use their minesweepers, Phil. You know it.
We said, can we use your minesweepers? Ours are old, outdated, not worth a damn. They said, no. You can't use our minesweepers to protect the Persian Gulf. I mean, it's a disgrace.
What's going on? So bottom line, Phil, I don't like being ripped off. And when I see something, I let people know. Unfortunately, nobody else does very much about it.
Speaker 1: Are you open to the political discussion that that that is provoked by this question? Why are we protecting and risking the young brave young men in the navy when we're only getting 8% of our oil from that region? Why are we there in the first place, and why don't why don't you pop off about that?
Speaker 0: I say it. I say it.
Speaker 1: We shouldn't have committed this armada in the first place to this.
Speaker 0: Well, I'll tell you what. It's not a question of committing. Before we committed, we should have had Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and a lot of other countries, and Japan paying us a hell of a lot of money for us to lose, and there's no money that can justify this, but for us to lose our men, and to be spending 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000 of dollars and we're not a wealthy nation. We're a country that's losing $200,000,000,000 a year. And we can't give farm aid, and we can't give welfare, and we can't give this and that, and right down the landline, research on AIDS and all of the problems.
And yet, Japan is making 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars a year. Now, Japan is making 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars a year. Now, again, I respect them. They have totally taken advantage of this country. You can respect them.
You can dislike them. You can do whatever you want. But they are ripping off the United States of America. Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, they're ripping off this country, and I don't like seeing it, and it shouldn't happen.
Speaker 1: And we'll be back in the next half hour.
Speaker 0: Well, they like to spread the word that they're they're not well in a mental sense and this and that. Well, that's nonsense. That's true in a certain percentage of the cases, a small percentage of the cases, but they just don't have housing. And you really need government programs to start up some housing. You need housing for low, moderate, and middle income people.
Speaker 1: Did you tell the president that when you dined with him at the White House?
Speaker 0: I tell anybody that will listen to that. I I say it very strongly. You need those programs. And if they're not in
Speaker 1: do that and have a 600 ship navy too?
Speaker 0: You can do that. Hey. Hey. Let me tell you the big problem. Okay?
If I might for a second. We're talking about $24,000,000,000 right now in this budget. It's peanuts compared to what we're losing. 200,000,000,000 more. Nobody really even knows.
If we got the money that we're entitled to from Japan, from Kuwait, from Saudi Arabia, from all of these other countries that are taking such advantage of this great country of ours, we would we wouldn't have to raise taxes. You could have all the navies you want, and you could also have all the housing you want.
Speaker 1: Right there.
Speaker 0: Because that's the Quesnela. That's the big money, Phil.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what you can't have, in my opinion, for the sake of this conversation.
Speaker 0: Go ahead.
Speaker 1: You can't have Donald Trump buying 10% of Holiday Inn or Allegiance or Bally, and then the word gets out on the street, here comes the big shark. Here comes Trump. Wham o. The stock goes up, and you bail out. And everybody who went up with you is left in the lurch after it crashes.
It's like a bunch
Speaker 0: Who are the everybody's? Hold on just a moment. Who are the everybody's? The everybody's are the Arabs from Wall Street. Together, meet an arb.
Do you think they're nice people?
Speaker 1: You're talking about Arabs?
Speaker 0: Do we feel sorry for these people? I don't think you feel sorry for these people, Phil.
Speaker 1: This, look, I'm I'm not pretending to be the first person to make this observation. This creates no jobs, makes no contribution toward the welfare and the future of of, the country. It's like a 3 4 or 5 fat cats playing a board game with each other using highly leveraged questionable paper and, a minimum down payment. And, yeah, how much you make on, how
Speaker 0: much you make on holiday? And 35,000,000 dollars,000 I read. Hey, Phil. It doesn't matter. It's too big a topic.
Let me tell you something. What about the management? You have a stockholder, and the management wants to fight. There was a deal offered last week to somebody for 55 dollars a share. The stock market dropped.
The shares are down now to $30 a year. Management said for the good of the stockholders, we're not gonna do it. Is it for the good of the stockholders, or is it to keep their own jobs? Or tell me why. Why is it for the good of the stockholders that management not sell that stock for a huge price?
So then what they do is they put all sorts of anti this, anti that in there, and the stockholders get killed because the stock goes from 55 down to 25. Tell me who gets hurt, Phil. Tell me who gets hurt. Now there are both sides of that question, and I'm not on either side. You know, you seem to think I am, but I'm not on either side.
You also have
Speaker 1: far as this game is available, I'm gonna play.
Speaker 0: No. I'm not saying that. I'm saying you also have some very good companies that maybe shouldn't be taken over, but you have some very bad managements out there that should be. And they're entrenched, making huge salaries and killing the stockholders.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Are you affiliated with any, political party? And what do you think of the, Reagan administration?
Speaker 0: Well, I'm a Republican, and the Reagan administration, was doing a great job for the psyche of the country after we went through the catastrophe previous to that. But the last couple of years have been very bad for the Reagan administration, unfortunately.
Speaker 1: Jim Wright has asked you to host the congressional democratic committee, big hula bula in Washington DC. You turned him down. That's right. Boy, I'll tell you. Did you call your father before you turned him down?
Your father your father is, in my opinion, the personification of the entrepreneurial spirit working in partnership with the government that gave housing to all those hardworking blue collar people in Queens and Brooklyn. You don't have the And his beloved son Donald is building on 5th Avenue.
Speaker 0: I feel you just don't have the programs anymore. You used to have a lot of government programs. I built a lot of the housing. I built Oh,
Speaker 1: it's Jim. Right? Maybe he's safe.
Speaker 0: You're right. You're maybe you're absolutely right.
Speaker 1: But you turned it down.
Speaker 0: It's absolutely necessary. But we can't be defending Japan, and we can't be defending Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf and everybody else, and think that we're gonna have low income housing for people, which is desperately needed. Other countries have to pay us for the services we're rendering or this country is gonna go right down the tubes, and that is a shame.
Speaker 1: And we'll be back in just a moment. Yeah. This guy's something, isn't he? I made sure the whole complex was very clean and well maintained. As I said earlier, I've always had a personal thing about cleanliness, but I also believe it's a very good investment.
For example, if you wanna sell a car and spend $5 to wash and polish it and then pile apply a little elbow grease, suddenly you find you can charge an extra $400 and get it. I can always tell a loser when I see someone with a car for sale that's filthy dirty. It's so easy to make it look better. See what I could have been if I had listened to this advice? Where are you here?
I saw. Whose hand did I see? Someone. Yes, sir. How did you leverage that 200,000 into this empire?
Speaker 0: Well, I was just asked that and I must tell you, it's just been it's it's a very difficult question to answer actually. Just time and working and a lot of luck and and a lot of principle and I don't know. It just But you said,
Speaker 1: you say in this book, this arbitrage business business is the easiest thing you've ever done. Is that so?
Speaker 0: Arbitrage or whatever you wanna call it, buying stock is is, obviously not very easy. It's it's something you can do easily in terms of making money.
Speaker 1: You've talked to me.
Speaker 0: It just seems to me it just seems to me that if a person goes out who's got credibility and buys 5% or 10% or 15% of a company, it seems to me that there's only one thing that's going to happen, and that's the stock is gonna go up. Now maybe you can tell me differently, but it just seems that the stock is going to go up.
Speaker 1: But you only need, what, 10% of the of the, cost of the acquisition. Everything else is leveraged.
Speaker 0: Well, it's not leveraged. It's not leveraged in my case. It's leveraged in some cases.
Speaker 2: Do you have any children and how many?
Speaker 0: Yes. I have 3 children.
Speaker 1: 2 boys and a girl. Is that correct? Yes, ma'am. You're you're nearing the top in your peak in your financial career. Do you have what do you see as a mountain peak in the future?
Speaker 0: Well, I don't I hope I'm not nearing the top.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
A German politician is being criminally charged for saying “Everything for Germany” in a speech under “hate speech laws”. Democrats would love nothing more than to enact these laws here…
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Absolutely insane that Donald Trump isn’t allowed to speak out against the fact that the judge’s daughter in his case has a photo of him behind bars as her profile picture because of a “gag order”.. https://t.co/KyPAcpAbvU
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
DC U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves is making clear that the DOJ is now going to target Americans who were around the Capitol on J6 but did not enter the building https://t.co/bj4i3QfHe9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many people entered the Capitol building without permission, which is a federal crime. Our focus is on prosecuting those who entered the building or engaged in violent or corrupt behavior on Capitol grounds. However, it's important to note that even those who entered the restricted area without authorization committed a federal crime. Thousands of people occupied an area where they were not allowed to be in the first place.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And what happened inside of the building. An important note when it comes to our prosecutions about those who remained outside the building. We have used our prosecutorial discretion to primarily focus on those who enter the building, or those who engage in violent or corrupt conduct on Capitol grounds. But if a person knowingly entered the restricted area without authorization, they had already committed a federal crime. Make no mistake, thousands of people occupied an area that they were not authorized to be president in in the 1st place.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
BREAKING: Alex Jones responds to Elon Musk saying he will “hear him out” regarding his account being reinstated to 𝕏 after his interview with Tucker Carlson. w/@ElijahSchaffer @ 0:29 https://t.co/56T7tgonec
Video Transcript AI Summary
Alex Jones discusses his ban from social media platforms and the attempts to silence him. He also talks about his predictions, such as the events of 9/11, and how he gathers information from various sources. Jones emphasizes the importance of perseverance and telling the truth, regardless of personal attacks. He mentions the current situation with Ukraine and the threat of war, expressing concern for the well-being of his children and the need to prevent a global conflict. Jones concludes by stating that the focus should be on stopping World War III and other pressing issues rather than personal concerns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'd like to welcome back to Slightly Offensive, a good friend of mine, a triumphant hero, and one of the greatest redemption arcs in public media history. Alex Jones, welcome back to Slightly Offensive.
Speaker 1: Well, Elijah, that's quite the intro. I don't know if I can live up to that, but it's good to Good to see you, My compatriots.
Speaker 0: ALX from The Denny Show had put up a tweet and said, Alex Jones says he hopes Elon Musk will watch his interview with Tucker Carlson, which already aired, and people are watching this. You have this video, you're on the screen, we don't need to talk about this, but shockingly enough, Elon Musk says, I will hear him out. Alex, Is Elon Musk thinking about reinstating you to, x, or what what do you make of this? What is he talking about here?
Speaker 1: Well, it's more important for free Speech is the symbol than me on Twitter. I'll be completely honest. I'm good with live news reporting. I'm great at shooting reports. I was never good at Twitter.
People were like, don't just send links out, engage people, you know, do stuff. So I was a C minus at Twitter. So but it's the sign of him really. He says he's a free speech absolutist. That that would be a huge Huge game changer.
And, of course, I was banned on Twitter for confronting Oliver Darcy, the sidekick of Brian Stelter, if that's possible. It's like the Robin to the Robin to the Robin, not the Robin to the Batman, of censors. That's why it was banned. I mean, Joe Rogan, like, 5 years ago had, Jack Dorsey and the the lawyer on, and they admitted, oh, he's banned for this. They read the code while they did it.
The guy was censoring me, Going after my advertisers, I saw him peacefully confronted him in DC as he was going into a committee hearing about me where I was attacked, but I couldn't get in and couldn't speak and couldn't confront my Accusers. And they said that it was harassment and bullying. It was a public figure trying to silence me, and I said he was a traitor And an enemy of America, and so they banned me for that. Not the things everybody hears because I never did or said the things they claim I was banned for. That's a whole another fraud with rigged courts and judges finding me guilty just like Trump in New York doesn't have a jury.
He has a, he has a judge. Well, in my case, the judges found me guilty and then I told the juries how guilty I was. So it it's definitely a big deal. You can say what you want about Elon Musk, but, he's he's not done a 180 On the tyranny, he's at about a 160, but he's going in the right direction.
Speaker 0: Well, you say that, but people are really worried about him, Alex. I I mean, you have the Neuralink going on, this sort of cyborg fusion between, artificial intelligence and humanity. He claims he doesn't believe in God. He's pushing for space exploration. People can't even decide if we've been to the moon before.
Would you say that he is a net good, or do you think he's a net evil?
Speaker 1: I would say if you go back 4 or 5 years ago, he was kind of a wash, But now, exposing global government depopulation, exposing censorship, exposing open borders, exposing Wars. I mean, overall, he's a positive. Whether he's got religion and woken up or or whether he's playing both sides because he sees liberty taking over, Christ said, Jesus said, my leader said, you judge a tree by its fruits. And so Elon Musk, as I said, is on a 160. I'd love to see a 180.
None of us are perfect. A 178, whatever, because I'm probably like a 1, you know, 170. I'm not perfect either. But I would like to see him go all the way towards liberty, and so I'm not gonna look at gift horse to mouth.
Speaker 0: And I I genuinely have to agree with that. I wanna bring Something really important here as we're talking about this. I'm super happy and I'm pumped to talk to you. Right now, as we're speaking, Owen is still in federal prison. Am am I correct on that?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Infowars talk show host with me on night on, January 6th. Didn't go in the capital, tried to stop people going in. The feds lied in his charging document, lied in as soon as the documents said that he attacked the capital. They even said he lied to the judge.
They called for perjury charges. They said he'd never worked here. You know, he's been here 7 years. So it'd be like saying Roger Staubach didn't play for the Dallas Cowboys or Perry Bradshaw didn't play for the Pittsburgh Steelers. I mean, it's it's a Incredible lie.
And then in his sentencing document that the feds gave the judge, the judge quoted 3 times this summer where he said the election was stolen With a transcript, the video link, and the judge said, I'm just gonna go ahead and give you jail time even though you're nonviolent for just being on the capital grounds, because you're nonrepentant. You're still saying Trump was robbed, which is my opinion, and the evidence is there. It did happen. We were all robbed. But Even if I'm wrong, I have a right to be wrong, so, just outrageous, but we're sending crew today.
They've already left the office here in Texas drive the 7, 8 hours, to, Louisiana to pick Owen up tomorrow, but they don't always release him on the days they say. He did have 2 months. They put him in solitary confinement the whole time rep reportedly. Only talked to his lawyers twice. But for whatever reason, they're letting him out a half month early.
So I think they isolated him so he wouldn't call out and and, you know, whatever. But but there, looks like because of congressional pressure, I know the speaker of the house Has said he was getting ready to actually go visit Owen. We had Matt Gates and others, and, you know, the wonderful MTG talk about it. So I think, I don't think I actually know. The word is is that the speaker of the house is planning to visit the prison, and so Owen is getting a little bit of a get out of jail free card.
Speaker 0: And I'm really happy about that. I just wanna remind everyone that's listening, right now and especially the crew and the staff at Infowars, how much we continue to support you guys And, you know, because a lot of people are new to this channel, Alex, people don't know that we know each other and people don't don't realize and they might not have have caught the fact that my entire awakening, into the reality of the world remains because somebody handed me and told me to watch the Obama deception on YouTube to take a look at it. I bought the DVDs. I woke up. I bought my Camus Obama t shirt.
I had the hammer and sickle, and people said that we were crazy. People said I was crazy, that Alex Jones was Crazy that I was even crazier for listening to him. How dare you think that Obama's gonna usher in a new era of communism, of intersectionality, of
Speaker 1: of of
Speaker 0: equity politics. I mean, this is 2007, 2008, people were saying, you're so insane. My principal told me you cannot wear this t shirt because it is insulting to insinuate that Obama would usher in an era of communist regime totalitarianism. I'm gonna ask you, Alex. It looks like perhaps you were pretty damn well right and correct about what the Obama era was gonna usher in.
How the hell did you know that this was gonna be the the the demarcation of the new era of communist western utopianism?
Speaker 1: Well, let's be a 100% clear. I was arrested protesting George w Bush and Repeatedly and and and protesting war. So I was not a republican or a democrat when I first got on air in, like, 1994, and and it got somewhat popular by 1996. Turning on access TV here in Austin when I was 20 years old, but again got a little radio show when I was 2022. So I I was not coming this from a partisan position.
And but then I read the documents, and I read the founding ideas of the controllers, and I learned from the think tanks who actually ran things. So I didn't support John McCain Against Obama when he ran, in, what was it, 2008? Because I knew they were both bad. It was a rigged election. But I did make a film that came out 2 weeks after Obama had been sworn.
I was making it while he already won the election. Although the Obama's efforts are still free online, it's hard to find and try to Try to suppress it. It's it it is at banned.video and infowars.com. Just go there and search the Obama deception full film. But I didn't support, Mitt Romney when he, ran 4 years later against Obama.
I knew that it was a Stand in. It was loyal opposition mistake. But when I saw Donald Trump come on the scene and what they did and what happened, I saw the telltale signs that Trump was for real. Didn't mean he was perfect, but he was definitely not with the system. I got behind him.
So, yeah, I mean, if you go into the club of Rome, the CFR, the triblateral commission, the Bilderberg group, the I mean, I mean, I've been at Bilderberg group, events in Europe and in in the US where a guy on a motorcycle pulls up Where a guy comes to the hotel we're at at night, and lord knows how he knew where we were staying. And he goes, here's a satchel of documents. It's happened a couple times, And it was all just secret classified Bilderberg meetings in the sixties, seventies, eighties, both times. I put that on air. And, I mean, it turned out they were real documents about their plan for world government, deindustrialization, erasing our borders.
So I knew then, Man, there really is a global government getting set up at senate apartment memorandum 200 and Henry Kissinger and Zabigdor Brzezinski. So I knew this was all real. And plus my uncle was an army officer and, was involved in Iran contra. He told me about it, and I I had, My dad's uncle, you know, was a, army special operations assassin. They didn't tell me much, but, you know, before he died, they told me some stuff.
And and so I kinda grew up not being, naive. And and so I I kinda had a leg up on this. So I knew they were trying this, and and I read the stuff the global throughout the fifties. It was done by the seventies. I read the stuff they planned in the seventies.
It was done by the nineties. So when I was reading in the nineties, what they were planning for the 2000, I said, I gotta oppose this. And I said, I'll be attacked for saying all this craziness, But people will remember it. Common sense. And then once it comes true, I'll know the next leg of their operation.
They'll listen to me at that point. That's really the story of Infowars. That's why we've been so successful.
Speaker 0: Well, it's also interesting. I remember you told me a couple of years ago, this is during the height the scandemic. Obviously, Infowars was off the cusp of of prediction, so were we, and we've seen, time and time again, you know, they tell us what they're going to do. And I remember asking you about 911, and you were like, it was very clear. Like, they were they were basically explaining what they were going to do, and people I don't think understood that at the time.
That's more of a modern, you know, accessible social media world where We're we're starting to get used to people, you know, going to magazines, boasting about rigging elections, you know, people talking, as we
Speaker 1: saw Yeah. Time Magazine, the Democrats of 2 months after they stole the election. There's how we did it with the headline. You're asking a really good question, Elijah, if I'm getting this right. How did I know that 911 was gonna happen in July of 2000 2001.
How did I say call the White House, tell them don't blow the World Trade Center, and blame it on their asset bid lot? How did I know that? And and and and there's a big controversy About did Alex Jones learn this from William Cooper? I think William Cooper was a really smart, amazing, interesting talk show host. Back then, though, he was on a very small shortwave station.
He didn't have Internet, archives, so I never really heard William Cooper. I read his book. I've been sent by listeners a few times, maybe 10 times or so, cassettes of his show, including when he attacked me, and I thought, but this is entertaining as hell. I mean, he was a better talk show than I was when I'm, like, you know, 26, 27 years old, and this guy is calling me the devil incarnate. And and and and and and I interviewed Cooper, but I didn't go on air and say call the white house, tell them about the World Trade Center because of Cooper.
Cooper saw the same thing I was seeing. I didn't even hear him say this, where he said, hey. They're gonna blame bin Laden for something. They're saying he's about to attack us. He's really CIA.
Why can the government find him in his caves when the CIA can't find it for a decade? Well, I didn't get that from Wayne Cooper. I got it from the x files lone gunman that aired 8 months before 911, A few months before Cooper talked about it, a few months before I did, where Chris Carter later admitted the CIA came to him. This is in the, like, Vanity Fair Newspapers. You can look it up.
A a a variety. Not very fair. And and they said, we want you to do an episode of the lone gunman next fall spin off Where the government hijacks a jumbo jet to fly the World Trade Center to bring in martial law and invade Afghanistan. So I at the time, I I was on air saying, That was, like, a 30 second clip. I did hours where I said, there's a lone gunman episode.
I didn't talk to Chris Carter for, like, 6, 7, 8 years later. I've talked to him since he said, yeah. The CIA told me and even told the newspaper that. So it's incredible. And so it's Chris Carter, but but it wasn't as Chris Carter.
Then I was watching CNN, and they had, Harry Hart and and another senator on the ran ransom commission. It Was a heart rubbing commission. The point was that they say life's about to end. Big buildings are about to come down. We need to have surveillance and control.
And I went, wait a minute. The feds cooked the bomb And train the driver in 1992 that I'd already interviewed interviewed, like, 5, 6 times, Ahmad Salam, who was CIA trained Egyptian intelligence, Who went to the FBI and said, okay, they wanna bomb the World Trade Center. And they said, Salam, we want you to build the bomb, But we want you to not let it detonate all the day. But before that happened, they said, let it go ahead and detonate. So I'd already interviewed who was already in mainstream news, Ahmad Salam, how the feds enabled the bombers.
So I had a that point and and x files, and They were on the news every night. Oh my god. Bin Laden's about to attack. He's about to kill everybody, give your rights up when he attacks. And I went on air, and I put all his points together and a bunch I didn't mention for time, Elijah.
And I said the deep state's gonna blow up the World Trade Center. They're probably gonna use airplanes. So Cooper just said they're gonna blame Bin Laden for something. Didn't even know he said that till later. People dredged up.
Great. He was a great smart guy. Nothing against him. God, baby veteran, wonderful guy. The point is I'm telling people the providence of where I got it because other people can do this too.
It was all the signs and all the points, and They bombed it before, and they were saying he's gonna attack. And when he attacks, it's a new way of life. And op eds, the Austin American statesman, where I live saying, terror's coming. When it comes, give up your rights. Yep.
The guy that records currently saying blinking red lights everywhere. You know, give your rights away with a terrorist attack. You know, the border's wide open. And so I specifically said they're They're gonna blow up the World Trade Center, probably fly planes into it, Lebanon bin Laden, have a war on terror, but set up a police state to control the American people, and I dead called it From all the data, just like Cooper's dead in the grave. Nothing against Cooper.
People to realize they can do this too. You don't have to imagine some guru gave it to you. You can see the signs. I remember in, October of 2021 saying Russia's gonna invade by the end of February, And this is a giant proxy war because I had enough data points. Or when I said Jesse Ventura 11 years ago on his national show, they're gonna release a virus that attacks immune system, use it for lockdowns.
You won't be able to go outside or make you make you wear mask. I had Rockefeller documents that said that. So I've always said on air, here's where I got this. People cut that out. They then because I'll give people credit whoever they are.
You know what I mean? You know? I don't no. I'm not I'm not portending this. I'm not divining this.
I'm not reading chicken guts and tea leaves or looking into a crystal ball. I'm trying to teach people how I've learned this information. And so I've done it over and over and over and over again Because you can see the trajectory of of of of where this is going. So that's how I was able I tried to stop it. I mean, I didn't just do 1 show, and we're trying to find the original tape.
Well, I didn't I didn't oh, and oh, and Chase Geiser, one of our great crew members here, who uses AI to scan all my old recordings that they found online somewhere. They found me in the spring before William Cooper. And I've thought about who did it first, which is true, saying we've seen the clip we wanted Elijah saying they're gonna fly jets in the World Trade Center for martial law. I didn't even know I'd said that. But, again, it was all they were programming the subconscious.
It was everywhere. And so It isn't about who predicts it. It's about getting the public to be able to see what we see. That's what this is all about. Does that make sense?
Speaker 0: Well, it does, and one of the interesting things, I know you just had this interview with Tucker and I need to bring up this story because I watched this, Alex. I've watched this. I've seen you be the canary for what they continue to try to do to a lot of people. You are a beloved figure in the right wing. You're getting a lot right and they focus on the things that you don't get right.
When you get it right, they clip up the, what you say on the show so that it looks like you just made shit up or that you're not legitimately getting these from reliable sources. They don't name your sources and then what happened? Well, I mean, if people aren't familiar with recent history and I'm learning this, by the way, this is good news. I'm learning a lot of people don't know this basic like political history, which means a lot of people are getting red pill. The lot of new people are waking up today.
I'm very encouraged by that. The people don't know what's been going on because they're just waking up after the pandemic. They're going, oh my gosh, this has been crazy is Alex. They removed him from each and every social media platform for some different accusation. And before people could question, before people could ask, hey, why did we remove Alex Jones?
What they did is they nailed him with Sandy Hook accusations, which I completely we're not going to get into, I believe are completely bullshit. We're gonna go through that. Anything he'd gone wrong, he'd apologized for. And now what they cemented is this narrative. Alex Jones was banned off the Internet for questioning certain narratives surrounding official federal interpretations of Sandy Hook, which is false.
And so I wanna talk about this, Alex, how they had this multiple year plan. You did a no no. You started predicting big things like September 11th. You started predicting big things. They silenced you.
It didn't work. And now they try to cement, hey, we got to keep this guy down, but now people, I want to bring up this tweet. This is why. People like Tucker Carlson. What is going on here?
Tucker Carlson sounds a lot like conspiracy theorist, Alex Jones. The Biden administration, he says here, is openly threatening Americans over Ukraine. In a classified briefing in the house yesterday, defense secretary Lloyd Austin informed members that if they don't appropriate more money to Zelensky in, I'm interjecting this, for the war in Ukraine to continue this global hegemony, he says, we'll send your uncles, cousins and sons to fight Russia, pay the oligarchs or we'll kill your kids is what he's saying and Elon Musk responded on the most important public forum in world history, he really said this? And Tucker said, he really did confirmed. And now you know why they were trying to silence you, Alex, because if even Tucker Carlson, who has a lot to lose as well.
People like Elon Musk are waking up. They were afraid if they didn't silence you that exactly what's happening today would happen and the silencing didn't work on you, Alex. It didn't work. How do you feel about this? I feel like your redemption, I mean, with me, I've known, all your good friends have known, your audience has known that you were correct, but it's coming out.
Hey. Alex Jones wasn't crazy. He was trying to warn us. They tried to make him look crazy and they tried to silence him, but guess what? It's not Alex Jones ideas that are coming popular again.
It's the Truth, it's the exposing of darkness. It's the exposing of the global order that you've been parroting. How do you feel about the fact that you've been proven correct and that they are being proven the people who came against you are being proven as phony smear tactics, slandering oligarchs And in the end, it looks like you were right the whole time.
Speaker 1: Well, that's a lot to unpack. That was an amazing rant. I'm gonna air this on my own show. That's okay with you, the next few days. She's like, I couldn't say it actually.
I couldn't say it that well. Gosh. There was so there was so much there. Let me say this. I wanted to right before I came on with you, like, 20 minutes ago, I was like, I gotta talk about World War 3 and what Biden did, Not talk about myself, but it's important to talk about myself because it's a microcosm of what they're doing to everybody else.
But but but let's just go back to what you said at the end there Or close to the end. Yeah. Tucker's got his sources. Like, when he said the NSA spying on me, and a month later, they confirmed it. Tucker is the gold standard, never BS's.
The guy is is is an angel. But we already have Biden yesterday Saying, if we don't give a $106,000,000,000 to Ukraine, if you don't give us this funding, we're gonna have troops on the ground in Ukraine in World War 3. So that's holding the world hostage, putting a gun to our head, Saying, if you don't go along with this, we're gonna expand the war. And then we learn from congressional sources, The same thing's being told to congress as they're held hostage. And and and and then it just gets worse.
This is a This is a dying regime, and and and, you know, this is Here's a headline I wrote today for Infowars. Red alert broadcast. Biden holds planet hostage threat to direct war with Russia if Congress doesn't deliver a 106,000,000,000 to Zelensky. This is nuclear blackmail. So that's that's that's the big story.
But you've gotta understand how we got here. And so, yeah, I didn't know what was hand What was happening with the Sandy Hook stuff 5 years ago? Because I'd never been the complete target of the deep state. I mean, they did more propaganda on me than before they invented Iraq The first time of this I mean, literally thousands of articles a week, hundreds of TV programs. I'm the devil.
I'm Satan. I'm deplatformed. Turns 5 years ago, 6 years ago. And then they deplatforming for no reason, so they went looked at my timeline And, like, went back 5, 6 years to a few shows I did where I just questioned things and agreed with callers, and then they had PR firms. They've since then bragged about it, say that I was peeing on graves, attacking people's houses, never any proof, never any witnesses, and they just kept saying, Alex Jones won't stop attacking our houses.
He's coming to our house. He's peeing on our graves. And I'm like, what? And I'm so I go, hey. Hey.
I never actually thought that was completely staged. I don't know. I believe you're real. And as soon as because they kept saying, just apologize. So I said, fine.
I'm not the Sandy Hook guy. I believe your kids died. They went, we got you. You just admitted you lied to get famous off us. I never even wasn't a blip on the radar.
I'm sad their kids died. It was like a small news story in the overall compendium. You know, we got 20,000,000 dead from the poison shots and the rest of it now. So then I went through judges finding me guilty, no jury trials, You know, just all the same stuff Trump's going through. So now they all brag, New York Times.
Yeah. We had PR firms. Kinda like you said the start of the interview that that Time Magazine. Here's how we did it. The intelligence agencies in both parties, we got Trump.
They did the same thing. This is how we got Jones. They brag. They monologue about it. And so, yeah, that tool they used on me was a beta test and all the weaponization and and and and the, like, irrational hearings will come out.
So that's what happened there. And I just feel sorry for the people that were sucked into it, but you just move on from that. But, yeah, here here here here's the icing on the cake. Here's the cherry on top. Here's the happy ending.
Here's the here's the silver lining. They thought intimidating people through attacking me or trying to intimidate people. They thought trying to destroy me Would be an example of everybody else's shut up or you're next. But humans aren't like that, at least a large portion of them. When they wipe everybody out the Alamo, That didn't make Texas back down.
It made him stand up and fight harder. And so because of my audience because of my crew, because of everything, we persevere and just believe no matter what happens to me, I've gotta keep telling the truth. Let's see the ripples in the pond. What I do today isn't about me. It's about who it affects.
So even though I'm I'm this demonized person that that they wanna set up as the archetype of evil, because I'm the populous good guy trying to fight corruption. I'm not perfect. I make mistakes. I realized I've gotta just keep fighting. It is about me.
So because I did that, we outpersevered them. And now all their devastation, all their world government, all their Islamic invasion, all their open borders, all Israel standing down To Hamas, which be be said on on October 7th, and now it's confirmed. And the insider trading, it's all come out that it's not Hamas or Israel. It's a group above both. And so we've really reached this magic moment now.
The problem is an elite that's punch drunk, an elite that's power drunk, An elite that's never been stopped, an elite that believes their megalomaniacal invincibility can take them to the stars. Now they're saying, you give me a $106,000,000, We're going to nuclear war, and US troops are going in, and your sons and daughters are dying. We can't let, quote, Russia win when 9 years ago, the west started this war on record, overthrowing the Ukrainian government. And then you know you're in the hands of psychotics, and then you're not worried about how it ends for Alex Jones. You're not worried about your name or getting back on Twitter.
You're trying to stop World War 3 because you got 4 children. And so as soon as you don't care because I remember I'm on the air almost 30 years. And a couple years in, they'd have stalkers come after me. I've got a sister that's 15 years younger. They'd come to her middle school and threaten to kill her, And they'd call my numbers and wait outside for me, and I remember God said, forgive them and stop caring.
And it was like as soon as I metaphysically, Didn't care about the stalkers anymore. They just went away. And it's the same thing. I'm not worried about me, Elijah. I'm worried about nuclear war and financial collapse and the fentanyl deaths.
And as soon as we just keep telling the truth and don't worry about ourselves, that's when God kicks in. And I think we're hitting that point because we're so close to destruction. It's a paradox. Are we winning? Are we losing?
Well, it's a knife's edge, but Because the hour is so late because the things are so serious, we're really in magic hour right now.
Speaker 0: It definitely feels, and I mean this genuinely, it definitely feels like whatever happens in the next 12 months that people need to be prepared that whatever they need to do, that they are going to do, and this is not going to wait till agenda 2030 as we're we're already experiencing it today. I The battle of the war is now. The second half of this interview can be found only at censored.tv. V. You can support the show directly by getting a Censored TV membership.
Just type in c e n s o red.tv here. Use my promo code offensive, o f f e n s I v e. Click the link in the description slash the pinned comment, and you can find this show plus my nightly live streams which are completely ad free for your viewing pleasure and continue to keep independent media and journalism alive.
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Vivek just told Chris Christie to get off stage and enjoy a nice meal 🤣 https://t.co/oXLCQYgqSl
Video Transcript AI Summary
Chris Christie is criticized for his lack of knowledge about the provinces in Eastern Ukraine. The speaker mocks Christie's claim of having foreign policy experience by referencing his involvement in the bridge closure between New Jersey and New York. The speaker suggests that Christie should leave the stage and enjoy a meal elsewhere. The transcript abruptly ends without further information about Nikki.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First of all, Chris Christie also doesn't know what provinces in Eastern Ukraine he actually want us to fight for. Chris, your version of foreign policy experience was closing a bridge from New Jersey to New York. Yeah. So do everybody a favor. Just walk yourself off that stage, enjoy a nice meal Yeah.
And get the hell out of this place. That'd be cool. When it comes to Nikki
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
Big brands were more than happy to advertise on Twitter 1.0 when they deplatformed a sitting President of the United States and interfered in elections but they now want to pull out because 𝕏 supports Free Speech. Really makes you think..
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
The new rules are if you advertise on a platform, you must support all content on the there Have @Apple @IBM @Lionsgate @StateFarm @Comcast @HomeDepot @Disney @SearchlightPics @ParamountPics @McDonalds pulled ads on Meta? If not, they need to be asked why they support this
@alx - ALX 🇺🇸
BREAKING: Elon Musk to advertisers trying to blackmail 𝕏 into censorship: “Go f*ck yourself.” https://t.co/cfH3ThOXNh
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses the public perception of an apology tour and clarifies their stance. They express their disapproval of advertisers trying to blackmail them with money and emphasize that they don't want them to advertise. The speaker discusses the potential need to shift away from advertising in their business model. They mention Linda Yaccarino's role in selling advertising and argue that the advertising boycott will harm the company. The speaker predicts that advertisers will blame them for the company's demise due to their inappropriate statements on the platform. They challenge Earth's response to this accusation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Obviously, you know that there's a public perception that and and and you're clarifying this now, but there's a public perception that that was part of a apology tour, if you will. That this had been said online. There was all of the criticism. There was advertisers. We even we talked to Bob Iger today.
I hope they Hey. Up. You hope
Speaker 1: don't advertise. You don't want them to advertise? No.
Speaker 0: What do you mean?
Speaker 1: If if somebody's gonna try to blackmail me with advertising, blackmail me with money, go fuck yourself.
Speaker 0: But
Speaker 1: Go fuck yourself. Is that clear?
Speaker 0: I hope
Speaker 1: it is.
Speaker 0: Hey Bob,
Speaker 1: if you're a new audience.
Speaker 0: Well, let me ask you then. That's how I feel. Don't advertise. How do you think then about the economics of of X? If if if if part of the underlying model, at least today, and maybe it needs to shift.
Maybe the answer is it needs to shift away from advertising. If if you believe that this is the one part of your business where you would be beholden to those who, have this view. What do you do? F y. I understand, but there's a reality too.
Right? Yes. No. No. I mean, Linda Yaccarino's right here, and she's gotta sell advertising.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. So, no. No. Tell tell you. So so what no.
No. Actually, what what this advertising boycott is, is is gonna do, it's it's gonna kill a company. And do you think that that But and the whole world will know that those advertisers killed company. And we will document it in great detail.
Speaker 0: But there are those advertisers, I imagine, are gonna say they're gonna say, we didn't kill the company. Oh, yeah. They're gonna say Tell it to tell it to Earth. But they're gonna gonna say that they're gonna say, Elon, that you killed the company because you said these things, and that they were inappropriate things, and that they didn't feel comfortable on the platform. Right?
That's that's
Speaker 1: what they're gonna say. And let's see how Earth responds to that.
Speaker 0: So may okay. This then this