reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @angelwoman501

Posted - June 11, 2025 at 9:21 PM

Saved - June 12, 2025 at 4:02 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Gavin Newsom is facing serious criticism as he appears emotional on camera while California struggles with chaos. This moment highlights what I see as a lack of effective leadership, prioritizing theatrics over real action against crime. Many Californians feel more threatened by the state of their streets and the governor's decisions than by President Trump. It seems to me that while Trump is taking charge, Newsom is merely performing for attention, reminiscent of a character in a dramatic film.

@angelwoman501 - Patriot Lady

Gavin Newscum is on the Titanic, and he's going down hard. Newsom crying on camera while LA burns is the peak of Democrat leadership and emotional theatrics instead of action to prevent lawless thugs from terrorizing his state. Californians are not scared of President Trump. They're scared of the lawless streets, illegal invaders, and a governor who protects rioters over citizens. President Trump is leading, Newsom is auditioning for a spot in a Lifetime for Liberal Women's Saturday night movie.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Donald Trump, without consulting California law enforcement, commandeered 2,000 of the state's national partners to deploy them illegally and for no reason. This abuse of power by the president inflamed the situation, putting people, officers, and the national guard in danger. That's when the downward spiral began.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Donald Trump, without consulting California law enforcement leaders, commandeered 2,000 of our state's national partners to deploy their streets illegally and for no reason. This brazen abuse of power by a city president inflamed the combustible situation, putting our people, our officers, and even our national guard in their midst. That's when the downward spiral

@angelwoman501 — Patriot Lady

Posted - March 13, 2025 at 7:28 PM

Saved - March 14, 2025 at 2:23 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A user criticized a federal judge for blocking President Trump's cuts to DEI teacher training, questioning when the Supreme Court would intervene. Another user asked if the issue had already been litigated, implying that the matter may have been previously addressed.

@angelwoman501 - Patriot Lady

This is another federal activist judge who has blocked President Trump's cuts to DEI teacher training. When is SCOTUS going to put a stop to these judges interfering with President Trump's article II rights? https://t.co/s3bJbENymI

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

Meet the federal Judge who just blocked President Trump’s cuts to DEI teacher training. His resume is full of DEI activism, he served on the board of groups currently suing President Trump, and trained far-left activists how to avoid arrests during protests. 🧵🧵🧵 https://t.co/KSp77nbT2X

@SuDoSilverKnife - SudoSilverKnife

@angelwoman501 Wasn't this already litigated?

@angelwoman501 — Patriot Lady

Posted - March 13, 2025 at 7:28 PM

Saved - March 14, 2025 at 1:11 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The discussion centers on a federal judge blocking President Trump's cuts to DEI teacher training, prompting concerns about judicial overreach. One participant argues that the judiciary is unconstitutionally influenced by popular vote, undermining the rule of law and equal protection. They assert that this creates an anti-Republican democracy rather than a constitutional republic, as outlined in Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution. The conversation emphasizes the need for an independent judiciary and proper representation to restore constitutional governance.

@angelwoman501 - Patriot Lady

This is another federal activist judge who has blocked President Trump's cuts to DEI teacher training. When is SCOTUS going to put a stop to these judges interfering with President Trump's article II rights? https://t.co/s3bJbENymI

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

Meet the federal Judge who just blocked President Trump’s cuts to DEI teacher training. His resume is full of DEI activism, he served on the board of groups currently suing President Trump, and trained far-left activists how to avoid arrests during protests. 🧵🧵🧵 https://t.co/KSp77nbT2X

@NGorhamA4S4 - NGorhamA4S4 💫🇺🇸💫

@angelwoman501 @Ikennect This Is Why It Is Happening. There Is NO RULE OF LAW, Or Equal Protection Under The Law, When State And Federal Judiciary Are Seated Unconstitutionally Via Direct And Indirect Popular Vote, From The Most Populace Counties, And Cities In Those Counties, In All 50 States, Territories And Possessions. That Form Of Government Is A Anti-Republican Unconstitutional Representative Constitutional Democracy. Which Is Unconstitutional As Per Article Four Section Four Of The United States Constitution, Which Says; “Guarantee Clause ARTICLE IV, SECTION 4 The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.” There Are Supposed To Be Three Voices Represented In Our Federal Government, Hence The Three Branches. The Voice Of The People, Represented In State And Federal Houses Of Representatives. The Voice Of The State Represented In State And Federal Senates. The Voice Of The Law, The State And Federal Judiciary. Right Now, Which Is The Problem, The Voice Of The People, Which Is Already Represented In State And Federal Houses Of Representatives, Via Direct Popular Vote. Seats The Voice Of The State And The Law From The Same Voting Pool, Which Is Only The Most Populous Counties, And Cities In Those Counties. That Means, ONLY That Voting Pool Has Any Representation In Our State And Federal Government. And That Form Of Government Is A Unconstitutional Democracy Form Of Government, As Per Article Four Section Four Of The United States Constitution. Which Says The United States Shall Guarantee A Republican Form Of Government To The States, And NOT A MOB Seated Democracy! It Is Impossible To Be A Constitutional Republic, When State And Federal Judiciary Are Seated By Direct And Indirect Popular Vote, ONLY From The Most Populous Counties And Cities In Them Because They Have The Population Density To Do So, That Being THE MOB, The Voice Of The People, Which Also Seats State And Federal Houses Of Representatives, State And Federal Senates, ALL From That Same Pool Of Voters, Directly Or Indirectly. There Is NO Equal Protection Under The Law By Such A Unconstitutional Democratic Form Of State And Federal Government. Being Unconstitutional, As Per Article Four Section Four Of The United States Constitution, Says The United States Shall Guarantee A Republican Form Of Government To The States, Which It Has Not Since 1849, Via Luther v Borden, Which Set Into Motion Other Individual States, Seating State Judiciary Via Direct Popular Vote. What Made The United States The Constitutional Republic We Started Out As Was The Guarantee Of A Republican Form Of Government To The States, Which Means Independent State Judiciary, Seated By The State Senate, State District Court And Above To Include State Supreme Court, As The State Senate Is Representative Of The State As A Whole As The Voice Of The State, Where As The Voice Of The People Is Representative Of The Population Centers, And Cities In Them, As They Have The Population Density To Cancel Out The Rural Areas Of The State. When ALL Of That Is Achieved In All Of The States, That Creates The Constitutional Republic, With The Voice Of The State, Residing In The United States Senate, Seated There To Seat A Independent Federal Judiciary, Those Senators Being Chosen In Full And Open Sessions Of State Legislatures, To Seat Them There. ALL Of THAT Is What Made Us A Constitutional Republic. That Does NOT Exist Today, What Exists In State And Federal Government, Are A Anti-Republican Democratic Form Of State And Federal Government, Masquerading As A Constitutional Republic, Which It Is Not!

@NGorhamA4S4 - NGorhamA4S4 💫🇺🇸💫

@angelwoman501 @Ikennect @angelwoman501 @Ikennect This Is How To End It. 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇

@NGorhamA4S4 - NGorhamA4S4 💫🇺🇸💫

Constitutionally Sound Plan To Fix Everything. All 50 States Territories And Possessions Must Replace Their Unconstitutional Bicameral Representative Constitutional Democracy State Government With A Republican Form As Per Article Four Section Four Of The United States Constitution Says. To Do That You Must Have Independent State Judiciaries. To Achieve That, Below State District Court, Must Be Seated By Direct Popular Vote. Because The Judge Seated There Will Have Something In Common With Cases Appearing There Because They All Reside In The Same Geographic Location. That Means, State District Court And Above To Include State Supreme Court MUST Be Seated By The State Senate, As That Body Is Representative Of The Entire State, And NOT Just The Most Populous Counties, And Cities In It. To Fix The Federal Level Representation Of The State In The United States Senate. The 17th Amendment MUST BE Repealed. United States Senators Must Be Chosen In A Full And Open Session Of The State Legislature ONLY. NOT The House Submitting A Candidate, Not The Senate Submitting One, Not The Governor Submitting One, Not Committees Submitting One, Not Major Political Parties, Submitting One. But Individual Legislators From Either State House Of Representatives Or State Senate Submitting A Candidate, Before State Legislature As A Whole. And Then That Body ONLY Choosing The Voice Of The State, In The United State Senate. When Done That Way, The United States Senate, Can Seat A Proper Federal Judiciary And Not One Seated By The Most Populous Counties And Cities Nation Wide. That Entire Process Creates Independent State And Federal Judiciaries, And A Republican Form Of State And Federal Government. Which You CAN NOT DO, Unless Your State Government Has Reinstated A Republican Form Of State Government. The Authority To Determine What A Republican Form Of State Government Is Resides With The Executive Branch Of Our Federal Government. The President Of The United States. It's That Way Because The President Has An Army At His Command To ENFORCE That Determination. Example, Is RECONSTRUCTION. Which WAS NOT Completed At The End Of The At The End Of The Civil War. The Supreme Court Majority Decision In The Case Of Luther v Borden, Explains This Authority VERY Clearly. That Case Was About The Dorr Rebellion In Rhode Island, In 1849, Which Ruled Wrongly That The Remnant Of The King Charles Charter That Was In The State, Was The Correct Form Of State Government And Not The Republican Form That Was Set Up In Rebellion, Which Was Wiped Out. So. To Fix What We Have Now, We MUST Complete Reconstruction, For A Minimum Of Three Election Cycles, To Properly Reseat State And Federal Judiciaries As I Have Previously Explained. Once All Of That Is Done, Then We Will Be A Tricameral Representative Constitutional Republic Again, With Independent State And Federal Judiciaries. In My View, President Trump Must Be President, And Via A Presidential Emergency Action Document, Using The Constitutional Authority Given To President Of The United States, As Per Article Four Section Four, Which Says; Guarantee Clause ARTICLE IV, SECTION 4 The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence. As President Of The United States And Head Of The Executive Branch Our Federal Government, He Would Direct All 50 States Territories And Possessions To Reform Thier Governments As I Have Explained. Once Done Via Reconstruction, Which WILL BE NECESSARY, Because Not Every State Will Want To Comply. Then The Article V, Can Be Convened, For The Express Purpose ONLY, Of Repealing The 17th Amendment. So, EVERY THING, Can Be Fixed Using The Constitutional Authority, That Already Exists, Via Executive Branch Of Our Federal Government. Continuing…

@angelwoman501 — Patriot Lady

Posted - March 13, 2025 at 7:28 PM

Saved - March 13, 2025 at 11:53 PM

@angelwoman501 - Patriot Lady

This is another federal activist judge who has blocked President Trump's cuts to DEI teacher training. When is SCOTUS going to put a stop to these judges interfering with President Trump's article II rights? https://t.co/s3bJbENymI

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

Meet the federal Judge who just blocked President Trump’s cuts to DEI teacher training. His resume is full of DEI activism, he served on the board of groups currently suing President Trump, and trained far-left activists how to avoid arrests during protests. 🧵🧵🧵 https://t.co/KSp77nbT2X

@angelwoman501 — Patriot Lady

Posted - February 25, 2025 at 3:53 AM

Saved - February 25, 2025 at 11:08 AM

@angelwoman501 - Patriot Lady

@DanCrenshawTX Remember when you lied about Eddie Gallagher and tried to send him to prison for life? You are 🗑. Tucker was right. You are a liberal fraud. https://t.co/lthMTg4LPi

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

Whenever Dan Crenshaw’s name trends, I’ll be posting this clip of Navy SEAL Chief Eddie Gallagher’s thoughts on him. https://t.co/Evby4Mfohh

Video Transcript AI Summary

Back in 2019, I was charged with war crimes and faced life in prison. While my family and teammates worked to expose the lies surrounding my case, Dan Crenshaw's name kept surfacing. Despite being a former SEAL, Crenshaw initially said he'd wait and see, then later claimed there wasn't enough information to help. While 50 congressmen signed a petition for my release, Crenshaw wrote his own petition to keep me imprisoned but allow me to see my lawyers. After I was found not guilty, I ran into Crenshaw at an event, but he ignored me. I later learned he actively worked against me, telling congressmen I was guilty and to butt out. Crenshaw's a liar, and I can prove it with emails and documents. This isn't about me; it's about the American people knowing who they're voting for. Just because someone is a SEAL or was wounded in combat doesn't automatically make them a good person.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hey, what's up everybody? So I've got something to say that I've been holding onto for about four and a half years now. I've tried to deal with this internally. It's been weighing me down for some time. I've tried to just let it go, just like I have with the whole nightmare that happened to me and my family. But I feel compelled to come out now and speak the truth about a certain individual. This is not about me. I'm not trying to get into a petty little back and forth match with this person. This is about you, the American people, no matter what side of the aisle that you sit on. This is also, and most importantly to me, about my teammates and the SEAL teams. I feel like you guys should know the truth as well. So back in 02/2019, I was charged with war crimes, premeditated murder, and, I was facing life in prison without parole. I sat in pretrial confinement for about nine months before my actual trial. During that time, my wife, Andrea, and brother Sean, along with a certain group of teammates that I had were doing everything they could to garner support, to get the truth out about what was going on with me, to expose all the lies and corruption around the UCMJ and everything they were doing to put me away for life. During that time, one name kept popping up. That was Dan Crenshaw. My brother wanted to go speak to him, to try and get his support, as well as my teammates who were doing everything they could. And this was for obvious reasons. Dan was a prior SEAL. They thought that this was a no brainer and that he should get behind it, especially with all the information that was coming out. So my brother who lives near DC was going to Congress almost on a daily basis, knocking on every Congressman's door on both sides of the aisle, trying to get them to look at what was really going on and get their support. One of those individuals was Dan Crenshaw. So my brother ended up talking to his staff a couple of times. They gave him the runaround, but that did not stop him. He kept going back day after day and finally got ahold of Dan. Dan told him he wanted to wait till the situation developed before he made a decision, which got it. That makes sense. Along with that, some of my teammates who were on that deployment, who were on the ground the day of the incident, went to one of Crenshaw's fundraising parties, pulled him aside and spoke to him face to face, told him what was happening to me was complete BS, that it was chock full of lies, and that I was getting screwed over. Dan told them he'll see what he can do. Once my brother got ahold of Dan, he said, once my brother got ahold of him a second time, Dan said that there wasn't enough information or whatever. My brother got pretty frustrated and ended up sending Dan a semi scathing email, calling him out for being a politician and not being part of the brotherhood and not supporting a fellow seal. Dan replied to him and said that he would see what he could do. So as my incarceration went on, and it was late into my incarceration when 50 congressmen ended up signing a petition to release me from prison so I could properly defend myself before trial. They basically were saying, give this man the constitutional rights he deserves before he goes to trial for his life. One congressman would not sign that petition. That was Dan Crenshaw. Instead, he decided to write his own petition and pretty much say I to keep me in prison, but just to let me see my lawyers, which were rights I should have already had in the first place. At that point, we decided to scrap asking Dan for help and just move on. No harm, no foul. So obviously, I went to trial, was found not guilty, and ended up retiring out of the Navy. Not long after I retired, I got invited to a Turning Point event by Nine Line. While at that event, I just happened to run into Dan Crenshaw. I saw him coming down the hallway, and I wanted to go up and talk to him just to get his thoughts on the whole situation and why he did not support me or why he made up his own petition saying to keep me in prison. I was not angry. I just wanted to talk to him team guy to team guy to get his thoughts. He saw me from down the hall and immediately looked down at the ground and speed walked right past me. Didn't even give me the time of day. So at that point, I was like, all right. You know, he's a politician. I can kinda understand why he didn't wanna support if it would hurt him in some some capacity. So I just let it go. Not too long after that, I obviously wrote the book. And when the book came out, I went to Congress to do a book signing for the 50 congressmen who did support me, who did sign that petition to get me out of prison. While there, I was pulled aside by multiple congressmen and was told that Dan Crenshaw was actively working against me behind the scenes. He was going up to each of those congressmen who were supporting me telling him telling them not to support me, that I was guilty, and that it was his community, and they needed to butt out and let him handle it. I don't know how much of an arrogant statement that can be made that Dan said it's his community. That's a joke. But regardless, after hearing this, I was pretty disgusted. It's one thing to not support me and just to back off and not do anything. But Dan, knowing the full well the truth about what was really going on, still went and tried to get people not to support me and pretty much try and put me away for life without parole. The way I look at that is Dan was trying to kill me. He was doing this for political favor. He was doing this to climb the political ladder. The reason I'm putting this out right now or I'm putting this out right now is because if Dan Crenshaw is willing to lie, to gain favor with other politicians, to climb that political ladder, and pretty much throw somebody away for life, what do you think he's doing to the American people? This man cannot stop lying, and I'll give you some examples. Recently, Dan or David Goggins was on a podcast with my good friend Aaron Singerman. I listened to the podcast. I listened to him expose Dan for who he really is. After that podcast, after I listened to the podcast, I DM'd Dave Goggins and said, great job on exposing Dan, only because I know the truth about him and what he did to me. Now I had no communications with Goggins before this. Me and him really did not know each other. But after I sent him that DM, he then sent me a text message back. And after I read it, this is what really compelled me to come forward and do what I'm doing now. And I'll read you the text. And this is from Crenshaw to Goggins. Hey, man. Listen to your Rogan podcast, good shit. I had no idea about any of that shit with that team six guy making YouTube videos about you and all that. Again, sorry if I made it seem like I was ever in that category. I am not. I wouldn't have tried to get you to speak at my events if I didn't respect you and your message. Like you, I've been in the public eye since about 02/2018 and understand very well how people will climb over your back to get higher, get more clicks, and get a lit more little more famous. Pieces of shit like Eddie Gallagher have tried to do that at my expense after I tried helping him get out of prison. That should never happen between team guys. God bless, and happy New Year. So this text message is chock full of lies, which is not surprising. Dan sent this to Goggins after Dan himself was on a podcast talking trash on Goggins. And he is telling Goggins that he tried helping me get out of prison. Again, this man can't stop lying. He'll say whatever it takes to get people on his side and then do the opposite behind the scenes. This has been a repeating pattern of his since he's been in office. Now, I also have some documents here from my brother. It's a list in chronological order of each time he attempted to get Dan's support. He also has emails in here to Dan asking him for his support. I also have the petition that Dan wrote saying to keep me in prison. I'll have all of these on a link that you can click below and you can see for yourself. Again, the reason I'm telling you this is this is not about me. This is about you, the American people, no matter what side of the aisle you sit behind. Just because someone is a Navy SEAL or because they were wounded in combat does not make them a good person, does not mean they have character. I want you to think about that next time you vote. Look at this person's character. Look what he's saying, and then look what he's doing behind the scenes. If a person makes a decision and then has to put out a video the next day explaining why he made that decision, it's probably because he knows he didn't make the right decision. I don't wanna make this political. I just want people to know who they're voting for and who is representing them. So, Dan, if you wanna have a conversation, I'll be in DC next week actually doing real work to support our brothers and the teams and our law enforcement and our first responders. So if you want to have a conversation, you know where to find me, buddy.

@angelwoman501 — Patriot Lady

Posted - January 4, 2025 at 3:29 AM

Saved - January 4, 2025 at 7:16 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

This story keeps getting more intriguing. I discovered that the Las Vegas Cybertruck suspect, Matthew Livelsberger, participated in a military reality competition on the History Channel. He and his partner, Tim Kelly, won, and Kelly praised him as a great Green Beret.

@angelwoman501 - Patriot Lady

This story keeps going down deeper rabbit holes. Turns out the Las Vegas Cybertruck suspect and Green Beret Matthew Livelsberger took part in a military reality competition on the History Channel. His partner Tim Kelly and Matthew Livelsberger won the competition. Kelly said he was a great Green Beret.

@InsideEdition - Inside Edition

Las Vegas Cybertruck blast suspect Matthew Livelsberger took part in a military TV reality competition on the History Channel. https://t.co/StCIyv9JN2

Video Transcript AI Summary

The Ultimate Soldier Challenge featured elite soldiers competing globally. Matt Lippelsberger and Tim Kelly, both Green Berets, participated 12 years ago and dominated the competition. Lippelsberger, known as Matt Berg on the show, impressed Kelly, who recognized him from an older photo. Kelly described Lippelsberger as charming, talented, and kind—qualities expected of a Green Beret. During the competition, Lippelsberger struggled with heat exhaustion, expressing his distress. After a few years without contact, Kelly expressed confusion and heartbreak over Lippelsberger's situation, noting his value to his team and peers.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: It's a reality show that pits teams of elite soldiers from around the world against each other. Speaker 1: Matt and Tim from the US Army Special Forces, better known as the Green Berets. Speaker 0: Matthew Lippelsberger and his partner, Tim Kelly, both Green Beret appeared on the Ultimate Soldier Challenge 12 years ago on the History Channel. They not only won, it wasn't even close. Speaker 1: You know, for television, they always try to make it a little bit more competitive, but we swept the whole entire show. Speaker 0: When he appeared on the show, Livelsberger used a shortened version of his name, Matt Berg. So it took Tim Kelly a while to put 2 and 2 together. Speaker 1: And then I saw a Matt Berg with a older photo of him, and I was like, oh, no. Dude, I know that guy. And then it just, like, tore my heart out because he was a really great Green Beret. Speaker 0: And what was he like? Speaker 1: He was charming. He was talented. He was personable. He was kind. He was all the things that you would expect from a Green Beret. Speaker 0: At one point during the show, Livelsberger lost his cool in the 90 plus degree heat. Speaker 1: I'm about to blow it, man. I got heat exhaustion, man. I need to take this off right now. Speaker 0: Tim Kelly says he hadn't heard from Livelsberger for a few years. Speaker 1: It just, categorically, does not make sense. From everything that I have heard, he was universally, valued by his team, by his peers. I don't understand. It doesn't make sense, and it is just horrifically heartbreaking.