TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @annmforti
reSee.it AI Summary
The upcoming Supreme Court ruling for Murthy v. Missouri (Missouri v. Biden) is crucial due to its potential impact on free speech. It is being described as the worst violation in US history and will have implications for all of us.
@annmforti - Ann Forti
And this is why the upcoming Supreme Court ruling for Murthy v. Missouri (formally Missouri v. Biden) is so critical: “The worst free speech violation in United States history.“ The ruling will affect every single one of us. @NCLAlegal @MarkChangizi @DrJBhattacharya @AaronKheriatyMD @newlouisiana
Video Transcript AI Summary
The government's involvement in big tech censorship is a severe violation of civil liberties. The Biden administration's actions led to a decrease in social media impressions. Cases like Genghis v. HHS and Missouri v. Biden highlight government influence on tech companies to silence certain voices. Experts like Bhattacharya and Kulldorff faced censorship for their views on lockdowns. The government's constant direction to social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter to control information is concerning.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The government's involvement in big tech censorship is one of the worst civil liberties violations I think this country has ever seen.
Speaker 1: When the Biden administration started censoring, you can actually see the impressions fall all the way back down to levels that were even below where I had basically any following.
Speaker 2: This was an action of the administrative state rather than the private action of the social media companies.
Speaker 0: It's clear first amendment violation, and we have to stop it.
Speaker 1: If you start messing with the public square and ensuring or trying to decide what's true and you are undermining the very process, the only process that we have to find truth.
Speaker 0: Genghis versus HHS is about the government's involvement in big big tech censorship. While many people believed for a long time that this was, something that the tech companies were doing on their own, it turned out that the Biden voiced them on social media. What they were telling those third parties is we don't want people like voiced them on social media.
Speaker 2: What they were telling those third parties is we don't want people like your clients talking. Shut them up.
Speaker 0: Missouri versus Biden, is a case brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana along with NCLA. 2 of the plaintiffs are Jay Bhattacharya, an epidemiologist at Stanford, and Martin Kulldorff, who was an epidemiologist at Harvard. They wrote a short treatise in October of 2020 called the Great Barrington Declaration, where they issued lockdown, said that lockdowns were doing more harm than good.
Speaker 3: What's striking to me is that despite this diverse background, we've come to an agreement about what the science is telling us. This is a science based approach.
Speaker 0: There was a concerted effort to shut them down and that effort happened at the behest of the Biden administration.
Speaker 2: In between Shangeese and and Missouri v Biden, more information came out about what the government did. It's a constant stream of direction from the government to every single one of these, social media platforms.
Speaker 0: Facebook, Twitter, Google, LinkedIn, we're working with the government to decide who to silence, what kind of post to silence, what kind of information to silence.
reSee.it AI Summary
The CDC, FDA, and NIH have lost trust due to a video exposing deception and cover-ups. People from all political parties must acknowledge the cruelty inflicted on those who followed their instructions. Injured individuals express their shattered beliefs and loss of trust in the government. The extent of information control is shocking. We must question how our government health agencies allowed this to happen. Share this with medical professionals, lawmakers, and journalists.
@annmforti - Ann Forti
I do not know how anyone could trust the CDC, FDA, or NIH after watching this video. ALL people - of every political party and every ideology - need to realize the depth of deception and cover-up that has taken place, and the unconscionable cruelty that has been imposed upon those who did what they were asked to do. The voices of the injured who were discarded: "The injustice of everything is just so cruel, just absolutely cruel." ~Kristi Dobbs, Covid Vaccine injured "My whole belief system has been shattered. I learned that what I used to believe isn’t true, and I can no longer trust our government to do the right thing." ~Dr. Danice Hertz - 40 years as a gastroenterologist, Covid vaccine injured. "I would love for the government to take on the responsibility to fix what they broke." ~ Sheryl Ruettgars, Covid vaccine injured. "The world is not what I thought it was....The control and flow of information is far beyond anything I could have suspected it to be. I had no idea it is so bad." ~@BrianneDressen Covid vaccine injured. How is this happening in our government health agencies? There can be no room for trust when they have betrayed the good people of this country so deeply, Please share this with everyone you know, especially medical professionals, lawmakers and journalists.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers in the video express their disappointment and frustration with the lack of transparency and support from government agencies and the media regarding adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. They share their personal experiences of severe health issues after receiving the vaccine and their attempts to seek help and raise awareness. They believe that there is a deliberate cover-up of vaccine injuries and that the media is controlled to suppress their stories. They express their loss of trust in the government, media, and pharmaceutical companies, and their determination to continue advocating for the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the promise that, you know, repeatedly was made was that they would collect our data, and then they would disclose this information to the public. Right? So that's that's where we were at. We're like, okay, great, we're gonna participate, we're gonna go through the appropriate channels, and then they're gonna do their job on our behalf, and they're going to disclose this to the public. And we flooded all of the support groups with this hope.
But by the fall, we all realized that we had been duped, and that's when we started speaking publicly and started trying to call them out and hold them to account. The control and the flow of information is far beyond anything I could have suspected as far as corruption goes. So I reached out to the drug company, over the next several months, literally begging them, you know, for help tears running down my face, because I thought I was dying, and I got nowhere. After I landed in the hospital, my legs stopped working. The drug company called me while I was in the hospital and they said we're not, we're gonna tell you to not get the 2nd shot, the strange thing is, is that conveniently gave them the loophole to drop me from the trial, and in the clinical trial report in the New England Journal of Medicine, they say that they follow all adverse events for up to 7 30 days and the last I heard from them was day 60.
Speaker 1: I was One of the first to get the vaccine, I got it in the 2nd week of the rollout, and I had a near immediate reaction and within 30 minutes, I started having blurred vision. My face started burning. My tongue became numb. I felt very dizzy, and I almost passed out. And within about 24 hours, I became severely ill with neurological, cardiac, And autonomic, nervous system dysfunction.
I I was having severe agonizing burning pain in my face, my entire body. I felt like electricity was running through me. I had vibrations inside of me, loud tinnitus, and the list goes on and on, chest pain, shortness of breath, tachycardia, I started reaching out to physicians in my community who knew nothing about these reactions, and so I realized I had to go higher up and try to find someone who was involved with the vaccine to help me. And I came up with a gentleman's name at the seemed to help me, and I came up with a gentleman's name at the NIH, Alcus Togias, who's the branch division of, I guess, pulmonary diseases, lung diseases, and he was studying the vaccine, he acknowledged to me that they were well aware of these reactions, But they didn't know what to do for them. And he actually referred me to a woman at Stanford, Kari Nadeau, who was Studying adverse reactions to the vaccine.
And she was also very nice. And, I sent blood to her. She started studying my blood, she saw that I was having a serious reaction in my blood. She called it a type 3 hypersensitivity reaction. From there, you know, I tried to get help and virtually there was no help available to me.
Speaker 0: We thought that we were doing the right thing. We thought we were funneling everybody into a resource that was going to, in the end, help us and help the 1,000 more like us, but the sad reality is that wasn't the case, they weren't going to be disclosing my reaction or other reactions like mine to the American public. So we reached out to the NIH, to Avendra Nath and, it's the same department under Fauci. On January 10, 2021, that's when this study started at the NIH to evaluate adverse events to the COVID vaccines. Now the interesting thing about this is if you look back in time, there was a huge amount of the population that still had yet to get the vaccines but had no idea that the National Institutes of Health was launching a study to look into adverse events.
Speaker 2: My first contact with the NIH was through an email to doctor Zavavi, In, February, 2021.
Speaker 3: You know, I I was vaccinated January 18th 2021, I had an immediate reaction. I know with 100% certainty that my reaction and the cascade of health issues that I had are from the vaccine, there is no doubt about it. I was having nocturnal convulsions. I was having full autonomic, dysfunctions. You know, I know now being diagnosed with mast cell activation syndrome, small fiber neuropathy, histamine intolerance, dysautonomia, that My body was falling apart.
My mind frame at the very beginning was, I've gotta shout this from the rooftops. This can't happen to anybody else. I was sending messages out to Pfizer, I was sending messages to CDC, FDA, you know, big names with our governing agencies because, again, I'm not thinking that there's some sort of, you know, cover up going on with vaccine injuries. I'm thinking these people don't know about it and I need Tell them. I felt comfortable once, the ball was rolling with this NIH study to start enrolling individuals into, this Program that they were wanting us, to be involved in.
So that's how this whole, you know, group got started, how the whole with the NIH, our tagging with the CDC and the FDA, and the drug manufacturing companies, we all thought that we were doing what was right to actually get the word out instead of being hushed and covered up.
Speaker 1: I entered the study with Great hopes. I also connected with doctor Nath early on. He responded to me almost immediately and passed me on to his associate, doctor Saakovi. She acknowledged that they had many, many reports of similar injuries. In one email, she stated that they had over a 1000 reports of neurological injury, and this was, again, very early on in the rollout of the vaccine.
Seen. And she said they were very intent upon getting this information out and to be patient. They were planning To get it out within a matter of weeks. I abided by everything they asked me to do and and continued Talking to her regularly with virtual visits. And at one point, suddenly, there was no more communication, and her tone changed dramatically from being very friendly, very helpful, to almost angry.
And I asked myself, What happened, I couldn't understand it, but it turns out she changed her tone with everybody. So it felt like something happened. An ax fell on this research project. Someone from above said, stop it. We don't want You don't talk to these people anymore.
And I think everyone had that same reaction. And I even have an email To doctor Nath and doctor Sofovy in July of 2021 stating I was still horribly ill and begging for help. And Doctor Nass says, I'm sorry. I can't help you. Go back and see your local doctors.
And I explained to him that my local doctors had no clue what to do for me, and he just said, I'm sorry. I can't help you. And that was the end of my communication with them.
Speaker 3: When Safavie and I were having our visits, she knew that I had been on a Medril dose pack, which is a very small dose of steroid, but I was cut cut off before she even knew what the results of that taper were. When I very first had my 1st visit with her, the same thing as Denise, kind of assured me that they were doing this because they wanted to be transparent and they wanted to get the information out and that, you know, they wanted everything from me that they could get and I was willing to do it. I was begging and pleading with them in May, please bring me, please. I will do anything to get there. I will pay for my own ticket.
I will do anything for you to see me. And then here's the other ironic thing about what's going on here is, so Fabi was actually supposedly talking with my doctors. My neurologist all of a sudden, like, literally dropped me, like, canceled me as a patient, would not see me, would not let me schedule even an appointment to see the nurse practitioner in the office. So I was literally left helpless. I had no neurologist that was seeing me now that was supposedly talking with Safavie on treatments that needed to be done for myself.
And I was literally left in limbo, absolutely having to find new doctors again, no one to help me, and then the nice message from them that basically Said, I'm sorry. We can't help you find new doctors.
Speaker 2: On the study, I'm I'm, participant number 5. What's odd to me though is, you know, I sent all of my I had a skin biopsy done for small fiber neuropathy, and so My results from that were all sent to Savavi. My all my blood, my MRIs, brain scans, Every image that I had had taken from my brain or my body, she got everything. At the beginning of all of this, after my initial Zoom appointment with her, if you will, she offered to bring me out to the NIH and and then very quickly came off of that, but there was never any follow-up. So she had no way of knowing whether I had improved.
At the time of some of my last correspondence with her, my initial IVIG had been denied by my insurance, And I had asked her for help if she would be part of a if she would appeal be part of the appeal process to my insurance and she never really said yes or no. And that was my last communication with her was, November 2021,
Speaker 0: it was kind of interesting because after this whole thing went down, you know, I mean, we went from the spring, they're going to help us, right? That's where we're at. And we've flooded all of the support groups with this hope that the federal agencies had promised us, right, they promised us that they would disclose this multiple people, multiple formats, multiple agencies, and it's not just, you know, little minions either. I mean, like, Janet Woodcock is talking about this, you know, we've got, you know, Fauci's staffer, the head of the neuro infectious disease and talking about this and then over the summer all of us started getting these weird, cryptic, you know, conflicting messages and by the end of the summer, communication had ceased and Doctor. Sabawi was on a Facebook chat with several vaccine injured and she abruptly just left the chat, I had an appointment to fly back out to the NIH for follow-up evaluation, that was cancelled as well.
At about at the same time, that's when Denise got cut off and, and then by the fall it was crickets, and so we went from holding out and waiting and being held off, and they kept us, you know, they strategically on their end, it was very smart them, right, they made us promises to kind of keep a lid on the situation while they, increased vaccine uptake and they hit us, and they did it very well, and the sad thing is is that we didn't identify it earlier, and so we complied. But by the fall, we all realized that we had been duped, and that's when we started speaking publicly and started trying to call them out then hold them to account.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, we couldn't count on the NIH to help us. They were our only hope. The Community doctors really knew nothing about these reactions. There was no education coming from the FDA or the drug companies about, adverse effects, all that was ever told to everybody was that there are no adverse effects. They are completely safe vaccines.
So we were left with nothing, really. I myself sought out consultations with 25 different doctors, 8 neurologists, all of whom told me that they had no idea what was wrong with me or what to do for me. So that's where we were left with basically bending for ourselves.
Speaker 0: It'd be easy for the propaganda machine at this point to put every single one of these honest, real people that are suffering from real diseases in the bucket of misinformation or anti vaxx, those 2 terms, all anyone needs to hear from anyone is, oh, that's that's misinformation or information or, Oh, that's anti vaxx, and then what that does is it kind of puts a block there for people to explore further and to actually take an honest and open look at this.
Speaker 1: My impression was that they really didn't want to hear from us.
Speaker 0: So Doctor. Hertz had been pushing back and forth, and I think Christy was too, pushing back and forth directly with Janet Woodcock, head of the FDA, from the late spring clear through the summer, we all were getting similar responses, but still it was something that the public was not being told. So, so we had our 1st meeting with Peter Marks and his staff, August 23, 2021 and right after that is when the NIH abruptly stopped talking with us like officially, just nothing. But it was interesting because that exact same day was the day that Commernati was approved And Peter Marks decided that he didn't need to show up to our meeting. So instead of showing up to listen to the voices of those who their lives have been permanently altered and, and now essentially are existing as if they are half dead, which that's what it feels like every single day for every one of us, we don't feel like we're alive.
It feels like we're, you know, just trying to stay out of our graves, and it's ridiculous, and nobody should have to live like this, let alone alone, you know. So Peter Marks ditched that meeting.
Speaker 1: As Brie said, Peter Marks didn't show up to the meeting. He sent his Director of communications to the meeting, we made it clear to her that we weren't here for individual help. We were here for collective help, that there were many, many, many of us out there suffering horribly, and we needed help, and She didn't respond. She just said thank you very much, and that was the end of the meeting. So it seemed like they were just, you know, Obligated to listen to us, but really had no interest in hearing what we had to say and no plan on acting On any of the information that we were giving them.
And it was clear to me. I had many emails back and forth with Janet Woodcock, Who was at the time the the head of the FDA, and it was clear to me that she wasn't going to be doing anything about it. At one point, I asked her in an email, who is looking into these reactions? Give me their names. Where are they?
Why have none of them contacted us, why don't they want samples from us, what research is being done, and she didn't answer me.
Speaker 0: But at the end of the day, we're this far into the pandemic. And because of the mandates, I think the fact that we are the living and walking evidence that there's a problem with the vaccine program, they can't go back on that. This whole rabbit hole and this hole that they have dug is far due too deep now for them to be able to go back and say, guess what guys, we were wrong. We all started with NPR, letters to NPR, emails to NPR, CNN, CBS, ABC, you know, we started with the mainstream, so there is a definite reason why you're not seeing it on the mainstream, and one of the most frustrating things I still here to this day is, you guys are all a bunch of right wing nutters, blah blah blah blah blah, and it's like, this is all by design. Right, it's all by design.
The media coverage and where we're allowed to be seen and who we're allowed to be seen with, it's all by design. Any one of us would gladly be sitting next to a reporter on CNN, even if they were going to sit there and just say, How do you know it's the vaccine? We would do it in a heartbeat, right? This was not our choice. Who we are seeing, who are who we are being seen with publicly, that's not our choice.
We have evidence on the back end of different reporters emailing us and texting us and telling us they can't report on it for several reasons, but it usually has to do with their sponsors the other reason is they're afraid of being sued by the drug companies it leaked out that the federal agencies we're issuing contracts with all of the mainstream media, $1,300,000,000 in taxpayer money, to essentially silence the adverse events of the COVID vaccines and so the only thing that you saw from the mainstream media after those contracts were issued was only the good.
Speaker 1: Our meeting with a news reporter who interviewed Quite a few of us on a Zoom meeting, she cried when she heard our stories. She promised us that her news story would be Published within a couple of days, and then she started asking us for more information saying this is a bigger story than I realized. I wanna interview some of the key people that you're telling me about. So it dragged on and it dragged on, and then all of a sudden, We no longer heard from her and that was the end of it. And and that was typical of a lot of interactions we had with mainstream media.
Some people were interested in us, but clearly they were not allowed to to publish anything about us. So clearly, there's been a Complete control of the media. Where that comes from, I mean, my own opinion, it comes from our federal agencies, just like I believe they cut us from the NIH, they're controlling the media, and it it's infuriating to me.
Speaker 3: To be transparent in that, A Zoom call that we had with her, I don't want to give too much information, but there was, at the end of that phone call or that Zoom Call it was discussed that, you know, Pfizer was basically threatening their, station and certain individuals at that station because they had aired some other, news stories about, some reactions to vaccines.
Speaker 2: There are so many of us That are suffering in silence. Nobody followed up with us. You had you had these women that were sitting that toward told these very compelling heartbreaking Stories on the topic that was very hot and no one would touch it. Now the n h the NIH has done a study. I mean, it's right there.
Even though we would call it junk science, I would call it actually fraud, because the results are, you know, we all healed and we all walked into the sunset with our health return, which is not accurate, no one will report on this, it's incredibly discouraging.
Speaker 0: The public is being reassured that we are being taken care of and that if anything were to happen to them, they would be taken care of, too. But in reality, the absolute opposite is happening. You will be cast aside. You will be villainized. You will be abused.
You will be neglected, and the people that are in authority will outright lie about you and your life.
Speaker 1: Like I said before, my whole belief system has been shattered, and so I learned that what I used to believe in isn't true And that I no longer can trust our government to do the right thing, and I also learned that there is not Freedom of speech in this country. I've submitted many letters to, the New York Times, the LA Times, other large periodicals to get zero response, obviously, there's been a complete control of the media.
Speaker 0: I've learned that the world is not what I thought it was. The world is far more complicated and, not nearly as free as I thought it was, the control and the flow of information is far beyond anything I could have suspected as far as corruption goes. I had no idea it was as bad as it is. And to be honest, if I had I not had a front row seat, I wouldn't have believed any of it.
Speaker 3: Going through the whole issue of the NIH and them wanting to, you know, scientifically research us and and follow the science. Science is not being followed here. It is absolutely being crushed and only push through in one direction and that's the direction that they see fit. It's changed my mind of a lot of things in this world. The media is corrupt.
Our government is corrupt. Big pharma is corrupt. And just to see all the corruption, I'm sad. I'm sad for our world. I'm sad for Americans.
I'm I'm sad for individuals. It just, the injustice of everything is just Cruel. Just absolutely cruel.
Speaker 2: Well, I could echo of what both Denise and Christi, you know, have stated. I think for each of us, we've had to come to terms with, a lot of unknowns, you know, for our future And not knowing what the next day brings. You know, I see people that are in very destitute situations with their health, with their finances, Who are, trying to just be present in the day that they've been given and making the most of what they have
Speaker 0: For sick nobodies, we're doing everything we can, and we will continue to do everything we can for the sake of humanity and because we want to make sure that history is not going to repeat itself.