reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @arden_young_
reSee.it AI Summary
CIA officer/former FBI claims ability to manipulate situations to incriminate anyone. FBI targeted Alex Jones, seizing his funds and attempting to silence him. Around 20 undercover FBI agents were involved in the January 6th incident, some now working for the CIA. FBI uses exaggerated news and fake social media to provoke anger.
@arden_young_ - Arden Young
BREAKING: CIA Officer/Former FBI Boasts “Can Put Anyone in Jail…Set ’Em Up!” “We Call It a Nudge”https://t.co/Dzndk0XQt0 FBI “Did What We Wanted” with Alex Jones @RealAlexJones “Took His Money Away” “Chop His Legs Off” Estimates 20 Undercover FBI Agents at J6, Works with Some of Them Now at CIA FBI Uses “Embellished” News, “Fake Social Media” to “Really Get People Mad”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how the bureau practices near-entrapment to target individuals like Alex Jones, aiming to bankrupt them through civil lawsuits. They mention using fake social media posts to provoke reactions and reveal that FBI agents were undercover at the January 6th Capitol riot. The speaker states that about 20 agents were present but not involved in violence, highlighting the bureau's discreet presence at such events. They emphasize the need for a larger law enforcement presence in such situations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can kinda
Speaker 1: put anyone in jail if you know what to do.
Speaker 2: How? I'm sorry about that.
Speaker 0: Does the bureau practice entrapment a lot?
Speaker 3: Yeah. We get really close. We call it a nudge.
Speaker 4: A nudge. A nudge.
Speaker 0: Sometimes you just gotta get a quick look
Speaker 3: just to see what happens. Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to follow.
Speaker 2: That's something we're putting on a fake
Speaker 3: social media thing to, like, really get people mad.
Speaker 0: Balance
Speaker 3: Jones. Yeah. So we were after him. You are? We did what we wanted.
Speaker 5: Which was what?
Speaker 3: We took his money away. He shot his legs.
Speaker 6: Gavin Oglenis is a contracting officer at the CIA. Oglenis worked for the FBI in 2021 and 2020 2 in the San Diego office, moved on to Homeland Security where he conducted asylum interviews at the southern border, and now works for the CIA managing multimillion dollar contracts across government agencies and private sector vendors.
Speaker 3: I work for, I work for this without I'm not supposed to tell people any job.
Speaker 0: I say intelligence, what do you think? CIA? Amazing.
Speaker 3: So I deal a lot with, like, different agencies. We're contracting with, like, director of National Intelligence to do stuff. We do Navy, Army, video, really. I just FBI. I used to work for the FBI.
So Yeah. Through the FBI app. They're like, here, you used to work there. Oh, I'm permanent. I'm still Yeah.
Speaker 0: Good. Well, why do they call contractors?
Speaker 3: Because I do the contracts. Uh-huh. I do all the legal contracts. With the bureau. I was the guy in the back of the truck in the van.
Speaker 6: O'Blennis spoke to an undercover signed investigations reporter about his work experience involving near entrapment and his employers' involvement with political commentator Alex Jones' legal battles.
Speaker 0: As long as the bureau is able to progress far enough to be able to put pro lifers in jail whenever they want. Yeah. You think that's on the agenda?
Speaker 2: We can we can
Speaker 3: you can kinda put anyone
Speaker 1: in jail if you know what to do. How?
Speaker 2: You set them
Speaker 3: up. You create the situation to where they have no choice but to act on their impulse. And once they act on that impulse, then we call that entrapment. It's a fine line.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Does the bureau practice entrapment a lot? Yeah. We get really close. Not officially?
Speaker 3: No. We get as close as we can. We get as close as we can to it without doing it.
Speaker 0: So they can entrap some of these pro lifers into doing things that they don't can do.
Speaker 3: Yeah. We call it a nudge.
Speaker 4: A nudge. A nudge.
Speaker 0: Sometimes you
Speaker 3: just gotta get a quick look just to see what happens. Right?
Speaker 0: And how does that happen?
Speaker 2: You put
Speaker 0: a post out there or
Speaker 3: you have some fake profile say something that triggers that we know is gonna trigger that. Like, we we already know your history. If we're to that point, we already know everything about So, like, oh, this is this one. Oh. Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to fall.
Right?
Speaker 0: Like a railing. Like a oh. So when a railing happens, then sometimes the the bureau behind it. Yeah. Sometimes.
Speaker 2: Nothing like putting out a
Speaker 3: fake social media thing to, like, really get people mad. Mhmm. Post fake news. Yeah. Sometimes it's it's not fake.
It's embellished a little bit. Who would
Speaker 0: be, like, a big influencer that you're influencer that you're after? You're like, I don't know, like, I don't even know these names. Like, a Fox News person or like a Tucker Carlson or like oh, I'm sure he's Right.
Speaker 3: You always want the biggest and loudest. Like that what
Speaker 0: was his name? The one
Speaker 3: that said, Sandy Hook didn't happen.
Speaker 0: Alex Jones?
Speaker 3: Yeah. So we were after him.
Speaker 0: You are? Before.
Speaker 2: Are you still after
Speaker 0: him? Yeah. Why?
Speaker 3: Because he's broke. He got found guilty and had to pay, like, a $100,000,000.
Speaker 0: So what what are the after?
Speaker 3: We're not anymore.
Speaker 0: Just to get the money from him?
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Was that court case used? Was that a CFO
Speaker 3: case?
Speaker 0: That was the agency there?
Speaker 3: Well, actually, it was a defamation case. So it's a civil document. Well, we were looking at all of his callers, commenting, oh, I'm like, who's that gonna be this? Right? So even though it's technically not our well, not an agency, definitely, but not the bureau, for instance, yeah, it was not our purview.
It's a civil civil matter. Since they got all this access to his stuff and it's there, What can we go find?
Speaker 1: And did you find
Speaker 3: it? I can't tell you.
Speaker 0: Oh, we did.
Speaker 3: But so, you know, it's it's just kinda, like, you know, realize the opportunity that you have.
Speaker 0: So with Alex Jones, you were watching him long before anything ended up happening? I thought it
Speaker 3: was it wasn't my office, but, I mean, we would've we would've been well aware of what he was doing. And the
Speaker 0: goal with him was what?
Speaker 3: Just to bankrupt him? Pretty much. And we let the families do it. Oh my god. And what?
We let the families do it. Were they encouraged to do that by the bureau, like a nudge? We don't encourage people, but, like, we we just say there's no federal statute being broken. But you do have the option for a civil or a civil case. It's a pretty good case.
Nice. In our opinion.
Speaker 0: So oh, that makes so much sense. I have a cousin who's a lawyer. So that's a lot of these cases. They're they're kind of encouraged by the FBI.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Like, there's something federally federal law we can do. Let's simply, we'll add them that way. I I chopped this place, and they did. So the FBI was happy.
We didn't care. We were not
Speaker 0: home. Basically, the citizens did your job? Yeah. Wow. So you can encourage a civil lawsuit?
Speaker 3: Very encouraged. Educated. What can you do with
Speaker 0: people like Alex Jones now? Is he still out there? Good. He's still chirping.
Speaker 3: He can chirp? You still watching? Yeah. Why? I said He did what we wanted.
Speaker 5: Which was what?
Speaker 3: We took his money away. We shut him out for a while. You're never gonna shut him up for him.
Speaker 0: How well, unless you put him in prison.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I was going to
Speaker 3: Again, he didn't Being ignorant is not a crime, though. It's just It is. I mean, what
Speaker 0: you could bring a nun
Speaker 3: if he did inside a riot like Cheeto.
Speaker 1: He didn't furnish people to go
Speaker 3: shoot me. He didn't.
Speaker 6: Additionally, O'Blennis states that he knows and works with FBI agents who were undercover in the January 6th Capitol riot, estimating about 20 field agents were there undercover. While O'Blennis notes that they were not involved in violence, this appears to be the first submission of undercover FBI agents in attendance.
Speaker 0: I thought you said that there were FBI agents in the crowd at j 6.
Speaker 3: There are. There always are when there's a big protest in DC just in case it gets out of here.
Speaker 0: They but there
Speaker 3: wasn't wasn't enough to turn that tight. I mean, I'm talking to maybe have a 20. You needed a 1,000 to get rid of that that crap.
Speaker 0: So they had, like oh, that was on just 20?
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Just to go through and see what I can hear, you know, that kind of thing. Wow.
Speaker 0: That's yeah. Definitely. They need a 1,000 lease. Wow. That's also
Speaker 3: Capitol Police are sickly. They're in charge. So does that They didn't have more on hand? I don't know.
Speaker 0: The bureau didn't really want people knowing that they were in the crowd. Mhmm.
Speaker 3: Because that would be overstepping their bounds.
Speaker 2: A little
Speaker 0: bit. Do people know that? Why? Do people know that the bureau was in the crowd?
Speaker 3: Nope. You probably never will.
Speaker 0: Do you know agents that were there?
Speaker 3: Mhmm. Really?
Speaker 0: They work
Speaker 3: for the agency now.
@arden_young_ - Arden Young
NEW UNDERCOVER VID P*rnhub Parent Aylo Employee: Kids “Will Find Their Kink” on Aylo P*rn Site Aylo Writer: 12-Year-Olds Watching TransAngels P*rn “Probably Helps a Lot” “Need to Push Stuff That’s Less Accepted… Get More Men, Straight Men, in on [Gay & Trans P*rn], Too” https://t.co/waHorfbWlE
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the ease of underage individuals accessing porn sites and the potential benefits of exposing them to different sexual orientations and gender identities. They mention that age verification measures are not very strict and that educational aspects of the content could be helpful for young people exploring their sexuality. The speakers also talk about pushing boundaries and introducing less accepted content, such as featuring trans individuals in mainstream sites, to attract a wider audience. They emphasize the importance of experimentation and exploring different niches. Overall, they reveal insights into the strategies and goals of MindGeek, the parent company of popular porn sites like Pornhub.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To get on, what do you have to do?
Speaker 1: Not much. Probably not much. Yeah.
Speaker 0: How easy is it for, like, an underage person to view the site?
Speaker 2: Go into the site.
Speaker 3: Let's say you're 12 years old. You're still figuring out your sexuality, maybe even your gender. Wouldn't it be helpful to see, Not a celebration, but just, like, maybe a normalization of something that you think is what you want. You know? Probably helps a Let's say I was 12 and I saw, like, Trans Angels, I saw all these different sites.
It would help me figure out what I do like and what I don't like. We need to try to push stuff that's more less less accepted. Like, putting a putting a a trans Male or trans female in a scene, you wouldn't get that on a normal mainstream site, so test it out. See if you get a bigger audience with it. See if you can convert somebody.
Right? Like, maybe somebody who's never looked for anything like that might find it interesting and click on it. Same thing for bicep, same thing for gay.
Speaker 4: If you've seen our previous undercover releases, you may be familiar with Mike Farley, the current Pornhub product manager who became one of Pornhub's first employees over 10 years ago, And Dylan Rice, the senior scriptwriter for Pornhub's parent company, MindGeek, now rebranding as Alo, who has written scripts for MindGeek's porn sites and advertisements For over 5 years. Today, meet Syl Fernandez. Fernandez is a production coordinator for some of MindGeek's plethora of porn sites. Under laws to require IDs to prevent children from entering porn sites, these 3 men talked to our undercover reporter about children viewing pornography on mindgeek sites, age. Including Pornhub and TransAngels and Men .com, which are mind gate sites featuring studio produced transgender and gay focused a Pornography.
Speaker 0: How we see it is it for, like, an underage person to view the site?
Speaker 2: Go to the site.
Speaker 0: To get on? What do you have to do?
Speaker 1: At most. Probably that much. Yeah.
Speaker 0: There was a sudden effect was, kids right
Speaker 1: now? I mean, sounds like my interest. It's awesome. Really? Yeah.
I mean, it makes sense. And they're
Speaker 3: all Yeah.
Speaker 1: Definitely associated with humor.
Speaker 0: A break. Like, it's a 90%
Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly. That's the thing is that the love is good. I can tell you it's not.
Speaker 3: And that's wrong. Do you think
Speaker 0: that kids go to bed night.
Speaker 1: Do I think they go on there?
Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: So I think it's still going there for sure.
Speaker 0: All you have to do It was, like, what, probably check the box or something to
Speaker 1: I think so. Yeah. I probably just asked you, are you 18 years old? Yes or no? Yeah.
Yeah. I don't think they've done, like, too much underex? It's got some educational aspects to it, so
Speaker 0: Yeah. There's so many, I
Speaker 5: mean, especially with boys.
Speaker 4: Rice and Fernandez had more to say about their work, specifically in LGBTQ content.
Speaker 0: Here you go. It sounds like lonely press 12 year olds are going on Trans Angels in a movie.
Speaker 3: Yeah. I think so. I I mean, like, think about it. Let's say you're 12 years old. You're still figuring out your state quality, maybe even your gender.
Wouldn't it be to see not a celebration, but just, like, maybe a normalization of something that you think is what you want, you know, Probably helps a lot. He's here.
Speaker 0: I think it, shaped sexual attitude. Like, you make you find out you're not. That's been what you prefer.
Speaker 3: Yes. Oh, that's an amazing point. It's like if let's say I was 12, and I saw, like, Trans Angels. I saw all these different sites. It would help me figure out what I do like and what I don't like because If you're exposed to nothing, you have no idea.
And maybe you're more, like, pliable.
Speaker 0: Help me. Thank you. Because that's, like,
Speaker 3: what you're doing. Thank you very much, guys. A
Speaker 1: it? Shouldn't just get a sexual peek at that point.
Speaker 0: Some LGV to your kids who Sure. Are so confused.
Speaker 3: Of course. Of course.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's true.
Speaker 3: No. Of course. Of course. Yeah. I missed
Speaker 1: the retro. It's still that way.
Speaker 0: Do you think
Speaker 1: I'm I'm sure. Yeah. I mean, they'll they'll fight a new kink in there, I'm sure. The thing is It's
Speaker 3: like when you write for, like, Sean Cody, which is, like, primarily gay targeted, when you write for transadals, it's trans, female presenting targeted. You You also try to see how much you can take of that and bring it to mainstream vanilla content. Right? Because like Raz years and Reality Kings is Predominantly for straight men, but you try to, like, push the envelope as much as you can. Be like, Okay.
Can I hint it, like, buy content here? Can I can I, like, talk more about, like, what if we brought a trans talent onto the site And you kind of like take those risks to try and broaden it a little bit more even though you know that you have a site dedicated to that? Right? You're always trying to push a little
Speaker 4: Rice explains how MindGeek sites gradually introduce and push what he describes as less accepted content.
Speaker 3: Rather's thinking they're approaching that. They're the biggest. They're everywhere. So they need to appeal to every single niche, and I think they've they've done a lot to explore Kind of every mainstream thing. So what they need to do now is they need to try to push stuff that's more less less accepted.
Like, Putting a putting a a trans male or trans female in a scene, you wouldn't get that on a normal mainstream site. So test it out. See if you get Clear audience with it. See if you can convert somebody. Right?
Like, maybe somebody who's never looked for anything like that might find it interesting. You can click on it. Same thing for buy stuff, same thing for gay, But my stuff is usually marketed towards women, but they also wanna try and get more men straight men, you know, on it too, Or bike tourism then. Because the thing is the thing about trans angels into the site, it's female presenting age? Trans women.
It's and, like, they sell that to straight men. Like, that's the demographic. So I think The next big step would be trying to do something that's kinda counterculture. Maybe doing, like, you could be a trans man in a scene, Like, having a guide, male presenting, TransMed with the and see how that does.
Speaker 1: We'll see
Speaker 3: how people react to it differently. Like, it's a lot of experimenting and seeing what hits and what doesn't.
Speaker 0: Under Wow. Exposing all the secrets.
Speaker 3: That's it. All the secrets.
@arden_young_ - Arden Young
NEW UNDERCOVER TAPE: Aylo (P*rnhub's owner) hires psychologists to “make banks happy” “It’s all performative because they’ll [Visa and MC] eventually come back every single time…they just want plausible deniability” “You can manipulate data…interpret it any way you want” https://t.co/EAFWhf6kP8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Visa and Mastercard's decision to stop processing payments on Pornhub following controversies is discussed. The speakers question the power of these companies to determine what is deemed acceptable in society. They suggest that Visa and Mastercard's actions are performative and driven by a desire for plausible deniability. The speakers mention a lawsuit alleging that Visa conspired with Pornhub to profit from sex crimes. They also discuss the role of psychologists hired by Alo, the parent company of Pornhub, to provide cover for Visa and Mastercard. The speakers express skepticism about the trustworthiness of the data provided by these psychologists. They note that Visa and Mastercard's decisions are primarily driven by their desire to make money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's legitimately, like Yeah. On there.
Speaker 1: Yep. Like,
Speaker 0: could Visa and Mastercard care?
Speaker 1: I think they it's crazy how essentially Visa and Mastercard can decide whether society deems acceptable or not. Right? Like, just a bunch of dudes in a boardroom deciding. But, like, it's all performative because they'll eventually come back every single because they wanna make that fucking money. They don't wanna get involved at the end of the day.
They just want plausible deniability. They want the mask. Right? If if they could get away with it, they would, I think.
Speaker 2: Following controversies, Visa and Mastercard stopped processing payments on pornhub. Visa and Mastercard have a prerogative to make money and be successful businesses, but a major lawsuit alleges Visa conspired with Pornhub to profit from sex crimes. Pornhub is owned by porn giant, Alo, formerly known as Mindbeat. Visa and Mastercard still process payments on the vast majority of Alo sites. Dylan Rice, a senior scriptwriter at Alo, told our undercover journalist about how Alo hires performative psychologists to give Visa and Mastercard cover If anything goes wrong.
Speaker 0: Why does Visa and Mastercard require the psychologist? Like, what safety is that?
Speaker 1: You know, I think they're just worried about blames. Like, if something goes wrong with Pornhub or Brazzers or Reality Kings or any of these sites, they don't want someone to go like, Visa and Mastercard, why are you letting them do this? Right? Because Visa and Mastercard don't let you buy drugs and sell drugs. Why would they not let Why would they let you do porn?
So I think they're just worried about that. But at the end of the day, they'll always come back because they wanna make money.
Speaker 0: The psychologists for what they want.
Speaker 1: Yeah. They did they just want reassurance that if things were to go like, if they were in, like, a news story. They could point to something to give me, like, well, we have research or we have data that shows that these things are positive because, you know, like we said earlier, it's complex. So you're not gonna ever have, like, black or white. It's always gray.
Speaker 0: Do you trust the data from the psychologist?
Speaker 1: No. I don't. Because I feel like as a researcher when I was in school, you can manipulate data. Like, you can interpret it way you want. Like, I could look at something and argue because that's really what they teach you in school.
They don't teach you any facts. They teach you how to argue everything. So if I wanted to make 1 argument, I could make it. And so if I saw data, I could argue anything. And, like, I I guarantee you there are people that do it for whatever reason they want.
Speaker 0: MyGeek.
Speaker 1: At MyGeek and Visa. Yeah. Like, imagine like, let's say we had data. Right? And we we were, like, looking at the ages of everyone looking at Pornhub, and we had a lot of people that, where we had a lot need to save 12 year olds for reviewing it.
Right? I could argue that either that's normal because there's more kids on the Internet these days, so there's always gonna increase. I could say it's abnormal because we didn't used to have that 10 years ago. Like, you get argued with both sides, and I feel like, Dana, you could make Anything. You could probably argue for a lot of stuff.
Speaker 0: And, like what? So why is it Well,
Speaker 1: they got mad recently because of the The controversy. Remember you're saying the girl that got her, I think we talked about it. I can't remember it. Where she was like, oh, I want to get for me because when it was filmed, I was on the page, whatever. So that made them very and, basically, they don't want drama.
If there's any drama, they'll be like, no. I'm good. But other than that, They wanna make money, so we'll do whatever. Any big allegations happen, it's usually oh, you see that lightning. It's usually, Mastercard and Visa gets mad.
They stop working with us for a little bit. A couple of months later, they come back.
Speaker 0: What makes them come back?
Speaker 1: They want I guess they wanna make money still. Yeah.
Speaker 0: The psychologist.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm
Speaker 0: still really, like, interested in that. So they tell you Kind of like how do they decide what's ethical and what's not?
Speaker 1: So I think they lucked into their job, and they they Like, so the reason why we need to have the ethics and stuff is not because, like, we're trying to to prove society. It's literally so that Visa and Mastercard because Visa and Mastercard decide everything. If Visa or Mastercard are mad at us, all our payments can't go through with the bank's homework with us, whatever. So 90% of our stuff is to make them happy, essentially. And, like, we've had 2 times in the past where They have been upset, so they stopped processing our stuff for, like, months.
And then it's just like you you can pay crypto, you can pay, prepaid cards, with it. That's it. So that psychologist is mostly there to make banks happy. Hey,
Speaker 0: Lisa. Visa. Mastercard.
Speaker 1: I think it's just they're covering their butt, really. They I don't think they care. Like, they don't wanna change society. They just wanna make money.
Speaker 0: Is there anything else that in order to, I guess, make Visa and Mastercard happy have to do?
Speaker 1: No. I think it's basically just have, like, some sort of system where we look like and probably act like we are putting