reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @awakenindiamvmt

@awakenindiamvmt — Awaken India Movement

Posted - October 25, 2023 at 5:02 PM

Saved - May 9, 2026 at 12:19 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I summarize a set of posts alleging serious issues with India’s polio campaign: alleged informed-consent violations, coercion to vaccinate, diagnostic redefinition to hide cases, focus on eradicating wild polio rather than AFP, high vaccine-doses with reported adverse events, VAPP/GBS links, rising AFP despite campaigns, IMA concerns, legal compensations, and claims that eradication mischaracterized outcomes. They connect OPV to harms and argue for IPV debate, plus broader links to pesticides and media reports.

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

The truth about India's "Polio Eradication Story" 1. Violation of Informed Consent: Side effects like polio due to vaccination were deliberately hidden with full knowledge of everyone involved in running the campaign including global bodies like @WHO and @UNICEFIndia . 2. Coercion to vaccinate: There were reports of power supply cuts and ration withdrawal for families that refused to vaccinate. 3. Change in diagnostic criteria that led to a drastic reduction in numbers despite high AFP incidence: Until 1996, all AFP cases used to be classified as polio. WHO defined criteria resulted in a drastic reduction in polio cases, with vast majority of AFP cases since 1997 classified as 'non-polio'. 4. Polio eradication was a controversial virological exercise: Polio eradication was not about eradication of acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), just eradication of wild polio viruses from stools which had little impact on AFP incidence. 5. 67% of polio cases were actually triggered by intramuscular injections: i.e. medical intervention was the cause of two thirds of polio cases. 6. Indiscriminate dosage with little regard for safety: From 3 doses to 7 doses to about 70 million children receiving 10 doses a year. Several children received an unheard 25 doses . 7. Disproportionately high number of polio cases were actually vaccinated: In 2007 to 2009, when coverage of 3 doses or more was 67%-73%, an astonishing 96% of the reported polio cases had received 4 or more doses of the vaccine. 8. The vaccination campaign was associated with rising Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) cases: An additional 491,000 children suffered AFP possibly as a consequence of the mass polio campaign per research by Dr. Pulliyel et. al. 9. Indian Medical Association (IMA) had raised concerns about side effects but government was in denial mode: A 2006 story in Times Of India reported that IMA was concerned that a decade long exercise for polio eradication had not reduced incidence of AFP. 10. Loss of eyesight following vaccination: Per a regional media report, a child who lost eyesight allegedly after receiving polio vaccination (Jalpaiguri in Bengal, February 2020). How many such cases occurred is impossible to say given inadequate AEFI system. 11. Brain stroke following vaccination: Per another regional media report from Dibrugarh, Assam, June, 2019, a father was looking to sell his kidney to gather funds for treating his son who suffered a brain stroke following polio vaccination. 12. Death following vaccination: In 2009, a city court acknowledged death following polio vaccination, ordered the Delhi government to pay compensation of Rs. 2 lakh. 13. Court acknowledged polio vaccine as the cause of paralysis and ordered regional government to pay compensation: In 1996 a child became paralyzed following polio vaccine. After 25 year legal battle which included intervention by Supreme court, court has ordered health department to compensate victim with Rs 42 lakhs. 14. Polio from vaccine: Polio from vaccinations continue to occur. These are called VAPP (vaccine associated paralytic poliomyelitis) and classified as non-polio. An estimated 3% of AFP cases are VAPP per one study. 15. GBS (Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) from the oral polio vaccine: GBS (Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a documented side effect of the Oral Polio vaccine and accounts for close to half of the AFP (acute flaccid paralysis) cases. #WorldPolioDay #ThePolioFiles #IndiaFightsPolio #UncomfortableFacts @drkohilathas @P_McCulloughMD @naomirwolf @ChildrensHD @RobertKennedyJr @stopvaccinating @uTobian @forrestmaready @BusyDrT @mercola @dockaurG @mansukhmandviya @MoHFW_INDIA @narendramodi @myogiadityanath @OpenVAERS @JoshWalkos @MinorityView @sayerjigmi @HealthRanger Sources in thread below.

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

On the "occasion" of World Polio Day, here are 15 facts that unmask the truth of the polio vaccination campaign in India 🧵 #WorldPolioDay #ThePolioFiles #IndiaFightsPolio #UncomfortableFacts

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

https://t.co/g8UKok8zkl

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

Did you know? In the 1930s, 2 separate polio vaccines were made available in US, one by Dr. Maurice Brodie (killed virus) and the other by Dr. John Kolmer (attenuated). Both vaccines were discontinued following reports of 12 cases of paralysis following vaccination, including 6 deaths. In the modern context, once can argue that we have documented side effects orders of magnitude higher than the above, but still polio vaccines continue to be mass administered. #WorldPolioDay #ThePolioFiles https://archive.org/details/lesserharmsmoral0000halp/page/n9/mode/2up https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.116854/page/n1075/mode/2up?view=theater https://archive.org/details/sim_american-journal-of-public-health_1936-02_26_2/page/116/ https://archive.org/details/sim_science-news-us_1935-01-05_27_716/page/6/mode/2up?q=kolmer+brodie+polio+vaccine

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

Given issues with OPV (Oral Polio Vaccine), should India used IPV (injectable polio vaccine) instead? Answer: No There was enough information available in the late 1950s, early 60s itself to suggest that IPV (also called Salk vaccine) was ineffective or had low effectiveness, did not prevent transmission, and could potentially cause paralysis #WorldPolioDay https://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e2398/rr/578260 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2555377/pdf/bullwho00330-0012.pdf https://everlyreport.com/the-truth-about-the-polio-vaccines-chicago-tribune-archives/ https://archive.org/details/sim_jama_1957-11-09_165_10/page/1336/mode/2up?view=theater

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

https://t.co/0TjR75322P

@awakenindiamov - awakenindiamovement

Follow this thread to know more about the truth of the #polio #vaccines

@AnhoneeRahasya - अनहोनी रहस्य

अगर किसी अभियान की असफलता की निशानी को चुपचाप दफ़ना दिया गया है तो वह अभियान सफल ही नज़र आएगा। https://youtu.be/soaEm11jxbA

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

Based on the below studies, about 3.3% to 3.7% of the annual reported AFP (acute flaccide paralysis) cases are VAPP (vaccine associated paralytic poliomyeltis). This implies that over the period 2000 - 2022, somewhere between 27,000-33,000 children below the age of 15 suffered from vaccine induced polio or VAPP. So while polio is considered eradicated, we estimate that 10s of thousands of children actually suffered vaccine induced polio which India obediently classifies as non-polio https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.03.063 https://mansapublishers.com/index.php/ijch/article/view/550/481 AFP data source: https://extranet.who.int/polis/public/CaseCount.aspx

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

"No efforts have been made to find the causes for high incidence of vaccine failure and VAPP (vaccine associated paralytic poliomyelitis)." - Dr. Yash Paul (former member, Polio Eradication Committee, Indian Academy of Pediatrics) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15532129/

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

India: The illusion of polio eradication. One chart says it all. #WorldPolioDay #WHOQuitIndia

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

Consumption of the pesticide DDT declined by ~68% from 1980 to 1995. Coincidentally, polio incidence declined by ~80%. Subsequently, mass vaccination campaigns, also called PPI (pulse polio immunizations) were launched, and over the next decade some children received an unheard 25 doses leading to a massive spike in cases of acute flaccid paralysis (which pre-1997 would've been classified as polio). DDT data sources: https://ipen.org/sites/default/files/documents/POPs%20Country%20Situation%20report.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499664/ https://t.co/OMoUdG7eiX

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

2.5 billion US dollars was spent by Government of India from 1994-2012 for polio eradication. Was this money well spent, or an organized l👀t of national wealth, notwithstanding the tremendous toll on life & limb? ijme.in/articles/polio…

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

"large number of pesticides have been found to produce one or more of the following problems in animals: cancer congenital deformities, liver damage, kidney damage, vomiting, ulcers, cholinesterase inhibition, deliterious effects on the central nervous systems, sterility, leukaemia, convulsions" "There have also been newspaper reports[49] of pesticides producing giddiness and epilepsy in workers. Praful Bidwai[50] has also reported cases of cancer, stunted growth, deformities, and blindness caused by pesticides" "There is a significant statistical cor- relation between the technologies involved in the green revolution and prevalence of the following disabilities in India: amputations, dysfunction of joints, deformities, and visual disabilities" "Some evidence exists that pesticides can cause deformities of limbs and visual disabilities in humans even when taken in low doses" https://www.jstor.org/stable/4376844

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

In these threads we argue that as per the traditional pre-1997 definition in India, disorders such as Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), Transverse Myelitis (TM), Bell's palsy/facial palsy, traumatic neuritis, sciactic never mononeuropathy, Post injection Palsy (PIP) are all polio. Many of the above are also side effects of vaccines and/or injections. https://t.co/zL95wHHJZ3 https://t.co/zrRhjVxxDN https://t.co/cDeYAszL03 https://t.co/t4VmGzTvH0

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) = Polio? “cases of Guillain-Barré’s disease are classified as atypical poliomyelitis” https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(47)90007-7 Brown, J. R., & Baker, A. B. (1947). The diagnosis of Guillain-Barré’s disease. The American Journal of Medicine, 2(1), 45–52.

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

5/ #WorldPolioDay #ThePolioFiles #IndiaFightsPolio #UncomfortableFacts ~67% of polio cases were actually triggered by intramuscular injections: i.e. medical intervention was the cause of two thirds of polio cases. Is it fair to attribute AFP to “communicable” wild polio viruses

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

Transverse Myelitis = Polio? According to this 1914 book titled “A Manual of Infantile Paralysis” transverse myelitis was described as variation in the usual spinal type of poliomyelitis https://archive.org/details/manualofinfantil00frauiala/page/148/mode/2up?q=landry's A Manual of Infantile Paralysis, with Modern Methods of Treatment.

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

Bell's palsy = Polio? In an article in the Journal of American Medical Association in 1941, poliomyelitis was classified into 8 types, of which type VI was labeled as facial paralysis typical of “Bell’s Palsy findings” https://archive.org/details/sim_jama_1941-07-26_117_4/page/270/mode/2up The Journal of the American

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

The Other Side of India's Polio Eradication Story - A presentation by India's Forgotten Babies 0:00 to 0:37: Introduction 0:38 to 2:06: Official Storyline 2:07 to 9:22: Storyline - The unbiased view 9:23 to 12:32: Main causes/triggers of polio pre-1997 12:33 to 19:06: Was polio eradication about reducing incidence of acute flaccid paralysis? 19:07 to 21:04: Side Effects deliberately hidden by “silent majority” 21:05 to 22:43: Coercion to vaccinate 22:44 to 27:07: Vaccine failure ignored? 27:08 to 29:44: 25 doses? What about safety? 29:45 to 40:03: Adverse Events - Media Reports 40:04 to 43:26: Should OPV be replaced with IPV? 43:27 to 45:43: Conclusion Follow India's Forgotten Babies Link: https://t.me/IndiasForgottenBabies and the below handles @vratesh_ @AnhoneeRahasya

Video Transcript AI Summary

The presentation offers a counter view to the mainstream narrative that polio has been eradicated in India. It begins by outlining the official timeline: in 1988, India joined a global commitment to eradicate polio by 2000; India conducted pulse polio immunization drives starting in 1995; officially in 2011 India recorded zero polio cases, and in 2014 the World Health Organization confirmed polio eradication in India. An alternate view is then presented by examining definitions and data. Definition and data issues: the definition of polio changed after 1996. Before 1996, polio cases were diagnosed clinically by physicians; after 1996, India adopted WHO guidelines relying on diagnostics and tests, including detecting polio viruses in stool specimens. In 1997, the definition changed. If a consistent definition is applied (the “old definition” line in a graph), polio was not eradicated but renamed; clinically compatible cases not meeting the WHO criteria were counted as nonpolio acute flaccid paralysis (AFP). Using the WHO definition, polio would appear eradicated, but with a consistent definition, AFP cases rose after 2003–2004, despite intensive pulse polio campaigns. Doctor Yashpal, a former member of India’s polio eradication committee, is cited: up to 1996, all reported AFP cases were labeled as polio; CDC is said to have confirmed that pre-1997 polio cases were reported by attending physicians with no standard case definition. The result is described as deception if one uses a consistent definition. Age and incidence: post-1997, AFP tracking focused on children 15 years and under; cases in older individuals may not be counted, implying higher numbers could exist across all ages. Causes and triggers of polio before 1997: literature notes two major factors. First, intramuscular injections were implicated in triggering a large share of paralytic polio cases (about 67% of paralytic polio). Second, there is a strong correlation between DDT/insecticide use and polio incidence: DDT consumption declined from 12.5 tons in 1980 to 4.4 tons in 1996, and agricultural DDT use peaked in 1978 and was banned in 1989; polio cases declined 1980–1996, aligning with reduced DDT use. This is presented as evidence that injections and environmental poisonings contributed to clinically compatible polio cases, complicating the eradication narrative. Vaccination campaigns and side effects: the narrative asserts that a large majority of polio cases were vaccinated, with many children receiving multiple doses. Data cited include 60–73% of the eligible population vaccinated; in 2007–2009, 96% of polio cases had four or more doses, and in 2007, 85% had seven or more doses. It is argued that the vaccine itself can cause polio (labeled as non-polio CNS conditions) and that vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis and other adverse events occurred but were hidden from the public to boost vaccination uptake. There are references to nine AFP cases with immunization data, including one child with 15 doses and another with 25 doses; associations between oral polio vaccine and conditions like GBS, transverse myelitis, and facial paralysis are acknowledged. Safety and policy critiques: the OPV dosing schedule reportedly increased from the original three doses to seven, ten, and even up to 25 doses in India by 2006; the safety of such extensive dosing is questioned, with the Indian Medical Association cited as expressing concerns. Poliol’s 2017 study reportedly found a strong association between AFP incidence and cumulative vaccine doses. Gagandeep Kang (2017) is cited criticizing the adverse events following immunization (AEFI) system as inadequate, reviewing only about 100 cases per meeting across four meetings annually. Policy recommendations and conclusions: arguments against continuing polio vaccination include a lack of evidence of benefit and evidence of harm; calls for a road map for justice for vaccine victims and families for informed-consent violations and coercion; a call to review all vaccinations beyond polio; and a proposal to exit WHO and international pandemic treaties, asserting that sovereign nations should not follow the dictates of unelected global organizations. Additional context includes media reports of adverse events and compensation for vaccine victims.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The other side of India's polio eradication story, a presentation by India's forgotten babies. This presentation is about polio eradication narrative in India. It is widely believed that polio has been eradicated in India, and this presentation presents a counter view to the mainstream narrative about polio eradication in India. Let's start by taking a look at the official narrative about polio eradication in India. For that, we need to go back in time to 1988 when over a 160 countries had made a commitment to eradicate polio globally by the year 2000, and India was one of those 160 countries that had made the commitment. In order to meet this commitment, India ran a number of pulse polio immunization drives starting in 1995. And over the period of the next sixteen years, officially in 2011, India had recorded zero polio cases. And by 2014, World Health Organization confirmed that polio was officially eradicated in India. So India is considered to have been free of polio since 2011 and to have been officially declared by World Health Organization to be free of polio in 2014. Now let's take a look at an alternate view to this narrative. In order to assess whether the narrative of polio eradication in India and the assertion that polio no longer exists is actually true or not, we need to start with the definition of polio and ask ourselves if there is a consistent definition of polio over, you know, over a period of time. When we look at how polio has been defined, what is evident is that the definition of polio actually changed after 1996. Prior to 1996, polio cases were diagnosed clinically by physicians, by doctors, but after 1996, India chose to adopt a new definition of polio based on WHO's guidelines, which was driven by diagnostics and tests. So there were two or three conditions that were required to be met in order to identify a confirmed case of polio. And one of the main conditions was that polio viruses had to be detected in stool specimens of a suspected polio case. That was the change in definition after 1996, whereas prior to 1996, polio cases were diagnosed by physicians based on, clinical criteria. So what is evident is that in 1997, the definition of polio changed. Now why is this important? It is important because if we apply a consistent definition over a period of time, which is this dark orange line in this graph, if we apply the consistent definition, which is which is labeled as old definition in this graph, what is clear is that polio was not eradicated. It was simply renamed. So if there was a clinical if there was a case that was clinically compatible with polio, but not consistent with the criteria that was laid out by WHO, which was primarily driven by diagnostics and tests or by virological examinations. If a clinically compatible case was not consistent with the parameters that were laid out in WHO's definition, it was not counted as a poll case of polio. It was counted as a case of nonpolio acute flaccid paralysis. What that meant was if we use WHO's definition, then one can argue that polio was eradicated. But even that argument is actually smoke and mirrors because if we use the traditional definition, the cases of acute flaccid paralysis or what was known as polio before 1997 actually skyrocketed. And you'll notice this, period after 2003 or 2004 where it, where polio cases actually went up manifold. And this was the time period where, up in the pretty intensive pulse polio immunizations were carried out. And this is this was in 2004, four or five nations, including Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, and Nigeria, had committed that, they are going to eradicate polio as part of global polio eradication initiative. These were the only four or five countries at that time where polio was endemic. So around 2004, after making that commitment, a series of polio eradication tries were carried out, and we can see that there was a rise in acute flaccid paralysis cases, which pre 1997 used to be called polio. So this is what has been labeled as the unbiased view on this graph, that if we use a consistent definition, we don't go by the smokes and mirrors of diagnostics, polio cases actually polio actually never got eradicated. In fact, after 2004, it skyrocketed. And as far as the contention goes that is it true that the definition changed? This has been confirmed by doctor Yashpal, who was a former member of India's polio eradication committee. He minced no words when he mentioned in one of his write ups that up to 1996, all reported cases of acute flaccid paralysis were labeled as polio. An organization no less than CDC has confirmed that all polio cases report before reported before 1997 were confirmed by attending physicians with no standard case definition. No standard case definition. That is the key. So what is the picture that one gets when one uses a consistent definition of polio? The picture is that of deception. If an assertion is being made that polio got eradicated, That simply isn't true when one applies a consistent definition. Lastly, it's important to note that post 1997, AFP or acute flaccid paralysis cases were being tracked only for children who were 15 years and under. So anybody who was older than 15 years who who was a clinically compatible case of polio, that particular case is not counted in this graph, so these numbers are probably even higher if we include all age groups. What were the main causes and triggers of polio before 1997? That is before the before the change in definition of polio when polio was, clinically diagnosed. If one goes to the literature, two things stand out. One is that sixty seven percent or almost two in every three cases of paralytic polio were actually triggered by intramuscular injections, and there are a series of studies, from the nineties and from the eighties that that show almost every single one of them shows that all the cases that were presenting as paralytic, the paralytic form of polio, right, and polio is considered a central nervous system disorder, so almost two in every thirty three cases or sixty seven percent of the paralytic forms of polio cases. In such cases, the intramuscular injections were triggers for polio. The second thing that stands out is, the, the strong correlation between consumption of DDT, which is an insecticide, and, the incidence of polio. So if we go through the consumption pattern of DDT for India, from the late seventies up until the mid nineties, we'll observe that the consumption of DDT declined by about 65% from 12.5 tons in 1980, to about 4.4 tons in 1996, And what is equally important to observe is that the, the use of DDT in agriculture, which had peaked to about 4.7 tons in 1978, That use of DAT in agriculture was actually banned in 1989, and all these time periods are important because between 1980 and 1996 polio cases declined by eighty two percent, and the the deceleration or the decline in polio incidence was triggered actually, or it it is very noticeable since the late eighties up until the mid to late nineties, which was the time when there was a pretty significant decline in the use of DDT. So two things that seem to have triggered cases of polio or at least cases that are clinically compatible with polio using the modern definition. Two things stand out, one was intramuscular injections and the other was the use of DTT. If we go back to the narrative around polio eradication in India, often, you will hear that polio has been eradicated in India, and the proof of that lies in the fact that we don't see too many cases of children, especially suffering from, paralysis, which is kind of, you know, paralytic polio. I mean, those were the images that were shown, during the polio vaccination campaign days where that basically suffering from polio was indication of paralysis where, the limbs are immobilized for example, and the picture that was created was that polio immunization campaigns are actually reducing the incidence of flaccid paralysis or acute flaccid paralysis, but this is far from the truth. We've already demonstrated that cases of acute flaccid paralysis actually skyrocketed after the intensive intensification of pulse polio immunization campaigns, and a person no less than doctor T Jacob John, who was the chairman of polio eradication committee, he made the statement that what is under eradication. He's on record making the statement by the way. He said that what is under eradication a wild poliovirus is not the incidence of acute flaccid paralysis. Therefore, the criteria for eradication is the absence of polioviruses from stool specimens. In other words, officially, while, unofficially or, through through media campaigns, people were made to believe that what was under eradication was paralysis due to polio. What was actually under eradication was, wild polio viruses from the stool specimens, which seems to have little to do with the incidence of acute flaccid paralysis. Now in this chart on the in this slide on the left, you will see an example of Nepal. If you look at Nepal's, AFP numbers, acute flaccid paralysis numbers in 1998 and 1999, you'll see that there was a threefold increase in acute flaccid paralysis cases from 1998 to 1999, but at the same time, there was a decrease of forty percent in the incidence of poliomyelitis cases. So how is it possible that while acute flaccid paralysis went up threefold, the incidence of polio almost halved, and the secret to that lies in the number of the percentage of suspected polio cases that were tested in the lab where the stool specimens were available. So in 1998, stool specimens were available only for thirty five percent of the suspected polio cases, whereas in 1999, stool specimens were available for seventy nine percent of the suspected polio cases, which means that higher the number of stool specimens, lower the number of confirmed polio cases. And this has shown up in study after study. So if we go all the way back to 1956, there was a study of, polio incidents in Washington Washington State and United States, and there they found that in, out of two hundred and fifty suspected cases of polio, the virus was found in only fourteen percent or fourteen point eight percent of the stool specimens. So that's one in every six cases of suspected polio, the virus was detected through laboratory methods. And there are if one goes back to and reads the literature from the late forties and fifties, there are multiple people who say that virological tests alone do not, cannot be used to rule out a case of polio. This is a very, very important assertion that you cannot use virological tests alone to rule out a case of polio. In fact, it can be argued that is virus the sole cause of polio or even a necessary precondition for the existence of polio disease given the fact that polio is triggered by intramuscular injections, given the fact that polio is triggered by environmental poisoning due to DDT and other insecticides. Can one say with confidence that virus is the sole cause of polio? If virus is not the sole cause of polio and if virological examinations are not enough to rule out polio, why was it that virological examination of stool specimen is what was relied on to count a polio case after 1996. What is important to understand in this entire process is that this vaccination campaign that was carried out over several years in India, where millions of children were vaccinated multiple times, There is no evidence to suggest that this examination was carried out or rather this immunization was carried out to reduce the incidence of paralysis, flaccid paralysis. One of the most glaring aspects of India's polio eradication program is the fact that certain well known side effects were deliberately hidden from the masses. People were not warned about the side effects. Parents were not warned about these side effects, and campaign after campaign with the full blessings of influencers actually seemed to indicate that this was a risk free option. Vaccination was a risk free option for for the target population, which was the children. But if we look at the literature, there are several instances where doctors, who were, involved in this polio eradication campaign openly admit that they know about a condition known as vaccine associated paralytic poliomyelitis, which is a side effect of the polio vaccines. Doctors knew about this. The WHO knew about this, the UNICEF knew about this, but this fact was deliberately deliberately hidden from the masses in order to ensure maximum vaccination uptake. The fact that the vaccine itself can cause polio was hidden from the masses in order to ensure maximum vaccination uptake. This is a clear violation of informed consent, and the question needs to be asked as to whether an illegal act was cons illegal act played out because informed consent was suppressed. Not just was important information hidden from the masses, hidden from the parents, On top of that, the public health authority authorities actually doubled down. The bureaucrats doubled down by literally coercing people to vaccinate their children. On this slide, there's an example that is shown, which was published in one of the journals by doctor Yashpal, where there was a parent who refused to vaccinate his child with the polio vaccination, and the price that he paid as a result of his refusal was that his ration was canceled and power supply was disconnected, and he was used as an example for others that others would have to pay the same price if they did not vaccinate their children. So this is the kind of coercion which is clearly illegal because vaccination is voluntary, But this is the kind of coercion that played out on top of the unethical act of withholding side information relate side of information of side effects of the polio vaccine. The other piece of information that is often ignored is that a huge majority of the polio cases were actually vaccinated, and they were vaccinated with multiple doses. So to to think that a medical product can eradicate a disease despite the fact that a vast majority of those who are actually suffering from the disease are vaccinated is, that circular reasoning. And in on this slide, we show that despite the fact that an estimated sixty seven to seventy three percent of the eligible population was vaccinated, if we look at the numbers from 2007 to 2009, ninety six percent of the polio cases had received four or more doses of the vaccine. And in 2007 itself, eighty five percent of the polio cases had received seven or more doses of the polio vaccine. So clearly, it appears as if there was a disproportionately high incidence of polio in the vaccinated cases. Why was this failure of the efficacy of the vaccine ignored? Why wasn't it looked at more deeply? We have to think about it. We have to look at this information in the backdrop of the fact that the vaccine itself can cause polio, which is labeled as non polio, so it doesn't even show up in these numbers that are shown in this table here. So the vaccine caused polio, which is labeled as non polio, is a side effect, which was hidden from the masses. We will show in a subsequent slide that the vaccine can also cause other polio like illnesses such as transverse myelitis and Guillain Barre syndrome or GBS. And polio itself when it came to the incidence of polio itself, a very, very high percentage of the cases were vaccinated. On the basis of this, would it be reasonable to suggest that this vaccination campaign was a success? The other important thing to notice here is that not just a very high percentage of polio cases were vaccinated, but a very high percentage of acute flaccid paralysis cases seem to have been vaccinated, at least based on some of the anecdotal pieces of evidence here. So on this chart, for example, there are nine cases of acute flaccid paralysis that are listed, out of which, immunization data was available for eight. In two cases, there was a residual paralysis, and in both these cases, the number of vaccine doses received was extraordinarily high. So in one case, in one case of acute flaccid paralysis, the child had received 15 doses of the vaccine, and another case of acute flaccid paralysis, the child had received an astonishing 25 of the vaccine. And we know from published research that there is some association between the oral polio vaccine and, specific conditions of acute flaccid paralysis such as GBS transverse myelitis and facial paralysis. So we know we now know that the vaccine itself can cause polio, which is labeled as nonpolio. A high percentage of polio cases were vaccinated. A high percentage of acute flaccid paralysis cases were vaccinated. On what basis can we say that the vaccination program was a success? The vaccine that was administered in India is called the oral polio vaccine, and it was invented by doctor Albert Sabin, and the original dosage schedule of this vaccine was three doses that was used in the developed world. In cases of tropical country like India, it was found that three doses are not effective, so the dosage was increased gradually to seven doses, and it was reported that seventy million children in India in 2006 had received as many as ten doses, and many children had received of an astonishing twenty five doses. The question is, when the original dosage schedule was three doses, and that was increased to five to seven to ten and then to twenty five, What about the side effects or the negative impact of giving so many doses? Was there ever a safety study that was done? And, it's really, really hard to find any safety study or any study to suggest that so many doses of the polio vaccine were actually safe. In fact, the Indian Medical Association had raised concerns about giving an indiscriminate number of doses, as per an article in the Times of India in 2006. And in that article, the journalist had suggested that the government was ignoring concerns of the Indian Medical Association. There was a very important piece of research that was done by doctor Poliol, which was published in 2017, that showed a very strong association between the incidence of acute flaccid paralysis and the cumulative number of doses. So, clearly, the only inference one can make is that this vaccination program probably caused a lot of suffering and misery. In 2017, doctor Gagandeep Kang, who's a former member of NTAGI, the national technical advisory group on immunizations in India, she was quoted as saying that the adverse events falling immunization system in India is inadequate because only hundred only, only four hundred cases of adverse events are reviewed every year, hundred per meeting. So there are four meetings that are held, and in each meeting only 100 cases are reviewed, which is astonishingly low given the thousands of adverse events that are reported. So long story short, the adverse events or the AFI system, the adverse events following immunization system in India was less than adequate, and it was not capturing anything close. It was likely not capturing anything close to the actual number of adverse events or and the actual number of serious adverse events that were happening on the ground. Now on this slide, we've listed a few media reports about adverse events following polio vaccination. There's a report about a death that had occurred, and then there are a couple of reports about compensation that was paid to, vaccine victims or the families of vaccine victims following death or following, paralysis, due to the vaccination or in days following the vaccination when such adverse events took place. So there were media reports about that. And in the following slides, we are going to play three media reports of incidences such as loss of eyesight, acute flaccid paralysis, and brain stroke following vaccination. Some of the authorities in India have argued that the oral polio vaccine should be replaced with the IPV or injectable polio vaccine. This is what was done in much of the developed world, and India should follow the same path. So the question is, should OPV be replaced with IPV, the injectable polio vaccine? And the argument that is made in this particular slide has started, no, it should not. And there are three primary reasons why it shouldn't. There's a scientific case against IPV, there's an ethical case against IPV, and there's a financial case against IPV. The scientific case is, in order to understand the scientific case, we have to go back to the 1950s when the injectable polio vaccine was first rolled out, and it was found there were multiple reports about its lack of effectiveness, the fact that it did not prevent transmission, and it also had side effects. There was a case study of paralysis following the Salk vaccine, then there was the infamous Qatar incident. So as per a study in the Bulletin of the World Health Organization in 1960, it was acknowledged that the the inactivated vaccine had very, very limited effectiveness and because of which repeated revaccination was necessitated. So that's the scientific case. Then there's an ethical case. IPV is being recommended by the same authorities who had recommended OPV. And as we've argued in this presentation, OPV has caused a lot of damage. So the fact that the same entities who had recommended OPV are recommending IPV, one can argue that there's a major trust deficit there, and therefore, whether the suggestions of the same entities were involved in architecting the oral polio vaccination program, whether the same entity should be trusted or not. That is a big question, big question mark. And lastly, there's a financial case against IPV. So according to doctor Pollyol's report, between 1994 and 2012, India spent 2,500,000,000 US dollars, on the vaccination programs. Based on the presentation done, based on this presentation, it can be argued that that was not money well spent. And, therefore, to continue to, to continue with the vaccination program would be, further strain on the financial resources without any benefit. In fact, as we've argued, it's likely caused a lot of harm. To conclude, there are these four points that we would like to make. One, there is a very strong case for ending all ongoing polio vaccinations because there's no evidence of benefit, and there is evidence of a fair amount of harm. Secondly, there needs to be a road map for justice for vaccine victims and their families given the fact that in the principle of informed consent was violated, given the fact that there was coercion. There has to be a road map for justice for vaccine victims and their families and for every single person who was misinformed and misled by the vaccination program. The third piece recommendation here is that there needs to be a thorough review of all vaccinations, not just the polio vaccine. The polio vaccine was the largest vaccination drive in India prior to the COVID nineteen vaccines, but there are several other vaccines that are that have made it to the immunization schedule on the advice of the same entities, that pushed forth the polio vaccination program. So therefore, there's a very strong need to review all vaccinations. And lastly, there is a strong case to be made to exit World Health Organization and all any international pandemic treaties, given the fact that what was observed in the polio vaccination program and more recently in the COVID vaccination program was the obsession to meet vaccination targets at the cost of bodily autonomy and informed consent. So this is a very, very important factor that one needs to think about is, why should a sovereign nation actually follow the dictat of unelected, unaccountable so called global organizations.

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

https://vratesh.substack.com/p/the-other-side-of-indias-polio-eradication https://t.co/40vCFrVqZ2

@vratesh_ - Vratesh Srivastava

@drkohilathas @awakenindiamvmt @awakenindiamov https://vratesh.substack.com/p/the-other-side-of-indias-polio-eradication https://t.co/7zgq659nRT

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

unroll @threadreaderapp

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

https://t.co/kJ5vUORPhK

@awakenindiamvmt - Awaken India Movement

For the vaccine bubble to burst, and innocent children to be saved from devastating consequences, it is important to understand the decades' claim that vaccines have eradicated diseases or reduced incidence of specific diseases is a LIE. One of the most important tools to keep this lie going is to simply rename the disease to something else, from polio to acute flaccid myelitis for example. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8CdECxzryI

Video Transcript AI Summary

The segment highlights a growing concern about acute flaccid myelitis (AFM), a mysterious paralysis affecting children. Doctors and parents are on high alert as more cases are identified nationwide. The report notes that NBC News contacted health departments and found that, so far this year, there are at least 84 AFM cases under investigation across 25 states. The condition has been monitored by NBC News since 2014, and the program emphasizes that the majority of children affected continue to experience some element of disability or weakness even four years after onset. The coverage includes a personal perspective from families affected by AFM. Three-year-old Carter Roberts, who was diagnosed two years prior to the segment, is described as a tough child, but like about half of the children with AFM, he never fully recovered. Carter died three weeks before the broadcast, and his mother uses his story to caution other parents to stay vigilant for potential AFM symptoms. Witness accounts and medical guidance in the report underscore the seriousness of AFM symptoms. Parents are urged to be vigilant for signs such as arms or legs that aren’t working, a floppy or weak-looking head, or respiratory symptoms that don’t align with typical illnesses. The program stresses that AFM is rare, but the appearance and spread of cases have prompted an urgent search for answers about why the condition is occurring more frequently and how it spreads. The segment repeats the core message from medical professionals: AFM can be a devastating condition with lasting consequences for many children, and public health officials are actively investigating its causes and patterns of transmission. Doctor John Torres contributes to the reporting, framing the ongoing investigation and the national concern around the condition. The report closes with a call to stay informed and aware, reinforcing that AFM remains a topic of concern for families and clinicians alike as investigators seek to understand its etiology, trajectory, and potential preventive measures.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Tonight, doctors and parents on alert as more children across the country are developing a mysterious paralysis called acute flaccid myelitis. Speaker 1: It might always stay like this. She might never regain full recovery of her arms. Speaker 0: NBC News reached out to health departments across the country and learned that so far this year, there are at least eighty four cases being investigated in 25 states. Speaker 2: So we've been following children with this condition since 2014. The majority continue to have some element of disability or weakness even four years out from onset. Speaker 1: If this can happen to our family, it can happen to anyone. Speaker 0: We met three year old Carter Roberts two years ago, just weeks after he was diagnosed. He strikes me as a tough kid. But like half of the children with AFM, Carter never recovered, and three weeks ago, he passed away. His mother now warning all parents to be aware of the symptoms. Speaker 1: Be vigilant in looking out for, you know, arms or legs not working, that floppy head, those respiratory symptoms that don't seem, you know, consistent with other basic illnesses. Speaker 0: Tonight, an urgent search for answers to why this rare disease is spreading. Doctor John Torres, NBC News. Hey, NBC News fans. Thanks for checking out our YouTube channel. Subscribe by clicking on that button down here, and click on any of the videos over here to watch the latest interviews, show highlights, and digital exclusives. Thanks for watching.

@gyan_chakshu - Gyan Chakshu

Polio has not been eradicated even in the West. It’s called ‘polio like illness’ or ‘acute flaccid myelitis’ (AFM). All these cases used to be classified as polio b4 the introduction of the polio vaccines. @DrJBhattacharya please research more…. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna922011 https://t.co/yqBbhI4sKT