reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @babybeginner

reSee.it AI Summary
I’m recounting a Wi Spa incident where a man exposed himself in the ladies’ area while women and children were present. Bystanders argued it was not okay; protests followed, with some supporting the flasher. Critics were told to avert their eyes. California Civil Code 51 allegedly requires men in women’s spaces, making women-only areas illegal. The man was a registered sex offender. A heroine named Cubana Angel spoke up.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

1. Some people don’t know how bad things are now. Let me tell you the story about the Wi Spa. It’s a spa where people are unclothed in certain areas. A man walked into the ladies area with parts swinging. They ran to tell the front desk. Video pt 1. https://t.co/Ol2tr9ohjC

Video Transcript AI Summary
One participant insists that it’s unacceptable for a man to enter the women’s section and expose his penis to women and young girls, arguing that WE Spa condones such behavior. They question, β€œIs that what you’re saying? Like I asked. It’s he’s he could stay there. He could stay there?” They assert a sexual orientation claim, stating, β€œSexual orientation. What sexual orientation? I see a dick. Sexual orientation. It lets me know he’s a man,” and repeatedly declare, β€œHe he is a man. He is a man. He is not no female. He is not a female.” They emphasize that β€œGirls down there, other women who are highly offended for what they just saw, and you did nothing, absolutely nothing. In fact, you sided with him.” They accuse WE Spa of being β€œan agreement with men that just say they are a woman and they can go down there with their penis and get into the women’s section,” asking, β€œIs that what you’re saying? What law?” They note that β€œThey pulled everything back. So women can go into the men’s with their breasts,” and state they won’t return, saying, β€œEverything needs money. Yeah. Get your money back. Every everything. You got a man with his penis talking about he’s a woman. He ain’t no woman.” They question whether the person is transgender, asserting, β€œAre you talking to that I’m transgender? There’s no such thing as transgender. He has a dick. Shut the fuck up. Okay? He has penis hanging out.” They add, β€œHe and your daddy.” They conclude they are a woman who knows how to stand up for their rights, insisting, β€œAs a woman, I have a right to feel comfortable without a man exposing himself.” They reiterate, β€œNo. He’s not a transgender. He has a penis just like…” The other participant briefly attempts to calm the situation, saying, β€œYou don’t so it’s okay. I just wanna be clear with you. It’s okay.” They acknowledge, β€œOkay?,” and the discussion ends with the first participant asserting their stance against the presence of a man with a penis in the women’s area.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't so it's okay. I just wanna be clear with you. It's okay. Speaker 1: It's okay for a man to go into the women's section, show his penis around the other women, young little girls underage, your spa, we spa, condone that. Is that what you're saying? Like I asked. It's he's he could stay there. He could stay there? Sexual orientation. What sexual orientation? I see a dick. Sexual orientation. It lets me know he's a man. He he is a man. He is a man. He is not no female. He is not a female. He is not a female. Hold on. He is not a female, sweetie. Okay? Girls down there, other women who are highly offended for what they just saw, and you did nothing, absolutely nothing. In fact, you sided with him. So WE Spa is an agreement with men that just say they are a woman and they can go down there with their penis and get into the women's section. Is that what you're saying? What what really? What law? What law? They pulled everything back. So women can go into the men's with their breasts. I'm not gonna come back. It's the first time. Okay. And then this and then this should happen then. We're not gonna come back. Yeah. You shouldn't. Y'all wouldn't come back either. Everything needs money. Yeah. Get your money back. Every everything. You got a man with his penis talking about he's a woman. He ain't no woman. Uh-uh. Yeah. Give her her money back. Are you talking to that I'm transgender? There's no such thing as transgender. He has a dick. Shut the fuck up. Okay? He has a penis. He has penis hanging out. Speaker 0: He and your daddy. Speaker 1: Okay. No. I'm not one. Actually, I'm a woman who knows how to stand up and speak up for my right. As a woman, I have a right to feel comfortable without a man exposing himself. Okay? No. You go somewhere else. Okay. So that's right. Transgender. No. He's not a transgender. He has a penis just Speaker 0: like

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

2. There were women and children in the area. Children. Watch this bystander β€œexplain” to her why this ok. https://t.co/hScatLcTti

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 expresses that the situation is traumatizing and asserts that as a woman there is a space reserved for women. She questions the right of a transgender person to be in that space, stating, "he has a penis. A full and testicle. Okay? And and I don't care what it it's a man. You got one? You're a man." She argues that if they entered the men's section based on anatomy, it would be a man, and notes that they may not like women, but that for her and many other women, they do not feel comfortable and "it's not okay." She adds, "I'm sorry to talk to Okay? So well, I yeah. Yeah. You're sorry. You should be, sweetie, and you're out of alignment, and this is not right." She implies the other person is out of alignment and suggests attention to the situation, even commenting on the other person’s personal circumstances: "it must be hard not being a real man. Try it." She urges that every woman get all of their information. Speaker 0 responds, discussing a security guard who said that this is not allowed. Speaker 1 disregards the security guard's stance, insisting she does not care what the security guard says. Speaker 0 clarifies that the security guard doesn't want to be involved, and Speaker 1 insists that the guard should not have been present or allowed in the space. The exchange centers on whether a transgender person should be in the women's space and the authorities' stance on access. The discussion highlights discomfort, boundaries, and perceived inappropriateness from the perspective of Speaker 1, while Speaker 0 defers to the security guard's position. The dialogue ends with an emphatic consolidation of their stance: "Exactly. Thank you. Exactly. No."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To do. Are you are you are you are you So I understand the Speaker 1: story. Yeah. Okay. It's not okay. Speaker 0: It's not okay. Speaker 1: That's traumatizing to see that. I'm a woman. Girl. I think this is a place right here. I'm told only for women. So how dare you sit up here and tell me I don't have a right as a woman. No. I don't. Has a transgender. I'm telling you he has a penis. Speaker 0: And Speaker 1: A full and testicle. Okay? And and I don't care what it it's a man. You got one? You're a man. Speaker 0: Okay. And if we went into the men's section with our anatomy, that would be Speaker 1: a man. Well, it wouldn't probably, but you might not like women, so it might not. Okay? And we don't know. But for me and for a lot of other women, they do not feel comfortable, and it's not okay. I'm sorry to talk to Okay? So well, I yeah. Yeah. You're sorry. You should be, sweetie, and you're out of alignment, and this is not right. I can tell you that much. Alright? And I know you're out of work. Yeah. It must be hard. It must be hard not being a real man. Try it. So like I said, I want every woman get all of their information. There's a security guard Speaker 0: who said that that is not allowed. Okay. Well, I Speaker 1: I don't care what the security guard. Speaker 0: Who's the security? Telling you that sometimes creditors go down and will just go through the woman's side. Speaker 1: Okay. Well, no. He's sitting in there. Okay. Well, security Speaker 0: No. No. No. He doesn't wanna be. Speaker 1: Oh, okay. I'm just saying he shouldn't Speaker 0: not been allowed. To. Exactly. Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly. Speaker 0: Exactly. We know that. Speaker 1: Exactly. Thank you. Exactly. No.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

3. No comment. https://t.co/C9wARB1zNI

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes an incident at the WE Spa where a man enters the women's section with his penis exposed, causing fear among women and young girls. β€œIt's not okay. Now I can't even go and put my clothes on because he's down there. Yeah. I don't feel comfortable. We don't feel uncomfortable.” The speaker emphasizes that this behavior happened in the women’s section, with the implication that a man came into an area designated for women and girls, and asserts that β€œhis dick is out. To the campus side? Yeah. His dick is slinging left and right, and we're women in there, and young girls are there.” The speaker challenges the arrangement, stating, β€œAnd you allow that. So then you're lying.” They argue that there is a distinction between gender rights and discrimination, claiming that β€œWe cannot discriminate against gender rights. It's not discrimination. It's an impostor. You cannot identify a impostor, someone faking to be a woman just because they feel like they wanna call themselves a woman.” There is a dismissive stance toward the idea of recognizing someone’s gender identity in this context, with a reference to being β€œpre board” as a test they don’t care about. Speaker 1 interjects with a repetition of β€œa situation,” emphasizing that there will be consequences or a response: β€œYou gonna have a situation.” Speaker 0 responds with escalating emotion, invoking religious language: β€œThe blood of Jesus. You're gonna have a situation. There’s going to be a situation.” They report being at the WE Spa and witnessing a man slinging his penis, expressing disbelief and stating that some women are afraid to speak up, while they themselves are determined to speak out: β€œI couldn’t believe what I saw. I couldn’t believe that this man, okay, and these people up here and you got some women scared to say something. Baby, I'm not scared to say a thing.” Speaker 0 asserts a strong stance against a man asserting entrance into the men’s section or a person presenting as a woman while being male, stressing concern for children and mothers present: β€œThe blood of Jesus against this wilding out lion spirit. Sit up here. Gonna bring him to let a man come in here, slinging his penis up in here. No. No. No.” The speaker insists that somebody who identifies as a man cannot enter the women’s area, or that someone claiming to be a woman but possessing male anatomy should be challenged. The speaker ends with a warning that β€œthese people, they about to find out though. Watch.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's not okay. Now I can't even go and put my clothes on because he's down there. Yeah. I don't feel comfortable. We don't feel uncomfortable. Person do anything to His his dick is out. To the campus side? Yeah. His dick is slinging left and right, and we're women in there, and young girls are there. And it says women. That's the women's section. There's the men's section. Do understand? And you allow that. So then you're lying. We cannot discriminate against gender rights. It's not discrimination. It's an impostor. You cannot identify a impostor, someone faking to be a woman just because they feel like they wanna call themselves a woman. I wonder if they are pre board. Pre on board. I don't give a listen. Listen. Listen, lady. Okay? Listen. Please stop trying to get me to understand you. No. I'm just letting you know our situation. I understood you Okay. Well, you guys gonna have a situation. You gonna have Speaker 1: a situation. You gonna have a situation. You gonna have a situation. Speaker 0: The blood of Jesus. You're gonna have a situation. There's going to be a situation. I'm up I'm up here at the at the WE Spa, and a man, okay, comes in slinging his penis. I I almost wanna fall out. I couldn't believe what I saw. I couldn't believe that this man, okay, and these people up here and you got some women scared to say something. Baby, I'm not scared to say a thing. The blood of Jesus against this wilding out lion spirit. Sit up here. Gonna bring him to let a man come in here, slinging his penis up in here. No. No. No. You best believe I'm gonna say something. I'm gonna say something alright sitting up here. Like, this stuff is okay. He needs to get up out of here. I know. So so since somebody can come in here and say, oh, I'm a man. And because I'm a man, I can go into the men's section. Or or you could come in here and say, I'm a woman, but you're really a man with a penis. Or let's just say you have a dick and testicles, and and they're gonna let you come in here. You got children, young girls here with their mom, and and and it Jesus help me. Jesus. These people, they about to find out though. Watch.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

4. People were outraged that this was allowed. They protested. Antifa, the people all in black, came out to support the MAN who had exposed himself. They hit people who objected. https://t.co/YfNa68CJk6

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that white supremacists who came with planned, premeditated threats were not peaceful, and states, β€œI don’t have to be peaceful. I don’t owe anybody peace.” They reference a sign described as β€œPiece of shit. That sign.” A few weeks later, felony indecent exposure charges were filed against this registered sex offender.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Get the the camera. Camera. Very peaceful of you. I'm not I don't have to be peaceful. They're not peaceful. The white supremacists that came out here with planned fucking premeditated threats were not peaceful. I don't have to be peaceful. I don't owe anybody peace. Piece of shit. That sign. Several weeks later, felony indecent exposure charges were filed against this registered sex offender.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

5. When people stated how awful this was for the little girl, they were told she shouldn’t look. SHE should just avert her eyes when a man exposes himself to her. https://t.co/7k1qcCEh3U

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

6. The LAW in California requires that men be allowed into a ladies locker room. See California Civil Code 51. It is now illegal for a business to offer a women only space for women to change in. Illegal. Read that statue. That’s how bad it is now.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

7. By the way, that man is a registered sex offender. (This all took place in 2021). https://t.co/MfaiVDC4AC

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

8. The heroine in this story, the woman who spoke up in the first place is named Cubana Angel on that site with the photos that shall not be named. SHE spoke up. No matter what, that little girl will always know that someone spoke up for her.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@MaureenSaysNo Every one of them!!!! And most people have no idea what happened.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@saodna They were terrible. Terrifying. Terrorists. All in support of a flasher!

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@popsicles10 I do!!

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@DarthBalabusta She is awesome!! I love her!!!

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@Hillary60363296 That soy boy needs his grandmother to grab him by the ear.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@TheOthe87166293 Yes he would. I’m so sorry. I know what that was like for you. πŸ˜”πŸ˜”πŸ˜”

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@McqValen31808 She is a star!!!

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@kpssreality So many people are new to all of this so I thought we should let them know what happened.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@2022Teacake Maybe it will others. Keep telling the tale.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@OldKeto Ah. The good ole days.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@cazjj Isn’t it the worst? I do believe this man is coming up for trial soon.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@fairyforemother Exactly.

Saved - September 11, 2025 at 6:37 PM

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

URGENT. FYI. After Charlie Kirk, on the sky app there are people asking for the next person to be targeted. These include JK Rowling, Matt Walsh, Trump, Ben Shapiro, Libs of TikTok, Elon Musk, and Andy Ngo. I took as many screenshots as I could. https://t.co/CnZmmJAjvh

Saved - September 4, 2025 at 12:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been reflecting on the recent events surrounding JK Rowling and Graham Linehan. It’s alarming that he was arrested for defending women and speaking out against the intrusion of men into women’s spaces. This situation raises questions about freedom of speech and the protection of women. Many in the UK seem afraid to voice their opinions, and I stand with those who are silenced. It feels like a broken system when expressing disdain for misogyny can lead to arrest, while harmful rhetoric goes unchecked. We need to speak up for what’s right.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

JK Rowling writes in defense of women and gets these messages sent to her. These are ok. Graham Lineham stands up for her and other women. And he has five officers come to the airport to arrest him. I’ll show you his posts below. A thread. 1/ https://t.co/eGo1HabjiA

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

He has been arrested for saying this. Was it the four letter word they found harmed their sensibilities? Are we supposed to love these groups? Seriously. You’re not allowed to say this???? Tell me how you avoid arrest then. Stay mute? 2/ https://t.co/wy0kGppsGx

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Were they afraid you could smell that photo? 3/ https://t.co/yOcFNfTGTf

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Or was it someone saying that women should stand up to the gigantic men who barge into their bathrooms and showers? Just a couple of years ago everyone knew to do this to any man who walked into women’s spaces. REMEMBER??? Bc it’s not ok to do this to women!!!!!! 4/ https://t.co/74kxDDdRv2

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

I don’t know if any of my UK friends are allowed to speak up at all. They must be terrified. For all of them who cannot speak, we will. Shout it with me!!!! I STAND WITH GLINNER. The UK protects the men who harm women and arrests the men who protect us.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@sensemostcommon It couldn’t be more broken.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@TimPreston93673 @lauren_vasiliou Yup. Sorry! Here’s some more! https://t.co/rbjCtDsf1u

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@LinRich182701 She knows all about them.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@Raven80504432 He needs to claim asylum in the US.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@FaredaVandeKaap These kinds of sentiments are so ubiquitous that people know they can walk around like this and this is just fine. Say you hate misogynists and that gets you arrested? https://t.co/66fBVFniy4

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@ChantAngle64 Well, those words are worse than anything he said. Should @metpoliceuk come and arrest you? Those are really hurty words. Much more hurty than saying that you hate misogynists. https://t.co/Qp8VjqyNtj

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@RammaLee Yeah. This is what I mean. This is the β€œkind” side. The side that can do no wrong. You’ll notice I said nothing to this person. But because I know that boys are not girls this person says this to me with impunity. https://t.co/o6E3wmI5uG

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@Olicanarama @barrienunn21 If you are going to interpret the law then I have thousands of posts and actions that are actual threats. These are dangerous people. Actually dangerous people. https://t.co/vq4uwkhKPi

reSee.it AI Summary
I feel compelled to address the misunderstandings surrounding the Holocaust and the meaning of genocide. This thread is challenging but necessary. I highlight Kristallnacht, the destruction of Jewish businesses, and the reality of concentration camps like Buchenwald and Ohrdruf. It's crucial to recognize that comparing the exclusion of men from women's sports to genocide is inappropriate. Each "like" on these posts symbolizes support for those who suffered and serves as a reminder that we must preserve the true meaning of genocide.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Once again I have to put this thread together for people who don’t seem to know what the Holocaust was or what the word genocide means. This thread will be tough reading. But it’s needed. So enter at your own risk. You are strenuously warned. 1/

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

2/ https://t.co/WxbI5FtUZq

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

This is Kristallnacht. The night that Jewish businesses were destroyed. 3/ https://t.co/OCdFBMmQ50

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Telling men to get out of women’s sports is not genocide. 4/ https://t.co/AGVvDttvLJ

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

These are concentration camps. 5/ https://t.co/H0OaSlYgdW

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

A man not being allowed to play on a ladies volleyball team is not the same thing. 6/

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Buchenwald, Ohrdruf, Woebblin concentration camps. You probably haven’t even heard of two of these. This is what genocide looks like. 7/ https://t.co/VPSZpfwOfY

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Consider every β€œlike” on these posts to be a little piece of your heart sent to the people who endured this. Consider it a reminder that this should never happen again. And that we need words to have MEANING. The word genocide means THIS. 8/

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Genocide means this. To those that would appropriate this word to apply to keeping a boy out of a girls’ sports competition: just don’t. 9/ https://t.co/xfn2QbXo7H

Saved - December 14, 2024 at 3:45 PM

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Thread. Fantastic news!! The girls are standing up!! A couple of high school cross country runners wore a shirt that said Save Girl’s Sports. The school disciplined them. In response 150 other girls wore the same shirt! The school can’t discipline them all! 1/ https://t.co/JdQc9kOZ57

Saved - September 15, 2024 at 10:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Keith Olbermann, a 65-year-old man, has been sending a concerning number of messages to Riley Gaines, which feels targeted and inappropriate. His comments range from personal attacks to bizarre remarks, including calling her a future bad parent and making mean comments about President Trump. It’s unsettling to see an elderly man behaving like a jilted suitor towards a young swimmer. This behavior is not just unacceptable; it’s bullying. We need to stand up and protect Riley from this harassment. Thank you, Riley, for advocating for women and girls.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Ongoing story. Keith Olberman, a 65 year old man, has been sending stunning to Riley Gaines. This isn’t normal X banter. This is wrong. This is targeted. The makeup and sheer amount of these messages is shocking. Thread. 1/ https://t.co/UXyaSk85At

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Calling her a future bad parent? Dude. Come on. 2/ https://t.co/haEcvOStav

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Why would an elderly man who is possibly in Depends by this point, stalk this young swimmer? She isn’t into you, guy. 3/ https://t.co/vFUp8rKsNk

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

It’s like he is a jilted suitor. The messages don’t stop. 4/ https://t.co/oonUpASHEQ

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

He sure has a fascination with a particular word. 5/ https://t.co/1NrevqEHPZ

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Again. He is 65 years old shouting this at a young woman. 6/ https://t.co/DJs20Cuhm3

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Here he calls her names so he can hawk his business. 7/ https://t.co/2ciwocS6c7

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Here he talks about President Trump and her. I can’t even quote this one. This comment is so mean. 8/ https://t.co/K20nNwgaCx

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

This is bizarre bullying from an old man to a young beautiful woman. One was bad, two were not good, by the time we get to 8 or more it’s a real problem. It’s not ok to talk to anyone like this. This toothpaste needs to go back in the tube. This must stop. 9/ https://t.co/2s9QKImnuB

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

It’s up to us to protect this young woman from him. This is really something. Shocking.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

@Riley_Gaines_ I got your back. Thank you for standing up for women and girls and protecting their privacy and sports. It’s unreal that you’d get an elderly man stalking you for that. What a world we live in. Protect Riley!!

Saved - September 11, 2024 at 11:05 PM

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

They did it!! The girls said no! The school said no! The Dighton-Rehobeth Regional School District will refuse to play Somerset Berkeley High School in field hockey bc they have male players on the girls’ team. 1/ https://t.co/DW0UdQHGeP

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Every woman standing up to this is a hero. And sometimes we need a hug. https://t.co/ezteNRhwEq

reSee.it AI Summary
The battle over language is crucial. Initially, we agreed on the term "transwoman." But suddenly, a shift occurred, demanding a space between "trans" and "woman." Disagreement meant being labeled a bigot. Now, "trans" is an adjective, colonizing the word "woman." Laws have been rewritten, erasing the concept of women. This battle is existential, as they take our words. But we won't surrender. Words matter. Women exist. We reclaim our word for adult human females. Men are men.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

On the importance of language: We started with transwoman. You were threatened if you did not use the new term. We were all β€œnice”. We agreed. What’s in a word? Sure. If that makes you feel happy. Ok. We were kind. Then something happened. We we were saying transwoman - a noun to denote a person living a particular lifestyle. All was good. Then it switched. And the switch was dramatic, fast, and full of vicious threats. Suddenly the space was demanded. Trans woman. Not transwoman any more. It’s just a space. Who could complain? Whatever. If you said TW with no space you were a bigot, a monster, a transphobe. The space was demanded. Required. Style books rewritten. News outlets instructed. And what was that about? You could see it in real time. It was a wave. Why? Now trans became an adjective. And woman was the noun. It was an instant colonization of the word woman. Dictionaries have been rewritten. School children taught the new word. And the phrase means that is a KIND of woman. You can offer it up as some kind of compromise thinking you are meaning something else, but that’s like saying I’m happy to call you an apple. You’re just using the words incorrectly in your own head. Trans woman means there is a kind of person who is trans and that particular person is a woman. It makes no difference what you think you’re saying. It matters what it means. And it means this in LAW now. What a clever trick. Who needs to rewrite laws if you have redefined the words used in them. This is the definition now in the UNRUH civil rights act in California (cal civil code 51). By LAW women may not have a single sex space because by LAW women no longer exist. Not as you know the word anyway. Did you know the TRAs don’t have a word that means adult human female in their language? Ask them. You’ll see. You can’t speak of a group that doesn’t have a word. This is an existential battle and they have taken our words. We are taking them back. Words MATTER. Women EXIST. We will keep our word that means adult human female. You cannot have it. Men are Men.

reSee.it AI Summary
In a shocking incident at Wi Spa, a naked man entered the women's section where women and girls were undressed. Despite their complaints, California's gender ideology laws prevented the spa from maintaining a women-only space. The blame was unjustly placed on the women and even a 9-year-old girl, while the sex offender was defended by trans activists. Denial and threats followed, but thanks to police reports, the offender was eventually arrested. This disturbing incident highlights the need for better protection of women and girls in such spaces.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

They are trying to memory hole this and many people never heard of it. So here is a story about a sex offender and the trans activists who stood up for him. It started at a spa. A naked man walked into the women’s section where women and girls were naked.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

The women complained. Loudly. They were horrified. As anyone in their right mind would be. But thanks to the gender ideologues California has a law that says you can’t have a woman’s only space. It is illegal. https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/civil-code/civ-sect-51/

California Code, Civil Code - CIV Β§ 51 | FindLaw California Civil Code CIV CA CIVIL Section 51. Read the code on FindLaw codes.findlaw.com

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

If you want a giggle. Look at the civil code in California and see how they define the sex of a person. This is law folks. This utter gobbledygook is law.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

You’d think someone would realize that a naked grown man walking in on a women and girls was not cool. But no. They blamed the women. They blamed the little girl for seeing him. The man is a registered sex offender and they blamed the little girl.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

They called the 9 year old perverted for having eyes and seeing the sex offender. Yes. You have that right. They called the little girl perverted. Not the man who exposed himself to her. They blamed her.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Lest you are thinking right about now, but those are crazy twitter trolls. Let me assure you, this was mainstream. So sure are they that men can do anything they like, they stood up for the sex offender. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-07-06/editorial-transgender-spa-customers-have-the-same-rights-as-everyone-else

Editorial: Transgender spa customers have the same rights as everyone else Some might feel discomfited when transgender customers strip down in a clothing-optional spa. But always feeling comfortable isn't a civil right. latimes.com

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

The next bit of psyops was to try to deny the incident ever happened. Twitter was flooded with messages like these. And I mean flooded.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

When women and other concerned citizens showed up to protest the exposing of penises to little girls, men in black bloc and other activists came to threaten them. Yes. The women were threatened for objecting to sexual offenses.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Enough women filed police reports that the police were forced to investigate. The sex offender was eventually arrested. https://nypost.com/2021/09/02/charges-filed-against-sex-offender-in-wi-spa-casecharges-filed-against-sex-offender-in-notorious-wi-spa-incident/

Sex offending suspect claims transgender harassment in Wi Spa case Darren Agee Merager, who spoke exclusively The Post, denies the allegations and says that she is actually the victim of transphobic harassment. nypost.com

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

And that is the story of the #WiSpa You might not have heard of it. Most of us were shadowbanned at the time. Even calling the penis showing sex offender a man could get you banned. But we were here. And now The Terven will tell the world.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

The worst part about all this? The only reason this flasher was arrested was because he was a registered sex offender. Any other man can still flash kids to their hearts content. When and where will the next WiSpa occur? Will you tell the girls it’s their fault?

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Here is the Guardian calling anyone far right if they objected to a man flashing a child. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/jul/18/dozens-arrested-in-los-angeles-as-anti-trans-protest-outside-spa-turns-violent

Dozens arrested in Los Angeles as anti-trans protest outside spa turns violent Wi Spa, a Koreatown business with a trans-inclusive policy, has become the target of a rightwing media storm theguardian.com

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Here is the Guardian trying to pretend it never happened. So many people defending the sex offender. Where were the articles defending the little girl? Have you watched the video on this first post yet? No one stands up for that little girl. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/28/anti-trans-video-los-angeles-protest-wi-spa

β€˜A nightmare scenario’: how an anti-trans Instagram post led to violence in the streets Misinformation about a spa in Los Angeles was amplified by anti-trans and far-right groups across the globe, leading to abuse of trans women in LA theguardian.com

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

And here is Slate calling it a hoax too. We will not forget what they all did to those women and that little girl. We have the receipts. https://slate.com/human-interest/2021/07/wi-spa-la-transphobic-protest.html

Violence Over an Alleged Transphobic Hoax Shows the Danger of Underestimating Anti-Trans Hate Police reportedly suspect the viral L.A. Wi Spa video is fakeβ€”but it still got two people stabbed. slate.com

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

We will not forget all the people who stood with the sex offender. The poor little girl. It’s bad enough to experience what she did, but to have all these people standing against you? And they wonder why women don’t report. https://t.co/Jtb3yobTUv

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Wi Spa adjacent. Even I’m speechless reading this.

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

When the Wi Spa incident occurred women were being banned for daring to call him a man, but the activists could say anything they wanted. And they did. Old twitter was complicit in all of this getting out of hand. When only side can speak the zeitgeist gets wonky. https://t.co/oLt3kq96Qu

@babybeginner - Jennifer πŸŸ₯πŸ”΄πŸ§™β€β™€οΈπŸ¦‰πŸˆβ€β¬› πŸ¦–

Here is Judith Butler calling the women who complained Terfs and far right. This interview was scrubbed when they found out the man she was defending was a sex offender. We have the receipts. Were it not for his previous conviction, this would have been the story. https://t.co/lVszIOvX9x

View Full Interactive Feed