TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @banthebbc
@banthebbc - banthebbc π
[16 Oct 2014] - (Then) Rear Admiral John Kirby (now National Security Council coordinator spokesman) nailed on NATO expansionism by AP's Matt Lee. They've been poking the Russian bear with NATO for a very long time and they act surprised when he finally bites? https://t.co/Wdj7f2vVjA
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 explains that "revisionist Russia" refers to Russia's intentions resembling the Soviet Union's glory days. They discuss NATO's expansion eastward, stating it's a defensive move. Speaker 0 questions if NATO's actions are perceived as a threat by Russia due to proximity. Speaker 1 emphasizes NATO's defensive nature and denies hostile intentions. The conversation highlights differing perspectives on NATO's expansion and Russia's actions in Ukraine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What he meant by calling revisionist Russia?
Speaker 1: Revisionist Russia?
Speaker 0: Yeah. What what what does that mean?
Speaker 1: Well, the secretary?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Secretary Hagel.
Speaker 1: I think what he's referring to there is that, that there appears to be in their intentions and their motives, a call a calling back to the glory days of the Soviet Union.
Speaker 0: He also used the that phrase that its army, meaning Russia's army on NATO's doorstep. Why is that? Is it not logical to look at this and say the reason that the Russian army is on NATO the Russian army is at NATO's doorstep is because NATO has expanded rather than the Russians expanding? That in other words, NATO has moved closer to Russia rather than Russia moving closer to NATO. Is that not an accurate way to look at this?
Speaker 1: I think that's the way President Putin probably looks at it. It's certainly not the way that we look at it.
Speaker 0: You don't you don't think that NATO has expanded eastward toward Russia?
Speaker 1: MS. NATO has expanded. And the expansion has been a good thing for
Speaker 0: So the reason that the Russian army is at NATO's doorstep is not the fault of the Russian or not the it's not the Russian army that's done it. It's NATO has moved closer to
Speaker 1: moving
Speaker 0: Well, pretty
Speaker 1: sure it wasn't NATO who was ordering, you know, upwards of 15 battalion tactical groups to within 10 kilometers of the border with Ukraine. And I'm pretty sure it wasn't NATO who put little green men inside Ukraine to destabilize eastern states. I'm pretty
Speaker 0: sure that Ukraine is not a member of NATO. So unless that's changed
Speaker 1: It's not it's not changed. But I'm pretty sure the movement by Russia
Speaker 0: is Russia's just MS. If NATO has moved east, the reason that the Russian Army is closer or on NATO's doorstep is because NATO moved, not because MS.
Speaker 1: NATO is not an anti Russia alliance. NATO is a security alliance.
Speaker 0: For 50 years, it was an anti Soviet alliance. So do you not understand it Togo? Do you not understand how or can you not even see how the Russians will perceive it as a threat? And the fact that it keeps getting closer to their border while their troops I mean, the the places where their troops are, you say their troops are and may may have been in Ukraine and Georgia, are not made of them.
Speaker 1: I don't have I'm not gonna pretend to know what goes in President Putin's mind or Russian military commanders. I mean, I barely got a history degree at the University of South Florida. What I can tell you what I can tell you is that is that, NATO is a defensive alliance. It remains a defensive alliance.
Speaker 0: Fair enough. But it has moved east. Correct? I mean, that's just the fact.
Speaker 1: It has expanded. Absolutely.
Speaker 0: Exactly. But
Speaker 1: there's no reason for anybody to think the expansion is a hostile or threatening move. And we've been saying that throughout the last 15 years, man.
Speaker 0: You're you're moving closer to Russia. You're blaming the Russians for being close to NATO. No. No. No.
No. That's that's exactly what Hagel said.
Speaker 1: Blaming the Russians for violating the territorial integrity of Ukraine and destabilizing the security of
Speaker 0: Ukraine. Which is not a NATO. Which is not a NATO.
Speaker 1: I I I see Other countries
@banthebbc - banthebbc π
They hate us. (Weβve all saved this havenβt we?) π https://t.co/5PuEPdzVMn
@banthebbc - banthebbc
Next time you engage with a virtue signalling idiot online this is what you are really dealing with
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks if anyone is willing to take in refugees, but most people decline due to lack of space or rental restrictions. One person says they would consider it if they had more room. Speaker 1 mentions having a small house and not being able to accommodate a refugee. Another person says they would be willing if they had the space. The conversation ends with Speaker 0 asking where the refugees should go since no one is able to take them in.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just wondering if you'd like to go down on a list saying you're willing to take the refugees into your home. Of course not. Only problem is I rent. Just because you've got that refugee as well, Nick.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm just
Speaker 0: the people that's willing to actually, adopt a refugee and take them into your home.
Speaker 1: Well, if I had any space, I
Speaker 0: would yes.
Speaker 1: It would
Speaker 0: wouldn't be Alright. And Will it accept the refugee? Like, adopt 1 into your home? Rentals. Yeah.
Yeah. You can't do it? Yeah. Yeah. Someone else's job?
Yeah. Yeah. Alright. Thank you. Is she willing to adopt a refugee and take them into your home?
Speaker 1: No. I'm sorry. I can't.
Speaker 0: You can't take 1? No.
Speaker 1: I don't have I don't have I don't I don't have a
Speaker 0: Don't have the space.
Speaker 1: Okay. Do you have
Speaker 0: a refugee stay at your house?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I don't mind.
Speaker 0: You got on the list?
Speaker 1: Oh, my. Yeah. I can't take any little think. Oh, wait. I can't because small house is a little small
Speaker 0: and Amazing. That's what I was waiting for. Thank you, darling. Would you be willing to have a refugee on your own? Yes.
If I had room. If you had room. It's funny that. Yeah. Now will you go on my list of people that's willing to adopt a refugee?
No.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
Speaker 0: No. Thank you. Excuse me. Would you be willing to adopt a refugee into your home? No.
No. Would you adopt a refugee into your home? No. Thank you. No?
So where should we put them then? Sorry? Where should we put them? Sorry. Sorry.
I'm gonna I probably missed it. Don't worry about it. Don't worry about it. Should you be willing to go on the list of people that's willing to adopt a refugee into their home? But I'm in a tenant's flat, 1 bed.
Okay. Adopt a refugee? I would be willing. Yeah. If I had the space.
If you had the space. Yeah. So where should we put them then? Actually, it's it then. Yeah.
@banthebbc - banthebbc
#ClimateScam They've recalibrated the temperature scale bands to bring in 'red' at 20 degrees C. (20+ degrees isn't hot) You used to only see red scale start at 40... What an obvious sleight of hand to feed the panic. Someone is being paid a lot of money to do this.
