TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @beinlibertarian
@beinlibertarian - Being Libertarian
It’s a shame it has taken so long for this conversation to get any attention. Glad @RobertKennedyJr is going to be moving forward to investigate this… finally. https://t.co/JCd9x6WNdV
Video Transcript AI Summary
Why did the number of vaccines triple after 1989? Are all of them necessary, or is it about profit? The US gives twice as many shots as other Western countries. Parents should educate themselves, and decide what is absolutely necessary. Do we need the chicken pox vaccine, or the hepatitis B shot on the second day of life?
We can't assume public health officials always have our best interests at heart. Parents need to make educated decisions and look at the information. Space out vaccines, delay them, and clean out the toxins.
Why wouldn't doctors want to learn more about preventing disease? The AAP and medical schools are financed by drug companies, and vaccines are the fastest-growing part of the pharmaceutical industry, a 13 billion dollar business. We're asking them to take a loss for the good of our children, which is a tough sell.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. No. What happened in 1990? There was no plague that was killing children that we had a triple the amount of vaccines.
Speaker 1: What happened after 1989? And that's Why do they triple born to 26 more vaccines. Agreed. Are all of them absolutely necessary? They wanna make money.
Speaker 0: Of course.
Speaker 1: It's twice as many as anywhere else in in 30 countries in the Western world. We give twice as many shots as any of those countries. Why is that? What what are you against? Don't vaccinate for this, but vaccinate for that?
Yes. I think we have to choose which is absolutely necessary.
Speaker 0: You should you should educate yourself. We wanna empower parents to educate themselves. Do we need to have the chicken pox? Do we need the hepatitis b shot on the second day of life?
Speaker 1: I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with our our public health any longer have our best interest at heart all the time. Excellent. Parents have to take have to make their own decisions, educated decisions. They have to look at the information.
Speaker 0: Space out the vaccines. Delay them till after one. Clean out the toxins that are in them. We don't need that many.
Speaker 1: Why would a doctor not want to know more about something that could save that could save a life or prevent a disease? I don't I don't understand. I, the AAP is financed by the drug companies. Medical schools are financed by the drug companies. This is a huge business.
Vaccines are the largest growing division of the pharmaceutical industry. $13,000,000,000
Speaker 0: They control medical schools.
Speaker 1: What we are asking is for them to take a loss for the good of our children. That's a tough sell in a boardroom.
@beinlibertarian - Being Libertarian
Judge Joe Brown calls Kamala a piece of 💩 This rant went way longer than I thought it would. 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/cydNejJOfM
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala Harris is criticized for being lazy and ineffective in her previous roles, including as district attorney and senator. She is accused of hiding evidence and lacking competence. The speaker questions her ability to handle international diplomacy and immigration issues, highlighting concerns about health risks and criminal activities associated with undocumented immigrants. Harris is portrayed as incoherent and incompetent, with doubts about her suitability for her current position.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gotta ask you about Kamala Harris. How you feel about her? She's a piece of shit. I was out in California for 15 years doing my show when she was at a peak, and she had a reputation amongst the trial lawyers of being lazy. She just hiked her skirt up and tried to flirt.
She wasn't that good in the courtroom, if not pretty bad in the courtroom. Willie Brown made the in initial contacts and arrangements so she could get elected as district attorney for San Francisco. She didn't do a very good job. She had a reputation for giving out the stiffest sentences in the United States of America for simple possession of marijuana in San Francisco for God's sakes, but it was only to young black men. After that, they got together and got our finance and got everything organized and made the connections for her, and she got elected to US senator.
And that brings up the other thing where the Supreme Court of California ordered her to produce the evidence that was exculpating to somebody sitting up on death row that she had hidden. They did that over and over and over again with her hiding this evidence. She's 60 years old, and I think listening to her words solid and the way she talks, You see, today is going to be tomorrow. So since it's gonna be tomorrow, today, we have tomorrow, which is why we are now. Like, what did you say?
They have something in mind, but they cannot cognate getting all the way through it, which is why she's famous for this word salad garbage, and she doesn't make a bit of sense. I think and my major at UCLA was political science. My analysis was is they picked the weakest somebody they could as a figurehead, somebody who had some apparent minority status, which she does not. And then you get somebody that's easy to control because she's lazy, because she is becoming incoherent, and because she's always tried to do the casting couch to get where she wants. Now the problem is is that'll get somebody to a certain level quickly, but you can't get past that level if you don't have competence and talent.
She was everybody's favorite Hindu Indian prosecutor and attorney general and senator, and now she becomes black. So when you come into this situation here, Putin, you know, Russia, Ukraine, those are serious things. They have a lot of nukes. You've got Xi Jinping, and China's got one hell of a huge army, air force, nukes, computer systems, and so on. What is your experience in international diplomacy?
You got made the representative of the country to handle the foreign affairs. You failed so badly they yanked you out when you were actually the boss in charge, the borders are. You just complete abject failure to that. Your only appearance down there was to sit in a chair in the desert while they interviewed you, trying to be cute, flashing your pearls, you know, and you didn't do your job. So when you're talking now about you wanna legitimize 20,000,000 aliens who've come in here and see that they get fast tracked so they can vote and become part of the whole process, what are you doing?
Whose jobs are you taking away? What about the people that actually lined up to go through the roof? You know, I wanna become a citizen, so I take the courses. See, nobody's checking. They've got a outbreak of hepatitis.
They got an outbreak of measles. HIV is ramped up. They've got all kinds of things. They've got problems with, strains of tuberculosis that have no cure. So people, before they come down with it, you have to put them on prophylactics for the rest of their life so they don't get a fatal illness that nobody can cure.
So nobody is running the medical test. Nobody is checking to see what penitentiary they got out of. And something that is pretty real is a movie. You remember Al Pacino and Scarface? They dumped all their penitentiaries, and they're over here.
You got all of these Latino gangs that have now infiltrated. You've got Ukraine. You've got Gaza. You've got people that hate the fact that they don't have technology to shoot down a b one b bomber. So what did they do?
They just walk across the damn border. Nobody's checking them. That was your job. Did you do it? Did you handle it?
No. But you see, I did this because I did what I did, and that's what I did, which is because that's why I did it. What the hell did you just say?
@beinlibertarian - Being Libertarian
Kamala says mandatory gun confiscation is "a great idea" Also… “ if Congress doesn’t act within the first hundred days of my administration, i will take executive action https://t.co/WJIroAnCuD
Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe adding to our offensive agenda is a great idea, but we have had great ideas for decades. The issue is that congress lacks the courage to act. My agenda includes pushing congress to act, and if they don't in the first 100 days, I will take executive action. We need action.
Translation: I support expanding our offensive agenda, but congress has been hesitant to act on great ideas for years. If they don't act in the first 100 days, I will take executive action to move forward. Action is necessary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Adding to your offensive agenda? Yeah. I think it's a great idea. But, I mean, listen. I I don't think we lack for great ideas.
As I've said many times, we've been having great ideas for decades. The problem is that congress does not have the courage to act. And that is why, from the beginning, I have said my agenda includes attempting to get congress to act. But if they don't within the 1st 100 days of my administration, I'm gonna take executive action. Because what we need is action.
@beinlibertarian - Being Libertarian
If Tucker Carlson interviews Putin how many years will it take for people to analyze what he’s saying in a term that’s even slightly more complex than “good guys vs bad guys?” https://t.co/kOQi55LD5z
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Bush administration accuses President Hussein of deceiving the world about his weapons of mass destruction. A new UN resolution has been proposed, which, if passed, would authorize war due to his failure to prove disarmament. When asked about the new resolution, Speaker 1 maintains their position that they have not pursued any weapons of mass destruction and questions the need for issuing new resolutions. They emphasize that their stance remains unchanged and they prioritize their independence and dignity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Bush administration says president Hussein is just trying to fool the world one more time about his missiles and his weapons of mass destruction. And he faces a new UN resolution accusing him of failing to prove he has disarmed. A resolution which, if passed, would in effect Authorize war. Will the new proposed United Nations resolution, the one that's just out this week. Will this make any difference at all in your position?
Speaker 1: The basic position, there is no change. We have not pursued any weapons of mass destruction. So what do they want to issue new resolutions about now?
Speaker 0: So basically, no change in your position?
Speaker 1: The basic stand of our position is clear. We do not compromise our independence. For our dignity
@beinlibertarian - Being Libertarian
Real environmentalists help the environment