TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @bennyjohnson
reSee.it AI Summary
I see she says she never met Jeffrey Epstein, but emails imply otherwise: "Hillary Clinton is much prettier in person." "meetings with Hillary are not easily discreet. when?" "I know you are close with hillary... I'll fuckin kill you." "I would like to invite you to attend a very intimate fundraising event with Hillary Clinton."
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Hillary says she never met Jeffrey Epstein. But Emails with Jeffrey Epstein say that's not true: “Hillary Clinton is much prettier in person.” “meetings with Hillary are not easily discreet. when?” “I know you are close with hillary, but if she gets the nomination and you vote for her, I'll fuckin kill you.” “I would like to invite you to attend a very intimate fundraising event with Hillary Clinton”
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Yep.
@LibertyValkyrie - Heatherheather007
@bennyjohnson Why does Los Angeles County, population of 9M need 1823% more hospice clinics than both FLORIDA & NEW YORK combined (who have over 40M between both)? https://t.co/Lhj3AqZIrJ
reSee.it AI Summary
I reviewed the claim that Ilhan Omar lists a California winery, eStCru LLC, on her disclosures. It’s said to be valued at $15k in 2023 and $5 million in 2024, yet the winery allegedly doesn’t exist—no phone, no physical site, social media down, a weak site, no wine. It adds that Omar’s third husband, Tim Mynett, was sued by investors for fraud tied to this fake winery, with a Minnesota AG connection and a call for investigation.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨How did Ilhan Omar make millions from a 100% fake winery? This is insane. We investigated. Check this out… Illhan Omar lists a California winery on her financial disclosures. You can see them below. The winery name is ‘eStCru LLC.’ In 2023 it was valued at $15k. In 2024 it was valued at $5 Million (!!!) This must be a very successful winery to grow that much in value over one year. Except… the winery does not even exist: - No phone line - No physical winery - Social media gone dark - A barely functional ‘website’ - No wine lol What is this?! It gets worse: Omar’s third husband, Tim Mynett, has been accused of defrauding investors through this FAKE winery. He was sued by the investors for millions because it’s all fraudulent. This is on brand. Minnesota AG Keith Ellison previously worked with Mynett, the same AG who has REFUSED to investigate widespread Somali fraud. How does a nonexistent winery jump from $15k to $5 million in one year when the company is a ghost? How can Omar claim this fake company provides her millions in assets? Seems like a cover. Ironically, one of the wine labels they made was literally called ‘The Devil‘s Lie’ The Trump administration and Republicans in Congress MUST investigate this fraud further.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker analyzes Ilhan Omar’s official financial disclosures and advances a narrative that Est Crew LLC (referred to as Est Crew Winery), a Santa Rosa, California winery linked to Omar, is fraudulent and morally problematic. They first cite the 2023 congressional financial disclosure showing Est Crew Winery valued at $15,000, with Omar hardly earning income from it. They then cite the 2024 filing showing the same company valued at $5,000,000, claiming Omar’s income is now sufficient to pay rent and labeling the growth as “incredible” and suspect.
The speaker then examines the winery’s public presence to support the claim it is real. They reference Estrero’s social media pages (Facebook and Instagram) with last posts in 2023 and no presence on X (Twitter), suggesting a lack of ongoing activity. They check the official website, which describes Est Crew as “winemakers and memory curators” with a brand portfolio led by unnamed individuals, but note there are no apparent wine sales or activities listed. They visit Google Street View of the winery location and report an empty parking lot, arguing the business is not operational or properly named.
Attempts to contact the winery are described: calling the phone number on the webpage results in a busy signal after multiple tries.
The speaker then asserts the winery is fake, citing a New York Post claim that Ilhan Omar’s wealth “skyrocketed” from being “one of the poorest members of Congress” to “one of the richest,” with amounts suggesting the winery is fraudulent. They state a lawsuit accusing Tim Minette, Omar’s “third husband, no relation,” of swindling investors and defrauding them, with a connection noted to Keith Ellison (Minnesota’s attorney general who “used to work for him”) and a suggestion that Ellison has not investigated Somali fraud.
The speaker concludes that the winery “is not worth $5,000,000” and “doesn’t even exist,” describing the company as fraudulent and demanding investigation. They label the entire enterprise as a lie, though state that it is not a lie for Omar in terms of her financial disclosures, which allegedly list substantial income and net worth tied to this fake winery. The closing phrase refers to the claim that the winery is “the devil’s lie.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just investigated Ilhan Omar's official financial disclosures, and what I found was so dark and criminal, I don't know how she gets out of this without going to jail. Have a look at this. Here's Ilhan Omar's financial disclosure from the congressional record year 2023. I wanna bring your attention to this company right down here, Est Crew LLC. This is a winery in Santa Rosa, California.
It's not doing that well. The total value of the winery is listed at $15,000, and Ilhan Omar's barely making any money off of it at all, hardly enough to pay a parking ticket. Okay. That's fine. Nothing really mysterious there.
Businesses fail all the time. But go ahead and look at her filing for 2024 and you'll find that Est Crew Winery, the same company in the same location is now worth $5,000,000. That's incredible. Up from 15,000. And now Ilhan Omar is making enough to pay rent.
So this must be one of the most successful companies ever. Let's go ahead and check-in on this, winery. You know, maybe we could, maybe we could buy some wine. I like wine. Why not?
Let's let's see if we can buy some Estrero winery. Here's Estrero's social media Facebook page. You'll see here that the last post, oh, no, was in 2023. Wasn't this the year that they were supposed to, you know, go really big and make Ilhan Omar millions of dollars? Same thing on their Instagram, and they don't have an x.
So let's go ahead and check their official website. What is Est Crew? We are winemakers and memory curators. Okay? West Est Crew Winery, has a bunch of brands that's led by these people, creators of eye catching labels.
So, I'm sure I can go and get some of their wine, right? Well, they don't have any activities here. So maybe I could just go to their location and buy some of their wines or maybe give them a call. Let's try and go to their location here. Here.
This is the Google Street View of Est Crew Winery. And what you'll find here is an empty parking lot. It doesn't actually look like an operational business. Certainly isn't the same name. So, okay, let's go ahead and give them a call.
See if maybe they pick up. Let's go ahead and call the number on the web page. Go ahead and give them a call and find out. Oh, no. User busy.
Let's try okay. Well, I've done this, like, 20 times today. Oh, okay. So that so that didn't work. Is there any wine in this wine company?
Is there anything about wine? Because I see, like, stuff about events, but, like, what is this exactly? It it don't aren't you supposed to sell wine at your wine company? Where are your wines? Oh, there are no wines.
You wanna know why? Because this is a fake company. Rep. Ilhan Omar's husband accused of swindling investors in their California winery. They stole millions from cannabis growers.
You can see here, here's the lawsuit right here saying that Tim Minette is Ilhan Omar's third husband, no relation, swindled his investors and defrauded them. How did Minette get this, relationship? Well, the current attorney general of Minnesota, Keith Ellison, used to work for him. Isn't that curious? Keith Ellison, same guy who refuses to look into any of the Somali fraud.
So this company was sued for being a fraudulent company. And the New York Post says the exact same thing as the house is now probing the mystery of Ilhan Omar's skyrocketing wealth. They said that Ilhan Omar went from being one of the most one of the poorest members of Congress and worth negative $65,000 to being one of the richest worth 30,000,000. Here's a rare photo of one of their wines that they allegedly made, the devil's lie, but the entire company is actually a lie. It's not a lie to Ilhan Omar though because she's able to list an enormous amount of her income and enormous amount of her net worth to this fake winery.
This winery is not worth $5,000,000. The winery doesn't even exist. It's it's fake. It's fraudulent. They need to investigate this right now.
This is a lie. And maybe, just maybe, it's the devil's lie.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting that Gavin Newsom’s California gave tens of millions in taxpayer dollars to a contractor to shelter 600+ homeless people—only to learn the contractor took $23 million for himself. What did he spend your money on? A mansion, a $125,000 Land Rover, a vacation home in Greece, multiple luxury vacations, designer clothes, and private schools. LA’s US Attorney says 12 other cases are under investigation. More to come.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Gavin Newsom’s California Gave Tens of MILLIONS In Taxpayer Dollars To A ‘Contractor’ To Shelter 600+ Homeless People… Turns out, he was taking the money for himself. $23 million to be exact. Shocker. What did he spend your money on? - A mansion - A $125,000 Land Rover - A Vacation home in Greece. - Multiple Luxury vacations - Designer clothes - Private schools LA’s US Attorney Office says 12 other similar cases are under investigation. Insane @MattFinnFNC There is inconceivable rot under Gavin Newsom. This is just a glimpse. Our investigation will blow your mind.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Alexander Suker, 42, was contracted with the city and county of Los Angeles to house and feed up to 600 homeless people, but was accused of misusing tens of millions of dollars to live a luxurious life. Exclusive Fox video shows the federal agents’ early-morning bust at the LA mansion. Suker was arrested, and his $125,000 Land Rover was seized by law enforcement. The feds say Suker defrauded the city and county of LA out of $23,000,000 for not only his mansion and car, but a second home in Greece, luxury vacations, designer clothes, and private schools.
Speaker 1: He was living the high life while the people suffering, homeless on the streets with no shelter, no food. They're living out in the streets. People are literally dying, and this guy is out vacationing, buying homes, buying Range Rovers, and going shopping.
Speaker 0: Prosecutors say Suker was supposed to provide three nutritional meals a day to the homeless, but during one inspection, Suker only had canned beans and ramen noodles on hand. The feds say Suker lied about various aspects of abundant blessings, including fake vendors, facilities and the homeless actually getting meals. The US Attorney's Office in LA says they are actively investigating at least 12 other similar fraud cases here in California. First Assistant US Attorney Bill Asele says there's a tremendous amount of fraud in this state and that today's bust of one man who misused $23,000,000 alone may show how little oversight there is.
Speaker 1: California was pushing this money out quickly. A lot of money went out the door, with frankly very little vetting, very little checks and balances, and, he's one of the individuals that got it.
Speaker 0: The suspect is scheduled to make his first appearance later today. He faces up to twenty years if convicted on a federal case. The local district attorney is also planning on prosecuting. Sean.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Say this man was contracted with the city and county of Los Angeles to house and feed up to 600 homeless people, but instead he was misusing tens of millions of dollars to live a luxurious life. Exclusive Fox video shows the Fed's early morning bust here at the LA Mansion. 42 year old Alexander Suker was arrested. Suker's $125,000 Land Rover was also seized by law enforcement. The Fed say Suker defrauded the city and county of LA out of 23,000,000 in taxpayer dollars for not only his mansion and car, but a second home in Greece, luxury vacations, designer clothes, and private schools.
Speaker 1: He was living the high life while the people suffering, homeless on the streets with no shelter, no food. They're living out in the streets. People are literally dying, and this guy is out vacationing, buying homes, buying Range Rovers, and going shopping.
Speaker 0: Prosecutors say Suker was supposed to provide three nutritional meals a day to the homeless, but during one inspection, Suker only had canned beans and ramen noodles on hand. The Fed say Luker lied about various aspects of abundant blessings, including fake vendors, facilities and the homeless actually getting meals. The US Attorney's office in LA says they are actively investigating at least 12 other similar fraud cases here in California. First Assistant US attorney Bill Asele says there's a tremendous amount of fraud in this state and that today's bust of one man who misused $23,000,000 alone may show how little oversight there is.
Speaker 1: California was pushing this money out quickly. A lot of money went out the door, with frankly very little vetting, very little checks and balances, and, he's one of the individuals that got it.
Speaker 0: The suspect is scheduled to make his first appearance later today. He faces up to twenty years if convicted on a federal case. The local district attorney is also planning on prosecuting. Sean.
reSee.it AI Summary
There are 26 registered voters at this toilet in California. I’m not kidding; I have the voter records. The site is a stinky port-a-john in an empty parking lot—no homes, no mailboxes. Yet 26 ‘people’ are casting ballots here. This is why California needs Voter ID—NOW.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
There are 26 registered voters at this toilet in California. I’m not kidding. I have the voter records. See for yourself. The only thing here is a stinky port-a john inside an empty parking lot. No homes. No mailboxes. Yet TWENTY SIX ‘people’ are casting ballots here. Straight-up voter fraud out in the open. This just a glimpse of what’s happening under Gavin Newsom. This is why California desperately needs Voter ID — NOW
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
BREAKING: San Francisco quietly rolls out $5 million-per-person reparations for Black residents while in a $1 billion deficit. https://t.co/mz0Nv1NMih
Video Transcript AI Summary
The New York Post reports that the city plans $5,000,000 in payments to eligible black residents, but it cannot sign the checks because it is facing a $1,000,000,000 deficit, requiring creative accounting. In other money news, it says, “Homebuyers can usher in 2026 with a” (the sentence is incomplete in the transcript).
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: $5,000,000 payments to eligible black residents. However, paying for it may take some creative accounting. As the New York Post reports, the city's admitting it can't sign the checks as it's facing a $1,000,000,000 deficit. Some more news on the money front. Homebuyers can usher in 2026 with a
reSee.it AI Summary
I state that medical fraud is a multibillion-dollar industry in Minnesota and ask for answers about Rep. Melissa Hortman’s murder. Hortman allegedly was the only Democrat to vote against healthcare for illegals, and she and her husband were killed soon after. The killer was allegedly appointed by Tim Walz; his wife worked for Walz; he claimed Walz ordered the murder in a confession and named Walz in arraignment; he had “No Kings” flyers. Has there been an investigation? Dark things, man.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Now that we're all aware that medical fraud is a multi-billion dollar industry in Minnesota, can we get some answers about Rep. Melissa Hortman's murder? Melissa Hortman is the only Democrat to vote against healthcare for illegals. She killed the bill. Hortman and her husband were murdered soon after this vote. Her killer was appointed by Tim Walz. The killer's wife worked for Tim Walz. The killer said Tim Walz ordered the murder in his confession letter. The killer named Tim Walz multiple times in his arraignment. Her killer had 'No Kings' flyers in his car. The guy clearly had a screw loose - but has anyone asked Tim Walz a question about this connection on the record? Has there been an investigation? Dark things are happening in Minnesota, man.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Minnesota lawmakers faced a painful political moment as votes on a budget deal forced them to confront provisions many found objectionable. In the House, DFL speaker emerita Melissa Hortman was the lone DFL lawmaker to cast a vote to cut Minnesota care access for undocumented immigrants. She described the vote as taken with a heavy heart and said, "I did what leaders do. I stepped up and I got the job done for the people of Minnesota." The bill, however, was deeply unpopular within the DFL caucus. Members repeatedly expressed frustration that the measure was part of a compromise designed to secure the necessary GOP votes to pass the rest of the state budget. Hortman acknowledged the impact of her decision, stating, "We're tremendously disappointed and gut wrenched at this decision, at this compromise that compromises our communities that are most vulnerable." She also admitted the consequences of her vote on her relationships within her caucus, noting, "They're right to be mad at me. I think some of them are pretty angry. I think that their job was to make folks who voted for that bill feel like crap, and I think that they succeeded."
In the Senate, a parallel scenario unfolded. Senate Majority Leader Erin Murphy felt compelled to vote for a bill she did not agree with in order to uphold the integrity of the agreed compromise. She described the moment as painful, saying, "This one hurt. This one is a wound because of its reason. My colleagues across the aisle set this as their number one priority." The decision to vote for the measure raised concerns about possible rifts within the DFL caucus, but support came from some colleagues who argued in her defense. Senator John Marty stepped forward to defend Murphy, saying, "As a member of the caucus Yes, sir. She clearly was fighting against that every step of the way. In negotiations, if we wanted a budget, we had to agree to that. She agreed to put up one vote for us because of that."
Reporting from Saint Paul, Quinn Gorham covered the developments and the emotional toll of the votes on lawmakers as the session moved forward.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I know that people will be hurt by that vote and I'm we worked very hard to try to get a budget deal that wouldn't include that provision.
Speaker 1: DFL speaker emerita, Melissa Hortman, emotional following the house's adjournment from a special session Monday. Hortman was the lone DFL lawmaker to cast a vote to cut Minnesota care access for undocumented immigrants. It's a move she made with a heavy heart.
Speaker 0: I did what leaders do. I stepped up and I got the job done for the people of Minnesota.
Speaker 1: The bill was deeply unpopular with members of the DFL caucus. Members have repeatedly expressed frustration that the bill was part of a compromise, one that would ensure the necessary GOP votes to pass the rest of the state budget.
Speaker 0: We are tremendously disappointed and and gut wrenched at this decision, at this compromise that compromises our communities that are most vulnerable. It's a great time.
Speaker 1: Voortman knows she let down her own caucus members with the vote.
Speaker 0: They're right to be mad at me. I think some of them are pretty pretty angry. I think that their job was to make folks who voted for that bill feel like crap, and I think that they succeeded.
Speaker 1: Over in the senate, a similar situation unfolded. Senate majority leader Erin Murphy forced to vote for a bill she too disagreed with to uphold the integrity of their compromise.
Speaker 2: This one hurt. This one is a wound because of its reason. My colleagues across the aisle set this as their number one priority.
Speaker 1: Asked whether the move would drive a wedge between her and the rest of her caucus, her DFL colleague, senator John Marty, quickly stepped to her defense.
Speaker 3: As a member of the caucus Yes, sir. She clearly was fighting against that every step of the way. In negotiations, if we wanted a budget, we had to agree to that. She agreed to put up one vote for us because of that.
Speaker 1: Reporting in Saint Paul, I'm Quinn Gorham.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m told that footage of pipe bombs at the RNC and DNC on January 6th no longer exists. There’s January 5th video, but no one preserved January 6th. None of the camera angles behind the RNC or DNC exist today. This has inhibited our investigation as we scour through Capitol police footage.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
J6 Subcommittee Chair Says ALL Footage of Pipe Bombs Being Planted at RNC and DNC Was DELETED: LOUDERMILK: "As we go and looking for video on January 6th to see did anybody go back to these locations, that footage doesn't exist anymore. We have January 5th video, but we were told no one preserved January 6th." "None of the camera angles behind the RNC or DNC exists today. This has inhibited our investigation and is something new we've come across. We are scowering through all Capitol police footage."
Video Transcript AI Summary
There were multiple improbable factors that would have had to align for these bombs to be discovered at the same time on a sidewalk, prompting questions about a broader conspiracy and how such a scenario could unfold. The speakers emphasize that while they want to avoid a conspiracy path, there are many questions still open, including the handling of video footage.
Regarding video records, one speaker notes that they want to review January 6 video to see if anyone returned to the locations, but that video apparently does not exist anymore. They do have January 5 video, but have been told that no one preserved January 6. This raises eyebrows as they consider whether the devices were placed by an inexperienced person who was trying to set them down quickly or whether the devices were left to be found.
Mrs. Younger’s account is highlighted: she walked out her back door and did not see anything earlier in the morning, but saw the devices later, which would give a reason to believe she would have noticed them if they had been there in the morning. This observation is part of why they want to talk to her.
One speaker is blown away by a point: according to the FBI, the FBI’s internal data indicate 39,000 videos showing the hoodie-clad pipe bomber—referred to as the C. Virkel bomber—movements that night, from various camera angles. Washington, DC, Capitol Hill is described as among the most surveilled areas in the world. Yet there is a claim that there is no footage from January 6 of the actual areas a person would have had to travel to place the pipe bombs.
The other speaker confirms that there are cameras along some Capitol Police lines that show walking paths, including footage from Capitol Police cameras, but the angles that would show positions behind the RNC and behind the DNC do not exist today, at least not in a way that captures the relevant movements. This absence has limited the investigation into the theory that the devices could have been placed earlier and then moved or re-placed. They are now going back through Capitol Police footage, including from the Fairchild Building near the DNC, which has provided the most evidence so far. The team is reviewing hours from about 8 PM on May 5 to 1 PM on January 6 to determine whether anyone else passed by, whether there was any suspicious activity, and whether the devices were moved again.
The investigators are evaluating step-by-step explanations for these anomalies, considering whether the Secret Service dog failed to detect one device or whether Mrs. Younger missed the other, whether the devices were not present at that time, or whether weather and other factors affected detections. They acknowledge that with so many circumstances, some “smoke” might indicate “fire.” They hope the FBI is reviewing cell phone data to determine if the suspected bomber returned or if a co-conspirator was involved in setting timers or re-placing devices. The transcript ends with an acknowledgment of ongoing investigation scope and questions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are so many concurrent miracles that would have had to happen for these bombs to have been discovered at the same time sitting in the middle of the sidewalk. You know? What I mean, where does that lead you? I I guess you don't know yet, but.
Speaker 1: Well,
Speaker 0: That don't implies a much broader conspiracy, doesn't it?
Speaker 1: Well, it does. And that's the thing that we try to avoid is just going down a conspiracy path, but taking a theory and trying to prove it wrong. There's still so many questions regarding this because one of the things that has raised our eyebrows is as we go and we look for video on January 6 because we want a remote in video on January 6 to see did anybody go back to these locations? Unfortunately, that video apparently doesn't exist anymore. We do have the January 5 video, but we've been told that no one ever preserved January 6.
So that does raise our eyebrows a bit, but you're right. Both devices were placed either you know, the person doing the pipe bomb wasn't very experienced. He was just trying to get them down and go or they were left to be found. And so it is pretty amazing. And, you know, Mrs.
Younger said she walked out her back door. It wasn't there earlier in the morning, but she saw it later and it would give a reason to believe that she would have noticed it if it was there in the morning. So that's one of the reasons we do wanna talk to her.
Speaker 0: Hey, you just blew my mind here. I'm sorry. I if you if you don't mind staying just a few more minutes. Like Sure. You just told me that so according to the FBI, according to the internals at the FBI, there are 39,000 different visual elements showing the hoodie guy, right?
Pipe bomber. We call him the C. Virkel bomber. Showing this guy because it's thick Coke bottle glasses, right? You know, dorky, spectrumy kid from the suburbs.
There's 39,000 videos showing his movements that night from different camera angles. Washington, DC, Capitol Hill, in particular, is the most surveilled area arguably in the world. There are so many cameras up there.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: And you're telling me that there are no there's no footage from January 6 of the actual areas where you would have to travel to place these pipe bombs.
Speaker 1: No, we do have cameras along some of these, any Capitol police cameras that we have that show some of the walking paths, those do exist, but none of the camera angles like behind the RNC, behind the DNC that we know of that exist today, where this person would have been had the closest angles. And so that has inhibited our investigation into this theory of maybe they were placed back out again. And this is something new that we've just come across. So we're starting to scour through all the Capitol Police cameras because there is a Capitol Police building over by the DNC. It's called the Fairchild Building and they do have cameras there.
And that's been some of the cameras that have given us most of the evidence. So our team is going back through and it takes a while when you look at how many cameras there are and you're looking for hours of video because we're talking about this device was put out at around 8PM on the fifth. Now we've got to look from 8PM all the way to 1PM on the sixth to see did anyone else go by there? Was there any other traffic, any suspicious activity going on there? That takes a while.
But again, these are theories that we're trying to go through step by step, box by box and try to come up with what is a reasonable explanation as to how the secret service dog didn't hit on the one device, Mrs. Younger didn't see the other device. It's just a logical conclusion is possibly they weren't there at that time but then you have to ask if they weren't, why were they picked up? Why were they placed again? And so it could come out that she just missed it and that the dog did hit on it and the handler wasn't paying attention but it did make several passes or weather condition, whatever.
But when you have that many circumstances, generally where there's smoke, there's some level of fire. So we have to track this down. And another thing that I hope that's happening and I believe they're doing this is the FBI looking at his cell phone data to see if he came back again. If he didn't, then did he have somebody he was working with? Was there a co conspirator that came in and actually either set the timers or picked up the devices and put them back out.
Speaker 0: We have so many
reSee.it AI Summary
I state that the author claims Ilhan Omar married her brother to prove Somali inbreeding, then paints Somalia with broad stereotypes—illiteracy, piracy, Sharia, tribal warfare—arguing Somalis are incompatible with Western civilization and accusing politicians of importing Somalis for fraud. The tone is accusatory and sweeping, blaming an entire group for crime and corruption.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Why did Illhan Omar marry her brother? Because in Somalia inbreeding is encouraged. It’s part of their culture: - Inbreeding rates of +60% - Child brides - Mass female genital mutilation - 58% of the population is illiterate - Economy based on piracy and fraud - Sharia Law and bloody tribal warfare Somalian culture is incompatible with western civilization. So why do we bring any Somalians to America? No politician has ever tried to make the case that Somali migration is good for America because of course it is not. But our political class bring Somalis to America by the hundreds of thousands. Why? Because they have a culture of fraud. That’s why…
Video Transcript AI Summary
Omar and Benny discuss Somali immigration to the United States, arguing that Somalia’s culture is incompatible with Western civilization. They claim Ilhan Omar’s marriage to her brother is emblematic of broader concerns, asserting that in Somalia up to 50% of tribes are inbred through first- and second-cousin marriages and that the country has high rates of child brides, female genital mutilation, polygamy, tribal warfare, fraud, and piracy. They question who decided that this culture should be brought to America and propose a test: “The people are the nation,” suggesting that if Somalia were a fifty-first state, people would not want to visit it. They reference Winooski, Vermont, where they say the Somali flag is being raised near the Canadian border, using this to illustrate perceived spread of Somali influence.
They criticize Democrats for saying no one is above the law but allegedly excluding illegal aliens, drug cartels, terrorists, felons, and “Somalians who are breaking the law.” Benny frames this as part of Somali culture described as a “failed state” where fraud and piracy persist. They explain a Food Fraud scheme during COVID: Minneapolis-area restaurants in Somali neighborhoods allegedly claimed to feed people while ghost meals were funded by the Meals Act of 2020, authored by Ilhan Omar. They claim Ilhan Omar created the vehicle for fraudulent mass funding and assert that many of the restaurants had connections to Omar, with people indicted for fraud being close allies who worked on her campaign, donated to her campaign, and benefited from the program, which allegedly involved millions of dollars and ties to her network. They state these funds were then donated to her campaign.
Omar and Benny assert that the vast majority of Somali immigrants in the country are on food stamps, are unemployed, and do not speak the language, presenting this as fact. They emphasize that they want to deal in facts and frame their discussion as concerned about assimilation and integration, while expressing a desire to support legal immigration. They debate whether there should be an assimilation program or limits on immigration, with Benny stating a belief that America is full and expressing support for net-zero immigration, referencing historical precedents like Calvin Coolidge’s 1920s approach to cooling off immigration to prevent national splintering. They reiterate the idea that the Minneapolis Somali community demonstrates a broader “Somali problem.”
The conversation closes with a farewell to Penny Johnson and an invitation to continue the discussion on an upcoming podcast.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Omar knew what was going on here and maybe profited off it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Rob. So let's take a step back and ask a question. Why do we import any Somalis to America? If you look at Somalia as a nation, you can plainly see that this country is not going to be compatible with Western civilization. Now you asked about Ilhan Omar marrying her brother.
That's horrifying. Being inbred is a very bad thing in western civilization. It's not what you want to do. There are horrible genetic results. It can really collapse your gene pool.
It's I mean, it's more immoral in our culture. But in Somalian culture, Rob, up to 50% of the tribes are inbred. That's first and second cousin marriages. The coefficient there is one of the highest rates of interfamily marriages in the world. Also, some of the highest rates of child brides in the world.
One of the highest rates of female genital mutilation on Earth is from Somalia. One of the highest rates of polygamy and tribal warfare and fraud and piracy all from Somalia, Rob. So you need to ask the question, wait a second. Who decided that this was a good culture to bring here? Here's my test, Rob.
My test is the people are the nation. So it's not like you're just bringing over a bunch of Americans. You're bringing over Somalia. So let's say you were to take Somalia as a place and make it a fifty first state. Would you wanna visit that state?
Is that a place you'd wanna go?
Speaker 0: I don't wanna visit Somalia. Yeah. It's like spring break Somalia. Would you do that now? This is a it's been a failed state since Bill Clinton, and people think this is exclusive to just Minnesota.
It's not. I I don't know if you've seen this, but this is Winooski, Vermont, which is like 25 miles outside Burlington, Vermont. It's like 25 miles from the Canada border. Here, they're raising the Somali flag. Again, this is not this is Winooski, Vermont.
Take a look. No sense to me. Benny, can I ask you? So Democrats love to say that no one's above the law, but they never mention illegal aliens, drug cartels, terrorists, felons, Somalians who are breaking the law. Why is that?
Speaker 1: Well, again, it is part of their culture. You have an entire failed state where the culture is fraud and piracy. Now here's how the food fraud worked because I think that people have lost just how simple this was. Restaurants in Somali neighborhoods in Minneapolis claimed they were feeding people during COVID. Those were ghost meals.
Those meals never happened. They were able to pocket all of the money through a program. Rob, where's that program come from? Well, it was called the Meals Act. It was passed in 2020.
Who was the author of that bill? Ilhan Omar. Ilhan Omar created the vehicle for the mass billions of dollars of fraud in the community, and it's not a coincidence that the vast majority of the restaurants had a connection to Ilhan Omar. The people who were now federally indicted for this fraud were close allies of Ilhan, worked on her campaign, donated to her campaign. That's how she gets $30,000,000.
She writes the program. Her friends benefit from it, and then they donate to her campaign, bags of cash. We know they were already funding Muslim terrorism back in Somalia the same way.
Speaker 0: It it's just it it's unbelievable. And I hope the administration you know, there the vast majority of Somali immigrants in this country right now, we looked this up today, Benny. They're on food stamps. Many are unemployed. Many don't speak the language.
And those are just facts. Again, we're gonna talk about facts. We're gonna deal in facts. Okay? We're not trying to be cruel or unkind to anybody.
We love immigrants. We love for them to be legal. But shouldn't there be and again, I've got about fifteen seconds, but some sort of assimilation program set up in this country for legal immigrants.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I'm gonna tell you, man, I think that America's full. I would like to see net zero immigration for the rest of my life. We did this in nineteen twenties when Calvin Coolidge said there's just too much. We need a cooling off period because the nation is splintering.
I think that's happening right now. The Somali problem in Minneapolis proves it.
Speaker 0: Penny Johnson, great to see you tonight. Enjoy the podcast. We'll do it again soon. Thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve reviewed the FBI findings: they traced a checking account and six credit cards to Brian Cole, used to buy pipe-bomb components—8 galvanized pipes, 14 end caps, 7 9-volt battery connectors, 3 white timers, 14-gauge red/black wire, steel wool, safety glasses, wire-stripping tools, sandpaper and a machinist’s file, 2 9-volt batteries, and alligator clips. Cell-site data shows his phone connected near the RNC/DNC towers seven times from 7:39 to 8:24 PM on Jan 5, 2021. He’s also linked to a 2017 Nissan Sentra flagged by a plate reader near South Capitol Street.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
BREAKING: Newly Released Affidavit Reveals How The FBI Identified The Suspected J6 Pipe Bomber Brian Cole. The FBI identified a checking account and six credit cards belonging to Cole that were used to purchase materials matching the components of a pipe bomb. - Eight 1” x 8” galvanized pipes from Home Depot northern Virginia - Fourteen end caps black and galvanized from Home Depot northern Virginia - Seven 9-volt battery connectors and clips from Micro Center northern Virginia - Three white kitchen timers from Walmart northern Virginia - 14-gauge red and black electrical wire from Home Depot and Lowe’s northern Virginia - Steel wool from Home Depot northern Virginia - Safety glasses July 2020 - Wire stripping tool and wire nuts November 2020 - Sandpaper and machinist’s file November 2020 - Two 9-volt batteries from Walmart northern Virginia January 2021 - Alligator clips from Home Depot northern Virginia January 2021 The FBI also obtained cell site records from towers within the vicinity of the RNC and DNC. It was revealed that Cole's cellphone connected with these towers seven different times between 7:39PM and 8:24PM on January 5th, 2021. Brian Cole is also registered to 2017 Nissan Sentra which was flagged by a license plate reader at the South Capitol Street exit just half a mile from where he was first spotted.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m tired of foreign obsessions—Israel, Ukraine, the next country. Americans struggle while flags for other nations rise and the American flag seems to disappear. Washington warned against foreign entanglements; meddling weakens us. It’s time to put America First and prioritize our country. Thanks again for having me on @piersmorgan.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Enough with foreign obsessions. I’m sick of it. We’re obsessed with Israel, Ukraine, and the next country, while Americans struggle, our nation crumbles, and our time, money, and energy are wasted. Flags go up for every other nation while the American flag disappears. George Washington warned us in his farewell address: avoid foreign entanglements. He understood that meddling in ancient conflicts destroys nations from within. Yet we ignore that wisdom while our own country rots, pretending we can solve everyone else’s problems. It’s time to put America First. Prioritize your own country, everything else comes second. Thanks again for having me on @piersmorgan
Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation centers on the persistent American fixation with Israel and foreign entanglements. Speaker 0 asks whether Trump and modern administrations, in general, have shown slavish support for Israel, noting a growing split on the conservative right between those who defend Israel unconditionally and those who are critical of the Israeli government’s strategy, particularly in the war with Hamas. Israel emerges as a common theme tying together this divide.
Speaker 1 expresses exhaustion with the Israel debate, describing it as a “hat game” that has swapped Israel for Ukraine as the focal point of international involvement. He questions why the country is obsessed with intervening in others’ affairs and references George Washington’s supposed warning against foreign entanglements, implying that foreign entanglements threaten the United States. He draws a contrast between Israel and Ukraine as long-standing blood feuds and questions the feasibility of “solving” these ancient conflicts from abroad.
Speaker 0 adds provocatively about blaming historical figures, briefly mentioning King George III, while continuing to frame the discussion around the heavy costs and distractions of foreign entanglements.
Speaker 1 further argues that these foreign concerns distract from addressing domestic problems. He uses a therapy-couch metaphor to suggest people project dissatisfaction about their country onto other nations rather than doing the hard work at home. He posits that people know the country is broken and that instead of tackling internal issues, they “project onto some other country,” labeling the preoccupation with Israel, Palestine, Hamas, Ukraine, Donetsk, Crimea, and similar topics as a form of self-critique or misdirection.
He predicts a continuing cycle of fixation, suggesting that Taiwan would be next, followed by other small nations like Papua New Guinea, as new obsessions for national attention and resources. He concludes by saying that people are sick of this pattern of constant foreign focus.
Overall, the exchange portrays a frustrated critique of America’s ongoing involvement in foreign conflicts, the shifting emphasis between Israel and Ukraine, and the belief that this preoccupation distracts from addressing domestic issues. The speakers emphasize a desire to end what they view as an endless cycle of overseas interventions and symbolic national debates.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Would you include Trump and the Trump administration and indeed every American administration in modern times, the kind of slavish support for Israel? And the reason I asked that question is because if you look at the split on the conservative right, you can pretty well draw a line between the likes of Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and and others, even Marjorie Telle Greene to a degree, and others who have been critical of the Israeli government strategy, for example, in the war on Hamas, and those who have steadfastly defended everything Israel has done. There is a running line there developing between the two, and Israel does seem to be a common theme between the split.
Speaker 1: Here's I'm exhausted, man. You know? I'm tired, bro. I got, like, four little kids. I got a lot of taxing on this business to run, this media company to run.
I got a lot of taxing time on my energy. I I am so tired of having this Israel debate. I'm so sick of it. And what's happened is they've done a a hat game, a shell game, where they've swapped out Ukraine for Israel. And I don't know what the hell is our problem in this country with our obsession with getting involved in other people's business.
You know, George Washington, who I think most people would tend to say is our best president. Sorry what he did to you Brits, peers. I know you'll never forgive him for it.
Speaker 0: But Actually, blame King George the third. He was such an imbecile.
Speaker 1: I truly that guy was that guy was your own Joe Biden. That was your Joe Biden Cheers. In in England. The two of them would have got along. George Washington, his final words to the American people, his final words, his last speech before he went off into the sunset, something Barack Obama refuses to do.
But he went off into the sunset and lived out his his days. He said, don't don't get embroiled in foreign entanglements. That's how we lose this place. That's how we destroy our country. These countries have problems of their own.
They have blood feuds. I'm talking about Israel and Ukraine here, by the way. Blood feuds that go back thousands of years before there was an America. And how the hell we're supposed to go in and solve this We're p we're supposed to, like, go come in and, like, somehow beat the solution to something that it goes back to Abraham or or back to to the feudal times, like in the Roman empire, if you're looking at Ukraine, this fanatic obsession I was enraged, by the way, when somebody put up a Ukraine flag in my neighborhood. Yeah.
I live here in Florida. That should be illegal, actually. But, like, somebody put up these Ukraine flags. Like, I would see them popping up over my all over my neighborhood. You go to DC, dude, you're more likely to find a pride flag or a Ukraine flag or an Israel flag than you are to fly find an American flag.
What the hell is that, Piers? You know, it it it's self loathing. It's this and I I think what it really is, if I were to diagnose it, and I'm, you know, I'm no good at this, if I would have the most empty therapy couch on Earth if I opened up a therapy practice, because people would be like, that guy's got that guy's got enough problems of his own. But if I were to diagnose it, Pierce, here's what I'd say. People know that their country is broken, and they know that this place needs so much work.
And that it's gonna be tough work really hard to fix this place. And instead of doing that tough work, they'll they're going to project onto some other country. And we're gonna sit here and woke scold about Israel or Palestine, Hamas, Ukraine, the Donetsk, the you know, whatever, Crimea, Russia, instead of fixing ourselves. It is so much easier to look at someone else and be like, they're a fat ass. They're they're such a slob.
They need to go to the gym, you know, while you're sitting there a hundred and fifty pounds overweight on the couch. It's so much easier to sit there and, like, do the work like, say someone else needs to do work instead of working on yourself. And so that's why I'm disgusted, frankly, by our obsession to just swap out the next country. Trust me. It'll be Taiwan next.
Okay? And then it'll be, you know, Papua New Guinea. You know, whatever. Right? It's gonna be we're gonna find some other obsession of some other little country that we're gonna spend our time and our treasure on, and people are sick of it.
I gotta tell you, peers. People are just sick of it.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report Rep. Tim Burchett alleging Trump’s would-be assassin, Thomas Crooks, was groomed by CIA and MKUltra‑style mind control and dark ops to kill Trump in Butler, PA. He says, “They programmed this kid… buried or burned,” and that the CIA misleads about tools they have. He adds the Deep State is after us, not Trump, with Trump simply standing in the way.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Rep. Tim Burchett says Trump assassin Thomas Crooks was groomed by CIA and MKUltra style mind control programs and dark intelligence ops for the sole purpose of taking out President Trump in Butler, PA. "They programmed this kid. You got a kid who's got access to guns or has some simple knowledge of a firearm, he was programmed. The facts have been buried or burned or whoever knew is either sitting on a beach somewhere and, uh, enjoying a fruity drink or they're dead." "When the CIA says, 'We don't have this thing,' and then their asses are brought into a court of law and they say, "Well, we have it, but we don't use it anymore." Apparently, somebody's using it." "I've said that all along. I've, I've said that. Look at the history. Look at where we're at in this country, the Deep State. It's disgusting. Trump's right. They're not after, they're not after him. They're after us. He's just standing in the way."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues about K Ultra, saying they were sued and denied its existence, then said it exists but isn’t used anymore, and expresses disbelief in the denial. He claims a kid with access to guns or some knowledge was programmed, stating that Christy Noem, Cash Patel, Bongino, and others are reporting facts as they know them, while those who knew the truth are buried, burned, or dead, and suggests they are likely dead. He asserts this is what happens in Washington, says it’s too deep, and wishes for firing everyone to restart, but security concerns prevent that because dangerous people or terrorists could be let go. He says Cash Patel and Bongino are having a hard time due to this, and that he doesn’t care which side, but at their level that’s what happened. He claims the CIA said they don’t have this thing, then brought in, in court of law, that they have it but don’t use it anymore, and suggests somebody is using it and knows to contact these people. He recalls the American Taliban case and asserts that the kid in that case was programmed, noting that nobody talks about it anymore and suggesting it involved American parents and a Greek church. He describes Knoxville crime scenes with local police blocking off scenes, tarps, and keeping people away, and mentions his own sponsorship of legislation on cremation, implying laws may have been violated by quick cremation of the body, possibly eleven days after death, and that if an investigation was ongoing there would be rules about disposal of the body. He adds that he called a marine sniper who said he could have made the shot with iron sights without a scope and that the team got lucky; he references biblical notions about divine awareness of sparrows and hairs on heads, suggesting the sniper might believe it.
Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 is alleging that Thomas Crooks was groomed by some dark intel program, MK Ultra or otherwise, to commit an assassination on that day.
Speaker 0 responds affirmatively, saying he has said so all along and is glad Tucker Carlson’s credibility has brought it out, noting that he often yells this stuff and is disregarded, but urges looking at history, the deep state, and the current state of the country. He claims 12% of the population voting leaves them vulnerable and that there are few people in position who could damage them like Trump, saying they are not after Trump but after “us,” and that Trump is standing in their way.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: K Ultra. Oh, cost you.
Speaker 1: That's right. Yep.
Speaker 0: They they they got sued. They said it didn't exist, and then they got sued. And they said, oh, it exists, but we don't use it anymore. So I don't believe them as far as I can throw the dome off the dadgum cap itol, Benny. You got a kid who's got access to guns or has some simple knowledge of a firearm.
He was programmed. You're exactly right. They programmed this kid, and Christy Noem and Cash and and Bongino and the rest are reporting the facts as they know them. The facts have been buried or burned or whoever knew is either sitting on a beach somewhere and, enjoying a fruity drink or they're dead. I would suggest they're probably dead.
And this is what happens. You claim it doesn't. They label me and you conspiracy theorists, but this is exactly what we see happen. And it happens in Washington. It's it's happening now.
It's too deep. It is and that's why I said, I wish they could go in and just fire everybody, and then just start back. But the but you can't do that because of security. You're gonna fire some good people that are clearly have their thumb in the dike on terrorists or what have you. And that's where we're at.
That's why Cash Patel and Bongino are having such a hard time. I don't Christy, no. I don't either way, I don't I don't give a rip either way. But I think at their level, that's what's happened. And that's that's I don't care.
You can call me a lunatic. But when the CIA says this thing, we don't have this thing, and then they're brought in, their asses are brought in a court of law, they say, well, we have it, but we don't use it anymore. Apparently somebody's using it. They know to contact these people. If you look at the Muslim radicals and and how they they recruited them, you remember they had a a the American Taliban or whatever that kid they caught, and nobody talks about that anymore.
Nobody even remembers it. I think he was his parents were Americans. They went to the Greek church or something. That kid was programmed. And and, you know, and you're right.
They watched the crime scene. I live in Knoxville, Tennessee, brother. If there's a murder out here, our sheriff's department's got that thing blocked off. They got a tarp over it. And and and they've got it, know, cleared.
Nobody can get up on it. Nobody can contaminate the crime scene. This is Knoxville Knox County Sheriff's Department and the city of Knoxville police. And I guarantee you, my Blount County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Wurong, all those people always close off the crime scene. This is casebook.
And and also one other thing, I sponsored some legislation dealing with cremation. So I know a little bit about the, you know, when they bring a body in. There are probably laws in that state that they violated because they cremated that kid, I think, pretty quick, if I'm not correct. If you might Oh, eleven days, yes. Okay.
And if there was an investigation going on, there's probably something in the law that says you cannot dispose of the body. And I think, I think you're right. I think all of it, it was washed, it was planned, And we just got lucky. I'm very close and related to a marine sniper. And I called him after that.
I said, what do you think? And he said, Tim, I could have made that shot with iron sights without a scope with all that stuff. We just got damn lucky. God shined his favor upon us that day. I clearly if you don't believe that, I mean, the bible talks about God knows if a sparrow falls from the sky or how many hairs are on your head.
That guy might believe it.
Speaker 1: You are alleging that Thomas Crooks was groomed by some type of dark intel program, MK Ultra or otherwise Yeah. In order to commit on that day the act of an assassination?
Speaker 0: I I think so. I've said that all along. I've I've said that, and I'm glad somebody with Tucker's credibility, you know, his his ability to and miss my dog snores over there. Sorry for that. That with his credibility has brought it out.
Because I, you know, I I yell this stuff all the time and people just always just perch it. But look at the history. Look at where we're at in this country. Look at the deep state, the the sewer as it is. And it's it's disgusting.
And this is what happens, dude, when 12% of the population goes to the polls. They know we're so vulnerable, and we're we we have very very few people in in in the lineup that could do the the damage to them like Trump. Trump's right. They're not after they're not after him. They're after us.
He's just standing in the way.
reSee.it AI Summary
I note Cincinnati Police Chief Terri Theetge, placed on administrative leave, attacked those who shared the Jazz Festival mob video on Holly and others, blaming social media instead of holding the attackers accountable. I think she should be fired. She said irresponsibility with social media shows one side without context and that social/mainstream media misrepresent circumstances around events.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
THROWBACK: Here is Cincinnati Police Chief Terri Theetge, who was just placed on administrative leave, viciously attacking those who shared the video of the black mob assault at the Jazz Festival on Holly and others. Rather than holding the thugs accountable, she blamed social media. She needs to be fired entirely. “I think by the irresponsibility with social media is it just shows one side of the equation quite frequently without context, without factual context, and then people run with that and then it grows legs and it becomes something bigger that we then have to try to manage as part of the investigation.” “Social media and mainstream media and their commentaries are misrepresentation of the circumstances surrounding any given event.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Social media and journalism can misrepresent the circumstances surrounding an event, and the post seen does not depict the entire incident. What often happens is that social media and mainstream media commentary distort content, which makes it harder to thoroughly investigate the activity and enforce the law. A single post or coverage item can present one side of the story without context, leading to people rushing to conclusions and the narrative “growing legs” that the investigation then has to manage.
Speaker 1 asked where the nearest officers were. Speaker 0 answered that in the central business section they were working; both were in vehicles and had to maneuver through traffic.
Regarding what exactly was distorted, Speaker 0 explained that social media irresponsibility frequently shows one side of the equation without factual context, and then people run with that, causing the issue to grow larger and become more difficult to manage as part of the investigation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another topic I want to cover real quick. Social media and journalism and the role it plays in this incident. And yes, guys, that's you. That is you. Social media.
The post that we've seen does not depict the entire incident. That is one version of what occurred. At times, social media and mainstream media and their commentaries are misrepresentation of the circumstances surrounding any given event. What that does that causes us some difficulties in thoroughly investigating the activity and enforcing the law. Because what happens that social media post and your coverage of it?
Distorts the content of what actually happened. And it makes our job more difficult. Go ahead right here.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Two questions. Where were the nearest officers?
Speaker 0: In the central business section they were working. They were both in vehicles and like I said, they had to maneuver through the traffic.
Speaker 1: Second question is, you had said social media news media distorted the content of what actually happened. What exactly was distorted? I understand that there was one multiple views of the video, but exactly what led up to this? I mean, what was distorted? Distorted?
Speaker 0: Yeah, Yeah. So So I I think think by. By. The irresponsibility with social media is it just shows one side of the equation quite frequently without context, without factual context. And then people run with that.
And then it grows legs and it becomes something bigger that we then have to try to manage as part of the investigation. So hold.
reSee.it AI Summary
I just witnessed the greatest sequence of presidential communications: Trump posts an F-16 meme, “King Trump,” dumping on No Kings protesters and Harry Sisson; Sisson asks why; Vance chimes in with a king meme of Trump, Pelosi, and the libs bowing; Leavitt and Cheung tell a reporter, “Your mom.” A golden timeline.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
We just witnessed the single greatest sequence of presidential communications in American history. - Trump posts an F-16 meme, “King Trump,” dumping sewage on No Kings protesters and Harry Sisson - Harry Sissons asks why. JD Vance jumps in: “I’ll ask him for you,” then follows up with a meme of Trump as king, Pelosi and the libs bowing. - Both Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and Comms Director Stephen Cheung tell a reporter: “Your mom” A truly golden timeline we’re living through.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript argues that the White House has delivered an extraordinary streak of presidential communications over a 24-hour period. It centers on a sequence of provocative exchanges and memetic responses:
- Donald Trump posted a meme showing him flying in an F-16-like plane with a crown, captioned, “king Trump,” and the plane reportedly “dumps raw sewage on all of the no kings protesters.”
- Harry Sisson, who was among those targeted by the meme’s sewage dump, asked, “Can anybody ask Trump why he posted an AI meme of me having poop dumped on my head? Why is Trump pooping on me?”
- JD Vance responded, “I’ll happily ask him for you,” and the moment went viral. Vance followed up with another meme depicting Donald Trump as a king while Nancy Pelosi and “all the libs” bow to him.
- In the same news cycle, Caroline Levitt engaged in a moment described as “your mom card.” The exchange involved a Huffington Post left-wing reporter. The reporter asked, “why you know, who picked Budapest for a new summit with Vladimir Putin?” The White House replied with, “your mom,” and when asked for clarification, White House communications director Stephen Cheung (referred to as Stephen Chang in the transcript) repeated, “your mom.”
The speaker characterizes this sequence as the “single golden timeline,” claiming it to be “the single greatest series of presidential communications to the press in history.” The transcript emphasizes that the events unfolded within the same day and cycle, highlighting the viral spread of the memes and the terse, provocative White House responses. It concludes by stating that observers are “living through it” and notes the remarkable nature of the communications phenomenon.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The White House has been on an absolute barn burner for the last twenty four hours with presidential communications. I would argue is the single greatest run of presidential comms in the history of America. And let me explain myself. One, you have Donald Trump posting this meme where he's flying in an f six scene wearing a crown. It says king Trump on the side of the plane, and he dumps raw sewage on all of the no kings protesters.
In response to this, Harry Sisson, one of the guys who got poop dumped on him in the Trump meme decided to post, hey. Can anybody ask Trump why he posted an AI meme of me having poop dumped on my head? Why is Trump pooping on me? The response of this is JD Vance saying, I'll happily ask him for you, Harry. To which JD goes viral and then also follows up with this meme of Donald Trump as a king and Nancy Pelosi and all the libs bowing to him.
And if you're not done yet in the exact all of the same news cycle, on the same day, Caroline Levitt decides to whip out your mom card. This is a real exchange from Caroline Levitt with a Huffington Post left wing reporter where she says, your mom. The reporter's like, why you know, who picked Budapest for a new summit with Vladimir Putin? And this is a big time live activist journalist to which the response from the White House was your mom picked it. And then when asked for clarification, the White House communications director, Stephen Chang says, your mom.
And that's it. The this this is the single golden timeline. This is the single greatest series of presidential communications to the press in history. You're living through it. It's just remarkable to see.
reSee.it AI Summary
I recount how Congress corruption used to work—partying overseas, sexual entanglements, then blackmail to sway votes. After our interview, members erupted, and soon a Chinese prostitution ring was busted in DC before the next week’s story vanished. Now I say the new playbook is job-based leverage: officials and lobbyists tied to industries, with spouses or partners in those sectors, effectively owning you.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Rep. Tim Burchett joins Tucker Carlson and revisits the corruption in Congress he first exposed on our show many years back. Lawmakers partying overseas, sleeping around, then being blackmailed into changing votes. He reveals members erupted after our interview, warning, “You can’t be saying that stuff.” And the next week a Chinese prostitution ring was busted in DC. That was the old playbook. Now, he exposes the new one. Watch: “When I did that show with Benny, the next, and oh, I caught hell. I caught hell. Members said, ‘oh, you can't be saying that stuff, Burchett.’” “The very next week, a Chinese prostitution ring was busted in where Washington, DC and who are the and it was listed in the paper. Who is their client list? High ranking officials in government, elected officials, and lobbyists. Well, and then the next week, a story disappeared.” “I think what they do now mostly is they have jobs. If you look at these guys and gals, And, you know, they have a wife and or girlfriend that'll work in one of these industries.“ “I think that's how they do it now. You have them in political offices, you have them in business offices, you have them all over. They're employed. And so they own your ass. They're employed by these people.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 2 notes that some members of Congress may be personally compromised and don’t want the truth to get out. Speaker 3 says: “You got powerful people, and they write the big checks” who “love their money” and protect it. He describes a honeypot tactic, noting Russians used it; overseas trips can lead to scandal, with a well-dressed man whispering, “There’s tapes out on you” before a key vote. He recalls a trip with Andy Biggs and being pressured after sleeping with someone abroad. He cites a Chinese prostitution ring busted in Washington, DC with a client list of “High ranking officials, in government, elected officials, and lobbyists,” whose story disappeared. He says these people are “employed by forces that want to control Congress” via spouses or employment agencies, “they employ them.” He concludes, “America's not buying that… 12% of the population votes, this is what you get.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You said earlier in our conversation that members of Congress were compromised. What did you mean by that?
Speaker 1: Well, I was on can I can I name a rival of yours? Or maybe I don't know
Speaker 0: if I want you to name anything that comes
Speaker 1: to mind. I was on the Benny show, and it was early on, and Benny and I had become friends. I didn't realize he was so close to Charlie Kirk, but he had me on early on. And honestly, I didn't know who he was. And he asked me about that.
Speaker 2: You mentioned recently in an interview that there may be some members of congress who are personally compromised by this, and they don't want the truth to get out. Can you expound on that?
Speaker 3: Yeah. 100%. You got powerful people, and they write the big checks. Well, let's be honest. In powerful people in this country, they write the big checks.
And they you know, they're the ones out on the tarmac when the president comes and visits, and and whichever party they're in. They always either out on the tarmac or in the private room. They're the ones that write the big checks. They don't care who's in they hate this country. They hate what we're about, but they love their portfolios, and they love their money more than they do anything else, and they protect it.
And they protect the people that that do that. And by doing so, you know, the old honeypot, the Russians do that, and I'm sure members of congress have been caught up. Why in the world would would good conservatives vote for crazy stuff like the what we've been seeing out of congress. It's how it works. You're visiting, you're out of the country or out of town or you're in a motel or bar in DC and some whatever you're you're into, women or men or whatever, comes up, and they're very attractive, and they're laughing at your jokes, and and they and you're buying them a drink.
Next thing you know, you're in the motel room with them naked, and next thing you know, you know, you're about to make a key vote, and what happens? Some well dressed person comes up and whispers in your ear, hey, man. There's tapes out on you. Were you in a motel room on whatever with whoever? And then you're like, uh-oh.
And he said, you really ought not be voting for this thing.
Speaker 1: That and I said, well, said, here's the way it works. It's the way it's worked in the past. The Russians even have a name for it, you know, the honeypot. And I don't go on overseas trips much. I've been to one trip, and that was prior, I've been on one Codell, I went to the Mexican border, and I went down one day with Andy Biggs, who's a good Mormon, he's hopeful, maybe be the governor of Arizona.
But he said, Burgett, we're going on this trip. I know you don't go on these things, but it's one like you'd like, we'll go down there and back, we'll stay at an awful motel, we'll eat some cheap Mexican food, some barbecue, and we'll put you on a plane back to Tennessee. And I said, all right, Andy, I'll do it. That's about it that I've done. And so what happens is you're overseas, you're being told how great you are, you're sitting at a bar and and they know what you're into, guys, gals, combination thereof, drugs, whatever, and they'll hook you up and you're thinking you're the stud, your wife's away, nobody will know halfway around the world.
You end up sleeping with somebody, and then you're out, next day you're flying back to America, you're back front row at the church, and then you're getting ready to make a key boat, and somebody comes up and whispers in your ear, hey man, are you in a motel room with a girl in Istanbul or something? And he's like, oh crap. He goes, man, we don't want that out. And he goes, no, no, no, no, no, we don't not gonna put that out. He said, if you can help us on this little bill though, you know, now that's the way they used to do it.
And I'm not so certain they don't do that now. And it's funny when I did that show with Benny the next, and oh, I caught hell. I caught hell.
Speaker 0: So you said that?
Speaker 1: I said that. And members said, oh, you can't be saying that stuff, Birchit. Why? Truth hurts, I guess, for some people and other people.
Speaker 0: Have you ever, by the
Speaker 1: way, just parenthetically, ever been attacked for saying something false or only true things? Only true things, only true things. So it's funny, the next week, Tucker, there was this huge, and I said, it always gets covered up, and everything gets covered up, and then somebody owns you. That's Compromise. That'll be the title of my book if I ever write a book, Tim Birchitt's Compromised Washington, because that's what happens, or it has happened in the past.
The very next week, a Chinese prostitution ring was busted. In where? Washington, DC. And it was listed in the paper, who is their client list? High ranking officials, in government, elected officials, and lobbyists.
Now, to me, that's all kinds of red flags going up all over the place. Well, and then the next week, the story disappeared. Yeah. Of course it did. But I think what they do now mostly is they have jobs.
If you look at these guys and gals, and they have a wife and or girlfriend that'll work in one of these industries. I mean, dollars 100,000 to a multibillion dollar corporation is nothing. I mean, it's an extra supply of paper clips or something. I think that's how they do it now. You have them in political offices, you have them in business offices, you have them all over.
You have what? They're employed, and so they own your ass. See, they're employed by these people, I'm sorry. Get my wife a job, get my girl a job. Get them both a job, you know, and keep them separate.
And I know of, I mean, it's just common. I I hear about it all the time. Hear about it.
Speaker 0: Very common.
Speaker 1: I hear about, I mean, they just talk about, oh, she works over at defense. She works over at justice. She works for this case, or he does, or somebody does, or they work back in the district for such and such. I mean, it's just human nature.
Speaker 0: People that members of Congress
Speaker 1: are sleeping with, either legally or not, are employed by forces that want to control members of Congress. That's what they used to do. And now I'm pretty sure I knew of instances where that happened when I was in the legislature, and now they do it through the employment agencies. Through employment agencies. I mean, employ them is what I'm saying.
Speaker 0: They employ them. Yeah, no, I mean, I know a bunch of members of Congress. Can, right off the top of my head, I can think of with spouses in this or that industry.
Speaker 1: And they might be incredibly qualified, but the reality is America's not buying that. Nobody should. But again, 12% of the population votes, this is what you get.
reSee.it AI Summary
I was threatened and my family targeted; a man is arrested and faces federal charges. I thank President Trump, AG Pam Bondi, and the Department of Justice for acting quickly to protect us. I believe left-wing violence is rising, but we will not be silenced or deterred. Inspired by Charlie Kirk, we will go on offense, work harder, and push TPUSA’s mission forward with a stronger voice. Thank you for leadership from POTUS, Pam Bondi, and The Justice Department.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
An individual has been arrested for threatening to kill my wife, my four children, and me. He sent a letter to my home saying he hated our views and wanted us dead. He is being charged federally and faces prison time. I want to thank President Trump, AG Pam Bondi, and the Department of Justice for immediately acting and saving my family. We are forever grateful. Left-wing violence is exploding with copycats appearing everywhere. It is the greatest threat to our country today, targeting people for simply speaking the truth. Let me be absolutely clear: We will not be silenced. We will not back down. We will not break. You lit a fire that cannot be put out. Charlie Kirk taught us to go on offense. That is exactly what we will do. We will work harder, speak louder, and grow stronger. We will continue to move TPUSA’s mission forward. For Charlie. Thank you for your strong leadership @POTUS, @AGPamBondi, and @TheJusticeDept.
Video Transcript AI Summary
One month ago today, I witnessed my friend of ten years, someone who I considered a brother, a loving husband, a devoted father, a generational leader, get assassinated on a livestream by a left wing radical.
Approximately one year ago, I witnessed the president of The United States get shot in the head by a left wing radical who also took the life of a transporter in front of his daughters and wife.
Two months ago, Christian children kneeling and praying in a church Were slaughtered. By a left wing extremist.
If it's happening every single week, is it that extreme, or has the Democrat party mainstreamed violence as a political tool?
Violence has been mainstreamed by the Democrat Party. It is not extremist.
Is any Democrat courageous enough to disavow violence?
The Trump administration making America safe again. God bless them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One month ago today, I witnessed my friend of ten years, someone who I considered a brother, a loving husband, a devoted father, a generational leader, get assassinated on a livestream by a left wing radical. Approximately one year ago, I witnessed the president of The United States get shot in the head by a left wing radical who also took the life of a transporter in front of his daughters and wife. Two months ago, Christian children kneeling and praying in a church Were slaughtered. By a left wing extremist. And two weeks ago federal law enforcement.
Was shot at multiple sniper rounds in a federal facility. By a left wing extremist. If it's happening every single week, is it that extreme, or has the Democrat party mainstreamed violence as a political tool? The individual who wrote me described why he wanted me dead. I was a white cis Christian Trump supporter.
They described in great detail how I would be killed in an open field just like Charlie. How much blood would come out of my head and neck when it was blown off. This individual described orphaning my four beautiful children and widowing my wife with great joy. You might want to say another left wing radical. Another extremist.
And to that I would like to direct your attention to the state of Virginia. Where Democrats have nominated and are about to vote for the chief law enforcement officer in that state, a man who has done the exact same thing, an individual who's calling for the assassination by bullets of Republicans that he disagrees with. The killing of their children, The slaughtering of, as he says, little fascists are my four innocent beautiful children, little fascists. Violence has been mainstreamed by the Democrat Party. It is not extremist.
It is mainstream. And we need a moment of reckoning here. This has to stop. This cycle must end. Is any Democrat courageous enough to disavow violence?
To call for individuals that espouse these things like what happened to my family or what's happening in Virginia to call for those kind of candidates to step down? Will Democrats vote for that? Because if you're voting for that, then implicitly you're encouraging it. You're endorsing it. I don't want political violence.
I want peace in my nation. I love this country. I want to be able to debate like Charlie did. I want to be able to raise my family in peace. That is our birthright.
But you cannot make peace with evil as a Christian. You cannot unite with people who want you dead. I want unity in this nation. I want to be able to agree on more than what we disagree on. But for that first to happen, we must understand the battle.
We are fighting good versus evil, darkness versus light, and good must conquer evil. Do not make peace with evil. To that end, and in conclusion, I would like to thank federal law enforcement, Pam Bondi, Cash Patel, Dan Bongino, the FBI, the DOJ, the Tampa Police Department, the detectives here with absolute pinpoint accuracy, professionalism, courtesy, swift and tact, they were able to act instantly in order to make sure that my family was safe, potentially to preserve the lives of my children. And they're doing that for families all around the country in many different ways. Every American should unite behind that cause.
No matter who you are, you should say, this is a country where families should be able to raise their children safely, where people can have peaceful disagreements, and we can all live together under one American flag. I just want to profoundly thank the Trump administration and federal enforcement and local law enforcement for saving my family. I will never forget it. It is the greatest goodness that has ever been done to me. And that is a thing that every American can get behind.
The Trump administration making America safe again. God bless them.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
BREAKING: The FBI has fired the agents who were photographed kneeling at a 2020 George Floyd protest. https://t.co/TZONLmRAlL
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
BREAKING: New footage of attempted Trump assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks practicing dry-fire drills with a handgun in his room has been released. https://t.co/sR7nbllx1F
reSee.it AI Summary
A man named Xaelyn Dunbar, 19, was arrested for making social media threats just hours before a vigil for Charlie Kirk at the University of Texas at San Antonio. He has been charged with a terroristic threat after posting on Facebook that he would use his truck to disrupt the vigil attended by 1,000 people. His comment indicated intentions to create chaos, stating, "This is a disgrace... Ima make this a movie … me and my truck.”
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
BREAKING: A man has been arrested for posting social media threats just hours before a vigil for Charlie Kirk at the University of Texas at San Antonio. Xaelyn Dunbar, 19, has been charged with a terroristic threat for threatening on Facebook to use his truck to attack a vigil of 1,000 people. His comment: "This is a disgrace and I can tell you right now ima make sure this won’t be a good nor comforting vigil yall watch and see. Ima make this a movie … me and my truck.” More left-wing violence.
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a powerful moment where Greg Gutfeld addressed the media's portrayal of Jimmy Kimmel as a victim following his suspension for comments about Charlie Kirk. Gutfeld emphasized that while Kimmel faces consequences, it pales in comparison to the real victim, Charlie Kirk, and his family. He criticized the media for trying to equate Kimmel's situation with Kirk's tragic circumstances, asserting that Kimmel, as a wealthy individual, is not deserving of sympathy. Gutfeld highlighted the broader issue of how conservatives have faced unjust treatment online.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Everybody stop what you’re doing and watch this. Greg Gutfeld just shut down liberals who are portraying Jimmy Kimmel as the victim and melting down over his suspension for lying about Charlie Kirk’s assassination. “It's great, even in death, Charlie keeps winning debates.” “You know, the media, this is what's disgusting. Just look at the reaction. The media is trying to make Jimmy Kimmel into their Charlie Kirk. But as if like getting fired is the same as getting fired upon.” “The decades of brainwash that created justification for violence and for murder. Sorry guys, he's not a victim. The victim is Charlie Kirk. The victims are his family.” “I don't shed any tears for a lefty millionaire who can still go home and see his kids. Your side got thousands of conservatives thrown off social media.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's great. Even in death, Charlie keeps winning debates.
The media this is what's disgusting.
The media is trying to make Jimmy Kimmel into their Charlie Kirk.
Sorry, guys. He's not a victim.
The victim is Charlie Kirk. The victims are his family.
Jason Bateman predicts a reckoning over a Kimmel suspension.
Stelter that Don't say that.
Stelter tried to get us off the air and we're on a private airway.
Why they were doing this? They were promoting rhetoric that demonized people with different viewpoints.
So, aren't there isn't a both sides here.
You can't turn Kimmel into Kirk.
Mutually assured destruction, like what Trump is doing with lawfare.
You hunted us. You hunted conservatives.
Well, maybe you won't hunt us anymore if we hunt you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's great. Even in death, Charlie keeps winning debates. You know, the media this is what's disgusting. Just just look at the reaction. The media is trying to make Jimmy Kimmel into their Charlie Kirk.
But, as if like getting fired is the same as getting fired upon. That's what disgusts me is how they're trying this is a blatant effort to get the stink off them. The decades of brainwash that created justification for violence and for murder. Sorry, guys. He's not a victim.
The victim is Charlie Kirk. The victims are his family. I don't shed any tears for a lefty millionaire who can still go home and see his kids. So, so this look at this through that prism. Jason Bateman predicts a reckoning over a Kimmel suspension.
Sorry, dude. The reckoning began without you. Your side got thousands of conservatives thrown off social media. CNN tried to get Fox off the air. Do you remember that?
Stelter that Don't say that. Stelter tried to get us off the air and we're on a private airway. We're not in a public thing like ABC is. Why they were doing this? They were promoting rhetoric that demonized people with different viewpoints.
So, aren't there isn't a both sides here. You can't turn Kimmel into Kirk. That is disgusting. And I'm gonna control myself. Let's look at the obvious here.
You have to look at this like mutually assured destruction. Facebook was pressured by the president or the White House to throw people out. Trump was thrown off Twitter. You had Roseanne, Gina Carino, Dave Chappelle, Shane Gillis, J. K.
Rowling. The list is endless. We could take a whole hour to do it. How do you stop that? Mutually assured destruction, like what Trump is doing with lawfare.
You hunted us. You hunted Republicans. You hunted conservatives. Well, maybe you won't hunt us anymore if we hunt you. And lastly, I am so tired of these self centered fools on CNN and MSNBC with their performative outrage because they will never, ever stand outside before thousands of people and debate people who don't like them.
They are, like me, indoor cats. Use was it Essie Cupp used the phrase systematically killing free speech? A young man was systematically killed over free speech last week. Kimmel has every right and every opportunity to do a live free show outdoors, and so could all those people on CNN. But they don't.
If they did, they probably wouldn't get shot because no one is demonizing them. No one is calling them Hitler. That was your gig.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
This is sick. @jimmykimmel is explicitly stating that MAGA killed Charlie Kirk and is victim blaming the assassination on Charlie’s movement. It’s definitionally evil and a malicious lie. Kimmel must be held accountable. https://t.co/PznwF4lgQl
Video Transcript AI Summary
"We had some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it." "In between the finger pointing, there was grieving." "On Friday, the White House flew the flags at half staff, which got some criticism." "But on a human level, you can see how hard the president is taking this." "The loss of your friend, Charlie Kirk." "May I ask, sir, personally, how are you holding up over the last day and a half, sir?" "I think very good." "Yes. He's at the fourth stage of grief, construction." "Demolition, Demolition, construction. Construction," "This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he called a friend." "This is how a four year old mourns a goldfish." "Okay?"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We had some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it. In between the finger pointing, there was grieving. On Friday, the White House flew the flags at half staff, which got some criticism. But on a human level, you can see how hard the president is taking this.
Speaker 1: The loss of your friend, Charlie Kirk. May I ask, sir, personally, how are you holding up over the last day and a half, sir? I think very good. And by the way, right there, you see all the trucks? They've just started construction of the new ballroom for the White House, which is something they've been trying to get, as you know, for about a hundred and fifty years, and it's gonna be a beauty.
Speaker 0: Yes. He's at the fourth stage of grief, construction. Demolition, Demolition, construction. Construction, This is not how an adult grieves the murder of someone he called a friend. This is how a four year old mourns a goldfish.
Okay?
reSee.it AI Summary
The FCC Chairman is taking a firm stance against Jimmy Kimmel, ABC, and Disney for allegedly spreading misinformation about Charlie Kirk's assassin. He describes Kimmel's claims as "malicious lies" and suggests they could lead to Kimmel's suspension and jeopardize ABC's broadcast license. The Chairman emphasizes the FCC's obligation to ensure public interest and warns that action must be taken against Kimmel or further consequences will follow. He calls for Disney to implement changes and urges local stations to reject content that doesn't serve their communities.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
BREAKING: The FCC Chairman is threatening immediate action against Jimmy Kimmel, ABC, and Disney for deliberately misleading the public by claiming Charlie Kirk’s assassin was a MAGA Conservative. Chairman Brendan Carr calls Kimmel’s malicious lies are “truly sick” and says they should result in Kimmel's immediate suspension and may lead to ABC losing its broadcast license. Chairman Carr confirms the agency has a “strong case” to hold Kimmel, ABC, and Disney accountable for spreading dangerous, politically motivated misinformation. "This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to take action on Kimmel or there is going to be additional work for the FCC ahead." "They have a license granted by us at the FCC, and that comes with it an obligation to operate in the public interest." "There are calls for Kimmel to be fired. I think you could certainly see a path forward for suspension over this." "The FCC could make a strong argument that this is sort of an intentional effort to mislead the American people about a very core fundamental fact, a very important matter." "Disney needs to see some change here, but the individual licensed stations that are taking their content, it's time for them to step up and say this, you know, garbage to the extent that that's what comes down the pipe in the future isn't something that we think serves the needs of our local communities. But, but this sort of status quo is obviously not, not acceptable where we are." Thank you for your strong leadership here, Chairman @BrendanCarrFCC
Video Transcript AI Summary
"Speaker 0: 'You know, when you look at the conduct that has taken place by Jimmy Kimmel, it appears to be some of the sickest conduct possible.' He notes 'avenues here for the FCC' and says this is not an isolated incident, citing Swalwell's tweet that 'Charlie Kirk's killer was a straight white male from a Republican family that voted for Donald Trump.' He alleges Kimmel 'to play into that narrative that this was somehow a MAGA or Republican motivated person.' He stresses broadcasters 'have a license granted by us at the FCC, and that comes with it an obligation to operate in the public interest.' He explains two buckets: 'national programmers' and licensed TV stations, and says 'news distortion' and 'broadcast hoaxes' are prohibitions. Potential actions include 'suspension,' fines, or 'license revocation.' He notes Disney will have a chance to 'put in, their arguments' before a vote."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, when you look at the conduct that has taken place by Jimmy Kimmel, it appears to be some of the sickest conduct possible. As you've indicated, there are, you know, avenues here for the FCC, so there are are some ways in which I need to be a little bit careful because we could be called ultimately to be a judge on some of these claims that come up. But I don't think this is an isolated incident. I mean, you go back to representative Swalwell, and he had a tweet out last week where he was saying that, you know, emphasizing that Charlie Kirk's killer was a straight white male from a Republican family that voted for Donald Trump. In in some quarters, there's a very concerted effort to try to lie to the American people about the nature, as you indicated, one of the most significant newsworthy public interest acts that we've seen in a long time.
And what appears to be an action appears to be an action by Jimmy Kimmel to play into that narrative that this was somehow a MAGA or Republican motivated person. If that's what happened here with his conduct, that is that is really, really sick. And I've been very clear. From the moment that I have become chairman of the FCC, I wanna reinvigorate the public interest. What people don't understand is that the broadcasters, and you've gotten this right, are entirely different than people that use other forms of communication.
They have a license granted by us at the FCC, and that comes with it an obligation to operate in the public interest. And we can get into some ways that we've been trying to reinvigorate the public interest and some changes that we've seen. But frankly, when you see stuff like this I mean, look. We can do this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to change conduct to take action, frankly, on Kimmel or, you know, there's gonna be additional work for the FCC ahead.
Speaker 1: What kind of action would you see? I, at the very least, would like to have an on air apology from Jimmy Kimmel to the Kirk family, to all of those who he slandered because he did say that Charlie Kirk, he is effectively saying that our movement did this. Our movement killed Charlie, that Charlie was deserving of this effectively. And we've seen that rear its head. This happens quite regularly, actually, on MSNBC and on other networks where they're trying to victim blame.
And what that does, mister chairman, respectfully, is continues the lie and continues the threat level to say effectively that we have no share in this problem at all on the left. This is a clear cut case. What would you like to see done at ABC?
Speaker 0: Well, look. Think I think what you said there strikes me as a a very reasonable minimal step that can be taken. I mean, obviously, look. There's calls for Kim will be fired. I think, you know, you could certainly see a path forward for, suspension over this.
And again, you know, the FCC is gonna have remedies that we could look at. And again, you know, we may ultimately be called to be a judge on that. But Yeah. This also strikes me as sort of conduct that, to some extent, shows some sort of desperate irrelevance. I mean, we're sort of exiting an era where the three main broadcast legacy broadcast networks could control and dictate the narrative to the American people.
And one of the things that president Trump did when he ran for office, he he ran directly at that legacy media establishment. He smashed the facade that they get to control what we say, what we think, the narrative around events. And we're seeing a lot of consequences that are flowing from president Trump doing that. Mean, NPR has been defunded. PBS has been defunded.
Colbert is retiring. Joy Reid is out at MSNBC. Terry Moran has gone from ABC. It's now admitting that they are biased. CBS has now made some commitments to us that they're gonna return to more fact based journalism.
And so I think you see some lashing out from people like Kimmel who are, frankly, talentless and are looking for ways to get attention. But, you know, their grip on the narrative is slipping. That doesn't mean that it's still not, you know, important to hold in the public interest standard. That's that's what we're gonna have to do.
Speaker 1: So we did an elucidate and enumerate a number of statutes that could be used against ABC. If you would, mister, chairman, would you just explain for us what broadcasting in the public interest means? I don't think most people understand actually the depth of how important it is that ABC, NBC, CBS have these gratuitous broadcast privileges granted to them by the American taxpayer.
Speaker 0: Yeah. The right way to sort of explain this to people so they understand it is in the media landscape as relevant here, there's two main buckets of actors. One, you've got what we call national programmers. That's what Comcast is. Comcast NBC, that's what Disney is, Disney ABC.
They're the ones that effectively create and produce these shows. They then provide those shows to individually licensed TV stations. And those TV stations are in the main owned by independent companies, independent from Comcast and Disney. But Disney and Comcast both own some televisions themselves. So start from the idea that you have national programmers that create the show, including the Kimmel show, and then they're given to and distributed over licensed TV station.
It's the licensed TV stations that have the public interest standard, including those TV stations that Comcast and Disney owned. So FCC regulatory action focuses on those individual stations. And one thing that we're trying to do is to empower those local stations to serve their own communities. And the public interest means you can't be running a narrow partisan circus and still meeting your public interest obligations. It means you can't be engaging in a pattern of news distortion.
We have a rule on the book that interprets a public interest standard that says news distortion, is something that is prohibited. Likewise, we have a rule that addresses broadcast hoaxes. And so, again, over the years, the FCC has stepped back from enforcing it, I and don't think it's been to the benefit of anybody. Just look at the credibility of these legacy media. It's absolutely through the floor.
They used to be able to say at least they were more trustworthy than congress, but now they're even less trustworthy than congress. And so I think as a business matter for them, something has to change. And at the FCC, you know, we need to reinvigorate this. So, again, there's actions that we can take on licensed broadcasters. And, frankly, I think that it's it's it's really sort of past time that a lot of these licensed broadcasters themselves push back on Comcast and Disney and say, listen.
We are going to preempt. We are not gonna run Kimmel anymore until you straighten this out because we, we licensed broadcaster, are running the possibility of fines or license revocation from the FCC if we continue to run content that ends up being a pattern of news distortion. So I think, again, Disney needs to see some change here, but the individual licensed stations that are taking their content, it's time for them to step up and say, this, you know, garbage, to the extent that that's what comes down the pipe in the future, isn't something that we think serves the needs of our local communities. But but this sort of status quo is obviously not not acceptable where we are.
Speaker 1: You believe that, what Jimmy Kimmel said rises to the level of news distortion?
Speaker 0: Look. Again, the incident could be called upon to be an ultimate judge in that, but at at at this point, I think it's, you know, clear it appears to be clear that you can make a strong argument that this is sort of an intentional effort to mislead the American people about a very core fundamental fact or very important matter. At the end of the day, if we do get called upon to to cast a vote on this, Disney will have a chance to put in, their arguments and explain it. But, you know, this is a very, very, you know, serious issue right now for Disney. Yeah.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a chilling text exchange between Robinson and his roommate after a murder. Robinson instructed his roommate to look under his keyboard and revealed he was involved in the crime, expressing regret for involving him. He detailed his plan to retrieve a rifle he had hidden, fearing it could be traced back to him. Robinson mentioned feeling compelled to act against the victim's hatred and discussed the potential consequences of losing the rifle. He urged his roommate to stay silent if questioned by police and expressed concern for their well-being.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
BREAKING: Utah County DA reads the full text message exchange between Charlie Kirk’s assassin and his transgender boyfriend/roommate after committing the murder: ROBINSON: "Drop what you're doing, look under my keyboard." ROOMMATE: "You are joking right?" ROBINSON: "I am still okay, my love. Shouldn't be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still. To be honest, I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you." ROOMMATE: "You weren't the one who did it, right?" ROBINSON: "I am, I am, I'm sorry." ROOMMATE: "I thought they caught the person." ROBINSON: "No, they grabbed some crazy old dude, then interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. It's quiet, almost enough to get out, but there's one vehicle lingering." ROOMMATE: "Why?" ROBINSON: "Why did I do it? I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully they have moved on. I haven't seen anything about them finding it." ROOMMATE: "How long have you been planning this?" ROBINSON: "A bit over a week, I believe. I can get close to it, but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don't want to chance it. I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle. I'm worried what my old man would do if I didn't bring back Grandpa's rifle. IDEK if it had a serial number, but it wouldn't trace to me. I worry about prints. I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits. I might have to abandon it and hope they don't find prints." "How the F will I explain losing it to my old man? Only thing I left was the rifle wrapped in a towel. Remember how he was engraving bullets? The F in messages are mostly a big meme. If I see notice bulge U-W-U on Fox News, I might have a stroke, all right, I'm gonna have to leave it. That really F in sucks. Judging from today, I'd say grandpa's gun does just fine IDK. I think that was a 2K dollar scope." "Delete this exchange. My dad wants photos of the rifle. He says, Grandpa wants to know who has what. The feds released a photo of the rifle and it is very unique. He's calling me, RN. Not answering. Since Trump got into office, my dad has been pretty diehard MAGA. I'm gonna turn myself in willingly. One of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff. Again, you are all I worry about love. Don't take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent."
Video Transcript AI Summary
"drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard." "I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm going to take it." "You're joking." "I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down." "If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence." "I might have to abandon it and hope they don't find prints." "Remember how I was engraving bullets?" "The feds released a photo of the rifle, and it is very unique." "I'm gonna turn myself in willingly." "Robinson, don't talk to the media, please. Don't take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The roommate. Police interviewed Robinson's roommate, a biological male who was was involved in a romantic relationship with Robinson. The roommate told police that the roommate received messages from Robinson about the shooting, and and he did provide those messages to police. On 09/10/2025, the roommate received a text message from Robinson which said, drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard.
The roommate looked under the keyboard and found a note that stated, quote, I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm going to take it. Police found a photograph of this note. The following exchange text exchange then took place. After reading the note, the roommate responded, what? You're joking.
Right? Robinson, I am still okay, my love, but I'm stuck in Orem for a little while longer yet. Shouldn't be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still. To be honest, I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you.
Roommate, you weren't the one who did it. Right? Robinson, I am. I am. I'm sorry.
Roommate, I thought they caught the person. Robinson, no. They grabbed some crazy old dude, then interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. It's quiet, almost enough to get out, but there's one vehicle lingering.
Roommate. Why? Robinson. Why did I do it? Roommate.
Yeah. Robinson. I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence.
Going to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully, they have moved on. I haven't seen anything about them finding it. Roommate, how long have you been planning this? Robinson, a bit over a week, I believe.
I can get close to it, but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don't wanna chance it. Robinson again. I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle. I'm worried what my old man would do if I didn't bring back grandpa's rifle.
I d e k if it's had a serial number, but it wouldn't trace to me. I worry about prints. I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits. Didn't have the ability or time to bring it with. I might have to abandon it and hope they don't find prints.
How the f will I explain losing it to my old man? Only thing I left was the rapple was the rifle wrapped in a towel. Remember how I was engraving bullets? The f in messages are mostly a big meme. If I see notice bulge u w u on Fox New, I might have a stroke alright.
I'm gonna have to leave it. That really effing sucks. Judging from today, I'd say grandpa's gun does just fine IDK. I think that was a 2 a a 2 k dollar scope. Wink.
Wink. Robinson. Robinson again. Delete this exchange. Again, Robinson.
My dad wants photos of the rifle. He says grandpa wants to know who has what. The feds released a photo of the rifle, and it is very unique. He's calling me, RN, not answering. Robinson, since Trump got into office, my dad has been pretty diehard MAGA.
Robinson, I'm gonna turn myself in willingly. One of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff. Again, you are all I worry about love. That came from Robinson. Roommate, I'm much more worried about you.
Robinson, don't talk to the media, please. Don't take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent. The search for Robin
reSee.it AI Summary
No one can replace this chair. Charlie Kirk is a martyr, and martyrs grow stronger. We must strive to continue his mission in our own imperfect ways. For Charlie, the American Martyr and Christian Soldier, let us defeat the evil that took him from us. So help us, God.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
No one will ever fill this chair. But Charlie Kirk is a martyr. And martyrs only become more powerful. We must all, in our own poor and inadequate ways, seek to carry on Charlie’s mission. For Charlie. American Martyr. Christian Soldier. May we defeat the evil that stole him from us. So help us, God.
reSee.it AI Summary
DeCarlos Brown Jr. was refreshingly honest about his intentions, admitting he would kill again if released, reflecting his nature as a 14-time criminal. The real issue lies with judges like Teresa Stokes, who viewed him as a victim and overlooked the threat he posed to innocent lives. Their actions twisted justice, prioritizing ideology over safety and leaving blood on their hands. The system ultimately failed Iryna Zarutska, as the criminals were upfront about their danger while the judges failed to protect society.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
At least DeCarlos Brown Jr. was honest. As a 14-time criminal, he openly admitted in his actions that if released, he would kill again. It’s in his nature. The real dishonesty lies with judges like Teresa Stokes, who treated a career criminal as the victim and ignored the danger he posed to innocent people. They twisted justice, put ideology above safety, and left blood on their hands. The system failed Iryna Zarutska. The criminals were honest about their threat. The judges pretended to protect society while enabling murder. At least he was honest. The dishonest ones are on the bench.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker frames Carlos Brown Junior as "an evil and sick man" who "deserves the death penalty" and a "speedy trial." He notes Brown, 35 with "14 different prior arrests," was "being honest" in saying, "if you release me again, I will kill. It is my nature." He attacks "the public defenders, the woke activist judges" and calls for naming them and showing their faces on X: "Show me the faces of the judges. I want them." He cites judge Teresa Stokes who "released 14 time criminal to Carlos Brown Junior," and says, "This judge, there you go. This is your judge, Charlotte. Said it's found good in DeCarlos Brown Junior." He proclaims, "the only honest person" is Brown Junior and asks, "Isn’t the dishonest one the judge?" He argues this is "an inversion of the justice of God" and says, "What is her name? Let's put up her photo again."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of course, this is an evil and sick man. Of course, he deserves the death penalty. Of course, he deserves it now. After his trial after his speedy trial. Put up his mug shots one more time.
At the very least, he was being honest. Please let me explain myself. At the very least, to Carlos Brown junior, 35 years old, with 14 different prior arrests was being honest. At least he was saying, if you release me again, I will kill. It is my nature.
It is what I will do. I will not stop. I will continue to commit heinous act after heinous act until the end. So goes demonic possession. You can read about it in the bible.
But at the very least, he was being honest here. The people who are being dishonest were his public defenders, the woke activist judges of whom we will name and shame on this program. I've never done this, Jack, but Jack, who is a producer on the show, I want the names of the judges, and I want their faces. Jack, if you wouldn't mind, I want this up in a post on X. If you wouldn't mind, I want to start like hunting down from an information standpoint.
Who are these judges? Who let him go? We can find these records. Show me the faces of the judges. I want them.
Show me the faces of the judges. I want people to see who it is because the state is responsible for this murder and for many other murders across the country, we're just gonna focus on this one. Okay. Here's one judge. Yeah.
Teresa Stokes released 14 time criminal to Carlos Brown Junior. This judge, there you go. This is your judge, Charlotte. Said it's found good in DeCarlos Brown Junior. You know, there's only one honest person.
Of course, the Carlos Brown Junior is killed killed and deserves the death penalty. Deserves swift justice. God. What what about this judge? Well, doesn't she play some part here?
Isn't she partially responsible? In a way, please go with me here and understand what I'm trying to say. In a way, isn't to Carlos Brown junior being honest? Isn't he the only honest party here in screaming through his prior arrest and behavior that I am a monster who will kill again? Isn't he the one being honest?
Isn't the dishonest one the judge? How much of the blood is on her gavel? The entire the entire system of restorative justice. I'm telling you, you can't run a society. You cannot run a society where black is white, where the evil is called good, where men are called women, women are called men.
You can't do you cannot you cannot reverse the truth of God. You're destined to fail. And what I'm say I'm saying that is connected. Let me explain. What has been done here has been an inversion of the justice of God.
We have judges in our society whose role it is is to say this animal is unfit for civilized society. We put them in a cage. We lock them up. Death penalty will probably will hopefully be the result here. We'll see.
It is the role of judges to do that. What judges have done in the case of DeCarlos Brown junior is say that the criminal is actually the victim. Do you understand? It's the inversion. It is the it is the it is black as white.
Day is night. The sky is red. It is the abject inversion of reality. Men are women. Women are men.
Men can get pregnant. It is spitting in the face of an orderly society of god's society. It's spitting in the face of natural order. DeCarlos Brown junior has screamed from the rooftops that I am unfit to live in society, in peaceful society. And instead judges, activist judges, like, what's her name?
There's a couple of them, but there are a few. What is her name? Let's put up her photo again. Have decided to say actually to Carlos Brown junior, it is not the Ukrainian refugee arena who is the victim. You're the victim.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨BREAKING: ICE raided a St. Charles buffet and a nearby home arresting 20 criminal aliens and charging the owners for hiring and harboring them. The owners allegedly provided housing and transportation for the criminal aliens. The restaurant, which opened in May, has now been shut down.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tonight, a Saint Charles buffet is shut down after federal agents raided the restaurant and a nearby home. A federal grand jury indicted two people from Saint Charles County for 'bringing in and harboring immigrants who came here illegally.' The raids targeted Golden Apple Buffet in Saint Charles and a Saint Peters home; a witness said agents arrested 20 people. '56 year old Galing Yi and Dejang Yi were charged for bringing in and harboring immigrants living here undocumented.' Defendant Galing Yi is also the manager of Golden Apple Buffet in Saint Charles. 'All the charges are about the employer having hired persons who are not legal to work in The United States, having knowingly done it and, in fact, you know, provided them a place to live in and transportation to go back and forth.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tonight, a Saint Charles buffet is shut down after federal agents raided the restaurant and a nearby home. And today we learned two people were charged in connection to this. Justina Cornell joins us from The Newsroom to share details in this case. Justina, Mike and Kelly just twenty four hours ago, a federal grand jury indicted two people from Saint Charles County. Both are charged for bringing in and harboring immigrants who came here illegally.
Now this is after federal agents raided Golden Apple Buffet in Saint Charles and a home about ten minutes away in Saint Peters. Get a drone out with a drone in this video you can see FBI agents armed with guns go inside the Saint Peters home on Park Charles Blvd South Tuesday morning. That's an agent screaming hands up in Spanish. A witness who took this video said agents arrested 20 people. No one answered the door Thursday morning.
Then an hour later, five on your side learned 56 year old Galing Yi and Dejang Yi were charged for bringing in and harboring immigrants living here undocumented. Defendant Galing Yi is also the manager of Golden Apple Buffet in Saint Charles. One witness said a group of employees would come to work in a van and the buffet just had its grand opening in May, but it's now closed. The FBI confirms they were at the restaurant on Tuesday.
Speaker 1: All the charges are about the employer having hired persons who are not legal to work in The United States, having knowingly done it and, in fact, you know, provided them a place to live in and transportation to go back and forth.
reSee.it AI Summary
The New York Times published a piece attacking my family, questioning the danger my newborn faced during a devastating arson that left our home in ruins. I shared security footage showing police rescuing my wife and child as smoke filled their nursery. Despite the evidence, the article downplays the threat we faced. This experience was traumatic, and I quickly moved my family to Florida. I view the Times' actions as a badge of honor, but I will protect my family against defamation. I stand with the Trump Administration for the safety of all American parents.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
The New York Times just wrote a hit piece targeting my wife and children. The angle was that there is no “proof”that my newborn child was in any danger when our home in DC was severely damaged by an arsonist. So I’m posting the proof here… Watch my security cameras capture DC Police Officers using a crowbar to rip my front door open as neighbors scream “There’s a baby inside!” Black smoke from the inferno fills my child’s nursery. Moments later, my terrified wife runs out of the home with our newborn in her arms. We lived in a row house and the house next to us was a total loss. Both their dogs were burned alive in the arson. Our home was rendered completely uninhabitable due to damage from the fire. We had to live in a hotel for months afterwards. This was the worst day of my life. I almost lost everything. I moved my family to Florida swiftly afterwards. In spite of all of this hard evidence and the police reports, The New York Times still does not think my wife or newborn were in danger that day. This is the kind of dehumanizing propaganda that actually gets people killed. From the celebration of the Trump assassination to the refusal to pray for the child victims of the Minneapolis Mass shooting, the Left’s goal is to never grant sympathy to regular Americans, even if they’re innocent children. Evil bastards. You should judge a man by his enemies. I’m proud to have the New York Times work so hard on a hit piece about me. It’s a badge of honor and a rite of passage in this industry, but leave my children and wife out of it. My attorneys have notified the New York Times that we will not suffer defamation or libel against my family. Tread lightly. Florida juries don’t take kindly to New York left-wing political assassins attacking innocent Floridian children. Finally, I’m Proud to fight with the Trump Administration for the security of *every* American parent, no matter your background or politics. You have a right to security in your homeland, and especially in America’s Capital City. Stunningly, there are those who think otherwise. Remember: This is what we’re fighting for 🇺🇸
reSee.it AI Summary
I see a troubling trend where individuals identifying as trans are involved in violent incidents, particularly targeting children. The shooters from various recent tragedies, including those at Annunciation Catholic Church and in Nashville, have been identified as trans or non-binary. This pattern raises serious concerns about radical gender ideology fueling violence. I believe it's time for a national intervention to address this escalating threat and stop making excuses for the behavior.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
One thing is VERY clear: the trans movement is radicalizing the mentally ill into becoming violent terrorists who target children for murder. The pattern is undeniable: Today's Annunciation Catholic Church shooter identified as trans. The Nashville Christian shooter identified as trans. The Lakewood Church shooter identified as trans. The Colorado Springs shooter identified as non binary. The Denver shooter identified as trans. The Aberdeen shooter identified as trans. The Iowa high school shooter was a trans activist. Radical gender ideology is driving violence and targeting innocent people. Enough excuses. Enough denial. The threat is real, and it’s escalating. Time for a national intervention.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨BREAKING: John Bolton angrily stomps his way back home after the 8 hour FBI raid. https://t.co/b8jkguI27P
Video Transcript AI Summary
Live pictures show what we believe is John Bolton returning home. An SUV left his office a short time ago and appears to have made its way with about a thirty minute trip to his home. And there's the ambassador coming up, briefcase in hand, waving to the assembled media. Going inside the front door of the home, it doesn't look like he will talk at this point. But he has chosen to remain silent at this point. Nicole Parker is with us. Nicole, it looks as though this investigation, at least the search of Bolton's home in his office, has wrapped up. What do you expect might be in the boxes that came out at the hands of FBI agents? And where does this go next?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're gonna get back to that in just a second, here's live pictures of what we believe is John Bolton returning home. We had a picture of this SUV leaving his office a short time ago, and now it looks like it's made its way with about thirty minute trip to his home. And there's the ambassador coming up, briefcase in hand, waving to the assembled media. And going inside the front door of the home, we will see it doesn't look like it at this point. If he decides to come out and talk.
I mean, John Bolton does talk to the media an awful lot. But he has chosen to remain silent at this point. Nicole Parker is with us. Nicole, it looks as though this investigation, at least the search of Bolton's home in his office, has wrapped up. What do you expect might be in the boxes that came out at the hands of FBI agents?
And where does this go next?
reSee.it AI Summary
I spent nearly a decade working at Cracker Barrel, a place where tradition and values thrived. Over the years, I witnessed a shift as corporate changes dismantled the essence of this beloved institution. Under new leadership, the focus on modernization led to the loss of our classic menu, relaxed dress codes, and the introduction of alcohol, straying from our family-first roots. The unique decor that told stories was replaced with mass-produced items. The Cracker Barrel I cherished, a true reflection of community and nostalgia, has been replaced by a bland corporate chain.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
EXCLUSIVE: Cracker Barrel Insider Breaks Silence on the Woke Destruction of an American Institution Erik Russell spent nearly 10 years working at Cracker Barrel. He’s done every job in the restaurant. Erik even met his wife there. To Erik, Cracker Barrel was a place where tradition lived and values mattered. But over the past decade, Erik personally witnessed from the inside how corporate sabotage destroyed the Cracker Barrel American institution. Cracker Barrel was founded on Southern hospitality and tradition by a Christian family 1969. Since the original owners passed, company leadership has gone through major changes. Current CEO Julie Felss Masino took over in 2023, beginning an immediate push to modernize and rebrand the company. It began with small changes. The classic brown menus replaced. Uniforms relaxed. Dress codes done away with to pander to “blue haired employees.” Then alcohol was introduced, breaking with decades of staying dry to preserve a family-first atmosphere set up by the original Christian owners. Service and management standards slowly degraded as corporate pushed for expansion into new markets. The food quality changed along with the drive for new “modern” customers. “The logo and store redesign is simply the last step in total brand destruction by corporate vandals who seemed to despise the Cracker Barrel core culture,” says Erik. The logo symbolized a bygone era of front porch values and simpler times — the very spirit that inspired the company’s founding. That logo, like everything else meaningful, has now been sanitized and stripped of its soul. The antiques on the walls once told stories too. Cracker Barrel sent teams across the country to auctions and estate sales to bring back authentic Americana, curating each store like a living museum. Today that process is gone, replaced with mass-produced décor that lacks meaning. What could not be destroyed from the outside was dismantled from within. Longtime employees left, regulars stopped coming, and standards fell. “I felt like I was part of something truly American, full of nostalgia and tradition. Now all of that’s being torn down and replaced with just another bland, soulless corporate chain,” Erik said. His next words stuck with me: “Cracker Barrel built up decades of goodwill across the country. We often referred to ourselves as “America’s front porch” after the iconic long storefront filled with rocking chairs and checkerboards where guests would wait to be seated. Each store I worked in felt slightly different, a reflection of their communities.” According to Erik, the Cracker Barrel he loved, the one so many families cherished, is gone. Erik lived the golden years. He met his wife there. Many coworkers were couples too, bound together by shared values. Regulars came daily, often to the same table, until the day they passed. “Cracker Barrel was more than a restaurant to them, it was home. A place where they felt still belonged, even as the world changed around them.” Follow @rikoruss31
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the Smithsonian should present the true history of slavery, starting with its origins in Africa over 4,700 years ago and the fact that the U.S. and England were among the first to abolish it. Instead, the museum seems to focus on condemning America and white people. I noticed that upon entering, the emphasis is on LGBTQ+ progress, with little regard for slavery. Exhibits also misrepresent Latino history without acknowledging key figures like Fidel Castro. Moreover, there's a lack of context regarding historical immigration issues and criticism of figures like the author of the Star-Spangled Banner.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
The Smithsonian should teach children the REAL history of Slavery: - Slavery originated in Africa over 4,700 years ago - Slavery was exported from Africa to the West - The U.S. and England were the first to abolish it - 7 million people remain enslaved in Africa in 2025 Instead of teaching about the true origins of slavery and America's honorable role in abolishing it 150 years ago, the Smithsonian Museum of American History attacks America and white people as uniquely evil. @JillianMichaels explains: “When you first walk into the Museum of American History, the first thing you see is a gay flag. And it’s all about gay progress, but that’s not about slavery.” “Then they show a Latino history exhibit blaming the U.S. for Cuban immigration issues. No mention of Fidel Castro, the key reason for that immigration. It’s just the white devil who backed Batista. Huge lie of omission.” “They talk about how we’ve always feared non-white immigration, but there’s no mention that historically people hated the Irish, hated the Eastern Europeans, like Italians. Italians were considered non-white immigrants. That’s a matter of fact.” “Even the Star-Spangled Banner is criticized, they go after the guy who wrote it, calling him a ‘huge racist, a slaver and not an abolitionist.’ There’s no balance, no context.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two speakers criticize treating a 'de minimis time in American history' as a tool for power, urging context beyond 'the honorable sacrifices' that ended slavery and 'America and England were the first to end slavery.' They claim, 'Slavery has existed for five thousand years in Africa. Shockingly, it still exists today,' and question why issue ignores slavery in Africa today. They warn that painting 'one race with this brush' fuels racism, arguing, 'The vast majority of white people weren't bad guys and didn't perpetrate evil' and, 'it's 2% of American whites that owned slaves.' They critique Smithsonian displays: 'not for gay pride month' at the Museum of American History; Latino history with Batista/Cuba and 'no mention of Fidel Castro'; gender testing described as 'genitals' and 'cheek swab DNA test'; and 'The Star Spangled Banner' as 'a racist' with the Betsy Ross flag. They conclude there's 'no balance' in the narrative.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On this very short, de minimis time in American history and obsess over it forever, right, and use it for power forever instead of zooming out and looking at, one, the honorable sacrifices that were made by hundreds of thousands of Americans to end slavery, America and England being the first nations to end slavery, and then zooming out on the other side of slavery and looking at the histories of where slavery comes from. We just did that actually on Gronk. Why don't we put it up here? So slavery has existed for five thousand years in Africa. Shockingly, it still exists today, something they ever talk about.
You know, you thought you'd you'd assume if they were this obsessed with it, that they would go out in order to advocate against the 7,000,000 people
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: That are in slavery in Africa today. Like in the current present day, in the year of our Lord, 2025. If this is gonna be your your key marquee issue, something that was solved in America one hundred and fifty years ago through the blood of the patriots of America honorably and nobly. You you'd assume if that was gonna be your deal, you'd like go after the slaves in Africa in the current present day. Like, that would first concern you.
And also, you'd like you'd you'd be concerned that, like, this was a practice that was exported from Africa to the West. And you'd say, well, hold on. Maybe we should go back to the point of origin and solve slavery there. Right? Because it's still currently happening.
But they never wanna have that conversation.
Speaker 1: No. It's just only, like, white people bad. And it's no one's not wanting to take responsibility for this. Nobody is trying to erase what happened. But what's alarming is exactly what you're saying.
When you paint one race with this brush consistently across the board, everywhere from the Smithsonian to CNN, it Yes. Begets, actually begets racial division and racism. And it's funny, I was just talking to Kaizen Esidu, who's who's often on Piers Morgan. I'm a huge fan of his, and I watched a clip of him talking about how when you only talk about white supremacy and you don't talk about any black degeneracy, it begets white degeneracy because white people start to get mad. And it it, Admiral Karola talks about this.
It actually breeds racism
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: Within the white community when you do this. And my my point is simply, nothing good comes from this. So let's have a fair and honest and accurate conversation. Yeah. What I'm really trying to understand though, Benny, is why we need to hold on to this narrative.
I think that's what's the most alarming. Like I saw this post on X to me, and it was, you're denigrating all of humanity, and trivializing these atrocities and horrors of slavery when you say it's just, it was just 2% of American whites that owned slaves. And it's like, because I'm telling you that the vast majority of white people weren't bad guys and didn't perpetrate evil, that denigrates humanity for you? What the hell are we actually trying to say? It's crazy.
Speaker 0: The vast majority is of peoples that were coming to America were coming to America in order to escape some version of serfdom or chattel slavery or indentured servitude, especially, like, when you look at Irish immigration, when you look at the levels
Speaker 1: Hold that up for you. Can I can I run you through some of these things at the Smithsonian? Okay.
Speaker 0: Love that.
Speaker 1: So let let me start with the fact that, first of all, not for gay pride month. When you first walk into the Museum of American History, the first thing you see is a gay flag, and it's all about gay progress, which, listen, as a person in the community, I'm very grateful that we can marry, very grateful we can adopt kids, but it's like, you need to open the front exhibit is like the gays. Like, how about something unifying progress for all Americans? Not about that's not about slavery. So it's like, okay.
What's the next thing that that the administration sent me? They sent me an installation of an exhibit about a Latino history of The United States. So it talks about the history of Latinos immigrating to The US, And in particular, when it comes to Cuba, they talk about how because of the United States government backing Batista for financial gain, we begot this mass exodus from Cubans, and they still suffer from it to this day. There was Batista Escambiak? Yes.
Did the administration at the time do that? Yes. There's no mention of Fidel Castro, who is the key reason for that emigration, who came in in 1959, who was a communist, which we started killing people, jailing people, no mention of that. So it's just the white devil who backed Batista that begot the whole thing. So, yes, we did it, but it's a huge lie of omission to leave that out.
Because that would make it far more balanced portrayal. Right? It goes on and on. Just stop me at any time. It talks about how how we all feared we've always feared nonwhite immigration.
And there's no mention of the fact that historically, people hated the Irish, hated the Eastern Europeans. Like
Speaker 0: Italians Italians were considered non white immigrants. That's like Yeah. That's a that's an absolute matter of fact, by
Speaker 1: the way. Right.
Speaker 0: Like, Okay. Know
Speaker 1: Yeah. Ready for the next one? Then there's the one on gender testing, and they go on to talk about how it was they perpetrated this essential sexual assault by making these athletes show their genitals. And I'm thinking, this is a cheek swab DNA test. Like, what are you talking about?
Like, trying to imply that gender testing isn't fair, and not only that, it's somewhat tied to sexual assault and violation. And and, like, again, not about slavery. And and then it it sort of discusses, like, how it's, bigoted to consider testing for gender in sports. The Star Spangled Banner. They go on to talk about how this guy was, like, a huge racist.
Really? And yeah. Oh oh my god. He was a he was a slaver and not an abolitionist. Okay.
Hold on. Then you've got I mean, I can literally
Speaker 0: keep going. Original Betsy because they had the original Betsy Ross flag. They had the original, like, Betsy Ross and the Star Spangled Ban they had the original Star Spangled
Speaker 1: Banner. Star Spangled Banner So they they go
Speaker 0: after that guy in the exhibit?
Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. They go after him in the exhibit, and they're like, the irony is that you would choose this song from this horrible person. And it's just like, okay. I mean, I I get I like, but where's the part about what it means today?
There's no balance. That's the argument.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my experiences living in DC, where my security camera captured the harsh realities of life, including a mass shooting and my house being set on fire with my family inside. Daily threats, open drug and arms deals, and racial harassment were common. With police defunded, the city became a dangerous place, and I believe DC is a failed state. I feel that home rule has led to entitlement and decay, and I advocate for federal intervention to restore safety and order in the capital.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
My security camera will show you what life was like for a family living in DC: Here’s a mass shooting and murder in my front lawn, followed by my house being set on fire with my wife and infant child inside. These are regular occurrences for DC residents. I lived just a few blocks from the US Capitol. There were open drug deals and arms deals constantly outside my house. My family was threatened on a near daily basis. Racist epitaphs were hurled at my wife and infant children. Rocks were thrown at us as we walked down the street. We were constantly targeted for being white in a “black neighborhood.” No one gave a sh*t. Judges and cops saw us as the problem. When DC Defunded their police, the city turned into a deadly war zone. Every resident was terrorized. DC is a failed state. DC home rule is a mistake. The worst, most entitled racists living off your tax dollars and desecrating our nations Capital. Turning the ‘Seat of Western Civilization’ into a deadly welfare narco-state. Entire neighborhoods need to be cleared out and bulldozed. This can’t happen soon enough. Every American must support Trump federalizing the city and martial law as a point of American Pride. Restore the Seat of Western Civilization 🇺🇸
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
NANCY PELOSI: “We are hoping that we can have gender-affirming care for our trans kids.” Openly calling for child mutilation. https://t.co/nzVupohHhW
Video Transcript AI Summary
"that is something that I'm working for at at at the national level, and we have can I say, are hoping that we can have gender affirming care for our for our trans kids? And that it's it's it's a sad thing for us." "I'm not totally I don't know what I don't know what effect we can have nationally with what we have going on in the White House and in the congress." "It's really very sad if you were there." "Outside our door, we have a trans flag." "Outside of our door in the cap in the office Congressional Office Building, we have the trans flag as do some of our other colleagues." "But that view is not necessarily"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How is your office responding to the pauses in gender affirming care here in California?
Speaker 1: Well, that is something that I'm working for at at at the national level, and we have can I say, are hoping that we can have gender affirming care for our for our trans kids? And that it's it's it's a it's a sad thing for us. I'm not totally I don't know what I don't know what effect we can have nationally with what we have going on in the White House and in the congress. It's really very sad if you were there. Outside our door, we have a trans flag.
Outside of our door in the cap in the office Congressional Office Building, we have the trans flag as do some of our other colleagues. But that view is not necessarily
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨BREAKING: President Trump signs executive order banning banks from de-banking Americans over their political or religious beliefs. https://t.co/APolNnsdtM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been in hiding since the mob attack in Cincinnati, and this is my first message on camera. Through tears, I want to thank everyone for their love and support; it’s what keeps me going and has restored my faith in humanity. It’s been incredibly hard, and I’m still recovering from severe brain trauma. I’m grateful for the $160,000 raised to help with my medical bills, legal fees, and lost wages. This is how we fight darkness. Thank you all, and God bless you.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Holly has been in hiding since the vicious mob attack in Cincinnati. This is her first message on camera. Through the tears: “I want to say thank you to everyone for all of the love and support. It's definitely what's keeping me going. And you have just brought back faith in humanity.” “It's been very, very hard, and I'm still recovering. I still have a very bad brain trauma.” “God bless you all. Thank you.” By the grace of God, we have changed Holly’s life. Thanks to your generosity we have raised $160,000 to help cover Holly’s medical bills, legal fees, and lost wages. This is how we fight darkness. This is America 🇺🇸 Please share and give if you can: https://www.givesendgo.com/SupportHolly
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses gratitude for the love, support, prayers, and blessings received. They state that this support is keeping them going and restoring their faith in humanity. They thank everyone for what they are doing for them and their family during a very difficult time, noting they are still recovering from a severe brain trauma.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just want to say thank you so much to everyone for all of the love and support. It is very humbling that you have sent your prayers, your blessings. It's definitely what's keeping me going. And you have just brought back faith and humanity. So God bless you all and thank you.
I appreciate everything that you're doing for me and my family. It's been very, very hard and I'm still recovering. I still have a very bad brain trauma. And it's Thank you. Thank you, everyone.
reSee.it AI Summary
I observe a stark contrast in media coverage and public reaction to violent acts based on the race of the perpetrators and victims. If young white teens attacked elderly black couples, the outrage would be immense, leading to widespread protests and legal changes. However, when black teens commit similar acts against white couples, there seems to be a silence. This disparity feels deeply unjust and fuels a growing mistrust in society. I believe those responsible for such violence should face severe consequences, and I appreciate the attention the Trump Administration is giving to this issue.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
If a mob of young white teens hunted down elderly black couples at a country music fest to beat to death while the crowd cheered... The media would explode. Politicians would rage. Cities would burn. New laws would be passed. Every criminal trial televised. But when black teens do it to white couples in Cincinnati? Media silence. This is evil. Racial. Demonic. Animalistic. This is how we get a zero trust society. Every one of these thugs must be ID’d, arrested, and thrown in prison. Ruin their lives forever. Those who filmed and cheered them on must be charged as accessories. Destroy them. Thank God the Trump Administration is taking this very seriously...
Video Transcript AI Summary
A hypothetical scenario is presented involving young white men attacking elderly black couples at a country music festival while others cheer and film. The speaker states this would be wrong and those involved should be brought to justice.
The speaker then claims that the races are reversed in a real incident at a Cincinnati jazz festival, where young black teens allegedly targeted and brutally beat middle-aged white couples. The speaker describes the videos as horrifically violent, showing a woman being knocked unconscious. The speaker encourages viewers to find the videos on social media. The speaker characterizes the alleged attack as animalistic and evil and claims President Trump's administration is taking it very seriously.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's say, hypothetically, there was a group of young white men that were roaming through a country music festival to find elderly and middle aged black couples to beat them senseless within an inch of their lives, and the reaction of every other white person standing around was to cheer them on and to film it, to upload the videos. That would, of course, be wrong. You would disavow it, and so would I. Be hideous. And I would want those people brought to justice.
Of course, there would be a lot of national news stories. Every individual involved, every person that ever uploaded or cheered for this would have their lives destroyed, and rightfully so. So why is it okay when the races are reversed? Well, you know the answer to that question. Because we live in a post George Floyd world where the corporate media still believes it's naughty to point out what is clearly obvious to us, which is that there are some parts of our country that are a zero trust society, and white people are targeted.
And this just happened in Cincinnati. I'm not gonna show you the videos because they're horrifically violent. You can find them on social media. If you have the guts, I encourage you to go watch them. But let me describe them to you here accurately.
A group of young black teens roam through a jazz festival in Cincinnati and target the rare white couple, middle aged white couples that can't defend themselves in the dark of night, and they get brutally beaten, including a woman who gets knocked totally unconscious. Looks like she was dead for a considerable while by a young man who looks her straight in the face and just knocks her out, beating a woman in the street. It's animalistic. It's evil. It deserves to be called out by everyone.
Thank God, president Trump and his administration are taking this very seriously.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
General Motors CEO virtue signaling how “clean” the new Chevy Volt is. Then a reporter asks where the charging electricity comes from. Oh my…. Wait for it. Awkward. https://t.co/wcMNhHVSK9
Video Transcript AI Summary
The battery in this electric vehicle design is a t-shape, located down the center and across the back seat area. The vehicle is currently charging from the building's power grid. The power source feeding the building is Lansing. The power mix is believed to include coal, with a heavy reliance on natural gas. The grid is approximately 95% coal.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. The battery in this particular design is a t shape right down the center and across the back seat area. Because everybody thought we killed the electric vehicle. No, we didn't. It's alive and well.
Speaker 1: What's charging the batteries right now? What where where's what's the source of Well,
Speaker 0: It's it's coming from the building.
Speaker 1: I mean, are is it what's our mix of power?
Speaker 0: Oh, actually, Lansing feeds the building.
Speaker 1: What's that?
Speaker 0: Lansing feeds power to the building. So I don't I don't know I bet you there are a bit of coal. Oh, they're heavy on natural gas, aren't
Speaker 1: they? Right now the car is charging off of your grid.
Speaker 2: Right. It would be charging off our grid, is nine about 95% coal.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Eric Swalwell had sex with a Chinese spy. Her name was Fang Fang. She fundraised for him and placed staff in his DC office. Eric Swalwell is still on the ‘Foreign Affairs’ committee. Then Eric crapped himself on live TV. Hope this helps. https://t.co/NKCXoigU0n
Video Transcript AI Summary
Eric Swalwell allegedly had a relationship with a Chinese spy named Fang Fang, who fundraised for his campaign and donated money to him. Fang Fang reportedly placed staff in Swalwell's office before fleeing the country after being discovered. Separately, Eric Swalwell was recorded grabbing himself on live television. The speaker contrasts this with accusations that the president used taxpayer dollars to solicit the Ukrainians' help to cheat in an election.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Eric Swalwell had sex with a Chinese spy. Her name was Fang Fang. She fundraised for his campaign and donated money to him. Then she fled the country when she was found out. She even placed staff in Eric Swallow's office, but nothing ever happened to Eric Swallow.
Then Eric Swalwell grabbed himself on live TV. Did that the president use taxpayer dollars to ask the Ukrainians to help him cheat an election? That's Eric Swalwell.
reSee.it AI Summary
I demand that Trump's DOJ investigate Jim Comey, James Clapper, and John Brennan for their alleged conspiracy against President Trump in 2017. Pam Bondi should act immediately to preserve all relevant texts and emails, including classified information. If they refuse to disclose what Obama directed them to do, we will hold them in contempt and pursue prison sentences. I particularly urge that Jim Clapper be brought in, as I believe he will start revealing everything, knowing he is in a precarious position. This situation is serious.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: General Flynn demands Trump’s DOJ immediately investigate Jim Comey, James Clapper and John Brennan for orchestrating a 2017 conspiracy against President Trump, ‘They will spill their guts’: “Pam Bondi should immediately put them under investigation. Save all texts and emails.. Pull it all up.. All classified information. You don’t want to say what Obama directed you to do? We will hold you in contempt, you will go to prison.” “Especially bring in Jim Clapper. I guarantee he will start spilling his guts. Clapper knows that he’s screwed. Do it to Brennan, Comey and others. This is so bad.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, available evidence suggests Comer, Clapper, and Brennan lied to Trump and committed treason. The speaker recalls Devin Nunez briefing Trump in March 2017 about the Russia investigation being "bullshit," before Mueller was appointed. The speaker claims Paul Ryan and Mike Pence were disloyal and wanted Trump out, hoping he would step down after the "pussy tapes" emerged in 2016.
The speaker believes Trump must decide who to hold accountable, asserting the President is the chief law enforcement officer. The speaker suggests Trump consult with his national security team and that Pam Bondi should immediately put Brennan, Clapper, and Comey under investigation, seize their communications, and investigate their classified activities. The speaker suggests that Jim Clapper should be brought in for questioning without a lawyer and predicts he will start "spilling his guts."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In your capacity as a military man, what should happen to these key players, Comer, Clapper
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: And Brennan? Because now according not to your book, not to me, not to not to blogs, right, or to tweets, but according to the director of the CIA and a phalanx of analysts who've been tasked and worked on this for months, and also the John Durham report, if you wanna use that as an appendix to this, according to all of the available evidence, they lied to Trump's face. They actively usurped presidential power. They committed treason, general. Am I wrong?
Speaker 1: So in in March 2020 I'm sorry. Let me get the the date right. March 2017. This is very important. I talk about this.
March 2017 was of I'm I'm out of the White House. So Trump let me go because, you know, it was a it a it was a you know, whatever. I mean, I I described that in detail too. I mean, Mike Pence I go after Mike Pence in the book quite a bit, actually, because Mike Pence, it to me is a you know, talk about a traitorous or disloyalty, at least disloyalty. But in March 2017, there was a a briefing to the I think it's the gang, what they call the gang of eight.
And, and in that briefing, this is right this is from Devin Nunez. I talk a little bit about this. So Devin remember when Devin Nunez went over to the White House and talked to president Trump, and then he came out of the White House, and he was, like, berated by the media. And Paul Ryan, speaker of the house at the time, then put then suspended, Devin Nunez from being the chair of the intel community for, like, eight months. It was like a long time.
People tend to forget that. So Paul Ryan, speaker of the house republican, suspends republican Devin Nunez, you know, as the chair of the intel committee because committee in the house because he went over to the to the White House in March and told the president, hey. This is we just got briefed. The gang of eight just got briefed. It's all bullshit.
It's all bullshit. This is even before, Mueller was even appointed. This is before Mueller's appointed. So what they began to do is they began and and this is when they run after Devin Nunez. So the the Nancy Pelosi smear campaign, the tactics of this, the entire intel community's leadership.
During now Trump is in, but he doesn't Trump doesn't really know yet. He know he does he's not a way he doesn't know the way of the world of Washington DC at that time. Now he does. Now he does. So that's another that's another piece of evidence that that we all we all now know, but we knew then too.
And so my
Speaker 0: Paul Ryan Paul Ryan. You're saying Paul Ryan and Mike Pence at least were in on this?
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. There's no doubt there's no doubt about it. Paul Ryan and Mike Pence wanted Trump out when the during the very famous prior to the election in 2016, the pussy tapes. Okay? I'll just I'll say it like that.
Sorry. But the but that infamous, tapes, came out. I know at that time that there was discussions between Ryan, Reince Reince Priebus, and Mike Pence about, well, if Trump steps down, then we're gonna have a plan, and we're gonna we're gonna know? Because they actually wanted they were hopeful because that that tape didn't come out through democrat operatives. Okay?
So there was a plan for you know, hopefully, Trump's gonna step down and go screw this. You guys can have it. Those guys were ready to step right in. K? This is 2016.
So all the people out there that think, you know, all these guys are great because they're republicans, sorry. They're not. This is where the uni party steps in, and the uni party is one of these big problems that we face in this country because they don't wanna accept that we are in the midst of a revolution, know, and and a Marxist takeover. And Barack Obama I mean, there's no reason in the world why Barack Obama should have ever won the first time around, but he did because there was a push by a lot of people because they knew this was the opportunity that they had to start this turnover of our country. K?
Eight years of Barack, eight years of Hillary, we'd be done. So now here's where we at are at today on your show, you know, here in America with with this, you know, bill that's about to be to to happen, and and Trump has got a, you know, Trump has got a lot a lot of authority. Right? A lot of leadership authority that he's been given by the judgment of the American people, by the majority of the American people, way our country is supposed to be run. And in that judgment, he's gonna have to make a decision.
This is this is kinda where I keep saying enough is enough. He's gonna have to make a decision about how and who to hold accountable.
Speaker 0: Yes.
Speaker 1: And he's gonna have to turn I want people to remember that the chief law enforcement officer in the country is not the attorney general. It's not the attorney general. The chief law enforcement in the country is the president of The United States. We always say, you know, he's the president, and he's the commander in chief. He's also the chief law enforcement officer in the country.
He's the only one with pardon authority at that level. Right? And he and he can he can, you know, declare things based on national security and national emergency issues alone. So he can decide which direction the country goes, and he does it because the the majority of the judgment of the American people were imbued into his ability to be able to do that. That's where we are.
So Trump is gonna have to sit there with his team. Tulsi Gabbard, you know, Pete Hagstad, Marco Rubio, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, sort of his national security team and probably grab, pull in a few others and sit there and go, okay. What do we do here, folks? Because we can't have we can't have reports like this come out and and and nothing happened. Right?
John Brennan I'll tell you what so one thing, and I called for it I called for it yesterday. Pam Bondi should immediately and she should tell the American people. She should immediately put John Brennan, Jim Clapper, and and, and, Jim Comey under investigation as a minimum. Put them under and tell the American people, the Department of Justice has made the decision, and we have coordinated with the White House. K.
The president of The United States is aware, and he has given us the authority to go ahead and do this to put these gentlemen under investigation. And to tell them, just like like I was told or Trump was told, save all your text messages, save all of your emails, save all of your phone conversations, because we're gonna go pull it all up. And guess what we're also gonna do? We're gonna do some things in the classified side. We're gonna use the national security apparatus that we do have in the Department of Justice, and we are going because they just appointed a new national security division czar in the in the Department of Justice.
We're gonna pull all the classified texts. Okay? We're gonna pull it all. We are gonna look into every bit of it because believe me, they did a lot of stuff on what's called, you know, the the the the classified work environment, CWE or JWICS. Right?
Joint Worldwide Intelligence Command and Control System. I mean, these are classified highly classified systems where a lot of the communications was had. Alright? And, also, any communications you have with your with, you know, with the president and, you know, because C Bannon. Right?
C Bannon and Pete Navarro went to jail. They went to prison because of the protection of executive privilege. They went to jail over it. Alright. So you wanna you don't wanna say what Barack Obama directed you to do?
Then we're gonna hold you in contempt, and you're gonna go to prison. Believe me. And I've said this in the past, and I don't know whether I said it on your show. The very first guy that if I was the attorney general, I would immediately go bring in Jim Clapper. I go get Jim Clapper, and I'd bring him in.
And guess what? For national security purposes, you don't even need to bring a lawyer. Don't have to have a lawyer. Ask a lot of the j sixers. Okay?
And you bring him in and you and I can guarantee on the way from his house to wherever you're gonna question him and make it a long ride. Right? Make it a long ride. I guarantee Jim Clapper will start spilling his guts because Jim Clapper knows that he's screwed, and he can't play the, well, I got partial dementia like uncle Joe did because I'm old. No.
No. No. No. I'm sorry, buddy. You know?
Do it to Jim Comey. Do it to John Brennan. Do it to some of the others that are around this this whole thing, Benny. This is this is so bad.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨WATCH: Fake News CNN cuts the feed right as Tulsi Gabbard begins exposing how far the Obama administration went to fabricate the Russia-gate hoax. https://t.co/rWTff0fLeV
reSee.it AI Summary
I have some big news: AG Pam Bondi announced she will meet with Ghislaine Maxwell to uncover the truth about Jeffrey Epstein. This is an unprecedented move as Bondi aims to identify uncharged third parties and gather more evidence regarding Epstein's child trafficking operation. Additionally, she has requested further disclosures from the FBI and DOJ. I communicated with Maxwell's counsel to see if she would be willing to speak with prosecutors, and I anticipate our meeting in the coming days, marking a significant change in the government's approach.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
BIG NEWS: AG Pam Bondi just announced she is meeting with Ghislane Maxwell to expose the truth about Jeffery Epstein. A truly unprecedented move. Bondi seeks to find ‘uncharged third parties’ and further evidence of Epstein’s child trafficking operation. Bondi has also ordered further disclosure from the FBI and DOJ. Wow. ‘Therefore, at the direction of Attorney General Bondi, I have communicated with counsel for Ms. Maxwell to determine whether she would be willing to speak with prosecutors from the Department. I anticipate meeting with Ms. Maxwell in the coming days. Until now, no administration on behalf of the Department had inquired about her willingness to meet with the government. That changes now’
reSee.it AI Summary
I see Trump comparing the Epstein List to other Deep State hoaxes. The irony is that we only know about the hoaxes like Russiagate and Hunter's laptop because we questioned the official narratives and uncovered real evidence. By pushing for transparency, we revealed the truth. I believe we can approach the 'Epstein hoax' in the same way—by demanding full disclosure and trusting the American people to handle the information.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Trump compares the Epstein List to various Deep State hoaxes. OK, but the irony here is that we only know Russiagate, Hunter's laptop, J6 etc. are hoaxes BECAUSE we asked questions, investigated and released real, incriminating evidence. We refused to believe the "official" story because something was wrong. We kept pushing and finally broke the truth. This is how we can solve the 'Epstein hoax' as well. Release everything, full disclosure, chips fall where they may. Trust the American people.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that releasing all the Epstein evidence, like with the Steele dossier and Hunter Biden's laptop, could expose hoaxes and illusions created by intelligence agencies. They emphasize that uncovering the truth about past scandals required investigation, evidence release, and legal processes, citing the Durham investigation into the Steele dossier as an example. The speaker suggests that releasing all information, including text messages, helped reveal the true nature of events, and that Trump's logic implies everything should be released. However, they agree with Trump that releasing everything without context or due diligence could unfairly harm innocent individuals, such as Epstein's gardener, whose names might be included. The speaker does not favor destroying the lives of innocent people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump saying and he says it again that the Epstein list is a hoax. You know, we got the Steele dossier, and we got the evidence for the intel agents lying. If anything, releasing all of the Epstein evidence would prove perhaps that things are fake or things were created or there was a illusion that was presented by the intel agencies that were operating him. You know, the only reason that we know the only reason we know that Hunter Biden's laptop so it says here, Steele dossier, Lying 51 intelligence agency, laptop from hell, which Dems swore came from Russia. No.
It came from Hunter's bathroom. And even Russia, Russia, Russia scam itself is totally fake and made up. Correct. True. And we have railed until our voice broke on those issues on this program.
And there were an evil visited upon president Trump. They were all lies. They were presented as truth. And the only way to discern that they were not true was to investigate, to ask questions and to put a shoulder to the wheel and to start to really hammer against them. And slowly through the course of disclosures in Congress, the release of evidence, subpoenas, trials, jury findings, you're able to discern that, yes, all of these things are hoaxes.
It took enormous it took special prosecutors, in fact, to discern the true nature of the Seal dossier. John Durham spent five freaking years looking into the Seal dossier in order to, like, determine what its true fundraising sources were, and that was the Clinton campaign lying. And in one of the great one of the greater injustices of my lifetime having to pay a $100,000 fine for lying about creating that document. Now we'll see if they're going to pay even further, James Comey, John Brennan, and so on being wrapped up in what is called a grand criminal conspiracy by the FBI that is currently ongoing. We talked about it on the program a couple days ago.
There's been no new news on that. We'll see. But my point to the president respectfully is the only way we know that all those are fake and that that's all garbage is that the federal is that eventually we got all of the information or at least enough of it in order to discern that. None of us just believed it based on vibes. None of us just like thought it was all fake.
Of course, we thought it was fake or made up, but it really helped cement it to release all the evidence. It really helped cement it when people just played ball and we got the text messages. Is Trump really gonna win? Remember that? It's like burning the back of my brain.
Lisa Page to Peter Strzok. Is Trump really gonna win? No, we'll stop it. We've never seen our FBI talk like that. And they released the evidence.
They didn't want to, but they released the evidence and it really showed us the true nature of what was going on there. Good. You know, good. So, like, by Trump's own logic here, we should be releasing everything, which I think would be a great pressure release valve for all of this. Now here's where, of course, I will be siding with Trump, and I we have been consistent on this issue since day one of this conversation is you like, Jeffrey Epstein did have a gardener.
He has somebody who cut his grass. Right? Or or or or, like, cleaned his house? Probably in his address book. Some, like, working class dude in his sixties who, by no fault of his own, was, like, hired to trim the hedges.
And, like, do you want that guy's name, like, dragged through and and tortured through in all this, you know, and everybody looking him up? I well, I mean, I believe that that would be reckless. I do. I don't like that, actually. And so, like, what president Trump is saying is technically right in that when you release if you just released all if you just released everything without any context or explanation or due diligence by the feds, then there would definitely be some people that would be totally destroyed in this who don't deserve that.
And I am not in favor of innocent people having their lives destroyed.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the Clintons are in full-blown panic. I’m calling for Ghislaine Maxwell to testify before Congress and reveal the names on Epstein’s client list. She knows the business inside and out and has made all the arrangements. Clinton visited the island multiple times.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨Roger Stone says the Clintons are in full-blown panic as he calls for Ghislaine Maxwell to testify to Congress and reveal the names on Epstein’s client list: “She made all the arrangements and knows the business inside and out. I’d love to see her testify. Clinton was on the island multiple times.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ghislaine Maxwell allegedly trolled bus and train stations for children to traffic for Epstein and made all the arrangements for him. She was charged with conspiracy to engage in child sex trafficking, but no other conspirators were identified. The same US attorney handled the Epstein, Maxwell, and Diddy cases.
Trump flew with his wife and daughter to Palm Beach once and back the next day. Virginia Jaffrey testified that Trump was only in Epstein's home once for a charity event and acted like a perfect gentleman.
Some Epstein victims stated they didn't know Trump, but some had stories about Bill Clinton, including one who said Clinton liked them young. Some victims witnessed Clinton on the island, leering and lurking in mysterious rooms. Jaffrey said Clinton was talking to two 16-year-olds flown in for his entertainment. Clinton was on Epstein's plane and island multiple times and borrowed Epstein's jet to pick up a check for the Clinton Global Initiative from a known pedophile.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is Ghislain Maxwell in the seat of honor at the Clinton wedding? The only one. Bill Clinton has a sole daughter. Why is she sitting there leering at this wedding? Please unpack this relationship.
Speaker 1: Well, she was, of course, Epstein's pimp. She was in charge of trolling the bus stations and the train stations looking for, you know, children who had no parents or who were estranged from their parents. They're the easiest children to to kidnap and traffic. She was making all the arrangements for him. I think she knew his business inside and out.
She, again, by the Biden administration, she was charged with conspiracy to engage in child sex trafficking, but yet again in her case, no other conspirators are identified. The the US attorney who handled the Epstein case and the Maxwell case and the p Diddy case, another cover up, all the all the same people. This is Damian Williams, the democrat US attorney in the Southern District Of New York, and Maureen Comey, who just happens to be the daughter of one of the great orchestrators of the Russian collusion hoax, who himself, I suspect, will be facing charges very shortly, James Comey, the former FBI director. So I I would really love to see Maxwell testify. I think we would learn a lot.
But what we learn is going to exonerate president Trump. I'm sick of this claim. Oh, Trump is in the files. I've seen the files. Yes.
It's absolutely true. On one occasion, Donald Trump and his wife, Marla Maples, and his daughter, Tiffany, flew from from New York City, actually, Teterboro in New Jersey, to Palm Beach on a Friday and flew back on a Saturday. That proves what? We have the testimony both written and in a six hour interview I did with Virginia Jaffrey who said that Trump was only in Epstein's home once, so that was for a public event, for a charity event, and he acted like a perfect gentleman.
Speaker 0: There was some deposition material that was released approximately one year ago eighteen months ago from some of the Epstein victims. And they were asked constantly about president Trump, and none of them even knew him or ever saw him. And this is, like, available in the documents. Anybody can go see him. But they were also asked about Bill Clinton, and many of them had stories about Bill, including one that says Bill Clinton liked him young directly from Jeffrey Epstein.
Some of the other victims say that they witnessed personally Bill Clinton on the island, that they witnessed personally Bill Clinton leering and lurking about the island in mysterious rooms. These are the direct witness testimonies. These these documents are public, Roger. I mean, nobody has to you know, you you don't have there's no illusion here. They're in black and white, and they're from the court.
Why is Bill Clinton never been brought in by federal investigators to answer questions about this?
Speaker 1: No. You make a very a very good point. Virginia Jaffrey, who was Virginia Roberts at that time. And I agree with you having I interviewed her for six hours for my book, The Clinton's War on Women. I read every word of her lawsuit and her sworn testimony.
She most definitely did not kill herself. But she says very specifically that that Bill Clinton was talking to these two 16 year olds who had been flown in especially for his entertainment when she was told she had to leave the public event to have sex with somebody who who Epstein was compelling her to have sex with. She also writes in her notes that it was always being filmed. So, yeah, I think Bill Clinton I mean, given his track record, what do you think he was doing there? And why would he was on the plane multiple times.
He's on the island multiple times. He even borrows Epstein's jet to fly to Asia to pick up a multimillion dollar check for the cult go Clinton Global Initiative from a guy who is a publicly known pedophile. It's all in my book, the Clinton's war on women.
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed ZeroHedge discussing Epstein's connections to intelligence and the so-called Clinton body count during a White House press briefing. President Trump shared a video about this topic, mentioning the suspicious death of Mark Middleton, a former aide, found on Clinton Foundation property, raising questions about the circumstances. Additionally, I inquired about the missing links to intelligence agencies in the first phase of the Epstein files and asked when we can expect the second phase to be released.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
ZeroHedge just raised Epstein’s intel ties and the Clinton body count in the White House press briefing room: "President Trump posted a video highlighting what most people call the Clinton body count.. The death of Mark Middleton, who was a former Clinton White House aide, was found dead on a Clinton Foundation property.. Maybe you can enlighten us as to how that was actually a suicide." "You've released phase one of the Epstein files... What was missing from that is any connection to his ties to intelligence agencies... For phase two, when can we expect it?
Video Transcript AI Summary
A video posted by President Trump highlights what some call the "Clinton body count," referring to suicides in Clinton circles. One example cited is Mark Middleton, a former Clinton White House aide found dead on Clinton Foundation property, having apparently shot himself in the chest with a shotgun and hung himself from a tree.
A question is posed about Jeffrey Epstein's suicide, and the missing connection to intelligence agencies in the released phase one of the Epstein files. The speaker claims the whole story involves trafficking young girls on behalf of intelligence agencies, potentially as part of a blackmail ring with ties to the Israeli government. The questioner asks when phase two will be released and if it will contain information pertaining to those aspects of the Epstein case. The response refers the questioner to the Department of Justice on the timeline, but assures that the attorney general has kept her promises in the past.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another question for you is, so over the weekend, President Trump posted through social a video highlighting what most people call the Clinton body count, is the strange number of suicides that seem to happen in Clinton circles. I have a headline here from the Washington Post that said Trump peddles false conspiracy theories tying the Clintons to several deaths. So I just wanted to highlight real quick. This wasn't in Trump's video, but this is from the Arkansas Times. And it's the death of Mark Middleton, was a former Clinton White House aide, who was found dead on a Clinton Foundation property.
And I'll just quote from the Arkansas Times. Middleton apparently shot himself in the chest with a shotgun and also hung himself from a tree with an extension cord. Cord. So I have no idea how somebody commits suicide that way, but if the Washington Post is here, maybe you can enlighten us as to how that was actually a suicide. So anyways, that's just a lead into my question about the most famous Clinton related suicide, which is that of Jeffrey Epstein.
There's still a lot of questions around that case. You've released phase one of the Epstein files. What was missing from that is any connection to his ties to intelligence agencies, and that's really the whole story, that not just trafficking young girls but doing it on behalf of intelligence agencies and even potentially, as part of a blackmail ring with potential ties to the Israeli government. So, for phase two, when can we expect it? Will it have information pertaining to those aspects of the Epstein case?
Speaker 1: I know the attorney general has committed to releasing those files. I would defer you to the Department of Justice on her timeline. But, when she has made a promise in the past, she has kept it and I'm I'm certain that she will in this case as well. Rachel. Thanks so much,
Speaker 0: Kara.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Flashback to 2020 when Communist California tried to shut down the 4th of July. Patriots didn’t listen. 🇺🇸 https://t.co/xtvbyXCty7
Video Transcript AI Summary
Local fire and police departments have asked people not to set off fireworks, but many are ignoring these requests. Warnings have been posted on social media stating that even "safe and sane" fireworks are banned in most LA County cities, including the city of LA. Public fireworks shows have been canceled, leading to more people setting off illegal fireworks. Fines for illegal fireworks can be as high as $50,000.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The past ten minutes, fifteen minutes or so, and there are massive fireworks going off pretty much in every direction that you see here. Jasmine, our local fire departments and police departments have been begging people not to do this. Right. But it seems tonight they are not listening to those calls.
Speaker 1: Well, they're they're putting up new warnings on social media. I mean, they're saying safe and sane are even banned in the majority of cities in LA County, not to mention the city of LA has a ban as well. We know many of the public shows have been canceled, so we've done stories on this. More people have been unfortunately setting off illegal fireworks. I mean, it is quite the site, but this is not supposed to be happening.
I mean, you could be fined up to $50,000.
Speaker 0: Well
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨BREAKING: Idaho shooter found dead, per Kootenai County Sheriff. https://t.co/ePUBts44j8
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
AOC built her entire political brand on being a “Girl from the Bronx.” But is that true? No. It’s a lie. I travelled to AOC’s actual hometown to investigate. It’s safe, clean, patriotic and wealthy. It’s a slice of small town American heaven. Here’s where AOC is really from… https://t.co/C7THiyyDsO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker visits Yorktown Heights, where AOC grew up, contrasting it with the "gritty" Bronx, which AOC claims as her background. AOC repeatedly identifies as being "from the Bronx," which the speaker suggests is a lie, as she spent her childhood in Yorktown Heights, a clean, safe, and affluent suburb. The speaker highlights the town's patriotic displays, parks, and farmers markets, questioning how someone could become a communist growing up there.
The speaker interviews residents, including one who knew AOC in high school and described her as "mean." The speaker visits AOC's childhood home, valued at approximately $500,000, and speaks with neighbors who remember her. Another resident claims that the mainstream media paints a false picture and that communist values are not present in Yorktown. The speaker questions why AOC is ashamed of her true identity and doesn't embrace her suburban roots.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yo. What's up, Welcome to The Bronx. This is where AOC says she's from. And this is where AOC is actually from. Welcome to Yorktown, the business hamlet of Yorktown Heights.
There's mansions everywhere. It's beautiful, it's green, it's pristine, it's clean. They even have a Christopher Columbus society. I thought AOC got all those statues ripped down. Some structural racism right here in AOC's hometown.
Today, we're gonna investigate the biggest lie in all of politics, the fraud of AOC. Let's go. This is The Bronx. The Bronx is a gritty, working class, hardscrabble historic borough of New York City. AOC is a communist who represents The Bronx in congress.
She's not just a rising star in the Democrat party. She is the Democrat party. Clearly preparing for a 2028 run, AOC is breaking fundraising records and filling stadiums to hype her Bronx girl persona.
Speaker 1: I'm a girl from The Bronx.
Speaker 0: AOC won her seat in congress in 2018 by attacking her establishment Democrat opponent as not being sufficiently from The Bronx.
Speaker 1: That a Democrat who takes corporate money, doesn't live here, doesn't send his kids to our schools, doesn't drink our water, cannot possibly represent us.
Speaker 0: AOC reflexively repeats that she's from The Bronx and a Bronx girl.
Speaker 1: I speak like a girl from the block.
Speaker 0: And again.
Speaker 1: I grew up first generation in The Bronx. And again. Girls from The Bronx are welcome everywhere.
Speaker 0: So often that it's almost a pathology. In fact, AOC just pulled the Bronx girl card again this week responding to president Trump saying she would eat a queen's boy like Donald Trump for breakfast.
Speaker 1: I don't think he knows how to deal with a girl from The Bronx.
Speaker 0: Something's very wrong here. What functional adult repeats where they're from this often? Someone who's lying. And here's the dirty little secret, AOC is not actually from The Bronx. Since AOC was an infant, her family has lived in a beautiful little hamlet called Yorktown Heights.
This little town is the opposite of AOC's gritty, downtrodden, working class persona. It's clean and beautiful and safe. The neighborhood that AOC grew up in is well off, leafy and manicured. AOC went to elementary, middle, and high school here. She graduated from Yorktown High, where she went by the name Sandy Cortez.
And then she graduated Boston University with an economics degree. Since AOC is about to run for president, we thought it would be important to investigate the town that gave America its most famous communist. This is not the Bronx. As you can see here, this is the leafy, beautiful Parkway suburbs. Is that a golf course?
Oh, it's gorgeous. What a pleasant and wonderful drive. I I feel like I'm on my way to Pleasantville. Very much looking forward to finding out where AOC is from. After a ninety minute drive from New York City, we finally got to Yorktown Heights.
Check out this beautiful entry to the city. Trees lining the road, some mansions, beautifully manicured lawns, American flags. This looks like an awesome place to be from. You get out of the car and you find something like this. Welcome to the capitalist horrors of AOC's Yorktown Heights Patriot State Park.
You can see here a veterans memorial Circle that's been beautifully tended and groomed with a lot of American flags and a lot of honor for our great nation. Really, just a terrifying place to grow up here. I hear that there are miles of luscious trails going through the forest here. Boy, you can understand why you'd become a communist growing up in a hood like this. Capitalist swine trying to sell me rhubarb at this beautiful Meadows Farm, farmers market that like you can just smell it.
They just want my money, my capitalist dollars. I'm not gonna let them do it because I'm an angry Marxist. Right? This is what black pills someone like AOC. Right?
The fresh pies, the fresh fruit and vegetables. You know? Could you imagine growing up like this? Hell on earth. Have they ever tried to apologize to AOC?
Look at that. No trash, no graffiti, yellow school buses, disgusting. Okay? So safe, so clean. AOC grew up here, now you can understand.
Okay? You can understand where the radicalization comes from. It's too nice. Look at that beautiful that that flagpole right there just makes your blood boil. Let's see what new horrors await us around the corner.
This is where AOC got the idea for the Green New Deal. That's what we'd all be driving in if AOC got her way. Do you understand? She grew up with a horse and buggy. That's what she wants us to go back to.
Get it? You gotta think like her. So depressing with my made from scratch cinnamon rolls, my ice cream. Thank you. What a terrible life.
I hate capitalism. I'm so angry. This is hell. We must destroy America and capitalism. Oh, don't worry.
There's a secret adorable patio that we missed. A luscious Green Oasis Hamlet back here that we we happened to miss while we were rage eating our ice cream. Look how beautiful this is. Yo. What's up, man?
How you doing? We got subscribers in AOC's hometown. Look at this. Look at this beautiful park. Got American flags here.
What a patriotic beautiful town. We got revolutionary war battles that were fought here. You can see up here freaking straight out of the Patriot. They even got the axe, and the American flags are sponsored by veterans. What a beautiful place.
This is like a paradise. This is an American Hamlet. And it's worth noting that AOC didn't just live here as like a little kid or whatever. She was here before she could talk or walk. She was here as an infant, she moved here, and then went to high school here.
She graduated and went to Boston University, a very prestigious university. Then she decided that she was gonna sign up for communist central casting. Makes you wonder. Yorktown police. Nice.
Look at that. Not defunded there. You ever seen a Starbucks like this? This is beautiful. Amazing thing just happened.
Firefighter comes up to us and says, I know AOC. I knew her from high school. And she was mean. She was like a bully. Of course, she's from here.
She was raised here. Everybody knew her. Everybody knows her, and he doesn't know what the hell happened to her. He said she was like hanging out in his house all the time. What happened?
What happened? Who hurt you? AOC, who hurt you? Maybe he was her boyfriend. Welcome to the beautiful Yorktown stage where AOC learned to be a theater kid, came in handy later in life.
Having to sell you a life of oppression. Right? They got Jekyll and Hyde coming up in September based on AOC. Nothing says true oppression like growing up next to a massive pickleball court at scale. Okay?
Gotta shut this place down. Rumor has it, this is where AOC really found herself, really got in touch with her roots, the Mexican tequila bar in this beautiful clean, happy safe town. After a very pleasant afternoon in Yorktown Heights, we realized we must be missing something. Time to head over to AOC's childhood home. This is AOC's hood.
You might get a untrimmed hedge here and there. A lawn gnome might jump out at you. This is AOC's straight that she grew up on. In fact, AOC's childhood home is appraised at close to $500,000 right now. And across the street, a Trump yard sign.
Speaker 2: Trump 2024.
Speaker 0: It's AOC's house. We were even able to speak with some of AOC's neighbors that remember her all the way back when she moved into the house as a little girl. Boy, did we hear some stories. What an incredible place to be from. And while we were filming our outro for this video, a man honked his horn and jumped out of his car wearing a MAGA hat.
And guess what? He's a subscriber and he knows AOC. It's beautiful here.
Speaker 2: Yeah. It's absolutely beautiful here. And AOC obviously was a a resident and went to the high school that I went to as well.
Speaker 0: So For a long time. She was here for, like, she was here for close to twenty years.
Speaker 2: Yes. Absolutely. Everyone knows that Yeah. In this town.
Speaker 0: People around here like Trump?
Speaker 2: Absolutely. They do. A lot of people are quiet about it because they're afraid to lose friends, but I'm not afraid to lose friends for what's right. Absolutely.
Speaker 0: What's your message to president Trump?
Speaker 2: Oh, we love you. Just keep going. Finish the job. Go for the Federal Reserve, baby. Come on.
Speaker 0: Maybe you can explain. This seems we've we've been here for two hours. We've been walking around. It's beautiful. It's patriotic.
There's like flag American flags on every street. How could you become such a dirty communist growing up here?
Speaker 1: If it walks like a duck and it talks like a duck, maybe it's a duck. How's it possible?
Speaker 2: I don't know. I don't think it is. I think it's fake. I think the mainstream media paints a different story than what you if you interview anyone who's on the street, I don't think those values are present at all. Yeah.
Speaker 0: There's not a lot of communist No.
Speaker 2: Absolutely not. It's fake. Yeah. Fake news. He's been saying it since 17, man.
That's it.
Speaker 0: Identity politics is the foundation of left wing coded ideology. Demanding that the world accept your identity is paramount. So why is AOC ashamed of her identity, of where she came from?
Speaker 1: And we asked what does it mean to be two working class women showing up to the Met?
Speaker 0: She never talks about Yorktown Heights, and I can't figure it out. Be true to yourself. Come out of the closet and embrace your white, leafy, suburban roots. Set an example for all these little kids living in safe, peaceful, low crime, clean communities like the one you come from. We see you.
You matter. Your identity is respected. AOC, you could literally save lives or at least a couple of science projects. But to do that, AOC would have to admit that her entire political life, she's been fighting against herself. And that would be the toughest battle of all.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨BREAKING: Idaho sheriff sends a clear message: if anyone sees the shooter targeting firefighters and have a clean shot, take them out. https://t.co/vPKWqHxPdu
Video Transcript AI Summary
The church has stated that if anyone gets a clear shot at the shooter or shooters, they should take them out. This will make it very difficult for law enforcement to determine who is in their sights, as there may be innocent people. The situation in the Coeur D'Alene, Idaho area is very fluid and active, around the Canfield Mountain area.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, people in that area need to be very careful because, the church has also said that if anybody gets a clear shot at the shooter or shooters, that they should take them out. And this is gonna make it very difficult for law enforcement to try to determine who is in their sights. Maybe there are some innocent people, and they certainly don't wanna take innocent individuals out. But this is a very fluid active situation there in the Coeur D'Alene, Idaho area. And by the way, Molly, I've been in that area.
This is right around the Canfield Mountain area there.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
THROWBACK: Tucker Carlson on Dancing With The Stars https://t.co/fCDOWE7HWy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Political journalist Tucker Carlson and professional partner Elena Grinyenko performed the cha cha cha on "Dancing With The Stars." Carlson joked his dance experience was limited to rehearsal dinners. Grinyenko, a Britain champion, aimed to guide Carlson through the performance.
Carlson admitted to being more nervous dancing than in Beirut, but he expressed confidence, even considering himself a "Cha Cha master."
After the performance, judge Carrie Ann Inaba said Carlson looked like he had the most fun, but noted he didn't dance for half the number. Bruno Tonioli called the performance "an awful mess." The pair received a total score of 12 out of 30. Carlson joked that Bruno rattled him more than Hezbollah, but vowed to win him over. Viewers were encouraged to vote to keep them on the show.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back to Dancing With The Stars. Next, he has braved some of the most perilous situations in the world, but now his most intimidating assignment, dancing the cha cha cha on national television. It's political journalist Tucker Carlson and his professional partner Elena Grenyenko.
Speaker 1: My name is Tucker Carlson. I'm a journalist. I wrote for magazines and newspapers for about ten years, and I've been in television news for about six. There are some unknown number of Israeli forces in the hundreds, maybe the thousands. When I first got the call about doing this, I thought, they must be calling the wrong guy.
My dance experience consists of drinking too much at a couple rehearsal dinners.
Speaker 2: It's all about the wedding performance, baby.
Speaker 3: My name is Liliana Grinyanka, and I'm current Britain champion. I'm a dance floor, hot, sexy, and most of all, very feminine.
Speaker 1: Tucker Carlson.
Speaker 3: Liliana, nice to
Speaker 2: meet you.
Speaker 4: Nice to
Speaker 2: meet you.
Speaker 5: I will
Speaker 1: be more nervous dancing than I was in Beirut.
Speaker 4: Cha cha. One, cha cha, two, cha.
Speaker 3: When it comes to Tucker in natural ability for dancing,
Speaker 2: Back. Back. Oh, back. And
Speaker 3: that's why I have to take a little bit softer approach so he can just go for it and have fun. Come on. Listen up. Let's do that.
Speaker 4: Let's be kidding.
Speaker 1: I'm listening up. I can do that.
Speaker 3: Two and three. See, that was a good one. Oh.
Speaker 2: I'm starting to like the cha cha.
Speaker 1: The key I've decided to this whole enterprise is don't think. This is a physical thing.
Speaker 3: Two, that's a good one.
Speaker 1: I have total confidence. I think of myself as a Cha Cha master.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Okay. Good. So show me that. If I'll be able to get him through a show one, that'd be great.
If I could get him through a couple of shows, that'd be just amazing.
Speaker 1: What I wanna achieve? Victory. Victory in. Let's dance.
Speaker 6: Dancing the cha cha cha, Tucker Carlson and his partner Elena Grinyenko.
Speaker 0: Alright, Doug. Very nice Elena.
Speaker 2: Thank Very nice to meet over here. Alright.
Speaker 0: Love the way you built the anticipation America wondering, is he gonna get up?
Speaker 2: I can't I can't believe I just did that. You did great. I loved it, actually. Well, like
Speaker 0: I had fun. Carrie Anne, do you agree?
Speaker 2: Uh-oh. I know. So like it anyway.
Speaker 4: That you had so much fun. So far, you look like you had the best time on the dance floor,
Speaker 7: and I love it. That's the best part. All I
Speaker 2: have to
Speaker 7: say is the dance competition and you didn't dance for half
Speaker 4: the numbers so I can't really give you a good score on that one. I'm sorry
Speaker 7: but I'm glad
Speaker 4: you had a great time.
Speaker 2: Thank you. Well, the
Speaker 5: best part was the start. All the problems started as soon as you stood up. But let me tell you, I think you are a natural ballroom dancer. I think the Wolves, Fox Rock, Quick Step, and Tango are gonna be your dancer.
Speaker 2: I bet.
Speaker 5: I'll get back next week for that crickety Quick Step.
Speaker 2: Okay, Bruno. What an awful mess. And what you spend half a day and team look like you were sitting in a toilet. I'm sorry. That was dreadful.
Bruno. A mess. No. No. No.
No. No. That was that's kind of an artful put down. Let's have a good guess. To to.
Why you spend that little bit time with the Lou? I don't know. I don't understand it. You're like Okay.
Speaker 0: Alright.
Speaker 2: Why is that?
Speaker 0: Alright. This is
Speaker 2: a cha cha cha.
Speaker 0: After the break, we'll come back to the sequin crossfire and find out how Tucker and Elena scored with the judges. And then get ready as we starve the Disney Channel movie, High School Musical graduates from the classroom to our ballroom live. Welcome back. Okay. Before the break, Tucker Carlson performed a cha cha that Bruno, in his inimitable way, said, he's a mess.
Let's see how they scored it.
Speaker 6: The judges have their scores. Carrie Anninabe.
Speaker 2: Five.
Speaker 6: Len Goodman. Four. Bruno Tonioli.
Speaker 2: An awful mess. Three.
Speaker 4: Well, a total of 12 with a little extra thrown in there from Bruno. Now I know that, obviously, he had a sort of the rat a tat tat of Bruno's rapid fire, but, you know, you're used to dangerous war zones. So, certainly, this has gotta be a piece of cake for you.
Speaker 1: Rattled me more than Hezbollah, honestly.
Speaker 2: But I enjoyed it much more. And you know what? I'm gonna win Bruno over.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's gonna take some time. But I feel like I feel like the seeds of affection are there. And once he kinda marinates me a little bit, we'll
Speaker 2: be friends.
Speaker 4: Alright. Bruno, turn on your oven. There you go. We'll ready to bake. Alright.
12 out of 30 for Tucker and Elena. Of course, if you wanna help survive tomorrow night's elimination, then call the number on your screen to vote because you got the power to keep them right here. Tom.
Speaker 0: Alright.
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe what I'm hearing. Minnesota Police were on the scene as Vance Boelter murdered Rep. Hortman in her home. They saw him in a Halloween mask and fake police uniform, engaged him briefly, and then just watched as he entered the house and killed her and her husband. Afterward, he escaped out the back. This is beyond comprehension. The police didn’t intervene, and it’s incredibly disturbing. Nothing about this situation makes sense.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
This is insane. We now learn that Minnesota Police just stood by and watched as Vance Boelter murdered Rep. Hortman in her home. What. How is this possible? Minnesota Law Enforcement Officials just reported that that two Minnesota Police officers were already on the scene *watching* before killer Vance Boelter ever stepped inside Rep. Hortman's house. They saw the killer in the driveway wearing a halloween mask and fake police uniform and engaged him. Then after a short firefight the Police sat and WATCHED as Boelter entered the home, killed the Rep. and her husband and then the police let him escape out the back. All of this after Senator Hoffman was already reported gunned down. The police didn’t stop him. This is obscene. Again, Minnesota Police stood by, let Boelter commit the murders, and escaped out the back. WHAT!? Nothing here makes sense. Dark and disturbing...
Video Transcript AI Summary
Belter, dressed as a police officer with a tactical vest, body armor, and a hyper-realistic mask, approached Representative Hortman's home armed and carrying a flashlight. Brooklyn Park police arrived to check on the Hortmans after learning of Senator Hoffman's shooting.
Upon arrival, they saw Belter's SUV with flashing emergency lights. Belter drew his weapon and began firing, rushing into the house, where he murdered Representative Hortman and her husband, Mark. Police fired at Belter as he entered the home, but he escaped out the back.
Officers recovered Belter's Beretta, body armor, and mask. A search of his car revealed five more firearms, including assault-style rifles, and a large quantity of ammunition. Belter also had notebooks listing over 45 Minnesota state and federal elected officials, including Representative Orkman. Belter researched his victims, found their addresses and family names, surveilled their homes, and took notes. He concealed himself as a police officer, outfitting his SUV with police lights and a license plate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Belter approached representative Hortman's home, again dressed as a police officer, wearing the tactical vest and body armor, and wearing that hyper realistic mask. He was armed and carrying a flashlight. Before he entered the home, two Brooklyn Park police officers arrived at the scene. They too had dispatched been dispatched to check on senator and representative Hortman after learning of the shooting of senator Hoffman. Hoffman.
When they arrived at the scene, they saw Belter's black SUV parked in the driveway with the emergency lights flashing, and they saw Belter standing in front of the house several feet from the door. When Belter saw the officers get out of the car, he drew his weapon and began firing. He rushed into the house through the front door, firing into it. He repeatedly fired into the house. And when he entered, he murdered representative Portman and her husband, Mark.
The Brooklyn Park police officers fired at belt belt no. Belter as he rushed into the home, but he escaped into the home and out the back. Officers recovered Belter's nine millimeter Beretta along with the body armor and the mask behind the home along his path of flight when he fled on foot. They later searched Belter's car where they found five more firearms, including assault style rifles and a large quantity of ammunition. Belter also had in his card notebooks containing the list of more than 45 Minnesota state and federal elected officials, including representative Orkman.
Now Belter planned his attack carefully. He researched his fam his victims and their families. He used the Internet and other tools to find their addresses and names, the names of the family members. He conducted surveillance of their homes and took notes about the location of their homes. He also prepared in other ways.
He concealed himself as a police officer, outfitting his black SUV with police lights and a police license plate, wearing a black tactical vest and body armor, carrying a police flashlight, and a handgun. And, of course, he wore that hyper realistic silicone mask as seen on the surveillance videos. The video of his arrival and shooting of senator Hoffman is truly chilling. Again, it's no exaggeration to say this is the stuff of nightmares.