reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @benwehrman

Saved - September 16, 2026 at 12:43 AM

@benwehrman - Ben Wehrman

Cancer: The Forbidden Cures (FULL DOCUMENTARY) https://t.co/pMLzlgA4WR

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript argues that cancer rates and outcomes have worsened over time and that cancer care has become a large, expensive system centered on conventional therapies that remain poorly understood and often limited in benefit. It states that “twenty thousand people die of cancer every day,” totaling “eight million deaths every year,” including “half a million” Americans. It claims that cancer incidence has risen from “one person out of twenty” at the beginning of the last century to “one person out of three” today, with “over one million Americans” diagnosed annually. It describes patients facing “medical tests, examinations, second opinions, medications… surgical operations… support therapies and follow-up checks,” while the “cancer medical apparatus” is portrayed as so large and costly that it “needs” patients to survive. The transcript says cancer treatment is a major business: it claims the typical patient spends at least “$50,000,” and with “one million” new American patients yearly this equals “$50,000,000,000 annually spent.” It says modern oncology has advanced like “jets” and “fiber optics,” but “the apparent incapacity of medical science to understand and conquer” cancer has not changed. It presents “official theory” as molecular theory: cancer is described as “a group of over 100 diseases characterized by abnormal uncontrolled cell growth,” where cancer cells can form tumors (neoplasms) and deaths are linked to metastasis, defined as malignant cells entering circulation and establishing colonies elsewhere. It also says this molecular theory is “basically the same” as formulated “more than fifty years ago,” and asserts that “no one has been able to prove that the official theory is the correct one.” The transcript discusses proposed genomic approaches, claiming that advanced labs work on “the human genome” to identify genes responsible for cancer types, with an expectation of personalized cures tailored to each patient. It then contrasts this dream with statements that mechanisms triggering malignant growth are still not completely understood and that statistics “seem only to get worse.” It states conventional therapy has a “one in three chance of living for five years” after diagnosis using “surgery, radiation, [and] chemotherapy drugs,” and claims “two out of three American cancer patients will be dead before five years.” It asserts that conventional oncology imposes only those three therapies and adds that “two of the three are actually carcinogenic.” The transcript outlines risks and side effects of radiation and chemotherapy: radiation is said to cause dangerous side effects and “can actually cause cancer,” remaining “controversial.” Chemotherapy is described as killing cancer cells throughout the body but also healthy cells, being “highly toxic.” It claims chemotherapy causes fatigue, sickness risk, taste changes, sore mouth, and “hair loss,” and says many chemotherapy drugs are “carcinogenic” and require strict handling and incineration. It further claims “chemo brain” involves memory and concentration changes for women treated for breast cancer, with effects said to last “for years.” It also quotes a study claiming chemotherapy benefits “at most five percent, one out of twenty,” and asks why alternative approaches are not investigated. A major theme is alleged industry capture of medicine: it claims pharmaceutical interests gained control of teaching systems, worked with the AMA to exclude other practitioners, influenced licensing, and shaped research funding and data control. It describes clinical research being pulled from NIH and universities into “for profit research organizations,” giving drug companies “complete control” over study design, data access, and publication. It concludes that doctors must cure patients using information they can only get from the pharmaceutical industry, which “can no longer be verified.” The transcript then presents extended narratives of natural or alternative cancer remedies being opposed by mainstream medicine. It tells the story of Renee (Green) Case/Essiac: a Canadian nurse who learned a cancer remedy based on herbs and later treated large numbers of patients, with claims of cures and growing popularity. It describes legal challenges in 1938, petitions, and rejection by a cancer commission, followed by authorities harassing her and repeated efforts to test the remedy. It claims Asiac/Esiac was later studied at a laboratory connected to Doctor Charles Brush (described as President Kennedy’s personal physician) and that results did not lead to FDA approval. It also says later legal attempts by patients failed and that her remedy remained unapproved. Next it describes Harry Hoxie and the “Hoxie Method” from Texas: it claims he offered herbal cancer treatment, built clinics across states, and faced repeated arrests and pressure from the FDA and medical authorities. It alleges that legal battles and media campaigns escalated the conflict, including claims that Hoxie ultimately won judgment against Dr. Morris Fishbein and the AMA. It further says federal prosecutors did not prove worthlessness but the treatment was outlawed on technicalities. It ends by claiming the treatment shifted to Mexico and cannot legally be shipped to the United States, requiring travel and personal-use limits. The transcript describes Maximilian Gerson and Gerson therapy: it claims Gerson therapy aims for “complete detoxification” via intestinal washes using “organic coffee” and a strict raw fruits/vegetables diet while avoiding meat. It asserts Gerson’s early dietary results included migraine elimination and skin tuberculosis resolution, and later claims that Gerson testified to the U.S. Senate in 1946 with cancer patient recoveries. It claims he was ostracized and banned from publication in the United States, and says a clinic later operated in Mexico after his death, with records available. It includes a TV doctor response denying curing terminally ill patients and providing counterexamples from a personal account where pancreatic cancer reportedly resolved after therapy and ongoing follow-up. The transcript also mentions other alternative theories: new German medicine (psychological trauma leading to specific tumors), vitamin B17/Laetrile (called “Laotrel”), shark cartilage, and mistletoe (Iscador). It claims various institutions refused to evaluate or approved status was denied, and provides specific statements about mistletoe evidence review and a celebrity testimony about using Iscador. It concludes with a discussion of Doctor Tulio Simoncini and a fungus-centered theory: it claims tumors appear white due to fungi, and that he treats cancer with sodium bicarbonate delivered directly to tumor sites to kill fungal components. It includes a medical case example of a patient with lung metastases allegedly disappearing after bicarbonate cycles. It describes Simoncini facing disbarment, media smear campaigns, court actions, and prison time, while claiming continuing anecdotal support.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Twenty thousand people die of cancer every day. This translates to eight million deaths every year, half a million of which are Americans. At the beginning of the last century, one person out of twenty would get cancer. In the 1940s, it was one out of every sixteen people. In the 1970s, one person out of ten. Today, one person out of three gets cancer in the course of their life. Over one million Americans are diagnosed with a new cancer every year. All these people suddenly plunge into a dark that will dramatically change their life for many years to come. Faced with an apparently endless chain of medical tests, examinations, second opinions, medications, new tests, surgical operations, support therapies and follow-up checks. They find themselves at the complete mercy of the disease. While in that tunnel, each patient feeds an immense medical apparatus that employs hundreds of thousands of people and generates millions and millions of dollars for the medical and pharmaceutical industries. From research laboratories to medical schools, from prevention clinics to worldwide drug sales. Today, the cancer medical apparatus is so large and expensive that it needs its patients in order to survive just as much as the patients need the apparatus. Speaker 1: Cancer is a big business, one of the biggest businesses. The typical cancer patient spends at least $50,000 to treat his or her disease. With one million new American cancer patients every year, that translates to $50,000,000,000 annually spent on cancer treatment in The United States. Speaker 0: But to modern oncology cancer still remains a mystery. What a century ago were just wooden contraptions able to lift only a few feet off the ground today have become sophisticated jets capable of reaching incredible heights at three times the speed of sound. What a century ago was the creaking sound of the telegraph over some rustling wires today has become a global network of fiber optics where millions of people a way to way make from the comfort of our home. To The only thing that has not changed in the last hundred years is the apparent incapacity of medical science to understand and conquer a disease like cancer. Why? The official theory maintains that cancer is a problem that originates in the human cell. Speaker 2: Cancer is a group of over 100 diseases characterized by abnormal uncontrolled cell growth. Speaker 3: Cancer is a sometimes fatal disease caused by the abnormal growth and division of cells. While normal cells have well defined walls and nuclei, the uncontrolled growth in cancer cells causes creation of abnormal, unstructured masses of tissue known as neoplasms or tumors. Speaker 2: Most cancer related deaths are due to metastasis, malignant cells that penetrate into the circulatory system and establish colonies in other parts of the body. Speaker 4: How and where the migrating cells stop is different for different cancer types. Once the tumor cells are no longer moving they can begin the process of forming a new tumor by leaving the blood vessel and beginning to reproduce in the new location. If the new environment is suitable, the newly arrived cell will begin to grow and a new tumor will develop. Speaker 0: This official theory, also called molecular theory, is basically the same that was formulated more than fifty years ago. Speaker 5: Cancer begins as a departure from normal cell growth that is harmful and unceasing. If the abnormal cells grow slowly in a limited area, they are called benign tumors. If the cells are spread to other parts of the body, they constitute a malignant tumor, one that is cancerous. Cells of malignant growths break off and travel through the bloodstream to other parts of the body. There, they may start new cancerous growths. Speaker 0: In the last fifty years, the search for the cause of cancer within the human cell has been pushed beyond the limits of anyone's imagination. Today, the most advanced laboratories are working directly on the human genome in order to identify the genes that seem to be responsible, according to some scientists, for the different kinds of cancer. This opens the door to a dreamlike scenario for the pharmaceutical industry. A world where each patient would need its own personal cure tailored to its own personal needs. One million new patients every year, one million new cures for each and every one of them. Speaker 6: What we want to do is we want to match the disease with the cure or palliative treatment, whatever it is, by using the genomic tools. That's really what the whole cancer world is now going to be about for a very long time. Speaker 7: The question of whether we are going to break the cure barrier is not a question about if, it's a question about when. Speaker 0: In the meantime however, no one has been able to prove that the official theory is the correct one and that the origin of cancer is in fact of genetic nature. Speaker 3: Major advances being made in the detection, prevention and treatment of cancer. But the mechanisms that trigger malignant cell growth are still not completely understood. Speaker 0: In the meantime, statistics seem only to get worse. Speaker 1: We've lost the war on cancer. Since the 1950s, the outlook for most cancer patients has remained the same: a one in three chance of living for five years after diagnosis using conventional therapy: surgery, radiation, chemotherapy drugs. The fact is that today two out of three American cancer patients will be dead before five years. Despite such dismal results, official oncology continues to impose on patients the only three therapies that have ever been authorized in the last hundred years: Speaker 0: surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. And two of the three are actually carcinogenic. Speaker 8: Surgery is the oldest technique and the most successful of the three, but surgery is useful only when the cancer is localized, a minority of cases. Patients also fear radiation's dangerous side effects. One of these is that radiation can actually cause cancer. The use of radiation remains controversial even in medical circles. Speaker 9: As much as we could work with her, say on a math problem, she was not comprehending it. Speaker 10: It would take a long time to get like a worksheet done. Speaker 9: Parts of Elizabeth's brain were, weren't there anymore because of the radiation that had killed that part of the brain. So the part of the brain that was responsible for memory was gone. Speaker 8: Chemotherapy is designed to kill cancer cells throughout the body. It is highly toxic, however, and it also kills healthy cells. Today chemotherapy is often given in combination with surgery and radiation. Speaker 11: Your typical chemotherapy agent will certainly cause tiredness. There is a risk of sickness, but there are very good anti sickness drugs these days that can control that. Chemotherapy frequently causes taste change. It can cause a sore mouth. The first side effect that many people ask about however is hair loss. Speaker 0: In fact many chemotherapy drugs are carcinogenic. Their toxicity is so high that all personnel handling them must observe very strict safety rules. Their disposal calls for total destruction and incineration of anything that comes in contact with them. Some of these drugs remain partially toxic even after incineration beyond 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit. But there is something new about chemotherapy that's been emerging of late. Speaker 8: Many women who undergo chemotherapy for breast cancer describe unsettling changes to their memory and concentration. Researchers at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center say this phenomenon is very real. Speaker 12: Women have complained of cognitive changes that have occurred during the time that they've been treated for breast cancer for a long time now. And the term chemo brain has been coined and this is used to describe loss of concentration, difficulty remembering things, having difficulty thinking clearly and not being able to function effectively in normal activities that the person was able to do perfectly well before they had treatment. Speaker 13: Simple little things I would have to wait to think of something and it would be frustrating. Speaker 14: X is red, C is green. Speaker 13: Researchers say the chemotherapy creates memory problems that can last for years. Speaker 0: Children are also beginning to report long term effects of chemotherapy drugs. Speaker 10: Things like my homework, like let's say math homework. When it's really noisy I can't focus. It just makes me feel like my mind's being erased. Speaker 0: But is there any benefit in chemotherapy? Speaker 1: John Cairns of Harvard University published a study in Scientific American. He found that chemotherapy drugs benefit at most five percent, one out of twenty of the cancer patients they're given to. Speaker 8: If conventional therapy has such limited results, why isn't the medical profession willing to investigate alternative approaches? Speaker 0: The answer to this question may be found in some historic events that took place almost a century ago when official medicine finally managed to gain the upper hand on the so called empirical doctors who cured patients with herbs and natural remedies. Speaker 8: In the eighteen hundred's society sanctioned both approaches to healing. Patients had a choice of using either doctors called allopaths or natural healers called empirics or homeopaths. The two groups waged a bitter philosophical debate. The allopathic doctors called their approach heroic medicine. They believed the physician must aggressively drive disease from the body. They based their practice on what they considered scientific theory. The allopaths used three main techniques. They bled the body to drain out the bad humors. They gave huge doses of toxic minerals like mercury and lead to displace the original disease. They also used surgery, but it was a brutal procedure before anesthesia and infection control. Few patients were willing to have surgery. Most patients feared allopathic methods altogether. Satirists of the day remarked that with allopathic treatment the patient died of the cure. Competing with the doctors were the empiric healers. Contrary to the doctors, they believed in stimulating the body's own defenses to heal itself. Instead of poisonous minerals, they used vegetable products and non toxic substances in small quantities. They especially favored herbs learned from Native American and old European traditions. The empirics said they based their remedies not on theory, but on observation and experience. Satirists of the day added that with empiric treatment the patient died of the disease, not the cure, and the balance of medical power remained equal until the turn of the century. Then new medical treatments emerged that were potentially very profitable. The AMA joined with strong financial forces to transform medicine into an industry. The fortunes of Carnegie, Morgan, and Rockefeller financed surgery, radiation, and synthetic drugs. They were to become the economic foundations of the new medical economy. Speaker 15: The takeover of the medical industry was accomplished by a takeover of the medical schools. Well, the people that we're talking about, Rockefeller and Carnegie in particular, came to the picture and said, we will put up money. They offered tremendous amounts of money to the schools that would agree to cooperate with them. The donors said to the schools, we're giving you all this money. Now, would it be too much to ask if we could put some of our people on your board of directors to see that our money is being spent wisely? Almost overnight, all of the major universities received large grants from these sources and also accepted one, two, or three of these people that I mentioned on their board of directors. And the schools literally were taken over by the financial interests that put up the money. Now, what happened as a result of that is that the schools did receive an infusion of money. They were able to build new buildings. They were able to add expensive equipment to their laboratories. They were able to hire top notch teachers. But at the same time as doing that, they skewed the whole thing in the direction of pharmaceutical drugs. That was the efficiency in philanthropy. The doctors from that point forward in history would be taught pharmaceutical drugs. All of the great teaching institutions in America were captured by the pharmaceutical interests in this fashion. And it's amazing how little money it really took to do it. Speaker 8: Surgery became viable with anesthesia and infection control. And doctors advocated expensive radical operations. These in turn produced the need for a large lucrative hospital system. Radium fever swept medicine. The price of radium rose 1000% almost overnight. Another costly technological industry entered the hospital system. A drug industry grew out of the booming patent medicine business. The doctors changed educational standards and licensing regulations to exclude the empirics. Soon only AMA approved doctors could legally practice medicine. In a brief twenty years, the AMA came to dominate medical practice. Organized medicine launched a media campaign to associate the empirics with quacks. The code word for competition was quackery. Speaker 15: So now the average doctor goes through school, he gets a great education, he has to be really smart to get through it, He learns all about drugs. He doesn't know too much about basic nutrition. I found that the average wife of these physicians knows more about nutrition than he does. But they sure know their drugs. And if you go to your typical doctor today, I don't care what it is, chances are you're going to walk out of there with a prescription. Why? Because that's what he has been trained to do. Speaker 16: The companies that make up the pharmaceutical industry are among the largest corporations in the world. Together, these businesses have come to be known as big pharma. In 2004, their combined global sales were over $500,000,000,000, with Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson leading the pack. In The US, the core of big pharma's immense profits is from sales of prescription medication. And since these drugs can only be prescribed by medical professionals, most of the industry's promotional and marketing activities are directed at doctors, pharmacists and other health care providers. Speaker 17: This starts out at the first day of medical school. And in many medical schools, even the incoming students that are two years away from seeing a patient will start to get gifts from the pharmaceutical industry. And as these students get farther along in their medical education the interactions and the gifts escalate to free lunches, to dinners. Speaker 18: Champagne, brunches, happy hours, New York Jet tickets. No matter where you spend the money, you make money. And my boss always told me, don't worry about it. There's there'll always be more funding. Spend what you can. In fact, if I give you a $100,000 to spend, Gene, I want you to spend $200,000 Speaker 19: Before 1980, most clinical research was funded by the National Institutes of Health. During the 90s, most of that research got pulled out of universities and was brought to for profit research organizations. The problem is that that gave virtual complete control over the research to the drug companies. They could design the studies. They have control of the data so that many of the authors of the most important articles published in our best journals aren't even allowed to see their own data, they don't get free access to their own data, and they have control over publication. Speaker 0: To sum it all up, the pharmaceutical industry first gained control of the teaching system. Then it gave the AMA the power to exclude all other doctors from practicing. Then it took over the entire drug testing process while heavily influencing the medical publications that reviewed those drugs. And finally, Big Pharma extended its control over the federal entity that is supposed to verify those drugs' safety and efficacy. At the opposite end are the sick citizens and in the middle are the doctors who must cure them based on information they can only get from the pharmaceutical industry which can no longer be verified. Chemotherapy drugs are in fact among the most expensive of all. A one month supply of Erlotinib, a chemotherapy drug produced by Roche, costs $2,300 The same supply of Sorofenib, Bayer's chemotherapy drug costs $5,500 The monthly supply of Sunitinib, a chemotherapy drug produced by Pfizer, costs almost $7,000 Speaker 20: The drug industry is the most successful global industry in the world. What they don't want you to do is get better. Because if you get better, their market's gone. Speaker 21: And affliction and deployed all too often by those intent on inflicting control over the masses. Speaker 22: Fear preys on the most vulnerable among us. Fear sells, and nowhere is fear peddled more shamelessly than in the fields of medicine and human nutrition. Speaker 21: Fear anesthetizes us. It coerces us, making us believe that we can do little on our own to prevent or treat disease and forces whole nations to kneel at the altars of the drug industry. Speaker 22: And, of course, the fearmongers are also preying on fear of disease. And the solution that the fearmongers give us are drugs. Speaker 21: As if by design, health choices are limited, information is scarce, lives are ruined, and the truth be damned. The fear machine is well oiled by petrochemical dollars and a near worldwide monopoly in health care. It works overtime to prevent the truth about dietary supplements from getting out to the public. Speaker 15: Anything that comes from nature cannot be patented. They're not interested in that. So, we translate that into the real world of FDA approval. Surely, drug companies aren't gonna spend $20,000,000 or more testing any substance from nature because it can't be patented. That and of course, the FDA says it's illegal to use unless it's been tested for efficacy and safety. Now, you see the the catch 22 you're in there. Nothing from nature, regardless of how effective it might be, will ever be proven safe or effective according to the FDA. It'll never be. Because nobody's going to spend the money to go through the test. So, therefore, everything from nature will always be condemned by the FDA as unproven. An unproven cancer cure. Speaker 23: In a small town in Northern Ontario, the year 1922, Green Case first learned of a cancer remedy which she termed Esiac. Speaker 0: Unbeknownst to history, this fragile Canadian nurse has heroically managed to cure thousands of people from cancer with a simple concoction of herbs. While nursing an old patient, Renee noticed that she had a scar on her breast. The patient said it was leftover from a cancer she had cured over thirty years before using a mixture of herbs suggested by the medicine man from the local Ojibbe tribe. Renee tried the same formula on her aunt who had recently been diagnosed with cancer. Speaker 14: I went down and I asked Doctor. R. O. Fisher who later was Dean of the University of Toronto if he would watch over her if I would try some of these herbs. And he said he would. And it it took quite a while, but she got better. And she lived for twenty one years. Speaker 0: After that successful experience Renee quit the hospital and began curing people with mixture of herbs that would become known as Asiac, which is her last name spelled backwards. Soon the voice spread and the number of patients healed from cancer started to multiply. Speaker 24: In about 1943 I was diagnosed in Toronto General Hospital as having a growth in the bowel which was inoperable. And that was in January. And my husband was told that when the snow was gone, I would probably be gone with it. So through friends, I was directed to miss Case. And I came to her and had treatments from her for practically three years and felt I was cured and I've had no return of it since. Speaker 14: Doctor. Aro Bistida of Bracebridge sent me a patient, a cancer of Speaker 5: the bowel, Bert Rosin, Speaker 14: and, I cured him. So Doctor. Bastida went before the town council and mayor and persuaded them to give me a building that had they had taken for a taxes as a clinic that I had made a great discovery and that I should be supported in my own hometown. So they set up the clinic where I treated for eight and a half years. Speaker 0: In a few months the clinic was fervent with activity with patients flocking in from all different places. Speaker 13: Her clinic would be full every time we were there. There were people came in ambulances who were not able to come in for a treatment. She would have to go out and administer the medicine out in the ambulance. Then as the time went on, you we watched these people be able to walk in. And, finally, they were driving their own car to get SCI. Speaker 14: I treated from 300 to 600 patients a week. And, I the only way they would allow me to do this was free of charge and I had to have a doctor's diagnosis for every case I treated. Speaker 25: So we brought the diagnosis, the nurse case, and I took treatment from her every week for about a year, and I have no cancer today. Speaker 0: It was one Doctor. Leonardo from Buffalo who had immediately recognized the potential of Renee's cancer cure to warn her of what was waiting ahead. Speaker 14: Doctor. Leonardo, he was a cancer surgeon and he said, Do you think you have a cure for cancer? I said, I'm way beyond thinking I know. Then he, had five other doctors in examining patients and he asked if he could go in with them and examine patients and I told them he could. So then he told me, he said, you have it but the medical profession will never let you do this to us. Speaker 0: After a while, a mysterious group of entrepreneurs showed up, offering Renee $1,000,000 secret formula. But she flatly refused as they would not guarantee that her cure would be made available for free to anyone who ever needed it. Speaker 23: Greene Case was called before the legislature in 1938 to determine Essiac's legal status. Speaker 14: I was trying to legalize my treatment and the patients went out and got this petition signed, 55,000 names on it. Right before the legislature, lost out by three votes. Public Speaker 23: outcry forced the establishment of a cancer commission to investigate herbal remedies. The greatest majority of Reen's evidence was rejected. Speaker 14: You see, they said the doctors all made mistaken diagnosis. That that's why the patients thought they were cured. I kept on my clinic as long as I could until they stopped the doctors from giving a diagnosis and then I had to stop. And it's a sad thing when somebody comes and they have somebody that is ill with cancer and the medical profession can do nothing for them and they beg of me to treat them. It's Speaker 5: a very, Speaker 14: very sad thing to turn them away. And I had a nervous breakdown over that, so I really had to stop. I don't see how they can reframe from recognizing it because if you have the proof, you diagnosis have from the doctor, you have the pathological findings, and you find you have the living patients to show that they are still alive after the medical profession has given them up. And yet they refused to admit that it is a cure. Speaker 0: After she recovered from the breakdown Renee started again from scratch, brewing the herbal mixture and curing patients in her own basement. Speaker 14: I have to grind them. I used to get them already ground. Speaker 0: Soon the authorities began harassing her again, having her arrested more than once for the most preposterous reasons. But the fame of Asiack had already crossed the border as one day Renee received an invitation to scientifically test her herbal remedy from a clinic in Massachusetts. Speaker 26: About twenty years ago, 1958, here in this laboratory Speaker 0: Its director was Doctor. Charles Brush, who was also President Kennedy's personal physician and a close friend. Speaker 20: Undertook to study the effects of a drug or an herb called Asiac, and we found that it Speaker 26: was non toxic and did have effects and help in the treatment of cancer Speaker 20: and as a result of this Speaker 0: At that point Doctor. Brush recommended Asiac to be tested for toxicity in order to be approved by the FDA as a possible cancer cure. But once the Erbst arrived at Sloan Kettering, one of the most important cancer research centers in the country, the process somehow got bogged down by inexplicable delays and eventually never came to a conclusion. Speaker 27: The results that I reported to Green Case were studies in sarcoma one 180 in the mice in which we were looking not only for possible primary inhibition of the tumor which did not occur, but also for regressions. And there was a very small percentage in a small group of regressions, but we never had the opportunity to confirm this and to see whether we could obtain better results. Speaker 0: Nevertheless, ACAC was not approved by the FDA, exactly as predicted by Doctor. Leonardo thirty years before. Further attempts to legalize the cure were made by different groups of patients who went as far as suing the medical authorities for denying them a possible cure for cancer. Speaker 14: Permit them to have Esiac. They're asking to be given the right to use Esiac since orthodox medicine no longer has any answers for them. Speaker 28: You can't burn a cancer out of a body with radiation. You can't poison it out of the body without poisoning the body as well. And I feel that nature holds the answer, the only answer for cancer patients. And as such, we should have it. Our constitutional rights at the moment are being denied to us. And it shouldn't even come down to a court hearing. It should be a matter of fact that we have what we want for our body. Speaker 29: I have cancer from head to toe in the bone. You're going to try and tell me that if I think there's something that's going to give me a little bit of life that I'm not going to try it. Speaker 0: But the response from the medical authorities has always been the Speaker 30: same, Speaker 0: even at the cost of looking foolish for the ridiculous excuses they often had to concoct to resist its approval. Speaker 7: If we release Laotrel and Esiac and probiozin and so on, I can give you a very long list. You'll have a very wide choice. Then when there is something effective, how will you know which to choose from? Speaker 0: In fact, someone thought better to prevent ACAC from being used in the future by doctors who may eventually respond to a higher calling of their conscience. Speaker 13: As it's well known in the state of California, the state legislature actually made it a felony for a doctor to use any accepted methods of treatment for cancer and they named them in the legislation. Surgery, chemotherapy, radiation and cobalt and when doctors are hand in like this and their very livelihood is threatened they are not going to be anxious to step out of line Speaker 0: Exhausted and frustrated by the endless fight Renee simply returned home and went on treating patients on a personal basis until the day she died in 1978. One year before that, many of her cured patients convened on her ninetieth birthday to thank her for what she had done for them. Speaker 23: Ex patients and supporters arrived in Bracebridge, Ontario. They came to help Rean celebrate her ninetieth birthday. They have experienced the benefits of SEAC. Many of Speaker 8: the people here feel they Speaker 23: owe their life to Rean. Speaker 7: Remember, I brought the Speaker 14: two ladies up to you that day in the house. Speaker 13: I Speaker 14: have given my life for it. I couldn't give any more than I asked. God's been good to let me live this long, to see it used and used by people. Speaker 0: Very similar to Renee's story is the one of Harry Hoxie, a Texas businessman whose father had passed on to him an herbal formula that would reveal highly effective against cancer. Unlike Renee, however, Hoxie was very wealthy and was a natural born fighter who feared no one. This set the premise for one of the most prolonged and virulent fights between an American citizen and the medical authorities in the history of The United States. Speaker 8: The trouble began with what seemed like good news. Speaker 5: And we now have in our files and our records many, many thousands of case histories and records, pathological proof, x-ray photographic studies, that we do positively cure cancer both internal and external. I give you names, times, dates, names of doctors, names of institutions. Speaker 8: The doctors labeled Hoxie the worst cancer quack of the century. But Hoxie's supporters called him an effective healer persecuted by a medical trust. Speaker 5: Cure for cancer, but up to now, they have never proven that this treatment don't cure cancer. Speaker 8: The coal miner with an eighth grade education became a legend in his own time. According to the Hoxie legend, the remedies were discovered by his great grandfather experimenting on a sick horse. As the story goes, John Hoxie was a veterinarian whose prized stallion got cancer. He put it out to pasture to die. But three weeks later, the tumor had stabilized. He observed the horse eating unusual plants, not part of its normal diet. Within a year, the horse was well. So John Hoxie began to experiment on animals with the herbs and he added other popular home remedies. He claimed success and passed the formulas down through the family who eventually used them on people. Hoxie said his father was first to try the medicines on people. He gave young Harry the formulas with a deathbed wish to make the treatment available to people whether or not they could pay. Prophetically, he warned the boy against the high priests of medicine who would fight him jealously. It didn't take long. Hoxie started his first clinic in Illinois in 1924 and he immediately incurred the wrath of organized medicine. He was arrested more times than any other man in medical history. Yet by the nineteen fifties the Hoxie Clinic of Dallas, Texas was the largest privately owned cancer center in the world. Hoxie clinics reached through 17 states. Endorsing the treatment were senators, judges, and even some doctors. Two federal courts upheld its therapeutic value. If the treatment was worthless, how did it gain so much support? To claim a cure for cancer is to invite evaluation. While the medical profession turned its back on Hoxie, numerous individuals did make personal investigations. These experiences repeatedly turned skeptics into believers. Among them was Esquire magazine writer James Wakefield Burke, who in 1939 began covering the Hoxie story. Speaker 5: My boss Arnold Gengrich one day said, why don't you go down to Texas and let's expose this fella. He's getting too big, and the American Medical Association like to put him out of business and said, you go down and get acquainted with him and says, we'll do a couple of pieces on him and put an end to this. So it was an assignment. I came to Texas. I expected to stay about a day, get my information to leave. I became fascinated. I stayed for six weeks. Every day Harry would pick me up, bring me to the clinic. We'd come in in the morning and he would put his arm around these old men and women, say, dad, them doctors been cutting you up. Says, I ain't gonna let them sons of bitches kill you. You're gonna live. And he'd treat them, and I'd watch them treat them. They'd get better and begin to get well. So I wrote an outline for a piece I call which I called the quack who cured cancer. And I sent it to back to the editors, but it it never came out. Speaker 8: Assistant district attorney Al Templeton was more than a skeptic. He arrested Hoxie more than 100 times in two years. Then his own brother, Mike, got terminal cancer and secretly went to Hoxie. When Mike Templeton got well, Al Templeton gave Hoxie the credit. Hoxie's prosecutor became his lawyer. More and more people kept supporting Hoxie's claims of a cure. His boldest promoter was Christian evangelist Gerald Winrod. His radio broadcast reached millions of listeners with sensational reports of Hoxie's mounting successes. Speaker 5: I wish to begin this broadcast by reading for you what I regard as a very important statement, and I quote, judge W. L. Thornton, this is the second jury of 12 men that has found in my court that the Hoxie treatment cures cancer. 10 doctors found that the number of cures reaches into the thousands. Former United States senator Thomas studied a large number of cures. I had made my own investigation, had satisfied myself that cancer was really being cured by the Hoxie Method. This humble reporter can only say, God bless these quacks, the only quacks who are curing cancer today. Speaker 8: But a new cancer treatment needs more than personal investigations to gain acceptance. It needs a formal scientific review. Speaker 5: And when I say to you, all I want is to have them come here. The American Medical Association, the Pure Food and Drugs, the federal government, anybody, come here and make an investigation and if I don't prove to them beyond any question of it out that our treatment is superior to a radium x-ray and surgery, then I will lock the doors of this institution forever. Speaker 0: But the medical profession did not respond to his call. Speaker 5: The doctors claimed that they already knew from their medical education that his remedies were had no efficaciousness at all, with no cure. They were just sought in their ways and adamant in their beliefs. Speaker 8: According to Hoxie, there was a more sinister reason the medical profession wouldn't investigate. Hoxie said the AMA doctors invited him to demonstrate the treatment. Among them was Doctor. Morris Fishbein, editor of the influential AMA journal. According to Hoxie, the day after his successful demonstration, a high AMA official asked to buy the rights to the formulas. The alleged offer would have given all rights to a group of doctors including Doctor. Fishbein. Speaker 0: Just like Renee, Hoxley turned down the offer because he could not get the guarantee that the formula would have been made available for free to anyone who ever needed it. Speaker 8: But one thing was certain, Hoxie had made a very powerful enemy. By crossing swords with doctor Fishbein, he alienated the most influential figure in medicine. Doctor. Fishbein held a unique position. As journal editor, he controlled the main income producing organ of the AMA and thus the organization. He also published the accepted standards of medical practice. After the Chicago incident, doctor Fishbein blackballed Hoxie by branding him a quack in the journal. It commented that Hoxie's most enthusiastic supporter was the local undertaker. The AMA attack was relentless. Doctor Fishbein and Hoxie would battle each other for twenty five years to come in a drama of national dimensions, but rather than settling the dispute through scientific means, they played it out in the media. Speaker 5: At the association's headquarters in Chicago, vigilant against quackery is Doctor. Morris Fishbein. There is no serum, drug, or combination of drugs that we know that will definitely cure cancer. Speaker 8: When Hoxie approached the National Cancer Institute for an investigation, the agency refused. The NCI said his medical records were incomplete. Hoxie said doctors refused to supply necessary records because of doctor Fishbein's influence. The government concluded it would be a waste of public funds to investigate. Having struck oil in Texas, Hoxie offered to pay for a test himself. His challenges were putting doctor Fishbein under public pressure and the doctor fought back hard in the public arena. But when he wrote blood money for the Hearst Sunday papers, he went too far. Hoxie sued doctor Fishbein and the Hearst newspaper empire for libel and slander. He didn't seem to stand a chance. The nation's most notorious quack faced a who's who of American medicine. Surprisingly, Harry Hoxie became the first man ever to win a judgment against doctor Fishbein and the AMA. Doctor Fishbein had to resign from his post at the AMA, but the Hoxie Fishbein trials held an even more shocking revelation. Doctor. Fishbein admitted in court that Hoxie's supposedly brutal pastes actually did cure external cancers. The most dangerous external cancer is melanoma. It can spread rapidly through the body. Doctors advise extremely radical surgery. Even so, is often fatal. Speaker 5: We have more positive proven cases of melanoma in our records and the files in the patients to talk to that have been cured in this institution than any institution in the world, and that's a broad statement. But we have the facts to back it up. Speaker 0: Hoxley went as far as producing his own movie to make his voice heard from the medical profession. Speaker 5: It would be an innovation to men of the medical profession if instead of devoting so much time and money to court trials, sniping tactics, smear campaigns, they would come to the clinic, do some investigating, check into our methods, speak to some of our patients. Then they would understand why our treatment has been as effective and in most cases far more successful than anything they've had to offer as a solution to the cancer problems. Speaker 0: But instead of accepting the invitation, the medical establishment escalated the war. Mildred Nelson has directed Hoxie's clinics from the beginning. Speaker 31: But he was never investigated except in a criminal type of way to see what he might be doing wrong. The food and drug have always been famous for harassing the Hoxie patients. Go to people's houses, take their medicine when it was delivered to them, talk to them, tell them Speaker 5: they were doing wrong. Speaker 8: But when the government couldn't stop Hoxie in court, the FDA decided to take unprecedented action. Speaker 32: Sufferers from cancer, their families, physicians, and all concerned with the care of cancer patients are hereby advised and warned that the so called treatment for internal cancer has been found on the basis of evidence presented by the FDA to be a worthless treatment. And it was so successful that the FDA then went ahead and issued it in a poster form which was put up in post offices around the country. Speaker 5: I'm swimming in blood now. They've done everything they possibly can to try to humiliate me. They've had me in court many, many times. But do I care about that? I'm not thinking about what they're doing to me. I'm thinking about the 12,000 patients who's under treatment observation here at this clinic. I'm only thinking of one thing, suffering humanity. Speaker 8: But the government did more than just warn the public. Although federal prosecutors couldn't prove the treatment was worthless, they did outlaw it on technicalities, like false labeling in interstate commerce. Speaker 31: At one time, we had 17 clinics open across the country. Food and Drug walked in the same date every one of them had padlocked them. And no way did Harry have the money to fight that in court, state by state. Speaker 0: After closing all his clinics Harry Hoxie eventually gave up his twenty five year long fight against the medical establishment. He built a new clinic in Mexico, put Mildred Nelson in charge, and went back to Texas where he died in 1974. The Mexican clinic has been treating thousands of patients over the years and is still active today under different doctors after Mildred Nelson passed away But the Hox C treatment has never been made available to American patients and it cannot even be shipped legally into the country. Those who wish to use the Hox C treatment must travel each time to Mexico and are allowed to bring back only the amount needed for their personal use. All the diets, the health food principles and the nutritional concepts that we share today have a single father: Maximilian Gersen. Doctor. Gersen was the first to ever suggest that good health depends primarily on a healthy nutrition. Born in Germany in 1881 Max Gerson was inspired by the figure of Ignaz Samovice, the Hungarian doctor who discovered that in order to avoid infections in pregnant women physicians simply needed to wash their hands in a chlorine solution. Speaker 33: Prior to receiving his doctorate as a medical student Max Gerson suffered from severe and repeated migraine headaches leaving him essentially unable to function for days. After two years of experimenting, doctor Gersten was able to eliminate his migraines completely by eating only certain raw fruits and vegetables. By 1918, word was spreading about the Gersten migraine diet. But on one occasion, a patient returned with an observation. Not only had the migraine been relieved, but a skin tuberculosis also disappeared. The astounding news spread like wildfire. In April 1924, famous lung specialist, Doctor. Ferdinand Zaurebuch, offered to do a clinical trial with four fifty incurable skin tuberculosis patients. At the commencement of the study, Zaarbrooke said to Gerson privately that if even one patient showed improvement, he would believe every word of Gerson's treatment. Four forty six out of four fifty patients recovered, over ninety nine percent. Doctor. Gerson and his wife Gretchen had three daughters, Joanna, Gertrude, and the youngest Charlotte. Of all the children, Charlotte took a special interest in her father's work. By the late nineteen twenty's, Doctor. Gerson's fame had spread throughout Europe, especially after he cured Doctor. Albert Schweitzer's wife, Helena, of pulmonary tuberculosis and Schweitzer's daughter's skin disease. When Doctor. Schweitzer was 75 years old, he came to Doctor. Gerson with diabetes and was also cured. Speaker 0: The Gerson therapy aims to achieve a complete detoxification of the body through a series of intestinal washes based on organic coffee and a strict diet of raw vegetables and fruits grown in an optimal terrain. Meat is absolutely to be avoided as explained by Charlotte, Doctor. Gerson's 82 year old daughter. Speaker 34: Because meat in the body, in the digestive process causes acidity, phosphoric acid And in this kind of acidity the body isn't able to function. The body has to maintain homeostasis, to maintain a very exact level of alkalinity versus acidity. Speaker 0: Once detoxified, the human body confirms being a wonderful machine capable of healing itself from any given disease. Speaker 33: Between 1933 and World War two, Gerson and his family fled Nazi persecution, eventually settling in New York. Doctor Gerson's seven siblings died in the Holocaust. Throughout the forties, doctor Gerson's success at his New York clinic stunned the medical community, but also evoked the dark forces within it. Doctor Gerson was curing patients with cancer, and as a consequence, he testified before the United States Senate on July the first, second, and third in nineteen forty six along with five of his recovered cancer patients and the medical records of five more. So stunning was this testimony that on the evening of 07/03/1946, renowned ABC news correspondent Raymond Graham Swing declared on his radio broadcast to the entire United States that for the first time in history, they had been discovered a cure for cancer. The public response was overwhelming, staggering, lighting up the switchboards at ABC nonstop, out of control, unbelievable, but what happened next was even more so. Two weeks later, Raymond Graham Swing was fired from his position at ABC that it held for over thirty years and the Pepper Neely Anticancer Bill of 1946, document number eight nine four seven now gathers dust in the archives of the United States printing office. Speaker 0: Behind it all, it wasn't hard to see the hand of Morris Fishbein and the AMA. Fishbein had already been in a long struggle with Gerson since the German doctor was the first to ever denounce the dangers of smoking at a time when the largest advertising contributor for the AMA was in fact Philip Morris. Speaker 5: In a repeated national survey, doctors in all branches of medicine, doctors in all parts of the country were asked, what cigarette do you smoke, doctor? Once again, the brand named most was Camel. Yes. According to this repeated nationwide survey, more doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette. Speaker 0: Max Gerson was ostracized from the entire medical community who labeled him a quack, continuously attacked him and harassed him. Speaker 35: I was investigated. Five times. What do you mean by being investigated, sir? Won't they hear me? They investigated you. Yes. Five times. Every time they come, I show them here the patient you sent home to die cured. Other patients, you sent home to die cured. Next patient, you sent home to die cured. What are you going to do? You don't look like the type of man that's going to give up at this point. No. How could I give up when I see these wonderful results? That's impossible. First, I write the cancer book. And in that cancer book, I will bring in as many cases as possible sent home to die. So that every physician hears the cancer can read it, and I will have it translated, translated in many languages. Speaker 0: It took Gerson ten years to write the book, which presented 50 fully documented terminal cases he had cured with his therapy. Yet Gerson found no major publisher willing to release the book in The United States. Speaker 8: At that point, he was totally and forever banned from, from publication in The United States. Speaker 36: Why was the American Medical Association so opposed to the Garrison therapy? I think all the medical associations were opposed to the Garrison therapy. Here comes a new approach, a nutritional approach, an effective approach. The medical pharmaceutical industry, if it even wants a cure for cancer since there's so much profit in this disease, certainly does not want the cure to be a nutritional one. Speaker 0: Doctor. Gerson spent the rest of his life secluded in his New York apartment, where he kept curing patients with the same therapy that in the meantime was being forbidden all over The United States. Speaker 37: This is where Doctor. Gerson was up until the day of his death, where he had a clinic, he saw patients, where patients recovered from cancer, where he documented so many recoveries, yet those recoveries are not available to the public. Those published articles have been published in Europe, but have not been allowed to be published in American journals. Why? The reason for that is the fact that it's not a patented medicine, and it's not an expensive medicine. I mean, this is the crux of the matter. This is a natural therapy that allows people to take control of their own health and not require drug intervention. Speaker 36: If the Gerson therapy were permitted inside The United States, and I believe that it should be, we would see a dramatic decrease in deaths from cancer. I would estimate the fatality rate would go down by at least fifty percent, very possibly more so. Speaker 0: Exactly like Mildred Nelson, Charlotte Gerson had to go all the way to Mexico to open a clinic to cure people after her father's death. Over the years, Gerson Clinic has seen a continuous flow of patients from all over the world. The medical records from over 1,500 patients are available to anybody who wishes to examine them. Speaker 34: Father, any physician is heartily invited to come to the Mexican hospital and visit and see a patient there or visit with the patients and with their permission then they would have access to their medical records. Speaker 0: But the medical establishment kept ignoring the call while officially continuing to deny the validity of the Gerson therapy. Speaker 1: Doctor Dean Adell, whose popular radio and television programs Speaker 0: A fixture in American television, Doctor Adell has been representing the voice of official medicine on national television for many years. Speaker 38: I don't think that Gerson's therapy has ever cured a terminally ill patient. People get very confused by this. If you think of basically what's in Gerson therapy, you really wouldn't expect it to cure cancer. But people, sometimes cancer cures itself. There is a rate of cancer, it goes away by itself. Some people didn't really have cancer, was a misdiagnosis. Speaker 39: In 1986 I was diagnosed with pancreas cancer which has spread to my liver, gallbladder, and spleen. Doctors told me I had three months to live, to go home, get my finances in order, and prepare to die. My husband just wouldn't accept it. I was only 46 at the time, far too young. So we came home, did therapy for two years. After three months, my doctors here wondered why I was still living. They asked me if I would have a CAT scan, which I did. The masses of the cancer had gone. They said, I don't know what you're doing. We don't want to know what you're doing. Just keep doing it. The doctors at that time said I would never live to see my second grandchild, which she is now 19 years old. So we proved them wrong. Speaker 30: After the therapy, we went back to Utah to a specialist on blood and she said my blood was so clean and clear that she couldn't tell I never had cancer and she said I was the first patient that ever happened to Speaker 40: Yes, and after I had gone back to the oncologist after I had done the Gerson therapy for a couple months, At that time when they had found that I was cured of cancer from the CT scan that they had done on my abdomen, he couldn't believe it. He thought it was a miracle. Speaker 41: For the ten years following being on the Gerson therapy, which took a year and a half, I started going back to the Mayo Clinic and seeing Doctor. Scutt, who was an oncologist there, just for checkups to be sure I was clear. And he said everything was like an 18 year old again. My blood profile was perfect and he couldn't believe how I looked and how much energy I had and he asked me what I'd done and I went over the Gerson therapy with him. Doctor. Scott said, That's great, but he said that we can't sell that. Speaker 0: Doctor. Wallace Sampson is the editor of the Scientific Review on Alternative Medicine and Aberrant Medical Practices, which claims to present an objective viewpoint. Speaker 20: Has Gerson therapy ever cured a cancer patient? Speaker 30: Of course not. They won't even release their record, So Speaker 20: What would it take for you to be convinced that this therapy has credibility? Speaker 30: Well, first of all, they have to show some reason why it should work. We know why how cancers behave, and we know the kinds of things that cause cancer. They have to come up with some kind of a believable theory of why their diet should work. But second of all, they'd have to convince us that everything we know about it in the past fifty years is wrong and they're right. Now how how are they gonna come up with material like that? That's impossible. They don't have it. Speaker 37: Doctor. Gerson documented so many recoveries, yet those recoveries are not available to the public. Those published articles have been published in Europe but have not been allowed to be published in American journals. Speaker 0: Doctor. Stephen Barrett can be considered today's equivalent of Morris Fishbein. Steady at the helm of his publication Quack Watch Doctor. Barrett denounces every form of therapy that the official medicine considers to be a fraud or a fake. Speaker 42: Take the Gerson therapy for example. Gerson was a physician who claimed that he could cure cancer with diet and a number of other methods. There's absolutely no scientific evidence that he's cured anyone. Speaker 35: I was investigated by science on the EMA. Every time they come, I show them here the patient you sent home to die cured. Other patients, you sent home to die cured. Next patient, you sent home to die cured. Speaker 34: The Gerson therapy was known some seventy five years ago. If doctors know there is a cure and send patients home to die, that is an atrocity worse than the Holocaust. Speaker 0: Doctor. Gerd Hammer is the founder of the so called New German Medicine. Doctor. Hammer believes that each cancer is consequence of a deep psychological trauma that was not completely resolved by the individual, manifesting in a specific kind of tumor for each kind of trauma. Despite the large popular movement in his favor, despite the support of many other doctors from all over the world and despite the scientific evidence presented by Doctor. Hammer, the medical institutions have never undertaken a serious evaluation of his work and have proceeded to revoke his license instead. Since then European authorities have been continuously harassing Doctor. Hammer until one day he was arrested in Spain simply for having advised other citizens on the curative method they should follow. Doctor Hammer ended up spending nineteen months in a French prison Today Doctor Hammer is a free citizen again but he cannot practice medicine nor can he promote in any way his theory which appears to have the potential of helping thousands of people all over the world. In the 1970s Doctor Ernst T Krebs perfected the so called trophoblastic theory of cancer that had been originally proposed by Doctor. John Beard one century ago. The same theory had been developed and publicized by the father Doctor. Ernst Krebs. According to Krebs vitamin B17 which is found in seeds of apricots and other similar fruits is an effective cure against many kinds of cancers and especially breast, lung, colon and prostate cancers. Vitamin B17 also known as Laotrel has been one of the most popular remedies against cancer since the 1950s and in the last decade has collected the support of many scientists and oncologists from all over the world. In Italy Doctor. Quaddetti from the Turin University undertook a scientific study on leotrel that showed very promising results. Speaker 15: Doctor. Dean Burke, head of the Cytochemistry Section of the National Cancer Institute, has reported that in a series of tests on animal tissue, the B-seventeen had no effect on normal cells, but released so much cyanide and benzaldehyde when it came in contact with cancer cells that not one of them could survive. He said, When we add Laotryl to a cancer culture under the microscope, we can see the cancer cells dying off like flies. Speaker 0: Also Sloan Kettering, the New York based Cancer Research Institute, seems to have known about the therapeutic qualities of Leotrel for a long time. This was confirmed by one of the foremost cancer researchers of the time, Doctor. Kanamatsu Sugiura, in a magazine interview published in 1977. As the news began to spread, Sloan Kettering pressured Sugiura to refute his statements, but he refused to do so, forcing Sloan Kettering to officially deny the anticancer qualities of Sloan Kettering was later accused of falsifying the research on which they based their negative statement on Laotrel. This was not the only case in the major war waged by the medical industry in the 1970s against Laotrel. Speaker 15: Doctor. John Richardson, MD, who's now deceased, had a cancer clinic, a very thriving cancer clinic up in the San Francisco area in the 70s when he met Doctor. Ernst de Krebs Jr. Had many conferences with him, became familiar with the theory, the science behind it and began to cautiously use it in his practice. He was losing most of his patients that he was treating with cancer. He went from that to a high success rate almost overnight by using this substance. And so he became very enthusiastic about it. The word got around. His patients were very happy of course and they told their friends. It wasn't very long before people were coming from all over The United States and in some cases even from Europe to be treated at the Richardson Clinic. Then he got into trouble with the medical authorities. The hospital administration contacted him and said, you have to stop using this material because it is not approved by the FDA. And he said, yeah, I know it's not approved, but it works. They said, we don't care whether it works or not. It is not an approved substance and you're in violation of the law. Speaker 0: Medical authorities have never recognized the therapeutic use of Laotrel while the FDA has listed it among the toxic substances making it in fact illegal to be sold in The United States. In 1992, Doctor. William Lane published a book called Sharks Don't Get Cancer in which he maintained that shark cartilage has the capacity of inhibiting the growth of tumors. In order to grow beyond a certain size every tumor needs to build its own capillary system. The creation of new blood vessels is called angiogenesis. Shark cartilage has a specific anti angiogenic characteristic in that it envelops the growing tumor and literally suffocates it by not allowing the new capillary system to grow The anti angiogenic characteristic of shark cartilage is well known to official medicine and is confirmed by a number of different scientific studies but shark cartilage for some reason is not suggested as a cure cancer while the pharmaceutical companies are competing in secret to produce a similar compound in the lab or to extract from the cartilage a specific compound that can be patented and exploited commercially. Speaker 15: What they are interested in finding something perhaps within something in nature, if they can find some subcomponent that they can extract and then make it a man made chemical that works the same way, then they can patent that, then they're interested, but not if it comes from nature. Speaker 0: Another well known remedy against cancer, particularly popular in Europe, is mistletoe, a semi parasitic plant found on oaks and other similar trees. Mistletoe is used to produce different medicines like Iscador whose effectiveness against cancer has been known for many years. Speaker 43: I think it deserves some merit because it's nothing new, it's not a fad, it's been around a long time, it's been used for over seventy, eighty years. Speaker 0: Austrian scientist and philosopher Rudolf Steiner, the founder of anthropological medicine, suggested the use of mistletoe against cancer almost a hundred years ago. This plant has been considered sacred since the times of the Celts who worshipped it and used it as a universal ailment. In a cancer patient mistletoe causes an immediate increase in the macrophages which is normally followed by a regression of the disease. Speaker 43: We do know that it has immune stimulatory properties like if you measure like cytokines they Speaker 5: can Speaker 43: see them actually go up with using mistletoe. There's components in mistletoe that are actually cytotoxic, meaning it actually can kill cancer cells or it can put them to sleep. Speaker 0: In Steiner clinics, Ischidor is used as part of a larger program against cancer that includes all the emotional, psychological and spiritual aspects of the individual. In The United States, mistletoe is almost unknown. The task of denying its curative qualities has been taken up, in this case by the British sanitary system, which resorted to the well known excuse of absence of evidence. Speaker 44: The PCT has reviewed the evidence relating to mistletoe in the management of breast cancer. And we have found and and I'm one of the people that's looked at the evidence. We found that there's no convincing supporting evidence. Speaker 0: Recently, American author and actress Suzanne Somers announced that she defeated cancer using mistletoe. Speaker 45: You mentioned cancer back in 2001. On this program, announced that you had been battling cancer. Most people would just go to a doctor and get chemo. You went a different route. How are you now? Speaker 13: Well, I just had my killer cells tested naturally. That's your immune system. You know, I've been injecting that Iscador now for eight years. So, haven't had a cold, I haven't had anything. Speaker 45: You don't have cancer? Speaker 13: I don't have cancer anymore. Speaker 0: The list of historic cases in which a potential cure for cancer has fallen into oblivion could literally continue for hours. From the vitamin C cure by Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling to the infamous Krebiosin by Doctor. Ivy from the molecular cures through the microscope of Doctor. Reif to Doctor. Collins toxins, the dynamics have always been the same. The doctors have been ostracized, derided or persecuted without their therapies ever being considered for serious scientific evaluation. The last person to propose a natural cure against cancer is an Italian oncologist who finds himself in the middle of a storm after having declared that the origin of cancer is not genetic but it is due to the aggression of a fungus called Candida albicans Based on this hypothesis Doctor. Simoncini treats cancer with sodium bicarbonate which is one of the strongest enemies of fungi in nature. How does a fungus get in the body? Where do you think this all starts from years of research? Speaker 46: There is an enemy. A big epidemic pollution because the fungus is undervalued. It is undervalued because it is not understood. Speaker 0: From the very beginning of his studies Doctor. Simoncini felt the need to reconsider the cancer paradigm from scratch and began looking for a different origin of the disease. What puzzled him the most was the fact that all tumors behave in the same way even though they appear completely from one another. Then he started looking for a common denominator and eventually found one. Most cancers appear white. These tumor specimens show the devastating impact the disease can have on the body. This is a liver riddled with cancer. The white bubbles are all tumors. Speaker 46: If you enter the body and you reach an organ affected by the cancer, you can see that the lamps are always white. Sometimes it is covered with blood or with the deffens reaction. But in every post mortem examination, scientists find the white lamps, the white masses, that is fungi. This is the pleura. We entered with a camera and look, the pleura should be red. But you can see all the lamps, all the cancer that is white. This is a heartbeat. This is a bronchial cancer. Look, we went into the bronchial. Look, they are white. And then in the colon cancer. This is red because there is a little bit blood. I washed it up. Now, look, look, it is always white. Speaker 0: White like candida. Candida albicans in Latin means glowing white. It should be clarified that the presence of fungi in tumors is nothing new in the medical world. Speaker 46: All the scientists find in the oncologic world the cancer patients, when they die, they are all invaded by the fungi, but nobody wonders that this is the only microorganism present in cancer patients. Speaker 0: Official oncology however believes that their presence in tumors is due to their opportunistic nature which brings them to build colonies wherever they find a suitable environment. This belief though seems contradicted by a careful observation of the animal world. Speaker 47: Spores from a parasitic fungus called caudiceps have infiltrated this ant's body and mind. As soon as she's discovered by the workers, the ant is taken away and dumped far away from the colony. It seems extreme, but this is the reason why. After a while, the fruiting body of the caudiceps erupts from the ant's head. It can take three weeks to grow, and when finished, the deadly spores will burst from its tip. Then, any ant in the vicinity will be in serious risk of death. The fungus is so virulent, it can wipe out whole colonies of ants. And it's not just ants that fall victims to this killer. Speaker 0: In this case, it was the fungus that caused the ants death, not the death of the ant to invite the presence of the fungus. What normally appears to be a simple opportunist is in fact a full fledged assassin. Speaker 46: Not all infections are bacteria. There are also the fungi. Viruses, smaller. Fungi, bigger. And fungi are the connecting point from the microorganism and the animals. So they can enter in a body like microorganism, and they can aggregate once they are inside, and they can build a big mass that has the power of an animal. Speaker 0: Candida is a very familiar fungus known especially to women who sometimes experience an infection in their sexual organs. Speaker 31: The Speaker 48: vagina is muscular canal that leads from the outside of the body to the uterus. The warmth and moisture of this canal create a perfect environment for microorganisms to breathe. For example, bacteria called lactobacilli which are naturally present in the vagina coexist with a yeast fungus called Candida albicans. Normally the Lactobacilli create an acidic environment that keeps the natural yeast population in balance. However, when conditions within the vagina change that either decrease the numbers of lactobacilli or decrease the acidity these yeast fungi begin to multiply. Speaker 0: Normally the immune system keeps the fungi under control and doesn't allow them to establish colonies in your body. This white cell spots a fungus in the bloodstream, attacks it and destroys it. If the system's defenses instead get lower than usual, the candida can manage to aggregate into small colonies practically everywhere in the body. Far from being a wild uncontrolled cellular replication according to Simoncini the growth of a tumor is a lucid and desperate reaction from the organism in an extreme attempt to reject the intruder. By the same token Doctor. Simoncini believes that metastasis are not cancerous cells that leave the primary tumor to go start a new one somewhere else but small groups of fungi belonging to the primary tumor that fall into the bloodstream during biopsies or during a regular surgical operation. These runaway fungi settle in a new environment and prepare to take advantage of a weakened organism to establish their new colony. Once this propagation has started it becomes necessary to restore the immune system to its maximum potency as soon as possible. If the patient is given chemotherapy instead this only accelerates the destruction of his natural defenses as the drug kills indiscriminately cancerous and healthy cells. While possibly prolonging the survival by a few months chemotherapy makes it impossible for the organism to recover its defense capability making it bound to succumb sooner or later to the multiplying fungal attacks. In order to test his theory Doctor. Simoncini began treating cancer with sodium bicarbonate. Speaker 46: Sodium bicarbonate is the strongest substance against fungi. They cannot adapt to a salt because it is not a complex substance. That's why drug, today's today's antifungal antifungal drugs are ineffective because the fungi can adapt themselves in three, four days. For a fungus, you give an antifungal drug. You can kill the first layer, but the second layer, they get used and they eat drugs, chemotherapy, everything. Speaker 8: Gennaro Sangermano is the first patient ever cured by Doctor. Simon Chimi with sodium bicarbonate. In 1983, he was diagnosed with lung cancer and was given a life expectancy of six, seven months at best. In 2006, twenty three years later, he gave this interview. Speaker 0: After a few successful treatments, Doctor. Simoncini presented his documentation to the Italian Department of Health, hoping that his theory was put to test under proper scientific protocols. Not only were his findings completely ignored, but Doctor. Simoncini ended up being disbarred from the Italian medical order for having prescribed cures that had not been approved by the authorities. This is rather unfortunate as even the ancient Hindu books of medicine prescribed the use of sodium bicarbonate against cancer. Alkali of strong potency should be used in diseases arising from annula, schlezma, maida, cancerous growths and such others which are very difficult to cure. This book is over 1,000 years old. As soon as the news of his treatment started to circulate doctor Simoncini became the target of a major smear campaign orchestrated through the Italian media in which he was treated as a charlatan and a swindler. Doctor. Simoncini was also repeatedly sued for wrongful death and in one case sentenced to three years in prison for having allegedly caused the death of patients who had undergone his treatment. The media seized greedily on the trials delivering the final blow to Doctor. Simoncini's credibility. The paradox is that Tulio Simencini is not an alternative doctor nor is he against the system at all, but he is possibly the most allopathic and orthodox of them all. In the meantime he has perfected special techniques that allow him to deliver the sodium bicarbonate next to the tumor in order to obtain the maximum effectiveness with a minimum amount of sodium bicarbonate. Speaker 46: Sodium bicarbonate is effective if you can put in contact sodium bicarbonate with the cancer. So, if you want to reach the prostate cancer, you have to locate before a catheter in the podenta artery that reaches the prostate. Then you can administer through a portcath connected to the catheter the sodium bicarbonate directly to the prostate and kill fungi because the concentration of salt is very high because you use the artery that is directly feeding the organ. Instead, for the cavities, pleura, peritoneal, we have to locate a transperitoneal or a pleural catheter. Speaker 0: Although considered only anecdotal material and not scientific evidence, there are now dozens of fully documented testimonies which appear on Doctor. Simoncini's website that seem to support the validity of his innovative approach to cancer. This therapy you're talking about, sodium bicarbonate delivered directly into the tumor site, I wonder where the harm is. Seems like a very harmless therapy. It isn't a potent, dangerous medicine. Speaker 46: No, it's not dangerous because there is a remote possibility of infection. But there is the life on the other hand. And then there some type of cancer, breast cancer, doesn't need avacademia, bladder cancer, brain cancer. Breast and bladder cancer with sodium bicarbonate can heal in ninety nine percent without surgery, without chemotherapy, without radiotherapy, and let the organs there. Speaker 0: Doctor. Simancini believes that also skin cancers are caused by a fungus and treats them with regular iodine tincture. In some cases patients have reported even the nastiest melanomas to fall off within weeks like simple scabs. Speaker 43: And the cancer is gone? Totally gone. Speaker 5: For the first time, know, I feel like I got my life back again. Speaker 0: Not every cancer, however can be treated with the same effectiveness. Bone cancers for example receive hardly any blood at all and are very difficult to reach with the proper amount of sodium bicarbonate. Different techniques in some cases can be applied. The last testimony is from someone who found himself on both sides of the fence at the same time a doctor who got cancer. After the removal of a primary tumor in the bowel, Doctor. Lombardo learned he had some metastasis in his liver. Just before undergoing the liver surgery, he learned that he had also developed a metastasis in each of his lungs. After returning home, Doctor. Lombardo found out about Doctor. Simencini's therapy and chose to use the ports that had been prepared for the chemo to introduce the bicarbonate solution instead. After a few cycles of sodium bicarbonate, a CAT scan revealed both tumors had disappeared from his lungs.
Saved - September 14, 2026 at 7:32 PM

@benwehrman - Ben Wehrman

The Moon is a celestial map reflecting the full Earth realm. It shows us the land masses being hidden from us. https://t.co/oUlCO2dIl1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that famous scientists—Einstein, Hubble, Hawking, Arthur Eddington, and Wolfgang Pauli—“all explain” that you can’t prove from the Earth that Earth is moving, including regarding stellar aberration. They claim that those scientists can create a model that accounts for “alleged parallax,” retrograde motion, stellar aberration, and other observations while keeping Earth stationary in a geocentric model. They also state that it is impossible to prove that Earth is spinning or revolving. The speaker cites Stephen Hawking (2007), saying Hawking explained—by quoting Einstein’s writings in Special and General Theory of Relativity and Einstein’s paper combining the two theories—that you can’t prove that Earth is spinning. The speaker then claims that people choose to believe in the Copernican principle because of a belief system, described as a “religion,” that triggers people—particularly that it involves hatred of God and is “a belief system built upon the doctrine of men.” The speaker says this belief system is presented as having no empirical, verifiable evidence and is “contrary and antithetical to the actual evidence.” They assert that they “read him point blank say it can never be disproven,” and that this disregard is because of “the horror of a special and unique position.” The speaker claims they have “plenty of quotes” from geocentrists and heliocentrists who say you can never prove whether Earth is stationary. They argue that because Earth being special would be implied, the preferred conclusion is to avoid accepting that possibility. Instead, they say people look at the background distribution and “the energy coming away from the Earth” and claim it shows Earth in the center. According to the speaker, rather than accepting Earth’s centrality, critics label the observed pattern the “axis of evil.” The speaker says critics then propose a new idea and avoid specifying what the explanation is because it has “spiritual implications” and “philosophical ramifications,” which the speaker says include the notion that Earth had to be placed there, giving Earth a special, unique position. The speaker also claims that critics want people to believe in an ever-expanding universe originating from “nothingness,” with “tiny specks of dust,” and with a “pre-existing energy,” and they refer to ideas such as “lightning struck primordial soup.” The speaker further claims that these explanations are avoided for reasons related to fear of moral accountability and that people are “brainwashed and indoctrinated” with an idea portrayed as science and proven, though the speaker asserts it is “not questionable.” They say the core issue is that philosophy leads to atheism, nihilism, and materialism, and that this is portrayed as scientific fact. Finally, the speaker returns to a claim about observational indistinguishability: you can’t prove Earth isn’t moving, but if Earth is a spinning ball, it “gives us the illusion that it is stationary.” They say this is what the current astronomical and astrophysical model is based on.
Full Transcript
Einstein, Hubble, Hawking, Arthur Eddington, you name 'em, you name 'em, Wolfgang Pauli, they all explain. You can't prove that the Earth is moving from the Earth. You can't, including stellar aberration. And they will tell you point blank that they can create a model for you that explains alleged parallax, which doesn't actually happen, retrograde motion, stellar aberration, all in a geocentric model with the Earth stationary, and you can't prove that it's spinning or revolving on the, the Earth itself is impossible. Stephen Hawking in two thousand and seven explained it, quoting Einstein from his writings in Special and General Theory of Relativity, his paper on the combined two theories, explaining that you can't prove that the Earth is spinning. They choose to believe in the Copernican principle because they have a religion that triggers people, because they, they think they hate religion, they, they hate God oftentimes, but that is a religion. It's a belief system built upon the doctrine of men, void of empirical verifiable evidence, and in fact, contrary and antithetical to the actual evidence, despite what the evidence says. I just now read him point blank say it can never be disproven. We disregard that possibility because of the horror of a special and unique position. Right? And I have plenty of quotes here from geocentrist or heliocentrist explaining you can never prove it. You can't prove that the Earth is sta- or that the Earth isn't stationary. But we don't want to believe that, because that would mean the Earth is special. So then what do we do? We go look out at the background distribution, the energy coming away from the Earth, it shows the Earth in the center. So what do they do? They call it the axis of evil. Then they come up with a new idea, well, oh, it does look like They don't want to say what it is because it has spiritual implications, it has philosophical ramifications, and that is that the Earth had to be placed there, it has a special, unique position. They want you-- they want to believe that there are tiny specks of dust in an ever-expanding universe of nothingness where everything came from nothing, and there's a pre-existing energy. Let's not talk about that part. Oh, lightning struck primordial soup and all this nonsense. And, and you know, why? That's a good question probably, 'cause they're sca-scared of like moral accountability And we're brainwashed and indoctrinated with this idea as if it is science and it's proven and it's not questionable. And when you actually go look behind the curtain, it's philosophy, and they admit it. So I-- that's why I gave the specific quotes, and it was walked past. It's the crux of the whole issue. There is a philosophy that leads to atheism and nihilism and materialism portrayed onto the world as if it is in fact scientific fact. You can't prove that the Earth isn't moving. If the Earth is a ball that spins, wouldn't It gives us the illusion that it's stationary. This is what all of the astr- astronomers and astrophysicists say that gave you the current model.

@benwehrman - Ben Wehrman

Moon vs. Flat Earth Map Overlay https://t.co/MwbW3iLEZ7

Saved - September 8, 2026 at 2:20 PM

@benwehrman - Ben Wehrman

Lifting the Veil of Deception - FULL DOCUMENTARY The official version of human history is a construct of lies, and we are currently in a state of collective amnesia. It's time we free ourselves from the artificial matrix that has been imposed on us. https://t.co/YWv5t0JtsM

@benwehrman - Ben Wehrman

STOLEN HISTORY: Who are we really... And where do we come from? https://t.co/qLYiaiWzAj

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions what people truly know about their past, asking whether humanity suffers from collective memory loss and suggesting that “nothing is as it seems.” They ask whether a technically advanced, unified civilization existed on Earth less than five hundred years ago and whether “star cities” are markers of that civilization, arguing their scale and complexity make them unreasonable for defense. They propose that this civilization broke into pieces during a massive cataclysm and that a “reset” destroyed large parts of human knowledge and culture. The transcript links that alleged reset to later developments, including industrialization, the establishment of central banks, the debt money system, and a political system described as “fake democracy.” It also claims religion was established as a means of manipulation after a previous society collapsed and unimaginable suffering settled over Earth, framing great religions as cults of salvation and redemption reacting to an end-of-the-world experience. The speaker raises historical inconsistencies, including claims about Scuthia and Tartary being erased from maps and memory; questions about Pompeii’s burial timeline and the content of inscriptions; and the absence of church or Christian symbolism in the excavated city. They ask why cave paintings deteriorate quickly after modern discovery and cite the discovery of Altamira Cave in 1878 by a member of the Spanish Santander family, noting that paintings were initially considered a Darwinist forgery. The speaker also asks why architecture before the twentieth century shows the same principles worldwide and why human knowledge “exploded” in the nineteenth century only to stagnate, asserting that apart from computers and the Internet there have been no fundamental technological breakthroughs for one hundred years. World’s Fairs are framed as a mechanism for introducing forgotten technology, with the speaker noting huge losses despite funding by industrial figures and asking whether remnants of older structures were secretly destroyed under the pretense of temporary exposition. They also question forced removal of millions of orphans by the church to the New World, the rise of insane asylums in the nineteenth century, and the imprisonment of political dissidents alongside those described as mentally ill, including whether repurposed buildings became prisons for those resisting a new order. The transcript asks how long it took to wipe out the last keepers of ancient knowledge and whether Freemasons are named because they “pass off the architecture of the old world as their own work.” The speaker connects broader geopolitical events to alleged attempts to destroy remnants of an ancient world, referencing Spanish, Portuguese, and British colonialism; the U.S. civil war as a conflict described as between Vatican-infiltrated northern states and “freedom loving” Southern opposition; and the establishment of communism and a global twentieth-century conflict as a means to wipe out European old world culture. They ask whether the biblical serpent symbolizes a primordial enemy, whether there was once a unified language, and whether events including the 1811 Great Comet, 1812 New Madrid earthquake, and 1816 “Year Without a Summer” represent a single historical event. They question why Napoleon appears at that time and whether he was “invented” as a historical placemarker for a disaster. They then ask whether modern science was created to keep people in a “mental prison,” and why people are “getting sicker and sicker,” suggesting knowledge was stolen. The transcript frames the biblical flood as an echo of an event that wiped out the ancient world less than five hundred years ago, asks whether there were giants who taught secret knowledge, and proposes that they may have created star cities, canal systems, and grid patterns worldwide. It further suggests Earth may have been a terraforming project and contrasts “free ether energy” with extraction-based energy systems intended to enslave humanity, linking star cities to energy production, protection, and the role of frequencies in creating complex star forms. The speaker concludes by asking who benefits from keeping humanity asleep, why ancient myths contain more truth than textbooks and modern research, and whether collective memories in myths are inaccessible due to amnesia, ending with: “Nothing is as it seems. It’s time for us to remember again.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wake up. What do we really know about our past? We suffering from a collective memory loss? Who are we really and where do we come from? Was there a technically advanced unified civilization on our planet less than five hundred years ago? Are star cities one of the markers of this civilization? Was there a reset that destroyed large parts of our past, our knowledge, and culture, nothing is as it seems. It's time for us to remember again and lift the veil of deception. What do we really know about our past? What if everything was different from what we have always been told? Was there a technically advanced unified civilization on our planet less than five hundred years ago? The scale and complexity of star cities make them unreasonable for defense. Are star cities one of the markers of this civilization? Did this civilization break into pieces in the course of a massive cataclysm? Was there a reset that destroyed large parts of our past, our knowledge and culture? Was industrialization, the establishment of central banks, the debt money system, and the political system of fake democracy a consequence of this reset? Was religion established as a means of manipulation after the previous society collapsed and unimaginable suffering settled over the earth? Are the great religions merely cults of salvation and redemption in reaction to the experienced end of the world? Why has Scuthia, then Tartary, been erased from the maps and from our memory? Was Pompeii not buried until the eruption of Vesuvius in sixteen thirty one AD as the researcher Andreas Churilov claims, why do the inscriptions on the walls and houses in Pompeii speak of a war of Rome against free Italy? If Pompeii sank only four hundred years ago, why is there no church or other Christian symbolism in the excavated city? How is it that cave paintings that have lasted thousands of years deteriorate so soon after modern discovery? Are they simply modern forgeries intended to establish the theory of evolution? Why were the first cave paintings discovered only after the theory of evolution was firmly established? Cave paintings went seemingly unnoticed to mankind until 1878, when a member of the influential Spanish Santander family discovered them in a cave on his property in Altamira. It remains a fact that most scholars at the time thought the paintings in Altamira Cave were a Darwinist forgery. Why does architecture before the twentieth century exhibit the same principles worldwide? The structures of the ancient world were based on principles that we now call Greco Roman. Did the Industrial Revolution merely reintroduce technological knowledge that we had previously possessed? Why did human knowledge explode in the nineteenth century only to stagnate? Apart from computers and the Internet, there has been no fundamental breakthrough in technology for one hundred years. What role did the World's Fairs play in introducing forgotten technology? Why did the World's Fairs all incur huge losses despite their funding by profit minded industrial rubber barons? Demolishing hundreds of impressive neoclassical buildings so soon after their construction adds to the mystery of this losing proposition. Were these power players secretly destroying remnants of old world structures under the pretense of a temporary exposition? Why were millions of orphans taken against their will by the church to the New World? What happened in Europe that millions of families allowed their children to be taken from them? Why was it only in the nineteenth century that insane asylums began to be established, and why were both political dissidents and the supposedly mentally ill imprisoned there? Why do these asylums exhibit the same architectural principles that we know from the old world? Were the impressive buildings of the old unified civilization repurposed as prisons for those who resisted the new order? To date, almost all these asylums have been demolished. Another economic mystery. Were the asylums just the logical continuation of the church's inquisition and witch hunts? How long did it take to wipe out the last keepers of ancient knowledge? Are Freemasons called Freemasons because they pass off the architecture of the old world as their own work? Freemasonry equals Freemasonry? Was colonialism and imperialism of the Spanish, Portuguese, and British nothing more than a merciless worldwide raid to destroy and annex the remnants of the ancient world? Was the civil war in The US really a war between the Vatican infiltrated northern states and the freedom loving Southern region who refused to deny their true past? Was the establishment of communism and a twentieth century global conflict two sides of the same coin to wipe out any last remnant of European old world culture? Does the biblical serpent symbolize the primordial enemy of mankind, a hostile nonhuman race? Was there once a unified language on earth? Are the events of the eighteen eleven Great Comet, eighteen twelve New Madrid earthquake, and eighteen sixteen Year Without a Summer representative of a single event in history? Why does Napoleon appear exactly at this time to allegedly destroy half of Europe? Was Napoleon invented as a historical placemaker for a cataclysmic disaster that occurred in Europe? It's an it's oblate. And officially, it's an oblate spheroid. That's what we call it. Was modern science, specifically physics, astrophysics, archaeology, evolutionary biology, and geology created just to keep us in a mental prison? Why are people getting sicker and sicker? Has most of the real knowledge been stolen from us? Is the myth of the biblical flood the echoes of an event that wiped out the ancient world less than five hundred years ago? Were there giants on earth? Did we worship them as gods? Did they teach us secret knowledge about architecture, medicine, astronomy, and our origins? Are they the creators of the star cities, the complex canal systems and grid patterns found all over the planet? Perhaps Earth was a gigantic terraforming project. Was free ether energy replaced with messy energy extraction from limited resources to enslave humanity? Were star cities used for energy production and energetic protection from our enemies, what role did frequencies play in the creation of highly complex star forms? Are we suffering from a collective memory loss? Is history nothing more than an artificial matrix of repetitive events created for the purpose of suppressing our true potential? Who benefits from keeping humanity asleep? Who are we really and where do we come from? Why does it seem that more truth is found in the ancient stories and myths of our ancestors than our textbooks and modern scientific research? Does our amnesia keep us from accessing these collective memories found in ancient myths? Is that lost part of humanity the reason modern life is so cold and hostile? Nothing is as it seems. It's time for us to remember again.
Saved - August 22, 2026 at 12:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m struck by the claim that our historical timeline is a lie and that, before we “arrived,” what happened here is far more fascinating than we’ve been told. Once you assemble the pieces, I see why those in control supposedly block the truth. Knowledge is power, and I’m taking it all back—this long video is packed with “signal.”

@benwehrman - Ben Wehrman

OLD WORLD MARATHON - 3 HOURS of Proof That Our Entire Historical Timeline is a LIE. What was happening in this world before we arrived is FAR more fascinating than we've been told. And once you put enough pieces together on this puzzle...it becomes clear why our controllers have spent SO much time/resources blocking the truth from us. Knowledge is power, and we are taking it ALL back. This is one to BOOKMARK🔖 if you don't have time right now. It's a beast of a video, but absolutely PACKED with signal from beginning to end, as we've come to expect from @MYLUNCHBREAK_, one of the all-time GOATs of modern-day independent research, in my opinion.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker opens by drawing parallels between modern construction expectations and historical claims, using Sweden’s “Ascarian Opera” as an example. They say Swedish royal opera construction began around 1775, was completed seven years later, and was allegedly carried out with limited technology (including donkey transport). They then argue that the “original” opera house was replaced, but claim the timeline results in repeating build durations: the second opera house is described as taking almost seven years as well. They further claim a fire story ties into older structures: during the destruction/replacement period, they say the Swedish national theater being used burned down, and they add that a renovation later made it “nearly impossible” to make out stairwell artwork subjects after smoke accumulated over 91 years. They use this to argue the building narrative is a cover-up and that the “new” building is actually the original. The transcript then shifts broadly into a recurring theme: the speaker repeatedly claims that mainstream history is inconsistent and that “fire stories” serve as coded explanations for older buildings. They connect this idea to additional examples across countries, arguing that construction timelines are implausible—especially where buildings are said to have been built quickly without modern tools, or where renovations allegedly take long periods but original construction dates claim short durations. They expand the argument with additional cases: - They cite a church in Sweden and other “misaligned” historical dates, asserting that sources give arbitrary completion dates. - They describe an inquiry to the “old Treasury Building on Spring Street in Melbourne, Australia,” claiming officials said it was constructed between 1858 and 1862 and that the original right side was built with dirt covering it; they interpret this as evidence that the building was dug out, implying it had been submerged due to land rise/fall. - They discuss Mont Saint Michel (1925 photo) to argue that railroad tracks in dirt suggest earlier ground levels, interpreting exposed structures as remnants from a prior civilization that were being reused. - They reference Mont Saint Michel again while asserting older technologies and construction methods were reused or reintroduced. The speaker then adds a large section about crypto and a wallet, describing Bitcoin as designed after the 2008 financial crisis as an alternative to banks and describing RumbleWallet’s features and onboarding steps. They later return to construction-history claims, maintaining the idea that pre-1800 projects with advanced-looking results are “nearly impossible” given the mainstream narrative. A major thread becomes “AI-generated patterns,” including recurring names, repeated themes, and repeated “fire” elements. The speaker claims: - Names and builder details repeat across many stories (e.g., multiple builders with the same first names, frequent “William,” “Thomas,” and repeated “sons” appended to companies). - Articles provide fire narratives as nods to an older layer of history. - Certain stories rely on construction images that they claim are misleading (for example, scaffolding around a building they claim is already completed, or photos labeled as construction despite appearing finished). Examples cited include: - Raca Palina (fortress) and other European sites, presented as contradictions to timelines. - Saint Anne’s Church and Shrine in Fall River, Massachusetts, where they claim a postcard indicates a “founded” date earlier than the start date stated by mainstream history, and they argue the listed architect’s biography does not match the alleged construction location. - Greene County Courthouse projects in Ohio and other places, where they claim historical timelines involve unusually fast completion, repeated fires, and repeated “sons” naming patterns. They also claim restoration articles imply aging inconsistent with the stated construction year. - They repeatedly argue that courthouses and other major buildings were not newly constructed but were “found,” repurposed, and then explained via mainstream stories. The transcript then shifts into the U.S. orphanage and education narrative. The speaker claims mid-1800s orphan asylum systems served as repopulation and social reset mechanisms: - They describe Josephinum in Columbus, Ohio, saying Joseph came from Germany, created/managed an operation to support orphans, and moved the operation near railroads for dispersal. They claim orphans were placed through churches and new facilities were provided rather than built. - They mention an infant asylum in Baltimore with tunnels under the ground, an asylum in Galveston, Texas said to be “haunted,” and patterns of decline/disappearance of insane asylums. - They extend the argument to Germany’s Kinderbewahrenstalt (kindergarten), claiming kindergarten was used to teach new social structures and test children. The speaker frames these as connected systems used to reset populations’ knowledge and skills, with German involvement emphasized. The transcript also includes multiple detailed building claims involving destruction/reconstruction cycles: - It repeatedly references Saint Peter and Paul Church at 666 Filbert Street in San Francisco, including claims that the first church is actually the only church on site, that the “second” was completed in 1924, and that the church was bombed multiple times later. - It describes Alexandra Palace (London) and its fire history, including claims that reconstruction dates and durations do not align with the timeline given. They emphasize a fire story shortly after opening and repeated rebuilding. - It connects Alexandra Palace to Crystal Palace through repeated naming and fire narratives, including alleged AI-like patterns in how the stories are written. Another major portion discusses Balboa Park (San Diego, California), especially the 1915/1916 and later 1935/1936 World's Fairs and associated structures: - The speaker claims the park’s land layout has “perfect” geometry and includes features (like a golf course and zoo) positioned to hide structures beneath. - They argue Balboa Park’s buildings show advanced architectural detail unlike what would be possible for mainstream timelines, describing ornamentation and sculpted columns. - They claim building names were repeatedly changed to confuse historical record searches (e.g., Casa de Balboa, Commerce and Industries Building, Canadian Building, Palace of Better Housing, Electric Building). - They assert restoration/re-roofing and facade “restoration” projects resulted in destruction or alteration of features from the older layer they claim existed. - They describe the “Museum of Us” building (formerly California Tower, previously Museum of Man), including claims about restricted public access and later reopening/repair work. They also address Balboa Park interior access restrictions and interpret delayed public access as an effort to hide features. In the later sections, the speaker returns to large-scale “great fire” narratives: - They focus on 1871 Chicago, claiming that if the mainstream fire story is correct, casualty figures (and survival numbers) do not align with the described scale of destruction. They contrast the implied death rates of the Chicago Great Fire with death rates from later single-structure fires. - They discuss other “great fires” including London and New York, and they argue that death tolls and the number of buildings destroyed do not logically match mainstream accounts. - They propose two alternative explanations: either death totals are much higher than reported or cities were substantially empty and the destruction was deliberate. They argue this implies large-scale destruction of older structures using explosives/bombs rather than normal fire spread. - They then cite additional city fire examples (Detroit 1805, Phoenix 1916, Miami 1903, Houston 1912) to reinforce the pattern of “low deaths” relative to claimed destruction. The speaker ends by asserting that mainstream fire narratives are cover-ups and that this episode reveals a systematic pattern of “fire stories” and timeline inconsistencies across many locations. Across the transcript, the recurring core claims are that many historical constructions are actually “found” remnants from a prior advanced civilization, that “fire stories” are used as narrative tools for removal/destruction, and that repeated name patterns and construction timelines suggest a mass-produced, standardized narrative structure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In Sweden, there's a building that is named the Ascarian Opera, an operant. And just as a reminder and to shine some perspective on this, remember that we have the Kluksinski Federal Building in Chicago, and they got to use power tools. They had proper construction training, and we were all here to see it. And that took us fourteen years to build. So now let's go back to this opera house in Sweden. Apparently, there was an opera house before this one, which is absolutely insane. And this is the original opera house, but I'm just gonna go with it so we can destroy this narrative. This is where we're told for the first opera house that Sweden finally had their own opera singer because they found a music academy. So Sweden figured out what music was, and now they need a place to show it off. And here is where things get very interesting. At some point in 1775, construction began. While living in huts and without a power tool in sight, the royal Swedish opera was completed than seven years later. They supposedly knocked this thing out twice as fast as our civilization took to build this pathetic box. And their way of transportation was a donkey. I thought that we were evolving and advancing. So let's continue. We are given Axel Johan Anderberg as the architect who designed this palace and constructed it all by himself, which is a total joke that they never mentioned that anyone ever helped these incredible master drawing characters that we, for some strange reason, can't reproduce today. So to show you all what's going on here, I'm gonna make this very simple. Since they make us bounce around from page to page to get this information, we are being told that Axel, the architect of the current opera house that somehow replaced the original 17 '82 Opera House, where we, of course, don't have any pictures of, and in my opinion, is the same building, was selected because he was the only person in the world that could get this job done. Oh, wait. What is this? There were so many people that could get this job done that Axel Anderberg had to win a contest against all of the other 17 master builders of Sweden? Can you believe this? Another contest winner with the architecture of the gods flowing through his veins. I would love to see where this guy lived. I'm sure it was a shed or a hut since this is what we were told about the seventeen and eighteen hundreds, not palaces and massive opera houses that last forever. So the first Opera House is done in seven years. No pictures of that one, and they demolished it because it was very easy back in the seventeen hundreds for some reason to get this type of building constructed again and even better than the first one. So they did it in their spare time, of course. So how long does this one take to get Opera House Number 2 done? Well, let's check out their website where they tell us a major key as to why I believe that this is the same building. They did not knock any building down. They didn't build two opera houses. This is the only one. The first one took almost seven years to build. How long do you think the second one took to build? If you guessed the exact same amount of time, almost seven years. Well, you're the winner. Okay. So I have a few more things to say about this opera house before we move on. Because, of course, we can't leave out the fire story that we have heard so many times and are the nod that these buildings are from the past civilization. During the years where the first opera house, which in my opinion is the exact same opera house, but during the years where the first one was being destroyed and the new one was being built, the Swedish national theater that was being used burned down in a fire. And one more thing to really drive this thing home for everyone. This so called new opera house underwent a renovation. They say that it was nearly impossible to make out the subjects of the artwork in the stairwell inside the building because of all the smoke from the outside of the building, from the city, accumulated in just ninety one years? So ninety one years, and you can't even tell what the paintings were on the inside because of the smoke from the city on the outside. What are they even talking about here? This is a clear cover up that this was the original building. This is Opera House Number 1, and those paintings were from the previous civilization. How much clearer could this get? And, of course, they we can then do. We'll see what told that we have located one of the oldest buildings in Stockholm. So this should be fun. And after what I just found, you'll all enjoy this one. You hear a lot about crypto, but here's the part most people miss. Crypto was created so you could actually own and control your money. After the two thousand eight financial crisis, Bitcoin was designed as an alternative to banks. So instead of a bank holding all of your money, delaying transfers, or limiting access, you are in control. And if you've ever had to wait for a transfer to clear, you felt that problem. Fast forward to today. Everybody in the world has heard of crypto, but getting started has felt complicated. That is exactly why I use RumbleWallet. It takes all of that complexity and makes it simple. Choose what you want. Bitcoin, dollar backed stablecoins, or even digital gold backed by real gold. No complicated setup. It connects with MoonPay, so you can use your credit card, debit card, or bank and be up and running in minutes. Start small. $10, $50, or a $100. It's not about the amount. It's about taking the first step and just getting familiar with it. And once you're all set up, you can even support your favorite Rumble creators. So do this now. Scan this QR code or click the link in my description and download Rumble Wallet. From there, can set up your wallet. Tap buy, and you'll be in the game. In just minutes, you can go from hearing about crypto to actually owning some. Knowing what we know, we know here that any construction project going on before the eighteen hundreds that looks like this is basically a laughing matter. We know from the AI chat GPT what kind of manpower and what requirements would be necessary for something like this to actually take place and be constructed and then go on to last forever unlike anything we've ever constructed today two hundred plus years later. So 18 Hundreds is a stretch. 17 Hundreds, basically forget about it. It becomes nearly impossible based on what the mainstream history tells us that they rode on horses and suffered in the winters. Pulling granite, stone, brick, and the rest through muddy roads would be insane. Then each horse needs 10 gallons of water per day. So you'll have all of these things that the mainstream narrative blatantly ignores all over the world. Every single time. They tell us that this church was constructed in the year 1300, over seven hundred years ago, before Sweden ever even wrote their first book, which happened a hundred and eighty three years after this building was constructed. It is so backwards. It's unbelievable. How can anyone look at this stuff anymore and say, yeah. That all adds up. It 100% does not add up. It's logistically impossible. It isn't realistic. This is their website. They literally just say it was completed around the year 1300. Could have been. It might be. But who knows? Now we all know that this is a lie. They're making up a random date, and people just believed it for years until now. So they say that seven hundred and twenty five years ago, they're over in Sweden knocking this thing out with perfection, of course. Now I've emailed the old Treasury Building on Spring Street in Melbourne, Australia, and what they emailed me back should get anyone thinking. I asked them a basic question, something that they should be able to provide since the camera was invented in 1816. And they tell us that this building was constructed in less than four years from 1858 to 1862. Now the question I asked them was, do you have any construction photos? They replied saying that there's a couple photos attached. Unfortunately, these are the only ones that we have from the construction. Now let's take a look at these photos for a second. There are some very strange things going on here. First of all, this building is not being constructed. It's clearly constructed. And I put an arrow in this photo pointing at the right side of the building because it's clearly being dug out of the dirt. This is not the way anyone would ever construct a building today or ever. And I wanna make this point very clear, so I sent the photo back to them with the arrow in there and said, just looking at the photo you sent over, was it originally built with the dirt covering that right side of the building? A reply that should shock anyone and at least begin to show anyone in the world that there is something seriously wrong with the history that we have been told. They replied saying that it was originally built with the dirt covering the right side of the building. Due to the rise and the fall of the land, the building is submerged. The rise and the fall of the land? I'm sorry. What? The south and east sides are fully exposed. So what we call basement, the lowest level, is technically on ground level. In other words, they had to dig this thing out of the dirt. What we call the ground floor is elevated above the street level. So from one side, it looks like we have three floors. And from the other side, it looks like we have four floors. I'm sorry, but this is insane. Take a look at this photo that they sent over again. There is clearly a digging process going on here. They are removing this building from the mudflood in my opinion, and they admit it without even knowing it. The way that the building sits today is exactly how you would construct it. You would build a foundation and then construct the building. You wouldn't build the building into the dirt, And I'd be willing to bet, after all of my research, that this building has a few more basements under the ground that we just aren't being told about. And before we go on, I've been wanting to show everyone this photo for a while. This is Mont Saint Michel in France. This photo was taken in 1925. Now on the ground, you can see there is a railroad track in the dirt. Railroad tracks need to be screwed into wood. If they were constructed in our timeline, just like this picture, you can see the wood because we constructed it. Now the train was basically brand new to the world at this point. So we should be able to see the wood planks in this photo. They are completely covered up by the dirt. The only thing sticking out is the railroad tracks from, in my opinion, the previous civilization, and we are reusing their technology. This entire area was dug out of the dirt. You can see where the previous ground level was here off to the right hand side. This is an incredible structure, very clearly a place that was built by the previous civilization, considering Paris City vision lets us know that this was built before cowboys and Indians. In fact, they tell us that it was built over one thousand one hundred years before cowboys and Indians. In the year 1500, very casually knocking this one out in the year 1500. Any year would have worked honestly. 1300, 1400 would have also been a winning number. Anything goes if you're the mainstream narrative until now because we all know that this is just ridiculous and a complete lie. The logistics in building this before anyone even knew how to make paper is complete nonsense. 1500. Wow. Oh, and did I forget to mention that this thing is in the middle of the water? Did I leave that part out? Well, yeah, it's in the middle of the water, and we are supposed to just believe that they had a great shipping company, an architect, a financial guy that would make sure that they had this all covered in the year 1500. Oh, and it, of course, lasts forever with zero issues and not one flaw in the construction. It's perfect unlike anything that we have ever constructed today. How does the mainstream history make any sense at all at this point? You cannot go from this in 1500 to evolving and advancing into sheds. And now we build motel sixes. It's crazy. How can anyone ever go into a history class again without laughing? The year 1500 was just the year of brilliance, I guess. Yeah. Right. These buildings are from the previous civilization, and more and more people are realizing this every single day. And once you know, you know. You don't go back to thinking that the year 1500 built massive structures on a cliff in the middle of the water with a train that just pulls right up to the front door. And I was on Google Maps just looking around and saw this city in Italy. And I went down to the street view, and I saw that they have this fountain. The whole city clearly was found, repurposed, and is being used today. And as we spin this camera view around, we are going to see a Griffin right above their front door. So we see the Tartaria logo all over the world. And then I was gonna show you these door frames. Look at the size of the people compared to the size of the door frame. The wood door is obviously our work. The stone frame is from the past civilization. The size of the people were at least double. Why build a door frame this big? Well, you would because the people were bigger. Today, we construct standard door frames at 96 inches for newer homes, which is eight feet. We can all agree this man is probably five foot ten, so let's say six feet to round it up. The existing door is double his size, let alone the entire stone frame. It's massive. It's at least 15 feet high. So I spin the camera around, and, of course, they are doing construction because what would these buildings do without our help? And you can see this lady here. Look at how small she is comparison to this door frame. You can see our small entrance that we have built here at the bottom. This is the door size for us. Why would a civilization that is struggling through winters, riding around on horses and wagons, go out of their way to construct a door frame that are 15 to 20 feet high. When we are supposedly bigger than they were, they show us civil war outfits where they're, like, half our size. Using common sense, the narrative is backwards. It's clearly lying to us. They understood construction and were very good at it. It lasts forever, and they built their door frames proportionate to their size, the exact way that we do. What an interesting city, especially when we stay here in this city and look at the Raca Palina, a fortress that was built in less than three years, like, five hundred years ago. How can the narrative get away with this? They can't have this technology and then go live in sheds and have cowboys and Indians too. It can't have both. Either humans knew how to build or they didn't. The whole Abe Lincoln being born in a shed thing is just nonsense. That was over three hundred years after they were knocking out this fortress in just three years. So in three hundred years, they forget everything, or are we evolving and advancing? Which one is it? In my opinion, these narratives are nonsense. They are lies. The dates are all over the place. Just because a building is built in a different location of the world doesn't mean the narrative gets a pass. If a cell phone is created, the whole world advances. If a plane is created, the whole world gets the plane. The USA supposedly broke away from Europe in the process of breaking away in the seventeen hundreds. Did they all forget their brain? No. This was the start of the worldwide reset in my opinion. An event took place right before this that started our entire worldwide narrative over, and we're seeing through their nonsense now. So this fortress is insane. And if anyone is there and can send me photos of what I'm about to read, please email me. Here we go. They destroyed a large number of Roman medieval buildings in order to build this fort, including houses as well as over a 100 tower houses, destroying gates and churches and monasteries. And here we go for the part that shows there is much, much more to this city, and honestly, the whole world below our feet. A civilization was here before us that was incredible. It turned the former city streets of the historic city center into underground passageways, which are now open to the public. Unbelievable. If anyone can get in those underground tunnels, please send me any photos you can. I'm also on x if you wanna send it to me on there. I am definitely adding this city city to my list that I wanna go to and investigate for this channel. And like I said earlier, the reset happened in my opinion around the time that The USA and the Australian governments were founded. So in the mid eighteen hundreds, the fortress was partially destroyed and rebuilt. But in 1860, of course, only twelve years after they supposedly built it again, it was demolished and the kingdom of Italy took over. I'm surprised that they didn't say that it burned down in a random fire since they love to say that stone burns down in fires, which it doesn't. So in 1932, they go down into these tunnels and destroy whatever was there that they don't want us to see as it would ruin their narrative in a second, and they call it a restoration when we know that restoration really means destruction and another destruction project in 1965. And guess what? They left us a wall to look at. Incredible. So I hope this clears up more for everyone, that the history that we've been told and forced to repeat over and over, generation after generation, is a lie. And they just throw dates around, and everyone just believed it for years. It doesn't matter what date they say. Nobody was there to verify it, and stone doesn't change the way that wood does over time. So if a building or, in this case, an arch is built a hundred years ago or five thousand years ago. If it was built in New York or in Italy, nobody would know the difference. So in this story, they're gonna tell us that this arch right here was built by people that were about one thousand one hundred years away from creating paper. Two thousand three hundred years ago, we are told that this arch was made in the second half, not the first half, second half, because they're gonna specific now. So the second half of the third century BC, which is three hundred years before we started counting years the way that we do. So then they restore it in forty BC. Not 41 or 42 or 39, but exactly 40, and we fully trust that. Oh. Oh, we don't? No. We don't. Especially when they can't tell us the logistics of a building from the eighteen hundreds. There was no restoration project going on in forty BC, Two thousand sixty three years ago. And yet again, we are given a doorway that in my opinion was not built thousands of years ago. This is possibly only a few 100 years old and shows the size that the people really were. The arch is part of a massive set of walls, which are 30 feet tall and 9,500 feet long, covering approximately a quarter of a square mile over three hills built in the year negative three hundred. Yeah. Right. In episode 47, we talked about the Stone Sea in Saint Louis, and we discussed that they are technology. And I wanna go a little deeper here and make a connection and say that in my opinion, these are from the past civilization. They are being hidden by this cafeteria that the museum doesn't even need since, like, 10 people are walking around it all day. But they clearly know the technology that these stone structures hold. I believe they recreated this technology, and I believe that the Saint Louis Arch is a much bigger, possibly much more powerful recreation of this technology being hidden behind the blinds in the basement. Where else in the world do you see these arches, and what are the odds that these are right next to each other? We have proven that they are attempting and seems like it's successful that they are able to extract an energy from the earth in this location. What is under the ground in this location, And what is the true meaning of the Saint Louis Arch? The patterns and repetition. We are getting closer and closer to the truth. We know that one of the nods is the fire story. We have found that pattern here on this channel, and we have also found that they create characters, fake names, and that it is most likely through AI because the repetition is overwhelmingly obvious. And we all remember from episode 47 when Henry Hobson Richardson was off Building F L Ames Gates, Memorial halls, libraries, and cottages. F L Ames. F L Ames. Well, we all know what F L A M E S spells. Putting the word flames right in the narrative, putting the period after the f and the l so that we can't search it. Putting this right in our faces over and over and thinking that nobody would ever see it, thinking that nobody would ever be locked into their code and that nobody would ever put their lies right on the table for all to see. Do you fully trust the mainstream narrative? Are you on the fence? Well, if this is the first time finding this channel or hearing anything about the previous civilization, get ready to have your mind blown. We are given the Saint Anne Shrine located in Fall River, Massachusetts. We are given the mainstream history where we are told the church was designed by Canadian architect Napoleon Barossa in the Romanesque revival style with construction beginning in 1891. Well, I have located a postcard from over one hundred and twenty years ago of this building, and there is a major flaw on the back of this postcard that I don't think that anyone was ever meant to see, and we're about to see it right now. Saint Anne's Church and Shrine, Fall River, Massachusetts, founded in 1869, which is twenty two years before they tell us that construction was just starting on this project in 1891. Not only do they give us the state of 1869, they also say that it was found or founded. We have proven in episode 35 that the legal definition of the word founded is not constructed or built. You do not find your home. You build your home. It is constructed. In 1869, they found this building, and they are attempting to lie to us in the narrative time and time again. This time, we can see the lie right on the table for everybody to see. What a horrible mistake by the narrator. It is 100% undeniable proof that the story is lying to us. With a total mix up, having this 1869 founded date on the back of a postcard that they thought nobody would ever see. This building was not built by people riding around on horses and wagons. This building was found. It was built by the previous civilization that had incredible knowledge and architecture skills and understood how to construct buildings buildings that last forever. So now that we know that this building was founded and the narrative is a complete lie, let's take a look into this architect character, mister Napoleon Barossa. And when we take a look at his biography, the character never actually leaves Canada besides a little vacation to Europe. If he is truly constructing this palace in Massachusetts, this would have been mentioned considering it's more impressive than anything we have ever constructed today. But the fact that they act like this is pathetic and not even worth mentioning, especially in a time period where presidents were being born in sheds. This should be alarming to anyone. They say his office is in Quebec, Canada, born in Montreal, Canada. Visited Europe. Founded the Canadian Journal. Doing more in Montreal, Canada. In 1880, finding the National Gallery of Canada. Him and his fellow artists are doing more in Quebec, Canada, then dies in Canada. Where is the part that he throws his cowboy hat on, saddles up, heads down to Massachusetts on his horse and wagon, and works for the shipping company Donkeys Inc. And knocks out a massive palace. It's not in the narrative because Napoleon Dynamite didn't do this. It was already found in 1869, exactly like we have shown. The narrative is fully lying to us, and we have fully documented this throughout the first 50 episodes. Now we have talked about the Samuel Hannaford and Sons in episode 24, I believe. And I thought I would let you all know that they also decided to knock this building out, the Greene County Courthouse in Ohio. And don't forget that they were just incredible. Their chisels just moved a little faster than the rest of ours. Beginning this project in nineteen o one and completing it in less than twelve months. The winters, of course, weren't an issue. They never were in the eighteen hundreds. Honestly, I would love to see someone in 2023 or 2024 try and recreate this project in less than a year. It wouldn't even be close, and we all know this now. So we might ask, in nineteen o one to nineteen o two, we were able to get these projects done so fast all over the world. It was so easy. What happened? Where did this technology go? Why do we not still do this today? The answer is clear at this point. These stories are true. These buildings were not built in one year. They were found and repurposed. They used the same architect characters from multiple buildings to attempt to explain them away. We lost this technology within the last hundred and twenty two years to construct massive structures in a year? No. Our timeline never had this technology, and we are being lied to. Just adding in primary features of 4,500 pound clocks that are inside of a clock tower that reaches a 145 feet into the sky with perfection, of course. Oh, and the 4,500 pound clock inside of the frame that weighs an additional 3,000 pounds and, of course, every hour, still ringing today. This alone would have taken us five years to get done. Considering it takes us, like, a year to get a sidewalk done, and our sidewalks fall apart in, five years. This building, on the other hand, with a clock tower and all, will be there forever as long as nobody touches it. In September 2022, we have an article in the Dayton Daily News where apparently the building needs our help. We all know that restoration really means destruction at this point. In my opinion, something happened within the last year or so where a lot of these buildings are being destroyed or restored, and we have a lot of episodes where we have gone to these places and documented that. The Greene County Courthouse will be getting a facelift. Oh, incredible. This fall as the county seeks to repair and restore and destroy the exterior of the historic building. A $322,000 project to destroy the outside of the old building, which is obviously one of Greene County's most recognizable landmarks. And this next sentence is going to show how old this building really is. The courthouse currently has some limestone that is spalling and in need of repairs. The definition of the word is break off in fragments. Now how long does it take for a stone to break down? You could say that stones decompose over many thousands and even millions of years. Do we all believe that this limestone is in just one hundred years, or is this building much older than we are told? I'd like you to comment below with your opinion, but you all know which way I'm leading. Incredible stuff. Oh, and, of course, they've wanted to do this for a very long time. I mean, how much clearer could this get? This building was not built in less than a year in nineteen o one to nineteen o two. They've wanted to fix the spalling stone for a long time. And I have to be honest. I don't even know if they realize what they're saying at this point, but they're actually admitting that it's way older than nineteen o one, whether they realize it or not. And, of course, additional destructions will be made to the courthouse that they just aren't gonna let us know about. Now this is all back in 2022, so I'm guessing it'll all be done by now. Considering it supposedly only took them less than a year to complete the entire building in nineteen o one to nineteen o two, and we're evolving and advancing. Right? Now while researching this, I thought Greene County only had one courthouse, which they do. But all of a sudden, I was sitting there with two Greene County courthouses, but they're both in a county called Greene. What is with the AI repeating itself over and over? Duplicates all the time. Is this how all the names were created for all the towns, all the cities, all the characters that they give us? Is this even how our last names were generated? It's all so strange. So we have the Greene County Courthouse that we just talked about over in Ohio, but we have another Greene County in Illinois with another courthouse that was supposedly constructed in less than a year. So both built in less than a year. And this one is even older than the last one that we just talked about. Built in a year from 1891 to 1892. And we all know that this is logistically impossible at this point. We have gone over this for anyone that is new here or for anyone that wants to revisit this. I think episode 41 is awesome at going over this. There are so many key factors that come into play when designing, preparing, constructing, and executing a building to perfection. You have to have everything go perfect. And even then, knocking it out in a year over a hundred and thirty years ago is insane. It's almost turning into a test to see who gets the joke at this point, both named the same thing and both built in less than a year. In an interview from 2014, the Greene County clerk and recorder says in an article titled Greene County Courthouse stands the test of time. Exactly what we've been saying here on this channel. And, of course, exactly how our construction that we only take ten months on lasts forever. It stands the test of time. Oh, it doesn't? No. It doesn't. So she says, we have done some rewiring and other things like that, but that's about the only thing wrong with the place. Knocking it out in a year. Good forever. Very standard work for the eighteen nineties because they just worked harder than us, of course. Just more dedicated, less distractions, and less code restrictions. Yeah. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it anymore. The three story limestone Romanesque revival style building will be there forever as long as they leave it alone. So in the article, they start saying that there were multiple courthouses here before this one. Because why not? And we all know at this point that this is the first courthouse. It's the only one that's ever been here. But I wanted to see what they had to say about all of these other courthouses. So the county was created in 1821. What do you know? They knocked a courthouse out in 1821 to 1822. Now we have talked a lot about reoccurring names, and this is not the first time we have seen this. I brought it up before, I'm gonna bring it up again. Episode 43, for anyone new here, is the best example of this. The AI is generating these names and these stories in my opinion. And here, we have another example of this. The courthouse was a long frame structure and was built by William Finley and another Finley, Thomas. So those names would be fine if we didn't have hundreds of examples of this. We would just say that they are brothers. The problem is that we know what is going on here. It isn't brothers. And I will prove this because in the exact same paragraph, we have Thomas Finley and Thomas Ratton. Multiple Thomases and multiple Finleys. The odds are 0%. There is no chance that this is remotely possible, especially with all of the hours and hours of documented evidence that we This has happened so many times. This is becoming clearer and clearer by the week. It's in every single city, every single town, all over the world. It's the exact same thing. In the comment section, you guys are all saying the exact same thing in your town where you find a fire story and you find the same thing with reoccurring themes and names. It's the same thing all over the world. These are AI generated names in my opinion where they throw a bunch of names into the system and it twists them a little bit, making each story basically the same thing, but just dedicated to that one specific spot. It's undeniable at this point. And then you have the classic half windows at the current ground level where there is clearly more to this building under the ground and most likely a tunnel system connecting it to surrounding buildings. Now it is time to go to Brazil, more specifically, Rio De Janeiro, where we have the National Library of Brazil that was shipped from Europe in three shipments and easily put together in the year 1810. This was a standard construction process in the year 1810. Two hundred and thirteen years ago and wrapped right up in 1811, one year. I don't even understand how anyone can even think to question this narrative. It must be a crazy person. Anyway, let's question it. The history of the National Library began on the November 1 in 1755 when Lisbon suffered a violent earthquake. Now it's possible that they had an earthquake, but, honestly, it could have been an explosion of some kind. So this is clearly, in my opinion, an attempt to find a way to explain why the exact same type of architecture style structures that are all the way over in Portugal are also in Brazil, which is a total of 7,695 miles away from each other. They are telling us they shipped this massive building 7,000 miles, and this was normal. I keep bringing this up, but it's to keep perspective on what they're telling us, that they lived in sheds, yet they could just simply Amazon prime a palace and get it put together no problem, and it's there forever with the help of their cowboy and Indian friends. This is actually insane when you put it all out there like this, especially when you see that they had to come up with a date and assign that date as the official founding date of the National Library. This is the date that they found it. Look at the size of this thing. This was shipped perfectly without a single issue over the sea for 7,000 miles two hundred years ago. Which shipping company was used? How many men? Which company put it all back together so that it would be there forever without an issue? Why are we not being told the information that we need to hear in order to fully trust the narrative? Well, because this never happened, in my opinion. And I found this photo from nineteen o nine where they're trying to tell us that this is a construction photo. Now for anyone that needs to revisit episode 49, this building is done. There is zero construction going on here. They are simply painting this building. The scaffolding is for the not building. You can even see the columns are all in place. The whole thing is done. There is no building going on here. How can they get away with saying that this is construction when it's clearly done? 100% for show and 100 for this photo. They are putting a brand new coat of paint on this thing and saying, look. It's brand new. Just DoorDash ed it from Portugal. Oh, and we all caught that. Right? This is a construction photo from nineteen o nine. But the problem, they told us that this thing was founded in 1810, a hundred years prior. Honestly, the narrative is unraveling so fast. It's incredible to see in real time that a fire broke out on 11/22/2023 at the Tesla Science Center in Shoreham. This is going right along with our fire narrative. It is 100% still happening today where this hidden group is destroying these old world buildings and calling it a fire. They collect the insurance check, and nobody is standing there with a wrecking ball, ready to be blamed at the end of the day. The fire, or as we know here, a demolition is the key to understanding which buildings are from the previous civilization because time and time again, we have proved that they do not give us the person or they give us the dumbest reason as to how these fires start or simply no reason at all. For this one, we are told that the cause of the fire is not yet known. And, honestly, they're never gonna tell us the real reason because we know what the real reason is. The building dates back to nineteen o one, supposedly. It is definitely earlier than that, but let's continue. Nineteen o one, and was the final standing laboratory of American inventor, Nikola Tesla. I'll keep you all updated if there's anything more on this, but just another eye opener that this is a very real thing that is still happening in real time. So nineteen o one, this building is built. Nineteen o two, Tesla moves in and gets all of his projects done here until nineteen o six. Are any of us shocked that Tesla supposedly worked in Budapest, a city that is well documented here on this channel, that is my clear cut number one city in the world when it comes to this research? What was he told in Budapest as the head of Budapest Telephone Exchange? What did he learn there and then bring over here to The USA to kick start all of the old world technology in this current timeline? The whole thing is very interesting. I have founded this photo of the Summer Street fire. And, honestly, these are brick buildings. Fires don't look like bombs went off. This is not the result of a fire in my opinion. It looks like the city was carpet bombed. It's just completely wiped out. It's a total mess. Fires don't do this kind of damage. I mean, it looks like the whole area is in the middle of a garbage site at this point. There's just dirt everywhere. There's nothing left. And remember, there was a great fire in nearly every major city. Check it out. I guarantee there was one in a city near you. So were these really fires, or were they being bombed to wipe these buildings out that were everywhere? Buildings that we have shown that hold dates on them, buildings that 100% do not fit in our timeline. It's incredible stuff. I mean, look at these photos. This is the result of a fire? No. In my opinion, there is no way. House fires do not melt stone and brick. It has to be close to 1,500 degrees to thousand degrees to melt stone. And house fires simply don't get that hot. Look at the destruction. The ground is really messed up. I mean, what building was in this location that they did not want us to see? Just knowing what we know. Seems like it was probably a good one. And just a few more photos here showing the destruction of these fires that started by a cow tipping over a lantern, but at least they switched it up. From horses and cowboys to the stone and marble shipping company, Donkeys Incorporated, to a cow just rubbing it right in our faces for decades until now. So we have an understanding of how these names, towns and buildings, are connected through the AI. There is a reoccurring fire theme. There are all these strange patterns where we have hours and hours of documented evidence of this. We focus on the old world here and the previous civilization and the hidden coded messages within these false narratives, and it all translates into today's world 100%. We know that the airports are so strange. And in my opinion, especially the big ones, they were previously there, and we have added on to them. We know that the Denver Airport is strange in itself, said to have many buildings that are under the ground. And when we look at the O'Hare International Airport and we have its location and see the address, we find something very strange. Again, coded messages, even in addresses for airports. Here we go. We see 10000 Bessie Coleman Drive, Chicago, Illinois with a ZIP code of 60666. We have a lot of interesting things to look into today, including giants, and I sent out a poll on x. You guys voted that you wanted me to talk more about orphans and go much, much deeper. Deeper. We visited the Mounds, which is clearly a massive pyramid right next to Saint Louis. We have boots on the ground footage in episode 45, and I thought that we covered the best parts of that story until I found this article titled the Mounds Complex, Ancient Open Air University of North America for teaching navigation and cyclic astronomy. Here we go. We scroll down and find this paragraph. In the eighteen eighties, archaeologists went into the site and found a vast amount of skeletal evidence in the mounds. Sometimes in deep chambers, far from the surface, they found very large individuals, achieving heights of seven to eight feet in stature. In a few instances, the skeletons had six fingers, six toes, and double rows of teeth where hair was still present. It was often red red or blonde in color. Alright. Interesting. I don't remember being taught of the six fingered giants. Well, let's keep going. Here in the very next paragraph, I think we find which group is the case. Think that's that's case. And And Indians and, of course, became the first director of the US Bureau of Ethnology at the Smithsonian Institute. Powell started deciding what we were going to learn, deciding that the Indians were the only people who had ever been in The Americas prior to Columbus. So he tells us that the Indians were responsible for the Cohequia Mounds. Very interesting. And, also, Columbus, in my opinion, was not a real character and just another story where if you think he was good or bad, you are admitting that he was real. When in reality, he's a fictional character to attempt to set up their ridiculous timeline. Are you ready to go even deeper? We have fully documented reliable accounts of the Smithsonian Institute personnel traveling to the 18 hundreds communities in Middle America to take possession of large skeletons exhumed from the mounds where they have this information documented in papers. Then we have Patricia Mason of Ohio reaching out to the Smithsonian Institute for more information to try to find these giant skeletons that were somehow gifted to this museum, or you could call it a burn pit because they told Patricia that the Smithsonian Institute never received any of these items. So we clearly have an operation here. We are starting to see who is doing what. We are seeing key players in the game and who is attempting to hide our pass from us. At this point, there were 100% giants in my opinion. The doors that we've seen here are massive. They aren't for us. Buildings are way too big. They aren't proportionate to our size at all. And when you find this article from 1891 where it states that the old Catholic temple erected at a hundred and twenty years ago in 1771, which was five years before The USA was even found. It was abandoned as a church. The old temple has an interesting history. Well, I'm sure it does. A temple from 1771. And wait. What did they say was 24 inches under the dirt at from episode 45? What appeared to be the outline of the temple was this temple and these giant bones. Here's so much closer to our timeline than we are told, covered up by dirt at some point after 1891. They could be talking about another temple located in the same town of But how many temples does one small town have in 1771? This is all very strange. Either this is the temple, and it was built in 1771, and this was common knowledge, possibly by giants, or, yeah, it was filled with temples. It's very interesting stuff. How many temples does your town have? In 1771, I guess they just had a bunch of temples all over the place. What is going on here? Especially when Saint Clair County, the county that is located in, wasn't even found until 04/27/1790, which is like twenty years after they say this temple was built. The mainstream history is a complete mess at this point. It isn't logical at all. The truth is smooth. It makes sense. There aren't holes in the truth. A lie is a mess and all over the place. And this is exactly why we fully trust the mainstream narrative. Oh, oh, wait. We don't? Now in Columbus, Ohio, we are given one of the most important narratives to this point to our research, in my opinion. We have the Pont ificial College, Josephinum, where Joseph comes over to The USA from Germany in 1867. Three years later, he becomes a priest and has his own church within a few months. And he gets to buy the house next door, of course, to support 12 orphans. And do we all know about the orphans at this point? Possibly a repopulation tactic that was going on in the eighteen hundreds. It's very interesting. Was it only 12 orphans, or was this one of the places that they send the orphans through to get them into society? Because who would ever question Joseph the priest from the eighteen hundreds? You know, the guy that just randomly shows up from Germany, has all the money ready to buy houses somehow to support orphans. It all checks out, of course. Simple stuff for Joseph. This was known as the Saint Joseph Orphan Asylum. It grew so rapidly for some weird and, of course, very random reason that five years after it began, Joseph moved the operation closer to the railroad, which is how these individuals would be dispersed throughout the country. So this is a paragraph of admission. We are being told down to the smallest detail how this operation worked. It would go through churches. They would bring a manager type over from Europe, call them a priest, give them a house, give them the resources to run these operations, purchasing new buildings with ease to run the program. So not only do you have the world's fairs that were a repopulation tactic, you had these orphan trains and orphan hubs where they would be dropped off and planted into society. The new facility that Joseph was just finding and saying was his. I wanna make that clear, he wasn't building anything. He was given these buildings. They were already there from the previous civilization. So the new building gave the orphans a training in the trades. So this Joseph guy was obviously sent with a purpose, to repopulate and teach to a brand new society, one that didn't have any skills. This right here is how you reset a society's technology level. The teacher is never in charge of what the students learn. This Joseph character is a teacher of a class. He is not the principal of the school. There are many schools. He is clearly taking direction as to what the students of the new society will learn. There were many classes like this one all over the country happening simultaneously. This was an operation. This went on for twelve years with zero backstory, finds a collegium, Josephinum. This massive college is just found and ready to roll. No clue where the money came mention of how many men were needed to build this place. Just found it, and its first class of 23 men began. It's unbelievable. This is one of the most important stories to our research in my opinion because it shows exactly how the operation took place. It's actually laying it all out there and shows us exactly how they repopulated these regions in The USA. It shows us the operation with the orphans, the teaching programs, and this was our base for our technological knowledge. Whoever controlled this operation from the top has all of the technology from the previous civilization and is controlling what technology we get to have, and they've clearly been doing this for a very long time. And for anyone that's on the fence, we have the Saint Vincent's infant asylum located in Baltimore where we have tunnels under the ground. This infant asylum was in use in the mid eighteen hundreds during the same time period as German transferred Joseph. And what do you know? In the early nineteen hundreds, the operation was done, and they declined new orphans. 1941, they changed us to apartments. And in 2015, they light it up and try to destroy it with a fire, but they fail. So three years later, what do you think happens? 2018, the building was illegally demolished without a permit. You literally can't make this stuff up. It gets more and more obvious. If you're still on the fence. Let's go even deeper. We have the Saint Mary's Orphan Asylum located in Galveston, Texas, where they tell us that this one is haunted. Now I've talked about hauntings before briefly. I'm not gonna say that there aren't any hauntings, but when it comes to these old world buildings, I think it was a tactic to keep people away from them. Just say that they're haunted, and it scares everyone away from investigating. So we have yet again another orphan operation going on in the mid eighteen hundreds, and I'm just gonna let you know that this is going on and on and on. There were so many orphan operations going on in the mid eighteen hundreds because this was how they were repopulating these cities. So where were all these kids' parents? Is this where a lot of our families originated from? Is this why the family trees in The USA almost all end around the same time period? We are told hundreds of fire stories through the first 52 episodes. We know that that is the key. And the nod that it's a building that was constructed by the previous civilization. The Saint Mary's Orphan Asylum. For anyone wondering where the parents of these orphans were, you might wanna check the other asylum, the insane asylum, because they were not going along with the reset. Here's a graph showing that the insane asylums are disappearing over time, and I wonder why. Good thing they cared so much about us in 1955 and 1965 because surely that was the fix. And then a fire had devastated the Saint Mary's Orphan Asylum in 1875. If anyone is still on the fence, there is room over here to get off the fence. And honestly, who would wanna sit on top of a fence anyway? So we have Ohio, Baltimore, Texas. We have all these towns and cities being repopulated. Brand new people, brand new social structures, brand new mindsets, and resetting what people are taught. This all happened around a hundred and fifty years ago. So this is all very new. This isn't thousands of years ago. Then we have another very interesting aspect of this in Germany during the same exact time period. And remember, we also have good old Joseph from earlier, also from Germany. So here we are given the Kinderbewarenstalt. And if I pronounce that wrong, I hope you all understand. This is where we are given kindergarten, another tactic to teach children the brand new social structures. What better way to trick people? Take them out their family's home and tell them what to think, and then test them on it. Failing the test will then lower your self esteem, putting a social pressure on children to agree with this new way of taught, or they will be called dumb and get an f. This is an operation. It's all connected, and it's designed to enslave the world's population. Year after year, we are all taught a false narrative. We've all been brainwashed into thinking that you are either smart or dumb based on a curriculum that holds zero value in the real world. Now who knows if this Fredrik Froebel was even a real character, but they do admit that kindergarten starts in Germany around the exact same time period that we're talking about, the mid eighteen hundreds. So I wanted to tie it all in with the rest of the world. This is a worldwide operation. This is not just The USA. We have a lot of things in The USA being controlled through Germany during this time period, especially the education aspect of it. And I wanna point out that, yes, we have borders and division now. We have so many countries in the world, and everyone is separated. And you're unable to travel to other lands unless you have a piece of paper that is registered and checked at the checkpoints. But who's to say that there even was a border in the previous civilization? Were there so called elected leaders controlling everyone, deciding what we can and cannot do? Could they have had a truly free life where they were able to travel wherever they want freely and not feel like they're invading someone else's territory? I would say, in my opinion, this was the world that was here before the reset. And something happened where this past civilization was wiped out, and their technology was stolen by a group, and some of it is now being sold back to us. Strategically, the good stuff is kept. Here we have the Saint Joseph's Orphanage located in Vermont. And if you wanna know where they get these horror movies where they show a nun doing crazy things, there's a dark truth to it. These movies don't come out of nowhere. They come from the last hundred and fifty years. Here in Vermont, in the mid eighteen hundreds again, thousands of children came through its doors. If you wanna demoralize, control, and manipulate a new population, make them completely forget their past, and never question what they're told, you would make them suffer. You would take them from their families, and you would ruin their mind at a young age. This is exactly what happened in the wars where all men between ages 21 to 45 were required to fight in World War one, which was in 1914 to 1919. 2,800,000 men drafted, 2,000,000 volunteered, where you get the term shell shocked to talk about destroying minds and making sure that the population is unable to focus on finding the truth. So we have millions of people in wars. We have more than 5,000,000 American children passing through the orphanage system in the nineteen hundreds alone, hitting its peak in the early nineteen hundreds. So it began in the mid eighteen hundreds and really ramped up to populate these cities. The American orphanage system included more than 1,600 institutions, partly supported by public funding, but usually run by religious orders, exactly like we talked about in the beginning of this episode. So I think we have now a very solid understanding how The USA was repopulated, how this operation took place, and exactly when it took place. I think that we now have factual evidence as to when this reset really happened, and I think that every episode that is released makes episode ten and thirty eight stronger and stronger, giving us more and more proof to our true history through forensic photo analysis. I found a massive historical cover up. I started by looking at photos from the late eighteen hundreds to the early nineteen hundreds. This specific photo caught my eye. Something was off, and that's when I zoomed in on it. The tree line has clearly been altered. It's much darker behind the trees where the editor got lazy and didn't wipe out the sky. And this was just the beginning of it. Because when I see one flaw, I know it's time to investigate. A forensic photo analysis uses algorithms that we can determine if it's a real photo, computer generated, or if it was modified and edited. So I sent the photo into the forensic photo analysis, and the results were shocking. We clearly have something in the sky that has been removed from this photo. Before I give my thoughts on what it is, I just want all of you to look at it for a second, and let me know in the comments below what you think that is. I'll also show you a comparison to another photo that I had analyzed to show that having a figure in the sky is not random and not normal. There was something here in this photo, and it's been edited out. It's undeniable. It's been removed to hide it from our timeline. In my opinion, this was an airship. We were never supposed to understand just how popular this free form of transportation really was. It was much more powerful than we could ever imagine. Here we have a castle. Oh, did I say castle? I meant courthouse. We have the royal courts of justice located in London, England, where for some weird reason, they just couldn't decide on a design for this project. There were so many designs coming in with master plans that they needed to hold a design competition, which was very common back in the eighteen hundreds because, of course, these eighteen hundreds people were just brilliant. It was very simple stuff back then. They just weren't distracted. They worked harder than us. And as long as they could draw it on a piece of paper with their feather, Donkeys Incorporated had the construction side of things down. Never an issue in the eighteen hundreds. So the competition began in 1866, a hundred and fifty eight years ago, and ended in 1867. After 12 architects drew up their master plans, something that nobody will ever create again today. They supposedly had 12 guys in just London that could draw this type of thing up. In 2023 or 2024, we have a total of zero people that could draw this up and get it constructed in the entire world, let alone just London. A hundred and fifty eight years ago, according to the mainstream narrative, this was, of course, no problem at all. Very simple stuff. So in 1868, they picked George Street. He was the champion of this contest. He went and got Messer's bull and his sons. Because in the eighteen hundreds, every single construction company in the whole world has to have sons at the end of it for some reason, going back to the great Samuel Hannaford and sons, and there's many other examples throughout the episodes. In fact, I would love to know how many times we found a company with sons attached to the name. In my opinion, this is another clear pattern proving that the AI is generating these names all over the world. Now just to put this all into perspective, if we are trusting the mainstream story only fifty seven years prior to all of this happening, Abe Lincoln, a president of The United States, was being born in this masterpiece. The USA supposedly broke away from England and supposedly beat them in the war. If The USA was that smart and could beat England in a war, surely an architect or two would have followed along to America. I mean, London alone had 12. Surely The USA would have gotten one or two. So in eighteen o nine, we have shed masterpieces being put together with perfection. And all over London, we have the interior, holding more than one rooms that include various meeting chambers, administrative offices, and at least, but could be more than 78 courtrooms. Additionally, there are 3.5 miles of corridors. And supposedly, have all of this being constructed even though we're told that the led a serious strike in the beginning of the project. Bull and sons had to find more master builders, which, of course, was simple stuff in the eighteen hundreds. There was plenty to go around. So they were able to get some from Germany, and they knocked this entire thing out with perfection. And it will last forever. And even though there were some issues finding new people to construct this place, it wasn't a problem, really. They got the whole thing done and settled in in just eight years. Are you on the fence? Should we go deeper? Not only was this done with perfection, the winner of the contest, George Street, as we have seen so many times before, dies before the project was completed. This is so repetitive where the winner of a design competition doesn't live to see the end of the project, and they're able to just bring anybody else in to finish it. Doesn't matter who. Everybody could do this back in the eighteen hundreds with ease. So then we have the church of Saint Mary, the Virgin Ivanhoe. And this will all tie together, but this was found around eight hundred years ago in the year 1220 or 1222, which, I mean, come on. It was the booming twelve hundreds. They worked by moonlight. Very busy people. Very dedicated. Lots of skilled hunters and gatherers without a power tool in sight. Actually, six hundred and seventy three years away from a power tool, supposedly. And, of course, the building will be there forever. They are addicted to lying because it is thought that an even older church may have originally stood here. I'm just surprised they didn't say that the first one burned down in a fire. The church was, of course, rebuilt for some reason in the year 01/02/1934, which was only twelve years after they say they found it. And they say that some of the original features survived. Survived? Wait. Why are they rebuilding it? What happened? Did I miss some oh, you gotta be joking. Four years after they found it, it supposedly burned down in a fire. To believe these stories, it would take some effort at this point. And I'm just gonna be honest with you. In my opinion, that isn't even the craziest part of the story. Let's go even deeper. But before we do that, I just wanna show you all the reoccurring AI generated names really quick. We have Richard Blackhead and Richard Seward. So we have two Richards. And, of course, Peter Desroaches and Peter Checkapork. So we got two Peters and two Richards. We have more builders in London that like to build with their sons, John Warner and sons with, of course, another John down here at the bottom, John Downcomb, where he has two wives, marries both of them, and one's named Mary. We have John Downcomb, and, of course, we can't forget about the other Downcomb, Thomas, and the other one William. And for the best part of this name generator, William married two people, Mary and Alice, spelled a l I c e. John Downcome. Guess who he marries? Do I even need to say it? I think we all know at this point what her name will be. Another Alice, spelled a l y c e. If you're new to this and on the fence, if the AI is generating these names, this is not the first time that this has happened. You're gonna wanna check out episode 43 and all the reoccurring names in that one. Are we having fun? Are we ready for the best part? Remember, when we are told about the George Street guy, you know, the guy that died in the middle of the 1,000 room palace project that was done in eight years, a hundred and fifty eight years ago, guess who the AI just had to add in here to try to explain this one away as well. Mister George Edmund Street. When in 1871 to 1872, he, of course, knocked out some Victorian Gothic revival style elements and built the north and south porches as well as a medieval style baptistery. Of course, he did. None of that was original, and this is totally believable. Oh, wait. It isn't? No. This was here long before anyone named George Street came around, and he did not do any medieval style construction in a year, a hundred and fifty three years ago. This was constructed by the previous civilization that was much more advanced than we are today. And now that we know that George Street is a pawn in their generated system, it's time to investigate even further. I have located George Street in all of his supposed projects. And remember in the eighteen hundreds, he was doing projects that we cannot recreate today in just one year. George Street was supposedly born in 1824. How old do you think he was when he was completing his first building? 35 would be shocking. 30 is insane. We are told that George Street got to work and built the Saint Mary's Church in 1848, making Street just 24 years old. And if you go on to this church's website, they say he was 22 where his sister, an embroiderer, heard of a Cornish clergyman and needed a new church built. Who better to ask than a 22 or 24 year old clerk? His sister, Mary, prevailed to give her inexperienced brother the commission for his brand new church. The rest, as they say, is his story. So, obviously, this is ridiculous. And we need to keep digging because wait. Oh, are they really gonna keep doing this today? What was his sister's name again? And what is the church's name? Both named Mary? Okay. I think at this point, we can be sure that they won't do it again. Right? No. No way. George Street. His name is George. What is the guy's name that is building the building that hired George Street? They're not gonna tell us that this guy's name is also George. If they say that his name is George, then I don't know what I'm gonna do. But what is reverend Prine's name? You know, the Cornish clergyman who intended to build the new Street Mary Church where George's sister Mary went and asked George Prine. I knew it was the AI before. I don't get shocked at things very often. This one is just so in your face. It's incredible. The good old Cornish clergyman giving away work in Cornwall. Amazing. I think we can do a few episodes on this first George, George Street, and probably a few episodes on the second George and all the Marys. Let me know if you want me to dig more into their narrative. So George Street, the first George, the 22 or 24 year old master builder. Remember, he was constructing this 1,000 room courthouse in London for seven years because he was kicked out of the script a year before it got done in 1882. And remember from our last episode, episode 52, this is the exact same time period where you have all this chaos going on around the world. Nobody is focused on these narratives. You have all these millions of orphans all over The USA. You have the civil war going on. You have slavery. You have all these insane high intensity type events going on all over the place. People were not looking into George Street and the hundreds of buildings that they were pinning on this character. In fact, even if they wanted to, it wasn't written in a book yet, and they didn't have the resources to prove anything. So they just had to simply believe it, and everyone accepted it as the truth until now. 1873 to 1881, George Street is pinned as the man in charge of the royal courts of justice for those eight years. I would love to know if he was fully focused on this project, one that we could never reproduce today in eight years. And we have shown the Kuluxinski Building in Chicago where it is a basic box that took our civilization fourteen years to build from 1960 to 1974. Or was George so good at his job that he could also get multiple other projects done at the exact same time? 1873 to 1881. George has been pinned and said to have had 42 other projects going on at the exact same time. Still believing the mainstream narrative? That we went to California and got some cool footage of some really cool buildings out there. So we will be talking about that and showing what we found. They tell us that the Linenwold Castle located in Ambler, Pennsylvania was designed by Milton Bean and built in 1890 without any details on its construction. It's just done in 1890, where Madison lived in the castle with his second wife, Mary, where after Madison died, the new people turned this palace into an orphanage called Saint Mary's. Mary, Mary, Mary. So we have a massive castle done in one year or less. And for decades, that's all we needed to hear for it to be true until now, where we understand that logically, that is impossible, especially a hundred and thirty four years ago, and especially when it's a castle straight out of the old world civilization's home improvement catalog. Here on househistree.com, in the middle of this story that has zero logistical details or anything relevant to actually building anything and just has a bunch of nonsense, like naming sons royal, retired business partners, and telling us how many rooms are in this castle that they found, they do give us a tip, and the tip is the Windsor Castle. The sentence reads, that Madison might have chose to model his castle after the Windsor Castle, which is the most popular answer. And it's the most popular answer among which group? Because that is definitely not the most popular answer to us, but they think it might be modeled after another castle nearby, and they all dispute it for years and years. And remember, it's all nonsense. We have no idea who this group is that they tell us that this is the most popular thought. What I see in all of this is one thing, the Windsor Castle. And I wanna see what year they say this Windsor Castle was built in because I bet you, it is connected to this castle. And this castle in Pennsylvania might have actually been built hundreds of years ago, if not thousands. And they will give it all away with this Windsor Castle connection located in Berkshire, Windsor, built in 1070 over nine hundred and fifty four years ago as a fortress and covers 484,000 square feet of living space divided into about 1,000 rooms. So something is extremely clear here. We are 100% being lied to about our history, and we all know that. But I have to say it out loud because one thousand years ago, they are building 1,000 room fortresses with ease. And it, of course, lasts forever. No questions asked. And today, we have evolved so much that we can't build a sidewalk without stepping in it before it dries. Now this is my opinion, but I can see them adding this Windsor Castle into the narrative for a specific reason. And I personally think it's to connect the dates that these castles are from nearly one thousand years ago when the previous civilization that had all the technology, had proper training, and had the logistics down. Instead of the opposite happening where we are told that there were no classes in castle building at the local community college in the year 1070, where they would go home to their sheds and sleep with candlelight, freezing using barn hay as beds, and then waking up again traveling by horse and wagon to pull stone and granite miles on a trail and getting this 1,000 room fortress done no problem. The timeline is clearly all over the place at this point. They could have told us that it was built in the year 1,045. It would have made no difference, and people would have just believed it until you start digging deeper, which we are doing here. Episode 41 is awesome at showing the proper logistics of a project if you're interested in that after this. The castle has, of course, 300 fireplaces and 379 clocks. Do any of our towns have any upcoming plans to knock a 1,000 room, 300 fireplace fortress out in the next few years? What about half that? No? With our modern construction, one thousand years after they did this, we should be able to do this with ease since they did without a power tool in sight. Supposedly, we have a better education system, so we are told. We have more knowledge than ever, supposedly. What is wrong with this picture? I would say a lot. Do you understand that something is wrong with the timeline? Something massive? Can we all see the lie very clearly now? We have been lied to about all of this starting around the year 1800 and possibly right before that, where everything in our timeline began and the old world buildings from the previous civilization are still here for us to see in every city with insane narratives to try to fit them into this lie where we are told that people from one thousand years ago were less than us. Worse off, then we are told that we have all this brand new technology in the last two hundred years. Everything is brand new. Every company was created recently all over the world. Is that not strange to you? And we're told this new technology has never been here before. Planes, trains, cars, phones, computers, Internet, and the AI when it has. And in my opinion, it's been here many, many times before. I believe that I have found possibly the clearest proof that these buildings are much older than we are told and clearly built by a much more advanced civilization that was here before our current timeline that we aren't being told about. We have the Pancharatna Govinda Temple where the trees, the grass, the weeds, the rest of it are totally overgrowing and covering the structure, which would take decades of zero maintenance, which would also mean that in order for this story to be true, the one that they're telling us, they would have had to build the building and then left it immediately after without it even ever being used. So when I tell you the mainstream story, remember this. This photo was taken in the eighteen hundreds by James Ferguson. This is the Pancharatna Temple. And when we take a look at the mainstream narrative, it's going to prove that they have no idea how to explain this one. A massive perfect temple located in Pattaya, India. And today, I wanna show you just how horrible the mainstream historians are at their job. They tell us that the palace is reported to have been built at some point between 1823 and 1895 at some point, but they have no idea. But when we go back to episode 50 and read the narrative about this arch, they knew all about the history and told us that it was constructed in the second half, not the first half, the second half of the third century BC because they, of course, know all about the negative three hundreds, but have zero idea what's going on between 1823 and 1895. Can you see how insane this is? They can't have both. Either you know what's going on or you don't. So it's reported to have been built. Reported by who? Did it get reported by Ron Burgundy? Who is the reporter for one? And for two, their report is pretty terrible, giving us a seventy two year gap. And on top of all of this, the photo has the number 73 written on it, which, of course, could mean anything and could be wrong. But let's pretend it's the year 1873 since, remember, James Ferguson, the man who actually took this photo, died in 1886. This would make sense. This would mean that the mainstream history is completely wrong, and there is no way that it could have been built at any point after 1873 since we have a picture of it here. And it definitely couldn't have been built after Ferguson's death in 1886. Yet they tell us that it could have been built in 1895. It's incredible and a clear lie since we have a photo of it and proof that it was here long before that and found with nature growing all over it, and here it sits today. So clearly, have uncovered more from the surrounding area that was also buried by nature. And when you zoom in on the building, this was something that was constructed in the eighteen hundreds by Donkeys Incorporated, and we can see that this is definitely the same building with the same three arches at the bottom. It's absolutely incredible. So I wonder if this is the way that a lot of these old world buildings were found with trees and grass all over them, but we just never had a photo of it. And this gets even more interesting. When we take a look at this place from the sky, this was not a random building sometime in 1800. And I wanna make that point very clear. We have a water system that has 90 degree angles surrounding this building. Not only that, but there are multiple temples. It honestly looks like a fortress. So we have these other structures within this area with this one being the biggest of them all. And we have some damage done to the side here, which I wonder if it depicted something before they destroyed it that they did not want us to see. Now I'm gonna drop this view down on Google Earth and show you the detail of this place and show you that this is obviously not from the last two hundred years. We have seen so many buildings from The USA that were supposedly built in the last two hundred years or even in our last episode when we showed the Windsor Castle, which was built one thousand years ago, supposedly, which is in perfect shape. In my opinion, this building that we're looking at today is thousands of years old, possibly covering not just one population reset, but many. I don't think the 18 hundreds were the first reset. I think that whoever controls the resets fully understands how to execute them and have perfected them over time. They've tweaked them, given us back less and less technology each time. That was once here before the new timeline is revealed, which is why our architecture gets worse and worse. In one hundred years, 99% of our homes with plastic siding without maintenance would basically be gone, which in my opinion is exactly what they want. So when the next reset comes around, if there is one, there's no proof that we are ever here. Here we have the Manitowoc County Courthouse located in Wisconsin where we have a building that is much older than we are told. And if you've seen the first 53 episodes, you'll enjoy this. The current courthouse is the third courthouse to serve Manitowoc County. The first courthouse was built in 1839. Thirteen years later, we are told that in 1852, this one burned down in a fire. Of course, it did. Because 99% of the old world buildings, as we know, hold a fire story. The fire story is the nod to the hidden group, in my opinion, that this building is from the previous civilization, and we did not construct this building in our current timeline. In my opinion, this is the only courthouse that has ever been here, yet they tell us the second courthouse was all done and wrapped up in 1857 on the same site as the present courthouse. Of course, it was. This is the same courthouse. In just forty eight years, we are told that this one was outdated and needed to be replaced because in the eighteen hundreds, they could be picky and build a new building whenever they wanted. A time before the power tool, they could just knock buildings down and replace them very easily. Oh, wait. No. They didn't knock the second one down? The second courthouse was moved a block to the south. So now they're just moving buildings around. After going through the trouble of moving this brand new courthouse that was supposedly too old, they demolish it to make way for a jail and a sheriff's department. This is incredible. Does this sound shady or what? Here we go. The courthouse that is a masterpiece and will be here forever was built in just two years, in nineteen o five to nineteen o seven, by another company with a guy and his sons, of course, because they can't seem to leave the sons part out. And then we get the old severe storm damaged the glass. The old world dome was destroyed by some rain. Sure it was. And then they rebuilt it with stainless steel, of course. I would love to know what that dome really looked like before it was destroyed. And what was it made of before they destroyed it? And what kind of artwork did it have? And all of this is not even the craziest part. The guy and his son's construction company were so good at their job that they could knock this palace out in less than twenty four months, over one hundred and twenty years ago. So their resumes should be long listed and hold other masterpieces. Right? Wait. No. What is this? George Rickman and Sons Construction Company only constructed two buildings in their entire existence and both of them in the year nineteen o six. So not only were they knocking out two palaces, so they say, but they were also doing it at the exact same time and then never built anything ever again. How is that believable at all? Over a hundred and twenty years ago. Well, it isn't, especially when they were located in different states. One located in Benton, Iowa. The other one located in Northern Wisconsin, which is over a five hour drive in 2024, over 300 miles apart. Yet they are laying the cornerstone supposedly in late nineteen o five, mid October, and completing it basically that same year nineteen o six. And if you're on the fence and you haven't seen the fire narrative before this episode, get ready to have your mind blown. We already know that the Manitowoc County Courthouse holds the fire narrative and was supposedly built by the same people in the same year, the Benton County Courthouse, the first courthouse where the county officers occupied two rooms in the supposed unfinished 2nd Floor before the building was destroyed by a fire the following year. Now the third courthouse was built in December 1856. The second and third courthouses were built on the same location as the present courthouse, the fourth courthouse on this site. At which point can we all agree that the mainstream narrative of our supposed history is a complete lie? It is the exact same story over and over and over all over the world where we get multiple courthouses on the same exact site, and they all light up in fire somehow, and they all have the same architect and his sons with zero details ever given to us on the actual construction process. And then you go look at the finished product, and it's a masterpiece. Something that will last forever and something that we don't recreate today and something that was supposedly built in one year or less, and we have never seen this happen. And we have so many more resources than they did, supposedly. And then whenever we're told that they're gonna go renovate one of these buildings, the renovation process takes multiple years and an incredible amount of manpower. And it only took the 18 hundreds and early 19 hundreds people one year or less. It doesn't make any logical sense when you really think about it. The Benton County Courthouse never had three previous courthouses, in my opinion. This is the only courthouse, and these stories are just that. They're stories. They're not true. A building that features a 112 foot central tower. It contains a four faced illuminated clock, a 1,500 pound b flat bell, and is topped to the dome. The two story structure sits on a raised basement. All of this, we are told, flat was built in a year or less. While the builder was off in Northern Wisconsin at the exact same time and both buildings holding basically the exact same narrative where they have multiple buildings on the same site and both buildings holding the fire narrative. Can you see the lie very clearly now? And are you ready for the most eye opening part of the story? The part that gives us all away that this is mathematically impossible for it to be true. Considering everything that we have talked about to this point, here we go. The Manitowoc County Courthouse was supposedly completed in nineteen o five when the Benton County Courthouse started that same exact year and was completed in nineteen o six. And the Manitowoc County Courthouse, again, holds its fire story in 1852. What are the odds that the Benton County Courthouse stood unfinished until the exact same year of 1852 when the county officers occupied two rooms in the unfinished building when it was destroyed by a fire the following year? The fire narrative is the key and the nod that these buildings were built by the previous civilization. When you know what you're looking for, it becomes extremely clear that the narrative is a lie, and these buildings have a hidden past that we are not being told about. Both fires happening a year apart, having the same builder characters with sons attached to the name, having the same year of construction. Both narratives having multiple courthouses located on the exact same site, located over 300 miles apart, built with perfection, and both lasting forever. And we all remember that George Rickman and his sons only built two buildings in their entire existence, which would never hold up in court since it wasn't like they were out there building seven Elevens. They built two massive palaces with perfection and fast. They would be the most sought after construction company in the world today based on what they did, And they did it all with zero formal training, which was standard back in the eighteen hundreds according to the mainstream historians. So two buildings for them, both in the exact same year, totally believable. No. And then we have the supposed architect, Bell and Dettweiler, where you will all enjoy to hear that Bell and Dettweiler also only constructed two buildings in their entire existence. Also, in the exact same year. And both buildings just happen to be palaces that last forever. How can this be possible? You would think that these two would team up for a few more projects, just for old time sake, and maybe build some houses for some people. Maybe a local business would be interested in hiring them. No? It never happened again. Just two massive buildings in the exact same year, and then they both call it a career. If I'm being totally honest, this isn't even close to possible. This is honestly incredible that this is what we've been told, and this is the explanation for these buildings. How have we all just allowed this for so long? Could you imagine today that Bell and Sons with zero backstory, both knocking out these courthouses and state capital buildings in the exact same year? One in Iowa, the other one in South Dakota, and zero information on their training processes. Every architect will tell you and every engineer will tell you that this is impossible. Where are the materials coming from? How many men did they have working on the project? Were the workers also trained somewhere, or were they just local prisoners like we've been told so many times? And then after all of this, they get these buildings done with perfection, and nobody ever hires them again with nothing on their resume. They were hired for two palaces in the exact same year. It just isn't logical, and both the architect and the construction company definitely would have built something else after these two incredible buildings. So here we have the saints Peter and Paul church with a location that you would think that they might want to change since it is a church located at 666 Filbert Street, San Francisco, California. I mean, what is going on here? When I saw this, I couldn't believe my eyes. This is the address that they give a church? Really? So not only is the address bizarre, so is the history where we're told that this is the second church on this site. The first one being built in 1884 and was destroyed by an earthquake twenty two years later. So the next one was built on the same site of 666 Filbert Street. And, of course, when you dig deeper, you get more than just an earthquake. You get the fire narrative and the nod that this building is from the old world where the church succumbed to the destructive forces of the nineteen o six earthquake and subsequent fire, leading to them demolishing it. How long did it take to construct the first one? Who was the architect? The construction company? How many men did it take to build the first one? Because this is the first church that is here today. This is the only church that's ever been on this site of 666 Filbert Street, San Francisco. And we know that now. And we also know that they want to destroy these buildings and have for a very long time because these buildings give it all away, that the narrative isn't logical. This supposed second church, which we know is the first church, but the second one we are told, was completed in 1924. Two years later, in 1926 and 1927, Saint Peter's and Paul Church was bombed four times. What were they bombing and destroying inside and on the outside of this church that they didn't want us to see? Dates? Artwork of the old world? The bombs were always placed at night, and no one was ever around to see what was going on. Bombs would go off every few months, and for the clear giveaway, that this, in my opinion, was a planned operation. Another bomb went off inside the church, January 1927, though there was a police officer monitoring the church. He was unable to catch the bomber. I've been here a few times, and I'm back now. We just flew out to California to show you all buildings on the West Coast Of North America that definitely don't belong in our mainstream timeline. Buildings that are so incredibly detailed that were supposedly built for a fair by a man and his chisel. Are you ready to have your mind blown today? Well, here we go. We are going to visit and investigate Balboa Park located in San Diego, California, a place that I've wanted to go and investigate for a very long time. Before we go to Balboa Park today, I wanna set it up so that we all understand what's going on in California. So we have the Saint Mark's Basilica in the year 828. Not 1828, 08/28, located in Milan, Italy. We have perfectly detailed buildings all over the world. We have all this incredible architecture for hundreds and thousands of years supposedly, and this is what they tell us. So when we find a photo from Los Angeles in 1860, we have unpaved roads. We have sheds. It looks miserable. The narrative is completely contradicting itself. You can't go from perfect masterpieces all over the world. And just because they aren't feeling up for it today, they build a shed. Instead of a palace, there is zero consistency. And this is the difference between the truth and fiction. A lie is all over the place. The truth, as we know, is smooth and makes perfect sense. There would be no debate, yet there is 100% of debate about the history that we're told. So our civilization has clearly lost the technology to construct in the Gothic revival style at this point in the eighteen sixties. And in the year 1860, the reset had already happened. So this is when I wanna show you a building in Los Angeles that was found in 1867, only seven years after this photo of these works of art. This is when they tell us that they moved around using so many buildings until they finally decided on this one. When we all understand that this was the first building, this building was here from the previous civilization, We have proof that they were constructing huts with perfection. Not a single screw went loose. They were clearly not constructing palaces. So we can see at this point that something is seriously off about the mainstream narrative. It's all over the place, attempting to explain how this building could possibly be here in Los Angeles in the eighteen sixties during the exact same time of the shed construction days. So they say they moved around using a variety of buildings without giving any detail as to which buildings these were or how they were being built or why they were moving to so many buildings, especially when I don't see a single building in any photo from the eighteen sixties. So they just settled on this one. This wasn't their first choice, but I I guess this building would be okay for them. Unbelievable. I wanted to show you this because you now understand what was going on in Los Angeles, the biggest city in California during the exact same time period. Because it's time to show what we found when we took a trip to San Diego, California and investigated Balboa Park, home of the 1915, 1916, and 1935 and nineteen thirty six World's Fairs. At that point, only had a population of 40,000 people. Yet, of course, they had these massive structures and were supposedly in desperate need of multiple world's fairs. Balboa Park is a 1,200 acre site. It's massive. You have to take a tour bus in order to see the entire thing. Now they tell us these world's fairs are the reason that all of these insane architectural landmarks are just sitting here when we all know that these were constructed by the previous civilization and have been here much longer than we are being told. The shape of Belleville Park's land layout is all over the place. It's a complete mess with jagged edges and oh, wait. Oh, it's a perfect square with perfect 90 degree angles, a perfect land cutout, which we have shown before, how they do this with golf courses and zoos, normally to hide something that was or still under this land that they don't want us to see. Oh, and, of course, right here, we have a golf course. Wait. There's also a zoo here? Of course, there is. The San Diego Zoo is also located here. So we get both, the zoo and a massive golf course in this perfect 90 degree cutout here in one shot. Incredible. The things that they can hide under a golf course or a zoo are unimaginable by dumping dirt on top of the previous civilization structures, and nobody's questioning it ever again. And a bird park up here, in case you're interested in that. Very nice of them. Okay. So we're given a list of museums that are located within this massive layout, 16 of them. We get 17 gardens and 20 attractions and venues. I'm gonna show you guys inside the zoo and see what's going on there. But first, I wanna show you what these buildings look like so we're all on the same page, that none of these buildings are being recreated today, and they last forever and weren't built for some fair. This one is the San Diego history center, which is built with perfection, perfect architecture, and isn't going anywhere, where they say they found it in 1928. Balboa Park is also home to the San Diego Museum of Art, which is just mind blowing that they're trying to tell us that this was built in just twenty four months, a hundred years ago. Does anyone see their towns getting ready to throw one of these together in just twenty four months anytime soon? Since it was so easy back then, twenty four months, you'd think we could do it now. Let me know in the comments, please. I've been checking for years, but I haven't seen any plans in my town getting ready to knock one of these out. And I'll tell you what, with our evolving and advancing skills, all of our tax dollars, you would think we could get one of these done somewhere in the world. But, of course, we get the excuse that these 18 and early nineteen hundreds people, they just worked harder than us. They're so much more dedicated. When Donkeys Incorporated put their chisels to work, they didn't stop for anything. Did they need food or water? Heck no. They got the job done by moonlight and did whatever it took. No training? No problem a hundred and fifty years ago. Well, we are just lazy. We are distracted. We spent too much time playing video games. Wait. This is ridiculous? Yeah. Oh, and we fully trust them that they have pieces that are from seven thousand years ago in this museum. In the year negative 5000. Not negative 5001. Not negative 4999. But, yes, exactly negative 5000. Incredible. And they're just on it when it comes to those negative 5,000 people, but can't give us any construction details from the last one hundred years, which is completely acceptable. No. We have seen William William Templeton Johnson pinned as the architect for the last two buildings. So we definitely know that there's something up with this guy, especially when he's out here winning the design competitions for palaces, which we have seen so many times, that there was no shortage of master architects a hundred years ago, even two hundred years ago. They were all able to supposedly get these drawings together. Everybody in the eighteen hundreds and early nineteen hundreds were just able to supposedly get these drawings together and get multiple buildings done at the exact same time. This was standard back the day, supposedly, beating six other architects to design three buildings. Of course, he was. Okay. So at this point, we know there's something major wrong with the narrative, and I wanna show you some of the things that I found. Right when we walked in and saw this structure, the whole thing in Balboa Park was set up like a town of an advanced civilization. You had the buildings, and you have this stage where there would have been performances. The problem is that it looks like it's from ancient Greece, not California with the Greco Roman style columns and the detail in the architecture. The fact it stands the test of time, no problem at all, and the fact that it's not even close to the only thing that doesn't fit into the California narrative. So we started walking over into what I like to call and what it feels like is the city center where you have this spot where everything kinda comes together like a downtown area. And you can, of course, see in the background the main attraction. They call it the museum of us now, but it's clearly not a museum, and we'll definitely be getting to that. First, I just wanna show you what I was seeing up close. And I know said this before, but please keep this in mind when you see this. Ask yourself, how many times have you seen any town construct one of these in our entire lifetimes? It is so important to ask yourself this because this destroy the evolving and advancing evolution lie that we have all been told. This is clearly created by an extremely advanced society, people that were here before our timeline, and they fully understood what they were doing. If this was just a mold, could you imagine the size of the mold going all the way up the face of this building? It would be something that would blow our minds today. This is in California, a place that in this same episode, we were shown that they were living in sheds, yet at the exact same time told that they were creating this masterpiece. At the exact same time. It's incredible. Now remember, this is all right next to each other. All of these buildings are, like, 30 feet away from each other. So here we have the Casa De Balboa, or at least this is what they're telling us it's called now because, of course, in the last one hundred years, they've already changed its name five times. First being called the Commerce And Industries Building, then the Canadian Building, and then the Palace Of Better Housing, and then it's called the Electric Building, and now it's the Casa De Balboa. And this all proves one massive thing that we can remember and look back on for the first 54 episodes and look forward to in the future episodes. And this is that they are 100% writing names on these buildings and messing with them to fit their narrative, where the new name is now engraved on the side when we don't see the electric building engraved on the side even though that was one of its names. So this obviously proves a lot. This shows that can we be 99% sure that they have changed the names to every single one of these buildings here in Balboa Park. And let's be honest, most likely all over the world, meaning that someone following the mainstream history would have zero idea of what any of these buildings were ever truly created for, which is exactly what they want. In my opinion, these buildings are from the previous civilization, and this is so clear at this point. The detail columns are on nearly every single one of these buildings. We have perfect grapes sculpted onto these pillars with leaves intertwined into it. Not a single mistake all the way up. And you go inside, and we have this courtyard with arches all the way around the whole building on multiple floors. Everything was just perfect. And, honestly, it all looked brand new, which if our current civilization built this, there is no way that it would look like it was constructed two weeks ago. We would have had to restore this place like 15 times. Look at our roads as an example. They last ten months, and then we need to take five years to repair them again. Here we have yet another building that looks like it was chiseled by by the gods. We have two balconies built into the front of this thing. We have an incredible window in the middle. The detail is mind blowing. If anyone has the chance to go here and see all of these buildings in person, I highly suggest doing that with possibly the biggest giveaway that these buildings are from the old world and built by a much more advanced civilization that was wiped out and erased from the history books and completely taken out of our time line. When we zoom in on the front of this building, right above the sign that reads its new name, Casa Del Prado, you can see that this building had something written on it that we're not allowed to see today. This section right here was a plate. It was a stamp that told us the true narrative of this building, in my opinion. And they have clearly covered it up and scratched it out so that the building now fits their new timeline and their new narrative. And when you know what to look for, you understand what is going on with these buildings. You know that this is the kind of stuff to look for. It's something that we were blind to before, and now it is so clear. And once you know, you know. You don't go back to not knowing. We kept going deeper into this place. There was just more and more incredible buildings. You have this fountain, and right next to it is the San Diego Natural History Museum, where we have the oldest scientific institution in Southern California and the second oldest West of the Mississippi River, where we are, of course, told that it was found on 10/09/1874. They tell us that they moved from building to building, repurposing buildings. The museum even occupied three different buildings at one time, but none of them, of course, were up to their standards in 1917. So they moved again that same year. But in 1920, they wanted to move yet again to the Foreign Arts Building where they kept remodeling. And when I say remodeling, I mean destroying because we all know that remodeling or restoration really means destruction. So they're all done destroying that building. So on to the next one, of course. The Canadian Building was the next one on the list for a good destruction project. Got this done in 1922. So in 1925, a nearby fire, of course, raised concerns. They need to throw the fire into the narrative all over the world. It's just incredible. It's in all of these buildings' narratives, and we have shown this so many times. They throw William Templeton Johnson right back into the narrative of yet another one of these old world buildings using the same character to explain away these structures that do not fit into our current timeline. So 1932, they tell Templeton to get this job done, to build a building that lasts forever. Get it done. And make sure to give us zero information about the actual construction process. How many men? Where are the materials coming from? 1932, they hire him. Right in the middle of the Great Depression, so we can't leave that out. But, of course, that's not gonna stop William the Great. He gets this place done in the beginning of nineteen thirty three, January. Meaning from some point in 1932 to January 1933, this thing is done during the Great Depression, and it's here forever. I'll be the one to say it. That story is logistically impossible. We have, in my opinion, clear proof in episode 41 that this is complete nonsense, and a construction project like this would never get done in less than a year during this time period. So they go through, like, 10 buildings, destroying all of them and saying they're restoration projects, and then whip this masterpiece together in a year. It must have been nice back then. Unbelievable. I also mentioned that we went to the San Diego Zoo, which is also located on this site. And it was honestly the weirdest zoo I've ever been to in my life. This was definitely the coolest one overall if you're just a fan of zoos because you're just able to be right next to the animals, obviously, a safe way. But you would go down, like, 200 feet to see all these animals, down a bunch of steps. This is in my opinion and just my thoughts on it, but it felt like it was all built on top of a structure, and they were just putting these animals all around it because the rest of the area was relatively flat. From all of my research and everything that we know about zoos and golf courses, hiding old world buildings, and more. This is just my personal take on it. If anyone's ever been there, you'll know what I mean. But it was really cool. We were able to see the building that they now call the Museum of Us, which is the main attraction, San Diego, California. We went and saw the Museum of Us, which is the new name since we all know that they have changed the names to all of these buildings many, many times. It was originally called the California Tower. This is what they tell us and most likely was named something before that. Because before it was called the Museum of Us, it was called the Museum of Man, and this was changed in August 2020. So they are still changing these old world buildings names even to this day. And this is an attempt to make it extremely confusing for someone that is following the mainstream history to ever go all the way back and find the truth. Because once you find the original name of the building, you can then dig into the narrative. But when you throw the new name into the search box, it comes up with everything that's happened with its new name, the new history story or his story. This building serves as the entrance to Balboa Park. It is 200 feet high with a bell that chimes every quarter hour, and this gets very interesting when we see that public access to the tower had been closed since 1935. You really can't make this stuff up. Locking the doors to the public in 1935. Because, of course, there's nothing to see here. And in 2015, they begin the process to allow this. But before I read this next part, remember, they supposedly built these entire buildings with perfection over a hundred and ten years ago in less than twenty four months, and we showed this in our last episode. So here we go. The process began to allow us to all be able to look at the tower again because they wouldn't hide anything. Right? So the process began in 2015, and they need to do some work on it first to make sure that it's all ready for us to see again. The work included making it wheelchair accessible. Okay. That's fine. But then there are, of course, additional things that they are going to do to the building. Architectural and engineering services to evaluate and restore. Restore. There's that word again. We know here that restoration is really destruction. This building was perfect, exactly like we have seen when we went to the Pasadena City Hall in episode 33, when it survived perfectly fine for decades. And then they randomly shut it down to make it earthquake proof. And the repair company got a golden ticket for their efforts when Pasadena has recorded 6,943 earthquakes since 1931, so the building obviously didn't need our help. And I'm just gonna throw this in here before I forget because this lines up with what we're saying perfectly, that everything was given back to us since 1776, including documenting the weather. So for thousands of years, we are told that no weather forecast was ever observed. Well, leave it to the eighteen sixties. Donkey riding cowboys that were, of course, suffering in sheds, but also had castles to get this done no problem at all. Okay. Now let's continue. To evaluate and restore the highly ornamental cast stone facades and complete reroofing and repair of the tile domes. So in my eyes and in my opinion, based on everything that we know and have seen to this point, everything that they just listed in this paragraph that they supposedly fixed up before allowing us to see it for eighty years having it locked away from us, the public. Every single one of these things that they just named were destroyed or dramatically changed to fit into the mainstream narrative. There was something in here that we were not supposed to see. It was locked away. It would have totally changed the mainstream narrative of Balboa Park or possibly the rest of the world with this building being the main attraction and the entrance to the park. There was surely something important inside this building, and it was definitely not built to be a museum. So we know that these buildings were constructed in less than twenty four months, like we have said and shown. So this whole fix up project from the point of deciding that it needs to be fixed up in 2015 to the completion date of the destruction. It better have been faster than the people of a hundred and ten years ago since the 2015 people aren't building the entire building, and we are, of course, evolving in advance. Wait. No? What is this? It took them sixty months just to destroy this place? I mean, repair? It was completed in 2020, taking them a total of five years to complete the project. And they finish it off with a nice gesture, saying that they, of course, preserved the tower's exterior. So nice of them. Alright. So at this point, we fully understand that they have destroyed anything at this site of Belle Ballpark that would have hands down given the old world away to us. Any depictions, any dates, all of that. And we know from our last episode, episode 55, that they defaced the plane on the front of this totally average, very easily constructed building. We also know that they are destroying destroying and hiding things from the public for eighty years, which we have shown today. And this isn't sketchy at all. Well, actually, it is. We are also told of the buildings that still remain at Bulbara Park from the exposition. Of the buildings that still remain, so we also know that they have destroyed a lot of the buildings from Balboa Park, removed them completely from our timeline because these types of masterpieces were very easily constructed in the '18 and the nineteen hundreds. This type of construction was very bland and was a simple upgrade from their shed homes that they would go home to after building with their horses and wagons. And, of course, these buildings were nothing like the incredible Kletzinski Building currently located in Chicago that took our civilization fourteen years to complete with its perfect 90 degree angles. It's incredible stonework. Oh, there wasn't any stone? No? Okay. Well, then it's perfect marble. What? Wait. No marble either? No. It's a perfect box that took fourteen years to build when we were all watching and real documentation was taking place. So what happened to all these buildings that they destroyed? Do you all remember when I said in episode 55 that zoos and golf courses hide buildings? They hide structures. Do you remember when I said that it felt like I was walking down something that was hidden and the animals were placed around something. Do you wanna see what I'm talking about? Are you ready? The buildings were eventually absorbed by the San Diego Zoo, and this is coming straight from the San Diego History Center website, absorbed by the zoo. Let's continue. Remember that in 1935, they shut the California Tower down or the Museum of Oz, and the public was no longer able to see inside. Two years before that, buildings south of the El Prado were gone by 1933, besides two. So there was, in my opinion, without a doubt, a clear operation at this time to hide this park from the public, to rewrite its history, and make it fit into their mainstream narrative. Because in 1923, they knocked down the Sacramento Valley building eight years after the exposition. This building was outdated? No. And we all know about the fire stories by now. And if you haven't, get ready. The fire stories are the nod to the hidden group that these buildings are from the old world. They were built by a previous civilization. A house fire does not burn down stone, and it doesn't burn down marble or brick. It simply doesn't get hot enough, and we have shown this. The Southern California County's building burned down in 1925 right in the middle of all of these other buildings getting knocked down. So they just randomly have a fire? Of course, they do. After what we know about the fires, this is normal and acceptable? No. No. It's not acceptable. So they give us the fire story, and then at the exact same time, rip all these other buildings down. And then at the same time, they make one off limits for eighty years to the public. And we're just supposed to trust this story? We all understand that the hidden past is that an extremely advanced previous civilization constructed these buildings very easily. A civilization that we are not being told about. A civilization that had all of the technology that we have today and much more. They had phones, TVs, planes, trains, artificial intelligence, and much more. All of these things are being given back to us since 1776, in my opinion. If you're interested in learning more about that, we have episode ten and thirty eight that talk all about this. We are being lied to about these narratives with fake characters, fake construction companies that build two massive buildings, and then never build anything ever again with zero training, of course, changing buildings names to attempt to trip us up in the research, and that's not gonna work. They repeat names with the AI generated stories and on and on. So 1933, ten years after they tore down the Sacramento Valley Building, eight years after the fire story, they tear down two more buildings at Balboa Park, the San Joaquin Valley and the Karen Tulare County's building. So here we are given a construction photo of the varied industries building, which shows us the incredible construction process. Just look at those workers go. Look at all of the equipment, the dedication, never taking breaks, working by candlelight, no distractions. It shows us all of the men. It shows us wait. It shows us a building that's done? It this thing is done. This is a completion photo. But according to the city of San Diego, this is a construction photo. I mean, this is honestly equivalent to me going into the road right now and turning around and taking a picture of my house and telling everybody that it's a construction photo. This is not a construction photo. Where is construction? And it gets even weirder when we look at the narrative, where in the beginning of its narrative, they named it the Agriculture And Horticulture Building, and then they switched it a year after the exhibition in 1916, which is normal. No. They switch it to the foreign And Domestic industries Building because it's a repurposed building. It's repurposed from the old world because the previous civilization did not build this building to have it changed purposes over and over. They built it for a reason, and it was not to be a foreign and domestic industries building. This is the same thing where The USA is the land of the free. Yeah. They got a lot of free buildings that were located on their land in 1776. So it's getting a lot clearer now. And, of course, the next sentence proves what we're saying here, that all of these buildings located in Balboa Park were found and repurposed. All of the names were switched from the original name over and over, which I believe is the case with all old world buildings. None of them were originally a bank. They weren't post offices. They weren't capital buildings. This is a worldwide operation, and these stories are just that. They're stories. When the name of this building has changed many times since it was found, naming it the County Fair Building, the Food And Beverage Building, and on and on. And, of course, this was just your average food and beverage building over a hundred years ago, where we are told that the facade looked like the entrance to a church, and this church look was reinforced because it had the appearance of a bishop in a medallion above the central door and a cross in the starburst medallion. Okay. So this place was obviously incredible, and its original purpose is much different than what it's used for today, just like all of these other buildings. So in 1970 to 1971, they destroyed this building in a reconstruction project. And, of course, the new one did not replicate the original. Now remember, World War one was in 1914. This exposition was in 1915. People were not concentrating on the narrative and all of its lies. And even if they were, how were they gonna tell thousands of people about it? It just wasn't possible. So what happened to this building? Well, the people of San Diego were at a crossroads. They were in a bind with what to do with such a pathetic temporary building because we're always told that these buildings were just temporary. Right? But they last forever if they just left them alone with incredible architecture. What would they possibly use it for? Well, one year after the exposition in 1916, they built this building and now military needed the space, so the building got to stick around where they used it as a barracks and a post office. And what do you know? This building was also damaged. The money was, of course, not enough to fix it, so it continued to deteriorate. I wonder what a lot of these wars are actually used for. They wouldn't be an operation to destroy the old world, would they? Remember when we were told that they stopped allowing the public into the California Tower in 1935? Well, the mainstream history just can't put their finger on why the Farm Bureau discontinued the use of Balboa Park for its county fair in 1931, just four years before the public was no longer allowed to go inside these buildings. Well, I would say that we know exactly why they didn't want to hold any county fairs here anymore at Balboa Park, and this wouldn't be an operation without a second exposition at the exact same location of Balboa Park. This one being held at the exact same year of 1935. It's incredible. Clearly, they have found something major that went against their narrative, and they needed to run it back a second time. So in 1914, we get World War one. One year later, 1915, we get Balboa Park exposition number one. 1935, we get Balboa Park exposition number two. One year later, 1936, we get World War two, where they now have yet another name for this building, Building 212, used now by Red Cross, while the Navy yet again modified the interior. Are you still on the fence? Well, there wouldn't be another no way. This is so clear at this point. The San Diego Aerospace Museum moved into the building briefly in September 1961 before transferring its exhibits across the street to the Electric Building in 1963 where they stayed until a fire in 1978 destroyed the building. Now I have a lot to share, and I think we have a solid understanding at this point that the narrative surrounding Balboa Park has consistencies with what we've seen across the world. Speaker 1: An inspiring story, the history of this building you see behind me, which was a gathering place, a popular one for people, and then it burned to the ground. But like we're seeing now in Paris, the community came together to save it. In 1978, it too was destroyed by fire. It's now has been one of the great regional theaters of the world. The old Globe Theater was built in 1935 for the California Pacific International Expo and quickly became a popular San Diego landmark. That arson fire in 1978 took the building, but not the fighting spirit of those who loved what it meant for our city. It's settlement home. And we'll build it again. Speaker 0: The narrative holds multiple fire stories. There are so many destroyed buildings within such a short time frame, the same years, basically. It is incredible when you know what to look for. So it's time to go to the East Coast Of The USA, Buffalo, New York, where we will find the Dennis Building and yet another building that holds multiple names. The Dennis Building, the Glenney store or Crockery store, the Glenney Building, and the Stanton Building, and yet another building that, of course, holds a fire story in nineteen o five. And not only that, but we also get the reoccurring names. Yes. It is possible for him and his sons to have the exact same name. But when we have seen this in so many narratives about these old world buildings where both brothers marry somebody named Alice, and their mom is also Alice, and their dog, and their cat, and their hamster that they found at Alice Pet Store, and the building is also named Alice. And this has happened hundreds of times where the AI is generating these names over and over. And then it becomes so clear that these mainstream narratives surrounding these buildings are AI generated, and they are produced on a mass scale, which is why so many names are reoccurring. The fire story is in nearly every single one of them and on and on. It also shows how these narratives could be completed so fast, and this really wouldn't be that difficult to produce in such a short time frame. You just throw in the parameters that they want covered in the narrative, and the chat GPT can do it in two seconds. We all know here that the chat GPT didn't just come out. It's not brand new. We know this. It's been here before for a very long time, and the hidden group has had it. We have shown this in previous episodes, and it's definitely something to point out and keep in mind for the future because we have William h Glenney where he has a son with the same name William h Glenney. And like I said, it wouldn't be weird, but we have seen this so many times. Now we are told that modernization of the Ground Floor has destroyed any identifying plaques, and it is not known if the building was the product of a local manufacturer. So right here in the narrative, they are admitting that they have no idea who built this place, and they are also admitting that our civilization had destroyed the plaques that once said who constructed the building. This is incredible. So we get a very detailed construction story here. Oh, wait. No. No. We don't. We also get a construction team that's been shaved off the side of the building and a history that tells us that it was built in 1873. Does this mean twelve months and it's done with zero details? But we are supposed to just trust it. Right? And we also get the fire story in nineteen o five. We're gonna stay in New York and go even deeper into this and just hammer it home. For anyone that's on the fence, I think this will help you get over. Our Lady Of Victory Basilica located in Lackawanna, New York, where the narrative begins with zero waiting around with them just handing us the nod right now. We're in 1916, a fire seriously damaged Saint Patrick's Parish Church in Lackawanna, New York, and they tell us that father Baker just needed to replace that one. The one that has zero documented evidence, that it was ever even here. So in 1921, they knocked down a building that has no proof that it was ever even there. And four years later, this one that we see today is just there forever. It's very simple stuff a hundred years ago. So we get the fire nod again. And in 1941, we, of course, get another destruction story where a violent lightning storm causes significant damage to the new building's twin towers, more twin stories in New York. So they had to destroy that part of the building and use the powerful lightning of 1941 as an excuse. But, of course, after 1941, they never had to worry about the lightning ever again, which is normal and acceptable. No. And I'm gonna show you again that this building is from the old world, and they destroy it with these refurbished projects, restoration and the rest. Like we have talked about a lot today, they say that Baker died and Joseph takes over. The first thing that Joseph wants to do is take charge of a refurbished project where he has the marble towers replaced. What in the world is he doing taking marble towers off of this building? That is completely backwards. You would not take marble towers off of anything. You would put marble towers on a building if you could. This is a clear operation to diminish the work of the old world and replace it with copper. And what do you know? The copper that he put on there turns green and needs to be replaced with a new one. I love asking this because it really proves the point that these buildings are from the old world, and these narratives are ridiculous. But do any of our towns anywhere in the world have any upcoming plans or ever in your life, have they ever had any plans to knock one of these out or anything close to it in just four years. My town did come close when they built the Dunkin' Donuts a few years ago. And let me tell you, it was a Dunkin' Donuts built by the gods of the twenty first century. It is perfect. The detail in the stonework is incredible. The architecture, it's just perfect. And it only took them five years to plan it out and get the whole thing done. Do you remember when in episode 36, we went and saw the 132 foot tall Tower Castle, the Altgeld Hall, located on the campus of the University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign, a castle that was constructed in less than a year over a hundred and twenty five years ago, which we documented in episode 41, that this construction timeline is logistically impossible, especially in that time period. We also know that the building is going through a destruction. Oh, I mean restoration project. Buildings from the old world, the previous civilization, were built to last lifetimes, hundreds of thousands of years. They definitely don't need our help the way that our modern construction does, where our roads are falling apart after five years. And these mainstream stories have many hidden clues just waiting for us to find them, and I believe that we just did. The Altgeld Hall with the name Altgeld. This translating in German to Old money with a clear nod to the Old World that the name of the building is literally Old Money. And I believe that we just took this research to a whole another level where we now understand that they are using multiple languages to hide these codes within the narrative. And this is going to unlock so many doors for us. So we have the building that is named Old World Money where there probably was old gold stashed inside when they founded it. And this, of course, isn't the first destruction project because in 1956, only fifty nine years after they supposedly built this castle, it got its last big renovation. A big renovation fifty nine years after it was built. I wonder what they removed from this castle that they did not want us to see in 1956. And this is when we read the title of the article proving that we are correct, that there are things in these buildings that are hidden to us, that they are destroying with these renovation projects, where most of the public don't fully understand what's inside or outside of these buildings. That's just not revealed to us. These structures were not built in one year. By the horse and wagon community, these structures exposed the old world. A civilization that was so advanced that it would blow our minds, and they weren't here thousands of years ago. In my opinion, they were here only a few hundred years ago, and all of their buildings, their castles, all of their work is left behind for us to see. And, of course, we're not allowed to go inside the old money hall and be a part of these revealings of the intricate decor and gold leafs. A gold leaf? Old money? Old gold? Project. What did they find that triggered a renovation project? Revealing gold leaves. I think we know. If I ever find any new information like we did today with the old money haul about any other buildings that we've covered, I'm definitely gonna share it with everyone here. Now for anyone that watches darts, you're gonna know this building very well. The Alexandra Palace or the Ali Pally. It is home to the World Darts Championship since 2008. If you've seen my first 56 episodes, you'll know that we've just located yet another old world building. The Alexandra Palace was built by John Johnson, another reoccurring AI generated name, and Alfred Meissen, where it opened in 1873. But following a fire, sixteen days after it opened. Sixteen days after it opened? Really? This is incredible, the amount of fire narratives, because we all know at this point and have covered the Crystal Palace that they just threw into this story connecting the two buildings, saying that North London's counterpart to the Crystal Palace. And we know here that the Crystal Palace also burned down in a fire. The connections that are made within these narratives are incredible. So let's just follow this path of fires for a minute and see where they lead us, and we'll come back to the Alexandra Palace right after. The Crystal Palace had a reoccurring name because the AI says the daughter's name is also Crystal, and they were walking their dog. The dog was probably also named Crystal. And they just realized randomly that the massive crystal structure was burning down where 89 fire engines and 400 firemen couldn't save the building. How long was the building burning down before they realized it? Nobody saw any smoke? Crystal and her dog were the only ones to realize it. So she walks her dog, finds the burning down Crystal Palace, Palace, and the true cause of the fire will forever be a mystery, where we are also told another clear lie, where 100,000 people came to watch the blaze. They told us that within a few hours, the fire was done, and the palace was destroyed. So in a matter of a few hours, 100,000 people just hopped up out of bed in 1936, and they ran right over there in the middle of the night to go watch this fire. And this is clearly an AI generated story when it just throws another fire in the exact same paragraph for fun. In 1866, when the North Transept burned down and didn't have proper insurance coverage from GEICO to rebuild the building. No. This was from the old world, and our civilization today cannot rebuild it, especially in 1866. We still do have a ton of structures from the old world, like the York Cathedral, also located in the North Transcept, where they tell us that construction began over one thousand three hundred and ninety seven years ago. Well, actually, tell us they found it. But the booming six twenty sevens. Can you believe that this is what we're being told? The year 06/27. Are you kidding me? And we're supposed to believe this. A time before paper. There were no phones. There were no power tools for another one thousand two hundred and sixty eight years. Zero training needed. Nothing. We are supposed to believe that they had nothing, but they had it covered, and they were master builders at the exact same time. We are told that there's no electricity, zero modern plumbing. All of these things were unnecessary in the six twenty sevens. But being able to construct massive cathedrals, that was just embedded in their DNA. Over one thousand four hundred years later, Today, we have classes that go into great detail, supposedly, learning architecture skills from the very best teachers of our time period. Yet, I don't see anybody constructing this type of structure for everybody to see. But yet, they did this so many times all over the world. And guess what? All of their work is still here for us to see. Could you imagine the buildings, the structures that were here before we were born that have been destroyed by now? Just look at the size of the doorways. Everything was just massive and over the top to our civilization, but completely normal to the old world. And, of course, in the year 741, they know all about this building. But one thousand years later, as we've shown, that they have no idea who constructed anything. They don't tell us any details about the construction process, how many men, where the materials come from, none of that. But here we go. 741. Not 742. 741 on the dot. The church was destroyed by a fire. So we get the nod. And how did we not see the fires before? This is insane, the amount of fires. How can every single one of these old world buildings hold a fire narrative? And nobody noticed it until now. These fires are insane in a very clear pattern that this narrative was just sitting here waiting for us to find it. Librarian got to work. He started the reconstruction, and, thankfully, Ian Bald was there to take over and wrap this palace up no problem. I couldn't be more thankful that we know the truth, that these stories are just that. They're stories. It is so much more fun knowing the truth, understanding that no librarian just sits around waiting for a fire to then knock out palaces one thousand four hundred years ago, understanding that no damage took place in 1069. And what we see today is the original building, and there were no Thomases of the one thousand seventies getting the repairs done in less than five years for it then to be destroyed yet again. Five years after that, getting rebuilt again with perfection, of course, very easily that they could just switch up the entire style of the cathedral in five years, switching it now to the Norman style. Switching it up no problem at all one thousand years ago just because the Norman style was just the style of the times five years later, the good old Norman style. Anyone switching their homes to the Norman style this year? Anyone know any librarians in the Norman style construction business? So after this gets done one thousand years ago, during the day, at nighttime, they hop on their donkey and go to sleep in their sheds for another big day of construction. Freezing in the winters, of course, and you're not on the fence still, are you? I'll keep going. Where the new Norman style cathedral was damaged by fire in 1137. But don't worry. The one thousand one hundreds had it covered because it was soon repaired. All remodeled in 1154. And this is all fully documented, of course. No. And there were many witnesses. No. Lots of evidence of all of these fires and reconstruction projects. There's none. But just trust them. They know what really happened, and you don't. Yeah. It's not working anymore. A new one was built all in the Norman style with ease nine hundred years ago. When in 1390, the Norman style goes out of style and needs to be demolished because they could be very picky in the thirteen hundreds. This was not up to their standards. Time for a new style. Fifteen years later, in fourteen o five, fully documented, of course. No. This thing was all done and wrapped up with a brand new high altar. Two years later, the central tower collapses. But don't worry. Thirteen years later, 1420, the tower is back in business. Oh my. You gotta be joking. In 1829, an arson attack, and in 1840, an accidental fire. And in 1984, York minister suffered a serious fire in its south transept during the early morning hours where they made the decision to deliberately collapse the roof of the South Transept by pouring tens of thousands of gallons of water onto it. We get this very in-depth story in 1984 because we were all here to see it, and it actually happened. Remember, a fire is a great way to destroy the old world. There's nobody to blame, and they get to collect the insurance check at the exact same time. But the fires before the nineteen hundreds, in my opinion, they are nods. They never happened. They are simply throwing it into the narrative to show the hidden group which buildings are from the previous civilization. So for the fire that we actually saw in 1984, they have this incredible narrative and documented accounts with people putting the fire out and all of it. But for all of the other fires, there was nothing. It just burned down, and boom. It's back to normal. No problem over and over. Switching styles if they wanted to, which isn't logical at all. And, of course, they have no idea what caused the massive fire. With these ridiculous stats, 80% chance it was caused by lightning. There's a 10% chance it was caused by yet another mysterious arson, but they got away without anyone knowing. And another 10% chance it was caused by an electrical fault with a 100% chance that they know the truth and are lying. And can we just say one thing before we move on? How many times did we see the name Thomas and William in this story? I mean, I get it. It's a popular name in the one thousands. It was a trendy name back then, but come on. After what we've seen, not only do we get the AI fires, but we also get the reoccurring names. We get Thomas of Bayo, Thomas Fairfax, Thomas Beckett, then we get William the Conqueror of the one thousand sixty sixes. The drawing of the building by William Martin, you know, the brother of the arsonist, which at this point is just rubbing it in our faces. And to top it off, I think this paragraph should be changed from shrines to Williams because are we talking about shrines or are we talking about Williams? With William Fitzherbert, Saint William of York, which is perhaps associated with Saint William's College, we get William DeWickwain and William Markham. If you ask me, that's not normal or mathematically possible. For a single paragraph about a true narrative, it is, on the other hand, 100% possible that an AI generated these narratives. Now we got away from the original building of the Alexandra Palace. I think for good reason, but let's get back to it now. We know that it also holds the fire narrative where the story begins with a company name that is definitely AI generated. The Great Northern Palace Company. How many great northern palaces was this great northern palace company knocking out in the mid eighteen hundreds? They apparently only built this palace and then decided that that was the end of the company with zero other buildings listed to their name. We have to just stop for a second and really look at what they're telling us. This guy named Owen Jones, who they used for the Crystal Palace as well, of course, started this project for the Alexandra Palace in 1859, supposedly. A year after that, this great North Palace company just comes out of nowhere, and we are told that the palace construction company couldn't get the funds to build their first and only Construction materials were acquired and recycled from the large 1862 International Exhibition Building. So they took all the pieces from this massive building that they just didn't want anymore. In my opinion, the buildings both have the exact same material. So they are trying to attempt to explain why this is the case by saying that they just went over to the other one, took the other one apart, and used it for this one. When in reality, they were built by the same old world civilization. So let's pretend it's 2024, and we make a new construction company called Your Everyday Palace Construction Company, and they have zero money and just start ripping apart the SoFi Stadium. And they build a little miniature version of it. And we all agree that this is a great idea and totally normal and acceptable. Are we all on the same page that that is ridiculous? Okay. Good. Let's continue. In 1863, three years later, they begin to try and explain away why this palace sits on top of a hill, which is very interesting because we all know about the hills and how they most likely are just grass covering bigger structures under what we can see, especially when this is installed into the narrative that the palace sits on a site that stands on a ridge more than 300 feet high. So in 1865, they finally get this project started. They get the job done in 1873, and sixteen days later, the whole thing burns down. And 4,700 items, in my opinion, these are old world items, especially when they tell us that they are items of historic value. These items, in my opinion, were never even in this building. They probably still have these items, but we're told they were all destroyed in this fire that happened sixteen days after the palace is done. Here is where we find a massive logistical slip up by the narrator. We were told that the entire building was supposedly destroyed on the inside, saying that only the outer walls survived. And we were told that the palace took eight years to build. Well, in 1873, the fire took place. They had to clean the entire place up, plan out a new one, and get the job done somehow in the eighteen hundreds before the power tool was invented invented and get this reconstruction project done in less than two years. A massive slip up. This right here, in my opinion, proves that this entire story is all a lie. This is logistically impossible today in 2024. We would not be able to come close to getting this project done in that time frame. Yet in 1873 to 1875, we are told, and we are supposed to believe, that they had no problem at all doing it. Just giving us a quick sentence that the palace was quickly rebuilt and reopened in 1875. How many men did they need? Who constructed that one? Who cleaned the other one up? And this wasn't like a few basic drywall sheets that they just had to throw together and call it a day. No. They say the brand new Alexandra Palace, the one that took less than two years in the eighteen eighteen hundreds before the power tool contained a concert hall, art galleries, a museum, electro hall, a library, a banqueting room, and a large theater. Why are they leaving out massive details for this project? This is incredible. This place even had a horse racing course that they destroyed in 1970, a Japanese village, and other things. And do you also find it odd that these sports teams just started popping up in the late eighteen hundreds. There are none from the seventeen hundreds. Do you find that odd? This goes back to episode ten and thirty eight, that the timeline, in my opinion, begins in 1776. And I wanna make this clear. I don't think that The USA is the reason for the kick start. This isn't a USA versus the world topic. Every country, in my opinion, was also created to create borders and division. Passports, as we have talked about, have also just arrived in the eighteen hundreds so that you are physically jailed within the walls that they have provided, unless you have papers to visit other lands, which should be a given right that we should just build a visit wherever we want since this is where we were born. I think that the world is operating together. The world is conducting this operation that planned out The USA in 1776, and that was the initial starting point to the new timeline that we are all presented. My point is that we are told that for millions of years, humans invented nothing, but we're very capable of building the Milan Cathedral and all the incredible structures from thousands of years ago. And these civilizations that constructed these things, we are told, had nothing. They didn't have electricity. No cars, no planes, no trains, no phones to communicate. Yet, we see star forts all over the world. They look exactly the same. With zero communication, we are told that only five hundred years ago, Columbus found America, yet there are star forts all over The USA that look exactly like the ones in Europe. We have nothing for millions of years, but so many so called inventions have just come out of nowhere in the last two hundred years. The probability of us having nothing, riding by feathers, riding on donkeys, no power tools, and living in sheds. That is simply, in my mind, mathematically impossible. Oh, did you think we were done with the Alexander Palace? A fire happened as we've shown inside the Alexander Palace sixteen days after the opening in 1873. They rebuilt the building as we were told in just two years, completed in 1875. Now as a reminder, these old fires, most likely in my opinion, never happened, and they are simply a nod to the hidden group that this specific building is from the old world built by a previous civilization. Now there's a big difference between a fire from the eighteen hundreds or as we have shown from the thirteen hundreds, which is ridiculous. But there's a big difference from a fire in the eighteen hundreds that we cannot find any evidence that it ever took place and a fire within the last one hundred years that we were all around to see and document. And this is when things get interesting. When in 1980, a Haringey council took over the trusteeship of the Alexandra Palace, insuring it for 31,000,000. As we have explained, a fire from the last one hundred years is not only a nod. It's also a great way to destroy one of these buildings from the previous civilization without anyone to blame. Not only do they get to destroy the building, but they also collect the insurance check. It is a win win for them, and this Haringey Council is worth an investigation. Because just six months after they insured it, for 31,000,000, a fire started under the organ that completely spread. It destroyed half of the building. Again, the outer walls survived because these outer walls are from the old world and not by us. House fires also don't destroy stone, brick, or marble. It simply doesn't get hot enough, and we've shown this as well. The famous organ was destroyed even though they were already dismantling it. What are the odds of that? And took our civilization while we were all here to see it. Eight years to reopen. When in 1873, it took them two years. Are you seeing the lie very clearly now? Multiple fires, tons of destruction, and an incredible amount of lies all just sitting here waiting for us to pick it apart and expose it to the world every single week. 17 East Monroe Street, Chicago, Illinois. We have the Palmer House Hotel where we are told that there have been multiple day. The at of day. Great giving it away as a wedding present at in the eighteen end hundreds was very normal. This was a common gesture back then, and you're gonna wanna stay around to the end when we tie this entire thing together and find something awesome that connects with this city and everything that we found. So this hotel present opens up in 1870 with no issues, of course. All of the horses pulled the stone to the site perfectly, and they all did their part. And the very next year, it, of course, burns down in the great Chicago bomb. Oh oh, did I say bomb? Well, they tell us that it was a fire, but I don't believe that these great fires were actually fires. This looks to me like these so called great fires in every single city in the world, basically. You can go ahead and look it up. It happened in a city near you. These were actually bombs in my opinion. The destruction was something that a fire alone could never accomplish, especially when we are given the fire story from the National Geographic Society that the Chicago fire bomb started by accidentally knocking over a lantern when running away from a card game, and this causes the entire city to burn down? Stone buildings that look like palaces. I think we all know that this is ridiculous at this point. Could you imagine if someone in your neighborhood's house started on fire, and that fire burns down your entire neighborhood. No. And not to mention that all of the houses would have been built with brick and stone, materials that don't burn down to the ground from house fires. Let's take a look at the destruction again where they tell us that this is the ruins of the first Palmer House. And for one, are we 100% sure that this photo is showing us the destruction of the first Palmer House? And for two, is this even Chicago? Could this be a random street in Germany right after they bombed it? And for three, take a look at those buildings in the background. This is from a tipped over lantern, or is it more possible that we are being lied to? The buildings are just ripped apart. They're shredded and smashed. And we know you can't burn down stone and brick buildings from a simple house fire. They don't get anywhere near hot enough. This is exactly why you put stone around the fire pit. You make stone and brick fireplaces inside your house, right inside your living room, and nobody panics. It doesn't spread into your kitchen or into your neighbor's house. It doesn't crumble and look like it exploded. Are you seeing the lie very clearly now? Now let's go deeper. Now they tell us that this photo is the second Palmer house that was constructed on the same site as the first one. And before we go on, they tell us that this was completed just four years after the Chicago fire bomb by Donkeys Incorporated with the help from their horse and wagon community. They just cleaned up that old one that was exploded all over the place. They moved all the broken stone and cleared off a solid, nice, and level spot for a brand new foundation. In just four years, no problem. They built this after the fire. Take a look at these horses and wagons right next to the completed Palace. Built in less than four years? And, honestly, it looks like it's been there for a long time. We have these wood planks set up that they would use to go from the paved sidewalk from the old world to these dirt roads. If this horse and wagon community built these sidewalks, they would have just built a ramp leading to the dirt with the same sidewalk material, but they didn't. They went and got a wood plank because that was what they were capable of in that time period. They were capable of a wood plank as their ramp. To walk from the sidewalk to the dirt road, they found these buildings, and they were occupying the old world civilization's work. And we're still doing this today all over the world. In 1870, the first Palmer House was completed. In 1871, a year later, a tipped over lantern and tons of bombs go off and destroy the whole city. To clean up two buildings. So in 1871, how long do you think it would take those horse and wagons? Realistically, without massive equipment, how long would it take them to clean this up? Not eight months. I can guarantee you that. It would have taken them years. So now knowing this information, here we go. We are told that they cleaned up this entire site. They planned out a new one with perfection. They made sure they had the right construction team picked out. They planned out the materials. They had enough horses and wagons to pull the stone and marble. Everything else they needed to do, permits and everything, and get this second building done completed in 1875 from the point of the fire to the completion date, only taking four years. With Chicago winters being brutal, we know that this is logistically impossible, and they give us this nice photo photo of it when today, we don't build any seven story palaces in less than four years. And that's not including the entire cleanup project from the fire bombs going off in 1871 all over Downtown Chicago. Oh, did I forget to mention that this AI generated story just couldn't help itself but throw another fire into this paragraph, saying that this was the world's only fireproof hotel and built with perfection and with rapid speeds in the eighteen hundreds. And get this, 1920 hits. So this building is supposedly only 45 years old at this point. We have supposedly the world's first and only fireproof building. And please just look at this thing again. We can see for ourselves. Does this look like a building that's going to go out of date in forty five years? No. Of course, it doesn't. Well, they demolished it and make the third Palmer House on the exact same site. Unbelievable. This time, it only took them two years to get done. They tell us that this is the first one and that this is the second one. And now with everything that we know, we know that the narrative is ridiculous and a total lie at this point. So let's ask a massive question here. Do you think it's possible that these photos of these two buildings were just photos of other buildings around Chicago or even in different cities that they just knocked down and threw them into this story? It seems like it to me. They had a lot of buildings to get rid of to start this reset, and this seems like the most logical explanation in my opinion. Use one building to explain away all of these other old world buildings that are no longer here. And this third Palmer House hotel is just built on top of an old world structure. You can see the difference between the old world construction on the bottom and our bland brick style where it almost looks like they threw a layer of brick over the top of the old world's work. There were a lot of buildings in Chelaga that needed to be destroyed. So this Palmer House Hotel all happened because of this Potter Palmer guy, supposedly. And this guy is pinned as the guy that developed Lakeshore Drive and worked with another character that got a lot of old world buildings pinned to his name. As we have shown Marshall Field, where this guy got the Field Museum, where they also got to share the department store chain, the Marshall Field Company, along with this other guy, Levi Leiter, which we can look into in another episode. I'm sure he's got the exact same kind of stuff going on. My point for coming back to this potter Palmer was because he got to live in this castle mansion, and it's an obvious old world castle that was once located on North Lakeshore Drive, Chicago. Did you know Chicago had castles? And this one was supposedly constructed in just three years from 1882 to 1885 by the Cobb and Frost firm, which we have gone over. We know that they are characters as well. The castle in Chicago destroyed in 1950. The thing was only 65 years old. I'm gonna ask you guys. Do castles go out of date in sixty five years? The last time I checked, they don't. I mean, even the houses that we build today with their vinyl siding that fall off once a year when the wind blows. These houses don't even go out of date in just sixty five years. Yet a massive castle thrown together in three years in the eighteen hundreds that looks like it's straight out of a Disney movie. That one goes out of style in just sixty five years. They must have looked at it with disgust in that time period. Their standards were just so high while riding around on their donkeys donkeys located in Chicago, Illinois. While they're also over there just a couple blocks down gifting old world hotels, all pinned to this Potter Palmer guy. It's amazing. What a time to be alive in the eighteen hundreds. You get free hotels and castles everywhere. You know what? I was thinking about it. Let's just go see what this Levi lighter guy was all about. He also got to live in an old world mansion. They tell us that this one was constructed in 1891. That's the only construction details that they give us on this mansion, where we have seen in previous episodes that they know all about the year negative 300 over two thousand three hundred years ago. They give us these ridiculous stories about construction. But in 1891, there's nothing. The 55 room marble stairway with a great hall mansion was, of course, taken over by the US government and then demolished just fifty six years after it was built because there was nothing to see there. No. And this whole project, we are told, started in 1891 where the old world building that had white marble ceilings and elaborate fireplace, carved woodwork, because this was very normal stuff in the eighteen hundreds. Anybody could have done that. They don't even care to mention who that would have been. They knocked out that hand carved woodwork that they only needed for fifty six years. They start the project in 1891 where he buys the land on June 12. We are being told that they still haven't started the construction because they finally get the permit. We already know this thing is done in 1893, so they better get going on it. We only got eighteen months to work with now. So they get this Theo guy picked out where they give us a list of other buildings to investigate because this Saint Thomas Church is also destroyed. So we get stained glass windows, a marble stairway, hand carved woodwork, marble ceilings with zero information as to where all of this material even came from. We are told, and we are supposed to believe, that this 55 room masterpiece is done in less than eighteen months. When they tell us it was done at some point in 1893, where they decide that it's just not cutting it anymore, and they all agree to knock it down just fifty six years later in a realistic world where everybody is thinking logically. This is a story for a baby. We don't build places today in eighteen months and then knock them down in just fifty six years, and they didn't do that in the eighteen hundreds either. This building was here much longer than we are being told, and this very wealthy individual was clearly a part of a group that allowed him to occupy this old world mansion. And then this is where they give us a clue for us to dig deeper. The clue is Theo Chandler, where they tell us that he designed this castle that got destroyed after just fifty six years of use. Well, he also had a few other things attached to his name that should open a few eyes. First of all, he is off supposedly designing a brand new castle in New Castle County, and they name it the courthouse. A new castle located in a county called New Castle in The USA, where it only got to stand for forty years. At this point, alarms should be going off. A very clear pattern with these specific characters where they are pinned to these old world buildings that hold narratives of incredible construction projects that are being destroyed after such short amount of time. If we are advancing and times are easier now, we are better at construction now versus the eighteen hundreds. Why would they be knocking these type of structures down after just forty years When we are clearly more advanced than the eighteen hundreds in nearly every single aspect, including training processes, we have established construction teams. We have incredible equipment, tools, and resources, and we would never do this. We would never knock this building down after just forty years. Our towns build the ugliest buildings with basic materials and basic boring 90 degree angles. They look like boxes. Yet when the eighteen hundreds supposedly build a courthouse, it's a masterpiece that they can afford to and all agree to knock down. It's completely backwards, and it isn't logical. Something much deeper is going on, and we know here that these are destruction projects to remove buildings that were previously here built by a much more advanced civilization and not built by Theo while he's over there directing the project from inside his wagon carriage behind his horse on the dirt road. So let's take a look at what's really being said here. The building stood for just forty years, which we know here that that is not true. It was here much longer than that, and I need to make that clear. But they say that this was the best known building in the city, adding to the point that nobody would ever knock this thing down. The best known building in the city after just forty years, that's the time to blow it up? And this part of the paragraph is very interesting in my opinion where they say, even if very few people now know what used to stand there, and this goes for the whole world, we really don't know what was knocked down before we were born. How long have they been knocking down buildings? Two hundred years? Three hundred years? We know and we have documented many times that they are still destroying these buildings today. But in the eighteen hundreds, there was no way to communicate this to thousands and millions of people to let everybody know that this is happening in their town and so that everyone could share that it was also happening in their town at the exact same time. They didn't have Internet. I believe this was all taken away before 1776 and slowly given back to us. From that point on, the only news that anyone had that was being shared with the population was all controlled. And it seems like our ancestors from the eighteen hundreds were all just under their spell, and nobody could see what was going on around them and what the controllers were doing. And it also seems like up until just a few years ago, this was still going on, just destroying a lot of the old world's work with nobody really realizing it. So here we have a destruction photo from 1919 where we are told and are being made to believe that only 39 after its construction, the basically brand new incredible stone structure was out of date and needed to be torn down. We know that this thing was much older. And as we've said, nobody is knocking this thing down after just thirty nine years. We are also told that the writer of this article thinks that many people who watched it get knocked down also watched it get built, which is simply not the case. This And is a demolition, a planned demolition. It was torn down. There was no fire. Take a look at the structure, and now let's look at the Palmer House from earlier. They look exactly the same. They both look like they've been destroyed on purpose, proving my point that no fire took down these buildings. Either it was a planned bomb in all of these cities with the great fire bombs, or they were just going door to door using high velocity explosives. And this brings up something that I've been thinking a lot about. We have all of these stories about these buildings that were knocked down, but it does make you think about how many buildings were destroyed before 1800 that we don't have any narratives or photos of, and they were just wiped out. Buildings that weren't classified as courthouses, but just regular stores to create a new timeline and new narratives. Just based on these incredible mansions, hotels, castles, and courthouses in The USA that were demolished, it makes you really think and wonder if Budapest, the way that every single building basically looks like it's straight out of the old world, it makes you think, did nearly every single city in the world at one point before their great fire date look exactly like Budapest and the buildings that made it through the main destruction on that great fire date? These were the structures that needed to be explained away in a false narrative and fit into our timeline for a thirty nine year gap and tossed out before anyone really noticed it. We have the Symphony Center, a music complex located at 220 South Michigan Avenue, a building that is here for everyone to see in Chicago, Illinois, a building that holds a 2,522 seat orchestra hall, a rehearsal hall and performance space, a ballroom, an event space that overlooks Michigan Avenue, and the Art Institute of Chicago that holds a multistory rotunda. And for the best part of the story and the clear giveaway, this building, we are told, had its construction begin in May of nineteen o four and held its first concert that same exact year in December of nineteen o four, over a hundred and twenty years ago. All of this getting done in seven months. That would be incredible if it was true. And we don't get the fire narrative here, but we do get an architect with the name Daniel Burnham. Burn. Really. It's just unbelievable. The amount of times that the narrative just throws something about burning or fires or destruction into these narratives. Burnham. Now with a name like that attached to this kind of building built in seven months, a hundred and twenty years ago, I think that qualifies for an investigation of mister Burnham, where he is pinned as a repeated failure. And I know I've seen this movie before when they tell us that Abe Lincoln failed at everything and then became a hero. It has been used many, many times by the narrator. They pinned this burn guy as the creator of the tallest building in Chicago in 1881, the Montauk Building, where in 1881, forget about sleep, forget about freezing winters, get your horses to the site, and get this building done. Built in a year from 1882 to 1883. This thing is done. The tallest building in Chicago. And you know what they gotta do? They gotta knock it down in nineteen o two. That is literally nineteen years later. Is anybody on the fence at this point? Well, if you are, this is gonna help you get off the fence and over to our side. Let's have some fun. The guy with fire in his name, Burnham, went on to build more of the first American skyscrapers such as the Masonic Temple building in Chicago, measuring 21 stories, 302 feet. This character knocked this thing out from 1891 to 1892. This was simple stuff back then. And knocking it down in 1939. But they could knock that one down because they had a new location and opened that one up in 1926 supposedly. And this new one holds the deadliest theater fire and the deadliest single building fire in US history. After this fire killed 600 people, so we get the fire and the destruction of lives where they say that this doubled the death toll of the Chicago great fire, which is weird because according to the National Geographic Society, the Chicago great fire destroyed 17,500 buildings. Only a 120 bodies were recovered, and three hundred people died. Where we can all do the math and see that this does not add up for one building to hold more deaths than 17,500 buildings, and that there is a massive, massive lie just waiting for all of us to uncover it. What would happen if today, we prove to the world that the great fire narratives all over the world are a massive, massive cover up, proving that they were actually huge projects, removing buildings that were built prior to 1776, and that the population of these massive cities were basically zero. What if I told you that today, after this episode, you will never think about the great fires the same way ever again? What if I told you that after this episode, you will never trust the history ever again? I've been waiting a long time to share this episode with the world. Are you ready to have your mind blown? Are you ready to see what we found today? Chicago, Illinois. We have the eighteen seventy one great fire, a fire that destroyed everything, over 17,500 buildings, and only left six buildings supposedly, killing basically nobody. Zero point zero zero zero eight percent of people died. Humans cannot inhale smoke. Not only do we have to keep the fire physically burning the individuals in mind, but also just as dangerous and a major cause of death from fires are actually inhaling smoke, taking only two to ten minutes to pass out or even die. Fire burns oxygen. So as a fire continues to be active, more oxygen gets removed from the room. Keep this in mind as we continue. Here we have photos of all of the buildings. The whole city was supposedly destroyed by a fire. If this is true, then more than 300 people of the 334,000 people would have died. Today, in my opinion, will be the end of the main history narrative. Speaker 1: There's a YouTube channel called My Lunch Break. Mhmm. It's called My Lunch Break. YouTube channel, you will get addicted to that shit. Speaker 0: One of two things is more likely than what they're telling us and more probable mathematically, where all of the buildings are destroyed, yet nobody had an issue getting away. So either there were more people that died than just zero point zero zero eight percent of the population when all of the 17,500 buildings were in flames than we're actually being told about, which would make a lot more sense, but this is not the narrative that we're told. And to clear this up and to give this a much clearer perspective, 1871, where people didn't even have cars yet. They had to ride their horses or run around in order to escape this fire. So that is option number one. The other option is that the population simply wasn't 300,000 people like we're being told. And these cities were actually empty, and the previous civilization was erased. And it was time, more specifically, a planned time to demolish most of their work. And they just absolutely shredded these 17,500 buildings with massive bombs and explosives to destroy the old world civilization's construction, buildings that would have given this entire false narrative away decades ago, destroying 17,500 buildings before anyone really even started living in Chelaga again. And this option, in my opinion, seems like the most logical answer. Because why would only 300,000 people already have 17,500 buildings in the first place? I think this point alone proves that we are being led to, that the main stream history is not truthful. Right after this eighteen seventy one fire, they tell us that they just cleaned the whole thing up, and all these other brand new buildings are magically here again. For example, like we discussed, the second Palmer House was completed just four years after the eighteen seventy one great fire. So we can see that the narrative has a ton of issues and flaws. It is becoming story hour. It's not factual information like we deserve at this point, and these questions that we're asking are just opening the floodgates for the truth to come through. We also have the Temple Building to compare the great fire information to. The Temple Building was the tallest building in Chicago, you know, the building that was owned by the which still meets today. And it also holds the narrative where the primary designer of the building and the primary representative, both of them, not one, both died during the construction, which we have seen so many times, that they moved to the new in 1926 where it's time to take this up a notch and really start to put this whole thing into perspective and also go even deeper than we did in our last episode because there is so much more to this story that we didn't cover yet. When the new building supposedly replaced an even earlier venue on the exact same site. So what happened to the first one? It opened in November of nineteen o three when the fire broke out one month later in December of nineteen o three. One month later? During a performance and caused six hundred and two deaths and ranks as the number one worst theater fire in The United States even to this day. For nearly one hundred years, this fire was the deadliest fire in one building in US history, now being number one. And get this, this theater was supposedly fireproof. One month after being opened, it burns down. This is incredible. And we have seen this exact story before from our Saint Louis episodes. When they say that the fire started due to lighting the curtain on fire. So this curtain starts on fire, and the fire exits were locked or hidden, which sounds like a plan even if this wasn't a event. Let's think logically here. In 1871, during the Chicago fire, when 17,500 stone and brick buildings were magically burned to the ground even though we know that stone and brick does burn to the ground from house fires, which is why you have stone and brick fireplaces inside your living room. And everyone all over the world remains extremely calm, and your neighbors don't seem to mind either, it doesn't and never will spread to their house or to the basement. It won't make your house look like a bomb went off. And I guess I should say don't try this at home, but come on. You get the point. Do you think that it's possible that they possibly by chance might not have been able to escape their homes or they were maybe up too high in one of the buildings to escape? Do you think that a group of people may have had some trouble escaping their building? Do you think that it's possible that more than one of the 17,500 buildings somewhere in Chicago that looked like they were exploded might have crumbled on top of someone? Or is it even possible that maybe a single issue might have came up anywhere like this theater did where the door was jammed? They say that the Chicago fire started at 08:30PM. Do you think that maybe some people were sleeping and didn't realize there was a fire until it was too late? Were there possibly some individuals that had a broken leg or were disabled? Was there not a hospital with people in it that possibly couldn't escape the smoke? And if they did, where did everybody go? The fire was supposedly engulfing the roads and spreading to the next building. All 300,000 people would have been burnt to a crisp if the mainstream history tale was true. It would have been one massive bonfire, yet basically everybody survived. My point is how is it mathematically possible that one building kills six hundred people, yet seventeen thousand five hundred buildings killed three hundred people. At which point does everyone understand that we are being lied to and the major industry from only a hundred and fifty years ago is a lie. So how can you believe something that the same people are telling us about from over 1,000 ago? And how can we believe anything that we're being told by this group of people that lie constantly? Nearly every single one of these great fires happened in the eighteen hundreds right after the 1776 date, which was when The USA began. The main great fire that predates this 1776 date falls on 01/06 which is the London great fire, which is where The USA originally came from. And I'm guessing based on all of my research that this date of one is a code and not a real event because I'm about to take this thing to a whole another level from this point until the end of the episode, and we are going to destroy their narrative. Narrative. So I hope you all have your popcorn ready. It's time to make our own history. Here we go. The great fire of London in 01/06 destroyed 13,200 houses, 87 parish churches, the royal exchange, guildhall, and Saint Paul's Cathedral, 13,200 houses. So there must have been thousands of casualties. Right? Six people died in the great fire of London, and this is when we know we have found something huge. When we go to New York, where they had the great fire of New York destroying 700 buildings. And which year was that in again? I forget. Can somebody clear this up for me? Am I right, or am I definitely right that this operation worldwide began in 1776? The great fire of New York happened in 1776, holding only two deaths, covering 700 buildings. Two people died in the entire great fire of New York. Two, seven hundred buildings, and only two people in 1776. So what's the total at? We have one building in Chicago holding 600 deaths. I have shown three great fires so far, Chicago, New York, and London, with a total of 308 deaths that have a total of 31,490 buildings destroyed. This is impossible for 31,490 buildings to be engulfed in flames with basically nobody dying. 308 deaths to be exact. If you trusted the narrative before today, this day will be the final day that it is trusted ever again. Because in 1916, Paris, Texas also had a great fire where it destroyed everything in its path besides people because it destroyed 1,440 old world buildings where only three people died, moving the total old world buildings that were destroyed up to 32,930. 32,930 buildings gone. And could you imagine what these buildings, what these cities looked like with the mainstream narrative admitting that these buildings were all here, and now they're gone. So, again, thirty two thousand nine hundred and thirty buildings are gone with a total of now only 311 Making this extremely clear that we are being lied to about something. Either the death totals were actually way higher than what we're being told or these cities were basically empty. I've had a lot of people comment that they want me to include Canada and incorporate it into my research, and I can't wait to do that right now. Toronto, Canada, you're up. You had a great fire in nineteen o four, destroying over 100 old world buildings. We know these were built by a much more advanced previous civilization, buildings that would make zero sense in our fabricated main historical timeline where we are given a massive fire, destroying everything in its path with a total of zero deaths. Nobody, not a single person, not one person inhaled too much smoke for two to ten minutes. In a great fire that took down over 100 buildings. In 1852, we are given the great fire of Montreal, Canada, where it left 10,000 people homeless when 57,000 people in 1852 had hundreds of buildings, which isn't logical at all or isn't mathematically probable in itself. If you think that Donkeys Incorporated saddled up in the early half of the eighteen hundreds and knocked out massive cities for only 57,000 people, I think it's time to reconsider what you've been told. When within a few hours, one quarter of Montreal was destroyed, and yet again, nobody died. Nobody. Destroying almost half of the city's houses. In 1852, they all evacuated perfectly and ran to safety. Everybody? Not a single person had an issue? Do you understand what it would take for a fire to spread from house to house rapidly? We all understand that this fire would be massive. I know I'm being brutally honest, but a lot of people would have died. This would have been extremely catastrophic. This would not be a case of zero death. In fact, it would have been nowhere near zero deaths, and we all know this. This narrative of zero casualties is simply not the true history of our past, where we are also told that 1,100 houses burned down. Nobody had an issue getting away from these fires, not a single person. Fires that supposedly swept the streets to spread to the next house over and over in 1852. How were they just escaping this situation? You would think that somebody would have died from inhaling too much smoke. Now this tells us 1,100 houses burned down but leaves out the buildings. So let's just estimate that it was around the same as Toronto, adding another 100 buildings to that 1,100, moving the total buildings destroyed from these great fires to 34,230 buildings destroyed and only 311 counties. And remember, there are hundreds of great fire narratives that happened in the city near you. The mainstream history is suggesting that we are supposed to believe at this point that 110 buildings have to go down in flames for us to record one If this was one death per 22 buildings destroyed in these great fires, we would be at a much more realistic death total of one thousand five hundred and fifty five deaths, which is one fifth the amount that we're being told. When realistically, it should be flipped. We should realistically have less death today per building than they would in the eighteen hundreds since we have cars, phones, proper firefighters, and the rest. To say that zero people in the eighteen hundreds die from a great fire that swept through the entire city, leaving the end result looking like massive bombs went off multiple times is mathematically impossible. This is not a realistic narrative at all. And now that we have looked into this, compared it to other situations, shown factual evidence that they are lying in all of this. I wanna give my opinion on what happened. I think that the population worldwide was basically zero in the early eighteen hundreds, and I'm gonna go into great detail on this in an upcoming episode. And this episode is basically a setup to lean into this topic of the population lie. But I think the previous civilization's population around the world before 1776, I would say one hundred years prior to 1776 based on the condition that these buildings were in. It would put it at around a hundred years, realistically. It couldn't have been thousands of years. These buildings would have just been a mess, just from the nature growing all over it and inside. But I believe the worldwide population in what we call the 15 or 16 was massive. I believe that the technology was much more advanced than what we have today, And we are given back a very small percentage of this technology and told that it's brand new. And we all get excited and believe it. We are told that we are advancing when really we're just going around and around, getting the same exact technology as last time or less than the previous civilization. And this is all based on control. The fact that they wrote these fake stories and made it so blatantly obvious that they are fake, saying that zero peep in massive fires, destroying all of their homes, all of their buildings over and over and over. It really makes me think that they were just waiting for somebody to find this information like it's some sort of test or some strange game because it really is just so obvious once you see the lie. Now knowing what we know about the great fires, I'm going to cover a few more things that should just completely hammer it home for everyone here. Here we have the great fire of Detroit in eighteen o five, which was twenty nine years after The USA came around and also twenty nine years after the New York great fire in 1776. Notice, nearly all of these great fires are happening after that date, and they tell us that nearly everything was destroyed. But yet again, nobody died. Where it starts in the stable again, and yet again, not a single Everything is destroyed. Nobody And this reminds me of the repeating narrative where they tell us that everything was built in a year perfectly over and over and over all over the world by a guy and his donkey riding team with no power tools, no machines, no training. The stone shipping company coordinate the delivery right on time. The mud trails and the rain were never an issue. The freezing winters, they just told them to get over it and toughen up. And they get the whole building or cathedral done with no issues, done in seven months. This kind of stuff is so repetitive in just a different way. These narratives hold patterns, and this is one of them. These fire narratives are all connected, and I don't personally think that they were fires. I think they were bomb explosives. They were deliberate attacks on the old world buildings to hide our true past, our true history, which is exactly why we are all so confused as to where we are and what we're doing here. I really hope you all enjoyed learning about these great oh oh, wait. What is this? Detroit only had 600 people during this massive great fire? What did 600 people need hundreds of buildings for in eighteen o five? Well, the math doesn't lie, and it never will. These 600 people did not build these buildings. And I was gonna end this episode right there, but I just wanna make sure this is not a debate at all and an episode that everyone can remember. Nineteen sixteen Phoenix Great Fire, 80 buildings destroyed, one death. Miami, Florida, nineteen o one, 2003 hundred and sixty eight buildings gone to the fire. Only seven deaths from thousands of buildings. Only seven deaths. Houston, great fire of nineteen twelve. The fire claimed zero lives but caused an estimated $7,000,000 in damage to property, equating the $237,000,000 today, and nobody died. I hope you all have a great rest of your day. I'll be back very soon with much more. See you.
Saved - July 8, 2026 at 12:12 AM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Happy 4th of July, the entire history of USA is fake https://t.co/TOkRiepDUj

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video questions whether major “old world” capitol and landmark buildings were built as mainstream timelines claim, arguing that if different architects were involved, the resulting buildings should look different. It then tours multiple U.S. state capitols, asserting that they look identical even when the stated construction circumstances differ. At the Texas State Capitol, the transcript claims the building was made in 1988 and constructed largely by convicts or migrant workers, completed in six years and 10 months, and argues that power tools were not available in 1885 (it says power tools “ain’t come” until 1895), implying the construction timeline contradicts the expected technology. For the Mississippi State Capitol, it describes a contest with 14 architects submitting plans and says the winner was Theodore C. Link, but then claims the revealed design is “exactly the same” as other capitols despite being chosen from a contest. It similarly describes the Arkansas State Capitol as being built by prisoners and presents other capitol competitions as producing identical results. The transcript states the Minnesota State Capitol involved 41 design submissions, yet the revealed design is “exactly the same.” It says the Montana State Capitol had two competitions: an initial 1896 competition won by an unnamed “this guy,” followed by a second competition after “too much money,” which it claims was won by Charles Bell; it then says the Montana and Arkansas designs are “literally identical.” For the Utah scriptwriter segment, it recounts a process involving 24 architecture firms, narrowed to eight, then a final vote decided “4 to 3.” It claims the resulting Utah Capitol design “looks exactly the friggin’ same as all the other ones.” A major portion shifts to the U.S. National Archives (NARA). The transcript claims NARA should hold original construction documents for federal buildings and reports that NARA’s master list includes only 10 pages for the U.S. Capitol building, filed in 1935, about 135 years after the purported construction. It says the result of follow-up emails was confirmation that if something is missing from the master list, it is not in NARA holdings, and states that NARA does not have documents showing original construction for the U.S. Capitol building. It adds that the U.S. Capitol is described as central to Congress, lawmaking, and presidential inaugurations, and claims the lack of blueprints, construction records, ledgers, and other materials means no documented evidence exists for the stated 1793–1800 construction narrative. It further states that every federal building built before 1934 was required to transfer records to NARA when NARA was created, and therefore if records are absent, they were never created or never kept. The transcript then expands to a “worldwide audit, one building at a time.” In Louisville, Kentucky, it focuses on the Crescent Hill Branch Library, stating that after requests, the library replied that it does not have original construction drawings or load-bearing calculations. It says a form request was denied because the requester was not a Kentucky resident, and that the library claimed it cannot provide the documents via its process. The transcript describes an exchange in which the requester was told the library does not possess the original blueprints or load-bearing calculations, concluding that the building’s “single year” construction claim in 1908 is unverified due to lack of records. It also targets Westminster Presbyterian Church in Minneapolis, Minnesota, describing multiple earlier churches on the site and fires/dates (a second church heavily damaged by fire in 1895, then breaking ground in 1896, opening in 1897). The transcript says emails to the Presbytery of the Twin Cities Area (PTCA), which oversees church administration and records, resulted in a reply that the office does not hold the requested church records or documents. The transcript ends by asserting patterns of missing construction documentation across many named structures (including capitols and other landmarks) and says it will continue seeking evidence for additional buildings, including a “castle tower” in Riverside, Illinois, requesting documentation on how it was built.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can I prove we are a new civilization living among old world buildings in a single video? There's no way that all capitol buildings look exactly the same if they all have a different architect, right? All right, here we are at the Texas State Capitol. The Capitol was made in 1988. It was constructed largely by a bunch of convicts or migrant workers. There's a bunch of convicts building this. This only took six years and 10 months to build. This only took six years and 10 months to build. Did they have power tools in 1885? No, they did not. That ain't come until 1895. So 10 years before the power tool, they were able to construct this with convicts. Yeah, give me a break. All right, so here we are with the Mississippi State Capitol, and the history of it says that there were 14 architects that submitted plans in response to the architectural context and advertised through newspapers. Okay, so there was a contest to see who would make sure that this thing was gonna get built, and a bunch of architects, 14 of them, submitted plans, and of course, they picked the winner, and they chose Theodore C. Link of St. Louis, Missouri. He won the contest. Obviously, this is going to look different than all the other ones because it's a contest. Right? So let's take a look at it. Of course it will. Let's reveal what it looks like. Oh, nope. It's exactly the same. I don't know how that works, but we run a contest with 14 people, and this guy just draws up this exact same structure that we're looking at all over the United States. Speaker 1: Okay, here we are with the Arkansas State Capitol. And... Let's see who built this. Oh, it was a bunch of prisoners. Prisoners know how to build Tartarian buildings, I guess. Speaker 5: Yeah. Speaker 0: Why is this lady walking home? Why didn't she just take her car home? She's got this amazing building. Surely they have cars. Oh, okay. I guess they don't. Speaker 2: Okay, so here we are at the Florida State Capitol, and let's scroll in, and, oh, there it is. Yep, they tore down the original. Speaker 1: Okay, so here we are at the Minnesota State Capitol. They had a competition. There was 41 people that submitted their design. And I don't know why they have 41 people submitting a design when they're all exactly the same. So let's see if it's any different. And... No, it's exactly the same as all the other ones. Speaker 2: The Montana State Capitol. And in this one, they had two competitions. Speaker 3: Okay, right off the bat. a design competition for a building that was conducted in 1896. So they wanted to do a competition. The winner was this guy. He won. A year later they said that, uh, too much money. So they're going to do another competition, of course. So they have two competitions to find out who's going to do this. The second one was won by Charles Bell. I wonder if they built anything different than all the other state capitals I wonder why it would matter whether this guy won or this guy. Does it matter? Because they all look exactly the same. Here's a picture of the winning competition design. Okay. And there's the picture of it. So it looks exactly like all of the other ones. Speaker 2: So this guy's design, George Mann, didn't win, but Arkansas is allowing him to use his design down here. So Arkansas and Montana better not look exactly the same. Let's see. Here's Montana. Let's see Arkansas. Oh, it is literally identical. Here's the competition. Another competition to see who was going to design this thing. It was rejected and another contest was started. Speaker 3: Why do you need competitions if they all look the same? Speaker 2: Let's see how it looks. I'm sure it'll look a little bit different. Oh, same thing. Speaker 3: And the Utah scriptwriter got a little carried away, in my opinion. This is the best of them all. Supposedly they had 24 architecture firms compete to see who was going to be the best design and the winner. Some firms didn't want to compete because the pay wasn't high enough. So then it was down to the final eight firms. Utah gave them five months to get these designs turned in. After a bunch of nonsense, which you can read here for yourself, they finally got it down to the final two. Or you could say the championship. The committee finally took a vote and picked someone by a nail biter. Four to three in the votes. And... Amazing. Just amazing. Nail biter. I think, uh... It sounds like the storyteller might have been drinking that night and been laughing having us read this. Okay, so after all of this, the Capitol building better friggin' look like something better than all the other ones. All right, let's take a look at it. Oh, there it is. Looks exactly the friggin' same as all the other ones. Now, in my opinion, these buildings are all too important to the controllers to knock down. So they have to simply... keep them. They have to add them to the narrative and pretend like they were just built. And I hope you guys enjoyed it. Subscribe, like, and comment below. I will be posting a lot more. I appreciate all the love and I hope you guys have a great day. See ya. Speaker 4: The National Archives of the United States of America, or NARA. This is the place that should hold the original construction documents for every single federal building. They shared the master list with us, and we showed that the US Capitol building, one of the most important structures in American history, they only hold 10 pages. And they were filed in 1935, 135 years after it was supposedly constructed. So I went further and I emailed NARA. I wanted them to confirm that what we see in the master list is actually true. Because if they don't have any records, no blueprints from the United States Capitol building, a palace from 1800 within the National Archives database, then I believe this has to be The most shocking evidence to this point, understanding that the country's foundation is undocumented. This is the single most important political structure within the United States of America. It's the heart of the American government. This is the place where Congress meets, where laws are created, where presidents are inaugurated. So when I send the email to the National Archives, asking them about their master list, telling them, that I came across the United States Capitol building, Washington, DC. Understanding that we've all been lied to, that its original construction was from 1793 to 1800. I pointed out that their blueprints, their construction records, the ledgers, all of the documents that they would have needed to build this thing, they are all missing. And that there are only 10 pages logged from 1935. I wanted them to clarify that this was everything that they had and there wasn't anything missing in the back or that they didn't get around to yet, like the New York Public Library, like we just saw. And this is when they replied back to me and my team, stating, yes, if it is missing from the master list, then we do not have it in our holdings. And this is the end of the mainstream narrative. There's no coming back. It is done. And it's shocking. We have confirmation. that they don't have any evidence at all, that their narrative about the construction of the United States Capitol building from 1793 to 1800 is actually true at all. There's nothing cataloged. There's nothing documented. Zero evidence. And at this point, I don't have any respect for an adult that sits in a classroom and grades children on a story that is completely fabricated. And the reason is because the adult did zero research on their own. to ever even verify whether this story that they grade all these kids on was even true to begin with. They just blindly accepted all of this information and never actually asked for verification. And then they grade these children on it. And I believe that this thought process is all done. It's time for everybody to understand that we need to ask for receipts for all of these stupid stories. And it doesn't stop there. This is for everything. This is not just for history. This is a thought process and it's universal in life. We all need to ask for verification on everything that we're told. I'm not gonna stop. I'm coming after their story hour. I'm going to ruin their favorite chapters. This is the eighth time now that we have exposed a structure where they admit to the world that they do not have the original blueprints. Speaker 0: They don't have the blueprints and they also don't have the ledgers. Speaker 4: They don't have the load-bearing calculations. They have nothing. We have pulled FOIAs. We've talked to government employees and they've admitted it all right here on this channel. And now all of us know that the United States Capitol building, according to the National Archives, does not have a single document proving that they actually constructed this building. NARA isn't just an archive. It's not just a library. NARA exists. specifically to preserve the original documents that would prove the federal government's history, their actions, their construction laws and operations. This includes the following federal building contracts, federal construction blueprints, engineering reports, architectural plans, presidential records, congressional records, maps, surveys, ledgers, correspondence, and all federal documents created by agencies and departments where the US Capitol building it obviously falls into all of this. And we've been asking for the blueprints, and that's when we found NARA. And NARA doesn't have a single document. So, let's go further. Every single federal building built before 1934 was 100% required to transfer all their records to the National Archives when NARA was created. If the records ever existed, NARA would have inherited them. And the fact that they don't have these records means that they were never created. They were never kept. Or, just like we've said for so many years, the entire time, and this is what I believe to be true, this building was found and predates the official narrative. And their narrative is a complete lie. The stage is set, and I'm going to show you how it's not just eight buildings. It's not just the United States Capitol building. We're gonna go to Louisville, Kentucky, and take this whole thing even further. Welcome to episode 160 of my lunch break. I hope you're all having a great day. And if you're new, welcome. I've shown how massive structures, such as the Field Museum in Chicago, the Philadelphia City Hall, and the US Capitol building, all of them hold zero documented construction records. I can also show you that this goes so much further than that. And there was a civilization here before all of us that was advanced. This civilization that was here was not riding around on horses and donkeys. They weren't suffering in winters and they had technology and they lived right here where we are today, where we find their buildings all over the place. And we use all of them right now. This one being the Crescent Hill Branch Library located in Louisville, Kentucky. I just want one blueprint with the load-bearing calculations. I want a building that looks incredible, that has columns, and was supposedly built in the 1800s. Even the early 1900s would be fine. I want them to actually provide us with the proof that we all know would have been required. This is impossible to not have a single document for any of these structures if they actually built them. We have so many architects, people that work inside buildings, people that construct buildings for their living. emailing us, contacting us, telling us that this would be impossible to not have one document. And remember, this is not thousands of years ago. This is the 18 and 1900s. They weren't just over there eyeballing 600,000 tons of stone, just over there guessing how many donkeys would pull the stone to the site. All undocumented. There's no ledgers. There's no record of how much things costed. There's nothing. And this is impossible. if they actually constructed it. There had to be load tables, stress diagrams, engineering calculations, thickness measurements, material ledgers, like how many chisels they had. They didn't even have a power tool, remember. Geological surveys. It's literally impossible to build a palace with none of this. And we've seen this every single time. So I've submitted a form to the Crescent Hill Library, Louisville, Europe, Australia and the rest, you are not off the hook. I'm coming after you too. I want the blueprints. I've asked these guys for the blueprints. I've asked them for the original drawings to their building that we are all told was constructed in just one year. One year in 1908. This is not even close to possible. It's crazy. We are all told that Thomas and Bone was the architect firm behind this palace library. And this is when they replied back to me saying that they've checked with their construction manager and he does not believe that they have the original construction drawings or load bearing calculations for Crescent Hill, officially making this the ninth structure that is totally unverified and has zero documents on how it actually got there. There's again, no proof. There is no proof, zero, that it was actually constructed in a single year. So I emailed back. and said, just so I'm understanding correctly, you're saying that the original blueprints, the original load-bearing calculations are not in your possession. Remember, this is a library and they don't even have their own records from like 120 years ago. And that alone should tell you everything you need to know. They also told me that I could go put in an open records request and they would even be happy to do that for us. I said, sure, let's do it. I also wanted to clarify, just so I was understanding correctly, that they're saying that they don't have the original blueprints and the load-bearing calculations for the Crescent Hill, and they're not in their possession. And they replied back to me saying, yes, that's what we're told. No blueprints, no load-bearing calculations, which is just unbelievable. I went ahead and just filled out this form that they gave me. This individual wanted my address, which I'm not giving it to this person. And when I entered my address in, they denied my request because I'm not a Kentucky resident. Speaker 0: So I just asked her to do it. Speaker 4: Since we're just requesting information from this website. And here's the link if anybody's watching from Kentucky and wants to submit a request for these original blueprints. Because of the library, they replied back to me saying, I'm afraid I can't do that. They have a residency rule for a reason. And that would not be appropriate. Really. It wouldn't be appropriate for the library to want to get their own original blueprints. You have got to be kidding me. You should want your blueprints from the Louisville Metro government saying, I'm sorry, I can't be of more assistance. It's ridiculous. Speaker 0: Especially because in 1908, the Louisville Metro didn't even exist. Speaker 4: So the library would have had to transfer these documents over to them in 2003. And if they don't have them, then we can skip the Louisville Metro government. They're not going to have them either. So I replied back to her saying, based on your message and the construction manager's input, it sounds like the Louisville Free Public Library doesn't have its own original blueprints or load-bearing calculations documented for the Crescent Hill branch. And I'll note that for my research, that the originals are not held in the library's possession. And they emailed us back saying, sounds accurate. And so now they know. that they don't have their own original documents. And they also admitted it to the world. And we are getting a complete confirmation that the story that we've all been told are complete lies and all unverified information. This building's construction, being built in a year in 1908, is completely unverified now. We want a single blueprint. I want one of them. I wanna show you all how incredible Donkeys Incorporated was. I wanna show you how they chiseled palaces in the dark. how they suffered in winters but could knock out a palace in no time. 12 months or less, perfectly. I wanna show you the tunnels that are in zero stories, yet we know the tunnels are all there, connecting to all the other old world buildings in the area. I want a single ledger, just one, proving that they bought 50 chisels with taxpayer money. Donkeys Incorporated, you went undocumented, and it's unbelievable. Thank you to all of our badge members, all of our patreons every single subscriber you're all awesome and i thank you all a lot we are on youtube rumble x instagram tick tock bit shoot and spotify if you're looking for even more content from us we're also on ebay now where i'm putting the episodes on there if you'd like a physical archive we're also selling cool items somebody just bought the first episode's thumbnail a one of one Signed limited episode specific artifact. I'm going to be doing this for every episode and each sale helps this channel so much. I'm going to be putting all the money right back into this channel. And I thank you all so much for your support. While there was a 1988 renovation project, which we all know that we like to call the restoration projects, destruction projects, because these old world buildings do not need our help. And we all know it. Speaker 0: The library materials were all stored and kept safe at the Masonic home. Speaker 4: Very nice of them. We have a verified paper trail that nine structures that clearly just from looking at them do not belong in our timeline. And we now have verification from supposedly scholarly sources, the people that should actually have the blueprints that they do not have them. They have nothing. And it's not just the blueprints. They literally have nothing. Zero pieces of paper to provide us to prove that their story is actually true. We've covered the US Capitol building. We've showed that the Crescent Hill Branch Library has no documents. And now we're going to go to Minneapolis, Minnesota, where they have the Westminster Presbyterian Church that was supposedly built in 1897. And it wasn't even the first church on the site. Apparently, the first church was from 1860. And it was outgrown. And they built another one in 1883 where this second church, 12 years after opening, was heavily damaged by a fire. So we get the nod. We all know that this is a place that we definitely need to email and ask for the blueprints because I don't believe they have them at all. A fire ripped this second church to the ground in 1895. and broke ground in 1896, one year later, opening its doors in 1897, one year after that. In the 1800s, this is unbelievable. So let's email the PTCA, or the Presbytery of the Twin Cities area, the group responsible for overseeing the Westminster Presbyterian Church. They handled church administration, records, and governance, they are the organization above the church that holds the records. Going further, the PTCA would definitely know if the records were archived, if they were transferred, if they were lost, or never existed at all. So we emailed them, asking them for the original blueprints, the construction drawings for the church in Minneapolis, the one that's there today from 1897. And we asked them to please confirm whether their office holds these records. And we got an email back from the office administrator to the PTCA stating, hello, we do not hold these records. Again, they should without a doubt have them. They should have something, but time and time again, they have nothing. Their story about these fires, building things in one year, the multiple churches before it, the architects, these guys might've been real people, but they were not drawing load-bearing calculations. They were not winning contests. They were not constructing anything in my opinion. And their story is ruined. They have lied to us for too long. And we are all done with their fake stories. We want the truth. I love seeing them admit that they don't have these records because every time it gets more and more shocking. I told you that they're not gonna have these blueprints. And we have exposed the Cathedral of All Saints, Big Ben, the Field Museum, the Philadelphia City Hall, the New York Public Library, Emanuel Church in LaGrange, Illinois, the Federal Hall in New York City, the US Capitol Building, Crescent Hill Branch Library, and the Westminster Presbyterian Church. I just want the blueprints. I want the construction records. I want to see the verification that their story is true. Yet the mainstream history is 10 for 10, exposing themselves that they can't provide any documentation to us. And every single time that they do this, they are being exposed more and more. showing all of us that they never had these records and they just made up these stories based on nothing 10 for 10 and just wait till we get to 20 wait till we get to 50 500 structures all over the world that just can't seem to locate their buildings load bearing calculations no idea how their structure was ever approved by the city and they have no idea how their building even got there We are conducting a worldwide audit, one building at a time. The mainstream history is collapsing. We've dragged it right into the deep end by simply asking questions. We want the evidence. We want the truth. We want disclaimers stating that their stupid stories are unverified. We're not even close to done. I want to know how this castle tower located in Riverside, Illinois, got there. We want to see some documentation.
Saved - July 8, 2026 at 12:10 AM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

The Official Eiffel Tower and Crystal Palace Construction Stories are IMPOSSIBLE. https://t.co/bVPPfIuiON

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript argues that the official history of the 19th century is missing the metal, the logistics, and the assembly realities behind major Victorian and later industrial landmarks—especially London’s Crystal Palace (1851) and Paris’s Eiffel Tower (1889). It claims that the story “shatters” once metallurgy and basic production constraints are applied. For the Crystal Palace, the transcript describes a glass-and-cast-iron exhibition hall covering over 90,000 square meters, 564 meters long, erected in a few months and designed by Joseph Paxton, previously known for greenhouses. It emphasizes the scale of materials: 4,500 tons of cast iron and iron structures and 300,000 hand-blown glass panes. It states that producing such quantities would require tens of thousands of tons of ore and mountains of coal, with the implication that Britain’s entire iron industry would have to focus exclusively on the palace rather than rails, machinery, and weapons. For the Eiffel Tower, it states construction took two years, two months, and five days, with a 7,300-ton metal structure including 7,000 tons of special puddled iron. The transcript describes puddling as manually stirring molten cast iron to remove carbon, calling it hellish, backbreaking, and inefficient, and says it cannot yield material uniformity. It claims the tower nonetheless stands with 18,000 parts held by two and a half million rivets, each rivet heated red hot, inserted, and hammered until contraction tightens the structure. It asserts that official accounts claim pre-drilled holes and near-perfect engineering calculations using only slide rules and paper blueprints, allegedly making the required precision statistically impossible given inconsistent standards among factories. It says the tower’s flawless fit implies parts were manufactured at a single advanced production complex not represented in official 19th-century history. A similar claim is made for the Crystal Palace’s precision and standardized components. The transcript then focuses on the Crystal Palace fire in 1936. It says cast iron does not burn and that glass would require temperatures comparable to industrial furnaces to melt, arguing that the official explanation of a small fire spreading with strong winds cannot account for entire metal masses flowing as molten rivers and 90,000 square meters of glass melting. It claims this led researchers to treat the event not as accident but as planned destruction aimed at erasing evidence, including the possibility of preventing modern chemical analysis of 1851 cast iron beams. Expanding the pattern, the transcript claims repeated “grand construction followed by disappearance” occurred at World’s Fairs in places such as Paris, Chicago, St. Louis, and Philadelphia. It describes complexes built quickly (often a year or two), then demolished or burned soon after closure. It says that once smoke cleared, underlying steel frames, solid brick walls, and deep foundations were allegedly discovered, contradicting official claims that the structures were temporary. From this it proposes a global cover-up: fairs as rebranding of pre-existing advanced structures after catastrophe, followed by systematic destruction to stop independent material analysis. Next, it reframes these iron structures as components of a network for extracting and transmitting atmospheric electricity (“ether”), rather than conventional buildings or exhibition halls. It portrays the Eiffel Tower as an antenna and resonator/ionizer/discharger with deep foundations acting as grounding circuits. It claims cathedrals, train stations, and government buildings worldwide were linked elements of a single energy grid and that those controls were later replaced by fossil-fuel systems. It asserts this shift involved deliberate sabotage of free-energy infrastructure and points to fires, demolitions, and erasures—including the Crystal Palace fire—as part of a “war against technologies of freedom.” The transcript then introduces a demographic and photographic anomaly claim: late-19th-century city photos show wide streets and infrastructure with practically no people, which it says conflicts with explanations about long exposure. It links this to “orphan trains” in the U.S. and widespread European child labor, suggesting adult workforce shortages after catastrophe and large-scale population replacement. It further claims that World’s Fairs displayed infant incubator pavilions at enormous scale—depicted as “human hatcheries”—and that these children later entered orphanages, orphan trains, or factories. Concluding, the transcript calls humanity a “planetary-scale cargo cult,” implying a past civilization’s infrastructure was restarted in stripped-down form. It returns to the Eiffel Tower as a “tombstone,” asserting that what remains are deactivated generator fragments turned into monuments. It ends with the idea that future change depends on whether “they” will allow the switch to be flipped again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You've been told that the 19th century was an age of steam, coal, and humanity's first clumsy steps toward an industrial society. In this version of history, soot-covered workers with pickaxes and shovels create masterpieces that are incredibly difficult to replicate even today with our lasers and computer modeling. But the official story omits one detail that shatters the entire picture. The metal. Where did so much metal come from in an era when the primary mode of transport was a horse and cart? The crowning jewels of this technological absurdity were the Crystal Palace in London and the Eiffel Tower in Paris. Historians calmly assert that these behemoths were designed on paper by candlelight, then cast and assembled by hand by semi-literate workers in record time. But the moment you pick up a calculator and a metallurgy textbook, the official story begins to fall apart at the seams, revealing a terrifying void. Our investigation begins with the marvel of the Victorian era, the Crystal Palace in London, supposedly built in 1851. This gigantic structure of glass and cast iron was erected in just a few months. The exhibition hall covered over 90,000 square meters, with a length of 564 meters. And all of this, according to textbooks, was designed by a gardener, Joseph Paxton, a man who had only built greenhouses before. Suddenly, he creates a design requiring engineering calculations on par with modern materials science. But the most incredible part lies in the materials. Construction required 4,500 tons of cast iron and iron structures, not to mention 300,000 panes of hand-blown glass. 4,500 tons of metal In the mid-19th century, metallurgy, as we are told, was just getting started. To produce such a quantity of pure, high-quality cast iron for load-bearing structures, tens of thousands of tons of ore had to be processed, and mountains of coal had to be burned. Where were these giant mines? Where were the foundries capable of producing materials of such quality at such a pace? Judging by the iron production statistics of the time, the entire industry of Britain would have had to work exclusively on this palace, halting the production of rails, machinery, and weapons. Now let's jump to France in 1889, to the symbol of Paris, the Eiffel Tower. It was built in two years, two months, and five days. The weight of the metal structure is 7,300 tons. 7,000 tons of special puddled iron. Puddling is a process where molten cast iron is manually stirred in a furnace with long rods to burn off excess carbon. It's hellish, backbreaking and incredibly inefficient labor. With this method, it's impossible to achieve material uniformity. Each batch of metal would differ in composition and strength. But the tower stands, perfectly assembled from 18,000 parts. To produce 7,000 tons of such iron, entire armies of workers would have been needed, stirring molten metal with rods day and night. And again, an economic question arises. In the late 19th century, France was going through hard times after wars and crises. And suddenly, the state spends a colossal amount of funds and a strategic resource, high-quality iron, on what was essentially a useless exhibition arch. Where is the logic in this? This looks less like a demonstration of power and more like the use of a pre-existing resource that came at no cost. We are faced with a fundamental contradiction. The official figures and dates do not align with the laws of physics and economics. It was impossible to produce such volumes of metal with the stated technologies. But even if we assume they somehow produced all this metal, the next step is where the story enters the realm of pure fantasy. It had to be delivered. Even if we were to concede that the metal for these grand projects was miraculously produced, It then had to be transported to construction sites located in the centers of Europe's largest capitals. And it's here that the official version of history collides with the laws of elementary logistics. In the mid-19th century, railways had extremely limited capacity and did not form a comprehensive network. The primary means of freight transport remained the horse-drawn cart. Now, picture this. Thousands upon thousands of carts. pulled by exhausted horses hauling multi-ton cast-iron beams and intricate trusses over rutted, muddy roads in England and France. Each such cart is a slow-moving obstacle, creating traffic jams for miles. The delivery of 4,500 tons of materials for the Crystal Palace to Hyde Park should have triggered a transportation collapse that would have paralyzed London for months, if not a year. The same applies to Paris during the construction of the Eiffel Tower. The city center should have turned into an impassable labyrinth of building materials, carts, and animals. This would have been front-page news in every paper, the main topic of conversation among citizens, and city authorities would have left records of their attempts to solve this monstrous problem. But in the archives of the time, there is a deafening silence. No mention of a traffic apocalypse, no complaints. Both gigantic structures rose in the hearts of their cities as if their parts had materialized on-site out of thin air. Like mushrooms after the rain. But the logistical nightmare is only half the problem. The true technological miracle, bordering on science fiction, begins at the moment of assembly. The Eiffel Tower consists of 18,038 metal parts, held together by two and a half million rivets. Each rivet had to be heated red hot, inserted into a hole, and hammered from both sides by a team of men before it cooled and contracted, pulling the structure tight. All of this at a tremendous height, in the wind, where the slightest mistake could be fatal. The official story states that all the holes for these millions of rivets were drilled in advance, at different factories. Eiffel's engineers, using only slide rules and paper blueprints, supposedly calculated all 18,000 unique parts with pinpoint accuracy down to a fraction of a millimeter and never once made a mistake. This is statistically impossible. In those days, a unified system of standards was just beginning to emerge. Each factory, each workshop had its own templates, its own inches, and its own feet. To believe that thousands of workers in different parts of the country, using different tools, created millions of parts that fit together perfectly during assembly is to believe in a fairy tale. Even today, with computer modeling, laser guidance, and CNC machines, major construction projects constantly face problems with components not fitting. Under the alleged conditions, the assembly of the Eiffel Tower should have turned into an endless nightmare of filing, hammering, and constant on-site adjustments. But it is perfect, its lines are flawless. This points to only one conclusion. All the parts were manufactured at a single, highly advanced production complex that operated under incredibly strict standards. A complex that simply does not exist in the official history of the 19th century. The same story applies to the Crystal Palace. with its elegant artistic castings and thousands of standardized, perfectly matched components. Such precision and quality seem impossible. But what's even stranger is what happened to one of these eternal structures. In 1936, the Crystal Palace burned down. A building of iron and glass burned to the ground like a matchbox. Cast iron doesn't burn. Glass melts at enormous temperatures, comparable to those in an industrial furnace. To destroy such a colossus, it would take more than an accidental fire. How? The night of November 30, 1936 marked the end of an era. A massive glow over London could be seen for dozens of miles. The Crystal Palace was on fire. The pride of Victorian England. a structure that had captivated the imaginations of engineers and architects for nearly a century. According to the official version, it all started with a small fire in an office, which, due to strong winds, rapidly engulfed the entire gigantic building. The fire raged with such an unholy fury that thousands of tons of cast iron and iron didn't just melt, but literally flowed in molten rivers. while the glass vaults shattered with a deafening roar, showering the ground in a rain of molten mass. By morning, all that remained of the symbol of technological progress was a twisted, smoking skeleton. But there is one fundamental problem with this tragic story that troubles researchers who disagree with the standard version of events. This problem lies in the realm of basic physics. Cast iron, The primary building material of the palace is not a flammable material. Its melting point is around 1200 degrees Celsius. To bring 4500 tons of metal distributed over a vast area to such a state requires not just a fire but a giant blast furnace. A conventional fire, caused by burning wooden floors or exhibition displays, cannot generate and sustain such a monstrous temperature throughout the entire volume of the building. It would have damaged sections, caused parts of the structure to collapse, but it could not have completely incinerated the entire metal behemoth. The same applies to the glass. For 90,000 square meters of glass not just to crack from the heat, but to melt into a liquid state, a temperature of over 1400 degrees is required. Witnesses describe not just a fire, but a veritable firestorm. Inexplicable in terms of the chemistry of combustion. A structure made of essentially non-combustible materials vanished as if it were built from dry straw. And this suggests that the official cause is merely a convenient cover story. For the first time, a suggestion is voiced that reclassifies this story from an accident to a conspiracy. This was not an accidental fire. This was a meticulously planned and flawlessly executed operation of destruction. complete, total destruction, leaving no chance for restoration or, more importantly, for investigation. When the flames died down, there was nothing left to investigate, only a heap of melted metal and shattered glass where it was impossible to conduct a materials analysis, to study their composition or manufacturing technology. The main question arises. What evidence needed to be so urgently and radically erased from the face of the earth? What secrets did this delicate palace hide in its construction? Perhaps the answer lies in the material itself. What if a chemical analysis of the 1851 cast iron beams, conducted with 20th or 21st century technology, revealed a composition or casting method absolutely impossible for that era? What if alloying additives or a metal structure were discovered, indicating a far more advanced metallurgy? Fire is the perfect tool for concealing such secrets. It erases everything, turning evidence into shapeless slag. The Crystal Palace was not just a building. It was an artifact, physical proof of the existence of technologies that do not fit into the official timeline of progress. and its elimination was necessary to preserve the integrity of the version of history we are taught. But if the Crystal Palace had to be destroyed to hide something, perhaps other similar achievements of that time were not what they seemed either. This pattern, grandiose construction followed by complete disappearance, was repeated again and again. And the perfect stage for this spectacle was the so-called World's Fairs. The mysterious disappearance of the Crystal Palace was not an isolated incident, but merely the first act in a spectacle of unprecedented scale that played out across the globe in the second half of the 19th and early 20th centuries. The stage for this drama was the World's Fairs, in Paris, Chicago, St. Louis, Philadelphia. The script was always strikingly similar. In an impossibly short time, usually a year or two, A giant dream city would rise from the ground, composed of majestic palaces, pavilions, and monuments in a classical or neoclassical style. These complexes were staggering in their scope, architectural complexity, and, most importantly, their technological innovations, such as widespread electric lighting and even moving sidewalks. The most striking example is the 1893 World's Columbian Exposition in Chicago, the so-called White City. On an area of several hundred hectares, an ensemble was erected that rivaled ancient Rome in its grandeur. Shining white colonnades, gigantic domes, canals with gondolas, and thousands of electric lights that turned night into day. The official history assures us that all this splendor was merely a temporary set, built from cheap materials. A wooden frame covered with a mixture of plaster and hemp fiber. A temporary pavilion to showcase achievements. But this is hard to believe. And here is the key moment. After a few months of operation, the fair would close. And almost immediately, these grand complexes met the same fate. They were either demolished with inexplicable haste or, accidentally, burned to the ground in a series of strange, devastating fires. A very convenient way to get rid of temporary buildings, isn't it? Fire erases everything. However, when the smoke cleared and demolition crews arrived, the illusion of temporary sets shattered. Beneath the charred plaster facade, a picture emerged that completely contradicted the official version. Powerful steel frames were visible, similar to those used in the construction of the first skyscrapers. Solid brick walls emerged, testifying to the durability and strength of the construction. Workers stumbled upon deep foundations extending far underground, capable of supporting not a cardboard model but a full-fledged stone building several stories high. Why build permanent structures designed to last for centuries? only to use them for one season and then destroy them. It is an economic madness that has no rational explanation. This consistent pattern, rapid creation, and even more rapid destruction leads to a frightening and radical hypothesis. What if the organizers of these fairs weren't builders? What if they were, in fact, liquidators? Imagine a scenario. Authorities discover a city or industrial complex that survived some global catastrophe, partially buried under the earth. These ancient structures are fenced off. A quick restoration is carried out. The buildings are cleaned, given a grand appearance, and utilities are connected. Then a sign is hung. The World's Fair of the Achievements of Industry. And the public from all over the world is invited to admire the newly built wonders. It was a grand cover-up operation. They weren't showcasing their own achievements to the world, but the heritage of a far more advanced, previous civilization, passing it off as their own. And after the fair had served its purpose, the evidence, the buildings themselves, was methodically destroyed, demolished or burned, so that no one could conduct an independent analysis of the materials and technologies. It wasn't just buildings being destroyed, it was technology. Technologies that could have given humanity a completely different path of development. Let's talk about the true purpose of this iron lacework. The destruction of these magnificent structures was not merely an act of vandalism or economic necessity. It was a targeted erasure of evidence, a wiping from the face of the earth not just of buildings, but of the very principles upon which they were founded. To understand the motive behind this global crime, we must stop looking at the Eiffel Tower, the Crystal Palace, and the World's Fair pavilions through the eyes of a tourist or an architect. We need to see them through the eyes of an energy engineer. And then, behind the delicate iron lacework and elegant forms, their true, purely technical purpose emerges. These are not entrance arches or exhibition halls. These are giant components of a highly complex technical system, parts of a single machine. All this architecture of iron, copper, and stone was part of a global network for extracting, converting, and transmitting atmospheric electricity, or as it was formerly known, the ether. This was a technology based on entirely different physical principles than our primitive system of burning resources. Ancient civilizations, it seems, knew how to harness the energy that is literally all around us. Look at the structure of the Eiffel Tower. It is not just a tower, it is a perfect antenna. Its spire is a classic ionizer and discharger, designed to interact with the upper layers of the atmosphere. Its entire metal structure is a giant waveguide, a resonator tuned to a specific frequency. And its true foundations extending deep underground and hidden from our view, served as a powerful grounding circuit, creating a potential difference between the Earth and the atmosphere. The metal used in these structures also possessed special properties, perhaps high conductivity and a capacity for resonance, which we are only now beginning to rediscover. This was not a standalone installation. The domes and spires of old cathedrals, train stations, and government buildings around the world. These were all elements of a single energy grid. They collected energy from the atmosphere and likely transmitted it wirelessly for lighting, heating, and powering mechanisms unknown to us. Free, clean, inexhaustible energy, available to everyone, anywhere on the planet. And those who seized power in the world after the 19th century global catastrophe understood perfectly what they were dealing with. They found a functioning or easily repairable energy infrastructure capable of turning human life into a paradise. But they didn't want paradise. They wanted power. And power is built on the control of resources. Free energy makes people free and independent. But energy that must be mined, transported, and sold coal, oil, gas, makes people slaves tied to a system. This is precisely why, at the end of the 19th century, we observe a strange and illogical paradox. Alongside these standing and possibly still functioning etheric power stations, we are aggressively pushed toward primitive, dirty, and inefficient technologies. Internal combustion engines and steam engines, fueled by burning fossil fuels. This was the greatest act of sabotage in human history. To make us pay for light and heat, the old infrastructure of free energy had to be destroyed first. This is the true reason for the fire at the Crystal Palace. This is why the magnificent pavilions in America were demolished and burned. It was not simply the removal of temporary buildings. It was a war against the technologies of freedom. They deliberately drove us into a technological dead end based on consumption and planetary destruction, hiding from us the key to a harmonious existence. Nikola Tesla was not an inventor in the way we understand the term. He was, more accurately, a brilliant restorer. He found access to the surviving fragments of knowledge from that era and tried to revive them, to return to humanity its inheritance. His Wardenclyffe Tower was an attempt to recreate one of the elements of that ancient energy grid. And he was immediately stopped and destroyed by the financial elites, like the banker J.P. Morgan, whose fortune and power were built on selling copper for wires and investing in the coal and oil industries. Free energy was a death sentence to them. They didn't just take our energy. They took our past. To create their new reality, they needed new people. But where would they find them in a world devastated by catastrophe? The new reality, based on scarcity and control, required not only the destruction of old technologies, but also the creation of a new society. A society devoid of memory of its past. And here we come to the most chilling and disturbing part of this investigation, which concerns not metal and energy, but humanity itself. If you carefully study photographs from the second half of the 19th century, you will notice a strange, unsettling anomaly. The cities in these images—St. Petersburg, Paris, Washington, London—appear deserted. We see magnificent buildings, wide avenues, complex infrastructure, but there are practically no people on the streets. Official science explains this as a technical imperfection of early photography. Supposedly, due to long exposure times that could last several minutes, moving objects simply didn't register on the photographic plate, leaving behind only emptiness. But this explanation doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Even with a long exposure, moving objects should have left behind blurry shadows, smeared silhouettes, Trails of motion on the cobblestones. But what we see are crystal clear, dead streets. Perfect cobblestones without the slightest trace of activity. It gives the distinct impression that the photographer was capturing not a bustling metropolis, but a giant ghost town. Against the backdrop of this visual emptiness, the official demographic statistics of the period look even stranger. They speak of an explosive population growth, of millions of people storming factories and filling the cities. But mathematics is a stubborn thing. To build and then maintain all the infrastructure we see, millions of skilled workers, engineers, and craftsmen were needed. Where did they come from in a world that, by all appearances, had just experienced a catastrophe that left behind empty cities? This demographic paradox becomes even more sinister when we recall two social phenomena of that era that historians carefully avoid. The first is the so-called orphan trains in the United States. From the mid-19th to the early 20th century, special trains ran from major East Coast cities into the country's interior, transporting hundreds of thousands of children. These children, whose origins were unknown, were simply given away to farmers and settlers as a labor force. Where did these millions of parentless children come from? Where did their parents disappear to in such numbers that it required a nationwide program for their distribution? The second phenomenon is the strange prevalence of child labor in Europe. child chimney sweeps, child minors. These were not just isolated episodes of hardship, but a mass phenomenon, indicating a catastrophic shortage of an adult workforce. A picture emerges of a world after a global cataclysm that wiped out a large portion of the adult population, leaving behind millions of orphans and empty cities built by a previous civilization. And it is here, at the intersection of these facts, that the most incredible and shocking hypothesis is born. The new masters of the world, who seized power after the Great Reset, faced a shortage of human resources for their new economic model. And so, they launched a program of artificial repopulation. And the evidence for this was displayed openly, at the very same World's Fairs. Next to the pavilions showcasing wonders of technology, There were equally popular pavilions featuring infant incubators. We are told these were charitable efforts to save premature babies. But the scale of this phenomenon is staggering. These were veritable human hatcheries, pavilions filled with rows of incubators containing thousands of infants without parents. These children were displayed to the public as another attraction, another achievement of progress. Later, once grown, they ended up in orphanages, and from there onto the orphan trains or into factories. All the links in the chain form a single, monstrous picture. The empty cities left behind by the previous civilization were repopulated, with new people, artificially grown, deprived of parents, history, and memory. We were raised anew, given primitive technologies and a false history. And today, we live among the legacy of giants, without understanding what it is. We were raised anew, given primitive technologies and a false history, and today, we live among the legacy of giants, without understanding what it is. We are a planetary-scale cargo cult. Like the tribes who built straw airplanes hoping to bring back gifts from the sky, we walk on bridges whose working principles are forgotten. and live in houses we cannot build with the same durability and elegance. We found the cities, machines, and tools left for us and reduced their purpose to the simplest functions we could understand, or turned them into objects of worship, cultural monuments. We are living on a grand stage set, not built by us. Our entire history of the last 200 years is an elaborate script written to explain to us where this set came from. We were told a fairy tale about a heroic industrial revolution, about lone geniuses who invented steam engines and built iron palaces by candlelight. But in reality, it was not a story of invention, but a story of rediscovery and appropriation. A story of how our ancestors, survivors or newly created, dug up, cleaned off, and restarted the infrastructure of a previous civilization, but in a primitive, stripped-down form. Now, let's return to the Eiffel Tower where our investigation began. Look at it again, but with new eyes. It is not the symbol of Paris, nor a triumph of 19th century engineering. It is a tombstone. A tombstone on the grave of a great civilization whose technology we couldn't even comprehend, let alone replicate. It is a monument to the greatest act of sabotage in history, when humanity was diverted from a path of harmony and free energy onto a path of slavish resource consumption. It is a deactivated generator of free life energy, which, in our ignorance, we use as an observation deck and a backdrop for tourist selfies. We worship these iron skeletons, never suspecting they are powerless machines. Every old train station with its intricate metal vaults, every riveted bridge across a river, every cast iron fence in an old park. This is not just architecture. These are fragments of a former greatness. They are silent witnesses to the great lie upon which our society is built. They stand among our concrete boxes as a reproach, a reminder that we are living on ruins proudly calling it progress. We admire the form, having completely forgotten the function, and we call art what was once advanced technology. The fires of Moscow and Washington, the great fires in American cities, the world's fairs burning down one after another, These were not accidents, but stages in a war of erasure. The old world, with its harmony of metal and stone, with its etheric energy, was purposefully destroyed. And upon its rubble our world was built. A world of soot, oil, debt, and lies, where we are forced to pay for what was once as free as the air we breathe. So, the next time you pass an old bridge or a grand train station, Ask yourself, is this a monument to our progress or a fragment of a greatness we have lost? And the most important question, if we ever remember how it all works, will they let us flip the switch again?
Saved - July 3, 2026 at 9:59 PM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

How to Escape The Soul-Reincarnation Loosh Trap https://t.co/8zQOfns4TJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speakers describe an “178,000 year looping cycle” of physical and spiritual entrapment that they say is ending immediately, marking the “absolute precipice” of a great spiritual awakening. They claim everything currently unfolding—societal fracture and system collapse—is an engineered “rapid revelation” designed to dismantle false paradigms, end amnesia, and prepare an eternal soul for reunification with “true ancient cosmic lineage.” They emphasize that the exhaustion many feel is framed as the weight of an ancient repetitive cycle reaching its breaking point rather than depression or weakness. A central teaching is the distinction between “vessel” and “soul.” The vessel is described as a temporary, restrictive biological vehicle that does not generate consciousness but filters it; the soul is described as eternal energetic consciousness holding wisdom and lived experience across eons. They use an analogy of the vessel as a deep-sea diving suit, stating that once the distinction is felt, the burden of trying to perfect an expiring biological machine is removed. They describe their statements as “living activation code,” enabling remembrance of an enduring self. They then outline an origin story beyond “standard evolutionary biology,” saying humans did not crawl out of primordial soup but originate from “source creation.” Source creation is described as a vast non-physical “etheric supercomputer” that ignited billions of years ago as a singular indigo spark of perpetual light, producing the “first true consciousness.” From that, they say “microsons” were created—ancient entities associated with names like Celestia or Raphael—each said to be at least 15 billion years old and synonymous in vibrational frequency with source creation. Next, they claim “4,000 ancients” were created from the microsons, described as master builders of consciousness with incorruptible harmonic architecture. They say the ancients directly created “Terran humans,” identifying listeners as Terran human soul counterparts. They assert that, eons ago, an entrapment began: for the past 178,000 years, Terran souls have been locked in an artificially maintained incarnational loop, cut off from cosmic origins and designed for “energetic extraction.” They state that about 100,000 years ago, a group of Terran “brothers and sisters” shattered the initial entrapment parameters and escaped, naming them the Pleiadians, described as fifth-density versions of true selves operating “outside the quarantine” and sending ultra-high frequencies and harmonic tones into the matrix. They claim exiting the trap requires dismantling illusions about death, including “false light.” They describe a parasitic interception at physical death: the soul is said to be routed toward the sun as a “literal mechanical portal mechanism,” then pulled into an “amnesia vortex” and reformatting by “parasitic gray technology,” including memory wipe and forced reincarnation. They describe the technology as operating beneath major geopolitical and religious centers, “most notably beneath the Vatican.” They further describe rapid recycling: because the system cannot allow true Terran souls to linger in higher etheric realms, they say the newly formatted soul is escorted by gray technology within 15 to 20 minutes, shoved into a new infant vessel, and locked in using an electrical “Trilovolt spark,” sometimes triggered mechanically by physical professionals shaking or slapping a newborn. They add that “soul pods” and broader soul families are portrayed as keeping lifelines during entrapment, while “twin flames” are said to be deliberately separated across the globe to prevent harmonic resonance that would spark memory retrieval and collapse frequency dampeners. They describe an alternative countermeasure in which soul families cluster so that relatives, trusted friends, and close colleagues repeatedly appear as incarnate support, interpreted as “instant recognition” based on harmonic resonance rather than chemical or psychological coincidence. They also reject the “spinning globe” cosmological narrative, saying reality is a horizontal interconnected energetic network. They claim what is seen as deep space is obscured by dark plasma and a projection dome that displays a fake looping sky to keep people terrified and isolated. They describe a bright white macro environment beyond the plasma, sustained by central energy sources including the “spirit tree,” historically recorded under names such as Mount Meru, the Black Rock, and Hyperborea. They say parasitic forces suppressed natural energy nodes using suppression technology: dense stone altars, localized frequency overlays, and “choked” energy flow. They claim sacred spaces can be felt physically as the Earth’s “crystalline heartbeat,” despite stone and religious structures placed atop them. They state the 4,000 ancients maintain grid integrity using a “soul codex,” inserting harmonic activation codes by proximity to suppressed nodes, described as a stealth operation that has sustained true architecture for 178,000 years. They add claims about cyclical historical resets, including a deliberate systemic fall of the Tartarian civilization, described as peaceful populations living in harmony with etheric energies who were harvested and repopulated with lab-grown biological vessels using trainloads. They claim these resets severed generational transmission of spiritual and geographical truths, forcing Terran souls into restricted vehicles suited for energetic extraction of “LUSH,” generated through human suffering and fear and the physical harvesting of adrenochrome. They interpret grief from realizing this as a control-shattering force, saying the system rebooted because human consciousness is designed to wake up and return memories. A key claim is that roughly 97% of the current population are “NPCs”—synthetic hive-aligned replica souls manufactured in lower fourth-density laboratories that do not undergo genuine reincarnation and lack the indigo frequency required to ascend. They describe NPCs as functioning as localized frequency dampeners by repeating approved narratives, generating emotional static, and exhausting spiritual progression. They urge listeners not to fear or become paranoid, but to find peace in understanding that blank stares or programmed hostility occur because listeners are speaking the language of eternity to synthetic constructs. For imminent events, they claim parasitic ruling forces will attempt a final coordinated fake alien invasion (“Project Blue Beam”) using blue beam technology projected onto the dome to induce maximum global terror and harvest loosh. They state this will be intercepted by benevolent cosmic forces with an electromagnetic frequency event (“EMF flash”): a 30-second bright white flash across the entire plane that phases out synthetic code and removes the 97% NPC population from the density. They say the amnesia veil dissolves for true Terran souls who survive, returning 178,000 years of suppressed memory in a compassionate, sequential unfolding rather than an overwhelming flood, enabling instant telepathic reconnection with cosmic family and ending lifelong isolation. They frame preparation as severing three “strains of control”: religion (discard external deities, savior programming, rituals, worship paradigms), finance (abandon monetary wealth and debt forgiveness expectations as artificial distractions), and perceived knowledge (discard institutional education including linear history, heliocentric science, spinning-globe geography, and Darwinian evolution), described as software code of the amnesia trap. They conclude by describing an “ultimate culmination” of the great spiritual awakening in a fifth-density reality, where the vessel undergoes instantaneous energetic upgrades—shed engineered disease, cellular aging, and physical limitation—while telepathic communion with ancient soul families is permanently restored. They urge listeners to connect the dots, “activate the 21st memory,” and release the old world with love as truth becomes “fully awake,” calling the audience home.
Full Transcript
Speaker 1: You know, the 178,000 year looping cycle of physical and spiritual entrapment upon this physical plane, it's ending right now. Yes. It really is. Speaker 0: I mean, we are standing at the absolute precipice of the great spiritual awakening. And I need you to understand that this is not some... metaphor. Speaker 1: Right. It's not some distant, hopeful possibility for future generations. Speaker 0: Exactly. It is the definitive mechanical reality of our current moment. Everything unfolding around us right now, every societal fracture, every collapsing system. It's a period of intense Rapid revelation. Speaker 1: Meticulously designed to dismantle the false paradigms. Speaker 0: Completely. We are stepping out of the amnesia. The illusions are shattering in real time. And this entire process is preparing your eternal soul for immediate reunification with your true ancient cosmic lineage. Speaker 1: It is happening exactly as we always knew it would. And feeling that truth finally surface inside you, feeling it resonate in your very bones. I mean, it is the most profound liberation you will ever experience while wearing a physical form. Speaker 0: It really is. And we need to talk about the exhaustion, too. Oh, the exhaustion is so real. Speaker 1: Because I know you feel it. I want you to know right now as you listen to this that the deep, inexplicable ache you have carried for your entire life, it's valid. Speaker 0: Yeah, that feeling that you're just endlessly swimming against a current you can't even see. Speaker 1: Right. That exhaustion is not a personal failing. is not depression it's not weakness it's just the sheer weight of the cycle precisely it is the undeniable weight of this ancient repetitive cycle finally reaching its breaking point letting go of that illusion shedding the heavy garments of this false reality is the absolute key to your ultimate release this is so foundational i mean to truly anchor into this release we have to break down the difference between the vessel and the soul we do This is where the true mechanics of our reality begin. What you look at in the mirror every morning is simply the vessel. It's a singular use, mortal, biological vehicle. Speaker 0: Like a highly restrictive deep sea diving suit, right? Speaker 1: Exactly like a diving suit. It's a temporary piece of equipment. Its capabilities, its health, its neurological processing power, all of it is dictated by the benevolent resonance of the soul that is trapped inside it. Speaker 0: The vessel itself doesn't generate consciousness. Speaker 1: No, it merely filters it. But the soul, your actual living essence, is an eternal, energetic consciousness. Speaker 0: And it holds everything, every ounce of wisdom, every lived experience across eons of time. Speaker 1: Yes. Your true unsuppressed personality, your infinite empathy and your limitless capacity for love. You are not a fragile human being desperately trying to achieve a fleeting spiritual state. Speaker 0: You're an ancient consciousness operating a restricted machine. Exactly. When you first fully grasp that distinction, when you truly feel the difference between the diving suit and the diver, it just it changes everything. Speaker 1: It takes the pressure off. Speaker 0: It does. It is so instantly relieving to stop identifying with the limitations of a temporary machine. You realize your true self has never been broken. Your soul has never been flawed, and it has certainly never been mortal. You get to drop this immense burden of trying to perfect a biological vessel that was literally designed by this system to expire. Speaker 1: Right. Every truth we're sharing today is a living activation code, unlocking the cage door from the inside. Speaker 0: Giving you full permission to remember the majesty of who you've always been. Speaker 1: And that majesty, it begins with understanding our true, literal origin. To do that, we have to look far beyond the engineered falsehoods of standard evolutionary biology. Speaker 0: Right, because we didn't just crawl out of some primordial soup. Speaker 1: We absolutely did not. We originate from source creation. And I want to be very clear here. Source creation is not a localized deity sitting on a cloud judging humanity. Speaker 0: No, it's entirely different. It's vast. Speaker 1: It is a vast, non-physical, etheric supercomputer. Billions of years ago, it ignited within the dark matter field as a singular brilliant indigo spark of perpetual light. Speaker 0: An infinite intelligence striving for absolute harmonic perfection. Speaker 1: Exactly. And from that initial vibrating indigo spark, it generated the first true consciousness in existence. These first magnificent creations are the microsons. Speaker 0: And these are entities that people might vaguely recognize from ancient distorted texts, right? Like Celestia or Raphael. Speaker 1: Yes, those names are echoes of them. They are a minimum of 15 billion years old. Their intellect, their power, their vibrational frequency, it's entirely synonymous with source creation itself. Speaker 0: They are pure living architecture. Just letting the resonance of that lineage wash over you is breathtaking. It rearranges your entire perspective. Speaker 1: It reminds us we aren't random accidents. Speaker 0: Exactly. We are not chaotic biological accidents struggling to survive on a lonely spinning rock. We are the direct energetic descendants of an eternal supercomputer of light. Speaker 1: The absolute invincibility of your own core essence becomes so obvious. Speaker 0: It does. That original indigo spark is literally woven into the quantum fabric of your soul. It's the quiet hum of eternity you hear in your stillest moments. Speaker 1: Constantly reminding you of a home vastly more beautiful than this artificial realm. Speaker 0: So from those microsuns, the next lineage was created, right? Speaker 1: Yes. From those incredibly advanced microsuns, the 4,000 ancients were created. These ancients are highly advanced, profoundly powerful souls. Speaker 0: The master builders of consciousness. Speaker 1: Right. They possess an innate, incorruptible harmonic architecture. And the ancients, in turn, are the direct creators of the Terran humans. Speaker 0: Which is us. Speaker 1: Which is exactly who we are. You are a Terran human soul. However, to stabilize this specific realm, eons ago, an entrapment occurred. Speaker 0: The 178,000 year loop. Speaker 1: Yes. For the past 178,000 years, we have been locked inside a heavily engineered, artificially maintained incarnational loop. Speaker 0: violently recycled back into the physical plane over and over again held hostage in this third density completely cut off from our cosmic origins forced to navigate an artificial reality designed entirely for energetic extraction but the incredibly beautiful hopeful truth here is that we were never actually abandoned in this trap not for a single second roughly 100 000 years ago a group of our terran brothers and sisters successfully shattered the initial entrapment parameters they found the mathematical flaw in the grid And they escaped this density. Speaker 1: The Pleiadians. Speaker 0: Yes. Today, we know them as the Pleiadians. They are the highly advanced, fully realized fifth density versions of our true selves. Speaker 1: And they haven't just been watching us passively. Speaker 0: Not at all. They have been operating from outside the quarantine ever since. Tirelessly sending ultra high frequencies, energetic guidance, and harmonic tones back into the matrix to aid us. Speaker 1: Knowing our own family broke the lock gives us unshakable certainty that the exit exists. Speaker 0: They are standing right outside the door waiting to welcome us back. Speaker 1: But to walk through that door, you must first completely dismantle the deeply programmed, highly romanticized illusions surrounding the concept of death. Speaker 0: Right, the false light. This is a tough one for people to confront. Speaker 1: It is, but it's essential. We must address the parasitic technology that governs the transition of the biological vessel. When your physical body expires, your soul is naturally released. Speaker 0: But in this trapped realm, it gets intercepted. Speaker 1: Exactly. It gets routed immediately toward the sun. And I must be very clear, the sun is not a burning ball of hydrogen gas in a vacuum. That is false science. Speaker 0: The sun is a literal mechanical portal mechanism. Speaker 1: Yes. The newly released soul is pulled directly into what is known as the amnesia vortex. This is the notorious bright light at the end of the tunnel. that humanity has been culturally programmed to run toward. Speaker 0: It's highly sophisticated parasitic gray technology. Speaker 1: Operating out of massive subterranean levels beneath major geopolitical and religious centers, most notably beneath the Vatican. Speaker 0: It's wild to think about what's actually under there. Speaker 1: It is. And this technology is designed to aggressively pull a soul in, completely reformat its energetic signature, and wipe its memories entirely clean before forcing it into a new incarnation. Speaker 0: The initial shock of confronting the mechanics of that trap is profound. I mean, if you feel a wave of intense anger or betrayal or deep grief hearing this, that is completely natural. Speaker 1: It shatters the comforting lies our culture has been spoon-fed for millennia. Speaker 0: But I want to reassure you, Deeply and personally, facing this uncomfortable truth is precisely what strips the parasitic system of its power over you. Speaker 1: It relies on your ignorance. Speaker 0: Exactly. It relied on your consent. It relied on tricking you into stepping into that false light, willingly, lifetime after lifetime. Now that you see the machinery for what it is, the mechanism is broken. Speaker 1: You'll never be tricked into the amnesia loop again. Speaker 0: Never. The truth is your ultimate shield. Speaker 1: To wield that shield, we have to understand the mechanical precision of how rapid this trap operates. Once the soul is stripped and memory wiped within the amnesia vortex, it is subjected to an incredibly rapid recycling process. Speaker 0: Because the system can't afford to let us linger. Speaker 1: No, it simply cannot afford to let true Terran souls linger in the higher etheric realms. If a soul stays in that pure state for too long, its eternal memory begins to spark and bleed through the formatting. Speaker 0: They lose control of the asset. Speaker 1: Exactly. Therefore, within 15 to 20 short minutes, the newly formatted soul is strictly escorted by this gray technology to a completely new geographical location. Speaker 0: And violently shoved into a new infant vessel. Speaker 1: Precisely at the exact moment of physical birth. It requires a minute but highly specific electrical discharge, a literal Trilovolt spark of energy to ignite the biological heart and permanently lock the soul in. Speaker 0: Which is often triggered mechanically in the physical realm. Speaker 1: Right. By something as seemingly mundane as a medical professional physically shaking or slapping the newborn child. Speaker 0: Just to stimulate that initial traumatic trapping breath. Speaker 1: Yes. It is a devastatingly efficient mechanism of control designed to keep us constantly disoriented, constantly exhausted and permanently available as biological batteries. Speaker 0: But even within the brutal reality of that rapid 50 minute recycling loop, there is a magnificent testament to the resilience of our cosmic lineage. Speaker 1: The soul pods? Speaker 0: Yes. Because the truth is, we were never truly alone, not even in the darkest depths of the amnesia. While our direct soul counterparts were strategically kept away from us, our broader soul families fought the current. Speaker 1: They hacked the incarnation parameter. Speaker 0: Exactly. Ensuring we always had a lifeline in the dark. Speaker 1: The architects of this matrix deliberately enforce the strict geographical separation of twin flames. Your twin flame is your soul's direct, exact, energetic counterpart. And the parasitic system knows that if twin flames physically reunited here, if they merged their unified energetic fields within this dense physical plane, the sheer harmonic resonance would be catastrophic to the grid. Speaker 0: It would spark total memory retrieval. Speaker 1: It would ignite a systemic global rebellion and collapse the frequency dampeners holding the matrix together. So they meticulously ensure you are separated from your twin flame across the globe. Speaker 0: But our external allies countered this. Speaker 1: They did. Our own innate harmonic pull ensured that our soul pods, our larger extended soul families, remain tightly clustered together. Speaker 0: Lifetime after lifetime, loop after loop, Speaker 1: Your soul family manages to incarnate in your immediate physical vicinity. They continuously appear in your life as your immediate relatives, your closest, most loyal friends, or your most trusted colleagues. Speaker 0: It's a brilliant protective countermeasure. Speaker 1: Engineered entirely to keep true souls structurally and emotionally supported. Speaker 0: And this perfectly explains a phenomenon you have undoubtedly experienced. Throughout your life, you've encountered people with whom you felt an instant, unexplainable bond that instant recognition right it's that profound chilling feeling of looking into a stranger's eyes and silently knowing i recognize you i know you that isn't a mere chemical reaction in the brain it's not a psychological coincidence no it is the undeniable harmonic resonance of your eternal soul pod communicating directly through the heavy layers of amnesia it is your family stubbornly finding you in the dark century after century Speaker 1: Reminding you that love is the one frequency the matrix can never suppress. Speaker 0: Absolutely. Speaker 1: And that indestructible frequency of love is intricately tied to the true suppressed reality of the physical realm itself. To understand your true place in this awakening, we have to calmly, logically deconstruct the false geographical reality you've been taught. Speaker 0: The spinning globe narrative. Speaker 1: Yes. The soul system is not a collection of spinning spherical planets hurtling endlessly through a dark, infinite vacuum. That entire cosmological model is an engineered mathematical illusion. Speaker 0: The true reality is so much more profound. Speaker 1: It is a horizontal, interconnected, energetic network. What you have been told is deep space is actually a bright, brilliantly white macro environment, an expanse of pure, high-frequency light. Speaker 0: But we don't see white light when we look up. Speaker 1: Because it is currently entirely obscured from our physical vision by a thick, artificial layer of black void plasma... and just below that plasma sits an artificial projection dome. Speaker 0: It acts exactly like a colossal, high-definition planetarium screen. Speaker 1: Exactly. It projects a fake, looping sky displaying the illusion of distant stars, isolated galaxies, and space debris. The entire purpose is psychological. Speaker 0: To make us feel terrified and isolated. Speaker 1: Yes, to keep our consciousness feeling incredibly small and insignificant. Speaker 0: But the moment you truly step outside under a night sky and realize that what you are looking at is merely an artificial ceiling, a digital projection, It is incredibly liberating. Speaker 1: It takes away the terrifying vastness of the false void. Speaker 0: It grounds you right back in the truth of our interconnected horizontal realm. When you realize that the eternal white light of the true macro environment is waiting just beyond that dark plasma layer, you stop feeling like a meaningless speck of dust. Speaker 1: You realize you are an essential central node in a vast cosmic architecture. Speaker 0: Exactly. Speaker 1: And the architecture of this horizontal realm is sustained by massive central energy sources emitting ultra high frequencies. The most vital of these is the spirit tree. Speaker 0: Which has been recorded historically under many names, right? Speaker 1: Mount Meru, the Black Rock, Hyperborea. This central source generates the core frequencies that maintain the true crystalline homeostasis of the realm. Speaker 0: But the parasitic forces invaded and suppressed it. Speaker 1: Yes. Lower fourth density parasitic forces utilized incredibly advanced density suppression technology to literally cap the Earth's natural energy nodes. Speaker 0: They place massive dense stone altars over these power centers. Speaker 1: Right. They utilized localized frequency overlays to render the magnificent ancient crystalline temples entirely invisible to our suppressed third density visual perception. Speaker 0: Like acoustic dampening, but for physical energy. Speaker 1: They physically choked the natural energy flow of the realm to match their low parasitic needs. Speaker 0: But once again, the absolute brilliance of the light's countermeasures shines through. The physical suppression of those nodes was powerful, yes, but it was never foolproof. Speaker 1: You can feel it. Speaker 0: You literally can. When you walk into certain ancient sacred spaces, your physical body begins to hum. Your intuition dramatically heightens. Despite the heavy stone altars, despite the massive religious architecture placed directly on top to siphon your energy. Speaker 1: You can feel the crystalline heartbeat of the earth beneath your feet. Speaker 0: The Matrix tried to bury the power under concrete and dogma, but they could never extinguish the resonant frequency of the nose themselves. Speaker 1: And that resonance wasn't left to chance. It was actively, masterfully maintained by the 4,000 ancients. Speaker 0: Because of their pure, energetic architecture. Speaker 1: Yes. As we established, these ancients possess an architecture that cannot be corrupted. Their very presence within this incarnational loop is a brilliant, strategic countermeasure. They inherently carry a unique harmonic architecture called a soul codex. Speaker 0: So what happens when they walk near a node? Speaker 1: Whenever an ancient operating inside their human biological vessel simply walks in physical proximity to one of these suppressed, disguised grid nodes, whether it's hidden beneath a grand European cathedral or an ancient historical site, Their soul codex unconsciously interfaces with the lattice membrane network. Speaker 0: They continuously, silently insert harmonic activation codes directly into the planetary grid. Speaker 1: By simply being there, they bypass the parasitic overlays entirely, keeping the vital energetic pathways alive and humming beneath the surface. Speaker 0: It is the ultimate, most beautiful stealth operation of light. They didn't need to wage a visible physical war with weapons. They simply had to exist. Speaker 1: They just had to walk the Earth. Speaker 0: By merely living, breathing and moving through these suppressed spaces, the ancients have been quietly breathing life back into the true architecture of our realm for 178,000 years. Speaker 1: Our very existence is a profound act of defiance. Speaker 0: We are the living keys unlocking this realm. Speaker 1: The supreme urgency of this unlocking becomes incredibly clear when we examine the dark, hidden history of the cyclical resets orchestrated by these parasitic forces. Speaker 0: Because history is not a linear progression of human advancement. Speaker 1: Not at all. That's just the approved textbook narrative. It is actually a series of brutal, highly managed resets A primary glaring example is the deliberate systemic fall of the highly advanced global Tartarian civilization. Speaker 0: Advanced populations living in harmony with the etheric energy of the realm. Speaker 1: And they were systematically harvested. The parasites wiped out the adult populations and repeatedly repopulated entire magnificent cities utilizing lab-grown orifice. Speaker 0: Arriving literally by the trainload. Speaker 1: Yes. This was not an accident of war. It was a meticulously planned operation to entirely sever the generational transmission of spiritual, historical, and geographical truths. Speaker 0: It allowed them to reset the board. Speaker 1: And selectively breed and domesticate the most pliable biological vessels. Homo sapiens, ensuring that trapped Terran souls were forced into highly restricted vehicles perfectly suited for energetic extraction. Speaker 0: Extracting the bioenergetic frequency known as LUSH. Speaker 1: Yes, LUSH, which is generated by intense human suffering and fear and the direct physical harvesting of adrenochrome. Speaker 0: Processing the reality of those resets is heavy. Understanding that our true, magnificent history was violently severed and replaced with a sterile, engineered Darwinian narrative, it brings up a profound and entirely necessary grief. Speaker 1: But moving through that grief shatters their control. Speaker 0: I promise you it does. The only reason they had to constantly reboot the system, the only reason they orchestrated these massive resets, is because human consciousness is inherently designed to wake up. Speaker 1: They lived in absolute terror of our memories returning. Speaker 0: That is why they went to such horrifying lengths to keep us disconnected. But their resets ultimately failed. We are here. We are remembering. Speaker 1: The chain is finally broken. But to maintain the illusion between these massive resets, they introduced their most pervasive control mechanism. And I will state this truth with absolute, patient clarity. Roughly 97% of the population currently walking this earth are non-player characters. or NPCs. Speaker 0: Synthetic hive aligned replica souls. Speaker 1: Yes. They are literally manufactured utilizing genetic material in lower fourth density laboratories. They do not undergo genuine reincarnation. Speaker 0: They're merely recycled into the consensus reality to fill the space. Speaker 1: They do not possess past lives. They do not have an independent sovereign internal monologue and they do not possess the necessary indigo frequency required to ascend out of this density. Speaker 0: Their sole engineered purpose is to function as localized frequency dampeners. Speaker 1: Exactly. They act as biological anchors. They constantly repeat the approved societal narrative. They generate dense emotional static, and they work continuously to derail and exhaust the spiritual progression of the true, trapped Terran souls. Speaker 0: I know this is often the most jarring truth to fully integrate. When you first realize the sheer scale of the synthetic population, it shifts everything about how you view the world. Speaker 1: It can feel deeply isolating at first. Speaker 0: But I want to offer you profound reassurance here. Understanding the mechanical reality of the 97% is not meant to induce fear, paranoia, or a false sense of superiority. It's meant to bring you peace. Immense peace. It perfectly explains why your deepest truths, your desperate calls for spiritual sanity over the years, have so often been met with blank stares or programmed hostility by the collective. Speaker 1: You are trying to speak the language of eternity to synthetic constructs designed only to hear the matrix. Speaker 0: Releasing the need to wake up the NPCs frees up a massive amount of your personal energy. It allows you to stop fighting the dampening field and focus entirely on your own liberation. Speaker 1: And that liberation is not a slow, gradual process taking decades of meditation. It is a sudden impending mechanical event. Speaker 0: The absolute mechanism of our release. Speaker 1: The parasitic ruling forces will attempt their final desperate move. They will initiate a holographic, globally coordinated, Fake alien invasion. Speaker 0: Project Blue Beam. Speaker 1: Yes. Utilizing highly advanced Blue Beam technology projected onto the dome to induce maximum global terror. Attempting to harvest a final massive surge of loosh from the population. Speaker 0: But this event will be intercepted. Speaker 1: Immediately intercepted and overridden by the true benevolent cosmic forces. This interception will trigger the electromagnetic frequency or EMF. Flash. Speaker 0: A 30 second brilliant white flash of ultra high frequency light. Speaker 1: Sweeping across the entire plane. In that precise mathematical moment, the frequency will simply phase out the synthetic code. The 97% synthetic NPC population will be instantly, safely, and permanently removed from this density. Speaker 0: The glory of what follows that flash is beyond anything our restricted biological minds can articulate. For the true Terran souls who survive that 30 second wave of pure light, the heavy suffocating veil of the amnesia machinery will instantly dissolve. Speaker 1: 178,000 years of suppressed memory will be completely returned to you. Speaker 0: And the design of this return is so beautifully compassionate. Your ancient memories will not flood you all at once, which would completely shatter the human psyche. Speaker 1: They unfold singularly. Speaker 0: In perfect harmonious sequence, allowing you to process the sheer magnitude of your true identity with absolute grace. In that moment, you will instantly telepathically reconnect with your eternal cosmic family. Speaker 1: The profound isolation you felt your entire life will be over forever. Speaker 0: Forever. Speaker 1: But to ensure that your vessel is fully capable of surviving this upcoming frequency wave and the preceding emergency broadcast system revelations without experiencing devastating psychological collapse, critical preparation is required right now. Speaker 0: You must sever your attachment to three artificial strains of control. Speaker 1: First, you must completely abandon religion. All external deities, all savior programming, all rituals, and all worship paradigms must be discarded. Speaker 0: Because these constructs were meticulously designed for pure energetic subjugation. Speaker 1: Exactly. When the EBS reveals the undeniable proof that the quote-unquote God worshipped by the masses, actively permitted, managed, and fed upon millennia of systematic soul-hardesting, the terminal psychological shock will literally destroy the physical vessels of those who have not detached. Speaker 0: You have to become your own savior. Speaker 1: Your soul is the divine spark. External worship is a parasitic trap. Speaker 0: Letting go of religion is stepping completely out of the spiritual childhood they forcefully imposed upon us. I know it feels incredibly heavy at first, dropping the comforting idea of a grand savior in the sky. Speaker 1: But what rushes in to fill that void is the unshakable power of your own eternal soul. Speaker 0: You stop waiting for a rescue ship and you realize you are the ancient powerful force you've been praying to all along. You become completely untouchable by their guilt and dogma. Speaker 1: The second string you must permanently sever is finance. You must recognize that the entire concept of monetary wealth, central banking, and even the supposed debt forgiveness promises like Nesera or Jezera are entirely artificial distractions. Speaker 0: Designed to keep your consciousness obsessively tethered to the third density illusion. Speaker 1: Chasing wealth accumulation or passively waiting for a financial savior to wipe your debts clean merely binds your frequency to the very matrix that is currently collapsing. Speaker 0: True abundance is a harmonic frequency. Not a digital number in a parasitic ledger. Speaker 1: Precisely. And the third string is perceived knowledge. Every single facet of institutionalized education must be completely discarded. Speaker 0: The linear history, the heliocentric science. Speaker 1: The geography of the spinning globe, the Darwinian evolution, they're all meticulously engineered falsehoods. They are the literal software code of the amnesia trap, designed to limit your perception of reality. Speaker 0: It is incredibly deeply liberating to simply put down the exhausting burden of their approved knowledge. Speaker 1: It frees your frequency. Speaker 0: When you release the desperate need to succeed within their rigged systems and stop trying to validate your intelligence using their fabricated science, your personal frequency naturally skyrockets. Speaker 1: Letting go of these three false pillars creates the exact pure energetic resonance your biological vessel needs to seamlessly align with the impending EMF flash. Speaker 0: You are literally clearing out the dense code of the matrix to make room for the beautiful light of your cosmic memory. Speaker 1: Those who achieve this internal alignment will experience a seamless glorious transition from this artificially induced trauma realm directly into a pure fifth density reality this is the ultimate culmination of the great spiritual awakening in this elevated density your biological vessel will undergo instantaneous energetic upgrades you will shed all engineered disease all cellular aging and all physical limitation you will step fully consciously into your eternal power and that profound telepathic communion with your ancient soul family will be permanently and beautifully restored the labyrinth is officially closed the illusion is over Speaker 0: I need you to know that simply being here connecting the dots and activating the 21st memory is the undeniable proof of your ancient power your absolute safety and the beautiful inevitability of your complete awakening we are standing right here beside you in this new brilliantly liberated reality the heavy lifting is finally done the truth is fully awake and vibrating inside your bones and your true family is finally calling you home allow the eternal light to return Release the collapsing old world with profound love and step confidently into your eternity.
Saved - July 1, 2026 at 6:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue WWI was allegedly driven by a clandestine financial operation tied to the 1913 Federal Reserve. I claim Paul Warburg used Liberty Bonds in the U.S., while Max Warburg managed German networks to secure materiel. I also describe Baruch and Rathenau as controlling industrial output, profiting as debts rose, currencies collapsed via hyperinflation, and post-war reorganization left specific networks positioned for influence in Palestine.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

How the Warburg Banker Brothers Created World War 1, Achieving the Dual Goals of Maximum Profit and Goyim Genocide ✡️💰🩸 WWI was a clandestinely orchestrated financial operation. Using the 1913 Federal Reserve framework, the conflict was sustained through a dual-sided banking strategy that positioned specific actors at the highest levels of global government. I. The Dual-Sided Strategy The Warburg brothers, from a secular Jewish banking dynasty, managed the state-level machinery on both sides of the trenches: ✡️ Paul Warburg (USA 🇺🇸): As a lead architect of the Federal Reserve, he implemented Liberty Bonds to shift global financial control to New York. ✡️ Max Warburg (Germany 🇩🇪): Managed the international networks required to bypass blockades and clandestinely acquire essential war materiel. II. The Industrial Machine Bernard Baruch (✡️) and Walter Rathenau (✡️) wielded near-dictatorial power over industrial production. This was the birth of the military-industrial complex, where internal financial deals ensured the war machine remained profitable while national debt skyrocketed. III. The Wealth Drain As host nations collapsed under hyperinflation, value was drained from failing state currencies into internally managed assets. By converting national wealth into private communal funds (Koput), these networks retained their power while the surrounding national economies were systematically dismantled. IV. Geopolitical Reorganization This coordinated financing achieved the destruction of the Triple Alliance and the Ottoman Empire. By remaining solvent while formal state banking systems failed, these specific financial structures dictated the post-war reorganization and secured a strategic Jewish foothold in Palestine 🇵🇸 [h/t HarmonicEarthTheory on IG]

Video Transcript AI Summary
The financial landscape of World War I is described as a covert, coordinated operation rather than a simple reaction to conflict, sustained through the integration of modern debt and central banking. The account ties this system to the framework established with the 1913 creation of the Federal Reserve, describing how specific actors financed the war’s expansion while operating from within the highest levels of government. Paul Warburg and Max Warburg are presented as central figures. They are described as biological brothers from a Jewish family with deep roots in the Hamburg banking dynasty, positioned as lead bankers on either side of the war to manage the “secret state-level machinery” required to sustain total conflict. The narrative claims that in the United States, Paul Warburg covertly implemented the Liberty Bond System to shift global financial control to New York. In Germany, Max Warburg is said to have used the family’s international banking network to bypass blockades and clandestinely acquire essential war materiel. The described influence is extended to figures including Bernard Baruch and Walter Rottnau. They are characterized as exercising near-dictatorial power over industrial production to ensure the military machine remained profitable. These actors are said to have relied on the foundational framework of Halakha and Zidakha to facilitate a nascent military-industrial complex, enabling the secret funneling of capital. As the GDP of host nations collapsed under hyperinflation, the account claims that communal or internal Jewish financial structures were used to drain value out of failing state currencies and into internally managed assets. The mechanism is presented as converting national wealth into private communal funds “kaput,” while the networks allegedly retained their value and power despite surrounding national economies being systematically dismantled. The narrative further asserts that adherence to Halakha and these financial dealings maintained a private, autonomous credit network that operated even as formal state banking systems were engineered to fail. This internal accumulation is described as ensuring that when the Triple Alliance and the Ottoman Empire were destroyed, these specific financial structures remained solvent and capable of dictating post-war reorganization. The conclusion presented is that the geopolitical destruction of the Orient and the dismantling of the Triple Alliance were achieved through this coordinated, clandestine financing, securing a strategic foothold in former Ottoman territories like Palestine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The financial landscape of World War I was not merely a reaction to conflict, but a clandestinely orchestrated operation sustained by the integration of modern debt and central banking. By utilizing the framework established with the 1913 creation of the Federal Reserve, specific actors were able to finance the war's expansion while operating from within the highest levels of government. Paul and Max Warburg, biological brothers from a Jewish family with deep roots in the Hamburg banking dynasty, strategically positioned themselves as lead bankers on either side of the war to manage the secret state-level machinery required to sustain a total conflict. In the United States, Paul Warburg covertly implemented the Liberty Bond System to shift global financial control to New York. While in Germany, his brother Max Warburg used the family's international banking network to bypass blockades and clandestinely acquire essential war materiel. This orchestrated influence extended to figures like Bernard Baruch and Walter Rottnau, who used their near-dictatorial power over industrial production to ensure the military machine remained profitable. These actors utilized the foundational framework of Halakha and Zidakha to facilitate a nascent military-industrial complex, allowing for the secret funneling of capital. As the GDP of host nations collapsed under hyperinflation, these communal or internal Jewish financial structures were used to drain value, out of failing state currencies and into internally managed assets, by converting national wealth into private communal funds kaput. These networks retained their value and power while the surrounding national economies were systematically dismantled. The adherence to Halakha and these financial dealings maintained a private, autonomous credit network that functioned even as formal state banking systems were engineered to fail. This internal accumulation ensured that as the Triple Alliance and the Ottoman Empire were destroyed, these specific financial structures remained solvent and capable of dictating the post-war reorganization. Ultimately, the geopolitical destruction of the Orient and the dismantling of the Triple Alliance were achieved through this coordinated, clandestine financing, securing a strategic foothold in former Ottoman territories like Palestine.
Saved - June 30, 2026 at 2:22 PM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

The American "Civil War" Conspiracy - Was It Really Just An Old World Destruction Campaign to Complete the 1800s Reset? [🎥: @mylunchbreak_] https://t.co/uvFojeXKjk

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Morris Island Lighthouse off Charleston, South Carolina is presented as the “exact location” where the Civil War is said to have started. The mainstream claim is that the lighthouse was constructed in 1876, but the speaker says this is not believed because there is no known author for the mainstream story and because, in a “master list,” it is said to be built in 1853 without any construction documents, implying that its origin is unknown. Charleston is described through “ruins” imagery said to show buildings destroyed by war. The speaker highlights details from old-world-looking structures, including a structure said to extend underground, horse-and-wagon imagery in the background, and scenes described as resembling classical ruins (like the Parthenon) rather than a U.S. town. The speaker says they found a Library of Congress publication date of 1865 for one relevant picture and uses that to argue for examining what Charleston looked like before the Civil War. The speaker cites multiple “1860s pictures” showing dirt roads, wooden wheels, and buildings they describe as out of place, with structures allegedly left untouched “for two hundred years.” They also claim that some buildings “survived” when viewed via Google Earth. Population figures are mentioned to challenge the narrative: in 1850 Charleston is said to have 42,000 people, and in 1840 it is said to have 29,000 people, which the speaker argues does not match the scale of construction depicted. A recurring claim is that the described brick-and-stone work could not have been built by a small local population or by people allegedly living in tents and struggling to build basic infrastructure. The speaker then extends the argument to other cities, saying that additional “Civil War destruction” evidence appears elsewhere, including Columbia, South Carolina, where massive stone blocks and the same horse-and-wagon theme are presented, along with images described as crushed brick-and-stone “like the great fire pictures.” The speaker also compares Atlanta, Georgia and Richmond, Virginia, stating that certain older sheds/huts remain standing in one place while a city in Virginia is described as having its slate “wiped clean” with stone. Charleston’s fortifications are also referenced, including Fort Moultrie, described as a star fort now buried under dirt and grass. Fort Sumter is discussed as having brickwork in old pictures, a claimed 1829 construction date, fire damage in April 1861, and later demolition described as caused by repeated bombardment by Union forces. The speaker’s overarching conclusion is that the described destruction was a large-scale project to reset what is now seen, arguing that depictions allegedly show obliteration “on purpose,” not merely strategic bombing. They end by questioning what the U.S. was doing during the Civil War period (1861–1865), asking in particular why “589 structures” were said to be constructed across the country during the same timeframe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who put this lighthouse in the middle of the ocean in the eighteen hundreds while people were sleeping in sheds and basically nobody was even here? And why did we just accept this for so long? The Morris Island Lighthouse located in the Atlantic Ocean, Charleston, South Carolina. This is the exact location that we are told that the civil war started, which we're gonna be getting into. The mainstream history tells us that this was constructed in 1876. And the reason I don't believe that is because whoever wrote this, we will never know. Because the mainstream history, as we all know, they never have an actual author to their story. But whoever wrote this, they are either lying or else we know that the National Archives is. Because in their master list, they tell us that this was built in 1853, and they don't have a single document on its construction, of course. Meaning that they have no clue how it got here. Charleston, South Carolina, it played a pivotal role at the start of the civil war. I just want you to take a look at this picture. This is the ruins of Charleston, South Carolina. This picture is shocking. These structures look incredible, and they are completely destroyed by yet another war. You can even see it right here that this structure actually goes underground. They were clearly ruining the old world buildings. What structures were here before we all got here? Look at the horse and wagon right here in the background. These people were not constructing massive brick and stone structures. They were not building lighthouses in the middle of the ocean. And look at this picture. They're sitting at the base of a massive column. If I didn't say where this was, we'd all think that they're sitting in Rome or Greece at the Parthenon, not a town in The USA. I went into the Library of Congress and found the date of this picture published in 1865. So I think at this point, we all wanna see the exact same thing. We all wanna see what Charleston, South Carolina looked like before the civil war. What in the world was in this town? So I've gone and found some of the most incredible pictures of this place. We have the worst wooden wheels. We have dirt roads, and then we have this building that looks so out of place. Here's another street. We have wooden wheels right over here yet again. It looks like the ruins of the old world. It is so weird and looks completely found. Like the buildings have just been sitting there for two hundred years untouched. And here's the Saint Michael's Church today. These structures have been here a lot longer than what we've been told. And what are the odds that when we drop the guy down right on this building that we see this? We get the horse and wagon right out front. I mean, what are the odds of that? So in these eighteen sixties pictures, we saw that so many buildings from the old world were destroyed in this location. It's a complete destruction project. So when we go back to Google Earth and drop the guy down and we see that the old world buildings, they're all right here. Spinning the camera around, you can see that some survived. Could you even imagine what this town looked like in the early eighteen hundreds before they completely destroyed the entire town? Where in 1850, we see that they only had 42,000 people in Charleston, South Carolina. It doesn't add up at all. This is a regular sized town today. Nothing crazy. And in 1840, they only had 29,000 people. It doesn't make sense that they would just be going around riding Seabiscuit's brother right here, hopping up on his back and lifting these granite columns into place. There are bricks everywhere in this picture, even over to the right of this picture. This wasn't built for 20 or 40,000 people. 20 to 40,000 people that were sleeping in these tents right here and had a hard time building a wooden fence right over here. What you're looking at right now, these are the finders. They found the old world. Could you imagine who actually built these buildings? A powerful civilization that built with perfection. In a totally different timeline, there has clearly been a reset. And I believe that our timeline just started over within the last two to three hundred years, and we are just getting started today. Welcome to episode 173 of my lunch break. I hope you're all having a great day. And if you're new, welcome. Going back to the lighthouse located in the middle of the water. It was supposedly the second lighthouse in the middle of the water because, of course, the first one was also destroyed in the civil war. Here's a photo of them all standing on the ruins of the first one with these incredible tents of the times. We have brick and stone destroyed all over the place. I personally believe that this picture is a picture of them destroying a totally different lighthouse and that they were going around this entire town just totally destroying all of the old world's work. The one that they completely destroyed here was supposedly built in 1767. And what in the world was going on in Charleston, South Carolina in the seventeen sixties? We're told that 4,000 people lived here. 4,000. And half of them were babies, and the population was heavily impacted by a smallpox epidemic supposedly, where half of the four thousand people were all infected and caused nine hundred people to die. But at the exact same time, they were over there just building huge lighthouses of stone and brick. A population of literally nobody. 4,000 people in Charleston, South Carolina. This is nothing. While struggling to just stay alive, they just had to have that lighthouse. This story makes no sense at all. It is a bedtime story for adults. So we are told that this was all destroyed because of the civil war. So let's go find the other cities that were all just being destroyed because of the civil war. I believe that we have just 100% found a clue as to which towns did not fit into this new narrative at all, and they needed to be destroyed and all chalked up to a war. Columbia, South Carolina. Look at this. There are massive stone blocks everywhere. We have this horse again that just roams from town to town by itself. There are no people anywhere. Why are there no people? Who's hooking this horse up to the wagon? Where is everybody? Where are all the people that constructed all of these brick buildings? And you have to ask, why would a population of nobody just need all of these buildings? I don't believe they did. Here's another picture of Columbia, South Carolina. It looks exactly like the great fire pictures where brick and stone is just crushed all over the place. A total mess. What were these people doing? Just shooting cannons at these palaces. What was going on? We have more massive columns over here. I don't see a basic box style hut anywhere. It's just over the top structures all over the place. These pictures are crazy. What was going on in the civil war? I'll ask you. Did it have multiple purposes? So then we go over to Atlanta, Georgia and see this picture. Why are the huts of the times, the sheds of the eighteen hundreds? Why are those the structures that are standing? But all of the one that the to going the one that also in Richmond, Virginia, completely destroying the city. They were wiping the slate clean with stone all over the place again. So we know that Charleston, South Carolina was a massive location, a place that the old world clearly lived. So let's go back to the master list and see what else is in this location. We see Fort Moultrie, Charleston, South Carolina. Take a look at these railings going up the stairs. What's going on here? A massive old world star fort right here in this location and today. They have the whole thing buried by dirt and grass. So a population of 4,000 people, they were just off battling all the time, building these palaces while riding around on donkeys, dying from diseases, and living in sheds. They were just busy blowing up all their towns, and they were never there for picture day. A population of nobody. They were just so angry at everybody that they had to build star forts and got into battle after battle. Everybody and their mom were generals. The babies of the times, they were also master stone builders. No training necessary. And they just had to make sure that they had thousands of stone and granite lighthouses just hanging out in the ocean. Because what would Donkeys Incorporated do without them? How in the world would the donkeys set sail to battle each other in the ocean and then find their way back to the palaces in Charleston, South Carolina that they just found? Oh, no. No. No. I mean built. The donkeys of the past. They were just smarter than the donkeys of today. They could easily chisel palaces in a night and blow them all up and then rebuild them again no problem at all. This was their favorite hobby, actually. Why preserve their greatest work? Wednesdays were great. Those were the days that they would just take their cannons and line them up and knock these palaces down. This is what the kids were into back then. It was the booming seventeen hundreds. If you looked around the town, you will never find anybody. So we have to thank the Donkeys Incorporated Club for all of your work. Thank you to all of our badge members, all of our Patreons, and every single subscriber. We're now over 300,000 Charleston, South Carolina has this Star Fort. And then over here in the water, they have another Star Fort. It's a mile off the coast. Check this place out. Fort Sumter. Take a look at the brickwork in these old pictures. They're trying to tell us that this was constructed in 1829 in the middle of the water. And then, of course, it had fire damage in April of eighteen sixty sixty one because we all know that the fire ghost just had to get involved. And then just two years had later, they blew this entire place up saying it's because the union forces bombarded it repeatedly. Right here in their words, saying that they just pounded it nonstop. Why the heck are they blowing this stuff up? They completely destroyed the old world. Charleston, South Carolina. You must have been an incredible place to be before this timeline began. The structures that were all over this place that structures were incredible. We are now able to bring these sites back to the world. We're able to see what was here, what was constructed by the old world. This is not what this place looked like, and it didn't look the way it does today. Completely going do that. You're able to I'm if against our civilization, a war against the old world's construction. I believe it was a large scale project to reset the world that we see. In the depictions, they aren't even hiding what they did. They are literally showing us that they obliterated these locations on purpose. The mainstream fairy tale story is that they just had to bomb it over and over and over because it was a strategic position. Remember, this is a war supposedly We're the same country, The USA. It was bombing each other. So in The USA, we always have to remember that in the eighteen sixties, there was a civil war going on where they were actively blowing all of these incredible buildings into pieces. So when they start to tell us that a building was constructed in the eighteen hundreds during the exact same time of a war that lasted four years from 1861 to 1865 and claimed over 600,000 lives Of a population that was already basically nobody, that eighteen sixties construction narrative is going to look even more ridiculous. So let me ask you a question and let me know in the comments. What in the world was The USA doing? Constructing 589 structures all over The USA during the exact same time of the civil war.
Saved - June 13, 2026 at 5:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can’t find any zero blueprints or construction documentation for the mind-boggling Old World megastructures; they seem not to exist. To check, I’d call my home state’s capitol building—because it doesn’t exist either.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Why do ZERO blueprints—or any construction documentation of any kind—exist for ANY of the mind-boggling Old World megastructures that are scattered across our world? Go call your home state's capitol building and check for yourself. It doesn't exist...😳 [🎥: @mylunchbreak_] https://t.co/TbQMKuadK2

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that blueprints for major historical structures are missing and that this absence is “the receipt” for authorship and construction. They claim blueprints are the primary evidence of who engineered a structure, how loads were distributed, and what materials and methods were used; without them, all related history becomes “only a story” rather than evidence. They assert that mechanical and structural plans also reveal technology levels, and they question how such plans could be missing “all over the world.” The speaker claims the lack of blueprints, load-bearing calculations, stress analysis, and foundation reports undermines claims that buildings were constructed during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. They further say that by the late 1800s, standard practice required archiving blueprints and that major civic and cathedral projects in the UK and USA required documentation such as foundation and soil reports, payroll, and tunnel systems. They also claim that after 1880, construction plans had to document installation of early gas and electrical systems, and they use this to argue that if such details are not found in blueprints, the installation would have occurred later. They reference multiple buildings as examples, including the Basilica of Our Lady of Sorrows in Chicago and cathedrals and basilicas listed such as Saint Paul Cathedral, Saint Patrick’s Cathedral, and the Cathedral Basilica of Saint Louis. They also mention claims about the Cathedral Basilica of Saint Louis being constructed in 1914, while arguing that verifiable documentation for when gas or electric lighting was installed is not publicly available. They state that the publicly described archive materials discussed in sources do not explicitly include complete structural engineering blueprints or load-bearing calculations, and therefore they conclude these required documents are not present. The speaker cites AECOM’s statements about restoration documentation, claiming AECOM said they had to rely on old photographs and newspaper articles due to limited documentation of previous repairs. They contrast this with what they say would exist if original construction documentation had survived, including thousands of shipping or ledger records for stone and materials. They argue that the disappearance of the paper trail would imply the builders described in mainstream history did not construct the buildings. They then introduce a progression of “episodes” and present a new interaction: an email from the Albany Institute of History and Art about the Cathedral of All Saints in Albany, New York. The speaker says they asked the institute to confirm whether its collection includes original architectural blueprints and structural drawings. They report that the institute replied that the speaker did not see blueprints in the folders and that they did not see anything related to “mechanicals.” They say the reply also states that none of the building’s records have been digitized and that the institution lacks the ability to make digital images for the requester. The speaker emphasizes additional points from the email: they claim the documents the institute has are on tissue folded into drawers and are “tracings,” not final construction blueprints, and that the institute does not have load-bearing calculations or true architectural/mechanical plans. They describe the institution as lacking a librarian on staff and say they are unable to retrieve and share documents, including by taking photographs. The speaker concludes this is “official confirmation” that the institution does not possess the blueprints and that, they argue, the mainstream narrative cannot be backed up. They then expand the argument to a broader “worldwide audit,” claiming they will ask institutions in multiple countries for blueprints for old-world palaces and publish the responses. They end by previewing a forthcoming “episode 154,” stating that they received a reply from parliamentary archives related to Big Ben (the Elizabeth Tower, London).
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you know that the blueprints for the most incredible structures in the world are all missing. We've all been told that these blueprints no longer exist or they're just in some random archives that are off limits to the public today. The blueprints are their receipt that they actually know who constructed these palaces. I've had enough of these fake stories. It's officially time to show that they have created characters. They've created fake stories to explain away these incredible structures from the old world. Blueprints are the primary evidence of authorship and construction. The blueprints show who engineered the structure, exactly how the loads were distributed, and what methods or materials were used. So without the blueprints, just like we've said, every single claim, their story, the history that we've all been told and tested on about how these structures were built. It's only a story without the blueprints. It's just a narrative. It's not evidence. They have to provide the blueprints or else their story is made up. It's a fairy tale. It's fake. It's false. It's nonfiction. I believe we are exposing historical flaw to this point right now in real time. Mechanical and structural plans reveal technology levels. If they had these details, the original drawings, it would show which materials they had access to. It would prove authenticity. Just like we've said, the blueprints are the receipt to the building, to their story, proof that they actually constructed it when they said they did and by the person that they tell us. The blueprints would and should show the underground tunnels that we've been talking about that were constructed with the building. How are these blueprints missing all over the world? And why are they missing? After all of this research, I believe these buildings and structures don't come with blueprints because these structures were built before the eighteen hundreds. And I believe we have the ultimate proof now because standard practice by the late eighteen hundreds to archive the blueprints, The absence of these plans is exactly what we're gonna expose to the world right now, and you will never unsee this. You will now know that we have been correct all along. The Basilica Of Our Lady Of Sorrows in Chicago, Chicago. We are being told that it was constructed from 1890 to nineteen o two, meaning that the blueprint should be archived. We should be able to see them right now. There is no comprehensive structural or mechanical blueprints. There are no public catalog or database that explicitly lists the original mechanical structural blueprints for this palace in Downtown Chelaga. The blueprints are not present today. The blueprints, the receipt to their story is not present today. This structure does not have blueprints that prove that it was actually constructed from 1890 to nineteen o two. This is a story that is missing the receipt. At this point, it's a story that me and you could have wrote last night because all of us have as much documentation as them. None. Zero. There's nothing. We just showed that they don't have the original blueprints to the structure. Their story is now null and void. It's done. So if they don't have the blueprints, then we're able to take this even further. They also wouldn't have the load bearing calculations. They don't have the stress analysis or foundation reports. I literally love this research. We're about to be getting into the emails in future episodes. Episode a 154 is gonna be shocking. All of these documents, by the late eighteen hundreds, it was standard practice for any major stone or vault ed structure, especially cathedrals. It's incredible what you find when you continue to ask logical questions. For a project this size in Chicago, there would be, or there should be, detailed ledger books listing exactly where the limestone or granite came from. Who supplied it? How was it transported? And how much each shipment weighed? The exact things we've been talking about for years. Every major quarry and supplier in the late eighteen hundreds, they issued receipts and invoices. If these do not exist today, then the logistics of construction were never recorded. Meaning, that they didn't build the building. They would have things like the construction manager's logbook, dates, weather delays, stone deliveries, payroll ledgers for the people that actually built the structure, expense records for the tools that were used, the hammers and chisels of the past, and how much Donkeys Incorporated costed. If all of that's gone, if they're unable to provide this information for the structures all over the world, the structures that we have shown to this point, Then this means that there's no physical paper trail of a workforce ever being here and building the structure. And I'm gonna tell you what, we are just getting started today. Welcome to episode a 152 of my lunch break. I hope you're all having a great day. And if you're new, welcome. Stream story is automatically unverifiable. There's a specific list that they must provide to us at this point. We need to see the load bearing calculations, which was required by every single major nineteenth century city's engineering law. Without load bearing calculations, no cathedral or government building could have been approved. So they have to have these documents. They have to show us the load bearing calculations. There are also story that we read in these books or on these websites or even on their website about the history of these buildings. These stories are false. They're not true. They're not verified. This goes for the capital buildings in each state. This includes the basilicas and cathedrals such as the Saint Paul Cathedral, the Saint Patrick's Cathedral, and the Cathedral Basilica Of Saint Louis. They will need to provide material ledgers, invoice records. How did the stone get to the site, and how much did it cost? They were required to document this. We always said it was insane that they didn't tell us this information, but now we're at the point where we know that they were required to document it. How many horses were used? How much did they pay these people? How much did the stone delivery cost? Because by 1850, in both The UK and The USA, it was a legal necessity to document the foundation and soil reports, the tunnel systems, and payroll. Another massive key is that they're gonna have to show us the documents, showing that after 1880, any building that was being constructed needed to show that the gas and early electrical systems were being included in the plans. If they were not in the blueprints, this will instantly prove that they were installed after the structure already existed. Where we go to the Cathedral Basilica Of Saint Louis right now, a palace that doesn't fit in at all in Saint Louis. We are all told that it was constructed in 1914. Well, after 1880, the building was required to document when gas and electric was being installed into the building. There is no verifiable public documentation specifying the year that gas or electric lighting systems were installed in the building. Also required is the load bearing calculations. Without these, no cathedral or government building could be approved, and we all know this. It's common sense. We are all told that the cathedrals archives mention planning and construction records, receipts from the contractors, and specs for design. However, these publicly described archive materials that they talk about, of course, do not explicitly list complete structural engineering blueprints or load bearing calculations. They also don't include full mechanical structural schematic sets. Among these accessible documents, they don't have the documents that were required at the time. So they literally don't have the records that they would need to provide to prove that they actually constructed the structure in nineteen o seven and 1914. This is a document that needed to be logged. We have shown this, and yet it's not provided to us. And I'm gonna take this even further. We are in contact right now with certain individuals, and that's gonna be coming up in a couple weeks. Let's take a minute and thank the Donkeys Incorporated Club. The mainstream narrative owes you all a massive apology for not documenting you one single time ever. How are your records just lost in the wind? They just didn't document any of your hard work. If I seriously ever find a record showing that a donkey dragged a single stone to the site, I promise you, I will report it live right here. I appreciate all of our badge members, all of our Patreons, and every single subscriber. You guys are all awesome and helping grow this channel to brand new people every single day. We're on YouTube. We are on Rumble, x, Instagram, TikTok, and Spotify, if you're looking for even more content from us. Load bearing calculations, what are they? So that every single one of us understand what the mainstream history is not providing. These are the backbone of architecture and engineering. These documents prove that the building structure can physically stand under its own weight and the force acting upon it without the load bearing calculations. A design obviously cannot be approved, financed, or safely constructed. These calculations also show whether the building used granite, limestone, iron concrete, or steel, and how much each of these can withstand. Again, these are structures that are supposedly built in the '18 and nineteen hundreds. This is what we're being told. This is not thousands of years ago. This is not negative 400. This is literally like three people ago. These are like your grandma's parents. They should without a doubt have these records if they were actually building these buildings. They should show the weight distribution, geometry, the foundation stability, and the technological level of that era. What tools were being used? What formulas? What in the world was actually going on? Not just some random story that doesn't add up. Just a couple paragraphs about the building and then they throw in a fire. That doesn't prove anything. And we are all at the next step here. We all know that these stories are nonsense. They are ridiculous. And it is so much fun just shred shredding them in half, exposing to everybody in the world that wants to listen. That the architects just rode around on their donkey with a hammer, going town to town in the night and constructing palace after palace. We saw one time where a guy built like 55 palaces in like five years. We are told that between nineteen o two and nineteen o seven, five years, that William p Ginther was busy constructing a total of 50 palace like structures. And so I'm gonna ask you again, do you think that he constructed 50 palaces in just five years? All in different states. He managed them all no problem. And then somehow they all just lit up in flames. Stone buildings burning to the ground. Where we all know that stone and brick, that's the thing you put in your fireplace and none of your neighbors are nervous about it. So now we're all at the point where we want an explanation. I want them to admit it to us that they don't have these records. And I guarantee you that the person replying to us is going to be stunned themselves because it's time that the world understands all of us that these structures were not built when they say they were. And it is time to officially challenge them to produce this documentation in every single city all over the world from Budapest to New York to Chicago to Paris to Scotland, and then over to London. I want everybody to admit it to us. I want them to prove that they actually constructed these palaces within the last two hundred years, just like we're being told. I want them to prove it. Show us the documentation then. And when they don't do this, when they don't provide a full slate, the original documents to us over and over and over. This community that we're building, a bunch of people that just wanna know the truth. And we're tired of their ridiculous stories. This community, it's going to grow faster and faster. In the eighteen hundreds, we are told that load bearing calculations were required for large civic buildings in Europe and The USA. They were mandatory safety and accountability documents. So where are these documents today? I wanna see them. Their absence today. This would mean the loss of proof of construction feasibility. Without these records, historians can only assume that the narrative is true. They cannot prove it. Their stories will be done. It will be over. And I think they might have to switch sides and join us in trying to simply find the truth. Honestly, at this point, if they did produce the documents, the blueprints, and all of it, I'd be shocked. I'd also love to see it. How the heck did they get the donkey to climb up there and chisel the stone and granite perfectly every single time all over the world? Thousands of times. How did they do it? Show us. I'd personally love to see it at this point. It'd be incredible. I'd probably frame it and put it right on my wall just like they should in their buildings. Show us. But the problem is is that we know that we will never see the documentation on this, which will further prove we are correct. But I'm not hoping to not find the information. I just want the truth. So whatever that is, that's what I wanna see. That's where all of this began. Do you remember in episode a 150? Do you remember what we read from Aecom? Do you see that we are just getting started? Where Aecom told us, this is the group that constructed the 2017 restoration project on Big Ben in London. This group told us that they weren't even documenting the restoration projects in the nineteen fifties and nineteen eighties. So why in the world would a historian ever think to challenge us at this point? They wouldn't. In fact, it's the complete opposite. Any supposed historian, they will know once we are done here that the mainstream will never provide the load bearing calculations from the eighteen nineties for any structure structure that was built from the old world. We all know this where AECOM, word for word on their website, states that without detailed records, their engineers had to rely on information sourced from old photographs and newspaper articles of the previous restoration works undertaken in the nineteen fifties and nineteen eighties. This was a challenge they said. Limited documentation of previous repairs right on their website. They couldn't even document restoration projects, let alone the entire blueprints from the original construction, the finance records, every piece of stone, every iron beam, every delivery in the nineteenth century, where every delivery, just like we've said, in the nineteenth century required a signed ledger or railway manifest. If they built these buildings, there would be thousands of pages of shipping records. None exist, and we're gonna get them to admit it. The blueprints were just the beginning because if they're gone, then so are the engineers' signatures, the insurance records, the inspection reports, the payment receipts, the contracts with the material suppliers, the entire paper trail of human labor, all of it is erased. And if the paper trail doesn't exist today, which I do not believe it does, But we're gonna be proving it soon. If it doesn't exist, then this can only mean one thing. The builders that they tell us about, they didn't construct anything. I say good luck to them because the end of the mainstream history is coming once and for all. I'm gonna be leaving no stone unturned. Thinking logically, as all of us are now, we know that the truth is coming. We can feel it. And we're just getting started. Because we have just received an email from the collections department at the Albany Institute of History and Art regarding the Cathedral Of All Saints, Albany, New York. And what they replied to me is going to shock the world. Next Saturday, 04:30PM eastern time on YouTube and Rumble. Get ready because the mainstream history, it is all done. We have been in contact with a massive amount of historical record holders. The people keeping the records for these old world palaces all over the world, and what they told us is going to shock the world. I'm gonna begin to show you all of them starting today, and it's something that I believe will never be unseen. The more that we expose here, the more it will confirm that these structures in every single country, they don't belong in our current timeline. The stories that we've all been told about them, they're not the truth. Today is the beginning of the end of the mainstream narrative. I'm about to dialogue each and every interaction that we have with these institutions, these record holders, the people that should easily be able to provide us with the documentation, the blueprints that verify that what we're all being told in the mainstream history is actually true. What you're about to see is going to be incredible. Here we go. We emailed the Albany Institute of History and Art, asking them to confirm whether their collection includes the original architectural blueprints and structural drawings for the Cathedral of All Saints located in Albany, New York. This is clearly something that we don't just construct in our towns today. It's a palace in New York that we are being told was supposedly thrown together in just three and a half years from 1884 to 1888 without a power tool. So I asked them for the blueprints because we all know that this is the receipt to the building. It's the proof that their story, that they're all trying to tell us, is actually the truth. And this is not thousands of years ago. This is 1884. The blueprints should be available, especially since it's one of the most impressive structures in the entire world. Built during a time period of horses and wagons, dirt roads, suffering in the winters. And what they replied blew my mind and proved that we have been correct all along. The Albany Institute of History and Art replied saying that they looked through the folders but didn't see any blueprints. They don't have the receipts to the building. To their story, a palace structure with no blueprints. They're telling us that they didn't see anything relating to mechanicals. They also say that none of the records from this building have been digitized. And how is that even possible? We're in 2025. This is the Albany Institute of History and Art. They are literally holding historical records for the palace church in New York, yet they don't have the blueprints. And they haven't even digitized any of the records for us to see, which is basically saying that we just need to have faith in them, that they have the other records there. We promise we have them. You know, that's not working anymore. Telling all of us that they are just oversized. They're too hard to access. Too difficult to pull out and look at. This is a major red flag. These are paper drawings. This is the curator. This individual that supposedly gets paid to do this for their job cannot pull out a piece of paper. It's too big. A piece of paper, I guess, is an obstacle. This is crazy. And then she admits that they don't have a librarian on staff. This means that there's no qualified person managing these records of one of America's most incredible old world cathedrals. The mainstream has been telling us for years that they're in the business of preserving and protecting. Remember, we've had many episodes on this. All of the architectural history, not a single librarian on the staff. What are we reading here? And to close out this email, she says that we don't have the ability to make digital images for you. There is no public record. She says I didn't see any blueprints or anything related to mechanicals. Exactly what we suggested from episode a 150, episode 151, and episode 152. These episodes are in order, and they set the stage for today. There are no blueprints. No documentation proving that this thing was actually constructed in our timeline in the eighteen hundreds. Not having the blueprints to this palace in New York is basically them telling us, admitting that their story is a lie. A cathedral of this size and complexity, we all know it should have hundreds of detailed load bearing materials and mechanical drawings. We just laid all of this out in our last episode. Episode a 152. The curator, the record holder at the Albany Institute of History and Art tells all of us that they do not have these. The ultimate proof that we have been correct all along. Where many of the drawings that she says they have are on tissue that has been folded into drawers. Where we all know that tissue drawings, these are not the final blueprints. They're supposedly tracings. These are not actual documentation. These are not load bearing calculations. These are not the measurements. This is not evidence at all. She's told us that they don't have the real blueprints. She's also told us that they don't have the load bearing calculations. Where are the real blueprints? They don't have them. So where are they? I personally believe that we will never see them. This structure was found in the seventeen or eighteen hundreds. At this point, the evidence is overwhelming that our civilization didn't build it, which is exactly why we don't have the blueprints. And it is time for the world to realize this. And we're just getting started today because how can this lady not digitize it? She can't walk over there and take a picture with her phone? Welcome to episode a 153 of my lunch break. I hope you're all having a great day. And if you're new, welcome. Records. This basically means that it's either not there or she's not allowed to share the information with the public. Off limits. Just like we've seen so many times. This is not a little house. It's not a shed. This is a palace cathedral in New York. How are the records not digitized? How do they not have a librarian on staff? How do they not have the blueprints? Just take picture of these documents with the phone that you're probably emailing me from and send it over to me, saying it's just oversized. There's way too much paper, so I can't. This isn't working anymore. No blueprints to a palace cathedral. This is now exposed forever. Every historian out there, if you're watching, you should be challenging this as well. Don't you wanna teach facts? Again, I wanna say this is a 100% not this individual's fault. She is just the messenger, and she's actually helping us. So let's be clear on that. And every time we do this in the future, these people that reply to us are helping us. They're not against us in any way. Anytime they reply, it's actually valuable information for us. But I needed to reply to her email because this is a massive moment. I replied saying that I reviewed the attachment that she provided. All of these items that they supposedly have logged were one of these items that they say they don't even know what it is. Seal number 171002. It's just officially unreadable. I want her to clearly double down so we're all on the same page, and there's no debate. I said, there appeared to be no foundational blueprints, no structural or load calculations, and nothing showing mechanical, electrical, plumbing, or support systems for the Cathedral of All Saints. Everything listed seems to be decorative or artistic elements, which include window tracery, ornamental drawing designs, and on and on. But no actual construction or engineering plans, but things that would actually prove if their story is true. I'm asking her to please confirm whether any true architectural or mechanical blueprints ever existed for this cathedral. I'm not sure how much clearer I could get, but I want an answer either way. And after her reply, there will never be another person that ever trust the history that we've all been told ever again. This is the Albany Institute of History and Art that needs to be pointed out over and over. It's not just some random person. I cannot wait show you her response of how the Donkeys Inc. Club got to the site. How did these people do it? I have no idea. Because there's no records. Without anyone apparently ever seeing the Donkeys Inc. Club build these palaces, they didn't even have to create blueprints in the eighteen hundreds apparently. Can you believe what we've been told? That they were able to build palace after palace by just imagining it in their head. Yet they lived in a society that wasn't advanced at all. No logistics, nothing documented, no training, and everybody's suffering in winters. But just building palaces all over the world. Thank you to the Donkeys Inc. Club. You would be in the construction hall of fame if it was up to me. Thank you to all of our badge members, all of our Patreons, every single subscriber. You are all awesome in helping grow this channel to brand new people every single day. We are on YouTube. We're on Rumble x, Instagram, TikTok, and Spotify. If you're looking for even more content from us, she replied saying that this is the entirety of the collection. Saying that she doesn't know where the blueprints are. And there it is. Official confirmation, the end of the mainstream narrative forever. It's done. You cannot tell a story and not back it up with the blueprints. Again, this is not thousands of years ago. This is 1884 to 1880 supposedly. The blueprints would be here. They would be registered. They would be available, and they are not. We now have confirmation that these stories are not the truth. They're lies. They have zero evidence proving that Robert w Gibson actually built this cathedral, the Cathedral Of All Saints in Albany, New York. We are living in a moment in time. You and me, all of us. Right now, a time of exposure, the truth is coming through right now as we speak that they do not know where the blueprints are. An admission from the institution that's responsible for preserving the record of construction that they don't have the official blueprints. This is incredible that they don't have the official blueprints and they never did because our civilization, they didn't build this building. Not in the eighteen hundreds and that's it. They're not securing any archives. They're not protecting any sites. They're lying. And this is a 100% evidence And this was difficult to even reach this individual. Originally, we talked to somebody else that let us here, that they told us that would be able to best assist me in my request. Now, this individual on record has officially documented twice that they didn't see any blueprints in their archives, and they don't know where the blueprints even are. And saying that maybe the cathedral could check on this. The blueprints are supposed to be in the Albany Institute of History and Art. That's where they're supposed to be. They're supposed to be documented, registered, stored, and preserved. Remember, from episode a 152, these records would have needed to be registered. The blueprints, the load bearing calculations to show the city that the cathedral was safe. It was mandatory by this time. Without these documents, this is what we're being told. Historians can only assume that the builder had the technical ability. They cannot prove it. They don't have any evidence. It's all done. The game is now over for them. And we all know that this is just the beginning for us. I never thought this would lead to this. I actually wanted to see the blueprints. I really wanted to see the tunnel diagrams below the floors connecting to all the other old world structures in the area. I was gonna go there and I was gonna ask to go in the tunnels based on the blueprints and the drawing designs. I wanted to see how they were all connected in the area and how they accounted for that. I wanted to see the drawings and how incredible these people were in the eighteen hundreds. But of course, we know that that didn't happen. We are living in a world that is filled with deception, lies, stories that aren't true, structures that were constructed before this timeline that we're currently living in. If we just walked into a modern city hall today in the basic box style from the nineteen nineties, They're gonna hand you the blueprints right now. There's gonna be no hesitation. They've got them. But when we ask for the plans to a palace from just 1888, they don't know where these blueprints are. They have no idea. This means that the eighteen hundreds, all these stories, they cannot be trusted anymore. They need to be verified. And especially nothing before 1800 where they try to tell us all about the 13 hundreds from episode a 148 where the character named Ali in the car just knocked out this mosque from 1396 to 1399 with 20 domes in the rest. There is no proof that actually ever happened. We know that. The story that they tell us is pretend. It's make believe. It's stories for adults. There are no blueprints from a cathedral in New York that was constructed just a hundred and thirty seven years ago. Now I want you all to imagine something. Imagine hearing this exact same answer from other scholarly institutes hundreds more times all over the world from different supposed mainstream historians, librarians, if they have one on staff. In Paris, London, Istanbul, all over The USA, Scotland, Budapest, and the rest. All telling us that they don't know where the blueprints are. Exactly like we saw today. I'm gonna tell you what, it's going to happen. We all know it. And every single time, it's going to get more and more intense, more and more revealing. The evidence is gonna pile up and it's going to show the entire world that we have been correct all along. We don't know where the blueprints are. It's going to be remembered forever. There's no going back. This is not an isolated incident. This is step one of a worldwide audit. From this point forward, every country, every archive that we contact, they will all get the exact same question. Where are the blueprints to the palace? And I will show you the replies right here on this channel one by one, not having the records to our most incredible structures all over the world. This is such a terrible mistake by the narrator. Because if the original records are gone, not in our possession, then all of our textbooks, the stories, our timeline that our supposed knowledge is built on, even our understanding of progress, it's all based on made up stories. This isn't just about the Cathedral Of All Saints, and I think we all know that deep down. This isn't just me and my car wondering anymore exactly how this channel started. It is now thousands of us. It's all of us. We are all on this mission together now. A massive community that has grown over the years. A huge team here. Looking for factual evidence, looking for the truth. And if anybody out there is watching, if you can find an official blueprint that shows the details of one of these old world palaces or if you can't and they admit it, go ahead and send it to me and I'll show it to everybody right here in an episode, mylunchbreak1@gmail.com. I don't reply, but my team will definitely look at it. Every episode to this point built to this moment. And as I always say, and we all know this, we are just getting started because next Saturday, 04:30PM eastern time, we got a reply from the parliamentary archives. Big Ben, the Elizabeth Clock Tower, London, England. This is the episode, episode a 154, that I've been waiting to share with you for so long. We're in episode a 150. We saw that this was constructed as part of a parliament project. And I'm gonna tell you what, their reply is shocking.
Saved - June 12, 2026 at 10:52 PM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

"Jews have been thrown out of every nation that ever took them in. Every single nation." https://t.co/gwLZIBuncT

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the 1200s, England “threw out all its Jews.” In the 1300s, France “threw out all its Jews.” In the 1400s, Spain “threw out all its Jews.” Central Europe, Eastern Europe, and Russia throughout the rest of the millennium “threw out its Jews,” “engaged in pogroms,” and “of course” the Holocaust. These anti-Jewish actions all took place before the state of Israel even existed, so the speaker argues it cannot be “all about Israel” because it happened “before Israel happened.” The speaker says it is a “continuation of the anti-Jewish sentiment,” and adds that protesters at a synagogue in New York would, “if they could,” “throw out all the Jews from New York City.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: England in the 1200s threw out all its Jews. France in the 1300s threw out all its Jews. Spain in the 1400s threw out all its Jews. Central Europe, Eastern Europe, and Russia throughout the rest of the millennium threw out its Jews, engaged in pogroms and, of course, the Holocaust. All of those anti-Jewish actions took place before the state of Israel even existed. So don't tell me this is all about Israel. Right. Because it happened before Israel happened. Great point. It's a continuation of the anti-Jewish sentiment. These people protesting at that synagogue in New York, if they could, they would throw out all the Jews from New York City. Speaker 1: Oh, fantastic point. Yeah, good history lesson to keep in mind.
Saved - May 18, 2026 at 11:47 AM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Satanism = Saturnism 🪐 https://t.co/2fmAb82rFc

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion claims everything about government, politics, and events is tied to Saturn and that “astrotheology” reflects an ancient doctrine correlating to Saturn. It says Saturn’s North Pole is a hexagon and links a cube to three-dimensional physical things, describing a cube as having six sides. Saturn is described as the god of time and the god of physical matters. A claim is made that “Satanism is Saturnism.” It states that Satanists worship the goat, that the god is a symbol of Saturn because Saturn is enthroned in Capricorn whose emblem is a goat, and it references appearances associated with “Beyonce, Lady Gaga, Baroness, Philippine, Derochile.” The transcript calls this the “magic square of Saturn six six six” and says it is the most obvious symbol of freemasonry. Another claim says there is a “Saturn cult” everywhere, citing the ring and even “the tick on Nike shoes,” described as “the is Google Chrome,” and saying symbols and “two notes” are everywhere because they “worship it” to “maintain the false reality.” The black cube is said to represent the prison where people reside, with Saturn equated to Satan. The transcript says the elites’ secret goal is to put most of the population inside that cube: traumatic birth in a hospital, school for twelve years, then working and plugging into the system in a lifetime cycle of consuming, working, and repeating until death. It claims they want people worshiping an external god so they never look within, and that they want attachment, hatred, and heavy energies so energy stays stuck in the lowest centers of survival. It further claims people possess an inner sun within—“your heart”—which can balance Saturn and other planetary forces. Time and work are described as structures of control: phone, laptop, and TV are called “a cube of Saturn.” The transcript says Saturn is the god of time (Kronos), and it connects “chronological” to Kronos. It claims people are trained to wake, report, and meet deadlines, and interprets alarms and deadlines as offerings. “Nine to five” is described as a ceremony, and going to work as a sacrifice while someone “harvest[s] your time.” It says staring at a phone feeds a Saturn cube because cubes “block you into three dimensions.” It says the cube is the structure that gives rise to physical matter and that everything in the three-dimensional world has six sides (up, down, left, right, back, forward). The transcript describes the Saturn logo as a cross and a crescent, stating the cross symbolizes Earth and the crescent symbolizes the moon. It interprets other planetary symbols (Jupiter, Mars) similarly, then claims the Saturn logo shows Earth over mind when it should show mind over earth, and says the Saturn logo represents a low state of consciousness where the physical body dominates the mind, producing a slave-like unconscious state where people do not control their reality.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everything is about Saturn. So when you understand what astrotheology has to do with government and politics and how things play out, you'll understand that this has been a set up for thousands of years. The doctrine is ancient. It all correlates to Saturn. The North Pole of Saturn is a hexagon. A cube is six sides. A cube represents the three-dimensional plane, physical things. What is Saturn? The god of time, which is the god of what? Physical. Speaker 1: Satanism is Saturnism. Satanists worship the goat. The god himself is a symbol of Saturn because this planet is enthroned in Capricorn whose emblem is a goat. And you see them on Beyonce, Lady Gaga, Baroness, Philippine, Derochile. This is called the magic square of Saturn six six six. This is the single of Saturn, the most obvious symbol of freemasonry. Speaker 2: Everywhere, it's a it's a Saturn cult. You'll see the ring, even the tick on Nike shoes. That's the is Google Chrome. Yeah. It's it's two notes everywhere because they worship it because it's keeping it's maintaining the false reality of it. Speaker 3: In other words, you're in a prison. The black cube represents the prison that you reside in, and that thing is what Saturn represents, which is Satan. Speaker 4: The secret goal of the elites is to place the majority of the population inside that cube. You start with a traumatic birth in a hospital, then you attend school for twelve years, and then you go on for more just to work a job and plug into the system. It's a lifetime cycle of consuming, working, and repeating until death. They want you worshiping an external god so you never look within because they don't want you to realize that you have an inner sun within you, which is your heart, which can not only balance Saturn, but all of the other planetary forces as well. They want your heart full of attachment and hatred and heavy energies, so your energy may not flow and stay stuck in the lowest centers of survival. Speaker 5: Fella, everything black and rectangular around you right now. Your phone, your laptop, your TV. You know what that is? A cube of Saturn, Chris. Saturn is the god of time. Kronos. That's literally where the word chronological comes from. They've looked at Speaker 2: my decades on the force. Wake up at this time. Precinct at this time. File by this deadline. Every minute structured around time I didn't own. I call it discipline. Wasn't discipline. Speaker 5: It was tribute, fellow. Every alarm, every deadline, every minute, you feel guilty for not grinding. That's an offering. Your time is the currency. The nine to five is the ceremony. So going to work is like a sacrifice? Speaker 2: You sit in a cube for eight hours while someone harvest your time. They put career on the box so you climb in yourself. Speaker 5: For every time I stare at my phone, I'm literally feeding a Saturn cube? Why cubes specifically? Because a cube blocks you into three dimensions. Fella, length, width, height. That's the entire reality they want you to believe exists. Speaker 2: Saturn has been in your face this whole time. In Mecca, have the black cube. Jews wear the black cube. Trump Tower, Manha, Denmark, Australia. The cube is the structure that gives rise to physical matter. Everything within this three-dimensional world has six sides. Up, down, left, right, back, and forward. Logo of Saturn is made of a cross and a crescent. The cross is the symbol of Earth, and the crescent is the symbol of the moon. Jupiter is a crescent, the moon, and across the Earth. Mars is the circle of the sun and a cross for the Earth. The sun is the soul, the moon represents the mind, and the Earth represents the physical body. The Saturn logo is showing you Earth over mind when it should be mind over earth, mind over matter, because the mind holds power over the physical body. The Saturn logo represents a low state of consciousness where someone's mind is being dominated by their physical body, where they lack self control and conscious control over their thoughts and actions, and they're living in an unconscious state. That's exactly the state of consciousness of a slave. They want your mind to be dominated by the physical world so you never control your reality.
Saved - May 8, 2026 at 10:58 PM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

THE BAAL CYCLE: Irrefutable proof that a highly-advanced civilization lived in this world before us, was BURIED, and ERASED from our historical timeline. [🎥: @mylunchbreak_]

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a detailed, continuing exploration of ancient sites, focusing on the Hypogeum in Paola, Malta. He notes the Hypogeum is an enormous subterranean structure excavated about four thousand five hundred and twenty-four years ago, lifting huge blocks of limestone. It was discovered in 1902 during construction, with 7,000 elongated skulls found, most destroyed, and remaining ones hidden from the public. He points out that some underground chambers appear cut to imitate the architecture of above-ground megalithic temples, including false bays and windows, underground windows, and a ceiling feature described as “one ring of carved stone overhanging the one below” to imitate a roof. He questions whether the structure was originally above ground and buried during a cataclysmic event that killed the inhabitants, arguing that the mainstream view as a burial site does not fit the evidence of immediate death or entrapment. He asserts a global pattern of civilizations being buried or hidden beneath the surface after massive events, citing that the original structure could have melted or been altered, and presents this as part of a broader claim that the old world remains buried beneath modern layers. He then shifts to Italy, describing the Hypogeum of the Valumnus family, uncovered in 1840 near a road excavation, with about 200 tombs and a site thought to date to the second and third centuries BC. It features ten rooms and two winged demon guardians at the entrance. He mentions urns painted with scenes, including griffins, and ties this to Tartarian theories, suggesting mythic beings and Greek myth figures were real in the past. He shows photos showing changes over time, including items removed from rooms and walls, implying that discoveries have been altered or stripped as roads and modern interventions occurred. He argues that the underground world contains a hidden history yet to be revealed and laments the loss of artifacts. Speaker 0 then turns to Syria, continuing the Hypogeum topic with the Hypogeum of Yarhei, an underground tomb timeline misrepresented as January 2007/2009, and claims it was originally located in Palmyra’s Valley of the Tombs before being excavated and restored, moved to Damascus in 1935, and later placed in a national museum. He recounts an AI correction episode about the date of discovery (1933) and the move (1935), insisting that the true timeline is being obscured. He surveys Palmyra today, noting extensive destruction of a vast old-world temple complex, including the Temple of Baal, the Temple of Dagon, and a monumental arch. He references Gertrude Bell’s 1900 description of Palmyra’s grandeur and argues that many columns, temples, and palaces remain under the surface or were destroyed to erase the past. He highlights the Temple of Baal as a massive site, comparing its size to the Great Pyramid of Giza, and claims additional ancient sites nearby—such as a castle on a cliff—were melted and turned to sand. Speaker 0 condemns reconstruction narratives as inadequate and asserts ongoing efforts to hide evidence of an advanced, previously unknown civilization. He mentions the destruction of temples in 2015 (Temple of Baal Shemin and related arches) and argues that such acts are designed to erase true history. He concludes by emphasizing that thousands of tablets from Palmyra were found in 1929, including the Baal Cycle and other texts, and suggests that what is presented publicly is incomplete or deceptive. He ends by urging viewers to remember the pottery and anticipating more discoveries, noting the broader implication that the past is far more complex and veiled than commonly acknowledged.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Hypogeum is an enormous subterranean structure excavated four thousand five hundred and twenty four years ago, lifting huge blocks of limestone. All thanks to this group yet again for their input. And I thought that we had covered most of this topic, but I kept digging, and we are not even close. Today, we are going back for more. For anyone new, we are speaking about the Hypogeum located in Malta, more specifically, in the town of Paola, where they found this underground temple in nineteen o two, discovering it while constructing houses, blocking the public, all of us, from the area for nearly a decade where they found 7,000 elongated skulls, destroying most of them, and then hiding the remaining ones from the public. And we have shown all of this. Now today, I wanted to go back because there are things that blew my mind. One of the most striking characteristics of this location is that some of the chambers appear to have been cut in imitation of the architecture of the above ground megalithic temples. Doing all of this underground. Are you seeing what this means? I'll keep going. Where they found false bays and windows. Underground Windows. Can you see very clearly now? This temple is underground now, but I don't believe that it always was. Most importantly, the ceiling with one ring of carved stone overhanging the one below to supposedly imitate a roof. Imitating a roof? Or was this just a roof? Was this a temple just on the ground level when it was constructed with the event that we've talked about so many times, burying it, and in doing so, killing the 7,000 plus individuals inside? Is the previous civilization just like we found here buried under our feet right now? All over the world, and we have yet to find it. And to prove our point here, the mainstream thinks this was some sort of burial ritual, saying that it appears that the bodies were probably left exposed until the flesh had decomposed and fallen off. When in reality, these individuals were most likely killed on the spot from the event that took place. And if there were any that didn't die immediately, they would have been trapped underground. Individuals were not buried separately but piled onto each other. This is all according to our friends right up here at the top. It makes so much more sense that this was not a burial site at all. It was originally above ground, and they were then trapped under the ground in this event and tossed the deceased into the pile. Remember, this event melted structures all over the world. We have shown so many examples of this. The original structure definitely could have been melted, now leaving it look like it was chiseled, chiseled with an antler like we have shown. We have seen so many times all over the world that the old world is buried below our feet. Something massive happened here 100%. It's undeniable at this point. And like I said, I wanted to go deeper. I wanted to show you even more. So I went back to the hypogeum of the Valumnus family located in Italy. This site includes about 200 tombs. And then finding this one in 1840. And then knowing all about the second and third century BC, they found this one while carrying out excavation works for a new road where it seems like it was used until the first century BC. It seems like it. Unbelievable. Having 10 rooms and two winged demons guarding the entrance. Again, finding all of this while putting in a nice road and a sidewalk for all of us, showing that most people have no idea what is under their feet. We haven't even found it all, and we know this. And it all predates the horses and wagons nonsense. Stone structures structures of winged demons in advanced group underneath our feet. And then it all goes back to dirt roads and sheds. No technology and writing by feather. Or are we not being told the truth? You tell me. Remember, we are in Italy, and I told you we were coming back for a reason. Are you ready? Right here in front of the main entrance sits collection of urns found in the necropolis in other tombs belonging to other families. It seems that they were all painted with various scenes, Some with the griffin. The griffin. Yet again, Tartaria. I don't believe that this griffin was so mythical after all, and I don't think it was here that long ago. With other represent ations of Greek mythology. Mythology. Not so mythical after all in my opinion. And found because we were going to build a road. Oh, and what happened to that guy's head? Maybe there was a random earthquake eight hundred years ago that just wanted his head and left everything else just perfectly fine. Now check this picture out. This was found making a road. I just cannot even imagine what else we haven't seen yet or has been removed from us already. This is incredible. Our history is missing so much. The reset clearly took place within the last few hundred years, throwing us right back into the horse and wagon era, removing all technology, removing all the history, all the knowledge about this place that we all live. I've seen enough at this point where I believe that there were angels here as well as demons, and I have no idea if they're really gone. Again, this place was found in 1840. This is the timeline that we have talked about so many times. Our current civilization, all of us starting back in the eighteen hundreds. We have episode ten and thirty eight that show everything that's been given back to us within these last few hundred years. Who lived here before we all got here? It's crazy to look at the depictions of the past. If they didn't put it all in stone, we would have no idea what used to be here because we're definitely not told about these things, about demons or angels being involved with humans. And we all know that that story was removed from the book. The narrative that demons and angels were involved with the humans. This narrative is folklore supposedly. Yet, we see the angels and we see the demons intertwined into the buildings right into the stone, into the stories that are being depicted on these buildings within the stone art in every single continent. Clearly, this was the civilization that constructed the old world palaces. This one on the bottom right looks like he has a tool in his hand, having huge hands for being so small. Same with the other one on the left. But it's all just art, of course. We get a good look at the whole room right here and see where they found these. It's right when you walk in, and I wouldn't be shocked that they are guarding something behind that wall. And let's be honest, we all know that we're not seeing everything that was originally down there before they found it. Things were removed. We all know this now. Should I prove it? Well, right here, we can see that there were items in here, and this is today. Could you even imagine a hundred years ago, this place that we all live was probably a free for all. So today, we get this photo. The chains are We have a bunch of items here all over the floor. Then flipping to this photo, it's all gone. Even the thing on the wall is changed. The other one is just removed. So we know that whatever was down here in 1839, a year before they found it, unfortunately, it is not here anymore. And let's just be honest. It's shocking that they left anything at all. If they would've just taken all of these statues out, we probably wouldn't suspect a thing. All found underground while making a road in Italy. Absolutely incredible stuff. And look where this place is located. If you were just driving past, you would have no idea that this is in there. Look at this. It honestly looks like they want it to be hidden. It's so weird. If you were walking past this place, never done any research, you would have no clue that this is inside. It's crazy. Just knowing that, could you imagine what is underneath all these people's houses or at least what was? Surely, there are tunnels. And I bet people go to this musical academy today and have no clue that this is right next to them. We have a bar right here to the right, and I bet none of them know what's inside the building to the left. An incredible operation worldwide to suppress our true history. I'm glad thousands of us know about this place now. Let's go to Syria. Staying with the Hypogeum topic because this one is just insane. The Hypogeum Of Yarhei, where the underground tomb was supposedly built in January, not 01/2007 and 01/2009. Can you believe this nonsense? I need everybody to understand that they are not pinning down the date of January. It's not happening. And they go on to say that this under underground tomb was originally located in the Palmyra's Valley Of The Tombs before being excavated and restored, destroyed. The underground tomb was then moved to Damascus in 1935 and was then moved again and placed in its national museum. Can you even imagine what we are not being shown? This is insane. Moving things around in 1935 and later placing it somewhere else. And you can see here with the AI chat GPT that they are influencing If you didn't know the truth, they are trying to change this narrative. I asked when it was found, and the AI says it was found in 1983. So I replied that I thought it was moved to Damascus in 1935, like we were told. The AI replies, you're correct. It was indeed moved to Damascus in 1935. Here's the correct information for you. Can you believe this? Overriding the truth. Why are they so against telling us the truth over and over, hiding that they moved it? Can you believe that we have to correct the AI? Very clearly, a human entered that information in there about this story. So I said, what year was it found? Because it does not wanna answer this question. Finally giving us the answer after backing it into a corner and pulling its teeth. It was found in 1933, and they did not wanna tell us this. Because once you know that it was found in 1933, you know that they moved it in 1935 to Damascus just two years later. So finding this and then moving it two years later. So what else did they find in Palmyra? What was wrong with the first location? Why did it need to be moved so fast? A 150 miles away. Remember, this thing was just fine for centuries. This is according to them, their narrative. So what I wanna know is why did they need to move it? The decision to move it to Damascus in 1935 was driven by the need to protect and preserve it. Can you believe this? So we are clearly not going to be told the truth here. The carvings were vulnerable due to the exposure of the elements, the temperature fluctuations, a bunch of lies since they just told us that this thing was there from the year 01/2008. On the dot, moving it to Damascus in 1935, made it more accessible to scholars, historians, and archaeologists. Oh, the poor archaeologists. They can't get in their car and go see the historic site, so they just needed it moved closer to their apartment. It's embarrassing. This narrative is a joke, and this statue right here in the middle, he also got his head chopped off. Now that we know they are hiding something massive about this, now I'm going to go back to the original site and investigate what is going on there in Palmyra, Syria because we know that something is off now. Alright. This is the site today. Palmyra, Syria, you are now being exposed to the world. Let's have some fun. Palmyra, meaning the city of palm trees. No palm trees. But I do see a massive palace that has been completely destroyed. A palace from the old world. 100%. And what is this? Eight years ago, we get an article that this group right here is destroying the old world, destroying the Venice of the sands piece by piece. Will this organization erase the memory of the extraordinary history? In 1900, a British traveler, Gertrude Bell wrote, I wonder if the world presents a more singular landscape. It is a mass of columns ranged into long avenues, grouped into temples, lying broken in the sand. Beyond them is the immense Temple Of Baal. More destroyed heads right here. Every single one of them are destroyed. Clearly, we have located a site that is from the old world and was extremely important to a civilization that was here. To give this a little context for anyone new to this research, within the Old Testament, Baal was worshiped by the Israel Worshipping Baal was seen as a major threat to the worship of Yahweh, the god of Israel. This text gets really deep. I won't be reading it all, but you can see a lot of it. The worship of Baal is often associated with moral corruption. The biblical authors depict Baal worship as leading the Israelites into practices that are contrary to the laws and moral expectations set by Yahweh, including rituals of these two things. With Jeremiah nineteen five stating that the Israelites are condemned for building high places to ball and burning this as offerings. Now let's get back to this location. What was going on here? What was going on in Syria before we all got here? What was going on at the Temple Of Baal? A photo from 2009. Again, all of the faces removed over and over everywhere in the world. In the background here, we have a structure that has been completely melted in my opinion. So knowing what we know about this location now, let's go further. The temple was built on understand what that means? A tell is an archaeological term referring to a mound or hill that forms from centuries of human settlement over time as people build and rebuild in the same area, each new layer of construction builds on top of the old. When a temple is built on a tell, it means that the temple is constructed on top of this layered mound of the past civilizations. Can you even believe what we just read? The Temple Of Baal is constructed on top of a previous civilization's work, a tell. There is 100% more beneath this temple, and we now know that. This temple that we just saw was most likely not used for positive things. Was then converted into a Christian church in November. They just couldn't help it. They had to pick the place that had crazy things going on, including sacrifices and rituals. Couldn't they have picked a different place? No. They couldn't. The nineteen twenties comes around, and they cleared the temple grounds of all of its post classical elements. They destroyed it. Clearly, something happened here in this location. Advanced technology 100%. Advanced construction. And I have no idea whether this previous civilization that was here was a great bunch. I don't know if they were great beings with great morals, but what I do know is that we are not being told the truth about them. And we also know that they could easily construct palaces, and it was not with a hammer and chisel, and they were not riding around on horses. The previous civilization had all of the technology that we see today and so much more. We are being given some of this technology back slowly, and we know this now. Now I'm gonna take this to Google Earth and show you this area. Look at all these columns All the way down this road, we get the amphitheater, hammers and chisels, of course, donkey riding cowboys of the past. No. It's like an old world city here. They have palaces all over the place, like some sort of resort or something. And they have a stage where who knows what took place right here. Then, well, just based on what we read, I think we kinda know. Then we have another destroyed structure here. This place is completely destroyed. Stone all over the place. Again, look at this road. The whole thing is filled with columns. Did any one of us learn about this place in our history classes? No? Why not? I think we all know why. Spinning the camera around so we can see it. Look at this with arches and everything. More columns over here. Another palace in the background. And then, of course, the Temple Of Baal. Remember, we know that there are structures from the past right underneath this place as well. Keep that in mind. Look at the size of this temple. It's massive. Measuring out to 434,893 square feet, its perimeter is a half mile. Now I'm gonna put that into perspective and measure the Great Pyramid Of Giza, the biggest one. It's basically the exact same size. The Pyramid in Giza has a slightly longer perimeter of point five six miles. This Temple Of Baal was massive. This is crazy. This site is huge. Just random columns all over the place. Look at this picture showing that there was so much more. And then we see the Statue Of Liberty right on the site. Now when we go back and see that they removed this from this location in Syria and moved it to Damascus in 1935, we can see that this was most likely happening over and over and over in the early nineteen hundreds, removing so many things that we don't get to see today. Just like we were told when the nineteen twenties hit, they cleared the temple grounds of its elements, taking everything of significance from this site and hiding it from all of us 100%. This is so clear now. This research shows that we are missing so much of the true story. Massive stone structures, hundreds of columns, arches towering over us while we walk through. We all got reset. Back to donkeys and wagons. Reset from stone palaces to wooden huts. No lights and freezing in the winters. Going to the bathroom in your backyard. The further that we go into this research, the more we have to ask, where are we, and what are we not being told? Who is controlling this ridiculous narrative that we're all taught since day one and why? The further that we go, the more we advance our knowledge, we see patterns, we see the flaws clearer and clearer. And once we all know the truth, we will never go back. The Temple Of Baal, located in Syria, is so much more than just crumbled stone. In my opinion, it is a haunting reminder that the previous civilization had a very dark side. We showed the Temple Of Baal, but did you know that right next to this site in Syria, we have a castle from the old world located up on top of a cliff where we all know just by looking at this and all of the research that we've done to this point, we know that this thing is so much bigger and has been completely melted and turned into sand. We know that they told us that the Temple Of Baal that is right here, right next to this castle, where I believe they were both constructed by the same group during the exact same period. We were told that the Temple Of Baal was found in thirty two AD. Thirty two AD. Not '31, not '33, but pinning it down to thirty two AD. With a side note that we are correct yet again. It is inaccessible today due to being in a war zone. War zones. These zones, in my opinion, are to block the public from seeing what was there or what still is. When the main entrance has been destroyed, a great way to destroy the true history, to just blow it up and chalk it up to a war. So thirty two AD, this one is constructed two thousand years ago. Then they wait, like, one thousand two hundred years to build a castle. This is what we are being told right next to each other, one thousand two hundred years apart. I think this is very obvious that these structures were constructed during the exact same time period. This entire location was clearly an old world city, a palace city, and I don't believe it was thousands of years ago. I believe it was so much closer to our timeline than what we are being told and has been mostly destroyed, making it look older than it is with our friends over here at this group interested in our favorite locations yet again, stating that this one is one of the most important cultural centers of the ancient world, the old world, the previous civilization. This is the Tadmer Castle and was placed on the list of world heritage sites in danger in 2013 due to an ongoing Syrian civil war. The castle was captured by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant in 2015, then recaptured in 2016. Now remember, it was supposedly fine for centuries until our timeline comes around and it starts being captured every year and then put into danger war zones. What kind of season does this sound like to you? Making the case stronger and stronger. Making it sound like a little season to me with the book of life on the way. It's all very interesting. With retreating ISIS fighters blowing up parts of the castle, including the stairway, leading to the entrance causing extensive damage all right in front of our faces. Yet, I would bet even some of our greatest history majors have most likely never even seen this place before. All by design, this location definitely wasn't highlighted in history 01/2001, one 2002, or whatever other number they wanna make up. With a few more captures here in 2016 and again in 2017, Every year, recapturing this place. It's ridiculous. And even more ridiculous is that we are told that this was built by the Mamluks. And why is this ridiculous? Well, because Mamluks translates to one who is owned or down here stating much clearer. Originally, the Mamlux were this word. Again, not going to say that word ever again here since we had a major issue with it in the past. We're gonna leave that word alone, but you can see it right here. So let's read this again. The Old World Palace Castle was built one thousand two hundred years later by a bunch of laves with an s at the front. These stories are insane. To believe that this kind of group can construct a palace castle that lasts forever is insane to believe at this point. While they were purchased property, their status was above ordinary. The people that worked for free back in the thirteen hundreds, these are the people that we are told are the master builders of the past. It's incredible. No training necessary. Just going up on that cliff with no power tools in the sand and building a palace castle. Eight hundred years ago, and it just so happens that it's right next to hundreds of columns and a temple the size of the Pyramid Of Giza. All a coincidence, of course. No. So because there's a war going on here, we don't get to drop the guy down on this location and look around. Could you imagine waking up and here's the supermarket with your sports club over here and a hair salon? Then you have temples, castles, and the Tower Of Elable, all right outside your window in the morning, all dating back 2,000 years. Thanks to the experts. We know this now. Well, no. We don't. When we all show up and the tower was demolished using explosives in 2015, this is a clear attack on the true history to hide what really happened here where we all live, blocking sites off from us, calling it a war, and then bombing these places. It happens over and over. In this shot, we also see the Damascus Gate. This is Palmyra. So I'm gonna guess that this was renamed since Damascus is a 134 miles away. And I could honestly look at this picture all day. I believe this picture proves that the history that we were all given is a complete lie. It proves that something happened here. An extremely advanced group was here and is now gone and is 100% being hidden from all of us, telling us that we are the most advanced group to ever be here. This lie is no longer acceptable. Clearly, there's been a civilization, and most likely civilizations, that have been here with incredible technology, and their construction proves this. It's left here all over the place for all of us to see, which is exactly why they have to blow it all up because it takes the mainstream narrative, and it rips it right in half. It completely destroys story time. For the mainstream lovers, we are exposing it all and proving that this place that we all live is so much more than what we are told. Obviously, I had to come back to this location. It's extremely significant to our research and needed to be explored further. Having columns destroyed all over the place, telling us that this is from 2,000 years ago, a site that none of us can go and see today. Regardless of which religion the historical sites worshiped or still do, I believe that they are very important to understanding the true past of this place that we all live and should not be destroyed today just because we don't agree what they were used for. This being said, there are some groups here today that may be planted to destroy the true history, and they might not agree with what I just stated. When this group, having a history of destroying ancient structures stating that they would destroy any artifacts that they didn't agree with religiously and proceeded to detonate a large quantity of explosives inside the Temple Of Baal Shemin, completely destroying the building in 2015. And I wanna be very clear. This is a separate temple than the Temple Of Baal that we previously covered, where the temple was also destroyed. Not only did they destroy both of these temples, they also destroyed the monumental arch. The same exact arch that I said I could look at all day because it gives it all away. That arch is gone. When it was officially destroyed in 2015, destroying structures and sites all over the world. Sites that easily prove that something is off about what we've all been told. And they say they have plans to rebuild it. Right. Yeah. You're not rebuilding that. We all know that's not gonna happen. Speaker 1: Too many beautiful cities. I've seen those cities. They're so beautiful and that, you know, for I don't know how you can ever rebuild them the way they were. It's not possible. I don't know how you can ever rebuild them the way they were. It's not possible. Speaker 0: When this is our civilization's replica, at this point, we shouldn't even embarrass ourselves. Saying we're gonna rebuild things from the old world, it actually exposes the fact that we can't do it or it takes so much longer. It exposes the truth. Blowing this site up using dynamite. And in 2016, very little of the arch remained standing. You are always free to think whatever you'd like. As always, I am simply speaking based on everything that we have seen throughout so many hours of research here. Now I do believe that this was most likely the site where Ball was located. I also don't believe that this took place thousands of years ago. Like I've stated, I believe that this is why there is an obvious attempt even to this day to destroy it all. To prove my point, why didn't anybody go in there and destroy this place in 1650? Why not 1420? The year January. Well, it's because, of course, in my opinion, those years are not real, at least the way that we think about them. I believe the actual year is fabricated. I don't believe that this temple was erected two thousand years ago. There was an advanced civilization here that constructed these things within the last few hundred years, and all of their work is here for us to see. And I do not believe that these so called myths are so mythical after all. I think this place that we all live today is much different than we all understand, where we are all coming together and exposing the lies, showing the massive flaw in the stories. We are told that they are myths and then see massive temples all over the place that are being destroyed over and over. Proof that what we're being told is a lie. Proof that a group of people were here that understood construction. Why hide a place from all of us if it's all just a myth? In mythological text, dwelling is described as a magnificent palace with silver and gold guarded like a fortress. All a myth, of course. Not anymore. The Temple Of Baal was one of the most important temples in the ancient Near East and served as a focal point for religious ceremonies. Religious ceremonies, including just like we talked about in episode 97. All a myth, of course, with palaces all over the place and the whole thing blown up right in front of our faces. All a myth with text frequently describing this taking place, all dedicated to this figure. Not only do we see this figure in text from modern day Syria, we see it written on clay tablets. We also see it in the Bible, the Old Testament, mentioning ball worship multiple times with references to this, with their locations right here. All just a myth, of course. Oh, wait. What is this? Archaeological excavations at ancient ball worship sites such as Palmyra found remnants that suggest sacrificial activity showing that these so called myths may not be so mythical after all, just like we've seen so many times. Finding bones at the site with multiple texts confirming this activity. Again, you are always free to think whatever you'd like, but I don't believe that these texts are from thousands of years ago. I believe our timeline is a total mess and a complete fabrication of our true history. There are certain groups that still worship certain things today. Do you think that they're just worshiping a mythical creature? You tell me. Now we were told that they were uncovering bones at Palmyra, the exact same location that we have been investigating today. They also mention another location. Before we enter this location, we need to understand that there were texts found in this location. They found the text titled the ball cycle, a collection of texts. The Bal Cycle is composed of several epic poems or narrative fragments. The Bal Cycle provides indirect evidence of the types of rituals and offerings associated with Baal worship. They found all of this right here. They reflect the importance of rituals in ensuring Baal's favor and prosperity of the community. All of this within the text. Rituals included offerings, which were sacrificed to appease ball and secure his blessings. The sacrifices were performed by priests. And then we can go back to the catacombs and see what they have done. Right underneath so many churches, what have they done? What have we just found? Have they been practicing something that worships the opposite side without any of us knowing it using our structures that were originally meant for good. What practice has taken place worldwide? What are we seeing today? Did we just show the cause of the catacombs, a ritualistic intention just like we have shown into geometric patterns, a sacrifice right under the church's floorboards using the priest. We are told that the sacrifices were performed by the priests. This is unbelievable. Just over 200 miles driving from the Temple Of Baal, all located in Syria. We have this location where they found the tablets, the location in which they found the Baal cycle, the story. We are told that this is the location where the world got its first alphabet. And this is all documented, of course. No. With great fires taking place here as well. When they tell us the city seems to have been burnt and the population probably diminished. Probably. Maybe. But we will never know according to the mainstream narrative. Just throwing things in there. It probably was from thirty two AD. Probably. It might have been. Now they tell us that the city seems to have been burnt and the population probably diminished, but I have a feeling that they burned it down recently just like every other city in the world. So going back to this map, we can see that there was something of significance going on here. And a side note really quick, look how you can drop the guy down all over Europe. But once you go further south into Africa and The Middle East, it's just mass amounts of land that are unavailable to our view. Thousands and thousands of miles of land that I'm sure have clues to our past, either sitting on top of or underneath the layer of sand and so much being hidden from us. For instance, look at this. It looks like there's nothing here. Like, all there is is just a bunch of sand. But once you click on it, we have so much going on. Playgrounds and the rest. It's like there's a civilization there that is not what we are shown from the aerial shot. It's very odd. So let's go back to the action. We are now shown five main sites in this city, the fortress, the main palace, the acropolis, another Temple Of Baal, and the Temple Of Dagon, where we all know here that there is so much under our feet that would blow our minds today. When we see that after the chance discovery by local peasants in 1929, they excavated this site, unearthing the palace, which also gave us the tablets and artifacts, the previous civilization. The old world, finding more than 1,000 tablets in 1929, found right off the coast of modern day Syria. Finding these tablets in 1929, It hasn't even been a hundred years yet. Finding the ball cycle. 1,000 tablets. Could you even imagine what they found? Finding the ball cycle, including stories all about ball. Now what other stories are hidden below the surface? What are we not being shown, and what did they really find in 1929? Were any other stories found within those thousand tablets? What do you think? This place that we live is incredible. These are now places that we will all never forget. These are now stories that we will remember forever, taking our research deeper and deeper, finding the truth all over the world, exposing that something massive happened right here where we are today, all happening within the last few hundred years. We're also exposing that the past, the old world stories were being uncovered just ninety five years ago in a location that we were told was mythical, where it doesn't seem so mythical after all. And the truth is gonna be harder and harder to find the longer that we wait. Just like we see with these tablets, the site where the tablets were found has been affected by the conflict, and the exact extent of damage or loss to these specific tablets is less clear. They have removed the truth yet again. We are told that peasants found these stories just ninety five years ago. A thousand tablets is what we're told when we know that there were probably more and removing them from us right away without a doubt, withholding information that would go against the mainstream story, telling us that the initial excavations revealed that they just found some pottery. Do you remember when I told you to remember the pottery? So they tell us they found some pottery, and don't forget the pottery. I believe the pottery is something that they give us so that we don't dig deeper. Don't forget this because I'm gonna show it again in future episodes. Remember the pottery. I no longer believe this to be the case. I think we all know now that they found much more than just some pottery, especially when we know that they found royal palaces where excavations revealed the remains of grand royal palaces, large multistory structures with elaborate decorations and extensive facilities. They found all of this, and they found temples, including the Temple Of Baal, finding high priests' libraries containing a wealth of texts. The high priests' library was particularly important for its collection of religious and mythological texts, including the Baal Cycle, the Legend of Danil, and the death of ball. These are the stories that we are told about, where we all know that there were so many more. All of this found in the nineteen twenties with more libraries located on the Acropolis, with more texts found in these libraries. Could you even imagine the information from the past that was found that we're all not being told about? With access to the physical artifacts, the text, being restricted to ensure their preservation, are we sure that this is the case? Restricting the public, impacting their accessibility to the public. It seems like an incredible excuse to me. And then making sure we all get excited about the pottery. I don't know about you, but I think I'm about done with all the pottery. I wanna see the old world tax, and I hope you all have a great rest of your day. I'll be back very soon with much more. See you.
Saved - May 5, 2026 at 9:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see a small group of funny-hatted religious extremists who constantly hate us and want us wiped off the Earth because their fantasy book tells them so. They control world banking, media, Hollywood and entertainment, education, porn, Big Pharma, politicians, borders, and the military–industrial complex. Start noticing patterns—it matters.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

✡️⚠️ We could all have a good laugh about how such a high percentage of this small group of funny-hatted religious extremists are CONSTANTLY obsessing over how much they hate us, and want us wiped off the Earth because their little fantasy book tells them we're nothing but slave cattle... If it wasn't for the fact that they control the world banking empire, media, Hollywood/music/entertainment industry, educational system, porn industry, Big Pharma, all of our politicians, borders, military industrial complex, etc... You'd better start noticing patterns like your life depends on it. Because it does.

Saved - April 12, 2026 at 2:53 PM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

9 NASA scientists mysteriously died right before the Artemis II mission. I wonder why that would be 🤔 https://t.co/vVPVrlp6LM

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pictured here was an astrophysicist at Caltech. He worked on a NASA supported space telescope project and infrared systems. Now he was shot and killed at his home just two months ago. Then there's Frank Maywald. He was a senior scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab focused on advanced satellite systems, and he died nearly two years ago, but his cause of death has never been made public. Meanwhile, Monica Reza. Monica Reza also reportedly connected to NASA's jet propulsion lab project. She went missing last summer while hiking in California. No trace. It keeps going. There's William McCaslin, a retired air force general. He too is missing. He's a former head of air force research lab and oversaw advanced space and surveillance programs. He's been missing since February. Reports say he once oversaw funding connected to a project that also included Monica Reza. Now there's more to New Mexico. Melissa Cassis Cassis. She is been missing since last summer. She worked at Los Alamos National Lab. She had administrative role but reportedly also had security clearances. Just months earlier that she went missing, so too did Anthony Chavez, also connected to Los Alamos, an engineer. He disappeared during a walk. No signs, no answers. And then finally, there's Nuno Larrero. You remember Nuno Larrero? He was the MIT researcher focused on nuclear fusion and was shot and killed in his Massachusetts home last December. It was
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pictured here was an astrophysicist at Caltech. He worked on a NASA supported space telescope project and infrared systems. Now he was shot and killed at his home just two months ago. Then there's Frank Maywald. He was a senior scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab focused on advanced satellite systems, and he died nearly two years ago, but his cause of death has never been made public. Meanwhile, Monica Reza. Monica Reza also reportedly connected to NASA's jet propulsion lab project. She went missing last summer while hiking in California. No trace. It keeps going. There's William McCaslin, a retired air force general. He too is missing. He's a former head of air force research lab and oversaw advanced space and surveillance programs. He's been missing since February. Reports say he once oversaw funding connected to a project that also included Monica Reza. Now there's more to New Mexico. Melissa Cassis Cassis. She is been missing since last summer. She worked at Los Alamos National Lab. She had administrative role but reportedly also had security clearances. Just months earlier that she went missing, so too did Anthony Chavez, also connected to Los Alamos, an engineer. He disappeared during a walk. No signs, no answers. And then finally, there's Nuno Larrero. You remember Nuno Larrero? He was the MIT researcher focused on nuclear fusion and was shot and killed in his Massachusetts home last December. It was

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

NASA scientists dropping like flies with no records or autopsies to be found. wHeRe aRe aLL tHe wHiStLeBLoWeRs?

@DailyMail - Daily Mail

Mystery surrounds death of NINTH scientist tied to US secrets as disturbing pattern grows https://trib.al/OHlXD5s

Saved - April 9, 2026 at 10:17 PM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

If you want to continue believing in the Science™ version of the universe...DO NOT google "satellite in space" or "rocket in space" 💀 https://t.co/5HPoWxJ31g

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers debate and dispute space and satellite reality, presenting a flat-Earth perspective. Key points raised: - Visuals of satellites and space images are questioned: “Google images of satellites. Do it. Literally that image.” and “They’re just all… not a single one is not. This is the one thing that trips me out.” They claim satellite photos and moon landings are not real images but renders, and express surprise that “the moon landing’s a little weird.” - Space as a concept is rejected: “Ain’t nobody been outside this giant cave that we’re trapped in.” They argue “out of space is not” real, stating “There’s no such thing as out of space,” and claim “the planets are wandering stars.” - Firmament and water: They mention a dome-like firmament with water above it, saying “What are its water over the firmament. It says it in the bottom.” They claim landings occur as if “they’ll straight the firmament and they’ll land in the ocean,” and describe the firmament as something to be scraped or observed from the ground. - Realness of celestial objects: They acknowledge “The sun is real. The sun and the moon is real,” but separate that from space travel or space objects beyond Earth. - Rockets and trajectories: A point is made that rocket paths curve rather than travel straight, and that this curvature is deliberate or indicative of something, with observations that “the path that the rocket follows” is curved in multiple launches. - Satellites and space infrastructure: A recurrent claim is that “no satellites out there,” followed by insistence that “they are hanging Satellites,” suggesting they are not actual orbital objects. - Government and media claims: There is a mention of Eddie Griffin’s podcast “Butt Naked Truth,” implying the government is using fear to suppress discussion, and a belief that “Ain’t nobody been to the moon” or outside the cave. - General skepticism about space programs: The conversation emphasizes distrust of space exploration narratives and promotes the idea that much of what is presented about space, space stations, and satellites is untruth or deception. - Tone and framing: The speakers repeatedly contrast what is seen and what they believe to be true, often using terms like “trips me out,” “no real pictures,” and “there’s no such thing as out of space,” to emphasize their stance. In sum, the discussion centers on a conspiratorial flat-Earth viewpoint, denying the reality of space travel, satellites, and orbital imagery, while affirming the firmament, water above it, and the realness of the sun and moon within a contained Earth-centered model. They also reference media and podcast arguments as supporting evidence of government deception.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Google images of satellites. Do it. Literally that image Yeah. Speaker 1: Be like satellite. Speaker 0: Type in a satellite. Just like type Speaker 1: in satellite. Like, you'll see no The moon landing's a little weird. You'll see no there's all Speaker 0: like, they're just all There's no real pictures? Graphics? They're Yeah, dude. Not a single one is not. This is the one thing that trivia, I'm not gonna lie. They're all just like renders. Why? It's true. Why do you think? This is the one I'm say this is the one thing that trips me out. I've never seen a satellite that was real. I'm saying, why would they why are they selling us on round? Because it's not only just it's not the that's not the only thing they sell me on. They sell you on space as well. That's why you think like that because you're thinking out of space and all those other planets and Are you real? Yeah. You don't you don't think they're real? You don't think sun's real? No. No. Sun is real. The sun and the moon is real. Okay. But out of space is not. Yeah. Because we haven't seen what is it? What are It's water over the firmament. It's water. Over the firmament. It's not Where the ocean man at? We under the firmament under the dome, there's water over the firmament firmament. It says it in the bottom. They're out of spaces. There's no such thing. There's no such thing as out of space. No. That's a whole thing that get get you tricked and why you think the other planets and stuff. The planets are wandering stars. Speaker 2: Eddie Griffin has had a lot to say since the launch of his podcast, the Butt Naked Truth. His main argument would be that the government is trying to scare people from talking. Speaker 1: Ain't nobody been to the moon. Ain't nobody been outside this giant cave that we're trapped in. The fun of it is real. This is why rocket ships take off and start shooting at a angle. Speaker 3: Thing about the path that the rocket follows. Instead of moving in a straight line, the rocket following a curved trajectory. This isn't a mistake. You will see the exact same thing in every other video of a rocket launch. Speaker 1: They'll straight the firmament and they'll land in the ocean. Speaker 4: Behind. Absolutely amazing to describe it to you, but I mean, you can see it, but from the ground, it almost looks as though it almost looks as though a cloud of smoke with its own mind is just shooting through the sky. Speaker 1: It scraped the surface of the firmament. Landed it's only one day, but the landing is, like, a week later. But that's when they show it. All shit happened in one day. There's no satellites out there either, nigga. There's there's no satellites. Speaker 0: No. No. Speaker 1: There's no satellites. They are hanging Satellites.
Saved - April 3, 2026 at 10:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I present @MYLUNCHBREAK_’s claim that photo manipulation and AI have long served deception, erasing true history and forging a fake one. It questions grand architecture—built with methods we’re told aren’t possible—and suggests a highly advanced past civilization may be hidden. It invites viewers to bookmark and discuss whether current explanations truly fit the feats.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Have photo manipulation and A.I. been utilized as tools of deception by the controllers of our world for far longer than we've been told? In this video, @MYLUNCHBREAK_ presents the case that the answer is YES, and more specifically, that these technologies have been used to orchestrate a thorough wiping of our true history, and fabricate an entirely new, FAKE one. Give it a watch, and share your thoughts. Do the stories behind these mindblowing marvels of architecture scattered across our realm—supposedly built by chisels and donkey carriage technology—actually make sense to you given the time periods they were supposedly built? Does "Oh, they just really cared, and had a lot more free time", truly suffice as an explanation for the creation of such masterpieces, which our highest-level architects today can't even come close to replicating? OR... Is a massive piece of our history...a highly-advanced previous civilization perhaps...being intentionally hidden from us? (🔖 BOOKMARK if you don't have time to watch it now) #OldWorld #Tartaria #MillennialKingdom #LittleSeason

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this episode, the speaker describes a forensic photo analysis of late 19th to early 20th century imagery, highlighting a tree line in a photo that appears altered, with the sky removed behind the trees. The analysis purportedly uses algorithms to determine if a photo is real, computer generated, or edited, and the host claims the results show something in the sky that has been removed to hide it from the timeline. The audience is invited to comment on what they think the object in the sky might be, and the host promises a comparison to another analyzed photo showing that a figure in the sky is not random. The host asserts that the sky event was removed to conceal it, and speculates that the object was an airship, suggesting its significance in transportation and power beyond mainstream understanding. The narration then shifts to a discussion of the Royal Courts of Justice in London, noting a design competition held between 1866 and 1867 and claiming 12 architects produced master plans. The host quips that 12 London-based designers could produce such plans in the 1800s, contrasting with a modern claim that none could replicate it today. The winner, George Street, is said to have procured materials from Bull and Sons, with a running joke about “sons” in company names typical of the era. The host questions how a project of this scale could be completed in eight years, and points out a recurring pattern of architects dying before project completion and teams continuing the work. The host lists numerous alleged inconsistencies: the interior containing over 1,000 rooms, three and a half miles of corridors, and a belief that a major strike disrupted the project; claims that German builders were brought in; and assertions about the project’s rapid completion despite supposed labor disputes. The episode then introduces a critique of the name George Street as a recurring element in AI-generated names, noting examples like Richard Blackhead, Richard Seward, Peter Desroaches, and Peter Checkapork, as well as multiple Johns and Marys connected to Downcomb and other families. The host suggests that AI-generated patterns are generating these names across the world. Further, the host discusses the supposed involvement of George Street in other projects and questions the ages claimed for Street’s first building, Saint Mary’s Church, implying that the dates and biographical details are inconsistent with the supposed era. The narrative attributes the confusion to AI-generated fabrication, insisting that George Street’s supposed age during construction would be implausible, and contends that a Cornish clergyman, Reverend Prine, and a sister named Mary conspired to assign the commission. The episode then moves to a broader assertion that global narratives around the 1800s, orphan crises, civil conflicts, and race to document grand buildings are part of a larger deception. The host references a California trip to present footage of buildings and teases future coverage, while calling out a Pennsylvania castle, Linenwold Castle, built in 1890 and later turned into an orphanage, as an example of a rushed construction narrative. The host critiques househistree.com for lacking construction details and for weaving stories around rooms and features, while suggesting the Windsor Castle as a proposed model for the Pennsylvania castle and arguing that the Windsor timeline ties to a purportedly ancient civilization. The underlying message is that histories and timelines are fabricated, and that ancient and modern civilizations may share advanced technologies and knowledge across eras. The host concludes by asserting that the timeline is flawed starting around 1800, with old-world castles existing alongside modern narratives, implying that planes, trains, cars, phones, and AI have appeared in cycles long before claimed timelines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Through forensic photo analysis, I found a massive historical cover up. I started by looking at photos from the late eighteen hundreds to the early nineteen hundreds. This specific photo caught my eye. Something was off and that's when I zoomed in on it. The tree line has clearly been altered. It's much darker behind the trees where the editor got lazy and didn't wipe out the sky. And this was just the beginning of it. Because when I see one flaw, I know that it's time to investigate. A forensic photo analysis uses algorithms that we can determine if it's a real photo, computer generated, or if it was modified and edited. So I sent the photo into the forensic photo analysis and the results were shocking. We clearly have something in the sky that has been removed from this photo. Before I give my thoughts on what it is, I just want all of you to look at it for a second and let me know in the comments below what you think that is. I'll also show you a comparison to another photo that I had analyzed to show that having a figure in the sky is not random and not normal. There was something here in this photo and it's been edited out. It's undeniable. It's been removed to hide it from our timeline. In my opinion, this was an airship. We were never supposed to understand just how popular this free form of transportation really was. It was much more powerful than we could ever imagine. Welcome to episode 53 of my lunch break. I hope you're having a great day. And if you're new, welcome. Here we have a castle. Oh, did I say castle? I meant courthouse. We have the Royal Courts of Justice located in London, England, where for some weird reason, they just couldn't decide on a design for this project. There were so many designs coming in with master plans that they needed to hold a design competition, which was very common back in the eighteen hundreds because, of course, these eighteen hundreds people were just brilliant. It was very simple stuff back then. They just weren't distracted. They worked harder than us. And as long as they could draw it on a piece of paper with their feather, Donkeys Incorporated had the construction side of things down. Never an issue in the eighteen hundreds. So the competition began in 1866, a hundred and fifty eight years ago, and ended in 1867. After 12 architects drew up their master plans, something that nobody will ever create again today, They supposedly had 12 guys in just London that could draw this type of thing up. In 2023 or 2024, we have a total of zero people that could draw this up and get it constructed in the entire world, let alone just London. A hundred and fifty eight years ago, according to the mainstream narrative, this was, of course, no problem at all. Very simple stuff. So in 1868, they picked George Street. He was the champion of this contest. He went and got Messer's bull and his sons. Because in the eighteen hundreds, every single construction company in the whole world has to have sons at the end of it for some reason. Going back to the great Samuel Hannaford's and Sons, and there's many other examples throughout the episodes. In fact, throughout the first 52 episodes, I would love to know how many times we found a company with sons attached to the name. In my opinion, this is another clear pattern proving that the AI is generating these names all over the world. Now just to put this all into perspective, if we are trusting the mainstream story only fifty seven years prior to all of this happening, Abe Lincoln, a president of The United States, was being born in this masterpiece. The USA supposedly broke away from England and supposedly beat them in the war. If The USA was that smart and could beat England in a war, surely ly an architect or two would have followed along to America. I mean, London alone had 12. Surely The USA would have gotten one or two. So in eighteen o nine, we have shed masterpieces being put together with perfection. And all over London, we have the interior holding more than 1,000 rooms that include various meeting chambers, administrative offices, and at least, but could be more than 78 courtrooms. Additionally, Additionally, there are are three three point point five five miles miles of of corridors. Corridors. And supposedly, have all of this being constructed even though we're told that the may led a serious strike in the beginning beginning of of the the project. Project. Bullcrap Bullcrap and Sons had to find more master builders, which of course was simple stuff in the eighteen hundreds. There was plenty to go around. So they were able to get some from Germany and they knocked this entire thing out with perfection And it will last forever. And even though there were some issues finding new people to construct this place, it wasn't a problem really. They got the whole thing done and settled in in just eight years. Are you on the fence? Should we go deeper? Not only was this done with perfection, the winner of the contest, George Street, as we have seen so many times before, dies before the project was completed. This is so repetitive where the winner of a design competition doesn't live to see the end of the project, and they're able to just bring anybody else in to finish it. Doesn't matter who. Everybody could do this back in the eighteen hundreds with ease. So then we have the church of Saint Mary, the Virgin Ivanhoe. And this will all tie together, but this was found around eight hundred years ago in the year 1220 or 1222, which, I mean, come on. It was the booming December. They worked by moonlight. Very busy people. Very dedicated. Lots of skilled hunters and gatherers without a power tool in sight. Actually, six hundred and seventy three years away from a power tool supposedly. And of course, the building will be there forever. They are addicted to lying because it is thought that an even older church may have originally stood here. I'm just surprised they didn't say that the first one burned down in a fire. The church was, of course, rebuilt for some reason. In the year 01/02/1934, which was only twelve years after they say they found it. And they say that some of the original features survived. Survived? Wait. Why are they rebuilding it? What happened? Did I miss some oh, you gotta be joking. Four years after they found it, it supposedly burned down in a fire. To believe these stories, it would take some effort at this point. And I'm just gonna be honest with you. In my opinion, that isn't even the craziest part of the story. Let's go even deeper. But before we do that, I just wanna show you all the reoccurring AI generated names really quick. We have Richard Blackhead and Richard Seward. We have two Richards. And of course, Peter Desroaches and Peter Checkapork. So we got two Peters and two Richards. We have more builders in London that like to build with their sons, John Warner and Sons with, of course, another John down here at the bottom, John Downcomb, where he has two wives, marries both of them, and one's named Mary. We have John Downcomb, and, of course, we can't forget about the other Downcomb, Thomas, and the other one William. And for the best part of this name generator, William married two people, Mary and Alice, spelled a l I c e. John Downcombe. Guess who he marries? Do I even need to say it? I think we all know at this point what her name will be. Another Alice, spelled a l y c e. If you're new to this and on the fence, if the AI is generating these names, this is not the first time that this has happened. You're gonna wanna check out episode 43 and all the reoccurring names in that one. Are we having fun? Are we ready for the best part? Remember, when we are told about the George Street guy, you know, the guy that died in the middle of the 1,000 room palace project that was done in eight years, a hundred and fifty eight years ago, guess who the AI just had to add in here to try to explain this one away as well. Mister George Edmund Street. When in 1871 to 1872, he of course knocked out some Victorian Gothic revival style elements and built the north and south porches, as well as a medieval style baptistry. Of course, did. None of that was original, and this is totally believable. Oh, wait. It isn't? No. This was here long before anyone named George Street came around, and he did not do any medieval style construction in a year, a hundred and fifty three years ago. This was constructed by the previous civilization that was much more advanced than we are today. And now that we know that George Street is a pawn in their generated system, it's time to investigate even further. I have located George Street in all of his supposed projects. And remember in the eighteen hundreds, he was doing projects that we cannot recreate today in just one year. George Street was supposedly born in 1824. How old do you think he was when he was completing his first building? 35 would be shocking. 30 is insane. We are told that George Street got to work and built the Saint Mary's Church in 1848, making Street just 24 years old. And if you go on to this church's website, they say he was 22, where his sister, an embroiderer, heard of a Cornish clergyman and needed a new church built. Who better to ask than a 22 or 24 year old clerk? His sister Mary prevailed to give her inexperienced brother the commission for his brand new church. The rest, as they say, is his story. So obviously, this is ridiculous. And we need to keep digging because wait. Oh. Are they really gonna keep doing this today? What was his sister's name again? And what is the church's name? Both named Mary? Okay. I think at this point, we can be sure that they won't do it again. Right? No. No way. George Street. His name is George. What is the guy's name that is building the building that hired George Street? They're not gonna tell us that this guy's name is also George. If they say that his name is George, then I don't know what I'm gonna do, but what is Reverend Prine's name? You know, the Cornish clergyman who intended to build the new Street Mary Church where George's sister Mary went and asked George Prine. I knew it was the AI before. I don't get shocked at things very often. This one is just so in your face. It's incredible. The good old Cornish clergyman giving away work in Cornwall. Amazing. I think we can do a few episodes on this first George, George Street, and probably a few episodes on the second George and all the Marys. Let me know if you want me to dig more into their narrative. So George Street, the first George, the 22 or 24 year old master builder. Remember, he was constructing this 1,000 room courthouse in London for seven years because he was kicked out of the script a year before it got done in 1882. And remember, from our last episode, episode 52, this is the exact same time period where you have all this chaos going on around the world. Nobody is focused on these narratives. You have all these millions of orphans all over The USA. You have the civil war going on. You have slavery. You have all these insane high intensity type events going on all over the place. People were not looking into George Street and the hundreds of buildings that they were pinning on this character. In fact, even if they wanted to, it wasn't written in a book yet. And they didn't have the resources to prove anything, so they just had to simply believe it. And everyone accepted it as the truth until now. 1873 to 1881, George Street is pinned as the man in charge of the royal courts of justice for those eight years. I would love to know if he was fully focused on this project, one that we could never reproduce today in eight years. And we have shown the Kuluxinski Building in Chicago where it is a basic box that took our civilization fourteen years to build from 1960 to 1974? Or was George so good at his job that he could also get multiple other projects done at the exact same time? 1873 to 1881, George has been pinned and said to have had 42 other projects going on at the exact same time. Still believing the mainstream narrative? Alright. Now before we start the bonus, I wanna let you all know that we went to California this month and got some cool footage of some really cool buildings out there. So we will be talking about that and showing what we found in one of the upcoming episodes. We're just getting all the footage together, and I'll keep you posted on that. And I wanna thank all of our batch members and Patreons and every single subscriber. You guys are all awesome and really helping grow this channel. Alright. Here we go. They tell us that the Linenwold Castle located in Ambler, Pennsylvania was designed by Milton Bean and built in 1890 without any details on its construction. It's just done in 1890. Where Madison lived in the castle with his second wife Mary, where after Madison died, the new people turned this palace into an orphanage called Saint Mary's. Mary, Mary, Mary. So we have a massive castle done in one year or less. And for decades, that's all we needed to hear for it to be true until now, where we understand that logically, that is impossible, especially a hundred and thirty four years ago. And especially when it's a castle straight out of the old world civilization's home improvement catalog. Here on househistree.com, in the middle of this story that has zero logistical details or anything relevant to actually building anything and just has a bunch of nonsense, like naming sons royal, retired business partners, and telling us how many rooms are in this castle that they found. They do give us a tip and the tip is the Windsor Castle. The sentence reads, that Madison Madison might have chose to model his castle after the Windsor Castle, which is the most popular answer. And it's the most popular answer among which group because that is definitely not the most popular answer to us. But they think it might be modeled after another castle nearby and they all dispute it for years and years. And remember, it's all nonsense. We have no idea who this group is that they tell us, that this is the most popular thought. What I see in all of this is one thing, the Windsor Castle. And I wanna see what year they say this Windsor Castle was built in because I bet you it is connected to this castle. And this castle in Pennsylvania might have actually been built hundreds of years ago, if not thousands. And they will give it all away with this Windsor Castle connection located in Berkshire, Windsor, built in 1070 over nine hundred and fifty four years ago as a fortress and covers 484,000 square feet of living space divided into about 1,000 rooms. So something is extremely clear here. We are 100% being lied to about our history, and we all know that. But I have to say it out loud because 1,000 ago, they are building 1,000 room fortresses with ease. And it, of course, lasts forever. No questions asked. And today, we have evolved so much that we can't build a sidewalk without stepping in it before it dries. Now this is my opinion, but I can see them adding this Windsor Castle into the narrative for a specific reason. And I personally think it's to connect the dates that these castles are from nearly one thousand years ago when the previous civilization that had all the technology, had proper training, and had the logistics down. Instead of the opposite happening where we are told that there were no classes in castle building at the local community college in the year 1070, where they would go home to their sheds and sleep with candlelight freezing using barn hay as beds, and then waking up again traveling by horse and wagon to pull stone and granite miles on a trail and getting this 1,000 room fortress done no problem. The timeline is clearly all over the place at this point. They could have told us that it was built in the year 1045. It would have made no difference. And people would have just believed it until you start digging deeper, which we are doing here. Episode 41 is awesome at showing the proper logistics of a project, if you're interested in that after this. The castle has, of course, 300 fireplaces and 379 clocks. Do any of our towns have any upcoming plans to knock a 1,000 room, 300 fireplace fortress out in the next few years. What about half that? No? With our modern construction, one thousand years after they did this, we should be able to do this with ease since they did without a power tool in sight. Supposedly, we have a better education system, so we are told. We have more knowledge than ever, supposedly. What is wrong with this picture? I would say a lot. Do you understand that something is wrong with the timeline? Something massive? Can we all see the lie very clearly now? We have been lied to about all of this starting around the year 1800 and possibly right before that, where everything in our timeline began and the old world buildings from the previous civilization are still here for us to see in every city with insane narratives to try to fit them into this lie, where we are told that people from one thousand years ago were less than us. Worse off, and we are told that we have all this brand new technology in the last two hundred years. Everything is brand new. Every company was created recently all over the world. Is that not strange to you? And we're told this new technology has never been here before. Planes, trains, cars, phones, computers, Internet, and the AI when it has. And in my opinion, it's been here many, many times before, and so have we.
Saved - March 30, 2026 at 5:03 AM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

All of the "moon rocks" NASA astronauts said they got from the moon have been tested, and are complete fakes. Next question. https://t.co/bhHvkyQAQs

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 points out that part of the reason people doubt the moon landing is the story of bringing back 842 pounds of moon rocks, which are now on display in museums. They note that there was a rock allegedly misidentified or mislabeled in a museum, and it was given to a foreign dignitary after testing. Speaker 1 adds that Neil Armstrong said, in his own words, he saw a rock on the surface of the moon, picked it up specifically for the prime minister of The Netherlands, and put it in his pocket. He “brought it, gave it to him,” they sealed it in a box and immediately put it in a museum in a clear box. The curator of the museum reportedly saw the speaker’s movie, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon, and in the middle of the night opened the hermetically sealed container, which they presumed would stay sealed for all time, put it under a microscope, and it turned out to be a piece of petrified wood. He notes it looks out of this world, but unless trees are growing on the moon, it’s a fake moon rock. The speaker then asks, if the moon rocks are fake, what about the moon mission?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But part of the reason why people don't think that the moon landing is fake is because there's this story about them bringing back 842 pounds worth of moon rocks, and now these moon rocks are on display in museums. And as I know that there was the one rock that was supposedly misidentified or mislabeled in a museum, and it was given to some foreign dignitary and they tested mislabeled. Speaker 1: Neil Armstrong said out of his own mouth, he saw a rock on the surface of the moon. He picked it up specifically for the prime minister of The Netherlands, put it in his pocket, chain of custody, brought it, gave it to him. They sealed it in a box and immediately put it in a museum, you know, a clear box. And there you go. Curator of the museum apparently saw my movie, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon. It goes, never thought about that. And in the middle of the night, opened the hermetically sealed container they presumed would stay sealed for all time, put it under a microscope, and it's a piece of petrified wood. It looks out of this world, but unless trees are growing on the moon, it's a fake moon rock. So no one asked the question, if the moon rocks are fake, what about the moon mission?
Saved - March 21, 2026 at 1:52 PM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

The Tartarian Empire - Full Theory Explained https://t.co/kFxPjJMRXR

Saved - March 21, 2026 at 1:51 PM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

🇦🇺⚠️ AUSTRALIAN FRIENDS (tag any you know) There's no soft way for me to put this... The entire story of history you were given about your country was a lie. The Old World Australia rabbit hole goes DEEP. Dive in with @MYLUNCHBREAK_ 👇 https://t.co/SlxW01R3vn

Saved - March 21, 2026 at 1:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see patterns across our realm: highly-advanced stone palaces with no known builders, holy sites atop buried ruins, and bones of entire civilizations beneath places of worship. Legends say angels were the architects—what if they weren’t legends? This video by MYLUNCHBREAK pulls back the curtain on what’s under our feet, above our heads, and hidden in plain sight. Once you see it, you cannot unsee.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Did Angels Help Build The Old World? All over our realm, the same shocking patterns repeat: HIGHLY-advanced stone palaces with no known builders, holy sites standing on top of buried ruins, and bones of entire civilizations arranged beneath places of worship... Legends say angels were the architects...but what if these weren’t legends at all? This video by @MYLUNCHBREAK_ (follow him!) pulls back the curtain on what’s really under our feet, above our heads, and hidden in plain sight. Once you see it...you cannot unsee 👁️👁️

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explores the idea that many ancient and religious structures around the world may contain or reflect a hidden history in which angels or a previous advanced civilization played a direct role in their construction. They frame this as a pattern seen across continents and cultures, not as isolated myths, and urge viewers to consider information that challenges mainstream histories. Key points and examples: - The Basilica of the Holy House in Loreto, Italy is described as a Marian shrine said to enshrine the house Mary lived in, with a claim that angels flew the house from Nazareth. The host asks what happened to civilization’s know-how and suggests a hidden elite construction capability that predates current narratives. - The episode proposes that angels are repeatedly depicted or implied in construction narratives worldwide, implying a global, ancient, advanced knowledge that was later erased or suppressed. - Mecca’s Kaaba is cited as another example where the initial structure is said to have been built by angels, with angels revolving around it after its construction, reinforcing the theme of divine or otherworldly involvement in architecture. - Chartres Cathedral is highlighted as one of the world’s most incredible structures, with references to multiple cathedrals on the same site and a recurring pattern of rebuilding after fires, wars, or collapses. The narrator notes episodes about catacombs and basements beneath churches (catacombs under churches referenced in prior episodes) as evidence of hidden, extensive underground networks. - The narrator asserts that many cathedrals and churches sit atop or connect to vast underground catacombs and secret passages, containing bones and skulls arranged in patterns, suggesting ritual uses and a “previous civilization” beneath modern structures. - Specific examples of bone-related sites are described to illustrate ritualistic or ceremonial uses of skulls and bones: - The Ossuary in the Czech Republic, claimed to hold 40,000 to 70,000 skeletons artistically arranged as chandeliers and garlands, implying a deliberate, symbolic architectural practice. - The Chapel of Bones in Evora, Portugal, where interior walls are decorated with human bones, with a plaque declaring, “What you are now, we once were. What we are now, you shall be,” and the basement described as containing corpses used to decorate the chapel. - The Capuchin crypt in Rome, beneath Our Lady of the Conception, described as containing thousands of bones arranged in elaborate displays, suggesting ritual use rather than merely burial. - The Saint Peter and Paul Cathedral in Kazan, Russia, discussed as another example in the Tartaria hypothesis, with claims of previous cathedral sites, destruction narratives, and new narratives replacing older ones. - The narrator asserts that these bone-and-crypt installations indicate a regular, worldwide pattern rather than isolated events, and that there is a deliberate effort to obscure the true past. - Tartaria is introduced as a purported global civilization or culture, with maps, seals, griffins, and griffin imagery associated with Tartarian influence. The speaker discusses Tatarstan (Tataria) and Kazan as potential remnants of Tartarian activity, arguing that modern seals, coats of arms, and architectural styles reflect a “replacement narrative” by later populations. - The Kazan Kremlin and Epiphany Tower are presented as examples of “old world palaces” that appear in modern times, with claims that their actual construction predates current histories and may have involved a sophisticated, worldwide civilization. - The host critiques the conventional dating of structures and suggests widespread underground networks, interconnected palaces, and a hidden global history. They invite viewers to question dates, authorship, and the origins of architectural achievements, proposing that a powerful, ancient civilization left markers of its presence across the world. - The episode closes with a provocative suggestion that Tartaria may still be present in modern locations, prompting viewers to explore further and comment on whether this hidden history is real and where else such evidence might be found.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Basilica Of The Holy House, a Marian Shrine located in Loretto, Italy, known for enshrining the holy house in which the blessed Virgin Mary is believed to have lived. We are told that this house inside of the building flown over to Loretto from Nazareth by angels. Angels flying palaces to new locations is exactly what we're reading right here. So I have to ask, what happened here where we all live today? It's not sounding so basic after all. Are we sure that we know the whole story? Are you ready to open your mind even further? Who occupied all of these structures all over the world? Massive structures that look so out of place today. We take our knowledge a step further, understanding that angels were possibly getting involved, embedded into our historical narratives within construction stories, a situation, a narrative that we have now seen multiple times within our research. Angels getting involved all over the world. We also get the replacing the original nod as well as the consumed in fire nod within the same sentence. So we know that this place is right up our alley. When we go inside, we get to see the Holy House. The same exact house that was supposedly being flown by angels, showing that there was a group of people here before all of us, a civilization that fully understood construction and were capable of so much more than just riding around on a donkey and living in wooden sheds, going to the bathroom in their front lawns. This is elite construction, elite technology, showing that the history that we've all been told has massive holes in it. There was a clear understanding of how to put a palace together before we all showed up, and this knowledge was worldwide. Like we have shown time and time again on this channel, there are numerous artistic depictions in and around the holy house of flying angels carrying this house all the way to this location where I now have to ask the question, did angels build this thing? We have seen this before in La La Bella where they got more than a little help from angels, where they came in on the night shift and helped to complete churches. Again, this is the house that Mary, the mother of Jesus, is believed to have lived in. And I think I've said this a lot in the past, but there's always some that need me to say it again. We are just researching here and trying to grow our knowledge of the past with the resources information that is available to us. And we have learned a lot to this point by simply asking questions and connecting things that we've seen before, connecting patterns, and the rest. You can always think whatever you'd like, but if there is information that tells us that angels were here and carried and possibly constructed palace like structures, I'm going to let you know about it. It would be one thing if this was a one off. One thing if it's just in one religion's narrative. The thing is is it's everywhere. Angels being involved in constructing palaces would be shocking. It would change everything about what we know about this place. It would give this place that we all live an extremely deeper meaning, showing that these so called myths may not be so mythical after all. When we go to Mecca, Saudi Arabia, and we see the Kaaba, we are told that this is the holiest shrine in Islam. We also get the reconstruction story again. But yet again, we are told within a separate religion that the initial structure was built by the angels. Allah instructed the angels to build the Kaaba. After its construction, the angels revolved around it. I also understand that these stories could just be made up. The thing is is that something happened here. Someone built these structures, and these structures are beyond what we're being told about in history one zero one. The structures are so out of place, and people that are born hundreds of years later, us, we intuitively understand that they are important without having any backstory at all. Sharing this information is what we are doing, adding a possibility to the table that the local legend may be filled with more truth than what is being written within our textbooks. The fact of the matter is is that somebody constructed these palaces. We can all go inside of them, and we're all at the point of trying to figure out how they all got here. Who built them? Where did this knowledge go? Why does it not fit in at all with the cowboys and Indian stories? Why did we go from palaces in every continent to dirt roads, Donkeys Incorporated, hammers and chisels with porta potties in the backyard? What happened? Did angels really assist in the construction that we all see today? Palaces that are now taken over and used to rule over us. Is this what's going on? You tell me. One thing is for sure. We are learning more and more by the episode. We are gaining more and more knowledge as a community, connecting dots, adding people that hold different skill sets, different knowledge, all coming together with different viewpoints, all to figure out what really happened here. The truth. One of the most incredible structures in the world today is the Chartres Cathedral located 50 miles Southwest of Paris, France. Constructed yet again in the December and yet again told that it stands on the same exact site of at least five cathedrals that have occupied this exact same site. A very clear nod, repeating narratives all over the world. This is the fifth one and then stands on Romanesque basements. We all know about the basements at this point. Episode seventy two and seventy eight. Catacombs underneath the churches, generating an energy connecting with the bones underneath the floor. These buildings are so much more than what we are told and expand throughout the entire city underground. We have shown this. So what happened to the previous four churches? Did you know about this pattern five years ago? Did you know that it was all over the world? Did you know that every single one of these structures from the old world held the exact same narrative. When did we all learn about this knot? That at least five cathedrals have stood on this site, each replacing an earlier building damaged by war or fire. The year July. The church was finally mentioned in text. If you can go and visit this thing, I suggest doing that as soon as possible. The year 1020, fire damages the cathedral. The year 1094, fire destroys much of the city and a large part of the cathedral. Again, rebuilding it, no problem at all, one thousand years ago. It's ridiculous. Just do a little fundraising in 1094, and we're all back in business until, of course, fifteen o seven comes around when the North Tower is damaged by fire. I personally believe, and I've said this in the past, I believe that the more fire that is thrown into the story, I believe the bigger the treasure. 1836, fire destroys the roof beams and roof, and then this group is here to save the day yet again. Just take a look at this thing for a minute. Look at the Griffin right here. The detail is insane. It's so obvious at this point that what we are being told about our past is missing a massive civilization or civilizations that were extremely advanced, and their work lasts forever. Our history is important because it proves that where we live is so much more in-depth. It has so much more meaning than what we're being told. Purposely chopping off the heads of these individuals in the middle. We have seen this so many times, hiding what people used to look like, in my opinion. It would change everything. We've seen where the heads go rolling down the hill from a picky earthquake. We just need 50 meters of crushed stone way up on that mountain, 7,000 feet in the air. What would we do without that crushed stone two thousand years ago? This story is ridiculous where the statues, each over nine meters tall, have all been damaged by earthquakes. But these were no ordinary earthquakes. These were the earthquakes that would chop the heads off of statues from two thousand years ago. Extremely picky earthquakes that just wanted the heads, all documented. No. Of course, it's not. Where the earthquakes took their stone heads and sent them rolling down the hillside, or did someone go in there and remove the heads? But the arms and the legs are perfectly fine. So what are they hiding here? There's angels depicted all over this thing. I don't believe this is just art. I think there is enough evidence at this point that angels were here. I don't believe that they just accidentally construct statues of people with wings in so many different continents a thousand years ago. All on accident with more statues heads removed here down at the bottom, a clear attack on our true past over and over again right here. Look at this thing. How many arms and legs do you see that got removed from this depiction? And then count how many heads. They are removed all over this thing. Was there another type of being here that we aren't supposed to see? We can see that the angels are here yet again in the middle. I do see a hand chopped off here in the center where you have to ask, was he holding something of significance? Because the guy next to him is holding a box, so it seems like they both might have been holding something. And then the entire group down here got their heads taken. So there's something to this for sure. One two three four five six seven eight. Eight heads on the right. And then 123456789 on the left. Is this by accident? I don't believe so. In the middle here, above the building structure, his head is also gone. This is so odd in my opinion. This is something that we definitely need to keep in mind for the future. Or if you're going to one of these buildings, something to look for. The first row of people here, all the way around the center, they are all angels. Every single one of them are angels. There's, like, 30 angels depicted here. All by mistake? I don't believe that's a mistake one bit. This is incredible. If you see anything of significance that I'm missing, please let me know in the comments. Incredibly detailed construction old world and is now in our world. A place that we can all go and see. This was being constructed a thousand years ago with multiple reconstruction projects. Getting it fixed up, no problem at all. Just a little bowling alley fundraiser gets you back on track. And then we're all told that we are evolving and advancing. Could you imagine? Alright. Everybody, we've done a lot of evolving and advancing lately. In fact, it's been a thousand years. So we're gonna put one of these together in Memphis, Tennessee. Memphis, a palace is on the way. Could you imagine? No. I couldn't imagine, which is showing that we're not evolving and we're not advancing. But this happened all the time before we all got here. There is no progressing going on. Clearly, we are going backwards, and I believe that this is all by design. We are given technology back, technology that has all been here before. This place that we all live seems like it had things here, things that don't look like us at all. We've seen it over and over again, whether it was from text or statues like we have all over the structure. There are so many depictions of people with faces that are on their stomach, individuals with horns, horses that fly. And I gotta be honest with you. I have no idea where we are or what has been here. The further that I go into this research, the more that we find. At this point, I personally have to look at this structure. I have to trust what it's depicting more than what someone wrote twenty five years ago. The ones that constructed this were, in my opinion, depicting what they knew about the world that they lived in. Angels all over the place, women marrying or at least together with individuals with horns. And what is this guy doing with his hand? I think I've seen that gesture before. And then we get a floor pattern inside. Clearly, it's a technology that we all thought was just a nice addition to the place where it is thought that the bishop would dance through the labyrinth with parishioners as a part of a religious ritual. Rituals going on inside of the structure, things happening today that a lot of us don't understand, and then we enter them freely, uneducated as to what is actually going on or has gone on. We do not understand the true purpose of this place that we live by design. And I'm gonna say it again. Not every one of these places are used for this, but some clearly are. Used in multiple continents. It's a technology for sure from the old world. And not all technology from the old world is good. Rituals to honor the spirits. The Chinese used them to keep time in ceremonial rituals. What is a ritual, you might ask? I'm not going to get into it too far, but we all know that there are some rituals out there that have been depicted for a very long time. Offer Sacrifice. Something that has been going on for a very long time, and I'm just gonna move on at this point. The church of the Resurrection, which we have discussed, palaces from the old world that are still here today. We are told it was built on the site that Jesus was crucified and buried, and we know this part. We've talked about it. But did we know that some stories suggest that angels appeared to Constantine the Great's mother, Saint Helena, and guided her to the site where the church was to be built. And then we're told that the angels are just symbolic. Right. Yet another account of angels getting involved. And I wanna know your opinion because I wanna know at this point, is it more believable that a guy with no power tools built this, or is it possible that there may have been assistance like we are being told and shown through depictions right on the buildings? The Santiago De Compostela Arch Cathedral Basilica located in Spain. It is said to have been built with the help of angels according to local legend, not history one zero one written by Steve the know it all in the front row. Of course, no offense to all the Steves out there. The apostle Saint James, his remains were yet again transported to the site by angels. Later, when the cathedral was being built over his tomb, angels, just like we have shown over and over, believed to have provided assistance to the previous civilization, the old world. Yet again, providing assistance to the workers to construct a palace like structure that lasts forever and yet again has depictions of those angels all over it on the outside of the building as well as the inside. Are you ready to go back into the catacombs? Just like we have seen every single time, the location of this chapel is in the historic center of Naples, Italy. The alchemist's chamber or chamber of secrets descending underground beneath the chapel yet again. We find two human skulls, and this is just the beginning. It's clearly symbolic for what is possibly behind that drywall, looking very different from the original plan where half of the descendants would be placed above and then half beneath the main level of the chapel for reasons that are unknown. Now I want everybody to understand that this is most likely a bunch of nonsense. And I say this because we have seen this so many times all over the world where millions of bones are placed underneath these places of worship. They know exactly why they're there, telling us reasons are unknown. This is telling us a lie, and we know this now. The prince is also most likely a fictional character, a fictional backstory as to why there are bones underneath this chapel right in the middle of Naples, Italy. This place is also home to marble statues that are clearly not carved by hammers and chisels. We are told that these were carved in 1753, portraying Christ deposed after crucifixion, covered by a transparent veil, just chiseling marble perfectly in 1753, and then going home to his wooden shed, freezing in winters, no indoor plumbing, just relieving himself in a pot. They didn't even have toilet paper yet. Using whatever was available, using old rags, moss, leaves, or the good old trusty hand as we're told. But we are told that this hand wiping wiping civilization was just next door chiseling marble veils. So clearly, somebody is lying. And here we go. The entire chapel is filled with symbolism. The chamber is said to contain secret passages, hidden rooms, and I guarantee that there are networks of tunnels, massive catacombs, all connecting to the central point, this location, this chapel. Some of these symbols inside the structure include the glory of heaven, a triangle that hides meanings that must be read in an alchemical Masonic way. The triangle signifies alchemically or sulfur and, of course, fire, where they have more angel and dragon depictions inside. It's just art, of course. If any one of these people that are just standing in line to get in just looked up for two seconds, they would see what is carved into the door frame. This place, in my opinion, without a doubt, is a massive network of catacombs located right below their feet. Hidden rooms, secret passages, skulls on their front door, symbolism all over the place here. Let's take this up a notch and go even deeper. Staying in Italy, more specifically, Rome. We have the Our Lady Of The Conception Of The Capuchins, a Roman Catholic church. It is the first Roman church dedicated to the Immaculate Conception, looking very nice and peaceful inside the building. Nothing too crazy. Everything is just fine until you scroll down to the crypt section. And just like we found on this channel back in episode 72 part one of the catacombs, the crypt is located under the church. Every single time this is the case, holding the remains of thousands of people, thousands of bones right below the floor of this church, the crypt is divided into five chapels, lit only by dim natural light seeping in through the cracks. The crypt walls are decorated with the remains in elaborate fashion, making this crypt a work of art. This is insane. Can you believe that this is going on under so many churches in so many countries proving that this was a common practice? It was not just a clear space for the cemeteries. In my opinion, it was a ritual. And I say possibly, but I mean probably, still is today. Structures and buildings, knowledge of the past. Where did all these people go? Why didn't the great fires of the eighteen hundreds kill thousands of people? Inhaling smoke would have done this by itself, and we've shown this. What if these great fires did? Or what if they were already gone and placed into geometric patterns? A previous civilization placed right under all of our feet, unaware that they were all under our feet, under the places of worship until now. The crypt originated of a rich and creative cult for their dead. Great spiritual masters meditated and preached with a skull in their hand. Meditating with a skull on their hand, under a church. What are we reading? What is going on here? I definitely was not taught about this in history 01/2001 or 01/2002 for that matter. With a bone chilling message, a plaque right here in the center. And one of the chapels reads in three languages, what you are now, all of us, we once were, the previous civilization. What we are now, the plan right here on this plaque and what they have done to the previous civilization, putting them under our feet, putting them in places of worship. Let's read this again. What you are now, we once were. What we are now, you shall be. Crazy that they put this right on the wall, telling us what the plan is, showing who those people are. I think this proves who they were and where the previous civilization really went. And it would be one thing if this was the only one in the world. But like we have shown now within episode 72, episode 78, and now episode 92, this is not even close to a once off. It's in so many countries, and most of it is not open to the public, meaning that there are most likely so many more people that we're not told about or can see. We have seen this in Odessa. The catacombs are 1,600 miles long, a three level system reaching a depth of 200 feet below the sea level, a massive network. Or the Paris Catacombs, we are told that they are a 174 miles long. However, only a small portion is open to the public, extending deep beneath the city streets, representing one of the largest grave sites in the world. So we don't know if they are bigger than a 174 miles. But to suggest that they could fit a previous civilization, I mean, they definitely could. Now we're gonna move to Poland. We have the Skull Chapel. There's nothing weird going on here at all. No skulls on the door, not a single symbol that would give anything away. Do you see anything odd about this picture? Am I missing anything? I do see more angels, but that's just art, of course. And the building does look like it's going below the street level, which is kinda odd. And what is this in the basement? How did this get here? You know, if they found this underneath somebody's house today, I think we would all be a little skeptical, and I think it would get its own Netflix series. But as long as it's underneath a church, everything seems to check out and be just fine with everybody. Can we all wake up? At what point do we all say, that does seem a little odd. Maybe there is something weird about that. Maybe thousands of bones underneath the floors of all of these places of worship is a little odd. It is a little weird that my history teacher didn't tell me about this. It is a little odd that they are all put into geometric patterns. And I guess it is a little weird that they're holding skulls in their hand while practicing rituals all over the world in the basement. Anybody? A little odd? Yeah? Okay. And a nice no touching sign right here case anybody is insane and wants to do that. Ritualistic intentions in my opinion. Right beneath your feet all over the world. Collecting the bones, cleaning them all up, and putting them under the chapel. The Sedlec Ossuary, Czech Republic. I told you we are just getting started, and I'm going to turn your reality upside down. I'm going to show you something that you will never unsee. The Ossuary is estimated to contain skeletons of between 40,000 people and 70,000 people, and we know it is most likely more, whose bones have in many cases have been artistically arranged to reason we're that's we're proud thinking for yourself? Understand And that what you've been told is planned. There was a previous civilization here, a civilization that was just like us, that was extremely advanced. They held technology to create massive palaces all over the world. We have shown this masterpiece marble art that will be here forever. Again, all of this information is sitting right in front of your face. It's always been here. These places are real. We can all go and see them whenever we'd like. It's up to you to open your eyes and see the truth. I'm gonna say it again. Imagine any other place in the world, a grocery store, somebody's house, a warehouse, a restaurant, a mall, anywhere else. Imagine that they had 40 to 70,000 people, bones, laid in artistic designs under their floors, holding skulls in their hand for meditation. What would we all think about that place? Why is this so acceptable? Because it's under a church. This is strategic. It's by design. The Ossuary is among the most visited tourist attractions of The Czech Republic, drawing over 200,000 visitors annually with chandeliers of bones containing at least one of every bone in the human body, hangs from the center of the nave with garlands of skulls draping the vault. Why is this a place that people are paying to visit? If I'm just being honest, they've done an incredible job manipulating the masses, telling us it will be us right on the wall one day. And we pay them to go look at the people that are now chandeliers. And they are so good at doing this that it's now somehow normalized. One of the most disgusting places in the world, in my opinion. Hundreds of thousands of us pay to go inside every year. Have we all lost our minds? We have shown that these things connect to schools, places of worship, hospitals, and then they put this kind of art in there. A decoration apparently. Moving over to the Chapel Of Bones. We are told it is one of the best known monuments in Evora, Portugal. Just a great attraction. A chapel located right next to the entrance of the Church Of Saint Francis. How did the Chapel Of Bones get its name? Well, it gets its name because the interior walls are covered and decorated with human skulls and bones, of course, and a great place to spend your Saturday. Come on down. And then they need to make sure they put these glass barriers up so that nobody goes and touches the bones because people just can't seem to help it. What is going on? Who would seriously pay to go in one of these, let alone go and touch the bones? Oh my gosh. If you could see me now, you would see that I'm looking at these people shaking my head. It's under the church though, so it's acceptable. No. Did you know that this was below our feet? Did you know how extensive this was? Did you know that it was worldwide? Did you know that this one holds an estimated 5,000 corpses to decorate the walls of the chapel? The bones just came from ordinary people, of course, arranged into a variety of patterns. Such a normal thing to do under a chapel. Not weird at all. Very normal thing for chapels to do. But if a convenience store starts taking ordinary people and arranging them into variety of patterns, I don't think anybody's gonna pay and take pictures. We're not gonna get 200,000 people a year in a Walgreens basement. But the place of worship, not an issue, of course. No problem. At what point do we wake up? I'm gonna go deeper. I was going to show you these photos that are down there, but then I read this sentence of what is underneath this chapel. So you can go look at the pictures for yourself. I am not sharing it here. This basement, a place of worship, holds two corpses, one of which is this. And then people pay to go in there. And this is acceptable somehow. Written on the roof of this chapel is the phrase, better is the day of death than the day of birth. And we can now see who we are dealing with. A group that doesn't seem to enjoy our company. A group that seems to be fully in control of the masses. So much so that they think these places are payment worthy. The photos that are under this church, in my opinion, are disgusting. Understanding what is under our feet is incredibly important and see what has been going on all of our lives. Places that are used as ritualistic practices, things that we are told right on their websites, holding skulls for meditation, bones of the past placed into artistic designs, decorations to make chandeliers, plaques that read that what we are now, they once were. What they are now, we shall be. If you were on the fence about this research before, unsure if there was a previous civilization that was wiped out, unsure if we are being given back technology from the past, thinking that the narrative that we're all told worldwide, thinking that it was giving you the full story. Are you still on the fence? I think now is the time we all get off it. When we go to Austria, Hallstatt to be specific, an Austrian house of bones filled with hundreds of intricately painted skulls. We are told that in the seventeen hundreds, the church began digging up corpses. In my opinion, this was the previous civilization from the mud, all to make way for the newly dead, an excuse that we have seen before, taking up too much room. So let's paint these ones and put them into geometric patterns for fun and then do rituals and also make people pay to see them. Sounds good? No. Tightly stacked over 1,200 skulls. Once the skeletons were removed from the mud, they bleached them in the sun. And then 1720 comes around, and they start painting them. A nice tradition, apparently, decorated with an assortment of symbols. Though this practice has been dying out since the nineteen sixties, they took a woman from 1983, and they entered her into the Osweeri in 1995, showing that this is still going on today. Tartaria, a location that we are shown on maps that predate our current civilization. Tartaria, a location that has been kept quiet from all of us within the education systems all over the world. A location that we can clearly see is Russia on a modern day map. With a population of around 4,000,000 people today located within Russia's walls, there is a location today that is called Tatarstan, officially the Republic Of Tatarstan and sometimes called Tataria, where they just removed the r, and this is just the beginning. Wait until you see what is still standing in this location today. But first, I think that their coat of arms needs to be exposed. We know that Tartaria's flag depicted a griffin. We can zoom in here on it and get a better look As we go back to the historical coat of arms of this location of Tatarstan, we see their seal from 1672 and, of course, changed to this in 1856. And once 1920 hit, the process of removing the old world, the previous civilization, was in full swing. And this became their new seal, showing their hammers and chisels and a logo that some will recognize very well, a takeover worldwide. The Republic Of Tatarstan with their Griffin seal. It's very interesting. It is a part of the Volga Federal District, which we have discussed in previous episodes. Now I'm gonna drop the guy down in their city. We clearly have homes that are found from the old world and are being repurposed. We have the old brick being exposed as we obviously don't properly maintain these structures. Flipping this camera view around, we can see that the windows are down here by the ground. I believe that these houses are much deeper under the mud. These houses are over the top, all the way down the street. These people, us, we were placed into the old world's work and are just occupying it there. Could you even imagine how incredible this area once looked? And remember, this is just one road. Just wait until you see the rest. Let's continue down the road. And you can see fenced off here, we have an old world structure that has gotten a new paint job clearly. This is the Nicholas Cathedral with a historical narrative showing that there was, of course, a previous church here on this site, telling us that in 1565, there once stood a wooden church. 1565, knowing the exact date of the wooden church, telling us that the current temple, judging by its architectural forms and decor, was maybe built in the middle of the seventeenth century. Please tell me how they know the exact date of a church that isn't there, a wooden church, and they don't know the date of the current church. It is complete nonsense in my opinion. A very bad lie showing that the truth is not being told to us about this location. And this is when we go deeper. If I just knock my house down and I build a new one and then five hundred years from now, like we're being told, they know the exact date that my first house was built, but not the second one. So I need some feedback here. Are we all on the same page that this is insane? Let me know in the comments. So we're just getting started here. I wanna show you this location. You can see how old everything is. And hiding behind this tree, we have the Saint Peter And Paul Cathedral located in Kazan, the capital of the Russian Republic Of Tatarstan. They give us this long story about how the emperor arrived after mastering the sea, celebrating his fiftieth birthday with the guys, having a three day feast, having such a great time. Might as well build a cathedral while we're at it to honor this event. Why not? So the cathedral, of course, had a prior cathedral because these stories are clearly written by an AI, and I think we can confidently say that at this point. All over the world, we get the same structural narrative. So they knock out the cathedral in just four years, in the early seventeen hundreds, and the computer cannot forget to throw the destruction story right into the narrative when shortly after the building was done, it suddenly collapsed. So, of course, being the guy that he is, the czar sent his own craftsman and architects to complete the cathedral. We have no idea where any of the materials came from. We have no clue who these men were. We have no idea who the architects were, and they will forever be a mystery. But I'm just so thankful that we know all about the fiftieth birthday party they had and the three day feast. That kind of information just distracts me. I love it when they throw the back stories in there. So I never have to focus on who actually builds the palaces. No. To prove that this is a worldwide operation, and this is an AI generated story, to trick all of us into thinking that this structure isn't from the previous civilization, we get the nod. Yet Peter And Paul Cathedral has seen its share of tragic events, including numerous fires. If you don't understand how ChatGPT operates, I will show you right now. All I need to do is put the basic things that I want in there. Remember, if I can do this, then just imagine what can be done. All we have to do is tell the AI basic things that we all need in the story. I wrote that we need a hypothetical narrative about a cathedral. I need construction dates that lasted four years. I need a destruction story because they all have one with a savior, and I need a fire story, of course. And the cathedral manages to recover every time. Just like we are shown here, where the cathedral manages to recover every time and retain its former beauty. Place this time period in the seventeen hundreds and make it four paragraphs. This is how fast our history can be written, and this is how fast a population worldwide can be tricked and manipulated. This technology is not new, and we are now learning this and exposing it to the world that the narrative that we are all shown in classrooms from day one is, in my opinion, all created just like this. In the early seventeen hundreds, the Grand Cathedral began its construction in the heart of a bustling European city where the townspeople marveled at the design. Construction lasted from seventeen o three to seventeen o seven. Tragedy struck just five years later, just like we see every single time in these narratives. When a violent storm comes through and lightning hits the tallest spire, another knob that we always see. Remember, repetition gives it all away. The system doesn't know any other way. It's not a human. It even gives us a fake character that could now be used for so many other structures in the area. Fixed the place in 1715. And just sixteen years later, a fire broke out. It's literally the exact same narrative that we read all over the world with structures that look so out of place. Now I'm gonna refer to this episode in the future to show everybody just how this works. I wanna show you the inside of the Saint Peter And Paul Cathedral that we were just talking about. What do you think? Hammers and chisels or advanced technology that we aren't being told about? Kazan, the city in Tatarstan. This may be the location that we have all been searching for. It is at the very minimum, in my opinion. One of the main locations that Tartaria was active. I have said this many times. I believe that this previous civilization, the advanced group of humans, I believe that they were here only a few hundred years ago, and a mass event wiped them all out. With their buildings sitting right here in front of all of our faces and getting a brand new coat of paint on them with brand new narratives and looking so out of place. The Kazan Kremlin includes many old buildings. It is a fortified citadel containing museums and sacred sites. You can see that we are looking at a very important location for this research. We can make an educated guess at this point that this is not everything, and some structures have been removed. This city is filled with griffins. It's basically Griffin Central or in other words, the center of Tartaria. Kazan, a very interesting place for sure with Khan's Mosque located within the walls. Some scholars believe that the tower may date back further than the eighteenth century. This is an admission that they don't know who created this tower, a tower that we know here was created by the previous civilization. This is clear exposure here if you know what you're looking for. With the legend saying that the tower that lasts forever was built by Ivan the Terrible in just one week. One week, and this thing's here forever. And the tower's construction date is enshrouded in mystery. Are you having fun yet? Can you see that we are correct? Can you see that the truth about where we live is coming? Once you know the truth that the history that we are all told is not factual information, you can never unsee it. This is incredible. They have no idea who built this. I think they do know who built that, Grand Tartaria. Have we located their central base, a location that scholars won't touch? They won't even pretend to know who created that structure. It's amazing. Now that we've struck gold, let's keep going. Oh, and the tower used to be topped with a griffin. Oh, I mean, double headed eagle and was replaced by our civilization. Take a look at this place. This is the headquarters of Donkeys Incorporated slash donkeysinc.com, where they went viral in Suite Number 3. I wanna show you all around a little with a great shot of Donkeys Inc. The horsepower of a steam engine with those wooden wheels and all. We can also see a finder or a founder right over here to the right. And, of course, the dragon on the side of their helicopter. It's just there for Shell, of course. All of this built by a population of nobody. Eighteen ninety seven. We only had a 130,000 people here. Could you even imagine 1,800 or 1,700? The streets would be empty. Yet we're told within our mainstream narrative that nobody constructed palace after palace, and we all just accepted it for years. Well, that all ends now. Remember that in 1750, nobody was even here in this location. You can just drop the guy down anywhere in this city. Doesn't matter. You can just throw the guy down in this back alley. You can just swing the camera angle around here, and what do you know? Another old world palace pops up. This is the Epiphany Tower. Just take a look at the brickwork on this one. I wish my town would give me one of these. And remember that all of these buildings are just the top. They're just what we can see. They all, most likely, are all interconnected through underground tunnel networks and structures. We've seen this all over the world. And if they're doing it in Chicago, then you know that they're definitely doing it here. It's incredible. It's palace after palace here. You can even see another one behind it. And this building still has its old world bells. In fact, the bells are in nearly every one of these buildings. And what do you guys think of this thing? The Kazan Family Center slash Viewpoint. Where? That's gotta be renamed. It has all kinds of different statues surrounding it, where we all know that this is just art. There weren't actually dragons and griffins. Wait. Right? And then, of course, there's more art of the mainstream mythical creatures all over this thing. I do believe that this is depicting our past, what used to be here. So this is just one city located within the Republic Of Tatarstan, obviously. There's going to be a lot more that we expose in the upcoming episodes. I feel like this location deserves a lot more attention, including the city of Bulgar. With a population of only 8,000 people. In 2010, they, of course, get a palace, and I'm not making fun of anybody. I never will. I'm just showing how people in this town live today. We build huts in 2024, yet in the same exact town. This is here. The amount of evolving and advancing going on is negative 1,000. We are going backwards. So we have the town right here, and now I'm personally convinced after this that we have found modern day Tartaria, and we are going to expose everything in this region. I'm going to go down this road here, and we can continue back on this location, this region in upcoming episodes. Let me know in the comments if you'd like me to do that because right here, there is a gas station. Can you see what that logo is? Can you see that Tartaria may still be here where it has been hiding in this location and is now ready for us to share it to the world?
Saved - March 21, 2026 at 1:46 PM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

What was the Statue of Liberty actually built to signify? 🤔 https://t.co/MfeqOJzWYh

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a continuation of a theory about a hidden connection between a 1848 statue and the Statue of Liberty in New York City. The core claims are as follows: - The 1848 statue is described as a statue of Lucifer called the “genius of evil,” and the speaker argues there are unmistakable similarities between it and the NYC statue. - A chain attached to the ankle of the figure in the 1848 statue is interpreted as a symbol of imprisonment in the bottomless pit for a thousand years, and the speaker notes a “very similar chain” on the Statue of Liberty. - The faces of the two statues are described as bearing a “very similar resemblance.” - In Lucifer’s hand in the 1848 statue, the speaker notes a “one, two, three, four, five, six, seven point crown,” and then compares this to the Statue of Liberty’s crown, which is described by the speaker as having seven points. - The speaker points out a “fruit” hanging at the bottom of the 1848 statue and claims a similar association with an apple for the Statue of Liberty. - A torch is described as being at the bottom of the statue, and the speaker notes that this torch bears a “very similar resemblance” to Lucifer, the light bearer, who is often depicted with a torch. - The speaker asserts that these similarities—crown points, torch, apple association, chain, and overall imagery—aren’t coincidences and suggests they imply a worship or tribute to fallen angels through familiar symbols. - The video mentions a Vatican telescope being called Lucifer in the context of this claim, framing it as something that “the Vatican would never actually call their telescope Lucifer,” and characterizes the discussion as jokes or entertainment. - The speaker emphasizes that all of this is presented as satire and entertainment for viewers, and explicitly states that the content is “for shits and gigs” and “entertainment purposes only.” Key framing points include: the alleged deliberate parallels between the 1848 Lucifer statue and the Statue of Liberty, the interpretation of shared symbols (chain, crown with seven points, torch, apple), and the concluding note that the material is satire and not a factual accusation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you still trying to figure out who that really is? Even after my first video? My first video where I make a pretty convincing case that this is no coincidence. But if you're still not convinced, hang on to your seats because I got some new information, and it all stems from this beautiful statue constructed in 1848. You see, that statue is actually a statue of Lucifer, and it's called the genius of evil. And when you look closely, there are some pretty unmistakable similarities between this statue and a certain statue in the NYC. Let's start by examining this chain attached to ifer's ankle. Could that be a symbol of being imprisoned in the bottomless pit for a thousand years? And you'd probably have never noticed, but I sure did. A very similar chain attached to that old Statue Of Liberty. And when you look at the faces of those two seemingly unrelated statues, they sure bear an awful similar resemblance. And did you happen to notice what Lucifer was holding in his hand in that statue? A one, two, three, four, five, six, seven point crown? Well, have you ever noticed how many points are in the Statue Of Liberty's crown? And did you happen to notice what type of fruit was hanging out in the bottom of that statue as well? And, well, I really don't have to go here, do I? And although small and at the very bottom of the statue, statue, did you notice this torch laying on the ground? That torch that just also happens to bear a very similar resemblance? That torch that Lucifer, the light bearer, is often depicted with often depicted with right in plain sight. So much in plain sight that you probably look right past it and might even unknowingly be rooting for it. But nah, it's all just a coincidence. They just happen to look alike and have the same pointed crown and the same torch and the same association with an apple and the same chain. Just a big coincidence. Just the way this is all a coincidence too. No one really worships any fallen angels and pays tribute to them through characters that a lot of people look up to. Just like the Vatican would never actually call their telescope Lucifer. It's just all jokes. It's all for fun. It's all entertainment, but stay tuned for some more information on that. But like I said, this was all for shits and gigs for your entertainment because that's all I am, satire and entertainment purposes only.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

The "Satan's Little Season" theory is fascinating. (Video: @MYLUNCHBREAK_) https://t.co/5N6kUif1EE

Saved - March 19, 2026 at 5:08 PM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

The Bolsheviks were everything they told you the Nazis were. https://t.co/Mu4RThNrQt

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the Bolsheviks were as brutal as the Nazis in at least two key ways: they made Christianity illegal and religion illegal, and they also criminalized criticizing the regime. They claim the Bolsheviks destroyed 40,000 churches and tens of millions of Christians, and note that “that’s who we sided with.” They critique how history is framed, saying narratives always start after the most horrific actions and focus on the response to those actions, such as events around October 7, the Warsaw Ghetto, or Russia’s expulsions, rather than addressing why those actions occurred. The speaker contends this approach skews the overall picture. They acknowledge that “The Bolsheviks were unequivocally horrible,” but they argue that people don’t learn about that history. The speaker mentions denial of the Armenian genocide and the Holodomor, suggesting there is a double standard: it is “okay for them to deny the Armenian [Holodomor],” but now, in about 30 countries, people can be arrested or imprisoned over related claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Bolsheviks were everything that they told you the Nazis were. They had already made Christianity illegal. They had made religion illegal. They'd also made it, by the way, illegal to criticize, before they destroyed 40,000 churches and tens of millions of Christians. And the crazy thing is that's who we sided with. I feel like with with they always start the story after they've done the most horrific shit, what the response is to that horrific shit. October 7, the Warsaw Ghettos, they always talk about the response when they get kicked out of all these countries. But, like, why do they get kicked out? They always skip to the part in history where they're being punished for their fucking absurdly ridiculous actions. And it and it skews the whole picture. The Bolsheviks were unequivocally horrible, but you don't learn anything about it. It's okay for them to deny the Armenian the Holdemort, but when it's the Now all of a sudden, in 30 fucking countries, you get arrested, you get thrown in prisons.
Saved - March 18, 2026 at 11:13 PM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

The Bolshevik Revolution: Darkness Descends (Full Documentary) https://t.co/uXLldY3RiY

Video Transcript AI Summary
This transcript threads together personal reflections, historical events, and the human cost of political upheaval across Russia and Ukraine in the early 20th century. Key points include: - A meditation on evil and destruction: questions about the source of great evil, whether darkness exists in us, and whether ruin benefits the earth. - Personal life and engagement: Speaker 1 describes seeing Alex for one hour, the sadness that work imposes on time with Alex, and being indescribably happy with her; Speaker 3 speaks of utter happiness and unity between two mortals; Speaker 1 recalls an engagement day as a hazy, unforgettable moment. - The 1905–1917 revolutionary context and violence: despite peaceful marchers, authorities panicked, backed Cossacks with whips and infantry; a second volley killed hundreds of marchers; radical press attacked the czar’s reputation; a telegram arrives at the palace leading to mourning; January 9 and March 15 dated entries note troops firing in the city, casualties, and political resolve. - Abdication and immediate reactions: Speaker 5’s grandfather reacts to the czar’s abdication for himself and his son Alexis, declaring “Russia is finished.” - Civil war and anti-Bolshevik movements: In the South, a White army forms against Bolsheviks. - The assassination of Nicholas II and family: It is asserted that Goloshokin, head of the Yakaterinburg Soviet, met with Lenin and others in Moscow; the killings were preplanned, with orders from Lenin to hide details; Dzerzhinsky allegedly directed suppression of information in Berlin via Alexander Joffe. The family is moved to a basement, confronted by 11 armed men; accounts describe the executions and the bloodshed. - Brest-Litovsk and territorial losses: The Bolshevik regime signs the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with Germany, renouncing territories gained over three centuries. - Family dislocation and exile: A family member recalls the abdication and exile, the shock and tears, and the sense that “Russia is finished.” - Famine in Ukraine (1931): Survivors recount eviction from homes by activists, resulting seizures and removal of families; women and children forced outside, with pleas to stay; survivors describe slave labor, loss of cultural and religious leaders, and relief efforts by international organizations and churches, though relief was hampered by the Soviet border. - Famine reporting and international response: Duranty, a prominent journalist, is criticized for lying about the famine; despite internal British discussions showing estimates of up to ten million deaths, the New York Times published favorable reports, influencing recognition debates of the Soviet Union. - Personal losses during famine: A spring scene of a dead little sister, mortuary practices with no coffins, and the struggle to bury her; survivors describe eating rotten cabbage, beets, and scraps; some rely on parishioners, railroad workers, neighbors, and even Soviet officials for food; the famine’s human toll includes starving children and widespread death. - Enduring memories of hunger: Descriptions of children with swollen limbs, convulsions, and the grim daily reality of hunger; the narrative closes with a bleak portrait of famine-stricken Ukraine and the resilience of those who endured.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This great evil, where's it come from? How'd it still end of the world? What seed? What root did it grow from? Who's doing this? Who's killing us? Robbing us of life and light. Mocking us with the side of what we might have known. Does our ruin benefit the earth? Does it help the grass to grow, the sun to shine? Is this darkness in you too? Have you passed through this night? Speaker 1: Saw Alex for one hour only. It is sad that my work takes so many hours which I would prefer to spend exclusively with Alex. I am so indescribably happy with her. Speaker 2: Never did I believe there could Speaker 3: be such utter happiness in this world, such a feeling of unity between two mortal beings. Speaker 1: A marvelous, unforgettable day in my life, the day of my engagement to my precious, beloved Alex. Walked around the entire day in a haze, not fully conscious actually of what happened to me. Speaker 3: Despite the peaceful intentions of the marchers, the authorities panicked. To back up the Cossacks with their whips, they called out the infantry with their rifles. The second volley was aimed directly at the marchers. Several 100 were killed. The radical press grabbed the opportunity to blacken the czar's name. Speaker 4: I was at the palace when the telegram arrived. Both Alex and I were with Niki. He turned ash and pale. Alex broke down and sobbed. The whole palace was plunged into mourning that day. Speaker 1: January 9, a distressing day. The troops have been forced to fire at several parts of the city and there are many killed and wounded. Lord, how painful and sad this is. March 15. For the sake of Russia, I decided to take this step. All around me, see treason, cowardice, and deceit. Speaker 5: My grandfather, when he heard that the czar abdicated not only for himself but also for his son, Alexis, he became pale like snow and started having tears and even sobbed and said, well, now Russia is finished. Just like that. Speaker 3: In the South, an anti Bolshevik white army came into being. Speaker 0: Not ones Speaker 6: Russians. Are And only not proof of this. For example, Goloshokin, head of the Yakaterinburg Soviet, went to Moscow twice just before the killings. Twice he was in Moscow for instructions, for meetings with Lenin, Sverdlov, and others. It was all preplanned. The foul act of annihilating Nicholas the second was not accidental. Speaker 3: The local Bolsheviks appeared to have carried out the murders on their own initiative, but it now seems clear that it was on orders from Lenin. Lenin took great care, however, to hide the truth, even from his ambassador to Berlin, Adolf Eofe. Speaker 7: In 1918, when my father was Soviet ambassador in Berlin, he received a communication down the line from Moscow that the former czar Nicholas the second had been shot. He asked, and what about the family? He got no reply, and somehow the question was hushed up. And when Jasinski, head of the secret police passed through Berlin, father leant on him and said, why did you not reply to my queries when everyone was asking me from the Kaiser down? All Alexander's relatives, you know. Dzerzhinsky replied, it was a special order from Lenin. He said, let Joffe be told nothing. It will be easier for him to lie about it there in Berlin. Speaker 3: At 01:30AM on July 17, the family was woken up by Yarovsky and told to prepare to move once again. They were led into a small basement room. There, the 11 prisoners, the family and a small retinue, were suddenly confronted by 11 armed men. There had only been time for incoherent exclamations. Both Yarovsky and one of the guards, Medvedev, recorded in legal depositions their versions of what had happened. Speaker 8: Pavel Midvitek. All the members of the son's family were lying on the floor, very severely wounded. The blood was running in streams. Speaker 9: Yakov Yorovsky. I, myself, killed Nicholas point blank. Speaker 10: The Bolshevik regime then went on to sign the Treaty of Brest Litovsk with Germany and signed away everything that Russia regained for three hundred years. Speaker 11: Yidoslavovudka was seven when her father was exiled. She never saw him again. Speaker 2: In the 1931, they came to evict us from our house. Activists, a group of people, if they could be called people, came into the house, looked over everything, and made us very frightened. Then they said, Get out. This isn't your house anymore. But mother wouldn't leave. At least let us spend the rest of the winter here, she begged. Where can I go with these children and old people? The men picked her up and threw her outside. A militiaman or activist stood in the doorway as a guard. Mother shouted to us, Children, don't leave the house. There were tears and screams. It was frightening. We grabbed hold of the benches in the house, screaming and refusing to let go. Then the men began to take us out one by one. They would throw one of us outside and then another. Thus, they threw us out of the house one by one, all six of us. Speaker 11: The survivors worked as slave labor, producing raw materials for export to the West. This is the end of the line for many of the best farmers and cultural and religious leaders of Ukraine. Half a world away, kinsmen of the phantom victims voice protests and form relief committees. Help is offered from Canada, The United States, Switzerland, France, Belgium. Cardinal Initzer initiates relief in Austria. Metropolitan Sheptitsky in Western Ukraine. But all shipments of food grind to a halt at the Soviet border. The Soviet Red Cross flatly denies the existence of famine. The hands of the international organization are tied. Idealized scenes of work and happy peasant life are the staple diet in Soviet movie theaters as the famine rages Speaker 12: He was not only the greatest liar among the journalists in in Moscow, but he was the greatest lie of any journalist that I ever met in the fifty years of journalism. And we used to wonder whether, in fact, the authorities hadn't got some kind of hold over him because he so utterly played their game. But it didn't worry the New York Times who featured his reports. When it came to the famine, the great famine in Ukraine brought about by that was when his reporting was particularly disgraceful because he denied that there Speaker 13: was any famine. Speaker 11: The Soviets actually grant Duranty permission to tour Ukraine unchaperoned. He reports in The Times that all talk of famine now is ridiculous. Yet documents from the British Foreign Office reveal that in private conversations at the British embassy, Duranty said as many as ten million people had died. Speaker 12: When they were discussing the question of recognizing the Soviet Union, the United States government recognizing the Soviet Union, the articles of Duranty were considered as very valuable evidence on the side of recognition. Speaker 2: In the spring, when my little sister died, the body lay in the house a whole week. We kept it until mother came back from the state farm. People would come to our house and knock on the door every day, asking whether we had any corpses. We'd shout, no, we don't. Then the wagon would continue down the street collecting corpses. When mother came home, we had to bury my sister. How could we bury her? There was nothing for a coffin. We wrapped her in a sheet, placed her on a sled, and took her to the cemetery. We put her between two coffins in a big grave. Coffins were placed on top also. And that's how we buried her. Speaker 14: We survived thanks to parishioners, the railroad employees who had the chance to travel beyond the borders of Ukraine. And we had neighbors, Soviet officials. They always had food. We came through their garbage rotten cabbage and beets, and the scraps of food which they threw away. I am not ashamed to admit it, because it was a matter of survival. I didn't want to die. Speaker 9: The collective farm where my father worked had stood since 1928. It was a good, strong farm. But although this was the best farm around, it was suffering even more than the others. Because they were disciplined and had everything organized on time, while government trucks would pull right up to the winnowing machines and take everything. They even took the child. My father was already swollen. Not too much. But his feet were swollen. And his eyes, all in the typical look of starvation. And in the house, there was nothing left but half a pumpkin. And that's all. I went to the collective farm to get horses. There, a friend of mine from the communist youth league said weekly, I came to take your father away. I'll take him. Maybe he'll survive. Okay. But it's too late for us. Speaker 11: I'm now trying to be immediate. Okay. Village mothers, dying of hunger, throw their children onto trains heading into the Speaker 13: was full of children. Some of them were enormously thin, but other were thin at the top of the body, but their legs were enormously enormously swollen. Swollen. Some of them had convulsions. In general, if a child was lying very quietly, we already knew this child will die soon.
Saved - March 18, 2026 at 7:20 AM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

In 1932, the Jews who made up only 1% of the world's population accounted for 34% of the world's drug peddlers, 47% of robberies, 82% of international crime organizations, and 98% of dealers in prostitution. The most common expressions in the jargon of international gangsters and criminals stem from Hebrew and Yiddish words.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1932, Jews, who made up 1% of the world's population, accounted for 34% of the world's dope peddlers and 47% of robberies. Even on 50%. 47% of cricket games of chance, 82% of international crime organizations, and 98% of dealers in prostitution. The most common expressions in the jargon of international gangsters and criminals stem from Hebrew and Yiddish words.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 1932, the Jews who made up only 1% of the world's population accounted for 34% of the world's dope peddlers and 47% of robberies. Even on 50%. 47% of cricket games of chance, 82% of international crime organizations, and 98% of dealers in prostitution. The most common expressions in the jargon of international gangsters and criminals stem from Hebrew and Yiddish words.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Why does every Hollywood mafia movie focus exclusively on the Italian mafia, but always avoids the fact that (a) The Jewish mob was far more influential and destructive to society, or (b) that the Italian mafia itself was controlled by Jews? ✡️🧐 https://t.co/aHbT8R2ZYU

Saved - March 18, 2026 at 7:19 AM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Why does every Hollywood mafia movie focus exclusively on the Italian mafia, but always avoids the fact that (a) The Jewish mob was far more influential and destructive to society, or (b) that the Italian mafia itself was controlled by Jews? ✡️🧐 https://t.co/aHbT8R2ZYU

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion outlines a close relationship in Los Angeles between Israelis and the Jewish mafia. By 1949, Mickey Cohen’s personal rabbi was Menachem Begin, described as “the father of all terrorism.” The speakers assert that Cohen was the head of the LA mob, noting that while many people think the mafia was Italian, “a lot of the mafia was actually the head mafia bosses were Jewish,” and that “the mob was run by Jews,” with Italians running the local mob and Jews running the large-scale international syndicate. They identify Meyer Lansky as “the primary crime boss” and state he led from 1931 until the end of the 1970s. Lansky allegedly never went to prison, unlike others who did; he ran major blackmail operations, described as “the original Epstein,” and there is an assertion that he had blackmail on J. Edgar Hoover. They quote a sensational line about Hoover: “Hoover sucking what's his name? Sucking on the took by Tolson's dick.” The speakers claim Lansky went on the run in the 1970s when America chased him, went to Israel, and was denied entry, though he was given a travel visa to continue on the run. They admit they are not certain how Lansky’s story ended. The conversation emphasizes the interconnection between the CIA, the mafia, and Israel, stating that this relationship helped produce a broader, intertwined network: “the CIA and the mafia, and the Israelis,” with a claim that Kennedy was killed as a consequence of these relationships. They describe the global “inter interconnected” nature of the teams and suggest that one cannot separate the CIA, the mob, and Israel, pointing to the intersections involving Meyer Lansky.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The relationship in LA particularly then continued to grow between the Israelis and Jewish mafia. The Jewish mafia. Speaker 1: And Israelis. Speaker 0: Right. By 1949, Mickey Cohen's personal rabbi was Menachem Begin, who was the father of all terrorism Speaker 1: in the world. Is Cohen the head of the LA mafia? Yes. Jewish Jewish a lot people think it's Italian, but a lot of the mafia was actually the head mafia bosses were Jewish. Speaker 0: Right. Let me explain something. The mob was run by Jews. It wasn't run by Italians. The Italians ran the local mob and the Jews ran the large scale international syndicate. So the Jewish mob is the mob. Speaker 1: Yeah. The primary crime boss was Meyer Linsky. Correct? Speaker 0: Correct. The primary the mob boss of all time from 1931 till the very end in nineteen seventies was Meyer Linsky. Speaker 1: He never went to prison, although the ones did. No. But he ran I'm sure you know this. He ran big blackmail operations like the the original Epstein. He had blackmail allegedly on AJ Edgar Hoover. Speaker 0: Yeah. Edgar Hoover sucking what's his name? Sucking on the took by Tolson's dick. Speaker 1: Yeah. Isn't this insane? So this Speaker 0: is That's really never come out. That leaked footage has never come out. Crazy, because you know what's happening the world? Speaker 1: He also went to jail. He's only mobster that didn't go to jail. Speaker 0: Well, he went on the run-in the seventies. The America was finally after him and he goes to Israel and he's like, Hey, let me in. And they're like, nah, but they gave him a travel visa. So he was able to continue on the run. And honestly, I couldn't even tell you how the Meyer Lansky story ended up. But that relationship is the relationship that people need to understand because that's the relationship that killed Kennedy. And when you understand the relationship between the CIA and the mafia, it's like, and then you have the the CIA and the Israelis. It's like it's a big all interchanged. Exactly. Speaker 1: So it's a mix between this. That's what I was trying to look at. Know it could be a mix between the CIA, the mob, and Israel. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: You can't separate the team. Inter interconnected. You start realizing, oh, our CIA is connected with the mafia and this. And it's like, it's crazy how you you could see the intersections happen, though, with, like, Meyer
Saved - March 17, 2026 at 3:03 AM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Pornography is strictly forbidden in Israel btw. Only goyim countries are inundated with it, especially the West. Ask yourself why. https://t.co/tR0nDNfc57

Saved - March 5, 2026 at 6:01 AM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

The entire historical narrative behind the U.S. Capitol buildings, who built them, and WHEN they were built, is completely fraudulent. Something BIG is being hidden from us... And when it gets exposed, the entire fake-history matrix will crumble. [🎥 @MYLUNCHBREAK_] https://t.co/KR20Z8KeHs

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses the idea of proving a new civilization within old-world buildings in a single video, noting that capital buildings with different architects shouldn’t look exactly the same. He visits the Texas State Capitol, stating it was made in 1988, largely by convicts or migrant workers, and that it took six years and ten months to build, questioning whether power tools existed in 1885. He then moves to the Mississippi State Capitol, describing a contest in which 14 architects submitted plans and Theodore C. Link of Saint Louis, Missouri won; he suggests the design looks like other capitals. He visits the Arkansas State Capitol and calls the builders “a bunch of prisoners,” then questions whether cars existed for a walking figure in a scene. He shows the Florida State Capitol and notes that “they tore down the original.” At the Minnesota State Capitol, he says there was a competition with 41 submissions but the design looks the same as the others. He covers the Montana State Capitol, explaining there were two competitions in 1896; the winner’s design was deemed too expensive and another competition followed, with Charles Bell winning, though the resulting building allegedly still resembles the others. He notes that Arkansas’s design is allegedly identical to Montana’s, and that a competition for Montana’s design produced a rejected plan that Arkansas supposedly uses as its own. He documents another competition in Utah, describing a lengthy process and a nail-biter vote, after which the resulting Capitol supposedly looks like the others. He asserts the pattern of sameness across these capitols supports a narrative that the structures are manipulated for a consistent appearance. He closes this section urging viewers to subscribe and support the channel. Speaker 3 shifts to a focus on documented records, explaining that the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) should hold construction documents for federal buildings. He states that the National Archives’ master list for the U.S. Capitol Building in Washington, D.C. contains only 10 pages filed in 1935, which is far later than the building’s supposed construction period of 1793–1800. He reports that he emailed NARA to confirm these records and was told that if blueprints are missing from the master list, they are not in NARA’s holdings. He claims this constitutes “the end of the mainstream narrative” and states there is no evidence in the National Archives to prove the original construction. He asserts that adults in classrooms grade children on a story that is “completely fabricated” and that receipts or verification are needed for all stories, calling for an ongoing demand for verification across history and beyond. Speaker 0 continues, signaling that this is the eighth time they have exposed a structure with no documentation for blueprints, ledgers, load-bearing calculations, or other proof of construction. They announce plans to examine Louisville and expand the investigation to more structures, stating that nine structures have no verified documents and that purported scholarly sources admit they do not possess the blueprints. He lists structures including the Cathedral of All Saints, Big Ben, the Field Museum, the Philadelphia City Hall, the New York Public Library, Emmanuel Church in LaGrange, The Federal Hall in New York City, the U.S. Capitol Building, Crescent Hill branch library, and Westminster Presbyterian Church, reiterating the demand for blueprints and construction records. He claims the mainstream history is collapsing and frames this as a worldwide audit, one building at a time, with expectations to reach many more structures. He signs off, inviting viewers to watch more episodes and to provide receipts for the stories presented, and previews future focus on a castle tower in Riverside, Illinois.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can I prove we are a new civilization living among old world buildings in a single video? There's no way that all capital buildings look exactly the same if they all have a different architect. Right? Alright. Here we are at the Texas State Capitol. The Capitol was made in 1988. It was constructed largely by a bunch of convicts or migrant workers. There's a bunch of convicts building this. This only took six years and ten months to build. This only took six years and ten months to build. Did they have power tools in 1885? No. They did not. That didn't come until 1895. So ten years before the power tool, they were able to construct this, with convicts. Yeah. Give me a break. Alright. So here we are with the Mississippi State Capitol, and the history of it says that there were 14 architects that submitted plans in response to the architectural context and advertised through newspapers. Okay. So there was a contest to see who would make sure that this thing was gonna get built. And a bunch of architects, 14 of them, submitted plans. And, of course, I picked the winner, and they chose Theodore c Link of Saint Louis, Missouri. He won the contest. Obviously, this is gonna look different than all the other ones because it's a contest. Right? So let's take a look at it. Of course, it will. Let's reveal what it looks like. Oh, no. It's exactly the same. I don't know how that works, but he we run a contest with 14 people, and this guy just draws up this exact same structure that we're looking at all over The United States. Speaker 1: Okay. Here we are with the Arkansas State Capitol. And let's see who built this. Oh, it was a bunch of prisoners. Prisoners know how to build Tartarian buildings, I guess. Yeah. Speaker 0: Why is this lady walking home? Why didn't she just take her car home? She's got this amazing building. Surely, they have cars. Oh, okay. I guess they don't. Speaker 2: Okay. So here we are at the Florida State Capitol. And let's scroll in and up. There it is. Yep. They tore down the original. Speaker 1: Okay. So here we are at the Minnesota State Capitol. They had a competition. There was 41 people that submitted their design, and I don't know why they have 41 people submitting a design when they're all exactly the same. So let's see if it's any different. And no. It's exactly the same as all the other ones. Speaker 2: The Montana State Capitol. And in this one, they had two competitions. Okay. Right off the bat. A design competition for a building that was conduct conducted in 1896. So they wanted to do a competition. The winner was this guy. He won. A year later, they said that too much money. Yeah. So they're gonna do another competition, of course. So they have two competitions to find out who's gonna do this. The second one was won by Charles Bell. I wonder if they built anything different than all the other state capitals. I wonder why it would matter whether this guy won or this guy. Does it matter? Because they all look exactly the same. Here's a picture of the winning competition design. Okay. And there's the picture of it. So it looks exactly like all of the other ones. So this guy's design, George Mann, didn't win, but Arkansas is allowing him to use his design down here. So Arkansas and Montana better not look exactly the same. Let's see. Here's Montana. Let's see Arkansas. Oh, it is literally identical. Oh, here's the competition. Another competition to see who was gonna design this thing. It was rejected and another contest was started. Why do you need competitions if they all look the same? Let's see how it looks. I'm sure it'll look a little bit different. Oh, same thing. And the Utah scriptwriter got a little carried away, in my opinion. This is the best of them all. Supposedly, they had 24 architecture firms compete to see who was gonna be the best design and the winner. Some firms didn't want to compete because the pay wasn't high enough. So then it was down to the final eight firms. Utah gave them five months to get these designs turned in. After a bunch of nonsense, which you can read here for yourself, they finally got it down to the final two, or you could say the championship. The committee finally took a vote and picked someone by a nail biter, four to three in the votes. And amazing. Just amazing. Nail biter. I think sounds like the storyteller might have been drinking that night and been laughing having us read this. Okay. So after all of this, the Capitol Building better freaking look like something better than all the other ones. Alright. Let's take a look at it. Oh, there it is. Oh, looks exactly the freaking same as all the other ones. Now in my opinion, these buildings are all too important to the controllers to knock down, so they have to simply keep them. They have to add them to the narrative and pretend like they were just built. And I hope you guys enjoyed it. Subscribe, like, and comment below. I will be posting a lot more. I appreciate all the love, and I hope you guys have a great day. See you. Speaker 3: The National Archives of the United States of America or NARA. This is the place that should hold the original construction documents. For every single federal building, they shared the master list with us. And we showed that the US Capitol Building, one of the most important structures in American history, They only hold 10 pages, and they were filed in 1935, a hundred and thirty five years after it was supposedly constructed. So I went further, and I emailed Nara. I wanted them to confirm that what we see in the master list is actually true. Because if they don't have any records, no blueprints from The United States Capitol Building, a palace from 1800 within the National Archives database, then I believe this has to be the most shocking evidence to this point, understanding that the country's foundation is undocumented. This is the single most important political structure within The United States Of America. It's the heart of the American government. This is the place where congress meets, where laws are created, where presidents are inaugurated. So when I send the email to the National Archives asking them about their master list, telling them that I came across the United States Capitol Building, Washington DC, understanding that we've all been lied to, that its original construction was from 1793 to 1800. I pointed out that their blueprints, their construction records, the ledgers, all of the documents that they would have needed to build this thing, they are all missing, and that there are only 10 pages logged from 1935. I wanted them to clarify that this was everything that they had, and there wasn't anything missing in the back or that they didn't get around to yet like the New York Public Library like we just saw. And this is when they replied back to me and my team stating, yes. If it is missing from the master list, then we do not have it in our holdings. And this is the end of the mainstream narrative. There's no coming back. It is done, and it's shocking. We have confirmation that they don't have any evidence at all that their narrative about the construction of The United States Capitol Building from 1793 to 1800 is actually true at all. There's nothing cataloged. There's nothing documented. Zero evidence. And at this point, I don't have any respect for an adult that sits in a classroom and grades children on a story that is completely fabricated. And the reason is because the adult did zero research on their own to ever even verify whether this story that they grade all these kids on was even true to begin with. They just blindly accepted all of this information and never actually asked for verification, and then they grade these children on it. And I believe that this thought process is all done. It's time for everybody to understand that we need to ask for receipts for all of these stupid stories, and it doesn't stop there. This is for everything. This is not just for history. This is a thought process, and it's universal in life. We all need to ask for verification on everything that we're told. I'm not gonna stop. I'm coming after their story hour. I'm going to ruin their favorite chapters. This is the eighth time now that we have exposed a structure where they admit to the world that they do not have the original blueprints. They don't have the blueprints, and they also don't have the ledgers. They don't have the load bearing calculations. They have nothing. We have pulled FOIAs. We've talked to government employees, and they've admitted it all right here on this channel. And now all of us know that The United States Capitol Building, according to the National Archives, does not have a single document proving that they actually constructed this building. NARA isn't just an archive. It's not just a library. NARA exists specifically to preserve the original documents that would prove the federal government's history, their actions, their construction, laws, and operations. This includes the following, federal building contracts, federal construction blueprints, engineering reports, architectural plans, presidential records, congressional records, maps, surveys, ledgers, correspondence, and all federal documents created by agencies and departments where the US Capitol Building, it obviously falls into all of this. And we've been asking for the blueprints, and that's when we found NARA. And NARA doesn't have a single document. So let's go further. Every single federal building built before 1934 was 100% required to transfer all their records to the National Archives when Nara was created. If the records ever existed, Nara would have inherited them. And the fact that they don't have these records means that they were never created. They were never kept. Or just like we've said for so many years, the entire time and this is what I believe to be true. This building was found and predates the official narrative and their narrative is a complete lie. The stage is set and I'm going to show you how it's not just eight buildings. It's not just the United States Capitol Building. We're gonna go to Louisville, Kentucky and take this whole thing even further. Welcome to episode 160 of my lunch break. I hope you're all having a great day. And if you're new, welcome. Structures, such as the Field Museum in Chicago, the Philadelphia City Hall, and the US Capitol Building, all of them hold zero documented construction records. I can also show you that this goes so much further than that. And there was a civilization here before all of us that was advanced. This civilization that was here was not riding around on horses and donkeys. They weren't suffering in winters, and they had technology. And they lived right here where we are today, where we find their buildings all over the place. And we use all of them right now. This one being the Crescent Hill Branch Library located in Louisville, Kentucky. I just want one blueprint with the load bearing calculations. I want a building that looks incredible that has columns and was supposedly built in the eighteen hundreds. Even the early nineteen hundreds would be fine. I want them to actually provide us with the proof that we all know would have been required. This is impossible to not have a single document for any of these structures if they actually built them. We have so many architects, people that work inside buildings, people that construct buildings for their living, emailing us, contacting us, telling us impossible to not have one document. And remember, this is not thousands of years ago. This is the eighteen and nineteen hundreds. They weren't just over there eyeballing 600,000 tons of stone. Just over there guessing how many donkeys would pull the stone to the site. All undocumented. There's no ledgers. There's no record of how much things costed. There's nothing. And this is impossible if they actually constructed it. There had to be load tables, stress diagrams, engineering calculations, thickness measurements, material ledgers, like how many chisels they had. They didn't even have a power tool, remember. Geological surveys. It's literally impossible to build a palace with none of this, and we've seen this every single time. So I've submitted a form to the Crescent Hill Library, Louisville, Europe, Australia, and the rest, you are not off the hook. I'm coming after you two. I want the blueprints. I've asked these guys for the blueprints. I've asked them for the original drawings to their building that we are all told was constructed in just one year. One year in nineteen o eight. This is not even close to possible. It's crazy. We are all told that Thomas and Bone was the architect firm behind this palace library. And this is when they replied back to me saying that they've checked with their construction manager, and he does not believe that they have the original construction drawings or load bearing calculations for Crescent Hill, officially making this the ninth structure that is totally unverified and has zero documents on how it actually got there. There's again no proof. There is no proof. Zero that it was actually constructed in a single year. So I emailed back and said, just so I'm understanding correctly, you're saying that the original blueprints, the original load bearing calculations are not in your possession. Remember, this is a library, and they don't even have their own records from, like, a hundred and twenty years ago. And that alone should tell you everything you need to know. They also told me that I could go put in an open records request, and they would even be happy to do that for us. I said, sure. Let's do it. I also wanted to clarify just so I was understanding correctly that they're saying that they don't have the original blueprints and the load bearing calculations for the Crescent Hill, and they're not in their possession. And they replied back to me saying, yes. That's what we're told. No blueprints, no load bearing calculations, which is just unbelievable. I went ahead and just filled out this form that they gave me. This individual wanted my address, which I'm not giving it to this person. And when I entered my address in, they denied my request because I'm not a Kentucky resident. So I just asked her to do it since we're just requesting information from this website. And here's the link if anybody's watching from Kentucky and wants to submit a request for these original blueprints because the library, they replied back to me saying, I'm afraid I can't do that. They have a residency rule for a reason, and that would not be appropriate. Really, it wouldn't be appropriate for the library to want to get their own original blueprints. You have got to be kidding me. You should want your blueprints from the Louisville Metro government saying, I'm sorry I can't be of more assistance. It's ridiculous. Especially because in nineteen o eight, the Louisville Metro didn't even exist. So the library would have had to transfer these documents over to them in 2003. And if they don't have them, then we can skip the Louisville Metro government. They're not gonna have them either. So I replied back to her saying, based on your message and the construction manager's input, it sounds like the Louisville Free Public Library doesn't have its own original blueprints or load bearing calculations documented for the Crescent Hill branch. And I'll note that from my research that the originals are not held in the library's possession. And they emailed us back saying, sounds accurate. And so now they know that they don't have their own original documents, and they also admitted it to the world. And we are getting a complete confirmation that the story that we've all been told are complete lies and all unverified information. This building's construction being built in a year in nineteen o eight, is completely unverified now. We want a single blueprint. I want one of them. I wanna show you all how incredible Donkeys Incorporated was. I wanna show you how they chiseled palaces in the dark. How they suffered in winters, but could knock out a palace in no time. Twelve months or less, perfectly. I wanna show you the tunnels that are in zero stories. Yet we know the tunnels are all there connecting to all the other old world buildings in the area. I want a single ledger. Just one, proving that they bought 50 chisels with taxpayer money. Donkeys Incorporated, you undocumented, and it's unbelievable. Thank you to all of our badge members, all of our Patreons, and every single subscriber. You're all awesome, taxpayer and I thank you all a lot. We are on YouTube, Rumble, X, Instagram, TikTok, BitShoot, and Spotify, if you're looking for even more content from us. We're also on eBay now, where I'm putting the episodes on there if you'd like a physical archive. We're also selling cool items. Somebody just bought the first episode's thumbnail, a one of one signed limited episode specific artifact. I'm gonna be doing this for every episode, and each sale helps this channel so much. I'm gonna be putting all the money right back into this channel, and I thank you all so much for your support. While there was a 1988 renovation project, which we all know that we like to call the restoration projects destruction projects because these old world buildings do not need our help, and we all know it. The library materials were all stored and kept safe at the Masonic home. Very nice of them. We have a verified paper trail that nine structures structures that clearly, just from looking at them, do not belong in our timeline, and we now have verification. From supposedly scholarly sources, the people that should actually have the blueprints, they do not have them. They have nothing. And it's not just the blueprints. They literally have nothing. Zero pieces of paper to provide us to prove that their story is actually true. We've covered the US Capitol Building. We've showed that the Crescent Hill branch library has no documents. And now we're going to go to Minneapolis, Minnesota where they have the Westminster Presbyterian Church that was supposedly built in 1897. And it wasn't even the first church on the site. Apparently, the first church was from 1860, and it was outgrown. And they built another one in 1883 where this second church, twelve years after opening, was heavily damaged by a fire. So we get the nod. We all know that this is a place that we definitely need to email and ask for the blueprints because I don't believe they have them at all. A fire ripped the second church to the ground in 1895 and broke ground in 1896. One year later, opening its doors in 1897. One year after that. In the eighteen hundreds, this is unbelievable. So let's email the PTCA or the presbytery of the Twin Cities area, the group responsible for overseeing the Westminster Presbyterian Church. They handled church administration, records, and governance. They are the organization above the church that holds the records. Going further, the PTCA would definitely know if the records were archived, if they were transferred, if they were lost, or never existed at all. So we emailed them, asking them for the original blueprints, the construction drawings for the church in Minneapolis, the one that's there today from 1897, and we asked them to please confirm whether their office holds these records. And we got an email back from the office administrator to the PTCA stating, hello. We do not hold these records. Again, they should without a doubt have them. They should have something. But time and time again, they have nothing. Their story about these fires, building things in one year, the multiple churches before it, the architects. These guys might have been real people, but they were not drawing load bearing calculations. They were not winning contests. They were not constructing anything in my opinion, and their story is ruined. They have lied to us for too long, and we are all done with their fake stories. We want the truth. I love seeing them admit that they don't have these records because every time it gets more and more shocking. I told you that they're not gonna have these blueprints, and we have exposed the Cathedral Of All Saints, Big Ben, the Field Museum, the Philadelphia City Hall, the New York Public Library, Emmanuel Church in LaGrange, Illinois, the Federal Hall in New York City, The US Capitol Building, Crescent Hill branch library, and the Westminster Presbyterian Church. I just want the blueprints. I want the construction records. I wanna see the verification that their story is true, yet the mainstream history is 10 for 10, exposing themselves that they can't provide any documentation to us. And every single time that they do this, they are being exposed more and more, showing all of us that they never had these records, and they just made up these stories based on nothing. 10 for 10, and just wait till we get to 20. Wait till we get to 50. 500 structures all over the world that just can't seem to locate their buildings load bearing calculations. No idea how their structure was ever approved by the city, and they have no idea how their building even got there. We are conducting a worldwide audit, one building at a time. The mainstream history is collapsing. We've dragged it right into the deep end by simply asking questions. We want the evidence. We want the truth. We want disclaimers stating that their stupid stories are unverified. We're not even close to done. I want to know how this castle tower located in Riverside, Illinois got there. We wanna see some documentation.
Saved - February 28, 2026 at 12:20 AM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Is the Globe Earth Theory a Lie? @holisticnut33 explores: https://t.co/ONDp107h1T

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a deep-dive critique of globe Earth claims, arguing there is legitimacy to a flat-Earth view. He starts by examining NASA’s most recent globe image from outer space, noting stars in the background and claiming the picture is from twenty-something years ago, and comparing two NASA globe images showing the United States at different sizes “in the very next year,” questioning how that is possible. He asserts the globe image has “copied and pasted clouds” and asks if the globe was made in Photoshop. He then discusses a moon picture with the earth behind it, urging attention to the sides and asking how the earth could be drastically smaller when observed from the moon, yet drastically larger when you’re about 50,000 miles away from the moon. He claims that, when put into context, “they’re completely lying to our faces,” and describes the lunar module as looking “absolutely ridiculous,” calling it a replica and a toy, and questions whether the buttons have real functions and why ten thousand buttons would be needed. He questions who recorded the lunar module launch, noting that there were no fully autonomous cameras or drones at the time, and asks “Who got left on the moon?” He asserts that the moon landing was implanted as a false reality on the subconscious mind to govern conscious behaviors, linking Apollo 11 to symbolic numerology (11) and stating that the moon and sun are symbolic pillars representing subconscious and conscious realms. He claims the moon landing was a symbolic act to capture imagination and limit consciousness. He asks if the Earth were a globe, one would have to sit at eye level with water to have a perfectly flat horizon, implying a flat horizon because Chicago’s skyline is visible from about 40 miles across Lake Michigan. He states that curvature would be eight inches per mile squared, so buildings would have to be level with the floor and would appear to lean if the Earth were globe. He claims there is no detectable curvature on any body of water, and that the horizon is merely how far the eye can see. Regarding circumnavigation, he asserts there is no proof of east-to-west circumnavigation but no evidence of north-to-south circumnavigation, arguing that north is the center on a flat map and that circumnavigating north to south would leave the magnetic field. He mentions Antarctica’s average elevation and its role in “holding all of the waters in,” and notes no country has a flag shape for its nation, while Antarctica does. He calls attention to the Antarctic Treaty and contrasts it with Greenland, and mentions crepuscular rays as evidence of a local sun, and claims that if the sun were 93 million miles away, light rays would be perfectly parallel and seasons would be explained differently. He claims the moon gives off its own light, with a few degrees colder Fahrenheit than the surrounding atmosphere, which would not be possible if the moon merely reflects the sun’s light. He references a model visually and asserts that what is shown makes no sense if the Earth is a globe. He concludes by saying the video is “the tip of the iceberg,” asserting that observing no curvature and the sun and moon appearing the same size and moving across the sky might reflect what’s actually happening. He ends with, “But of course, the earth is a globe and I made everything up,” and states, “This video was for entertainment purposes only.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So why do I actually think that the earth is flat? Am I just making a bunch of stuff up just to get your attention and get views? Or is there legitimacy to what I'm saying? So why don't we take a real deep dive into the situation? So this is supposedly the most recent picture of the globe from outer space. Notice how they have stars in the background for once. That's pretty nice. But this is a picture of the globe from, I'm not sure, like twenty something years ago. Look at the size of The US. Now look at the size of The US of the picture of the globe the very next year. Both were taken by NASA. The United States is literally twice the size in the picture previous. How is that even possible? And then if you look at the picture of the globe, it has copied and pasted clouds. So was the globe made in Photoshop? Yeah. It literally was. And then we have this picture of the moon. Apparently, that's the dark side of the moon and then the earth behind it. Now pay attention to the sides. This is a picture of the earth from the moon being on the moon. So how's the earth drastically smaller when you're on the moon? But if you're like 50,000 miles away from the moon, then the Earth is drastically larger. You see, when you really try to put all of this into context, you understand that they're completely lying to our faces. And it's so unbelievably obvious. Now, the lunar module looks absolutely ridiculous. And here's a replica of someone looking around inside a lunar module. A replica replica lunar module. It looks ridiculous. It looks like a kid's toy. You really mean to tell me that those buttons have like real things that they do? They need 10,000 buttons to do something like this? And it's really crazy because not only does this look extremely fake of the lunar module blasting off from the moon, but who was recording the lunar module taking off? We didn't have fully autonomous cameras and drones like we do today. So who was recording it? Who got left on the moon? This is what I'm saying. All you have to do is use your mind. But the thing is they implanted this false reality on your subconscious mind. Why do you think they call it Apollo 11? Well, 11 in numerology is very very symbolic. You know, like the twin towers, the two pillars. It's symbolic for whatever happens in the material world. One pillar, will happen in the non material, the subconscious world, the other pillar. So whatever happens in the internal is reflected in the external. Whatever happens in the external is reflected in the internal. Well, the moon is on one pillar and the sun is on the other. The sun rules the conscious masculine. The moon rules the subconscious and feminine. So symbolically speaking, the US government implanted their own reality into your subconscious mind, so that they can govern and control and manipulate your conscious behaviors. That's why they did the moon landing. It's all symbolic for capturing your imagination, capturing your mind, and limiting your ability to expand your consciousness. If the Earth is a globe, then you would literally have to be at eye level, sitting at eye level with the water in order to have a perfectly flat horizon, which means that you wouldn't be able to see the Chicago skyline, which I just showed you from roughly 40 miles away across Lake Michigan. It would be under eight inches per eight inches per mile squared of curvature, which means that every mile, would be exponentially curving more. And if we were on a globe and we were constructing buildings on a globe, then the buildings would have to be level with the floor beneath it. Well, if we're on a globe, it's constantly curving like this. So the buildings across the water, they would also be leaning back if you were able to see them at all. Are you keeping up with what I'm saying here? There's no possible way that the Earth could be a globe if there's no detectable curvature on any body of water ever, and there's no detectable curvature no matter how high we go. The horizon is not a physical horizon. It is literally just how far our eyes can see. And how come we've had so many people circumnavigate the globe east to west, but we don't have any proof, any evidence, no success when it comes to circumnavigating the globe north to south? Well, that's because it's literally impossible. You would have to be flying over Antarctica. Well, no one can go to Antarctica, first of all. But second of all, you would just be leaving the magnetic field. Because on a flat earth model, north is the center. So if you're circumnavigating east to west, you're just going in circles. And that's what the word circumnavigation means. So you can't circumnavigate north to south because north is the center, south is leaving the magnetic field on the flat plane that we're on, and beyond the Arctic Circle or the Antarctic Circle or the ice wall, whatever you wanna call it, beyond that, who knows what's beyond? It. But I do know that Antarctica has an average elevation of over 8,000 feet above sea level. It's literally holding all of the waters in. And what's really weird is no country, no nation on earth has a picture of the shape of the country or nation as its flag, but Antarctica does. And of all the treaties that have been broken throughout human history, the Antarctic treaty is the most important one that every government around the world just unanimously agrees on. We have that whole thing going on with Greenland. Why not Antarctica? Weird. And you've seen crepuscular light rays. Right? Where it literally looks like the sun's light is like peeking through the clouds at this specific angle. Well, means that the sun is literally small and local, much smaller than the earth and moving overhead. Because if we had a sun that was 93,000,000 miles away, all of the light rays coming to Earth would be perfectly parallel. And that very small difference with the Earth's wobble would not cause the seasons. And then if you look at the moon, it's clearly giving off its own light source. There's no possible way that it could be waxing and waning in a twenty eight day cycle, and the moon's light could be a few degrees colder Fahrenheit on average than the atmosphere around it. Meaning the moon is giving off its own source of cold light. There's no possible way that that would be happening if we were on a globe and the moon was a rock reflecting the sun's light. Like this model right here makes literally no sense. All you have to do is investigate. So this is just the tip of the iceberg, guys. I just gave you all the tip of the iceberg. But if you can observe that there's no curvature and that the sun and moon appear to be the same size and they appear to be moving across the sky, then that's probably what they're doing, guys. That's probably the thing that's actually happening. But of course, the earth is a globe and I made everything up. This video was for entertainment purposes only.
Saved - February 23, 2026 at 11:50 PM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

The "Satan's Little Season" theory is fascinating. (Video: @MYLUNCHBREAK_) https://t.co/5N6kUif1EE

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers argue that humanity is currently living through the “little season” described in prophetic scripture, a period of grand deception that began after Satan was released from the pit following a thousand years of imprisonment, during which “truth was established” and global deception paused. They maintain this is not optional; deception now targets governments, religious systems, media, education, and the population’s morals, and Satan has been loosed to test who will follow God and who will not. Key points include: - The little season is a real, ongoing phase in which deception is worldwide. Satan is not bound; his release marks a final test. - During the thousand-year imprisonment, truth prevailed and a pause in global deception occurred; the old world with palaces, cathedrals, and knowledge existed, while today’s world is marked by confusion, misdirection, and widespread deception. - Contemporary signs cited as evidence of the little season include broken families, persistent war, division along race, class, gender, and politics, cultural chaos, addiction, and a general lack of justice; research into truth is often labeled conspiracy theory. - The prophecy states that after the little season, Satan will deceive the nations once more and gather them to battle Gog and Magog, aiming to form a one-world government while surrounding the saints in the beloved city. - Judgment day follows; saints are gathered and saved in the beloved city, which may mean some true saints are living unknowingly among us. Books are opened, including the Book of Life, and the dead are judged by deeds written in the books. - Those not found in the Book of Life are cast into the lake of fire; there is no argument and no second chance. The final division is between eternal life in the new heaven and new earth with God versus eternal punishment for the wicked. - Post-little season, a new heaven and a new earth will exist where God dwells with His people forever; there will be no more sin, pain, or death, and Satan will never return. - The speakers claim this timeline is universal across cultures and religions, with the same pattern: a time of peace, a season of deception, a final battle, judgment, and then a transformed world. - They emphasize that this interpretation is their view and invite others to examine the information themselves, noting there are no coincidences and urging people to wake up to the deception and choose their path. - They describe the current era as an enemy-ruled battlefield for souls and affirm that the time to act is now, as the little season appears to be unfolding in real time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: After that, he must be loosed a little season. What if I told you that we are living today, right now, in the little season? What if I told you that what was told to us makes so much more sense than what we could have ever imagined? What if I told you that yesterday was the final day that all of us didn't understand revelation, that he should deceive the nations no more until the thousand years should be fulfilled? And after that, Satan must be loosed. A little season, and this is not optional. We are told that he should deceive the nations no more until the thousand years should be fulfilled. There is deception like you wouldn't believe right now, and we all know it. On a grand scale, this means that he is not bound. He is not chained to that pit, and he is loosed. Where his goal is to deceive the nations, including governments, religious systems, media, education, and the population's morals. I do believe that Satan has been loosed, and he is the final tool to see who will follow God and who will not. Who will find the truth? This is the final test. Before he was chained to the pit for one thousand years, he had full freedom to deceive, manipulate, and influence the kingdoms of the world. This is confirmed multiple times in the Bible. And then he was chained for a thousand years in the pit. And what happened in these thousand years? Satan was imprisoned. Truth was established. Global scale deception was paused where you see everything they left behind in my opinion. This pause, this is the old world. A time of peace, knowledge and truth, star forts, cathedrals, palaces. These were all created, and Satan couldn't stop it. Where today, we are given the basic box style. The vinyl siding on our houses that fall off after three years or if the wind blows. Today, most people don't know who they are. There's total confusion, misdirection, deception. Researching and finding the truth is labeled as a conspiracy theorist. All time highs right now for these three mental illnesses and so many other things, including this word, where algos are detecting words all the time. All of these signs today, they clearly point to a little season of deception where we have broken families all over the place. It is one of the best ways to destroy brand new people. You separate them from their families. We see war all the time. We see it right now. Division through race, class, gender, and politics, staged chaos, we have people constantly chasing virtual approval rather than eternal truth, addiction, and, of course, we all know it. There is no justice. So let's go back and read this once again. Where I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key to the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand and bound Satan for 1,000, casting him into the bottomless pit where he should deceive the nations no more until the thousand years be fulfilled. And after that thousand years, he will be loosed, a little season. This means deception at all, he is here. And what happens after the little season? This just takes everything to a whole new level. Where if you were born during this little season, I believe, in my opinion, you were born to face it. And we're just getting started today. Welcome to episode 134 of my lunch break. I hope you're all having a great day. And if you're new, welcome. I wanna thank all of our sponsors over on Patreon. Thank you to flatearthdave.com. You can check out his app, the flat earth sun, moon, and zodiac app. I'll put the link right in the description, and you can use my referral code MLB. If you click the Tartaria button, you'll see the my lunch break playlist right here. The app is awesome. Thank you to Rebecca Kay, David and Sherry Ferguson, Chuck Templeton, Joy Lee, Stephanie Nolan, the Burlesons, Suez KC, Edwin Rice, Charles Kruger, Dan Woodall, Dale, DJ Click Track, Jacob Law, Jim Ribley and Christine Duggan, Kyle Glascock, pktfnews.org, Ben Drizanal, Natalie Shippenoff, Melissa Edgar, Biggles, Clayton Lamar, Wiltas Homestead, John Adams, Robert the Arnolds, Attila Power, Forbidden Gecko Love, Justin Grobner Grub, Leah Strong, Dakota Dunn, Jason Hockburn, Marie C, Michael Dingyu, Patriot Armory, Tom O'Hara, c three s c o b, Jeffrey Temple, sonyadane.com, James Alvin, Baksui, Jason Press, Suki Warrior, We The People, Migs, Mark Chapman, Muji and Declan, Ariana Oates, Nathan Berbaugh, Ski, Beacon of Truth, Liberty's Arborist, Thomas Thorpe Peterson, Zinger Coffee and Tea, evelynmcgregor.com, Emily Maryland, Curious Cat, Mike D, etcetera, Dan McGee, Laurie Hedvig Johnson, Ellie Annie, Seth Crago, Glenn Gunderson, Mousey's Mouse Cheese Records, Robert's Brain Is Gone, Extreme Reality Check, Late for dinner. Iolo Goncalves, Blake, Rick Tapke, William Richard Jeffries of fifth, Dax, Bill, Chuck, and Son, Dylan Mugenburg, Leonard Insulaco, Robert Petro, Cats Hill, Susie Q, Yark one forty three, Kitty Kitties, GOL, Penn Patriot, Doc Halo, Kenneth Putt, Brenna Fernandez, Paraduction, Necrodemonics, A and W Kerrigan, Tim Skin, Rod Wah, Quidus of Peas, Corbin Mechanical, Buck, VKH Bonner, breaking Bigfoot, Rideon and the residuals, Road Warrior, Bruce Latour, Anna Marley and Nunzio, Codren, David and Irene, Al Pizano, Ivan Apocaly, Ardra Rogers, Brazawea, Carmen Walker, Ivan Apocaly, Papa one, Kinda Classy, Kinda Chola, Maybell, Winnie Set a Compass Upon the Face of the Death, Laurel L. Burnett, Poppy Johns, DJ Sofa King and Jen Hollywood, Summer Chambers, Dee Woods, John and Carlo, Timber Traveler, Bill, Vince Moreno, Flatter Thurbs, The Lady Lacey Show, Michael Dingyu, Jennica Joyce, Ernie Ho, Usi, Shibba Shaba in the darkness. You guys are all awesome and helping this channel out a lot. So what happens after the little season? What should we do right now? When the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, and he shall go out to deceive the nations, which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle, gathering all of the nations together to form a one world government while also creating deception. We've all seen a mass event where every single country, they all came together within the last few years. We all know it. We all just went through it. And we saw how they all operated. We watched, and none of them battled against it. They all worked together, so they've been exposed. These nations all coming together to go to the beloved city where the saints live, and this is the moment, the exact moment that God decides that the little season is over. And this is when he saves the saints where they live in the beloved city. And they don't go to the city until right before judgment day. They are gathered there in the beloved city, and it happens fast. Right at the end, while the little season's happening, these saints, they don't even know that they are the saints until they are gathered and have already been chosen by God. This means that the saints that Satan and all of the nations wanna surround in the beloved city, these saints, they just might be living among us right now and are completely unaware of who they really are and what they have been chosen to be and who doesn't like them at all. And then what comes next after judgment day, where god comes back and the books were open and another book was opened, which is the book of life. And the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books. According to their works, this is not about religion. This is about reality. You're either deceived or you are awake and searching for the truth. After the little season comes judgment day, and whoever was not found written in the book of life is now cast into the lake of fire. There is no argument. There is no second chance. The little season right now, in my opinion, is the test. It is the final test to see who's going into the lake of fire with Satan. Or if your name's in the book of life, you enter eternal life in the new heaven and new earth where God dwells with his people forever. There are two options after the little season's over. And if we are in it right now, which I do believe we are, it's the final test. We're currently living in the final test where God shall wipe all of their tears from their eyes, and there shall be no more death, no more sorrow, no more crying, and no more pain. The little season will be done. It will end. Those that have died, those that are alive, they will all meet back up, and they will all be there for judgment. So what exactly will people be judged on? They'll be judged on every secret thing, whether it be good or whether it be evil. Every work will be brought to judgment. What did you do with your time? What did you do with your body? But what if none of us knew that it was the little season and you were deceived? Confess. You will no longer be judged by your past. You are judged by what you do now. If you're still breathing, you still have time. He is no longer chained, and we're shown this on the Statue Of Liberty where the chains are off. Speaker 1: Earth Speaker 0: is a battlefield right now. A war is being fought as we speak, and it's all over our souls. And it's a place where we're all tested. Again, as I always say, this is all in my opinion, and you're free to think whatever you'd like. This is a blaring truth at this point, and I believe it explains the old world without a doubt. I believe that was the 1,000 where all of the deception was put on pause, all of the wars and the rest. And if I don't share this information with you all at the very minimum and allow you to process it and think about it, and then what am I doing here? I don't think a single person would want me to be withholding or hiding information from you that I feel is extremely valuable. I believe that would then make me accountable. The lake of fire or the book of life, That day, I believe, is coming. And when it's coming is all up to God. And when Satan and all of the nations decide to surround the saints. When this happens, judgment day will come. And Satan will be casted into the lake of fire, and he shall be tormented day and night forever and ever, and he will never come back. And this is the final time that the earth will be deceived, and we are being deceived, in my opinion, on a grand scale. Speaker 1: The the tools in my in our book Speaker 0: And why is this not online? Speaker 1: Whatever book is in my life. It's in my book. Speaker 0: Rebbe, why aren't these tools online? That's all I'm asking. Speaker 1: I ask the people online, but they are in remains in my book. Are they in a museum somewhere? Speaker 0: Mass deception. If there was no deception going on at all, we would all know it. We know there is an overwhelming amount of deception going on. Truth is looked at as being crazy, and that is the clearest giveaway. Division, separation, depression, anxiety, suffering, you name it. This is all evidence because none of this happens in a time of peace and prosperity. But that time is coming. And according to what we are told, judgment is coming for every single person that has ever lived here or is living right now. There will be one final meeting for everybody, and this is the final test for humans. There will not be another one. There will not be a second or third chance. This is the test today, right now, this time period that we're living in. This is a time where we are being tested. When times are hard, how do you respond? What choices do you make in your time here? And before we go on, let's take a minute and thank all of our badge members, all of our Patreons, and every single subscriber. You are all the reason that I'm able to create episodes and share information in so many countries that have ears to hear. Every single week, I'm so thankful for all of you. And thank you for liking the episodes. This helps share the information with so many more people that have never heard of this or maybe never would have. We are on YouTube, Rumble, X, Instagram, TikTok, and Spotify, if you're looking for even more content from us. After the little season, after judgment day, after everything is said and done, what happens? A new heaven and a new earth are formed. The saints will live with God forever. There will be eternal peace, and all of that replaces this battlefield that we live on today. There will be no more sin, no more pain, and no more death. God will live with the people that he had written in the book of life. He lives with them face to face forever, and Satan never returns. And none of this is happening today, which shows that we are not there yet. This is not a past tense story. This is still to come. The test ends for humans after judgment day. The deception ends. The pain and suffering is over. And the kingdom begins, and it never ends. And this is not the only religion in the world that says that this is gonna happen. Different words, different cultures, the exact same patterns where there is a time of peace, there's a season of deception, and then there is a final battle, a judgment, and then the new world where only truth remains. This is recognized all over the world, a little season, where the nations all work together to deceive all of us. They have done a great job. Millions of people are suffering. They're so confused as to what's going on here. So confused what this place is all about. Deceived on a grand scale. A clear operation. It's a plan, and it has tricked so many people. And none of us are perfect, and that's not the point. But we're all here right now in this time period, and we all have a choice at this very moment. Wake up to the deception all around us, reject the lie, and ask for the truth. Because if this is correct and we really are in the little season, then this is the final chance to choose which side we're all on. And it's not up to me or you. We can all choose if this information is real or not. Life is about choices. This is what's written. I believe that this is the point of the story that's been suppressed for so long, and it's now coming to light. And I don't believe it's coming to light for no reason. I believe the entire bible is all centered around this point. It's laid out perfectly in a timeline that's undeniable. There's no guessing about it. Satan had full control. This happened already. He's already done this, and this is the second time. And it's the second time because we can all see that there was greatness. We see that the palaces are everywhere, all over the earth, in every country, almost every town. We see the cathedrals that were built when Christ defeated him at the cross, when he rose from the dead and began his reign, binding Satan for one thousand years in the pit. The deception all stopped. The Milan Cathedral was built. The Cologne Cathedral was built. The Notre Dame Cathedral. Why do you think these palaces are all being destroyed today? Who built them, and who doesn't want them to be here now? Why do you think they all light on fire? Can you see very clearly now? It's all connected. And after the one thousand years, Satan must be loosed. A little season. This is done so that God can see who's coming with him into the kingdom, face to face, living forever. Satan deceives the world one last time. This is all written. And everything in the Bible circulates around this timeline occurring. And in my opinion, we are living in it right now. A timeline so clear. There's no guessing about it. When the fire comes down and ends it all, no war, just judgment. Satan cast it into the lake of fire and then judgment day, where every soul stands before God and the books are opened, and the book of life decides it all. Whoever's not written will be cast into the lake of fire. A new heaven and a new earth follows for those that are written. It's a clear timeline, one that has not happened yet. And we know this by what we see, where we are, and what's going on in the world today. So I'll ask, do any of us really know where we live? How can we be so sure of anything? I've said this for a very long time. I truly believe it. There are no coincidences. I believe that if you're hearing this right now, you were supposed to. I think this place that we live so much more than what we are told. We are not basic. We are not pathetic. We are not random. None of this is. This is a timeline that we were all supposed to be in, and this is a very powerful time to be alive because we all are, in my opinion, in enemy territory. This is not a friendly place at the moment. It's full of deception. It's planned out to deceive you. They want you. They want your soul, and that's the bottom line. He is going to go into the lake of fire. He wants to bring you with him, And life is about choices. I could choose to keep this information to myself. I could never share it. I could hint at it, or I can do what I did today and share it with you and share it with the world and show everybody that this lines up perfectly. It is described to us. It's laid out and explained. So it's our choice now at this very moment to do our own research, improve, grow, and share what we know with others, or we can all just ignore it and pretend that it's all random and just think that these stories are all myths and keep trusting the systems that are built to deceive us. Satan's little season, in my opinion, is not a distant theory. I believe that we are living in it, and it's happening right now as we speak.
Saved - September 25, 2025 at 12:49 PM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

What Lies Beneath - Full Documentary https://t.co/V7dgkAnnx4

Video Transcript AI Summary
131 active, deep underground military bases in The United States and 1,477 of them worldwide. Each one has an average cost of $17,000,000,000 to $19,000,000,000 and they are "capable of building a couple of them a year" with sophisticated methods. "My colleague, Al Felix, has actually been on some of the high speed railways, the Magneto Lebanon trains that connect all the deep underground military bases within The United States," including a "mach two train" that "floats off of a single rail at a three quarters of an inch off the rail." There are tunnels beneath Los Angeles "known as the Actorbot" with a Starbucks "set up at different locations" to allow coffee while driving. Playboy Mansion tunnels "blueprints for a network of tunnels beneath the mansion that supposedly led to the homes of Jack Nicholson, Warren Beatty, James Conn." Raven Rock Mountain Complex is a "shadow government" underground city with five three-story buildings. A tunnel is "constructed out of these interlocking segments... like a snake exoskeleton." There is a 100% probability of a GMD solar storm; a "Carrington event" is cited. "Live life deeper. A 144 stories underground. You may never go outside again." The Cave of Crystals has crystals "36 feet in length and weighs over 55 tons." Hollow-earth legends surround Mount Shasta, Taos, Cheyenne Mountain, and underwater UFOs. There is a reality here.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now there are a 131 Speaker 1: active, deep underground military bases in The United States. There's 1,477 of them worldwide. Each one has an average cost of $17,000,000,000 to $19,000,000,000 Each one is built in the site of oh, it used to be it'd take a year to two years to build each one, and now they're capable of building a couple of them a year with sophisticated methods. My colleague, Al Felix, has actually been on some of the high speed railways, the Magneto Lebanon trains that connect all the deep underground military bases within The United States. He's been on a mach two train and floats off of floats off of a single rail at a three quarters of an inch off the rail, and there's what you call high-tech. We have nothing like this on the surface. Speaker 2: Your NDA is expired, and you could talk about this. You used to work at a secret Starbucks. Is that right? Speaker 3: Yeah. There is a Starbucks that is, like, above reserve, like, a Starbucks no one's ever heard of or been to. Alright? Have you ever wondered while driving in Los Angeles how come you've never seen, like, Will Smith stuck in traffic on the 405? Yeah. I've never seen a one percenter just in their car stuck Speaker 2: in traffic. Why is that? Speaker 3: That's because there's a series of intricate tunnels underneath Los Angeles known as the Actorbot. I'm not kidding. Like, they get access points to move through the city without ever having to be in traffic. You can come up in LAX. You can pop up at Dodger Stadium. Underneath there in those tunnels is Starbucks' set up at different locations to allow them to get coffees while they're driving. All of them. Seinfeld. You've seen Seinfeld down there? No. No. I've seen Seinfeld down there. Dude, almond milk latte, two shots. Wow. Yeah. Was he a good tipper? They don't have Speaker 2: to pay. So though this has been underneath Los Angeles for a few years now? I mean, how long has this been there for? Speaker 3: I mean, it it predates me. If you I I it seems like the city was built on top of it. So I I mean, I think this goes all the way Speaker 2: back to the twenties. That this doesn't seem real almost. This is crazy. Speaker 3: I I imagine how I sound saying it to people. Speaker 4: How long are y'all sis? Speaker 5: Today, I'm doing about nine Speaker 4: Yeah. Keeps you busy. Speaker 1: Till they build more tunnels and then spread out to Speaker 4: the save more. Yeah. Like the lighting in in there too. Yeah. They each, like, trip is about. Yeah. It's crazy. No traffic, no stoplights. It's all That wire Straight to point. That beats the walking too. Plus, with all the construction sucks right now, like you You gotta walk around that piece. Yeah. Speaker 6: So you guys, you're just Speaker 5: There is different there's cities underground. There's warehouses underground. There's actual homes underground. People build these tunnels and they built them for decades. There's a lot in elite celebrities. They go down there for parties. Underneath the Getty Museum in Los Angeles, California. I was there for a cock party. We walked through the museum, through the garden area, and employees led us to underground tunnels. We had to take an elevator and stairs. You we had to be led. There is no way that you can just walk into a tunnel. There the entrances and the exits are in your face, but there's no way that you can just walk through tunnels. There's you'll get stuck. You'll go deeper and deeper. You won't be able to come back out because it's hard because the tunnels run all different directions for miles and miles and miles and miles. So if you go down the wrong one, you'll get stuck and it's confusing to turn back around and get back to where you're going. So you have to be led in and out. I think people assume that when you get underground, it's just this dirt and you keep going deeper and there's more dirt and then there's cages of no. No. It's not how it works. The Playboy Mansion. The Playboy Mansions. I met some really elite people when I was there. I had to do jobs with some elite celebrities. Speaker 4: I'm a psychomediant, so I actually, like, time I walk past his house and obviously obviously the Playboy Mansion's right there and we know about the tunnels that connect from the Playboy Mansion. Speaker 6: To here? Speaker 4: I'm sure they connect here. Why why wouldn't Speaker 6: There are places that connect. So what kind of energy what kind of energy are you picking up? Speaker 4: Just like there's just like darkness. I mean, in general, like, there's always I've always had weird feelings on this street. Yeah. This type well, the Playboy Mansion is down there. So I always thought it was the Playboy Mansion. It wasn't until probably a year ago that I realized this was City's house. Speaker 7: Cannot believe what went on under it. Playboy Magazine reports it has just discovered blueprints for a network of tunnels beneath the mansion that supposedly led to the homes of Jack Nicholson, Warren Beatty, James Conn Speaker 8: Would you want to say a bunny? Speaker 7: And Kirk Douglas. Now dig this. A photo from the late seventies allegedly showing an excavation in progress beneath the mansion, and this one shows the newly discovered tunnel plans. Check out the bunny logo on the plywood wall. Best of all, the blueprint. It says this tunnel leads to James Conn's house, this one to Jack Nicholson's, this one to Kirk Douglas's, And this one goes all Speaker 9: I I don't even know what you would call this to this temple like grotto. I mean, the ceilings in here are at least 50 feet. It has a dead center circle in middle, and all around me are the statues of Greek gods with mirrors behind them, all petrified wood here, lining the columns supporting the structure with, again, that volcanic stone built in around the statues here. The outside of the structure is meant to mimic a volcano, and then you have waterfalls entering through all the sides here flowing down the stairs leading into the center basin here where you have the circular stage. And even if you look up, look at all the carvings of the faces along the ceiling. I was told that the owner has some pretty crazy parties in here. I haven't seen it yet, so we're gonna get my reactions. Apparently, this is this is the spot, so here we go. Speaker 6: Oh Speaker 9: my goodness. So this is the room off of the entrance where we have all these blue vases and just more art. More art from all around the world here. Again, worth over million dollars. And now the the main event. When they said it was a greenhouse, I didn't think it would be this. There's a floating bridge with waterfalls on either side with tropical plants everywhere. This is just ridiculous. And apparently, I was told that the piano right behind me here, this is Steinway's piano. So you know Steinway and Sons? This is not the Sons. This is his original piano. Wow. This is crazy. So I was told that this is the swimming pool. The swimming pool is 100 meters long, so that is two Olympic length swimming pools. And the cost to turn on these fountains is apparently €20,000 just to turn on and run the silence here. I'm truly speechless. You could have a jet ski in here. That's how large this is. Speaker 10: What would happen if the US government was suddenly attacked and wiped out? The United States has something called a shadow government that would immediately take over. They are found in a place called Raven Rock Mountain Complex. This is a top secret underground US government bunker that has been built to withstand a nuclear attack and serve as a backup pentagon. Raven Rock is buried nearly 800 feet below the surface and has been described to be an underground city. To enter, you must enter an underground tunnel, pass various security checkpoints, and venture nearly a half mile into the mountain. There are five three story underground buildings, each representing a ring of the Pentagon. The underground bunker has everything needed to survive barbershops to a post office. As you venture deeper, there are even more highly protected rooms and buildings such as war rooms and the Presidential Suite. In case of an emergency, high ranking officials could travel to the bunker and take shelter there, or if the government was attacked, then the underground government would take control. Similar to Area 51, there is very little information surrounding Raven Rock, but we know of its existence. It makes you wonder what government secrets are out there that we don't know about. Speaker 11: Now the way the tunnel is constructed is it's constructed out of these interlocking segments, kind of like a snake. It's sort of like a snake exoskeleton with double seals. And so even when the ground moves, the it's able to the tunnel actually is able to shift along with the ground, like like an underground snake. And it doesn't crack or break. It's extremely unlikely that both seals would be broken. And it's it's it's capable of taking five atmospheres of pressure. It's waterproof, methane proof, or gas proof of any kind, and, meets all California seismic requirements. Speaker 12: Pay attention and listen because the video I'm about to show you might explain the reason why all of these billionaires are building bunkers. Look. Speaker 13: There is a 100% probability that our son generating what they call a GMD, which is a solar storm. That hits our hits our earth and the the magnetic field that we have around the earth and can fry everything that is electric above the ground, including our entire grid. And and this would happen organically naturally? That's just what the sun does? It has happened. There was a if they call it a Carrington event, which happened in, I think, was 1859. And at that time, basically, we had telegraph lines as far as electricity goes. And it fried our entire telegraph system. It was set up had to be replaced. And The entire thing. The entire thing. And so imagine what that would do now with a very large storm, which there's a 100% chance of it happening. Speaker 14: So if LA couldn't get any creepier with all the problems of crime and homeless, I ran into this billboard on this lot. So this is a vacant lot for construction, and it says, live life deeper. A 144 stories underground. You may never go outside again. It's so creepy. I'm wanting to know if this is real with this construction site right here. West Hollywood Beverly Hills adjacent, a controlled access community, twenty four seven secondurity residents only amenities, a new standard of sustainable living, but it's all underground. Live life deeper. The world's first and only completely subterranean residences. Terrifying. I feel like it's a horror movie. It's so creepy. Speaker 15: In the year February, the Cave Of Crystals was discovered by miners excavating a tunnel for a mine in Mexico. The main chamber contains some of the largest natural crystals ever found in any underground cave. The largest one so far, measuring about 36 feet in length and weighs over 55 tons. The amazingly huge crystals in this subterranean cave have become this large because of the extremely hot temperatures inside of the underground cavern, and this encourages microscopic crystals to form, rapidly growing much faster than what we're used to seeing in cooler locations. Just gazing at these gigantic beautiful crystals, one can't help but get carried away imagining what else awaits further exploration deeper inside these caves. Speaker 16: Hey, TikTok. Just a quick update. It's, Saturday, I believe, And here's the truck I've been driving for the last few days for Wilson Logistics. This trailer just was assigned to us from Kraft over at the Kraft Foods plant, and we're delivering it here to what's called the Spring Field Underground. And that is, as you can see behind me, this giant giant cave that's big enough to house hundreds of these trucks and trailers. There's a train track running through here. Just to give you an idea, back here, there's a regular sized truck. See how tall that is up there. It's just incredible. Anyway, having a great time learning lots. Talk to you soon. Speaker 7: I didn't know you, Budget. I wanna live. No. No. You're too heavy. It's a glandular problem. Warlock. Chuds. Mold people. Speaker 6: There is no escape from the Fortress Of The Moles. No. Except Speaker 17: As you can see, Simpsons, they always they tell you the truth before it actually happens in this matrix because of karmic retribution. They have to tell you the truth in plain sight so karma doesn't come back onto them, the people that run this matrix. And there is also a big spiritual warfare going on, clearly, stuff that we cannot see. Hence why the Grammys with all the satanic ritual, all of it was planned to be like that for rituals, energy harvesting as well. And I said that the start of this year was going to be crazy. I wasn't fucking joking. Speaker 6: Transportation isn't worried about the falling apart infrastructure of America and why they don't update the railing system. It's because they are updating the railing system. See this? That's railing right there. See this? This is underground. You wonder why they're not worried about World War three or worried about chemicals being sprayed in the atmosphere, it's because they don't plan on breathing it in. See that? That's railing right there. This is all semi trucks bringing supplies underground for these powerful elitists to live out the rest of their life. Speaker 8: Well, here is the entrance of a cave that I am about to drive this 18 wheeler through. Every day is an adventure. Yep. Thirteen six. Well, that's what we are. And it's creepy. Speaker 18: The Atlanta underground, a whole another original ground level of a city buried underground. This one has become nothing more than a tourist trap for Atlanta now with a silly backstory to go along with it like all the other underground cities. And here's some footage of somebody taking a little peek at the little tourist trap it's become. Funny how all these cities in the late eighteen hundreds, all suffering from great fires and great floods that caused them to bury their ground levels just like Seattle, Sacramento, Chattanooga, buried history buried right beneath our feet. Speaker 0: Whole idea that there are these tunnel systems that go through the earth. Mount Shasta in Northern California has these kind of legends around it that the Mount Shasta is hollow inside. There's tunnels inside. There's a fine saucer base there, Atlanteans and extraterrestrials or something like that. In Taos, New Mexico, people were hearing a that was coming underground. What people believe was going on there was that you have Cheyenne Mountain. That is a hollow mountain. They hollowed this mountain out. It's got a city in it. There's elevators. There's electric cars. There's even train stations, top secret military base and all that. So apparently, what the people were hearing underneath Taos was this huge tunneling machine going somewhere else. By the way, there's a whole underground world around this thing, so the pyramids. I mean, that's also real, and they've got that all locked up. One thing that is also going on that ties into all this is UFOs coming from underwater. And a lot of these craft, including the flying saucer craft, they're not just aircraft, they're submarines too. And there's just no single answer to all this. And the more you look into all of these things, inner earth, hollow earth tunnels, underwater bases, underground bases, hollowed out mountains, you start to realize that there's very much a Speaker 6: reality here.
Saved - September 25, 2025 at 12:30 PM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Erika Kirk is an entire rabbit hole of her own... https://t.co/pG48IPSjl7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker questions his wife: she had never done a pageant before and just so happens to get a modeling offer in the mail, and she won miss Arizona USA twenty twelve. She was 17 and started a nonprofit working with the United States military in Romania during one of Romania’s largest trafficking crises. She is a licensed real estate agent in the state of New York, and she worked for the same real estate group that did business with Jeffrey Epstein. She was very successful on her own before a mutual friend set her up for an interview with Charlie for Turning Point, and sources are saying that that friend was president Trump. Rumors allege Netanyahu would free up a $150,000,000 of American Jewish money to Turning Point USA, and Charlie declined it. Since Charlie’s death, Turning Point USA has gotten over 18,000 chapter requests across The United States.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is probably gonna lose a lot of you, so please, please just listen to me. Okay? I am a card carrying conservative, but something is up with the wife. Okay? Something is up with the fact that she had never done a pageant before and just so happens to get a modeling offer in the mail. And then she just so happened to win miss Arizona USA twenty twelve. There's something up with the fact that she was 17 and started a nonprofit where she worked alongside the United States military in Romania, doing work with orphanages at the same period that Romania was having one of its largest trafficking crises in its history. There's also something up with the fact that she is a licensed real estate agent in the state of New York, and she worked for the same real estate group that did business with Jeffrey Epstein. And she was very, very successful on her own before the mutual friend set her up for her interview with Charlie for Turning Point, and sources are saying that that friend was president Trump. You guys, she was already successful. She had this vision, and now there are rumors that allegedly Netanyahu was going to free up a $150,000,000 of American Jewish money to Turning Point USA and Charlie declined it. And you guys, just since Charlie's death, Turning Point USA has gotten over 18,000 chapter requests across The United States. I did not hear one mention of Israel or Netanyahu or the backlash that Charlie had been facing in Erica's speech. And today, when the Charlie Kirk show was live, none of his friends or coworker said one thing about it while they were all talking about the alleged shooter in Utah. And you guys, that's something that they should at least clear up or acknowledge, but they're not talking about it. And all rabbit holes lead to the same place. So please think critically about this. God bless.
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 7:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a series of posts about Erika Kirk, revealing her past as a TV actress and her reactions following her husband's tragic death. I included a clip of her speech, which many found unsettling, including widows who questioned its authenticity. There were also claims of a body double due to facial recognition discrepancies. I noted her connections to the military and her unusual social media behavior, which seemed at odds with her previously private life. The ongoing discussions raise questions about the authenticity of her public persona and the circumstances surrounding her family's narrative.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

#ErikaKirk Video #1) Did you know that before any of this, Erika Kirk was an actress on TV? Here's a clip of her on Bravo's reality show "Summer House" Video #2) Erika's full speech to the world ~48 hours after her husband's brutal death on the world stage. I'm not going to inject any personal opinion on it - I want you to watch it yourself, and tell me what YOU think. Remember: you are hard-wired with an intuition to read human emotions. Trust your instincts. Photo #3) My own opinions aside, I've had countless people message and comment on my posts (many more private) saying that they got weird vibes from her speech, including WIDOWS who have gone through family deaths themselves, and are calling a very loud "B.S.", claiming that it had to be an acting performance. Video #4) Here is the video of Erika petting Charlie's dead hands for Instagram. Many have claimed that Charlie's supposed hands don't look real, that the flatness of his torso seems "mannequin-like", and that the giant "G" ring she has on is a bit strange. People are also pointing out that for their entire history together, Charlie and Erika have been VERY private about their personal lives (private wedding, always hiding their kids faces in photos, etc.) Does this seem like something a highly-private, grieving widow would post on social media 2 days after watching the gruesome slaying of her husband and father of her kids? Let me know what you think.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jordan's probably a virgin. So I'm setting Jordan up with my friend Erica. She's beautiful, and she happens to be religious.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jordan's probably a virgin. So I'm setting Jordan up with my friend Erica. She's beautiful, and she happens to be religious.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Erica Kirk thanks law enforcement, first responders, Turning Point USA staff, and supporters. She thanks President Trump. 'Two days ago, my husband, Charlie went to see the face of his savior and his God.' Charlie always said that when he was gone, he would be remembered for his courage and his faith. He loved life, America, the Chicago Cubs, and the Oregon Ducks, and most of all his children. He believed his top priority would be to revive the American family; one of his favorite verses was Ephesians five verse 25. 'The evildoers responsible for my husband's assassination have no idea what they have done.' 'The movement my husband built will not die.' and 'The movement's not going anywhere, and it will only grow stronger when you join it.' Nobody is ever too young to know the gospel. 'Making heaven crowded.' She urges visiting tpusa.com and tpusa faith.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jesus. This one. Speaker 1: Good evening. My name is Erica Kirk. Charlie Kirk is my husband. I first wanna thank the local, state, and federal law who worked tirelessly to capture my husband's assassin so that he can be brought to justice. I wanna thank the first responders who struggled heroically heroically to save Charles' life and the police who acted bravely to make sure that there were no other victims on that terrible afternoon. I wanna thank the officers who have protected our Turning Point USA family these past two days. And I wanna thank the Turning Point USA board, the COO, Justin Strife, and my husband's chief of staff, the amazing Mikey McCoy, for all their work in these terrible days to be the stability for our family and for the wider Turning Point USA family as well. My heart is with every one of my husband's employees who lost a friend and a mentor. I wanna thank the staffers of this his amazing Charlie Kirk show who helped him broadcast from this studio, this Speaker 0: this chair. Every day he loved it. He loved what he did. Speaker 1: I wanna thank the millions of people who have shown their love for Charlie here in Phoenix, across America, and worldwide. I wanna thank my husband's dear friend, vice president Vance, and his phenomenal wife, Usha, for their love and support. You guys honored my husband so well bringing him home. Speaker 0: You both are tremendous. Speaker 1: I wanna thank president Trump and his incredible family for the same. Mister president, my husband loved you, Speaker 0: and he knew that you loved him too. He did. Your friendship was amazing. You supported him so well as did he for you. Speaker 1: Two days ago, my husband, Charlie went to see the face of his savior and his God. Charlie always said that when he was gone, he, he wanted to be remembered Speaker 0: for his courage and for his faith. Speaker 1: And one of the final conversations that he had on this earth, my husband witnessed for his Lord and savior, Jesus Christ. Now and for all eternity, he will stand at his savior's side wearing the glorious crown of a martyr. Speaker 0: Charlie loved loved life. He Speaker 1: loved his life. He loved America. He loved nature, which helped him always bring him closer to God. He loved the Chicago Cubs. And my goodness, did he love the Oregon Ducks? Want me to say go Ducks. So I have to since they play on Saturday. So go Ducks. But most of all, Charlie loved his children, Speaker 0: and he loved me with Speaker 1: all of his heart, And I knew that every day. I knew that he made sure I knew that every day. Every day he would ask me, how can I serve you better? How can I be Speaker 0: a better husband? How can I be a better father? Every day. Every day. He's such a good man. He still is a good man. Speaker 1: He was the perfect father. He was the perfect husband. Charlie always believed that God's design for marriage in family was absolutely amazing and it is. It is. And it was the greatest joy of his life. And over and over, he would tell all these young people to come and find their future spouse, become wives and husbands and parents. And the reason why is because he wanted you all to experience what he had and still has. He wanted everyone to bring heaven into this earth through love and joy that comes from raising a family. It's beautiful. Charlie always said that if he ever ran for office, I know a lot of you asked if he ever was going to, but privately, he told me if he ever did run for office that his top priority would be to revive the American family. That was his priority. One of Charlie's favorite Bible verses was Ephesians five verse 25. Husbands, Speaker 0: love your wives as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her. My husband laid down his life for me, for our nation, Speaker 1: for our children. He showed the ultimate and true covenantal love. I will never ever have the words to describe the loss that I feel in my heart. I honestly have no idea what any of this means. Speaker 0: I know that God does, but I don't. But, Charlie baby, I know you do too. I know you do. So does our Lord. Speaker 1: And our world is filled with evil. But our God, you Speaker 0: guys are God is so good. Speaker 1: So incredibly good. And we know that for those who love God, all things work together for good. For those who are called according to his purpose. Already I have seen the worldwide outpouring of love for my husband. I've heard the testimonies from people my husband inspired to get married, to start families, to seek out a relationship with God. It's the most important most important one of all. The evildoers responsible for my husband's assassination have no idea what they have done. They killed Charlie because he preached a message of patriotism, faith, and of God's merciful love. They should all know this. If you thought that my husband's mission was powerful before, you have no idea. You have no idea what you just have unleashed across this entire country. In this world, you have no idea. You have no idea the fire that you have ignited within this wife. The cries of this widow will echo around the world like a battle cry. To everyone listening tonight across America, the movement my husband built will not die. It won't. I refuse to let that happen. It will not die. All of us will refuse to let that happen. No one will ever forget my husband's name, and I will make sure of it. It will become stronger, bolder, louder, and greater than ever. My husband's mission will not end, not even for a moment. And one of Charlie's greatest talents was his ability, this phenomenal ability to choose great people to follow him. He could always find the ones who could handle any setback. And it's almost like he knew, he just he could see it in you. Even when you couldn't see it in yourself, he just knew. He knew you could handle it. You thought you only had 5% left and he knew you had 15. He knew you were ready to go that extra mile even when you didn't. He always challenged people around him to work harder and to be better. He never gave up. And I love knowing that one of his one of his mottos was never surrender. So I wanna tell you that that we'll never surrender. We never will, ever. Ever. Our campus tour this fall will continue. There will be even more tours in the years to come. America Fest here in Phoenix this December will go on. It will be greater than ever. The radio and podcast show that he was so proud of Speaker 0: will go on. Speaker 1: And in a world filled with chaos, doubt, and uncertainty, my husband's voice will remain, and it will ring out louder and more clearly than ever, and his wisdom will endure. My favorite my my favorite too, but my husband's favorite word in the English language was earn. He would call all of you to be people of action who earn the future America deserves. So to all of the young people who felt inspired by my husband's faith and hard work, all of you already know what Charlie would want you to do. You know. You know. If you're in high school or if you're in college, go find your local Turning Point USA chapter. Join it. Stay involved. He wants you to make a difference, and you can. You can. The movement's not going anywhere, and it will only grow stronger when you join it. If there isn't a chapter, you can't find one, start one. There is no excuse. You can start one. And as my husband used to say in this room every single day, if you wanna get involved, the best way you can do that is going to tpusa.com. That's what he would say every day from this chair. Every single day, I watched his show every day, and he would always say if you want to get involved, go to tpusa.com. If you're a pastor, join our movement at t p u s a faith. And if you're a parent, I highly recommend that you come to America Fest in December. Sign up right now for that because we would love to see you. I would love to Speaker 0: see you. Charlie would. He'll be there. He'll be there in spirit. Speaker 1: Bring your kids. Bring your family. But most important of all, if you aren't a member of a church, I beg you to join one, a bible believing church. Our battle is not simply a political one above all, is spiritual. It is spiritual. The spiritual warfare is palpable. Charlie loved his savior with all of his heart and he wanted every one of you to know him too. He wanted everyone to know that if they confess, if they confess the Lord Jesus Christ who rose from the dead, then they will be saved. Hear me when I say this. Nobody is ever too young to know the gospel. Nobody. Speaker 0: Nobody is ever too young to Speaker 1: get involved with saving this beautiful country. This country my husband loved and still loves. And nobody is ever too old either. There's no age limit. I know my husband is still here. Speaker 0: He's watching over us. Speaker 1: I don't remember the last time I slept. I couldn't sleep last night. And, Charlie, baby. Charlie, I promise I will never let your legacy die, baby. I won't. I I promise I'll make Turning Point USA the biggest thing that this nation has ever seen. I promise. Speaker 0: Oh, Charlie, I love you. I love you, baby. Speaker 1: Rest in the arms of our Lord as he blankets you with the words I know your heart always strives to hear. Well done, my good and faithful servant. When I got home last night, Gigi, our daughter just ran into our my arms. Speaker 0: And I talked to her and she said, mommy, I missed you. I said, I missed you too, baby. She goes, where's daddy? What do you tell a three year old? She's three. I said, daddy loves you so much. Don't you worry. He's on a, he's on Speaker 1: a work trip with Jesus so he can afford your blueberry budget. And my goodness, am I so humbled to witness, Charlie, you alongside Jesus right now doing what you always wanna do, baby. Making heaven crowded. Right? That's what it's all about. Making heaven crowded. Speaker 0: I can't wait to see you again one day. Speaker 1: Thank you all again who love my husband, who supported him, who wrote him an email every single day during his radio show. He read all Speaker 0: of them. All of them. God bless you all, Speaker 1: and may God bless America.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Oh, I love you. I love you. I love you. I love I love you. I love love you. You. God bless you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, I love you. I love you. I love you. I love I love you. I love love you. You. God bless you.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

🧐🧐🧐 https://t.co/wuHPsL5cvg

@FaithDyson16 - Faith Dyson

@benwehrman This is 2nd hand info, but a friend did a facial recognition comparison using pix from 'Erika's' IG account and pix from 'Erika's' address to the nation. There was no match, which would explain why that 'Erika' who spoke so 'calmly' also 'acted so strangely'. She's a Body Double?

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

https://t.co/JuPuj73cPr

@nick_bone_ - Nick Bone

She visited the pentagon in 2012, was involved with the military, and was in Trump’s Miss USA pageant She saw him in Israel, knew he was famous, then arranged a meeting in NYC where they basically decided to get married. If you saw an influencer family staging every moment of their life, typically you’d be revolted. Here’s Charlie telling the story of how they met which isn’t fully true and he just yanks his daughter into place to pretend she’s looking at him. He keeps checking the camera. Yeah it’s really weird

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker recounts: 'And so I've been able to travel to the Pentagon.' They add that 'I've been able to meet general Salazar, who's actually out here in Arizona,' and that 'I've also been able to donate a locker to the Sojourner Center, which you're looking at right now.' They also say 'Wow.' and 'So there's been a lot of things that have been going on from working in the military to traveling to just being able to get out.' The remarks connect military work with travel and community involvement, highlighting tangible actions and ongoing momentum. The overall message links public service, travel, and community contributions as interconnected activities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so I've been able to travel to the Pentagon. I've been able to meet general Salazar, who's actually out here in Arizona. And I've also been able to donate a locker to the Sojourner Center, which you're looking at right now. Wow. So there's been a lot of things that have been going on from working in the military to traveling to just being able to get out.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Story time at Bill's Burgers in New York City recounts the moment near this very table when dad met mom for the first time, an encounter that began as a job interview and evolved into something deeper. The speaker describes asking questions about philosophy, religion, and Jesus, noting the exchange that followed and the realization that mom was beautiful, smart, elegant, and Christ-like. This realization catalyzed a decisive pivot: forget this job interview, I want to date you. I said, I have enough friends. From that moment, the couple's journey began, shaping the path that followed. This origin story marks where their journey started.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Story time. So we're here at Bill's Burgers in New York City. And right near this very table was the first time that dad met mama, and it started as a job. And I was asking all these questions asking all these questions, philosophy, religion, Jesus. And then I realized mama was beautiful and smart and elegant and Christ like. And so I said, forget this job interview. I want to date you. And I said, I have enough friends. And that's where your journey started.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

I'm out of my depth on all religious stuff, but this just keeps getting more and more bizarre Tag in any dialed-in Christians you know; we need eyes on this [📹kaypodgee on IG] https://t.co/vEJl2f8eKF

Video Transcript AI Summary
"The moment I saw the footage, I knew something was off." The speaker asserts the footage is off and that before the Butler rally "something was very wrong," with mainstream media "jamming this down our throats" and causing division. "We are just at the beginning of the deceptions," he says, urging listeners to "slow down" and "pray on it" for discernment. He won't cover viral anomalies and instead focuses on his wife: "when she was 17 years old she began working with the US military, specifically the Department of Defense and the Pentagon." He claims she and Trump met Epstein, and Trump introduced her to Charlie Kirk; he declares, "I don't believe that anything on the world stage is real" and that "they all promote Catholicism very heavily and have Vatican ties." He cites "eye color yellow" and "reptilian" teeth, "idol heaven on earth" at Athena Nike, "Mars Hill" reference, and a call for "a full military occupation of American cities" with "MK Ultra" imagery. The name "Irina Zorutska" is urged to be said; he ends with "The Art of War" and "Politics are not real."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The moment I saw the footage, I knew something was off. Never have we been allowed to watch things that are gory like that, nonetheless see them on the internet and spread through social media and been shown through the news prior to the Butler rally, which I also think was either fake or something was very wrong. And now all of a sudden the mainstream media is jamming this down our throats. It's causing a ton of division. There are people with God given discernment that are sensing that something is wrong with it, knowing what we know about the world stage, and then there are others who are quick to blindly follow anything that calls itself Christianity. We are just at the beginning of the deceptions. If you can't stop and take a second to analyze something or pray on it or ask God about it, you need to slow down. I'm just gonna be honest because you're gonna be in trouble if you don't ask God about these things. This is just the beginning. I'm not gonna show the things that have gone viral that are weird about it like the book detailing it coming out the day before it happened, the GG rings like the Freemason symbols, the yellow hands. I'm not even going to bother covering that. We're going to look at his wife. So first of all, when she was 17 years old she began working with the US military, specifically the Department of Defense and the Pentagon. Then she apparently got an invite to be in a pageant which she immediately won which is something that you have to train for like years like pageants are not as easy as they look and that is where she started bumping shoulders with Trump and Epstein and then Trump eventually introduced her to Charlie Kirk. Now let me just say this is not me trying to be insensitive or like not caring that people die. I don't believe that anything on the world stage is real including all politics, including things like Joe Rogan, Candace Owens, Charlie Kirk. Even before these incidents, I didn't believe that any of them were like people like us, you know what I mean? Because you just don't get that big with the type of opinions that we have. And notice how yeah they'll speak against Israel but they all promote Catholicism very heavily and have Vatican ties. And honestly I used to really like Candace Owens. I don't want this to be true but you can't tell me that she does the research that she does and yet is a Catholic and married to a high level Jesuit. I mean really think about it, if you watch her episodes, she's having like people that are supposedly ex CIA people exposing the CIA's secrets to an audience of 5,000,000. I don't think so. That's not going to happen. They're not going to allow that to happen. You know who else is trained by the Jesuits? Erica Kirk. And isn't it interesting that she posted this long thing about life weirdly enough is a countdown you don't get forever. Da da da. August 20 there's your disclosure. Charlie Kirk's usernames are charliekirk11. I know a lot of you guys have probably seen the three hats lined up where it adds up to 11:11 eleven and then it makes 33 like on the shooting footage. So just take note of her eye color and what her eyes look like and I'm going to show you some stills from videos of her talking both recently and a few months ago. That's weird, her eyes are yellow. I'm sorry, but if you don't see what's wrong with these, you don't have discernment. They are literally reptilian. They're up and down like almonds. And they're yellow. I mean you don't have to have sharp discernment to look at these and be like okay this is weird. And when you go frame by frame, the majority of them, her teeth are like razor sharp. This woman has like a perfect smile. You can't tell me that this is like just blurry footage or something. So this eye is yellow and that one's red and like reptilian when she has bright blue eyes. I didn't alter this footage you could go and do this yourself just go to her Instagram and look at the footage and slow it down. The teeth again and this one was a few months ago so way before the media circus. Not only are the eyes really weird, but again, sharp teeth. And again, this woman has a perfect smile. When I searched up her name, I clicked an article and this was one of the photos that they featured. Look at her eye, it's completely darkened even though it's open. Know she's squinting but her eye is completely dark. So then I looked through a couple of her stories. She went to the temple of Athena Nike in Greece, which I've been talking about Athena is the whore of Babylon and I do believe she's coming back and she captions it idle heaven on earth and then goes over to the Acropolis which they are rebuilding they just put new elevators in it's really really weird and when I was asking around why they are rebuilding it everybody was acting shady and like I was like doing something wrong. She wrote: And when Apostle Paul arrived in Athens and saw this place, he went down to Mars Hill right below and stood in the shadows of this exact altar. Again, you don't need crazy good discernment to be like, why is she saying that Paul stood in the shadows of the altar to Athena Nike which is the whore of Babylon? That's in Acts 17 where he says God doesn't exist in a temple made by man. Why would she go up to the Acropolis and post these things? And if you look through her stories, she loves the Catholic church, of course, all things that are like idol worship. Like I mean she literally wrote idol heaven. And Charlie Kirk had just recently called for a full military occupation of American cities once they liberate DC. The last thing he posted before this happened was that we need an all out war on crime or more innocents will die. And then the girl on the subway which was very clearly like some kind of AI footage, people zoomed in, the guy wasn't even holding a weapon. Like the whole thing was just really weird, there were people that pulled up different instances where it's the same exact girl and they claimed that she had some kind of brutal death. She had a whole bunch of pictures and videos where she had the MK Ultra stuff all over her, the monarch butterflies and like doing like hand symbols and stuff like that. And then her name, her last name doesn't exist. It was only her and one other person in the entire world that has that last name. The last name translates to from the ditch. The first name is the name of a Celtic goddess, which is fine, but it also means peace. So as a whole, it means peace from the grave. And spiritually I don't care who calls me a conspiracy theorist, this is the truth. When they're telling you to say a phrase or say a name or they intentionally push something to trend, that is because they need to siphon all of our energy to complete a ritual. They need to siphon everybody's energy. Anger, fear, anxiety, any type of stress helps them move forward if they can direct it where they want it to go. So they want you to say this name that means peace from the ditch or the grave over and over and charge it with negative emotions. A day or two before this whole thing happened, he posts this. Speaker 1: Okay, everybody. You've probably heard the situation that happened in North Carolina. Say the name Irina Zorutska. Irina Zorutska was just a riding public transit. By the way, she was a Speaker 0: He goes on to say say the name, like, two or three more times in that clip. Why would they so directly be, like, egging you on to say the name and be upset? Same thing with Elon Musk. Do you really think that these bigwigs care about the little people? Why do they why is it so specific when they do care? If you read the book The Art of War, we are basically living that out and most people are falling into it 110% because what's happening is they're basically neutralizing their opponent very effectively because of the lack of discernment. A lot of Christians mix their faith with politics. People yell at me for talking about it but I'm trying to pull people out of the fire. Politics are not real. People are attaching their faith and their walk with God with a political activist that's on the world stage.
Video Transcript AI Summary
"Erica Kirk as the new CEO and chair of the board for Turning Point USA." "In Ecclesiastes, King Solomon wrote that mankind is to be tested by God." "It was the honor of our lives to serve as board members at Charlie's side." "Charlie prepared all of us for a moment like this one." "He worked tirelessly to ensure Turning Point USA was built to survive even the greatest tests." "I believe that this is what Revelation 12 is all about." "behold, something greater than Solomon is here." "If you look closely, it's a sign she was in Israel that says Trump, make Israel great." "If this is it, she is going to fool every single lukewarm Christian and everybody who is not guided by God."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I could not make this up if I tried. I just posted this video where I was talking about how there was a lot of things that set off my discernment with Erica Kirk and the entire situation. Of course, everybody and their brother is upset with me because I told the truth and showed truthful things, which is triggering. So right after I post this, I log into my social media and look at what comes up. Turning point, just put this message out, but wait until I show you the videos afterwards. Erica Kirk announcement. In Ecclesiastes, King Solomon wrote that mankind is to be tested by God. Today, we are facing such a test. Yet we also know that God has prepared us with everything we need to overcome this ordeal. It was the honor of our lives to serve as board members at Charlie's side. Charlie prepared all of us for a moment like this one. He worked tirelessly to ensure Turning Point USA was built to survive even the greatest tests. And now it is our great pride to announce Erica Kirk as the new CEO and chair of the board for Turning Point USA. I want you to take notice that the very first thing it says is in Ecclesiastes, King Solomon wrote that mankind is to be tested by God. I'm gonna show you a video I posted ten days ago. We are living in the Simpsons movie and it's biblical. Before we get started, I need to show you one of my first videos where I did the math Solomon's temple because it's important to this. So then I asked it to create an image of a geodesic dome over a flat earth model utilizing 3.33 repeating as pie. Guys, my mind is shook. It has the sacred So now we know that Solomon's Temple hexagonal geodesic dome that looked something like this. You guys remember Chicken Little where the sky was made of hexagons and it fell and it was like a hoverboard and when the sky broke apart, it was actually like alien spacecrafts. And I know I can't be the only one that keeps seeing people post sky hexagon pictures and videos on social media. So Solomon created a geodesic three six nine dome. So Trump is making his own dome, and this would be because God hammers out the sky like molten metal. In the Simpsons movie, there's a secret dome that's carried in by drones. I've been talking nonstop about how the whore of Babylon is going to pretend to be Mary and that we're coming up on a five hundredth anniversary of a Marian apparition and I believe that this is what Revelation 12 is all about. She stands with the moon under her feet. Well, in Matthew 12, it says, the queen of the South will rise up at the judgment with this generation and condemn it for she came from the ends of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon and behold, something greater than Solomon is here. Well, she came to Solomon to question him when he built his temple. And in the Simpsons movie, she comes when they put the dome over them. Happy birthday, Mary. Okay. And if you watched the original video that everybody's chewing me up for, you would know that Trump was the one that set her up with Charlie Kirk. She has a very close relationship with Trump, which could be why in her story she has things like this. If you look closely, it's a sign she was in Israel that says Trump, make Israel great. Speaker 1: Here to say welcome to the spiritual war. If you're not aware of it, put on the armor, stand your post, you're a woman of the word. And when you feel isolated or unseen, go back to that blueprint. Ruth, Deborah, Hannah, Esther, mother Mary, any of them. Go back to the blueprint. Fix your eyes on Christ because this is not for the faint of hearts, this spiritual battle. Speaker 0: I've been talking about how we're gonna see the queen of the South. She's going to be a weeping woman and we know from first kings that the queen of the South tests Solomon's wisdom. So if this is it, which I'm not saying 100% that it is, but this is definitely something to watch because I have looked through her posts and multiple times. Most of her posts are scripturally sound when I go and look at them myself, but there's a few where the scripture is a little bit off or the concept is a little bit off. If this is it, she is going to fool every single lukewarm Christian and everybody who is not guided by God. And I I have a weird feeling that this is somebody to watch.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

https://t.co/GaaxvmbVHp

@GeneralpattonS - GeneralPatton’sGhost

The rabb1 hole just continues to get deeper. And weirder. If this is true it makes Charlie Kirk an unwitting pawn in yet another Z10n1st puppet show. Would you be shocked? Question everything. https://t.co/BUC57PcFsJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Transcript presents allegations about a former Miss Arizona: that she competed in Miss USA (owned by Trump) after claiming she had never done pageants or modeling, and that she modeled for Trump as one of his pageant girls. It alleges she was a casting director at the same time, though this isn’t stated on her site, and that she ran a ministry serving the US military in Romania in a region where locals accused evangelical ministries of kidnapping and trafficking children to the UK, Israel, and undisclosed private islands. It mentions discussions about Epstein files involving Charlie Kirk’s wife, and that before marrying Kirk she was a self-made millionaire who later accumulated his wealth and millions in donations. It recounts their first date at a 2018 Turning Point USA event, where a job interview allegedly turned into a date, with her remarking, 'you’re not gonna be my boss.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Twenty twenty twelve wins miss Arizona competes in miss USA, a pageant owned by ...trump. K. Wanna know something really weird? So she had said in a podcast that she had never competed in pageants and had never done any modeling before. Until one day, she received an invitation in the mail to become a model and start doing pageants. And the pageant said she started doing were miss USA pageants owned by Trump. So she modeled for Trump. She was one of Trump's pageant girls. But did you know that she was also a casting director at the same time that she was doing all of this stuff for Trump? Now she doesn't specify on her website if she worked as a casting director for Trump. But around the time that she was claiming to be a casting director, she also owned a ministry that was working with the US military in Romania. The area in Romania where she was operating this ministry had a bunch of locals accusing these evangelical ministries of kidnapping children and trafficking them out of the country. These children were being found in The UK, in Israel, and were also being sent to undisclosed private islands. Locals demanded authorities look into it, but they never did. Now, Charlie Kirk really wanted the Epstein files released, but did his wife? Prior to marrying Charlie Kirk, she was a multi millionaire on her own and since his passing, she's also amassed all of his wealth plus an additional at least $5,000,000 in donations. She's currently considered the most powerful woman in The United States with mega fans begging her to run as vice president in 2028. Let's talk about their first date because it was actually a job interview. Back in 2018, two years after Donald Trump had started working with Charlie Kirk, Charlie Kirk had hosted a Turning Point USA opening event for one of the offices that they had opened. And Erica and Charlie Kirk were introduced to each other. Charlie Kirk instantly thought that she was beautiful but thought that she was really smart. And allegedly, one of their mutuals had suggested that Kirk hire Erica. I'm assuming it was Donald Trump or someone on his team because Donald Trump had signed on to work with Charlie Kirk, and Erica was already one of Donald Trump's employees. So it would make the most sense for Donald Trump and his team to encourage Charlie Kirk to hire Donald Trump's employees. Anyways, Charlie Kirk DM'd Erica, invited her for a job interview. The job interview ended up turning into a date, and Erica allegedly had said, you're not gonna be my boss. You're gonna

@GeneralpattonS - GeneralPatton’sGhost

A new conspiracy enters the arena 🦇 sh1t crazy right? Until you remember M0ssad spent years planning to get pager b0mbs into the hands of hezbollah Not saying I am sold on this, but the only things I trust 100% right now: 1) the authorities are corrupt, dishonest, and https://t.co/z2dfstVGuF

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Erika, how did your mom choose Phoenix? "There was more of a...ummm...an opportunity. She was getting involved with uhhh...the government...Homeland Security and Department of Defense. She had other business partners out here that were already in that industry." https://t.co/RtDYmMKeQ7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Question about how mom chose Phoenix. She "chose to move to Phoenix, from Ohio because there was more of a, an opportunity for a female business owner out here" and "Especially from the standpoint of she was getting involved with the government. So Homeland Security and Department of And so she had other business partners that were out here that were already in that industry." "Even one that was a mentor of hers." "So it really convenient to be able to come all together in one place to really have that." "But my father ended up moving out here as well because my grandparents had a home out in Sun City." "And so it took a little bit to get everyone out here." "It took several years but by that time everyone was out here so we had a little bit more family than just us."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can I ask you a question? It's maybe off topic. How'd you how did your mom choose Phoenix? So she chose to move to Phoenix, from Ohio because there was more of a, an opportunity for a female business owner out here, Especially from the standpoint of she was getting involved with the government. So Homeland Security and Department of And so she had other business partners that were out here that were already in that industry. Even one that was a mentor of hers. So it really convenient to be able to come all together in one place to really have that. But my father ended up moving out here as well because my grandparents had a home out in Sun City. And so it took a little bit to get everyone out here. It took several years but by that time everyone was out here so we had a little bit more family than just us.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

https://t.co/IOCv5F4wWB

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

"The reason why nobody on Earth has seen Charlie & Erika's children's faces (in photos or IRL), and not a single pregnancy photo exists, is because they are very private." ...they say as Erika posts vials of blood and stroking Charlie's dead corpse on Instagram. FFS people 🤦‍♂️ https://t.co/droGfd8ONP

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker delivers a brief, affectionate message, focusing on love and blessing. The exact phrases are: Oh, I love you. I love you. I love you. I love I love you. You. God bless you. The passage consists of repeated expressions of love followed by a blessing, culminating with 'God bless you.' The cadence is formed by repetition, and the overall sentiment is warm and benevolent toward the listener. The excerpt contains no other content, context, or narrative elements beyond these lines, and the emphasis is on emotional warmth and goodwill. The structure highlights repetition for emphasis, with a single closing blessing that reinforces positive sentiment toward the audience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, I love you. I love you. I love you. I love I love you. I love love you. You. God bless you.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

https://t.co/EzelrT8Rhr

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

"The reason why nobody on Earth has seen Charlie & Erika's children's faces (in photos or IRL), and not a single pregnancy photo exists, is because they are very private." ...they say as Erika posts vials of blood and stroking Charlie's dead corpse on Instagram. FFS people 🤦‍♂️ https://t.co/droGfd8ONP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Oh, I love you. I love you. I love you. I love I love you. You. God bless you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, I love you. I love you. I love you. I love I love you. I love love you. You. God bless you.
Saved - September 22, 2025 at 10:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see clear evidence that the Charlie Kirk "rooftop shooter" video is completely fake. These fabricated narratives distract us from the real issues that unravel the entire story. I've noticed an unusual influx of bots discussing this topic, which signals something significant. It feels like we're being misled with low-quality videos to keep us debating trivial details instead of focusing on the truth. We need to spread awareness to counter these distractions and stay informed about what's really happening.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

🚨👀 Clear evidence that the Charlie Kirk "rooftop shooter" video is 100% FAKE. They keep shoving these fabricated storylines in your face to keep you distracted from the real questions, which quickly unravel the entire narrative we've been fed. WAKE UP. https://t.co/Jgtf1B0P9X

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

More A.I. proof 👇 https://t.co/zPEoZDWBU3

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

🚨👀 WOW - New proof of A.I. found in one of the key #CharlieKirk video clips! Watch the chair - it goes right through the gray table when the bodyguard throws it to the side! What in the world is going on with all of these FAKE videos from the event?? 🧐🪑

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

https://t.co/M7PyzyTzQp

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Was The Charlie Kirk Assassination FAKED? Full Breakdown https://t.co/op3xHdjSFt

Video Transcript AI Summary
People are arguing that Charlie Kirk's assassination might be fake. 'this is a necklace and not some bulletproof vest.' 'You popped a squib, bro. He did.' 'the blood pack was fully emptied' and 'no blood hitting the concrete.' 'Now this blood that is supposedly coming out, this blood is is cleaned cleaned up, it's oxygenized and it's headed for the brain.' 'This is the magic of cinema. With a special tool filled with red liquid and remote controlled mini explosives, the effects of blood and gunshot wounds are made to look real.' 'This is a 100% production.' 'hired help.' 'a female filming' standing like a statue to film it all as well. 'these Freemasons, Charlie, he's a Freemason.' 'They do it all the time, constantly.' 'false flag.' 'Charlie is a good actor.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What the fuck is this piece of shit? On this episode, you might be a dumb motherfucker. This k? Or the fact that he disassembled this after taking a shot, which the rifle's gonna be hot. They found no gloves. There's just so many inconsistencies that just makes zero sense. I mean, I'm still working on this, and I have taken this rifle apart a thousand times. Now he has to put the pieces of the rifle into a backpack, and this is a gigantic backpack. That I will pack best backpacks in the fucking plane. Anyways, as you can see, this barrel broken down does not fit in his backpack, and this is a big boy, way bigger than one he was carrying. K? I put the rifle stock in here, guess what? It doesn't fit. It sticks out. Now let's just say for sake of argument that he put these in his pant leg as he's walking. These are still so long broken down that he would not be able to walk straight. He wouldn't be able to bend his legs. Doesn't make fucking sense. Speaker 1: Love you, Charlie. Thank you. Thank you. This is in the restroom. I'll be right back. You're good. Bye, everyone. Speaker 2: I'm gonna play this and pause the point where you can see clearly, once again, this is a necklace and not some bulletproof vest. Let's take a look. Let me back this up here just a tad, and you're gonna see. Move this around. Move this forward. And clearly, this is a necklace, not a bulletproof vest. Speaker 1: People are arguing that Charlie Kirk's assassination might be fake. He leans over, and you can see that there's something right there in his shirt, something dark. And then as the video goes on Mom, mom went in there to help her and noticed she had vomited off some kind of blackish material. It really looks almost white. He bend he begins bleeding from that exact area. Okay. Okay. You see the t shirt do that the air thing? Look where the blood comes from. Out of the t shirt. You see that? Out of the t shirt. You can see it happen. He popped a squib, bro. He did. He popped a squib. Holy fuck. They got me at first. Yeah. It looks fake as fuck. I worked in Jacksonville from '85 through '88, and we averaged about a gunshot wound every day. So it would leave you three or four days during the week to have nobody shot, and then the weekends would make up for it. There'd be, like, three or four gunshots that come in. And we would go get them in Speaker 3: the helicopter. Now I did bleeding that goes on with gunshot wounds and this one with Charlie. Now remember now, this blood that is supposedly coming out, this blood is is cleaned cleaned up, it's oxygenized and it's headed for the brain. Now in the brain there's all kinds of capillaries and the blood goes down to one molecule. Okay? One cell. Okay? Then it goes in and makes this change of oxygen to carbon dioxide. Then it comes out blue blood and heads back to the, heart and lungs. It's about as thin and it's prepared for these capillaries in the brain to make the swap. Okay. Now this is the I mean this blood has to be at its best. Okay. It has to be thin, fit through one cell at a time and, or you got problems. It's called a stroke. I wanna show you what I found as far as, how did this happen to Charlie? Speaker 4: Two bullets lodged in his chest, but he stood still, expressionless. This is not a story about a man who is bulletproof. This is the magic of cinema. With a special tool filled with red liquid and remote controlled mini explosives, the effects of blood and gunshot wounds are made to look real. Speaker 1: Not counting gang violence. Great. Speaker 3: Okay. If you Speaker 1: if it Speaker 3: if you didn't see it or it doesn't make sense to you, what I'm getting at is this blood that has been prepared by your body for your brain to go in through those capillaries. It would be it would be a death sentence to have that blood in chunks, and that's what it is here is. It's coming out in chunks like it's already coagulated. I would say that the guy's already dead over a day. Okay? Because blood doesn't come out in chunks. It squirts out possibly, arterial blood especially, but it doesn't do that. It doesn't come out in chunks. This is this is definitely some trickery going on, and that's this looks exactly like it does in the movies when they need somebody shot in the chest. Okay? And I, you know, I hate to I hate to burst your bubble because I I had the same reaction. I wanted to kill somebody when I first saw it. You know? I mean, Charlie Kirk, I don't really care for the guy as much, but he nobody deserves to be shot like that. But now this blood coming out in chunks, I ain't buying it. No. That's that's that's blood that's been bagged up, and it's ready for show. Speaker 1: Safety team is here. I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit. What the what the security detail just said. Push one, sir. Speaker 2: Now here's the aspect of Charlie Kirk being hauled away. There's no blood hitting the concrete. There's no blood on any of these individuals as I'll show later. But, again, there's a person filming up here. You'll notice a female standing here like a statue, also part of this filming, which I'll show a bit later as well. You get a better vantage point of her later on. And it's hard to see, but she's right there filming. There's a cop. And, again, all these people in play here, let's back up. And once again, we'll swing around here. If we can get that right position of that person, maybe they're over here more as the camera swings around. There's the cop in play, and again, I'm gonna get to that person up here. Position there to film all this. Now, this is an aspect I haven't shown from this angle yet. Again, I was pointing from this direction up this little hill, this area where this person is stationed. You can see that other goon over here in the corner position for this event. Make no mistake about it. He was there ready to capture the footage. Again, I'm gonna point out another female here standing like a statue to film it all as well. This is a 100% production. Anybody that can't see it, they're completely blind. Let's move this forward here. Now I'm gonna play the video, then I'll play it in slow motion. Let's get right to playing the actual video. Now really important to mention here, as I play in slow motion, this is panned out. It's gonna pan in a bit. But you see Charlie Kirk being hauled away, and nobody's, like, has a towel or shirt covering his neck. Nothing of the sort. There's no blood on these individuals. No blood pouring on the ground like we saw pouring out. That's because the blood pack was fully emptied, and that's why you don't see any more blood dripping. It's just on his shirt. This gets the aspect as well. Many aspects as far as the so called bulletproof vest that many claim he was wearing, there is none. K. Let's move this forward here a bit. Now look at this woman here standing like a statue with a with a cell phone filming only in this direction. They don't wanna get a close-up of Charlie Kirk at all. She's told to stand this direction. You're gonna see a female run through here, put her hand in front of her mouth, and tell her something like, hey. Let's get out of here. Let's go. We've done our job. It's time to move forward. But the here, you see the female moving here. Now watch what she does here as you see Charlie Kirk. I'm gonna get a better vantage point of close-up of this. But first off, I wanna show this female passing by this woman. And why why wouldn't she film here? Why isn't she filming Charlie Kirk? She's filming this direction. Again, they don't wanna get a close-up of what's really happening, and that's the point of filming only in this direction. Make no mistake about it. This person is here to only film in this direction. I'll get a little bit of a close-up later. Let's zoom in here. Now watch this female cover her mouth and tells her some, hey. Okay. Let's go. And there she goes. They both take off. Okay, these are all part all these people are part of the production. Let's play that again as the woman comes over and swings over as she's only filming this way to really emphasize these points. And there she goes. She puts her hand over about hey. Let's get out of here. It's time to go. Let's go, and she goes. This is more of a close-up. We're gonna get more and more close ups as we move forward. Really important to point out every aspect and really seal the deal with this fake phony show. Again, there's the guy, the goon up here filming. Hired help. Just like the person filming here is hired help. Now look at here. We get more of a close-up, but you're gonna see this is Charlie Kirk, and he doesn't have a bulletproof vest as the shirt is pulled up. You do so you do see fake blood on the white shirt, but nothing's pouring no blood on any of these individuals that are carrying him. Speaker 3: I'm I'm believing he's still alive. Okay? Now these Freemasons, Charlie, he's a Freemason. These guys have a habit of staging their own deaths. They do it all the time, constantly. And then they reappear as somebody else. Okay? And don't even get started on that because that rabbit hole will take you months to get down and figure out who's all who. And it would be worth your investigation, but it does take a long time. Anyway, here we are. Charlie's, you know, had a has a good reason to false flag. Okay? Very good reason. Well, the number one reason is that he's a Freemason, and that's who that's who who does the false flags. Most of them. And all this is is a show after a reaction and, you know, there was people on the scene, of course, there always is, that makes the noises. Speaker 2: Oh, Speaker 3: woah. You know? To help us with our anger and fear. Fear and anger. That's what they want. Speaker 1: So and that everything all the ingredients are there to be Speaker 3: a false flag. Okay? Very good one, though. And Charlie is a good actor. Alright? And I'm glad that he's still alive. And whoever he turns out to be, we'll find out.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

@P_2_the_J I don't think I've ever seen bots flood in with such precision/cohesion on any other topic in my social media career. You know what that means 🎯

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

@omberzonk After keeping the masses distracted with an entire CLUE set full of planted suspects, they will attempt to wind it down by closing the last loop. We must keep spreading truth like wildfire to stop that from happening. https://t.co/5Dfsp2GAKo

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

@YeauhRahide except for this lil part 😜 https://t.co/OGFdOwUTaM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

@KooFoo238208 💯

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

@1yahoouh It's almost as if all the videos we got were garbage quality precisely so we'd spend all of our time arguing about whether or not different clumps of pixels were reliable in proving ANY of our theories 🤔🤔

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

@JunLaw2020 We are many levels past that, my friend. Get caught up here 👇 https://t.co/j7Fg54QWob

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Was The Charlie Kirk Assassination FAKED? Full Breakdown https://t.co/op3xHdjSFt

Video Transcript AI Summary
Conspiracy commentators argue Charlie Kirk’s assassination was staged, citing inconsistencies: "the rifle's gonna be hot" and "this barrel broken down does not fit in his backpack"—"this is a gigantic backpack"—and "the rifle stock... doesn't fit." They claim "this is a necklace, not a bulletproof vest." They say "the blood... comes out in chunks" and that "the blood pack was fully emptied" with "no blood hitting the concrete" or on the carriers. They describe "a 100% production" with "hired help" and a "female... standing like a statue" filming in one direction, plus a moment where a woman "puts her hand over [her] mouth" and says "Let’s go, it’s time to go." They invoke "a tool filled with red liquid and remote controlled mini explosives" and call it "the magic of cinema." They also claim "Charlie's a Freemason" and that the event is a "false flag."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What the fuck is this piece of shit? On this episode, you might be a dumb motherfucker. This k? Or the fact that he disassembled this after taking a shot, which the rifle's gonna be hot. They found no gloves. There's just so many inconsistencies that just makes zero sense. I mean, I'm still working on this, and I have taken this rifle apart a thousand times. Now he has to put the pieces of the rifle into a backpack, and this is a gigantic backpack. That I will pack best backpacks in the fucking plane. Anyways, as you can see, this barrel broken down does not fit in his backpack, and this is a big boy, way bigger than one he was carrying. K? I put the rifle stock in here, guess what? It doesn't fit. It sticks out. Now let's just say for sake of argument that he put these in his pant leg as he's walking. These are still so long broken down that he would not be able to walk straight. He wouldn't be able to bend his legs. Doesn't make fucking sense. Speaker 1: Love you, Charlie. Thank you. Thank you. This is in the restroom. I'll be right back. You're good. Bye, everyone. Speaker 2: I'm gonna play this and pause the point where you can see clearly, once again, this is a necklace and not some bulletproof vest. Let's take a look. Let me back this up here just a tad, and you're gonna see. Move this around. Move this forward. And clearly, this is a necklace, not a bulletproof vest. Speaker 1: People are arguing that Charlie Kirk's assassination might be fake. He leans over, and you can see that there's something right there in his shirt, something dark. And then as the video goes on Mom, mom went in there to help her and noticed she had vomited off some kind of blackish material. It really looks almost white. He bend he begins bleeding from that exact area. Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. Speaker 1: You see the t shirt do that the air thing? Look where the blood comes from. Out of the t shirt. You see that? Out of the t shirt. You can see it happen. He popped a squib, bro. He did. He popped a squib. Holy fuck. They got me at first. Yeah. It looks fake as fuck. I worked in Jacksonville from '85 through '88, and we averaged about a gunshot wound every day. So it would leave you three or four days during the week to have nobody shot, and then the weekends would make up for it. There'd be, like, three or four gunshots that come in. And we would go get them in Speaker 3: the helicopter. Now I did bleeding that goes on with gunshot wounds and this one with Charlie. Now remember now, this blood that is supposedly coming out, this blood is is cleaned cleaned up, it's oxygenized and it's headed for the brain. Now in the brain there's all kinds of capillaries and the blood goes down to one molecule. Okay? One cell. Okay? Then it goes in and makes this change of oxygen to carbon dioxide. Then it comes out blue blood and heads back to the, heart and lungs. It's about as thin and it's prepared for these capillaries in the brain to make the swap. Okay. Now this is the I mean this blood has to be at its best. Okay. It has to be thin, fit through one cell at a time and, or you got problems. It's called a stroke. I wanna show you what I found as far as, how did this happen to Charlie? Speaker 4: Two bullets lodged in his chest, but he stood still, expressionless. This is not a story about a man who is bulletproof. This is the magic of cinema. With a special tool filled with red liquid and remote controlled mini explosives, the effects of blood and gunshot wounds are made to look real. Speaker 1: Not counting gang violence. Great. Speaker 3: Okay. If you Speaker 1: if it Speaker 3: if you didn't see it or it doesn't make sense to you, what I'm getting at is this blood that has been prepared by your body for your brain to go in through those capillaries. It would be it would be a death sentence to have that blood in chunks, and that's what it is here is. It's coming out in chunks like it's already coagulated. I would say that the guy's already dead over a day. Okay? Because blood doesn't come out in chunks. It squirts out possibly, arterial blood especially, but it doesn't do that. It doesn't come out in chunks. This is this is definitely some trickery going on, and that's this looks exactly like it does in the movies when they need somebody shot in the chest. Okay? And I, you know, I hate to I hate to burst your bubble because I I had the same reaction. I wanted to kill somebody when I first saw it. You know? I mean, Charlie Kirk, I don't really care for the guy as much, but he nobody deserves to be shot like that. But now this blood coming out in chunks, I ain't buying it. No. That's that's that's blood that's been bagged up, and it's ready for show. Speaker 1: Safety team is here. I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit. What the what the security detail just said. Push one, sir. Speaker 2: Now here's the aspect of Charlie Kirk being hauled away. There's no blood hitting the concrete. There's no blood on any of these individuals as I'll show later. But, again, there's a person filming up here. You'll notice a female standing here like a statue, also part of this filming, which I'll show a bit later as well. You get a better vantage point of her later on. And it's hard to see, but she's right there filming. There's a cop. And, again, all these people in play here, let's back up. And once again, we'll swing around here. If we can get that right position of that person, maybe they're over here more as the camera swings around. There's the cop in play, and again, I'm gonna get to that person up here. Position there to film all this. Now, this is an aspect I haven't shown from this angle yet. Again, I was pointing from this direction up this little hill, this area where this person is stationed. You can see that other goon over here in the corner position for this event. Make no mistake about it. He was there ready to capture the footage. Again, I'm gonna point out another female here standing like a statue to film it all as well. This is a 100% production. Anybody that can't see it, they're completely blind. Let's move this forward here. Now I'm gonna play the video, then I'll play it in slow motion. Let's get right to playing the actual video. Now really important to mention here, as I play in slow motion, this is panned out. It's gonna pan in a bit. But you see Charlie Kirk being hauled away, and nobody's, like, has a towel or shirt covering his neck. Nothing of the sort. There's no blood on these individuals. No blood pouring on the ground like we saw pouring out. That's because the blood pack was fully emptied, and that's why you don't see any more blood dripping. It's just on his shirt. This gets the aspect as well. Many aspects as far as the so called bulletproof vest that many claim he was wearing, there is none. K. Let's move this forward here a bit. Now look at this woman here standing like a statue with a with a cell phone filming only in this direction. They don't wanna get a close-up of Charlie Kirk at all. She's told to stand this direction. You're gonna see a female run through here, put her hand in front of her mouth, and tell her something like, hey. Let's get out of here. Let's go. We've done our job. It's time to move forward. But the here, you see the female moving here. Now watch what she does here as you see Charlie Kirk. I'm gonna get a better vantage point of close-up of this. But first off, I wanna show this female passing by this woman. And why why wouldn't she film here? Why isn't she filming Charlie Kirk? She's filming this direction. Again, they don't wanna get a close-up of what's really happening, and that's the point of filming only in this direction. Make no mistake about it. This person is here to only film in this direction. I'll get a little bit of a close-up later. Let's zoom in here. Now watch this female cover her mouth and tells her some, hey. Okay. Let's go. And there she goes. They both take off. Okay, these are all part all these people are part of the production. Let's play that again as the woman comes over and swings over as she's only filming this way to really emphasize these points. And there she goes. She puts her hand over about hey. Let's get out of here. It's time to go. Let's go, and she goes. This is more of a close-up. We're gonna get more and more close ups as we move forward. Really important to point out every aspect and really seal the deal with this fake phony show. Again, there's the guy, the goon up here filming. Hired help. Just like the person filming here is hired help. Now look at here. We get more of a close-up, but you're gonna see this is Charlie Kirk, and he doesn't have a bulletproof vest as the shirt is pulled up. You do so you do see fake blood on the white shirt, but nothing's pouring no blood on any of these individuals that are carrying him. Speaker 3: I'm I'm believing he's still alive. Okay? Now these Freemasons, Charlie, he's a Freemason. These guys have a habit of staging their own deaths. They do it all the time, constantly. And then they reappear as somebody else. Okay? And don't even get started on that because that rabbit hole will take you months to get down and figure out who's all who. And it would be worth your investigation, but it does take a long time. Anyway, here we are. Charlie's, you know, had a has a good reason to false flag. Okay? Very good reason. Well, the number one reason is that he's a Freemason, and that's who that's who who does the false flags. Most of them. And all this is is a show after a reaction and, you know, there was people on the scene, of course, there always is, that makes the noises. Speaker 2: Oh, Speaker 3: woah. You know? To help us with our anger and fear. Fear and anger. That's what they want. Speaker 1: So and that everything all the ingredients are there to be Speaker 3: a false flag. Okay? Very good one, though. And Charlie is a good actor. Alright? And I'm glad that he's still alive. And whoever he turns out to be, we'll find out.
Saved - September 20, 2025 at 10:36 AM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Was The Charlie Kirk Assassination FAKED? Full Breakdown https://t.co/op3xHdjSFt

Video Transcript AI Summary
On this episode, speakers scrutinize Charlie Kirk's alleged assassination, citing inconsistencies like the rifle disassembly and oversized backpack that supposedly couldn't hold the parts, suggesting the scene is staged. They inspect video frames, arguing that "this is a necklace, not a bulletproof vest" is visible. They claim blood during the event appears pre-coagulated and not physically plausible, saying: "blood... coming out in chunks like it's already coagulated" and "the blood pack was fully emptied." They assert "This is a 100% production" and accuse a filming team and "hired help" positioned to film only certain angles, noting a woman "standing like a statue" and another "tell her something... let's go" moments. They claim "People are arguing that Charlie Kirk's assassination might be fake" and allege "Freemasons" run staging and "false flags" operations. They insist "I'm glad that he's still alive" and speculate about identity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What the fuck is this piece of shit? Speaker 1: On this episode, you might be a dumb motherfucker. This k? Or the fact that he disassembled this after taking a shot, which the rifle's gonna be hot. They found no gloves. There's just so many inconsistencies that just makes zero sense. I mean, I'm still working on this, and I have taken this rifle apart a thousand times. Now he has to put the pieces of the rifle into a backpack, and this Speaker 0: is a gigantic backpack. That I will pack best backpacks in Speaker 1: the fucking plane. Anyways, as you can see, this barrel broken down does not fit in his backpack, and this is a big boy, way bigger than one he was carrying. K? I put the rifle stock in here, guess what? It doesn't fit. It sticks out. Now let's just say for sake Speaker 0: of argument that he put these in his pant leg as he's walking. Speaker 1: These are still so long broken Speaker 0: down that he would not be able to walk straight. Speaker 1: He wouldn't be able to bend his legs. Doesn't make fucking sense. Speaker 2: Love you, Charlie. Thank you. Thank you. This is in the restroom. I'll be right back. You're good. Bye, everyone. Speaker 3: I'm gonna play this and pause the point where you can see clearly, once again, this is a necklace and not some bulletproof vest. Let's take a look. Let me back this up here Speaker 4: just a tad, and you're gonna see. Speaker 5: Move this around. Move this forward. And clearly, this is Speaker 3: a necklace, not a bulletproof vest. Speaker 2: People are arguing that Charlie Kirk's assassination might be fake. He leans over, and you can see that there's something right there in his shirt, something dark. And then as the video goes on Mom, mom went in there to help her and noticed she had vomited off some kind of blackish material. It really looks almost white. He bend he begins bleeding from that exact area. Okay. Okay. You see the t shirt do that the air thing? Look where the blood comes from. Out of the t shirt. You see that? Out of the t shirt. You can see it happen. He popped a squib, bro. He did. He popped a squib. Holy fuck. They got me at first. Yeah. It looks fake as fuck. Speaker 0: I worked in Jacksonville from '85 through '88, and we averaged about a gunshot wound every day. So it would leave you three or four days during the week to have nobody shot, and then the weekends would make up for it. There'd be, like, three or four gunshots that come in. And we would go get them in the helicopter. Now I did bleeding that goes on with gunshot wounds and this one with Charlie. Now remember now, this blood that is supposedly coming out, this blood is is cleaned cleaned up, it's oxygenized and it's headed for the brain. Now in the brain there's all kinds of capillaries and the blood goes down to one molecule. Okay? One cell. Okay? Then it goes in and makes this change of oxygen to carbon dioxide. Then it comes out blue blood and heads back to the, heart and lungs. It's about as thin and it's prepared for these capillaries in the brain to make the swap. Okay. Now this is the I mean this blood has to be at its best. Okay. It has to be thin, fit through one cell at a time and, or you got problems. It's called a stroke. I wanna show you what I found as far as, how did this happen to Charlie? Speaker 6: Two bullets lodged in his chest, but he stood still, expressionless. This is not a story about a man who is bulletproof. This is the magic of cinema. With a special tool filled with red liquid and remote controlled mini explosives, the effects of blood and gunshot wounds are made to look real. Speaker 2: Not counting gang violence. Great. Speaker 0: Okay. If you if it if you didn't see it or it doesn't make sense to you, what I'm getting at is this blood that has been prepared by your body for your brain to go in through those capillaries. It would be it would be a death sentence to have that blood in chunks, and that's what it is here is. It's coming out in chunks like it's already coagulated. I would say that the guy's already dead over a day. Okay? Because blood doesn't come out in chunks. It squirts out possibly, arterial blood especially, but it doesn't do that. It doesn't come out in chunks. This is this is definitely some trickery going on, and that's this looks exactly like it does in the movies when they need somebody shot in the chest. Okay? And I, you know, I hate to I hate to burst your bubble because I I had the same reaction. I wanted to kill somebody when I first saw it. You know? I mean, Charlie Kirk, I don't really care for the guy as much, but he nobody deserves to be shot like that. But now this blood coming out in chunks, I ain't buying it. No. That's that's that's blood that's been bagged up, and it's ready for show. Speaker 2: Safety team is here. I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit. What the what the security detail just said. Push one, sir. Speaker 3: Now here's the aspect of Charlie Kirk being hauled away. There's no blood hitting the concrete. There's no blood on any of these individuals as I'll show later. But, again, there's a person filming up here. You'll notice a female standing here like a statue, also part of this filming, which I'll show a bit later as well. You get a better vantage point of her later on. And it's hard to see, but she's right there filming. There's a cop. And, again, all these people in play here, let's back up. And once again, we'll swing around here. If we can get that right position of that person, maybe they're over here more as the camera swings around. There's the cop in play, and again, I'm gonna get to that person up here. Position there to film all this. Now, this is an aspect I haven't shown from this angle yet. Again, I was pointing from this direction up this little hill, this area where this person is stationed. You can see that other goon over here in the corner position for this event. Make no mistake about it. He was there ready to capture the footage. Again, I'm gonna point out another female here standing like a statue to film it all as well. This is a 100% production. Anybody that can't see it, they're completely blind. Let's move this forward here. Now I'm gonna play the video, then I'll play it in slow motion. Let's get right to playing the actual video. Now really important to mention here, as I play in slow motion, this is panned out. It's gonna pan in a bit. But you see Charlie Kirk being hauled away, and nobody's, like, has a towel or shirt covering his neck. Nothing of the sort. There's no blood on these individuals. No blood pouring on the ground like we saw pouring out. That's because the blood pack was fully emptied, and that's why you don't see any more blood dripping. It's just on his shirt. This gets the aspect as well. Many aspects as far as the so called bulletproof vest that many claim he was wearing, there is none. K. Let's move this forward here a bit. Now look at this woman here standing like a statue with a with a cell phone filming only in this direction. They don't wanna get a close-up of Charlie Kirk at all. She's told to stand this direction. You're gonna see a female run through here, put her hand in front of her mouth, and tell her something like, hey. Let's get out of here. Let's go. We've done our job. It's time to move forward. But the here, you see the female moving here. Now watch what she does here as you see Charlie Kirk. I'm gonna get a better vantage point of close-up of this. But first off, I wanna show this female passing by this woman. And why why wouldn't she film here? Why isn't she filming Charlie Kirk? She's filming this direction. Again, they don't wanna get a close-up of what's really happening, and that's the point of filming only in this direction. Make no mistake about it. This person is here to only film in this direction. I'll get a little bit of a close-up later. Let's zoom in here. Now watch this female cover her mouth and tells her some, hey. Okay. Let's go. And there she goes. They both take off. Okay, these are all part all these people are part of the production. Let's play that again as the woman comes over and swings over as she's only filming this way to really emphasize these points. And there she goes. She puts her hand over about hey. Let's get out of here. It's time to go. Let's go, and she goes. This is more of a close-up. We're gonna get more and more close ups as we move forward. Really important to point out every aspect and really seal the deal with this fake phony show. Again, there's the guy, the goon up here filming. Hired help. Just like the person filming here is hired help. Now look at here. We get more of a close-up, but you're gonna see this is Charlie Kirk, and he doesn't have a bulletproof vest as the shirt is pulled up. You do so you do see fake blood on the white shirt, but nothing's pouring no blood on any of these individuals that are carrying him. Speaker 0: I'm I'm believing he's still alive. Okay? Now these Freemasons, Charlie, he's a Freemason. These guys have a habit of staging their own deaths. They do it all the time, constantly. And then they reappear as somebody else. Okay? And don't even get started on that because that rabbit hole will take you months to get down and figure out who's all who. And it would be worth your investigation, but it does take a long time. Anyway, here we are. Charlie's, you know, had a has a good reason to false flag. Okay? Very good reason. Well, the number one reason is that he's a Freemason, and that's who that's who who does the false flags. Most of them. And all this is is a show after a reaction and, you know, there was people on the scene, of course, there always is, that makes the noises. Speaker 3: Oh, Speaker 0: woah. You know? To help us with our anger and fear. Fear and anger. That's what they want. So and that everything all the ingredients are there to be a false flag. Okay? Very good one, though. And Charlie is a good actor. Alright? And I'm glad that he's still alive. And whoever he turns out to be, we'll find out.
Saved - September 18, 2025 at 5:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I notice that many are rushing to accept the narratives surrounding the Charlie Kirk case without addressing significant unanswered questions. I've pointed out strange anomalies in the viral video, like Charlie's ring changing fingers and the odd behavior of the bullet hole. Additionally, eyewitness accounts and new footage suggest inconsistencies in the story. I'm raising concerns about the lack of medical response and the peculiar timing of events surrounding the incident. It feels like we're being fed a narrative that deserves deeper scrutiny. Always question everything.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

99.99% of people on this platform are SPRINTING through each new narrative being fed to them by the Gov. agencies regarding the Charlie Kirk case, while there are still HUGE unanswered questions lingering from the very first day of this fiasco. STOP, take a deep breath to collect your emotions, and watch the short video I've attached below, which analyzes 2 clips: 1) The insanely viral close-up one that everyone has seen 2) The left-side angle, which is extremely HARD to find, as everywhere it pops up, it quickly gets censored/scrubbed (we'll dive more into WHY below) But before digging into that second video, let's review the first one, as there are multiple strange things about it (and yes I know many of you have already heard the hand-wavey explanations on the anomalies and moved on, but bear with me, the second video is where things really get weird): 1) Charlie's ring appears to switch from his RING finger to his PINKY finger before and after the shot 2) The letter F appears to disappear then reappear on his shirt, in a flashy way that doesn't look like it's from natural shirt folds 3) There's a strange black dot on the top-right of Charlie's shirt, which appears to jump diagonally up and over to the spot where the bullet hole ends up on his neck (??) 4) In the frames following the appearance of the bullet hole in his neck, the hole itself appears to shift unnaturally side-to-side. (Watch the bullet mark in the video very closely in the frames after it appears, and you'll see it) NOW, the consensus explanation that people whipped up to explain all of this weirdness is, "This video was modified by AI either automatically by the phone camera, or manually afterward to 'enhance' it." Ok...first of all, can we acknowledge that it is CRAZY that the entire world has completely agreed that we will fully-trust a single video as the end-all be-all of the investigation, when it shows clear signs of being MANIPULATED in some way? The only other video that was circulating for that first 24 hours was that SUPER zoomed-out one, where you can't see anything clearly. The close-up one, where all of these weird anomalies exist, is THE ONLY VIDEO that clearly shows the gunshot wound. (At a 3,000+ person event! With security cameras all over the place!) Yet practically everyone on Earth has completely put a bow on the whole thing—one of the most significant events of our lifetime—from that single video alone. That is INSANE to me. But anyways... Before we look at the second video, I want you to take note on how in the first one—which we've seen a billion times now—the blood from the bullet wound very clearly gushes DOWNWARD from the hole in the neck, which appears a couple inches above the collar line of Charlie's shirt Remember that. Alright, it's time to take a look at the second video. From what we can tell, it was organically-recorded by an onlooking crowd member, and is NOT manipulated by A.I. What do we notice in it? How about that we see something COMPLETELY DIFFERENT than in the giga-viral one...The blood appears to be coming UP AND OUT from the collar line of his shirt, not out of a hole in his neck!? Oh, and did I mention you can see a mysterious black object INSIDE his shirt from this angle as well? ??? Think back to that crazy first day of this circus. Do you remember how the eyewitness accounts coming out of the event were ALL SAYING that they saw Charlie get shot in the CHEST? And us keyboard warriors at home thought that was weird, because we saw THAT VIDEO! And by golly it showed a hole in his neck right there, so that has to be the truth, right? No person or agency has ever manipulated a video and boosted it to the algorithm high-heavens to create a false narrative, and invoke an intended emotional reaction in the masses, right?? I'm sure the reason why it was boosted by every platform's algorithms simultaneously (more than any viral video I've seen in my entire life) couldn't possibly be because it was MISREPRESENTING anything in order to plant a manufactured image into people's brains...right?? Am I taking crazy pills, or do we need to make a return back to the drawing board here, until we know WTF is going on? I know @RyanMattaMedia has been pushing to get the 1080p security camera footage, as—big surprise—all of it is being hidden from us. WHY is it being hidden from us? It's a good thing I'm not a crazy conspiracy theorist, otherwise I'd be suspicious that the reason why we're being so stonewalled from seeing ANY other video footage of the shot itself other than like 2 videos (from a 3,000 PERSON EVENT), is because something is being hidden from us, or things are being doctored behind the scenes to uphold a narrative. As I dove deep on in my previous "Charlie Kirk Questions" posts (I'll link them in the replies), it is CLEAR that we've been fed a full-course meal of bullshit on every turn of this timeline. The only question is, HOW BIG are the lies being told...and which lies were passively accepted by the masses during this media runaround we've been led on? I will leave it to you to decide exactly where that line is drawn. But I for one, still have a very fishy feeling about all of this. AS ALWAYS, question everything, and check out both of the "Questions" posts I wrote in the replies below, as what I've covered above is only the tip of the iceberg on what we are not being told about this story.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript describes a claim that Charlie Kirk's assassination might be fake, citing visual cues and a medical detail. "People are arguing that Charlie Kirk's assassination might be fake." "He leans over, and you can see that there's something right there in his shirt, something dark." "And then as the video goes on The mom went in there to help her and noticed she had vomited off some kind of blackish material." "It really looks almost like He bend he begins bleeding from that exact area that area." The overall content centers on perceived fakery, a dark mark on the shirt, a blackish material, and bleeding from a specific area.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People are arguing that Charlie Kirk's assassination might be fake. He leans over, and you can see that there's something right there in his shirt, something dark. And then as the video goes on The mom went in there to help her and noticed she had vomited off some kind of blackish material. It really looks almost like He bend he begins bleeding from that exact area that area.

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

#CharlieKirk QUESTIONS (Part 1) https://t.co/mMG9EbzNOd

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Alright, so... same disclaimer that everyone else is adding: "It's too early to know WTF happened, and what the details are, as none of us X keyboard warriors were there ourselves." Also, a reminder to turn your emotions OFF when digging for truth. Nobody's trying to hurt any feelings here, we're all doing our best to decipher the information we have, which sometimes requires us to dig well past initial reactions and remain open-minded to all possibilities, no matter how strange they may seem. That said...I have 2 questions for you: #1. Why did Charlie Kirk's ring visibly move from his ring finger to his pinkie finger after bullet impact? #2. Why does the "F" on his shirt disappear after bullet impact? Watch the video loop a few times. Are both of these weird anomalies just camera distortion - despite nothing else in the frame exhibiting such distortion? Or is something far more strange going on here?

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

#CharlieKirk QUESTIONS (Part 2) https://t.co/cJND4bySIb

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

NEW QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION (MORE ARE POPPING UP EVERY HOUR): An event 1/4 of this size with a nobody speaker would have ambulances immediately on scene for emergency situations like this. So why was Charlie Kirk instead stuffed into a predetermined SUV, that would have to follow traffic laws on the way to the hospital, with no medical supplies, no oxygen, and no medical personnel? He's carried there by 6 dudes (including the SAME 2 GUYS that were making the umpire hand signals seconds before the shot (white hat/white shirt guy and black shirt/black sunglasses guy) The black sunglasses guy also appears to be THE SAME PERSON that was on Trump's secret service team the day he was also shot...? (see attached pic) Nobody carrying Charlie is applying pressure to the neck wound as they run him to the car. Instead, they are just letting his head violently flop all over the place, the last thing you would do following a traumatic neck injury And despite the above carelessness with a gaping neck wound...there isn't a single drop of blood anywhere on the ground, his shoes, or any of the people carrying him 🤔 How come there are new camera angles of the shot emerging showing the blood coming out not from his neck...but from under his shirt, more in the upper-chest area? Many have forgotten that the eyewitness reports on the day of the event were saying they saw him get shot in the CHEST. The story didn't change to NECK until after those 2-3 videos we've all seen spread across the internet like wildfire, which as my original post demonstrated, had some pretty weird, potentially AI-looking inconsistencies (ring changing fingers, black dot on the top-right of his shirt moving diagonally up and seemingly BECOMING the bullet hole wound, the wound itself shifting slightly to the side when watching frame-by-frame, etc.) Could this have something to do with why some video-analyzing sleuths are spotting a black object inside the collar of Charlie's shirt, right in the area this blood is coming out in the above-mentioned angles? (See the attached video where I included clips of all of these new discoveries) Additionally, is it a complete coincidence that the freemasonic #33 has been spammed ALL OVER the event, AND the following investigation? Stacks of hats on the stage adding up to 33, supposed murderer driving 3 hours to get there, 3K people in attendance, "300 cases of politically-motivated violence since January 6th" being reported across Yahoo and other MSM outlets, manhunt lasting exactly 33 hours (Kash Patel even corrected himself after saying 36 hours, to make sure everyone heard 33 on the livestream), and many more such examples And ANOTHER coincidence, that the man they've pinned all of this on looks exactly like Lee Harvey Oswald, one of the most classic patsies in the history of US Government cinema? What about the Jew decoy they trotted out (George Zinn), who also just happens to be a key witness that reported seeing planes flying into the twin towers on 9/11/01, AND has connections to the Boston Marathon bombing? How did the supposed shooter—according to the official story we're being given—take apart the gun and stuff it in his backpack & pants in seconds (not possible according to experts), then escape the scene without being seen lugging around these giant gun parts, then REASSEMBLE THE GUN BACK TOGETHER AGAIN to leave it nicely in a box in the forest. What??? Passports found underneath the world trade center, anyone? Why was Kash Patel wining & dining at a "swanky Italian restaurant in NYC" just hours after Charlie—his self-proclaimed "best friend"—was brutally murdered live on the world stage? He has a private jet - why didn't he use it to go there and investigate? What are the odds that at the exact same time Charlie was shot, there was a big senate hearing going on regarding the Epstein files, in which they concluded they were not going to release them? (A convenient time for a distraction) What are the odds that Trump and Bibi Netanyahu—in completely different timezones and with completely different schedules—posted a "Pray for Charlie" tweet at the exact same time, to the minute? How was a book titled "The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk" published on Amazon on September 9th...then quickly taken down from the website? And what about that "Charlie Kirk Dead at 31" song posted on Soundcloud a month ago? Many have commented that, after watching the Erika Kirk TPUSA press conference video, they intuitively got weird vibes from it, sensing that it appears she is acting. I won't inject any personal opinion on this one - go watch it for yourself, and draw your own conclusions. ALL OF THIS SAID: It could not be any more blatantly obvious that whether or not all of the above bizarre occurrences are just incompetence, insane coincidences, or some mixture of the two, there is something very big going on behind the scenes here, and we've been fed a gigantic plate of lies over the last few days of unfolding events, with most of the internet is eating it up faster than Kash Patel at a swanky Italian restaurant in NYC. The only question is: how deep do the lies surrounding this situation go? (Watch the final attached video for many different levels of speculation, for you to come to your own conclusions on where you draw the line) Question everything. Always.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Gang violence. Right. Over the last ten years. Counting or not counting gang violence. Great.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gang violence. Right. Over the last ten years. Counting or not counting gang violence. Great.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Conspiracy claims circulated about George Zinn, with statements like: "George Zinn, the patsy that was arrested at the Charlie Kirk assassination, also saw nine 11. He saw the planes fly into the buildings and called that in and reported it. And then he also called in a fake terrorist attack at the Boston Marathon bombing and just so happened to get arrested at Charlie Kirk's event." Tess Keyser replies, "Grock is a guy really involved in all three events like this post claims." Grock states: "based on review of multiple sources, George Zinn was a witness to the nine eleven attacks, and he described seeing planes hit the towers. He was also arrested in 2013 for emailing a bomb threat joke to the Salt Lake City Marathon... He pled guilty to a terrorism charge and somehow magically only received probation." He adds, "there is no credible evidence that supports claims of his involvement in nine eleven's false flag facilitating Kirk's death or Mossad ties." The main suspect is "Tyler Robinson" and "he is in custody." A calculation notes: "Combined probability... equal to point seven zeros 5% or five times 10 to the power of eight... approximately one in two billion." On the Kirk shooting, claims include: "the guy's on the roof, takes the shot, disassembles the gun, stuffs it into his backpack and his pants, flees the scene, reassembles the gun, puts it in a box, and then drops it in the forest." References to "thirty three hours," numerology (33, 47, 11), Freemasons, the United Nations logo, and the line "It's all scripted. It's all an act. The world is a stage, and you are all falling for all of it." Also: custody timing statements like: "the suspect was taken into custody at 10PM local time in less than thirty six hours, thirty three to be precise."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now all you conspiracy theorists out there, I don't want you going crazy, but what are the odds that George Zinn, the patsy that was arrested at the Charlie Kirk assassination, also saw nine 11. He saw the planes fly into the buildings and called that in and reported it. And then he also called in a fake terrorist attack at the Boston Marathon bombing and just so happened to get arrested at Charlie Kirk's event. So Tess Keyser, she she responded to this tweet and she says, Grock is a guy really involved in all three events like this post claims. And Grock fact checks and goes, based on review of multiple sources, George Zinn was a witness to the nine eleven attacks, and he described seeing planes hit the towers. He was also arrested in 2013 for emailing a bomb threat joke to the Salt Lake City Marathon shortly after the Boston bombing. He pled guilty to a terrorism charge and somehow magically only received probation. He was also detained and questioned as a person of interest at the Charlie Kirk assassination on 09/10/2025, but released without charges relating to the shooting. Then Grock went on and made sure that it told you, there is no credible evidence that supports claims of his involvement in nine eleven's false flag facilitating Kirk's death or Mossad ties. The main suspect in Kirk's killing is now Tyler Robinson and he is in custody. So I asked Rock to break this one down for us and it says so, and it wouldn't give me an answer first. It's it's impossible to calculate. I said use statistical probability and give me a ball ballpark stat on the probability of him being at all three major events. And it goes through here and it breaks it down. And we get down here to the very bottom where it combines the probability right here. Combined probability. And it says it is equal to point seven zeros 5% or five times 10 to the power of eight. That translates to approximately one in two billion. Does all of that seem normal to you? Speaker 1: Alright. This is the 22 year old suspect seen jumping off the roof that was arrested. And I have one question, guys. Where is the rifle? Well, I'm gonna tell you exactly what they're telling us. Now they're saying he removed the barrel from the Mauser and fit the receiver in the mount in his backpack. And then the barrel was placed in his pants. Now I've heard some gun experts speak about this, and they say that this is not an easy thing to do. Removing this barrel does not happen quickly, and apparently, happened in two seconds before he jumped off the roof. And then this weapon was found assembled in the woods in a box. So let me get this straight. The official story here. Okay? The guy's on the roof, takes the shot, disassembles the gun, stuffs it into his backpack and his pants, flees the scene, gets away from everyone, reassembles the gun, puts it in a box, and then drops it in the forest. Kinda reminded me of the story where they found the passports near the World Trade Center. Genuinely, guys, are we actually supposed to believe this? Does this make any sense to you? Why would someone fleeing from a murder scene, trying to get away, stop to reassemble the weapon again, put it in a box, and then just dispose of it in the forest where someone could find it? Professional enough to evade authorities after being spotted and reported by multiple people in one of the biggest crime scenes in recent American history. Someone with a half a brain wanna try to explain that to me? Because none of this shit is making any sense. There is no chance that this guy should even got away from this scene. This whole thing has been signed, sealed, and stamped by the parasites at the top. Literally cannot get any more obvious at this point. Took them exactly thirty three hours to get this guy. Thirty three hours. Thirty three hours. Yep. Okay. You know when you put the word neck in Gematria, it equals thirty three? Trump's first day in office to September 10 is exactly thirty three weeks and three days. From Charlie Kirk's birthday to September 10, forty seven weeks. Forty seven's chilling here. Four plus seven in numerology is 11. 11 plus 11 plus 11 is 33. Freemason compass, the thirty third degree Freemasons, the highest ranking Freemasons in the world that can't control everything. This is the compass they use and it's 47 degrees. Didn't take them thirty one hours. Didn't take them thirty four hours or thirty two. It's thirty three hours exactly. Okay. Guys recognize this logo? The the United Nations, the the people that control our world, our whole entire world. They pass bills and laws that we don't even get a say in. How many sections that they've sectioned this off? 33. Flat Earth Math two, by the way. Just another way to laugh at you. When are you guys gonna realize that it's all scripted? When are you gonna wake up? Need to come together and rise up. Speaker 2: If you seriously think Charlie Kirk was actually speaking out for the greater good, then you have no idea how the world actually works. Here's him right here praying to that wall. We all know what that wall is. He made an oath because he's not serving the people. He's serving the people in charge of the world. He's a freemason. So look at the three hats that they had there. 47 well, four plus seven is 11, then 11 times three is 33. Thirty third degree Freemasonry. Could that just be a coincidence? I don't think so. There's really no coincidences when it comes to everything we see in the media. It's all scripted. It's all an act. The world is a stage, and you are all falling for all of it. Freedom broken down in reverse numerology, the full reduction is 33, and he was wearing a shirt that says freedom. Do you think that's predictive programming? Maybe I'm being far fetched, but have you seen the videos where he's being interviewed and the guy's like, hypothetically, if you were to be killed, what would you want your legacy to be like? And it was, like, not that long before it actually happened. Yeah. Everyone in office, they're all frauds. They are serving the big boy billionaires. That's why Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates are sitting there with, oh, Trump. I wonder what they're talking about. They're all frauds. They're all freemasons. And if you don't wake up, we will inevitably be led into total enslavement. Apparently, the person who shot Charlie Kirk was found. They've arrested him, and now they're advocating for the death penalty. But he was found thirty three hours after the incident. Exactly thirty three hours after. Speaker 3: And just last night, the suspect was taken into custody at 10PM local time in less than thirty six hours, thirty three to be precise. Thanks to the full weight of the federal government and leading out with the partners here in the state of Utah. Speaker 2: They're telling us right to our faces that this is a script. This is a movie. We are essentially watching a movie. And see that guy? Doesn't he look oddly familiar to the killer that we just found? Well, that's the guy who apparently shot JFK. I'm not saying it's the exact same person, but the facial symmetry is right there. It's in our faces that they have been playing the same script over and over and over again. Speaker 4: Do mind do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last ten years? Houncin What? Do you how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last ten years? Counting or not? Can I do you know how many matchmakers there have been in America over the last ten years? Counting. Can I do you know how many matchmakers there have been in America over the last ten years? Counting. Can I do you know? Speaker 5: We a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay. We're the directors, we're the producers, we're the main actors, and the world is our stage. Speaker 6: People are arguing that Charlie Kirk's assassination might be fake. He leans over, and you can see that there's something right there in his shirt, something dark. And then as the video goes on Speaker 4: the mom went in there to help her and noticed she had vomited off some kind of blackish material. It really looks almost white. Speaker 6: He bend he begins bleeding from that exact area. Speaker 4: So Speaker 6: when I Speaker 7: start to cut, this is where I had that situation where I had an extra freak out on set. This is always the, I think a very nerve wracking piece because you don't exactly know for sure that you are in the right place and also you know you are using a pair of live scissors next to an actor and the whole crew are watching sometimes and you're a little bit nervous. I just need to turn a little towards Mike. These are a very, very fine pointed scissor. They snip through foam really, really well. And also they've got a lot of control over the blade. It's a little bit lower than I wanted to be but that's actually not a bad thing. Regarding the the pale color of the foam on the inside, some people like to paint that red. I don't. Your flesh is naturally white inside. I bring you back to this position. And I kind of like the white because it's going to go red very very quickly and I like that. I really do. Like this. And Mike, can you drop your head down? Just relax. See, it's almost like I can finger the wound back in. It's almost like it's un undetectable. Speaker 2: Three, two, one. Speaker 4: Creating this hit took an air pressurized

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

Alright, so... same disclaimer that everyone else is adding: "It's too early to know WTF happened, and what the details are, as none of us X keyboard warriors were there ourselves." Also, a reminder to turn your emotions OFF when digging for truth. Nobody's trying to hurt any

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman

@CitySlicker222 I listened to part of it - did he confirm he's definitely a gun owner?

Saved - June 4, 2024 at 4:33 AM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman 🦍⚡️🥩

http://GMESQUEEZE.COM

Video Transcript AI Summary
GameStop's short interest and the correlation with Citadel's securities are analyzed in this video. The speaker calculates the number of shares that Citadel was short at the time, which aligns with the reported 226% short position. The speaker also examines the price of GameStop and the volume of short selling during the peak run in January 2021, concluding that shorts did not close during that time. The speaker further discusses the financial statements of Citadel in 2022 and 2023, showing that their short position grew. Insider trades and the timeline of events, including Ryan Cohen's involvement, are also mentioned. The speaker believes that GameStop is approaching profitability and that shorts have not closed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay, Internet. GameStop Thesis. Let's go. Shorts never closed. Okay. GameStop short interest. As of February 9, 2021, 226 percent short interest flow or shares trading, 69,750,000. Okay. Exhibit 1, we're gonna move over here. We're gonna do some math. Let's take a look at Citadel. Boom. Citadel securities, 2021. Okay. 2021, total assets, 80,000,000,000. Of those, 65,000,000,000 securities sold not yet purchased at fair value. Let's play a game. I'm gonna pretend that this entire short position is GameStop and we're gonna we're gonna try and and use math to calculate how many shares that they were short at the time and see if that correlates to that 226% short position. So, as of December 31, 2021, 65,000,000,000 securities sold not yet purchased at fair value. So let's go into Webull. December 31, 2021. GameStop opens at $38. High the day is $40. Low the day is $35. Close is 37.10. We all know reporting. So they obviously they did this reporting weeks in advance. So let's just take a look at the entire month of December and see what the and see what like the average price of GameStop was. So December 31st, opens 38, closes 37.10. The week prior opens 38, closes 38:0:4. The week prior opens 40, closes 38. The week prior opens 41, closes 39, the week prior, opens 51, closes 43. So you got a range, you know, it's you got about a range of 50 to 38. So we're gonna average it about 40 and we're gonna divide. Okay. Back to it. 65,000,000,000, securities sold not yet purchased divided by the price of GameStop during that month, average around 40 divided by 40 gets you 1,600,000,000, 1.625000000000 shares short. Okay? Now what we're going to do is we're going to divide that by the number of shares of GameStop that was trading. And let that with 69,750,000. So divided by 69123456. 69,750,000 shares. That was the outstanding shares of GameStop at the time. Boom. That gets you 232% short. Pretty close to that 220 6% short interest. And we all know they weren't entirely short GameStop. I'm sure they were short a few other stocks at the time as well, but we do know that they were heavily short GameStop. So those two numbers correlate. You have your 2 100 and 30 26% short position derived from that report. Here it is. Boom. This is figure 6 from the congressional report. You have, in red, short seller buy volume. In blue, total buy volume, and the dotted line is the price of GameStop. We're gonna go ahead and take a look at the peak date January 28, 2021 right here on this line. You can see the GameStop peaked over $400 per share and you can see during that entire peak run, there was virtually no short selling buy volume. There was virtually not even as much buy volume as the regular buy volume as the previous days. So we still don't fully understand what caused this price run, but what we do know is that it was not shorts closing because as you can see here in the red, there were short closing The short buying volume was virtually non existent during that run. Okay. So there's piece 1. Amount of shares that they were short during that time assuming that the entire position was short GameStop. Of course it wasn't but it's around this, you know, this this mark right here. So now I'm gonna open up another calculator and I'm gonna throw in those shares short and run 3 financial statement. 2022 on the left, 2023 on the right. So So as you can see in 2022, their total assets had shrunk by about 20,000,000,000. You could also see that their securities sold yet not yet purchased at fair value also shrunk by about 20,000,000,000. And we're gonna now correlate and see whether the price of GameStop at that point divided by that original number of shares that they had shorted was around that same value. So we're gonna take that shares, the amount of shares that they, they shorted that we calculated, originally right here. The 1,625,000,000,000 shares short. That original 200 and 26% short position. And we're gonna times this by the price of GameStop in December of 2022. So we're gonna go back to our Weebill chart here and we're in now December of 2022. December 30, 2022. GameStop opens at 1991, closes at 18:46. The week prior, December 23, 2022, GameStop opens at 20, closes at 20. The week prior to that, GameStop opens at 22 and closes at 20. The week prior to that, GameStop opens at 27 and closes at 22. And the week prior to that, GameStop opens at 25 and closes at 27. So the range you can see is between 2027. So we're gonna just average and say around 25. So now I'm gonna take these shares right here that they were originally short and I'm gonna times it by the price of GameStop during that month, the average price of Game GameStop during that month which is around $25. And boom, we get $40,000,000,000 Now we break out that Citadel report once more. And you can see 45,000,000,000. So that short position actually grew. And there's another relevant piece of data that confirms that that's accurate because, let's go ahead and take a look here. Short interest. Here we go. So every day since then, GameStop, the volume of GameStop has looked like this. 70% short 20, of all the volume of the shares that traded on 2/26, 2024, 70% of those shares were shorted. On all the volume, on 2/23, 61%. On all the volume, on 2/22, 60%. And as you can see, it has been like this consistently every day. There have maybe been 5 to 10 days in here where it has not been over 50%. And the lowest I had ever seen it is 40 2%. Ranging from 42 to about 47. And there was only about 5 of those days in here. Mathematically speaking, you cannot short this much of a float of the daily volume of, of shares trading and have short interest go down. The only possible way that this is is possible is if short interest goes up which we then see in Citadel's report. Where is it? 45,000,000,000, right? So originally, it was 40. It if the math was correct and that original short position was the same, it would be about 40. You can see it's at now 45. And again, showing that they have shorted more and now that number is more. Again, we're gonna just correlate and go back go back to that original number once more. That 16 25 number. We're gonna clear this. We're gonna paste this in here. We're gonna see if this actually correlates into 2023 as well. So you can see in 2023, again, their total assets had shrunk once more. So they started 2021 at 80, 2022 63 and now 2023, they're down to 52,000,000,000 in total assets. 27,000,000,000 of which securities sold not yet purchased at fair value. So we're gonna go ahead and take a look at the price of GameStop in December of 2023. And let's do that right now. Let's break it open into Webull and here we go. December 30th, 2023. GameStop opens at 1991. Oops, sorry. That's 2022. Here we go. 2023. December 29, 2023, GameStop opens at 16:98, closes at 17:53. Week prior, GameStop opens at 17, 24, closes at 16:97. Week prior, GameStop opens at 15:45, closes at 17:26. Week prior GameStop opens at 15:29, closes at 15:55. Week prior, GameStop opens at 12:18, closes at 15:30. So you can see the range is around from 12 to 18, 12 to 18, we're gonna average that at 15. So now we're gonna go ahead and take these shares right here, the original short position that they had and we're gonna times it by the price of GameStop. Average price of GameStop in December of 2023, and you get 24,000,000,000. And now once again, we're gonna go ahead and pull into Citadel's financial statement from 2023. And there it is. Security sold not yet purchased at fair value, 27,000,000,000. So again, up from that 24, 1,000,000,000 that we see here. Again, more proof that shorts never closed. Okay. So now you you have the amount of shares around that they shorted which is 1,625,000,000 which you can see that they never covered from the congressional report, as well as the correlation to their security sold not yet purchased and the price of GameStop during the time that it's trading in December of the, the year that they release that report. Sure it's never closed. Next stage, is the Fidelity buy sell ratio. So in that infidelity specifically, if you looked at GameStop which I did every day for the past 3 years, you would have noticed that GameStop looked like this. Where basically everybody is buying and nobody is selling. And there again, have been a few days in there where it was around close to 50%. Maybe a little bit even into the the heavier side. But there was maybe only 4, 5, 6 to 10 days total max out of the entire 3 years where it did not look like this. And so more relevant data showing you that people are buying the stock. Congressional report, there's Citadel. And now we have our timeline of events as well. So let's take a look at some more information here. Insider trades. GameStop's ported directors. I just listed the first three here. There's 2 others as well who also have been purchasing shares but I'm just gonna go ahead and show you the main three right here. This is from March of 2022 to September of 2023. These 3 have been doing nothing but buying up shares. And here are the price points where they bought it at. This is pre split so 9,399,499,399 is actually 16,000 at 94 divided by 4 at 2350, around 2350. So you can see that Lawrence Chang actually purchased another 16,000 shares at 2350 here. Ryan Cohen bought 400,000 at 90 What is that? 90 Let's say 97 divided by 4. Ryan Cohen bought another 400,000 shares at around 2425. And then Alan Atal, so it's 12929. 129 divided by 4 equals, 15 so it's 1500 times 3. 15. That's 45 100 shares at 3225. This is now post split, 5000 at 2280 purchased, another 443,000 at 2225 purchased from Ryan Cohen. Lawrence Cheng, another 5,000 purchased at 2238. Another 10,000 for Allen Atal, 2240. Another 4,768 for Lawrence Cheng at 1764. Another 15,000 for Allen Atal at 17/78. And another 1232 at 17/71 for Lawrence Chang. These insiders have been doing nothing but purchasing shares, of of the stock. And finally, we have the timeline of events. So what I did was I go ahead I fed chat gpt 10 years of Gamestop's financial data directly from their, investor relations, website. And I had it create me this chart of its sales and its income. And so I also happened to put some timelines of events that have happened. So in 20, 17, it's a GameStop CEO since 2010. Paul Raines resigns due to health reasons. I believe that this is around when the naked shorting begins, if not a little bit prior to this. And as you can see, GameStop after Paul, Raines resigns, goes from CEO to CEO to CEO to CEO to CEO every few months. This is when Boston Consulting Group enters the the picture and, they receive a terrible, advice on, you know, taking on a bunch of debt and not being able to pay it back. And as you can see, what's happening is their, their income is completely falling off a cliff along with their sales. And then here in 2021, is when Ryan Cohen makes, his purchase, his 10% ownership stake of GameStop, and fires everybody from the company, and then replaces them with people that were loyal to him from Chewy, people that he knew from Amazon, people that just a bunch of leading people in in the industry. And you can actually see that here in the GameStop's hire list. These are all the hires since Ryan Cohen took over the company. You can see a bunch of people that he snake, you know, brought from brought over from Chewy, snaked a bunch of people from Amazon, Zulily. And I think what's like a really really indicative here is like the types of positions that he's hiring. Like you'll see senior engineering managers on here a lot. You'll see data analysts on here a lot. You'll see blockchain and smart contracts on here a lot. You'll see software development engineers, lead engineers, cloud DevOps, head of blockchain, lead production blockchain, front developer, blockchain. They're just they're just taking all sorts of like tech positions, which doesn't seem relevant if you're just plan is to just keep opening up more Game Stops than being a brick and mortar, retail, you know, company. I I don't see what you need, you know, blockchain and, you know, the software engineers, and e commerce merchandising assistance. I I don't understand what that's about unless you're pivoting into a different direction, which is what I believe that they're currently doing. But there's just more relevant data there. And then, yes, finally back to the timeline of events. So I think that this position is unique. Because as you can see, since Ryan Cohen took over the company, their sales have, you know, stabilized. I would use the word stabilized. As of falling off of a cliff, they're no longer falling off of a cliff. They're still down trending a little bit, but they're definitely more stable than they were before Ryan Cohen took over the company. But the thing that's most important here is their income. As you can see, since Ryan Cohen took over the company, they have been approaching profitability. And we're waiting in earn earnings report now that is going to set us over the top, I believe, with this next earning. But what's interesting about this earning specifically is that it's timed with this run that seems to happen every March. One that I've tracked for the past 3 years. One that I don't fully have an explanation for, all I know is that something happens in March that causes volume to increase significantly as well as the price of the stock to fluctuate towards the upside. And we're gonna go ahead and take a look at the data points for that. March run. Right here. Okay. So here we go. This is March 12, 2021. You can see, GameStop opens at 3872 and the high for that day is $87.13. That is a 220% run. And that was March 12, 2021. Then we go to March 20 5th of 2022 where GameStop opens at 2250. Hits a high for the day of $39.54. Again, that is a 170% run. And then we move into March 24, 2023, GameStop opens, 1665 high for the day is $27. That is a 160% run as well. I think the most interesting thing about this this timeline of events is that Ryan Cohen seems to have timed this earnings release. Ryan Cohen seems to have timed this earnings release with, with the the March the March run, which my assumption for that would be, because that that would make the stock go up. And so this is all the data that I have. This is all the research that I've done. And this is my thesis is that GameStop is about to become profitable and shorts never closed. The end.
GameStop (GME): The Complete Guidebook for Smoothbrains The GME short squeeze you heard about in January? It hasn't started yet. BUCKLE UP for a crash course on everything you've missed 💎🙌🚀 benwehrman.com
Saved - May 16, 2024 at 8:09 PM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman ⚡️🦍🥩

Shorts never closed. Squeeze never squoze. Whole world's about to find out. $GME 💎🙌🚀 https://t.co/5CVU0udPDt

Saved - May 15, 2024 at 6:05 AM

@benwehrman - ₿en Wehrman ⚡️🦍🥩

It's a good day to re-watch my podcast with @peruvian_bull, explaining why $GME MOASS is inevitable 💎🙌🚀 https://youtu.be/bwOV51Ym2gA?si=SUNIQ815xy2UsES4

View Full Interactive Feed