TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @boriquagato

Saved - September 5, 2023 at 4:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The H1N1 scare exposed a weak virus and a harmful vaccine. We must learn from this and abandon mRNA and adenovirus vaccines. Crisis-driven media and pharma profit from fear. The 56 CFR claim is misleading, based on only 2 cases. Killing minks and rushing vaccine production for profit is unjust. The perpetual pandemic preparedness plan is a health failure. We must break the panic cycle and reject the same grifters. The answer is simple: stop falling for the scare con.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

the h1n1 scare was a scandal around a weak virus and a vaccine that had to be pulled off the market for harming people indeed, we do need to learn from the past, stop doing this, and abandon mRNA and adenovirus as failed vaccine modalities let's stop falling for fear porn.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

swine flu, h1n1, zika, dengue, ebola, monkeypox, there are an infinite number of hobgoblins waiting to audition to be the "new scary thing" and drive budgets. and we keep winding up in the same mess because crisis sells papers and pharma alike. h5n1 is just the latest model.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and calling this a 56% CFR is absurd when you're talking about 2 cases since 2015. these are obviously people with some congenital vulnerability or extreme immune issues. you cannot conclude anything meaningful about genpop from that. seems a badly misleading story inclusion.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and seriously, what is it with you germaphobes and always wanting to kill the minks? what did they ever do to you?

@boriquagato - el gato malo

all this "we need to be ready now to make a zillion doses of implausible vaxx using bad methods" is just pharma profiteering and now they want it in the food. but they pay big for ads. pay the piper, call the tune. and people wonder why no one trusts these outlets anymore...

@boriquagato - el gato malo

but at least it's not like that sort of rush job plan has ever caused problems before. oh, wait... https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/tthis-chicken-vaccine-makes-virus-dangerous

This chicken vaccine makes its virus more dangerous Scientists find experimental evidence for the first time that a vaccine can make a virus worse. pbs.org

@boriquagato - el gato malo

sourced from people with conflict of interest, sensational, and attention grabbing to lure readers and feather nests for sponsors. at a certain point, it just gets sad. https://t.co/nFkG6jTfSJ

@boriquagato - el gato malo

the track record of this "perpetual pandemic preparedness planning" is a debacle of health failure, regulatory and state capture, and tidy earnings for the companies that stoke the fear. but you can only go to this well so many times. then the well runs dry. https://t.co/VRvM6ggFSk

@boriquagato - el gato malo

the way to break the panic porn cycle is to stop falling for the "prepare for the new scary thing" con. this plan doesn't work and never has. it won't be better or smarter next time. it's going to be the same grift from the same grifters. and the answer is simple: https://t.co/Kn5kSb4M4l

Saved - September 5, 2023 at 4:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
California's decision to require EVs with car-to-grid capability as backup power is concerning. It adds costs, makes EVs less affordable, and shortens their lifespan. This plan denies reality and doubles down on failed green energy policies. It won't work any better this time.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

buy an EV, wind up regulated by the PUC. cannot charge at peak times. now you're going to need to include "car to grid" capability as backup power for ruinous generation policies. https://t.co/Locse73FcC

@boriquagato - el gato malo

as ever, the decision makers are reality deniers and have no idea what they key salients mean. leaving aside that this is near impossible to manage, it also adds costs: $1000's per hookup and huge modifications to the grid. this will make EV's even less affordable. https://t.co/uSWMakY1fF

@boriquagato - el gato malo

it will also make them shorter lives and less reliable. you only get so many charge/discharge cycles on a battery. using it as grid backup will shorten the driving life of a car, perhaps quite a lot. then what? the owner is out quite a lot of cash.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

this whole plan is absurd. it's just a doubling down of convoluted physics denial to try to prop up the failing (and flailing) green energy grift that is killing california as it foregrounds the infeasible and denies the effective it's not going to work any better this time... https://t.co/hIS1QhnVZm

Saved - September 5, 2023 at 4:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark didn't enforce strict lockdowns in 2020. Google mobility data shows their normalcy. Lockdowns failed to stop COVID, resulting in higher all-cause deaths. Curves remained unaffected by drops in mobility. The lockdown response caused harm without gain. Public health experts admit it, but others may not.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

but sWeDen LOckED dOwN!! no. sweden was pretty normal in 2020. this is the google mobility data from phones. the real lie is that norway, finland, denmark locked down either. mostly, they didn't here's sweden and denmark. can you even tell the difference without labels? https://t.co/r9VnIC7iAJ

@boriquagato - el gato malo

overall winner scandanavia had drop ~20% for maybe 4 weeks then normal mobility vs ~75% in spain and 55% in UK and long periods of suppression lockdowns did not work to stop covid. at all. and they are assoc with higher all cause deaths. https://t.co/kXHNXVICll

@boriquagato - el gato malo

the clearest case here emerges from the total failure of lockdowns to bend covid curves. if they stopped spread, they'd affect the case and death count. but they don't. the curves are perfect gompertz with zero effect from drops in mobility (5/20) https://t.co/EUzzVNL3ts

@boriquagato - el gato malo

this was known and knowable. https://t.co/sFdUYqxO80

@boriquagato - el gato malo

the whole lockdown response was panic driven farce and accomplished max harm for zero gain. it bought nothing. and the honest public health folks have long admitted it. i wonder is the rest ever will? (lol. j/k. of course they won't...) https://t.co/M2ocAFqbNJ

Saved - September 5, 2023 at 4:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Leo's claim of a physical barrier is baseless. Masks don't work for protection or source control. The Kansas study was fraudulent, cherry-picking data. Masks have no effect in schools. N95 masks don't outperform others. Community masking is superstition, lacking compelling data. Ignoring clinical trials and data is a desperate plea for inferior analysis. Masks are ineffective.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

the level of ignorance in leo's post is astonishing. this claim of "physical barrier" is baseless and anyone can see it. masks do not work as protection or source control. they show no societal impact to mitigate spread of respiratory diseases. https://t.co/TUkLmLDsHm

@boriquagato - el gato malo

this was known and knowable. it's been studied for decades and the evidence is widespread and sound. it does not work on flu, and flu would be easier to mitigate than covid which more aerosol. https://t.co/vE5m6SbKga

@boriquagato - el gato malo

you've made these claims about the kansas study, but they are false. it was a fraudulent study using cherry picked data and timing. the full timeframe tells a different story. https://t.co/4IoFl2pMZ0

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and masks are well known not to work as source control. https://t.co/diSIouT8kA

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and as emily oster's data showed us clearly, they had no effect in schools. https://t.co/FdPsCToi0Z

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and no, N95 does not fix this. they do not outperform other mask types. https://t.co/qOfv82Vr84

@boriquagato - el gato malo

the fact is that community masking to stop a respiratory virus is not science. it's superstition. there is no compelling data for efficacy and reams showing a lack thereof. arrogant argument by assertion will not change that.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and making claims like "my contrived lab test shows X" so ignore the actual clinical, trial, and community data of masks in actual use is just a desperate plea to use inferior analysis made out of inability to provide good data.

Saved - September 1, 2023 at 10:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In early 2020, I initially dismissed the idea of COVID-19 being a bioweapon. However, after seeing a grant application by Daszak, it became clear. The cover-up was facilitated by powerful funders like NIH and DoD. The involvement of those who conducted the research in the investigation panels was a red flag. We must uncover and address the enabling practices to prevent a recurrence. Let's not fall short.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

i agree with this assessment. it took me a while to realize it and in early 2020, i found this to be implausible because if you were going to make a bioweapon, covid would be a lousy base. then i saw daszak's DARPA grant application and realized what probably happened. 🙀

@boriquagato - el gato malo

as to why it was covered up, that seems easy: lots of powerful people funded it. when you have the NIH and DoD funding viral hotwiring in china so they can color outside the lines and they fail to supervise it, it goes way too far, and then escapes, of course they cover it up. https://t.co/CCZb5qt6Sp

@boriquagato - el gato malo

the obvious tell was how many of the people involved in the research wound up on the panels to investigate the outbreak/source. it was pure "fox commission empaneled to study henhouse murders." the pangolins never stood a chance... https://t.co/8mS6lLooay

@boriquagato - el gato malo

getting to the bottom of this and rooting out the people and practices than enable, abetted, and sought to hide this is an important undertaking. fail to do so, and this is going to happen again. let's not come up short. https://t.co/3iGaFpS26Y

Saved - September 1, 2023 at 10:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The modern green movement focuses on performative deprivation and obedience, rather than addressing real issues like water rights and nuclear power. By using social pressure and indoctrination, they instill belief and compel participation. However, their intrusive actions have little measurable impact on the world. The movement's emphasis on useless goals and resistance to effective solutions hinders progress. While there are genuine environmental concerns, this misguided approach obstructs finding real solutions.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

the modern green movement is mostly a luddite evangelical sect seeking to atone for some imagined fall from paradise through self-mortification and faux asceticism they use performative deprivation and obedience to cement belief in place through a process of cognitive dissonance https://t.co/MF70yOndlX

@boriquagato - el gato malo

they fail to address the real issues (like ag paying for water rights or using nuclear power) the point of these petty intrusions is not to change anything. they are rounding errors. the point is to be intrusive, to be annoying. the point is to compel your participation https://t.co/hHnCWoDiVo

@boriquagato - el gato malo

the act of participation serves as indoctrination your mind seeks cognitive harmony and when it asks "why did i do this annoying thing?" it must have an answer. and the answer it gins up is "because this is important!" because the only other answer is "i'm a dope." https://t.co/RUOHEdYc33

@boriquagato - el gato malo

social pressure is used to initiate this and ongoing performance used to cement it in place your kids come home from school braying about plastic straws @ restaurants & legislators ban them this has 0 measurable effect on the world but huge effect on society: it instills belief https://t.co/0dH2ArC0lk

@boriquagato - el gato malo

we can argue if this is planned or an emergent property of people being people, but the outcome is the same: the bigger issues like "hey let's use less packaging" are left unaddressed because they do not trigger this effect. so the whole movement winds up backwards https://t.co/2ESC97yuUc

@boriquagato - el gato malo

the denizens of the people's republic of california are told to shower quickly, let lawns die, & snitch on their neighbors for the antisocial crime of car washing meanwhile, a zillion gallons of water given away for near nothing to let famers grow alfalfa and cotton in a desert. https://t.co/4jbrnVX6qH

@boriquagato - el gato malo

modern greens push visible but useless and unserious goals they champion energy sources that do not work & resist those that do because the point is not to thrive: the point is to weave endless hair-shirts to intensify alliance to the secular religion of watermelondom https://t.co/mr9njYVU2n

@boriquagato - el gato malo

realizing this is half the battle they do not want to fix anything or to see humans flourish they want to see societies fail and are experiencing deprivation as validation this is why they are mostly so miserable as people decline their invitation to join them it's a trap https://t.co/1os9VGcs4Q

@boriquagato - el gato malo

i am not anti-ecology. i like open spaces and clean air and water. there are many real environmental issues in the world. but this nonsense is sucking all the air out of the room and leaving them unaddressed. it's not the solution. it's barrier to finding one. https://t.co/pyeXOxQhMh

Saved - September 1, 2023 at 10:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
UK all-cause deaths by vaccination status reveal no benefit and serious harm across age groups. Boosted individuals face elevated risk, with incomplete data and reporting issues. Blending the risk reveals disappearing benefits. Double dosing further increases risk ratios. Concerning findings.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

another look at UK all cause deaths by vaccination status, this time using their own ASMR data. once you consider the effect of a full series of covid vaxx, no age group sees benefit and many see serious harm. https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/another-look-at-uk-all-cause-mortality

another look at UK all cause mortality by vaxx status using the ASMR data to look at the full vaccine experience boriquagato.substack.com

@boriquagato - el gato malo

to look at this, one might presume that certain age bands see boosted +21 days look better than unvaxxed (50-79 males, 50-89 females) but this is a meaningfully incomplete picture

@boriquagato - el gato malo

because if there is one thing we know for sure, it's that all booster > 21 days ago folks were once boosted for < 21 days. and the data from that period shows it to be a time of severely elevated risk. (many age groups were non-evaluable because of the ONS data reporting std)

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and when we add that risk in on a blended fashion to get the full effect of the booster course, the benefit disappears and then some.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

when we add in the need to have at one time been double dosed as well, we start to see greatly elevated risk ratios.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and that, i fear, is how we wind up here:

@boriquagato - el gato malo

methodology and data sources are linked in the substack. i'd be grateful if you'd read it before asking questions. https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/another-look-at-uk-all-cause-mortality

another look at UK all cause mortality by vaxx status using the ASMR data to look at the full vaccine experience boriquagato.substack.com
Saved - September 1, 2023 at 7:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Raw age-stratified data reveals a concerning 5060% increase in all-cause deaths among the vaccinated in the UK by May 2022. This mortality trend persisted across all age groups. However, vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 deaths declined, likely due to evolving variants. The divergence between all-cause and COVID-19 deaths raises questions about miscounting or other mortality factors. The refusal to release crucial raw data hinders a proper cost-benefit assessment. Who is public health truly protecting? Read the substack for more insights. #PublicHealthConcerns

@boriquagato - el gato malo

i found what i believe to be the best set of raw, age stratified all cause deaths data by vaccination status it shows that "ever vaxxed" was associated w/ 50-60% overall increase in all cause deaths in the UK by may 2022 this is a deeply worrying result https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/uk-age-stratified-all-cause-death

UK age stratified all cause death data shows higher deaths associated with covid vaccination at this point, this looks like about as clear a signal as one could find. release the rest of this data. boriquagato.substack.com

@boriquagato - el gato malo

higher all cause mortality was seen in all age groups and this relative risk rate was still rising in may when this series appears to have been discontinued. https://t.co/Yuzb2ncCH2

@boriquagato - el gato malo

based on this same data, VE vs covid death was rapidly declining (likely due to vaccine driven evolution to escape variants) but remained positive in may https://t.co/Ft38L23LPF

@boriquagato - el gato malo

this divergence from all cause deaths implies that either "covid deaths" are being miscounted/misattributed or that covid mortality benefit is being swamped by other forms of mortality. https://t.co/DyehOrjHH6

@boriquagato - el gato malo

because someone is sure to not read the piece and bring this up: https://t.co/k5kO1tyzqP

@boriquagato - el gato malo

continued promotion despite this negative mortality result & refusal to release raw data that clearly exists & is vital for real cost/benefit assessment leads to a pointy question: just who is “public health” protecting here? because it certainly does not seem like “the public” https://t.co/pBtbVNv04m

@boriquagato - el gato malo

i know people are going to want to jump in with ideas and criticisms and opinions and that's what twitter is for. all i ask is: please do actually read the substack first. it may answer/address your point.

Saved - September 1, 2023 at 7:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Global health policies in 2020 focused on nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) like distancing, masks, and school closures. However, data shows no correlation between NPIs and total deaths. Lockdowns were panic responses that came too late and had little overall effect. Longstanding pandemic guidelines actually advised against them. Similarly, there is no evidence that reopening had any significant impact. The lack of material causality and overwhelming data suggest that NPIs and community masking do not work effectively. Asymptomatic spread is rare, and regional factors play a bigger role in infection rates. The moralizing and censorship surrounding these policies mask the truth. It's time to reject these ineffective measures and their devastating consequences.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

global health policy in 2020 has centered around NPI's (non-pharmaceutical interventions) like distancing, masks, school closures these have been sold as a way to stop infection as though this were science. this was never true and that fact was known and knowable. let's look.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

above is the plot of social restriction and NPI vs total death per million. there is 0 R2. this means that the variables play no role in explaining one another. we can see this same relationship between NPI and all cause deaths. this is devastating to the case for NPI.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

clearly, correlation is not proof of causality, but a total lack of correlation IS proof that there was no material causality. barring massive and implausible coincidence, it's essentially impossible to cause something and not correlate to it, especially 51 times.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

this would seem to pose some very serious questions for those claiming that lockdowns work, those basing policy upon them, and those claiming this is the side of science. there is no science here nor any data. this is the febrile imaginings of discredited modelers.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

this has been clear and obvious from all over the world since the beginning and had been proven so clearly by may that it's hard to imagine anyone who is actually conversant with the data still believing in these responses. everyone got the same R curve

@boriquagato - el gato malo

lockdowns were a panic response. they came LONG after disease growth curves had rolled over and had no effect overall. it's clear when you plot google mobility data vs disease curves. (this is from may)

@boriquagato - el gato malo

r2 was ~0. this was all proven by may and strongly argued by april. this data is literally overwhelming. there is just no evidence that lockdowns work.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

spain and netherlands had radically different responses

@boriquagato - el gato malo

but got R curves that were all but indistinguishable. this issue crops up everywhere. mitigation has zero effect.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

similarly, there is no evidence that opening again had any effect either.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and this was all known. every set of longstanding pandemic guidelines contra-indicated lockdowns.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

it's 50 year old pseudoscience and the clarity with which NPI was dismissed by everyone until this year when we suddenly abandoned 100 years of science and started making stuff up and moralizing about it as though it were canon is stunning.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

the same is true of masks. just last year the WHO surveyed this and found that community masking does not work. nothing has changed.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

the "studies" trotted out this year are so awful as to beggar belief. they are either nonsensical lab bench presumption devoid of clinical or social outcome, or they are contrived cherry picks lacking controls. the CDC used this one. it's risible.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

CDC and gottlieb later pushed this study which is outright fraud.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and you can see piles of data from the swiss policy research institute here: https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/

Are Face Masks Effective? The Evidence. An overview of the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of face masks. swprs.org

@boriquagato - el gato malo

there is no sound evidence that community masking has any effect. the evidence they work as "source control" is entirely speculative and made up. the fact that they increase, not decrease post op infection in surgical theaters is pretty damning.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and now that it's becoming clear that asymptotic spread is vanishingly rare, we can really put the final nail in the NPI coffin. this is the vector these interventions mean to head off. but it was never a serious source of infection.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

the simple fact is this: nothing we have done has made any meaningful difference covid is seasonal and regional. when your season comes, it comes NPI is not why california and peru and eastern europe did not get hit in the spring it was just regional

@boriquagato - el gato malo

then your season comes and everyone moves together. we've been mistaking baby oil for suncreeen in places where it was still night time. then, noon came and it was revealed for what it really was.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

this means that all this moralizing about "you just want grandma to die" and the censorship of evidence counter to this "big lie" that lockdowns work has been at best a disastrous mistake and at worst, a cynical ploy to wreak havoc and cover past errors.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

politicians are now doubling and trebling down on lockdowns and masks because to do otherwise is to admit that they bought us $10 trillion of sugar water as medicine and wrecked our lives and livelihoods for no sound reason. they will never do that.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

this is why they have shifted the debate to morality and censorship: to mask the fact that the science and the data calls them liars. repeat "i'm on the side of science" enough and scare people endlessly and you can generate social belief. but it's pure propaganda.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

these mitigations do not work to stop covid or to reduce overall deaths. this is the most expensive peace time policy debacle in human history and they all want to do it again. say no. stand up. this is not medicine, it's poison. this does not save lives, it wrecks them.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

it's easy to sell false hope to scared people. there are whole industries that prey on the desperation of parents with sick kids. but sometimes, there is just not much you can do however much you want control and want to "do something". this is one of those times.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and we need to accept that. many times, the best way to "do something" is to do nothing. "something" in this case has been a absolute disaster. we panicked into unprecedented global self-harm. it's time to stop. this is just making it worse stay brave. stay free. stay safe.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

apparently, the link i used for the asymptomatic spread study is down (crashed from so much traffic). this is the article it cites.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

also: this is the methodology for policy stringency. we can obviously debate weighting and values, but i checked it against the google mobility data i have used and it lined up quite well. the output looks reasonable to me. https://wallethub.com/edu/states-coronavirus-restrictions/73818

States with the Fewest Coronavirus Restrictions wallethub.com
Saved - September 1, 2023 at 7:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A study by the Royal Society is criticized as garbage, cherry-picking data and spreading lies. Lockdowns and masks are deemed ineffective, with no impact on disease curves. The volume of poorly done science fails to substitute rigor. The motives behind pushing ineffective measures are questioned, highlighting the love for crisis and fear-mongering by experts. Compliance won't lead to freedom; it's a trap. It's time to put an end to this manipulation and take control.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

this new royal society study is pure garbage. it's just "papering the file" for some forthcoming pseudoscientific outrage. the evidence that masks and lockdowns failed is overwhelming. this study is a collection of datacrime, cherry picking, and lies.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

this data has been hilariously obvious right from the beginning. not only did all the pandemic guidelines say none of this would work, but the data bore it out immediately and conclusively. no curves were bent. lockdowns made zero difference, zero. https://t.co/EUzzVNLBj0

@boriquagato - el gato malo

it's obvious in every real, data driven comparison huge differences in lockdown https://t.co/drxx2R9GrA

@boriquagato - el gato malo

had ZERO effect on disease curves. https://t.co/s98jTRiZsS

@boriquagato - el gato malo

this new royal society bunk festival is just pure garbage. the data is junk and the conclusions are worse. it's a compendium of badly done science trying to substitute volume for rigor. this was all glaringly obvious 2 years ago. https://t.co/YVyNTtkYSp

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and there is nothing ambiguous about it. https://t.co/lR5ZF6RgXa

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and they full on KNEW it was not going to work even when they were doing it. https://t.co/1uuL4F7Hp2

@boriquagato - el gato malo

an aerosol virion the size of covid takes 2-4 weeks to fall 5 feet to the ground in still air. contact tracing is useless. you're walking around in weeks worth of virus everywhere you go. it's a fake tool pushed by fools or those who just want to track you. https://t.co/14dmD0cWqJ

@boriquagato - el gato malo

masks don't work, were known not to work, and the endless ethical inversion of "your mask protects me" was entirely fake and baseless. it was psyop, not science. masks do not even stop infections in surgical theaters. but sure, it works on your toddler... https://t.co/PW6NRCHwKu

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and amusingly, the royal society itself sure seemed like they used to know this. i wonder what changed "the science™" https://t.co/PrBLSxE7xk

@boriquagato - el gato malo

surely it could not be something as prosaic as "the money™" or "the power™" these are people of principle, right? (meme from 2020. wonderfully evergreen) https://t.co/gREOBjp3Kj

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and no, "you just need an n95" is not a thing either. https://t.co/2rjMo0hWdt

@boriquagato - el gato malo

these people have been caught lying so many times that there is simply no basis for even listening to, much less believing them. it's all been lies and manipulation and datacrime to push fake fixes upon an unsuspecting public. https://t.co/lAtETo6njd

@boriquagato - el gato malo

and obviously, two can play at "fake correlations" https://t.co/xtB8qlVBpy

@boriquagato - el gato malo

but this is a silly game. the real game is far more insidious: all these "experts" love crisis and fear mongering because that is what makes the money roll in. the song and dance of fear and fake mitigation is a money printer. https://t.co/ln1HjufCw8

@boriquagato - el gato malo

it's starting again because they want their gravy train back and the statists who seek control find it a convenient pretext. this is a nasty confluence that does not have your interests at heart. there is no "out" or "done." you cannot comply your way to freedom. https://t.co/44cvxuc0pO

@boriquagato - el gato malo

this is not intended to stop. it's intended to habituate you and mire you in endless sunk cost fallacy by feeding you to the most hopelessly anxious and agoraphobic 10% of the population and the erection of a sort of "neurocracy" of rule by the worst calibrated. it's a trap. https://t.co/iWS5PrSfWe

@boriquagato - el gato malo

it will not stop until we make it stop. and it's time we did. https://t.co/JFEqkB04na

Saved - August 17, 2023 at 3:50 AM

@boriquagato - el gato malo

the greatest risk that AI poses to humans is not that it will lie to us, it's the reaction humans are going to have to learning just how extensively we have been lied to by other humans. "the narrative class" cannot withstand this. and they are not going to go quietly.

Saved - May 20, 2023 at 3:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Aggressive use of ventilators during the pandemic caused iatrogenic deaths, with ICU survival rates 4X higher in places that did not use them. This strategy was ill-advised and medicine knew better. It was not solely about protecting patients, but also about protecting doctors from spreading the virus. Revisionist history should not obscure these facts.

@boriquagato - el gato malo

how odd then that in the places that did so most aggressively, people died in absolute droves from it while in the places that did not do it, ICU survival rates were 4X higher. i'm sure one can point to a few cases where it was needed, but mostly, it caused iatrogenic death. https://t.co/n0qD2LcbMT

@Craig_A_Spencer - Craig Spencer MD MPH

You know why we intubated people for Covid in March 2020? Because otherwise they were going to die. Full. Stop. I remember a patient rolling in with an oxygen saturation of 42%, breathing twice as fast as normal,struggling on a face mask with oxygen all the way up. What to do?

@boriquagato - el gato malo

this was already obvious in april of 2020 and should have been so beforehand. outside of a few high risk cases, "vent early, vent hard" was an ill advised strategy that killed people wholesale. and medicine knew better. https://t.co/UVU9cmKsF7

@boriquagato - el gato malo

much of this was not even about protecting patients. it was about protecting doctors by keeping patients from spreading virus. amazing the revisionist history here.

View Full Interactive Feed