TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @calvinrobinson
reSee.it AI Summary
The Talmud expresses a clear hostility toward Jesus Christ, contrasting with Islam, which is seen as a Christian heresy. For more insights, you can catch the full interview with @rightresponsem exclusively on Lotus Eaters.
@calvinrobinson - Fr Calvin Robinson
“The Talmud is uniquely hostile toward Jesus Christ. Islam may play off Christianity - it is a Christian heresy - but Talmudic Judaism is explicitly anti-Christian.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The New Testament fulfills the Old Testament by applying its laws to our lives, emphasizing that Jesus calls us to live through Him rather than legalistically. The law remains immutable, and while grace does not replace it, it empowers us to obey out of gratitude for salvation. Historically, Judaism has reacted to Jesus, often rejecting Him, which sets it apart from other religions that may acknowledge Him in some capacity. The Talmud, as a central text of Judaism, is notably hostile towards Jesus, unlike other religions that may offer a more respectful view. Even secular Jews in modern Israel are influenced by this cultural backdrop, which may lead to a general inclination against Christianity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it does I suppose that's what it means when we say that the the New Testament fulfills the Old Testament and it doesn't replace it. It's not a new set of laws. It's taking the laws which were always good and showing us how to apply them to our lives. That's what Jesus does. He says stop living legalistically and live through me, and this is how you enter heaven.
It's it's all quite simple really, isn't it? Why why is it so complicated to people these days?
Speaker 1: Because of Judaism. No. I'm just kidding. I'm just kidding. I I I think, you know, evangelicals have, we just we drank the Kool Aid.
We bought into a lot of a lot of lies. And and there's reasons for that, and and it's hard to get to some of those reasons without speculation. It's hard to definitively prove some of those things. But we really one of the the the chief mistakes that I think was made theologically over the last 80 years or so is we pitted grace against law, gospel against, you know, New Testament against Old Testament. In in some sense, we even have this perceived division of the trinity itself that, you know, the son is somehow against his father, you know, and and and the law is against grace and gospel against, old testament and all these things.
But but the reality is that, the law of God is immutable. There are certain civil codes that, were direct, application for Israel under the old covenant in the old testament. But even our confessions within the reform tradition says that the general equity of the civil code is still applicable today. It's not a one to one ratio. You don't just drop wholesale, civil codes in Israel, you know, in these United States or in Great Britain, you know, or France.
But what you do is you take, you know, a parapet around the roof, you know, the preservation of human life made in the image of God, and and you extract the general principle there, you go back to the decalogue, which is summary law, and and you go to the 6th commandment, thou shalt not murder, and stated in the positive sense, thou shalt preserve the protection and dignity of human life, and you get speed limits or seat belts or so so my point is to say that all the law of God is immutable. It doesn't it was not replaced. Jesus even said, I tell you the truth, unless heaven until heaven or earth, and earth pass away, not one jot or tittle, not one dotted I or cross t will pass away. All the law continues to stand. Jesus came not to abolish the law or but to fulfill the law.
And what the gospel does for us is it doesn't replace law with grace. But what the gospel and grace does for us is it's the wind in our sails that gives us the motivation and the power and the ability to live in obedience to the law of god knowing that that we're no longer obeying god's law as a means of salvation, but we're rather obeying God's law as a response of gratitude for the free salvation we've already received by grace. But the law still stands still stands.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. I would say that's this is why we receive the grace because we receive the law and we were incapable on our own of following it. And so through his grace, we are able to follow his law, and that's the whole purpose of it.
Speaker 1: Amen. Well, if we could, Calvin, real real quick, I was thinking, one other thing that I think it's so important for Christians to realize that our promise is not unhinged, and I think you agree with it because I've seen some of your posts, and I think you're, you're poking some really strategic good hopes. So one thing that I wanted to say about Judaism, and, so apart from earthly temporal effects, I think it's important historically, you know, this wasn't always the case, but there are many examples of this. One of the things that would happen, especially with the reformers, is that, Jews would come into whether it be England or France or or America, they would come in and and they would be provided, quarter. And and good Christian nations would say, we we it's not right to oppress the sojourner and and so we're gonna treat them fairly, and we're gonna treat them with dignity and respect and kindness.
But then these Christian nations with Christian ministers, inevitably, because God is exceedingly kind to all peoples, of all ethnicities, what would happen, inevitably, some of the Jews would come to faith in Jesus. They would convert to Christianity. They would join the ranks of the Christian churches, not necessarily as ministers, but they would be welcomed into membership in these things, and and then they would develop friendships with these Christian ministers. And then the reformers especially, they eventually because they were they were coming out of the Vulgate, the Latin Vulgate and Catholicism these things and wanting to, you know, think of William Tyndale or Luther and translate the Bible. And so they they would go to these converted Jews and say, would you help us with the original manuscripts and the Hebrew and as we seek to understand the Old Testament properly.
And and so these converted Jews would would help them to that, to that end and teach them how to read the Hebrew, write in Hebrew, and understand it. And and then some of these converted Jews, now Christians, said, oh, and by the way, you should probably be aware of, what's in the Talmud. You haven't been able to read it and now you can. You should probably read a copy. And some of these Christian ministers would read the Talmud and then they would say, what the heck?
And and all of a sudden a little bit of of the kindness and respect that was shown by these Christian nations to Jews would be revoked. And they wouldn't necessarily be mean, but they would say, I don't know if you can be here and practice Judaism. And my point in saying this is Islam will send you to hell. Buddhism will send you to hell. Mhmm.
Hinduism will send you to hell. But it's worth noting that those three religions, major world false religions, they all deny the deity of Christ and salvation in him alone, and therefore, they'll send you to hell. But they all carve out some kind of respectable position for Jesus. He's an esteemed prophet or a good teacher or a miracle worker or something. Judaism is unique.
The Talmud is unique in the sense that it's the only major world religion that is undeniably hostile towards the person and work of Jesus Christ. It it does not carve out a space for him as, well, he's not deity. He's not the son of god, but he is still an esteemed prophet. He had many good things to say. Now Judaism, its its ultimate foundation is a hatred.
We have to be able to say that. Yeah. That doesn't mean all Jews, but Judaism as an ideology and a religion is a unique, fundamentally, hatred of Jesus.
Speaker 0: I suppose it's because Talmudic Judaism is a reaction to Jesus, isn't it? It's a rejection and a reaction. I did a search on I asked Google, what does the Talmud teach about Jesus? And Google AI said, there's no overview for this. And then, okay, alarm bells started ringing.
I asked Grok and Grok said, in Sanhedrin 107b, describes Jesus as an idolaterer. Rabbi Joshua Ben and Parakhia says through his narrative of what am I saying here? Speaks of a post mortem of punishment for Jesus placed in boiling excrement, which some interpret as a polemic against Christian theology. And I've been told to look up what the Talmud teaches about Jesus' mother too, the mother of God, which well, I will be looking up later. But the Talmud does not seem to be a Christian friendly or Christian, aligned document at all or or
Speaker 1: No. I mean and that's and that's the thing that you you have to recognize about Islam is Islam is a a Christian heresy. So you it's it's very clear, you know, when it was written, it didn't fall out of the sky. You know? You know, Mohammed, certainly, wrote, I think, much of of, the Quran, and and then, you know, I think others played a part, but he he certainly had, his his, you know, hand in all of this.
And and so certain popular Christian heresies at the time in the 7 100 worked their way into the Quran. For instance, like the, the folklore of, Jesus from the womb, you know, when Mary and Joseph are fleeing to Egypt to escape Herod, you know, and his tyranny. And Mary is still pregnant, so Jesus is in utero in the womb. And Mary is weary, you know, and they're traveling through the desert and Jesus from the womb speaks to a tree so that it would bend over, so that, so that they would be able to get fruit, you know. And or in another instance when after he's born, he's still an infant, he's nursing and, and he, you know, turns his head from the breast of of his mother Mary and preaches a sermon, you know, to people.
Basically, defends Mary because people were saying that, you know, he was born out of wedlock and calling her an adulterer, and he defends his mother, you know, as a 6 month old child. These kinds of things you can find in Islamic teaching and in the Quran. But my point is this. In both of those instances, although I I believe they're false and not true stories, what what Islam was doing even in its in its origin, in the writing of its sacred text, was playing off of Christianity. It was, it it was providing a a a alternative.
It's certainly not Christian, but it but it was working off of Christian capital. It was, it it was it's a Christian, distortion, a heresy. Judaism is different. It it's it it's not, playing off of Christian capital. It, it's going for the jugular.
It's going directly up Christianity and trying to, trying to to take it down, trying to destroy it. And and that is a difference. And so my position, you know, is to play the devil's advocate. You know? I I have people sometimes tell me, well, Joel, but if we're thinking about Jews today, alright, or, like, how is this relevant?
How does it apply? Let's get practical. If we think about the modern state of Israel today and we think about, you know, modern Jews today, well, Israel, for the most part, is is not Talmudic Judaism, Joel. It's it's a secular state. You know?
It may only be 20% of Israel today that actually practices religion religiously, Talmud, Judaism, the rest are just secular, you know, much like a lot of people in America are secular. And this is what I would say though. I think of Richard Dawkins who recently, said it was so funny to hear. You know, guys who have devoted their entire lives to destroying Christianity and then all of a sudden see the fruit of what they've labored for and say, oh, wait. I didn't mean it.
You know? Like, turns out and and and so what he said, the big line that everybody, you know, all the Christians, we couldn't help but chuckle, It was when he says, well, but I I did you know, I'm not a Christian. Yeah. I hate Jesus. But I like to think of myself as a cultural Christian.
Right? He he because he knows what cultural Islam looks like. He's like, that that doesn't sound good. I I benefit from the freedoms and the liberties and the blessings of of being, you know, a cultural Christian. And I don't wanna see that go away.
I prefer church bells, you know, and Christmas to, prayer sirens 5 times a day, you know, and Be
Speaker 0: a dog.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly. And so he's saying these things. And so here's my point. Even Richard Dawkins, a known atheist, recognizes that, that there is such a thing as even though there may only be let's say there's only 40 or 30% of America's actually practicing Christians or or regenerate Christians in the true spiritual sense.
And yet all Americans, whether they like it or not, whether they're even conscious of it or not, are swimming in a Christian milieu. There there is a broader Christian culture. The same is true of Israel. So there may only be 20 practicing 20% practicing, Talmudic, Jews. But but I would say that Israel as a nation has been shaped even for those who don't practice, in the sense of cultural Judaism.
And so if the religious central text of cultural Judaism is the Talmud, and if that religious text, more than the Quran, more than certain sacred texts with Buddhism or Hinduism or any other major world religion, if it is uniquely hostile towards Jesus and its fundamental rejection and hatred of him, even for those who don't practice the religion, with a nation and a people who have been shaped culturally by that religion, would there be, even unknowingly perhaps, would there be certain inclinations that would not be favorable towards cristadon, towards Christian Western nations? I think that's a very reasonable possibility.
Speaker 0: Thank you for watching my Common Sense Crusade. If you'd like to watch the whole show, you can subscribe to lotus eaters.com for as little as £5 per month, and then you get access to a bank of content as well. My show is 3 PM every Thursday. See you there. Day as follows.
@calvinrobinson - Fr Calvin Robinson
You can watch the full interview with @rightresponsem exclusively on Lotus Eaters: https://lotuseaters.com/common-sense-crusade-or-05-12-2024
Common Sense Crusade | 05/12/2024 | Lotus Eaters
Fr Calvin Robinson sits down with Joel Webbon to understand the Christian view on "Judeo-Christianity". Are Christianity and Judaism compatible or contradictory faiths?Reading List
lotuseaters.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I express concern over the recent curriculum changes aimed at teaching children to identify "extremist content" and "fake news," which I believe could lead to indoctrination. Many on the Right share my outrage, fearing that schools will promote anti-parent sentiments and label truths as conspiracy theories. I argue that children belong to their parents, not the state, and that home education is a better option to instill good values. With a significant number of educators leaning Left, I question why we trust the education system with our children's future, given my extensive experience in it.
@calvinrobinson - Fr Calvin Robinson
Children will be taught how to spot “extremist content” and “fake news” online in a revamp of the curriculum following last week’s riots. Schools to arm pupils against “putrid conspiracy theories”, the Education Secretary has said. They openly plan to indoctrinate the children. https://t.co/X82Gl7kpnY
@calvinrobinson - Fr Calvin Robinson
People on the Right are outraged that the Left intends to indoctrinate their children. Schools will teach children to hate their parents, labelling them “far right” The truth will be labelled as “putrid conspiracy theories” What do you expect? The Left will do as the Left does
@calvinrobinson - Fr Calvin Robinson
Children are the responsibility of parents, not the state. It is time for conservatives to stop palming children off to the state, only for them to be indoctrinated against British values. Teach your children yourself. Pass on good values. Join home education hubs. Works in 🇺🇸
@calvinrobinson - Fr Calvin Robinson
70-80% of teachers and academics are Left-leaning. Pair that with this new socialist government. It is not in your best interests to send your children to the indoctrination camps known as state schools. It is harmful to your child and to society. If your child does not end up hating you and your country, they may end up being “socially transitioned” without your knowledge. Why would you risk your child’s mental wellbeing? The common excuse is, it is too expensive to home educate. Well, it is too expensive not to!
@calvinrobinson - Fr Calvin Robinson
I have been a teacher, assistant principal, education consultant. I helped start a school, and was director/governor of schools. I have seen first hand how rotten our education system is. Why are we trusting them with our “most valuable resource and best hope for the future”?!
@calvinrobinson - Dcn Calvin Robinson
Isabel Vaughan-Spruce has been given a fixed penalty notice by the Thought Police. Clearly not protesting. Clearly not harassing anyone. Clearly causing no harm. Arrested for silently praying in her head, again! https://t.co/sjV4QkqOXO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about their presence at an abortion center. Speaker 1 clarifies that they are not part of an organized protest or affiliated with any pro-life or pro-choice organization. Speaker 1 also states that they are not protesting or praying for unborn children, but rather praying at the location. Speaker 0 informs Speaker 1 about a public protection order in place and accuses them of breaching it. Speaker 1 denies breaching the order and refuses to move outside the exclusion zone, asserting their right to be there. Speaker 0 explains that a fixed penalty notice will be issued for failure to comply with the order. Speaker 1 reiterates that they are not protesting, just praying.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you here as part of an organised protest? No. You're not. Are you part of a pro life organisation or pro choice organisation?
Speaker 1: I am, but I'm not here in that
Speaker 0: capacity. Okay. Are you protesting? No. Are you here to pray for the lives of your unborn children?
That it's
Speaker 1: a little bit leading, but no. I'm not.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: Prayer? I can pray elsewhere, but I I want to pray here today.
Speaker 0: Right. Why have you chosen the location here stand?
Speaker 1: You know this is an abortion centre that I'm standing outside of. Mhmm. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Okay. Are you aware that there is a public case protection order in place here?
Speaker 1: Yes. I am.
Speaker 0: Okay. Are you aware that you're breaching a public protection order? I'm not. No. Will you move from here to outside the exclusion zone?
Speaker 1: I I don't believe I need to.
Speaker 0: Okay. If not, why are you not willing to move outside of the exclusion zone?
Speaker 1: Because I don't believe I need to. I believe I've got a right to be here.
Speaker 0: Okay. Right. If you believe that you're present to press in any form, obviously we're going to need to issue with a fixed penalty note.
Speaker 1: Can you explain that again?
Speaker 0: Yes, we've if you believe that you're present to protect in any form
Speaker 1: If I'm if I believe what? Sorry.
Speaker 0: If you believe that you are present to protest in any
Speaker 1: I'm not here to protest. No.
Speaker 0: Right. Well, you're in the PSPO. You you you're breaching it.
Speaker 1: I'm in the zone Yes. But I'm not protesting.
Speaker 0: Yes. So you're gonna be giving the fleets penalty notice today. Okay? And that will be given to you with the offence and failure to cope with the public space protection order under the Antisocial Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014. And my colleague's gonna yet.
Just to make
Speaker 1: it clear, I'm not protesting.
Speaker 0: Okay. But you know you can't do here. I'll just point out the PSPO from there. I think you've seen that before.
Speaker 1: I know there's a zone here, but I'm not protesting within the zone. I'm just finally praying.
@calvinrobinson - Dcn Calvin Robinson
And we have a winner for the most racist thing I’ve seen so far today!
@BameFor - African, Caribbean and Asian Lawyers For Justice
And we have a winner! There was plenty of stiff competition, but we are delighted the award goes to a black man who went over and above the call of duty in service to white supremacy. #NWA
@calvinrobinson - Dcn Calvin Robinson
Where’s the lie?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Russell Brand's past struggles with sex addiction are well-documented, and he has never tried to hide them. The idea that he is being targeted now because of his views on COVID and big pharma is being questioned. The establishment seems to be seeking revenge and has regurgitated old accusations against him. Despite this, Brand continues to thrive with a successful media platform and a sold-out tour. It is important for him to remember that as long as he knows who he is and tries to do right by others, he will prevail. People who support him should continue to do so, as it is unfair to be attacked solely for having different opinions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it is early and I can barely see through my own eyes, but I thought it was important to state a few things about Russell Brand. Number 1, Russell Brand always said he had sex addiction. He's written about it. He's documented it. It's something that was in his past.
And he may have had more sex with more people than others, almost, but he was never trying to hide to all of that. I'm sure many of the finger pointing good and great wouldn't like all of their past Doug, up and put on camera either. Second, if you want to make a documentary with shocking evidence about someone you're trying to take down and you tell people They can sit in the shadows and not have to show their faces. Well, you know, many people would be prepared do that because if you can't see the person, it's also hard to see their truth, isn't it? And you'll notice that the left, the Guardian, The Olympic Committee, everybody, they loved Russell.
I remember when Russell broke into my LBC radio studios to call me a Nazi. The left loved Russell at that time, and they couldn't promote him More heavily, they thought he was absolutely fantastic. It's not until he started splitting facts on COVID that they decided he had to be got rid of, particularly after he appeared on American TV screens, talking truth about big pharma and the billionaires that have been created with your tax revenue. And now, they're coming out and saying that he reverse engineered his move over to the freedom movement. He reverse engineered speaking out for people who disagreed with lockdowns, who see what's coming, who know that they're trying to take control away from the people.
They're saying he reverse engineered this in order to try and build up a cultist following so that when all of this came out, he would have cover. I mean, if you're playing a game of Top tenuous, that's about as tenuous as it gets. And the truth, because mainstream isn't that clever, The Guardian Aren't that clever? Is that Channel 4 heavily promoted brand all the time that they wanted to? Now, The establishment has been looking for revenge, revenge for Hugh Edwards.
They've wanted someone from Our side, the side that simply wants everyone to be okay to pick off. And so they just regurgitated old shit about Russell. They found some people willing to sit in the dark and say stuff that pretty much Russell had already fessed up to already. And now that he's a clean living guy, certainly cleaner living than I am, with a happy and stable life and a sold out tour and a successful media platform still, he has to be culled. And if there's one thing I do know about, it's being completely eviscerated from the face of the planet that happened to me many moons ago.
But perhaps, just perhaps, we've been around long enough now for other people to see what's being done. You don't have to support Russell. You don't have to love Russell. You don't have to say that there maybe haven't been a few issues in the past like they have in all of our lives, but please see what's being done to him. They want to eviscerate him from the planet, and I know it personally.
They will keep coming until he swings from a tree. And as a father to 2 children and 1 unborn as yet, I think it's very important that Russell understands that every day he prevails, every day he persists, is the day that he wins and actually, it doesn't matter what people say you are, even Russell calling me a Nazi. It doesn't matter. The only thing that matters, Russell, actually, is that you know who you are and as long as you know that you're a good person and you've tried to do the right thing by most people, then everything will be okay. So to Russell Brand from me, keep going.
And to everybody else out there who's willing to see that you shouldn't be eviscerated purely because of your opinions, Thank you very much for helping support someone and keeping them going. Okay.
@calvinrobinson - Calvin Robinson
Diversity, inclusion and equality (DIE) has become a term for replacing white people with non-white people. Intersectionality means white people - and men in particular - are being actively targeted. Critical Race Theory has made it acceptable to be racist towards white people.