reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @canncon

canncon
Posted - March 9, 2026 at 11:49 AM
Saved - March 10, 2026 at 6:14 AM

@canncon - CannCon

Over two dozen states (29), now including “blood red” states, are being sued to hand over their election data for a first ever federal audit of the voter rolls. This is following the SSA database found to have over 440M users, despite an alleged population of 330M. The justification for the states’ refusal is hilarious: the data exceeds federal authority, violates state privacy laws, and risks misuse of sensitive data. But many of the same states have been sending that data to “researchers” for years. Including CEIR. CEIR received almost $ 70M in “Zuckerbucks” during 2020. That money was disproportionately allocated to MI, PA, GA, AZ, and NY, 4 out of 5 being swing states. CEIR was founded by David Becker. ERIC was founded by David Becker. But it was totally for “research”. Despite CEIR funds being allocated and used to gain access to the voter rolls in real-time to send out text messages to voters who hadn’t yet voted to remind them to vote in at least Michigan in 2020. Here is ERIC’s current president testifying to the GA legislature a few months back:

Video Transcript AI Summary
Eric data involvement amounts to five or six times. The organizations involved include the Research Triangle Institute out of North Carolina, a couple of professors at a couple different universities on the East and West Coast, and in 2020 the Centre for Election Innovation and Reform (CEIR) partnered with some ERIC states to evaluate the effectiveness of their eligible but unregistered mailing. There is no affiliation with ERIC or any of your partners with those organizations; no foreign affiliation. For the record, the executive director of CEIR, Center for Election Innovation Research, was a non-voting board member on ERIC until 2023. The board eliminated those positions in 2023, and he was not reappointed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In terms of ERIC data, I think we're looking at five or six times. Okay, do you remember who those organisations are? Most of them, yes. Research Triangle Institute out of North Carolina, a couple of professors at a couple different universities on the East And West Coast. And then of course, think you know, in 2020, the Centre for Election Innovation and Reform partnered with some ERIC states to evaluate the effectiveness of their eligible but unregistered mailing. Okay. Is there any affiliation with ERIC or any of your partners with any of those organizations? No, foreign affiliation. And just for the record to clarify here too, so because I think you are aware, the executive director of CEIR, Center for Election Innovation Research, was a non voting board member on ERIC until 2023. The board eliminated those positions in 2023, and he was not reappointed. Gotcha. Okay.

@mrosazza - Denver Fail

The insanity of the Colorado voting system is playing out in real-time in U.S. v. Griswold. Since 2012 Colorado sends all of your Election Data to a third party Soros funded NGO named ERIC for supposed voter verification. Colorado uses ERIC religiously to update voter rolls. The DOJ has requested the EXACT same data that Colorado sends to the third party vendor ERIC. Colorado hasn’t turned over the raw data; Jena Griswold publicly said she told them to “take a hike” and won’t help “undermine elections.” So Jena Griswold can turn over YOUR sensitive information to a Soros funded NGO, but not the actual Federal Government whose Constitutional Duty is to confirm election integrity? If Harmeet Dhillon and the DOJ do not win this lawsuit, the Republic of Colorado is over. It is currently an oligarchy with no real elections. Elections are a controlled theatrical production with the outcome decided by George Soros and Jena Griswold. #copolitics @CivilRights @HarmeetKDhillon

CannConActual
Posted - January 23, 2025 at 1:35 PM
Saved - January 24, 2025 at 5:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
This morning, Master Sergeant Jeremy Brown was moved at 5:15 AM, likely to the Philadelphia FDC, according to his attorney, C. Stewart. There are serious concerns for his safety, with Stewart suggesting that Jeremy could be in danger in what he describes as a "gang and tribe run" environment. I will discuss these alarming issues on @SeanParnellUSA's podcast today at 5:15 PM, using insights from my previous interview with Jeremy. I urge @POTUS and others to intervene, as the situation has escalated beyond just a January 6 conviction.

@CannConActual - CannCon

All Eyes: This thread is from Master Sergeant Jeremy Brown's current attorney for his DC case, C. Stewart. Jeremy was moved at 5:15am this morning under the cover of darkness. Stewart believes he is being moved to the Philadelphia FDC. He believes that they may try to have Jeremy killed in the "gang and tribe run" "hellhole" Today at 5:15pm on @SeanParnellUSA podcast, I'll show you why I too believe this, using Jeremy's own words in an interview I conducted with him last year. @POTUS @realDonaldTrump needs to intervene immediately. It's well-beyond just "a J6 conviction" at this point. @elonmusk @laralogan @RogerJStoneJr @hodgetwins

@end_lawfare - Stewart Country Law PA

FREE JEREMY BROWN - SOS to the WH and POTUS' fabulous legal team 🧵 1/ Why The Pardon Applies: Jeremy Brown’s FL conviction is 100% "J6 related.” Jeremy was arrested and imprisoned based on J6 allegations. Bottom Line: After his D.C. case was dismissed, the US Marshals decided yesterday at the DC Jail (where Jeremy was moved for trial) when the J6ers were moved for US Marshall transport, that Jeremy does not qualify for pardon and release because of the FL case conviction. The case is on appeal in the 11th Circuit. His appeal derives from the FL Middle District conviction in Tampa that arose from an illegal, out of jurisdiction search warrant for J6 charges.

CannConActual
Posted - December 14, 2024 at 4:54 PM
Saved - December 16, 2024 at 6:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been discussing the ongoing investigation into ActBlue and campaign money laundering, particularly the use of foreign gift cards. Representatives like Bryan Steil and Jim Jordan are involved, with insights from Peter Bernegger, who originally uncovered this issue. ActBlue recently claimed to have tightened data capture, but it seems to be just a semantic change. This isn't limited to one party or a few countries; it's a broader issue. I encourage everyone to verify the information through the FEC website and examine donations in their area.

@CannConActual - CannCon

🧵 ActBlue, et al Campaign Money Laundering Thread (the one being investigated by Congress) Now, lets break some news: In the past few weeks (and overall, the last year), @RepBryanSteil @RepJamesComer and @Jim_Jordan as well as @marcorubio have been looking into ActBlue, among others, for campaign money laundering using foreign gift cards to launder money to political campaigns. @PeterBernegger and his team originally discovered this massive money laundering operation. It was reported on by @OKeefeMedia and @JamesOKeefeIII. They called it "Smurfing" This thread will disclose some new information Peter broke on our podcast last night, Why We Vote, with @AsheinAmerica and @BadlandsMedia_ **All of this information can be validated yourself by visiting Peter's website (electionwatch info) or going to FEC gov and searching your zip code for people over the age of 65 and either unemployed or retired. Download the spreadsheet and sort the donations by name to see what's going on in your zip code. Remember: this is ALL GOV'T SUPPLIED DATA from the FEC! @jsolomonReports @JustTheNews @gatewaypundit @dbongino @KanekoaTheGreat @BehizyTweets @SeanParnellUSA @TalkMullins @mattgaetz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Peter reveals findings related to U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin's campaign, indicating potential criminal money laundering. Data from the FEC shows numerous identical contributions made by individuals across the country at the exact same time, suggesting the use of computer bots to funnel money into her campaign. This method, referred to as "smurfing," appears to be a new technique alongside existing methods that involve both federal and state-level contributions. Peter explains that while some contributions are visible in the FEC database, others are hidden at the state level, requiring extensive data collection for comparison. He emphasizes that these tactics have not changed and are still being used to support Baldwin's campaign, similar to methods seen in other political campaigns.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, Peter, let's let's break some news here. You sent me over a a screenshot here, and I wanna go ahead and pull that up now. And, walk me through what we're looking at here. Speaker 1: Sure. Our guys, ran what we call the Roberts. And there's more than just this example, but we were looking through the data of US senator Tammy Baldwin, who's senator for Wisconsin, very liberal, senator. She, has cheated. We found now in every single one of her campaigns whereby she's criminally laundering money into her campaigns. This here this this data that we're gonna show you is from the FEC. We found it and just compiled it together. We didn't change anything. This is what we call the Roberts. So on the left hand first column, you'll see all the Roberts. These people live across the United States in different states. There's no possible way that they know each other. The second column you'll see is a number of 1,786. That is the number of contributions that those Roberts made on one particular day in the particular minute, the same minute that these donations were made. Then you go over to the next column which shows $22,963.87. Those are dollars. So what's the odds of taking a snapshot at a particular time on a particular day all for US senator Tammy Baldwin's campaign and you come up with all these Roberts with this exact same number of contributions, for the exact same dollar amounts, at the exact same time, on the exact same date. That is absolutely impossible. And what's happening is this is showing you that computer bots are, from the bad actors are loading money in through the system, laundering it into Tammy Baldwin's campaign. That's what this proves. Speaker 0: Peter, what's the first known occurrence of this type of smurfing that you've seen? When when when? Speaker 1: Well, this this is a a shot. This data came from her campaign that she ran for the election this year, and and she she so called 1. I don't think she did, but she so called 1 on November 5th. And this data shot was taking we found it about 3 months prior to November 5th. Speaker 0: What what I'm getting at, Peter, is, you know, it's been a little over, a year now, I believe, since O'Keefe broke this story, with the Smurfing and going door to door. Is this their way of pivoting to another technique or did this was this running, concurrent with the the Smurfing that we know where they'll use one individual and and make you know, am I making sense with Speaker 1: that question? They haven't changed their methods. There are different methods of Smurfing. The good example again is the ones that will show up nationally in the FEC database, but then there's the multistate ones that will not show up on the FEC database. They're all at a state level. And then you have to go to all each state has their own, finance campaign finance committee or commission or agency, and you have to go to that all 50 of them, get all the data, download it and run comparisons between them all. And that's what we did. That's how we found these. So not the ones up on the screen but, the ones, the multistate Smurfs. Now here's a third way. So you get the the the regular FEC little old lady donating her her name and identity being used, then you get the multistate Smurfs that don't show up in the federal level. That's those 2 ways. Here's a third way with the Roberts that you see right here. So so they're doing it different ways and, we haven't seen them change. They they're still for the November 5th election, they loaded it up. And this is exactly how, Harris got this 1,000,000,000 of dollars in her campaign is through criminal money laundering. That's how she did it. Speaker 0: Wow. This is, this is unbelievable.

@CannConActual - CannCon

This past week, @JustTheNews published an article about Rep. Steils investigation. In it, ActBlue claimed that in September, they changed their data capture to require the CVV numbers on credit cards be submitted. But did that make a difference?? Nope. It was a semantics game. Here what Peter had to say:

Video Transcript AI Summary
ActBlue changed its donation process in September to require CVV numbers to prevent foreign donations. However, there hasn't been a noticeable drop-off in donations since this change. The information provided by ActBlue was misleading; they only require CVV numbers for new accounts opened after the change. This means that hundreds of thousands of existing donors are still not subject to this requirement, which was not clearly communicated.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So we also learned this week, Peter, that ActBlue back in September, changed, I guess, you know, the way that they accept donations to to capture the CVV, to require that, and to try and stop, foreign, donations from coming in. Had you seen in your investigation any drop off following that September, change that ActBlue implemented? Speaker 1: No. And they were very misleading about it, and I pointed it out to the 20 state attorney generals is they said they would start then enforcing or using the CVV number. Well, what they did tell you is we had to find out through a different source is that they were only gonna be requiring the CVV numbers on new accounts opened thereafter. So they have 3, 4, 500,000 donors already that they're not gonna use the CVV number on. And and they, you know, conveniently omitted that.

@CannConActual - CannCon

This isn't just ActBlue though. And it's not just Democrats. Remember: Election Integrity is NON-PARTISAN.

Video Transcript AI Summary
ActBlue is the largest among many organizations, including EMILY's List and the DCCC, that use the same software for fundraising, which some view as a corrupt scheme. This system allows Democrats to significantly out-fundraise Republicans, not due to greater grassroots support, but allegedly through illegal fundraising practices. If you exclude questionable funds, Republicans may actually raise more. This disparity in fundraising contributes to the perception of a balanced political landscape, which some argue is misleading. There are claims of election fraud and mail-in ballot issues, suggesting the political split might be closer to 75% for Republicans and 25% for Democrats, contrary to the perceived 50/50 balance.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's right. I mean, I I wanted to clarify too it's not just ActBlue. ActBlue is the biggest, but there's 100 who are participating like EMILY's List, the DCCC, the DNC, hundreds of other organizations who are participating in doing the exact same money laundering because they bought the software from Jonathan Zucker who created it back when he was working with ActBlue. So they were just they just buy the software and use the same, corrupt scheme, schemes to fund their campaigns. And this is exactly why when you think about it, step back and look at all the republican campaigns or candidates and their opposing candidates, so the the liberal candidates. And look at they all dramatically, the democrats out fundraise the republicans. This is why It's not because they have a whole bunch more support of of real citizens writing actually writing checks to help support their liberal candidates. No. If if fact that any anything, if you take out the Smurfing money, it's the Republicans who out fundraise them. But the Democrats are cheating again and and and raising these funds illegally, criminally, and that's why you always see this big disparity in the, well, you know, the Republican raised 10,000,000. Well, then the the Democrat raised 22,000,000. That's this is why this is why it's happening. Speaker 1: And and that's a great point. That's one of the the pillars of them conveying to the American people that we are a balanced nation 5050, basically 5050 Democrat Republican, and we're not. I I don't I firmly believe that we are not. Between what you're disclosing here, mail in ballot fraud, election fraud in general, I I firmly believe that it's probably closer as president Trump has alluded to, maybe 7525.

@CannConActual - CannCon

It's not just "Iran, China, Russia, Venezuela," as is constantly the only countries referenced by Congress. It's not just those four. One of them will shock you! (or maybe not)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Foreign interference is a pressing issue, primarily linked to countries like Iran, China, Russia, and Venezuela. China is confirmed to be involved, and Ukraine is also significant due to U.S. Treasury funds being sent there. This funding, approved by Congress, is often laundered through various offshore accounts and organizations, eventually returning as dark money to political campaigns in the U.S., particularly benefiting the DNC. John McCain and Lindsey Graham have played key roles in this process, which is why there is a strong push to support Ukraine. The laundering process is extensive, with money passing through thousands of organizations before reaching its final destination in political campaigns.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wow. And, like you said, this is coming, and is being reported. This is, you know, foreign interference essentially. This is coming from foreign countries. Before the show we were talking, I noticed that when they when they say it's a foreign country, the the the only countries they ever mentioned is Iran, China, Russia, and Venezuela. Now on the last show we were on, you had said that you could confirm the China thing, but you also had mentioned, Ukraine. Can you tell us more, what's led you to that? Speaker 1: 100% China's involved in this, and, the other one is, Ukraine. And the reason we're trying that Ukraine is not on that list, I can guarantee it because that money is coming from the US Treasury. So US Congress is obviously, approving that to send the 1,000,000,000 of dollars to Ukraine. And then what happens is, and I've said this before, part of that money then goes and gets laundered to offshore bank accounts, and it eventually ends up back into dark money packs in in, United States, which of course in turn give it to like the DNC and others like that and using ActBlue and it ends right back up into the, politicians campaigns. And and I tell you who started some of this is, John McCain and Lindsey Graham. And Lindsey Graham is still doing it today. This is why they're so deathly afraid of having Ukraine exposed and why they they just beyond all reason keep sending money and begging them to lower their inscription rate for the soldiers from 25 to 18 to send more young men to slaughter, because they don't want all this coming up. Not even getting to the biolabs, and and the other corruption with the Bidens. We're talking about US Treasury money that gets approved by our US Congress and Senate and gets gets sent to Ukraine and then it comes it gets laundered through, you know, 10, 20, 30, even tens of thousands of organizations. And we publish videos on this. You can find on Rumble showing the connections where you'll see dollars go through 10,000 different private organizations before it then gets to a political campaign. That's how big this is.

@CannConActual - CannCon

Bernegger also believes that President Trump is not only aware of this, but his pick for AG, @PamBondi is going to have a criminal complaint submitted by Rep. Steils when she is sworn in. We must keep pressure on this massive criminal operation!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Exciting news: President Trump is aware of Smurfing, having retweeted two related tweets and commented on an article. Additionally, Congressman Brian Stiles is referring Pam Bondi for potential criminal prosecution of ActBlue regarding money laundering. This is significant as it opens the door for an investigation into Smurfing. Furthermore, it's crucial for the FEC to be informed about these issues. If they aren't aware, there should be safeguards in place to prevent such occurrences. Among the six FEC commissioners, at least one is honest and committed to addressing these concerns.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The the big news I wanna announce though, if people don't know, this is exciting, is that first president Trump knows about Smurfing because he's retweeted 2 of my tweets about Smurfing. He's he's commented about the Gateway Pundit article, on Smurfing, and this goes back maybe a few months. But the news I have is that, US Congressman Brian Stiles is referring for criminal prosecution to Pam Bondi, assuming she gets, confirmed to, prosecute and at least investigate, if not, and prosecute ActBlue for criminal money laundering. So that's huge news that she's gonna get a referral to, look into this and look into Smurfing. Speaker 1: Absolutely. My my next question after the ActBlue was 100%, the FEC has to. If the if the FEC doesn't know about this, which you seem to, have, evidence at least that suggested, you know, complaints that they should, you know, be aware of this, If if they're if they're not aware of this, they need to have some sort of a a a a safeguard, you know, like checks in place to make sure that this kind of thing doesn't happen. Speaker 0: Well, since since we're on this subject, there's one person that there are 6 commissioners assigned or appointed to the FEC, and I will disclose you that there's at least one honest one. That's all I'll say. Speaker 1: Okay.

@CannConActual - CannCon

All of this can be validated yourself. The smurfs are real. Just visit the FEC website and pick a zip code, search 'ActBlue' as the recipient and donors aged 65+ and "unemployed" or "retired". Then you can download a spreadsheet of all of the donors and sort by name. I walked my listeners through how to do this over a year ago: https://rumble.com/v5evrd1-illegals-and-iillegal-votes-in-our-elections-cann-con-clips.html?e9s=src_v1_upp

Illegals and illegal votes in our elections - Cann Con Clips If you didn't think Illegals were voting in our elections, think again! rumble.com
CannConActual
Posted - November 1, 2024 at 7:51 PM
Saved - November 2, 2024 at 3:50 PM

@CannConActual - CannCon

Colorado law is EXPLICITLY clear. Jena and the culprits MUST be arrested and charged. They DESTROYED a Gold Star mother and elected official using the same predicate. Except she DIDNT do it. Griswold’s OWN OFFICE did. https://t.co/EjU3KvXT3E

@ShawnSmith1776 - Shawn Smith - Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes

When ONE, PARTIAL (redacted) voting sys BIOS password was posted online (NOT BY @Clerk_Peters), it was predicate for a @pweiser crim. investigation, w/@FBI assist, of Clerk Peters. @COSecofState posted 600+ unredacted BIOS passwords online. Arrest @JenaGriswold.

CannConActual
Posted - March 2, 2024 at 5:58 AM
Saved - March 4, 2024 at 1:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Fulton County case reveals a potential self-inflicted problem that could challenge the "no widespread fraud" narrative. It appears that there was no signature verification done, which is concerning. A cybersecurity expert, @ParikhClay, provides a breakdown and shares his experience with voting system testing.

@CannConActual - CannCon

THIS is why I believe the Fulton County case implosion is self-inflicted. This case would DESTROY the “no widespread fraud” narrative. This sure in the hell sounds like they did NO signature verification in Fulton. You can see the moment the judge realizes “holy shit.” https://t.co/A8c1h4QdVD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discussed issues with scanning envelopes due to jamming in the printer. They mentioned problems with the BlueCrest machine for signature verification. The request for scanned images of outer envelopes from November 2020 was not fulfilled. The discussion then shifted to obtaining signature exemplars and reference images for voters, which would require checking multiple databases for 860,000 voters. The process of finding signatures in the databases was explained in detail. The conversation also touched on absentee ballot application forms.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, well, the on the envelopes themselves, they are in a physical format, and you actually have to do them 1 by 1 because they're they're used envelopes. So if you try to scan them in in batches, they will just jam in the printer. Okay. Speaker 1: What do you think, mister Speaker 2: Yes. So I this is right. I think I could short circuit this tremendously. I think you told me. My understanding from talking with my my colleague earlier is that the BlueCrest sorting and signature verification machine was not operational. So I didn't really want new scanned images. I wanted the existing scanned images that were done on November 3rd for purposes of signature verification. So my understanding is that did not occur because the BlueCrest mesh verification machine was not working for the 2020 general. Speaker 0: Judge, I'm I'm not commenting on that. Speaker 1: If you go this way, it takes you to the short way. Yeah. Alright. We've got someone It's not that much fun. It was do I know who that is? Okay. Mister Lexus. Okay. Speaker 0: I'm not commenting on on whether or not the BlueCrest machines were were working. We we didn't use the BlueCrest machines, at that time period. Speaker 1: Okay. So if the subpoena as intended by mister Floyd is for the image any images produced by this machine on this date. Your response is you don't have any in your possession. Speaker 0: That's correct, judge. Speaker 2: So so they're Can you go Speaker 1: ahead and give me some Give me Speaker 2: a second, your honor. Sure. Speaker 1: Off mute. Speaker 3: No. I Speaker 0: don't do. Speaker 2: Alright. I can have my tech guy appear on-site under this under this tech supervision. He can write a script Speaker 0: that can Speaker 2: once we scan all the files, we can, have a script that automatically blocks out the date of birth. That is the that is PII under Georgia law. Speaker 0: Well, we stopped Well, Speaker 1: we're we're jumping back in time to the envelopes. Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 1: So on the on the envelopes, you're saying that you think you have a more efficient way to redact them? Speaker 2: Correct. I have a more efficient way, but I just my colleague is saying that they didn't do signature verification using the, Bluecrest sorting and signature verification machine? Correct. Okay. And so Speaker 1: Is that solely the 57000 hours estimate? I'm sorry. Speaker 0: Are we on to the next one? Speaker 1: Oh, we hadn't gotten there. Okay. We're still just on the 150 hours. Yeah. Okay. And is that where the Bluecrest becomes relevant? At I'm looking at mister Floyd's team. Speaker 2: Oh, okay. I'm sorry. Yeah. Your honor, the BlueCrest sorting and signature verification machine would take the ballot envelope and scan it and create an image of it. Image appears on screen with a signature exemplar, and the 2 are compared that way. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 2: So my understanding is now the BlueCrest sorting and signature verification machine was not working? Speaker 0: Or No. We we didn't use it. Speaker 1: They did they did they did not use that. Speaker 2: Not use it. Speaker 1: So for the item you're requesting to obtain for the scans of all the outer envelopes, they're gonna have to they would have to rescan those again is what we're hearing. Speaker 2: Well, it sounds like they weren't they were never scanned to begin with. And so I don't know. I'm I'm So If we're scanned, I want the scanned version Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 2: That they had on that day. Speaker 1: So are there any are there any documents in the county's possession of these items having already been scanned? Speaker 0: Not that I'm aware of, but I can check at headquarters and see if they do have it. Speaker 1: Okay. So the difference here is not so much that there's a total new rescanning. It's what was scanned and is still in your possession from that date. Well Speaker 2: Are we Speaker 1: are we are we making the distinction here? Speaker 3: Nothing was scanned, your honor. Speaker 1: Okay. And just so we're absolutely clear, we're talking about the outer return envelopes in November 2020. Okay. So where does that leave your subpoena requests? Speaker 2: I think, your honor, if we can put that to the side, I guess, as an as an item for me to work out with the county. So I understand exactly because I was under the impression that they had a sorting machine that did all that. So if that signature verification process was not used, I just wanna be able to see what so I can when we do our audit, we can look at it and say, okay. This is what was done. And and I'll see whether I actually need those or not. I don't I'm not sure at this point. Speaker 1: Got it. That takes us on, does this now take us to the signature exemplars and reference images, or is that the same thing? Speaker 0: This takes us to that new section, judge. Speaker 2: The c yeah. The signature exemplars is under the same section. Speaker 1: Same issue. Speaker 2: Same image. Yeah. Yeah. But not it's a different image. It's a separate image from the ballot envelope image. One is signed on the back. Okay. And they use that. So so this Speaker 1: whole section, you're setting that aside for now? Yes. Speaker 2: I'm setting that aside. Speaker 1: Okay. Then that takes us to absentee ballot application forms. Speaker 2: Actually, no. I'm sorry. I apologize. We do want 45 or 40 number 44, the provide all signature exemplars and reference images for all registered voters. Speaker 1: Okay. So that is the 57000 hour response and Speaker 2: Actually, Judge, it's just the signature exemplars. Those are digital. That should be another copying of of a digital file, massive file. Speaker 0: So, Judge, we do not have a file of simply signatures. We actually have them in different databases for different voters, and we're looking at 860,000 voters and we have 2 different systems that we have to look in to ensure that we do find a signature because if it's done in one it could be in the other. So at 860,000, unless conservatively say we can check each system in 2 minutes, we're looking at 4 minutes per. So 860,000 multiplied by 4 minutes gives us 3 million plus minutes. You divide that by 60. Speaker 1: Okay. A lot of time. So what is it that you're doing in those 4 minutes exactly per voter? Speaker 0: We're gonna check one system to see if we can find a signature. And if it's not there, we'll check the other system. Speaker 1: Then why do we need to check either system? Why not just have both if we think they're in there somewhere? Speaker 0: I'm not following. Speaker 1: So as as I'm understanding it, there's just a general database that has all these signatures in it. Well, well Why do we need to cross reference them? Speaker 0: No. It's it's not it's not a database of signatures. We actually have to go into the the database and find the the voter and look up look at the information and search through and find the signature wherever it may fall. And then when we get that we, I guess, export it somewhere, have it printed. If it's not in that database, we go look in the other database to find it. The next one? Speaker 1: So, essentially, you have a database with each voter as its own folder or file in some way. And to go in and pull out the signature image, that's what's taking the time? Speaker 3: Yes, sir. So for each voter, I would have to put in your driver's license number or your voter registration number. I then have to go to your profile to see if you actually have a signature on file. If in the Georgia, if in the registration database Georgia's registration database you don't have a signature on file, We have an in house electronic, database that we, scan documents into and we check that. There are no guarantees that we'll have all 860,000 signatures. The hope is that we will. Speaker 2: We're we're not looking for 800

@CannConActual - CannCon

Here’s the breakdown with @ParikhClay, a cybersecurity expert with 9 years experience with Voting System testing and the man who discovered the 19” ballots on 20” paper in Maricopa County. https://t.co/sVOUDVxQjh

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses issues with the Fulton County case, specifically regarding the lack of signature verification. It highlights discrepancies in the handling of ballots and equipment purchases that were not utilized. The speakers express disbelief at the inefficiencies and potential fraud in the election process. The transcript emphasizes the need for proper verification procedures and questions the validity of the Georgia election certification.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 1,000 multiplied by 4 minutes gives us 3,000,000 plus minutes. You divide that by 60. Speaker 1: Okay. A lot of time. Okay. We can there there we can stop. So let me let me just let's start at the beginning with the blue crest sorter. It's isn't this a cluster? This this is why the Fulton County case is tanking, dude. This is why. This is my And this Speaker 2: when they showed that right then and there, that's when I said, damn. Head's gonna swell because he's gonna be right. Because they gotta throw this case out some way, somehow, because they just admitted so much. Speaker 1: They just admitted that they didn't do signature verification in Fulton County at all. Speaker 2: What? No. No. They didn't, Kent County. This is what they did for that big county. They took the physical ballot, and they said, oh, wait. Wait. Okay. Bob Humphreys. And then they said, okay. And they match. And that's how they had to do it, obviously. Speaker 1: So let's let's another way. Speaker 2: Let's let's let's crazy. Is. Speaker 1: Let's look at this, Clay. Let's look at this here because this is a, this is from Fulton County. You guys can see the website up here. It's straight from fultoncounty.gov. Alright? And, right here, this is a an invoice about, outdated, not paid timely invoices. What's that first one say right there, Clay? Can you read that for me? Speaker 2: DMT Solutions Bluecrest. Whatever that is. Speaker 1: How much is that for? Wow. Jesus Christ. You paid a whole $87,000. And let me read to you the explanation of what they needed. Here it is. It says the original AML was for 57,601. I was informed there would be modifications upgrade to the mailing equipment because of a change in envelopes to mail absent ballots by state. The increase in cost needs needed approval and funding identified by the COO, which caused delay in processing of payment. They had and I I I have other document documentation on the Bluecrest orders, but they had the equipment. They bought it. It was it was very expensive. I wanna say it was over $1,000,000 for them to buy. I think they bought 3 machines, and I'd have to dig through and find all this stuff. But they didn't use it at all. Speaker 2: Hey. This is this is what just just threw me for a loop watching it when y'all fur when y'all first televised it. I just it's so crazy. They did no signature verification at all. They couldn't have. There's no way. There is no way it it was done. You have to run it through the machine. Alright? The the other hours and all that stuff, I'm sure we'll get to. But that that to me, I I know they were there for the subpoena items, but if I was the judge, I I woulda had to interrupt and say, excuse me, judge. Then how were the signatures verified? I know that's irrelevant right now, and you can tell me I'm out, but I would at least get that so the court recorder would have had it written down. Because that that to me was an admission of guilt that they Speaker 1: So real real quick, just to just to let everybody know that what what I just played for you, I put it in the chat. That was the hearing to talk about the subpoenas that Harrison Floyd, the guy I talked about earlier in the show, that he put together to try and, get election evidence. You know, he's the one that said his attorneys said, you know, what if we prove that Trump won? The elect this this indictment goes away. This Rico case goes away if we prove that Trump won. And so this was Fulton County excuse me, the Georgia Secretary of State, they agreed to comply with the subpoena. They had to amend it a little bit, but they agreed to to to comply with the subpoena. And what that did is it essentially threw Fulton County under the bus. Because if if if if big brother says that we'll do it and it's okay, when little brother says, no, we're not gonna do it, it's like, yo, they already said that they would, so you have to. You know, the precedent's already kinda been laid out there. And so they went through a list of all the things that they were requesting, and they talked about the exorbitant number of hours that would take them to do this. Poll tapes. So they're like, oh, they're 12 feet long, so it's gonna take us 4 hours to scan each one. And they're like, we'll we'll we'll buy you a scanner that you can do it in in one's, you know, one's fail swoop. And, you know, the judge agreed. They said, okay. Sure. We'll we'll take your your equipment, blah blah blah, and all this stuff. But then you get down to that. And, Clay, you you did a lot of work in Maricopa County. You did a lot of work, you know, with the with the lake trial and everything. And a lot of what was involved in that and what we saw in in in, Matt Thayer's documentary on Maricopa, what was it, state of denial, was we we actually saw how the signature verification is done. And just if you wanna explain it, because what they ex described here, it's impossible to do it efficiently. Speaker 2: Right. Because here's the thing. They had to track initially when all the envelopes come in. They run them through the big machine, and as it scanned through, that image is created right then. And the thing is the way it was in Maricopa, Runbeck would transfer that those image files over there to them because they were done, 235 at a time in batches. Right? And then they're supposed to go through and verify the signatures. And as, you know, people who watch the documentary could see, they just they just clicked through it. At least they had both image files. And that's and believe me, looking at the report and the data that was generated by the machine for when they were doing this signature verification, just to let you know that it was a human being. It it it was software doing it. So there you you have no way of knowing because what was the tolerance set at? Right? And that and that's the thing. It it just blew my mind when they came out and said that they didn't use a machine at all. It's like so what did they have? Envelopes stacked up on the desk of each of the workers going through them? And then and this is where it gets worse because I'm glad you played it through because he said they had the exempt exemplars in 2 or 3 systems. So think about it, people. There's no automating machine doing it. There's stacks of envelopes on your deck. You're here with the laptop, and you're having to alright. This is so and so, and I search in this database, then I gotta search in another one. That's that's a bold faced lie. That that video is the evidence of fraud. The the Georgia election should have never been certified, period. End of story. I don't care whether you say it's fraud or not. It should've never been certified because that that is just it's beyond belief beyond belief.
CannConActual
Posted - January 12, 2024 at 9:28 PM
Saved - January 13, 2024 at 8:44 AM

@CannConActual - CannCon

I'll say this again: The Fulton Co "RICO" case is about to implode. And its 100% deliberate. If this case to goes to trial, it would *EXPOSE* the 2020 fraud in Fulton Co. It would destroy the MSM's parroting for the last 3 years of "safest election ever". Flag it. Again.

CannConActual
Posted - November 13, 2023 at 6:34 PM
Saved - November 13, 2023 at 6:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In Georgia, concerns about election integrity have been raised. An anomaly was discovered during a municipal election, where tabulators didn't match the number of scanned ballots. The cause remains inconclusive, but erroneous code was found in EAC certified systems. Similar issues were found in 64 out of 66 Georgia counties. Hand recounts revealed more ballots than recorded votes in several counties. Despite evidence, these anomalies have not been addressed. The Georgia Secretary of State declined a security upgrade. These issues raise questions about the integrity of the election process.

@CannConActual - CannCon

🧵 1/ Georgia Election Thread: John Eastman said this on Jan 6. I'll explain why that could be so significant to what happened in Georgia, and maybe elsewhere. This is not just important for election integrity, but also for the indictment of @hw_floyd and @realDonaldTrump

Video Transcript AI Summary
There was fraud in the election, including dead people voting. The machines played a role in this fraud. Instead of having hidden ballots, they stored them in a secret folder. After the polls closed, the machines matched unvoted ballots with unvoted voters. This was evident when the vote percentage reached 99% but the votes kept coming in. The denominator, which represents the remaining ballots, started increasing, indicating that they were unloading the hidden ballots and matching them to unvoted voters. This allowed them to barely cross the finish line with enough votes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We know there was fraud, traditional fraud that occurred. We know that dead people voted, but we now know because we caught it live last time in real time how the machines contributed to that fraud. And let me, as simply as I can, explain it. You know the old way was to have a bunch of ballots sitting in a box under the floor. And when you needed more, you pull them out in the dark of night. They put those ballots in a secret folder in the machines, sitting there waiting until they know how many they need. And then the machine, after the close of polls, we now know who's voted and we know who hasn't. And I can now, in that machine, match those unvoted ballots with an unvoted voter and put them together in the machine. And how do we know that happened last night in real time? You saw when it got to 99% of the vote total, and then it stopped. The percentage stopped, but the votes didn't stop. What happened and you don't see this on Fox or any of the other stations, but the data shows that the denominator how many ballots remain to be counted? How else do you figure out the percentage that you have? How many remain to be counted. That number started moving up. That means they were unloading the ballots from that secret folder, matching them matching them to the unvoted voter, and voila, we have enough votes to barely get over the finish line.

@CannConActual - CannCon

2/ On Oct 26, 2021, almost a year later, the TN Sec. State sent a report to the Elections Assistance Commission (EAC) about "an anomaly" during a municipal election on Dominion tabulators. 7 of 18 tabulators *did not match the number of ballots scanned.* https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/TestingCertification/EAC_Report_of_Investigation_Dominion_DSuite_5.5_B.pdf

Page not found | U.S. Election Assistance CommissionLock eac.gov

@CannConActual - CannCon

2 cont'd: This anomaly was discovered after an alert election worker found 163 ballots in a tabulator but only had 79 votes recorded by the machine. The other tabulator had 167 ballots inside of it but only recorded 19! Did these ballots end up in a "cache" secret folder??

@CannConActual - CannCon

3/ Williamson Co uses Dominion ICX BMDs to print/mark ballots and then tabulate them on Dominion ICP tabulators. The EAC's analysis that was performed by Pro V&V and SLI Compliance (voting systems test labs) *with* the EAC, Williams staff, TN SOS *AND* Dominion present.

@CannConActual - CannCon

4/ The report goes on to say that the "direct cause" is "inconclusive" --> Very important word. It also admits that "erroneous code" was found in the *EAC CERTIFIED* systems. *CERTIFIED* The explanation of a "misread of the QR code" is, according to many experts, "absurd".

@CannConActual - CannCon

5/ It's been explained to me that a QR code cannot be "misread". It's either read or its not read. For a scanner to "misinterpret" a bit and cause a ballot to incorrectly be designated "provisional" is extremely concerning. Especially when you see what happens next...

@CannConActual - CannCon

6/ The "misread" ballot (and all succeeding ballots) are also marked as "provisional". They don't reflect in the poll report totals. But they didn't just disappear. This is where Eastman's assertion over ONE YEAR *before* this report is so important.

@CannConActual - CannCon

7/ It's important to note that the problem was not "successfully fixed", as Dominion claims. Instead, some proverbial duct tape was thrown at it and the root cause was ignored. It'd be like resetting your Check Engine light and saying "my car is fixed!"

@CannConActual - CannCon

8/ Now here's how its relevant to what Eastman said about Georgia on January 6th! Georgia uses Dominion ICX BMDs and Dominion ICPs, much like Williamson. And much like Williamson, audit logs *and* evidence suggests the same thing may have happened in Georgia.

@CannConActual - CannCon

9/ The Elections Oversight Group (givesendgo.com/ElectionsOvers…) analyzed the system log files for 66 Georgia counties (acquired through Open Records Requests). In **64 out of 66 counties**, they found the same error messages as Williamson. https://gaballots.com/evidence/f/scanner-failures-in-georgia-match-the-williamson-error

The Williamson Tennessee ERROR is in 97% of Georgia Counties “That’s weird, it didn’t count all the votes.” gaballots.com

@CannConActual - CannCon

10/ Several GA counties had *more ballots* than recorded votes, as discovered during the hand-recount in Nov 2020. Those included Floyd Co (2600), Fayette (2700), Walton (284) and Douglas (293). Dekalb Co 2022 Dem Primary found 2810 extra votes in a hand count as well.

@CannConActual - CannCon

11/ It is worth noting that the hand-recount was off in Fulton by thousands and thousands of votes and had to double/triple scan ballots to make the numbers match. They entered a Consent Agreement admitting as much. Evidence suggests other counties were off as well.

@CannConActual - CannCon

12/ @TalkMullins was in Floyd County covering this discrepancy. It was reported by the GA SOS Office that this was because a USB wasn't properly uploaded. Officials in Floyd, in the presence of a Dominion rep, disagreed: https://x.com/TalkMullins/status/1328857648276574210?s=20

@TalkMullins - Heather Mullins

Floyd County, GA: After a FULL day of rescanning, counting, & software techs troubleshooting, election officials (while VERY transparent), still had NO answer as to what caused 2700 votes to go uncounted. Dominion techs said they could not comment. Listen to this! @RealAmVoice https://t.co/v6j9lMatXH

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 mentions the possibility of printing out something. Speaker 1 asks if there is an explanation for why certain votes were not counted. Speaker 2 clarifies that there is no concrete explanation for why those votes were not counted by the machine. Speaker 1 confirms that they do not know why the votes were not scanned. Speaker 2 asks if the Dominion Tech guys have figured out the reason, but Speaker 0 says they are not allowed to comment. Speaker 2 asks if it could be a memory card issue, but Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 both say they don't think so. Speaker 0 suggests it could be human error, but they don't have evidence to confirm it. Speaker 2 questions if it could be a software issue, but Speaker 0 avoids speculation. They admit they don't have a definite answer yet. Speaker 2 acknowledges this and thanks them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We could print it out. Speaker 1: Do we have a reason explanation why those votes Speaker 2: So there's no, like, concrete just to get on the record, There's no concrete explanation as to how those 26, 27 100 votes were not counted by the machine in the 1st place? Speaker 1: We don't know. I mean, we can't they're not in there anywhere. So we don't know why that It gets scanned in there. Speaker 2: So have the Dominion Tech guys that have been troubleshooting here all day been able to figure out why they weren't in there? Speaker 0: They're not allowed to comment. Speaker 2: They're not allowed to comment. And you're Speaker 0: not allowed to tell me you're out there. Rec Speaker 1: sorry. It just Speaker 2: But as of right now, you can also not confirmed that it was a memory card or anything of that nature as well. Right? Because that hasn't been confirmed to my knowledge by anyone here. Speaker 1: I don't think it was a memory card. I I can almost do you? Speaker 0: I don't think it was a memory card. Speaker 2: So it wasn't we we can rule out with Speaker 1: memory cards. Memory card that wasn't scanned. Speaker 0: Yeah. Okay. It seems like it's human error. Speaker 2: It seems like it, but what what's the evidence that would indicate it would be a human error issue? Speaker 0: The the the ballots didn't transfer over like they should have, and that could have been dealing with how whatever program or program them. But at this point, we rack. Don't know, so that's why you're Speaker 2: Could also potentially be a software issue. Speaker 0: We're not going to speculate at this point. Speaker 2: But you just said it could potentially be a human error. That was speculation. Incorrect. Speaker 0: So that's why rack? Speaker 2: So then I Speaker 0: could these types of different questions. Speaker 2: I'm really trying to Speaker 0: give you any I know what you're trying to do. We really don't have a pinpointed right now. Like side? We want to be able to give you the exact answer on on what happened. Absolutely. I'm not able to do that right now. Speaker 2: Okay. Alright. Fair enough. Thank you Speaker 0: for that.

@CannConActual - CannCon

13/ This issue persisted in 2022 as well. Nothing suggests that this anomaly has even been considered in Georgia despite this evidence. In fact, the @GaSecofState has declined to "patch" their system with a security upgrade recommended after the Halderman report.

@CannConActual - CannCon

14/ In '20, GA was able to update machines with a "de minimis" patch in just a few days, but the vulnerabilities pointed out by @jhalderm apparently can't be applied with over 16 months (since report was released) until the '24 election. "Most secure election American history"

@CannConActual - CannCon

End/ Oh and, for another thread, the ACLU had unfettered access to Georgia's E-net, some on their PERSONAL computers, during the 2020 Election. Here's a veteran poll manager on what that could access could be used for: https://t.co/rtD68FKcM1

Video Transcript AI Summary
A person with unauthorized access to the Fulton County Department of Elections could potentially misuse it. They could find out who has an absentee ballot but hasn't returned it, and submit one on their behalf using blank absentee ballots. This raises concerns about potential malicious activities.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So let's let's let's put on tinfoil hats just for a second here. And I'm not you're not making any allegations or anything, but this is just, potentially, what could a malicious person do with that type of access that's not affiliated with the, you know, Fulton County, Department of Elections? Speaker 1: Then they could look and see who has an absentee ballot out and hasn't turned it in, and they could turn 1 in for them. If they had access to a bunch of blank, no stub absentee ballots somewhere.
CannConActual
Posted - November 6, 2023 at 4:08 AM
Saved - November 6, 2023 at 7:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In Fulton County, the absence of documents was acknowledged in Curling v. Raffensperger. A revealing situation unfolds as criminals falsely accuse citizens, disguising their own wrongdoing. The judge's decision will determine if the accused can prove their actions were aimed at exposing a crime.

@CannConActual - CannCon

Fulton County doesn't have the documents. They've admitted that a long time ago in a Request for Admissions in Curling v. Raffensperger. We are watching a crime being exposed while the criminals accuse citizens of crimes camouflaged as a RICO case that will expose their own wrongdoings. Now, let's see if the judge allows the accused to exonerate themselves from a crime by proving they were exposing a crime. 🍿

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the request for a copy of every ballot in Fulton county, expressing concerns about privacy and the impact on the election certification. Speaker 1 clarifies that the experts reviewing the ballots are only interested in the results, not individual voters. They argue that some requested records may not exist, which is why they are hesitant to turn them over. Speaker 1 mentions a pending case to unseal records, both in this jurisdiction and another civil case. The conversation briefly touches on the docket and the involvement of Judge McBurnie, as well as the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I think this is gonna, this would understandably, I think, raised some alarms that you're asking to have a copy of every single ballot in Fulton county. And you're going to be able to know everyone who lived in Fulton county, exactly how they voted. Speaker 1: That's not entirely correct. Okay. Speaker 0: Correct me. Speaker 1: So we're looking for our experts to review they don't the experts do not care who voted. That's not their, their shtick. They're looking to see what the result actually was. You see, there's, They have a major discrepancy. The reason why they don't want to turn it over is because I submit judge that a lot of the stuff that we've asked for, they simply don't have, and they don't want to tell you at all because for obvious reasons it impacts the certification of the election itself This court has authority as a superior court under 21 dash two dash five hundred to unseal any records. And there is a pending case in this, Jurisdiction, I believe where those there's a motion to unseal that has been filed. Speaker 0: So in this case, Speaker 1: Yeah, this case, I thought it was in another pending case as well. Speaker 0: Well, it is, but okay. When you say other pending case, what do you mean? Speaker 1: There's a civil case, the, Speaker 0: the Raffensperger one that's referenced in your response. Speaker 1: Not, not curling. That's a, that's a federal case. It's a local case, but my colleague is Speaker 0: Fabarito at all versus Wynn at all, your honor. And do you know which docket that's in? I believe judge McBurnie had it or has it? It's still open? Speaker 1: Yes, sir. Okay. Speaker 0: It just came back from the, Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals. Alright.
CannConActual
Posted - September 2, 2023 at 3:54 PM
Saved - September 3, 2023 at 3:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Fulton County allegedly deleted evidence that could exonerate Trump in the Willis case and potentially prove he won Georgia by 2000 votes. The authenticity of the August 2020 election is also in question. We hope to obtain the Cast Vote Record and Fulton County to provide ballot images or physical ballots.

@CannConActual - CannCon

Fulton Co. deleted evidence, against state and federal law, that would not just exonerate President Trump in Willis’s case, but based on the Cast Vote Record for those deleted files, it would prove Trump won Georgia by >2,000 votes. Phony Willis’s election Aug 2020 is in question, too. We’ll bring the Cast Vote Record. Hopefully Fulton can bring the ballot images or physical ballots. @realLizUSA @KevinMoncla @DavidShafer @hw_floyd @barnes_law @dbongino

@CannConActual - CannCon

For some reason, the first post cut out this one (it's the page above the ones listed in the first post): https://t.co/jtod4BrFkr

CannConActual
Posted - June 6, 2023 at 4:26 PM
Saved - June 23, 2023 at 10:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Hunter Biden's emails reveal a pay-for-play scheme between the Biden VP office, Hunter Biden, Burisma, and former Clinton advisor Sally Painters Blue Star Strategies. The deal involved top US officials expressing their support for Burisma. Hunter's partner Eric Schwerin assured Burisma exec Vadym Pozharskyi that Blue Star understood the scope and deliverables. Pozharskyi signed the contract and wired the retainer. Blue Star offered minutes from a phone call with the White House regarding Biden's upcoming trip to Ukraine. Hunter had a significant part in the negotiation. The events took place in Nov-Dec 2015, and Biden was fired in Dec 2015.

@CannConActual - CannCon

Crucial Thread: Biden exposed 1/8: This FBI 1023 form info is great and all, but let me serve you up the evidence against Hunter and Joe Biden on a silver platter @RepJamesComer: Hunter’s emails outline a coordinated “pay for play” between the Biden VP office, Hunter Biden, Burisma’s Vadym Pozharskyi and former Clinton advisor Sally Painter’s Blue Star Strategies. Here is the initial email about the “deal”:

@CannConActual - CannCon

2/8: Pozharskyi (Burisma exec) wants to make sure that he will get “concrete tangible results” and notes that the contract doesn’t contain any names of “top US officials”. He asks if this was done deliberately (which is confirmed that it was in a follow up email):

@CannConActual - CannCon

3/8: Pozharskyi then explains what he considers “deliverables”: “top US officials” expressing their “positive opinion” and support for Burisma. Read for yourself:

@CannConActual - CannCon

4/8: Hunter’s partner, Eric Schwerin, assured Pozharskyi that Sally Painter of Blue Star “understands the scope and the deliverables”:

@CannConActual - CannCon

5/8: Pozharskyi seems content and signs the contract, says he will wire the $60k retainer today, and that he would like to set up a conference call for @POTUS’s trip in **Nov-Dec 2015.**

@CannConActual - CannCon

6/8: Blue Star then offers up minutes from a phone call with the White House regarding Biden’s upcoming trip to Ukraine. Pozharskyi (Burisma) is CC’d in the email:

@CannConActual - CannCon

7/8: Sounds like Hunter, who was on the board of Burisma at the time, had a significant part in this negotiation between a former Clinton aide’s company, and Burisma with “top US officials” as the “deliverable”. I wonder who that “top US official” could be…🤔🤔🤔

@CannConActual - CannCon

8/8 All this took place in Nov 2015 for a Nov-Dec 2015 message. What else happened in Dec 2015??? “The son of a bitch was fired!” https://youtu.be/hXjLqhtnIRI Hat tip @patel_patriot. Incredible work!

CannConActual
Posted - May 25, 2023 at 11:58 AM
Saved - May 25, 2023 at 12:11 PM

@CannConActual - CannCon

So let me get this straight: Sai Kandula planned, for 6 mnths, to take over our nation and "kill the President" if necessary, and had a Nazi flag in his U-Haul (most dangerous domestic threat!) that he crashed outside the WH. And the DOJ DOWNGRADED his charges to "depredation…

CannConActual
Posted - May 10, 2023 at 8:53 PM
Saved - May 10, 2023 at 10:49 PM

@CannConActual - CannCon

This is a REALLY bad look for Maricopa Co! How do you get around the CHIEF JUSTICE's OWN TEAM finding such a egregious error?! @KariLakeWarRoom @KariLake @ParikhClay

View Full Interactive Feed