TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @charliekirk11

Saved - December 23, 2025 at 10:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m tired of Candace being smeared as an ‘anti-Semite’; that’s a shallow tactic to silence truth-tellers. Candace flew 18 hours through a miserable Europe layover to attend the Jerusalem embassy opening, then toured the Holy Land with me. We prayed at the Western Wall and witnessed sites tied to Jesus’ life. Candace is a patriot, effective, calls out BS, and The Daily Wire is lucky to have her. Keep going, Candace.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Candace is being smeared as an 'anti-Semite' because that is the shallow way to get people to shut up and obey. Did you know Candace dropped everything to fly 18 hours through a miserable connection in Europe to get to the embassy opening in Jerusalem? We went to the embassy opening and then toured the Holy Land, an experience we will never forget. We prayed at the Western Wall, saw where Jesus was arrested and rose from the dead. We saw where our Lord and Savior healed the sick. Candace is a patriot, and she is effective. She calls out BS wherever she sees it. The Daily Wire is lucky to have her, and I genuinely hope they're able to resolve whatever issues are between them and focus on moving ahead with a unified front. Keep going, Candace.

Saved - September 30, 2025 at 10:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I confirm the hoax regarding "mass graves" of indigenous children at Canadian residential schools. After two years of excavations, no human remains were found. It seems Canada created a narrative of genocide to address racial guilt, leading to the vandalism of 83 churches, which Trudeau supported.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Hoax Confirmed. After claims of "mass graves" of indigenous children at residential schools across Canada, no human remains have been found after 2 years of excavations. Canada didn’t have racial guilt as a founding myth, so it invented a genocidal atrocity to atone for. Remember, 83 churches were burned down or vandalized over this and Trudeau said they deserved it.

Saved - September 22, 2025 at 12:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I faced accusations of being an anti-Semite and Holocaust denier for discussing a sensitive topic, but it seems I was right. Recent revelations indicate that Israeli officials had access to Hamas's detailed battle plan for the October 7 attack over a year prior. The plan, known as “Jericho Wall,” outlined a comprehensive strategy for a devastating assault, which Hamas executed with alarming accuracy, resulting in significant casualties. The document was deemed aspirational by Israeli military officials at the time.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

I was smeared as an anti-Semite and “Holocaust denier” for even broaching this topic. Turns out I was onto something….. “Israeli officials obtained Hamas’s battle plan for the Oct. 7 terrorist attack more than a year before it happened, documents, emails and interviews show. But Israeli military and intelligence officials dismissed the plan as aspirational, considering it too difficult for Hamas to carry out. The approximately 40-page document, which the Israeli authorities code-named “Jericho Wall,” outlined, point by point, exactly the kind of devastating invasion that led to the deaths of about 1,200 people. The translated document, which was reviewed by The New York Times, did not set a date for the attack, but described a methodical assault designed to overwhelm the fortifications around the Gaza Strip, take over Israeli cities and storm key military bases, including a division headquarters. Hamas followed the blueprint with shocking precision.” https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/30/world/middleeast/israel-hamas-attack-intelligence.html

Saved - September 22, 2025 at 5:37 AM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Tucker Carlson's monologue tonight is MUST WATCH. "The Trans movement is the mirror image of Christianity, and therefore its natural enemy." https://t.co/dkCbG1ij2X

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker argues parts of the transgender movement seem militant and dangerous, citing NPR's shift: "NPR is always as a matter of editorial policy, completely opposed the civilian ownership of firearms, with the possible exception of maybe IRS agents. Yet here suddenly was that same station, National Public Radio, positively urging trans people to buy guns, as many guns as possible, if necessary to use them." They say identifying as trans brings perks; then assert "The trans movement is the mirror image of Christianity and therefore its natural enemy in Christianity." The Nashville mass murder by "Audrey Hale" at a Christian school is discussed; media commentary claims "Christians were murdered in Tennessee because they infringed on the rights of transgender people." They cite "Trans Resistance Network" and Antifa "trans day of vengeance." Authorities withhold the manifesto; they argue "the trans movement is targeting Christians." Biden calls for "assault weapons ban."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was just last week that we noticed that parts of the transgender movement seem to be getting militant and possibly dangerous. We did a whole segment about it on Thursday night. That segment was sparred by an NPR segment we had heard and never expected to hear. NPR is always as a matter of editorial policy, completely opposed the civilian ownership of firearms, with the possible exception of maybe IRS agents. Yet here suddenly was that very same station, National Public Radio, positively urging trans people to buy guns, as many guns as possible, if necessary to use them. The world is dangerous, explained one trans gun owner. You have to be dangerous back. And that seems strange to us. Is The United States really a dangerous place for trans people? Well, West Baltimore is dangerous. You could easily get murdered there. But if you're trans in this country, obviously there are many downsides, but there do appear to be some benefits. It's a lot easier to get into Harvard, for example. It's definitely easier to get a job at Citibank or in the Biden White House. If you're transgender, can so much as fly a kite, the Pentagon will happily make you an F-thirty five pilot just so Hollywood can make a movie about it. Identifying as trans, whatever again, its downsides does convey status in this country, which is why so many young people now do. Not a lot of 19 year olds are pretending to be car mechanics or linemen for a regional power company in Eastern Ohio. But plenty of college freshmen do pretend to be members of the opposite sex. And why wouldn't they? The people in charge despise working class whites, but they venerate the trans community. People are just responding to incentives. It's rational in a way. But that does not explain the anger that we heard in that NPR segment. Why are some trans people so angry and why do they seem to be mad specifically at traditional Christians? We can't think of any trans person who's ever been murdered by a pastor. As far as we know, that has never happened. So it's not an actual threat of violence from Christians that's inspiring some trans people to buy AR-15s. No, it's it's got to be more fundamental than that. And it is the trans movement is the mirror image of Christianity and therefore its natural enemy in Christianity. The price of admission is admitting that you're not God. Christians openly can see that they have no real power over anything and for that matter, very little personal virtue. They will tell you to your face that they are sinful and helpless and basically absurd. They're not embarrassed about any of this. They brag about it. That saved a wretch like me goes the most famous Christian hymn ever written in English. The trans movement takes the opposite view. Trans ideology claims dominion over nature itself. We can change the identity we were born with. They will tell you with wild eyed certainty. Christians can never agree with this statement because these are powers they believe God alone possesses. That unwillingness to agree that failure to acknowledge a trans person's dominion over nature incites and enrages some in the trans community. People who believe their God can't stand to be reminded that they're not. So Christianity and transgender orthodoxy are wholly incompatible theologies. They can never be reconciled. They are on a collision course with each other. One side is likely to draw blood before the other side. That's what we concluded last week. Yesterday morning, tragically, our fears were confirmed. A self identified trans person called Audrey Hale committed mass murder at a Christian school in Nashville. Hale burst into a place called the Convent School and executed three nine year olds as well as three adults. Police have released body cam footage from the end of the massacre. We're showing you just a small part of it. You can see the rest online if you want. We're not gonna show it because it's too awful and sad. But what was almost as sickening to see in a far more subtle and insidious way was the media coverage of yesterday's tragedy. Here's Terry Moran of ABC News, for example, suggesting that Christians were murdered in Tennessee because they infringed on the rights of transgender people. Watch. Speaker 1: Audrey Hill was a identified herself as a transgender person. State of Tennessee earlier this month passed, the governor signed a bill that banned transgender medical care for minors, as well as law that prohibited adult entertainment, including male and female impersonators after a series of drag show controversies in that state. Speaker 0: The state of Tennessee bans the sexual mutilation of children. Children get shot to death in a school. It's cause and effect. That's what ABC News is telling you. That's not far from justifying mass murder. But others took the next step. A group called the Trans Resistance Network said that the shooter's death was a complex tragedy that resulted from quote anti trans bias. The Hershey chocolate company's new trans spokesman meanwhile, someone called Faye Johnstone posted messages after the shooting complaining about quote trans misogyny. In Canada, a taxpayer funded trans rights organization put out a statement that ignored the murder of the children in Nashville entirely and instead claimed there has been a quote exponential rise in anti trans violence. That is a lie. It's a provable lie. And in fact, the opposite is true. We seem to be watching the rise of transterrorism. The man who tried to murder Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh after the repeal of Roe v Wade identified as a quote trans gamer girl. The man who shot up a nightclub in Colorado in this past November and murdered five people identified as non binary. And now this and there could be more. Antifa has announced this coming Saturday is the quote trans day of vengeance. Vengeance for what? That's not explained. But the suggestion is there will be violence in Washington this weekend. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green tweeted about this today because if there's a day of vengeance coming, the rest of us should probably know about it. And for doing so, immediately had her her official congressional Twitter account suspended. You're not supposed to talk about any of this, apparently. And the authorities in Nashville certainly are not planning to talk about it. They're doing their best not to. Here's the police chief of Nashville explaining that, well, he's happy to talk about the shooter's guns. He's not gonna tell you anything about the shooter's motives. Watch. Speaker 2: So in the manifesto, there's several different writings about other locations. There were locations was, talks about the school. There was a map of the school, a drawing of how potentially she would enter and the salts that would take place. There's quite a bit of writing to it. I have not read the whole the entire manifesto. Our team and the FBI have been working on this. Speaker 0: Well, that's interesting. Within what seemed like minutes, we saw pictures of the rifles and the pistol. We now have horrifying body cam footage from within the school. So unsettling, we're not going to show it to you. But somehow we can't see the manifesto in which the killer explains why she killed. Why is that? It's not accidental. Well, you know exactly why it is because it would make the obvious undeniable. The trans movement is targeting Christians, including with violence. Most Christian leaders in this country don't want to admit that. Admitting it might force them to take deeply unfashionable positions. But it is true. And anyone who's paying attention knows that it's true. And so like most true things at this point, it is officially suppressed. Here, for example, is Joe Biden yelping again about how it's all your fault when these tragedies happen because you've got guns at home. This is from yesterday. Speaker 3: We have to do more to stop gun violence. It's ripping our communities apart, ripping the soul of this nation, ripping the very soul of the nation. And we we have to do more to protect our schools so they aren't turned into prisons. You know, the shooter in this situation reportedly had two assault weapons and a pistol, two AK 47. So I call on congress again to pass my assault weapons ban. Speaker 0: So we're going to prevent you from learning why the shooter did it. We don't have to guess because she wrote a whole manifesto about why she did it. And we know that she did that because she told a friend of hers on Instagram that she did it. But we can't see it. We can only talk about the guns. We can't know what kind of drugs she was taking, what kind of hormones or SSRIs or benzodiazepines. We can only guess. We can only talk about the guns. Pass my assault weapons ban. That'll fix the problem. But Joe Biden is lying about that. He knows that he's lying and you know that he's lying. Yesterday's massacre did not happen because of lax gun laws. Yesterday's massacre happened because of a deranged and demonic ideology that is infecting this country with the encouragement of people like Joe Biden. Let's start by being honest about that.
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 7:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I remind everyone not to confuse God's silence with His absence. We are all facing unique battles, yet we share a universal call. Right now, we need a revival of biblical womanhood.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

ERIKA KIRK: “All of us need to remember not to mistake God's silence for his absence, and really know that yes, we are all going through a unique battle right now. We are all in our own battlefield, separate, but also together, and I think the call for all of us right now is very universal. Our call is for a revival of biblical womanhood." @TPUSA @MrsErikaKirk

Video Transcript AI Summary
But all of us need to remember not to mistake God's silence for his absence and really know that, yes, we are all going through a unique battle right now. We are all in our own battlefield, separate but also together. And I think the call for all of us right now is very universal. And I've really prayed on this and I and I see it in Technicolor with how different waves of things that are happening in culture and in society, but then also seeing it through the the eyes of my child, is we our call is for a revival of biblical womanhood.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But all of us need to remember not to mistake God's silence for his absence and really know that, yes, we are all going through a unique battle right now. We are all in our own battlefield, separate but also together. And I think the call for all of us right now is very universal. And I've really prayed on this and I and I see it in Technicolor with how different waves of things that are happening in culture and in society, but then also seeing it through the the eyes of my child, is we our call is for a revival of biblical womanhood.
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 5:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I question whether a US-born transgender Ukrainian spokesman's warning to "hunt down" critics of the Ukraine war is a direct threat. If Biden could fire Viktor Shokin with a $1 billion loan guarantee, then getting rid of this individual should be easy. Let's make it happen.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Dear GOP, Is this a direct threat by US born transgender Ukrainian spokesman to "hunt down" Tucker Carlson? Steve Bannon? Charlie Kirk? Poso? Anyone they deem critical of the Ukraine war? This warning was recorded in English for a reason. If Biden could fire Viktor Shokin with $1 billion loan guarantee, then $150 billion later, firing this thug should be a piece of cake. Make it happen.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 warns about funding Ukrainian war effort, calling it "the official spokesperson" and saying English video targets the West, not the Kremlin. Zelensky and his "pack of mobsters" are accused of pressuring Americans and blaming critics like "Bannon, Tucker, Charlie Kirkshow, Jack Posobic" for resisting funding. He cites "a trans person who's an American born in English" as "an official broadcast of the Ukrainian military in English," calling the person "mentally deranged" and noting they are "trans." The broadcast allegedly threatens: "we are going to hunt down, murder anyone who is a Russian propagandist" with a 'assassination' of Kremlin propagandists. Speaker 1 adds: "Russia hates the truth... will be hunted down, and justice will be served" as Ukraine fights "by faith in God, liberty, and complete liberation." The clip questions the meaning and notes Zelensky's Congress visit to seek funding; Turning Point Action Conference reports "95% said no more money to Ukraine."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've been trying to warn you about funding this Ukrainian war effort that you're not funding the best. This is not what the media has been telling you. It's not a joke. This is the official spokesperson. And again, the video was made in English because the video was not directed towards the Kremlin. It was directed towards us. Zelensky and his pack of mobsters, they are blaming Bannon, Tucker, Charlie Kirkshow, Jack Posobic for asking questions and moving the American people away from just outright funding this entire thing, and they're very angry about it. And of course, the criticism is, well, Charlie, you're a Putin puppet. No. I'm an American patriot, Couldn't care less about Putin. Couldn't care less about Zelensky. I care about America, but I'm gonna play this piece of tape again. It's not a joke. It's not Monty Python. It's not SNL. This is a trans person who's an American born in English. Again, this is an official broadcast of the Ukrainian military in English. That does not happen unless they're trying to get the West's attention. And this person is obviously mentally deranged but trans, so that's what you get. People who are trans have deep seated mental problems. That's the way it is. And yet we put a deep seated mental problem person in charge of the Ukrainian defense forces underwritten by the US Treasury to then go threaten American broadcasters, American speech. Listen carefully to this. Now with this lead up again, and again, the timing is not by mistake. Zelensky is coming to Congress to try to get more money. Okay? He's the gangster is coming back to extort more American politicians to try to get us further into a no win war, a no win quagmire. Zelensky saw what we did at the Turning Point Action Conference. You better believe it. At the Turning Point Action Conference, we polled all of our attendees, thousands and thousands attendees, 95% said no more money to Ukraine. You better believe that somebody printed this out and they looked at it and they said, oh, this is not good. So then they deploy the person that they know would get our attention because if they just deployed some random, you know, overweight Ukrainian mobster, no, they had they they used the trans person because they knew that that would just have an internet virality wrinkle to it. And the intensity and the venom and the nastiness that this person speaks with, you just you just can't stop looking at it. It is worthy of repeating, and I'll play another clip from it in a second. So let's just repeat. This is in English for a reason directed at Westerners of a an American born person who is now the head of the Ukrainian Defense Force spokesperson saying that we are going to hunt down, murder anyone who is a Russian propagandist. And in fact, they say that there is a hit, an assassination one could interpret. I'm not saying that's the case, but there might be an assassination that is imminent against your favorite Kremlin propagandist. Are they gonna go murder or try to murder Steve Bannon or Tucker Carlson or myself or any one of these people in the next week? You could imply that. Again, none of us are Putin puppets or Russian propagandists, but the New York Times calls us that. Twitter calls us that, so they put on this false label, Trump they call that, and then the person who is funded by the US Treasury says we're gonna come murder you, not an exaggeration, listen carefully, play cut one seventeen. Speaker 1: Russia hates the truth that their obsessive focus on a Ukrainian volunteer is simply allowing the light of the Ukrainian nation's honesty to shine brightly. Next week, the teeth of the Russian devils will gnash ever harder, and their rabid mouths will foam an uncontrollable frenzy as the world will see a favorite Kremlin propagandist pay for their crimes. And this puppet of Putin is only the first. Russia's war criminal propagandists will all be hunted down, and justice will be served as we in Ukraine are led on this mission by faith in God, liberty, and complete liberation. Okay. We demand Speaker 0: lawmakers get what the heck does that mean? We will hunt them down. Does that mean you're gonna go spend go send a bunch of Ukrainian secret agents to Denver, Colorado and start murdering podcast hosts? What does that mean?
Saved - September 14, 2025 at 4:26 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

https://t.co/vPQNjn1NjX

Saved - September 13, 2025 at 7:18 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

You can tell a lot about a person by how they react when someone dies.

Saved - September 13, 2025 at 5:41 AM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Mrs. Erika Kirk Addresses The Nation After Her Husband’s Assassination @TPUSA @MrsErikaKirk https://t.co/55Gvxtbc7G

Video Transcript AI Summary
Erica Kirk says, "I wanna thank the local, state, and federal law enforcement who worked tirelessly to capture my husband's assassin so that he can be brought to justice." She also thanks the officers who have protected our Turning Point USA family these past two days, and the staffers of Charlie Kirk Show. She notes the millions who have shown love, and that Charlie loved life, America, nature, the Cubs, and the Oregon Ducks, and most of all his children and wife. Favorite Bible verse: "Ephesians five verse 25." "The evildoers responsible for my husband's assassination have no idea what they have done." She proclaims: "The movement my husband built will not die," and promises campus tours, America Fest in Phoenix this December will go on, and that the radio and podcast show will continue. "Go to tpusa.com" and "Making heaven crowded."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jesus. Speaker 1: Good evening. My name is Erica Kirk. Charlie Kirk is my husband. I first wanna thank the local, state, and federal law enforce enforcement who worked tirelessly to capture my husband's assassin so that he can be brought to justice. I wanna thank the first responders who struggled heroically heroically to save Charles' life and the police who acted bravely to make sure that there were no other victims on that terrible afternoon. I wanna thank the officers who have protected our Turning Point USA family these past two days, and I wanna thank the Turning Point USA board, the COO, Justin Streiff, and my husband's chief of staff, the amazing Mikey McCoy, for all their work in these terrible days to be the stability for our family and for the wider Turning Point USA family as well. My heart is with every one of my husband's employees who lost a friend and a mentor. I wanna thank the staffers of this his amazing Charlie Kirk show who helped him broadcast from this studio, this Speaker 0: this chair. Every day he loved it. He loved what he did. Speaker 1: I wanna thank the millions of people who have shown their love for Charlie here in Phoenix, across America, and worldwide. I wanna thank my husband's dear friend, vice president Vance, and his phenomenal wife, Usha, for their love and support. You guys honored my husband so well bringing him home. Speaker 0: You both are tremendous. Speaker 1: I wanna thank President Trump and his incredible family for the same. Mister president, my husband loved you, Speaker 0: And he knew that you loved him too. He did. Your friendship was amazing. You supported him so well as did he for you. Speaker 1: Two days ago, my husband, Charlie, went to see the face of his savior and his god. Charlie always said that when he was gone, he he wanted to be remembered Speaker 0: for his courage and for his faith. Speaker 1: And one of the final conversations that he had on this earth, my husband witnessed for his Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. Now and for all eternity, he will stand at his Savior's side wearing the glorious crown of a martyr. Speaker 0: Charlie loved loved life. Speaker 1: He loved his life. He loved America. He loved nature which helped him always bring him closer to God. He loved the Chicago Cubs and my goodness did he love the Oregon Ducks. Want me to say go Ducks so I have to since they play on Saturday, so go Ducks. But most of all, Charlie loved his children Speaker 0: and he loved me Speaker 1: with all of his heart and I knew that. Speaker 0: Every day I knew that. He made sure I knew that every day. Speaker 1: Every day he would ask me how can I serve you better? How can I be a better husband? How can Speaker 0: I be a better father? Every day. Every day. Such a good man. He still is a good man. Speaker 1: He was the perfect father. He was the perfect husband. Charlie always believed that God's designed for marriage in the family was absolutely amazing and it is. It is it and it was the greatest joy of his life. And over and over, he would tell all these young people to come and find their future spouse, become wives and husbands and parents and the reason why is because he wanted you all to experience what he had and still has. He wanted everyone to bring heaven into this earth through love and joy that comes from raising a family. It's beautiful. Charlie always said that if he ever ran for office, I know a lot of you asked if he ever was going to, but privately he told me if he ever did run for office that his top priority would be to revive the American family. That Speaker 0: was his priority. Speaker 1: One of Charlie's favorite Bible verses was Ephesians five verse 25. Husbands, love your wives Speaker 0: as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her. Speaker 1: My husband laid down his life for me, for our nation, for our children. He showed the ultimate and true covenantal love. I will never ever have the words to describe the loss that I feel in my heart. I honestly have no idea what any of this means. Speaker 0: I know that God does, but I don't. But Charlie, baby, I know you do too. I know you do. So does our Lord. Speaker 1: And our world is filled with evil, But our God, Speaker 0: you guys, our God is so good. Speaker 1: So incredibly good. And we know that for those who love God, all things work together for good. For those who are called according to his purpose. Already I have seen the worldwide outpouring of love for my husband. I've heard the testimonies from people my husband inspired to get married, to start families, to seek out a relationship with God. It's the most important most important one of all. The evildoers responsible for my husband's assassination have no idea what they have done. They killed Charlie because he preached a message of patriotism, faith, and of God's merciful love. They should all know this. If you thought that my husband's mission was powerful before, you have no idea. You have no idea what you just have unleashed across this entire country In this world, you have no idea. You have no idea the fire that you have ignited within this wife. The cries of this widow will echo around the world like a battle cry. To everyone listening tonight across America, the movement my husband built will not die. It won't. I refuse to let that happen. It will not die. All of us will refuse to let that happen. No one will ever forget my husband's name, and I will make sure of it. It will become stronger, bolder, louder, and greater than ever. My husband's mission will not end, not even for a moment. And one of Charlie's greatest talents was his ability, this phenomenal ability to choose great people to follow him. He could always find the ones who could handle any setback. And it's almost like he knew he just he could see it in you even when you couldn't see it in yourself, he just knew. He knew you could handle it. You thought you only had 5% left and he knew you had 15. He knew you were ready to go that extra mile even when you didn't. He always challenged people around him to work harder and to be better. He never gave up, and I love knowing that one of his of his mottos was never surrender. So I wanna tell you that that we'll never surrender. We never will ever. Ever. Our campus tour this fall will continue. There will be even more tours in the years to come. America Fest here in Phoenix this December will go on. It will be greater than ever. The radio and podcast show that he was so proud of Speaker 0: will go on. Speaker 1: And in a world filled with chaos, doubt, and uncertainty, my husband's voice will remain, and it will ring out louder and more clearly than ever and his wisdom will endure. My favorite my favorite too, but my husband's favorite word in the English language was earn. He would call all of you to be people of action who earn the future America deserves. So to all of the young people who felt inspired by my husband's faith in hard work, all of you already know what Charlie would want you to do. You know. You know. If you're in high school or if you're in college, go find your local Turning Point USA chapter. Join it. Stay involved. He wants you to make a difference and you can. You can. The movement's not going anywhere and it will only grow stronger when you join it. There isn't a chapter, you can't find one then start one. There is no excuse. You can start one and as my husband used to say in this room every single day if you want to get involved, the best way you can do that is going to tpusa.com. That's what he would say every day from this chair. Every single day. I watched his show every day and he would always say if you want to get involved, go to tpusa.com. If you're a pastor join our movement at tpusafaith And if you're a parent, I highly recommend that you come to America Fest in December. Sign up right now for that because we would love to Speaker 0: see you. I would love to see you. Charlie would. He'll be there. He'll be there in spirit. Speaker 1: Bring your kids, bring your family. But most important of all, if you aren't a member of a church, I beg you to join one, a Bible believing church. Our battle is not simply a political one above all, is spiritual. It is spiritual. The spiritual warfare is palpable. Charlie loved his Savior with all of his heart and he wanted every one of you to know him too. He wanted everyone to know that if they confess if they confess the Lord Jesus Christ who rose from the dead, then they will be saved. Hear me when I say this, nobody is ever too young to know the gospel. Nobody. Nobody is ever too young to get involved with saving this beautiful country. This country my husband loved and still loves. And nobody is ever too old either. There's no age limit. I know my husband is still here. He's watching over us. I don't remember the last time I slept. I couldn't sleep last night and Speaker 0: Charlie baby. Speaker 1: Charlie, I promise I will never let your legacy die, baby. I won't. I I promise I'll make Turning Point USA the biggest thing that this nation has ever seen. Speaker 0: I promise. Charlie, I love you. I love you, baby. Speaker 1: Rest in the arms of our Lord as he blankets you with the words I know your heart always strives to hear. Well done, my good and faithful servant. When I got home last night, Gigi, our daughter just ran into our my arms. Speaker 0: And I talked to her and she said, mommy, I missed you. I said, I missed you too, baby. She goes, where's daddy? What do you tell a three year old? She's three. Speaker 1: I said, baby, daddy loves you so much. Don't you worry. He's on a he's on a work trip with Jesus so he can afford your blueberry budget. And my goodness, am I so humbled to witness Charlie you alongside Jesus right now doing what you always wanna do, baby. Making heaven crowded. Right? That's what it's all about. Making heaven crowded. Speaker 0: I can't wait to see you again one day. Speaker 1: Thank you all again who love my husband, who supported him, who wrote him an email every single day during his radio show. He read all Speaker 0: of them. All of them. Speaker 1: God bless you all, and may God bless America.
Saved - September 11, 2025 at 5:31 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

At this rate I might watch SNL again. The culture is shifting. This is hilarious and promising. First time in 15 years I’ve seen the LGBT third rail be mocked on TV WATCH https://t.co/WEOdR3iTER

Video Transcript AI Summary
Oh my gosh. Whose baby is that? Excuse me? It's ours. Okay. I'm sorry, but gay gay people can't have a baby? Yeah. But, like, where did it come from? We didn't pull it out of your vagina, if that's what you're asking. People think they can ask gay people anything. It's not okay. I loaned you $10,000. I think we're just wondering who the mother is. Well, between the two of us, I'm more emotional and I like shopping, so me, I think. Yeah. But I mean, I have long hair and he is an alcoholic. So I guess it's like two moms, I guess. What do you want us to say? That we stole her? Did you? Well, we like to think of it as she stole us. English is my eighth language and even I know what that expression means.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh my gosh. Whose baby is that? Speaker 1: Excuse me? It's ours. Speaker 0: Wait. But, how? Speaker 2: Okay. I'm sorry, but gay gay people can't have a baby? Speaker 0: Yeah. But, like, where did it come from? Speaker 1: Excuse me? Excuse me? Wow. Speaker 2: You are not allowed to talk like that. Speaker 1: That is so invasive. Speaker 0: Okay. But, like, we were with you last night and you did not have a baby. Speaker 3: Yeah, and you guys said that after dinner you were going to go to a rave called Bulge Dungeon and now today you have a baby. Speaker 0: What we're asking is how did this happen? Speaker 1: Okay. I'm sorry. Why is it when it's us, an interrogation? I don't ask you why you're poor. Speaker 0: I loaned you $10,000. Speaker 4: I I think we're just wondering who the mother is. Speaker 1: Hey. Well, between the two of us, I'm more emotional and I like shopping, so me, Speaker 3: I think. Speaker 2: Yeah. But I mean, I have long hair and he is an alcoholic. So I guess it's like two Speaker 3: moms, I guess. Yeah. Speaker 0: Guys, how did you get this baby? Speaker 1: Okay. We didn't pull it out of your vagina, if that's what you're asking. Speaker 2: Yeah. People think they can ask gay people anything. It's not okay. Speaker 1: Yeah. We don't ask you guys whose butt you use for anal. Speaker 4: Okay. I mean, I guess what's confusing us is you've never mentioned that you were having a baby, so this feels pretty sudden. Speaker 2: Yeah. Because it wasn't planned. Sometimes it's an accident. Speaker 0: How does a gay couple have a baby by accident? Speaker 1: What do you want us to say? That we stole her? Speaker 0: Did you? Speaker 2: Well, we like to think of it as she stole us. Speaker 3: So does that mean yes? Speaker 1: Why are you confused? English is my eighth language and even I know what that expression means. Speaker 0: What other languages do you speak? Speaker 1: You can't ask me that. Wow. The transphobia is real. What? Speaker 0: I'm so sorry. Is one of you a trans man? No. Speaker 2: No. No. No. No. You cannot just ask that girl. But no. God, they should come up with a word for when people have a phobia towards homos. Speaker 3: Do you mean homophobia? Speaker 1: I literally speak eight languages and I've never heard that word. Speaker 4: Okay. You need to tell us which eight. Speaker 1: English, French, AP French, Navi, Simlish, Blackish, Grownish, and Singing. Speaker 3: Where is your baby from? Us. Speaker 0: But how did you get it? Speaker 1: It? You mean she, they, until he tells us otherwise.
Saved - September 10, 2025 at 10:38 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

If we want things to change, it's 100% necessary to politicize the senseless murder of Iryna Zarutska because it was politics that allowed a savage monster with 14 priors to be free on the streets to kill her. https://t.co/ZP7cFNDtvx

Video Transcript AI Summary
"On August 22, Irina Zorutsko was stabbed to death on the rail system in Charlotte, North Carolina by a savage career criminal." "This was one of the coldest, most senseless murders I've ever seen." "She had no interaction with this guy whatsoever." "She was sitting on her own business, and he just takes out knife and just decides to stab her." "Based on the information evidence we have, the attacker did say, I got that white girl." "The attacker racialized it in his own telling of this situation." "We saw this in George Floyd, and yet, for whatever reason, the situation has not garnered even a fraction of that kind of outrage or backlash."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On August 22, Irina Zorutsko was stabbed to death on the rail system in Charlotte, North Carolina by a savage career criminal. Speaker 1: Her life story, I think, will be told, both in United States and Ukraine for years to come. What do you think the importance of this story is most fundamentally? This was one of the coldest, most senseless murders I've ever seen. She had no interaction with this guy whatsoever. She was sitting on her own business, and he just takes out knife and just decides to stab her. I do say this with some form of just heaviness. I don't like politicizing situations like this, but it just necessitates it because there are so many dynamics at play here. Based on the information evidence we have, the attacker did say, I got that white girl. The attacker racialized it in his own telling of this situation. And we all know this. Any honest observer of your program knows this, including Van Jones even knows this deep down, which is that, of course, if a random white person on a subway took out a knife and stabbed a black girl senselessly to death, there would be massive media coverage. There would be policy changes. There'd be people having to apologize for this. We saw this in George Floyd, and yet, for whatever reason, the situation has not garnered even a fraction of that kind of outrage or backlash.
Saved - September 10, 2025 at 9:49 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

If we want things to change, it's 100% necessary to politicize the senseless murder of Iryna Zarutska because it was politics that allowed a savage monster with 14 priors to be free on the streets to kill her. https://t.co/ZP7cFNDtvx

Video Transcript AI Summary
"On August 22, Irina Zorutsko was stabbed to death on the rail system in Charlotte, North Carolina by a savage career criminal." "This was one of the coldest, most senseless murders I've ever seen." "She had no interaction with this guy whatsoever. She was sitting on her own business, and he just takes out knife and just decides to stab her." "Based on the information evidence we have, the attacker did say, I got that white girl." "The attacker racialized it in his own telling of this situation." "If a random white person on a subway took out a knife and stabbed a black girl senselessly to death, there would be massive media coverage. There would be policy changes. We saw this in George Floyd, and yet, for whatever reason, the situation has not garnered even a fraction of that kind of outrage or backlash."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On August 22, Irina Zorutsko was stabbed to death on the rail system in Charlotte, North Carolina by a savage career criminal. Speaker 1: Her life story, I think, will be told, both in United States and Ukraine for years to come. What do you think the importance of this story is most fundamentally? This was one of the coldest, most senseless murders I've ever seen. She had no interaction with this guy whatsoever. She was sitting on her own business, and he just takes out knife and just decides to stab her. I do say this with some form of just heaviness. I don't like politicizing situations like this, but it just necessitates it because there are so many dynamics at play here. Based on the information evidence we have, the attacker did say, I got that white girl. The attacker racialized it in his own telling of this situation. And we all know this. Any honest observer of your program knows this, including Van Jones even knows this deep down, which is that, of course, if a random white person on a subway took out a knife and stabbed a black girl senselessly to death, there would be massive media coverage. There would be policy changes. There'd be people having to apologize for this. We saw this in George Floyd, and yet, for whatever reason, the situation has not garnered even a fraction of that kind of outrage or backlash.
Saved - September 10, 2025 at 9:36 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Did I just get shot by an AR-15? Feels like it.

Saved - September 10, 2025 at 9:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A man in Colorado, charged with attempted murder after assaulting a random victim, has been deemed "not competent to stand trial." Due to the state mental hospital being full, he has been released instead of being held accountable. I express frustration that Colorado judges allow violent individuals to remain free, and I believe lawmakers are neglecting to address the loopholes that enable this situation. I feel that the focus is misplaced, prioritizing the rights of criminals over the safety of innocent people.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

A man in Colorado assaulted and nearly killed a random person while he was leaving a bar, and was charged with attempted murder. He's been accused of additional crimes including burglary and menacing with a weapon. But Colorado's court system has ruled he is "not competent to stand trial," and since the state mental hospital is currently full, he's simply been released back into the wild, where he will eventually attack and kill some innocent person (and then, presumably, will suddenly be "competent" for trial). This isn't some accident or natural disaster. This is a choice. Colorado judges are choosing to let violent lunatics roam free rather than be locked up like they deserve, and Colorado lawmakers are refusing to close the loopholes that let this happen. Democrats care more about depraved criminals and predators than about innocent people. https://www.9news.com/article/news/crime/man-released-from-jail-competency-law/73-77ceee3f-1ce7-40d3-85af-e22e72f1329a

@unlimited_ls - Unlimited L's

🚨BREAKING: Colorado Sheriff admits he was forced to release a ‘very dangerous’ inmate from jail because of state law that requires criminals found incompetent to stand trial to be released 'He is a very dangerous person, and his actions, from what we can tell, were unprovoked.' Weld County Sheriff Steve Reams warned the public about a potentially dangerous inmate released on Monday 'Quite honestly, without some legislative actions, I don't know how you address this concern.' Debisa Ephraim, 21, was released after being found incompetent to stand trial in two of his cases Ephraim had been facing charges including attempted second-degree murder, assault, engaging in a riot, menacing, and burglary Officials described him as a “potential danger to the community.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Weld County Sheriff Steve Reams warns of a man he released from jail because the suspect was ruled incompetent to stand trial. The individual is Debisa Efraim, a 21 year old who Ream says is seen in videos fighting Northern Coloradans. "He's a very dangerous person and his actions from what we can tell were unprovoked." Reams questions why he walked free without ever seeing a jury, attributing it to House Bill ten thirty four signed into law last year by Governor Jared Polis. The law says those found incompetent to stand trials should be sent to mental health care instead of incarceration, but that is contingent on the suspect qualifying for that care, which Efrain did not. He says the Aurora case with Solomon Galligan illustrates the issue and urges legislative changes. He notes he walked free from charges like attempted murder after five months in custody.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a very violent crime and how rapidly this person has accumulated contacts with law enforcement. It's concerning. Speaker 1: Weld County Sheriff Steve Reams is warning his residence of a man he released from jail, not by his own choosing, but because the suspect was ruled incompetent to stand trial. Speaker 0: And with that ruling, we're forced to release that individual. Speaker 1: That individual is Debisa Efraim, a 21 year old who Ream says is seen in these videos fighting Northern Coloradans. The videos, too graphic to be shown in full show men being knocked unconscious and then continuously punched in the face while lying on the ground. Speaker 0: He's a very dangerous person and his actions from what we can tell were unprovoked. Speaker 1: So why did he walk free without ever seeing a jury? Ream says it's the result of House Bill ten thirty four signed into law last year by Governor Jared Polis. The law at its core said those found incompetent to stand trials should be sent to mental health care instead of incarceration, but that is contingent on the suspect qualifying for that care, which Efrain did not. Ream says so Monday morning he walked free from charges like attempted murder and the cell that he lived in for the last five months. Speaker 0: This or the case that happened in Aurora with Solomon Galligan. Those both are very giant highlights to the mistake that was made. These it needs to be corrected. Someone's gonna get hurt and someone's gonna get hurt bad. All I can do at this point is make them aware that this person is out and about and pray that, you know, he doesn't reenter those those criminal actions. But quite honestly, without some legislative changes, I don't know how you address this this concern.
Saved - September 10, 2025 at 9:31 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Official Black Lives Matter account justifying the murder of Iryna Zarutska

@Rightanglenews - Right Angle News Network

BREAKING - The official black lives matter account has posted a video stating that black people “have a right to violence” amid mass outrage over the slaying of Iryna Zarutska at the hands of a black male in Charlotte, North Carolina. https://t.co/jhnuArvrXd

Video Transcript AI Summary
Have a right to violence. All oppressed people have a right to violence. It's like the right to pee. You gotta have the right place. You gotta have the right time. You gotta have the appropriate situation, and I'm absolutely convinced that this is it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have a right to violence. All oppressed people have a right to violence. And I'm gonna tell you something. It's like the right to pee. You gotta have the right place. You gotta have the right time. You gotta have the appropriate situation, and I'm absolutely convinced that this is it.
Saved - September 10, 2025 at 7:34 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

CNN is mad that I posted about the murder of Iryna Zarutska by a black man with a rap sheet a mile long who was free despite 14 prior arrests. MSM should just apologize for refusing to report on this story and stop blaming us for doing their jobs. https://t.co/t9EzVxcI0c

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Most murders in The US never become national news." "This one's garnered attention for a couple of reasons." "First and foremost, the recent release of that gruesome video." "Second, the energy from pro Trump activists." "They picked up on this video from local news and ran with it." "In this case, it is Trump aligned influencers who are posting up a storm about this case on social media." "Over the weekend, Elon Musk, Charlie Kirk, other Trump figures succeeded in making this senseless death a symbol of big city crime." "We heard president Trump asked about it yesterday when he was heading home from New York City." "He didn't seem to know much about it." "He said he would get briefed." "And then today, Trump did know all about it." "That's exactly what has happened here."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most murders in The US never become national news. This one's garnered attention for a couple of reasons. Number one, first and foremost, the recent release of that gruesome video. Second, the energy from pro Trump activists. They picked up on this video from local news and ran with it. It's a little bit like the times when civil rights groups have raised attention about police involved shootings. In this case, it is Trump aligned influencers who are posting up a storm about this case on social media. Really, over the weekend, Elon Musk, Charlie Kirk, other Trump figures succeeded in making this senseless death a symbol of big city crime. We heard president Trump asked about it yesterday when he was heading home from New York City. He didn't seem to know much about it. He said he would get briefed. And then today, Trump did know all about it. That's exactly what has happened here. This story has trickled up from so from local news to social media and now to the president's attention. And it's being used, as you said, Brianna, as a political symbol with, MAGA media calling for more forceful punishments and more I have to say some of the replies to Musk, some of the comments around this story are baldly racist, stoking fear of African Americans because this man attacked a white woman. The open racism on sites like x today, it's eye popping. But there are also legitimate questions about this so called career criminal, someone who had been a repeat offender. And those questions, I hope they're not lost amid all of the cesspool kind of comments on social media.
Saved - September 10, 2025 at 7:11 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Right now, millions of people are finding out you can become a magistrate judge in many states WITHOUT being a licensed lawyer — Teresa Stokes never passed the bar exam — fully empowered to let repeat criminal offenders roam the streets to murder innocents. Utter lunacy. https://t.co/XjeM3FO3s7

Saved - September 10, 2025 at 4:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The left claims conservatives are "racializing" Iryna Zarutska's death while they capitalize "Black" but not "white." They've racialized everything in America for years. They're not upset about discussions on race; they're frustrated that their white guilt narrative isn't effective anymore. Enough.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

The left accuses conservatives of "racializing" the death of Iryna Zarutska, while literally making sure to capitalize the word "Black" while not capitalizing the other, inferior color of white. They are a pack of liars who have racialized quite literally everything in America since at least 2014, but really since long before that. They're not mad we're talking about race, they're just mad their white guilt spell is no longer working. Enough. (H/T @DougMackeyCase)

Saved - September 9, 2025 at 10:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
It happened again. A white woman, Julie Gard Schnuelle, was brutally murdered while walking her dog in Auburn by Harold Rashad Dabney III, a suspect with a criminal history. He allegedly stabbed her and stole her truck before being apprehended the next day, with her dog remaining by her side until her body was found. I can't help but notice that if the races were reversed, the reaction would be immediate and intense, yet this incident seems to be receiving little attention.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

🚨It happened again. Another white woman was "hacked to death" over the weekend for no apparent reason, by a suspect who is black with multiple prior arrests including illegal posession of a sawed-off shotgun and removing serial numbers from firearms in Virginia. Julie Gard Schnuelle, a former veteranary professor, had taken her dog for a walk in Auburn when the suspect, Harold Rashad Dabney III, allegedly murdered her by stabbing and stole her truck before being arrested the next day. Her dog stayed by her side until her body was discovered. Once again, if the races were reversed, the outcry would be instantaneous and apocalyptic, and yet you're probably just hearing about this now.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Police have arrested Harold Rashad Dabney III from Montgomery and charged him with two counts of capital murder in connection to the death of doctor Chanelli at Kissell Park. Police say they received a call about a suspicious person around 08:45AM Sunday on Beehive Road and labeled Dabney the suspect in the homicide. Chanelli's wounds appear to be consistent with a sharp force trauma, meaning caused by a knife or other sharp objects. Chanelli's red Ford F-150 that was taken from Hustle Park on Saturday was found along Lee Road 177 or Wire Road in Auburn, and abandoned on Wire Road Sunday afternoon. Kiesel Park is still closed and remains a crime scene with tape at the gate, and will remain closed through the weekend. Police say this is all the information they have right now; updates will be provided on air and online at wtvm.com.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Auburn police have made an arrest in the death of our former Auburn professor, doctor Julie Chenelli. This, update coming just about five minutes ago in a press release. Auburn police say they have arrested, Harold Rashad Dabney the third from Montgomery and have charged him with two counts of capital murder in connection to the death of doctor Chanelli at Kissel Park. Now police say they received a call about a suspicious person on around 08:45AM on Sunday morning on Beehive Road, and Auburn police say through contact with Dabney, they have made the observation and through further investigation have labeled Dabney the suspect in the in the homicide involving the the involving doctor Chanelli. Now according to Lee County coroner Daniel Sexton, Chanelli's wounds appear to be consistent with a sharp force trauma, meaning caused by a knife or other sharp objects. And also, Auburn police say that the, Chanelis red Ford f one fifty that was taken from Hustle Park on Saturday was found along Lee Road 177 or Wire Road in Auburn. And Auburn and Auburn police have taken, that, that truck, and and it was found abandoned again on Wire Road in Auburn on Sunday afternoon. Now Kiesl Park is still closed and remains a crime scene with crime scene state tape still up at the gate, and Auburn police say it will remain closed through the weekend. I've spoken to several people here in Auburn, along Wire Road, along Chadwick Lane where Kiesel Park is, and, everyone is saying the same thing that it's very sad, and it comes as a shock, to hear that it was, so close to their homes on Chadwick Lane and also happening in Auburn. I spoke to several people that were at Auburn vet school where doctor Chanelli was a professor until 2021, and they say that she was a very highly regarded professor, and they were extremely sad to hear about this tragedy at Kissel Park. But Auburn police say that this is all the information they have right now. But if any info information is released by Auburn police, we'll be sure to keep you updated on air and online at wtvm.com. Live in Auburn, I'm Justin Brown for WTVM News Leader nine.
Saved - August 17, 2025 at 5:46 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Sec. Rubio just torched Margaret Brennan after she says the Europeans are coming to babysit Trump so he doesn’t “bully” Zelenskyy into a peace deal. “That’s not true…we invited them!” Watching these people salivate for more war is truly disgusting. https://t.co/paHOIZfk2C

Video Transcript AI Summary
European leaders are not coming to rescue Zelensky from bullying; they are coming "because we've been working with the Europeans" and "the president invited them to come." The visit is not a stunt; there have been more meetings with Zelensky than with Putin, including "one meeting with Putin and, like, a dozen meetings with Zelensky." The White House says Zelensky told European leaders last week he wanted a cease-fire and that he would "walk out in two minutes" if Putin didn't agree; he spent three hours with Putin but "did not get one." The aim is "a peace agreement to end this war" and there was "enough progress" to move to the next phase. If peace isn't possible, "sanctions" are on the table, but "if he did this now, the moment the president puts those additional sanctions, that's the end of the talks." It will require concessions from both sides.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know there is concern from the Europeans that president Zelensky is going to be bullied into signing something away. That's why you have these European leaders coming as backup tomorrow. Can you No. Speaker 1: It is. That's not why they're coming us back. That's not true. No. But that's not why why would that's not true. They're not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelenskyy from being bullied. They're not February. Coming Oh, they're they're coming Speaker 0: here tomorrow. Television cameras where president Zelenskyy Speaker 1: Do you know how many meetings you've had since then? Speaker 0: Oh, no. I I know. And I was just up in I the last had bunch of meetings with Vladimir Putin where a red carpet rolls rolls out. Speaker 1: But with Zelensky, we've had more meetings. We've had we've had we've had one meeting with Putin and, like, a dozen meetings with Zelensky. So that but that's not true. They're not coming here tomorrow to keep Zelenskyy from being bullied. They're coming here tomorrow because we've been working with the Europeans. We talked to them last week. There were meetings in The UK over the follow the previous weekend. Speaker 0: And they said president Trump's gonna demand a cease fire. Speaker 1: As early as Thursday. And but you said that they're coming here tomorrow to keep Zelenskyy from being bullied. They're not coming here tomorrow. Oh, this is such a stupid media narrative that they're coming here tomorrow because the Trump is gonna bully Zelenskyy into a bad deal. We've been working with these people for weeks for weeks on this stuff. They're coming here tomorrow because they chose to come here tomorrow. We invited them to come. We invited them to come. The president invited them to come. Speaker 0: But the president told those European leaders last week that he wanted to cease fire. The president went on television, said he would walk out of the meeting if Vladimir Putin didn't agree with one. He said there would be severe consequences if he didn't agree to one. He said he'd walk out in two minutes. He spent three hours talking to Vladimir Putin, and he did not get one. So there's Speaker 1: some exceptions. Something things happened during that meeting. Well, because, obviously, things look. Our goal here is not to stage some production for the world to say, oh, how dramatic you walked out. Our goal here is to have a peace agreement to end this war. Okay? And, obviously, we felt, and I agreed, that there was enough progress, not a lot of progress, but enough progress made in those talks to allow us to move to the next phase. If not, we wouldn't be having Zelensky flying all the way over here. We wouldn't be having all the Europeans coming all the way over here. Now understand and take with a grain of salt, I'm not saying we're on the verge of a peace deal, but I am saying that we saw movement, enough movement to justify a follow-up meeting with Zelensky and the Europeans, enough movement for us to dedicate even more time to this. You talk about the sanctions. Look. At the end of the day, if peace is not gonna be possible here and this is just gonna continue on as a war, people will continue to die by the thousands. The president has that option to then come in and impose new sanctions. But if he did this now, the moment the president puts those additional sanctions, that's the end of the talks. You've basically locked in at least another year to year and a half of war and death We may unfortunately wind up there, but we don't wanna wind up there. We wanna wind up with a peace deal that ends this war so Ukraine can go on with the rest of their lives and rebuild their country and be assured that this is never gonna happen again. That's the goal here. We're gonna do everything possible to make that happen if it's doable. It will require both sides to make concessions. It will require both sides to get things they're asking for. That's how these deals are made, whether we like it or not.
Saved - August 15, 2025 at 10:48 AM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

ICE should immediately deport her family members illegally residing in the US. No one is above the law. Right, Democrats?

@theblaze - TheBlaze

Democrat Rep. Delia Ramirez, who recently said she was more loyal to Guatemala than America, claims that "half" of her family residing in the United States is still "undocumented": https://t.co/5IPpwSKnsS

Saved - August 15, 2025 at 10:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe the recent criminal case in Nebraska involving five hotel operators of Indian origin. They've been arrested for exploiting 10 minors and 17 adults as illegal labor, while also facilitating drug and sex trafficking. What's even more shocking is the alleged scam where they faked a robbery at one hotel to help the "victims" obtain free US visas to stay in the country. This ridiculous visa system needs to be eliminated immediately by Congress; it's an insane mistake that keeps resurfacing.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

This criminal case in Nebraska is unbelievable. Five hotel operators, all of Indian origin, were just arrested for using 10 minors and 17 adults as illegal labor, while also enabling both drug and sex trafficking. But one of the most appalling parts is a scam that has popped up again and again in the news: Along with everything else, the alleged perpetrators are accused of faking a robbery at one of the hotels, so that the "victims" could receive a free US visa allowing them to stay in the United States. Why does this ridiculous visa continue to exist? Congress should eliminate it immediately as the insane mistake that it is.

@Breaking911 - Breaking911

BREAKING: DOJ breaks up human trafficking ring at several Nebraska hotels 10 children & 17 adults were rescued https://t.co/S7BLLLPT8z

Saved - August 10, 2025 at 5:54 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

.@JDVance on the Russia hoax: “I absolutely want to see indictments, Maria.” 🔥🔥 https://t.co/LI5lcBiktt

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're still waiting for accountability on the whole Russia collusion made up story. Now that DNI, Kelsey Gabbard has released all of those classified documents, we're actually seeing who was behind all of this. Do you wanna see indictments? I absolutely wanna see indictments. Tulsi and Cash Patel reveal aggressive violations of the law: "What they basically did is they defrauded the American people in order to take Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign talking points and turn them into intelligence... by defrauding the American people, defrauding the intelligence agencies, lying about what the intel said, they would take something that supported a Hillary Clinton campaign talking point, and they would overemphasize it and exaggerate it." They "took anything that actually contradicted that narrative and they buried it deep" and "laundered Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign talking points through the American intelligence services." That's "a violation of the people's trust" and "I absolutely think they broke the law." You'll see a lot of people get indicted. What do you want our intelligence community to be doing? Catching bad guys, not laundering Hillary Clinton's campaign talking points into the American media and giving them this air of legitimacy. It is sick and it's disgusting. It hurt the intelligence community. It hurt the American people, and it hurt the first Trump administration. We've gotta have consequences for it or we're just gonna see the same play repeated again and after again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Meanwhile, we're still waiting for accountability on the whole Russia collusion made up story. Yes. Now that DNI, Kelsey Gabbard has released all of those classified documents, we're actually seeing who was behind all of this. Do you wanna see indictments? Speaker 1: I absolutely wanna see indictments, Maria. Look, of course, you gotta have the law follow the facts here. You don't just indict people to indict people. You indict people because they broke the law. But if you look at what Tulsi and Cash Patel have revealed in the last couple of weeks, I don't know how anybody can look at that and say that there wasn't aggressive violations of the law. What they basically did is they defrauded the American people in order to take Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign talking points and turn them into intelligence by defrauding the American people, defrauding the intelligence agencies, lying about what the intel said, they would take something that that that supported a Hillary Clinton campaign talking point, and they would overemphasize it and exaggerate it. They took anything that actually contradicted that narrative and they buried it deep. And through that, they actually laundered Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign talking points through the American intelligence services. That's a violation of the people's trust. That's a violation of what our intelligence services should be doing, and I absolutely think they broke the law. You're gonna see a lot of people get indicted for that. Here's the thing that should really bother the American people. What do you want our intelligence community to be doing? I want them to be catching bad guys. I want them to be making sure that terrorists aren't gonna kill innocent American civilians. I don't want them laundering Hillary Clinton's campaign talking points into the American media and giving them this air of legitimacy. It is sick and it's disgusting. It hurt the intelligence community. It hurt the American people, and it hurt the first Trump administration. We've gotta have consequences for it or we're just gonna see the same play repeated again and after again.
Saved - July 22, 2025 at 7:47 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

President Trump reacts to the Obamagate revelations made by DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "They caught President Obama absolutely cold ... They tried to rig the election and they got caught — and there should be very severe consequences for that." https://t.co/cgU6OizBiB

Saved - July 14, 2025 at 9:10 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

When asked which weapons will be sent to Ukraine via NATO partners, President Trump says "it's everything... It's all of them. It's a full compliment." https://t.co/9GTPH5IX4b

Video Transcript AI Summary
Patriot missiles and batteries are being planned for Ukraine. A full complement of Patriots will be provided. Some are expected to arrive very soon, within days. Countries that already have Patriots will swap them out and replace them with new ones. Matt will coordinate with NATO. Boris Pistorius, the German defense minister, is visiting the secretary of defense, Pete Hackett, to discuss the Patriot situation. Norway is also involved. The deal is broader than just Patriots and includes missiles and ammunition.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Will these be Patriot missiles specifically or Patriot batteries that you're planning? Speaker 1: And when you when you Everything. It's Patriots. It's all of them. It's a full complement with the batteries. Speaker 0: And when do you expect them to arrive in Ukraine, sir? Speaker 1: Well, we're gonna have some come very soon, within days, actually. Because a couple of the countries that have patriots are gonna swap over and will replace the patriots with the ones they have, and, Matt will coordinate with NATO. But so it's gonna be they're gonna start arriving very And Speaker 0: this this afternoon, Boris Pistorius, the German defense minister, is visiting Pete Hackett, the secretary of defense, and and we'll discuss also, I think, on this whole Patriot thing. Norway is involved, so that's on the Patriots, but this whole deal is also about missiles or ammunition, so it's a broader than Patriots. We have one
Saved - June 27, 2025 at 3:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered a concerning provision on page 306 of the Senate Finance text for the One Big Beautiful Bill. It allows big multinationals, particularly General Motors, to benefit from taxpayer dollars for their Chinese suppliers by grandfathering existing contracts. This could divert hundreds of millions from US taxpayers to companies linked to the Chinese Communist Party through 2030, undermining American manufacturers. I’m aware of the Republican Senators supporting this, and they need to address it quickly, or I will call them out. This cronyism has no place in our economic agenda.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Buried on page 306 of the Senate Finance text for the One Big Beautiful Bill is a carveout for big multinationals to pocket taxpayer dollars for their Chinese suppliers by grandfathering existing contracts. Big auto companies, General Motors in particular is pushing for this. This provision will send hundreds of millions of US taxpayer dollars to companies affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party through 2030, at the expense of American manufacturers that were just getting a break from anticompetitive behavior thanks to President Trump's America First trade policies. This sort of cronyism by the likes of Biden BFF Mary Barra at GM and her buddies at CATL, at American workers' expense, has no place in a MAGA economic agenda meant to put our prosperity and national security first I know the Republican Senators who are carrying the water on this. They need to fix this asap or they will be named. It’s disgusting.

Saved - June 17, 2025 at 4:10 AM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Should the US get involved in Israel’s war against Iran?

Saved - June 17, 2025 at 1:52 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
If America considers regime change in Iran, it's worth remembering our past involvement in the 1950s, where the CIA orchestrated a coup against Prime Minister Mohammed Mosaddegh. While the shah was pro-American, the long-term fallout was severe, culminating in a deep-seated animosity towards the U.S. Regime change efforts, like those in Iraq and Libya, have often led to prolonged conflicts and instability. These experiences highlight that such actions rarely yield the intended results and can lead to far worse situations, underscoring the need for war to be a last resort.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

If America does regime change in Iran, it won't be for the first time. We also did it in the 1950s. The CIA hired mobsters, paid protesters, and generously doled out bribes to facilitate a military coupe overthrowing then-prime minister Mohammed Mosaddegh. Mossadegh was, maybe, a bit pro-Soviet. His replacement, the shah, was secular and pro-American. But the long-term outcome of that coup was disastrous. When Islamic radicals toppled the shah 26 years later, they had an incandescent hatred for America. The negative consequences of 45 years of antagonism with Iran outweigh whatever good we got from the Shah a hundred times over. And that's how it's been with most of our regime change efforts. Toppling Saddam Hussein gave us a forever war and ISIS and emboldened Iran. Toppling the Taliban gave us a forever war that ended with the Taliban back in power. Toppling Libya gave us slave markets in Tripoli and a vastly worse European migrant crisis. Regime change wars almost never go the way they're expected to, and can easily make things far worse at tremendous cost. That's exactly why war should only be a last resort, when absolutely necessary. Subscribe to The Charlie Kirk Show to listen to the full episode ⬇️ bit.ly/3QHIUrC

Video Transcript AI Summary
John Bolton suggests regime change in Iran, but the U.S. has a history of interference there. In the 1940s and 50s, Britain and the Soviets deposed the Shah, and later the U.S. overthrew Prime Minister Mossadegh, who was seen as communist and hostile to American interests, despite being secular. The U.S. then reinstalled the Shah, an unpopular autocrat, making America unpopular in Iran. This led to the 1970s revolution, bringing Ayatollah Khomeini to power and creating an anti-American regime. Intervention made Iran an enemy. Regime change can lead to unforeseen consequences like civil war and refugee crises. The West should not interfere; Iran's problems today stem from past U.S. involvement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Take out the Mullahs. Knock them out. You got you got John Bolton who's getting a little excited. This is let me just tell let me translate for you right now. He writes in the Wall Street Journal, and and you guys know I'm pro Israel. I don't think I need to prove that any further. I have the scars to prove that I'm pro Israel from all the campus events. Iran's Ayatollahs are weaker than ever. Let me tell you what John Bolton is really saying here. He's basically saying that we should go for the throat and we need to execute regime change. That that is what John Bolton is saying in neo con speak in so many words. But did you know that we only have a problem in Iran at the scale and the magnitude that we currently have because we involved ourselves in regime change? America has a long history of regime change with Iran. Historically, Iran was then called Persia way back in the nineteen thirties, forties, and fifties. It was ruled by a shah, an absolute monarch. During World War two, the British and the Soviets invaded Iran because they were worried that it would ally with Hitler. They deposed the ruling shah, throwing the country into turmoil. The Shah's son took power, but then he was overthrown too. Iran main came under the rule of a prime minister who had a lot of popular support. But to be honest, he was kind of a communist. He wanted to nationalize the oil. His name was Mossadegh. He was not a great guy. He basically tried to make himself a dictator. He tilted towards the Soviet Union, and he was hostile to American economic interests. So our leaders got in their heads that they should overthrow him. So they said this guy is bad. How could anything get worse than Mossadegh? But he was largely secular. He was not Islamic. So we in our American minds said this guy is terrible. He's a communist. Take him out. What could be worse than Mossadegh? So we did. And by the way, our government lied about it for years. The CIA and m MI six assisted the Iranian military in overthrowing Mossadegh. They lied about it, and finally declassified files showed that, nope. We were involved, and we got rid of the democratically elected, somewhat communistic Mossadegh interfering with the self determination of the Iranian people. Because we said, what could be worse than this guy? Well, we reinstalled the Shah, and look, the Shah was an autocrat. He was also super sick and very weak. He was not able to really run the country, but, hey, he was anti communist and pro America, but he was not popular in his country. And since he was America's guy, that made America much more unpopular in Iran. And then in the nineteen seventies, Iran had another revolution because of us, and this is when Islam surfaced. A group of radical Islamic students launched demonstrations against the regime, and eventually, they overthrew the Shah. They recalled an exiled Islamic cleric, the infamous Ayatollah Khomeini, back from exile, and they made him the theocratic ruler because America had involved itself so aggressively in Iranian affairs before these people really hated America. And so thanks to our intervention in that country in the fifties, we made them an enemy for decades to come. This radical regime took dozens of Americans as hostages in our embassy. They sponsored terrorism around the world, and they called us the great Satan. The moral here is that we should not invade Iran, and we should not support regime change. Sometimes you get something way worse. Like Iraq, you get ISIS. Libya, you get civil war. This has unforeseen and often disastrous consequences, and that's why we should avoid reckless regime change wars when we can. Very often, you get even worse than what you used to get. And right now, if you have regime change in Iran, what do you think you'll get next? You have a regime change in Iran? You'll get a civil war, almost certainly. Oh, who cares if they have a civil war? Oh, okay. Where are all those people gonna go? To Europe. They're gonna flee. You'll create refugee crisis. If the Iranian people wanna have self determination and they wanna have a new form of government, so be it. We as the West should not be involved. We should not call shots because Iran is only a problem today because we got involved thinking we knew better.
Saved - June 8, 2025 at 2:14 AM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

🚨BREAKING: Border Czar Tom Homan says National Guard are going into Los Angeles tonight. This is the way. Lawlessness will no longer be tolerated. We are taking our country back. https://t.co/ogSL9La0t8

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elected officials and NGOs can't cross the line by doxxing ICE agents who wear masks to protect themselves and their families. ICE agents' lives and families have been threatened. ICE arrests sex offenders, robbers, public safety threats, national security threats, and gang members, making Los Angeles safer. These individuals are illegal aliens who committed a crime by crossing the border illegally, then committed another crime. The investigation concerns money laundering, tax evasion, and funds going to cartels in Mexico and Columbia that fund narcotics operations. The speaker says they are enforcing the law and will bring in the National Guard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, you know, like I said many times, these elected officials or these nongovernment organizations, they can't cross the line either. I mean, we got people like, you know, Hakim Jeffries saying he's gonna doxxize employees. You know, ICE agents out there with mask on. They wear masks to protect themselves and their families because they've been doxxed. Their families have been doxxed. Their life's been threatened. Their families have been threatened. I know myself. I had over a thousand protesters in my house. I expect that as the borders are, but these men and women are putting their lives online every day. They arrest a lot of bad people yesterday and today. They arrested shell sex offenders. They arrested people convicted of robbery. They arrested public safety, not only significant public safety threats, but national security threats. They arrested gang members. We're making Los Angeles safer, and mayor and mayor Bass all be thanking us for making her city safer. And the term migrant, as as Joe Concha rightfully said earlier, they're illegal aliens. There are there are illegal aliens in in this country, and we welcome. We're the most given country in the world. But these are illegal aliens who committed a crime by crossing this border illegally, then yet committed another crime. Again, yesterday's about a criminal investigation into mother laundering, tax evasion, and and and and some of the funds going to cartels in Mexico and and and Columbia that fund their operations of sending narcotics to this country, killing American people. This is about enforcing the law. And again, we're not gonna apologize for doing it. We're stepping up. She says they're gonna they're gonna mobilize. Well, guess what? We're already ahead of the game. We were already mobil izing. We're going to bring National Guard in tonight. We're going to continue doing our job. We're we're going to push back on these people, and we're going to force a law. Tom, it's Olivia.
Saved - June 6, 2025 at 2:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared 50 significant achievements from Trump's Big Beautiful Bill that I believe the media is overlooking. Highlights include no taxes on tips for service workers, permanent tax cuts, a raised child tax credit, and substantial spending cuts. The bill also enforces work requirements for welfare, enhances border security, and revives apprenticeship programs. It promotes school choice, bans taxpayer-funded gender ideology, and protects American farmland. Overall, it emphasizes local control, merit, and fiscal responsibility, reflecting promises made and kept.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Here are 50 MAJOR wins from Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill that the media is ignoring 1. No taxes on tips — servers, bartenders, and bellhops just got a raise Promises made, promises kept 2.Made Trump tax cuts permanent — Biden wanted them to expire. 3.Child tax credit raised to $2,500 4.Overtime pay tax-free — work hard, actually keep more. 5.$1.6 trillion in spending cuts — the largest rollback of government bloat in U.S. history. http://6.Work requirement for welfare — able-bodied? Then get off the couch. 7.Deporting 1 million illegal immigrants per year — no more catch and release. 8. Builds the wall—finishes it — 701 miles of serious border protection. Massive! 9.10,000 new ICE agents — law and order at the border. Huge! 10.Eliminates Medicaid for illegal aliens — American benefits for Americans. 11.“Trump Savings Accounts” for kids — build generational wealth from birth. Game changer. 12.Slashes IRS funding — no more 87,000 new agents breathing down your neck. http://13.Green New Deal defunded — no more money for solar BS. http://14.Energy production unleashed — back to drilling, fracking, etc. 15.Tariffs on Chinese-built ships — protect American shipbuilders. http://16.Buy American, build American — required on all infrastructure projects. http://17.Estate tax protections expanded — family farms and businesses stay in the family. 18.Repeals DEI mandates — merit matters again. DEI is dying. 19.Bans taxpayer-funded gender ideology in federal agencies. 20.Military pay raise + benefits boost 21.National missile defense (“Golden Dome”) 22.HSA accounts expanded — use them for direct primary care. http://23.School choice tax credits — parents, not unions, control education. Historic! 24.Feds barred from mandating pronoun usage. 25.Medicaid block grants to states — local control, not DC strings. Saves hundreds of billions. 26.Revives apprenticeship programs — college not required to succeed. The cartel hates this. 27.1% of exports must ship under U.S. flag 28.Mandates voter ID for federal elections. 29.Ends ESG mandates in retirement accounts 30.Cracks down on Big Pharma middlemen 31.Bans drag shows for kids at federally funded venues. 32.Fires the climate cult from federal boards 33.Veterans get priority housing access 34. Tax credit for buying American-made vehicles 35.Stops Chinese ownership of U.S. farmland — our soil is finally protected!. 36.Bans CRT from federal training programs. 37.Ends taxpayer-funded abortions abroad. And defunds planned parenthood! 38.Guts federal diversity czars — cuts the bloated bureaucracy. 39.Revives the Keystone XL pipeline . 40. Eliminates federal COVID emergency powers 41.Enacts Social Security tax cuts for seniors. 42.Defends religious liberty in the workplace 43. Restores due process on college campuses. 44. Massively expands trade school funding 45. Outlaws federal funding for gender transitions for minors. 46. Creates nationwide “patriot curriculum” grant fund 47.Halts funding to the UN’s woke agenda arms. 48. Tax breaks for adoption and large families. 49. Increases penalties for fentanyl trafficking — life in prison for cartels. 50. Restores cash bail in federal jurisdictions — no more revolving-door criminals. And this is just a taste. Promises made, promises kept. 🇺🇸

Saved - May 30, 2025 at 8:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has ordered a women's-only nude spa in Seattle to admit a biologically male individual, citing it as discrimination. It feels like the rights of a few are prioritized over the safety and comfort of women.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

A Christian-owned, women's-only nude spa in Seattle has been ordered by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to admit a mentally ill, predatory, biologically male pervert to use the spa. Judge Margaret McKewon, a Clinton appointee, writes that having a women's-only nude spa is equivalent to having a restaurant that bans black people. The left will always choose the rights of the most disgusting freaks over the well-being of normal people.

Saved - May 30, 2025 at 9:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I keep seeing the press claim that illegal immigrants don’t receive welfare, but that’s not true. James O'Keefe's recent video exposes a Nevada DHHS specialist who openly admits to bending the rules to enroll migrants in programs they shouldn’t qualify for. This isn’t just an isolated case; there are likely many officials doing the same. It feels like our bureaucratic system is being exploited daily by those who are intent on taking advantage of our resources to benefit illegal immigrants.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Over and over, the press runs "fact checks" about how illegal immigrants don't receive welfare programs. And of course, it's a lie. James O'Keefe's latest video catches a Nevada DHHS specialist who describes in detail how he "bends the rules" to get migrants onto programs they aren't supposed to be eligible for. He obviously isn't a one-off. There are dozens, hundreds, maybe thousands of officials like him out there. Our bureaucracy is exploited every day by people who are passionate about looting our country to hand it away to illegal foreigners.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

“I Will Twist and Turn Our Provisions”: Nevada DHHS Specialist Caught on Camera Admitting to “Bending the Rules” to Provide Benefits for Illegal Immigrants “I get them emergency medical all the time… I just approve them for 12 months because I can. “ “Even undocumented people from Mexico and things; I can still get them benefits.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Deshaun Mack, a Nevada DHHS family services specialist, stated to an undercover journalist that he helps undocumented immigrants obtain medical benefits, sometimes approving them for a full twelve months instead of the required month-by-month basis. He said he does this "all the time just because I want to" and that he "bends the rules a lot" and will "twist and turn our provisions to fit the way that I want them to." When confronted by O'Keefe Media Group, Deshaun initially denied his statements, claiming everything he said was false and that he lies all the time. O'Keefe Media Group stated that they have recordings and documents to back up everything. O'Keefe Media Group cited Nevada statutes regarding misappropriation and falsification of accounts by a public officer and the Nevada False Claims Act, suggesting Deshaun's actions could be violations, potentially carrying jail time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So would that technically be subverting a law at Speaker 1: all at that point? Speaker 2: I do that a lot. I will I will twist and turn our provisions to fit the way that I want them to. So whether it's a law or not, I Speaker 3: I don't know because I Speaker 0: just Or care? Speaker 4: Or I don't care at work. Speaker 5: Deshaun Eli Mack is a family services specialist at the Nevada Department of Health and Human Services. Now his job is to help American families get support like health care, financial aid, and counseling. But he told our undercover journalist that he helps illegal immigrants stay in the country and get medical help, quote, all the time. While on what he thought was a date with our reporter, Deshaun said that he gets benefits for illegal immigrants from Cuba and Mexico. He says he gets them, quote, emergency medical all the time just because I want to, close quote. Speaker 0: So are you able to help undocumented people, like, with assistance to stay here and, like, get medical help and all that stuff? Speaker 2: Do it all the time. Unfortunately, after Trump got elected, we had a sharp decline in Cuban clientele and our undocumented clientele, but just one time we had. Speaker 0: Because they didn't wanna get found out? Speaker 2: Correct. And a few times, we and my coworkers have actually claimed to them, we would never call us. We do not vote with them ever. And I believe that is something we have on the books. We do not call Oh. A celebration ever. Oh, okay. I just approved that, but Speaker 6: Mhmm. Speaker 2: Oh, Cuban passport. Thank you. There you go. Even, like, undocumented people from my Mexico things, I can still get the benefits. I've been to all the time just because I want to. Speaker 5: Deshaun explained that illegal immigrants are supposed to apply for emergency medical care on a month by month basis, but he approves them for a full twelve months just because he can. Speaker 6: Even though it doesn't cover anything, Speaker 7: still likely for emergency medical emergency medical Speaker 2: is a month by month basis, and it's supposed to be used for undocumented people if they, like, they get hospitalized or something. So that they're not putting the bill, Medicaid can cover some Speaker 6: of those expenses. But they're supposed Speaker 2: to, like, apply every month, such as improvement for twelve months because that's more. Speaker 5: When our undercover journalist asked Deshaun if this was allowed, he responded, quote, I make it so. He admitted that he, quote, bends the rules a lot. Speaker 0: Oh, is that, like, allowed technically? Or I make it. Speaker 2: Nice. So I've been in the wolf a lot because I want I don't know. If you come see me, I'm gonna use it at both. Speaker 6: That's just how it works. Speaker 0: Like, no matter who you are pretty much? Speaker 2: Yeah. I'm just giving you benefits because the furrow of my tax money. Oh. So to the extent that I'm able to, but I've been the ones a lot. Speaker 0: I'm just I'm sure there's many ways to flout the system in Yeah. In every department, I'm sure. Speaker 2: Correct. It just takes certain people to do it. Speaker 5: When Deshaun was asked if the conduct was subverting the law, he responded, quote, I do that a lot. Speaker 0: So would that technically be subverting a law at Speaker 1: all at that point? Speaker 2: I do that a lot. I will flip I will twist and turn our provisions to sit the way that I want them to. So whether it's a law Speaker 3: or not, I is I don't know I just Or care? Speaker 4: Yeah. I don't care after. Speaker 5: Now what are the laws that Deshaun is subverting? Misappropriation and falsification of accounts by a public officer. The statute prohibits public officers from knowingly keeping false accounts or making false entries related to public funds. Deshaun's approval of ineligible individuals for extended Medicaid coverage could be a violation, as well as the Nevada False Claims Act. This prohibits the submission of false claims for payment to the state of Nevada, like knowingly approving benefits for individuals who are not eligible. It appears in this video that Deshaun Mack is violating federal and state laws that our hidden cameras caught him saying he was subverting, he was bending the rules, he was doing things he should not be doing. Mister Mack, the family service specialist at the Nevada DHHS could potentially base jail time for what O'Keefe media caught him doing and these alleged violations. Speaker 6: Hello? Speaker 8: Hi. Is this Deshaun? Speaker 6: Who's calling? Speaker 8: Hey. This is from O'Keefe Media Group. How are doing? Speaker 6: I don't know who this is. Speaker 8: You said this is your quote. You're on a date with an undercover journalist. You said emergency medical is a month to month by basis. Right? Then you said, well, Medicare can cover some of those expenses, but they're so supposed to apply every month. You said I quote bend the rules a lot. I'm quoting you. These are your words. I'm just giving you benefits. That's where I want my tax money to go. So it seems like you're taking this position that you just don't really care. Speaker 6: Nope. I definitely care. Speaker 8: How do you care? Speaker 6: I don't know. You tell me. Speaker 8: I'm asking you, and I'm quoting you, Deshaun. Deshaun. Speaker 6: You are quoting me. Speaker 8: I am Speaker 6: quoting you. Speaker 8: And do you stand by your quotes? Speaker 6: Was I aware that I was being recorded? Speaker 8: It's a one party consent state, sir. Speaker 6: Oh, that's nice. Now how do you know I said anything that I stand by? Speaker 8: Because I have you on video and your lips are moving. That's why. Speaker 6: Sounds good. Yeah. So Senior O'Keefe Media Group? Speaker 8: Yes, sir. Do you stand by your comments, Dushan? Speaker 6: I told you everything I said was false. Speaker 8: Do you stand by them, or are you denying everything you said? Are were you lying to the journalist? Deshaun? Speaker 6: I see a lot of things that I don't absolutely lie all the time. Speaker 8: So you it's so specific. It's so interesting that you're so specific, Deshaun. Mhmm. And why did you say this? Were you trying to impress a date, I'm assuming? Absolutely. It's a little bit weird. I don't really care. It's a you don't care. You don't care that you're breaking provisions and bending the rules and twisting and turning provisions. Is that right? Speaker 6: Nope. I never said that. Speaker 8: Do you think that what do you think the Department of Health and Human Services will think of your words? Speaker 6: I don't know. How do you know they're true? Speaker 8: Because you said them, and you work for DHHS. True. Well, we gave them the quotes, so they'll find out and probably talk to you, I'm assuming. Right? Uh-oh. So let me ask you this. Do how long have you been just giving out emergency medical benefits for twelve months for illegal immigrants? Do you vet these people? Speaker 6: Something to you. Speaker 8: Go ahead, Deshaun. Speaker 6: What do you think we what do you think we do? Do you think we vet them? Yes or no? Speaker 8: You told me that it looks like you don't. You just give out you said, quote, I just approved them. Oh, Cuban passport? Thank you. Here you go. Even undocumented people from Mexico and things, I can still get them benefits. So you're just giving out people or giving out health benefits to people per year when it's supposed to be month by month basis per the Nevada state law. Is that correct? Speaker 6: Is that the Nevada state law? Speaker 8: I'm asking you your comment I don't know. On those things. You said I bend the rules a lot. I twist and turn our provisions. You said I don't care. So I would just wanna know if you actually stand by your words. Speaker 6: None of those words I said were true. So Speaker 8: Well, thank you very much, Deshaun. We're gonna be publishing this, and we'll be publishing your video, tomorrow. So we will send this to you, and I will send it. Speaker 6: I'll let my lawyer reach out. Have a good day. Speaker 8: Thank you, Deshaun. Speaker 5: Unfortunately, I have recordings and documents to back up everything I'm about to tell you. Speaker 0: If we're about to paint James as a criminal, it better be fucking good. Speaker 5: They sent a pic of Speaker 0: me nailed to Speaker 5: a cross. They used these kids. Speaker 6: And it wasn't right. Speaker 5: It was the timing of it that was so suspicious.
Saved - May 26, 2025 at 1:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The SPLC has added Turning Point to their "hate group" list alongside the KKK and neo-Nazis, which I see as a desperate smear from an organization that has profited from fear for decades. Despite their claims, they continue to make over $100 million annually while living comfortably in their "Poverty Palace." Their tactics include pressuring financial institutions and schools to isolate us, reminiscent of past violence against groups like the Family Research Council. In 2025, their credibility is shot, and being on their list feels like a badge of honor, showing our effectiveness.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

The SPLC has added Turning Point to their ridiculous “hate group” list, right next to the KKK and neo-Nazis, a cheap smear from a washed-up org that’s been fleecing scared grandmas for decades. They somehow still rake in over $100 million a year peddling their “hate map” nonsense, sitting pretty in their Montgomery “Poverty Palace” while crying about “hate” to line their pockets. Even former staffers called their racket a “con.” Their game plan? Scare financial institutions into debanking us, pressure schools to cancel us, and demonize us so some unhinged lunatic feels justified targeting us. Remember the Family Research Council? An SPLC-inspired gunman went after them. They’d love nothing more than to see TPUSA in the crosshairs. But it’s 2025, and nobody with a functioning brain buys their garbage anymore. The SPLC is a laughingstock, a hollowed-out husk of an organization that’s been exposed as a grift time and time again. They’re not just irrelevant—they’re a cautionary tale of how to torch your own credibility. Maybe someone should take a hard look at where all that “nonprofit” money’s really going? Being on their list is a badge of honor. It means they’re terrified that we’re so effective. Keep crying, SPLC—America’s done with your scam.

Saved - May 16, 2025 at 3:37 AM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

A C-SPAN caller drops the infuriating truth about Chinese maternity houses where pregnant Chinese women are flown to America to give birth and secure U.S. citizenship for their babies, then return to China to raise them loyal to the CCP. END BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP NOW. https://t.co/jXx1cDux4C

Video Transcript AI Summary
A caller asked if the guest knew about Chinese maternity houses, where the Chinese government allegedly sends pregnant citizens in their seventh or eighth month to the US to give birth, after which they return to China with US citizen children who are raised loyal to China. The caller also questioned why a baby born in the US to a mother from Trendel Agua was not sent back with the mother. The guest responded that a mother is still a mother unless actively abusing the child. Regarding the first comment, the guest acknowledged the existence of a birth tourism industry where people pay to come to the US to give birth. He stated there is evidence that some countries, possibly including China, send people to the US to give birth so that those children can later claim US citizenship after living in their home countries for many years. He believes abuses like these led to President Trump's executive order.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'd like to know if your guest knows what a Chinese maternity house is. Their house is where the Chinese government takes citizens that when they're in their seventh or eighth month, they ship them here for a month. They let them have their children. And then once they have their children, they take them back to China, where now they're US citizens. But they're raised in China. They're loyal to China. We know they're doing it, but they're still getting away with it. And on the other one, with that two year old kid, I noticed how when you read the thing that the daughter was from the two year old where the babe the baby was here. We kept her here because the mother was from Trendel Agua. And why would we send the baby back with a mother like that? Thank you. Speaker 1: Well, I I respect to the latter, it's just my opinion. A mother is still a mother. Be a bad person, but still a mother and and, you know, unless you're engaging in active child abuse, she's still a mother. You know, with respect to your first comment, yes, one of the there is a birth tourism industry where people will pay to come to our shores, in their seventh or eighth month of pregnancy when it's still relatively safe to travel, and they will then stay in hospitals until they give birth, and they will go back into their countries. And and there are certainly evidence out there that there are some countries, surprised me if it was China, that are in fact sending people here to give birth, so that at some point, they can take those children who have been living back in China, for, you know, many, many years and bring them back to The United States and then claim that they are that the people that are coming back to The United States are in fact US citizens by dint of the fact that they were born on our shores. I believe it is exactly abuses like that among many that led president Trump to enter the executive order that he did. Alright. That's John
Saved - May 12, 2025 at 2:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently came across a conversation between two Muslims in Michigan about their ambitious housing development project. They plan to direct most HOA fees to a mosque and are considering naming the streets after notable Islamic conquerors. One name mentioned is "Andalusia," referencing the period when Spain was under Muslim rule. It’s clear that some Muslims still view the West as an opportunity for expansion, and they seem enthusiastic about pursuing this vision.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Two Muslims in Michigan discuss their plans for a development of several hundred houses, with plans to keep non-Muslims out by routing almost all HOA fees to a mosque. They talk about naming streets after famous Islamic conquerors. The even discuss the name "Andalusia" — a reference to Al-Andalus, the name for Spain when it was ruled by Muslims a thousand years ago. Make no mistake, there are still many Muslims who see the West as ripe for conquest — and they are gleefully working to make that happen.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses plans for a Muslim village with street names honoring historical conquerors like Khalid Al Nil Waleed and Tariq Bin Ziyad. The aim is to evoke past glories. The speaker emphasizes that the village should not be exclusive to Muslims. A significant portion (75%) of the yearly maintenance fee will be allocated to the masjid. The speaker also mentions an application to select street names in the United States.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So we're still debating on the name but it's gonna be something Muslim name and a village attached to it, right? The names of the streets Khalid Al Nil Waleed, Tariq Bin Ziyad, like, all the great conquerors. Like, people need to Google those conquerors and then we wanna have different sections, like, on the Lucia, this, that, like, all our past glories and we wanna bring it back. The way what we're doing, brother, like, you cannot make it exclusive, like, non Muslims not allowed, Kufar not allowed. What we're doing, there's something called association fee. I don't know what it's called in Dubai. Like, your maintenance fee that you pay yearly to cutting the service fee, to cut the grass, to remove the snow, and whatnot. So that service fee will put there 75% of the service fee you're paying goes to the masjid. Brother, we're putting an application now where we're selecting the names of the streets in United States Of America.
Saved - May 8, 2025 at 3:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I captured John Bryan, Prince Andrew's crisis advisor, on hidden camera admitting that Prince Andrew was involved with underage girls. Virginia Giuffre, one of those girls, tragically died on April 25th, and her father insists she did not take her own life, claiming someone harmed her.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

BREAKING: James O'Keefe has captured Prince Andrew crisis advisor John Bryan on hidden camera admitting that Prince Andrew was indeed "f***ing underage girls." Virginia Giuffre, one of those underage girls, died on April 25th after reportedly committing suicide. Her father, Sky Roberts, has publicly denied death by suicide: "There’s no way that she did. Somebody got to her.”

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

WORLD EXCLUSIVE: 'Prince Andrew Was F*ing Underage Girls' — Tape of Royal Family Advisor Exposes Prince Andrew’s Sexual Relations with Minors and Deep Ties to Jeffrey Epstein https://t.co/NS517Kob18

Video Transcript AI Summary
John Bryan, a long-time confidant of the British royal family, claims he raised Sarah Ferguson's children, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie, and maintained a friendship with Prince Andrew. He says he fell in love with Prince Andrew's wife after they separated and lived together for seven years. Prince Andrew's connection to Jeffrey Epstein became public in 2010. Virginia Dufres alleged in 2014 that Epstein paid her to have sex with Prince Andrew when she was 17. She reportedly died by suicide in April 2024. Prince Andrew denied the allegations in a 2019 BBC interview, which was a PR disaster. Bryan says he advised Prince Andrew after the interview. He claims Prince Andrew was distressed and unable to concentrate. Bryan initially believed Prince Andrew was innocent, but now states that Prince Andrew did have sex with underage girls and lied to him about Epstein.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For Daniel, he was in the navy. He was two hundred and fifty days at the scene. Never saw it for me. I was really pissed because he lied to me. Lied about Epstein. And then I did a big thing in the Daily Mail saying that I believed David, and then I found out he was lying. I was so pissed. No. He was boundering curls. That's not cool. Speaker 1: John Bryan has been a close confidant to the British royal family for a long time. He worked for Queen Elizabeth the second, was, quote, best friends with Princess Diana, and had a long term intimate relationship with the Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson. According to Bryan, he practically raised Sarah Ferguson's children, the princesses Beatrice and Eugene. And Brian said that he maintained a friendship with Ferguson's husband, the Duke of York, Prince Andrew. Speaker 0: Tell me, like, your story. Show my story. You want me to what I'm talking What? Like, I've been so famous Okay. That's prince Andrew's wife. They were separated. And so that I of fell in love. And we lived together for, like, seven years And my house knew one. And I raised her two little children for some reason. Wait. Princess Eugenie. And Eugenie. Those were my children. Those were my kids. I raised those kids. That's a great day to day raise. I was father of the Lord. Speaker 1: Prince Andrew's connection to Jeffrey Epstein emerged in 02/2010 when photos showed them walking together in New York's Central Park. Epstein had already been convicted in 02/2008 of procuring a 14 year old girl for prostitution. In 2014, a woman named Virginia Dufres alleged in a Florida court filing that Jeffrey Epstein paid her to have sex with Prince Andrew when she was 17, a minor. On April 25, a few weeks ago, Dufres died by, quote, suicide. Prince Andrew denied Dufres' sex abuse allegations a now infamous 2019 BBC interview. Speaker 2: She said she had sex with you three times. Once on his private island in a group of seven or eight other girls. Speaker 0: No. Speaker 2: No to all of it. Speaker 0: All of it. Absolutely no to all of it. Speaker 1: The interview was a public relations disaster for the royal family and prompted the queen to strip prince Andrew of his royal duties. In the aftermath of that interview, the prince sought advice from a long time royal family confidant, John Bryan. Speaker 0: We go have dinner at his house. We have dinner at my house to see his kids. So then we're we go to. We sell to France, and I get a big property, like, 10 Okay. Right here in Central Bank. Right? You know, nobody has 10 acres. I'm on the biggest property here in Blouse. Okay. And I rent it so that we price. Right? Because there's paparazzi everywhere there's. Speaker 1: Two weeks after prince Andrew's BBC interview, John Bryan was brought to the Royal Lodge where prince Andrew lives to offer crisis management advice. According to the Telegraph, the meeting was conducted discreetly. At the royal residence, Bryan observed that Prince Andrew was visibly distressed and struggling to focus, reportedly unable to concentrate for more than forty minutes at a time due to the strain he was under. As reported in the Daily Mail, John Bryan constructed a five page document emphasizing that Prince Andrew should publicly show empathy for Epstein's victims. Back in November 2022, Brian publicly stated that he believed Prince Andrew was innocent of the claims made against him related to the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking scheme. Now, in our exclusive hidden camera undercover footage, John Brian reveals for the first time that Prince Andrew did in fact have sex with underage girls. Speaker 0: I was so pissed about that. I was really pissed fine. I was really pissed because he lied to me about it. Lied about? About Epstein. Yeah. No. I knew he saw him. Speaker 1: Now our newsroom has some concerns about where this investigation is headed and who may be implicated, but our only motivation in doing these stories is the public's right to know. And if this report and our subsequent reports shine a light into darkness and expose evil, then we are willing to take the risks. At the end of the day, child victims of Jeffrey Epstein need to be protected, and the people involved need to be held accountable by law enforcement immediately. Without accountability, our notion of freedom is just an illusion. We're gonna be breaking our next stories exclusively at okeefemediagroup.com. You may see this project Veritas sign behind me. Stay tuned for next week.
Saved - May 6, 2025 at 5:08 AM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

CAL STATE LONG BEACH SHOWED UP TODAY 🔥🔥🔥 These students are ready for change in California. https://t.co/RS7lljBykb

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker greets a large crowd in California and asks if they are ready for change. The speaker states they are honored to be there.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How we doing in California? This is a big crowd for California. I'll tell you what, everybody. Who's ready for some change in California? Know what mean? Honored to be here, guys. We
Saved - May 6, 2025 at 4:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I think Evan Vucci’s photo of Donald Trump post-assassination attempt is iconic, possibly the most famous of the decade. It's absurd that the Pulitzer Prize committee rejected it for best breaking news photograph of 2024 just because it made Trump look good. Total joke.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Evan Vucci’s photograph of Donald Trump after last summer’s assassination attempt is iconic — maybe the single most famous photo of the past decade. But because it made Trump look good, the Pulitzer Prize committee just refused to give it the award for best breaking news photograph of 2024. Total joke.

Saved - May 2, 2025 at 5:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m frustrated by the misuse of taxpayer dollars, like funding parties at Caesars Palace, while babies and deceased individuals get federal loans. On a brighter note, Jesse Waters provided an insightful look into DOGE, highlighting a dedicated team working to address its issues.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Babies and dead people getting federal loans. Taxpayer dollars to hold parties in Caesars Palace. Jesse Waters just did an excellent deep dive into the real inner workings of DOGE. It shows a dedicated team of incredibly smart, driven, patriotic Americans trying to fix a looting operation that has spiraled out of control. Must-watch content.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk invited a group to observe his weekly Doge meeting, where they discussed efforts to combat government waste and fraud. They found instances of misuse of funds, such as the Department of Education's $4 billion COVID fund being used for parties at Caesar's Palace and stadium rentals. Requiring receipts halted these withdrawals. The Small Business Administration gave loans to dead people and even unborn children. The Inter American Foundation (IAF) spends only 58% of its funds on grantees, like alpaca farmers in Peru, with much of the money remaining in DC. Only 10-15 cents of each dollar reaches the intended recipient due to layers of stealing. The United States Institute of Peace was found to have loaded guns in its headquarters and a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban for unclear services. The chief accountant deleted over a terabyte of records, later recovered. Unspent funds were swept into a private bank account. The team referred the evidence to the FBI and DOJ. A generous government resignation program was initially met with suspicion, but is now gaining acceptance. The effort to combat waste and fraud is a long-term enterprise.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Elon Musk was nice enough to invite us into the Eisenhower Building last night to sit in on his weekly 10PM Doge meeting. Yeah. They usually meet at 10:00. I'm almost in bed by then. We met the whole crew, even big balls, and they showed us how Doge really gets done. We sat back, listened, and we learned a lot, and we hope you do too. Here's part one of our exclusive interview. Elon, thank you so much for bringing in to the meeting here. I'm gonna do something no anchor ever does. I'm not gonna talk. What? For Speaker 1: as long as possible You're talking right now. Speaker 0: I'm gonna let you run your meeting, and then I'll interrupt when I'm bored. Speaker 1: So take it away. So like a board meeting? Speaker 0: Like a board meeting. Exactly. Speaker 1: Alright. Well, I guess we normally go around the table, say what what do we get done this week? Speaker 2: Wait this way? Speaker 1: Sure. No. We start with you. Sure. Speaker 2: So, actually, a lot of great work at the treasury this week. One of the crazy things at with regards to the treasury is that when a payment is made and the computers of the treasury actually pay about $5,000,000,000,000 per year, like crazy amounts, there was formerly not a budget code on there. So if some payment was made, you didn't know actually what it was for. It could have been for anything. Yeah. There was a a 4,000,000,000 COVID fund in the Department of Education, and there was no receipts required. So people be just draw down Speaker 3: on it. Speaker 2: And when people looked into it, this wasn't just before us. They found that money was being used to rent out Caesar's Palace for parties, rent out stadiums, etc. And so the one change that Doge made with farm education is we had the simple requirement that if you draw down money, you must first upload a receipt. That was the only change that was made, you must upload your receipt. And upon doing so Yes. Nobody drew down any money anymore. Speaker 1: Yes. But we we didn't say that we'd check the receipt. You could send a fake receipt. You could send a picture of your dog. Anything. Anything. Anything. And and they but as soon as we asked for anything at all, they'd suddenly the requests were like, oh, we don't need it anymore. That's interesting. Speaker 0: They were renting Caesar's Palace. Speaker 1: Yes. They were, like, basically partying on the tax share of money. Speaker 0: Stadiums? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Leasing stadiums. Speaker 1: Leasing stadiums. Speaker 0: For what? Speaker 1: For parties, basically. For parties? Speaker 0: Yes. That's a big party. Speaker 1: It's a big party. You'd think if you were stealing, you'd start small. They do start small. But then over what happens is over the years so, generally, the fraud starts out small and they try to hide it. But then year after year, if nobody stops the fraud, it gets more and more brazen. And and every year, it gets bigger until they're literally renting out stadiums. I like in Speaker 0: I mean, I dollars to rent out a stadium? Speaker 1: Fraud infra infagrante delecto. Okay? We're talking at scale. Speaker 0: This is driving me crazy. Speaker 1: Oh, Speaker 0: yeah. When you find these things, do you guys get mad? You're like, yes. I got one. How does it how does it make you feel? Speaker 4: It's so common. Speaker 0: It's so common. You know, Speaker 1: she's doing it. I mean, you just get Speaker 5: numb to it. Speaker 1: Like, unfortunately, you get like, the the like, the hundredth time you've heard it, you it's hard not to get a little numb. Yeah. You know? But, like and by the two hundredth time, you're like, well, okay. It's just another day at the office. Speaker 5: We checked, is the small business administration giving loans to dead people, people over the age of 20? The answer was yes, and it was around $330,000,000 in total. Speaker 1: So People with a birthday that could not possibly be real. Yeah. Meaning, they're they're over a hundred they're 15 years old or older. The oldest living American is 14. So it's safe to say if anybody is in the in the system as a hundred and 15 years or older, that is fake. Speaker 6: So just by sharing a database and looking at Social Security numbers, that showed that at the time of the loan, they had listed as over 15 years old or actually 11. We didn't even check for 18. Speaker 1: Babies and dead Speaker 6: 11 years old. Speaker 7: That's pretty clear. Speaker 1: Babies and dead people who were getting loans. Speaker 6: That was 660,000,000. Speaker 1: Yeah. And also people with birth dates in the future. What does that mean? Well, in one I mean, I think the like, the birth date birth date, I think, in one Speaker 0: case was like Fetuses were getting loans? Speaker 1: No. Not even. No. Really sort of like you're talking about, like, your great grandchildren. Like, with the birth date, like, of I think it was, like, 2165. So more than a century from now was the birth date. Speaker 0: George Jetson was getting paid. Speaker 1: Yes. Because your birthday is in the future, like the far like the far future, not like next year. Right. And we either this is either fraudulent or we have your birthday wrong. Speaker 0: Right. It's either a typo or someone stealing. Speaker 1: Which is it? Yeah. Right. Yes. You should you should at least ask which is it? Speaker 0: Do you guys feel you're getting justice and accountability? Speaker 7: One of the the extreme examples of nonattentability in some cases has occurred at some of the small agencies. I think the Inter American Foundation, IAF, is one of the agencies we visited where they get $50,000,000 a year congressional money to give grants. These are things like alpaca farming in Peru, Speaker 1: improving them That's a real example. Yes. Speaker 7: That's a real description. Improving the marketability of peas in Guatemala. Really? Fruit jam. And yes. What? Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 7: So you might expect, you know, in the private sector, a nonprofit to give, you know, 80 to 90% of their money to grantees. In the case of IAF, that was 58%. Speaker 3: So the other half goes towards management Speaker 7: Oh, yeah. Travel. Speaker 1: What what we find exactly, I mean, to as an example is is that even if you agreed with with supporting alpaca farmers in Peru, well, actually, most of the money never made it out of DC. Mhmm. It's going into the pockets of people in in the neighborhood. Speaker 0: What percentage Speaker 1: And it didn't get to Peru. Speaker 0: Right. So what percentage do you think doesn't even get to the destination it's supposed to? Speaker 1: I believe the GAO estimates, this is not our estimate, I believe it was on the order of only 10 to 15¢ on the dollar actually gets to the end recipient whether you agree with that cause or not. Speaker 0: So they're just stealing the money before it even gets anywhere? Speaker 1: There's layers of stealing. So there's, like, there's the first layer of stealing, second layer of stealing, third layer of stealing. Subcontractor, subcontractor. Yeah. Exactly. Contractor, subcontractor, subcontractor. It's like peeling an onion. And then maybe and sometimes it's zero. Just flat you you get to the bottom of the onion. There's nothing there. Speaker 0: So maybe no one got Speaker 1: a sex change in Guatemala. It's possible that no one got a sex change in Guatemala. Speaker 4: I overheard a contractor tell one of her colleagues to falsify billable hours by creating a PowerPoint to mask a delay in the onboarding process in front of me. And this is like hour zero at this agency. And so, I mean, this is just a common theme that you take a look at these contracts, you take a look at these grants, and it's veiled in noble rhetoric. It's at the top level. It's like Speaker 1: Sounds good. Speaker 4: Yeah. It sounds amazing. And then you actually just follow what is the what are the funds actually doing? Speaker 1: Well, send us a picture. Exactly. And The the send us a picture request is incredibly good. Like, Pixar didn't happen. And then they're and and it wouldn't be that hard to just frankly, they could search for some fake pics on the Internet or get AI to generate the pics, but they don't even bother doing that. Speaker 0: So you you caught them cold billing fraud. Speaker 4: Oh, I caught them her advising her colleague to do this because it takes a few days to onboard. So that is being investigated right now. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, generally, like like, these programs, these grants are gonna be, like, along the lines of save the baby pandas. And it's like, well, of course, who wouldn't wanna save the baby pandas? And and, you know, in some cases, they've got a a show panda, which they will they will try it out for special occasions. In a lot of cases, they don't even have a show panda. No panda. There's not even one panda. And we because we asked for pictures, and we don't even get one panda. And he's like, well, you gotta well, that's a lot of you know, what's the what's what does a billion dollars get you? Does it not even get you one panda? Speaker 0: You really wanna see a baby panda? Speaker 1: Yeah. That will like, you know, like the Ebola money. We're like, okay. Well, we agree with, like, we shouldn't have Ebola. You know? Where is the money going? Oh, it's going to Deloitte and DC. Like, what what is an accounting firm doing with Ebola money? Speaker 0: What has been the biggest resistance? Is there one agency? Is there one department that when you guys walk in, they all start fighting you, start hiding gonna talk. I'm sorry. Speaker 1: But I guess you can answer that question. Sure. I mean, let's let's yes. We've we've certainly had some battles. Battles? Yeah. Yeah. I mean Yeah. Speaker 0: The the who who Speaker 1: should talk about you, sir? Oh, Nate. Yeah. Okay. Speaker 3: Yeah. So, Jesse, there's there's Nate. See, a small agency called the United States Institute of Peace. It's definitely the agency we had the most fight at. We actually went into the agency and found they had loaded guns inside of their headquarters. Institute for Peace. Speaker 1: I mean, any given company any given organizational name is gonna be kinda be the opposite of the title. Right. Yeah. Speaker 3: Yeah. And so it was the by far the least peaceful agency that we've worked with Yeah. Ironically. Of course. Additionally, we found that they were spending money on things like private jets, and they even had a 130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban. Get out of real. We don't encounter that in most agencies. Speaker 0: Yeah. What was the money going to the Taliban for? Speaker 3: So it was a contractor. They received a hundred and $30,000 for generic services. And to Elon's point, there was not actually a clear description of what the contractor services were for. Was it for opium? Unclear. Or weapons? Nothing. Or or nothing. Speaker 0: Or abroad. Or, yeah, nothing. Speaker 3: And and you naturally have to ask the question, how did we get here? Like, when the country was founded, there were only four agencies. Today, there are over 400. So there's been a 100 x increase in the number of agencies since the founding of the nation. And thanks to president Trump, he's now signed two executive orders to start to reduce the number of agencies in the government, and the institute of peace was one of them, which is why our team went in to try and understand what was going on. And that's when we found all of the craziness, like the weapons in their armory. We found the payments to the Taliban. Speaker 1: Okay. Yeah. Speaker 2: The the accountants too. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. So just to hide the evidence. Speaker 3: Right. So just a few hours after we got into their headquarters, we found that their chief accountant had actually deleted over a terabyte of records from several years. So you'd have to ask the question, well, why would somebody do that? And the Doge team, fortunately, was able to recover that data with the help of a few great employees at the Institute of Peace. And I think the most troubling thing was they received $55,000,000 a year from congress, and any money that went unspent instead of returning that to congress, they would sweep it into a private bank account, which had no congressional oversight, and that's what they would use to fund things like events at their headquarters and the private jets. And I think it's a great example because most most Americans don't know what's going on at a lot of these smaller agencies, and this is, I think, the most extreme case of some of the wasteful spend that we're finding. Speaker 0: So the agencies are hiding money from you. They're sending it to the Taliban. They have loaded weapons in the department buildings. Speaker 3: At the Institute of Peace. Speaker 0: At the Institute of Peace. Yeah. Speaker 3: That's Speaker 0: right. So this is a cover up when you guys roll in. Speaker 1: This one, yes, a cover up. It's a cover They did delete a vast amount of financial information. That's really a definition of a cover up. Speaker 0: Isn't that illegal to delete evidence? Speaker 4: Yes. Speaker 0: Shred documents? Speaker 3: Is. It's it's certainly illegal to delete accounting records that they that congress would certainly want to know where where the congressionally appropriate funds are going from from taxpayers. When you catch them going Hillary style on their Speaker 0: computers, do you refer this to the Department of Justice? Speaker 3: In this case, we did refer the evidence in the accounting example to the FBI and DOJ. We were proud to do that. So, yes, we did. Speaker 5: Resistance has shown up in some very surprising places. So for example, the famous fork in the road email, the deferred resignation program. So this was a program where you could resign from the government, collect pay and benefits for the next eight months. Probably the most attractive separation program ever in human history. And the resistance actually came from the outside with people saying this is a trick. And I've heard somebody refer to it as apple with a razor blade. And no, this was just a really juicy apple, caramel dipped apple. It it it was that good, but people were talked out of out of taking it. And now what started to happen is we did have about 80,000 people take it, and now those folks who did take it are on the beach or they've moved on to a new job, and they're still getting paid. And so now we're starting to offer fork two and fork three where people can see that someone's eaten this apple, and it was actually really tasty and good for them. Speaker 0: Is Doge just getting started? Is this is a long term enterprise. Speaker 1: It's a long term enterprise that because if if we take our eye off the ball, the waste and fraud will come roaring back. Speaker 0: They can doge doge when Democrats get back in power. Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I think some of the things that I'd like we're to have it be such that the funding is is removed, so the grants are gone. So this it that if there's a lot of work required to restart the waste of fraud. And and that that will at least slow it down.
Saved - May 2, 2025 at 3:02 AM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Ilhan Omar just told a Daily Caller video reporter to “f**k off” when he attempted to ask her a simple question about Kilmer Abrego Garcia. This woman has no class, no gratitude to America, and no honor. Truly a disgrace to the US Congress. https://t.co/5sanRI1Oum

Video Transcript AI Summary
A Daily Caller News Foundation reporter, Miles Morrell, asked Congresswoman Omar if she thought more of her Democratic colleagues should travel to El Salvador to advocate for Rodrigo Garcia. Omar responded by telling the reporter to "fuck off." The reporter asked why, and Omar stated she was not taking any more questions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congresswoman Omar, I'm Miles Morrell with the Daily Caller News Foundation. Do you think more of your Democratic colleagues should be traveling to El Salvador to advocate on behalf of Rodrigo Garcia? I think you should fuck off. Yeah. That's I'm so I'm sorry. What, congressman? Should fuck off. Who should? You. Why me? Speaker 1: I'm not taking any more questions right now, but here you go. Speaker 0: Yeah. Thanks.
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 8:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just released 10,000 pages of documents on RFK's assassination, with another 50,000 on the way. We have a team at the National Archives working on scanning these materials. Secretary Kennedy reviewed the documents prior to their release, and they support his long-standing inquiries into his father's death. Notably, there are accounts of a woman at the scene shouting about the shooting and communications from other countries indicating knowledge of the assassination before it occurred. These documents raise more questions than they answer, and I look forward to the next batch.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard has just released 10,000 pages of documents on the assassination of RFK, with 50,000 more coming, that have just been sitting in the National Archives: "We have over 100 people at National Archives going through and scanning, and that will be the second release that we'll have here shortly." "Secretary Kennedy had the opportunity to review these documents before the release occurred...He's already spent a lot of time, as you can imagine, throughout his life, trying to seek the truth here ... You will see a number of documents that that really support the questions that Secretary Kennedy has been asking for decades around who really killed his father. There was, for example, a woman who ran away from the scene of the shooting yelling, 'we shot him! We shot him!' There are other documents there that show different countries were sending messages to each other around Senator Kennedy's assassination and saying that he had been assassinated, but that was before he was actually killed. So there are a lot of different questions I think, in my view, these documents provide the background to more questions than answers. We'll see what the next 50,000 pages brings forward."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The National Archives is processing a second release of documents related to Senator Kennedy's assassination. RFK Jr. stated in 2018 that evidence disturbed him and that the wrong person may have been convicted of his father's murder, raising the possibility of a second gunman. Documents at archives.gov/rfk support questions about who killed Senator Kennedy, including a woman fleeing the scene yelling, "We shot him," and State Department cables referencing the assassination before it occurred. A radicalized individual, Ali Kabar Mohammed Amin, was arrested for sending direct threats to the speaker and her husband, including hundreds of threatening text messages and calls. The threats included explicit statements like, "We know where you live. We will come after you," and similar threats were directed at the speaker. The speaker thanked the FBI, U.S. Marshals, and local law enforcement for their quick action, emphasizing the need to take such threats seriously, especially given past tragedies and assassination attempts against the president.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Around senator Kennedy's assassination that we have over a hundred people at National Archives going through and scanning, and that will be the second, release that we'll have here shortly. Speaker 1: So the ambassador hotel is where it took place. Sohan Saran is the one serving life sentence for the murder of Palestinian immigrant mad, apparently, of the president of the senator and presidential candidate's loyalty to Israel. And this is what RFK junior, who's now HHS secretary, said in 2018. Said I went there because I was curious and disturbed by what I had seen in the evidence. I was disturbed that the wrong person might have been convicted of killing my father. My father was the chief law enforcement officer in the country. I think it would have been, disturbed him if someone was put in jail for a crime they didn't commit. And he indicated that there might have been a second gunman. You told him these these, documents were coming out. Did he indicate to you that he thought there might have been somebody else involved? Speaker 0: You know, secretary Kennedy had the opportunity to review these documents before the release occurred. But but as you point out there in his quote, he's already spent a lot of time, as you can imagine, throughout his life trying to seek the truth here. And what you'll find in as folks go to archives.gov/rfk, they will see a number of documents that that really support the questions that secretary Kennedy has been asking for decades around who really killed his father. There there, for example, was a woman who ran away from the scene of the shooting yelling, we got him. We or, she yelled, we shot him. We shot him. There are other documents there. I mentioned state department cables that showed different countries were sending messages to each other around senator Kennedy's assassination saying that he had been assassinated, but that was before he was actually killed. So there are a lot of different questions. I think in my view, documents provide the background to more questions than answers. We'll see what the next 50,000 pages brings forward. Speaker 1: So there was a there was somebody who gave youth threatening messages, wanted to take your life, and he's been arrested. Ali Kabar Mohammed Amin. Al Al Kabar Mohammed Amin, twenty four years old from Georgia. He said to you to prepare to die and to and to your husband, tell your wife, basically to be loyal to Vladimir Putin and obey his orders. Your thoughts about his capture and the threat. Speaker 0: Well, it's first of all, this is a radicalized, individual, who started sending direct threats both to me and my husband weeks ago. He found my husband's phone number and was constantly texting him. There are well of hundreds of text messages, called him numerous times a day. Of course, he didn't answer the call, but with very, very explicit direct threats. We know where you live. We will come after you. Come after your wife. Come after your family. You will be killed. And I received similar, threats myself. So I want to just say thank you to the FBI and the U. S. Marshals and local law enforcement there in Georgia who, when presented with evidence, conducted an investigation and quickly brought him in and arrested him. It it has obviously stopped stopped the threats from coming in, but these things have to be taken seriously. And, when we look at what had the the tragedies our country has experienced in the past, we look at the fact that our own president had two assassination attempts in his life just recently. What happens when political differences turn into political violence? They have to be taken seriously. Speaker 1: It's it's hard enough to serve, but I don't have to worry about your own life at the same time. Thanks. Thank goodness they got this guy. Thank you for joining us today, the director of national intelligence. Speaker 0: Thank you, Brian. Speaker 1: Tulsi Gabbard.
Saved - April 17, 2025 at 12:30 AM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

DEMOCRAT MATH Step 1: Flood California with millions of illegals Step 2: Declare it a sanctuary state Step 3: Give them all free healthcare Step 4: Ask US taxpayers for a $6.2 billion bailout. Shocker! https://t.co/GsWAKORxHQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
California may become the first state to achieve universal health coverage, offering full-scope Medi-Cal to all low-income residents, regardless of age or immigration status, starting January 2024. Governor Gavin Newsom states the state is short on funds for Medi-Cal, even after expanding the program to cover undocumented immigrants. The governor requested lawmakers approve $2.8 billion in loans, adding to the $3.4 billion loan issued the previous week. California is addressing a $6.2 billion Medi-Cal shortfall to maintain funding through June. Adjustments and changes are needed in the Medicaid system to balance the budget.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: California is poised to be if this proposal is, supported, the first state, in the country to achieve universal access to health coverage. So what does that mean? It means full scope Medi Cal, including long term care, IHSS, behavioral health to all low income Californians regardless of immigration status, regardless of their age, regardless of their immigration status. Full implementation will initiate January 2024. Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom says the state short on funds for its Medicaid program known as Medi Cal. The state expanded the program to cover undocumented immigrants. Governor asked lawmakers to approve another $2,800,000,000 in loans on top of a $3,400,000,000 loan issued last week. So California now making up a, $6,200,000,000 shortfall in Medi Cal funds, The money meant to keep the program properly funded through June. Speaker 0: The realities are the realities. You have to balance budgets. We balance our budget. Revenues holding up. I don't see anything significant along the lines of what some have asserted, But I do see the need to make adjustments and changes broadly in the Medicaid system.
Saved - March 28, 2025 at 10:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights about R. Dennis Kennedy, the founder of the National Diversity Council, who reportedly paid himself $450,000 a year for minimal work. In 2022, he and two executives claimed $3 million in "back pay," leading to the organization's bankruptcy. The board accused Kennedy of systematically looting the council by diverting its assets to a for-profit firm he controls. This situation raises serious questions about the integrity of DEI initiatives. I found the reporting on this matter to be quite revealing.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

The founder of the "National Diversity Council," R. Dennis Kennedy, paid himself $450,000/year for 10 hours of work a week. Then, in 2022, at the peak of DEI mania, he and two other executives decided they were owed $3 million in "back pay" and looted the organization. Now, the organization is filing for bankruptcy, with the board saying Kennedy systematically looted it by funneling its assets to a for-profit firm controlled by himself. DEI has always been a scam. Amazing reporting by @lukerosiak https://www.dailywire.com/news/national-diversity-council-files-for-bankruptcy-says-top-employees-stole-millions

National Diversity Council Files For Bankruptcy, Says Top Employees Stole Millions The National Diversity Council filed for bankruptcy March 17 after its board said in a lawsuit that its founder, R. Dennis Kennedy, “improperly paid himself millions of dollars from NDC’s donor funds.” dailywire.com
Saved - March 26, 2025 at 9:25 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

🚨BREAKING UPDATE: Collin County, Texas has made the arrest public. The attacker has been charged with multiple felonies and is identified as an Asian MALE named Liam Thanh Tam Nguyen. More trans violence. https://apps2.collincountytx.gov/JudicialOnlineSearch2/inmate/c7924d1d-8b78-4ea9-99e2-4256db6827f5 https://t.co/Fs6mNhuixl

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

🚨UPDATE: UTD Campus PD has just contacted our chapter leadership and confirmed that the attacker has been arrested and placed in jail.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

JUST IN — Our Chapter President, Paige Neumann, and her secretary Grace were just assaulted while tabling at the University of Texas at Dallas. The attacker took a metal bike lock and slammed it against Paige's head (pictured below), hitting her so hard that it completely

Saved - March 26, 2025 at 1:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Our Chapter President, Paige Neumann, and her secretary Grace were assaulted while tabling at the University of Texas at Dallas. The attacker used a metal bike lock to strike Paige, shattering her phone. We don’t know the perpetrator's identity yet. Paige has filed a police report, and the University Police are actively investigating. Thankfully, both Paige and Grace are physically okay despite the incident. I'm proud of our @TPUSA students for their bravery and resilience on college campuses.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

JUST IN — Our Chapter President, Paige Neumann, and her secretary Grace were just assaulted while tabling at the University of Texas at Dallas. The attacker took a metal bike lock and slammed it against Paige's head (pictured below), hitting her so hard that it completely shattered Paige's phone. It's unclear if the perpetrator is female or trans. Paige has filed a police report with University Police who are thankfully taking this matter seriously and are currently searching for the individual. Thankfully, Paige and her chapter VP Grace (whose phone was also destroyed) are both physically doing okay. Our @TPUSA students are the tip of the spear on college campuses across the country. They are brave, strong, and resilient. Thank God for these amazing students.

Saved - March 25, 2025 at 10:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I urge Democrats to heed the voices of AOC, Bernie Sanders, and Elie Mystal and move further left. I see the contradiction in fighting the oligarchy while accepting donations from wealthy individuals. I question the push for eliminating voter registration laws and prioritizing illegal immigrants over American citizens. I oppose the inclusion of men in women's sports and the vandalism of Teslas owned by fellow Democrats. The policies that have led to significant population losses in states like California, Illinois, and New York should prompt a reevaluation. Keep swerving left; we’ll handle the consequences.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Dear Democrats, Please listen to AOC, Bernie Sanders, and Elie Mystal. Please go further left. Please keep claiming to "fight the oligarchy" while taking checks from George Soros, Marc Benioff, Laurene Powell Jobs, and Reid Hoffman. Please keep advocating for the elimination of all voter registration laws. Please keep fighting for illegals over Americans. Please keep pushing men in women's sports. Please keep cheering for the vandalism of Democrat voters' Teslas. Please keep pushing the same policies that led to a net loss of 268,000 California residents, 93,000 Illinois residents, and 179,000 New York residents — in 2023 alone! Please keep swerving radically left. We'll take it from here.

Saved - March 21, 2025 at 10:18 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

The fake news doesn't want you to see this clip. President Trump just said he will pay the two stranded astronauts overtime pay for the 286 days that they were stuck in space — out of his own pocket. Amazing. https://t.co/1Tm9KEGRFz

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that the two astronauts who were saved from space received only $5 a day per diem for 286 days, totaling $1,430 in extra pay. When asked if the administration can do anything to compensate them fully, the speaker says this is the first time they are hearing about it. The speaker offers to personally pay the difference out of their own pocket if necessary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The the two astronauts that you just helped save from space, they didn't get any overtime pay for all that extra time. They got $5 a day per diem for two hundred eighty six days. That is $1,430 in extra pay. Is there anything the administration can do to get them to make them whole? Well, nobody's ever mentioned this to me. If I have to, I'll pay that in my own pocket. Okay? I'll get it.
Saved - March 19, 2025 at 2:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A district court judge has ordered the US military to keep enlisting mentally delusional transgender troops, citing Hamilton to justify her ruling. I believe we either have a presidency or are ruled by 677 gavel-wielding dictators, and the Supreme Court needs to address this.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

Now, a district court judge ordering the US military to continue enlisting mentally delusional transgender troops is justifying her ruling by quoting the musical Hamilton. We either have a presidency or we have a rule by 677 gavel-wielding dictators. The Supreme Court must put these judges in place.

Saved - March 13, 2025 at 12:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently learned that over half of Columbia University's enrollment consists of foreign students, including individuals like Mahmoud Khalil, who has supported Hamas. Digging deeper, I found that Columbia is admitting many foreign students in fields like computer science and engineering primarily for the tuition revenue, which boosts their finances but impacts the American job market and wages for STEM workers. Many Columbia alumni are expressing concerns about these changes and the university's direction.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

It's not widely known, but over HALF of Columba University's enrollment is now foreign students. Some of them are people like Mahmoud Khalil, who spent all his time agitating in support of Hamas terrorists. But if you dig deeper, the true story is even more appalling: Columbia is using the prestige of its elite undergraduate school to bring in thousands of mediocre foreigners who want a Columbia degree in computer science, engineering, or a similar field. Columbia admits them because they pay full-freight tuition, boosting their bottom line while glutting the American job market and lowering wages for STEM workers. Why are we letting one of America's premier universities become overwhelmingly foreign in order to fund bloated administrator paychecks? Don't take it from me, the internet is full of Columbia grads complaining about what's happened to their school: https://www.reddit.com/r/MSCS/comments/1awxtmj/a_warning_to_columbia_applicants_from_current/ https://www.reddit.com/r/columbia/comments/d4kf4x/serious_question_why_is_7080_of_the_columbia/

Video Transcript AI Summary
A large portion of Columbia's students are international and pay full tuition, which brings up a couple of questions. Why are American taxpayers funding the education of non-Americans, especially after reports of significant federal grant reductions? Also, what is the real direction of our cultural exchange? Harvard recently froze hiring, which is interesting considering where federal grants are usually allocated. The professors who are most vocal in supporting protests and opposing the administration are not the ones who will be affected by Trump pulling grant funding. This could create internal conflict within universities between researchers who just want to focus on their work and those who are willing to fight the administration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over half of Columbia's enrollment is foreign students, and they're the ones, of course, who who pay full tuition. Yeah. And so of of the general studies Yeah. Student population. And and that raises two questions. One, why is the American taxpayer the free press reported that, you know, $400,000,000 in federal grants have been yanked? Why are American taxpayers paying to educate people who aren't Americans? And two, it raises this question about immigration and which way the cultural exchange is going. Mhmm. So the other day, two days ago, I do believe. Right? This is Wednesday. So I think on Monday, Harvard froze hiring. Mhmm. What what do you make of that? How do you read that? You know, it's interesting because a lot of these federal grants go to the hard sciences. So the professors who are supporting the protesters, supporting, you know, BDS resolutions saying, you know, screw it to the administration, they're not the ones who are gonna get pinched by the fact that Trump is pulling, grant funding. So you're gonna see a civil war within the universities of the the serious Yeah. Researchers saying, hey. We just wanna do our research. We don't wanna get, you know, in this, you know, fight with the administration over this versus the ones who say, no. This is this is the hill we're gonna die on. Okay.
From the MSCS community on Reddit 259 votes, 82 comments. I lurk this subreddit a lot as a barometer for the CS job market in the US, but I'm noticing a persistent trend in… reddit.com
From the columbia community on Reddit 31 votes, 17 comments. 43K subscribers in the columbia community. The unofficial subreddit of Columbia University and the Morningside Heights… reddit.com
Saved - March 5, 2025 at 3:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Supreme Court has ordered President Trump to unfreeze $1.9 billion in foreign USAID payments, which I find unbelievable. Justice Samuel Alito strongly criticized the majority decision, joined by Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh in dissent. He questioned whether a single district-court judge, who may not have jurisdiction, should have the power to compel the government to pay out such a significant amount of taxpayer dollars, expressing his astonishment at the majority's stance.

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

BREAKING: The Supreme Court has ruled that President Trump must unfreeze $1.9 billion in foreign USAID payments. Unbelievable. Justice Samuel Alito BLASTS the majority with Justices Thomas, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh joining in dissent: "Does a single district-court judge who likely lacks jurisdiction have the unchecked power to compel the Government of the United States to pay out (and probably lose forever) 2 billion taxpayer dollars? The answer to that question should be an emphatic “No,” but a majority of this Court apparently thinks otherwise. I am stunned."

View Full Interactive Feed