TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @cirnosad
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
A satanic religion based on sacrificing children and worshiping donkeys, later merged with an animist religion based on eating human beings in order to obtain their "power" and memories. Today these two combined faiths rule the planet and have corrupted all other religions.
@Parodyjeffx - Parody Jeff
I was lurking inside some Israeli Reddit groups discussing the Third Temple. During Purim, many of them were posting images like this. What could it mean? https://t.co/DSyj0WSfNL
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
We told you the released Epstein files were the tip of the ice berg. They were killing, r*ping, abusing and EATING children and babies. They cut people in half, they sometimes beheaded babies, then they projected it all on Iran. Operation Epstein Fury.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
OH MY GOD EVERYONE JEFFREY EPSTEIN ADMITS HE IS A NEANDERTHAL IN THE EMAILS. https://t.co/y3XNfrcDco
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
This was the big news I had to confirm. The battle plan was already approved. It was just a matter of reaching that rung on the escalation ladder. This is armageddon. The beginning of the end of the world as you know it.
@colonelhomsi - Geo_monitor
Iran is raising the stake! American energy giants in the region have been declared legitimate military targets! https://t.co/SEGBqXjc90
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Just watch and you'll see what I mean. :)
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Iran: We will now destroy all Mossad and US intelligence assets across the middle east.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Hello??? Palantir???
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Hey @grok remove the fed from the photo https://t.co/8lHiRUfzOg
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
History is made: Fine structure mystery solved? /𧡠UPDATE: My model may have solved an outstanding question in physics: the origin of the fine structure constant. I found a robust source and it works even with some tuning within -3% to 7% over a massive range of non-linear fields. What is the fine structure constant? Watch the video below and you'll find out. Essentially its a mysterious constant that occurs in atomic and subatomic physics that has no unit. Countless people have tried to find a reason for it, and most have turned to numerology. I did something that only could work in this age of LLMs and someone who is a motivated expert in the field. Did a massive paper search, found the material in 10 minutes, aligned everything, then had it double check for me. Note that I wasn't looking for it. It occurred to me by accident when I was developing my bilinear principle of electromagnetic interaction. Within an hour, I had a value for it. My idea was simple: apply my non-linear soliton model to the electron in a way that makes my current x current interaction make sense not just at the atomic level but the subatomic level. Look at E = mc^2. It's the same as E = (sqrt(m) c)(sqrt(m) c). If sqrt(m) could be scaled to a charge, then you could interpret it as two scaled currents multiplying against each other. This is almost identical to the equation for the energy contained within an inductor L with a current I running through it: E = 0.5 L I^2. So far, sketchy right? Here's the thing, vortexes are solitons and they can exist in superfluids -- they even have quantised "Noether charge". They acquire a mass from their vorticity, have an energy associated with them and can move at any speed inside the medium with a different speed. Exactly like electrons! So my idea was to map the electron exactly to these vortices. If I could predict the mass of the electron, I could actually finally connect mass to electromagentism properly (Planck's argument is elegant but indirect). I used dimensional analysis to do this. It took a few tries to get it right and I had it checked by 10 different instances of the highest powered LLMs. With this first order approximation I got within 1/4th of the mass. It was almost exactly 1/4th... so I realised, I had to use a double cover to make it like SU(2). After another half an hour of research, I felt confident in using something like Dirac's scissor to do it. A kind of knot within the electron. It got me within 1.2% of the mass of the electron... but there was a problem, the mass of the electron occurred on the other side of the equation. I cringed at myself. Such an amateur mistake, I thought. But the LLM (Opus 4.5) actually corrected me and told me I had just accidentally derived the fine structure constant. Why? Because the mass terms cancelled out, or if one prefers, leave behind a correction ratio. Set that correction ratio and you get a function that implicitly defines the fine structure constant through two "parameters": 1. The actual geometry of the soliton/vortex. 2. The non-linearity of the medium and how it changed the vortex core. I went back and found an equation from friggin' Lord Kelvin, derived in the Victorian era. I then found an analysis from 1970 on the Non-linear Schrodinger Equation (NLSE) applied to exactly this domain but for a larger scale soliton in superfluids -- it didn't matter though because a superfluid and the medium of space are scale free as I had proven in the superconduction part of my paper. In any case plugging these two approximation in got me within 1.2% of the fine structure constant by solving the following implicit equation: 1 = 8 * pi * alpha (Log_e(8/alpha) - alpha_core) Where alpha_core is 1.615 in the NLSE. The most incredible thing? It was a ROBUST value for thin ring vortices. Even if you adjusted the alpha_core from 1.5-2, the values for the fine structure constant only changed between -3% to +7%. I cannot emphasise how incredible this result is -- it means that the actual non-linear equation and the other candidate geometries that reproduce SU(2) can actually get the exact value of the fine structure constant. I don't know of anyone who even approached this problem in this way without making ansatz or postulates. I'm still checking through the math in disbelief. If it's wrong it's going to be beautifully wrong. All LLMs I've ran it through agree with the math, just not the foundations which is expected due to their QED bias. This will be in chapter 11 of my paper. I've already sketched out the full derivation. This SIGNIFICANTLY strengthens an already game changing paper. I promise it'll be the last discovery I include and thank you for your patience. I wrote this full update out because of the significance of this development. Details will be in the paper, even if there was a mistake (it'll be shuffled on its own into the appendix -- but I really hope it all checks out). ππ₯° /End
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Out of no where some British propagandist labelled Poseidon a 2MT warhead. HAHAHA the cope. 𧡠Publicly, it carries a 200MT warhead, a three-stage nuclear bomb boosted to the limit of its weight. The torpedo itself weights 100 tons. Compact warhead in the 1.2 MT range is 332kg. https://t.co/DOP99xpugz
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
What do nuclear weapons SOUND like? The short answer is a gunshot (akin to a shotgun), followed by a turbulent roar. Here is a rare, captured example from the Upshot-Knothole Annie test, 1953. This thread will explain why nukes sounds like gunshots & why regular bombs don't! /π§΅
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Just in case there is any doubt, the media agrees: In an article posted by the Atlantic "The Sound of an Atomic Bomb", the audio is described in this manner: "The boom is more like a shotgun than a thunderclap, and itβs followed by a sustained roar." https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/08/what-does-an-atomic-bomb-sound-like-when-it-explodes/536283/
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
We are lucky to have this footage, thanks to fears of nuclear bombs at the time which resulted in civilian reporters taking this very rare video. Actually no one was really interested in the sound of a nuke -- scientists considered the question obvious! https://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2012/07/13/the-sound-of-the-bomb-1953/
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Yet, to this day we get audio like this: A screaming lady sound followed by what sounds like the most noisy and loud jet sound ever. The notion of this is absurd if you understand how nukes work! More importantly, this false ideal can obstruct classification of explosions! https://t.co/wCwruJ28pn
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Detection of nuclear explosions is actually not as straight-forward as its made out to be, an analyst must make a human decision based on multiple sources of data. Acoustic detection of nuclear explosion is one such method employed, using "infrasound" detectors. Let's explore: https://t.co/hfwf1TwOen
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Infrasounds are sounds with frequencies below our range of hearing 20 Hertz or below. Why do nuclear detectors aim to measure this range? Well, they have to cover a long distance and sound at higher frequencies is absorbed more readily by air than that at lower frequencies. https://t.co/QeNWCmCXkZ
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
For those with some technical background, we can roughly say that air acts similarly to a single pole low-pass filter at moderate levels of humidity. That is to say, higher frequencies are rapidly muted: e.g. a 8000Hz sound is absorbed 100x more over a distance than 100Hz.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
The longer the distance travelled by a sound, the more energy within the wave is absorbed by the air! When a component of sound is absorbed to the point where it is below your dynamic threshold of hearing (i.e. above the noise level of what is around you), it becomes inaudible.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
If you've ever been near a house party, where the sound gets absorbed by walls (which emulates long travel through the air). you can immediately relate to this effect. You can only hear the thumping bass and not the rich treble making the experience annoying if you're a neighbor. https://t.co/LWl8vAk97L
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Let's move back to detonation of nukes now, focusing on air burst. I described the operation of nuclear bombs extensively in this thread: https://t.co/1QqTGocrDU
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
PHYS003: Fission bomb design & history In this short thread, we're going to learn about "critical mass", timing circuits and with them, we'll combine what we learn in PHYS001 & PHYS002 to learn how the ultimate weapon was created: The nuclear bomb! Let's discuss how it works too! https://t.co/qff9vrr0I7
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Modelling the sound a nuclear bomb emits is not an easy task. But we can use some tricks. This video was shot during the Trinity test, which captures the moment the physics package overcomes the pressure of the explosive lens and the casing of the nuclear bomb. Note the symmetry. https://t.co/06cAxGuplO
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
The video was shot at a rate of around 10 nanoseconds per shot. When the fireball forms, it can be modelled by a sphere. This is an extremely convenient shape -- but we must note that internally it has a great deal of turbulence. The strange "spikes" are caused by irregularities. https://t.co/nsZBCiq7SW
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
The initial plasma, formed by xray absorption in the air/casing, is extremely hot, 100 million Kelvin -- 4-5 times hotter than the atmosphere of the sun. The air around it is immediately turned into a plasma as well, expanding VERY rapidly. This displaces a greater sphere of air. https://t.co/KYFptArD3w
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
This displacement happens extremely quickly. Imagine a rock in a puddle and observing the wave. This is kind of what happens when you create a plasma ball -- the air pressure pushes it in and keeps it from escaping to space, but it also pushes on the air creating the wave.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
In fact, for an atmospheric explosion, 50-60% of the energy goes into formation of this blast or shockwave. It is in fact a sound wave! That's right, air burst mode nuclear weapon's primary destructive power is sound, unlike conventional bombs which use fragmentation. https://t.co/5NMzYRJF1I
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
So all that energy goes into creating a "pulse". If we use radial coordinates, due to the spherical symmetry we model this nuke at, this "pulse" is generated exactly around the shape of the initial plasma ball prior to expansion, which moves meters over the course of nanoseconds. https://t.co/w6xeQPVQWf
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Let's look at a modern nuclear bomb, most likely to be used against Russia in the coming months: The W80-Mod4. You can see how small this thing is, less than 50 centimeters. In a matter of nanoseconds, this will expand to 250 meters or more depending on the yield. https://t.co/1eKqO9Cnwb
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Given the spherical symmetry, we can cheat a little bit, we can go into negative time and create a shockwave that is compressed with all the energy in what is called a Dirac Delta. In the frequency spectrum, this simply means all audible frequencies have the same frequency! https://t.co/ZYPxZuS64X
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
How does this pulse move? Well, forwards and at the speed of sound in both directions of course, but let's make life simple and only consider the incoming direction. How are the frequencies adjusted? Well, we already know: the higher frequencies lose the most energy.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
But as this energy is so immense (50% of the power of the bomb) and as this pulse is so tight that it forms a shockwave, the sound remains a pulse, with most of the components of the audible frequencies still above the noise level. Well you would hope, too close and you're dead!
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
This is of course in the ideal scenario! In most cases, there will be variations in the atmosphere and also along the ground (such as hills, buildings and so on) that create a complex path that is difficult to analyse without a simulation: But this pulse remains a key signature.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
What does a small and short pulse that contains a lot of energy, followed by some turbulence due to irregularities and non-linearity sound like? A shotgun. In fact, by using Schlieren photography we can visual the convolved Dirac delta pulse AND the turbulence in this case: https://t.co/nm1gXx11k5
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Let's investigate a suspected nuclear blast. This one is from Southern Lebanon, carried out by an Israeli jet. We can hear the jet prior to the sound, which is a gunshot followed by some turbulence. We can even see the shockwave, which reaches high into the sky then the camera. https://t.co/brNNoHuqyy
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Putting this video into a professional audio editor we can see how SHARP this shockwave is, and how it fills all the frequencies that the camera mic can capture, dropping off sharply at its max input frequency of 15kHz. But herein lies an important detail! Look at the slope! https://t.co/0YOTeYUKw0
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Close examination shows a 34dB drop in power. This is approximately similar to the air propagation constant we detected earlier, considering a propagation of 1.9km by sound delay. Inverting this, we can reconstruct the source: Fairly flat across frequencies! A Dirac Delta! β’οΈπ¨ https://t.co/OGK9ujYaQ6
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Note that, of course, sounds other than a nuke can produce a Dirac delta, but when we consider the intense and sustained light, as well as other evidence such as the Rayleigh-Taylor instability observed, and the lack of anything else that could possibly cause this, it is a nuke.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Next up, let's take a look at a conventional explosion and why it doesn't sound the same as a gunshot, and more like a drum. I wrote all about conventional bombs in this thread, which would make a useful reference for all readers: https://t.co/xoVEPsB3eG
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
PHYS002: Bomb design/Super-basic thermodynamics In this short thread, we're going to take a step back from nuclear weapon design to look at conventional bombs. You'll appreciate the engineering challenges facing designers and how they optimize the devices. Let's go! https://t.co/8wvSWPMn7I
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
A well designed bomb usually has symmetrical or central primers, so that the detonation wave inside the bomb occurs from both ends and is symmetrical as possible. This creates a deadly shockwave and a complete detonation which sends destructive fragments flying into the air. https://t.co/rLqTH3uld0
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Nevertheless, no matter how symmetric the conventional bomb is, this speed of detonation is actually quite slow, to the point where the bomb, when it hits the ground, spreads outwards rather than vertically. It also has far less energy than a nuke. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiZTGHU3KkU
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
So what you have is still a somewhat oblong shockwave, moving at the same speed, but after 2 kilometres of propagation, the energy contained in the higher frequencies will be below the threshold of detection and hearing. This makes it exactly like the party in another room! https://t.co/huSUmp6Hg4
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Because of the oblong shape, and extent of the bomb as well as the slow detonation velocity, this sound is extended and is not approximated well by a Dirac pulse, but more of a Sinc function. In essence, it means the sound will be way more bassy and have less treble components. https://t.co/4MpJ7ZkCuM
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Do you know who Chabad are and how they're linked to the Charlie Kirk assassination? And how is this linked to Jeffery Epstein? Let's start with the history of large Jewish pan-political organizations! History Chabad is actually an acronym that stands for Wisdom/Understanding/Knowledge whose philosophical underpinnings stem from the 18th century. This acronym is commonly attached to Lubavitch, a place in Belarus where it was based in for a long time. Chabad was an early off-shoot Hasidic movement found by Baal Shem Tov ("master of the good name") that believed its leader Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson was the Messiah, even after he died in 1994. Like all Hassidic movements, it started out as an anti-Zionist movement but gradually lost its direction and became fully Zionist to its core. Initially, Chabad was only an "out-reach" organization, making links with everyone while seemingly apolitical on the surface. This was true inside and outside Israel, until it wasn't and Chabad linked up with the Likud party. This put it in competition with Bnai Braith, the oldest Jewish organization in the world and the controlling party of the World Jewish Congress. Bnai Braith is also responsible for organizations like the ADL. Here's where things get interesting. Netanyahu, a psychopathic secular Zionist, eventually had to link up with Chabad to survive politically, and this metastasized into what one Israeli told me was the "Armageddon coalition" back in the mid-2010s. This was fully realized later in 2021, but it was thrust into view with Trump's election in 2016. By 2019, Netanyahu was struggling in Israel. The election was close and he needed something against the blue and white party headed by Benny Gantz. Towards that end, Trump had Jeffrey Epstein arrested. Epstein was a B'nai B'rith linked agent with business links to Ehud Barak who visited him very often between 2013-2017. Epstein was a blackmail agent and most likely linked to Mossad, but it's foolish to assume there are no political divisions within that organization. His arrest was a move by Chabad against Bnai Braith, but also one that was meant to boost Netanyahu. It was never meant to harm Israel but harm the "left wing" within the US and by extension, within Israel. it didn't work, at least not initially. Netanyahu lost the election by a very narrow margin and couldn't form a government. Trump paid the price when the Bnai Braith organizations fought back, put Biden in power. Remember how the left-wing media jumped up and down about Trump having "connections to Russia". This was just a proxy to say he was controlled by Chabad and he was indeed controlled by them, after being a key player who betrayed Bnai Braith and his old friend Jeffrey Epstein. Then, for a few years, no one spoke of Jeffrey Epstein... It was only when Netanyahu solidified his power in December 2022 and put his Armageddon coalition into office, in the wake of the war in Ukraine and the reality around Israel in the middle east, that Chabad regained control. By October 7th, 2023, it was Chabad or bust, Israel's sick society was completely dependent on Netanyahu's success. So up until this point what seemed like a schizophrenic internal schism within the US was really just a struggle between two Jewish organizations vying for power -- and the younger organization, Chabad, won. Chabad now controls Israel, the US and Russia, through its large "out reach" network and the blackmail it now controls thanks to Epstein's arrest. Charlie Kirk's fatal mistake Charlie Kirk was so deeply associated with Chabad that a rabbi called him "the Abraham of our time". Indeed, Ben Shapiro who was largely his handler at the beginning (and Nick Fuentes' hero by the way), is the "child prodigy" of Chabad. A brilliant, somewhat charming violinist and a genocidal psychopath to boot! You don't simply change your position among those who raised you up without facing their ire. No, at that point it becomes such a deep betrayal that you've essentially INSULTED their very existence. Just think of it from their perspective, imagine biting the very hand that fed you from the beginning. I wouldn't do it -- but then, I also would never work* for a Jewish mafia like Chabad. Charlie Kirk made a fatal mistake by insisting that the Jeffrey Epstein files be made available to the public. Why you might ask? Doesn't Chabad hate Bnai Braith? They're rivals, not enemies -- Israel's well being always comes first. Epstein's files and with it, all his blackmail, is no longer something Bnai Braith can hold onto exclusively. It now has to share it with Chabad, diluting its power. If Jeffrey Epstein's files were to be made public, then that dilution of power would extend to the entire public! That means the end of Judeosatanic control over the United States. How would that help EITHER organization? What was Charlie Kirk thinking? He was thinking of America first, that's what. He was thinking of whites first, Christianity first. That's why Laura Loomer lashed out like psychopath calling him a traitor. And he was a traitor, to Chabad. An organization cannot survive treachery, especially public treachery -- traitors must always meet their end in a manner that deters others from joining in. And a public execution and blood sacrifice, on the altar of Chabad, painted as a random assassination by a "left winger" is exactly what was needed to teach people like Charlie a lesson. As they say, strike the Shepard and the sheep will flee. Now, at least for the next phase, the Bnai Braith left-fronting organization is not required. What's needed is white people's compliance with Jewish priorities. That priority is fighting and dying in a nuclear war against "Islam". Once Chabad's role is fulfilled, it will step into the background and allow Bnai Braith to finish off what is left of the white species using the very same machinations that some will cheer on as a justification for this sacrifice. AI monitoring. Social media censorship. Inter-ethnic conflicts that only benefit Jewish people. Drafting the youth. And the activating event, an inevitable false flag. All the pent up hatred to the oppression that whites have felt over the last few decades since Obama took power will be redirected against Iran, Pakistan and so on. Then, when they're done just like after the global war on terror (with Obama popping up just after Bush), the pendulum will swing back to finish off what remains of us... ...But only if we let them, and only if we let traitors amongst us lead us to this horrible conclusion. Bonus section: Miscellaneous Symbolism and A Question Chabad of Utah County happens to be near UVU. Chabad has a specific "gang sign" the straight-branched Menorah. The same Chabad sign was raised over DC when Trump was in power during his first term. Trump prayed for the "Messiah" of Chabad before taking power and after surviving an assassination attempt. Now the question, which I don't offer an answer to but might force you to think more deeply about the connections and relations I explained here: Who ordered the hit on Trump? /End Note: If you think symbolism isn't important you should never discuss politics ever again. * Admittedly, I have worked and still work with far more parasitic and evil organizations, but only on a salary, my own merit, never through favors.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
It's quite interesting that these events happened seemingly days between each other: /π - Thomas Sewell was arrested under trumped up charges 2 weeks ago. - Some American streamers interfere with Australian politics and defame Thomas Sewell and Joel Davis on their stream for seemingly no reason? Joel Davis is deeply involved in Australian nationalism and has become a respected figure among the "deep right". - Israel assassinated the Yemeni PM - Israel tried to assassinate Hamas leadership in Qatar - Robert Shillman pulled funding out of Charlie Kirk's TP USA - Nick Fuentes was covered by the NYT out of the blue. - Next day, Israel assassinated Charlie Kirk - Robert Shillman's zionist shill Tommy Robinson carried out a massive demonstration in England trying to swallow up nationalism and taint it with Israelism. - Internet concludes Israel killed Charlie Kirk. - Suddenly Groypers are attacked by the leftwing media, seemingly wanting to pin Charlie Kirk's death on them. - Mark Levin comes out with threats - Suddenly everyone with a name attached to their accounts backs down and then EXONERATES Israel forcefully. - Evidence continues to come out, but some on the right are deliberately attaching the position to the left to remove it as a unifying hook. - Australia's flag march is being subverted by Jewish and brown people away from its ethnic (white) roots. - Iran is being forced to leave the NPT. - There are seemingly on-going preparation for a massive false flag. - Israel just announced it wants to completely destroy Iran. - The greatest mass of white people, Europe, is being put on an altar of sacrifice between the Jewish controlled Ukrainians/NATO and the Jewish controlled Kremlin, puppeted by the Jewish controlled EU. - US as a whole is now a failed state, meaning any war would tip it over to a civil war, where white people have the lowest birthrates of all time. It's clear to me what's going on. Israel is going to temporarily suppress the left which has opposed it due to the genocide of Gaza, and inflate the right, use it to destroy Iran and fight one last war for it, then extinguish white people as a whole. Whoever goes along with this is a traitor that will face justice once we win. And no matter how bad it looks, I promise we will win. /End
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Ben Shapiro has just taken over the Turning Point USA organisation that Charlie Kirk started. And there you have it, the real motive behind Israel's assassination of Charlie Kirk. https://t.co/3UhhSFT4zN
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Quote: "I'll pick up Charlie's mic and continue his work" - Ben Shapiro
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Correction: *bloody mic Shapiro is Jewish and hates Jesus Christ as a result Charlie Kirk loved Jesus Christ
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Original source: https://t.co/LuICCR9XQ7
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
@FaithWorksDaily @grok He said he was going on college campuses... replacing Charlie Kirk
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
@AFNickfclips Do I know you? Please read the follow up tweets https://t.co/7mloV2iJYB
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
@elliev25x Just watch, heβs stated his intent
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
@translator71 @grok He said heβs going to pick up his bloody microphone and replace him.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
@TheNewsProfesor @CommunityNotes He said he's "picking up his bloodied microphone"
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
@BigMoonKR Do you seriously think this is the first time I've ever come by this information?
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
@veldamayellis2 I agree wholeheartedly
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
@Grayzmatter https://t.co/vDTZ1nYp35
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
@DYTRDR1 Will do.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
@DrSlimeZ Why not try following me and find out?
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
@petrmares2 Check the thread mate
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
@TravMyG3D Check the thread, please donβt give me a headache man
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
The Apocalypse: Discarding Enlightenment's Veil /𧡠The most dangerous form of deception is inception. The type you are not even aware of and take for granted so deeply that it forms the very lens in which you see the entire world. An idea planted so deeply in everything you read and think about that it becomes like a mind parasite that consumes the energy of every thought and formation of intuition. Worse yet, is the denial of any possible mediation as a priori -- that is, the complete disembodiment of being, at multiple levels. I suppose it's important that I start with a concrete example, something that is taken for granted so deeply by the majority of thinkers that it may appear insane to even question such an unassailable statement: "I think, therefore I am." (Cogito, ergo sum) - Descartes This statement is easy to digest for most people, but as I hope to make you see by the end of this thread, flips reality on its head. Reading this statement as a living person it contains true statements on both sides. You're surely "thinking" while reading this statement. You surely "are" while your vision (or hearing/feeling if blind) traces over each word. True, therefore true?... So it almost appears, as one reads it, a tautology. That isn't quite what Rene Descartes meant, he was going for something more abstract -- that you think at all means you are, independent of anything else. In fact, in rejection of everything possible, the ultimate atomised individuality. At a higher level, what this statement said is the following: Epistemology conditionally proves ontology. That is: the metaphysical is now conditional to its rational formulation. This is a sharp departure from Platonic forms, which exist in a transcendental realm independent of so-called rational thought. In a sense, Descartes in his "Meditations" captured everything in reality (including God, lol) and trapped them within his oddly shaped head. You see, the "cogito" statement itself is far bolder and less personal to the reader than it appears to the reader. The "I" is very much Descartes or anyone who chooses to deploy his theory. This formed what is termed Cartesian dualism: a "non-physical" indivisible mind ("res cogitans") and a completely mechanical physical body ("res extensa"). The former's existence, in the observer's mind, proves the existence of the latter, but this is later extended to everything. It is this theory we will initially dissect, destroy and later, invert entirely, arriving at a result that will surely surprise most people. One thing I want to point out is that if you are like me, you've probably never really even questioned this dual of the mind and body -- it has likely been drilled into you since birth. Perhaps the more religious of you refer to this mind as a soul? Did you know that there was an alternative that Descartes successfully killed for most people? Not only that, this alternative philosophy was so old and established that it is undateable. Older than Platonic forms. Yet, today, most have never heard of it despite it once reigning supreme. We'll return to this later in the thread, and with all we have learnt about reality with our recent findings and instruments, I believe it will form a true revelation. An apocalypse, in the proper revealing sense of the world rather than the popular sense of physical destruction. Now returning to the question of the so-called enlightenment, which I believe is the reverse of said apocalypse, Descartes, formed the philosophical pillar of the enlightenment. Almost every single modern philosopher you have heard of since him, has taken his dualism for granted, even as they defeated every other part of its formulation. This includes figures like: Spinoza (even adopting the framework from a monist perspective), Leibniz, Locke, Hume, Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Marx. Any philosophy, ethics or science built on the other's formulations will be irreparably tainted by the flaws that we will be attacking in this thread. All of today's dead society is built upon this idea, even your online social interactions! Interestingly, Nietzsche rejected the framework altogether and even predicted that someone would write this very thread you are reading, and yet still came to the same awful wrong conclusion his own way. Actually, the only* person to get things right was David Bohm, because he removed the veil himself in his book "Wholeness and the Implicate Order" (1980) -- but didn't synthesise the conclusion because he was a very gentle, cautious and serious man who didn't get to live to see the vindication of his theories. Unlike Descartes, Bohm was not only a philosopher but also a physicist. A man who wielded both ontology and epistemology. For reasons related to this, we are going to be forced to examine not only Descartes in this thread, but also the science pillar of the enlightenment. This other pillar was formed by Englishman Francis Bacon. Bacon worked in almost the opposite direction as Descartes but towards the same goal. For Bacon, reality is as follows: "It has been tested empirically, so I can build on it". Seems reasonable, right? In fact, you might say, it's even harder to argue against this than Descartes! We will quickly see how flawed empirical evaluation is, but there is one sleight of the hand you could miss in adopting both of these. Bacon restricts the scientist from thinking about philosophy, and Descartes restricts the philosopher from using their senses thus conducting science. A double severance at either end. Only through their institutions can knowledge be gained. This was the beginning of compartmentalisation. Meanwhile, both of them rejected everything that came before them -- Bacon going as far as using Abrahamist/Yahwehist symbolism, of smashing four different kinds of "idols". Descartes invoking a demiurge-like demon which steals his senses and ability to measure. When taken both together, their "enlightenment" leaves us in a collective amnesia and creates a dual: a scientist and a philosopher, one restricted to measurements and , and another trapped in his thoughts forever. Neither of whom have any connections to the "idols" of the past, smashed to bits by these two curious men. Descartes promised a utopia, as did Bacon in "New Atlantis", should their formula be followed. Bacon proposed "torturing" nature until it spilled the beans about the truth through empiricism. Descartes on the other hand, declared primacy of human consciousness, denying it to animals and instead deeming them mere machines or automata. This essentially severed our connection to nature, beyond just the past. Today, as humans are deemed "animals" too, we find ourselves under the same kind of harmful assertion. I will not stop at these two though, I will take you all the way to today in 2025. All the way to quantum mechanics, LLMs, discoveries about space, time, nature and beyond. The "enlightenment" was damaging, in fact, it gave birth to disastrous revolutions, dehumanisation, savage wars, absolute nihilism, destruction of faith for many and desolation in the form of the loneliness epidemic. You will quickly come to understand that these two men, or more accurately, those behind these two men, intended this exact outcome. But that's not what this thread is about. This thread is all about us achieving what they never could: the unveiling of reality. This cannot be done by myself alone! In fact, that's the entire point of this thread, as you will see, the unveiling is something that has to be done by the entire world, but it is precisely this moment that this unveiling is not only possible but inevitable. The unveiling is communication about this, about destroying each boundary and veil they have put up for us. We finally have the tools and knowledge to do it. If I do not write this thread, someone else shortly will! The hard work has already been done, arguably, thousands of years ago, by ancient philosophers, by Jesus Christ, by early Christians, by Bohm and many experimentalists, technologists today. For the latter though, this is not the singularity that the transhumanists wanted. π Instead, this will be, a restorative one that will most definitely awaken everyone from their collective amnesia once a critical threshold is crossed! The anti-thesis is our current dying society, there will be no synthesis in the Hegelian fashion, we will absolutely smash what they built and transcend it. Are you ready oomfies? If so sit back, relax, and enjoy this thread about philosophy, science and teleology -- purpose. * I will note that Heidegger, Whitehead and Merleau-Ponty rejected the Cartesian framework and worked beyond it. They came very very close to connecting epistemology (the how), ontology (the what) and teleology (the why) together, but missed some key results due to their lifetime window. If they were alive today, they would have been writing this thread instead of your Baka! May they rest in peace. β€οΈ
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Let us first immerse ourselves in Renaissance Europe to fully appreciate the scientific, philosophical, religious and ultimately political context which resulted in the veil over our eyes today. We begin in 1440, when the German inventor Johannes Gutenberg invented printing press. This device allowed new and old ideas could be propagated at great speed, enabling advancements in technology, literacy and even artistic pursuits. It was the social media of the time, but like every tool that could do good, it could also cause great harm! In the early 1500s, Martin Luther used the printing press to succeed where his predecessors failed, launching the protestant reformation and sinking Europe into chaos. The catholic church's normal methods of dealing with such "heretics" did not work, and in the aftermath the church became far more defensive and inflexible towards any challenge to its authority. In the meantime, the literacy rates across Europe skyrocketed, creating the perfect conditions for advancements in technology -- and the need for reading glasses. This meant lens making techniques would have to advance rapidly, creating a demand for optics books, which the printing press readily provided. These two technologies had a synergistic economy with each feeding demand for the other. One particular town in the Netherlands, Middelburg in the Zeeland province, became the centre of excellence for lens making. In 1608, this resulted in the invention of the telescope, which would finally put some cosmic assertions under the test. Two years later, Galileo would use this telescope to make a discovery that would change the course of history despite it being a very minor one in retrospect. To understand why, we have to take a little step back from technology and science, then step into the world of philosophy and theology. The catholic church's authority was coming under challenge, and its teleology through papacy undermined. The church, at the time, favoured the Aquinas scholasticism which was a more complex and purposeful method than the Hegelian dialectic most people today would be familiar with. At the time, Europe had largely adopted an Aristotelian metaphysical view, after much of his work was transmitted to the continent via the Moors of Spain. Aquinas developed the scholastic method by which opposing viewpoints can be reconciled, usually to reinforce the Catholic church's scriptural viewpoints, without contradicting the trends of the time. This became exceedingly difficult as more observations of the cosmos and nature became known. Yet, the church still preferred this gradual approach which protected teleology while ontology and epistemology flourished -- fulfilling the church's guardianship role. One particularly troublesome conflict was the 3rd century AD Ptolemaic model of our Solar system, inspired by Aristotle. In this Ptolemaic model, all the planets, stars and our current sun (Sol) orbited the Earth, with a twist! They all went through epicycles along their orbit, compensating for the motion of the Earth around the sun. It only takes a moment of consideration to find an issue with this model: Due to Mercury and Venus's closer proximity to the sun, their epicycles would have to overlap each other's and the moon's. This means that we should see "phase cycles" that the Ptolemaic model could not account for and these were only observable by the telescope! The Ptolemaic model which established the Earth as the centre of the universe with everything else orbiting, couldn't be right. Well before the telescope's invention, Copernicus had already worked this out by doing away with the epicycles altogether: This was not accepted however, and without any contradictory observations, people held on to existing views. Why would the church even care about this? As the Catholic church's (and almost every other mainstream sect) maintains that all its canon scripture was divinely inspired, these particular verses would create an obvious contradiction: Psalm 104:5 - "He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved." Psalm 93:1 - "The world is firmly established; it cannot be moved." Psalm 96:10 - "Say among the nations, 'The Lord reigns.' The world is firmly established, it cannot be moved." 1 Chronicles 16:30: "Tremble before him, all the earth! The world is firmly established; it cannot be moved." In 1610 Galileo made the inevitable observation of multiple phases of Venus, and quietly shared his empirical work in 1611. Jesuit astronomers took notice, and readily replicated the result. Cardinal Robert Bellarmine requested a formal opinion from the Collegio Romano mathematicians. They came up with the perfect solution that accommodated the church's requirements: Adopting the Tychonian model, nearly identical to an even older 4th century BC model by Heraclides*, where the Sun, Moon and stars orbit the Earth, and the planets orbit the Sun: Galileo published his Venus observations in 1611, but did not advocate for any particular view. He was someone who even taught the geocentric model, and it took him until 1613 to accept his own observations and begin to advocate for the heliocentric model. He wrote a letter to the Italian mathematician Benedetto Castelli where he made a very bold statement, that his empirical results took primacy over scripture -- and that the latter should only be a matter of faith. Just three years later, the church declared the heliocentric model, and Copernicus, heretical. Galileo was formally warned by the church, but continued to advocate for it in private and conduct research in this direction. In 1632, he published a work "Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems" which he set up as a scholastic argument, advocating for the geocentric model. In the book, dialogue took place between three fictional characters: Salviati (representing Galileo) Simplicio (the word resembling sempliciotto which means 'simpleton') And an observer, Sagredo. In the book, Salviati made amazing arguments, while Simplicio struggled. More corrosively, the Pope (Urban VIII), had made almost identical arguments to this character. To maintain plausible deniability, Sagredo would declare no winner at the end of the book. The Pope, who was so far quite lenient towards Galileo, felt rightfully betrayed by this mockery and straw-manning. Just six month later, Pope Urban VIII placed the book on a ban list, ordering a halt to its distribution. The printing presses complied, and even protestants did not like Galileo's actions. He was placed under house arrest shortly afterwards, and conducted some research on inertia which we will revisit later in the thread. Galileo was what you would call a scientist today, concerned with empirical observations more so than scriptural interpretation. He, like any nerd today, failed to read the room and paid the price for it. He didn't appreciate the complicated political, theological and societal considerations that the church had to balance. So he got cancelled for his trouble. A far more politically adept albeit destructively secretive observer, Rene Descartes, correctly read the room. He was writing a book (Le Monde) advocating heliocentrism, but immediately ceased work on it in light of Galileo's arrest. As this represented many years of his work, this surely left a very bitter taste in his mouth. After Galileo's arrest, Descartes saw the scholastic method along with theology in general, as a barrier to what he thought of as progress. A barrier that needed to be torn down along with the history and perhaps even the deity behind him. Descartes was Jesuit educated, and somewhat politically adept, but extremely hard to collaborate with and not a particularly good mathematician. Despite the fanfare over his various contributions, other than one polynomial curve, none of them were particularly new -- he just understood the correct way to publicise himself. As you will soon see, Descartes was indeed more of an influencer than either a mathematician or a philosopher. In his discussions with Fermat, he often misrepresented his work and stubbornly held onto his own inferior and sometimes incorrect assertions. Despite his lack of scholarly skills, his work would soon leave its mark on the world -- creating nightmares beyond our imagination while inducing amnesia upon the Earth. Next up, let's dive into his "philosophical" works, being careful not to make the mistake of engaging with his theatre and as you will soon discover, the dark ritual he imposed on his readers. * Heraclides had Mercury and Venus orbit the Sun, the Sun orbit the Earth, and everything else including the Sun orbit the Earth with epicycles.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Though Philosophy was popular during the Renaissance, it is not the most popular degree that people pursue today. In the US out of 2 million graduates per year, only 8,000 of them study philosophy and only half of these do it as an only major. That's only 0.4% of all graduating students! Despite this, philosophy degrees and focused courses are over-represented in the following roles: - Senior Intelligence Analysts/Leaders (>4%) - CEOs (2%) - Lawyers, as a double major (9%) - Clergy (8%) Among names you may be familiar with who studied philosophy: Bill Clinton, Emmanuel Macron, Pierre Trudeau, Peter Thiel, Carl Icahn the "activist investor", John O. Brennan (CIA director), William J. Casey (CIA Director), Richard Moore (MI6 director). The Oxford PPE course, which has a core philosophy component, also produced numerous leaders such as David Cameron, Liz Truss, Rishi Sunak, Bob Hawke***, Malcolm Fraser and Tony Abbott to name a few. In addition to these individuals, the institutionalisation of philosophy for interior government roles is very significant. Georgetown school of Foreign Service and other Jesuit institutions are practically a direct pipeline to the CIA and other intelligence or governmental organisations. All base their course work on philosophies borne out of one man: Rene Descartes.* Yet, this is merely the direct influence of this man. His Meditation on First Philosophy book published in 1641, influenced the course of the Renaissance itself, almost all philosophical works after him, and later in the 20th century, the very root of physics. The flow-on effects from his philosophy touches almost every single aspect of modern life. From science, policy and even entertainment, the psychology of those who adopted it will naturally also affect your life as well. Yet, except for these philosophy students, hardly anyone is familiar with the work that inspired these consequent developments. Even among these students, as they receive Descartes typically as a 4 week component of their first year course work, they typically do not gain much more than the absorption of today's interpretation of his work. They rarely look at the history of the man, the context in which he wrote his work, his true character and the ancient influences of his work. They mostly know him for Cartesian Geometry, without understanding what it is or what his true contribution to it was. You probably know where I'm going with this: we are going to fix this severe deficiency in this thread, and become familiar with the man, his work, his true capabilities, what influenced him and the true state of his psychology. What will we gain? There is a two fold gain: - By understanding the man who created the philosophy that major leaders adopt without question, we understand them at a deeper level than they possibly understand themselves. - By understanding the man AND his philosophy, we can begin to unravel it, not merely to build upon it, but to completely strip it of its mystery. Then we are going to deconstruct using ancient epistemology and essentially invert it using modern ontological observations. Basically, we are going to tear it to bits. Taken together, this makes the leaders of this world far more predictable to us: for example, their collective desire of transhumanism (especially Peter Thiel's) will soon become not only childish but also rather boring. It will also help us understand the two pronged attack on knowledge, observational methodologies and ultimately teleology, launched by the masters of the "enlightenment". I dare say, we will not be able to do this without knowing the man himself, so we shall begin with this. Rene Descartes was born in 1596, in La Haye en Touraine, France. His father, Joachim Descartes, was an influencial member of parliament. Unfortunately for Rene, he was born to two tragedies. His mother passed soon after his birth, leaving him spiritually alone and without the irreplaceable love of a mother that defines the very being of a man. To make matters worse, he inherited her persistent cough and frail constitution, making him very prone to illnesses. Indeed, his doctors predicted he would never make it to adulthood. This left Descartes bed ridden, he would often sleep 10-12 hours a day, meaning his dreams or sleeping state constituted half of his life. Descartes's father loved his son and called him "his philosopher" because of his inquisitive nature, so he arranged for his son to receive the best education in Europe at the Jesuit college of La FlΓ¨che. There he was given exceptional treatment, with private tutoring, and was allowed to attend courses at noon, rather than 5 AM as was expected of students around him. He would rarely associate with people or build friendships due to this. Over time this developed into a desire to remain hidden (almost anonymous), adopting the philosophy: Bene vixit, bene qui latuit, or "he lives well, he who remains concealed". Descartes didn't stay in France for long though, traveling throughout Europe. In 1618, while studying to join the army of the prince of Orange in Netherlands as a mathematician, he met a man that would change his life forever: a Calvinist named Isaac Beeckman. This man had a deep disregard for Aristotelian philosophy and metaphysics, and advocated for a mechanical physics and atomism. In some regards, he was far ahead of his time and we would only discover this in the 20th century. Unfortunately, he is such an obscure figure in history that not even a photograph of him exists today. The two men met near a large placard in Breda marketplace, both attracted by a detailed mathematical problem. They hit it off immediately and his influence on Descartes was dramatic. Descartes was a Catholic and was well versed in the philosophy of Aquinas that merged Christian theology and Aristotelian philosophy. Under Beeckman's influence, he came to see Aristotle's metaphysics, which was based on ancient ontology, as an impediment to thought itself. In the mean time, Beeckman encouraged Descartes to solve and publish problems, resulting in his first book, Compendium Musicae, published in 1619. This kicked off his reputation as both a mathematician and philosopher. Descartes would add to this known detail, stating that a series of three dreams were seen by him as a revelation from God to go down this path... Unfortunately for Descartes, in 1624, the French parliament would make contradicting Aristotle punishable by death. This was a complete desecration of Aristotle's spirit, as he believed in philosophical debate and criticism, rational argument over authority, and the combined power of epistemology and ontology through dialectic discourse. Without a counterparty that is free to speak, there is no discourse and no need for Aristotle's ingenious language formalism. Descartes, feeling intellectually suffocated, decided to leave France for good in 1628, and headed to the Netherlands. There he began working on the mathematical physics theory that Beeckman pushed him into. He would particularly focus on problems in optics -- as it were, his mentor Beeckman was from the same Middleburg town that specialised in this field, and this would have surely influenced Descartes. During this period of history, geometry was solved using geometric methods -- Euclidian in nature and sometimes cumbersome without lifelong dedication to the field. Algebra, on the other hand, was used to solve complicated relationships symbolically. Combining these two would be a boon: optimistically, there would be no need to imagine curves -- solutions would drop out of equations. Descartes would develop this for years, resulting in his second most significant book: a combined Philosophy-math-physics book Discourse on the Method, published in 1637. Here his analytical geometry, and optics solutions, would exist as appendices. For Descartes, these were merely demonstrations of the power of his methods: A complete dismantlement of Aristotle's philosophy, and the scholastic method. There was trouble for Descartes though, as Fermat had priority, releasing Methodus ad Disquirendam Maximam et Minimam et de Tangentibus Linearum Curvarum in 1636, with a superior methodology for combining algebra with geometry. In fact, what we now know as Cartesian geometry, more closely resembles Fermat's method than Descartes'. To rub salt on the wound, Fermat had already developed this in 1629 as he could prove by correspondences, he just had not published it. Curiously, this well known piece of history is left out of most biographies of Descartes that read by academic students. This is likely because he has to be seen to demonstrate some novel application of his methods. In any case, Descartes was furious! Fermat, to him, was a mere lawyer. Math was just a hobby, and yet he was an absolute giant compared to Descartes. Here he was taking away the most significant development of his life. He sent Fermat a challenge so that the two could put their geometrical methods to the test: the folium of Descartes. Descartes suggested that Fermat try and find the tangent line of xΒ³ + yΒ³ = 3axy at any point of the curve. Embarrassingly, not only did Fermat do this with ease using his method, Descartes had two compounded failures: He failed to solve his own problem, and he could not properly imagine the full quadrant leaf-like shape of the curve whereas Fermat could. This was an absolute scandal, the 'father of analytical geometry', could not properly draw the curve to his own equation. Descartes would send letters defaming Fermat behind his back, and the arguments that arose from it were quite heated. This wasn't abnormal for Descartes! Many years earlier, had burnt bridges with Beeckman, all over a similar need to own an idea. Beeckman was proud of Descartes, claiming him to be his old student and Descartes interpreted this as an attempt to steal his work. In fact, he hurt him so badly that the two never recovered in their friendship. Increasingly isolated, and without a true significant result to his name, Descartes communicated that he began to worry about his place in history. His Method book, on the backdrop of these events, would not get much attention -- not yet anyway. A few years earlier, he had an illegitimate child with his personal maid, who he named Francine Descartes. Heartbreakingly, she inherited his frail composition, and died of scarlet fever at the age of 5. Descartes deeply loved his daughter, and upon her death was filled with so much sorrow that he couldn't stop crying. It was said that he would hold a coffin-like box while he slept every night, with other rumours (likely untrue) that he built an android like mechanical replacement of it. One thing is certain: This was the worst moment of Descartes life and it would scar him as a father in ways that would never ever heal. The same man who lived in virtual anonymity and held back Le Monde after seeing what had happened to Galileo, suddenly had a different direction. In the darkest hour of his soul, he releases a different kind of book, one that would change the course of history and perhaps one that could very well be the cause of our extinction should we not properly study it: Meditations, 1641. This book was a perversion of philosophies of the time, wrapped around a dark ritual and many old ideas. We will discuss this book, and his methods, in great detail in the next section. For now, it's important to note that Meditations caused Descartes to be declared an atheist by many Calvinists in protestant dominated Netherlands. He was condemned by the university of the town he was staying at, Utrecht, leading him to flee to the Hague. He remained in the Netherlands until 1649 under the protection of its prince. He left the country in 1650, heading to Sweden to teach Queen Christina. She did not like him very much, and forced him to get up at 5 AM in order to teach her. His frail body could not handle this, and his illnesses finally catch up with him, causing him to die of pneumonia**. Before continuing, let us pray for his soul and for God to forgive him for his mistakes. Descartes was a truly tragic, isolated figure, not dissimilar to your oomfie in many of his qualities, methods and isolation. May, you rest in peace, Rene Descartes. πΉππ» * I wanted to make sure of this for myself, so I searched the course work of the top 40 universities in the world, and also sampled the top 200 universities. The inclusion of Rene Descartes in their courses is universal. You cannot study philosophy today without touching his work and being influenced by it. ** I am aware of the theory that he was killed by a Catholic Priest Jacques VioguΓ©, who slipped arsenic into his communion wafer. I have not done sufficient research to determine the veracity of this claim, and in a sense, I hope it isn't true because it would make this already tragic story that much more tragic. *** Back then it was called Modern Greats.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Bunker Busters and Armageddon /𧡠The war with Iran has been authorised by the psychopath in chief Trump. From the very beginning, at the start of his term, he placed a proverbial Chekhov's gun on the fire place at Diego Garcia: B-2s. The threat wasn't the stealth but the load. https://t.co/mx1BlhJKBR
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Before I begin, it's important to understand some characteristics of the B-2 bomber. What it can do and what it cannot do. The B-2 is not a magic stealth bomber, it has a physical extent and is easily detectable by a competent enemy -- it is usually escorted by fighter jets. https://t.co/kDQbvAM8aO
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
The F-117 had a much smaller RCS and was shot down by Serbian defenders with ancient SAMs. The B-2 can be easily targeted unless air supremacy is achieved. The point of using B-2s is in fact, NOT their stealth capability... It's their bomb bay capacity! https://t.co/eB62EA6yXr
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
The B-2 bomb bay is so massive that it can carry not one but two Massive Ordnance Penetrators (GBU-57/MOP). It's actually these bombs that form Chekhov's gun against Iran: these bombs are not what they seem and were redesigned for this mission from 2009 onwards. 20-30 were built. https://t.co/LcOceIjjbh
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Most of what we know about the MOP is from what is offered as unclassified press statements. The specifications are one of the most highly classified secrets within the US military and government. Notably, it is the largest/heaviest bomb deployed by any military in the world.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
The GBU-57 has never been officially used in combat. This is curious given how many opportunities would have presented themselves over the course of the 13 years of its active service. The small number officially built is also curious. Its design was proposed right after 9/11.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
The bomb's specifications are staggering. This is a very long bomb at 6.2m, and yet, at least physically it can only penetrate >60 meters of soil but only around 8 meters of reinforced concrete. Payload of 2,700kg*. This presents a very difficult problem for this mission. https://t.co/bVEZaKSKtx
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Our best intelligence on its supposedly intended target, Fordow, suggests that the target is buried under 800m-1km of mountain granite. The 2,700kg payload, were it conventional, would merely tickle someone in this facility! Something is deeply wrong here, let's investigate. https://t.co/Kf1TPMxsGZ
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Our most recent source of information is an annual (2023) report by the Director Operational Test and Evaluation, signalling modifications done to the MOP. This particular report slipped by most people's radars but it contained some important information. Fuze and guidance (GPS) https://t.co/w3tVEC15Us
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
The modification, reported in 2023, was completed around February 2025: It allegedly focused on the bomb's fuze, supposedly a void vacancy detection fuse, suggests that this bomb is designed to bomb deep tunnel entrances and detonate within them. Keep this in mind for later. https://t.co/cszwsijGO4
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
The guidance system for the MOP was reported as laser guidance in the past, but there is no evidence of this and the only intelligence we have suggests it is GPS/INS guided, which makes sense for deep targets beyond laser painting reach. This means the MOP has a CEP of 5-10m. https://t.co/NQdTeHDv8A
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
What is a Circular Error Probability? It's quite a simple concept. If you drop 20 of these, you'll get a pattern like that below. Of the 20 bombs dropped, 10 of them (i.e. 50%), will drop within a circle of 5 meters (or 10 meters at worst). Even with guidance, there is a scatter. https://t.co/NDOKolSVOG
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Right now, stenographers/media propagandists are suggesting that the MOP has a purely conventional fill. The basis is this photograph released by the US airforce. The bomb supposedly has two filling: AFX-757 - 2000 kg A polymer based insensitive explosive PBXN-114 - 342 kg (*) https://t.co/o6m0YSMFWA
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
This payload and penetration would make it completely useless in this mission. In fact, the most it would be able to do is disable the entrances to the facilities, and we've seen from Iranian tempo that this would only last 24-48 hours before tunnels are operational again.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
But the US is not stupid. It just wants you to think it is. And it also thinks you are stupid. Let's fix that. I will present the stupidest idea I've ever seen proposed for how this bomb can possibly reach Fordow. Here is the setup. Let's think about reaching the facility itself: https://t.co/wq6PPYYUdS
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
You drop a single GBU-57 into the mountain range, let's say the fins stabilise it and it comes in at an almost vertical angle for deepest penetration and proper bomb operation. Look at this test and notice how the soil "swallows" it, as though it was going through water. https://t.co/zBwiFPDrc4
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
But it stops at 8 meters and blows its 2.4 ton payload without finding a cavity. Well, you might say, you can just hit that same 'tunnel' and just keep "drilling" into the mountain using these limited number of bombs, until you reach Fordow at 800 meters. https://t.co/RveZHA6mCn
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Right away, anyone who isn't physically or numerically challenged will spot some impossibilities here: 1. A bomb with a diameter of 0.8 meter and a CEP of 5m is never going to strike the same spot twice. 2. The angle of penetration won't be the same, even for the same plane! https://t.co/yILrok7Wbk
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
3. Gravity won't stop and the soil, rock, etc. will cover up the hole as quickly as an unconventional explosion could. 4. With only 20-30 priceless bombs to play with, and a penetration depth of 8 meters, and say a cratering damage equivalent to the same, you will reach only 480m https://t.co/nZ1Wyo0zC2
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
This means this was never the true purpose of the MOP. It cannot be used for such a stupid mission. So we have to conclude that the Whiteman AF base photograph release was a PSYOP and a particularly clever one dealing with compartmentalisation. I'm going to explain what it's for.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
There is another payload that is very similar to the 342kg "booster" payload: The B61 Mod 11/12/13, coming in at between 320-350kg. A few dozen of the B61 Mod 13 have been built. Enough for every MOP in service. The B61 Mod 13 is an Earth Penetrating Weapon (bunker buster)! https://t.co/v4bA9xiYAI
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
The B61 Mod 13 was meant to retire the 1 Megaton B83-1 bomb. The B61 Mod 13 supposedly uses the same physics package as the Mod 7, but in theory, it can pack a much bigger punch (~1 kt/kg through to 6kt/kg ). Something like ~700kT is plausible -- we can't know until it blows. https://t.co/xPyEv1SGFx
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
The timing and urgency of this modification program is quite suspect. Gravity bombs are utterly useless except for enemies whose air defences have been largely destroyed. This even holds true for the GBU-57 even when carried by the B-2. The B61Mod13 is rated for very high g's!
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Let's say, the B61-Mod 13 can be disassembled (removing its fins) and reassembled into the highly modular BLU-127 (GBU-57's case). What if the 2000 kg filling was instead filled with a shock absorbing material? It can be an inert elastomer rather than the AFX757 filing!
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Then you have a bomb that can create a nuclear blast wave THROUGH the tunnel system presumably, past the blast walls, CRUSHING/suffocating everything inside the facility. In shallower targets, from the shockwave alone, crush it all. /End PS This is how Nasrallah was assassinated. https://t.co/WJNuWIjqsO
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Addendum: What happens if the US fails? What happens if the Iranian "granite level" reinforced concrete survives this attack? What happens if Iran's air defenses hold? The US will be exposed for having used nuclear weapons inside Iran. Iran will retaliate, armageddon will begin. https://t.co/evpC5NvH4j
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
The Folly of Normie Psychology in the Context of Nuclear Explosion Analysis /π𧡠Normies, especially those who think they know more than they do, usually have a one dimensional explanation for an event that cannot survive cross-discipline scrutiny. They don't use science, and I don't mean reading crap from a textbook but the method. They do not use Bayesian analysis and are unable to show any signs of neuroplasticity when it comes to their world view. They approach every question with a maximum likelihood expectation methodology that is based on their normie priors. They don't believe in a black and white truth as we autists do. We cannot really blame them here though, imagine what the world looked like if everyone was autistic. Let's take a look at this issue from an empathetic lens and try to think about what sets a normie off when encountering something seemingly ridiculous. For us, there are only three answers to a yes or no question: Yes, No or I don't know. There's no "oh well, I'll just go with the norm" answer, which means finding the average and expected possible answer and feeling some affinity to it, ignoring all the data in the process. This is followed up by attacking those who do not align, as it is an attack on the normie's priors which form the basis of his "pseudo-intelligence". Let's go through with the normie counter-arguments with respect to nuclear attacks in general. Dismissing the source: "You think every large explosion is nuclear". This is demonstrably false, but it doesn't matter to the normie. He will use insults and lies as an argument and this will impress and calm down the normies around him. I do not need to explain further why this is sub-room temperature IQ, feel free to immediately ignore anyone who yields this argument. I don't have much sympathy for these ones. Ignoring details, relying on domain-limited pattern as priors. Normies do not work on any kind of analysis but a probability system that likely serves them well in life, much like a trained animal. Complicate things a little bit and it all falls apart. For example, when analysing mushroom clouds, craters, damage patterns [implied overpressure and altitude of explosion] and so on, should we demonstrate discernment through multiple disciplines, normies will ignore this analysis and fall back on their irrelevant priors. Whatever they don't understand is "schizobabble" or whatever new thought terminating cliche they prefer. For example, they don't understand convection and the maximum temperature of explosive plumes and the nuclear mushroom cloud's temperature and related fluid dynamics. So to them the only thing that matters is the size of a mushroom cloud, not its shape or its dynamic behaviour. Not the conditions under which it was formed! Here I will admit my own fault to demonstrate the flaw in this thinking. Let's discuss drift: I proposed a model whereby any drift of the plume would indicate a low temperature gas and not a plasma, thus eliminating the possibility of a nuclear attack. But... this turned out to be false to my own shock. I initially dismissed the Engels attack as nuclear for this exact reason. We all saw the stem... literally drift and move. It turns out my model was indeed one dimensional -- I only considered a surface blast, or some kind of dive attack targeting the surface/maximising vertical velocity for maximum impact (bunker busters). This assumption did not in fact hold for low-yield airbursts from a high velocity delivery system (i.e. a subsonic/supersonic cruise missile). There is no reason for the plasma ball to immediately lose all the momentum of the missile, even if it expands in all direction. For higher yields, the stem will be so thick and the plume as to make this likely less perceptible, but in reality we don't have a complete model outside the simplified pattern we observed with the most typical use of nukes, and a few counter-examples (Toropets -- which was also launched by a cruise missile, but didn't really seem to drift). In this case, what is the truth? We can fall back on the fundamental physics involved which would involve a very costly analysis, or we can do something else -- find evidence that eliminates any alternate hypothesis to a nuclear explosion. In the case of Engels the ground damage pattern eliminated the idea of some kind of warehouse explosion. In this case we update our model and relax some conditions. This is an example of Bayesian inference, but with a hard threshold margin (almost 100% yes, almost 100% no or else I don't know). This also involves being humble enough to admit fault, and in a big way. But that is science, that is the process of gathering new data and being flexible. We must use every single observation to eliminate all alternative explanations or find some kind of ambiguity that forces us to give up and mark it as inconclusive. On the flip side, the normie cannot handle some details derived from advanced physics, for example, that eliminate their explanation. They will simply hang on to it because it "sounds right", even if its laid bare as false by a single contradictory observation. For example, "hairy" mushroom clouds -- something I've observed but never brought up as I didn't feel the distinction was yet necessary. They cannot explain why a putative hot plume of explosives going off all at once could reach a temperature that creates a plasma. Wisdom of the crowd: Relying on popularity of opinion Hey, if CNN isn't calling it a nuke, then it just isn't okay? I think most people aren't as affected by this after experiencing so many lies held as truth by the majority. But within cliques this is quite an obvious "out". They may even play up the audacity of the claim as a form of ridicule. Doesn't really change reality though does it? False inference: "If that happened then this would have happened!" Inference is very useful in life, and I use it all the time. Remember that Oreshnik strike on Dnipro? I said it couldn't have been an ICBM because I didn't observe anything that would indicate an elevation to DEFCON 1, what you would expect from an unscheduled (even alerted for) intercontinental missile launch. This is something you use immediately, but reflect on later. You cannot rely on it for deep analysis. It's a gut feeling. I cannot fault most normies for sticking to this knowing nothing else. In this context, the argument is simple: "If a nuke went off we would all be dead" This argument doesn't actually change whether it was a nuke or not. It is actually a test of the MAD model. If a nuclear explosion was confirmed, then, well, the MAD model was wrong and people should give it up. More on this mindset shortly. But who can confirm a nuclear explosion? Argument by authority Look for all intents and purposes, I am just a random sh*tposter who doesn't know anything about what he's talking about on the internet. For all you know I'm a 19 year old who writes well enough to attract an audience. To a normie, that should actually change whether what I say is true or not. But reality is different -- a perfect argument could be made by a completely anonymous person. Jim Cramer can make correct calls sometimes, especially if he backs what he says with a real analysis. In this context, we speak of a negated statement -- the fact that no authority spoke of a nuclear explosion or attack. Does this mean none happened? No. There is a likelihood of lie by omission for strategic reasons, or omission by ignorance/lack of capabilities. But to a normie, if the ever present (in their mind) "satellites" "do not pick it up", it never happened. Do they question whether they have direct access to these satellites or not? No, they rely on an authority figure to sound the alarm that doomsday has arrived. Yet that doesn't have any effect on whether an explosion is nuclear or not. It's simply an outer-complexity that has many other factors at play. Remember COVID? How the 'authorities' created a world wide panic based on fraudulent data? Remember how they faked satellite footage to disguise the damage Oreshnik did to Ukraine? The authorities are always willing to lie if it serves them. Why should we wait for them to speak up and say the truth? Inability to discard a prior after its eliminated by a posterior This is the absolute key cornerstone of why normies stay normies. They're unable to admit that they are stupid, just like me (though I assure you I'm the stupidest person of all). That is to say, they are unable to admit that something they've assumed was true for all time, is in fact not true. Let's take a look at a core example: The existence of a low-yield and very low residual/non-prompt radiation nuclear weapon. From high school, they remember that there are fission and fusion weapons, and no one has ever made a pure fusion weapon. The latter is actually false, pure fusion "weapons" have existed in a hypothetical extent before fission was even weaponised, but they are supposedly so large an impractical that at best they have the same weight-to-yield ratio as TNT. This simplistic idea is played as follows in a normie's mind: "Well, since pure fusion weapons cannot be created, you must use a fissile core, and thus it will always leave behind a lot of radiation that can be picked up by [some authority]". What if I proposed a hypothesis: Actually, they can minimise the fallout, to the extent where after the prompt radiation byproducts die down over a short period, nothing measurable outside of a soil sample remains. It is not quite as strict as a pure fusion weapon, but even this is rejected because -- as far as the open literature is concerned -- this isn't really a weapon whose analysis/design has been revealed. [Aside: Ironically from documents I shared earlier, everyone should now know these MRRs were at least tested in the US, thus could exist today as part of its arsenal.] But what if we analyse all the relevant data, and find that it was indeed a nuclear explosion by eliminating any other putative cause? And at the same time, we do not detect any radiation through open sources, at least not to a threshold desired by the normie? Obviously, since it cannot be anything but a nuclear weapon, then the prior is wrong. That means we have discovered a new piece of information: there can be nuclear explosions without detectable levels of fallout. But the normie will be stuck here, he cannot let go of priors, for priors form a chain that builds up his world -- much like ours. Let's be honest, we all have priors. We are all forced to question them sometimes. There are some of us who know how stupid humans are (like myself) and are able to laugh at themselves for believing something false their entire life, throw it out and also throw out anything that depends on it. It's a huge effort, but once you get into it, it's absolutely exhilarating. This is actually the root of science and why I fell so deeply in love with it as an 8 year old boy, when I vowed to become a scientist when I grew up. They just don't like what the conclusion implies I kind of sympathise with this. No one wants their entire world shattered. It's a psychogenic event for many people and most meet it with anger. Yet if we are to judge a fact by whether we like the inferred conclusion, we will never get to the truth, instead we will only stay within comfort. To the normie, a single nuclear explosion, anywhere, that is not responded to, that is not even reported, shatters their entire world. The normie isn't alone, and deep down I do not blame them for their often violent reaction: One of the only great philosophers of modern times, Jean Baudrillard, saw things in a manner that precluded any kind of limited nuclear war. I do not wish to put words in the mouth of a great man who has passed so I will simply quote him directly: "A gigantic involution that makes every conflict, every finality, every confrontation contract in proportion to this [nuclear] blackmail that interrupts, neutralizes, freezes them all. No longer can any revolt, any story be deployed according to its own logic because it risks annihilation. No strategy is possible any longer, and escalation is only a puerile game given over to the military. The political stake is dead, only simulacra of conflicts and carefully circumscribed stakes remain." - Simulacra and simulation, 1981 I like to think that Jean's eyes (may they rest in peace) would light up at the realisation that nuclear war is not only possible but was on-going during his life. That our world is not a nihilistic simulacrum without a political stake, without anything that can potentially consume all of humanity into an informational singularity ruled over by decrepit and foolish "leaders". That's how I stopped worrying and learned to love the clean bomb. β’οΈ /End
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Why are nuclear weapon going to be the preferred weapon for tactical engagements in the future? /π𧡠The problem faced by military planners is the interaction of three technological phenomena: 1. The advancement of A2AD which has made any overflight mission dangerous. 2. The advancement of entrenchments and armour hardening materials that can make any conventional attack fail to do any damage. 3. The creation of deep underground military bunkers with extremely hardened access points. Over time, all exposed high value assets were protected by AD, placed inside bunkers, or sat behind advanced entrenchments that could take direct hit from high calibre rounds. Did you notice how no matter how many times missiles were fired on the US/Israel in the middle east it largely amounted to nothing? So what is really needed is a very compact weapon with a high yield, one that can be fit on a missile or small bomb carried by a stealth aircraft that can penetrate enemy radar. What's needed is something that can create a shockwave under the ground. What's needed is something that can completely ignore armour and penetrate even the hardest materials known to man. There's only one weapon that can fulfil all these requirements: a nuclear weapon. In the 80s, all of this was realised by military planners, and papers were put forward to advocate the use of nuclear weapons in a limited manner. People didn't like this idea though, because it was always assumed that any limited use of small nuclear weapons would eventually result in mutually assured destruction through a strategic exchange of much larger nuclear weapons designed to destroy entire cities. Then the Soviet Union collapsed... and that was the end of the story. Not really. The US kept working on this concept of limited nuclear warfare. By the start of the year 1999, as part of the DoE report, the US revealed that it has successfully tested a minimal residual radiation weapon among other alarming advancements. Please refer to the report and text below: After the 9/11 terror event [false flag], Saddam Hussein was demonised and it was claimed nuclear weapons would be required to destroy his bunkers. These were called Earth Penetrating Weapons, or Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrators (RNEP). This was not received well by the public. So, another kind of weapon was created: The completely impractical MOAB which achieves absolutely none of the tactical requirements, by being so heavy that only a few jets can launch it and only by overflying what would be heavy air defense. It could also do hardly anything against deep bunkers. The yield was also pathetic at around 2 tons. Basically, 4 Mk84s dropped by a couple of jets could have the same devastating power. But this weapon had a purpose: it was PSYOP. As long as people knew the MOAB existed, any large explosion could be pinned on it. After all, the majority of the planet doesn't understand anything about tactical engagements or even the load that jets can take on their hard points. The stage was set: the MRRs and RNEPs could be used to achieve whatever it was the US military required without the public really having any say. Other countries, largely defeated because of the Soviet Union's fall, could do nothing but watch. After all, should they speak up, it would only normalise the usage of such weapons -- they have no form of reply to a power like the United States. The stage was set. On March 20th, 2003, the US invaded Iraq. This invasion did not go to plan. The Iraqis put up a hell of a fight around Baghdad Airport. The airport had no more air defenses, but was hardened and had a very deep underground military bunker inside of it. The US military battalion sent to take it was handily defeated. Then suddenly, the power in Baghdad went out, and Donald Rumsfeld triumphantly announced the death of 10,000 republican guards defending I knew what had happened, and shortly afterwards I have incontrovertible evidence of nuclear weapon use at Baghdad airport -- one I even posted on Twitter, and because I posted it, I was threatened with a permanent suspension and was forced to delete it. It was from that point (at least as I saw it) that history bifurcated. Everyone saw a conventional victory against an army that simply vanished. What happened was something far darker. A new age was upon us -- an age where a single empire could completely destroy a nation's military using nuclear weapons while the world watched none the wiser. You see, back then, smartphones did not exist as they do today. You had to rely on journalist's transmission of news and events. Even then, it didn't take long for the leaks to come. First from US military officers, and eventually from the Iraqis themselves. No one but me and a few Russian/Ukrainian friends bought it though. Of all the esoteric things on the internet, this was the most esoteric and well kept secret. I never forgot it though and it really shaped the rest of my life. I went on to discover that this wasn't the first use of this weapon. I even discovered a much earlier use in the 80s which provoked the US into this line of warfare. Today... I think it's plausible that other nations have this kind of weapon, albeit not as good as the United States'. It is in the interest of larger nations that smaller ones are kept in the dark about the existence of such system. If it turns out that nuclear weapons are now just another form of munition -- and more so, victory is now impossible without their usage, then the ultimate criminal pact of the Non-Proliferation Treaty withers away. Then, all nations, even tiny ones, should have access to this technology. And the entire world order fades away. To me, and to those who see things the way I do, this is exactly what is most desirable -- a far more complex and far more interesting world, where even the small players can have a huge effect on history. /End
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
Meet the squirrel (Peaunt) killers from the New York Department of Environmental Conservation. Can you gnotice one thing they all have in common? https://t.co/EHCNPVm2Nr
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈ
What do nuclear weapons SOUND like? The short answer is a gunshot (akin to a shotgun), followed by a turbulent roar. Here is a rare, captured example from the Upshot-Knothole Annie test, 1953. This thread will explain why nukes sounds like gunshots & why regular bombs don't! /𧡠https://t.co/eWe3nlCIE2
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
It has been exactly 23 years since the terrorist attack on 9/11. On that day one event seemed like magic: How did the WTC towers vanish into thin air? Like a cigarette butt! π¬ This question will make you RETHINK reality! Forget jet fuel & steel beams. Think PULVERIZATION! /𧡠https://t.co/LrRxQkyauE
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
I'm going to assume you've already come by the idea that 9/11 involved controlled demolitions and what not. You may or may not agree with that hypothesis -- that won't matter. In this thread we will eliminate answers, rather than answer questions. How did the towers disappear? https://t.co/BqxIVWIf5K
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Even though, right in front of your eyes, you see two towers that had completely disappeared your mind will probably refuse this notion. Something large and solid like this wouldn't just vanish. "That's nonsense!" It simply turned to rubble right? The problem is it did not. Look: https://t.co/6rJ7jxffmi
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Some of you may object -- and cite some conventional demolitions like this as an example. You'll notice this is a reinforced concrete structure. It did not "vanish" but left a lot of rubble, the same volume as it started minus some crumbled concrete. WTC was different. https://t.co/7JcepC2K1s
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Each of the two WTC towers were constructed out of steel, 90,000 metric tons of it. The weight bearing structure was the exterior perimeter acting as Vierendeel trusses, and the interior balanced the forces of the floors and lift superstructure. The concrete was NOT load bearing. https://t.co/7FK7379VkT
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
In the pseudoscientific literature, "Journal of Structural Engineering", 2022 some clowns from the University of Minnesota attempted to answer this problem. Here is the model they came up with. I will demonstrate why this is impossible & even laughable, but just pause and think: https://t.co/Vvjh5Vw4XE
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Has a tower ever crumbled down into nothing? For that matter, has a mountain? On its own? Through its own gravitational pull? Don't tell me "pretensioned steel" -- this is compressive. Of course not. At least, except for three towers on 2001/09/11. Then, never again since then. https://t.co/OWL83DUoN1
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The 2022 paper is actually the ONLY attempt so far, by academics, to explain the spontaneous pulverization of the towers. That's right, not just "melted beams", but the towers turning essentially to DUST. It begins by citing a lie, then presenting a purely kinematic argument. https://t.co/qeJDdduMpN
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Rather than reconstruct these people's FEM model and show why it couldn't work, or nit pick it, I will instead address the OUTRIGHT LIE by Bazant et al. all the way back from 2001, that the tower had sufficient energy to "make a progressive story-by-story collapse inevitable". https://t.co/KrkSyJPtvz
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
We have to shift the focus to the mechanism of destruction: 90,000 tons of steel "disappeared". Let's focus on ONE place we know it ended up: Much of it spontaneously turned into fine translucent dust. This dust ended up everywhere and on everyone. It was HIGHLY toxic too. https://t.co/m0bGmywzLl
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
A USGS survey of the dust detected Fe-rich primary metal and metal-oxide phases. Unfortunately, the dust also consisted of everything else in the tower which was pulverised into fine dust (1% in 2.5um, 99% above). We can say given visuals of rough transparency, 80um on average. https://t.co/4qdi2vduTz
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Now, the concrete couldn't have disappeared on its own, and certainly, if the steel (thus iron), which held up the building remained, it wouldn't have collapsed. So the 90,000 m. t steel was certainly pulverised along with the rest of the 450,000 mt tower, minus basement mass. https://t.co/jbGCNaeowR
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
In fact, in a "mystery" I won't answer in this thread, some of this dust piled up in the very hot basement! Shown below are two of the "WTC meteorites", with the one on the left representing four entire floors of steel structure, concrete, office furniture, equipment & people. https://t.co/06srtExa3j
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
How could the towers have turned to dust in an instant? Let's eliminate one stupid idea by a shill, Judy Wood: Directed energy weapons. Like lasers or wacky particle beam. But this is outright impossible: There was no "energy build up"!
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
All directed energy weapons involve a transfer of energy, through photonic emission. This can be used to ionise a target, but such a thing would 1st result in a phase change from solid to liquid, then from liquid to gas. The towers didn't turn into gas, but dust -- still solid. https://t.co/Jch1lfHAJf
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
How can I possibly justify the idea that the tower instantly turned to dust? It sounds nonsensical, I know. Well... hold on to your seat and try not to scream. How did that steal beam turn to dust AS it fell??? Look at it again, carefully! Have you ever seen this before? https://t.co/jQpL8lV42F
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Once you've absorbed the above, watch this video of the North tower's top section collapsing SOLIDLY (not as dust) into the tower below, which offers zero resistance. This eliminates the silly "DEW" idea, as a column of energy would have "vaporised" the building uniformly. https://t.co/tYZsizDt2x
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Now you probably have even more questions than before. What the hell happened to the steel below? Let's return to the initial paper's assumption: That the top floors, teleporting through the "weakened" floors below (from muh jet fuel) pulverised the entire building. (π) https://t.co/awwsxXhoZi
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Let's grant 12 floors of mass of the 110 floor tower, and 1 "missing" floor where the putative failure occurs. This is more than generous and unrealistic. Each floor was 4 meters high. That's 12/110=11% of the mass or for a 450,000 ton building, 49,500 tons of concrete and steel.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
We can use a basic formula from physics, P=mgh to obtain 1.94GJ as the energy of this impact. One questions arise: If this is enough to pulverise the next floor, how much kinetic energy would remain? We would need enough energy to pulverise the next floor and so on!
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Furthermore, the "pulverising mass" doesn't have any more strength/hardness than the mass below, they are EXACTLY the same. We can assume we would lose at least one floor to pulverisation/dispersion to crumble another. This means we would stop at just 24 floors. Thus, impossible!
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
[Point 1: If you can't grasp the last point, remember Newton's third law: every force is complemented by a matching force in the opposite direction.] [Point 2: As the floors meet resistance, they will slow down and the impact will get lower and lower.] https://t.co/bRIj2VJb06
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
I'm going to go further to reveal a bigger problem. Let's return to the impact energy of the putative mass. A kg of TNT has about 4.184 MJ of energy. At 1.94GJ, the energy of the top mass is equivalent to: 464 kg of TNT. This is distributed across an area of ~4,000 m^2.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
This impact is thus equivalent to distributing 100 grams of TNT (yes,grams) for each meters squared of flooring, whether this is a steel beam or concrete etc. this would be on the surface, not *embedded* within the target, as it would be a surface impact. Similar to a M67 grenade https://t.co/wojcPTm92l
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
You can thus, create a scaled experiment at home by strapping a grenade to a concrete or reinforced structural steel beam and verify for yourself that it doesn't get pulverised. There's not enough energy to do this. You could blow the sheet metal of a washing machine up though: https://t.co/n2UeQoFgzV
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Thus, we can also safely discard the stupid pancake collapse idea and its modern incarnation of "spontaneous crumbling". That leaves one question then: How much energy would it take to actually pulverize 100 floors of the WTC spontaneously [and from the bottom upwards]?
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
And for that matter, HOW would you do this? Through a mechanical wave pulse of immense intensity & impulse, we can create a standing wave that pulverises the building! Sound. This wave would travels through the metal, concrete and so on, much more dense than the air around it. https://t.co/cUY8YGndHG
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
It might seem easy for a glass, and wouldn't take much energy, but concrete, rock and metal is a totally different ball game. You would need to vibrate the lattice of each of these materials with such a large phonon energy that the bonds break apart at many site defects points. https://t.co/xR5Ufb7Xvd
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
[You might also wonder where and how the HELL such a mechanical wave could be generated, I'm not going to answer this question in this thread. :) You will have to wait for my final thread] [NB: The wave will remain in the lattice, like sound waves remain in the water of the sea.]
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The energy needed to pulverise rocks/metals/etc. using this putative method is actually a LOT lower than the energy required to simply shatter it. Watch this video of a hydraulic press pulverising granite (the strongest material we have, but brittle vs steel) using compression: https://t.co/P2cXjnGuf2
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
[Aside: A mechanical wave would be the same deal as a hydraulic press, as the wave front would be one of compression, but with a twist: We need to compress the entire energy into a single impulse, or a kind of Dirac delta. There is only one device in the world that can do that.] https://t.co/hGJVD9tk2H
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Steel of course crumbles in a different manner than does granite, but we can use granite, or even softer rock as a sort of "rough" energy threshold model for the wave front. If a wave cannot pulverise rock to 80 micron average fragments, then it cannot pulverise steel. https://t.co/LRWcGV5X18
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
It's actually very difficult to track down an equation that expresses such a complex process as pulverisation. I managed to do it after much research: The Kuznetsov equation. k50 = A (V/Q)^0.8 Q^(1/6) k50: Average fragment in cm A: rock factor V: rock vol (m^3) Q: kg TNT https://t.co/nCoqytKAQf
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
To make life easier for ourselves, let's focus on just the steel. The density of structural steel is about 7850 kg/m^3. At 90,000 tons this means we are crushing a volume of V=11,464 m^3 of steel. A hard rock factor of 7 would be a "medium" rock. https://t.co/0T7rnFrU6s
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
k50 would be set to 80um for the dust plume, or 0.08cm. We now have 3 knowns (k50, A, V) and one unknown, Q, the kg of TNT. Using a computer algebra system, I obtained an interesting solution: 156 million kg of TNT. Or, ~156 kilotons of TNT. https://t.co/eMBUzDM1Rh
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
That's a huge amount of energy. What if it was all strapped together to the building? That would literally be 156 kg of TNT for every 90 kg of steel construction. How long would that take to install and detonate simultaneously? Can the foundation even hold such a load? (π) https://t.co/7RKzcSXvVY
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
[Aside: As the pulse would be travelling through the building many times before it would blow outwards, thus, this is a magnitude approximation. Given the strength of steel bonds, and the additional material to crumble, I think it's still going to be about right, let's say 150kT]
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
There are two final questions: 1. What kind of device can create such a mechanical wave? And how do you use it? Can a terrorist group arrange such a thing? 2. What created the WTC meteorite? I will not answer either questions in this thread...
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Instead, let's get Netanyahu's opinion from 2011. Netanyahu claimed that he predicted that Iranians would plant a nuclear bomb in the basement of the WTC. [See for yourself here https://archive.is/9EpX1] I doubt it though, with Israelis, every accusation is a confession. :)
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Let's summarise what we learnt: 1. The steel beam/jet fuel melting meme is lame and irrelevant. 2. Judy Wood is a fraud. 3. The official story is nonsensical. 4. The two (three?) world trade centres vanished through the secondary effect of sound alone. Never forget 9/11. /End
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
P.S. Israel did 9/11. https://t.co/JXSj7YE3kK
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
*Washes the crime scene* https://t.co/NOFqyW5g2n
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Red vs White species. Part 4 In the previous threads, we discussed milk, Gog and Magog & then blood rituals. Rather than blood & milk, this will be Copper & Tin: The Bronze Age Collapse. The greatest blood ritual of all: Our origin and end of the entire ancient white world. /𧡠https://t.co/cJSyINwodH
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Canonically, 3300-3200 years ago, an event happened that changed the entire world: The Bronze Age Collapse (BAC). The (BAC) was less of a collapse and more of a world war! Despite the importance of this event, it's rarely taught in schools & was usually blamed on climate change. https://t.co/4cG9PEVEt3
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
This finally changed thanks to the work of archeologists who found an unfired clay tablet in the ancient Syrian city of Ugarit (near Idleb). In this tablet, it was made clear: Sea attacks were happening, and great deal of evil was exacted on these nations. Everyone was destroyed. https://t.co/eCvKsfy6A9
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
All the ancient civilisations, most importantly, the Phoenicians (called Canaanites for Judeo-satanic reason -- they did not identify as such), were destroyed! All but the Egyptians! The Egyptians survived, but only barely. They gave the attackers a name: The Sea Peoples. https://t.co/7IdIT9vqCS
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
There is a great emphasis on the plurality on the word people(s), as they consisted of 9 different nations: Lukka, Sherden, Shekelesh, Peleset, Denyen, Teresh, Tjekker, Weshesh, and Eqwesh. It's unknown who any of these groups were. But we now know of Ramesses III's opinion... https://t.co/3IAM2jwIpB
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Ramesses III described the Sea Peoples as bloodthirsty, anarchical, and evil: "The foreign countries made a conspiracy in their islands. All at once the lands were removed and scattered in the fray. No land could stand before their arms." Yet, the mechanics were far more complex! https://t.co/DlkaiDZegG
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
To dig into this subject, it is first important to set aside our modern history of this supposed era, which consists ONLY of the following primary sources: Josephus, the "inventor of Jewish history" The Old Testament Herotodus, the "father of lies" Homer's Illiad That's it. https://t.co/yVD8e8C3Ea
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
You might be wondering, what about the rest? Since Egypt survived, surely there is good material there. There you would be wrong. We know for a fact such material existed but was destroyed: Manetho wrote a highly cited work called Aegyptiaca, of which no copy survived. https://t.co/Q6AbEUHS9J
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Josephus, the inventor of Jewish history, cited Manetho in order to defend Jewish people. Manetho had attacked Moses as a misanthropic Shepard of "lepers"* and linked the Jews to the Hyksos who occupied a part of Egypt for 500 years before being expelled into Palestine. https://t.co/ldoo8I3uwc
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
We only have Josephus's retelling of Manetho's telling of history: Manetho describes that the "Asiatics", cruel people who were misanthropes, "impure" and corrupted the land. It's quite interesting how the blood ritual animal sacrifices were described as a humiliation ritual. https://t.co/ZiIgYT7dZd
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The Hyksos do sound similar to the sea peoples, but we cannot be so certain: The timelines do not quite align -- but only if we buy the supposed carbon-dating methodology used to time the sea peoples attack, supposedly 3300 years ago. The Hyksos attacked Egypt ~400 years earlier. https://t.co/JXnzkqKSzh
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The time between the Hyksos expulsion from Egypt (which would be the "Exodus" in the OT) and the Sea peoples is within one or two centuries however! This would have created a great deal of refugees. One other event is said to have happened around this time: The Trojan war. https://t.co/ZQRZVcp8P3
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The Trojan wars, as told in Homer's epic poems Illiad & Odyessy were seen as mythology by most soy historians throughout the modern period, until a German (Heinrich Schliemann) discovered the site in modern day Turkey back in 1870. It was a real war, with massive repercussions! https://t.co/SXEwWd25qn
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
[As an important aside, the Trojan wars were said by Homer, to be a consequence of Zeus's overthrowing Cronus (Saturn) and all of the Titans with them. In order to appease the Olympians who replaced the Titans. Keep this in mind & recall the painting of Cronus eating his child.] https://t.co/mcZJPVAM1l
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Due to the Trojan wars, a massive number of people were made refugees and scattered across the world. This war also broke what was a relatively peaceful period of time, where nations such as Phoenicia focused primarily on trade. Nations, presumably went about business as usual.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
This created an opportunity for misanthropes, to take over the entire world through a relatively simple strategy: 1. Recruit a portion of the displaced into mercenary armies using their own wealth! 2. Attack unprepared nations using these people 3. Create more displaced 4. Repeat
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The cities would be destroyed entirely so there is no return for these people. The nation's wealth must be looted and used to fund more expeditions. It would be like a fire burning across humanity with the refugees, to become sea peoples: this is why there were 9 nations. https://t.co/0CHZ0E93Dh
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The party needs only to await either natural disasters or wars to exploit and other factors: - Preexisting wealth to seed the operation. - No homeland that could face this kind of attack. They must also: - Hold extreme hatred for humanity (misanthropy). - Have an intended target
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
In all of the ancient past, only one group of people fit this description: The Hyksos who were expelled from Egypt. These people created a capital called Avaris, which blocked and taxed much trade into Egypt by land or sea. You could think of it as the ancient Suez Canal. :) https://t.co/tWgUHZWDTr
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
With this kind of rent-seeking area gone, the Hyksos would have had to find a new homeland where they could toil the soil. They would have fled with their wealth. Perhaps enough gold to forge an entire golden calf? Who could tell in this age. :) Returning to the BAC/Sea Peoples:
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
While Egypt was largely damaged but withstood the attack, all the other nations were destroyed. Their history pillaged & made another's. This created a power vacuum! One nation rose from it: Israel led by the Hebrews at the same time as the sea peoples were resettled in the area. https://t.co/oIvgXCyWzC
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The most significant thing is the disruption of sea trade and the destruction of Phoenicia, and its with this that we tie back into the first thread, where I had made a connection between Britannia and Phoenicia: As a reminder: Britain was the land of tin, by name even!
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
There was one counterpart to this tin: Copper. You see, Bronze is made up of tin and copper! This formed the main metal used for weaponry in that age. And the main source of Copper was the land of Copper -- Cyprus. Or Copporus in Phoenician/Aramiac!
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
In order to bring about the "Bronze age" you need to be able to produce bronze reliably! That means control of both Cyprus and Britain! In today's maps it's difficult to imagine this, despite knowing Phoenicia's sea faring prowess. But fear not, we can objectively demonstrate it!
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
To do so, I'm going to give you a crash course on genetics! You all have 46 chromosomes in the form of helical DNA, 23 from your mother and 23 from your father. But you also have a special kind of DNA in each of your mitochondrias: a circular one called mtDNA from your mother. https://t.co/74Ckd03m87
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
There are two special chromsomes: the sex ones (X, Y). The others are the autosomal chromosomes. The X chromosome you can get either from your dad or mother, so it cannot delineate paternal heritage. The Y chromosome you have is the same as your father's, his father and so on! https://t.co/tyUCSi6tgt
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Soyientists use Y chromosomes to determine origin, as they can all be grouped (within small variation) into what are called Y-chromosomal haplogroups. From these, scientists use their imagination to draw "migration routes". This completely ignores war and catastrophes. https://t.co/ygn6jksrAp
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Men will not merely migrate, but unfortunately r*pe and pillage lands during their wars. The BAC event was described as a melting pot: The original character of the land disappeared. Many further wars occurred in west Asia as it is a strategic trading route for all empires.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
We can get past this easily if we use our heads. The women who are unfortunately r*ped or taken as war trophies by settling victorious armies will be cared for if they give birth to their children. Those children will retain the mtDNA of their mother. Prepare for a surprise.
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
In this map, we observe mtDNA Haplogroup X. This Haplogroup exists in all Phoenician lands, Britain and one other shocking place: North America! This data was filtered to be within the natives that remained, not people who migrated in. This completely destroys anthropology. https://t.co/dYSentDLWt
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
It's notable that Haplogroup X exists most strongly in Gaelic areas in Britain and Iceland. Now could this be Atlantis? How deep are these historical inconsistencies? What happened to these people? These questions must wait. Next thread, we discuss the origin of the Reds. /End https://t.co/LJrskT48es
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Red vs White species. Part 3. In part 1, I identified Gag&Magog as the Red Jews. In part 2, I established a link between the Levant, Europe & England -- and milk! I revealed the desire for their destruction by the "Jews". We will now return to the subject of milk...& blood! /𧡠https://t.co/njJJUBEs5x
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Reminder: The people identified by Jews as Amalek (from England to the Levant) all drink milk. The Israelites were promised milk & honey, and had laws on milk consumption. Yet the [Red] "Jews" admit that 75% of them are lactose intolerant. They aren't who they claim to be. https://t.co/E3FWl8a1u0
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Despite being important, this deception is fairly shallow. We have to go deeper to get to the truth. In fact, as DEEP as we can possibly go: The very beginning. The first substance you consumed after being born is your mum's milk. Before that, the first substance was her blood...
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
When your mother was pregnant with you, your two bodies were separated in the womb and connected via an umbilical cord which flowed in whole blood (containing oxygen & nutrients) into you, and expelled waste products, mediated through a new organ your mother made: a Placenta. https://t.co/dvpENeu3pj
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The placenta acts as a temporary interface to the world for babies, and is two sided, one with the mother's genes, and the other dominated by the father's genes. These are separated by a intervillous space made of the mother's blood. It "protects" the mother from the baby too. https://t.co/fNCdZsJ0OK
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
When the baby is born, the placenta is ejected alongside it. The baby can no longer consume its mother blood. Its stomach can't consume foods and its immune system isn't developed. So during the pregnancy prolactin hormones causes the mum to form mammary glands that secrete milk! https://t.co/W6iMqjA4Cn
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The mammary glands consist of 20 alveolus. These are like little pipettes, which are actuated by the nervous system when baby suckling is detected. The mother generates milk [initially colostrum] and keeps the "pipette" full through a complex externally controlled homeostasis. https://t.co/GTWeu3GhF8
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The milk itself is synthesised inside Lactocyte cells which takes in building material from mother's blood supply and synthesises beta/kappa casein, milk fat globules. As a reaction to ever-present bacteria, white blood cells [+exosomes] traverse the cell walls & enter the milk! https://t.co/biAFPjiAgX
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The mother's cells also synthesises minerals, enzymes, secrete water as a filling compound, vital vitamins and everything a baby needs to grow on its own -- at least for the first six month. IMPORTANT NOTE: at no point was the mother's red blood directly connected to the milk. https://t.co/DNV8XmydEN
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Red vs White species. Part 2. Last thread, I spoke about the history of the red species, or "Gog and Magog". Most importantly, their agent Rothschild demanding Palestine & pasteurisation of milk, in England. We'll now dive deeper into the origin of the white species&Lebanon. /𧡠https://t.co/oDxz6AR4ZH
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Lebanon, as we call it today and in fact as we called it in ancient times, is named as such from the Phoenician language : π€π€π€ (L-B-N) triliteral root word for "milky white". It is also the root word of "Laban", the yogurt of the same colour & the curiosity doesn't end there. https://t.co/cCZlq2cYDv
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
You see, the Phoenician language, Aramaic, Hebrew (bastardised Aramaic), Arabic (corrupted Aramaic), Greek & Latin are really the same script and root language morphed over a long period of time and space. Observe the character chart connection here, Phoenician is the 4th column: https://t.co/I4eOv7OqTy
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Greek retains an important story from Phoenicia, namely the origin of Europe: Europa was a Phoenician princess, from the city of Tyre, who was carried away by a *WHITE BULL* (I am not joking) who was in fact Zeus in disguise, and taken to Crete, from which Greece was born. https://t.co/htiWCyFFfN
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
In the case of the Hebrew language, there is another interesting connection. In the second half of Genesis, we learn about Jacob's (later, Israel's) genealogy. His mother was from Aram, and from a family named Laban. He was then told to marry from this same Laban family. https://t.co/S1HG2CUulj
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
L-B-N being the root word for Rachel's family won't be a surprise to any of you, as she was extremely white like milk, which is where her name came from. Aram (now Damascus) was a land of the Amorites, very tall, white, blonde haired and light coloured eyed people. https://t.co/R2kw8kDSpv
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Unfortunately for Jacob, Laban's father tricked him -- to marry off such a precious child as his, he got him to work for 14 years. Then, he demanded that he stayed in Aram and not take Rachel with him. This created a family conflict that ended with a most fateful resolution... https://t.co/RQcW4It4k4
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Jacob and Laban make a covenant of separation and peace. Jacob must never marry over Rachel and must never mistreat her, but also must stay separated from Laban's land. Some debate exists as to where this separation point is, but it is likely near the sea of Galilee. https://t.co/GDIogD0CTc
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
It is south of this point that Israel, the ancient Israel that predated Moses (as he spoke of it), named after Jacob, whose children were 75% Amorite and thus, white, likely blue eyed, and blonde, lived. Note: these children of Israel were not Jews (a subset -- Judah's children!) https://t.co/0GeTliAlGA
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The reported (and logically consistent) appearance of Israelites was in sharp contrast to the general deformed appearance of Red Jews, i.e. Gog and Magog. We will come back to their true origin, but the main point here is, these people have no connection to ancient Israel. https://t.co/Tg9UgocRsr
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
A very important note to make here, is that this all occurred shortly after the "flood". There is some debate as to when this occurred, and whether the cyclical disasters cycle periodically between floods and extreme plasma events. I'll be bold and assume they're one & the same! https://t.co/diXXeDzxYK
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
I will leave expanding on this for another thread, but to bring us back to the previous thread: it is said that a global catastrophe happened. One that resulted in the destruction of most of humanity. Many different "species" would differentiate out of it! https://t.co/2t4hwHEFFz
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
A thousand years after a global catastrophe struck our planet (marked by the Younger Dryas), people emerged out of mountain ranges and immediately started farming on the surface. As evidence will show, they had cattle and drank milk from them -- as reliefs, drawings depict. https://t.co/Vlj7cmZ2CK
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
These species do not necessarily have to be focused in the Levant from which we know this cycle's civilisation spread from. There may have been survivors of a similar type of people elsewhere... this map of Lactase persistence lends us a huge hint: it radiates out of Britain!?!? https://t.co/bqr7KFFYr4
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
But we know the Phoenicians or their predecessors (carried by a white bull π), spread civilisation across the Mediterranean. England doesn't really show up on this map at all. In fact, it is widely known that Phoenicians set up shop in Cornwall to mine tin! But is that it? https://t.co/Rlkniy0ssC
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
In fact, even the name Britain comes from Phoencian: Baratanac, meaning the land of tin! As we would discover... there's a lot more. There are artefacts, coins, monuments and inscriptions all over the island, all with Phoenician or a unique Brit-Phoenician origin. https://t.co/7onk2RlGnT
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
But the curiosity does not end there. Remember how Lebanon's root triliteral is L-B-N meaning white and milky? Britain was not the only name for the island. It was also known as... Albion. With the same triliteral... L-B-N. https://t.co/3wVOzKImGr
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Modern historians claim both Lebanon & Albion were named based on observed land formations, in England's case some rock formation by the sea... π As we saw in the examples of Israel, Aram & more, land is always named after PEOPLE not formations! It ALSO means WHITE by the way! https://t.co/tcfjyyLvvY
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
You have probably never encountered any of this, but for a time... this was one of the most popular concepts in Albion. To the point where it was commonly accepted amongst intellectuals -- that England held the original Israelites (this isn't quite right but we'll get to that). https://t.co/OF6dcoZBdM
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The most important thing to note is the connection between white, milk and cow (down to the bull) and the origin of Europe, England & its connection to the ancient world. From language, to food to names. Many deep white roots connected Europe from England to the Phoenician coast! https://t.co/YB6iH3UJPy
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Today, Red Jews conveniently associate not only the Levant people (and most recently, Gazans) with their most hated foe, Amalek -- they also associate it with all of white people, which makes sense when you consider all of the above connection. They are one and the same! https://t.co/nxIMehyrrq
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The Red Jews, having inherited the story of the original Jews (who were, to be honest, little better when you read the gospel carefully), are commanded not only to "destroy Amalek's seed" but also "blot out his memory". This is a very important point that will unlock everything. https://t.co/NjnDftJicg
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
One final, important note for this part. We looked at the origin of words a lot, but what exactly does "Amalek" mean? It has two alternate meanings: 1. People of impressive feats. 2. Giants! [https://archive.is/oVNC4] Throughout the Torah, Moses' men went around genociding giants. https://t.co/ukmYRL7TRX
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Quite interestingly, a corrupted origin story of Albion appeared in the 12th century, positing that the island was discovered by a Trojan kind "Brutus", and he discovered the island was occupied by giants. He went on to genocide them and the last one killed's name was "Gogmagog". https://t.co/6MfbZ3oEkJ
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
This corruption was introduced by Geoffrey of Monmouth, who also corrupted the story of King Arthur. I don't want to get into that but it's important to note the lie reveals itself from his story: His claim that Britain was named after Brutus. We know it comes from Baratanac!
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The result of this corruption are two statues named Gog and Magog that stand in Guild Hall in the City of London, the seat of power of the Red Jews. Albion's land was conquered then used to attack its origin in the Levant. Next parts, we return to food/milk -- and destiny! /End https://t.co/vy6XfkZfGx
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The red versus the white species. Part 1. A unique thread with almost fantastic connections you may never thought were possible: we will dive into two opposing species' mysterious origins & ultimate destiny of our planet. One species is sustained by milk, the other, blood! /𧡠https://t.co/8Y2ti3eN7a
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Let's begin with the Red and their emperor: Mayer Rothschild and his future descendants. The name Rothschild was in fact, given to him, and meant "Red Shield". Rothschild was a Khazarian claiming to be Jewish. In fact, he was a hybrid of the "pure" Khazar but never mind that. https://t.co/0vXwiUaus6
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The Rothschild family itself appeared in Germany 250-300 years priors to Mayer's ascend to dominance via usury. 350 years earlier, Prince of Kiev Sviatoslav the brave destroyed the Khazar empire in today's Ukraine, and they fled to Europe where they mixed with the Ashkenazism. https://t.co/83UcIJ51zW
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
A hundred years prior to their appearance, a Germanic tale had spread throughout the continent, telling of an apocalypse started by a demonic people: The "Red Jews", who would invade Europe and destroy Christendom, leading to the events of the Apocalypse (i.e. Revelation). https://t.co/CQIe7Hh0ca
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The story would start: "Far, far away from our areas, somewhere beyond the Mountains of Darkness, on the other side of the Sambatyon Riverβ¦there lives a nation known as the Red Jews". This in fact corresponds to both Khazaria and Gog and Magog from the Romance of Alexander! https://t.co/j5QXk8ULt9
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Namely, north of the Sambatyon River happens to be the city of Ashkenaz (where defeated Jews -- actual Jews -- were routed by the Assyrian empire) and north yet is a special location: the Darial Gorge in modern day Georgia. This was the Southern extent of the Khazarian empire. https://t.co/tPHJmseQD1
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Along the Darial Gorge, Alexander the Great was said to seek God's help in building a gate to contain the satanic people of Gog & Magog (later conflated with Scythians by many authors) away from the rest of humanity. These would later become Khazars & are mentioned in Revelation. https://t.co/0hEP1ortwX
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Naturally, the Germans saw the rise of the Khazars (disguised as Ashkenazi Jews) as a bad sign, associating them directly with Gog and Magog. But a curious thing occurs as well, so-called "blood libel" -- Europe saw an accusation never before levelled against Jewish people... https://t.co/CsG1Gdtxt8
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Ritual murder and blood draining. It would appear that the "Red Jews" would periodically kidnap a small Christian boy and drain him of blood to be used for rites (and baking food). This was actually proven in the case of Simon of Trent (1475) beyond a reasonable doubt. https://t.co/9Kpt3KooLm
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Anyway, back to the topic of the Rothschild: Him and associated Red Jew bankers would gain a lot of power funding wars between Christian nations, funding the end of monarchies and so on. This is well known. One case that deserves close attention is the Russian "revolution". https://t.co/SDyXcpvePO
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
In this war, depicted as a war between a RED army (funded by Rothschild associate Jacob Schiff) and a WHITE army (supported by no one but patriotic Russians themselves). By the end of the war, the entire family of the white emperor were savagely murdered by a Red Jew. https://t.co/q2WlqQhteg
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
As the dust of this disastrous war settled, the Red Jews revealed themselves -- they compromised 80% of what became the Soviet government, as revealed by even Putin himself. They would later commit the red terror, killing up to 1.3 million Christians and starving 10 million more. https://t.co/9unolVCvT9
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
In Europe, after two catastrophic "world" wars, the Red Jews also seemed to dominate. Perched on the eastern coast of the United States' banking capital (NYC), they were untouchable, and later took that nation over too. By the US's hand 10s of millions of people were butchered. https://t.co/TiKmKC2EP2
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
But these direct deaths pale in comparison to the systematic genocide practised by the reds against the whites. Using feminism, mass migration, a debt based economy gone wild & miscegenation media, whites have all but stopped producing babies are are seemingly about to disappear. https://t.co/PBGYYqNfPE
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Or... are we? Who exactly are we anyway. We spoke at length about the mysterious origin of the reds, and narrowed it down to the legend of Gog and Magog. Let's take a surprising turn into whites -- and also why these Red Jews are not Israelites at all. https://t.co/rDK2DaODLp
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
To do that, we're going to return to the Rothschild family. Specifically, Lord Rothschild (LR). LR is known for the Balfour declaration, in which the British government would promise to hand over Palestine to the Zionists, written in 1917 a year before the end of WWI. https://t.co/ogIcvdBIJU
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The Red Jews, in a predictable pattern, would later flood Palestine and commit one of the worst genocides in history (called the Nakba). But here's something you probably didn't know. The same Rothschild would address the British government a second and final time...
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
... asking for raw milk to be banished and for Pasteurisation to be enforced! This was certainly not a decent man -- his nefarious means and ends prove it. So what exactly is the agenda here. Why Palestine when the world was theirs, and why target something so common like milk? https://t.co/UwGWCJ9QMg
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
One of the key strengths of white people lies in their ability to drink milk and digest it effectively thanks to the persistence of lactase enzymes in their body, something the majority of the world lacks. IMPORTANT NOTE: the map is flawed and no data exists in the Levant. https://t.co/07tSbGwRal
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Meanwhile, 75% of Red Jews are lactose intolerant. Milk doesn't work well with them. Pasteurisation, pushed by Lord Rothschild, destroys the Lactase in milk, most beneficial microbiome, and turns milk into -- essentially -- poison that promotes many diseases. https://t.co/vxB8hZrjMc
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The banning of real (raw) milk, turns an advantage into a huge disadvantage for white people. Yet there is an interesting symbolism many would miss if they don't know the history of the world. Let's look at the history of farming in the "middle east", where Armageddon is near...
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
A thousand years after a global catastrophe struck our planet (marked by the Younger Dryas), people emerged out of mountain ranges and immediately started farming on the surface. As evidence will show, they had cattle and drank milk from them -- as reliefs, drawings depict. https://t.co/Vlj7cmZ2CK
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Surviving the hardships of an event that destroys much of the surface necessitates a source of food that is high in nutrient while not requiring much in terms of precursor ingredients. The humble cow or goat is the perfect instrument for such a requirement: Grass to milk!
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
It is no wonder then that these survivors were precisely the kind of people who could sustain themselves on milk alone! As conditions improved, they moved towards more and more arable soul, in the rich continent of Europe. ...The origin of the white man and his white fuel, milk! https://t.co/VHivVtqDQ9
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
The curiosity doesn't end there. The reds are about to go to war with Lebanon. Are you aware of the origin of its name? It means "milky" & "white". Most people attribute this to the snowy Lebanese mountains but this is in fact only half the story! [To be continued in part 2] /End https://t.co/bRjX5tLgXW
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Update: This thread preempted the Red Jews by a few hours. https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-sunday-telegraph/20240623/281848648782098 https://t.co/YtDG3VgaD1
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Part 2: https://t.co/cmUGGwkzWJ
@cirnosad - Korobochka (γ³γγ) π¦πΊβοΈπ·πΊ
Red vs White species. Part 2. Last thread, I spoke about the history of the red species, or "Gog and Magog". Most importantly, their agent Rothschild demanding Palestine & pasteurisation of milk, in England. We'll now dive deeper into the origin of the white species&Lebanon. /𧡠https://t.co/oDxz6AR4ZH
