TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @classicsgroyp
@classicsgroyp - classicsgroyp
Banning TikTok has nothing to do with China: this is one of the few platforms that does not censor countersеmitism and our goverment cannot accept that. Left and right, media/social media are occupiеd, just check the last names. Since power doesn't allow dissent, they just ban it https://t.co/VdHUdNEwsB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jews are prominent in conservative media like Breitbart, PragerU, Daily Wire, BlazeTV, Fox News, and CNN. They hold key positions as owners, CEOs, and on-air personalities. The ADL, a Jewish group, claims influence over social media companies. Criticizing this Jewish presence is labeled as antisemitism, even though it's a fact. This can now be considered a hate crime.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But Jews obviously control the media. That is just true. Take a quick survey of conservative media. I'm a conservative political commentator, so I know this stuff best. You've got Breitbart.
Breitbart is one of the big publications, huge pro in the era of Trump, especially pro Trump publication. Who's the editor of Breitbart? Joel Pollock, a immigrant from South Africa who's also an ethnic Jew who studied Jewish studies at a Jewish university in South Africa. Breitbart was conceived of in Israel and born in America, and its founders were friends with Benjamin Netanyahu, the Jewish prime minister of the Jewish State of Israel. That's Breitbart.
Prager University is one of the biggest youth political programs in the conservative movement. It was founded by Dennis Prager, a Jew who lived in England and worked for Israel for a time. The CEO of Prager University is a Jew who also served in the IDF. She was born in America, but moved to Israel and then worked in the Israeli equivalent of the NSA, and now she's the CEO of PragerU. How about Daily Wire?
Daily Wire has been the number 1 or number 2 publisher on all of Facebook, not just for conservatives or for political people. Number 1 or number 2 publisher on all of Facebook and Instagram for, like, 8 years. Who's the biggest contributor at Daily Wire? Maybe not the owner, but who's the biggest contributor? Ben Shapiro, a Jew, who married a Moroccan, I think, Israeli Jew, died in the wool, Zionist, hardcore support of the Iraq war.
I mean, you name it. So that's just like 3 for 3 right out of the gate. How about BlazeTV? BlazeTV was created with the merger of Blaze Media and CRTV, but Blaze is the main proprietor. Blaze is owned by Glenn Beck.
Glenn Beck cries on TV about how much he loves the Jewish state of Israel. He says, like, he's lucky to be alive so that he can work for the Jewish state of Israel, even though he's not Jewish himself. Fox News, owned by News Corp, is owned by Rupert Murdoch, who is personal friends with Benjamin Netanyahu, And Benjamin Netanyahu, when he visits London, stays with Rupert Murdoch. Rupert Murdoch also owns the New York Post, which is one of the big conservative written publications print publications. So PragerU, Daily Wire, Breitbart, Fox News, New York Post, Blaze TV, all extremely Jewish, all huge Jewish overlap.
Then you go over to CNN, and right out of the gate, Wolf Blitzer, Jake Tapper, Anderson Cooper, all Jewish. Jeff Zucker, the CEO, all Jewish. And it goes on and on and on like this. Sumner Redstone and Bob Iger Sumner Redstone at CBS, Bob Iger at Disney. I mean, just take a look.
They own the media. They of course, they own the media. They're the owners. They're the CEOs. They're the vice presidents.
They're the on air personalities. They are the backers. They were they run it. The ADL, a Jewish group, a subsidiary of the B'nai B'rith Society, which is, connected the state of Israel, they say they have an in with every social media company in America. Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, they pick up the phone, they make a call, they control the terms of service.
So it's all the legacy media. It's all the social media. But if you say that and they say it's a stereotype. If you say the Jews on the media, you're an antisemite. Congratulations.
You're an antisemite. And if you believe that, well, now when you go to court, it's a hate crime if you believe that.
reSee.it AI Summary
The America-Israel relationship has been criticized by Harvard Prof. Stephen Walt for its excessive support without clear benefits. He claims that the Israel lobby influences politicians, potentially leading to another war. The hashtags used express concern for Palestine and criticism towards Israel and its Prime Minister.
@classicsgroyp - classicsgroyp
The "special relationship" between America and Israel will drag us to another war. Harvard Prof. Stephen Walt over 10 years ago on the ridiculous amount of support America gives to Israel without any benefits. The Israel lobby buys our politicians and uses them against us #Israel #IsraelTerorrist #NetanyahuWarCriminal #hospital #PalestineGenocide #Palestinian #GazaAttack #Gaza #PrayForPalestine
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel receives significant economic and military aid from the US, even when it takes actions that the US opposes. The usual explanation for this support is that Israel is a strategic asset and a democracy that shares American values. However, these arguments do not fully justify the extent of aid provided. While Israel is a democracy, its treatment of Arabs and its colonization of the West Bank contradict American values. The historical case for Israel's existence based on anti-Semitism does not warrant unconditional support. The main reason for Israel's privileged position is believed to be the influence of the Israel lobby.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because the special relationship between the United States and Israel affects all of us. Israel is the largest recipient of US economic and military aid, getting about $500 per year for each Israeli citizen even though it is now a prosperous country with a per capita income that is 29th in the world. Moreover, it gets this aid even when it does things that the United States opposes and that tend to generate anti American sentiment, like building settlements in the occupied territories. Israel gets gets consistent diplomatic support from the United States, and it's rarely criticized by American officials and certainly not by anyone who's running for high office. The question is why.
Now the usual answer is that Israel is a strategic asset and a democracy that shares our values. But those arguments can't explain why we give it so much help and with so few strings attached. Israel may have been a strategic asset during the Cold War, but the Cold War is now over. Today, providing unconditional support is not making the United States more popular or making American citizens more secure. So the strategic argument isn't convincing.
It's true that Israel is a vibrant democracy, but the status of its own Arab and its 40 year campaign to colonize the West Bank is sharply at odds with American values. My point, by the way, is not that Israel acts worse than other countries, only that it doesn't act significantly better. And so one cannot justify unconditional support by saying that Israel's behavior is somehow exemplary. There is, in our view, a strong moral case for Israel's existence based on the long history of antisemitism, but past crimes against the Jewish people do not justify giving Israel a blank check today. So what really explains Israel's privileged position?
In our view, it's primarily due to the Israel lobby.
@classicsgroyp - classicsgroyp
Vote Trump, Save America 🇺🇸 #IowaCaucus #VoteTrump #MAGA https://t.co/ycgCSIQzZk
Video Transcript AI Summary
I don't know how it happened, but it's unbelievable. We just witnessed something incredible in football. Donald Trump, you are the best.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wait a minute. We gotta get a word. No. How did you do that? I don't know.
I have no idea. Who says there's not luck in football? You are the best. One time, everybody. Donald Trump.
Unbelievable.
@classicsgroyp - classicsgroyp
The main issue for any religion is that Christ is King ✝️ uploading again since free speech X thinks this clip is hateful lol Ye defends that only Christians should be in positions of power in America and notices that there's one group that is undeservingly overrepresented lol https://t.co/ae8bM3MdQu
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that the main issue for any religion is that Jesus Christ is the true King. They believe that anyone who doesn't believe in Christ should not have any influence in America, including in media, technology, politics, farming, medicine, and prisons. When asked about the treatment of Jews, the speaker suggests that Jews should not be in charge of everything and should work for Christians instead. They express a willingness to hire a Jewish person if they can ensure they are not a spy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the the main the main issue for any religion the main issue is that Christ is King. Christ is the true King of Israel. Christ is the King of all kings. If you don't believe in Jesus Christ, you are wrong. And anyone that doesn't believe in Jesus Christ should not be in control or any influence to anything that America produces.
Be it media, technology, politics, farming, medicine, prisons. If you do not believe in Christ and you're not following Christ and the decisions that you make, you should have no influence on that.
Speaker 1: Well, that's going to be a tough thing to institute. So so you're president of the United States. The the Hitler thing does not hurt your campaign.
Speaker 0: 1st, it helps my campaign.
Speaker 1: Okay. Helps your campaign. You're in office and it's day 1 and they go, someone walks in and they go, so what are we going to do with these Jews? What do you say?
Speaker 0: What do you mean do about them? What do you mean?
Speaker 1: Is there any action involved? Like they they're overly represented and met lots So people who don't believe in Christ. I would, I would probably wager that in your average hospital in New York, maybe a third or less believe in Christ. So are you suggesting we get rid of 2 thirds of the doctors?
Speaker 0: Not get rid of like not violently get rid of them. I think that Jews are very intelligent, but they don't deserve to be in charge of everything because they don't put Christ And
Speaker 1: how do you legislate that?
Speaker 0: They need to work for Christians. Jews should work for Christians. I'll hire a Jewish person in a second. If I knew they weren't a spy and I could look through their phone and follow them to their house and have a camera all in their living room.
reSee.it AI Summary
22 years ago, Alex Jones predicted nuclear war due to Israel. Today, the same players fuel bloodlust and desire for war. Chaos, crisis, and terrorism persist, strengthening the Zionist Occupation Government. Little has changed since 9/11. #IsraelPalestineWar #TelAviv #Mossad
@classicsgroyp - classicsgroyp
We're going to have nuclear war because of Israel - Alex Jones 22 years ago. We have the same players, same blood lust, and desire for war. They bring chaos, crisis, and terrorism to establish a police state. Little changed since 9/11. If anything, ZOG is stronger. AJ was right #IsraelPalestineWar #TelAviv #Israel #Mossad #Palestine #Gaza #Netanyahu #Jerusalem #Zionist #Hamas #IronDome #HamasAttack #IsraelPalestineWar #USSLiberty #IsraelAtWar
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about the support given to Israel, suggesting that it may lead to nuclear war. They claim that Israel mistreats Palestinians, referring to them as subhuman and describing incidents of violence. The speaker also criticizes Arab governments for their involvement in this situation, suggesting a larger agenda of creating chaos to justify a dictatorial regime.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't support the Palestinians either. They're all hyped up and psychotic, but Israel's gonna get us nuked always backing them up like this. Israel calls the Palestinians or cattle or dogs or subhuman. They keep them on concentration camps. I've got video of them taking Palestinian women's tomatoes they grow and breaking their water containers and stealing.
That that's why you have this crap and our children are gonna die. We're gonna get nuked because of this. Iran's got the nukes now. Syria. We're gonna have nuclear war because Israel likes to go around bombing everybody.
I'm sorry. It's just the facts. And Israel absolutely is beside itself for joy right now. They are talking about how they're going to blow everything up, how they're going to attack everybody, and guess who's going to get bombed because of it? I have been supportive of Israel for many years.
When I find out what they do, shooting little Palestinian children in the genitalia and laughing, it's on video, Little 10 year olds walking around throwing rocks at tanks. The guy's just off a half mile away and blows their testicles off. They call them goyim. They call them dogs. They call the Arabs cattle.
And then the Arab governments that are in league with this government, it's really a sick, Hegelian dialectic order out of chaos, bringing the world crises, bringing them terrorism so we'll accept a highly dictatorial police state regime. It's happening.
reSee.it AI Summary
Right-wing politicians promise to end immigration but align with Netanyahu, failing to deliver. Israel's policies create Middle East instability, forcing us to take in refugees. They seek sovereignty while imposing multiculturalism on us. Learn more about Nick Fuentes on cozy.tv/nick and rumble.com/nickjfuentes.
@classicsgroyp - classicsgroyp
The based populist trap: these right-wing politicians promise an end to immigration but align themselves to Netanyahu. They won't deliver. Israel's policies destabilize the Middle East: they make the refugees and make us take them. Sovereignty for Israel, multiculturalism for us More Nick Fuentes on cozy.tv/nick and https://rumble.com/nickjfuentes
Video Transcript AI Summary
Orban, Maloney, and Wilders in Europe oppose immigration, but they fail to acknowledge that the refugee crisis in 2015 was caused by Israel and Saudi Arabia's proxy war in Syria and the NATO coalition's war against Gaddafi in 2011. The destabilization of Syria and Libya led refugees to move through Turkey and Libya into Europe, with the help of Jewish NGOs. These politicians claim to support Israel and the Jewish people while rejecting Middle Eastern refugees. However, the solution lies in creating stable countries in the Middle East, including a Palestinian state and maintaining Bashar al Assad's presidency in Syria. This contradicts the Likud government's policies in Israel, which supports these anti-migrant politicians while destabilizing the countries that produce the migrant crisis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's more, especially in Europe, Orban and Maloney and Deere Wilders, they're all against immigration. Well, guess who caused the refugee crisis in Europe in 2015? Israel. It was Israel and Saudi Arabia's proxy war in Syria, as well as the NATO coalition war against Gaddafi in 2011 that created the refugee crisis. When Syria destabilized, they moved through Turkey into Europe.
When Libya destabilized, they moved through Libya across the mad into Europe and Jewish NGOs brought them. And Geer Wilders and Orban and Maloney, on one side of their mouth, say, well, we're against the migrants. We can't take any more migrants. On the other side, they wave the Israel flag. We love Israel.
We love the Jewish people. Well, hang on a second. If you don't want refugees from the Middle East, you know how you stop getting them, you have stable countries in the Middle East, which means a Palestinian state, which means Bashar al Assad must remain the president of Syria. But that directly contradicts the policy of the Lykud government in Israel, which is the same government that's backing all these governments. The Netanyahu regime is backing Orban.
The Netanyahu regime is backing Maloney. They're backing Wilders. They're backing anti migrant politicians while at the same time, They are destabilizing the countries that are producing the migrant crisis. So Netanyahu backs Orban and Orban says no refugees. Then Netanyahu destabilizes Syria, and they all leave Syria, and they try to get into
Nicholas J. Fuentes
Browse the most recent videos from channel "Nicholas J. Fuentes" uploaded to Rumble.com
rumble.com
reSee.it AI Summary
"Contrary to the notion that diversity saved us, we built a great country that your ancestors couldn't have. Check out Jared Taylor and AmRen for more insights. #diversity #history"
@classicsgroyp - classicsgroyp
What you're saying is somehow Whites were about to choke to death on their own homogeneity when people like yourself kindly arrived in diversity and saved us from ourselves. No we built a wonderful country that your ancestors could not have been. That's why ppl like you come here Jared Taylor and AmRen at https://rumble.com/c/c-4280622
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses concern about the perceived dispossession of white people in various aspects of society. Speaker 1 argues that this is not dispossession but rather an expansion of equality and civil rights. Speaker 0 counters by referencing the first citizenship law, which aimed to reserve naturalization for free white persons. Speaker 1 acknowledges the flaws of America's founding fathers but emphasizes the ideal of equality for all. Speaker 0 disagrees, suggesting that the arrival of diverse populations will change the country his ancestors built. Speaker 1 concludes the conversation, acknowledging the time taken.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is precisely what I've been describing, the ultimate dispossession of whites. It will come culturally, politically, artistically, musically, demographically. You are describing the very thing that you would probably never permit or never countenance if we were discussing some non white country. Imagine, imagine whites or any other non Mexican group were pouring into Mexico Mexico, more likely to commit crimes, more likely to go on welfare, demanding ballot papers in English. School initially.
Speaker 1: That Mexico is the same as America. The the countries were founded in very different ways. They were created in very different ways with with different ideals.
Speaker 0: In other words, what you're saying is because America and all white countries are inhabited by white people, dispossession is good for us but it doesn't work for anybody else. That's what you're arguing.
Speaker 1: I don't see it as dispossession. I see it as an expansion of equality. I see it as an expansion of civil rights and equality On the very found the very ideas on which the country was founded because America as you're America as you are talking about it is a stagnant identity. It is a place in time, but America, in the way that it's always existed, is an ideal. It's a it's it's a it's a it's progress.
It is a
Speaker 0: The very first citizenship law passed in 17/90 by the very first congress reserved naturalization to free white persons of good character. They wanted a white country. They wanted a white country. They continued to want a white country for the 1965. What you're saying is completely revisionist.
The idea that America's founded on, it's up for grabs. Come on, come off. That's complete nonsense.
Speaker 1: I never said it was up Progress.
Speaker 0: Well, that's the plight in what you're saying.
Speaker 1: The idea of America in terms of working towards an ideal of equality in which all men are created equal, in which All communities have access to the same resources, the chance for life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, that is the idea. I I know very well our founding fathers were slave
Speaker 0: Earth. Yes.
Speaker 1: And I know very well that they probably did not imagine that America would be today what it is.
Speaker 0: However appalled by the idea. Furthermore, what you're saying what you're saying is somehow whites were about to choke to death on their own homogeneity when people like yourself kindly arrived from diversity and saved us from ourselves. No. We built a wonderful country that your ancestors could not have been. That is why people like you come here and the more you come in larger numbers, you will change the country my ancestors built into something else and it is completely normal for me to wish to oppose that.
Speaker 1: Mr. Taylor, I've taken enough of your time.
American Renaissance
Browse the most recent videos from channel "American Renaissance" uploaded to Rumble.com
rumble.com
reSee.it AI Summary
White conservatives are not inherently racist. It is crucial to address race in politics, as it shapes our future. Let's challenge the taboo and foster dialogue. Check out Joel Davis' insightful work and show your support. [link]
@classicsgroyp - classicsgroyp
Are White conservatives racist? No, they're not, and it's our job to make them racists @joeldavisx. Race is the most important issue in our political process, the one that guarantees a future to our people, and the one that is completely forbidden. Let's radicalize our side 🔥 Find Joel's great work and support him here https://bio.link/joeldavis
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the left are the real racists because they hate white people, while conservatives are not racist. They believe that conservatives need to become more aware of race and embrace racial identitarianism. The goal is to convert normal white conservatives by making them see the racial issues and join their side. They emphasize the importance of developing a larger group of sympathizers who can bring about real change in social institutions. The speaker suggests that the left succeeded by building a focused and direct ideology, and conservatives should adopt similar tactics. They believe that the racial issue is the most important and should be the main focus of conservative messaging. The speaker concludes by stating that securing a future for their race is the central issue in society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another hot take that I wanna give you is that the left are the real racists, but not in the way that Dinesh D'Souza describes it in the sense that the left hate white people, obviously. Right? They are actually racist. Where conservatives, they're not racist. That's the problem.
I wish the right were the real racists. That's our job, is to make that happen. And that's key because, you know, we're not really gonna be able to convert leftists. Leftists are already aware of race. They're fully aware of race and they've chosen the other side.
Where conservatives are sleepwalking through reality. Like, they just don't like, literally, they are color blind, and And they can't perceive reality as a result of it because these mental blocks put in the heads of so many people through, you know, the way that people have been conditioned by our culture. Our job is to open their eyes to race. Once you see it, you know, you see it everywhere, then all of a sudden the political, the political landscape makes sense. And if someone is already identifying on the right, unless they it's because they have an Asian girlfriend or wife or something or whatever that's Really holding them back from embracing racial identitarianism.
If there's a normal white person who, you know, sees themselves as right wing and They're sick of the tranny nonsense and all the immigrants and so on. You know, once they see it, they can't unsee it and then they're on our aside. And that's really, that's the activist sympathizer relationship. Our job is developing a larger and larger cadre of sympathizers that will then permeate social institutions, and that's how you get real change because, you know, that's what the Left did. The Left didn't win opinion polls.
They didn't, You know, get one day to 51% of the population now thinks that transgenderism is real and not a mental illness. Now we can do the trans agenda. No. They knew that their ideas were unpopular, but they built a cadre of sympathizers with a focused and direct ideology, and look where that's got them. You know, we can do opinion polls on the key issues that we care about and the people are with us, but they're not focused.
They're not, they don't put it as the number one priority in their politics. They aren't, kind of convicted like the people in this room are around these issues. And so, so much of what we're doing is not just like winning them over to agreeing with us, but it's about radicalizing them, about making them more angry, making them more focused, Making them more racist, basically. That's really, like, the essence of what the activist is doing because what's happening to our people, what's happening to our race is really a crisis of the will. You know, the majority of our race is demoralized.
It's not as if it's an intellectual thing and, you know, everyone has been ideologically Convinced in this abstract way, they've heard all the arguments from Ben Shapiro and, you know, they're not interested in our movement. No, it's, it's based in these kind of more primal emotional states of fear, of, as I said, demoralization, self hatred, and so on, these mental blocks that are placed in this kind of pre rational state. And so much of what we're doing is about energizing the will. Because our job isn't to work out all the problems of the government and come up with a complete policy stack about what our foreign policy and tax policy and all of these things need to be. Our job is to represent the pro white viewpoint.
And, you know, the activists, the advantage of the activists, going back to the feminist movement as an example, they didn't have to come to the government. They didn't see themselves necessary necessarily coming to the state with a full set of this is how the government should run and we should be in charge of the government. They just go, This is the feminist core issues. This is what we believe. This is what our complaints are.
And they hammer those points. And I think in many ways, our movement would be would be well served by adopting some of those tactics in our messaging because all the other issues are represented except the racial issue. That's the 1 issue that always gets jettisoned by conservatives, and they want to focus on anything else that they possibly can, because that's the one issue that you get targeted for the most, obviously. And so, you know, My stance more recently has been to really just try to avoid talking about almost anything else but, white advocacy, whenever I Do anything, basically. Just be like a 100% sphug about it 20 fourseven and just not even allow myself to Think outside that box almost to constrain myself to, like, maximize the amount of output that I have on this one issue because it's The glaring obvious central issue at the core of everything was more important than anything else, frankly, in the entire Political process right now and in society is securing a future for our people.
Joel Davis Links
Australian Nationalist
bio.link
@classicsgroyp - classicsgroyp
"Listen up, White man. There are a lot of people out there who hate you, and they hate you because you are White. Some of them openly want you dead. Many of them preach tolerance and inclusion — just not for you" gotta absolutely LOVE Jared Taylor ❤️🔥❤️🔥 take your own side! https://t.co/tIEnkuU3pX
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: At some point, many people will hate you for what you've done. Despite preaching inclusivity, they won't include you. The majority still holds power, and we allow it because we take sides in arguments. No one will understand our perspective.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Luister, op een gegeven moment, er zijn veel mensen die je haat. En ze haat je omdat je zullen ze openen wat je deed. Velen prediken en inclusie, maar niet voor jou. Het is nog steeds een meerderheid in deze wereld, maar we laten dit gebeuren, omdat we onze eigen kant in een argument nemen. En niemand gaat ons eigen vorm