reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @concernedctxn
@CONCERNEDCTXN - 🦍
@CodeMonkeyZ - Ron
Remember the plane crash a few years ago in Hawaii where the only person who died also happened to the clerk that verified Obama's birth certificate as real? https://t.co/bOWygSpLmy
@concernedctxn - 🤐🇺🇸
@dom_lucre THIS SHOULD BE TRENDING NEWS RIGHT NOW❗ Candace Owens exposed the picture of the lady Kamala Harris took a picture with, claiming it was her Jamaican grandma died four years before Kamala was born. How's this even possible? They lied about everything👇 https://t.co/YQlvA6RJuP
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims Kamala Harris misrepresented her family history in her book. They present a death certificate for Beryl, Harris's grandmother, showing she died in 1960 from a uterine infection at age 39. The speaker questions how Harris could have a photo with Beryl, given Beryl's death predates Harris's birth.
The speaker suggests the woman Harris identifies as Beryl in a photo resembles Harris's great-grandmother, Iris Finnegan, and appears older than 39. The speaker speculates the woman in the photo may have been "the help" due to a perceived lack of affection in the photo and Harris's family history as descendants of Irish slavers in Jamaica. The speaker questions if Harris is passing off people who became like family as relatives. They state that Harris descends from wealthy Irish slavers who owned over 1,000 slaves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As speculated, we were able to confirm that Kamala's black grandmother that she showed us in that picture died in 1960 before Kamala was born. I can show you right now her death certificate. Let's take a look at Beryl's death certificate, which confirms. As you can see there, it says that she died in July of 1960. It also tells us on the right hand side, you guys probably have to zoom in on this, but she died of, a uterine infection, uterine fibroids due to a hysterectomy.
It has her listed as 39 years. That's actually a couple of years off from 1917, so somebody may have gotten their math wrong here. But you once again see that it lists her birthplace as Saint Anne. And so this is a huge scandal. Just an absolutely huge scandal.
Kamala Harris, published in her book, that she was standing next to her grandma Beryl. But grandma Beryl died in 1960, 4 years before Kamala Harris was born. So who the hell is the real Beryl? Who is that woman standing next to Kamala Harris? And do you know what I noticed about that woman standing next to her?
She looks a lot like the woman that Kamala claims in her book is her great grandmother, Iris. Now that's Iris Finnegan. Here's the book with my great grandmother, Iris Finnegan, in Jamaica. Now I'm gonna give you the side by side of Iris and her alleged daughter, Beryl, who died at 39. Now that woman on the right is not 39 years old.
She's clearly much more advanced in her age. I mean, we know black don't crack. I mean, that's just a scientific fact. So I would put that woman, on the right hand side who she tried to pass off as Beryl and I think is the exact same person. I would say that that woman looks to be about 60 5.
And then it looks like she's more advanced on the left hand side, the great grandmother. That's the same person. When I just believe my own eyes, we're looking at the same person. What do you guys think when you look at those photos? How the hell does a person who is the vice president of the United States pass off a book, claim that these people that are in her book are her black relatives, and nobody bats an eyelash or does even a peripheral search to recognize that the woman that she put forth is implausibly her grandmother.
And by the way, I'm gonna say this and people can be offended. But the first thing that I thought when I saw the photo of her sitting on her great grandmother's lap was that this doesn't look like a grandparent affection going on here. Like, this woman looks like she could be working for the family. Quite literally, I thought to myself, this woman looks like she could be the help. And I thought that because there's a lack of affection there.
Do you know what I mean? But there's no, like and and in both of the photos, there's a lack of affection. It's just like a woman standing next to her and I obviously know that that was a circumstance. When you're talking about a family that had a ton of plantations, which is the reality, she descends from Irish slavers. That is a fact that Kamala Harris cannot deny.
She descends from wealthy Irish slavers who virtually owned they did own the town. They named the town. It was Hamilton town, then it was Brown's town in Jamaica. He had over 1,000 slaves. Okay?
It would follow that there would be help around the house. And I'm just gonna put here as a question mark, not as a fact. If they're looking at some of these photos of people who became like family and they're trying to pass them off like relatives Again, not a fact, a huge question mark, but my instinct tells me that that person is actually not her family member. And if it is, well, Kamala's got some explaining to do. How did she meet grandma Beryl almost 20 years after grandma Beryl died?
Kamala Harris looks to be about 20 in that photo that she presented. Then there's an another bit of a
@concernedctxn - 🤐🇺🇸
Kamala Harris doesn't want you to see this, Dems don't want this to go viral👇 You know what to do🤝 https://t.co/ktHA0dfeQU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala Harris is considered inspiring and capable. She has been rated as the most liberal senator by GovTrack. She is prepared to get rid of the filibuster to pass a Green New Deal and favors banning fracking and offshore drilling.
Her solution for voters in the fossil fuel industry is to give the workers an ability to transition. She believes that people who are undocumented crossing the border should not be treated as criminals and is open to abolishing ICE and starting from scratch.
She believes it is wrong-headed to think that more police officers are the only way to make communities safe. She would support changing the dietary guidelines to reduce red meat consumption. Harris believes that people convicted in prison, even on death row, should be able to vote, and she supports a mandatory buyback program. She is opposed to any policy that would deny any human being public health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kamala Harris is inspiring and very capable. The more people get to know her, they're gonna be particularly impressed by her ability.
Speaker 1: The nonpartisan, GovTrack, has rated you as the most liberal senator. I am prepared to get rid of the filibuster to pass a green new deal. There's no question I'm in favor of banning fracking. Would you ban offshore drilling? Yes.
Speaker 0: What is the solution for voters in the fossil fuel industry?
Speaker 1: Giving the workers an ability to transition. We're not gonna treat people who are undocumented cross border as criminals. That's correct.
Speaker 2: Raise your hand if you think it should be a civil offense rather than a crime across the border without documentation.
Speaker 1: Abolish ICE. Yeah. Is that a position you agree with? And we need to probably think about starting from scratch. Outdated.
It is wrong headed thinking to think that the only way you're gonna get communities to be safe is put more police officers on the street. Would you support changing the dietary guidelines? Yes. The, you know, the food care. What the people are doing with it?
Yes. Yes. To reduce red meat specifically. Yes.
Speaker 2: People who are convicted in prison, like the Boston Marathon, on death row, people who are convicted of sexual assault, they should be able to vote?
Speaker 1: I think we should have that conversation. We have to have a buyback program, and I support a mandatory buyback program.
Speaker 2: So for people out there who like their insurance, they don't get to keep it?
Speaker 1: Let's eliminate all of that. Let's move on. I am opposed to any policy that would deny any human being public health, period.
Speaker 0: The more people get to know her, they're gonna be particularly impressed by her ability.
@concernedctxn - 🤐🇺🇸
If this was aired on all MSM governments around the world would be faced with an utter crisis. https://t.co/dnAbMXF1D4
Video Transcript AI Summary
A peer-reviewed study by scientists in Japan and South Korea cultured COVID vaccines (mainly Pfizer and Moderna) and observed the development of nanostructures using stereo microscopes. Initially, 2D nanostructures formed, later becoming 3D.
Observed structures included spirals and other formations, some as large as 10 micrometers, that spontaneously assembled. The researchers suggest these findings indicate the presence of nanotechnology in the injectables and warrant explanation from manufacturers and authorizing agencies. The study documented real-time injuries at the cellular level in recipients.
The analysis revealed 3 to 4 million self-assembling entities per milliliter, ranging from 1 to 100 micrometers, including worm-like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, and right-angled structures. Incubation studies showed simple structures evolving into complex 3D entities over 2-3 weeks, resembling carbon nanotube filaments and beaded chains. The researchers infer a potential pathophysiological mechanism for adverse reactions and call for further research. The study was published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A warm welcome to this talk. It's Friday, 6th September. Now I've heard about this phenomena years ago, of course, but only just got some evidence to support it. So we can only just report on it now. This is from peer reviewed literature, and it's scientists based in Japan and South Korea.
And what they've done is they've taken COVID vaccines, mostly Pfizer and Moderna, and cultured them, incubated them to try and duplicate the conditions in the human body, and they found nanostructures have developed. Now I don't expect you're gonna watch this video or or be allowed to watch this video, but I'm gonna do it anyway. And if by some chance a few of you actually get to see it, then that's brilliant. Now here's the equipment that was actually used here. It's stereo microscopes.
Now basically, all this means is you're looking at it in the 2 eyes. Therefore, you get stereoscopic vision. And what happened was that initially, they developed 2 dimensional nanostructures, and then the sun became 3-dimensional as well. And, of course, you can see that with a stereo stereoscopic microscope. Let's go and then look at some now.
That was the equipment that they were using. And, of course, these days, you don't so much look down the microscope. It all goes on a screen, so you can take, copies of it. Now these are from the publication. These are the some of the nano structures that were observed in, as I've said before, conditions that were designed to duplicate human cells in the human body that developed from the COVID vaccines, the m r the mRNA vaccines.
Now the scale here, we'll we'll look well, I'll just show you a couple of pictures and we'll look at the scale. So these are the sort of structures that we're they were finding. I mean, what the heck is that? You know, that that is a structure that spontaneously, sort of put itself together, a spontaneous assembly of this structure from the COVID vaccine, cultures. Now the scale here, 10 10 micrometers.
So that's so one one micrometer would be, 1 micrometer would be, the size of a sort of a bacterial cell. 7 micrometers would be the size of a red blood cell. So you can see these are nanostructures, but this is a very detailed looking structure that spontaneously assembled itself here. Really quite, really quite, yeah. Well, look at it.
You know, that that that spontaneously assembled itself. What the heck is it? Now, of course, as always, we don't have I won't be giving full answers to these questions. Read the paper for yourself. But this this this means the presence of these Nanostructures needs to be explained by the manufacturers and by international authorizing agencies and national authorizing agencies around the world.
This is a peer reviewed publication, and I believe it gives questions to be answered. Even if it's only that this is a load of rubbish, then that still needs to be still needs to be answered. Let's look at a couple more pictures before we look at the text. So these spiral ones seem to come up. Again, spontaneously, just put themselves together, spontaneous sort of another spiral there, another one there.
Tell you what, I don't like the idea of these spontaneously forming in the cells of my body if that is indeed the case. We don't know that. But if that's the case, I don't like the idea of it at all. Not at all. And 10 micrometers, that's actually pretty big actually.
That's the scale there, 10 micrometers. So this this whole thing is actually is actually quite large, relatively speaking. And what is that? Spontaneously formed structure. Well, that one.
Anyway, lots more examples in the paper. Do, look at it for yourself and check it out. The the paper is there and the pictures are all there. Now, as I say, I don't think many people are gonna be able to watch this video because I'm not optimistic about getting a wide distribution, shall we say. But never mind, we're gonna do it anyway.
So real time self assembly self assembly, these things are bolting themselves together as it were, of stereo stoic stereo microscopically visible. So you can see them through the stereo microscope. Specimens of mRNA products, mainly from Pfizer and Moderna, a comprehensive longitudinal study. So construction in constructions in incubated specimens of mRNA products is what these workers did. And our observation suggests the presence of some kind of nanotechnology in the COVID injectables.
Now I'm I know what I'm I know this is sounds pretty, interesting material, and I'm only I'm being very, very, very careful not to go outside of what the article is saying, the peer reviewed article is saying. And, of course, I'll be giving you full references and everything for that. So I'm being very careful in this in this video not to go outside what it's saying. Observable observable real time injuries at cellular level in the recipients of the safe and effective COVID 19 injectables are documented here for the first time, hence the fact that we're doing it. I think this paper just came out a few days ago, last week maybe, with the presentation of a comprehensive description and analysis of observed phenomena that need to be explained.
The global administration of these often mandated products from late 2020 triggered a plethora of independent research studies. Why weren't they nationally sponsored and industry sponsored research studies? Why is it down to independent scientists? And I have talked to, several other independent scientists who've come up with similar findings to this, but I'm can't talk about those because it's not published in the peer reviewed literature. We're gonna stick to what is in the peer reviewed literature of modified RNA injectable gene therapies.
So, of course, they're injecting genetic material, instructing the body to make foreign proteins. They are not injecting the protein directly. Most noticeably, those manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna in this paper. Analysis report analyses reported here consists of precise laboratory bench science aiming to understand why serious, debilitating, prolonged injuries and many other side of this particular adverse reaction occurred increasingly without any measurable protective effect. The contents of the COVID 19 injectables were examined under a stereoscopic microscope up to 400 times magnification.
Carefully preserved specimens were cultured in a range of distinct media, to observe immediate and long term cause and effect relationships between the injectables and living cells under carefully controlled conditions. In other words, I'm not saying these scientists succeeded in doing that, but what they were trying to do is duplicate living conditions in the laboratory bench where they could look at it under these microscopes. They were attempting to duplicate the physiological conditions of the human body. The degree to which they did that, I'm not really able to adjudicate on, but they they did their best to do that. And, again, this needs to be duplicated around the world, and it needs to be explained because I mean, hey.
I mean, let's look at that. I mean, look at it. I mean, what is that? What are these things? I mean, it's just yeah.
An explanation is clearly, required here. I would have thought. I would have thought. Let me know what you think. Anyway, let's carry on carefully control conditions.
From such research, reasonable inferences can be drawn about observed injuries. So they're saying that it's reasonable. The the the researchers here are saying it's reasonable to, make inferences from what they're seeing in the laboratory to what will be happening in the body because they're trying to duplicate the conditions in the body. Of course, the study should be done in the body as well. This should be a a a great trigger for future research done by authorized institutions around the world and regulatory bodies around the world.
This should be done to explain this. Don't hold your breath. Right. From such research, reasonable inferences can be drawn about observed injuries worldwide that have occurred since the injectables were pressed upon billions of individuals. So they're saying that this basically, what they're saying is, I think, this is a pathophysiological mechanism that could explain the adverse reactions or some of the adverse reactions that we are tragically seeing.
And, of course, we've interviewed quite a few people now on this channel who suffered from this as well. In addition to cellular toxicity, if that wasn't bad enough, our findings reveal numerous on the order of 3 to 4 so that's between that's that's 10 to the 6th. That's, 3 to 4000000 of these artifacts per mil of the injectable. Heck, that's 4. That's 4.
1, 2, 3. 1, 2, 3. Up to up to 4,000,000. Between 3,400,000,000. Dear me.
Visible artifacts, self assembling entities, self assembling entities, ranging from about 1 micrometer to about a 100 micrometers, 100 microns, or greater of many different shapes. As we said, 1 me 1 micrometer is about the size of a bacterial cell. If you've got good young eyes, you could probably just about see an object of a 100 micrometers. It's a 10th tenth of a millimeter, isn't it, with the naked eye at at a push. I probably couldn't at my age, but maybe with my glasses.
Anyway, the art researchers go on. They were animated worm like entities, disc, chains, spirals, tubes, right angled right angled structures. Right angled structures containing other artifacts, artifactual entities within them. Artifacts within artifacts. All these are exceedingly beyond any expected and acceptable level of contamination of the COVID 19 injectables.
I would have thought 3,000,000 to 4,000,000 per million is way off the scale indeed. An incubation studies revealed the progressive self assembly self assembly of many artifactual structures. What the heck are they? As time progressed during incubation, simple 1 and 2 dimensional structures over 2 or 3 weeks became more complex in shape and size developing into stereoscopically visible entities in 3 dimensions. These became three-dimensional structures in their incubated cultures designed to replicate the conditions inside the human body.
They resembled, carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, tapes, some appearing as transparent thin flat membranes, others as three-dimensional spiral beaded chains. Some of these seem to appear then disappear over time. Our observations suggest the presence of some kind of nanotechnology in the COVID 19 injectables. Now this is directly from peer reviewed literature. I don't expect you'll see it.
I suspect strongly that I am currently talking to myself in a backroom in Carlisle somewhere. If some of you do get to see it, then we consider that a bonus. You can think about it. Now I'll just give you some of the references here for this. So this is the, this is the journal here, International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.
The International Journal of Theory, Practice and Research is a peer reviewed, scholarly open access journal concerning the development, distribution and monitoring of vaccines and their components. All content is freely available without charge to the user or hisher institution, which, of course, is excellent. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link the full text of articles or use them for any other lawful purpose. Permission is not required from the publisher nor from the author, but we do give them full credit, of course. Isn't this refreshing?
This is our work. We're reporting on it, and it's it's free. It's in the public domain. It is the antithesis of the control of the control agenda that so often we've seen with people not wanting to release papers for decades after the research was been done. Very refreshing.
So that is about the journal there. The actual article itself is, have we got the article itself? Where do I go? Oh, there we go. That's the that's the journal there.
That's the full journal. And, again, you can download the full journal. Quite, excellent. So that's the paper. That's the journal.
I've downloaded in PDF, of course, and that's the attribution noncommercial, non directive deed. I quite fully understand that. But it it just it's great that it's basically, share. You are free to share, and it's it's just, it's it's just and, of course, we give full credit to the authors, which I will do now. These are the authors here.
Physician, doctor Yong Mai Lee, Republic of Korea, and, professor brow Braude, Okinawa Christian University, Japan. Of course, the links, as always, are there to check them out for yourself. So what we've done is report on a peer reviewed paper. It's in the scientific literature as we've completely demonstrated in this video. Just sorry that, I suspect that not many of you will get to watch this video, but there we go.
Yeah. Isn't that transparency refreshing and really refreshing to see that? This is our work. Look at it. Share it.
Agree with it. Disagree with it. Do further work to prove it. Do further work to say it's a load of rubbish, but it's there open for public peer analysis. Brilliant.
The antithesis to so much of the more commercial research of the past few years decades. But for now, look up the paper for yourself. Let me know what you think if any of you actually get to see it. So bye. Hope I'm not talking to myself, but thank you for watching if somehow you have.
@concernedctxn - 🤐🇺🇸
@LeadingReport Everyone should watch this and know - ALL THESE PEOPLE ARE EVIL AND BELONG IN PRISON👇 https://t.co/0xfCUSJ3D8
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's okay to be afraid of COVID dominating your life, and everyone should be afraid of COVID. We won't be free of this pandemic until we listen to the acknowledged truth and the scientists. Science is truth. Questioning science impacts public health and prolongs economic hardship.
Someone not wearing a mask is perceived as a threat, selfish, a COVID denier, and unvaccinated. Seek out scientists, listen to their advice, and trust the experts. Republicans have given their voters license to believe whatever they want. Don't listen to Trump, a nonmedical professional, but listen to Bill Gates.
The science checks out, and eventually, the science catches up with you. Trust the vaccine and the medical experts. If you don't understand the science, let the experts speak. Don't take advice from your golf buddy or aunt; listen to the scientists and stop saying, "I need to do my own research."
If we follow science, people can hug their grandchildren. This isn't about freedom, but freedom for your neighbors. You can hug each other if fully vaccinated. Listen to the scientists because the science works.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It dominate your life? In terms of responding to to a comment like that, it's gross. It's okay to be afraid of COVID, and it's okay that that it's dominating your life.
Speaker 1: Everyone should be afraid of COVID.
Speaker 2: You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.
Speaker 3: I can't come in, mom. It it's there it's because of this flu thing.
Speaker 2: We won't be free of this pandemic until we listen to the acknowledged truth. Listen to the scientists.
Speaker 1: Science is truth. You know, science is truth. What is the impact to public health when people are openly questioning the science? Now is the time to do what you're told. By not hearing the truth, by not listening to the scientists, they are prolonging how bad the economy will be.
When I
Speaker 4: see somebody out in the world who's not wearing a mask, I instantly think you are a somebody out in the world
Speaker 1: who's not
Speaker 4: wearing a mask, I'd instantly think you are a threat, or you are selfish, or you are a COVID denier, and you definitely haven't been vaccinated. Do you know where a mask? Face mask. No.
Speaker 1: What does it say? Are you vaccinated?
Speaker 5: I am triple vaccinated.
Speaker 1: So why are you wearing the mask?
Speaker 3: Seek out the scientists and listen to their advice.
Speaker 1: Listen to scientists. Listen to the scientists.
Speaker 3: Trust the experts.
Speaker 1: We're gonna trust science. We're gonna trust the experts. Parents who say, well, I need to do my own research. Make you think of that cartoon I saw of the tombstone that said, I did my own research.
Speaker 3: Republicans have given their voters license to believe whatever they want to believe. Heard somebody saying, listen to the scientists. Do that.
Speaker 1: Let's listen to the scientists. That phrase, do your own research, it's popping up a lot in conversations about coronavirus and about
Speaker 3: If some jerk exposed my mother to COVID because they didn't wanna wear a mask, I would want to kill them.
Speaker 1: We can watch the experts, but we shouldn't be listening to Trump, a nonmedical professional. Well, the answer is listen to Bill Gates. Bill's the right around about a lot of things, and he's set the steep learning curve in global health. And we're really seeing just how important it is to to follow science. Yes.
Yes. Exactly. And we need to listen to scientists. The idea that people are questioning the science behind the vaccine
Speaker 5: The science checks out. Even if you
Speaker 3: don't believe in the science, you think you're tough enough and you're healthy enough and you're young enough, the scientists were right all along. Eventually, the science catches up with you. Are we doing more harm than good by questioning the science behind j and j?
Speaker 1: Trust that vaccine. Trust the experts. Mhmm. Listen to the medical experts. Trust the experts.
If you don't understand the science, you don't know what you're fighting. Just let the experts speak. So maybe you should just shut up right now. You don't wanna take advice from your golf buddy or from your aunt. You wanna listen to the scientists.
And we all stop saying, I need to do my own research.
Speaker 3: You see the ultimate effects of what happens when you don't listen to the scientists. This isn't about being scared.
Speaker 1: This is about scaring us straight.
Speaker 3: Science, science, and science. Only listen to the scientist.
Speaker 1: If we follow science,
Speaker 3: imagine, instead of staying locked up in the room, they're able to hug their grandchildren. This isn't about freedom. It's about freedom for your your neighbors.
Speaker 0: You can give each other hug as long as everyone is fully vaccinated.
Speaker 1: Sent to the scientists like the rest of us.
Speaker 3: We have to listen to the scientists.
Speaker 1: We'll listen to the scientists.
Speaker 3: Every scientist, every expert, listen to the experts.
Speaker 1: It's in listen to the science because the science works.
Speaker 4: Very much.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I think, trust science.
@mastarP001 - 🤐
@WallStreetApes This video was taken down on all platforms, but we keep putting it back up🔥 Please share this on every timeline 👇👇👇👇 https://t.co/2GbLl4CwRT
Video Transcript AI Summary
The focus should be on whether the people or a small group control the government, not which party is in power. The establishment has benefitted while citizens have suffered, but that will change starting now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people. For too long, a small group in our nation's capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost. The establishment protected itself, but not the citizens of our country. That all changes starting right here and right now.
@mastarP001 - 🤐
❗❗❗MUST WATCH ❗❗❗ YOU ALL NEED TO SEE THIS VIDEO 👇 This Replacement Migration And Single-Paty Rule explained in 2mins From @WesternLensman https://t.co/g0POBlwOTU
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video explains the Democrat plan to secure single-party rule in under 2 minutes: flood the country with millions of illegal immigrants, prioritize their needs over American citizens, protect them from consequences of crimes, attack critics as racist, create sanctuary cities for extra electoral power, change voting laws to favor Democrats, promise benefits for votes, and achieve single-party rule. Taxpayers fund this plan.
Translation: The video discusses the Democrat strategy to establish single-party control in less than 2 minutes: by bringing in many illegal immigrants, giving them priority over American citizens, protecting them from consequences, attacking critics as racist, creating sanctuary cities for extra electoral power, changing voting laws to benefit Democrats, promising benefits in exchange for votes, and ultimately achieving single-party control. Taxpayers are funding this plan.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The democrat open borders plan to entrench single party rule explained in under 2 minutes. 1, flood the country with untold millions of illegals by land, sea, and air from all over the world. Enough to eclipse the populations of 36 individual US states so far. 2, prioritize the needs of these millions of noncitizens over the needs of the American citizen with free flights, buses, hotels, meals, and phones, ensuring their loyalty to the political party that imported them. 3, keep them in the country at all costs even when they commit violent crime like murder and rape.
Attack the language used to describe the criminals as opposed to the criminals themselves. Slander critics as racist. 4, ensure their privileges are made irrevocable with city and state sanctuary apportionment in the house of representatives. As of now, that would equal 13 extra congressional districts, a tremendous amount of electoral power. 6, wage a massive heavily funded law fair campaign to change state voting laws that legalize mass mail in ballots.
No signature verification and no proof of citizenship requirements, making it nearly impossible to prove voter fraud. 7, lock in the permanent voting majority with campaign promises of lavish benefits and permanent privileges, enshrining generational fealty to the Democrat party. 8, win elections. 9, entrenched single party rule has been achieved. The best part?
Your tax dollars are paying for it.
@mastarP001 - 🤐
⚠️THIS WAS WHY ALEX JONES WAS DEPLATFORMED⚠️ Alex Jones warning the world as far as 2009. Must watch https://t.co/ZFZDI8kcnO
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a global agenda to enforce medical treatments, specifically vaccines, led by the Bilderberg group. They aim to establish a planetary dictatorship for their depopulation agenda. Vaccines are crucial because they are designed to slowly harm people over time. Doctor Rima, a medical doctor who understands the situation, is in Panama due to concerns about increasing police state developments. The governor arranges for her to meet him briefly at a small airfield in the Midwest. Doctor Rima explains that compulsory vaccinations will soon be implemented, leading to a genocidal holocaust and permanent sterility. She recounts a conversation with a head of state who referred to the planned population reduction as the "great culling" orchestrated by the aristocrats.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's an entire agenda afoot to force the population to undergo different type of medical treatments, namely vaccines. We're seeing a medical tyranny being set up, not just in the United States, but worldwide under the UN and the World Health Organization. Who's behind all this? The Bilderberg group. They want a planetary dictatorship so they can carry out their forced depopulation agenda, and they wanna do it through the medical system.
And that's why vaccines are so important. We know that many of these vaccines turn out to have serious adverse reactions, that this is being done by design. They kill you slowly over time. That's why they're called soft kill. And I've got an insider I think you should really talk to, doctor Rima but she doesn't live inside the United States because she's so concerned about all the police state developments that are taking place.
But if you can get her to come up here and talk to you. She's a medical doctor. She's treated heads of states, and she really understands what's happening on the inside. Where's on the inside. Where's the doctor now?
She's in Panama. Panama.
Speaker 1: So I gotta find her You
Speaker 0: can either go down to Panama and talk to her or somehow get her up here. She doesn't like to come up here, though. Here's her phone number and information in Panama.
Speaker 1: Alright. I'm gonna work on it. Take your time.
Speaker 2: Within days, arrangements are made. The renegade physician agrees to fly into a small airfield in the Midwest only if the governor will meet her there and only for a brief time.
Speaker 1: Doctor Lebo, how are you?
Speaker 3: I'm fine. Thank you, governor.
Speaker 1: Ventura, thanks for coming. You've left the United States of America.
Speaker 3: Yes, sir. I have.
Speaker 0: Why?
Speaker 3: I do not feel safe living in the United States. Do you wanna
Speaker 1: come in and sit down?
Speaker 3: No, sir. I'd rather not.
Speaker 1: You'd rather just be here so you can make a fast exit if you have As
Speaker 3: as you and I finish
Speaker 1: You're right.
Speaker 3: I'm leaving the country again. Why? Because in a very short time, not today, not tomorrow, but very soon, we'll be facing compulsory vaccination under the mistaken term of voluntary a
Speaker 1: What is it about these vaccinations? You think that they're bad?
Speaker 3: Well, first of all, let's start with the fact that the World health organization has decided that we have 90% too many people. The World Health Organization has been working Since 1974 on vaccines to create permanent sterility.
Speaker 1: Doctor, the response is gonna be, if you're crazy, the
Speaker 3: flu. A flu. Then the United States government, based on their statements that they've already made, will say, oh my. We have a pandemic. What that means is a holocaust, a genocidal holocaust.
Men and women will thicken and die, and those who survive will be infertile. Let me tell you a story. In 2003, I had a patient in my drug free medical practice who was a head of state. And one day, she said, you know, it's almost time For the great culling to begin.
Speaker 1: The what?
Speaker 3: That's what I said. The what? She said the great culling, c u l l I n g, cold. And she said, those are the to be called. And she said, those are the people who are consuming our Nonrenewable natural resources.
I said, who are the people who make this decision? She said, we, the Aristocrats.
Speaker 1: This person you talk to, you're bound because you're a physician and Correct. There's the relationship that can't talk. Is this person a member of the Bilderbergs?
Speaker 3: She is not queen Beatrice. She is not the queen of England. She is not Henry Kissinger. But she Certainly presented herself as a member of that power elite, and she certainly was a head of state.