reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @cosmicape888
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
My response to the Washington Post. This is a 40-minute lecture, Part 1 in what I'd like to be an ongoing series, Censorship Industry Decoded. This first video cut through the tricks & traps in WaPo's verbage. These tricks are stock for the industry & essential to understand.
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video discusses a government scandal involving the censorship of social media posts during the 2020 and 2022 elections. The speaker highlights the deceptive tactics used by the Washington Post to downplay the scandal. The so-called "academics" involved in the censorship were actually government cutouts, funded by and working closely with the government. They actively flagged and pressured tech platforms to remove posts, using the threat of regulatory action and crisis PR. They also pushed for a terms of service policy called "delegitimization" that banned discussions about election integrity. The speaker exposes the collusion between these academics and the tech platforms, as well as the revolving door between government and academia. The censorship efforts targeted millions of posts and narratives, effectively silencing dissenting voices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, I'm going to break down one of the biggest government scandals in the entire history of the 21st century through the lens of breaking down the deceptive framing devices used by the Washington Post this week to try to stop the scandal's public exposure. What I've done here is I've highlighted this whole article and every one of these highlights is going to elucidate a deeper aspect of the scandal. This is intended to be a deep dive analysis for those who are totally new here and you just want to primer on the whole thing, which is essentially the story of how hundreds of millions of social media posts across Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Reddit, every single platform on the American Internet was censored ahead of the 2020 elections, during the 2022 midterm elections the private sector, civil society and news media and fact checking orgs fused into the cell of a single atom essentially to form what was called or whole of society response to censoring the internet.
Speaker 1: Addressing disinformation requires a whole of society approach. We often talk about a whole of society response.
Speaker 2: From a systems standpoint, and and we hear this term all the time, A problem like disinformation, fighting disinformation, really requires a whole of society response. And I know whole of society is a little bit cliche and and a term that It's thrown around a
Speaker 1: lot. I think the solution has to be whole of society, which is the word that we throw around a lot, especially in venues like these. Right? We need cooperation from the tech platforms. But we also need people in the government who are willing to say yes, this is a problem and it's not just about foreign actors.
Speaker 0: This is going to be a pretty advanced talk aimed to educate policymakers and investigators who have a certain baseline background in this. If you're new and you want the world's best primer on it, Simply go to this primer on Foundation For Freedom online. It breaks down the entire thing, the networks, the funding, the scale and scope of the censorship that was done, who all was involved, why they did it, their confession videos essentially on tape. You will walk away on this with a PhD in the scandal. But I'm going to use this lecture for a deep dive.
But again, if you want it linearly, simply go right here. So The Washington Post reached out to me this week telling me that they were going to be running this piece, and I had a conversation with Gabe Kaminski from the Washington Examiner about my expectations. I told Gabe ahead of time that the piece would be indistinguishable from a ChattGBT auto aggregation negation of all the press releases of the Federal Government and EIP simply taking their word for what they say without any interrogation of the mountains of underlying evidence, confession videos, source documents. I told Gabe that the the article is going to deflect by using words like researcher and study instead of using the word censorship or flagging. It's going to try to characterize them as nebbish professors rather than as government partnered operatives, And it is probably going to even include and I said this directly and you can ask Gabe.
I said it's probably also going to have a picture of one of the stars of the story, like Alex Stamos or Renee Di Resta or Kate Starbird. And it's going to have soft lighting, and it's going to be middle distance and the person is going to be looking slightly away from the camera, in a kind of, angelic, mysterious hue to really drive home the, the mystery. I said they'll probably even send out a photo team to do it And as you can see, it turns out they actually used a picture from March for this, but it's It feels like that scene from 8 Mile where, you know, M and M sort of says what The, you know, the other guy is gonna rap about before it comes out. I called each and every aspect of this And you're going to find out now why this was so predictable and how and, and what a mistake they made by, by bringing this to me. So let's now tell this story through the lens of cutting through the deceptive framing devices that The Washington Post uses here.
We'll start with the title. These academics studied falsehood spread by Trump. Now the GOP wants answers. Let's start with the word academics. This is the word used to mislead you.
These are not academics. These are government cutouts. I'm going to say that again. These are not academics, certainly not in any classical sense that matches any definition that you probably associate with an academic. These are government cutouts.
They are self aware that they are government cutouts. The government itself is self aware that the universities are government cutouts. In fact, the head of EIP, the Election Integrity Partnership, The head of the 120 person censorship consortium partnered with the Department of Homeland Security even described his university department and EIP writ large as a government cutout.
Speaker 3: There was a lack of capability around election disinformation. This is not because CISA didn't care about disinformation, but at the time, they lacked, both kind of the funding and the legal authorizations, to go do the kinds of work that would be necessary to truly understand how election disinformation was operating. So because of the feedback, and the ideas from these, this group, we were able to pull together pretty quickly a project between these 4 different institutions to try to fill the gap of the things that the government cannot do themselves. Just, lacked the legal authorizations. So we were able to pull together a project to try to fill the gap of the things that the government cannot do themselves.
Speaker 0: So understand what he just said right there. This is Alex Stamos, the head of Stanford University's censorship lab, the Stanford Internet Observatory, The head of the entire EIP consortium with Stanford, UW, Graphica and the Atlantic Council saying that CISA, the censorship sub agency within DHS, wanted to do this counter misinformation work, which as you will see, is just straight up censorship work. That's it. It's not research. It's mass flagging and programming the algorithms to tune you out of existence.
And he is saying the federal government, CISA, Wanted to do this, expressed an interest in doing this, but they knew that it was illegal. They lacked the legal authorizations. And so EIP was set up to fill the gaps of what the government could not do itself. This is what is called a government cutout. When the government wants to do something but doesn't want to be seen doing it, It launders or outsources to a non governmental private sector or for a civil society institution working closely behind the scenes with the government so that technically, Even though it's government sourced and government sought, the fingerprints are on an entity at the plausible deniable level at a nongovernmental way.
This is stuff the CIA does. When the state department wants to carry out a deniable operation, doesn't want the US government's fingerprints on something, the CIA will carry it out and it will work through a series of cutout organizations that don't look like their government. They will work with private firms and they will work with universities to launder the operation to remove the fingerprints. But here you have the head of EIP giving up the game saying they only set it up because the government told them they couldn't do it. They were expressly set up as a cutout.
The whole premise of using a word like academic is to present the academics as if they are independent, totally independent from the government, removed, making up their own minds, a firewall between them and the government. And yet, not only were they partnered and as we will see, using government funded domestic disinformation switchboards to mass flag your posts, They were a birth child of the federal government. They asked the government for permission to exist. This is page 21 of EIP's and the company's 2 92 page tell all report in which they bragged about everything they did and got rewarded by the Biden administration integration with a joint $3,000,000 government grant to do more censorship for the 2022 midterms and the 2024 election. They also sell this, this censorship structuring instruction manual to other universities.
What you see on page 21 here is EIP's operational timeline, their self described operational timeline. You'll see on June 9, 2020, this 4 months before the election, before election day of the the last presidential election, EIP had a meeting with CISA to present EIP concept. So this is EIP, Alex Stamos, meeting with the government to present to the government their proposed solution for filling the gaps of what the government wanted to censor but could not do itself. You can't get more government cut out than that. Actually, you can.
These are screenshots, citations in the FFO report showing that Every single entity in the Election Integrity Partnership, all 4 of them, Stanford UW, Graphica, and the Atlantic Council, all are funded by the federal government. Graphica gets got about $7,000,000 in Pentagon grants. The Atlantic Council gets funds from the Department of State, Department of Defense, Department of Energy, the National Endowment For Democracy, USAID, and Stanford in UW just months after the 2020 election that they censored and a 100% of their targets were the opposition to the Biden administration, the Biden administration magically gave them $3,000,000 of your taxpayer funding to upscale them for censoring the 2022 midterms in 2024. That's a 5 year grant, $3,000,000 for Alex Stamos and the rest and Kate Starboard groups. They asked for permission to exist.
They, quote, presented the concept to CISA. The government told them that the government couldn't do it, so they need to exist to fill the government's gaps. They're all funded by the government, but wait, there's more. They're also a complete revolving door with government. Here, you'll see that the head of CISA, Chris Krebs, in 2020.
Right after he left government, the first thing he did was he started a Two man consultancy firm with the head of the IP, Alex Stamos the head of the government side of the censorship and the head of the private sector side of the censorship literally went into business together the moment the government guy got kicked out of government. So the head of CISA gets in bed with Stanford University's Alex Stamos. How about the top deputy at CISA, Matt Masterson? What did he do when he left government? Well, he also went to Alex Stamos' Stanford University, Stanford Air rhetoric as the fellow right after leaving government.
The top 2 guys rotated directly into the exact cutout that they had set up while in government. Alex Stamos and it runs in reverse. It's not just the government with a revolving door to the universities. From the university side, Alex Stamos spent 2021 and 2022 directly on CISA's Cyber Hygiene Advisor Subcommittee. Rene de Ressa gives lectures as we will see at CISA disinformation summits.
Kate Starbird, who is the head of EIP's University of Washington unit, headed the mis and disinformation subcommittee at CISA. So they're currently concurrently occupying these government advisory posts, in addition to being funded by the government, coordinating with the government, being born out of the government and rotating, back and forth totally interstitial. And in fact, the whole society model is for them to be in lockstep. So understand when you see this word academic, academic, academic, They are saying this to throw you off. They are saying this so that you don't see the word government and so you don't see the word political operative.
Through the academic institutions, they are raising a censorship mercenary army. As FFO has documented, $40,000,000 have flowed from the Biden administration straight to 40 different universities they
Speaker 2: have raised as a censorship mercenary
Speaker 0: army to do the same thing that or ship mercenary army to do the same thing that Alex Stamos and Stanford and Kate Starbird and UW did in 2020. They wanted to control every sensitive policy issue and were only stopped because of political pushback in late 2022. Alex Stamos is not an academic. Alex Stamos got a bachelor's degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. No PhD.
No Teaching History. Didn't come up through the system like an academic. He runs what's known as a center where he spearheads the university staff that does the censorship work. He is a political operative and that center is simply used as a perch, a non governmental perch for government coordinated operations that the government itself couldn't get caught doing because it would be illegal if the government did it. So they launder it to Alex Stamos' university center where the operative coordinating with the government can fill the gaps of what the government can't do itself.
Now let's look at the next deceptive framing trick. The word studied. Now, this is a big one. Just as the word academics is used, So you don't see the word government cut out. The word studied is used, so you don't see the word censored.
Now understand what they're trying to do here. They are trying to both indirectly suggest, in the sense directly say that they did not directly involve themselves in censorship. They simply studied misinformation. We didn't actually drop the bombs out of the plane they did both they were in a sense not just the research scientists of the atom bomb They were the battle planners of the war, and they personally drove the planes to drop them over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, so to speak. And I'm going to show you how they did this.
So we're going to start with a little game where I will play evidence and you will ask yourself, Is this EIP studying something or EIP censoring something? Is this EIP passively research something or is this EIP actively flagging, actively pressuring, actively coercing, actively demanding, actively jawboning the tech companies to tear down information and what information to tear down, when, what, why, who, all the way down to graphs of highly specific individuals and tens of millions of posts in the aggregate. This interview is dated August 26, 2020. EIP's first day of activity was the very next week, September 3rd, right after this interview. And you will hear Alex Stamos describe how he lined up the tech companies in order to get them to take stuff down, not to assist in the research to take stuff down.
Speaker 3: So we have we have reached out and we have had two way conversations with all the major platforms. Right? So we've had really good conversations with Facebook, Twitter, Google, Reddit. We've talked to TikTok. That's actually been very productive.
Some of the smaller groups, Discord. You know, there's there's a bunch of companies Didn't really exist or they were much smaller in 2016. They're now are real players. So that's been good. I think, you know, Our goal with that is that if we're able to find disinformation that we will be able to report it quickly and then collaborate with them on taking it down.
And there's a good precedent for this, which All 4 of these organizations have worked on research projects side by side with tech platforms.
Speaker 0: Oh, so they're using their research relationship to then I'm sorry. What was that? What did you say that? Say that again.
Speaker 3: Thinking that we'll be able to report it quickly. If they're able to find disinformation, that we'll be able to report it quickly And then collaborate with them on taking it down. And there's a
Speaker 0: Taking it down. So, again, look at our operational timeline. EIP Alex Stamos had a meeting with the government, the federal government CISA to present the concept of a outside censorship consortium. They're saying it was to study misinformation, information. But the study was only the 1st step.
After the studying came the taking it down part. And in fact, he actively colluded with every single tech platform ahead of time. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, TikTok, Reddit, even the small ones to line them up so that Alex Stamos and his 120 staffers could report it quickly and take it down the moment EIP went live with the federal or government, which was September 3, 2020, the very week after that interview. So in that intervening period between when he cooked up the idea with the federal government. And when the censorship consortium went live is when he was lining up all of the tech platforms so that they would be in a position to quickly censor the information Stamos flagged.
Now I'm focusing on Alex Stamos here because he is the Head of EIP, he's also the Head of Stanford University and he's also the one who was had the closest relationship, the 2 man consultancy, just him and the head of the very federal government agency they partnered with for censorship. But Alex Stamos had a 120 people, a huge teams, gigantic teams is how they describe
Speaker 3: You're seeing, 5 of us right now, but you know, again, there's like a 120 people who worked on this. I want to make sure all the people in the audience understand that there's huge teams behind each of us.
Speaker 1: Gigantic team.
Speaker 0: Gigantic. Here in EIP's report on page 200 and all throughout the report is their description of nearly 5,000 individual posts, again, First Amendment protected posts about your opinions about elections that EIP manually flagged, manually submitted in their tickets to the tech platforms to take stuff down. And you can see examples of the URLs, the 1st Amendment protected, totally benign, banal, always protected by Americans to be able to talk to each other about is the issue that they flagged in their own tickets for Sharpiegate. Here you see on the screen the censorship collusion screenshots included in their own report where EIP submits a ticket to the tech platforms, all of them, TikTok, Facebook, Google, Twitter as well as EIISAC, which I'll describe later. Where Sharpiegate, they say, is trending on Twitter.
They show the sample the the, a slew of URLs to take down or to action under remove, reduce, and form, which is just censoring by banning it, censoring it by adding friction so it's de amplified or censoring it through a fact check label. It's all censorship. It's all intended to deamplify, to take the stuff down or to or to stop it from going viral. And EIP member says, hello, platform partners. We've added you on several different cases of claims which are going viral right now.
So they are actively organizing every tech platform on earth in the United States so that they can all collectively take down viral claims being made by U. S. Citizens protected by the First Amendment. And on top of that, They rallied them to do a counter narrative. This is as active censorship and as active political engineering as you could possibly get.
And not only that, they had the audacity to redact the government partners. These are government communications. These are communications with government officials. All of this is a violation of the National Records Act. Why aren't these tickets discoverable through FOIA?
Why is Stanford holding them rather than the the government partners? There should never be a government partner with name redacted unless something's classified. And And as you'll see, there's a damn good reason why they're trying to not disclose these tickets because it's where the bodies are buried in the censorship industry, but we'll get to that. Now we get to the dig whopper. We've already established it's not studying.
It was active flagging for takedown. It was active collusion with the federal government and the tech platforms themselves for takedown. It was a government cutout doing the taking down. But how do you get to the scale of hundreds of millions of social media posts? This was introduced through a incredibly devious trick called Deligitimization was the brainchild of EIP to coerce the tech platforms, exploiting their fears of being punished by Washington allies of EIP, exploiting their fear of huge regulatory pressure and crisis PR communications from bad press to get them to add a terms of service violation policy called de legitimization that banned all questions about the legitimacy of election processes, outcomes or election integrity issues, including and especially mail in ballots.
Tens of millions of social media posts about mail in ballots alone were all banned in the United States of America because a government cut out, a monstrosity born out of the Department of Homeland Security and EIP brag that they were responsible for the tech companies adopting this vast terms of service policy change that instantaneously made tens of millions of posts a banable offense, a banable speech police infraction.
Speaker 4: I think the IP really helped push the envelope with things like, to just the notion that this pre this de legitimization of electoral processes that we were seeing in the summer and Early fall that this should be against content moderation policies on these platforms.
Speaker 0: So you just heard him say that it was key who got the tech companies to push the envelope to adopt de legitimization as a terms of service policy, delegitimization of mail in ballots, delegitimization of early voting drop boxes, articulating any of the legal challenges in the courts, agreeing with one of the candidates in the race, in the election. And it was EIP who got them to take the proactive steps to enforce the policy that they jawboned them as we will see to adopt.
Speaker 4: And they began to take proactive steps there. We did Get industry partners to push the envelope a little bit in the US context. But how can a similar kind of pressure and responsiveness, be elicited from platforms when it's not, a U. S. Election with huge regulatory stakes for these companies.
Speaker 0: We did get industry partners, meaning the tech platforms, Facebook, Twitter, Google, YouTube, TikTok, Snapchat, Reddit to adopt This terms of service policy change, this censorship policy, this speech restriction policy, things you cannot talk about in America online anymore. And he and what he says is we got them to do it because there were, quote, huge regulatory stakes for them if they didn't. And they're worried that they won't have the same influence over the tech platforms when they can't command that kind of pressure on the companies on the regulatory side, meaning congressional allies like Senator Mark Warner or Amy Klobuchar or Elizabeth Warren, who are all threatening to break up the tech companies if action wasn't taken or to regulate them through the FTC out of profitability. And now you're going to hear Alex Stamos articulate the 2 step plan by by which you get tens of millions of social media posts removed reduced or informed across all of these platforms. Here is the same most two step.
Speaker 3: My suggestion is if people want to get the the platforms to do stuff, is first you gotta push for And so this is something we started in the summer in August is, as Kate talked about, Carly Miller led a team from from all 4 institutions To look at the detailed policies of the big platforms and to measure them against situations that we expected to happen. Now we're not gonna take credit for all the changes they made, But there we had to update this thing like 8 or 9 times. Right? And so, like, putting these people in a grid to say, you're not handling this, you're not handling this, not handling this, Creates a lot of pressure inside the companies and forces them to kind of grapple with these issues because you want specific policies that you can hold them accountable for. The second is when you report stuff to them, report how it's violating those written policies.
Right? So there's 2 steps here. Get good policies and then say, this is how it's violating it. We will have our statistics. Right?
But I think we were pretty effective in getting them to act on things that they hadn't act on it before.
Speaker 0: They were effective at getting the tech platforms to censor content that they didn't censor before, and they did it through 2 steps. They used the threat of regulatory action by the government combined with crisis PR to generate pressure for the companies if they were shown censorship policies adopted by their peers and made to look like they were a platform for misinformation, which in their words created huge pressure inside the companies. And you'll notice how Stamos very carefully tries to hedge by talking about things and stuff rather than saying the word censor.
Speaker 3: We're not gonna take credit for all the changes they made.
Speaker 0: He's saying we're not gonna take credit for all of them because He knows that they have to have some semblance of independence, but he's taking credit for some of them. This is the government. This is the government's handpicked partner and hand selected cutout also funded by the government. Also doing this and censorship through government funded technology through the domestic disinformation switchboard.
Speaker 3: But there we had to update this thing like 8 or 9 times.
Speaker 0: What he's referring to is the grid they created for for all of the platform policies of every single tech platform and then pressuring every single one of them to say, Facebook is censoring mail in ballots. Why aren't you? Why aren't you? You know, there's gonna be Bad PR for you if you, Twitter, are not in line with best practices on stopping misinformation. And Then the hit pieces come as they did and 1 by 1, all of them folded.
And they articulate this as being the effective plan. And these people had the chutzpah to call all of that studying. By EIP's own math, this is page two zero one of their own report. EIP classified 22,000,000 tweets. In just the 2020 election cycle alone as being misinformation terms of service violations, I e, censorable under the very terms of service policy they jawboned the companies to adopt when they didn't want to adopt them and wouldn't have done otherwise.
And they bragged about this on tape. Now when Foundation For Freedom Online broke this 22,000,000 tweet figure. EIP responded in a panic trying to argue that these 22,000,000 tweets they identified as misinformation, they identified them After the election, don't you know? So it's 22,000,000. Yeah.
But that's not what we flagged. That was what we assessed after the election. This is extremely devious on their part. An outrageous limited hangout they're trying to pull here. Those 22,000,000 tweets were made before the election or before all the processes to challenge election and results that were still being processed in the courts.
That is, all these tweets were made between the summer of 2020 and December of 2020. So they were all during the election cycle, these 22,000,000. And wouldn't you know, the very 1st day that EIP formerly began operations. Remember, they started all the way back in June. They were doing concept presentation meetings to CISA then.
But the very 1st day they formally set up shop was the very day that Facebook changed its terms of service to ban de legitimization, meaning anybody who de legitimizes the validity of mail in ballots, early voting drop boxes or any of the voting procedures that were still being litigated in the in the state assemblies, Anyone who de legitimize them, that's tens of millions of Americans no longer able to talk about mail in ballots because a government cut out, a government partnered censorship consortium expressly set up because the government wasn't allowed to do it itself, jaw boned Facebook to adopt that policy. In the very following week, September 10th, Twitter did as well. So those 22,000,000 tweets that were terms of service violations as misinformation, meaning censored under the delegitimization policy. That delegitimization policy was only put in place in Twitter because of EIP and it was done so on September 10th, which meant those 22,000,000 tweets were all bannable only because EIP stepped in to Jawbone them for the entire election cycle. So that's 22,000,000 tweets that EIP targeted for takedown.
Case closed. And then remember, You have to add in all of these platforms. That's 22,000,000 just on Twitter alone. Facebook, Pinterest also September 3rd, 1st day of EIP operations. Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Nextdoor, everyone folded to EIP and the powerful network of congressional allies and major national security figures behind them.
And that's why you couldn't talk about the last election. And as we'll see, it's also why you couldn't talk about the many aspects of the COVID nineteen pandemic. Now another trick that EIP used was to distinguish between incidents and narratives, misinformation incidents, meaning individual posts and misinformation narratives, which can comprise millions of posts. You'll see here these misinformation narratives that they identify everything from the Dominion Voting Machines to the entire Stop the Steal concept or movement, Sharpie gate, narratives around poll watcher issues, the postal service, dead voter rolls, Antifa and the Sunrise Zoom calls. And you'll see here, EIP attaches in their own internal documents the approximate number of tweets related to the misinformation narratives that is the banned narratives.
Some of these have millions or hundreds of thousands, 7,000,000, in 3,000,000, 800,000, 600,000. These are all automatically down ranked under remove, reduce, and form, and they were tickets for all of these and they're refusing to turn them over. These are tickets that combine the federal government, EIP in every single tech platform on earth or at least in America, all plotting to ban You from talking about dozens of narratives and 66 discrete narratives for COVID, they, according to their own document. When they lie straight to your face and tell you they only censored things having to do with time, place and manner of voting.
Speaker 1: We had narrowly tailored scope focused on false and misleading narratives specific to voting.
Speaker 0: Ask them what the Sunrise Zoom calls, the Antifa phone calls are doing on this censored list with hundreds of thousands of misinformation tag posts there or how they censored the color revolution concerns articulated by Darren Beatty's revolver, which is also referenced as a misinformation narrative in EIP's report. You see, one trick that EIT plays is when they deem something to be a misinformation narrative, they no longer need to argue that each individual post, each individual tweet is a terms of service violation. If the misinformation narrative is declared banned, then it doesn't matter whether you are right or wrong. If it's malinformation, even if you're right, you are still advancing a narrative that is deemed wrong. It is the great catchall they used to ban, as we'll see, 66 discrete narratives covering everything from vaccines to masks to the efficacy of lockdown policies for the COVID nineteen pandemic.
This is building to be the blueprint for every sensitive policy issue in our democracy. But I'm not weighing in on the substance of any of these narratives. I don't know whether any of these are right or wrong. I don't make a substantive point on these. It's about freedom of speech and freedom on the Internet.
Never before in American history has, have people been banned from being able to talk about and ongoing election especially when that with that banning coming straight from the Department of Homeland Security through a deliberately constructed cut out to disguise the U. S. Government's leadership role. Now we've only covered the tip of the iceberg here, But for brevity sake, I'll pause the lecture here and we'll continue with another round tomorrow.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe 9/11 was an inside job, orchestrated by a collaboration between the CIA and MOSSAD. Larry Silverstein, a Jewish Israeli citizen, profited significantly from the attacks, and there are numerous connections between Israeli officials and the events surrounding that day. I question why Israel receives substantial U.S. tax dollars while engaging in actions against Palestinians. I also find the official narrative of 9/11 scientifically flawed and suspect that the government covered up the involvement of various parties, including the CIA and Saudi operatives.
@cosmicape888 - Optimus
Remember 9/11 was an inside job.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The official 9/11 story involves 19 hijackers, led by Mohammed Atta, outwitting America's defense systems despite the US military defense drill code named Vigilant Guardian that simulated the exact events of nine eleven.. Three buildings fell in New York, including the Twin Towers and Building 7, with the latter collapsing in a manner resembling controlled demolition. The investigation was underfunded, and the official story is riddled with inconsistencies, including recovered hijacker passports and the failure to identify plane wreckage.
Osama bin Laden denied involvement, and the Taliban offered extradition under due process. Evidence suggests a conspiracy beyond the official narrative, involving traitors within the US government, dual nationals, and Jewish Israelis motivated by a "new Pearl Harbor" event to justify perpetual war.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The official version of nine eleven. Here's a brief description of the official version. 19 hijackers, mostly of Saudi origin, were headed by a lead hijacker named Mohammed Atta. The hijackers received flight school training for small, single and twin engine airplanes at various flight schools in The United States. These hijackers were directed by Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, who lived in caves in Afghanistan while requiring dialysis to survive.
Together, they managed to outwit the entire defense systems of America despite the fact that 02/2001, the United States invested more money and resources in defense than just about every other nation on the planet combined. We were told that the breathtakingly vast defense and intelligence apparatus of America had not contemplated the possibility of airplanes being used to fly into buildings. On 09/11, there was a US military defense drill code named Vigilant Guardian that simulated the exact events of nine eleven. As a result of this drill, there was confusion about whether there was a real or simulated hijacking, and thus, 19 individuals managed to allegedly hijack four planes and freely roam American airspace without any challenge from US interceptor fighter jets. The official version tells us the hijacker successfully hit three out of four targets on nine eleven.
With one airplane being brought down by heroic passengers who shouted, let's roll, before overwhelming the box cutter armed Muslim fanatic terrorists. The other planes, however, hit the Twin Towers and allegedly the Pentagon in Washington DC as well, which happens to be the most heavily guarded airspace on planet Earth. While none of the virtually indestructible black boxes of any of the four airplanes were ever proven to be recovered, including that of flight 93, which apparently managed an intact nosedive into a field in Pennsylvania, which occurred at such a high rate of speed that none of the actual plane, fuselage, jet engine, seats, or bodies was ever recovered. However, officials did recover two of the hijackers passports and a bandana, as well as another alleged hijacker's passport from flight 11, which slammed into the North Tower, causing a massive fireball. Although just two of the buildings were hit by planes in New York City, Three buildings were completely destroyed, while seven buildings were either partially or fully destroyed.
The Twin Towers almost entirely turned to dust, while Building 7 collapsed in a process that resembled a controlled demolition, with each of the three buildings falling at free fall speed. We are told that the destruction of the Twin Towers was caused by the weakening of the steel support columns from jet fuel fires and that Building 7 collapsed uniformly in a free fall due to a standard office fire. This is the first and only time in history that has occurred to such buildings, steel support, steel frame buildings. We are also told that the Pentagon was hit by an airplane whose pilot executed a 270 degree banking right turn as it descended 8,000 feet, all the while managing to avoid detection of upwards to 85 surveillance cameras covering its flight path as it apparently flew directly into the Pentagon. Footage from the 85 plus surveillance cameras was confiscated by the FBI, but they assure us it was just as described.
The commission created to carry out the official investigation required four hundred and forty two days to be formed by a foot dragging Bush administration. No less than Henry Kissinger was appointed to lead the investigation, and the total budget allocated to investigate the biggest crime in the history of America was a staggeringly minuscule $14,000,000. By comparison, the US government budgeted a hundred and $60,000,000 when adjusted for inflation to investigate the space shuttle Challenger disaster in 1986. The official version of nine eleven is a terribly bad b movie. It is a massive insult to our intelligence and all too significantly reveals the depth of mind control that many in our world are subject to.
All too ironically, those of us who are not so brain dead as to believe the official version are called conspiracy theorists. Despite the obvious fact that the official version of nine eleven is in fact, you guessed it, a conspiracy. It just so happens to be the most ridiculous conspiracy of them all. And let us not forget these important facts. Osama bin Laden himself denied any involvement in nine eleven.
And before you have that knee jerk reaction of saying he confessed to it on video, hold that thought. With regard to America's supposed need to invade Afghanistan in pursuit of bin Laden, the Taliban stated on record that they would extradite him if only The United States would adhere to this paltry little thing called due process of law, which also involves another little thing called evidence. As it turns out, The US decided in favor of invading and occupying two nations and turning them back to the stone age. As far as the evidence is concerned, it's a sort of don't worry about it kind of thing. So Bin Laden was never actually charged with any crime regarding nine eleven, with the FBI stating in 02/2006 that there was, quote, no hard evidence linking Bin Laden to nine eleven.
Going back to the supposed Bin Laden video confession, if the FBI does not believe it, why do you? As for the supposed 19 hijackers, there is no video evidence of any of the hijackers boarding the planes. From airports controlled by Israeli security, no less. Several items have been used as evidence to implicate these patsies, but these are ridiculous. As already mentioned, three passports belonging to alleged hijackers were supposedly recovered.
In the case of Sattam Al Sakami's passport, it is said to have survived the plane crash's explosive fireball in the North Tower, falling hundreds of feet to the ground, and then randomly picked up by a passerby who delivered it to the New York Police Department. In pristine condition, no less, with no burns, tears, or rips, with the picture and name perfectly visible. Once again, no bodies or plane wreckage was recovered from the alleged flight 93 crash site in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, supposedly because the plane crashed at such an incredible rate of speed that that apparently everything vaporized. Nonetheless, two passports, a martyrdom note and a red bandana that is said to have been worn by one of the hijackers was remarkably recovered. So now let us extract ourselves from the collective insanity required to even entertain the official version of nine eleven.
Instead, let us take a look at reality and the evidence around nine eleven that is part of the public record. As you will see, this evidence indicts certain players who were indeed motivated by a religious fanaticism, but they are not Muslims. First off, let us acknowledge the obvious. The US government has done everything in its power to pervert the course of justice, and that in itself is a major crime given the mass murder they continue to cover up. So this fact alone indicts the US government.
Aside from that, the odds of a drill simulating the exact events of the actual reality occurring as pure coincidence is like a fairy story. With no disrespect to those who believe in fairies because I myself accept the existence of fairies as a far more likely possibility than the myriad of coincidences that officially occurred regarding nine eleven. Speaking of coincidences, imagine that you are a Jewish billionaire businessman named Larry Silverstein, and that you have set your sights on acquiring some of the most expensive real estate in the world, specifically the World Trade Center complex with its crown jewels known as the Twin Towers. However, there's a bit of a problem. The Twin Towers were full of cancer causing asbestos, and the cost estimates for removal of the asbestos ranged from the low billions to the tens of billions, far, far more than the outdated half empty Twin Towers were worth.
Indeed, the Twin Towers were such a liability that the Port Authority of New York had been desperately seeking a way to demolish them since 1990. But the cost of doing so prevented them from doing this because the toxic asbestos was extremely difficult and dangerous to remove. On 05/14/2001, '4 months before 09:11, the Port Authority lost a lawsuit that meant it was on the hook to remove that asbestos. The head of the Port Authority was Louis Eisenberg, and he personally oversaw the privatization that led to Larry Silverstein and Frank Loewy obtaining the ninety nine year lease for the towers on 07/24/2001, just six weeks before 09:11. But Silverstein demanded and got $3,500,000,000 worth of insurance payable in cash if the towers were destroyed.
Now the fact that Silverstein was close friends with Benjamin Netanyahu or that he skipped his daily breakfast at the Windows on the World restaurant located on the Hundred And Seventh Floor of the North Tower on 09:11, or that his son and daughter also happened to be unexpectedly absent on 09:11, is all just amazing good fortune, we are told.
Speaker 1: The in the days before, I think, the World Trade Center, the Twin Towers, fell. I understand you had daily breakfast meetings with people, I think, in the, in the windows of the world, the famous restaurant. That's correct. But you weren't there for breakfast on the day of September 11. Why was that?
Speaker 2: That morning, my wife had made an appointment for me as the dermatologist who I have to visit with regularity. Right? And and as I'm dressing to go to the dermatologist that morning, I looked at my wife and said, you know, I've got so much to do downtown. Cancel the dermatologist. I've gotta go downtown.
She got upset. She said, you can't you can't cancel. You've got to go.
Speaker 1: Was that, Larry Silverstein's luck?
Speaker 2: It was that clearly my luck. It was that clearly my luck.
Speaker 0: Larry's business partner is quite a character himself. Jewish billionaire Frank Loewy, who leased the shopping concourse area called the mall at the World Trade Center, made up of approximately 427,000 square feet of retail floor space, Loi is a Hungarian Jew born in Czechoslovakia with Israeli citizenship. In 1946, he made his way to Palestine, then under the British mandate, where he joined the Jewish terrorist group known as Haganath. From there, he joined the notorious Golani Brigade and partook in the ethnic cleansing of Al Jalil. Loewy is personal friends with the entire Lykud leadership, Netanyahu, Sharon, etcetera.
He lives in Israel part of the year and has established numerous think tanks to promote Israeli geopolitical interests. So Silverstein's and Loewy's investment would have to be considered one of the worst investments in the history of our world were it not for the little coincidence of two planes bringing down seven buildings within six weeks of leasing the property and then taking out a multibillion dollar insurance policy, which resulted in Silverstein and Lloyd receiving an insurance payoff of over $5,000,000,000 Not bad at all. When Silverstein was asked why he purchased the Twin Towers lease, he simply said, quote, I felt a compelling urge to own them. Let us imagine that Lucky Larry was instead named Mohammed, and he was a Muslim instead of a Jew. And Mohammed bought this dubious asbestos ridden property, proceeded to more than double the insurance policy.
Then as the world watches while his buildings disintegrate six weeks later, Mohammed even directs that one building be, quote, pulled. And subsequently, good old Mohammed gets a tidy $5,000,000,000 profit.
Speaker 3: This one's for Larry Silverstein. Last time we talked, sir, I asked you if you could address some of the nine eleven conspiracy theories that you were accused of. Sadly, your response has actually invited more of them. I mean, for the record, everybody knows your infamous comments on PBS where you said Pool Building 7, on 05/25 on the day of nine eleven.
Speaker 4: They they
Speaker 2: were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire. I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe this is one of the things to do is is pull it. And they made that decision to pull, and then we watched the building collapse.
Speaker 3: Your official response was that it was the firefighters. My question is, it was pretty clear that you met the building. And if it was the firefighters, fighters, they already are outside the building by twelve because the water lines were broken. Ask the question. And the the fire chief that you said you spoke to, fire chief Nagro, denies talking to you on that day of 09:11.
Can you answer those questions and address the theories against you?
Speaker 5: I
Speaker 6: suggest everybody's consideration Just one question. That we all look at the thousands of pages of testimony that are rendered in many years since nine eleven. And let's use today's session for some
Speaker 3: Are you aware of testimony of bombs in the building before the building collapsed, sir? Are you aware of that testimony?
Speaker 5: Let's go.
Speaker 3: Sir, there's testimony by Baragena. You sir, you don't have to touch me. Listen. I'll I'll walk away. All I'm asking is a question.
I don't have to be kicked out. I know, but there's other people It's a legitimate question. You don't have to put your hands on me, but all I'm saying is make a seat. No. I'm not.
I'm here asking the question was not answered. That's why I have agreeance. Larry Silverstein was told not to come into work. That's why him, his daughter, and his son never showed up to work on nineeleven. He he put an insurance policy on the buildings.
Reporters, do your job. Please ask some questions.
Speaker 0: It is like a tragic comedy that we as people have allowed ourselves to be conned into ignoring the mountains of evidence that indicts traitors within the US government and military, as well as dual nationals, Jewish Israelis, who happen to have also advertised their desire for a, quote, new Pearl Harbor type event that would allow them to carry out a perpetual war policy for reasons of greed and power, wrapped up in a blanket of patriotism, of course. Whether you knew any of this or not, it has been hidden in plain sight. Folks, we have only just begun to reveal the fingerprints of this crime scene. But the next question is, are we ready to face the truth? Well, I believe we are.
So let us imagine a crime so audacious that it was practically advertised before it was even committed. In addition to the incredible act of false flag terrorism that is the nine eleven operation, I am talking about the supreme crime of aggression defined by the International Criminal Court as the planning, preparation, initiation, or execution of an act using armed force by a state against the sovereignty, territorial integrity, or political independence of another state. Well, that is precisely what these criminals in positions of public trust did. First, they planned. Then they boldly laid out those plans in two documents.
The first one, written in 1996, was entitled Clean Break, A New Strategy for Securing the Realm. And it argued for regime change in Iraq based on the pretext that Saddam Hussein was a security threat developing weapons of mass destruction. Sound familiar? The second document, written in February, called for much, much more than regime change. That document was entitled rebuilding America's defenses, strategies, forces, and resources for a new century.
This document laid out a plan that would require multiple wars of aggression and occupation so as to achieve a goal of full spectrum dominance. The name of the group proposing these criminal policies was the Project for a New American Century or PNAC, and their membership happens to read like a who's who in Jewish Israeli American politics. To be fair, the Project for a New American Century did have one token Islamic figure or, to use the terminology of the late, great Malcolm X, a lone house Muslim. Getting back to the plans of PNAC and the goal of full spectrum dominance, basically, this involves the American empire establishing global control of air, land, sea, and space, and cyberspace. In order to achieve this goal, a primary objective was to seize the world's largest energy reserves, specifically the oil and gas reserves of the former Soviet Republics in the Caspian Basin, as well as the oil of Iraq, the former requiring the control of a pipeline route to deliver said oil and gas to international markets.
Another objective was to establish permanent military bases in this strategic area so as to ensure rapid deployment to any trouble spots where the natives might just get a little bit restless. Now, the PNAC plan complemented another goal known as the Greater Israel Project. Going back to statements from the founder of Zionism, Theodore Herzl, the so called promised land extends from the Nile River of Egypt to the Euphrates in Iraq. In Oded Yanaan's A Strategy for Israel in the nineteen eighties, Israeli regional superiority was to be achieved through a process of reconfiguring the Middle East by the balkanization of the surrounding Arab states into smaller and weaker states divided along sectarian lines. Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia were all in the crosshairs, but Israeli strategists viewed Iraq as their biggest challenge of all.
And, thus, Iraq was outlined as the centerpiece to the balkanization of the Middle East. Iraq was to be divided into a Kurdish state, a Shiite Arab state, and a Sunni Arab state. The first step towards establishing this goal, however, was to instigate a war between Iraq and Iran, a war that would significantly weaken both states. So while Saddam Hussein served wonderfully as an attack dog against Iran, the moment he had fulfilled his utility, he became the Butcher of Baghdad and the Balkanization of Iraq merely required a pretext. And that brings us back to the PNAC lunatics and their full spectrum dominance agenda that required multiple wars and the inevitable bloodbath that would follow.
The only problem from their perspective was that the American public could not possibly be told the truth of this plan because there was simply no way that they would support it. So how would PNOC achieve this goal? Well, they acknowledged in writing that only one thing could deliver them the means to achieve their psychopathic dream and that was, quote, a new
Speaker 4: Pearl Harbor.
Speaker 0: Only such an event could whip the American public up into the fever pitch of vengeance that could serve as the pretext for multiple wars. And lo and behold, the gift of nine eleven was provided, And the farcical war on terror was born. Muslims became the new boogeyman. The clash of civilizations as envisioned by Zionist ideologue Bernard Lewis was instigated. And the Middle East would soon be set alight.
Understanding the motive, let us now look at the fingerprints. On 09/11, there were indeed five dancing celebrating Middle Easterners. The only problem was that they were Jewish Israelis. But you simply would never know this if you gathered your so called news from exclusively mainstream media. Nonetheless, five dancing Israelis were positioned at a prime vantage point to film the planes as they crashed into the Twin Towers.
And, yes, the Israelis were in place with camera directed at the towers before the first plane hit. A woman observing them was deeply troubled by their obvious joy, literally dancing and high fiving each other as the carnage of the day was playing out. She was so disturbed that she wrote down their license plate number and reported them to the police, who later arrested the individuals, two of whom being known Mossad agents.
Speaker 7: I grabbed my binoculars, and I could see the towers from my windows. And this is where I, you know, I'm looking. And all of a sudden, down there, I see this van parked. And I see three guys on top of the van, and I could see that they were, like, happy. You know?
They they they were they didn't look shocked to me. You know? They didn't look shocked. I thought it was very strange.
Speaker 5: We had received an all points bulletin, and, I just happened to see the van, you know, how it over my lieutenant. You know? And I think that could be the van. We checked it out, and it was. You know?
We were all on edge, obviously, so I really wasn't looking to make friends with these people, and neither were the officers that I were with. Once we started talking to them, you know, they were pretty much like, hey. You know, we're, you know, we're not against you. We're with you.
Speaker 8: And at that point, we were taken for another round of questioning, this time related to our allegedly being members of Masa'id.
Speaker 0: The fact of the matter is we
Speaker 8: are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. Our purpose was to document the event. Our purpose was to document the event.
Speaker 0: I'm gonna ask this question more than once. What if the dancing celebrating people were in fact Palestinian, Arab, or Muslim? Would there have been even one American of age who would not know about this? At this point, we need to talk about Mossad. Mossad is the Israeli equivalent of America's CIA or The UK's MI Six.
Mossad, like their American and British counterparts, are agents of state sponsored terrorism whose business involves political assassinations, car bombing, spying, as well as a host of other illegal and immoral activities. Importantly, the Mossad's motto just about says it all, by way of deception, thou shalt do war. Keep that motto in mind when I tell you that a month before nine eleven, the Mossad sent a general warning to the CIA alleging that as many as 200 terrorists were present on American soil and were preparing a major operation. The Mossad linked the plot to Osama bin Laden and told their CIA counterparts that there were, quote, strong grounds to suspect Iraqi involvement. On the evening of 09:11, two mysterious calls were placed to the New York City Police Department in which the callers claimed to have witnessed a group of Palestinians and Arabs constructing a bomb in a van that was headed towards Holland Tunnel.
The police apprehended the suspects, and the truck bomb story was independently reported by CNN, Fox News, ABC News, CBS News, and other major media outlets.
Speaker 9: And word late tonight that two suspects are in FBI custody after a truckload of explosives was discovered around the George Washington Bridge. That bridge, links, New York to New Jersey over the Hudson River. Whether the discovery of those explosives has anything to do with other events today is unclear, but the FBI has two suspects in hand, said the truck, load of explosives enough explosives were in the truck to do great damage to the George Washington Bridge. But they arrested these two suspects, and they are questioning them as we speak.
Speaker 1: Reports we're getting now, two or three men arrested on the New Jersey Parkway. Deborah, can you hear me now?
Speaker 10: Yes. I can. That is the information that I am getting from two sources that there was a van either on the New Jersey Turnpike or the Garden State Parkway, and that it was near the George Washington Bridge. There were two or three men who were in the van. The van was pulled over.
It is not clear why the van was pulled over, but when it was, law enforcers found, tons of explosives inside of the van.
Speaker 0: Perhaps you noticed that the ethnicity of the suspects arrested while attempting to detonate a massive bomb in New York City on 09/11 was not mentioned by any of the mainstream media. So I pose the question, if they were Palestinians, Arabs, or Muslims, do you think this detail might have been reported? Furthermore, what do you think the chances are that you would be unaware of this story if the culprits were, in fact, Palestinians, Arabs, or Muslims? Well, they weren't. They were Jewish Israelis.
And, this is a classic example of a false flag operation to which Israel has a long history. Probably, the most unusual, if not shocking, event of the day came in the form of another white van that was stopped by a New York Police Department on 09:11.
Speaker 4: I got a message on that, plane. It's it's a it's a big truck with a mural facing of a of an airplane diving into New York City and exploding. Blow us in the truck. The truck is in between Sixth And Seventh On King Street. Alright.
So listen. You need any further on those two guys over there. You alright over there, k? Yeah. Both suspects under k.
We have the suspects who drove in the van. The van exploded. We have both of them on there, k. Let's get
Speaker 0: Police recordings indicate that this van had a mural painted on the side that literally depicted a remote controlled plane crashing into the World Trade Center and exploding. The van's occupants were arrested and were referred to as ethnic Middle Easterners in a US government report. Of course, if they were Palestinian Arabs or Muslims, this incident would have been plastered all over the media as proof of an Arab Islamic conspiracy behind nine eleven. But few have ever heard of it simply because it was another bungled false flag for which Israelis were ultimately responsible.
Speaker 11: The Israeli newspaper, Ma'ariv, has reported Israel's Former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly said the September have been good for Israel. Netanyahu said, quote, we're benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon and the American struggle in Iraq, end quote.
Speaker 0: In November 2001, Fox News aired an explosive four part series detailing a secretive investigation that was being conducted by US authorities into Israeli espionage in The United States. The report revealed that around 200 Israeli spies had been arrested by American authorities, the largest spy ring to be uncovered in US history. 140 of these Israelis had been taken into custody just prior to nine eleven, and the remaining 60 had been apprehended shortly thereafter in connection with the ongoing investigation into the attacks. Many of the Israeli spies belong to the the Israeli military. Fortunately for the 200 Israeli spies, they had friends in very high places.
Michael Chertoff is a Jewish Israeli dual national who, as assistant attorney general, oversaw the noninvestigation of nine eleven in which the crucial evidence was all confiscated and destroyed before it could be examined. Chertoff's mother also happened to be a Mossad operative. Chertoff, along with other dual citizens in the US government, not only spearheaded the cover up, he orchestrated the release of over 200 Israeli suspects, including the five dancing Israelis. Those caught with their explosives in their van, as well as those caught with the van depicting a plane crashing into the Twin Towers. Many of these Israeli suspects failed multiple polygraph tests while in custody as well, but you probably have never heard of any of them.
And they were all quietly deported to Israel. Case closed. And then there is Rabbi Dov Zakhaim, another Israel First champion. In 02/2001, Zakhaim was CEO of SPC International, part of the System Planning Corporation, a defense contractor primarily investing in electronic warfare technologies, including remote controlled aircraft systems, and the notorious flight termination system, FTS technology that could hijack even a hijacked plane and land or crash it wherever. In addition, he was appointed as the Pentagon comptroller in May 2001.
During the same period, Donald Rumsfeld announced that the Pentagon could not account for $2,300,000,000,000.
Speaker 1: Okay. That $2,300,000,000,000 that you talked about the day before 09:11? Did you ever find it?
Speaker 12: The it was always there. And what the problem was was was tracking it through the system. So when I arrived in the Pentagon and they told me that they can't track $2,300,000,000 that had been accumulated over the period before I got there, it turns out that there was not a a a legal problem or a loss. It was a matter of of the complexity of the systems and tracking it all the way through. We
Speaker 1: got them.
Speaker 4: We got them. We got them.
Speaker 1: We got them. We got them. We got them. We got them.
Speaker 4: We got them. We got them. We got them. We got them.
Speaker 3: We got them. We got them. Sorry, guys. Sorry.
Speaker 0: Sockheim is also a coauthor of the project for a new American century's position paper, Rebuilding America's Defenses, making him intimately aware of the need for a, quote, new Pearl Harbor. It is time to confront another social taboo, and that would be the obvious motive that an overwhelmingly Jewish owned mainstream media has in showing Israel in a positive light while Palestinians, Arabs, and Muslims are demonized incessantly, especially since nine eleven. It is undeniably politically incorrect to say this, but I will say it anyway. The mainstream media is massively disproportionately Jewish owned, and the fact that people are afraid to admit this truth and discuss this blatantly favorable bias towards Israel is very revealing indeed. I think a Jewish correspondent for the Israeli newspaper Haaretz said it best.
Quote, the Jews do control the American media. This is very clear, and claiming otherwise is an insult to common knowledge. But me stating this relevant and important fact will not stop the inevitable attacks, and therein lies the effectiveness of stifling debate or critical investigations. Only those of us who do not fear loss of income, freedom, or even our lives are willing to say such things. But it is not the personal risks that matter.
My point here is to make clear that there is a serious conflict of interest when it comes to the reporting of nine eleven and so many other issues for that matter. But with regard to nine eleven, there is stunningly incriminating Jewish Zionist fingerprints all over the event. But I shall repeat, there is no possible way that Israel alone could have carried out the nine eleven operation. So let me be emphatically clear on this. There are many American traitors, some Jewish, many not, who swore to uphold the US constitution and yet committed high treason on 09/11.
Nine '11 was undoubtedly a joint false flag operation between the governments of Israel and The United States. If we had more time, I would also discuss the Israeli links to the anthrax mailings, Sibyl Emmons, Colin, Rowley, Able Danger, Mossad Front Company, Urban Moving Systems, the National Transportation Safety Board acknowledging that there is no evidence of wreckage at Ground 0 from American Airlines flight 11 or United Airlines flight one seventy five, P TECH's enterprise software and its links to Mossad, the corporation known as MITRE, which played a central role in subverting air traffic control networks on nine eleven, the Israeli owned Odigo instant messaging service that provided a warning to Jewish Israelis of the nine eleven events two hours before they occurred, Jewish judges like Alvin Hellerstein and Sheila Birnbaum who pressured the nine eleven victims' families into silence, ICTS, an Israeli company that provided airport security for every airport from which the allegedly hijacked planes operated, the killing of American patriot John O'Neil at the hands of Jerome Hauer, the nine eleven commission report failing to mention Building 7, the unprecedented put options predicting the fall of American and United Airlines stock, the overwhelming evidence that the Patriot Act was written years before nine eleven, and so many other truths slash coincidences that the mere thought of them makes my head spin.
Nine eleven is a magnifying glass into the character of every person in a position of public trust. When so called public servants profess their belief in the official myth that Muslims carried out this event, they reveal themselves as an untrustworthy moron at best, or more likely, prostitutes in the service of the tyrants. As uncomfortable as it may be to face up to, those who control the education, mass media, and the vast majority of governments are, in fact, prostitutes who have sold their soul and identifying them as as easy as looking at their stance on nine eleven. And this is the great gift of nine eleven. If we receive this gift, we will rid ourselves of the traitors and replace them with people of honor.
Calling for a new investigation is not enough. Calling for a new investigation will likely be used as the last ditch escape route for the traitors to produce yet another whitewash. Allowing the fox to guard the henhouse is madness. Allowing the criminals to judge who is guilty and who is not is beyond stupidity. We, the people, are the guardians of truth and justice, and we must create our own institutions or completely reform existing ones in order to affect justice.
I repeat, calling for a new investigation is not nearly enough. If the US government refuses to invalidate every law that is injurious to The United States constitution, then the traitors who have broken their oath to uphold the constitution must be arrested and forcibly removed by oath keeping patriots, at which point The US constitution shall be restored as the supreme law of the land. While the US military has been used as a tool of the empire, there lies before this military the opportunity to redeem itself. If the US military can find the courage and honor to do this, I will, for one, proudly claim my US citizenship. But more importantly, the world can finally be liberated from the yoke of the empire that is America today.
This is the primary duty of the citizens of my birth nation, and I believe the fate of The United States, indeed, the fate of the world, will be determined by their success or failure to restore the United States Constitution. Most of all, the time has come to confront the most important truth of all. And to do this, we need only stand in front of the nearest mirror. Take a good, hard look into your eyes and ask yourself, am I a coward or am I a man? And as for the women out there, ask yourself, am I the woman that I am meant to be?
The most beautiful thing that exists. Are you fulfilling your responsibility as a mother? Now make no mistake about this. It is our generation right here, right now, that will decide the fate of our world. So when our children ask us what role did you play, what do you suppose your answer will be?
@cosmicape888 - Optimus
Let’s get George Bush and Netanyajew to explain how CIA/MOSSAD pulled it off.
Video Transcript AI Summary
How could Mohammed Ada's passport survive the plane crash that supposedly cremated him, only to be found in readable condition within 48 hours? Why did these men even need passports for domestic flights? And if they were so easy to identify, why weren't these 19 accused Muslims under surveillance?
Then, three weeks after 9/11, the anthrax letters killed five people and were worded to blame Muslims, but it was proven that the anthrax came from a US army lab and was never mailed by Muslims. Also, there are no airport security videos of any of the 19 accused Muslims boarding any of the hijacked planes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How could Mohammed Ada's passport survive the fireball explosion that supposedly cremated him, fly out of his pocket, fly out of the incinerated plane, flutter to the ground in the two feet of debris, and end up in readable condition in the hands of investigators all within forty eight hours. Why did 19 Muslim men even need passports on domestic flights? How were passports found but not the plane's voice recorders? Why did the hijackers need passports they would never use again after their suicide flights? And why were the 19 accused Muslims not under surveillance on nine one one if they were so easy to identify?
The conspicuous trail of planted evidence continued three weeks after the nine one one attacks when anthrax letters killed five people and were clearly worded to throw the blame on Muslims. Death to America, death to Israel, Allah is great. It has since been proven that the anthrax came from a US army lab and was never mailed by Muslims. There are no airport security videos of any of the 19 accused Muslims boarding any of the hijacked planes.
@cosmicape888 - Optimus
Jewish Israeli citizen, Larry Silverstien made $5 billion off the 911 attacks. He’s great friends with Netanyahu. He was the owner of the wtc lease. He got the lease in July 2001. He ate breakfast everyday at wtc except ONE, 9/11.
Video Transcript AI Summary
One day, I got a call from the governor of New York, George Pataki's office, asking if I'd consider owning the World Trade Center. It was very good for my family.
On 9/11, I was getting ready to go to the dermatologist because I have light skin and can't take the sun. My wife insisted I go that morning and not go downtown. We got very lucky that day.
Later, I had to collect the insurance money. I called the new governor, Elliot Spitzer, an old friend, and explained that I needed his help to collect from the insurance companies. He listened and got me the $4.5 billion in six months. We were very lucky.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The governor of New York, George Pataki, decided one day that maybe it would be good to privatize the ownership of the World Trade Center. So I got a call from the governor's office, and they said, would you ever consider owning the World Trade Center? It was very, very good for the family, very good for for us, and we are very, very fortunate. On the morning of 09:11. I'm getting ready, getting dressed to go to the dermatologist.
I have light colored hair, light skin. The sun is a disaster for me. I can't take the sun. She said, okay. But you're going to the dermatologist.
You're going this morning, and you're not going downtown. We got very, very lucky. And I had an obligation to collect the insurance proceeds from the policies. A new governor was just elected, Elliot Spitzer, an old friend who I knew well. I said, Elliot, if you don't help me, I'll never collect from the insurance companies.
And guess what? He listened, and he said, you know what? You're entitled. I'm gonna get you the money. And in six months, he got me the 4 and a half billion dollars.
We got very, very lucky.
@cosmicape888 - Optimus
New court filings reveal that two of the Saudi hijackers of American Airlines Flight 77 on September 11th were recruited by a joint CIA-Saudi intelligence operation that was covered up at the highest level.
@cosmicape888 - Optimus
Pentagon was hit by a missile. Why would the govt say it was a plane that crashed into the building?
@cosmicape888 - Optimus
@_NicoleNonya - Use Yandex Search Engine for Anti Zionist searches
Alleged black box recording, A Jew speaking botched Arabic. accent Israel did 911. Accused pedo blackmailed Cheney and Bush helped Israel murder Americans and frame the Muslims. https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2015/01/14/george-bush-pedophile-sex-ring-and-blackmail-of-congress/
Video Transcript AI Summary
The voice of a hijacker from the plane's voice recorder has an accent that sounds like Israeli Hebrew.
A transmission seconds later warns, "Nobody move. Everything will do to you. They're trying to make any move."
FBI director Mueller, BBC News, and ABC confirmed that seven of the nineteen Muslims, who were named as the hijackers, are actually still alive. They are victims of identity theft. Another accused Muslim died a year before the 9/11 attacks. Who stole their identities, and why isn't the FBI investigating? If the hijackers were Muslim, why steal Muslim identities? Wouldn't they steal Israeli identities to blame Israelis? If the hijackers were Israeli, wouldn't they steal Muslim identities to blame Muslims?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The voice of the hijacker heard from the hijacked plane's voice recorder reveals that the accent of the hijacker matches an Israeli Hebrew accent.
Speaker 1: The next transmission comes seconds later. Nobody move. Everything will do to you. They're trying to make any move. The data itself and the update.
Just take one
Speaker 0: FBI director Mueller, BBC News, and ABC have confirmed that seven of the 19 Muslims whose mugshots were flashed around the world did not die in the nine one one crashes. They are alive and well and are victims of identity theft. An eighth accused Muslim died one year before the nine one one hijackings even occurred. Who stole their identities and why isn't the FBI looking for them? If the hijackers really were Muslims, why would they steal the identities of fellow Muslims and implicate them?
Wouldn't they be more likely to steal Israeli identities and put the blame on Israelis? If the hijackers were Israelis, wouldn't they be likely to steal the identities of Muslims and put the blame on Muslims?
George Bush Pedophile Sex Ring and Blackmail of Congress
[After you have read this post about George Bush please check these out this post, it tells you the world power structure and the child trafficking rings... The Five Child trafficking Networks of the Illuminati [111] These are on Human Hunting... A Most Dangerous Game – Human Hunting [3] Brice Taylor 3 Brice Taylor was…
cathyfox.wordpress.com
@uzmebi - uzmebi
@BTaplow64726 @KimJongwins @Inevitablewest @DillyHussain88 @AdameMedia @AfD @elonmusk That's an FBI document with evidence of parachute cords found. Other declassified FBI documents prove an insider confirmed 7 tickets for Flight 11 without payment, 4 were in the name of "Cooper." Ex-Sayeret Matkal operative and Arabic speaker, Daniel Lewin was on Flight 11.
@cosmicape888 - Optimus
@cosmicape888 - Optimus
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Fun fact, Jewish Israeli Double agent Michael Chertoff, who worked in our department of Homeland Security, was coauthor of the Patriot Act, and was responsible for sending the “Dancing Israelis” back to Israel scott free, is a a descendent of a line of Russian Talmudic Jewish Rabbis. Chertoff- means devil or demon 😈 in Russian.
reSee.it AI Summary
Rockefeller hired Henry Kissinger, who then hired Klaus Schwabb. Schwabb helped popularize human-caused global warming through the Club of Rome. Central planning was organized by Kissinger at Bilderberg Group meetings. The elites disseminate their agendas through organizations like the WEF, using heads of state and politicians to control legislation. Schwabb proudly stated that they have influence in various cabinets worldwide.
@cosmicape888 - Optimus
Rockefeller hired Henry Kissinger (who ran the Bilderberg Group) who then hired Klaus Schwabb (who runs the WEF).
Video Transcript AI Summary
David mentioned Henry Kissinger's early connection with the Rockefeller family due to his work on nuclear weapons. Kissinger's relationship with the Rockefellers grew as he became Nelson Rockefeller's foreign policy advisor. Kissinger's influence as an international statesman remains strong even years after his time as secretary of state. The speaker's life was transformed by a seminar led by Kissinger, sparking a lasting friendship and interest in geopolitics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And you mentioned, David, Henry Kissinger. And I think he first, was noticed by the Rockefeller family after he, wrote a, a very erudite work on nuclear weapons and nuclear war back in
Speaker 1: the late 19 fifties. Wilson's in foreign policy. Right. It's then published. And,
Speaker 0: from that time on, he became pretty close to the Rockefeller family.
Speaker 1: Well, he did. Actually, I guess I was the first one who got to know him because, he was a member of an organization called the Council on Foreign Relations in New York. And there was a a study group at that time that he, as then a, young instructor at Harvard, presided at. I was so impressed by him that, I introduced him to my brother Nelson, who was then governor in New York and was then considering seeking the presidency of the United States. They became great friends and actually, Henry became Nelson's foreign policy adviser as long as he was in public life.
And I think he is one of the remarkable international statesmen in the world today. Even 30 years after he was secretary of state, he is still asked by heads of state when he travels the world, for their for his advice.
Speaker 2: Let me go back to the time you said when you came here, it transformed your life. Was there a course, a professor who really made that difference for you?
Speaker 3: Yes. There was, one course, one seminar of, Henry Kissinger, which really opened my eyes. I wasn't accepted to the seminar but I set in. I think he let me in because I was German and and it was relatively shortly after the war, there were not too many Germans here and this created a friendship which has endured until today and, you know, Henry has been several times in Davos. And I think it was mainly participating in his seminars that I developed my interest for geopolitical affair.
@cosmicape888 - Optimus
Klaus Scwabb helped the Club of Rome (Freemason Masonic Temple started by David Rockeffeller in Italy) popularise human caused global warming.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I have been involved in climate change for 25 years, starting in 1973. I was the one who first gave the Club of Rome a major platform. I share your concerns and believe we can address these issues by fixing our global architecture and system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've worked on climate change for 25 years. I've worked on climate change since 73. So you Just to tell you because I was the person who gave the Club of Rome the 1st big platform. I share with you the concern, and, I think we can solve those issues only if we repair our global architecture and our global system.
@cosmicape888 - Optimus
Central planning was organised by Henry Kissinger at the Bilderberg Group meetings. https://rumble.com/v2dwxlq-conspiracy-theory-with-jesse-ventura-season-1-episode-5-secret-societies-12.html
Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura - Season 1 Episode 5 - "Secret Societies" - 12.30.2009
They're a group of the world's elite who meet once a year at a luxury hotel and decide how they will run the world. The Great Reset (aka The New World Order) is the culmination of their efforts that s
rumble.com
@cosmicape888 - Optimus
Once these elites have decided upon their plan/goals in the Bilderberg meeting, they disseminate their agendas through organisations like the WEF (run by Klaus Schwab). Heads of state, influential celebrities and politicians are used to bake their plans into our legislation to control us.
@cosmicape888 - Optimus
Klaus is the head of the WEF said: "What we are very proud of now [is] that we penetrate the cabinets. [More than half of the Canadian cabinet ministers] are actually Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum... It's true in Argentina, and it's true in France now, with the president [being] a Young Global Leader."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the integration of young leaders in the World Economic Forum, highlighting figures like Merkel and Trudeau. They mention how many young leaders are now part of cabinets in countries like Canada and Argentina. Another speaker raises concerns about outside interference in democracy by the World Economic Forum, questioning which cabinet ministers are involved. The debate becomes heated, with accusations of promoting disinformation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This, notion to integrate young leaders is part of the World Economic Conference since many years. When I mentioned our names like, this is Merkel, even Vladimir Putin and so on, they all have been young global leaders of the World Economic Forum. But what we are very proud of now is the young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, President of Argentina and so on, so that we penetrate the cabinets. So yesterday, I was at a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau and I would know that half of this cabinet or even more half of this cabinet are for our actually young double leaders of the vertical reform. And that's true in Argentina too.
Well, sorry. That's true in Argentina as well. It's true in Argentina and, it's true in France now. I'm here with the president, with the young global leader, but
Speaker 1: Questions and comments. The honorable member for Oshawa.
Speaker 2: Thank you, mister speaker, and I listened to my colleague's speech. I had a constituent that wanted me to ask about outside interference to our democracy. Klaus Schwab is the head of the World Economic Forum, and he bragged how his subversive w w w e f, World Economic Forum, has quoted infiltrated governments around the world. He said that his organization had penetrated more than half of Canada's cabinet. I was wondering in the interest of transparency, could the member please name which cabinet ministers are on board with the WEF's agenda?
My concern is the deputy
Speaker 1: order, order, order. I I know he was I know that, the member was in a a really good good question there, but the the the audio is really really bad and the video is really really bad as well. And I and I and I apologize. I don't know if if the member okay. Let's let's, let's try again.
The honor the the the honorable member for Tim and James Bay.
Speaker 2: Mister speaker, that member is promoting open disinformation. That's not debate. We have to call up this inform
Speaker 1: we'll get into debate again. The honorable member, questions and comments? The honorable member for Lambton Kent Middlesex.
reSee.it AI Summary
A discussion delves into the elusive "they" controlling media and orchestrating events, implicating the World Economic Forum and influential figures in a grand scheme. Whistleblower evidence exposes collusion, manipulation, and corruption at the highest levels, with plans to dismantle their power by 2025.
@veryvirology - Adam Gaertner 🇺🇸
Who is "they"? Everyone always says "they." "They" control the media. "They" are trying to kill us all. "They" released the bioweapons. Rarely does anybody actually identify "they." I'll tell you, and I'll share a few excerpts from a meeting I had with a Senator some time ago. I've been silent on this, but quite a bit of time has passed now, and the information has been put to good use, so I'm not going to reveal anything damaging here. Knowing some of these things, and knowing that that knowledge has gone where it needs to go, is one part of what makes me so confident that come Jan '25, we will be setting this right, and justice will be done. The topic was the many and varied corrupt elements and actions that facilitated the Covid pandemic, and the available evidence thereof. A whistleblower came forward, with our help, with reams of damning evidence. Suppressed treatments; deliberate murder; deliberate dysfunction of the hospital systems at large; conspiracy to mislead the public and further the propaganda narrative. Emails, testimony, events, times, places, and people. "They" are the World Economic Forum, their attendees, members, employees, and the people that work for those people. Leaders of big business, leaders of key institutions, politicians, FBI, CIA, MI6 and other foreign agents, artists and actors, journalists and media owners, senior and/or well-placed key federal and state bureaucrats and elected officials, agency and department heads, leaders of banks, hedge funds, pension funds and various financial institutions. In aggregate, "they" are us. They are the many and varied people that have reached the tops of their fields, whether by excellence, election, corruption, or the many and varied other ways that they end up in those positions. They are the "best" of us, drawn in by the glamour, status, social circles and riches that the WEF promises, in exchange for their allegiance and adherence to the rules and orders they are given. They operate at several levels. The most senior of them are given their marching orders and ideologies right from the top; Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, Rockefellers & Rothschilds, so on. While it could be said that they're the true "they," the only reason they have any power is because all of those people follow and adhere to them. They're the ones that are complicit, and know exactly what they're doing and why. Subsequent to that, and working independently, they collaborate. The whistleblower provided evidence of secret meetings, of several different kinds. One kind is the collusion between industry heads. They get together, whether for lunch or dinner, or at retreats like the Bohemian Grove, discuss their plans and how they're progressing, and make new ones, knowing what's coming up next, such that the institutions that they lead will play their part to further the WEF's goals. Intelligence services coordinate where necessary, but by and large they work independently. This is, for instance, how pretty much every hospital came to follow very similar protocols for the isolation, mistreatment and eventual murders of their Covid patients; how grocery stores all laid down their little one-way aisle signs; how the major scientific journals all refused to accept and publish good science on proper treatment; how every MSM outlet in the country and across the world all parrot the same narrative at the same time. From there on down, you've got the C-suites and the lower levels of senior leadership. They might be in on it, or they might not be; Andrew Huff @AGHuff, former VP of Ecohealth, is a perfect example of an otherwise senior leader, of a critical institution, that was otherwise unaware of what was happening, horrified when he found out, and spent the next four years trying to blow the whistle, and being targeted for it. Dr. Mike Yeadon is another such example. By and large, it is only the most senior leaders of these institutions that are "in on it." Then you have the corrupt people in key positions. Specific scientists like Dr. Andrew Hill, responsible for allowing the falsification of conclusions on his ivermectin study in late 2020; that Florida data scientist that was removed and charged; the talking heads with mile-long lists of credentials that appear on CNN to fearmonger about something or other. The whistleblower described a well-reputed doctor being taken to a retreat, with Dr. Fauci and some other functionaries; subsequently, he started appearing on TV, talking up the chaos and mass death at a hospital that was, in reality, dead quiet, while the rest of the staff cracked jokes, laughed at him, and wondered what on Earth he was talking about. They're the people that have been promised some sum of money, or a trip to Epstein Island, or some other enticement or threat, to do whatever it is that needs to be done by a person in their position. They're not "in on it," and they occasionally end up dead if they stray, but they're vital in their own capacities, whether big or little. They are handled by intelligence agents of various stripes, whether sanctioned or otherwise. That's about it. That's who "they" are. It is all centrally organized through the World Economic Forum, which has become the nexus of the numerous otherwise competing "powers that be," and these leaders of their various institutions act like terrorist cells, operating largely independently, coordinated where necessary, and all furthering the goals of those "powers that be," all under Klaus Schwab's umbrella, toward a world where they will remain rich and powerful forever, and exert their will to shape that world however they see fit. Those networks are known now, and they are being watched, and in being watched, their power and reach has been massively degraded. Come '25 and beyond, they will be obliterated, and our world will be retaken, after hundreds of years of their control. That is why "they" are so deathly afraid of Trump. The game is up. All that's left is time.
@cosmicape888 - Optimus
@veryvirology https://t.co/vDpRxJa3uT