TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @damonimani
@damonimani - Damon Imani
2025 Wrapped: Highlights of my conversations with the hyenas on The View. Enjoy! https://t.co/sIAn9DNuLX
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a 40-minute compilation, Damon Imani presents a series of contentious exchanges with The View’s hosts, framing it as some of the “absurd and deranged takes” from the show and his responses to them. He opens by noting that in 2025 he had nearly 100 clip conversations with The View’s hosts and that he sent them a framed gift—FedEx confirmed delivery to the studio, though he says he does not know if they kept it. He highlights a clip in which he pressed Sunny Hostin on reparations for slaveholding ancestors, which he says received over 27,000,000 views, a record for the show. He asserts that the hosts “hate my guts” and that he critiques their alleged hypocrisy and “bullshit” daily from Denmark.
Key exchanges and themes run throughout:
- Immigration and work: The panel discusses Trump’s stance on illegal immigrants taking jobs, with Speaker 0 urging a distinction between legal and illegal immigration. The group debates job availability and immigration policy, with back-and-forth questioning about what is meant by “the difference between legal and illegal immigrants.”
- Gender roles and DEI: Sunny is criticized for comments about women’s opportunities and affirmative action. Speaker 0 argues DEI programs discriminate against more qualified applicants, while Sunny defends protections for women and minorities and argues against woke “oppression” narratives. The conversation touches on gender roles, with Sunny describing supportive domestic work by a partner; Speaker 0 contends this contradicts previous critiques of men.
- Wealth inequality and philanthropy: Joy and others discuss wealth, the World Food Program’s suggested priorities, and the responsibility of billionaires to aid global causes. Speaker 0 interrupts to question Joy’s net worth relative to charitable action, suggesting reparations as a personal example.
- Trump and media: The panel debates Trump’s consistency, media portrayal, and political double standards. Speaker 0 accuses the liberal media of fakery, while others compare Trump’s diplomacy to past criticisms of his behavior. The segment also touches on Trump’s impeachment-era rhetoric and coverage, including discussions of dictators, civility, and the ethics of political messaging.
- Race, history, and representation: The discussion includes provocative lines about “White History Month,” and the portrayal of race in immigration and crime. Speaker 0 and others debate how crime statistics and immigrant appearances intersect with policy narratives, with contributions about melanin, geography, and implicit biases.
- Religion, culture, and social values: The panel discusses religious symbols, memes, and public discourse around Christian and Catholic imagery, with references to mocking depictions and the legitimacy of free expression on public airwaves. A debate about the ethics of political memes versus real-world symbols emerges.
- Education and governance: There is debate about the Department of Education, its dismantling, and shifting control to states. One participant entertains the idea that dismantling federal control could empower states to tailor education.
- Public safety and free speech: The dialogue covers threats and violence linked to political rhetoric, the First Amendment, and the tension between expressing beliefs and the consequences of those expressions in political life. The discussion also critiques media coverage of violence and protest, arguing about responsibility and accountability on both sides.
- Personal narratives and family: The panel includes personal anecdotes about marriage, parenting, and representation in media, including references to individual experiences with marriage, single life, and the pursuit of balance in leadership and family roles.
- Endnote: The show wraps with a nod to the host’s own channel and a holiday closing, inviting viewers to subscribe for more commentary.
Overall, the transcript portrays a polarized, high-energy debate in which Damon Imani challenges The View’s hosts on reparations, woke culture, gender and DEI, immigration, domestic politics, and media responsibility, peppered with provocative humor, sharp rebuttals, and personal jab-for-jab exchanges.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2025 I had almost 100 conversations in form of clips with the brightest minds on TV, the hosts of The View. A few months ago, I even sent them a very beautiful gift, a framed with a photo of the hosts and their favorite guests. Me. And I was notified by FedEx that the studio received and signed for the shipment. So they got it.
Now whether they kept it or not, I don know. But given that they hate my guts, I would assume that they threw it out. And I don blame them for that. I mean, among the many clips, the one where I pressed Sunny Race Hustler to pay reparations for her slave owning ancestors received over 27,000,000 views, which is a record and more than any other individual clip or segment in the show s twenty eight year history. So I understand if the hosts don t want to be reminded about a nobody guy who on a daily basis ratios the hell out of their show by calling out their hypocrisy, their lies, and their bullshit all the way from Denmark.
Anyway, here is around forty minutes of the most absurd and deranged takes by the geniuses along with my responses to them. Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, Blessings, Sit back and enjoy.
Speaker 1: Trump ran on, let's get all the immigrants out of the country so that Americans Well, that's why
Speaker 2: we couldn't
Speaker 3: get rid
Speaker 1: of the jobs. And now they're saying, oh, sorry. You can't do the job. The lie was that we're gonna get rid of the immigrants so that you will have more jobs. And now they're saying new job.
You can't let them work. I'm
Speaker 0: not much. We've been through this before. He wants to get rid of the illegal immigrants who are taking people's jobs. But since you keep misrepresenting these statements, I'm going to have to ask you: Can you tell me the difference between legal and illegal immigrants? Let's go!
Speaker 3: I'm not sure. Say what?
Speaker 0: Let's let's just finish this.
Speaker 3: We'll be right.
Speaker 4: But I love the fact that, you know, Manny is younger, and it's very helpful that he's handy. And when we travel, I'm not picking up any bags. He's the one that's hefting them over overhead. Throws the garbage out. He does the heavy stuff.
Speaker 0: Well, right, Sunny, but plenty of times, every single one of you on this show slammed men and called them misogynists for saying that they prefer women who clean, cook, and take care of the children, yet now you just praised some of men's duties, like picking up your bags and taking out the trash. So, to me, it sounds like you have no issues with gender roles when it benefits you.
Speaker 1: They need to they need to start shelling their money out. These guys, Bezos and what's that? Musk, do they think that they're gonna live forever, these people? You know, everybody dies. According to the World Food Program, we could end world hunger by 2030 with $40,000,000,000, and nothing is done with that money to help people.
It's just to Well, increase their
Speaker 0: Joy, your net worth should not be over $30,000,000 if you were doing anything with your money to help people. So I think you want to sit this one out.
Speaker 2: If if you opposed and stood up against Trump in 2017, but you were there now. If you spoke up against Trump 01/07/2021, but you were there now applauding him like a trained seal, Donald Trump has not changed. You've changed.
Speaker 0: I agree with you, actually. Trump did not change. People did. And they changed after they stopped watching and getting their news from the corporate activist media, such as yours, a table of very unstable people, by the way which has been acting as the hand of the democratic establishment to vilify and demonize Trump by all means. So, I would say that's a change for good, won't you?
Speaker 4: Women were really the the most, they gained the most advantages from affirmative action. And so this is a war on women, I think it's, a war on people of color, and so what we're seeing is an attack, not on necessarily DEI or wokeness, we're seeing an attack on the very fabric of our company, which is opportunity for all, including women.
Speaker 0: Well, Sonny, women have the opportunity if they have better qualifications than others applying for a given job, but the DEI tells companies not to aim for the best and the most qualified applicant, instead to hire based on the right skin color, the perfect pronoun, and the trendiest gender identity just so they can check all the boxes under diversity form. And by doing that, they are discriminating against those who are more qualified. I mean, you are the perfect example of this, Sunny. You are a lawyer, yet, most of the time, you have no idea what you're talking about. So, I would never hire you.
And that would not be because you're black or you're a woman, but because, again, you have no idea what you're talking about.
Speaker 4: It it angers me when people are like, this woke stuff has got to go. That's telling me that you don't care about my lived experience, you don't care about the oppression of the LGBTQ community, you don't care about the oppression of the disabled, you don't care about the oppression of immigrants, you don't care about your fellow neighbor and that is ungodly, that is not Christian.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah, but they, you know what the most ironic thing is? They don't care about it and they don't care about it while wearing big fat crosses around Yes, their yes. Well,
Speaker 0: yeah. Wait, I've to step in here. Sunny, about your lived experience, you're doing better than over 99% of the country. You're not oppressed, and no one is oppressing the disabled. They are oppressed by their disability.
And with LGBT, well, taking over every corporation, running the culture with an entire month in your name, and turning every criticism into a hate crime is not exactly oppression. It's called a privilege that others do not have, and with immigrants, I'm an immigrant. I am not oppressed, Sonny. I have the same opportunities as everyone else, and I'm absolutely offended by condescending liberals like you telling me that I am a victim and that I'm oppressed. And all of this cuts right into the core of your wokeness, trading righteousness and virtue signaling to look good while shutting down everyone who doesn't bow to a narrative, like calling Christians ungodly for not being woke.
By the way, try saying that to Muslims who are not woke either, and you will quickly realize just how kind Christians have been to you.
Speaker 3: Is this the immigration system fix that people had in mind when they voted, do you think?
Speaker 4: I think there's a very clear message as to what this president wants the look of a criminal migrant to look like, and I think that's racist. Let me also say
Speaker 0: But but wait a minute, Sunny. Most criminal immigrants look the way they look. They are brown because they come from regions closer to the Equator where UV radiation is higher. Therefore, they have more melanin, which makes the skin darker. So, I know this is surprising to you, but Trump did not do that.
Nature and genetics did. They are the true racists.
Speaker 3: February is still Black History Month. And when it's Native American History Month or it's Chicano or Latino History Month, we're gonna celebrate those two.
Speaker 0: I think we should celebrate White History Month too. I mean, the Industrial Revolution, much of modern science, technology, and infrastructure, all of it were pioneered by white people, not to mention the best countries on the planet being white countries. So, I think we should celebrate White History Month, and obviously it should be July. Summer is in full swing, the barbecue is crackling with juicier steaks. Okay?
The lemonade, so cold, is practically sweating. And the sweetest smell, oh, the sweetest smell of freshly cut grass. All of that just screams white.
Speaker 5: She goes on to talk about how he puts animals in blenders to feed his birds of prey. Baby chicks and mice. The point here is think about the mentality of what it takes to physically do what you're asking that person to do and stop. There are stories about people that kill animals and what you need to lack to be able to do that. This man seems dangerous.
Speaker 0: Well, Sarah, experiments funded by a very good friend of this show, Doctor. Fauci, locked puppies inside cages with their head in boxes filled with sandflies, eating their faces alive. Now, dad is a dangerous man, I would say a psycho, but he's a friend of yours, okay? Not someone who feeds their birds of prey their natural diet. So, clearly, you don't have any idea how feeding a predatory animal or the food chain in general works because you live inside a Disney La la Land where Simba has gone vegan.
And I would say, thank God that you don't have any birds of prey because if you did, they would be dead from hunger by now. Well, Elon, I'm a little worried particularly with this USAID stuff.
Speaker 3: And let's not forget, USAID advances national security works to protect human rights and improve global health. So why they're going after that?
Speaker 0: Well, let me first Bill, frankly, I think you should rather be worried about the Epstein client list. Okay? So your question, Whoopi, why are they going after USAID? How about a pull up a list? This one is not as famous as the list that you're familiar with, but this is a list of the taxpayer funded USAID projects.
$6,000,000 to fund tourism in Egypt, $8,000,000 to political, a propaganda arm of the Democratic Party, just like this show, $47,000 for transgender opera in Colombia. What is that about? $2,000,000 for sex changes in Guatemala. You will love this one, Bill. $1,000,000 for Beth's research in Wuhan, China.
$20,000,000 on a new Sesame Street show in Iraq, like it's US taxpayers' responsibility to bring fucking Cooking Monster to Iraq. The I'm
Speaker 3: just gonna we're gonna go to break.
Speaker 5: You have to grab, you you
Speaker 1: need a candidate who's like Trump on the left. Somebody who speaks the vernacular. He comes out there and he's he might as well say, oh, I got a hemorrhoid today. And and people like it because it's real.
Speaker 0: Well, you said it, Joy. Trump is real, and I don't think you were supposed to say that, but it's true. The modern left and the Democrats, they are the fakest people in politics, on a script all the time. They put on nice faces, they say all the nice words, yet completely untouched with reality, and people notice that. No one likes fakery, okay?
Not to mention that fake moral high ground from your people, like Sonny, you scream cultural appropriation all the time, yet here you are, I look at you. I say congratulations with your new hairstyle. It looks good on you, but you straightened it, and you colored it blonde. That's still in white people's culture.
Speaker 6: And unfortunately, we see that ever since day one, baby, that pen been going and it ain't stopped, and it's steamrolling over all of our rights and our liberties and our freedoms and everything that we thought was the foundation of this country, our constitution.
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 6: Seems like we're saying, well, nope. With a pen, get rid of the constitution. With a pen, get rid of impoundment and other laws that exist.
Speaker 0: Well, Jasmeen, I can you give me one example of something in the Constitution that Trump has gotten rid of or a right that he has taken away from you? Just one example. Anyone?
Speaker 7: For women out there in America, if you are leaving a marriage, first of all, I applaud you for making a decision for you and doing what's right for you. It's hard to pick yourself when you become one with somebody because you're one. And then all of a sudden when things are bad, have to just choose you. Yeah. So I went into a business that I was passionate about, which is decor and hair, and I'm acting now, so
Speaker 0: Well, Portia, after listening to all of that, I see why you had two failed marriages. We should encourage women not to leave a marriage. Of course, there are exceptions like abuse and other things, but when you say to women out there, I applaud you for making decisions for you and doing what's right for you, it's not all about you. You make decisions that's good for the outcome of your children, which is to grow up with something called a father in the household. I mean, study after study shows that kids with both parents do better with grades, friends, and future, okay?
So, I think, with that advice of yours, you're basically encouraging women to follow your path, sacrifice their kids to play the main character, maybe have a career if they're lucky, yet still end up miserable like Whoopi.
Speaker 3: Maybe some of what's happening, like, you know, they're trying to take apart the Department of Education.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 3: Maybe that is a good thing because maybe it will force us to make sure that our kids actually get what they need. Maybe it'll force us to go to our state and say, listen, I wanna make sure since you're taking all this money from my taxes, I wanna make sure that my kids get exactly what they need. I don't have to wait for the government to do it, we can do it. This is now in our hands.
Speaker 0: Well, Wupi, that's a very interesting take there, because you've been wailing and wallowing about Trump's every single move, including dismantling the Department of Education. And now you're saying that maybe that's a good thing since dismantling it would shift the control to the states. So, I'm not sure if you realize this, but for the first time, you just agreed with Trump. You just became a Trump supporter. I don't understand.
Speaker 3: Just part of the problem that the trans community is facing, and it's the same problem that women face, is if you don't know anything about our bodies, you don't know how it works.
Speaker 1: Mhmm.
Speaker 3: So when you come in and you say, oh, you know, these men are these are men, you know Competing against women. Competing against You're assuming that the women are weak and just can't do anything yourself. Have you seen female athletes? They know what they're doing. So, I'm not sure what's going on, or why this is an issue.
Speaker 0: Well, it's an issue because men are physically stronger than women will be. That's just science and biology.
Speaker 4: From my perspective, I'm looking at this, and I'm thinking no country can count on America anymore. They're going to ice us out economically. We're going to be on our own because they're not going to be able to depend on a country that every four years could nominate could elect a dictator.
Speaker 0: Sonny, that hurt my brain. So, you just said a country that could elect a dictator before years. Right there, the word elect is the keyword. Elect, election, people vote on elections, to elect. So if people vote to elect a dictator every four years, that means you have a perfectly working democracy.
No?
Speaker 3: The White House is looking into offering $5,000 cash bonuses for women to have more babies.
Speaker 4: When I looked into that, they're saying that The US birth rate is declining. However, in 2024, there was a 1% increase in US births, but that increase was with Hispanic mothers and Asian mothers. So they don't seem to be concerned about that increase. They seem to be more concerned about a decrease in other populations. Say it.
White children, it's not based on a study. I just leave that with all of you.
Speaker 0: Well, Sunny, if you are worried about white Americans reproducing more children, perhaps you should encourage black women not to have the highest abortion rate in America.
Speaker 2: Him tweeting out an AI created image and the White House official account of him posing as the pope is disrespectful, it is frankly disgusting, and it is outrageous. And so all of those devout Catholics that voted for Donald Trump, I think you need to ask yourself some questions, and I think you need to ask the the White House and and Donald Trump some questions because Trump, mister president, it's it's his holiness, the pope, not his oiliness, the dope.
Speaker 0: And you're a sanctimonious joke. But look, the bigger picture is right here in my pocket, and I will pull it out. This is Rihanna dressed as a pope. Olympics twenty twenty four mocking Jesus Christ's last meal. Over here, camera.
Over here. Don't run. Don't run because Trombonely posted a meme. But these are actual photos, and I don't see that same energy of Yorzana when it comes to Hollywood actually mocking God. This is Madonna on a cross as Jesus Christ.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back.
Speaker 4: I did Finding Your Roots, as a lot of people know.
Speaker 1: I did too.
Speaker 4: Yeah, and I found out some things.
Speaker 1: They found Brunette, by the way.
Speaker 4: Yeah, they did, they did, they did. And a part that we did not air is that my father found out that the man he thought was his father was not his biological father.
Speaker 1: But when did
Speaker 4: he find out? He found out during the taping, he was there with
Speaker 0: Just for the record, Sunny, you also found out that your ancestors owned the slaves. And I believe you talked about it on the show at some point, but I wasn't here. So, now that we are all here, you have constantly argued that white people today should pay reparations for slavery even though they had no part in it and that many of their ancestors never owned the slaves. But now, we know that your ancestors owned slaves. So, by speaking your language and holding your own standards, you have a net worth of $6,000,000 and if you spend only 1% of it for reparations, which would be $60,000 you can pay $1,000 to 60 black people each.
Although $1,000 is not a lot of money, I think it's enough for you to be a role model of what you preach. So, I think now would be the perfect time. I can already see black people in the audience. So, go ahead, pay your reparations. I'm sure they take PayPal or Venmo.
Speaker 8: Men's aging faces are considered dignified and sexy and they have salt and pepper hair. When do you ever hear women described as having salt
Speaker 1: pepper hair? You know what? Women can do whatever they want to make themselves look better. What's wrong with that? But there's
Speaker 8: a culture in thinking that that's what looks better specifically We on shoot men in high definition and we make women airbrush like emojis. And so I don't like that. I don't want to have Botox. I don't want to have filler. I don't want to have a facelift.
I'm enjoying my gray hairs.
Speaker 0: Well, Jamila, you are sitting here with dyed hair and a pound of makeup on your face, preaching about being natural. That's silly, no?
Speaker 1: You know what bothers me when I see something like that is why are these ICE agents wearing masks? I mean, they're completely said COVID was over. So why Yeah. We're doing COVID.
Speaker 3: A lot
Speaker 1: of these people are objecting to masks. They're wearing masks so that you don't identify them. What's -Because that is very jackbooty.
Speaker 0: -Okay, Joyce, so you have these agents lawfully enforcing immigration policy. And while that's happening, you have the for all life media, including this show, calling it illegal, demonizing the agents, and further radicalizing the already violent far left lunatics. And those far left lunatics are out there taking pictures of the faces of those agents and posting them online with death threats to their families, their kids, and themselves. So obviously those agents are now wearing masks, which I understand is not a good look, but as I explained, it's a norm that was set as a result of the way you demonize these agents.
Speaker 3: We'll be right back. You cannot remove us. You cannot wipe us out, whether we're gay, straight, Asian, black, female. You're not gonna be able to get rid of us. We are here.
We are Americans.
Speaker 0: Well, we I don't think anyone is trying to wipe your liberal coalition. You're chemically castrating yourselves, you are the party of abortion, and you're having less kids while conservatives are having more, so you're wiping yourselves out, and I would say, more power to you, you're body of choice.
Speaker 7: Marriage is so hard. I mean, it's just hard. Yeah.
Speaker 2: And I think, you know, we fantasize about how easy it is, but until you've been married, you just don't it's a lot of commitment, a lot of give and take.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: And you know, I like to do more taking sometimes than giving.
Speaker 5: So I'm
Speaker 2: happily single. I have my two beautiful boys, but I I like myself. You know, so many women are obsessed with relationships. I like to date myself.
Speaker 0: No, you don't. You are miserable. I mean, you say you like to date yourself, but you are a main cast member on The Housewives of Atlanta, where you're chasing men. And I would say marriage is definitely hard when you're dealing with someone as self obsessed as you, not to mention your entire marriage was a central storyline on a reality show that's all about fights, shade, and personal branding. And no wonder you don't get why women are obsessed with relationships when your entire career thrives on cycling through men for drama, which is why I think the show is more of a hose of Atlanta than housewives because real housewives are in the kitchen cooking food, not chasing cameras.
Speaker 4: I'm 56. I've I've I've seen a couple of presidents. I've never seen so much theater in these cabinet meetings. Isn't serious stuff supposed to be occurring in these cabinet meetings?
Speaker 5: What do people say?
Speaker 4: It's just not normal for the media to linger only so that they can listen while the Cabinet people effusively, like, kiss his butt. Well,
Speaker 0: is holding open Cabinet meetings now supposed to be a bad thing? You invite the media, you gather your cabinets, they talk about the things they've been up to, so you can directly communicate your updates with the American people whom you work for. It's called transparency.
Speaker 3: We'll be right back. I'm not listening to y'all anymore. I'm not listening to you. He's telling people that, you know, they shouldn't be taking Tylenol unless they have a high, high, high, high feeling. Dude, you're not a doctor.
No studies have shown that Tylenol is directly causing autism.
Speaker 0: Here you go, a study by Harvard. Using acetaminophen during pregnancy may increase children's autism and ADHD risk. This one from Tylenol themselves.
Speaker 3: Isn't a fundamental part of being an American that we are able to express our opinions to each other without fear, without this kind of
Speaker 2: Mhmm.
Speaker 3: Horror happening? And it seems to be something we have been seeing more and more of. And it doesn't it's not even left or right. It's just people being taken out because of their beliefs. There's just no place for this kind
Speaker 4: of violence in this country. I I am heartbroken over it. I cannot believe that someone would kill another person because they were speaking their beliefs.
Speaker 0: Well, for years, you and your allies in the media have been conditioning half of the country against the president, his supporters and figures like Charlie Kirk. Trump is Hitler, his supporters are fascists, right wing extremists are danger to our democracy, they're Nazis, you know the words. Yet you seriously sit here acting surprised when lunatics who believe your words decide to take matters into their own hands. Your side burned and loot every time things don't go your way. Your side tried to assassinate the president multiple times.
Your side burned Teslas all around the country and wanted Elon dead. Your side assassinated Charlie Kirk. Your side is currently celebrating it. So don't talk to me about, Well, this is not a left and right issue. It is the left.
It's only the left. It's ironically the democratic side who engages in political violence and killings of figures they disagree with. And every time something like this happens, you come here, you tune down the rhetoric, crocodile tears, then a week later, you go right back at the dictator and fascist rhetoric again. So, you don't really care. You're just pretending.
And for that, fuck you, you, you, and you in a corner too.
Speaker 1: Sometimes the boss is a lady, sometimes they're not.
Speaker 2: Women have not been represented in corporate America, in government, and all sorts of institutions for millennia.
Speaker 1: But not president of Exactly. This
Speaker 2: You know what? I'll give you balance once we're president of The United States.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Once we have a woman president. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Well, you could also give me balance when you have women on the oil rigs, when you have women cleaning up the sewers, or doing the dangerous and dirty job of which only four to 5% is occupied by women. But you don't include those in your requirements to achieve balance, now do you? Not to mention that you preach equality all the time. Gender doesn't matter, race doesn't matter, acting like you are above it all. But then you turn around and practice identity politics and pure hypocrisy saying that balance is only achieved when we have a woman in the White House.
Now, if you want the truth, which I don't think you do because you are very delusional, not as delusional as sunny race hustler, but you're getting there. But if you want the truth, there is no such thing as balance. If someone, men or women, is smarter than someone else, they're just smarter. You can't balance that unless you push a communist style leveling, suppressing the smarter to fit your idea of fairness. Which is the root of your ideology, actually.
You are looking for forced equality. DEI, some call it. But I call it Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3: I don't understand how you are the man in charge of the nation, and
Speaker 2: you still don't understand how the First Amendment works. For me, I wanna start by thanking our loyal viewers for demanding truth and courage from us. I don't understand Right. How in this country, where the first amendment made to the constitution was to guarantee freedom of the press and freedom of speech, the government itself is using its weight and power to bully and scare people into silence.
Speaker 0: Well, you just thanked your audience for demanding truth from you. Yet, throughout this entire segment, you concealed the truth from them by not telling them why Jimmy Kimmel was fired in the first place, which is that he flat out lied about Charlie Kirk's assassin being a Trump supporter. And when you lie and frame half of the country on taxpayer funded public airwaves, obviously you will face consequences from your employer. Just like how this show had to issue hundreds of legal notices for lying to the country. Okay, so Jimmy was not silenced.
And, as you know, his show is set to return. Well, it shows just how ineffective Trump is at being a dictator and silencing the media. It's almost like he's running a democracy, which looks like you are against because you cheered Twitter actually silencing Trump's voice when they suspended his account while he was a sitting president. So did your fake victim friend Jimmy Kimmel, by the way. And you have continuously labeled free speech you don't like as disinformation and hate speech to argue for silencing people.
So you are not innocent. And frankly, I find it insulting of you to sit here and yet again bullshit the country.
Speaker 3: We will be right back.
Speaker 1: Trump posted a deep fake AI video last night that featured things senator Schumer never said and had minority leader Jeffries wearing
Speaker 4: a sombrero and a mustache. What what I find really despicable is the the resorting to racism and xenophobia, which they always seem to do. So they have Speaker Jeffries in this sombrero and this mustache trying to basically imply that the Democrats are holding out for health care for undocumented immigrants. That's what that messaging was
Speaker 1: That is supposed to so racist.
Speaker 4: And it's extremely racist. It's extremely xenophobic. It's it's a feeding sort of that xenophobia that we're we're seeing a lot in this country.
Speaker 0: So that is a meme. It's obvious that it's a meme. Sticking that huge AI generated warning on it honestly is an insult to the intelligence of your audience. But maybe you know your audience better than I do. But it's called a meme.
And the right is very good at creating political memes that effectively get a point across. In this case, health care for illegal immigrants. Now, if you find that meme racist, then this photo of you, Joy, in blackface, which is not a meme nor is it AI generated, must undeniably be racist by your own standards, no?
Speaker 1: We'll be right back.
Speaker 3: Listen. There is crime everywhere.
Speaker 1: Oh, it was it was
Speaker 5: 58 people shot in Chicago in one weekend.
Speaker 3: Okay. But, you know, if you look
Speaker 1: drinking at lattes.
Speaker 3: But the bottom line is nobody asked for you.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 3: There are people there that do this for a living.
Speaker 0: Well, if they knew how to do their job, we wouldn't be sitting here talking about it, whoop whoop. But looking at the timeline of crime in Chicago, first you and your friends in the media said, there is no crime. Now you admit that there is crime, but hey, it's everywhere. Then Elisa points out that 58 people were shot in one weekend in Chicago, which is true, and by the way, you weren't supposed to say that, you were supposed to be fake news, but I appreciate that. 58 people were shot in one weekend, yet your response is, well, no one asks for Trump's help.
And that logic says that you are okay with the killings, as long as Trump doesn't get credit for stopping them.
Speaker 3: We'll be right back. Do wanna point out that this seems to be the test that he's bragging about.
Speaker 5: Yeah. That's an example of a cognitive assessment.
Speaker 4: Uh-huh. To assess whether or not you have dementia?
Speaker 5: Snake, elephant, alligator. Nailed it. Like that. Got it.
Speaker 4: By the way, they say that toddlers have passed this with
Speaker 1: the perfect scores. This person who can tell you the difference between a camel and an elephant has the nuclear codes.
Speaker 0: Well, as ridiculous as that test looks, if you're mocking Trump for taking it, you're also mocking commercial pilots, surgeons, air traffic controllers, nuclear power plant operators, federal judges, and military generals, because that exact same test is used, in some cases required, in order to screen their cognitive fitness. Now, presidents are not required to take it. I think they should, but they're not. Trump chose to take it. It's called transparency.
It's supposed to be a good thing. Now, Joe Biden, on the other hand, was pressed, but he refused. And that is around the time when you, whoopie, said that you don't care if Joe Biden can't put a sentence together or if he poops his pants.
Speaker 9: This is scary stuff. He is going after the attorney general of the state of New York because she did her job, going after a sitting United States Senator, going after the head former head of the FBI. That is not what America is about. We disagree with each other. That's fine.
But we don't throw our opponents in jail.
Speaker 0: Well, I don't know about that because no one is above the law. Sounds familiar. Right? No one is above the law. Right over here, Senator.
That was the line that your party bombarded us with while they went after President Trump and other Republicans for four years under Joe Biden. I didn't hear you say we don't put our opponents in jail back then. In fact, everyone at this table was sharing it. And I would have respected you if you were at least consistent here. But good news, I believe in second chances.
So, look at the camera and say no one is above the law. Go ahead.
Speaker 4: Look, Mam Donnie played him like a New Yorker would play anybody. That's that's the bottom line. New Yorkers were a special breed of people. Okay? I'm from The Bronx.
He's he lived in Queens. And so I I really do think that Mondani did spoke his language. He talked about housing. He talked about building housing. Affordability.
Trump wants a piece of the New York housing business. This was about business. Mandani, we got to give it to him. He played it like a politician.
Speaker 0: Okay, so you are admiring Mandani's diplomacy. A politician doing the politician talk. I get that. However, something very interesting is happening here. When Trump called Putin smart, Kim Jong Un very talented, or President Shai a brilliant guy while negotiating with them, you know, diplomacy, this show went ballistic.
The theme of Trump praises dictators was your favorite talking point on this show. You still bring it up. Joy, you said it's disturbing that Trump cozies up with dictators. Remember that? Yet, today, you're applauding Mendani for cozying up to the same Trump that you call a fascist dictator.
But suddenly, it's smart. He played it like a politician. I don't hear you say Mendani praised a fascist. And that double standard right there leaves you exactly with three options: one. You accept diplomacy only when it's done by your side.
Or two, Trump isn't actually the fascist dictator you spend years calling him because if he was, Mamdani just kissed up to a fascist and you're applauding it. Or three, Trump is a fascist and you're totally fine with it as long as the person doing the kissing is a Democrat. So, which one is it?
Speaker 4: -As a mother of black children, I know that black boys are not given the presumption of innocence and the presumption of youth. She's calling the police and saying they're trying to steal their car, they're 11 years old. They don't know how to drive. And so for me, what was interesting was I have had to be in the position where I have gone to my local police department because I know my son is going to be training for the Junior Olympics running around the neighborhood in an all white neighborhood. And I have brought him to the police and said, he belongs to me.
This is my son. Do not harass him. Do not stop him.
Speaker 0: Wait a minute, Sonny. Why do you live in an all white neighborhood? You're always so passionate about calling out systematic racism and defending black communities especially when black crime stats come up. You call white people racist. Yet, at the same time, you have chosen to live in an all white neighbourhood.
So I'm curious, is it because you don't want to support black neighborhoods or you just don't feel safe in a black neighborhood?
Speaker 3: We'll be right back. The supreme court just turned down the request to consider overturning same sex marriage. They said no. We're not we're not doing that. We're not going there.
So thank you supreme court. You know, sometimes I say this to you guys all the time. Sometimes they do stuff I love, and sometimes they annoy the hell out
Speaker 1: of me. And congratulations.
Speaker 2: Having this conversation in 2025 blows my
Speaker 3: -It is insane.
Speaker 0: -Well, the reason these conversations are still alive is because common sense is still alive. Look, marriage is a religious institution. In the Christian worldview, which shaped the entire West, it is a patriarchal, God ordained covenant between a man and a woman oriented toward procreation, family, and societal order. Now, we decided to undermine this entire framework and redefine it for same sex unions, a symptom of feminism by the way, a symptom of secular humanism and cultural suicide that erodes the nuclear family and Christian ethics. Which, by the way, has taken us into this slippery slope of moral relevatism like transgenderism, prostitution, and sex outside wedlock.
Now, with that being said, the reason people push for marriage is ultimately for government benefits. And that's why I don't think the government should be in the business of marriage at all because they have hijacked a religious institution and turned it into a welfare program. If you made it this far, thanks for watching. And by the way, this is my commentary channel, Damon Imani IRL. You can subscribe if you're interested.
I'll put the link in the descriptions below. I'll see you in the New Year. And again, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
@damonimani - Damon Imani
Reality checking the crazies on The View for 16 minutes straight! Sit back and enjoy! https://t.co/vmbll1xk0e
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss various topics, including aging, immigration, politics, and health. One speaker expresses a desire to age naturally, while another questions this stance given the speaker's dyed hair and makeup.
The conversation shifts to immigration, with claims made about deportation numbers under different presidents and accusations of distorted facts. A photoshopped image is mentioned, and the use of AI-generated images by political figures is criticized.
The discussion touches on personal ancestry, including slave ownership by ancestors and calls for reparations. The rising obesity rates are debated, with differing views on the role of personal choices versus brain function and the use of drugs for weight loss.
The speakers also address concerns about cognitive decline in political leaders, with accusations of cherry-picked principles and media bias. The topic of white genocide conspiracy theories in South Africa is raised, along with controversial songs and land claims. Finally, the speakers discuss the lack of women in late-night talk shows and the reasons behind it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't want to have Botox. I don't want to have filler. I don't want to have a facelift. I'm enjoying my gray hairs.
Speaker 1: Woah. Jamila, you are sitting here with dyed hair and a pound of makeup on your face preaching about being natural. That's silly. No?
Speaker 2: Do wanna point out something that he came in and Obama left him quite well off. Left the nation well off. And Biden also Yeah. Left the country very well off. See, the folks got to remember, you know, we are very fickle in this country.
We forget we forget, you know, you can be mad at one side or the other, but you have to stick with facts. And the facts are he left we left good stuff. He has pooped on it. Right. He has now taken us to a place where people are just being removed.
Speaker 1: Illegals. Whoopi. When you say people are being removed, they are illegal immigrants and they are being deported. But about the timeline you just provided on the estate of immigrants under the last three presidents. Yes, Obama left him well off.
He deported more illegals than Trump, and I don't think we're supposed to mention that. But the same trend continued under Trump's first term, and then Biden got in. He got in, opened the borders, and we saw the highest number of border crossings in US history under his watch. And now, Trump is cleaning that up. That is the actual timeline whoop whoop, okay?
So, I find it ironic when you say, we forget what happened, and we need to stick with the facts, while at the same time, you rely on selective memory and you distort the facts.
Speaker 2: That image of a tattoo reading MS 13 was photoshopped. Obviously photoshopped. And and it's done it is
Speaker 3: quite He was not briefed that that is not a real image and that it was photoshopped.
Speaker 4: No. Yeah. He doesn't even recognize his own fake images at this point.
Speaker 1: Joy, Vulcan. No one has said that it's not photoshopped. The MS 13 text was added as a translation of the actual tattoo symbols right below it.
Speaker 5: Him tweeting out an AI created image and the White House official account of him posing as the pope is disrespectful, it is frankly disgusting, and it is outrageous. And so all of those devout Catholics that voted for Donald Trump, I think you need to ask yourself some questions, and I think you need to ask the the White House and and Donald Trump some questions because Trump, mister president, it's it's his holiness, the pope, not his oiliness, the dope.
Speaker 1: And you're a sanctimonious joke. But look, the bigger picture is right here in my pocket, and I will pull it out. This is Rihanna dressed as a pope. Olympics twenty twenty four, mocking Jesus Christ's last meal. Over here, camera.
Over here. Don't run. Don't run because Trombonely posted a meme. But these are actual photos and I don't see that same energy of yours, Anna, when it comes to Hollywood actually mocking God. This is Madonna on a cross as Jesus Christ.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back.
Speaker 6: I did Finding Your Roots as a lot of people know.
Speaker 4: I did too.
Speaker 6: Yeah. And I found out some some things
Speaker 4: They found brunette by the way.
Speaker 6: Yeah. They did. They did. They did. And a part that we did not air is that my father found out that the man he thought was his father was not his biological father.
Speaker 4: But when did he find out?
Speaker 6: He found out during the taping. He was there with
Speaker 1: Well, just for the record, Sunny, you also found out that your ancestors owned the slaves. And I believe you talked about it on the show at some point, but I wasn't here. So now that we are all here, you have constantly argued that white people today should pay reparations for slavery even though they had no part in it and that many of their ancestors never owned the slaves. But now, we know that your ancestors owned the slaves, so speaking your language and holding your own standards, you have a net worth of $6,000,000. And if you spend only 1% of it for reparations, which would be $60,000, you can pay thousand bucks to 60 black people each.
And although thousand bucks is not a lot of money, I think it's enough for you to be a role model of what you preach, so I think now would be the perfect time. I can already see black people in the audience. So go ahead. Pay your reparations. I'm sure they take PayPal or Venmo.
Speaker 2: If we know these drugs work well, if we know they're going to help people get to where they need to be in order to do to eat better, to move better, why wouldn't they be available for everyone? Because they keep saying we wanna make America healthy again. But then you put stuff out of reach of people Yeah. And you make it impossible. Why?
Why? Why?
Speaker 4: Think it's life choices. They think that being heavy, being overweight is because you eat too much. The new research is showing that it has to do with your brain. And and this particular drug changes your something in your brain so that you don't wanna eat the whole pizza.
Speaker 1: Well, I see it differently. Look, in the sixties, around thirteen percent of US adults were obese. Now it's at forty two percent. Of course, due to poorer diet and less activity, and those are life choices. But when we have these conversations, for some reason we don't want to talk about that.
I don't know, maybe it's offensive or my body, my choice or whatever, but just give me the drugs. Don't tell me not to go full whoopee on that pizza. Just give me the drugs, and that right there just doesn't sit right with me, and we don't even know the long term effects of these drugs. So, I think we should look at our problems in the mirror in the mirror, whoopie and try to deal with them without the drugs.
Speaker 7: I I would I would offer specific evidence if we had time exactly what I got done when I was supposedly lost my cognitive capability.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. You mean what the AutoPen controlled by others in the White House got done when you lost your cognitive capability, but go ahead.
Speaker 7: You know, one of the things that that well, I shouldn't say anyway, I shouldn't get I can be short.
Speaker 1: No. Go ahead. We we have time.
Speaker 7: I'm actually interviewing for a job as a cameraman.
Speaker 1: Okay. Good luck with that. How do you lead the
Speaker 7: world without having the best infrastructure? How do lead the world without having the best health care in the world? How do you lead the world without having the best education system?
Speaker 2: Yeah. Did you
Speaker 1: get any of that?
Speaker 7: Anyway.
Speaker 2: That was great. We wanna take a break. What
Speaker 6: is crazy to me is that you are the only female late night talk show host.
Speaker 8: Wow. Yeah. Well, I was saying earlier, I'm like, this is the dumbest glass ceiling of all time, but like, I'm happy to be there. But also, guys, what's happening? Oh
Speaker 4: my god.
Speaker 8: Yeah. And I just feel like the moment has we've moved past it. We gotta get some ladies in more ladies in late night.
Speaker 1: Well, Busy, first of all, good luck with your new show. I'm not sure how it's doing since there's no reported metrics probably because the audience is too small to register on industry radar. But it's not a glass ceiling. It's a viewership floor. Nobody's blocking women from hosting late night, just like nobody is stopping WNBA.
The talent is there, but the ratings have left the chat. So if woman led shows pulled good numbers, they would be everywhere. But it doesn't, which is why your last show was canceled after six months due to low ratings.
Speaker 2: You know who issued an executive order aimed at lowering drug drug costs. He didn't specify which drugs he's gonna target or which insurance programs would be impacted. It doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 1: Well, let me just go back. Bringing down the price of drugs is an issue that even Democrats, your side, have been running on for years. Meaning Republicans, Democrats, everyone in the country, including every single one of you in your audience, you want this. And the fact that even when a Trump policy directly benefits you, you cry about it, you condemn it, well, it doesn't make any sense. Out of sheer hatred for the man, it's utterly astonishing, to be honest with you, and I think it should be studied by psychologists, because this, this is a mental issue.
Speaker 2: We'll be right.
Speaker 0: Men's aging faces are considered dignified and sexy and they have salt and pepper hair. When do you ever hear women described as having salt and pepper hair?
Speaker 4: What? Women can do whatever they want to make themselves look better. What's wrong
Speaker 5: with that?
Speaker 0: There's a culture in thinking that that's what looks better specifically on women. Shoot men in high definition and we we make women airbrush like emojis. And so I don't like that. I don't wanna have Botox. I don't wanna have filler.
I don't wanna have a facelift. I'm enjoying my gray hairs.
Speaker 1: Woah, Gemila, you are sitting here with dyed hair and a pound of makeup on your face preaching about being natural. That's silly, no?
Speaker 2: And my other question is, why is this important to know now? We got a lot of stuff to be concerned about at the moment.
Speaker 4: When when is Jake Tapper gonna write a book about the cognitive decline of the person who is in
Speaker 3: charge right Okay,
Speaker 1: so Joy, when you do the but the other guy thing, you need to at least have a legitimate point just so you don't sound ridiculous. Trump is cognitively sharper than everyone at this table combined. And trust me, my presence here is the only thing pulling out the average. But your question would be: Why is this important now? Well, you and your side keep screaming, no one elected Elon Musk, which is a ridiculous thing to say, since the president Trump put him in charge of cutting wasteful spending, but even if we take your no one elected Elon Musk serious, you're basically saying that you care about democracy.
You don't want people who are not elected to run the country, which I understand and I agree with. But if you're consistent with your logic, then you should also have a problem with the reality of Biden's handlers, including an auto pen, not elected by the people of this country, running the country while Joe Biden was checked out. But you don't have a problem with that. You say it's not important. So, either you are fine with unelected handlers running the country as long as they are on your side, or the more likely option is that you're cherry picking your principles to fit your narrative, which is why your credibility has been declining way faster than Biden's cognition.
Speaker 2: South African President, Rabbi Posa, paid a visit to the White House yesterday, which turned into a surprise presentation on conspiracy theories
Speaker 8: of
Speaker 2: a white genocide in his country. There is crime, as there is all over the world, but it is not about killing off white people. This is just straight up
Speaker 3: bull. Well,
Speaker 1: Wilpy, I find it interesting that you and your producer cut out the clips that Trump showed to South Africa's President, but it's your lucky day. I've got a couple of my own. You always make me pull it out. You know that. Right?
But that's okay. So let's take a look here. Kill the boa, kill the farmer. And weirdly, 90% of the farmers in South Africa are white. So tell me what that means.
And, by the way, I wonder what will happen if a group of people in US sings something like that about certain group of people in US. But this is the current president in South Africa, the one that just met with Trump. I wonder whose land whose land should Stop. I wonder whose land he's talking about that he wants to take without compensation. But again, that's that's for you to find out about.
Speaker 2: We'll be right back.
Speaker 3: 77% of Americans in 2023 said Joe Biden was too old to run again. And they were told, sit down, shut up, he is the nominee. And then when it became untenable and he stepped aside
Speaker 1: Wait, Alicia, when Americans were watching Joe barely being able to walk and put a sentence together, every single one of you at this table were telling them not to believe what they can see and what they can hear. You and your friends in the media constantly rejected those concerns as disinformation and cheapfakes. Remember that one, Joy? Cherry picked clips to mislead the people? You said that.
Sonny, you even said those concerns were rooted in ageism. Just like how you connect everything to sexism and racism. You're a race hustler. You know that. Right?
So when you say Americans who noticed his decline were told to sit down and shut up, just for the record, you too were doing the telling.
@damonimani - Damon Imani
Demolishing The View’s Fake News vendors for 12 minutes straight. Sit back and enjoy! https://t.co/LizDcaIJjv
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm offended by liberals who condescendingly label me, an immigrant, as oppressed. I have the same opportunities as everyone else. We should celebrate White History Month, highlighting white people's contributions to the industrial revolution, science, and technology.
It's absurd to criticize someone for feeding their birds of prey their natural diet, especially when taxpayer dollars fund questionable projects like bat research in Wuhan and transgender operas. Don't forget USAID advances national security works to protect human rights and improve global health. It's hypocritical to advocate for climate action while opposing Tesla, a leader in reducing emissions.
Many on the left are fake and Democrats are on a script all the time. Trump is real.
Zelenskyy has shut down media outlets, jailed journalists, and banned opposition parties; actions befitting a dictator. Trump hasn't been in office long enough to fix Biden's inflation. I challenge anyone to name one constitutional right that Trump has taken away.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm an immigrant. I am not oppressed, Sonny. I have the same opportunities as everyone else, and I'm absolutely offended by condescending liberals like you telling me that I am a victim victim and that I'm oppressed.
Speaker 1: February is still black history month. And when it's Native American history month or it's Chicano or Latino history month, we're gonna celebrate those too. I think I think
Speaker 0: we should celebrate white history month too. I mean, the industrial revolution, much of modern science, technology and infrastructure, all of it were pioneered by white people, not to mention the best countries on the planet being white countries. So I think we should celebrate White History Month, and obviously it should be July. Summer is in full swing, the barbecue is crackling with juicier steaks. Okay?
The lemonade so cold, is practically sweating, and the sweetest smell oh, the sweetest smell of freshly cut grass, all of that just screams white.
Speaker 2: She goes on to talk about how he puts animals in blenders to feed his birds of prey. Baby chicks and
Speaker 3: mice.
Speaker 2: The point here is think about the mentality of what it takes to physically do what you're asking that person to do and stop. There are stories about people that kill animals, and what you need to lack to be able to do that. This man seems dangerous.
Speaker 0: Well, Sara, experiments funded by a very good friend of this show, Doctor. Fauci, locked puppies inside cages with their head in boxes filled with sandflies, eating their faces alive. Now, dad is a dangerous man, I would say a cycle, but he's a friend of yours. Okay? Not someone who feeds their birds of prey their natural diet.
So clearly, you don't have any idea how feeding a predatory animal or the food chain in general works because you live inside a Disney La la Land where Simba has gone vegan. And I would say, thank God that you don't have any birds of prey because if you did, they would be dead from hunger by now. Well, Elon, I'm a little worried particularly with this USAID stuff.
Speaker 1: And let's not forget, USAID advances national security works to protect human rights and improve global health. So why they're going after that?
Speaker 0: Well, let me let me first Bill, frankly, I think you should rather be worried about the Epstein client list. Okay? So your question will be, why are they going after USAID? How about a pull up a list? This one is not as famous as the list that you're familiar with, but this is a list of the taxpayer funded USAID projects.
$6,000,000 to fund tourism in Egypt, Eight Million Dollars to political, a propaganda arm of the Democratic Party just like this show. $47,000 for transgender opera in Colombia. What is that about? $2,000,000 for sex changes in Guatemala. You will love this one, Bill.
One million dollar for bat research in Wuhan, China. 20 Million Dollars on a new Sesame Street show in Iraq, like it's US taxpayers responsibility to bring fucking Cooking Monster to Iraq
Speaker 1: And we're gonna go to break.
Speaker 4: And the other thing I'll say is, the engineering dog team, under Elon Musk, they age They range in age from 19 to 25. Yeah. And they are the ones that have the access to our most serious sensitive information and they have no real work experience. What happened to meritocracy?
Speaker 0: Well, Sunny, all government agencies, IRS, DOJ, DOD, DHS, all of them have always had access to our sensitive information. Now, over 3,500,000 people work across all of these agencies. And if you do the math and filter that number down right over here, Rupi, if you filter that number down to employees with access to our sensitive information, you're looking at about 450,000 people. But you're only upset at a handful of them just because they work for Elon Musk. So I don't know if you're going to air this because you just embarrassed yourself.
Speaker 4: It it angers me when people are like, this woke stuff has gotta go. That's telling me that you don't care about my lived experience, you don't care about the oppression of the LGBTQ community, you don't care about the oppression of the disabled, you don't care about the oppression of immigrants, you don't care about your fellow neighbor and that is ungodly, that is not Christian.
Speaker 5: Well, yeah. But they you know what the the most ironic thing is? They don't care about it and they don't care about it while wearing big fat crosses around their Yes.
Speaker 1: Well Wait.
Speaker 0: I've gotta I've gotta step in here. Sonny, about your lived experience. You're doing better than over 99% of the country. You're not oppressed, and no one is oppressing the disabled. They are oppressed by their disability, And with LGBT, well, taking over every corporation, running the culture with an entire month in your name, and turning every criticism into a hate crime is not exactly oppression.
It's called a privilege that others do not have. And with immigrants, I'm an immigrant. I am not oppressed, Sonny. I have the same opportunities as everyone else, and I'm absolutely offended by condescending liberals like you telling me that I am a victim and that I'm oppressed. And all of this cuts right into the core of your wokeness, creating righteousness and virtue signaling to look good while shutting down everyone who doesn't bow to a narrative, like calling Christians ungodly for not being woke.
By the way, try saying that to Muslims who are not woke either, and you will quickly realize just how kind Christians have been to you.
Speaker 5: Have to grab what you that you need a candidate who's like Trump on the left. Somebody who speaks the vernacular. He comes out there and he's he might as well say, oh, I got a hemorrhoid today. And and people like it because it's real.
Speaker 0: Well, you said it, Joy. Trump is real. And I don't think you were supposed to say that, but it's true. The modern left and the Democrats, are the fakest people in politics, on a script all the time. They put on nice faces.
They say all the nice words, yet completely untouched with reality, and people notice that. No one likes fakery, okay? Not to mention that fake moral high ground from your people. Like, Sonny, you scream cultural appropriation all the time, yet here you are. I'll look at you.
I say congratulation with your new hairstyle. It looks good on you, but you straightened it, and you colored it blonde. That's still in white people's culture.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. This whole all of this, you did it money cutting all this stuff. I'm sorry. The United States government made a deal with Elon Musk for those cars of his. And it what was the price?
$400,000,000. 4 hundred million dollars. Cut out.
Speaker 0: Well, Wookie, the deal that you're talking about was made by Joe Biden with Tesla and Trump just canceled it by the way. So if there's any questions of conflict of interest, there you have your answer. But in general, the US government pays numerous companies like Boeing, Lockheed, Tesla, and many others, but to innovate, create jobs, and grow the economy, and to cut emission. Okay? We will get back to that.
But Doja, on the other hand, is just cutting wasteful spending and exposing government corruption. Big difference there, whoop whoop. And I gotta say, it's quite telling that everyone on this panel constantly advocate for climate action, and you cheer for government use of your tax dollars to cut emissions, yet you oppose Tesla, the world's leader in reducing vehicle emission, receiving these funds, meaning you're willing to let the planet get destroyed because you don't like the guy who's trying to save it, or you don't actually believe in climate change. So which one is it?
Speaker 3: As a fact check, America does not have a king. Donald Trump is not a king. Ukraine is not run by a dictator, it is run by the duly elected president Zelenskyy.
Speaker 5: Did not invade themselves, by
Speaker 3: the way. Invade themselves and has a 57% approval rating with his own people.
Speaker 0: Wait. Alicia, let's let's just examine Zelenskyy not being a dictator in that fact check of yours. I'll even grant you the argument that he's not holding elections because his country is under martial law. Okay. But aside from not holding elections, Zelenskyy has shut down every single media outlet that is not a state run.
Okay? He has jailed multiple journalists and he has banned all opposition parties. Now, all of those actions spell out one word. What's that word, Alicia? Just let it out, Alicia.
Go ahead.
Speaker 5: A lot of these people, in my opinion, have been misled. They thought that grocery prices would come down. They're up. They thought inflation was coming down. It's up.
Speaker 0: Well, Joy, Trump has been in office for what? A month? And if you had any clue about how the economy works, which you clearly don't, but I gotta say, I give you credit for embarrassing yourself anyway, you would realize that it takes way longer than that to bring down the Biden inflation. And that's because Trump does not have a magic wand like the one that you people use to change genders.
Speaker 6: And unfortunately, we see that ever since day one, baby, that pen been going and it ain't stopped and it's steamrolling over all of our rights and our liberties and our freedoms and everything that we thought was the foundation of this country, our constitution.
Speaker 4: Yes.
Speaker 6: Seems like we're saying, well, nope. With a get rid of the constitution. With a pen, get rid of impoundment and other laws that exist.
Speaker 0: Well, Jasmine, I can you give me one example of something in the constitution that Trump has gotten rid of or a right that he has taken away from you? Just one example. Anyone?
@damonimani - Damon Imani
I don't think Adam Schiff and Joy Reid appreciated my thoughts on the consequences of Trump remaining on the ballot: https://t.co/1IVf14pk3a
Video Transcript AI Summary
If the court rules that someone who incited an insurrection to stay in office can remain on the ballot, what consequences will our country face? What if they decide he can stage a coup and then run again?
The consequences will be that the voice of the people will be heard, and they get to choose their president. Also, on election night, when he wins, people will get to watch certain individuals cry on air.
Thank you for your time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you think would be the consequences for our country if this court rules that somebody who egged on an insurrection that was an insurrection for him to remain in office remains on the ballot? If they rule that he can stage a coup and then run again, what do you think the consequences of that will be?
Speaker 1: Well, the consequences will be that firstly, of course, the voice of the people will be heard and they get to choose their president. And secondly, on the night of election, if or probably when he wins, people will get to watch you and lying chef here cry life on air like the little bitches you are.
Speaker 0: Congressman Adam Schiff, thank you for your time. Much appreciate it.
@damonimani - Damon Imani
Denmark is preparing to alter its electoral system to silence Elon Musk's impact on politics: https://t.co/1TwCpBXDRY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Denmark is amending its electoral law to limit foreign influence in its politics, specifically targeting Elon Musk's commentary on Danish political matters. This bipartisan decision follows Musk's public support for Germany's AfD party and his highlighting of reports critical of the German government, which were suppressed by the largely state-owned media. The Danish government frames this change as necessary to protect its democracy from foreign interference, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding its decision-making processes. The move comes amidst concerns about the left-leaning bias of much of Denmark's own media, which are largely government-owned or subsidized. This action is seen as a way to counter what is considered a threat to their established narrative.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Denmark is about to change its electoral law to curb foreign influence from powerful foreigners, specifically because of Elon Musk. Almost all of the parties across the political aisle, left, right, middle, all of them have agreed to amend the electoral act showing various strong unity, to be honest with you, since they're all essentially socialists. Now the announcement came after Elon Musk expressed his support for the party alternative for Germany or AfD by posting about it on x, having a chat with the leader of the party, and by highlighting reports from independent journalists about Germany that the German media, most of which are state owned, tried to suppress. So basically, Denmark wants to somehow prohibit Elon Musk from potentially posting about Danish politics. And since, like Germany, most of the Danish media leans left and are either government owned or receive some sort of government support, Elon Musk's platform, more than his influence, is a serious threat to their narrative.
And they are packing it under in a troubled world, it's more important than ever to protect the Danish government. We must protect our democracy from foreign influence in our choices and decision making processes locally and nationally. Nothing screams protecting our democracy like trying to shut up voices no matter how many miles away from commenting on your democracy. Unless, of course, it's I don't know, Klaus Schwab or George Soros funded the Open Society Foundations shaping the democracy in Europe. That that right there, we are okay with that.
@damonimani - Damon Imani
There is a case. Trump should proclaim July as White History Month.
@damonimani - Damon Imani
I can’t imagine the Google employee who had to edit the name *not punching the air right after hitting 'save changes'.
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm thrilled to share that my recent appearance on 'The View' has outperformed their official channel's metrics, despite my smaller following and the shorter time my video has been available. It's surprising to see how a simple setup can compete with a multimillion-dollar production. I suggest The View consider consulting with DOGE to streamline their budget, which might help them achieve a more efficient failure!
@damonimani - Damon Imani
I'm happy to report my appearance on 'The View,' exposing Whoopi Goldberg and Bill Gates' cover up of USAID's fraud, has surpassed the official channel's numbers across all metrics (again!), despite my 90K vs. their 1.4M subscribers and my video being up for only 1 day vs. their 3 days. I understand that it’s tough to have a multimillion-dollar production budget and still get surpassed by a dude on his laptop who can barely speak English. So to help, I'd advise The View to consult with DOGE on cutting its production budget, making their failing show at least fail with some efficiency!
@damonimani - Damon Imani
Taking down The Fake News media for 9 minutes straight. Sit back and enjoy! https://t.co/LrOnRWTTWn
Video Transcript AI Summary
Where are the fact checkers on MSNBC? Trump promised to remove illegal immigrants to create jobs for Americans, but now it's clear that this was misleading. RFK Jr. has been misrepresented regarding vaccines and fluoride; such claims are unfounded. Discussions about gender roles show hypocrisy when praising men for chores while criticizing them for traditional roles. California's issues are misattributed to "woke politics," ignoring the complexities of land and resource management. Affirmative action has benefited women, but DEI initiatives can lead to hiring based on identity rather than qualifications. Ultimately, the focus should be on hiring the most qualified candidates, regardless of race or gender.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And where are the fact checkers on MSNBC? Maybe maybe I should host this show. Who knows? You know what? I'm kidding.
I will never work for the children of life. But
Speaker 1: Trump ran on, let's get all the immigrants out of the country so that Americans can get rid of jobs. And now they're saying, oh, sorry. You can't do the job. The lie was that we're gonna get rid of the immigrants so that you will have more jobs.
Speaker 2: The immigrants. And now
Speaker 1: they're saying, you can't let them more immigrants.
Speaker 0: Choice. We've been through this before. He wants to get rid of the illegal immigrants who are taking people's jobs. But since you keep misrepresenting these statements, I'm gonna have to ask you, can you tell me the difference between legal and illegal immigrants? Let's go.
I'm not sure. Say what? Let's let's just finish this.
Speaker 1: We'll be right.
Speaker 0: Why are
Speaker 3: we giving RFK Jr a pass? Okay. He wants to ban pharmaceutical advertising. That's nice. He also wants to kill our kids by withdrawing vaccines from our schools and taking fluoride out of our drinking water.
I mean, Democrats have to fight these nominees. And and Chris.
Speaker 0: Chris. RFK junior has never said he wants to withdraw vaccines from schools. You just made that up. And if removing fluoride from water kills people, then 97% of European population should be extinct by now since 45 out of 50 countries in Europe do not put fluoride in their water. So, obviously, not only do you not know what you're talking about, but to fabricate these lies, life on air.
And where are the fact checkers on MSNBC? Maybe maybe I should host this show. Who knows? You know what? I'm kidding.
I will never work for the children of lies. But to make up these lies, to suggest that RFK Jr wants to kill the Americans' children is outright vile. Obvious.
Speaker 3: No. And senator Chris Murphy, thank you very much.
Speaker 2: But I love the fact that, you know, Manny is younger, and it's very helpful that he's handy. And when we travel, I'm not picking up any bags. He's the one that's hefting them over overhead.
Speaker 1: He throws
Speaker 2: the garbage out. He does the heavy stuff.
Speaker 0: Well, right, Sunny. But plenty of times, every single one of you on this show slammed men and called them misogynists for saying that they prefer women who clean, cook, and take care of the children. Yet now you just praised some of men's duties, like picking up your bags and taking out the trash. So to me, it sounds like you have no issues with gender roles when it benefits you.
Speaker 2: He said that California's woke politics and DEI are the reasons for the fires because Newsom has been tearing down dams because Native Americans wanted some of the river back. I'm sorry. This stolen land, first of all. Okay? California stolen land.
2nd of all, that's part of what always happens. These dams, there's preservation of the dam. So that was just complete, not only misinformation, but it was racist.
Speaker 0: Well, Sunny, you find it racist because you look at it through your race hustling lens without which you would be as ineffective as Newsome's choice to save the infamous Delta smell fish over the people of California. And literally, one sentence after calling the dams demolition misinformation, you confirmed that Newsom did in fact knock them down. And I don't think you were supposed to say that.
Speaker 2: We've had people like Dolly Parton, and I think you asked her only feminist? Are you a feminist? And she said She
Speaker 1: said, I don't think so.
Speaker 2: Think so. But then you pushed her, and she said, yeah. I guess I am.
Speaker 1: Well, I said to her, Do you believe that women should make the same amount of money as men? Well, I guess I am a feminist. Yeah.
Speaker 2: And she said, I guess I am a feminist. So I I
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. But doing the same job, women do earn the same as men. It's illegal for companies not to pay equal wages for equal work. But since Logic always take a back seat on this show, will be, you're looking at the uncontrolled pay gap, which does not take into account things like, I don't know, women often take pregnancy leave. Women opt for part time work more frequently.
Women negotiate less aggressively for salary increases. And women take more time off for personal travel and other family responsibilities. And when you analyze these factors, you find out that for the same work, under same conditions, pay is equal by law. So I wish you were as right as your confidence implies.
Speaker 1: They need to they need to start shelling their money out. These guys, Bezos and, but they said, Musk, do they think that they're gonna live forever, these people? You know, everybody dies. According to the World Food Programme, we could end world hunger by 2030 with $40,000,000,000, and nothing is done with that money to help people. It's just to increase their power.
Speaker 0: Well, Joy, your net worth should not be over $30,000,000 if you were doing anything with your money to help people. So I think you're going to sit this one out.
Speaker 1: Is this the immigration system fix that people had in mind when they voted, do you think?
Speaker 2: I think there's a very clear message as to what this president wants the look of a criminal migrant to look like, and I think that's racist.
Speaker 1: Let me also say
Speaker 0: But but wait a minute, Sunny. Most criminal immigrants look the way they look. They are brown because they come from regions closer to the equator where UV radiation is higher. Therefore, they have more melanin, which makes the skin darker. So I know this is surprising to you, but Trump did not do that.
Nature and genetics did. They are the true racists.
Speaker 1: This is not a normal inauguration. No. This is not a normal person. Why do they go as if this is a normal inauguration? It should.
Let me let me say this. The Germans voted also.
Speaker 0: Okay. Here we go again with the Hitler thing. Joy, the Germans also drank water. Okay? But for someone who preaches a lot about democracy on this show, that's what you do, you sure sound like an election denier.
I don't know. And I think the only reason this is not a normal inauguration to you is because, just like Ben here, whose last hit was so long ago that he literally came out wishing he was black to score political points with Kamala, you are both just out of touch with what Americans voted for.
Speaker 4: If if you opposed and stood up against Trump in 2017, but you were there now, if you spoke up against Trump January 7, 2021, but you were there now applauding him like a trained seal, Donald Trump has not changed. You've changed.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, I agree with you, actually. Trump did not change, people did. And they changed after they stopped watching and getting their news from the corporate activist media, such as yours, a table of very unstable people, by the way, which has been acting as the hand of the Democrat establishment to vilify and demonize Trump, by all means. So I would say that's a change for good.
Won't you?
Speaker 2: Women were really the the most, they gained the most advantages from from from affirmative action. And so this is a war on women. I think it's, a war on people of color. And so what we're seeing is an attack, not on necessarily DEI or wokeness. We're seeing an attack on the very fabric of our company, which is opportunity for all, including women.
Speaker 0: Well, Sunny, women have the opportunity if they have better qualifications than others applying for a given job. But the DEI tells companies not to aim for the best and the most qualified applicant, instead to hire based on the right skin color, the perfect pronoun, and the trendiest gender identity just so they can check all the boxes under diversity form. And by doing that, they are discriminating against those who are more qualified. I mean, you are the perfect example of this Sunny. You are a lawyer, yet most of the time you have no idea what you're talking about.
So I would never hire you. And that would not be because you're black or you're a woman, but because again, you have no idea what you're talking about.
@damonimani - Damon Imani
Update https://t.co/kghEGvGEeS
Video Transcript AI Summary
There have been misunderstandings regarding my recent video. Some viewers believe there's a shadow of someone holding a gun behind me, but that's just poor video quality. I'm fine and not reading from a script. I can move around freely and I'm doing well. I simply want James O'Keefe to apologize to Black.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, everyone. There's been some misunderstandings around the video that I posted yesterday. Some people are pointing out that there is a shadow of someone holding a gun behind me on the wall. That's not the case. It was just a bad video quality, and I am fine.
I'm I'm I'm not reading from a script. And as you see, I okay. I can go around. I am I am free. I'm doing good.
I just I just want James O'Keefe to apologize to Black
@damonimani - Damon Imani
Taking down the fake news media for 55 minutes straight! (2024 highlights) https://t.co/v1DcB1rwIW
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2024, I've engaged with a group sharing extreme views, compiling 50 clips showcasing their most outrageous claims and my responses. The term "woke" has been misused, and caving to its critics only empowers them. Elon Musk is accused of spreading misinformation, yet critics fail to provide evidence. Discussions on abortion highlight the complexities of personal choice versus responsibility. Claims of racism and misogyny in politics are challenged, pointing out hypocrisy in those who benefit from the system. The media's bias is evident, as they label dissenting voices as misinformation while ignoring their own inaccuracies. Ultimately, the conversation reflects deep divisions in society, with calls for accountability and honesty in political discourse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2024, I have subjected myself over 200 times to the company of a particular group of very deranged people whose takes encapsulate every hoax, false narrative and just pure fake news from the leftist stream media. So I put together an hour of 50 clips that basically highlights the top unhinged and out of touch takes from these people, along with my responses to them. So, Merry Christmas, Happy New Year when you get there, and enjoy.
Speaker 1: But it struck me that in in the first segment, you used the term woke, and you said that woke is what was sort of ruining everything. And I I just the term woke has been, in my view, weaponized and bastardized. And, so I was surprised to hear you use the term because historically, woke is a word used by the black community to note that we must be aware of social injustices.
Speaker 2: I'll use any term you want Okay. Because maybe that is a word that's triggering, and so we let's not use that word. I don't know.
Speaker 0: Wait a minute, Bill. You cannot let these people dictate what terms you are allowed to use because as soon as you cave to these people, they will want even more. And that's the result of the woke mind virus. It is a virus. It makes people sick.
Okay? Now, by making this about black people and racism, Sunny, who not only has the virus but is also a well known race hustler, that's what you are, she made you censor yourself. This means you took orders from a virus and as the liberal which you are, that is why your ideology is being replaced by the virus. And that's because you are weak.
Speaker 3: Elon has just taken the media out of the way, and he has no middle man. He's directly feeding disinformation to the masses.
Speaker 4: His conspiracy theories are transparently laughable.
Speaker 5: I am scared by Elon Musk. I think that he's spreading misinformation. I think that it's dangerous, and I think we don't have the mechanisms of control in government.
Speaker 6: He is now regularly spreading false information about the election, about VP Harris. How concerned should we be of his influence and his potential impact?
Speaker 0: Well, Stephanie, I've been listening to you and your activist guests for over 5 minutes now accusing Elon Musk of spreading misinformation without providing any specific examples or evidence to back those claims. So I would say right here and right now, you are the ones that's spreading actual misinformation, but we are on MSNBC so that is to be expected.
Speaker 7: They are your religious beliefs, and I stand by your right to believe what you want. I don't know why you are not willing to allow me to take care of my body.
Speaker 8: Why do you why are you
Speaker 7: so obsessed with what I do with my body?
Speaker 0: Well, okay. If no one should have a say in your decision to get an abortion, then if the man that you slept with wants you to get an abortion, but you decide to keep it, then he shouldn't be forced to pay child support. Are you okay with that?
Speaker 9: I will say that in every democracy around the world, we are seeing, a rising movements of of skepticism about democracy itself. Citizens cannot take their democracies for granted. And that means standing for democracy against authoritarianism in favor of the peace and prosperity that ensures a better future forever.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry, but I'm not sure what democracy you were talking about since you were so worried about people being skeptic about it. Because as far as reality is concerned, your government and many other democratic governments are controlling the flow of information on what their citizens can and cannot know about. You're expanding government regulation of online speech. You frame people protesting your government and your mandates as violent extremists. You froze their bank accounts.
I mean, you you basically you call every criticism against you hate and hate speech. None of that is democracy. That's authoritarianism 101. So again, I'm not sure what the fuck you're talking about.
Speaker 7: His idea is to stay in until he drops dead.
Speaker 10: I I don't understand why people are not taking him seriously.
Speaker 8: He was vicious to have
Speaker 10: He's vicious. Vicious. And why will why will he not do that in this country? It's what he wants, what he envisions the world to be, which is chaos and and craziness, total craziness.
Speaker 0: Well, Robert, Whoopi, I'm not sure if you ever listened to yourselves because you're sitting here trying to persuade the public that you can read Trump's inner thoughts while you ignore the results of his actions, which included a better economy, lower taxes, and 4 years of peace around the world. All of which are gone under the current president. So I would say the total craziness that you're talking about is taking political advice from a panel of mentally ill hosts and a watched up Hollywood actor who have no idea what they're talking about.
Speaker 7: And yesterday, she appeared on the most popular podcast among women called her daddy. Take a look.
Speaker 1: Can we try
Speaker 8: Mhmm.
Speaker 5: To think of any law that gives the government the power to make a decision about a man's body? No.
Speaker 1: No. These are any laws. No.
Speaker 7: Mhmm. No.
Speaker 0: Draft. In terms of war, the government only forces men to fight and probably get killed. It's called military draft or
Speaker 11: selective
Speaker 10: service.
Speaker 1: I think what's really shocking about this is the way he kind of just walks right into Moscow and presents himself on a silver silver platter to the Kremlin, doing the Kremlin's job of misinforming, disinforming the American population.
Speaker 0: Wait a minute. Julia, the only group shocked by what an independent journalist like Tucker is doing is the corrupt establishment propaganda media and activists like you. Now just like our own politicians, Putin is not an innocent guy. But it's obvious that you're just mad that with the Tucker interview, he will be able to present his side of this story. I mean, the war has gone on for 2 years.
People are dying and y'all only care about sending more taxpayers' money to Ukraine to continue the war, which only causes more people to die. So if you had just a bit of integrity, you would be interested in this interview instead of calling it misinforming and disinforming the American population like a fucking NPC you are.
Speaker 1: Do you think it would be wise of president Biden to preemptively pardon your wife, Hillary Clinton? She apparently is on Kash Patel's list.
Speaker 12: 1st, she didn't do anything wrong.
Speaker 8: Of course.
Speaker 12: 2nd, she followed the rules exactly as they were written.
Speaker 13: Mhmm. Remember how the emails were such a big issue in 2016?
Speaker 11: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 13: Trump's state department found that Hillary sent and received exactly 0 Mhmm. Classified emails Mhmm. On her personal device.
Speaker 0: Well, I love the confidence, Bill, but that's a very dishonest way to put it because they found that she committed a total of 91 security violations involving the emails, but the FBI just decided not to charge her. And that's the same FBI, by the way, that refuses to disclose a certain famous list that you may be familiar with. We call it the Epstein list. You may call it, I don't know, getting a massage with friends list. And I'm doing very good mentally.
I'm not suicidal. But let me ask you this. If you had to take a guess, would you say that the FBI found exactly 0 people on the list?
Speaker 7: Let's talk about the real stuff. Your pocketbook's bad not because the Bidens did anything. It's because the folks that own the groceries are pigs.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 7: Gas is high not because the Bidens didn't try to help, but because the folks who control that Yes. Decided, I
Speaker 11: want more
Speaker 0: money. High grocery prices are caused by inflation. Inflation comes from economic issues mostly driven by the decisions of a country's leader, in this case, Biden and Kamal. Hold on. Now high gas prices are mainly due to the Russia Ukraine war, which has started under Biden and Kamala and is still being funded by Biden and Kamala.
At the same time, Biden and Kamala's crackdown on domestic energy production has further driven gas prices up. And I appreciate the World Economic Forum providing me the opportunity to be on this stage and say, fuck you, Klaus Schwab, and fuck your new world order. We, the people, were born free. We will stay free. And you and all of your globalist friends, including everyone in this room, can go fuck yourself.
Speaker 1: You're one who's sort of gone mano to mano with Trump. What advice would you have for madam vice president?
Speaker 14: She'll be there to talk about an economy that works for everyone, about taking us into a a wonderful unified future. And that, as you said, takes us away from, all this disruption that he has caused over the years.
Speaker 0: Well, let me just taking us away from the disruption caused by Trump, just so you know, Trump has not been president for the past 4 years. Biden and Harris have been in charge. And all these promises, she's gonna fix the economy, she's gonna bring down prices again. Kamala is the vice president right now. She has had 4 years to bring down prices.
So my question is, why doesn't she fix those issues right now?
Speaker 8: So there's this clip going viral online of a dozen women being asked the following question. Do we need men? Most answered very quickly, no. So why do you think that is? Because men are useless.
Speaker 11: Broadly speaking, I feel like men have proven largely useless, like I think in the political moment.
Speaker 8: Love it. And by the way, I wanna I wanna differentiate between straight men and gay men because I think I would die without gay men.
Speaker 0: Excuse me. I gotta the ABC network, which is hosting this show, would have canceled the show if it were a panel of men saying that women are useless. I see the producer right there. I wonder what you think about this one. Y'all would have called them misogynists, and the media would have destroyed the lives of those men.
That's something to reflect on. And aside from that, everything you just said were emotional responses, but that's to be expected from a low IQ panel.
Speaker 15: And and do I think Aris is the heir apparent? I do, not only because they'll probably try to rig it to get it to her, but even if they had an open convention.
Speaker 0: Okay. Wait a minute, Chris. Everyone in this country was told by you, the mainstream media, and people around this table that Democrats don't rig elections. It was a dangerous conspiracy theory. No one was allowed to talk about it.
Yet Biden won the 2024 primary, and now the Democrats are trying to push him out, which is called a coup. Okay? And you just said the Democrats will probably rig it to get it to Kamala. Now isn't it very ironic to hear all of that happening inside the party of democracy?
Speaker 16: Because Donald Trump is doing something that was just brought to my attention this weekend. He's on a podcast, tour, like, with these some pretty crazy people. Yeah. But the reach of these podcasts is massive. They're getting millions of hit.
I saw a clip this weekend that a friend showed me. It was 20,000,000 hits. He is hitting them all.
Speaker 0: Okay, Sarah. Let me just I'm not sure why you would call podcasters like Lex Frittman, Logan Paul, Aidan Ross, all of these people who, by the way, do a much better job on interviewing people than you do because you are very biased. The hosts on this show are very biased, but I get it because you are supported by the Fake News ABC. But I'm not sure why you would call these people crazy for simply having a conversation with Trump. But I understand your frustration since your show, this show, has 1,000,000 of dollars in budget, and you still cannot even get a fraction of the views that they are pulling in.
Speaker 13: Are you ready for a new world order?
Speaker 0: Well, am I ready for an unelected global communist regime that's going to rule over the people of earth? Absolutely not. And aside from a bunch of power hungry psychopaths in this room, I don't think anyone else is. But what I am ready for is for all of y'all to go fuck yourselves.
Speaker 7: But I'm saying, you know, people will bitching and moaning and saying, you know, it's your fault that the grocery no. The people we shop with, it's their issue because they have people they have to give money to. If their if your prices are high, it's because the people we're shopping with are charging us more money.
Speaker 0: Well, Wolfie, I don't even know how to process what you just said. But the fact that you're blaming business owners for high prices when they're simply responding to the inflation caused by the Biden Harris administration is nothing short of outright dishonesty or a complete lack of understanding of basic economics. And frankly, you're demonstrating both.
Speaker 7: You don't have you are not in office yet.
Speaker 17: Yes. But You are not elected official.
Speaker 7: You are not an elected official.
Speaker 11: Yeah. Everyone in DC knows it's terrible for the government to shut down. They've gotta get this figured out.
Speaker 7: But they're being led by 7,000 people. Yeah. Yeah. When you're doing what this guy is doing, it's not right. You are not an elected official.
People didn't vote for you.
Speaker 0: Woah. Woofy. I don't see how not being an elected official is relevant here because Elon doesn't have anything to do with the bill, but the people of this country do. He's just being transparent and amplifying exactly how the government is spending taxpayers' money in this bill. I mean, the original bill is 1500 pages.
That's longer than many novels. Maybe not as long as that ever growing list of genders that you people keep coming up with, but 1500 pages, that's just wild. And the stuff in this bill. I gotta pull it up. I gotta pull it up.
A 40% pay hike for Congress, 50,000,000 to fund college tuition for Egyptians, $61,000,000,000 for Ukraine, funding for multiple biolabs, hello, coronavirus, $850,000 for a gay senior living center. What is that? $83,000,000 for DEI programs. And the list goes on and on. So maybe instead of being outraged by Elon and just the hardworking Americans shining lights on the content of this bill and how the government is spending their money, you should be outraged by $400,000 for transgender clothing expenses, whatever the hell that means.
Speaker 8: You know, I'm I'm very happy Donald Trump is safe. Full stop. Period. And I condemn all forms of political violence.
Speaker 0: Well, Anna, why would you be happy that someone like Trump is safe? Because for years, every single one of you and your friends in the media said Trump is the biggest danger to democracy. You said he's going to take away your freedom. You said he's going to end America if he becomes president again. All of you compared him to Hitler.
So either you're lying when you say you're happy that someone like Hitler is safe, why would you be happy that someone like Hitler is safe? Or you didn't actually believe the things that you said about him. But here's reality, there are people out there who believed when you said Trump is going to take away their freedom. They believed you when you compared him to Hitler, and one of them stepped up and did something about it. So, no matter how you look at this, what happened here is on you and your friends in the mainstream media.
And I hope you can reflect and from now on, make sure to take your emotional outbursts to the mirror and not on TV.
Speaker 18: This election is not about age, but it's about character. So you have two choices. You have my husband, Joe, who you all know, who has integrity. He's strong. He's steady.
He's a leader. He's smart. He's energetic. Or you have chaos. And my husband's and you're gonna see how smart he is and the experience he has.
I believe that Americans are going to choose good over evil.
Speaker 0: Okay. So, madam first lady, respectfully, it's very bold of you to sit here and talk about good and evil given your husband has demonized half of the country and continues to do so while prosecuting his political opponent. Now, Joe has been in politics for 48 years, including his presidency. Yet, you have nothing to show for. Otherwise, you would have spent your time here talking about his actual accomplishments instead of saying empty words.
And finally, I agree, this election is not about age. It is about being able to walk without getting lost. It is about being able to find your way off a stage. It is about being able to go up and down the stairs without falling. It is about being able to finish a sentence, all of which Joe is not able to do on daily basis.
I have seen it. People out there have seen it. Even Boopi has seen it. I wish you were honest about it. And most importantly, you have seen it.
We all know Joe is not well. We all know he's not in control. And, listen, I'm not a fan of his, but I would say you should be ashamed of yourself for putting him through this and letting his handlers abuse him like a puppet. Shame on
Speaker 11: you. Mhmm.
Speaker 19: Do you do you feel like Elon Musk is going to get pressed to get in there one way or another?
Speaker 1: Well, it
Speaker 20: would be good for Elon Musk. That's certainly true. Because, you know, he'll just have some more trouble in the Biden administration if there's a second Biden administration around a bunch of things. And so Trump would be a savior for him in that regard because he would lay off of him and let him continue to do what he's been doing.
Speaker 1: Will he ever put that on?
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. We can't let that one slip. You just said Elon Musk will have troubles if there is a second Biden administration for a bunch of things. And that if Trump wins, he will let him continue doing what he's doing. What is Elon Musk doing aside from running successful companies and not doing anything illegal?
Because the only thing that made people like you, the left and the Biden administration, change their tone about Elon Musk is that he turned x into a free speech platform. So to me, what you just said sounds like a threat. It sounds like if Biden wins, he's going to go after Elon Musk because he's providing free speech. Am I wrong for that assumption?
Speaker 19: Karis Fisher. Mhmm. Thank you very much.
Speaker 11: But more importantly on this issue, women I'm I'm 35. I'm thinking about starting a family. Everyone in my friend group is either dealing with struggles to get pregnant, losing babies that they wanted to, or finding a partner and they want to have kids, but they haven't found someone. Or a number of them just have chosen it's not the right path for them and that we demonize and shame people on the most personal private decision.
Speaker 0: Well, Alicia, in the examples you just gave, you presented most of those issues as if they're out of your control, but they're not. The risk of miscarriage rises with age. Fertility drops significantly in the late twenties. The eggs go bye bye. Okay?
So, of course, your friends struggle to get pregnant. Of course, they lose babies that they wanted when they choose to have children after 30. And naturally, finding a man becomes harder since men consider the factors I just mentioned and so they look for younger women to have children with. Now, all of these are results of prioritizing your career over having kids at a younger age. And it's not demonizing women to say that.
It's just so if you end up with 3 cats, you can reflect on why you ended up with 3 cats.
Speaker 8: He's such a looks sis too, you know, besides
Speaker 11: the cats.
Speaker 10: First of
Speaker 8: all, he can't believe that a beautiful girl like that would not be on his team.
Speaker 11: He is the smallest man who ever lived. He thinks the only way to pay a woman a compliment is to repeatedly compliment her. There's no Taylor Swift who's never been told she's pretty before and, like, that just might bring her around to his side. It just shows how his brain works.
Speaker 0: Okay. Alyssa, Joy, the things that you're saying are not really a Trump thing. Look, most men compliment women by complimenting their look. You are the ones thinking we care about your accomplishments and what you do, but we really don't. I mean, after all, all of you put on makeup when you go out or when you show up here.
So you are the ones prioritizing your look and your beauty every single day, unless you're whoopie or joy, of course. Because I look at you, I see you, and I would say even with makeup on, you don't look good to be honest with you. I hope you're not insulted. I would never, under any circumstances, compliment your look. Now I'm honest when I say it.
I hope, again, you're not insulted.
Speaker 7: Here's his take on women who serve their country.
Speaker 21: You don't like women in combat?
Speaker 22: No. I love women service members who contribute amazingly. You maintain the standards where they are for everybody.
Speaker 23: Mhmm.
Speaker 22: And if there's some, you know, hard charging female that meets that standard, great. Cool. Join the infantry battalion.
Speaker 8: He keep that. All I heard was that women can't be in combat. Again, another sort of take women down.
Speaker 1: I think that says a lot about who he is. And so I think we're seeing misogyny play out. I think we're seeing racism play out. And Well,
Speaker 0: I'm not sure how does misogyny or taking down women because on the battlefield, the enemy won't treat you any differently because you are a woman or they want to approach you with diversity in mind. They will simply you up. Okay? Because men are physically stronger than women. There are, of course, exceptions, but, generally, men are stronger than women, and that's not misogynistic.
It is biologistic. Okay? So maybe leave the military stuff to people who know what they're talking about, and instead, take care of your own show. And if you did a good job of that, I won't be sitting here to save your failing ratings.
Speaker 4: I interviewed about a 100, duty officers from the White House, and these are people that come from all over the government, the CIA, the DIA, defense department, military. And, you know, some people like to call those people the deep state.
Speaker 7: Deep state.
Speaker 3: Well, the
Speaker 4: big thing I learned is that the deep state is packed with patriots. People who go to work every single day on the front lines and do it to serve their country and to serve the presidency, not the president. They don't care about political parties. They're there to serve the presidency and the institution.
Speaker 1: And they're doing it anonymously.
Speaker 8: Absolutely. As one
Speaker 4: of them told me, Mike Seeley said, you know, we serve in silence.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Okay. Hold on, George. For years, you and your friends in the mainstream media called everyone a right wing conspiracy theorist for saying that there is a deep state. Yet now you're sitting here openly admitting that there is in fact a deep state, but hey, they are patriots. I mean, the level of gaslighting here is unworldly.
And I'm amazed that y'all keep talking about Trump is a dangerous to democracy, we need to save our democracy. Yet, you're casually praising a group of unelected people controlling the country anonymously and in silence. Your words, not mine. So that's not just hypocrisy, that is evil. And for that,
Speaker 10: George, fuck
Speaker 11: you.
Speaker 17: Job number 2 is to pass the Voting Rights Act. Again, suspend the filibuster in the Senate and put our nickels down as a nation on the power of democracy. And that means the right to vote Yeah. The right to get your vote counted, any gerrymandering, and I wanna put in a plug, and DC statehood.
Speaker 7: Yes. Finally. Yeah.
Speaker 17: There is. It's some real democracy. And I do want more real quick.
Speaker 0: Miss Zlorna, let me just say this. You and your party keep talking about voting rights even though every single citizen in this country has them. They just have to show a proof of citizenship or an ID. Now your position is that, well, there are so many minorities who do not have an ID, but their voices should be heard too. They should be able to vote.
Okay, I see. But the problem with that case is that you're actually undermining the intelligence of minorities by asserting that they cannot figure out how to get an ID. Now let me ask you this question: what do you call someone who looks down on minorities and undermines their intelligence?
Speaker 11: There are absolutely racist people in this country. It is not the vast majority of people in this country, and I feel like
Speaker 0: we don't
Speaker 1: have that. Director said white supremacy is the that but that's so different. Country today. I just experienced my son walking down the beach being called the n word
Speaker 0: several times. Sunny, first and foremost, there are racists in every racial group. But here's the sad reality, are you ready? As a person of color, you can openly be racist towards white people and guess what? You'll get a pass for it.
That's the number that the FBI, the corrupt FBI, doesn't count. Instead, they focus on incidents against blacks and say, White Supremacy is the biggest problem in the country. Now you said, you can't dismiss my lived experience, yet you came up with only one example, your entire life as a Black person and you had only one example and it wasn't even related to you, it was related to your son. And given how dishonest you usually are, I would say that whole story smells a little bit like Juicy Sommelier and I think you know who that is.
Speaker 7: This isn't just about food. No. It's not. This is sometimes people are born genetically larger. That's you're setting folks up for shame.
Maybe you don't know you're doing. I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt because I weighed close to 300. Yeah. And without the Majaro
Speaker 10: Mhmm.
Speaker 7: This would not have happened. Thank you.
Speaker 11: Take it off. Take it
Speaker 7: off. No. And I'm very proud. Listen. This worked for me.
This may work for y'all. Because if we can keep people healthy Yes. What's wrong with trying to do that?
Speaker 0: Well, Wolfie, you help obese people become healthy by being honest about these issues, like, with the cheering here. I think we should applaud people for their efforts in losing weight. Because cheering for someone who takes a shortcut with pharmaceutical drugs not only undermines these principles, but sends a damaging message, to be honest with you. And there are studies on this showing that people on these drugs lose about 21% of their weight, and then within a year of stopping, they gain half of the weight they lost. And guess what?
The regain happens because they don't make the necessary life changes. I don't know, like cutting back on decoupling down and taking a few more steps. So it is mostly about food. Over 40% of American adults are obese. 40%.
You cannot sugarcoat that with, well, sometimes it's genetic. They will literally eat the sugarcoat.
Speaker 11: Listen. We forget that we live in information silos. This is so different than how the media was even 10 years ago, where people largely got their news and their information from legacy media, where there is a level of objectivity and a fact checking involved. So if you perhaps get and I'm just saying this for an example. Get all your news on Facebook.
If you're a Trump supporter online, you very likely won't encounter ever some of the worst things that he has said.
Speaker 0: Well, Alicia, I love your confidence, but the media is not objective at all, and this show alone is a living example of that. And to your second point, both sides have their own bubble, of course. And again, I wish you were as right as your confidence implies, but the actual data shows that Democrats are more likely to stay within their own news bubble compared to Republicans. So Trump supporters do actually encounter the worst things that Trump has said, but they also know that the worst things that Trump has said are just out of context clips pushed by the Democrat run media and people such as yourself.
Speaker 7: He never said that. He said he was thinking about a woman. He never said her color. He never said anything. If you're going to attack people, try to try to do it in a factual manner.
I know that is almost insane for you to think about, but a fact really does make a difference.
Speaker 0: Well, whoopie, I love your confidence. But he said he's thinking about a woman, and among them, there are 4 black women. Then he picked Kamala and now that she's running, she's being promoted for being a black woman, which is fine. But for the party that doesn't care about her skin color, why does it matter that she's black? And my question to all of you here is, what the hell is a woman?
Speaker 24: I think it is you, the women, who have had the most diabolical lies told to you. How many of you are sitting here now about to cross this stage and are thinking about all the promotions and titles you are going to get in your career? Some of you may go on to lead successful careers in the world, but I would venture to guess that the majority of you are most excited about your marriage and the children you will bring into this world.
Speaker 7: These are his beliefs, and he's welcome to them. I don't have to believe them.
Speaker 16: This is, someone who's practicing something called the traditional Latin mass Yes. Which is divergent from the majority of Catholics. It's compared to being cult like and extremist like some religions in the Middle East and Asia.
Speaker 0: Well, Sarah, whoopie, everything that the man is saying have constantly been proven by, here's the word, data. Data is not belief. It's data. Married women with children are happier than those who are unmarried or those who are married and do not have children. And children with married biological parents tend to have better outcomes.
So it's very sad that everything that was normal 5 minutes ago is now extreme in the eyes of modern liberalism and feminism, toxic feminism. I'd call it toxic feminism. I bet TikTok wouldn't like this. Zuckerberg wouldn't like this. It's called toxic feminism because modern liberalism and toxic feminism is destroying the structure of family.
And that's not an opinion or a belief. It's a fact.
Speaker 25: I went into this with my eyes open. And that look. This is just an old saying in the south, and they say you knew I was a snake before you picked me up. Yeah. Because it he knows who Don Lemon is.
Mhmm. He knew who I was. He asked me to come on the platform. He offered incentives and money.
Speaker 1: And I would bet they
Speaker 8: were basically begging you to do it. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. They were. Excuse me, Don. A few points here. First, the snake example.
Weirdly honest. I don't know if that was your intention. I don't think it was. But regarding Musk and x offering you incentives and money and then canceling their contract with you, which you've been complaining about, a story just came out mentioning that in order for you to take your show, I would say your failure of the show, but we will see, to x, you demanded. I gotta pull up the list.
A free Cybertruck, a 5,000,000 upfront payment and an 8,000,000 salary, an equity stake in x, right to approve any changes in x policy as it relates to news content, a private jet fly to Las Vegas, climate. Remember climate. X covering for your day drinking and your massages, a suite for you and your fiance, and to host the 1st podcast in a space via SpaceX. And again, while you've been complaining about them canceling your contract, these are the things that you've been hiding. But again, you are Don Lemon, a spoiled activist journalist who even got dropped by fake news CNN.
So I'm not surprised.
Speaker 1: You know, I know that as a country, it's very difficult for people to to believe that racism and misogyny, they're just alive and well.
Speaker 11: If you really think the vast majority of this country voted because of racism and misogyny I didn't think that. You're missing. Most of my family the vast majority of the have college degrees.
Speaker 1: Stats are the stats.
Speaker 11: But that's not it doesn't say I'm white. I voted for Donald Trump because of racism.
Speaker 1: It but the but the
Speaker 11: That's not major stat. What stat are
Speaker 17: you talking about?
Speaker 11: Let me just dissect the Jess,
Speaker 16: you can't.
Speaker 10: Come down. Okay.
Speaker 0: Come down. Alicia, you got some common sense there. I'm glad the therapy is working. Now, Sonny, since the election, you keep crying and blaming misogyny and racism as a reason for Kamala's laws. Okay.
Obama was president. He black. Hillary won the popular vote. She's a woman. And you, you are a woman and you're black and you're making well over a1000000 a year on this show, which puts you in the top 0.1 percent of earners in America.
I guess racism and misogyny have not stopped you now, have they?
Speaker 23: Trump says if he gets elected, he wants to get the hell out of NATO. I've been able to put together what they call the quad in the in the in the South Pacific in that area to increase we have a chance to reorder the world in a way that is not not Shangri La, but it is real. Fundamental changes.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry, but you cannot even take care of your own country. Open borders, inflation, 2 new wars, all under your watch. And I'm not even sure if you have any idea where you are right now, and you want to reorder the world. I mean, you people destroyed the Middle East. Millions and millions of people, including Americans, died.
And your most recent beauty was the shat show you left in Afghanistan. And now the world is closer than it has ever been to World War 3, all because you and your friends are trying to reorder the world. So the people of Earth appreciate your offer, but no thanks. You, NATO, the World Economic Forum, and all of these people should rather reorder these three words. Yourself, go.
Speaker 3: Right? RFK Junior, leaving the race, endorsing Donald Trump, bear cubs, brain worms, all of it. Okay? What do you make of it? Because because he he was an unserious man too.
Sadly, because he got a great family legacy. He could have been a serious guy, but he chose to be an unserious guy. He was never going to be president. He still carried on about how the fact that he might actually still be president of the United States. It's a lot of BS.
But what do you make of this whole development?
Speaker 0: Well, Ali, Tulsi Gabbard, Elon Musk, and now RFK Jr. Endorsing Trump is what happens when the Democratic party moves further and further to the extremes of its own ideology. And instead of reflecting on their batshit crazy ideas, the Democrats attack these people for leaving them. Just as you did with your question, which was asked in a way that made it more of a statement and a character attack on RFK Jr. Something that's, of course, expected from the Democrat run network, MSNBC.
Speaker 26: I think a lot of us are still apoplectic that America put in this racist, misogynist, and they
Speaker 8: don't care. So it's tiring. It is exhausting. I gotta breathe. I my mental health has gotta be in a good place.
My physical health has got to
Speaker 7: be in a good place. And I listen to people make fun of it. You know, it's not about race. It's not about misogyny. It is for me.
It is for me.
Speaker 0: Well, Wolfie, I'm glad that you're now admitting that this entire race and misogyny hustling that you got going on on this show is based on your feelings about Americans who elected Trump and not the objective reality. Now the word for that is delusion. Used in a sentence, you would say, Whoopi is delusional. Or Anna's breakdown that we just witnessed stems from her delusion and is impacting her physical and mental health, which is what you just said. Okay?
You can even go further. Sunny reigns as the queen of delusional thinking. You all get the idea. Right?
Speaker 1: I think it's really ironic that we're the only party talking about needing to replace our nominee. A party that should be pressuring their candidate to step aside is the Republican Party. Their nominee is a convicted felon. Republicans need to be holding him accountable. The majority of the party, which has been cowardly and feckless and complicit and enabling in allowing Trump's racism, bullying, his demagoguery Misogyny.
Misogyny. Why are we as Democrats calling for our nominees?
Speaker 0: Sunny, let me just just days before the debate, the tone on this show was that Trump is scared to debate Biden. And now that even your side agrees that Biden lost the debate, you say that Trump is the one that should be replaced because he's a racist and a misogynist? And you're not even aware of how emotionally unhinged you sound. And by the way, we have talked about this before, so let me ask you one more time. Give me one example of Trump being a racist or a misogynist.
Let's go.
Speaker 11: Like, he used him as his puppet, and it exposed what many of us have been saying about Tucker Carlson. He's a Kremlin puppet who doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.
Speaker 1: It's just such a disgrace, I think, to our country that an American would give him any kind of platform to, propogandize.
Speaker 0: Wait. I'm if I may, I'm amazed at the level of self projection going on here. I mean, Alicia, you work for ABC, Tucker works for himself. Objectively, you are a puppet and he's not. And, Sonny, you're basically saying that Tucker shouldn't be allowed to have a voice.
That's the opposite of the democracy that you preach every time we are here. And finally, none of you had any examples on what Tucker has said that was a lie or propaganda. But I'm too nice, so I will give you another chance. Give me some specific examples to back your claims. Let's go.
Speaker 27: So my mom and I executive produced a documentary called Zorowski v Texas that follows 3 extraordinarily courageous women who were denied medically necessary abortion care. And I think we have to, like, bear witness to these stories because we do think these stories need to be heard.
Speaker 0: Okay. So, Chelsea, I'm glad for you and your new documentary. But talking about the stories that need to be told and your activism to help women, are you going to make a documentary about the victims of Jeffrey Epstein, who's the famous island your father visited many times, not to mention Epstein's girlfriend, who's also a convicted sex trafficker, attended your wedding? But are you going to tell the story of those victims?
Speaker 1: You know, I think that, she certainly does have a problem with men because misogyny is a real thing in this country.
Speaker 8: Black I
Speaker 1: don't think black men are the problem. Yeah. Black men are not the problem. Black men are used to matriarchy. Okay?
Black men are used to black women being the heads of the family. They are used to that.
Speaker 0: Well, Sunny, matriarchy as a result of fatherless home is not the matriarchy you wanna brag about. And back to what you just said, accusing men of being misogynists for not voting for Kamala Harris, None of you are voting for Trump. So by your own logic, you are all misunderstanders. And so yesterday, I stood on this stage and said some things that I should not have said. But we all deserve a second chance, so I would like to apologize to absolutely no one.
None of you were elected to show us how we should live our lives. All of you motherfuckers took your private jets to show up to this meeting, so don't lecture us about the environment. I ain't eating bugs. You can eat these nuts. And once again, you and your fake climate agenda can go fuck.
Speaker 7: We're still here. People I I when I got out of the car today, I saw mailmen, people with their kids. I saw people living their lives, and that's what we have to do.
Speaker 0: Well, Wolfie, what you saw with your own eyes is pretty much impossible because at least for the past 4 years, every single one of you on this show, including your friends in the mainstream media, you told Americans that Trump is like Hitler. You compared his supporters to Nazis. You called him a fascist, a racist, a dictator. And now that he is elected, you're telling me that Americans are going on with their lives? Like, why are you even sitting here, Joy?
You said if elected, Trump will put you and Whoopi in jail for being comedians. Unfunny comedians, I should add. Maybe that should be a crime. I don't know. But all of you are sitting here, and you are just fine.
And that should not be the case if you really believed what you said about Trump. I don't understand.
Speaker 8: The other day on this show, we were talking about what happens if Trump gets in, God forbid. And, he goes after comedians
Speaker 13: like us, you and me, and Whoopi.
Speaker 8: You know? And, do you think there's a problem if he gets in for us? Well, I mean, it it could really happen. He could I mean, he
Speaker 17: he wanted an indicator. Sense of humor.
Speaker 0: Well, let me just Joy, he's not going after comedians. What a ridiculous thing to say. And I think you, Whoopi, and I'm sorry, but I don't know who you are, but the sense of self importance that you all have is just completely out of touch. And, honestly, I understand that comedy is a subjective thing, but I've never heard you say anything funny. Now I'm honest when I say it.
I've never found you funny, and I'm sure a lot of people out there agree with me. I mean, your own producer uses laugh signs to prompt your own audience to laugh, and that is really sad to watch. It is very sad to watch you not being funny, and I think that is what you should worry about.
Speaker 28: He got The Washington Post and Jeff Bezos, who's supposedly a powerful, brilliant billionaire. He got Bezos to back down. Head of Amazon, runs The Washington Post, owns it. He got them to stop what they have been doing timelessly, which is endorsing a candidate. He forced them to not endorse.
That's pretty scary, guys. Yeah.
Speaker 0: News outlets are supposed to remain impartial, and endorsements only reveal their political bias that undermines public trust. But back to what you just said, there is no basis for claiming that Trump ever forced Jeff Bezos and the Washington Post to not endorse a candidate. What a ridiculous thing to even suggest. So I would say what's scary is you making up actual disinformation on the spot, live on air, and presenting it as a fact, which just shows that you're not really a journalist, but an activist.
Speaker 29: And maybe this would be our last election because someone who will not accept the validity of an election is someone who doesn't believe in elections. He believes in his own power, his own right to power, and his demand that he be installed regardless of whether he gets the votes or not.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And, you know, I believe sorry, Joe. I gotta I find the lack of self awareness here astonishing. I mean, talking about not believing in elections and one's own right to power, Hillary, you founded the fakest deal dossier and the Russia collusion hoax to remove Trump from office when he lost the election. Unlike your assumptions and mind readings of Trump, that actually happened.
You did that. So don't talk to me about democracy and, respectfully, go fuck yourself and Jeffrey Epstein's best friend. Hi, Bill.
Speaker 11: I actually have found that I think men are more likely to have bizarrely unrealistic expectations. I have so many girlfriends who are highly accomplished, highly educated, great people, and just wonderful women. And the dating pool is absolutely brutal
Speaker 1: for that. What are these men looking for?
Speaker 11: It is entirely unclear to me that it's like, why are there men not jumping to wanna date them? So if
Speaker 0: Well, Alicia, those are not bizarre and unrealistic expectations. Because reality is that, ultimately, men want to build a family. Okay? And most men don't want to be with an accomplished and educated woman because those women are entitled, demanding, and a pain to deal with. Even different studies would tell you that that's the case.
So most of your accomplished and educated friends are very likely to end up with a cat instead of a family, just like Whoopi.
Speaker 7: And will the Supreme Court step in? I mean, we're in such unprecedented territory. I mean, for me, I just have to say, you know, they keep saying talk about the forefathers. Well, let's be clear. The forefathers didn't want someone above the law.
That's why they didn't want a king. Yeah. That's why they came and made a democracy.
Speaker 0: Well, it's a republic, by the way. But you're right. The forefathers didn't want anyone above the law. But apparently, Clinton made up a fake Steele dossier to remove Trump from office, yet nothing happened to her. George Bush and Obama started multiple illegal wars in the Middle East, killing well over a 1000000 of people, yet nothing happens to them.
So it's clear that a group of certain people whom you support, by the way, are in fact above the law. Now before I call you a hypocrite, I will give you a chance to explain to me how you're not a hypocrite. So let's go. Anyone else?
Speaker 30: But look, over these these two months, just to see the hopefulness and the optimism, folks are folks are ready to move on. They're tired of the division. They're tired of the chaos. They're just Well,
Speaker 0: Tim, I actually agree with everything you just said. People are, in fact, tired of the current division and the cast. They are ready to move on from 4 years of Kamala. So I appreciate your honesty, but I don't think you were supposed to say that.
Speaker 21: All he had to do was say the CDC is recommending masks. We know it's gonna save lives. Do it. So if trying to save people's lives is a crime, then I I'm guilty. You know?
Yeah. What happened with COVID was just pure ad hominem and vitriol. And that really took me by surprise. I thought that there would be that kind of give and take and respect each other's disagreements. And that's the thing that worries me not only about what I have to face, but about the direction of the country and the
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 21: And the and the social order and our democracy. It's it's it's very threatening, I think.
Speaker 0: Okay. Doc, you're sitting here talking about masks saving lives. Yet in the recent hearing, you yourself admitted that there was no science behind the effectiveness of masks. So I'm not sure why you're lying life on air. But here's the thing, you went ahead and pushed people to wear masks.
Children, the safest and last vulnerable group, you made them wear masks, closing the schools. The damage caused by that were way worse than the COVID itself. People got depressed. People committed suicide. Those were the results of your recommendation.
And now you're sitting here saying, I thought people would respect each other's disagreements. I'm worried about social order and democracy. It's a republic, by the way. But you were the one destroying social order. You were the one not respecting disagreements because people lost their jobs and their livelihood for not following your recommendations, which again were based on no science.
I mean, you, yourself, admitted that you approved the funding for Wuhan lab, the famous lab that the mainstream media don't wanna talk about. The lab that engineered COVID, you approved that. So putting all these together, you committed a crime against humanity. And for that, your ass belongs in jail.
Speaker 7: 50 weeks, 75000 weeks, whatever how many weeks, it's nobody's business. It's you, your doctor, and god. That's who you have to be conversational to. And it's not mentioned in the in the big ten. I'm just gonna say.
Speaker 1: No. In
Speaker 7: the big ten. It is not meant. The commandments? Yeah.
Speaker 0: Whoopi, Exodus 2013. Thou shall not kill. It's right there in the amendments.
Speaker 1: You endorsed Joe Biden back in 2020. But this time around, you say you're not going to endorse anybody. Charlemagne, now is not the time, in my opinion, to sit this one out.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I'm not I I didn't say that.
Speaker 15: I never said I was sitting it out. That What
Speaker 1: you gonna do? Why not endorse Biden?
Speaker 15: Because if I'm sitting here telling my listeners that, you know, you have somebody out there who is a threat to democracy, you have somebody out there who said they want to, you know, suspend the constitution to overthrow the results of an election, you saw this person, you know, try to lead an attempted coup of this country. So if I'm saying that about this individual, the choice is clear. Right?
Speaker 0: Okay, Chalamet. Here's the thing. You come on this show to promote your book, which is about the importance of facts, data, and honesty. I wish you had some of it. Then you sit here talking about how Trump is a threat to our democracy, which is a pure Democrat talking point that they've been running on for the last 8 years.
No facts, no data, no honesty, just words. Then you go on. You try to lead an attempted coup, which again is a pure Democrat talking point for those, in this case, you, who are dumb enough to believe that a group of unarmed people touring inside the Capitol could realistically overthrow the entire US government and the military. Again, no facts, no data, but pure democrat propaganda, which once again, you are dumb enough to fall for. But on the bright side, you are smart enough to write a book about facts and data, the message of which you don't follow.
Speaker 7: The media has always been fair to each side. Mhmm. See, we have to tell you both sides. But when they're lying, we can't have it. We can't we can't allow on this show to have things said that we know for a fact are not true.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. Well, Pete, so far this year alone, this show has delivered 16 legal disclaimers. In 2022, this show delivered 36 legal disclaimers. That's a fact on how often you spread misinformation.
@damonimani - Damon Imani
BREAKING: Employee exposes James O'Keefe's revelations regarding BlackRock video https://t.co/xRmLSF0R3B
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am a video editor for O'Keefe Media. Recently, James O'Keefe posted a misleading video about BlackRock that went viral. I want to clarify that BlackRock does not control presidential finances, nor does it buy senators for $10,000. These claims are unfounded. I believe James's actions pose a risk to our democracy, and I urge him to remove the video and apologize to BlackRock. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. I am a video editor, and I work for James O'Keefe and his company, O'Keefe Media. Days ago, James posted a misleading video about BlackRock that quickly went viral, and I'm here to make some things clear. BlackRock does not in any way control the wallet of presidents. That would be like a president leaving office 30 times richer.
Also, the company emphasized the word not, does not buy senators at the price of $10,000. That's just ridiculous. Finally, I think what James is doing is dangerous for our democracy, and I'm sincerely asking him to take down the video immediately and apologize to BlackRock. Thank you.
@damonimani - Damon Imani
BREAKING: Mark Zuckerberg says he's bringing back free speech to Instagram and replacing fact checks with Community Notes. https://t.co/1Y7IkODBFQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're returning to our roots of free expression on Facebook and Instagram. While we've implemented complex content moderation systems, they've led to too many mistakes and censorship. To address this, we will phase out fact checkers in favor of a community notes system, simplify content policies, and focus enforcement on serious violations. We're also reintroducing civic content based on user feedback and relocating our content moderation teams to Texas to reduce perceived bias. Additionally, we will collaborate with the U.S. government to combat global censorship trends. Our goal is to prioritize reducing mistakes and restoring free expression while still addressing illegal content. This is a complex process, but we're committed to giving people a voice once again. More updates will follow.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everyone. I wanna talk about something important today because it's time to get back to our roots around free expression on Facebook and Instagram. I started building social media to give people a voice. I gave a speech at Georgetown 5 years ago about the importance of protecting free expression, and I still believe this today. But a lot has happened over the last several years.
There's been widespread debate about potential harms from online content. Governments and legacy media have pushed to censor more and more. A lot of this is clearly political, but there's also a lot of legitimately bad stuff out there. Drugs, terrorism, child exploitation. These are things that we take very seriously, and I wanna make sure that we handle responsibly.
So we built a lot of complex systems to moderate content. But the problem with complex systems is they make mistakes. Even if they accidentally censor just 1% of posts, that's millions of people. And we've reached a point where it's just too many mistakes and too much censorship. The recent elections also feel like a cultural tipping point towards once again prioritizing speech.
So we're gonna get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies, and restoring free expression on our platforms. More specifically, here's what we're gonna do. 1st, we're gonna get rid of fact checkers and replace them with community notes similar to X starting in the US. After Trump first got elected in 2016, the legacy media wrote nonstop about how misinformation was a threat to democracy. We tried in good faith to address those concerns without becoming the arbiters of truth, But the fact checkers have just been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than they've created, especially in the US.
So over the next couple of months, we're gonna phase in a more comprehensive community note system. 2nd, we're gonna simplify our content policies and get rid of a bunch of restrictions on topics like immigration and gender that are just out of touch with mainstream discourse. What started as a movement to be more inclusive has increasingly been used to shut down opinions and shut out people with different ideas, and it's gone too far. So I wanna make sure that people can share their beliefs and experiences on our platforms. 3rd, we're changing how we enforce our policies to reduce the mistakes that account for the vast majority of censorship on our platforms.
We used to have filters that scanned for any policy violation. Now we're gonna focus those filters on tackling illegal and high severity violations. And for lower severity violations, we're going to rely on someone reporting an issue before we take action. The problem is that the filters make mistakes, and they take down a lot of content that they shouldn't. So by dialing them back, we're gonna dramatically reduce the amount of censorship on our platforms.
We're also going to tune our content filters to require much higher confidence before taking down content. The reality is that this is a trade off. It means we're gonna catch less bad stuff. We'll also reduce the number of innocent people's posts and accounts that we accidentally take down. 4th, we're bringing back civic content.
For a while, the community asked to see less politics because it was making people stressed. So we stopped recommending these posts. But it feels like we're in a new era now, and we're starting to get feedback that people wanna see this content again. So we're gonna start phasing this back into Facebook, Instagram, and threads while working to keep the community is friendly and positive. 5th, we're gonna move our trust and safety and content moderation teams out of California, and our US based content review is gonna be based in Texas.
As we work to promote free expression, I think that it will help us build trust to do this work in places where there is less concern about the bias of our teams. Finally, we're gonna work with president Trump to push back on governments around the world that are going after American companies and pushing to censor more. The US has the strongest constitutional protections for free expression in the world. Europe has an ever increasing number of laws institutionalizing censorship and making it difficult to build anything innovative there. Latin American countries have secret courts that can order companies to quietly take things down.
China has censored our apps from even working in the country. The only way that we can push back on this global trend is with the support of the US government. And that's why it's been so difficult over the past 4 years when even the US government has pushed for censorship. By going after us and other American companies, it has emboldened other governments to go even further. But now we have the opportunity to restore free expression, and I am excited to take it.
It'll take time to get this right. And these are complex systems. They're never gonna be perfect. There's also a lot of illegal stuff that we still need to work very hard to remove. But the bottom line is that after years of having our content moderation work focused primarily on removing content, it is time to focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our systems, and getting back to our roots about giving people voice.
I'm looking forward to this next chapter. Stay good out there, and more to come soon.
@damonimani - Damon Imani
Taking down The View for 9 minutes straight. Enjoy! https://t.co/ypOcX7AO0q
Video Transcript AI Summary
Leave military discussions to experts and focus on your own issues. Despite claims of chaos, people are living their lives. For years, you've painted Trump as a dictator, yet now you say Americans are fine. High grocery prices stem from inflation, largely due to Biden's policies, while gas prices are affected by the Russia-Ukraine war and domestic energy restrictions. The media's portrayal of Trump supporters fuels division. Claims of racism and misogyny in voting are misguided; many voters have diverse backgrounds and motivations. Misogyny in military discussions is misplaced; physical strength varies, but combat is not about gender. Focus on your own show instead of attacking others.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Maybe leave the military stuff to people who know what they're talking about, and instead take care of your own shit. And if we did a good job of that, I won't be sitting here to save your failing ratings.
Speaker 1: We're still here. People I I when I got out of the car today, I saw mailmen, people with their kids. I saw people living their lives, and that's what we have to do.
Speaker 0: Well, Wolfie, what you saw with your own eyes is pretty much impossible because at least for the past 4 years, every single one of you on this show, including your friends in the mainstream media, you told Americans that Trump is like Hitler. You compared his supporters to Nazis. You called him a fascist, a racist, a dictator. And now that he is elected, you're telling me that Americans are going on with their lives? Like, why are you even sitting here, Joy?
You said if elected, Trump will put you and Whoopi in jail for being comedians, unfunny comedians, I should add. Maybe that should be a crime. I don't know. But all of you are sitting here, and you are just fine. And that should not be the case if you really believed what you said about Trump.
I don't understand.
Speaker 2: Donald Trump had this to say about Liz Cheney. Pay attention to this. Watch this.
Speaker 3: She's a radical war hawk. Let's put her with a rifle standing there with 9 barrel shooting at her. Okay? Let's see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained in her face.
Speaker 4: This is exactly what communists do. Yep. They shoot their opponents Right. Their opposition in firing squads. Do you see that as a direct threat?
Speaker 0: Oh, well, we've asked to Liz. Absolutely. Mhmm. Trump made the point that Liz Cheney wouldn't be so quick to send young American soldiers to die in wars if she were in their shoes having a rifle pointing at her. But you cut the first half of the clip to distort its context, actively generating a false narrative to mislead your audience.
That is called disinformation.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about the real stuff. Your pocketbook's bad not because the Bidens did anything. It's because the folks that own the groceries are pigs.
Speaker 5: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Gas is high not because the Bidens didn't try to help, but because the folks who control that Yes. Decided,
Speaker 3: I want more money.
Speaker 0: High grocery prices are caused by inflation. Inflation comes from economic issues mostly driven by the decisions of a country's leader, in this case, Biden and Kamal. Hold on. Now high gas prices are mainly due to the Russia, Ukraine war, which has started under Biden and Kamala and is still being funded by Biden and Kamala. At the same time, Biden and Kamala's crackdown on domestic energy production has further driven gas prices up.
Speaker 1: Former member of the Pussycat Dolls, Nicole Scherzinger, is getting backlash for commenting on a post, MAGA supporter, Russell Brand, holding a cap reading make Jesus first again, asking him where can I get that hat? Because she liked the hat that said make Jesus whatever the hat
Speaker 5: said is again.
Speaker 1: First again. So why do you think people can't see what she was commenting?
Speaker 0: Well, gee, Whoopi, I don't know. Could it be that they behave this way because the entire mainstream media, including every one of you on this show, spend your airtime radicalizing your liberal base against conservatives and Trump supporters, or is that a level of honesty you're just not ready for?
Speaker 4: I think a lot of us are still apoplectic that America put in this racist misogynist, and they don't care. So it's tiring. It is exhausting. I gotta breathe. I my mental health has gotta be in a good place.
My physical health has got to be in a
Speaker 1: good place. And I listen to people make fun of it. You know, it's not about race. It's not about misogyny. It is for me.
It is for me.
Speaker 0: Well, Wolfie, I'm glad that you're now admitting that this entire race and misogyny hustling that you got going on on this show is based on your feelings about Americans who elected Trump and not the objective reality. Now the word for that is delusion. Used in a sentence, you would say, Whoopi is delusional. Or Anna's breakdown that we just witnessed stems from her delusion and is impacting her physical and mental health, which is what you just said. Okay?
You can even go further. Sunny reigns as the queen of delusional thinking. You all get the idea. Right?
Speaker 2: So Trump's latest cabinet nominee is RFK Jr. For, wait for it, the head of Health and Human Services. He's a longtime vaccine skeptic and conspiracy theorist who has linked antidepressants to school shootings. He wants to get rid of fluoride in the water, cavities
Speaker 4: That's your new new secretary of health, America. Thank you for voting for Donald Trump.
Speaker 0: You're welcome, Anna. But Joy, about the opening monologue that you just gave, very impressive. Now do you mind sharing with us which pharmaceutical company was behind the script for that?
Speaker 6: You know, I know that as a country, it's very difficult for people to to believe that racism and misogyny, they're just alive and well.
Speaker 5: If you really think the vast majority of this country voted because of racism and misogyny, you're missing most of my family. A lot of my family doesn't have college degrees. But that's not it doesn't say I'm white. I voted for Donald Trump because of racism. But this That's not what you're fat.
What what are you talking about? Dissect the You can't.
Speaker 3: Calm down. Okay.
Speaker 0: Calm down. Alicia, you got some common sense there. I'm glad the therapy is working. Now, Sonny, since the election, you keep crying and blaming misogyny and racism as a reason for Kamala's loss. Okay.
Obama was president. He black. Hillary won the popular vote. She's a woman. And you, you are a woman, and you're black, and you're making well over a1000000 a year on this show, which puts you in the top 0.1 percent of earners in America.
I guess racism and misogyny have not stopped you now, have they?
Speaker 1: Here's his take on women who serve their country.
Speaker 3: You don't like women in combat?
Speaker 7: No. I love women service members who contribute amazingly. You maintain the standards where they are for everybody.
Speaker 3: Mhmm. And
Speaker 7: if there's some, you know, hard charging female that meets that standard, great. Cool. Join the infantry battalion.
Speaker 2: He kicked that out. All I heard was that women can't be in combat. Again, another sort of take women at down.
Speaker 6: I think that says a lot about who he is. And so I think we're seeing misogyny play out. I think we're seeing racism play out. And Well,
Speaker 0: I'm not sure how does misogyny or taking down women. Because on the battlefield, the enemy won't treat you any differently because you are a woman or they want to approach you with diversity in mind. They will simply you up. Okay? Because men are physically stronger than women.
There are, of course, exceptions, but generally, men are stronger than women. And that's not misogynistic. It is biologistic. Okay? So maybe leave the military stuff to people who know what they're talking about, and instead, take care of your own show.
And if you did a good job of that, I won't be sitting here to save your failing ratings.
@damonimani - Damon Imani
Taking down Fake News media for 10 minutes straight. Sit back and enjoy! https://t.co/bz0epfnazA
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss various topics, including LGBTQ history, voting rights, and political figures. They debate issues such as the legitimacy of voting rights concerns and the handling of political figures in the media. The conversation touches on Kamala Harris, Trump disavowing Project 2025, and the portrayal of politicians in the media. The discussion also delves into accusations of sexism and the handling of COVID-19 restrictions by a political figure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And to your point, Sunny, your boos mean nothing to me. I have seen you cheer Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: And we're the truth tellers. Yeah. And Thank you. It wasn't always easy to tell the truth. It's not.
Because there was a lot a lot of pushback. And I also believe our young LGBTQ community needs to know their history.
Speaker 0: Okay. So, Judy, talking about being a truth teller in history, let's talk about an important framework of LGBT, the queer theory. Because the founders of queer theory were advocates of legalizing pedophilia. Okay? One of them, Gail Rubin, in her foundational text of queer theory, sympathized with boy lovers, aka pedophiles.
The other, Michel Foucault, said, to die for the love of boys. What a beautiful thing. That's the exact quote, and he said that while he was dying of AIDS. And the third one, Judith Butler, argued that incest may not always be a violation. So
Speaker 2: Job number 2 is to pass the Voting Rights Act. Again, suspend the filibuster in the Senate and put our nickels down as a nation on the power of democracy. And that means the right to vote Yeah. The right to get your vote counted, any gerrymandering, and I wanna put in a plug, and DC statehood.
Speaker 3: Yes. Finally. Yeah.
Speaker 2: There is some real democracy. And I do want more real quick.
Speaker 0: Missus Orna, let me just say this. You and your party keep talking about voting rights even though every single citizen in this country has them. They just have to show a proof of citizenship or an ID. Now your position is that, well, there are so many minorities who do not have an ID, but their voices should be heard too, they should be able to vote. Okay, I see.
But the problem with that case is that you're actually undermining the intelligence of minorities by asserting that they cannot figure out how to get an ID. Now, let me ask you this question, what do you call someone who looks down on minorities and undermines their intelligence?
Speaker 3: I don't care if he's pooped his pants. I don't care if he can't put a sentence together. Show me he can't do the job, and then I'll say, okay. Maybe it's time to go.
Speaker 0: Well, whoopie, not pooping your pants and being able to finish a sentence is actually part of the job, so I don't know what you're talking about. But here's the bigger picture. The way the bar is being lowered for Joe Biden by the mainstream media every single day is a phenomenon. I mean, you yourself, your tone has shifted from dismissing all the health concerns around Joe Biden as right wing disinformation to now saying you don't even care if he poops his pants. So you're not only distorting the objective reality, but you're also lying about it, and I think that's an insult to your audience.
Speaker 4: And and do I think Aris is the heir apparent? I do. Not only because they'll probably try to rig it to get it to her, but even if they had an open convention
Speaker 0: Wait a minute, Chris. Everyone in this country was told by you, the mainstream media, and people around this table that Democrats don't rig elections. It was a dangerous conspiracy theory. No one was allowed to talk about it. Yet Biden won the 2024 primary, and now the Democrats are trying to push him out, which is called a coup.
Okay? And you just said the Democrats will probably rig it to get it to Kamala. Now isn't it very ironic to hear all of that happening inside the party of democracy?
Speaker 5: His only question was, what's this project 2025 I keep hearing about? Which suggests to me that it has, to Amanda's point, it it it has taken on a kind of virality out past the sort of circle of people that are avid news consumers.
Speaker 0: Chris, Trump just disavowed project 2025. And minutes ago, you showed the exact post of him explicitly stating that he has nothing to do with the project and the people behind it. Yet you continue to suggest otherwise, despite the fact that, again, he disavowed it. And that's a perfect example of how fake news is created. But then again, you work for MSNBC, so I'm not surprised.
Speaker 3: He never said that. He said he was thinking about a woman. He never said her color. He never said anything. If you're going to attack people, try to try to do it in a factual manner.
I know that is almost insane for you to think about, but a fact really does make a difference.
Speaker 0: Well, whoopie, I love your confidence. But he said he's thinking about a woman and among them there are 4 black women. Then he picked Kamala and now that she's running, she's being promoted for being a black woman, which is fine. But for a party that doesn't care about her skin color, why does it matter that she's black? And my question to all of you here is, what the hell is a woman?
Speaker 6: You know, I'm I'm very happy Donald Trump is safe. Full stop. Period. And I condemn all forms of political violence.
Speaker 0: Well, Anna, why would you be happy that someone like Trump is safe? Because for years, every single one of you and your friends in the media said Trump is the biggest danger to democracy. You said he's going to take away your freedom. You said he's going to end America if he becomes president again. All of you compared him to Hitler.
So either you're lying when you say you're happy that someone like Hitler is safe, why would you be happy that someone like Hitler is safe? Or you didn't actually believe the things that you said about him. But here's reality, there are people out there who believed when you said Trump is going to take away their freedom. They believed you when you compared him to Hitler, and one of them stepped up and did something about it. So no matter how you look at this, what happened here is on you and your friends in the mainstream media.
And I hope you can reflect, and from now on, make sure to take your emotional outbursts to the mirror and not on TV.
Speaker 6: What really ticks me off about him though is this laughing, Kamala remark.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 6: It's such a sexist remark because a guy I was having I was with over the weekend, a friend of mine, they said Kamala's laughing noise made.
Speaker 7: Let let's face it. The reason he brings up Kamala, the vice president, is because he's afraid of her.
Speaker 0: Well, let let me just Joy, a lot of people find Kamala's laugh which has been described as a cackle by some very annoying. It is what it is. And to point that out is not sexist at all. Just like the way you make fun of Trump when he talks. Notice no one has ever called you a sexist for that.
So if you want to set that as standard, then by your own definition, you too are a sexist. And, Sonny, the only thing that's afraid of Kamala Harris is the English language that comes out of her mouth. That's why it doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 7: But I am comfortable if he made this decision with his inner circle circle, with doctor Jill Biden, with his family Mhmm. And decided to do it on his own.
Speaker 0: Well, Sunny, over the past few weeks, Biden has repeatedly stated that he will not step down. Okay? Now to everyone who's been paying attention, it's pretty obvious that this was not his, but the Democrats' decision. Now, I know that protecting democracy is very important to every single one of you on this show. Okay?
You bring it up every time the name Trump is mentioned. So let me ask you this. Will you be honest and admit that by pushing Biden out and disregarding everyone who voted for him, the party of democracy, your party, just committed a coup and overwrote democracy?
Speaker 7: Tone matters, words matter, but facts matter too. And so if you see behavior or you see policy or you see rhetoric that is inappropriate and improper, I don't think we should be silent about that. Because silence can be complicity. And so I I just think that calling out the truth is not turning up the heat. Right?
And I I Well, thank God there's
Speaker 3: so much tape out there of what rhetoric sounds like.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Whoopi, I actually agree with you. There are at least 4 years of tapes from this show alone comparing Trump and his supporters to Nazis. So you're right. And to your point, Sonny, your boos mean nothing to me.
I have seen you cheer Joe Biden.
Speaker 8: During the pandemic, I was taking so much heat, and I'll never forget hosting a phone call with my colleagues from the Midwest. And one of them said, Gretchen, you're doing all the same things we're doing. You know, trying to keep people safe, but you take so much more crap for it. Why is that? And as the last word landed, he said, wait.
Wait. Wait. Don't answer that. I already know. You're the one woman in this group, and so you're taking a unique kind of heat for it.
It is hard sometimes.
Speaker 0: Wait wait a minute. I think your reasoning there is very silly, to be honest with you. Because reality is you had some of the most restricted rules during COVID to the point that even your own Supreme Court ruled out that some of your actions were illegal and unconstitutional. You also put COVID infected patients in nursing homes and caused thousands of people to die and then you block the release of the data. And let's not forget, you broke your own rules by going to a bar with your friends and having fun while you made it a crime for others to do the same.
So have you considered that maybe those are the reasons why you took so much hit and not because you are
Speaker 7: a woman?
reSee.it AI Summary
I expose and criticize Fake News media in a 16-minute video. Enjoy the takedown! You can also find the video on Rumble for a satirical yet truthful perspective.
@damonimani - Damon Imani
Taking down Fake News media for 16 minutes straight. Sit back and enjoy!
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers engage in a heated discussion covering various topics. They debate Tucker Carlson's interview with Putin, selective memory, Elon Musk, John Cena's attire, censorship, conspiracy theories, climate change, gender roles, trust in the media, immigration, COVID-19 origins, and the consequences of a court ruling on Trump's eligibility. The conversation is filled with insults and accusations, with each speaker defending their own perspective. The transcript is highly opinionated and lacks a neutral tone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The question is, are you just dishonest, or are you getting paid to lie? I think people here are interested to know that.
Speaker 1: I think what's really shocking about this game is the way he kind of just walks right into Moscow and presents himself on a silver platter to the Kremlin, doing the Kremlin's job of misinforming, disinforming the American population.
Speaker 0: Wait a minute. Julia, the only group shocked by what an independent journalist like Tucker is doing is the corrupt establishment propaganda media and activists like you. Now, just like our own politicians, Putin is not an innocent guy. But it's obvious that you're just mad that with the Tucker interview, he will be able to present his side of this story. I mean, the war has gone on for 2 years.
People are dying and y'all only care about sending more taxpayers' money to Ukraine to continue the war, which only causes more people to die. So if you had just a bit of integrity, you would be interested in this interview instead of calling it misinforming and disinforming the American population like a fucking NPC you are.
Speaker 2: Look, I don't care if things are 3 years old. I don't wanna forget. And I think Americans have a very short attention span and we have a very short memory. And I think
Speaker 0: Anna, I actually agree with you on the decreasing attention span. But it's sure interesting that you have all these selective memory options where you choose not to forget about the January 6th while you have forgotten all about the BLM riots. We don't need to remember that. Right? I mean, down the memory hole, when the rioters literally tried to take over the White House to the point that the Secret Service had to move Trump to the White House Bunker.
Do we care about that? Do we need to remember that? How about when the reweight protesters took over the Wisconsin capital? That was as recent as 2023, and you're not Joe Biden, and you can't blame your dementia for forgetting about that one.
Speaker 3: Do you do you feel like Elon Musk is going to get pressed to get in there one way or another?
Speaker 1: Well, it would be good for Elon Musk. That's certainly true. Because you know, he'll have some more trouble in the Biden administration if there's a second Biden administration around a bunch of things. And so Trump would be a savior for him in that regard. Because he would lay off of him and let him continue to do what he's been doing.
Speaker 2: Will he ever put that around?
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. We can't let that one slip. You just said Elon Musk will have troubles if there is a second Biden administration for a bunch of things, and that if Trump wins, he will let him continue doing what he's doing. What is Elon Musk doing aside from running successful companies and not doing anything illegal? Because the only thing that made people like you, the left and the Biden administration change their tone about Elon Musk is that he turned x into a free speech platform.
So to me, what you just said sounds like a threat. It sounds like if Biden wins, he's going to go after Elon Musk because he's providing free speech. Am I wrong for that assumption?
Speaker 3: Karis Fisher, thank you very much.
Speaker 2: Talking about fun moments. I love the John Cena, little moment where, you know, he was which was fun.
Speaker 4: Wearing my
Speaker 5: Who
Speaker 2: could have an issue with him showing up wearing an invitation? You know, that only guy who could look good is like that.
Speaker 0: Rihanna. Heaven and naked men walk on a stage during prime time television that children are most likely watching only happens in a society that has removed morality from itself. Now you call that a fun moment. Some call it degradation of men. Others call it Hollywood humiliation ritual.
I just call it gay. Oh.
Speaker 5: And we have no choice.
Speaker 6: Yeah. Okay. I will say that it is a decision that we revisit constantly in terms of the balance between allowing somebody to knowingly lie on your air about things they've lied about before and you can predict they are going to lie about. And so therefore, it is just it's irresponsible to broadcast.
Speaker 0: Excuse me, Rachel. You sit here every day crying about democracy being in danger. And now you're sitting here, life on air, censoring the presidential nominee, here's what you should do, go fuck yourself.
Speaker 7: What do you think Putin has on Trump?
Speaker 8: Well
Speaker 7: What has he got?
Speaker 9: I actually think that
Speaker 7: Money.
Speaker 8: Donald Trump views himself as a Putin as
Speaker 3: Leader.
Speaker 8: Dictatorial figure.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 8: He said it.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. But, Joy, let me start with you. I have listened to you a lot to the point that I feel bad for my brain cells, and I find it amazing that you always called things that goes against your side conspiracy theories. Yet you sit here and say, Putin has something on Trump. In fact, you've been doing that for years.
And by your own definition, that right there is a conspiracy theory. You are a conspiracy theorist and you should be deplatformed. You're a standard, not mine. And Hakim, Trump kidding me said he wants to be a dictator for one day to close the border. So my question is, why would you take him out of context to promote a false narrative, AKA a conspiracy theory?
Speaker 10: If you wanna do something about it, 2 things I tell everybody. Talk about it. If we were talking about climate change the way we talk about a bunch of other very important issues, we'd be doing something about it, and then the thing to do about it really is to vote. You know? What do we
Speaker 0: mean? The Obamas talk about it, yet they spend $11,000,000 on a beach house, and they don't seem to be concerned about it raising sea levels. Celebrities and politicians, they preach the same message, but they buy multiple houses, cars, and private jets. They don't seem to be concerned. I mean, the banks, they give out 30 years mortgages on houses that according to you will be underwater before they get their money back.
So can you make it make sense?
Speaker 10: We can do this, people. Thank you.
Speaker 1: We can do this.
Speaker 10: I did not break the law.
Speaker 7: Why did would he wanna remember the day that his son died? Why? We're not the the most intelligent maybe in the world, but we're telling you the truth.
Speaker 0: Wait a minute, Joy. I agree with you that y'all are not very intelligent. But saying that you tell the truth is an insult to the word truth. I mean, y'all been sitting here for years saying that Trump is not above the law, Trump is not above the law. Yet, the DOJ just confirmed that Biden actually broke the law, and they didn't even charge him.
So I don't hear you saying Joe Biden is not above the law. Instead, you are making excuses for him. And it's so obvious how dishonest you are. And, again, you just confirm your lack of intelligence. So thank God I'm on this panel to bring you some fucking intelligence.
Speaker 11: He loves to mush a lot of stuff in in what he says, and then his campaign says, oh, he was only joking, or, oh, it was taken out of context. He wasn't talking about violence in the country. I call BS on that. Am I wrong?
Speaker 0: Yes. You are wrong. If you look at the longer version of the video, it becomes pretty clear that he was talking about the automotive industry. In fact, I got a video right here.
Speaker 5: We're gonna put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line. And you
Speaker 11: Yeah. I wish I could
Speaker 7: So there's this clip going viral online of a dozen women being asked the following question. Do we need men? Most answered very quickly, no. So why do you think that is?
Speaker 2: Because men are useless.
Speaker 1: Broadly speaking, I feel like men have proven largely useless, like, I think in the political moments.
Speaker 2: I mean and by the way, I wanna I wanna differentiate between straight men and gay men because I think I would die without gay men.
Speaker 0: Excuse me. I gotta The ABC network, which is hosting this show, would have canceled the show if it were a panel of men saying that women are useless. I see the producer right there. I wonder what you think about this one. Y'all would have called them misogynists, and the media would have destroyed the lives of those men.
That's something to reflect on. And aside from that, everything you just said were emotional responses, but that's to be expected from a low IQ panel.
Speaker 12: Trust has been eroding in recent years, which is why this week's meeting on rebuilding trust has been so important.
Speaker 0: Rebuilding trust with whom exactly? I'm sorry. I'm a let you finish. But here's the thing. As far as the public opinion is concerned, they don't trust you and they never will because they didn't elect you.
And here's the thing, while we edit, Epstein didn't kill himself and there are probably people in this very forum who were clients of
Speaker 1: Seemingly, this is a world filled with no women. If you look at the way tech is, you have to imagine, I guess, straight white men are the only people who are intelligent in this world. Like, right? Like, that can't be, and it isn't true. Yeah.
And they need diversity.
Speaker 0: Excuse me, Cara. I'm amazed how we just put all that on a straight white man, but that's okay because you're a lesbian white woman. So, of course, you would let that overshadow your logic. Because here's the thing, while societal expectations and biases may play a role, they're not sole determinants of career outcomes. Because here's the reality.
Are you ready? There is psychological and biological differences between men and women that affects their interest and priorities leading them to pursue different career paths. On average, women may be more inclined towards people oriented professions, while men may lean towards technical or object oriented domains often associated with STEM fields like technology. And that's not an opinion. That's just years of research and has nothing to do with a straight white man.
Now what you think about that?
Speaker 13: The real threat here is the one you identified just now, and that is Donald Trump, who says there's a problem at the border, but he wants that problem to get worse, to continue to be a problem so that he can run on it next November. This is a man who puts himself first and puts the United States of America way behind.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. That's called running for president. So you look at your opponent and the horrible job he's doing protecting the country or the economy. I think we all agree it's not doing very well. Then you run on those issues.
It's very that simple. So Pocahontas here said a lot of words and still managed to make no sense at all.
Speaker 1: Senator Elizabeth Warren, thank you for your time.
Speaker 13: You bet. Sarah?
Speaker 1: Like he used him as his puppet and it exposed what many of us have been saying about Tucker Carlson. He's a Kremlin puppet who doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. It's just such a disgrace, I think, to our country that an American would give him any kind of platform to propaganda
Speaker 0: action. If I may, I'm amazed at the level of self projection going on here. I mean, Alicia, you work for ABC. Tucker works for himself. Objectively, you are a puppet, and he's not.
And, Sonny, you're basically saying that Tucker shouldn't be allowed to have a voice. That's the opposite of the democracy that you preach every time we are here. And finally, none of you had any examples on what Tucker has said that was a lie or propaganda. But I'm too nice, so I will give you another chance. Give me some specific examples to back your claims.
Let's go.
Speaker 5: Closing remarks there from attorney general James. Now that we've wrapped here in court today, how strong do you think the case is, and do you expect this judge to go all the way up, to the 300,000,000 mark, in the in the fine?
Speaker 0: Ari, before we get to this obvious witch hunt, let me give you some actual news. So according to the White House visitor locks, we now know that Leticia James visited Joe Biden's White House 3 times while investigating Donald Trump. Now would you say that Joe Biden is a danger to our democracy forcluding with a prosecutor to take down his opponent, or are you just a dishonest piece of poo?
Speaker 1: The thing that I I I really think people need to understand about immigration, it's not a crisis. And the other part about immigration is it's not the problem that Republicans say it is. They say that immigrants run up crime. That is not true, and it hasn't been true for a 140 years.
Speaker 0: Sunny, I like the way you gaslight your audience by using the word immigration instead of illegal immigration. When you know, Dan Will, that the country is in a crisis when it comes to illegal immigrants. Then you make a strawman argument by saying that they say that immigrants run up crime when that hasn't been true for a 140 years. Then you pat yourself on a bat. Now, the question is, are you just dishonest or are you getting paid to lie?
I think people here are interested to know that.
Speaker 12: We continue to call on governments to maintain surveillance and sequencing for their populations to be vaccinated, to wear masks.
Speaker 0: But I think it's time for you and the World Health Organization to tell the people the truth. Tell them that COVID came from a Chinese lab. Tell them that you're hiding it from the people. Tell them what you're working on. Disease x, what is that about?
Tell them that a corrupt big pharma doesn't care about people's health. They only care about selling the back.
Speaker 1: And the judge kept on imploring his his attorneys, control your client, and they could not. Someone like that that that lacks impulse control should be nowhere near nuclear numbers. Right? So the
Speaker 0: nuclear talking points aren't really holding up and if you had a sense of reality which you don't, you would have seen that. Because here's the reality, Under 4 years of Donald Trump, there were 0 new wars but the moment your guy, Joe Biden, took office, this country has actively supported or engaged in 3 new wars. That's the Ukraine war, Hamas Israel war and we just started bombing Yemen. So, again, 0 wars under Donald Trump, 3 new ongoing wars under Joe Biden. So, don't talk to me about Trump's temperament and the nuclear codes because you don't know what you're talking about and respectfully you sound very dumb.
Speaker 4: What do you think would be the consequences for our country if this court rules that somebody who egged on an insurrection, that was an insurrection for him to remain in office, remains on the ballot? If they rule that he can stage a coup and then run again, what do you think the consequences of that will be?
Speaker 0: Well, the consequences will be that, firstly, of course, the voice of the people will be heard and they get to choose their president. And secondly, on the night of election, if or probably when he wins, people will get to watch you and lying Schiff here cry life on air like the little bitches you are.
Speaker 4: Congressman Adam Schiff, thank you for your time. Much appreciated.
Speaker 0: And I appreciate the World Economic Forum providing me the opportunity to be on this stage and say, fuck you Klaus Schwab and fuck your new world order. We, the people, were born free. We will stay free and you and all of your global friends, including everyone in this room, can go fuck you,
@damonimani - Damon Imani
Satire but true. This video is also available on Rumble here: https://rumble.com/v4lhz16-damon-imani-taking-down-fake-news-media-for-16-minutes-straight-vol.2.html?playlist_id=O2YNb6tMzlM
Damon Imani Taking Down Fake News Media For 16 Minutes Straight! Vol.2
Compilation of Damon Imani taking on mainstream media. Volume.2 - Q1 2024. Subscribe, like, comment and share, that really helps! - Satire but true. - Stay connected other platforms: X (Twitter): www.
rumble.com
@damonimani - Damon Imani
Taking down Fake News media for 16 minutes straight. Sit back and enjoy! https://t.co/RA50iPd2xJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video features a heated discussion on various topics. The speakers engage in arguments about Tucker Carlson's interview with Putin, selective memory, Elon Musk, John Cena, climate change, men's usefulness, trust in the government, immigration, COVID origins, and the consequences of a court ruling. The conversation is filled with personal attacks and strong language.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The question is, are you just dishonest, or are you getting paid to lie? I think people here are interested to know that.
Speaker 1: I think what's really shocking about this game is the way he kind of just walks right into Moscow and presents himself on a silver platter to the Kremlin, doing the Kremlin's job of misinforming, disinforming the American population.
Speaker 0: Wait a minute. Julia, the only group shocked by what an independent journalist like Tucker is doing is the corrupt establishment propaganda media and activists like you. Now, just like our own politicians, Putin is not an innocent guy. But it's obvious that you're just mad that with the Tucker interview, he will be able to present his side of this story. I mean, the war has gone on for 2 years.
People are dying and y'all only care about sending more taxpayers' money to Ukraine to continue the war, which only causes more people to die. So if you had just a bit of integrity, you would be interested in this interview instead of calling it misinforming and disinforming the American population like a fucking NPC you are.
Speaker 2: Look, I don't care if things are 3 years old. I don't wanna forget. And I think Americans have a very short attention span and we have a very short memory. And I think
Speaker 0: Anna, I actually agree with you on the decreasing attention span. But it's sure interesting that you have all these selective memory options where you choose not to forget about the January 6th while you have forgotten all about the BLM riots. We don't need to remember that. Right? I mean, down the memory hole, when the rioters literally tried to take over the White House to the point that the Secret Service had to move Trump to the White House Bunker.
Do we care about that? Do we need to remember that? How about when the reweight protesters took over the Wisconsin capital? That was as recent as 2023, and you're not Joe Biden, and you can't blame your dementia for forgetting about that one.
Speaker 3: Do you do you feel like Elon Musk is going to get pressed to get in there one way or another?
Speaker 1: Well, it would be good for Elon Musk. That's certainly true. Because you know, he'll have some more trouble in the Biden administration if there's a second Biden administration around a bunch of things. And so Trump would be a savior for him in that regard. Because he would lay off of him and let him continue to do what he's been doing.
Speaker 2: Will he ever put that around?
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. We can't let that one slip. You just said Elon Musk will have troubles if there is a second Biden administration for a bunch of things, and that if Trump wins, he will let him continue doing what he's doing. What is Elon Musk doing aside from running successful companies and not doing anything illegal? Because the only thing that made people like you, the left and the Biden administration change their tone about Elon Musk is that he turned x into a free speech platform.
So to me, what you just said sounds like a threat. It sounds like if Biden wins, he's going to go after Elon Musk because he's providing free speech. Am I wrong for that assumption?
Speaker 3: Karis Fisher, thank you very much.
Speaker 2: Talking about fun moments. I love the John Cena, little moment where, you know, he was which was fun.
Speaker 4: Wearing my
Speaker 5: Who
Speaker 2: could have an issue with him showing up wearing an invitation? You know, that only guy who could look good is like that.
Speaker 0: Rihanna. Heaven and naked men walk on a stage during prime time television that children are most likely watching only happens in a society that has removed morality from itself. Now you call that a fun moment. Some call it degradation of men. Others call it Hollywood humiliation ritual.
I just call it gay. Oh.
Speaker 5: And we have no choice.
Speaker 6: Yeah. Okay. I will say that it is a decision that we revisit constantly in terms of the balance between allowing somebody to knowingly lie on your air about things they've lied about before and you can predict they are going to lie about. And so therefore, it is just it's irresponsible to broadcast.
Speaker 0: Excuse me, Rachel. You sit here every day crying about democracy being in danger. And now you're sitting here, life on air, censoring the presidential nominee, here's what you should do, go fuck yourself.
Speaker 7: What do you think Putin has on Trump?
Speaker 8: Well
Speaker 7: What has he got?
Speaker 9: I actually think that
Speaker 7: Money.
Speaker 8: Donald Trump views himself as a Putin as
Speaker 3: Leader.
Speaker 8: Dictatorial figure.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 8: He said it.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. But, Joy, let me start with you. I have listened to you a lot to the point that I feel bad for my brain cells, and I find it amazing that you always called things that goes against your side conspiracy theories. Yet you sit here and say, Putin has something on Trump. In fact, you've been doing that for years.
And by your own definition, that right there is a conspiracy theory. You are a conspiracy theorist and you should be deplatformed. You're a standard, not mine. And Hakim, Trump kidding me said he wants to be a dictator for one day to close the border. So my question is, why would you take him out of context to promote a false narrative, AKA a conspiracy theory?
Speaker 10: If you wanna do something about it, 2 things I tell everybody. Talk about it. If we were talking about climate change the way we talk about a bunch of other very important issues, we'd be doing something about it, and then the thing to do about it really is to vote. You know? What do we
Speaker 0: mean? The Obamas talk about it, yet they spend $11,000,000 on a beach house, and they don't seem to be concerned about it raising sea levels. Celebrities and politicians, they preach the same message, but they buy multiple houses, cars, and private jets. They don't seem to be concerned. I mean, the banks, they give out 30 years mortgages on houses that according to you will be underwater before they get their money back.
So can you make it make sense?
Speaker 10: We can do this, people. Thank you.
Speaker 1: We can do this.
Speaker 10: I did not break the law.
Speaker 7: Why did would he wanna remember the day that his son died? Why? We're not the the most intelligent maybe in the world, but we're telling you the truth.
Speaker 0: Wait a minute, Joy. I agree with you that y'all are not very intelligent. But saying that you tell the truth is an insult to the word truth. I mean, y'all been sitting here for years saying that Trump is not above the law, Trump is not above the law. Yet, the DOJ just confirmed that Biden actually broke the law, and they didn't even charge him.
So I don't hear you saying Joe Biden is not above the law. Instead, you are making excuses for him. And it's so obvious how dishonest you are. And, again, you just confirm your lack of intelligence. So thank God I'm on this panel to bring you some fucking intelligence.
Speaker 11: He loves to mush a lot of stuff in in what he says, and then his campaign says, oh, he was only joking, or, oh, it was taken out of context. He wasn't talking about violence in the country. I call BS on that. Am I wrong?
Speaker 0: Yes. You are wrong. If you look at the longer version of the video, it becomes pretty clear that he was talking about the automotive industry. In fact, I got a video right here.
Speaker 5: We're gonna put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line. And you
Speaker 11: Yeah. I wish I could
Speaker 7: So there's this clip going viral online of a dozen women being asked the following question. Do we need men? Most answered very quickly, no. So why do you think that is?
Speaker 2: Because men are useless.
Speaker 1: Broadly speaking, I feel like men have proven largely useless, like, I think in the political moments.
Speaker 2: I mean and by the way, I wanna I wanna differentiate between straight men and gay men because I think I would die without gay men.
Speaker 0: Excuse me. I gotta The ABC network, which is hosting this show, would have canceled the show if it were a panel of men saying that women are useless. I see the producer right there. I wonder what you think about this one. Y'all would have called them misogynists, and the media would have destroyed the lives of those men.
That's something to reflect on. And aside from that, everything you just said were emotional responses, but that's to be expected from a low IQ panel.
Speaker 12: Trust has been eroding in recent years, which is why this week's meeting on rebuilding trust has been so important.
Speaker 0: Rebuilding trust with whom exactly? I'm sorry. I'm a let you finish. But here's the thing. As far as the public opinion is concerned, they don't trust you and they never will because they didn't elect you.
And here's the thing, while we edit, Epstein didn't kill himself and there are probably people in this very forum who were clients of
Speaker 1: Seemingly, this is a world filled with no women. If you look at the way tech is, you have to imagine, I guess, straight white men are the only people who are intelligent in this world. Like, right? Like, that can't be, and it isn't true. Yeah.
And they need diversity.
Speaker 0: Excuse me, Cara. I'm amazed how we just put all that on a straight white man, but that's okay because you're a lesbian white woman. So, of course, you would let that overshadow your logic. Because here's the thing, while societal expectations and biases may play a role, they're not sole determinants of career outcomes. Because here's the reality.
Are you ready? There is psychological and biological differences between men and women that affects their interest and priorities leading them to pursue different career paths. On average, women may be more inclined towards people oriented professions, while men may lean towards technical or object oriented domains often associated with STEM fields like technology. And that's not an opinion. That's just years of research and has nothing to do with a straight white man.
Now what you think about that?
Speaker 13: The real threat here is the one you identified just now, and that is Donald Trump, who says there's a problem at the border, but he wants that problem to get worse, to continue to be a problem so that he can run on it next November. This is a man who puts himself first and puts the United States of America way behind.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. That's called running for president. So you look at your opponent and the horrible job he's doing protecting the country or the economy. I think we all agree it's not doing very well. Then you run on those issues.
It's very that simple. So Pocahontas here said a lot of words and still managed to make no sense at all.
Speaker 1: Senator Elizabeth Warren, thank you for your time.
Speaker 13: You bet. Sarah?
Speaker 1: Like he used him as his puppet and it exposed what many of us have been saying about Tucker Carlson. He's a Kremlin puppet who doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. It's just such a disgrace, I think, to our country that an American would give him any kind of platform to propaganda
Speaker 0: action. If I may, I'm amazed at the level of self projection going on here. I mean, Alicia, you work for ABC. Tucker works for himself. Objectively, you are a puppet, and he's not.
And, Sonny, you're basically saying that Tucker shouldn't be allowed to have a voice. That's the opposite of the democracy that you preach every time we are here. And finally, none of you had any examples on what Tucker has said that was a lie or propaganda. But I'm too nice, so I will give you another chance. Give me some specific examples to back your claims.
Let's go.
Speaker 5: Closing remarks there from attorney general James. Now that we've wrapped here in court today, how strong do you think the case is, and do you expect this judge to go all the way up, to the 300,000,000 mark, in the in the fine?
Speaker 0: Ari, before we get to this obvious witch hunt, let me give you some actual news. So according to the White House visitor locks, we now know that Leticia James visited Joe Biden's White House 3 times while investigating Donald Trump. Now would you say that Joe Biden is a danger to our democracy forcluding with a prosecutor to take down his opponent, or are you just a dishonest piece of poo?
Speaker 1: The thing that I I I really think people need to understand about immigration, it's not a crisis. And the other part about immigration is it's not the problem that Republicans say it is. They say that immigrants run up crime. That is not true, and it hasn't been true for a 140 years.
Speaker 0: Sunny, I like the way you gaslight your audience by using the word immigration instead of illegal immigration. When you know, Dan Will, that the country is in a crisis when it comes to illegal immigrants. Then you make a strawman argument by saying that they say that immigrants run up crime when that hasn't been true for a 140 years. Then you pat yourself on a bat. Now, the question is, are you just dishonest or are you getting paid to lie?
I think people here are interested to know that.
Speaker 12: We continue to call on governments to maintain surveillance and sequencing for their populations to be vaccinated, to wear masks.
Speaker 0: But I think it's time for you and the World Health Organization to tell the people the truth. Tell them that COVID came from a Chinese lab. Tell them that you're hiding it from the people. Tell them what you're working on. Disease x, what is that about?
Tell them that a corrupt big pharma doesn't care about people's health. They only care about selling the back.
Speaker 1: And the judge kept on imploring his his attorneys, control your client, and they could not. Someone like that that that lacks impulse control should be nowhere near nuclear numbers. Right? So the
Speaker 0: nuclear talking points aren't really holding up and if you had a sense of reality which you don't, you would have seen that. Because here's the reality, Under 4 years of Donald Trump, there were 0 new wars but the moment your guy, Joe Biden, took office, this country has actively supported or engaged in 3 new wars. That's the Ukraine war, Hamas Israel war and we just started bombing Yemen. So, again, 0 wars under Donald Trump, 3 new ongoing wars under Joe Biden. So, don't talk to me about Trump's temperament and the nuclear codes because you don't know what you're talking about and respectfully you sound very dumb.
Speaker 4: What do you think would be the consequences for our country if this court rules that somebody who egged on an insurrection, that was an insurrection for him to remain in office, remains on the ballot? If they rule that he can stage a coup and then run again, what do you think the consequences of that will be?
Speaker 0: Well, the consequences will be that, firstly, of course, the voice of the people will be heard and they get to choose their president. And secondly, on the night of election, if or probably when he wins, people will get to watch you and lying Schiff here cry life on air like the little bitches you are.
Speaker 4: Congressman Adam Schiff, thank you for your time. Much appreciated.
Speaker 0: And I appreciate the World Economic Forum providing me the opportunity to be on this stage and say, fuck you Klaus Schwab and fuck your new world order. We, the people, were born free. We will stay free and you and all of your global friends, including everyone in this room, can go fuck you,
