TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @davidicke

Saved - February 21, 2026 at 8:17 AM

@davidicke - David Icke

Erik Prince, the founder of notorious 'private army' Blackwater, is all over the 'alternative' media 'revealing' old news that Big Tech is taking your data. What is not mentioned is that he's flogging a 'secure phone' designed in Israel. Problem-Reaction-Solution. He claims that his phone could have stopped the Hamas attack on October 7th without any mention that the attack was allowed to happen by the Israeli government and military to 'justify' the slaughter in Gaza or that Hamas was created with the support of the Israeli government. https://theintercept.com/2024/01/24/erik-prince-phone-hamas/

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

Breaking! Tucker Carlson and Erik Prince Expose The Secret Life of Cell Phones https://drjonesnaturals.com https://infowarsstore.com https://t.co/XkPxHco3bg

Video Transcript AI Summary
Eric Prince and Tucker Carlson discuss what they describe as pervasive, ongoing phone and device surveillance. They say that a study of devices—including Google Mobile Services on Android and iPhones—shows a spike in data leaving the phone around 3 AM, amounting to about 50 megabytes, effectively the phone “dialing home to the mother ship” and exporting “all of your goings on.” They describe “pillow talk” and other private interactions being transmitted, and claim that even apps like WhatsApp, which is marketed as end-to-end encrypted, ultimately have data that is “sliced and diced and analyzed and used to push … advertising” once it passes through servers. They argue that this surveillance is not limited to phones but extends to other devices in the home, including Amazon’s Alexa and automobiles, which they say now have trackers and can trigger a kill switch, with recording of audio and, in many cases, video. The speakers contend this situation represents a monopoly by a handful of big tech companies that can use the collected data to control markets, dominate, and vertically integrate the economy, potentially shutting down competitors. They connect this to broader concerns about political power, claiming that the data profiles built on individuals enable manipulation of public opinion, messaging, and even election outcomes. They reference banking data, noting that banks like Chase have announced selling customers’ purchasing histories to other companies, as part of what they call a broader data-driven power shift. The discussion expands to warnings about a “technological breakaway civilization” operating illegally and interfaced with private intelligence agencies to manipulate, censor, and steal elections. They argue that AI, capable of trillions of calculations per second, magnifies these risks and increases the ability to take control of civilization. They reference geopolitical events, such as China’s blockade of Taiwan, and claim that microchips sold internationally have kill switches that could disable critical military and infrastructure. They speculate about the capabilities of NSA, Chinese, Russian, or hacker groups to exploit this vulnerability, describing a world in which the infrastructure is exposed like Swiss cheese to criminals and governments. Throughout, the speakers criticize the idea that technology is neutral, asserting instead that it has been hijacked by corrupt governments and corporations. They contrast these concerns with Google’s founding motto “don’t be evil,” claiming it was contradicted by later documents showing CIA involvement and In-Q-Tel’s role, and they warn that a social-credit, cashless society rollout could be enforced by private devices rather than drones or troops. The segment emphasizes education of Congress, state attorneys general, and the public about these supposed threats. Note: Promotional product endorsements and sponsor requests in the transcript have been omitted from this summary.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Your cell phone isn't just watching and listening to you. It's doing a lot more than that. And we're about to break down the secrets they hope you never learn. Speaker 1: Well, we've been doing a study following our device, a Google mobile services phone, any Android running Google mobile services, which is all of them, or an iPhone. And about 3AM, we're seeing a spike of data leaving the phone, by 50 megabytes. That is basically that phone dialing home to the mother ship, exporting all of your goings on. Speaker 2: All your pillow talk is going to Speaker 1: Pillow talk, whatever. Speaker 2: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Infowars.com forward slash go. Speaker 0: Eric Prince recently sat down with Tucker Carlson and exposed the fact that his security slash military company did an internal study of iPhones, Androids and found that all of them in the middle of the night were transmitting large packets of information back to their home companies, back to the mother ship. Now decades ago, I showed you industry documents had whistleblowers on that indeed cell phones, even when they're off, are recording the audio and transferring it over to a text document to be sent back to the telecommunication companies and big tech. But it's not just the cell phone itself that's doing this, it's being sent back through the apps and print singles out Mark Zuckerberg who's probably the worst offender out there, but this is going on across the board. Look at Amazon and the Alexa that for more than a decade people have brought into their homes. But it's also your automobiles and now by law all automobiles sold in The United States have tracker systems in them that can also trigger a kill switch in your car and are also recording audio and in many cases recording video. Now Prince hits the key here and so does Carlson. They make the point that this is a monopoly, a monopoly of a handful of big tech companies that can use this information to take control of markets and dominate and vertically integrate the economy shutting down all of their competition. And that's just on the economic side. Think of the political power that is there to be able to gauge and manipulate the minds of the population because each man, woman, and child in the Western world who's around these quote smart devices that are spying on us is having giant profiles built on us and that data is being sold. Just a few weeks ago, big banks in The United States like Chase announced, hey, we're selling our customers purchasing history to other companies. That's just the tip of the iceberg. This is a whole technological breakaway civilization that is operating completely illegally and interfaced with private intelligence agencies to manipulate, censor, and steal elections. We've got to educate Congress about this. We've got to educate the state attorney generals about this. We've got to educate the military and the public about this because this is a security threat to all of our civilization. Now in the past, this data was crunched by computers and was used in algorithms. But now with AI that can do trillions of calculations a second, they are able to do even more with this and take full control of civilization. Just last week when China did a blockade of Taiwan and flew loaded planes with bombs over them in a simulated attack, what did Taiwan threaten to do, the main chipmaker in the world? They came out and announced, hey, for decades we've been putting kill switches in all the microchips that we sold to China and others and if you keep messing with us we'll kill the microchips in most of your military equipment and your dams and your highways. Think of what the NSA or the communist Chinese or the Taiwanese or the Russians or hacker groups can do with this. This doesn't give us redundancy. This doesn't give us security. This gives us a world that's like Swiss cheese for hackers and criminal groups and governments and corporations to do whatever they want. When I would tell people that your phones are listening to you decades ago, people laughed at me even though I had the documents. Then they roll out all these home assistants and people say, oh, so what? I trust them. And then we now learn that the police have been listening to people over these systems. Ladies and gentlemen, this is going to end up bringing down civilization. We have to educate the public and we have to bring in controls now. And we have to realize that technology itself is not evil, but it has all been Trojan horsed by corrupt governments and corporations to make it evil. And the infrastructure that we live in today is the opposite of what Google said in their founding documents twenty five years ago, don't be evil. Because from day one, they had been evil and were set up by In Q Tel and the CIA. And more documents just came out two days ago that indeed the CIA has been in a process of taking over all the social media and targeting the American people. We have rogue corporations and governments teamed up playing God, waging war on the economy, cutting off energy, cutting off fertilizer, cutting off food to create a global meltdown so they can offer their solution. The public rollout of this cashless society social credit score enforced not by drones in the sky or army tanks on the ground, but by the devices that run and control our lives. Here's Eric Prince with the great Tucker Carlson. I hope you share this video, and I hope you educate yourself and others around you because this is the most important thing happening in our world today. And when they roll out the next viral scare, whether it's bird flu or something else, the UN treaty openly states they're gonna lock us on our houses and turn off our cars and turn off our phones if we don't submit. Australia is the test case, and it's happening now. If you wanna live like the communist Chinese slaves in China, you're about to be living like them unless we stand up as a population and a people and go into these big tech companies and break up these trusts and outlaw this crap now. Bill Gates had Microsoft broken up twenty something years ago for simply running a software monopoly. This is a trillion times worse. I'm Alex Jones. This is the info war. Please follow me in X. Now, here is Eric Prince and the great Tucker Carlson. Speaker 1: I've had so many people I've talked to about they said, was talking to my wife about needing a new mattress in our bedroom. The next day, they're getting advertising for mattresses, which means the camera or the phone was listening to them in their bedroom with all the follow on conclusions to be drawn from that. Speaker 2: Yeah. Given what happens in healthy bedrooms, that's a I mean, what happens to those recordings? Speaker 1: Well, we've been doing a study following our device, a Google mobile services phone, any Android running Google mobile services, which is all of them, or an iPhone. And about 3AM, we're seeing a spike of data leaving the phone, about 50 megabytes. That is basically that phone dialing home to the mother ship, exporting all of your goings on. Speaker 2: All your pillow talk is going to Speaker 1: Pillow talk, whatever. Right? It it it so Zuckerberg paid $20,000,000,000 for WhatsApp. Why? Because every message, call, video, picture, voice note, everything that goes through there, they say, well, it's end to end encrypted. Yeah. It's end to end until it passes through their server where it's sliced and diced and analyzed and used to push used to sell advertising to that customer. If you're not paying for something, you're not the customer, you are the product. So if you wanna get well, I think people people right now are used to Mark Zuckerberg listening from their nightstand every night. Because that's effectively what what your phone like Speaker 2: the creepiest person in world history if he's listening to what's going on in your bedroom. Speaker 1: Because they're able, as big tech, to shape that message. That's that's the frightening thing about the power of big tech and their ability to to influence what you watch, what you think about candidates. If you search something, how they how they score those rankings, it's a it is shocking. We have an antitrust problem here in America, vastly worse than in the early nineteen late eighteen hundreds, early nineteen hundreds with oil and railways Yeah. This is not sugar Speaker 2: rush. This is more important. Speaker 1: Yeah. This is literally how we communicate, interact with other human beings in our lives. How we gather and and and share information about the realities of life, of food, of medicine, of vaccines, of healthcare issues, of of truth. And so, it's and especially in an era of AI, it's scary stuff. The average kid in America, by the time they reach the age of 13, has had 72,000,000 data points collected on them by big tech. So so it's almost like that that much collection allows digital grooming by big tech to to share and to shape your preferences, how you interact, etcetera. Speaker 2: Your sexual preferences. I mean, if we're being honest here. Yeah. Exactly. Considering that young people are introduced to sexuality through pornography. Yep. Yeah. Given that there's no privacy, it's probably pretty dumb to watch porn. Speaker 0: Again, this has been going on for decades. It's getting worse by the day. It's all completely illegal. Congress must act. The governors must act. The legislatures must act. The senate attorney generals must act now because this is a big tech private intelligence agency takeover the world. We'll be reporting more on this edX at RealAlexJones. Please follow me there. To keep my broadcast on air, it is more critical than ever that you support our sponsors. And many of the great products been available for years at infowarstour.com are no longer available there. They're exclusively available at doctorjonesnaturals.com. The URL is below on screen. All of the patented nano silver products like the toothpaste and the wound gel and the immune gargle are there at doctorjonesnaturals.com. And many other amazing products like a super high quality organic multivitamin, next level foundational energy, Cava Chill, Rocket Rest, Top Brain, the list goes on and on. Please visit doctorjonesnaturals.com today or visit the link below and support the broadcast while getting amazing products at the same time. Thank you so much for your past support and I'm encouraging you now to go to doctor jones naturals dot com. It's critical to keeping my broadcast on the air plus their amazing products. Thank you for your support. Now please take action by going to doctorjonesnaturals.com today and checking out the amazing products. Speaker 2: What did he just say? He said there's a storm coming in. I know. Speaker 3: We told you what was going to happen, and it did. Now we're telling you what's coming at Real Alex Jones on X.
Saved - February 12, 2026 at 1:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I show that hijacking attention hijacks the population’s sense of reality; the question “who is doing it?” has an answer: an other-dimensional force I’ve exposed for decades, acting through a Global Cult of interlocking secret societies that generate the human drama to capture ATTENTION.

@davidicke - David Icke

This is how it's done - hijack ATTENTION and you hijack the population's sense of reality. Gotcha. The unanswered question at the end here of 'who is doing it?' does have an answer. It is the other-dimensional force I have been exposing for decades working through the Global Cult of interlocking secret societies constantly generating the human rollercoaster 'drama' that captures ATTENTION.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that certain people are deliberately trying to fool us into believing that movies and other media are real in order to enslave humanity. They define slavery not simply as using force with a gun, but as a process in which energy comes from our attention, and the goal is to capture that attention to control reality. In this view, attention is energy, and those who can focus our attention can construct the reality we experience, making it their own. Consequently, we watch movies, use the Internet, and engage with technologies like artificial intelligence because these tools are part of a system designed to enslave the mind by shaping perceived reality. The speaker asserts that reality is defined by what we imagine, and imagination is the animating force of the universe. If others can capture and direct our attention, they can create their preferred reality, effectively enslaving us through our beliefs and perceptions. They claim this is why we consume media and why schools promote artificial intelligence: to further enslave us. The broader claim is that all of human history centers on enslavement, and progress itself is framed as a form of enslavement rather than genuine liberation. There is a progression described where new capabilities—watching movies, having social media, communicating with others, and using AI like ChatGPT—appear as advancements but are presented as mechanisms to control our minds. The speaker emphasizes that we are given access to technologies and information that can be used to enslave, not liberate, and that these developments encourage belief in a false or manipulated reality. The ultimate message is that by convincing people that the current reality is the only true reality, those in control can maintain power over them. Toward the end, the speaker raises a question about the identity of the enforcers, asking, “Who are these people?” but concedes that they do not know who they are. The overall claim remains that the purpose behind movies, the Internet, schools, and artificial intelligence is to enslave the human mind by manipulating perceived reality, with reality itself being shaped by what people imagine and believe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the question then is, why are these people making this effort to fool us into believing that this wall, these movies are real? And the answer is because they're trying to enslave us. Okay? Slavery. But then you're like, okay. Slavery means that I take a gun and I say, if you don't do what I say, I'll kill you. But that's not slavery is. If the conch if the universe is conscious, okay, our energy comes from our attention. Attention is energy. So what they want is our energy. Okay? That's true wealth. If they're able to focus our energy, capture imagination, they can construct reality in the way that they want it. Okay? Because reality is what we imagine it to The imagination is the animating force of the universe. Right? So if they can focus our attention, for us, they can create their own reality. Alright? Now we understand why we watch movies. Now we understand why we have the Internet. Now we understand why the school wants you to love artificial intelligence because it's to enslave you. It's all of human history is about enslavement. Okay? That's what progress is. You think that, oh my god. I can now watch movies. Oh my god. I have now social media. I can communicate with anyone. Oh my god. I chat GBT. I try to think you tell me the truth about the world. No. All these things are created to enslave your mind because you have access to God. And so what they're trying to do is trick you into believing that this reality is a true reality. Because once you believe that, this reality becomes the only reality. Okay? So the question is like, who are these people? Well, we don't know. Okay?
Saved - February 1, 2026 at 8:23 AM

@davidicke - David Icke

What this lady and organisation are saying and trying to sell you is absolute bollocks. Kevin Warsh, like his father in law, World Jewish Congress chief Ronald Lauder, is an ultra-Zionist Israel-firster taking control of the US economy in the mould of ultra-Zionist predecessors Alan Greenspan. Ben Bernanke, Janet Yellen, and Rothschild gofer Paul Volcker. Israel absolutely owns Trump, but the nonsense pedalled by 'Promethean Action' seeks to sell you the utter claptrap that Trump is leading the way with Soros operative Scott Bessent to 'stop the globalists' when they are both assets of the 'globalists'. The narrative claimed here is so breathtakingly ridiculous you wonder what the motivation must be.

@PrometheanActn - Promethean Action

JUST DROPPED: Trump vs. Wall Street Kevin Warsh just declared "regime change" at the Fed. Jamieson Greer invoked Hamilton at Davos. $18 trillion flowing to Main Street. The Republican New Deal isn't a slogan—it's happening. The globalists are terrified. 👇 WATCH https://t.co/AjuM9RONPm

Video Transcript AI Summary
London and Wall Street are in a total panic today because their era of free money for the elites is over. Kevin Warsh is president Trump's new pick for the Fed, and this is about much more than interest rates. It marks the beginning of what president Trump is calling a Republican new deal. Their proposal was to raise taxes very substantially. And our proposal, which is in the great, big, beautiful new deal. It's a new deal in its own way. It's a republican version of the new deal. Right behind you is a nice picture of FDR. This is a much better deal than the FDR deal. Warsh didn’t just accept the nomination; he declared war on the globalist economic model. He explicitly said that the Fed must abandon the dogma that paying workers causes inflation. He’s calling out the real culprit, money printing and Wall Street bailouts. This follows Ambassador Jamieson Greer’s shockwave speech in Davos last week, where he dusted off Alexander Hamilton to tell the elites, your system is over. Susan Kokinda explains that since the mid 1970s she’s tracked the war between the American system and the British empire. The show will cover why the globalists fear a Republican new deal, and what the real content of president Trump’s Republican new deal is. Mainstream media coverage of Warsh has been restrained, but The Atlantic Council worries that Warsh and treasury secretary Besant are in sync in their attacks on how the Fed has saved Wall Street at the expense of Main Street. The Atlantic Council’s lead international economist says Walsh believes the Fed has distorted the healthy functioning of the US economy through injections of money into the market, helped assets on Wall Street at the expense of Main Street, and taken on the role of implementing fiscal policy. Treasury secretary Besant agrees with that assessment. CNBC headlines also frame Warsh as touting regime change at the Fed. The CFR and Mark Carney offer mixed responses, with some consoling that Warsh won’t revolutionize the Fed, while others praise him. The key is not just interest rates in isolation. The CNBC headline’s other part notes a partnership with the treasury. Warsh has stated in 2010 that the Fed’s financial stability responsibilities should not give license to central bankers to be emergency capital providers; capital allocation should reside with the fiscal authority and its fiscal agent, the Department of Treasury. This frames the fight as two centuries of struggle between the American system of Alexander Hamilton and the British imperial system. Prominent Davos moments included Trump and Commerce Secretary Lutnick telling elites that globalism had failed; Scott Beson’s takedowns of Gavin Newsom; and Jameson Greer’s Hamiltonian economic system speech, which quotes Hamilton’s 1791 Report on Manufacturers advocating tariffs and subsidies to incentivize industrialization to promote an America competitive with foreign producers. Greer’s speech is framed as the resurrection of the American system. Trump’s cabinet meeting is presented as focusing on workers, production, and Main Street, with tariffs and deregulation fueling manufacturing restarts. John Deere announced two new large plants in Indiana and North Carolina; one will build excavating equipment, relocating from Japan due to tariffs. A graphite processing plant in New York is described as the first in seventy years. Secretary Beson claims the US produced more steel than Japan for the first time in twenty-six years, driven by tariffs; there are other factory restarts and a supposed “golden age” for the economy. The narrative concludes that the empire fears an American system revival and that the fight is out in the open. The modern British empire is panicking because the fight is visible, with globalists asserting Main Street, not Wall Street. The piece frames Warsh’s nomination as a declaration of war on the Wall Street bailout machine and a direct challenge to decades of central banking independence, with Davos heralding the Hamiltonian revival and Trump’s Republican new deal delivering production for workers, not bailouts for banks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: London and Wall Street are in a total panic today. Why? Because their era of free money for the elites is over. Kevin Walsh is president Trump's new pick for the Fed share. But this is about much more than interest rates. It's the beginning of what president Trump is calling a Republican new deal. Speaker 1: Their proposal was to raise taxes very substantially. And our proposal, which is in the great, big, beautiful new deal. It's a new deal in its own way. It's a republican version of the new deal. Right behind you is a nice picture of FDR. This is a much better deal than the FDR deal. Speaker 0: Now Kevin Worsch didn't just accept the nomination. He declared war on the globalist economic model. He explicitly said that the Fed must abandon the dogma that paying workers causes inflation. He's calling out the real culprit, money printing and Wall Street bailouts. But this follows Ambassador Jamieson Greer's shockwave speech in Davos last week, where he dusted off Alexander Hamilton to tell the elites, your system is over. I'm Susan Kokinda. And since the mid 1970s, I've tracked the war between the American system and the British empire. So if you want to understand why the globalists are terrified of a Republican new deal, you're in the right place. So please hit those like, share, and subscribe buttons, help us reach more people, and stay in touch. So this is what we're gonna look at today. Why the Kevin Walsh nomination demonstrates President Trump's commitment to the American people and not Wall Street? How Ambassador Greer's Hamilton speech is an even bigger threat to the elites? And what is the real content of president Trump's Republican new deal? Now if you look at much of the mainstream media's coverage of Warsh, you get a kind of whistling past the graveyard feeling. Many of the headlines uncharacteristically reported the fact of his appointment with no screaming adjectives, not exactly typical of the New York Times or national public radio. But scratch a little deeper and the fear starts seeping in. The Atlantic Council, which is the voice of NATO and the Anglo American elites, worried that Worsch and treasury secretary Besant are in sync in their attacks on how the Fed has saved Wall Street at the expense of Main Street. Here's what the Atlantic Council's lead international economist said. Walsh believes the Fed has distorted the healthy functioning of The US economy through its injections of money into the market, helped assets on Wall Street at the expense of Main Street, and taken on the role of implementing fiscal policy. Guess who else thinks exactly the same thing? Treasury secretary Scott Besson. But it gets even better. The Atlantic Council author spelled out the consequences of this. What does this mean for the global economy? If you're a country looking to the Fed to jump into the fray during an economic crisis, you may be in for a rude awakening. This is not going to be the committee to save the world, Fed, of Ben Bernanke, Janet Yellen, and Jay Powell. Or CNBC, which ran the headline, Kevin Walsh touts regime change at the Fed. They really did use the word regime change, and so did Kevin Walsh. Now you're gonna get a counter narrative from some establishment mouthpieces who are either whistling past the graveyard or hoping to control Walsh, like the council on foreign relations, which consoles itself with this analysis. Kevin Warsh won't revolutionize the Fed. Or the central banker's central banker, Mark Carney, who's gonna try and play nice by praising Warsh. But anyone who looks at the Warsh nomination in isolation of everything else this administration is saying or doing is not looking at the bigger picture. Look at the second part of that CNBC headline, the part about partnership with the treasury. Here's what they said. Both Besson and Worsch have historically made clear that the Fed has gotten outside of its lane and that the treasury needs to play more of its historical role. And here's what Worsch himself said in 2010. The Fed's financial stability responsibilities should not give license to central bankers to be emergency capital providers. Capital allocation should reside if anywhere with the fiscal authority and its fiscal agent, the Department of Treasury. Now that gets us to the battle that's been going on for over two hundred years, the battle between the American system of Alexander Hamilton and the British imperial system. But before we go deeper, if you're starting to see that this fight is about something much bigger than interest rates and monetary policy and that this is at the heart of the fight to make America great again, then go to Promethean Action and subscribe to our free newsletter and keep yourself in the loop. Because this isn't just about interest rates. It's about a return to the economic model that built this country. And to understand the stakes, you need to understand what happened to those champions of the American system throughout our history. Now the American system was openly put on the table of, at all places, Davos. Everyone saw the fireworks at Davos. They saw president Trump and commerce secretary Lutnick telling the assembled so called elites that globalism had failed and their very reason for being was over. You saw Scott Besson's multiple and masterful takedowns of Gavin Neepads Newsom. But the real killer shot was delivered by special trade ambassador Jameson Greer in his speech entitled, the Hamiltonian economic system that too many have forgotten. Here's how he began. Speaker 2: On 12/05/1791, America's first treasury secretary, Alexander Hamilton, delivered something called the report on manufacturers to Congress. In that report, Hamilton articulated a plan for The United States to shake off its economic dependency on the British Empire. In that report, Hamilton argued for a strong economic policy that would allow America to become an industrial power. He called for a combination of tariffs and subsidies to incentivize industrialization. Hamilton believed that such measures were necessary to promote the development of industries, like textiles at the time, that needed protection from dominant foreign producers to develop the scale that would allow them to supply US needs and also be globally competitive. This vision, as I will discuss, laid the foundation for American and even global prosperity in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Speaker 0: Now look at that title again. The Hamiltonian economic system that too many have forgotten. Well, it wasn't just forgotten. Here's what they don't tell you in the history books. Every American leader who seriously pursued Hamiltonian economics got assassinated, starting with Alexander Hamilton, who was shot in eighteen o four by Aaron Burr. Hamilton's genius had made us economically sovereign with a national bank that ensured our independence from the Bank of England and his system of tariffs that protected our manufacturing and our workers. Abraham Lincoln, well, he was shot in 1865. Why? For pursuing the same policies of national banking, tariffs, and internal improvements. And then William McKinley in nineteen o one. Now McKinley has become more in the public eye recently because president Trump is constantly pointing out that McKinley's tariffs made us wealthy and industrially strong, and he was assassinated too. If you wanna know more of the history of how it is that it's the British who assassinate our presidents, check out our ebook on our website. The link is in the description. Now what happened twelve years after McKinley was assassinated? The United States fell to the British run central banking system with the establishment of the Federal Reserve. Now think again about the appointment of Kevin Borsch and his alignment with Scott Bessent on tilting the balance away from the Fed to the treasury for the benefit of Main Street. So when the Democrats or even some of the lumpheaded Republicans try and turn the Walsh nomination into an academic debate of interest rates, remember that history and realize that something very, very big is happening. So what does very big actually look like? Now you're not gonna hear about it in the political chatter or in market commentary. You'll see it on the ground in factories and in paychecks. Let me show you. President Trump emphasized the same point that Warsh made about the Fed throttling growth in Thursday's cabinet meeting when he said this. Speaker 1: Go back twenty years, twenty five years. I'm old enough to remember. When we had good news, when you announced good news, the stock market went up. You announce anything good, the stock market went up. You announce bad, the stock market went and that's way it should be. But now it's over the last fifteen or so years, if you announce good news, that means they're gonna raise interest rates because they wanna kill it. So you can never really be that successful because you announce all record numbers. Great. Great. Great. Because they're afraid of inflation. But growth doesn't have to have any impact on inflation. It can make inflation go down in many cases. Speaker 0: And that is how it works. The Fed has been deliberately strangling American growth to protect Wall Street and their international brethren in London and elsewhere. This is the British model of economics. Sacrifice everything, industrial growth, wages, productivity to feed a financial cancer. What is past for economic discussion has always been about money or financial flows. But Trump's cabinet meeting wasn't about that. It was about workers. It was about production and Main Street. Trump did call it a Republican version of the New Deal. But here's what that actually looks like on the ground, not in financial markets, but in factories and in the lives of working families. They talked about the $18,000,000,000,000 being invested right now with thousands of businesses, plants, and equipment all over the country springing up. And to the applause of the entire cabinet, treasury secretary Besson announced that for the first time in twenty six years, The United States produced more steel than Japan. And he said to the president, that is entirely driven by your tariffs. They also reported that John Deere announced two new massive plants being built in Indiana and North Carolina. The North Carolina plant will build excavating equipment. There hasn't been an excavator built in this country in fifty years, and this plant is relocating from Japan back to The United States because of president Trump's tariffs. Now here's a map which shows just a few of the other factory restarts where we are gearing up a productive capacity here at home that we haven't had in decades, like a graphite processing plant in New York, the first one in The US in seventy years. Commerce secretary Howard Lutnick told the president, you've changed America and created the golden age. It is a golden age out of a dark age of economic destruction. But if you are listening to the mainstream press or if you're caught up in today's mega world social media storm, whatever it is, you're gonna miss this. And small business administrator head Kelly Loeffler said just that. Speaker 3: The most important and underreported war that this president ended was Joe Biden and the Democrats' war on Main Street and hardworking families. We've seen it as I've gone across the country this month, 10 different states, and we saw it when we were together in Iowa. Hardworking families, farmers, small businesses expressing gratitude lined up to thank you. I was out with our great vice president last week in Toledo, Ohio. They are thanking this administration for getting Main Street back. The Trump tax cuts, the tariffs, deregulation, it's all rocket fuel for hardworking families in Main Streets. Speaker 0: This is what the empire hates, a nation with economic sovereignty, a robust middle and working class with rising wages and hope for the future. And that's what Donald Trump is delivering, and he isn't asking the city of London or the Federal Reserve permission any longer. His 20,000,000,000,000 in foreign investments is channeling money directly into the economy outside of the Fed. So manufacturing is back. Small businesses are reviving. Wages are rising. Energy is flowing. And now he's put his man in at the Fed so the Fed can't get in the way. That's the Republican new deal. Not bailouts for banks, but production for workers. The American system is coming back. So to wrap it up, Kevin Walsh isn't just a Fed nominee. He's a declaration of war on the Wall Street bailout machine and a direct challenge to decades of British style central banking independence. Jameson Greer's Hamilton speech at Davos is the resurrection of the American system. And Donald Trump's Republican new deal isn't a slogan. It's here. But like SBA administrator Loffler said, you're not hearing this. And if you're not hearing it, you can't organize with it, which is why you need to join us at Promethean Action. We don't just analyze. We give you what you need to organize the forces in this country that will ensure that president Trump succeeds. And paying members and contributors will help us do that. So please join and get active in this fight. The modern British empire is panicking because the fight is out in the open. Commerce secretary Lutnick said it at Davos. Globalization is over. Fed nominee Warsh said it. Main Street, not Wall Street. And the cabinet meeting celebrated it. The enemy knows that if Trump succeeds and the American system comes back to life, their century of control is over just in time for our 200 birthday. This has been your Saturday Brief. Thanks for watching. Please take a moment and subscribe to our free newsletter at prometheanaction.com.
Saved - January 3, 2026 at 8:07 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

The Trump warning from months ago - it was obvious all along why he was installed a second time. https://t.co/VeApmcEpdd

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 describes a scenario in which troops are on the streets in Los Angeles and Washington DC, with Trump saying he will deploy troops in other cities and aiming to unseat Maduro in Venezuela due to oil, while disregarding stated justifications. He notes these developments as examples of what he has warned about, arguing that in the United States these moves come from a leader who claims to oppose them. He contends that Alex Jones is promoting the same policies that he says Trump is introducing, including a plan to use troops to intervene in Venezuela and to deploy troops into Mexico against the Mexican government, citing drug cartels as a pretext. Speaker 1 then connects these events to a broader historical pattern, tracing them to technocracy and the concept of a technate—an intended global government run by appointed technocrats and bureaucrats rather than elected politicians. He asserts that Elon Musk’s grandfather, Holderman, supported technocracy in the United States and that the technate movement in the 1930s aligned with Adolf Hitler. He references maps from the 1930s showing a technate extending from Venezuela through Central America, Mexico, the United States, and Canada, ending in Greenland. He claims this vision of technate relates to efforts to position Greenland as an American territory and to the idea of reshaping North American governance into a non-elective, globally coordinated structure under a world government. Speaker 1 asserts that moves to intervene in Venezuela, deploy troops into Mexico, and the push for Greenland as a territory fit into the unfolding technate plan. He emphasizes that, from his perspective after decades of analysis, these elements “fit together,” and that even people who oppose some aspects may still be supporting components of the same global dystopia conspiracy. He notes that his synthesis has become clearer over time, contrasting it with how the same ideas seemed bewildering in earlier years. Speaker 0 briefly shifts to directing readers to the video description for further reading and to obtain his latest book, which is positioned as streamlining these interconnections. He mentions his new book as designed to demonstrate how the various elements align into a single conspiracy framework.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In February and March 2026, I'll be back on the road in Hull, Gateshead, Derby, and in Colchester. 2026 is when they want to cross the line as fast as they can into an AI controlled humanity. We stand up now or we regret it forever. That's four dates, and you can get the tickets in the link below. Speaker 1: So now we have troops on the streets in Los Angeles. We have troops on the streets in Washington DC. We have the dictator Trump saying he's gonna introduce troops on the streets in other cities. He wants to unseat Maduro in Venezuela because of all the oil they have. Never mind the excuses he gives. They always do that. It's because of the all all the oil there. And we're seeing, ironically, everything that I've been warning about coming to fruition in The United States, everywhere else too, but in The United States, via a man who claims to oppose what he's introducing. There's there's no better example of someone who has sold out to a colossal extent, in indeed, totally, than Alex Jones. I was pointing this stuff out a long time ago, and then along came Alex Jones later, but still a long time ago. And he was talking about all these things that Trump is introducing, and he was opposing them. He was warning about them. And now, day after day, he's promoting them. The latest one, which I found absolutely staggering last night, is that he's supporting Trump's desire to use troops to unseat Maduro in Venezuela and to put troops into Mexico against the will of the Mexican government using the excuse of drug cartels or whatever. But if you put this thing together in a much more expanded way, you can go back to Elon Musk's grandfather, a guy called Holderman, who was operating in Canada, and he was pushing something called technocracy. The Technate, they called it. The technate technocracy is a form of government, which they want global, globally, in which no longer do you have elected politicians. That's why they're putting so many moronic politicians into power because they're trying to undermine public support for elected politicians. You look at the UK cabinet, there's not a brain cell to rub together. Not two brain cells to rub together there in the cabinet of the UK, including the prime minister, Starman. You look at the cabinet and the government of Trump in The United States, same. I'm sure you'll find you look out all over Europe, you'll find the same too. So the idea is that you have a government of appointees, of technocrats, of bureaucrats, of people running health systems, etcetera, etcetera, appointed people. And the tech nate that Elon Musk's grandfather wanted and was supported by people in The United States, and the technocracy movement in the nineteen thirties supported Adolf Hitler, by the way, they were planning a technate area that went from where? You can see the maps, the old maps from the nineteen thirties that goes from Venezuela in South America all the way through Central America, including Panama and Mexico, up through The United States, up through Canada, and guess where it ends in the North? Greenland. And when you look at targeting Venezuela, moving troops into Mexico, saying we want Canada to be the fifty first state, which he never mentioned in the election campaign, and suddenly he comes to office and he's all over it, And why they want to include Greenland as an American territory is it's the tech nate unfolding, and these tech nates, are designed to have their like all over the world under a world government, which again would be appointed not elected. So when you've been doing it as long as I have, thirty six years now, these things all fit. But if you're new to it, it's bewildering, and I understand why. It was bewildering to me in 1990. You don't see how the things fit, and therefore, I've just finished a new book which is designed specifically to put these elements together and show how it all fits together because I see people, genuine people, who are opposing this but supporting that when that and this are both part of the same conspiracy for global dystopia. If you Speaker 0: want to read more and watch more of my content, then go to the description under the video where you can buy my books. The latest one is the road map, where you can get tickets for public events, and how you can subscribe to a fantastic video channel called iconiciconic.com.
Saved - December 22, 2025 at 11:36 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

Why are the tiny British Isles so important to the Global Cult and human control? Watch Part 1 of this 2-part series for free at http://Ickonic.com. Albion - Heart of the World. Fantastic information. https://t.co/ojpF6Mg6M1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ley lines, meridian lines, or dragon lines—the lines of energetic force that interpenetrate and cross planet Earth. Albion, the heart of the world, is awash with them. The point on the global grid where they cross in greatest abundance forms the center of the pattern. They connect standing stone circles, standing stones, ancient earthworks, churches, sacred hills, all located at the power centers where the lines cross. The speaker asks why these islands spawned a global empire—the British Empire—on which it was said that the sun never set, so massive was its scale and breadth that it spanned every time zone where the sun shines. Over thousands of years, a global secret society network of deceit and manipulation—the “global cult”—has been associated with and located in England and the British Isles. This is described as the heart of the global energy pattern, the heart of the world. Control the heart center, and you control the world. The ancients knew about these power centers and their significance through the druids, the priestly class of the Celts, and secret societies like the Knights Templar, which pass on this knowledge through initiations while keeping it overwhelmingly from the general population. The speaker asks: what is it about stone and stones? Ley lines and vortices create a fourth dimensional phenomenon. Nonhuman gods manipulating human society are a fourth dimensional phenomenon. To influence the three-dimensional world from the fourth dimension, they need a dense slow vibration—dense matter—to anchor that fourth dimensional energy in three-dimensional reality. They use crystalline stones overwhelmingly, noting that crystals are used in communication technology. This means that energetically sensitive individuals can tune in through the crystal to information in the ley lines and access knowledge the ancients perceived as the crowned while sitting on an ancient stone in the coronation chair at Westminster Abbey. The reason for the relationship between stones and coronations is suggested to be that stone anchors fourth dimensional entities in three-dimensional reality, which become, in the unseen part of the coronation ritual, the possession by fourth dimensional reptilian gods, with the human level as a vehicle for possession. The world we think we see is different when we consider what we don’t see. Ley lines and power points are part of a vast electrical electromagnetic system. The whole universe is an electrical electromagnetic system. People attend circles like this and see stones, but if they could see beyond visible light into fourth dimensional reality, they would see lines of force and electromagnetic energy forming vortices where they meet. The ancients placed stone circles and standing stones on these points, and pyramids were placed where they are to tap into and harness this electrical system of energy, consciousness, and information. When lines cross and create a vortex, the difference between the third and fourth dimensions thins; the gods can sometimes manifest as astral interferences. Albion’s central importance lies in the nature of the energy passing through the grid, crucial to everyday life. The grid is a fourth dimensional field we can’t see but can feel. London has long attracted secret groups—Knights Templar, the inner core of the Freemasons, Druids—who have known how to tap and harness that power to influence human consciousness, contributing to an empire built from a center in London during which the sun never set. If the strands are pulled together, a stream of ancient knowledge from Babylon through Rome and into the British Isles emerges, known by this secret network. What’s happening now is that the general population is beginning to uncover what they have known all along, and when the population knows, the game changes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ley lines, meridian lines, or dragon lines, the lines of energetic force which interpenetrate and cross planet Earth. Albion, the heart of the world, is awash with them. The point on the global grid of force lines, energy lines, ley lines, meridian lines, dragon lines, where they cross in greatest abundance to form the center of the pattern. They connect standing stone circles, standing stones, ancient earthworks, churches, sacred hills, all located at the power centers where the lines cross. Why did these islands spawn a global empire, the British Empire, on which it was said that the sun never set so massive was its scale and breadth that it spanned every time zone on which the sun shines. Why through thousands of years of history has the global secret society network of deceit and manipulation that I call the global cult been associated with and located in England and the British Isles. This is the center, the heart of the global energy pattern. This is the heart of the world. Control the heart center, and you control the world. The ancients knew about these power centers and their significance in the form of people like the druids, the priestly class of the Celts, and secret societies like the Knights Templar that pass on this knowledge through initiations, through the generations, while keeping it overwhelmingly from the general population. What is it about stone and stones? These ley lines and vortices which the ley lines crossing create, are a fourth dimensional phenomena. And the nonhuman gods manipulating human society are a fourth dimensional phenomena. And to influence the three d world from the four d world, they need a dense slow vibration, what we call matter, dense matter, in this case, to anchor that fourth dimensional energy in three d reality. And they use crystalline stones overwhelmingly, and note that crystals are used in communication technology. And it means that this energetically sensitive can tune in through the crystal to this information in the ley lines and communicate and access information from what the ancients perceived as the crowned while sitting on an ancient stone in the coronation chair at Westminster Abbey? What on earth could be the reason for that? The relationship with stones and coronations, I suggest, is that stone anchors fourth dimensional entities in three d reality, which therefore become in the unseen part of the coronation ritual. Is the human queen or king being crowned as the monarch, or the ritual obsessed, title obsessed, fourth dimensional reptilian gods for which the human level is merely a vehicle for possession? Possession is another way that fourth dimensional entities can be anchored in three d reality via the body. The world we think we see is so different when you encompass what we don't see. We can see the real meaning of these ley lines and power points. They are part of a vast electrical electromagnetic system. The whole universe is a electrical electromagnetic system. People come to circles like this and they see stones. Okay? But if they could see beyond visible light and into fourth dimensional reality, they would see lines of force, electromagnetic, electrical lines of force coming into these places and creating a vortex as they meet. So this is why the ancients put their stone circles and standing stones upon these points, why the pyramids were placed where they are. It was to tap into and harness this electrical system of electromagnetic energy consciousness information. When these lines cross and create this vortex, the vortex thins out the difference between the third dimension and the fourth dimension. So at these places, it's very much thinner and the gods can not communicate, but often they can manifest because they're much closer to this reality when the vortexes are thrown up. The astral realm is interfering, interacting with this world. We're now closing in on why Albion, heart of the world, is so important and why the nature of the energy passing through the grid is crucial to what happens here in what we call everyday life. The grid is a fourth dimensional field which we can't see, but we can feel. London has a long and extraordinary history and has attracted secret groups and societies for thousands of years to its energy grid in the heart of the world, including the Knights Templar, the inner core of the Freemasons, and the Druids, the priestly class of the Celts, who have all known how to tap and harness that power for their own ends. As London developed, they placed their major religious government and royal buildings and palaces on power points within the grid, and used that power to sow impact on human consciousness via the field that an empire was built from here on which that sun never set. And if you pull all the strands together, what you've got is a stream of knowledge coming ancient world, out of Babylon, and going through Rome and the Roman Empire, coming to settle to a such a large extent in the British Isles. This secret network has known about this knowledge all along. It's known the nature of reality and how we interact with it. It's known the true nature of the British Isles and why they are so important. But what's happening now is we are uncovering for the general population what they've known all along. And when the population know what they know, the game changes.
Saved - December 17, 2025 at 7:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see Musk as not a freedom fighter, but enabled by a Deep State to seize Twitter with cult money, turning X into a propaganda vehicle for AI control. He talks of free speech while quietly bowing to authorities—Brazil, Australia, the EU—and increasing censorship beyond pre-Musk levels. To me, X is a lasso to marginalize real pushbackers, not a true free-speech platform.

@davidicke - David Icke

Some background. Musk was never a friend of freedom - he just wanted you to believe that. He was ALLOWED by the 'Deep State' to this end to acquire Twitter not least with Cult billionaire money including the free speech absolutists of Saudi Arabia. The idea was to make you think he is 'one of us' when it was all a scam get you onside and turn 'X' into a propaganda vehicle for the AI control agenda (which he has). Part of this strategy was to make lots of noise about refusing censorship in Brazil, Australia, the EU, etc., but then quietly bowing to all of them and INCREASING the censorship on the say-so of authority even beyond what Twitter was doing pre-Musk. This latest cave is therefore painfully predictable, and people need to realise that Musk's X is not an ongoing free speech platform - it is a lasso to target, marginalise and ultimately exclude the real pushbackers the Cult wants to silence. This move is only the latest - NOT the last. ‘Freedom of speech not freedom of reach’ and making posts that are ‘lawful but awful’ almost impossible to find is just another form of censorship - as Musk knew all along.

@FinanceLancelot - Financelot

BREAKING: X just updated its privacy policy stating it will adhere to EU & UK demands to remove content. It also warns users, "You are responsible for the content you post or create". https://t.co/weLGy2ik4d

@FinanceLancelot - Financelot

Twitter X new "trust & safety" officers (Zach Schapira & Michal Totchani) are former Israeli intelligence agents X's biometric data is shared with AU10TIX, a Israel intelligence firm X's current CEO Linda Yaccarino was a chairperson at the WEF What's really going on here Elon? https://t.co/nb4TygIMgz

Saved - December 16, 2025 at 12:36 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

Unleashing on Digital ID and the AI control system. https://t.co/nwsycAxfdq

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker describes an unusually heavy police presence at a protest surrounding the idea of “putting the Christ back into Christmas,” noting this contrasts with the counter-protest on the opposite side and framing it as part of a larger pattern of divide and rule. The core argument is that the few have historically controlled the many by enforcing rigid, unquestioning beliefs and pitting belief systems against one another, thereby suppressing exploration and research beyond those beliefs. The speaker urges putting down fault lines of division and argues that if people would sit down and talk, the fault lines would appear overwhelmingly irrelevant. The focus should be on threats to basic freedoms, especially those of children and grandchildren, which are being “deleted” in the process. The claim is that the basic freedoms of individuals are being eroded by a digital AI human fusion control system the speaker has warned about for decades, tempered by increasing concern as fewer laugh and more people worry about it. A central warning is that those seeking control would create a dystopia by infiltrating the human mind with artificial intelligence, leveraging a digital network of total human control. The speaker asserts this is already happening to the point that people no longer think their own thoughts or have their own emotional responses; “we have theirs via AI.” The speaker targets public figures and tech figures, asserting that Elon Musk is promoting an AI dystopia, and naming Starmer as aligned with Tony Blair, who is allegedly connected to Larry Ellison and other media and AI interests. The claim is that these figures supposedly “have your best interests at heart,” in the speaker’s view a misleading portrayal. There is a warning about a future in which digital IDs and digital currencies dictate daily life, with AI-driven fusion reducing human thinking to negligible levels. Ray Kurzweil is cited as predicting that by 2030 humanity will be fused with AI, with AI taking over more human thinking. The speaker emphasizes that 8,000,000,000 people cannot be controlled by a few unless the many acquiesce, and calls for unity to resist this trajectory. The rallying message is a call to unite, to reject divisions, and to act collectively to stop being controlled by a few. The speaker uses the metaphor that united, we are lions; divided, we are sheep, and urges the lion to roar. The conclusion is a global appeal for the lion to awaken and roar, signaling readiness to resist the imagined dystopia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a strange thing for the the Mets to have to fill this whole area with more police and police vans that I've ever seen at any protest because they've allowed three in the same place. But it's also very symbolic because you've got the the protest down there or or what's claimed to be put the Christ back into Christmas. And then you've got the counter protest on the other side. And that is the essential ingredient throughout human history of the few controlling the many. Divide and rule. Get people to have rigid, unquestioning beliefs, which shuts off their ability, desire to look and research and explore beyond the limits of the belief system, and then you play the belief systems off against each other to divide and rule. And what we're saying here is you can argue about religion. You can argue about politics. But while you're doing that, the basic human freedoms of ourselves, yes, but more than anything, our children and grandchildren are in the process of being deleted. And what we're saying is, or what I'm saying is, look, put down the fault lines of division. And if you just sat down and talked to each other, you'd see that they were overwhelmingly irrelevant fault lines. And then you might be able to focus your attention on that which threatens the freedom of all of us. I don't care if you're a Christian or Muslim or Hindu or Buddhist or atheist, whatever you are, your freedom and your children's freedom is being deleted by the hour through a digital AI human fusion control system that I have been warning about decade after decade to immense laughter, but a lot less these days. But still, the divide and rule goes on. And if you were trying to impose a control system, the like of which humanity has never seen in known human history, a control system based on AI fusion with humans to take over the human mind that involves a digital, network of total human control. If you were doing that and you had the next few years as your target to do it, and you were a few, what would you need to do? What would you want to happen? You would want your target population to be at war with itself over irrelevant freaking belief systems, and that's what we're here to argue against. If enough people say we're not doing it, aren't yours. We're not having it. When when enough people say that, when enough people do that, we'll see where the power has been all along. Ironically, it's never been with the few. It's always been with the many. But for reasons I've discussed and talked about here, the many have been manipulated into forgetting that basic fact. So here we are because of that. We are staring in the eyes of the dragon to see a digital AI human fusion dystopia, the like of which this world has never seen in known human history. And what is that dystopia? It is to infiltrate the human mind with artificial intelligence. It's already happening to the point where we no longer think our thoughts anymore. We no longer have our emotional responses anymore. We have theirs via AI. And anyone who thinks, and unfortunately, some still do, that Elon Musk is your friend, he is pushing and pushing and pushing while telling you here what you wanna hear. He's pushing this AI dystopia with all his mates, and you only have to go to Starmer down the road. Who is Starmer's handler? Tony Blair. Who is Tony Blair's handler? Larry Ellison, the media and AI billionaire. Supposedly, Musk supposedly, Musk is the richest man in the world. Supposedly, Ellison is the second richest. And they have your best interests at heart. We are looking we are looking now in a few years if we don't unite and don't put down these fault lines of division at a level of control that beggars belief and imagination. Where as Ray Kurzweil, the Google futurist kind of executive who is as articulating this, oh, it will be great to be fused with AI. What has he said a few years ago? He said that by 2030, we are coming into 2026. By 2030, humanity will be attached to artificial intelligence or it would have started, already has. And from then on, he said his words, not mine. Humanity or AI will do more and more of human thinking until human thinking is negligible. That's what we are staring in the face. And this digital ID with a digital currency dictating everything in our lives, what we can do and what we can't do, along with the AI human fusion, is a level of dystopia that is beyond the imagination. We still have the chance because 8,000,000,000 cannot be controlled by a few unless the few acquiesce or the many acquiesce to the few. It's not possible. So we can bring this down essentially overnight if enough people say we are not doing what you demand. And it's the division that stops that happening. So people want solutions. People want to remove the cause of the problem. Then it's in our hands to do so. And that means human race for the first time in known human history. Get off your freaking knees. No more. United. United, we are a lion. Divided, we are sheep. We have the answer. But are we going to take it? That's the question. Because united, we are the lions, and it's time that the lion that has been there sleeping throughout human history, that the lion sleeps no more. It's time long past the time, and I say to anyone across the world who sees this, it's time for the lion to roar. Thank you.
Saved - December 16, 2025 at 12:32 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

What REALLY Happened At Bondi Beach - And Why? https://t.co/5DM4HUmOyA

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: In February and March 2026, I'll be back on the road in Hull, Gateshead, Derby, and Colchester. 2026 is when they want to cross the line as fast as they can into an AI controlled humanity. We stand up now or we regret it forever. That's four dates. Speaker 0: I recorded an edition of a show for iconic.com called Legacy, relating the content of my books to today. A central concept is what I labeled in the 1990s as problem reaction solution, also known as a false flag. The idea is to create a situation—war, terrorist attack, banking collapse, or something similar—then present the version of the problem you want the public to believe to provoke outrage and urgency. Then you covertly create the problem, evoke a public reaction, and openly offer the solutions you’ve already prepared. Speaker 0: Nine-Eleven is given as a classic example: attack on New York and Washington, blame Arab terrorists, claim Osama bin Laden and the Taliban orchestrated it. The reaction is “do something,” followed by the invasions of Afghanistan and other Middle Eastern countries. In response to Bondi Beach, the point is made that representatives may not truly represent the people, and a global network I call the global cult drives dystopia through digital AI means, operating through governments, intelligence agencies, and militaries worldwide. Even leaders such as presidents or prime ministers may not serve their nations’ people but the global cult’s interests. Speaker 0: One center of this global cult’s operations is Israel, established in 1948 for that purpose. The claim is that leadership claiming to represent Jewish people operates for the global cult rather than Jewish communities, and may even sacrifice Jewish lives to advance its aims through problem reaction solution. The Gaza crisis since October 7 is described as the world’s large-scale trauma, with statements about the Israeli government’s psychopathy and a super psychopathology characterized by a complete lack of empathy and deletion of compassion. The question is whether such leaders can truly have compassion for fellow Jews if they are driven by a broader agenda. Speaker 0: Regarding October 7, the Gaza border fence is described as the world’s most defended border, with sensors so sensitive that even a small animal would be detected. Yet Hamas breached the fence in multiple places, and there were reports of a stand-down by the Israeli defense forces, allowing the cross-border assault and hostage-taking. The outcome, it’s claimed, was used by Netanyahu to justify mass slaughter and destruction in Gaza, with talk of plans to take over land and expel Palestinians. The narrative then shifts to global perception, with some Christian Zionists wavering in support due to Gaza atrocities, and Israel allegedly funding influence campaigns to restore its global image, including money to American politicians and media interests. Speaker 0: When a new attack—Bondi Beach in Australia—occurs, Netanyahu publicly notes a Jewish man disarmed one of the attackers (though a Muslim did so), before retracting. This is presented as part of a pattern: calls to crack down on anti-Semitism, equating anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel and Zionism. The claim is that the only beneficiary is those who use such events to justify censorship and control of information, while the victims, including Jewish people who died or were injured, gain nothing. Speaker 0: The discussion reiterates that mind-control techniques exist and could drive individuals to commit mass violence without full awareness, referencing mind-control concepts like Manchurian candidates. The speaker urges asking “who benefits?” and considering elements of problem reaction solution and false flags in analyzing events, recognizing that appearances of representation do not guarantee genuine representation. For readers interested in more, the speaker directs to their books and content.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In February and March 2026, I'll be back on the road in Hull, Gateshead, Derby, and in Colchester. 2026 is when they want to cross the line as fast as they can into an AI controlled humanity. We stand up now or we regret it forever. That's four dates, and you can get the tickets in the link below. Hello. I've, I've just recorded an edition of a show I do for iconic.com called Legacy, in which I look at the content of my books over what is now coming into my thirty sixth year of researching this and relate what I've said over the years to what is happening today. And that's appropriate because in these books and many others that I've written is the concept of what I dubbed in the 1990s problem reaction solution. And it's also become known as a false flag. This is when you create a situation in which it could be a war, it could be a terrorist attack, could be a banking collapse, could be anything, but you create a problem and you then tell the public the version of that problem that you want them to believe because you want that reaction from the public of outrage, of fear, of something must be done. This can't go on. What are they gonna do about it? And then you who have covertly created the problem, got that reaction, do something, you then openly offer the solutions to the problems you have covertly created. Now, the events, the horrific events of nine eleven are a wonderful example of problem reaction solution at work where you have a attack on New York and Washington and you blame Arab terrorists for it, and you say that it was orchestrated by Osama bin Laden who is being protected by the Taliban in Afghanistan. And so you say, well, that's the problem. The reaction, understandable reaction, nine eleven, do something. You then offer the solution, which was the invasion of Afghanistan followed by the invasions of other Middle Eastern countries. And I say this now in response to what has happened in Bondi Beach. You know, one of the hardest things to get across to people over the years has been that just because people claim to be representatives of a certain group of people, it doesn't mean they are. I've exposed and exposed and exposed a global network I call the global cult, which is driving the world to ever greater dystopia, not least through digital AI means currently. And this global cult operates through governments right across the world. It operates through intelligence agencies. It operates through military. And just because someone may be a prime minister or a president of this country or that country does not mean that they are representing the people of that country or have their best interests at heart. You've only got to look through what we call history to see the actions of governments, prime ministers, presidents, and so on. And how they have used their own populations, they have killed and maimed and made their own populations suffer while claiming to represent them. Because they don't represent those people, they represent this global cult and its interests. And one of the centers of this global cult's operations, along with, yes, of course, The United States and and and Europe and Britain and other countries around the world, but one of the major centers is Israel. It was created in 1948 for that specific reason. And to understand the way those that claim to be representing Jewish people operate is to understand that this leadership, this network is representing not Jewish people, it's representing this global cult. And thus, it is quite happy to see Jewish people suffer and die for reasons of ensuring, not least through problem reaction solution, that its demands on how society must change are invoked and imposed. Now we have seen from the way the Israeli government has has perpetrated the mass unspeakable, unimaginable trauma of slaughter, death and destruction in Gaza since October 7. Many times before that, but let's pick it up on October 7. We've seen that the leadership in Israel has no problem in its psychopathy and its evil to impose that unimaginable death, destruction, slaughter on men, women, and so many children in Gaza. So to do that, you need to be not just a psychopath, you need to be a super psychopath. And the top two traits of psychopaths, never mind super ones, is a complete lack and deletion of empathy, which I describe as the fail safe mechanism of human behavior because if you have empathy, if you can put yourself in the feelings of those you're affecting, it impacts upon what you will do to them. If you have no empathy, then it doesn't matter what you do to them because you will have no emotional consequence. And the other major trait of a psychopath, there are many, is you have a deletion of compassion, which kind of relates to the same thing. Now, we have game set and match, the evidence that those that control Israel have a super psychopathic nature and a complete deletion of empathy and compassion, otherwise they would not do what they have done in Gaza. So the next question must be, ah, but they obviously have compassion and empathy for their fellow Jewish people because they represent them. Oh, really? Do they really? Does someone, of that level of psychopathy have the ability to turn it on and off, or does it see all of humanity no matter what its background, religious, political, or cultural belief, does it see them all as mere fodder to be used and abused at will to ensure that their goals are played out? Well, let's ask that question about October 7. We have the Gaza border fence as the most defended border fence in in the world, on planet Earth. Talk to former members of the Israeli Defense Forces, and they will tell you that you have sensors on those fences so sensitive that if a cockroach or a bird comes close, they will know about it. Okay. There's supposed to be troops all around, constantly guarding any possible breach. And yet, on October 7, Hamas, and there's a lot to know about that organization and how it was funded into existence by the Israeli government, Hamas operatives breached that fence in multiple places and along with the so called friendly fire of the Israeli defense forces, eventually, all those Jewish people were were killed and injured. I remember watching a video by Charlie Kirk in which even he, a big supporter of Israel over the years, asked the question, how come Hamas were allowed to breach the border fence? As he put it, he'd flown in a helicopter from Jerusalem to the Gaza border in forty five minutes, And yet, after Hamas breached the border fence, there is this long, long, long period of no response from Israeli troops, the Israeli army. Why? Question Kirk asked. Was it? Was there a stand down? I remember him asking. Well, members of the Israeli defense forces have had the guts to come out since and say, yes, there was a stand down that allowed her mass to breach the fence and do what it did and take the hostages. Why would anyone do that? Why would you allow a, quote, terrorist organization to breach the border fence and do that to Jewish people within the land we call Israel or calls itself Israel anyway? Why? Why would you do that? Ah, but wait. As I've said so many times over the years, don't listen to the words. Look at the outcome. So what was the outcome of what happened that day? It was used, problem, reaction, solution. It was used as the excuse by Netanyahu, a cult operative to his fingertips, to justify the said mass slaughter and destruction of Gaza. To the point where they are now talking about what the plan was all along to completely take over that land and to eventually expel the Palestinians to other lands. Oh, it's, it's just a war zone. It's it's just rubble now, says Israel owned Donald Trump of Gaza. They can't possibly live there with all this has gotta happen. We've gotta rebuild it and all that stuff. Yeah. Exactly as planned. And so from this perspective, you look at what happened on October 7 from a completely different standpoint. A different perception of why it was allowed and it was absolutely allowed to happen. But in the doing it, in terms of what followed, Israel's global image went through near destruction. You had the Christian Zionists who believe the Old Testament about God saying Israel is the promised land and the Jewish people are the chosen people. But even a lot of them were starting to say in the face of the horrors, the daily horrors coming out of Gaza. No. No. Enough's enough. This can't be justified. And so Israel having done, and I'm talking about the Israeli government, having done what it wanted to do and believed it had to do, which is destroy Gaza, it had lost the global audience. Had to get it back. So in recent days and weeks, it's been revealed how the Israeli government and its Mossad military network has been putting together a vast sum of money to spend on influencing the global perception of Israel and restore support for its agenda, not least the money that goes to American politicians on a scale that, you know, beggars believe and goes to so called alternative influences. While people like Larry Ellison, so called second richest man in the world, the biggest private funder of the Israeli defense forces, has now bought CBS News, wants to buy CNN. All this is connected to controlling the narrative and selling Israel's image back to how it used to be. And then one shocking day, Muslims, two of them, start mass killing Jews on Bondi Beach in Australia. As a result of that, Netanyahu immediately hits the airwaves, he always does. He says, a Jewish man disarmed one of the Muslim gunmen, when actually it was a Muslim who disarmed him. But he says, no. It's a Jewish man, which he's had to retract. And so it begins As predictable as night following day, the calls for a crackdown on anti Semitism. Anti Semitism that is equated with criticizing Israel and Zionism. There is always the question, whenever these horrors happen, who benefits? Has the Muslim world benefited from what happened at Bondi Beach? No. Quite the opposite. Collectively, all fingers are pointing in their directions. Have Australians benefited? No. No. Of course not. Have the Jewish people who died and were injured benefited? Of course not. But if we go back to what I said earlier about psychopaths not caring less about their alleged own anymore than they care less about anyone else. They don't have to benefit because they don't matter to these people. One group of people alone have benefited from what happened at Bondi Beach. Anyone that wants to use that horror to justify global censorship of exposure and criticism of the Israeli government and its intelligence military networks. And we're seeing it. We were seeing it within hours. Condemnation by Netanyahu of those countries that recognize Palestine as a nation, as a state, castigating them for being responsible for this horror. Now as I speak, of course, there is a hell of a lot more research to do to get to the bottom of exactly what happened and how. But all the elements of what I've described in my books over the years as problem, reaction, solution are there to be seen. And I would add this too. From the mid nineteen nineties, right across the millennium and onwards, I made it my business to study mind control. And I'm not saying, oh, this is an explanation of what happened in Bondi Beach. I'm saying that whenever these events happen, we need to put that in the mix as a possibility, as a consideration, as part of the research. Because the techniques of mind control they have today could make anyone go crazy with a gun, kill grotesque numbers of people, and even have no idea that they were mind controlled to do it, even believing that they made the decisions to do it. Talk about Manchurian candidates. My goodness. Yes, Manchurian candidates exist, but today the techniques of mind control are vastly vastly superior to anything that went before. So I would say, before coming to conclusions about what happened, ask the question who benefits and consider how many elements of a classic problem reaction solution a false flag there are. And crucial to considering that and reaching the conclusions of what we believe happened is crucially to know that just because people appear to represent other groups of people as presidents, prime ministers, whatever, It does not mean that they do. If you want to read more and watch more of my content, then go to the description under the video where you can buy my books. The, latest one is the road map where you can get tickets for public events and how you can subscribe to a fantastic video channel, called iconiciconic.com.
Saved - October 30, 2025 at 11:17 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

The Moon is not what they tell you it is. https://t.co/dhDUipnvQu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The dialogue opens with a suggestion that a TV camera is bringing a fame-seeking personality into the spotlight, implying that the person revealing controversial material is not necessarily the best source and that the inquirer should instead direct questions to the administrator of NASA. The conversation then shifts to the subject of the Saturnian moon Mimas, widely nicknamed the “death star” for its appearance. The speaker characterizes this interpretation as ridiculous and cites a NASA scientist, Gordon McDonald, who reportedly said that the moon would seem to be hollow rather than a homogeneous sphere. This claim about the moon’s structure is presented as part of the larger discussion about anomalous lunar characteristics. The discussion continues with a reference to a seismic observation, noting that the Moon’s seismic record was described as “ringing like a bell.” In connection with these anomalies, the speaker mentions Carl Sagan’s alias in the text as “Carl Sager,” stating that Sagan argued that a natural satellite cannot be a hollow object. This thread of ideas is complemented by accounts attributed to Sergeant Carl Wolf, the National Press Club, and others, who are described as having experiences that NASA was airbrushing out certain elements before pictures were released to the public. Additionally, Harold Houray, noted as a Nobel Prize winner in chemistry, is described as being terribly puzzled by the rocks from the Moon, specifically failing to account for the levels of titanium observed in them. A central question is posed about the Moon—whether it is a planetoid that has been hollowed out or whether it is a total construct. The speakers acknowledge the uncertainty surrounding these possibilities, stating that they would not be dogmatic about one conclusion or another at this time. They emphasize the importance of keeping an open mind to the notion that events and discoveries may be occurring far beyond what people generally consider possible, and that the reality of these possibilities should be contemplated with openness rather than closed certainty.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And this makes you Filled up with a TV camera. Real famous person that has discovered this and reveals all this stuff to us. You're talking to the wrong guy. Why don't you talk to the administrator of NASA? Speaker 1: The death star moon. When you look at the Saturn moon Mimas, I mean, it's ridiculous. A NASA scientist Gordon McDonald said it would seem that the moon is more like a hollow than an homogeneous sphere. Speaker 0: On your seismic record, it was ringing like a bell. Speaker 1: Carl Sager said a natural satellite cannot be a hollow object. Sergeant Carl Wolf, the National Press Club, and others are telling of their experiences about how NASA was airbrushing out these things before pictures were released to the public. Harold Houray, a winner of the Nobel Prize for chemistry, said he was terribly puzzled by the rocks from the moon, and he could not account for the levels of titanium. Is it a planetoid, hollowed out? Is it a total construct? I wouldn't be dogmatic and say one or the other yet, but we have to open our minds to the fact that the things are going on around us that are far in advance of anything we think is possible.
Saved - October 12, 2025 at 1:12 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

They really DO live and they are controlling our world. 'Shapeshifting' is real and you can laugh all you like. It doesn't matter. It's still real. https://t.co/OzEQBW0IdD

Video Transcript AI Summary
By the year 2025, the entire planet will be under the protection and the dominion of this power alliance, the human power elite. The character uncovered that the world was controlled by entities hiding behind human form, produced by a guy called John Carpenter. They're holding this particular software, this reptilian force, this force, whatever you wanna call it. Because this software has no empathy, they can use them as a vehicle and simply direct their behavior and create the horrific things that happen in the world. When we talk about hybrid bloodlines, we're actually talking about hybrid energetic fields. It's because the possessing entities information field, it's impacting more and more on the field that the observer is decoding. The only place that shifting takes place physically is in the decoding systems of the brain. And so we're looking at these people, and they appear to be human, but they're very different.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By the year 2025, the entire planet will be under the protection and the dominion of this power alliance, the human power elite. The character uncovered that the world was controlled by entities hiding behind human form, produced by a guy called John Carpenter. They live as is in documentary about what's going on now. And it is. This is where the elite interbreeding with each other comes from. They're holding this particular software, this reptilian force, this force, whatever you wanna call it. Because this software has no empathy, they can use them as a vehicle and simply direct their behavior and create the horrific things that happen in the world. When we talk about hybrid bloodlines, we're actually talking about hybrid energetic fields. When there is a shift and the other field becomes the dominant one, anyone who is observing that shift sees it holographically. It's because the possessing entities information field, it's impacting more and more on the field that the observer is decoding. The only place that shifting takes place physically is in the decoding systems of the brain. And so we're looking at these people, and they appear to be human, but they're very different.
Saved - September 20, 2025 at 5:54 AM

@davidicke - David Icke

How about some research before jumping to convenient conclusions? Do we want the truth, or the 'truth' that suits the narrative? https://t.co/kzUZY2cSHn

Video Transcript AI Summary
They want us to believe that it was the left that was responsible: 'They want us to believe that it was the left that was responsible.' We're supposed to believe that 'this guy shot Kirk, then took the rifle apart, put it in the knapsack, jumped down, and hurry away.' We're told he hid it 'in a wood in a reassembled state' and then 'tells his his mate on a text where he's admitting everything in the official story.' And so what you need to do before you start jumping to conclusions, HFF. There may be elements in which that is the case, but 'who's orchestrating it?' Let's do some freaking research, and let's find out what really happened. People have killed him. They want civil war between left and right.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They want us to believe that it was the left that was responsible. And we're supposed to believe that this guy shot Kirk, then took the rifle apart, put it in the knapsack, jumped down, and hurry away. We're then told he hid it in a wood in a reassembled state and then tells his his mate on a text where he's admitting everything in the official story. And so what you need to do before you start jumping to conclusions, HFF. There may be elements in which that is the case, but who's orchestrating it? Let's do some freaking research, and let's find out what really happened. Instead of jumping to conclusions immediately People have killed him. Which are the conclusions they want us to have. Why? And we'll get into this now. They want civil war between left and right. But what you have to do is you have to go here, and you have to go to that level that is working through both left and right.
Saved - September 16, 2025 at 7:25 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

Far more people are now questioning the Israeli government and its influence in the United States, but it's been obvious all along. This is what I said about Trump's first term. https://t.co/VqOczkOsT8

Video Transcript AI Summary
The person nearest to Trump is his son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Netanyahu was sleeping in Kushner's bed in the family home. Netanyahu is very, very close friend of Kushner's father, Charles Kushner, a real estate mogul who was jailed for illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion, and witness tamper. Jared has funded illegal settlements in Israel. A funder of APAC, he's got big business connections to George Soros, Trump. From day one, he handed the American economy to Steven Mnuchin as his treasury secretary, also an ultra Zionist. He named his own lawyer, the extreme Zionist David Friedman. Jason Greenblatt, he became US special representative for international negotiations, which include negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. The Israeli regime is planning to push ahead because they own the president of The United States. This is the reality that we're facing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The person nearest to Trump is his son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Netanyahu was sleeping in Kushner's bed in the family home. Netanyahu is very, very close friend of Kushner's father, Charles Kushner, a real estate mogul who was jailed for illegal campaign contributions, tax evasion, and witness tamper. Jared has funded illegal settlements in Israel. A funder of APAC, he's got big business connections to George Soros, Trump. From day one, he handed the American economy to Steven Mnuchin as his treasury secretary, also an ultra Zionist. He named his own lawyer, the extreme Zionist David Friedman. Jason Greenblatt, he became US special representative for international negotiations, which include negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. The Israeli regime is planning to push ahead because they own the president of The United States. This is the reality that we're facing.
Saved - September 9, 2025 at 11:27 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

Be careful what you wish for. It may not be what you wish for. https://t.co/Fzx34otRg3

Video Transcript AI Summary
"True lockdown must begin, and it must begin now." "A lockdown together." "A lockdown united." "We must close our airports." "We must close all nonessential business." "We must cut all nonessential travel." "It is time for a full lockdown, and we are ready." "This is my proposal, and I pray that we can make this happen." "We have the advantage here in that we can see this coming." "Ireland, we have got this. Not only do we have the formula, we have it ahead of time." "Let's go Ireland. Let's go rest of the world." "Locked down united. Together we stand. God bless us all."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, everyone. Hello, Ireland. I would like to address my nation to the people of Ireland, to our president, Michael d Higgins, to vice admiral Mark Mellett, to Garda commissioner Drew Harris, chief medical officer, Tony Houlihan, Leo, the two Simons, Mehdi and Michal, I respect you all greatly, and I would like to put forth some of my thinking. I want to say that while are all currently debating a full lockdown, I feel that we must. Any time spent debating this is needless time from the clock. I know a good tough fight when I see one, and we have one on our hands now. I want to call upon my people, the great people of Ireland. This fight needs us all. We are all in the red corner together awaiting the bell. So let's gather together and ring the bell ourselves, including the people of the rest of the world. True lockdown must begin, and it must begin now. A lockdown together. A lockdown united. We must close our airports. We must close all nonessential business. We must cut all nonessential travel. Commissioner Harris and vice admiral Mellett, we must prepare and deploy our units to all and any known built up areas across our country now. President Higgins, you must give these great men and women the power to enforce this task if necessary. However, I know that when the true seriousness of this is understood as it is becoming now, our great nation will oblige and impeccably do so. It is time for a full lockdown, and we are ready. Powers that be, I am calling to you all. The fate of our great island depends on it. This is my proposal, and I pray that we can make this happen. We need to take the same measures of of some of the heavier affected countries, only we must do it in quicker time. We have the advantage here in that we can see this coming. We can see this coming, but if we if we do not act on our advantage, then we cannot expect different results. We are not adhering to social distancing, at least not to the extent required to halt exponential growth. A lockdown will facilitate this. It will reduce transmissions. It will take the pressure off of our frontline staff, it will allow us to identify all of our cases. These methods are stringent but necessary and have worked in China and Hong Kong. Ireland, we have got this. Not only do we have the formula, we have it ahead of time. Let's go Ireland. Let's go rest of the world. Locked down united. Together we stand. God bless us all.

@mcgregormma11 - McgregorNews

🇮🇪 BREAKING: A new poll by Irish newspaper ‘The Liberal’ suggests that Conor McGregor is on course to win Ireland’s Presidential Election in a LANDSLIDE. Almost 60% of respondents said they plan to vote for him in next month’s Election. WOW. This would be HUGE for Ireland! 🔥🔥 https://t.co/rRg5HGi1tP

Saved - August 22, 2025 at 10:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Todd Blanche, Trump's personal lawyer, met with Maxwell in a surprising move as Trump sought a way out. Blanche is friends with her lawyer, and shortly after their meeting, Maxwell was transferred to a more comfortable jail in Texas. It's hard to take her claims seriously.

@davidicke - David Icke

Todd Blanche is Trump's personal lawyer and he was despatched in an unprecedented move to meet Maxwell while Trump was desperate for a way out. Blanche is a close friend of Maxwell's lawyer who was also there. Immediately after this meeting she - a convicted child trafficker also charged with perjury - was moved to the most cushy jail possible in Texas. It would take the most ass-kissing Trump sycophant like Benny Johnson to believe anything she says. Joke.

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

🚨BREAKING: Newly released transcripts show Ghislaine Maxwell testifying that President Trump never acted inappropriately with anyone or received any “massages.” TODD BLANCHE: Did you ever observe President Trump receive a massage? GHISLAINE MAXWELL: Never. TODD BLANCHE: And did you ever hear Mr. Epstein or anybody say that President Trump had done anything Inappropriate with masseuses or with anybody in your world? GHISLAINE MAXWELL: Absolutely never, in any context.

Saved - August 20, 2025 at 8:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss how WiFi might be conditioning humanity to be more susceptible to AI's influence. This insight comes from my 'Everything You Need to Know' tour, which spanned over 15 countries from 2018 to 2019. For the full video and more info, check the links provided.

@davidicke - David Icke

Is WiFi Slowly Conditioning Humanity to be Susceptible to the Influence of AI? In this video, David talks about how WiFi is creating conditions that make humanity more susceptible to the influence of AI in the future. Taken from David's 'Everything You Need to Know' tour, which ran from 2018 to 2019, and featured events in over 15 countries. Sign up here to view the full video - https://ickonic.com/Watch/40 For more information on books, tickets and events, go to https://www.davidicke.com

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Nanobots, smart dust, will infuse all matter around us with information." "these chemtrails, not contrails, chemtrails that come out the back of planes, they started appearing in the late nineteen nineties, now they're freaking everywhere." "Radiation in the atmosphere generated by technology has absolutely soared beyond words since I was a kid, and increases by the day." "cell towers are pouring out frequencies that disrupt human minds." "Exposure to cell phone and wireless WiFi radiation can reduce impulse control and cause violence." "AI is also meant to take people's jobs away on an absolutely vast scale." "One of the longer term goals of this agenda is to replace the biological human body with a synthetic version." "This is a psychological trick called preemptive programming." "We have allowed ourselves to build our own technological prison without realizing that's what it is." "the coming synthetic human."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Google's Ray Kurzweil said this in his description of what's coming. Nanobots, smart dust, will infuse all matter around us with information. Rocks, trees, everything will become these intelligent creatures. There is only one way you are gonna spread nanobots and smart dust over everything in the way he describes, and that's from the sky. And that's why these chemtrails, not contrails, chemtrails that come out the back of planes, they started appearing in the late nineteen nineties, now they're freaking everywhere. My son Gareth took a picture this morning of them over Derby, and I see them all the time. I've been on the edge of the Kalahari Desert and seen them. They're everywhere. Instead of disappearing like contrails, they start to just pan out and pan out and pan out and eventually they start coming down and cover everything in what they contain, which is many many things including nanotechnology, smart dust. And I have seen again and again a clear blue sky turned into a cloudy day just by watching planes crisscross the sky pouring this shite out. And this whole changing of the atmosphere by this explosion of technologically generated radiation is all part of creating this technological sub reality to control human society like people can hardly imagine. Radiation in the atmosphere generated by technology has absolutely soared beyond words since I was a kid, and increases by the day. And it's coming from sources like these that we don't even know about. Things that look like something else, but are actually hiding these transmitters of these frequencies. This is a former DARPA scientist saying that these cell towers are pouring out frequencies that disrupt human minds. Exactly what this grid is meant to do. Exposure to cell phone and wireless WiFi radiation can reduce impulse control and cause violence. What this stuff can do, by interfering with the process of information processing by the human brain, it can change the way people think. They worked out a long time ago, one guy back in the fifties, the frequencies of various states of emotion including rage and depression. And they found that if you fire that frequency across a community, you pull people into that frequency because the brain doesn't know any better. It receives a frequency and it decodes it. It might come from you and it will decode it or it come externally and it will decode it, and you get what that frequency represents. If you fire that across a community and you build people up into a rage because you want a riot on a problem reaction solution scenario, and then you do something to trigger like, you know, you arrest someone, it shouldn't be arrested, or police will beat someone up or whatever. Suddenly that rage is then, which has been built up systematically, technologically, then explodes and you have the riot that you want. The kids all over the world now are being bombarded from every angle with this stuff. And because we are energetic, electromagnetic on this level entities, Anything that disrupts that, disrupts us on every level. This is a guy called Michael Persinger, neuroscientist at a university in Canada who specialized in this subject for decades. He said, for the first time in our evolutionary history, we have generated an entire secondary virtual densely complex environment, an electromagnetic soup that essentially overlaps the human nervous system, which is what it was planned to do all along. And because of this technology, human concentration spans are plummeting. People find it harder and harder to read books, because the books don't give them that electronic digital stimulation the brain becomes addicted to. And what they thought for, well until relatively recently, is once the brain is formed, then that's it, it's formed. That's how it is for the entirety. Now they know the very opposite is true. They know that the brain through something called brain placidity is constantly changing and reforming in the way that it processes information by the information it receives. And what we've had, and my God, I've lived through this, I'm old enough to live through it, remember what it was like before. In ridiculously short time, the brain has been absolutely deluged with information in forms it's never experienced before. And it is rewiring the brain. It's rewiring the brains of children. It's one of the reasons they're scrambled, getting scrambled and all this suicide stuff is coming through. And AI is also meant to take people's jobs away on an absolutely vast scale. When customers skip the cashier line, what happens to the nation's 3,600,000 cashiers? It says about America. But so many jobs are going to disappear and are beginning to disappear. Amazon announced something this week because of AI and technology taking over. And this is the scam. Remember this one. What will happen eventually, is that the scale of job loss will be so fantastic. Do something, what are we going to do? And what will be planned is this, or a form of this. One, what we're going to do is we're going to give everyone a basically money every week or every month. Everyone's going to get a guaranteed income. It won't be anything like what people could enjoy their life with, but everyone's going to have a guaranteed income. A lot of people will say, thank God, I've lost my job, there's no others, AI has taken it all, take the guaranteed income. The idea is that once you take the guaranteed income, continuing to get it depends on your behavior. Something like this is unfolding in China as we speak. So guaranteed income, yeah? And there's no other jobs, are there? You've no other choice, no other jobs because AI's got them all, yeah? Robots got them all, yeah? Don't do that. Don't challenge us, don't question us, don't do this, don't say that because your income will be taken away and you've got no other choice. Is where it's leading. Complete control of humanity and we have been manipulated, not least through not paying attention and I do understand this bit, not appreciating the scale of freaking evil that we're dealing with. We have allowed ourselves to build our own technological prison without realizing that's what it is. We believed it to be technological progress. And then there's the question, what is AI? What is this artificial intelligence? Well, of course, there's algorithmic AI and there's what they call learning AI, where constantly learning, becoming more intelligent and but what is the other levels of AI? This guy is a famous celebrity physicist in America, Kaku, he said fear robots not aliens. I put at the bottom, but what if the aliens are controlling the robots? What if AI is the aliens? What if AI is this force I talked about earlier and AI is its vehicle to enter, assimilate the human mind. I say it is, I go into the books in detail and explain why, but never mind whether it is or whether it isn't. Whatever level you wanna look at AI, we are being invaded. So, control perception, genetic rewire. Know the outcome and you'll see the journey. One of the longer term goals of this agenda is to replace the biological human body with a synthetic version. It's all part of this assimilation into technology. So, know the outcome and you'll see the journey. And what we're seeing now is more and more movies, television programs that are portraying that very world of robotic humans and synthetic humans and synthetic robots As they have been portraying in the movies for year after year after year, the dystopian society and the control and the promotion of robots and transformers and all this stuff. For kids not least, for reasons I explained. What this is, is a psychological trick called preemptive programming. It works like this. The society you want to take people into, even by the standards we're in now, is so massively different to where we are, that that very chasm of difference is a big resistance point for people. You want us to do what? You want to do what? So what you do is you bombard them with movies, programs, any kind of media you can that portrays the world you want them to go into, you want to take them into. And what you're doing is you're making the subconscious and the conscious to an extent familiar with this world you want to take them into. So when it starts to come in for real, that chasm of resistance is not the same because in some way you are kind of familiar with it, you've been made familiar with it. And that's what's happening. And that process is preparing people for the coming synthetic human.
Homepage davidicke.com
Saved - August 4, 2025 at 7:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explore the connections between Moloch, Saturn, and various symbols like the hexagram and the Israel flag, linking them to historical and mythological contexts. I discuss the significance of Saturn in Roman culture and its ties to the festival of Saturnalia, which influenced Christmas traditions. I highlight ancient beliefs that associate Saturn with malevolence and child sacrifice, drawing a parallel to current events in Gaza. I suggest that these connections are more than mere coincidences, urging deeper reflection on their implications.

@davidicke - David Icke

Moloch is Saturn. The hexagram is Saturn. The Israel flag is Saturn. The Rothschilds are named after the hexagram (Saturn) or 'Red Shield' in German. The hexagon is Saturn. The black cube (Mecca) is Saturn. There's a gigantic and permanent hexagon storm at the north pole of Saturn and an 'eye' storm at the south. A major god of Rome was Saturn and the Roman festival of Saturnalia is an origin of Christmas when 'Santa', an anagram of Satan (Saturn), calls on children. Many ancients believed that Saturn symbolised the evil 'god' that created human reality and to whom they sacrificed children. What is happening in Gaza is the mass sacrifice of children. Just a coincidence, nothing to worry about. (See Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told - https://shop.ickonic.com/product/everything-you-need-to-know-but-have-never-been-told-by-david-icke )

Everything You Need To Know But Have Never Been Told By David Icke – Ickonic Shop shop.ickonic.com

@Red_Pill_US - Red Pill USA

What star adorns the statue of Moloch, the Canaanite god tied to child sacrifice? Let that sink in for a moment. It makes you think... https://t.co/2Toc4RU9Ot

Saved - August 3, 2025 at 9:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find myself disagreeing with Nick Fuentes on many points, yet his critique of the fake 'alternative' media is accurate. The Trump regime effectively manipulated MAGA by infiltrating the alternative media, filling it with their supporters, and bending it to their agenda. It seems to have worked well for the Cult.

@davidicke - David Icke

There are many things that Nick Fuentes and I would disagree on, and many that we wouldn't, but his takedown here of the fake and hijacked 'alternative' media with its mega algorithmic support and funding is spot on. The Trump regime knew that to manipulate MAGA, which was contemptuous of the mainstream media, it had to hijack the 'alternative', fill it with its place people, and bend it to their will. That's exactly what has happened. Worked out well hasn't it? For the Cult, that is.

@FuentesUpdates - Fuentes Updates

Tucker's mask slipped, and he forgot for a minute that for eight years he's been pretending to care about the plight of weird kids in their parents basement who are broke and didn't go to an Ivy League school. “I am America. Chicago is America. THAT’S an American story.” https://t.co/cUvRwUV5hP

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes Tucker Carlson for calling him a "weird gay kid in the basement" from Chicago, arguing Carlson is an out-of-touch elite pretending to represent disaffected white people. The speaker claims to be a genuine "disaffected white young white man" who was "red pilled by Trump" and punished for questioning Israel, unlike Carlson and Candace Owens, who only addressed Israel recently. The speaker contrasts his background with Carlson's privileged upbringing and his father's alleged CIA connections. He also contrasts himself with Owens' marriage to British royalty. He accuses Carlson of hypocrisy for mocking people in basements while supposedly caring about issues like credit card debt and home ownership. He highlights his own working-class background and struggles, contrasting it with Carlson's elite connections and Peter Thiel's alleged involvement with the CIA. He states that he had to fight for everything he has, unlike Owens and Carlson who received contracts and jobs through connections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Know what? Here's the other thing. Tucker Carlson said I'm a weird gay kid in the basement. Yeah. And I'm from Chicago. You're right. Well, okay. You're not right about all of that. But I wasn't born with a silver spoon in my mouth. Tucker Carlson says, I have so many trust funds I never have to work. Tucker went to a $45,000 per year private high school, then a $45,000 per year selective Ivy League school in New England. Tucker Carlson's daddy was a Reagan appointee. And then after years of bragging about being an elite, bragging about being so out of touch and so rich, now he's gonna be the spokesperson for all the white people. Now he's gonna roll up his sleeves. I just like to hunt and fish in my log cabin. I care about Klarna and credit card debt. But then when it comes to me, I'm one of the real disaffected white people. You wanna talk about me and them? I am them. He says Nick Fuentes is leading all of the disaffected young white men. I am a disaffected white young white man. I was a precocious, intelligent, young white college student who went to Boston University, who was pro Trump and red pilled by Trump and animated by Trump's message of America first. And I asked questions about Israel and I was punished for it. I did it years before Tucker Carlson started talking about Israel last year. And I sacrificed and I was targeted by the ADL, by the SPLC, by the federal government, by the conservative movement that both Candace and Tucker were a part of. Candace and Tucker had nothing to say about Israel until it became unavoidable last year, not popular but unavoidable. And now they want to gatekeep me out and do this personality attack and say I'm a bitter loser in my basement from Chicago. I'm a kid from Chicago. And they slipped up there because they forgot for one second that they're pretending to be the spokesperson for exactly that kind of person. Tucker's mask slipped and he forgot for a minute that for eight years he's been pretending to care about the plight of weird kids in their parents basement who are broke and didn't go to an Ivy League school living in cities that don't matter like Chicago, not like Washington DC or LA or New York. And that's why he had such disdain and contempt for me in that moment. Between the personality attacks, he's lonely, he's weird, he lives in a basement. I'm sorry, did you guys forget that that's your target audience that you're trying to pander to? Did you forget that for two seconds? And I'm the inauthentic person? I am that person. I am a spokesman for the disaffected white man because I am one and you two are not. Kannes Owens got married to British royalty worth $200,000,000 after meeting him for two weeks on Zoom. What the fuck is even that about? And Tucker Carlson's dad ran the CIA's propaganda empire fighting the Soviet Union. He went and fought with the Contras when he was in college. When I was in college I was doing a webcam show in my friend's dorm room criticizing Israel. So who's the CIA cutout? Who's the inauthentic one? Who's the crazy hateful one? I would never describe a well meaning young white person who's trying to get ahead as a weird kid in his basement from Chicago and what is that supposed to mean? What is wrong with being from Chicago? What is wrong with being weird? What is wrong with living in your basement? That's a lot of people because of the problems you claim to care about. Tucker's at Turning Point USA extolling the predatory nature of usury and how it's preventing young white men from getting homes. And then the week after says you're in your mom's basement. So which is it? So which is it? Do you care about Klarna and people going into debt to order pizzas and home ownership being impossible? Or do you think that's a contemptible low status thing to be ridiculed and mocked? Who's pandering here exactly? Because that wasn't you, you were born to the Swanson family fortune and your daddy who ran the CIA. You know, my dad didn't even graduate college. My dad worked for the Tollway. His dad died of a drug overdose in the seventies. My mother's father was a garbage man in Chicago and he committed suicide. He was a veteran of World War II. Who's the CIA cutout? Who's the poser? Who is America? I am America. Chicago is America. That's an American story. I didn't go to Yale Law School and suck Peter Thiel's dick and then get a signature at a venture capital firm advising Rebecca Mercer and writing Hillbilly Elegy and talking about it at the Aspen Institute. That's your biographical credibility? How many of these disaffected white people that love Trump because he's racist went to Yale Law School and got plucked out by Peter Thiel, whoever he even is. Peter Thiel with his fixation with the Antichrist. This homosexual who's involved with the CIA, who wants to live forever and govern the world with AI. Yeah, that's really relatable. That's really relatable. Do another show with him and Curtis Yarvin. Do another show, do the forty seventh show with J. D. Vance. It's it is insulting and it is insulting to everybody's intelligence for Tucker to sit there and say he doesn't know his dad is in the CIA. For him to say that I'm in the CIA, what a joke, what a sick joke. Especially after everything that's happened to me. And unlike what Candice Owen says, she says, what happened to him when he was 18. What happened to me is ongoing. Okay. Unlike Candace Owens and Tucker, I never got a contract with Ben Shapiro and Rupert Murdoch. I was on Maker Support. I was on Patreon. I was on D Live. I had to fight for everything I have. I didn't get a million dollar contract from Turning Point. I didn't get $20,000,000 from Fox News. My daddy didn't get me a job in Arkansas. So ridiculous.
Saved - July 28, 2025 at 7:29 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

It was ALLOWED to happen so what has followed in Gaza could be 'justified' by Israel 'defending itself'. This has been blatant since day one when the most defended fence on Earth, with sensors that pick up birds and cockroaches, was breached in multiple places with no response.

@abierkhatib - Abier

“Israeli Rafael Ayon had his radio equipment confiscated before October 7th and returned after October 7th. He tried to warn the Israeli army, but was told he was “blocked” from someone “in the top” @academic_la is this true? https://t.co/gp8iSXGnAM

Saved - May 14, 2025 at 2:01 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

What's REALLY in the fake 'Covid' vaccines - and their like? https://t.co/ja6d5JNfuE

Video Transcript AI Summary
**French Summary:** En mars 2021, il a été constaté que les vaccinés devenaient électromagnétiques. En mai 2021, le docteur Pablo Compra en Espagne a découvert des nanoparticules d'oxyde de graphène dans les vaccins Pfizer. En Italie, les docteurs Gati Montanari ont trouvé les mêmes composants inorganiques et d'autres composants non déclarés. En Argentine, Lorena Diblazi et Marcella Sangorine ont fait des découvertes similaires, avec des métaux lourds et 55 composants non déclarés, dont certains mortels. Des recherches en Allemagne, Angleterre, Corée et Australie ont abouti aux mêmes constats. En août 2021, le Japon a retiré des lots de vaccins Moderna à cause d'une contamination. Selon des chercheurs, il s'agirait d'un crime contre l'humanité, avec des nanoparticules en nano réseau auto-assemblés présents dans tous les vaccins anti-covid 19, peu importe le fabricant. Des photos du docteur David Nixon en Australie montrent ces nanoparticules. **English Translation:** In March 2021, it was observed that vaccinated individuals were becoming electromagnetic. In May 2021, Dr. Pablo Compra in Spain discovered graphene oxide nanoparticles in Pfizer vaccines. In Italy, Doctors Gati Montanari found the same inorganic components and other undeclared components. In Argentina, Lorena Diblazi and Marcella Sangorine made similar discoveries, with heavy metals and 55 undeclared components, some of which were deadly. Research in Germany, England, Korea, and Australia yielded the same findings. In August 2021, Japan withdrew batches of Moderna vaccines due to contamination. According to researchers, this is a crime against humanity, with nanoparticles in self-assembled nano-networks present in all anti-covid 19 vaccines, regardless of the manufacturer. Photos from Dr. David Nixon in Australia show these nanoparticles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dernier poster et je termine là-dessus. C'est le poster que vous avez derrière moi, mars deux-mille-vingt-et-un. Un grand nombre de personnes ont réalisé que les individus vaccinés devenaient quasiment tous électromagnétiques à minima au point d'injection. Mai deux-mille-vingt-et-un, en Espagne, le docteur Pablo Compra découvrait par le biais de son microscope électronique à transmission, la présence de 1000000000 de nanoparticules d'oxyde de graphène dans les flacons de Pfizer. En Italie, les docteurs Gati Montanari découvraient les mêmes composants inorganiques avec leur microscope électronique à balayage environnemental. Ils ont également découvert plusieurs dizaines d'autres composants qui ne figuraient pas dans la liste des composants officiels déclarés par les sociétés pharmaceutiques. En Argentine, Lorena Diblazi et Marcella Sangorine ont fait les mêmes découvertes, mais en pire s'agissant des métaux lourds et des composants non déclarés, cinquante-cinq composants non déclarés dont certains sont mortels. En Allemagne, en Angleterre, en Corée ou encore en Australie, même recherche, même résultat, même constat. Rappelez-vous qu'en août deux-mille-vingt-et-un, au Japon, le ministère de la Santé a fait retirer tous les lots des vaccins de la société Moderna en raison d'une découverte de contamination. Mais de quelle contamination parle-t-on Aujourd'hui tous ces chercheurs sont formels, il ne s'agit pas d'une contamination mais d'un véritable crime contre l'humanité. Un crime machiavélique organisé et planifié depuis longtemps. Ce que vous voyez sur ce poster, ce sont les meilleures images que nous ayons actuellement en notre possession. Ces photos représentent les nanoparticules disposées en nano réseau auto-assemblés. Ils sont présents dans tous les vaccins anti covid dix-neuf, peu importe la société pharmaceutique qui les produit. Sinofarm, Sinovac, Turcovaques, n'importe. J'accélère, les photos remarquables que vous voyez là nous viennent d'Australie et ont été prises par le docteur David Nixon. À votre avis, à quoi avons-nous à faire Je vous pose la question et je termine là-dessus, je vous rends la parole et je vous remercie de m'avoir écouté.
Saved - March 14, 2025 at 5:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m not claiming you’re a plant; I just think you have part of the story that fits your narrative. True journalists hold all power accountable, not just those they favor. I’ll join when I choose to. There’s still a lot more to unfold, so get ready.

@davidicke - David Icke

I don't say you are a plant. I don't know that. I say you have a fraction of the story and it suits you not to have more - and what you say suits those you support. Proper journalists don't take private jets to Mar-a-Lago and brag about it. They hold ALL power to account no matter who they are. I'll come on when I decide to. Lots more to happen yet. Strap in.

@rustyrockets - Russell Brand

Please, please come on the show. I know you keep saying I’m a globalist and a MAGA plant, but nothing you say can keep me from loving you. @davidicke

@davidicke - David Icke

What a serious dose of sitting on the fence. It is not about Israel this or that. It's about basic humanity. I don't believe in the Old Testament as an historical document and I don't believe in Islam. What I do believe in is basic humanity and on that basis what the Israeli… https://t.co/5lzbC5VeWH

Saved - January 25, 2025 at 5:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been sharing my thoughts for years, emphasizing that politics isn't the solution but a trap that leads us to surrender our power to a few. With 8 billion people, true control is impossible unless we willingly give it away. Recent actions, like Trump's executive orders affecting millions, highlight this insanity labeled as democracy. If we collectively refuse to comply with oppressive dictates, we strip away the power of politicians. It's crucial to reject the divide-and-rule tactics and respect individual differences without imposing beliefs. The real issue lies in how alternative media often perpetuates the very system they claim to oppose.

@davidicke - David Icke

Read my books, mate. I have been laying it out for decades while people have said 'you never mention solutions'. One crucial point is to stop seeing politics as the answer when that is central to the trap to entice the population to give their power away to a few people or even one. There are apparently 8 billion humans and they can't be controlled by a relative handful unless they hand their power to the few and sit back while they run the show in One-Party States. We now have Trump issuing a blitz of 'executive orders' that impact on the lives of at least 350 million. This is insane and they call it 'democracy'. Imagine if those hundreds of millions and billions refused to cooperate with dictates that deleted the freedoms of them and their families? What power would politicians and their enforcers have then to impose tyranny? None. Instead divide and rule - not least through politics, religion, etc - turn the target population on itself while the One-Party State laughs and guffaws as the people fight while the few pull the strings of society. X is no place for detail, but put down the irrelevant fault lines of divide and rule, stop trying to impose your will on others, respect everyone's right to be different so long as they don't impose their beliefs on others, and stop cooperating en masse with those who are shafting you, your families and your freedom. Politics is not the answer, it is the problem. The psychopaths can pass all the 'laws' they like, but if the people refuse to comply with their own enslavement the 'laws' (Global Cult) have no power. My problem with the hijacked fake 'alternative' media is that those people have been selling you the very system that they claim to oppose - but don't really. They facilitate it.

@Benchipichape - Ben Kramer

@davidicke What's YOUR solution, David???

Saved - January 24, 2025 at 5:55 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

Who is this Ian Carroll guy who often pushes the agenda while claiming to oppose it? Repeating research done by others long, long, ago (while missing the most significant parts) is easy. Understanding what you are talking about is something very different.

@_whitneywebb - Whitney Webb

It is a provable fake out and what the banking cartel has been asking for. Trump's executive order is all about dollar stablecoins being used to extend dollar hegemony and dollar stablecoins are just as programmable, surveillable and seizable as a CBDC, the only difference is that the central bank isn't issuing them directly and it maintains the 2-tier banking system, which is what Wall Street has been lobbying for once digital dollar discussions began in earnest. In the US, mass surveillance is a public-private partnership, why would surveillable digital money be any different? Kudos to @markgoodw_in who called that the dollar stablecoins would be the de facto CBDC several years ago. If you Ian or anyone else reading this is interested, Mark and I dissected why the CBDC was being moved to the private sector in the US in December 2023 in this article (notably this very stablecoin play was a key aspect of the FTX scandal): https://unlimitedhangout.com/2023/12/investigative-reports/unmasking-farmington-ftx-fluent-finance-and-the-coming-digital-dollar/

Unmasking Farmington: FTX, Fluent Finance and the Coming Digital Dollar A former partner of Farmington State Bank, the tiny rural bank embroiled in the FTX scandal, is now building the rails for CBDCs in the Middle East and beyond. Their recent activities may finally reveal the true motives behind Sam Bankman-Fried's and his allies' use of Farmington, with major implications for the coming Digital Dollar. unlimitedhangout.com
Saved - January 16, 2025 at 4:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I struggle to understand why God would sacrifice His only son on a cross to forgive humanity's sins. If forgiveness is possible, why resort to violence? The concept of eternal life for believers raises more questions, especially regarding those who never had the chance to know Jesus, like babies or people from different cultures. It seems unfair that virtuous individuals can be condemned while wrongdoers can be saved simply by belief. The inconsistencies in these beliefs leave me with endless questions that seem to lack clear answers.

@davidicke - David Icke

Why would God sacrifice his 'only begotten son' horribly on a cross 2,000 years ago to forgive the sins of humanity? I'm sure I am not the only one for whom this story makes no sense whatsoever. If you want to forgive 'sin' then forgive it. You are God after all so why the violence? And the 'sin' that you forgive has gone on and on and on and human suffering with it. Why is it that 'whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life'? What about babies who die without having any chance of even hearing about 'Jesus'? What about all the people right across the world 2,000 years ago and since who could never have heard of 'Jesus'? Where is the fairness that if you are virtuous but don't believe in Jesus you are done for, but if you are a right bastard and believe in Jesus you are 'saved' to have 'eternal life'? Where is the fairness in this in John 3:36? 'Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him.' The questions are endless for they make no sense. Please explain without quoting from a Bible compiled by the Roman Church and the origin of which no one knows.

@rustyrockets - Russell Brand

Thank You, Jesus, for your flesh and blood that was shed for me. https://t.co/NCfbNfQNOf

Video Transcript AI Summary
I would love to share communion with you, Dallas and Amanda. What scripture do you suggest for this moment? We recently filmed season 5, which includes the Last Supper. There's a beautiful prayer from Jesus in the book of John. This is John 6:53-56: Jesus said, "Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day." Let's break bread together. Thank you, Lord, for your body broken on the cross and for my redemption through your suffering. We appreciate Dallas and Amanda for sharing their wisdom with us today. Thank you, Jesus, for your sacrifice. As good Christians, we don’t consume actual alcohol.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would love to break bread with you, Dallas Jenkins, and I'd love to invite, Amanda, your wife, to join us. Amanda. Speaker 1: Hello. Speaker 0: So lovely to, meet you. Dallas and Amanda, what bit of scripture would you suggest that I use to undertake our communion? Have you got any thoughts on what you'd like to use? Speaker 1: We just filmed season 5 where they have the Last Supper. There's that beautiful prayer from Jesus that takes that's in the book of John. Speaker 0: This is John 653. Jesus said to them, very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day for my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me and I in them just as the living father sent me. So should we Speaker 2: break bread together now? Thank you that your body was broken on the cross. Thank you that you endured the scourge and the humiliation. Thank you that I'm redeemed by your suffering. Heavenly father, thank you lord for bringing Dallas and Amanda to us today that we can participate in your wisdom through them. Thank you, Jesus Christ, your blood. Thank you that you died for me. Speaker 1: Good Christians, we don't drink the actual alcohol.
Saved - January 10, 2025 at 4:10 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

In two minutes - Why Trump and Musk want to absorb Canada and Greenland. Make the New World Order Great Again (MNWOGA). https://t.co/jmzIDkv5eJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of a North American Union, which aims to merge Canada, the United States, and Mexico, similar to the European Union. This idea gained traction in the 1990s, with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) seen as a precursor to this political and economic integration. Additionally, the Club of Rome, established in 1968, has advocated for centralizing power under the guise of addressing climate and environmental concerns. They proposed dividing the world into regional groups that would ultimately be governed by a world authority, including the fusion of the United States, Canada, and Greenland.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is this really all a bloody bout? Well, I remember, because I'm old and I've been doing this a long time, back in the 19 nineties, when it was very much part of the alternative media, analysis that the plan was for a North American Union, a fusion of Canada with the United States and Mexico, basically, mirroring the European Union because the more you centralize power, the more power the few have over the many. And the line was in the 19 nineties that this NAFTA, North American Free Trade Agreement, was the stalking horse for, eventually, this political economic fusion of those countries. Now here's another map which came out of the the Club of Rome. The Club of Rome was created in 1968 to use concerns about the climate and the environment to justify centralization of power. And, of course, they've done it ever since, and, of course, global warming is all part of that that package, that approach. And they came out with a map of how they wanted to break the world up into, regional groups, which, of course, would be controlled essentially by a world government. And, oh, what did they say? They wanted a fusion of the United States, Canada, and, oh, yes, Greenland.
Saved - January 4, 2025 at 7:34 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

Aren't you a former US Navy Seal and CIA Contractor, Shawn? Isn't Sam Shoemate, the guy you interviewed about the Vegas Cybertruck, an intelligence officer and Chief Warrant Officer 2 (US Army, Retired)? Should we therefore accept everything said without question? Asking for a friend.

Saved - January 4, 2025 at 2:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm starting to see that Musk's idea of 'free speech' on X is really a trap. He's now targeting those who disagree with him and punishing what he calls 'negativity,' which feels like censorship. It's frustrating to watch him post freely while others face consequences for criticism.

@davidicke - David Icke

Are you getting it yet? Musk's 'free speech' X was always a trap and now it is being sprung. First he targets those that disagree with him and now he's punishing 'negativity' which is another way of saying censorship as he deboosts those that expose him and Trump. That's 'negativity', you see, because you are not worshipping the 'gods' who are shafting you. Meanwhile, this fraud can post what he likes every few minutes.

@Gentilenewsnet - Gentile News Network™

"Too much negativity" is being pushed. This platform is for babies now https://t.co/Iox1EcjR2n

Saved - January 3, 2025 at 4:33 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

It was. We live in a simulated reality that we are told to believe is real. It isn't. People pore over a political and financial conspiracy and that's okay, but only to a point. Their very experienced reality is the foundation of the hoax and all other conspiracies come from that. See The Reveal.

@Vision4theBlind - Vision4theBlind

I am starting to believe this was actually a documentary. https://t.co/ZBTK39T4IV

Saved - January 1, 2025 at 6:48 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

World Close to WWIII – Nihilists Unleashed, Eurasia, Putin and the Demonising of Russia (David Icke 2014) https://davidicke.com/2023/03/10/david-icke-world-close-to-wwiii-nihilists-unleashed-eurasia-and-the-demonising-of-russia-2014/

World Close to WWIII – Nihilists Unleashed, Eurasia, Putin and the Demonising of Russia (David Icke 2014) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OYhz5dYw5w [trap-banner] [perc-banner davidicke.com
Saved - January 1, 2025 at 6:48 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

The world is being split into two and NATO wants war with Russia https://davidicke.com/2023/03/19/the-world-is-being-split-into-two-and-nato-wants-war-with-russia/

The world is being split into two and NATO wants war with Russia World War III is building up. Neither the USA nor its NATO partners want peace. Their solitary aim is to destroy Russia. The war in Ukraine has very little to do with Ukraine. It is destroying the economies, lives and resources of the US, the UK and the EU and Russia. The solitary winner is China. While the rest of the world fusses over trivia and minutiae, the third world war continues to spread and to become ever closer to a nuclear war. Ukraine is losing so many men in its designer, proxy war with Russia that NATO troops are soon going to have to move into Ukraine and take over the war. I repeat: if the USA, the EU and the UK all want the war to continue (which they clearly do) they’re going to have to supplement the failing Ukraine forces. If that doesn’t scare you then you need to fetch your brain from wherever you put it. A year ago, Ukraine had over 1,000 tanks, a huge number of artillery guns and its own air force. Now Ukraine is reduced to begging the West for more arms and it doesn’t seem to have much of an air force. Most of what they had has gone. Replacing those weapons from the US, the UK and the EU will take years and cost hundreds of billions of dollars (indeed the American budget for arms this year alone is over $1 trillion). And it will mean that there will be no hardware available for wars against China, Iran and North Korea. Ukraine is reported to have only 300 guns left. The problem is that if their small number of guns are used too often, their barrels will need replacing. Ukraine is also running out of shells despite the fact that the US supplied a million artillery shells. Ukraine now wants 250,000 shells a month from the EU. Ukraine is running out of equipment and ammunition because they were in a war that was running for years before Russia became involved. Russia seems to have plenty of machinery and shells. Read more: The world is being split into two and NATO wants war with Russia [answer-banner] [trigger-banner] davidicke.com
Saved - January 1, 2025 at 6:45 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

NATO to Draw Up Russia War Plans for First Time Since Cold War https://davidicke.com/2023/05/20/nato-to-draw-up-russia-war-plans-for-first-time-since-cold-war-2/

NATO to Draw Up Russia War Plans for First Time Since Cold War NATO is drawing up plans on how to fight a war with Russia for the first time since the Cold War. According to Reuters, at the upcoming NATO summit in Vilnius this July, alliance leaders will approve thousands of pages of secret military plans that will detail how to respond to a Russian attack. The plans will be vastly different than anything drawn up during the Cold War as NATO has expanded from 16 members to 31 since the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact. The documents will also outline how NATO members should upgrade their forces and logistics. “Allies will know exactly what forces and capabilities are needed, including where, what and how to deploy,” NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said of the war plans. NATO’s newest member, Finland, shares an over 800-mile border with Russia and is poised to sign a deal that will give US troops access to its territory. While the alliance is preparing to beef up its presence on its “eastern flank,” one NATO official acknowledged the danger of massing troops near Russia’s border. “The more troops you are massing up on the border, it’s like having a hammer. At some point, you want to find a nail,” said Lt. Gen. Hubert Cottereau, the vice chief of staff for NATO’s Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe. “If the Russians are massing troops on the border that will make us nervous, if we are massing troops on the border that will make them nervous.” Read More: NATO to Draw Up Russia War Plans for First Time Since Cold War [trap-banner]  davidicke.com
Saved - January 1, 2025 at 6:45 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

Russia’s Cyber Gulag: Tracking And Controlling Citizens https://davidicke.com/2023/05/24/russias-cyber-gulag-tracking-and-controlling-citizens/

Russia’s Cyber Gulag: Tracking And Controlling Citizens When Yekaterina Maksimova can’t afford to be late, the journalist and activist avoids taking the Moscow subway, even though it’s probably the most efficient route. That’s because she’s been detained five times in the past year, thanks to the system’s pervasive security cameras with facial recognition. She says police would tell her the cameras “reacted” to her — although they often seemed not to understand why, and would let her go after a few hours. “It seems like I’m in some kind of a database,” says Maksimova, who was previously arrested twice: in 2019 after taking part in a demonstration in Moscow and in 2020 over her environmental activism. For many Russians like her, it has become increasingly hard to evade the scrutiny of the authorities, with the government actively monitoring social media accounts and using surveillance cameras against activists. Even an online platform once praised by users for easily navigating bureaucratic tasks is being used as a tool of control: Authorities plan to use it to serve military summonses, thus thwarting a popular tactic by draft evaders of avoiding being handed the military recruitment paperwork in person. Rights advocates say that Russia under President Vladimir Putin has harnessed digital technology to track, censor and control the population, building what some call a “cyber gulag” — a dark reference to the labor camps that held political prisoners in Soviet times. It’s new territory, even for a nation with a long history of spying on its citizens. “The Kremlin has indeed become the beneficiary of digitalization and is using all opportunities for state propaganda, for surveilling people, for de-anonymizing internet users,” said Sarkis Darbinyan, head of legal practice at Roskomsvoboda, a Russian internet freedom group the Kremlin deems a “foreign agent.” The Kremlin’s seeming indifference about digital monitoring appeared to change after 2011-12 mass protests were coordinated online, prompting authorities to tighten internet controls. Some regulations allowed them to block websites; others mandated that cellphone operators and internet providers store call records and messages, sharing the information with security services if needed. Authorities pressured companies like Google, Apple and Facebook to store user data on Russian servers, to no avail, and announced plans to build a “sovereign internet” that could be cut off from the rest of the world. Read More: Russia’s Cyber Gulag: Tracking And Controlling Citizens [trap-banner]  davidicke.com
Saved - January 1, 2025 at 6:43 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

Russia Launches Its Own CBDC, The Digital Ruble (there are no ‘sides’ in the Great Reset. Same team, same vaudeville) https://davidicke.com/2023/07/19/russia-launches-its-own-cbdc-the-digital-ruble-there-are-no-sides-in-the-great-reset-same-team-same-vaudeville/

Russia Launches Its Own CBDC, The Digital Ruble (there are no ‘sides’ in the Great Reset. Same team, same vaudeville) The wait is over! The Bank of Russia’s centralized, programmable digital token officially received the State Duma’s blessing on Tuesday. Safe and convenient concepts such as “digital ruble platform”, “digital ruble platform participant”, as well as “digital ruble platform user” and “digital account (wallet)”, now have concrete definitions provided by pages and pages of legal mumbo-jumbo. The approved legislation designates the Bank of Russia as the sole operator of the digital ruble platform. The Central Bank will be responsible for all aspects of “Russia’s” CBDC, including functionality, safety, and “the correct accounting” of transactions. Interfax provided some more details about what was included in the final version of the bill: The adopted law clarifies the ban on crediting digital ruble accounts, as well as on the accrual of interest on the balance of digital rubles. It is also prohibited to open joint digital ruble accounts (for several users). The document also establishes the Central Bank’s right to block a platform participant (bank) from conducting a transaction if the regulator suspects it is being carried out without the client’s consent. In this case, the Central Bank will inform the bank or the client about the possibility of sending a second order using the same details and for the same amount. Upon receipt of a repeated order, the Central Bank will be obliged to honor it. In addition, according to the law, the Bank of Russia will be able to enter into agreements with other CBDC operators [i.e., other central banks]—not only of a foreign state, but also of a group of foreign states. By the way: Interfax’s report also featured an interesting comment from first deputy chairman of the Bank of Russia, Olga Skorobogatova, who is very excited about the possibility of creating not just “national” CBDCs, but CBDCs for “a whole space”. And just think: some gullible worrywarts claim CBDCs could undermine what little remains of national sovereignty. The main provisions of the law will come into force on August 1, 2023. The legislation also paves the way for a multi-phase project designed to integrate the digital ruble into Russia’s economy. RBC explained: As stated in the materials on the digital ruble on the website of the Bank of Russia, the Central Bank will introduce [the CBDC] in stages: “First, we need to conduct a pilot on real digital rubles with real clients, and work out basic operations with banks (opening and closing digital wallets, transferring digital rubles between citizens, payment for purchases and services using a QR code). In the future, the range of operations will be expanded. […] The decision to scale the digital ruble will be made based on the results of passing all stages of the pilot and taking into account the feedback from its participants.” A VTB representative told RBC that the testing will take place in “friends and Family” mode—using a small circle of customers and bank employees. Banks will test all the main operations: registering and opening a wallet, replenishing it, withdrawing funds from a digital wallet to a non-cash account, transfers from one client to another, as well as payments and self-executing transactions, according to Alexei Matveev, head of the payment business development department at Alfa Bank. I won’t waste your time explaining why the digital ruble is no different from the digital euro, or the digital peso, or whatever kind of soul-crushing digital token your own government is currently shilling. Yes, there have been valiant attempts by the internet’s most revered intellects to portray the digital ruble as a sanctions-busting, sovereignty-protecting, completely voluntary, extremely friendly and benign digital coin. But unfortunately these Very Serious Pundits are very seriously misinformed. A closing thought before I leave you. Guys, this was huge big news—the digital ruble is now official. It now has a formal legal status. It’s happened. It’s here and it’s probably not going away. For better or worse (probably for worse, but you never know!), the ratification of this law was a historic event. And where’s the coverage? THIS HAPPENED TWO DAYS AGO. I checked RT.com, the #1 source for Russia News. Nothing. (Or maybe I just didn’t see it? Or maybe they are seconds away from filing a report about this momentous event, which occurred almost 48 hours ago?) Come on, now. People seem to be interested in Russia. There is also much interest in CBDCs. But for some reason, when you put these two things together…crickets. Read More: Russia Launches Its Own CBDC [dream-banner] davidicke.com
Saved - January 1, 2025 at 6:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see Jordan Peterson calling for action against Netanyahu, claiming both he and Hamas are controlled by a global cult aiming for war. However, it's frustrating that Peterson seems unaware of this supposed cult and continues to engage positively with Netanyahu.

@davidicke - David Icke

The fake 'alternative' media speaks: 'Give them hell Netanyahu - Enough is enough' - Jordan Peterson. Netanyahu is owned by the Global Cult. Hamas is owned by the Cult. And the Cult wants a war involving Cult-owned Russia-supported, China-supported Iran on the road to WW3.

@jordanbpeterson - Dr Jordan B Peterson

Give 'em hell @netanyahu Enough is enough

@davidicke - David Icke

Where do you start when Peterson doesn't even know there IS a Cult and does fawning interviews with Netanyahu? Clueless.

Saved - January 1, 2025 at 6:42 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

Putin is ‘fighting the globalists’? Oh, do leave off – Russia is becoming a digital dystopia like everywhere else – right in line with the global plan for all humanity https://davidicke.com/2023/10/05/putin-is-fighting-the-globalists-oh-do-leave-off-russia-is-becoming-a-digital-dystopia-like-everywhere-else-right-in-line-with-the-global-plan-for-all-humanity/

Putin is ‘fighting the globalists’? Oh, do leave off – Russia is becoming a digital dystopia like everywhere else – right in line with the global plan for all humanity Things are getting very digital in Russia. For your reading convenience I have decided to compile important updates about Russia’s “digital transformation” into a single blog post. Thank you for reading and have a relaxing Friday. PUTIN SIGNS DECREE ON CREATION OF A “DIGITAL” DOMESTIC PASSPORT Last Monday, Russian President Vladimir Putin approved a plan that will allow Russians to use a digital ID instead of a paper one. The “digital [domestic] passport” (Russia has a domestic passport system) will be stored on the State Services (Gosuslugi) mobile application. Putin’s decree gives the government three months to compile a list of situations in which a digital ID is a valid form of identification. Officials have stressed that the digital passport is completely voluntary and no one will be penalized for using a paper ID. The scheme can be traced back to 2021, when the Ministry of Digital Development proposed the creation of a new form of ID—a physical card with a chip that would replace the paper passport. However, the plan was abandoned because the identity cards were too expensive to make. Last year, Putin instructed the ministry to draft a decree for the introduction of a digital ID. Katyusha.org commented on the introduction of this new QR code-based ID system: It should also be noted that although proponents insist a digital passport is more convenient than a boring paper one, a growing number of Russians feel uneasy about the introduction of electronic identity papers. Read More: Inside Russia’s “digital transformation” [dream-banner] davidicke.com
Saved - January 1, 2025 at 6:41 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

Douglas Macgregor, a military man with a brain, describes the potential sequence to WW3 that I have been warning about for a long, long time - with attacks on Iran bringing in Russia. Ultimately Russian involvement would lead to China coming in. All long-planned.

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

Ep. 33  Looks like we’re actually going to war with Iran. Are we ready for this? https://t.co/Ap09hWnvnj

Video Transcript AI Summary
The U.S. appears to be moving toward war with Iran, with few Republicans opposing this direction. Senator Lindsey Graham advocates for military action against Iran if Hezbollah attacks Israel. Former Colonel Douglas McGregor warns that such a conflict could have severe global implications, including targeting U.S. bases in Iraq and Syria and escalating tensions with Russia. He emphasizes that sanctions on Iran have not diminished its military capabilities. The U.S. military is currently not in a strong position, and any military engagement could lead to significant casualties and regional instability. McGregor stresses the need for careful consideration of the consequences, as collective punishment in Gaza could further unite opposition against Israel and the U.S. He suggests that while some leaders understand the risks, their voices are not being heard in the current political climate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We seem to be heading to war with Iran. Certainly, the Biden administration is pushing us in that direction. What's new and interesting and ominous is that very few Republicans, the opposition party, are pushing back. Instead, some of the party's leaders are encouraging it. Here, for example, is senator Lindsey Graham with South Carolina from last weekend on NBC. Speaker 1: You said this week that the only way to keep the war from escalating is to hold Iran accountable Part of what you're talking about now. Yeah. And that it might mean bombing their oil refineries. Yeah. Have you had any discussions with the Biden administration about this? Speaker 2: A bit. Here's my message. If Hezbollah, which is a proxy of Iran, launches a massive attack on Israel, I will consider that a threat to the, to to the state of Israel existential in nature. I will introduce a resolution in the United States Senate to allow military action by the United States in conjunction with Israel to knock Iran out of the oil business. Iran, if you escalate this war, we're coming for you. Speaker 1: Are you effectively poised to declare war on Iran? That's very strong language. Speaker 2: I am poised to use military force to destroy the source of funding for Hamas and Hezbollah. Speaker 0: No. That's Lindsey Graham. Few others in the Republican party will be that open about their intentions, but very few disagree with him. Certainly not in private. They agree. So what would war with Iran mean? Well, it's hard to know because virtually no one who's talking about it in public is operating from a deep interest in America's interest. Is this good for us or is it not? Former colonel Douglas McGregor is the CEO of our country, our choice, and one of the first people we turn to for analysis of events like this because he is interested in what happens to the United States. He joins us now. Doug, thank you for coming on. Do you think that we are moving toward war with Iran? Speaker 3: Yes. I do. And, it looks like the chosen destination is indeed Armageddon. There doesn't seem to be any real appreciation for the implications for us and and frankly for Europe and the world as well as the Middle East of such action. You know, take for an example just on the economic side, about 20% of the world's oil passes through the Straits of Hormuz every month, probably 25% of liquefied natural gas, and you're talking about shutting down 2 to 3000000 barrels, a day of oil from Iran, you know, this entire region is involved in the war. This is not an Iranian monopoly by any stretch of the imagination. But the point is that when we're looking at 10 year treasury yields up over 5% and people are increasingly convinced that the Fed has lost control, the economic side of the house is catastrophe. Now when you look at the military side, you have to look at the arsenal of missiles that Iran possesses, and they can reach out 1,200 miles with great precision, very high explosive conventional warheads that would do enormous damage, destroying whole city blocks in places like Haifa, Tel Aviv, even Jerusalem, though I doubt they would attack Jerusalem. The the bottom line is that we need to think this through and everyone right now is emoting. There is no thinking anywhere as far as I could tell. The only possible exception may be amazingly enough, mister Erdogan in Turkey who came out this morning and indicated he was willing to mediate, the dispute between Israel and Hamas. Whether or not anyone in Washington or Israel is interested in talking, I don't know. But if we could sideline Turkey and keep Turkey out of the fight, that would ultimately help Israel enormously. Speaker 0: So what would happen to the United States if we followed senator Graham's advice and just begin bombing critical infrastructure in Iran? What what would happen then? Speaker 3: Well, all of the bases that we have in Iraq and Syria, unfortunately, where we still have over a 1000 Americans, all of those would be targeted. And this time, they would target them accurately, and this destruction would be wholesale. I would expect trouble here at home and in the United States because of the open border. Hezbollah has a very large operation in Mexico. There are no doubt many, many, many Hezbollah agents inside the United States. We can only begin to imagine the kind of trouble they could cause. The missile and space program in Iran is very, very advanced as is their cyber warfare capability. All of these things would be brought to bear against us. But what's most important, I think, for Americans to understand is if we attack Iran on the basis of Hezbollah's alleged willingness to attack Israel if Israel invades Gaza, we will end up in a fight with Russia. Russia will not sit by quietly and watch Iran destroyed by the United States air and naval power in the region. And once Russia enters this, it it becomes much more than just a local conflict, maybe more than just a regional war. We haven't thought this through. We need to do that. And I doubt seriously at that point that the Turks would be able to stay out. The Turks are Sunni Muslims. They are the de facto leaders of the Sunni Muslim world. They have the largest armed forces in the region. They are in close proximity to Israel. They could move forces south through Syria very rapidly. And I'm sure Bashar al Assad, assuming he even survives the opening of this campaign, would not obstruct them. Speaker 0: So so many questions. But just to back up one click. You described Iran's missile arsenal, but Iran is a country that's been the subject of very intense sanction regime from the United States increased by the last president Donald Trump. But for a long time, how is Iran still such a powerful country militarily given those sanctions? It sounds like maybe they didn't work. Speaker 3: Oh, no. I think that's that's an important point, Tucker, and you're absolutely right. We place so much value on these sanctions and assume that they have this profound impact. Normally, sanctions harm the population in terms of lowering its standard of living, making life more difficult for the everyday citizen, but it doesn't fundamentally alter the policy or the goals and objectives of the government. And this is something that I don't think we understand. The same thing is true for for Hamas and Gaza. You know, you you want to go after Hamas. You want to destroy it. I think everyone with a sound mind is interested in the destruction of Hamas. But do you want to kill 100 of thousands of people in order to get at Hamas? That's the question. We have the same problem in Iran. Our sanctions have not harmed the regime's ability to develop and build very, very complex and sophisticated missiles. These missiles are very accurate now. There are 100, if not 1,000. And the long range missiles, the 1200 mile range theater ballistic missiles are a very serious threat to us in the region and to Israel, and the sanctions have had no impact there. If anything, the Iranians have pulled together the best human capital in their country, the best engineers, the best thinkers, and put them to work primarily on missile technology and on cyber warfare. And that's where we stand right now. We have to expect the worst as a result if we strike Iran. Speaker 0: How is the US military do you think, having spent your life in it, leading troops in combat and at the Pentagon, positioned to respond to war with with Iran right now? Are we in a strong position or not in your view? Speaker 3: No. I don't think we're in a strong position. I think we're probably at the weakest point in, our recent history. I think you've got to look at the realities of new weapon systems, new capabilities. The United States Navy, if it's going to preserve its capability at sea, is probably going to be compelled to operate somewheres north and west of Sicily. If it comes within closer range, then it falls into this envelope where the Iranians can strike it. And as I said before, we have to assume the Russians will come into this. Once you move into the Eastern Mediterranean, you are vulnerable to the Kinshah missiles and other missiles, cruise missiles, and hypersonic missiles that the Russians have. This makes it very difficult to fly strikes in support of the Israeli Defense Force against Hezbollah Because now you're flying a very long distance, you deliver your ordinance, you have to land in Israel in order to refuel. Israel is going to operate under a hail, if not a rainstorm of missiles and rockets, making it very, very dangerous to do so. So our naval power, while substantial, may not have the desired impact on the ground that we would like. And then finally, we have no real army anymore. The army is down to perhaps, what, 450,000. How much of that is ready to fight is open to debate. Much of it is sitting in Eastern Europe right now. We we don't have the means to rapidly ship a large force of 80 to a 100000 troops on the ground into the region, which means that we're reliant on special forces and right now 2,000 marines and perhaps 2,000 special forces and special operations forces. That's not gonna make much of a dent. And as we've seen quite recently within the last 24 hours or so, some of our special ops forces and Israeli special ops forces went into Gaza to reconnoiter, to plan for where they might want to go to free hostages and and make an impact, and they were shot to pieces and took heavy losses as I understand it. I think that's where we're headed, and I don't see that as a win for Israel in any way, shape, or form, and I certainly think it's very dangerous for us. You know, as I've tried to point out to a number of people, until Britain end entered World War 1, it was just a another European war. Once Britain entered it, it became a global war. Well, once we are a cobelligerent, we enter this thing, it's gonna be very difficult for Russia and Turkey not to also come into this fight against us because they will not tolerate the sort of collective punishment that Israel plans for Gaza. Speaker 0: The US military does have an awful lot of generals, however, as you pointed out, multiples of the number we had the absolute number we had during World War 2. And they're paid to think about this stuff. It why has it dawned on no one apparently who's spoken publicly anyway that this this could this could really harm our country gravely? Why is no one saying that? Speaker 3: Well, I'm sure there are people in the US military who are aware, but let's be frank. Most of the people at the top of the military have never operated under artillery fire or rocket fire. They haven't seen direct fire combat. They haven't seen real war per se. Remember, we've had the luxury of sitting around forward operating bases and striking opponents that were armed with AK 40 sevens and command detonated mines, an occasional mortar or rocket. Very, very low intensity combat. This is a high end conventional war that we're looking at with the potential to go nuclear, which obviously I don't think we or the Russians want to happen, but we have the wild card in Israel. They do have a nuclear capability. We don't know what the trip wire is for them to employ such a weapon. At that point, of course, all bets are off and and I think most of the world would turn against Israel. Right now, they just have to worry about the Muslim world against them. It would certainly widen if they went that far. This there are too many unknowns and uncertainties here. And, you know, everyone always assumes at the beginning of such a conflict, well, it'll be contained. We'll only have to fight these people, Hamas, maybe Hezbollah. It never works out that way. These things always last longer than everyone thinks. The resources required are much more profound than what we anticipated. And remember, we've already used up many of our war stocks in Ukraine, and we've left Ukraine in a state of ruins, places on life support, a half a 1000000 dead. What are we going to do to Israel if we press ahead down this road? And it seems listening to secretary of state Blinken this morning, who more and more sounds like our commander in chief, that there is no room for negotiation, no room for mediation. Hamas must be destroyed. We must go into Gaza. If so, I think we're on this very dangerous road to Armageddon. Speaker 0: What is the objective of the IDF and of of Blinken, of the United States and Israel in this short term? Destroy Hamas, but what is what does that mean? Speaker 3: Well, to destroy Hamas in the minds, I think, of policymakers in Washington as well as in Israel is to systematically root them out and kill them in Gaza. Mhmm. Now let's be frank, when you go into an urban environment, you can't pick or choose your targets very easily. First of all, no matter how well trained you are, you're moving into an area that is rubbled. They're ruins. It's very difficult to negotiate in that when I say negotiate, I mean negotiate the terrain through the rubble. You don't know where the enemy is going to pop up. Once you destroy all these buildings, he can be anywhere. So you're gonna take losses going in. But more important, once you start going in there, you're gonna end up killing whatever you find because the soldier, the Israeli soldier, the American soldier, very much the same, they want to live. They wanna survive. When in doubt, pull the trigger. They're not going to stop and say, now wait a minute. Before I shoot, I really need to think about this because that may be a civilian or there may be a family there. That's not gonna happen. You can't expect that. So the notion that this is, a a kind of warfare that is so precise that it can void avoid so called collateral damage is just nonsense. We can't expect miracles from the IDF or our own troops, which means that you're gonna annihilate everything in Gaza. And remember the Israelis would like to push the population out. The problem is when you push the population out, if you did into Egypt, you're gonna run into trouble with the Egyptians. But even if you manage to get them there, you're only moving the problem that confronts you 20 miles, 30 miles away. In other words, killing people isn't going to solve the problem, but it's very attractive at the moment and it's very difficult to talk people out of it. Speaker 0: Do do you believe American troops will be engaged, physically present in the invasion of Gaza? Speaker 3: I'm sure they will because we have American citizens who are hostages, and we've already made it clear that we will assist and support the Israelis in freeing those hostages. Again, the problem is, how do you get the hostages out when you're fighting in this extraordinarily dirty and complex environment? What's to prevent the hostages from simply being executed as soon as you move in force into Gaza? I think the Israelis know that. I think our leadership in Washington knows it. They may have even decided that if that happens, that's tragic, but the ultimate goal of destroying Hamas demands this. Again, it's the issue of collective punishment. I would encourage Americans everywhere to listen to King Abdullah of Jordan's speech in Cairo just a couple of days ago, where he made it clear that he agreed with the, you know, the abhorrence of what had happened in Israel and loathes Hamas for its barbarity and savagery. But he also goes on to point out that collective punishment meted out to 2,000,000 people is unacceptable both under international law and for humanitarian reasons. That's the problem. And as Americans see more destruction and more and more film footage and photographs come out of Gaza showing children, women, old men dying, being killed, the support for Israel is going to erode. And at the same time, the anger and hatred inside the region, which already dislikes Israel, is going to be phenomenal. So Israel is doing something that I think no one has ever accomplished, at least not in my lifetime, and that is uniting Sunni and Shia against itself. That's why I think we have an obligation to save Israel from itself, but that's not a popular position. Right now, it's bombs away and everyone is cheering. Speaker 0: What about the argument often articulated including by leading presidential candidates recently, that considerations like the ones you just raised, like the long term effects of decisions or global public opinion, downstream terror attacks. Thinking about any of that is a violation of principle and you're basically giving into the terrorists by weighing any of it. How would you respond to that? Speaker 3: Most politicians, follow public opinion. Right now, public opinion supports violence against Hamas. And if that includes the destruction of Gaza, so be it. We support it. Very few people look beyond that and understand the larger consequences. In the last century or I I guess I should say in the early 20th century, the great powers intervened on more than one occasion to prevent Turkey from being destroyed, not because they loved the Ottoman Turks, but because they saw the alternative being chaos. Turkey had a role to play. Therefore, we want to preserve it. We have to think about Egypt. Egypt has been a good strategic partner for Israel. They've kept the peace there for decades. The Egyptians are now in a very difficult position. At least a 100000 Egyptian troops have been moved towards the border with Gaza involving several divisions. Under great pressure from public opinion in the Arab world, in the Muslim world, they may have to engage the Israelis because no one will protect the population in Gaza. That that's a terrible terrible possibility, one that we don't want. Because if that happens to Egypt and Hezbollah attacks from the north, that will bring in everyone else. And we're suddenly confronting a war on a regional level that is going to harm us economically, physically in many ways, but could threaten the very existence of Israel, which I think is the root problem here. We don't want Israel's existence threatened. We want to save Israel. We want to keep it intact, but we may not be able to do that if this war runs out of control. And let's be frank, historically, wars run out of control. They move in directions you never anticipated. So if you think you can plot this this route forward as Lindsey Graham thinks, you're crazy. Once this is unleashed, it's not manageable anymore. Speaker 0: You you, said a couple of you made reference a couple of times to the American citizens being held by Hamas. What do we know about them? Speaker 3: Well, I think most of them, are American citizens who happen to be Jewish, who are there to celebrate, during the holiday period or participate in this music festival we've heard so much about. You know, I I don't think they ever anticipated anything like this happening. Yeah. The problem is, as we've said before, extracting them from this haystack is is nigh on to impossible. Speaker 0: What about the concerns of about terrorism in the United States in the wake of all of this? Speaker 3: Well, I think they're very valid. Yeah. I I think these concerns are very, very valid. We've had open borders now for the last two and a half years, but we've had an illegal, migration problem for the last 3 plus decades. We don't know who's in the country. We really don't. No one at homeland homeland security can tell you who is here. The Europeans face something quite similar. They were bullied into admitting millions of Muslims from the Middle East and Africa. We've been bullied by our government to open the borders and let in effectively anybody who wants to come. So we don't know who's here, but we do know that Hamas as well as Hezbollah have positions in Mexico. Of the 2, Hezbollah is much stronger, much larger, and much better equipped and financed. So we have to expect that once Hezbollah is in the war and we are against them and Iran, that much of our infrastructure will be at risk. Something is bad or potentially even worse than 911 could happen here. This brings us back to the whole issue of immigration and border security. We've essentially ignored it. The same politicians who are pushing for war against virtually everyone in the Middle East, which is what it boils down to in the final analysis, don't seem to have thought carefully about protecting us or our borders from all of the terrible things that we've seen in Israel. How much damage could these same people do to us in a shopping mall in the space of 15 minutes? It doesn't take much imagination to understand how dangerous this is. Speaker 0: Do you think that this war, if it comes, and it as as you said, it seems like it is, how will that affect American domestic politics? Work traditionally has been used by the people in power to shut down dissent. Can you imagine that happening in this case? Speaker 3: Well, I think they'll try. Fortunately, thanks to people like Elon Musk who bought Twitter and ended the censorship or suspended it, the truth does get through and reach Americans. But Americans will figure out pretty quickly if two things tend to happen at once. You have the the war overseas and the war here, but remember the economy and the and the financial condition right now. If you turn on any of the business channels for the first time in my memory, lots and lots of analysts are coming on and talking about the Fed having lost control, the rising interest rates, you know, the inability, to manage and cope with the sovereign national debt of 33,000,000,000,000. And that's the tip of a proverbial iceberg. We already have Americans who are struggling with inflation anyway. Now we're looking at potentially scarcity. We've drained our strategic oil reserve for all intents and purposes. If the Strait of Hormuz is shut down, if the Suez Canal is closed, we're in a lot of trouble in the short run. That's for sure. How rapidly can we recover from all of this? How many refineries can we put back into operation? How much drilling can we do quickly? The answer is not very much. So draining that strategic oil reserve was a very serious mistake. Speaker 0: But we'll be as we become impoverished and chaotic and subject to these terror attacks, we'll be winning important moral victories. Don't you think? Speaker 3: Well, in our effort to stand at Israel's side and help protect Israel, we have taken a different route and cast moral turpitude to the side. In other words, how do you help one without committing a war crime against the other? This is the problem with collective punishment. This is the problem with annihilating Gaza and trying to sweep out its population. That's unacceptable to us as Americans. I don't think if you sat down any of Israel's most ardent supporters in the United States and said, are you willing to trade the lives of several 100000 people in Gaza, for the lives taken in Israel by Hamas. After all, Hamas and Palestinian Jihad were the fighters. They lost 1500. There were 3,000 involved in the several waves of the attack. They're dead. Now we're looking at perhaps 5,000 civilians dead. How many more will we witness? Is that somehow or another justified morally? And I think a lot of Americans will struggle with that. That's why I say it would be best if we had a cooling off period. I'm glad that the Israelis are waiting for additional naval power to arrive, on station in the Mediterranean and also for additional equipment, theater, ballistic missile, defense, and so forth. But we need to use this time to think carefully about how far we want to go because right now it's a one way street to regional war. And I don't think anybody really wants that if they think about it carefully. Therefore, you know, looking at someone like Erdogan, however slippery we may consider him to be, his willingness to mediate is a bright light in in an otherwise very dark sky, and we should look to that because we don't want the regional war. It will destroy us economically. We're already in bad shape. We've already suffered because of the foolish intervention in Ukraine to try to destroy Russia. Now we have Russia more powerful militarily than it's been since the eighties, and it's poised to enter on the side of Iran. We should all give that some serious thought. Speaker 0: Last question. Do you know of any leaders in the United States, political leaders at the Pentagon, within the Biden administration, who are thinking clearly about this, which is to say who are framing their thoughts on it around what's best for the United States long term? Is anybody thinking that way? Speaker 3: Yes. Yeah. Yes. There are. The problem is none of them hold high positions in government, and none of their voices or their analyses or their viewpoints are going to reach anybody in power. I think you have to listen carefully to what secretary of state Blinken said. He was absolutely unambiguous. We are going to destroy Hamas, whatever that takes. That means regional war, frankly. And anybody who thinks that people are going to say, oh, no. We're afraid of America. We're not going to risk that. They're wrong. They are not afraid to risk attacking Israel for fear of coming into confrontation with us. We are not the power we were in 1991 and they know that. And economically, our position is very fragile. Let's face it. So the bottom line is, yes, there are people out there, but they're not being heard and they're not going to be heard in the current environment. Speaker 0: Doug McGregor, thank you so much for that. Appreciate it.
Saved - January 1, 2025 at 6:39 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

Anyone with a brain and a backbone is the answer: Who would be exempt from conscription if we went to war with Russia? https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/who-would-be-exempt-from-conscription-if-we-went-to-war-with-russia/ar-BB1heMB1?ocid=winp1taskbar&cvid=98c5a353caf042ba9e88855bfcdc06a1&ei=26 https://t.co/u8tkFQuKgv

Saved - January 1, 2025 at 6:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I question the notion that Putin and Russia are separate from global dynamics. The first Global Future 2045 Congress in Moscow in 2012 gathered over 50 leading scientists to discuss a vision for humanity's future, aiming to create a global network focused on cybernetic technology. Their goal was to transfer human consciousness to artificial carriers and develop a new mankind through advancements in various technologies. This vision parallels today's discussions at the World Economic Forum about the Fourth Industrial Revolution, suggesting that Putin and Russia are indeed part of the global narrative.

@davidicke - David Icke

Putin and Russia are different and not part of the same global game? You must be joking. The first Global Future 2045 Congress (part of Russia 2045) was hosted in Moscow in February, 2012, when more than 50 of the ‘world’s leading scientists’ met to discuss the ‘future development of humankind’. The arrogance needs no comment, but what was this ‘development’? Ahh … ‘to construct a global network of scientists to further research on the development of cybernetic technology, with the ultimate goal of transferring a human's individual consciousness to an artificial carrier’. A ‘new mankind’ had to be created with a ‘technological revolution’ and ‘social transformation’ achieved through the focus on ‘nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology, cognitive technology, genetics and robotics’. This would mean new sources of energy, new architecture and transportation and allow ‘unprecedented developments in new cognitive abilities, refined artificial intelligences and brain-computer interfaces, simulate complex systems, create humanoid robots and cyborgs’, and transfer a human personalities to an ‘artificial carrier’. This would require a new civilisation or paradigm, new philosophy and ideology, new ethics, new psychology, new culture, and we must reset our limits to go beyond the Earth and the solar system. Reset in Moscow in 2012 as they described today's WEF ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’ to create the era of ‘neohumanity’ by 2045-2050. Same, old, same old. Putin and Russia are part of the game. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01hbkh4hXEk&t=50s

Saved - January 1, 2025 at 6:33 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

If you think China-Russia dominated BRICS is 'different' to the West this is an essential read - more masks on the same face kidding you they are an 'alternative' (see also Trump-Harris, Conservative-Labour, Musk-Zuckerberg etc, etc) https://off-guardian.org/2024/11/02/would-you-like-to-know-what-brics-just-declared/

Would you like to know what BRICS just declared? BRICS just wrapped up its 16th summit in Kazan. Probably you heard about this momentous event from meticulously researched independent media articles discussing how BRICS just delivered a DOUBLE DE… off-guardian.org
Saved - January 1, 2025 at 6:33 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

REALLY? You don't say ... "Israeli ground forces cross into Syrian territory for the first time in 50 YEARS to 'act as peacekeepers' as the country falls into chaos after rebel groups forced their dictator to 'flee to Russia with his family'". Just a coincidence, nothing to worry about. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14171931/Israeli-ground-forces-cross-Syrian-territory.html

Israel crosses into Syria for first time in 50 years as chaos hits Troops seized a buffer zone in the Golan Heights established by a 1974 ceasefire agreement with Syria, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed on Sunday. dailymail.co.uk
Saved - December 28, 2024 at 6:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I have been banned from speaking at a Dutch PEACE rally this weekend, contradicting previous government statements that allowed my participation via video. The organizers were informed they cannot play my address due to my ban, which I see as censorship. The Mayor of Amsterdam, Femke Halsema, cited concerns about public order and my past statements as reasons for this decision. Despite the government's failure to link my ban to anti-Semitism, they continue to restrict my voice while others in the alternative community are free to speak.

@davidicke - David Icke

BREAKING ... I am now banned from speaking at a Dutch PEACE rally this weekend on VIDEO. This is in direct contradiction to what the government has said in a stream of court hearings challenging my now Dutch-instigated 4-year ban from most of Europe. I quote from government lawyers Pels Rijcken: 'The Minister also points out that Icke can participate in events physically, by telephone or digitally in/from the United Kingdom.' But no longer. My speech was due to be played on a big screen at the event, but organisers have now been told in this letter that they cannot play an address from anyone banned from the country - i.e. ME. Why are the Dutch authorities so terrified of me while others in the 'alternative' can move around the Netherlands and Europe as they like? The Netherlands exposes itself still further as a tyrannical state with an UNELECTED prime minister - a former head of Dutch Intelligence - and with its biggest party called the 'Party For Freedom' (inversion). Its leader is 'alternative' hero Geert Wilders and one of its members is Marjolein Faber who is the Immigration Minister driving my ban. What is happening here is censorship on a scale that beggars belief. Before you read this nonsense from the Mayor of Amsterdam it is worth noting that the Dutch government is no longer claiming that my ban is due to 'anti-Semitism' because try as they did they couldn't make it stand up. It doesn't stop this idiot, though. The letter from Femke Halsema, Mayor of Amsterdam: Dear Mrs. Ottenhof, You have announced your intention to hold a demonstration in Amsterdam on Sunday, December 29, with 1,500 participants. You start at 11:30 am on Dam Square with more than seven speakers. At 1:30 PM you will leave for Museumplein where you will end the demonstration at 3:00 PM. In addition to the notification, you have applied for an exemption for five vehicles. As far as I know, this exemption has not yet been granted to you. As far as we know, you have not applied for or obtained an object permit. In addition, you have announced online that David Icke will speak (via video) on Dam Square during your demonstration. This announcement has led to shocked and concerned reactions in society, and in particular in the Jewish community. Mr Icke is known for spreading anti-Semitic ideas and there were previously concrete indications that his arrival poses a threat to public order. For this reason, the State Secretary for Justice and Security has denied Icke access to the Netherlands and all countries in the Schengen area. The State Secretary could rely on a report from the police and two reports from the National Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Security (NCTV). According to the NCTV, the theories used by Icke lead to dehumanization of opponents, extremism and violence and thus to a threat to public order. Your organization has already demonstrated several times in Amsterdam, with several hundred demonstrators present each time. This time you expect 1500 participants. In response to the announcement that Mr Icke will give an online speech, the police are taking into account counter reactions that are not reported and can arise spontaneously. Given the unrest and protests caused by his anti-Semitic ideas and the statements he has made in the past, it is expected that his online presence will also provoke (spontaneous) opposition this time. Given the crowds in the city this Christmas holiday, this could lead to (physical) confrontations and uncontrollable situations during your demonstration. The police therefore take great account of the fact that disorder can arise and that action must be taken to prevent or end it. The police indicate that police action in such a situation entails additional risks. Visiting address Amstel 1 1011 PN Amsterdam PO Box 202 1000 AE Amsterdam Telephone 14 020 http://amsterdam.nl Municipality of Amsterdam December 27, 2024 Page 2 of 3 The decision to deny Icke access to the Schengen area has now been tested in court and recently extended by the minister. By giving Icke an online platform on Dam Square, you undermine the minister's decision and the Amsterdam triangle does not wish to facilitate that. Moreover, the public competent authority cannot act effectively if Icke makes criminal statements. After all, in such a situation he cannot immediately be arrested and prosecuted within the Dutch legal order. This may mean that you can not only undermine the minister's decision and a court ruling, but that the Dutch rule of law cannot immediately intervene in the event of possible criminal offenses during your demonstration. The police are in contact with you about your responsibility as an organizer of a large demonstration, and the possibilities of Amsterdam as a city to facilitate freedom of expression. In response to the concerns of the triangle, you have stated that you will stick to your intention to have Mr Icke speak online on Dam Square. In consultation with the Public Prosecution Service and the Chief of Police, I have decided that you may not use facilities for online speakers during your entire demonstration. I do this on the basis of the Public Manifestations Act and the fear of disorder motivated above. I specifically attach the following regulations to your demonstration to prevent disorder. I do this on the basis of the Public Manifestations Act. ● In accordance with your notice, you may demonstrate on Sunday, December 29 from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. in Amsterdam. You will meet at Dam Square at 11am. ● Physically present speakers may use sound amplification. ● You may not use facilities intended to allow online speakers (with entry bans) to speak publicly. This means that an LED screen is not permitted during your demonstration and sound amplification is only permitted for physical purposes speakers present. ● After the speakers, you will start the police-coordinated route through the city no later than 1:30 PM on Museumplein. ● Your demonstration will end no later than 3 p.m., after which the participants will participate in your demonstration to break up; ● You ensure that no deviation is made from the route while walking the route the demonstration keeps moving and prevents groups of participants from splitting off manifestation; ● You are responsible for organizing a law enforcement service that ensures that the participants in your demonstration fully comply with the agreements made; ● Afterwards, leave the demonstration location clean and empty. In addition, if necessary, pursuant to Article 6 of the Wom, I can give instructions during your demonstration that must be observed without delay. Partly with a view to protecting your demonstration, it is important that instructions given by me through the police are immediately followed and that this regulation is observed. Municipality of Amsterdam December 27, 2024 Page 3 of 3 Amsterdam stands for the fundamental right of freedom of expression and the right to demonstrate. I will protect your demonstration, as well as any opposing views. However, your right to make your voice heard also comes with responsibilities. The right to demonstrate may not be abused to commit criminal offenses and/or to disrupt public order. I would like to point out that the Amsterdam triangle does not tolerate physical confrontation or criminal expressions. It is important that police instructions are followed immediately. I emphasize that failure to comply with a regulation or instruction is a punishable offense and is also a basis for terminating your demonstration. I therefore expect that you will do everything in your power to ensure that the demonstration runs in an orderly manner and that you inform all your participants of any set limits. Yours faithfully, Femke Halsema, Mayor of Amsterdam

Home Officiële site van de gemeente Amsterdam met informatie over onze diensten en het bestuur. amsterdam.nl
Saved - December 28, 2024 at 2:33 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

Oh, the mask is slipping. Lovely man. Don't challenge 'God' or he'll throw his toys from his pram. https://t.co/FeH3967h7k

Saved - December 28, 2024 at 6:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The human hive mind evolves daily, shaping our thoughts and feelings. Control manifests through perception, while technology advances. I'm left questioning the reality of things like 'Covid' vaccines and the concept of AI-human fusion. What do you think?

@davidicke - David Icke

The human hive mind goes on being advanced step-by-step, day-after-day. What are you thinking and feeling? Whatever they decide that you do. This is the stadium in which human control plays out - perception - and technological potential goes on advancing. 'Covid' fake vaccines anyone? AI-human fusion?

@EO_Nutrition - Elliot Overton

WATCH: U.S Military/DARPA developed synthetic viruses, nanotechology and nano-robots for the purpose of controlling human thoughts, emotions, beliefs and behavior This is "Cognitive Warfare" and its being used against you by intelligence agencies They want control of your brain https://t.co/YLJa6kS8kC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The potential to use directed energy and nanotechnology to influence brain physiology and behavior is significant. Small robotic units can be aerosolized to penetrate biological membranes and enter the vascular system, potentially weaponizing thoughts and emotions. Understanding brain function allows for the development of drugs that can enhance performance or induce dysfunction in adversaries. Techniques like brain-machine interfaces could enable real-time manipulation of brain activity. Additionally, engineered neurobugs could disrupt individuals psychologically and neurologically. Nanoparticulate matter can be aerosolized for stealthy delivery, complicating attribution. Neuroscience and technology may be employed in various contexts, including interrogations and public spaces, raising ethical questions about their use for non-lethal interventions that reduce aggression and promote cooperation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is the possibility to use some form of directed energy to affect physiology peripherally and also to affect the physiology and health of the brain. I can create small robotic units, controllable robotic units at the nano scale and that these too can be aerosolized to create a nano swarm of biopenetrable materials that you cannot see that are able to integrate themselves through a variety of membranes, mucus membranes, and wherever, mouth, nose, ears, eyes, can be then uptaken into the vascular system to create clumping, can affect the vascular system of the brain or can directly diffuse into the brain space, and these can be weaponized. Agents that will either change individuals' thoughts, vulnerabilities, volatility to violence and aggression, or incur morbidity, dysfunction, and or mortality in such a way as to then mitigate the engagement altogether. The brain is and will be the 21st century battlescape in many ways. End of story. It's not just a question of trying to figure out what makes the brain tick in the way it's built. It's can we get in there to affect the ticking and talking, and by affecting the way that brain is built and the way it functions, influence in ways that are kinetic and non kinetic the attitudes, beliefs, thoughts, emotions, activities, and relative vulnerabilities and predispositions. The more I know about you and the more I know about the way your brain works as individuals, groups, communities, even populations, the more I can utilize non kinetic means such as informational means of narratives, iconographies, semiotics, to influence your emotions and your behaviors. We can do this subliminally through computer images. We can do this more liminally through the types of engagements, interactions that we engage through psychological operations and informational operations. We can go further than that as well. We can also utilize these interventional technologies in those ways that may able to directly affect the brain. Probably the one that you've heard about most recently, most contemporously in the literature, is the possibility to use some form of directed energy to affect physiology peripherally and also to affect the physiology and health of the brain. And there are a number of countries that have developed initiatives and agenda towards developing just these types of things, the United States included. The more we understand the specificity of the brain on a very granular level, the more we're able to derive and develop particular types of drugs that not only can enhance and optimize the performance of our people, but can also be used to mitigate, militate, and in some cases, manifest profound morbid changes in their people. In other words, against the hostile other. We can go further to implant certain brain machine interfaces. These are many of the DARPA programs that you may hear of now. The idea here is to put minimal sized electrodes in a network within a brain through only minimal intervention to be able to read and write into the brain function in real time, remotely. The United States is not alone in such effort. So how then can we use these elements as weapons? And we can do that in a number of ways. We can militate their behaviors and their thoughts in some ways just to make them more amenable to what we do, the idea of positive weaponology. Or we can, in fact, mitigate, and in some cases, completely nullify their capability, will, or engagement to fight. If we combine those two definitions into 1, what you'll find is those agents that will either change individuals' thoughts, vulnerabilities, volatility to violence and aggression, or incur morbidity, dysfunction, and or mortality in such a way as to then mitigate the engagement altogether. So, in other words, this can also be weaponized against others. And this is where we get into the idea of novel neuro weapons. Once again, this is not necessarily new, but the momentum of this dimension of the field has accelerated as a consequence of increased understanding of the brain and increased capability to develop tools and techniques to access and affect the brain. We see in close neuro pharmaceuticals and organic toxins. More specifically, perhaps, might be targeting individuals on a level that allows either direct attribution or covert engagement with non attribution. I could also incur much broader type of ripple effects. And one of the ways I could also do that is with what's called high morbidity neuromicrobiologic agents. It's a real fancy way of saying neurobugs. But high morbidity neurobugs. I may not want to kill a lot of people. In fact, arguably, I may assume what is sometimes referred to as the Sailor Malin mantra. I can use a particular bug that I may be able to now modify through the use of gene editing technique that is ubiquitously available and fairly easy to use to take a bug that was previously relatively benign and nonpathogenic and make that bug virulent, pathogenic, dangerous. And then what could I do? I could introduce that bug in key sites, but I'd want to make sure that at least part of the symptomatic constellation was not only neurological, it was profoundly psychological. Agitation, debilitation, sweating, stomach problems, sleeplessness, cardiac problems, things that are very top down neurological in their effect, brain to body and body to brain in the bottom up cascade. I can disrupt an individual from the level of their cell to their system and disrupt individuals on a variety of levels from individuals all the way up to the social fabric. And that social fabric may go even further. It may be geopolitical. We can even go further. One of the newest developments is that nanoparticulate matter can be stabilized for distribution. If you're not aware of what nanoparticulate matter is, it's that matter which exists on a scale of 1 times 10 to the minus 9th. Very, very small. Smaller than a cell. And we can manufacture materials that have discrete properties that can be controlled by virtue of bioengineering in their physical chemistry. To auto aggregate, to be able to aggregate in particular areas based upon their biological and or chemical sensitivity. But now we go one step further. Most recently, just a few weeks ago, it was announced that you could then aerosolize nanomaterials. And go one step further, I can create small robotic units, controllable robotic units at the nano scale and that these 2 can be aerosolized to create a nano swarm of biopenetrable materials that you cannot see, that can penetrate all but the most robust biochemical filters, that are able to integrate themselves through a variety of membranes, mucus membranes, and wherever mouth, nose, ears, eyes can be then uptaken into the vascular system to create clumping, can affect the vascular system of the brain or can directly diffuse into the brain space, and these can be weaponized. And they can be done in such a level that their presence is almost impossible to detect. And as such, the attribution becomes exceedingly difficult to demonstrate. But let's keep going. Could I also utilize a whole host of devices to be able to affect individuals close in? For example, during interrogations, during social engagements, during human terrain team engagements, or more remotely, in a room, in a theater, in an airplane, in a bus, in a store, in a mall? The answer is increasingly yes. The idea here is, can we utilize neuroscience and technology? And if the answer is yes, we can, should we? And if the answer there is we already are and there are some domains and dimensions by which use should be advocated for example, non lethality, least harm, doing less harm than other forms of interventions and engagements that are currently in use, being able to mitigate individuals' capacity or willingness to engage in volatility In other words, improving the capacity for individuals to gain capability to get along? Well, perhaps there's some value there.
Saved - December 27, 2024 at 9:00 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

Yep, the system just hates him ... Elon Musk’s xAI raises $6 billion funding from BlackRock, Nvidia, AMD, and others. Are you getting it yet? I did tell you a long time ago - YOU'VE BEEN HAD. https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/elon-musks-xai-raises-6-billion-funding-from-blackrock-nvidia-amd-and-others-11735045011974.html

Saved - December 27, 2024 at 1:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I addressed the Dutch court about my ongoing ban from nearly 30 Euro countries in the Schengen Group, which is based on a non-existent law. The ban has now been extended for another 2 years, totaling 4 years. I'm frustrated, especially since it's enforced by Geert Wilders' party. Please share.

@davidicke - David Icke

My statement to the Dutch court which again refused to overturn my ban from nearly 30 Euro countries in the Schengen Group - a ban based on a law that DOESN'T EXIST. It has now been renewed for another 2 years (that's 4 so far). If I sound pissed off here - it's because I am. The renewed ban is being imposed by Geert Wilders' 'Party For Freedom'. You've got to laugh, really. PLEASE SHARE.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've traveled to over 60 countries in my life and have never incited violence or terrorism. I abhor violence and have no criminal record. It's absurd to hear a government representative claim I'm a threat to the Netherlands. I am banned from most of Europe for agreeing to speak at a peace rally two years ago. This situation raises questions about whether the judiciary protects citizens from government abuse or serves the government's interests. If it's the latter, the Netherlands is no longer a liberal democracy but a tyranny. I've been accused of threatening democracy, yet the current prime minister is unelected and has never faced a ballot. This entire situation is a farce. I have nothing more to add.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've got years from now, I excel or I know if it's to Sergei if you're over. Am I going for it? Well, I I'm almost speechless, which is very rare for me. I'm a man who has in the last 72 years, most of it in the last 35, traveled to some 60 countries, if not more. I've spoken in most of them, and I've not had any incitement to violence or terrorism in any of them. I if you bother to read my books and hear what I'm actually saying, I have never condoned violence. I abhor violence. Once you are violent, you have lost whatever cause you are so called fighting for. My philosophy on life is, totally against, violence of any kind, and I have no criminal record in any country in the world, even my own where I've spent most of the last 72 years. And yet I have to sit here and listen to a government lawyer and a government, representative saying that I am a threat to the order of the Netherlands. It is a form of insanity. And what we have here is an effort to abuse the law, to stop my right to freedom of movement. I I I I'm almost beyond words to hear a debate this morning about whether I have concrete travel plans to the Netherlands. I am banned from the virtual entirety of Europe. I cannot speak in any of those countries for the crime of agreeing to come to the Netherlands 2 years ago and speak at a peace rally calling for peace. And on the basis of that, I have been unable to enter Europe ever since. And what this comes down to I I I won't abuse my vocal cords responding to this any longer. But what this comes down to is this. Either the judiciary of the Netherlands is there to protect the people from the abuse of power of the government as a check and balance or it is there, and that's been my experience in the last 2 years, it is there to do what the government wants done. And if that's the case, the Netherlands is no longer a liberal democracy. It is a tyranny quite demonstrably. And I would say this to finish. I have been accused in these cases by these government lawyers, Pell Richten, of being a threat to democracy. I I may not have to, remind the court that the Netherlands currently has a prime minister in Dick Schof who is unelected and has never seen a ballot box in his life, a former head of Dutch intelligence. And I I am a threat to democracy. It's a joke. The whole thing is a joke and should be seen as such. I have nothing more to say.
Saved - December 19, 2024 at 10:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I often hear that I should 'meet people where they are' instead of discussing uncomfortable truths. But we’re not in the past; it’s almost 2025, and significant systems of control through AI are on the horizon. We can’t afford to tiptoe around these issues. We face a potential global AI tyranny, and the current administration, despite claiming to defend freedom, is complicit in this. It's crucial to recognize this now, not when it's too late. I’ll continue to speak out, regardless of whether it's popular or not. If that bothers some, so be it.

@davidicke - David Icke

I see people telling me that I have to 'meet people where they are' rather than talk about things they are not ready for. That would be fine and dandy if it was 1850. But it's not. It is almost 2025 as we enter five years in which so many major pillars of mass human control are meant to be in place through AI. We don't have the luxury of tippy-toe steps. We are looking global AI hive-mind tyranny in the eye and we have a Trump/Musk administration that is committed to imposing that tyranny while kidding their support that they are defending 'freedom'. It's a monumental Psyop and we need to see that NOW - not when the cell door slams shut on that very 'freedom'. It may be unpopular to say and not what people want to hear, but it needs saying and I'll go on doing so no matter what. If people don't like that, well, too bad.

Saved - November 26, 2024 at 3:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've noticed a troubling shift in a certain figure who now seems to idolize Musk while still claiming to be 'alternative.' His views on Musk and the so-called 'globalists' reflect a delusion, as he fails to see that Musk is merely a front for larger agendas. He suggests that we need to build civilizations on the Moon and Mars, but that's just a distraction from the truth of our existence. We are not merely human; we are expressions of consciousness trapped in a simulated reality. It's disheartening to see so many in the 'alternative' space blindly following these figures, losing sight of true freedom.

@davidicke - David Icke

I don't know what's happened to this guy but he's become Musk's biggest arse-kisser while continuing to claim he's 'alternative'. Tragic. What he says here about Musk is so self-deluded where do you start? Everything he says about the 'globalists' is where the Musk-Trump Psyop is taking us by a different 'soft sell' route using different rhetoric and excuses. How can he not see that?? It's extraordinary. He believes that Musk is running SpaceX (Pentagon/NASA), brain-chip Neuralink, autonomous vehicle Tesla, and all 'his' other companies while being a front man sales-pitcher for the real controllers and technocratic drivers ticking off their agenda. 'Human' is a brief experience for CONSCIOUSNESS. We are CONSCIOUSNESS, not 'human'. This reality is simulated fakery to seize control of 'human' perception and self-identity - the brain is like a virtual-reality headset decoding simulated information into a 'physical' (holographic) illusion like a computer decodes Wi-Fi as I detail in my book, The Reveal. To say we must build new 'civilizations' on the Moon and Mars is to say we must free ourselves from the perceptual prison cell by travelling to another part of the SAME prison cell. It's all a diversion to make you think this simulated reality is 'real', that the 'Universe' is what they tell us it is, and to hold the line at 'you are human' instead of you are an expression of Infinity - CONSCIOUSNESS entrapped by its attention focused on illusion believing it to be 'real'. Get off your knees to the Musk 'god', Alex, and the Trump 'god'. You have become a parody of 'alternative' by your unquestioning allegiance to these Pied Pipers - and the same with all the others, Rogan, Carlson, Brand, Peterson, Weinstein, Pool, Rudkowski, there are now so many and what has happened to the 'alternative' is indeed tragic and in terms of freedom very dangerous.

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

Breaking Exclusive: Learn Why Elon Musk's Plan to Colonize the Moon and Mars Is Critical to the Future of Humanity's Survival and Consciousness For Latest Reports on X Watch Live: https://t.co/RJSLkFyr5D https://t.co/aBK8R9Kju4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Billionaires, including Bill Gates, have discussed overpopulation and the future of humanity. Elon Musk emphasizes the importance of space exploration, aiming for a Type One civilization that can survive planetary destruction. Critics question the feasibility of sending humans to Mars, citing geopolitical motivations and financial concerns. They argue that exploration should be driven by human spirit rather than profit. The conversation touches on the potential for terraforming Mars and the need for collective goals to inspire innovation. The discussion also highlights a perceived anti-human sentiment among global elites, who advocate for depopulation and control. Ultimately, the vision is to embrace humanity's potential, explore the universe, and foster innovation for a sustainable future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Headline. Billionaires meet in secret to discuss the problem of overpopulation. London Guardian. Everything I'm telling you, you can look up. Bill Gates says he wants to get rid of people, but he wants you to take a shot so you don't die. But now they admit the shot erases your immune system and kills people en masse. So say what you want about Elon Musk. He is a maverick in everything he's done from space exploration to PayPal to getting president Trump elected to taking over x. But it was Twitter for twice what they said it was worth and now making it the number one site in the world. But he says his greatest work the reason he's accumulating all of this wealth is because he doesn't want to go to venture capitalist and have them say they wanna go to Mars because they're gonna make money. It's because it's about exploration. It's about the spiritual message and mission of us being a type one civilization, meaning we would survive if the planet was destroyed. We are not bound to one place. And then they have Neil deGrasse Tyson who constantly says the most unscientific already disproven crap and then says don't don't ever question him. He is the science, and you have this science cult that is anti science telling you 2 men can have a baby, and there are no x and y chromosomes, and that the howling idiot Los Angeles crowd makes fun of Elon Musk. He's stupid. He's not gonna make money going to Mars. Under international law, under historic common law, the first company or government that can go to a new land and stake it out and hold it is the owner. Has Elon Musk said, I'm going to Mars, so I'm the owner of Mars? Has Elon Musk said, I'm gonna go to the asteroid belt? Because I'm gonna own it. No. There is unlimited resources in space, and the development of technology to get there is easier at this point than Magellan circumnavigating the globe. Speaker 1: How soon could Elon Musk realistically send humans to Mars? Another good question. Speaker 2: I have strong views on that. My read of the history of space exploration is such that we do big expensive things only when it's geopolitically expedient, such as we feel threatened by an enemy. And so for him to just say, let's go to Mars because it's the next thing to do, what does that venture capitalist meeting look like? So, Ewan, what do you wanna do? I wanna go to Mars. How much will it cost? A $1,000,000,000,000. Is it safe? No. People will probably die. What's the return on the investment? Nothing. That's a 5 minute meeting, and it doesn't happen. Speaker 3: So so we agree. I'm not going to Mars. Okay. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. There's nothing against Mars. What I'm saying Speaker 4: is here's how we get Speaker 5: to Mars. Right? China leaks Speaker 2: a memo. It doesn't even have to be true. They leak the memo that they wanna put military bases on Mars. Right. Then we're on Mars in 10 months. But NASA doesn't have a spacecraft, but Elon does. Here's my spacecraft to Mars, and we end up paying him to use his spaceship to get to Mars. And that'd be easy for China because Mars is already red. Right? So that'd be an easy sell. Speaker 3: That'd be an easy sell. Okay? That that's how so I I don't see it happening until governments Speaker 2: judge that it's geopolitically in our interest. Otherwise, I don't see it as a as just an exploration now. Speaker 6: But I believe president-elect Trump has some interest in Mars. So we might you might have another conversation in a couple of months. Speaker 2: At some point, somebody has to pay for it, and just being interested in something is not the same thing as paying for it. Speaker 6: He believes there are people there. I mean, he was I I listened to that podcast with Joe Rogan. Two bottles of wine, but Speaker 3: I was Why does why Why why do his comments on what he thinks of live Speaker 2: on Mars matter to you at all? Speaker 7: Because I was president. Speaker 6: I was wondering if you can make it I thought maybe that he might escape there for the holidays. You know you got me stuck on the damn holidays now. Speaker 1: The point is you can't live on Mars. I've said this Speaker 8: so many times. How badly would we do? Speaker 9: How badly would we have to rat fuck Earth Speaker 1: Yeah. Before it was worse than a place that's 200 below 0 Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: With no air Speaker 10: And with no water. Speaker 11: With with 6 months Preach it. Preach it. Speaker 10: YouTube, in addition, Elon wants to terraform Mars. Speaker 2: And if you do that, you could then just walk off a spaceship and breathe the air. But if that's Earth plan b, what did you do to Earth Speaker 12: that now you gotta go to Mars? Speaker 2: If you messed up Earth Well but you're good enough to turn Mars into Earth, then you can turn Earth back into Earth. Yes. Speaker 3: And then you have to go to Earth. Speaker 13: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Visit infowars.comforward/show and share the link today. Speaker 0: I'm about to talk about something that is at the heart of what it is to be human and about what fulfills humanity and and what builds a future that is for humans. The globalist technocrats, the death cult, the antinatalist that are anti family, anti human, anti child on record, like the heads of Google that openly told Elon Musk that decades ago. They're like, you don't like humanity. We're gonna get rid of humanity. You're a you're a you're a prohuman. And he said, you bet I am. And then they took his son away from him and began sterilizing him and killing him. His son is dead. He's still alive, but he's as an individual, as a as as what his destiny was, that's been murdered. Just like Anakin Skywalker ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and died and became Darth Vader. So Musk's brother got really sick from the shot. A lot of his employees got sick from the shot. He had his big wake up. He was already prohuman. Already has a bunch of children. He already looked at the numbers and see that we don't have 2.1 children at least. For every 2 adults, that's not replacement rate and society collapses in all the actuaries and numbers. So the globalist at the WEF, their main high priest, Yuval Noah Harari, Klaus Schwab, King Charles have all said, there are too many people and the future is not human. And by 2047, we'll all be cyborgs. There'll be no more humans. I mean, this is really a hate letter humanity. They want us to turn off our life force, turn off our survival instinct. They want us to hate ourselves with all the fake environmentalism. It isn't about saving the earth. It's about giving them full power and control over carbon to reduce it, whether it's cows or whether it's people. You are the carbon. They wanna reduce. So there has been a movement for decades to get rid of the military having humans make it all machine robot that gives the globalists full control. The machines will follow orders. There's been major moves to not have manned space flight. It's cheaper to send a robot. But we don't do things because it's cheaper. We do things because it builds a human culture. When you follow Bill Gates' directive 15 years ago at a teacher's conference, they all cheered for her, a bunch of them did, that if you don't give an old lady any health care, you can hire 10 teachers with that money, but that's a death panel, he said. And they all laughed. When he says we gotta reduce the carbon down to 0 and talks about getting rid of humans at the TED TV talk, they laugh. Because they're into the cult of selfishness and hate and believing they can do anything they want bad to other humans. Because at the end of the day, we're horrible evil parasites, and we'd be better off with no humans, says the New York Times and the Washington Post and CNN, even Fox News. Too many kids. What's making the planet worse? New York Times headline, looking forward to the end of humans. I've been in grocery store checkout lanes and seen the magazines in the racks many times saying, a future without humans is what we should all want. When the head of the UT biology department in 2007 came out and said, I can't wait till airborne Ebola's released to kill 90% of the world population. He got a standing ovation to Texas Federation of Scientist. It was in the newspaper. His graduate students who've gone on to be bioweapons leaders came out and attacked me and said, Alex Jones is the threat. Bianca's too liberal. We should get rid of all humans. That's in my film endgame, showing what they said in response to him saying kill 90% of us. The Georgia Guidestones saying cut us down to 500,000,000,000. So we need to go to Mars because humans need big, giant collective goals, not individuals being made to do that, but individually believing in great goals, discovery, innovation, and then by free will supporting it and then sharing in it together. We must become a type one civilization for consciousness to ensure the consciousness of humanity continues on. Not just in case we destroy the planet, not because we don't wanna save the planet, but to ensure that we can survive if something does happen to the planet. That's what this is all about. And building a human future, believing in a system that is for humans, by humans is at the very heart of what we are, innovators, trailblazers, mavericks. And so that's where we are, and the globalist don't like humanity. They don't like themselves. They're projecting their own hatred of themselves onto us. And the entire environmental movement is meant to make you guilty and hate yourself and believe the world's ending, and things are gonna collapse, and it's all your fault that's gonna happen. So as the globalist carry out the great reset collapsing civilization, they could turn around and say it's your fault. The 3rd world's collapsing and starving. Not because of 3 years of lockdowns that admittedly caused it, but no, because of global warming. Speaker 3: I mean, Speaker 0: there's actual New York Times headlines that say, looking forward to the end of humans. So you've seen them. I've seen them. Bill Joy, 1999, Wire Magazine, Why the Future Doesn't Need Us. He goes to a big globalist tech conference with 200 tech billionaire leaders. They have meetings and have a consensus. It's time to get rid of humanity. Go read it. It's free online. Why the future doesn't need us? There it is. Looking forward to the end of humanity. Oh, Wall Street Journal. And it came out in the New York Times that Bill Gates met in secret with world leaders, including Oprah Winfrey in 2004 to decide on a plan to depopulate the Earth using a global government and the threat of viruses. Headline, billionaires meet in secret to discuss the problem of overpopulation. Blood and Guardian. Everything I'm telling you, you can look up. Bill Gates says he wants to get rid of people, but he wants you to take a shot so you don't die. But now they admit the shot erases your immune system and kills people en masse. So say what you want about Elon Musk. He is a maverick in everything he's done from space exploration to PayPal to getting president Trump elected to taking over x. But it was Twitter for twice what they said it was worth and now making it the number one site in the world. But he says his greatest work the reason he's accumulating all of this wealth is because he doesn't want to go to venture capitalist and have them say they wanna go to Mars because they're gonna make money. It's because it's about exploration. It's about the spiritual message and mission of us being a type one civilization, meaning we would survive if the planet was destroyed. We are not bound to one place. And then they have Neil deGrasse Tyson who constantly says the most unscientific, already disproven crap, and then says, don't don't ever question him. He is the science. And you have this science cult that is anti science telling you 2 men can have a baby, and there are no x and y chromosomes, and that the howling idiot Los Angeles crowd makes fun of Elon Musk. He's stupid. He's not gonna make money going to Mars. Under international law, under historic common law, the first company or government that can go to a new land and stake it out and hold it is the owner. As Elon Musk said, I'm going to Mars, so I'm the owner of Mars. As Elon Musk said, I'm gonna go to the asteroid belt because I'm gonna own it. No. There is unlimited resources in space, and the development of technology to get there is easier at this point than Magellan circumnavigating the globe. So we're already there. We just have to wanna do it. And Musk has taken the space program in just the last 10 years and accelerated it at least tenfold what all previous space program did in the 80 years before that. So, again, the science, the innovation that will come out of this, and the daring. We need to send humans to Mars because it is dangerous. We need to send systems to space that can sustain humans so that we learn so that we say, no. We're going to build a universe and technology and systems that empower humans. Humans are the only creature on the earth that controls and builds its own environment. The innovations of air conditioning and and and medicine and and and science and telecommunications and and electricity and all of it is tanker toys compared to what we have in our hands now. Do we have an economy based on innovation of the ocean and exploration and innovation and exploration of space? That is the anti death cult. That is the pro team humanity where you're not wearing a jersey for your football team or basketball team because you don't care about that because it doesn't matter. It's just a diversion. Read the circuses. You wear the jersey for team humanity. You wear the jersey for SpaceX or the competing interest. And I guarantee you, Elon Musk will welcome that. But no one else could do it because they don't have the vision and the will and the focus. I mean, Elon Musk says 3 years ago, I want the starship, the biggest by far heavy lifter in history, to land and have giant metal robot arms grab it, and he does it, and it works. That that is the innovative spirit and the innovative spark that you have to have to build the Panama Canal. French couldn't do it. We did it. And all of these other incredible things, instead of making hydrogen bombs, let's create which they already have free energy. Let's do it all. Let's not keep this from humanity. Let's not decide humanity's garbage and that we're gonna just get rid of it and have some new super silicon creature that rises from it. So let's go to this Neil deGrasse Tyson clip on Bill Maher and just listen to these idiots. Sit there and pooh pooh this. And Elon Musk said, wow. They really don't get it. Mars is critical to the long term survival of consciousness. Also, I'm not going to ask any venture capitalists for money. I realize that it makes no sense as an investment. That's why I'm gathering resources. Meanwhile, the globalist don't wanna go to space. They wanna control the animals and the people and take over the genetics. It's not a vaccine to inject cows that take over their immune systems and don't let them have bacteria in their guts that actually produce nutrients. That's what does it. No. We're gonna just change them and mutate them and see what happens, and that That's the final frontier of them playing god. Them cutting off your resources and saying you will eat the bugs so they can make you the elaborate in their experiment unwittingly. Instead, Musk says, let's all be part of the experiment of expansion of consciousness and true fair human innovation and the new ultra renaissance. So this is what we're meant to do, and we must embrace our humanity. We we we must embrace exploration. We must embrace trailblazing. We must embrace the maverick spirit, and that's the final bubble. The singularity is accelerated expansion, not some singularity where it all ends. No. It all expands. There's that door song written by Jim Morrison. The future is uncertain and the end is always near. Roadhouse Blues, and I posted on next last week. I read exactly what I said. It was, the future is certain, and expansion is always here. Expansion will always be happening. The question is, do you wanna be part of it? So there's not just evil in the universe. There's good. But when good comes along, we have to realize it, and we have to embrace it. And it doesn't mean it's some perfect good, but what Donald Trump and Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson and Elon Musk and you symbolize is prohuman. You can see it. You can feel it. You can taste it. You see the fruits of it as Christ said. Now is our role model you've all know Harari and King Charles and Klaus Schwab, or is it Donald Trump and Elon Musk? And in the media and in the info war, is your role model Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson, or is it Rachel Maddow? Well, it turns out people want freedom. They want innovation. They want straight shooting. I demand straight shooting. I love it's my religion is the truth. I wanna get it just right. I wanna put out accurate information. I wanna receive good information because that's how you build. That's how you're empowered. So here's Neil deGrasse Tyson, and then I'm gonna respond to it. Here it is. Speaker 6: I'm just saying. Speaker 1: How soon could Elon Musk realistically send humans to Mars? Another good question. Speaker 2: I have strong views on that. My read of the history of space exploration is such that we do big expensive things only when it's geopolitically expedient, such as we feel threatened by an enemy. And so for him to just say, let's go to Mars because it's the next thing to do, what does that venture capitalist meeting look like? So, Ewan, what do you wanna do? I wanna go to Mars. How much will it cost? A $1,000,000,000,000. Is it safe? No. People will probably die. What's the return on the investment? Nothing. That's a 5 minute meeting, and it doesn't happen. So Speaker 3: so they agree. We have to go to Mars. Okay. Wait a minute. What we're doing nothing against Mars. Speaker 4: What I'm saying is here's how we get Speaker 5: to Mars. Right? China Speaker 2: leaks a memo. It doesn't even have to be true. They leak a memo that they wanna put military bases on Mars. Right. Then we're on Mars in 10 months, but NASA doesn't have a spacecraft, but Elon does. Here's my spacecraft to Mars, and we end up paying him to use his spaceship to get to Mars. And that'd be easy for China because Mars is already red. Right? So that'd be Speaker 3: easy sell. That'd be easy sell. Okay? That that's how so I don't I don't see it happening until Speaker 2: governments judge that it's geopolitically in our interest. Otherwise, I don't see it as a as just an exploration now. Speaker 6: But I believe president-elect Trump has some interest in Mars. So we might you might have another conversation in a couple of months. Speaker 2: At some point, somebody has to pay for it, and just being interested in something is not the same thing as paying for it. Speaker 6: He believes there are people there. I mean, he was I I listened to that podcast with Joe Rogan. 2 for hours 2 bottles of wine, but I was Speaker 3: Why why why do his comments on what he thinks of Live Speaker 2: on Mars matter to you at all? Speaker 7: Because I was president. Speaker 6: I was wondering. See if Speaker 3: we can make it happen. Speaker 6: I thought maybe that he might escape there for the holidays. You know you got me stuck on the damn holidays now. Speaker 1: The the point is you can't live on Mars. I've said this Speaker 8: so many times. How badly Speaker 9: would we how badly would we have to rat fuck Earth Speaker 1: Yeah. Before it was worse than a place that's 200 below 0 Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: With no air, Speaker 10: with no water, Speaker 11: with with 6 months Preach it. Speaker 3: Preach it. You Speaker 10: too. In addition, Elon wants to terraform Mars. And if Speaker 2: you do that, you could then just walk off a spaceship and breathe the air. But if that's Earth plan b, what Speaker 0: did you do to Earth Speaker 12: that now you gotta go to Mars? Speaker 2: If you messed up Earth Well but you're good enough to turn Mars into Earth, then you can turn Earth back into Earth. Speaker 3: Yes. And then have to go to Earth as a clone. Speaker 0: These are the type of people that would say, don't go to the new world, or don't get wagon trains and go west, or why are the Wright brothers building a airplane out of balsa wood and paper with bicycle wheels? And, again, that way, it's finite money. There's unlimited money if you have resources and ideas. Money is just a symbol of exchange. And so they're howling and laughing in Elon when those people aren't real scientists. They don't really know anything. They don't really innovate anything. They don't do anything. They just sit around laughing with all this technology around them that other people developed giggling about it. And then look, oh, they want trillions for illegal aliens and trillions to owe plenty of money to cut little boys' penises off. But, man, if you wanna go to space, if you wanna go to Mars by the way, Mars has a southern and northern ice cap. Mars has all sorts of resources we don't have. Same thing with the asteroid belt. And if you went back 200 years ago and showed somebody a 777 Boeing, and they told you you could get on that and, you know, fly out from LA in 5 hours, 6 hours being Hawaii, they wouldn't even know what Hawaii was. There are people thinking incredibly small, ladies and gentlemen. You get off the planet. You have unlimited resources. Of course, you have robots do most of it at first, but you get the toehold. You excite everybody about it, and then you send out the robots and you do it all. And then you set up these outpost and giant space stations with gravity because they're spinning, and it's kick ass. And, obviously, that's what you do. I don't have to tell you all the innovation we've gotten out of the space program, but the people in control now wanna post industrial world. They wanna take all the industry and fueling with the old technology from us and then depopulate us to slowly poison us to death, and Elon Musk is fighting that. But we need symbols. So, first, go to the moon. It's better to do a Mars shot from there anyways, and there's a lot of stuff going on there. I'll just leave it at that. Right at the edge of the dark side or can't be surveilled. And, Yeah. Musk is in charge of the secret space program. He's not putting ticker toys up in space. They're gonna have to launch over 400 space launches in the next couple years with the Starship and the Falcon Heavy. And under Trump and Musk, they're gonna start showing you the space planes and showing you all the real stuff and just go, yeah. Here it is. And then all the other countries will roll over China and Russia. The technology is so advanced. We're already in the year 2050, folks. The future's here. It's just not equally distributed. We are team humanity. We are human supremacists. I am a human supremacist. I am a human supremacist. That term will be the future war with the robots and the AI. What you're hearing now is the entire future and everything they tried to stop us from doing. Our supremacy will not end with this planet. We will people the stars. We will colonize. We will green dead worlds. We will go interdimensional. We will unlock the secrets of the universe. God has laid them out like Christmas presents for his children. And I am extremely honored to be in the fulcrum and the heart of the fight to bring our race, the human race, in a race for the future. I am honored to be here. Speaker 7: You are listening to an infowars.com frontlinereport. If you are receiving this transmission, you are the resistance. Speaker 0: Irish sea moss has been all the rage in the last 5 years because when folks started discovering it, it took the country in the world by storm because of the incredible effects it has. It's probably the greatest superfood out there, full of organic based iodine and a whole bunch of vitamins and minerals. And we've got the gummies and the capsules now in stock at thealexchoehnstore.com that are some of the strongest and best out there. Up to 55% off when you get 3 bottles, over 40% off when you get 2 bottles, 40% off when you get one bottle, and it's in stock right now. Ultimateseamoss at our great sponsor, thealexjonesstore.com. And while you're there, check out the hundreds of designs of Patriot T shirts, ball caps, and hoodies. And regardless what happens to Infowars here in the next 28 days, ladies and gentlemen, your support of our sponsor will make sure I am able to stay on air. So please take action now at the Alex Jones store dot com. Get the ultimate sea moss gummies and capsules as well as other amazing supplements and Patriot apparel. God bless you. Now thanks Speaker 3: for Speaker 0: the support.
Saved - November 26, 2024 at 3:06 AM

@davidicke - David Icke

But Kim - your hero Musk has hired (been told to hire) an Israeli intelligence company to 'process' data of X users and insists that people can't be paid unless they comply. Talk about naivety, mate.

@SprinterFamily - S p r i n t e r

Famous entrepreneur Kim Dotcom about the new member of the Board of Directors of OpenAI (ChatGPT) Paul M. Nakasone. https://t.co/8MdrKKhox0

Saved - November 16, 2024 at 7:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it absurd to claim that Covid originated in a lab or that it started anywhere specific. The idea that the Trump team views Covid as a scam is misguided, especially considering Trump's association with the vaccine narrative and the censorship during his presidency. The manipulation of facts and historical events is striking. I'm curious to see how Kennedy plans to reveal the truth about the so-called fake Covid vaccine agenda while addressing Trump's significant involvement in it. This should be intriguing to follow.

@davidicke - David Icke

Absolute crap. 'Covid' did not start in a lab. It didn't start anywhere. 'The entire Trump team know Covid was a scam'? Clearly they don't know what kind of scam and they now serve the self-styled 'Father of the vaccine' who responded according to Cult script and was president when the mass censorship was happening. The gaslighting and rewriting of history is extraordinary. How is Kennedy going to expose the fake 'Covid vaccine' agenda without exposing Trump's central role? It will be interesting to watch.

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

Covid Justice is Coming ‼️ “This Virus began in a Lab” This as Elon Musk restated his ‘prosecute/Fauci pro-nouns & has announced twice that “the hammer of justice is coming” The entire Trump Team know Covid was a Scam & they know people wont rest until everyone connected is behind bars. It will happen people.

Video Transcript AI Summary
COVID-19 originated in a lab, and it took too long to acknowledge this due to the suppression of debate through accusations of racism. Big tech censored discussions about the virus's origins in the name of preventing misinformation, which ironically led to more confusion. We must learn from this history to avoid repeating mistakes. As president, I commit to holding accountable those responsible for the pandemic's origin, including using financial measures against the CCP and investigating U.S. officials who may have contributed to the crisis through gain-of-function research. It's time to move beyond complaints and focus on solutions. You have my commitment to do just that.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So now we know what we should have known all along, which was that this virus, COVID, began in a lab. It is a shame that it took us to get as long as it did to get to this answer clearly. You wanna know why? They used the threat of racism to suppress any iota of debate. 2 years ago, people ought to remember this right now. If we don't learn from our history, we will never get better. Big tech companies censored, mark my words, censored someone from being able to say online that this virus originated in a lab. Okay. This was in the name of preventing the spread of misinformation. What did we do? We actually created the spread of more misinformation. We have to learn from our history or else we're gonna keep making the same mistakes. Free speech is a precondition for truth, and we got this one wrong. But it's not just enough to look backwards. Going forward as US president, I'm committing to deliver accountability for the origin of the COVID 19 pandemic. Anything else is not an option or we can expect even worse from the CCP in the future. And I'll you mark my words. I think we need to use every financial lever in our arsenal to do it. As your president, I commit to doing that including, but not limited to even looking at the national debt of the US that they hold as an option. Sanctions on CCP officials and even criminal investigations into US government officials who knowingly evaded a federal ban on gain of function research to fund it abroad instead in the name of preventing a global pandemic may have very well contributed to creating 1 and then used private companies through the back door to censor scrutiny and dissent. This is what makes our founding fathers roll over in their graves, but it's not just time to complain about it. It is finally time to deliver solutions, and you have my commitment that I will.
Saved - November 14, 2024 at 1:35 PM

@davidicke - David Icke

Who would want to be the 'George Soros' of anything at all? And the 'Soros of the Left' answers to the same masters as the 'Soros of the Right'. Thus Israel-firsters dominated the 'Biden' and Obama administrations as they did and do Trump's.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

Speaker at Mar-a-Lago: “Where is the George Soros of the Right?” Elon Musk: *Raises hand* https://t.co/Eb1NnboYbg

Video Transcript AI Summary
We will always uphold the great promise of America. Thank you for your support, Kim, and for your contributions, Elon Musk. God bless you both.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is the charge I got you. Of the right. I got you. Where do we find the right? Yeah. We will never give up on the great promise of America in Kim Walks, Elon Musk. So god bless you in that, and we're so, so grateful.
Saved - November 12, 2024 at 4:27 AM

@davidicke - David Icke

Trump selects Elise Stefanik for his UN Ambassador. This is why he picked her ... https://t.co/E8y42RBsu3

Video Transcript AI Summary
I will defend George Washington's vision of religious pluralism and freedom by combating antisemitism and supporting Israel unconditionally. The threats we face, like those from Hamas, remind us of the dangers we could encounter at home. It is our duty to support Israel's efforts against these threats. There is no justification for blocking aid to Israel or easing sanctions on Iran, especially when Congress has approved such aid. I have consistently backed measures to support Israel and have partnered with President Trump in promoting Israeli independence and security, including the relocation of the US embassy to Jerusalem. Israel represents freedom, Western values, and human potential, embodying the American dream we cherish.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As long as I serve the American people, I will defend George Washington's vision of religious pluralism and freedom. Today, this means crushing antisemitism at home and supplying the state of Israel with what it needs, when it needs it without conditions to achieve total victory in the face of evil. Chants of death to America are not hollow slogans. They are a promise that what happened here on October 7th could happen in the United States unless Hamas and its jihadist accomplices are eliminated. And it is the United States' high honor and high responsibility to support Israel's effort. I have been clear at home, and I will be clear here. There is no excuse for an American president to block aid to Israel, aid that was duly passed by the Congress. There was no excuse to ease sanctions on Iran, paying a $6,000,000,000 ransom to the world's leading state sponsor of terror or to dither and hide while our friends fight for their lives. No excuse. Full stop. That's why I'm proud to have sponsored or backed every measure to aid Israel that has come before the United States Congress. Every single one. And it's why for years, I have been a leading proponent and partner to president Trump in his historic support for Israeli independence and security, including moving the US embassy to its rightful place in Jerusalem. Israel is indeed a miracle, an outpost of freedom, of Western values, of civilization, a striking example of human potential, the physical embodiment of Herzl's maxim, if you will it, it is no dream. It's the same founding ethos that we prize in America, the American dream.
View Full Interactive Feed