TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @davincentjames

Saved - October 17, 2025 at 1:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can’t browse the web in real time, but these topics span espionage, terrorism, and conspiracy claims involving Israel, the US, and various groups. They include Lavon Affair, King David Hotel bombing, USS Liberty, Jonathan Pollard, Dancing Israelis, 9/11/Neo‑Con theories, Project for the New American Century, Mossad/JFK claims, ADL controversies, and related “controlled history” narratives. Reliability varies; many claims are disputed.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Google the following: ‘The Lavon affair’ ‘Bombing of King David Hotel’ ‘Irgun terrorism’ ‘The Dotan affair’ ‘Steve Rosen Cocktail Napkin’ ‘Fake control room Dimona’ ‘The USS Liberty - sir American Ship’ ‘The Apollo affair’ ‘Mossad JFK Sandler’ ‘Kosher Nostra’ ‘Epstein Mossad’ ‘ADL Rosen Franklin Scandal’ ‘Jonathan Pollard’ ‘Dancing Israelis Urban Moving’ ‘Israeli art students 911’ ‘Project New American Century’ ‘New Pearl Harbor’ ‘Douglas Feith Doctored Intel’ ‘Weather Underground last names’ ‘The Frankfurt School’ ‘Magnus Hirschfeld’ ‘Bolsheviks ethnicity’ ‘Rosa Luxembourg’ ‘Trotsky real last name’ ‘Bernadine Dohrn real last name’ ‘Weather underground white children’ ‘Rothschilds Balfour Declaration’ ‘Ben Freedman 1961 speech’ ‘Israel Pegasus’ ‘Spy devices DC Israel’ ‘Leo Frank ADL Guilty’ ‘The Romance of a People video’ ‘New Pearl Harbor’ ‘Daily Veracity books burned’ ‘Marching to Zion documentary’

@infolibnews - Chris Menahan 🇺🇸

Netanyahu: Everyone hates us for no reason. https://t.co/MZq8eAnHs4

Video Transcript AI Summary
It’s described as a cyclical phenomenon of historical waves that come and go. The speaker’s father was a great historian who studied thousands of years of history and asserted that this would come again. The current discourse, however, only looks back to breakfast, and the speaker urges looking back further. He identifies October 7 as the date of “breakfast,” two years ago, noting what happened that day: massive crowds in the capitals of the West, including in the United States, in the cities of The United States, supporting Hamas and shouting for Hamas. The crowds are described as supporting “these rapists, these murderers, these beheaders of men and burners of babies.” The speaker emphasizes that this occurred before Israel acted, asserting that Israel could not even reach the point where it could defend itself for some time. He argues that the event is not related to that specific moment alone but to an underlying hatred of Jews that has permeated centuries. He states there are two things to mention: first, it has been a constant phenomenon of Jewish life over the millennia to have horrifying lies perpetrated about Jews, including vilifications. He cites the charge that “we poison the wells, we drink the children, the blood of children,” along with other sensational accusations, asserting that this pattern is repeated today and is not new. He claims that every time such vilifications have occurred in history, they were preceded and followed by massacres and pogroms, culminating in the Holocaust. Finally, the speaker references the worst pogrom of them all, the Holocaust, in which “6,000,000 Jews were basically burnt alive.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a cyclical phenomenon of historical waves that come and go. And my father was a great student of history, great historian, actually told me that this is something that's gonna come because he studied it for, you know, he studied a few thousand years of this. So it keeps coming and going. Of course, people's sense of history in this current discourse goes back to breakfast, so they don't know. They should even look back at breakfast. You know when breakfast was? October 7, right? That's two years ago, before we had this war. Okay. What happened on that day? You had massive crowds in the capitals of the West, including in The United States, in the cities of The United States, supporting Hamas, supporting these rapists, these murderers, these beheaders of men and burners of babies. And they were shouting for Hamas. Remember that? That was before Israel did anything. We couldn't even get to the point where we defended ourselves. It took us a while. So it's not related to that, it's related to an underlying hatred of Jews that permeates the centuries unfortunately. And there are only two things that I'd say about it. It's been a constant phenomenon of Jewish life over the millennia to have these horrible, horrible lies perpetrated about Jews, these vilifications, you know. We poison the wells, we drink the children, the blood of children, and all sorts of crazy things. And that's repeated today. That's not new. And every time we had it in history, these vilifications were just preceded and were followed by horrible massacres and pogroms culminating in the worst pogrom of them all, the Holocaust, in which 6,000,000 Jews were basically burnt alive.
Saved - October 15, 2025 at 3:12 AM

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Tucker is starting to fly a little too close to the sun… https://t.co/OlG6AGaX97

Video Transcript AI Summary
Checklist for the summary approach: - Identify the core claim and the proposed link between the Demona project and JFK’s assassination. - Note the main actors and roles: Angleton, the Oswald file, the Kennedy White House, and the Israeli government. - Capture the central conflict: Kennedy’s push for on-site inspections versus Israeli resistance, and why inspections would reveal a bomb-making program. - Emphasize the claim that the juxtaposition of these facts should be part of the public record. - Preserve key terms and phrases from the transcript without adding new analysis or qualifiers. Summary: The speaker begins by asking why the Demona project, described as the Israeli nuclear program, which “has never officially been admitted by anybody but Israel,” could plausibly relate to the assassination of JFK. The reply asserts that the connection lies in what James Angleton was doing in 1963. It is stated that there were profound conflicts between Israel and the Kennedy White House over Israel’s nuclear program. Specifically, Kennedy pressed for on-site inspections, while the Israelis resisted these inspections because they would have revealed that Israel possessed a bomb-making program. The dialogue characterizes this disagreement as a real bone of contention between the Israeli government and the Kennedy administration in 1963, a period when Angleton controlled the Oswald file. The conclusion drawn is that the juxtaposition of these facts means that everything about the issue should be on the public record.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why in the world would the Demona project, the Israeli nuclear program, which has never officially been admitted by anybody but Israel, what would that conceivably have to do with the assassination of JFK? Speaker 1: It relates to what Angleton was doing in 1963. Okay? There were profound conflicts between Israel and the Kennedy White House over the the nuclear program. Kennedy was pressing for on-site inspections, which the Israelis resisted because on-site inspections would have realized that they had a bomb making program. So this was a real bone of contention between the Israeli government and the Kennedy administration in the 1963 at a time when Engelton controlled the Oswald file. So just the juxtaposition of those facts means that everything about it should be on the public record.

@CozyGoyda - 𝘎𝘰𝘺𝘥𝘢

Kennedy dies, Israel gets the bomb - Vince https://t.co/jXt2OOsp7Q

Video Transcript AI Summary
Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and sequence the core claims and key actors presented. - Preserve the main connections and alleged motives without adding new interpretation. - Retain direct claims and quotes as stated, avoiding evaluative language. - Exclude repetitive content, filler, and off-topic details. - Translate non-English elements if present; here, content is in English. - Keep the summary within 373–467 words while capturing unique or surprising points. The speaker argues that Kennedy assassination discussions must include Israel and the Messiah, labeling them the main group involved. They state the prime minister of Israel at the time declared that without nuclear weapons, Israel would not survive. Kennedy was said to be asking for neutral scientists to observe the reactor, and the effort was pushed by CIA director McCone until access was granted. Israel, prior to the visit, allegedly set up a fake control room with fake control panels, and part of the agreement was that inspectors would never be able to inspect the actual reactor. After the visit, Kennedy is quoted as saying, "those sons of lie to me constantly about their nuclear capability." The speaker claims the Jewish community invited JFK to come to Dallas, sponsored by the Dallas Citizens Council, directed by Julia Sheps, who was a member of the local Benai Barif organization, with ADL Benai Barif noted as a confirmed member as well. Abraham Zapruder is identified as the man who captured the assassination on film. Zapruder is described as a manufacturer headquartered in the Dallas Textiles Building, and the statement is made that ballistic studies traced the shots to that building. The building is said to have been owned by David Weisblatt, described as one of the biggest financiers of the Anti-Defamation League, and Douglas Jaffe, described as one of the biggest donors to Lyndon B. Johnson. The host committee that invited Kennedy to Dallas is said to have been chaired by Sam Bloom, and Dallas police allegedly report that Bloom pushed hardest for transferring Lee Harvey Oswald from the Dallas police station to the Dallas County jail. It is stated that Jack Ruby shot Oswald during that transfer, and a question is asked: "What was Jack Ruby's real last name? Jakob Rubinstein." The reactor is claimed to have gone critical right after Kennedy died, and the speaker asserts that a bomb came a year or two later. The closing line notes, "That's kind of a coincidence, isn't it? That's kind of a strange coincidence. Kennedy dies? Israel gets the bomb."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can't talk about the Kennedy assassination without talking about Israel, without talking about the Messiah. They're the main people involved. That's the main group involved. The prime minister of Israel at the time said that without nuclear weapons, Israel would not survive. Kennedy was asking and asking and asking for neutral scientists to observe the reactor. They continue to push for this with CIA director McConne and finally was granted access. Israel prior to the visit set up a fake control room with fake control panels, and part of the agreement was that the inspectors were never going to be able to inspect the actual reactor. After that visit, Kennedy was quoted in saying, those sons of lie to me constantly about their nuclear capability. The Jewish community invites JFK to come to Dallas, which was sponsored by the Dallas Citizens Council, which was directed by Julia Sheps, who was a member of the local Benai Barif organization, the ADL Benai Barif once again, a confirmed member of the local Benai Barif as well. Abraham Zapruder was also just so happened to be the guy that caught the assassination on film. Zapruder was also a manufacturer headquartered in the Dallas Textiles Building. According to ballistic studies, it was from that building. The first two shots were fired and missed. The building was owned by David Weisblatt, one of the biggest financiers of the Anti Defamation League, and Douglas Jaffe, one of the biggest donors to Lyndon B. Johnson. The host committee that invited Kennedy to the event in Dallas was chaired by a guy named Sam Bloom. According to Dallas police, it was Bloom who pushed the hardest for the police to transfer Lee Harvey Oswald from the Dallas police station to the Dallas County jail. Now it was during that transfer that Jack Ruby shot Oswald. What was Jack Ruby's real last name? Jakob Rubinstein. The reactor went critical right after Kennedy died, and they got the bomb a year or two later. That's kind of a coincidence, isn't it? That's kind of a strange coincidence. Kennedy dies? Israel gets the bomb. Gets the bomb.
Saved - October 6, 2025 at 9:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been exploring the control that Israel, specifically through Oracle and Larry Ellison, has over TikTok's algorithm. Ellison's connections to Israeli politics are notable, including past lobbying efforts related to Netanyahu. I also looked into Palantir, led by Alex Karp, which has deep ties to the CIA and a focus on decisions influenced by Karp's Jewish identity. The influence of wealthy donors like Ellison on U.S. policy towards Israel is significant, and I found references to their political activities and connections to media figures like Bari Weiss.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Israel has taken complete control of TikTok’s algorithm. And when I say Israel, I mean quite literally… Oracle, headed up by Larry Ellison, now controls what you see on the app. Ellison once offered Netanyahu a seat on the board of Oracle. (Thread) 🧵 https://t.co/emhLnLDode

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Oracle is similar to Palantir in that they are both headed up by Zionist Jews (Larry Ellison and Alex Karp) and their very first customer was the CIA. Oracle shares its name with a 1977 CIA operation. https://t.co/nDoyi5JqGp

@davincentjames - Vincent James

According to the New York Times, Karp says a lot of the decisions he makes at Palantir are driven “by his experiences as a Jew.” Birthed by funding from In-Q-Tel, Palantir’s only client up until 2008 was the CIA. Here’s Karp, saying that software Palantir created "single-handedly stopped the far right in Europe.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
We built PG, which single handedly stopped, the rise of the far right in in in Europe. We built Foundry, which, was just was used to distribute the COVID vaccine and saved millions of lives globally. We built what we call multi multi constellation and what's often called the digital kill chain, and they're category defining products. So when you deliver these products to the market, just honestly, people say this isn't gonna exist. This isn't valuable, but then it changes the market. And then the market is the Palantir market. Now that doesn't mean everyone in the world's gonna buy our product, but it means most of the sensible people in the world are gonna define buy from the category we defined.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. We we built PG, which single handedly stopped, the rise of the far right in in in in Europe. We built Foundry, which, was just was used to distribute the COVID vaccine and saved millions of lives globally. We built what we call multi multi constellation and what's often called the digital kill chain, and they're category defining products. So when you deliver these products to the market, just honestly, people say this isn't gonna exist. This isn't valuable, but then it changes the market. And then the market is the Palantir market. Now that doesn't mean everyone in the world's gonna buy our product, but it means most of the sensible people in the world are gonna define buy from the category we defined.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Oh by the way, according to that same NYT article, Karp also studied under the OG Frankfurt School. https://t.co/SUPru2t0Z7

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Back to Oracle… Oracle’s Larry Ellison once lobbied Mossad Agent / Hollywood Producer Arnon Milchan to give up the services of his attorney in a criminal case against Netanyahu so he could represent him in the case. https://t.co/6HUWWSkmtd

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Here’s a movie Arnon Milchan helped produce… https://t.co/w5hee69vB9

@davincentjames - Vincent James

And he also helped produce this movie which convinced America it was the CIA, not Israel, that killed JFK. https://t.co/l64wMGKg37

@davincentjames - Vincent James

The Guardian characterized Ellison as having “deep political ties … to the Israeli prime minister … including multi-million dollar donations to the Israeli military. JTA reports that in 2025, Ellison briefly overtook others as the world’s richest man, and noted that he has “long consistently edged out … as the wealthiest Jew in the world”

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Ellison is among “Israel’s biggest U.S. donors” or “avowed Zionists” who use their influence to push Israeli policy. His son now owns CBS, and Bari Weiss (accused Mossad agent) was a recent big hire. https://t.co/L2LVZgbp3U

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Bari Weiss once called Tulsi Gabbard an “Assad sycophant” because she opposed regime change in Syria, which was one of the countries Israel needed taken out so they can continue expansion. Israel finally achieved this recently. https://t.co/PUIQzgV0YW

Video Transcript AI Summary
"No. She's an Assad toady." "What does that mean?" "She is a toady? I think that I used that word correctly." "A sycophant." "So she's an Assad sycophant. Is that what you're saying?" "Yeah. That's prove that's known about her." "What did she say that qualifies for? I don't I don't remember the details. I've read it." "I've had her on before. Look up I really enjoyed talking to her." "I like talking to her." "I like talking to her. I don't know about think she's like the mother load of bad ideas." "I didn't know about this." "But doesn't she also did she ever apologize for believing in conversion therapy? For" "I didn't even know she believed in conversion therapy." "Am I crazy?"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kristen Gillibrand. Oh, monstrous. Monstrous? Speaker 1: Ideas. Well, when she was 22, she had Speaker 0: No. She's an Assad toady. Speaker 1: What does that mean? Speaker 0: She is a toady? I think that I used that word correctly. Jamie, can you check what toady means? Speaker 1: Like toe in the line? Is that what it means? Speaker 0: No. I think it's like a How do you spell it? T o a d I e. What Speaker 1: does that mean? Speaker 0: I think it means what I think it means. Hey. Yeah. Here you go. Speaker 1: Todi. Definition of toadies. A person who A sycophant. Flatters or defers to others Speaker 0: Can I kinda use Speaker 1: it? Serving reasons. Speaker 0: A sycophant. Speaker 1: So she's an Assad sycophant. Is that what you're saying? Speaker 0: Yeah. That's prove that's known about her. Speaker 1: Like, what did she say Speaker 0: that qualifies for? I don't I don't remember the details. I've read it. Speaker 1: Probably should say that before we say that about her. We should probably read it rather. Speaker 0: Well, I have read it. Speaker 1: No. Mean, we should write Speaker 0: it now. Oh, yeah. Okay. Speaker 1: Just so we know what Speaker 0: she said. I've I've had her on before. Look up I really Speaker 1: enjoyed talking to her. I like her a lot. Speaker 0: Are you serious? Speaker 1: Yeah. I like talking to her. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: I like talking to her. I don't know about Speaker 0: think she's like the mother load of bad ideas. Woah. I'm pretty positive about that, especially on Assad, but maybe I'm wrong. I don't think I'm wrong. Speaker 1: Well, my take on her was that I think as a person who's coming from the left, who's also a veteran and is very articulate and sensible and a woman, and in talking to her, we didn't get into Assad or any of those things, but talking to her about what she feels is wrong with the current administration and the way things are running and a direction she thinks things could go in, she had some very promising ideas. I don't I didn't know about Speaker 0: this. But doesn't she also did she ever apologize for believing in conversion therapy? For Speaker 1: I didn't even know she believed in conversion therapy. Speaker 0: Am I crazy?

@davincentjames - Vincent James

@BasedSamParker Ok haven’t had time to look at this all yet but thanks for this thread. This is a great place for me to start.

Saved - October 2, 2025 at 10:12 PM

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Here’s an ADL employee talking about how they installed their AI “online hate index” across social media platforms, and how their organization has become “trusted flaggers” for YouTube. https://t.co/MpdRChVug6

Video Transcript AI Summary
- "ADL and the University of California at Berkeley's D Lab have been working to develop a new approach to tackle online hate using the latest methods." - "The goal of the online hate index is to help tech platforms better understand the growing amount of hate on social media and to use that information to address the problem." - "By combining artificial intelligence and machine learning with social science, the online hate index will ultimately uncover and identify trends and patterns in hate speech across different platforms." - "We've just completed our first phase of research and we found that the machine learning model identified hate speech accurately between seventy eight and eighty five percent of the time." - "We'll examine content on multiple social media sites and we'll identify strategies to deploy the model more broadly."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: ADL and the University of California at Berkeley's D Lab have been working to develop a new approach to tackle online hate using the latest methods. The goal of the online hate index is to help tech platforms better understand the growing amount of hate on social media and to use that information to address the problem. By combining artificial intelligence and machine learning with social science, the online hate index will ultimately uncover and identify trends and patterns in hate speech across different platforms. We've just completed our first phase of research and we found that the machine learning model identified hate speech accurately between seventy eight and eighty five percent of the time. In the next phase of our project, we will look at specific targeted populations in a more detailed manner. We'll examine content on multiple social media sites and we'll identify strategies to deploy the model more broadly. While there's still a long way to go with artificial intelligence and machine learning based solutions, we believe the online hate index will help tech companies better understand the extent of hateful content on their platforms by creating community based definitions of hate speech.

@ggreenwald - Glenn Greenwald

The ADL has bullied and coerced huge numbers of institutions to take orders from it about whose views should be deemed "extremist" and thus prohibited, and whose shouldn't. As but one example, Paypal uses the ADL to decide who should be expelled from using its services: https://t.co/M1En4hIaOI

@FBIDirectorKash - FBI Director Kash Patel

James Comey wrote “love letters” to the ADL and embedded FBI agents with them - a group that ran disgraceful ops spying on Americans. That era is OVER. This FBI won’t partner with political fronts masquerading as watchdogs.

Saved - June 8, 2025 at 6:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation began with a claim that white people are uniquely persecuted for wanting to be left alone in their own countries, with an assertion that Jews are responsible for this persecution. In response, another participant pointed out that predominantly white nations have historically invaded non-white nations, citing conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and support for wars in Syria, Yemen, and Palestine. They argued that these nations do not leave others alone, suggesting a connection to their support for Israel.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

White people are the only group persecuted for wanting to be left alone in their own countries…. And Jews are the ones persecuting them… https://t.co/3QrOOuFA5x

@ChaiLife613 - Lior ✡️

Jews are the only people persecuted for wanting to be left the fuck alone.

@RyLiberty - Ryan Dawson

Pretty sure majority white nations invaded majority non whites nations recently like Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and supported the wars on Syria, Yemen and Palestine. They're also fighting each other in Ukraine and Russia. So they don't leave people alone either because they serve israel

Saved - May 30, 2025 at 1:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
As I age, so does my family, and I need to focus on some family matters for an extended period. I won't be able to participate in the Backlash show regularly, but I’ll still make occasional guest appearances and continue posting on X and Telegram. Thanks for your understanding!

@davincentjames - Vincent James

As I get older so does my family… With that said, I have some family stuff I am going to have to tend to go quite a while. Because of this I will not be able to do the Backlash show regularly. I will however appear as an infrequent guest from time to time on the show and on other shows and continue posting on X and telegram. I’m not sure how long this will be for but it could be a long while. Thanks for understanding and keep up the fight all of you!

Saved - April 3, 2025 at 6:49 PM

@davincentjames - Vincent James

This singular clip will prove that Candace Owens is objectively correct when she says there’s a secret cabal of Jews controlling the Trump administration… https://t.co/3RMcahSBTD

@stillgray - Ian Miles Cheong

Candace Owens says nefarious Jews control the White House and are puppeteering Donald Trump and RFK Jr. to do Israel’s bidding and that these Jews are going to destroy free speech by rewriting the Bible. “You can accept that or you cannot accept that, but it’s just the reality.” https://t.co/hzocDUrcVr

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that opposition to Israeli policies is being labeled antisemitism, and free speech is threatened. They allege that the definition of antisemitism is being broadened, even to include parts of the Bible, and that the Trump administration is pushing this on college campuses. The speaker references a senate hearing on antisemitism where Rabbi Levi Shemtov called for hate speech laws, using rhetoric similar to Ibram X. Kendi's "anti-racist" stance. The speaker suggests that the Trump administration is now enacting policies similar to those they opposed during the BLM movement, but this time in the name of combating antisemitism, which the speaker believes is actually for the benefit of Israel. They feel Netanyahu is running the White House and that Trump is supporting Israel at the detriment to American freedom.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You've got the human health secretary, RFK junior, saying, oh, we we we have to declare this an epidemic. And what we're really talking about is people voicing opinions against Israel's policies on blowing up Palestinian kids. You can accept that or you cannot accept that. It is just the reality. And if you don't understand how close we are inching to them destroying free speech, and once speech goes, everything else goes, then you need to start paying attention. They are redefining antisemitism to even be parts of the bible. They are saying that it is antisemitism, and the Trump administration is pushing this on college campuses, to even suggest that a Jewish person might be more loyal to Israel than they are to America. That's totally plausible. It's it's it's totally plausible that a black person in America might be more loyal to Uganda than they are to America. Look at that. That is like, what do we even why are we redefining this? Portions of the bible? I mean, it's getting crazy. So I wanna show you this senate hearing. So they had another senate hearing, like the one that I showed up on, except this one. It it was on antisemitism on college campuses. And I want you to listen to what this rabbi got up and said as he called for hate speech laws. Okay? This is rabbi Levi Shemtov. He is the executive vice president of American Friends of Lubavitch. This this is like a Lubavitcher who I spoke about, and RFK junior came and said, don't speak about Lubavitch. And I said, is actually a very radical form of Judaism. Here is what he said. Listen to him standing up. Rabbi Levi Shemtov, here's what he wants for America. Speaker 1: Antisemitism is not just an age old prejudice. It is a contemporary crisis manifesting on campuses across the nation. It is not enough for individuals or institutions to merely claim they are not antisemitic. As my father once taught me, it is not enough for people, especially public figures, to be neutral or not be antisemitic. One must be anti antisemitic. Speaker 0: That is the exact same rhetoric, okay, as Ibram x Kendi during the peak of BLM saying it's not enough to be racist. You have to actively be anti racist. It's exact same rhetoric. Okay? There's no way to slice it. So what is happening right now that we, meaning the people who voted for and have supported Trump for years and got him into office because he we actually were standing up to him when BLM was going crazy and calling everybody white supremacists and people while Trump was in office, there were George George Floyd riots. People that stood up for him and said, this is wrong, are now watching his administration execute the exact same thing, but this time it's for antisemitism. And it's not even for antisemitism, really. It's because this is not helpful to Jews in America. It's for Israel. Like, it feels like Netanyahu is running the White House, and Trump's just signing and doing whatever they say. Right? It feels like Netanyahu should be sitting in the Oval Office as they demand hate speech laws, and they get what they want. Every day, they're announcing something that they're gonna do to further support Israel. And that something is now looking to me like a detriment to American freedom. And if you can't see that, okay, it is time for you to take off the rose colored glasses. Because just because Trump was against all of this in 2016 does not mean that he does not have people that are around him who are for this now that we are in 02/2025.
Saved - February 28, 2025 at 5:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm frustrated that we're never getting access to these files. It's concerning when both the FBI director and deputy director prioritize Israel so heavily. Plus, the lack of transparency around the JFK documents raises questions about potential concealment related to Mossad's involvement.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

We’re literally never getting these files… https://t.co/XqtZb3fczv

@davincentjames - Vincent James

If both the director and deputy director of the FBI are saying Israel is the most important country to them… We have a major problem. https://t.co/EPmKAedxiO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The cause closest to my heart is the defense of Israel. My top priority is to stop the flow of money to Iran. We must free the hundred hostages, including Israelis, Americans, and others, held captive by Hamas and Iran's Hezbollah mercenaries. It is crucial for America to recognize the importance of Israel, ensure the safe return of all hostages, and reaffirm its support for Israel, our most important ally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What what cause is dear to your heart? Cause is dear to my Israel, defense of Israel. What is number one? We will shut off the machinery that feeds money into Iran. We will no longer have a hundred hostages still in captivity, Israeli and American and otherwise, by Hamas and Iran's Hezbollah mercenary forces. We need America to wake up and prioritize Israel and bring home Israelis and make sure we stand by our number one ally in Israel.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Nixon knew. And they got rid of him. https://t.co/t5uBz5wzZ9

Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to examine sensitive locations with Jewish involvement. Jews are present throughout the government, and it's crucial for us to infiltrate those areas. We need to place a non-Jewish individual in charge.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. I wanna look at any sensitive areas around where Jews are involved. See, the Jews are all through the government, and we have got to get in those areas. We've got to get the man in charge who is not

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Or the JFK documents… https://t.co/yBnE5JLBTe

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Are you planning to conceal Mossad's involvement in JFK's assassination due to your father's background and the money you and Comer receive from AIPAC? https://t.co/wd4BFQLbbG

Video Transcript AI Summary
To understand the Kennedy assassination, you have to look at Israel and the pursuit of nuclear weapons. Prime Minister of Israel said nuclear weapons were vital for survival. Kennedy insisted on neutral scientists inspecting the reactor. Israel deceived inspectors with a fake control room. Kennedy felt betrayed, stating they lied about their nuclear capabilities. The Jewish community invited JFK to Dallas, sponsored by Julia Sheps of B'nai B'rith. Abraham Zapruder, also a B'nai B'rith member, filmed the assassination. Shots may have come from a building owned by David Weisblatt, a major ADL financier. Sam Bloom pushed for Oswald's transfer when he was killed by Jakob Rubinstein (Jack Ruby). The reactor achieved criticality after Kennedy's death, and Israel acquired the bomb shortly after.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can't talk about the Kennedy assassination without talking about Israel, without talking about the Messiah. They're the main people involved. That's the main group involved. The prime minister of Israel at the time said that without nuclear weapons, Israel would not survive. Kennedy was asking and asking and asking for neutral scientists to observe the reactor. They continue to push for this with CIA director McConne and finally was granted access. Israel, prior to the visit, set up a fake control room with fake control panels, and part of the agreement was that the inspectors were never going to be able to inspect the actual reactor. After that visit, Kennedy was quoted in saying, those sons of bitches lie to me constantly about their nuclear capability. The Jewish community invites JFK to come to Dallas, which was sponsored by the Dallas Citizens Council, which was directed by Julia Sheps, who was a member of the local B'nai B'rith organization, the ADL B'nai B'rith once again. A confirmed member of the local B'nai B'rith as well, Abraham Zapruder was also just so happened to be the guy that caught the assassination on film. Zapruder was also a manufacturer headquartered in the Dallas Textiles Building. According to ballistic studies, it was from that building. The first two shots were fired and missed. The building was owned by David Weisblatt, one of the biggest financiers of the Anti Defamation League, and Douglas Jaffe, one of the biggest donors to Lyndon B. Johnson. The host committee that invited Kennedy to the event in Dallas was chaired by a guy named Sam Bloom. According to Dallas police, it was Bloom who pushed the hardest for the police to transfer Lee Harvey Oswald from the Dallas police station to the Dallas County jail. Now it was during that transfer that Jack Ruby shot Oswald. What was Jack Ruby's real last name? Jakob Rubinstein. The reactor went critical right after Kennedy died, and they got the bomb a year or two later. That's kind of a coincidence, isn't it? That's kind of a strange coincidence. Kennedy dies? Israel gets the gets the bump.

@RepLuna - Rep. Anna Paulina Luna

Do you have questions about the new Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets? Here's all you need to know 👇🏻

Video Transcript AI Summary
As part of the House Oversight Committee, the Task Force on Declassification of Federal Secrets is a historic step toward giving answers to the American people. President Trump has directed the declassification of records relating to the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King. We will also look into documents related to UAPs, the origins of COVID-19, the Epstein client list, and details surrounding the death of Osama bin Laden. Our first hearing in March will focus on President Kennedy's assassination. We've engaged with agencies to get briefings and will review documents, marking them for release. We'll travel for research, meet with witnesses and experts, and provide transparency through hearings, reports, and document releases. We seek to coordinate with the administration to ensure the American people receive the documents needed to answer long-asked questions and regain trust through transparency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The task force on the declassification of federal secrets has been organized under the House Oversight Committee and represents a historic step towards transparency and delivering answers to the American people. President Trump has already taken steps to deliver to the American people information that for far too long has been kept under the federal government's lock and key through classification. Under executive order fourteen seventeen six, president Trump has directed the federal government to prepare reports regarding the declassification of records regarding the assassinations of president John f Kennedy, senator Robert f Kennedy, and the reverend doctor Martin Luther King. The task force will also examine agency's knowledge and possession of documents regarding other areas of significant public interest, including UAPs, the origins of COVID nineteen, the Epstein client list, and details surrounding the death of Osama bin Laden in Operation Neptune Spear. Our first hearing is March and will focus on the assassination of President Kennedy. We have already engaged with relevant agencies to provide briefings this month regarding the universe of documents connected to these areas of interest. Upon receiving these briefings, we'll move immediately to review documents and if necessary, earmark them for a release to the American people. The task force will travel as necessary to conduct research and meet with relevant witnesses and experts who may also be called to speak in a public setting. We will work closely with the committee to provide transparency through hearings, reports, and the release of documents. It's important to note that we don't have documents yet, and we also don't hold declassification authority. The task force seeks to operate with coordination with the administration to ensure that the American people receive the documents needed to answer questions that we have been all asking for far too long. We will regain the trust of the American people through transparency.
Saved - February 24, 2025 at 8:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I mentioned that Epstein was an intelligence asset for Middle Eastern interests, but I'm unsure which country. Someone responded, claiming he was a Mossad agent, which seems widely accepted. My frustration is evident with the current state of leadership in the FBI.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

“Epstein was an intelligence asset for people in the Middle East… I don’t know which country though.” Are you serious?? Bro, he was a Mossad agent and everyone know this but you. @dbongino https://t.co/HBKbrr6l7w

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was once told by a reporter at Fox that Epstein was an intelligence asset for people in the Middle East. The reporter was sure that Epstein was either a witting or unwitting asset, and that his plane and island were likely bugged with cameras. There's a misconception that Epstein was the sole owner of the videotapes, but that's not the case. According to the source, others had them too, which is why the blackmail story makes sense. I'm unsure which Middle Eastern countries are involved, but the reporter swore that Epstein was an intelligence asset. It's possible that these countries are using the videos to influence powerful decision-makers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About a year and a half after that, I'm in a green room at Fox, and I'm not gonna say who because they didn't give me permission to share it, but well, the sure story, but I don't who they are. Says, you know, Epstein's an an intelligence asset for people in The Middle East. Right? I'm like, no. I didn't know that. I'm like, you sure that? Person, let's say, is like, I'm absolutely sure of that. That he's either a witting or unwitting asset, intelligence asset. Meaning, his plane and that island, the cameras, there's a big assumption out there that these videotapes were exclusively in the custody of Epstein. That's a huge mistake. The reason they wanted this story to go away is because there's an assumption like, oh, yeah. Epstein had him. No. He wasn't the only one who had him according to the source. These assets that's why this blackmail story makes so much sense. Which Middle Eastern countries they are? I don't know. But this person who's a very, good reporter I mean, aces. Right? Swore Epstein was either a winning or unwitting intelligence asset, and they may have had his plane wired up, and they're the ones who have all this stuff. So the point is, to sum it up, how how do you know some of these countries aren't going to some of these power players who aren't making decisions because, hey, he wouldn't want this video out there. Right? How do you know? A %. I mean, that Let's let's get purse

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Oh brother…

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Our New FBI deputy director ladies and gentlemen… https://t.co/hfPsiAoGSH

@davincentjames - Vincent James

“Epstein was an intelligence asset for people in the Middle East… I don’t know which country though.” Are you serious?? Bro, he was a Mossad agent and everyone know this but you. @dbongino https://t.co/HBKbrr6l7w

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was once told by a reporter at Fox that Epstein was an intelligence asset for people in the Middle East. This person was absolutely sure that Epstein was either knowingly or unknowingly working as an intelligence asset. It's a mistake to assume that Epstein was the only one with access to the videotapes from his plane and island. The reason some people wanted the Epstein story to disappear is because many assume that Epstein was the only one who had damaging information on powerful people. According to my source, that is not the case. It makes sense that the blackmail story is more widespread than people know. I do not know which Middle Eastern countries were involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About a year and a half after that, I'm in a green room at Fox, and I'm not gonna say who because they didn't give me permission to share it, but well, the sure story, but I don't who they are. Says, you know, Epstein's an an intelligence asset for people in The Middle East. Right? I'm like, no. I didn't know that. I'm like, you sure that? Person, let's say, is like, I'm absolutely sure of that. That he's either a witting or unwitting asset, intelligence asset. Meaning, his plane and that island, the cameras, there's a big assumption out there that these videotapes were exclusively in the custody of Epstein. That's a huge mistake. The reason they wanted this story to go away is because there's an assumption like, oh, yeah. Epstein had him. No. He wasn't the only one who had him according to the source. These assets that's why this blackmail story makes so much sense. Which Middle Eastern countries they are? I don't know. But this person who's a very, good reporter I mean, aces. Right? Swore Epstein was either a winning or unwitting intelligence asset, and they may have had his plane wired up, and they're the ones who have all this stuff. So the point is, to sum it up, how how do you know some of these countries aren't going to some of these power players who aren't making decisions because, hey, he wouldn't want this video out there. Right? How do you know? A %. I mean, that Let's let's get purse
Saved - February 24, 2025 at 8:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe the new FBI deputy director is unaware of Epstein's connections. It's common knowledge he was a Mossad agent. Meanwhile, Kash Patel's focus seems to be on getting Americans to prioritize Israel. What's going on here?

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Our New FBI deputy director ladies and gentlemen… https://t.co/hfPsiAoGSH

@davincentjames - Vincent James

“Epstein was an intelligence asset for people in the Middle East… I don’t know which country though.” Are you serious?? Bro, he was a Mossad agent and everyone know this but you. @dbongino https://t.co/HBKbrr6l7w

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was once told by a reporter at Fox that Epstein was an intelligence asset for people in the Middle East. This person was absolutely sure that Epstein was either a witting or unwitting asset, meaning that his plane and island were likely equipped with cameras. There's a misconception that Epstein was the sole owner of these videotapes, but according to my source, that's a huge mistake. The blackmail story makes sense when you consider that other entities may have had access to this information. I don't know which Middle Eastern countries are involved, but this reporter swore that Epstein was an intelligence asset, and they may have had his plane wired. How do we know that some of these countries aren't influencing powerful decision-makers with compromising videos?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About a year and a half after that, I'm in a green room at Fox, and I'm not gonna say who because they didn't give me permission to share it, but well, the sure story, but I don't who they are. Says, you know, Epstein's an an intelligence asset for people in The Middle East. Right? I'm like, no. I didn't know that. I'm like, you sure that? Person, let's say, is like, I'm absolutely sure of that. That he's either a witting or unwitting asset, intelligence asset. Meaning, his plane and that island, the cameras, there's a big assumption out there that these videotapes were exclusively in the custody of Epstein. That's a huge mistake. The reason they wanted this story to go away is because there's an assumption like, oh, yeah. Epstein had him. No. He wasn't the only one who had him according to the source. These assets that's why this blackmail story makes so much sense. Which Middle Eastern countries they are? I don't know. But this person who's a very, good reporter I mean, aces. Right? Swore Epstein was either a winning or unwitting intelligence asset, and they may have had his plane wired up, and they're the ones who have all this stuff. So the point is, to sum it up, how how do you know some of these countries aren't going to some of these power players who aren't making decisions because, hey, he wouldn't want this video out there. Right? How do you know? A %. I mean, that Let's let's get purse

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Our new FBI director… https://t.co/gJUUnggLLc

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Kash Patel’s first order of business for America?… Make sure Americans “wake up and prioritize Israel.” https://t.co/2joT3J4ZwN

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're going to cut off the funding streams to Iran. This action aims to resolve the hostage situation involving Israelis, Americans, and others held by Hamas and Hezbollah, who are essentially mercenaries of Iran. It's time for America to recognize the importance of Israel, secure the release of the Israeli hostages, and reaffirm our commitment to standing by Israel, our most important ally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We will shut off the machinery that feeds money into Iran. We will no longer have a hundred hostages still in captivity, Israeli and American and otherwise, by Hamas and Iran's Hezbollah mercenary forces. We need America to wake up and prioritize Israel and bring home Israelis and make sure we stand by our number one ally in Israel.
Saved - February 24, 2025 at 8:36 AM

@davincentjames - Vincent James

In his very first move as the new house speaker of America, Mike Johnson pledges support for Israel. Billions more in military and monetary aid are on the way! https://t.co/4Jo535cn3m

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are facing an extraordinary crisis, and the world needs us to be strong. Turmoil and violence are happening in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, and tensions are rising in the Indo-Pacific. Our nation needs strong leadership, and we must stand firm. Our greatest ally in the Middle East is under attack. The first bill I will bring to the floor will support our friend Israel. It's time to get this done and show Israel and the world that the barbarism of Hamas is wretched and wrong. We will stand for the good in this conflict.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Extraordinary crisis right now, and the world needs us to be strong. They need us to remember our creed and our admonition. Turmoil and violence have rocked the Middle East and Eastern Europe. We all know it. Intentions continue to build in the Indo Pacific. The country demands strong leadership of this body, and we must not waver. Our our nation's greatest ally in The Middle East is under attack. The first bill that I'm gonna bring to this floor in just a little while will be in support of our dear friend Israel, and we're overdue in getting that done. We're going to show not only Israel, but the entire world that the barbarism of Hamas that we have all seen play out on our television screen screens is wretched and wrong, and we are gonna stand for the good in that conflict.
Saved - February 24, 2025 at 8:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
My first priority is to ensure Americans wake up and focus on supporting Israel. Following this, Mike Johnson, in his inaugural move as House Speaker, has also pledged strong support for Israel, promising billions more in military and monetary aid.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Kash Patel’s first order of business for America?… Make sure Americans “wake up and prioritize Israel.” https://t.co/2joT3J4ZwN

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're going to cut off the funding streams to Iran. We can't continue to have a hundred hostages, including Israelis and Americans, held captive by Hamas and Hezbollah, who are essentially mercenaries of Iran. America needs to recognize the importance of our alliance with Israel, ensure the safe return of all Israeli hostages, and reaffirm our unwavering support for Israel as our top ally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We will shut off the machinery that feeds money into Iran. We will no longer have a 100 hostages still in captivity, Israeli and American and otherwise by Hamas and Iran's Hezbollah mercenary forces. We need America to wake up and prioritize Israel and bring home Israelis and make sure we stand by our number one ally in Israel.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Similar vibes…

@davincentjames - Vincent James

In his very first move as the new house speaker of America, Mike Johnson pledges support for Israel. Billions more in military and monetary aid are on the way! https://t.co/4Jo535cn3m

Video Transcript AI Summary
The world is facing an extraordinary crisis, with turmoil and violence in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, and rising tensions in the Indo-Pacific. Strong leadership is needed now. Our greatest ally in the Middle East, Israel, is under attack. The first bill I will bring to the floor will support our friend Israel. We're overdue in getting this done. We must show Israel, and the entire world, that the barbarism of Hamas is wretched and wrong. We will stand for the good in this conflict.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Extraordinary crisis right now, and the world needs us to be strong. They need us to remember our creed and our admonition. Turmoil and violence have rocked the Middle East and Eastern Europe. We all know it. Intentions continue to build in the Indo Pacific. The country demands strong leadership of this body, and we must not waver. Our our nation's greatest ally in The Middle East is under attack. The first bill that I'm gonna bring to this floor in just a little while will be in support of our dear friend Israel, and we're overdue in getting that done. We're going to show not only Israel, but the entire world that the barbarism of Hamas that we have all seen play out on our television screen screens is wretched and wrong, and we are gonna stand for the good in that conflict.
Saved - December 25, 2024 at 11:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored the origins of terms like "melting pot" and "nation of immigrants," questioning who popularized them and their motivations. A Jewish American writer noted that diversity enhances safety for Jews, as a mixed society reduces targets for hate. Anthony Bourdain echoed this sentiment, envisioning a utopia without a dominant white presence. I discussed the role of Jewish organizations in advocating for immigration, including a significant letter from over 1,200 rabbis. The influence of figures like JFK and Ted Kennedy on immigration policy was also highlighted, emphasizing their efforts to reshape America's demographic landscape.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Where did the terms “melting pot” and “nation of immigrants” come from really?… Why would this one group be responsible for popularizing these terms and changing America into a multicultural nation with more pro-immigration policies? How do they benefit? Thread 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
America has long been described as a "melting pot," a term popularized in the early 20th century, but its origins and implications are often misrepresented. The phrase gained traction in the 1960s, largely due to a book by John F. Kennedy, and is frequently invoked by politicians and media to emphasize immigration. However, the historical context reveals that early immigration laws favored European settlers, with significant restrictions on other groups. The Hart-Celler Act of 1965 dramatically changed immigration patterns, leading to a surge in non-European immigrants. This shift has sparked debates about cultural identity and welfare dependency. Ultimately, America was founded by settlers who shaped its identity, and the narrative of it being solely a nation of immigrants overlooks this foundational aspect.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They paid the fare to America, and then they melted in. The lovely lady Liberty with her book of recipes and the finest one she's got. Speaker 1: The good old days of Schoolhouse Rock. The song you just heard called the Great American Melting Pot written by Lynn Ahrens and Lori Lieberman, 2 famous Jewish American composers was pumped into my head as a kid almost every single morning before school. It played on the TVs of several million American children before their school day and then was reiterated to all of us again and again over and over throughout our entire time in American academia. But is it true? Was America really always founded as a melting pot of all different races and countless cultures? Was America truly founded and meant to be by our founding fathers to be a nation of immigrants from all over the world? As you can see this phrase melting pot first started being used around 190 8. The origination seems to come from a play written and performed by Israel Zangwill. Wikipedia describes this play as follows. The play depicts the life of a Russian Jewish immigrant family, the Kishanos. David Kishano has survived a pogrom which killed his mother and sister and he wishes to forget this horrible event. He composes an American Symphony and wants to look forward to society free of ethnic divisions and hatred rather than backward at his traumatic past. Now, the last time I checked, the Declaration of Independence was signed in 17/76 and 190 8, the year when the phrase melting pot first started to be used was 132 years after that. But let's move on. How many times have you heard from your politician, your president, your standard Hollywood actor, and your local SJW that we are a nation of immigrants. America is a nation of immigrants. Speaker 2: We are a nation of immigrants. Speaker 3: We are a nation of immigrants. Speaker 1: We're a Speaker 4: nation of immigrants. Speaker 1: The next thing that follows the statement is usually some cringey cliche about the Statue of Liberty that's historically inaccurate. Right? Speaker 2: And in the harbor is the Statue of Liberty reminding us of who we are and where we came from. Speaker 1: See? Almost every single time. The Statue of Liberty though was a gift given to the US from France to honor the centennial of American independence. The poem upon it which was written by Jewish writer Emma Lazarus, as you know, give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera, was a later add on and by Lazarus about her major concern which was the Russian pogroms against the Jews happening in czars, Russia at the time. Lazarus was asked in 18/83 to contribute a manuscript to an effort by New York socialites to help raise money for the pedestal on which the statue was to be erected. She at first resisted, but then ultimately decided to take the opportunity to further her real concern which was the Russian Jews and the pogroms that were happening at the time. E Pluribus Unum explicitly commemorates the union of 13 British colonies into 1 nation. The statue and the motto do not celebrate immigration. They salute the achievement of the settlers who founded those colonies and in time, won independence from their mother country. The poem on the Statue of Liberty has absolutely nothing to do with people vying for America to accept more and more immigrants, but has everything to do with what Lazarus was actually going through at the time. Anything else that is taught to you is historically inaccurate and completely made up by pro open borders advocacy groups. Now what about the term a nation of immigrants? Surely, this phrase has been around since the Statue of Liberty was built up at least, right? Wrong. As you can see, this phrase wasn't even used until it became popular in the 19 sixties. It was popularized after the ADL asked John f Kennedy to write a book with the same title that became part of a series by the ADL called A One Nation Library. Speaker 4: I'm honored to receive this award from an organization which, on its 50th anniversary, should itself be receiving an honor for distinguished contribution to the enrichment of America's democratic legacy. Your tireless pursuit of equality of treatment for all Americans has made a lasting and substantial contribution to our democracy. Speaker 1: As you can see, this phrase was literally a pro open borders marketing slogan created by the ADL, a Jewish organization with over a 100 years of history in the US whose current CEO called Donald Trump anti semitic for using the word globalist during one of his meetings. Speaker 3: So it sort of developed and originated in certain extremist circles populated by white supremacists. But make no mistake, where the term originates from is a reference to Jewish people. It is not a coincidence that the word globalist is used to refer to Jared Kushner and Gary Cohn and Steve Mnuchin, the most prominent Jewish members of Trump's team of advisers. It is really disturbing when the president or his advisers like Mick Mulvaney or others in the media literally parrot this term which is rooted in prejudice. No. A president should not use the term globalist. Speaker 1: The ADL also gave JFK the award he talked about earlier in that clip after writing his book. Now, this phrase that you constantly hear in your schools on TV and movies and from your politicians came into mass use only 60 years ago. This was also right around the time that America's immigration system was starting to be called racist. This as you know eventually led to the US going from a healthy mix of mostly western style European immigrants in 1950 to a massive increase in immigration which is now pretty much only coming from Mexico. Speaker 5: There was a feeling in congress that that same notion of ending discrimination should also be applied to US immigration policy. Up until 1965, US immigration policy was heavily biased in favor of European. Speaker 1: So what exactly changed? What law was passed that the American people had no say in? What act was signed that sent us millions of a type of immigrant that is over 3 quarters on 1 or more welfare program that tears down our statues demanding change in our country that hoist no other flag but the flag of their homeland while advocating the government be overthrown, that say it's racist to be White and that bring a mob destruction to those who advocate for a secure border less government and the restoration as well as the protection of our constitution. Protection of our constitution. Well, in comes Emmanuel Seller, one of the main creators and the driving hammer on the nail that is the Hart Seller Act of 1960 5. Who is he? Well, his biography describes him as a Jewish American congressman who died of pneumonia in 1981. It goes on to talk about his major role in pushing for the legislation that eventually was successful in changing what they called back then the unjust Within his bio, he Within his bio, he has quoted in saying, yes, I fought against the unjust restriction of immigration. But who was the face of this bill exactly? Who would be the one to get it through the senate after seller crafted it? Well, remember the guy who kicked off the slogan a nation of immigrants for the ADL? Well, his flesh and blood and brother Ted Kennedy was tapped for this job. After the bill was signed into law, Ted Kennedy, the literal lady killer himself trotted out on stage and promised the following about this bill. Out of deference to the critics, I want to comment on what the bill will not do. First, our cities will not be flooded with a 1000000 immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains exactly the same. Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset. Contrary to the charges in some quarters, this bill will not inundate America with any immigrant from any one country or area or the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia. In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think. Thirdly, the bill will not permit the entry of subversive persons, criminals, illiterates, or those with contagious diseases or serious mental illnesses. As I noted a moment ago, no immigrant visa will be issued to a person who is likely to become a public charge. Speaker 6: Yet the 50 year old single mother who entered the US by swimming across the Rio Grande has government funded housing, medication, and $700 a month in social security. Speaker 1: Obviously, that entire statement was a complete 100% lie as we know today. But then after he lied on stage, another Kennedy, Robert Kennedy was shrouded out on stage as well and promised the following about the bill. In fact, he says, the distribution of limited quota immigration can have no significant effect on the ethnic balance of the United States. Total quota immigration is now 156,782. Under the proposed bill, it would rise slightly to only 164,482. Obviously, this is way, way off. But before the 1965 Hart Celler Act, our immigration and naturalization laws were a lot more similar to immigration acts that were outlined by the founders and forefathers of America. Nationality acts like the Naturalization Act of 17 90 which stated that should any alien wish to become naturalized in America, they would first have to be a free white person of good moral character that has resided in the country for at least 2 years. This was specifically written in the bill. Throughout the years of course, this was amended several times including in 17/95 where they even made it harder to become a naturalized citizen extending the minimum of 2 years residing in the country to 5 years in the country. Then in 17/98 making it at least 14 years and allowing the children of naturalized citizens to obtain birthright citizenship. All of which still kept the free white person of good moral character statement in the first lines of the bills. This immigration and naturalization law of 1798 stayed exactly the same all the way up until 5 years after the American Civil War when it was changed again in 18/70 to allow freed black slaves to become citizens of America. From 18/70 TO 19/24, immigration and naturalization pretty much remained exactly the same. As America was growing and only had around 50 to 90,000,000 people in population, infrastructure needed to be built and thus immigrants from Ireland, Italy, Britain and the Scandinavian countries was started to flow in. Contrary to what you're taught in your schools as you can see, slaves did not build this country, its infrastructure, its canals, its bridges or its skyscrapers. The Irish and Italians mostly did, but I digress. This all changed in 1920 when President Warren G. Harding signed the Emergency Quota Act into law in 1921. According to the new law, annual immigration from any country cannot exceed 3% of the total number of US immigrants from that same country as recorded in the US Census of 1910. Then the Immigration Act of 1924 went even further limiting total annual immigration to 165,000 and fixing quotas of immigrants from specific countries. For instance, the act which some know as the Johnson Reed Act completely banned immigration of Eastern European Jews. This was due to the recent Russian Revolution of 1917 which was started by Leon Trotsky aka Leon Braunstein and Vladimir Lenin who were both Eastern European Jews. It was meant to keep subversives like them out of the country along with anyone who followed the ideology of Karl Marx who was also an European Jew. This act of course was only opposed by Emanuel Seller who as you know now would change this all in immigration altogether as we know it later on. Imagine my shock. But before Seller got his subversive disgusting hands on our immigration system, yet another immigration act would pass. This act passed in 1952. It's known as the McCarron Walter Act. The law was held by supporters as a necessary step to preventing communist subversion in the United States while opponents decried the legislation of course as being xenophobic and discriminatory. The act opposed by Emmanuel Seller kept the quotas the same and immigrants from Great Britain, Ireland and Germany were allotted 2 thirds of the total 154,000 spots available each year. However, the act did specifically remove previously established barriers that had acted to exclude immigrants from nations such as Japan and China. These countries were now assigned a very small portion of the annual quota. But still, as you can see, keeping our immigration coming mostly from First World Europe where immigrants had an easier time of assimilation. It banned admission to anyone declared a subversive by the attorney general and indicated that members of communist and communist front organizations were subject to deportation. I like that style. Now, what would have happened if no immigration happened at all? What would have happened if there was never an Ellis Island or any immigration acts at all after the founding and independence of our country? One demographic study concluded that had there been no immigration at all after 17/90, the settlers posterity alone including African slaves and Freeman's descendants would have grown by 1990 to approximately half the size of the population in 1990 which implies roughly half of all Americans today still have roots in the founding stock whose existence the nation of immigrants creed denies. The federal structure that the founding fathers erected for the United States is firmly grounded in their British heritage and American experience. Now those who signed the declaration in the constitution of course knew of lock and enlightenment philosophies, but they knew their native law best, the English common law. Common law remains the bedrock of every state's law today with the unique exception of Louisiana. The rights of Englishmen were the animating spirit of the bill of rights meant to secure them more effectively in America than they often were in England. So you see, America is a country of settlers and conquerors of western culture. The America they had in mind was to remain western. And regardless of what anyone tries to tell you on the TV, millions upon millions of Americans are neither immigrants nor descendants of immigrants but rather descendants of the settlers who built and freed this country from Britain. Can you imagine what would happen if China was in our place allowing millions of people to flow from south of their border into their country, who according to all studies are mostly on welfare. Could you imagine what the Chinese would say or do if then said immigrants were to say that their culture is racist, everything about them is racist, and that they must change to become more tolerant to the soft invaders? Yeah. Me neither.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

As this Jewish American writer for The NY Times explains, diversity and a mixed up nation makes Jews safer. Everyone’s so mixed up you don’t know who to “hate” and another holocaust could never happen. Brett Stephens on immigration: https://t.co/Ght0leCV7r

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jews thrive and feel safe in a world where liberal values prevail. The Trump administration represents a significant regression from these values. Its stance on immigration, particularly towards Mexicans and Latin Americans, is concerning. Being anti-immigrant contradicts the liberal principles that have benefited us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, the second thing is Jews, I think, have only really thrived and are only really safe in the world when liberal values are the dominant prevalent values. The Trump administration represents a substantial and dangerous regression from those values. I think the comments, the attitude of this administration towards immigration, Mexican immigration, Latin American immigration is a scandal. To be anti immigrant strikes me as antithetical to the liberal values that have been so good for us as

@davincentjames - Vincent James

The late Jewish American actor, Anthony Bourdain, once said “it will be a utopia” when there are no white people anymore and everyone’s so mixed up “you don’t know who to hate.” https://t.co/dL6J16ZfEB

Video Transcript AI Summary
The future may see a blending of cultures and ethnicities, leading to a world where distinct racial identities fade. This mixing could create a society where divisions based on race diminish, similar to the diverse model seen in Singapore. While achieving this vision will take time, it represents a hopeful path forward, as interconnectedness may reduce animosity and conflict.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That the whole world will mix up with each other that in, I don't know, 70, 80 years, there will be no white people anymore and only cappuccino colored people. That's the only way. That's this is the only solution. It's my Yeah. Mix up. It's our only hope. It's our way out of this. Yes. It's gonna take some time, but it's really the only way. This this sort of Singaporean model where everybody's so mixed up that you really don't know who to hate because everybody's so hopelessly intertwined, but we're a long way from that.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

The Jerusalem Post blames the “lack of Jewish influence” for the anti-immigration stance of Eastern European countries then and now… https://t.co/bDg9xLFib3

@davincentjames - Vincent James

“We got over 1,200 rabbis to sign a letter asking the US not to halt or even to limit immigration into the US" -HIAS (Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society) https://t.co/xfp4LOcqqO

Video Transcript AI Summary
Last week, HIAS gathered over 1,200 rabbis to advocate for the continuation of the U.S. refugee admissions program. This remarkable consensus highlights the importance of supporting refugees. Founded 134 years ago, HIAS is the oldest refugee organization globally, dedicated to rescuing, resettling, and assisting refugees from diverse ethnic and religious backgrounds. With ten offices worldwide, HIAS is one of nine agencies resettling refugees in the U.S. and the only Jewish organization among them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Last week, HIAS organized a letter signed by over 1200 rabbis. Can you imagine getting 1200 rabbis to agree on one thing? But agreed they did. And what they agreed was to ask, elected officials not to halt or even to limit the United States refugee admissions program. At a 134 years old, HIAS is the oldest refugee organization in the world. We rescue, resettle, and aid refugees of all ethnic and religious backgrounds through 10 offices around the world and is one of 9 volunteer agencies resettling refugees in the US and the only Jewish organization amongst them.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

"Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural." Barbara Spectre, the founding director of the Institute for Jewish Studies Paideia in Sweden explains how Jews will play a leading role in the "transformation" of Europe. https://t.co/zVSs90EgIL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Europe is undergoing a significant transformation towards multiculturalism, and Jews will play a crucial role in this change. The continent is moving away from its historically monolithic societies, and this shift will likely lead to resentment towards Jews due to their prominent involvement. However, this leadership is essential for Europe's survival in this new multicultural landscape.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With the Greek name of paideia here in Stockholm. She believes that the Jews have an important role to play in a country undergoing profound change. Speaker 1: Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we're gonna be part of the throes of that of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not gonna be the monolithic, societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are gonna be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Jewish comedian Bill Maher and Jewish star Sharon (Levy) Osborne applaud the fact that London went from 90% white to 36% white. Says "its a great thing." They then go on to say it’s "awesome" that the tea shops have been replaced with kabab shops. https://t.co/qZapxnIR0y

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1984, London was predominantly white, but over 50 years, the demographic shifted from 86% white to 36% white. This change is seen as positive, with London now being a vibrant mix of cultures. Windsor, once known for its traditional English tea shops, has transformed as well. The town now features a variety of restaurants, including Arabic, Jamaican, and Chinese, reflecting its diverse population. The evolution of these areas into melting pots of culture is celebrated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But in 1984, I remember walking around London like it was all white. It was all white. Speaker 1: But you go outside of London out, but now it's totally changed. Speaker 0: It went from, I read this in Andrew Sullivan's column. It went from in 50 years, it went from, 86% white to 36% white. Speaker 1: Great. It's a fact. Speaker 0: It's a fact. And it's a happy fact. London is mostly people of color. Speaker 1: Yes. It is. Speaker 0: And I'm applauding it. Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: Happy for you. Happy. It's Speaker 1: you go to Windsor Windsor Castle. Okay? And the town, of course, is called Windsor. And it used to be, when I was a kid, all English tea shops with china and everybody used to go there for afternoon tea. And you'd go to Windsor Park and watch some polo. And now you go around there, there's no more fucking tea shops. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: None of that. Right. It's Arabic restaurants. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: It's Jamaican restaurants. It's Chinese. It is a complete and utter melting pot, and it's great. Speaker 0: And it's great. It's great. And there's always

@davincentjames - Vincent James

The term “a nation of immigrants” was first popularized after a book the ADL of Bnai Brith Helped JFK publish became popular. https://t.co/t5iYMquKz3

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Did you know that JFK gave a speech called “Nation of Immigrants” to the ADL of B’nai B’rith, months before leaders of B’nai B’rith invited him to the event in Dallas where he was eventually killed? This was also two years before the Hart-Celler immigration act was passed https://t.co/r4247gPLRG

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am honored to receive this award from an organization celebrating its 50th anniversary, which has significantly contributed to America's democratic legacy through its pursuit of equality. It is a privilege to be a citizen of this great republic, recognizing our heritage as descendants of millions who came here seeking new opportunities. In 1963, I am grateful to share this vision of a new world for all. This organization embodies the values that our country has upheld for 200 years and will continue to uphold in the future. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Schultz, mister vice president, mister Sherry, members of the Supreme Court, ladies and gentlemen, I'm honored to receive this award from an organization which, on its 50th anniversary, should itself be receiving an honor for distinguished contribution to the enrichment of America's democratic legacy. Your tireless pursuit of equality of treatment for all Americans has made a lasting and substantial contribution to our democracy. This is a great inheritance. It is a proud privilege to be a citizen of the great republic, to hear its song sung, to realize that we are the descendants of 40,000,000 people who left other countries, other familiar scenes, to come here to the United States to build a new life, to make a new opportunity for themselves and their children. I think it is not a burden, but a privilege to have the chance in 1963 to share that great concept which they felt so deeply among all of our people, to make this really as it was for them a new world, a new world for us and, indeed, for all those who look to us. That is what this organization has stood for for 50 years. That's what this country has stood for for 200 years, and that's what this country will continue to stand for. Thank you.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

JFK’s brother, Ted Kennedy, was key in getting the Hart Celler immigration act passed which eventually changed the face of America forever. When faced with pushback from white america, he said about the bill… https://t.co/Md3RKzluQ7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ted Kennedy addressed concerns about a new immigration bill after it was signed into law. He assured critics that the bill would not lead to a flood of one million immigrants annually, nor would it disrupt the country's ethnic mix. He emphasized that the immigration levels would remain unchanged and that the bill would not allow entry to subversives, criminals, or individuals likely to become public charges. In contrast, a claim was made about a single mother who entered the U.S. illegally and received government assistance, which was labeled as a complete falsehood.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ted Kennedy was tapped for this job. After the bill was signed into law, Ted Kennedy the literal lady killer himself trotted out on stage and promised the following about this bill. Out of deference to the critics, I want to comment on what the bill will not do. First, our cities will not be flooded with a 1000000 immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains exactly the same. Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset. Contrary to the charges in some quarters, this bill will not inundate America with any immigrant from any one country or area or the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia. In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think. Thirdly, the bill will not permit the entry of subversive persons, criminals, illiterates, or those with contagious diseases or serious mental illnesses. As I noted a moment ago, no immigrant visa will be issued to a person who is likely to become a public charge. Speaker 1: Yet the 50 year old single mother who entered the US by swimming across the Rio Grande has government funded housing, medication, and $700 a month in Social Security. Speaker 0: Obviously, that entire statement was a complete 100% lie as we know today.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

"I want to comment on what the bill will not do. First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually… Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset … Thirdly, the bill will not permit the entry of criminals or those likely to become a public charge” Ted Kennedy on passing the 1965 immigration act

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Right before his death, Ted Kennedy referred to the Talmud to justify the 1965 hart-celler act during a speech for the ADL… https://t.co/IDOUTJJ8qt

Video Transcript AI Summary
The 1965 act abolished the national origin quota system, allowing more Asians to immigrate to the U.S. Previously, only 125 Asians were permitted entry due to discriminatory policies. The Torah and Talmud emphasize the importance of welcoming strangers. Leviticus states that the stranger residing among you should be treated as a citizen, and you must love them as yourself, recalling the experience of being strangers in Egypt.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The 1965 act that eliminated, the national origin quota system and the Asian Pacific Triangle. Up to that year, we had a 125 Asians that were permitted to come in here, all based upon the discriminatory parts of American policy. The Torah and the Talmud teach us that we must welcome the stranger in our midst. It's written in Leviticus that the stranger who resides with you shall be to you as one of your citizens, and you shall love him as yourself for you were strangers in the land of Egypt.
Saved - December 15, 2024 at 2:09 PM

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Candace Owens is correct. Israel is responsible for the assassination of JFK It's all here. Everything you need to know in 2 minutes. https://t.co/XUiphbv4j7

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Kennedy assassination is closely linked to Israel and its nuclear ambitions. At the time, the Israeli Prime Minister emphasized the need for nuclear weapons for survival. Kennedy sought neutral observers for Israel's reactor, but they were misled during a visit, leading him to express frustration over their dishonesty regarding nuclear capabilities. The Jewish community invited JFK to Dallas, organized by local leaders with ties to the Anti-Defamation League. Abraham Zapruder, who filmed the assassination, had connections to a building where shots were reportedly fired. Sam Bloom, who chaired the host committee, advocated for transferring Lee Harvey Oswald, who was killed by Jack Ruby during the transfer. Notably, Israel's reactor went critical shortly after Kennedy's death, raising questions about timing and coincidence in their acquisition of nuclear weapons.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can't talk about the Kennedy assassination without talking about Israel, without talking about the messiah. They're the main people involved. That's the main group involved. The prime minister of Israel at the time said that without nuclear weapons, Israel would not survive. Kennedy was asking and asking and asking for neutral scientists to observe the reactor. They continue to push for this with CIA director McComb, and finally was granted access. Israel, prior to the visit, set up a fake control room with fake control panels, and part of the agreement was that the inspectors were never going to be able to inspect the actual reactor. After that visit, Kennedy was quoted in saying, those sons of bitches lie to me constantly about their nuclear capability. The Jewish community invites JFK to come to Dallas, which was sponsored by the Dallas Citizens Council, which was directed by Julia Scheps, who was a member of the local organization. The ADL once again, a confirmed member of the local as well. Abraham Zapruder was also just so happened to be the guy that caught the assassination on film. Zapruder was also a manufacturer headquartered in the Dallas, textiles building. According to ballistic studies, it was from that building the first two shots were fired and missed. The building was owned by David Weisblatt, one of the biggest financiers of the Anti Defamation League, and Douglas Jaffe, one of the biggest donors to Lyndon c Johnson. The host committee that invited Kennedy to the event in Dallas was chaired by a guy named Sam Bloom. According to Dallas police, it was Bloom who pushed the hardest for the police to transfer Lee Harvey Oswald from the Dallas police station to the Dallas County Jail. Now it was during that transfer that Jack Ruby shot Oswald. What was Jack Ruby's real last name? Jacob Rubinstein. The reactor went critical right after Kennedy died, and they got the bomb a year or 2 later. That's kind of a coincidence, isn't it? That's kind of a strange coincidence. Kennedy dies? Israel gets the he gets the bomb.
Saved - July 15, 2024 at 9:54 PM

@davincentjames - Vincent James

This was the celebration performance at the RNC after JD Vance was announced as VP pick https://t.co/2UmLrXZ2Ry

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator JD Vance from Ohio expresses gratitude to Rabbi Margarettin and the organization for their work with the recently incarcerated, emphasizing the importance of second chances. He praises the efforts to reintegrate individuals into society and support families. Vance affirms his support for helping people make positive changes and expresses admiration for the Jewish community.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Please join us in welcoming senator jd Vance from the great state of Ohio. Good evening, everybody. Wow. Well, I, I have I have so much to say, but first, let me let me offer a word of gratitude to rabbi Margarettin. Am I getting that right? This great organization. And thanks to all of you for being such a great crowd. What an incredible welcome to have here in New York. I just wanna say from the bottom of my heart, I I know you do a lot of work with folks who have been incarcerated, with bringing them back in the world. We we believe in a God who is a God of second chances. Right? And we wanna support people. Maybe they made the wrong decision the first time, but the second time, they're gonna get it right. They're gonna get it right with all of your help. So thank you all for what you do for the recently incarcerated, get them back into society, and give them a second chance. It's just so so important, and it speaks to your heart. We want families to be able to start. We want families to be able to grow, and we're gonna fight for it every step of the way. And I'm so proud of what all of you stand for. And in America, we love the Jews, ladies and gentlemen.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

https://t.co/cUoF7hmQcZ

@davincentjames - Vincent James

lol. But fr though might as well be

Saved - May 11, 2024 at 7:59 AM

@davincentjames - Vincent James

“40 beheaded babies” “Holocaust” “Antisemitism on college campuses must be illegal” https://t.co/viXzD1uu19

Video Transcript AI Summary
This administration must protect Jewish students from discrimination on campus. Anti-Semitism must be condemned. Remembering the Holocaust is crucial, especially with a rise in Holocaust denial among young adults. We must learn from history and take action against atrocities like the targeting of innocent civilians. Never again is now. Translation: It is important for the government to protect Jewish students from discrimination. Anti-Semitism must be condemned. Remembering the Holocaust is crucial, especially with a rise in Holocaust denial among young adults. We must learn from history and take action against atrocities like the targeting of innocent civilians. Never again is now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This administration refusing to protect our Jewish brothers and sisters as they wanna go to class. They wanna eat peacefully in dining halls, be okay in their dorms. I remember that discrimination upon race, denigrating someone upon race, blocking someone from a classroom wasn't okay in the 19 sixties. Do you hear me? And it is not okay today. This administration needs to stand up and stand against anti semitism. What else they're failing to learn from? I mean, yesterday, we celebrated 79 years since VE Day. The victory there in Europe, liberating Europe from Nazi terror. Earlier this week, we honored those 6,000,000 Jews that died in the holocaust. You're at a place in this country, a Harvard Harris poll just came out, where it said between the ages of 1829, one in 5 of those individuals don't believe the holocaust even existed. And on that note, I think it's important that we continue to tell the story of October 7th. When we talked to the Israeli officials, we mentioned 911. And they said, yes, it's similar. But I want you to understand why it's different. These disgusting barbaric terrorist, they're not going after soldiers. They're coming after babies and beheading them. We must do more. Never again is now.
Saved - May 9, 2024 at 9:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Bill Graham expressed his belief that the Zionist influence on the government needs to be addressed. Nixon agreed but couldn't openly say it. This post suggests that Nixon's knowledge of this issue led to his removal. Another post simply states "Nixon Knew."

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Bill Graham: "This Zionist stranglehold on the government must be broken or this country is going down the drain." Nixon: "You believe that?" Graham: "Yes" Nixon: "I believe that too but I can never say it." https://t.co/VPJkfsdmXt

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Nixon knew. And they got rid of him. https://t.co/kUT5swYv6n

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jews dominate the government, we need non-Jewish leaders in control.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jews are all in the government, and we have got to get in those areas. We've got to get a man in charge who is not Jewish to control the Jewish

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Nixon Knew https://t.co/1s65IvY3V0

@TruthNoticing - World Goyim Unite

@davincentjames @MuricanVeteran #NixonKnew https://t.co/7GFyQ4TjKR

Saved - April 24, 2024 at 8:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The JFK assassination conspiracy theories are discussed in these posts. The first post challenges the popular belief that the CIA was responsible for JFK's death, suggesting that the true culprits are being overlooked. The second post mentions the involvement of the CIA, while also questioning the Warren Commission's findings. The third post claims that the "CIA killed Kennedy" narrative was fabricated by Israel through Mossad agents in Hollywood.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Here is all you need to know about the main culprit in the assassination of JFK, and it wasn't the CIA... The whole "the CIA killed Kennedy" narrative is a Psyop made popular by Oliver Stone and Hollywood to take the blame off the true culprits. https://t.co/NgQiCFbB52

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Kennedy assassination is linked to Israel and nuclear weapons. Kennedy wanted neutral scientists to observe Israel's reactor, but they deceived him. Jewish community in Dallas, including Abraham Zapruder, played a role in Kennedy's visit. The assassination took place near a building owned by ADL financiers. Jack Ruby, whose real name was Jakob Rubinstein, killed Oswald. Israel's reactor went critical after Kennedy's death, leading to suspicions of a connection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can't talk about the Kennedy assassination without talking about Israel, without talking about the messiah. They're the main people involved. That that's the main group involved. The prime minister of Israel at the time said that without nuclear weapons, Israel would not survive. Kennedy was asking and asking and asking for neutral scientists to observe the reactor. They continue to push for with CIA director McComb, and finally was granted access. Israel, prior to the visit, set up a fake control room with fake control saying, those sons of bitches lie to me constantly about their nuclear capability. The Jewish community invites JFK to come to Dallas, which was sponsored by the Dallas Citizens Council, which was directed by Julia Scheps, who was a member of the local organization. The ADL once again, a confirmed member of the local as well, Abraham Zapruder, was also just so happened to be the guy that caught the assassination on film. Zapruder was also a manufacturer headquartered in the Dallas textiles building. According to ballistic studies, it was from that building the first two shots were fired and missed. The building was owned by David Weisblatt, one of the biggest financiers of the Anti Defamation League, and Douglas Jaffe, one of the biggest donors to Lyndon c Johnson. The host committee that invited Kennedy to the event in Dallas was chaired by a guy named Sam Bloom. According to Dallas police, it was Bloom who pushed the hardest for the police to transfer Lee Harvey Oswald from the Dallas police station to the Dallas County Jail. Now it was during that transfer that Jack Ruby shot Oswald. What was Jack Ruby's real last name? Jakob Rubinstein. The reactor went critical right after Kennedy died, and they got the bomb a year or 2 later. That's kind of a coincidence, isn't it? That's kind of a strange coincidence. Kennedy dies? Israel gets the he he gets the bump.

@unplugfitX - Myron Gaines

They won't declassify the JFK files when all the conspirators are dead... One thing we can CONFIRM is the CIA was involved. The Warren Commission was one of the biggest coverups in American History. There is NO WAY Oswald was the sole shooter. Trump said if you saw the JFK documents you wouldn't release them either. That is BONE CHILLING! What ELSE is the government hiding from us? WE know who killed JFK though...I will do a full pod with @RyLiberty about this soon...

@davincentjames - Vincent James

This is a supercut someone made from my podcast.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

How the “CIA killed Kennedy” narrative was completely fabricated by Israel through Mossad agents in Hollywood. https://t.co/rosNaGf9Ql

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the 1970s, conspiracy theories about the CIA's involvement in JFK's assassination were fueled by figures like Alan Weberman and Mark Lane. Israeli influence in steering these theories away from Israel was noted, with examples like Oliver Stone's film "JFK" produced by Arnon Milchan. The mainstream media's focus on the CIA and avoidance of Israeli connections were highlighted, despite evidence of Israeli involvement in spreading conspiracy theories. The Dallas Citizens Council, including Jewish businessmen, sponsored JFK's fatal trip to Dallas. These examples show a pattern of Jewish individuals benefiting from and promoting theories that deflect attention from Israel's potential role in JFK's assassination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The 19 seventies, the mainstream media and publishing houses again played a major role in steering conspiracy theorist toward the CIA trail while avoiding any hint of Israeli involvement. One major contributor to that effort was the Israeli American Alan Weberman, a close associate to Jewish Defense Organization, with his 1975 book, Coup D'etat in America, the CIA and the Assassination of John f Kennedy, coauthored by Michael Canfield. Weberman acknowledged Richard Perle's assistance in his investigation. This book contributed to the momentum that led the House Select Committee on Assassinations to reinvestigate in 1976 the murders of JFK and doctor Martin Luther King with a special focus on the CIA and organized crime. It is also in this context that Newsweek journalist Edward j Epstein published an interview of George de Mauryn Child, a Russian geologist and consultant for Texan oil man who had befriended Oswald and his Russian wife in Dallas in 1962. De Maurent Schild admitted that Oswald was introduced to him at the instigation of a CIA agent. The problem is that de Morantian was in no position to confirm or deny the words that Epstein ascribed to him. He was found dead a few hours after giving the interview. De Morantio's death was ruled a suicide. The sheriff's report mentions that in his last month, he complained that quote, the Jews and the Jewish mafia were out to get him. Needless to say, Eppuchtard didn't mention anything about this. We should also mention author Mark Lane, Levin by his real name. He was the first to incriminate the FBI and the CIA directly in his articles and then in a 1966 book, rush to judgment, which received considerable media coverage. Lane was adamant that the CIA was a culprit in his last book published in 2011, Last Word, My Indictment of the CIA in the Murder of JFK, that Israeli agents have been instrumental in spreading conspiracy theories targeting the CIA has become evident with Oliver Stone's film JFK released in 1991, starring Kevin Costner in the role of district attorney Jim Garrison. This film, which shoot public opinion to the point of motivating the president John f Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992, was produced by Arnon Milchan. Described in a 2011 biography as being from his youth, quote, one of the most important current agents that Israeli intelligence has ever fielded. Milchan was working in particular to boost Israel's nuclear program. In 2013, Milchan publicly revealed his extended activity as a secret agent of Israel. It is therefore no wonder that Stone's film gives no hint of the Mossad connection that Garrison had stumbled upon. All these examples demonstrate that the charges against the CIA have been the subject of considerable investment by others who are predominantly Jewish and benefited from an effective echo chamber in the mainstream press. The mainstream news and entertainment industry engaged in double dealing while ostensibly defending the official theory of the skeptic scrutiny towards the CIA. This is a typical strategy of Israel, occupying the ground of protest and creating a rigged debate excluding any reference to Israel. The contradiction of the official thesis is maintained focus on the CIA, the military industrial complex, or any other 100% American organization by an elite of militants whose primary motivation is the preservation of the interest of the Jewish community. JFK's trip to Dallas had no official character and was sponsored by a powerful business group known as the Dallas Citizens Council. Kennedy was on his way to the reception organized in his honor when he was shot. The Dallas Citizens Council was a powerful group dominated by Jewish businessmen like the wealthy Julius Sheps described by Brian Edward Stone in The Chosen Folks, Jews on the Frontiers of Texas as, quote, a member of every synagogue in the city and de facto leader of the Jewish community.
Saved - April 24, 2024 at 8:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Even films made by and starring black people are claimed to be part of a narrative spread by Jewish individuals. The same is said about the NAACP and the people involved in MLK's speeches and events, with claims that Stanley Levison wrote his speeches and the Rothschilds organized his events and started the NAACP.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Even when it's a film "for black people starring black people" it's actually just made by Jewish people spreading a narrative Jews want to spread. Kind of like the NAACP and the people behind MLK's speeches and events. https://x.com/IrishAmerican2/IrishAmerican27/status/1735728533073219873

@davincentjames - Vincent James

When it comes to who was behind MLK... Stanley Levison wrote his speeches and the Rothschilds organized his events. They also started the NAACP https://t.me/RealVincentJames/14850

Vincent James Nothing is yours. Nothing is ours. It’s all theirs to do with what they will. Who was really behind the NAACP and the civil rights movement? Context: https://t.me/RealVincentJames/14812 * https://rac.org/issues/civil-rights-voting-rights/brief-history-jews-and-civil-rights-movement-1960s Part 4 of thread: https://t.me/RealVincentJames/14854 t.me
Saved - April 23, 2024 at 11:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
There are claims that a Jewish NGO called the Lawyers Guild is infiltrating pro-Palestine protests and engaging in activities like doxxing and harassment. Some believe the group has ulterior motives and is present at various protests, including BLM and antifa demonstrations. The National Lawyers Guild has a history of supporting the Civil Rights Movement but has also been associated with extremist groups like the Weather Underground. The group's involvement in protests, such as the one at the Golden Gate Bridge and Columbia University, has raised questions about their liability.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Have you noticed the lime green hats at these pro-Palestine protests? These are plants put there by a Jewish NGO called the 'lawyers guild.' They only hire Jewish people for leadership and their volunteers up until now have had the job of doxxing & harassing right-wingers...

@Resist_05 - Pelham

Heroic students from Columbia University have gathered to protest against the fascist institution that suspended 15 students for being pro-Palestine supporters… RESIST 🔥🔥🔥

@davincentjames - Vincent James

I have had a run-in with these people before. I have seen them at several protests and two of them showed up right before a dozen leftist protesters in masks showed up to harass me personally at a non-political event.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

The group claims they are for the pro-Palestine protesters, but anyone with a brain understands they have other reasons why they are there. They're at every BLM and antifa protest and they bring meds to those who are jailed and help them get bailed out.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Its hilarious that leftists dont understand their entire ideology is controlled and manufactured by the very group they're protesting against... The same group replacing these university leaders, and the same group that controls all institutions and gov https://www.dailyveracity.com/2023/02/03/the-banned-truth-about-the-jewish-origins-of-modern-leftism/

@davincentjames - Vincent James

One of their (former?) presidents?

@davincentjames - Vincent James

During the 1960s and 1970s the National Lawyers Guild supported the Civil Rights Movement, and began focusing much of its work on protest support. A few of the organization’s members were affiliated with extremist groups like the Weather Underground.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Six members of the weather underground group were arrested in 1988 and charged with bombing the Capitol building. Susan Rosenberg was arrested and charged with having hundreds of pounds of explosives in her car. She recently served on the board of Black Lives Matter foundation. She was pardoned by Bill Clinton his last week in office.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

The adopted son of the founders of the group, Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn and biological son of two other members, Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert was just the recently recalled DA of San Francisco.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

In this thread we talk about communists like Carl Braden who bombed the home of a black American family and blamed it on whites. We also talk about Joseph Pogany (Schwartz) who's stated goal was to specifically target racial tension in the US. Here is a clip from a former member of the weather underground group who talks about how the group wanted to... https://t.me/RealVincentJames/15761

Video Transcript AI Summary
I recall attending a convention where the debate centered around whether it was a revolutionary duty to kill newborn white babies to prevent them from perpetuating oppression. One person questioned the morality of this idea, but was met with disapproval from the group.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Remember going to the last above ground weather, it was the weatherman or the weather, the weather underground, the last above ground convention. And, sitting in a room and the question that was debated, was was it was it was it or was it not the duty of every good revolutionary to kill all newborn white babies. And at that point, it seemed like a relevant framing of an issue. The logic being, hey, look, through no fault of their own, these white kids are gonna grow up to be part of an oppressive, racial establishment, internationally. And so really, you know, your duty is to kill newborn white babies. And I remember one guy kind of tentatively and apologetically suggesting that that seemed like it may be contradictory to the larger humanitarian aims of the movement and being kind of booed down.
Vincent James In this thread we talk about communists like Carl Braden who bombed the home of a black American family and blamed it on whites. We also talk about Joseph Pogany (Schwartz) who's stated goal was to specifically target racial tension in the US. Here is a clip from a former member of the weather underground group who talks about how the group wanted to "kill white babies." Part 12 of thread: https://t.me/RealVincentJames/15762 t.me

@davincentjames - Vincent James

During the McCarthy era, Guild members represented the Hollywood Ten, the Rosenbergs, and thousands of victims of what they called "anticommunist hysteria"

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Here is the Lawyers Guild in charge of the protest at the Golden Gate bridge. Controlled op at its finest https://t.co/tAlzqLVRM4

@hamill_law - Julie Hamill

At what point is the National Lawyers Guild held liable for these protests, which they promote and facilitate?

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Lawyers guild members at the columbia protest https://t.co/q8h1Gup1Eb

@ScooterCasterNY - Oliya Scootercaster 🛴

#NOW Police bring out protesters and National Lawyers guild in handcuffs, report that organizers have also been placed under arrest at the Columbia University Encampment for Palestine. Reports of at least 14 arrests at this time. Video by Olga Fe Desk@freedomnews.tv to license https://t.co/Z9eUR5f8Q5

Saved - April 22, 2024 at 8:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
They were allegedly behind various significant events and movements, including banning God from schools, Vatican II, the sexual revolution, racial movements, gender ideology, the Rosa Parks bus boycott, gay marriage, WWI and WWII, 9/11, the assassination of JFK, and the rise of Barack Obama. These claims are supported by various posts and references.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

I'll say it... 1. They were behind the SCOTUS cases banning God from schools, like Engel v Vitale being 2. They did Vatican II 3. They popularized the Scofield Bible 4. They made a mockery of Christian holidays through media 5. They were behind the sexual revolution...

@TheLaurenChen - Lauren Chen

I had a post blow up and go semi-viral, but I was also getting called out by some people in the replies. After considering things, it turns out they were right. Deleted the post, but here it is for reference.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

6. They are behind ALL of modern leftism Read this... https://www.dailyveracity.com/2023/02/03/the-banned-truth-about-the-jewish-origins-of-modern-leftism/

@davincentjames - Vincent James

7. They were behind the creation of the NAACP, Martin Luther King Jr, and all other racial movements https://rumble.com/v267a0w-the-forbidden-truth-about-mlk-who-were-the-puppeteers-behind-him-and-what-w.html

The Forbidden Truth About MLK: Who Were the Puppeteers Behind Him and What Were Their Goals? PLEASE SUPPORT OUR SHOW AND HELP US BUILD A STUDIO in 2023 ✅Support on our website: https://www.dailyveracity.com/support/ ✅CashApp: https://cash.app/$TheRedElephants 🔵₿itcoin: bc1qx7l4yfzle373q5rwr99 rumble.com

@davincentjames - Vincent James

8. They are behind the creation of gender ideology and gender transition... Read this: https://www.dailyveracity.com/2022/12/20/why-they-dont-want-you-to-know-what-types-of-books-the-nazis-burned/

@davincentjames - Vincent James

9. They were behind the planning of the Rosa Parks bus boycott https://t.co/hPdP2oN6qv

@davincentjames - Vincent James

10. They were behind gay marriage as well as changing Americans' attitudes about it through media... Look up the 'Will and Grace effect' https://t.co/KXvY0TKoUW

@davincentjames - Vincent James

11. They were behind WW1 through a secret deal between the Zionists and Britain, and then in turn caused WWII https://t.co/VrLJPBTssz

@davincentjames - Vincent James

If you'd like to know about the secret deal Zionists made with the West during WW1, and then again in WW2... Watch this right now. https://t.co/fTjpF7TIrX

Video Transcript AI Summary
During World War I, Germany had the upper hand and offered England a negotiated peace. However, the Zionists in Germany made a deal with the British war cabinet, promising to bring the United States into the war as an ally in exchange for Palestine. The United States, influenced by pro-German Jews, entered the war. After the war, the Balfour Declaration promised Palestine to the Zionists as a reward for their help. The Germans felt betrayed by the Jews, who they had treated well before. The Jews declared a boycott against Germany, leading to tensions. The speaker believes that the Jews were responsible for both World War I and II, and that Germany saw the war as a fight between Christianity and communism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Zionist and the co religionist rule this United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you say, well, that's the very broad statement to make, but let me show what happened while you were I don't wanna weigh that out. Let me show you what happened while we were all at sea. I'm including myself with you. We were all at sea. What happened? World War 1 broke out in the summer of 1914. 1914 was the year in which World War 1 broke out. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that law was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia, and on the other side by Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Turkey. What happened? Within 2 years, Germany had won that war. Not alone won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with 1 week food supply safety her, and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mute me. They lost 600,000 of the flower of the French youth in the defense of their gun on the sand. The Russian army was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home. They didn't wanna play war anymore. They didn't like bazaar, and the Italian army had collapsed. Now Germany, not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was Germany offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means let's call the war off and let everything be as it was before the war started. Well, England in the summer of 19 16 was considering that. Seriously, they had no choice. They was either accepting this negotiated seat that Germany was magnanimously offering them or going on with the war and being totally defeated. While that was going on, the Zionist in Germany, who represented the Zionist from Eastern Europe went to the British war cabinet, and I'm going to be brief because it's a long story. But I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make. If anyone here is curious or doesn't believe what I'm possible. The Zionist in London went to the British war cabinet, and they said, look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally. United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh. We were young. We were rich. We were powerful. And they told England, we will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally to fight with you on your side if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war. In other words, they made this deal. We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay up is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Turkey. Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionist for bringing the United States into the war. However, they made that promise in October of 1916. October 1916. And shortly after that I don't know how many of you remember it. The United States, which was almost totally pro German totally pro German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews. The bankers were Jews. All the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews, and they were pro Germaners because their people in a majority of cases came from Germany, and they wanted to see Germany. The Jews didn't like the czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. So the German bankers, the German Jews, and the other 6 banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of $1. They stood aside and they said, as long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one senate. But they poured money into Germany. They fought with Germany against Russia trying to make the czar's regime. Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, they went to England, and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like the traffic light that changes from red to green, where the newspapers had been all pro gerry pro German, where they've been telling the people the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects. All of a sudden, the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were hung. They were shooting Red Cross Nurses. They were cutting off baby's hands, and they were no good. Well, shortly after that, mister Wilson declared war on Germany. The Zionist in London sent these cables to the United States to justice Brandeis. Go to work on president Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work, and you go to work on president Wilson and get the United States into the war. And that did happen. That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it. We had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this rule. Now the war, World War 1, in which United States participated had absolutely no reason to be our war. We went in there. We were railroaded into it. If I can be vulgar, we were suffered into that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. Now that is something that the people in the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War 1. Now what happened? After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain, and they said, well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give up power clean after you win the war because they didn't know whether the war would last another year or another 10 years. So they started to work out a the receipt took the form of a letter, and it was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about, and that was called the Balfour Decoration. The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great powerful declaration that you hear so much about is just as phony as a $3 bill, and I don't think I can make it more emphatic than that. Now that is where all the trouble started. The United States within the war, United States crushed Germany. We went in there, and it's history. You know what happened. Now when the war was ended and the Germans went to Paris to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, there were a 117 Jews there at the delegation representing the Jews headed by Bernard Rook. I was there. I ought to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and passing out Europe to all the nations that claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, the Jews said, how about Palestine for us? And they produced for the first time to the knowledge of German, this power for decoration. So the German, for the first time, realized all that was the game. That's why United States came into the war. And the Germans, for the first time, realized that they were defeated. They suffered this terrific reparations that was blacked onto them because the Zionist wanted Palestine, and they were determined to get it at any point. Now, that brings us up to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally presented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had mister Rothenau there who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as Bernard Barouch in this country. You had mister Falyen who owns the 2 big steamship line, the North German Lloyd and the, Hamburg American line. Thank you. You had, mister who was the banker for the whole and foreign family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg who were the big merchants bankers, the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. Now the German felt well, that was quite a sellout. It was a sellout that I can best compare. Suppose United States was at war today with the Soviet Union, and we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union, well, it's quick. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing. And all of a sudden, Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union, and throwing them into the war brought about our defeat, a crushing defeat with a reparation, the likes of which man's imagination cannot encounter. Imagine then if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we thought they were loyal citizens working with us, was selling us out to the Soviet Union, and it was through them that great China was brought into the war against us. How would we deal in the United States against Chinese? I don't think one of them would dare show a face on any street. There wouldn't be lamppost enough convenient to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel. Well, that's how the Germans felt because we do. We've been so nice to them. And from 1905 on, when the first communist revolution in Russia failed and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany, and Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here, they sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than they wanted Palestine as a so called Jewish company. Now now buckle up all the great leaders, the big names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, they in 19 19, 1920, 21, 22, and 23, they wrote in all their papers, and the press was filled with their statement that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by our intersection and bringing the United States into the war against them. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca Cola or Minshna beer, there was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious beliefs. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shade and said, schmajer for a while or our father. No one cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing, that the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat for no reason at all because World War 1 was started against Germany for no reason for which they were responsible. They were guilty of nothing only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember, Germany, at the time of Napoleon, at the time of the French Revolution, what was the German right consisted of 300 300 small city, state, principalities, dukedoms, and so called 300 little separate political entities. And between that time, between the period of between Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years after that time, they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain. They were doing business all over the world. They could undersell anybody and make better sell anybody and make better products. And what happened? What happened is the result of that? There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia that we must track down Germany because there isn't one historian in the world that can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map for this thing. Now what happened after that? When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, They actually resented it, but not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers that the state department wrote in his book and quoted from a state department document written by, Hugo Schoenfeld, a Jew who called El Hall, sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so called Kansas political prisoners. He wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape. Everybody treated well, and they were filled with communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews because the Jews happened to be maybe 98% of the communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, ministers, labor leaders, nations, and others who had international affiliation. Now the Jews sort of tried to keep the lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany and that the Germans resented that. So they did take appropriate action against them. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same as we would the Chinese or the Negroes or the Catholics or anyone in this country that sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat. Now after a while, the Jews of the world didn't know what to do, so they called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews of every country in the world attended in July 1933. And they said to Germany, you fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a communist, no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are calling upon you and serving this other madam upon you. Well, the Germans told them, you can imagine. So what did they do? They broke up. And Samuel Hunter Meyer, if the name means anything, the people here. You wanna ask the question? Well, I don't want to go by what they were called. We're now using English words, and what they were called in Germany is not very material, but they were communist because in 1917, the communist took over Germany for a few days. Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of Jews in Germany took over the government for 3 days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war, he fled to Holland because he thought the communist were going to take over Germany as they did Russia, and that he was going to meet the same fate that the tsar did in Russia. So he left and went to Holland, for safety, for security. Now the, at that time, when the communist threat in Germany was quashed, it was quiet. The Jews were working still trying to get back into their former staff status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without turning their hair on anyone's hair. The same as one group, the, coal business, bought the people who are interested in liquor, and they didn't fight one another with fissile. They did it every way they could. Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 8 to 90,000,000 Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. Less than 1 half of 1 percent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet, they controlled all the press. They controlled most of the economy because they had come in and with cheap money, you know, the way the mark was devalued. They bought up practically everything. Well, in 1933, when Germany refused to surrender, mind you, to the World Conference of Jews in Amsterdam, they broke up and mister Undermeier came back to the United States who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, and he went from the steamer to ABC and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he said, the Jews of the world now declare a holy war against Germans. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans, and we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a worldwide boycott against them that will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business. And it is a fact that 2 thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported, their labor. So if Germany could not export, 2 thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There just was not enough food for more than 1 third of a population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, it was printed and paid a whole page in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, mister Sanger, untermyer, boldly stated that this economic boycott is our means of self defense. President Roosevelt has advocated this use in the NRA, which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless they followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, which, of course, is declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court at that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store, anywhere in the world with the word made in Germany on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth company told me that they had to dump 1,000,000 of dollars worth of property and dishes into the river, that their stores were boycotted. If anyone came in and found a dish marked made in Germany, they were ticketed with signs, Hitler, murderer, and so forth and, like, something like these sit ins that are taking place in the South. RH Macy, which is controlled by a family called Stroud who are also happened to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from pennies marked made in Germany. Well, they were cotton stockings. They may have been there 20 years because, since I've been observing women's legs in the last 20 years, I haven't seen a pair with cotton stockings on them. So Macy I saw Macy boycotted with hundreds of people walking around with signs, murderers, peopleites, and so forth. Now up to that time, not one heir of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering. There was no starvation. There was no murder. There was nothing. Now that naturally. The chairman said, why? Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work and our industries come to a sandstill, who are they to do that to us? And they naturally resented it. Certainly, they painted swastikas, stores owned by Jews. Why did the German go in and give their money to a storekeeper who is part of a boycott, who is going to starve Germany and to surrender into the Jews of the world, who are going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be. Well, it was ridiculous. That continued for some time, and it wasn't until 1938 when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shocked one of the officials that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found the men breaking windows and having street fights and so forth. Now for anyone to say that I don't like to use the word anti Semitism because it's meaningless, but means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible, number 1, for World War 1, number 2, for this worldwide boycott, and number 3 did I say for World War 1? They were responsible for the boycott and also for World War 2 because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided Europe is going to be Christian or communist. There is no in between.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

12. They were behind 9/11 https://t.co/0YfYPRmAtK

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Who did 9/11? https://t.co/n6WM1fYkVn

Video Transcript AI Summary
A Fox News report by Carl Cameron revealed concerns about Israeli spying in the US, including art students possibly involved in intelligence gathering. The report highlighted vulnerabilities in US telecommunications and wiretapping equipment. The story was initially taken down from the internet but later corroborated by documents worldwide. The issue of Israeli art students being deported for spying was also mentioned, with a call for court review of detention practices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Los Angeles, good morning. Speaker 1: Good morning. Brian, thank you for your network actually. Mister Wolf, I, back in December, Carl Cameron from Fox News ran a 4 part series that detailed, like a really a massive spying operation by Israel that was that was tapping all the phones in the United States and tapping all the secure lines of the FBI, the CIA, and the White House. Speaker 2: All the phones in the United States? Speaker 1: Yeah. Through through companies that that that Speaker 2: Imagine that transcription effort? Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, of course, it's done with keywords and all that in software. But the other thing was that all the secure lines at the White House and basically the entire federal government, they also said, and this was corroborated in a report released by the DEA, that there was a team of art students that were expelled. Actually, it was the largest spy related expulsion in American history that had teams of intelligence guys, Israeli intelligence guys on the same block. Speaker 2: And this this this was a Fox report? Speaker 1: A Fox report by Carl Cameron. It was them. And he they were the only ones that picked it up, although they were rats. Speaker 0: Is that good or bad? Do you do you believe the report? Speaker 1: Yeah. Oh, yeah. There definitely was a true report. The the local newspaper reports had it and others, but no no one on the air carried it except Fox News. And then, to make matters worse, Fox News, even on their web, you can go into December archives and look at the report. Or, actually, you can look at where the report was, Israeli spying or whatever. And they actually pulled it from the archives, and nobody followed up. Even now Speaker 2: this is a a conspiracy of silence, are you saying? Speaker 1: Well, if you go back to the archives, miss Wolfe, you'll see that you'll see that it's the only report pulled. The archives go back through, you know, like last year. Speaker 0: Okay. Thanks. Thanks for the call. Speaker 3: Next call for Bill Gertz comes from Newark, Delaware on our independent line. Good morning. Speaker 4: Good morning. Let's see. I was interested in the story that Carl Cameron broke. A 120 Israeli spies that were arrested in the United States shortly after the September incident. And some of the these people had been shadowing the, Speaker 5: terrorists Speaker 4: that that blew up the the buildings, living in the vicinity and, keeping up with them. On May 17th, 2 Israelis were arrested in Washington State in a van that had traces of high explosives. The I think it was 5 Israeli military spies as they you know, the way they described, were in a building in Brooklyn watching the the September bombing, and, all of this has been kept out of the press. And I just wonder I mean, this is good reading. This is what we wanna know about. You know, if Israel supposedly knew and there's stories that that that their intelligence agency told our government. Why isn't that the story? When did we know? What did they know? When did they let us know? Speaker 3: Are you familiar with this story? Speaker 0: Yes. Good questions. As for the 120, Israeli spies, that's a story that's out there. I've looked at that a a little bit. I really haven't found, really what's behind that story. What what is going on there is that there have been a number of Israelis, and, I've actually seen some people come to my house in in Maryland who are selling art, and they identify themselves as students. And there's there's something unusual about it. I have a feeling that this may be collection aspect to it, but I don't, see any kind of major effort to to figure out. I know that the US government has expelled some of these people. You mentioned the May 17th incident on the West Coast. I looked into this very carefully, And this was a story that, 2 Israeli nationals were stopped in a rental van near a military. I think it was a naval base in Washington State. And the initial reports were that they had somehow detected some explosives on the steering wheel. And obviously, that's a huge story. Well, I looked into it and, the word I got from federal officials was that it was a false indicator that there weren't really explosive traces there. Now, I don't know what to make of it. I'm not out there. If I were out there, perhaps I could, get a little bit closer to the story. But, the initial blush on that was that there wasn't anything to it. Speaker 3: Could you go back? You mentioned students selling art. What was the connection again to the Speaker 0: well, that somehow these Israeli art students have been spotted, around a number of places, including some federal buildings, and that has raised some counterintelligence concerns within the US government that perhaps the Israelis have been conducting some type of intelligence collection activities. I haven't really been able to get the all the facts of that story, but I've seen I think he was referring to Carl Cameron's story on Fox News, and he's he's done some good reporting on But I Speaker 5: one thing I I really wanna ask you, and I hope you bring it up when Carl Cameron comes on, is that there's a big controversy over a report he did for Fox, on 911. And where he implicated or he suggested, that it was in a 4 part series that that there were a bunch of Israeli art students that were, involved in espionage and may have, been following Al Qaeda, and there was concern that they were that they didn't report this incident to the, American authorities, and they were eventually left on visa violation. They're arrested about a 140 of them. Carl Cameron reported this. It was a big brouhaha, and it was, on Fox's website, and it was taken off of Fox's website. And it's been a big story in LeMonde. It's been a big story in the Humanae and, on big it's been reported in salon.com. And everywhere you turn and you see the story, the whole thing is always reported about Carl Cameron and his story. And with these oblique quotes about Carl Cameron, being puzzled by the strong reaction and everything. So please Speaker 4: ask, Speaker 5: and I tell you more more, you'll probably have more guests, ask Karl Cameron the same thing. Speaker 6: We've had a number of calls on that as well, and he'll be here in about, 35 minutes. Speaker 2: We'll bring Speaker 6: it up with him. Call, Silver Spring, Maryland, Republican line, Carl Cameron. Speaker 7: Yes. Yes. Good morning. I'd like to I'm actually, I'm calling to congratulate mister Cameron on his reporting. He he broke one of the most but the most important stories this year with the Israeli spy ring. Problem was that fax, Fox News pulled up the networks almost as soon as they reported it. And, I just like to ask mister Cameron how he felt about that and and how he feels in general, when, you know, news with potentially damaging or incriminating evident information against Israel is pulled off almost as soon as it's it's aired. Speaker 4: Thank you. Speaker 6: And we should point out, Carl, Cameron, that one of the first calls about an hour and 20 minutes ago dealt with this very issue. First of all, what is the caller talking about and what happened? Speaker 8: In December of last year, FOX did a 4 part series. I reported a 4 part series that described several scenarios, several dynamics, within the continental United States. There's a report that was circulated that has now been disclosed by the DEA that reported that over the course of a year and a half, numerous federal agencies had encountered, individuals who refer to themselves as Israeli art students, essentially visiting these facilities, military installations, FBI, DEA, INS, both the publicly listed addresses as well as some that are not made public, and those particular facilities are intended to be kept, secret. And they began to ask questions and attempt to sell their art. And we reported that this was a dynamic that had been described by government documents as a intelligence gathering operation. Following that particular story, we then described the US intelligence community's grave concerns that our civilian telecommunications, are compromised and vulnerable to, intelligence gathering because many of the companies that provide services in our telephone calling are are owned by or closely aligned with Israel and that they have been occasionally investigated by our federal government for tapping or taking information from our telecommunications for the purposes of intelligence. And finally, that there is a concern in our government that the way in which we actually conduct wiretapping, under law enforcement granted judge judge approved surveillance subpoenas, is also potentially vulnerable to compromise and intercept. Excuse me, again, because some of the companies involved with the manufacturing of that equipment are Israeli and that they've never been tested for vulnerabilities. And that too has been investigated as a potential threat. Potential and investigation are the important things to to remember. There is no claim by anybody in our government that the government of Israel or anybody in Israel is actually spying, that these are mysteries, that there is evidence to suggest a problem, and they've yet to been able to solve it. Speaker 6: Did anyone tell you to kill the story? Speaker 8: No. As a matter of fact, what happened was we did put the transcripts of my story on the Internet. And after a period of several days, it was taken down off the Internet, as what I've been told was merely to make available for a huge deluge of war related material. You gotta remember this was December, so we were still very much in the throes of the September 11th aftermath. And there was, war underway in Afghanistan, and they had to make way for other news. And we've done some follow-up reporting on it. And there is, there has since since our story, which was which was denounced by the pro Israel lobby in this country as anti Semitic and biased and and inaccurate, much of what we've reported has now been reported all over the world because the documents that I used and was careful to protect because some of it was considered classified in secret at the time, have now appeared virtually all over the world corroborating our story and what we reported. Speaker 9: Well, I agree that, talk should continue. Creation of a Palestinian state after the violence has stopped is a laudable goal. I I certainly hope that the Cheney visit is a productive visit. I think the moderate Arab states have to be working closely with us to find both a way to stop the violence and, an end game that makes sense for everyone in the region, which includes the survival and security and, respect for the state of Israel, which I think is absolutely essential to an essential goal of US foreign policy and one I strongly support. Speaker 3: And Robert Simpson emails, could you ask representative Harmon about the deportation of Israeli art students spying in the US and should this worry us? Are you familiar with this issue? Speaker 9: Israeli arts I'm I'm certainly familiar with the fact that we have been rounding up, people on student visas and considering whether they might have had anything to do with terrorism. And some of those rounded up are Israelis. But I don't know the specific facts. I would not like to comment except to say that I am not in favor of unlimited detention. I voted for the Patriot Act, which passed the Congress, which put limits on detention. And I think there ought to be court review after 7 days or an appropriate period of time about why it is that we're holding people. And roundups are not things that I think

@davincentjames - Vincent James

13. Yes, they were behind 9/11 https://t.co/ApALdHz7Gb

@Canadiancliped - Canadian Clip

Nick Fuentes exposes the biggest Red-Pill: The Clean Break Report 🇮🇱 https://t.co/LnG8YTRNx1

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1996, the Clean Break Report, commissioned by the Israeli government, outlined plans to secure Israel's borders by targeting Iraq, Syria, and Iran. Authors Douglas Faith, David Wormser, and Richard Perle proposed these actions. By 2000, all three authors were working for George W. Bush. After 9/11, the events unfolded as planned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That benefit. Israel. And here's the biggest red pill. This is all you need to know about 911. Everybody can Google the clean break report. Clean Break Report 1996. 3 or 4 authors get together, Douglas Faith, David Wormser, Richard Perle. These guys all get together working for the Israeli government in 1996. This is a report commissioned by the Israeli government, and this is what they say. They say, hey, mister prime minister of Israel, these are the three things you need to do to secure the northern border of Israel. We need to destroy Iraq, we need to destabilize Syria, and then we need to destroy Iran. This was commissioned by the Israeli government for the Israeli government. These 3 guys said, this is what we gotta do. Iraq, Syria, Iran. We gotta take them all out. In the year 2000, George w Bush gets elected. All 3 of those guys go to work for George Bush. 911 happens. What happens next?

@davincentjames - Vincent James

14. No seriously, they were behind 9/11 https://t.co/SmspOjILyw

@davincentjames - Vincent James

What is PNAC? What is the Clean Break Memo? Who Did 9/11? https://t.co/P0h2LvdT0q

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the possibility of 9/11 being an inside job, pointing to evidence from think tanks like PNAC and IASPS advocating regime change in the Middle East. It mentions key figures like Donald Rumsfeld and John Bolton, as well as Israeli spying allegations. The speaker urges viewers to explore further and remember the lives lost on that tragic day.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everyone in the world has heard of 911. Everyone in America knows the phrase, never forget. Everyone old enough remembers where they were that day, but very few have been shown some of the things I will present to you in this video. Some of you may have heard the term 911 was an inside job, And some of you may believe it and some of you may not. Some of you though may have considered this a possibility but just assumed it would never be proven. But what if I were to tell you that there is undeniable information that points towards this being true? What if I told you that there is overwhelming evidence that multiple groups were involved in carrying out this attack with the help of government representatives and people from a country we call our ally? To show you exactly what I mean and who I believe the architects of this catastrophic tragedy were, you have to go back to a think tank that was formed in 1990 7, just before the 2,001 attacks and a memo that was written in 1996. The think tank was called the project for a new American century, also known as PNAC. The infamous memo was known as the clean break memo and was written in 1996 just months prior to the formation of the PNAC think tank by another think tank called the Institute For Advanced Strategic and Political Studies. Now, let's start with the clean break memo. This was a foreign policy document Institute For Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, also known as IASPS. This group was led by Richard Perle. The memo was written in attention to Benjamin Netanyahu, then and current Prime Minister of Israel. The report talked about how to solve Israel's security problems in the Middle East with an emphasis on Western values by removing leaders from power and installing puppets into new regimes. The memo advocated an aggressive new policy including the removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and the overthrow of Syria by engaging in proxy warfare and highlighting its alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction. Many critics say that this document led to the deaths of thousands upon thousands of American soldiers. Speaker 1: Once Saddam has nuclear weapons, the terror network will have nuclear weapons. Next thing you'll see is a nuclear bomb in the World Trade Center. If you take out Saddam, Saddam's regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region. Speech was, I think a thorough, and powerful indictment of, Saddam's attempts to conceal and deceive, the world, to conceal the efforts that he's making at producing weapons of mass destruction. We in Israel have known this for a long time. We've shared this intelligence with the United States, and I think that the United States has shared, some of that today, in of its own intelligence with the world. Speaker 0: According to the preamble in the memo, it was centered around a new Israeli strategy. Former United States assistant secretary of defense, Bridget Pearl was the study group leader, but the final reports included ideas from Douglas Fife and IASPS president Robert Lowenberg. For the sake of keeping this video short, I'll let you read the clean break memo on your own for yourselves. However, throughout the entire memo, it suggested overthrowing and destabilizing several Middle Eastern countries and called for preemptive strikes on Palestine along with quote, hot pursuit into Palestinian controlled areas, a justifiable practice with which Americans will sympathize. Douglas Fife later came under fire after the Iraq war when he was accused of doctoring information and being one of the architects of the war that killed many thousands of our sons, brothers, fathers, and children. Speaker 2: Fife is a bureaucratic bully hell bent on war. The most frequent and damaging charge has been that Fife used his Pentagon office to produce alternative intelligence reports that link Saddam to Al Qaeda, then pass them on to the White House. Some of it, like the report that 911 hijacker Mohammed Ada met with Iraqi intelligence in Prague, has been widely discredited. An investigation by the Pentagon's inspector general called FICE activities inappropriate, but not illegal or unauthorized. This was a rebuke. You agree? Speaker 3: Yes. And I and I think it was an unfounded rebuke, an unfounded rebuke. Speaker 2: Are you happy with the way things have played out in Iraq? Speaker 3: No. I don't think anybody can be happy. We we've we've had terrible losses. We have the the Americans who've lost their lives and and Iraqis who've lost their lives, our coalition partners. It's been, you know, a costly war. Speaker 2: Do you still think this was the right thing to do knowing now what you know? Speaker 3: I I think the president made the right decision given what he knew and given what we all knew. And to tell you the truth, even given what we've learned since. Speaker 0: The project for a new American century, the other think tank formed months after IASPS was founded and directed by some of the same architects of the war and the same members of the IASPS including Bill Kristol, a man who currently never waste a chance on Twitter to attack Trump on things like immigration and trade while also cheering on the indictment of Trump, Robert Kagan, Randy Schoeman and Donald Rumsfeld. Donald Rumsfeld for instance was named once by General Wesley Clark who spilled the beans on the plan for regime change and war in all of the pre planned countries. Here is what the general had to say. Speaker 4: About 10 days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw secretary Rumsfeld and and deputy secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the joint staff who used used to work for me. And one of the generals called me and he said, sir, you gotta come in you gotta come in and talk to me a second. I said, well, you're too busy. He said, no. No. He says, we've made the decision. We're going to war with Iraq. This was on or about 20th September. I said, we're going to war with Iraq. Why? He said, I don't know. He said, I guess they don't know what else to do. So, I said, well, did they find some information collect connecting Saddam to Al Qaeda? He said, no. No. It's just there's nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq. He said, I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists, but we got a good military and we can take down governments. And, he said, I guess if the only do you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail. So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan, I said, are we still going to war with Iraq? And he said, oh, it's worse than that. He said he reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. He said, I just he said, I just got this down from upstairs, me and the secretary of defense office today. And he said, this is a memo that describes how we're gonna take out 7 countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran. Speaker 0: Other notable signatories and members were Jeb Bush, Dick Cheney, Elliot Cohen, Aaron Friedberg, Stephen Rosen, Paul Wolfowitz, and of course, John Bolton, a psychopathic warmonger who has called for the bombing of Iran, North Korea, and the overthrow of Syria on several occasions. Of the 25 people who signed PNAC's founding statement of principles, 10 went on to serve in the administration of US president George w Bush, including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, John Bolton, and Paul Wolfowitz. Observers such as Erwin Stelzer and Dave Grodin have suggested that the p neck played a key role in shaping the foreign policy of the Bush administration particularly in building support for the Iraq war. Under the Clinton administration before George Bush, Krystel and Kagan advocated regime change in Iraq throughout the Iraqi disarmament process. And shortly after this, Richard Pearl, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliot Abrams, Donald Rumsfeld, Robert Zolick, and John Bolton penned an open letter initiated by PNAC to president Bill Clinton calling for the complete removal of Saddam Hussein, Believing that UN sanctions against Iraq would be an ineffective means of disarming Iraq, PNAC members also wrote a letter to congress urging them to support the Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998, which president Clinton signed into law in October of 1998. The Iraqi Liberation Act, while having an innocent humanitarian sounding name, was just a policy stating that the US should remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Now, once again, remember this was all before September 11, 2001. But the famous and most important publication time had been a time of peace and stability. But no moment in international politics can be frozen in time. Even a global Pax Americana will not preserve itself. Meaning, we cannot have global peace forever. The document also established 4 core missions for US military forces. Number 1, the defense of the American homeland. Number 2, the fighting and winning of multiple simultaneous major theater wars. Number 3, the performance of duties associated with shaping the security environment in key regions. And number 4, the transformation of US forces to exploit the revolution in military affairs. The most cited and most extremely controversial section of rebuilding America's defenses was entitled creating tomorrow's dominant force. Written before the September 11th attacks, this section stated, further, the process of this transformation even if it brings a revolutionary change is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor. Now what could they mean by this? What on earth could they mean by needing a catastrophic and catalyzing event? Speaker 5: It has been more than 16 years since a civilian working for the navy was charged with passing secrets to Israel. Jonathan Pollard plead guilty to conspiracy to commit espionage and is serving a life sentence. At first, Israeli leaders claimed Pollard was part of a rogue operation, but later took responsibility for his work. Now Fox News has learned some US investigators believe that there are Israelis again very much engaged in spying in and on the US who may have known things they didn't tell us before September 11th. Fox News correspondent Carl Cameron has details in the first of a 4 part series. Speaker 6: Since September 11th, more than 60 Israelis have been arrested or detained either under the new Patriot Anti terrorism Law or for immigration violations. A handful of active Israeli military were among those detained according to investigators, who say some of the detainees also failed polygraph questions when asked about alleged surveillance activities against and in the United States. There is no indication that the Israelis were involved in the 911 attacks, but investigators suspect that the Israelis may have gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance and not shared it. A highly placed investigator said there are, quote, tie ins. But when asked for details, he flatly refused describe them saying, quote, evidence linking these Israelis to 911 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information. Speaker 3: You saw what happened? How you heard what happened? Yeah. You think that was, like, it was covered. Sounded like it right Holy shit, man. No. Get the other building. That's terrorists. Other building? That's terrorists, bro. That's fucking terrorists. Holy shit. God. That's terrorists. They just sent out. Did you get that? I I I zoomed out on it. Oh. The only people are dead? You know how many people are dead? The only people who are dead? Speaker 0: Now the project for New American Century ceased to function in 2006. It was replaced by a new think tank named the foreign policy initiative cofounded again by Bill, Kristol and Kagan in 2009. The Foreign Policy Initiative was dissolved in 2017 when Republican hedge fund billionaire, Paul Singer, stopped funding the think tank because he said he was critical of President Trump during his presidential campaign saying his trade policies were guaranteed to cause a global depression, a widespread global depression. He said the organization was set up to really accomplish two main things which was to basically try to keep the republican party focused on Iraq and Afghanistan. That mission is no longer relevant. From the massive insurance policy that Larry Silverstein took out in the trade center right before the attacks, to none of his family members or himself showing up for work that day, to the recording of Silverstein telling someone to demolish building 7, to the 5 dancing facade agents seen celebrating while filming the attack who were later arrested. There is much, much, much more to the truth behind this tragic day that I encourage you to follow within the documentaries linked in the description. I will leave it up to all of you to decide if this information is significant or if it can be brushed off as a coincidental conspiracy. But for now, let's remember this day, mourn the lives lost and never ever ever forget.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

15. They were behind the assassination of JFK... https://t.co/FdwUho6BAg

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Everything you need to know about who was really behind the assassination of JFK in one TikTok edit. This edit goes so hard. Who made this? https://t.co/IO1Rt3erd0

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Kennedy assassination is linked to Israel and the messiah. Israel's prime minister believed nuclear weapons were crucial for survival. Kennedy sought neutral scientists to inspect Israel's reactor, but they were deceived. Jewish community members in Dallas, including Abraham Zapruder, were connected to the assassination. The building where shots were fired was linked to Anti-Defamation League financiers. Jack Ruby, originally Jakob Rubinstein, killed Oswald. Israel's reactor went critical after Kennedy's death, leading to the acquisition of nuclear weapons shortly after.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can't talk about the Kennedy assassination without talking about Israel, without talking about the messiah. They're the main people involved. They're that's the main group involved. The prime minister of Israel at the time said that without nuclear weapons, Israel would not survive. Kennedy was asking and asking and asking for neutral scientists to observe the reactor. They continue to push for this with CIA director McCone and finally was granted access. Israel, prior to the visit, set up a fake control room with fake control panels, and part of the agreement was that the inspectors were never going to be able to inspect the actual reactor. After that visit, Kennedy was quoted in saying, those sons of bitches lie to me constantly about their nuclear capability. The Jewish community invites JFK to come to Dallas, which was sponsored by the Dallas Citizens Council, which was directed by Julia Scheps who was a member of the local organization. The ADL once again, a confirmed member of the local binai rip as well. Abraham Zapruder was also just so happened to be the guy that caused the assassination on film. Zapruder was also a manufacturer headquartered in the Dallas textiles building. According to ballistic studies, it was from that building the first two shots were fired and missed. The building was owned by David Weisblatt, one of the biggest financiers of the Anti Defamation League, and Douglas Jaffe, one of the biggest donors to Lyndon c Johnson. The host committee that invited Kennedy to the event in Dallas was chaired by a guy named Sam Bloom. According to Dallas police, it was Bloom who pushed the hardest for the police to transfer Lee Harvey Oswald from the Dallas police station to the Dallas County Jail. Now it was during that transfer that Jack Ruby shot Oswald. What was Jack Ruby's real last name? Jakob Rubinstein. The reactor went critical right after Kennedy died, and they got the bomb a year or 2 later. That's kind of a coincidence, isn't it? That's kind of a strange coincidence. Kennedy dies? Israel gets the bomb. He gets the bump.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

16. They were behind Brack Obama https://t.co/7wl3O1W8Gw

@davincentjames - Vincent James

“And you know who got him started in politics… it was the two leading J-wish families of Chicago” https://t.co/QqItRjeZjy

Video Transcript AI Summary
Barack Obama has long supported Israel, even before his time in the senate. His political career was influenced by two prominent Jewish families in Chicago.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Barack Obama has been a supporter and a believer in Israel from before he was in the senate. You can look it up and see the record. And you know who got him started in politics? Not in the presidential. Let's everyone, as I said, says the right thing. But before that, it was the 2 leading Jewish families of of of Chicago.
Saved - March 2, 2024 at 10:30 PM

@davincentjames - Vincent James

If you'd like to know about the secret deal Zionists made with the West during WW1, and then again in WW2... Watch this right now. https://t.co/fTjpF7TIrX

Video Transcript AI Summary
During World War I, Germany offered England a negotiated peace, but the Zionists in Germany went to the British war cabinet and promised to bring the United States into the war as an ally if they were given Palestine after the war. England agreed and made the Balfour Declaration, promising Palestine to the Zionists. After Germany's defeat, the Jews were blamed for their loss and faced discrimination. In 1933, the Jews declared a worldwide boycott against Germany, leading to tensions. The situation escalated, and Germany and the Jews ended up in a war to determine their survival. The Germans believed Europe had to be either Christian or communist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Zionist and the co religionist rule this United States as though they were the absolute monarchs of this country. Now you say, well, that's the very broad statement to make, but let me show what happened while you were I don't wanna weigh that out. Let me show you what happened while we were all at sea. I'm including myself with you. We were all at sea. What happened? World War 1 broke out in the summer of 1914. 1914 was the year in which World War 1 broke out. There are few people here my age who remember that. Now that law was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and Russia, and on the other side by Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Turkey. What happened? Within 2 years, Germany had won that war. Not alone won it nominally, but won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean, and Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, stood there with 1 week food supply safety her, and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mute me. They lost 600,000 of the flower of the French youth in the defense of their gun on the sand. The Russian army was defecting. They were picking up their toys and going home. They didn't wanna play war anymore. They didn't like bazaar, and the Italian army had collapsed. Now Germany, not a shot had been fired on the German soil. Not an enemy soldier had crossed the border into Germany. And yet, here was Germany offering England peace terms. They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means let's call the war off and let everything be as it was before the war started. Well, England in the summer of 19 16 was considering that. Seriously, they had no choice. They was either accepting this negotiated seat that Germany was magnanimously offering them or going on with the war and being totally defeated. While that was going on, the Zionist in Germany, who represented the Zionist from Eastern Europe went to the British war cabinet, and I'm going to be brief because it's a long story. But I have all the documents to prove any statement that I make. If anyone here is curious or doesn't believe what I'm possible. The Zionist in London went to the British war cabinet, and they said, look here. You can yet win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the United States will come in as your ally. United States was not in the war at that time. We were fresh. We were young. We were rich. We were powerful. And they told England, we will guarantee to bring the United States into the war as your ally to fight with you on your side if you will promise us Palestine after you win the war. In other words, they made this deal. We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price you must pay up is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, Austria, Hungary, and Turkey. Now England had as much right to promise Palestine to anybody as the United States would have to promise Japan to Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great Britain that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the Zionist for bringing the United States into the war. However, they made that promise in October of 1916. October 1916. And shortly after that I don't know how many of you remember it. The United States, which was almost totally pro German totally pro German because the newspapers here were controlled by Jews. The bankers were Jews. All the media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews, and they were pro Germaners because their people in a majority of cases came from Germany, and they wanted to see Germany. The Jews didn't like the czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. So the German bankers, the German Jews, and the other 6 banking firms in the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of $1. They stood aside and they said, as long as France and England are tied up with Russia, not one senate. But they poured money into Germany. They fought with Germany against Russia trying to make the czar's regime. Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, they went to England, and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, like the traffic light that changes from red to green, where the newspapers had been all pro gerry pro German, where they've been telling the people the difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially and in other respects. All of a sudden, the Germans were no good. They were villains. They were hung. They were shooting Red Cross Nurses. They were cutting off baby's hands, and they were no good. Well, shortly after that, mister Wilson declared war on Germany. The Zionist in London sent these cables to the United States to justice Brandeis. Go to work on president Wilson. We're getting from England what we want. Now you go to work, and you go to work on president Wilson and get the United States into the war. And that did happen. That's how the United States got into the war. We had no more interest in it. We had no more right to be in it than we have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this rule. Now the war, World War 1, in which United States participated had absolutely no reason to be our war. We went in there. We were railroaded into it. If I can be vulgar, we were suffered into that war merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. Now that is something that the people in the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into World War 1. Now what happened? After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain, and they said, well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give up power clean after you win the war because they didn't know whether the war would last another year or another 10 years. So they started to work out a the receipt took the form of a letter, and it was worded in very cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about, and that was called the Balfour Decoration. The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great powerful declaration that you hear so much about is just as phony as a $3 bill, and I don't think I can make it more emphatic than that. Now that is where all the trouble started. The United States within the war, United States crushed Germany. We went in there, and it's history. You know what happened. Now when the war was ended and the Germans went to Paris to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, there were a 117 Jews there at the delegation representing the Jews headed by Bernard Rook. I was there. I ought to know. Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and passing out Europe to all the nations that claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, the Jews said, how about Palestine for us? And they produced for the first time to the knowledge of German, this power for decoration. So the German, for the first time, realized all that was the game. That's why United States came into the war. And the Germans, for the first time, realized that they were defeated. They suffered this terrific reparations that was blacked onto them because the Zionist wanted Palestine, and they were determined to get it at any point. Now, that brings us up to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they naturally presented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You had mister Rothenau there who was maybe 100 times as important in industry and finance as Bernard Barouch in this country. You had mister Falyen who owns the 2 big steamship line, the North German Lloyd and the, Hamburg American line. Thank you. You had, mister who was the banker for the whole and foreign family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg who were the big merchants bankers, the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. Now the German felt well, that was quite a sellout. It was a sellout that I can best compare. Suppose United States was at war today with the Soviet Union, and we were winning. And we told the Soviet Union, well, it's quick. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing. And all of a sudden, Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union, and throwing them into the war brought about our defeat, a crushing defeat with a reparation, the likes of which man's imagination cannot encounter. Imagine then if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese citizens, who all the time we thought they were loyal citizens working with us, was selling us out to the Soviet Union, and it was through them that great China was brought into the war against us. How would we deal in the United States against Chinese? I don't think one of them would dare show a face on any street. There wouldn't be lamppost enough convenient to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel. Well, that's how the Germans felt because we do. We've been so nice to them. And from 1905 on, when the first communist revolution in Russia failed and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany, and Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here, they sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than they wanted Palestine as a so called Jewish company. Now now buckle up all the great leaders, the big names that you read about in connection with Zionism today, they in 19 19, 1920, 21, 22, and 23, they wrote in all their papers, and the press was filled with their statement that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought about by our intersection and bringing the United States into the war against them. The Jews themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca Cola or Minshna beer, there was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious beliefs. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shade and said, schmajer for a while or our father. No one cared in Germany any more than they do in the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing, that the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat for no reason at all because World War 1 was started against Germany for no reason for which they were responsible. They were guilty of nothing only of being successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must remember, Germany, at the time of Napoleon, at the time of the French Revolution, what was the German right consisted of 300 300 small city, state, principalities, dukedoms, and so called 300 little separate political entities. And between that time, between the period of between Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years after that time, they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivaling Great Britain. They were doing business all over the world. They could undersell anybody and make better sell anybody and make better products. And what happened? What happened is the result of that? There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia that we must track down Germany because there isn't one historian in the world that can find a valid reason why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map for this thing. Now what happened after that? When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, They actually resented it, but not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers that the state department wrote in his book and quoted from a state department document written by, Hugo Schoenfeld, a Jew who called El Hall, sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so called Kansas political prisoners. He wrote back that he found them in very fine condition. They were in excellent shape. Everybody treated well, and they were filled with communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews because the Jews happened to be maybe 98% of the communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, ministers, labor leaders, nations, and others who had international affiliation. Now the Jews sort of tried to keep the lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand that they had sold out Germany and that the Germans resented that. So they did take appropriate action against them. They, shall I say, discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same as we would the Chinese or the Negroes or the Catholics or anyone in this country that sold us out to an enemy and brought about our defeat. Now after a while, the Jews of the world didn't know what to do, so they called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews of every country in the world attended in July 1933. And they said to Germany, you fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was a communist, no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are calling upon you and serving this other madam upon you. Well, the Germans told them, you can imagine. So what did they do? They broke up. And Samuel Hunter Meyer, if the name means anything, the people here. You wanna ask the question? Well, I don't want to go by what they were called. We're now using English words, and what they were called in Germany is not very material, but they were communist because in 1917, the communist took over Germany for a few days. Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of Jews in Germany took over the government for 3 days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war, he fled to Holland because he thought the communist were going to take over Germany as they did Russia, and that he was going to meet the same fate that the tsar did in Russia. So he left and went to Holland, for safety, for security. Now the, at that time, when the communist threat in Germany was quashed, it was quiet. The Jews were working still trying to get back into their former staff status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without turning their hair on anyone's hair. The same as one group, the, coal business, bought the people who are interested in liquor, and they didn't fight one another with fissile. They did it every way they could. Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 8 to 90,000,000 Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. Less than 1 half of 1 percent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet, they controlled all the press. They controlled most of the economy because they had come in and with cheap money, you know, the way the mark was devalued. They bought up practically everything. Well, in 1933, when Germany refused to surrender, mind you, to the World Conference of Jews in Amsterdam, they broke up and mister Undermeier came back to the United States who was the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole conference, and he went from the steamer to ABC and made a radio broadcast throughout the United States in which he said, the Jews of the world now declare a holy war against Germans. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict against the Germans, and we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a worldwide boycott against them that will destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business. And it is a fact that 2 thirds of Germany's food supply had to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported, their labor. So if Germany could not export, 2 thirds of Germany's population would have to starve. There just was not enough food for more than 1 third of a population. Now in this declaration, which I have here, it was printed and paid a whole page in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, mister Sanger, untermyer, boldly stated that this economic boycott is our means of self defense. President Roosevelt has advocated this use in the NRA, which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted unless they followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, which, of course, is declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court at that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store, anywhere in the world with the word made in Germany on it. In fact, an executive of the Woolworth company told me that they had to dump 1,000,000 of dollars worth of property and dishes into the river, that their stores were boycotted. If anyone came in and found a dish marked made in Germany, they were ticketed with signs, Hitler, murderer, and so forth and, like, something like these sit ins that are taking place in the South. RH Macy, which is controlled by a family called Stroud who are also happened to be Jews, a woman found stockings there which came from pennies marked made in Germany. Well, they were cotton stockings. They may have been there 20 years because, since I've been observing women's legs in the last 20 years, I haven't seen a pair with cotton stockings on them. So Macy I saw Macy boycotted with hundreds of people walking around with signs, murderers, peopleites, and so forth. Now up to that time, not one heir of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no suffering. There was no starvation. There was no murder. There was nothing. Now that naturally. The chairman said, why? Who are these people to declare a boycott against us and throw all our people out of work and our industries come to a sandstill, who are they to do that to us? And they naturally resented it. Certainly, they painted swastikas, stores owned by Jews. Why did the German go in and give their money to a storekeeper who is part of a boycott, who is going to starve Germany and to surrender into the Jews of the world, who are going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to be. Well, it was ridiculous. That continued for some time, and it wasn't until 1938 when a young Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shocked one of the officials that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found the men breaking windows and having street fights and so forth. Now for anyone to say that I don't like to use the word anti Semitism because it's meaningless, but means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible, number 1, for World War 1, number 2, for this worldwide boycott, and number 3 did I say for World War 1? They were responsible for the boycott and also for World War 2 because after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided Europe is going to be Christian or communist. There is no in between.

@DrLoupis - Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis

In the memory of evil globalist Jacob Rothschild who caused so much misery to the world, let’s all remember how “his family created Israel” Israel is a fake state created by evil globalists.🇮🇱 https://t.co/sGj3M8aezG

Video Transcript AI Summary
In modern Jewish history, the Balfour Declaration was addressed to Lord Rothschild, expressing support for a Jewish national home in Palestine while protecting the rights of non-Jewish communities. The speaker reflects on the significance of this moment, calling it an extraordinary event that took 3000 years to achieve. They credit Chaim Weizmann's charm and persuasion for influencing key British figures. Despite the letter's compromises, it remains a pivotal moment in Jewish history.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In modern Jewish history, and it begins with 3 words. Dear lord Rothschild. Speaker 1: Dear lord Rothchild, I have much pleasure in conveying to you on behalf of his majesty's government the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations, which has been submitted to and approved by the cabinet. Speaker 0: Why was it that this letter was sent by the foreign secretary to your great uncle Walter? Speaker 2: It's an interesting question because it was primarily a movement from Eastern Europe, but they didn't clarify who was in charge of that movement. And in addition, it was, after all, in Great Britain. So they felt that the Rothschild family should be the one to whom it was addressed. And Walter was Lord Rothschild, and he was, a Zionist. And, those really are the background reasons. Speaker 0: So Walter received the Balfour Declaration, and I have a copy here. And I wonder if I could possibly ask you to read it for us. Speaker 2: Yes. Indeed. Yep. I'm going to put on the spectacles to make sure I'm reading accurately. His majesty's government view with favour the establishment of Palestine as a national home for the Jewish people and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object. It being clearly understood that nothing should be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country. I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation, yours, Arthur Balfour. Speaker 0: And here it is, the Balfour Declaration. What do you feel when you when you see it here? Speaker 2: I've genuinely felt it's one of the most extraordinary moments in the history of the Jewish people. If you think it took 3000 years, to get to this. And then you say, how did this miracle happen? It's the most incredible piece of opportunism. I mean, if you think you had an impoverished, would be scientist, high invites when who somehow gets to England, meets a few people, including those of my family, seduces them. He has such great charm and conviction. He gets to Balfour and he unbelievably persuades Balfour and Lloyd George, the prime minister, and most of the ministers that this idea of, the national home for, Jews should be allowed to take place. I mean, it's so so unlikely. Speaker 0: It it Speaker 2: And then he's, you know, starts to fight a difficult battle with the British cabinet and this, letter goes through 5 drafts as you know. And in the end, it comes out as a rather compromising letter. I mean, the essential point is there for, the Jewish community to fasten on to. You have the first bit which promises a national home rather than the national home, And then you have the bit that nothing that's to be done should, in any way, harm the Arab community. But you come back to the big point, which is that this is perhaps the greatest event in Jewish life for 1000 of years. And
Saved - December 29, 2023 at 8:56 AM

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Did you know that the Mossad bombed the Israeli embassy in London and then framed a Palestinian group? Also look into: The bombing of the King David Hotel The Lavon Affair Barracks Bombing The Irgun https://t.co/xyU9nxlgBj

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1994, a car bomb exploded outside the Israeli embassy in London, causing minor injuries but no deaths. The bomb was designed to destroy evidence and was believed to be the work of a skilled individual. A senior MI5 officer, who had access to both evidence and intelligence, concluded that Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, had orchestrated the attack themselves. The officer believed Mossad did this to pressure MI5 into increasing security around their embassy. Additionally, two innocent Palestinians involved in political campaigning were arrested, charged, and convicted for the attack, which effectively dismantled their network. This theory, although it may sound like a conspiracy, was the official position of MI5 at the time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Flag attack in London in 1994, where a car bomb exploded outside the Israeli embassy in the center of London. Yeah. Anyone hurt or killed? I don't remember. Very minor injuries. That was all. Nobody was killed. And, it was Scattered device, it appeared to eat itself, eat all the forensics. Now this is very, very rare, so it looked like it, you know, sort of fairly technical person had put that together. But what emerged from that, the senior MI five officer who was in charge of the investigation into it, and had seen all the evidence, but also all the intelligence, which is necessarily admissible in court, wrote his formal assessment at the end of the case. And he said he reckoned that Mossad, the Israeli External intelligence agency had bombed their own embassy, sort of extra controlled explosion outside the embassy. And as I said, that was a senior Mi 5 officer. That was his formal verdict. If you read that on the Internet now, you would say that sounds like some mad conspiracy theory, but it wasn't. This was the official position of MI5, And he said that they did it for two reasons. 1, they were always hassling Mi 5 for increased security around their embassy and other interests in London. And Mi 5 kept saying, well, there's no reason to increase the threat assessment. You don't need extra protection. So letting off a controlled explosion outside, of course, they immediately got what they wanted there. But crucially, 2 innocent Palestinians were arrested, charged, and convicted of conspiracy to cause that attack. And they were very active in a Palestinian port network in London, political campaigning for the people on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. And they were getting some traction in the media. They were getting quite a lot of support. So by arresting these people and framing them from attack and sticking them in prison, the whole network just shattered.
Saved - December 1, 2023 at 5:09 PM

@davincentjames - Vincent James

The 1965 Hart-Celler immigration act was introduced because previous immigration policy was deemed 'racist.' This has led to a record foreign-born population and an irreversible demographic change. Here is what Ted Kennedy promised as he introduced this bill though up by Emanuel Celler.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ted Kennedy promised that the proposed bill would not flood cities with a million immigrants annually, nor upset the ethnic mix of the country. He stated that the bill would not allow entry to subversive persons, criminals, illiterates, or those with contagious diseases or serious mental illnesses. However, a single mother who entered the US by swimming across the Rio Grande receives government-funded housing, medication, and $700 a month in social security. This contradicts Kennedy's claims and is considered a complete lie.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ted Kennedy, the literal lady killer himself, trotted out on stage and promised the following about this bill. Out of deference to the critics, I want to comment on what the bill will not do. 1st, our cities will not be flooded with a 1000000 immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains exactly the same. Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset. Contrary to the charges in some quarters, this bill will not inundate America with any immigrant from any one country or area We're the most populated and economically deprived nations of Africa and Asia. In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under The proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think. Thirdly, the bill will not permit the entry of subversive persons, criminals, illiterates are those with contagious diseases or serious mental illnesses. As I noted a moment ago, no immigrant visa will be issued to a person who is likely to become a public charge. Speaker 1: Yet the 50 year old single mother who entered the US by swimming across the Rio Grande has government funded housing, medication, and 700 dollars a month in social security Speaker 0: Obviously, that entire statement was a complete 100% lie as we know today.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Foreign born population hits 49 million for the first time in history. https://t.co/HwdJ76YPWq

Saved - November 30, 2023 at 6:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Why are refugees sent to predominantly white states in the US? The IRC is often involved. The founder changed his name from Jacob Liebstein to Jay Love. Leo Cherne's significance is unclear. The parent company of Agency for New Americans receives funding from multiple sources.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

1. Why are they sending refugees to the whitest states in the US and then buying them houses? 2. Why is the IRC always the main one behind it? 3. Why did the founder change his name from Jacob Liebstein to Jay Love 4. Who was Leo Cherne 5. Where does the parent company of Agency for New Americans get their money and how many companies are behind them?

@Indian_Bronson - ib

Remember: no Americans ever voted for this, and it will never be put up for a vote, and they and all of their children will get the vote https://t.co/HBGHE8jySu

Saved - November 27, 2023 at 3:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Who did 9/11? The events surrounding 9/11 raise numerous unanswered questions. From the involvement of Israeli art students and the dancing Israelis to the roles of individuals like Douglas Feith, Richard Perle, and Jonathan Pollard, there are connections worth exploring. The PNAC, Clean Break Memo, and Project for a New American Century also come into play. Additionally, the suspicious circumstances surrounding the hijackers, the intelligence provided, and the truck full of explosives raise further doubts. It's crucial to delve deeper into these aspects to understand the truth behind 9/11.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Who did 9/11? https://t.co/n6WM1fYkVn

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, callers discuss a report by Carl Cameron from Fox News about Israeli spying in the United States. The report claimed that Israel was tapping phones and secure lines of the FBI, CIA, and White House. It also mentioned a team of Israeli intelligence agents posing as art students. The callers express concern about the lack of coverage and the removal of the report from Fox News' website. Cameron confirms the report and explains that it was taken down to make room for other news. He also mentions that the documents he used have since been corroborated worldwide. Representative Harmon comments on the deportation of Israeli art students but does not provide specific details.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Los Angeles, good morning. Speaker 1: Good morning. Brian, thank you for your network actually. Mister Wolff, I back in December, Carl Cameron from Fox News ran a 4 part series that Detailed, like a really a massive spying operation by Israel that was that was tapping all the phones in the United States and tapping all the secure lines of the FBI, the CIA, and the White House. Speaker 2: All the phones in the United States? Speaker 1: Yeah. Through through companies that that that Speaker 3: Imagine that transcription effort? Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, of course, it's done with keywords and all that in software. But The other thing was that all the secure lines at the White House and basically the entire federal government, they also said, And this was corroborated in a report released by the DEA that there was a team of art students that were expelled. Actually, it was the largest Spy related expulsion in American history that had teams of intelligence guys, Israeli intelligence guys on the same block. Speaker 3: This this this was a Fox report? Speaker 1: A Fox report by Carl Cameron. It was them. And he they were the only ones that picked it up, although they were rats. Speaker 0: Is that good or bad? Did you believe the report? Speaker 1: Yeah. Oh, yeah. There definitely was a true report. The the local newspaper reports had it and others, but no no one on the air carried except Fox News. And then to make matters worse, Fox News, even on their web, you can go into December archives and look at the port well, actually, you can look at where the report was, Israeli spying or whatever. And they actually pulled it from the archives, and nobody followed up. Speaker 0: Even now Speaker 3: But this is a conspiracy of silence, are you saying? Speaker 1: Well, if you go back to the archives, miss Wolfe, you'll see that it's the only report pulled, the archives go back through, you know, like last year. Speaker 0: Okay. Thanks. Thanks for the call. Speaker 4: Next call for Bill Gertz This comes from Newark, Delaware on our independent line. Good morning. Good morning. Let's see. I was interested in the story Carl Cameron broke 120 Israeli spies that were arrested in the United States shortly after the September incident and Some of the these people had been shadowing the terrorists that that blew up the the buildings, Living in the vicinity and keeping up with them, on May 17th, 2 Israelis were arrested in Washington state in a van that had traces of high explosives. I think it was 5 Israeli military spies, you know, the way they described, were in a building in Brooklyn watching The September bombing. And all of this has been kept out of the press. And I just wonder, I mean, this is good reading. This is what we wanna know about. You know, if Israel supposedly knew and there's stories that their intelligence agency told our government that why isn't that the story? When did we know? What did they know? When did they let us know? Speaker 5: Are you familiar with this story? Speaker 0: Yes. Good questions. As for the 120 Israeli spies, That's a story that's out there. I've looked at that a a little bit. I really haven't found, really what's behind that story. What what is going on there is that there have been a number of Israelis, and, I've actually seen some people come to my house in in Maryland who are selling art, and they identify themselves as students. And there's there's something unusual about it. I have a feeling that this may be collection aspect to it, but I don't see any kind of major effort to to figure out. I know that the US government has Expelled some of these people. You mentioned the May 17th incident on the West Coast. I looked into this very carefully, And this was a story that 2 Israeli nationals were stopped in a rental van near A military I think it was a naval base in Washington state. And, the initial reports were that they had somehow detected some explosives On the steering wheel. And obviously, that's a that's a huge story. Well, I looked into it, and, the word I got from federal officials was that, it was a false indicator that there weren't really explosive traces there. Now, I don't know what to make of it. I'm I'm not out there. If I were out there, perhaps I could get a little bit closer to the story, but, the initial blush on that was the there wasn't anything to it. Speaker 5: Could you go back? You mentioned students selling art. What was the connection again to the Speaker 0: well, that somehow these Israeli art students have been spotted around a number of places, including some federal buildings, and that has raised some counterintelligence concerns within the US government That perhaps the Israelis have been conducting some type of intelligence collection activities. I haven't really been able to Get the all the facts of that story, but I've seen I think he was referring to Carl Cameron's story on Fox News, and he's he's done some good reporting Speaker 4: on it. Speaker 6: But one thing I I really wanna ask you, and I hope you bring it up when Carl Cameron comes on, is that there's a big controversy over a report he did For Fox, on 911. And where he implicated or he suggested, that it was in a 4 part series that that there were a bunch of Israeli art students that were involved in espionage and may have, been following Al Qaeda and There was concern that they were that they didn't report this incident to the American authorities and they were eventually left on Visa violation. They're arrested about a 140 of them. Carl Cameron reported this. There was a big brouhaha, and it was, on Fox's website, and it was taken off of Fox's website. And And it's been a big story in Le Monde. It's been a big story in the Yovantiki and, on big it's been reported in Salon .com. And everywhere you turn and you see the story, the whole thing is always reported about Carl Story and with these oblique quotes about Carl Cameron being puzzled by the strong reaction and everything. So please Asking Speaker 7: how do Speaker 6: you more more, you'll probably have more guests, ask Karl Cameron the same thing. Speaker 7: We've had a number of calls on that as well, and he'll be here in about, 35 minutes. We'll bring it up with him. Silver Spring, Maryland, Republican line for Carl Cameron. Yes. Speaker 8: Yes. Good morning. I'd like to I'm actually, I'm calling to congratulate mister Cameron on his reporting. He broke one of the most, but the most important stories this year with the Israeli spy ring. Problem was that Fox News pulled up the networks almost as soon as they reported it. And, I just like to ask Mr. Cameron how he felt about that and how he feels in general, when, you know, news with a potentially damaging or incriminating evident information against Israel is pulled off almost as soon as it's it's aired. Speaker 7: Thank you. And we should point out, Carl, Cameron, that one of the first calls about an hour and 20 minutes ago dealt with this very issue. First of all, what is the caller talking about and what happened? Speaker 2: In December of last year, FOX did a 4 part series. I reported a 4 part series that described several scenario, several dynamics, within the u within the continental United States. There's a report that was circulated that has now been disclosed by the DEA that reported that over the course of a year and a half, numerous federal agencies had encountered, individuals who refer to themselves as Israeli art students, essentially visiting these facilities, military installations, FBI, DEA, INS, both the publicly listed addresses as well as some that are not made public, and those particular facilities are intended to be kept, secret. And they began to ask questions and attempt to sell their art. And we reported that this was a dynamic that had been described by government documents as a Intelligence gathering operation. Following that particular story, we then described the US intelligence community's grave concerns that Our civilian telecommunications, are compromised and vulnerable to, intelligence gathering because many of the companies that provide services in our telephone calling are are owned by or closely aligned with, Israel and that they have been occasionally investigated by our federal government for tapping or taking information from our telecommunications for the purposes of intelligence. And finally, that there is a concern in our government that the way in which we actually conduct wiretapping, under law enforcement granted judge judge approved surveillance subpoenas, is also potentially vulnerable to compromise and intercept. Excuse me again, Because some of the companies involved with the manufacturing of that equipment are Israeli and that they've never been tested for vulnerabilities, and that too has been investigated as a potential threat. Potential and investigation are the important things to to remember. There is no claim by anybody in our government that the government of Israel or anybody in Israel is actually spying, That these are mysteries, that there is evidence to suggest a problem, and they've yet to been able to solve it. Speaker 7: Did anyone tell you to kill the story? Speaker 2: No. As a matter of fact, what happened was we did put the transcripts of my story on the Internet. And after a period of several days, it was taken down off the Internet, as What I've been told was merely to make available for a huge deluge of war related materials. You gotta remember this was December, So we were still very much in the throes of the September 11th aftermath, and there was, war underway in Afghanistan. And they had to make way for other news, and we've done some follow-up reporting on it. And there is, there has since since our story, which was Which was denounced by the pro Israel lobby in this country as anti Semitic and biased and and inaccurate. Much of what we've reported has now been reported all over the world Because the documents that I used and was careful to protect because some of it was considered classified in secret at the time, have now appeared virtually all over the world corroborating our story and what we reported. Speaker 9: Well, I agree that, talk should continue. Creation of a Palestinian state after the violence has stopped is a laudable goal. I I certainly hope that the Cheney visit it's a productive visit. I think the moderate Arab states have to be working closely with us to find both a way to stop The violence and, an end game that makes sense for everyone in the region, which includes the survival and security And, respect for the state of Israel, which I think is absolutely essential to an essential goal of US Foreign policy and one I strongly support. Speaker 5: And Robert Simpson emails, could you ask representative Harmon about the deportation of Israeli art students Buying in the US and should this worry us? Are you familiar with this issue? Speaker 9: Of Israeli arts, I'm certainly familiar with the fact that we have been rounding up People on student visas and considering whether they might have had anything to do with terrorism and some of those rounded up are Israelis, but I don't know the Specific facts, I would not like to to comment except to say that, I am not in favor of unlimited detention. I voted for the Patriot Act, which Passed the Congress, which put limits on detention. And I think there ought to be court review after 7 days or an appropriate period of time about why it is that we're holding people. And roundups are not things that I think

@sneako - SNEAKO

@LauraLoomer Everyone knows who really did 9/11

@davincentjames - Vincent James

What did Israeli art students have to do with 9/11? Who Did 9/11? https://t.co/LEULitVKIT

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a summary of a video discussing the connection between Israeli art students and potential bomb experts. The art students, known as the gelatin group, were involved in a project called the Bee Thing. They lived on the 91st floor of the Lower Manhattan Cultural Center and were connected to other art students traveling around the country. Suspicion arose when they were found selling art door-to-door and had thousands of fuse holders, which could be used for remote control demolition. The fuse holders were traced back to a company called Littell Fuse in Chicago. Some of the artists were believed to be Mossad bomb experts. The video also mentions the connection between the Kellogg's Corporation and the Manhattan Project, as well as the involvement of Halliburton, Dick Cheney's former company.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is the elephant in the room that nobody wanted to talk about. And this is one of the documents, a 60 61 page DEA document that I went over and over and over and connected Israeli Mossad bomb experts to an art group that were traveling around the United States and to an art group that gave themselves the name of gelatin. So are you there? I'm there. So you got those pictures. Yeah. Okay. Now I'm gonna take you to Dick Cheney. Just listen up. You're looking at those pictures. Those are some Israeli art students that came from a foreign country, and their art project was called Bee Thing. They called their team the gelatin group. And just so you understand this, gelatin is often referred gel ignite or blasting gelatin. It's also referred to as blasting jelly, but gelatin, and they later on change their name because they people started waking up to this. So they named their name their name gelatin. They called their art projects the Bee thing, and you will see on the left hand side a photograph of the title page of their book. And what the bee thing was, there was a a group called the Lower Manhattan Cultural Center that was renting the 91st floor were allowed to live on the 91st floor. These foreign art students and some of them were connected to a group of traveling art students that were all over the country that the DEA found out about because they were going door to door to some of their agents' homes and their offices. And some of the offices were not public locations, so they were, like, who are these people? There's Israeli students trying to sell this heart. This was just a smokescreen, so you wouldn't go to where we're about to go. Now the guy in the pink shirt, he's on the top right hand side, pink shirt on. He has repelling gear on. They removed a window. This was their art project. They put a wooden balcony out, and they had photographs taken via a helicopter that was rented by their sponsor from the Lower Manhattan Cultural Center. And that particular gentleman also had a big party to celebrate this event, and he rented part of the top floors of the Millennium Hotel. You'll remember that from 911 and who was there, the Bush, relative. And, took pictures and had a big, champagne party watching pingness. Okay? Look behind the gentleman in the pink shirt. You're gonna see 2 big bold numbers. It says BB eighteen. Those are fuse holders. Now look at all 3 pictures. And look at how many boxes of plastic fuse holders that can be used for remote control demolition. And ask yourself, why would art students from Israel and Austria be having thousands of fuse holders. This building was built in the early 1970s. They weren't electricians. They weren't redoing all of the electricity in that building. You know, think about this. Okay, so I get this book out, I'm waiting for my shipment of books to show up, and I literally had a voice say to me, look into this. Those fuses, by the way, come from a company called Littell Fuse, l I t t e l, Fuse Company. They're located in Chicago. And some little voice said to me, take a look into this Lightel Fuse Company, where all of those fuse holders behind those artists are. And now some of those artists are guaranteed Mossad bomb experts, and that's in the DEA document that you can read. So I find out that Lytle Company is a subsidiary of a corporation called Tracor, t r a c o r. Now Tracor, they went bankrupt and split their company. They were a government contractor. They split them off into TRACOR Aviation, LITEL FUSE, and TRACOR defense holdings. They're based in Austin, Texas. They were bought out by Westmark systems. Bobby Ray Inman was the chairman of Westmark at a point. Then Westmark kinda started losing it, and Traycor bought them back. Trade corps bought out a company called Vitro, which used to be the Klex company. Let me tell you about Kellogg's company. The Kellogg's Corporation was a wholly owned subsidiary of M. W. Kellogg, as in serial, you know, that guy Kellogg company. Kellogg's was formed in 1942 that the so Kellogg's operation relating to the Manhattan Project could be kept separate and secret. Patent project could be kept separate and secret, kel meaning Kellogg, and x meaning secret. The new company's goal was to design a facility for the production of enrichment enriched uranium through a gaseous diffusion technique. In gaseous diffusion, isotopes of Uranium 235 could be separated from uranium 238 by turning uranium metal into uranium hexafluoride gas and straining it through a barrier material. Now this is kind of interesting to period. Now this is kind of interesting too. So for those of you who remember that originally, the first responders were getting calls that there was a missile launched from the Woolworth Building. The newly formed Kellogg's company's original headquarters were in the Woolworth Building in Lower Manhattan. I know. This is another coincidence, isn't it? They later on moved to Oak Ridge, Tennessee. But now the COLEX company, you will know them today. Here we are fastening your seatbelts as Halliburton. Dick Cheney's old company.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Who were the dancing israelis? Who did 9/11? https://t.co/35XvWiq4GO

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, rumors circulated about a group of Middle Eastern men seen near New York City. This led to speculation about Israeli espionage on US soil. A witness reported seeing three men on top of a van taking pictures with the burning Twin Towers in the background. The police later stopped the van and arrested five Israeli men. Some of them were connected to Israeli intelligence, which raised concerns at the FBI. The FBI wanted to know who these men were, why they were in that parking lot on September 11, and if they had prior knowledge of the attacks. The men claimed they were just taking pictures and worked for a company called Urban Moving. The company's offices were later abandoned, leaving behind boxes and computers. The Israelis were interrogated and given lie detector tests. While opinions differ, many investigators believe that the men were involved in some form of intelligence work.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the days after the September attacks, there were countless rumors about strange coincidences surrounding the events. One report about a group of Middle Eastern men spotted the morning of September 11th parked just across the river from New York City has not gone away. Investigation of their presence has led to questions about whether Israel was conducting espionage on US soil. We're joined now by ABC's John Miller with an exclusive report this evening. Speaker 1: That's right, Elizabeth. This is a case that took The FBI and the CIA more than 2 months to sort out, while 5 Israelis waited in jail. It began when this woman was watching the Twin Towers Burning from her apartment in New Jersey, she noticed 3 men on top of a van posing for pictures with the towers burning in the background. Speaker 2: And I could see that they were, like, happy. You know? They they they were they didn't look sharp to me. You know? They didn't look sharp. I thought it was very strange. Speaker 1: The witness called police who stopped the van hours later and arrested 5 men. All 5, it turns out, were Israeli. They were turned over to the FBI. Sources tell ABC News during a check of national security databases, Some of the men were listed as having had connections with Israeli intelligence. At the FBI, that set off alarm bells. The FBI needed the answers to 3 important questions. Who were these men? What brought them to that parking lot on the morning of September 11th? And did they have any advanced knowledge of what was going to happen that day? The men said they were just taking pictures at the time. They said they worked for a company called Urban Moving. The FBI obtained a search warrant for the company's offices. Speaker 2: 2 SUVs were filled up with Between 9 and 12 boxes and computers. Speaker 1: Not long after the arrest, the offices of Urban Moving were simply abandoned. Almost everything was left behind. In jail, the 5 Israelis were repeatedly interrogated and given lie detector tests. Stephen Gordon was their American lawyer. They were asked Questions if they had ever been approached by or hired by any non United States intelligence community. While there is still some debate among American intelligence officials, many investigators believe

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Who is Douglas Feith? Who is Richard Perle? Who is Jonathan Pollard? Who did 9/11? https://t.co/BVkV19RFNR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jonathan Pollard, a civilian working for the Navy, was charged with passing secrets to Israel over 16 years ago. He pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit espionage and is currently serving a life sentence. Initially, Israeli leaders denied involvement, but later accepted responsibility for his actions. Recent reports suggest that some US investigators suspect Israeli individuals of engaging in spying activities within the US, potentially withholding information prior to September 11th.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It has been more than 16 years since a civilian working for the Navy was charged with passing secrets to Israel. Jonathan Pollard plead guilty to conspiracy to commit espionage and is serving a life sentence. At first, Israeli leaders claimed Pollard was part of a rogue operation, but later took responsibility for his work. Now Fox News has learned some US investigators believe that there are Israelis again very much engaged in spying in and on the US who may have known things they didn't tell us before September 11th. Fox News correspondent

@davincentjames - Vincent James

What is PNAC? What is the Clean Break Memo? Who Did 9/11? https://t.co/P0h2LvdT0q

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the possibility that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job, with evidence pointing towards multiple groups being involved, including government representatives and an ally country. It highlights the Clean Break Memo, a foreign policy document written in 1996, which advocated for aggressive actions in the Middle East, including the removal of Saddam Hussein from power. The video also mentions the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), a think tank formed in 1997, whose members went on to serve in the Bush administration and played a role in shaping foreign policy, particularly in support of the Iraq war. The video concludes by mentioning various controversial aspects related to the attacks and encourages viewers to explore further.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everyone in the world has heard of 911. Everyone in America knows the phrase, never forget. Everyone old enough remembers where they were that day, but very few have been shown some of the things I will present to you in this video. Some of you may have heard the term 911 was an inside job, And some of you may believe it, and some of you may not. Some of you though may have considered this a possibility, but just assumed it would never be proven. But what if I were to tell you that there is undeniable information that points towards this being true? What if I told you that there is overwhelming evidence that multiple groups were involved in carrying out this attack with the help of government representatives and people from a country we call our ally. To show you exactly what I mean and who I believe the architects of this catastrophic tragedy were, you have to go back to a think tank that was formed in 1990 Just before the 2000 and one attacks and a memo that was written in 1996. The think tank was called the project for a new American century, also known as PNAC. The infamous memo was known as the clean break memo and was written in 1996, just months prior to the formation of the PNAC think tank By another think tank called the Institute For Advanced Strategic and Political Studies. Now, let's start with the clean break memo. This was a foreign policy document that was prepared in 1996 by the Institute For Advanced Strategic and Political Studies also known as IASPS. This group was led by Richard Perle. The memo was written in attention to Benjamin Netanyahu, then and current prime minister of Israel. The report talked about how to solve Israel's security problems in the Middle East with an emphasis on western values by removing leaders from power and installing puppets into new regimes. The memo advocated for an aggressive new policy including the removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and the overthrow of Syria by engaging in proxy warfare and highlighting its alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction. Many critics say that this document led to the deaths of thousands upon thousands of American soldiers. Speaker 1: Once Saddam has nuclear weapons, Speaker 2: the terror network will have nuclear weapons. The next thing Speaker 1: you'll see is a nuclear bomb in the World Trade Center. Speaker 2: If you take out Saddam, Saddam's regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region. Speech was, I think a thorough, and powerful indictment of Saddam's attempts to conceal and deceive, the world to conceal the, efforts that he's making at producing weapons of mass destruction. We in Israel have known this for a long time. We've shared this intelligence with the United States, and I think that the United States has shared, some of that today, in of its own intelligence with the world. Speaker 0: According to the preamble in Memo, it was centered around a new Israeli strategy. Former United States assistant secretary of defense, Brigitte Pearl, was the study group leader, but final reports included ideas from Douglas Fife and IASPS president Robert Lowenberg. For the sake of keeping this video short, I'll let you read the clean break memo On your own for yourselves, however, throughout the entire memo, it suggested overthrowing and destabilizing several Middle Eastern countries and called for preemptive strikes on Palestine Along with quote, hot pursuit into Palestinian controlled areas, a justifiable practice with which Americans will sympathize. Douglas Fife later came under fire after the Iraq war when he was accused of doctoring information and being one of the architects of the war that killed many thousands of our sons, brothers, fathers and children. Speaker 3: Fife is a bureaucratic bully hell bent on war. The most frequent and damaging charge It's been that Fife used his Pentagon office to produce alternative intelligence reports that link Saddam to Al Qaeda, then pass them on to the White House. Some of it, like the report that 911 hijacker Mohammed Ada met with Iraqi intelligence in Prague, has been widely discredited. An investigation by the Pentagon's inspector general called FICE activities inappropriate but not illegal or unauthorized. This was a rebuke. You agree? Speaker 4: Yes. And I and I think it was an unfounded rebuke. An unfounded rebuke. Speaker 3: Are you happy with the way things have played out in Iraq? Speaker 4: No. I don't think anybody can be happy. We we've We've had terrible losses. We have the the Americans who've lost their lives and and the Iraqis who've lost their lives, our coalition partners. It's been you know a costly war. Speaker 3: Do you still think this was the right thing to do knowing now what you know? Speaker 4: I think the president made the right decision given what he knew And given what we all knew. And to tell you the truth, even given what we've learned since Speaker 0: The Project for A New American Century, the other think tank formed months The IASPS was founded and directed by some of the same architects of the war and the same members of the IASPS, including Bill Kristol, a man who currently never waste a chance on Twitter to attack Trump on things like immigration and trade while also cheering on the indictment of Trump. Robert Kagan, Randy Schoeman and Donald Rumsfeld. Donald Rumsfeld, for instance, was named once by General Wesley Clark who spilled the beans on the plan for Change and war in all of the pre planned countries. Here is what the general had to say. Speaker 5: About 10 days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw secretary And and deputy secretary Wolfowitz, I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the joint staff who used used to work for me. And one of the generals called me and he said, sir, you gotta Come in. You gotta come in and talk to me a second. I said, well, you're too busy. He said, no. No. He says, we've made the decision. We're going to war with Iraq. This was on or about the 20th September. I said, we're going to war with Iraq? Why? He said, I don't know. He said, I guess they don't know what else to do. So, I said, well, did they find some information collect connecting Saddam to Al Qaeda? He said, no. No. It's just there's nothing new that way. They just Made the decision to go to war with Iraq. He said, I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists, but we got a good military and we can take down governments. And, he said I guess if the only do you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail. So I came back to see him a few weeks later, And by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan, I said, are we still going to war with Iraq? And he said, oh, it's worse than that. He said he reached over on his desk, he picked up a piece of paper, and he said, I just He said I just got this down from upstairs, me and the secretary of defense office today, and he said this is a memo that describes how we're gonna take out 7 countries In 5 years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and finishing off Iran. Speaker 0: Other notable signatories and members were Jeb Bush, Dick Cheney, Elliot Cohen, Aaron Friedberg, Steven Rosen, Paul Wolfowitz, and of course, John Bolton, a psychopathic warmonger who has called for the bombing of Iran, North Korea, and the overthrow of Syria on several occasions. Of the 25 people who signed PNAC's founding statement of Principles 10 went on to serve in the administration of US president George w Bush, including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, John Bolton, and Paul Wolfowitz. Observers such as Erwin Stelzer and Dave Grondin have suggested that the p neck played a key role in shaping the foreign policy of the Bush administration Particularly, in building support for the Iraq war. Under the Clinton administration, before George Bush, Krystle and Kagan advocated regime change in Iraq throughout the Iraqi Saruman process and shortly after this, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliot Abrams, Donald Rumsfeld, Robert Zolick, and John Bolton penned an open letter initiated by PNAC to president Bill Clinton calling for the complete removal of Saddam Hussein, Believing that UN sanctions against Iraq would be an ineffective means of disarming Iraq, PNEC members also wrote a letter to congress urging them To support the Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998, which president Clinton signed into law in October of 1998. The Iraqi Liberation Act, while having an innocent humanitarian sounding name, was just a policy stating that the US should remove Saddam Hussein from power in rock. Now, once again, remember this was all before September 11, 2001. But the famous and most important publication by PNAC was a 90 page report entitled rebuilding America's defenses. In the 1997 statement, it suggested quote, the preceding decade itself. Meaning, we cannot have global peace forever. The document also established 4 core missions for US military forces. Number 1, the defense of the American homeland. Number 2, the fighting and winning of multiple simultaneous major theater wars. Number 3, the performance of duties associated with shaping the security environment in key regions. And number 4, the transformation of US forces to exploit the revolution in military The most cited and most extremely controversial section of rebuilding America's defenses was entitled creating tomorrow's dominant force. Written before the September 11th attacks, this section stated, further, the process of this transformation, even if it brings a revolutionary change, is likely to be a long absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor. Now what could they mean by this. What on earth could they mean by needing a catastrophic and catalyzing event? Speaker 6: It has been more than 16 years since a civilian working for the navy was charged with passing secrets To Israel, Jonathan Pollard plead guilty to conspiracy to commit espionage and is serving a life sentence. At first, Israeli leaders claimed Pollard was a rogue operation but later took responsibility for his work. Now Fox News has learned some US investigators believe that there are Israelis again very much engaged spying in and on the US who may have known things they didn't tell us before September 11th. Fox News correspondent Carl Cameron has details in the first of a Four part series. Speaker 7: Since September 11th, more than 60 Israelis have been arrested or detained either under the new Patriot Anti terrorism Law or for immigration violations. A handful of active Israeli military were among those detained according to investigators, who say some of the detainees also failed Polygraph questions when asked about alleged surveillance activities against and in the United States. There is no indication that the Israelis were involved in the nine eleven attacks, but investigators suspect The Israelis may have gathered intelligence about the attacks in advance and not shared it. A highly placed investigator said there are quote tie ins. But when asked for details, he flatly refused describe them saying quote, evidence linking these Israelis to 911 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information. Speaker 1: You saw what happened? How you heard what happened? Yeah. You heard that right? Oh. You think that was like It sounded like it right by the right by the building. It's Holy shit on. No. Speaker 8: Get the other building. That's terrorists. Other building? Speaker 1: That's terrorists, bro. That's fucking terrorists. Holy Oh my That's Paracel. They just sent out. Did you get that? I I I I seen down on it. Do you want the people dead? I don't know, man. Marines, whatever. Stop. Where? Where? They know exactly where. Speaker 0: Now the project for New American Century ceased to function in 2006. It was replaced by a new think tank named the foreign policy initiative cofounded again by Bill Kristol and Kagan in 2009. The foreign policy initiative was dissolved in 2017 when Republican hedge fund billionaire, Paul Singer, Stopped funding the think tank because he said he was critical of president Trump during his presidential campaign saying his trade policies were guaranteed to cause a global depression, a widespread global depression. He said the organization was set up to really accomplish two main things which was to basically try to keep the republican party focused on Iraq Afghanistan. That mission is no longer relevant. From the massive insurance policy that Larry Silverstein took out in the trade center right before the attacks to none of his family members or himself showing up for work that day, to the recording of Silverstein telling someone to demolish Building 7 to the 5 dancing facade agents seen celebrating while filming the attack who were later arrested, there is much much Much more to the truth behind this tragic day that I encourage you to follow within the documentaries linked in the description. I will leave it up to all of you to decide if this information is significant or if it can be brushed off as a coincidental conspiracy. But for now, let's remember this day, mourn the lives is lost and never ever ever forget.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Who had the most to gain? Who's closest threats were taken out and destabilized in the resulting wars? Who did 9/11? https://t.co/ZASOsasMlG

Video Transcript AI Summary
Saddam having nuclear weapons means the terror network will too, possibly leading to a nuclear bomb in the World Trade Center. Removing Saddam's regime would have positive effects on the region. Iraq is the right choice for a regime change and to eliminate the nuclear threat. Portable centrifuges, slightly larger than two cameras, make it easy for Saddam to hide his nuclear weapons. If he had them on September 11th, we wouldn't be here. Arafat needs to be removed due to the nuclear threat.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Once Saddam has nuclear weapons, the terror network will have nuclear weapons. Next thing you'll see is a nuclear bomb in the World Trade Center. If you take out Saddam, Saddam's regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region. I think the choice of Iraq is a good choice. It's the right choice. Eliminating the nuclear threat from Iraq and begin a regime change there, portable centrifuges that are a little bigger than those 2 cameras. It's not very difficult. You can get away with it. And he has gotten away with it, frankly. Because if they had nuclear weapons on September 11th, we couldn't meet here. Go ahead. Make my day. Arafat has to go. Nuclear threat

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Who provided the vast majority of intelligence about weapons of mass destruction? Which country benefited the most? Who did 9/11? https://t.co/7WLn64mh2k

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker praises the speech as a strong condemnation of Saddam's efforts to hide his weapons of mass destruction. Israel has long been aware of this and has shared intelligence with the United States. The United States has also shared some of its own intelligence with the world. Israel believes it has the right and obligation to protect its citizens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Speech was, I think, a thorough, and powerful indictment of, Saddam's attempts to conceal and deceive, the world, to conceal the efforts that he's making at producing weapons of mass destruction. We in Israel have known this for a long Iran. We've shared this intelligence with the United States. We've shared this intelligence with the United States. We've shared this intelligence with the United States. We've shared intelligence with the United States. And I think that the United States has shared, some of that today, and of its own intelligence with the world. Israel reserves the natural right, I would say, obligation of any government to protect its citizens, and we shall

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Why was American-born Jonathan Pollard — who stole top secret US intel and passed it to Israel —greeted with a hero's welcome by Bibi, after being released from American prison? Why did he call his arrival 'homecoming'? Who did 9/11? https://t.co/WU6z2Ypx9o

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are thrilled to have a bison with us after 35 years. We express our gratitude to the people and the Prime Minister of Israel for bringing us home.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's about a bison. Come and talk to him about a bison. We are ecstatic to be holding his ass after 35 years. Wow. And we thank the people and the prime minister of Israel for bringing us home.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

What was the 'New Pearl Harbor'? What is 'A New Strategy for Securing the Realm'? What is the Project for a New American Century? Who did 9/11? https://t.co/uEs77NP9Rn

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Why did the brother and father of Robert Kagan — the man who founded PNAC with Bill Kristol — call for a ground invasion in Palestine across various news stations just a day after 9/11? Who did 9/11? https://t.co/Jlgg4hXQ0S

Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Kagan and Frederick Kagan discuss the need for strong US action in Palestine. They believe that the Palestinian authority, particularly Arafat, is connected to terrorist organizations and should be removed. They suggest deploying ground forces, like Delta Force raids, to restore peace and suppress terrorism. They also highlight the potential threat of biological weapons and the importance of preventing such attacks. Overall, they emphasize the need for decisive military action to protect against future threats.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the Pentagon, conversation with Donald Kagan of Yale University and Frederick Kagan, his son of the United States Military Academy, as they offer their recommendations for US action. Gentlemen, good evening. Speaker 1: Hello. Good evening, though. Speaker 2: We are at our worst and the Arabs are angriest at us and treat us the worst when they perceive us as being weak. And one key place is certainly the Palestinian authority. These guys are at the center of all sorts of terrorist organizations that we've seen operate before. Speaker 1: And we also know furthermore where they're located. We know that they have extensive bases in Palestine and Palestinian area. We have to take the war to these people. I think we should hit them immediately. How? Reason to wait. How? Speaker 0: Air power? Speaker 1: No. I would prefer to see ground forces going to Palestine and hunt out Hezbollah. I would like to see, Delta Force raids. I would like to see the full panoply of covert operations, but I would also like to see American ground forces deployed into Palestine but I would also like to see American ground forces deployed into Palestine to restore peace in that area. Speaker 0: Now wait, I must ask you, Don. Do you mean the Palestinian authority, the PLO? Speaker 2: Oh, Arafat. Speaker 0: Arafat or do you mean Hamas and his brother? No. Speaker 2: No. I mean Arafat. We know he sponsors it. We know he supports it. Then our responsibility is to clean it out For him, including him, and placing a regime or seeing to it that a regime replaces it, which can suppress terrorism. Speaker 0: Well, now what does that mean again in terms of military military Military force. Absolutely. Donald Kagan, I begin to get the sense that you're suggesting if we do this, We need to take strong military action including land forces. Not only against the Taliban in Afghanistan, but I would suppose at the same time, against the Arafat regime in the Palestinian Authority. Speaker 2: Absolutely. I'm I'm sure in 3, 4 days, everybody is in spite of what happened in New York and Washington, Everybody go back to where we were before Mhmm. And think, okay. That's that was a one shot. That's over. But what would have happened If instead of just having a lot of jet fuel on those planes, they had had anthrax facility. Any clue what that would have been? Now those are the options that are before us. People are capable of doing that. Our question is, how can we stop them from being able to do that? There is no way

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Who is Robert Kagan, Who is Bill Kristol, who is Victoria Nuland? Who did 9/11? https://t.co/uL0JvM1vfC

@davincentjames - Vincent James

What did they mean by this? Why did they say this? Who did 9/11? https://t.co/H1NbpsX8jJ

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Who was Douglas Feith and why did he get away with doctoring intelligence surrounding invading Iraq? Who did 9/11? https://t.co/njCKKcnpoM

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Fife faced criticism for his involvement in the Iraq war and accusations of manipulating information. Speaker 1 claims Fife produced alternative intelligence reports linking Saddam to Al Qaeda, but some of these reports have been discredited. The Pentagon's inspector general found Fife's activities inappropriate but not illegal. Speaker 2 agrees with the rebuke but acknowledges the devastating losses in Iraq. When asked if the war was the right decision, Speaker 2 believes the president made the right choice based on the information available. The Project For A New American Century, a think tank connected to the war's architects, is mentioned, including Bill Kristol, Robert Kagan, Randy Schoeman, and Donald Rumsfeld. General Wesley Clark previously revealed a plan for regime change and war.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Came under fire after the Iraq war when he was accused of doctoring information and being one of the architects of the war that killed many thousands of our sons, brothers, fathers, and children. Speaker 1: Fife is a bureaucratic bully hell bent on war. The most frequent and damaging charge has been that Fife used his Pentagon office to produce alternative intelligence reports that links Saddam to Al Qaeda and pass them on to the White House. Some of it like a report that 911 hijacker Mohammed Ada met with Iraqi intelligence in Prague has been widely discredited. An investigation by the Pentagon's inspector general called FICE activities inappropriate, but not illegal or unauthorized. This was a rebuke. You agree? Speaker 2: Yes. And I and I think it was an unfounded rebuke. An unfounded rebuke Are you happy with the way things Speaker 1: have played out in Iraq? No. Speaker 2: I don't think anybody can be happy. We we've we've had terrible losses. We have the the Americans who've lost their lives and and the Iraqis who've lost their lives, our coalition partners. It's been, you know, a costly war. Speaker 1: Do you still think this was the right thing to do knowing now what you know? Speaker 2: I I think the president made the right decision given what he knew and given what we all knew. And to tell you the truth, even given what we've learned since. Speaker 0: The Project For A New American Century, the other think tank formed months after IASPS was founded and directed by some of the same architects of the war and the same members of the IASPS including Bill Kristol, a man who currently never wastes a chance on Twitter to attack Trump on things like immigration and trade while also cheering on the indictment of Trump, Robert Kagan, Randy Schoeman and Donald Rumsfeld. Donald Rumsfeld, for instance, was named once by General Wesley Clark who spilled the beans on the plan for regime change and war

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Who was Urban Moving Systems? Why would they say this? Who did 9/11? https://x.com/Lucas_Gage_/status/1726821393675800689?s=20

@Lucas_Gage_ - Lucas Gage

👀 One of the Israelis arrested around 911 told this to the FBI. Do you not see how much our country has been destroyed since 2001, in the exact way the Zionist terrorist described? https://t.co/WyXYIOcOoi

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Why did an elite military study made public just one day before 9/11 talk about the Mossad’s ability to stage an attack on the US and make it look like an Arab attack? Who did 9/11? https://t.co/YbnhDuySo5

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Why did people get text messages two hours before the 9/11 attacks, warning them on a messenger service called ODIGO purchased by the Israeli company Comverse Technology in 2002? Who did 9/11? https://t.co/zE0mW7bo0D

@davincentjames - Vincent James

“The had a truck with a ton of explosives in it.” Who was driving the trucks and vans full of explosives? Why did this disappear? Who did 9/11? https://t.co/dT8KB3DMKC https://t.co/LK9L7OR9qC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two planes hit the World Trade Center in New York, but there are reports that a car or truck packed with explosives also exploded, causing the buildings to collapse. The FBI is investigating this theory. Meanwhile, in New Jersey, a truck loaded with explosives was stopped by authorities, and two men were detained. The Joint Terrorist Task Force is questioning them. Another van near the George Washington Bridge was pulled over, and law enforcement found tons of explosives inside. Thankfully, the police prevented another terrorist attack on the bridge. Two suspects are now in FBI custody.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Attacks. Jack, what can you tell us happened first in New York? Speaker 1: Apparently, what appears to happen was that at the same time, 2 planes hit the building that there that the FBI most likely thinks that there was a car or truck packed with explosives underneath the buildings, which also exploded at the same time and brought both of them down. Speaker 0: Now that's the 1st time we're hearing that. So 2 planes and explosives that were in the building. Is that Speaker 1: That is the working theory at this point. That is still unconfirmed. That is what the FBI is doing. Speaker 2: The New York City Police Department has a report That the FBI is responding to New Jersey because a truck reportedly, loaded with explosives has been stopped By authorities on the road there and, the men with that truck had been detained. Members of the Joint Terrorist Task Force, according to the New York police officials, are responding to Question those people. I wanna underline that, all the phones, to police headquarters and to the FBI, from here Seem to be disabled. Speaker 3: They stopped the truck. They found an entire truck full of explosives, and they arrested them. Those 2 men and their explosives are in police custody tonight, and another tragedy has been averted. Speaker 4: Still alive in the rubble in and around the World Trade Center. And word late tonight that 2 suspects are in FBI custody after a truckload of explosives was discovered around the George Washington Bridge. That bridge, links New York to New Jersey over the Hudson River. Whether the discovery of those explosives had anything to do with other events today is unclear, But the FBI has 2 suspects in hand, said the truck, load of explosives enough explosives were in the truck to do great damage to the George Washington Bridge, But they arrested the 2 suspects, and they are questioning him as we speak. Speaker 5: And that it was near the George Washington Bridge. There were 2 or 3 men who were in the van. The van was Pulled over. It is not clear why the van was pulled over, but when it was, law enforcers found, Tons of explosives inside of the van. Speaker 2: George Washington Bridge. Marsha. Speaker 3: Well, you know, Todd, it's really an amazing thing. Most of New York City's Steel operations and their police and fire departments have been concentrating their actions down in lower Manhattan where the planes, Two planes hit the 2 towers of the World Trade Center, but some very, intelligent and aggressive cops also stopped Another terrorist attack from happening on the George Washington Bridge. CBS 2 has learned exclusively that 2 men are in custody tonight After being arrested at the George Washington Bridge with an entire truckload of explosives.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Foreign correspondent Jack Kelly reports that in the 9/11 attacks, two planes hit the World Trade Center buildings in New York. There is a working theory that explosives were also present in the buildings and that a car or truck packed with explosives exploded simultaneously, causing the buildings to collapse. The New York City Police Department stopped a truck in New Jersey, finding it loaded with explosives. Two suspects were arrested and are being questioned. Additionally, law enforcement pulled over a van near the George Washington Bridge and discovered tons of explosives inside. This prevented another terrorist attack. The FBI has issued an all points bulletin for a white Chevy van with New Jersey registration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joining me is Jack Kelly. Now he is a foreign correspondent. He has some information about these attacks. Jack, what can you tell us happened first in New Speaker 1: York? Apparently, what appears to happen was that at the same time, 2 planes hit the building that there that the FBI most likely thinks that there was a car or truck packed with explosives underneath the buildings, which also exploded at the same time and brought both of them down. Speaker 0: Now that's the first time we're hearing that. So 2 planes and for explosives that were in the building. Is that correct? Speaker 1: That is the working theory at this point. That is still unconfirmed. That is what the FBI is doing at this point. Speaker 2: The New York City Police department has a report that the FBI is responding to New Jersey because a truck reportedly, first? Loaded with explosives has been stopped by authorities on the road there and, the men with that truck had been detained. First? The members of the Joint Terrorist Task Force according to the New York police officials are responding to question those people, or an underline fur That, all the phones, to police headquarters and to the FBI, from here seem to be disabled. Speaker 3: They stopped the truck. Fur They found an entire truck full of explosives, and they arrested them. Those 2 men and their explosives are in police custody for tonight and another tragedy has been averted. Speaker 4: Still alive in the rubble in and around the World Trade Center. And word late tonight that 2 suspects are in FBI custody After a truckload of explosives was discovered around the George Washington Bridge, that bridge, links New York to New Jersey over the Hudson River. Whether the discovery of those explosives had anything to do with other events today is unclear, but the FBI has 2 suspects in hand said the truck, load of explosives. Enough explosives were in the truck to do great damage to the George Washington Bridge, but they arrested the 2 suspects, and they are questioning him as we speak. Fur And that Speaker 5: it was near the George Washington Bridge. There were 2 or 3 men who were in the van. The van was pulled over. It is not for why the van was pulled over, but when it was, law enforcers found, tons of explosives inside of the van. Speaker 2: First? George Washington Bridge, Marsha. Speaker 3: Well, you know, Todd, it's really an amazing thing. Most of New York City's rescue operations and their police and Fire departments have been concentrating their actions down in lower Manhattan where the planes 2 planes hit the 2 towers of the World Trade Center, But some very, intelligent and aggressive cops also stopped another terrorist attack from happening on the George Washington Bridge. Fur CBS 2 has learned exclusively that 2 men are in custody tonight after being arrested at the George Washington Bridge with an A higher truckload of explosives. Speaker 6: The FBI has now put out a nationwide APD, all points bulletin, for a white for Chevy van with New Jersey registration. Written on the back is urban moving systems.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

How did their passports end up in pristine condition after the crash? Why were they all supposedly mostly Saudi Arabian hijackers? Who did 9/11?

@jakeshieldsajj - Jake Shields

Excellent questions https://t.co/fXQqD8VfvJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mohammed Ada's passport miraculously survived the plane explosion and was found intact within 48 hours. The presence of passports on domestic flights raises questions, as they would not be needed after the suicide flights. Additionally, the hijackers were not under surveillance despite being easily identifiable. Suspicion grows with the discovery of planted evidence, including anthrax letters that falsely blamed Muslims. It was later revealed that the anthrax originated from a US army lab, not from Muslims. Furthermore, there are no airport security videos showing the accused Muslims boarding the hijacked planes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How could Mohammed Ada's passport survive the fireball explosion that supposedly cremated him? Fly out of his pocket, fly out of the incinerated plane, flutter to the ground in the 2 feet of debris, and end up in readable condition in the hands of investigators all within 48 hours. Why did 19 Muslim men even need passports on domestic flights? Out how were passports found but not the plane's voice recorders? Why did the hijackers need passports they would never use again after their suicide flights? Out. And why were the 19 accused Muslims not under surveillance on 911 if they were so easy to identify? Out. The conspicuous trail of planted evidence continued 3 weeks after the nine one one attacks when anthrax letters killed 5 people and were clearly worded to throw the blame on Muslims. Death to America, death to Israel, Allah is great. It has since been proven that the anthrax came from a US army lab and was never mailed by Muslims. There are no airport security videos of any of the 19 accused Muslims boarding any of the hijacked planes.

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Who were the hijackers? Why does the news report they were Saudis? Why did their alleged accents sound like this? What was urban moving systems? Who were the Israeli art students? Who did 9/11?

@jakeshieldsajj - Jake Shields

More unanswered questions from 9/11 https://t.co/QyXLczwS1C

Video Transcript AI Summary
The hijacker's accent matches an Israeli Hebrew accent, according to the voice recorder from the hijacked plane. It has been confirmed by FBI director Mueller, BBC News, and ABC that 7 out of the 19 Muslims whose mugshots were shown worldwide did not die in the 9/11 crashes. They are alive and victims of identity theft. One of the accused Muslims died a year before the hijackings. It raises questions about who stole their identities and why the FBI isn't searching for them. If the hijackers were truly Muslims, why would they implicate fellow Muslims by stealing their identities? Wouldn't it make more sense for them to blame Israelis by stealing Israeli identities? Similarly, if the hijackers were Israelis, wouldn't they be more likely to steal Muslim identities and put the blame on Muslims?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The voice of the hijacker heard from the hijacked planes voice recorder reveals that the accent of the hijacker matches an Israeli Hebrew accent. The next transmission comes seconds later. FBI director Mueller, BBC News and ABC have confirmed that 7 of the 19 Muslims whose mugshots were flashed around the world did not die in the 911 crashes. They are alive and well and are victims of identity theft. An 8th accused Muslim died 1 year before the 9 one one hijackings even occurred. Who stole their identities, He's and why isn't the FBI looking for them? If the hijackers really were Muslims, why would they steal the identities of fellow Muslims implicate them. Wouldn't they be more likely to steal Israeli identities and put the blame on Israelis? If the hijackers were Israelis, Wouldn't they be likely to steal the identities of Muslims and put the blame on Muslims?
Saved - November 20, 2023 at 2:11 AM

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Who did 9/11? https://t.co/n6WM1fYkVn

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, callers discuss a report by Carl Cameron from Fox News about Israeli spying in the United States. The report claims that Israel was tapping phones and secure lines of the FBI, CIA, and White House. It also mentions a team of Israeli intelligence agents posing as art students. The callers express concern about the lack of coverage and the removal of the report from Fox News' website. Cameron confirms the report and explains that it was taken down temporarily due to the influx of war-related news. He also mentions that the documents he used have since been corroborated worldwide. Representative Harmon comments on the deportation of Israeli art students but does not provide specific details.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Los Angeles, good morning. Speaker 1: Good morning. Brian, thank you for your network actually. Mister Wolff, I back in December, Carl Cameron from Fox News ran a 4 part series that Detailed, like a really a massive spying operation by Israel that was that was tapping all the phones in the United States and tapping all the secure lines of the FBI, the CIA, and the White House. Speaker 2: All the phones in the United States? Speaker 1: Yeah. Through through companies that that that Speaker 3: Imagine that transcription effort? Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, of course, it's done with keywords and all that in software. But The other thing was that all the secure lines at the White House and basically the entire federal government, they also said, And this was corroborated in a report released by the DEA that there was a team of art students that were expelled. Actually, it was the largest Spy related expulsion in American history that had teams of intelligence guys, Israeli intelligence guys on the same block. Speaker 3: This this this was a Fox report? Speaker 1: A Fox report by Carl Cameron. It was them. And he they were the only ones that picked it up, although they were rats. Speaker 0: Is that good or bad? Did you believe the report? Speaker 1: Yeah. Oh, yeah. There definitely was a true report. The the local newspaper reports had it and others, but no no one on the air carried except Fox News. And then to make matters worse, Fox News, even on their web, you can go into December archives and look at the port well, actually, you can look at where the report was, Israeli spying or whatever. And they actually pulled it from the archives, and nobody followed up. Speaker 0: Even now Speaker 3: But this is a conspiracy of silence, are you saying? Speaker 1: Well, if you go back to the archives, miss Wolfe, you'll see that it's the only report pulled, the archives go back through, you know, like last year. Speaker 0: Okay. Thanks. Thanks for the call. Speaker 4: Next call for Bill Gertz This comes from Newark, Delaware on our independent line. Good morning. Good morning. Let's see. I was interested in the story Carl Cameron broke 120 Israeli spies that were arrested in the United States shortly after the September incident and Some of the these people had been shadowing the terrorists that that blew up the the buildings, Living in the vicinity and keeping up with them, on May 17th, 2 Israelis were arrested in Washington state in a van that had traces of high explosives. I think it was 5 Israeli military spies, you know, the way they described, were in a building in Brooklyn watching The September bombing. And all of this has been kept out of the press. And I just wonder, I mean, this is good reading. This is what we wanna know about. You know, if Israel supposedly knew and there's stories that their intelligence agency told our government that why isn't that the story? When did we know? What did they know? When did they let us know? Speaker 5: Are you familiar with this story? Speaker 0: Yes. Good questions. As for the 120 Israeli spies, That's a story that's out there. I've looked at that a a little bit. I really haven't found, really what's behind that story. What what is going on there is that there have been a number of Israelis, and, I've actually seen some people come to my house in in Maryland who are selling art, and they identify themselves as students. And there's there's something unusual about it. I have a feeling that this may be collection aspect to it, but I don't see any kind of major effort to to figure out. I know that the US government has Expelled some of these people. You mentioned the May 17th incident on the West Coast. I looked into this very carefully, And this was a story that 2 Israeli nationals were stopped in a rental van near A military I think it was a naval base in Washington state. And, the initial reports were that they had somehow detected some explosives On the steering wheel. And obviously, that's a that's a huge story. Well, I looked into it, and, the word I got from federal officials was that, it was a false indicator that there weren't really explosive traces there. Now, I don't know what to make of it. I'm I'm not out there. If I were out there, perhaps I could get a little bit closer to the story, but, the initial blush on that was the there wasn't anything to it. Speaker 5: Could you go back? You mentioned students selling art. What was the connection again to the Speaker 0: well, that somehow these Israeli art students have been spotted around a number of places, including some federal buildings, and that has raised some counterintelligence concerns within the US government That perhaps the Israelis have been conducting some type of intelligence collection activities. I haven't really been able to Get the all the facts of that story, but I've seen I think he was referring to Carl Cameron's story on Fox News, and he's he's done some good reporting Speaker 4: on it. Speaker 6: But one thing I I really wanna ask you, and I hope you bring it up when Carl Cameron comes on, is that there's a big controversy over a report he did For Fox, on 911. And where he implicated or he suggested, that it was in a 4 part series that that there were a bunch of Israeli art students that were involved in espionage and may have, been following Al Qaeda and There was concern that they were that they didn't report this incident to the American authorities and they were eventually left on Visa violation. They're arrested about a 140 of them. Carl Cameron reported this. There was a big brouhaha, and it was, on Fox's website, and it was taken off of Fox's website. And And it's been a big story in Le Monde. It's been a big story in the Yovantiki and, on big it's been reported in Salon .com. And everywhere you turn and you see the story, the whole thing is always reported about Carl Story and with these oblique quotes about Carl Cameron being puzzled by the strong reaction and everything. So please Asking Speaker 7: how do Speaker 6: you more more, you'll probably have more guests, ask Karl Cameron the same thing. Speaker 7: We've had a number of calls on that as well, and he'll be here in about, 35 minutes. We'll bring it up with him. Silver Spring, Maryland, Republican line for Carl Cameron. Yes. Speaker 8: Yes. Good morning. I'd like to I'm actually, I'm calling to congratulate mister Cameron on his reporting. He broke one of the most, but the most important stories this year with the Israeli spy ring. Problem was that Fox News pulled up the networks almost as soon as they reported it. And, I just like to ask Mr. Cameron how he felt about that and how he feels in general, when, you know, news with a potentially damaging or incriminating evident information against Israel is pulled off almost as soon as it's it's aired. Speaker 7: Thank you. And we should point out, Carl, Cameron, that one of the first calls about an hour and 20 minutes ago dealt with this very issue. First of all, what is the caller talking about and what happened? Speaker 2: In December of last year, FOX did a 4 part series. I reported a 4 part series that described several scenario, several dynamics, within the u within the continental United States. There's a report that was circulated that has now been disclosed by the DEA that reported that over the course of a year and a half, numerous federal agencies had encountered, individuals who refer to themselves as Israeli art students, essentially visiting these facilities, military installations, FBI, DEA, INS, both the publicly listed addresses as well as some that are not made public, and those particular facilities are intended to be kept, secret. And they began to ask questions and attempt to sell their art. And we reported that this was a dynamic that had been described by government documents as a Intelligence gathering operation. Following that particular story, we then described the US intelligence community's grave concerns that Our civilian telecommunications, are compromised and vulnerable to, intelligence gathering because many of the companies that provide services in our telephone calling are are owned by or closely aligned with, Israel and that they have been occasionally investigated by our federal government for tapping or taking information from our telecommunications for the purposes of intelligence. And finally, that there is a concern in our government that the way in which we actually conduct wiretapping, under law enforcement granted judge judge approved surveillance subpoenas, is also potentially vulnerable to compromise and intercept. Excuse me again, Because some of the companies involved with the manufacturing of that equipment are Israeli and that they've never been tested for vulnerabilities, and that too has been investigated as a potential threat. Potential and investigation are the important things to to remember. There is no claim by anybody in our government that the government of Israel or anybody in Israel is actually spying, That these are mysteries, that there is evidence to suggest a problem, and they've yet to been able to solve it. Speaker 7: Did anyone tell you to kill the story? Speaker 2: No. As a matter of fact, what happened was we did put the transcripts of my story on the Internet. And after a period of several days, it was taken down off the Internet, as What I've been told was merely to make available for a huge deluge of war related materials. You gotta remember this was December, So we were still very much in the throes of the September 11th aftermath, and there was, war underway in Afghanistan. And they had to make way for other news, and we've done some follow-up reporting on it. And there is, there has since since our story, which was Which was denounced by the pro Israel lobby in this country as anti Semitic and biased and and inaccurate. Much of what we've reported has now been reported all over the world Because the documents that I used and was careful to protect because some of it was considered classified in secret at the time, have now appeared virtually all over the world corroborating our story and what we reported. Speaker 9: Well, I agree that, talk should continue. Creation of a Palestinian state after the violence has stopped is a laudable goal. I I certainly hope that the Cheney visit it's a productive visit. I think the moderate Arab states have to be working closely with us to find both a way to stop The violence and, an end game that makes sense for everyone in the region, which includes the survival and security And, respect for the state of Israel, which I think is absolutely essential to an essential goal of US Foreign policy and one I strongly support. Speaker 5: And Robert Simpson emails, could you ask representative Harmon about the deportation of Israeli art students Buying in the US and should this worry us? Are you familiar with this issue? Speaker 9: Of Israeli arts, I'm certainly familiar with the fact that we have been rounding up People on student visas and considering whether they might have had anything to do with terrorism and some of those rounded up are Israelis, but I don't know the Specific facts, I would not like to to comment except to say that, I am not in favor of unlimited detention. I voted for the Patriot Act, which Passed the Congress, which put limits on detention. And I think there ought to be court review after 7 days or an appropriate period of time about why it is that we're holding people. And roundups are not things that I think

@sneako - SNEAKO

@LauraLoomer Everyone knows who really did 9/11

Saved - November 8, 2023 at 7:51 PM

@davincentjames - Vincent James

Did you know that over 100,000 Jews held a mock child sacrifice to Moloch during the World’s Fair of Chicago in 1933? Watch this and then Google “what year did the Holocaust start?” https://t.co/hxe5PhcTiV

View Full Interactive Feed