reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @dmills3710

dmills3710
Posted - September 5, 2023 at 2:21 PM
Saved - December 30, 2023 at 1:26 AM

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

#ElectionWatch2020 🗳 #Pennsylvania Amistad Project - Thomas Moore Society: “When he was finished, the vote count shut up by 50,000 votes for VP Biden. 47 USB cards were missing at the end of week. As of today that number is reportedly grown to 64” https://t.co/kFKXrEjxhC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Disturbing breaches of protocol were observed during the election. USB vCard drives from voting machines were mixed together with cartridges and paper tapes, destroying any chance of forensic auditability and compromising the chain of custody. Despite objections, an individual plugged unsecured USB cards into vote counting computers, resulting in a sudden increase of 50,000 votes for Vice President Biden. Initially, 47 USB cards were missing, but that number has reportedly grown to 64. Additionally, a room containing 60,000 to 70,000 unopened mail-in ballots was discovered days after the vote count, with no knowledge of their origin or whereabouts. The absence of signed chain of custody documents raises questions about the source and destination of these ballots.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There were disturbing breaches of protocol taking place in plain sight. At one point, I saw unsecured USB vCard drives from voting machines being separated from their accompanying cartridges and paper tapes and commingled together by election workers. These actions destroyed any forensic auditability and corrupted the chain of custody. Formal objections to election officials and law enforcement officers that were present went unanswered. In unsealed bags of unsecured USB card drives, which he inexplicably proceeded to plug into computers, the vote counting computers, and upload into the official vote tally. Despite formal objections to senior law enforcement that was present and election board officials, he was allowed to continue. When he was finished, the vote count shot up by 50,000 votes for vice president Biden. 47 USB cards were missing at the end of last suite. As of today, that number has reportedly grown to 64. When I finally gained access to the sequestered room, this is 3 days later, where mail in ballots were ingested, I witnessed 60 to 70,000 unopened mail in BLM ballots and sequestered back offices. That was on Thursday at 3:30 after the vote was supposedly counted. They remain unaccounted for. We don't know where they are. All signed paper chain of custody documents are missing despite attempts by democrat election officials to recreate them. My questions then and now remain, where do the ballots come from? Where do these mail in ballots come from? And where do they go?
dmills3710
Posted - June 21, 2019 at 2:54 PM
Saved - December 23, 2023 at 4:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Seth Rich's downloading of hundreds of thousands of emails alerted government agencies to an intrusion in the system. Person G, a computer forensic expert, was part of the "dirty tricks squad" conducting illegal surveillance. Hillary Clinton's servers were compromised, and the squad altered and disseminated classified information. Mueller, Comey, and Brennan were involved under Obama's direction. The DoD discovered Seth Rich's involvement and prevented him from accessing more information.

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

Anonymous V7 (AV7) Firsthand Account: March -June 2019 The Events Surrounding Murder of Seth Rich, DNC Employee, July 10, 2016▫️ “When Seth Rich used his position to download well over half a million emails it set off some bells & whistles... @POTUS @GenFlynn @SidneyPowell1

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“These emails were between government officials at certain classification levels, these email chains, while on inappropriate servers, were nevertheless exchanged between people with the proper clearance levels. When Seth Rich downloaded hundreds of thousands of emails...”

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“and images, he broke hundreds of these email chains. This alerted certain government agencies to an intrusion in the system, it also set off alarms that Person G had installed to protect the illegal surveillance they were doing.”

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“This goes back to the “dirty tricks squad” and Person F & the illegal surveillance they were conducting on many people.” “Person G worked for the Secret Service as a computer forensic expert. He was so goodie worked for CIA, NSA, FBI & many others by request. I knew him for...”

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“many years & his wife’s family for years before that. He was a key figure of the “dirty tricks squad”. Person F knew that FBI/DOJ had been conducting illegal surveillance on many people for years. On judges, federal judges. Hillary Clinton especially political adversaries...”

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“these are the same things they exploited for the coup information leading up to the election with Donald Trump.” “Well, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Servers have been compromised by Person G & the squad approximately two months after she had them installed...”

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“There were actually four or five separate servers Clinton used to send & receive classified emails. They were all compromised.” “They began by just recording info then they began to alter & disseminate it to other different departments; to Person F, dirty tricks squad...”

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“& initially Mueller, then Comey & Brennan under the direction of Obama. They were illegally surveillance compromising federal judges, political rivals & anyone else who got in their way.”

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“The DoD began investigation where it was discovered that the DoD was going to pick up Seth Rich for questioning. At this time Person G was already incarcerated for committing fraud but his security software that was still in place. Person F, Mueller & Comey they could not...”

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“allow Seth Rich to send the information out to anyone or get access to more of it. The amount that he took the first time if it was examined it would have shown what they were doing as far as modifying information access systems, blackmailing people, illegal stuff.”

dmills3710
Posted - December 5, 2019 at 4:14 AM
Saved - December 14, 2023 at 11:56 PM

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

@FBI Pressured Source To Not Speak To Press About Biden Corruption - Former FBI Agent Karen Greenaway Ran the Deep State Effort to #CoverUp Alleged Biden Family Corruption▫️ https://creativedestructionmedia.com/investigations/2019/11/07/breaking-fbi-pressured-source-to-not-speak-to-press-about-biden-corruption/

FLASHBACK: FBI Pressured Source To Not Speak To Press About Biden Corruption - CDM - Human Reporters • Not Machines BREAKING: FBI Pressured Source To Not Speak To Press About Biden Corruption. Retired Agent Karen Greenaway Led Effort. creativedestructionmedia.com
dmills3710
Posted - December 10, 2023 at 7:05 PM
Saved - December 13, 2023 at 2:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Signal, a popular messaging app, has been linked to the CIA. The US State Department, under Hillary Clinton, launched the 'Open Technology Fund' to develop tools for internet freedom. However, a 2011 investigation revealed its true purpose: creating shadow internet systems to undermine repressive governments. Signal is often recommended alongside Tor, an anonymizing browser. Tor has been predominantly funded by the US government. These connections raise questions about Signal's independence and potential implications.

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

Meticulously detailed report on how Signal is funded by the CIA: https://kitklarenberg.substack.com/p/signal-facing-collapse-after-cia

Signal Facing Collapse After CIA Cuts Funding On November 16th, Meredith Whittaker, President of Signal, published a detailed breakdown of the popular encrypted messaging app’s running costs for the very first time. The unprecedented disclosure’s motivation was simple - the platform is rapidly running out of money, and in dire need of donations to stay afloat. Unmentioned by Whittaker, this budget shortfall results in large part due to the US intelligence community, which lavishly financed Signal’s creation and maintenance over several years, severing its support for the app. kitklarenberg.substack.com

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

‘Taking Down Governments’ “Launch of ‘Open Technology Fund’ followed US State Dept, then led by Hillary Clinton, adopting policy known as “Internet Freedom”. Ostensibly, this was an effort to develop tools to circumvent restrictions on internet access & usage overseas.

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

2011 NYT investigation concluded endeavor was in fact concerned with “[deploying] ‘shadow’ internet & mobile phone systems dissidents can use to undermine repressive governments.”

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“Anonymizing, “dark web” browser Tor, frequently recommended by privacy advocates in the same breath as Signal. First developed by US Naval Research Laboratory in the mid-1990s, it quickly caught the attention of the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“Since then, Tor has been almost entirely funded by US government entities. Strikingly, it features alongside Signal in the aforementioned USAGM factsheet…”

dmills3710
Posted - August 4, 2023 at 12:21 AM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 2:23 AM

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

Annual Report of State Child Welfare Expenditure:

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

Graphs Are Good But Try Finding How Much $$ Was Actually Spent In This MAZE: Annual Report of State Child Welfare Expenditures https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/report/annual-report-state-child-welfare-expenditures

Annual Report of State Child Welfare Expenditures Each year, the Children's Bureau produces the Annual Report to Congress on State Child Welfare Expenditures Reported on the CFS-101s. acf.hhs.gov
dmills3710
Posted - December 1, 2023 at 10:12 PM
Saved - December 1, 2023 at 10:48 PM

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

Cyber Threat Intelligence League:

@RobGouveiaEsq - Robert Gouveia Esq.

Details about a "military-grade" censorship operation were revealed during a Congressional hearing featuring journalists @shellenberger and @mtaibbi. During testimony, we learned about the inner workings of an organization called CTIL, the "Cyber Threat Intelligence League" and how they operated to infiltrate aspects of the United States Government with the purpose of censoring Americans.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a congressional hearing, Michael Schellenberger and Matt Taibbi revealed details about the Cyber Threats Intelligence League (CTIL), a powerful organization involved in censoring free speech. They presented evidence of a censorship industrial complex, involving government agencies, contractors, and big tech platforms, that censors ordinary Americans and elected officials for holding disfavored views. The CTIL files exposed US and UK military contractors working to censor and conduct psychological operations against the American people. They also discussed the violation of the First Amendment by government agencies and the need for defunding and dismantling these organizations involved in censorship. The hearing highlighted the dangers of government-sponsored censorship and the importance of protecting free speech.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A military grade censorship operation has been under effect for quite some time and we learn about that in a congressional hearing with Michael Schellenberger, Matt Taibbi, and others in Congress. And they reveal some details for us about this organization called CTIL, c t I l, the Cyber Threats Intelligence League. Very powerful and Scary. But it's a pretty serious organization because they're censoring a lot of free protected speech in our country and elsewhere. And so we're gonna go through the actual report that Schellenberger dropped on the x platform. But first, we're gonna hear from him. He gave a nice opening statement issuing a very serious warning for all of us to heed. And Matt Taibbi follows up with an opening statement, and we're gonna hit some highlights from this testimony from Dan Goldman from the left, who I think is now officially a Hunter Biden conspiracy theorist. And Jim Jordan, who brings in the part about conspiracy theorist, and Jim Jordan who brings in the part about censorship. And so this is what Michael Shellenberger said as the hearing in of the weaponization committee got underway today. Speaker 1: 9 months ago, I testified and provided evidence to the subcommittee about the existence of a censorship industrial Complex, a network of government agencies including the Department of Homeland Security, government contractors, and big tech media platforms that conspired to censor ordinary Americans and elected officials alike for holding disfavored views. I regret to inform the subcommittee today that the scope, power and law breaking of the censorship industrial complex are even worse than we had realized back in March. 2 days ago, my colleagues and I published the 1st batch of internal files from the Cyber Threat Intelligence League, which show US and UK military contractors. Speaker 0: We're gonna read this. Speaker 1: Working in 2019 and 2020 to both censor and turn sophisticated psychological operations and disinformation tactics what? Developed abroad against the American people. Many insist that all that we identified in the Twitter files, the Facebook files, and the CTI files were legal activities by social media platforms to take down content that violated the terms of service. Facebook x, formerly Twitter, and other big tech companies are privately owned, people point out and free to censor content. And government officials are free to point out wrong information, they argue. But the first amendment prohibits the government from abridging freedom of speech. Supreme Court has ruled that the government may not induce, encourage, or promote private persons to accomplish what is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish. And there's now a large body of evidence proving that the government did precisely that. What's more, the whistleblower who delivered the CTIL files to us says that its leader, a quote unquote former British intelligence analyst, was quote unquote in the room at the Obama White House in 2017 when she received the instructions to create a counter disinformation project to, quote, stop a repeat of 2016. Woah. The US Department of Homeland Security Cybersecurity and Information Security Agency, CISA, has been the center of gravity for much of the censorship with the National Science Foundation financing the development of censorship information tools, and other federal government agencies playing a supportive role. Emails from CISA's NGO and social media partners show that CISA created the Election Integrity Partnership, EIP, in 2020, which involved the Stanford Internet Observatory and other US government contractors. EIP and its successor, Virality Project, urged Twitter, Facebook, and other platforms to censor social media posts by ordinary citizens and elected officials alike. EIP reported that they had a 75% response rate from the platforms and that 35% of the URLs that they reported were either removed, labeled, Or throttled or soft blocked. In 2020, the Department of Homeland Security's CISA violated the First Amendment and interfered in the election, while in 2021, CISA and the White House violated the First Amendment and undermined America's response to the COVID pandemic by demanding that Facebook and Twitter censor content that Facebook itself said was, quote, unquote, often true, including about vaccine side effects. All of this is profoundly un American. One's commitment to free speech means nothing if it does not extend to your political enemies. In his essential new book, Liar in a Crowded Theater, Jeff Koseff, a law professor at the United States Naval Academy, shows that the widespread view that the government can censor false speech and or speech that, quote unquote, causes harm is mostly wrong. Supreme Court has allowed very few constraints on speech. For example, the test of incitement to violence remains its immediacy. I encourage congress to defund and dismantle the government organizations involved in censorship. That includes phasing out all funding for the National Science Foundation's TRAC f, trust and authenticity in communication systems, and its secure and trustworthy cyberspace track. I would also encourage congress to abolish CISA in DHS. Short of taking those steps, I would encourage significant guardrails and oversight to prevent such censorship from happening again. In particular, it's very easy to see the line in CISA. They say they're covering physical security, cyber security, but they added a third one, cognitive security, which is basically attempting to control the information environment and how people think about the world, including the stories that they tell. Speaker 0: Control us. Speaker 1: Finally, I would encourage congress to consider making section 230 liability protections contingent on social media platforms known in the law's interactive computer services to allow adult users to moderate our own legal content through filters that we choose and whose algorithms are transparent to all of us, I would encourage congress to prohibit government officials from asking the platforms to remove content which the Supreme Court may or may not rule unconstitutional next year when it decides on the Missouri v Biden case, should the court somehow decide that the government requests for censorship are constitutional, then I would urge congress to require such requests be reported publicly instantaneously Lee. So that such censorship demands occur in plain sight. Thank you very much for hearing my testimony. Speaker 0: Alright. Very shocking and scary revelations there. We are up against some very powerful actors, global efforts with 1,000,000, if not 1,000,000,000 of dollars and decades of structure behind them so that 2016 doesn't happen again. And we all felt it, by the way. I remember what 2016 felt like on the Internet. I remember what 2020 felt like on the Internet, and they were censoring and suppressing us hard in 2020 and in the year before that. So it was a night and day operation. I mean, the thing worked. Right? They suppressed a bunch of people. And so the amount of energy that we're gonna have to bring this next election, the amount of enthusiasm, we're gonna have to drag 5 people to the polls with us. Wake up. We're going voting today. We have to become stronger to buttress this effort. So let's take a look at the actual files that he's talking about because it is pretty disgusting, this is the report from Michael Schellenberger, highly recommended follow at Schellenberger on the x platform. And he tells us, now many people insist that the government isn't involved in censorship, but they are. And now whistleblower has come forward. Here's the post. C t I l files version 1 tells us the US and the UK military contractors created a sweeping plan for global censorship in 2018. A whistleblower made this known. Says the whistleblower has come forward with an explosive new trove of documents rivaling or exceeding the Twitter files, the Facebook files, the cyber threat intelligence elite, not a Marvel film, but certainly filled with evil actors, says that officially began as the volunteer project of data scientists. Just scientists. Some of the worst, and defense and intelligence veterans, but whose tactics over time appear to have been absorbed into multiple official projects including homeland security. Now the CTI League documents offer the missing link answers to the key questions that were not addressed in the Twitter files and the Facebook files. Combined, they offer a comprehensive picture of the birth of the anti disinformation sector and the censorship apparatus. Now the whistleblower's documents describe everything from the genesis of the digital censorship programs to how they partnered with sock puppet accounts to offer offensive techniques. So they were silencing people and creating fake sock puppet accounts. One document says, quote, lock your stuff down, explains 1 document about creating your spy disguise. Lock your stuff down. Another document says that while such activities overseas are, quote, typically done by the CIA and the NSA and the DOD, censorship efforts, quote, against Americans have to be done using private partners because the government doesn't have legal authority. See how that works? CIA can go do it on their own. The government can just do it overseas, but they gotta use a third party provider to do it. So the whistleblower says that the leader of the CTI League, a former, quote, British intelligence analyst, was quote in the room when Obama was there to stop a repeat of 2016. Team. So over the last year, congressional investigators and others, they have uncovered a network of over 100 government agencies and nongovernmental organizations who worked together to do this. DHS, CISA, all created an organization in 2020. They called it the Election Integrity Partnership, which involved Stanford Internet Observatory and US government contractors, the Virality Project and others, they urged Twitter and Facebook and others to censor social media posts. Now despite overwhelming evidence of government sponsored censorship, it had yet to be determined where the idea for this mass censorship regime came from. But now we know. In 2018, an SIO official and former CIA fellow called Rene de Resista generated national headlines before and after testifying to the US Senate about government interference in 2000 Dean. But what happened between 2018 and spring 2020? Well, the year 2019 has been a black hole in the research of the censorship industrial complex. When one of us, Michael, testified to the US House of Representatives about the censorship industrial complex of March of this year, the entire year was missing from his timeline. But now a large trove of documents, including strategy documents, training videos, presentations, and internal messages revealed that in 2019, US an UK military and intelligence contractors led by a former UK defense researcher called Sarah Jane, s j Terp, developed a sweeping censorship framework. And these contractors co led SITOL, which partnered with CISA in the spring of 2020. Now in truth, they say, the building of the censorship industrial complex began even earlier in 2018. Internal Slack messages show that woman, Terp, and her colleagues, and officials from DHS and Facebook all work closely together in the process. The CITL framework and the public private model are the seeds of what both the US and the UK would put into place back in 2020 and 2021. They would mask their censorship and their cybersecurity institutions and their counter information agendas with a heavy focus on stopping disfavored narratives, not just wrong facts, and pressuring social media platforms to take down information or take other actions to prevent content from going viral. Now in the spring of 2020, Siddle began tracking and reporting this favored content on social media, such as anti lockdown narratives, quote, like all jobs are essential, which this show was birthed in the spring of 2020. That's why we started it, because they were wrecking the country. We couldn't stand for it. All jobs are essential. We won't stay home. Open America now. CITL created a law enforcement channel for reporting content as part part of these efforts. The organization also did research on individuals posting anti lockdown hashtags like free k c a, free a z, and kept a spreadsheet with details from their Twitter bios like little whiny censors. The group also discussed requesting takedowns and reporting website domains to registrars. Seadl's approach to this info went far beyond they engaged in offensive operations to influence public opinion. They discussed ways to promote counter messaging on how to co opt hashtags, on how to dilute his favored messaging, create sock puppet accounts, and infiltrate private only individual groups. In one suggested list of survey questions, SEDL proposed asking members and potential members, have you worked with influence operations before? Have you done active measures? Have you done psyops before? Now the documents came from a highly credible whistleblower, but we were able to independently verify their legitimacy through extensive cross checking of information to publicly available sources. The whistleblower said that they were recruited to participate in situl through the monthly cybersecurity meetings hosted by DHS. Now the FBI declined to comment, obviously. CISA did not respond to our request for comment. And Turpin and other key Cecil leaders also did not respond to Emma. But one person involved, this person called Bonnie Smalley, replied over LinkedIn saying, all I can comment on is that I joined the CTI League, which is unaffiliated with any government organizations because I wanted to combat the inject bleach nonsense, which was a fake hoax, during COVID. I can assure you that we had nothing to do with the government though. Yeah. Right. Now yet the documents suggest that the government employees were engaged members of Cecil. Government employees were engaged members of Cecil. Now it wasn't officially a government organization, but, of course, we know that they were involved. Now 1 individual who worked for DHS, Justin Frappier was extremely active in Seattle, participating in regular meetings and leading trainings. You see this email here, or this is from the Slack channel. Covid 19 CTI League. They're like avengers. They're like disinformation avengers. We're Lee. Yeah. Here, they shared this one, disinformation triage. Oh, my gosh. These people are just something else. So disinformation triage, s j Terp says here, reading group in just over a big book says that we're on books Tom has read active measures chapters. Oh, that's good. They're reading active measures chapters, I guess or is she sharing a post? I told my doctor, so much work to do. I know a lot of medical field people was added. This person, Justin Frappier, disinformation team, information team incident management team. He's added to the group. Justin Frappier drops this message. He says, LOL, hello from the other side. He's a government official. Sounds like. Yeah. There he is. Various government official. He works for DHS, who worked for them, was very active there. Now their ultimate goal, said the whistleblower, was, quote, to become a part of the federal government. In our weekly meetings, they made it clear that they were building these organizations within the federal government. And if you build the 1st iteration, we could secure a job for you. Now Terp's plan, which she shared in presentations to information security and cybersecurity groups in 2019, was to create misinformation communities that would include the government. Now both public records and whistleblower documents suggest that she achieved this. In April 2020, Chris Krebs, then director of CISA, announced on Twitter Aziza was partnering with Sitzel. It's really an information exchange. No. You're outsourcing your censorship. Now the documents also show that Terp and her colleagues through a group of Miss Infosec working group, which included DiResta, created a censorship influence and anti disinformation strategy called Adversarial Misinformation and Influence Tactics and Techniques, Amit. They wrote Amit by adapting a cybersecurity framework developed by Mitra, a major defense and intelligence contractor that has an annual budget of 1 to $2,000,000,000. Terp then used the military framework to develop the disarm framework, which the WHO then employed encountering anti jab info across Europe. Now a key component of her work through SITIL, MisinfoSec, Amit, was to insert the concept of cognitive Churity into the fields of cybersecurity and information security. In sum, they tell us that the total of these documents is a clear picture of a highly coordinated and sophisticated effort by the US and the UK governments to build a domestic censorship effort and to influence operations similar to the ones that they have used in foreign countries. At one point, Turt openly referenced, quote, her work in the background on social media issues related to the Arab Spring. Another time, the whistleblower said that she expressed her own apparent surprise that she whatever used such tactics against the American citizens. I can't believe we're doing this. But Trump, according to the whistleblower, roughly 12 to 20 active people involved in SITL worked at the FBI or CISA. For a while, they had their agency seals next to your name. Okay? FBI, CISA, whatever. Ever. They just put the info the name seal next to your name. Terp had a CISA badge that went away at some point. They took those off like, oops, maybe we shouldn't do that. Now the ambitions of the 2020 pioneers Ears went far beyond simply urging Twitter to warn stuff. The framework calls for the discrediting of individuals, necessary prerequisite for demanding censorship against them. You don't just ban their posts. You have to wreck them. It calls for training influencers to spread messages. It calls for trying to get banks to cut off financial services to individuals who organize rallies and events. The timeline of CISA's work with SITL, leading up to its work with the EIP and the VP, strongly suggests that the model for public private censorship may have originated with a framework originally created for military contractors coming out against us. Now what's more, the techniques and the materials outlined by Sittel closely resemble materials later created by CISA's countering foreign intelligence task force and the mis, dis, and malinformation team. Now over the next several days weeks, they say, we intend to present these documents to congress. We're gonna make them all publicly available and show you what's happening. But for now, we need to take a closer look at what happened in 2018, 2019, and beyond. Here are some of the forms that they were able to gather up. So here's the information environment. You have the physical dimension. Right? This is anti misinformation military type frameworks that they are deploying to censor us on a grand scale across the whole country. The information environment. Well, we've got the physical dimension, obviously, where the information environment overlaps with the physical world. We talk about this often on our member streams, the world of atoms versus the world of bits, a Peter Thiel concept. Information systems and networks. Key characteristics. We've got computers, communication systems, supporting infrastructure, and so on. Then we've got the information dimension. So we got the physical apparatus and the information layer. Information is collected, disseminated. It's got dual nature. Information is itself and it's the medium. Information content in the flow where automated decision making takes place, and then the most nefarious, the cognitive dimension that needs to be secured, where human decision making takes place. In your brain, dimensions of the intangibles. What do they need to impact? Morale, unit cohesion, public opinion, situational awareness. Key characteristics, perceptions, emotions, awareness, and understanding. They need to get involved in that. So they published all sorts of stories saying that they were just volunteer cybersecurity experts Bertsch, and former Israeli intelligence and Microsoft security manager. Now these articles claim that these highly skilled professionals just decided to help $1,000,000,000 hospitals all on their own time. But apparently, they'd grown to 1400 members in 76 countries. They helped to lawfully take down 28100, quote, cyber criminal assets. At every opportunity, they were removing stories. Now Terp and Pablo, other leaders, they had backgrounds as former military contractors. And according to her bio, she also designed machine learning algorithms on aerial systems for the UK Ministry of Fentz. So these people are smart people. Brewer is a former US Navy commander. According to his bio, he also was a senior military adviser innovation officer at Softworks naval central command. He's got the creation of SITL on his LinkedIn page. In 2018, Terp attended a 10 day military exercise organized by US Special Operations Command, where she first met Brewer and others. Now they admitted on a podcast that her aim was to bring military tactics to use on social media platforms, Brewer said, I wear 2 hats. The military director of the Donovan Group and Softworks, which is completely unclassified nonprofit. Here's the countermeasures framework, which is just incredible. Okay. So this is what they do every time there's misinformation. Planning, have a disinformation response plan, improve stakeholder communication, make civil society more vibrant, red team disinformation, design mitigations as soon as something hits, platform regulation, etcetera, at the bottom on all of these columns, objective planning, tabletop simulations, media literacy through games, educate influencers, legal action against for profit engagement farms. Right? Take them out. These are what these people are planning to silence your participation in the next election, how dare your cognitive framework deviate from their defined narrative? Here's how they're gonna prepare. They're gonna find and train influencers. What? They're going to remove old and unused accounts. They're going to fill information voids, stem the flow of advertising money. We got demonetized for 9 months after January 6th. 9 months. They just demonetized the whole channel. Sorry. You're done. Yeah. And that can take out somebody, man. So it was a big big hit. It was a big hit. Fortunately, I had a law firm at the time. So stem flow of advertising money. Right? It's Critical. They're doing it again. You're seeing them demonetize people and and nuke people. Honeypot social community. Oh, gosh. So that they can just catalog everybody. Here, rate limit engagement redirect searches away from this info so they can just take your search away. Honeypot, a fake engagement system. Okay, so, like, be cognizant out there. Like, when you're traveling around talking to people, bots to engage and distract the trolls. Like, this is military this is military grade tactics, probably with AI, ChatGPT, LLMs all over the place. Strengthen verification methods, verified IDs, prohibit images in political channels, add metadata, add warning labels, infiltrate disinformation platforms, social media source removals, infiltrate in groups, infiltrate. Are you guys watching here, you sit down punks? I hope you're learning something. Hope you're taking notes out there. Name and shame disinformation influencers. Maybe charge them with crimes, maybe arrest them. Ensure platforms are taking down accounts. Marginalized and discredit extremist groups, ban incident actors from funding sites, countering social engineering training. Wilde. Okay. So this is what our military is doing. And then also, in the execution, let's see what else. Pump priming, they say. Micro target, likely targets with counter messages, trained journalists, I'm sure they've got a bunch of them, trained journalists to counter influence moves, tool transparency, ask the media not to report the false info which they'll oblige, repurpose images with counter messages, so steal your content and reuse it, engage in payloads, don't engage in payloads, hashtag jacking, social media Amber alerts, remove and rate limit bots, cut off banking access. These people cut off your banking access so that you can't access your money. Wild. Influencer disavows misinfo, expire likes and retweets, mark content with ridicule and decelerates. Ridicule the other side. Humorous counternarratives. Okay? This is stuff that we do here. You know, we lampoon the other side. It's very effective. And they'd make it easy, is why they have to silence us. Like, these are some of the things that we do to mock and hammer them, and so they need military operations to counter this. Right? Satire, ridicule lampooning. These are the tools that are 1000 of years old. Right? We've been doing this since the dawn of time, ridiculing and lampooning the people in charge. But they wanna use those same tactics because they wanna silence you. Now, we're just a live stream. Okay? This is the military. Alright. They've got go physical. Don't even know what that means. They don't have anything under there. They probably that one off the chart for a reason. Go physical. Don't know what that means. And persistence. DMCA takedown requests. Spam domestic actors with lawsuits. Look at that, man. Spam domestic actors with lawsuits. It's an official tactic. Scary stuff. And seize and analyze botnet servers. Right? And this is happening to certain people. Like, for example, you can say, this is like a weaponized tactic. Like, they're going after like Hunter is using some of these tactics. Right? Going after Garrett Ziegler and those guys, and Marco Polo USA. I here, evaluation. They also wanna poison monitoring and evaluation data, whatever that means. Poison the monitoring and evaluation data. And they wanna bomb link shorteners with calls, add random links to network graphs. These are people just wrecking the Internet for their own, you know, purpose, wrecking free speech. And it is a government private partnership. All in the interest of securing their narratives. Yeah. It's really really Gusting. So as we carry on, this is what else they've got for us. Here, they have attackers and defenders. We've got some tools here artifacts, narratives, incidents, and campaigns. And I actually don't like this color coordination. I don't think it's a bad slide. But here, all of this, Brewer went on to describe how they got around the First Amendment. He says he worked with Terp, he explained. This was a way to get nontraditional media partners into one room. They reported sweeping government censorship Chip during the 1st 6 months of 2019, they analyzed incidents, numerous reporting systems. In every incident mentioned, the victims of misinformation were victims were on the political left. Wow. Included Obama, Podesta, Hillary, and Macron. Wait a minute. The report was open about the fact that its motivation for counter information were the twin political earthquakes of two 1016, Brexit and the election of Trump. They said the victims of misinformation were on the left. Right? So we have to stop the misinformation to protect Obama, Emma Podesta, Hillary, and Macron. Now a study of the antecedents said that we have to stop the usual useful idiots. Now it's our brains that are being hacked, and we have to focus on information that quote changes beliefs and changes narratives. Now the report laments that the government and corporate media, they no longer have full control of information. Here's what the report says. For a long time, the ability to reach mass audiences belonged to the nation state. In the USA, we we had broadcast licensing through ABC, CBS, and NBC. The government controlled the message. Now, however, control of information and informational instruments has been allowed to devolve to large technology companies. And they've been blissfully complacent in facilitating access to public information by other means. Yeah. We have shows like Fisk. The authors advocated for police, military, and intelligence involvement including the Five Eyes Nations and Interpol to suggest that we need a new framework to stop this. We also need prebunking prebunking to preemptively inoculate a vulnerable population to the messaging. Now the view of disinformation was overtly political. They said most misinformation is actually true, says Terp. But it's set in the wrong context. Now she's an eloquent explainer of the strategy of using anti disinformation. Says you're not trying to get people to believe lies most of the time. You're just trying to make them change their belief sets. And so the in group now somebody else says this is a violation of our First Amendment. And this is I mean, the report goes on, and you can see here, they were flagging these. Right? No more lockdowns. You got flagged for misinformation. You have an alerting. You have an organization process. You have a collection process. And you have an action process. All working to silence all of us. Here's the timeline, they created and established the mission statement. They worked their papers. They created a techniques list. They refined the protocols. They had a black hat presentation. They had different population counters list, blue team workshops, and so on. An entire censorship industrial complex focused on us. Focused on our participation. Sick things that are happening. So that is the SITL files version 1. We heard from Michael Schellenberger. Matt Taibbi gives us his opening statement. He's also been participating in this inquiry. Here's what he sounds like. Speaker 2: Thank you, chairman Jordan, ranking member of Plasquette, members of the committee for giving us the opportunity to speak today. Exactly 1 year ago today, I had my first look at the documents that came to be known as the Twitter files. We've learned a lot since then. When Michael and I testified before the people of this committee in March, we both talked about how this isn't a partisan issue at all despite the fact that it's been repeatedly described as a right wing conspiracy theory or or a right wing fantasy, we found evidence of suppression and movements on both sides, including leftist movements like the yellow vests, Parties with the Green Party, organizations like Consortium Magazine. Just this week, Michael and I reported on the group that he the CTI League. In those documents, we found evidence of monitoring groups like the Democratic Socialists of America, hashtags like health care for all. The nature of censorship programs is that they tend to expand in all directions, and these programs already have. As someone who voted for Democrats his whole life and who got his ideas about speech issues from people like senator Frank Church, Paul Wellstone, Dennis Kucinich. Speaker 0: Kucinich used to be a free speech hero for the left. He was ranting about government censorship. Speaker 2: I believe also that there's a less obvious but more important reason that people across the spectrum should hear about this issue. The former executive director of the ACLU, Ira Glasser, once explained to a group of students why he didn't support hate speech codes on campuses. The problem he said wasn't the speech. The problem was, quote, who gets to decide what's hateful? Who gets to decide what to ban? Because, quote, most of the time, The story that came out in the Twitter files and for which more evidence surfaced in both Missouri v Biden lawsuit and this committee's Facebook filed releases and the CTI lead documents. They all speak directly to Ira Glasser's concerns. There's been a dramatic shift in attitudes about speech in this country, and many politicians now clearly believe the bulk of Americans can't be trusted to digest information on their own. This mindset imagines that if we see 1 clip from RT, we'll stop being patriots. That once exposed to hate speech will become bigots ourselves automatically. Speaker 0: Right. We're too dumb. Speaker 2: That if we read even 1 Donald Trump tweet, we'll become insurrectionists. America. Having come to this conclusion, the government agencies like the DHS and the FBI and the quasi private agencies who do anti disinformation work taken upon themselves the paternalistic responsibility to sort out for us what is and is not safe. While they see great danger in allowing others to read controversial material, it's taken for granted, they themselves will be immune to the dangers of speech. This leads to the one inescapable question about these new anti disinformation programs that is never discussed But needs to be. Who does this work? Stanford's Election Integrity Project helpfully made a graphic showing the, quote, unquote, external stakeholders involved in their content review operation. It showed 4 columns, government, civil society, platforms, and media. There's 1 group that's conspicuously absent from that list, people, ordinary people. Whether America continues the informal sub rows of censorship system we've seen in the Twitter files or the Facebook files Or whether it formally adopt something like Europe's draconian New Digital Services Act. It's already abundantly clear who won't be involved in this kind of work. We know dock workers doing content flagging. No poor people from inner city neighborhoods. No single moms pulling multiple waitressing jobs. No immigrant store owners or Uber drivers, these programs will always feature a tiny, rarefied sliver of affluent professional class Americans Censoring a huge and ever expanding pool of everyone else. Take away the highfalutin talk about countering hate and reducing harm. Any of this information is just Bluntly elitist gatekeeping exercise. If you prefer to think in progressive terms, it's class war. If 1 small demographic over here his broad control over the whole speech landscape, and a great big one over there has no control whatsoever. It follows that one of those groups will end up with more political power than the other. Speaker 0: That's as the point Which Speaker 2: one is the winner? Paraphrase, our Glasser, it probably ain't yours. It isn't just one side or the other that will lose if these programs are allowed to continue. Pretty much everyone, which is why these programs must be defunded before it's too late. Thank you very much. Speaker 0: Yeah. I agree, man. And I this is for everybody. Like, free speech is a natural, god given, humanitarian right. It's how we become and embrace our humanity. Our ability to think and reason our consciousness is communicated through our speech. And they wanna censor that. It's anti human. It's not good for the left, even if they think it's good for them. You know, it's like a kid. It's like you can't eat all the ice cream. K? You can't censor everybody. It's not good for you. You're gonna wreck the whole planet, idiots. So here's Dan Goldman, one of them, who can't figure this out who just turns around and turns us into a Hunter Biden conspiracy theory conversation. We're talking about government military grade censorship, and this whack job is he's talking about Hunter Biden. And he's a conspiracy theorist now with the rest of us. Speaker 3: You've talked about the Hunter Biden laptop and how the FBI knew it existed. Speaker 0: And suppressed it. Speaker 3: You are aware, of course, that the laptop, so to speak, was actually that was published in the New York Post was actually a hard drive that the New York Post admitted here was not authenticated as real. It was not the laptop the FBI had. You're aware of that. Speaker 1: Right? It was the same contents. How do you know? Because it's the same I mean, it's Speaker 3: just the same to know it was the same content. Speaker 4: You have no idea. Speaker 1: You need to conspiracy. Manipulated it? Are you suggesting The New York Post participate in a conspiracy to construct the contents of the Hunter Biden laptop? Speaker 3: No, sir. The problem is that hard drives can be manipulated by Rudy Giuliani or both evidence that that happened? Speaker 1: With Facebook. Well, there Speaker 3: is actual evidence of it. But the point is it's not fair to say that. Speaker 4: So you're engaged in a conspiracy theory. Speaker 3: I'm glad you agree with me, mister Schellenberg, that Parentcy is the most important thing. And my last question for you is do you think it would be transparent if Hunter Biden came to this Congress and testified in a public hearing and more transparent than if he testified privately. Speaker 1: I mean, literally, I've never thought about that. I have no idea. Speaker 0: I'm not here for this. Speaker 1: You know never thought about that. Speaker 3: Public testimony, more choices than random testimony? Speaker 1: Are you familiar with the 1st amendment? Yield back. Congress shall take no action to abridge freedom of speech. Yeah. And that's what you just described. Speaker 4: Mister Schellen. Speaker 0: There you go. I mean, Dan, I don't know what he's talking about. He's like, what the heck? Where are we, man? Why are you talking about Hunter? You weird Freak. Alright. This is Jim Jordan now, who's gonna close it out. And they're all trying to justify censure Like, I don't know why censorship is not a universal thing. Actually, I do know why. It's because they use it to win. Because they can't compete in the regular arena of ideas. They have to censor their opponents because they're bullies, cheaters, and liars. And so this is what Shellenberger says when Jim Jordan is asking about this, because the response from the left was, well, they didn't censor everything. Like, there was only, like, a certain percentage and like 13% censorship is not that bad. Speaker 4: Mister Shellenberger, is 13% censorship still censorship? Absolutely. And the other 87% is what we call the chilling effect that the courts have long recognized that they engaged in. That is the problem. Speaker 1: There's a broad up by the way, part of the operation, congress Colvin, part of the operation was to change the terms of service. So you see them constantly trying to change the terms of service. You see them, it was 35% of the URLs that were this went to EIP were labeled, removed, or soft blocked. That's all forms of censorship. That censorship is not just removed. General lady Speaker 3: But 65% were not. So how can the government be so coercive? Speaker 1: Does the first amendment think that's about par for the course the government officials. Say the government can censor Tyler, Speaker 4: they're dialing. They're flagging Speaker 3: in the social media companies. Speaker 1: This is what they're doing. Speaker 2: 35% of the first amendment or Speaker 3: It's not the first amendment. It's the terms of service as you said, and they are flagging it for the social media companies to make their own decisions. That is not the 1st amended. That is the terms of service. Speaker 4: We have just seen Speaker 2: Congressman, you're an attorney. You know that the 4 federal judges have already ruled the Speaker 3: And I know that it's on appeal in front of the Supreme Court right now. Speaker 4: That debate was Speaker 0: very constructive. Speaker 3: That was fun. Speaker 4: I think that got to the heart of the issue. Speaker 0: It was constructive. Tell you, man, it makes me wanna go testify in front of the House of Representatives. It sounds fun. What, Dan? You little punk. How about this? Right? Whatever he questions you about, whatever, you know, just be prepared just to go after the democrats, essentially. Oh, shout out to Schellenberger. Shout out to Taibbi for holding their grounds in there for bringing us this incredible news. I mean, these guys are doing really, really important reporting. Some very heavy lifting. This stuff is nefarious, man. It is the mind control that we're all talking about. Right? We all wake up. Where do these weird narratives start. Like, why are we all listening to, like, underwater submarines blowing up? Like, where do these narratives come that just capture everybody's attention and just deviate us down different path. Is this? It's right here. Yeah. They just exposed it all. And it's still in operation, I'm sure of it. And they're gearing up, man. And so we've got to overcome that organically. All of this digital suppression, debanking, the whole, you know, Jeopardy board of spreadsheet problems that they were had up there for us to see, different attack vectors and so on. We gotta overcome that in massive massive numbers, and we will. And so we'll be here continuing to cover this, my friends. Thank you for joining us as we do. Thank you for hitting that subscribe button wherever it is you're watching it. Thanks for inviting a friend or family member to come over and join us. We go live 5 PM Eastern Time, and we'd love to see you here with them. We'll look forward to seeing everybody here on the next
dmills3710
Posted - February 25, 2020 at 12:01 AM
Saved - November 8, 2023 at 6:06 PM

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“Leaked Memo exposes shady dealings between Clinton Fdn Donors & Bill Clinton’s ‘For-Profit’ activities” “$14Million from companies such as: Coca-Cola, UBS, Barclays, Dow, Rockefeller Fdn, Laureate Fdn & Intnl Universities, Indo Gold, AIF” https://t.co/LOzsnUo956

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“Leaked Memo exposes shady dealings between Clinton Fdn Donors & Bill Clinton’s ‘For-Profit’ activities” “$14Million from companies such as: Coca-Cola, UBS, Barclays, Dow, Rockefeller Fdn, Laureate Fdn & Intnl Universities, Indo Gold, AIF”

dmills3710
Posted - October 19, 2023 at 3:47 PM
Saved - October 19, 2023 at 4:01 PM

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“Package Handlers” Were Being Recruited Before 2020 Election: What Might They Have Been Handling?? Ballots?? https://t.co/t5TvCAYMji

dmills3710
Posted - May 16, 2020 at 3:05 AM
Saved - September 30, 2023 at 2:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dianne Feinstein's past is riddled with controversies. Her intern, Dan White, shot Mayor George Moscone and Harvey Milk, leading to Feinstein becoming Mayor of San Francisco. White later went to prison and committed suicide. Feinstein's first husband, Bertram Feinstein, was accused of child sexual abuse. There are even claims that Feinstein orchestrated the murders because White refused to carry out a plan. Warren Buffet and Richard Blum's involvement in Texas and Pacific Partners resulted in crimes worse than ENRON, including tripling electric bills and looting electric companies for carbon. Feinstein's connections to Huawei raise questions about how their chips ended up in Apple iPhones, as well as in naval warships and fighter planes. The UK is now moving to drop Huawei as a 5G vendor. Feinstein's political corruption is a cause for concern.

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

Dianne Feinstein: 1978, Her intern, Dan White, who allegedly shot Mayor George Moscone & Harvey Milk after which Feinstein became Mayor of San Francisco. Feinstein’s intern went to prison & eventually “committed suicide.” Feinstein’s first husband, Bertram Feinstein...

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“reportedly accused of child sexual abuse, died before investigation could be completed” https://youtu.be/AnXV2Vw_1IE law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projec… Did Dianne Feinstein actually carry out these murders because Dan White backed out & refused to carry out the plan? https://corruptico.com/2014/03/28/dianne-feinstein-guns-down-moscone-milk-using-own-38-special/

Dianne Feinstein Guns-Down Moscone, Milk Using Own .38 Special - Corruptico Destruction of the gay political movement in San Francisco was the single motivating factor behind elite Jewish planned killings of Mayor George Moscone and... corruptico.com

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

“Dear to whom it may concern After ENRON Warren Buffet and Richard Blum took over and commited crimes worse than ENRON .Texas and Pacific Partners trippled Electric bills and looted elec cos for carbon” @JohnJChase1

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

How did Huawei get their chips into Apple Iphones? Feinstein knows... #Huawei @SenFeinstein + Apple iPhones - Got Connections?!?! Chips in Naval Warships & Fighter Planes UK Moves to Drop Huawei as 5G Vendor

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

#DianneFeinstein #PoliticalCorruption

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

#Feinstein @Paulmuaddib61_

dmills3710
Posted - November 26, 2020 at 5:46 PM
Saved - September 15, 2023 at 5:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Countries and groups allegedly involved in the 2020 US election access and manipulation have been identified in Michigan Filing Exhibit 105. These include Serbia, Iran (linked to a Netherlands server), China, and Canada. Entities like HSBC Bank Canada, BMA Capital Management, DVSCORP Chinese Domain, and Indivisible (formerly ACORN) are mentioned. Additionally, it is noted that Serbian media is reportedly under the control of former CIA Director David Petraeus.

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

Michigan Filing: Exhibit 105 Countries/Groups Involved in US Election 2020 Access/Manipulation Belgrade, Serbia Iran (address tied to Netherlands server) China Canada HSBC Bank Canada BMA Capital Management DVSCORP (Chinese Domain) Indivisible (formerly ACORN) @SidneyPowell1

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

Michigan Filing: Exhibit 105 📑 https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.15.pdf

Exhibit Exhibit 105 – #1, Att. #15 in King v. Whitmer (E.D. Mich., 2:20-cv-13134) – CourtListener.com COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8187034 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Washtenaw - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit 101, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit 102, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit 103, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit 104, # 15 Exhibit Exhibit 105, # 16 Exhibit Exhibit 106, # 17 Exhibit Exhibit 107, # 18 Exhibit Exhibit 108, # 19 Exhibit Exhibit 109) (Rohl, Gregory) (Entered: 11/25/2020) courtlistener.com

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

Michigan Filing: Exhibit 105 📑 https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.15.pdf

Exhibit Exhibit 105 – #1, Att. #15 in King v. Whitmer (E.D. Mich., 2:20-cv-13134) – CourtListener.com COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8187034 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Washtenaw - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit 101, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit 102, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit 103, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit 104, # 15 Exhibit Exhibit 105, # 16 Exhibit Exhibit 106, # 17 Exhibit Exhibit 107, # 18 Exhibit Exhibit 108, # 19 Exhibit Exhibit 109) (Rohl, Gregory) (Entered: 11/25/2020) courtlistener.com

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

Michigan Filing: Exhibit 105 📑 https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.15.pdf

Exhibit Exhibit 105 – #1, Att. #15 in King v. Whitmer (E.D. Mich., 2:20-cv-13134) – CourtListener.com COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8187034 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Washtenaw - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit 101, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit 102, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit 103, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit 104, # 15 Exhibit Exhibit 105, # 16 Exhibit Exhibit 106, # 17 Exhibit Exhibit 107, # 18 Exhibit Exhibit 108, # 19 Exhibit Exhibit 109) (Rohl, Gregory) (Entered: 11/25/2020) courtlistener.com

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

Michigan Filing: Exhibit 105 📑 https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.15.pdf

Exhibit Exhibit 105 – #1, Att. #15 in King v. Whitmer (E.D. Mich., 2:20-cv-13134) – CourtListener.com COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8187034 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Washtenaw - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit 101, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit 102, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit 103, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit 104, # 15 Exhibit Exhibit 105, # 16 Exhibit Exhibit 106, # 17 Exhibit Exhibit 107, # 18 Exhibit Exhibit 108, # 19 Exhibit Exhibit 109) (Rohl, Gregory) (Entered: 11/25/2020) courtlistener.com

@dmills3710 - Liberty Times & Politics

ICYMI 2018: Serbian Media In Hands of Former CIA Director David Patraeus https://www.stalkerzone.org/serbian-media-is-now-in-the-hands-of-the-former-cia-director-david-petraeus/

Домен припаркован в Timeweb bone020.timeweb.ru
View Full Interactive Feed