TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @drsimonegold

Saved - February 7, 2026 at 6:37 AM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

In April 2020, the government warned doctors: prescribe an FDA-approved drug and you could lose your license. That isn’t guidance. That’s unlawful coercion. That’s when I knew we were in serious trouble. https://t.co/v0WoQezG4E

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0, an ER physician with twenty-five years of experience and a lawyer, recounts a pivotal moment in April 2020. California doctors received a letter stating that if they prescribed hydroxychloroquine, they could lose their medical licenses. He emphasizes that, as a physician and attorney, you cannot tell a doctor they cannot prescribe an FDA-approved medication, noting that this is not a permissible category of action. The letter horrified him, and he was stunned by the idea of government involvement in medical prescribing. To gauge the reaction, he asked his peers what they thought about the letter, but they largely shrugged. This lack of widespread concern among colleagues contrasted with his own reaction and intensified his alarm. He describes this experience as the moment it activated him to go public. Before that moment, he focused on individual patient care, but the letter prompted a broader sense of urgency. Ultimately, he states that this experience woke him up and made him very scared for America. The core points are the content of the letter and its implications for medical practice, his professional background informing his response, the skeptical reaction of peers, and the personal turning point that led him to go public.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was working in the ER at the time. And, in April 2020, all California doctors received a letter in the mail that if they prescribed hydroxychloroquine, they could lose their medical license. So just take a step back and think about that. I'm a doctor for twenty five years. I'm also a lawyer, and I know how this works. You can't tell a doctor that they can't prescribe an FDA medication. That's just actually not a category of things you can do. So I got this letter, and I was so horrified that our government was getting involved in this. So the first thing I did is I asked my peers, well, what did you think about this letter? And they were kinda shrugging their shoulders. I was stunned. I would say that's actually what activated me to go public. Prior to that, I just did what I could for each patient, but that that really woke me up. I was very scared for America.
Saved - February 4, 2026 at 4:08 AM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Social distancing was fabricated. Fauci admitted it under oath. The CDC admitted it. Fake rules closed schools, destroyed lives, and stripped rights. They must be held accountable. https://t.co/zF6BBUJJXh

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that social distancing was completely made up and used to justify school closures because most schools didn’t have the space for such measures. They claim it was a very specific thing and that Fauci, testifying before the Senate in January 2024, admitted it was totally fabricated. The speaker also states that the CDC director said the same. They emphasize that there was not a single thing said that was true, describing this as concerning. They quote the idea: “If you can make if you can make people believe absurdities, you can make them commit atrocities.” The speaker concludes with, “So that's my perspective.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Social distancing completely made up. It was also made up so that the schools would be closed because schools couldn't stay open with that degree. Most schools didn't have that kind of room. It was a very specific thing. They had Fauci on the stand in the senate in in January '24 and he admitted it was totally fabricated. CDC director said said that as well and there was I can't think of a single thing that was said that was true and that's what is so concerning. Who's the person who said, if you can make if you can make people believe absurdities, you can make them commit atrocities. So that's my perspective.
Saved - October 27, 2025 at 11:24 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Deb Conrad, PA, was fired mid-shift for doing her legal duty—reporting Covid vaccine injuries to VAERS. She was thrown out of the hospital for telling the truth about suppressed data. This is what happens when medicine serves Pharma instead of patients. https://t.co/3RQ2rfErx5

Video Transcript AI Summary
He was fired for reporting COVID vaccine adverse events under the emergency use authorization to the VAIR system, the vaccine adverse event reporting system. He was required to do this by law and he whistle blew on his organization on the High Wire show with Dell Bigtree. He also did a little piece for the New York Times. This was when the man gays were coming down and they asked me why I wasn't getting the COVID vaccine and I talked about all the side effects and the suppression of the reporting that was going on. Two weeks after without warning. I was surrounded in the middle of my shift; I had been actively seeing patients on the floor. They surrounded me and then literally threw me out of the hospital. Patients were abandoned that day because I was supposed to go back and see them for discharge and they don't know what happened to me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was fired for reporting COVID vaccine adverse events under the emergency use authorization to the VAIR system, is the vaccine adverse event reporting system. I was required to do this by law and I whistle blew on my organization on the high wire show with Dell Bigtree. I also did a little piece for the New York Times. This was when the man gays were coming down and they asked me why I wasn't getting the COVID vaccine and I talked about all the side effects and the suppression of the reporting that was going on two weeks after without warning. I was surrounded in the middle of my shift. I had been actively seeing patients on the floor. They surrounded me and then literally threw me out of the hospital. Patients were abandoned that day because I was supposed to go back and see them for discharge and they don't know what happened to me.
Saved - October 12, 2025 at 10:36 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

RFK Jr. just exposed how aluminum adjuvants in vaccines can induce allergies. By binding aluminum to proteins like peanut or latex, scientists can create lifelong allergies—and we’ve been injecting this into children for decades. This demands further investigation. https://t.co/ryDDkKCV19

Video Transcript AI Summary
Here's something that people should know, is that aluminum provokes an allergic response, and that's why it's valuable. So if you put the aluminum in with the viral antigen, your body now mounts an allergic response to that viral antigen, whether it's polio or hepatitis B or the, you know, HPV or whatever. the alumina also creates allergic responses to anything that's in the ambient environment. So if you have a peanut oil excipient in that vaccine, you and you put aluminum in it, now you could have a lifetime allergy to peanuts. And, you know, there’s two studies by Mawson and Cowlings, which show that children who are vaccinated with aluminum vaccines have thirty times the rate of allergic rhinitis as kids who don't.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's something that people should know, is that aluminum provokes an allergic response, and that's why it's valuable. So if you put the aluminum in with the viral antigen, your body now mounts an allergic response to that viral antigen, whether it's polio or hepatitis B or the, you know, HPV or whatever. So but what we now know, the science suggests, is that the alumina also creates allergic responses to anything that's in the ambient environment. So if you have a peanut oil excipient in that vaccine, you and you put aluminum in it, now you could have a lifetime allergy to peanuts. If you if there's a Timothy weed outbreak, the the week that you get that aluminum vaccine, you now may have a lifetime allergy to to Timothy weed. And that's why probably, you know, there's two studies by Mawson and Cowlings, which show that children who are vaccinated with aluminum vaccines have thirty times the rate of allergic rhinitis as kids who don't. And, you know, all of these, these food allergy epidemics date to the time that we started giving these kids this aluminum. And because my kids have these allergies, I'm one of the founders of the food allergy initiative in the Food Allergy Network, which is the biggest food allergy research group. And what, you know, so that group has scientists from all over the world who are giving food allergies to rats, and then figuring out how to treat them. How do they give the allergy to the rat? They take the aluminum adjuvant from the hepatitis B vaccine, add a latex molecule, and that rat now has a permanent latex allergy. You add a peanut molecule and it has a permanent peanut allergy. You add a dairy molecule and it now has a permanent dairy allergy. Oh, you wonder why all of this whole generation of children is allergic to stuff is because we've been inducing allergies by pumping them full of aluminum. That's great. That's crazy. Yeah. Thank thank you very, very much for coming on.
Saved - August 26, 2025 at 11:40 AM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

She refused the shot, got a religious exemption, and spoke honestly about what she was seeing. For that, her hospital dragged her into a room, interrogated her, and walked her out like a criminal. This is what medical tyranny looked like in 2021. https://t.co/qtmLu9rtlL

Video Transcript AI Summary
"The '21, we were going to have to get vaccinated in order to keep our jobs." "So I obtained a securities of religious exemption." "It was approved." "So in that interview with the New York Times, they asked me, you know, if I was gonna get vaccinated." "And I said, no, because I'm seeing all of these problems with these vaccines." "They said, grab your things, come with us, brought me into a room and interrogated me for about fifteen minutes or so asking me about the interview." "And they said, well, are you going to walk out quietly? Or are we going to have to walk you out?" "And I just remember looking at them like, what are you talking about?"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The '21, we were going to have to get vaccinated in order to keep our jobs. So I obtained a securities of religious exemption. It was approved. So in that interview with the New York Times, they asked me, you know, if I was gonna get vaccinated. And I said, no, because I'm seeing all of these problems with these vaccines. But after that interview, I ended up coming back from lunch at work one day and I sat down at my workstation and I was front of all the staff. They said, grab your things, come with us, brought me into a room and interrogated me for about fifteen minutes or so asking me about the interview. And they said, well, are you going to walk out quietly? Or are we going to have to walk you out? And I just remember looking at them like, what are you talking about? Are you people crazy? Like, I mean, what do you mean walk me out? And these are my friends. I mean, the people that interrogated me, these are people I've worked with and know very well. And I think because I was arguing back, they just said, okay. Well, we're gonna walk her up. Like, I'm not a criminal. I'm just reporting to an agency that we're required to report to.
Saved - August 21, 2025 at 4:06 AM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

RFK Jr just exposed that 36,000+ doctors had their Medicare payments manipulated to push childhood vaccines. This isn’t medicine — it’s bribery. Big Pharma & government turned doctors into sales reps. The corruption is staggering. https://t.co/gxnBOtZUX8

Saved - April 14, 2025 at 1:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe a child cannot consent to permanent changes like sterility, and parents shouldn't authorize altering a healthy body. This seems like medical malpractice without legal precedent. It's crucial to find a trustworthy doctor for any medical decisions.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

A child cannot consent to permanent sterility. And no parent has the legal or moral right to authorize the mutilation of their child’s healthy body. There is no common law precedent for this. It’s medical malpractice—plain and simple.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Informed consent requires the ability to understand what one is consenting to. A person with dementia requires a medical power of attorney to consent for them because they can understand the information. A child cannot understand permanent sterility, therefore they cannot consent. Parents also cannot consent for a child to undergo permanent mutilation. Common law precedent does not allow one person to consent for another person to have permanent, mutilating effects on their body. If a physician were to remove a child's hand at the parent's request, the physician would go to jail, even with parental consent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You cannot give informed consent to somebody who's not possessing the ability to understand what you're consenting to. That's why a debilitated older adult, someone's mother with dementia, will have a medical power of attorney who's an adult daughter who then can consent because they can understand what they're hearing. The child cannot understand what it means to have permanent irreversible sterility. So then you say, well okay, the parent could consent on their behalf. Absolutely not. Common law precedent is the law that humans have engaged in for thousands of years. Assault is known in common law. That's against the rules. There is no common law precedent for one human being to consent for another human being to have a permanent mutilating effect on their body. In fact, if a parent had come in to me as a physician and said, you know, I've got my 14 year old child. I just want to chop off his hand because he needs to learn a lesson. And if I were to do that procedure, I would go to jail even though the parent consented to it.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Find a doctor you can trust: http://GoldCare.com

Join GoldCare’s Healthcare Revolution for $10/Month – Trusted by 10,000+ Members Tired of the Medical Industrial Complex? GoldCare offers ethical, independent healthcare solutions. Join now for just $10/month and reclaim control over your health. goldcare.com
Saved - January 29, 2025 at 1:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
For 70 years, hydroxychloroquine was deemed safer than Tylenol by the FDA's adverse event database. Suddenly, it was labeled 'dangerous' by the media. This feels more like propaganda than medicine. Also, check out my full episode with Jordan Peterson on YouTube.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

For 70 years, hydroxychloroquine was considered safer than Tylenol, according to the FDA’s own adverse event database (FAERS). Then suddenly, the media labeled it ‘dangerous.’ This wasn’t medicine—it was propaganda. https://t.co/VhhFR7DnEU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctors were aware that hydroxychloroquine was safe until the media suggested otherwise. They claimed it was both safe and effective, but when the narrative shifted to it being unsafe, despite its 70-year history and a government database showing it to be safer than Tylenol, it raised concerns. The assertion of its lack of safety felt like a significant deception.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But all the doctors knew hydroxychloroquine was safe until media told them otherwise. So let me this nifty trick they did, they're safe and effective. So if the media and the and the journals had just said, oh, it's not effective. Right. Right. Right. Maybe I would have fallen for it. I don't think so. But maybe. But when they started saying it wasn't safe, when we've had it for 70 years, when there's a government database on called FAERS Yeah. The FDA adverse events reporting system Mhmm. Which keeps track of all side effects of drugs. Mhmm. And hydroxychloroquine is much safer than Tylenol in that database. They started saying it's not safe. I knew Right. This is a big lie.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Watch the full episode with @jordanbpeterson on YouTube: https://youtu.be/98vOV1QBQEY?feature=shared

Saved - January 23, 2025 at 1:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Biden’s Bureau of Prisons Director, Colette Peters, is out. Under her leadership, January 6 defendants faced horrific conditions and retaliation for complaints, including solitary confinement. The treatment of these defendants was criminal, and I call for a full investigation and justice.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

BREAKING: Biden’s Bureau of Prisons Director, Colette Peters, is OUT. Under her leadership, the Bureau systematically abused January 6 defendants, forcing them into horrific prison conditions. Complaints were met with retaliation, including solitary confinement. The way the BOP treated these defendants was criminal. A full investigation is needed. We demand justice.

Saved - January 21, 2025 at 2:51 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

I have just received notice that I was granted a full and unconditional pardon for January 6th. I have wept tears of joy. The severe abuses of power from the Biden DOJ have finally been acknowledged and rectified. Thank you @realDonaldTrump for standing with us. 🇺🇸 https://t.co/4AvYMItU49

Saved - December 12, 2024 at 12:39 AM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

BREAKING: The UK has indefinitely BANNED puberty blockers for minors, citing “unacceptable safety risk” to children. How many children had to be hurt in this horrific experiment in order for the “experts” to determine this? We knew the truth from day one. https://t.co/gvKzCH8u6o

Saved - December 9, 2024 at 12:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m Lisa Domsk, an IT specialist with over 30 years at Blue Cross. I was fired for refusing the COVID vaccine due to my Catholic beliefs against embryonic stem cell research. After suing for religious discrimination, I received $12.7 million. Justice is being served!

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

This is Lisa Domsk, who was an IT specialist at Blue Cross for over 30 years. She was fired for refusing to take the COVID vaccine because of her devout Catholic faith, which teaches against embryonic stem cell research—which the vaccines were likely created with. After suing for religious discrimination against her Catholic faith, she just received 12.7 million. Justice is beginning to be served. REPOST to share your congratulations!

Saved - December 5, 2024 at 9:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I often discuss Dr. Fauci, despite his retirement, because his actions have caused significant harm to our country. The conversation must continue until he is held accountable for his legacy of destruction. I believe he deserves to be labeled as a criminal, not a doctor.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Some people wonder why I still talk about Dr. Fauci. After all, he is retired and no longer works in the Federal Government. But Dr. Fauci inflicted so much harm on this country that we must not cease the conversation until he is held criminally liable. Millions of Americans still suffer from Dr. Fauci’s legacy of destruction. He must be held accountable.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Calling him Doctor was even too generous. He’s not a doc. He’s a criminal.

Saved - October 22, 2024 at 11:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a shocking story about a 5-year-old named Isaac who developed severe autism after receiving 18 vaccines in one day due to a judge's order during a custody battle. He ended up hospitalized for 12 days following the vaccinations.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

WOW: 5 year old develops severe autism after court-forced vaccines. A Tennessee judge's ultimatum during a custody battle led to a child receiving 18 vaccines in one day. Post-vaccination, 5-year-old Isaac was hospitalized for 12 days, and later diagnosed with severe autism.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Link: https://www.thegoldreport.com/news/5-year-old-develops-autism-after-being-forced-to-get-18-vaccines-in-1-day

5-Year-Old Develops Autism After Being Forced to Get 18 Vaccines in 1 Day Oct 21, 2024 - The Gold Report Staff - As part of a custody battle, a Tennessee judge ordered a family to vaccinate children who had never been vaccinated thegoldreport.com
Saved - October 9, 2024 at 1:56 AM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

WOW: A study involving 1.7 million children has found that myocarditis and pericarditis only appeared in children who had received Covid mRNA vaccines. Not a single unvaccinated child in the group suffered from these heart-related problems. This is absolutely shocking. https://t.co/aI6Vs5XeC0

Saved - September 27, 2024 at 7:44 AM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

BREAKING: Gilead Sciences has announced a recall of its antiviral drug remdesivir. Remdesivir had a 53% mortality rate in clinical trials done in Africa. This is the same medication they forced on us while preventing us from using hydroxychloroquine & ivermectin! https://t.co/gJkuo451SP

Saved - September 24, 2024 at 2:21 AM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Did you take the Covid-19 vaccine? Reply with why or why not below 👇

Saved - August 26, 2024 at 8:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Zelenko's deathbed message urges resistance against WHO's fear tactics, a denunciation of the global elite, and a call to reconnect with the creator. Dr. Gold honors his contributions and expresses hope for his peace, while Dr. Zelenko emphasizes the urgency of his message today.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Dr. Zelenko’s Deathbed Message: Resist the WHO’s fear propaganda, denounce the global elite, and reconnect with the creator. He was a good man whose contributions to society were monumental. May he rest in peace. https://t.co/YsGNciSqp4

@frank_zelenko - Frank (Ephraim) Zelenko

@drsimonegold Hi Dr Gold, this is Dr Zelenkos most urgent message, more relevant todau than when he recorded it https://t.co/qhALQwU6Gg

@frank_zelenko - Frank (Ephraim) Zelenko

“…. theres a class of virus called SINGLE STRAND RNA…includes all the covid strains, influenza virus, rsv, MARBURG VIRUS, ebola, hanta….SAME TREATEMENT using ZINC IONOPHORES(HCQ, IVN, QUERCITIN, EGCG) and ZINC....” https://t.co/PDtthGBEek

Video Transcript AI Summary
Single-stranded RNA viruses, such as COVID-19, influenza, RSV, Marburg, Ebola, and hantavirus, use RNA-dependent RNA polymerase to replicate. Zinc ionophores and zinc could inhibit all these viruses because they share this common pathway. This has significant national security implications that are not fully realized. Investigation is needed, especially with concerns about hemorrhagic fever and viruses like Marburg and Ebola, which have high death rates. A simple, cheap, oral approach may solve these public health and bioterrorism problems.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So there's a class of viruses called single stranded RNA viruses. And some of those viruses include all the COVID strains, COVID 19, influenza virus, RSV virus, Marburg virus, Ebola virus, hantavirus, and there are a few others. The point being is that they all are single stranded RNA viruses that use the same common pathway in making copies of their genetic material. That's something called RNA dependent RNA polymerase. That's what I've been talking about for the last 2 years in the context of COVID nineteen. But if we extrapolate that to think more broadly, then it's the same mechanism of treatment using zinc ionophores and zinc could inhibit all the strains of COVID 19, influenza virus, RSV virus, Ebola virus, Marburg virus, and hantavirus. This has tremendous amount of, national security implications. And I don't think anyone realizes this. And so I'm pleading with our scientists and, the honest people in our government to investigate this because as the recent chatter, in the news is going, we're seeing hemorrhagic fever from China. This concern about Marburg virus, antivirus, and Ebola virus. These viruses carry, you know, to some estimates, 90% death rates. So I think there may be a solution to all these huge public health and bioterrorist, problems all with one simple, cheap, oral approach. Basically
Saved - August 13, 2024 at 12:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m amazed to learn that nearly 50,000 physicians are encouraging patients, particularly in Left-wing demographics, to register to vote. They wear badges with QR codes that link to a voter registration site provided by Vot-ER, a nonprofit advocating for voting as a therapeutic practice. Some doctors, like Dr. Julie Graziane, believe voting empowers patients and aids in their recovery. However, Vot-ER's connections raise questions, as its founder has ties to the Democratic Party and the organization conducts training on topics like "medical racism."

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

WOW: Nearly 50,000 physicians are now pressuring patients in Left-wing demographics to register to vote. These doctors wear badges displaying QR codes for patients to scan with their phones, which takes them to a website that registers them as voters.  The badges and the website are provided by Vot-ER, a Left-wing nonprofit group that promotes voting as a therapeutic treatment for patients. Physicians at the Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute, for example, claim that voter registration is a "therapeutic tool" that "helps empower patients and makes them feel good." Dr. Julie Graziane, an inpatient psychiatrist in the hospital’s Geriatrics unit, says that "voting is an important part of the recovery process.” Vot-ER founder Dr. Alister Martin once told a patient who had an asthma attack that voting was the “only way” to get the “smog out of the air.” While Vot-ER claims to be nonpartisan, Dr. Martin is a Democrat donor who served as an adviser to Kamala Harris. The organization hosts regular training sessions on “medical racism” conducted by instructors who list their pronouns. One of the instructors is Vot-ER Chief of Staff Leah Ford, who says her pronouns are “they/them” and was once Planned Parenthood’s Volunteer of the Year.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Read the full article here: https://www.thegoldreport.com/news/how-a-left-wing-group-is-turning-doctors-into-activists

How a Left-wing group is turning doctors into activists Aug 12, 2024 - Yudi Sherman - 'Voting is an important part of the recovery process' thegoldreport.com
Saved - August 2, 2024 at 2:36 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

This is what happens when Big Pharma installs their allies into positions of power. https://t.co/f2VaG36I7K

Saved - August 2, 2024 at 11:17 AM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Large healthcare corporations are slowly taking over family practices. Eventually, there will be very few physician owned practices left, and large corporate interests will have a complete monopoly on your health. This is much more dangerous than you realize.

Saved - March 19, 2024 at 5:17 AM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

The Covid “experts” have tried to retract and bury their false statements of “fact” from the pandemic. They were wrong. We knew they were wrong. We called them out. They censored us. Now, even the so-called experts can’t run from the truth. @drscottjensen https://t.co/mM6hw1Lpf2

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the past, medical advice on eggs, aspirin, and other issues has been corrected without retracting articles. However, during the COVID pandemic, poorly researched articles were used to attack individuals like us. Now, as COVID cases decrease, these articles are being withdrawn from public view. If evidence is being buried, shouldn't that raise a red flag for you?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 1st, we could take the fact that we have backtracked in medicine in terms of you can't eat eggs, or you should take an aspirin every day, or this or that is a good idea. Or if you're having heartburn and a and an ulcer, you should drink milk because that'll make your tummy feel better even though now we know that that oftentimes is the worst thing you could do. When we had to self correct in medicine, you didn't see us withdrawing and retracting the articles that had been written about eggs and aspirin and medical issues like that. But this time around, if you look at what's happened, especially over the last 12 to 18 months, articles that were poorly written, poorly researched, perhaps not peer reviewed, frequently not randomized, frequently not even with the control group. Those articles were used to absolutely harpoon people like you and Peter McCullough, Jay Bhattacharya, Scott Atlas, Johnny Unitas, Harvey Riesch, myself, all over the nation. Those articles were used against us. And now now that you're starting to see the intensity of COVID evaporate a little bit, you're starting to see those articles. Sometimes whole journals being withdrawn from the public square, withdrawn from social media. You won't be able to find them on the internet. These articles are disappearing. Hundreds of articles. Well I would say this, if someone tries to bury evidence, doesn't that make a red flag go up for you?
Saved - January 18, 2024 at 10:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I successfully retained my physician's license after a medical licensing hearing with the California Medical Board. Despite their wasteful efforts, we prevailed in the face of a fraudulent witch-hunt. The fight continues.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

In November, I concluded a medical licensing hearing with the California Medical Board. I am pleased to announce that I have successfully retained my physician’s license. The CMB wasted tens of thousands of tax-payer dollars on a fraudulent witch-hunt in their efforts to target me, but we prevailed. The fight continues.

Saved - December 26, 2023 at 9:12 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

“No one should be made to choose between his or her livelihood and a potentially deadly DNA-altering and experimental injection.” Twenty-four former NYC workers who were fired for refusing the COVID jab are demanding their jobs back. Our fight continues. https://t.co/GLDPEv3Plz

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration about not being able to return to work despite the vaccine mandate being lifted. They explain that fired workers can reapply for their previous positions but must sign away their rights and may still be denied their jobs. The speaker highlights their dedication as a teacher, working through the pandemic while pregnant and prioritizing their students. They mention being fired without due process for declining the vaccine. They also raise concerns about the hidden data on vaccine side effects, such as blood clots, strokes, reproductive issues, and excessive mortality. The speaker concludes by stating that no one should have to choose between their livelihood and a potentially dangerous vaccine, and calls for an apology for all employees affected by the mandate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Even though the vaccine mandate has been lifted, I have still not been able to return to work because the city has determined the fired workers will not be reinstated, but may reapply for their previous positions at which time they will sign away their rights to challenge their employment status and potentially be denied their jobs again, this time with no recourse. Should they be rehired, they would start from the bottom at the lowest salary step and without tenure. That is not happening, not after I gave my life to that job for a decade. I was an exemplary teacher calling an employee. I received timely effective observations, led professional development conferences, set the bar for parent outreach in student engagement and barely ever took a day off. At the end of my career, I worked pregnant through the pandemic because I knew my students, especially with my special education population needed in person learning. My students were always as much a priority to me as my own family, often to the detriment of my family since the job required ample personal time and attention outside of school hours. This might sound like an overabundance Self critics, but I will not be silent about the dedication I put into a career that was so quick to throw me aside. I was the kind of teacher whom you would want your son or daughter to have, And I was fired without a formal charge, without the due process that is my lawful right because I declined an objection that we have since learned and wreaked havoc on the lives of so many. I will forever stand on my decision to maintain my dignity, my health, my bodily autonomy, and my freedom from unnecessary medical interventions, especially since the data that Pfizer and other manufacturers wanted to hide for 75 years Has not been kind to them. Blood clots and strokes, reproductive issues, heart attacks in both the old and young, unprecedented miscarriages and aggressive cancers, Excessive all cause mortality in the youngest age bracket to date. People are suffering from these shots. And while that is an entirely different conversation and one that will come to light sooner And one that will come to light soon later, the takeaway from today's is this. No one should be getting to choose between his or her livelihood a potentially deadly DNA alter than experimental injection, all city employees who were fired or forced to resign due to the vaccine mandate deserve an apology. Never stop demanding to be made whole
Saved - December 25, 2023 at 12:41 AM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Deadly Disinformation Dozen #8: Pfizer CEO, Albert Bourla “You vaccinate not only for yourself, you vaccinate also to protect society.” It turns out neither is true. Bourla and Pfizer profited off disinformation, and they must be held accountable. https://t.co/vnev4X2AYY

Video Transcript AI Summary
The White House blames a few bad actors for spreading online misinformation that is causing harm. It is important to get vaccinated not only for personal protection but also to safeguard society. A member of the European Parliament from the Netherlands recently had a viral exchange with a Pfizer executive regarding whether the vaccine was tested for stopping virus transmission before being released. The executive clarified that the vaccines were extensively tested in clinical trials, but their specific effectiveness in stopping transmission was not known prior to market entry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The White House pointed to an aggressive online misinformation effort by a handful of bad actors. Misinformation on social media is killing people. Yeah. You vaccinate not only for yourself. You vaccinate also to protect society. Speaker 1: Covering from COVID for the 2nd time in just under 2 months. And last week, an exchange between a member of the European Parliament from the Netherlands and a Pfizer executive about whether the vaccine was tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before entering the market has now gone viral. Speaker 0: Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine Tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market. Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping immunization before, it's entered the market? No. No. The vaccines were tested Ostensibly in clinical trials, and they were ex tested extensively in
Saved - December 22, 2023 at 2:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Children aged 6 months to 4 years should receive 2 doses of Covid-19 vaccine, according to Health Canada's chief medical advisor. Some argue against giving children experimental shots. We must take action for our children's health and safety.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

“Children between six months and four years of age should receive two doses if they have not previously been vaccinated with a Covid-19 vaccine.” - Health Canada’s chief medical advisor, Dr. Supriya Sharma Children should not receive experimental shots. Who else agrees? https://t.co/f7ohv1JR90

Video Transcript AI Summary
Health Canada has authorized the Moderna Spikevax COVID-19 vaccine for individuals aged 6 months and older. The authorization followed a thorough scientific review of its safety, efficacy, and quality. The benefits of the vaccine were found to outweigh the potential risks. People aged 5 and above should receive one dose, regardless of their COVID-19 vaccination history. Children aged 6 months to 4 years should receive two doses if they haven't been previously vaccinated, and if they have, they should follow the recommended dosage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About Health Canada's authorization of the new Moderna Spikevax COVID-nineteen vaccine targeting the omicron XBB 1.5 sub variant. We've authorized this vaccine for people of 6 months of age and older. The vaccine was authorized after an independent and thorough scientific review for safety, efficacy, and quality. After assessing all the data, we've concluded that there is strong evidence showing that the benefits of this vaccine outweigh the potential risks. Individuals who are 5 years of age and older should receive 1 dose of the vaccine, regardless of the COVID nineteen vaccination history. And children between 6 months and 4 years of age should receive 2 doses, if they have not previously been vaccinated with the COVID-nineteen vaccine. And if they have been previously vaccinated with 1 or more doses, then you should receive

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

We can no longer sit on the sidelines and expect government to do the right and responsible thing. We must fight for our children’s health and safety.

Saved - December 2, 2023 at 10:47 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Another study that shows that wearing a mask can have significant negative effects. We have said before. We will say it again. Just say NO. https://t.co/HSec7VGZbA

Video Transcript AI Summary
A German team conducted a review on masking during the COVID-19 pandemic. They found that wearing a mask can increase carbon dioxide concentration in the air by up to 8,800%. High levels of carbon dioxide can lead to symptoms like nerve damage, increased anxiety, impaired learning and memory, and stillbirths at certain concentrations. Italy observed a threefold increase in stillbirths during lockdown periods with mask mandates, while Sweden, without mask mandates, did not experience any increase in stillbirths.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A German team published an extensive review of masking during the COVID nineteen pandemic. Fresh air has a 0.04% carbon dioxide concentration. Wearing a mask increases that up to an 8,800% increase. The symptoms of chronic carbon dioxide toxicity, basically, at a 0.3 carbon dioxide concentration, you have irreversible nerve damage, nerve destruction, increased anxiety, impaired learning and memory. And at 0.8% carbon side concentration, you get stillbirths. In Italy, they noticed a threefold increase in stillbirths during lockdown periods, which included mask mandates. In comparison, Sweden had no mask mandates and no increase in stillbirths.
Saved - November 20, 2023 at 1:35 AM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

BIG WIN: The US Army is inviting back the service members they kicked out for refusing to take the COVID-19 vaccine. Repost if you want wokeness OUT of the military.

Saved - November 16, 2023 at 5:11 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Nevada is now the 7th state to quietly reverse their decision to block HCQ prescriptions for COVID-19. Physicians in Nevada can now once again prescribe HCQ as they deem necessary. Governors lied & restricted medicine that could have saved lives. They should be held accountable. https://t.co/MLtB1dPt5x

Saved - November 13, 2023 at 9:13 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Deadly Disinformation Dozen #5: Dr. Peter Hotez Dr. Hotez spread disinformation about the efficacy and safety of the COVID vaccine. Dr. Hotez, like many others, must be held accountable. Who else agrees? https://t.co/tZkjdY2Flm

Video Transcript AI Summary
The White House blames a few bad actors for spreading online misinformation. They say that misinformation on social media is harmful and can have long-term consequences. Developing a safe and effective vaccine takes time, usually around 10 to 25 years, and requires thorough clinical testing. The timeline for COVID-19 vaccines is similar to that of other vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The White House pointed to an aggressive online misinformation effort by a handful of bad actors. Misinformation on social media is killing people. It's usually a 10 to 25 year time frame. People forget how long it really takes to develop, an effective and safe vaccine and do all the adequate clinical testing. When you look at the timelines of act these COVID nineteen vaccines, it really follows the same progression is almost any other vaccine.
Saved - October 29, 2023 at 6:03 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

The Deadly Dozen #2: former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky Dr. Walensky knowingly lied about the efficacy and safety of the COVID jab, and Americans paid the price for her lies. She must be held accountable. https://t.co/DyWldu1hAb

Video Transcript AI Summary
The White House blames a few bad actors for spreading online misinformation. The CDC states that vaccinated people don't carry the virus or get sick. They also say there are no safety concerns for pregnant or lactating individuals and their babies. However, a new paper using government data found a 1,200-fold increase in menstrual abnormalities after COVID-19 vaccination. Despite this, the CDC claims there are very few safety concerns. There was also a 57-fold increase in another outcome.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The White House pointed to an aggressive online misinformation effort by a handful of bad actors. Misinformation on social media is killing people. Speaker 1: When the head of the CDC, miss Walensky, said that the vaccinated can't get the virus, did that undermine Trusting government data. Speaker 0: Data from the CDCs today suggest, you know, that that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick. We have no reason to believe that getting vaccinated should change your menstrual cycle or make your periods any heavier. Importantly, no safety concerns were observed for people vaccinated in the 3rd trimester, or safety concerns for their babies. We now have data that demonstrates that Scenes in whatever, time in pregnancy, or lactating that they're given, are actually safe and effective and have no adverse events, to mom or to babe. So we absolutely have the data that demonstrates the overwhelming benefit of vaccine. Speaker 1: New paper uses government data to compare outcomes after the COVID nineteen vaccines, and it found a twelve Hundredfold increase in menstrual abnormalities. Speaker 0: Really, very little safety concerns at all. Speaker 1: And a 57 fold increase
Saved - October 25, 2023 at 5:34 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

We heard a lot about disinformation during the pandemic. The greatest purveyor of disinformation by far was Dr. Fauci, and he must be held accountable. https://t.co/VkX9p6Y1iD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The White House blames a few bad actors for spreading online misinformation. The speaker disagrees with the idea that wearing masks is the best way to prevent infectious diseases. They mention that getting vaccinated provides the best protection against infection. The speaker also addresses the misconception that vaccines can make people worse. They mention the possibility of future challenges in infectious diseases and the need for rapid response to new threats. The speaker denies funding gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology and denies lying before Congress.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: White House pointed to an aggressive online misinformation effort by a handful of bad actors. Misinformation on social media is counting people. Do you agree? Speaker 1: Best way for me to prevent getting an infectious disease is what? Wearing a mask? No. No. No. Right now, people should not be there's no reason to be walking around with a mask. Should you be wearing 2 masks or 1 mask. There's nothing wrong with people wearing 2 masks. Can we make a general that doesn't have scientific basis yet? No. Please wear a mask. The optimal degree of protection, what you get Infection is to get vaccinated. Well, if she got the flu for 14 days, she's as protected as anybody can be because the best vaccination is to get infected Did yourself. If you're vaccinated, you really don't need to worry about Getting it in a way that's serious or transmitting it. The risk is extremely low of getting infected, of getting sick, or of transmitting it to anybody else. When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected. Speaker 0: Doctor Fauci says he has COVID again for the 2nd time in 2 weeks. Speaker 1: Does the vaccine make you worse? What well, the latter part of what you just said is untrue. You don't get worse results from vaccinating. So worst Possible thing you could do is vaccinate somebody to prevent infection and actually make them worse. No question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, But also there will be a surprise outbreak. But also there will be a surprise outbreak. Anyway, so let me just go on about NIH lifts funding pause on gain of function research. I don't think this is gonna be foolproof. Things are gonna slip through. Thing that I Aspirationally, hope to be able to encounter is the ability to rapidly respond to something brand new, Whether it's a brand new pandemic or, as you mentioned, a brand new a brand new attack upon us deliberately by Bioterror, A brand new attack upon us deliberately by BioTerror. We did not fund gain of function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute A virology. Senator Paul, I have never lied before the congress.
Saved - October 15, 2023 at 3:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Employees fired by NYC Department of Education for refusing COVID-19 vaccine must be reinstated with backpay. Judge rules denials of religious exemptions to teachers unconstitutional. A significant victory for medical freedom!

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

A New York state judge ruled that employees fired by the New York City Department of Education for refusing to get the COVID-19 “vaccine” must be reinstated with backpay. State Supreme Court Judge Ralph J. Porzio found that the city’s denials of religious exemptions to certain city teachers was unconstitutional. This is a big win for medical freedom!

Video Transcript AI Summary
A New York state judge ruled that 10 employees fired by the New York City Department of Education for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine must be reinstated with back pay. The judge found that the city's denial of religious exemptions to certain teachers was unconstitutional and arbitrary. The judge stated that there was no rational basis for not allowing unvaccinated teachers among primarily unvaccinated students. The judge also referenced Mayor Eric Adams' lifting of the vaccine mandate for some private employees, suggesting that the mandate for public workers was arbitrary. Many workers lost their jobs for not adhering to the mandate. The ruling provides hope for those seeking justice through the courts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, freedom lovers. This is doctor Peterson Peo with America's Front Line Doctors bringing you today's daily dose. So a New York state judge ruled 2 weeks ago that 10 employees fired by the New York City Department of Education for refusing to get the COVID nineteen vaccine have to be reinstated with back pay. Wonderful. State Supreme Court Judge Ralph Porzio found that the city's denials of religious exemptions, which by the way is illegal, to certain city teachers was unconstitutional, capricious, and arbitrary. This is what he had to say. This court sees no rational basis were not allowing unvaccinated classroom teachers in amongst an admitted population of primarily unvaccinated students. As such the decision to summarily deny the classroom teachers amongst the panel petitioners based on an undue hardship without any further evidence of individualized analysis is arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable. As such, each classroom teacher amongst the panel petitioners is entitled to a religious exemption from the vaccine mandate. As part of his ruling, the judge made made reference to mayor Eric Adams' lifting of a vaccine mandate for some private employees in 22, notably celebrities and athletes. Months, he said the decision was evidence that the mandate for public workers was done on an arbitrary basis. MPs reports indicated that thousands of workers, teachers, and other staffers lost their jobs through not adhering to the banned it. So finally, justice is starting to be served. Because we know, forcing people to get an experimental drug is illegal. So for those of you out there who are still struggling, the more you're up, go to the courts, and that's going to be your avenue, though it is slow, it'll still be your avenue for justice. Ladies and gentlemen, only the truth will set you free. Stay tuned for the next daily dose.
Saved - September 17, 2023 at 10:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
CDC Director Mandy Cohen recommends COVID mRNA boosters for all ages, citing extensive data. However, Pfizer's booster lacks efficacy data and was tested on only 10 mice. Moderna's trial involved 50 people, resulting in one adverse event. Claims of reduced hospitalizations, long COVID, and transmission lack scientific proof. Despite limited safety testing, boosters are approved for all ages. Concerns arise over the potential dangers. Source: nypost.com.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

WOW: CDC Director Mandy Cohen is recommending a COVID mRNA booster for everyone 6 months and older, claiming the decision was based on extensive data and clinical trials. However, Pfizer's latest booster recently received approval based on a study involving 10 mice. It has no efficacy data available and was not tested on humans in the data set. Moderna's new booster had a two-week trial with 50 people, resulting in one adverse event requiring medical attention. No additional information was included on the adverse event. White House COVID coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha and CDC head Mandy Cohen have claimed the new vaccine reduces hospitalizations, long COVID and the likelihood you will spread COVID. However, none of these claims have any scientific data or proof. These parameters weren’t even tested. With such little safety testing and medical data, how could the US government not only approve these new vaccine boosters, but recommend them for everyone 6 months and older? This is shockingly dangerous.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The CDC recommends everyone 6 months and older to get the updated COVID-19 vaccine before the fall and winter season. Extensive data and clinical trials support this recommendation. As the head of the CDC and a doctor, I would not recommend anything I wouldn't do for my own family. That's why my husband, parents, and my 9 and 11-year-old daughters will be getting the vaccine. I encourage you to do the same for everyone in your family who is 6 months and older. Don't forget to also get your flu shot. Visit vaccines.gov to find a nearby location and consult your doctor if you have any questions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We would all love to leave COVID nineteen behind. The virus is still here and making some people very sick, especially older adults. The new updated COVID nineteen vaccine is the most effective way to give your body the ability to keep the COVID virus from causing you harm. That's why CDC recommends everyone 6 months and older get one dose of the updated COVID nineteen vaccine ahead of the fall and winter season. This recommendation was based on extensive data and clinical trials. As a doctor, a mom, a wife, a daughter, and head of the CDC, I would not recommend anything to others that I wouldn't recommend for my own family, that's why my 9 and 11 year old daughters, my husband, my parents, and I will all be rolling up our leave to get our updated COVID nineteen vaccine. I encourage you to get your own updated COVID vaccine and make sure everyone in your family who's 6 months and older does so as well. Don't forget, it's also a good time to get your flu shot if you haven't already. Check vaccines.gov To find a location near you and get your vaccine and if you have any questions about the vaccine, please talk to your doctor.

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

Source: @MartyMakary, @TracyBethHoeg https://nypost.com/2023/09/14/the-real-data-behind-the-new-covid-vaccines-the-white-house-is-pushing/

The real data behind the new COVID vaccines the White House is pushing What if I told you one in 50 people who took a new medication had a “medically attended adverse event” and the manufacturer refused to disclose what exactly the complication was — would you take it? nypost.com
Saved - August 6, 2023 at 2:20 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

PLEASE WATCH: Can mRNA Technology be used to control you? According to Dr. Christina Parks, yes. Genetic information can potentially be regulated with the mRNA vaccine. This is terrifying.

Video Transcript AI Summary
mRNA technology, used in COVID vaccines, raises ethical concerns about potential control. Multiple genes and regulatory elements can be inserted, allowing for different vaccinations and antigens to be regulated. This could lead to unknown protein expression when consuming certain foods. S. Matthew Liao, a philosopher, suggests using human engineering to address global issues like meat consumption. By making people intolerant to certain proteins, it could reduce meat consumption and benefit the planet. Doctor Christina Parkes expresses ethical concerns about the regulation of genetic information through hormones, airborne substances, and the food supply. These discussions highlight the potential dangers and ethical implications of mRNA technology and human engineering.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can mRNA technology, the same technology used in the COVID vaccination, be used to control you? Doctor. Christina Parkes, a PhD in cellular and molecular biology, explains the dangerous ethical implications. Speaker 1: This DNA technology, it's kind Kind of a cassette system where they can put in multiple genes and multiple regulatory elements and multiple regulatory elements. So they could say we're gonna you could use multiple vaccinations, multiple antigens, and they can regulate them all differently. What does that look like ethically? Maybe they're putting in this that you know they're putting in, but maybe they're putting in something else that's regulated and then when you eat cheese, it's turned on And now you're expressing a protein you didn't even know was in you. Speaker 0: Is you merely being an alarmist? Would gene therapy really be weaponized to control us? Here's what S. Matthew Liao, a contemporary philosopher and author has to say about human engineering. Speaker 2: People eat too much meat, Right, and if they were to cut down on their consumption on meat, then they would, it would actually really help the planet. But people are not willing to give up meat, so Possibly we can use human engineering to make it the case that we're intolerant to certain kinds of meat, to certain kinds of Bovine protein, that's something that we can do through human engineering. We can kind of, possibly address really big world problems Through human engineering. Speaker 0: In 2019, he was appointed as an elected fellow at the Hastings Centre, a prestigious bioethics research institute. Liao's work has been discussed in places such as The Guardian, the BBC, the New York Times, the Atlantic and Scientific America. It appears Doctor. Christina Parkes was in fact dead on. Speaker 1: Ethically, I have a huge problem with them putting in genetic information that they can then regulate through hormonal or other means, things they spray in the air, things they put in the food supply, very problematic for me.
Saved - June 4, 2023 at 2:52 AM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

WOW: The FDA revoked Johnson and Johnson’s emergency us authorization for the COVID jab. They’re trying to undue the harm that they’ve caused and hope we don’t notice. No. We notice.

View Full Interactive Feed