TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ericmmatheny
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
Strip her of all committee assignments. Mike Johnson has that power. https://t.co/2iUe3kKGBq
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
Every man on that train should’ve been stomping his guts out. Choking him unconscious. Rendering aid to her, holding pressure against the wound. Calling 911. What the fuck? https://t.co/p7pGFJyAHm
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
Adam Schiff should be indicted and spend his life in prison for his role in crafting the fake Russian Collusion Narrative and the years of wasted money and the effect it had on eroding confidence in our institutions. https://t.co/G6Bm3L3ITV
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues the case is more than circumstantial: 'there is more than circumstantial evidence now' and 'there is evidence not only to have been initiated but for it to continue'. He rejects the view there is no evidence of collusion, saying 'They can call it a fishing expedition. They can call it a witch hunt. It's all in a line message with the White House.' He states 'Christopher Steele may have found out even before our own intelligence agencies that the Russians were in fact aiming to help Donald Trump in the election' and that this 'has now been borne out by ample evidence.' He cites 'the Logan Act' as evidence and says 'the evidence is in plain sight.' The Senate intel chairman also said, at this point, no evidence of collusion, but he counters: 'I think there is direct evidence.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I
Speaker 1: think But you admit it's a circum all you have right now is a circumstantial
Speaker 0: case? Actually, no, Chuck. I I can tell you that the case is more than that. And I can't go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now. So again, I think
Speaker 1: direct evidence of collusion?
Speaker 0: I don't want to go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial and and is very much worthy of investigation. So
Speaker 2: Is there has been a report from CNN that Wednesday night that there that the FBI was looking into collusion with with the Russians and the Trump campaign in terms of spreading information about Hillary Clinton's campaign. Is do you have any information to back that up?
Speaker 0: I'm not sure that I can comment on that. I can't say that I think that the investigation that the director talked about at our Monday hearing is justified. I think there is a sufficient basis for that investigation not only to have been initiated but for it to continue at this point. And I don't have a concern with other members characterizing the evidence as they have and many of them have said they think there's no evidence of collusion. My disagreement with those members is I don't think that's accurate.
Okay. And I feel an obligation to say so. So they can call it a fishing expedition. They can call it a witch hunt. It's all in a line message with the White House.
But nonetheless, real evidence is coming forward that just can't be ignored. So we do know a lot more. I I think the claims that there was no evidence collusion have long since fallen away. The question now is what is the the quantum of proof here? Christopher Steele may have found out even before our own intelligence agencies that the Russians were in fact aiming to help Donald Trump in the election.
That has now been borne out by ample evidence. I think you see the most palpable evidence of a collusion in terms of violating the Logan Act. Look, I don't think you can seriously argue that the Russians weren't trying to help Trump and hurt Clinton, as well as so discord in The United States. The evidence is quite overwhelming on this. It was the early conclusion of the intelligence community, but that's only been furthered by all of the evidence we've seen in our investigation.
And
Speaker 3: Put out statement and a report basically saying that they found no evidence of collusion between the Trump team, and the Russian government. Have Democrats found any evidence of collusion?
Speaker 0: Yes. We have.
Speaker 4: Can you agree that there has been no evidence of collusion coordination or conspiracy that has been presented thus far between the Trump campaign and Russia?
Speaker 0: No. I don't agree with that at all. I think there's plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight, that it is very possible that the best evidence, is yet to come. But look, you can see evidence in plain sight, on the issue of collusion. George, there's ample evidence of collusion, of the campaign and its
Speaker 4: The senate intel chairman also said, at this point, no evidence of collusion at this point. Have you seen do you have direct evidence of collusion with Russia?
Speaker 0: Well, I think there is direct evidence. While there is abundant evidence of collusion, but as I've said along, there's plenty of evidence of collusion, and you've said on this show and others that there is direct evidence of collusion. Were you wrong about that now that you've seen the summary of the Tesla Council's report? No. Because they were saying no collusion.
Speaker 4: Your evidence? You've been saying that on TV for years.
Speaker 0: Well, I will tell you, and we and I've also been saying, as you know, that the evidence is in plain sight.
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
Drunk lawyers are the worst. https://t.co/tVihsEYRQl
Video Transcript AI Summary
"the body came off. Protocol is that you turn it off as a citizen request." "it's a turn it off." "They want you guys to leave? Yes. Move out. Let's just leave." "Can we all talk? Can we all talk?" "Talk over here. They want you to leave." "if I ask you to turn off the body cam, you have to turn it off." "She's a lawyer, so she knows." "I'm an AG." "We gotta go." "Don't put your hands on us." "We're leaving." "Relax." "Babe. I'm right here." "Please don't put your hands on us." "We’re leaving."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I
Speaker 1: want you
Speaker 0: to turn the body came off. Protocol is that you turn
Speaker 1: it off as a citizen request. It's a turn it off. She knows.
Speaker 0: So they want you guys to leave? Yes. Move out. Let's just leave. Let's just make it easy.
Okay? We're gonna
Speaker 1: make it easy. I'm not you don't thought you don't thought
Speaker 0: I am. Okay. I'm harassing.
Speaker 1: The point. Can
Speaker 0: you can you look at me? We'll talk over here. Okay? Your protocol is Can we can we all talk? Can we all talk?
Talk over here. They want you to leave.
Speaker 1: Portal was Can
Speaker 0: we can we talk? Who is she to you? What's that?
Speaker 1: No. She's a class.
Speaker 0: Nothing. She is our college friend. Yes.
Speaker 1: No. No. I'm not.
Speaker 0: You guys just wanna know? Do you want him to trespass? Anything we can do. Yeah. Trespass?
Yeah. I just need Trespass. Get him out. Please. No.
Speaker 1: I'm not.
Speaker 0: No. I'm not.
Speaker 1: It's Do
Speaker 0: you wanna chat? I know that your protocol is So you're trespassing, we gotta leave now. Unless you wanna be in air. We're not trespassing. You haven't notified us that we're trespassing.
Number one, no. Did I just say to you? You're trespassing. Let's go. Number one, number you guys.
You're you're
Speaker 1: not gonna arrest us. Number two
Speaker 0: is We gotta go. We gotta go.
Speaker 1: Protocol is Let's meet them. Don't say what I'm do.
Speaker 0: If we ask you to deal
Speaker 1: with the body cam, don't wanna deal with this. Let's go.
Speaker 0: No. No. I understand you don't wanna deal with it, but the protocol
Speaker 1: is and your protocol
Speaker 0: is if I ask you to turn off the body cam, you have
Speaker 1: to turn it off. And that's your protocol. She's a lawyer, so she knows.
Speaker 0: Well, that's lawyer stuff, so that's not true. So we gotta go.
Speaker 1: No. It is. That's that's the law.
Speaker 0: I'm an AG. I'm
Speaker 1: an AG.
Speaker 0: Good for you. I don't give a Let's go. We're going. It's Excuse We're leaving. I'm please don't We're leaving.
Speaker 1: Please don't put your hands on us.
Speaker 0: Can you get your children out of here? Like, I don't know why
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. What?
Speaker 0: Let's go. It's not
Speaker 1: a stop.
Speaker 0: I'm okay.
Speaker 1: Let's go. No. Let's go. Leaving. Oh, because I'm wrong?
You'll prob you have to
Speaker 0: You relax. Sir. Sir. She's not doing anything wrong.
Speaker 1: AG. She's leaving. I'm an AG. She's an AG?
Speaker 0: Before AG? Honey, you're not she's not in the arrest. Let's go. I'm not being arrested. You're putting me
Speaker 1: in cuffs? I'm not being arrested.
Speaker 0: Weapons on you? No.
Speaker 1: That's an
Speaker 0: EG. Her badge is
Speaker 1: your card.
Speaker 0: I'm gonna get a badge. Let me tell you something. You're Buddy, get the hell out
Speaker 1: of here. Wait. Buddy, just seriously. No. Resting in EG.
Let me tell you something. Are you
Speaker 0: on a rest right leg? No. You're putting me in handcuffs and you're Meringue izing. You're not Meringue izing me. Relax.
Relax. No. No. No. I'm right here.
I'm here. I'm right here. Here.
Speaker 1: Come on. Babe? No. No.
Speaker 0: I'm I'm
Speaker 1: Babe. Babe. Please. I'm scared. I'm right here.
Please up to
Speaker 0: this. Please up
Speaker 1: to this. I'm not gonna find those.
Speaker 0: I'm right
Speaker 1: here. No. Okay. No. Please go to the side, friend.
I'm right here. No. No. Right No. Here.
No. Babe. Babe. I'm right
Speaker 0: here. Babe. I'm right here.
Speaker 1: No. Babe. Relax. Relax. Relax.
No. Babe.
Speaker 0: What's wrong with
Speaker 1: you? Relax.
Speaker 0: We don't wanna put you on handcuffs. Let's go. Let's go.
Speaker 1: No. Please. Listen.
Speaker 0: You're making you're overreacting. You're adding chores. I'm overreacting. That's what
Speaker 1: Please take my hands up. Please take the power handcuffs. No. You're overreacting.
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
This was our border one year ago. Today, there are zero crossings. https://t.co/g7oKTkmlW0
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
And this is why the story has completely fallen out of the news. https://t.co/P77RjNLziK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Vance Belter confessed in a handwritten letter to FBI Director Kash Patel that he shot the Hoffmans and Hortmans. Belter claimed he had been trained off the books by the U.S. military and conducted missions in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.
Belter alleged that Minnesota Governor Tim Walz wanted him to kill U.S. Senators Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith. Belter claimed he refused Walz's plan and threatened to go public. He stated people threatened his family to force his participation in the senators' murders. Belter wrote that he met with people to discuss the request, but they tried to kill him. He escaped, returned later, and shot those people. The letter is contained in an unsealed search warrant.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is addressed to the FBI director, Kash Patel. It's a handwritten letter. In it, Vance Belter confesses to being the man who shot the Hoffmans and the Hortmans that night and who had been on the run all weekend. In the letter, Vance Belter claims that he had been trained by the US military off the books, hoping that he had conducted missions on behalf of the US military in Asia, The Middle East, and Africa. In his letter, Vance Belter claims that governor Tim Walls of Minnesota wanted him and approached him about killing United States senator Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith.
Belter claims in the letter that he wanted nothing to do with governor Walz's plan and that he would go public if he insisted. Belter claims that people threatened to hurt his family if he didn't participate in his plan to murder senators Klobuchar and Smith. Belter says in his letter that he met with people to talk about the request. And that when he arrived at the meeting, some people were waiting to kill him. Belter writes wrote that he was able to get away and that he went back a short time later and shot those people.
The letter, as I said, is contained in an unsealed search warrant and and will be made public as I mentioned a month ago.
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
This woman deserved justice. She deserved for the world to know the names of the sick people on the Epstein Client list! Now she is dead and her attackers are being protected. https://t.co/u18leivZJc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ghislain woke the speaker up and said she would meet a prince. That night, Prince Andrew came to Ghislain's house in London, and they went to Club Tramp. Prince Andrew gave the speaker alcohol, probably vodka, in the VIP section. Prince Andrew asked her to dance. After leaving Club Tramp, Ghislain told the speaker that Prince Andrew was coming back to the house and that she wanted her to do for him what she does for Epstein. The speaker couldn't believe that royalty was involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was so young, Ghislain woke me up in the morning and said, you're gonna meet a prince today. I didn't know at that point that I was going to be trafficked to that prince. And then that night, Prince Andrew came to her house in London and we went out to Club Tramp. Prince Andrew got me alcohol. It was in the VIP section.
It was, I'm pretty sure it was vodka. Prince Andrew was like, Let's dance together. And I was like, Okay. And we leave Club Tramp and I hop in the car with Ghislain and Jeffrey. And Ghislain said, He's coming back to the house, and I want you to do for him what you do for Epstein.
I just couldn't believe it. I couldn't believe that even royalty were involved.
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
The world is adjusting to an incoming Trump Presidency. Possibility of peace between Russia and Ukraine; Hezbollah and Israel. Mexico vows to stop sending migrants. Dow is up 2000 points since Election Day. New sheriff in town!
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
Before dismissal, Jack Smith intended to prove that Trump knew he lost the 2020 election because…the Department of Justice told him he had? In other words…not believing the United States Government is a crime. This indictment is something you would see in Iran or North Korea. https://t.co/J93yyObQ77
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
This is the direct result of anti-police rhetoric by elected offficals; defund the police bullshit; and the refusal by progressive politicians to ever suggest that criminals may be responsible for their own actions. https://t.co/EgNliNa5y4
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
Kamala Harris made this statement in August 2020 - at the height of the BLM riots that were destroying cities and costing lives. She encouraged the rioting and endorsed a bail fund. She should be disqualified from holding the office of VP. https://t.co/evMuJIxXFz
Video Transcript AI Summary
They won't stop. It's a movement that will continue before and after the November Election. Everyone should be aware that they won't let up, and we shouldn't either.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's right. But they're not gonna stop. They're not gonna stop. And that's they're not this is a movement I'm telling you. They're not gonna stop.
And and everyone beware because they're not going to stop. It is going to they're not going to stop before Election Day in November, and they're not going to stop after Election Day, And that should be everyone should take note of that on both levels, that this isn't they're not going to let up, and they should not, and we should
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
Based on current trends, it would appear that this is not the worst thing that’s ever happened in the Senate chamber. https://t.co/vxchV55YDk
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
Spoke to Alex on Wednesday morning. The US Bureau of Prisons has classified him as a “domestic terrorist” so he’s relegated to a maximum security penitentiary; not a camp for nonviolent offenders. Alex did not steal, did not assault, and did nothing other than enter the Capitol.
@NotAlexSheppard - Alexander Sheppard 🇺🇸
Today I turn myself in to federal prison for the 19 month sentence I received for peacefully protesting inside the People’s House on January 6th, 2021. I was 21 years old at the time, and I have been fighting these charges for the last 3 years. It is my great honor to be held hostage as a political prisoner in these United States of America. Goodbye, for now…
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
The extreme violence of the January 6th insurrection is difficult to watch, and I apologize for posting it.
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
These guys are actors. Straight out of central casting.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker urges people to stand up for themselves and not resort to violence. They believe that the most violence comes from the other side, which they see as white subjugators working for capitalism and billionaires. They mention the upcoming presidential race and express their belief that voting is useless. They advocate for starting a movement by igniting a fire and encouraging others to join. They emphasize the importance of being fearless and standing up for oneself. The speaker then asks Christopher what he is currently doing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stick up for your fucking self. So what does that mean? Does that mean file? No. It doesn't mean file.
I'm gonna need it now. Violence. The most violence is on your side. Subjugation of our race. That's what we stand against.
The reason that you presupposed that there will be violence is Because you are ready to use filing to stop us. But when you say you, You and all of the people on that side of the fence. White subjugators. You work for that team. Jewry.
Capitalism. Billionaires. That's your side. I know it's your side because you still have a job. Christopher, there's a presidential race going on right now.
Are you gonna vote in 2024? What do you think is gonna happen? My vote is useless. I think Biden's better than Trump because he's sending rockets to Ukraine. Is it in support of Ukraine, AIDS.
Hell, Billy Small. How big does this need to become? And how big do you see it becoming? Paint a picture of this movement. We just have to start a fire.
We have to just start a fire. How do you do that? We're the kindling. And once we set the fire, we get the fire hot, then we get the rest of our brothers Blazin. And how do you do that?
Be the vanguard. Stick up for ourselves. Stand up. Don't be afraid. Show no fear.
What are you doing now, Chris?
@ericmmatheny - Eric Matheny 🎙️
Under the rules of the Biden DOJ, Adam Schiff should be indicted and spend his life in prison for his role in crafting the fake Russian Collusion Narrative and the years of wasted money and the effect it had on eroding confidence in our institutions.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 claims that there is more than circumstantial evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, but cannot provide specifics. Speaker 1 asks if there is evidence to support the FBI's investigation into collusion, to which Speaker 0 responds that there is a sufficient basis for the investigation to continue. Speaker 0 disagrees with members who claim there is no evidence of collusion, stating that real evidence is emerging. They mention Christopher Steele's findings and the intelligence community's conclusion that Russia aimed to help Trump. Speaker 0 asserts that there is overwhelming evidence of collusion and conspiracy. Speaker 3 questions if any evidence of collusion has been found, and Speaker 0 insists that there is plenty of evidence in plain sight.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I think that's it's a circum all you have right now is a circumstantial case. Actually, no, Chuck. I I can tell you that the case is more than that. And I can't go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now. So, again, I think So you have seen direct Evidence of collusion.
I don't wanna go into specifics, but I will say that there is evidence that is not circumstantial, and, and is very much worthy of investigation. So
Speaker 1: Is there has been a report from CNN that, Wednesday night that there that the FBI was looking into collusion, with the Russians in the Trump campaign in terms of spreading information about Hillary Clinton's campaign. Is Do you have any information to back that up?
Speaker 0: I'm not sure that I can comment on that. I can't say that I think that the investigation that the director talked about at our Monday hearing, is justified. I think there is a sufficient basis for that investigation, not to only have been initiated, but for it to continue at this point. And I don't have a concern with other members characterizing the evidence as they have. And many of them have said they think there's no evidence of collusion.
My disagreement with those members is I don't think that's accurate and I feel an obligation to say so. So they can call it a fishing expedition. They can call it a witch hunt. It's all in a line message with the White House. But nonetheless, real evidence is coming forward that just can't be ignored.
So we do know a lot more. I I think the claims that there was no evidence of collusion have long since fallen away. The question now is what is the the Quantum of proof here. Christopher Steele may have found out even before our own intelligence agencies that the Russians were in fact aiming to help Donald Trump in the election. That has now been borne out by ample evidence, in I think you see the most palpable evidence of a collusion in terms violating the Logan Act.
Look, I don't think you can seriously argue that the Russians weren't trying to help Trump and hurt Clinton, as well as so discord in the United States. The evidence is quite overwhelming on this. It was the early conclusion of the intelligence community, but that's only been furthered by all of the evidence We've seen in our investigation and put out a statement in
Speaker 2: a report basically saying that they found no evidence of collusion between the Trump team, and the Russian government. Have Democrats found any evidence of collusion?
Speaker 0: Yes. We have.
Speaker 3: Can you agree that there has been no evidence of Collusion coordination or conspiracy that has been presented thus far between the Trump campaign and Russia?
Speaker 0: No. I don't agree with that at Well, I think there's plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight. That it is very possible that the best evidence, is yet to But look, you can see evidence in plain sight, on the issue of collusion. George, there's ample evidence of collusion, of the campaign and it's
Speaker 3: The senate intel Chairman also said at this point, no evidence of collusion at this point. Have you seen do you have direct evidence of collusion with Russia?
Speaker 0: Well, I think there is direct evidence. While there is abundant evidence of collusion, but as I have said along there is Plenty of evidence of collusion and you said on this show and others that there's direct evidence of collusion. Were you wrong about that now that you've seen the summary of the Tesla Council's report? No. Because I was saying no collusion.
Speaker 3: Your evidence. You've been saying that on TV for years.
Speaker 0: Well, I will tell you and we and I've also been saying as you know that the evidence is in plain sight.