TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @everymanreport
@everymanreport - Everyman
@SamParkerSenate @elonmusk Hey @elonmusk get a load of these guys! This took me less than one minute to find. #ZionistPrivilege https://t.co/8f3UG3Py2S
@everymanreport - Everyman
@RadioGenoa What did they die for? 🇬🇧 🇺🇸 https://t.co/Rx3u13yVDy
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the early 20th century, soldiers fought for England and Britain, not for tolerance or inclusion. They fought for glory, pride, and the future their rulers promised. The sacrifices made in wars were not for a multicultural or politically correct society, but for a different vision of society that is now deemed unacceptable to mention.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now earlier in the 20th century, our fathers and grandfathers were told that they fought. They fought against Germany. They fought against fascism. They fought against Imperial Germany in the first war between 1914 and 18. You may have seen some of the very elderly veterans who were basically dying now.
93, 89, 96, 109, 106, 104. As these men went over the top in 1914, 18, in Flanders Fields, at the Somme, at Passchendaele, at Gipe, and elsewhere, when men got out of their tanks and fried an egg on the side of it in the North African desert in the 2nd war? Were they fighting for tolerance and inclusion? Were they fighting for mister Finnick to impose laws of upon them here in the north of England and elsewhere to describe what they can say even in private, even in a text message between friends, even in an office, in the public, or in the private sector? No.
They weren't fighting for tolerance and inclusion. They were fighting for glory. They were fighting for this country. They were fighting for England and Britain. They were fighting for what their old rulers had told them about what the future would be like if they not.
They were fighting for a degree of racial and ethnic pride that was unstated because, the whole English confectors, which didn't really go on about that because it was accepted as a norm to begin with. And therefore, you didn't need to illustrate it too much because it was a given before you even started. They were fighting for the flags that were behind them. Many of them didn't know what was coming and certainly didn't know that the Great War was a form of mechanized death in which we would lose 800,000 men. 800,000.
And look around this country now. What did they die for? And what, and many more made and injured on top of that core 800,000. That's just in the first one. What did they die for?
Did they die for a multicultural Britain? Did they die for a multiethnic Britain? Did they die for a politically correct Britain? Did they die for 200,000 abortions a year? Did they die for the absence of the death penalty?
Did they die of the liberal censorship that denies the rights even of a private conversation up to a certain perspective? Did they die for the rights of men to marry each other and adopt children? Did they die for all of these things? Or did they actually fight for something different? I've, had the guest that they actually fought for a society that we had a proportion of, but which has now been dipped down to such a degree that even to mention it is incorrect.
Is transgressive, is anti system, is mentally criminal or treated largely as such.