reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @f_leclerc20037
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my thoughts on the recent impeachment attempt against Trump, highlighting the hypocrisy of the Democrats. Victor Hanson pointed out that while Obama dropped thousands of bombs without congressional approval, there was no outrage from Democrats. In contrast, they reacted strongly to Trump’s actions, driven by personal animosity. I noted that while they focus on Trump, pressing issues like homelessness and border security are ignored. This isn't just about politics; it's a moral battle for truth and integrity. We must stand against lies and uphold justice.
@f_leclerc20037 - Francois Leclerc
🚨 HYPOCRISY EXPOSED: 128 DEMOCRATS SAID “NO” TO TRUMP’S IMPEACHMENT — HERE’S THE REAL REASON Victor @VDHanson didn’t hold back. He laid out what many Americans have felt for years: 👉 The modern @DNC Party has lost all moral clarity. This latest attempt to impeach President Trump—the third one—didn’t just fail. It collapsed under the weight of its own hypocrisy. 🔍 THE TRUTH THEY WANT YOU TO FORGET: 1️⃣ OBAMA DROPPED 26,000 BOMBS IN A SINGLE YEAR (2016) Across Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen. ➡️ No vote in Congress. ➡️ No approval from the American people. ➡️ No impeachment. ➡️ No Democrat outrage. On his last day in office, Obama ordered B-2 bombers to fly over 5,000 miles from Missouri to Libya for one last strike. Not a single Democrat objected. 2️⃣ @POTUS TRUMP STRIKES A SINGLE TERROR TARGET... AND THE LEFT LOSES ITS MIND They didn’t care about law or policy—just personal hatred. They used smut, slander, and shameless theatrics. And still... 128 Democrats voted against the impeachment. Why? Because Pelosi and Jeffries knew the optics were damning. "They remembered the clips. They remembered the bombs. They remembered Obama never asked permission. And they knew the public would remember too." – VDH 3️⃣ DOMESTIC COLLAPSE IGNORED While they chase @realDonaldTrump, here’s what they’re not doing: No answers for the homeless crisis in Democrat-run cities No solutions for 12 million illegal aliens—many criminals—protected in sanctuary cities No effort to deliver affordable gas, housing, or safety No strategy to defend the border or our neighborhoods All they care about is destroying the man who dared to put America first. 4️⃣ IRAN: PAPER TIGER... YET THE DEMOCRATS ALIGNED WITH THEM Iran has no real military power. It lost its war with Saddam. Its only weapon is terrorism by proxy. And yet, some of @TheDemocrats chose to side with them—just to hurt Trump. Let that sink in. They would rather weaken America than admit Trump was right. ⚔️ THE REAL WAR IS MORAL This isn’t about foreign policy. This is about character. About honesty. About truth. When Obama broke the rules, they cheered. When Trump followed them, they screamed. And when @SpeakerPelosi and @RepJeffries saw the fallout coming, they silently backed away. You can’t run a country on hate. You can’t uphold justice with double standards. America deserves better than this political theater. We need leaders who value truth over tribalism — and morality over manipulation. “Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil...” – Isaiah 5:20 🛑 We will not be silent. 🗽 We will expose their lies. 🇺🇸 We will defend the truth. ✝️ We will speak in the name of Jesus Christ and stand for the soul of this nation.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Representative Al Green introduced articles of impeachment against Donald Trump for a third time, but 128 House Democrats voted against it. Nancy Pelosi and Hakeem Jeffries knew it was hypocritical, citing Barack Obama dropping 26,000 bombs in 2016 without congressional approval. On Obama's last day in office, B-2 bombers bombed Libya.
Democrats' opposition to Trump is hypocritical and ignores important issues. They focus on opposing Trump instead of addressing affordable housing, safe streets, and secure borders. Some Democrats recognize this impeachment is contradictory and fodder for campaign messages.
Predictions of World War III were unfounded. Russia is bogged down in war, and China relies on the Strait of Hormuz for oil. Iran, a paper tiger with no military ability, is supported by few countries like North Korea and Venezuela. Some Democrats, in trying to embarrass Trump, aligned with lunatic regimes, indirectly helping Iran.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's under kind of a volatile and unhinged representative Al Green introduced articles of impeachment in an effort to impeach Donald Trump for a third time. And this one was strange because a 128 Democrats of the house voted against him. You know why that was? Nancy Pelosi and Hakim Jeffries knew that that was hypocritical. Barack Obama, in the single year, 02/2016, he dropped 26,000 bombs.
He didn't think he had to go to the congress to ask permission. On the last day that Barack Obama was in office, he took the b two bombers, probably some of the same pilots, ordered them take off from Missouri, and they flew to Libya, and they bombed Libya. Nobody in the house on the democratic side said a thing. Hello. This is Victor Davis Hanson for the Daily Signal.
The Democrats under kind of a volatile and unhinged representative Al Green introduced articles of impeachment in an effort to impeach Donald Trump for a third time. Remember, there were two successful impeachments, but, of course, they failed to get a conviction in the senate during Trump's first term. And this one was strange because a 128 Democrats of the house caucus voted against it. And so Al Green and AOC and Rashida Tlaib and Ilian Omar and all of these people that were affiliates for the squad and the radical fringe couldn't even get a majority of Democrats. And you know why that was?
Think about it for the re for a reason. One of them was was that Chuck Schumer in the Senate and Nancy Pelosi, who's not speaker, but she still has influence on Hakim Jeffries, the speaker, who voted against the resolution said, wait a minute. You gotta remember that if we do this, we're gonna get killed by clips every day during the midterms. And those clips are gonna show Barack Obama in the single year, 02/2016. He dropped 26,000 bombs.
And it wasn't just in Syria. It wasn't just in Iraq. It wasn't just in Afghanistan. He dropped them in Libya. He dropped them in Somalia.
He dropped he dropped them in Yemen. 26,000 bombs, and they all had one thing in common. He didn't think he had to go to the congress to ask permission. Why did he think that? I don't think he was legally required to, but there was a political reason.
At that time, in 02/2016, he had no majority in the house. He was down over 40 seats, and he had no majority in the senate. And had he gone and said, I'm the mad bomber, and I've been bombing Libya from 2011 to 2016 without your approval, and I wanna keep doing it. I've dropped 26,000 bombs this year. I wanna keep bombing.
They would have said no. It's partisan, maybe. And so Nancy Pelosi and Haikum Jeffries knew that that was hypocritical. On the last day, as I said earlier, the last day that Barack Obama was in office, he knew that was Trump was coming in, and he knew that he had to go out with a bang, so he took the b two bombers, probably some of the same pilots. And he ordered them to take off from Missouri, and they flew 5,000 miles longer to Libya, and they bombed supposed terrorist elements of this Libya chaotic mess that he had created by bombing it earlier in 02/2011.
Nobody in the house on the democratic sides said a thing. So there were this opposition is really hurting the Democrats because it's so hypocritical, but more importantly, it's an act of omission. You want to say to them, Nancy Pelosi, Haikum Jeffries, AOC, what's the status of homeless people in your district? What's what do you what do you wanna do with illegal immigrants? Do you think you brought them in, 12,000,000 of them, and they're here illegally.
Why would you have sanctuary cities that protect even the criminal element? Why would you not wanna deport them when 54% of the American people do? In other words, they're not paying any attention to what people want, affordable housing, affordable gas, affordable energy, safe streets, secure borders, deterrent foreign policy, none of that. All they're doing is saying if Donald Trump does something, we are going to be irate. We're going to use pornography.
We're going to use smutty language, and we're going to oppose him, and now we're going to impeach him. And some people in that party said, this is so unhinged. It's so contradictory. It's so paradoxical. It's so hypocritical.
It's just fodder for campaign messages and every purple house rate in two years. Don't do it. So it was it was a surprise. And as far as people on the right to finish, we were told that thirty thousand people were gonna die from some of our close friends in the mega group. We were told this was going to be World War three.
And then you would want you wanted to say to yourself, well, who would do that? Who would do that? Who would who would start World War three? Russia? Russia's bogged down in a theater wide war.
It's lost a million dead wounded. It's not gonna do anything. Well, China. China. China.
China's got about 500 or 800 nuclear weapons. We have about 60,000 6,000 or 7,000 that could be deliverable very quickly. But more importantly, China's oil comes out Of The Straits Of Hormuz. They don't want. They don't wanna go in there.
They don't want to send anything to Iran. And finally, our people who impeach Donald Trump should remember a great truth. One of the subtext of this entire war, I should say two, Iran was a complete paper tiger. It had never any military ability. It had almost lost the war against Saddam Hussein from '80 to '88.
It sued for peace. Its only method of hurting people was through third party terrorists. It had no military capability to speak of, and yet it scared seven or eight presidents. That was number one. And finally, Iran is the most hated country in the world, theocracy is.
So when we had this strike and the aftermath, the only people who were voicing support were people like North Korea, Venezuela, and that's about it. Anybody else basically said, well, I don't like The United States, and I don't like Europe, but these people are crazy, and I do not want them to get a bomb. So they have no support, and they weren't militarily capable. And the only people who fail to see that and indirectly by this impeachment were trying to help Iran were whom? Our own Democratic Party, at least a minority of them.
76 or 73 of our Democratic colleagues in the house wanted to embarrass Donald Trump and line up on the side with a few lunatic regimes that did not even include Russia and China and others of that ilk. Thank you very much. This is Victor Davis Hanson for the Daily Signal.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent exchange, President Trump confronted CNN's Kaitlan Collins over her question about returning a known MS-13 terrorist to the U.S. Trump highlighted that the individual was legally deported under federal law and criticized CNN for promoting chaos rather than asking responsible questions. He emphasized the importance of enforcing laws to protect Americans and noted that even President Bukele of El Salvador questioned the logic behind smuggling a terrorist back. Trump reaffirmed his commitment to leadership and the rule of law, asserting that no version of this situation should allow the terrorist to return.
@f_leclerc20037 - Francois Leclerc
🦅🇺🇸 REAL LEADERSHIP VS MEDIA CHAOS 📽️ Video: @POTUS Trump exposes @CNN @kaitlancollins for suggesting a terrorist be returned to America CNN isn’t asking questions. They’re lobbying for chaos. During a recent exchange, Kaitlan Collins of CNN demanded to know why President Trump wouldn’t “return” a known MS-13 terrorist to the United States — a man: 🔺 Found guilty by two immigration courts 🔺 Declared a member of a foreign terrorist organization 🔺 Deported legally under U.S. federal law When challenged, even President Bukele of El Salvador asked the obvious: “What do you want me to do—smuggle him into America?” Think about that. This wasn’t a slip. It was a window into the twisted mindset of today’s media. 🧠 Instead of protecting America… CNN wants a terrorist back on U.S. soil. They’re siding with gang members who rape little girls and murder innocents — all to take a swipe at President Trump. But the law was clear: ⚖️ The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 — no district judge can dictate U.S. foreign policy. Trump obeyed the law. CNN twisted it. President Trump stood firm, again. “No version of this ends with him living in the U.S.” “Why don’t you just say it’s a good thing we’re deporting criminals?” 👏 That’s leadership. 🛡️ That’s courage. And that’s exactly why we needed Trump back — to protect our people, enforce our laws, and end this dangerous clown show the media calls “news.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The administration addresses the case of a man deported to El Salvador, asserting he was in the U.S. illegally and identified by two courts as an MS-13 member. They state additional paperwork is needed and it's up to El Salvador if they want to return him.
The Supreme Court ruled that if El Salvador returns him, the U.S. would "facilitate it," meaning provide a plane. Officials emphasize that as an El Salvador citizen, his case is under El Salvador's jurisdiction. They highlight that MS-13 is a foreign terrorist organization, making him ineligible for immigration relief.
A district court's attempt to compel the administration to retrieve him was overturned 9-0 by the Supreme Court, affirming no court can dictate U.S. foreign policy. El Salvador's president stated he would not "smuggle a terrorist" into the U.S. Officials accuse some media outlets of misrepresenting the situation and favoring foreign terrorists.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Low rated anchor at CBP.
Speaker 1: Thank you, president. Have you any to ask president McCurley to help return the man who your administration says was mistakenly deported the man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador?
Speaker 0: Well, let me ask Pam. Would you ask to answer that question?
Speaker 2: Sure, president. First and foremost, he was illegally in our country. He had been illegally in our country. And in 2019, '2 courts, an immigration court and an appellate immigration court ruled that he was a member of MS thirteen and he was illegally in our country. Right now, it was a paperwork.
It was additional paperwork had needed to be done. That's up to El Salvador if they want to return him. That's not up to us. The Supreme Court ruled president that if as El Salvador wants to return him, this this is international matters, foreign affairs. If they wanted to return him, we would facilitate it, meaning provide a plane.
Speaker 1: So will you return?
Speaker 0: And you are doing a great job.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 3: Well, just think I was thinking about it. Wait a minute.
Speaker 0: Can you just also respond to that question? Because, you know, it's asked by CNN and they always ask it with a slant because they're totally slanted because they don't know what's happening. That's why nobody's watching them. But would you answer that question also, please?
Speaker 4: Yes. Gladly. So as Pam mentioned, there's a illegal alien from El Salvador. So with respect to you, he's a citizen of El Salvador. So it's very arrogant even for American media to suggest that we would even tell El Salvador how to handle their own citizens as a starting point.
As two immigration courts found that he was a member of MS thirteen. When president Trump declared MS thirteen to be a foreign terrorist organization, that meant that he was no longer eligible under federal law, which I'm sure you know. You're very familiar with the INA, that he was no longer eligible for any form of immigration relief in The United So he had a deportation order that was valid, which meant that under our law, he's not even allowed to be present in The United States and had to be returned because of the foreign terrorist designation. This issue was then by a district court judge completely inverted, and a district court judge tried to tell the administration that they had to kidnap a citizen of El Salvador and fly him back here. That issue was raised to the supreme court, and the supreme court said the district court order was unlawful and its main components were reversed nine zero unanimously, stating clearly that neither secretary of state nor the president could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen of El Salvador from El Salvador, who again is a member of MS thirteen, which is I'm sure you understand, rapes little girls, murders women, murders children, is engaged in the most barbaric activities in the world.
And I can promise you if he was your neighbor, you would move right away.
Speaker 1: So you don't plan
Speaker 3: to pass that that? And what
Speaker 0: was the ruling, really? And the supreme court, Steve, was it nine to nothing?
Speaker 4: Yes. It was a nine zero
Speaker 0: In our favor?
Speaker 4: In our favor against the district court ruling saying that no district court has the power to compel the foreign policy function of The United States. As Pam said, the ruling solely stated that if this individual at El Salvador's sole discretion was sent back to our country, that we could deport him a second time.
Speaker 1: Well, I
Speaker 4: No version of this legally ends up with him ever living here because he is a citizen of El Salvador. That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about it per the court can only be directed to him.
Speaker 1: I I asked Can president Bukele weigh in on this? Do you plan to return him?
Speaker 3: Well, I suppose you have suggested that I smuggle a terrorist into The United States. How can I smuggle how can I return him to The United States? Like, could I smuggle him into The United States? Or what do I do? Of course, I'm not going to do it.
It's like, I mean, the question is preposterous. How can I smuggle a terrorist into The United States? I don't have the power to return him to The United States. But you can release him inside of some of them. Yeah.
But I'm not releasing I mean, we're not very fond of releasing terrorists into our country. We just turned the murder capital of the world into the safest country in the Western Hemisphere, you want us to go back into the releasing criminals so we can go back to being the murder capital of the world. No. That's that's not gonna be bad.
Speaker 0: Well, they'd love to have a criminal, you know, when
Speaker 3: you schedule it. I mean, mean, there's there's a fascination.
Speaker 0: They would love it. Yeah. They're sick these are sick people. Market, do you have something to say about that?
Speaker 5: Yeah. Mean, Steven Eiteland, it's I don't understand what the confusion is. This individual is a citizen of El Salvador. He was illegally in The United States and was returned to his country. That's where you deport people back to their country of origin, except for Venezuela that wasn't refusing to take people back or places like that.
I can tell you this, mister president. No. The foreign policy of The United States is conducted by the president of The United States, not by a court. And no court in The United States has a right to conduct the foreign policy of The United States. It's that simple.
End of story. And
Speaker 4: that's what the supreme court by the way, to Marco's point. The supreme court said exactly what Marco said, that no court has the authority to compel a foreign policy function in United States. We want a case nine zero, and people like CNN are portraying it as a loss as usual because they want foreign terrorists in the country who kidnap women and children. But president Trump, his policy is foreign terrorists that are here illegally get expelled from the country, which, by the way, is a ninety ten issue.
Speaker 1: Well, president mister president, you said that if the supreme court said someone needed to be returned, that you would abide by that. You said that on Air Force one just a few days ago. And they said that have to answer must be facilitated.
Speaker 0: Don't you just say, isn't it wonderful that we're keeping criminals out of our country? Why can't you just say that?
Speaker 4: What's a legal Why do you go
Speaker 0: over and over? And that's why nobody watches you anymore. You know, you have no credibility. Please go ahead.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my thoughts on a significant revelation by Elon Musk and Antonio Gracias regarding a potential scandal involving Social Security numbers issued to non-citizens. In 2021, 270,000 non-citizens had SSNs, which surged to over 2.1 million by 2024, all legally issued by the Biden administration without proper oversight. These numbers are linked to access to Medicaid, federal benefits, and even illegal voting. Musk's team traced this back to multiple federal agencies, suggesting a coordinated effort to reshape the voting landscape. The media seems to be ignoring this critical issue.
@f_leclerc20037 - Francois Leclerc
🚨 Elon Musk Just Dropped a Thermonuclear Truth Bomb @f_leclerc20037 While the media obsesses over meaningless drama, @elonmusk & Antonio Gracias just exposed what may be the biggest scandal in American political history — and it involves millions of Social Security numbers issued to non-citizens. 🧨 The numbers: 2021: 270,000 non-citizens had SSNs 2024: Over 2.1 million All issued legally by the Biden administration — no ID, no interviews, no oversight. 🧾 These SSNs are being used to access: Medicaid Federal benefits Even register to vote — yes, they found evidence of actual illegal voting. Musk’s team traced it back across multiple agencies: ➡️ Social Security ➡️ Homeland Security ➡️ Medicare/Medicaid ➡️ Border Patrol This wasn’t an accident. This was a coordinated federal effort to maximize inclusion, minimize collection, and reshape the voting map. 💬 “This was a deliberate attempt to create a permanent one-party state.” — Elon Musk 🤯 The team even uncovered 1.3 million of these individuals already on Medicaid, and others using benefits while some have already voted. Referrals have already been made to Homeland Security Investigations for prosecution. And where is the media? Silent. They’re busy running “Signal-gate” to distract from the truth. 🎥 Watch the clip — Elon lays it all out. No conspiracy. Just cold, hard data. If we don’t fix this, America as we know it is over.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Antonio Gracias and a colleague investigated Social Security fraud and discovered a surge in Social Security numbers issued to non-citizens, increasing from 270,000 in 2021 to 2,100,000 in 2024. They found that individuals entering the U.S., even illegally, can apply for work authorization and automatically receive a Social Security number without an interview or ID. The default settings in the system are set to maximize inclusion and benefits for these individuals. They also found 1,300,000 of them already on Medicaid. A sample was taken and some were found to be registered to vote and some had voted. These cases have been referred to the Home Ed Security Investigation Service for prosecution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My friend Antonio Gracias to the to the stage. I think so. Does work? I can give you mine. Does it work?
It'll be okay. Mean Buzz Aldrin is still alive and he's he went past the belts. It worked.
Speaker 1: Is this working? Yes. Yeah.
Speaker 0: There you go. Antonio, can you tell us you Antonio is helping out with the social security. So just trying to review social security where you may have heard that we found 20,000,000 dead people marked as alive in the Social Security database. This is so crazy. And then, you'll notice there's a strange trend here where how many Social Security numbers were issued.
It's do you want to
Speaker 1: Yeah. So let me me tell you what happened here. We we started at the top of the system.
Speaker 0: I think you're going to talk about a lot of
Speaker 1: We started at the top of the system mapping the whole system of social security to understand where all the fraud was. And there's a lot of great people there that showed us really a lot of waste. And so that came up with a big list of stuff they're working on. You've heard some that already. But this is what jumped out at us.
When we saw these numbers, we're like, what is this? In '21, you see 270,000 people goes all the way to 2,100,000 in '24. These are non citizens that are getting Social Security numbers.
Speaker 0: Yeah. This this is a mind blowing charge.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Just this this literally blew us away. Like, went there to find fraud, and we found this by accident. And this isn't political, by the way. My parents are immigrants.
Yeah. This country's been great to us. My brother and sister are all born in Spain. I'm pro legal immigration. This is not this is not political.
This is not political. This is about America and the future of America. And there are a lot of good people in the system that pointed this in this direction. I wanna I wanna honor them right now. They work in the government today who took risk to show us these numbers and tell us what's going on.
Yeah. So I wanna stop for a minute. I wanna tell I wanna honor those people today. Very good people. Very good people.
I have been from DC to Social Security offices to the border to track this down and very good people have helped us along the way. Wanna thank them.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: But what this is is when you come in the country, if you're illegal, there's a couple ways to come in. You come in through a port of entry and you can tell them you're afraid. You'll get they'll give you an asylum asylum case. You'll get an interview, then you get in. That's one way to do it.
Another way to do it is to just go to the border. Literally, happened. I talked to border patrol myself. Elon was there too. I went to Laredo and I went to Brownsville.
Elon went to Eagle Pass. You walk up to a border patrol officer and you tell them you wanna come in. They have a couple of choices. They could charge you with a misdemeanor or a felony under thirteen twenty five or they can make an administrative offense like a parking ticket basically. They were told to do that, make an administrative offense on the last administration.
And you could walk across the border, they do what's called a release in your own recognizance and they give you an NTA, a notice to appear, which appear to judge. The wait times on judges are like average six years. Look at Guroc, you'll see it on immigration judges. There's only 700 of them. This is 5,500,000 people.
Okay. So what happens then? Once you're in the country and you got asylum to one of these pathways, we map the whole thing out. You can apply for a work document. You file a seven six five.
It's the work form. You get this form called the seven six six. That's the authorization. And then Social Security Administration automatically sends you in the mail your Social Security number. No interview.
No ID.
Speaker 0: This is worth like just reiterating. It it it's not that it's not people sometimes think that under the Biden administration that that he was simply asleep at the switch. He wasn't asleep. They weren't asleep at the switch. It it it was a massive large scale program to import as many illegals as possible, ultimately to change the entire voting map of The United States and disenfranchise the the American people.
Permanent, deep blue, one party state from which there would be no escape.
Speaker 1: Look, if I hadn't seen this myself, I'm not sure I believed it. I went through it myself and mapped it. And Elon is right. This is true. The defaults in the system from Social Security to all of the benefit programs have been set to max inclusion, max pay for these people and minimum collection.
That's what's happening. We found 1,300,000 of them already on Medicaid as an example. We've gone through on every benefit program we went through, we found groups from this particular group of people, this 5,500,000 people in those benefit programs. And then what was really, really disturbing us was why. Asking ourselves why.
And so we actually just took a sample and looked at voter registration records. And we found people here registered to vote in this population. Yes.
Speaker 0: And who did vote?
Speaker 1: And and we found some by sampling that actually did vote. And we have referred them to prosecution at the Home Ed Security Investigation Service. Yeah. Already. Already.
That has already happened.
Speaker 0: This is what's known as a scandal. This
reSee.it AI Summary
I expose the radical chaos of the Left, highlighting Maxine Waters' claims that Trump wants a Civil War, despite her past encouragement of mob harassment. Pro-Hamas radicals recently stormed Trump Tower, supported by groups like Jewish Voices for Peace. The Left's agenda is clear: fund chaos, spread anti-Semitism, and undermine free speech. Meanwhile, Trump is restoring law and order, and illegal agitators will face consequences. Elon Musk is also targeted for his support of Trump. The Left is panicking, and we are committed to fighting for America!
@f_leclerc20037 - Francois Leclerc
🔥 @IngrahamAngle EXPOSES the Left's Radical Chaos 🔥 🚨 Maxine Waters is unhinged. The radical left is out of control. And Democrats are losing their grip. 🚨 🔴 Mad Maxine is now claiming @POTUS Trump wants a Civil War. The SAME woman who encouraged mobs to harass conservatives in public is now fear-mongering about “violence.” Trump stands for law and order. It’s the left that pushes chaos. 🔴 Pro-Hamas radicals stormed Trump Tower in NYC. Soros-funded groups like Jewish Voices for Peace are backing these lawless mobs. These activists hate America, hate Israel, and want open borders. They scream nonsense chants while destroying property and attacking police. 🔴 The Left’s Game Plan is Clear: ✔ Fund mobs to destabilize America ✔ Spread anti-Semitism under the guise of ‘activism’ ✔ Tear down Western civilization and silence free speech 💥 The truth? Trump is restoring law and order, and they HATE it. Illegal agitators WILL be deported. Pro-Hamas groups WILL be shut down. Americans will NOT tolerate this insanity! 🚨 Elon Musk is being TARGETED for backing Trump. He’s calling out the media’s lies and their push for violence. The left is making it clear—they want him silenced, just like Trump. They praise violent riots but attack anyone standing for free speech and American values. 🔥 Trump is back. The Left is panicking. And WE are fighting for America! 🔥 🔁 Repost if you stand against the radical left’s chaos and for a STRONG AMERICA! 🇺🇸
Video Transcript AI Summary
Maxine Waters is considered deranged for allegedly inciting harassment of Republicans. She believes Trump expects and is working toward a civil war. Trump, however, supposedly wants national harmony, which the far left allegedly despises because they loathe America, borders, and Israel, and justify Islamic terror.
Pro-Hamas protesters tried to take over Trump Tower and are considered incapable of debate, instead resorting to screaming, sign waving, property damage, and criminal trespass. These protesters are allegedly funded by groups associated with George Soros, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and anti-Israel foundations. Jewish Voices for Peace, which organized the Trump Tower sit-in, had to pay a federal penalty for misrepresenting itself in a COVID loan application.
The claim is that these protesters are driven by emotion and propaganda. Non-citizens supporting terrorists and fomenting hate will not be welcomed and could have their visas revoked. Elon Musk is also a target and claims the media is making him sound like it would be heroic to kill him. Violence and destruction of property are not acceptable forms of protest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Relevance. That's the focus of tonight's angle. Now during the first Trump term, she urged leftists to harass Republicans in public. And now at age 86, mad Maxine Waters is sounding even more deranged. The equivalent of someone who's just throwing a match on a spill of kerosene.
Speaker 1: I'm worried that Trump is on the edge of creating a civil war. I believe he expects violence. I believe he expects confrontation. I believe he's working toward a civil war. We're not gonna get goaded.
We're not gonna get tricked into that.
Speaker 0: Oh, she's out of her mind. Trump wants national harmony in a country united behind a new patriotic journey toward peace and prosperity for the middle class, for all Americans. But of course, nationhood itself, that's a threat to the far left. They despise America, and they don't even believe in borders. By extension, they loathe Israel and justify barbaric acts of Islamic terror.
Now we saw this play out today in Manhattan where the NYPD was forced to get up close and personal with pro Hamas loons who tried to take over Trump Tower. Now these protesters have zero ability to engage in an actual debate on issues like immigration or the war in Ukraine or our support for Israel. But they are masters at screaming, off key usually, sign waving, property damage, and criminal trespass. Most are borderline illiterate. Their chants don't even make sense.
I don't get that at all. Fox's Eric Shawn tried to engage with them. This is how that went.
Speaker 2: What are you protesting? Why are
Speaker 3: you here?
Speaker 4: We're here in the name of peace, and we're asking for Mahmoud to be released. He was taken illegally by the ICE Department. He was kidnapped by, the United States government. He
Speaker 0: The ICE Department. And the professors at Columbia are just as incapable of coherent thought. They don't know immigration law, but they try to pass themselves off as intelligent warriors for civil rights.
Speaker 5: His only offense has been exercising his constitutional rights to free speech and peaceful assembly. Now we're facing a horrifying reality that our own student, a member of the Columbia community, has become a political prisoner here in The United States.
Speaker 0: Only political prisoner would it be a conservative on the Columbia campus. Give me a break. If national security concerns are implicated, determined by our secretary of state, guess what? People with green cards, non citizens, can be sent packing, period. Read the law.
Now you may be wondering, who's actually behind these protests? Who's supporting them? Who's funding them? The Trump Tower sit in was organized by the group Jewish Voices for Peace. Now it has several chapters on college campuses across America, and it builds itself as a home for left leaning Jews.
It pushes the BDS movement, Boycott, Divest and Sanctions Against Israel, and it gets its biggest funding from groups associated with George Soros, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and the anti Israel Kaffin and Lannon foundations, that's just to name a few. Now remember Soros himself has his hands in many protest pots, stirring up a toxic brew of anti Semitism and anti Americanism. Jerusalem Post writer David Ben Bassat put it starkly. Soros and his organization pay funds to radical anti Israel organizations that fuel hatred and encourage protests on campuses across The United States. They're funded and organized by branches of Students for Justice in Palestine, SJP, supported by Soros, and other anti Israel organizations.
Oh, and here's another fun fact. Jewish Voices for Peace, JVP, had to pay a federal penalty of $677,000, back to the government, for misrepresenting itself in a COVID loan application. You know, basically not revealing that it's essentially, you know, does political stuff. It just does research. Yeah.
Right. But none of this matters. None of the facts matter to the crazies because these people don't care about the facts, and they don't really care about the law. This is all driven by emotion and by propaganda fed to them online and on college campuses, in the classroom and beyond. And if they could, a lot of these students would have majored in protesting.
And you get the feeling that many of these characters, for many of them protesting, is almost a substitute for socializing. It gives them a sense of belonging, a sense of community. It's their entire reason for being. You'll see the changes that have taken They're being lined up, put on buses, about a hundred or so arrested. I guess joining a book club just isn't, you know, intellectual enough for them.
I think Democrats are making a big mistake if they become identified with those people. It is not a winning message or a good look. Any noncitizen who is thinking of coming here to join the overthrow of the West cause, think again.
Speaker 3: If you tell us when you apply, hi. I'm trying to get into The United States on a student visa. I am a big supporter of Hamas. And by the way, I intend to come to your country as a student and rile up all kinds of anti Jewish student, anti Semitic activities. I intend to shut down your universities.
So we would deny your visa. If you actually end up doing that, once you're in this country on such a visa, we will revoke it. And if you end up having a green card, not citizenship, but a green card as a result of that visa while you're here and those activities, we're gonna kick you out.
Speaker 0: Good. The country will be better off. Here's the message. If you support terrorists and foment hate in the country, we're not gonna roll out the welcome mat for you, and we're not gonna take your abuse. That goes double for those torching Teslas as some form of twisted protest.
Speaker 2: We catch anybody doing it because they're harming a great American company. We're gonna catch them. And they're bad guys. They're the same guys that screw around with our our schools and universities. The same garbage.
Speaker 0: Of course, Musk knew what he was getting into when he volunteered to help Trump. Because he's effective and because he's knocking over their gravy train, he's the target de jour.
Speaker 6: I think I'm at the top of the list for a lot of homicidal maniacs. They're doing the same thing to me that they did to Trump Yeah. Which is that they're they're making it sound like, if you kill me, you're a hero. That's what they're doing is evil. If the legacy media is saying that I'm a Nazi and and that's all you read, then then that it's then you're kind of in like, well, he's Hitler.
We should assassinate Hitler, shouldn't we?
Speaker 0: He got it. A % correct. Violence is not protected by the First Amendment. And despite the left's love affair with Luigi Mangione, murderous acts are not an acceptable form of protest. The Democrats had better dial this back.
The rhetoric, the violence, the destruction of property. This isn't the Biden administration. They're playing with Trump now, and he's not gonna passively accept political arguments that come in the form of citizens being terrorized or property destroyed. And that's the angle.
reSee.it AI Summary
The media's attacks on Elon Musk and DOGE have reached a new low, resorting to racism and fabrications instead of engaging in factual debate. They question Musk's loyalty and citizenship while ignoring the influx of illegal migrants. Once admired, Musk is now targeted for helping Trump tackle government waste. The media's baseless smears, from calling him an antisemitic gangster to a national security threat, reflect their desperation as they lose grip on public opinion. It's time to expose their hypocrisy and lies as more people awaken to the truth.
@f_leclerc20037 - Francois Leclerc
🚨 The Left’s Meltdown Over DOGE & Elon Musk Hits a New Low 🚨 The Democrat media machine is spiraling out of control, now resorting to racism, smears, and outright fabrications to attack @elonmusk and @DOGE . Instead of debating facts, they question his citizenship, loyalty, and even throw out apartheid accusations—all because he dares to challenge their power and narrative. 🔴 @Gutfeldfox exposes the latest media insanity: ✔️ Democrats & media allies suddenly claim Musk is "not a real American"—yet have no problem letting millions of illegal migrants into the country. ✔️ The same liberals who once idolized Musk now smear him because he's helping Trump cut government waste and corruption through DOGE. ✔️ They have no real arguments, so they throw every baseless attack at the wall—first calling Musk an antisemitic gangster, then a pro-apartheid foreigner, and now a national security threat. Meanwhile, President Trump is standing with DOGE, pushing for real accountability and cutting the bloated, corrupt bureaucracy. The media's grip on public opinion is collapsing, and they know it. Their smears aren’t working anymore, and the American people see through the lies. Liberals want to deport Musk but keep MS-13? 🚨 They question his loyalty but never the thousands of unvetted migrants? 🤔 They protect George Soros but attack anyone who exposes corruption? The Democrat media complex is panicking because they’re losing control—and the people are waking up. Let’s keep exposing their hypocrisy, lies, and power-hungry agenda. 🔥 Watch the full video, share, and let’s keep the truth spreading! 🔥
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Democrats and the media are now resorting to racism to attack Doge, questioning Elon Musk's citizenship and loyalty to the United States, bringing up his South African background and falsely labeling him as pro-apartheid. They are also saying that he has "dual loyalties".
Despite this, Musk is working with President Trump to streamline the government and eliminate waste. Critics didn't express the same concerns about George Soros, who spent billions to undermine American strength.
Musk chose to build his companies and innovate in America, and is poised to solve rural broadband issues. Instead of attacking him, critics should engage with his policies. The American people support what Donald Trump is doing through Elon Musk, as he follows through on his promises.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Singing. They tried rallies, and now they're trying racism. The latest unhinged Democrat media attack on Doge has them questioning the citizenship of America's most prominent African American.
Speaker 1: Which country is he loyalty to? South Africa, Canada, or The United States?
Speaker 2: I don't want to rely upon the benevolence of an Elon Musk who grew up in in apartheid South Africa.
Speaker 3: Go back to South Africa. He's not a citizen. He came here illegally. Whose American citizenship is his third choice of citizenship.
Speaker 4: A pro apartheid South Africa billionaire. He was pro apartheid as I I understand it. This foreigner foreign agent, you know Right. An enemy of The United States. Now I'm getting some flack because I said that Musk was pro apartheid.
I don't really know for sure if he was.
Speaker 0: Sue the heck out of her. So they can whine all they want about Doge, but Musk is multiplying president Trump signing an EO directing all federal agencies to have a representative of Doge to oversee all spending. And forty seven is once again offering his seal of approval.
Speaker 5: We are having great success in slimming down our government. It's been really very successful, and some took payouts and buyouts and others, took other things, and some people were finding out don't even exist. We're finding that we have a lot of people that don't exist that people thought that did.
Speaker 0: Jesse, this is kind of amazing, not surprising Mhmm. But amazing. You know, you God forbid, say go back to Africa. Right? That's bad.
That's bad. But you can say
Speaker 3: say go back to Africa. No. You can't
Speaker 0: you shouldn't
Speaker 3: say it.
Speaker 0: You shouldn't say it.
Speaker 3: I would never say it.
Speaker 0: Neither would
Speaker 3: I. They keep moving the goalposts. I need to know what's racist and what not racist.
Speaker 0: You can say go back to South Africa. Just just one adjective.
Speaker 3: So I guess the democrats immigration policy is deport Elon Musk and keep MS 13. Mhmm. Liberals look like 16 year old girls here. Mhmm. They love Musk because of his cars, but now they hate him because of who he hangs out with.
Jessica, I have a feeling that when we do colonize Mars, Musk is not planting a South African flag. Okay? Everybody knows that. Questioning Elon's loyalty to this country after not questioning the thousands of unveiling Chinese, Muslims, Venezuelans who lay lead into the country is insane. They have no message.
First, Musk was an anti Semitic gangster. Then he was co president for a long time, then he's racist, and now he has dual loyalties. The Democrats used to have this awesome media machine where they could just destroy you with smears and lies, And that's broken, and it's not working anymore. So why don't they just say, you know what? His policies are bad.
This is not gonna be good for the American people, or maybe they can join the cause in getting rid of waste, fraud, and abuse. It's silly because this dual loyalty thing's ridiculous since you guys are constantly America last. You're always sending billions of dollars to state sponsors of terror. You're working with the cartels to invade the country. Didn't the other day you guys were cheering for America to lose to Mexico and Canada?
I believe that was Crockett not to be confused with Davey.
Speaker 0: Or Sonny's partner on Miami Vice. Yeah. Or is it Sonny Crockett? I can't remember, Dana. I'm too young for that show.
I know. You know, what is interesting, too, is how they didn't feel this way about George Soros, spent billions and billions to undermine American strength. But if you criticized George Soros, you were playing into the tropes of anti Semitism.
Speaker 6: Not only that, but do you remember that Ilhan Omar caused a multi week kerfuffle, including a for being censored in the House because she suggested the Jewish people in America have dual loyalties. Mhmm. Remember that, she almost got censored, even by Nancy That was like that was a huge deal. Now they're doing the same. Also, I think that President Trump is blessed with the dumbest opposition.
Mhmm. Right? They cannot figure out what their get their footing and part of it is what Jesse said is that their media operation has collapsed. But the other thing is, Elon Musk was bullied terribly. He was abused terribly, and he was able to get himself out of that.
And guess what? This is the other thing that kills me. He could live anywhere in the world, and he chose us. He chose America, and this is where he has his companies. This is where the innovation is coming from, and he single handedly is going to solve rural broadband.
Because for years, going back for years, we're figure out how are we gonna connect rural America to the Internet. And the Biden administration don't had all this money pledged for it, spend a bunch, never even dropped a cable. Now Starlink is going to be able to solve that problem for a much less price. So, I think that he Trump has terrible opposition. I do feel what Jesse said.
Argue with him on the merits, but if you look at what he has accomplished and overcome in his life, any of them would be proud of that person if his name wasn't Elon Musk.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Rural broadband.
Speaker 6: Yes, that's big issue.
Speaker 0: Is that like the Dixie Chicks?
Speaker 6: Very good. I like it.
Speaker 0: Jessica, I think you might agree with me on this is that it's another example of how identity politics, if it's in your if you filter everything through it, you end up being a tribalist just like the people you condemn. So it's like they just see Musk as South African go back to South Africa.
Speaker 1: I'm not even sure they really do because this would have come up a lot earlier. I feel like it's a moment of grasping at straws to feel fill fill the TV time, and it would be much easier to stick to the merits of the criticisms. I think these are exactly the kinds of immigrants that we can all agree that we want to have here to come and build companies, etcetera. But you can draw the line at having an unelected billionaire spent, what, $290,000,000 on the election, playing a pretty significant role in the government. And you look at what Doge has done, a lot of it is the smoke and mirrors that he says that he's cutting that he's not actually.
But you know there are thousands of Americans who have lost their jobs, some of them by mistake that he then has to run and try to give them their jobs back. You can talk about the support that he's yanking from veterans, everything from, you know, staffing at VAs, crisis hotlines. You can talk about people who protect our parks. You can talk about people who run these clinical trials. I mean, we are going to be kneecapped in terms of medical innovation
Speaker 0: because of the Wait. You just said he doesn't cut. You just start up. He's not it's all smoke and mirrors. He's not cutting anything.
Saying all And then you say, oh, he's cutting all these jobs. It's so interesting. You didn't really care about all the people who lost their jobs during COVID, did you, Jessica?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I did. Think I did.
Speaker 0: Roll the tape of her not caring. No. It's not it's not
Speaker 1: it doesn't work that well with me because I do have moments of sanity, and I am being consistent here in all of this. But the the American people understand that whether they agree with the larger premise getting rid of waste, fraud, and abuse, that that isn't what's happening here. They know what the nineteen nineties looked like. They know what happened when we actually worked with congress over the course of can you turn? Oh, Charlemagne.
Speaker 2: That just happened.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It did just happen.
Speaker 6: What are you
Speaker 1: looking at? Charlemagne? She's watching The Breakfast Club. Anyway, the nineteen nineties is how you do it, not what Elon Musk is doing.
Speaker 0: Well, you know what's interesting is that, judge, you hear from so many people who don't know how businesses work, that you have to make big cuts, and this happens in every company.
Speaker 2: Well, why didn't they say anything about the 400,000 people who lost their jobs when Bill Clinton was president? Why didn't they Yeah. That was in the ninth. And why
Speaker 1: But they actually went through agency by agency
Speaker 2: and made Oh, they did it better. I'm sorry. My turn. They did it better back then. Here's the thing.
You've got a congresswoman. I've never heard of her before. Marcy Capter. This is a woman who is questioning Elon Musk, a legal immigrant who followed the rules, but she supported 11,000,000 illegals not following the rules, disregarding the laws, and coming into the country so we can educate them, medicate them, house them, and make sure that they're happy here. Alright?
I don't know how this woman belongs in congress. And this whole idea, you you know, with Sonny Haston, he's from South Africa. What was he supposed to do? Come out of his mother's womb and say, ma, I don't like it here. We gotta leave South Africa.
I mean, this is so stupid. It really is. And in the end, you know, the American people you talk about the American people, they absolutely support what Donald Trump is doing through Elon Musk. Seventy percent of them say he's following through on
Speaker 1: his promise. Okay. And George Soros.
Speaker 0: But it's a
Speaker 2: real poll.
Speaker 0: Well, it's not AstroTurf like those town halls.
Speaker 2: That's George Soros.
Speaker 1: No. Don't wait home about those quote unquote ask. Watch the interview with Mike Johnson last night with Caitlin Collins about these astrotors
Speaker 2: Caitlin Collins, now there's a good one.
Speaker 1: Is this Michael. Of Daily Caller Jane.
Speaker 2: Notice that the liberals are so clueless that you've got the protesters and the congress people in unison saying the same thing. I mean, they just must meet at the end of a block somewhere in somebody's house and say, we all have to say the same thing and George will give us money and we can all protest, and then we'll make sure that Donald Trump never wins again. They are so clueless and
Speaker 1: It can't win again. It is done now.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by recent allegations involving the CIA and FBI. The CIA reportedly warned CNN that it might sell state secrets to Russia if its funding is cut, which feels like blackmail and a betrayal of national security. Additionally, an FBI insider claims the bureau is destroying evidence related to Epstein and other significant cases, suggesting a severe abuse of power. These agencies seem more focused on preserving their influence than serving the public. We need thorough investigations and transparency to ensure the truth is revealed.
@f_leclerc20037 - Francois Leclerc
🚨 BREAKING: CIA & FBI SCANDAL UNFOLDS 🚨 The intelligence agencies that were supposed to protect America are now at the center of a massive betrayal. 🔴 The CIA has allegedly warned CNN that if their funding is cut, they may sell state secrets to Russia. This is blackmail, plain and simple—threatening national security because they fear losing their unchecked power and influence. 🔵 An FBI insider claims that the bureau is actively destroying evidence—possibly related to Epstein and other high-profile cases. If true, this would be one of the most egregious abuses of power in American history. Think about what this means: 🔹 The CIA is admitting that its loyalty isn't to America but to its own power and survival. 🔹 The FBI is covering up crimes instead of investigating them. 🔹 The same agencies that pushed Russiagate, censored Hunter Biden's laptop, and lied about election fraud are now facing exposure—and they are panicking. If these claims are true, we are dealing with an intelligence community that is no longer serving the people—it is actively working against them. This isn’t about "conspiracy theories." This is about protecting our country from unelected bureaucrats who believe they are above the law. 🔥 Investigations must happen. Transparency is a must. The American people deserve the TRUTH. 🔥