TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @fijcowitz8200

Saved - March 12, 2025 at 10:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am calling out Jessica Tisch for her role as NYPD Commissioner, suggesting it allows her father to collaborate with ICC Chairman Dorothy Tananbaum on questionable activities involving Israeli intelligence and American students. I’ve included various influential figures connected to this situation, highlighting their ties to organizations like the Foundation for Jewish Culture and Sesame Workshop. My message is clear: resign voluntarily or face removal. This network of connections raises serious concerns about loyalty and integrity.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

JESSICA TISCH: Your appointment as NYPD Commissioner serves as cover so your dad can work closely w/ICC Chairman Dorothy Tananbaum, where Israeli intel funds, collaborates & conducts illegal espionage ops on American students w/ICC. Resign or we’ll seek to forcefully remove you. https://t.co/2xRLPSlRI3

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

1. This is just un-fucking-acceptable. It simply will not be allowed to continue from now on. 2. Hey, there’s our friend ARNON MILCHAN from New Regency and the “LEKEM”, Israel’s “STEAL AMERICA’S NUCLEAR SECRETS” op! *He ties in the LOBACH fam & that plane/helicopter collision! https://t.co/FIUp9pDj03

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Jessica, Just so you don’t think I’m picking on you, I also went ahead and included Dorothy Tananbaum, James Tisch (your dad) and Andrew Tisch (your uncle). https://t.co/PAsNKkclZl

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Here’s Ann Rubenstein Tisch too, your Uncle Andrew’s wife, from Sesame Workshop, Jewish Communal Fund and UJA (Mossad). And here’s… 👹Jerry Speyer *Chair Emeritus of Columbia University *Chair Emeritus of Partnership for NYC *Chair Emeritus of Tishman Speyer *Chairman of NYPH https://t.co/TwQdYgnyiS

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Jessica, For good measure, I included Dorothy’s husband, Andrew Tananbaum, and the Foundation for Jewish Culture where they’re both heavily involved. *PS: Please ask Dorothy which of these numbers she prefers we use to call and schedule an in-person meeting with her. https://t.co/EsGX2WZNGJ

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Oh, almost forgot… I included Lynn (Korda) Kroll too, since she’s a Board Member of Foundation for Jewish Culture and is at that same event with Dorothy. She’s the former VICE CHAIRMAN of UJA, where your father was CHAIRMAN. Lynn is married to Jules Kroll of Kroll/K2 Integrity. https://t.co/59g8auBXGK

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

But yeah, quick reminder: Either resign from @NYPDPC of your own volition, you fucking traitorous spy terrorist, or we’ll do everything in our power to MAKE you leave that role. Cheers, bitch.✌️🇺🇸🫡

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

PS: Here’s Dorothy’s husband, Andrew, at AHT, at White Oak Commercial Finance, at Reverence Capital Partners and as Board Assistant and Treasurer of the Innocence Project. At Innocence Project, Andrew Tananbaum works for Founder’s Circle Members, Valerie Jarrett & Bill Ackman.🤣 https://t.co/6CLqLeE7LG

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Speaking of Sesame Workshop and Valerie Jarrett, here’s THESE inconvenient little receipts: ✅Valerie Jarrett *Sesame Workshop, Trustee *Obama Foundation, CEO *Whatever the Fuck Party This is With Podesta https://t.co/1njilfv7nK

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Btw, who’s the dude beside Valerie Jarrett at Sesame? Looks familiar.🤔 Ah, yes. Varun Chandra. *Ex-MP of Hakluyt (East India Co), the UK private intel firm founded by MI6, who now works for Starmer. *Before Hakluyt, he was personal PE Advisor to UK Prime Minister Tony Blair. https://t.co/l1XSXpxgmh

Saved - March 12, 2025 at 9:23 PM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Jewish Federations of North America (JFNA) is the parent org of UJA-Federation (Mossad). Hopefully, JFNA/UJA/Mossad will no longer be operating with carte blanche in America by then.

@disclosetv - Disclose.tv

NEW - Obama’s former chief of Staff and Biden's ambassador to Japan, Rahm Emanuel, plans to run for president in 2028 — POLITICO https://t.co/mCqhnnvgsO

Saved - March 12, 2025 at 8:05 PM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

This is clear intent to use AI subvert the United States, destroy the White race and create a world that sustains Jew supremacy.

@BATMAN_SPOTTED - BATMAN

Who do you think programmed Grok? https://t.co/5JozKPXD4a

Saved - March 12, 2025 at 8:54 AM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Maui, Lahaina and Booz Allen Hamilton *Massive shoutout to @TrueNorth444!🔥 (Check those dates.)

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Yep. Now we’re getting somewhere.

@DMichaelTripi - Dominic Michael Tripi

@HonestAlways2 https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2025/03/11/maui-police-chief-named-sean-diddy-combs-lawsuit-alleged-co-conspirator/?outputType=amp

Maui police chief named in Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs lawsuit as alleged co-conspirator In a nearly 90-page civil lawsuit, Maui Police Chief John Pelletier is accused of being hired as security for Combs in 2018 and for co-conspiring a cover-up. hawaiinewsnow.com
Saved - March 11, 2025 at 10:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I stumbled upon some old face pictures and realized Yair has a new business in New Haven, CT, called Y.N. ISRAEL HERITAGE LLC, with addresses on Front Street and Pardee Street. I also discovered that the seller of the annex was Sim Levenhartz, linked to Gan Eden Chadash LLC. Interestingly, I found Sim's address on 19 April Street, which is near the West Haven Yacht Club. This property was transferred to an invisible party in May 2022. I can be quite clumsy sometimes!

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Whoops, forgot I had these face pics. Yair has a new business/property in New Haven, CT. Y.N. ISRAEL HERITAGE LLC. (Business address) 315 FRONT STREET NEW HAVEN, CT 06513 & Y.N. ISRAEL HERITAGE LLC. (Annex/Assigned) 75 PARDEE STREET NEW HAVEN, CT 06513 I’m so clumsy at times. https://t.co/M36VGeuv2h

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Be a shame if Americans used facial recognition and identified everyone in that Shin Bet crew guarding the residence of Netanyahu’s son in Miami. Could you imagine if we found out some of them even had their own addresses and families here on American soil too? A real shame.🫡

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

*The seller of the ANNEX was SIM LEVENHARTZ, from his holding company, Gan Eden Chadash LLC, which is listed at 33 DIXWELL AVENUE, STE 321 in NEW HAVEN, CT. https://t.co/I81UCy8yfo

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Oh, darn it. Accidentally found SIM LEVENHARTZ in NEW HAVEN, CT. 19 April Street New Haven, CT 06516 Whomever has THIS house now lives right beside the West Haven Yacht Club. Imagine that. Transferred to an invisible party on May 6, 2022. https://t.co/yBFI5L2qFA

Saved - March 11, 2025 at 9:24 PM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Be a shame if Americans used facial recognition and identified everyone in that Shin Bet crew guarding the residence of Netanyahu’s son in Miami. Could you imagine if we found out some of them even had their own addresses and families here on American soil too? A real shame.🫡

Saved - March 11, 2025 at 8:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been discussing the connections between various individuals and organizations involved in pro-Israel advocacy, particularly focusing on Johannah King-Slutzky and Marissa Streit. King-Slutzky's roles at Columbia and her union involvement are highlighted, alongside accusations against her and others of manipulating elections for Israeli interests. I express frustration over the rise of antisemitism and the perceived threats posed by these groups to American college students. I also raise serious allegations regarding their involvement in illegal activities and call for accountability from our leaders.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

JOHANNAH KING-SLUTZKY *Instructor & PhD student at COLUMBIA & convenient op/target for ADAM MILSTEIN’S CANARY MISSION. *MILSTEIN: Founded/funded Canary Mission, Shirion Collective, IAC & PragerU. *MARISSA STREIT: IDF Unit 8200 Officer, CEO of PragerU & was IAC Director of Ops.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

REMINDER: Goldman Sachs funded fake “pro-Hamas” protests on college campuses, then Mossad, Israeli Ministry of Strategic Affairs and Israel on Campus Coalition spied on American students and threatened to ruin their futures if they had insufficiently pro-Israel responses. War.🫡

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

What they DIDN’T tell ya about JOHANNAH KING-SLUTZKY is: 💥She’s a UNION MEMBER & NEGOTIATOR for UAW at COLUMBIA. 💥She was DIGITAL DIRECTOR of ARENA (MOSSAD) — the KLEINER PERKINS/JDCA/UJA apparatus LAUNDERING ACTBLUE MONEY & STEALING OUR ELECTIONS for ISRAELI/JEWRY INTERESTS.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

REFRESH: ARENA, JDCA/UJA/MOSSAD, KLEINER PERKINS, ACTBLUE & ELECTIONS. REID HOFFMAN LinkedIn Snowflake (Partners w/Arena & http://IMPACTIVE.io) PayPal/Chabad Bloomberg/Mossad SNOWFLAKE Columbia Qualcomm (JFNA/Mossad) Palo Alto Ntwks (Unit 8200) Civis Analytics (SBF/FTX/GBF)

Impactive | All-in-One Digital Organizing Suite Impactive is an all-in-one suite of tools for organizing, outreach, and engagement. We empower progressive campaigns and causes to fundraise, share their stories and actions, get out the vote, and much more. Impactive has a long history of building movements online: Biden/Harris 2020, Planned Parenthood, Community Change, and over 1,000 other partners sent more than 150 million messages during the 2020 election cycle. impactive.io

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

STREIT: “The Fight for Israel is a Fight for American Values” - 05/02/24 (No, it isn’t.) “If you are shocked by the recent rise in antisemitism and anti-Israel activity in America, I invite you to look at the big picture.” No, I invite YOU to get some fucking introspection. https://t.co/uvh7b3ZdIB

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

ALSO STREIT: Grew up in Israel, served in IDF Unit 8200, moved back to America ONE YEAR before 9/11 to “take classes” at LA Mossad hub, UCLA, was Director of Ops for IAC/Milstein and is now CEO of PragerU. She & Chabad Chaya install ‘PragerU Judeo-Christian’ bullshit in schools. https://t.co/U68e9YD7Of

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

RAICHIK, STREIT, MILSTEIN, JKS, LINDEN and ALL OTHER OPERATIVES must be tracked down/arrested: Shirion & Canary are Israeli intel-linked ‘doxx and destroy’ accounts seeking to ruin anyone insufficiently pro-Israel. They work closely w/Streit & Raichik against non-Jew Americans. https://t.co/gOyc334qPF

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

PS: Evidence STRONGLY suggests Shirion Collective is also involved in the trafficking of kids/drugs/weapons between Medellin, Columbia, Durango, Colorado and Gainesville, Florida. And all with the generous support of the Sinaloa Cartel, Chabad Lubavitch, the CIA (IQT) and Mossad. https://t.co/IBGa0MBVDJ

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

NOTE: Although the original post about King-Slutzky was already deleted, we caught a screenshot of it just in time. I’m pretty sure someone realized the huge can of worms they were opening on themselves after they’d posted it and gave them ‘the call’ to ‘shut it down’ ASAP lmao. https://t.co/d2UJdPXI8E

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

*BOTTOM LINE: American COLLEGE KIDS should NOT have to LIVE, DEAL WITH or TRY TO LEARN while surrounded by ISRAELI MOSSAD ESPIONAGE/EXTORTION HORSESHIT. These foreign-loyal TERRORISTS operating IN AMERICA must be stopped by our elected leaders. Or WE’LL stop them for you.✌️🇺🇸🫡 https://t.co/BpK8ilK4c7

Saved - March 11, 2025 at 6:17 PM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

REMINDER: Goldman Sachs funded fake “pro-Hamas” protests on college campuses, then Mossad, Israeli Ministry of Strategic Affairs and Israel on Campus Coalition spied on American students and threatened to ruin their futures if they had insufficiently pro-Israel responses. War.🫡 https://t.co/LAD7aX1YrG

Saved - March 11, 2025 at 8:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Hey Chris, maybe think twice before threatening the only Senator not influenced by Israel. It’s time to step outside of DC and face reality. Also, just a heads up, I’m talking about a future Senator here.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Hey, here’s an idea, Chris. How’s about you don’t ever fucking threaten the only Senator left in Congress who isn’t on Israel’s payroll. Or we’ll discuss this horseshit with you in person. I’d suggest you peek your head outside of DC sometime and realize what time it is, retard. https://t.co/Lnif57tgqp

@ChrisLaCivita - Chris LaCivita

Tick tock Tommie

@RepThomasMassie - Thomas Massie

I’m not voting for the Continuing Resolution budget (cut-copy-paste omnibus) this week. Why would I vote to continue the waste fraud and abuse DOGE has found? We were told the CR in December would get us to March when we would fight. Here we are in March, punting again! WTFO

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

*Representative (FUTURE Senator)

Saved - March 11, 2025 at 7:48 AM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

This is so fucking embarrassing. At least pretend to be a journalist, Kyle. For fuck’s sake. Wait a second… oh.🤦🏻‍♂️ https://t.co/3PgTSpCwZi

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Chaya Raichik’s family runs the LA Chabad Lubavitch synagogue, PayPal (and Gmail) sprang from Chabad Network in Rehovot, IL and Elon ALWAYS responds when she complains about anything. So don’t discount a possible (likely) internal attack here by ISRG and the Let’s Encrypt eMafia. https://t.co/sYY7mZs1I0

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

There it is. Now we can completely disregard “Dark Storm Team” as the true culprit. (We’ll run a few Maltegos & TraceRoutes later to determine who’s REALLY behind the DDOS.) https://t.co/oJk7OB5K5j

Saved - March 11, 2025 at 7:30 AM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

The current administration has one week from today to address shit that benefits AMERICANS and ONLY Americans. Then, we start doxxing everyone in it and families. And no, I don’t mean “Jews living in America”. I mean “Americans who are American ONLY.” Enough Israel horseshit.✌️

Saved - March 11, 2025 at 3:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m really uneasy about foreign agency terrorists and weapons dealers on Green Cards at our universities, spying on American students for Israel. We should definitely talk about this in person, especially since Shai has a nice place.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Gosh, I gotta tell ya, @DakotaSidwell. I’m not real comfortable with foreign agency terrorists & weapons dealers being here on Green Cards, working at our universities & spying on American college kids for Israel. We should discuss this with Shai in person. He has a NICE place.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

“I’m the GOOD guy here on a Green Card.” -Shai Davidai, JFNA (Mossad) https://t.co/5k3YMlh5vh

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

By “discuss this”, of course I mean THIS.👇 https://t.co/nhtjEEKi67

Saved - March 10, 2025 at 10:29 PM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

PRO TIP: For the best counterattack against this DDOS of TwitterX, there should be massive DDOS attacks against AIG, Fedweb, Akamai, Lightspeed, McKinsey & Co. and Semperis. You’re welcome, America.🇺🇸🫡

Saved - March 10, 2025 at 9:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Chaya Raichik highlights connections between her family’s synagogue and tech giants, suggesting potential internal threats related to a DDOS attack. She dismisses the “Dark Storm Team” as culprits. In another post, she expresses strong disdain for Arvind, accusing him of complicity in political upheaval since 2020. She further criticizes several major companies and individuals, linking them to perceived injustices surrounding 9/11 and alleging a broader conspiracy involving Jewish influence in tech and finance.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Chaya Raichik’s family runs the LA Chabad Lubavitch synagogue, PayPal (and Gmail) sprang from Chabad Network in Rehovot, IL and Elon ALWAYS responds when she complains about anything. So don’t discount a possible (likely) internal attack here by ISRG and the Let’s Encrypt eMafia. https://t.co/sYY7mZs1I0

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

There it is. Now we can completely disregard “Dark Storm Team” as the true culprit. (We’ll run a few Maltegos & TraceRoutes later to determine who’s REALLY behind the DDOS.)

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

A hacking group known as "Dark Storm Team" claimed on Telegram that they were responsible for taking X offline several times today.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

In case you’re wondering, Arvind would GLADLY fucking help them with this, considering he’s been complicit in Bolshevik Revolution 2 every step of the way. In fact, that’s why he was put in his current position in April of 2020, just after lockdowns began. Fuck. Him. https://t.co/ufd92T9l2F

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Btw, fuck IBM (9/11), fuck Cognizant (9/11), fuck Google (9/11), fuck Akamai (9/11), fuck MIT, fuck Kleiner Perkins and fuck Sayeret Matkal. Fuck EVERY Jew-controlled, IQT/public-funded BigTech/PE/AI/BioTech company defrauding our H1B so Israel can avoid accountability for 9/11. https://t.co/yevWW66zPj

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

IBM, Akamai, Northrop Grumman, AMD, MIT Marianne Brown Bill Ellmore JD Sherman Daniel Lewin CAMBRIDGE, MA *Lewin attended Technion — Israel Institute of Technology, where Li Ka Shing donated $130,000,000 before COVID to build Guandong Technion — Israel Institute of Technology. https://t.co/H3jFtXqJle

Saved - March 10, 2025 at 8:36 PM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

You’re working for Columbia and UJA/JFNA/Mossad while here on a GREEN CARD? Hoo boy. That’ll be a good one to commit to memory. Thanks, Shai. Please continue posting.

@ShaiDavidai - Shai Davidai

Like Mahmoud Khalil, I too am on a green card. Unlike Khalil, I don’t support U.S.-designated terrorist organizations, take over university buildings, and call for the genocide of anyone. He wasn’t arrested for speaking up. He was arrested for breaking the conditions of his stay here.

Saved - March 10, 2025 at 7:59 PM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

There it is. Now we can completely disregard “Dark Storm Team” as the true culprit. (We’ll run a few Maltegos & TraceRoutes later to determine who’s REALLY behind the DDOS.)

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

A hacking group known as "Dark Storm Team" claimed on Telegram that they were responsible for taking X offline several times today. https://t.co/vB1eIhClx7

Saved - March 10, 2025 at 6:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it interesting that Ken Paxton is involved in a legal battle with 404 Media over a subpoena related to a Google privacy violation database. It raises questions, especially considering my previous exposure of USAID's funding of an NGO linked to Jill Biden, which was under investigation for serious allegations. Meanwhile, a troubling headline has emerged about a Texas AG investigation into a Google-backed AI startup accused of inappropriate interactions with minors, highlighting significant concerns about the platform's impact on children.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Funny you should ask about Ken Paxton, because as of December 9, 2024, the 404 Media (VICE Motherboard) people behind DOGE seem to be fighting AG Ken Paxton over a subpoena for disclosures pertaining to a Google internal privacy violation database. Weird.

@KimWexlerMAJD - Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD

Remember that time I exposed how USAID was funding an NGO in Guatemala, Save the Children, that was linked to Jill Biden and that was under investigation for alleged kidnapping and child trafficking? What ever happened to that investigation? @KenPaxtonTX @DOGE @DataRepublican 🤔

@KimWexlerMAJD - Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD

According to usaspending dot gov, Save the Children received more than $28 million in grant funding for their work in Guatemala over the past 5 fiscal years … the funding came from USAID and directly from the U.S. State Department. @robbystarbuck @RepBrianMast

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

“Texas AG Investigating Google-Backed AI Startup http://Character.AI Accused of Inappropriate Interactions With Minors” Oh. What a disastrous fucking headline for Google, DOGE and 404 Media, folks. How about that?

character.ai | Personalized AI for every moment of your day Chat with millions of AI Characters anytime, anywhere. Super-intelligent chat bots that hear you, understand you, and remember you. Free to use with no ads. character.ai

@BackupFTMFW - FTMFW777

Texas Attorney General Investigating Google-Backed AI Startup http://Character.AI Accused of Inappropriate Interactions With Minors "Two Texas families sued the startup and its financial backer Google, alleging that the platform's AI characters sexually and emotionally abused their school-aged children. According to the lawsuit, the chatbots encouraged the children to engage in self-harm and violence." https://www.yahoo.com/news/texas-attorney-general-investigating-google-185837196.html

character.ai | Personalized AI for every moment of your day Chat with millions of AI Characters anytime, anywhere. Super-intelligent chat bots that hear you, understand you, and remember you. Free to use with no ads. character.ai
Texas Attorney General Investigating Google-Backed AI Startup Accused of Inappropriate Interactions With Minors Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has announced that he's launched an investigation into Google-backed AI chatbot startup Character.AI over its privacy and safety practices for minors. The news comes two days after two Texas families sued the startup and its financial backer Google, alleging that the platform's AI characters sexually and emotionally abused their school-aged children. According to the lawsuit, the chatbots encouraged the children to engage in self-harm and violence. Alongside Cha yahoo.com
Saved - March 9, 2025 at 11:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been diving into the connections surrounding Snapchat and its investors, particularly 21st Century Fox and others like TPG Capital and Fortress Investment Management. It’s intriguing how these ties might explain some of Snapchat's decisions, especially in light of recent discussions about a US government website having an IP in Singapore. The involvement of various high-profile entities and individuals, including those linked to Kamala Harris and significant financial returns, raises questions about the broader implications of these relationships.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

http://Doge.gov? Singapore? Let’s ask the gang at 404 MEDIA. Aka, VICE Motherboard. JASON KOEBLER SAMANTHA COLE EMANUEL MAIBERG (Columbia | SIPA) JOSEPH COX INVESTORS: 21st Century Fox TPG Capital Fortress Inv Mgmt Soros Fund Mgmt Disney Monroe PARTNERS: Snapchat🤦🏻‍♂️

Work | DOGE: Department of Government Efficiency | DOGE: Department of Government Efficiency Work | DOGE: Department of Government Efficiency. doge.gov

@Irishgypsy288 - Irish Gypsy

Why would a US gov website have an IP in SINGAPORE!? https://t.co/0q8qUDObwj

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Snapchat makes so much sense now.🤦🏻‍♂️🤣 https://t.co/T2N7grPwDt

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Vice Media Investors and Stakes https://t.co/zFlmV1FwPH

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

This is what I mean when I say “Snapchat makes so much sense now.” These criminal Jew fa***ts and their attempted coverups aren’t even fucking clever anymore.🤣🤦🏻‍♂️

@fijcberg8200 - Juan FiJCzelberg

Speaking of unfalsifiable claims, weren’t you the Director of Software Engineering at Snap since 2018, aka: KKR (Kravis/Bilderberg/Partnership for NYC) Ares (Apollo Global Mgmt/Epstein/UJA/Mossad) Sesame (UJA/Zients/Donilon/Hakluyt/JCF/Paulson Inst/Goldman Sachs/Atl’c Council) https://t.co/yr0gqk2T2r

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

@BasedTorba @ChristianMaess1 @Kronykal Your claim is inherently unfalsifiable as it is all opinion. The reality is that the vast majority of political power holders are not Jewish. The overrepresentation in liberal arts is easily explained by the fact that other high-IQ demographics prioritize STEM fields over…

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Ah, yes. Snapchat, 21st Century Fox endorsed Kamala Harris lol. And there’s Andreessen Horowitz Partner and the AI guru of the DJT2 Administration, Sriram Krishnan. PS: I’d almost forgotten that LIGHTSPEED was the EARLIEST investor in SNAPCHAT too. What’re the fucking chances?!

@fijcberg8200 - Juan FiJCzelberg

*SRIRAM KRISHNAN led Snap’s product team! Small world! And 21st Century Fox, Snap and Ripple (XRP) endorsed KAMALA lmao. *Lightspeed put $8.1 million into Snap and turned it into $2 BILLION in <5 years. Lucky bet, huh. Congrats to LIEW and his MCKINSEY & CO. homies in SINGAPORE. https://t.co/oEs7b0zS13

Saved - March 9, 2025 at 7:56 PM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Brodsky, eh? That’s committed to memory for the future.

@JasonMBrodsky - Jason Brodsky

It raises questions if Qatar is paying Tucker.

@MarinaMedvin - Marina Medvin 🇺🇸

Um… guys… this is getting scary…

Saved - March 9, 2025 at 6:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Hi, everyone! I hope you're doing well. I came across some information suggesting that Halliburton has control over Rafael and the Iron Dome, and I jokingly mentioned it could be hacked. Someone asked how they could help and if I had a contact in Egypt for sharing intel. I want to clarify that I'm not advocating for any actions, but if something were to happen, it could potentially combat trafficking. I listed some influential entities like the Wallenbergs, Atlantic Council, and others involved in various sectors.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

@MfaEgypt @EgyptEmbassyUSA Hi, gang! Hope all’s well. So anyways, if you REALLY wanna destroy Global Jewry terror in the ME (and worldwide), a little birdie told me Halliburton controls Rafael & the Iron Dome. Be a shame if it got hacked. Oops, accidentally posted the network.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Holy shit, really?! How can we help? Do you have a contact in Egypt we can link up with to pass along intel they might find useful?

@DougAMacgregor - Douglas Macgregor

There are indications the Egyptians are preparing to invade Israel. Should this happen, they will target the Israeli defense systems, offensive weapons and rapidly move around the southern area of Gaza and head towards Tel Aviv. We must work immediately to end this conflict.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

I’m not ADVOCATING for shit to go down, but… if it DOES, you’d be doing the world a huge service & fighting trafficking. EQT: Wallenbergs, Atlantic Council, Larry Summers, CrowdStrike, McKinsey & Co., Aspen Institute, Goldman Sachs, Santander. Saudi Aramco: Johns Hopkins/DARPA https://t.co/HdXnsklLcY

Saved - March 9, 2025 at 6:07 PM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Gosh, Con Inc’s inflooencooor Jews really are committed to making it seem like Mossad Tate is official spokesman of TheNoticing™️. Don’t worry, he isn’t. We’re MUCH angrier and far more committed to getting justice than Tate. And we don’t traffic children with/for you fa***ts.

@Shawn_Farash - Shawn Farash

Zero pushback from @hodgetwins after Tate blatantly lied to their faces. There are many victims, including one who is a Florida Resident hence the investigation.

@TheMilkBarTV - Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

Andrew Tate LIES to the @hodgetwins "there are no victims." -There's currently 49 victims in Andrew Tate's various cases. - 11 victims have given statements against the Tate brothers in their two Romanian cases and are classified as injured parties (An injured party is a victim…

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's incredible how some people either don't think or just want to hate me. Usually, when a famous person faces these accusations, many victims appear. Name anyone, and you'll find hundreds of victims, new lawsuits, and countless stories. But here I am, three and a half years into this, with the most media spin ever, and not a single girl has come forward. Every girl they contact says I'm nice. They like me, even defend me. No one's against me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But it's kind of incredible. I don't know if the people who hate me are stupid or if they just wanna hate me and not use their brain. Right. But when a famous person is attacked with these kind of accusations Mhmm. Loads of victims come forward. Name anyone. Hundreds of victims, new lawsuit, victims, victims. I'm three and a half years in with the most media spin of any case ever Mhmm. Without a single girl coming forward. Every girl they get ahold of is like, nah, he's nice. I like him. Yeah. I like Andrew. I defended you, baby. Can I see you? Yeah. But but no one's against me.
Saved - March 9, 2025 at 5:38 PM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Holy shit, really?! How can we help? Do you have a contact in Egypt we can link up with to pass along intel they might find useful?

@DougAMacgregor - Douglas Macgregor

There are indications the Egyptians are preparing to invade Israel. Should this happen, they will target the Israeli defense systems, offensive weapons and rapidly move around the southern area of Gaza and head towards Tel Aviv. We must work immediately to end this conflict.

Saved - March 9, 2025 at 5:08 PM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

PRO TIP: Jews trying the whole “it’s the brown people in the Middle East” shtick again, after you spent the past 6 years putting America through literal hell, is only going to expedite the Noticing™️ and your imminent expulsion from America. You have no future here. Get a clue.

@sourpatchlyds - Sour Patch Lyds

Qatar owns Tucker's ass.

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

There’s enormous pressure on the United States to participate in a brand new war against Iran. The government of Qatar thinks that’s unwise, so of course they’re being slandered relentlessly in American media. Qatar’s prime minister, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, explains.…

Video Transcript AI Summary
As the Prime Minister of Qatar, I believe the World Cup was used to attack our societal values and impose foreign ones, which we resisted. We respect visitors who respect our laws, expecting the same in return. The attacks on Qatar stem from an agenda to normalize unacceptable values and a disbelief that a small Arab country could host such a tournament, which smacks of racism. We were even asked by a UN commission to build nursing homes to improve our human rights score, despite it going against our family values. Qatar aims to do what’s right for our people, region, and friends, focusing on peace despite facing criticism and demonization from those undermining our efforts. The Hamas office in Qatar exists at the request of the US to facilitate peace, and has brokered numerous deals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thanks for joining us, mister prime minister. Speaker 1: Thank you very much. Speaker 0: So you had the World Cup a few years ago here. It was very widely covered around the world, and part of the coverage, maybe the majority of the coverage was not about soccer football. It was about your country and how it was, you know, needed to come into line with the social mores of the West, etcetera. There was a lot of lecturing about, to your country about the way that you live. Did you feel that? Speaker 1: Well, it's unfortunate, you know, there are the whole purpose of hosting the World Cup is to bring the world together in that country to put the country in the spotlight about the football, about the tournament, and about people coming together. Unfortunately, countries and some NGOs try to use this as an opportunity to attack on values of the society itself, on the values of the country, of the community by using it as an opportunity to change these values and to impose their own values on our country and our people. That's something wasn't, was expected from our side that we will be attacked, we will be hearing a lot of lectures about values and things that are not belongs to us. And basically our decision from the beginning that we don't need to change the country for one month's settlement. And, I cannot change the value of a whole society and impose on them values that I don't believe in. And, it's against every principle in our society, against the principles of Islam, against the principles of Christianity as well. And that's basically, we said very clear. We respect everybody who's coming here as long as they are respecting the laws in that country. As you are expecting from the Qataris when they visit any of your countries in Europe, to respect your laws. And basically, that's what we want from the people. Anything happen in their personal life, it's their personal life. But nothing should happen in public against the laws of the state of Qatar, and we will never change. The problem that those countries and NGOs put a lot of efforts in demonizing this World Cup in order to impose their values. Yet, there were many things happening around the world and they are just turning blind eye. If they put some efforts and energy on those real issues that affecting the human lives around the world, it would be much better than the waste investment that was in campaigns against the country to change its values, to impose new values which are not even, you know, related to us. Speaker 0: So why do you think that is? This used to be called cultural imperialism. Yeah. You know, taking your values and using force to impose them on another society. But this is probably the richest country per capita in the world. It's free. Qataris can come and go. They don't have to live here. They choose to live here. And your values are thousands of years old. Why would it be important for an NGO? I thought they were supposed to be feeding people but instead they're yelling at you for not having enough transgender Qataris, like what is the point of that? What do you think that actually is? What are Speaker 1: they trying to do? Well, think it's mainly driven by an agenda that these are the things that we would like to see in countries that they are not accepting it, you know, and societies that they are not accepting it. We need to make it normal for them. We need to normalize it. Second, a lot didn't accept the fact that Qatar is a small Arab country, can host a world class tournament. Basically, they were like, you know, how a lot of attacks that why Qatar won the World Cup, like they don't have even the culture of the World Cup. I don't know what's, you know, what does it mean if if I am a country like a marginal country, I don't have the right to host a world tournament. And this is more about, honestly, I see it like more racism and superiority and that's basically, I think, the main driver for this. Speaker 0: Susan, an official here told me a funny story and I want to check to see if it's true. This person told me that some bureau or commission in the United Nations was raiding the human rights here in Qatar and said in order to score higher, you have to build nursing homes Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: For your old people to live. And this person tried to explain, you know, we don't have nursing homes because old people, parents live with their children. But you built them anyway in order to get a higher score on this and they remained empty. Is that true? Speaker 1: Well, it is true actually. They are like, you know, sometimes when you have international organizations trying to impose certain conditions in order to give you like the better status that will make you look good, it requires from you some steps that you will do that. It's not even required, needed here in this kind of society. Look, Qatar is a very small country. The people here, family matters for us. Parents matters for us. We are in debt to our parents until the last day in their life or in our lives, whatever comes first. If someone will leave his parents alone without taking care of it, he will be publicly shamed by the society. It's not really an acceptable custom or habit in this country to have your elder, to have your parents staying in a senior home. He's the one, the parents are the ones who took care of us when we were children, until we grew up to become independent, and we should, we have the duty to take care of them. And that's really the genuine nature of the Qatari society, so that's why you end up with something that you don't need. It's not according to your value, it's not according to your religion, But we build it anyway to get the fancy It Speaker 0: does, if you take three steps back, it's like they're mad at you because you don't have enough transgenders, they're mad at you because you don't put your parents in some institution. Maybe they're trying to break up your families. Speaker 1: Well, can be a reason. Honestly, I don't know what is really the purpose behind this, but we see that, you know, a lot of things that are happening are attacks on humanity in general. It's when you lose the family value, when you lose the connection between the family themselves, you will lose the connection between the people as well on a broader level, on the people in the same neighborhood, on the people in the same region, in the same countries. And that basically will just make us, you know, as individuals who are quote unquote independent from anyone. That's what we will feel. Yet, it will just make our societies vulnerable and easy to be penetrated. That's right. That's I think the main issue that we are facing and the main threat that we are facing. You have seen, Tucker, you you spent now a few days in Qatar and you have seen you came to my home and you have seen that my home is surrounded by my family homes. And it's not I'm not really living in isolation from them. I'm not. The nuclear family, the bigger family, and it's like it's all one community, family and basically you can apply this and magnify it to the entire country. This is not the case for Mohammed, this is the case for everyone here. People even when they move temporarily to another neighborhood or to another place ten minutes away from their family, they feel homesick. So it's it's we believe that this supposed to be the case for all the countries where families, families bonds matters. Families bonds really create from you, from your society a strong society. That's not easily penetrated. And that's what creates the national unity as well in face of external threats and everything. Speaker 0: So that's kind of the key is that when you are cut off, when you're alone, you are powerless and you can be controlled. Yeah. You can be penetrated. Speaker 1: You can be penetrated. Yes. Very true. Speaker 0: Your country has been in the American media sporadically recently and it's under attack for reasons I don't fully understand. One the reasons I wanted to come here was to understand why people are mad at you. And I think you've got the biggest overseas US air base right near here. So you're clearly a US ally. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: But I keep reading reference to Qatar as anti American or pro Islamist or a threat to The United States somehow. Where do those attacks come from, do you think? Speaker 1: Look, we, as a country, we always want to do the right things. And basically, the right things not for only for our people, but for our people, for our region, and for our friends. And when you are trying to do the right things, sometimes you change your mind, you know, when you hear this kind of criticism. But it wasn't really in our culture because we believe that it serves the real cause behind all these efforts is to bring peace. Peace for the people, peace for the region, and peace for our friends. And basically, the peace is like is the main foundation for us, for our people to prosper. Peace has a lot of enemies. A lot of enemies who wants to undermine it for political reason, who wants to undermine it for economical reason, who wants to demonize your effort in order to make sure that every step you will take will be suspicious in order to control also the parties that you are helping in that. And basically, they don't know by doing such a thing they are not harming us, but they are harming the region, and they are harming our friends including The United States. And having an ally like and partner and friend like Qatar with the airbase as one example and working together very closely on a lot of issues, a lot of files helping bringing Americans homes from different countries, whether it was in the evacuation in Afghanistan, whether it's in American hostages all around the world, mediating in different conflicts. They basically, if they, you know, keep criticizing Qatar and attacking Qatar, they think that this is just harming Qatar and Qatar reputation. It's not. It's actually because we always like, you know, we go back to the results. We focus on the outcome and we think about that that should be our objective and we should focus there and we shouldn't really disturb ourself with any noise. But they don't know that this is harming The US and The US interests at the end of the day. Speaker 0: So my sense is that part of the criticism and the confusion from Americans, well, I think two causes. One, you have a Hamas office here. And Hamas has been designated, I think, repeatedly by the US government, certainly by the Congress, as a terror organization, and people say, well, could you have a Hamas office here? What is that? Speaker 1: We have to go back to the root of this office. Like, why it's here in the first place? And Hamas office, when it was opened here in the first place, it was opened with full transparency and full consultation and actually even request from The US. Speaker 0: The US asked you to put a Hamas office here? Speaker 1: They are actually. They have asked us to open the channels with them and to have an established communication channel with the same case what was applied to the Taliban as well. And look, at the end of the day, if you have a presence of someone in your country and you are engaging and talking, it doesn't mean that you are endorsing his ideas. It doesn't mean that you are supporting him. We are, the purpose of this office was to facilitate peace, to stabilize the region, and to make sure that always it's serving the purpose. And you can go through even everything that, all the events that happened in the recent ten years since the office was officially opened here in Doha. How many peace deals have been brokered from that office through that channel? Many of them. 02/2014 was the discussion and the negotiations was initiated here and ended in Egypt. In 02/2018, '2 thousand '20 and '20 '1 with all those escalations and many of escalations that we avoided to prevent a war. There are many, plenty of them. You will lose count. Then after October 7, the first hostage deal released the hostages, the women and children, was 109 and the foreigners. It was 109 hostages. November 23 happened through that office. The second hostage deal which we are going through right now, it was produced out of this office. So the office is a communication channel and it doesn't make me, you know, feeling shy that I speak with someone whom I have a disagreement with. President Trump spoke with North Korea. He didn't shy out. He met with him. He engaged with him. He wants to put an end for the conflict. He wants to make a deal with him. He's a dealmaker and this country basically is brokering deals. Speaker 0: Initially at the request of the US government? Speaker 1: Yes. And it continued like everything that we did looked at her. What I'm confident that throughout the years that I've been working under the leadership of the Emir, we are sure that every step we are taking we are very transparent, coordinating with The US and making sure that we are doing the right thing. So I have nothing wrong that I did that I am shying away from. I know that we have a lot of attacks and unfortunately we have attacks from The US legislation like from the Congress many times that although we did it at the request of the government, yet the Emir always tell me that if we are able to save a single life it's worth everything. And I'll tell you something, we've been under a significant attack in the last fifteen months during this war in Gaza. Unbelievable. No one would handle such an attack. And we worked tirelessly on achieving this deal. And the moment we went out to announce that deal being achieved and we see the celebration in the streets whether it's in Gaza or in Israel. That moment makes us forget everything. Speaker 0: You've been attacked with the US Congress. The core question for me is if Qatarsi is an enemy of The United States, why is our air base here? Have there been calls to remove the air base? Speaker 1: Well, there are like some voices who unfortunately very much misinformed that this is very critical for The US security to be here in this region. And, you know, actually the base itself when it's moved in the first place was moved after September 11. Yes. To Doha. And it was a very risky decision for any country to take it, and we took it. We took it because of the friendship that we have with The US, because of the partnership that we are committing ourselves together with The US. And it turned out to be like the most important US base outside The United States. And basically it served the security of The United States, but also it served the stability of this region. Speaker 0: If you're like us, you're probably a little tired of companies that claim to care about your privacy and then whip around without your knowledge and sell your data to the highest bidder. They do it all the time. They make a fortune off your private information. Everything about you, everything you do online can be sold and it is. But there's one way to stop it. It's called ExpressVPN. ExpressVPN is an app that sends a % of your online traffic through secure encrypted servers. Privacy is the point of the product. If you don't have it, everything you do online can be tracked and recorded by data brokers and then sold to pretty much anyone, including foreign governments. That seems like a total violation of your rights, but unfortunately, it's legal. ExpressVPN prevents it. It prevents data hawks from compiling your personal information. It blocks them from invasively profiting off what you do online. So if you're new to using a VPN, rest easy. It's super easy. You just plug it in and it works. With ExpressVPN, their identity defender scours the sites of data brokers and requests that your information be removed. Right now, you can get an extra four months of ExpressVPN for free. Just scan the QR code on the screen or go to expressvpn.com/tucker. So the president's envoy in this region and to Ukraine and globally at this point is Steve Whitkoff, his friend. And Whitkoff, who I think has done a good for the record, think has done a good job, but was attacked in some US media for his connect he had done business in your country, and he was attacked as a tool of your government. Speaker 1: Well, you know, sometimes when you read the reports about Qatar, Qatar like you feel that this is a superpower that controls, you know, everyone and everyone is a tool in the hand of Qatar. Like, this is all a joke. Steve is respected businessman. He has done business. We didn't do anything wrong with him. We have done business. I I've known him for a long time. I attended his son wedding. I have a personal relationship, and all this happened before even the election, know, before the election taking place. This was, I think, last February, just months before the election. And this friendship and relationship, it means that there is a trust between two people. And this trust will of course matters for, you know, the working relationship that we have and partnership that The US and Qatar has. And it benefited the deal at the end of the day. The man traveled all the way. He stayed here. He spent a few days in Doha. He participated with us in the negotiation. He pushed when it was required. He did a great job. We, as partners, we achieved the deal at the end of the day. The deal wouldn't be achieved without with Qatar single handedly or with The United States single handedly. It means all of us, all of us are one team and work together now. People are attacking him for his relation with Qatar and being a tool in Qatar. If you go back and trace back, those people who are not interested in having a deal, not interested in having they put their political interests ahead of the interests of even the hostages themselves. How many family in Israel celebrated the return of their loved ones? I'm not going to talk about Chazza. There's hundreds of thousands of people. They've been fed after a very long war. But just, you know, if you look at this and look at the ones who attacked someone like Steve Whitco, who achieved and succeeded in reaching this deal because of his relation with Qatar, is to make sure that the next time he calculates his steps. But Steve is a great man, straight shooter. It doesn't matter for him as it doesn't matter for us. We are friends, yes. This is something I feel proud of. I have many friends in The United States and those friends might become, you know, in certain positions whether in this administration or in the future administration. Doesn't mean that, you know, those friends will be like a tool in our hand or in other hand. And basically, the people who are using this, they just, you know, the problem that they cannot take it that a small country can get the results. They always have to think about an external factor that bringing them these results. And when they look at it as a small country and with this amount of resources, the first thing that will come to their mind, oh, they are bribing everyone. I'm a country like any other country. I'm operating like any other country. I protect my people's interests. I protect my region's interests. I protect my friends. And that's what will always continue the same way. Speaker 0: So Trump gets elected in November, inaugurated in January, and immediately there's a cease fire. Almost immediately with Steve Whitcomb leading the negotiations with your help. But that's coming after years of bloodshed utterly destabilizing this part of the world, the world itself. Where was the Biden administration during all of that? Speaker 1: Look, Takar, what's really making me feel sad that the agreement that we have achieved on January 15 is almost 95% the one the framework that's been agreed in December and the agreement that's been agreed in March 24. And it took all these months in order to, put it in motion. With the previous administration, we were working very closely. The director of CIA is someone that I worked with, I respect a lot. And we did, you know, a lot of work together. The partnership was honestly, you know, an exemplary. But at the end of the day, I think it's the calculations of of one party over the other That why would I do it now? Let me wait. And then president Trump, of course, they know there is no, like, there is no deal happening before the inauguration as he announced. It might have a consequence, and I believe that was that played a big role in this. Speaker 0: But the fact is they couldn't get a deal done and he did. Speaker 1: I think this is look, also the way that Steve has managed to represent President Trump was also a very effective way. Speaker 0: One of the criticisms of your country is that you're too close to Iran. I should say you're very physically close to Iran. Speaker 1: Yeah, are physically close How close? It's around 120 miles away. Speaker 0: Right across the water? Speaker 1: Yeah. It's just, you know, you can have a boat ride and ninety minutes you are there. Speaker 0: So what is how would you describe your relationship with Iran and why do you think you're being Speaker 1: criticized for Look, it's you know, Iran has has a lot of problems in the West. We understand that. We acknowledge that. They have problems with the region, with countries in the region. Yes. At the end of the day, Iran is, you know, our next door neighbor. And we have to have to maintain a good relation with all our neighbors. We have a lot of things in common when it comes to the gas field, the largest gas field in the world. It's partnership between us and Iran. It's half two third of it in the Qatari territory and one third is in the Iranian territory. Speaker 0: This is in the Gulf, this is undersea? Speaker 1: Yeah. This is the one in the Gulf Sea. You have I have to coordinate on environmental issues, like, for example, the water contaminations. I have to coordinate on security issues, like smuggling. I have to have this relationship, this working relationship with Iran. But also when you think about it from a bigger perspective, it's for the interest of the region to have a better relation for everyone in the region with Iran. And you have seen that there is a huge progress in the relationship Iran and the GCC between Iran and the GCC in the last few years. And basically, even the disagreement that we had in certain policies, for example, we worked against each other in Syria for fourteen years. Speaker 0: Against Iran? Against Iran, yeah. Speaker 1: Right, which was Speaker 0: backing Hezbollah Speaker 1: in the And the same thing in Lebanon, and those differences are put aside when it comes to the bilateral. We made the bilateral as a relationship of necessity that we need to have this engagement together all the time. Those disagreements, we talk about them, we try to understand each other concern, and we try to find a common ground. And basically that's what we expect from other countries to do when they have, when they are, you know, around neighbors that some others has disagreements with. You need to engage. Now, this is criticized in The US that we are close to Iran. In terms of what? In terms of policies that has controversies with the The US, it's not true. Our policies has been very clear. Our policy is based on principles. Our policy has zero enemies. We have to have friends with everyone. We would like to see peace in our region, we would like to see peace around the world. If there are, if we see innocent people under attack, whatever their backgrounds, we will always help them and we'll support them. These are the things that our power policy stands standing for. So if they see me that you know this is like putting me on a club on the other. They are watching me from thousands miles away. They don't know what's happening in this region. They have no knowledge about it. This relationship, it's an important relationship, not for me, for the entire GCC and for the entire GCC stability. Look Tucker, I think that there is a misunderstanding. Or let's say maybe it's more about a legacy issue. That The US needs to take care of the whole world problem. This shouldn't be the case. Each region needs to address their own problems. Needs to make sure that this region is stable. The US is the friend and the ally of and partner of all the GCC countries. So The US expects from us to come to them with vision that this is the way we would like to see the region and that's the way we are going to work on the region. And we would like to have also your support in that direction. That's I believe how the relationship should work between us and The US. Not I'm waiting for The US, what's the problem between them and Iran and then I base my dealing with Iran based on what The US want. The US is waiting to listen to me what I need from Iran because I am the friend of The US and Iran is my next door neighbor. And basically I think this misunderstanding or let's say the legacy issue, that's what's driving this whole narrative floating here and there. I think that you know, one day everything will be resolved diplomatically. If I take a stand against my neighbor because of an external issue, very strong stand, what I'm going to do if those two adversities come together. Speaker 0: So I think it's the policy of your government that you oppose Iran getting nuclear weapons. Certainly your neighbors Speaker 1: Yeah. Course. Speaker 0: Are on the record against it. How close do you think Iran is to getting a nuclear weapon? To building one? Speaker 1: Well, look, actually, a nuclear weapon is bad for the region, for any country, whether it's Iran or any other country. But also, like, when it comes to, you know, developing a nuclear program, there are concerns, of course, whenever any nuclear program is developed around your region. And those concerns can be not only military concerns, but also security and safety concerns. As I mentioned to you, if the water is contaminated, the nuclear facilities of Iran are on the other side of the coast. It's closer to Doha than Tehran itself. So the risks and the threats is affecting me, my country, affecting other countries in the GCC more even. Speaker 0: So, there's a nuclear site directly across from you? Speaker 1: Yeah. And that's basically, you know, that's why it's putting the entire region in a lot of risk if there is no clear standards for managing those nuclear facilities. And those clear standards ensuring that this is a nuclear power plant that will be used for peaceful use. Now, who's right and who's wrong? This is not for me to judge. Yet, what we would like to see, we would like to see a nuclear program that have complying with the international standard. We are speaking with the Iranians all the time that we need to work together, need to work with the IAEA in order to ensure that those standards are followed. There are a lot of news and headlines we see that Iran is close to a nuclear weapon. This is nothing we have ever heard, we have ever seen, I mean, or experienced. Even our engagement with the leaders there, or even with the supreme leader, he said very clearly that he has issued a fatwa or a declaration that Iran will never go for nuclear bomb. And basically, this has also its moral status within the country. So, I hope that we can reach to a solution, a diplomatic solution where, you know, there is prosperity for the region, sanctions are lifted, nuclear program is peaceful and assurances for the entire region. And this is will be, I think, a booster for the region development and prosperity. Speaker 0: So there's a great deal of pressure in Washington on the White House and on the Congress to participate in or sign off on an attack, an aerial bombardment of the Iran nuclear sites. However many there actually are, one of which, as you said, is directly across from you, so you think about this a lot. What would be the consequences if that happens? And that's not theoretical, as you know, that could happen soon. What would happen next? Speaker 1: Well, think it will just will be a start of a war that will spread all over the region. And basically do we expect from any country to get attacked and to stay silent? There will be a reaction. Those reactions and retaliations, where it's going to be? Are they going to reach thousands of miles away? They are going to be in the region. And basically every country in the region are concerned from such a step because it will affect our security, number one. But also for a country like The US, it will affect their security as well. They have a big stake in that region. Whether it's on military bases, whether it's on energy facilities in that region, economic interest, forget about everything, educational facilities. Mhmm. So all those, you know, interests will be affected if something, God forbid, drops in that region. Look, we there is no way that Qatar would, you know, support any kind of military step in that region. And we will not give up until we see a diplomatic solution between The US and Iran. This needs to reach to an agreement. Speaker 0: May may I ask, just going back a second, you've said that there's the Iranian nuclear facility directly across the water from you. If that were blown up and nuclear material wound up in the water since it's right on the water, what would happen to the water? Speaker 1: This will be basically entirely contaminated. We have run this exercise of risk in the country. A few years ago before we bought, before we built our reservoirs, we had the water that we use for our people is from desalination. And we don't have rivers, we don't have water reserves, and basically the country would run out of water in three days. The whole country? The whole country. Now, after the reservoirs we increase that capacity and we are keep increasing it. But, this is not only applied for Qatar. This is applied for Qatar, this is applied for Kuwait, this is applied for UAE. It's all of us in that part. Speaker 0: So if that nuclear site gets blown up and nuclear material winds up in the water, none of those countries have water? Speaker 1: No water, no fish, no nothing. Like, it has no life. Speaker 0: Oh, so that would be a history changing environmental catastrophe. Speaker 1: It an environmental catastrophe. That's why I'm, you know, that's why I'm telling you that's the position of Qatar in the map and the region with Iran. A lot of people they don't even understand it. I remember one, once I went to know visit the US Congress and I was meeting with one US Senator and we were talking and discussing about Tijuana and He said basically, you don't have don't have to deal with them. And I drew for him a map on his desk. For the first time he realized that this is these two countries are that close to each other. So there are a lot who doesn't see this region as close, you know, to Iran and like it's too intertwined. Speaker 0: So they don't have maps in the senate? Speaker 1: No, they do have maps, but probably they don't know what's what other. We are very small. Speaker 0: Do you think, I mean, to extent you can say I should say you're the prime minister, but you're also the foreign minister so you this is what you do all day every day. But to the extent you can say, do you think that the Iranian government is willing to de escalate through negotiation, open up its nuclear sites to international inspection of some kind, reassure the world they're not two weeks away from getting a bomb as we read practically every day on the internet, whether it's true or not. I mean, do you think that's achievable? Speaker 1: Well, think it is achievable and actually all the engagement that we had with Iranian officials, as as I mentioned to you, we were just there a few days ago actually and engaging with the president, engaging with the supreme leader, the foreign minister over there in order to find a diplomatic solution. And basically, are willing to engage, they are willing to get to a level that creates comforts for everybody. And most importantly, are focused on mending their relationship with the region and that's something in itself. It can create a lot of progress in every front with their own. So, believe there is an opportunity. Now, come back to the question the chicken and the egg which come first. I believe we should forget about these questions and you know get the parties together. Start to understand each other's concerns. And basically if everything is complying with the international standards, I don't see any reason why we don't have a deal. Speaker 0: Sleep is essential. All mammals do it, but only people have trouble doing it. At night, wanna get into bed, feel great, and pass out. But how do you do that without drugs? Well, Cozy Earth is one way. Cozy Earth makes an amazing bamboo sheet set that sounds weird, but is awesome. Next level soft. They're temperature regulating. Now let you stay cool and comfortable all night long, it really helps your sleep. Cozy Earth makes them. They also make bath sheets, the perfect addition to your shower routine. Huge, super absorbent, stunningly soft. You'll never wanna go back once you go the full, enormous, soft bath towel route. Cozy Earth is all about turning your house into a sanctuary where you can unwind, recharge, sleep. They make it risk free with a hundred night sleep trial and a ten year warranty. Really? Yep. A hundred nights, ten years. Go to CozyEarth.com/Tucker. Use the code Tucker for up to 40% off. That would include sheets, towels, pajamas, and more. CozyEarth.com/Tucker, and you get a post purchase survey. I'll probably send it to you. Tell them you heard about it here. That's good for everybody. We hope you enjoy it. There's talk in The United States of increasing sanctions on Iran. I didn't know it was possible, but Iran has been under some form of sanctions for almost fifty years. Forty six years, I think. Have they achieved their intended goal? And bigger picture, have you ever seen sanctions against anybody achieve their intended goal? Speaker 1: Look, this issue is very controversial. First, as a principle for for my country, for state of Qatar, we see unilateral sanctions are unaffected. And it's punishment of punishing the people, not punishing a country or a regime. That's number Speaker 0: one. They still have the revolutionary government from 1979 in Speaker 1: power, Yeah. I mean, if this is if it has if it would lead to a result, we wouldn't be in in that situation until now. Speaker 0: But El Castro died in Havana Speaker 1: Yeah. After fifty Speaker 0: years of US sanctions. Speaker 1: So so just, you know, going back sanctions, what does it create? Pressures the people, starves them, creates black markets, it creates a whole illegal system. It's if the sanctions are coming out of The US, it actually prevents all The US interest or companies to have business and lose the opportunities for other countries. So I don't see a world where the sanctions work. Honestly, for us, as I told you, it's a core principle in our foreign policy. We refuse we don't don't support sanctions at all. Sanctioning countries, I'm talking about. And sanctioning countries is just making the situation much worse. Well, can I just ask Speaker 0: you, so three of the biggest oil producing countries in the world Venezuela, Russia, Iran Yes? Have been under, I mean, the most extensive sanctions in history. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: They're still selling oil though. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: Like a lot of oil. Speaker 1: Yeah. Much yeah. I think I think it's mainly it's sold in different means, in different currencies. And look, Tucker, I I recall when the Russian sanction came out at the beginning beginning of the war on between Russia and Ukraine. I had an interview in one of The US meditations and I said very clearly that sanctions will only create a parallel marketplace for other currencies. So the dollar dominated international currency, you will start to see people moving, countries moving away from that. Yes. By the time. So it won't benefit. It won't benefit, it won't get you what you want. It's the contrary. That's basically what's been, you know, at the end like any country like Venezuela for example or Iran, they need to survive. They need to feed their people. They need to get, you know, at least the basic requirements that they want. They will find ways to sell their oils. They will find ways to use other currencies. They will find markets who will accept them. And, you know, selling them and buying from them. And that's basically you created like a parallel market. And that's that's what I've been saying. That's Speaker 0: So you cut out US countries, you weaken the US dollar, you make the country more repressive inevitably, but you don't dislodge the leadership whether it's Putin, Chavez Maduro, the ayatollahs in Iran, Fidel Castro, and you don't prevent them from selling their oil in international markets. So why exactly would you levy sanctions? Speaker 1: Honestly, from at least, you know, my my humble experience looking at all those sanctioned countries, in the last, let's say, you know, I always like to talk about my tenure in diplomacy which is ten years. In the last ten years I've seen a lot of sanctions floating around on a lot of countries. None of these sanctions has achieved the results that's intended for. Speaker 0: Well, mean I think that's true. It's not an ideological point I think. Yeah. That's like factually true, right? Speaker 1: It is factually true, yeah. Speaker 0: So why does the Why do we keep doing it? Speaker 1: Just, you know, if you go and name a single country that has a regime change. Yes. Or an entire, like, behavior change to the good because of sanction, you will not find any. Speaker 0: Okay. So again, I I don't think what you're saying should be controversial because it's provable. Yeah. Go to Wikipedia. Yeah. So why I mean, just I think this morning I was reading, we're gonna sanction this person more. There's got to be some reason that the US Congress and various administrations have continued to want to do this even though there's absolute proof that it doesn't work. What would be the reason to do it? Speaker 1: Well look, as I told you, you know, when you know some, I don't know honestly, we can ask this question more for US, you know, legislator and policy makers, but I think from my perspective this is when you have like, if you don't talk to the other party, if you don't want to use military, which is something that we never advise for, the only tool will be will remain in your hand is sanction to show power and to show leverage, which some people they think that this is leverage and power, which is not. Speaker 0: Well, it doesn't seem to be. Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: I Power's measurable. Right? Speaker 1: Actually, as you know just you know, if you go through every, like, every sanctioned countries, it never achieved the objective. That's what I want to see. Speaker 0: Yeah. I I think that's Uh-huh. It's true. How does the Ukraine war end, do you think? Speaker 1: Well, look, you know, there is lesson that history taught us. That there is no war started with one of the parties wants the war. Always two parties they don't want the war and they end up in a war. And there is no war ended without a negotiation around the negotiation table to find a peaceful solution. How despite how long it took. So this war will end at the end of the day around the negotiations. Now, if you look at the recent efforts that President Trump is is doing and together with the Kingdom Of Saudi, I believe this is the right direction, the right path forward. Because you know, we were like when the war started as a state of Qatar, we always like you know express our willingness to help to support if there is any chance for mediation. Looked at it, it's something far away, it's in Europe. Yet we have some experience in mediation which is a track record that we have built throughout the year. And we saw that this conflict is too complicated, we tried to break it down to smaller mediation efforts and we were working on the children file, for example, Russian and Ukrainian children bringing them back to their families. We were working on the energy file but unfortunately didn't work out. In order to build a foundation for you know someone like President Trump to come and to broker a peace deal. I believe it is the moment. I believe that the steps that's being taken are the right steps. And basically, the way it ends, it should be the way that it addresses both countries' concerns. I think that the Ukrainians has legitimate concerns that they need to address, and the Russians has legitimate concerns that the Ukrainians needs to address. And I believe this will never reach a solution unless there is some, you know, direct talks between them. And also some demonstration of support from the partners of both Ukraine and Russia that they need to put an end for this and they need to understand each other concern and they need to take them in consideration. And the partners role is to give them the assurances and the comfort that those considerations will be taken seriously. Speaker 0: I hate to say it, but I think Russia's partners are probably willing to express support for a settlement. I don't know if Ukraine's are, and that would be Europe, Great Britain, and Western Europe. And I mean, you just saw the prime minister of Britain say the other day, we're gonna send British troops to Ukraine. Speaker 1: Well, it's, you know, at the end of the day, as I told you, it's it's an issue between Russia and Ukraine, and they need to they need to address it themselves. They need to get the assurances that, you know, both countries need. I think that within, even within the EU, everyone is sharing the same opinion, I believe, but at the end of the day they will come will come down to a conclusion that this issue needs to be settled peacefully and this issue needs to take into consideration everyone's concern. Speaker 0: You participated in a successful ceasefire between Israel and Gaza, and who knows if that lasts. I mean, I don't Speaker 1: know when this Speaker 0: is gonna air, I don't even want to speculate. But clearly, it's been awful for everybody. Certainly been awful for Gaza, it's been awful for its neighbors. I think it's been really bad for Israel. I mean, it's just kinda hard to see an upside. So how would you, if you were in charge, fix this, you know, eighty year old conflict for good? Speaker 1: It's going back to the basics, you know. If you look at the history since Madrid declaration in the nineties, where Israel needed to be integrated in the region, economic normalisation should happen between the countries in the region, and a political horizon for the Palestinians to establish their own state on the borders of 1967, which is according to the Security Council resolutions. Since that time, until today, we didn't see anything but the situation is going backward. More settlements, more violence, more, you know, policies which are destructive for the Palestinians, unfortunately. And basically, are expecting from the Palestinians, you know, just to obey, to stay quiet, and not, you know, there will not never be any anything instigated. This is normal, you know, when you have, you know, a situation that's lasting that long. To have this kind of turbulence all the time. And I'm not talking here about seventh of October, I'm talking about the entire period. How many wars we had. We had a lot of them. A lot of people, we hear them saying that we need to try something new. We need to try things that we are not even, you know, thinking about. Yes, we agree. The two state solution. We've been talking about we never tried this. Have we ever tried this and didn't work? Does this country that's established next to Israel will be a threat for Israel? It's a threat as long as it's not a country. And we said that we are willing to provide security guarantees for Israel. We all of us, we will be integrated together as one region and demilitarize Palestinian state even. So, it's not even like, you know, a fully independent Speaker 0: Not even a real country. Yeah. It's demilitarized. Speaker 1: So, it's basically like everything you are offering and in exchange we all we were always like, you know, either because of their political situation in Israel, like, we were always faced by rejections. There were just few leaders in Israel who had the courage to come out and to say that this is this is the only solution. This is the only way forward. But in the last few years, we we didn't see any of them. Speaker 0: Do you think Donald Trump can force the Palestinian state? Speaker 1: I think, you know, look, President Trump, he's he's a great dealmaker. He's a great businessman. He's very successful. He made brokered many deals around the world during the first administration, and I believe if we will have peace one day, this is the best opportunity for us with someone like President Trump. Speaker 0: Are you is Qatar at net zero? I know there was some enthusiasm about making sure you got to net zero. Speaker 1: Well, if you see, you know, the largest exporter of LNG and net zero, I think there is something happening wrong. Speaker 0: Does that mean you're dead if you're dead to zero? Speaker 1: We are committed, first of all, that, you know Speaker 0: Wait, aren't you supposed to pretend you're getting to net zero? Speaker 1: Look, I'm not, you know, going to pretend anything that I'm not going to do, but the gas has proven that it is the most important reliable baseload source of energy for the next century maybe. So, and the gas is much cleaner than a lot of other energy resources. Benefiting the environment, benefiting a lot of countries switching from coal to gas, and that's what we are producing, that's what we are focusing on. Now, countries who were just, you know, rushing to get to net zero and trying to impose some, you know, green policies that are not realistic, they are attracting from those policies now. Yeah. You see them like, you know, some of them they are going back to court. Speaker 0: Well, they're also on the verge of revolution in some cases because they destroyed the lives of their people. Speaker 1: Yeah. So, it's basically also, it's not fair when you try to impose, you know, these kind of regulations in countries that they have their resources not being developed, not being exploited, and they have no electricity even. Like Africa, for example. And you want to make sure that now everything there is green, is to reach net zero, and you are not allowed to come and to exploit your energy. But they don't have electricity. So the whole concept I think it's right now there is a lot of debate, there is a lot of, you know, argument about it and I'm not sure if the world will be able to achieve it. Look, we understand the danger of the climate, We understand the danger of the climate change, but it doesn't mean that we shoot ourselves in the foot. We need to think about it wisely. We need to think about it gradually. And look, Tucker, once the maybe I told you in a separate meeting that, you know, the pyramid of of the needs of the people, First, security, then food and water, then health, energy, education, education, strong economy, and then climate change and the environment. So we are living in a region that barely handling the three layers of foundation. And people like coming and you know trying to impose on us the tip of that. We need to make sure that our neighbors, our surrounding are secured. We need to ensure that they are fed. We need to ensure that they have enough health care. We need to ensure that they have a good education. We need to make sure that they have energy, access to energy in the first place. Speaker 0: Time for their true life Alp story. I got a call from a friend of mine yesterday, honestly, true story, who said his girlfriend had just broken up with him over Alp. He wouldn't stop. And I thought to myself, that's kinda sad. He said, no. It's not sad. Imagine if I'd married her. Now I know I was saved. Then the next day, this same friend is driving at twice the speed limit through a major American city pulled over by a cop in a speed trap. Cop takes his license registration, goes back to patrol car, runs him, comes back, looks in the window, and sees a tin of Alp on the dashboard, pauses, stunned, says to my friend, you use Alp? Yeah. I do, says my friend. So do I, says the cop. We all do. He looks at my friend thoughtfully and goes, drive safely, sir, and hands back his license registration. No ticket. So in two days, he's saved from a tragic marriage to a girl who doesn't like Alp and a speeding ticket. All true. It's more than a nicotine marriage. In a nation of 350,000,000 people, we're guessing there are about 350,000,000 Alp stories. Email us yours. We wanna know and read it on the air. Email tellall@AlpPouch.com. Tell all @AlpPouch.com. Give us your Alp story. It does seem like things have changed just in the past six months, partly because of the electricity needs of AI, of EVs, all the stuff baked in the cake. The clear limits of renewables, like they can't actually run a modern society, that's all obvious now, and so a lot of investment funds and politicians have sort of pulled back from the net zero theology. But what's amazing to me is that it seems like some of them really believed it. I mean, the case of Qatar, you're opening up a new gas field and I think some, like even energy people laughed at you and said that there's kind of no future for gas. Yeah. Speaker 1: Well, look Speaker 0: Why did they say that? Speaker 1: This actually happened to us twice. Once when we started the gas exploitation, it wasn't yet the future of the energy. At that time, this was back in the early nineties. And we took the risk. Qatar was in totally different economic situation at that time. We took a great risk. We put a lot of pressure on the country and the needs of the country. And apparently, the LNG picked up and became one of the main sources. Then, at the peak of the net zero and the green agenda, we announced the expansion of our production which was back in 2018. And we decided to go on to invest. And at that time, you can read reports from the IMF for example that a lot of countries will end up with a lot of oil and gas but with no money because they will have no countries to sell their gas to or they will have no markets to sell their oil to. And this was just in 2018 and like everyone was panicked. In the same year, we have announced that we are going to expand our gas field production and we are hoping to double it by 02/1930. So, from 77,000,000 cubic ton, which was peaked in 2011 and continued being sustained until today, by 02/1930 we will reach 144. And that's basically will be the biggest. Speaker 0: So, was a projection in 2018 that no one would want to buy your natural After Speaker 1: 02/1950. Speaker 0: Who made that? I mean, that's like Speaker 1: That's IMF report actually. It's not projection for Qatar, it was for the entire GCC. Speaker 0: Basically That's so far out of whack with observable reality. Like, that's insane, Speaker 1: It's not, it wasn't, I mean, like, we had the debate about this within our government at that time and we didn't believe it. We have seen that the requirement for the energy will just increase. We were watching the revolution in a lot of technologies and we have seen that whether it's the green hydrogen, the blue hydrogen, the renewables, all of them they can never be cost effective in the next ten, fifteen years and maybe more. And they will not be enough. The base load you will always need an energy mix and the base load of this mix will be the energy which will remain always the gas. Speaker 0: So that was obvious to just interested non experts like me or just people who read about it like on the side. But the IMF researchers and energy analysts who came up with this projection, do you think they really believed it? Speaker 1: Well, don't know honestly. Mean, we were like at the beginning when we have seen these reports we were just questioning why they are doing that. But it was like part of the global sustainability agenda and probably this is an idea that all international organizations agreed to promote. Basically, it's the same thing like, you know, when it comes to those organizations you always see a common agenda item that everyone is advocating to, told the same direction. Speaker 0: Look. They're lying to you in order to keep you from Speaker 1: We have nothing against, you know, the green and the climate change. It's something that all of us we need for our survival, for our planet, yes. But also we need to be realistic in our approach. We need to make sure that this progress is not harming us, it's benefiting us. It's not because we want to make sure that the planet lasts forever, that our people doesn't last forever. I mean, it's it's basically, it's really a miscalculation. Now, another example I will I want to give you, like for example in our partnership with The US in the gas area. We have during you know the time before like the fracking and shell gas in The US, we were supplying The US with LNG at certain point of time and we built this what's so called the Golden Pass in Texas in order to be a receiving terminal for the gas. During President Trump time in the first administration we signed with him, we signed during his administration to make it as a sending terminal. All the gas, The US gas will be exported through that terminal, which is a partnership between Qatar Energy and ExxonMobil. Speaker 0: So to explain, you take natural gas out of the ground, it's often found with oil, but then you have to basically freeze it and make it convert it to a liquid state in order to ship it across the ocean. Yes. So LNG is liquefied Speaker 1: natural gas, that's what you're talking Liquefied natural gas, yes. And then you have also beside that during the same meeting when during the previous administration with President Trump, the first one, we have signed the largest single largest petrochemical plant in the world. It's called the Golden Triangle, which hopefully will be online very soon. And that's what will provide the basic feedstock for all the industries in The United States, which is the polymers. And this is also a partnership between Qatar Energy and Speaker 0: US I mean looking back, think we can be a little bit more critical in trying to understand what the green agenda was or net zero was. But no one ever explained without natural gas, how are you gonna get fertilizer and plastic? Did anyone ever explain that to you? Speaker 1: No. They have no answers. Even I mean, look, even people with the like who are adopting the green agenda, when they are talking about electricity, for example, generating electricity from green energy, green resources, those electricity will need batteries. Batteries will need lithiums or the EVs. Yeah. This lithium, when you mine those lithium, what is the effect on the environment? Oh, I know. And, if you calculate it, it's much worse for the planet and for the land than the oil and the gas combined. And maybe from the coal as well. So it wasn't really well thought of. It was something that I believe was you know taken to a direction doesn't serve the interest of the entire world. Speaker 0: Does it make you nervous that the smartest most powerful people in the world could jump to conclusions they didn't think through without evidence? That they could just say something was true without knowing it was true and thinking through the consequences? I mean, it seems like a kind of mass insanity that took over the world. It Speaker 1: keeps us up all night. Speaker 0: Me too. Mister Premonster, thank you very much. Speaker 1: Thank you very much, I appreciate it. Thank you.
Saved - March 9, 2025 at 4:32 PM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Get. The. FUCK. Off. My. Feed. LUX CAPITAL. JOSH: Tell your UJA/Mossad/UBS/Envestnet/Impactive.io wife, Lauren Taylor Wolfe, I said both of you Mossad ops can get yourselves COMPLETELY fucked. You elections-stealing, financial markets defrauding, Israeli bioterrorist fa***ts. https://t.co/sKjUvEk5D7

@wolfejosh - Josh Wolfe

What is happening in Syria is pure GENOCIDE Intentional targeting killing of people based on ethnicity/race/belief. What happened in Gaza was routing out terrorists—to recover hostages—intentionally hiding under civilians + hoping to maximize deaths to weaponize public opinion If you can’t tell the difference watch the videos. If you can and still call it genocide you are tribal bigot and hateful antisemite

Saved - March 9, 2025 at 4:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I express distrust in @DOGE's ability to unravel the Arabella Advisors situation, given its connections to early FTX investors and other controversial figures. I believe that entities like Palantir and those associated with Jules Kroll should not be involved, as they prioritize Israel's interests, which I see as intertwined with Arabella Advisors. I acknowledge that you may not engage with these thoughts, and that's okay; I recognize the dynamics at play.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Sam Bankman-Fried (Joseph Bankman) and Marc Elias (Chris Elias) 💥NOTE: I do not trust @DOGE to objectively unwind the Arabella Advisors racket, considering most people involved with DOGE are tied to Global Jewry PE/VC firms who are EARLY FTX investors and COVID bioterrorists. https://t.co/1Df3xXXrBW

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Who are the individuals behind this?

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

Arabella Advisors manages six nonprofits that serve as incubators and accelerators for a range of other left-of-center nonprofits: the New Venture Fund, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, the Hopewell Fund, the Windward Fund, the North Fund, and the Impetus Fund. They use these companies…

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Arabella network influences elections in many ways. Demand Justice, a C4 organization, helped pick Biden's judges, including Katanji Brown Jackson, and former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki came from there. Its sister organization, Fix the Court, attacks the Supreme Court. Arabella is also a major abortion funder, largely through Warren Buffett's money. In 2020, one of Arabella's biggest charities gave $25 million to the main charity that received $350 million of "Zuck bucks." That charity continues to infiltrate local election offices. Arabella operates through groups like the Institute for Responsive Public Government and the Center for Secure and Modern Elections—classic DC groups with names that are hard to argue against.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Helping to shape the elections, shape the vote. Speaker 1: Sure. The rule of thumb for all questions about the Arabella network is the answer to any question, everything. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: Which is just now, I'll I'll rattle a few off. So, demand justice by the way. Demand justice has helped to pick Biden's judges including Katanji Brown Jackson. It not only had somebody inside the White House Counsel office, it also, you know who came from Demand Justice? You may have heard of her name, Jen Psaki. Of course, she's now influencing the election pretending to be a journalist, sort of. Why? And there's another way they're trying to influence things, right? The left is desperately trying to influence the Supreme Court. And I told you you have those matching pairs of C4 and C3 nonprofits. Well, Demand Justice was a C4. It's c three sister was something called fix the court, which is pounding every day, attacking the Supreme Court, smearing Clarence Thomas and others, getting taken seriously by The New York Times and Senator Sheldon White House and whatnot. That's yet another. Abortion, they're one of the biggest abortion funders in the election. Obviously, abortion is gonna be a big factor this year, and most that's mostly, by the way, Warren Buffett's money. Tens of millions of dollars every year running through Arabella. And the yet another thing they're doing is they were mixed up in Zuckbuck's in 2020. And nobody knew this, including us, until a year after the election, even though we were ground zero for reporting on what was going on with ZuckBucks. But a year after the election, when Arabella's nonprofits finally had to file their IRS disclosures, what do we discover But the main c three charity that got around 350,000,000 of Zucks bucks also got 25,000,000 from Arabella's biggest Right. Charity. And they haven't stopped there. That charity is still going strong, trying to infiltrate local government election offices and manipulate them. And Arabella has two different groups, Institute for Responsive Public Government and, Center for Secure and Modern Elections. Right. Speaker 0: It's Speaker 1: classic DC, you know, BS. Who's against secure and modern elections? Who's against responsive Right. Government. Right? Speaker 0: Hi. Right. Who's against transparency? Who's who's who's against democracy? Right. Look. What are the different ways what are the different ways in which the opposition is the opposition aware of what's going on? What what another way to ask that is what's the response

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

*NOTE: Neither Palantir nor anything Jules Kroll has touched (Kroll, K2, Marsh McLennan, etc.) should be anywhere NEAR the ARABELLA ADVISORS racket. Because they’ll just protect ISRAEL’S best interests, and Arabella Advisors is the epitome of “ISRAEL INTERESTS”. https://t.co/rqHyvUBffX

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

PS: Don’t worry, I don’t expect you to engage or consider any of these posts either. No hard feelings. I understand the game.

Saved - March 9, 2025 at 4:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights about key figures in the tech and defense sectors, highlighting Matt Grimm and Ravi Mhatre's backgrounds and connections. I noted Mhatre's controversial involvement in various projects and investments, including Guardant Health and Snorkel AI, and mentioned his ties to significant funding sources. I also pointed out a substantial investment Anduril received shortly before the COVID pandemic, suggesting potential implications for data sharing and health initiatives. The posts reflect a critical perspective on these individuals and their affiliations.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

MATT GRIMM: Anduril, Co-Founder & COO. *Mithril Capital Mgmt *Palantir *Booz Allen Hamilton *Defense Intelligence Agency *U.S. Navy *DARPA ✅RAVI MHATRE *Anduril, Partner & Co-Founder *Lightspeed *Booz Allen Hamilton &: K2 Intelligence (K2 Integrity/Kroll) OpenAI (Bilderberg) https://t.co/NhfKmwsjEW

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

RAVI MHATRE refresh: *He’s one of the fucking ISRAELI TERRORISTS behind Lahaina, LA fires, the ongoing 9/11 coverup and genomic-based bioweapons. *Currently funded by OUR TAXES, thanks to JEW TRAITORS at KLEINER PERKINS who infiltrated Silicon Valley & our CIA/IQT/NSA/CISA/DHS. https://t.co/gAm8xN6b5W

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

RAVI MHATRE Other founding investments: *GUARDANT HEALTH (Chris Schaepe) *SNORKEL AI (Greylock; IQT/CIA *TALON (IDF Unit 8200; Mike Rogers) 💥NOTE: Schaepe “stepped away” from Lightspeed for his criminal involvement in the COLLEGE ADMISSIONS BRIBERY scandal. (Kleiner Perkins) https://t.co/UDmuXZCE3J

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

SEPT 2019: Nice little $120,000,000 investment Anduril got from Founders Fund, Andreessen Horowitz & General Catalyst, one month before COVID. I bet that data sharing and those Palantir hospital partnerships made Andreessen Horowitz’s a16z “health” program especially lethal. 😒 https://t.co/CwaHamq14g

Saved - March 9, 2025 at 3:55 AM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

“…with or without the help of the United States, Israel will be just fine.” Glad that’s settled and we can treat them like the hostile enemies of America they are.

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

Spoiler alert I know how this story ends. So nobody should worry about Israel because with or without the help of the United States Israel will be just fine. And all of those wishing the demise of western civilization, I hate to break it to you, but we know how that story ends too.

Saved - March 9, 2025 at 3:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user accused Jews and Israel of being involved in 9/11, claiming others avoid factual discussions to evade losing arguments. Another user responded, stating they were blocked after inquiring about possible financial motivations behind the first user's claims.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

That’s because Jews and Israel actually did 9/11 and you have vested interest in pretending otherwise, traitor. The “it’s beneath me” shtick fools nobody. It’s your way to avoid a factual discussion where you’d get your ass kicked, without looking like you’re avoiding the topic.

@redsteeze - Stephen L. Miller

Well, see Dave, when someone starts at "Jews and Israel did 9/11." Nothing they have to say beyond that is important, smart, engaging, or worth it. I hope this helps clear this up for you.

@ComicDaveSmith - Dave Smith

My post basically said “isn’t it interesting that they smear people but can never actually take on their argument” and this is the idiotic response. It’s like they can’t help themselves and they know this is all they have. Fucking pathetic. https://t.co/zIW7IpxkHg

@andrewmitch84 - Andrew

@fijcowitz8200 This cunt blocked me when I asked him if he's on hasbara money. I got my answer

Saved - March 9, 2025 at 2:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I express my strong disdain for liars and terrorists. I clarify that the story of "dancing Israelis" is a fabrication. The reality is that five Israeli illegal aliens were simply taking photos of the burning skyline, and a misunderstanding led to police involvement. The narrative around "dancing Israelis" emerged later as a falsehood tied to a terrorist's father. I find it interesting that this meme persists in 2025, reflecting a desperate attempt to rewrite history.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

God, I hate liars. And terrorists. https://t.co/sSx2jlx4Wt

@MaxNordau - Max 📟

There were no dancing Israelis. Period. They did not exist. It was made up. The video in question does not mention dancing Israelis. There were five Israeli illegal aliens in a truck, who saw the burning Manhattan skyline, pulled over, and took photos. A paranoid woman looked out her window, saw them, diagnosed that they looked excessively happy, and called the police. Then, months later, the father of one of the hijackers made up a story about dancing Israelis. Why? Because he was lying on behalf of his terrorist son. The World Trade Center fell because a group of Arab terrorists hijacked planes and flew them into buildings. Interesting fact: Those Israeli illegal aliens comprised five of the 762 illegal alien arrests made after 9/11. People were understandably paranoid, and law enforcement was acting quickly. Everybody knows why “Dancing Israelis” is a meme in 2025, and it’s not because people care about justice for 9/11.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

But I am enjoying seeing them desperate enough to attempt a rewrite at history once again. Bold strategy, Cotton.🤣 https://t.co/XowDktqXNj

Saved - March 8, 2025 at 9:14 PM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Notice™️ how they never specify which things are inaccurate and why, with receipts? Seriously can’t believe we’ve fallen for their lying bullshit for thousands of years.🤦🏻‍♂️🤣

@HanShawnity - Han Shawnity 🇺🇸

Unlike most other Jew haters on this platform, Ian Carroll is not retarded. He seems smart, articulate, and is incredibly effective at message delivery. In other words, he's a great and talented propagandist. I just can't understand for the life of me why someone with his talent would go down the road of spreading lunatic conspiracy theories that he himself doesn't believe in. Is the money that good? He showed up out of nowhere, got promoted by the usual suspects, and is now on Joe Rogan spreading ridiculous, mostly Jew-hate fueled, conspiracy theories. Are we allowed to ask what his deal is? Did anyone look into his background? Does he have covert ties to hostile foreign actors we should know about?

Saved - March 8, 2025 at 4:02 PM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Rescind this anti-White targeting or you will be doxxed tomorrow. As will your UJA paymasters. Fair warning, Ritchie.✌️

@RepRitchie - Rep. Ritchie Torres

Today, I wrote to @SecDef calling for @DepPressSecDOD to be removed from her position. Given the minefield of antisemitic rhetoric, white nationalist conspiracies, and pro-Kremlin propaganda that Wilson has proudly spread, her continued presence at the Pentagon is a stain on its reputation.

Saved - March 8, 2025 at 1:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I addressed Chuck about his criticism of young non-Jewish White women for sharing facts. I pointed out an email address linked to his wife, who has held significant positions in NYC. I noted the familiarity of the name "Ehud," especially in relation to someone who was Commissioner during 9/11. I hinted at a connection to Ehud Barak, suggesting he might find the information relevant. My tone remained confrontational, expressing strong feelings towards Chuck and his partner.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Yo, Chuck! Since you attack young non-Jew White women for stating facts evil Jews hate, let’s discuss an email address your “wife”, Vice Chancellor at CUNY, COO of NYPL & Commissioner of NYC Dept of Transportation (2000-2007), uses: ehudf@netvision.net.il Who’s Ehud in Israel? https://t.co/Tf9Rgm1YS8

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

You’re definitely getting doxxed tomorrow.

@SenSchumer - Chuck Schumer

As antisemitism continues to surge around the world since October 7th: The Trump administration hired a top Pentagon official with a history of antisemitic conspiracy theories and extremism. It’s outrageous, and Secretary Hegseth must fire her now. https://www.npr.org/2025/03/06/nx-s1-5319995/kingsley-wilson-antisemitic-comments-defense-department-pentagon

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Gosh, that name ‘Ehud’ sounds so familiar, especially for someone who was the Commissioner of the NYC Department of Transportation during the 9/11 attacks.🤔 Do we know any important Israelis by that name? https://t.co/E2CRZLHyMm

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Funny you should mention that. I’m guessing you’ll be interested in the 2nd post above.

@Irishgypsy288 - Irish Gypsy

@fijcowitz8200 Wait.....the only Ehud I know of is Ehud Barak....👀

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

You and your manwife, “Iris”, can both get COMPLETELY fucked, Chuck. Fucking terrorists. ✌️🇺🇸🫡 https://t.co/LJEGbM6tnu

Saved - March 8, 2025 at 11:09 AM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Daniel Goldman was involved with the 10/7 massacre of innocent Israelis, along with his buddy, Cory Booker. He is a threat to our national security and is now discriminating against and targeting young non-Jew White women out of fear of his own future prosecution.

@danielsgoldman - Daniel Goldman

To stomp out antisemitism, we must do it on the extreme left & right. No one who compares Hamas’ infanticide to abortion, promotes Great Replacement Theory, or celebrates the lynching of Jews should get an important DOD appointment. Kingsley Wilson must be removed immediately.

@J_Insider - Jewish Insider

The Pentagon’s new deputy press secretary is facing backlash over a series of recent social media comments in which she has promoted antisemitic conspiracy theories, opposed U.S. aid to Israel and amplified Kremlin talking points. @matthewkassel reports: https://ji.news/4h9a3gW

Pentagon deputy press secretary Kingsley Wilson is a prolific purveyor of antisemitic conspiracy theories The Trump appointee compared the slaughter of Israeli babies by Hamas to abortion shortly after the Oct. 7, 2023 attacks jewishinsider.com
Saved - March 8, 2025 at 4:26 AM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

RIP Booz Allen Hamilton. I’m going to enjoy having you right beside Palantir on my mantel. You’re welcome, America. Again.🇺🇸🫡

@MorningBrew - Morning Brew ☕️

3/ But no one is more worried than Booz Allen Hamilton. The firm gets 98% of its $11 billion revenue from government contracts and is positioned at the cliff's edge right now. Its stock has already dropped nearly 30% since Trump's election, signaling investor fears. https://t.co/wawG01k9pM

Saved - March 8, 2025 at 4:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I refer to Cuomo as "Apollo Andrew" due to his actions in senior living facilities, allegedly linked to UJA and Mossad. His attorney, Mitra Hormozi, has ties to Apollo Global Management and individuals associated with 9/11 and Epstein. I notice a pattern where certain figures are labeled by their religion only when it serves a narrative, like Epstein and Weinstein. There's a sentiment that anything a Jew says can be used against them, and I question who leads organizations like UJA-Federation, pointing to Marc Rowan.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

We call Cuomo “Apollo Andrew” because he murdered American non-Jew seniors in senior living facilities for UJA (Mossad). All while his attorney, Mitra Hormozi, sat on Apollo Global Management’s payroll with 9/11 co-conspirators (Alvin Krongard) & Epstein associates (Leon Black). https://t.co/Nu5wBZdQZn

@ighaworth - Ian Haworth

They never call Hillary Clinton “Baptist Hillary Clinton.” Or Andrew Cuomo “Catholic Andrew Cuomo.” But Jeffrey Epstein is “Jewish Jeffrey Epstein.” Harvey Weinstein is “Jewish Harvey Weinstein.” “Jewish” is only relevant if you want to tie their crime to their “Jewishness.”

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Anything Jew say can and will be used against Jew. Sorry this is happening to Jew.🇺🇸🫡 https://t.co/krSiGfqPQN

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

PS: Remind me, who’s the Chairman of UJA-Federation again? Ah, that’s right. It’s this guy. Marc Rowan. https://t.co/2bDRgaL3u9

Saved - March 8, 2025 at 3:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that the term "Zionism" is often misinterpreted, and I feel that the actions of Israel contradict its supposed right to exist. I’m starting to think that Israel's existence may no longer be justified, as it operates in a state of lawlessness. I also view it as a parasitic nation, which further complicates the discussion around its legitimacy.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

It literally does NOT mean that, according to Jews and their own actions, regardless of what an innocent dictionary definition you ascribed to it says. That said, I’m warming to the notion that Israel no longer has a right to continue existing either. It’s a state of lawlessness.

@mysteriouskat - 🚨 Katherine Brodsky

Zionism is exclusively the belief that Israel has a right to continue existing. If you're anti-Zionist then you are for the destruction of Israel and thus the elimination of the people currently there, which literally makes you genocidal. Even if you don't realize it.

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

*A parasitic nation of lawlessness, at that.

Saved - March 8, 2025 at 2:07 AM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

The idea that Jews are above scrutiny or reproach, especially by Christians, is literal heresy and anyone who goes to their grave preaching such nonsense will burn in Hell. https://t.co/tvBLf1uVm1

@BasedTorba - Andrew Torba

The Jews cursed themselves when they killed and rejected Jesus Christ “his blood be on us and on our children.”

@VividProwess - Vivid.🇮🇱

🇺🇸 🇮🇱 Mike Huckabee, U.S. Ambassador to Israel: "I can't be Christian and not be completely connected to the Jewish people. Our entire faith is built on the foundation of Judaism. God blesses those who bless Jews and curses those who curse Jews." https://t.co/sWKtunZ2Uq

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was once asked why evangelical Christians are so supportive of Jewish people and Israel. The answer is simple: you can be Jewish and have nothing to do with Christians, but I can't be Christian and not have everything to do with the Jewish people. My faith, scriptures, and everything I believe is built on that foundation. We are people of the book. If you read in Genesis that God blesses those who bless Israel and curses those who curse Israel, it becomes very clear.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I had a Jewish friend from New York ask me one time, we were in Israel together. And he said, why is it that evangelical Christians are so supportive of the Jewish people in of Israel? And I said, it's quite frankly pretty easy. I said, you can be Jewish and have nothing whatsoever to do with Christians. But I can't be a Christian and not have everything to do with the Jewish people, the Jewish faith, the scriptures, everything I believe is built on the foundation of that. So for me, and most evangelicals would say the same thing, we are people of the book. It's simple. So if you read in Genesis that God blesses those who bless Israel and curse those who curse Israel, this gets pretty easy.
Saved - March 7, 2025 at 8:26 PM

@fijcowitz8200 - Jahn Fijcowitz

Harping about “Jew hate” while ignoring their blatant ethnocentrism, nepotism, anti-White discrimination, bioterrorism and pedophilia will be the last straw. People are done w/bullshit. The LAST thing they need is your fa***t obtusity acting like it’s their fault for Noticing™️.

View Full Interactive Feed