reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @fionagoddarduk

fionagoddarduk
Posted - October 21, 2025 at 2:22 PM
Saved - October 22, 2025 at 12:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I respond to Jess Phillips, saying she knows I have evidence to prove my claims. Survivors were emailed about broadening the inquiry—from grooming gangs to a wider scope. A meeting refused an investigation, then turned into a regional inquiry, not just Bradford. Jess claimed independence from the Home Office and ignorance of the panel and scope, but I raised my concerns with her. I have some knowledge of it but haven’t read the whole thing. I’m not a reform supporter, which counters that claim.

@fionagoddarduk - Fiona goddard

My response to Jess Phillips, I don’t know why she is saying my claims are untrue when she knows I have the evidence to prove it https://t.co/h43SNSDcHj

@fionagoddarduk - Fiona goddard

https://t.co/ePVo9GzNmO

@fionagoddarduk - Fiona goddard

Survivors were sent emails attempting to expand the scope of the inquiry “should it focus on grooming gangs or take a broader approach” https://t.co/uY6e3M992G

@fionagoddarduk - Fiona goddard

A meeting with a refusal to hold an investigation, which then turned into a ‘regional investigation’ instead of just investigating bradford https://t.co/Vkp1RyYYkE

@fionagoddarduk - Fiona goddard

Jess also claims that the inquiry is independent of the home office, that she had no idea who was on the panel and that she had no knowledge of the scope being expanded. None of this is true, because I raised my concerns personally with her https://t.co/PvaCH1CWx8

@fionagoddarduk - Fiona goddard

@Jhmufc99 I have knowledge of it but havent read the whole thing

@fionagoddarduk - Fiona goddard

@AS7624193449327 Im not a reform supporter lol so that shuts that claim down

View Full Interactive Feed