TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @freedomonfire

Saved - January 6, 2024 at 9:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
On January 6th, there were claims of paid actors, controllers, and fake incidents at the Capitol Building. Questions arise about who was involved and who they were signaling to. Pelosi and McConnell's offices reportedly refused to send National Guard support, raising concerns about their power. The FBI and their alleged involvement in deploying informants dressed as Trump supporters is causing panic on Capitol Hill. There are also allegations of collusion between protesters and Capitol Police. Disturbing footage shows an elderly woman being shoved down the stairs by a Capitol Police officer.

@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire

JANUARY 6TH - Paid actors, controllers, fake tear gas, hundreds of professional photographers, fake blood and more, all at The Capitol Building on that historical day. Is this really what an insurrection looks like? https://t.co/rnzMXiH5WJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Protests outside the Capitol are discussed, with claims of preplanning and paid actors. The video analyzes the events surrounding the Capitol shooting, pointing out various suspicious actions and inconsistencies. It questions the authenticity of the incident, highlighting the use of fake blood and staged scenes. The transcript raises doubts about the credibility of the event and encourages viewers to analyze the situation critically.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are some protests happening down outside the capitol. The Speaker 1: simulated riots in DC was a powder keg long in the making. The evidence for preplanning and setting up a situation for a disaster is overwhelming. Paid actors. Speaker 0: We can take that place. I've got 4 people coming off. Let's get them down here. Speaker 1: I wanna confess that I was paid to pretend to protest today. Controllers. There were guys. They were almost like Speaker 0: monitors. What about Speaker 1: They were, like, prowling them. They were telling them what to do, and they did everything these guys do. Bring Speaker 0: a Hello? Do the job. Get out. Speaker 1: And Hollywood tear gas and In this episode, we're going to analyze the climax of the story and show you how a little Stage direction and fake blood became an instrumental role in furthering the division of the nation. Speaker 2: When he was hiding there, she had No idea that he was even sitting there eating a gun right at her face. Speaker 0: He's not talking anymore. I'm gonna see it. But that's not a woman. They all acting, man. Speaker 1: This is everything wrong with the Capitol shooting. Speaker 0: Convinced that Speaker 1: the New Jersey hurricane's dead from what I saw. Speaker 0: You guys gonna come Speaker 1: in the building? Only on Wooz News. The Homeland Security exercise and evaluation program provides a set of guiding principles for large emergency response drills. In these guidelines, we read about Various roles such as players, controllers, simulators, evaluators, actors, observers. The term participant encompasses many groups of People, not just those playing in the exercise. The head directors of large emergency drills are called exercise controllers. Their job is to keep things running according to the master plan. And here's a cover of the guidelines manual, which spells sheep I mean, Hasseep. Any professional emergency response drill or military drill makes use of fake blood in a variety of forms, Blood capsules, sponges, syringes, and squids. A simple blood squib is a pouch that is designed to break on impact. There are all kinds of squibs using various pumps and tube assembly. Here's the HydraSim trauma bleeding simulation system. It's basically a small pack containing a fake blood supply and a pumping mechanism and some tubes. Some of them are battery operated. Now that we're equipped with the various roles, let's start the analysis. Aki. Outside the As a footnote, I am not affiliated with any gang. And I wasn't paid to make this video, so I'm looking at this completely unbiased. We've also added a time code to Jaden x's footage, which we'll call angle 1, and let's review the scene with minimal volume. You'll notice how much chaos is happening on Screen, yet our eyes are fixed to the woman because that's what we're here to see. No one seems to be concerned with being the next target. It's bang, action. It should be noted that everyone in the room knows what's going to happen. They all play towards the camera. Now let's take a look at some of our characters. Adam Gray, our photographer, Taylor Hanson, Vetter, Rufio, Fredo, Yellow, Data, Jaden, Thomas Berani, ninja slash evaluator, Secret agent man or as I like to call him, Sam, medic slash controller, parrot blocker, shades, red, SWAT 1 and SWAT 2, freaking frack, And our star, Rabbit. We're gonna break this down together, and we're gonna analyze this with 6 different angles and in chronological order. Let's do this. Now this is Medic coming into the room. Notice the enormous earpiece. Speaker 0: Towards the danger. Speaker 1: What's that about? Now look what Red does. He kicks the door. Now we see Red either pick up something or drop something, and it looks like medic does the same. And we know he's the medic because of this patch or sticker. Here we could see Red has 1 glove on, and you can see Jaden in the distance. Now we're all kind of led into this room outside the speakers lobby. We could see Medic has 1 glove on as well. There's Frick. Oh, hey there. And there's our star. They're just waiting around again, And you can see our star looking in the direction of the weapon. She seems amped up or nervous, and you can see we have Taylor Hanson on our left. Notice how yellow hands Rupio the helmet. And notice while he does that, we can see cop 2 and Fredo discussing, almost like they're waiting for something. Okay. Speaker 0: We got Police coming up. Speaker 1: Okay. We got police coming up. Now freaking frack come down. Rufio takes off his hat, Changing his appearance, he receives the signal, and they leave. And it all feels a little rehearsed. Go. Go. Buster. And you can see Adam Gray push his way through. Now this is orange in the front. You should also note that the glass is not glass, but plastic or stage glass, and you'll notice that this barricade was Set up before they entered the room, you could see Buranian red to the left of the screen. In about 30 seconds, they're gonna make their way to the front. Notice how our star keeps looking over to the left as if she's waiting for something. As the officers leave, they're pretending to talk to each other. Speaker 0: And you Speaker 1: can see how easy this plastic comes out. Do you see how easy that is? Frack taps the back of Vedder. Jaden is the first one to give the command that there is a weapon at 34 minutes and 49 seconds. And you can hear others chanting the same thing. Notice that the gunman briefly removes his hand from the weapon like he's communicating, Replying to his earpiece. Look how long it takes him to do it. Notice this person just walking in the background. If we draw a straight line from where the weapon is To where our star is, you will see that they don't match up. The weapon is far below her neck area. Boom. Right there. Now that's 15 seconds since Jaden announced there was a weapon. That's important. Now let's back it up 15 seconds. We could see this guy point to orange. Orange gives a hand movement. And look, the Hollywood glass just falls right out. SWAT one goes to Sam. Now why would Blue ever be in on this conversation? Blue makes his way past yellow where he grabs him, and you can see Berani making a hand movement. And he touches red on the back, and Berani signals her to get into place. And she goes through, and she's ready to fall. And they all scatter. Notice this guy in the background. No one looks in the direction of the gunman. Yellow gets into place. Now that's Rufio. Right when she goes up, he turns his back. It doesn't make sense that Rufio's corralled all these people into breaking down the doors only to step to the side and turn his back. In this angle, Rufio turns to take a peek, and he touches red on the back, And Ninja automatically puts his hands up. Also notice when she falls back, her backpack looks fairly plump, a perfect breakaway for a fall. And you'll see yellow breaks her fall, boom, with his foot. And here you can see the plastic glass. Red gets out of the way. And interestingly enough, Ronnie moves down just to touch her just to touch her right backpack area, just for a brief moment. While Sam comes down, he moves her, what, 9 inches to his left. He's about to reach under her right shoulder. At the same time he does it, SWAT 1 briefly squeezes her right hand. Are you putting something in there? When Sam picks her up, she puts her hands in front of her face. It almost appears that she opens her eyes right there, and she just puts her hands down. Boom. She sat down, then her elbows go down as Data and Orange move into place. Now Sam's gonna make a big hand movement. His left hand is still under her right shoulder. Trying give her a back massage and shit. Who writes this? And look how she's laying. She's still got her right leg up. It's only been 11 seconds since the weapon went off. And here you can see her curl the of her mouth up while a drop of blood runs out from under her nose, which takes less than 16 frames. Here it is in real time. No blood. And there it is. And she has her hands like she's about to give a shadow puppet performance. It's just an interesting face to make. No suffering. It's like, boom, instant death. She's basically using that backpack as a pillow. All the while, look to Sam's right. There's Ninja. And Ninja's been there all along, Speaker 0: And Speaker 1: he comes down with them, and it almost looks like she has a smile on her face. It's almost like a Mona Lisa. And she's holding her right hand clenched like she has something in there. Now you have SWAT 1 coming in Playing a scene blogger. And notice how Rufio is just clamoring over SWAT 3 because there's quite a bit of photographers in that room. Now look, freaking frack. He grabs in the back, and he puts his hands up. See how he just grabs them and and he puts his hands up? They were friends earlier. Remember? And look at Bharani. Okay, guys. I'm just Gonna pull out my phone, and notice how he looks at his hand. He's gonna do that a couple times, and there's a reason for that. So now SWAT one's making his hand movements, you know, the big pointing. And now he's gonna put up his Weapons. And he does this little dance with his knees. Okay. Thank you. Thumbs up. Like, he's pretending to talk to someone, and he's like, thumbs And now Data moves in. He clumsily takes his book bag off. Now here, it gets really strange. With the exception of her nose At this time code, we see there's no blood on Herb. 35/17. We're gonna see her pop in right there. Nothing. 35/21. But wait. Boom. 35/25. Four frames. That's 4 seconds. And now it looks like she's Devoured some small woodland creature. Don't you love how blood defies gravity? But how is that possible? Let's back it up 4 seconds. Now watch. Notice how Sam moves his left hand from her right backpack area, and he goes to grab her hand like she's doing a peace sign with her hand. Dips it in. Look at that movement. Now you can see him move his hand across her face. But look, she moves her wrist into his hand First, it kinda looks like she's smearing blood on her face or putting something in her mouth, but you can see the movement. And he swats her hand down, then he forcefully turns her head To the right, it's hard to see if those are her fingers or if she's holding on to something. Now Sam gets up, and all he's doing is just pointing. Look. Well, I guess my work here is done. They're both Pointing at the same time because it makes for good pictures. You've got the drama. You've got the pointing. And all this blood is just gushing out of her mouth. Don't make no sense. Protestors. Do you hear that? Y'all murdered this person? It's only been 21 seconds since the weapon went off. Grabbing him like, what are we gonna do? And notice he has The full beard. Do people in these positions normally have full beards? Maybe? Okay. He's also double masked. Oh, such a Secret And they just keep pointing. Look. SWAT 1, SWAT, SWAT 2. We can see that yellow has changed its appearance as well. And so Data does these big gestures. She still got her damn hands like she's playing a scarecrow or something. Now this guy coming in, he's a parrot blocker, Speaker 0: and he's Speaker 1: saying move, move. Data just looks up. He's like Medics, capital. All the while, Ninja's still back there, just monitoring everything. Data is just still fumbling through bag not looking for anything in particular. Everybody's just kinda moving around her. Speaker 0: We're an active shooter. Speaker 1: We have an active shooter. How original. Speaker 0: Get her down. Speaker 1: Get her down. She is down, bro. God, it's so cringey. Speaker 0: Here's the light. Flashlight. Flashlight. Speaker 1: So they're screaming for a flashlight, out of all things, a flashlight because the flash Flight will enhance the drama of the photos, and it draws the eye down towards the light Speaker 0: Where's your head? Speaker 1: Where she hit. Yeah. It seems like no one really knows. And that's when she opens her mouth Like, Speaker 0: she's spitting Speaker 1: it out. You could see she has blood on her fingers, but when do we see her ever touch that area? And Data taps her left hand, and she puts down Oh, you'd like to flick something away, fixes something out of her hair. It's unclear if Data is contributing to the blood effects or if he's just a scene blocker. You could see SWAT 1 knees Her right arm closer to her, and then she tucks it under her right butt cheek. So this is the medic. He identifies himself as the medic. Nick, notice that wonderful earpiece he has on? And let's see the various ways he tries to save her. Medic puts his water bottle down. SWAT 1 just grazes her. Everybody's just grazing her. Hair blocker did not been there, and so medic pulls down the flag that's tied around her neck. And notice he only had 1 glove coming into the room, which is very interesting. Look. When he does this move, she opens her mouth briefly or she says something. So he's only using 1 hand, and she just lets some of the blood out of her mouth. Thank god for capsules. And her eyes are she's looking at things, where before, she was just looking straight ahead. At the same time, you could see them just hanging out. And here comes Team blocker cup. Now Ninja's either just making hand movements for the camera or he's giving directions to SWAT 1. And SWAT 1 is just fumbling around with this little napkin, This little toilet in a baggy. Notice how medic tucks this, what looks to be a cell phone, in between Data's knees. It appears data takes the cell phone away with him. Did you see that? What is parrot blocker pulling from her hair? And here he puts it into his pocket. Parrot blocker shouts to Swad that he's a medic, yet does nothing. You can start to see this very small pool of blood, like the size of a cookie, right where Sam's hand was. Speaker 0: Up. We can't save them. Get the Get the fuck up. Get the fuck up. Get the fuck up. Get the fuck up. Thank you. Speaker 1: We gotta get EMS here, guys. Now notice Ninja just randomly puts his hands up. The cops have been next to him this whole Fine. And now he's putting his hands up. It's for the camera. Speaker 0: She's dead. I caught her. Eyes. There are eyes. Speaker 1: Did you hear Jaden? Because he keeps repeating it over and over. He's saying the light faded Her eyes They're all gaslighting because they know the audio is gonna be recorded, so they're all kind of pointing and overacting and fumbling in their little corners. 36 21, Taylor Hanson smiles. Look at shades. Alfredo has no one to talk to. He's got nothing to do right now, and SWAT 1 and SWAT 2 are still Fumbling with this stupid fucking bag. What is that? Little gauze? They're just tugging it along on the flag on the flag kerchief. Everybody's grabbing for her neck. What's that? That's medics hand. Do you hear the scrunch as he squeezes? And the medic comes in. It almost looks like medic hesitates, and then he comes in. Now we see this very small pool of blood. See how there's just a small bloodstain and leaves no trail or indication of a direction. There's no spine, satellite, or elongation tails. There's no cast off. There's no arterial spray or expirated spatter, which makes the use of a blood squib in her backpack and around her neck the most plausible explanation, which could be why during this whole ordeal they never untie the flag. Speaker 0: She's gone, man. Speaker 1: She's gone, man. We're gonna see that, cap, black hat cap. He's still just looking for her pulse, but he just Declared that she wasn't there. And now look. He clearly has blood on his fingers, and he turns his fingers around and looks at them. And he just wipes them on the flag. Look. He just wipes them on the flag, and he moves it out of the way. And that's when SWAT 1 comes in with his little towel that dab, dab, dab, Dab. Dab. Dab. Dab. Dab. Like, this is fucking ASMR or some shit. At the same time, he snaps another photo. Ronnie's faking a call, Oh, look at out his hands. And there's Jaden and ninja just ninjas his way over to us. Scene blocker, cop blocks, parrot blocker. Hey. What's going on? Who's that? Oh, he's got a radio. Maybe he'll call for help. No one's doing anything. Medic stands up. See? He's the medic. With that Sticker. And there's Adam Gray taking all the photos. And it appears the clock reads 2:47. Fredo still has nothing to do. Now look. It's freaking frat. They're still hanging out. Fricks sees the camera and begins acting again. Yep. We're still rolling. Speaker 0: Come in here. What? Speaker 1: You got down to come down. Speaker 0: You got blood on the floor. Speaker 1: Yeah. Not that much. Now that's yellow saying that. Speaker 0: They will not die. Speaker 1: Oh, better. Bless your heart. And now look at Rufio with his hand on top of his head like, oh, it's such a shame. Oh, Ronnie puts his hand around red. There's the famous photo. Speaker 0: There must be an iPhone on the ground. Speaker 1: Has anyone seen an iPhone? Nobody's doing anything. Everybody's just hanging out. Angry lady number 1, She's just there to scream at them. Now notice they're still taking photos of her in the background, yet no one has done anything. Speaker 0: She's dead. Speaker 1: She's dead. She's dead. Hanson in the background. He's got his footage. This is Oh, no. We'll see him later. Ronnie motions to medic, and Alfredo motions for bike Top one. Look. More pointing, more big hand movements. Do you see any blood on Sam right now? He put gloves on He's got little paper towels. Or something. Maybe it's the script. Still just getting all the pictures. Shades is making his big hand movements. Always Grabbing Berani, but notice Berani puts his hand on his back, or he grabs him, and he lets go. Big hand movements. It's jazz fingers. And there goes Adam Gray. What's up, bro? Later gets fake arrested, and then red is pushed out with data. See? They've Bertie made one, and look how uniform they are. Looks like they made it just in time even though they don't go out that way. And there she goes With her book bag and flag still wrapped around Speaker 0: her Speaker 1: Luckily, they don't have that far to go. Just right out that door. Is that normal? Is that normal protocol? You would think if it was as easy as for everybody also get into the capitol, it would be for paramedics. Now we see Sam on the other side of the door, and we see he's littered his latex gloves on the capitol floor next to the blood. No one would ever do that unless it was to add drama to the photos. So that's our pool of blood, that sad, pathetic pool of blood. This is classic. Oh, you just stepped in the crime scene. Guys, you can't make this stuff up. I think he does do it intentionally because it Creates a transfer pattern from the heel of his boot. It adds drama to the photos. He intentionally does that. Is that a cop? Come on, guys. Is that Speaker 0: a cop? Speaker 1: Are these cops? And now they've flipped the black Decap over the blood. They've got the photos. And that's the guy who stepped in it, now changing his appearance. And those are the sad, pathetic droplets from 1 malfunctioned squib. Speaker 0: Now let's take Speaker 1: a look at the aftermath. Oh, no. And so they're all just echoing the same thing over and over again. They're getting everybody to spread the word. Speaker 0: They just killed the girl. He shot a girl right in the goddamn stomach. Speaker 1: I thought it was supposed to be her neck. Speaker 0: He shouldn't kick. He shot a girl in there. They shot a girl. This is Speaker 1: like the cringe hour. Speaker 0: There's not a girl. Speaker 1: But listen to what this lady says. Speaker 0: I didn't see it. Well, that's not a woman. Hey, Moe. That's Speaker 1: amazing. It completely validates everything we're doing here. And notice coming down the stairs like a damn eighties movie, Thomas Berani with his hand up. He's about to stop on the stairs and just start screaming. Speaker 0: Shut it up, Dylan. Speaker 1: And then no one's gonna pay attention. Wow. And now he caught somebody's attention. Speaker 0: Shot it would have gotten through the neck. Come back in the ass. Speaker 1: Bro, Why are you lying? Oh, don't you mean your hand fell back into her book bag? Man, this guy is such a creep. He Speaker 0: does not talk anymore. This is too much. Speaker 1: God. This is so hard to look at. And here he is again. Speaker 3: They shot her in the neck, and she fell back on me and started to say she was fine at school. Speaker 1: What? Guys, you know none of that happened. Speaker 3: And then she started kinda, like, moving weird. Speaker 1: Okay. That's true. Speaker 3: It could've been me, but she went in first. This could be you or your kids. Speaker 1: Jesus. And here, they're whisking her away on a stretcher. Notice these highlighter badges on all of them. Maybe you can tell me what these are, and maybe you can tell me what this black waistband is. Oh, it looks like they did a touch up. He totally has his hand on her boob. And you could see she's clearly still alive. And notice all of these fan shuttles in the background. Brown. Hey. Look. It's Swat 1. What was that about? Even Taylor Hanson got a spot on TV. Speaker 2: And the minute that she hopped up in that pane, she had no idea that he was even there. Speaker 1: No. She only had a 15 second warning. From the first scream to her taking it to the neck. 15 seconds. Speaker 2: She shot her right in the neck. Speaker 1: Oh, now it's her neck. Hopefully, Jaden will get it right. Speaker 2: Yeah. So, basically, all the the protesters kind of Storm to get into the chamber. Speaker 1: And perhaps our last clip is most telling of all. Here's Jaden. Speaker 0: They killed a girl. They killed a girl. My deadass out of there on camera. They shot her. Let me see. I see this shit on camera. Speaker 1: They had Speaker 0: Let me swing. Speaker 1: I guess we're all done. Yeah. So Let Speaker 0: me swing. Speaker 1: I guess we're all done. Yeah. So Speaker 0: See now I got it. So what do Speaker 1: you think, guys? Can you see what I see? Is this shit legit? Maybe I'm missing something. Maybe I'm overlooking it. Please, if you see anything I'm not Sing. Write it below. Please use your word choices carefully when commenting. Hey. Thanks for coming down the rabbit hole with me. Are we being duped? If you learned something, feel free to Scribe. That's why I'm here. It's not just for fun. You know, it takes a lot of work to edit these videos, and I'm just 1 person. I don't have all the answers figured out, but I can tell you Something ain't right. Please feel free to mirror, share, and please keep analyzing. Maybe we could start looking at this stuff a different way. Hey. Thanks for breaking this down with me.

@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire

Who are they? Who are they signaling to? Why don't we have answers? https://t.co/Dp9QQwPlcc

@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire

Why did the offices of Pelosi and McConnell refuse to send in National Guard support? Why do they carry this power in the first place? https://t.co/h24vStjsAK

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Steven Sund Exposes Nancy Pelosi’s Role in the Delayed National Guard Response on January 6 @TuckerCarlson: “So this is an event that Pelosi herself has likened to Pearl Harbor and 9/11 — the worst thing that’s ever happened on American soil. And she’s in charge of allowing the National Guard to come in and respond, but she doesn’t for 71 minutes? What is that?”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Congress passed a law requiring the speaker to request federal resources for events like the Capitol attack. The speaker was denied twice by the House and Senate Sergeant Arms due to optics and lack of intelligence support. The speaker had to go through these individuals to request the National Guard, even during the attack. After 71 minutes and 32 calls, the speaker finally received approval. This delay is surprising considering the severity of the situation, and the speaker was frustrated by the delay.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By federal law, Congress passed a law that requires me to go to the Sergeant Arms Capital Police Board in advance of an event and to request federal resources such as the National Guard. So Congress passed the laws to U. S. Code 1970, look it up, just make sure you look it up before December 22 when they changed it. So what was in effect on 6th, that requires me to go and get approval for bringing in National Guard or federal assistance in advance, have to go to the Capitol Police Board and get approval from congressional leadership in advance, like I did on January 3rd. I'm denied twice because of optics and because but intelligence didn't support it, so think about that. Speaker 1: May I ask you a question? Who made that decision? Who denied you? Speaker 0: I was denied by Paul Irving, House Sergeant Arms, and also Mike Stenger, Senate Sergeant Arms. Speaker 1: And who Speaker 0: do they work for? And who Speaker 1: do they work for? Speaker 0: It would have been working for Pelosi on the House side, that Pelosi was the number one boss, and then, McConnell on the senate side. Speaker 1: So effectively, Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi shut down Your request. Speaker 0: My request was shut down, one, because of optics, which is interesting. You're going to hear that term come up a couple more times, optics over the look of the National Guard on the Hill. But, yeah, in the capital police board, I mean, it it's it's unbelievable that I'm I'm the only chief of police in the United States that has a law preventing me, not just regulations, rules that say I gotta go and need approval to bring in the National Guard, a law. So that's crazy that congress is gonna pass a law that controls what I can do to protect the capital and even in emergency. So think of this, even while we're under attack, I have to go to those same 2 people to request the National Guard to be brought in, I have 3 40 National Guard that have been activated, at least 150 to 180 of those are in the city, many of them within eyesight tied to the capital, okay? We get to come under attack at 12:53. 12:55, I call the Washington DC Police Department, I talked to their assistant chief, Jeff Carroll. Thank god I had talked to him at 10:59 in the morning and asked him if he could possibly put some additional resource on Constitution Avenue, and he had some CDU platoons up there. Called him, said, hey, please send those in right away because we knew as soon as they came to their west front, they start attack, it was going to be bad. 12/58, I make my 1st call to the Sergeant Arms asking, saying, hey, it's bad, we need assistance, I need a declaration of emergency, I need to bring in the military immediately and federal resources. I'm told by Paul Irving, I'm going to run up the chain, I'll get back to Speaker 1: you. The chain is Pelosi. Speaker 0: The chain is his chain would be up to Nancy Pelosi. He didn't have to do that, but he wouldn't give me authorization. The law says in a mercy, he can grant me authorization, but he didn't. He said he run up the chain. My next call was over to Mike Stenger. He is now the Chairman of the Capitol Police Board, told them the same thing, we're getting our asses handed to us on the left front, I need federal resources. He said, what did Paul tell you? He's running up the changes, let's wait to hear what we hear from Paul. Sorry. So for the next 71 minutes, I make 32 calls. I'm in the command center, I'm calling my partner agencies and by law, you know, when first people offer assistance with United States Secret Service, and by law, I shouldn't have requested their assistance. You know, I shouldn't be until I had approval, but I'm looking at my men and women having their asses hand to them and and my first thought was fuck it, I will take whatever discipline there is. Send me whatever you got. No. That's the one tech secret service turned over. You know how they lost all their texts? Yes. It's the text between their, chief chief Sullivan and myself. Thank god for him. Speaker 1: I don't so so you make this call immediately Immediately. To the house sergeant arms who reports Mister Irving, who reports to Nancy Pelosi, he says, I'll call Pelosi. Speaker 0: He says, I'm a run it up the chain. Speaker 1: Run it up the chain, but that is the chain. Speaker 0: Now here's not here's what I got you on this. I wanna tell you exactly what Speaker 1: we do. What happens then? Does he get back to you? Speaker 0: So, over the next 71 minutes, it makes the 32 calls to tie a number of agencies, 11 of those calls are follow-up calls, and look in the. The Senate combined report from 2001, they have a great infographic of the call after call after call after call, 11 times I call in the next several minutes going where are we on the approval, where are we in the approval. Just any minute now, any minute, I'm gonna get any minute finally at 209, 71 minutes later 209, I'm finally given approval think about that, 71 minutes later, I immediately call Mike Stenger, say we've got approval, I was so pissed off, I made sure that this watch commander, I'm in the command center, I yelled to John Wisham, the lieutenant, that's my watch commander, I said, John, mark the time as 2:10, I finally got approval for the National Guard. I was that mad. Speaker 1: So what is the I just wanna pause on this for a minute. That's, like, almost unbelievable. So this is an event that Pelosi herself has likened to Pearl Harbor at 911, you know, the worst thing that's ever happened on American soil. And She's in charge of allowing the National Guard to come in and respond, but she doesn't for 71 minutes. What is that?

@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire

👆 The gentlemen above, FBI? https://t.co/nJeY8dq3Or

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

“Your day is coming, Mr. Wray.” You can sense the PANIC on Capitol Hill as Clay Higgins goes SCORCHED EARTH on the FBI at a hearing. The GOP Rep. presses Wray about reports of 'ghost buses' filled with 'FBI informants dressed as Trump supporters and deployed into our capitol on January 6.' The GOP Chair cuts Higgins off as radical Democrats squirm in their seats. Higgins wants to know the real story behind these 'ghost buses.' So does the rest of America.

Video Transcript AI Summary
During a hearing, a congressman questions the FBI director about the agency's involvement in the events leading up to January 6th. The congressman asks if the FBI had informants dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol on that day, but the director refuses to give a clear answer. The congressman also mentions evidence suggesting FBI informants were present at the Stop the Steal rally. The director denies any FBI involvement in orchestrating violence on January 6th. The congressman then brings up two white buses that arrived at Union Station early on January 6th, suggesting they were filled with FBI informants. The chairman interrupts the questioning, but the congressman insists on the significance of the buses and warns that their day will come.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Director Rick, last year, you might recall a survey I exchanged regarding the FBI's involvement on January 6th and prior. I'm happy to jog your memory to quote, according to the record, I asked you, did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the capital on January 6th prior to the doors being opened. You responded, I quote, again, I have to be very careful of what I say, to which I said, it should be a no. Can you not tell the American people, no, we did not have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the capital on January 6. A year has passed. We sit here again a year later, We The People still do not have a definitive answer from you or anyone else in the Biden administration Regarding the FBI presence and participation in the months leading up to the November election and in the weeks days prior to January 6 and on January 6 here in D. C. We can't get a straight answer, although we have a tremendous amount of evidence harvested and reviewed over the course of the last year, which you will see in September, Stephen D'Artano, formerly in charge of the FBI's field office in Washington, D. C, testified to the House Judiciary Committee that he was aware The FBI informants would attend the Stop the Steal rally thrown on January 6. You confirm that the FBI had confidential human sources at the Stop the Steal rally on January 6 here in DC, sir? Speaker 1: Congressman, as we've discussed before, 4, I'm not gonna get into where we have or have not used confidential human sources, but what I Okay. Well, now you You asked for a definitive Speaker 0: bonus. My time. You said, no, you're not going to answer. That's cool. We're watching. The moment will come. This is my time. Earlier this year, an FBI informant who is reported to have his under oath marched to the US Capitol with fellow Proud Boys members on January 6. He said he was communicating with his FBI handler while people were entering the US capital. Can you confirm that the FBI had that sort of engagement with your own agents embedded within to the crowd on January 6th. Speaker 1: If you are asking whether the violence at the Capitol on January 6th was part of some operation orchestrated by FBI sources and or agents, The answer is emphatically You're saying no? No. You're saying no? Violence orchestrated by FBI sources or agents. Speaker 0: Are you familiar with with you know what a ghost vehicle is? Director or director of the FBI, certainly should. You know what a ghost bus is? Speaker 1: A ghost bus? Speaker 0: Ghost bus. Speaker 1: I'm not sure I've used that term before. Speaker 0: Okay. It was pretty common in in law enforcement. It's a vehicle That's used for secret purposes. It's painted over. These 2 buses in the middle here, They were the 1st to arrive at Union Station on January 6th, 0500. I have all this evidence. I'm showing you tip of the iceberg. Speaker 2: Mister chairman. Speaker 0: These 2 buses Mister chairman completely white. Speaker 2: Point of order. Point of order. Sure. Just run over the time. I understand, but you'll recall that Ms. Jackson Lee has been allowed to go 2 minutes before. I've been very fair in letting people finish their questioning Throughout my tenure as chairman, and I'll continue to be fair on that regard. But I will make a note to the members, if you could stay as close within your time as possible, we have a lot of people that wanna these gentlemen questions. So with that, the gentleman yields, but, your your point I've been very fair in this, Mister Ivy, with everybody on this side of the aisle just as I don't think I accused you of being unfair, mister chairman. You're you're making it more. Okay. Thank you. I now recognize now recognize mister Blake. Speaker 0: Close this this statement? No. Speaker 2: I I think I think your time is Speaker 0: I note that other members across the aisle have been granted time and I object to my question being closed. This is a very significant hearing, mister chairman, and these buses are nefarious in nature and were filled with FBI informants stressed as Trump supporters, deployed onto our capital on January 6th. Your day is coming.

@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire

Why was this man uncuffed out of sight and fist bumped by the officers? Because they were working together on January 6th. https://t.co/4jTag47VG4

@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire

Capitol Police calmly escorted protesters into the Capitol Building on January 6th https://t.co/iECJZWy47s

@Timcast - Tim Pool

The police led large groups of tourists into the building, cleared the way, opened doors, and gave directions These people were tricked by the USCP and now the Democrats are using their Big Lie to try to remove Trump https://t.co/B2axonUW2z

@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire

Not nice, officer https://t.co/jv3TgImTDE

@BrandonStraka - Brandon Straka

🚨NEW J6 FOOTAGE: Capitol Police shove elderly woman backwards down stairs. https://t.co/ekxdCWy6Fo

Saved - December 8, 2023 at 12:20 AM

@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire

German biologist, JĂĽrgen O. Kirchner found DNA contamination in vials of the BioNTech-Pfizer COVID vaccine, up to 354 times the recommended limit, replicating the alarming findings of other scientists. https://t.co/GMtEfoE1t9

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker raises concerns about the WHO's failures and the contamination of mRNA vaccines with DNA. They mention a research team in the US finding high levels of DNA contamination in the vaccine. German investigations also found significant exceedances of the allowable DNA limit. The speaker highlights the distribution of the vaccine throughout the body, including the ovaries, and appeals to the chairwoman to address the issue for vaccinated women of childbearing age. They mention having evidence to share but were prohibited from doing so. The speaker directs interested individuals to their website for more information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sehr geehrte Frau Vorsitzende, sehr geehrte Anwesende, Frau Willschrei hat darauf verwiesen, dass es ein prominentes Beispiel dafür gibt, dass die WHO Versäumnisse es sich erlaubt hat, die einfach nicht sein dürfen. Wenn der WHO Generaldirektor eine Pandemie ausruft, führt es nach den gegenwärtigen Plänen dazu, dass binnen hundert weil ein Impfstoff entwickelt werden soll, insbesondere ein mRNA Impfstoff. Jetzt hat aber Ein Forscherteam in den USA herausgefunden, dass dieser Impfstoff hochgradig mit DNA verunreinigt ist. Wir haben Untersuchungen machen lassen in Deutschland mit deutschen Chargen, fünf Stück, von einem renommierten Labor in Magdeburg von Frau Professor König. Der Grenzwert Für DNA, die in parinteralen Arzneimitteln enthalten sein darf ist zehn Nanogramm. Gefunden wurden zweitausendachthundertfünfunddreißig Nanogramm, zweitausenddreihundertvierunddreißig Nanogramm, Tausendvierzehn Nanogramm, fünfunddreißig tausend, dreitausendfünfhundertvierzig Nanogramm und achthundertvierunddreißig Gramm ein Hannogramm. Das sind gigantische Überschreitungen von einem Grenzwert für ein wirklich sehr bedenkliches und Arzneimittel und dieses Arzneimittel wird nach Daten, die die australische Zulassungsbehörde Veröffentlicht hat im ganzen Körper verteilt, unter anderem in die Eierstöcke. Und Frau Vorsitzende, Und ich möchte gerne an Sie appellieren, was Sie Ihren geimpften Mitbürgerinnen mitteilen, die noch gebärfähig sind oder erst gebärfähig werden, wie damit umgegangen wird, dass DNA in die Eierstöcke der geimpften Frauen letztendlich injiziert wird. Und wir haben Beweise vorbereitet, die wir gerne an Sie geteilt hätten. Das wurde uns von der Vorsitzenden untersagt. Wenn jemand die Beweise sehen will, kann er das auf meiner Website tun WWW Genimpfstoffe Punkt d e.
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 11:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
DNA contamination has been discovered in mRNA COVID vaccines, according to cancer genomics expert Dr. Phillip Buckhaults. He testified to the South Carolina Senate, highlighting that the Pfizer vaccine contains plasmid DNA alongside mRNA. This contamination could potentially lead to serious side effects like cardiac arrest and autoimmune attacks. Additionally, there is a theoretical risk of future cancer. Each vaccine dose may contain around 200 billion pieces of this plasmid DNA.

@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire

🚨BREAKING: DNA Contamination Found in mRNA COVID Vaccines Cancer Genomics Expert, Dr. Phillip Buckhaults, testified to the South Carolina Senate on the DNA Contamination Found in mRNA COVID Vaccines. Dr. Buckhaults and his team are the inventors of the COVID-19 spit test that was used nationally during the pandemic. Some quotes from the clip: "The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA." "It could be causing some of the rare, but serious, side effects like death from cardiac arrest." "It could cause a sustained autoimmune attack towards that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer.." "There's probably about 200 billion pieces of this plasmid DNA in each dose of the vaccine.."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Philip Buchholtz, a cancer genomics researcher, discusses his concerns about the Pfizer vaccine. He explains that the vaccine contains DNA, which has the potential to integrate into cells and cause long-term effects, such as autoimmune reactions and cancer. Buchholtz conducted DNA sequencing on vaccine samples and found that there were millions of copies of DNA in each dose. He suggests that further research should be done to investigate the potential risks. Buchholtz believes that the inclusion of DNA in the vaccine was likely an oversight rather than intentional, but he emphasizes the need for regulatory oversight and proper evaluation of the vaccine's safety.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Philip Buchholtz. I'm a, I have a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology. I'm a cancer gene jock. Basically, I do cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina. What that means is that I'm kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get fussed with during your lifetime and which which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't, okay? So technically, that means that I'm very, very skilled in in the art of DNA sequencing. Okay, I can figure out the sequence of things that I didn't know what I was looking for, and I'm also pretty good, when I say I, I mean, the people in my laboratory, You're not gonna hear their names but there's a group of people that do this excellent work. We're really good at, detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they're not supposed to be, even if they're at real low levels. And we used those skills during the pandemic. We invented the COVID test that many of you did a spit test. That came out of my lab because we were really good at that kind of stuff. In my professional evaluation literature. The Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job at keeping the people out of the cemetery, but it sucked at stopping the pandemic. And I still believe that, it was deployed mostly in good faith, but there were a lot of shortcuts taken. I'm sure many of you have heard of Occam's razor, right? Choose the simplest of explanations. Well, there's another one called Hanlon's razor, which is never attributed malice to that which which can be better explained by incompetence. And so I'm trying to be gracious here in many circumstances. There could be malice underneath, but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious. So, the Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with Asthma DNA. It's not just mRNA. It's got bits of DNA in it. This DNA is the DNA vector that was used the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA. The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Columbia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the college of pharmacy and for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well, the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them. He gave them all to me and I looked at them. We had 2 batches that were given out here in Columbia And I checked these 2 batches and I checked them by sequencing. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine and I can And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there. And you can kind of work out what it is and how it got there. And I'm kind of alarmed about the Possible consequences of this, both in terms of human health and biology, but you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there. So this DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. There's a lot of cases now of people having suspicious death after vaccine. It's hard to prove what It's just temporally associated. And this DNA is a plausible mechanism. This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells That got transfected with the vaccine mix. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in. We pour it onto cells and and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent It's not just a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore. Amen. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's it's it's different from RNA because it can be permanent. This It's a real hazard for genome modification of long lived somatic cells, like stem cells. It's all a theoretical concern, but it's pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology. That it could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. Depending on where in the genome this it's a very good question. I think it's a very good question. I think it's a very good question. I think it's a very good question. To figure out if this is happening or not. And again, the autoimmunity thing is not my wheelhouse. I'm not an immunologist, but Cancer risk is that's my bag. I know this is a thing and it is a possibility. Nerdy science here, the central dogma of molecular biology is that DNA gets transcribed into RNA, okay? And then RNA gets translated into protein. This is just how life runs. Why does this matter? Well, DNA, for the purposes of This discussion, DNA is a long lived information storage device. Okay? What you were born with, you're gonna die with and pass on to your kids. DNA lasts for 100 of 1000 of years, and it can last for generations if you can pass it on to your kids. Right? So alterations to the DNA, they stick RNA, by its nature, is temporary. It doesn't last. And that feature of RNA was other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, Speaker 1: the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the Speaker 0: other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the research that I do. I do the research that I do. Speaker 1: I do the research that I do. I do the Speaker 0: research that I do for hours to days. But something that makes its way into DNA has the potential to last for a very long time, maybe a lifetime. So, This is a picture of the sequencing read that, the sequencing run that I did, in the lab, from a couple of batches of the Pfizer vaccine. And all those little bitty lines here are the the last few years. I've been working on a lot of the work that I've done in the past, and I've been working on a lot of the work that I've done in the past, and I've been working on a lot of them. This little graph here in the middle is the size distribution that peaks around 100 base pairs, 120 base pairs. So the The DNA pieces that are in the vaccine are short little pieces. 100, 120. There's some that are about 500 base There's a few that are even 5,000, but most of them are around 100 base pairs. Why is this important? Because the probability of a piece of DNA integrating into the human genome is unrelated to its size. So your genome risk is just a function of how many particles there are. So it's like, you know, if you shoot a shotgun at a washboard, if you Allagas to buckshot. You have many, many thousands of opportunities to modify, a cell of a vaccinated person. The pieces are very small because during the process, they chopped them up to try to make them go away, but they It increased the hazard of genome modification in the process. That's how this got here. In my view, Somebody should go about sequencing DNA samples from stem cells of people who are vaccinated and find out If this theoretical risk has happened or not, I think this is a real serious oversight regulatory oversight that happened at the federal level and somebody should force this to happen somewhere. Yeah. It's we do that kind of But in order for it to be trustworthy, it by the public, this has to be done by lots of people. Right? Okay. I'll talk to you more about that later. Yeah. This is our our deal. This is why I know this should've been done at the federal level. And we use them to glue together what the source DNA must have been. Again, this is what we do in the lab all the time. And all these little red and green lines here, these are all independent little pieces of DNA. And you can put them all back together and see what they came from is this circle over here. It's a plasmid that you can go shopping online to buy from Agilent. And it's clear that Pfizer, took this plasmid and then they cloned Spike into it, and and they used it for in a process called in vitro transcription translation, where you feed, an RNA polymerase this plasmid and it makes a whole bunch of mRNA copies for you. Okay? And then you take this mRNA, you mix it with the lipid nanoparticle transfection reagent, and now you've got your mRNA a vaccine, but they failed to get the DNA out before they did this. So these little pieces, they did make some effort to chop it up. So all these little pieces The plasma got packaged in with the RNA. That's clear as day what happened just from the forensics of looking at the DNA sequencing. A little bit of a regulatory note here. The way you do RNA transcription, in vitro transcription reactions, you have to give it a DNA template. And you can give it a DNA template that is just a synthetic piece of DNA That is only the instructions to make the RNA. And that's what was done for getting the, CEUs authorization, and a clinical trial. It's called Process One, if you look up that kind of stuff. They made a PCR product of just the bits that they wanted and Then they did the in vitro transcription, made a bunch of RNA of that. There was no plasma DNA to contaminate the stuff that was used for the trial. But making that PCR The PCR product doesn't scale the way that was necessary to vaccinate the whole world. So a cheaper way to scale up the production of this It is to clone that PCR product into this plasma vector, put the plasma vector into bacteria, and then grow up big vats of the bacteria. They Make a lot of the plasma DNA for you, then you use that plasma DNA as the template to drive this transcription reaction to make your RNA. Not in the stuff that was used for the authorization trials. So I know it's a little bit of nerdy science, but it has We can measure the quantity of this stuff pretty easy in the lab. We're good at doing this stuff. This is the same. We made a little PC a colleague of mine at MIT who used to work for the Broad Institute at MIT, Same idea and same expertise behind it. And we can quantify exactly how much of this stuff is in a vaccine or any other tissue. And I estimate that there were about 2,000,000,000 copies of the 1 piece that we're looking for in every dose. And if you look back at that map I showed you where it's all these little the little piece of everything else. So what this means is that there's probably about 200,000,000,000 pieces of this plasma DNA in each dose of the vaccine. And it's encapsulated in this lipid nano particle So it's ready to be delivered inside the cell. This is a bad idea. My conclusions from this, we should check a bunch of people. Next question. I'm just curious if you could just and tissue samples, especially if we focus on harmed people. But that's not necessary. We could also just focus on regular, unharmed people And I'm a little bit confused about the fact that there. One of the reasons why I'm focusing on this is because it's kind of different from a lot of the other imagined harms where you Can't really prove it. You can be suspicious because of the timing, but you can't really prove it. This one, you can prove it because it leaves a calling card. You find it in the stem cells of harmed people. It's equivalent to finding a certain type of lead in someone who is now dead. It's pretty reasonable to assume that that's what caused it. The royal we, meaning you guys, other things that we're doing. And so we're I'm a real fan of this platform, okay? I think it has the potential to treat cancers. I really and right now, I think the financial incentives are too great to just keep on rolling with it and it's going to take some Encouragement to get it out. I don't think that the amounts there actually exceed the regulation limits. In some batches, it may. In the 2 batches that I looked at, one of them, it was just under the limit and one, it was just over the limit. My colleague in Boston has looked at a fair number of other batches. And there's a handful that are super high and there's a handful that are super low. But the fact that there is a regulatory threshold vaccines are like a recombinant protein or a dead virus, an attenuated virus produced in CHO cells or and the DNA that might be in it is naked DNA. And you might have a little bit of that in the vaccine. That's not a problem Because naked DNA gets chewed up immediately upon vaccination and there's no real mechanism for it to get inside the cells. They inappropriately applied that regulatory limit to this new kind of vaccine where everything is encapsulated in this lipid nanoparticle. It's basically packaged in a synthetic virus So I'm thinking Hanlon's razor here. Okay? I don't think there was anything nefarious here. I think it was just kind of a dumb oversight. And it's gonna take because the financial incentives are so great to just, you know, And the career incentives of people that approve this are going to be, there's nothing wrong here. It's going to take some encouragement to make people But I really believe this was an inappropriate application of an old school regulation.
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 3:24 AM

@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire

@KimDotcom Some receipts of the US installing Ukraine's "elected" officials https://t.co/DzEoBTYBUV

@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire

🚨 EXPOSED: Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland & US Ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyat are caught selecting Ukrainian politicians Victoria wanted to put into the Ukrainian government. 🇺🇸 All of them corrupt, US paid traitors. 🦠Watch until the end for bonus footage of Victoria Nuland and Marco Rubio discussing biological research facilities in Ukraine. 𝙏𝒓𝙖𝒏𝙨𝒄𝙧𝒊𝙥𝒕 Nuland: What do you think? Pyatt: I think we're in play. The Klitschko [Vitaly Klitschko, one of three main opposition leaders] piece is obviously the complicated electron here. Especially the announcement of him as deputy prime minister and you've seen some of my notes on the troubles in the marriage right now so we're trying to get a read really fast on where he is on this stuff. But I think your argument to him, which you'll need to make, I think that's the next phone call you want to set up, is exactly the one you made to Yats [Arseniy Yatseniuk, another opposition leader]. And I'm glad you sort of put him on the spot on where he fits in this scenario. And I'm very glad that he said what he said in response. Nuland: Good. I don't think Klitsch should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary, I don't think it's a good idea. Pyatt: Yeah. I guess... in terms of him not going into the government, just let him sort of stay out and do his political homework and stuff. I'm just thinking in terms of sort of the process moving ahead we want to keep the moderate democrats together. The problem is going to be Tyahnybok [Oleh Tyahnybok, the other opposition leader] and his guys and I'm sure that's part of what [President Viktor] Yanukovych is calculating on all this. Nuland: [Breaks in] I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. He's the... what he needs is Klitsch and Tyahnybok on the outside. He needs to be talking to them four times a week, you know. I just think Klitsch going in... he's going to be at that level working for Yatseniuk, it's just not going to work. Pyatt: Yeah, no, I think that's right. OK. Good. Do you want us to set up a call with him as the next step? Nuland: My understanding from that call - but you tell me - was that the big three were going into their own meeting and that Yats was going to offer in that context a... three-plus-one conversation or three-plus-two with you. Is that not how you understood it? Pyatt: No. I think... I mean that's what he proposed but I think, just knowing the dynamic that's been with them where Klitschko has been the top dog, he's going to take a while to show up for whatever meeting they've got and he's probably talking to his guys at this point, so I think you reaching out directly to him helps with the personality management among the three and it gives you also a chance to move fast on all this stuff and put us behind it before they all sit down and he explains why he doesn't like it. Nuland: OK, good. I'm happy. Why don't you reach out to him and see if he wants to talk before or after. Pyatt: OK, will do. Thanks. Nuland: OK... one more wrinkle for you Geoff. [A click can be heard] I can't remember if I told you this, or if I only told Washington this, that when I talked to Jeff Feltman [United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs] this morning, he had a new name for the UN guy Robert Serry did I write you that this morning? Pyatt: Yeah I saw that. Nuland: OK. He's now gotten both Serry and [UN Secretary General] Ban Ki-moon to agree that Serry could come in Monday or Tuesday. So that would be great, I think, to help glue this thing and to have the UN help glue it and, you know, Fuck the EU. Pyatt: No, exactly. And I think we've got to do something to make it stick together because you can be pretty sure that if it does start to gain altitude, that the Russians will be working behind the scenes to try to torpedo it. And again the fact that this is out there right now, I'm still trying to figure out in my mind why Yanukovych (garbled) that. In the meantime there's a Party of Regions faction meeting going on right now and I'm sure there's a lively argument going on in that group at this point. But anyway we could land jelly side up on this one if we move fast. So let me work on Klitschko and if you can just keep... we want to try to get somebody with an international personality to come out here and help to midwife this thing. The other issue is some kind of outreach to Yanukovych but we probably regroup on that tomorrow as we see how things start to fall into place. Nuland: So on that piece Geoff, when I wrote the note [US vice-president's national security adviser Jake] Sullivan's come back to me VFR [direct to me], saying you need [Vice-President] Biden and I said probably tomorrow for an atta-boy and to get the deets [details] to stick. So Biden's willing.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the involvement of Klitschko in the government and the need to keep moderate Democrats together. They agree that Klitschko should stay out and focus on his political work, while Yatsenyuk should be the main figure with support from Taniybook. They plan to set up a call with Klitschko to discuss this. They also mention a meeting with the big three and the possibility of a three-way conversation. They discuss the UN's involvement and the need to stick together against Russian interference. They mention concerns about Russian forces gaining control of Ukrainian biological research facilities. They believe any biological or chemical attack in Ukraine would be orchestrated by the Russians.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you think? Speaker 1: I think we're in play. The Klitschko piece is obviously the complicated electron here, especially the announcement of him as Deputy Prime Minister. And you've seen some of my notes on the troubles in the marriage right now. So we're trying to get read really fast on where he is on this stuff. But I think your argument to him, which you'll need to make, I think that's the next phone call we want to set up, is exactly the one you made to Yachts. And I'm glad you sort of put him on the spot on where he fits in this scenario. And I'm very glad he said what he said in response. Speaker 0: Good. So, I don't think Klitsch should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea. Speaker 1: Yes, I mean, I guess you think in terms of him not going into the government, just let him sort stay out and do his political homework and stuff. I'm just thinking in terms of sort of the process moving ahead, we want to keep the moderate Democrats together. The problem is going to be tiny book and his guys. And I'm sure that's part of what Janneke was just calculating on all of this. I kind of Speaker 0: I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. He's the guy you know, What he needs is Klitsch and Tani book on the outside. He needs to be talking to them 4 times a week. I just think Klitsch going in, he's Going to be at that level working for Yatinuke, it's just not going to work. Speaker 1: Yes. No, I think that's right. Okay. Good. Well, do you want us to try Speaker 2: to set up call attempt is the next step. Speaker 0: My understanding from that call, but you tell me was that the big three were going into their own meeting And that Yats was going to offer in that context a three way the three plus one conversation or three plus two with you. Is that not how you understood it? Speaker 1: No. I think I mean, that's what he proposed. But I think just knowing the dynamic that's been with them where Klitschko has been the top dog. He's going to take a while to show up for whatever meeting they've got and he's probably talking to his guys at this point. So I think you reaching out directly to him helps with the personality management among the 3, and it gives you also a chance to move fast on all this stuff and put us behind it before they all sit down and he explains why he doesn't like it. Sure. Okay. Will do. Thanks. Speaker 0: Okay. I've now written oh, one more wrinkle for you, Jeff. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: I can't remember if I told you this or if I only told Washington When I talked to Jeff Feldman this morning, he had a new name for the UN guy, Robert Sery. Did I write you that this morning? Speaker 1: Yes, I saw that. Speaker 0: He's now gotten both Saree and Bon Quimoun to agree that Saree could come in Monday or Tuesday. Okay. So that would be great I think to help glue this thing and have the UN help glue it and fuck the EU. Speaker 1: No, exactly. And I think we've got to do something to make it stick together because you can be pretty sure that if it does start to gain altitude, the Russians will be working behind the scenes to try to torpedo it. And again, the fact that this is out there right now, I'm still trying to figure out in my mind why Yanukovych that. But in the meantime, there is a party of regions faction meeting going on right now and I'm sure there is a lively argument going on in that group at this point. But anyway, we could land Jellyside up on this one if we move fast. So let me work on Klitschko and if you can just Klitschko and if you can just keep I think we want to try to get somebody with an international personality to come out here and help the midwife thing. And then the other issue is some kind of outreach to Yanukovych, but we probably regroup on that tomorrow as we see how things start to fall into place. Speaker 0: So on that piece, Jeff, when I wrote the note, Sullivan's come back to me, VFR saying you need Biden And I said probably tomorrow for an attaboyan to get the deets to stick. So Biden's willing. Speaker 3: Thank you. Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons? Speaker 2: Ukraine has, biological research facilities, which, in fact, we are now quite concerned Russian troops Russian forces may be seeking to, gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can Prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of, Russian forces should they approach. Speaker 3: I'm sure you're aware that the Russian propaganda groups are already putting out there all kinds of information about how they've uncovered a plot by the Ukrainians to release biological weapons in the country and with NATO's coordination. If there's a biological or chemical weapon incident or, or attack inside of Ukraine. Is there any doubt in your mind that 100% it would be the Russians that would be behind it? Speaker 2: There is no doubt in my mind, senator, and it is
Saved - September 17, 2023 at 8:35 PM

@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire

I shortened it up for you.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The pandemic created numerous new billionaires in the pharmaceutical industry, with companies like Moderna and Pfizer making massive profits from the COVID-19 vaccine. Many members of Congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies. Pfizer's chairman claimed they developed the vaccine for the benefit of humanity, but the company still made a staggering $100 billion in profit. This raises questions about an economic system where pharmaceutical companies profit from emergencies, similar to how the military-industrial complex benefits from war and energy companies benefit from energy crises. Such a system perpetuates states of crisis, prioritizing the interests of the elite over ordinary people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The pandemic created at least 40 new big pharma billionaires. Pharmaceutical corporations like Moderna and Pfizer made $1,000 of profit every second from the COVID nineteen vaccine. More than 2 thirds of congress received campaign funding from pharmaceutical companies in the 2020 election. Pfizer chairman, Albert Bourla, told Time Magazine in July 2020, the company was developing the COVID vaccine for the good of humanity, not for money. And of course, Pfizer made $100,000,000,000 in profit in 2022. When it came to the profits, they took the profits. When it came to the funding, you paid for the funding. All I'm querying is this. Yes. It's if you have an economic system in which pharmaceutical companies benefit hugely from medical emergencies, where a military industrial complex benefits from war, where energy companies benefit from energy crisis, you are going to generate states of perpetual crisis So the interests of ordinary people, separate from the interests of the elite.
View Full Interactive Feed