TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @iAnonPatriot
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Bill Clinton SMILES while admitting to getting “back rubs” from women linked to Jeffrey Epstein.. What a POS! https://t.co/3Ld7SuQu3G
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the exchange, Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 whether there was contact with an individual named Shaunte Davies. Speaker 1 recognizes the name as distinctive and says that Shaunte Davies was the name of one of the flight attendants on a 2002 Africa trip. Speaker 0 then questions whether Shaunte or any other young female on that trip was underage at the time. Speaker 1 responds that, to their knowledge, there was no one underage.
Following up, Speaker 0 asks whether Speaker 1 ever received a massage or had any physical contact from Shaunte Davies or anyone else on that trip. Speaker 1 acknowledges that there were pictures in view and recounts one specific instance: there was a time when Speaker 1 was sitting up and received a back rub and a neck rub. Speaker 1 adds that they think Shantay performed the back and neck rub, but they are not sure. No additional details beyond this single massage instance are provided in the exchange.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you ever had contact with an individual by the name of Shaunte Davies?
Speaker 1: I believe Shaunte was that's a distinctive name, and so I I think that was the name of one of his flight attendants.
Speaker 0: Okay. She's been described on being on a 2002 Africa trip and providing massages. Was she or any other young female on that trip underage at that time?
Speaker 1: Not that I'm aware of.
Speaker 0: Okay. Did you ever receive a massage or have physical contact from her or anyone else on that trip?
Speaker 1: You've seen the pictures. There was one time when I was sitting up and I got a back rub, a neck rub.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: And I think Shantay did it, but I'm not sure.
Speaker 0: Okay.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
All the women on The View are in FULL PANIC MODE because their names appear in the Epstein files.. “We did nothing wrong — All we did was go to some parties or something..” 👀 https://t.co/MFOzMAmaHQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker A: We're on the list because we were at a party or a wedding or something that somebody might have been. That's what I found out anyway. The guy was at Trump's wedding to Marla. Right. Maybe Epstein was there too. Who knows? I don't know. So that means that I'm not guilty, obviously. But these other ones, how are you going to decide who's really guilty and who's not?
Speaker B: It's very tricky. I think it no. I think it's it's very I think it's very clear because when you when if you look, you know why my name is there. Because someone was looking for a plane, and that's what people do. They go to all the people who have private planes and say, do you have one? I didn't get on the plane? I didn't know they were looking for a plane. Yeah. I had no idea that the plane that I was supposed to be on was no longer available. So so I'm named in there like Whoopi Goldberg is needs a plane. There are a lot of people—Speaker A: that are named Marilyn Monroe was on the list. Yes. There were plenty of people that were were plenty of people named in in the list that that may have not done anything wrong. Yeah. But I think that there are a lot of people that are on their list that are guilty of wrongdoing.
Speaker A: And I have no confidence, unfortunately. It gives me no pleasure to say I—
Speaker B: I think they are going to hold on, Joy. I think they are going to they're going to do it like, you know, how you eat around an apple till you get to the core? Yes. I think that's how they're gonna do it. They're gonna eat all this stuff all around here. I need a of gonna get, hopefully, then they'll get to the court.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're on the list because we were at a party or a wedding or something that somebody might have been. That's what I found out anyway.
Speaker 1: Yeah. No. I I
Speaker 0: The guy was at Trump's wedding to Marla. Right. Maybe Epstein was there too. Who knows? I don't know.
So that means that I'm not guilty, obviously. But these other ones, how are you going to decide who's really guilty and who's not?
Speaker 1: It's very tricky. I think it no. I think it's it's very I think it's very clear because when you when if you look, you know why my name is there. Because someone was looking for a plane, and that's what people do. They go to all the people who have private planes and say, do you have one?
Speaker 0: And you didn't get on the plane?
Speaker 1: I didn't get on the I didn't know they were looking for a plane. Yeah. I had no idea that the plane that I was supposed to be on was no longer available. So so I'm named in there like Whoopi Goldberg is needs a plane.
Speaker 0: There are a lot
Speaker 1: of people
Speaker 0: that are named Marilyn Monroe was on the list. Yes. There were plenty of people that were were plenty of people named in in the list that that may have not done anything wrong. Yeah. But I think that there are a lot of people that are on their list that are guilty of wrongdoing.
And I have no confidence, unfortunately. It gives me no pleasure to say I
Speaker 1: think that they are going to hold on,
Speaker 0: Joy.
Speaker 1: I think they are going to they're going to do it like, you know, how you eat around an apple till you get to the core? Yes. I think that's how they're gonna do it. They're gonna eat all this stuff all all around here. I need a of gonna get, hopefully, then they'll get to the court.
I have
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
WOKE Pastor kicks to boys out of her Pride Festival for wearing ‘Jesus Loves You’ shirts.. 👀 https://t.co/8EgCZ6Wjwf
Video Transcript AI Summary
Checklist for the summary approach:
- Identify who is speaking, the setting, and the main conflict.
- Capture the sequence of events: request to stop recording, safety/trespassing concerns, and removal.
- Note the positions of the involved groups (church members vs volunteers/neutral observers) and their stated reasons.
- Preserve key phrases and claims that drive the narrative, especially surprising or pivotal ones.
- Emphasize outcomes and the emotional tone without adding analysis or judgments.
- Translate any non-English content (not applicable here) and keep the summary within 375–469 words.
Summary:
At a Pride Festival, a scene unfolds around a confrontation between church-affiliated individuals and people recording interactions. A pastor or church leader, referencing healing and restoration, states that the church will not teach about shame, judgment, or sin, while asserting that the current environment is not appropriate for their presence. Two volunteers or observers, who say they are neutral and simply checking in, are approached by the pastor. The pastor explains that some people have been recording to obtain clips and that such activity makes attendees uncomfortable, suggesting that those present should be supporters rather than spectators filming conversations. He asks that they not conduct recordings at that location.
One of the volunteers asks a question about documenting content, clarifying that they are not bashing or holding signs, and seeking understanding of the restrictions. The pastor reiterates the concern, emphasizing discomfort among attendees and the boundary that such activity creates. He implies that the behavior is inappropriate in that setting and indicates a preference for filming to occur elsewhere. The volunteer is then told by another person (likely church leadership) that the recording is effectively causing disruption and that the individuals should leave.
A subsequent remark frames the situation as a broader commentary on society, with a line suggesting “this is what happens when truth leaves society,” followed by a cryptic aside about underwear and a recurring note about the shirt that inspired the confrontation: “you wear a Jesus love you shirt and you get kicked out of a pride festival.” After the exchange, the volunteers depart, and a closing sentiment from the participants includes expressions like “Jesus love you,” acknowledgment of “dudes in tutus,” and a final assertion that Jesus is king above all. The overall tone shifts from procedural discussion about recording and trespassing to a public, reflective moment about the clash of beliefs and public expressions at the festival.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You wear a Jesus Love You shirt and get kicked
Speaker 1: out of a Pride Festival. That's what happens.
Speaker 2: I'm a pastor. Of course, I believe in healing brokenness, but you will never hear about shame, judgment, or even sin at this church. Right here's good, guys. What's up? You can't tell me your name again.
I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Mason.
Speaker 2: Mason. It's Harlan. It's a pleasure.
Speaker 1: JC.
Speaker 2: So are y'all here at support at JP? Because I have a concern that y'all aren't.
Speaker 1: We're we're just neutral. We're just checking in and just talking to people.
Speaker 2: Yeah. So the the recording, some people have been doing that to try to get the to get clips like what you're doing right now. Yeah. Definitely worth Why do you get clips of us saying something? So it's uncomfortable for people because it doesn't feel like your energy is really your supporters.
And so we want people here as supporters. And for those that even if you're neutral, that's fine. But I'm gonna ask that y'all do this someplace else and not here.
Speaker 1: Well, so pastor here. Can I ask a question? Is that cool?
Speaker 2: It's here. Quickly here. Back back in. No. Yeah.
I just
Speaker 1: have a question. So when it comes to, like, like, content, what you guys do, like, what what would be the problem of just, like, documenting it? So Like, not because we're not we're not bashing it. We're not holding signs. Like, I hear you.
Speaker 2: And this right here, it's just concerning. It's just makes people uncomfortable, and
Speaker 1: You go by saying.
Speaker 3: At this point, though, she's with the church leadership. She asked you to leave. So you're criminally trespassing them. So I would have to advise her to leave.
Speaker 1: Okay. Thank you. Yeah. Have a good Have a good one. You too.
Alright. Is just how this is what happens when truth leaves society. Chaos ensues. No. I'm a suzer.
The the the underwear. You wear
Speaker 0: a Jesus love you shirt and you
Speaker 1: get kicked out of a pride festival. That's what Hey. Thank you guys for what you do. Know most of you guys probably don't believe in this crap, but it's okay. You guys are doing your job.
It's all good. Jesus love you guys. Jesus love you, brother. Crazy. We got dudes in tutus, so it's not good, bro.
It's all good. Jesus is king above all. That's all I'm having.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Minneapolis Mayor, Jacob Frey, speaks Somali to his supporters. FFS. https://t.co/cuoyIYdHHI
Video Transcript AI Summary
Jacob Fry, Maayorka Minneapolis, ayaa si toos ah ugu hadlay bulshada Soomaaliyeed: Minneapolis waa magaaladaada, haddii aad ka soo jeedo Mogadishu, Getaway, Hargeysa, Bosaso, Medoa, ama Kismaayo, Minneapolis waxay tahay magaaladaada. Waa magaalo kala duwan, midaysan, oo xoog badan. In kasta oo Trump soo bandhigo siyaasado cusub, Minneapolis waxay idin taagan tahay oo qiimeysaa waxaad tahay iyo waxaad keento. Waxaan idiin rajeynayaa nasiib wanaagsan kuna rajeynayaa waqti wanaagsan oo aad la qaadataan qoysaskiina. Sharaxaadda Trump ee xayiraadda socdaalka waxay ku saleysan tahay hal Masri ah oo nacaybkiisa u oggolaaday inuu ku fido rabshad kaga dhacday Yuhuudda aan dambi lahayn Colorado. Fikradan waa khatar. Cadaaladda waxay tahay in qof kasta la hayo ficiladiisa gaar ah. Ka joojinta diaspora oo dhan ma ilaalin doonto; waxay keentaa kala qaybsanaan. Xiriirka Soomaaliya iyo Minneapolis waa mid dheer, mana ogolaan doonno bannaanada Trump inay Soomaali ku kala fogeeyaan, asxaabteena iyo asxaabta aan jeclahay.
Jacob Fry, the Mayor of Minneapolis, spoke directly to the Somali community: Minneapolis is your city, whether you come from Mogadishu, Getaway, Hargeysa, Bosaso, Medoa, or Kismaayo. Minneapolis is a diverse, united, strong city. Even if President Trump introduces new policies, Minneapolis stands with you and values who you are and what you bring. I wish you well and hope you spend good time with your families. The explanation for Trump’s travel ban is based on one Egyptian national who allowed his hatred to spill into violence against innocent Jewish people in Colorado. That logic is dangerous. Justice means holding each person to their own actions. Cutting off an entire diaspora won’t protect anyone; it deepens division. The bond between Somalia and Minneapolis is long, and we will not let Trump’s bans alienate Somalis, our neighbors and friends we love.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jacob Fry, Dokema Gallaudet, Minneapolis. Daman, Shabka, Somaliade, Kayemid, Mogadishu, Geroway, Harkesa, Mosaso, Sharkey Minneapolis Wah Magallo Garnese Wanaga Iyo Kemaa Ad Ledehin Ugo Dan Ben T. Wahan Iddin Lehhe Eid Wanaxon Eid Mubarak My name is Jacob Fry, mayor of Minneapolis, and I wanna speak directly to the Somali community. Whether you come from Mogadishu, Getaway, Hargeisa, Bosaso, Medoa, or Kismayo, Minneapolis is your city. You are a vital part of the fabric that makes our city strong, diverse, and united.
No matter what policies may be introduced by president Donald Trump, Minneapolis stands with you and values who you are and what you bring to our city. I wish you all, and I hope you have a wonderful time with your loved ones. Donald Trump's justification for the travel ban hinges on one Egyptian national who allowed his hatred for Netanyahu's actions to spill over into violence against innocent Jewish people in Colorado. That logic is dangerous. Holding entire nations accountable for the actions of a few individuals is the very same fallacy.
Here in Minneapolis, people of every background have broken the law. And when they do, we hold them accountable as individuals. That's how justice works. Cutting off an entire diaspora from its roots doesn't keep anyone safe. It only deepens division at a time when connection is more important than ever.
The bond between Somalia and Minneapolis is long standing, and it's deep. We will not let Donald Trump's bans alienate our Somali residents, our neighbors, and friends whom we love.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Liberal woman wants to HIRE Charlie Kirk’s assassin to take out Trump.. We are at war. https://t.co/ZW1uzSYmvN
Video Transcript AI Summary
On one hand, I was praying for assassins to come back. On the other hand, how can we hire this nigga to get exactly who we want? He was so close. Now let's just try harder. Look at the pamphlet we sent out. There’s a *****
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On one hand, I was praying for assassins to come back. You know I'm saying? So on the other hand, how can we hire this nigga to get exactly who we want? Like, he was so close. Now let's just try harder.
You know what I'm saying? Look at the pamphlet we sent out. There's a
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
BREAKING 🚨 The mother of the Minneapolis trans school shooter, Mary Grace Westman, requests for people to respect her son’s preferred pronouns — he went by “she/her”. 👀 https://t.co/3WngRdn96z
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Liberal white woman repeatedly assauIts a man that she believes is an ICE agent.. WTF!? https://t.co/gc5HpX4gA3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 delivers a relentless barrage of questions and insults toward someone described as 'ice.' It opens with 'Are you ice garbage? Mom? Mom, let's go. Mom.' The speaker asks, 'Who are you? What's your name?' and asks, 'Are you ice?' 'Oh, you don't want me to take a picture of your face? Is that because you're ice?' The rant presses, 'Pop, what is this? Is this ice? Are you an ice piece of shit? Is that what you are?' It continues with, 'Are you some ice piece of shit? You some ice piece of shit? Some ice piece of shit? Is that what you are?' and ends, 'That what you are, some ice piece of shit? Fucking ice garbage. Are you ice garbage? Is that what you are? Ice garbage? Is that what you are?'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you ice garbage? Mom? Mom, let's go. Mom. Who are you?
What's your name? Are you ice? Oh, you don't want me to take a picture of your face? Is that because you're ice? What are you doing?
Who are you? Who are you? What is this? What is all this? What is this?
Pop, what is this? Is this ice? Are you an ice piece of shit? Is that what you are? Are some ice piece of shit?
Is that what you are? Because you won't say your name? Is that what you are? You some ice piece of shit? Are you some ice garbage person?
Is that what you are? You must be or you would have said. What are you doing? What are you doing? What are you doing?
Are you some ice piece of shit? You some ice piece of shit? Some ice piece of shit? Is that what you are? Is that what you are?
That what you are, some ice piece of shit? Fucking ice garbage. Are you ice garbage? Is that what you are? Ice garbage?
Is that what you are?
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
California sheriff promises to EXPOSE Gavin Newsom.. 👀 https://t.co/Rt1Di8Quph
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker addresses Gavin Newsom, declaring, "I am going to expose you for the complete fraud that you are, the liar that you are," and, "you will never ever be the president of this country." He says California's problems are "completely caused by California government," despite "the greatest businesses," "the greatest people," and "the greatest innovators, the greatest creators, the greatest entrepreneurs" there. He blames government for "overregulation, overregulation, activism" and says the aim is to restore balance where "government is supposed to be working for us" and "we are not supposed to be working to increase the size of government." He calls California "the laughing stock of the rest of the country" and "the world," recounting a Europe trip where a sommelier noted that "California" has "that crazy governor." He vows to "take it back," give "every kid growing up now" that dream, and help "the kids... from 20 to 35" who think it's impossible to make their California dream. He aims to "return the ability to look at that Gold Coast as the beacon for the rest of the country" and to have California be "the beacon for the rest of the country" again, so that "if you're gonna make it, you come to California to make it"—which is why he's running for governor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My message is Gavin Newsom. I am going to expose you for the complete fraud that you are, the liar that you are, and you will never ever be the president of this country. You will never do to the rest of the country what you have done to California. California's problems are completely caused by California government. We have the greatest businesses.
We have the greatest people. We have the greatest business minds, the the greatest innovators, the greatest creators, the greatest entrepreneurs in the country. We have the fourth largest economy that is is artificially propped up to be something good. And the thing that is preventing us from being great, from achieving that California dream that we once that I came here for, that the only thing preventing us is government. Government has its boot on our backs, keeping us down with overregulation, overregulation, activism, appeasement of activists instead of taking care of the majority of Californians as a whole.
And it's an agenda. It is a complete agenda of making sure that government is in control of all of our lives instead of us being in control of government. And so the only reason I'm doing this is to restore that balance. The balance is supposed to be that government is supposed to be working for us. We are not supposed to be working to increase the size of government.
And that's the only reason why California is no longer the greatest state in the country. You can you can have our politicians say it as much as they want, but we are the laughing stock of the rest of the country. We are the laughing stock of the world. My wife and I were fortunate enough to go to Europe last year, and we had a the first night there, we splurged. We had an an unbelievable dinner with a we we paid for a sommelier to come and and make sure that we learned everything about Italian wine and all of that stuff.
The first introduction's, where are you from? California. And he laughed. And he said, you guys have that crazy governor. And we're just looking at each other like, how would someone across the world know that we have a lunatic for a governor?
So we started talking about it, and he's like he's like, everyone wants to go to The United States, and it used to be everyone wants to go to California. Here, no one wants to go to California anymore. They'll go to California for Disney land. That's it. And it it's embarrassing.
It's absolutely embarrassing that we are no longer the greatest state in the country, and we're still all the same people. We're still all the same businesses. It's our government that has completely changed and brought us to this laughing stock position, and I'm going to take it back. I have to I take I take some blame for it because I wasn't standing on the rooftop yelling to everyone that we had to stop this. Stop this.
Look look what's going to happen. And so while I was concerned with my career, my life, my family, my own home, and making sure that I was secure, I kind of just wasn't paying attention to what government was doing, and now it's affecting everyone. So I will make sure that what I came to California for, my California dream, I will make sure that every kid growing up now has that dream, and they even the kids that now are from 20 to 35 that it's impossible for them to make their California dream. I'll make sure that I make up for it, and we return the ability to look at that that Gold Coast as the beacon for the rest of the country. And if you're gonna make it, you come to California to make it, and you work hard and you'll do it.
That has to happen again. And that's really the only reason I'm running for governor.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
This will NEVER get old. https://t.co/DRT0pjTVOS
Video Transcript AI Summary
You just think that anyone can come to The US, like Absolutely. If you go to the go to New York, go to the Statue Of Liberty, what to say, all is welcome. I just happened to pick up, three guys from Honduras. They're they're from Honduras, and they have nowhere to go. So this just works out perfect. Look. Hector takes medication twice a day. And right now, they gotta use the bathroom. All three of them going to shit. Is it cool if they stay here? No. Won't. Why not? I won't stay here. No. Won't. Do you mean? I don't know them. You called it. They won't leave you any deal. Alright. So they can't stay here then? You get it's cool if they come to the country, just not your fucking house? No.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You just think that anyone can come to The US, like Absolutely. If you go to the go to New York, go to the Statue Of Liberty, what to say, all is welcome. Dude, this is great because Okay. I just happened to pick up, three guys from Honduras. While they were at Home Depot.
They're they're from Honduras, and they have nowhere to go. So this just works out perfect. Look. Hector takes medication twice a day. Oh, okay.
And and right now, they gotta use the bathroom. All three of them going to shit. Is it cool if they stay here? No. Won't.
Why not? I won't stay here. No. Won't. Do you mean?
I don't know them. You called it. They won't leave you any deal. Alright. So they can't stay here then?
You get it's cool if they come to the country, just not your fucking house? No.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
I’m so glad we’re finally seeing these ghetto projects starting to get cleaned up. 👀 https://t.co/xpWSPsGVCm
Video Transcript AI Summary
They're fresh. Runner. Runner. Runner. Runner.
Runner. Got the fuck. We just got the fuck. I don't need now. Who this man, y'all?
Who this man? Who He put this man in handcuffs with no reason.
Hey. Don't push him. Y'all Don't push them.
He had no reason to put this man in handcuffs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They're fresh. Runner. Runner. Runner. Runner.
Runner. Got the fuck. We just got the fuck. I don't need now. Who this man, y'all?
Who this man? Who He put this man in handcuffs with no reason. Hey. Don't push him. Y'all Don't push them.
He had no reason to put this man in handcuffs.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Woke Pastor tells children that the rainbow in Noah’s Ark story is a symbol of LGBTQ.. Thoughts?? https://t.co/l6LMTiJP8g
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses symbols from the Noah's Ark story, including the olive leaf and the rainbow. The rainbow is identified as a symbol for LGBTQ+ people. The speaker points out rainbow decals on the church doors, explaining they symbolize that all people are welcome, with a special welcome to those who identify as LGBTQ+. Another speaker identifies as a queer woman, meaning she is attracted to other women. The rainbows around the church are a symbol of love, indicating to LGBTQ+ individuals that they are welcome and wanted as part of the church family. The church already has LGBTQ+ members.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah, Micah. It meant that there was dry land that this that the dove could find the olive leaf. That was a symbol that God used. And that we continue to use today at our church. What other symbol from the Noah's Ark story can you remember?
There's another symbol in that story. A rainbow. Yes, Carter. A rainbow. Look, we've got some rain.
Look, rainbows. I have a rainbow bracelet today. A rainbow. Do you know that rainbows are another kind of symbol beyond what god intended the rainbow to mean? Jerrian.
It is a symbol for LGBTQ plus people. That is right. And they're beautiful. I agree. I agree.
I'm going to show you. There are doors with rainbow decals in each one of those pictures. Whose doors are those? The church. They are the churches.
All of the doors to the outside, we have those rainbow decals on our doors and that is a symbol to people who come to our church that all people are welcome here. They're a symbol so that everyone can see but there is a special it's a special welcome to a group of people which we have already named and those are people who call themselves LGBTQ plus, right? They might call themselves other kinds of things too. Katie, what do you call yourself?
Speaker 1: Well, I call myself the same word that I just talked about a little bit up there. I identify as a queer woman, which means that I'm attracted to other women, and not men.
Speaker 0: Okay. So Katie identifies as queer. When people see those rainbows on the doors, it is a symbol to them that they are really welcome in this church. Oh. Lots of I would also like to say we do have people here, part of our church family who are LGBTQ plus.
We do already. So when those people, see the rainbows around our church, that means that we that that it's a symbol of our love to them that we want them here to be part of our church family too.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Somebody just threw a diIdo on the court during a WNBA game.. 😭😭😭 https://t.co/PzPBmoYUor
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hayes' shot was blocked by Maya Caldwell, and something flew onto the court from the crowd. Officials allowed play to continue, but noted the incident needs to be addressed. The object, described as green, bounced on the sideline and is believed to be under a seat. The announcers expressed shock that play continued with the object on the court. They stated they do not know why the object was thrown, but believe the person responsible should be removed from the arena. They emphasized there is no room for such behavior and the most important thing is keeping the players safe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And eight assists to add.
Speaker 1: Hayes gets blocked by Maya Caldwell. Something flies on the court actually from the crowd. The officials will say they will continue play as that goes off the fingertips of the Valkyries, but that needs to be addressed.
Speaker 0: Well, let's go back to the block, though. Hayes thinks she has the clean shot, and Maya Caldwell just comes over and saves the possession. Excellent defense in Caldwell, and that's her job that normally Jordan Canada didn't know something flew on the court. She's being told right now. That is a first, and the object is still down on the floor on the opposite side of the court.
There something green that was
Speaker 1: So for the Valkyries to actually play through that, I I was shocked that that wasn't picked up earlier, but they played through it. And
Speaker 0: you can see the object, the block right there, and the object comes. That green thing bounces, and it goes to the sideline. We're not exactly where it we're not sure where it came from, but to my knowledge, it's still underneath the seat. I'm looking right at it. Why it would have been launched?
I do not know, but they gotta get that person up out of here now. And security is on the way. Don't play that.
Speaker 1: That there is no room for that ever. And the most important thing when you come to see your favorite W players take the floor is keeping them safe. And there is just absolutely no room for any of
Speaker 0: that type of activity. Yeah. And no one's
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
LMAOO.. the BBC went into a Muslim majority area in the UK, to prove they’re integrating The FIRST person responds with, “I don’t understand English” 😭😭 https://t.co/9SeKg89GLy
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Police officer in Scottsdale kneels in support of anti-ICE protesters Yikes. https://t.co/lQmc3HWAjG
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Antifa chants “Fck you pigs”, as cops save a Christian mother and child from their crowd.. 👀 https://t.co/7ucsuGcjen
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
This man is absolutely COOKING.. People are waking up.. 🔥🔥 https://t.co/QrhPpjeA1v
Video Transcript AI Summary
A man who can show where my money is going and prove it's not going to the right places is not my enemy; he's trying to help me. Stop making it about race; it's them against all of us.
They will lock you up if you don't file your taxes. They're saying you have to give them your money so they can buy things like condoms and coffee cups for their employees. If you don't, they'll lock you up. Why isn't anybody living? I know I'm not the only one actually living.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Shit. I don't know about y'all. Any man out here that can sit down with me and tell me where the fuck my money is going, and I know and he he can show me that my money is not going in the right places. It's not my fucking enemy, bro. He is not my enemy.
He's trying to put me on game. You feel me? Stop talking about race. It's not a race thing. It's them motherfuckers against all us.
People, they are taking they will lock you up if you don't file your fucking taxes. Basically, they're saying, you're gonna give us your fucking money, motherfucker, and we gotta go buy condoms. We gotta go get some coffee goddamn cups for our employees who's at home. And if you don't give us our money, we're gonna lock you up, motherfucker. Why ain't people living?
Why ain't nobody living? I'm the only I know I ain't the only one. Walk around this motherfucker living.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
The amount of FRAUD that DOGE has uncovered is insane.. Here’s the whole Jesse watters interview.. 🔥🔥 https://t.co/VTwCKmLzPQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Doge, led by Elon Musk, investigates government waste and fraud. The team found the Treasury lacked budget codes for $5 trillion in payments, and a $4 billion COVID fund was misused for parties at Caesar's Palace and stadium rentals. The Department of Education now requires receipts for fund withdrawals, but these are not verified. The Small Business Administration gave $330 million in loans to dead people and $660 million to babies or people with future birthdates.
The Inter-American Foundation (IAF) spends only 58% of its funds on grantees, such as alpaca farming in Peru, with the rest going to management and travel. Only 10-15 cents of each dollar reaches the intended recipient due to layers of subcontractors.
The United States Institute of Peace was found to have loaded guns, spent money on private jets, and had a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban. The agency's chief accountant deleted over a terabyte of accounting records, and unspent funds were moved to a private bank account.
The government stores retirement papers in a mine, a process taking six months and involving manual calculations. The Postal Service is losing billions annually due to regulations since 2007. "Big Balls" is working on payment computer systems to root out fraud, as most systems lack payment accountability. Doge members have faced threats and hostility for their work.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our exclusive look into Doge. Elon Musk was nice enough to invite us into the Eisenhower Building last night to sit in on his weekly 10PM Doge meeting. Yeah, they usually meet at 10:00. I'm almost in bed by then. We met the whole crew, even big balls, and they showed us how Doge really gets done.
We sat back, listened, and we learned a lot, and we hope you do too. Here's part one of our exclusive interview. Elon, thank you so much for bringing us to the meeting here. I'm gonna do something no anchor ever does. I'm not gonna talk.
What? As long as I'm gonna you run your and then I'll interrupt when I'm bored. So take it away.
Speaker 1: So like a board meeting. Like a board
Speaker 2: meeting. Exactly.
Speaker 1: Alright. Well, I guess we normally go around the table, say what what do we get done this week? Wait. This way? Sure.
No. We start with you. Sure.
Speaker 3: So actually, lot of great work at the treasury this week. One of the crazy things at with regards to the treasury is that when a payment is made and the computers of the treasury actually pay about $5,000,000,000,000 per year, like crazy amounts, there was formerly not a budget code on there. So if some payment was made, you didn't know actually what it was for. It could have been for anything.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: There was a a $4,000,000,000 COVID fund in the Department of Education and there was no receipts required so people could just draw down on it. And when people looked into it, this wasn't just before us, they found that money was being used to rent out Caesars Palace for parties, out stadiums, etc. And so the one change that Doge made with Department of Education is we had the simple requirement that if you draw down money you must first upload a receipt. That was the only change that was made. You must upload your And upon doing so, nobody drew down any money anymore.
Speaker 1: Yes, but we didn't say that we'd check the receipt. You could send a fake receipt. You could send a picture of your dog. Anything. Anything.
Anything. And and they but as soon as we asked for anything at all, they suddenly the requests were like, oh, we don't need it anymore. That's interesting.
Speaker 0: They were renting Caesar's Palace.
Speaker 1: Yes. They were like basically partying of a tax share of money.
Speaker 0: Stadiums. Yes. Leasing stadiums. Leasing stadiums. For what?
Speaker 1: For parties, basically.
Speaker 2: For parties?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: That's a big party.
Speaker 1: It's a big party. You'd think if you were stealing, you'd start small. They do start small. But then what happens is over the years so generally the fraud starts out small and they try to hide it. But then year after year, if nobody stops the fraud, it gets more and more brazen.
And and every year it gets bigger until they're literally renting out stadiums. I like in
Speaker 0: I mean the million dollars to rent out a stadium?
Speaker 1: Fraud infra infragrante delecto. Okay? We're talking at scale.
Speaker 0: This is driving me crazy.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: When you find these things, do you guys get mad? You're like, yes. I got one. How does it how does it make you feel?
Speaker 4: It's so common.
Speaker 1: It's so common.
Speaker 2: You know? I mean,
Speaker 1: you just get numb to it. Like, you get like, the like, hundredth time you've heard it, you it's hard not to get a little numb. Yeah. You know? But, like and by the two hundredth time, you're like, well, okay.
It's just another day at the office.
Speaker 5: We checked, is the small business administration giving loans to dead people, people over the age of 20? The answer was yes, and it was around $330,000,000 in total.
Speaker 1: So people with a birthday that could not possibly be real. Yeah. Meaning, they're they're over a hundred they're 15 years old or older. The oldest living American is 14. So it's safe to say if anybody is in the system as 115 years or older, that is fake.
Speaker 6: So just by sharing a database and looking at social security numbers that showed that at the time of the loan, they had listed as over 15 years old or actually 11. We didn't even check for 18. Babies and 11 years old.
Speaker 7: That's pretty clear. Babies and dead
Speaker 1: people who were getting loans.
Speaker 6: That was $660,000,000.
Speaker 1: And also people with birth dates in the future.
Speaker 0: What does that mean?
Speaker 1: Well, in one case, I mean, I think the birth date, I think in one
Speaker 0: case was like Fetuses were getting loans.
Speaker 1: No, not even. No, really sort of like, You're talking about like your great grandchildren. Like with the birth date, like, I think it was like 02/1965. So more than a century from now was the birth date.
Speaker 0: George Jetson was getting paid.
Speaker 1: Yes. Because your birthday is in the future, like the far like the far future, not like next year. Right. And we either this is either fraudulent or we have your birthday wrong.
Speaker 0: It's either a typo or someone stealing.
Speaker 1: Which is it? Yeah.
Speaker 2: Right. Yes.
Speaker 1: You should at least ask which isn't.
Speaker 0: Do you guys feel you're getting justice and accountability?
Speaker 8: One of the, I think, extreme examples of non accountability in some cases is has occurred at some of the
Speaker 2: small agencies. I
Speaker 8: think the Inter American Foundation, IAF, is one of the agencies we visited where, you know, they get $50,000,000 a year congressional money to give grants. These are things like, you know, alpaca farming in Peru, improving them
Speaker 1: That's not that's a real example.
Speaker 8: That's a real description. Improving the marketability of peas in Guatemala. Really? Through jam. And yes.
What?
Speaker 7: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2: And so
Speaker 8: you might expect, you know, in the private sector, a nonprofit to give, you know, 80 to 90% of their money to grantees. In the case of IAF, that was 58%. So the other half goes towards management
Speaker 6: Oh, yeah. Travel.
Speaker 1: What would it find exactly, Domingue, as an example is is that even if you agreed with up with supporting alpaca farmers in Peru, Well, actually most of the money never made it out of DC. Mhmm. It's going into the pockets of people in the neighborhood.
Speaker 0: What percentage And then
Speaker 1: get to Peru.
Speaker 0: Right. So what percentage do you think doesn't even get to the destination it's supposed to?
Speaker 1: I believe the GAO estimates, this is not our estimate. I believe it was on the order of only 10 to 15¢ and the dollar actually gets to the end recipient. Whether you agree with that cause or not.
Speaker 0: So they're just stealing the money before it even gets anywhere.
Speaker 1: There's layers of stealing. So there's like, there's the first layer of stealing, second layer of stealing, third layer of
Speaker 0: stealing. Subcontractor, subcontractor.
Speaker 1: Contractor, subcontractor, subcontractor. It's like peeling an onion. And then maybe and sometimes it's zero. Just flat you you get to the bottom of the onion. There's nothing there.
Speaker 0: So maybe no one got a sex change in Guatemala.
Speaker 1: It's possible no one got a sex change in Guatemala.
Speaker 4: I overheard a contractor tell one of her colleagues to falsify billable hours by creating a PowerPoint to mask a delay in the onboarding process in front of me. And this is like hour zero at this agency. And so, I mean, this is just a common theme that you take a look at these contracts, you take a look at these grants, and it's veiled in noble rhetoric. You know, it's at the top level. It's like
Speaker 1: Sounds good.
Speaker 4: Yeah. It sounds amazing. And then you actually just follow what is the what are the funds actually doing?
Speaker 1: Well, send us a picture. Exactly. And The the send us a picture request is incredibly good. Like, Pixar didn't happen. And then, like and they're, like and and it wouldn't be that hard to just frankly, they could search for for some fake pics on the Internet or get AI to generate the pics, but they don't even bother doing that.
So you
Speaker 0: you caught them cold billing fraud.
Speaker 4: Oh, I caught them her advising her colleague to do this because it takes a few days to onboard. So that is being investigated right now.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, generally, like these programs, these grants are gonna be like along the lines of save the baby pandas. And it's like, well, of course, who wouldn't wanna save the baby pandas? And, you know, in some cases they've got a show panda, which they will try it out for special occasions. In a lot of cases, they don't even have a show panda.
No panda. There's not even one panda. Because we asked for pictures and we don't even get one panda. And he's like, well, you gotta well, that's a lot. You know, what's a billion dollars get you?
Does not even get you one panda?
Speaker 0: You really wanna see a baby panda?
Speaker 1: Yeah. That will like, you know, like the Ebola money. We're like, okay. Well, we agree with, like, we shouldn't have Ebola, you know. Where is the money going?
Oh, it's going to Deloitte in DC. Like, what what is an accounting firm doing with Ebola money?
Speaker 0: What has been the biggest resistance? Is there one agency? Is there one department that when you guys walk in, they all start fighting you, start hiding I
Speaker 1: thought you weren't gonna talk.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: But I guess you can answer that question. Sure. I mean, let's yes. We've we've certainly had some battles. Battles?
Yeah. Yeah. I mean, we should talk about you, sir.
Speaker 3: Oh, me. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 2: Yep. So, Jessica, there's there's me. It's a small agency called the United States Institute of Peace. It's definitely the agency we had the most fight at. We actually went into the agency and found that they had loaded guns inside of their headquarters.
It's a two for peace.
Speaker 1: I mean, given company any given organizational name is gonna be it kinda be the opposite of the title. Right.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. And so it was the by far the least peaceful agency that we've worked with Yeah. Ironically.
Speaker 1: Of
Speaker 2: course. Additionally, we found that they were spending money on things like private jets, and they even had a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban. This is this is real. We don't encounter that at most agencies.
Speaker 0: Yeah. What was the money going to the Taliban for?
Speaker 2: So it was a contractor. They received a hundred and $30,000 for generic services. And to Elon's point, there was not actually a clear description of what the contractor services were for. Was it for opium? Unclear.
Speaker 0: Or weapons?
Speaker 2: Or nothing. Or or nothing.
Speaker 0: Or abroad.
Speaker 1: Or, yeah, nothing. And and
Speaker 2: you naturally have to ask the question, how did we get here? Like, when the country was founded, there were only four agencies. Today, there are over 400. So there's been a 100x increase in the number of agencies since the founding of the nation and thanks to president Trump he's now signed two executive orders to start to reduce the number of agencies in the government and the institute of peace was one of them which is why our team went in to try and understand what was going on And that's when we found all of the craziness like the weapons in their armory, we found the payments to the Taliban. Okay.
Speaker 3: The the
Speaker 0: accountants here.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. So just try to hide
Speaker 2: the evidence. Right. So just a few hours after we got into their headquarters, we found that their chief accountant had actually deleted over a terabyte of accounting records from several years. So you'd have to ask the question, well, why would somebody do that? And the Doge team fortunately was able to recover that data with the help of a few great employees at the Institute of Peace.
And I think the most troubling thing was they received $55,000,000 a year from congress and any money that went unspent instead of returning that to congress, they would sweep it into a private bank account which had no congressional oversight and that's what they would use to fund things like events at their headquarters and private jets. And so I think it's a great example because most most Americans don't know what's going on at a lot of these smaller agencies and this is a I think the most extreme case of some of the wasteful spend that we're finding.
Speaker 0: So the agencies are hiding money from you. They're sending it to the Taliban. They have loaded weapons in the department buildings.
Speaker 2: At the Institute of Peace.
Speaker 0: At the Institute of Peace. Yes.
Speaker 2: That's
Speaker 0: right. So this is a cover up when you guys roll in?
Speaker 1: This one, yes, a cover up.
Speaker 9: It's a cover They
Speaker 1: did delete a vast amount of financial information. That's really a definition of a cover up.
Speaker 0: Isn't that illegal to delete evidence? Yes. Shred documents?
Speaker 2: It is. It's it's certainly illegal to delete accounting records that the that congress would certainly want to know where where the congressionally appropriate funds are going from from taxpayers.
Speaker 0: When you catch them going Hillary style on their computers, do you refer this to the Department of Justice?
Speaker 2: In this case, did refer the evidence in the accounting example to the FBI and DOJ. We were proud to do that. So, yes, we did.
Speaker 5: Resistance has shown up in some very surprising places. So for example, the famous fork in the road email, the deferred resignation program. So this was a program where you could resign from the government, collect pay and benefits for the next eight months. Probably the most attractive separation program ever in human history. And the resistance actually came from the outside with people saying this is a trick, and I've heard somebody refer to it as an apple with a razor blade.
And, no, this was just a really juicy apple, caramel dipped apple. It it it was that good, but people were talked out of out of taking it. And now what started to happen is we did have about 80,000 people take it, and now those folks who did take it are on the beach or they've moved on to a new job, and they're still getting paid. And so now we're starting to offer fork two and fork three, where people can see that someone's eaten this apple, and it was actually really tasty and good for them.
Speaker 0: Is Doge just getting started? Is this is a long term enterprise.
Speaker 1: It's a long term enterprise because if if we take our eye off the ball, the waste and fraud will come roaring back.
Speaker 0: They can doge doge when Democrats get back in power.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Well, I think some of the things that like, we're trying to have it be such that the the funding is is removed, so the grants are gone. So this it that if there's a lot of work required to restart the waste of fraud. And and that that will at least slow it down.
Speaker 0: Elon Musk shows primetime the cave, the money faucet, and the stone age phones. Right back. We're back. Part two. The exclusive interview with Elon Musk and the Doge Boys.
They took us inside the caves of bureaucracy. Watch this. We heard about a cave. We had federal workers working in a cave.
Speaker 1: I That's me. Yeah. They still Joe's actually been to the cave. Do do you wanna tell tell us about your your cave your cave your cave cave?
Speaker 2: I went I went mining
Speaker 0: a Spelunking?
Speaker 1: You're you're spelunking.
Speaker 10: So I've been helping out
Speaker 1: with with retirement.
Speaker 10: Been helping out with retirement. And a few weeks ago I had chance to go to the mine. And so I took a golf cart through security down into the side of a mountain and entered daylight left and I entered this whole space of caverns and roads and we get to a metal door and I open it up and there in front of me is is a sea of filing cabinets from the nineteen sixties. And I'm walking around, it's super chilly, smells like paper.
Speaker 1: And
Speaker 10: I, you know, I realized for for as a mind, it's great mind. It's secure. It's well lit, temperature controlled. And so the question we're not ask we're asking is not is this a good place to store physical media, which it is. It's amazing for that.
The question is, why are we still using paper in 2025? So I brought something to show you Yeah. Of what's inside the mind.
Speaker 1: And and and only the the normal process for retirement is over it'll be over six months. So once you file your retirement papers, that's why it takes six months.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. What what is that?
Speaker 10: So these are replica case folders that people use to retire from the government. And so these are all compiled by hand and moved around on carts through the mind. It takes many months to do that, and this one is a single retiree's paper required to leave the government.
Speaker 1: If somebody wants to retire, they can't because it takes six months to compile the paper and carry the paper into a mine where it is stored. And and also, all the calculations are done by hand.
Speaker 0: Everything has to
Speaker 1: be replaced by
Speaker 10: Reconciled, adjudicated. This is thicker than the Word of the Rings trilogy. Yeah. And if I had to process this, I would rather do my taxes in the dark than have to go
Speaker 1: through this. Yeah.
Speaker 10: And so what we're doing is we're we're bringing this process online with modern software. And I'm excited to share that as of tonight, we have 25 retirees going through an entirely online retirement process in the government for the first time.
Speaker 0: It sounds so simple. Yes.
Speaker 10: And and it's great collaboration with retirement services inside OPM. So this has always been their dream, we're just here to help accelerate it.
Speaker 0: That's a pretty fat stack. Was that Kissinger's?
Speaker 1: Oh, no. This the record is almost I mean, several shopping carts.
Speaker 10: For there's a whole pallet for one retiree That's a with 27 boxes of paper on it.
Speaker 0: For one guy.
Speaker 1: That's the record.
Speaker 10: I've seen it with my own eyes.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, it's certainly and and it also frees up people because we we shouldn't have over a thousand people carrying paper into a mine. That that is not a good use of human of people's lives. So there are many other things that they could do that would be far more productive than carrying paper into the light.
Speaker 0: If you were to say, we have iPhones, did does the government have payphones? Like, prehistoric is this technology?
Speaker 1: Oh, yes. It's it's it's very sorry. It's very prehistoric. It's like Flintstones.
Speaker 0: It's Flintstone level stuff.
Speaker 1: It's it's so prehistoric. Like dinosaurs would think this is, you know, kinda old. Okay. That's how prehistoric it is. Okay.
So we're I mean, basically, the only thing loving was a sponge when that's how prehistoric it was.
Speaker 0: Okay. So we're leaving the stone age, and we're moving into the golden age.
Speaker 1: The pre Cambrian era is what we're talking about. Okay.
Speaker 0: There was a story I heard about mules. There were mules delivering mail to the bottom of the Grand Canyon.
Speaker 1: Which might not might not be a bad thing, actually. You have the mule picture.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Pics or it doesn't exist.
Speaker 1: Right? Yeah. Yeah. But this and this this is a case where actually it might not I think do we agree with the mule or or should should there be mules?
Speaker 11: I think it can be modernized.
Speaker 1: If there's opportunity for improvement. Yes. Right. Okay.
Speaker 11: Right. So, yeah, I'm at the postal service. I I think a lot of people don't realize that there's actually a law that says that the post office is supposed to, like, have a balanced budget.
Speaker 1: There is?
Speaker 11: Yeah. There is.
Speaker 1: I didn't know that.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Right.
Speaker 1: Well, that's not working, is it? No. It's not. So So they're breaking the law?
Speaker 11: They're breaking the law. Okay. Basically, since 02/2007, almost every year since 02/2007, they've they've lost money. So you might ask, like, what happened in 02/2007?
Speaker 1: So there was there was additional What happened in 02/2007?
Speaker 11: Yeah. There was additional regulation Okay. That went into place that essentially crippled them and put them down this, like, not good path where they essentially are stuck in the past as well as bleeding money left and right. Okay. So, like, it's great, and and we appreciate that the Postal employees are are willing to go to the hardest parts, like, in this country, but we think that we can we can modernize it and and help them become profitable.
Speaker 1: How many people have lives in the same?
Speaker 11: Right now, last year, they lost 9 and a half billion dollars.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: Yep. Serious money.
Speaker 0: We finally meet Big Balls. Up next. Part three. Here's the interview with Elon Musk and the rest of the Doge crew. We finally ask the one question on our mind.
Who's Big Balls?
Speaker 1: It's me. That should be obvious. Why
Speaker 0: do they call you Big Balls?
Speaker 7: I just said it as my LinkedIn username. Okay. Well, people on LinkedIn take themselves, like, super seriously, and they're pretty adverse to risk. And I was like, well, I wanna be neither of those things. So I just I said it, and then, honestly, I didn't even think anyone would notice.
Speaker 1: Yeah. When you clicking this so cringe.
Speaker 0: What does Big Balls do?
Speaker 7: Right now, I'm working on some payment computer stuff. So one of our initiatives is to root out fraud and waste. And to do that, we started looking at the payment computers. And as mentioned earlier, like, there is no accounting of what payments actually go to in the payment computer. So, like, you look at a specific line item, like $20,000,000, and you're like, okay.
Well, what is this money going to? And for the majority of payment systems, it's like, well, we don't really know.
Speaker 1: And They're like, what? That would be the response.
Speaker 0: Is this the most basic responses?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. That's the most common response.
Speaker 0: What do you say when people just say, I don't know.
Speaker 7: Well, it's a huge cause for concern because, like, the upstream thing, is distributing the money, literally has no checks and no no accountability to the actual American taxpayer. So it's a huge vector for fraud, waste, and abuse.
Speaker 0: Do these people not respect taxpayer money?
Speaker 7: I mean, there's no incentive to you if you work in the government. I think the incentives will always decide the outcomes.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Do you guys feel like you're putting yourself at risk by doing this because you're stirring up so much hostility by these people ripping us off?
Speaker 1: A %. Well, we don't need to speculate about that. You can see online in in the protests that they make that very clear. I mean, I've been hanged in effigy many times, and there have been people that have actively advocated at these violent protests violent protests for my death, and who also advocated for the death of the the people at Doge.
Speaker 8: I think the young folks of us have gotten female threats from reporters and the public alike. I think speaking for myself I dropped out of Harvard and came here to serve my country and it's been unfortunate to see you know lost friendships, most of campus hates me now, but I think fundamentally I hope people realize through conversations like this that reform is genuinely needed and if there's one I think this is important to say if there's one group of people who really have a shot success it's the people here you know they're up until 2AM Monday through Sunday, those should not recognize weekends we're working all
Speaker 1: the time.
Speaker 0: Inspired you to drop out of Harvard to do this?
Speaker 8: You know there's a lot of, reform that's needed, I think the value of this and the impact here is so much more vast than anything you could learn in a classroom doing computer science.
Speaker 0: And you guys are sleeping here. I'm hearing you guys are up all night. You have this meeting at 10:00 every Wednesday.
Speaker 8: We'll probably, go back to work
Speaker 2: right after this. Yeah.
Speaker 0: You're going back to work after this.
Speaker 2: Yes. Right.
Speaker 0: It's almost 11:00. So that's early.
Speaker 8: That's early.
Speaker 0: It's early? Can I go to bed? That's an incredible work ethic. You guys should be really, really proud of yourself. Do good people come up to you and say thank you for doing what you're doing?
Speaker 9: Absolutely. There are people in the state department that will stop you or all of the agencies that we've been to that'll stop you in the hallways or write emails and say, was scared to write this or I don't know if you're interested in this, but they usually have great ideas. And if they often have the best ideas because they've worked in the places and they've been stifled by the bureaucracy for so many years. So one of the the great things that at least in my that I, you know, we listen to them and empower them.
Speaker 1: Yes, in fact, I'd like to emphasize that because we'd like to just give a big thank you to all the government employees who are helping reduce the waste and fraud because this is, you know, we really couldn't do it without you. So
Speaker 0: it's a group effort.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. So it's I'm not trying to sort of say all government employees are bad. That's absolutely not the case.
It's just that, you know, there actually just does need to be a serious effort to reduce the waste waste and forward and we're just making that happen and a lot of people in the government are very glad to see it happen.
Speaker 6: I think it's really important to recognize every single person around this table that's embedded within an agency is supporting that agency whether they're working on systems or working through people. We are encountering droves of government employees who are missionaries not mercenaries who are actually here serving because they believe in what they're doing they want to do things well. We are trying to empower them and they feel empowered now to ask the question of why, why aren't we doing this, what else can we be doing, how can we fix this and I think agency by agency it is filled with exceptional government employees right and we when we give them the tools, when we give them the systems and we leave behind systems to help them do their jobs better that's the permanent change right and they're embracing that not because it's new to them it's because it's something they've always wanted to do but for the first time ever we're giving them the tools and the collaboration to be able to do that.
Speaker 0: It's a very important message. That message needs to get out a lot more I'm so glad you said that.
Speaker 6: We have exceptional people at all of our agencies, exceptional. I mean they do a thankless job and they work incredibly hard.
Speaker 0: I love to hear how collaborative it is with these people in these agencies and it's not all conflict. Sometimes in the media, always hear about conflict and you guys are considered these ruthless suits that come in and scare people, but
Speaker 6: it's Conflict is the exception.
Speaker 1: Is conflict, but that is the exception. It's actually true of history in general. You know, there's people study the wars a lot, but actually most of the time there wasn't war.
Speaker 0: It's just not as exciting.
Speaker 1: It's just not as exciting. Right. Exactly.
Speaker 0: Well, the TV guys, we like conflict, but in this case, we love the collaboration. So thank you guys. Thanks for allowing me this access in here. You guys are just really, really bright, young, smart patriots. And you have a great team.
And thank you, Elon, for everything you've done for the country. We really appreciate it. We're eternally grateful.
Speaker 1: You're welcome. Thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
And just like that ANOTHER Trump supporter is born.. 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/5si3jUqVUg
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they used to believe Republicans were intolerant, racist, and closed-minded. However, their experience in 2016 showed them the opposite. While working in an office with mostly Republican colleagues, they openly supported Hillary Clinton without facing any negative treatment. The speaker contrasts this with their experience after disagreeing with the Democratic party. According to the speaker, Democrats, despite preaching tolerance and acceptance, exhibited intolerance towards them for changing their political views. The speaker concludes that the hatred they associate with the other side is actually present within the Democratic party.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I've also learned one thing about Donald Trump supporters and Republicans in general. See, it used to be I thought they were intolerant. I thought they were the ones who were racist and closed minded. But it turns out it was the other way around. Because when I was in 2016 voting for Hillary Clinton, I was working in a small office then.
The majority of the people I was working with were republican. They had no problem with me saying that I was supporting Hillary Clinton. Not one of those people treated me any differently because I thought differently than them. But the minute you turn away from that, I don't agree with what the Democratic party is doing anymore. I don't stand for that anymore.
The minute you do that, the Democrats have a problem with it. But they're the ones preaching tolerance. They're the ones preaching acceptance. They're the ones talking about the hatred on the other side when really the hatred is on their side.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
WOW.. this woman’s parents should be ARRESTED.. https://t.co/Iq9UFgRpNZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Clementine, a detransitioner, shares her experience with another person also named Clementine. She began puberty blockers at 12, testosterone at 13, and had a double mastectomy at 14. Testosterone caused her to experience psychosis, so she stopped taking it around age 17. Now 20, she detransitioned earlier this year and is undergoing reconstructive surgery. She notes that getting approval for reconstructive surgery has been more difficult than getting the initial double mastectomy. She expresses disbelief that people question the experiences of detransitioners.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Come on in. Yeah. Yeah. My name is Clementine.
Speaker 1: I'm actually
Speaker 0: What's your name?
Speaker 1: My name is Clementine.
Speaker 0: Nice to meet you.
Speaker 1: I've actually seen your stuff online, and I'm a huge fan. I was on puberty blockers. I started when I was 12, and I've been on I was on testosterone from 14 to 17 and I got top surgery at 17. Totally messed my life up. So I just wanna say you're doing a good thing.
Wow. I can't believe people disagree with you on this. As a former, like, child transitioner, I'm just, like, appalled that people have anything to question you about. So
Speaker 0: I still do. I'm so sorry you had to go through all that. I'm glad you are through it now. Thank you so much for speaking up. That's extremely valuable because a lot of people are to.
Yeah. So do you mind if we have a little conversation about it?
Speaker 1: Of course. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Okay. Come on in this way just a little bit.
Speaker 1: Oh, For sure. Hi.
Speaker 0: So your name again? My name is Clementine. Clementine. So Clementine went on puberty blockers at what age? 12.
And you detransitioned dad?
Speaker 1: I detransitioned earlier this year, actually, but I had been going off testosterone since about 17 because it gave me psychosis.
Speaker 0: When did they put you on testosterone?
Speaker 1: I was 13. Wow.
Speaker 0: And when did you have a double mastectomy?
Speaker 1: I had a double mastectomy at 14. I'm currently going through the process of getting reconstructive surgery and it was harder to get that approved. Actually, wasn't able to get it approved by my insurance.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: But it was much harder to get surgery for that than it was to actually get the original top surgery procedure.
Speaker 0: For everyone watching this who says this isn't happening, well, it happened to Clementine. At 14, a double mastectomy, puberty blockers at 12, testosterone at 13. How old are you now?
Speaker 1: I'm 20 now. I just turned 20.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Woke liberal says that MAGA needs to “shut the fck up” with supporting Donald Trump and Elon Musk.. Only 4 months in.. 😅 https://t.co/5cuBK4bC1m
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses extreme indifference to commenters, stating they do not care what commenters say. They repeat the phrase "Shut the fuck up" multiple times, suggesting commenters should be silent. The speaker offers to simplify their message for better understanding, then reiterates "Shut the fuck up."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And you bitches be in my comments like I give a fuck. Like I give a fuck. Time with a Trump. We love mess. Shut the fuck up.
Shut the fuck up. Do you know what I'm saying? Do you need me to bring it down to your level? Here, let me give it to you like this. Shut the fuck up.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Just watched this without sound and it’s even better
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Charlie Kirk always bringing the FACTS.. 🔥🔥 https://t.co/s4WilSh1bs
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 claims Black Americans are the wealthiest black people globally and believes victimhood is a hindrance, asserting nothing holds black people back and they benefit from advantages like lower college test score requirements and freedom of speech. Speaker 1 objects to the "victim mentality" claim. Speaker 1 states that people say the n-word to them frequently. Speaker 0 expresses disbelief and accuses Speaker 1 of a "race hoax" akin to Jussie Smollett, suggesting the alleged incident is fabricated to portray white students as racist. Speaker 0 asks if a black person said the n-word. Speaker 1 does not answer the question. Speaker 0 argues that if the n-word wasn't used as an insult, it shouldn't be presented as evidence of racism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know black Americans are the richest black people on earth? Where's what's the Africa.
Speaker 1: At? Can okay. I need you to pull that up, like,
Speaker 0: right now. You can. Black Americans on
Speaker 1: No. Can
Speaker 0: capita on average.
Speaker 1: Can you pull that up?
Speaker 0: I mean, mean, I'm assuming I'm hosting an event right now. I don't know what to tell you.
Speaker 1: But Well,
Speaker 0: I'm can participate. Anyone can fact check me on this. So you cannot find a a black majority country or any country where black people have significant representation where they are as wealthy. Because even the poorest people in America are in the top 5%, the top 2% of wealth around the world. And so my whole belief is stop acting like you're a victim and start making better choices.
Speaker 1: Acting like a victim. Woah. Respect. Not it's this is not a victim mentality.
Speaker 0: No. It it it fundamentally is because white people are not out to get you. There's nothing
Speaker 1: saying they
Speaker 0: there is nothing holding black people back. There is let me say that again. There is nothing holding black people back. In fact, the opposite. You can get into colleges with lower test scores, but you could say things that white people can't say and not be fired for it.
Black people are wildly disrepresentation. People say
Speaker 1: that to me all the time, and they just walk around like it doesn't mean anything around here.
Speaker 0: Say what? Say the what?
Speaker 1: The n word. I'm not gonna say it on in this public platform, but people say it to me all the time.
Speaker 0: It derogatorily. Yes. No. I think you're lying.
Speaker 1: I why would I be lying around?
Speaker 0: So you're trying to tell me at this campus, did you report it to student services?
Speaker 1: I'm not I I have too much on my plate to
Speaker 0: worry about this. So it's a oh. So so you're gonna say at this campus, you're gonna indict the moral character of Texas A and M. I'm not inditing the moral character
Speaker 1: A I'm not
Speaker 0: person or a few people. Now it's one. So you heard it all the time, and now it's one. Got it.
Speaker 1: So It's not okay.
Speaker 0: You're No. Wait. This is the point. It's that I don't believe you because now you resort back to a race hoax to make it seem as if the white kids on this campus are, like, racist and terrible. Kids.
Oh, so it was was it a black guy that said it to you?
Speaker 1: They're I'm not what
Speaker 0: It matters a lot because this is how lies are able to grow. Jussie Smollett, we see this. You have to challenge the man up.
Speaker 1: Do you think I'm lying when I I say that people say the n word around you and
Speaker 0: just If I think a white person comes up to you derogatorily and says, shut up n word, I absolutely saying they said it. I asked. I said, are they saying it derogatorily?
Speaker 1: But that doesn't mean it's word for word like that.
Speaker 0: But okay. So then it's not an insult then. So then don't bring it up as if it's evidence of racism.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
HOLY SHLIT, Liberals said that the country is a disaster, but couldn’t list ANY examples why.. 🤣🤣 https://t.co/FsRgERS9WW
Video Transcript AI Summary
An attendee at a Bernie Sanders rally expressed disgust with the current state of the country. When asked about the biggest risk, the attendee deferred to someone else. Another person expressed dislike for the language being spoken in the country but couldn't provide specific examples immediately. When asked what had changed since the start of the Biden administration, both individuals struggled to identify specific issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you out here today to the Bernie Sanders rally?
Speaker 1: I don't like what's going on in our country right now. I'm just kind of disgusted by it.
Speaker 0: What's the biggest risk?
Speaker 1: Oh, gosh. What would you say to that? Well, I'll let you speak to that.
Speaker 0: I don't know. I don't really care for the, the language that's being spoken right now in the country. Can can you give any examples of specific language? Let me think about that.
Speaker 1: So many things. I don't even know where to start. I would say, oh gosh, Dan, help. This is
Speaker 0: What's changed over the last couple months, post Biden administration for you guys?
Speaker 1: Oh, gosh. Once again, where do we start? You wanna okay. You go for this one.
Speaker 0: It's a a whole list of things I can't think of right now.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Liberal white woman says that MAGA is going to deport EVERY liberal to El Salvador.. Thoughts? https://t.co/S6sOQgYGDq
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses feeling powerless while witnessing a crisis in El Salvador, drawing a parallel to learning about World War II in high school and wondering how no one intervened. They feel complicit while going about daily routines like working and buying coffee, questioning what actions individuals can take. The speaker believes people are dying in El Salvador, even if it's not explicitly stated. They express fear that inaction will lead to everyone being harmed. The speaker suggests the constitution is failing because it relied on honorable people, who are now absent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. I don't know about any of you guys, but I'm crashing out right now because right now, it's feeling a lot like when we were sitting in high school history class learning about World War two and sitting there going, oh my god. How did this happen? What did how could nobody do anything about it? And we're living it right now because people are fucking dying in El Salvador even though they won't say that they're dying in El Salvador.
And we are just watching it on our little fucking screens, and we're going to work, and we're buying $9. And we are just watching it. I'm sitting here like, oh my god. Well, what do we do? What the fuck are we supposed to be doing?
Because I feel so powerless. I'm sitting in my car in the parking lot at my job, and I just have to go to work. And I am gonna just serve people food and be like, yes. How would you like your steak cooked? Oh, would you like to die at El Salvador?
Because they're gonna end up tort us all. What are we doing? What are we doing? Our constitution means nothing because apparently, the only thing keeping it together was people with honor and decency, and now we don't have those people. What?
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Do you support sending all Liberals to El Salvador??
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Is Kathy Griffin ok..?? https://t.co/8LJQA7n6no
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they anticipate criticism for their following opinion. They claim that neither Elon Musk nor Donald Trump has ever had consensual sex with a woman, nor sex for which they didn't have to pay, either with money or gifts. The speaker concludes with "Have a great day."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, I know I'm gonna get in trouble for this one, so here goes. I can't imagine that either Elon Musk or Donald Trump has ever had sex that was consensual on the part of the woman or sex that they did not have to pay for pay money for or gifts ever. Have a great day.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
This is GOLD.. there is zero comeback from this. 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/fqLnb8qpHi
Video Transcript AI Summary
Luna, a transgender nationally registered advanced EMT in New Mexico, estimates they have responded to 1,500 calls and treated too many transgender people to count.
A second speaker poses a hypothetical scenario: if a biological male with a penis experiencing a medical emergency claimed to be having a miscarriage, would the EMT check for a miscarriage or consider it a possibility? The speaker's answer is no.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Luna, and I am a nationally registered advanced EMT here in the state of New Mexico. I am also transgender. Throughout my career as an EMT, I have responded to, by conservative estimates, about 1,500 calls for service here in the state of New Mexico. I have treated more transgender people than I can count.
Speaker 1: He says you're an EMT. Okay. If you're responding you're responding to a health emergency. Biological male. Somebody with a penis is is having a medical emergency.
And they say to you, I think I'm having a miscarriage. Would you check them to see if they're having a miscarriage? Would you consider that a possibility for them? No.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
UNHINGED liberal tried to brake check a Tesla and crashed immediately after.. 👀 https://t.co/IwwSyUNIcP
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Liberal woman has NO CLUE why she’s even boycotting Tesla.. 💀💀 https://t.co/Cxuv6mIcCc
Video Transcript AI Summary
A protestor claims boycotting Tesla takes down a leader, Elon Musk, of a movement to dismantle democracy. When asked what movement Musk is leading, the protestor declines to elaborate, suggesting the questioner do their own research. The protestor holds a sign that says, "Where is Elon Musk's marbles?" which they explain means "he's an idiot." When asked to explain why Musk is an idiot, the protestor refuses to engage further, stating that the questioner is not prepared to accept any information. They say they are present to support the movement, not to explain it. They also state that they think Musk is an idiot for sending rockets into space.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How does boycotting Tesla save democracy?
Speaker 1: It takes down a lead a leader of the movement to dismantle democracy. What movement? By Elon Musk, who happens to be Canadian, raised as well.
Speaker 0: Okay. So what's the problem with Elon Musk? What movement is he leading?
Speaker 1: Sorry. I'm not here to to date with you. Sorry. You could do research on Google.
Speaker 0: I know I did the research on Google, but you're protesting. I just wanted to ask what what movement is Elon Musk a part of that's not
Speaker 1: That's a
Speaker 0: that's not good for democracy. Can I see that sign? What does that say? Where is Elon Musk's marbles? What does that mean?
Speaker 1: I don't know.
Speaker 0: Can't you read? But it's your sign. I'm just asking. I just wanna know what it means to you.
Speaker 1: What it means is that he's an idiot. That's what it means.
Speaker 0: He's an idiot? In what way? What's he doing?
Speaker 1: You know what? I don't wanna engage with you. Sorry. If you are interested in this topic, please read up about it. It's all over the news, the Internet, all kinds of information available to you.
Speaker 0: Okay. But you guys are here with the signs, so maybe you know more about than I do.
Speaker 1: I'm not here to explain this to you. I'm here to support this movement.
Speaker 0: You're not here to explain it to anyone?
Speaker 1: Not to you in particular. No. I've explained it to you, and you refused to accept it.
Speaker 0: All you said all you said is, Elon doesn't have marbles and that he's an idiot. Do you think he's an idiot for, like, sending rockets into space and stuff?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I do. Why? Okay. Listen.
I'm not here to debate with you. You're not prepared to accept any information, so sorry.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Elon Musk can’t stop laughing after reporter claims that Tesla is “taking water from the region”… 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/PBlqiPKjkr
Video Transcript AI Summary
Critics claim Heska is stealing water from the region. One person disputes this, stating the region has abundant water, evidenced by the surrounding environment. They claim the assertion that there was no water before the government's station is completely wrong, as water is everywhere. They question whether the area resembles a desert, implying it does not due to frequent rainfall.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The question critics say that Heska stealing water from the region.
Speaker 1: This region has so much water. Look around you.
Speaker 0: But the local the site says there's no more water before the the government's station.
Speaker 1: No. No. This is completely wrong. It's like water everywhere here. Does this seem like a desert to you?
Speaker 0: Okay. Dankestrone.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's ridiculous.
Speaker 0: What do I expect?
Speaker 1: It rains a lot.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
White Dude for Harris’ Tesla got vandalized, DESPITE having anti-Elon and Ukraine flag bumper stickers.. 👀 https://t.co/ren4tmSkaB
Video Transcript AI Summary
A California driver with an electric vehicle, purchased with a tax credit to "make the world green," expresses confusion after an incident. The vehicle has bumper stickers including "This vehicle does not support fascists," "Anti Elon Tesla Club," "I got this for dog mode," and a Ukrainian flag. While driving in self-drive mode to visit a partner, someone threw something at the windshield. The driver, who states they "can't stand that Nazi scum Musk" and wants Tesla stock to fail, questions the appropriate response to the incident and asks, "Are we getting gas vehicles now? So confusing."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: California, governor Newsom, I thought you said we were all supposed to get electric vehicles. You gave us a tax credit. We're gonna make the world green. Listen. That's why I got this.
This vehicle does not support fascists. I have a bumper sticker that says that on the back along with an anti Elon Tesla Club one, one that says I got this for dog mode and a Ukrainian flag. Yet despite this, I'm going to visit my partner, Carol, to hang out. I have it in self drive mode, which is awesome. I doze off a little bit and I wake to this.
Somebody threw something at my windshield. Listen. I am on the same team as all of you. Okay? Alright?
Resist. I can't stand that Nazi scum Musk. I want the stock to fail, but what are we doing? What are we doing? Just tell me.
I'll do whatever it is. Are we getting gas vehicles now? So confusing.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Liberal man says that Donald Trump “needs to be sh0t”… ??? https://t.co/jTR4GUoZan
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
HOLY SHT Tucker Carlson interviewed Sam Bankman-Fried from prison. SBF stole $8 BILLION from FTX users and was the Democrats 2nd largest donor https://t.co/pNeVnfHzFS
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm in MDC Brooklyn, been here for about two years. It's dystopian, but the staff are mostly helpful. It's tough when 40 people are locked in a room for years, and the smallest things become everything. I haven't had physical problems, but legal access during my trial was a nightmare.
I spend my days reading, playing chess, and working on my case. The lack of meaningful activity is crushing. I’ve had time to reflect on my communication, realizing I focused too much on details and missed the big picture.
I wasn't on Adderall, but my mind was racing with a billion things to manage, I prefer having the digital world for productivity and impact. I've made some friends here, including Diddy, who's been kind, although this is a weird environment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So where where are you?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm well, I'm in MDC Brooklyn in a little side room.
Speaker 0: What's how long have you been there?
Speaker 1: I've been in prison for about oh, boy. What's it been now? It's been about two years.
Speaker 0: So what what's it like?
Speaker 1: It's I mean, it's sort of dystopian. You know, the the fortunate thing, the place I'm in, I'm not in sort of I'm not in physical danger. And, you know, frankly, a lot of the staff, they're trying to be helpful. They're trying to, you know, do what they can given the constraints. But, you know, no one wants to be in prison.
And you can imagine what happens when you take sort of 40 people, you know, all of whom have been at least charged with crimes and walk them in a single room for years unended, throw out the key, which is the the most trivial things become all that people have left to care about.
Speaker 0: Yes. Have have you had any problems?
Speaker 1: Not of the sort of acute kind. Like, I haven't had you know, I haven't been attacked or anything like that. I've had a lot of logistical problems. And, you know, the biggest, frankly, was when I was on trial, trying to get access to legal work was nearly impossible. I would, you know, on a typical trial day, they'd wake me up at 4AM.
I'd spend five hours in various buses, vans, and holding cells until my trial started in the morning. Then trial straight through to 5PM, another four hours in holding cells and vans. You know, I'd get back at 9PM way after any access to legal work was cut off for the day. So that was the biggest problem.
Speaker 0: So what do what do you do all day when you're not on trial?
Speaker 1: Well, it's a really good question because there's not a whole lot to do in prison. I read books. I've, you know, started reading novels again. I play some chess, and I work on my legal case to the extent I can. You know, there's appeal, there are other things.
I do what work I can from in here on that, but the lack of other meaningful things to spend my time on is one of the most kind of soul crushing things about prison.
Speaker 0: I gotta say we we've never talked before, but, obviously, I've I've watched you from afar. And and I I just also say I feel sorry for every man in prison no matter what he's accused of or did. I just I don't think we should be locking people away. I know I guess we have to, but I I feel sorry for everyone in prison. I'm just saying.
Call me liberal. But you you do you do seem kind of healthier and less jumpy, I have to say, after two years in prison.
Speaker 1: You know, I've had a lot of time to reflect on how to communicate. And in retrospect, you know, I was I think I was not effective at communicating, especially when the crisis first hit. And, you know, in the in the months thereafter, I made a mistake I often make. I get swept up in in details and forget to meet the bigger picture.
Speaker 0: You you seem like you were just flying high on Adderall every time I saw you on TV. You don't seem that way now, Were you?
Speaker 1: No, I wasn't. But I was my mind was freezing because there were, you know, a billion things to keep track of. You know, we serve typically I'd have and back when I running FTX, you know, I I I go on to have an interview, but, you know, while on the interview, there would be two issues I'd have to resolve with the company. So I'd have sort of one eye on Slack open, responding to messages. And I knew that I had something else I had to do right after the interview that I hadn't had time to prepare for yet that I was sort preparing for in the back of my mind.
Speaker 0: So maybe, like, the digital world is bad for us. Is that I mean, like, what's what's your view of that? You've been taken away from your phone. So that's kind of big.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Oh, it is. I I prefer having the digital world. But then, you know, at the end of the day, like, it's but but I will say that when I say that it's less from a perspective of, like, enjoyment or or or or, you know, pleasure or leisure. And it's more from a perspective of productivity and ability to have impact in the world.
You know, from that perspective, it's it's so hard to do anything. We don't have the digital world.
Speaker 0: So, like, have you made friends there? How do are you hanging with Diddy? I think he's in there with you.
Speaker 1: He is. He is. And I it's I don't know. You know, he's been kind. The I've made some friends.
It's it's a weird environment. You know? It's sort of a combination of a few other high profile cases and then a lot of, you know, ex gangsters or sort of, you know, alleged ex gangsters.
Speaker 0: Definitely alleged. So what what's Diddy like?
Speaker 1: I you know, obviously, I've I've only seen one one piece of him, which is, you know, Diddy in prison. And, you know, he's been kind to people in the unit. He's been kind to me. It's also it's it's a position no one wants to be in. You know, obviously, he doesn't I don't as you said, it's it's kind of a soul crushing place for the world in general.
And, you know, what we see are just the people that that are around us on the inside rather than
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Who we are on the outside.
Speaker 0: Oh, I'm I'm sure. And if I mean, you're two of the most famous prisoners in the world in the same unit. What what are the other what are, like, what are the armed robbers think?
Speaker 1: Well, it's a really interesting question. And if, of course, some of them are, I think, thinking like, wow, this is sort of a big opportunity, like, you know, to meet people they wouldn't otherwise get to meet, which is and shock me the first time I
Speaker 0: did that.
Speaker 1: Right? It makes sense. Their perspective, but, like, boys, I don't know how not how I think about prison. Sorry.
Speaker 0: Sorry to laugh. No.
Speaker 1: That's such
Speaker 0: a good bet it's not how you think about it. No.
Speaker 1: It's not. And laughing is all you can do sometimes. You know? There's there's no better alternative. They're good at chess.
That's one thing I learned. Like, you know, former armed robbers who don't speak English and, you know, probably didn't graduate middle school are a surprising number of them are, like, fairly good at chess. Like, you know, not I'm not saying they're grandmasters, but, like, you know, I lose games to them all the time. I was not expecting that.
Speaker 0: Wow. So how is it that's so interesting. How has that changed your your views?
Speaker 1: Well, you know, I would say it's part of a larger whole, which, you know, it's one of the most sort
Speaker 0: of
Speaker 1: profound things that I've come to learn over my life, but still something I don't fully understand, which is obviously, you know, what we call intelligence or IQ or whatever. It matters. It's important. Working hard matters. It's important.
But there are other things. Things that we don't have good words for. I still haven't found the right words for. But things that can make someone an unbelievably impressive and successful and productive person that seemed to kind of outshine what IR others would expect of them. Obviously, not everyone.
You know, everyone's in different places. But, you know, something we saw a lot at FTS, we find someone with an absolutely shit resume. I mean, just nothing to recommend themselves. No real relevant experience. And all of a sudden, we realized they were outperforming almost everyone else at the company.
Just because they had the grit, they had the instincts, they had the dedication, they knew how to work, how to interface with others, and how to see solutions to problems.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, I've known on the flip side, a number of extremely stupid people have gotten rich in finance. They're clearly have a kind of brilliance that I can't see. Yeah. They seem like morons to me.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm interested in what types there are. I I was on Wall Street in a farmer life, and there are a variety of people there.
Speaker 0: So there's been a lot of talk about changes to The US tax code, especially changes that affect cryptocurrency investing. What are those changes? Well, what if there was already a way to invest in the market with tax advantages? Well, iTrustCapital makes that possible. ITrustCapital is a software platform that lets you invest in crypto using a self directed IRA.
That means with a traditional IRA, taxes are deferred, and with a Roth IRA, you won't have to pay taxes on your crypto gains, just like a retirement account. On top of that, the crypto market never closes. You can buy or sell $24.07 in case you stay up late. ITrustCapital makes investing easy, safe, and accessible. You don't have to be an expert.
Their website has easy to understand articles, videos, and if you ever need help, you can speak with an actual person in The United States because the whole thing is based in The United States, the whole company. So if you're looking to add crypto to your retirement portfolio, sign up today at itrustcapital.com/tucker and use a promo code Tucker for a hundred dollar funding bonus. So, I mean, big picture without getting into like all the details of your case, but it it does seem like you guys made a decision at your company to form political alliances through political donations, which is not singling you out. You're hardly the only businessman who's done that. It's actually kind of par now.
But you gave so much to Democrats that I kind of thought they would rescue you in the end. Where where were all your friends in the Democratic party? They usually keep their friends from going to jail. Tony Podesta never went to jail. Why did you?
Speaker 1: Oh, it's a really good question. Obviously, I can only guess with the answer to that. I can only speculate because I'm I'm not in their minds. But, you know, one fact that might be relevant is, you know, in 2020, I was kinda center left, and I gave to Biden's campaign. I was optimistic he'd be a sort of solid center left president.
I spent the next few years in DC a lot. I mean, made dozens of trips there and was really, really shocked by what I saw, not in a good direction from the administration. By late twenty twenty two, I was giving to Republicans privately as much as Democrats. And that started becoming known right around FTX's collapse. So that probably played a role.
Why
Speaker 0: were you shocked? I know you spent a lot of time in DC. There are pictures of you with, you know, every you met everybody. What what was shocking about it?
Speaker 1: So some of it was just more extreme versions of what I worried about. Crypto regulation is a good example. You know, I never thought that, frankly, the Democrats in general would be the party taking the lead on good financial regulation. But, you know, there were good and bad people in each party and a lot of thoughtful players. But Gensler's SEC was something out of a nightmare.
You know, a company go offer something in The United States. Gensler would sue them to the ground for not registering. So you go to Gensler to register. Say, hey. You know, we'd love to register.
Office says what you want. What should we register as? And the ACC would say, well, well, there's nothing for you to register as.
Speaker 0: We don't
Speaker 1: have any ideas. There's just no solution. Required licenses that they didn't know how to give. And every company in crypto ran into this. They basically failed to register a single person ever.
That that was, like, one pretty disturbing thing that I saw. And, you know, go for it.
Speaker 0: So can I just ask you to explain a little bit there? It it's obvious to non experts like me that, you know, Gary Gensler is obviously corrupt. I mean, that was clear. But it was his motives were less clear. Like, what was that?
What what was his goal?
Speaker 1: It's a really good question. And, again, I'm not in his brain, but here are some impressions I had. You know, he I he really like being in the center of things. Power. Everyone likes that.
Yeah. Not every most people. He's no exception. You know, part of this is a turf war. He wanted his agency to get more power.
Even if he didn't want to do anything with it except block industries. You know, why did he make everyone register with them while he loses power, you know, otherwise? Even if he didn't know what to do with them. You know, he had there are lots of stories about him, you know, being very politically ambitious and feeling like if he could, you know, get on CNBC enough, make a big enough stink about things, raise his profile that, you know, maybe be treasury secretary, something like that in the future. And he I mean, he's remarkably successful.
Like, he he became sort of one of the few faces of democratic financial regulation.
Speaker 0: Interesting. That sounds right to me. I mean, those sound like Washington type goals. I've seen those before. Right.
So It wasn't moral.
Speaker 1: It's not like he had, like, deeply rooted communist beliefs or anything like that.
Speaker 0: Right. No. No. I I knew that. Right.
No. No. It's not like or any beliefs. Self advancement. So of when things started to go south and you were criminally charged or thought you might be criminally charged, you know, you've given so much money to the Democratic Party that I think it's pretty leaving aside moral judgment here, but it's pretty normal in business for the donor to call the person he's donating to and saying, hey.
I'm in trouble. Can you help me? Did you call Schumer or any of the people you had supported and say, you know, hey. I need your help. It's the Biden justice department.
Help me.
Speaker 1: I didn't for multiple reasons. One was, you know, I didn't wanna do something inappropriate. A second was I that many parts of it very quickly made their positions known and were running away as quickly as they could. You know, I had I had this good relationship, probably better with Republicans in DC as with Democrats by that point in time. Although that wasn't wasn't public.
It's not it wouldn't have been easy to see that from the outside. And at the end of the day, there's a long story here. It involves a law firm that took a pretty unusual and active role in the case. But before I even gave up control of FTX, before it was ever filed for bankruptcy, the DOJ had already made up its mind.
Speaker 0: And so there was you didn't call in any favors or tried to?
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: Interesting. What do you think of the future of crypto? I mean, obviously, you're must have complicated feelings since you ran a crypto company or in jail because of it, but you know a lot about the topic. You you sort of feel like things are moving very fast on crypto. Do you think they're moving in a good direction?
I know it's sort of weird to ask you this question, but I can't resist.
Speaker 1: No. Hopefully is what I would say. You know, you look at what the Trump administration said, you know, going into office, there are a lot of good things. There are a lot of things that, you know, were very different from the stance that Biden administration took, that, you know, cancer and the SEC took. Obviously, you know, the follow through is what matters.
And that's the stage that we're at now, which is what will come of this. And, I mean, not surprisingly, like, changing the guard helps. But financial regulators, they're big giant bureaucracies in the federal government. They're not used to changing overnight. And they have been playing a really obstructive role for, you know, a decade in crypto.
You have US, it's 30% of the world's finance. It's about 5% of the world's crypto. And the reason is entirely regulatory. It's just The US was unique in its difficulty to work with. So I think the big question is, will, you know, when rubber meets the road, like, will the administration do what needs to be done and figure out how to do it?
Speaker 0: I mean, I remember when the concept of crypto first arrived in the popular press, and the whole idea was that this was a currency that could restore to the individual his freedom of commerce. I get to buy and sell things without the government controlling me, and I could do it privately. It would restore my my privacy as well. And that obviously has never happened. It doesn't seem like it's ever going to happen, and I don't hear anybody say it anymore.
And now it just seems like it's kind of another asset scam. Whatever happened to I mean, these are broad brush statements, but whatever happened to the privacy thing?
Speaker 1: It's a really good question. And there's sort of a related thing about the technology. Right? Payments, remittances, like, all the things that are not just an investment, but ways that crypto could actually be useful for the world. You know, they happen on longer timescales than investments do, basically.
You know, with what social media has become, you see bubbles, you know, grow and pop and grow and pop on a daily to monthly basis. Technology is built out on a decade basis. So, you know, right now, crypto is not quite at a point where it could become an everyday tool of, you know, a quarter of the world or something. The tech isn't there yet, but it's not that far away. And if and this is an if.
If the industry keeps making progress rather than getting distracted too much by market prices, then, you know, five, ten years from now, you could imagine a world where all of a sudden, it is the case that anyone can have a crypto wallet. You know, billion people could use it each day with privacy, with security, fast, cheap, international, all the things that, you know, that was promised and that absolutely get are distracted from by police mean points.
Speaker 0: You you think world governments would allow that? I mean, if you actually allowed the world's population to conduct financial transactions without the control of governments, then governments would collapse instantly, wouldn't they?
Speaker 1: Well, it's an interesting question. And there are a lot of degrees here about the level of oversight control that it can have. You look at something like Bitcoin, and the wallets are anonymous, but there is a public ledger of every transfer that happens. So it is possible for governments to have some level of knowledge without having control of of it. That being said, not all the governments in the world view this the same.
And the United States government over the last thirty years has taken one view towards control of, not just The United States' strength, but the world's monetary dealings. You see, I mean, a different viewpoint, much more authoritarian, but also much more insular in a lot of dictatorships. But half the world doesn't try to have nearly the level of government involvement in day to day financial transactions that The United States has.
Speaker 0: So the people who built this country built it because they wanted freedom. One word, freedom. They wanted freedom from oppressors who forced them to buy overpriced tea, then blockaded them when they tried to dump it into the ocean. How'd that work out? Well, we built America in response.
So it's time to throw your big overpriced wireless contract overboard to a new tea party. You don't have to pay a hundred dollars a month just to use a phone. Most people don't use that much in services, but they pay it anyway. Our cell phone company PureTalk says no to those prices. With a qualifying plan, you can choose an iPhone 14 or a Samsung Galaxy for nothing, 0.
Get premium service on America's most dependable five gs network. It only takes a minute to switch. We highly recommend it. No hassle, no gimmicks. Just honest to goodness wireless priced right.
So you get your iPhone 14 or Samsung Galaxy for nothing, $0 with a qualifying plan. Go to puretalk.com/tucker. Visit PureTalk.com/Tucker for details. America's wireless company. Do you have any money left after all this?
Speaker 1: Well, basically, no. The company that I I used to own, maybe I still do own. I don't know. It's in bankruptcy, had had nothing intervened. Today, it would have about $15,000,000,000 of liabilities and about $93,000,000,000 of assets.
The answer should be, in theory, yes. That, you know, there was enough money to pay everyone back in kind at the time or today with, you know, plenty of interest left over and tens of billions left for investors. But I that's not how things worked out. And instead, it all got grilled up in a and, again, rolled in in a bankruptcy where I the assets were dissipated incredibly quickly by those controlling it. They're siphoned off tens of billions of dollars worth.
And I it's been a a colossal disaster. And, I mean, not stopping that from happening is by far the biggest regret of my life.
Speaker 0: So you knew everybody else in the crypto business. You're of the most famous people in the business before the charges, before, you know, all of this happened. Being as honest as you can, do you think you were the biggest criminal in the crypto business?
Speaker 1: I don't think as a criminal. So certainly, the answer to that is no. I mean, I think the DOJ thinks that I may have been, but I don't share their view.
Speaker 0: Well, yeah, you're you're in jail. They definitely that's their claim anyway. But but I wonder and I'm not you know, I've certainly criticized your business and other businesses like it in in the past. And, again, I'm not even getting into the details of your case because it's, like, Byzantine. But I'm I'm just wondering, like, do you think there's a lot of shady behavior in the crypto business?
You know, being honest.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Ten years ago, the answer was clearly yes, or at least yes relative to the scale of the industry. You know, you look in the the mid, you know, 2034 to 2017 sort of era, and there is not you know, the industry is a lot smaller than it was today. And and a lot of the transactions I saw, or least a higher fraction of them, were well, different people use different words for it, but it's Silk Road, you know, as an example. Right?
People purchasing narcotics online was a common use of crypto back ten years ago or so. Obviously, there are always gonna be criminals in any industry. But over time, the fraction of the industry that that represents has fallen off really substantially, both because of sort of growth of other areas of interest in crypto and also because of more government involvement on the anti money laundering side. So, yeah, there's still some, but not it's not as as prevalent as it once was.
Speaker 0: So you were famously identified with a worldview and ideology, maybe even a religion called effective altruism, and the idea was that, as I understand it, that you, you know, do the greatest good for the greatest number. You make money in order to help the maximum number of people, and some have pointed out the irony that in the collapse of your company, like a million people lost their money. So there were a lot of individuals hurt in an effort that you described as, like, the greatest good for the greatest number. And I wonder if all of this has made you rethink the precepts of effective altruism.
Speaker 1: It hasn't made me rethink the precepts. Obviously, I I feel terrible about what happened. It's not at all what I intended. Right. Whatever one's intentions are, I you know, if you screw up, then the results might be different.
You know, people have their money back at the end, but it's two excruciating years waiting for it. They got it back dollarized rather than in kind. And and certainly all the good that I've been hoping to do for the world ended up dissipating, or at least most of it did when the company collapsed.
Speaker 0: I guess what I'm saying is do I mean, I think it's hard for most people to understand the idea that it's more virtuous or valuable to help people they've never met than it is to help the people right in front of them. In other words, like, it's way more virtuous to help your wife, girlfriend, mother, daughter, brother, college roommate than it is to help, like, a village in a country you've never visited. I think that's how most people feel intuitively, but you you disagree.
Speaker 1: I disagree. Although, there is a caveat to it, which is that, you know, a classic mistake which people make, and I may have made at some points, is with people who you don't know who are distant from you, thinking you know what they need when you don't. You know, being paternalistic, kind of condescending, and, you know, there's so many foreign aid type projects that have gone awry and they have been complete wastes of money because no one knew the people they're getting to. No one knew what their lives were like. And
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: They're just guessing it with those people. It's just wrong. And and, you know, they show up with, like, a bunch of water pumps to a veggie fillet that has plenty of water and no food. Like, you know, people Exactly. Shipped in from Harvard to go hand out these water pumps no one wants.
And, you know, there's there's like example after example of this going around. Whereas obviously, like when you're dealing with people, you know, you know, you have much better sense of how to help them, and that's real. Like, that effect is absolutely real. And, you know, even if I think the life matters as much in one place as another, that doesn't mean that you know as well how how to help one as you do the other.
Speaker 0: Well, see, I think you're sort of making a counter case. You're arguing against your own position. I mean, isn't it I mean, I guess the problem I have with effective altruism is just too easy. I mean, it's like it's easy to cure polio. It's really hard to make the same woman happy for thirty years.
And so maybe it's better to do the hard thing.
Speaker 1: Well, I think what I'd say is, look, you look at I mean, malaria is a good example here. Right? No one dies of malaria anymore in The United States, and basically no one does. But globally, it's what? Like, a million people a year or something die of it.
And that's horrible that it happens. Like, this is just a disease people shouldn't be dying from anymore. We know how to basically eradicate it, and we should absolutely be doing that as a world. But, you know, because it's it's sort of like easy in some sense, that shouldn't stop us from being able to help people at home. You look at like the scale of resources that would be required to many of these interventions in the poorest part of the world, and it's not that big.
It's not making it would not take a big bite out of our domestic health if it were done efficiently. But the efficient part is a big piece of this. You can throw as many useless water pumps at villages without food as you want without curing anyone.
Speaker 0: No. I think I mean, you make a I mean, that's demonstrably true, and sixty years of aid to Africa has shown that as life expectancies decline. But I I guess as a moral matter Yep. How can you justify worrying about malaria when your cousin is addicted to Xanax? Shouldn't you fix that first?
Speaker 1: If I could. But, you know, at the end of the day, we have responsibilities to each of us. And, you know, if I know my cousin well, and I know how to solve his problem because I'm his cousin, then absolutely, like, I have a responsibility to do that. But if I've tried and I'm flailing at that, I can't figure out how to make progress, but I can figure out how to save lives internationally, or if someone can, then I don't think it takes away from the good that they can do internationally that they couldn't figure out how to solve their cousin's problem.
Speaker 0: Right. So do it again. I I don't I don't think that's a crazy point. Last question on this topic. Yeah.
Can you think of a big recent international aid project that was an unequivocal success?
Speaker 1: So sort of, but I'm not gonna name the it's not gonna be a government aid project, to be clear. There are private projects that happen.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: You know, I actually think malaria is a good example where a substantial fraction of the world's malaria has been cut down already by mostly private contributions from people in Sub Saharan Africa and India that, you know, saving probably hundreds of thousands of lives a year right now for, you know, thousands of dollars per life on average, which is, you know, sort of a stunning success on a relative scale. Now, we're not talking about a trillion dollars. We're talking about single digit billions of dollars directed by really careful work by philanthropists. And, you know, of course, you can look at gigantic government programs that did absolutely nothing. You know, if you want the government approach, I mean, I don't know, the Marshall Plan.
Like, it's sort of digging pretty deep in history, but rebuilding Germany after World War two was probably a a huge success on on many fronts.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I think we've we've undone it by blowing up Nord Stream. But but yeah. No.
Speaker 1: I think You know?
Speaker 0: I think it's a it's a fair point. So how how old are you now?
Speaker 1: You know, I the funny thing, it it's it took me a second to to think of the answer that it prison time changes when you're in prison. It becomes sort of an amorphous concept when every day is sort of like the last and they just blur together. The answer is, well, guess my birthday is tomorrow. So as of right now, I am I'm 32, but I will be 33 soon.
Speaker 0: How are you gonna celebrate your birthday?
Speaker 1: I'm not. I was never big on birthdays on the outside, and celebrating another year in prison just doesn't feel like all that exciting to me.
Speaker 0: So you're not gonna tell Diddy it's your birthday tomorrow? I don't believe you.
Speaker 1: I someone else might tell him, but I I don't plan to.
Speaker 0: So okay. So you'll be 33 tomorrow. If you are not pardoned, all things being equal, how old do you be when you get out?
Speaker 1: It's a complicated calculation, which I don't understand all the details of because of, like, first step back stuff. And if you just add, you know, my prison sentence, my age, so to speak, you know, then the answer is in my late forties.
Speaker 0: Wow. Could you handle that?
Speaker 1: Sorry. What I said was wrong. I I misspoke. If you had my prison sentence my age to late fifties, if you include all of the possible decreases, it might be the late forties. But but the raw answer is, I mean, it's 32 when I was convicted, and I got a twenty five year sentence.
So that's fifty seven.
Speaker 0: So having done two out of the 25 so far Yeah. Yeah. Do you think you could could you make it?
Speaker 1: It's a good question. I'm not sure. I mean, the the hardest thing is just not having something meaningful to be doing in here. And Yeah. You know, and you can look at their studies.
I have no idea how good they are, but they show, you know, you age at roughly three times the normal rate in prison. So, you know, you had three times 25 to my thirty two years when I was convicted, and, you know, that gets you an answer of maybe. So,
Speaker 0: I mean, it strikes me there's a kind of weird it's I mean, you went maybe more than anyone I've ever talked to from one world to a completely different world. So you were in the world of digital money. Now you're in a world with no money. Oh, yeah. What's the medium of exchange in prison?
Speaker 1: You know, it's whatever people have and, you know, muffins, like, these old so, like, little plastic wrapped you, like, you go to, like, a like, a a gas station, and, like, on the counter, there might be, like, a plastic bowl with little individually wrapped plastic muffins that have been sitting there for a week at at room temperature. You know, imagine one of those. That's sort of that that's, like, standard is that a a packet of ramen soup or a hand disgusting looking little foil package of fish in oil at room temperature?
Speaker 0: Oh. Yeah. So you went you went from crypto to to the muffin economy.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: That's right. How would how would you compare them? Obviously, it's harder to move muffins internationally, but
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: I don't think they're gonna be a currency.
Speaker 1: Anytime soon globally. I don't think it's gonna be a strategic muffin reserve. So, you know, they're a currency of need. They wouldn't be anything else. They don't have that much to recommend themselves.
But at the end of the day, they're kind of fungible. They're not exactly fungible, but they're close enough. You know, two muffins are kind of similar, so you can kind of trade them for each other. They they kind of work as long as you're never dealing with more than like $5. Right?
Because if if you wanted to do a $200 transaction in muffins, like what you know, like, I mean, it doesn't work physically. Right?
Speaker 0: And It's unwieldy.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's unwieldy. So one of the things that, like, you realize really quickly is, I mean, the scale of everything is so diminished in prison. You you see people getting into a fistfight over a single banana. Not because they even care about it that much, but because what else is there to channel your caring into?
Speaker 0: Oh, that's grim. Have you do you eat the muffins, by the way? I just eat hoard them?
Speaker 1: I I no. I just hoard them and and yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
I don't actually eat them. I I mostly eat rice and beans and ramen.
Speaker 0: Wow. Well, it looks like it's been it's been good for you. Do you have you gotten any tattoos?
Speaker 1: I I have not. I I know some people who have, but I have not gotten any prison tattoos.
Speaker 0: Have you thought about it?
Speaker 1: So, you know, there's a part of me that's always, like, thought about getting a tattoo, but talking with the inmates about their, you know, sanitization procedures or lack thereof for the needles sort of you know, that that cured that idea in my mind. Not no no interest anymore.
Speaker 0: It's not worth the hep c.
Speaker 1: It's not worth the hep c. It's you know, I would say, like, maybe they go to, like, four people or so before bothering to sanitize a needle. Oh. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Oh, okay. So you're not you're not doing that. So since since you've been away and you're facing, I guess, twenty three more years, I always wonder, like, the people you helped I mean, you're in prison because you hurt people, but you also helped a lot of people in Washington by giving them many, many millions of dollars. Did any of them call you to say, you know, good luck. I hope you're doing okay.
Don't join a gang or say anything to you at all?
Speaker 1: Right when the collapse hit, like, the immediate wake of it, I got a number of really nice messages from a lot of people, including some in DC. By six months later, none. And so by the time trial happened, where I was, you know, put in prison, nothing. And it's it became too politically toxic. It became the incentives were too skewed against people, you know, risking their necks.
I even heard, frankly, about people saying thirdhand, like, nice things about me, but no one wanted to be in contact with me directly.
Speaker 0: Did anyone contact you? I mean, I I noticed that your I thought it was your girlfriend testified against you. Like, were there did you have any friends who stayed loyal and supported you or and continue to?
Speaker 1: Barely. Yes. But very, very few. I was surprised. It makes sense in retrospect.
Anyone who was close to me end up with a gun to their head, you know, being told that they had two options, and one of them involved decades in prison. And, I mean, I I think Ryan Salem is sort of the saddest example of that, the most disgusting example from the government's perspective where, you know, they charged him of totally bogus crimes. He he said, no. I'll see you in court. So they went back and said, alright.
Well, how about your pregnant wife? What if we put her in prison? And so he pleads guilty because they're gonna put his wife in prison, which no sane legal system would make that a permissible thing for a prosecution to do. And then and he was even charged with most of what the other people who pled guilty were charged with. You know, Ryan, he doesn't testify at trial because he hasn't want to lie.
He hasn't wanted to say what the government wants him to say, and he ends up getting four times as much prison time as the other three guilty pleas combined. And, like, he couldn't send a clear message. Is it because he was a republican, or is it because he refused to parrot the government's lies at trial? Like, those are the only things I can imagine why they give him seven and a half years in prison.
Speaker 0: It's disgusting. And I It is. I had him to my house, and I interviewed him, and I think they charged his wife as well. It's totally immoral what they did.
Speaker 1: Totally. Right. They went back on their promise and and charged his wife anyway. Like, you know, just just to sort of disabuse any notion of them sort of, like, operating in good faith. It's it's disgusting.
He's he's a good guy. I you know, he didn't serve any of that.
Speaker 0: Has it dawned on you you know, I don't know what kind of news coverage you're getting, kind of contact you have with the outside world. Sounds like not too much. But that things are moving so quickly out here.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: By the time you get out, I mean, AI, for example, it sounds like we're reaching AGI or some Yeah.
Speaker 1: Something singularity like that. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Soon. Yeah. That you may emerge whenever you do into a world that that doesn't look anything like the world you left.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I feel pretty acutely, and it's, you know, the sort of feeling of the world moving on without you.
Speaker 0: Ugh. Is having children part of your effective altruism philosophy?
Speaker 1: No. Different people in the community have different views on it. And at the end of the day I mean, for, you know, five years, I felt like I had about 300 children most days, my employees. Like, it was obviously, I couldn't be a father in the same way to all of them, but I felt responsible for them. I mean, feel terrible about all their work being tossed down the drain.
But I didn't have time for my personal life at all, basically, when I was running FTX. And, I mean, I certainly am not in a position to have kids from in person. So
Speaker 0: Have any of those 300 employees visited you in jail?
Speaker 1: No. Think the answer is is no to that. You know, there's one or two
Speaker 0: Probably ought to have some real kids at some point, don't you think? Because they when things go bad, they stick around.
Speaker 1: You know, it it it's got me thinking about what it means to have real friends. And it's and and about the amount of power that some systems in our country end up having and the amount of intimidation that can be achieved implicitly. But I but also about, yeah, having people I know I can count on.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Other people are all that matter. Sam Bankman Fried, I I I'm grateful that you did this, and it's probably the only interview you ever do where you don't get pressed on your business because there are other people to do that, but I was glad to talk to you, and I hope you'll give our best to Diddy.
Speaker 1: I I will absolutely
Speaker 0: do I can't believe you're in jail with Diddy.
Speaker 1: That's unbelievable. Right? It's you know, someone told me three years ago, like, you'll be hanging out with Diddy, you know, every day. I'd like, oh, that's interesting. I wonder how that's gonna happen.
I guess he gets into crypto or something. It's this is fucking fucked.
Speaker 0: Oh, life is so weird. Godspeed. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Thank you.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Robert DeNiro is NEVER going to recover from this.. 🤣🤣 https://t.co/6KPqry3Znq
Video Transcript AI Summary
Bobby, it's your favorite president here. I forgive you for being a loser about the election results. It's not your fault you have a low IQ. Believe me, I won, and Kamala lost big time. You were wrong.
You're a total loser, and your show sucks. You're going to get low ratings. It's a disgrace to go from raging gold to raging nobody. It's a horror. Kamala's probably getting drunk somewhere, the f***ing virgin. Can you believe this guy calling your favorite president a virgin? Look at that crowd; it's a disgrace. But don't worry, we already won big. Come here, paparazzi! I love this guy. Do you want to do a little dance?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bobby, it's your favorite president. I forgive you, Bobby, for being such a loser about the election. It's not your fault. You were born with a low IQ. It's not your fault, Bobby.
Believe me. Bobby, favorite president won. Kamala lost. She lost so strongly. You were wrong.
You're a loser. You're a total loser. This show sucks. You're gonna get low ratings, Bobby. You're gonna get low ratings.
Look at that. From raging gold to raging nobody. Such a disgrace. You're such a disgrace, Bobby. It's a horror.
It's an absolute horror. Kamala is getting drunk somewhere. Fucking virgin. Unbelievable. Look at this guy.
That's that guy's calling your favorite president of virgin. Can you believe it? Look at that crowd. It's such a horror. It's such a disgrace if you look at it, but we're gonna win.
We won big. Okay? Look at the look at that pop come here, paparazzi. Come here. I love this guy.
Look at that. Unbelievable. You wanna do a little dance, paparazzi? Come here.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
HOLY SHLIT ICE is ARRESTING people at an anti-ICE protest in NYC. 👀 https://t.co/ykClpIG6qJ
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Woke teachers are now being forced to take down their cuIt flags.. 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/SRY2CwYuYC
Video Transcript AI Summary
抱歉，提供的文本没有实际内容可供总结。请提供包含具体信息或讨论的完整转录内容，以便我能为您创建更简洁的摘要。
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯 嗯
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
LMAOO… I can’t breathe. 💀💀 https://t.co/PEMw4bZLzw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mister Hegseth, are you attracted to obese Hawaiian women with low intelligence? No, senator. Are you aware that I used the potty by myself today? No, senator. You seem quite fertile; if confirmed, would you commit to having a baby with me? No, senator. Are you saying under oath that you refuse to impregnate a portly Hawaiian woman, even if she can use the potty independently?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Hegseth, are you attracted to obese Hawaiian women with a below normal IQ? No, senator. Mister Hegseth, are you aware that I used the potty all by myself today? No, senator. Mister Hegseth, you seem to be pretty fertile.
If confirmed, would you commit to putting a baby in me? No, senator. Mister Hegseth, are you saying under oath that you refuse to impregnate a portly, Hawaiian retarded woman, even if she can use the potty all by herself?
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Liberals are now saying that they’re “embarrassed’ to be Americas, following Trumps victory… 👀 https://t.co/qxaafnqzy3
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's 2025, and I feel embarrassed to be an American. I want to apologize to the world, as more than half of us did not want this situation. I'm truly sorry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's 2025, and I am fucking embarrassed to be an American. And I just want to apologize to the rest of the world, and say that there is, more than half of us that did not want this. And I am so sorry. I am I am fucking embarrassed to be an American. That's all I have to say.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
How could anyone vote AGAINST this man!? The GOAT. 🔥🔥 https://t.co/Z3ffHOKUot
Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe in dedicating myself to public service, despite its challenges. I understand that having strong, possibly unpopular views can be tough, but I am here to be your voice. To every parent with dreams for their child and every child with hopes for the future, I stand with you. I will fight for you and ensure we succeed together. We will restore strength, safety, and greatness to America. God bless you, and good night.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why wouldn't you dedicate yourself to public service? Well, I think it's a very mean life. I I would love and I would I would dedicate my life to this country, but I see it as being a mean life. And I also see it as somebody with strong views and somebody with the kind of views that are maybe a little bit unpopular, which may be right, but may be unpopular. I am your voice.
I am your voice. So to every parent who dreams for their child and every child who dreams for their future, I say these words to you tonight. I am with you. I will fight for you, and I will win for you. We will make America strong again.
We will make America safe again, and we will make America great again. God bless you, and good night.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
BREAKING 🅱️ Nancy Pelosi is up $2.3 MILLION in the stock market today. Her estimated net worth is now $264 MILLION. https://t.co/IoSpLBu11N
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
This video of Donald Trump COOKING Chuck Schumer never gets old. 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/juZVsLAjRr
Video Transcript AI Summary
I will take responsibility for shutting down the government if we don't achieve our goals, particularly regarding border security. The American people want to prevent criminals and drugs from entering the country, and I am proud to stand for that. I won't blame anyone else for the shutdown; I will own it. Last time it happened, it didn’t work out, but I’m ready to take that stand again. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: None of us have seen You wanna know something? You've said. Okay. You wanna put that on my You've said it. I'll take it.
Okay. Good. You know what I'll say? Yes. If we don't get what we want, one way or the other, whether it's through you, through a military, through anything you wanna call, I will shut down the government.
Absolutely not. And I am proud, and I'll tell you what. I am proud to shut down the government for border security, Chuck, because the people of this country don't want criminals and people that have lots of problems and drugs pouring into our country. So I will take the mantle. I will be the one to shut it down.
I'm not gonna blame you for it. The last time you shut it down, it didn't work. I will take the mantle of shutting You're the liar. Thank you very much, everybody.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Hillary Clinton says that the Democrats lose TOTAL control if they stop censoring social media. 👀https://t.co/9g9kwFbZT1
Video Transcript AI Summary
If platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or TikTok fail to moderate and monitor content, we risk losing control. This lack of oversight leads to not only social and psychological issues but also real harm.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And if the platforms, whether it's Facebook or TwitterX or, Instagram or TikTok, whatever they are, if they don't moderate, and monitor the content, we lose total control. And it's not just the social and psychological effects. It's real harm.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Liberal says that he’s leaving the United States and will be moving to Hawaii. 💀💀💀 https://t.co/ZjjQ8aaAUM
Video Transcript AI Summary
Since Trump's election victory, I've decided to leave the US and move to Hawaii. I'll keep you updated on how it goes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So since Trump won the election, we're hooked. Yep. I'm gonna be leaving the US, and I'm gonna be moving to Hawaii. So we'll see how it goes, and I'll update you guys.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Candace Owen’s has endorsed Alex Jones for potential role as White House Press Secretary. 👀 https://t.co/6hU8WfUgi0
Video Transcript AI Summary
I would do anything to support Alex Jones as Trump's press secretary, even working extra jobs to cover his salary. Having him in that role would be an incredible move, and he is well-equipped for it after years of hosting his show. The deep state despises him, which makes it even more appealing.
While I could also excel in that position, Alex Jones would be the perfect fit. Imagine daily press briefings that feel like watching Game of Thrones, filled with his unique responses to the media. That’s my vote for the role.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna be very clear about Alex Jones. I will crawl over broken glass and give him everything I earn to if if if if all he needs is someone to pay the salary, leave it to me. Leave it to me. I'll get I'll get a second job to pay whatever salary he wants to be the press secretary. If he's like, I'm gonna need half a $1,000,000 a year, leave it to me.
Like I said, I will pick up a job, and I will I will raise the money. It it'll be totally fine if we get Alex Jones. We are not worthy. We are not worthy. But Trump, please, it would be the greatest troll.
And by the way, he is more than equipped for it. He has run a show for decades. All he does is talk and answer and respond to questions. He is totally equipped from it, and they hate him. The deep state hates Alex Jones with a vengeance.
X Smokes writes, Candace, you should be Trump's press secretary. Look, I would be very good at that job, but come on, Alex Jones. Like, there could be no one better suited for that job that would make us happier. We would be watching press briefings every single day like it was Game of Thrones. Like, we'd just be in seasons of Game of Thrones watching Alex Jones respond to the press.
So that is my vote.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Why would I unify with Democrats who were actively pushing for Communism? https://t.co/SUbm2DaHJS
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
Anonymous has released a message about Tim Walz. Every American needs to see this! 🔥 https://t.co/fFpSYjmDSP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tim Waltz, you played a significant role in the George Floyd riots, delaying the National Guard's deployment while Minneapolis burned. You allowed sensitive information to leak, enabling looters. You labeled Trump and his supporters as fascists, contributing to a hostile environment. Your administration has enacted extreme youth surgery laws, allowing teenagers to undergo irreversible procedures, and supports radical abortion laws with no limits, resulting in the legal murder of newborns. You advocate for open borders, suggesting a "ladder" for illegal immigrants. During COVID, you approved significant funds for frontline workers, yet a large portion went to ineligible individuals. You align closely with Democratic leadership, presenting yourself as a moderate while embodying radical policies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to the race, Tim Waltz. Let's make sure America knows who you are. You helped ignite the George Floyd riots, the worst the country had ever seen in decades. While Minneapolis burned, you stalled on deployment of the National Guard for an entire day, blaming the city for not submitting the right paperwork. You let your daughter leak the guards deployment plans online so that rioters would know how long they have to loot the city with impunity.
Minneapolis is a war zone because of you. Just days after the attempted murder of Donald Trump, you called him and his supporters fascists, egging on the same rhetoric that led him to being shot in the first place. You have overseen some of the most radical youth trans surgery laws in the country. Under your leadership, teenagers can get their breast chopped off and get sterilized and your government calls it health care. You have the most radical abortion laws in the country.
Zero limits. Every year, 5 to 6 babies are born alive and then murdered legally under laws you support. On immigration, you famously said you wanted to provide a ladder so invaders can come over Trump's wall. You are a radical open border zealot. Also, during COVID, you approved 500,000,000 in hero pay for frontline workers only to have 40% of that money go to people who were ineligible or in many cases, literally deceased.
The White House, you were Pelosi's sidekick and did whatever the Democrats demanded. You will try to disguise yourself as a Pope Seaman Western moderate. In reality, you are a white male version of Kamala Harris. Radical, inept, undeserving to be in leadership.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
BREAKING 🚨 Tim Walz is going viral for giving Michigan voters the middle finger! YIKES!
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
HOLY SHT A FBI whistleblower urges Americans to vote, arm themselves, stock up 3-4 months of food supplies, and PRAY. 👀 https://t.co/bue1Q70DEK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Allen stated the hearing was his last act as a public servant, offering a warning to Americans. He has no confidence the FBI will reign in its own conduct, believing it uses reprisal and fear to control its workforce and that there are no effective checks and balances against its lawless actions. He believes over classification of information allows them to stonewall forever.
Allen urges Americans to vote, despite doubts about election integrity, to stake their claim. He also recommends exercising the Second Amendment right to bear arms and learning self-defense. He suggests building community by making friends and promising mutual aid, stocking up a pantry with 3-4 months of food, and practicing faith through prayer and reading the gospel.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And everybody in the minority party, there's some talk they're fearing what Donald Trump would do in the next administration while they sit here and they look at the guy who's been persecuted by the FBI, and everybody in the room understands it. Mister Allen, do you have comments you wish to make? I give you about a minute, minute and a half, and then I wanna turn the rest of my time to mister Jordan. Yes, sir. I would just say that I consider the hearing today my last act of service as a public servant for the United States of America,
Speaker 1: and I'll give you my professional opinion. I was an intel professional for our country for many years, and I would give recommendations and I'd also look at indications and warnings. So I would offer this to the American people as my warning to them. Since this is a warning, the American people I say, I personally have no confidence that the FBI will reign in its own conduct. I've been persecuted along with Garrett, Steve and Kyle, and countless other whistleblowers.
It is my opinion that the bureau used reprisal and fear to control the workforce. It has been a seemingly effective tactic. I personally believe that there are no current effective checks and balances against them conducting lawless action with any type of correction in a legitimate time frame. I welcome the work of the IG, but I think any type of lawless action knows no legitimate time frame to reign them back in. Their ability to over classify information can allow them to stonewall forever.
To the American people, you have a duty as a citizen to vote, and I strongly urge you to do so. It's how you participate in the American experience. I know people have doubts about election integrity, but you must vote. It is your claim. Stake your claim and don't forfeit it willingly.
Have your voice heard. My other recommendations are in the natural order. 1st vote. The second is the second amendment. Arm yourself and know how to defend yourself.
Make 3 to 4 friends in your neighborhood and promise to come to each other's mutual aid in times of harms hardship. And during the great depression, people stocked up a pantry. So I think that's a good practice, especially in our economic times, and make sure you have 3 to 4 months of food. As a person of faith, I'd say pray the rosary, go to the 1st Friday devotions. That's for everybody, all my brothers and sisters of all faiths, and I know I'm Catholic, and read the gospel of our lord and savior Jesus Christ and live it every day.
And that's all I have to say. Thank you for the time.
Speaker 0: You know, mister Allen, the fact that there are servants like you who have not born up under persecution that a lot of political leaders in this country do not care about is the thing that heartens the American people, and I'm confident the American people will will resolve the situation.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
HOLY SHT! Something is going down. @Usher just DELETED all of his X posts. Elon also quoted one of his old posts, saying that Twitter is a crime scene. 👀 https://t.co/0QEnNr3k9W
